Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

And the dreadful thing with the vote fraud stuff

Okay we haven't gotten back to the vote fraud stuff

And it's securities fraud and that's a RICO action

And it's titled Action on Fraudulent Lien or Action on Fraudulent Lien on Property. And you have to do a little reading and there's a template and you fill it out and go before a judge.

And I think the wording is failure to remove a fraudulent lien. That's what they're charged with, or the penal code violation, I believe it is.

Okay, okay. Well, so anyway, it's a state court issue. I get an order saying that liens are fraudulent. Then the judge that signed it gets pressured. She vacates.

But let me just say this. The original order sign saying the notices of lien were fraudulent are still in the record. And there has been nothing filed subsequent to that saying the orders are not valid anyway.

And so this is starting to expose the fraud game of the paper system that sets the spot price.

and counts nine through 20 are mail fraud.

and so he wasn't committing mail fraud

constitutional. It's a fraud on the public. It's an unsustainable system. That's not an opinion.

Someone say, like one of these bankers who was committing fraud, someone comes in and

enter into, then that's fraud.

It's fraud.

that's fraud and it's fraud by not by non-disclosure

the facts to you it's it's not perjury it's fraud. Oh boy. Which goes to

them in some kind of fraud issue. Could you go back and sue the original credit

fact even the Supreme Court because title 18 is a fraud on his face you see

attorney with mail fraud, and if, okay, now how do we know that the district attorney

so I think if you were to look at everything there's clearly no attempt to defraud anybody

that I'm actually trying to defraud the public and representing myself as being an MD

and I'm certain there will be case law stating that where clerical errors are not there will have to be a showing of intent to defraud

have they filed a criminal complaint against you for intent to defraud

This one walks out of her door one day three years later and the police are waiting for and throw her in jail and cost her some 30 grand in bond to get out for felony fraud.

It's all coming down from the UN and upper levels of government controlling the county commissioners and the state legislatures and the fraud of sustainable development and the fraud of global warming.

but a fraud.

fraudulent use

it's using it fraudulently.

to fraudulent use. Yeah, but

you didn't finish reading the statute on fraudulent

Now, I think it does go to fraud, but

behind the curtain. It's a fraud.

over election fraud and all these kinds of things

And electionfraudnews.com has a lot of information on that too,

an alleged multi-million dollar fraud on the London stock market.

Federal investigators said they stole millions of dollars all in a web of deceit and fraud.

Investigators laid out a scheme of fraud and deceit that they said made the judges 2.6 million.

scheme to defraud the public out of honest services that were expected of them, said

good faith services fraud

oh here it is honest services fraud

and you have a right to honest services if they defraud you

honest services fraud to comply with

public officials for honest services fraud

rather than straight fraud

fraud will scare the bejesus out of all of them

On a service fraud?

And it's in the joint counts they in the thumbstead with counts founded on fraud and

Was fraud committed on the part

The lenders committed fraud

Committed fraud in getting you to

It could be outright fraud or it could be

Constructive fraud, in which case

they went down and filed with the court indicating that they thought that the attorney had committed fraud

And this was only because of the threat of the 202 against the attorney for fraud.

The Securities and Exchange Commission Tuesday charged Stanford with an $8 billion fraud.

of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for committing fraud, for conspiracy, and a whole

federal rules of procedure. They committed fraud on the record. I appealed the case and

It's just a way of ensuring against fraudulent documents.

and we filed a lawsuit against JP Morgan and another company and we've claimed fraud and we're going to force them to produce the original promissory note

Wealthy depositors were turned away Thursday from fraudulent financier Alan Stanford's

Texas financier Alan Stanford, accused of a $9.2 billion fraud that affected people

It's a fraud, isn't it?

I'm wondering about reopening a case where a judge committed an act of fraud

I want to file maybe a fraud on the court.

The court committed an act of fraud.

I have to threaten him in open court with his act of fraud.

If you accuse him of fraud, he cannot preside over the case, period.

So you accuse him of fraud, prepare a criminal complaint, and file it.

It's the biggest fraud that is going on in America right now,

Sure. Well, foreclosures are almost always fraudulent.

And many of these banks sell these notes as many as 30 times fraudulently and get paid for these.

is the countries that were buying these fraudulent securities figured out what was going on and demanded payment.

And almost every single foreclosure is fraudulent.

He was fraudulently allowed the custody to sell, even though he testified in federal court under oath

The dismissed charges, there was no evidence because they were fraudulent.

because they're going to violate the law because they're operating the fraud we proved.

They're committing fraud.

So the sale was an illegal sale and done in fraud,

So if you want to prove a fraud, you better have the documents that go along with the fraud.

And that would also go to fraud.

It would seem that estoppel of that nature would go to fraud.

Okay, so even if them not telling you didn't amount to fraud,

and stated something that was false, they committed fraud upon the court.

it's also a cause of action independently for the fraud, for the damage done by that fraud.

because of that fraud.

You can't commit fraud upon the court.

now. He should sue the city of Austin for fraud by non-disclosure.

That's fraud by non-disclosure, that's a cause of action

That's official oppression. It may be more than that. It may be fraud.

And the problem is, is the judge has threatened you and tried to coerce money out of you. The fact that he may not realize that there's a problem is irrelevant. It's irrelevant to culpability. Charge him with fraud.

No, you don't have to show up. Just mail it in. You file fraud with the district attorney and file a motion to disqualify the judge in the court.

with Russell in Texas and Tony Davis, also here in Texas, about the mortgage scam, fraud,

in as fraud.

Yeah, it's fraud or breach of contract.

Yes, breach of contract by fraud.

And this will show deliberate fraud because they do it to everybody.

Okay, well then the other alternative they could do is they could file a fraud claim

Russell and Tony are here with us talking about mortgage fraud.

We are here with Tony Davis and Russell from Texas talking about mortgage fraud and what

What they should have done then is to go after them for fraud.

in triplicate and challenge them for abdication of the contract by fraud.

be no need to bail these mortgage companies out and you just nail them for fraud.

And if you think about it, it's all fraudulent anyway when you consider that even your hometown

This is all fraudulent debt.

All right, Mr. Big Stuff, Mr. Big Banks, Mr. Fraudulent Mortgages.

Civil complaint, and the cause of action was fraud.

going to prove that they committed fraud.

If they set off the account, then that's essentially stipulating that the lawsuit for fraud was

since he sued for fraud, they should be able to work this out, but you also may consider

fraud thing.

Now that was what I wanted to suggest is if it's fraud, then you go for pecuniary damage.

fraud by doing that, so we're getting ready to go after them for that.

against it, all based on fraud.

they can show you all the fraud that the agent perpetrated.

Committing this fraud and go after the agent,

That's fraud on its face.

you can sue them for a contractual violation like fraud, fraud per se, fraud by non-disclosure.

others were involved in his $65 billion fraud.

If we do that, we can fraud against the consumer.

tax fraud.

But just essentially voter ID is, they're basing it on voter fraud

But voter fraud is a fraud and it's a distraction away from the real fraud

So this all goes to fraud

That would be fraud

to look at the lender as a thief and a fraud when they're unable to pay their bill. So

with us, and he did a show on fraud and this sort of topic. So I would like to bring Steve

Yes. Gary, I've been studying fraud and studying mortgage issues for a good while, and I've

invested in the loan. So therefore, there is fraud right there. You find-

Right now we are talking about mortgage and fraud, mortgage fraud

We've got Steve Skidmore on the line from Endless Fraud Detection

Your client from the fraud that's been perpetuated on them, I'm just wondering

Not because you owe or don't owe, it's because they're fraudulent

And if you allow them to defraud you, they're going to defraud your children as well

Have you got common law fraud, fraud pro se?

They defrauded you on your contract.

