[00:00.000 --> 00:05.680] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.680 --> 00:09.360] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.360 --> 00:10.840] Our liberty depends on it. [00:10.840 --> 00:14.760] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:14.760 --> 00:16.880] your First Amendment rights. [00:16.880 --> 00:18.460] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.460 --> 00:22.060] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.060 --> 00:26.840] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.840 --> 00:32.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [00:32.000 --> 00:33.000] Privacy. [00:33.000 --> 00:34.600] It's worth hanging on to. [00:34.600 --> 00:38.880] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [00:38.880 --> 00:42.420] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.420 --> 00:44.720] Start over with StartPage. [00:44.720 --> 00:46.480] Spar. [00:46.480 --> 00:47.720] It's what fighters do. [00:47.720 --> 00:51.160] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.160 --> 00:54.400] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you. [00:54.400 --> 00:56.440] S-P-A-R with an extra P. [00:56.440 --> 01:02.840] S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:02.840 --> 01:06.880] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, [01:06.880 --> 01:08.400] assembly, and religion. [01:08.400 --> 01:10.760] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.760 --> 01:14.480] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.480 --> 01:18.000] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out [01:18.000 --> 01:20.600] the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:20.600 --> 01:22.600] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:22.600 --> 01:31.080] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.080 --> 01:34.720] The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.720 --> 01:38.200] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.200 --> 01:39.640] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.640 --> 01:43.560] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:43.560 --> 01:46.700] one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.700 --> 01:48.280] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.280 --> 01:51.880] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.880 --> 01:56.680] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:56.680 --> 02:01.800] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.800 --> 02:04.440] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [02:04.440 --> 02:08.720] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [02:08.720 --> 02:12.260] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.260 --> 02:14.360] Start over with StartPage. [02:14.360 --> 02:20.200] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill [02:20.200 --> 02:22.280] of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.280 --> 02:26.760] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms [02:26.760 --> 02:30.600] that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.600 --> 02:31.600] Get it? [02:31.600 --> 02:33.920] Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? [02:33.920 --> 02:37.520] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.520 --> 02:43.280] when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary [02:43.280 --> 02:47.400] government, one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America, [02:47.400 --> 02:50.440] but which historically has proved to always be possible. [02:50.440 --> 02:52.440] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [02:52.440 --> 03:22.400] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:22.440 --> 03:33.800] Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law. [03:33.800 --> 03:36.360] Wait a minute, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio. [03:36.360 --> 03:38.480] Brett Fountain's not here today. [03:38.480 --> 03:44.600] Brett Fountain is on a masochistic weekend. [03:44.600 --> 03:51.200] He has taken his son out camping and wait a minute, he's calling me. [03:51.200 --> 03:54.920] Hello, Brett. [03:54.920 --> 04:02.720] I was just, yeah I was, I'm just starting the show and I was just in there, just told [04:02.720 --> 04:06.720] everybody that you are on a masochistic weekend. [04:06.720 --> 04:16.240] You're taking your son out camping in 105 degree heat. [04:16.240 --> 04:22.920] So are you out camping or are you ready to come on the air? [04:22.920 --> 04:31.320] Oh, I'm already on, so just bring yourself on and I'll quit picking on you. [04:31.320 --> 04:35.480] Everybody's listening to this, you know. [04:35.480 --> 04:40.840] Okay, well that was interesting. [04:40.840 --> 04:49.080] Here I was going to work on Brett a little bit and pick on him and he's there listening. [04:49.080 --> 04:56.160] Okay, I am, I want to talk about some bar grievances. [04:56.160 --> 05:02.040] I sued about 30 something litigants. [05:02.040 --> 05:07.840] Sued them for 500 million or 480 something million. [05:07.840 --> 05:14.440] I sued all the highest judges in Texas and I sued the directors of all the agencies I [05:14.440 --> 05:25.760] could find that train public officials in due process. [05:25.760 --> 05:34.400] So I figured, you know, I'm not suing some chump justice of the peace in Podoc, Texas. [05:34.400 --> 05:38.720] I'm suing the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals judges. [05:38.720 --> 05:45.920] I sued Sharon Kelly, presiding judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals. [05:45.920 --> 05:52.320] I sued Nathan Hatch, Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. [05:52.320 --> 06:02.200] These are the highest persons around and I'm expecting some really good responses so that [06:02.200 --> 06:12.600] when I go back to Wise County, where I'm from, and sue chump Judge Brock Smith in Podoc, [06:12.600 --> 06:20.760] Texas, that I've got really good information to go after him with. [06:20.760 --> 06:28.400] They got all the stuff I need so that when he hires his local yokel prosecutors or local [06:28.400 --> 06:33.600] yokel lawyers who don't know squat, that I'll wipe the floor with them. [06:33.600 --> 06:37.920] Well, it didn't work out that way. [06:37.920 --> 06:45.440] I got all of these responses from all of these different high level public officials, the [06:45.440 --> 06:51.360] highest level public officials in the state of Texas. [06:51.360 --> 06:58.920] And I just filed a bar grievance against all their lawyers, excuse my coughy thing, we [06:58.920 --> 06:59.920] don't have that. [06:59.920 --> 07:00.920] Did you call them incompetent? [07:00.920 --> 07:02.880] Oh, listen to this. [07:02.880 --> 07:10.080] American Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.382 reads as follows. [07:10.080 --> 07:18.240] Now, this is the complaint itself, this is how it starts, that it is unprofessional [07:18.240 --> 07:28.520] conduct for a lawyer to fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling [07:28.520 --> 07:35.960] jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and [07:35.960 --> 07:39.280] not disclosed by opposing counsel. [07:39.280 --> 07:45.480] Remember I addressed this last week and I didn't know where it was at. [07:45.480 --> 07:52.280] Is American Bar Association Model Standards 3.382, and that's appropriate because I [07:52.280 --> 07:55.240] sued them in the federal court. [07:55.240 --> 08:02.800] I wrote this suit, actually not realizing I was doing it, around the Young Doctrine. [08:02.800 --> 08:05.680] Okay, I'm going to go on. [08:05.680 --> 08:14.480] According to the Texas Bar Association, approximately 25% of all cases are now litigated by pro [08:14.480 --> 08:16.480] se litigants. [08:16.480 --> 08:22.760] It attributes this rising trend to the fact that the public has lost faith in the legal [08:22.760 --> 08:23.760] community. [08:23.760 --> 08:27.040] Take care, gentlemen and women. [08:27.040 --> 08:33.760] AI and other technologies are on the verge of putting lawyers out of business, and because [08:33.760 --> 08:38.960] of your abominable behavior, the public is well motivated to do so. [08:38.960 --> 08:47.320] In the instance case, I carefully crafted a petition around the Young Doctrine. [08:47.320 --> 08:55.620] The state has no power to impart to its officer immunity from responsibility to the Supreme [08:55.620 --> 09:05.240] Authority of the United States, Ex parte Young 209 U.S. 123 at 124-1908. [09:05.240 --> 09:11.960] The suit was carefully worded so as to only bring a claim under federal law wherein I [09:11.960 --> 09:18.800] accuse the litigants of an ongoing criminal conspiracy in the form of an ongoing criminal [09:18.800 --> 09:20.800] enterprise. [09:20.800 --> 09:25.680] I sued the highest level judges in Texas to include all judges of the Court of Criminal [09:25.680 --> 09:30.620] Appeals and the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. [09:30.620 --> 09:38.160] Inasmuch as I sued high-level judges, I was expecting and hoping for some very well-pleaded [09:38.160 --> 09:39.160] responses. [09:39.160 --> 09:42.980] What I got was trash. [09:42.980 --> 09:50.920] The only impediment to me getting past a Rule 12 motion to dismiss was some definitive case [09:50.920 --> 09:55.520] law carving out exceptions to the Young Doctrine. [09:55.520 --> 10:00.360] The lawyers in this case provided nothing. [10:00.360 --> 10:09.000] The only arguments brought were asserting state immunity against federal allegations. [10:09.000 --> 10:15.640] Counsel in arguing state immunity in the face of a federal claim was a clear failure to [10:15.640 --> 10:18.760] speak with candor to the court. [10:18.760 --> 10:23.800] I was certainly hoping to be able to sharpen my pleadings by playing off the arguments [10:23.800 --> 10:29.920] for a Rule 12 dismissal, but instead I got nothing more than what an eighth grader could [10:29.920 --> 10:30.920] have produced. [10:30.920 --> 10:40.020] I sued the state of Texas for on the order of $500 million, and this is all counsel could [10:40.020 --> 10:41.320] produce in response. [10:41.320 --> 10:44.400] The entire profession should be ashamed. [10:44.400 --> 10:48.840] In the instant case, I carefully crafted a position around the Young Doctrine. [10:48.840 --> 10:53.760] The state has no power—oh, I'm sorry, that was redundant. [10:53.760 --> 10:57.280] Okay, I made a mistake. [10:57.280 --> 11:06.200] I just sent out a stack of bar grievances, almost a little over two inches tall. [11:06.200 --> 11:07.200] Nice. [11:07.200 --> 11:11.040] But it seems I have this redundancy in there. [11:11.040 --> 11:13.400] The suit was carefully worded so as to bring a claim— [11:13.400 --> 11:14.400] That's okay. [11:14.400 --> 11:15.840] They weren't paying attention the first time. [11:15.840 --> 11:16.840] You're right. [11:16.840 --> 11:17.840] That's right. [11:17.840 --> 11:21.480] The federal law wherein I accused the litigants of an ongoing crime was spurious in the form [11:21.480 --> 11:24.560] of an ongoing criminal enterprise. [11:24.560 --> 11:30.440] I sued—I'm afraid I made a mistake, I should have read that a second time. [11:30.440 --> 11:35.800] The only impediment in getting to Rule 12 was the lawyer provided nothing. [11:35.800 --> 11:42.440] Counsel in arguing state immunity in the face of a federal claim was a clear failure to [11:42.440 --> 11:44.440] speak with Canada court. [11:44.440 --> 11:51.560] I was recently—I apologize, guys, I didn't read this carefully a second time. [11:51.560 --> 11:56.640] But the last sentence is, the entire profession should be ashamed. [11:56.640 --> 11:59.080] Yeah, I like that. [11:59.080 --> 12:01.360] That's heavy-hitting. [12:01.360 --> 12:06.560] So I sent off, I don't know, probably 50. [12:06.560 --> 12:16.160] There are six pages apiece, and the stack was—it was 290-something pages altogether. [12:16.160 --> 12:19.120] And that's just the first round. [12:19.120 --> 12:23.640] Oh, it was glorious. [12:23.640 --> 12:30.320] The presiding judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals got the attorney general to file an [12:30.320 --> 12:32.120] answer for her. [12:32.120 --> 12:42.080] Now, you would think that the attorney general, in filing an answer for the presiding judge [12:42.080 --> 12:47.040] of the Court of Criminal Appeals, would pay attention. [12:47.040 --> 12:52.120] Yeah, take it seriously, do an excellent job. [12:52.120 --> 12:59.160] And not give it to some two-bit chunk chump first-year attorney just out of law school [12:59.160 --> 13:01.680] at the bottom of the heap. [13:01.680 --> 13:08.840] I had, I think, five lawyer names on this document, and the last one was the guy who [13:08.840 --> 13:12.120] actually wrote it. [13:12.120 --> 13:20.560] I know he's the guy who wrote it, because he's the guy who wrote one for the directors [13:20.560 --> 13:23.400] of the different agencies. [13:23.400 --> 13:25.420] He wrote it for all of them. [13:25.420 --> 13:26.420] But on the one— [13:26.420 --> 13:28.120] Which one was he? [13:28.120 --> 13:32.640] Donovan, I think, was his name. [13:32.640 --> 13:37.480] But there were five others, and I went up the list, and they didn't have bar-card numbers [13:37.480 --> 13:38.480] on them. [13:38.480 --> 13:40.960] You helped me find them. [13:40.960 --> 13:50.920] But the first one in the list was the acting attorney general. [13:50.920 --> 13:57.400] I just have bar-grieved her about four or five times, separate bar grievance for each [13:57.400 --> 13:58.400] client. [13:58.400 --> 14:02.760] Oh, it was glorious. [14:02.760 --> 14:06.320] She's going to have apoplexy. [14:06.320 --> 14:13.120] They sue—when you sue as a pro se litigant, they assume you're an idiot. [14:13.120 --> 14:20.680] So they give the suit to one of their lowest-level lawyers, and that's a great— [14:20.680 --> 14:22.720] And that's what they get here, Donovan? [14:22.720 --> 14:23.720] Yeah. [14:23.720 --> 14:24.720] Yeah, he's a nothing. [14:24.720 --> 14:31.720] That's what they always do, because they think we're all chumps, and it's a great [14:31.720 --> 14:35.260] advantage that we have. [14:35.260 --> 14:39.440] The biggest advantage we have is time. [14:39.440 --> 14:49.040] I have probably spent 30 years on this lawsuit, all this time talking to all you folks and [14:49.040 --> 14:54.080] having you guys call and asking me hard questions, and me trying to figure out how to answer [14:54.080 --> 14:57.040] those questions. [14:57.040 --> 15:05.920] Over the last 15 years has prepared me for this, helping several hundred people sue lawyers, [15:05.920 --> 15:10.760] sue on foreclosures and all kinds of other stuff. [15:10.760 --> 15:14.760] All of that was to prepare me for this. [15:14.760 --> 15:20.600] I got 30 years trying to fix a problem. [15:20.600 --> 15:27.360] Forty years ago, I was thrown in jail—actually, it's 40 years now, I think—1981. [15:27.360 --> 15:32.360] I spent the night in jail for driving with a headlight out, and that didn't seem right. [15:32.360 --> 15:37.480] So when I got out, I got the Code of Criminal Procedure, penal code, and read them, and [15:37.480 --> 15:43.600] then looked at the practice and thought, have I stepped through the looking glass? [15:43.600 --> 15:49.840] How can the practice be so dramatically different than the law? [15:49.840 --> 15:55.640] And that started