Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

So did you file aggravated perjury?

Aggravated perjury is in the works.

the facts to you it's it's not perjury it's fraud. Oh boy. Which goes to

That's aggravated perjury

for aggravated perjury for making a material statement in the citation that's untrue

either one of which is aggravated perjury

and under perjury you don't have to prove at which time the person committed perjury

if one is true the other one must be untrue and that's sufficient to convict for aggravated perjury

that they're a patient and they're not then you can nail them for perjury

You might look at filing aggravated perjury

When I made my statement of facts under penalty of perjury, I was reviewing it last night

You cannot be charged with perjury if you recant.

That doesn't go to the crime directly, so you can't commit perjury by lying about any

and then there's a statement of facts under penalty of perjury

perjury malicious prosecution and don't roll over for them, it's going to go away. The

And you go back and charge him with impersonating a judicial officer. You charge him with perjury on his oath, aggravated perjury when he filed his oath,

before the House Judiciary Committee in transcribed depositions under penalty of perjury.

maybe to commit perjury if you are to say what's your birth date, what state you're born in,

it would be perjury, it would be no such thing.

Whoever's saying that doesn't understand the nature of perjury.

Perjury is when you deliberately misrepresent a fact.

that's not perjury.

Even if somebody told you wrong, it's still not perjury.

Perjury goes to intent.

instead of saying you don't know because that could be actually, I guess, argued to be perjury,

You should have filed aggravated perjury, malicious prosecution against the officer.

So tell me, Officer Pringle, when did you commit aggravated perjury?

I said, they can't get you for perjury if you can't remember nothing

And the attorney here encouraged all these litigants to commit perjury.

I don't want to go after them for perjury.

And all of a sudden now they've committed perjury.

So if a cop gets in a court and charges me with speeding, then I charge him with aggravated perjury

Perjury there.

Okay, this is where you go after the officer for aggravated perjury and you sue him.

Hey, speaking of aggravated perjury, Randy, I have a question too that's somewhat related.

That's when we're talking about perjury.

All right. But also, can I get the officer for aggravated perjury?

He's saying that it does. Would that be perjury?

Perjury only goes to statements of material fact made under oath and stating that a statute doesn't apply to him.

So, no, I don't think we could get him for aggravated perjury on that.

And I was arrested for criminal trespass. Now, that's aggravated perjury on its face.

cause affidavit is provided under penalty of perjury.

about where I am going to charge the officer making the accusation with aggravated perjury

was that every single FBI agent in the case had committed massive perjury before the judge.

produced all the evidence showing the massive perjury involved in this case.

for providing false information or perjury to the court?

because you can show aggravated perjury.

You don't have to prove when she committed aggravated perjury,

perjury because it contains false statements and the officer would have to know that they

So once again, we now have a faulty complaint and that results in aggravated perjury because

That makes it aggravated according to the definition of aggravated perjury, correct Randy?

Aggravated perjury goes to a false statement of a material fact.

So it's not perjury.

So absolutely that would go to aggravated perjury.

So it was aggravated perjury actually.

of aggravated perjury.

And it is not made under penalty of perjury and oath

with the government document and aggravated perjury.

individual, and kicked him off the grand jury without cause and threatened him with perjury

So it's very unlikely that if anyone subpoenaed to this meeting, it's very unlikely they would commit aggravated perjury on the stand

But it also would go in with a clear and present criminal complaint against the police officer for basically committing fraud and aggravated perjury.

Right. Which, as we said before, means he knows the difference, which means the moment he writes a non-commercial vehicle, a speeding ticket, he has intentionally committed aggravated perjury.

And there's a blank form that Wendy gave me that is to do with that court case about the fact that the court can commit perjury

You should file aggravated perjury, tampering with the government document against them

That's aggravated perjury

File aggravated perjury, tamper them with a government document, and dance with them

So, right off the bat, once again, Officer Fitch has committed aggravated perjury

but, you know, a perjury and good things like that,

And on top of that, since the officer has signed a sworn statement to that effect, he has committed aggravated perjury because he has made at least three presumptions of fact that he does not have firsthand knowledge of, yet he has sworn that he does.

So once the officer gets on the stand and says that I am operating a motor vehicle, he has committed perjury under oath for the second time.

he's against that this individual is against I would that's enough to tie him to the perjury

an SOB yes judge I can and I immediately filed aggravated perjury charges against it now

and you can prove they are not, the cop's committed aggravated perjury

You can hit the cop with aggravated perjury.

If you hit the cop with aggravated perjury, you disqualify him as a witness for the state.

will charge him with aggravated perjury for lying to the.

perjury against the officers whose, you don't even care who it was that secured the warrant,

Yeah, well, aggravated perjury isn't very minor, but it does seem to be the most obvious

And you file the criminal complaint of perjury against him

Showing the perjury of the...or at least opening that door

He tells them and going through situations like this a couple times he said look if you guys will sign under penalty of perjury

If they sign on the dotted line under penalty of perjury that they are declaring that this is the tax assessment

Well no what you want to do is you want an original certified signed under penalty of perjury assessment

Because an assessment must be signed under penalty of perjury

Because there was no valid assessment signed under penalty of perjury accompanying the information I received

Well again the paperwork they sent you did not contain a signed under penalty of perjury assessment

Okay if there's no signed under penalty of perjury assessment for taxes owed or taxes owing

Without a signed under penalty of perjury assessment for all these taxes

Well, actually he's committed aggravated perjury.

Now, if they deny it and you can prove that it's true, that's aggravated perjury.

They either, if they deny one of them and you can prove that it is actually true, you file aggravated perjury against them.

That's aggravated perjury.

Once again, aggravated perjury.

Perjury against their oath of office.

and chief of police of the city of Russ, Joe Evans, with aggravated perjury, subordination

of perjury, felony tampering with the government document, conspiracy to commit, tampering with

of perjury and sworn to and put in the record that i was driving a motor vehicle at the

with aggravated perjury, subordination of perjury,

the statement that you committed assault against them is aggravated perjury on its face.

File against them, charge them with perjury, charge them with malicious prosecution.

I said, I'm going to elicit perjury from this officer.

perjury and tampering with a government document. He gave it to the county attorney who looked

a warrant anyway. He suborned perjury and he tampered with the government document.

I filed aggravated perjury against the guy who issued the original complaint.

I filed subordination of perjury against the county attorney.

Subordination of perjury against the county attorney, the district, the county judge who

issued the warrant, I filed conspiracy to commit, perjury, subordination of perjury,

but it's along the lines of declarations and perjury.

And I bring up the fact that because it's signed under penalty of perjury,

which perjury is a criminal act, you can never usually get a judge if you make an objection that it is perjury

and file a criminal complaint for perjury along with that declaration to get them to not accept it as evidence.

And that's an issue I've got in my criminal complaint that they committed perjury

So it's not perjury.

Well, it may be simple perjury, not aggravated perjury.

Now you've got aggravated perjury.

then you sign that document and there's penalty of perjury clause at the bottom

I also charged her for tampering with a witness, obstruction of justice, perjury, subordination of perjury,

perjury. And I'm going to have him lay that foundation in court. So then I'm going to

file for aggravated perjury because it contains false statements.

when did you commit aggravated perjury? When you signed this citation stating that you

is horrible. I need you to arrest him for aggravated perjury. And the judge looked at

At the bottom it says, I declare under penalty of perjury that I am a U.S. citizen.

from acts of aggravated perjury.

So if he commits aggravated perjury in the making of the criminal accusation, he is personally

State charges of tampering with a witness, aggravated perjury, subordination of perjury,

So did you file malicious prosecution, aggravated perjury, tampering with government documents against them?

perjury, malicious prosecution, sorry about that, and go after the officers.

and has therefore committed perjury.

for perjury and obstruction of justice.

Charge him with malicious prosecution for aggravated perjury

I also wrote up an affidavit, a declaration, unsworn declaration under perjury of the events.

So I said in the unsworn declaration under perjury that I was forced to plead no low contender to the clerk, trial by clerk basically.