Fraud by nondisclosure, common law fraud, statutory fraud, you got false imprisonment.

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, where's the fraud?

you'll see fraud, mistake, inadvertence of mind, misplaced confidence.

You've got another issue also and that's the issue related to fraud

because if there's not, the tax lien is totally fraudulent.

Whoever the other name is on there, you need to charge that person with fraud.

because they know full well it's fraud from its inception.

Strategy is fraud, total fraud.

It's titled Three Shoes Posse Exposes IRS Fraud, all right?

then it appears to be a total fraud.

A public servant commits an offense if, with intent to obtain a benefit or with intent to harm or defraud another,

And Janet yeah I mean you're right of course I know all about the fraudulent elections

don't know how fraudulent the voting system is.

we really don't elect anybody anymore because the voting systems are completely fraudulent.

You know, the thing is, I think one of the biggest frauds the state puts on the people is forcing people to get their cars inspected,

and that's why they force us to register and all that. Isn't that fraud?

Yeah, it would be fraud because you consider that when the manufacturer's certificate of origin is handed out from the dealer,

Then the one, I was looking for the Patsy. So the Patsy would be the person you buy from for fraud.

Yeah, because he committed fraud by sending your title to someone else without your consent.

Goes to fraud.

Randy says, to fraud, unjust taxation and so on and so forth.

we can actually show who we're going to bury these people for massive, massive fraud against

of a doubt that we are being victimized by a massive money collection fraud.

You can charge him with making a fraudulent criminal charge

Knowing full well that was a fraudulent charge to pull you over on

Then there's his grounds for pulling him over and they were fraudulent

is getting the attorney general to look at some of the fraud

and we'd be happy to comply provided they haven't committed fraud on the court

It's fraud on the court.

fraud in the circuit court. And the very first thing they did was remove it.

to defraud you, right?

I would claim fraud by the mortgage company.

I would claim fraud and maybe several other things

like a federal court, and you allege fraud,

you can prove that fraud.

We want to prove they're committing fraud

that they were engaged in fraudulent proceedings.

Okay, and then we claim fraud on its face because they can't produce the original note.

and we're claiming fraud. You know, you could claim RICO, but RICO is a little more tricky, okay?

a fraud and inducement, no standing and damages and injunctive relief.

And if the mortgage company defrauded you in some way,

it's in the public interest that the court find the fraud and rule in your favor.

fraud fraud involved in the deal by the mortgage company or by its assignees and

so and when it goes to fraud fraud vitiates the entire process that is

is that the fraud voids the note and entitles you to pure title to the

company based on elements of fraud violations of Fair Debt Collection

committing complete and total fraud complete and total usury they monetize

utter fraud that's just the way it is and we're going to do something about it

like you were saying just a second ago they committed fraud absolutely okay now

them locked up but if they commit fraud under a maritime you can have them

know there is a civil process when someone commits fraud they also if you're

damaged by the fraud they commit a civil tort against you which you can pursue

claiming that that person is defrauding the government by taking money with no

We have and, you know, the elections, there is always going to be fraud, there is always

We shouldn't really predetermine whether that's fraud or not.

We should let a grand jury determine whether that's fraud or not.

If I go after these examiners for defrauding the Secretary of State by recommending machines

that they absolutely knew did not come up to the requirements of the code, that's fraud.

So I would go after the examiners and accuse them of fraud, accusing them of accepting

their pay under fraudulent circumstances.

In fraud and malicious prosecution

It appears to me I should sue the dealer for fraud.

That's a fraud to me.

So the bank has a lien. I have full ownership. This sounds like fraud.

and they should have been able to transfer it directly to you, but they got defrauded just as you did.

As we said in the last review of this, if you've gotten a ticket from a police officer for speeding and you were not in one of those specific motor vehicles, then the officer has committed fraud.

But it also would go in with a clear and present criminal complaint against the police officer for basically committing fraud and aggravated perjury.

Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.

There are those who claim that if you fail to respond, they will send you a document and demand that you respond and say that failure to respond is fraud.

Okay. And I was in the Medicaid fraud unit. And my specialty was going after doctors.

fraud cases. You know-

So it doesn't matter how long it's occurred, if it was fraudulent to begin with, it was null and void at the beginning

Why does nobody charge the agent with fraud?

That's tampering with a government document and that's filing a fraudulent, what's the term?

The document is fraudulent if they can't establish what's on the document.

Well, can't you at most any time go back to the original fraud?

Why hasn't all that been declared fraud from years ago?

and he's managed to sue them for fraud.

And it looks like he's not only able to stop this fraudulent foreclosure,

If the bank committed fraud, just sue them after the fact for all the payments you made.

So that's fraudulent. That's filed on the fraudulent document.

she should be charged with about three or four million counts of fraud.

and she did nothing to stop them from using her name, she should be charged with fraud.

They like to charge everybody else with fraud,

but they sure as hell won't charge themselves with fraud

We're the ones that need to charge them with fraud.

Are before the court as a result of fraud and violation of due process

Okay, and I'm okay with that, what he didn't do is make any attempt to communicate with me, but filed in public record in the court documents that he asked me A, B, and C, and didn't open his mouth, so he's filing fraudulent documents, isn't he?

Yes, fraud is fraud. You don't have to be in any special position to challenge these guys.

To challenge these guys for fraud.

Yes, they're committing fraud.

They're committing fraud.

They don't want you to know what they've really done with the real note because it's fraud, okay?

He is suing to have the mortgage discharged because it was fraud on its face to begin with

and on top of that get a whole bunch of money back from the bank for fraud.

Their third concern is mortgage fraud.

That's the key because we're only going to get our salary back until we have total control of our property, man. We've got to get these clowns away from our homes, man, and quit stealing them with this fraudulent administrative crap that does not apply to us in the place we eat, sleep, and do all these other things that make no commercial money at.

to this bill okay the hand counted paper ballots if it can be shown that there was fraudulent

submitted fraudulent and if these counties and or the secretary of state submitted fraudulent

hey everyone hi Governor Randy, Randy on the election fraud and the budget issues and looking at tampering with a governmental record

okay here's some thought can I a couple of thoughts because the burden really is to prove intent on any fraud case

and it won't have the political impact that a charge of fraud and felony tampering with a government document would have

get their license you get them on a civil fraud charge alright and in the case in the arena I was working in

If it costs the taxpayers more money then they've breached their fiduciary responsibility in addition to their oath and is there a way to tie that to a criminal breach versus trying to go after the fraud?

50,000 or maybe even low on that number and he could see where fraud was committed not

did you say it represents a fraud you know fraud basically or how did you put it?

And when you look at causes of action one good cause of action is fraud by non-disclosure

deliberate fraud.

Well the IRS of course is the biggest fraud you know around

that I had the right to see to her bond and press charges against her for fraud.

In this case, what he's talking about would quite probably fall under the statute of frauds,

and depending upon the severity of the fraud, may have up to five years to go after them

The rule of law, Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens talking about fiat currencies, bank fraud and this bill.

This law that's been passed to fund the FBI and apparently the Department of Justice to go after banking fraud and how it looks like.

If you read down in the bill, if you participate in the banking system at all, you're guilty of fraud too, knowingly or unknowingly, whether you know it's a fraud or not.

I mean, it is the most evil and fraudulent scam in the history of the world, this paper currency system.

It is the biggest, most evil and fraudulent thing imaginable.

It's still their number one funded search activity, but number three on the list is fraud.

And now they've just got well-funded for fraud, so it may move up the list.

