Detecting language using up to the first 30 seconds. Use `--language` to specify the language
Detected language: English
[00:00.000 --> 00:30.000]  Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[00:30.000 --> 00:35.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[00:35.000 --> 00:40.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[00:40.000 --> 00:45.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[00:45.000 --> 00:50.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[00:50.000 --> 00:55.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[00:55.000 --> 01:00.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:00.000 --> 01:05.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:05.000 --> 01:10.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:10.000 --> 01:15.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:15.000 --> 01:20.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:20.000 --> 01:25.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:25.000 --> 01:30.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:30.000 --> 01:35.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:35.000 --> 01:40.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:40.000 --> 01:45.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:45.000 --> 01:50.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:50.000 --> 01:55.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[01:55.000 --> 02:00.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:00.000 --> 02:05.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:05.000 --> 02:10.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:10.000 --> 02:15.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:15.000 --> 02:20.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:20.000 --> 02:25.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:25.000 --> 02:30.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:30.000 --> 02:35.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:35.000 --> 02:40.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:40.000 --> 02:45.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:45.000 --> 02:50.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:50.000 --> 02:55.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[02:55.000 --> 03:00.000]  Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad Boys, Bad
[03:01.000 --> 03:05.000]  That said that a citizen
[03:06.000 --> 03:10.000]  can't. It said the complaints are to be filed
[03:10.000 --> 03:12.000]  with the attorney general.
[03:14.000 --> 03:15.000]  I'm sorry, the U.S. attorney.
[03:15.000 --> 03:18.000]  What kind of complaints are you talking about?
[03:18.000 --> 03:19.000]  Criminal.
[03:20.000 --> 03:22.000]  For federal crimes?
[03:22.000 --> 03:26.000]  Yeah, and that if you gave notice,
[03:26.000 --> 03:29.000]  if the complainant requested it,
[03:29.000 --> 03:32.000]  the U.S. attorney must give notice to the grand jury.
[03:32.000 --> 03:34.000]  I can't refine that.
[03:35.000 --> 03:38.000]  But what I'm finding about grand juries
[03:38.000 --> 03:40.000]  in the Fed is really iffy.
[03:42.000 --> 03:44.000]  So I just created
[03:45.000 --> 03:47.000]  some complaints against the Fifth Circuit judges
[03:48.000 --> 03:49.000]  and the
[03:50.000 --> 03:54.000]  magistrate and judge in Austin
[03:54.000 --> 03:57.000]  who dismissed my case with prejudice.
[03:59.000 --> 04:01.000]  What I'm alleging is,
[04:02.000 --> 04:03.000]  is that the
[04:04.000 --> 04:06.000]  Fifth Circuit judges, the
[04:07.000 --> 04:11.000]  magistrate judge Hightower and trial judge,
[04:12.000 --> 04:14.000]  I forget his name, starts with a P,
[04:14.000 --> 04:16.000]  Pittman maybe,
[04:17.000 --> 04:21.000]  that they acted in concert inclusion with one another
[04:21.000 --> 04:25.000]  for the purpose of denying me access
[04:25.000 --> 04:28.000]  to the courts for legal remedy
[04:29.000 --> 04:33.000]  for the singular and sole reason that I was a pro se litigant
[04:35.000 --> 04:39.000]  and that they failed to properly apply the law to the facts
[04:39.000 --> 04:41.000]  as required by Walker v. Packer
[04:41.000 --> 04:44.000]  as shown by the fact that the state
[04:45.000 --> 04:49.000]  in their bench book the next year
[04:50.000 --> 04:53.000]  changed the exact issue
[04:53.000 --> 04:56.000]  I filed this suit to get changed.
[04:56.000 --> 05:01.000]  And by that change they established that my suit was not frivolous.
[05:03.000 --> 05:07.000]  So I'm asking the new attorney general
[05:08.000 --> 05:12.000]  since I'm filing against Fifth Circuit judges,
[05:13.000 --> 05:16.000]  I'm filing it straight with the U.S. Attorney General.
[05:18.000 --> 05:22.000]  And what I want her to do is read my complaint.
[05:22.000 --> 05:25.000]  So she sees this part that says
[05:26.000 --> 05:28.000]  she changed a tiny little thing,
[05:29.000 --> 05:31.000]  or a seemingly tiny little thing,
[05:32.000 --> 05:34.000]  and it led to
[05:35.000 --> 05:38.000]  results and outcomes nobody anticipated.
[05:40.000 --> 05:42.000]  This thing of
[05:43.000 --> 05:47.000]  not taking a person directly to the nearest magistrate on arrest.
[05:48.000 --> 05:50.000]  And I have it in my mind,
[05:50.000 --> 05:51.000]  on arrest.
[05:51.000 --> 05:54.000]  And I have in there the argument about Barker-Ringo
[05:55.000 --> 05:56.000]  and how
[05:57.000 --> 05:58.000]  the
[05:59.000 --> 06:00.000]  if the state
[06:00.000 --> 06:02.000]  You've identified this as being a
[06:02.000 --> 06:06.000]  a change that was people didn't anticipate the problems it would cause.
[06:07.000 --> 06:10.000]  Yes, it was one of a seemingly minor little change
[06:11.000 --> 06:14.000]  that caused an effect no one anticipated.
[06:14.000 --> 06:17.000]  And it took 50 years for the
[06:17.000 --> 06:19.000]  the effect to become
[06:19.000 --> 06:21.000]  pronounced enough
[06:21.000 --> 06:24.000]  that I've finally figured out what it was.
[06:25.000 --> 06:27.000]  And that's in my argument.
[06:28.000 --> 06:32.000]  I want to force the new attorney general or her
[06:33.000 --> 06:35.000]  people to read that
[06:37.000 --> 06:39.000]  while I'm going after
[06:39.000 --> 06:42.000]  the judges of the Fifth Circuit.
[06:42.000 --> 06:46.000]  We filed a 150-page lawsuit.
[06:47.000 --> 06:49.000]  Carabelle and I.
[06:50.000 --> 06:52.000]  And the
[06:54.000 --> 06:56.000]  magistrate judge wrote
[06:57.000 --> 06:58.000]  a
[06:59.000 --> 07:02.000]  findings of facts and conclusions at law that was
[07:02.000 --> 07:04.000]  absolute trash.
[07:05.000 --> 07:07.000]  The case law was absolute trash.
[07:07.000 --> 07:09.000]  And I argued in here that
[07:09.000 --> 07:11.000]  the reason CHAT GPT
[07:12.000 --> 07:13.000]  cannot produce
[07:14.000 --> 07:16.000]  effective and relevant case law
[07:17.000 --> 07:21.000]  is because the state of case law citation in this country
[07:21.000 --> 07:23.000]  is a horrible mess.
[07:23.000 --> 07:24.000]  And the
[07:25.000 --> 07:29.000]  case law used by the magistrate Hightower
[07:30.000 --> 07:32.000]  in proposing to the trial judge
[07:33.000 --> 07:35.000]  that he dismiss my case
[07:35.000 --> 07:37.000]  is absolutely atrocious.
[07:38.000 --> 07:40.000]  Garbage in, garbage out.
[07:40.000 --> 07:41.000]  Exactly.
[07:42.000 --> 07:45.000]  And that the trial judge, for his part,
[07:46.000 --> 07:50.000]  is, and here I made the argument in order to encourage
[07:51.000 --> 07:55.000]  the, I hope I can get this to the president, encourage him
[07:55.000 --> 07:57.000]  to appoint two more judges in Austin.
[07:58.000 --> 08:00.000]  That Judge Pitman
[08:01.000 --> 08:02.000]  is
[08:02.000 --> 08:06.000]  handling a docket that should be handled by three judges.
[08:08.000 --> 08:10.000]  Judge Sparks retired.
[08:10.000 --> 08:12.000]  And then Judge Yackel, his
[08:13.000 --> 08:16.000]  calendar was so overcrowded that he retired
[08:17.000 --> 08:19.000]  and left everything to Judge Pitman.
[08:19.000 --> 08:20.000]  And, well, I get it.
[08:20.000 --> 08:23.000]  Judge Pitman doesn't have time to do his job.
[08:24.000 --> 08:27.000]  His problem, not my problem.
[08:27.000 --> 08:28.000]  He doesn't-
[08:28.000 --> 08:31.000]  Better not rule if he can't have the time to read it.
[08:31.000 --> 08:35.000]  Exactly, he don't get to dismiss my case with prejudice
[08:35.000 --> 08:37.000]  just because he don't have time to mess with it.
[08:38.000 --> 08:40.000]  So, I go after him criminally.
[08:40.000 --> 08:44.000]  And what I want to do is give him plausible deniability
[08:44.000 --> 08:47.000]  to go to Trump and say, look,
[08:48.000 --> 08:50.000]  help me out here.
[08:51.000 --> 08:53.000]  Appoint me a couple of judges
[08:53.000 --> 08:55.000]  Help me out here.
[08:56.000 --> 08:59.000]  Appoint me a couple of more federal judges.
[09:00.000 --> 09:04.000]  And Trump, for his part, needs to appoint all the federal judges he can.
[09:05.000 --> 09:08.000]  So, I suspect politically
[09:08.000 --> 09:11.000]  that Trump's going to be amenable
[09:13.000 --> 09:14.000]  to appointing more federal judges.
[09:14.000 --> 09:18.000]  And the right one to get him to do that is the new attorney general.
[09:19.000 --> 09:23.000]  So, I'm filing this complaint with the new attorney general.
[09:27.000 --> 09:28.000]  Sounds good.
[09:28.000 --> 09:30.000]  So, that's the idea.
[09:30.000 --> 09:36.000]  I have posted the complaint on the Telegram channel.
[09:36.000 --> 09:38.000]  I mean, it is the first time through.
[09:39.000 --> 09:44.000]  And I just got- I was a little late because I had Eddie Craig on the line.
[09:44.000 --> 09:48.000]  He has pulled that off the channel, apparently,
[09:48.000 --> 09:50.000]  and is ripping it to shreds for me.
[09:51.000 --> 09:52.000]  Oh, good.
[09:52.000 --> 09:54.000]  I didn't make you pass the first part there
[09:54.000 --> 09:56.000]  where you're asserting
[09:59.000 --> 10:02.000]  upon information and belief and on personal knowledge.
[10:04.000 --> 10:06.000]  That's where I got stuck.