me on this quest, and it's taken me 30 years to get here. [15:55.640 --> 16:04.200] But we're at the end, and I think the point I want to make to everyone is I sued all the [16:04.200 --> 16:11.520] highest judges in Texas in their personal capacity. [16:11.520 --> 16:23.320] In a state of 29 million people, where these public officials are doing everything wrong, [16:23.320 --> 16:28.800] only one guy sues them. [16:28.800 --> 16:31.720] And I have really got their attention. [16:31.720 --> 16:37.720] Obviously, they haven't been sued this way before, or their responses would have been [16:37.720 --> 16:43.120] at least a little bit sophisticated. [16:43.120 --> 16:46.320] An eighth grader could have filed these responses. [16:46.320 --> 16:50.240] They were trash. [16:50.240 --> 16:53.240] Point is, we're the baddest motorists. [16:53.240 --> 16:56.320] We're citizens of the baddest motor schools in the building. [16:56.320 --> 17:00.200] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back. [17:00.200 --> 17:04.840] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [17:04.840 --> 17:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [17:09.000 --> 17:13.320] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you [17:13.320 --> 17:14.640] can win two. [17:14.640 --> 17:19.160] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [17:19.160 --> 17:25.040] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer [17:25.040 --> 17:29.560] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the [17:29.560 --> 17:33.760] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [17:33.760 --> 17:38.880] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [17:38.880 --> 17:41.040] Personal consultation is available as well. [17:41.040 --> 17:46.560] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, [17:46.560 --> 17:49.520] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [17:49.520 --> 17:58.520] That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [17:58.520 --> 18:01.480] collectors now. [18:01.480 --> 18:05.880] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [18:05.880 --> 18:06.880] Word? [18:06.880 --> 18:11.560] Then tune in to LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for [18:11.560 --> 18:16.600] Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy [18:16.600 --> 18:18.400] 2.15. [18:18.400 --> 18:22.900] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly [18:22.900 --> 18:25.320] dividing the word of truth. [18:25.320 --> 18:28.960] Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go [18:28.960 --> 18:32.640] verse by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [18:32.640 --> 18:37.280] Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [18:37.280 --> 18:39.640] and Christian character development. [18:39.640 --> 18:44.160] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [18:44.160 --> 18:48.480] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [18:48.480 --> 18:50.760] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [18:50.760 --> 18:57.400] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and [18:57.400 --> 18:59.400] motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [19:27.400 --> 19:32.400] And I wonder what they hide They don't have the answers [19:32.400 --> 19:37.400] They don't find nobody They react with questions [19:37.400 --> 19:42.400] Look what we get And they don't have the answers [19:42.400 --> 19:46.400] All soap and slip and slide I'ma talk about issues for see Lord how [19:46.400 --> 19:52.400] they want we to take it easy I'ma talk we do politically and them getting [19:52.400 --> 19:56.400] mad and angry But them not standing up and fighting, fight [19:56.400 --> 20:01.400] for the freedom and be free And they like them love slavery and get hand [20:01.400 --> 20:04.400] out from the government Well we get [20:04.400 --> 20:09.400] We react with questions Look what they hide [20:09.400 --> 20:14.400] They don't have the answers Open up your body [20:14.400 --> 20:16.400] Okay, we are back. [20:16.400 --> 20:21.400] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain with LogosRadio and I started this show and I didn't give [20:21.400 --> 20:23.400] out the date. [20:23.400 --> 20:25.400] Oh my goodness. [20:25.400 --> 20:31.400] That's because Brett wasn't here to give me the wrong date. [20:31.400 --> 20:32.400] Okay. [20:32.400 --> 20:39.400] This is our Thursday show, August the 10th, 2023. [20:39.400 --> 20:44.400] And we have to do this regularly so that anybody listening to the archives will [20:44.400 --> 20:48.400] know when we have a live show and when it's an archive. [20:48.400 --> 20:57.400] Okay. According to Brett, he looked up this lawyer and it was Dorfman. [20:57.400 --> 20:59.400] Yeah, Judge Grant Dorfman. [20:59.400 --> 21:03.400] His honorific prefix listed on the Texas bar is judge. [21:03.400 --> 21:06.400] And oh, wonderful. [21:06.400 --> 21:12.400] From the context of his pleading. [21:12.400 --> 21:16.400] I thought he was a young lawyer. [21:16.400 --> 21:18.400] He's been a bar. [21:18.400 --> 21:21.400] It was 1992 when he became an attorney. [21:21.400 --> 21:24.400] So he's been an attorney since 1992. [21:24.400 --> 21:26.400] And he was a judge. [21:26.400 --> 21:33.400] And he writes a pleading where I sued them claim my only claim against them. [21:33.400 --> 21:36.400] And it was a singular claim. [21:36.400 --> 21:47.400] It was that they violated federal laws while acting under the color or [21:47.400 --> 21:50.400] pretense of their official capacity. [21:50.400 --> 21:55.400] They acted toward an ongoing criminal enterprise. [21:55.400 --> 21:57.400] Well, I got this response from him. [21:57.400 --> 22:06.400] He responded for the presiding judge of the court of criminal appeals in one [22:06.400 --> 22:10.400] pleading for all of the rest, the other eight judges of the court of criminal [22:10.400 --> 22:14.400] appeals in another pleading. [22:14.400 --> 22:22.400] And for a number of the heads of agencies, Texas agencies that I sued. [22:22.400 --> 22:28.400] Well, he he filed a response for the presiding judge of the court of criminal [22:28.400 --> 22:30.400] appeals. [22:30.400 --> 22:42.400] And the only thing he referenced was that she had immunity of qualified [22:42.400 --> 22:46.400] immunity and absolute immunity. [22:46.400 --> 22:55.400] Based on the fact that she failed to issue a warrant against Nathan Hedge, [22:55.400 --> 22:59.400] the chief justice of the Texas Supreme. [22:59.400 --> 23:02.400] I filed a criminal complaint against him against the governor. [23:02.400 --> 23:05.400] He refused to issue a warrant. [23:05.400 --> 23:10.400] So I filed a complaint against him with the chief justice of the court of [23:10.400 --> 23:17.400] criminal appeals charging him with shielding from prosecution and official [23:17.400 --> 23:23.400] oppression for refusing to perform a duty he was required to perform in that [23:23.400 --> 23:27.400] he he failed to issue a warrant. [23:27.400 --> 23:30.400] Yeah, that's an administrative duty. [23:30.400 --> 23:37.400] Yeah, she should have seen the irony in that because she did the same thing. [23:37.400 --> 23:40.400] No, I want you to pay attention. [23:40.400 --> 23:41.400] Right. [23:41.400 --> 23:50.400] But her lawyer, this Dorfman, only responded to the failure to issue a warrant. [23:50.400 --> 23:58.400] He did not object to the federal claim I made against her. [23:58.400 --> 24:04.400] Well, the failure to issue a warrant, that was not a claim I made against her. [24:04.400 --> 24:09.400] That was just a fact in support of my claim of an act in furtherance of an [24:09.400 --> 24:12.400] ongoing criminal conspiracy. [24:12.400 --> 24:19.400] And that by failing to issue the warrant, she shielded other actors from [24:19.400 --> 24:28.400] prosecution that the only way this criminal enterprise was able to maintain [24:28.400 --> 24:36.400] itself was by judges, magistrates refusing to perform their duty and issue [24:36.400 --> 24:44.400] warrants against other members of the conspiracy. [24:44.400 --> 24:47.400] He didn't respond to that at all. [24:47.400 --> 24:50.400] He only responded to the fact that she didn't issue a warrant. [24:50.400 --> 24:55.400] I guess he figured if he could get away with the whole the magic word immunity, [24:55.400 --> 24:58.400] then it would all just go away, poof. [24:58.400 --> 25:08.400] Yeah, but back to 3A2, he is commanded to bring to the attention of the court [25:08.400 --> 25:14.400] the young doctor, but he didn't do that. [25:14.400 --> 25:16.400] And he didn't argue anything else. [25:16.400 --> 25:26.400] All eight other judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals, he argued that they [25:26.400 --> 25:37.400] had immunity for my claims based on the conspiracy. [25:37.400 --> 25:46.400] He didn't mention the conspiracy claims in his answer. [25:46.400 --> 25:52.400] I'm sorry, he didn't mention the conspiracy claims in his answer for Judge Kelly. [25:52.400 --> 25:55.400] I'm trying to make a really important point here. [25:55.400 --> 26:06.400] I sued Judge Kelly, Keller, for engaging in an ongoing criminal conspiracy. [26:06.400 --> 26:14.400] The lawyer responded to that by claiming that the act of issuing a warrant can [26:14.400 --> 26:21.400] only be issued by a magistrate, and because that can only be issued by a [26:21.400 --> 26:27.400] magistrate, it is necessarily a judicial act, and she has absolute immunity [26:27.400 --> 26:29.400] for a judicial act. [26:29.400 --> 26:31.400] Wow. [26:31.400 --> 26:34.400] Well, that's not exactly true. [26:34.400 --> 26:42.400] She has absolute immunity in the state of Texas for a violation of a judicial act. [26:42.400 --> 26:44.400] Not in the Fed. [26:44.400 --> 26:51.400] But they also can't just say that any kind of magisterial and ministerial duty [26:51.400 --> 26:54.400] automatically becomes a judicial act. [26:54.400 --> 26:57.400] Because the actor is a judicial officer. [26:57.400 --> 26:58.400] Yeah. [26:58.400 --> 27:01.400] But that was really stupid of him to do that. [27:01.400 --> 27:07.400] Yeah, it was, and by doing so, he waived the chance to argue anything else. [27:07.400 --> 27:08.400] Okay, you're not a lawyer. [27:08.400 --> 27:11.400] You're like me, just a chump pro se. [27:11.400 --> 27:14.400] But you got that. [27:14.400 --> 27:22.400] So how does a judge who's been a lawyer since 1992 not get that? [27:22.400 --> 27:24.400] He got it. [27:24.400 --> 27:26.400] He didn't have an answer. [27:26.400 --> 27:29.400] He didn't have an answer. [27:29.400 --> 27:32.400] So I called him on it. [27:32.400 --> 27:38.400] My point to you guys is this does not take a rocket scientist. [27:38.400 --> 27:43.400] You don't have to know all the law before you take someone on. [27:43.400 --> 27:50.400] You only have to know the law that goes to a very focused issue. [27:50.400 --> 27:53.400] Your particular issue. [27:53.400 --> 27:58.400] And you can go online and search for your particular issue. [27:58.400 --> 28:01.400] You'll find all kinds of case law on it. [28:01.400 --> 28:08.400] And you can relatively quickly accumulate the vast majority of the case law [28:08.400 --> 28:12.400] that goes to a particular issue. [28:12.400 --> 28:15.400] That does not take a rocket scientist. [28:15.400 --> 28:17.400] And it doesn't take learning counsel. [28:17.400 --> 28:24.400] Learning counsel has to know contract law, family law, probate law, blah, blah, blah, blah. [28:24.400 --> 28:25.400] All these different laws. [28:25.400 --> 28:28.400] You don't need to know all that. [28:28.400 --> 28:30.400] You got one issue. [28:30.400 --> 28:34.400] And you have all the time you want to take. [28:34.400 --> 28:40.400] Not all, but you generally have two or three years, depending on the statute of limitations. [28:40.400 --> 28:46.400] And since I chose ongoing criminal enterprise, there is no statute of limitations. [28:46.400 --> 28:51.400] So I have all the time I want to do all my homework. [28:51.400 --> 28:53.400] You file the suit. [28:53.400 --> 29:01.400] They have until the Monday after the 20th day to answer that suit or file a Rule 12B motion. [29:01.400 --> 29:02.400] They don't have all that time. [29:02.400 --> 29:06.400] I filed a 150-page suit. [29:06.400 --> 29:08.400] That's 30 years of research. [29:08.400 --> 29:10.400] Good luck, guys. [29:10.400 --> 29:14.400] We can beat these guys. [29:14.400 --> 29:18.400] We actually have them outgunned. [29:18.400 --> 29:19.400] We have Jane on it. [29:19.400 --> 29:21.400] I'll talk to her in a bit. [29:21.400 --> 29:24.400] Jane first started talking to us on the Telegram chattel. [29:24.400 --> 29:27.400] She did no squat. [29:27.400 --> 29:29.400] She screwed up everything. [29:29.400 --> 29:34.400] And then after two or three months, she's given other people advice. [29:34.400 --> 29:40.400] She's given a really good advice. [29:40.400 --> 29:43.400] I can't tell you how good that made me feel. [29:43.400 --> 29:45.400] This is why we're here. [29:45.400 --> 29:47.400] We can beat these guys. [29:47.400 --> 29:51.400] Come on, Mandy Kelter, Rhett Fountain, Wheel of Our Radio. [29:51.400 --> 29:56.400] Our call-in number, 512-646-1984. [29:56.400 --> 30:01.400] We'll be right back. [30:01.400 --> 30:06.400] Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information, and you may trust them to keep it safe. [30:06.400 --> 30:11.400] But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets. [30:11.400 --> 30:15.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with details. [30:15.400 --> 30:17.400] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.400 --> 30:20.400] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.400 --> 30:25.400] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:25.400 --> 30:30.400] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.400 --> 30:33.400] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.400 --> 30:36.400] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [30:36.400 --> 30:40.400] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:40.400 --> 30:44.400] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.400 --> 30:51.400] Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information. [30:51.400 --> 30:54.400] But what happens if it escapes their control? [30:54.400 --> 30:55.400] It's not an idle question. [30:55.400 --> 31:03.400] According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year. [31:03.400 --> 31:07.400] That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com. [31:07.400 --> 31:11.400] Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you. [31:11.400 --> 31:15.400] They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see. [31:15.400 --> 31:17.400] The cupboard would be bare. [31:17.400 --> 31:21.400] Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way. [31:21.400 --> 31:44.