Well, see, that doesn't make any sense because what you're saying is that if one of these agents has knowledge of a fraud crime,

So criminal complaints of fraud to the feds should be done as a matter of course.

to see if you can find fraud in it, take it to the feds.

knowingly presents or causes to be presented a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval.

that could cause blowback, as Ron Paul would say, because if these banks are engaging in fraud

and the accounts themselves are fraudulent accounts and we're writing checks off of them

or using our debit cards on these accounts, that means we're committing fraud too.

Yeah, they could come back after us for committing fraud because we're using these bank accounts

The language is not very clear. False or fraudulent claim.

Yeah. Well, I mean the thing is all accounts are fraudulent.

I mean the banks are committing fraud all the time, everything they do, so it really doesn't matter.

that by constitutional mandate we're allowed to use, we are engaged in fraud

Is it not fraud to use someone's private property or profit without their consent?

How do we get to your signature being used by the bank for fraud?

Yeah, but see, here's the fraud.

Wait, do we have case law establishing that that is fraud or is this just our conclusions?

Isn't it fraud to loan a debt?

If it's a voluntary assumption of the debt, it's not fraud.

If they disclose to you that you're inheriting a debt with this exchange and you say, okay, that's not fraud.

And in that case, it is fraud because you are never given the full terms of the contract you are signing.

So you're saying by granting that authority, you participate in the fraud.

Well, same thing as any contract, like Randy would say, you got to go after them for a fraudulent contract, breach of contract.

Fraud and non-disclosure, that's cause of action, but it's also a crime.

Well, yeah, Randy, but I mean it's possible now to prosecute somebody for an act of fraud, but you still don't see it going on.

The Fraud Enforcement Recovery Act 2009, they just funded the feds to go after essentially banking fraud, financial industry fraud.

But in any case, they have funded the feds to go after fraud,

I've never even seen a case tried as far as going after the financial institution for that fraud on the back of that car.

For a criminal fraud.

when they're talking about if a person knowingly presents or causes to be prevented a fraudulent claim for payment or approval, I thought 1099-OID.

What I'm afraid of is that the feds will use this to claim that that filing is fraudulent.

Well, what I'm afraid of is that they're going to claim everything we do is fraudulent, even writing a check or using our bank account.

I agree. With this, they can essentially claim, they can just claim something is fraudulent.

If we participate in the banking system at all, that we're committing fraud also.

Just even using our bank account, they could claim it's fraud.

existence because it was an act of fraud. And this is a lot of guys get out by

state. Correct. Unless you're a fraud and what you manufacture doesn't really exist.

Reserve charging interest on it to begin with. That's why I said when they do this fraud act

There's never any victim in most crimes and that's a fraud that they're committing on

cannot apply to, that is a fraudulent act.

then I committed fraud in what I told you, especially if I collected money from you to

lacks full disclosure and if it was in a contract situation it would be fraud by

as a Medicaid fraud investigator, criminal investigator,

dealing with health care fraud, money laundering, that type of thing.

In the Medicaid fraud unit, in our unit, we would get complaints from all manner and means and sources.

and we are directly listed, the Medicaid fraud units are directly listed as having an exception.

As a Medicaid fraud investigator, I actually could walk into, by administrative law,

When someone signs up to be a Medicaid provider, they agree that if a Medicaid, someone from the attorney general's Medicaid fraud unit,

that was used for credit card fraud in Nigeria.

To start going after these frauds

So all you are is defrauded by these people

Yeah, and it's total fraud because you can't loan something that you never had to begin with, so they're lying

There's an element of fraud in this because they're not telling you the truth

Lack of full disclosure, fraud by non-disclosure

So that means they're totally committing fraud

Which is a fantastic documentary on the whole banking system fraud from beginning to end

of fraud.

What really happened because it's total fraud, total inside job.

the official story is a fraud.

We had won national acclaim award for our work in fraud detection.

What drove me into Medicaid fraud was it allowed me to get into a field I had interest in,

And a lot of the doctors and a lot of the people who are out committing fraud

a single provider case, was 8 million in Medicaid fraud over 36 months.

that's another 8 million dollars in fraud that you and I and everyone else have paid for.

investigates Medicare fraud.

Well, that's fraud by non-disclosure. If he told me he'd sell me this bag of stuff and it turned out not to be dope, but it turned out to be oregano, making that allegation that he sold me a bag of oregano instead of dope is not a cause of action.

However, if I said he defrauded me by non-disclosure, fraud by non-disclosure is a cause of action and it has certain elements, just like a crime is defined by a penal statute and it has certain elements.

It's just basically another song that we wrote trying to expose the fraud of the Federal Reserve.

voting system is complete fraud, and it has been a complete fraud for the last 20 years

level of the fraud of the voting system, and so they still are going to respond to our

is the elections are fraud, so that's my take on it.

fraud.

Since the wife originally married him under fraudulent pretenses,

why doesn't he file a tort action against her for fraud?

It's a predictive contract, fraud.

then that's fraud.

I mean, not that I'm into pollution or anything, but this is a fraud.

It's a total fraud.

All of this is a fraud. It's a total fraud.

Yeah, not to mention outright fraud.

And for a judge to accept that, that's acting in concert and collusion with the fraud.

And so that's how they, you know, schmooze by and totally defraud us and poison us, all right, by putting toxic waste in the water,

because instead of just, you know, dumping it in the water, they sell it to the taxpayers to dump in the water, and I'm sorry, that is fraud on its face, all right?

What that sounds like is conspiracy between the DPS and this private company to defraud the public.

our elections and what is going on in the complete and utter and total fraud. Even the state

utter fraud. Our elections are a complete and total sham period. It's been that way for a long

Thursday, the case as one of the largest alleged financial frauds in U.S. history after the

Global warming is nothing but a fraud in order for the globalists for the UN to impose a global tax on the air that we breathe and try to tax and control every little tiny thing that we do

Because of this fraud of global warming okay a few days later the White House released some press release

Well they probably went they probably didn't get thrown in jail for filing UCC-1 form in and of itself okay but what they probably got thrown in jail from is doing something fraudulent with it okay and that may be but I've tried to stay away from and maybe I'm wrong in doing it but I need to do some more research in it

He was a host on WTPRN, the show Endless Fraud Detection.

inside job, a total fraud, a total false flag op, and a psychological op on top of that,

I think we could go to fraud or misuse of funds.

The only thing I filed with them was a notice of fraud,

Otherwise, they don't have that fraud.

But you see, they're often doing a little fraud against any state of Texas

They would be fraud.

We're just fighting a mortgage company over fraud.

The fraud issue is in the district court now?

happen is to fraud and corruption yes well Texas this entire state 99.6 right

that to do that in the statutory realm would be fraud the only place you can do

When you plead a counter complaint, when you have all the discoveries on you proving the fraud,

if there was fraud on the court or if there was no plaintiff with no standing,

all fraud within a criminal complaint against a criminal action against the solver.

If I catch a lawyer doing that, he gets a bar grievance, and he gets a motion for sanctions and fraud on the court.

diagnosed this sort of systemic attempt to defraud the people of a correct trial

or that's prima facie evidence of fraud.

Actual fraudulent judgment lien.

Oh, but see, if he's been harmed financially by a false lien, that's fraud.

which actually was a fraud.

Where do we find the weak places in the chain that would go to fraud and deception?

but I also have filed a fraud suit against the judge up in Marin in his private capacity

at these issues, and the FBI is adding an extra agent to take complaints about fraud

to the feds to go after financial fraud?

The Financial Fraud and Restitution Act is kind of new, but it is something that people

me there's not a single mortgage out there that's not fraud. If you have a mortgage,

don't get it right, if they make certain errors, especially if they overcharge, that's fraud.