[10:07.000 --> 10:11.000]  I don't remember personal knowledge still being in there.
[10:11.000 --> 10:16.000]  I think it was probably that you were going to use that language for multiple things
[10:16.000 --> 10:18.000]  and you're going to delete whichever one you're not using,
[10:18.000 --> 10:20.000]  and they're both stuck in there together.
[10:21.000 --> 10:23.000]  And if there's two in there, I will take that out.
[10:25.000 --> 10:28.000]  But this is just a standard complaint that should have said,
[10:28.000 --> 10:33.000]  I have reason to believe and do believe that so-and-so,
[10:33.000 --> 10:35.000]  I'll change the front,
[10:35.000 --> 10:38.000]  or I'll say I have reason to believe and do believe that
[10:38.000 --> 10:39.000]  Judge Wilson,
[10:42.000 --> 10:43.000]  Smith,
[10:44.000 --> 10:46.000]  and I forget the other one, has his logger name,
[10:47.000 --> 10:50.000]  and Magistrate Hightower and Judge Pittman
[10:53.000 --> 10:56.000]  acted in concert and collusion, one with the other,
[10:56.000 --> 11:00.000]  toward a violation of 18 U.S. Code 371
[11:01.000 --> 11:03.000]  and 18 U.S. Code 241
[11:04.000 --> 11:06.000]  based on the first part of the complaint.
[11:07.000 --> 11:10.000]  Based on the following, colon.
[11:11.000 --> 11:17.000]  And then I go into the allegation of the facts in the case.
[11:19.000 --> 11:22.000]  I will be attaching my complaint against the governor.
[11:23.000 --> 11:26.000]  It has really nothing to do with it, but I want them to look at it.
[11:28.000 --> 11:34.000]  I want them to look at, this is a pro se individual filing this suit.
[11:35.000 --> 11:38.000]  So I'm going to attach this complaint against the governor,
[11:38.000 --> 11:42.000]  and I alleged in there that the complaint resulted in
[11:43.000 --> 11:47.000]  the governor rescinding all of his executive orders,
[11:47.000 --> 11:51.000]  and I expect that they will find that interesting.
[11:53.000 --> 11:55.000]  I'm hoping I get them to read it,
[11:56.000 --> 12:00.000]  so that when they get to the rest of the arguments that I'm making,
[12:01.000 --> 12:05.000]  they won't consider me some sovereign citizen
[12:06.000 --> 12:09.000]  that just crawled out of West Virginia,
[12:10.000 --> 12:12.000]  some ridgeline in West Virginia,
[12:13.000 --> 12:17.000]  that they'll get the idea that this is not our first rodeo.
[12:19.000 --> 12:24.000]  So that when they read their next reference to the lawsuit that I filed,
[12:24.000 --> 12:26.000]  which will also be attached,
[12:26.000 --> 12:33.000]  that they will look at that as grounds for support for my claims against
[12:34.000 --> 12:40.000]  the Fifth Circuit judges and the trial court judges.
[12:41.000 --> 12:49.000]  Criminal complaints against the Fifth Circuit is probably going to be very unusual.
[12:51.000 --> 12:54.000]  So I'm hoping this gets their attention.
[12:57.000 --> 12:59.000]  So they read that,
[13:00.000 --> 13:05.000]  and the overall gist of what I'm asking for is what I want to create,
[13:06.000 --> 13:13.000]  is I want the attorney general to instruct the U.S. attorneys
[13:13.000 --> 13:19.000]  that when they get a complaint alleging a federal felony crime,
[13:20.000 --> 13:26.000]  that they are to present that complaint to the grand jury.
[13:27.000 --> 13:31.000]  Well, I'll tell you what I found just briefly here about this grand jury.
[13:32.000 --> 13:35.000]  You were asking if you could re-find it.
[13:36.000 --> 13:46.000]  So far, the closest I'm seeing to that is in Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
[13:46.000 --> 13:53.000]  Rule 6 says that if the public interest so requires,
[13:53.000 --> 13:55.000]  then the court can order it.
[13:55.000 --> 13:57.000]  But hold on just a moment.
[13:57.000 --> 13:59.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[14:16.000 --> 14:18.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[14:46.000 --> 14:48.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[14:48.000 --> 14:50.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[14:50.000 --> 14:52.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[14:52.000 --> 14:54.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[14:54.000 --> 14:56.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[14:56.000 --> 14:58.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[14:58.000 --> 15:00.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:00.000 --> 15:02.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:02.000 --> 15:04.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:04.000 --> 15:06.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:06.000 --> 15:08.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:08.000 --> 15:10.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:10.000 --> 15:12.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:12.000 --> 15:14.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:14.000 --> 15:16.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:16.000 --> 15:18.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:18.000 --> 15:20.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:20.000 --> 15:22.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:22.000 --> 15:24.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:24.000 --> 15:26.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:26.000 --> 15:28.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:28.000 --> 15:30.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:30.000 --> 15:32.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:32.000 --> 15:34.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:34.000 --> 15:36.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:36.000 --> 15:38.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:38.000 --> 15:40.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:40.000 --> 15:42.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:42.000 --> 15:44.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:44.000 --> 15:46.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:46.000 --> 15:48.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:48.000 --> 15:50.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:50.000 --> 15:52.000]  We're about to go to our sponsors, and we'll talk about it some more.
[15:52.000 --> 15:56.000]  Live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m.
[15:56.000 --> 16:00.000]  to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[16:02.000 --> 16:05.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[16:05.000 --> 16:09.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[16:22.000 --> 16:24.000]  Look what we've got
[16:24.000 --> 16:27.000]  Who reacts? The Christians
[16:27.000 --> 16:29.000]  Wonder what they hide
[16:29.000 --> 16:32.000]  They don't have the answers
[16:32.000 --> 16:34.000]  Open up eyes
[16:34.000 --> 16:37.000]  Who reacts? The Christians
[16:37.000 --> 16:39.000]  Look what we've got
[16:39.000 --> 16:42.000]  And they don't have the answers
[16:42.000 --> 16:44.000]  All slope and slip and slide
[16:44.000 --> 16:46.000]  I'm a talk both issues per se Lord
[16:46.000 --> 16:48.000]  How the one we tend take it easy
[16:48.000 --> 16:51.000]  Them a talk we do politically
[16:51.000 --> 16:54.000]  And them getting mad and angry
[16:54.000 --> 16:56.000]  But them not standing up and fight
[16:56.000 --> 16:59.000]  And fight for the freedom and be free
[16:59.000 --> 17:01.000]  Okay, we are back.
[17:01.000 --> 17:03.000]  Rulo Law Radio, Randy Kelton.
[17:03.000 --> 17:05.000]  I'm Brett Fountain.
[17:05.000 --> 17:07.000]  And we're talking about Grand Jury.
[17:07.000 --> 17:15.000]  And we're talking about how the complaints can trigger the need for a Grand Jury to be held.
[17:15.000 --> 17:17.000]  Why don't I continue looking, Randy?
[17:17.000 --> 17:20.000]  You said you wanted to look into some statutes for that.
[17:20.000 --> 17:24.000]  So I'll look in 18 U.S. Code and look at the criminal procedure.
[17:24.000 --> 17:27.000]  And you can continue telling us about your...
[17:27.000 --> 17:32.000]  Something tells me I saw that in 28 U.S. Code.
[17:32.000 --> 17:35.000]  But anyway, there was a...
[17:35.000 --> 17:38.000]  I tripped over a statute that said that
[17:38.000 --> 17:48.000]  That the federal complaints are directed to the U.S. attorney.
[17:48.000 --> 17:54.000]  And the U.S. attorney, if it's a felony, is...
[17:54.000 --> 17:56.000]  There must be...
[17:56.000 --> 18:00.000]  It didn't exactly tell the U.S. attorney.
[18:00.000 --> 18:10.000]  But it did say that in the matter of a felony, there must be an indictment by a Grand Jury.
[18:10.000 --> 18:16.000]  They did not say the U.S. attorney must present the complaint to the Grand Jury.
[18:16.000 --> 18:19.000]  They didn't say that.
[18:19.000 --> 18:30.000]  They did say that they must give the complaint to the Grand Jury if the complainant requests it.
[18:30.000 --> 18:35.000]  I'm saying this is BS.
[18:35.000 --> 18:42.000]  What they're doing is putting control of the Grand Jury in the hands of the U.S. attorney.
[18:42.000 --> 18:47.000]  Well, the U.S. attorney is not a judicial officer.
[18:47.000 --> 18:53.000]  The U.S. attorney may not make a determination of probable cause.
[18:53.000 --> 18:58.000]  Either a federal magistrate can make a determination of probable cause.
[18:58.000 --> 19:06.000]  And I don't mean that magistrate who looks at my case before he gives it to the judge.
[19:06.000 --> 19:15.000]  I mean every judicial officer who sits in a judicial capacity is also a magistrate.
[19:15.000 --> 19:18.000]  I mean real magistrate.
[19:18.000 --> 19:21.000]  That capacity.
[19:21.000 --> 19:29.000]  Or if it's a felony, there must be an indictment.
[19:29.000 --> 19:33.000]  So what they're going to say is first we give it to a magistrate.
[19:33.000 --> 19:39.000]  The magistrate decides whether or not there is probable cause.
[19:39.000 --> 19:43.000]  And if they find probable cause, then it goes to the Grand Jury.
[19:43.000 --> 19:47.000]  And the Grand Jury will find an indictment.
[19:47.000 --> 19:50.000]  Now I'm saying hell with that crap.
[19:50.000 --> 19:56.000]  Now maybe your law enforcement officers are bound by that garbage.
[19:56.000 --> 19:59.000]  But I am not.
[19:59.000 --> 20:03.000]  This is not a democracy.
[20:03.000 --> 20:08.000]  This is not a governmental form of government.
[20:08.000 --> 20:15.000]  Wherein the government itself determines adjudication of cases.
[20:15.000 --> 20:19.000]  This is a republic.
[20:19.000 --> 20:33.000]  The only difference I can find between a democracy and a republic is the sovereign position of the citizen before the republic.
[20:33.000 --> 20:41.000]  I'm sorry, the sovereign position of the citizen before the governmental instruments.
[20:41.000 --> 20:49.000]  So when I go to my governmental instruments, I am sovereign over those instruments.
[20:49.000 --> 21:02.000]  I do not give a judicial officer permission to decide whether or not I can give notice of crime to a Grand Jury or not.
