Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

The only time the attorney general in Texas has original jurisdiction in a prosecution

Russell Mortland filed an appeal where we challenged the jurisdiction of the court for lack of a criminal complaint in a court record

Do the cops in Texas have any jurisdiction over that and is that a reasonable cause?

But then an unusual thing happened is the federal government stepped in and they did a petition to intervene. And so they intervened in the case and removed it supposedly, but they didn't have jurisdiction because it was in the state court.

A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a state court except as expressly authorized by act of Congress or were necessary in aid of its jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate its judgments.

See, he didn't have jurisdiction at all. So it's not necessary to aid of his jurisdiction because he just flat didn't have any. There was a state court hearing set and he told the state court not to let me plead anymore, the son of a bleep. What do you think about that crap?

He says that there was a state jurisdictional issue, a federal tax lien, and what he's going to find out if he does more research is this, that what they're doing federally to him removing and all that removal is based on a case ruling.

which includes subparagraph 17, which of course limits their jurisdiction in states to where there's a legislative session of territory.

It's the ultimate issue of jurisdiction, and it's under that case, and I suggest you get on my website, nahls.org, stands for North American Historical Law Society, and read my two newsletters.

Nahls, the letters, it stands for North American Historical Law Society, the first letters, nahls.org. That's it. And you'll find that the Butler case is the key. When you go into a jurisdictional motion and say the federal government doesn't have any jurisdiction in the state, because the federal government is limited under Article 1, Section 8, subparagraph 17,

So what does it say? They go back to the U.S. versus Butler for the jurisdiction of the federal government.

Okay, if the government says anything in any way remotely connected to tax, the states have absolutely zero jurisdiction, is that what you're saying?

No, no, no, I'm not saying that. I'm saying that they're claiming that the federal government has jurisdiction, period, straight across the board.

Wait a minute, you sound like Ralph Winnerud now. You're so general. If I'm getting this right, you're saying that the states have zero jurisdiction over anything. Is that what I'm getting?

in that boy's jurisdiction, Johnson v. Irvett.

Did you raise the issue of subject matter jurisdiction?

to gain jurisdiction.

he'll reduce the complaint to an information submitted to the court of jurisdiction along with the criminal complaint.

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

and that's what gives jurisdiction to the court.

impersonal jurisdiction.

When I go into a jurisdiction, the first guy I want to get to is the judge.

and determined that it rose to a level to invoke the jurisdiction of the court,

Normally, people just file a challenge to the jurisdiction.

because I maintain the judge had no subject matter jurisdiction,

And without subject matter jurisdiction, the judge is civilly prone.

in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

last day or so, Friday and to jurisdictionary show, I think you'll see that the levels are

Now, we presented case law where a challenge to the jurisdiction was made for lack of a criminal complaint in the court record.

It says, we examine the court record and find no complaint bestowing jurisdiction on the court.

Reason being, no criminal accusation by some credible person, no subject matter jurisdiction, period.

In an envelope, cause his name to be written across the seal and forward it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction.

and that complaint gives the magistrate subject matter jurisdiction for the purpose of an examining trial and that purpose only.

That transfers jurisdiction.

And in getting to that, I'm gonna walk through the basic due process of how jurisdiction goes to the court.

These documents give the court jurisdiction for the purpose of holding and examining trial.

and thereby moves jurisdiction.

So what the courts said when they saw this, they said, holy mackerel, everybody loses jurisdiction at this point.

So they said, well, in that case, the magistrate has jurisdiction until the time of indictment.

So how does the mayor have jurisdiction?

because a magistrate can only have jurisdiction for the purpose of holding an examining trial.

So whether he had jurisdiction after that or not, there's nothing he's allowed to do.

She told me she didn't have knowledge of whether or not she had jurisdiction.

She did not know still in late December whether or not she had jurisdiction.

He didn't know if he had jurisdiction.

The International Criminal Court says it has no jurisdiction over Israeli forces in Gaza.

To see if the documents were sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

The documents did not invoke the jurisdiction of the court

So the court had no subject matter jurisdiction

Now, what you'd normally do is file a challenge to the jurisdiction

You know, we tried to file the challenge to the jurisdiction

You see, the judge didn't have subject matter jurisdiction

The police are not going to send him a challenge to his jurisdiction

No, the judge entered the plea for him, so that doesn't bind him in a way it would if he came before the court and accepted the court's jurisdiction

Win a case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience

yes and just just one quick statement whenever I go into a jurisdiction and I

is trying to enforce an ordinance and in what jurisdiction are they trying to

that the commissioner's court passed, and they extended their jurisdiction under the, what is it,

I am not a citizen of the United States under the jurisdiction thereof or subject to the

jurisdiction.

subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

advocacy jurisdiction of everything falling under commerce, what it really is if you start

Jurisdictionary for the Graves, 8 p.m.

this deals with jurisdiction that's outside of Annex Municipality.

This JP, okay, apparently has some jurisdiction at the county realm, but this has nothing

Now I have evidence that at this point in time, the court was without jurisdiction because there was no warrant.

First thing you do if you get charged with a crime is get jurisdictionary.

When you case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

in any territory under its jurisdiction.

Win a case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.

They passed a law recently in Texas that a policeman from any jurisdiction in Texas,

if he personally observes a crime in another jurisdiction, he can act.

their jurisdiction.

This was around July, I believe, 3rd, 2005, and it was 12 miles outside their jurisdiction.

The most sure way is to go after subject matter jurisdiction.

in conjunction with the challenge to the jurisdiction, claiming a number of things and all of them

Due process violation or subject matter jurisdiction makes it go away.

I look at that and the judge would have to say, I have no subject matter jurisdiction.

We also filed a challenge to the jurisdiction.

come and challenge my jurisdiction?

Well this judge acted without jurisdiction.

jurisdiction from the beginning, ab initio.

You see, when the policeman takes you before a magistrate, he has to present a criminal complaint to the magistrate in order to give the magistrate subject matter jurisdiction.

in Amity jurisdiction

with Jurisdictionary, the affordable,

now you can too. Jurisdictionary

Then they have to serve, that invokes the subject matter jurisdiction of the court. Then they have to serve process, that's the summits that has to be served on the person who's the defendant, the person supposed to pay the mortgage.

In jurisdictionary, I haven't read the course, but I know Frederick, and I know he knows what he's talking about, and in there he'll talk about, I'm sure, demanding proof of ownership of the note, or that you're the holder in due course of the note.

So the court's subject matter of jurisdiction wasn't invoked, and then I believe, too, wasn't the service of process insufficient?

We checked the records and then filed a challenge to the jurisdiction.

But generally, all the rules of civil procedure provide for filing a motion to vacate a judgment that's entered without jurisdiction.

pointing out that the judgment should be vacated because the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction or there was no service of process sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction.

Yes, the subject matter jurisdiction may be challenged no matter how remote in history.

And I gave this challenge to the jurisdiction to Robin.

because basically at this point in time, if you can't raise an issue regarding a failure to confer subject matter jurisdiction

by filing an appropriate complaint or serve process properly and confer personal jurisdiction, then, you know, she's pretty much out of luck.

And this is on top of me counterclaiming and suing them, basically challenging jurisdiction

I go for the criminal because I just go straight from the jurisdiction and attack them.

And so now the burden falls on them to prove that they even had jurisdiction.

I was going to mention earlier that Mark mentioned that he hadn't read jurisdictionary.

And by the way, Randy, speaking of jurisdictionary, where's my copy, huh?

Because Randy absconded with my copy of jurisdiction.

I got jurisdictionary.

You ordered jurisdictionary.

You don't, that's the thing, I was just listening to Dr. Graves on jurisdictionary.

You need to get jurisdictionary.

jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with twenty two years

and forward them to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction.

and it is enough to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

you know he would have to have it within the county because that's the only place his jurisdiction exists

so they're both under the same rule so yeah he only has jurisdiction within the county so it would have to be

because it leaves the judge without subject matter jurisdiction

and everybody has just been filing a challenge to the jurisdiction

rather than a challenge to the jurisdiction

judge for acting without subject matter jurisdiction.