And then I wrote an affidavit and a declaration sworn under penalty of perjury without the United States

It's like where is the person signing under penalty of perjury that he witnesses, a competent fact witness, a dog cannot sign a statement, okay?

appeal not from shielding the officer against allegations of aggravated perjury for lying in

You understand that when an employer issues a 1099, 1099 is a kind of an insignificant document because it's not signed under penalty of perjury.

But the employer has to file a 1096, which is signed under penalty of perjury, and it in essence becomes the charging instrument.

Everybody goes after the 1099 and questions this authority and raises a stand about being signed under penalty of perjury.

Because of the fact that they've issued that and stated under penalty of perjury that what they were reporting was taxable income when in fact it's not.

form and it has to be certified under penalties of perjury and then because a lot of the companies

also has to be certified under penalties of perjury.

penalty of perjury.

And if you signed that under penalty of perjury, you're pretty well stuck

Verification is an interesting thing though. I noticed that with attorneys, attorneys never sign anything and there will be a perjury

Isn't it also under penalty of perjury as well?

me with the wedding signature of the contract, certified under the penalties of perjury by

with the wet ink signature, certified through perjury by the custodian of account. That�s

I'll be accusing the officers of aggravated perjury, conspiracy to commit, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated assault.

the defendant's lawyer. You're sworn in under penalty of perjury in front of an older republic,

ask them for proof under penalty of perjury, we have a standard letter that says you have

and perjury, and we lived through, you know, both Bush administrations. And I'm, with all

I mean, you're filing under penalty of perjury. You're speaking the facts. You're speaking the truth.

The officer is not signing the ticket in the presence of someone that can take his oath under penalty of perjury

for fraud, malicious prosecution, and perjury.

that it is made under penalty of perjury, that it states these specific facts,

Then we go to aggravated perjury,

perjury that was committed to when the first three and a half years danced with this guy.

Cheney's chief of staff, Scooter Libby, was indicted, tried and convicted for perjury,

penalties of perjury to accompany all documents produced for distribution would be as a sovereign

for aggravated perjury and things like this.

called perjury and fraud.

You have received validation in writing and certified proof under penalty of perjury for alleged debt.

Okay. Malicious prosecution, tampering with the government document, aggravated perjury.

intended that it be taken as true, and he filed it under oath, aggravated perjury.

aggravated perjury, abusive process, official misconduct, official oppression,

Now if you misrepresent the facts, that's aggravated perjury

Even if you commit aggravated perjury and lie like a dog, you cannot be sued, period

Aggravated perjury

When did you commit aggravated perjury?

That's aggravated perjury

Aggravated perjury

tax returns, and a six-page form with everything I own, et cetera, under penalty of perjury,

The marshal committee, if you have written aggravated perjury against the marshal, go for the marshal.

Three times the amount they would defraud you from plus cost, and aggravated perjury against the marshal,

chance did you commit perjury by signing a complaint stating that I was operating one of those motor

is committing aggravated perjury when he signs that complaint and files it in the court. End of story.

aggravated perjury in this case, correct? That should make him look real good in front of the jury,

And how many aggravated perjury charges have you filed against her?

The clerk's committing aggravated perjury.

She's making it up as she goes and then signs it under penalty of perjury.

That's aggravated perjury, dude.

He has committed aggravated perjury, in my opinion, even though there's nothing signed.

Sure, sure, because they don't want to get accused of perjury, you know, so

Yeah, if it's going to keep an aggravated perjury charge off their head,

Aggravated perjury in Texas is a felony.

For the commission of aggravated perjury, a felony offense, I hereby place you

it signed under penalty of perjury, that it's the truth, okay, and 90% of the time you'll

and he says yes, and he's not, then he's got perjury, right?

It's up to the other side to accuse us of perjury and then let them prove it.

And if they want to try to prove you wrong and try to accuse you of perjury,

then that's perjury, you know, jail time, et cetera, et cetera.

because you are going under penalty of perjury and we need to stand in the

...now you've got perjury...

Yeah. Not only that, you definitely want a copy of the criminal complaint to see how it's worded because you're about to hang these officers for aggravated perjury.

Opened perjury in the courtroom in front of a judge and he did nothing.

Yes, so what you do is charge the police officer with aggravated perjury, accusing you of committing a crime that you,

And aggravated perjury is a first-degree, is a third-degree felony.

That's a separate violation of aggravated perjury.

And, I mean, literally hold a trial, indict these people and put them in jail for perjury

when did you commit aggravated perjury?

Yet they're stealing it, they committed open perjury in the court

because no officer of the court notary will put their butt on the line to go to prison for perjury and whatever else, because that's not who they really say they are.

So did you file perjury against her for the...or tamper with the government document for the filing?

makes it legal. And you signed that affidavit under penalty of perjury that the contents

The top part of it is going to already say, I hereby certify under penalty of perjury

perjury of oath

thing under sworn you know penalty of perjury under oath type of stuff and got the limited

Yes, and you could move for perjury on the part of her.

Well, I was going to do that too for perjury because according to Missouri state law, if

You can't be charged with aggravated perjury though, Randy

They can be prosecuted for aggravated perjury

Versus the aggravated perjury is a felony

So if you file against whoever the chief is for establishing this policy and accuse whoever told you they saw two, they had evidence of two cars there with stickers on it, charge them with aggravated perjury.

committing, in my opinion, blatant perjury to the grand jury,

That's aggravated perjury.

If the person got on the stand and lied about something that matters, that's aggravated perjury.

That would be absolute fraud and perjury if you couldn't get around that.

who's going to assign under penalty of perjury that what happened was true and correct?

there may be a charge of aggravated perjury in there.

So she actually committed false swearing and perjury.

and signing a notarized affidavit under penalty of perjury to that effect.

and put their name on the line and notarize an affidavit under penalty of perjury,

Here's where I got it and sign it under penalty of perjury or prove it or else to me, I'm not going to stand by it and say that I agree that it's true.

Yeah, you charge him with possession, then you charge him with aggravated perjury for falsifying a charge.

You charge him with aggravated perjury.

sense under penalty of perjury or used as evidence in court that if somebody says something

Okay, did he file aggravated perjury against whoever made the statement?

he is committing aggravated perjury.

He is also committing aggravated perjury

So just exactly where is this officer thinking his proof is evident and that he's not going to get slapped with an aggravated perjury charge?

Aggravated perjury.

One of them we just said, aggravated perjury.

Is it true, officer, that you signed this ticket under penalty of perjury and

put that complaint under penalty of perjury that all the information you

Now, the aggravated perjury comes in, once again,

but he's committed aggravated perjury

that was a separate crime, aggravated perjury,

false imprisonment, aggravated perjury, you've got a laundry list.

tampering with a government document, aggravated perjury.

for aggravated perjury. Charge him anything you want to.

Those notarized affidavits signed under penalty of perjury, those have to get to the DA immediately

file a complaint with the department accusing the officers of aggravated perjury, false

an oath under penalty of perjury, I went out, got it, you know, sworn, you know, in front

penalty of perjury, if I don't, I'm a felon, I can't vote, I am disqualified for office,

If you're serious about it, you'll swear to it on your penalty of perjury, especially

I'm simply telling you that if they're willing to commit fraud, aggravated perjury,

The one who wrote the citation, that's aggravated perjury on its face.

because one or both of them is going to be done under aggravated perjury.

and cite each one of the officers for aggravated perjury,

Yeah, the aggravated perjury.

The aggravated perjury, abuse of official capacity, and official oppression.

perjury or submitting false information on a government document, and it even says on

can take an oath and get up on the witness stand and testify under penalty of perjury

of perjury, then fine, let's get it on with the dogs, okay, otherwise forget it, all right,

or a sign under penalty of perjury or any of these things,

Aggravated perjury, tampering with a government document if they put a false statement on

complaint under penalty of perjury notarized.

person is willing to fill out a sworn affidavit signed under penalty of perjury, that sort

Aggravated perjury, malicious prosecution

Ah, but you can get them on aggravated perjury

Aggravated perjury on which part?