[21:02.000 --> 21:13.000]  Now that governmental agency can write laws that direct employees of that governmental agency.
[21:13.000 --> 21:22.000]  I.E. enforcement arms of the government in how they are to process criminal complaints.
[21:22.000 --> 21:25.000]  They can do that.
[21:25.000 --> 21:31.000]  But I'm not part of the executive branch that would have that power.
[21:31.000 --> 21:34.000]  The U.S. attorney is a part of the executive branch.
[21:34.000 --> 21:40.000]  He's appointed by the president and serves at the pleasure of the president.
[21:40.000 --> 21:44.000]  He's an executive officer.
[21:44.000 --> 21:47.000]  I am not a part of the executive branch.
[21:47.000 --> 21:52.000]  Either am I a part of the judicial branch.
[21:52.000 --> 21:54.000]  I am sovereign over all of them.
[21:54.000 --> 21:58.000]  Nobody tells me what to do.
[21:58.000 --> 22:04.000]  If I choose to give notice to a grand jury of crime.
[22:04.000 --> 22:09.000]  There can be no law preventing me from doing that.
[22:09.000 --> 22:18.000]  If there is a law preventing me from doing that, then this is no longer a public.
[22:18.000 --> 22:27.000]  Now it is a democracy and the Constitution guarantees me a republic.
[22:27.000 --> 22:34.000]  This is the argument I'm going to make to the attorney general.
[22:34.000 --> 22:42.000]  Well, I can see a possibility that they would say.
[22:42.000 --> 22:46.000]  This could still be a republic and you could have all your rights and everything.
[22:46.000 --> 22:54.000]  If this particular action of taking it to the grand jury or even deciding to take it to the grand jury.
[22:54.000 --> 22:57.000]  Has that been something that the people have elected?
[22:57.000 --> 23:08.000]  And if so, and if that has been designated to a certain role, then that would seem to be perfectly legit.
[23:08.000 --> 23:11.000]  I don't know that that's ever happened.
[23:11.000 --> 23:13.000]  I don't see that it has.
[23:13.000 --> 23:16.000]  Say that about elected again.
[23:16.000 --> 23:25.000]  If we the people have said via our legislators that such an action,
[23:25.000 --> 23:30.000]  the deciding of something is going to the grand jury or not,
[23:30.000 --> 23:36.000]  that this decision is the authority for that is vested in some X, Y, Z role.
[23:36.000 --> 23:39.000]  Oh, it's going to be the U.S. attorney, whatever.
[23:39.000 --> 23:42.000]  So I don't think it should be that person.
[23:42.000 --> 23:47.000]  But I'm just saying that if that decision has been already codified
[23:47.000 --> 23:52.000]  and there is somebody that's lawfully authorized to do that,
[23:52.000 --> 23:54.000]  I don't think that destroys the republic.
[23:54.000 --> 24:02.000]  I think it's something that maybe the role needs to be moved or distinguished or something like that.
[24:02.000 --> 24:06.000]  But I don't think it destroys the republic.
[24:06.000 --> 24:14.000]  Yes, it does, because it presupposes that a governmental instrument
[24:14.000 --> 24:19.000]  can restrict the right of the sovereign, of a citizen.
[24:19.000 --> 24:22.000]  Yeah, that would be, I would say, an unconstitutional application,
[24:22.000 --> 24:28.000]  because if it's going to be a restricting, then that's no good.
[24:28.000 --> 24:30.000]  They can't expect you to always do it.
[24:30.000 --> 24:34.000]  But if you do it, then you certainly ought to be allowed to.
[24:34.000 --> 24:40.000]  Where they can tell an ATF agent, an FBI agent, ICE agent,
[24:40.000 --> 24:46.000]  they can tell them when you have a criminal complaint, this is what you must do with it.
[24:46.000 --> 24:48.000]  They can't tell me what to do.
[24:48.000 --> 24:53.000]  And it has been well established, primarily Montgomery v. State,
[24:53.000 --> 25:00.000]  where Scalia said that the grand jury is essentially a fourth branch of government.
[25:00.000 --> 25:08.000]  It does not fall under the executive, neither does it fall under the judicial.
[25:08.000 --> 25:16.000]  Therefore, I cannot be restricted by either one of those.
[25:16.000 --> 25:25.000]  The grand jury is a governmental instrument I have created.
[25:25.000 --> 25:27.000]  It answers to me.
[25:27.000 --> 25:30.000]  It's not even subject to the legislative branch.
[25:30.000 --> 25:31.000]  I think it's really cool.
[25:31.000 --> 25:39.000]  Not enough people know that juries can throw a law out and say, this is not good.
[25:39.000 --> 25:40.000]  Thomas Jefferson said-
[25:40.000 --> 25:41.000]  I love it.
[25:41.000 --> 25:49.000]  The ultimate remedy for bad law is a jury that will refuse to enforce the law.
[25:49.000 --> 25:56.000]  If the jury will not enforce the law, legislature have to change it.
[25:56.000 --> 25:58.000]  And that is a petit jury.
[25:58.000 --> 26:07.000]  Grand juries by Scalia's Montgomery v. State clearly set grand jury apart from the rest of government.
[26:07.000 --> 26:17.000]  So for the executive branch to attempt to tell me that I cannot approach a grand jury
[26:17.000 --> 26:24.000]  and give a grand jury member notice of crime, and under the duties of grand jurors,
[26:24.000 --> 26:29.000]  it is the duty of a grand jury to examine into all crimes that come to their knowledge
[26:29.000 --> 26:37.000]  by way of the prosecuting attorney or any member of the grand jury.
[26:37.000 --> 26:41.000]  So how could any restriction come in play?
[26:41.000 --> 26:44.000]  That's going to be the argument.
[26:44.000 --> 26:54.000]  I'm going to ask the attorney general to direct all U.S. attorneys when they get a complaint
[26:54.000 --> 26:58.000]  by a private citizen to give that directly to the grand jury.
[26:58.000 --> 27:01.000]  Don't miss it.
[27:01.000 --> 27:06.000]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[27:06.000 --> 27:11.000]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets.
[27:11.000 --> 27:14.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details.
[27:42.000 --> 27:51.000]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information.
[27:51.000 --> 27:53.000]  But what happens if it escapes their control?
[27:53.000 --> 27:55.000]  It's not an idle question.
[27:55.000 --> 28:03.000]  According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year.
[28:03.000 --> 28:07.000]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com.
[28:07.000 --> 28:11.000]  Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you.
[28:11.000 --> 28:15.000]  They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see.
[28:15.000 --> 28:17.000]  The cupboard would be bare.
[28:17.000 --> 28:20.000]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[28:20.000 --> 28:25.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[28:30.000 --> 28:31.000]  I lost my son.
[28:31.000 --> 28:32.000]  My nephew.
[28:32.000 --> 28:33.000]  My uncle.
[28:33.000 --> 28:34.000]  My son.
[28:34.000 --> 28:35.000]  On September 11, 2001.
[28:35.000 --> 28:38.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[28:38.000 --> 28:43.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[28:43.000 --> 28:46.000]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[28:46.000 --> 28:52.000]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[28:52.000 --> 28:54.000]  Bring justice to my son.
[28:54.000 --> 28:55.000]  My uncle.
[28:55.000 --> 28:56.000]  My nephew.
[28:56.000 --> 28:57.000]  My son.
[28:57.000 --> 28:58.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[28:58.000 --> 29:00.000]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[29:01.000 --> 29:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[29:05.000 --> 29:12.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[29:12.000 --> 29:19.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[29:19.000 --> 29:25.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[29:25.000 --> 29:35.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[29:35.000 --> 29:40.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[29:40.000 --> 29:50.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[29:50.000 --> 29:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[29:54.000 --> 30:00.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[30:20.000 --> 30:23.000]  I want you to follow the law of the land.
[30:23.000 --> 30:26.000]  I don't understand.
[30:26.000 --> 30:29.000]  Your job is to protect and to serve.
[30:29.000 --> 30:32.000]  Not beat and abuse.
[30:32.000 --> 30:34.000]  Happy, sir!
[30:34.000 --> 30:56.000]  When you're gonna stop abuse, your power.
[30:56.000 --> 31:02.000]  So please, Mr. Macklin, teach officers not to abuse their power.
[31:02.000 --> 31:07.000]  Send a request to the leader, the competent of all officers.
[31:07.000 --> 31:12.000]  Tell them to uphold the law, and please don't abuse their power.
[31:12.000 --> 31:18.000]  They beat and they beat and they cheat and they cheat and they lie every hour.
[31:18.000 --> 31:21.000]  So, Mr. Officer, please don't abuse their power.
[31:21.000 --> 31:23.000]  Okay, we are back.
[31:23.000 --> 31:25.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio.
[31:25.000 --> 31:38.000]  And when it went out, I'm struggling with a methodology that you and I can use to bring the system to task.
[31:38.000 --> 31:40.000]  We got Trump in it.
[31:40.000 --> 31:46.000]  Trump is going through the deep state like a bull in a china shop.
[31:46.000 --> 31:49.000]  He is stirring everything up.
[31:49.000 --> 31:52.000]  This is an opportunity for us.
[31:52.000 --> 32:01.000]  So I'm going to the U.S. attorney in D.C., going to the attorney general.
[32:01.000 --> 32:10.000]  And the purpose of me filing these complaints, I filed them against the Fifth Circuit judges.
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  The Fifth Circuit, that's the next thing to the Supreme.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Nobody ever goes after them criminally.
[32:16.000 --> 32:19.000]  So I'm filing criminal charges against them.
[32:19.000 --> 32:21.000]  So this is...
[32:21.000 --> 32:23.000]  I have.
[32:23.000 --> 32:25.000]  I mean, nobody except us.
[32:25.000 --> 32:27.000]  Have you filed criminally against them?
[32:27.000 --> 32:29.000]  Oh, yes.
[32:29.000 --> 32:31.000]  Oh, I need to see that.
[32:31.000 --> 32:39.000]  That was several years ago when they were trying to railroad me for a traffic ticket, but they never commenced the case.
[32:39.000 --> 32:42.000]  Okay, I need to see that.
[32:42.000 --> 32:51.000]  I want us both to go to D.C. and talk to the attorney general and say, look, we have a problem.