If he has no jurisdiction, he has no authority and no power, and he has no immunity.

You claim he has no jurisdiction, you challenged jurisdiction, they didn't prove jurisdiction,

You've challenged jurisdiction, he failed to prove jurisdiction.

for acting without subject matter jurisdiction in this case.

When jurisdiction is challenged it must be proven.

If he fails to prove jurisdiction then he has no jurisdiction and in this case he failed

to my jurisdiction.

They're going to challenge my jurisdiction in a little more forceful manner.

He has no subject matter jurisdiction.

You can sue the judge if he acts without subject matter jurisdiction or in personam jurisdiction,

And for the judge for acting without subject matter jurisdiction, in effect, he is impersonating

win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to

within the jurisdiction by the use of all lawful means, to issue all process intended aid in preventing suppression of crime

In the case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

going to file a challenge to my jurisdiction

give me a demonstration of my lack of jurisdiction

jurisdiction though revert back to municipal court

jurisdiction on a traffic ticket can they? No

a long discussion on the movement of jurisdiction.

They lose subject matter jurisdiction until a magistrate makes a probable cause determination.

Had a duty to determine that these factors existed before so that he could determine whether or not he had subject matter jurisdiction

Win a case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.

jurisdiction or even a big-time jurisdiction, some major metropolitan area, whatever, where

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.

On your advertisement, you're advertising Jurisdictionary.com.

When someone calls me in about one of their issues, I can tell if they've been through Jurisdictionary.

If you can't get an attorney in a jurisdiction, you just go to the court and ask them to appoint you one.

And I know I said that on the ad, on the jurisdictionary.

Get jurisdictionary, listen to us, listen to Tony.

that's fair warning to the judge that I'm going to pull you out of this jurisdiction and take you to the federal courts

You don't have any jurisdiction.

They didn't know he didn't have jurisdiction in the county courthouse.

You have no jurisdiction here.

I told her I only use that one to punish a jurisdiction anyway.

jurisdiction of the court.

Now if I challenge it, they convert no jurisdiction to the court because it's not signed, it's

it's printed that way, whatever jurisdiction they worked for, they acted in concert and

if he's one of them, anybody involved with the complaint who would have any kind of jurisdiction

...and where they have this jurisdiction and how they can disregard what is clear constitutional rights

used until you had appealed that, you know, lack of jurisdiction.

No, a mandamus can be used at any time, especially when it goes to jurisdiction,

subject matter jurisdiction, because it would stop all the proceedings.

It's an instant remedy. If the court has no subject matter jurisdiction, you should not be

But he's also going to know that he has no jurisdiction over you. So he can't do anything

he has zero jurisdiction. And he knows anything he does to you is going to come back on him

the Jurisdictionary Show, yes, actually the Jurisdictionary Show is carried on Rule of

We have Jurisdictionary on Mondays at 6 p.m., Mondays from 6 to 8.

We are a network and we produce many shows and Jurisdictionary is one of our shows.

It seems that the different jurisdictions may be talking to each other because we're

So it doesn't even matter if they're out of jurisdiction, because they put us up in

were not in their jurisdiction. No they actually pulled us over right after the jurisdictional

got if they see you 400 yards outside the jurisdiction they have jurisdiction that far

street but then the other jurisdiction commit a crime. They have jurisdiction 400 yards in. Here

follow you from their jurisdiction into another jurisdiction then they can stop you. If they're

jurisdiction you won't get. However what was the nature of the probable cause of stop? Actually

If you're, if you're challenging your, the jurisdiction of the court,

And if, if the law commands that they dismiss for lack of jurisdiction,

an appeal is inappropriate here because they never had jurisdiction to start with.

challenging jurisdiction and they, and the court says, no, we have it. And you say I'm appealing

jurisdiction. I mean, there's, there's the only stuff in the file is what I've created,

jurisdiction, which they don't have either. Most of this is insufficiency of service.

where's your jurisdiction to begin with? You don't have any. Yeah, subject matter. Yeah,

jurisdiction, all criminal charges against me. If I go out and rent a uniform at the uniform store

are you going to file a challenge to my jurisdiction?

If he doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction, he's impersonating a public official.

And that's because they have no jurisdiction?

but not here in this case at this time. You're not a judge because you don't have your jurisdiction

here. Anytime he doesn't have a subject matter of jurisdiction, he's not a judge. He's just a person.

I believe, which, if they had jurisdiction within the state, might apply. But looking at state codes

and all the jurisdictional stuff that Larry B. Craft has got out there,

So if he's within the jurisdiction of the state, and it goes to hierarchy of law, if he's a fed

within the jurisdictional boundaries of the state, because he's a fed, the federal law

and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience

And are required in almost every jurisdiction

In some jurisdictions they may require

And check your jurisdiction

According to whatever the rules are within that jurisdiction

Court jurisdictions will require

Jurisdictions in which that will come up

What's the jurisdiction

And then you'll go into jurisdiction

And you'll talk about jurisdiction

Of what jurisdiction is

A court may have jurisdiction

And jurisdiction is at any court

If they had jurisdiction

To the idea of who has jurisdiction

Jurisdictions

An issue of jurisdiction comes up like

Okay, where's the jurisdiction

Or the court has no jurisdiction to hear it

In most jurisdictions around the country

Judge, you do not have subject matter jurisdiction in this matter

Became a criminal trespasser and denied you subject matter jurisdiction

Get the court in any way the chance to deny themselves subject matter jurisdiction

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney

But as long as the judge adds jurisdiction over you, you're going to have to get past that.

Because once they have jurisdiction, they have judicial immunity.

He has to lose jurisdiction some other way or anytime somebody wanted to get rid of the judge,

he's already lost jurisdiction of the case anywhere.

As soon as they exceed their authority, they may have lost jurisdiction anyway.

You guys, you don't have anything there to have jurisdiction, nothing.

The jurisdiction, absent an answer from the prosecutor, leaves the court without jurisdiction.

so the court never acquired jurisdiction.

pleading the jurisdiction motion to dismiss is moving the court,

stating that you don't feel that they have jurisdiction

and this court has subject matter jurisdiction.

as if he had jurisdiction, which he had none.

and he thinks he has full jurisdiction.

that what they're doing is beyond their jurisdiction.

They have an answer displayed at the jurisdiction.

telling them that you were harmed by this constable acting without jurisdiction

and by the justice of the peace and the prosecutor for acting without jurisdiction.

Some jurisdictions have no limits.

You can do videotape deposition in some jurisdictions where you can put a video camera in place.

And you have to look in the various jurisdictions to see what the rules allow.

In most jurisdictions, that's what's required.

In some jurisdictions out there, that's one of the procedures that begins

a week ago, summary judgments in most jurisdictions are not about having a hearing.

That's a sad state of affairs, but unfortunately it's reality in some jurisdictions.

I've been in some other jurisdictions where they didn't even know what the rule book was.

You see, so far, as best I can tell, they have no jurisdiction in this thing.

The judge does not have subject matter jurisdiction.

So the discussion to dismiss was based on, it's essentially what's called the plea to the jurisdiction.

You've asked them to plead their jurisdictional date and specify why the judge could retain jurisdiction.

and said, look, you don't have jurisdiction.

I mean the lack of subject matter jurisdiction,

with regards to pleaded jurisdiction.

But absent a written response, they can't get jurisdiction, which means on appeal,

they'll be absent any records showing any jurisdictional,

the jurisdictional answer to your motion to dismiss based on a pleaded jurisdiction.

that the trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.

Challenged subject matter jurisdiction, that's between you and the judge.

If the judge doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction,

You can't be a judge unless you have jurisdiction.

That's the whole idea of jurisdiction.

You're not going to file a challenge to my jurisdiction.

And since you challenged jurisdiction and he hasn't answered or hasn't proven,

Finally came back and said that he didn't have authority to rule that the municipal court never had original jurisdiction because they had a defective complaint.

So they still had no original jurisdiction.

I have a complaint in front of me that meets the requisites and I see jurisdiction.

No, but I did just get jurisdiction area the other day.

