Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

The only time the attorney general in Texas has original jurisdiction in a prosecution

Russell Mortland filed an appeal where we challenged the jurisdiction of the court for lack of a criminal complaint in a court record

Do the cops in Texas have any jurisdiction over that and is that a reasonable cause?

But then an unusual thing happened is the federal government stepped in and they did a petition to intervene. And so they intervened in the case and removed it supposedly, but they didn't have jurisdiction because it was in the state court.

A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a state court except as expressly authorized by act of Congress or were necessary in aid of its jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate its judgments.

See, he didn't have jurisdiction at all. So it's not necessary to aid of his jurisdiction because he just flat didn't have any. There was a state court hearing set and he told the state court not to let me plead anymore, the son of a bleep. What do you think about that crap?

which includes subparagraph 17, which of course limits their jurisdiction in states to where there's a legislative session of territory.

Nahls, the letters, it stands for North American Historical Law Society, the first letters, nahls.org. That's it. And you'll find that the Butler case is the key. When you go into a jurisdictional motion and say the federal government doesn't have any jurisdiction in the state, because the federal government is limited under Article 1, Section 8, subparagraph 17,

So what does it say? They go back to the U.S. versus Butler for the jurisdiction of the federal government.

Wait a minute, you sound like Ralph Winnerud now. You're so general. If I'm getting this right, you're saying that the states have zero jurisdiction over anything. Is that what I'm getting?

he'll reduce the complaint to an information submitted to the court of jurisdiction along with the criminal complaint.

and that's what gives jurisdiction to the court.

and determined that it rose to a level to invoke the jurisdiction of the court,

Now, we presented case law where a challenge to the jurisdiction was made for lack of a criminal complaint in the court record.

It says, we examine the court record and find no complaint bestowing jurisdiction on the court.

and that complaint gives the magistrate subject matter jurisdiction for the purpose of an examining trial and that purpose only.

And in getting to that, I'm gonna walk through the basic due process of how jurisdiction goes to the court.

These documents give the court jurisdiction for the purpose of holding and examining trial.

So what the courts said when they saw this, they said, holy mackerel, everybody loses jurisdiction at this point.

So they said, well, in that case, the magistrate has jurisdiction until the time of indictment.

because a magistrate can only have jurisdiction for the purpose of holding an examining trial.

So whether he had jurisdiction after that or not, there's nothing he's allowed to do.

The International Criminal Court says it has no jurisdiction over Israeli forces in Gaza.

To see if the documents were sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

The documents did not invoke the jurisdiction of the court

yes and just just one quick statement whenever I go into a jurisdiction and I

is trying to enforce an ordinance and in what jurisdiction are they trying to

that the commissioner's court passed, and they extended their jurisdiction under the, what is it,

I am not a citizen of the United States under the jurisdiction thereof or subject to the

subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

advocacy jurisdiction of everything falling under commerce, what it really is if you start

this deals with jurisdiction that's outside of Annex Municipality.

This JP, okay, apparently has some jurisdiction at the county realm, but this has nothing

Now I have evidence that at this point in time, the court was without jurisdiction because there was no warrant.

They passed a law recently in Texas that a policeman from any jurisdiction in Texas,

Due process violation or subject matter jurisdiction makes it go away.

jurisdiction from the beginning, ab initio.

Then they have to serve, that invokes the subject matter jurisdiction of the court. Then they have to serve process, that's the summits that has to be served on the person who's the defendant, the person supposed to pay the mortgage.

So the court's subject matter of jurisdiction wasn't invoked, and then I believe, too, wasn't the service of process insufficient?

pointing out that the judgment should be vacated because the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction or there was no service of process sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction.

Yes, the subject matter jurisdiction may be challenged no matter how remote in history.

And I gave this challenge to the jurisdiction to Robin.

I go for the criminal because I just go straight from the jurisdiction and attack them.

and it is enough to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

you know he would have to have it within the county because that's the only place his jurisdiction exists

so they're both under the same rule so yeah he only has jurisdiction within the county so it would have to be

for acting without subject matter jurisdiction in this case.

When jurisdiction is challenged it must be proven.

If he fails to prove jurisdiction then he has no jurisdiction and in this case he failed

They're going to challenge my jurisdiction in a little more forceful manner.

You can sue the judge if he acts without subject matter jurisdiction or in personam jurisdiction,

within the jurisdiction by the use of all lawful means, to issue all process intended aid in preventing suppression of crime

jurisdiction though revert back to municipal court

jurisdiction on a traffic ticket can they? No

They lose subject matter jurisdiction until a magistrate makes a probable cause determination.

jurisdiction or even a big-time jurisdiction, some major metropolitan area, whatever, where

that's fair warning to the judge that I'm going to pull you out of this jurisdiction and take you to the federal courts

They didn't know he didn't have jurisdiction in the county courthouse.

You have no jurisdiction here.

I told her I only use that one to punish a jurisdiction anyway.

jurisdiction of the court.

Now if I challenge it, they convert no jurisdiction to the court because it's not signed, it's

it's printed that way, whatever jurisdiction they worked for, they acted in concert and

...and where they have this jurisdiction and how they can disregard what is clear constitutional rights

But he's also going to know that he has no jurisdiction over you. So he can't do anything

got if they see you 400 yards outside the jurisdiction they have jurisdiction that far

street but then the other jurisdiction commit a crime. They have jurisdiction 400 yards in. Here

follow you from their jurisdiction into another jurisdiction then they can stop you. If they're

jurisdiction you won't get. However what was the nature of the probable cause of stop? Actually

If you're, if you're challenging your, the jurisdiction of the court,

an appeal is inappropriate here because they never had jurisdiction to start with.

challenging jurisdiction and they, and the court says, no, we have it. And you say I'm appealing

where's your jurisdiction to begin with? You don't have any. Yeah, subject matter. Yeah,

I believe, which, if they had jurisdiction within the state, might apply. But looking at state codes

So if he's within the jurisdiction of the state, and it goes to hierarchy of law, if he's a fed

Of what jurisdiction is

And jurisdiction is at any court

An issue of jurisdiction comes up like

Or the court has no jurisdiction to hear it

Judge, you do not have subject matter jurisdiction in this matter

But as long as the judge adds jurisdiction over you, you're going to have to get past that.

He has to lose jurisdiction some other way or anytime somebody wanted to get rid of the judge,

he's already lost jurisdiction of the case anywhere.

As soon as they exceed their authority, they may have lost jurisdiction anyway.

pleading the jurisdiction motion to dismiss is moving the court,

You see, so far, as best I can tell, they have no jurisdiction in this thing.

And since you challenged jurisdiction and he hasn't answered or hasn't proven,

Finally came back and said that he didn't have authority to rule that the municipal court never had original jurisdiction because they had a defective complaint.

No, but I did just get jurisdiction area the other day.

that surrounds the jurisdiction wherein the federal territory exists, you can migrate the state statute to the federal and prosecute him in the federal with the state statute.

So if there's a well established statute in another jurisdiction that addresses something our legislature has yet to address, then you can migrate a statute

The jurisdiction, whatever jurisdiction you're in, their law is the highest law.

matter jurisdiction when he violated laws relating to his office and moved to have the

When it goes to subject matter jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged

The thing I would want to find out is what jurisdiction the officer has concerning motor

any court that has essentially concurrent jurisdiction and has venue,

Now, the complication of all of this of where jurisdiction and venue comes in

If they get into jurisdiction and don't address venue first, they may have waived it,

because jurisdiction and venue are like captions in the front of your pleading,

The Texas cases, if the other party has a problem with what you've pled and thinks you haven't issued a cause of action, they generally don't move to dismiss for a lack of jurisdiction or for no cause of action.

except if you're trying to create confusion and animosity within the context of that jurisdiction in order to exit the jurisdiction.

No, keep in mind that they don't have any real jurisdiction over you.

The Sudanese government claimed the International Court lacks jurisdiction since Sudan is not

And that's like 125 or 175, depending on what the jurisdiction is to file the suit.

Because absent proper service, the documents do not invoke the jurisdiction of the court.

And if they did not serve you properly, they did not invoke the jurisdiction of the court.

Because in a criminal matter, the judge has jurisdiction over you.

That's what they must have to give them subject matter jurisdiction and it gives you a accuser

to the jurisdiction claiming that the court has no jurisdiction as there is no accuser.

If the judge is up there exerting jurisdiction when he doesn't have it, that's criminal.

It was the judge's duty to make sure he had subject matter jurisdiction before he attempted

Every case I've read on a challenge to the jurisdiction for a lack of criminal complaint

of the jurisdiction and so he had the sergeant call me

Well, I'd like to discuss how the court gets jurisdiction over you.

the way the judge gets impersonal jurisdiction is with a...

But at that time, the state has no jurisdiction until they reach you,

No, no, the court gets jurisdiction when the complaint is filed.

has no jurisdiction based on law.

the many states must give up jurisdiction for Title 8.

