[00:00.000 --> 00:05.840]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.840 --> 00:09.520]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.520 --> 00:10.920]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.920 --> 00:14.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.920 --> 00:17.020]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:17.020 --> 00:18.600]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.600 --> 00:22.200]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.200 --> 00:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.080]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.080 --> 00:34.760]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.760 --> 00:39.040]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:39.040 --> 00:42.580]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.580 --> 00:44.920]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:44.920 --> 00:47.860]  Spar, it's what fighters do.
[00:47.860 --> 00:51.320]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.320 --> 00:54.560]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.560 --> 01:01.640]  Spar with an extra P, S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly,
[01:01.640 --> 01:03.000]  and R for religion.
[01:03.000 --> 01:07.080]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:07.080 --> 01:10.920]  assembly, and religion, but petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.920 --> 01:14.640]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.640 --> 01:18.160]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.160 --> 01:20.880]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.880 --> 01:22.800]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:22.800 --> 01:31.240]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.240 --> 01:34.920]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.920 --> 01:38.360]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.360 --> 01:39.840]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.840 --> 01:43.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.760 --> 01:46.880]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.880 --> 01:48.480]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.480 --> 01:52.080]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:52.080 --> 01:56.840]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.840 --> 02:01.880]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.880 --> 02:04.600]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.600 --> 02:08.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.880 --> 02:12.440]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.440 --> 02:14.560]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:14.560 --> 02:20.360]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.360 --> 02:22.440]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.440 --> 02:26.920]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:26.920 --> 02:30.800]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.800 --> 02:31.800]  Get it?
[02:31.800 --> 02:34.080]  Two arms, bear hug, bear arms?
[02:34.080 --> 02:37.680]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.680 --> 02:43.440]  when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary
[02:43.440 --> 02:47.560]  government, one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote in America,
[02:47.560 --> 02:50.600]  but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[02:50.600 --> 02:52.600]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:52.600 --> 03:22.240]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:23.240 --> 03:36.240]  Are you going to do, yeah?
[03:36.240 --> 03:38.240]  Bad boys, bad boys.
[03:38.240 --> 03:43.240]  What you gonna do?
[03:43.240 --> 03:46.240]  What you gonna do when they come for you?
[03:46.240 --> 03:47.240]  Bad boys, bad boys.
[03:47.240 --> 03:48.240]  What you gonna do?
[03:48.240 --> 03:49.240]  What you gonna do when they come for you?
[03:49.240 --> 03:52.240]  Bad boys x2 Whatcha gonna do
[03:52.240 --> 03:54.240]  Whatcha gonna do When they come for you?
[03:54.240 --> 03:57.240]  Bad boys x2 Whatcha gonna do
[03:58.240 --> 04:00.240]  Whatcha gonna do When they come for you
[04:00.240 --> 04:03.240]  You chuck it on that one You chuck it on this one
[04:03.240 --> 04:06.240]  You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father
[04:06.240 --> 04:08.240]  You chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister
[04:08.240 --> 04:11.240]  You chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me
[04:11.240 --> 04:14.240]  Bad boys x2 Whatcha gonna do
[04:14.240 --> 04:24.600]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelty from Brett Fountain, Blah Blah Radio on this, the 22nd
[04:24.600 --> 04:35.880]  day of June, 2023, on this Thursday, the 22nd of June, 2023.
[04:35.880 --> 04:41.640]  And almost got my major lawsuit filed.
[04:41.640 --> 04:46.760]  It wasn't so hard writing the 145-page lawsuit.
[04:46.760 --> 04:52.560]  The hard part is getting down all the annoying details you have to have in place before you
[04:52.560 --> 04:54.560]  can file it.
[04:54.560 --> 05:00.080]  That has really been a pain in the neck, but I'm closing in on it.
[05:00.080 --> 05:03.360]  When you say details, are you talking about details in the suit?
[05:03.360 --> 05:07.600]  Like not repeating something, are you talking about they want you to put in a certificate
[05:07.600 --> 05:12.280]  of how many are interested persons and all that?
[05:12.280 --> 05:17.760]  Yeah, all that annoying detail.
[05:17.760 --> 05:21.520]  And then the clerk figured out that you used Ariel and you're supposed to use Times New
[05:21.520 --> 05:22.520]  Roman?
[05:22.520 --> 05:24.480]  Yeah, and that kind of stuff.
[05:24.480 --> 05:31.200]  We got the first one filed without too much problem, but we did spend a lot of time getting
[05:31.200 --> 05:36.920]  all the details right.
[05:36.920 --> 05:44.400]  We spent all day back and forth trying to get all the little details in place.
[05:44.400 --> 05:47.280]  It's getting there.
[05:47.280 --> 06:00.280]  So I'm hoping tomorrow to have my $500 million lawsuit filed and get these judges having to
[06:00.280 --> 06:06.560]  read it, whether they want to or not.
[06:06.560 --> 06:18.400]  And I'm hoping that if nothing else works, the judges get exposed to the brief, to the
[06:18.400 --> 06:28.240]  details of how the code was very carefully crafted by our founders.
[06:28.240 --> 06:40.080]  And I tried to write it so that I didn't select anybody out as a bad guy, except us.
[06:40.080 --> 06:47.360]  I did tell them that I swore on my oath that I'd protect this country from all enemies,
[06:47.360 --> 06:49.760]  foreign and domestic.
[06:49.760 --> 06:52.360]  I found an enemy.
[06:52.360 --> 07:01.160]  It is domestic, but it's not you, and it's not the police, it's not prosecutors, it's
[07:01.160 --> 07:03.880]  not the judges.
[07:03.880 --> 07:04.880]  It's me.
[07:04.880 --> 07:16.440]  It's me and the rest of us citizens who were too busy with our own lives to do our jobs.
[07:16.440 --> 07:21.400]  When one of our public officials steps half inch across one of our legal lines, it was
[07:21.400 --> 07:26.440]  our duty to stand up and rail in a righteous indignation.
[07:26.440 --> 07:35.040]  But we were too busy paying attention to how much I got to pay my car payment or my house
[07:35.040 --> 07:36.040]  payment.
[07:36.040 --> 07:40.480]  Oh my goodness, some people take it way beyond that.
[07:40.480 --> 07:46.960]  They're busy looking at American Idol and Who's Got Talent, and they're watching all
[07:46.960 --> 07:53.760]  these stupid cat videos and fails of people doing stupid stuff, and all of their time
[07:53.760 --> 07:58.920]  goes to things that are completely brain dead.
[07:58.920 --> 08:01.400]  I was trying to be generous.
[08:01.400 --> 08:05.320]  Okay, they were busy paying their house bill.
[08:05.320 --> 08:15.520]  I was thinking the same thing, but I was trying to be generous and not pick on anybody.
[08:15.520 --> 08:25.640]  I wanted to project this as something that happened that nobody caught it, a minor adjustment
[08:25.640 --> 08:34.400]  that seemed just fine at the time, but over a period of time it morphed into a serious
[08:34.400 --> 08:37.400]  problem.
[08:37.400 --> 08:39.600]  So I'm not blaming anybody.
[08:39.600 --> 08:45.600]  Okay, well I'm blaming the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
[08:45.600 --> 08:48.080]  I'm saying it's your fault, if anything.
[08:48.080 --> 08:55.400]  You were the ones who were supposed to tell the Office of Court Administration how to
[08:55.400 --> 09:01.480]  do it, and you told them how to do it wrong.
[09:01.480 --> 09:09.240]  The whole point of the suit is to say the buck stops with you.
[09:09.240 --> 09:15.560]  Whether this is your fault or not, whether you created this mess or not, it's your job
[09:15.560 --> 09:18.680]  to fix it.
[09:18.680 --> 09:27.480]  And I tried to craft the suit in a way that it made sense that the court was true as the
[09:27.480 --> 09:34.760]  body of law has been over the last couple hundred years for Texas law and 800 years
[09:34.760 --> 09:46.080]  for English law, has been stitched together in a very well-constructed mosaic.
[09:46.080 --> 09:49.120]  But it's like a mosaic tile.
[09:49.120 --> 09:57.480]  You see in these old Roman baths and stuff they have these mosaic murals.
[09:57.480 --> 10:05.080]  Pull one tile out of that mural and the whole thing looks like crap.
[10:05.080 --> 10:14.160]  This mosaic of law, you pull one piece out of it and it tends to destabilize the whole
[10:14.160 --> 10:15.160]  thing.
[10:15.160 --> 10:21.560]  And in this case, they pulled a tiny little piece out that nobody really realized at the
[10:21.560 --> 10:25.040]  time how important it was.
[10:25.040 --> 10:27.760]  It was one of those foundational pieces.
[10:27.760 --> 10:30.880]  It didn't look like much.
[10:30.880 --> 10:32.560]  Take the person directly to the nearest magistrate.
[10:32.560 --> 10:35.560]  Heck, it won't hurt anything if you take them to jail and take them to the magistrate in
[10:35.560 --> 10:36.560]  the morning.
[10:36.560 --> 10:43.480]  And then have the magistrate, well, it's kind of a pain in the neck the next morning to
[10:43.480 --> 10:49.760]  get that officer who arrested him last night to come back in this morning for an examining
[10:49.760 --> 10:50.760]  trial.
[10:50.760 --> 10:55.720]  We'll just do this little arraignment thing instead.
[10:55.720 --> 11:01.640]  And then, well, if the guy can't get bailed out of jail, we don't want to prosecute him
[11:01.640 --> 11:04.840]  and sentence him to six months in jail.
[11:04.840 --> 11:11.040]  So we'll let him sit in jail for a year waiting for him to get him to make a deal.
[11:11.040 --> 11:16.600]  But if I do that, then I don't have to prosecute all these cases.
[11:16.600 --> 11:20.320]  I can just leave him in jail until they make a deal.
[11:20.320 --> 11:24.880]  Don't remind the fact that the judge has to sit on the bench every month and have this
[11:24.880 --> 11:30.600]  parade of people coming through his court to talk to the prosecutor so the prosecutor
[11:30.600 --> 11:35.720]  can twist their arm and try to force them into a deal.
[11:35.720 --> 11:41.440]  It's not better for the prosecutor, I mean, for the judge, it's better for the prosecutor
[11:41.440 --> 11:47.200]  because he doesn't have to prepare all these cases and present them to the court and have
[11:47.200 --> 11:49.080]  all these hearings.
[11:49.080 --> 11:51.520]  He can just send somebody down in there to twist their arms.
[11:51.520 --> 11:57.600]  I was just at a hearing yesterday and this really smart-she-mouth lawyer came in there
[11:57.600 --> 12:07.760]  and Robert Davis, the guy I'm helping, took him on and wiped the floor with him.
[12:07.760 --> 12:13.000]  He went in there and he tried to play huff and puff and frightened Robert into taking
[12:13.000 --> 12:17.080]  a deal and Robert wasn't having any part of that.
[12:17.080 --> 12:25.080]  He brought up a couple of laws and Robert crammed them down his throat and the guy is
[12:25.080 --> 12:30.400]  sitting there and his leg is bouncing up and down 90 miles an hour under the table so I
[12:30.400 --> 12:33.520]  guess Robert, the judge, couldn't see it.
[12:33.520 --> 12:38.720]  But I'm looking at that and said, boy, this boy's getting tense, and from his voice he
[12:38.720 --> 12:39.720]  was.
[12:39.720 --> 12:49.600]  He raised, the only issue he raised was that 1601 said you had a right to an examining
[12:49.600 --> 12:58.680]  trial before indictment in a felony and he implied that that meant you didn't have a
[12:58.680 --> 13:07.000]  right at all to an examining trial in a misdemeanor and Robert was all over that.
[13:07.000 --> 13:10.720]  No, that's not what he means.
[13:10.720 --> 13:19.940]  It only goes to when someone has a right to an examining trial in a felony, not whether
[13:19.940 --> 13:21.800]  anybody has a right to an examining trial.
[13:21.800 --> 13:27.600]  Well, he didn't get that done and then Robert pulled something into jail that I thought
[13:27.600 --> 13:30.880]  was pretty slick.
[13:30.880 --> 13:37.000]  He asked them for pencil and paper so he could write a request for an examining trial and
[13:37.000 --> 13:41.880]  they refused to give him paper and pencil.
[13:41.880 --> 13:46.440]  And then when he got before the magistrate, he requested an examining trial and the magistrate
[13:46.440 --> 13:48.920]  told him, well, you might get one.
[13:48.920 --> 13:52.280]  No, that's not how it works.
[13:52.280 --> 13:54.160]  I requested one right now.
[13:54.160 --> 13:56.960]  I'm standing in the front of a magistrate.
[13:56.960 --> 14:04.360]  The magistrate is to do that right now and the lawyer said, well, did you request an
[14:04.360 --> 14:08.880]  examining trial from the presiding judge?
[14:08.880 --> 14:12.240]  And he said, no, I didn't need to.
[14:12.240 --> 14:21.960]  I was before a magistrate and that magistrate at the time had jurisdiction.
[14:21.960 --> 14:30.160]  And the judge, the point about writing a no pencil to write a request, he asked him that
[14:30.160 --> 14:36.080]  a second time during the trial, he asked him to repeat it into the record.
[14:36.080 --> 14:40.160]  I think we have a judge who has read the pleading.
[14:40.160 --> 14:45.680]  Now this prosecutor who came in, he obviously had not read the pleading.
[14:45.680 --> 14:49.520]  It seems like they never do.
[14:49.520 --> 14:54.400]  They come in there not expecting to have to read anything.
[14:54.400 --> 14:55.400]  Exactly.
[14:55.400 --> 15:03.040]  He expects to just him get a little huffy puffy and terrify the litigant.
[15:03.040 --> 15:10.680]  Well, Robert had a couple of friends of his there and he did terrify the friends of his
[15:10.680 --> 15:18.200]  and he did terrify Robert, but Robert didn't let him know that.
[15:18.200 --> 15:24.800]  Robert stood right on top of him and put a couple of things in the record that the prosecutor
[15:24.800 --> 15:31.320]  objected to and the judge overruled him, some case law and such.
[15:31.320 --> 15:40.240]  He objected to case law and the judge said, I'll take it anyway, just ignored him.
[15:40.240 --> 15:48.560]  I think he was trying to, he found out I wrote the pleading and was trying to file criminal
[15:48.560 --> 15:53.360]  charges with the bailiff against me for illegal practice of law.
[15:53.360 --> 15:57.360]  So I'm gonna go down there Monday to see if there's a warrant.
[15:57.360 --> 16:00.600]  He asked another boy, did you hear that, that he wrote this pleading?
[16:00.600 --> 16:06.120]  And that said to the guy, he's gonna try to charge me with illegal practice of law.
[16:06.120 --> 16:08.960]  Good luck with that, Bubba.
[16:08.960 --> 16:13.440]  And I think he tried to do that and I'm betting the bailiff told him, you better leave that
[16:13.440 --> 16:14.440]  guy alone.
[16:14.440 --> 16:22.280]  I'm pretty sure if he talked to the judge, the judge told him, you better leave him alone.
[16:22.280 --> 16:29.640]  Because it was the judge that I quoted the illegal practice of law statute to.
[16:29.640 --> 16:33.640]  I had it memorized and this was 20 years ago.
[16:33.640 --> 16:40.720]  I said, it is a crime to hold yourself out as a lawyer and represent a person in court
[16:40.720 --> 16:45.600]  in a personal injury or property damage suit.
[16:45.600 --> 16:48.600]  And he was a prosecutor at the time, he said, you sure?
[16:48.600 --> 16:52.640]  Yeah, that's what it says, and he gets out the code and looks it up, Greg, you ought
[16:52.640 --> 16:57.840]  to be ashamed of yourself, have a good look at that up, hang on, Randy Kelton, Rep Fountain,
[16:57.840 --> 17:27.800]  New Law Radio, we'll be right back.
