[00:00.000 --> 00:05.760]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.760 --> 00:09.420]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.420 --> 00:10.920]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.920 --> 00:14.820]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.820 --> 00:16.920]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.920 --> 00:18.520]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.520 --> 00:22.120]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.120 --> 00:26.880]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.880 --> 00:32.040]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.040 --> 00:33.040]  Privacy.
[00:33.040 --> 00:34.640]  It's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.640 --> 00:38.920]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[00:38.920 --> 00:42.480]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.480 --> 00:44.920]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:44.920 --> 00:46.520]  Spar.
[00:46.520 --> 00:47.760]  It's what fighters do.
[00:47.760 --> 00:51.240]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:51.240 --> 00:54.440]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.440 --> 01:01.560]  Spar with an extra P. S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly,
[01:01.560 --> 01:02.920]  and R for religion.
[01:02.920 --> 01:07.040]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:07.040 --> 01:08.500]  assembly, and religion.
[01:08.500 --> 01:10.840]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.840 --> 01:14.560]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.560 --> 01:18.080]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.080 --> 01:20.760]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.760 --> 01:22.720]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:22.720 --> 01:31.040]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.040 --> 01:34.720]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our Constitution.
[01:34.720 --> 01:38.160]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:38.160 --> 01:39.680]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:39.680 --> 01:43.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:43.560 --> 01:46.680]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:46.680 --> 01:48.280]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.280 --> 01:51.880]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.880 --> 01:56.640]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:56.640 --> 02:01.680]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.680 --> 02:04.400]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.400 --> 02:08.680]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[02:08.680 --> 02:12.240]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.240 --> 02:14.320]  Start over with Startpage.
[02:14.320 --> 02:20.160]  When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill
[02:20.160 --> 02:22.240]  of Rights in a big old bear hug.
[02:22.240 --> 02:26.720]  It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms
[02:26.720 --> 02:30.600]  that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[02:30.600 --> 02:31.600]  Get it?
[02:31.600 --> 02:32.600]  Two arms?
[02:32.600 --> 02:33.600]  Bear hug?
[02:33.600 --> 02:34.600]  Bear arms?
[02:34.600 --> 02:37.480]  The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well
[02:37.480 --> 02:38.720]  when he said,
[02:38.720 --> 02:43.680]  The right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government,
[02:43.680 --> 02:48.760]  one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically
[02:48.760 --> 02:50.400]  has proved to always be possible.
[02:50.400 --> 02:52.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[02:52.400 --> 03:19.280]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:22.400 --> 03:29.320]  Okay.
[03:29.320 --> 03:30.320]  We are back.
[03:30.320 --> 03:36.060]  Commander Kelton Bret Fountain, Root of Law Radio, and John, you asked us a hard question,
[03:36.060 --> 03:39.200]  so we brought in the heavy hitter.
[03:39.200 --> 03:40.200]  Eddie?
[03:40.200 --> 03:44.760]  Good evening, everybody.
[03:44.760 --> 03:53.000]  Tell us about how the Supreme has addressed the traffic, the right to travel traffic issue.
[03:53.000 --> 03:54.360]  Okay.
[03:54.360 --> 03:59.040]  First off, when you say right to travel, the Supreme Court has never addressed the right
[03:59.040 --> 04:02.480]  to travel in relation to domestic movement.
[04:02.480 --> 04:07.760]  It's only been in relation to overseas travel, okay?
[04:07.760 --> 04:13.720]  The right to locomotion is how they have addressed travel between the states, okay?
[04:13.720 --> 04:21.080]  It's the right of liberty, the right of locomotion, but they've never addressed that subject directly.
[04:21.080 --> 04:26.680]  They've always addressed it indirectly in relation to another specific case they were
[04:26.680 --> 04:34.840]  hearing, so they've never directly ruled on the people's right to use the roads without
[04:34.840 --> 04:37.040]  interference from the state.
[04:37.040 --> 04:40.840]  If they had, this would already be a moot point.
[04:40.840 --> 04:44.960]  What they have, because the way the state courts are getting away with misleading people
[04:44.960 --> 04:52.160]  is they keep saying that when you try to cite the cases that exist, that point out through
[04:52.160 --> 04:56.880]  inference that the people have the absolute right to use the roads for their own private
[04:56.880 --> 05:03.560]  business and pleasure, the state courts are calling that part of the opinion dicta, and
[05:03.560 --> 05:08.980]  therefore, since it is not directly related to the issues of the case as far as the decisions
[05:08.980 --> 05:13.720]  in the case, they don't give it any weight whatsoever.
[05:13.720 --> 05:17.720]  That's how they've avoided dealing with this for so long.
[05:17.720 --> 05:25.620]  The problem is that they are using court opinions that cite dicta from other cases as the basis
[05:25.620 --> 05:28.280]  of the opinion they're writing.
[05:28.280 --> 05:35.640]  So it's a hypocritical method at best the way they do it, but it only works when they
[05:35.640 --> 05:39.640]  do it in their favor, not in ours.
[05:39.640 --> 05:43.640]  This is why I had to go through the Texas transportation code and the Texas administrative
[05:43.640 --> 05:48.920]  code and the government code and the penal code and tear them apart piece by piece to
[05:48.920 --> 05:55.240]  find all of the individual puzzle pieces that here in Texas, I can prove using nothing but
[05:55.240 --> 06:01.600]  our own state law that that license does not apply to the people in general, nor does any
[06:01.600 --> 06:04.480]  other part of the transportation code.