Well, I see that as aggravated perjury.

then they're supposed to actually verify that under penalty of perjury that they had it and they lost it.

it's when you have all these agencies that you are doing work for that are certifying under penalty of perjury

Perjury and also the judge was finding me in contempt for saying that I was the

them stating and see this is where Holder's pleadings should get him an aggravated perjury

Well, it's not only called conversion, but it's aggravated perjury also for swearing to facts that are untrue and knowingly untrue.

okay, alleged small government Republicans swear to what you promised under penalty of perjury,

There's aggravated kidnapping, official oppression, aggravated perjury and tampering with a government document

It's for declaring that you are telling the truth under penalty of perjury that you saw

like something that you would testify as a witness to under penalty of perjury.

in the court record, then we go to the grand jury with charges of aggravated perjury, tampering

that in and of itself would appear to be an aggravated perjury statement

officer, aggravated perjury and a couple other things.

Malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, aggravated assault, aggravated perjury,

That makes it aggravated perjury.

so they can't sell it until the action's over, rescission, accounting, and perjury.

Exactly. I and my name hereby swear under penalty of perjury that I have, that I believe and have reason to believe

act of perjury or aggravated perjury. Number nine, this argument exists because the complaint

perjury and containing a knowingly false misrepresentation and inference by the accuser is proof positive

and sworn under penalty of perjury that its entire contents is true and correct and it's

If they made any statement that wasn't true, charge them with aggravated perjury.

him of failing to speak with candor to the court and committing aggravated perjury by

You should file aggravated perjury against the cops.

to the video, and that proves that they committed perjury.

Either somebody committed perjury on the witness stand, or the video was tampered with.

Either the video has been altered or somebody committed perjury, one or the other.

Then you can slap perjury charges on them.

that in fact did not occur, then that's aggravated perjury because those complaints were signed

Well, aggravated perjury for trying to write this down as you said.

the whole point oh jeez what could i get if they did it in the complaint it's aggravated perjury

want to look and see if there is one for uh aggravated perjury because in a court document

sworn under oath and penalty of perjury if that's swearing at least in texas law and i'm pretty

and it is aggravated perjury okay here it says if they make or subscribe a false statement which

Now, you can be prosecuted for perjury, but that's criminal

and so on and so forth, those are criminal charges, aggravated perjury, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution.

Defendants lawyers where I caught him committing perjury in one of his court papers

So he committed perjury

We went through an entire case, an entire case, full of fraud, perjury, fixed up documents.

aggravated perjury when you signed the complaint against me or did you commit aggravated perjury

the criminal act of aggravated perjury? Unless the officer would like to invoke his fifth

Now, if you lie like a dog, you can be prosecuted for perjury,

the whole case. And then they took documents, whitened them out. They committed perjury.

If I can get her to indicate any doubt, now I've got her for aggravated perjury and malicious prosecution.

that there was perjury involved, because there

Well, that's fraud, not perjury.

Perjury, right.

Well, no, perjury is something that's done under oath.

In the case of appearing in court, that is perjury.

OK, if that's the relationship, then that's not perjury or fraud

now it's perjury.

the principal, then you might have a case for the perjury.

Now if you lie or commit perjury, you can be prosecuted for that.

it has in a case. The test of perjury is extremely important. The test of sufficiency of whether the

is whether or not the affidavit can support a conviction for perjury based upon whether or not

be false, then that person could be charged with perjury. But what we find is that these sufficiency

whatever, guilty of perjury. Should the facts be shown to be false, if the affidavit does not have

I don't think there's a single servicer out there who would risk perjury claiming that they have agency for the principal.

Are they doing that to try to perhaps get out of being accused of perjury?

I mean, there are some states that have some very severe penalties for perjury.

Well, that's perjury.

And it can be from a few years up to 15 years I've seen in one case where a class one or first degree perjury can have a penalty of up to 15 years.

Of course not because it fails the test of perjury.

If you couldn't nail a person for perjury, it's an invalid affidavit.

Could that be like, say for example, the language from 28 U.S.C. Section 1746 where it says, I we declare or certify, verify or state under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that these facts are true and correct?

Okay, so they can use that, but as long as they are putting themselves under the possible penalty of perjury, if the facts are shown to be false, then it has weight.

Oh, they got a problem, you need to file aggravated perjury against these guys?

in the document is because the document is an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury.

to be signed under penalty of perjury, okay? They're going to be constructed specifically

whoever uses them commits perjury and now they've got a much bigger charge to worry about. And I

thing I said is show me the witness that can testify to the penalty or perjury, but obviously

In this affidavit, you're going to certify under penalty of perjury that you are of sound

The purpose of the affidavit is you're swearing under penalty of perjury you were there.

swear to the following, swear or affirm the following under penalty of perjury that I

I would prepare a set of criminal charges against these people, accusing them of slander, harassment, and filing a false report, and aggravated perjury.

Arrasment, aggravated perjury. You're in Illinois. What are the election laws concerning candidates?

You go to the prosecuting attorney with criminal accusations against them for aggravated perjury, for there's going to be some law concerning a candidate for public office.

Aggravated perjury.

Okay, so all of them aggravated perjury, criminal complaints.

and that the affidavit is made under penalty of perjury.

with perjury for making it.

Well, in writing, you know, I have some issues with my employer, and they had committed perjury

that would seem to abdicate the contract, an act of aggravated perjury.

But by operational law, it's really legal because we got the perjury clause there.

Otherwise, they'd get me either way committing perjury,

and therefore it's a violation, it's a crime to violate perjury.

This was a criminal matter. I filed a complaint against him that he committed perjury.

Perjury is not criminal?

You filed a claim that the attorney committed perjury with the professional governing agency,

I think we've got to start, Randy, doing more work on perjury of oath.

Article 12 of the Colorado Constitution says that if they're convicted of perjury,

And it also mentions subordination of perjury.

...perjury, yeah.

and then you're going to ask the judge to arrest the clerk for aggravated perjury

then you can come after them for perjury.

but on the other hand, you know, you're requiring me to fill out an application under penalty of perjury

And not only that, the clerk is, has just committed perjury also.

Well, not only perjury, okay, on the bottom of that says that my act or whatever the violation

We've got a clerk that's committed perjury.

are committing perjury and they don't even want the police to know that, or the people

to know that the police are committing perjury.

lie and commit perjury.

Why didn't your attorney object and charge them with perjury on the stand?

the charge of perjury.

Well, at this point, I just want people to understand that the police commit perjury

and charging these officers with perjury on the witness stand at the time during the trial,

You better start charging these guys with perjury right now or I am going to sue your

Whoever made... You need to know whose signatures on that complaint and file aggravated perjury

charges against them. Aggravated perjury. They're trying to trump up charges is what they're trying

that was not the case. So he's either committing perjury through the signing of the contract

or he'll be committing perjury in court if he testifies that way.

hearing then they did the last hearing then you can charge them with aggravated perjury

perjury in the original hearing and the judge actually bought my issue in this case that

assessment document under penalty of perjury did they no too damn bad for that individual again

and his story under perjury.

You need to charge them with malicious prosecution, aggravated perjury, look up the statute first

tampering with the evidence, aggravated perjury.

They sent me a... This is what they did. They sent me an affidavit telling me that they certified under penalty of perjury that they sent me 138 letters saying that they substituted the...

They sent me documents under penalty of perjury, decimated.

aggravated perjury, now it's not enough to go after that judge with a judicial conduct

aggravated perjury is a felony in most states and just because he's a judge he has no immunity

for perjury, but you cannot be sued, period.

So long as they don't commit perjury, if I have reason to believe and do believe that

One of the things she's saying right here, if there's any rebuttal to this affidavit, it has to be made within three business days under penalty of perjury.

order with over 200 counts of perjury in it in which she just simply lied her behind off

Then before I contact, first I file a last date against them and teach them of perjury

Well, I filed this affidavit accusing him of perjury and treason.

That goes to aggravated perjury.

Okay, so I submitted a form statement. Oregon Rules of Sovereignty stated that I can submit a form statement that's not notarized as long as I put that statement at the bottom of it under penalty of perjury.

Well, it can only be signed under penalty of perjury if someone verifies it.

But they can't say that you're swearing under penalty of perjury just by signing it and then hold you on account.

You can declare something under penalty of perjury.