[17:58.840 --> 18:06.040]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of his
[18:06.040 --> 18:07.040]  word?
[18:07.040 --> 18:12.160]  Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for scripture
[18:12.160 --> 18:18.560]  talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2, 15.
[18:18.560 --> 18:23.080]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly
[18:23.080 --> 18:25.480]  dividing the word of truth.
[18:25.480 --> 18:29.080]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go
[18:29.080 --> 18:32.760]  verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[18:32.760 --> 18:37.400]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[18:37.400 --> 18:39.760]  and Christian character development.
[18:39.760 --> 18:44.280]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[18:44.280 --> 18:48.600]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[18:48.600 --> 18:50.880]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[18:50.880 --> 18:57.520]  So tune in to scripture talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[18:57.520 --> 19:27.000]  motivate your studies of the scriptures.
[19:57.520 --> 20:27.440]  Well, this is the Rule of Law Radio.
[20:27.440 --> 20:28.440]  Randy Kelton.
[20:28.440 --> 20:29.440]  I'm Brett Fountain.
[20:29.440 --> 20:32.560]  I think Randy might be muted.
[20:32.560 --> 20:35.960]  And this is the 22nd of June, 2023.
[20:35.960 --> 20:38.880]  Oh my.
[20:38.880 --> 20:39.880]  There you are.
[20:39.880 --> 20:40.880]  I'm here.
[20:40.880 --> 20:41.880]  I don't know what that was.
[20:41.880 --> 20:44.640]  That my system may just be lagging.
[20:44.640 --> 20:48.240]  I've got some pretty crappy internet out here.
[20:48.240 --> 20:51.160]  Okay, go ahead, Brett.
[20:51.160 --> 20:52.160]  You were doing a great job.
[20:52.160 --> 20:56.720]  I don't know if you want to wrap up any of that or if you want to continue.
[20:56.720 --> 20:58.640]  We've got a first time caller here.
[20:58.640 --> 21:01.000]  Well, let's go ahead with our first time caller.
[21:01.000 --> 21:07.760]  I was just, oh, I did wrap it up and say the moral of this story is, is you can't fight
[21:07.760 --> 21:08.760]  these guys.
[21:08.760 --> 21:09.760]  You just got to know the rules.
[21:09.760 --> 21:10.760]  Yeah.
[21:10.760 --> 21:12.760]  So there's my wrap up.
[21:12.760 --> 21:14.320]  All right.
[21:14.320 --> 21:17.480]  So our first time caller tonight is Mark from Florida.
[21:17.480 --> 21:18.480]  Good evening, Mark.
[21:18.480 --> 21:19.480]  What's on your mind?
[21:19.480 --> 21:20.480]  Hi.
[21:20.480 --> 21:21.480]  How are you doing?
[21:21.480 --> 21:24.360]  First of all, I want to thank you guys.
[21:24.360 --> 21:29.440]  You've already helped me more than you know through the telegram sites and just I've learned
[21:29.440 --> 21:31.200]  so much from you already.
[21:31.200 --> 21:33.600]  I'm very thankful for that.
[21:33.600 --> 21:41.680]  So I used to live with my family in Manhattan, in the heart of darkness, and I had a great
[21:41.680 --> 21:42.680]  job.
[21:42.680 --> 21:44.280]  I wouldn't take the jab.
[21:44.280 --> 21:45.280]  I wouldn't do the test.
[21:45.280 --> 21:46.280]  I wouldn't wear the mask.
[21:46.280 --> 21:47.280]  I wouldn't do any of that.
[21:47.280 --> 21:51.860]  But on unpaid leave, then after a year I was fired.
[21:51.860 --> 21:58.640]  In the meantime, I sent them lots of, you know, my employer's lots and lots of notices
[21:58.640 --> 21:59.640]  of different kinds.
[21:59.640 --> 22:08.600]  And I tried to, you know, cross every T and dot every I and to have lots and lots of actual
[22:08.600 --> 22:10.400]  emails and things like that.
[22:10.400 --> 22:16.080]  I asked them lots and lots of questions that they wouldn't answer, all that good stuff.
[22:16.080 --> 22:17.080]  So that was done.
[22:17.080 --> 22:26.840]  So then that I was fired in July, August of 2022.
[22:26.840 --> 22:34.200]  Then I went through the grievance procedure, knowing that it wouldn't go anywhere really.
[22:34.200 --> 22:42.440]  But that went on for a while, didn't get anywhere, found out in the course of that, that my union
[22:42.440 --> 22:52.360]  representative, it was a union job, he agreed to my employer's policy of mass jabs, all
[22:52.360 --> 22:59.920]  that stuff, that was put in place after my CBA, my collective bargaining agreement, was
[22:59.920 --> 23:05.920]  settled, was finalized, and was ratified by the union.
[23:05.920 --> 23:10.360]  I found out that, I found out later on, so quite a bit later on, like over a year later
[23:10.360 --> 23:12.840]  on, that he had agreed to that.
[23:12.840 --> 23:16.440]  I never knew that because he never told us, he never told anybody.
[23:16.440 --> 23:22.440]  So he just quietly, unilaterally added terms to your contract.
[23:22.440 --> 23:23.440]  Exactly.
[23:23.440 --> 23:31.000]  Yeah, so not that long ago, about a month ago, three weeks ago, I filed, finally got
[23:31.000 --> 23:36.680]  my case together, filed my complaint with Four Causes of Action in New York State Supreme
[23:36.680 --> 23:44.840]  Court, and put my affidavit a mile and a half of exhibits in there.
[23:44.840 --> 23:55.280]  And not completely surprisingly, they, the union, I also, the case, the defendants named
[23:55.280 --> 24:06.640]  in the case were three employees of my company that I worked for, and this one representative
[24:06.640 --> 24:08.800]  of the union.
[24:08.800 --> 24:12.560]  I didn't name the union in the complaint.
[24:12.560 --> 24:19.920]  I didn't name my company that I worked for in the complaint because I decided to go after
[24:19.920 --> 24:22.560]  the men and women instead of the corporation.
[24:22.560 --> 24:34.280]  So about two or three days ago, I received notice from the attorney for the union rep
[24:34.280 --> 24:39.720]  that they have removed the case to federal district court.
[24:39.720 --> 24:44.360]  I had already been looking at case law for that, from that district court, thinking they
[24:44.360 --> 24:51.320]  might try to do that, but I'm still, I wouldn't say I'm blindsided, but I got good at looking
[24:51.320 --> 24:53.800]  up laws in New York City, in New York State.
[24:53.800 --> 24:57.840]  I got okay trying to figure out those laws, like where to look and how to interpret them,
[24:57.840 --> 25:02.720]  how to look at them, how to find them, but now have been just thrown headlong into federal
[25:02.720 --> 25:03.800]  law.
[25:03.800 --> 25:09.280]  And while I know the processes are basically the same, I feel a little at sea here.
[25:09.280 --> 25:17.560]  Like even my, the most basic question, like how long do I have to file a notice of appearance?
[25:17.560 --> 25:22.720]  I can't find, even in the federal rules of civil procedure, I can't find the answer.
[25:22.720 --> 25:23.720]  I've got the force.
[25:23.720 --> 25:26.720]  Wait, say that again, a notice of appearance?
[25:26.720 --> 25:34.320]  Well, like I don't want to, I want to make sure I don't miss any basic timelines, like
[25:34.320 --> 25:42.440]  the, they, they had a judge issue an order yesterday, the day after they notified me
[25:42.440 --> 25:49.400]  of the removal that, you know, my attorney, my attorney should, you know, file a notice
[25:49.400 --> 25:54.960]  of appearance, like I'm pro se and maybe the judge didn't get the memo.
[25:54.960 --> 26:01.800]  It says it on my Supreme court documents from the state, but, and so I've got like all these
[26:01.800 --> 26:08.240]  questions, like I feel like I should pursue a remand.
[26:08.240 --> 26:12.480]  I mean, I have a case from that court that's similar.
[26:12.480 --> 26:13.480]  Okay.
[26:13.480 --> 26:14.480]  Okay.
[26:14.480 --> 26:15.480]  I have a question.
[26:15.480 --> 26:16.480]  Yes.
[26:16.480 --> 26:20.000]  What was the reason for removal?
[26:20.000 --> 26:22.840]  Was it a diversity jurisdiction?
[26:22.840 --> 26:26.640]  I don't think so because you filed in New York against New York actors.
[26:26.640 --> 26:30.800]  So they would have to have a federal question.
[26:30.800 --> 26:37.960]  It is, it's, it's a section 301 under the federal labor management, what do they call
[26:37.960 --> 26:45.920]  the FLMA, I think the federal, they're, they're alleging that federal labor law supersedes
[26:45.920 --> 26:48.040]  my state complaint.
[26:48.040 --> 26:49.040]  And they
[26:49.040 --> 26:51.280]  But was that part of your complaint?
[26:51.280 --> 26:55.520]  Did somehow your complaint touch that or they're just trying to switch to call it something
[26:55.520 --> 26:58.320]  different that's federal?
[26:58.320 --> 27:06.200]  They're, my view on it is that they're taking my pleading, my allegations, and they're trying
[27:06.200 --> 27:16.960]  to contort them into a claim or into me alleging that they violated the CBA.
[27:16.960 --> 27:22.000]  I did not make any allegation that they violated the CBA because I don't have any problems
[27:22.000 --> 27:24.320]  with the CBA.
[27:24.320 --> 27:25.320]  So they're saying that
[27:25.320 --> 27:26.320]  Okay.
[27:26.320 --> 27:31.040]  I hate acronyms, CBA.
[27:31.040 --> 27:32.040]  Collective bargaining agreement.
[27:32.040 --> 27:33.040]  Okay.
[27:33.040 --> 27:38.920]  So they're saying it falls under federal labor law because of, just because, because there's
[27:38.920 --> 27:45.920]  a collective bargaining agreement and they're saying that I'm alleging that they violated
[27:45.920 --> 27:48.640]  the collective bargaining agreement.
[27:48.640 --> 27:54.960]  I never outright said that in my complaint because I was very careful not to do that.
[27:54.960 --> 27:59.880]  Also, I don't have a problem with that agreement, so.
[27:59.880 --> 28:04.520]  So they're arguing something that's outside the pleadings.
[28:04.520 --> 28:09.760]  So let me understand collective bargaining agreement.
[28:09.760 --> 28:10.760]  What does that mean?
[28:10.760 --> 28:13.560]  Is that where you said union?
[28:13.560 --> 28:22.920]  It's a union, yeah, it's a document that the union negotiates on behalf of the union
[28:22.920 --> 28:34.840]  represented employees that codifies all the rules that the employer and the union are
[28:34.840 --> 28:35.840]  going to follow.
[28:35.840 --> 28:40.560]  So for instance, there were a million work rules in there, right?
[28:40.560 --> 28:50.800]  And so the defendants are trying to frame this policy of these mandatory shots and masks
[28:50.800 --> 28:57.920]  and all that as a safety related work rule, if you can believe it.
[28:57.920 --> 29:01.960]  And that because they're calling it a work rule, it's governed by the CBA, but it's not
[29:01.960 --> 29:07.160]  in the, it's not in the collective bargaining agreement because they agreed to policy afterwards.
[29:07.160 --> 29:11.080]  So it's completely extra contractual.
[29:11.080 --> 29:19.200]  Yeah, and they're bringing in an argument that's outside the pleadings.
[29:19.200 --> 29:22.200]  They're arguing something that you didn't raise.
[29:22.200 --> 29:25.720]  Like if they want to defend something, that's fine.
[29:25.720 --> 29:26.720]  That's great.
[29:26.720 --> 29:31.440]  But their answer can't speak to something that you didn't complain about.
[29:31.440 --> 29:32.440]  Right.
[29:32.440 --> 29:38.880]  Right, that's a great way of putting it.
[29:38.880 --> 29:46.680]  I can see where they would say that this becomes part of the agreement with the union and the
[29:46.680 --> 29:49.680]  company.
[29:49.680 --> 29:52.920]  And that would be nice to argue, it'd be a good argument to have and it'll cost them
[29:52.920 --> 29:53.920]  a lot of money.
[29:53.920 --> 30:02.080]  So, on Randy, the Carol Brown Radio, we'll be right back.
[30:02.080 --> 30:06.200]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[30:06.200 --> 30:10.960]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your
[30:10.960 --> 30:11.960]  secrets.
[30:11.960 --> 30:16.120]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details.
[30:16.120 --> 30:17.720]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.720 --> 30:21.320]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.320 --> 30:26.080]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:26.080 --> 30:31.120]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.120 --> 30:33.840]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.840 --> 30:38.120]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[30:38.120 --> 30:41.660]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.660 --> 30:45.320]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:45.320 --> 30:50.080]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle
[30:50.080 --> 30:51.920]  your personal information.
[30:51.920 --> 30:54.560]  But what happens if it escapes their control?
[30:54.560 --> 30:55.920]  It's not an idle question.
[30:55.920 --> 31:01.360]  According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was
[31:01.360 --> 31:04.160]  breached by hackers in the last year.
[31:04.160 --> 31:07.360]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to Startpage.com.
[31:07.360 --> 31:12.280]  Unlike other search engines, Startpage doesn't store any data on you.
[31:12.280 --> 31:15.680]  They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals
[31:15.680 --> 31:16.680]  to see.
[31:16.680 --> 31:18.200]  The cupboard would be bare.
[31:18.200 --> 31:21.240]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[31:21.240 --> 31:23.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:23.280 --> 31:53.000]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:53.000 --> 31:58.360]  Getting justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son, go to BuildingWhat.org.
[31:58.360 --> 32:01.680]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.680 --> 32:05.520]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:05.520 --> 32:09.280]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[32:09.280 --> 32:12.840]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.840 --> 32:16.440]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.440 --> 32:20.480]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.480 --> 32:24.760]  The courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[32:24.760 --> 32:25.760]  through due process.
[32:25.760 --> 32:29.720]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.720 --> 32:33.480]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.480 --> 32:35.880]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.880 --> 32:39.880]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.880 --> 32:41.200]  ordering your copy today.
[32:41.200 --> 32:44.400]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.400 --> 32:48.960]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.960 --> 32:51.240]  documents and other useful resource material.
[32:51.240 --> 32:55.200]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.200 --> 33:00.960]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.960 --> 33:06.560]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:06.560 --> 33:20.080]  Yeah, Mr. Officer, you're taking the line to hand.
[33:20.080 --> 33:34.080]  Won't you follow the law of the land?
[33:34.080 --> 34:01.040]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Bret Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Mark
[34:01.040 --> 34:07.560]  in Florida, and here's what we kind of fingered out over the break.
[34:07.560 --> 34:15.760]  It appears as though the union rep arbitrarily and capriciously added a covenant to the collective
[34:15.760 --> 34:24.080]  bargaining agreement, and it appears to be an unconscionable covenant as it placed a
[34:24.080 --> 34:33.800]  restriction upon you and created duties for you, but gave you nothing in return.
[34:33.800 --> 34:43.160]  Does the union rep have the authority to change the collective bargaining agreement without
[34:43.160 --> 34:47.640]  putting the change up for a vote before the rank and file?
[34:47.640 --> 34:48.760]  I don't believe so.
[34:48.760 --> 34:53.840]  I can't find that permission anywhere.
[34:53.840 --> 34:58.480]  That's going to be a key piece to figure out because that's basically what they did.