The federal government does not have jurisdiction on Fort Sam Houston

then the state has jurisdiction on the property as well as the federal government,

But if I'm outside the state, I don't know if I have a standing to go into a foreign sovereign jurisdiction and claim standing to report crime.

yourself to them is because first the political jurisdiction challenge comes in

Well, under certain circumstances, they don't have jurisdiction over you

or naturalized are citizens and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

But they gave me the policing agency of statewide jurisdiction that sets the pace for all other

the jurisdiction up to incredible potential litigation.

the grand jury, I can show every judge in the jurisdiction is a low-down, rotten, belly-crawling,

to transfer jurisdiction there

jurisdiction without those documents

a jurisdiction that had those

One of my favorites when I'm going into a jurisdiction is I'll ask to see the morning

because in no jurisdiction have I found the records in the court record

Depends on the statute, the state of the statute in the jurisdiction you're in.

So I'm kind of excited about that because it challenges your jurisdiction and states

And they said, okay, jurisdiction flows from the arresting officer, gives a complaint to the magistrate.

So they ruled that the magistrate has jurisdiction until indictment.

A magistrate has no jurisdiction to do anything but an examining trial.

the only court that has jurisdiction over tax issues is in Travis County.

And you can show they have no jurisdiction to act.

then the tax court in Travis County wouldn't have impersonal jurisdiction over me

There was an indictment so jurisdiction was done with.

He has to be certain that the pleadings before the court are sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

So the complaint the officer would attempt to file is insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

Well, he admits on the record that he didn't have jurisdiction to hear any amulty cases

And he says, put him in a file, but he didn't have jurisdiction to do anything with those

And I said, and he stated on the record, this is a multi-jurisdiction, he had no jurisdiction in multi-cases

He acted in retaliation that means he lost his jurisdiction or something?

He admitted that he never had jurisdiction from the start.

You can file the admission of no subject matter jurisdiction as judicial notice, not something

The first time due process is violated, then jurisdiction ceases and is no more.

Challenge to the jurisdiction based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction

to invoke the jurisdiction of the court,

in order to invoke the jurisdiction of the court.

Yeah, but how is it legal for one jurisdiction to obtain information and have it on file

and then another jurisdiction can just go and tap into that different jurisdictions database?

law this it has to get the federal funds must go through the local jurisdiction of the home

How about oath of office, being able to get the jurisdiction away from the court?

Randy, do you think that courts function in a dual jurisdiction being both under criminal and UCC at the same time?

A court gets jurisdiction statutorily.

No jurisdiction in the trial court.

Article 3 jurisdiction extends to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, and the treaties.

and Article 3 court has jurisdiction to entertain a case that sounds in,

and it has to be property that belongs to the control and authority and jurisdiction of the United States,

of competent jurisdiction in Travis County or in any other county where venue lies. Now

with jurisdiction in the county in which the municipality is located.

It appears they have a subject matter jurisdiction problem.

OK, now the defendant, how you didn't you didn't get me into admiralty jurisdiction because you haven't.

We were we were discussing this and maybe Brian has an answer for us about the jurisdiction in the national force.

Brian, do you do you know what this what the deal is with the jurisdiction of law enforcement inside the national forest?

The jurisdiction of the national forest is presumed to be under the feds, but there's a shared jurisdiction with local state and law enforcement in order so that the sheriff will have the ability to patrol federal land in a non rainbow gathering setting and arrest people who are committing crimes.

So that which is why a federal actor is not subject to any jurisdiction of a state court, not by a subpoena.

He's not immune from state jurisdiction because his job is a federal agent.

If the sheriff if the sheriff were out there and observed someone committing a crime, he has a concurrent jurisdiction where he can enforce the crime.

And whether or not you can get the prosecution to prosecute a law enforcement within that jurisdiction in any jurisdiction.

because people would argue that the feds have no jurisdiction inside the state boundaries anyway,

The feds have jurisdiction over every inch of land within the United States.

And so the federal government has jurisdiction over every square inch of federal land.

So I can get all of the documents that were submitted after PACER was born, but all the documents that were filed prior to the birth of PACER in that jurisdiction are not available through PACER.

one of the bases for federal jurisdiction is the aspect of deciding federal law.

It's not to be confused with the court or jurisdiction where you're suing them, but

Do you do a subject matter jurisdiction challenge?

the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

of the facts. But if, you know, federal jurisdiction also has what they call diversity of citizenship.

court has jurisdiction over the defendant, not necessarily diversity of

the jurisdiction is in Oregon, or in this case, Pennsylvania, can you sue in

jurisdiction issue rather than a sovereign jurisdiction issue. But that's

And I've always had a problem, I guess, with all the claims of the federal government having jurisdiction over everybody and everything.

If the crime was committed in this state in my locality against me that lives here in this state, how does the federal government get jurisdiction over anything?

The primary jurisdiction, and they most likely had in personam jurisdiction anyway,

that's the jurisdiction over the person as opposed to subject matter jurisdiction.

because I know jurisdiction is mostly state or county,

jurisdiction of the court.

jurisdiction of the court.

That's one jurisdiction allegation.

Second jurisdiction allegation is the fact

jurisdiction and to be free from unreasonable search

individual for the tort the state has exclusive jurisdiction to pursue

criminal affidavit the court is without subject matter jurisdiction and is has no more authority

It's physically positioned in Wise County, but it has jurisdiction over Jack County.

Well, that's one approach to it, most certainly. Let's see. Now the other thing though is what gives the court jurisdiction to even hear the case

It is specifically stated in the state constitution that it is the information or the indictment that grants jurisdiction to the court

So if you go by what the constitution itself states here in Texas, if only an indictment or information can grant jurisdiction to the court

The presentment of an indictment or information to a court invests the court with jurisdiction of the cause

Those two things are the only thing that grants the court jurisdiction of the cause

responsibility insurance comes under transportation code and that only has jurisdiction on the

You tell the judge why he has jurisdiction unless the case is already ongoing and it's

You want him to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction and then you step outside

Have a prayer, it has a jurisdiction section normally

Same heading, same ending, they all have a jurisdiction section, they all have a statement of facts

He had no jurisdiction to enforce a Canadian law

I guarantee you, you can have it thrown out for like a subject matter jurisdiction simply

That's the only time he's designated as the prosecutor of the original jurisdiction when it's a complaint against the county or district attorney

Home jurisdiction is a term that you would need to look up, but the title tells us this is doing information on a non-resident violator.

a jurisdiction of municipal court, a municipal court, including a municipal court of record, shall have exclusive original jurisdiction within the territorial limits of the municipality in all criminal cases.

Now, if you go a little further on, the municipal court shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the justice of a precinct in which the municipality is located in all criminal cases arising under state law.

They have no jurisdiction over you

You disqualify the judge for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because he's not a judge

How do they have in person of jurisdiction of you to properly place you before the court

To actually have jurisdiction over you to place you before the court

And subject matter jurisdiction is a lot better because it cannot be waived

And subject matter jurisdiction must come first

They first must demonstrate that they have jurisdiction over the subject matter

And then they have to demonstrate that they have jurisdiction over the individual personally

Yeah but I can't be in personum jurisdiction in this case

That gives the county in personum jurisdiction over me

Therefore, they are insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court

And I will maintain that it is the court's duty to prove up its jurisdiction before it attempts to exercise jurisdiction

Then the court no longer has subject matter jurisdiction until it proves that it has subject matter jurisdiction

Anyway, back to our original question of impersonal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction

So in going for subject matter jurisdiction I've got a lot of things I can deal with

matter jurisdiction over me.

matter jurisdiction of the court.

How to force the court to prove up its jurisdiction because that will be the next place I go

Because the documents before the court are insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

Okay, but he can still attack jurisdiction in standing

Now, if the complaint is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the magistrate, the complaint

including the conflict of laws rules of the jurisdiction issuing the certificate until the earlier of surrender of the certificate or four months after the goods are removed from that jurisdiction.

Okay. The last part of it just says, four months after the goods are removed from that jurisdiction and thereafter until a new certificate of title is issued by another jurisdiction.

and you challenge the jurisdiction of the court,

It demands whenever a jurisdiction gives me any problem when I'm trying to find a record

and take jurisdiction just like they did with Randy Weaver.

it's got the jurisdiction of the court and the limitation of actions,

allegation of bona fide jurisdiction because I have an arraignment on Tuesday,

He's got to file his documents in the court of the jurisdiction of the case.

Now, another aspect of a lot of things we discuss when it comes to federal rules is we don't apply what the Constitution says federal jurisdiction is.

But it is, it has to do with jurisdiction and what you give up when you are contracting with some type of entity

But yes, the limits of Federal jurisdiction is incredible

That real jurisdiction isn't there

of law that says exclusive appellate jurisdiction and what this is, just to catch everybody

jurisdiction, the term exclusive appellate jurisdiction as far as I can tell only appears

they're the agency of statewide jurisdiction and they pretty well set the tone for the

appeal is filed that court loses subject matter jurisdiction and this act was a

do not have jurisdiction on common law without a invitation by the property

arguments that are supposed to be under the jurisdiction of the trial court. So, Randy,

Pick your cards really carefully. Yeah, the only possible chance he would have to beat that is if he can prove that the court had no jurisdiction at all to begin with.

if PIRs come under the jurisdiction like it does in Texas of the Attorney General.