And when you take it, they want the employees to submit a waiver that they're not going to hold the company responsible and that you attest on an affidavit under penalty of perjury that you're taking the vaccine voluntarily.

In my opposing their motion papers, I had a affidavit accusing the opposing attorney of perjury

and also accusing the other officer of perjury.

He danced around the subjects, and he danced around my accusations of perjury,

That's sufficient to charge them with aggravated perjury. Have you filed criminal charges against them?

And I'm like, you know, I tried to object and say, you know, I need to talk, I need to, you know, I'm accusing this guy of perjury, don't let him talk.

He's lying to the court and I'm accusing him of perjury.

Well, definitely. And definitely will to that. But he also moved, he's like, I moved to strike the pleading for perjury.

Well, the thing is, Brian, is when you have the guy on the stand that committed the perjury, let him talk.

Because you get to cross-examine him on that perjury and show that he committed it.

by lying to the court, committing perjury before the court, or it may be more appropriate to go after the attorney in the civil sense

And go ahead and file criminal charges against the attorney for aggravated perjury and against the judge.

committed, then that makes it aggravated perjury.

of perjury that day.

So just make an affidavit, get it notarized, sworn to under penalty of perjury that I'm taking this out of your hands.

says I certify and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington

Okay and it cannot be signed under penalty of perjury unless it is sworn to in front

of somebody authorized to administer that oath it is not signed under penalty of perjury.

That's true even of an IRS form. The only way you can sign it under penalty of perjury

of penalty of perjury when they tick somebody off because the other individual they ticked

off could just sign their name to some document under penalty of perjury. So why would they

of perjury that everything in it is true and correct.

The criminal complaint in these conditions can't be signed under penalty of perjury

to be an affidavit has to be signed under penalty of perjury.

The complaint is not signed under penalty of perjury.

The complaint cannot be signed under penalty of perjury because it does not require the

lo and behold, it says under penalties of perjury and you got to sign the thing.

Okay, let me explain perjury.

So if you misstate a fact that's not material, that is not perjury.

The only time something is perjury is when you misstate a material fact.

absolutely cannot be construed as perjury.

You would have no, no problem with perjury on a general question of that nature.

of perjury that what you stated in your document is true and the only thing they are notarizing,

the affidavit is insufficient to support the claim of aggravated perjury against them

court concerning a material fact that's aggravated perjury that's also

And that that they had to produce a witness who could testify under penalty of perjury that I had injured them and or damaged the property.

Oh my. Well, this sounds like it's time for criminal charges against the tow truck company owners or whoever is signing these bogus affidavits. They're lying under penalty of perjury.

Exactly. It's definitely, it's perjury, it's fraud, and they know what they're doing is illegal.

to have to face the perjury-style thing?

It's not perjury.

perjury, that's what I've heard, but.

perjury, and sometimes there's a penalty of perjury on the criminal complaint also.

The state of Kansas, Mr. or Mrs., has anyone from the state of Kansas built out a sworn complaint and signed to it under penalty of perjury other than the prosecutor attempting to act?

See who filed the complaint, who signed it, who swore to it under penalty of perjury.

Because nobody can file that complaint without committing perjury because nobody saw you do it.

Because whoever signs that complaint is committing aggravated perjury because no one

And in their affidavit, I count at least 14 perjury statements.

You have evidence of aggravated perjury.

That should get aggravated perjury charges against.

Yes, I'm putting aggravated perjury charges

So there's a pretty significant number of aggravated perjury counts

That makes his swearing out of that complaint an act of aggravated perjury on the complaint.

If you commit aggravated perjury and you recant your perjury before the perjury becomes obvious.

But before it's clear that the perjury will come out, then you can't be charged with aggravated perjury.

So that's the charge of the aggravated perjury.

the evidence under penalty of perjury and under oath.

By the person sworn in to give testimony under oath, penalty of perjury, supported by material

For example, I of such and such being fully duly sworn under a penalty of perjury

That you have to sign, you know, onto that under penalty of perjury.

is true and correct under penalty of perjury?

Verified motion is where you say everything I'm saying in here is true under penalty of perjury

Normally you're not going to be able to sue a witness if the witness believes what they're testifying to. If they are committing aggravated perjury, that's a criminal act and not necessarily a civil tort.

I mean, this guy was testifying under penalty of perjury to facts that he was alleging that

Okay. So that's aggravated perjury.

Does it say anywhere on there, I sign this under penalty of perjury where the officer

The criminal complaint does not have to specify under penalty of perjury because a hearsay

Okay, in the case of a traffic citation, does it meet all of the criteria that the statute says a charging instrument must have and then does the requirement exist that such an instrument must be sworn to under oath or penalty of perjury or something of that nature?

and as soon as the prosecutor opened his mouth I said objection perjury

It's aggravated perjury.

Aggravated perjury.

When did you commit aggravated perjury?

the penalty of perjury, that he is either the, or that his client is either the holder

They can't commit perjury on a document just because it's not going to be filed with the court.

They don't get to come in court and give different perjury testimony

So I'm looking at, effectively, a perjury request against him.

You really need to go after this officer, aggravated perjury.

Okay, then prepare criminal charges against her for malicious prosecution, tamper with government document aggravated perjury.

No, they engaged in aggravated perjury

Aggravated perjury

When somebody commits perjury, let them run with it

The thing with perjury, if they get an opportunity to retract

For instance, if you have reason to believe that these guys committed perjury

The guy down here trying to get me to have you arrested for aggravated perjury

Well, yeah, that and promise is under penalty of perjury including the fact that I will go home after three terms

You're committing aggravated perjury

I Randall Kalkin here and after referred to as complainant under penalty of perjury do state that I have personal knowledge.

to verify this document and not be committing aggravated perjury when the document, when

acted with intent to deceive and with knowledge of the statement's meaning for the purpose of prosecution for aggravated perjury under 37.03 of the penal code.

aggravated perjury, felony tampering with another document

So tell me, Officer Pringle, when did you commit aggravated perjury? When you wrote this citation and arrested me in a situation where you could only arrest me based on having personally seen or heard the offense being committed?

But before we went to the break, you asked me about perjury, an aggravated perjury.

Perjury, 3702 penal code.

Aggravated perjury, 37.03.

A person commits an offense if he commits perjury as defined in 3702,

It is no defense to prosecution under 37.03, Aggravated Perjury, that the death are mistakenly believed the statement to be immaterial.

So if you lie on an affidavit, that's perjury.

And file a complaint of Aggravated Perjury.

And then you come back and you move against them for perjury and you move to strike whatever testimony was made that was perjurious

You can recant perjury

If you can recant perjury, if you do it before the perjurious nature of the statement is made obvious by the evidence

On the spot, whenever there's something going down, you get video of it immediately on the spot, the whole thing, so that when they lie in court, then you can take them down for perjury.

Oh, well then. Okay, Randy, explain to me what constitutes aggravated perjury as opposed to just perjury.

That is a good question. Aggravated perjury goes to lying about a material fact. And to state the difference between the two, I'd have to go back and read the nuance of the code.

That's a material fact. That's aggravated perjury.

Aggravated perjury, that's a first degree felony. I'm sorry, I think it's a second degree felony.

Even though, you know, he stated that that was aggravated perjury because that was a material fact.

That's aggravated perjury.

That's aggravated perjury.

If he states he has personal knowledge when he doesn't, that's aggravated perjury.

And if this guy prepared a document and testified to his personal knowledge and stated facts that were not in his personal knowledge, that's aggravated perjury.

If he committed perjury, he did it on purpose with full knowledge of the culpability or the nature of his act.

Well, there's perjury and there's aggravated perjury.

Perjury, when you come from record, that you know it's false with the intent that it's taken as genuine.

They call it perjury.

We have a perjury statement.

Okay, that's really, yeah, that goes to defamation, but that's not perjury.

That's not going to go to aggravated perjury.

Okay, then those are opinions they won't go to, they won't go to perjury.

You can only commit perjury by falsely testifying to a material fact.

And if I go in there and I falsely testify that I'm 39 when I'm really 63, and it don't make any difference to the case, there's nothing to do with the case, that's not perjury.

If I put something on a document that's not sworn to, and even if it's material, that's perjury.