[32:51.000 --> 33:06.000]  The problem is, is that the citizens of the state of Texas have been disenfranchised from the governmental instruments they have created in violation of...
[33:06.000 --> 33:07.000]  Absolutely.
[33:07.000 --> 33:09.000]  Article 1, section...
[33:09.000 --> 33:11.000]  Is it 19?
[33:11.000 --> 33:13.000]  29.
[33:13.000 --> 33:15.000]  And significantly.
[33:15.000 --> 33:18.000]  Which one says that the...
[33:18.000 --> 33:28.000]  I think 19 is the one that says that the rights included in this section shall be held in violate in perpetuity.
[33:28.000 --> 33:34.000]  And I think it's 29 says that the public shall not be disenfranchised.
[33:34.000 --> 33:35.000]  Yeah, you got...
[33:35.000 --> 33:37.000]  The disfranchised is 19.
[33:37.000 --> 33:40.000]  Okay, I keep getting those switched around.
[33:40.000 --> 33:43.000]  Okay, 19 says we shall not be disenfranchised.
[33:43.000 --> 34:01.000]  And I'm arguing that by disenfranchising the public from the governmental instruments they've created, that has the effect of converting the republic into a democracy.
[34:01.000 --> 34:11.000]  And the Constitution commands that the states provide the citizens with a republican form of government.
[34:11.000 --> 34:13.000]  That's the argument I want to bring.
[34:13.000 --> 34:17.000]  I don't know if it's much of an argument, but I love the sound bite.
[34:17.000 --> 34:22.000]  I love the way it has kind of a shock factor because everybody would think, what?
[34:22.000 --> 34:25.000]  Changing our government, type of government, what?
[34:25.000 --> 34:30.000]  And it's kind of shocking to think about, but I don't know if it'll hold water.
[34:30.000 --> 34:32.000]  But it will get them to think about it.
[34:32.000 --> 34:39.000]  What is the difference between seeing a republic?
[34:39.000 --> 34:47.000]  I see a big architectural difference with representation, elected representatives.
[34:47.000 --> 34:51.000]  Elect representatives in a democracy?
[34:51.000 --> 34:57.000]  I don't know, because then that wouldn't be by the people anymore.
[34:57.000 --> 34:59.000]  Yeah, we elect them.
[34:59.000 --> 35:04.000]  We would elect them the same way in a democracy as we do in a republic.
[35:04.000 --> 35:14.000]  The only difference between a republic and a democracy is that in a democracy, all rights flow from the people.
[35:14.000 --> 35:17.000]  If the people want your property, they can take your property.
[35:17.000 --> 35:21.000]  If they want your life, they can vote and take your life.
[35:21.000 --> 35:28.000]  In a republic, all rights flow from the individual.
[35:28.000 --> 35:35.000]  The public cannot vote to take your property just because they want to.
[35:35.000 --> 35:41.000]  If the law says they can't do it, they can't change it.
[35:41.000 --> 35:44.000]  All rights flow from the individual.
[35:44.000 --> 35:49.000]  So I have a right to do anything I want to.
[35:49.000 --> 35:54.000]  For example, report crime, even if that criminal is a public official.
[35:54.000 --> 35:58.000]  We all, well, lots of us have been doing that.
[35:58.000 --> 36:01.000]  And yeah, it has some kind of an effect.
[36:01.000 --> 36:10.000]  But the person never ends up being indicted or dragged up in front of a grand jury and had to stand and answer for it.
[36:10.000 --> 36:15.000]  They just call each other and and wink, wink, nod, nod.
[36:15.000 --> 36:18.000]  And yeah, maybe somebody got embarrassed.
[36:18.000 --> 36:23.000]  But that makes that makes this a democracy.
[36:23.000 --> 36:32.000]  The federal laws concerning U.S. attorneys, they direct all complaints to U.S. attorneys.
[36:32.000 --> 36:37.000]  But that direction cannot apply to me.
[36:37.000 --> 36:40.000]  Because I'm a citizen of the republic.
[36:40.000 --> 36:43.000]  Right. That's a federal thing.
[36:43.000 --> 36:48.000]  It's for federal employees and federal representatives of any kind.
[36:48.000 --> 36:53.000]  Every federal agent who has a criminal complaint, they have to give it to the attorney general.
[36:53.000 --> 36:54.000]  Right on.
[36:54.000 --> 36:56.000]  I don't.
[36:56.000 --> 37:11.000]  The grand jury, they had their their duty to jammin into all crimes that come to their knowledge by way of any member of the grand jury or the U.S. attorney.
[37:11.000 --> 37:21.000]  Well, there is nothing in law saying that a citizen cannot give notice of crime to a grand jury member.
[37:21.000 --> 37:22.000]  It's not in there.
[37:22.000 --> 37:23.000]  Yeah.
[37:23.000 --> 37:35.000]  And in fact, it's it seems like you shouldn't have to say it when you read that the oath of the grand jury is to inquire into the what they find out about by any means, including any credible person.
[37:35.000 --> 37:41.000]  So I'm a citizen in a republic, not a democracy.
[37:41.000 --> 37:49.000]  As a citizen in a republic, anything that I am not specifically forbidden to do.
[37:49.000 --> 37:52.000]  I may do.
[37:52.000 --> 38:02.000]  So my argument is I want the names of all the grand jury members so I can give them notice of crime.
[38:02.000 --> 38:05.000]  And I want the U.S. attorney to tell me I can't get those.
[38:05.000 --> 38:07.000]  Then I file against the grand jury.
[38:07.000 --> 38:09.000]  So here I'm trying to bypass that.
[38:09.000 --> 38:11.000]  Just go straight to the U.S. attorney.
[38:11.000 --> 38:13.000]  We got a new attorney general.
[38:13.000 --> 38:25.000]  And I'm hoping that I can show the grand the new attorney general a minor tweak that she can make.
[38:25.000 --> 38:30.000]  That will dramatically change the underlying system.
[38:30.000 --> 38:33.000]  And that tweak is.
[38:33.000 --> 38:38.000]  If a person is arrested for any reason with or without a warrant.
[38:39.000 --> 38:42.000]  They are to be taken directly to the nearest magistrate.
[38:42.000 --> 38:47.000]  And they can be taken to that magistrate by electronic means.
[38:47.000 --> 38:48.000]  Exactly.
[38:48.000 --> 38:49.000]  That's what it says.
[38:49.000 --> 38:51.000]  It's already there.
[38:51.000 --> 38:53.000]  Change any law.
[38:53.000 --> 38:54.000]  Exactly.
[38:54.000 --> 39:02.000]  If so, the whole point of this complaint that I'm filing is to get their attention.
[39:02.000 --> 39:06.000]  And give them the idea that there is a big problem.
[39:06.000 --> 39:09.000]  A problem that nobody really noticed.
[39:09.000 --> 39:13.000]  And the cure is just a minor tiny little change.
[39:13.000 --> 39:19.000]  That will eliminate this mass incarceration BS.
[39:19.000 --> 39:26.000]  And if you're worried about the government getting out of control the way it is.
[39:26.000 --> 39:34.000]  Ask the grand jury to sit at least one time a month to hear complaints by private citizens.
[39:35.000 --> 39:38.000]  All the garbage that's going on.
[39:38.000 --> 39:42.000]  Somebody out here knows about it.
[39:42.000 --> 39:46.000]  And if you open the grand jury to the general public.
[39:46.000 --> 39:52.000]  Whether the general public comes to the grand jury or not is not relevant.
[39:52.000 --> 39:58.000]  Those public officials who would act in violation of law.
[39:58.000 --> 40:02.000]  They have to consider somebody's going to know I'm doing this.
[40:02.000 --> 40:04.000]  Maybe my secretary.
[40:04.000 --> 40:07.000]  Or the janitor in the building.
[40:07.000 --> 40:13.000]  And they can go directly to the grand jury and report this.
[40:13.000 --> 40:14.000]  Yes.
[40:14.000 --> 40:17.000]  No way I can cover all of this.
[40:17.000 --> 40:26.000]  And the vast majority of all the crap that we're dealing with will simply go away.
[40:26.000 --> 40:30.000]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[40:30.000 --> 40:34.000]  When we come back on the other side we have Tina.
[40:34.000 --> 40:36.000]  I just made a mistake Tina.
[40:36.000 --> 40:41.000]  And I said that you were referenced by T-I-N-A instead of T-E-N-A.
[40:41.000 --> 40:44.000]  I'm going to have to go back and fix that.
[40:44.000 --> 40:47.000]  We will go to you when we come back.
[40:47.000 --> 40:49.000]  This is Randy Kelton.
[40:49.000 --> 40:50.000]  Brett Fountain.
[40:50.000 --> 40:51.000]  Ruevla Radio.
[40:51.000 --> 40:53.000]  And I see Mark in Florida.
[40:53.000 --> 40:57.000]  Years ago we had a disbarred attorney named Mark in Florida.
[40:58.000 --> 41:03.000]  Do you have a business with five employees or more?
[41:03.000 --> 41:07.000]  How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes?
[41:07.000 --> 41:11.000]  Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[41:11.000 --> 41:18.000]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the claims cost?
[41:18.000 --> 41:33.000]  The CHANT Plan is a Section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero co-pay.
[41:33.000 --> 41:39.000]  If you are an employee you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes.
[41:39.000 --> 41:45.000]  As an employer you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes.
[41:45.000 --> 41:51.000]  The CHANT Plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit.
[41:51.000 --> 42:00.000]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[42:00.000 --> 42:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[42:03.000 --> 42:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[42:07.000 --> 42:15.000]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[42:15.000 --> 42:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[42:19.000 --> 42:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[42:23.000 --> 42:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[42:28.000 --> 42:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[42:34.000 --> 42:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[42:43.000 --> 42:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[42:52.000 --> 43:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[43:04.000 --> 43:20.000]  If you did not have any problem, where are you going to look for one?
[43:20.000 --> 43:26.000]  If you could not wage any battle, would your purpose has been done?
[43:26.000 --> 43:32.000]  Such a staff commander, soldier, or warrior of love, scuffle and they keep the peace.
[43:32.000 --> 43:37.000]  All they're taking is a misunderstanding and somebody calls the police.
[43:37.000 --> 44:01.000]  Watching the sparks fly.
[44:01.000 --> 44:23.000]  Okay, we are back.
[44:23.000 --> 44:26.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[44:26.000 --> 44:37.000]  And it didn't mean to use up the whole show, but I think we are in the right place at the right time in history.
