Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

you are presumed in that conversion stating that the conduct of that automobile is going

what happens in a fraudulent conversion of your funds to the bank's use

That's an unlawful conversion of funds in any state.

That is conversion in any state.

It's the very definition of conversion.

What has occurred is an outright criminal conversion of ownership of private property.

That is conversion when the employer takes that money and turns it over to the federal government.

Conversion is a tort, but theft is not.

Well, the conversion here in Texas comes under fraud, Randy. It's under the fraud statute.

Conversion is what you call the cause of action. Theft is what you would call this is theft.

Conversion is tort law. That comes under tort law, not criminal law. Criminal law is a statute that would be embezzlement or could be construed as embezzlement.

They may have a conversion statute in Texas. It depends on the state how they write it, but you can have a tort claim and a criminal claim both in the same jurisdiction.

And if any more money is withheld, then I will sue the company for criminal conversion.

Conversion would be the proper thing.

You won't. That's what I'm saying. Here in Texas, conversion is under the fraud statute.

Good, great. Then we could use conversion.

Yeah, that exactly goes to conversion.

Theft is not with, or conversion is not within the scope of the authority of the agent.

I also believe that if we start a barrage of attacks in the state courts for conversion against the employers

when they went to do that conversion to a civil judgment.

Fraud, fraud by down disclosure, conversion, false imprisonment

We also have a cause of action for conversion

That's where the conversion

But that's where the conversion comes in

We have a cause of action for criminal conversion, but Texas has rolled that into fraud

The other one is going to be conversion.

The conversion comes in when your funds are taken for public use unlawfully or for any other use without your consent

That's where conversion comes in.

These are the elements of conversion.

He didn't do it on defamation. He did it on conversion of private property or personal

right to know what a paper terrorist is so that I don't have to. Well, how did that go to conversion?

If I remember, conversion is very specific. Yeah, that's what I'm trying to figure out

too myself, and how I'm going to argue it. Reconversion, you have to, if I remember right,

Don't quote me with it. The conversion was very specific, and when I looked at it,

didn't answer, of course. But here's the definition, or the elements of conversion.

Two, conversion thereof by the defendant, and three, resulting damages.

The problem with that one is the nation of conversion had the conversion in?

So just him calling you a paper terrorist wouldn't go to conversion here?

conversion I don't see how someone calling you a name can go to conversion

Then by some miraculous judicial or statutory conversion process

So, and this is one of the things I was looking at here, and I'm here in California now, and this is one of the issues I was looking at, is if these guys are filing false documents and trying to take someone's property based on these false documents, isn't that called conversion?

Well, it's not only called conversion, but it's aggravated perjury also for swearing to facts that are untrue and knowingly untrue.

conversion of MOPAC partially anyway into a tollway which I would view as a theft of

you charge him with fraud and attempted conversion and demand that he show agency.

Yeah, that's called conversion.

Yeah, that sounds like conversion.

Conversion is private property.

against the borrower by illegally committing illegal conversion of the borrower's personal

they didn't even mention the property value, invasion of privacy and conversion violations. Well, there's no conversion. There's not any conversion. That's a whole different animal.

That's fraud. It's conversion. It's unconstitutional on its face.

It's conversion

All of the documents are currently undergoing revision and conversion to a standardized set.

Yeah, actually, I'm told that's actually one of the counts in the complaint is conversion.

Yeah, in Texas they did away with conversion.

So you have to actually make fraud the cause of action, not conversion.

has more recently, it was a claim of civil conversion, that is more recently in Texas

Now, in every law book I've ever read, when something is stolen or taken for public use without just compensation, that constitutes conversion.

And in Texas, that conversion has actually been taken into the encompassing umbrella of fraud.

They're going after all the server stores, and their offshore havens for conversion,

And then they were secreting out their conversions international with their network,

Right, they did it not once but twice, so they said they tried to sue the guy for conversion,

they said he can't sue for conversion, he can't move for conversion, it doesn't matter

Oh, so the only one who could sue for conversion would have been the title company who sent

And we have the technology now to make this kind of conversion without some artificial intermediary like a fiat currency or even a gold coin.

But one of the last computer consulting contracts I had before I opened my business back in Nackadoches was actually rewriting the federal budget software used by the Congress for Y2K conversions.

rights, or what do you think of like a conversion from lawful detainer?

Well, it would depend because conversion in most states have been rolled into the fraud

and you'd have to find out how it would constitute fraud before you could go after them for conversion.