[34:58.480 --> 35:11.880]  If you have signed something that gave them the authority to renegotiate as needed while
[35:11.880 --> 35:18.080]  you're still working without you being involved in that negotiation process, or like you said,
[35:18.080 --> 35:27.920]  they didn't even notify you that it had happened, but it depends, that's going to be a key point.
[35:27.920 --> 35:32.600]  Did you sign off for that?
[35:32.600 --> 35:38.920]  Has the union been able to change your working conditions in the past without a vote by the
[35:38.920 --> 35:41.480]  rank and file?
[35:41.480 --> 35:50.360]  Not that I ever remember, and we had meetings about ridiculous minutiae, so I can't imagine.
[35:50.360 --> 35:55.680]  I think that would have come up during the grievance process, but I think they would
[35:55.680 --> 36:00.200]  have just brought that up right away.
[36:00.200 --> 36:09.400]  But their angle that they're using is that it's a health-related safety rule.
[36:09.400 --> 36:15.800]  Like a lot of labor situations, union situations, there are some dangers involved in the job.
[36:15.800 --> 36:23.760]  So we would have negotiations during a contract with management about safety issues that would
[36:23.760 --> 36:24.760]  come up.
[36:24.760 --> 36:25.760]  Okay.
[36:25.760 --> 36:31.400]  Did they indicate where in the contract that authority appeared?
[36:31.400 --> 36:32.400]  Nope.
[36:32.400 --> 36:36.000]  And I looked at that thing six ways from Wednesday.
[36:36.000 --> 36:38.320]  I can't find it anywhere in that agreement.
[36:38.320 --> 36:46.560]  Then your argument is, for the federal court, is that there is nothing in the collective
[36:46.560 --> 36:53.200]  bargaining agreement that you agreed to covering this issue.
[36:53.200 --> 37:00.360]  And there's nothing authorizing this union rep to change the collective bargaining agreement.
[37:00.360 --> 37:08.760]  No, I would say that you can keep it simpler than that, when you're speaking to the feds,
[37:08.760 --> 37:12.160]  you can say, there's nothing in my pleadings.
[37:12.160 --> 37:14.360]  I brought this issue.
[37:14.360 --> 37:18.120]  In the four corners of my pleadings, there's nothing that brings a federal question, and
[37:18.120 --> 37:20.080]  there's nothing that brings diversity.
[37:20.080 --> 37:27.500]  So this court can't hear it, and let them argue about, oh, yes, there is.
[37:27.500 --> 37:30.920]  This has something to do with CBA, no, no, no.
[37:30.920 --> 37:32.400]  There's nothing in my pleadings.
[37:32.400 --> 37:36.680]  Yeah, you're the defendants, and you wanna talk about CBA, but I don't.
[37:36.680 --> 37:38.600]  I'm fine with the CBA.
[37:38.600 --> 37:41.880]  Look at my pleadings to find jurisdiction.
[37:41.880 --> 37:57.680]  Well, if you're accusing the union of an act that would have the effect of violating
[37:57.680 --> 38:00.040]  the CBA, the CBA gets engaged.
[38:00.040 --> 38:01.520]  But I'm saying-
[38:01.520 --> 38:04.080]  Right, he's saying he didn't try to do that.
[38:04.080 --> 38:05.320]  He stayed away from that.
[38:05.320 --> 38:07.960]  He didn't accuse the union of anything.
[38:07.960 --> 38:13.200]  Doesn't matter what he tried to do, it matters what the claim was.
[38:13.200 --> 38:22.040]  If the collective bargaining agreement has a provision for arbitrary changes based on
[38:22.040 --> 38:26.120]  health-related issues, something like a-
[38:26.120 --> 38:27.120]  Right, that's key.
[38:27.120 --> 38:28.120]  Yeah.
[38:28.120 --> 38:30.320]  No, it doesn't have that.
[38:30.320 --> 38:41.480]  So my causes of action, just to make it clear, the union representative as an individual
[38:41.480 --> 38:49.160]  was named as a defendant for breach of fair duty of representation.
[38:49.160 --> 38:52.240]  So good, that's perfect.
[38:52.240 --> 38:56.560]  Well, that necessarily involves opening up the collective bargaining agreement.
[38:56.560 --> 38:57.560]  But-
[38:57.560 --> 38:58.560]  No, it doesn't.
[38:58.560 --> 39:08.880]  You're accusing the union rep of acting ultra-viris beyond the scope of his contract.
[39:08.880 --> 39:12.440]  That does not implicate the contract.
[39:12.440 --> 39:14.600]  That implicates the actor.
[39:14.600 --> 39:22.640]  Just like when the police arrest me and throw the cuffs on me, they accuse me of violating
[39:22.640 --> 39:32.440]  my contract with the state.
[39:32.440 --> 39:37.920]  This doesn't implicate the state, it implicates the individual.
[39:37.920 --> 39:43.720]  This individual violated the collective bargaining agreement by adding unconscionable covenants
[39:43.720 --> 39:48.740]  to it without authority.
[39:48.740 --> 39:51.360]  So the union's not implicated.
[39:51.360 --> 39:54.440]  We didn't do this.
[39:54.440 --> 39:56.440]  This person did this.
[39:56.440 --> 39:57.440]  Okay.
[39:57.440 --> 39:58.440]  Okay.
[39:58.440 --> 39:59.440]  Right.
[39:59.440 --> 40:01.120]  That's great.
[40:01.120 --> 40:07.560]  I have a couple of other specific questions.
[40:07.560 --> 40:17.240]  So this, so I would seek a remand back to Supreme Court, I think, but I just found out
[40:17.240 --> 40:25.880]  today that the attorney for the union representative is planning to file a motion to dismiss the
[40:25.880 --> 40:26.880]  federal court.
[40:26.880 --> 40:29.040]  Of course he is.
[40:29.040 --> 40:30.040]  That's standard procedure.
[40:30.040 --> 40:35.960]  He's gonna file a 12B6, motion to dismiss, favor state claim, which could have been had.
[40:35.960 --> 40:37.440]  That is standard procedure.
[40:37.440 --> 40:38.440]  Yeah.
[40:38.440 --> 40:39.440]  Okay.
[40:39.440 --> 40:40.440]  Now I just-
[40:40.440 --> 40:41.720]  They do have like knee jerk.
[40:41.720 --> 40:52.960]  I helped a woman file a case in Arizona, in the state, and the bank immediately removed
[40:52.960 --> 40:56.600]  it to the Fed, and that was okay, cuz we kinda wanted them to do that.
[40:56.600 --> 41:00.520]  I told her they would do that, and they did.
[41:00.520 --> 41:10.860]  And we got a notice from the court, and the court said that the litigants had to have
[41:10.860 --> 41:21.720]  a conference to determine if any claims that could be made under 12B6 could be corrected
[41:21.720 --> 41:25.240]  by an amended pleading.
[41:25.240 --> 41:32.420]  They had to have this conference before they could file a 12B6.
[41:32.420 --> 41:36.600]  It seems as though the courts are getting tired of 12B6.
[41:36.600 --> 41:42.200]  They get a 12B6 on every case.
[41:42.200 --> 41:46.000]  Every time they can, they move it to the Fed, and the first thing they do is a 12B6.
[41:46.000 --> 41:56.240]  The 12B6 stops them from having to file an answer within 21 days.
[41:56.240 --> 42:00.020]  That stops everything.
[42:00.020 --> 42:06.320]  Even if the judge rules against a 12B6, then they can file an interlocutory appeal, and
[42:06.320 --> 42:10.800]  they can stop it for a year or two.
[42:10.800 --> 42:15.200]  It looks like the courts are getting a bit tired of that.
[42:15.200 --> 42:21.540]  So see if you get something from the courts ordering them to confer with you.
[42:21.540 --> 42:26.800]  So what they have to do, at least in Arizona, is they have to tell you what their complaint
[42:26.800 --> 42:30.000]  is before they do the 12B6.
[42:30.000 --> 42:35.840]  I'm not sure how that affects the 21 days.
[42:35.840 --> 42:38.520]  They have to file an answer.
[42:38.520 --> 42:46.560]  Right, because otherwise they would still have to file an answer to my complaint in
[42:46.560 --> 42:49.840]  a timely way, I would imagine.
[42:49.840 --> 42:57.120]  I think they would have to file a motion for extension of time.
[42:57.120 --> 42:59.560]  I haven't been on top of this one.
[42:59.560 --> 43:06.880]  I think they have done that, but they only give them a couple of weeks.
[43:06.880 --> 43:11.760]  I think they can request up to 45 days.
[43:11.760 --> 43:13.760]  Okay.
[43:13.760 --> 43:15.760]  Okay.
[43:15.760 --> 43:21.120]  They might not get it, but that's the max they can request, as far as I remember.
[43:21.120 --> 43:30.920]  But what happens is they have first, if it's unopposed, so if they do the meet and confer
[43:30.920 --> 43:34.560]  and you're like, you know what, it's fine, take all the time you need.
[43:34.560 --> 43:41.560]  Then they can put it in as an unopposed application for extension of time and the clerk can grant
[43:41.560 --> 43:42.560]  it.
[43:42.560 --> 43:47.880]  But if you're like, no, no, no, come on, you guys, you got a whole law firm, you can handle
[43:47.880 --> 43:48.880]  it.
[43:48.880 --> 43:55.520]  If you're extra timely and you oppose their extension, then they have to do a motion and
[43:55.520 --> 44:00.320]  the court has to figure out whether they get to have extra time or not.
[44:00.320 --> 44:01.440]  I love Logos.
[44:01.440 --> 44:04.640]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[44:04.640 --> 44:07.480]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[44:07.480 --> 44:08.480]  I need my truth fixed.
[44:08.480 --> 44:13.760]  I'd be lost without Logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air and love
[44:13.760 --> 44:17.400]  to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any
[44:17.400 --> 44:20.160]  money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[44:20.160 --> 44:21.840]  How can I help Logos?
[44:21.840 --> 44:24.080]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[44:24.080 --> 44:26.880]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos.
[44:26.880 --> 44:29.600]  You can order your supplies or holiday gifts.
[44:29.600 --> 44:31.520]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[44:31.520 --> 44:37.920]  Now go to logosregionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:37.920 --> 44:43.560]  Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[44:43.560 --> 44:44.560]  Do I pay extra?
[44:44.560 --> 44:45.560]  No.
[44:45.560 --> 44:47.080]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[44:47.080 --> 44:48.080]  No.
[44:48.080 --> 44:49.080]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[44:49.080 --> 44:50.080]  No.
[44:50.080 --> 44:51.080]  I mean, yes.
[44:51.080 --> 44:52.080]  Wow.
[44:52.080 --> 44:54.440]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[44:54.440 --> 44:56.000]  This is perfect.
[44:56.000 --> 44:57.000]  Thank you so much.
[44:57.000 --> 44:58.000]  You're welcome.
[44:58.000 --> 44:59.000]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[44:59.000 --> 45:04.600]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.600 --> 45:11.400]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[45:11.400 --> 45:15.200]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.200 --> 45:19.120]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.120 --> 45:23.400]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.400 --> 45:29.120]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[45:29.120 --> 45:35.040]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:35.040 --> 45:39.560]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[45:39.560 --> 45:43.880]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.880 --> 45:50.040]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:50.040 --> 45:52.840]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.840 --> 46:21.000]  Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:21.000 --> 46:25.960]  If you could not wait, it ain't about too long, would your process be done?
[46:25.960 --> 46:32.920]  Such a symptom and a soldier, a warrior of love, scaffolding to keep the peace, all they're
[46:32.920 --> 46:37.960]  taking is a misunderstanding, and somebody calls the police.
[46:37.960 --> 46:55.880]  Watching the sparks fly, watching the sparks fly, watching the sparks fly, watching the
[46:55.880 --> 47:02.280]  sparks fly.
[47:02.280 --> 47:07.400]  The friction is an addiction, the hard words can leave you cold as nails.
[47:07.400 --> 47:13.720]  There's been a possibility to try and quit it, a heavy load of taping on scales.
[47:13.720 --> 47:17.720]  The time is colliding with the conflict, you find out.
[47:17.720 --> 47:18.720]  Okay.
[47:18.720 --> 47:19.720]  We are back.
[47:19.720 --> 47:23.320]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and Brett, you were talking when we
[47:23.320 --> 47:24.920]  almost ran off the cliff.
[47:24.920 --> 47:33.280]  Yeah, I was just saying about how they, if the opposing side wants an extension of time,
[47:33.280 --> 47:41.840]  they can apply for that if they meet and confer and they figure out that it's unopposed, then
[47:41.840 --> 47:48.160]  they can tell the clerk, hey, this is unopposed and the clerk can grant the time.
[47:48.160 --> 47:53.600]  But if it's opposed, then they have to file a motion and the motion has to be heard by
[47:53.600 --> 47:57.640]  the court, not by the clerk.
[47:57.640 --> 48:04.160]  They have to show good cause for why they need extra time and so forth.
[48:04.160 --> 48:12.400]  So related to that, they also got an email from the opposing attorney today where according
[48:12.400 --> 48:22.520]  to the judge's rule, any party filing a motion to dismiss must request a pre-motion conference
[48:22.520 --> 48:29.280]  and the I must consent or oppose it or take no position.
[48:29.280 --> 48:40.460]  And I understand that they're filing a motion to dismiss, that's standard, but is there
[48:40.460 --> 48:46.400]  any benefit to opposing the pre-motion conference?
[48:46.400 --> 48:51.040]  No, hosing the conference, huh?
[48:51.040 --> 48:56.960]  I can't think of any downside to that.
[48:56.960 --> 49:04.600]  Go ahead, Randy.
[49:04.600 --> 49:11.880]  I'm wondering if they've written that into the rules or is it just an order the judge
[49:11.880 --> 49:13.360]  has decided to issue?
[49:13.360 --> 49:16.320]  No, I don't think it was an order.
[49:16.320 --> 49:23.000]  It's just one of the judge's rules of chamber is that if you're going to file a motion to
[49:23.000 --> 49:26.040]  dismiss, there has to be a pre-...
[49:26.040 --> 49:36.280]  I'm going to say this is in your favor because it stops them from filing a 12B6, which they,
[49:36.280 --> 49:41.440]  if you get ruled against, they can appeal and they can run the clock and get all the
[49:41.440 --> 49:46.640]  time they want to file a, they're hoping they'll never have to file an answer.
[49:46.640 --> 49:52.160]  They're certainly hoping they never get to discovery.
[49:52.160 --> 50:01.640]  So if you go ahead and let them have that conference, then you may eliminate their ability
[50:01.640 --> 50:04.160]  to file a 12B6.
[50:04.160 --> 50:06.760]  Okay, okay.
[50:06.760 --> 50:14.120]  Besides, they'll tell you ahead of time what they're going to, what issues they have and
[50:14.120 --> 50:18.680]  what they don't bring to this conference, they can't put in their 12B6 when they file
[50:18.680 --> 50:20.160]  it.
[50:20.160 --> 50:25.160]  Okay, okay, okay.
[50:25.160 --> 50:28.680]  All right.
[50:28.680 --> 50:40.280]  Another question I have is, so they removed, in removing my case to federal court, they're
[50:40.280 --> 50:44.600]  only addressing three out of my four causes of action.
[50:44.600 --> 50:49.640]  I also had an employer retaliation against employee cause of action that they didn't
[50:49.640 --> 50:50.640]  even understand.
[50:50.640 --> 50:59.840]  If they didn't address it, then they waived their complaint, they waived their objection
[50:59.840 --> 51:00.840]  to it.
[51:00.840 --> 51:01.840]  Yeah.
[51:01.840 --> 51:02.840]  Now they can't argue it.
[51:02.840 --> 51:06.000]  So that piece is ripe for summary judgment.
[51:06.000 --> 51:07.000]  Yeah.
[51:07.000 --> 51:08.000]  Don't bring it up.