[44:37.000 --> 45:03.000]  Where just some ordinary people, because of the sensitivity of the politics at the moment, that if we're careful, smart about what we're doing, we can introduce some ideas that these guys can pick up and change everything.
[45:03.000 --> 45:10.000]  If we do that, the likelihood is that nobody will ever know we did it.
[45:10.000 --> 45:14.000]  But that makes it even better.
[45:14.000 --> 45:20.000]  I live in a town that used to lose about 40 people a year to rock trucks.
[45:20.000 --> 45:31.000]  I took a presentation in 1985 to the president of the Katy Railroad, just crawled down his throat, chewed him out big time.
[45:31.000 --> 45:38.000]  Six months later, they were out rebuilding the rails for this rail line through our town.
[45:38.000 --> 45:45.000]  A year later, one of my clients called me to clean up a couple of his trucks so he could sell them. He had 12, he's down to two.
[45:45.000 --> 45:52.000]  And I said, Virgil, with this recession, this is 85, must not be much rock moving.
[45:52.000 --> 45:59.000]  He said, plenty of rock moving, goddamn railroads hauling it all.
[46:00.000 --> 46:11.000]  We lost 24 people a year at one intersection. All of that is gone.
[46:11.000 --> 46:18.000]  I did that, and nobody knows I did it, because Gassler's dead.
[46:18.000 --> 46:33.000]  But I get to pull up to that railroad, and the arms come down, and I sit there, and gondola after gondola after gondola of rock cruises across on the railroad.
[46:33.000 --> 46:37.000]  There is nothing better than that.
[46:37.000 --> 46:55.000]  And I think with what Brett and I and you guys have been doing, and with the political situation that exists now, the window to this opportunity is open.
[46:55.000 --> 47:03.000]  After I've been at this for almost 40 years. After all this time, the window is open.
[47:03.000 --> 47:13.000]  And if we do our job right, we can insert this minor little adjustment that could have the effect of changing everything.
[47:13.000 --> 47:28.000]  Okay, I'm going to shut up now, and I'm going to go to Miss Tina, Miss Sweet Tina, not to be confused with the churlish Tina that sometimes gets referenced on this show.
[47:28.000 --> 47:34.000]  No, this is not that Tina. This is Sweet Tina. Hello, Sweet Tina.
[47:34.000 --> 47:38.000]  Because I'm not the churlish Tina, you know that.
[47:38.000 --> 47:46.000]  Absolutely not. I don't know who would even think such a thing. Brett, is that you?
[47:46.000 --> 47:51.000]  No, definitely not.
[47:51.000 --> 48:02.000]  Okay, what do you have for us? Okay, for everybody out there, Tina is absolutely a sweetheart.
[48:02.000 --> 48:10.000]  I'm not a sweetheart to the bank. They don't think I'm a sweetheart, but that's okay. I don't care.
[48:10.000 --> 48:20.000]  Okay, I'm only saying that because the one thing I do not want is for Tina to come after me.
[48:20.000 --> 48:24.000]  No, you don't. Okay.
[48:24.000 --> 48:37.000]  And I did send you a copy of my motion to bar the debtors from future bankruptcies. And I don't know if you've had a chance to read it, but I would love to get your feed back on it.
[48:37.000 --> 48:49.000]  I saw it, but I was writing this document that I just put it on the Telegram channel to have everybody rip it apart for me.
[48:49.000 --> 49:00.000]  I was crafting this complaint I was filing to the new attorney general, so I didn't get a chance to read it yet, but it's on my agenda for in the morning.
[49:00.000 --> 49:12.000]  Well, I hope so. I'd like you to critique it and do whatever. We have a hearing scheduled for March the 6th, and we'll see what happens.
[49:12.000 --> 49:27.000]  Tina is coming on my show asking me to critique her work. I read her documents and I think I would that I could craft such well-structured documents.
[49:27.000 --> 49:38.000]  Yeah, now you're being too kind. But I did have a friend and neighbor said, Tina, you should be an attorney. I've never seen anything like this. This is really great.
[49:38.000 --> 49:45.000]  I would like you as my attorney, which is a very flattering, nice statement, but I have a huge amount to learn.
[49:45.000 --> 50:00.000]  But my question today is, you know, I think I've brought it up before. I have a UPS mailbox because it's a street address.
[50:00.000 --> 50:14.000]  And ever since in 2016, I got this disgusting, horrendous letter delivered to where my partner has his home and I live.
[50:14.000 --> 50:27.000]  And it was so horrible. I mean, it's not something I can post anywhere. It's that bad. And I took my name off everything related to that address.
[50:27.000 --> 50:38.000]  Hold on, hold on. Step back. Was this letter from a private person or a government agency?
[50:38.000 --> 50:48.000]  It was from a private person who was too cowardly to sign their name, but the address on the end.
[50:48.000 --> 51:05.000]  Are you sure it's not one of these people who, like I just recently had someone come on and say, yeah, I broke into your account and I know where you've been going on the Internet.
[51:05.000 --> 51:12.000]  And if you don't pay me a whole bunch of money, it could be one of those.
[51:12.000 --> 51:28.000]  This was because it came out at the time that I had voted for President Trump and they sent this most disgusting letter from ostensibly from a crematorium in Florida.
[51:28.000 --> 51:43.000]  They hoped that I would need the services of a crematorium soon in California and they would come and, well, I can say they could piss on my grave.
[51:43.000 --> 51:50.000]  But they was much, much worse than that. And so from then on, I took everything from.
[51:50.000 --> 51:58.000]  Have you have you filed a complaint with the U.S. Mail?
[51:58.000 --> 52:04.000]  Well, no, not with the U.S. Mail, actually. That's a good point. I filed a complaint with the local police.
[52:04.000 --> 52:15.000]  I filed a complaint with the police from the state in Florida and they didn't want to do anything unless I wanted to come to fly to Florida and file my complaint in person.
[52:15.000 --> 52:18.000]  They wouldn't take it on mail. Well, you know, anyway.
[52:18.000 --> 52:26.000]  Hold on, take a step back. This occurred in this is letter is from Florida.
[52:26.000 --> 52:31.000]  From a crematorium in Florida.
[52:31.000 --> 52:36.000]  What? Wait, from a what in Florida?
[52:36.000 --> 52:39.000]  Crematorium.
[52:39.000 --> 52:41.000]  Crematorium.
[52:41.000 --> 52:43.000]  Yeah.
[52:43.000 --> 52:48.000]  Have you checked to see if the crematorium actually exists?
[52:48.000 --> 52:53.000]  Yes, I did. I tried to contact them and they didn't want to anything. Do you know anything about it?
[52:53.000 --> 53:02.000]  No, no, no, I'm not talking about contacting them. But does that is that a valid real address?
[53:02.000 --> 53:04.000]  Yes.
[53:04.000 --> 53:13.000]  Have you OK, so have you filed complaints in Florida against the crematorium?
[53:13.000 --> 53:22.000]  The reason I'm saying it this way is it that crematorium may or may not know something about this.
[53:22.000 --> 53:33.000]  I spoke to the crematorium, sent them an email and they didn't want to have anything to do with it because they said they had no knowledge of who might have sent that on their letter.
[53:33.000 --> 53:40.000]  Good. OK, so good, good, good, good. So the crematorium knows about it.
[53:40.000 --> 53:42.000]  Oh, it's on their letterhead.
[53:42.000 --> 53:56.000]  It's on their, but then that's not doesn't mean much. If I get a letterhead, I can pull up a gimp and reproduce that later head in about 10 minutes.
[53:57.000 --> 54:02.000]  Yeah, and somebody like me can detect whether that's a real one or if it's been reproduced.
[54:02.000 --> 54:07.000]  Yeah, so can you OK?
[54:07.000 --> 54:08.000]  Copy of it.
[54:08.000 --> 54:14.000]  I know I'm interrupting you. I'm going to shut up now and let you finish.
[54:14.000 --> 54:18.000]  Well, until I understand what's really going on here.
[54:18.000 --> 54:26.000]  OK, well, ever since that happened, I took my name off my partner's address. I took everything.
[54:27.000 --> 54:32.000]  You know, I just deleted everything related to his address and I got my way.
[54:32.000 --> 54:35.000]  Well, I said I've shut up. I'm not.
[54:35.000 --> 54:43.000]  Do you have any reason? Do you have any idea what motivated this?
[54:43.000 --> 54:53.000]  The fact that it came out on the Internet because I was interviewed by CNN about the fact that I had voted for Trump.
[54:53.000 --> 54:59.000]  And did I regret that? Because his Treasury Secretary was the one that foreclosed on my house.
[54:59.000 --> 55:03.000]  Wait a minute. You were interviewed by CNN?
[55:03.000 --> 55:05.000]  By CNN, yes.
[55:05.000 --> 55:09.000]  You're famous.
[55:09.000 --> 55:12.000]  Oh, my goodness.
[55:12.000 --> 55:16.000]  And you're trying to run me up the cliff and I'm not going to let you do it.
[55:16.000 --> 55:26.000]  We're doing this Chomp radio show here in Poton, Texas, and we're talking to the famous Tina.
[55:26.000 --> 55:36.000]  So, OK, that is interesting. You were interviewed on CNN and then subsequently you got hate mail.
[55:36.000 --> 55:39.000]  Oh, terrible hate mail. Yeah.
[55:39.000 --> 55:47.000]  That's probably a 16-year-old in Cincinnati, Ohio. Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain. We'll be right back.
[56:06.000 --> 56:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[56:09.000 --> 56:18.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[56:18.000 --> 56:28.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[56:28.000 --> 56:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[56:33.000 --> 56:48.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[56:48.000 --> 56:53.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[56:53.000 --> 57:02.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[57:02.000 --> 57:11.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it.
[57:11.000 --> 57:17.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[57:17.000 --> 57:27.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[57:27.000 --> 57:35.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[57:35.000 --> 57:46.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with Startpage.
[57:46.000 --> 57:55.000]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. They pull back the covers and find a third party there. He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[57:55.000 --> 58:00.000]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent.
[58:00.000 --> 58:09.000]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. Third party, Third Amendment? Get it?
[58:09.000 --> 58:17.000]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[58:17.000 --> 58:21.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[58:25.000 --> 58:40.000]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our liberty depends on it.