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:51.400 --> 31:52.400] There's more to the story. [31:52.400 --> 31:55.400] Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. [31:55.400 --> 31:57.400] Go to buildingwatt.org. [31:57.400 --> 32:02.400] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [32:02.400 --> 32:05.400] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [32:05.400 --> 32:07.400] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society. [32:07.400 --> 32:12.400] And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:12.400 --> 32:17.400] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, [32:17.400 --> 32:19.400] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:19.400 --> 32:25.400] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:25.400 --> 32:28.400] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:28.400 --> 32:33.400] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [32:33.400 --> 32:35.400] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.400 --> 32:40.400] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:40.400 --> 32:45.400] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:45.400 --> 32:50.400] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:50.400 --> 32:54.400] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:54.400 --> 33:15.400] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:24.400 --> 33:39.400] Okay, we are back, Randy Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [33:39.400 --> 33:46.400] And I know I'm spending some time on this, but I've been doing this show for 15 years. [33:46.400 --> 33:55.400] And I started my research into law because I found a problem. [33:55.400 --> 34:04.400] I'm trained as an engineer, and I found a system that was breaking down generally. [34:04.400 --> 34:11.400] And as an engineer, when you find a system that's breaking down generally, you can't blame the operator. [34:11.400 --> 34:19.400] And that's what everybody was doing, was blaming the police, blaming the clerks, blaming the judges. [34:19.400 --> 34:26.400] Said, no, no, no, this system's breaking down generally. Somewhere underneath this, something is broken. [34:26.400 --> 34:31.400] And it took a long time, took 15 years to get it sorted out. [34:31.400 --> 34:42.400] And for all of this crap that's going on, the primary underlying problem turned out to be that when policemen arrest someone, [34:42.400 --> 34:46.400] they don't take them directly to the nearest magistrate. [34:46.400 --> 34:54.400] That was the procedure that would protect us from all these other problems that have occurred. [34:54.400 --> 35:03.400] It took 15 years to figure out what the heck was going on. It took another 15 years to figure out how to address it. [35:03.400 --> 35:13.400] And now we're in the process of addressing it. And in addressing it is a skill in its own right. [35:13.400 --> 35:27.400] But most of us spend the majority of our life and experience with the legal system being subjected to it. [35:27.400 --> 35:36.400] So when I speak about going to court, the only experience people have is being dragged into court. [35:36.400 --> 35:48.400] Yeah, that's all very negative, very oppressive. Yeah. OK, good. Jane, how did it feel when you were dragged into court? [35:48.400 --> 35:58.400] Can you hear me? I don't know if I'm on mute or not. You're not on mute. Hello. OK. Hello, Jane. Hi. [35:58.400 --> 36:07.400] Yeah, you're a good example because you're kind of on both sides. You knew what it was like when they came after you. [36:07.400 --> 36:17.400] Your neighbor came after you with a lawyer and you were talking to us and you were terrified. Yeah, I was. [36:17.400 --> 36:25.400] You were afraid they were going to steal your life from you and you had these unreasonable expectations of how horrible things are going to be. [36:25.400 --> 36:32.400] Well, I don't know how unreasonable they were. You had some help, so it didn't work out as bad as it could have. [36:32.400 --> 36:39.400] But you were terrified. You had no idea what was coming at you. Yeah, well, I mean, that one. [36:39.400 --> 36:46.400] Actually, I went back and listened to some of the hearings that I had in that court, and actually I was doing pretty good over there. [36:46.400 --> 36:53.400] But what I didn't do good at is when I went to the municipal court for the theft and the trespass whenever I arrested my cow. [36:53.400 --> 36:59.400] OK, but this is reason I brought you in is because you're a good example. [36:59.400 --> 37:03.400] You started out terrified. These guys try to ruin your life. [37:03.400 --> 37:08.400] And you weren't a chop. You didn't back down and roll over for him. [37:08.400 --> 37:13.400] You fought him. Yeah. And as you fought him, they did more and more crap to you. [37:13.400 --> 37:23.400] And Brett and I have talked to you lots of times where you're despondent and you're ready to give up. You don't know what to do. [37:23.400 --> 37:28.400] And this is what happens to people. They take advantage of that. [37:28.400 --> 37:35.400] And what I'm trying to do is demonstrate to people that you can wind up like Jane. [37:35.400 --> 37:42.400] She just kicked their behinds in court. Now she's in the process of going back after them. [37:42.400 --> 37:50.400] But keep telling people the best fight to have is the one you picked. Amen. [37:50.400 --> 38:00.400] I picked a fight with all the highest judges in Texas. Now, how the heck can I do that when I'm nobody? [38:00.400 --> 38:07.400] I'm 74 years old. I'm retired. I live on 800 bucks a month. [38:07.400 --> 38:17.400] I live in a 100 year old house in a small town in Podunk, Texas. Who the heck am I? [38:17.400 --> 38:22.400] I'm nobody. No, you're the most powerful motor scooter, remember? [38:22.400 --> 38:27.400] Exactly. I'm a citizen in a republic. [38:27.400 --> 38:33.400] Everybody answers to me. It wouldn't matter if I was homeless. [38:33.400 --> 38:39.400] Sleeping under a shopping cart on the corner somewhere in Dallas. [38:39.400 --> 38:46.400] I'm still the baddest motor scooter in the building. [38:46.400 --> 38:52.400] We can do that. I'm one guy in 29 million who sued these guys for this. [38:52.400 --> 39:00.400] They've been screwing everybody over forever. And now I got all of these judges. [39:00.400 --> 39:08.400] I sue them, and they say, ah, this is just another two bit pro se tooting his horn. [39:08.400 --> 39:12.400] And they get this chump to file them a response. [39:12.400 --> 39:15.400] The first thing I do is I bar grieve them all. [39:15.400 --> 39:21.400] I got this list of lawyers, and this guy Dorfman was on the bottom. [39:21.400 --> 39:28.400] The top one was the lawyer who is now the acting attorney general. [39:28.400 --> 39:34.400] I just sent four or five bar grievances against her telling the bar [39:34.400 --> 39:39.400] that they ought to be ashamed of themselves for what they did. [39:39.400 --> 39:43.400] I wrote that to be as insulting as possible. [39:43.400 --> 39:46.400] Yes, in such a polite way. [39:46.400 --> 39:51.400] Yeah. Self-righteous indignation. [39:51.400 --> 39:59.400] And these judges, I sued them each for $20 million a piece, [39:59.400 --> 40:03.400] and I sued them in their personal capacity. [40:03.400 --> 40:09.400] So they get their lawyers to respond to a federal suit, [40:09.400 --> 40:14.400] an allegation of RICO, Ongoing Criminal Enterprise, [40:14.400 --> 40:18.400] and they respond with state immunity. [40:18.400 --> 40:25.400] And the American Bar Association standards for professional, [40:25.400 --> 40:32.400] standards of professional conduct, 3.3 A2, [40:32.400 --> 40:37.400] tells them specifically if there is contradictory case law [40:37.400 --> 40:44.400] and the other party does not reference it, you must bring it up. [40:44.400 --> 40:47.400] And they didn't. [40:47.400 --> 40:51.400] So I stick my boot up their behinds. [40:51.400 --> 40:53.400] A two-bit pro se. [40:53.400 --> 40:55.400] And it wasn't hard for me to figure that out. [40:55.400 --> 40:56.400] It actually kind of was. [40:56.400 --> 41:00.400] A friend of mine sent me that case. [41:00.400 --> 41:04.400] But you guys all have that case now. [41:04.400 --> 41:10.400] I was driving home from Fort Worth yesterday at 4.30, [41:10.400 --> 41:13.400] so I'm in a little town 30 miles out of Fort Worth, [41:13.400 --> 41:15.400] and we're getting major traffic jams. [41:15.400 --> 41:18.400] So many people are pulling in, are moving in. [41:18.400 --> 41:19.400] So I'm in this line of traffic, [41:19.400 --> 41:23.400] and in front of me there's a sheriff's deputy car. [41:23.400 --> 41:27.400] And we're sitting in stop traffic about a half a mile from the red light, [41:27.400 --> 41:33.400] and he pulls out on the shoulder and accelerates down the shoulder. [41:33.400 --> 41:34.400] The cop does? [41:34.400 --> 41:35.400] Yeah, the cop does. [41:35.400 --> 41:40.400] So I get a quarter mile up, and there he's sitting in front of City Hall. [41:40.400 --> 41:44.400] So I pull in, get out, walk up to his car, [41:44.400 --> 41:46.400] and he rolls down the window. [41:46.400 --> 41:48.400] Do you have a card? [41:48.400 --> 41:49.400] He said, what are you talking about? [41:49.400 --> 41:51.400] I need a card with your name on it. [41:51.400 --> 41:54.400] I need you to identify yourself. [41:54.400 --> 41:55.400] He said, I'm not going to identify myself. [41:55.400 --> 41:57.400] Why do you want to know who I am? [41:57.400 --> 41:59.400] I said, you drove down there on the shoulder. [41:59.400 --> 42:01.400] That was reckless driving. [42:01.400 --> 42:04.400] And he laughed at me. [42:04.400 --> 42:07.400] Oh, you think I'm funny, do you, bubba? [42:07.400 --> 42:09.400] I go inside and ask for some policemen. [42:09.400 --> 42:11.400] They send two cops out. [42:11.400 --> 42:13.400] They said, what can we do for you? [42:13.400 --> 42:18.400] I told you to arrest that fat guy over there. [42:18.400 --> 42:21.400] And before they come out, he was getting real aggressive with me. [42:21.400 --> 42:22.400] And I told him, shut the hell up. [42:22.400 --> 42:27.400] Get your fat ass back in that car. [42:27.400 --> 42:28.400] You get in your car. [42:28.400 --> 42:30.400] I'm not getting anywhere. [42:30.400 --> 42:32.400] You get the heck out of here. [42:32.400 --> 42:33.400] Well, just what is your problem? [42:33.400 --> 42:35.400] I'm not telling you. [42:35.400 --> 42:36.400] You're the perp. [42:36.400 --> 42:37.400] You're the criminal. [42:37.400 --> 42:38.400] I'm not talking to the criminal. [42:38.400 --> 42:40.400] Get the hell away from me. [42:40.400 --> 42:42.400] I was having fun with him. [42:42.400 --> 42:44.400] And when they come out, what can I do for you? [42:44.400 --> 42:47.400] Arrest that fat guy over there. [42:47.400 --> 42:51.400] And they thought it was funny. [42:51.400 --> 42:52.400] And they would arrest him. [42:52.400 --> 42:56.400] They wouldn't take my complaint against him. [42:56.400 --> 43:02.400] So this morning, I took four criminal complaints against these two officers, [43:02.400 --> 43:04.400] the two that came out. [43:04.400 --> 43:12.400] I charged them with official oppression, 3903, and shielding from prosecution, 3805. [43:12.400 --> 43:14.400] And that one's a felony. [43:14.400 --> 43:15.400] Oh, good. [43:15.400 --> 43:17.400] I'm glad to hear that. [43:17.400 --> 43:20.400] But that's not the good part. [43:20.400 --> 43:24.400] I played them like a couple of cheap fiddles. [43:24.400 --> 43:27.400] I don't care about these chumps. [43:27.400 --> 43:34.400] They're going to give me a RICO suit against the county that I live in. [43:34.400 --> 43:37.400] And I'm going to get to start this RICO suit, [43:37.400 --> 43:44.400] because they wouldn't take my complaint of reckless driving against a sheriff's deputy. [43:44.400 --> 43:47.400] How nitpicking is that? [43:47.400 --> 43:49.400] Yeah. [43:49.400 --> 43:50.400] Hang on. [43:50.400 --> 43:53.400] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [43:53.400 --> 43:59.400] We'll be right back. [44:23.400 --> 44:24.400] Yes. [44:24.400 --> 44:27.400] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos. [44:27.400 --> 44:29.400] You can order your supplies or holiday gifts. [44:29.400 --> 44:31.400] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [44:31.400 --> 44:34.400] Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. [44:34.400 --> 44:37.400] Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [44:37.400 --> 44:43.400] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. [44:43.400 --> 44:44.400] Do I pay extra? [44:44.400 --> 44:45.400] No. [44:45.400 --> 44:47.400] Do I have to do anything different when I order? [44:47.400 --> 44:48.400] No. [44:48.400 --> 44:49.400] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [44:49.400 --> 44:50.400] No. [44:50.400 --> 44:51.400] I mean, yes. [44:51.400 --> 44:55.400] Giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. [44:55.400 --> 44:56.400] Thank you so much. [44:56.400 --> 44:57.400] You're welcome. [44:57.400 --> 45:00.400] Happy holidays, Logos. [45:00.400 --> 45:03.400] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:03.400 --> 45:07.400] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, [45:07.400 --> 45:15.400] the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [45:15.400 --> 45:19.400] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:19.400 --> 45:23.400] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.400 --> 45:28.400] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. [45:28.400 --> 45:34.400] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [45:34.400 --> 45:39.400] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:39.400 --> 45:43.400] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.400 --> 45:49.400] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.400 --> 45:52.400] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.400 --> 46:14.400] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ. [46:14.400 --> 46:25.400] If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? If you could not wage any battle, would your purpose be done? [46:25.400 --> 46:31.400] Such a sentimental soldier, a warrior of love, scuffling to keep the peace. [46:31.400 --> 46:37.400] All they're taking is a misunderstanding, and somebody calls the police. [46:37.400 --> 46:55.400] Watching the sparks fly, watching the sparks fly, watching the sparks fly, watching the sparks fly, watching the sparks fly. [46:55.400 --> 46:58.400] Okay. Okay. We are back. [46:58.400 --> 47:00.400] Brandon Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio. [47:00.400 --> 47:02.400] And it sounds like I'm having fun. [47:02.400 --> 47:03.400] Yeah. [47:03.400 --> 47:06.400] I am having fun. [47:06.400 --> 47:12.400] These cops are laughing at me when I'm trying to get him to take a criminal complaint. [47:12.400 --> 47:16.400] And I'm thinking, this one cop, his name was gross. [47:16.400 --> 47:21.400] He had to be six foot four, 400 pounds. [47:21.400 --> 47:25.400] He was one big boy. [47:25.400 --> 47:29.400] And the other cop was about five foot four, maybe 140 pounds. [47:29.400 --> 47:32.400] He was a little guy. [47:32.400 --> 47:36.400] And the sheriff's deputy who wouldn't give me his name, he wasn't in uniform. [47:36.400 --> 47:38.400] He's in a red shirt. [47:38.400 --> 47:43.400] So what I'm going to do, he had a round head. [47:43.400 --> 47:52.400] So I'm going to call him tick head. [47:52.400 --> 47:59.400] So I don't know who he was because he wouldn't identify himself, but he was kind of heavy built. [47:59.400 --> 48:08.400] He wasn't really obese, but he was heavy built and he had a really rounded head, kind of the shape of a tick. [48:08.400 --> 48:12.400] So I'll just refer to him as tick head. [48:12.400 --> 48:14.400] Oh my, he's going to love that. [48:14.400 --> 48:18.400] I hope so. [48:18.400 --> 48:21.400] They don't get it. [48:21.400 --> 48:24.400] They didn't get it. [48:24.400 --> 48:34.400] They think all proceeds are just angry people who jump up and down in real and righteous indignation and then go away. [48:34.400 --> 48:43.400] So today I went to the police department and gave them four criminal affidavits against these police officers. [48:43.400 --> 48:46.400] And I don't care about the police officers. [48:46.400 --> 49:01.400] When the chief of police doesn't give these to some magistrate, the way 12.13 paragraph C commands him to do. [49:01.400 --> 49:06.400] Oh, I also listed 2.13 in the complaint. [49:06.400 --> 49:08.400] Let me pull it up. [49:08.400 --> 49:15.400] 18 U.S. Code 1512, I think is what it was. [49:15.400 --> 49:19.400] And that makes it a federal crime. [49:19.400 --> 49:20.400] Let me bring that up. [49:20.400 --> 49:23.400] Will you look up 1512 when I'm talking? [49:23.400 --> 49:24.400] Sure. [49:24.400 --> 49:27.400] 18 U.S. Code 1512. [49:27.400 --> 49:44.400] If someone interferes with the enforcement of a law. [49:44.400 --> 49:49.400] 1512 here looks like it's going to tampering with a witness, victim, or informant. [49:49.400 --> 49:51.400] Yes. [49:51.400 --> 49:54.400] I've actually got it quoted. [49:54.400 --> 49:56.400] Oh, I have it quoted in my criminal complaint. [49:56.400 --> 50:00.400] Oh, here it is right here. [50:00.400 --> 50:01.400] Okay. [50:01.400 --> 50:03.400] Here's what I said in the complaint. [50:03.400 --> 50:06.400] If I can get this thing to come up. [50:06.400 --> 50:07.400] Okay. [50:07.400 --> 50:10.400] Here it is. [50:10.400 --> 50:12.400] Okay. [50:12.400 --> 50:18.400] 18 U.S. Code 1511, which reads in pertinent part as follows. [50:18.400 --> 50:26.400] It shall be unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to obstruct the enforcement of [50:26.400 --> 50:33.400] the criminal laws of a state or political subject division thereof with the intent to [50:33.400 --> 50:37.400] facilitate an illegal gambling business. [50:37.400 --> 50:40.400] Oh, well, I should have read all that. [50:40.400 --> 50:42.400] If one or more persons. [50:42.400 --> 50:45.400] Oh, well, I screwed that up. [50:45.400 --> 50:51.400] I was having too much fun. [50:51.400 --> 50:53.400] I didn't read the whole thing. [50:53.400 --> 50:54.400] One quick note. [50:54.400 --> 50:58.400] I think it is good for our listeners to understand. [50:58.400 --> 51:04.400] A lot of times people will find in their efforts to get themselves off the hook usually, but [51:04.400 --> 51:11.400] they'll find something here in this title 18 in the Fed and they'll say, Hey, this person, [51:11.400 --> 51:17.400] this public official violated title 18 something, something, and they're thinking that that [51:17.400 --> 51:21.400] is a valid argument as to why they shouldn't be held to stand and answer for whatever it [51:21.400 --> 51:22.400] is. [51:22.400 --> 51:30.400] And just to point out, so everybody's really clear, these are two completely separate tracks. [51:30.400 --> 51:37.400] You being held accountable for something that you allegedly did and you holding them [51:37.400 --> 51:41.400] accountable for what they allegedly did. [51:41.400 --> 51:44.400] And this particular one, title 18 is a federal thing. [51:44.400 --> 51:47.400] So you take that issue to a federal court. [51:47.400 --> 51:49.400] You don't take it to a state court. [51:49.400 --> 51:55.400] So if the state's come holding you accountable for, you know, parking violation or for whatever [51:55.400 --> 52:02.400] it is, traffic, something or other, or for theft, like Jane, you had some, your neighbor [52:02.400 --> 52:06.400] was trying to accuse you that you stole something and actually you didn't. [52:06.400 --> 52:13.400] But that was a state issue, even though you could find tons of things that she may have [52:13.400 --> 52:15.400] violated in the Fed. [52:15.400 --> 52:20.400] You don't bring those up and you don't take them to a state court anyway. [52:20.400 --> 52:21.400] Right. [52:21.400 --> 52:24.400] So just, just so everybody knows that's totally separate. [52:24.400 --> 52:25.400] Okay. [52:25.400 --> 52:29.400] And then what I should have used is 18 US code two 42. [52:29.400 --> 52:34.400] I found that one and somehow I missed that gambling part about it. [52:34.400 --> 52:38.400] Okay. 18 US code two 42 deprivation of rights. [52:38.400 --> 52:44.400] Whoever under the color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom willfully [52:44.400 --> 52:51.400] subjects any person in any state, territory, Commonwealth possession or district to the [52:51.400 --> 52:57.400] deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunity secured or protected by the constitutional [52:57.400 --> 53:02.400] laws of the United States or to different punishments, pains or penalties on account [53:02.400 --> 53:10.400] of such person being an alien or by reason of his color race or race than are prescribed [53:10.400 --> 53:15.400] for the punishment of citizens shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more [53:15.400 --> 53:17.400] than one year or both. [53:17.400 --> 53:21.400] And if bodily injury results from the acts committed in the violation of this section [53:21.400 --> 53:27.400] or if such an act included the use of attempted or attempted use or threatened use of a [53:27.400 --> 53:34.400] dangerous weapon, they had pistols on, uh, anyway, I won't read all the rest of that. [53:34.400 --> 53:35.400] That's official misconduct. [53:35.400 --> 53:40.400] That's official oppression in Texas is official oppression in the fed. [53:40.400 --> 53:42.400] It's a crime. [53:42.400 --> 53:44.400] That's the one I should have used. [53:44.400 --> 53:46.400] I was having too much fun this morning. [53:46.400 --> 53:51.400] Well, that and two 41 also, when you were talking about conspiracy, that goes to, did [53:51.400 --> 53:54.400] two or more do this together? [53:54.400 --> 53:58.400] So, yeah, there were, there were two of them, fortunately. [53:58.400 --> 53:59.400] Yes. [53:59.400 --> 54:03.400] So I will, I will apologize to the chief. [54:03.400 --> 54:07.400] My bad cited wrong case law, wrong statute. [54:07.400 --> 54:08.400] I'll go back. [54:08.400 --> 54:13.400] Here's another chance with two 42. [54:13.400 --> 54:20.400] But point of this is I'm the one in control here. [54:20.400 --> 54:29.400] The chief of police has to deal with me and he will do what the law commands him to do. [54:29.400 --> 54:34.400] If you've listened to my show a while, you've probably heard me say, never ask a public [54:34.400 --> 54:40.400] official to do anything you actually want them to do. [54:40.400 --> 54:47.400] I asked these policemen to arrest this other, the sheriff's deputy, and they thought that [54:47.400 --> 54:50.400] was kind of funny. [54:50.400 --> 54:53.400] We'll see how that funny that is, Bubba. [54:53.400 --> 55:02.400] So now I'm asking the chief of police, their boss, to take verified criminal complaints [55:02.400 --> 55:07.400] against them and give it to some magistrate. [55:07.400 --> 55:14.400] And the reason I'm doing that is because I asked these two to take criminal, verified [55:14.400 --> 55:21.400] criminal affidavits against this tick head sheriff's deputy and give it to some magistrate. [55:21.400 --> 55:27.400] Now, Randy, you would think that when the police chief sees this, he's going to think [55:27.400 --> 55:32.400] a little bit ahead, connect a couple of dots and say, hmm, if I don't do this, he's going [55:32.400 --> 55:36.400] to put another complaint to somebody else with my name on it. [55:36.400 --> 55:40.400] But it seems like they never quite go that far and put that together. [55:40.400 --> 55:47.400] They are so arrogant that they think they're absolutely protected. [55:47.400 --> 55:53.400] And this is what's caused our rift between the public and the police. [55:53.400 --> 55:58.400] These two officers that come out didn't know who I was. [55:58.400 --> 56:04.400] Now, there are officers in that department who are going to tell them who I am. [56:04.400 --> 56:12.400] And they're going to say, you messed with him, you guys, you are in trouble. [56:12.400 --> 56:15.400] But they didn't know who I was. [56:15.400 --> 56:18.400] But they're going to find out. [56:18.400 --> 56:24.400] And I'm telling all of you, I'm not anything unusual. [56:24.400 --> 56:25.400] I'm nobody. [56:25.400 --> 56:32.400] I'm a retired old man who lives on a pension, 800 bucks a month. [56:32.400 --> 56:34.400] What about your Social Security? [56:34.400 --> 56:36.400] You don't get that? [56:36.400 --> 56:37.400] Do what? [56:37.400 --> 56:40.400] You don't get Social Security? [56:40.400 --> 56:41.400] Yeah. [56:41.400 --> 56:42.400] OK. [56:42.400 --> 56:46.400] But you're talking about that included in the $800? [56:46.400 --> 56:47.400] Yeah. [56:47.400 --> 56:54.400] Well, I actually get $1,000, but a couple hundred goes to Medicare. [56:54.400 --> 56:56.400] So I get $830 a month from Social Security. [56:56.400 --> 56:58.400] That's what I live on. [56:58.400 --> 57:02.400] I'm nobody. [57:02.400 --> 57:04.400] I'm nothing. [57:04.400 --> 57:10.400] But I am the baddest motor scooter in the building. [57:10.400 --> 57:19.400] And so if you guys are out there to make more money than I do, what's your problem? [57:19.400 --> 57:24.400] Why are you sitting back letting these guys do all this crap? [57:24.400 --> 57:30.400] And the best part is you're missing out on all the fun. [57:30.400 --> 57:36.400] These guys laughing, ha ha ha, I'm not going to take a complaint. [57:36.400 --> 57:43.400] And I looked up at this big guy and said, well, Bubba, we'll see how that works out for you. [57:43.400 --> 57:52.400] And you know, when we get in an interaction like this, we want to come out feeling like we're on the top. [57:52.400 --> 57:55.400] No, don't do that. [57:55.400 --> 58:00.400] Let them think they got how they handle you. [58:00.400 --> 58:05.400] The best way to get somebody is not straightforward. [58:05.400 --> 58:12.400] But the next day or the day after, when the chief of police comes to them and says, hey, [58:12.400 --> 58:18.400] why have I got this guy trying to get me to file criminal complaints against you with the local JP? [58:18.400 --> 58:21.400] What the heck did you do? [58:21.400 --> 58:30.400] When I get them, I don't want them to know I got them until somebody else hammers them. [58:30.400 --> 58:36.400] OK, I don't get to see the look on their face, but I get to imagine what it looks like. [58:36.400 --> 58:38.400] And that's way more satisfying. [58:38.400 --> 58:42.400] Hang on, Randy Carlton, Red Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio. [58:42.400 --> 58:45.400] We'll be right back. [58:45.400 --> 58:48.400] And when we come back, I'll stop yacking on this. [58:48.400 --> 58:50.400] We'll go to our college. [58:50.400 --> 58:55.400] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated [58:55.400 --> 58:58.400] because they struggle to understand it. [58:58.400 --> 59:01.400] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, [59:01.400 --> 59:06.400] but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. [59:06.400 --> 59:09.400] Enter the recovery version. [59:09.400 --> 59:13.400] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, [59:13.400 --> 59:18.400] but the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes. [59:18.400 --> 59:22.400] The difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, [59:22.400 --> 59:28.400] providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [59:28.400 --> 59:33.400] Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [59:33.400 --> 59:43.400] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [59:43.400 --> 59:48.400] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [59:48.400 --> 59:53.400] That's freestudybible.com. [59:53.400 --> 01:00:02.400] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:02.400 --> 01:00:06.400] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:06.400 --> 01:00:09.400] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:00:09.400 --> 01:00:11.400] Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:11.400 --> 01:00:14.400] I'm your Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:00:14.400 --> 01:00:17.400] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:17.400 --> 01:00:19.400] Privacy is under attack. [01:00:19.400 --> 01:00:22.400] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:22.400 --> 01:00:27.400] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:27.400 --> 01:00:29.400] So protect your rights. [01:00:29.400 --> 01:00:32.400] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:32.400 --> 01:00:35.400] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:00:35.400 --> 01:00:38.400] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [01:00:38.400 --> 01:00:42.400] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:00:42.400 --> 01:00:45.400] Start over with Startpage. [01:00:45.400 --> 01:00:48.400] Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed. [01:00:48.400 --> 01:00:51.400] They pull back the covers and find a third party there. [01:00:51.400 --> 01:00:54.400] He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight. [01:00:54.400 --> 01:00:58.400] That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me [01:00:58.400 --> 01:01:00.400] what the Third Amendment was designed to prevent. [01:01:00.400 --> 01:01:03.400] It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, [01:01:03.400 --> 01:01:06.400] a common demand in the days of our founding fathers. [01:01:06.400 --> 01:01:09.400] Third party, Third Amendment? Get it? [01:01:09.400 --> 01:01:12.400] So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, [01:01:12.400 --> 01:01:17.400] tell them to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment. [01:01:17.400 --> 01:01:21.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:31.400 --> 01:01:35.400] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:01:35.400 --> 01:01:38.400] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:01:38.400 --> 01:01:40.400] Our liberty depends on it. [01:01:40.400 --> 01:01:43.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way [01:01:43.400 --> 01:01:46.400] to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:01:46.400 --> 01:01:48.400] Privacy is under attack. [01:01:48.400 --> 01:01:52.400] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:01:52.400 --> 01:01:57.400] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:01:57.400 --> 01:01:58.400] So protect your rights. [01:01:58.400 --> 01:02:02.400] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:02:02.400 --> 01:02:05.400] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:02:05.400 --> 01:02:08.400] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, [01:02:08.400 --> 01:02:12.400] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:02:12.400 --> 01:02:16.400] Start over with Startpage. [01:02:16.400 --> 01:02:20.400] Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, [01:02:20.400 --> 01:02:22.400] or a pair of x-ray goggles. [01:02:22.400 --> 01:02:25.400] That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans [01:02:25.400 --> 01:02:27.400] freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. [01:02:27.400 --> 01:02:31.400] Fourth Amendment? Four eyes staring at you? Get it? [01:02:31.400 --> 01:02:34.400] Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights [01:02:34.400 --> 01:02:35.400] in the name of security. [01:02:35.400 --> 01:02:40.400] Case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing. [01:02:40.400 --> 01:02:44.400] When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, [01:02:44.400 --> 01:02:47.400] I say it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells. [01:02:47.400 --> 01:02:50.400] Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights [01:02:50.400 --> 01:02:54.400] and use their googly eyes to take a gander at the Fourth. [01:02:54.400 --> 01:02:55.