For fraud, you can sue for the loss, plus you can sue for punitive. Since fraud goes

for fraud. Anybody out there who has a mortgage and you're paying a lot of money to these

analysis and either file suit against the mortgage company for fraud or take it to the

fraud for charging you too much money. The one I looked at, the mortgage, the interest

tremendous amount of money that the person's being defrauded out of. Also, this particular

That would seem grounds for suit for fraud.

that you've been defrauded, you've been lied to, you've been stolen from, and it is an

So that goes to fraud by deception, fraud by nondisclosure.

That's fraud by non-disclosure.

You will find fraud on top of fraud on top of fraud.

Every one of them is fraud.

Yeah, you have a cause of action for fraud.

We have Steve Skidmore on the line from Endless Fraud Detection.

Same with Plug, EndlessFraudDetection.com.

all of the forensic analysis from the perspective of finding the fraud, the overcharges, all

to have abided by and didn't, so that we can go back after them with a fraud suit.

It's Steve Skidmore, Endless Fraud Detection.

Well, I'm beating iron slings, mortgage fraud, foreclosures.

We give them our consent to defraud us, to elect over us, and we give them this consent

If that is bogus, if it's void, then would that go to securities fraud?

I've got bar complaints in on the attorneys for a fraud on the court, void judgments in this action

Can I get him for mail fraud also?

then you can also probably show conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

Yeah, that's fraud.

I understand that, Eddie. I understand that. It was fraudulent. In other words, the way that they –

I agree. I agree. But the thing is, is you voluntarily did it. Therefore, it's not fraudulent.

Then it's fraud.

That just goes to fraud.

even been discussed by the prosecutor so I knew that there was fraud going on

fifty million dollars for court transcripts fraud and all the stuff that

but once they get that revocation of power of attorney and notice of fraud,

She's calling fraud on us.

Is that considered mail fraud?

Would it be fraud if they weren't aware, if you haven't noticed them?

then it's not fraud because it's by cast of consent.

Well, tell them that their contracts are fraud also without full disclosure.

They've taken your name and they've bonded it for their profit, and they're doing that fraudulently without full disclosure.

with the notice of fraud and then the notice to cease and desist and that has been like

it but they're still proliferating the fraud any way you look at it.

Now, what would be their remedy then to try to continue on with the fraudulent system?

And the mortgage is fraud?

So HUD has been paying these mortgages, paying insurance on these foreclosures, and the mortgages are fraud to start with?

And so how they would want me to pay with is something but similar to those, and I explained that it was extortion, it was threats, and there was obviously fraud.

I know that for a motion to overturn, you know, the judgment, there has to be fraud.

friend of Steve Skidmore, by the way of Endless Fraud Detection, he had a show on WTPRN, and

their show concerning the banking system and the fraud that the banks commit all the time.

This is fraud.

This is fraud.

at 10 to midnight here on ruleoflawradio.com with the endless fraud detection.

you can't just go fraudulently sending notices to people saying you owe me $100,000,

Okay. That's fraud. I mean, you can't just send somebody a letter and say they owe you money.

He fraudulently collected funds from the state coffers and the wife helped him launder those funds.

She benefited from the fraud.

that was Steve Skidmore and Neil Switkowski of Endless Fraud Detection.

They're going to be talking about commercial law, the fraud of the banking system and all

and fraud.

Fraud carries a statute of limitations of five years in the state of Texas.

From the date that the fraud is discovered.

that's a huge fraud upon the court.

If he violates the oath, I'll go for him for repudiation of the contract and fraud.

which created the constitution, his paycheck, that he received that in fraud.

Oh, I see, mail fraud.

Mail fraud.

Actually, if I can interject, it's not mail fraud.

To go after financial frauds, I know he doesn't go to hear them, but it's politically sensitive

else's unalienable rights, damage their property or use fraud or mischief in your contracts.

which is physically threatened one while displaying a deadly weapon, fraud, enter one into contract

And if there is no assessment, the agents without subject matter jurisdiction and committing fraud,

file fraud against the agent.

Would the fraud be because there's no judgment?

They say, well, he didn't assess attacks, so his actions were fraud.

showing that he didn't commit fraud against you.

There is no administrative remedy for an act of fraud.

then you can claim fraud against them. Against who? The debt collector? Against the debt collector.

endless fraud detection would be a better show to call into. He would be more familiar

endless fraud detection with Steve Skidmore and Neal Switkowski are going to be filling in for Tom

And Money as Debt part two just came out and that goes deeper into the fraud of banking

Steve Skidmore and Neil Switkowski are going to be talking about that on endless fraud

Yeah. But your claim is also that they were perpetrating a fraud against you to collect

stepping forward to take on these big old responsibilities and commit all this fraud.

notices. You hit some people immediately with a bunch of bar grievances for their fraud,

at the mortgage and show everything that's wrong with it. Any fraud in that mortgage,

go back and find fraud from the beginning, you may get back everything you paid and then

some just from the fraud. If you're in foreclosure, out of foreclosure, all of that goes away

once we show fraud, then you can go back from the beginning and work these guys over. We're

back to the banking fraud, and Steve, just sit tight for one second, because Randy Raylor

and I were discussing something on the break concerning the issue again of the fraud of

Okay, Steve, why don't you jump in here and talk about what you've seen with the fraud?

is that the whole thing, because of what the bank's done, is a fraud on its face.

in circles just simply accusing everybody of fraud.

Every time I ask a direct question, the answer is, oh, it's all fraud.

Well, how specifically do they get to the fraud?

I'm asking you, how do they get to the fraud?

Yeah, everything's a fraud.

I've got it, it's all fraud.

Well, speaking of fraud, Steve, why don't you talk about some of the actual technical

aspects of fraud that you have discovered in your research and your dealings?

They're waking up to all the fraud being committed by the finger or branch entities

and it goes to fraud.

If they change it so that it's harder to sue for fraud in the mortgage area, they're going

Public policy is based on fraud.

the bank for fraud, and he's going up, Mike Callaway, against, pro se, against 43 attorneys

They are committing fraud, and there are so many different ways that they are committing

fraud.

Okay, we talked about the fraud, the banking system.

Sharla has ways that she can prove they've committed fraud.

Steve Skidmore has all kinds of ways to prove that they commit fraud.

understand, but there are so many ways that they are committing fraud, and it's the total

And their whole system depends on this fraud.

Yeah, I need help with my mortgage fraud.

Well, Charlotte, isn't there some way that we could go after the bank for fraud for having

From your perspective, what are the things primarily you see that are done wrong to defraud

They're just following a recipe, and unfortunately, that recipe depends upon an element of fraud

That's the fraud of it.

The paper pushers are creating the funds, but how does that defraud the buyer?

We're going to talk about how this defrauds the buyer when we get back on the other side.

You were just about to explain about how people are just being defrauded.

Well, it's total fraud because they never lent you anything anyway.

So it's complete and total fraud.

Well, the biggest fraud in all of that though is if you read any type of loan agreement,

And that is complete and total utter fraud on its face.

taking my home away, how does what we're talking about now, fraud on the face, how does that

So we don't have to say overall, generally, the whole thing you're doing is fraud and

have to prove that the entire system is fraudulent.

made in this country is fraudulent in the real world we live in?

is fraudulent.

initial fraud, and I hope that there are, you know, because that is the root of everything.

Go after them every which way we can, okay, if we can prove fraud through the basic structure

of these tend to amount to errors that defraud the borrower?

So, and these, you're saying they're serious because they defraud the borrower.

who made the loan has the loan based on fraud, and from what I know of that part, if the

loan's based on fraud, then the loan is garbage, and now, I guess, this kind of leads back

companies for fraud, that if you find fraud in the promissory note, it doesn't necessarily

it's fraud. So the note goes away. Yes, it's fraud on its face from the very beginning.

the line. I'd like to bring him into the conversation on the other side. His show Endless Fraud Detection

Now, if they do not have the wet signature document, does that not constitute fraud?