Okay, other than like a conversion or an unlawful detainer or a constitutional right,

But if I was you and I was looking at something that would work no matter what, one, I want a piston conversion.

The fraudulent conversion, illegal conversion, aggravated perjury, felony tampering with the government document, and executing a document by deception.

Yeah, yeah, my other question was, this goes to the tomorrow state and federal court post foreclosure against Bank of America under FCRF, DCPA, TCPA, and lawful foreclosure and conversion.

conversion of property belonging to the borrower.

I have an amended pending adding longfall foreclosure and conversion,

Yeah, yeah, with the longfall foreclosure and conversion added in and additional defendants.

A person may bring suit for trespass or injury to the estate or the property of another, conversion of personal property, taking or detaining personal property of another, personal injury, forcible entry and detainer and forcible detainer, not later than two years after the day the cause of action accrues.

of the county it would be for fraud malfeasance of office streets of fiduciary duty conversion

heirs. You've got conversion, just about everything, self-dealing, you've got a loan

conversion of personal property taking or detaining the personal property of another

Conversion of personal property,

of action for illegal conversion and made it a criminal claim. Now to replace conversion

Commerce Code. That gives you a cause of action to sue under illegal conversion on the property.

But I was going to file charges for criminal conversion of, we were going to go with theft, fraud, money laundering, and mail fraud

Then sue them for fraud and conversion

Have you looked at suing for fraud and conversion?

imprisonment in Texas is a cause of action. It's like conversion. Conversion used to be

statute that establishes a cause of action for conversion. So you might look at your

It's technically not fraud. It would go closer to conversion.

Ask the district attorney to present the justice of the peace to the grand jury and indict him for illegal conversion of my real property.

This is illegal conversion.

That is a huge issue to judge his race for himself. That's official oppression. That's illegal conversion.

Except conversion is not the crime. The crime, Steve, do you remember the statutes in the government code?

Conversion used to be a crime. Now conversion is a cause of action.

And that by causing you to have to pay more money, that constitutes conversion of your real property,

and sue him for attempted conversion of my property

Then you need to file criminally against them for illegal conversion.

fees, legal fees, and any punitive damages for the fraudulent conversion of your property.

conversion.

And they turned conversion into a crime and now we have a fraudulent, Chapter

We have criminal conversion in Indiana.

Okay, if you have conversion, then you accuse them of conversion.

Then sue them for misallocation of funds for fraud and for conversion.

But now be aware that depending upon the state, like here in Texas, you can't sue them for conversion anymore.

You can only sue them for fraud because conversion was deemed to be a method of fraud.

But yeah, they can't, unless there's been some recent change that would allow them to do that to a taxpayer, which they first have to prove you are, then that's a complete conversion of private funds for public use.

You sue the trustee who sold the property for illegal conversion

You file a claim of fraud. In Texas, we have a special statute for illegal conversion of property.

of another, conversion of personal property, taking or detaining the personal property

3202 theft conversion used to be a a crime specifically relating to converting real property

theft of real property by conversion felony.

They said that they were going to commit the act of conversion and do a takings.

Okay, acts of conversion. Conversion as it relates to real property or to property is criminal.

They were going to commit the act of conversion in quotation and do a takings.

Oh, conversion

Conversion, illegal conversion or theft

Every state has a every state has a conversion statute where criminal offenses cause

Look for a look for something in conversion from generally criminal to civil.

It used to be called conversion in Texas and they moved the conversion statute into the theft statute.

No, what it'd go to is conversion.

Conversion. Get me there.

do for conversion. Conversion was the term for converting someone's real property to

Well it was set up as reverse mortgage and on this it says this is a home equity conversion mortgage loan

Okay I have no idea what a home equity conversion mortgage loan is that's some kind of hybrid document that I've never heard of before

and not violate the law wait okay you go to conversion for every crime there has to be a

me a civil harm so i would look at conversion for every criminal act where there is a victim

So this looks like illegal conversion.

and claim that it is part of an illegal conversion scheme, that these guys are going to get real excited.

It used to be that conversion was a cause of action and conversion has been converted to a criminal statute now under the theft statute.

agreement to conversion have to be in the record for it to be an allowable or agreed upon record

When I was asking, doesn't a statement of agreement have to be attached to these conversions

It used to be that criminal, that conversion of real property was a, was sueable under

conversion.

You can't sue under conversion anymore.