[58:40.000 --> 58:46.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights.
[58:46.000 --> 58:56.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[58:56.000 --> 59:04.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[59:04.000 --> 59:14.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[59:16.000 --> 59:27.000]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles. That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.
[59:27.000 --> 59:39.000]  Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it? Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of security. Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[59:39.000 --> 59:46.000]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[59:46.000 --> 59:53.000]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[59:53.000 --> 59:58.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:00:39.000 --> 01:01:06.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Calton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio on this, the 30th day of January 2025.
[01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:26.000]  Holy mackerel, can this be 2025? I remember sitting in school imagining what it was, I was in first year of high school and we read 1984.
[01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:43.000]  This was 1963. And I remember imagining what things would actually be like in 21 years.
[01:01:43.000 --> 01:02:10.000]  Am I older? What? Here I am. What? 45 years later? 40 years later? Wow. Okay. Okay. We're talking to Tina. Tina, you remember that, don't you?
[01:02:10.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  Oops, oops, no Tina's not that old. Do you remember wondering what the world would be like in 1984?
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:40.000]  I actually don't remember that, but I do remember just being in total awe of the landing on the moon. I am not sure when I first heard about all this.
[01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:59.000]  August 29th, 1969. I was in the Air Force stationed in Homestead, Florida at an Air Force base that does not exist anymore.
[01:02:59.000 --> 01:03:17.000]  I was at a friend of mine's house whose father owned a chicken farm and we stood watching a black and white TV of the moon landing.
[01:03:17.000 --> 01:03:28.000]  Tina, can we be this old? Unfortunately, we can't. I don't know how we got this old, but it's scary.
[01:03:28.000 --> 01:03:41.000]  It's fascinating. And that's what Brett and I were talking about. You had somebody send you an outrageous, was it a letter? Was it a direct letter?
[01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:54.000]  It was a letter. It was a letter. I will send a copy to you and Brett. I cannot put it on Telegram. It is that bad.
[01:03:54.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  It's not something you can, you would want your mother to see, your sister.
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:17.000]  Okay, think about that, Tina. Something is that bad? I will almost guarantee you it was written by a 15 or 16-year-old.
[01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:21.000]  Was it written by a Democrat?
[01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:40.000]  As we get older, we learn what works and what doesn't. When we were 14, 15, 16, especially guys, we get 13.
[01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:50.000]  Our testicles tend to drop. We start growing hair where we didn't have hair before, and our body starts getting filled with testosterone.
[01:04:50.000 --> 01:05:00.000]  And we begin to feel our machismo, but nobody else notices our machismo.
[01:05:00.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  And we try to find these ways to prove to ourselves that we are big, bad, and carnivorous man killers.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:25.000]  We start doing stuff to prove to everybody else that we are the alpha male, but we're not very good at it.
[01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:41.000]  So we do really outrageous stuff. Anytime I get something that's really outrageous, even if you're a psychopath, if you're a really crazed wacko,
[01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  you know better than to do this really, really outrageous stuff because it's not effective.
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  I haven't seen the document. I'd like you to send it to me, and I will do an analysis on it.
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  I have some skill in that regard. But from what you've told me, I'm going to almost guarantee you this is some young person who heard this and was impressed by your sophistication
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:19.000]  and used you to prove to themselves that they were as sophisticated as you are.
[01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:32.000]  But they're just like one of those old movies where you see the antagonist come jump into the scene, dramatically waving two swords, flashing and yelling and flipping.
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:43.000]  And the protagonist just pulls out a pistol and calmly dispatches the problem.
[01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  You know, that scene in Indiana Jones, he just pulled that out of his behind. That wasn't in the script.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:07:01.000]  They did that scene with Indiana Jones. This guy jumps in front of him with a sword and he's doing all this stuff with it.
[01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:10.000]  Indiana Jones pulls out a pistol and shoots him. That was not in the script, but it worked so well they left it in.
[01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:18.000]  He was just screwing around. But yeah, that's exactly with what you've told me. That's what I'm seeing.
[01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:28.000]  Well, I will send it to you and let you guys decide. But after that happened, I literally took every scrap mail.
[01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  I just deleted everything from this particular address, and I actually hadn't used this address for the prior two years.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  So I don't know why they got that, because I'd used a UPS mailbox. But I've happily used that UPS mailbox for two years.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  And recently, I was going to be denied the use of this UPS mailbox because I refused to give them an address where I lay my head at night.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:16.000]  Wait a minute. Brett, can you hear that? I can hear it, but I can't quite make out what she's saying. You're not using your hands free, are you?
[01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:18.000]  No, no.
[01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  Oh, that was a stupid question. I should never ask Tina such a question. She would never do such a thing.
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  But something is not right with your audio. It's kind of fading a little bit.
[01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  You know, if these cell phones, they're just really wonderful. When they work, they grow. When they don't work, they're just horrible.
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  And there's nothing I can really do about it.
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  Move this cell phone a little farther from your mouth.
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  I've put it on the speakerphone, and let's see if that works and move it a little further.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  So I was happily using this UPS address. No problem.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:19.000]  Everything went there until recently when I was told that that privilege will be taken from me if I refuse to sign a form that gives an address where I physically lay my head at night.
[01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  And I have to produce a, because my driver's license has the UPS mailbox address, which is the street address, and I have to give proof of where I literally live.
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:09:56.000]  And it has to take the form of a vehicle registration, vehicle insurance, a lease, a utility bill, or something like that.
[01:09:56.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  It is not my car that I drive. It is my partner's car.
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  Okay, I'm not, I'm not the right guy for this, but.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:11.000]  I have some suggestions for you. I've been through a lot of that. I have some suggestions for you.
[01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:19.000]  We could probably do best to kind of work through it together after the show.
[01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  Yeah, we'd probably better do that. I've known people that know how to do this, but I'm not one of them.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  Tina, would you be willing to call us back right after the show?
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:46.000]  Well, it can. I just want to let people know one of the things they say is this is voluntary. Supplying the information is voluntary, but it's not provided.
[01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  We will not be able to fulfill your request for delivery of mail through an agent.
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:03.000]  We do not disclose our information under the consent of the third party, but if it's voluntary,
[01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  but they didn't give me the right to get it if I don't do it, it's not voluntary, right?
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  Yeah, I'm correct. We're making it a condition of service.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:22.000]  But if it's a private company, they can do that.
[01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:26.000]  In my experience, these private companies don't want to do that.
[01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:34.000]  The private companies are being told by USPS that they are forced to do that and they have no choice in the matter.
[01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  And they get shown some sort of a publication, whatever number 921 something from the USPS telling them that this is now mandatory.
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:56.000]  You're a private mailbox handler. This is what you must do is collect blah, blah, blah from all of your people.
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:12:16.000]  And Tina understand that part of the reason they do this is to keep people from being able to send other people letters like the one you got that was so threatening and intimidating.
[01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:20.000]  They want to be able to track this letter back to a source.
[01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:26.000]  They don't want someone to be able to act with absolute impunity.
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  They're telling me is that they are concerned about people doing criminal and illegal activity that they want to track.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:56.000]  Well, you could get a subpoena to check whatever comes in my mail and have literally 30 days to do this, to figure this out, to be able to keep this.
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  Okay. If you need an address to give them, give them my address.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:04.000]  Okay.
[01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  P.O. Box one.
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:10.000]  P.O. Box one, Boyd, Texas.
[01:13:10.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  No, I have to make a lease. I have to have a valid lease to do that.
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:18.000]  A valid lease?
[01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:21.000]  Like I said, I've got some suggestions for you.
[01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:24.000]  Go ahead, Britt.
[01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  Oh no, wait, wait, wait.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:28.000]  I don't know if it should go out on here.
[01:13:28.000 --> 01:13:30.000]  Okay.
[01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:33.000]  Tina, will you call us after the show?
[01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:35.000]  Yes, I certainly will.
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  You know my number. You call me. I'll patch Brett in and we can do this after the show.
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  Sounds good. Okay. I'll talk to you later.
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  Okay. Thank you, Tina.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:57.000]  Okay, we're about to go to our sponsors. When we come back, we'll go to Mark and Florida, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:32.000]  We're in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[01:14:32.000 --> 01:14:39.000]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development.
[01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:50.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:15:00.000]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:27.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:49.000]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[01:15:49.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:26.000]  Ain't gonna blind me, don't bore me
[01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  Well, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  I was blindsided, but now I can see your plan
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hand
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:17:11.000]  Ain't gonna fool me
[01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:16.000]  Ain't gonna drive me with that same old sucker punch
[01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  I get it now, but then I must have been out of touch
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:26.000]  Back then you had room to move, but now you're feeling the crunch
[01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  Ain't gonna get me with that same old sucker punch
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton from Rule of Law Radio and we're going to Mark in Florida. Mark, what do you have for us today?
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:04.000]  Hi there. Been a while since I've been on the show.
[01:18:04.000 --> 01:18:12.000]  Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait. Been a while since you've been on the show. Are you a disbarred lawyer?
[01:18:12.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  I am not a lawyer.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  Okay, we had a disbarred lawyer who used to call into our show, oh, ten years ago.
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  And he was a hoot, but I think he might have got his license back and he dropped us like a hot rock.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:36.000]  Okay, you've called us before.
[01:18:36.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  Okay, what do you have for us today?
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:49.000]  It's a labor case. I live in Florida, but this case is taking place in, lucky me, New York's federal court.
[01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Oh, lucky you.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:54.000]  Wow.
[01:18:54.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  You're in a red state in a case in a blue, and I definitely remember you, yeah.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:09.000]  So I lost, unsurprisingly, I lost my labor case in the lower court, the district court.
[01:19:09.000 --> 01:19:20.000]  The judge dismissed all my claims saying that they were preempted by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act,
[01:19:20.000 --> 01:19:28.000]  which is one of three areas of federal law that supposedly preempt state law.
[01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  So if the claim is, I raised my claims in state court, the defendant had the ability to remove my case to federal court,
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:45.000]  saying that my claims are preempted.
[01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  The judge unsurprisingly agreed with them and dismissed everything on a 12b6 motion to dismiss.
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  Okay, that was round one.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:20:08.000]  Now I appealed over the summer. I submitted my appeal brief in October, and I got the descendant brief,
[01:20:08.000 --> 01:20:21.000]  there are two sets of dependents, I got their brief a week ago, and I'm writing seriously, I'm writing my reply brief seriously.