Maybe. It's kind of hard to say if that would constitute fraud or not.

If they do have a connection that they can establish, that may or may not constitute fraud.

and show evidence that they have a right to possess it, that might avoid fraud.

and that constitutes fraud, then why not get them on several accounts of fraud if we can?

Yeah, with the forensic analysis, you don't even need to get them for fraud on the document.

But you're likely to have so many counts of fraud that odds are these guys are not going to want to go there.

That's fraud.

And RESPA will help us primarily to establish the fraud.

we're sitting back here expecting that they haven't violated them and acting in trust with them so that goes to fraud, for which we get to sue them in the local court.

And this is kind of the point of the forensic analysis is find all the fraud we can.

The more fraud we can find, it's not just that it goes to more money, but it goes to deliberate intent.

The question is not whether the fraud occurred, but only the amount.

We've got our guest, Sharla, and also Steve Skidmore from Endless Fraud Detection.

of Steve and Neil's show, Endless Fraud Detection.

So if I have reason to believe that there is fraud in the contract, then I challenge

That sounds like fraud.

That definitely harms you and goes to fraud.

So this is just a way of bypassing your fraud.

If they took over a fraudulent contract, it doesn't stop being fraud.

The fraud never ends, right, Steve?

It's endless fraud.

So is there any fraud?

It seems to me there's like, you know, a gallon of fraud in this deal.

There's a gallon of fraud in most every deal, but I don't understand in your case.

You might want to look at an analysis and go back to these guys for fraud on the contract.

So tonight, we wanted to get into a little bit more of the specifics about the fraud

Well, all we have to do is find fraud in the document and there is a lot of incentive for

the mortgage companies to introduce fraud.

We can go after these guys for fraud and usury.

and it goes to fraud and usury, which is what Randy was describing.

So it has been in their interest to defraud you and defraud everyone.

If they defrauded anything, if they lied to you, if they misrepresented the truth, if

That's all fraud and any contract entered into under fraud is not a contract.

We're looking for the frauds.

that fact could well have led you to make a different decision, that's fraud by nondisclosure.

So if I reveal part of an issue, I'm bound under the fraud statutes to reveal all because

We're here with Sharla, talking about mortgage fraud, we'll be right back.

We are here with our guest, Sharla, talking about the mortgage fraud issues.

So do you have any kind of estimate over the life of a loan of how much fraud cost of the

So, I know it would go to fraud if they didn't.

And then we can project the fraud out to the end and then we come back and sue the lender

for fraud.

And what happens to the loan, to the contract when the contract comes up fraud, it goes

Well, if the contract turns out to be fraud, then they have no contract on which to base

The documents are fraudulent.

the attorney in this case, if it turns out that the documents have fraudulent elements?

Actually you can sue him for fraud along with the rest of them because fraud stretches the

The fraud doesn't...

The clock doesn't start until you discover the fraud.

And if they went through his hands and they were fraudulent, he's touched the star baby

Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 19, Section 371, Conspiracy to Commit Offense or Defraud United

or to defraud the United States.

using these lenders and the fraud of the loans to provide a scapegoat for these economic

My basic allegation was that the guy had filed a complaint for failure to appear that was fraudulent because I had appeared.

subject to this chapter and these rules, is committing fraud knowingly, willingly, and with

it's posted on the website, her deal is exposing this kind of estate fraud

I mean, it just goes on and on, the fraud that is involved.

And because of all the mix ups and the fraudulent shenanigans going on over there,

who also deals with fraud and mortgages and such,

These people need to file fraud against whoever assessed the tax.

That should be – whoever did that should get a fraud complaint against the individual personally.

That is fraud even if a government official does it.

So, I'm looking at suing the dealership for, for fraud.

This was discussed on Gary Johnson's show a few nights ago and it involved estate fraud

And there was some fraud going on robbing Peter to pay Paul to cover his tracks

accusing the district attorney of mail fraud.

The remedy is fraud, and you can sue anybody,

But all of it is fraud from the get-go because none of these organizations have ever had any consideration in any of these deals.

and the securitization of notes and the apparent fraud that's being committed.

what happens in a fraudulent conversion of your funds to the bank's use

They're impeding the bankruptcy and they've got mail fraud problems

there's some possible fraud or misapplication of funds going on and the most critical to

of fraud on their end with a negotiable instrument and you need the postal inspector to do an

A terrorist or say a financial fraud. That's what they're funded for domestic terrorist

But it's based on fraud.

I don't think it's based on fraud, but if you don't, what do you call it,

It's fraud.

teaching people the fraud and getting them all lathered up to go,

oh, not 1817, 1871, is just more evidence of the corruption and fraud

the greatest fraud in human history, they'll fix it.

Like you say, we are under the fraud because we are tricked into these adhesive contracts

and they believe the fraud that has been perpetrated on us by these criminals

And stay tuned for Endless Fraud Detection.

Steve and Neil, Endless Fraud Detection, 10 to midnight every Thursday.

He seeks leniency for helping a worldwide tax fraud probe.

Most of what the government does is unconstitutional and it's based on fraud.

They would do it because of fraud.

and different regulatory bodies saying, this guy's a fraud.

as long as someone is not inducing them to do so through undue influence, by fraud or by other means,

We have Endless Fraud Detection coming up next, a new show.

Please stay tuned, everyone, for Endless Fraud Detection.

Now, if these backscatter machines aren't fraud, I don't know what is.

So please stay tuned for Endless Fraud Detection,

fraud.

Stanford pleaded not guilty in June to charges of fraud, money laundering and obstruction.

Negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, constructive fraud, malicious prosecution, abuse of process,

I think it had something to do with, I don't remember if it was bankruptcy fraud or probate type situation,

That if she adjudicates this case and if she fails to adequately adjudicate each of these due process violations, then she is defrauding the court because the court will have to go through all of this process again as this becomes mandatory.

citing concerns about allegations of fraud and corruption

They should when every state's committing fraud by doing them.

Yeah, well, the problem is they quit committing fraud

It doesn't matter if these were frauds and it doesn't matter if they were legitimate bonds

Well, if these were real, why would you have 249 of them and then a handful of fraud with it?

I would tend to believe that it's a fraud

Somebody's trying to move fake or fraudulent bonds into Switzerland

If nobody really knows how many of these frauds are in existence, it makes everybody wonder what their money actually worth, what not

fraud. Stanford pleaded not guilty in June to charges of fraud, money laundering and

He was investigating some Middle Eastern people who were seen in the presence of McVeigh for HUD fraud and Mr. Richardson was a very respected prosecutor.

is running out, citing concerns about allegations of fraud and corruption and attempts to prejudge

You know, I was even looking at, you know, slander, mail fraud because this is a piece

So in order to do the civil, we have to go back and look at the causes of action, fraud, common law fraud, fraud by nondisclosure.

In this particular case, you would be arguing fraud and standing.

And from a criminal standpoint, I would be claiming fraud, mail fraud, RICO violations, and possibly federal false claims act violations as well.

Absolutely, and stay tuned for Endless Fraud Detection

Madoff was sentenced to 150 years for masterminding a multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme that defrauded

Greenspan said financiers and governments should get tough on fraud and increase capital requirements

Sheen, the highest paid actor on TV, argues that the official 9 11 story is a fraud

And the official story is completely unscientific and a fraud and a lie.

bounty scheme that defrauded thousands of investors.

All this socialized medicine, the climate, the fraud, the scam of global warming, the taxes, the carbon tax.

I mean, I don't even believe this is even valid. This is fraud.

appoint him the trustee of the matter and tell him to investigate this fraud.

Greenspan said financiers and governments should get tough on fraud and increase capital requirements for banks to escape a new crisis.