I would suggest that you have in effect challenged the jurisdiction of the court

to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

Basically, it's saying that they have no jurisdiction over anybody that filed it that has a problem in court.

that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to proceed with these

I've been just kind of skating along, just not allowing the court's interim jurisdiction by showing up.

Okay, a jurisdiction will not post a warrant on a computer that's further away

and they've said that the magistrate has jurisdiction until time of trial

So if you go to the court of jurisdiction and look for the citation,

but nothing specifically challenging jurisdiction in the court.

So subject matter jurisdiction falls by the wayside.

anywhere within the state, but their jurisdiction for writing citations is still limited to their own.

He can tell his officers what to do, but he can't tell officers from a separate jurisdiction what to do.

Principle one, lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action

Because if a matter includes a federal issue, only the feds can have jurisdiction over the federal issue.

one's jurisdiction has been challenged, and he kept cutting me off left and right.

insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

Are you going to challenge my jurisdiction or are you going to charge me with impersonating an officer?

it's my opinion that the best challenge to jurisdiction is a criminal complaint and motion to disqualify.

jurisdiction to do this.

this, even though they have no jurisdiction and they never have. Well, what you do is,

had no jurisdiction to proceed to begin with, the judge has committed a violation of law.

because the judge had no jurisdiction to issue it to begin with. Mandamus. Let me explain

to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court. And the court's responsible

thing. You have no jurisdiction, challenge the jurisdiction upfront. And they have never

then the pleadings in the case are not sufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

are insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court,

Let's get jurisdiction area.

So if they do not file an information in your case, they do not grant jurisdiction to the court.

So they've got multiple issues to deal with over jurisdiction all by itself.

to invoke subject matter jurisdiction to the court, and subject matter jurisdiction can

Randy just said subject matter jurisdiction can always be challenged.

That jurisdiction was in the county in Rusk

Took him to another jurisdiction to assault him

Like in the order I put in, it is hereby ordered that the court is without subject matter jurisdiction and the cause is dismissed.

Then he gets jurisdiction and he can hold me 90 days. And when that 90 days runs out, he can do it again and do it again as a woman in Arizona that's been in jail almost a year now.

Have you studied the jurisdiction dictionary course yet, Brian?

jurisdiction as a special appearance. If you challenge subject matter jurisdiction,

apple and I say, well, you don't have jurisdiction because this court only deals with oranges,

jurisdiction. What will go to subject matter jurisdiction is where the crime was committed,

jurisdiction. And to prove up jurisdiction, they have to show that the court has jurisdiction over

of service, the filing did not invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

where it is. So, what if in my first motion to challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of the

granted civil jurisdiction in Texas. They are criminal only. And only if that crime is

And from subject matter jurisdiction details, in each ticket, you've only got one minor

Failure to do so leaves the court without jurisdiction to hear the case, because a 1.14

state of criminal procedure says an indictment or an information bestows jurisdiction upon

jurisdiction of the offense who is in the municipality or county in which the offense

jurisdiction and had never ever had a hearing and then i went down on wednesday and supposedly

and that their service of process is improper and therefore they're hung because that doesn't invoke any jurisdiction and they can't prove it and you never get to the examining trial.

appearance which and you challenge jurisdiction now you're saying the citation is only in effect a promise to appear and once they appear there has to be an information or a charging instrument there's got to be something else well yeah that's a requirement simply because he's 100 percent correct

agenda 21 and for those of you who don't know why go to the website why his name is named that it's a story that I don't know yeah no okay he's calling in and I just got a text message there they're saying that they just want a case because the complaint did not meet the criteria to give jurisdiction so I want to bring Mike into the conversation here Mike hey go ahead hey Mike the camel has landed the camel has landed go ahead

you haven't given jurisdiction and you basically come after them with the fact that the citation is not a complaint, it is not a summons and that their process is insufficient

you've fulfilled your promise, now they have to prove their jurisdiction and they can't and they never will be able to.

Oh, well, you're right there. There's no argument on that point. They're flawed from the get-go because, one, first thing, they're issued against the party to which they do not apply. Subject matter jurisdiction is nonexistent.

Federal jurisdiction is very, very limited, and this would go against that.

The court has power to do that to keep the lower court from interfering with the jurisdiction of the higher court.

any action in the lower court would interfere with your action and potentially make your jurisdiction moot.

Subchapter B, jurisdiction and power, Section 27.031, jurisdiction.

If it is, then the JP court has no jurisdiction according to this section.

In addition to the jurisdiction and powers provided by the Constitution and other law, the justice court has original jurisdiction of,

In this case, it specifically says in sub-bottom one, civil matters in which exclusive jurisdiction is not in the district or county court and in which the amount in controversy is not more than $10,000, exclusive of interest.

Once a challenge to the jurisdiction is made, the court has to prove that it has jurisdiction.

So, and a challenge to jurisdiction can be made at any time.

So he can challenge the jurisdiction to the JP directly, and he can also be filing in the district court at the same time or previously, five minutes earlier, a restraining order against the hearing also.

He should have a challenge to jurisdiction in hand.

And a challenge to the jurisdiction since it can be made at any time it gets around the seven-day notice limit.

That moving ahead on the eviction when there's a question of jurisdiction will cause a harm that cannot be undone,

Therefore, the original pleadings are insufficient to invoke subject matter jurisdiction in the court.

This goes to standing. You challenge subject matter jurisdiction of the court,

If he doesn't have standing, then he cannot invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

The feds always want to take the jurisdiction because of the Randy Weaver case

And so that's therefore that's why the fed had jurisdiction in this case even though all the marijuana was grown inside California for one thing and for another thing it wasn't even commerce because the people that are growing it under state law have to donate it to the medical marijuana clinic.

When you file any motions, are you giving them jurisdiction so I can't challenge jurisdiction?

Challenge jurisdiction first thing.

but you're coming before them at arm's length to ensure your rights until a determination of subject matter jurisdiction is made,

I have to have subject matter jurisdiction as a matter of law.

You challenge jurisdiction first thing.

And it doesn't matter where inside that pleading a challenge to jurisdiction comes.

And also, I filed a pretty lengthy motion to dismiss election jurisdiction and all that.

The document is called The Secret of Special Maritime Jurisdiction as the PDF file.

challenges to jurisdiction and criminal charges against them

Now, my question is whether or not the maritime jurisdiction actually applies.

Wendy, I need to ask you something. What, I don't understand the purpose or the point or even the jurisdiction for that matter of turning yourself into Roanoke County if the warrant for your arrest is in Cherokee County. That doesn't make any sense to me.

And he warns me that this guy is really bad news. Well, so you're saying that the municipal police from Cherokee County plan on going to Roanoke County outside their jurisdiction to arrest you on a warrant for which you've already turned yourself in for and for which you've already had an examining trial?

Like a district court has jurisdiction within the limits of its district. And say a Justice of the Peace, he has jurisdiction within the county, but he only has venue within the limits of the precinct in which he has been elected.

So in order for me to establish venue, I have to be able to establish that some part of a crime I'm alleging occurred in the jurisdiction that I'm alleging has venue.

Okay, then, yeah, a challenge to the jurisdiction would – I don't know if you can do that.

the prosecution has jurisdiction unless they screwed up a point of due process.

Challenge to the jurisdiction if you can find one.

And I said, well, this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction in this issue.

and I'm insisting that the city doesn't have jurisdiction in the county courthouse,

The jurisdiction matters there, but maybe other people could articulate it better.

What I did think of reading in the Cornell write-up is part of what the jurisdiction issue was that I had called in about a week or so ago

on the Senate bill that isn't in the House yet for the jurisdiction matter regarding federal jurisdiction

Any drain, any stream, any creek, anything that eventually reaches the U.S. waters, the federal government is claiming jurisdiction over it.

Right, well, they might be trying to get around territorial jurisdiction by saying that they have some type of international precedence.

and the Feds have jurisdiction because no individual state can move out into the territorial waters.

And what they're trying to say is, is anything that runs into that, they have jurisdiction over.

kind of like how the jurisdiction from other states to other states being foreign corporations are dealt with in the corporations.

In any of your opinions, do I necessarily have to waive or have to have waived personam jurisdiction simply by letting the court know my name upon presence?

Now, unless you make a challenge that the court doesn't have personam jurisdiction because of the nature of your name, if you're making that argument, this may have relevance.

The court first has to have subject matter jurisdiction or jurisdiction within the territory, within the region, and now he has to have jurisdiction over you as the person.

That part's clear in law, and that's the non-sprotunque, and in personam jurisdiction to a large degree goes to a non-sprotunque in the proper venue or in an inconvenient venue.