If I put something on a document that is sworn to and file it in a court, that's aggravated perjury.

Or if I testify in a court to something that's untrue, and it is material, that's aggravated perjury.

So neither of these go to perjury, and in a divorce proceeding, neither of them will actually go to slander, because this is one person's opinion.

We've lost Costner a year because of avoidance of service, concealment of evidence, perjury

and suborning of perjury by Defendant Council as well as enuminal delay tactics.

And she's filing criminal charges against him for perjury, for signing the document when it wasn't true.

law to see if it's aggravated perjury if the party lies to you.

It's aggravated perjury if he lies to the court.

That being said, you are swearing to the reason that you're asking for the continuance under penalty of perjury.

If you want to purchase a firearm from an FFL dealer, you have to certify under penalty of perjury that you are a U.S. citizen.

And yes, you have to attest under penalty of perjury that you are a U.S. citizen, but they will not sell you the gun.

and angry the perjury.

Official misconduct, aggravated perjury.

and they come and repeat that, that's not perjury.

That may be negligence, but it's not perjury.

The fraudulent conversion, illegal conversion, aggravated perjury, felony tampering with the government document, and executing a document by deception.

Is it signed as being true and correct under penalty of perjury by someone at the taxing

penalty of perjury in order for you to disqualify that judge, but you can make the verbal motion

and that doesn't have anything to do with perjury.

so they're not involved, and you could not be charged with perjury for coming to the wrong conclusion,

and it even says so in their stupid police report, would you file a use of them by aggravated perjury?

Okay, that's okay. No, you wouldn't file aggravated perjury against the assistant district attorney.

You would file subrogation of perjury, subordination of perjury.

That's the term for somebody who helps someone else commit perjury.

And if the suit's in place, file for discovery, and ask for a complete accounting of all his costs, he's not going to want to do that because if you find anything incorrect in there, that's aggravated perjury.

That should have got aggravated perjury.

I think that's about it. I just want to make sure I got this right. Go after the Beck's attorney for aggravated perjury.

had under oath, thus committing aggravated perjury and did so with specific malicious

and it's on the dateline of 48 hours where Jerry Trump confessed during the habeas hearing that he committed perjury.

He committed perjury and he said he did it because he was aided and abetted by Prosecutor Crane to lie about his witness testimony.

Well, if that's the case, well, people don't realize that if you commit perjury in Missouri in a murder case

Well, is he being prosecuted for perjury right now?

And, both the witnesses have said that that was definitely not Ryan. One of them, Jerry Trump, saying that he committed perjury,

a felony, not false filing, but where you lie in your affidavit. Perjury. Perjury, yes.

Felony perjury. And the document that is a cloud of dots for the signature of both attorneys.

file. If we're back to the plural implying that you can't go after this person for perjury,

Okay. But as far as perjury or anything like that, there's nothing of that nature. So long

No, that's where I was going to. If the statement made under oath that was false is not material, then it doesn't go to aggravated perjury.

So it's not aggravated perjury. You can't go to perjury with it.

And if it's irrelevant, then you can't claim perjury.

That's the way I would read it and either you don't owe any money or the judge tampered with the document and committed aggravated perjury.

And that the lieutenant or sergeant actually threatened me and said, well, you can make out a sworn statement and I'll have you arrested for perjury

Are these criminal complaints supposed to be signed under penalty of perjury?

Well, yeah, we have to do that as part of our job. So someone pays you to sign a document under penalty of perjury that all the information in it is true and correct.

So my friend's second question could have been then in order to protect the integrity of the court, I would move the court to charge this gentleman with contempt of court, perpetrating fraud upon the court and aggravated perjury because he's made statements under oath during an official proceeding about facts that are relevant to that proceeding, their material.

Then my friend could have simply said, well, judge, that being the case, I am placing this gentleman under citizen's arrest for third degree felony aggravated assault, or I'm sorry, aggravated perjury.

That constitutes the crime of aggravated perjury.

Who signed and swore under penalty of perjury the information and the ticket was true and correct?

Well, it was attached to a ticket and it states the cop stated under penalties of perjury.

And in some cases, and it wanted me to sign an affidavit swearing under penalty of perjury

So I went back to them and said, look, you guys want me to sign this under penalty of perjury saying I understand it.

by me repeatedly throughout the case, you know, sworn under penalty of perjury stuff

the affiant must swear under the penalty of perjury of the laws of the state of California

So they had to commit outright perjury and fraud in the Third Court to the 90.

finding that under penalty of perjury. Oh no, we don't do that. I found that very interesting.

it is material and the statement of fact is untrue, that's aggravated perjury. But normally

The first thing you do is you prepare a set of criminal complaints against the officer for aggravated perjury, false imprisonment.

File aggravated perjury tampering with a government document against the officer malicious prosecution and false imprisonment aggravated assault.

Now, if you lie about the facts, you may be prosecuted for perjury, but you cannot be

well, that was a Texas corporation, that's aggravated perjury.

Sometimes it doesn't go to perjury, but what the court says is you cannot go into one court,

I want to go after him for aggravated perjury,

And we accused the buyer of the property of tampering with a government document, aggravated perjury and executing a document by deception

executing a document by deception, tampering with the government document, aggravated perjury.

And aggravated perjury.

And possibly even getting charged with aggravated perjury in the process

perjury for you. That's a big deal. That'll get him in prison for quite a while.

So he will say okay and he will call this guy and he says, hey, this guy just sent us a complaint wanting us to arrest you for lying to the court, for tampering with the government document and aggravated perjury.

See, because the way they worded it in the affidavit, it says that so-and-so, the affiants were under perjury or everything, that they have first knowledge of that account.

And in that affidavit, he claimed under penalty of perjury that they had never received any written communication from me prior to that lawsuit.

Texas law specifically requires that the tax assessed must be signed under penalty of perjury.

that they violated, but I put the criminal code, the perjury, the, um, uh, trampling with evidence.

And what I want to ask you about is if there is a criminal charge against you, you know, state of whatever versus so-and-so, if there's a criminal charge against you, can you counterclaim that with criminal charges for perjury, whatever they've done?

Well, it's because they committed perjury when they were in trial.

What you do is you file perjury charges against some criminal charges.

And then you come back and say, because they committed perjury, their perjury harmed me this way and denied me due process.

But you can be sued for it. Okay, I'm sorry. Let me back up. You can't sue the other side if in the process of making a criminal accusation, they committed perjury.

to swear under penalty of perjury that all this is correct. Most of them don't have that

All right. That was the other reason I was calling tonight was not to go ahead and remind you of my whole saga over the few months that I called, but I have particularly wanting to file the criminal charges for the perjury, or as you've called it, aggravated perjury.

I like that. It'll only be aggravated perjury if the fact was material to the outcome of the case.

Okay, then that would go to perjury. It would go to aggravated perjury if you could show that the fact that he did or did not know who the owners were was material to the outcome of the case.

Okay, file against the lawyer for perjury and file a bar grievance against the lawyer. You might consider a malpractice suit against the lawyer.

There's no way out of it because he already swore under penalty of perjury that he did it

But I've got the lawyer for Bank of America swearing under penalty of perjury that my mortgage was assigned to Bank of America on July 28, 2009

I've got the fraud closure attorney Susan C. Little swearing under penalty of perjury that I defaulted on my mortgage in January of 2009

these attorneys executed it supposedly before a notary and they swore to all of these things under penalty of perjury.

then the people whose names appear on them committed aggravated perjury, tampering with governmental records,

And best way – I found the best way to respond to that is to say, well, if he's – you know, if he's swearing that in an affidavit, you need to be looking at him for perjury and you don't need – you don't need me.

that means I can file charges against the district attorney for, what, perjury?

And it's the document you're asserting is perjurious. So essentially, he's admitted to the perjury that you claim.

is I'm trying to get somebody who lied in court nailed for perjury, all right?

or get charged with the perjury

If they filed a motion that contained assertions of fact that were not true, that's tampering with a government document, aggravated perjury.

If you file that document under oath, that's aggravated perjury. When you testify to a material fact that is untrue and intend that it be taken as true, that's aggravated perjury.