I filed a conversion from a 13 to a 7

While I was doing work in Washington DC back in Y2K conversion timeframe, which is 98

against them. Yeah. Conversion. Well after we'd won a case, came home a week later to

they don't have the right to do the foreclosure, that's criminal conversion. Okay. That's

a crime. That would be a crime in every state. We used to have conversion as a cause of action

in Texas but they changed the code so that, excuse me, so that conversion comes under

because I can't find any proof of conversion. I can find proof of insinuating legal capacity.

One count in there, I sued for conversion, he took my property, he had no legal right

No, and there was a reason I put a conversion count in there.

Theft and conversion.

In Texas, conversion has been consolidated into the theft statute.

ignore them and just write them a letter sue them sue them for fraudulent conversion

fraudulent conversion so well it's conversion that they're doing

okay but here in texas conversion is no longer a separate thing it's now here in texas it's

fraud and you just specify that the fraud was committed by the conversion of and that's what

they're attempting to do they're trying to convert your privacy facilitate the conversion

and we have lots of them. I have Texas Water Board, Texas Ground Water Conversion,

Okay. Case law regarding conversion of a state criminal offense into a civil municipal offense,

being applicable to my friend. Forced conversion of a personal private property to commercial

conversion.

This is attempted proper conversion by the county of private property so that they can

So not only are we going to be going after the unlawful taking, the unlawful conversion,

In Texas, there used to be the criminal act of conversion and that was specific to real property.

But they moved that into theft now and turned conversion into a cause of action.

If this guy doesn't have authority to do that, that's conversion.

Okay, aside from the possible conversion issue,

So even if it's not conversion and he had authority to do that,

In California, you're going to have a conversion statute

Conversion goes to theft of real property

Conversion in Texas is no longer a crime

Everywhere I see that conversion lawsuit, I see 31.02 attached to it

What they say is conversion that I called it theft and they're claiming that it should be

Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Hold on conversion you reference the term from conversion

Apparently conversion is the civil version of stealing somebody's stuff

Stealing someone's property was conversion

And the civil version is conversion. So you claimed conversion and theft or just conversion?

They complained in their motion to dismiss that I misnamed it and that I should have called it conversion and that

You know, that's one of their reasons for why my complaint should be dismissed because I didn't call it conversion. I called it theft

To amend the pleading and change the term theft to conversion

Never mentioned theft again and only conversion and if they mentioned

she's committing fraud, conversion, and defocation against...

email and ask me about the tort claim for conversion.

You want me to have some religious conversion here and decide that everything is wrong.

and then later attach through conversion a civil infraction into a criminal offense.

So you start it out with action to recover personal property, inverse condemnation, conversion

But that is what they're using to get that ultimate power into their hands is the fraudulent conversion of our system of government into a revenue system that drains it from us and transfers it to them

That's called conversion. That's theft.

The cause of action is action to recover personal property, inverse condemnation, conversion.

Well, that is interesting. You mentioned conversion.

The interesting thing about conversion here in Texas, conversion used to be a civil action.

He says through conversion, if you keep doing this, he gave me a stern warning, if you continue

to keep doing this, through conversion, they can up it to a misdemeanor if you continue

Microsoft Word has the absolute worst HTML conversion engine that exists, okay?

So that right there would be an unconstitutional conversion of a

And he was served bright and early on a Tuesday morning with a 42-USD 1983 lawsuit for conversion

If it's not in there, then you file a criminal charge for conversion or theft against the

Well, I mean, it's still conversion, because you didn't have a proof jacket or a door to take my property.

You still conversion in the spill inverse condonation.

Keep the conversion and add felony theft.

Okay, so I'd say fraud is very high on the list, not to mention conversion, which is the actual fraud they're committing.

So the charge will be conversion unless the cause of action, depending upon how they've got it set up in the case law now, used to conversion was a form of fraud but a separate cause of action.

It had to be knowing and willful to do conversion.

So you'll have to look and see depending upon what court you're going into as to how that court views conversion.

They may still see it as conversion separate unto itself.

But now if you do sue them in the state, then you've got to make that same check at the state level as to whether or not the state has rolled it all up into a single cause of action under fraud or whether or not they still consider conversion a separate thing.

sophisticated conversions I had to make to get this thing to work. But I've got it worked

Now, remember, there are lots of cases saying that this is not a conversion of private property, but if you read those cases carefully, those cases all deal with a vehicle that is used as a motor vehicle for commercial purposes.

In a civil suit, you sue based on a defined cause of action, fraud, conversion, quantum merit.

is conversion, seven is abusive process, eight is negligence, nine is failure to screen

And in as much as a public official may only do what they are specifically authorized to do, it would be who's the city to show that they have authority to make this conversion.