[51:08.000 --> 51:12.200]  At least don't bring it up because they're negotiating filing a 12B6.
[51:12.200 --> 51:14.720]  That means they haven't filed an answer yet.
[51:14.720 --> 51:15.720]  Okay.
[51:15.720 --> 51:16.720]  Yeah.
[51:16.720 --> 51:20.400]  So don't bring it up until they file their answer.
[51:20.400 --> 51:25.080]  If it's not in their answer, then you can move for summary judgment.
[51:25.080 --> 51:26.080]  Okay.
[51:26.080 --> 51:27.080]  All right.
[51:27.080 --> 51:28.080]  All right.
[51:28.080 --> 51:29.080]  Excellent.
[51:29.080 --> 51:30.080]  Okay.
[51:30.080 --> 51:42.480]  I also, I was writing, while I was waiting for their answer in state court, I was seriously
[51:42.480 --> 51:50.240]  writing up, they're called notices to admit in New York, but they're all normally called
[51:50.240 --> 51:58.240]  requests for admissions and to have, you know, I have a bunch of, a bunch of them.
[51:58.240 --> 52:04.600]  Do I need, like, I'm a little confused at when it's not, you know, when do I get this,
[52:04.600 --> 52:13.800]  of course I'm going to take these documents and transfer them into federal request for
[52:13.800 --> 52:14.800]  admissions.
[52:14.800 --> 52:20.760]  But when I can, can I go ahead and mail them to the defendant?
[52:20.760 --> 52:21.760]  Yes.
[52:21.760 --> 52:22.760]  I sure would.
[52:22.760 --> 52:23.760]  Yeah.
[52:23.760 --> 52:24.760]  Yeah.
[52:24.760 --> 52:27.000]  Discovery would start any time.
[52:27.000 --> 52:34.000]  If you wait until after they, somehow, if they down the road get this motion to dismiss
[52:34.000 --> 52:42.880]  into the hopper, well, then it would be improper to do discovery in some cases.
[52:42.880 --> 52:47.160]  So they might have a stay of discovery.
[52:47.160 --> 52:52.640]  So then they get to sit there and chew on how they want to try to be evasive to your
[52:52.640 --> 52:54.960]  admissions.
[52:54.960 --> 52:57.580]  And the clock is not even ticking.
[52:57.580 --> 53:02.600]  And they may never even have to answer it because the motion to dismiss is a reason
[53:02.600 --> 53:06.680]  to, for them to ask for a stay.
[53:06.680 --> 53:13.240]  So if you get it in there first, then the clock is already ticking on their admissions.
[53:13.240 --> 53:14.240]  Okay.
[53:14.240 --> 53:15.240]  Okay.
[53:15.240 --> 53:24.240]  So that kind of brings me back to my first question.
[53:24.240 --> 53:32.440]  Because they've removed it to federal court, but I initiated the case, like, how do I,
[53:32.440 --> 53:33.440]  how do I make an appearance?
[53:33.440 --> 53:38.080]  How do I tell the court that I'm involved?
[53:38.080 --> 53:39.080]  Do I file an...
[53:39.080 --> 53:44.640]  You filed the, you filed the original petition.
[53:44.640 --> 53:47.080]  That's how you told them that you were involved.
[53:47.080 --> 53:48.080]  Okay.
[53:48.080 --> 53:49.080]  Okay.
[53:49.080 --> 53:52.320]  So I don't have to actually file...
[53:52.320 --> 53:53.320]  No disappearance.
[53:53.320 --> 53:54.320]  No.
[53:54.320 --> 53:55.320]  Okay.
[53:55.320 --> 53:56.320]  Okay.
[53:56.320 --> 53:57.320]  Thank you.
[53:57.320 --> 54:01.440]  It's like a basic question, but I couldn't really...
[54:01.440 --> 54:06.360]  The hardest thing to find is what's not in there.
[54:06.360 --> 54:09.520]  Your original petition is your notice.
[54:09.520 --> 54:10.520]  Okay.
[54:10.520 --> 54:11.520]  Okay.
[54:11.520 --> 54:20.000]  The only ones that a defendant doesn't have to file a notice, lawyers have to file notice.
[54:20.000 --> 54:22.000]  Got it.
[54:22.000 --> 54:23.000]  Okay.
[54:23.000 --> 54:28.920]  They also said I, you know, I got an email saying, oh, there's a possibility that you
[54:28.920 --> 54:34.560]  can use the magistrate judge instead of the judge that's been assigned.
[54:34.560 --> 54:39.520]  If you want, magistrate judge doesn't do criminal cases, so they have more time, blah, blah,
[54:39.520 --> 54:40.520]  blah.
[54:40.520 --> 54:44.160]  Is there any benefit to using a magistrate judge?
[54:44.160 --> 54:48.200]  Not that I know of.
[54:48.200 --> 54:55.320]  Magistrate judges, they make a mess of everything and they're not, they don't have any responsibility
[54:55.320 --> 54:57.480]  like the judge does.
[54:57.480 --> 54:59.700]  Okay.
[54:59.700 --> 55:03.920]  The judges are too busy, so they get these magistrate judges to do the work for them
[55:03.920 --> 55:09.600]  and they pretty well rubber-stamp what the magistrate does, but the magistrate doesn't
[55:09.600 --> 55:13.840]  have the responsibility that the judge does.
[55:13.840 --> 55:21.680]  So they tend to hire these chumps, these wannabe judges or these lawyers who can't make it
[55:21.680 --> 55:28.160]  as lawyers, so they come down and get hired with the federal court to act as a magistrate
[55:28.160 --> 55:29.160]  judge.
[55:29.160 --> 55:35.560]  I have not found them to be of the highest caliber.
[55:35.560 --> 55:36.880]  Okay.
[55:36.880 --> 55:38.120]  Okay.
[55:38.120 --> 55:46.120]  It's kind of like prosecutors in the municipal court.
[55:46.120 --> 55:50.080]  If they were, they're not the sharpest knife in the drawer, because if they were, they'd
[55:50.080 --> 55:57.080]  be out making the big bucks and not down here in the municipalities grubbing for dollars.
[55:57.080 --> 56:04.720]  I call them not the sharpest bowling ball on the rack.
[56:04.720 --> 56:09.760]  That's a confusing metaphor.
[56:09.760 --> 56:16.080]  My uncle used to say, boy, he's about as sharp as a bowling ball.
[56:16.080 --> 56:18.080]  Okay.
[56:18.080 --> 56:27.960]  The only other thing I can't wrap my brain around is that I looked up the federal rule
[56:27.960 --> 56:40.400]  for removal and for challenging removal, and it states that I have 30 days to file a motion
[56:40.400 --> 56:48.680]  to remand pursuant to the code, except for matters of subject jurisdiction.
[56:48.680 --> 56:52.600]  And of course, this is all about subject jurisdiction.
[56:52.600 --> 56:59.600]  And then I can't find what—so again, it's like if it's not there, where do I find what's
[56:59.600 --> 57:00.600]  not there?
[57:00.600 --> 57:03.080]  I don't know when I can file a motion to remand.
[57:03.080 --> 57:06.480]  Well, think of it this way.
[57:06.480 --> 57:10.840]  The way that I'm hearing what you just now said makes perfect sense in light of the fact
[57:10.840 --> 57:15.120]  that subject matter jurisdiction can't just be waived.
[57:15.120 --> 57:19.000]  They either have it or they don't, so they can't put a time limit on that.
[57:19.000 --> 57:25.040]  But they can say, if there's something other than subject matter jurisdiction, then let's
[57:25.040 --> 57:26.040]  set a limit.
[57:26.040 --> 57:31.120]  Let's set it to 30 days, and that's reasonable, and anybody that wants to address some other
[57:31.120 --> 57:39.480]  aspect of jurisdiction, you know, if it's something about personal jurisdiction, hey,
[57:39.480 --> 57:46.120]  I didn't get the service, well, did you get actual notice, did it get mailed?
[57:46.120 --> 57:48.120]  So somebody could address those kinds of things.
[57:48.120 --> 57:52.680]  But the subject matter jurisdiction, it makes perfect sense that there's no time limit
[57:52.680 --> 57:59.040]  set on that, because if the court never got jurisdiction, then talking about it or not
[57:59.040 --> 58:02.760]  talking about it, the court can't just have it.
[58:02.760 --> 58:07.080]  That's in the case law, that subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged, no matter
[58:07.080 --> 58:09.720]  how remote in history.
[58:09.720 --> 58:14.920]  Because if they don't have subject matter jurisdiction at the beginning, it never ever
[58:14.920 --> 58:15.920]  accrues.
[58:15.920 --> 58:16.920]  Okay.
[58:16.920 --> 58:17.920]  Okay.
[58:17.920 --> 58:18.920]  Okay.
[58:18.920 --> 58:19.920]  Is that it?
[58:19.920 --> 58:20.920]  I think that's it.
[58:20.920 --> 58:32.040]  So I guess that goes within what I saw about this similar case in the same court that was
[58:32.040 --> 58:39.480]  successfully remanded, and it looks like their attorneys filed the remand at 31 days, and
[58:39.480 --> 58:41.040]  it was based on subject matter jurisdiction.
[58:41.040 --> 58:43.840]  So they just waited for the 30 days.
[58:43.840 --> 58:47.280]  And that's what yours is, you say there's no federal question.
[58:47.280 --> 58:50.400]  Hang on, we'll be right back.
[58:50.400 --> 58:55.840]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.840 --> 58:58.640]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.640 --> 59:04.040]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.040 --> 59:07.280]  the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:07.280 --> 59:09.040]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.040 --> 59:14.980]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.980 --> 59:18.720]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.720 --> 59:23.880]  Deep and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into
[59:23.880 --> 59:28.400]  the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.400 --> 59:33.560]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.560 --> 59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.080]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.080 --> 01:00:02.520]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.520 --> 01:00:06.200]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:06.200 --> 01:00:09.640]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:09.640 --> 01:00:11.080]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:11.080 --> 01:00:15.020]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:00:15.020 --> 01:00:17.880]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:17.880 --> 01:00:19.480]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:19.480 --> 01:00:23.080]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:23.080 --> 01:00:27.640]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:00:27.640 --> 01:00:33.040]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:33.040 --> 01:00:35.600]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.600 --> 01:00:39.880]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:00:39.880 --> 01:00:43.440]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:43.440 --> 01:00:46.880]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:46.880 --> 01:00:50.840]  When your mom and dad are getting ready for bed, they pull back the covers and find a
[01:00:50.840 --> 01:00:52.320]  third party there.
[01:00:52.320 --> 01:00:55.520]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:55.520 --> 01:00:59.640]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment
[01:00:59.640 --> 01:01:01.240]  was designed to prevent.
[01:01:01.240 --> 01:01:05.440]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in
[01:01:05.440 --> 01:01:07.560]  the days of our founding fathers.
[01:01:07.560 --> 01:01:09.880]  Third party, Third Amendment, get it?
[01:01:09.880 --> 01:01:13.720]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them
[01:01:13.720 --> 01:01:17.360]  to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[01:01:17.360 --> 01:01:19.080]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:19.080 --> 01:01:32.280]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:32.280 --> 01:01:35.920]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.920 --> 01:01:39.400]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:39.400 --> 01:01:40.880]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.880 --> 01:01:44.800]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:01:44.800 --> 01:01:47.760]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:47.760 --> 01:01:49.360]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.360 --> 01:01:52.960]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.960 --> 01:01:57.760]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.760 --> 01:01:59.200]  So protect your rights.
[01:01:59.200 --> 01:02:02.960]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.960 --> 01:02:05.520]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.520 --> 01:02:09.800]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:02:09.800 --> 01:02:13.360]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:13.360 --> 01:02:17.040]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:17.040 --> 01:02:22.400]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass, or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:22.400 --> 01:02:26.880]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable
[01:02:26.880 --> 01:02:28.360]  search and seizure.
[01:02:28.360 --> 01:02:30.720]  Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you?
[01:02:30.720 --> 01:02:31.720]  Get it?
[01:02:31.720 --> 01:02:34.840]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of
[01:02:34.840 --> 01:02:35.840]  security.
[01:02:35.840 --> 01:02:40.360]  That's in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:40.360 --> 01:02:44.400]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say
[01:02:44.400 --> 01:02:47.200]  it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:47.200 --> 01:02:51.480]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly
[01:02:51.480 --> 01:02:53.760]  eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:53.760 --> 01:02:55.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:02:55.560 --> 01:03:20.360]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:20.360 --> 01:03:47.560]  Okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Wheel of Law Radio on this Thursday, the 22nd
[01:03:47.560 --> 01:03:50.680]  day, the 23rd day, where did my clock go?
[01:03:50.680 --> 01:03:51.680]  Twenty-second.
[01:03:51.680 --> 01:03:54.720]  Twenty-second, my computer's slowing down.
[01:03:54.720 --> 01:03:58.760]  I can't get the mouse to respond.
[01:03:58.760 --> 01:03:59.760]  Twenty-second day of June.
[01:03:59.760 --> 01:04:02.760]  Something's slowing down.
[01:04:02.760 --> 01:04:03.760]  2022.
[01:04:03.760 --> 01:04:15.600]  Okay, three, the 22nd day of June, 23rd is the 23rd day to go, well, figure it out.
[01:04:15.600 --> 01:04:23.200]  I was talking to Mark in Florida, Mark, you had one more issue.
[01:04:23.200 --> 01:04:29.520]  I didn't really, it was just about the remand schedule, like when can I file that motion
[01:04:29.520 --> 01:04:30.520]  to remand?
[01:04:30.520 --> 01:04:36.720]  But because it's about subject matter jurisdiction, I have to wait till a 30 days expire, right?
[01:04:36.720 --> 01:04:38.720]  And then I can file it.
[01:04:38.720 --> 01:04:48.080]  No, you don't have to wait at all on subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:04:48.080 --> 01:04:58.040]  Subject matter jurisdiction may be challenged at any time.
[01:04:58.040 --> 01:05:03.240]  I thought the rules said I had 30 days to notice the motion to remand except for subject
[01:05:03.240 --> 01:05:04.240]  matter jurisdiction.
[01:05:04.240 --> 01:05:11.440]  You have to do it within 30 days.
[01:05:11.440 --> 01:05:14.040]  You are on the wrong side of the limitation.
[01:05:14.040 --> 01:05:15.040]  Okay.
[01:05:15.040 --> 01:05:16.040]  Okay.
[01:05:16.040 --> 01:05:17.040]  Okay.
[01:05:17.040 --> 01:05:18.040]  All right.
[01:05:18.040 --> 01:05:19.040]  Okay.
[01:05:19.040 --> 01:05:20.040]  That was it.
[01:05:20.040 --> 01:05:21.040]  I'm glad I waited.
[01:05:21.040 --> 01:05:22.040]  Okay.
[01:05:22.040 --> 01:05:23.040]  Okay.
[01:05:23.040 --> 01:05:36.440]  Brett, you're going to have to do the board, my mouse is frozen up.
[01:05:36.440 --> 01:05:37.440]  That's fine.
[01:05:37.440 --> 01:05:38.440]  All right.
[01:05:38.440 --> 01:05:39.440]  Thanks, Mark.
[01:05:39.440 --> 01:05:41.840]  And next up we have Tina in California.
[01:05:41.840 --> 01:05:43.880]  Tina, thanks for being patient.
[01:05:43.880 --> 01:05:47.000]  It's all you've been on there since the beginning.
[01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:48.960]  Thanks for letting us take our first time caller.
[01:05:48.960 --> 01:05:49.960]  What's on your mind?