If you live in a given county and there is a justice of the peace in that county, the justice of the peace has subject matter jurisdiction over class C misdemeanors.

However, if you don't live in his precinct, he doesn't have in personam jurisdiction over you, or even if you do live in his precinct, he has to be able to apply the law to you personally.

But if you go in there and accept that name spelled that way, even if they really meant someone else, then yes, you've given them in personam jurisdiction over yourself.

Yeah, in personam jurisdiction can be waived, so it's really important that you understand how the court gets in personam jurisdiction over you.

So, they never invoked the subject matter jurisdiction of the court and it wasn't your

matter jurisdiction of the court.

So you can claim Admiralty jurisdiction in your pleadings, which is what I did in my criminal complaint.

Wait, stop. How do I get Admiralty jurisdiction out of the air and down on the ground?

But at any rate, you establish the jurisdiction of the court by the sufficiency of your pleadings.

But maritime jurisdiction only exists if it exists as a matter of law.

So how do I invoke the maritime jurisdiction and pull it off the water or down from the air, down to the ground where the statutes normally live?

You invoke the jurisdiction of the court by the sufficiency of your plea. So if you claim maritime jurisdiction and you.

Yeah. Well, see, the problem with that is, is I can stand in Texas and claim Oklahoma jurisdiction all I want to.

But Oklahoma will never have jurisdiction in Texas because it doesn't buy law.

Maritime jurisdiction by law has to apply to the place I'm invoking it or it doesn't make any difference.

Well, that's what I was saying a while ago about the jurisdiction area stuff. If you study that and do your own reading and research, you'll know as much as 80 to 90 percent of these guys do because they certainly don't spend any time reading.

If you plead that the city is without subject matter jurisdiction for whatever reason it is,

So make absolutely sure you plead out your jurisdiction first.

The judge refused to hear that, said she had all absolute jurisdiction over the case.

And then we got into this little give and take about the local police not having subject matter jurisdiction within a county building.

I just want to say the reason why I ask if any of your techniques might be found in the Texas jurisdiction is because I actually asked that question

We need to establish what exactly the jurisdiction of the court is.

About halfway through my demur, asking the questions of jurisdiction and what have you,

Whichever one has original subject matter jurisdiction in this level of office.

If you're close to what that writ is, and the writ starts out with a statement invoking the jurisdiction of the court

Until he attempts to exercise the jurisdiction he didn't have,

This jurisdiction needs to be challenged at the first instance so you will tend not to be enmeshed in a trial.

What happened to the other gentleman that challenged the jurisdiction of the court?

And you, it's not a good idea to say you don't have jurisdiction to walk out on the court.

jurisdiction over me?

If a jurisdiction attempts to on a consistent basis exercising an authority, they are not

Well what do we do when they attempt to apply a jurisdiction to us that they don't have?

to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to be filed, which I am also going to integrate

they are acting without jurisdiction in the matter.

of jurisdiction for which he has been challenged.

The judge that is being challenged for jurisdiction cannot render a decision on that subject,

For recuse, yes, but now I've got Texas cases that show that when jurisdiction and Supreme

Court cases, in fact, when jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven and it must

gave me, when, when jurisdiction is challenged, it may not be presumed, it must be proven.

whether or not he has subject matter jurisdiction over that 3,000 pound tin can.

We were talking about subject matter jurisdiction and Eddie, I lost my place.

jurisdiction over me.

to subject matter jurisdiction be heard in accordance with law before any other matters

jurisdiction and anybody going to court needs to keep that firmly in mind because the courts

claim that you waived impersonal jurisdiction and they will pretend like it waives subject

matter jurisdiction and act as if it does, doesn't.

authority standing to invoke subject matter of jurisdiction in the court.

Where do you get subject matter of jurisdiction and how does the officer invoke your subject

matter of jurisdiction and eat us like a tied goat.

the subject matter jurisdiction for traffic stops and things.

Yeah, well, subject matter jurisdiction is going to apply in any court.

But if we challenge jurisdiction and he does have subject matter jurisdiction, he can certainly

And I've heard that there's case law that says once subject matter jurisdiction is challenged,

I appreciate your time and I'm really listening to the jurisdiction thing so I'm hoping to get back to you.

Calling today, first I guess I could have some insights into the matter of you guys were questioning subject matter jurisdiction earlier.

To actually get into what I would assert at that point is that they have subject matter jurisdiction you acquiesced.

It even looks like the Constitution does not give any of the three branches of government any jurisdiction over grand juries.

Then protect all the other issues as you go along in case in an appeal they overrule your jurisdiction issue,

the subject matter jurisdiction of the previous court?

So if there was no jurisdiction, and actually what I'm trying to get people to do on subject matter jurisdiction is to go after the judge immediately.

Actually, Randy, it's the prosecution's. Whoever is asserting the jurisdiction has to prove the jurisdiction.

It's the judge that asserts the jurisdiction. The prosecutor makes the claim, and the judge has to look at the claim and see if it invokes the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

That's why the judge has to make sure that he has subject matter jurisdiction before he exercises any authority, because if he doesn't, he has no immunity of any kind.

We go before the court. I just made up a demand that my plea to the jurisdiction be heard before anything else is heard.

It's not, the burden of proof still lies on, well, jurisdiction lies on him.

It's Luce v. American Energy Savers, Inc., in 1988, where jurisdiction is contested. The burden of establishing it rests upon the plaintiff.

Until the plaintiff submits uncontroversial evidence of subject matter jurisdiction to the court, that the court has subject matter jurisdiction, the court is proceeding without subject matter jurisdiction.

Right, but the pleadings of the prosecution must state why the court has the jurisdiction is what I'm getting out of this case.

And that's why I'm saying the assertion of jurisdiction has to come from the plaintiff, not from the court.

Show me that I have jurisdiction to sit in this case where the case doesn't begin.

Okay. So what we do is we make up a lawsuit against the judge claiming that he acted without subject matter jurisdiction and therefore is subject to civil suit and we sue him personally.

When a judge acts without subject matter jurisdiction or when he makes a decision that's not judicial and what that goes to is an administrative decision or a decision that violates a ministerial duty.

And that's why we set up subject matter jurisdiction as a way to defeat summary judgment.

You make the claim that he has no subject matter jurisdiction based on the fact that he has no immunity based on the fact that he has no subject matter jurisdiction.

Let's consider the judge has not shown the jurisdiction required.

They can't proceed in the pre-existing case because there's no jurisdiction to begin with.

If you're going after monetary damages, it would be very difficult to collect because there wouldn't be jurisdiction at that level for any type of monetary damages.

he has to prove up subject matter jurisdiction because he's the one that started the fight.

None of it gets me to maritime jurisdiction on the land.

is satisfied to keep the vessel from leaving the jurisdiction and putting itself in a position

Well I heard the yellow fringe flag is jurisdiction of admiralty or military occupation flag.

the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

And anyway, before I can even look at Admiralty, I have to get Admiralty jurisdiction and I

And I got the jurisdiction and he's interested in starting a meetup group for the jurisdictionary

of city ordinances, you have to give that judge jurisdiction to hear it.

And the only person that can give them jurisdiction is you because you do have a right to a jury trial.

It's because they're equating maritime jurisdiction with the vessel, and it's not the vessel.

The maritime jurisdiction goes to the navigable waters, not the vessel.

can somehow change jurisdiction and wiggle out from under the bindings of the lien?

that he had no subject matter jurisdiction to issue the summons. And I filed a criminal

the court was about subject matter jurisdiction to issue the summons. But on his face, it

the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

because if he attempts to exert any jurisdiction and the petitioner has not established sufficient

Subject matter jurisdiction can never be waived.

What you need to do is brief out subject matter jurisdiction in this case.

and the court must take judicial notice of the lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter

If you've challenged jurisdiction and the court hasn't proven jurisdiction, sue the

And another one I really liked was a Nexus Between Territorial Jurisdiction and Cause

Basically quasi-jurisdiction of the association

Because he admitted that he didn't have jurisdiction for governing our offenses

Because if they don't show authority, they don't have standing. If they don't have standing, they're unable to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court

Then he's without subject matter jurisdiction and you can sue him

And if he does not, he is unable to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

but they have never proved jurisdiction over me,

and I have inserted that fact from the beginning that they may have jurisdiction over the billing.

But they've never inserted any kind of jurisdiction or proved jurisdiction on me or my wife personally,

then they don't have to prove jurisdiction over you, just over the building.

Well, I believe that the Admiralty jurisdiction is contract with the King, which would be possibly England.

The thing is, the difference is you're talking Admiralty jurisdiction versus Maritime law.

Admiralty jurisdiction is the jurisdiction for Maritime law.

Jurisdiction is within the boundaries of whatever state or the United States,

doesn't have a boundary that somehow maritime jurisdiction comes in off the sea.

It's an over-the-seas jurisdiction that...

But that is where the jurisdiction must be brought into play when the pleading is filed.