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:02:55.400 --> 01:03:01.400] For more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:25.400 --> 01:03:42.400] Okay. [01:03:42.400 --> 01:03:43.400] We are back. [01:03:43.400 --> 01:03:44.400] Randy Kelton. [01:03:44.400 --> 01:03:49.400] We've already gone on this Thursday. [01:03:49.400 --> 01:03:52.400] The, was it the 10th? [01:03:52.400 --> 01:03:55.400] The 10th of August. [01:03:55.400 --> 01:03:58.400] August, 2023. [01:03:58.400 --> 01:04:08.400] And I guess if I sound like I'm having fun, it's because I am. [01:04:08.400 --> 01:04:10.400] I have these people dragging on you. [01:04:10.400 --> 01:04:13.400] You know, if you've been listening to the show, [01:04:13.400 --> 01:04:18.400] I've had this problem with all of my picture IDs expiring, [01:04:18.400 --> 01:04:23.400] they revoked my license and I couldn't drive for two or three months. [01:04:23.400 --> 01:04:25.400] I had to have people drive me around. [01:04:25.400 --> 01:04:28.400] What a pain in the butt that was. [01:04:28.400 --> 01:04:33.400] I finally get that taken care of and now I'm coming after them. [01:04:33.400 --> 01:04:39.400] It is so much fun. [01:04:39.400 --> 01:04:40.400] Actually, it was too much fun. [01:04:40.400 --> 01:04:43.400] I was having too much fun this morning when I was writing those criminal [01:04:43.400 --> 01:04:45.400] complaints against these officers. [01:04:45.400 --> 01:04:51.400] I was having too much fun. [01:04:51.400 --> 01:04:54.400] I was writing that complaint that wouldn't take my complaint that I [01:04:54.400 --> 01:04:56.400] didn't read the statute carefully. [01:04:56.400 --> 01:04:59.400] So I'll go back tomorrow and apologize to the chief. [01:04:59.400 --> 01:05:01.400] Oh my bad. I screwed up. [01:05:01.400 --> 01:05:04.400] Here's the right one that you need. [01:05:04.400 --> 01:05:05.400] But. [01:05:05.400 --> 01:05:09.400] You need to. [01:05:09.400 --> 01:05:13.400] Thanks a lot. [01:05:13.400 --> 01:05:23.020] You need to make a federal claim against him and most anything he does that you could charge [01:05:23.020 --> 01:05:29.020] him for in the state, you could also charge him for in the Fed. [01:05:29.020 --> 01:05:36.500] Now when he reads this complaint and sees my federal claim in the complaint, he won't [01:05:36.500 --> 01:05:40.660] have a clue as to why that's there. [01:05:40.660 --> 01:05:44.160] But he'll find out later. [01:05:44.160 --> 01:05:48.140] It's there because of the Young Doctrine. [01:05:48.140 --> 01:05:59.020] The Young Doctrine says that the state may not immunize its employees, its officials [01:05:59.020 --> 01:06:04.320] from violations of federal law. [01:06:04.320 --> 01:06:07.760] He doesn't know that now, he doesn't have a clue. [01:06:07.760 --> 01:06:11.740] He'll see it in there, but he won't have a clue as to why it's there. [01:06:11.740 --> 01:06:18.580] But later when we come back after him and we sue him in the Fed, he's going to remember [01:06:18.580 --> 01:06:26.220] that we noticed that federal charge. [01:06:26.220 --> 01:06:29.400] He set me up for that. [01:06:29.400 --> 01:06:32.940] He knew exactly where he was taking me. [01:06:32.940 --> 01:06:34.820] That's what I want him to feel. [01:06:34.820 --> 01:06:40.500] Yeah, then he'll have a little fright moment. [01:06:40.500 --> 01:06:46.820] We want them to feel vulnerable to us. [01:06:46.820 --> 01:06:52.540] They want us to feel vulnerable to them. [01:06:52.540 --> 01:07:00.480] If we are to have equity and justice, the police must feel as vulnerable to us as we [01:07:00.480 --> 01:07:02.180] do to them. [01:07:02.180 --> 01:07:07.300] It is not a problem for them feeling vulnerable to us. [01:07:07.300 --> 01:07:13.380] Because if they feel vulnerable, then they will exercise caution. [01:07:13.380 --> 01:07:20.860] They will conduct themselves in a professional and business-like manner to avoid us having [01:07:20.860 --> 01:07:24.300] a claim against them. [01:07:24.300 --> 01:07:27.300] That's exactly what we want. [01:07:27.300 --> 01:07:31.900] I don't want the policeman to cut me any slack. [01:07:31.900 --> 01:07:35.340] I want him to do his job. [01:07:35.340 --> 01:07:43.220] But I want him to do his job precisely the way the law commands him to do his job. [01:07:43.220 --> 01:07:50.020] And I want him to treat me with dignity and respect, the dignity and respect that he owes [01:07:50.020 --> 01:07:52.020] to his master. [01:07:52.020 --> 01:07:56.500] We can do that. [01:07:56.500 --> 01:08:01.280] And you don't have to be anybody. [01:08:01.280 --> 01:08:05.060] You just have to be a citizen, and that's enough. [01:08:05.060 --> 01:08:12.060] We have all these patriots out there that want to give up their citizenship. [01:08:12.060 --> 01:08:15.180] Good luck, guys. [01:08:15.180 --> 01:08:16.520] You become nothing. [01:08:16.520 --> 01:08:21.140] You become a non-entity. [01:08:21.140 --> 01:08:25.340] I am a citizen, and I will stay a citizen. [01:08:25.340 --> 01:08:32.220] I will claim and demand my citizenship, and they will respect my citizenship, so we will [01:08:32.220 --> 01:08:33.220] dance in the courts. [01:08:33.220 --> 01:08:34.220] OK. [01:08:34.220 --> 01:08:35.980] I'm going to stop talking about this. [01:08:35.980 --> 01:08:40.020] I'm used up half the show. [01:08:40.020 --> 01:08:46.940] But it's important we understand, we're the baddest motor scooter in the building. [01:08:46.940 --> 01:08:52.620] OK, Jane, since I already have you up, what do you have for us today? [01:08:52.620 --> 01:08:58.340] Well, I have written you a question on Telegram, but now I think I've found the answer. [01:08:58.340 --> 01:08:59.660] Well, I might have. [01:08:59.660 --> 01:09:00.660] I don't know. [01:09:00.660 --> 01:09:05.260] You know, I told you the other night that I had to think about things, and there was [01:09:05.260 --> 01:09:06.700] a couple of things that you said. [01:09:06.700 --> 01:09:10.900] One of them, you said, remove this case I had going in Fort Worth to the federal court. [01:09:10.900 --> 01:09:19.900] But then the other thing you said was take it to the appeals court to remove it out of [01:09:19.900 --> 01:09:26.140] the challenge, the subject matter jurisdiction of the appeals court, which also and at the [01:09:26.140 --> 01:09:29.660] same time challenge the jurisdiction of the municipal court. [01:09:29.660 --> 01:09:30.660] So do I do that? [01:09:30.660 --> 01:09:32.780] Let me let me stop you right here. [01:09:32.780 --> 01:09:33.780] OK. [01:09:33.780 --> 01:09:42.340] I want to point out to everybody else that I'm really pleased that Jane got that. [01:09:42.340 --> 01:09:51.040] If the trial court does not have jurisdiction, then you can appeal to the appellate court [01:09:51.040 --> 01:09:56.260] and tell the appellate court you don't have jurisdiction. [01:09:56.260 --> 01:10:03.820] The reason you don't have jurisdiction is because the trial court did not have jurisdiction. [01:10:03.820 --> 01:10:09.980] And we want you to rule that you don't have jurisdiction because the trial court didn't [01:10:09.980 --> 01:10:12.460] have jurisdiction. [01:10:12.460 --> 01:10:15.460] That's a really important distinction. [01:10:15.460 --> 01:10:16.460] OK. [01:10:16.460 --> 01:10:19.700] Clearly, Jane, you got that. [01:10:19.700 --> 01:10:26.540] Well, I did get that in a way, except for I'm thinking whenever they get it and they're [01:10:26.540 --> 01:10:32.740] going to say, well, we don't have jurisdiction because it hasn't been heard in the municipal [01:10:32.740 --> 01:10:34.620] court yet and it's not been ruled on. [01:10:34.620 --> 01:10:36.580] Like there's no order or anything. [01:10:36.580 --> 01:10:39.260] No, no, that's not how it works. [01:10:39.260 --> 01:10:44.020] I mean, but there's not, though, I'm just saying. [01:10:44.020 --> 01:10:45.020] OK. [01:10:45.020 --> 01:10:46.020] OK, go ahead. [01:10:46.020 --> 01:10:47.020] OK. [01:10:47.020 --> 01:10:51.540] Jurisdiction means that this court does not have standing to hear the case in the first [01:10:51.540 --> 01:10:54.460] place. [01:10:54.460 --> 01:11:00.460] So the Court of Appeals is not going to say, well, you can't come to us because the other [01:11:00.460 --> 01:11:01.460] court didn't rule. [01:11:01.460 --> 01:11:07.020] No, no, no, you're saying the other court can't get past the threshold of the court [01:11:07.020 --> 01:11:09.900] door. [01:11:09.900 --> 01:11:14.100] They can walk up to the door, but they can't step across the threshold. [01:11:14.100 --> 01:11:15.940] So they can't rule. [01:11:15.940 --> 01:11:18.780] If they try to rule, they're acting improperly. [01:11:18.780 --> 01:11:23.540] And you go to them and say, you don't have jurisdiction and we need you to rule that [01:11:23.540 --> 01:11:28.900] you don't have jurisdiction because they didn't have jurisdiction. [01:11:28.900 --> 01:11:31.820] So it's kind of it sounds contradictory. [01:11:31.820 --> 01:11:37.260] You're telling the appellate court that they don't have jurisdiction to hear your appeal, [01:11:37.260 --> 01:11:38.860] and that's not really what you're saying. [01:11:38.860 --> 01:11:42.500] No, no, no, because it's not an appeal, for one. [01:11:42.500 --> 01:11:44.620] It's not an appeal. [01:11:44.620 --> 01:11:47.260] Did you go to the appellate court with a writ of mandamus? [01:11:47.260 --> 01:11:49.540] No, that's what I'm working on now. [01:11:49.540 --> 01:11:56.060] What I'm saying is I can't go from when I did last writ of mandamus for the second trespass, [01:11:56.060 --> 01:11:57.540] for the cat trap. [01:11:57.540 --> 01:12:00.300] OK, hold on, hold on. [01:12:00.300 --> 01:12:11.020] If the trial court does not have jurisdiction and they attempt to exert jurisdiction, then [01:12:11.020 --> 01:12:19.580] you're open to go to the appellate court with a petition for writ of mandamus. [01:12:19.580 --> 01:12:22.980] And that's what I'm going to work on, just need to know how to do that. [01:12:22.980 --> 01:12:24.220] OK, OK, hold on, Jane. [01:12:24.220 --> 01:12:26.180] I'm not talking to you, really. [01:12:26.180 --> 01:12:28.020] You really you already know this. [01:12:28.020 --> 01:12:30.580] I'm talking to everybody else. [01:12:30.580 --> 01:12:34.620] You go to the court of appeals for writ of mandamus and you ask the court of appeals [01:12:34.620 --> 01:12:41.980] to say we as the court of appeals don't have jurisdiction because the trial court never [01:12:41.980 --> 01:12:46.300] had jurisdiction. [01:12:46.300 --> 01:12:47.620] We've done that before. [01:12:47.620 --> 01:12:56.680] So the appellate court can they have standing to issue this ruling? [01:12:56.680 --> 01:13:02.860] They technically don't have jurisdiction, but they do have standing to issue a ruling [01:13:02.860 --> 01:13:08.580] stating that they don't have jurisdiction and because they don't they don't have jurisdiction [01:13:08.580 --> 01:13:15.540] because the trial court did not have jurisdiction that could transfer to them. [01:13:15.540 --> 01:13:21.400] We did this in a case in Newark where they were prosecuting someone for violations of [01:13:21.400 --> 01:13:29.420] municipal ordinances and we argued that the municipal ordinances did not apply to a private [01:13:29.420 --> 01:13:32.220] citizen. [01:13:32.220 --> 01:13:39.220] And because they didn't apply, the trial court has no jurisdiction over the private citizen [01:13:39.220 --> 01:13:42.380] based on city ordinances. [01:13:42.380 --> 01:13:49.100] And because they didn't have jurisdiction, the court of appeals can't have jurisdiction [01:13:49.100 --> 01:13:56.940] either and we want the court of appeals to rule that they don't have jurisdiction because [01:13:56.940 --> 01:13:57.940] you don't have jurisdiction. [01:13:57.940 --> 01:14:02.580] But I want them to rule to dismiss the case. [01:14:02.580 --> 01:14:05.500] Hold on. [01:14:05.500 --> 01:14:10.860] That's what a determination of no jurisdiction does. [01:14:10.860 --> 01:14:11.860] Okay. [01:14:11.860 --> 01:14:15.100] The whole thing goes poof from the beginning. [01:14:15.100 --> 01:14:16.100] Okay. [01:14:16.100 --> 01:14:17.100] Okay. [01:14:17.100 --> 01:14:20.900] So there can be no case if the court has no jurisdiction. [01:14:20.900 --> 01:14:27.940] So are they going to say we don't have jurisdiction so therefore we dismiss this case? [01:14:27.940 --> 01:14:32.060] Yeah, that's exactly what the court did in this Newark case. [01:14:32.060 --> 01:14:36.020] That's the only thing they can do when they don't have jurisdiction. [01:14:36.020 --> 01:14:41.060] That's what we asked them to do, that we asked them to rule that we don't have jurisdiction [01:14:41.060 --> 01:14:42.820] because they don't have jurisdiction. [01:14:42.820 --> 01:14:48.900] The case is dismissed and that's exactly what they did. [01:14:48.900 --> 01:14:49.900] What about if there's facts? [01:14:49.900 --> 01:14:54.060] This is I'm thinking motion summary judgment, but what if there's facts that are undisputed? [01:14:54.060 --> 01:14:59.340] No, no, no, this does not go to summary judgment at all. [01:14:59.340 --> 01:15:01.580] Jurisdiction is different. [01:15:01.580 --> 01:15:08.020] Jurisdiction never allows the court to step across the threshold of the court door. [01:15:08.020 --> 01:15:13.220] They cannot get to the merits of the case. [01:15:13.220 --> 01:15:14.220] Okay. [01:15:14.220 --> 01:15:17.220] Maybe, how about if I read something? [01:15:17.220 --> 01:15:19.220] They can't get through the front door. [01:15:19.220 --> 01:15:20.220] Go ahead, Brett. [01:15:20.220 --> 01:15:21.220] Randy, what if I read something here? [01:15:21.220 --> 01:15:25.620] This is largely from Texas jurisprudence and it's about jurisdiction. [01:15:25.620 --> 01:15:35.940] This is what I brought to the district court when I had appealed from a traffic ticket [01:15:35.940 --> 01:15:40.580] and it was basically the same thing. [01:15:40.580 --> 01:15:45.900] I brought this in from Texas jurisprudence and the next day they declared the conviction [01:15:45.900 --> 01:15:46.900] void. [01:15:46.900 --> 01:15:47.900] Awesome. [01:15:47.900 --> 01:15:53.380] I just pulled this in and it says, jurisdiction and venue are not synonymous and I threw that [01:15:53.380 --> 01:15:59.760] in there because the guy was lying and saying it's all about venue and he wanted to stick [01:15:59.760 --> 01:16:01.340] it to territory. [01:16:01.340 --> 01:16:03.340] They do that often. [01:16:03.340 --> 01:16:09.980] I said, jurisdiction is the power of a court to decide a controversy between parties and [01:16:09.980 --> 01:16:15.460] to render and enforce a judgment with respect thereto, while venue is the proper place