[06:04.480 --> 06:07.520]  Herein lies the difference.
[06:07.520 --> 06:11.160]  Oh, boy.
[06:11.160 --> 06:16.600]  So can you translate that down into simple English that I can understand?
[06:16.600 --> 06:19.960]  Well, how much simpler would you like it?
[06:19.960 --> 06:25.360]  The Supreme Court does not have a specific opinion you can reference for what you're
[06:25.360 --> 06:28.060]  asking.
[06:28.060 --> 06:33.000]  This is why you have to use your state law to prove that the state courts are the ones
[06:33.000 --> 06:39.840]  not complying with the law, not the individual getting the ticket.
[06:39.840 --> 06:48.840]  So what the translation and they require you to have a license just for private travel.
[06:48.840 --> 06:57.120]  Again, John, what I'm trying to tell you is you have to show where your state law limits
[06:57.120 --> 07:03.440]  the purpose of that license to commercial activity only, which I can do here in the
[07:03.440 --> 07:08.280]  state of Texas using just the administrative code, the transportation code, the government
[07:08.280 --> 07:11.760]  code and the penal code in the state constitution.
[07:11.760 --> 07:14.400]  I can prove it irrefutably.
[07:14.400 --> 07:16.060]  Okay.
[07:16.060 --> 07:21.240]  But there is no court case that's on point with the arguments I make to prove it because
[07:21.240 --> 07:26.800]  it's never been addressed in its totality, the way that you have to do in order to prove
[07:26.800 --> 07:28.600]  it.
[07:28.600 --> 07:34.360]  So you're asking for a Supreme Court case that says we have the right to travel between
[07:34.360 --> 07:36.560]  the states using a car.
[07:36.560 --> 07:37.560]  Okay.
[07:37.560 --> 07:44.840]  There is no such case, not that that was the specific issue of the case.
[07:44.840 --> 07:46.960]  Okay.
[07:46.960 --> 07:54.120]  It was discussed in relation to the issues in some of the cases, but it was not the issue
[07:54.120 --> 07:59.160]  in the case that the, that the citation you're thinking of or the multiple citations you
[07:59.160 --> 08:02.560]  may be thinking of comes from.
[08:02.560 --> 08:08.200]  And there are a lot of, okay, there's lots of cases that discuss the people's right to
[08:08.200 --> 08:09.200]  travel.
[08:09.200 --> 08:13.520]  Hell, we've got a Texas Supreme Court case right here in Texas.
[08:13.520 --> 08:20.640]  The Patel case that specifically talks about driver's licenses being related to a business
[08:20.640 --> 08:28.520]  or profession and nothing else, because that is the entire issue of the Patel case.
[08:28.520 --> 08:35.600]  However, it's an issue dealing with eyebrow tweezers, people who actually pluck eyebrow
[08:35.600 --> 08:41.360]  hairs that stick up and out and the state licensing board wanting them to have the same
[08:41.360 --> 08:46.280]  license a full blown cosmetologist has, is that a thing?
[08:46.280 --> 08:52.440]  It's a thing and they actually took that to court and fought it and the Supreme Court
[08:52.440 --> 08:57.680]  ruled in their favor saying it's idiotic to say somebody that basically rubs two pieces
[08:57.680 --> 09:03.040]  of thread twisted together over somebody's eyebrows has to have the same licensing as
[09:03.040 --> 09:05.640]  a full blown cosmetologist.
[09:05.640 --> 09:09.000]  It's stupid and they're right.
[09:09.000 --> 09:10.160]  Okay.
[09:10.160 --> 09:15.120]  But because that's the specific issue in the case, the discussion of the driver's license,
[09:15.120 --> 09:20.400]  even in the Patel case cannot be cited as authoritative because the courts will call
[09:20.400 --> 09:28.740]  it dicta and if you don't know what dicta is, D-I-C-T-A, you need to look it up so you
[09:28.740 --> 09:34.320]  understand the definition for yourself rather than me trying to explain it.
[09:34.320 --> 09:38.120]  So there is no case supporting what I just said.
[09:38.120 --> 09:43.960]  There is no case that is absolutely on point with what you've said that I have ever seen
[09:43.960 --> 09:45.760]  and I have looked.
[09:45.760 --> 09:51.520]  If there is one and you have it or anybody listening to this show has it, I would love
[09:51.520 --> 09:53.600]  to get a copy of it.
[09:53.600 --> 10:01.400]  But remember that all of the major cases that are being cited, the references are not the
[10:01.400 --> 10:05.760]  issues that are in that case.
[10:05.760 --> 10:07.840]  That is not the issue before the court.
[10:07.840 --> 10:13.800]  It is just talked about by the court in relation to the issues that are there for all the
[10:13.800 --> 10:18.920]  state courts refer to it as dicta and they will not consider it authoritative.
[10:18.920 --> 10:36.760]  Well I think I've got some cases related to that.
[10:36.760 --> 10:39.080]  Everybody's got cases related to it.
[10:39.080 --> 10:43.680]  The problem is they are not on point about it.
[10:43.680 --> 10:47.400]  The case is not about that issue.
[10:47.400 --> 10:48.400]  That's what I'd like to know.