If it does not exist in the pleading, then it's not invoking that jurisdiction for that pleading.

To invoke the jurisdiction of the court under their admiralty, yes.

Randy's saying the case law says the water is what invokes the jurisdiction of maritime,

Okay, let's go to an admulty jurisdiction case.

It must be taken to be settled law of this court that while the civil jurisdiction of

the contract, and that the English rule which concedes jurisdiction with few exceptions

for the purpose of admiralty jurisdiction and applicable of the Jones Act.

do this you didn't have jurisdiction and then you say to them well how do you

have jurisdiction you don't have any document to prove that you had your

be challenged later on down the road is the jurisdiction because subject matter

jurisdiction can always be challenged later on down the line and these people

are claiming to do things under Admiralty jurisdiction and just because it

have to be wherever the jurisdiction exists and the jurisdiction can exist

it can have multiple locations of jurisdiction depending upon what you're

state didn't give all the jurisdiction away to the federal government or

have multiple places that would have jurisdiction which would remove it to the

necessarily but I have a comment on the jurisdiction in amnesty is the plaintiff

that brings the jurisdiction that's what the counterclaim reverses it makes you

jurisdiction and also within the court subject matter restriction on other

only an admiralty or maritime jurisdiction is an admiralty or

within the subject matter jurisdiction of admiralty that was what I was looking

jurisdiction because you want to you have to be able to show that it falls

under the jurisdiction and I can't get there for the most part I'm not a seaman

but the libel has to be associated somehow with maritime jurisdiction well

falls within the jurors right that's not defined the jurisdiction that's

you can't just say it's maritime jurisdiction because I'm implying rule

H and rule H implies maritime jurisdiction that's that's circular

we're an Admiralty jurisdiction because we're invoking rule 9h when rule 9h is

the case if the law has subject matter jurisdiction I'm granting it you can't

we can't maritime jurisdiction is very specifically defined and we can't exceed

has to be in there is jurisdiction you have to show the court why it's able to

exercise whatever jurisdiction you're claiming okay can't just claim it

jurisdiction be charging the court to exercise that jurisdiction so you have

jurisdiction precisely because we're not because we're not the judge right and

the jurisdiction is very clearly defined in order for us to keep control of that

judge you must act within a certain jurisdiction in certain circumstances

and first thing we have to tell him is what jurisdiction he's authorized to act

we just choose our jurisdiction no we can't all we can do is apply the

jurisdiction that's already been established all right I will only get to

not establish jurisdiction correct what does political status mean being a

liens to establish jurisdiction on contracts are written before there was

trying to reassociate jurisdiction with contracts that have been established

than conflict of laws which addresses questions of which legal jurisdiction a

case can be heard in and the law concerning that jurisdiction right this

it's a form that other jurisdiction yes yes yes and they they have some kind of

have a legitimate claim to that jurisdiction or whatever but the point

invoke this Admiralty jurisdiction unless you're really dealing with

outside of his jurisdiction absolutely brings us up man-to-man even up where I

adjudicated till the judge no longer has subject matter jurisdiction over you

jurisdiction is because there is more ways and more authority to go after the

about how that there are certain rules under the maritime jurisdiction at which

from agenda 21 talked has said that in animal see jurisdiction the the judges

jurisdiction you have no rights okay when you when you go on a ship all right

rights that's admiralty jurisdiction it's maritime law but it's admiralty

jurisdiction well isn't that what these guys are talking about no no no wait

admiralty law but it's the same thing a jurisdiction under mayor over maritime

difference between the jurisdiction of one and the other if they're now merged

aspect that you know from my perspective you've got in rim jurisdiction which is

over property you got personal jurisdiction which is over the person

you've got subject matter jurisdiction which is over the subject and it sounds

like Merit or not maritime but admiralty jurisdiction if that's that's

what it is is over water well no admiralty jurisdiction is it's like

jurisdiction is basically over something you know whether it's property person or

admiralty is the jurisdiction and which is jurisdiction in admiralty only goes

choose a law that has subject matter jurisdiction or jurisdiction over the

I'm getting at is I'm picking the choice of law under the same jurisdiction as I

federal jurisdiction and and you have to apply it in the federal realm of yeah

was saying a minute ago about the Admiralty jurisdiction and maritime law

jurisdiction because because Bill is saying that under a certain

jurisdiction you can invoke different areas of law that's what I'm that's what

be under Admiralty jurisdiction you just gave me a headache I'm following along

and I use the choice of law within the jurisdiction that I'm applying it to

the maritime law and or Admiralty jurisdiction because of the way that the

point that they are within the maritime jurisdiction because they're placing

it if they if you assert a jurisdiction the jurisdiction goes unchallenged

jurisdiction and nobody objects to it then if I don't have it but if nobody

applying in a case within underneath a certain jurisdiction and and what I'm

invoke Admiralty jurisdiction and we have Bill back on the line okay you can

choose a certain area of law within a particular jurisdiction right

standard federal jurisdiction what what types of law can be used under federal

jurisdiction anyway what well by statutory law would be the USC that's

Admiralty jurisdiction with maritime law and calling them the same thing and

saying maritime jurisdiction and Admiralty law and we have to be very

Admiralty jurisdiction can only be invoked in very special cases but I'm

you're talking about a jurisdiction called Admiralty jurisdiction and you're

jurisdiction or not it's a legitimate question I think their premise is is

issue of invoking Admiralty jurisdiction that part of the case has already been

jurisdiction Kate where's the proof the proof is in the court documents the

already agreed that to add work to Tim invoking Admiralty jurisdiction it's

trying to invoke the Admiralty jurisdiction I mean until I can see some

jurisdiction subject matter jurisdiction can always be challenged at any point

record them in their realm or in their jurisdiction or I don't know how to

because then they have just left the statutory jurisdiction and entered your jurisdiction.

stay while she's there and federal jurisdiction is lame so I mean it works it does work.

Article 3 well that's the common law jurisdiction actually Article 3 court when you declare

common law jurisdiction you're taking yourself into Article 3 jurisdiction.

things from your previous callers. Kimberly, subject matter jurisdiction can be raised

Well, wouldn't basically the jurisdiction be the first thing to be challenged?

And I was wondering if, you know, subject matter jurisdiction is an issue, Randy.

Then file a challenge to the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

the jurisdiction because of the issues I just told you about.

It includes non-waiver of any rights, a demand the jurisdiction be considered first, and

But a lot of people use it to show a different jurisdiction in court is the theory behind it.

jurisdiction that is also within the jurisdiction of the district court on some other ground

but it is well known that Admiralty jurisdiction is twofold a prized jurisdiction exercised

in a civil jurisdiction over causes civil and maritime springing from a consideration

jurisdiction and also within the court subject matter jurisdiction on some other ground the

the jurisdiction well it has to be a court that can hear maritime and it has to apply

jurisdiction so maritime law says you can grab that ship you can arrest the ship and

your lien stands before anyone else's because if he leaves your jurisdiction you're unable

And do you think, you said something about jurisdiction last night, do you think I should appeal the case or?

grants jurisdiction to the court.

familiar with the entire process. But I'm not sure where the jurisdiction would be.

who volunteered. That could be interesting. I thought so. And the jurisdiction and the

That's where you go not to the merits, but to the subject matter jurisdiction details.

What I don't understand is how come people seem to be having success with this admiralty or maritime jurisdiction or whatever they're saying it is or doing it.

to the jurisdiction of the court?

Because it says something about the jurisdiction in the notice.

Okay, what it says about the jurisdiction in the notice,

and demand that any challenge to the subject matter of jurisdiction be heard first.

Didn't they fool him into thinking he didn't have jurisdiction or some crap like that?

So why don't you explain to us why Judge Hand actually does have jurisdiction to hear your examining trial

And I did want to explain about the jurisdiction of Judge Hand and everything so that we would understand…

because he did have jurisdiction to hear that examining trial.

It says, the term special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States as used

maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular

Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, U.S. 18 U.S.C. 7.

The term special maritime, territorial jurisdiction of the United States is used in this title

of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular state and any vessel belonging

of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular state.

maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular

So it has to be, the only way it gets outside the jurisdiction of any state is if it is

I think I'm going to challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of the court because I

Therefore, that goes to a challenge of jurisdiction of a municipal court to hear any type of traffic

So civil jurisdiction is the only thing left that they've got, which would make sense considering

jurisdiction by a municipal court because in Texas, municipal courts have zero civil

and he did put in a motion and charged with jurisdiction as well as a couple other things.

the federal courthouse did not see it correctly. Kentucky state law or the jurisdiction belonged

Why do you think he wants admiralty jurisdiction in his court?

the jurisdiction and which did, in fact, put that judge out of business. But in a regular

the maritime jurisdiction has not even been challenged?

jurisdiction is as extensive upon land as upon water.

It may be in the power of Congress to confer Admiralty jurisdiction upon its courts over

Even if he claims to be in maritime, if the maritime jurisdiction has not been specifically

And unless the jurisdiction has been specifically planned, then he's bound by the oath.

over the people who are being drug into that jurisdiction against our will.