where [01:16:15.460 --> 01:16:17.940] that power is to be exercised. [01:16:17.940 --> 01:16:24.300] In other words, jurisdiction deals with the power of a court to determine an action involving [01:16:24.300 --> 01:16:30.620] particular subject matter as between parties and to render certain judgment, whereas venue [01:16:30.620 --> 01:16:36.420] deals with the propriety of prosecuting a suit involving given subject matter in specific [01:16:36.420 --> 01:16:41.740] parties in a particular county. [01:16:41.740 --> 01:16:46.580] For that reason, it was improper for the trial court to disregard the threshold issue of [01:16:46.580 --> 01:16:47.580] jurisdiction. [01:16:47.580 --> 01:16:50.940] But you obviously all reflected at one. [01:16:50.940 --> 01:16:53.220] We'll have to finish this on the other side. [01:16:53.220 --> 01:16:54.220] We'll continue. [01:16:54.220 --> 01:16:55.220] Hold on just a moment. [01:16:55.220 --> 01:17:01.060] We'll be right back. [01:17:01.060 --> 01:17:05.420] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [01:17:05.420 --> 01:17:06.420] Word? [01:17:06.420 --> 01:17:11.580] Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture [01:17:11.580 --> 01:17:17.980] Talk where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15. [01:17:17.980 --> 01:17:22.500] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly [01:17:22.500 --> 01:17:24.900] dividing the word of truth. [01:17:24.900 --> 01:17:28.860] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse [01:17:28.860 --> 01:17:32.180] by verse and discuss the true Gospel message. [01:17:32.180 --> 01:17:36.820] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [01:17:36.820 --> 01:17:39.180] and Christian character development. [01:17:39.180 --> 01:17:43.700] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [01:17:43.700 --> 01:17:48.020] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [01:17:48.020 --> 01:17:50.300] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [01:17:50.300 --> 01:17:56.940] So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and [01:17:56.940 --> 01:18:00.700] motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [01:18:00.700 --> 01:18:05.340] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:18:05.340 --> 01:18:09.540] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [01:18:09.540 --> 01:18:13.820] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you [01:18:13.820 --> 01:18:15.140] can win too. [01:18:15.140 --> 01:18:19.640] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [01:18:19.640 --> 01:18:25.420] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer [01:18:25.420 --> 01:18:30.060] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the [01:18:30.060 --> 01:18:34.260] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:18:34.260 --> 01:18:39.380] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:18:39.380 --> 01:18:41.340] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:18:41.340 --> 01:18:47.060] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [01:18:47.060 --> 01:18:49.980] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [01:18:49.980 --> 01:18:59.100] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [01:18:59.100 --> 01:19:00.100] collectors now. [01:19:00.100 --> 01:19:01.100] This is the Logos Radio Network. [01:19:01.100 --> 01:19:17.900] This is the Logos Logos Radio Network. [01:19:17.900 --> 01:19:34.700] This is the Logos Logos Radio Network. [01:19:34.700 --> 01:19:51.500] This is the Logos Logos Radio Network. [01:19:51.500 --> 01:20:06.060] Okay. [01:20:06.060 --> 01:20:07.060] We are back. [01:20:07.060 --> 01:20:09.900] Brent Kelton, Brent Fountain, rule of law radio. [01:20:09.900 --> 01:20:14.300] And when we went out, Brent was talking about how he was taking his guys on. [01:20:14.300 --> 01:20:16.300] Will you go ahead with that? [01:20:16.300 --> 01:20:24.300] Brent Kelton Yeah, we're just talking about jurisdiction, and the court not having jurisdiction [01:20:24.300 --> 01:20:27.300] from the beginning is a threshold issue. [01:20:27.300 --> 01:20:33.100] And, you know, Jane, you're talking about, does the appellate court have any jurisdiction [01:20:33.100 --> 01:20:37.020] to deal with the fact that the first one didn't have jurisdiction? [01:20:37.020 --> 01:20:38.360] And yes, they do. [01:20:38.360 --> 01:20:45.900] So another key piece here is that the, this is, I put in this in my pleading, the test [01:20:45.900 --> 01:20:52.940] of jurisdiction is whether the court had power to enter upon inquiry and not whether its [01:20:52.940 --> 01:20:56.740] conclusions were correct. [01:20:56.740 --> 01:21:00.340] So those two very distinct things going on, right? [01:21:00.340 --> 01:21:06.100] Did they have power to enter upon inquiry is different than whether their conclusions [01:21:06.100 --> 01:21:07.100] were correct. [01:21:07.100 --> 01:21:12.500] So then continuing, if the court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter, then [01:21:12.500 --> 01:21:17.880] its determination of the controversy is not void, no matter how erroneous the decision [01:21:17.880 --> 01:21:20.220] may be. [01:21:20.220 --> 01:21:24.540] That's when you do an appeal, but it's an appeal of the merits, I mean, I'm sorry, an [01:21:24.540 --> 01:21:29.660] appeal of reversible judicial error in how they handle things when they did their trial [01:21:29.660 --> 01:21:32.020] on the merits. [01:21:32.020 --> 01:21:34.940] But this is different. [01:21:34.940 --> 01:21:40.420] Judicial action without jurisdiction is void, period. [01:21:40.420 --> 01:21:43.460] Not voidable, but void ab initio, from the beginning. [01:21:43.460 --> 01:21:48.900] All right, so, well, there's a piece that may be helpful. [01:21:48.900 --> 01:21:49.900] Okay. [01:21:49.900 --> 01:21:56.620] And that void and voidable is an important distinction. [01:21:56.620 --> 01:22:04.900] If a judge renders a ruling, even if it's absolutely correct, but he did not have jurisdiction [01:22:04.900 --> 01:22:10.780] to render that ruling, the ruling is void. [01:22:10.780 --> 01:22:15.500] You said that almost exactly like what I've got here out of Texas jurisprudence. [01:22:15.500 --> 01:22:21.660] It says, any judicial action by a court without jurisdiction is void and should be regarded [01:22:21.660 --> 01:22:23.460] as if it never existed. [01:22:23.460 --> 01:22:30.660] Well, I only said it that way because I'm such a fart smeller and a deep stinker. [01:22:30.660 --> 01:22:33.860] No, I've been through this a long time. [01:22:33.860 --> 01:22:42.340] And that's an important distinction to understand, the difference between void and voidable. [01:22:42.340 --> 01:22:49.940] If a judge renders a ruling, even if it's absolutely correct, and he doesn't have jurisdiction [01:22:49.940 --> 01:22:54.740] to render that ruling, it is void on his face. [01:22:54.740 --> 01:23:04.580] If a judge has jurisdiction to rule in a case, but he rules improperly, then it's voidable. [01:23:04.580 --> 01:23:11.580] It is valid and law until it is rendered void by another court. [01:23:11.580 --> 01:23:16.780] Does that make sense? [01:23:16.780 --> 01:23:21.620] Jane, are you there? [01:23:21.620 --> 01:23:24.940] She's muted. [01:23:24.940 --> 01:23:29.580] Jane, you sound so much nicer when you're muted. [01:23:29.580 --> 01:23:35.820] Y'all muted me, okay, that's good, because I kept trying to interrupt. [01:23:35.820 --> 01:23:42.260] I told you already, Brett, I was gonna try to plagiarize your pleading, but there's a [01:23:42.260 --> 01:23:43.900] big difference. [01:23:43.900 --> 01:23:46.700] You argued yours all the way up to that point. [01:23:46.700 --> 01:23:50.260] You went through the trial court, you went up. [01:23:50.260 --> 01:23:54.860] Mine is skipping directly, not even going to the first hearing, and then just going [01:23:54.860 --> 01:23:56.180] to the appeals court. [01:23:56.180 --> 01:24:03.900] And you're saying this is still gonna work, because I haven't been in front of the judge. [01:24:03.900 --> 01:24:08.860] I don't even know who the judge and the prosecutors are. [01:24:08.860 --> 01:24:14.300] I'm not saying to you that you can use the same exact language that I used in an appeal [01:24:14.300 --> 01:24:19.780] if it didn't go to a trial court, because I'm referencing the fact that the trial court [01:24:19.780 --> 01:24:20.780] had no jurisdiction. [01:24:20.780 --> 01:24:26.580] So if you didn't go through that step, then yeah, don't say it in the same exact way. [01:24:26.580 --> 01:24:27.980] Okay, I won't. [01:24:27.980 --> 01:24:33.500] But what I'm saying is, so on my argument in my petition for a writ of mandamus to the [01:24:33.500 --> 01:24:38.260] appeals court, I'm only gonna argue the fact that they didn't give me my speedy trial, [01:24:38.260 --> 01:24:39.260] correct? [01:24:39.260 --> 01:24:44.060] Is that the only thing, or do I need to argue about the fact that they didn't dock it all [01:24:44.060 --> 01:24:46.340] on my pleadings that I filed? [01:24:46.340 --> 01:24:50.140] Or- Wait, hold on, you said you were arguing speedy [01:24:50.140 --> 01:24:51.140] trial? [01:24:51.140 --> 01:24:53.820] Well, that was the whole thing. [01:24:53.820 --> 01:24:55.620] They didn't give me my speedy trial. [01:24:55.620 --> 01:24:59.660] Okay, you have to understand. [01:24:59.660 --> 01:25:07.500] Speedy trial is a really big deal for specialists for Texas courts. [01:25:07.500 --> 01:25:16.820] They want to have all the time they want to be able to coerce you into making a deal. [01:25:16.820 --> 01:25:23.700] So when you start challenging them on speedy trial, it's not just your case, but it's every [01:25:23.700 --> 01:25:26.740] other case that potentially comes in front of them. [01:25:26.740 --> 01:25:33.780] Oh shit, well, they're not gonna- So ruling in your favor for them will be [01:25:33.780 --> 01:25:37.700] a really, really big deal. [01:25:37.700 --> 01:25:41.420] Well, then I can't go that far. [01:25:41.420 --> 01:25:47.180] You haven't contacted me for my brief on speedy trial? [01:25:47.180 --> 01:25:49.580] I haven't, I filed it. [01:25:49.580 --> 01:25:50.580] They haven't heard it. [01:25:50.580 --> 01:25:51.580] What? [01:25:51.580 --> 01:25:52.940] Yeah, I filed it. [01:25:52.940 --> 01:25:53.940] They haven't heard it. [01:25:53.940 --> 01:25:57.420] Oh, okay, then you should be in pretty good shape on that. [01:25:57.420 --> 01:26:05.380] Okay, but understand, in the real world, at the end of the day, it doesn't matter how [01:26:05.380 --> 01:26:11.140] good your law is, it's all political. [01:26:11.140 --> 01:26:17.620] As political on both sides, if you have a good argument, and my argument in the speedy [01:26:17.620 --> 01:26:23.620] trial, if you have the, I'm not sure which version you have, but primarily what I wanna [01:26:23.620 --> 01:26:33.980] argue is, is that while the state will claim that the Texas Speedy Trial Act has been overturned, [01:26:33.980 --> 01:26:39.900] the white, the constitutional right to a speedy trial has not been negated. [01:26:39.900 --> 01:26:48.140] And the state wants to act as though, since the act has been overturned, then they can [01:26:48.140 --> 01:26:51.460] take as long as they want to. [01:26:51.460 --> 01:26:54.140] And I'm saying, no, you can't. [01:26:54.140 --> 01:27:01.180] While the act itself has been overturned, it was overturned for reasons that have nothing [01:27:01.180 --> 01:27:04.500] to do with time limits. [01:27:04.500 --> 01:27:14.700] And in the preamble to 1043, House Bill 1043, that enacted the Speedy Trial Act, the legislature [01:27:14.700 --> 01:27:22.460] stated that they considered a delay of more than 30 days in a Class C misdemeanor to be [01:27:22.460 --> 01:27:25.460] untimely. [01:27:25.460 --> 01:27:33.900] 60 days in a Class B, 90 in a Class A, and 120 in a felony. [01:27:33.900 --> 01:27:42.340] So you're maintaining that the constitutional right to a speedy trial has not been overturned. [01:27:42.340 --> 01:27:51.460] And that the legislative intent, as it goes to what constitutes a speedy trial, has not [01:27:51.460 --> 01:27:53.460] been overturned. [01:27:53.460 --> 01:27:55.980] And that's 30, 60, 90, 120. [01:27:55.980 --> 01:28:02.140] So, are you telling me that that is my challenge to them, even though they denied my due process [01:28:02.140 --> 01:28:05.300] rights by not giving me notice of a trial? [01:28:05.300 --> 01:28:07.540] And I can only prove that by saying that- [01:28:07.540 --> 01:28:15.620] Okay, one thing you have to get down, and it's hard for people who are initially pro [01:28:15.620 --> 01:28:22.300] se is to separate issues. [01:28:22.300 --> 01:28:26.420] Your speedy trial is separate from what they noticed you for. [01:28:26.420 --> 01:28:31.620] If they fail to give you notice, that's a different issue. [01:28:31.620 --> 01:28:39.020] Okay, well, then which one am I needing to argue on the petition for a writ of mandamus [01:28:39.020 --> 01:28:40.380] to have this thing go away? [01:28:40.380 --> 01:28:45.860] And it's jurisdiction, I know, but I haven't proved the fact that they don't have jurisdiction [01:28:45.860 --> 01:28:46.860] yet. [01:28:46.860 --> 01:28:57.420] Well, if they fail to bring you to trial within what the legislature alleged was speedy, then [01:28:57.420 --> 01:29:02.900] the onus is on them to show due cause for the delay. [01:29:02.900 --> 01:29:11.540] So if you're charged with a Class C misdemeanor, they need to show due cause for why they delayed [01:29:11.540 --> 01:29:12.540] for over 30 days. [01:29:12.540 --> 01:29:13.540] And you know what? [01:29:13.540 --> 01:29:21.220] If they overturn this, you said it's gonna mess up, it's gonna really shake up things. [01:29:21.220 --> 01:29:24.820] And so do you think they're actually gonna dismiss it? [01:29:24.820 --> 01:29:25.820] You know what I'm saying? [01:29:25.820 --> 01:29:31.220] Okay, you got that part, good, you understand the politics. [01:29:31.220 --> 01:29:33.500] They're not gonna give you a ruling in your favor. [01:29:33.500 --> 01:29:40.580] So what you have to do is give them a secondary way out. [01:29:40.580 --> 01:29:46.300] You can't back a bulldog into a corner without giving them a way out, or he's gonna bite [01:29:46.300 --> 01:29:47.300] you. [01:29:47.300 --> 01:29:50.700] Hang on, we'll pick this up on the other side, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of [01:29:50.700 --> 01:30:03.380] War Radio, we'll be right back. [01:30:03.380 --> 01:30:08.900] Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps [01:30:08.900 --> 01:30:09.900] on growing. [01:30:09.900 --> 01:30:13.060] But now researchers say we can add stress to the list. [01:30:13.060 --> 01:30:17.140] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment. [01:30:17.140 --> 01:30:18.860] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:18.860 --> 01:30:22.460] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:22.460 --> 01:30:27.460] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:27.460 --> 01:30:32.700] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:32.700 --> 01:30:35.220] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:35.220 --> 01:30:40.860] This message is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, [01:30:40.860 --> 01:30:42.580] Yahoo and Bing. [01:30:42.580 --> 01:30:44.780] Start over with Startpage. [01:30:44.780 --> 01:30:49.100] Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects? [01:30:49.100 --> 01:30:52.780] If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart. [01:30:52.780 --> 01:30:56.300] But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain. [01:30:56.300 --> 01:31:01.240] A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, which actually [01:31:01.240 --> 01:31:04.800] makes it harder for people to manage problems. [01:31:04.800 --> 01:31:08.740] Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter [01:31:08.740 --> 01:31:11.060] in their prefrontal cortex. [01:31:11.060 --> 01:31:16.220] That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions. [01:31:16.220 --> 01:31:18.500] So take a deep breath and chill out. [01:31:18.500 --> 01:31:21.340] It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack. [01:31:21.340 --> 01:31:31.540] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:31.540 --> 01:31:36.900] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.900 --> 01:31:39.340] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:39.340 --> 01:31:43.980] 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.980 --> 01:31:46.820] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.820 --> 01:31:49.420] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:49.420 --> 01:31:50.860] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.860 --> 01:31:51.860] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.860 --> 01:31:53.260] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:53.260 --> 01:31:54.260] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:54.260 --> 01:31:55.940] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.940 --> 01:31:58.540] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.540 --> 01:32:03.220] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:03.220 --> 01:32:06.060] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [01:32:06.060 --> 01:32:09.820] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going [01:32:09.820 --> 01:32:13.780] to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:13.780 --> 01:32:16.980] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [01:32:16.980 --> 01:32:20.660] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:32:20.660 --> 01:32:24.860] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [01:32:24.860 --> 01:32:26.260] our rights through due process. [01:32:26.260 --> 01:32:30.220] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [01:32:30.220 --> 01:32:33.980] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [01:32:33.980 --> 01:32:36.220] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [01:32:36.220 --> 01:32:40.380] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [01:32:40.380 --> 01:32:41.700] ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.700 --> 01:32:45.060] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [01:32:45.060 --> 01:32:49.460] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [01:32:49.460 --> 01:32:51.780] documents and other useful resource material. [01:32:51.780 --> 01:32:55.740] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.740 --> 01:33:00.540] Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:00.540 --> 01:33:07.540] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:34:00.540 --> 01:34:25.740] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and Jane, I'm going to [01:34:25.740 --> 01:34:31.020] ask you to address this on the Telegram channel. [01:34:31.020 --> 01:34:36.340] We have a full board of callers, and we're going to have to put in an archive tomorrow [01:34:36.340 --> 01:34:43.340] night because our producer is going to be out of town and she can't maintain the system, [01:34:43.340 --> 01:34:47.620] so we're not going to do a show tomorrow night, and I've got three more people who've been [01:34:47.620 --> 01:34:50.860] on for an hour and a half. [01:34:50.860 --> 01:34:55.980] Jane, it would be all right with you if we do this on the Telegram. [01:34:55.980 --> 01:35:02.340] As long as you're going to help me on the Telegram, because I'm running out of time. [01:35:02.340 --> 01:35:03.900] We will help you on the Telegram. [01:35:03.900 --> 01:35:05.260] All right. [01:35:05.260 --> 01:35:06.260] Thank you. [01:35:06.260 --> 01:35:07.260] Okay. [01:35:07.260 --> 01:35:08.260] Thank you, Jane. [01:35:08.260 --> 01:35:09.260] All right. [01:35:09.260 --> 01:35:10.260] Okay. [01:35:10.260 --> 01:35:17.180] Now we're going to go to, okay, I've got Anne in New York, Ralph in Texas, and Timothy [01:35:17.180 --> 01:35:18.180] in Texas. [01:35:18.180 --> 01:35:22.460] I probably won't get to everybody, and I'm not going to do a show tomorrow night, and [01:35:22.460 --> 01:35:29.820] I apologize about that, but if you have something that's timely and critical, email me about [01:35:29.820 --> 01:35:37.900] it, randy at ruleoflawradio.com, and I'll address this off the air, if I don't get [01:35:37.900 --> 01:35:38.900] to you. [01:35:38.900 --> 01:35:39.900] Okay. [01:35:39.900 --> 01:35:41.460] We're going to Anne in New York. [01:35:41.460 --> 01:35:45.260] Okay, Anne, what do you have for us today? [01:35:45.260 --> 01:35:47.020] Okay. [01:35:47.020 --> 01:35:59.260] I have Adult Protector Service trying to do me in, it feels like, and I had the judge. [01:35:59.260 --> 01:36:06.740] We had four court hearings so far, and I was appointed- [01:36:06.740 --> 01:36:09.860] Okay, hold on, hold on. [01:36:09.860 --> 01:36:16.140] Give us a brief synopsis so we're orientated on what's going on here. [01:36:16.140 --> 01:36:22.020] Okay, my place was a mess, physically. [01:36:22.020 --> 01:36:32.620] I had too many things, hoarding, they call it, so the neighbors whose driveway I share [01:36:32.620 --> 01:36:34.700] reported me. [01:36:34.700 --> 01:36:37.940] Wait a minute. [01:36:37.940 --> 01:36:39.980] Tell us what this is about first, so- [01:36:39.980 --> 01:36:40.980] The service. [01:36:40.980 --> 01:36:45.220] No, she said it was hoarding, is what the neighbors were calling it. [01:36:45.220 --> 01:36:47.300] There was just too much stuff. [01:36:47.300 --> 01:36:48.780] Oh, okay. [01:36:48.780 --> 01:36:52.260] This, Anne, we had Anne and Scott on this. [01:36:52.260 --> 01:36:54.940] Okay, now I know who you are. [01:36:54.940 --> 01:37:01.060] Okay, did they come by and throw away your stuff? [01:37:01.060 --> 01:37:11.060] Okay, Anne was in an apartment, and the county was trying to protect her from herself. [01:37:11.060 --> 01:37:18.100] When we get old, everybody feels like we get stupid and ignorant and incompetent, and we [01:37:18.100 --> 01:37:20.140] need to be protected from ourselves. [01:37:20.140 --> 01:37:27.220] It's apparent of what they're doing to Anne, and they came in and decided she was hoarding. [01:37:27.220 --> 01:37:31.780] Did they clean out your apartment? [01:37:31.780 --> 01:37:38.740] I have an apartment and a house, and they had a heavy-duty cleaning for each of them, [01:37:38.740 --> 01:37:49.340] a few, and they took, on Scott's stuff, they took two motor scooters to work at working, [01:37:49.340 --> 01:37:53.660] two gas lawn mowers, a home vac- [01:37:53.660 --> 01:37:55.740] That's what they did before. [01:37:55.740 --> 01:37:57.740] Have they come back since then? [01:37:57.740 --> 01:38:06.620] Not to the driveway, they came from my house, and the particular people were very nice, [01:38:06.620 --> 01:38:12.980] but they started looking at my canned food, and a few of them were expired, so they threw [01:38:12.980 --> 01:38:15.860] out, I think, all the canned food. [01:38:15.860 --> 01:38:21.060] Scott had put together up-to-date canned food for the cat, lots of it. [01:38:21.060 --> 01:38:28.660] It was all sorted out, and they just threw it all out without looking, and I didn't [01:38:28.660 --> 01:38:31.500] think they would do it because they had seen so nice. [01:38:31.500 --> 01:38:34.980] They took my house plans and threw them out. [01:38:34.980 --> 01:38:42.100] I started yelling at them, and they brought back three out of the five, and I could deal [01:38:42.100 --> 01:38:46.620] with that somewhat because they were so nice, but then they told me there were only three [01:38:46.620 --> 01:38:53.500] to begin with, and being called a liar or incompetent or whatever they were doing was [01:38:53.500 --> 01:38:58.380] too much for me because I've had those plans for years, and they threw them out. [01:38:58.380 --> 01:39:00.740] Then I found out they threw out my wall clock. [01:39:00.740 --> 01:39:01.740] I don't know why. [01:39:01.740 --> 01:39:03.380] Those were little things. [01:39:03.380 --> 01:39:08.300] In the apartment, they threw out two musical keyboards. [01:39:08.300 --> 01:39:09.780] They threw them away. [01:39:09.780 --> 01:39:14.900] I don't understand that, unless they took them home or sold them. [01:39:14.900 --> 01:39:18.620] Nobody throws out musical keyboards than I know of. [01:39:18.620 --> 01:39:20.660] It seems insane. [01:39:20.660 --> 01:39:29.940] They threw away part of a Vitamix, the $200 part, but they threw out a small refrigerator, [01:39:29.940 --> 01:39:37.340] and the lawyer that I thought might have been okay at one point, he was there. [01:39:37.340 --> 01:39:42.540] I wasn't, and he didn't notice that what they were throwing out somehow. [01:39:42.540 --> 01:39:44.340] Who do I sue? [01:39:44.340 --> 01:39:50.340] Because I think somebody should be sued for all the, I mean... [01:39:50.340 --> 01:40:00.740] Well, the problem is, this is something you'll have to take on. [01:40:00.740 --> 01:40:02.100] I can't do it for you. [01:40:02.100 --> 01:40:03.900] Brett can't do it for you. [01:40:03.900 --> 01:40:04.900] No, no. [01:40:04.900 --> 01:40:12.500] Does the temporary legal guardian agency who hires these people get sued? [01:40:12.500 --> 01:40:20.660] I mean, they're a private agency, I guess, and I'm assuming they're a not-for-profit [01:40:20.660 --> 01:40:27.340] private agency that got hired by the judge to do a heavy duty cleaning. [01:40:27.340 --> 01:40:34.340] They hired a group, a different group each time, and supposedly they were told to take [01:40:34.340 --> 01:40:35.340] everything. [01:40:35.340 --> 01:40:42.100] Now, when I told the judge, I spoke at a turn one time, and I told the judge they had taken [01:40:42.100 --> 01:40:49.580] the gas lawnmower, she got upset that they took it, and she told the temporary guardian [01:40:49.580 --> 01:40:54.660] lawyer that was at the hearing that he should make good. [01:40:54.660 --> 01:41:00.060] She didn't say those words, but that's what she meant. [01:41:00.060 --> 01:41:01.060] Of course he hasn't. [01:41:01.060 --> 01:41:07.420] Meanwhile, I get tickets, I have to get another lawnmower or something, because cutting with [01:41:07.420 --> 01:41:10.260] a pair of scissors doesn't do it. [01:41:10.260 --> 01:41:15.740] You have to go through the curb, you have things growing, and you have to keep it short. [01:41:15.740 --> 01:41:19.460] Even though some people do have plants, not too many. [01:41:19.460 --> 01:41:26.980] A few people I went, I drive by, and I see they have pretty plants growing, and I don't [01:41:26.980 --> 01:41:29.140] think they get any tickets. [01:41:29.140 --> 01:41:33.020] Mine aren't pretty plants, but I like it. [01:41:33.020 --> 01:41:37.620] And nobody's walking there, they're saying, I'm obstructing the sidewalk. [01:41:37.620 --> 01:41:38.620] Nobody walks on the grass. [01:41:38.620 --> 01:41:42.020] Okay, but hold on there, okay. [01:41:42.020 --> 01:41:44.820] What do you want to do about this? [01:41:44.820 --> 01:41:48.660] I want to sue. [01:41:48.660 --> 01:41:54.660] And I want to get the rules changed, because I'm not the only one that they're doing this [01:41:54.660 --> 01:41:55.660] to. [01:41:55.660 --> 01:42:00.780] They don't tell you what it is they're looking for when they come to do a heavy duty cleaning. [01:42:00.780 --> 01:42:08.580] Are they looking to make it safer, so in case of a fire, you don't have as much stuff in [01:42:08.580 --> 01:42:15.860] there that will burn. [01:42:15.860 --> 01:42:23.140] They give you one day's notice, is all they're supposedly required to do. [01:42:23.140 --> 01:42:28.140] Under what specific authority do they do this, or do you know what that is? [01:42:28.140 --> 01:42:29.620] The judge ordered it. [01:42:29.620 --> 01:42:38.020] There's a judge who was elected, and he's ordering it, and he hasn't heard me talk [01:42:38.020 --> 01:42:39.020] yet. [01:42:39.020 --> 01:42:46.820] I'm supposedly incompetent, but that's what you know, interviewed me, and all these things [01:42:46.820 --> 01:42:47.820] that she got wrong. [01:42:47.820 --> 01:42:53.420] And the judge has this issue I have, needs to get fired. [01:42:53.420 --> 01:42:56.420] Do I need the judge to agree to fire him? [01:42:56.420 --> 01:43:00.620] When I fire him, I don't understand how it works. [01:43:00.620 --> 01:43:05.660] Okay, here's a problem that we have. [01:43:05.660 --> 01:43:16.660] There are two sides to this issue, and we're isolated from the issue, so we can't come [01:43:16.660 --> 01:43:24.900] up there and take action in your defense, and to your benefit. [01:43:24.900 --> 01:43:33.180] And you don't know enough about the law to be able to do it yourself. [01:43:33.180 --> 01:43:38.900] And I talked to Scott, and Scott seems to have some angry issues, and he definitely [01:43:38.900 --> 01:43:43.300] does not have the legal knowledge to be able to do this. [01:43:43.300 --> 01:43:45.700] I don't know how to help you. [01:43:45.700 --> 01:43:52.940] And it's frustrating, because you're talking about what happens when you get old, and I'm [01:43:52.940 --> 01:43:54.980] getting old. [01:43:54.980 --> 01:44:00.460] So hang on, Randy Kelton, we'll be right back. [01:44:00.460 --> 01:44:01.460] Dang cookies. [01:44:01.460 --> 01:44:02.460] Cookie? [01:44:02.460 --> 01:44:03.460] I love cookies. [01:44:03.460 --> 01:44:04.460] Oh, hi, Cookie Muncher. [01:44:04.460 --> 01:44:06.460] No, these are yucky cookies. [01:44:06.460 --> 01:44:07.460] Cookies? [01:44:07.460 --> 01:44:08.460] Yucky? [01:44:08.460 --> 01:44:09.460] No, no bad cookies. [01:44:09.460 --> 01:44:11.180] You can't even eat these cookies. [01:44:11.180 --> 01:44:12.180] These are cyber cookies. [01:44:12.180 --> 01:44:13.180] No, can't eat? [01:44:13.180 --> 01:44:16.820] No, they are cyber cookies, and they clog up your computer. [01:44:16.820 --> 01:44:17.820] These have apples. [01:44:17.820 --> 01:44:18.820] Really? [01:44:18.820 --> 01:44:20.820] Oh, that's an actual apple. [01:44:20.820 --> 01:44:22.820] Mmm, yummy apple. [01:44:22.820 --> 01:44:26.820] I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash. [01:44:26.820 --> 01:44:33.020] I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them. [01:44:33.020 --> 01:44:34.540] Bye bye, yucky cookies. [01:44:34.540 --> 01:44:40.220] Now I go to logosradionetwork.com, and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand [01:44:40.220 --> 01:44:46.260] side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy [01:44:46.260 --> 01:44:47.260] new cookies. [01:44:47.260 --> 01:44:48.260] New cookies? [01:44:48.260 --> 01:44:49.260] For me? [01:44:49.260 --> 01:44:51.060] Consider it an early Christmas present. [01:44:51.060 --> 01:44:55.860] And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this [01:44:55.860 --> 