[10:48.400 --> 10:54.640]  I'm going to get them, I'll either send them to you or call them on your show and I'd like
[10:54.640 --> 10:59.440]  you to tell me if they are on point and if they're off point then I want to know that.
[10:59.440 --> 11:01.440]  All you got to do is read them.
[11:01.440 --> 11:05.640]  It tells you at the very beginning of a case it gives you a summation of the issues in
[11:05.640 --> 11:06.640]  the case.
[11:06.640 --> 11:07.640]  Okay?
[11:07.640 --> 11:12.640]  If the issue is not the right of the people to use the public highways for their private
[11:12.640 --> 11:21.280]  business and pleasure without state interference, then it's not the issue of the case.
[11:21.280 --> 11:26.160]  Well I'm going to call you with them anyway because I prefer you to email me because I'm
[11:26.160 --> 11:31.520]  going to be talking about cases everybody's seen but nobody knows how to use.
[11:31.520 --> 11:32.520]  Right.
[11:32.520 --> 11:33.520]  Okay.
[11:33.520 --> 11:34.520]  Okay.
[11:34.520 --> 11:35.520]  Sounds good.
[11:35.520 --> 11:36.520]  Thank you.
[11:36.520 --> 11:37.520]  All right.
[11:37.520 --> 11:40.520]  You're welcome.
[11:40.520 --> 11:43.120]  Okay.
[11:43.120 --> 11:49.960]  What was that case about that says there's no such thing known to Texas law as a driver
[11:49.960 --> 11:50.960]  license.
[11:50.960 --> 11:51.960]  Yeah.
[11:51.960 --> 11:58.240]  There's several Texas cases that way, but that was prior to the rewrite of the statutes
[11:58.240 --> 12:01.560]  that added the term driver's license to the death.
[12:01.560 --> 12:02.560]  Okay.
[12:02.560 --> 12:07.320]  Prior to that, the only license is listed in the Texas transportation code where operators,
[12:07.320 --> 12:09.720]  commercial operators and chauffeurs licenses.
[12:09.720 --> 12:17.120]  There were no, they can, they compile them into a single reference called a driver's
[12:17.120 --> 12:20.520]  license when they read codified the statutes.
[12:20.520 --> 12:25.840]  And when they did that, they got rid of the old references to the individual licenses
[12:25.840 --> 12:31.360]  and put them all under the same umbrella of driver's license.
[12:31.360 --> 12:37.440]  Even chapter five 22 of the Texas transportation code, which is specifically titled commercial
[12:37.440 --> 12:45.640]  drivers licenses, references chapter five 21 drivers licenses as the basis for everything
[12:45.640 --> 12:53.120]  it says.
[12:53.120 --> 12:56.280]  So while there's law, it's old law.
[12:56.280 --> 13:03.480]  Well, that's what I keep saying about relying upon prior precedent without checking whether
[13:03.480 --> 13:04.920]  or not the law has changed.
[13:04.920 --> 13:09.680]  It's that precedent was established when you read a case, like for instance, we're taking
[13:09.680 --> 13:15.560]  apart a case in my Thursday night class right now called Riggins v state.
[13:15.560 --> 13:20.840]  And in that the court of appeals that's hearing this, that wrote this opinion is just ripping
[13:20.840 --> 13:25.520]  this guy Riggins a new one with all of his arguments about what the transportation code
[13:25.520 --> 13:27.200]  does and doesn't do.
[13:27.200 --> 13:32.880]  Now the court got every issue they put out there completely dead wrong.
[13:32.880 --> 13:37.160]  Everything they wrote in that opinion was dead wrong if you read all of the statute
[13:37.160 --> 13:39.680]  that relates to what they're talking about.
[13:39.680 --> 13:45.780]  But just like they always do, they cherry picked specific pieces and relied on that.
[13:45.780 --> 13:53.320]  But they cite a case called ex parte Morales, which is from 1899.
[13:53.320 --> 14:00.560]  And what it says about the requirement of an information is dead wrong because even
[14:00.560 --> 14:06.200]  in 1899, the Texas constitution still said that an indictment or information is what
[14:06.200 --> 14:09.680]  gave the court jurisdiction, not a complaint.
[14:09.680 --> 14:16.080]  And yet the Morales case was decided saying that it would be against the law to, to require
[14:16.080 --> 14:21.640]  an information since it only requires the complaint in these misdemeanor cases.
[14:21.640 --> 14:31.240]  But I mean, they misquoted the law in that finding in that case.
[14:31.240 --> 14:36.800]  And then they use, they didn't misquote it.
[14:36.800 --> 14:42.360]  What they did and what they're still doing is they are tempting to rewrite the Texas
[14:42.360 --> 14:47.200]  constitution using the rules of criminal procedure.
[14:47.200 --> 14:51.800]  They write a procedure that says you only have to file a complaint which flies in the
[14:51.800 --> 14:58.720]  face of article five, section 12, or yeah, section 12 B, which says the indictment or
[14:58.720 --> 15:12.720]  information is what invests the court with jurisdiction, not a complaint.
[15:12.720 --> 15:17.120]  So there's lots of issues with the way the Texas courts and most other States and their
[15:17.120 --> 15:21.480]  courts are handling all of these various issues.
[15:21.480 --> 15:26.440]  They are misleading the public and they're doing it intentionally because God forbid
[15:26.440 --> 15:30.080]  that these people are getting paid that what they're getting paid with the degrees they're
[15:30.080 --> 15:31.360]  supposed to have.