[01:05:49.960 --> 01:05:56.800]  Well, it's always interesting to learn from everybody, first time callers included, so
[01:05:56.800 --> 01:05:58.360]  I appreciate listening.
[01:05:58.360 --> 01:06:04.320]  I just wanted to give you guys an update of what's been happening with my request for
[01:06:04.320 --> 01:06:11.400]  an extension of time to file my reply brief in my appeal.
[01:06:11.400 --> 01:06:20.280]  On May the 5th, if you recall, I had filed a motion and request for judicial notice for
[01:06:20.280 --> 01:06:30.520]  notary fraud and asked for and filed an objection to the appellee's incomplete disclosure statement
[01:06:30.520 --> 01:06:40.760]  in violation of rule 7.1B26.1 and 3.-410, disclosure of professional liability insurance.
[01:06:40.760 --> 01:06:47.120]  And I moved for a correction and supplement statement of all required information and
[01:06:47.120 --> 01:06:51.760]  disclosures and judicial notice proving notary fraud.
[01:06:51.760 --> 01:06:59.880]  Well, nobody responded, the other side didn't respond, so on the 25th of May, I filed a
[01:06:59.880 --> 01:07:06.040]  notice of non-opposition and again put an order in requesting the 60-day extension and
[01:07:06.040 --> 01:07:13.040]  asking the court to order them to file their complete disclosures within 10 days and for
[01:07:13.040 --> 01:07:16.680]  my extension to start the day they filed them.
[01:07:16.680 --> 01:07:18.200]  No response.
[01:07:18.200 --> 01:07:22.640]  I kept calling the court and they said, well, we're just waiting for the judges to respond.
[01:07:22.640 --> 01:07:26.600]  They're busy, they've had oral arguments, they've had this.
[01:07:26.600 --> 01:07:32.440]  So on the 14th, they said, well, if you file an official request, so I filed an official
[01:07:32.440 --> 01:07:35.880]  request for an extension on June 14th.
[01:07:35.880 --> 01:07:36.880]  Still nothing.
[01:07:36.880 --> 01:07:41.280]  And every day this week I called very politely and I said, is there any ruling?
[01:07:41.280 --> 01:07:46.320]  This is getting very prejudicial to me and my ability to do this.
[01:07:46.320 --> 01:07:53.200]  I filed the application for an extension under the Americans with Disabilities Act and some
[01:07:53.200 --> 01:08:00.640]  other and awaiting the court's ruling plus other things and I was waiting for the full
[01:08:00.640 --> 01:08:04.720]  disclosures so that I could properly formulate my case.
[01:08:04.720 --> 01:08:15.680]  Well, today I had one extension until June 23rd, which is tomorrow, and nothing since.
[01:08:15.680 --> 01:08:20.280]  So I kept calling and today I called again and yesterday I called and she said, well,
[01:08:20.280 --> 01:08:25.360]  if you don't hear anything, you can call back tomorrow, but we just have to wait for them
[01:08:25.360 --> 01:08:27.080]  to rule.
[01:08:27.080 --> 01:08:32.160]  And so same happened this morning, so I called again this afternoon and I said, well, I guess
[01:08:32.160 --> 01:08:38.600]  it's appearing very much like the judges are showing bias towards the other side by waiting
[01:08:38.600 --> 01:08:41.720]  for the last minute to rule, if any.
[01:08:41.720 --> 01:08:47.320]  I said, yesterday when I called, they said, well, we'll give you a 15-day notice, we'll
[01:08:47.320 --> 01:08:52.280]  give you a notice of default if you don't file anything and then you will have 15 days
[01:08:52.280 --> 01:08:53.280]  to respond.
[01:08:53.280 --> 01:08:57.080]  And this morning or this afternoon they said, oh no, that's not right.
[01:08:57.080 --> 01:08:59.640]  I said, well, that's what you told me yesterday.
[01:08:59.640 --> 01:09:02.640]  Oh, well, that wasn't correct.
[01:09:02.640 --> 01:09:05.600]  We don't issue a default notice on a reply brief.
[01:09:05.600 --> 01:09:10.360]  I said, well, how can I file my reply brief if I don't have the full information from
[01:09:10.360 --> 01:09:11.360]  the other side?
[01:09:11.360 --> 01:09:16.120]  And these judges, maybe I'll have to file a complaint against the judge.
[01:09:16.120 --> 01:09:18.800]  Could you tell me who the judges are on my case?
[01:09:18.800 --> 01:09:23.480]  Oh, well, we haven't appointed them until oral argument.
[01:09:23.480 --> 01:09:28.400]  And I said, well, how many judges are on this appellate?
[01:09:28.400 --> 01:09:33.360]  Well, there's four judges, but only three are appointed.
[01:09:33.360 --> 01:09:40.840]  And lo and behold, 30 minutes later, I get an order in the mail, in my email.
[01:09:40.840 --> 01:09:41.840]  But it's basically-
[01:09:41.840 --> 01:09:44.440]  Funny how that works.
[01:09:44.440 --> 01:09:47.160]  It is funny how that works.
[01:09:47.160 --> 01:09:52.280]  I got, it says on May the 5th, the appellant filed a motion and request and it gives the
[01:09:52.280 --> 01:09:53.280]  full title.
[01:09:53.280 --> 01:10:00.040]  And it says the motion and request for judicial notice are denied in their entirety.
[01:10:00.040 --> 01:10:05.800]  So they are not requiring the other side to file their full disclosures.
[01:10:05.800 --> 01:10:10.240]  They're denying my request for that.
[01:10:10.240 --> 01:10:13.800]  And then it says appellant's reply brief is due on June 23rd.
[01:10:13.800 --> 01:10:20.200]  On June 14th, the appellant filed a request for 60-day extension to begin the day that
[01:10:20.200 --> 01:10:26.000]  respondents file and serve their full disclosures as requested on May 5th.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:29.160]  The requested extension of time is denied.
[01:10:29.160 --> 01:10:34.420]  Appellant is granted a 30-day extension of time to file the reply brief and it shall
[01:10:34.420 --> 01:10:36.640]  be due on or before July 24th.
[01:10:36.640 --> 01:10:44.280]  No further extensions will be granted and it's signed by presiding justice, Gilbert,
[01:10:44.280 --> 01:10:48.360]  which is one of the ones I believe that was in my last appeal.
[01:10:48.360 --> 01:10:53.000]  So they're not forcing the other side to do what they're required to do.
[01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:56.800]  They've waited till the very last second to cause me more stress.
[01:10:56.800 --> 01:11:00.320]  If it was an attorney that did file that for the other side, they would have granted, you
[01:11:00.320 --> 01:11:04.720]  know, given them a decision within a week, I'm sure.
[01:11:04.720 --> 01:11:09.960]  So anyway, that's where the courts are at in their bias.
[01:11:09.960 --> 01:11:15.040]  They've already told me they were going to sanction me if I litigated again.
[01:11:15.040 --> 01:11:22.440]  The opposing side asked for the court to sanction me and order me to make restitution to some
[01:11:22.440 --> 01:11:24.720]  charity that they decide.
[01:11:24.720 --> 01:11:30.680]  They don't want it for themselves, God bless their little cotton socks, not for them just
[01:11:30.680 --> 01:11:37.240]  to show me that they are in charge and that they want me sanctioned some way.
[01:11:37.240 --> 01:11:44.800]  So where am I—if they don't require the other side to file their full disclosures,
[01:11:44.800 --> 01:11:48.560]  what remedy do I have for that?
[01:11:48.560 --> 01:11:52.320]  Are you there?
[01:11:52.320 --> 01:11:59.120]  Have I lost you all or—
[01:11:59.120 --> 01:12:00.600]  Randy, are you there?
[01:12:00.600 --> 01:12:05.560]  No, I don't know what would be a good remedy for that.
[01:12:05.560 --> 01:12:10.360]  That's something that you—if it would be me, I think all I would know to do is raise
[01:12:10.360 --> 01:12:17.200]  an exception, call it judicial error, and raise an exception and consider that as something
[01:12:17.200 --> 01:12:22.160]  that has to be appealed, either interlocutory order or mandamus.
[01:12:22.160 --> 01:12:29.040]  I was thinking, aren't you—are you in the trial court or the appellate court?
[01:12:29.040 --> 01:12:30.040]  Appellate court.
[01:12:30.040 --> 01:12:39.680]  Yes, I was thinking, can you do an interlocutory from an appellate court to the Supreme?
[01:12:39.680 --> 01:12:40.680]  The next up.
[01:12:40.680 --> 01:12:41.680]  Mm-hmm.
[01:12:41.680 --> 01:12:42.680]  I don't think you can.
[01:12:42.680 --> 01:12:48.720]  Are you doing a writ of mandamus to the Supreme Court, filing my reply brief, but also doing
[01:12:48.720 --> 01:12:55.720]  a writ of mandamus for, you know, making them do, you know, what they're supposed to do?
[01:12:55.720 --> 01:12:56.720]  Yeah.
[01:12:56.720 --> 01:12:59.720]  He's trying to follow the law.
[01:12:59.720 --> 01:13:12.360]  Have the judges recused or, you know, disqualified or biased?
[01:13:12.360 --> 01:13:14.560]  I'm thinking, and my head hurts.
[01:13:14.560 --> 01:13:29.880]  In that situation, I did a—I moved for the district judge to remove from office the offender.
[01:13:29.880 --> 01:13:35.000]  They had given me some guff about a mandamus and said, oh, it's going to have to have
[01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:39.120]  its own filing number and it's going to have to have its own filing fees and you're
[01:13:39.120 --> 01:13:43.080]  going to have to fill out this cover sheet form and all that other stuff.
[01:13:43.080 --> 01:13:46.880]  And I said, well, how about a motion to remove this guy from office?
[01:13:46.880 --> 01:13:51.400]  Incompetence, official misconduct, and that's not okay.
[01:13:51.400 --> 01:13:53.720]  So he's unfit for office.
[01:13:53.720 --> 01:13:59.720]  Of course, they didn't remove him from office, but that's how I addressed it.
[01:13:59.720 --> 01:14:02.600]  Well, they are incompetent.
[01:14:02.600 --> 01:14:11.120]  I mean, surely, if I filed this on May 5th, they should have ruled much sooner.
[01:14:11.120 --> 01:14:16.280]  And I just don't understand why the attorneys for the other side get to decide, well, we
[01:14:16.280 --> 01:14:18.160]  don't have to file full disclosures.
[01:14:18.160 --> 01:14:19.160]  We're not going to do it.
[01:14:19.160 --> 01:14:21.320]  We're not going to file our insurance disclosure.
[01:14:21.320 --> 01:14:23.560]  We're not going to file them.
[01:14:23.560 --> 01:14:30.280]  They actually—the bank that they're working for, which is implicated in this, has a new
[01:14:30.280 --> 01:14:31.280]  parent company.
[01:14:31.280 --> 01:14:34.960]  It's been sold to another bank as of last year.
[01:14:34.960 --> 01:14:38.200]  Surely they should be notified of any lawsuits.
[01:14:38.200 --> 01:14:41.800]  Maybe they should be an interested party.
[01:14:41.800 --> 01:14:47.480]  Hmm, that's interesting, too.
[01:14:47.480 --> 01:14:48.960]  Yeah.
[01:14:48.960 --> 01:14:49.960]  Have you notified them?
[01:14:49.960 --> 01:14:50.960]  I haven't noticed that.
[01:14:50.960 --> 01:14:51.960]  Pardon?
[01:14:51.960 --> 01:14:59.280]  No, I haven't notified that new bank, but maybe I should do that, yeah.
[01:14:59.280 --> 01:15:03.360]  Yes, they might not be happy having bought this lawsuit.
[01:15:03.360 --> 01:15:07.880]  That's a good point.
[01:15:07.880 --> 01:15:11.680]  They just might want it to go away.
[01:15:11.680 --> 01:15:12.680]  Yeah.
[01:15:12.680 --> 01:15:20.920]  And it's clear that they do not want to divulge any insurance that could take care of any
[01:15:20.920 --> 01:15:21.920]  of this.
[01:15:21.920 --> 01:15:22.920]  None.
[01:15:22.920 --> 01:15:25.680]  You mean like that Stowers claim?
[01:15:25.680 --> 01:15:26.680]  Uh-huh.
[01:15:26.680 --> 01:15:33.480]  They don't want to—because that's the one thing we were requesting, their insurance,
[01:15:33.480 --> 01:15:43.640]  because they're required to provide it, and they have not.
[01:15:43.640 --> 01:15:48.440]  So it's one rule for the attorneys and one rule for us, and it kind of goes back to what
[01:15:48.440 --> 01:15:54.280]  you were just talking about with the other guy in some ways, you know?
[01:15:54.280 --> 01:15:56.480]  They get to make their own rules.
[01:15:56.480 --> 01:16:02.180]  You might ask the court for the rules, that apparently there's one set of rules for attorneys
[01:16:02.180 --> 01:16:04.360]  and one set for litigants.
[01:16:04.360 --> 01:16:07.080]  Can you give us the rules for both?
[01:16:07.080 --> 01:16:08.080]  Okay.
[01:16:08.080 --> 01:16:09.080]  Sharks.
[01:16:09.080 --> 01:16:14.880]  Okay, well, I don't mind doing that.
[01:16:14.880 --> 01:16:24.320]  I mean, it's not gonna—anything I do is going to basically get them upset at me.
[01:16:24.320 --> 01:16:29.800]  They're already biased, and they've already decided this case before they've even read
[01:16:29.800 --> 01:16:30.800]  anything.
[01:16:30.800 --> 01:16:32.320]  They've already been decided by them.
[01:16:32.320 --> 01:16:35.440]  So what else can I say that will piss them off anymore?
[01:16:35.440 --> 01:16:36.440]  I don't care.
[01:16:36.440 --> 01:16:37.440]  Yeah.
[01:16:37.440 --> 01:16:38.440]  Yeah.
[01:16:38.440 --> 01:16:45.240]  At this point, if you can sting them, that may be the only thing you can do.
[01:16:45.240 --> 01:16:46.240]  Hang on.
[01:16:46.240 --> 01:16:52.240]  This is Randy Kelton, Rhett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, let's see.
[01:16:52.240 --> 01:17:01.200]  Call in number 512-646-1984, we'll be right back.
[01:17:01.200 --> 01:17:05.600]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[01:17:05.600 --> 01:17:06.600]  Word?
[01:17:06.600 --> 01:17:11.720]  Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[01:17:11.720 --> 01:17:18.120]  Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[01:17:18.120 --> 01:17:22.640]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly
[01:17:22.640 --> 01:17:25.040]  dividing the word of truth.
[01:17:25.040 --> 01:17:28.680]  Starting in January, our first-hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go
[01:17:28.680 --> 01:17:32.360]  verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[01:17:32.360 --> 01:17:37.000]  Our second-hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:39.360]  and Christian character development.
[01:17:39.360 --> 01:17:43.880]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:43.880 --> 01:17:48.200]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[01:17:48.200 --> 01:17:50.480]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[01:17:50.480 --> 01:17:57.120]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com, Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[01:17:57.120 --> 01:18:00.880]  motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[01:18:00.880 --> 01:18:05.600]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.600 --> 01:18:09.680]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:18:09.680 --> 01:18:14.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[01:18:14.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  can win two.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:19.840]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:18:19.840 --> 01:18:25.600]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:18:25.600 --> 01:18:30.280]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:18:30.280 --> 01:18:34.440]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.440 --> 01:18:39.560]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.560 --> 01:18:41.480]  Financial consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.480 --> 01:18:47.240]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:18:47.240 --> 01:18:50.200]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.200 --> 01:18:59.200]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:18:59.200 --> 01:19:02.200]  collectors now.