Jurisdictionary is on Mondays, 6 to 8.

Okay, so it sounds like they're really kind of mixing up the jurisdictions here.

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience

Jurisdictionary was created

With Jurisdictionary

You find ways where he has violated his jurisdiction, and then you can sue him as well.

that surrounds the jurisdiction wherein the federal territory exists, you can migrate the state statute to the federal and prosecute him in the federal with the state statute.

So if there's a well established statute in another jurisdiction that addresses something our legislature has yet to address, then you can migrate a statute

The jurisdiction, whatever jurisdiction you're in, their law is the highest law.

But if you can just simply attack the judge's jurisdiction, you've got a good shot at bringing him back to the state.

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

Unless you can go back and show that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, you're

matter jurisdiction when he violated laws relating to his office and moved to have the

When it goes to subject matter jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged

So even if the judge had subject matter jurisdiction, if he violated a law relating to his office,

The thing I would want to find out is what jurisdiction the officer has concerning motor

They're the police department of statewide jurisdiction,

and they will set the standards for the other jurisdictions.

is that we've been trying for many years to reestablish the original jurisdiction.

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

And we're back to the area of jurisdiction.

Causes of action, we'll discuss which court has jurisdiction.

Possible jurisdictions could be where the accident actually occurred,

any court that has essentially concurrent jurisdiction and has venue,

They have county jurisdiction, but they tend to only have venue within their precinct.

Now, the complication of all of this of where jurisdiction and venue comes in

If they get into jurisdiction and don't address venue first, they may have waived it,

because jurisdiction and venue are like captions in the front of your pleading,

exactly what the cause of action is, why the court has jurisdiction.

The Texas cases, if the other party has a problem with what you've pled and thinks you haven't issued a cause of action, they generally don't move to dismiss for a lack of jurisdiction or for no cause of action.

except if you're trying to create confusion and animosity within the context of that jurisdiction in order to exit the jurisdiction.

No, keep in mind that they don't have any real jurisdiction over you.

There are guys out there saying, oh, they don't have jurisdiction.

being back-to-back in several jurisdictions?

You need to file for it at least seven days in most of your jurisdiction,

Yes. When the judge issues an order in the courtroom, it's a real order. It just doesn't have to be, that one doesn't have to be written. What the judge says in the court stands. So, absolutely, if she says be there, be there. A lot of these guys say, oh, they don't have such a matter of jurisdiction, you don't have to go. Well, always go to court.

The Sudanese government claimed the International Court lacks jurisdiction since Sudan is not

And that's like 125 or 175, depending on what the jurisdiction is to file the suit.

Because absent proper service, the documents do not invoke the jurisdiction of the court.

of the peace to ensure that she had, or he had, subject matter jurisdiction.

You cannot waive subject matter jurisdiction.

And if they did not serve you properly, they did not invoke the jurisdiction of the court.

without subject matter jurisdiction.

And if the JP court didn't have jurisdiction, then the county court would.

Because in a criminal matter, the judge has jurisdiction over you.

citizen to give the court subject matter jurisdiction.

That's what they must have to give them subject matter jurisdiction and it gives you a accuser

to the jurisdiction claiming that the court has no jurisdiction as there is no accuser.

But as opposed to subject matter jurisdiction, the judge is walking on thin ice here.

What I've been maintaining is that if a judge acts without subject matter jurisdiction,

the normal knee-jerk reaction is to file a challenge to the jurisdiction.

are you going to file a challenge to my jurisdiction?

or not he has subject matter jurisdiction.

So, if the judge doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction, what is he?

This thing of asking the judge to rule that he doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction,

If the judge is up there exerting jurisdiction when he doesn't have it, that's criminal.

It was the judge's duty to make sure he had subject matter jurisdiction before he attempted

Every case I've read on a challenge to the jurisdiction for a lack of criminal complaint

The court said, we examine the court record and find no criminal affidavit giving jurisdiction

clerk of the court of jurisdiction.

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

Well, I called him this morning and I got a call back from an officer of that jurisdiction

and that officer tried to tell me that they didn't have a jurisdiction

of the jurisdiction and so he had the sergeant call me

Every one of these, if you check your own tax code, you'll find something you never heard of that puts you within the federal jurisdiction.

So you're always going to be something in a federal jurisdiction.

Well, I'd like to discuss how the court gets jurisdiction over you.

You're talking about impersonal jurisdiction.

I know, but what are the rules of jurisdiction?

the way the judge gets impersonal jurisdiction is with a...

It's a question of jurisdiction.

But at that time, the state has no jurisdiction until they reach you,

No, no, the court gets jurisdiction when the complaint is filed.

That's what gives them jurisdiction.

for the law that gives them jurisdiction.

or cost them subject matter jurisdiction.

He don't have subject matter jurisdiction, period,

has no jurisdiction based on law.

the many states must give up jurisdiction for Title 8.

unless they can prove that the state released jurisdiction,

but that doesn't make it legal or doesn't give jurisdiction.

They have to prove jurisdiction,

in order to have jurisdiction.

They have to show jurisdiction, and in order to have jurisdiction,

The federal government does not have jurisdiction on Fort Sam Houston

I mean, the federal government doesn't have exclusive jurisdiction.

then the state has jurisdiction on the property as well as the federal government,

but the federal government isn't excluded from jurisdiction

If the state never ceded it, then how do they have jurisdiction?

But if I'm outside the state, I don't know if I have a standing to go into a foreign sovereign jurisdiction and claim standing to report crime.

Then I was interested in asking about is that political jurisdiction, specifically political jurisdiction,

By political jurisdiction, do you mean that as distinct from statutory jurisdiction?

If you don't want to be in court and you feel like they don't have subject matter jurisdiction,

yourself to them is because first the political jurisdiction challenge comes in

Well, under certain circumstances, they don't have jurisdiction over you

or naturalized are citizens and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

if all those things are subject to that jurisdiction.

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

But they gave me the policing agency of statewide jurisdiction that sets the pace for all other

the jurisdiction up to incredible potential litigation.

Generally, if I'm going to take on a jurisdiction, I want everybody disqualified so I tend to

the grand jury, I can show every judge in the jurisdiction is a low-down, rotten, belly-crawling,

In your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.

subject matter jurisdiction

to transfer jurisdiction there

there's no subject matter jurisdiction

jurisdiction without those documents

there is no subject matter jurisdiction

a jurisdiction that had those

and forward them to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction

You file a challenge to the jurisdiction?

One of my favorites when I'm going into a jurisdiction is I'll ask to see the morning

it shall be the duty of the magistrate to keep the peace in his jurisdiction

and forwarded to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction

in order for the court to have subject matter jurisdiction

in an envelope caused by a name derivative across the seal and forth to the court jurisdiction

because in no jurisdiction have I found the records in the court record

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney

except by submission of written motion to the court of jurisdiction,

except for submission of written motion to the court of jurisdiction.

Then, if you have been arrested with no warrant, it is the warrant based on a valid criminal complaint that gives the court subject matter jurisdiction.

He prepares a warrant, and it is that warrant that gives the court subject matter jurisdiction. Now, they would have had it if the warrant existed already, and the policeman could arrest on the warrant.

cause his name to be written across the seal of the envelope, and forward it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction.

Next time you get appointed, it's going to be in a different jurisdiction, far away from this one.

the party loses the benefit of the jurisdiction, I'm sorry, of the justification and is considered a trespasser ab initio.

Depends on the statute, the state of the statute in the jurisdiction you're in.

So I'm kind of excited about that because it challenges your jurisdiction and states

And the Court of Appeals looked at the jurisdiction.

And they said, okay, jurisdiction flows from the arresting officer, gives a complaint to the magistrate.

We lost jurisdiction, so how do we fix this?

If we rule on this, that they lost jurisdiction, we flush the jails.

So they ruled that the magistrate has jurisdiction until indictment.

A magistrate has no jurisdiction to do anything but an examining trial.

They have no jurisdiction.

the only court that has jurisdiction over tax issues is in Travis County.

then there is no jurisdiction.