[01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  I have two more weeks.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  But I had a couple of questions for you guys because there were a couple of things that came up in the defendant's brief,
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  and I just wanted to check them with you guys.
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  One thing they said is that, so I relinquished two of my claims on the appeal, not in the lower court, but on the appeal,
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  that conferred federal jurisdiction. They were federal questions that clearly conferred federal jurisdiction,
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  and they weren't working anyway, so I didn't appeal them, and I stated in my brief, my opening brief, that I was relinquishing those claims.
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  The defendants in their brief, and so I'm also challenging remand because I'm saying the lower court,
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:28.000]  like the court doesn't have jurisdiction anymore, so that my case should be sent back down to the district court and then remanded to state court.
[01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  But the defendants are saying, wait a minute, you can't do that because the federal court had jurisdiction when it was removed,
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:51.000]  and they had federal jurisdiction when the notice of appeal was filed because these claims that I'm relinquishing on appeal,
[01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  they were in my amended complaint in the lower court.
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:22:01.000]  Wait a minute, Brett, are you able to keep up with this?
[01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  I think he's saying, there's a lot of pieces, but I'm gathering that when he has relinquished some of the claims,
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  he's hoping that would have been able to make it simpler where it can go back to a state court.
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  Correct.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  And they're saying, no, it can't because we already had jurisdiction, so even though you relinquish claims,
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:30.000]  we're not going to let you send it back to state court.
[01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  That's what I'm gathering.
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  Correct.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:36.000]  That's exactly it.
[01:22:36.000 --> 01:22:48.000]  So I'm wondering, all my claims are New York state tort claims against individuals.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  Should I try to, I don't even, it's fine with me if the lower court is forced to redo this claim, if it gets sent back down,
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:11.000]  if the appeals court finds that my claims can still withstand preemption, I'm okay with the federal court evaluating them.
[01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  That's not really the issue.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  But do I even attempt to argue that remand to state court is still proper?
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:33.000]  Like I just in left field on this one.
[01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:36.000]  Brett, you'll have to address this. I'm lost.
[01:23:36.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  I couldn't catch that part.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:49.000]  You know, based on what the defendants are saying, is there any hope for me to remand this to state court?
[01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  Or should I simply, in my reply, just say basically, oh, that's fine.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:01.000]  The district court has jurisdiction, send it back down to the jurisdiction, to the district court,
[01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:14.000]  and have them remove the section 301, 12B6, overcome the 12B6, adjudicate my claims, my tort claims.
[01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:19.000]  Hold on, 12B6?
[01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  For the claims he's relinquishing, so that he can get the other claims addressed.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  Okay.
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:33.000]  Maybe it's just me, but I'm lost.
[01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:37.000]  Go ahead, Brett's not lost. I'm completely lost at the moment.
[01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:40.000]  Well, I think I understand what he's asking, but I'm not sure I know the answer.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  I don't know of a good reason for it to be.
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  So what I understand he's asking is, should I care about trying to bring it back to state or just let the feds handle it?
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  And I don't see any reason not to let the feds handle it.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  They're allowed to.
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  So then he's saying, with the bringing it back from the higher court, the appellate court, down to the district court again, in the feds still,
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  he would be able to have fewer claims and the claims that were supposedly had 12B6 as an obstacle no longer.
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  That's the ones he's relinquishing.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:35.000]  So then the ones that are left are the ones that would get adjudicated.
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:44.000]  And that's what he's wondering. Should he leave that to the feds or should he at that point try to get it to come back to the state?
[01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:51.000]  Well, I doubt that it makes much difference what court you're in.
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  If it's in a fed court and it's state issues that are attached to federal issues, then the state can rule on the federal issues.
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  So who's ruling on it may not. I don't know.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:16.000]  Another idea came to me in his description of this.
[01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:24.000]  Is there any downside to just non-suit the, like relinquish all of the claims and then start fresh?
[01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:32.000]  Because if he starts fresh, then there hasn't been a, it wouldn't be double jeopardy, right?
[01:26:32.000 --> 01:26:36.000]  Because they haven't really adjudicated those claims.
[01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  And he would be able to just, he's going after a few people in their personal capacity, I think.
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  It's a few tort claims. So it wouldn't, I don't know if that's an option to consider or not.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:27:00.000]  All right. We're going to go to our sponsors. Hold that thought.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  The list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing.
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:48.000]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:27:48.000 --> 01:27:52.000]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart.
[01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:56.000]  But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:27:56.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons,
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:04.000]  which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed-out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  So take a deep breath and chill out. It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:26.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:53.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:28:53.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:26.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:29:26.000 --> 01:29:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:08.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  Thank you for listening.
[01:30:38.000 --> 01:30:40.000]  Thank you for listening.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:19.000]  Okay, we are back, ready to kill, Red Front, Rule of Law Radio, and we are talking to Mark in Florida.
[01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  Okay, Mark, I am lost.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:29.000]  It's complicated.
[01:31:29.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  Preemption is really complicated.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:45.000]  But it's okay, because I think I know what's going on, and I think it's okay if I can just get my claims, my other claims, reversed by the opinion.
[01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  Okay, wait, wait, wait.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  Explain to everybody preemption.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:32:13.000]  So there are three areas of law where federal law basically says if a state law does the same thing as this certain federal law, then the federal law controls.
[01:32:13.000 --> 01:32:20.000]  And these three areas are labor law, ERISA, employee retirement income, blah, blah, blah.
[01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  I can never remember all of it.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:26.000]  And then there's some sort of banking area, banking law.
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:34.000]  Ostensibly, the reason is because we'd have 50 states with 50 different sets of laws competing with federal law.
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:37.000]  So the ostensible reason makes sense.
[01:32:37.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  As you can imagine, things have gotten out of hand.
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  So, you know, in recent time, for instance, employers were able to mandate all kinds of ridiculous medical interventions without consent, without assumption of liability, and that's what happened to me.
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:33:17.000]  And so I filed a suit in state court and the employer, my union, removed it to district court, the federal court, under the Labor Management Relations Act, the Taft-Harley Act.
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:23.000]  Even though that act wasn't part of what you were addressing.
[01:33:23.000 --> 01:33:27.000]  No, I was addressing tort claims because my claims can't.
[01:33:27.000 --> 01:33:32.000]  How does the Labor Act apply?
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  The defendants say it applies and the lower court agreed with them because they're saying that I claimed a breach of the contract.
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:45.000]  The contract, what contract?
[01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  My contract is a collective bargaining agreement, which is what most union members work under.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  This is the union's collective bargaining agreement.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:08.000]  Right, in that the union representative reached this agreement with my employer.
[01:34:08.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  So they're saying, oh, he really meant that he was what the what the plaintiff was actually trying to say was that he's claiming breach of contract, which is preempted by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act.
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  And then there's only a six month statute of limitations.
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:35.000]  And I filed my lawsuit seven months after I supposedly should have known.
[01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:40.000]  Were you given notice?
[01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  Was I given notice? Yes, I was given notice.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  How is it that you were that you should have known?
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  I should have known because 15 months after the policy that my employer issued, my employer issued a policy, I would not comply with the policy.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  I was put on unpaid leave.
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  Ten months later, while I'm under the contract required grievance procedure, I found out that my union agent was actually he had actually negotiated the policy, even though we were never told that as union members.
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  It was not anywhere in the policy, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  Wait a minute. Your union member had negotiated the policy.
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  What does that mean? The union, sorry, the union representative had negotiated the policy.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:46.000]  What does negotiated the policy mean?
[01:35:46.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  Because when you're a union member working under a collective bargaining agreement, you agree that the union representative does all of your negotiations for you.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  Anyway, that's like getting into the weeds of the case.
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  They have to make it, the defendants have to make this about section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act in order for the 1226 motion to overcome all of my claims.
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  Everything gets twisted into a breach. It's the only way they can skate out without having to address anything.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  Exactly, exactly. But there are several large folds in their argument that I've tried to provide to the appeals court, including the fact that the lower court judge literally did not consider or rule on two of my claims.
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:56.000]  He didn't even mention them. So even as a matter of law, it should be sent back.
[01:36:56.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  It's got to go back, yeah.
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  But I just was curious if I've lost any chance to go back to state court, which is totally fine. I'm in no rush to end up in a state court anyway.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  I know the federal court can adjudicate my state law tort claim, but I do need to address that on my reply brief adequately because the readers of my reply brief, the judges or the clerks, are definitely going to want to see how I respond to the defendant's argument.
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  But I'm okay. Just letting the feds handle it is a good enough answer for me because that's kind of what I was leaning towards anyway.
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  Also, if you're fine with that, then maybe use that as an opportunity to, you know how Randy says sometimes with the council's arguments are well taken and blah, blah, it kind of helps them to feel like they still have a feather in their cap.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:20.000]  Well, you could say, look, I believe this was never about Section 301 and never should have gotten removed to the Fed in the first place. However, since we're here, we're here. No problem. Let's just deal with it here. I'm not going to push for it to go back to the state.
[01:38:20.000 --> 01:38:35.000]  Okay, okay, right, right. And there are plenty of reasons why the remaining claims are not, shouldn't be dismissed under Section 12b6. So, okay, that's great.
[01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:59.000]  That's great. Although the question I had was that there was, I made a claim of negligence and I didn't relinquish the claim. I listed it in the history, you know, I listed it present in my appellate brief, but I didn't really expound on it at all.
[01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  And this was three months ago, and I'm not really sure why, because it's a perfectly valid claim. It's not as strong as the other ones, but it's perfectly valid. For some reason in October when I was writing my appellate brief, I must have thought it didn't have a whole lot of merit.
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:43.000]  But since then I realized I have plenty of merit. So even though I didn't specifically re-argue it in my brief, the defendants are asserting that it should be abandoned because I didn't address it. So what I'm thinking is that since the appeals court has to look at the entire case de novo, they have to look at the whole thing again anew.
[01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  Right.
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:40:01.000]  And I didn't specifically relinquish it. I don't know how it could possibly be abandoned. The defendants clearly mention it as one of the claims that I'm appealing, but then they just say that because I didn't basically re-argue it in the brief, that it should be abandoned.
[01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  That's just probably their laziness. They didn't want to have to try to address it, and so they're trying to just slap at it by saying, well, he didn't mention it, so I think just throw it in the trash.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  Yeah, right. So they feel like their claim that it should be abandoned are a little far-fetched.