And 2204 is, I'm sorry, aggravated perjury. I forget which one it is. 36.

Aggravated perjury and tampering with a government document. Take those to the district attorney.

The aggravated perjury, Randi, the aggravated perjury is Texas Penal Code, Section 37.03.

That makes it aggravated perjury

Then there's no other way to read this document, but as far as tampered with the government document simulating legal process, aggravated perjury

contempt of court, aggravated perjury.

Aggravated perjury tampered with the government document.

perjury. And the judge said, I will allow the question. Okay. So whatever they do,

You go down and file aggravated perjury charges against the officer,

to ask opposing counsel for the record, on the record, under penalty of perjury, I asked

I might be able to be prosecuted if I commit aggravated perjury.

So I went down to the courthouse to have the perjury charges and saw a judge.

and in petition for, you know, file aggravated perjury charges against whoever did that.

No, no, file a complaint with the district attorney accusing them of aggravated perjury.

how often they bother going after perjury cases that are not criminal?

And I said, man, this is subordinated perjury here. And she said, well, just go to that state website and start there.

I asked a posting counsel for the record on the record on the penalty of perjury.

That's where perjury comes to mind.

It is not trial de novo for the purpose of shielding this officer from aggravated perjury charges.

So we will look forward to their affidavit, because we will be looking forward to aggravated perjury, failure to speak with candor to the court.

And the affidavit is under oath, so that goes to aggravated perjury if they're not careful.

trust. It went into the perjury in the assignments and the appointments. It went

Mine's on perjury charges in Utah and I'm down in Texas

Oh, they charged you with perjury

Yeah, they charged me with perjury

And he's up in New York State and we've been indicted for perjury

Okay, five, so five indictments, aggravated perjury, felony indictments, you'll go away a long time

in court, committed perjury.

Yeah, and what they're getting there, they said we committed perjury

How is that perjury?

What are they saying amounted to perjury?

There's another one too. It's a felony, aggravated perjury.

Well, if they claim they transferred the beneficial interest, when in fact the beneficial interest is held by a trust, I call that aggravated perjury.

Now, what I mean is aggravated perjury.

He would commit aggravated perjury, violations of candor toward the tribunal, but he does

She's committing crimes, and there's names for those crimes, such as aggravated perjury,

not for the purpose of shielding the officer from aggravated perjury.

Tampa was the government document aggravating perjury.

Yeah, and what they're getting there, they said we committed perjury

Wait a minute, how is that perjury?

What are they saying amounted to perjury?

There's another one too, is a felony, aggravated perjury. Something I do admire about all of

is held by a trust, I call that aggravated perjury.

and he committed perjury like three times.

I said, besides Judge, I said, your trooper there committed perjury three times,

and I'm still waiting for you to, you know, hold him for perjury here.

To charge the prosecutor with aggravated perjury

Take a verified criminal affidavit accusing the prosecutor of aggravated perjury

to escape perjury. Affidavits are supposed to be drafted on firsthand personal knowledge.

That act of having the document acknowledged by a notary where the affiant swore on his oath before the notary to the veracity of the statement of the document was an act of aggravated perjury.

And the perjury was evident on the face of the document.

She also committed aggravated perjury because her affidavit was verified.

knowing that they lacked standing to represent a non-existent client. That's aggravated perjury.

Those are penal crimes. File criminal charges against them for aggravated perjury tampering with the government document.

How is it wrong? What makes it wrong? Statute on aggravated perjury, statute on tampering with the government document is what makes it wrong.

And in this case, we're charging those who prepared verified affidavits with aggravated perjury tampering with a government document because their affidavits were fraudulent.

That's aggravated perjury.

3703, aggravated perjury.

by deception, aggravated perjury, tampering with the government document for the purpose

deception, aggravated perjury, the whole smear.

long as you don't commit aggravated perjury, so long as you state the facts succinctly

and intended that they be taken as true as aggravated perjury.

by deception. 3703, aggravated perjury. 3711, tampering with the government document. Did

radio or television if you didn't own anything. 1621, perjury. Commercially interrupted.

to do what they did. I was up to 18 USC 1621 perjury. They have an oath to hold the Constitution

So that's going to go to aggravated perjury tampering with government document on every one of those

Aggravated perjury, tampering with the government document, all these are felonies

of perjury and that had the effect of denying your son due process.

Which is why I filed a criminal complaint against him with the DA for aggravated perjury

But if you have both of them, that's subordination, a perjury on the part of the prosecutor, aggravated

perjury on the part of the police officer, and denial of due process by the judge.

...a document, but that would also go to perjury, but...or would it?

With perjury, you need something definite.

If the person committed perjury, for the most part, that's irrelevant as to the validity.

That's aggravated perjury.

If the company's out of business, then we can go to perjury, go to tampering with all

Here's how the code goes on aggravated perjury.

That's sufficient for a claim of aggravated perjury.

officer for aggravated perjury.

That's aggravated perjury.

Aggravated perjury, 3710, I believe.

Perjury is just before tampering.

steering and executing a document by deception, aggravated perjury, death,

Aggravated perjury, tampering with the government document

The reason for it is, is because that's the only place where perjury can be committed

from perjury. Correct.

That's why Texas law requires that the tax assessment be done in person by the inspector and be signed under penalty of perjury that is true and accurate.

committed aggravated perjury by placing a statement on the document that was untrue

false and whether he actually knew or not he had imputed knowledge so aggravated perjury

um then he aggravated perjury is a felony here in the state of texas then he filed that document

knew or should have known was false and he placed it on there under oath under penalty of perjury

perjury he filed the document with a materially false statement and intended that the statement

You may have a shot at him for perjury.

Okay, wait a minute, in order for something to be aggravated perjury, the conflicting

aggravated perjury felony, tampering with a government document felony,

four counts of felony aggravated perjury,

of court, aggravated perjury.

Forgery and aggravated perjury brought upon the court.

on the record under penalty of perjury whom are you representing in court today are you representing

record on the records under penalty of perjury whom is mr wild representing representing the

the part where the officer is saying about the perjury.

No criminal complaint is required to be signed under penalty of perjury

Yes, we know that, but that's still not required to be under penalty of perjury.

And when your accuser comes on and testifies, you charge him with perjury

There's the perjury official misconduct

But if they did then I would charge them with perjury and official misconduct

Then you charge that accuser with perjury or official misconduct

as true knowing that they weren't, swore to them under oath, aggravated perjury, filed

All right, got two questions, one will be rehashing some of the perjury issues, but

Back to the perjury thing.

Now, of course, in dealing with this clown there's been a lot of perjury,

and of course, as we all know, perjury is covered in state statutes.

outside of income tax evasion, perjury is probably the most under-prosecuted crime in America.

Now, it would strike me that perjury is one of those kinds of things

How close do I got to get to complete abandonment of them ignoring perjury

to raise this thing as a nullity as far as perjury goes?

I don't think perjury or aggravated perjury is going to nullify anything

He's saying the prosecutors aren't prosecuting perjury,

so does that nullify the perjury law?

But because we've got this perjury statute, of course, that doesn't exist.

If they're not prosecuting for perjury,

because it's been nullified by the prosecutor, then you go to common law perjury.

But how do you get to common law perjury? How do you establish it?

referencing aggravated perjury, and I'm coming up with a big goose egg.

I'm finding aggravated assault, aggravated battery, but no aggravated perjury.

So here in Texas, there's a difference between simple perjury and aggravated perjury,

Aggravated perjury in Texas is a felony, as where perjury is not a felony.

Simple perjury is not a felony.

Perjury, I have the Wisconsin statute somewhere,

The perjury statute, it's pretty clear, and the charming gem in this whole thing is

That's why we have criminal penalties for perjury.

penalty of perjury, which everyone knows a criminal complaint is not.

of perjury.

There's no jurat and it's not sworn to under penalty of perjury despite the fact that there's

Then since the officer never initiated the stop until you entered the parking lot of the second business, if that is the case, now he's committed perjury.

I mean, he'd still be guilty of perjury, wouldn't he?

What was the conditions and what was the perjury?