And you can show they have no jurisdiction to act.

then the tax court in Travis County wouldn't have impersonal jurisdiction over me

There was an indictment so jurisdiction was done with.

Absent a criminal complaint, there is no subject matter jurisdiction.

The first thing the judge has to do is show that he has subject matter jurisdiction

Before you even talk to the prosecutor, the judge, if he don't have subject matter jurisdiction, he's a criminal

Go to subject matter jurisdiction, make him prove that the law applies to you

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney

If a judge acts outside of his jurisdiction, he loses his civil immunity anyway

In other words, right now, if a judge acts outside his or her jurisdiction

He has to be certain that the pleadings before the court are sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

So the complaint the officer would attempt to file is insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

Absent jurisdiction, he's just like me going down to the uniform store and renting a uniform and a badge

If he doesn't, he doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction

Well, he admits on the record that he didn't have jurisdiction to hear any amulty cases

But he didn't say it, he did not have jurisdiction

And he says, put him in a file, but he didn't have jurisdiction to do anything with those

And I said, and he stated on the record, this is a multi-jurisdiction, he had no jurisdiction in multi-cases

He acted in retaliation that means he lost his jurisdiction or something?

jurisdiction.

sitting next to me, that he said that he never had jurisdiction, so he wanted to withdraw

He admitted that he never had jurisdiction from the start.

had no subject matter jurisdiction.

You can file the admission of no subject matter jurisdiction as judicial notice, not something

And he's done something really stupid, admitting that he had no subject matter jurisdiction.

And you're going for right to travel jurisdiction?

In other words, the judge would stay in her jurisdiction, I would stay on mine.

well, Joe, if we have this hearing, will you grant the judge jurisdiction?

if we have this hearing, will you grant the judge jurisdiction?

The first time due process is violated, then jurisdiction ceases and is no more.

I've been doing a lot of research this week about jurisdiction, you know,

Challenge to the jurisdiction based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction

because you'll maintain that the court never had subject matter jurisdiction, so everything is void.

Obviously, you know, I accused Dr. Graves when he said that he wrote jurisdictionary for an eighth grader.

And people are using jurisdictionary to homeschool their kids, too.

And I asked, and you had already gotten jurisdictionary.

So jurisdictionary is just very powerful.

No, the court has no jurisdiction.

Think in terms of jurisdiction, if I put on a robe and come into an empty courtroom

are you going to file a challenge to my jurisdiction?

Well, the judge is no different if he doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction,

is whether or not he has subject matter jurisdiction.

He has to consider all of those things that go to jurisdiction.

to invoke the jurisdiction of the court,

So I didn't file a challenge to the judge's jurisdiction.

He has an absolute duty to make sure he has that jurisdiction.

they'll go in there in charge and just simply claim that the judge didn't have jurisdiction.

in order to invoke the jurisdiction of the court.

It said or, so that got you into the jurisdiction. It doesn't seem to apply just to streets and thoroughfares. It seems to apply to the entire jurisdiction.

It's not under his jurisdiction.

We can charge the officer with acting without subject matter jurisdiction, impersonating a public official.

that will be in contact with the other local jurisdictions around Central Texas and for

general just at all, you know, because it's my understanding that these jurisdictions

data from the various jurisdictions.

Yeah, but Randy, even if it does, where's the law that allows these certain jurisdictions

to get evidence against somebody from some other jurisdiction?

Yeah, but how is it legal for one jurisdiction to obtain information and have it on file

and then another jurisdiction can just go and tap into that different jurisdictions database?

law this it has to get the federal funds must go through the local jurisdiction of the home

How about oath of office, being able to get the jurisdiction away from the court?

Randy, do you think that courts function in a dual jurisdiction being both under criminal and UCC at the same time?

And this nonsense of saying just because you walk in the courtroom, you give them jurisdiction, no, you don't.

A court gets jurisdiction statutorily.

It's very clear how they get jurisdiction, and if they have statutory jurisdiction, they have it.

So you would say, so based on the information within jurisdictionary,

but that doesn't come within Article 3 jurisdiction.

When we're in an airplane, it's a maritime jurisdiction.

No jurisdiction in the trial court.

Article 3 jurisdiction extends to the Constitution, the laws of the United States, and the treaties.

and Article 3 court has jurisdiction to entertain a case that sounds in,

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney

and it has to be property that belongs to the control and authority and jurisdiction of the United States,

of competent jurisdiction in Travis County or in any other county where venue lies. Now

with jurisdiction in the county in which the municipality is located.

declared void by a court of competent jurisdiction,

from a court of proper jurisdiction,

It appears they have a subject matter jurisdiction problem.

OK, now the defendant, how you didn't you didn't get me into admiralty jurisdiction because you haven't.

We were we were discussing this and maybe Brian has an answer for us about the jurisdiction in the national force.

Brian, do you do you know what this what the deal is with the jurisdiction of law enforcement inside the national forest?

Yes. And although the language is the same, you're mixing jurisdictional metaphors.

The jurisdiction of the national forest is presumed to be under the feds, but there's a shared jurisdiction with local state and law enforcement in order so that the sheriff will have the ability to patrol federal land in a non rainbow gathering setting and arrest people who are committing crimes.

So that which is why a federal actor is not subject to any jurisdiction of a state court, not by a subpoena.

But the federal law is that no federal actor, when he's acting within his capacity as a federal actor, is subject to any state jurisdiction.

Now, of course, if the federal actor is just in his home living his life and he goes outside and he shoots his neighbor, well, then, of course, he's subject to state jurisdiction.

He's not immune from state jurisdiction because his job is a federal agent.

But while he's acting as a federal employee, those actions are only subject to federal superior jurisdiction.

If the sheriff if the sheriff were out there and observed someone committing a crime, he has a concurrent jurisdiction where he can enforce the crime.

And whether or not you can get the prosecution to prosecute a law enforcement within that jurisdiction in any jurisdiction.

But I wanted to ask Brian one other question about this jurisdictional issue between the sheriff and the feds and such.

But specifically, the Idaho case, where the Idaho attorney general wanted to prosecute this person for committing this heinous crime in his jurisdiction,

because people would argue that the feds have no jurisdiction inside the state boundaries anyway,

The feds have jurisdiction over every inch of land within the United States.

And so the federal government has jurisdiction over every square inch of federal land.

They do have that jurisdiction, and there was those issues about, the Supreme Court issued those cases about,

So I can get all of the documents that were submitted after PACER was born, but all the documents that were filed prior to the birth of PACER in that jurisdiction are not available through PACER.

one of the bases for federal jurisdiction is the aspect of deciding federal law.

It's not to be confused with the court or jurisdiction where you're suing them, but

I guess that's going to depend on the jurisdiction.

When it comes to the federal jurisdiction,

there are absolutely definite limits to the federal jurisdiction.

Do you do a subject matter jurisdiction challenge?

Here's why I say it goes to subject matter jurisdiction.

the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

First thing the judge has to determine is whether or not he has jurisdiction,

of the facts. But if, you know, federal jurisdiction also has what they call diversity of citizenship.

court has jurisdiction over the defendant, not necessarily diversity of

the jurisdiction is in Oregon, or in this case, Pennsylvania, can you sue in

here and was doing business here, well, then they're assuming jurisdiction

jurisdiction issue rather than a sovereign jurisdiction issue. But that's

because the name will be written across the seal, forwarded through court jurisdiction.

And I've always had a problem, I guess, with all the claims of the federal government having jurisdiction over everybody and everything.

So it doesn't have jurisdiction.

If the crime was committed in this state in my locality against me that lives here in this state, how does the federal government get jurisdiction over anything?

You know, now we're getting into an area of shared jurisdiction.

Shared jurisdiction.

We use the shared jurisdiction.

Since these were not people acting as federal agents but acting in their private capacity, we have concurrent jurisdiction.

People say that if you enter a plea, then you gave the court jurisdiction.

You might have given them in personam jurisdiction, but you can always take that back.

The primary jurisdiction, and they most likely had in personam jurisdiction anyway,

that's the jurisdiction over the person as opposed to subject matter jurisdiction.

because I know jurisdiction is mostly state or county,

And then he will forward the records to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction.