Sheen, the highest paid actor on TV, argues that the official 9-11 story is a fraud and says the 9-11 commission was a whitewash.

It's a fraud.

We've got endless fraud detection coming up next.

So that was a cause of action for fraud.

Well, they've just been getting away with fraud for so long that, you know, it's just

And not to mention the fact that the whole banking system is fraud on its face.

I mean, not to mention the fact that the whole banking system is fraud on its face.

Well, the conversion here in Texas comes under fraud, Randy. It's under the fraud statute.

You won't. That's what I'm saying. Here in Texas, conversion is under the fraud statute.

Yeah, so you don't, okay, okay. Under criminal fraud or?

Yes, under criminal fraud, go to criminal procedure.

Okay, under fraud and penal code.

partial information, give the impression they've disclosed it all, and therefore it's fraud

As an overview, how do you get to the fraud here?

What is the nature of the fraud here?

Well the nature of the fraud is is that the tax form 1040 only applies to the federal employees which includes federal vendors

intent of this fraud, I don't think it's just greed but there's so many things historically

made a comment with regards to fraud by non-disclosure by virtue of the fact that the 6331 levy form

seems to be rather fraudulent because they only select the portion that's going to justify

to do that is fraud by non-disclosure.

Because the point was made earlier that fraud also obdiates a contract and it's more than

and it is fraud that subject matter jurisdiction can be something that would be attacked at

Oh my God, fraud is just a fraud, let's recall it up and bring it to shame.

and what they have done then is committed a fraud on the court.

And when a fraud is committed on the court, it deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction.

Do you have case law to that point that when a fraud is perpetrated,

Anytime fraud is committed on the court, that is something that is done to interfere with the mechanism,

is fraud on the court.

So I believe this is part of the fraud that was committed by even our Congress

And all of their frauds are on so many different levels,

Number one, there is no statute of limitation on fraud.

If an employer committed fraud against you 25 years ago and you discovered,

you've got a statute of limitation from the time you discovered the fraud to

So, you know, we need to understand that this whole thing is completely fraudulent and,

Right now, stay tuned for Endless Fraud Detection, Steve Skidmore and Neil Switkowski,

and Learn How to Combat Financial Fraud, Banking Fraud, Credit Card Fraud, Mortgage Fraud.

And if you can establish that, you've established fraud

And the fraud mitigates everything

You can demand from the one who commits the fraud triple the amount they would have received had their fraudulent act succeeded

This is something I just came across in mortgage where if they defraud you on your mortgage

Not just the amount that you actually paid that you were actually defrauded of

disclosure laws, campaign finance laws, or filing fraudulent paperwork with any federal

We've got Mr. Jeff Sedgwick with us tonight talking about credit card issues, credit card fraud and such

Just today I was reading a document on mortgage fraud and they addressed this issue of accounting and documentation

As far as we are concerned, it is de facto evidence that fraud has been perpetrated by the submitting attorney

disclosure laws, campaign finance laws, or filing fraudulent paperwork with any federal

You don't always want to try to... Just because they're committing fraud or somehow managing

to find ways to get around it, committing fraud through loopholes or whatever, that

of the way, and commit fraud just blatantly, flagrantly all the time.

and you guys collected insurance, wouldn't that be insurance fraud if indeed you guys did collect insurance on that?

because I don't know if you guys are committing fraud here,

So that comes – you're saying that comes up insurance fraud.

They've made fraud in the insurance program.

they know they're committing fraud, and so they don't push the envelope.

and the government mired in allegations of fraud and corruption has no hope of regaining

Plus, they know they're committing fraud anyway, so it keeps them out of trouble on the criminal side.

And the truth of the matter is that they wouldn't be able to commit the fraud if the courts weren't complicit.

And they wouldn't be able to commit the fraud if the people were educated and knew what was going on too.

�Yes.� �Well to get the trouble damages that comes out of fraud.� �First you would

contract due to the use of subterfuge, and out of that, bank fraud.

Well, why would it be bank fraud if you�re actually asking the bank to bump within the

contract, as we find an unconscionable contract through subterfuge resulting in bank fraud?

And we call that fraud.

And in a fraud, you don't look at what they actually took from you.

What you calculate is, is how much they would have defrauded you of

had their fraudulent plan ran to fruition.

Well, the problem with that is the loanless fraud on its face,

that means if they collect insurance, they collect insurance based on a fraud.

And they're defrauding the federal government here.

Also, it will depend on the kind of fraud

So far, we always find fraud and misconduct.

because you defrauded me.

If the mortgage is fraudulent,

and just what the nature of this fraud really goes to,

the nature of the fraud of the banking system on its face,

And since harm was caused against you under fraud, you asked for it in trouble.

And in the meantime, stay tuned for Endless Fraud Detection, Steve Skidmore and Neal Switkowski coming up next,

So what I'm looking for now, is there any fraud here?

One is being injured for fraud

And I understand that I can go after them for the fraud and the judgment,

refusing to take part in what he called a �cover-up� of fraud in the Afghan election.

downplay the fraud that took place.� The row between Galbraith and Ida goes to the

Galbraith said that before the August 20 election, he wanted to minimize fraud by eliminating

the endless fraud detection.

What he did is totally criminal. It is fraud, it is extortion.

This is fraud on an astronomical scale such that this country has never seen.

the man has committed a massive fraud, which is both a tortable offense and a

They should have made the allegation of fraud as a criminal allegation.

And it also goes to election fraud, too.

this fraudster had never been allowed to enter the election to begin with.

by a fraudster hijacking the presidency?

Instead of saying that Obama committed statutory fraud, that is a criminal act

committed fraud or not, the courts have absolutely statutory subject matter

this, if it's general, you've got to show how the fraud harmed you.

This fraudster still has to be removed from the White House.

attorney general, like I said, but I know for sure they're accusing him of fraud.

ruling that this man has fraudulently taken the presidency and sent the

then that would be, if he's not a citizen, he would have committed a fraud right there,

And if not, if he's not, he committed fraud on the government right there before the election.

But, I mean, my whole thing is that there are so many frauds that would have been there,

but if it's a criminal fraud and you're expecting the Justice Department to prosecute him, I think,

Yeah, but the thing is, it's not about the fraud because then that would potentially go to impeachment.

No, the criminal fraud goes to criminal prosecution, officer.

Well, he still committed a fraud.

Well, it would be a public record of the fraud that he committed because he had to fill out the application.

Yeah, see, that's the link that we need because we can't just say, oh, he committed fraud or he committed these crimes

That would give a citizen standing too because if it's my taxes that were used fraudulently,

then that's how I've been harmed because the money came out of my pockets for this fraudster to take office illegitimately.

worth of internet campaign, finance fraud, or whatever the amount is that he raised illegally

Well it's fraud

That's some pretty serious fraud, no matter how you slice it up

Okay, so if you can show fraud in the note, look at the amount of interest you're paying

You calculate what you would have paid extra had their fraudulent scheme ran to fruition

And what rescission is, is you say, this note was fraudulent from its inception

And since it'd be improper to throw me out of the house for your fraud, I get first opportunity to buy it back from you at current price

can show fraud in the original note or RESPA or TILA violations, Truth in Lending Act or

since I am in the house and I didn't commit the fraud you did, it would be inappropriate

six percent and it stays in 44 grand. If you can show that they defraud you during this housing

Rainy Kelton and Deborah Stevens. Stay tuned for Endless Fraud Detection with Steve Skidmore and

all right, tonight Randy has some material for you, he's going to be discussing fraud

It's a generic fraud.

Yeah, they really put themselves out on the limb when they do that because they are engaging in that fraudulent activity.

I mean, that's why I was saying they didn't have liability. They are liable for these fraudulent criminal acts, though.

Stay tuned for endless fraud detection.