[01:19:02.200 --> 01:19:10.080]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:10.080 --> 01:19:36.640]  Ain't gonna blind me, don't bore me, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:36.640 --> 01:19:45.320]  I was blindsided but now I can see your plan, you put the fear in my pockets, took the money
[01:19:45.320 --> 01:19:52.040]  from my hand, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:52.040 --> 01:19:53.440]  Okay.
[01:19:53.440 --> 01:19:54.440]  We are back.
[01:19:54.440 --> 01:19:59.440]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio and we're talking to Tina in California
[01:19:59.440 --> 01:20:06.200]  and Dr. Joe and I were just talking about that problem today, that it appears as though
[01:20:06.200 --> 01:20:14.400]  the courts are just here to make the masses feel comfortable.
[01:20:14.400 --> 01:20:19.160]  The courts generally deal with about 4% of the population.
[01:20:19.160 --> 01:20:28.560]  So they're really there just to make the other 96% feel safe and comfortable.
[01:20:28.560 --> 01:20:33.080]  The only ones who trust the courts are the ones who've never dealt with them.
[01:20:33.080 --> 01:20:36.920]  So it's all for show.
[01:20:36.920 --> 01:20:42.160]  It does seem like the courts pretty well do whatever they want to and in what I'm doing,
[01:20:42.160 --> 01:20:48.800]  everything about what I'm doing is figuring out ways to beat them up, figuring out ways
[01:20:48.800 --> 01:20:55.120]  to go back after them and damage their careers and give them reasons to do it right and follow
[01:20:55.120 --> 01:20:56.120]  law.
[01:20:56.120 --> 01:21:00.680]  That's why I sued all the highest judges in Texas, worked out a way to sue them in their
[01:21:00.680 --> 01:21:03.200]  personal capacity.
[01:21:03.200 --> 01:21:09.800]  That's going to ruffle some feathers and maybe give them reason to do it right.
[01:21:09.800 --> 01:21:16.600]  They really don't think that there's any way I could ever get a claim against them.
[01:21:16.600 --> 01:21:20.060]  I believe that's the case.
[01:21:20.060 --> 01:21:27.520]  But in this case, we're pitting the federal court against the state court and you might
[01:21:27.520 --> 01:21:30.440]  consider that.
[01:21:30.440 --> 01:21:36.680]  The state courts pretty well got everything boxed up, but the feds in the states tend
[01:21:36.680 --> 01:21:42.720]  not to get along terribly well.
[01:21:42.720 --> 01:21:47.880]  So you might look at collecting the evidence you need to bring all these guys to the federal
[01:21:47.880 --> 01:21:48.880]  court.
[01:21:48.880 --> 01:21:55.760]  And I brought them on a Rico action.
[01:21:55.760 --> 01:22:03.400]  And if they are working together in concert and collusion, one with the other, to deny
[01:22:03.400 --> 01:22:07.840]  people in due process, you get it a Rico suit.
[01:22:07.840 --> 01:22:12.320]  That would be interesting, yes.
[01:22:12.320 --> 01:22:18.960]  I had a federal judge in Oklahoma tell me that filing a Rico suit's like dropping an
[01:22:18.960 --> 01:22:29.200]  atomic bomb, filing a Rico suit against public officials is like dropping an atomic bomb.
[01:22:29.200 --> 01:22:39.080]  A Rico suit against California, you and Ted, maybe a few others, then you get to air all
[01:22:39.080 --> 01:22:45.120]  their dirty laundry in front of the feds.
[01:22:45.120 --> 01:22:49.800]  You might make a change for a little while.
[01:22:49.800 --> 01:22:54.400]  Well maybe after this case is over, that's what I've got to do for sure.
[01:22:54.400 --> 01:23:00.880]  And it sort of goes with what you were telling the other guy too, but if they file for an
[01:23:00.880 --> 01:23:09.040]  extension and it's a time and it's not objective to, then it's defaulted to get the extension.
[01:23:09.040 --> 01:23:16.240]  Well, in my case, the other side never responded to any of it, not the objection to the motion,
[01:23:16.240 --> 01:23:20.640]  not the order, not the notice of non opposition.
[01:23:20.640 --> 01:23:27.600]  And they didn't respond to either way to the request for extension of time.
[01:23:27.600 --> 01:23:38.040]  And I said they've acquiesced to this, no, apparently not.
[01:23:38.040 --> 01:23:41.800]  They might've wanted the extension.
[01:23:41.800 --> 01:23:45.560]  But then the courts, it's to their discretion because they want to clear their docket.
[01:23:45.560 --> 01:23:47.560]  So they have a dog in that hunt.
[01:23:47.560 --> 01:23:54.040]  But if the other side didn't object to anything and they didn't-
[01:23:54.040 --> 01:23:57.400]  The court itself can have its own objections.
[01:23:57.400 --> 01:24:02.160]  If the court wants it off their docket and they want it done, they can go ahead and force
[01:24:02.160 --> 01:24:05.480]  both parties to get things done.
[01:24:05.480 --> 01:24:09.120]  So the court has discretion in that matter.
[01:24:09.120 --> 01:24:15.800]  Okay, what about the court if they did not respond to the fact that we asked the court
[01:24:15.800 --> 01:24:18.440]  to force them to file full disclosures?
[01:24:18.440 --> 01:24:22.320]  They did not object to that, but the court didn't rule.
[01:24:22.320 --> 01:24:27.120]  There's not much you can do except appeal.
[01:24:27.120 --> 01:24:30.200]  That's what the appellate process is for.
[01:24:30.200 --> 01:24:32.700]  And that's what the Supreme is for.
[01:24:32.700 --> 01:24:40.000]  You need to carve out a really contentious issue to bring to the Supreme.
[01:24:40.000 --> 01:24:46.800]  You need to bring something to the Supreme that needs the direction of the Supreme to
[01:24:46.800 --> 01:24:55.200]  maintain the sanctity of the corpus juris.
[01:24:55.200 --> 01:24:59.200]  You need to be able to show that what they're doing is breaking down the public trust in
[01:24:59.200 --> 01:25:03.000]  the entire system.
[01:25:03.000 --> 01:25:11.680]  Give them something they can order changed so that it corrects something beyond you.
[01:25:11.680 --> 01:25:17.880]  In my case, I'm saying just order them to call a magistrate on the phone.
[01:25:17.880 --> 01:25:27.760]  It's a relatively easy fix that will disrupt everything that's going on.
[01:25:27.760 --> 01:25:32.120]  What will disrupt this behavior?
[01:25:32.120 --> 01:25:40.600]  What change can you make or what is in law that would keep this kind of problem from
[01:25:40.600 --> 01:25:47.560]  occurring that they're not following?
[01:25:47.560 --> 01:25:51.000]  And everything you're doing should be about appeal.
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:57.600]  Now, you're in the appellate court, but everything you're doing should be about what you can
[01:25:57.600 --> 01:25:59.520]  bring to the Supreme.
[01:25:59.520 --> 01:26:03.320]  Yes, and it is.
[01:26:03.320 --> 01:26:04.320]  Yeah.
[01:26:04.320 --> 01:26:12.440]  Well, I'm going to keep going and I just wanted to update you about how you're going because
[01:26:12.440 --> 01:26:16.760]  they leave it to the last second and I'll let you go to the next corner and thanks for
[01:26:16.760 --> 01:26:17.760]  the first call.
[01:26:17.760 --> 01:26:18.760]  Okay.
[01:26:18.760 --> 01:26:19.760]  Thank you, Tina.
[01:26:19.760 --> 01:26:20.760]  Okay.
[01:26:20.760 --> 01:26:21.760]  Bye-bye.
[01:26:21.760 --> 01:26:23.840]  Now we're going to go to Chris in New York.
[01:26:23.840 --> 01:26:26.040]  Chris, are you awake this time?
[01:26:26.040 --> 01:26:29.360]  I'm awake.
[01:26:29.360 --> 01:26:31.480]  I think you were asleep last week.
[01:26:31.480 --> 01:26:35.080]  We tried to get you and we couldn't quite hear you snoring.
[01:26:35.080 --> 01:26:38.320]  We did hear Tina snoring once though.
[01:26:38.320 --> 01:26:39.320]  Okay.
[01:26:39.320 --> 01:26:45.960]  We're never letting you do that.
[01:26:45.960 --> 01:26:48.080]  Okay.
[01:26:48.080 --> 01:26:50.080]  What do you have for us today?
[01:26:50.080 --> 01:26:51.080]  Okay.
[01:26:51.080 --> 01:26:55.120]  So just a quick update.
[01:26:55.120 --> 01:27:01.640]  Mine was about the bar grieving committee not doing their job, and then you told me
[01:27:01.640 --> 01:27:09.560]  to basically bar grieve the bar grieving committee themselves and send them letters of intent
[01:27:09.560 --> 01:27:10.560]  to sue.
[01:27:10.560 --> 01:27:20.440]  I did that and then I decided to give them another chance, so I figured out 12 more bar
[01:27:20.440 --> 01:27:25.640]  grieving citizens signed to them and the system seems to be working now.
[01:27:25.640 --> 01:27:32.840]  They all came back in 30 days and they were all cc'd to the lawyer that the bar grievance
[01:27:32.840 --> 01:27:34.840]  was against.
[01:27:34.840 --> 01:27:40.520]  The prior, the first one that they were holding on to, there was three of them.
[01:27:40.520 --> 01:27:45.280]  Two of them were the lawyers in my federal civil case and one of them was just a lawyer
[01:27:45.280 --> 01:27:48.440]  that shouldn't have messed with me at one time.
[01:27:48.440 --> 01:27:57.200]  And you know, he went after my father and basically did some very scoundrelish things,
[01:27:57.200 --> 01:27:59.200]  so I bar grieved him.
[01:27:59.200 --> 01:28:05.200]  And the interesting thing is they did send that back after four months, but they never
[01:28:05.200 --> 01:28:07.600]  cc'd the lawyer.
[01:28:07.600 --> 01:28:12.640]  So I'm just, and they told me that it was because I didn't have first-hand knowledge
[01:28:12.640 --> 01:28:21.840]  even though that I was using the transcripts to basically base the bar grievance off of,
[01:28:21.840 --> 01:28:25.800]  that I couldn't do that.
[01:28:25.800 --> 01:28:31.280]  But anyways, then what happened is that, like I said, I gave them another chance.
[01:28:31.280 --> 01:28:35.720]  The 12 bar grievances all at once, they all came back in 30 days.
[01:28:35.720 --> 01:28:37.760]  I took five of them in New York.
[01:28:37.760 --> 01:28:40.720]  You can write a letter of reconsideration.
[01:28:40.720 --> 01:28:41.720]  I did that.
[01:28:41.720 --> 01:28:48.240]  I wanted them to reconsider five of them because they're, you know, I think they're legitimate.
[01:28:48.240 --> 01:28:56.360]  And they basically have to do like the county attorney and FOIA request and how they were
[01:28:56.360 --> 01:28:58.680]  not following the law.
[01:28:58.680 --> 01:29:01.120]  And it became a pattern.
[01:29:01.120 --> 01:29:07.080]  And I would call them all the time and try to talk to the county attorney because they
[01:29:07.080 --> 01:29:11.880]  finally just put it in a paralegal's hands so I couldn't bargain with anybody.
[01:29:11.880 --> 01:29:17.800]  So I wanted to talk to the supervisor and the supervisor at the paralegal told me it
[01:29:17.800 --> 01:29:19.840]  was the county attorney.
[01:29:19.840 --> 01:29:25.400]  So he refuses to talk to me and I keep sending him emails, you know, I want to know about
[01:29:25.400 --> 01:29:31.000]  the official process to write an official complaint against the paralegal because he's
[01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  not doing his job.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  He's not following the law.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:46.880]  So basically what I'm trying to do is potentially set them up for just kind of like a 1983 lawsuit
[01:29:46.880 --> 01:29:52.520]  because it's the policy to deny people their rights to access the single.
[01:29:52.520 --> 01:29:53.520]  Okay.
[01:29:53.520 --> 01:29:54.520]  Okay.
[01:29:54.520 --> 01:29:55.520]  Hang on.
[01:29:55.520 --> 01:29:56.520]  Hang on.
[01:29:56.520 --> 01:29:57.520]  Back to you.
[01:29:57.520 --> 01:29:58.520]  Our sponsor is Randy Kelton, Brat Fountain, Rue of Law Radio.
[01:29:58.520 --> 01:30:09.000]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps
[01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  on growing.
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:13.120]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:30:13.120 --> 01:30:17.240]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:30:17.240 --> 01:30:18.960]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.960 --> 01:30:22.560]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.560 --> 01:30:27.560]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.560 --> 01:30:32.840]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.840 --> 01:30:35.320]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.320 --> 01:30:40.920]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.920 --> 01:30:42.660]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.660 --> 01:30:44.600]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.600 --> 01:30:48.880]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:48.880 --> 01:30:54.520]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart, but think again, all that stress
[01:30:54.520 --> 01:30:56.760]  might be eating your brain.
[01:30:56.760 --> 01:31:01.360]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons, which actually
[01:31:01.360 --> 01:31:04.920]  makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:31:04.920 --> 01:31:08.880]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less gray matter
[01:31:08.880 --> 01:31:11.160]  in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:31:11.160 --> 01:31:16.320]  That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:31:16.320 --> 01:31:18.560]  So take a deep breath and chill out.
[01:31:18.560 --> 01:31:21.520]  It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:31:21.520 --> 01:31:31.640]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.640 --> 01:31:37.040]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:37.040 --> 01:31:39.120]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.120 --> 01:31:44.080]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.080 --> 01:31:46.760]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.760 --> 01:31:49.520]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.520 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.360]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.360 --> 01:31:54.360]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.360 --> 01:31:55.360]  I'm a father.
[01:31:55.360 --> 01:31:56.360]  Who lost his son.
[01:31:56.360 --> 01:31:57.360]  We're Americans.
[01:31:57.360 --> 01:31:58.600]  And we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.600 --> 01:32:00.600]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.600 --> 01:32:06.080]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[01:32:06.080 --> 01:32:09.880]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[01:32:09.880 --> 01:32:13.480]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.480 --> 01:32:17.040]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:17.040 --> 01:32:20.720]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.720 --> 01:32:24.880]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[01:32:24.880 --> 01:32:26.280]  our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.280 --> 01:32:30.240]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:30.240 --> 01:32:34.000]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:34.000 --> 01:32:36.400]  is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.400 --> 01:32:40.400]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:40.400 --> 01:32:41.720]  ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.720 --> 01:32:44.960]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:44.960 --> 01:32:49.480]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:49.480 --> 01:32:51.800]  documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.800 --> 01:32:55.760]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.760 --> 01:33:01.120]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:01.120 --> 01:33:07.680]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:07.680 --> 01:33:20.400]  Yeah, and who you want to chip, who you take me for, free Tully?
[01:33:20.400 --> 01:33:23.400]  Who you want to chip?
[01:33:23.400 --> 01:33:24.400]  Me no free Tully.
[01:33:24.400 --> 01:33:25.400]  You can't chip me.
[01:33:25.400 --> 01:33:26.400]  All me say, don't let them chip you in the morning, chip you in the evening, put a chip
[01:33:26.400 --> 01:33:27.400]  in your body.
[01:33:27.400 --> 01:33:32.400]  And anyway you go computer reading, you can't hide me say from nobody, when me say, chip
[01:33:32.400 --> 01:33:37.400]  in on your mom, chip in on your daddy, chip in on your granny, chip in on your granny,
[01:33:37.400 --> 01:33:38.400]  chip in on your daddy.
[01:33:38.400 --> 01:33:47.400]  We got Chris on the line and he is working over State Bar Grievance Committee in New
[01:33:47.400 --> 01:33:48.400]  York.