[15:31.360 --> 15:34.000]  And they're still this freaking stupid.
[15:34.000 --> 15:44.160]  Well, when I look at their practice as opposed to the law, I can't imagine how they got to
[15:44.160 --> 15:45.160]  this point.
[15:45.160 --> 15:47.400]  Oh, I can.
[15:47.400 --> 15:51.200]  And it's not the magic theories that all the patron that's keep wanting to come up with
[15:51.200 --> 15:52.200]  it.
[15:52.200 --> 15:56.280]  It ain't got nothing to do with the Pope, the queen of England, the postmaster general,
[15:56.280 --> 15:58.600]  the banks are accepted for value.
[15:58.600 --> 15:59.600]  It is.
[15:59.600 --> 16:00.600]  So be so.
[16:00.600 --> 16:04.800]  It's a very, very simple thing.
[16:04.800 --> 16:07.920]  It's very, very simple.
[16:07.920 --> 16:15.440]  It comes in three parts, which actually winds up being one of these same three parts, ignorance,
[16:15.440 --> 16:18.040]  incompetence, corruption.
[16:18.040 --> 16:23.440]  And when you put all those together and you analyze them, you will find out that incompetence
[16:23.440 --> 16:29.640]  and ignorance actually fit well within corruption because they're either willfully ignorant
[16:29.640 --> 16:39.640]  and refuse to learn or, well, I hear the music, so I'll wait.
[16:39.640 --> 16:46.000]  OK, we're getting some quiet spots here.
[16:46.000 --> 16:47.840]  Well, hey, I hear the music.
[16:47.840 --> 16:52.320]  No, no, I was just hoping it wasn't our system quietening us out.
[16:52.320 --> 16:53.320]  OK, good.
[16:53.320 --> 16:54.320]  Hang on.
[16:54.320 --> 17:00.160]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.160 --> 17:04.840]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[17:04.840 --> 17:08.960]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[17:08.960 --> 17:13.240]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[17:13.240 --> 17:14.240]  can win too.
[17:14.240 --> 17:19.080]  You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[17:19.080 --> 17:20.760]  civil rights statutes.
[17:20.760 --> 17:25.720]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone
[17:25.720 --> 17:30.360]  calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables
[17:30.360 --> 17:33.680]  on them and make them pay you to go away.
[17:33.680 --> 17:38.800]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[17:38.800 --> 17:40.960]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[17:40.960 --> 17:46.480]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[17:46.480 --> 17:49.480]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[17:49.480 --> 17:59.040]  It's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[17:59.040 --> 18:00.040]  now.
[18:00.040 --> 18:04.640]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[18:04.640 --> 18:08.160]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever
[18:08.160 --> 18:11.960]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:11.960 --> 18:15.560]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[18:15.560 --> 18:19.600]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:19.600 --> 18:23.440]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[18:23.440 --> 18:24.800]  our rights through due process.
[18:24.800 --> 18:28.800]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[18:28.800 --> 18:32.560]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[18:32.560 --> 18:34.960]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:34.960 --> 18:38.960]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[18:38.960 --> 18:40.280]  ordering your copy today.
[18:40.280 --> 18:43.560]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[18:43.560 --> 18:48.080]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[18:48.080 --> 18:50.400]  documents and other useful resource material.
[18:50.400 --> 18:54.360]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[18:54.360 --> 19:09.280]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[19:09.280 --> 19:18.680]  Well, don't let nothing get to you, only the father can deliver you, so don't let bad
[19:18.680 --> 19:48.320]  people hurt you and test it and get behind you, Norman, my friend, and all of your children.
[19:48.680 --> 20:11.320]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to John
[20:11.320 --> 20:13.320]  in New York.
[20:13.320 --> 20:16.160]  I'm having a little trouble finding my mouse.
[20:16.160 --> 20:18.840]  There you go, John.
[20:18.840 --> 20:21.720]  What else do you have for us?
[20:21.720 --> 20:25.920]  So as it stands, you need a driver's license in New York State.
[20:25.920 --> 20:28.480]  No, I didn't say that.
[20:28.480 --> 20:33.920]  I said you need to check the statutes until you can solve the pieces of the puzzle needed
[20:33.920 --> 20:34.920]  to prove otherwise.
[20:34.920 --> 20:41.240]  You can't rely on a United States Supreme Court opinion to tell you what your state
[20:41.240 --> 20:42.240]  law says.
[20:42.240 --> 20:43.240]  Can't do it.
[20:43.240 --> 20:44.240]  Okay.
[20:44.240 --> 20:45.240]  Okay, got it.
[20:45.240 --> 20:48.680]  And you have to figure that out yourself.
[20:48.680 --> 20:54.320]  All right.
[20:54.320 --> 21:02.960]  Then you've answered that pretty well, very well.
[21:02.960 --> 21:10.480]  I called, as everybody told me to do, I called Randy and Brett, and I think even you, I think
[21:10.480 --> 21:18.280]  you told me, I called the local court clerk's office today, finally got through, and like
[21:18.280 --> 21:25.560]  you and Randy had said, and Eddie, to find out who wrote the local code enforcement,
[21:25.560 --> 21:31.360]  the grass police, you know, the grass police, who wrote the local code enforcement rules
[21:31.360 --> 21:33.640]  and regulations.