But the problem is without that you don't have a timeframe reference for the receipt versus the testimony to prove that it was perjury.

articles of agreement, or release of mortgage a certificate signed under penalties of perjury and fraud by said mortgagee,

i.e. the perjury in the court we're just going to treat it as okay?

He commits aggravated perjury or simple perjury, but he cannot lie.

Well, I can't really touch the perjury per se because perjury is a criminal issue

They commit ethics violations. They commit perjury. They fail to speak with candor to the court.

So, if you're sitting in this court and you observe a lawyer lying to the court, and that's aggravated perjury, if he lies about a material fact,

It steps up to the line of contempt, but it certainly goes all over aggravated perjury.

And if he puts it in his pleading, it also equates aggravated perjury.

This is how perjury works. If there are two inconsistent statements, one mutually exclusive of the other, in an allegation of perjury, you don't have to prove which one was perjurious, only that one must have been.

The one said they didn't exist. The other said they did exist. Both of the statements were material that should get an aggravated perjury accusation.

if it be spoken in open court or in his pleadings, then what you call that is aggravated perjury.

But that wouldn't go to perjury anyway.

What goes to perjury?

It doesn't have, I'm not, you're going to perjury, but none of this has to do with perjury.

So you, and where did they commit perjury?

You're saying they committed perjury.

How did they commit perjury?

Perjury, I got a pretty good example from a security instrument, because security instrument

Because I got, I got listed perjury in a, in a, in a.

You got perjury.

In perjury, you do not have to prove which statement was perjurious.

then you've got that officer on aggravated perjury.

What a lawyer does instead is he commits aggravated perjury

Well, they just committed perjury

And on that slip of paper it says that I swear under penalty of perjury that I have rescinded my social security number and no longer use that number for any purpose

They're claiming you of committing perjury of some sort or putting your toes up to it.

Perjury, lying in court, perjury, for making false reports against me.

It's got to be sworn under the penalty of perjury that everything is within your personal knowledge and true, accurate, and correct.

Perjury falls on your shoulders because you made the statements that you could not afford it, and you showed financial records that attempted to prove that you cannot afford it, but yet you can.

The affidavit would go to aggravated perjury.

the statement will become apparent, then you can't be charged with perjury.

Okay. Very quickly. Penal Code Chapter 37. Perjury or other falsifications.

do since they're learned at counsel, they do not lie. They commit aggravated perjury.

This witness is committing aggravated perjury at this point.

Now remember, they're going to make you sign this thing in front of a notary under penalty of perjury.

penalty, it's a perjury. Okay. Stop, stop, stop. Wait a minute, wait a minute. This is jumping way

Under the penalty of perjury.

not for the purpose of shielding this officer from charges of aggravated perjury for lying

document aggravated perjury.

Expirated perjury is a felony in most states.

Either they committed aggravated perjury when they made the statement, or, I mean if they

Yes. And what I remember seeing, you thought that looked like aggravated perjury. Well,

the judge said frivolous. Frivolous has to what? Your accusation of aggravated perjury?

Well, I didn't make it aggravated perjury, but that what do frivolous superattacks?

perjury.

penalty of perjury, if I could be, you know, if I lied about anything, it's, you know,

property? Yes. Then that's suborning perjury right there. That is suborning perjury.

name and put someone on the stand to testify that it was, that's suborning perjury.

that's a morning perjury and that can send them to prison.

for committing aggravated perjury? And we'll either not show the video of what happened

will the perjury be on record?

And she may say something about the perjury, the obvious perjury or whatever.

I looked down and there was writing that talked about perjury.

Well, you can't prosecute them for perjury if they recant the perjury

before it's apparent that the perjury will come out if you recant.

So what I suggest you do is prepare criminal accusations of aggravated perjury,

prepare charges against the judge for subordinating perjury,

I was thinking if I don't raise my hand and I go into a jury room and I do that, are they going to be able to charge me with perjury or something?

As a matter of fact, in the traffic courts, it seems the courts prefer perjury to the

knowledge of the facts being asserted. An affidavit also must be sworn under penalty of perjury.

you have to sign it under penalty of perjury that the facts asserted are true and correct

penalty of perjury. Plus, it contains the qualifying statements, I have reason to believe and do believe.

So is aggravated perjury.

They commit perjury and aggravated perjury, aggravated perjury in the state being a felony.

The other thing is that an affidavit is valid only if signed under penalty of perjury.

So the prospect of the penalty of perjury should not be the overriding concern

you can be charged with perjury.

it becomes aggravated perjury.

you know, like I said, in someone else's name, that's perjury.

That's perjury.

should be sworn under the penalty of perjury.

lawyer for committing aggravated perjury in the courtroom?

perjury in the courtroom.

Committing perjury?

They commit perjury and they offer fraudulent misrepresentations of material facts, but they

If you kept on committing aggravated perjury or even perjury, that breaches their code

it says, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct

well he'd have to get indicted on a felony i guess um aggravated perjury okay he he presented

uh aggravated perjury being a felony now he can be indicted on that felony if that one attorney

there language in the affidavit that says that this is signed under the penalty of perjury

He is committing aggravated perjury.

Or he's committing perjury.

It may not be aggravated, but he's committing perjury.

Attorneys, on the other hand, commit perjury, aggravated perjury depending on how it's presented,

So since there's no penalty for lying, there are penalties for perjury, aggravated perjury,

So once they step across the line, you get to carry them back to the beginning and defeat everything. And if you go after this prosecutor for perjury and the judge for subordination of perjury, and that should be paid attention to.

Scratch that, take two. Okay, but subordination of perjury. If the lawyer testified, if he testified in the first place, that was improper.

In order for him to show that he was not under oath, he is tantamount to admission of perjury.

The only issue in the end is going to become, did he commit aggravated perjury or did he not?

perjury, aggravated perjury, I would go to the federal court and file an aggravated perjury

So I need to file a federal complaint, and we are talking about aggravated perjury.

And you might consider filing against the judge for suborning perjury.

Did you give the judge notice of the perjury?

a rescue for aggravated perjury.

Grieve them for aggravated perjury.

Second, a valid affidavit is nonexistent in law unless it is sworn under penalty of perjury, which we know a complaint is not and cannot do because it is not required to be signed by a person with competent firsthand knowledge.

Okay, and he suborned perjury, because who testified to the license?

He suborned perjury, and the witness committed perjury

He should go to jail for perjury.

They commit aggravated perjury?

Aggravated perjury, fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation of material facts, so on

aggravated perjury and I'll do that in the next talks I'll file if I do, but they were

Attorneys commit aggravated perjury, something to that effect.

Lawyers commit aggravated perjury.

But when a lawyer steps before the court and misrepresents a fact, that's not lying, that's perjury.

perjury as an affidavit.

He commits aggravated perjury.

At worst, he should get aggravated perjury.

to do with his weight, that may be perjury, but it's not aggravated perjury.

perjury.

Perjury, bribery, obstructing justice, harboring escape, false statements.

And actually it's not even perjury, but if he lies about something that's important to

And that's aggravated perjury because she's under oath.

So charge him with aggravated perjury.

He commits aggravated perjury all in one step.

Now we come back and say, well, we committed aggravated perjury when we did that.

Well, not only that, but under Pennsylvania law, aggravated perjury is grounds for recalculation.

Perjury.

Yes, perjury to get out of a traffic ticket.

So he asked, you know, I'm not sure if that's perjury or not, but you know, it could very

Yeah, the question I really have is the fact that it was a subordination of perjury situation

Yes. It's only perjury if it's material.

Perjury, how was the statement that this bank issued the credit card material to your case?

Okay, the point I'm making is that relying on an affidavit about a fact that's not material to the case is irrelevant. It's not aggravated perjury.

It's only perjury if you lied about a material fact, the fact that matters.

Okay. And it's only aggravated perjury if that was done with the intent to cause harm to the individual by the action.

And a false statement in that regard would be perjury.

And I said, objection, perjury.

So I said, objection, perjury.

aggravated perjury, 37.10 tampering with the government document, 32.48 simulating a legal

Did you file criminal charges for aggravated perjury against the prosecutor?

But could that be considered aggravated perjury since it's material?

facts were not present when he swore to the contents, he's the one committing perjury,

Now, they've committed aggravated perjury in a lot of ways on that citation if several

And as you know, that's subordination to perjury.