Okay, that's what I was about to go to, is diversity jurisdiction Did you go to California and do something?

This is diversity jurisdiction Is the matter in controversy in excess of $70,000?

Yeah, and if they intend to adjudicate the case that you will first remove it to the county, to the jurisdiction where you live, that's the first thing in a nuns pro tonk

And then let them respond to that. First, I would do an unsproutonk to move it to a jurisdiction convenient to you.

was filed with the court in Texas, then you may be able to bring the jurisdiction back

Even they don't have any jurisdiction over her at all.

This county is going to act like they have jurisdiction over her, and they're going to

If the ticket was filed but no information was filed and he's in a county with a criminal district court, the court had no jurisdiction to begin with.

Denton County has no subject matter jurisdiction in the case,

The magistrate has subject matter jurisdiction over the complaint.

Report references to dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based upon these

That just has to do with the court of original jurisdiction of where the filing took place.

jurisdiction and attempt to engage this non-statutory and attempt to engage this non-statutory private

Code or subject to your jurisdiction under SANE.

If a public official assumes jurisdiction during his or her pursuits, insists on engaging

uh... subject matter jurisdiction to take on

district had no subject matter jurisdiction well i asked her that i

I did a search for jurisdiction and got a hit on a page on jurisdiction.

Subject matter jurisdiction, how did you get subject matter jurisdiction over me?

I had my Manila folder open up with my affidavit, availability to pay and all my paperwork, attacking jurisdiction of court.

The city of Jacksonville had no jurisdiction in the rust.

him in or taking custody of him in Rusk and taking him from that jurisdiction to a foreign

that had jurisdiction to a city that didn't was an act of aggravated kidnapping.

and then I go and listen to the jurisdiction and why this pro se guy probably got beaten in court because he never objected.

The jurisdiction area, I think he has 147 objections.

But they want to send up this jurisdiction role playing because they say they see too many pro se people making mental mistakes in the courtroom.

And if there is no assessment, the agents without subject matter jurisdiction and committing fraud,

and then claim they have no subject matter jurisdiction and dismiss it.

1028A1, lack of jurisdiction over subject matter of this action. Plaintiffs fail to

of rights of initios and does not grant court jurisdiction other than to dismiss plaintiff's

over the primary claim, yet have subject matter jurisdiction over the counterclaim. So if

He has subject matter jurisdiction over your claim. And if he rules that you take nothing,

thing that they have jurisdiction to do is dismiss it.

matter jurisdiction over your claim against them.

He has no jurisdiction over the other side's claim. He does have jurisdiction over your

he went to subject matter jurisdiction and found he didn't have it, he would have dismissed.

because the jurisdiction doesn't want to pay to transport you,

is challenge the officer's jurisdiction to enforce the statutes to begin with. Why? He's produced no

And the municipal court in Texas has zero civil jurisdiction. Their jurisdiction is limited to criminal only

I'm thinking, as much as I've given the maritime jurisdiction guys a hard time,

Therefore, the court acted without jurisdiction and must dismiss.

Board had exclusive jurisdiction over the controversy.

Yeah, subject matter jurisdiction first but what aspect of subject matter jurisdiction?

within the code that the county attorney is to have jurisdiction in the courts below the

An Article III court is the only court that has any criminal jurisdiction over the people.

The county or the city attorney, according to the code, has jurisdiction to prosecute

When we go into court, the rule 12 motion is not heard first, jurisdiction is heard

I want to have the subject matter jurisdiction of which there will be several different subject

matter jurisdiction challenges right off the bat and we'll get into those shortly.

So under subject matter jurisdiction first, application of the code second, and we have

We are accompanying our challenging jurisdiction of jurisdiction with our judicial notice.

They had no subject matter jurisdiction to start with.

They are using the term taxpayer to bring you into their jurisdiction as someone that owes the tax.

Because the small jurisdiction they may meet once a month the largest jurisdiction they meet all the time

subject to the jurisdiction of Congress.

It doesn't apply in a statutory jurisdiction any more than the U.S. Constitution would apply in a French court.

and questioning the jurisdiction that they're in, then they're going to have a little bit more success.

If it is possible to not be in statutory jurisdiction in the first place,

Is it a declaration within the jurisdiction of common law?

if you say not guilty, you've just acquiesced to the jurisdiction of the court.

Look at jurisdiction of court of entry, okay?

and I asked him about jurisdiction a little bit about, well, I stated, I said,

You know, either they have jurisdiction here or the police department has jurisdiction here

I do not live in a jurisdiction where the capitol is located.

aren't you still in a common law jurisdiction because of that?

So your attorney told you that a challenge to the jurisdiction would be redundant at trial?

Because the Rules of Civil Procedure 120A very clearly establishes that a challenge to the jurisdiction is heard before anything else.

He has different jurisdiction and authority as a magistrate than he does as a judge

He has jurisdiction to hear any complaint, felony or misdemeanor, state or federal, from anywhere in the state

When he's finished with that, then he's to forward all the documents to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction and he has no more authority

Yo bubba show me where you got subject matter jurisdiction to put your hand on me

Okay well I was just kind of curious about that distinction between the two and where one jurisdiction ends or begins and the other one starts

So have you found where he got subject matter jurisdiction on private property?

And I said, well, I'd like to know what jurisdiction the court has of this matter.

city lost subject matter jurisdiction because they didn't follow the standing law, that

under this type of privacy communication is that jurisdiction is in the county

I'm wondering if I can take this off for lack of jurisdiction with prejudice if they try

If she is not a person to whom the law applies, subject matter jurisdiction does not exist.

Subject matter jurisdiction should have been the first.

And also, I think, Chris, you uncovered or mentioned something about the fact that with the highway patrol, Hanger was out of his jurisdiction that day.

And it's reminiscent of the case in the Kennedy assassination of why Officer Tippett was where he was because he was way out of his jurisdiction and area also.

moves to challenge the jurisdiction of the court, claiming that since he violated a law relating to his office,

he's disqualified as a witness and is unable to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court,

jurisdiction and authority. And we didn't grant them authority over us, only over the things

that you could say this court does not have jurisdiction as there is no court reporter

If it's not there, he does not have standing to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court,

They all went to sufficiency of the paperwork to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

By any chance have you invested in jurisdiction area.

and forwarded it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction so that all of those documents get in the court record.

Well, it was basically challenging jurisdiction on a traffic case because it didn't provide the administrative hearing.

Where I wanted to go was the guy with the dog who called the police, when he's not in his jurisdiction and he's not acting in his official capacity,

charges against the police officer challenge to the jurisdiction because the police officer

uh citation and they're saying they give them jurisdiction they're doing any such thing

and so on and so forth what jurisdiction were you in yeah i was in the city of austin on going from

about uh you know subject matter jurisdiction and if i plea do i lose my chance to question the

subject matter jurisdiction okay you can never waive subject matter jurisdiction no matter what

you do period okay yeah subject matter jurisdiction can be addressed at any time even long after the

jurisdiction you can waive what you need to do now is when you go to the court you don't go to

issue about the jurisdiction of the municipal court and you can find that jurisdiction under

section 29.003 of the government code but if you will notice the jurisdiction is very very

jurisdiction granted to a municipal court okay that is section b where the municipal court has

concurrent jurisdiction with the justice court of a precinct in which the municipality is located

that area but when it comes to state law their jurisdiction is strictly criminal and it is

right municipal court had jurisdiction over defendant's criminal action even though an

proceedings for processing cases that come within the criminal jurisdiction of justice

two documents that grant jurisdiction to a court they are an indictment and they aren't information

that's all there is nothing in the constitution that says a complaint grants jurisdiction to a

jurisdiction now i do have case law that says a prosecution commences when a complaint is filed

with a magistrate or the person is arrested but neither one of those give jurisdiction to the

to give the grand jury jurisdiction to examine into anything now a federal grand jury can examine

accusation to be sufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court

It reminds me of Dr. Graves when he told that he wrote the jurisdiction area so an eighth

Okay, the jurisdiction was never ever settled in the court about them having jurisdiction

jurisdiction to the court?

away the state's jurisdiction over their welfare.

You really needed to, but a challenge to the jurisdiction will help.

over us, so they didn't have jurisdiction over a marriage certificate.

Then the judge, the court stands with jurisdiction over the children, unless you can find a way

to take that jurisdiction away from them.

The fact that that other entity claims to be associated with the foreign sovereign in the United States, that would not invoke federal jurisdiction unless you went after the third party.

They remove it to the fed and then claim they don't have jurisdiction to dismiss.

Well, what he's going to be talking about is the jurisdiction of the IRS.

and foreigners that are that are actually anybody that's under contract with the federal government in which would be consistent with jurisdiction as I understand it.

which I do the state government is the one that has jurisdiction and anybody that doubts that they can go down and ask their local fire department

and the jurisdiction of the state as far as emergency equipment stuff of that nature.