[21:33.640 --> 21:35.320]  And they had no idea.
[21:35.320 --> 21:36.800]  Well, duh.
[21:36.800 --> 21:43.720]  Now, these people have civil service jobs, they take exams, they make 30, 40, 50, $60,000
[21:43.720 --> 21:47.640]  a year, and they don't know their elbow from a hole in the ground.
[21:47.640 --> 21:53.400]  Well, I can tell you who enacted it, almost certainly without any guesswork whatsoever.
[21:53.400 --> 21:55.960]  Okay, please.
[21:55.960 --> 21:59.680]  City council.
[21:59.680 --> 22:06.760]  And they told me at the code enforcement office, they told me at the code enforcement office,
[22:06.760 --> 22:15.520]  they told me that they thought it was state laws, state legislation, and that they gave
[22:15.520 --> 22:23.680]  the local people in the code enforcement office the right to make laws or, you know, your
[22:23.680 --> 22:24.680]  mentality.
[22:24.680 --> 22:25.680]  Oh, John.
[22:25.680 --> 22:32.720]  John, John, I have this great brief on this subject, and it's really, a really, really
[22:32.720 --> 22:36.800]  good brief that I pledge your rights for, Maddie.
[22:36.800 --> 22:40.240]  I thought you were going to say you have this great bridge to sell.
[22:40.240 --> 22:49.080]  Well, if he's believing the bureaucratic office he's talking about, then he could probably
[22:49.080 --> 22:50.080]  buy the bridge.
[22:50.080 --> 22:56.320]  John, does your state constitution give anyone but your state legislature the authority to
[22:56.320 --> 22:57.320]  make law?
[22:57.320 --> 23:04.640]  It has always been my observation and my knowledge that no, buddy, but the late state legislature
[23:04.640 --> 23:06.440]  can make law.
[23:06.440 --> 23:10.080]  Does your state constitution expressly say that?
[23:10.080 --> 23:12.960]  No, I don't know.
[23:12.960 --> 23:13.960]  So I have to-
[23:13.960 --> 23:17.920]  Well, then what you think and what you believe is irrelevant until you've read.
[23:17.920 --> 23:26.040]  Well, when you're speaking to the state constitution, does the constitution grant anyone else specific
[23:26.040 --> 23:28.080]  authority?
[23:28.080 --> 23:33.400]  I don't think so, but I'm going to look it up.
[23:33.400 --> 23:34.400]  Okay.
[23:34.400 --> 23:41.060]  They can't write law unless they're specifically authorized by the constitution to write law,
[23:41.060 --> 23:44.880]  and that's why they call it ordinances.
[23:44.880 --> 23:45.880]  You need to do this.
[23:45.880 --> 23:48.320]  This is your argument, Eddie.
[23:48.320 --> 23:49.320]  Yeah.
[23:49.320 --> 23:59.320]  I mean, on my legal blog, there's probably at least six or seven articles dealing with
[23:59.320 --> 24:05.480]  ordinances and how to argue about them based upon what your state constitution says.
[24:05.480 --> 24:11.520]  If your state constitution does not explicitly give municipalities and counties in New York
[24:11.520 --> 24:19.960]  State the power to create local law rather than the legislature, then they don't have
[24:19.960 --> 24:20.960]  it.
[24:20.960 --> 24:26.720]  If it specifically says that the power to create law is vested in the legislature defined
[24:26.720 --> 24:33.440]  as the Senate and whatever house of representatives like it is here in Texas, and together they're
[24:33.440 --> 24:38.040]  called the legislature of the state of New York or the legislature of the state of Texas
[24:38.040 --> 24:43.600]  as in our case, they're the only one that power is given to.
[24:43.600 --> 24:46.720]  Article three, section one, Texas constitution.
[24:46.720 --> 24:52.640]  And then everything else from article three, section 29 through 39 is all about the process
[24:52.640 --> 24:55.120]  for how those laws must be made.
[24:55.120 --> 25:02.040]  Not a single one of which a municipality or a county commissioner's court can comply with.
[25:02.040 --> 25:06.920]  Hence, they don't have the power to make law and they can't comply with any of the requirements
[25:06.920 --> 25:09.120]  for an actual law to be enacted.
[25:09.120 --> 25:12.280]  Therefore, they can't freaking do it.
[25:12.280 --> 25:14.960]  There is no discussion to be had about that.
[25:14.960 --> 25:19.120]  There's no debate that can be had about that.
[25:19.120 --> 25:24.440]  So again, what am I going to look up to see if my constitution in my state-
[25:24.440 --> 25:27.960]  Who does it give the power to to make law?
[25:27.960 --> 25:28.960]  Right.
[25:28.960 --> 25:32.160]  Now, it's my understanding and I will look it up, but-
[25:32.160 --> 25:33.520]  Wait, wait, wait, John.
[25:33.520 --> 25:36.360]  You've already said you haven't read it.
[25:36.360 --> 25:41.040]  Therefore, your understanding is irrelevant because you're basing it on what you think
[25:41.040 --> 25:44.200]  or what you believe and not what you know.
[25:44.200 --> 25:45.200]  Hold on.
[25:45.200 --> 25:46.360]  Go read it.
[25:46.360 --> 25:56.040]  You're going to laugh when I say this, but some lawyers that I have asked this same question
[25:56.040 --> 26:02.800]  told me that the state legislature is the only power in the state that can write law.