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

jurisdiction, has to ensure that the pleadings are

jurisdiction of the court.

when he has not demonstrated his subject matter jurisdiction.

jurisdiction of the court.

because he has no subject matter jurisdiction.

But what I would do is I'd move it into the federal jurisdiction.

jurisdiction.

That's one jurisdiction allegation.

Second jurisdiction allegation is the fact

jurisdiction and to be free from unreasonable search

individual for the tort the state has exclusive jurisdiction to pursue

criminal affidavit the court is without subject matter jurisdiction and is has no more authority

upon such complaint and file the same in the court having jurisdiction, provided that in

It's physically positioned in Wise County, but it has jurisdiction over Jack County.

Well, that's one approach to it, most certainly. Let's see. Now the other thing though is what gives the court jurisdiction to even hear the case

It is specifically stated in the state constitution that it is the information or the indictment that grants jurisdiction to the court

So if you go by what the constitution itself states here in Texas, if only an indictment or information can grant jurisdiction to the court

The presentment of an indictment or information to a court invests the court with jurisdiction of the cause

Those two things are the only thing that grants the court jurisdiction of the cause

But the moment you proceed against me in this court acting without jurisdiction, you're going to have a whole can of worms you wasn't counting on

Yeah, you can tell them what I do is I sue your behind when you act without subject matter jurisdiction

So any time a DPS officer acts upon a vehicle that's not involved in a traffic anything, he's acting outside of his jurisdiction

The officer had no subject matter jurisdiction, period.

parking lot and the police had no authority to exercise jurisdiction.

responsibility insurance comes under transportation code and that only has jurisdiction on the

Alfred, he came on to private property where he had no subject matter jurisdiction.

matter jurisdiction.

No subject matter jurisdiction.

I'm still learning to do this process myself and Jurisdictionary has helped me a lot with

In this case, it'd be a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

You tell the judge why he has jurisdiction unless the case is already ongoing and it's

You want him to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction and then you step outside

Have a prayer, it has a jurisdiction section normally

Look at some of the motions, look in jurisdictions I have annoyed or in individual files

Same heading, same ending, they all have a jurisdiction section, they all have a statement of facts

He had no jurisdiction to enforce a Canadian law

These people who say you don't have jurisdiction,

I guarantee you, you can have it thrown out for like a subject matter jurisdiction simply

If the court acted completely without jurisdiction, everything they did is null and void.

The lower court had no jurisdiction...

Right, and there's only one time the attorney general is the prosecutor of original jurisdiction

That's the only time he's designated as the prosecutor of the original jurisdiction when it's a complaint against the county or district attorney

and forward it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction

In other words, who they can actually be applied to or what they can actually be applied to because it's no secret that federal jurisdiction, technically speaking in the terms of the Constitution, does not exist within the borders of the states.

Driver's license means any license or privilege to operate a motor vehicle issued under the laws of the home jurisdiction.

Now, notice, driver's license means any license or privilege to operate a motor vehicle under the laws of the home jurisdiction.

Home jurisdiction is a term that you would need to look up, but the title tells us this is doing information on a non-resident violator.

Now, I don't know if anyone is familiar with this here in Texas, but a municipal court in Texas does not have civil jurisdiction.

a jurisdiction of municipal court, a municipal court, including a municipal court of record, shall have exclusive original jurisdiction within the territorial limits of the municipality in all criminal cases.

Now, if you go a little further on, the municipal court shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the justice of a precinct in which the municipality is located in all criminal cases arising under state law.

You have no jurisdiction.

They have no jurisdiction over you

Are you going to file a challenge to my jurisdiction?

You disqualify the judge for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because he's not a judge

How do we get the Ninth Circuit to have jurisdiction?

I've had a problem with a lot of the legal reform guys who are saying, oh, if you put a dot on an I in this sentence, you give them jurisdiction.

If you cross this T too low, you give them jurisdiction.

You say the court doesn't have jurisdiction. They file for summary judgment.

You say, well, the court doesn't have jurisdiction. And all of a sudden, I think we're on break.

How do they have in person of jurisdiction of you to properly place you before the court

I know you said that there's an issue with subject matter jurisdiction

To actually have jurisdiction over you to place you before the court

Well because failure of due process doesn't cost them impersonal jurisdiction

Failure of due process causes them subject matter jurisdiction

And subject matter jurisdiction is a lot better because it cannot be waived

And subject matter jurisdiction must come first

They first must demonstrate that they have jurisdiction over the subject matter

And then they have to demonstrate that they have jurisdiction over the individual personally

Yeah but I can't be in personum jurisdiction in this case

That gives the county in personum jurisdiction over me

Now these other guys have some more arcane ways of arguing in personum jurisdiction

The court has to demonstrate subject matter jurisdiction

And there are a lot of ways for them to lose subject matter jurisdiction

Therefore, they are insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court

And I will maintain that it is the court's duty to prove up its jurisdiction before it attempts to exercise jurisdiction

And I'm tempted to go in and demand that the court stand down or prove up jurisdiction

Because if I don't raise an issue to subject matter jurisdiction

The court can act as if he has subject matter jurisdiction

But once I raise the issue of subject matter jurisdiction

Then the court no longer has subject matter jurisdiction until it proves that it has subject matter jurisdiction

Anyway, back to our original question of impersonal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction

So in going for subject matter jurisdiction I've got a lot of things I can deal with

Okay Randy, subject matter jurisdiction

Okay, so Randy, you were talking about subject matter jurisdiction

It's different in every jurisdiction

matter jurisdiction over me.

matter jurisdiction of the court.

How to force the court to prove up its jurisdiction because that will be the next place I go

I will claim that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction

Because the documents before the court are insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court

Okay, but he can still attack jurisdiction in standing

You can always attack subject matter jurisdiction, no matter how remote in history

They're not even from the same jurisdiction

Now, if the complaint is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the magistrate, the complaint

Sub-item 2, certificate of title statute of another jurisdiction, section 2A.105, or consumer law of this state, both decisional and statutory,

or of another jurisdiction, compliance and the effect of compliance or noncompliance with a certificate of title statute are governed by the law,

including the conflict of laws rules of the jurisdiction issuing the certificate until the earlier of surrender of the certificate or four months after the goods are removed from that jurisdiction.

Okay. The last part of it just says, four months after the goods are removed from that jurisdiction and thereafter until a new certificate of title is issued by another jurisdiction.

which I guess has a different jurisdictional, what would be the term, help me out here,

different jurisdictional venue agents.

I get people arguing that since the court is a corporation, they can't have jurisdiction.

and you challenge the jurisdiction of the court,

and if the court gets a ruling passed his challenge to jurisdiction,

It demands whenever a jurisdiction gives me any problem when I'm trying to find a record

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand 4 cd course

have won with our step by step course and now you can too Jurisdictionary was created

It was made from North Carolina that North Carolina federal courts have jurisdiction.

She can move to dismiss based on the fact that they have no jurisdiction.

and take jurisdiction just like they did with Randy Weaver.

And the other one was David Merlin's traffic-joinder motion to dismiss for lack of pastamon jurisdiction

Dr. Graves wrote a jurisdictionary so that an eighth grader could read it and understand it.

it's got the jurisdiction of the court and the limitation of actions,

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

allegation of bona fide jurisdiction because I have an arraignment on Tuesday,

am I correct in my thinking that I'm not under their jurisdiction?

You'll be under their jurisdiction.

told him, oh, you're not under their jurisdiction.

You're not under their jurisdiction.

He's got to file his documents in the court of the jurisdiction of the case.

Now, another aspect of a lot of things we discuss when it comes to federal rules is we don't apply what the Constitution says federal jurisdiction is.