And if the federal government has exclusive jurisdiction the state enforcement and stuff cannot go on that property because of the sovereignty issue.

So if the 1040 form is taxable trusts how is it that you can come under the jurisdiction of that particular tax.

And the federal government could not tax even their own employees who are in the jurisdiction of the state.

that's not under the jurisdiction of the Federal Government so it's a moot point.

jurisdiction and Russia we don't care what medium of exchange they use over there.

The Federal Government does not have jurisdiction over you so they need to go home and leave

a subject matter jurisdiction at the head so seemingly because it would obdiate the contract

and it is fraud that subject matter jurisdiction can be something that would be attacked at

as a credible person and deny him subject matter jurisdiction to act in any official

and they also had to do that in order to give it to jurisdiction and tax court,

because tax court does not have jurisdiction to entertain employment tax issues

then you are squarely under the jurisdiction of the Internal Revenue Service.

the kind of international scope that could bring it jurisdiction over us

jurisdiction over interstate transmission, not in trust state. If my transmission doesn't

in their house. The FCC has jurisdiction over that they, according to what they claim is

the FCC claims that they have jurisdiction over the airwaves and that's how they get

have jurisdiction to regulate the airwaves anyway.

government that the federal government has jurisdiction over in his whole state.

and the state that the feds had no jurisdiction in his county and that's how he won a Supreme

Well the other thing he had in his benefit there as far as the jurisdiction goes, I mean,

does a lot of people out there not understand that federal jurisdiction does not exist within

been ceded, then their jurisdiction doesn't exist.

have jurisdiction in a certain area or not.

Well, the first point is that the proposed law is supposedly not within the jurisdiction of the city of New York.

Now, True was a district attorney, and I would argue the district attorney in New York City has jurisdiction to investigate this,

New York has jurisdiction over murder, not the feds, unless the president happened to have been in that building,

well, even if the feds do have jurisdiction in this matter, there's nothing that prohibits local jurisdiction as well.

Right. It's not exclusive jurisdiction in the federal authority. That was my argument.

There's nothing in the home rule law that says I have to have jurisdiction in that sense.

Since you're not initiating any kind of a legal action against anyone, is jurisdiction even a relevant issue?

There's another issue about the jurisdiction as well.

If they're not public officials, then jurisdiction doesn't apply in any case anyway.

You're going to have to decide that jurisdiction issue outside of the petition.

it doesn't take away the jurisdiction of the city of New York in the first place.

within the jurisdiction of the city of New York.

in New York City has jurisdiction to investigate this, but he hasn't.

New York has jurisdiction over murder, not the feds, unless the president

were also talking about, well, even if the feds do have jurisdiction in this

matter, there's nothing that prohibits local jurisdiction as well.

Right, it's not exclusive jurisdiction in the federal authority.

have jurisdiction because the murders were committed in New York City?

is jurisdiction even a relevant issue?

There's another issue about the jurisdiction as well.

If they're not public officials, then jurisdiction doesn't apply in any case anyway.

Now there are certain provisions where the severability clause won't work. It won't work on jurisdiction. You're going to have to decide that jurisdiction issue outside of the petition. So it's not for that.

If the courts ruled that New York City doesn't have the jurisdiction to investigate crimes in New York City.

Well, even if it gives them diversity and jurisdiction, it doesn't take away the jurisdiction of the city of New York in the first place.

I have not sat down and written out an outline for it but I can tell you it parallels jurisdiction very closely

He could always challenge such a matter of jurisdiction in any case

I know of no jurisdiction where the judge has authority to delegate judicial powers to a clerk

Oh yes, if the judge acts without subject matter jurisdiction or you can make a valid sounding claim that he acted without subject matter jurisdiction

Okay, standing goes to subject matter jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged when?

If it's not verified, it does not, it's insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court

Subject matter jurisdiction may be challenged no matter how remote in history

No, subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged no matter how remote in history

For your purposes, you file a challenge to the subject matter jurisdiction of the court first

They don't have to be, challenge to the jurisdiction can be filed all by itself

and ensure that they were sufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court

And that would give the magistrate subject matter jurisdiction for the purpose of holding an examining trial

So the affidavit is sufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court

But only to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction is not valid for anything else

I was listening to the jurisdiction area the other day, I went to the jurisdiction area meeting in Austin here

But his testimony, while it would be sufficient to invoke the subject matter of jurisdiction of the magistrate, he can't testify to what I told him

The affidavit can give the court jurisdiction to begin the litigation process

Challenge to the subject matter jurisdiction the importance to the judge themselves.

By the way, I forgot to mention, in the state in question and in the jurisdiction in question, the defendant is presumed to be competent.

If I subpoena the accuser, my concern would be that I might be acquiescing to the jurisdiction of the court,

If you challenge subject matter jurisdiction or if you're considering subject matter jurisdiction, you can never give a court subject matter jurisdiction.

Now, in personum jurisdiction, jurisdiction over you personally, you can grant.

Jurisdiction would be acquired, I suppose, and then you'd have the bonding instrument.

In Gerstein Pew, it explains that the warrant is the document that gives the state subject matter jurisdiction and authority to continue to hold you,

The jurisdiction stops when the person gets before the magistrate.

about the challenge to personal jurisdiction for lack of administrative hearing.

We're charging $200 without jurisdiction for people who are actually coming to the seminar in person.

Judge, who are you? How did you get subject matter jurisdiction to stand before me and order me around?

So when I go before the judge, I'm going to ask the judge specifically how that judge got subject matter jurisdiction in the case.

That gives the magistrate jurisdiction for the purpose of making a determination of probable cause.

which is a federal case, that he must issue a warrant in order to give jurisdiction to the court.

Anyway, okay, that's how you get to subject matter jurisdiction of the court,

federal government doesn't have any jurisdiction anyway except on specific

They're asking this judge, where did you get subject matter jurisdiction to

The state court would have jurisdiction to hear this in the instant case under

jurisdiction because of two things.

Well, now, in all fairness, the federal court would also have jurisdiction on

federal court has jurisdiction under the federal constitutional arguments that

candidate, the question of jurisdiction simply does not arise.

And if they get subject matter jurisdiction on one act of a criminal conspiracy, they get jurisdiction on all of it.

Well, how it affects them, they still have jurisdiction to hold court,

but the state itself has criminal jurisdiction over the property.

that the court doesn't have jurisdiction to hold court.

They didn't want to address the fact because they don't have jurisdiction with what was going on.

irregardless of Hays having jurisdiction in this case for the case itself,

And I have a different way of addressing subject matter jurisdiction than most attorneys do.

is insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

So how do you challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of the court?

If these guys don't have jurisdiction to do what they're doing,

Jurisdiction in personum and subject matter jurisdiction, primarily.

If they have jurisdiction over you, they do.

You can give them in personam jurisdiction by waiving it, but you cannot give them subject matter jurisdiction.

So the place specified in the notice to appear must be before magistrate having jurisdiction of the offense who is in the municipality

Bullet point number seven, after appearing as promised and no magistrate having subject matter jurisdiction being present

And even the Supreme Court has failed to take into account the Texas Constitution, which specifically states that there are only two documents that grant jurisdiction to a court, and they are an indictment or an information.

The complaint does not grant jurisdiction to the court for any purpose other than issuing a warrant.

You will maintain that the complaint is insufficient to invoke subject matter jurisdiction in the court.

The Constitution and the statutes say that an indictment or an information bestowed jurisdiction on the court.

And that can invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the magistrate.

What it does do is deprive you of subject matter jurisdiction to decide whether or not I committed this act.

The federal government has no jurisdiction within the borders of the states except on territories and lands ceded to the federal government.

that they don't have the jurisdiction and he's going to have to dismiss it.

because the petition is insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court.

Article 1517, subsection B makes it very specific that the municipal or JP court loses jurisdiction the moment you're brought into the court on the warrant

Which means they lost jurisdiction when they issued the warrant

Once again, lack of subject matter jurisdiction rears its ugly head for them, okay?

The advice that you guys have given me, okay, I actually felt guilty of them, the amount of money I've spent for the jurisdiction there

Yeah, plus we've got the added bonus here in Texas in that the administrative code spells out the fact that they don't have jurisdiction 90% of the time anyway

Yes, I challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of this court because the information contained in this affidavit

I challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of, I'm sorry, I didn't get quite all of that.

If the law doesn't apply to you, there is no subject matter jurisdiction associated with it.

And then we argue whether they have such a diversity jurisdiction or not.

I took the evaluation last week, went in today to answer for the evaluation for the hearing, and they challenged the jurisdiction again.

pointing out that they're violating your rights and that kind of jurisdiction and stuff.

just doing this without any regard whatsoever for jurisdiction or due process or evidence

You claim that guy didn't have any jurisdiction and because he didn't have any jurisdiction

So Frederick, you sold a lot of jurisdiction areas, is a big hit.