[26:02.800 --> 26:08.520]  Well, that's probably because that is what your state constitution says.
[26:08.520 --> 26:09.720]  I heard it from lawyers.
[26:09.720 --> 26:11.320]  It must be true.
[26:11.320 --> 26:14.240]  No, don't believe that either.
[26:14.240 --> 26:18.960]  Be able to prove it yourself whether a law you're agreed with you or not is irrelevant.
[26:18.960 --> 26:21.960]  Go find it.
[26:21.960 --> 26:23.560]  I'm going to look it up.
[26:23.560 --> 26:24.560]  All right.
[26:24.560 --> 26:30.000]  In the constitution, all right, who makes the laws in the state of New York?
[26:30.000 --> 26:31.000]  All right.
[26:31.000 --> 26:36.040]  Now, why was I not surprised that the clerk's office didn't know what they were talking
[26:36.040 --> 26:38.280]  about or what I was talking about?
[26:38.280 --> 26:39.640]  Why am I not surprised?
[26:39.640 --> 26:45.880]  Well, anyway, why am I not surprised that the code enforcement office told me that the
[26:45.880 --> 26:52.520]  state of New York has written their grass laws and they're more stringent.
[26:52.520 --> 26:59.840]  They're more strict in the state law about grass height than the local municipalities.
[26:59.840 --> 27:03.000]  I think the state says 12 inches.
[27:03.000 --> 27:04.000]  They told me this.
[27:04.000 --> 27:05.000]  They told me this.
[27:05.000 --> 27:06.000]  It must be true.
[27:06.000 --> 27:11.080]  The code enforcement office said that the state has said 12 inches is the maximum height
[27:11.080 --> 27:13.040]  for grass in the state.
[27:13.040 --> 27:16.680]  And then the local municipality I live in is six inches.
[27:16.680 --> 27:20.600]  All right, John.
[27:20.600 --> 27:24.600]  Article three, section one of the New York state constitution.
[27:24.600 --> 27:30.120]  The legislative power of this state shall be vested in the Senate and assembly doesn't
[27:30.120 --> 27:35.880]  say squat about municipalities or counties.
[27:35.880 --> 27:42.680]  And that's article three, section, section one, article three, section one.
[27:42.680 --> 27:46.200]  So it limits it to the state legislature.
[27:46.200 --> 27:51.880]  Unless there's a specific exception to be found somewhere else in this relative to counties
[27:51.880 --> 27:55.720]  or municipalities, yes.
[27:55.720 --> 28:02.120]  So I can quote section three, article, article one, section three where I got it backwards
[28:02.120 --> 28:08.280]  that will article three, section one, it's the same as it is here in Texas, article three,
[28:08.280 --> 28:09.280]  section one.
[28:09.280 --> 28:15.040]  However, it's not going to be the only relevant article to supporting your point.
[28:15.040 --> 28:20.520]  Like I said, you've got article three, section one here in Texas about who has the power
[28:20.520 --> 28:25.880]  and then you've got article three, sections 29 through 39 that stipulate how that power
[28:25.880 --> 28:31.960]  must be used to create that law, all the process and procedures they must follow.
[28:31.960 --> 28:36.360]  So somewhere else in this article three, I guarantee you, you're going to find the same
[28:36.360 --> 28:40.880]  type of sections or something similar in the New York state constitution.
[28:40.880 --> 28:45.160]  So you need to read them and study them and say, okay, if this hasn't happened, it's not
[28:45.160 --> 28:46.160]  a law.
[28:46.160 --> 28:50.960]  If this hasn't happened, it's not a law because these are all requirements the state constitution
[28:50.960 --> 28:54.880]  sets forth for it to be an actual law binding upon the public.
[28:54.880 --> 28:55.880]  Okay.
[28:55.880 --> 29:02.960]  So read the whole section three, just read the whole section, the whole article three.
[29:02.960 --> 29:04.480]  I mean the whole article three.
[29:04.480 --> 29:05.480]  Yeah.
[29:05.480 --> 29:11.680]  And then you look at any part of the, your constitution that deals with municipalities
[29:11.680 --> 29:16.360]  and see if there are any exceptions in that part of the constitution for municipalities
[29:16.360 --> 29:18.520]  to make certain kinds of laws.
[29:18.520 --> 29:22.680]  Then you look up counties and see if it's got a section for that, that does the same
[29:22.680 --> 29:23.860]  thing for them.
[29:23.860 --> 29:29.520]  If those two things do not exist, then all the legislative power is only in the state
[29:29.520 --> 29:31.280]  legislature and nowhere else.
[29:31.280 --> 29:33.280]  And they cannot redelegate.
[29:33.280 --> 29:38.360]  And there's something you need to pay attention to, John.
[29:38.360 --> 29:44.220]  They call them ordinances, the city and the county, and they don't call them ordinances
[29:44.220 --> 29:46.880]  by mistake.
[29:46.880 --> 29:51.120]  They call them ordinances because they are ordinances and not laws.
[29:51.120 --> 29:52.120]  That's right.
[29:52.120 --> 29:53.120]  They're not law.
[29:53.120 --> 29:54.120]  Exactly.
[29:54.120 --> 29:55.120]  Okay.
[29:55.120 --> 29:56.120]  Got it.
[29:56.120 --> 29:57.120]  Thank you.