[01:33:48.400 --> 01:33:54.840]  Now from what I've seen of New York, they tend to have a pretty good bar.
[01:33:54.840 --> 01:34:01.760]  We got a couple of lawyers sanctioned in New York a few years ago.
[01:34:01.760 --> 01:34:05.060]  And I was surprised that they took them on.
[01:34:05.060 --> 01:34:10.060]  They've got, unlike Texas has one committee,
[01:34:10.540 --> 01:34:13.560]  New York has different committees for different regions.
[01:34:15.060 --> 01:34:20.060]  So, you're thinking of suing the bar under RICO.
[01:34:20.940 --> 01:34:22.580]  I think that's a great idea.
[01:34:27.940 --> 01:34:32.940]  So the finish of the story is after the county attorney
[01:34:32.940 --> 01:34:36.180]  got a supervisory bar grievance
[01:34:36.180 --> 01:34:39.760]  for not supervising the paralegal properly,
[01:34:40.740 --> 01:34:43.540]  the county clerk has decided to take over
[01:34:43.540 --> 01:34:47.060]  and now she handles everything and she's following the law.
[01:34:47.060 --> 01:34:50.400]  That's how bar grievance helped me there.
[01:34:51.620 --> 01:34:56.180]  So those three bar grievances against the,
[01:34:56.180 --> 01:34:58.620]  you know, the bar grievance committee,
[01:34:58.620 --> 01:35:01.460]  well, like you were talking about,
[01:35:01.460 --> 01:35:03.380]  are different judicial districts.
[01:35:03.380 --> 01:35:05.540]  I'm in the fifth judicial district
[01:35:05.540 --> 01:35:10.460]  where I'm having all these issues with attorneys
[01:35:10.460 --> 01:35:14.020]  and they decided to kind of do something kind of smart.
[01:35:14.020 --> 01:35:16.780]  They sent it to the third judicial district,
[01:35:16.780 --> 01:35:19.260]  have them review the bar grievances
[01:35:19.260 --> 01:35:21.380]  against the fifth judicial district
[01:35:21.380 --> 01:35:25.300]  and the chief counsel, Sydney Kelly.
[01:35:25.300 --> 01:35:26.740]  She sits over everybody.
[01:35:28.380 --> 01:35:31.140]  So when you do a reconsideration letter,
[01:35:31.140 --> 01:35:35.700]  it goes to the chief counsel at the bar grievance committee
[01:35:35.700 --> 01:35:39.420]  and one copy goes to her so that she's aware
[01:35:39.420 --> 01:35:43.540]  that you're asking for reconsideration of their decision.
[01:35:43.540 --> 01:35:46.140]  But what was interesting about the three letters
[01:35:46.140 --> 01:35:48.100]  that come from the third judicial district
[01:35:48.100 --> 01:35:50.300]  about the fifth judicial district
[01:35:50.300 --> 01:35:53.380]  bar grievance committee members
[01:35:53.380 --> 01:35:56.940]  is that the letter was almost standard
[01:35:56.940 --> 01:36:01.540]  to like any other letter except that
[01:36:01.540 --> 01:36:03.340]  instead of having the attorney's name,
[01:36:03.340 --> 01:36:08.340]  it said a attorney and instead of at the end
[01:36:08.420 --> 01:36:13.420]  being cc'd to that attorney, it wasn't cc'd to anybody.
[01:36:16.620 --> 01:36:20.220]  I don't think they're, like what I'm trying to get at, Randy,
[01:36:20.220 --> 01:36:23.180]  is the law says that it has to go to the lawyer.
[01:36:23.180 --> 01:36:26.180]  That's why every other bar grievance I've ever done
[01:36:26.180 --> 01:36:28.860]  except the one about that lawyer
[01:36:28.860 --> 01:36:30.300]  that they held for four months,
[01:36:30.300 --> 01:36:35.300]  that they said basically that because I didn't have standing,
[01:36:36.020 --> 01:36:37.020]  that's what the lady used.
[01:36:37.020 --> 01:36:42.020]  I didn't have standing and I was using the transcripts.
[01:36:42.180 --> 01:36:43.760]  My father would have to do it.
[01:36:44.660 --> 01:36:46.280]  It was never cc'd to him.
[01:36:47.140 --> 01:36:51.340]  And these three people, it was never cc'd to them.
[01:36:51.340 --> 01:36:52.180]  And they didn't even,
[01:36:52.180 --> 01:36:54.700]  and the letter doesn't even address their name.
[01:36:54.700 --> 01:36:57.620]  So all three are like identical letters
[01:36:57.620 --> 01:37:00.320]  and they came in three different, you know, envelope.
[01:37:00.320 --> 01:37:02.300]  I'm just like, I wonder which attorney
[01:37:02.300 --> 01:37:04.100]  they're talking about with this one.
[01:37:06.020 --> 01:37:08.640]  That should get a request for clarification.
[01:37:10.200 --> 01:37:11.040]  Okay.
[01:37:12.260 --> 01:37:14.580]  I want to know about FOIA.
[01:37:15.780 --> 01:37:18.820]  Well, before you take the FOIA,
[01:37:18.820 --> 01:37:20.300]  let me just speak to this real quickly
[01:37:20.300 --> 01:37:24.880]  about the anonymous, they don't tell you
[01:37:24.880 --> 01:37:27.380]  which attorney they're talking about.
[01:37:27.380 --> 01:37:29.920]  One thing that I've found that you can do.
[01:37:31.500 --> 01:37:33.180]  Texas stopped doing this.
[01:37:33.180 --> 01:37:38.180]  When I started doing, when I started adding onto my address,
[01:37:39.020 --> 01:37:44.020]  I added an indicator that was like inside my address,
[01:37:44.340 --> 01:37:49.340]  I put a hash or pound sign, octothorpe,
[01:37:49.340 --> 01:37:54.340]  and then I put the initials of the attorney
[01:37:54.420 --> 01:37:57.580]  that I'm grieving and an incremental number
[01:37:57.580 --> 01:38:00.100]  for which grievance it is for that attorney.
[01:38:00.100 --> 01:38:02.820]  So it would come up looking like something,
[01:38:02.820 --> 01:38:07.820]  it would say, you know, pound KLM3 inside of my address.
[01:38:08.940 --> 01:38:12.460]  So then when the Barg Grievance Committee
[01:38:12.460 --> 01:38:16.220]  sends me the letter, I know which one they're talking about
[01:38:16.220 --> 01:38:17.540]  based on the address.
[01:38:17.540 --> 01:38:21.380]  And then when I started doing that,
[01:38:21.380 --> 01:38:23.060]  they did it for a while,
[01:38:23.060 --> 01:38:26.420]  and then they stopped their silly idea
[01:38:26.420 --> 01:38:27.860]  of trying to keep it a secret,
[01:38:27.860 --> 01:38:30.460]  and they just started putting the name into there.
[01:38:30.460 --> 01:38:32.720]  So I don't know if you might consider that.
[01:38:33.780 --> 01:38:37.740]  Somebody probably looked at it and realized what that was.
[01:38:37.740 --> 01:38:42.740]  Yep, that is a pretty clever trick.
[01:38:45.540 --> 01:38:49.260]  Yeah, that's all right.
[01:38:49.260 --> 01:38:51.420]  So, I mean, I'm gonna have to try that
[01:38:51.420 --> 01:38:54.100]  in the rest of my mailings.
[01:38:54.100 --> 01:38:56.400]  You know, I do that when I save files.
[01:38:57.700 --> 01:38:59.940]  I'll save the file by the person's name,
[01:38:59.940 --> 01:39:04.940]  and then the year, month, day, and then what it is.
[01:39:04.940 --> 01:39:07.940]  So I can take that file and print it out,
[01:39:07.940 --> 01:39:10.940]  and I've got a footer in it that also says what it is,
[01:39:10.940 --> 01:39:13.940]  and scatter it all over the floor with all of my files,
[01:39:13.940 --> 01:39:16.940]  and I know exactly where every piece of paper goes.
[01:39:18.540 --> 01:39:21.940]  So to do this with the dates, that's great.
[01:39:22.940 --> 01:39:25.940]  So every time I get a mailing,
[01:39:26.940 --> 01:39:29.940]  then I know exactly where it goes, who it goes to.
[01:39:29.940 --> 01:39:31.940]  I'm glad you thought of that.
[01:39:32.940 --> 01:39:34.940]  That's why you get the big bucks here.
[01:39:35.940 --> 01:39:38.940]  All right, so you were gonna ask about FOIA.
[01:39:38.940 --> 01:39:40.940]  What's on your mind about FOIA?
[01:39:40.940 --> 01:39:42.940]  Yeah, I was hearing you guys saying
[01:39:42.940 --> 01:39:45.940]  that you can request email and stuff.
[01:39:45.940 --> 01:39:46.940]  Is that correct?
[01:39:46.940 --> 01:39:48.940]  Because they're telling me I can't request email.
[01:39:49.940 --> 01:39:52.940]  Well, we can certainly request them here.
[01:39:52.940 --> 01:39:53.940]  Yeah.
[01:39:54.940 --> 01:39:56.940]  If they're on our website,
[01:39:56.940 --> 01:40:00.940]  if they're on a government machine,
[01:40:00.940 --> 01:40:03.940]  absolutely, they're part of Open Records.
[01:40:05.940 --> 01:40:07.940]  Now, whether they want you to request it or not,
[01:40:07.940 --> 01:40:09.940]  that might be a different question.
[01:40:11.940 --> 01:40:13.940]  And they're saying the wrong thing.
[01:40:13.940 --> 01:40:15.940]  They're saying you can't request them.
[01:40:15.940 --> 01:40:17.940]  Of course you can request them.
[01:40:17.940 --> 01:40:20.940]  What they should be saying is we're not allowed
[01:40:20.940 --> 01:40:23.940]  to produce them under this statute.
[01:40:23.940 --> 01:40:27.940]  Right, cite some reason why they get to withhold it from you.
[01:40:28.940 --> 01:40:30.940]  Otherwise, those are your records.
[01:40:30.940 --> 01:40:32.940]  These are your people that work for you.
[01:40:32.940 --> 01:40:36.940]  Every record they keep is for your purposes, supposedly.
[01:40:38.940 --> 01:40:40.940]  Those are your computers.
[01:40:40.940 --> 01:40:42.940]  They don't give a statute or anything,
[01:40:42.940 --> 01:40:48.940]  but they just state that it's because it's intercommunications.
[01:40:49.940 --> 01:40:51.940]  What's that, Randy, you'd like to say?
[01:40:51.940 --> 01:40:53.940]  Did you just make that up?
[01:40:53.940 --> 01:40:54.940]  Yes.
[01:40:54.940 --> 01:40:56.940]  Where'd you get that?
[01:40:58.940 --> 01:40:59.940]  I'm telling you.
[01:40:59.940 --> 01:41:02.940]  I'm reading what the clerk sent me.
[01:41:04.940 --> 01:41:05.940]  Wait a minute.
[01:41:05.940 --> 01:41:07.940]  You actually believe what they sent you?
[01:41:08.940 --> 01:41:10.940]  No, I didn't say I believed it.
[01:41:10.940 --> 01:41:14.940]  I just thought it was odd that I can't access it.
[01:41:15.940 --> 01:41:16.940]  Well...
[01:41:16.940 --> 01:41:19.940]  Because I've been looking for any emails in the last two years
[01:41:19.940 --> 01:41:21.940]  that had Chris Roberts, my name in it.
[01:41:21.940 --> 01:41:26.940]  So that way I could see if they were talking behind my back.
[01:41:27.940 --> 01:41:29.940]  Oh, they know immediately what that's about
[01:41:29.940 --> 01:41:31.940]  and they don't want to show that to you.
[01:41:31.940 --> 01:41:35.940]  They're hoping that if they just tell you that you can't have that,
[01:41:35.940 --> 01:41:37.940]  then maybe you'll just go away.
[01:41:39.940 --> 01:41:40.940]  So appeal it.
[01:41:41.940 --> 01:41:43.940]  Absolutely appeal it.
[01:41:43.940 --> 01:41:44.940]  Okay.
[01:41:44.940 --> 01:41:48.940]  And you might actually get, even if that is a rule,
[01:41:48.940 --> 01:41:50.940]  you might get it overturned.
[01:41:52.940 --> 01:41:53.940]  Okay.
[01:41:53.940 --> 01:41:56.940]  And then everybody will really be upset at these guys.
[01:41:59.940 --> 01:42:02.940]  You got to be careful of what questions you get asked
[01:42:02.940 --> 01:42:04.940]  or what questions you answer.
[01:42:05.940 --> 01:42:08.940]  I'd like to go to the case, the Jasenowski case.
[01:42:09.940 --> 01:42:12.940]  It's a foreclosure, $100,000 house.
[01:42:13.940 --> 01:42:16.940]  And the guy buys the house and he got upset.
[01:42:16.940 --> 01:42:18.940]  He found something he didn't like.
[01:42:18.940 --> 01:42:22.940]  He rescinded it within the, I think it was a five-day time limit.
[01:42:22.940 --> 01:42:24.940]  At the last minute, he rescinded it.
[01:42:25.940 --> 01:42:27.940]  And the bank said,
[01:42:27.940 --> 01:42:29.940]  well, you got to give me the property back,
[01:42:29.940 --> 01:42:30.940]  then I'll give you your money back.
[01:42:30.940 --> 01:42:31.940]  And he said, no, no, no, no.
[01:42:31.940 --> 01:42:33.940]  You got to give me my money back first,
[01:42:33.940 --> 01:42:35.940]  then you get the property.
[01:42:35.940 --> 01:42:37.940]  So they went to court.
[01:42:37.940 --> 01:42:43.940]  They fought this all the way to the supreme over $100,000 property.
[01:42:43.940 --> 01:42:51.940]  And the supreme stuck it to the banks and broke it off in them.
[01:42:52.940 --> 01:42:57.940]  And said, you have to give the borrower back every dime he gave you first.
[01:42:58.940 --> 01:43:00.940]  Then he gives you back the property.
[01:43:01.940 --> 01:43:04.940]  You can't take the property and leave him on the street
[01:43:04.940 --> 01:43:06.940]  while you decide when you're going to send him his money.
[01:43:06.940 --> 01:43:08.940]  You got to send him his money first.
[01:43:08.940 --> 01:43:10.940]  So they stuck it to the banks.
[01:43:10.940 --> 01:43:19.940]  And my question was, who was the moron who took this stupid case all the way to the supreme?
[01:43:20.940 --> 01:43:22.940]  You should have just paid it.
[01:43:22.940 --> 01:43:30.940]  We just got a ruling out of the Fifth Circuit where a guy was holed up in this woman's home.
[01:43:31.940 --> 01:43:33.940]  And he broke in.
[01:43:33.940 --> 01:43:35.940]  The daughter was living there.
[01:43:35.940 --> 01:43:36.940]  She escaped.
[01:43:36.940 --> 01:43:40.940]  And SWAT went in and got him out and tore up the home.
[01:43:41.940 --> 01:43:43.940]  $70,000 worth of damage.
[01:43:43.940 --> 01:43:44.940]  The city said, too bad.
[01:43:44.940 --> 01:43:47.940]  You're out of luck that we were doing our civic duty.
[01:43:48.940 --> 01:43:53.940]  The guy sued them under an imminent domain and said it was an improper taking and won.
[01:43:53.940 --> 01:43:56.940]  And now the other states are hoping they don't appeal it.
[01:43:56.940 --> 01:43:57.940]  Hang on, Randy Kelton.
[01:43:57.940 --> 01:44:20.940]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:27.940 --> 01:44:32.940]  Troll, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[01:44:32.940 --> 01:44:33.940]  Bye bye, yucky cookies.