Ninth Circuit Court conversion cases

Is that better to go than conversion?

If you're asking for monetary damage towards it, like for a conversion case, you have to put a dollar value on the property, I presume.

with counsel present after full disclosure free of conversion.

That's fraud, that's theft, that's conversion, however you want to put it.

That's what they're doing. It's an illegal conversion, i.e., it is fraud because no privilege was exercised.

And in the past, you and I have talked about filing a conversion suit and talked about a breach of contract suit.

Well, conversion is outright fraud.

Most states, Texas being one of them, no longer has a separate cause of action for conversion.

It's all covered by fraud, which is what conversion actually is.

So they kind of go together, but the difference is that the conversion can involve criminal elements, whereas the breach of contract almost never does.

So when I say that you need to file a conversion suit, that's not exactly what I mean.

But then if you can show that that conversion is a result of the breach of contract, then you can use it to strengthen your breach of contract suit because conversion is fraud.

conversion when taking or seizing the certificate of origin in violation of the Fifth Amendment.

as well as committing the tour of conversion

because this goes into this, this actually just nails it all down and how the state by their silence and failure to fully inform the sovereign people of the rising of the offer of the contract was induced by fraud and committing the tour to conversion.

attempted breach of contract or a conversion. That's an even better. It's a form of fraud.

into state owned and taxable land. That's conversion. That's fraud.

going to be filing her hearings on set for July 7. We're going to file a motion for conversion from

to the conversion of the arbitration award. The judge basically kind of like scolded me.

get on the road in the first place it is fraud through conversion every single

And so with that, we also found a couple other ones, conversion, civil rights, constitutional rights.

that there's an impairment of a contract here and do i want is just considered conversion

I found a lot of stuff, but I just have two claims and I got fraud and I have conversion,

Well, now make sure that Chicago isn't like Texas and most other places where conversion has been classified as a form of fraud.

And it will be fraud by conversion, but it will still be fraud.

No, the conversion is pretty specific and then there's the Consumer Fraud and Protection Act.

sue for fraud. So those two claims and conversion, those two claims, I'm never going to drop.

Then there's conversion, which is the amount of the property that was converted plus legal interest.

Any value of property that you lost due to conversion doesn't matter.

Now, once I get the other things going on, they technically stole my car that night, but however, conversion is a form of larceny.

Now, when you say larceny, understand something, that here in Texas, they lump conversion under fraud.

The conversion is another form of extortion, essentially, but the way it's broadly defined across the country is a form of larceny.

It's like a common law conversion or something like that.

Unauthorized possession and... Okay, that's how the crime of conversion is defined, but the cause of action for a civil side may not be defined that way.

Here, conversion falls under both the criminal fraud statute and the civil suit statute.

It has to be stated as fraud by conversion.

It can't just be conversion.

It has to be fraud by conversion.

Well, try to find something that deals with the cause of action for conversion in Illinois and see how the courts have recognized it as such.

And then I also have a conversion claim, and then I have a rights claim,

Well, then you're going to have to sue them for an illegal taking and conversion.

No, it's called conversion. What they did to get the car out of the parking lot, that was theft.

What they did to get the title to it so they could sell it and keep the money, that's conversion.

the conversion of the title over to their name so they could sell it at auction, those things.

and I'm suing the towing company and the apartment complex for conversion.

or the value of the property that was taken, and conversion is a tort.

Now you mentioned, you mentioned conversion.

Conversion makes me think federal.

so my count is still conversion and it is for the polytilling company and the courthouse

So the harm happened with the stealing, the conversion, and you're looking for damages.

They converted the car for their own means, so I have a conversion claim, and then I brought

Would that be like there's a conversion?

So one of my claims is conversion, and under conversion in Illinois for towing specifically,

because I forgot to put conversion. He stole my phone at the hospital.

trespass with shadows we have conversion and if they didn't dispute it that means

a couple of my claims including conversion.

If you get your stuff back, you can't claim the full amount for the conversion,

I got conversion to stick.

My damages have been whittled down because I didn't have some of the legitimate conversion

BNP Paribas got nailed because part of the money conversion used US dollars okay example number two how is it that the US court system has authority over the narco traffickers that call Mexico or Central America places home

negligent misrepresentation and conversion.

and conversion and etc, etc. And the federal is obviously declaratory judgment against

Really important. You know what those are. Let me give you one for conversion. It's only got four

They did something and they shouldn't have and that's all it takes for conversion

So for this conversion, there would be those four check boxes