And that is Federal jurisdiction

But the hour of the times is an excellent series on the limits of Federal jurisdiction

But it is, it has to do with jurisdiction and what you give up when you are contracting with some type of entity

But yes, the limits of Federal jurisdiction is incredible

That real jurisdiction isn't there

And unless you are within a Federal enclave, there is absolutely no Federal jurisdiction

And thereby inadvertently stepping into the jurisdiction

of law that says exclusive appellate jurisdiction and what this is, just to catch everybody

jurisdiction, the term exclusive appellate jurisdiction as far as I can tell only appears

Fortunately, it looks like the phrase, exclusive appellate jurisdiction, is not against the

If the municipal court, having exclusive appellate jurisdiction, rules in violation of constitution,

overturned if you can't appeal it to a court of competent jurisdiction?

they're the agency of statewide jurisdiction and they pretty well set the tone for the

appeal is filed that court loses subject matter jurisdiction and this act was a

do not have jurisdiction on common law without a invitation by the property

arguments that are supposed to be under the jurisdiction of the trial court. So, Randy,

But without the upper part embodying the court jurisdiction, my information as plaintiff and them as defendant

If there is not, the court does not have jurisdiction.

The promise to appear gives them no subject matter jurisdiction.

Pick your cards really carefully. Yeah, the only possible chance he would have to beat that is if he can prove that the court had no jurisdiction at all to begin with.

This calls for writ of mandamus. The judge is disqualified. He has no subject matter jurisdiction,

The only time I can find where the attorney general has original jurisdiction

in a criminal accusation in Texas, when he has original prosecutorial jurisdiction,

You file it with the attorney general and he has original jurisdiction.

if PIRs come under the jurisdiction like it does in Texas of the Attorney General.

Get jurisdictionary and do it yourself.

Jurisdictionary teaches you exactly how to file and prosecute a lawsuit.

Jurisdictionary.

and we get sponsor income when people buy the jurisdictionary through us.

He's the creator of Jurisdictionary and an attorney in Florida.

I would suggest that you have in effect challenged the jurisdiction of the court

to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

Basically, it's saying that they have no jurisdiction over anybody that filed it that has a problem in court.

that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to proceed with these

and that any law enforcement agency who would apprehend someone for this also lacks subject matter jurisdiction,

I've been just kind of skating along, just not allowing the court's interim jurisdiction by showing up.

Okay, a jurisdiction will not post a warrant on a computer that's further away

If that information was never filed, the court was never granted jurisdiction.

You're talking about the court of jurisdiction.

and they've said that the magistrate has jurisdiction until time of trial

or until the case is initiated in the court of jurisdiction.

So if you go to the court of jurisdiction and look for the citation,

I couldn't find anything that gave me specific grounds for challenge jurisdiction.

You broke up a little bit. You said the challenge is jurisdiction?

but nothing specifically challenging jurisdiction in the court.

First, you have to get past subject matter jurisdiction.

You only argued that issue if you got past subject matter jurisdiction.

It's not my place to determine whether or not the petitioner has subject matter jurisdiction.

because if you didn't determine that you had subject matter jurisdiction,

No subject matter jurisdiction, no immunity from suit.

So subject matter jurisdiction falls by the wayside.

anywhere within the state, but their jurisdiction for writing citations is still limited to their own.

If the city police have a statutory jurisdiction, the sheriff doesn't have anything to say about it.

He can tell his officers what to do, but he can't tell officers from a separate jurisdiction what to do.

and that is the wonder of exclusive appellate jurisdiction.

Principle one, lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action

Because if a matter includes a federal issue, only the feds can have jurisdiction over the federal issue.

one's jurisdiction has been challenged, and he kept cutting me off left and right.

since they move forward without even removing that jurisdiction,

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.

On a motion of this nature, on a challenge to the jurisdiction, what I would maintain is that the presentment before the court is

insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

And once the court is noticed that the pleadings failed to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction,

Are you going to challenge my jurisdiction or are you going to charge me with impersonating an officer?

You've notified the judge that he has no subject matter jurisdiction.

If he attempts to continue to exercise subject matter jurisdiction,

it's my opinion that the best challenge to jurisdiction is a criminal complaint and motion to disqualify.

So I've been trying to get people to take this approach to challenges to the jurisdiction.

It's not the one that should be in a position to have to determine if the judge has jurisdiction.

You might look at preparing a countersuit and sue the judge himself, claiming he has no subject matter jurisdiction

jurisdiction to do this.

But instead of simply challenging the subject matter jurisdiction, they went after the judge

Everyone out there, please support our sponsors, HempUSA.org, Jurisdictionary.com.

this, even though they have no jurisdiction and they never have. Well, what you do is,

had no jurisdiction to proceed to begin with, the judge has committed a violation of law.

because the judge had no jurisdiction to issue it to begin with. Mandamus. Let me explain

to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court. And the court's responsible

It's unincorporated. So the JP is a judge of original jurisdiction. It went before the

thing. You have no jurisdiction, challenge the jurisdiction upfront. And they have never

proven jurisdiction. They haven't even tried. So this is a great case to go for the judge.

because it's under their jurisdiction.

then the pleadings in the case are not sufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

Well, he's exercising a jurisdiction.

My counterclaim is challenging jurisdiction.

are insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court,

It's not your place to determine whether or not the judge has subject matter jurisdiction.

He has to make sure the pleadings are sufficient to give him jurisdiction,

The people are fighting back, saying jurisdiction, travel, and abatement, I'm not a person, I'm a man,

Let's get jurisdiction area.

Okay. First thing is they have lack of subject matter jurisdiction, 201.904 Texas Transportation Code.

So if they do not file an information in your case, they do not grant jurisdiction to the court.

So that's two grounds for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

So they've got multiple issues to deal with over jurisdiction all by itself.

Does the judge have subject matter jurisdiction?

He's going to subject matter jurisdiction.

to invoke subject matter jurisdiction to the court, and subject matter jurisdiction can

Randy just said subject matter jurisdiction can always be challenged.

Rusk could have no subject matter jurisdiction

Could have no subject matter jurisdiction

That jurisdiction was in the county in Rusk

Took him to another jurisdiction to assault him

So I've written I wrote a document today that's a challenge to the jurisdiction

Like in the order I put in, it is hereby ordered that the court is without subject matter jurisdiction and the cause is dismissed.

Then he gets jurisdiction and he can hold me 90 days. And when that 90 days runs out, he can do it again and do it again as a woman in Arizona that's been in jail almost a year now.

Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience

Have you studied the jurisdiction dictionary course yet, Brian?

is special, you're granting impersonal jurisdiction, which up until that point he does not have unless

with the content. They never address the form. And as far as subject matter jurisdiction,

jurisdiction as a special appearance. If you challenge subject matter jurisdiction,

Yeah, now on subject matter jurisdiction, there's another caveat to that too. Do not argue the

directly or you are waiving the grant of subject matter jurisdiction. If you try to argue the facts

of the law you're being charged with, you are waiving subject matter jurisdiction. Do not do

Subject matter jurisdiction, if they don't have it, they never get it. Right. And nothing you can

reserve your appearance as special so you do not waive the in personum jurisdiction.

there is no subject matter jurisdiction. It's just like when they cite a person rather than a man

apple and I say, well, you don't have jurisdiction because this court only deals with oranges,

I waive then subject matter jurisdiction? No. The first thing you ask them is what

the jurisdiction? Well, that is one of the preliminary objections. If you come in on a

challenge to the jurisdiction, they don't get to go to the merits other than how they go to

subject matter jurisdiction. And generally, the merits of the case won't go to subject matter

jurisdiction. What will go to subject matter jurisdiction is where the crime was committed,

jurisdiction. And to prove up jurisdiction, they have to show that the court has jurisdiction over

the type of issue brought before them, that the particular court has venue within the jurisdiction,

that the pleadings brought before the court are sufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction

of service, the filing did not invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

And these are the things you deal with in subject matter jurisdiction. Do not let them go to the

where it is. So, what if in my first motion to challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of the

jurisdiction, then they may be addressed. Is that a tactic that's usable?

trick you past subject matter jurisdiction. When the judge asks you a question or when

granted civil jurisdiction in Texas. They are criminal only. And only if that crime is

jurisdiction, when we talk about it, you haven't heard it before and it sounds strange and

And from subject matter jurisdiction details, in each ticket, you've only got one minor

time you've appeared in court, the judge has acted without jurisdiction, which is also