Anyway, so they probably have you listed as some code that would fall under the tax, and that's fraud on its face.

This follows widespread reports the first election was fraudulent.

So that's fraud on its face.

I would want that guy in front of a district judge in the state explaining to a district judge under charges of fraud how you got labeled a mechanic in Guam or something just as idiotic.

You file against unknown persons, and then you file suit against them and move for discovery for unknown perpetrators of fraud.

it's not the IRS, it's some lowlife scumbag who's defrauding both of us, and I want to know who it is.

Then you start hammering the IRS to find out who's perpetrating fraud in their name.

for fraud, malicious prosecution, and perjury.

This follows widespread reports the first election was fraudulent.

I mean, this is not even a very good fraud.

The White House says Barack Obama is delaying his decision on a troop escalation to Afghanistan until the uncertainty surrounding August's fraudulent election is resolved.

File fraud against the tax collector.

When they don't, that's fraud.

What you need to do is send them a tort letter accusing them of perpetrating a fraud

and are trying to steal my money from me by this fraudulent assessment.

He is the host of Endless Fraud Detection.

So go to their website, EndlessFraudDetection.com,

See if there's a similar statute there in Wisconsin, and if there is, sue them for fraud.

And then there'll be the following show, Endless Fraud Detection, Steve Skidmore and Neal Switkowski.

And I really just, I'm so happy because I listen to Agenda and the Endless Fraud and

So we'll see you Saturday and stay tuned for Endless Fraud Detection

debt except in cases of fraud. Now, the Florida Supreme Court has said, well, you know, if

So they're committing the fraud on the federal government.

If you have knowledge that they're defrauding the government, you can sue to recover.

You sue them for what they would have stolen from you had their fraudulent enterprise ran

However, they're the ones committed fraud, not you.

mistakes and fighting fraud.

And all you have to do is go find one thing that's fraudulent, then immediately you file

a counter complaint based on the fraud.

And you can claim the fraud that you've just discovered it, statute of limitations on fraud,

So you didn't discover the fraud until you did a forensic audit and you find all this

fraud and you nail them with the fraud and stop them in their tracks.

And one of the strategies is if we find fraud, then we want to know who those people are

enrichment at your expense through a fraudulent contract.

They didn't know it was fraudulent.

That you're trying to keep from being defrauded yourself

For the fraud they're attempting to commit against both of us

Fraud makes up 22 percent of health care waste, or up to $200 billion a year, in fraudulent

Well, wait, listen, because what I'm trying to tell you is that Endless Fraud Detection

Fraud.

If he acts outside his authority, he violates his contract, collects his pay under fraud

that I've been harmed by fraud from the marginal collection of taxes under threat of losing

So you don't even have to go to fraud for that.

But for fraud, anything you claim under fraud, you get to claim it in

You don't ask for what they actually defrauded you out of.

You ask for what they intended to defraud you out of in triplicate.

So I mean, when you research different forms of fraud and research different types of estoppel...

The statute of limitations, if there is any, and there really isn't any on fraud, that

when you style your pleadings and you have these elements, either fraud or anything that's

fraudulently, that they defrauded you by providing an inferior product, that they showed a quality

product, charged them with fraud, and asked for three times the amount of whatever you

office even if he is convicted. He is accused of tax fraud and false accounting and also

Forensic, yeah ForensicFraudFinder.com and I'll be posting a link on the rule of law radio website too

OK, the website is forensicfraudfinder.com.

ForensicFraudFinder.com?

Or if we find evidence of fraud, then you can sue them.

that's fraud.

That's fraud on its face, and we can sue them.

So we'll get hard evidence of fraud.

defrauding both sides.

If we can find fraud in the loan,

Forensicfraudfinder.com.

Okay, Forensicfraudfinder.com.

You can find out more about the forensic mortgage analysis at ForensicFraudFinder.com

And one thing about that, if I don't find more fraud, then the cost of the analysis,

Because we're fixing to sue every one of them for unjust enrichment through a fraudulent contract,

Now I'm being sued for fraud.

That's forensicfraudfinder.com.

Defrauding both sides.

And it's a scam to hide a lot of this from the, hide the fraud from the actual holder of the security instrument.

But in any case, they're defrauding both sides at the same time.

But they also outsource some of their liabilities for the fraud and the foreclosures on the originators through the legal agreements that they had with their broker.

And they also get to outsource and spread the liabilities for fraud and the foreclosures back to the originators through their legal agreements.

And in looking at this, it appears as though we have this broker and mortgage company standing in the middle here, feeding from both sides, defrauding both sides.

Because the first thing that we want to do is send them a tort letter and accuse them of unjust enrichment on a fraudulent contract.

He's likely to want this guy to buy them back to get him out from under the claim of fraud.

You have the lender on the one side coming after them for fraud.

Then you'll have the investor on the other side coming back at them for fraud.

But the investor's the guy that actually has something on the line, and he's not really responsible for the fraud.

So he himself is probably the fraud.

So even if you're up to date, if it's a fraudulent loan, do you want to be screwed for the next 30 years?

You run the note, find the fraud, go back, and make them fix it.

And some of the things that you can do is if the loan's fraudulent, then you can move for rescission.

However, if the loan was fraudulent and fraudulent by nondisclosure or fraudulent

And these lenders who have been perpetrating these fraudulent loans and getting away with it because the courts are on their side,

and you have grounds to go out to them for fraud.

Or sue the individuals personally for fraud.

for fraud or all these different things, even if you successfully win a case,

either in court or out of court for fraud or whatever, that still does not

from that is that this is fraud and that it basically is a violation of due

just take our property off the tax roll and we'll drop our class action fraud

so now we have to backpedal and sue them for some kind of fraud or

so they want to drive us out by fraudulently inflating the property

Property taxes is a fraud or fraudulent contract because of a lot of side issues that Randy and Eddie, they're probably more up on than I am.

Fraud and attempted extortion

For fraud and extortion

For fraud

Stating why it was fraud in public record

As well as the fraud

Inless fraud detection he's helping out

But she got the property back because of fraud, and what the attorney did.

And as they're being collected, it's a fraud.

If we can show fraud on the part of the appraisal district,

Well, proving the fraud is going to be difficult

But the burden of proof to prove the fraud has to deal with the burden of proof

of the knowledge of the individual that supposedly committed the fraud.

Even though at the beginning when I was induced and defrauded by acquiescing to registering my sale or my purchase of property with the state,

And if he has been induced and defrauded into accepting U.S. citizenship, he has to, first of all, refute the privilege of suffrage.

of working with Randy Kelton in regards to the forensic fraud finding process, went back

sure I fully understand his question about, he mentioned you and forensic fraud. I have

the basis of an accusation of fraud or where do we go with that? What do we do with that

legally? Well, the whole system is based on fraud, but it's a fraud that they are aware

is if there's some type of mortgage fraud associated with past transactions and you

And with all of this fraud going on, I'm looking for the underlying motivation.

We'll talk to you tomorrow night. Stay tuned right now for endless fraud detection.

And what was the basic of the allegation? If you owned the property, was this an act of fraud or mistake?

They did not. And so what happened was that was fraud.

And so an actionable cause in the case would be to go after the fraud that was promoted to the court.

like with the grand jury or with the prosecutor for fraud.

it will say, usually indicates fraud.

No, it does not usually indicate fraud.

own credit, and the loan was fraud, and you've kept your property.

You challenge the contract in a case called fraud and the inducement.

If they did not give you full disclosure, that constitutes fraud and the inducement.

You just prove fraud and the inducement, and you just won your case.

Not easy to prove fraud in any case, but that's all you have to do.

But fraud by non-disclosure is not so difficult to prove.