[29:57.120 --> 30:01.280]  Thank you very much.
[30:01.280 --> 30:05.680]  Everyone knows that walking is great exercise, but you might not know that the way you walk
[30:05.680 --> 30:08.480]  could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:08.480 --> 30:13.040]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back to tell you more about walking prognostication
[30:13.040 --> 30:14.720]  in just a moment.
[30:14.720 --> 30:16.320]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.320 --> 30:19.920]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:19.920 --> 30:24.680]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:24.680 --> 30:29.760]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:29.760 --> 30:32.440]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[30:32.440 --> 30:36.740]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:36.740 --> 30:40.280]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[30:40.280 --> 30:43.560]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:43.560 --> 30:47.980]  New research shows how fast you walk could predict how long you're going to live.
[30:47.980 --> 30:52.560]  The Journal of the American Medical Association reports that older adults who walk one meter
[30:52.560 --> 30:55.780]  per second or faster live longer than expected.
[30:55.780 --> 31:00.180]  In case you're wondering, one meter per second is about two and a quarter miles per hour.
[31:00.180 --> 31:05.320]  A senior's age, gender and walking speed were as good at predicting life expectancy as more
[31:05.320 --> 31:07.240]  traditional statistical measures.
[31:07.240 --> 31:10.520]  Generally speaking, faster walkers live longer.
[31:10.520 --> 31:13.040]  Measuring walking speed is quick and inexpensive.
[31:13.040 --> 31:16.880]  It only takes a stopwatch, some space to walk and a few minutes.
[31:16.880 --> 31:20.960]  Researchers say it could help doctors identify older patients who need special care.
[31:20.960 --> 31:22.960]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:22.960 --> 31:30.440]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.440 --> 31:31.440]  I lost my son.
[31:31.440 --> 31:32.440]  My nephew.
[31:32.440 --> 31:33.440]  My uncle.
[31:33.440 --> 31:34.440]  My son.
[31:34.440 --> 31:35.440]  On September 11th, 2001.
[31:35.440 --> 31:38.720]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[31:38.720 --> 31:42.800]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:42.800 --> 31:46.720]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[31:46.720 --> 31:51.520]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more
[31:51.520 --> 31:52.520]  to the story.
[31:52.520 --> 31:53.520]  Injustice to my son.
[31:53.520 --> 31:54.520]  My uncle.
[31:54.520 --> 31:55.520]  My nephew.
[31:55.520 --> 31:56.520]  My son.
[31:56.520 --> 31:57.520]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[31:57.520 --> 31:58.520]  Why it fell.
[31:58.520 --> 31:59.520]  Why it matters.
[31:59.520 --> 32:01.760]  And what you can do.
[32:01.760 --> 32:06.160]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His
[32:06.160 --> 32:07.160]  Word?
[32:07.160 --> 32:12.280]  Then tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture
[32:12.280 --> 32:18.720]  Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy 2.15.
[32:18.720 --> 32:23.200]  Be ready to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly
[32:23.200 --> 32:25.600]  dividing the word of truth.
[32:25.600 --> 32:29.600]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse
[32:29.600 --> 32:32.920]  by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[32:32.920 --> 32:37.560]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[32:37.560 --> 32:39.920]  and Christian character development.
[32:39.920 --> 32:44.440]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:44.440 --> 32:48.760]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[32:48.760 --> 32:51.040]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[32:51.040 --> 32:57.680]  So tune in to Scripture Talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[32:57.680 --> 33:02.800]  motivate your studies of the Scriptures.
[33:02.800 --> 33:23.800]  And free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:33.800 --> 33:52.800]  I won't, I won't, I won't let you pull the wool over my eyes, I simply must refuse your
[33:52.800 --> 34:03.800]  nose, also come in light, it seems you like the fat, but please take some words to the
[34:03.800 --> 34:11.800]  wise, please stop trying to pull the wool over my eyes.
[34:11.800 --> 34:19.400]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ru's Law Radio, and we're going to a first
[34:19.400 --> 34:26.640]  time caller, Shane I see you there, we'll get to you, so don't go away, if you are from
[34:26.640 --> 34:34.800]  East Tennessee, give us a first name and talk to us.
[34:34.800 --> 34:38.640]  Hey y'all, how y'all doing?
[34:38.640 --> 34:51.680]  There we go, give us a first name, you don't even have to be a real one.
[34:51.680 --> 34:52.680]  Are you there?
[34:52.680 --> 34:55.680]  Yeah, I'm here.
[34:55.680 --> 34:59.680]  Okay, give us a first name and ask us a question.
[34:59.680 --> 35:01.680]  Hey, how y'all doing?
[35:01.680 --> 35:04.680]  This is old Mike.
[35:04.680 --> 35:07.680]  Can you say that again?
[35:07.680 --> 35:09.680]  This is Mike.
[35:09.680 --> 35:10.680]  Mike.
[35:10.680 --> 35:11.680]  Okay, Mike.
[35:11.680 --> 35:12.680]  Okay.
[35:12.680 --> 35:18.040]  I recognize this voice, how you doing Mr. Craig and Mr. Kelton and Mr. Fountain?
[35:18.040 --> 35:24.600]  Hey y'all, can somebody elaborate on that old boy out there in Houston, Texas?
[35:24.600 --> 35:30.400]  That tour, that government and that state official, the new behind, can somebody elaborate
[35:30.400 --> 35:31.400]  on that?