If they've committed aggravated perjury, then you can sue the lawyer personally.

You sue the lawyer for the aggravated perjury as though it's their fault.

However, if the lawyer commits aggravated perjury while representing a client, he does so to

by the other side and make claims against the lawyer for perjury against you.

Perjury go to fraud per se.

In your case, he went to the banker and suborned perjury

That's ordination of perjury at Section 1620.

What I'm looking for here is what constitutes perjury

and how we can turn that perjury into subordination of perjury.

that these people committed aggravated perjury

And here you have a judge suborning perjury.

That's the suborning perjury, 18 U.S. Code 4.

Is this perjury, is it perjury if it is a lie by omission?

are are actually perjury and I had put that in my motion before etc

All right, so previously I submitted notarized criminal complaints against a Department of Public Safety officer for aggravated kidnapping and aggravated perjury.

This is aggravated perjury, and we talked about this a few times.

Her name shows up in a federal document, five-year perjury for anybody filling it out, where

An affiant there has to be defined very loosely because, again, it's not actually sworn under penalty of perjury as to be true and correct

And if you swear to certain facts, then you have to do so under penalty of perjury

A complaint does not contain any language referencing a penalty of perjury because no one can be charged with perjury for making a complaint based upon what they believe may be the problem

But you can get charged with perjury, in fact when you sign the sworn statements that the police agencies or that the prosecutors get you to sign before them, at the very bottom it says under penalty of perjury

But it's just like we were talking about the aggravated perjury that the attorneys had committed.

and it's just clear and obvious, you know, perjury under those circumstances,

And if they stood by while their client perjured themselves, that's the born-in perjury.

Question, if I sue both, in fact, of the attorneys and their respective firms, I guess, for perjury in this case,

Just sue them for perjury or suborning perjury.

If I say perjury, he goes, yeah, I know what to do about that.

The lawyer committed perjury before the court.

The court had, if not actual, had imputed knowledge of the perjury.

The judge suborned perjury.

And if you look at the federal on suborning perjury, that's 18 U.S. Code 4.

And for a judge to suborn perjury, he ought to be ripped off the bench

and they commit perjury by not honoring their own.

If there's fraud in the state record or perjury, the federal courts will reopen it,

perjury or issue of the note, like you and I talked about, that wipes out everything, that's when they can actually hear a state judgment.

under the Pains and Penalties of Perjury and which displays a proper jurat.

and can swear at $200 penalty of perjury.

gotten in trouble for perjury.

I want to talk to that guy under penalty of perjury, under oath.

that he committed aggravated perjury because you weren't in commerce

Well, on this report, is this report signed and countersigned under penalty of perjury?

Okay. If it's signed under penalty of perjury...

You can be prosecuted for perjury

Now, if she committed aggravated perjury

If you misstate a material fact, now that's improper, that's aggravated perjury.

or aggravated perjury where he stated under oath that he had reason to believe and did believe he

And that, you know, later on the plaintiff's attorneys had actually committed aggravated perjury stating...

I have to sue the attorneys and I'm within the statute of limitations on that, but I have to sue the attorneys for aggravated perjury.

Well, I'm going to put all this together. It seems that it behooves me to try to look for an honest, malpractice attorney who actually doesn't tell me I can't sue the opposing attorneys for their aggravated perjury, and maybe I could work with that person.

You're going to have a tampering with a government document statement, every state has one, and aggravated perjury.

So it's a separate offense, the aggravated perjury. Does that make sense?

And so that dance is not to be lied to in court, dance is around the lawyer regulation perjury.

Wait a minute, wait a minute, are you talking about being lied to as opposed to aggravated perjury?

Being, well, aggravated perjury, I don't believe you can nail a attorney for perjury.

there's nothing in the statute that says you must be under oath to commit aggravated perjury.

You know it to be untrue and you intend that it be taken as true, that's aggravated perjury.

I have the Wisconsin Perjury and False Swearing Criminal Statutes.

Yeah, I'm looking at, you know, whether civil action for perjury, and I keep coming across that there's no action lies to recover damages caused by perjury in the majority of states.

No, no due process. So you look at the effect of the perjury.

You can't, you mean perjury on its face may not create a cause of action.

But if the jury believes you, and based on that lie, they render a ruling that then harms me, my claim is the harm caused by the perjury, not the perjury itself.

Yeah, the perjury did you no harm.

there are pleadings in that case which are perjurious that were made and that would qualify as aggravated perjury

I said aggravated perjury. I learned the term from you and Steve because he said lawyers don't lie.

Right up there in the front, subordination of perjury, you should read that one.

that's suborning perjury.

this is aggravated perjury, nobody seemed to get all missed about it.

And the court suborned that perjury after being given notice and evidence

The judge considered them anyway, then the judge suborned perjury,

later after the chain of events with aggravated perjury, the judge denying my right to due

Sure. That's tampering with the government document. Aggravated perjury.

Okay. This person is saying that he has capacity. Is that the perjury? He's saying he has capacity to take this action when he doesn't have this capacity.

Nobody takes them on that way. This is aggravated perjury tampering with the government document.

Tampering is generally a felony. Aggravated perjury is certainly a felony.

This is something that's only criminal and aggravated perjury and wrong and invalid and void on its face based on the law in the state of Arkansas from what I understand.

Now I'm wondering should I file a criminal complaint against him for perjury?

Should you file criminal charges against the officer the lawyer for perjury or did you say you or you say?

As a perjury and

So in this case, I assume I've got an aggravated perjury action

Okay let me explain that one, perjury in a judicial proceeding is privileged, and that's

Now if you commit aggravated perjury, you can be prosecuted for it, but that would be

This is what we were addressing, one exception was perjury and I was explaining why you can't

be sued for perjury, that's so you can get on the stand and you can testify without worrying

and then suborning perjury from that police officer as a judge in collusion with the city attorney, as the prosecutor,

But he's a born perjury.

I won in 2014, it was reopened through aggravated perjury and the judge being a accessory to

It's four subordination of perjury.

So it's the third statute goes to subordination of perjury.

obvious on its face, that's subordination of perjury.

That's ordination of perjury.

That sounds like aggravated perjury.

No, this doesn't really go to perjury.

He can't claim he is regardless. So with the judge adjudicating these allegations from a police officer, having to know that they are false and then suborning perjury from that police officer as a judge in collusion with the city attorney, as the prosecutor, we have a criminal conspiracy and collusion.

there's no jurisdiction, there's an affidavit that the attorney signed, there was a perjury

under penalty of perjury, notarized signature affidavit that Congress is committing treason

And if I pursue this, I'll have to pursue them for aggravated perjury.

They charged him with nine felony counts of making a false claim, filing a fraudulent document, tampering with a government record, perjury, you name it

it. And I said, well, you don't take your pick. Now we have aggravated perjury. I still

the judge that he was committing aggravated perjury and the judge didn't do anything about

the county judge, he changes his testimony, he charges him with aggravated perjury, and

Okay. You want to take a witness that could make sure whoever you take with you doesn't have a record and is able to sign affidavits under penalty of perjury.

Yeah, not to mention anything he would have asked a witness would have been some morning perjury.

You can do tampering, perjury, facial oppression, or in California it will be official misconduct.

If there was no stop sign where he said there was one, you charge him with aggravated perjury,

Once you get the judge's notice of aggravated perjury, you do that in the form of a verified criminal affidavit.

If the judge fails to act on your criminal notice and accepts the testimony, that's subordination of perjury.

And subordination of perjury is 18 U.S. Code 4.

That continuance must be signed under oath and penalty of perjury to be valid.

and there's nothing but ambiguity and basically aggravated perjury coming from the lawyers.

based on some aggravated perjury on the part of the plaintiff's attorneys.

It's one of those laws kind of like perjury in the courtroom.

perjury and have them all be parties here, I think.

You filed everything, verified pleadings, as long as you can make sure that everything you assert is a true and correct fact. Otherwise, you're going to get charged with perjury, too.

That's the whole thing with signing under penalty a perjury, regardless of what it is.

You should, not perjury, plagiarism.