See, when you're dealing with fraud by non-disclosure, you're trying to prove the lack of existence

perpetrated fraud in the preparation of the contract and I rescind the contract.

Don't resend a contract when they perpetrate fraud.

Go after them for fraud.

They didn't disclose to you that they were committing fraud in the process of signing

It's an element of signature, so you go after them for fraud and the inducement.

That's part of the process is you go after them for fraud and one of the things I do

and what I do is I calculate the amount of fraud that would have accrued had their plan

I sue them for triple the amount of fraud they would have extracted from me had it ran

The statute of fraud told until you discover the fraud because the nature of fraud is for

Don't say the statute of fraud, just say fraud.

Because when you say statute of fraud, that's a descriptive term in and of itself.

Well it's a nice idea but it doesn't work that way because remedy and fraud only has

It's not discover remedy that the statute told when you discover fraud.

Well yeah, when you discover fraud, that's correct.

Depends on what the charge is, if it's fraud it's 3 to 5 years depending upon what the fraud is

Or from the moment that the fraud was discovered

and now we hope to get all the video editing completed. Neil Switkowski from Endless Fraud

be able to answer it. I've got a friend of mine, I was looking at his forensic fraud

facilitate whether or not there is a possibility of fraud. Once it does that, then it'll flag

a bar grievance against each one for sending out fraudulent mailings.

Gary, Bill, call back in and stay tuned for endless fraud detection coming right up.

All right. I can see fraud on so many levels. I think it's time for Randy's mortgage analysis

fraud in the court by not being a judge or a magistrate and then, you know, kind of like

been suspecting for a long time that the Travis County Appraisal District is committing fraud

When a holder-in-due course is by a negotiable instrument without notice of a defect to the instrument, such as a lien on it or a fraudulent inducement

The holder-in-due courses take good title unless there is a so-called real defense, such as a lack of capacity or fraud in the factum, a forged signature

It's saying that if you enter into a contract and there's fraud in the contract, then you have standing to object to the contract

And this goes to big time fraud. It's part of the issue that we were bringing is we had Paul on and he talked about how these notes are bundled together into a pool and sold out

It was absolute total knowing fraud, but they did not put that warning in the contracts because they did not want the purchaser of these notes being aware that they would be held responsible for what the lenders do

And when the current owner of the note gets a tort letter telling them about all the crapola that the mortgage company pulled and claiming that you are the present owner and you are receiving unjust enrichment based on a fraudulent contract

We find that in the note. We triple it. That's what we sue them for. Under fraud, you don't sue them for what they stole from you. You sue them for what they would have stole from you had to plan random fruition. And when we come back, there's a number of other things that we can do

You start knocking 2000 per violation off the head of the note and then run the note and show how much extra you would wind up paying. What we maintain is, this was fraud they committed against you

We took the fine of this amount, we took it off the head of the note and it calculated out to an overpayment of this amount. And since all of this constitutes fraud, we tripled that and sue them for that amount

We need to overthrow the tyranny that is upon us and the fraud that is going on in the county appraisal districts.

were trying to adjudicate or did you just decide to go after them because they're fraudulent?

I want to charge them with fraud for doing it wrong this time. Because it's all fraud on it anyway.

Endless fraud detection.

All right, well, listeners, stay tuned for endless fraud detection, Steve Skidmore and Neil Switkowski coming up right after this.

As you well know, I'm being punished for exposing government fraud.

here, showing them that the county clerks are committing security fraud by taking a

are totally fraudulent, they don't go to court to enforce them.

there's probably the biggest Ponzi scheme real estate developmental fraud ever witnessed.

fraud, bribe, graft, scam.

confidence we have fraud complicity and ignorance running rampant in the halls

People are losing more money because of leverage, more crimes and fraud are being uncovered

the extremeness of the total fraudulency of the rigged elections doesn't really start

so disorganized and so completely fraudulent that they get nothing in return.

Then you can go after them for credit card fraud.

that's credit card fraud.

And the people did lose their money, the depositors that had money in those fraudulent banks.

And of late, we can see we got a golden parachute which enables the fraudulent banks to pass

Nobody's allowed to say, let the fraudulent banks fail, you know?

Of course, with that comes the argument, if the fraudulent banks fail, then a lot of people

will lose their money who have entrusted them that money to the fraudulent banks.

But it's also true that if you don't let the fraudulent banks fail, they will continue

to be fraudulent forevermore.

Stay tuned for Endless Fraud Defense.

And one of the things was for that was because they were frauds.

they did was fraudulent.

I've been told I can get him for fraud now if he's trying to collect on a fraudulent

fraudulent thing? What if this attorney just made the whole thing up and these alleged creditors

called perjury and fraud.

He does a show, Endless Fraud Detection, with Steve Skidmore

If you told the judge that, they're committing fraud upon the court,

The whole thing of the third-party debt collector is just fraud on its face, period.

It's just complete fraud on its face, period.

that says because of all the fraud and all the stuff that was going on,

We actually have Neal Switkowski and Steve Skidmore from Endless Fraud Detection have both called in.

with all the stuff that's going on today with the fraud and the identity theft and so on and so forth,

who's actually a host on this network in this fraud detection.

And then you'd be watching for it. So the cause of action is the fraud that they committed by not giving you the booklet was part of the fraud. Now that's cause of action.

No, I'm not saying, but in the event that it is, because this would be a large considerable amount of money because there's fraud, there's all kinds of issues in there.

You may want to download the archive we had Michael Miras on, who is the third-party debt collector expert on how to stop these guys and their fraud.

where fraudulent signatures were put on the HUD documents.

I anticipate to get my house for nothing because of the fraud that was committed

Please stay tuned for Endless Fraud Detection.

that got shut down for fraud.

them for fraud on that because you're presenting documents that don't exist and he responded

that judgment was fraudulently obtained so that's the point but talk about the disk,

That adds fraud, criminal conspiracy, and organized criminal activity.

it's regarding biometric ID fraud

using it fraudulently

They're defrauding her of that and all their other employees.

And the fraud comes into places, there's a lot of things that are really close to being

sue claim fraud counter sue for three times what they're suing you for okay uh first of all my

And it seems like that would save waste fraud and abuse issues with the court, you know

And believe me, this is an issue that's important to everybody in Texas because this is a massive, massive fraud

Besides getting him fired and thrown in jail for fraud?

He ended up running the registration sticker and the registration sticker was fraudulent, totally unbeknownst to me.

And under fraud by nondisclosure, we maintain that he was trying to get us to do something.

Let me read the elements of a cause of action for fraud by nondisclosure

And in this one, the elements of cause of action for fraud by nondisclosure are the following.

A lot of you out there are familiar with the case Twiel v. U.S., where it says that it's fraud to fail to speak when you have a duty to speak.

Twiel says it is only fraud when someone is silent when they have a duty to speak.

They're saying that is the only time silence is fraud.

Because their pleading is fraudulent?

It was a fraudulent pleading, and they forced you to answer it.

They invoked the authority of the court to your detriment, and they did so by fraud.

And what elements do you need for fraud?

Yes, I would sue them for fraud.

ForensicFraudFinder.com.

Okay, alright, stay tuned for Endless Fraud Detection

We charged common law fraud.

We charged fraud by nondisclosure and the one we were discussing was fraud by nondisclosure.

Three times the amount they would defraud you from plus cost, and aggravated perjury against the marshal,

criminal probes and allegations of fraud.

UN's anti-corruption task force has found out a single significant fraud or corruption case has

Right now, stay tuned for endless fraud detection.

And what twill does is goes to fraud by non-disclosure

Silence can only be equated with fraud

That one would be less access and fraud

It's certainly fraudulent.

As a citizen's committee, go before the legislature and demand to be heard about this fraud.

Well, in the process of the contract, the officer commits fraud,