01:44:56.860] radio network, too. [01:44:56.860 --> 01:44:57.860] Fee is for cookie. [01:44:57.860 --> 01:44:58.860] Fee is for classified. [01:44:58.860 --> 01:45:04.340] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.340 --> 01:45:11.100] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course [01:45:11.100 --> 01:45:14.100] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:14.100 --> 01:45:19.300] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.300 --> 01:45:23.100] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.100 --> 01:45:27.940] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too. [01:45:27.940 --> 01:45:34.740] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.740 --> 01:45:39.620] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [01:45:39.620 --> 01:45:43.580] principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.580 --> 01:45:49.740] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:49.740 --> 01:45:56.420] pro se tactics, and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner [01:45:56.420 --> 01:46:26.180] or call toll-free 866-LAW-EASY. [01:46:27.260 --> 01:46:36.140] Some things I realize fully Somebody's on the police, I'm policemen [01:46:36.140 --> 01:46:44.340] Somebody's on the police, police There's always a room at the top of the hill [01:46:44.340 --> 01:46:47.940] Here through the grapevine And there's lonely left too [01:46:47.940 --> 01:46:52.820] They're wishing it was more Than our position to fill [01:46:52.820 --> 01:46:56.820] They know that if they don't do it, somebody will [01:46:56.820 --> 01:47:00.820] The things in this world we never understand [01:47:00.820 --> 01:47:04.820] Something I realize fully [01:47:04.820 --> 01:47:09.820] Somebody's gonna call the police, that's probably mine [01:47:09.820 --> 01:47:13.820] Somebody's gonna pull the police [01:47:13.820 --> 01:47:15.820] I know they will [01:47:15.820 --> 01:47:17.820] Yeah, they're gonna put the bill [01:47:17.820 --> 01:47:22.820] Because I see so much injustice there [01:47:22.820 --> 01:47:26.820] Never fail to tip back that scale [01:47:26.820 --> 01:47:30.820] Never fail to tip back that scale [01:47:30.820 --> 01:47:32.820] I know they will [01:47:34.820 --> 01:47:36.820] I know they will [01:47:36.820 --> 01:47:38.820] I said no! [01:47:38.820 --> 01:47:42.820] Expectation hours, huh? [01:47:42.820 --> 01:47:44.820] I know they will [01:47:44.820 --> 01:47:47.820] I said no! [01:47:47.820 --> 01:47:49.820] I know they will [01:47:49.820 --> 01:47:52.820] Went down to that old quarry the other day [01:47:52.820 --> 01:48:03.820] Okay, we are back. Miranda Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Life Radio. Brett and I were struggling over this issue. [01:48:03.820 --> 01:48:09.820] Not me, I'm not struggling. I'm pretty solid in my perspective on this. [01:48:09.820 --> 01:48:14.820] That's because Brett's still young and full of himself. [01:48:14.820 --> 01:48:17.820] I'm in my mid-70s. [01:48:17.820 --> 01:48:25.820] I would think it would be the other way around. If you were in your mid-70s, then you would be wanting to say what I'm saying, which is [01:48:25.820 --> 01:48:29.820] The government doesn't have any business budding in and saying [01:48:29.820 --> 01:48:33.820] Whether you have a right to hoard things or not [01:48:33.820 --> 01:48:38.820] Whether you have a right to be safe or unsafe in your home, it's your home. [01:48:38.820 --> 01:48:42.820] I think if you're in your mid-70s, you would guard that more carefully. [01:48:42.820 --> 01:48:45.820] I have more experience with older people. [01:48:45.820 --> 01:48:50.820] I took care of my mom for the last two and a half years of her life. [01:48:50.820 --> 01:48:56.820] And I straddled this line [01:48:56.820 --> 01:49:04.820] Of how much sense of independence can I give her [01:49:04.820 --> 01:49:08.820] Without placing her life in serious jeopardy. [01:49:08.820 --> 01:49:15.820] But see, that's great. What you were doing is where law can't go [01:49:15.820 --> 01:49:21.820] And impose itself on the people and say you must be safe in the ways that we tell you to be safe. [01:49:21.820 --> 01:49:28.820] Love can. You love your mama. You go in there and you lovingly tell her the truth and say, [01:49:28.820 --> 01:49:35.820] Look, this is a problem. I love you too much to let it stay this way. That's different. [01:49:35.820 --> 01:49:40.820] So how do you... Okay, we have Anne here. [01:49:40.820 --> 01:49:43.820] Anne, how old are you? [01:49:43.820 --> 01:49:46.820] I'm 85. [01:49:46.820 --> 01:49:53.820] So we have other people who aren't that old and they think of older people as being demented [01:49:53.820 --> 01:49:55.820] And diminished capacity. [01:49:55.820 --> 01:50:01.820] And you live in a place that's crowded where there are people all around you. [01:50:01.820 --> 01:50:07.820] If your house catches on fire and burns down, it may kill your next door neighbor. [01:50:07.820 --> 01:50:12.820] What duty do we have to our next door neighbor? [01:50:12.820 --> 01:50:20.820] And you've spoken of these people and apparently they're not mean, vicious, bad-minded people. [01:50:20.820 --> 01:50:26.820] We have everybody here trying to do what they think is right. [01:50:26.820 --> 01:50:39.820] And it's a question of where do our personal proclivities end and our duty to our neighbors begin. [01:50:39.820 --> 01:50:45.820] If you live out in the country where no one's around you, you can pretty much do what you want to. [01:50:45.820 --> 01:50:51.820] But if you're in a house that's right next to somebody else's house and your house catches on fire, [01:50:51.820 --> 01:50:56.820] it's likely to burn that guy's house down. Does he have anything to say about [01:50:56.820 --> 01:51:03.820] what you can do in your house that will create a hazard for him? [01:51:03.820 --> 01:51:06.820] This is hard. [01:51:06.820 --> 01:51:12.820] She has to not take everything. Maybe she never said take everything. [01:51:12.820 --> 01:51:16.820] I don't know because I'm getting his third hand. [01:51:16.820 --> 01:51:25.820] Do these people seem to be unfailing or ill-considerate? [01:51:25.820 --> 01:51:32.820] And I know Brett's over there cringing when I'm saying this because he's saying this is your property. [01:51:32.820 --> 01:51:36.820] This is something you paid for. [01:51:36.820 --> 01:51:45.820] It belongs to you. They have no right to interfere with your personal property. [01:51:45.820 --> 01:51:48.820] And this is your castle. This is your home. [01:51:48.820 --> 01:51:57.820] Who the heck are they to come into your home and tell you what you can have in your home? [01:51:57.820 --> 01:52:04.820] In case of fire, it is somewhat, it's real. I've had too much stuff. [01:52:04.820 --> 01:52:11.820] But the judge can't go around ordering heavy duty cleaning without knowing each time they do it. [01:52:11.820 --> 01:52:17.820] How many people? One time they sent seven or eleven people to do heavy duty cleaning. [01:52:17.820 --> 01:52:22.820] And that's insane. They need to do it as though you hired them. [01:52:22.820 --> 01:52:30.820] You hired two at a time so you could see what they're taking, what's important to you, not just eleven at once. [01:52:30.820 --> 01:52:39.820] Now the lawyer I had that I want to fire, do I need the judge to approve my firing him? I don't know. [01:52:39.820 --> 01:52:47.820] Well, firing him may not be the best route. Bar grieving him might get his attention. [01:52:47.820 --> 01:52:57.820] Yeah, but there's something wrong with him. I think he's having sleeper on medication or he's lackadaisical. He's out of it somehow. [01:52:57.820 --> 01:53:06.820] I'm really concerned here. And you have to know I'm on your side. [01:53:06.820 --> 01:53:11.820] You're 85. I'm 74. We're not that far apart. [01:53:11.820 --> 01:53:17.820] And where you're at, I'm closing in on that very quickly. [01:53:17.820 --> 01:53:27.820] And when I was in my 50s, I didn't consider this as a problem. But now that I'm in my 70s, I see end of life coming at me like a freight train. [01:53:27.820 --> 01:53:29.820] Me too. [01:53:29.820 --> 01:53:38.820] And my kids right now are stepping up to try to take care of me and I don't feel like I need them to take care of me. [01:53:38.820 --> 01:53:41.820] You don't need them to take care of you. [01:53:41.820 --> 01:54:01.820] And that's concerning because my ability to control my life, my children are likely to interfere with in the best of faith to try to help me to what they believe is help that I need. [01:54:01.820 --> 01:54:06.820] But I don't know that I need that or not. [01:54:06.820 --> 01:54:16.820] This is the situation you're in. It sounds like you haven't indicated these people were mean or vicious or tried to steal everything from you. [01:54:16.820 --> 01:54:22.820] These are people who are really trying to do the best thing for the best reason. [01:54:22.820 --> 01:54:26.820] It's just that we're coming to cost purposes. [01:54:26.820 --> 01:54:30.820] This is a really difficult issue. [01:54:30.820 --> 01:54:39.820] Well, it's difficult from a human perspective and it's simple from a law perspective. [01:54:39.820 --> 01:54:42.820] Yes, it is. [01:54:42.820 --> 01:54:43.820] From a law perspective. [01:54:43.820 --> 01:54:44.820] Is there ownership? [01:54:44.820 --> 01:54:45.820] Well, no, wait a minute. [01:54:45.820 --> 01:54:47.820] Who owns it? [01:54:47.820 --> 01:54:56.820] Well, what we don't know is what laws or rules or regulations they have in New York regarding this issue. [01:54:56.820 --> 01:55:03.820] Well, still, maybe they have some that are inappropriate and unconstitutional because people have a right to own property. [01:55:03.820 --> 01:55:04.820] That includes her land. [01:55:04.820 --> 01:55:06.820] That includes her two plants that got stolen. [01:55:06.820 --> 01:55:07.820] That's theft. [01:55:07.820 --> 01:55:16.820] I don't care if somebody thought it was a good idea to take them away because they really honestly believe that it's better for her to have three plants instead of five. [01:55:16.820 --> 01:55:17.820] It's irrelevant. [01:55:17.820 --> 01:55:18.820] It's not their plan. [01:55:18.820 --> 01:55:29.820] The question becomes who the heck are you to decide for me what's the best for me? [01:55:29.820 --> 01:55:36.820] Oh, you think because I'm old, I'm somehow demented and can't make those determinations for myself. [01:55:36.820 --> 01:55:43.820] Even then, that would only become relevant if there's an imminent danger. [01:55:43.820 --> 01:55:54.820] Not just some theoretical might happen, yeah, a fire might burn somebody's house down, but actually imminent, a real present danger. [01:55:54.820 --> 01:55:58.820] Anne, have you been declared incompetent? [01:55:58.820 --> 01:56:13.820] I'm a possibly declared incompetent, and I wanted to get up and speak and refute the things. [01:56:13.820 --> 01:56:16.820] When they asked me, I said, tomorrow's my birthday. [01:56:16.820 --> 01:56:17.820] Okay. [01:56:17.820 --> 01:56:23.820] Then they asked me what year it was after I'd been talking to that interviewer for a while. [01:56:23.820 --> 01:56:30.820] I made a mistake, and I let myself get insulted and outraged that she would ask me such a thing. [01:56:30.820 --> 01:56:36.820] I said, I don't know where I gave a different month because I was so angry. [01:56:36.820 --> 01:56:43.820] I wanted to get up and go through all the mistakes, all the misunderstandings that had happened during the interview. [01:56:43.820 --> 01:56:49.820] The lawyers forced us to go to court, and he still hadn't called me. [01:56:49.820 --> 01:56:52.820] I need to get up and speak. [01:56:52.820 --> 01:56:55.820] The only way I can get up and speak is to fire him. [01:56:55.820 --> 01:56:56.820] That's fine. [01:56:56.820 --> 01:57:01.820] He doesn't protect my stuff during the heavy duty cleaning, even though he's there. [01:57:01.820 --> 01:57:03.820] Okay, wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:57:03.820 --> 01:57:08.820] Were you declared incompetent? [01:57:08.820 --> 01:57:10.820] Possibly incompetent. [01:57:10.820 --> 01:57:13.820] That's what needs to be addressed. [01:57:13.820 --> 01:57:20.820] If you have been declared incompetent, that changes everything. [01:57:20.820 --> 01:57:23.820] But I haven't been. [01:57:23.820 --> 01:57:27.820] The judge hasn't ruled on it yet, even though we've had four hearings. [01:57:27.820 --> 01:57:30.820] Oh, is that what you mean by possibly? [01:57:30.820 --> 01:57:35.820] You mean it's maybe pending, but it hasn't happened yet? [01:57:35.820 --> 01:57:36.820] Yes. [01:57:36.820 --> 01:57:37.820] Right. [01:57:37.820 --> 01:57:38.820] Okay. [01:57:38.820 --> 01:57:39.820] Well, that's good. [01:57:39.820 --> 01:57:41.820] Nip it in the bud. [01:57:41.820 --> 01:57:42.820] That's dangerous. [01:57:42.820 --> 01:57:44.820] Nip it in the bud. [01:57:44.820 --> 01:57:53.820] Are you able to prepare documents in your own defense? [01:57:53.820 --> 01:57:59.820] Yeah, I did it, but I don't know how to get it read in court or posted in court [01:57:59.820 --> 01:58:06.820] because nobody's calling me to speak. [01:58:06.820 --> 01:58:09.820] This is something that you have to do yourself. [01:58:09.820 --> 01:58:10.820] You have to set this up. [01:58:10.820 --> 01:58:15.820] You have to go to the court and file a motion of pleading with the court, [01:58:15.820 --> 01:58:20.820] contact the clerk, have the clerk set the motion of pleading for hearing. [01:58:20.820 --> 01:58:23.820] We are out of time in this show. [01:58:23.820 --> 01:58:30.820] Call back tomorrow night and we'll talk about things you can do to get this process going. [01:58:30.820 --> 01:58:32.820] He means next Thursday. [01:58:32.820 --> 01:58:33.820] I'm sorry, next Thursday. [01:58:33.820 --> 01:58:35.820] We won't be here tomorrow night. [01:58:35.820 --> 01:58:37.820] We're going to put it in an archive. [01:58:37.820 --> 01:58:40.820] So call us back next Friday. [01:58:40.820 --> 01:58:42.820] We'll have more time. [01:58:42.820 --> 01:58:43.820] Thursday's only two hours. [01:58:43.820 --> 01:58:45.820] We have four hours on Friday. [01:58:45.820 --> 01:58:49.820] Thank you all for listening and good night. [01:58:49.820 --> 01:58:54.820] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible [01:58:54.820 --> 01:58:57.820] called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:57.820 --> 01:59:01.820] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain [01:59:01.820 --> 01:59:05.820] what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God [01:59:05.820 --> 01:59:07.820] and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:07.820 --> 01:59:10.820] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:10.820 --> 01:59:19.820] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:19.820 --> 01:59:25.820] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:25.820 --> 01:59:29.820] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:29.820 --> 01:59:31.820] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:31.820 --> 01:59:35.820] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:35.820 --> 01:59:40.820] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:40.820 --> 01:59:48.820] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:48.820 --> 02:00:01.820] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.