[01:44:33.940 --> 01:44:40.940]  Now I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side.
[01:44:40.940 --> 01:44:41.940]  Bookmark the link.
[01:44:41.940 --> 01:44:46.940]  And I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[01:44:46.940 --> 01:44:48.940]  New cookies for me?
[01:44:48.940 --> 01:44:50.940]  Consider it an early Christmas present.
[01:44:50.940 --> 01:44:56.940]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network, too.
[01:44:56.940 --> 01:44:57.940]  Fee is for cookie.
[01:44:57.940 --> 01:44:59.940]  Fee is for classified.
[01:45:00.940 --> 01:45:03.940]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.940 --> 01:45:14.940]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.940 --> 01:45:18.940]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.940 --> 01:45:22.940]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.940 --> 01:45:27.940]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[01:45:27.940 --> 01:45:33.940]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.940 --> 01:45:42.940]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.940 --> 01:45:51.940]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.940 --> 01:46:00.940]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.940 --> 01:46:26.940]  Some things in this world I will never understand.
[01:46:26.940 --> 01:46:30.940]  Some things I realize fully.
[01:46:30.940 --> 01:46:35.940]  Somebody's on a police, a policeman.
[01:46:35.940 --> 01:46:39.940]  Somebody's on a police, a police.
[01:46:39.940 --> 01:46:43.940]  There's always a room at the top of the hill.
[01:46:43.940 --> 01:46:48.940]  I hear through the grave mine and it's lonely left too.
[01:46:48.940 --> 01:46:52.940]  They're wishing it was more than our position to fill.
[01:46:52.940 --> 01:46:56.940]  They know that if they don't do it, somebody will.
[01:46:56.940 --> 01:46:59.940]  Some things in this world I will never understand.
[01:46:59.940 --> 01:47:00.940]  Okay, we are back.
[01:47:00.940 --> 01:47:02.940]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:47:02.940 --> 01:47:05.940]  And, Chris, this is great.
[01:47:05.940 --> 01:47:08.940]  How to beat up the bar.
[01:47:08.940 --> 01:47:10.940]  But are you about done?
[01:47:10.940 --> 01:47:11.940]  Where were we?
[01:47:11.940 --> 01:47:20.940]  No, I got one more thing that's totally not about something else that was triggered from listening to you guys.
[01:47:20.940 --> 01:47:27.940]  I always say that you have to have authority in law in order for a public official to be able to do something to you.
[01:47:27.940 --> 01:47:33.940]  And you guys were talking about real estate and property taxes.
[01:47:33.940 --> 01:47:42.940]  And in New York under Title I, real property tax law, there's two categories.
[01:47:42.940 --> 01:47:48.940]  There's mixed use property, residential and rental units mixed together.
[01:47:48.940 --> 01:47:53.940]  And then there's non-residential property.
[01:47:53.940 --> 01:47:56.940]  And there's no other category.
[01:47:56.940 --> 01:48:08.940]  And then they go through and they talk about how they can do assessments for these two categories and the type of assessments they can do and how they can come to that assessed value.
[01:48:08.940 --> 01:48:10.940]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:48:10.940 --> 01:48:14.940]  Do they not have a category for single family dwellings?
[01:48:14.940 --> 01:48:15.940]  No, sir.
[01:48:15.940 --> 01:48:17.940]  That's what I'm trying to tell you.
[01:48:17.940 --> 01:48:26.940]  So now, but if you go to 300, it's just a paragraph and it's basically real property.
[01:48:26.940 --> 01:48:29.940]  All real property is subject to taxation.
[01:48:29.940 --> 01:48:35.940]  And the form used to transfer property in New York State is a real property.
[01:48:35.940 --> 01:48:39.940]  So how is real property defined in New York?
[01:48:39.940 --> 01:48:42.940]  Well, here's the thing, Randy.
[01:48:42.940 --> 01:48:47.940]  It's just it's the real property.
[01:48:47.940 --> 01:48:57.940]  When you read it, it's talking about like commercial things, you know, and it says it can be all property.
[01:48:57.940 --> 01:48:59.940]  That's what I was getting to.
[01:48:59.940 --> 01:49:13.940]  If if they only speak to dual use properties with residential and rental and commercial property, then and they call they're speaking to real property.
[01:49:13.940 --> 01:49:16.940]  Is that what real property means?
[01:49:16.940 --> 01:49:25.940]  So does a single family dwelling that's lived in by the owner, is it real property under New York law?
[01:49:25.940 --> 01:49:29.940]  It is if you have it if it's registered as real property.
[01:49:29.940 --> 01:49:37.940]  And the reason I'm calling you is because I'm trying to read this are the RPP 404A.
[01:49:37.940 --> 01:49:44.940]  It would draw from registration in certain instances from real property.
[01:49:44.940 --> 01:49:48.940]  And it's got some weird language in here because it's really old.
[01:49:48.940 --> 01:49:53.940]  And when I'm thinking otherwise, they would they would say residential.
[01:49:53.940 --> 01:49:56.940]  This is how you put an assessment on a residential house.
[01:49:56.940 --> 01:49:57.940]  Why don't they say that?
[01:49:57.940 --> 01:49:59.940]  There's there's no authority.
[01:49:59.940 --> 01:50:02.940]  I fully requested this from the county and the town.
[01:50:02.940 --> 01:50:04.940]  The town does assessments in New York state.
[01:50:04.940 --> 01:50:11.940]  The town, the FOIA request was where is your authority to put an assessment on my property?
[01:50:11.940 --> 01:50:13.940]  OK, hold on, hold on.
[01:50:13.940 --> 01:50:15.940]  Can you call in tomorrow night?
[01:50:15.940 --> 01:50:26.940]  I want to get Alphonse on because he is a property tax guy.
[01:50:26.940 --> 01:50:28.940]  I'd like you and him to discuss this.
[01:50:28.940 --> 01:50:31.940]  He's out of Pennsylvania, but he's real deep into property tax.
[01:50:31.940 --> 01:50:37.940]  I've ran this by him and he's just trying to think that every state is set up the same way.
[01:50:37.940 --> 01:50:43.940]  And I don't think that's the case because I've read Florida's, you know, Steve Emerson.
[01:50:43.940 --> 01:50:48.940]  I've read Alphonse and it's pretty clear like where they're coming from.
[01:50:48.940 --> 01:50:52.940]  It's just it's different in New York state is all I'm saying.
[01:50:52.940 --> 01:51:00.940]  And there's no authority in law for them to put an assessment on my on my residential property where I live and do.
[01:51:00.940 --> 01:51:01.940]  There's no commerce.
[01:51:01.940 --> 01:51:04.940]  There's there's no status with this place.
[01:51:04.940 --> 01:51:08.940]  I don't have a business license here.
[01:51:08.940 --> 01:51:11.940]  I just live here.
[01:51:11.940 --> 01:51:15.940]  I'd like to discuss this further, but I got two more callers.
[01:51:15.940 --> 01:51:16.940]  OK, I'll let you know.
[01:51:16.940 --> 01:51:18.940]  And this is something to take more time.
[01:51:18.940 --> 01:51:22.940]  I'd like to do this call in tomorrow night and don't go to sleep on me.
[01:51:22.940 --> 01:51:25.940]  I'll try not to.
[01:51:25.940 --> 01:51:28.940]  We'll pull you up early.
[01:51:28.940 --> 01:51:30.940]  OK, thank you.
[01:51:30.940 --> 01:51:32.940]  OK, thank you, Chris.
[01:51:32.940 --> 01:51:36.940]  OK, now we're going to Dr. Joe.
[01:51:36.940 --> 01:51:43.940]  Dr. Joe is on our call in line if I can get this thing to unmute.
[01:51:43.940 --> 01:51:48.940]  Brett, my page is not working.
[01:51:48.940 --> 01:51:49.940]  All right, there he is.
[01:51:49.940 --> 01:51:54.940]  Hey, Dr. Joe.
[01:51:54.940 --> 01:51:56.940]  Huh.
[01:51:56.940 --> 01:52:01.940]  Well, maybe he was not planning to be called in.
[01:52:01.940 --> 01:52:05.940]  Mine shows he's still muted.
[01:52:05.940 --> 01:52:06.940]  No, he's he's.
[01:52:06.940 --> 01:52:09.940]  Oh, there it is. OK, I refreshed.
[01:52:09.940 --> 01:52:12.940]  Are you there, Dr. Joe?
[01:52:12.940 --> 01:52:15.940]  OK, maybe we put him to sleep.
[01:52:15.940 --> 01:52:17.940]  But then he's old.
[01:52:17.940 --> 01:52:19.940]  He is so old.
[01:52:19.940 --> 01:52:22.940]  He's nearly as old as I am.
[01:52:22.940 --> 01:52:23.940]  Oh, my goodness.
[01:52:23.940 --> 01:52:25.940]  Yeah.
[01:52:25.940 --> 01:52:28.940]  OK, let's go to Ted in California.
[01:52:28.940 --> 01:52:32.940]  Hello, Ted.
[01:52:32.940 --> 01:52:33.940]  Good evening, Dr.
[01:52:33.940 --> 01:52:35.940]  Kelton.
[01:52:35.940 --> 01:52:38.940]  And this was Ted in Oregon.
[01:52:38.940 --> 01:52:39.940]  In Oregon.
[01:52:39.940 --> 01:52:41.940]  OK.
[01:52:41.940 --> 01:52:43.940]  Been up here for six months.
[01:52:43.940 --> 01:52:46.940]  So it's blue Ted.
[01:52:46.940 --> 01:52:49.940]  Anyway.
[01:52:49.940 --> 01:52:50.940]  Wow.
[01:52:50.940 --> 01:52:55.940]  Really good topic that you're trying to put together with the property taxes.
[01:52:55.940 --> 01:52:59.940]  And I have somebody should call in and listen.
[01:52:59.940 --> 01:53:03.940]  I caught the tail end of Tina's call tonight.
[01:53:03.940 --> 01:53:11.940]  And yes, you know, I am going to be filing as part of my lawsuit.
[01:53:11.940 --> 01:53:13.940]  The Rico.
[01:53:13.940 --> 01:53:20.940]  So and it's going to be because it is a custom and a practice.
[01:53:20.940 --> 01:53:29.940]  To do what they some of the things they did to me was just because I was exposing.
[01:53:29.940 --> 01:53:37.940]  The inner workings of the county government and their relations with the superior court of Santa Clara County.
[01:53:37.940 --> 01:53:40.940]  So I agree with you on that.
[01:53:40.940 --> 01:53:44.940]  And and.
[01:53:44.940 --> 01:53:48.940]  You know, that's that's pretty much all I really had.
[01:53:48.940 --> 01:54:00.940]  I was going to kid you when I called in last week, because two Mondays ago, I called into the show and I got called in the middle of the show on Monday night.
[01:54:00.940 --> 01:54:04.940]  Some guy was driving.
[01:54:04.940 --> 01:54:05.940]  What's his name?
[01:54:05.940 --> 01:54:10.940]  Crazy.
[01:54:10.940 --> 01:54:19.940]  No, I think his name starts with an R.
[01:54:19.940 --> 01:54:28.940]  Oh, and and you were telling him to turn that hillbilly music off.
[01:54:28.940 --> 01:54:37.940]  Anyway, if you, Randy, you called in to I can't remember his name right now and I don't have you up on my computer screen.
[01:54:37.940 --> 01:54:43.940]  The Monday show on on traffic ticket.
[01:54:43.940 --> 01:54:48.940]  And when I was on Eddie Craig show, Eddie Craig.
[01:54:48.940 --> 01:54:51.940]  OK, that was two Mondays ago.
[01:54:51.940 --> 01:54:58.940]  And then Eddie replayed that show this this past Monday.
[01:54:58.940 --> 01:55:07.940]  So anyway, if you missed that, you might want to go check it out.
[01:55:07.940 --> 01:55:17.940]  Thanks. Yeah, I like doing that with Eddie. We we kind of hammer one another back and forth.
[01:55:17.940 --> 01:55:30.940]  But yeah, maybe on my situation right now, I'm still I put in the claim to the county and now they have time to respond.
[01:55:30.940 --> 01:55:36.940]  If they don't respond after two months, I think I can go ahead and file my lawsuit.
[01:55:36.940 --> 01:55:42.940]  And honestly, I'm behind because I haven't been studying the.
[01:55:42.940 --> 01:55:48.940]  Jurisdictionary. I'm only about a third of the way through jurisdictionary.
[01:55:48.940 --> 01:55:52.940]  And I want to remind you and I can send you another email, too.
[01:55:52.940 --> 01:55:56.940]  I would like to see your Rico lawsuit. I think you have two lawsuits out there.
[01:55:56.940 --> 01:56:02.940]  I'd like to look and read them over. Send me an email.
[01:56:02.940 --> 01:56:08.940]  I've got some work to do to it either tonight or early in the morning to have it finished, ready to file.
[01:56:08.940 --> 01:56:15.940]  We're just doing the tweaking of the tiny details. I will send you the latest version.
[01:56:15.940 --> 01:56:22.940]  OK, because it's going to be used as a reference.
[01:56:22.940 --> 01:56:31.940]  Well, this one won't be so great for you because it's very deep into the details of Texas law.
[01:56:31.940 --> 01:56:38.940]  Well, it still may give me some causes of action. It may show me the layout.
[01:56:38.940 --> 01:56:48.940]  Yeah, California law is going to be very similar in that this thing of examining trials is about examining trials.
[01:56:48.940 --> 01:56:56.940]  They are critical to the system, and I'm claiming that because they took out the examining trial,
[01:56:56.940 --> 01:57:05.940]  it eliminated a major check and balance and let the whole system become destabilized.
[01:57:05.940 --> 01:57:07.940]  That part you might find interesting.
[01:57:07.940 --> 01:57:13.940]  I'm talking about the lawsuit, your $500 million lawsuit.
[01:57:13.940 --> 01:57:16.940]  That's it. OK.
[01:57:16.940 --> 01:57:24.940]  Yeah, I'm saying that because they don't take them to a magistrate, the policeman now, he doesn't have to explain why he arrested somebody.
[01:57:24.940 --> 01:57:29.940]  He can arrest him for anything he wants to. It never gets questioned.
[01:57:29.940 --> 01:57:36.940]  If he has to call in a magistrate immediately, and the law requires it in California, same as here.
[01:57:36.940 --> 01:57:43.940]  If he has to call and explain himself, he's not going to do stupid stuff just because he's in a bad mood that day.
[01:57:43.940 --> 01:57:50.940]  You know, we all need checks on our own behavior.
[01:57:50.940 --> 01:57:57.940]  We need the law to keep us from being careless and stupid and hurting ourselves and other people.
[01:57:57.940 --> 01:58:02.940]  We need the threat of prosecution. They need the same thing.
[01:58:02.940 --> 01:58:15.940]  They need to run the risk of having this magistrate chew them out for acting ignorant to kind of keep them from letting themselves get out of hand.
[01:58:15.940 --> 01:58:21.940]  And we lost that. It has caused this mass incarceration issue in Texas.
[01:58:21.940 --> 01:58:28.940]  It's cost in Texas counties $11.9 billion a year.
[01:58:28.940 --> 01:58:33.940]  So $500 million is jump change relative to how much we'll save them.
[01:58:33.940 --> 01:58:40.940]  OK. Thank you, Ted. We'll be back tomorrow night for our four hour info marathon.
[01:58:40.940 --> 01:58:45.940]  Thank you all for listening, and good night.
[01:59:11.940 --> 01:59:20.940]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.940 --> 01:59:29.940]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.940 --> 01:59:32.940]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.940 --> 01:59:40.940]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.940 --> 01:59:49.940]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.940 --> 02:00:01.940]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com