Failure to do so leaves the court without jurisdiction to hear the case, because a 1.14

state of criminal procedure says an indictment or an information bestows jurisdiction upon

No information or no indictment, no jurisdiction.

jurisdiction of the offense who is in the municipality or county in which the offense

jurisdiction and had never ever had a hearing and then i went down on wednesday and supposedly

The courts in Texas have statewide jurisdiction,

a subject matter jurisdiction.

of jurisdictional boundaries,

and jurisdiction, the guy and his damn,

and that their service of process is improper and therefore they're hung because that doesn't invoke any jurisdiction and they can't prove it and you never get to the examining trial.

appearance which and you challenge jurisdiction now you're saying the citation is only in effect a promise to appear and once they appear there has to be an information or a charging instrument there's got to be something else well yeah that's a requirement simply because he's 100 percent correct

agenda 21 and for those of you who don't know why go to the website why his name is named that it's a story that I don't know yeah no okay he's calling in and I just got a text message there they're saying that they just want a case because the complaint did not meet the criteria to give jurisdiction so I want to bring Mike into the conversation here Mike hey go ahead hey Mike the camel has landed the camel has landed go ahead

and so what you want to do especially if you review your paperwork and it puts them on the dime because you just challenged jurisdiction, you haven't appeared generally,

you haven't given jurisdiction and you basically come after them with the fact that the citation is not a complaint, it is not a summons and that their process is insufficient

you've fulfilled your promise, now they have to prove their jurisdiction and they can't and they never will be able to.

Oh, well, you're right there. There's no argument on that point. They're flawed from the get-go because, one, first thing, they're issued against the party to which they do not apply. Subject matter jurisdiction is nonexistent.

It would really impair, you know, our strong point that we have currently under the law of federal jurisdiction.

Federal jurisdiction is very, very limited, and this would go against that.

I'm not sure. In my mind, I'm thinking that the higher court would take jurisdiction.

The court has power to do that to keep the lower court from interfering with the jurisdiction of the higher court.

any action in the lower court would interfere with your action and potentially make your jurisdiction moot.

Subchapter B, jurisdiction and power, Section 27.031, jurisdiction.

If it is, then the JP court has no jurisdiction according to this section.

Jurisdiction.

In addition to the jurisdiction and powers provided by the Constitution and other law, the justice court has original jurisdiction of,

and sub-bottom three, foreclosures of mortgages and enforcement of liens on personal property in cases in which the amount in controversy is otherwise within the justice court's jurisdiction.

In this case, it specifically says in sub-bottom one, civil matters in which exclusive jurisdiction is not in the district or county court and in which the amount in controversy is not more than $10,000, exclusive of interest.

The eviction is not before the, if the matter of the eviction involves an amount of money greater than $10,000, you can make the claim that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction.

Once a challenge to the jurisdiction is made, the court has to prove that it has jurisdiction.

So, and a challenge to jurisdiction can be made at any time.

So he can challenge the jurisdiction to the JP directly, and he can also be filing in the district court at the same time or previously, five minutes earlier, a restraining order against the hearing also.

But now, be aware the JP is not going to want to admit he doesn't have jurisdiction, so be prepared to have somebody stand in for that because they're going to resist that fact heartily.

He should have a challenge to jurisdiction in hand.

Challenge to jurisdiction.

If it's me in the courtroom, when the court rules summarily that it has subject matter jurisdiction, I ask the bailiff to arrest the judge.

And a challenge to the jurisdiction since it can be made at any time it gets around the seven-day notice limit.

So you file a challenge to the jurisdiction. The judge turns it down.

That moving ahead on the eviction when there's a question of jurisdiction will cause a harm that cannot be undone,

Therefore, the original pleadings are insufficient to invoke subject matter jurisdiction in the court.

We want to keep looking for things that go to subject matter jurisdiction.

Is there anything in the pleadings or in the procedures that might go to subject matter jurisdiction?

If he doesn't have anything signed by the creditor, he has no standing to bring an issue before the court, goes to subject matter jurisdiction.

This goes to standing. You challenge subject matter jurisdiction of the court,

So you prepare a challenge to the jurisdiction. That's a Rule 12 challenge.

You move to disqualify the court. You move the court to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

That goes to subject matter jurisdiction. It can be brought at any time.

So, learned counsel is going to understand subject matter jurisdiction.

Right, we were talking about subject matter jurisdiction. The petitioner has to have standing.

If he doesn't have standing, then he cannot invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.

Well, when it goes to subject matter jurisdiction, you remind him that absent subject matter jurisdiction,

Yes, and insufficient service goes to subject matter jurisdiction. Steve, you there?

Insufficient. Now you make a challenge – that's another element in your challenge to the jurisdiction.

Then maybe they have some special federal jurisdiction

The feds always want to take the jurisdiction because of the Randy Weaver case

And so that's therefore that's why the fed had jurisdiction in this case even though all the marijuana was grown inside California for one thing and for another thing it wasn't even commerce because the people that are growing it under state law have to donate it to the medical marijuana clinic.

Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand 4 CD course that will show you how in 24 hours step by step.

Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.

When you file any motions, are you giving them jurisdiction so I can't challenge jurisdiction?

Challenge jurisdiction first thing.

Once you've challenged jurisdiction, the thing about jurisdiction, you cannot give the judge subject matter jurisdiction.

You can give, you can waive in personum jurisdiction.

But if you go before the court at arm's length, telling them that they don't have jurisdiction,

but you're coming before them at arm's length to ensure your rights until a determination of subject matter jurisdiction is made,

you do not give them, you don't waive in personum jurisdiction.

Subject matter jurisdiction, you cannot give them, period.

I have to have subject matter jurisdiction as a matter of law.

So all these guys say you're going to give them jurisdiction, not true.

You challenge jurisdiction first thing.

Now, you can challenge jurisdiction, do an abatement, and raise all kinds of other issues in the original pleading.

And it doesn't matter where inside that pleading a challenge to jurisdiction comes.

if I go through this gate, am I giving you jurisdiction?

And also, I filed a pretty lengthy motion to dismiss election jurisdiction and all that.

The document is called The Secret of Special Maritime Jurisdiction as the PDF file.

challenges to jurisdiction and criminal charges against them

Now, my question is whether or not the maritime jurisdiction actually applies.

Wendy, I need to ask you something. What, I don't understand the purpose or the point or even the jurisdiction for that matter of turning yourself into Roanoke County if the warrant for your arrest is in Cherokee County. That doesn't make any sense to me.

When he sits as a magistrate has statewide jurisdiction.

And he warns me that this guy is really bad news. Well, so you're saying that the municipal police from Cherokee County plan on going to Roanoke County outside their jurisdiction to arrest you on a warrant for which you've already turned yourself in for and for which you've already had an examining trial?

And this is how venue works. The courts have jurisdiction.

Like a district court has jurisdiction within the limits of its district. And say a Justice of the Peace, he has jurisdiction within the county, but he only has venue within the limits of the precinct in which he has been elected.

So Justice of the Peace 1 has countywide jurisdiction, but only venue in precinct 1.

So in order for me to establish venue, I have to be able to establish that some part of a crime I'm alleging occurred in the jurisdiction that I'm alleging has venue.

How do I get into the maritime jurisdiction?

The way I read maritime jurisdiction,

or even the grand jury subject matter jurisdiction.

And as to a demurrer, a demurrer is a challenge to the jurisdiction.

Refresh me on why you would file a challenge to the jurisdiction.

Okay, then, yeah, a challenge to the jurisdiction would – I don't know if you can do that.

They just always tell me to file a challenge to the jurisdiction.

the prosecution has jurisdiction unless they screwed up a point of due process.

Challenge to the jurisdiction if you can find one.

And the way to look for a challenge to the jurisdiction,

you challenge jurisdiction, move to question indictment.

Wonderful. So that's a challenge you can make to the jurisdiction.

And I said, well, this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction in this issue.

and then they started this argument about jurisdiction,

and I'm insisting that the city doesn't have jurisdiction in the county courthouse,

If I can make that connection and show absolutely that there is Maritime jurisdiction.

The jurisdiction matters there, but maybe other people could articulate it better.