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:43.000]  No, just to tell you, I'm not abandoning anything. Whatever I didn't need to mention was because it's being treated de novo. The court will take all of it into account. The only thing that's relinquished is what I said I relinquished.
[01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:48.000]  Yes. Okay. All right.
[01:40:48.000 --> 01:40:52.000]  Is there anything else for the other side?
[01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:55.000]  That's it. That's really it. Thank you.
[01:40:55.000 --> 01:40:57.000]  All right. Well, thanks for calling.
[01:40:57.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  All right. We're going to go to our sponsors.
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  Do you have a business with five employees or more? How would you like to save hundreds of thousands of dollars in FICA taxes? Do you have a major medical plan that nobody can afford to be on?
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  Or how would you like to save in premium costs on a current major medical plan by lowering the claims cost?
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  The CHAMP plan is a Section 125 IRS approved preventative health plan that provides your employees with doctors, medications, emergency care, and Teladoc all at zero cost with zero copay.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  If you are an employee, you also will get a pay raise by paying less in FICA taxes. As an employer, you will save hundreds of thousands of dollars in matching FICA taxes.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:51.000]  The CHAMP plan can help add working capital, market resale value, or pay down lines of credit.
[01:41:51.000 --> 01:42:00.000]  Call Scott at 214-730-2471 or dallasmms.com.
[01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:22.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:42:43.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  Hello? Oh man, you're in jail? You got busted? Oh man, I'm broke, dude.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:30.000]  Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize fully.
[01:43:30.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  Somebody's gonna police that policeman. Somebody's gonna police the police.
[01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  There's always a room at the top of the hill. I hear through the grapevine and it's lonely there still.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:57.000]  They're wishing it was more than opposition to build. They know that if they don't do it, somebody will.
[01:43:57.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize fully.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Somebody's gonna police that policeman. Somebody's gonna police the police.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:18.000]  I know they will. Yeah, they're gonna put the bill.
[01:44:18.000 --> 01:44:22.000]  I know they will. Cause I see so much injustice to them.
[01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:26.000]  I know they will. Never fail to tip back that scale.
[01:44:26.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  I know they will. Never fail to tip back the scale.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  I know they will.
[01:44:35.000 --> 01:44:37.000]  I know they will.
[01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  I said I know.
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:41.000]  I know they will.
[01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  It's meditation hours, huh?
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:45.000]  I know they will.
[01:44:45.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  Yeah.
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:49.000]  I know they will.
[01:44:49.000 --> 01:44:52.000]  Went down to that old rock quarry the other day.
[01:44:52.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  I know they will.
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:56.000]  That's where I heard that old rock quarry man say.
[01:44:56.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  I know they will.
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  He knew I always had a place for my head to lay.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:03.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:06.000]  Randy Kelton, Red Fountain on Rudolfo Radio.
[01:45:06.000 --> 01:45:11.000]  And we're going to Roger.
[01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:14.000]  Is that Chicago? Okay.
[01:45:14.000 --> 01:45:20.000]  Chicago. Are you from the near north side?
[01:45:20.000 --> 01:45:27.000]  Yeah, Randy. I'm from your old neighborhood, a little north of there, Jefferson Park.
[01:45:27.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  Okay, I grew up north and western Humboldt Park.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:37.000]  It was a horrible place. Okay.
[01:45:37.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  What do you have for us today?
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:46.000]  Okay, yeah, I'm deeply concerned with a friend of mine from the north side, too.
[01:45:46.000 --> 01:45:49.000]  I'm Roger, Chicago, Wisconsin, if you recall.
[01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:56.000]  Anyways, I got stuck in Wisconsin here and hoping to get back to my city by the lake.
[01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:06.000]  But he had a home for about 20-some odd years and got a mortgage.
[01:46:06.000 --> 01:46:13.000]  It was part of that subprime bundle of tobacco and the bubble burst.
[01:46:13.000 --> 01:46:21.000]  But he's at the point now where he's got the mortgage company coming after him.
[01:46:21.000 --> 01:46:29.000]  And for the past year and a half, maybe even two years possibly, hopefully he's listening.
[01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:31.000]  So I told him to listen.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  And he's at the point now where I was 12 years ago when I first started listening to your show by appointment or recommendation from Mark from Wisconsin.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:50.000]  You don't want to happen to him. I haven't heard from him in forever.
[01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  Yeah, no, I haven't either. I have no idea if he's listening anymore or what.
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:47:06.000]  But he had told me that I would have to listen to him for 12 years like I'm telling my friend now.
[01:47:06.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  He's in the same predicament with the pre-foreclosure and foreclosure that I was, you know, the same situation.
[01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  Okay, wait, wait. He's in pre-foreclosure. How much pre-foreclosure is he in? How far behind on his mortgage is he?
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:35.000]  He's behind years, you know, I mean.
[01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:42.000]  Wait, wait a minute. Okay, he's behind years and he has been fighting the foreclosure.
[01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:52.000]  What has he done in trying to keep the lender at bay?
[01:47:52.000 --> 01:48:05.000]  Well, basically they keep, he's telling me that they keep sending him applications for a mortgage and he spills out 12 of them thus far.
[01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:15.000]  Wait, wait, hold on. This guy has a mortgage and he's behind on the mortgage and they're sending him applications for a mortgage?
[01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:23.000]  Yeah, and the only thing I could figure is that they can't produce a wet signature note for one thing.
[01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:50.000]  Another thing I remember you stating way back when you used to cover about the fact of subpoenaing the CEO or the president of the whatever lender to testify in court and that they don't, they won't show up.
[01:48:50.000 --> 01:49:04.000]  And then this disproportionate aspect that you spoke of, I thought of that as well because he's married and, you know, they can't afford an attorney.
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:28.000]  So if he was not married and a single person and he was a pro se litigant that was quite knowledgeable, he could stand a chance, you know, to keep the mortgage company at bay by, you know, waiving the court costs and keeping them in court for, you know, until they finally, you know.
[01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:35.000]  Okay, okay. I've helped several hundred people choose it.
[01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:47.000]  In order to get to the issue, a number of questions I would have to ask in order to figure out where this guy is.
[01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:59.000]  And it's very unlikely that I can, through you as a third party, I need to talk to this guy.
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:13.000]  You know, that raises a question. This guy is in a foreclosure issue. Why am I talking to him?
[01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:29.000]  Yeah, I advised him. I asked, first of all, I said, did you get a court date? And he said, yes. I go, okay, did you show up? He goes, no. And I said, well, do you know if they got a default judgment?
[01:50:29.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  And he didn't know. I said, well, you have to go down to the county courthouse to the clerk and access the file. Am I correct?
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:50.000]  Absolutely correct. What I'm hearing here, and now you're talking to somebody, it's helped over 700 people choose.
[01:50:50.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  And have someone here who, his life is about to collapse in around him.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:02.000]  That's what I'm telling him.
[01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:12.000]  He's not talking. Why are you talking to me at his benefit? He's not talking.
[01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:13.000]  Yeah.
[01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:17.000]  You are not going to be able to fix his issue for it.
[01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  I have a close family member, same kind of story.
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:40.000]  And yeah, he was in denial. He wouldn't do anything. Everybody around him cared and wanted things to be improved and was trying to convince him, but he was sure. He was wrong, but he was sure.
[01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:43.000]  I suggest I'm going to answer you.
[01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:50.000]  Not changing your life is wrong.
[01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:52.000]  What?
[01:51:52.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  Chasing your life, you expect.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  So right here, your audio was cutting out a little bit there. Can you repeat it a little louder?
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:08.000]  Yes, you will not achieve in your life what you want and what you wish for.
[01:52:08.000 --> 01:52:11.000]  You'll achieve in your life what you expect.
[01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:17.000]  And I know that may sound a little off topic, but not. You're trying to help someone.
[01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  And he's not here.
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:24.000]  Why is he not here?
[01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:37.000]  If you want to help the person, you may have to address his internal expectations before you can address his foreclosure issue.
[01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:47.000]  And I'm saying this because I've worked with hundreds of people trying to help them with foreclosure issues.
[01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:52.000]  You will not get in your life what you expect, what you want and what you wish for.
[01:52:52.000 --> 01:53:03.000]  If he expects to be mistreated and to be cheated by everyone around him, he'll make sure he is.
[01:53:03.000 --> 01:53:08.000]  And you can do everything you can to try to help him.
[01:53:08.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  And he will not allow you to help him while at the same time he's railing in righteous indignation at the inequity of it all.
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:30.000]  Foreclosure, this is such a traumatic experience for people.
[01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:51.000]  If you can't get this guy to stand up, develop a little righteous indignation and decide to fight these guys, you're not going to be able to help him.
[01:53:51.000 --> 01:53:56.000]  Yeah, you hit the nail on the head, Randy, sadly.
[01:53:56.000 --> 01:54:09.000]  But the basic premise that I've been trying to install in them, you know, and you mentioned attorneys, they really don't have money to hire any attorney that would be effective.
[01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:20.000]  And I've tried to tell them that they're in bed just like the judges with the mortgage companies.
[01:54:20.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  You know, and he could be, he should be supposed to be listening to this right now.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:31.000]  He might try and call in subsequently.
[01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  And if you can get him to call in tomorrow night, that'll be great.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:40.000]  Yeah, we're out of time tonight.
[01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:42.000]  But this is what I do.
[01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:44.000]  And we can't help him.
[01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:48.000]  The thing about mortgages is they're all screwed up.
[01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:53.000]  And there is so much you can do to beat up the mortgage company.
[01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:56.000]  You will not believe it.
[01:54:56.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  But when you're sitting in a spot and you're looking at being thrown out of your house onto the street, it is absolutely debilitating.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:10.000]  Can't think straight, right?
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  You have to be able to get past that and be willing to take these guys on.
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  I got more stuff to beat up mortgage companies than you could ever get to.
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  Have this guy, have him call in tomorrow.
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:28.000]  I'm going to ask questions that only he can answer.
[01:55:28.000 --> 01:55:36.000]  And I will want to evaluate him and determine whether or not I think he can save his property.
[01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:39.000]  Get him over to your house and call on your line.
[01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:41.000]  But he's there.
[01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  Yeah.
[01:55:45.000 --> 01:55:47.000]  I'm sorry, we're out of time.
[01:55:47.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  We'll be back tomorrow night.