Well the court really doesn't have plenary jurisdiction over you and he may be able to,

of jurisdiction in adjacent county, but it's

have jurisdiction to pull you over, but you're on Lamar

subject matter jurisdiction or had no

down as unconstitutional. But in the meantime, the jurisdiction makes a lot of money. So

ask for injunctive relief, ordering the jurisdiction to repay all of these monies in triplicate,

I'm saying okay, so the state is outside of the jurisdiction of the state and federal constitutions

But it doesn't, it's not in a federal statute, it's in a state statute, so this goes to state activity, doesn't go to diversity jurisdiction that would be dealt with by the feds

If he doesn't have standing, then he is unable to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court

And the petitioner doesn't have standing, then the judge does not have subject matter jurisdiction and he is impersonating a public official

Claimed he didn't have subject matter jurisdiction but this particular petition had not been notarized

Put the challenge subject matter jurisdiction in immediately

And that's the subject matter jurisdiction will ask for that

This won't be a surprise to the court that they get a challenge to jurisdiction to show agency

I am not under the jurisdiction of the law they're using to get the blood sample.

And then I take out the heading off the lawsuit, the parties, the venue, the jurisdiction and

why the judge has jurisdiction and why the court has venue.

matter jurisdiction, because it became a diversity jurisdiction issue.

And it's kind of nice with the challenge to the jurisdiction and the motions to disqualify, he's automatically disqualified, he can't rule on a motion to disqualify himself

and have complete and total jurisdiction over every square inch of land inside the state

And so the notion that the federal government would have any kind of jurisdiction over waterways at all

That is private land. The federal boys and the state have absolutely no jurisdiction on that land

If you're going to come to a court and attempt to invoke subject matter jurisdiction with that court,

then their pleadings are insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

It's my position that it is not my place to determine whether or not the judge has subject matter jurisdiction over a cause when he exercises authority over me.

and let him prove up his subject matter jurisdiction to a grand jury where he should be proving it up instead of coming into court and say it just doesn't matter.

However, if the original pleading is insufficient to invoke subject matter jurisdiction in the court, he's not a judge.

Well, I hadn't read the jurisdiction area yet, but I'm –

through that jurisdiction area because here in Travis County, it's highly likely

Yeah, you have freehold of your property, you have total jurisdiction of your own property.

There is no jurisdiction on your property.

that has jurisdiction on this piece of property besides my wife and I.

Therefore, the petition is insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

No, I want to go to the district attorney and say the judge doesn't have any subject matter jurisdiction in this case, and I want you to arrest him.

It kind of goes to what you guys were just talking about, a judge not understanding that they have to try to determine jurisdiction in some respect.

The feds don't have any jurisdiction anyway, unless the state government has ceded specific property to the federal government, or unless there's some terms of agreement in the annexation like with California, but that ain't the way it is in Texas.

Nope. And I can say right now because I've been to the state archives library and pulled all the files, there is not one square inch of land in Travis County that is under the jurisdiction of the federal government, period.

for the court to gain jurisdiction to hold a pretrial.

Okay. And then one more question. When I filed the challenge to jurisdiction in this court, I gave it to the judge,

So you allege no subject matter jurisdiction, no immunity. He has to hire his own attorney to prove that he does have subject matter jurisdiction or immunity.

was that the court was without subject matter jurisdiction because there was no complaint

having jurisdiction provided that the county's having no county attorney misdemeanor, having

It takes a criminal accusation to give the grand jury subject matter jurisdiction in

We need to put back the original jurisdiction of government to get that back in place.

original jurisdiction of government is back in place.

jurisdiction to proceed.

One is to the jurisdiction of the prosecuting

jurisdiction to initiate the

jurisdiction if you start arguing the merits.

jurisdiction over me. And they couldn't

it's Federal, it must show jurisdiction on the face of the pleading, such as I'll say

so this court's got jurisdiction pursuant to, say, 28 U.S.C., 1331, which is general

And I, anyone listening to this program, please challenge the jurisdiction in standing.

They cannot do it because subject matter jurisdiction is something that when you challenge it, they

We have to go on for jurisdiction for them to even put a cease and desist order on them,

Show me that you have jurisdiction to even talk to me or go away.

Absent a valid oath of office, he is absolute subject matter jurisdiction and authority,

Federal courts have no jurisdiction over state issues, period.

anything in the air anywhere, they have jurisdiction over you. They can

jurisdiction over radio transmissions that are intrastate only if they

of their code that they only have jurisdiction over interstate commercial

statute specifically says they have jurisdiction only over interstate

You have subject matter jurisdiction not over the federal issues,

but since you drug it up into the federal court, you have subject matter jurisdiction over the state issues.

whether it be a change venue to federal jurisdiction or hire an attorney for the agent or anything,

And clearly there is because the city has no jurisdiction to start with.

And one thing about federal jurisdiction coming after you, as Deborah's talking about, the law of standing.

And as we know, subject matter jurisdiction can be brought up at any time in court, out of court, if you're in the can.

Yeah, but they have no jurisdiction because it's local. It doesn't go over state lines. Just take command access.

They don't want it traveling a distance because they want to stifle communication, and that is totally against their charter, and they don't have jurisdiction anyway inside the state.

jurisdiction over the case.

There's still an issue that it doesn't look to me like these guys even have jurisdiction at all.

Yeah, and worst-case scenario, you know, we get the jurisdiction challenge shot down in court,

and then litigate on it lack of subject matter jurisdiction counter complain against the

you challenge subject matter jurisdiction what I've been telling people is you don't

the first thing you do is not file a challenge to the jurisdiction you counter complain against

the judge accusing him of acting without subject matter jurisdiction and impersonating a public

the one that has to determine jurisdiction and the guy said of course you do and that's

the point the judge before he exercises jurisdiction he better know he has it because that's the

courts the jurisdiction over it but the problem they have is that if you can claim the lower

court has no jurisdiction because of the Administrative Procedures Act and the department that regulates

and more what i was getting at remember i asked about um federal jurisdiction and whether a judge

can a state judge can say it's not under federal jurisdiction or it is under federal jurisdiction

isn't under my jurisdiction essentially what i'm asking is can a grand jury say yes we believe

jurisdiction and then dismiss but but if you have a grand jury handed down and say yes we believe

the state had jurisdiction she got indicted by the state and she ended up going to state penitentiary

prosecute the federal agents and the fed said no way and they took up the jurisdiction in federal

jurisdiction and what we need to do then is go after the federal judge in the state

if he didn't have subject matter jurisdiction it was his duty to determine that before he

subject matter jurisdiction he opens the door for us to come after him yeah see that's what

judge's fault or or anything if the feds grab up jurisdiction or like what happened today

before he does anything in a case whether or not he has subject matter jurisdiction that was the

he said well it's not my place to determine subject matter jurisdiction of course it's your place

to make sure that he wasn't overstepping the bounds of his jurisdiction and and the judge

whether it's his jurisdiction or not and if there's sort of two things one he should be

that yes a state law has been violated and therefore it is under the jurisdiction of the

state jurisdiction then he can do so and a jury can then determine it yeah i agree i agree okay

or state jurisdiction well see wait a minute hold on i i think i see i think i see where mitchell

him human was acting not in the capacity in order to uh maintain the jurisdiction of the state

to try to grab up the jurisdiction especially if if uh the alleged activity occurred while they

about the irs before and have some of them are acting out of their jurisdiction well this same

the federal just jurisdiction who cares you still have the power of discovery and subpoena so you

First off, we're challenging jurisdiction on many levels

In the event that the courts turn a blind eye to the blatant lack of jurisdiction that these guys have

In the ticket process I have a suit against the jurisdiction that's for injunctive relief

Especially when the FCC has no jurisdiction in regulating these interstate transmitters

and basically filed a challenge to jurisdiction with the order to ask the court to send me a copy.

So that means that the document's insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

You filed a challenge to the jurisdiction in your case.

Therefore, it didn't meet the rules, so it wasn't sufficient to invoke subject matter jurisdiction in the court.

But even if he did have jurisdiction, when you challenged jurisdiction and he didn't prove up jurisdiction, he lost jurisdiction.

Jurisdiction may not be proved, it may not be presumed, it must be proven.

The judge is acting upon a jurisdiction he does not have.

Well, this is a challenge to jurisdiction with a pretrial motion.

You're saying he never had jurisdiction to start with for a number of reasons

That must be done before the court has jurisdiction to accept the plea.

The challenge to jurisdiction is where would you read that,

but the sheriff has jurisdiction on all the property in the county.

The way they get jurisdiction on the state territory is just nonsense.

Therefore, we have jurisdiction to take complete control of all radio transmissions within the entire state.

especially with the federal jurisdiction aspect.

Federal jurisdiction is questionable in this case.

Oh, boy, I just finished listening to a jurisdiction show with Frederick Graves,

Your jurisdiction is in the state.

that they do not have jurisdiction in the counties of this state.

If I'm going to fight this issue, number one, I want jurisdiction challenged and it has