What I did think of reading in the Cornell write-up is part of what the jurisdiction issue was that I had called in about a week or so ago

on the Senate bill that isn't in the House yet for the jurisdiction matter regarding federal jurisdiction

Any drain, any stream, any creek, anything that eventually reaches the U.S. waters, the federal government is claiming jurisdiction over it.

Right, well, they might be trying to get around territorial jurisdiction by saying that they have some type of international precedence.

and the Feds have jurisdiction because no individual state can move out into the territorial waters.

And what they're trying to say is, is anything that runs into that, they have jurisdiction over.

because that has been a lot of times given up to the federal jurisdictions and as it's going right now.

And I don't know if that's right about the Senate bill that's up right now that I called in about last week regarding jurisdiction.

kind of like how the jurisdiction from other states to other states being foreign corporations are dealt with in the corporations.

And recently I got a page on jurisdiction.

This is a whole page on jurisdiction.

In any of your opinions, do I necessarily have to waive or have to have waived personam jurisdiction simply by letting the court know my name upon presence?

Now, unless you make a challenge that the court doesn't have personam jurisdiction because of the nature of your name, if you're making that argument, this may have relevance.

In personam jurisdiction, I have to go to the nature of how you're claiming in personam jurisdiction.

The court first has to have subject matter jurisdiction or jurisdiction within the territory, within the region, and now he has to have jurisdiction over you as the person.

That part's clear in law, and that's the non-sprotunque, and in personam jurisdiction to a large degree goes to a non-sprotunque in the proper venue or in an inconvenient venue.

If you live in a given county and there is a justice of the peace in that county, the justice of the peace has subject matter jurisdiction over class C misdemeanors.

However, if you don't live in his precinct, he doesn't have in personam jurisdiction over you, or even if you do live in his precinct, he has to be able to apply the law to you personally.

But if you go in there and accept that name spelled that way, even if they really meant someone else, then yes, you've given them in personam jurisdiction over yourself.

Yeah, in personam jurisdiction can be waived, so it's really important that you understand how the court gets in personam jurisdiction over you.

So, they never invoked the subject matter jurisdiction of the court and it wasn't your

Reason being, it's the judge exercised jurisdiction.

matter jurisdiction of the court.

Well that's okay. Anyway, for those who are not familiar with New Hilda State, it's Admiralty jurisdiction.

So you can claim Admiralty jurisdiction in your pleadings, which is what I did in my criminal complaint.

Wait, stop. How do I get Admiralty jurisdiction out of the air and down on the ground?

But at any rate, you establish the jurisdiction of the court by the sufficiency of your pleadings.

Now, I understand once I'm in maritime law that I can do lots of things and I can claim maritime jurisdiction.

But maritime jurisdiction only exists if it exists as a matter of law.

It took standing to invoke the jurisdiction.

So how do I invoke the maritime jurisdiction and pull it off the water or down from the air, down to the ground where the statutes normally live?

Yeah. But what also makes sense to me is you establish jurisdiction.

You invoke the jurisdiction of the court by the sufficiency of your plea. So if you claim maritime jurisdiction and you.

Yeah. Well, see, the problem with that is, is I can stand in Texas and claim Oklahoma jurisdiction all I want to.

But Oklahoma will never have jurisdiction in Texas because it doesn't buy law.

And the fact that I file a pleading that has the appearance of invoking maritime jurisdiction.

Maritime jurisdiction by law has to apply to the place I'm invoking it or it doesn't make any difference.

Well, that's what I was saying a while ago about the jurisdiction area stuff. If you study that and do your own reading and research, you'll know as much as 80 to 90 percent of these guys do because they certainly don't spend any time reading.

They were prosecuting my son with no jurisdiction.

No jurisdiction, no immunity of any kind.

The prosecutor came in court and said, we don't have any jurisdiction, Judge.

If you plead that the city is without subject matter jurisdiction for whatever reason it is,

So make absolutely sure you plead out your jurisdiction first.

$75,000 doesn't necessarily put it in the federal jurisdiction.

You have to have diversity of jurisdiction.

To federal jurisdiction, you have to be $75,000 controversy.

I was wondering if they could move to dismiss for like a subject matter jurisdiction.

We were on jurisdictional issues.

It actually says from magistrate court, but environmental court falls under that jurisdiction.

And we also tried to challenge subject matter jurisdiction.

The judge refused to hear that, said she had all absolute jurisdiction over the case.

And I told him the first thing to do is plead no subject matter jurisdiction.

that judge's staff for moving a case out of a court that didn't have jurisdiction.

And then we got into this little give and take about the local police not having subject matter jurisdiction within a county building.

Okay. All right. Well, that makes sense. I had a question for you, Eddie. I just, just the jurisdictionary court, I haven't gotten it yet, but I heard you say that you've actually used it.

It teaches you about discovery and so on and so forth. And the way I've heard it put is that for every one hour of the 24 hours you spend studying the jurisdictionary course,

Oh, you don't have to worry about that. I don't feel that way at all. I actually use what's in the jurisdictionary all the time.

that's all about jurisdictionary. That's the basics that you need to understand what's going on.

I said, wait a minute. Have you got the jurisdictionary courts? Oh, yeah. Yeah, I got that one all through.

No wonder, because with him, I was able to step up to another level. I didn't have to do all the really basic stuff. The jurisdictionary brought him a step that was way up there.

I just want to say the reason why I ask if any of your techniques might be found in the Texas jurisdiction is because I actually asked that question

So, I mean, when I, you know, when you step into that jurisdiction, it's a whole nother ballgame

And, I mean, it's, you can't even, I can't even begin to question the jurisdiction.

As soon as I started to raise issues of subject matter jurisdiction

and impersonal jurisdiction, he just kept threatening me.

And I just kept objecting and I said that we need to establish subject matter jurisdiction.

We need to establish what exactly the jurisdiction of the court is.

About halfway through my demur, asking the questions of jurisdiction and what have you,

the laws of the Commonwealth under statutory jurisdiction.

Whichever one has original subject matter jurisdiction in this level of office.

In this case in Pennsylvania, you go in and file with the prosecuting attorney of original jurisdiction.

If you're close to what that writ is, and the writ starts out with a statement invoking the jurisdiction of the court

Actually, I had a question back to the subject matter jurisdiction.

When you're challenging that subject matter jurisdiction

I'm not even going to talk to this guy until he shows me that he has jurisdiction,

until he establishes that he has subject matter jurisdiction.

Until he attempts to exercise the jurisdiction he didn't have,

He knows he's subject to criminal prosecution for acting without subject matter jurisdiction.

This jurisdiction needs to be challenged at the first instance so you will tend not to be enmeshed in a trial.

What happened to the other gentleman that challenged the jurisdiction of the court?

And because he never let them get past subject matter jurisdiction.

And you, it's not a good idea to say you don't have jurisdiction to walk out on the court.

So once he moves past subject matter jurisdiction, you object to everything.

I would like just a final word on subject matter jurisdiction.

The thing we really wanted to address today was how the courts hoodwink you into falling into their jurisdiction.

When a court tries to do anything that doesn't address subject matter jurisdiction, I object.

jurisdiction over me?

If a jurisdiction attempts to on a consistent basis exercising an authority, they are not

of jurisdiction.

If they're acting outside of jurisdiction, they have a severe procedural problem.

Because unless they have jurisdiction, they can yell, scream, holler, point fingers and

We're not within their jurisdiction.

Well what do we do when they attempt to apply a jurisdiction to us that they don't have?

to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction to be filed, which I am also going to integrate

they are acting without jurisdiction in the matter.

Okay, what if, what happens when you file the challenge to subject matter jurisdiction

matter jurisdiction, what then is the remedy?

of jurisdiction for which he has been challenged.

Only a separate magistrate may make the ruling on jurisdiction.

The judge that is being challenged for jurisdiction cannot render a decision on that subject,

I thought a judge could and had a duty to sit for jurisdiction, not disqualification.

For recuse, yes, but now I've got Texas cases that show that when jurisdiction and Supreme

Court cases, in fact, when jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven and it must