[35:31.400 --> 35:34.120]  You're talking about, you're talking about Rick Martin?
[35:34.120 --> 35:38.720]  Is it Steve Martin or Rick Martin?
[35:38.720 --> 35:43.040]  It's Rick Martin, I said Steve the other day and I was wrong, I talked to him about two
[35:43.040 --> 35:44.600]  hours today.
[35:44.600 --> 35:47.720]  Did you really?
[35:47.720 --> 35:52.040]  He's still after him, he's up in Michigan at the moment.
[35:52.040 --> 35:57.720]  Eddie, do you know Rick Martin?
[35:57.720 --> 36:01.520]  I know of him, I don't know him personally.
[36:01.520 --> 36:04.240]  I need you to hook, need to hook you up with him.
[36:04.240 --> 36:12.400]  He has, he's been taking on some pretty big issues and I kind of picked on him, I told
[36:12.400 --> 36:21.920]  somebody that this Dr. Martin, you know Dr. Martin is his cousin, the one who's going
[36:21.920 --> 36:29.920]  after the vaccine issue, that he didn't know how to write criminal complaints and I kind
[36:29.920 --> 36:37.320]  of heard his feelings, but I think I got that smoothed over today when I talked to him.
[36:37.320 --> 36:48.120]  So I will do, I will see if I can get an introduction for you to him, because he, he won a really
[36:48.120 --> 36:54.720]  big traffic case on right to drive or right to travel.
[36:54.720 --> 36:55.720]  Okay.
[36:55.720 --> 37:01.160]  Y'all were just talking about that right to travel and I think he was falsely arrested
[37:01.160 --> 37:05.160]  for not having a driver's license and they threw him in the clinker.
[37:05.160 --> 37:10.160]  Well, he came back and sued him, oh boy, as a United States district court and the jury
[37:10.160 --> 37:12.040]  come back awarding him damages.
[37:12.040 --> 37:16.320]  I mean, I mean, I think he got 60 grand.
[37:16.320 --> 37:22.240]  Yeah, I would love to see how he counts the argument on that simply because like I say,
[37:22.240 --> 37:26.920]  Texas law, if you actually read and study it, it's very, very clear that DPS is overstepping
[37:26.920 --> 37:30.400]  their bounds every chance they get.
[37:30.400 --> 37:37.320]  They are knowingly and willfully misinterpreting Texas law for revenue.
[37:37.320 --> 37:42.040]  Well, I have a question.
[37:42.040 --> 37:45.180]  I just had my license revoked.
[37:45.180 --> 37:48.240]  What does it take to revoke a license?
[37:48.240 --> 37:52.760]  A hearing for one thing, they can't just revoke it out of hand.
[37:52.760 --> 37:54.440]  They have to give you a hearing.
[37:54.440 --> 37:55.440]  Oh yeah.
[37:55.440 --> 37:59.800]  They got the state office of administrative hearings in Austin, right?
[37:59.800 --> 38:01.640]  They're supposed to have a hearing on that.
[38:01.640 --> 38:02.640]  Yep.
[38:02.640 --> 38:04.720]  It's mandatory by as a matter of law.
[38:04.720 --> 38:05.720]  It's mandatory.
[38:05.720 --> 38:06.720]  Yeah.
[38:06.720 --> 38:07.720]  Ready?
[38:07.720 --> 38:09.560]  Look up S O A H.
[38:09.560 --> 38:17.880]  I guess I shouldn't have told the judge to arrest his clerk.
[38:17.880 --> 38:20.000]  He's a little PO'd at me.
[38:20.000 --> 38:24.360]  That doesn't give him the right to revoke your license.
[38:24.360 --> 38:30.840]  I know, but I kind of put him over the edge.
[38:30.840 --> 38:34.040]  I have a way of doing that on occasion.
[38:34.040 --> 38:36.320]  Only when you're awake.
[38:36.320 --> 38:43.680]  That's true, but yeah, he was his clerk.
[38:43.680 --> 38:52.120]  I got a ticket and I went home and made up a subject matter jurisdiction challenge, went
[38:52.120 --> 38:53.720]  down and filed it.
[38:53.720 --> 38:55.600]  Well, she didn't know what to do.
[38:55.600 --> 39:04.240]  She didn't even know she could take filings, so I think I confused her so she didn't realize
[39:04.240 --> 39:07.720]  this was my first appearance.
[39:07.720 --> 39:15.920]  She marked down in her ledgers that I didn't appear and then notified the DPS and they
[39:15.920 --> 39:19.360]  wouldn't renew my license.
[39:19.360 --> 39:24.720]  So since I was harmed by them not renewing my license, I went down and filed criminal
[39:24.720 --> 39:34.040]  charges against the clerk with her, told her to give them to the judge, and then in a hearing
[39:34.040 --> 39:40.640]  I demanded that the judge issue a warrant against his clerk, and of course he refused.
[39:40.640 --> 39:44.440]  So now I am going to sue him personally.
[39:44.440 --> 39:47.920]  But I was too busy with other things and I didn't get to it yet.
[39:47.920 --> 39:55.240]  So the other day I got pulled over for speeding, they turned my hometown into a speed trap,
[39:55.240 --> 40:00.800]  and he notified me my license had been revoked.
[40:00.800 --> 40:08.160]  So if they have to have a hearing and they didn't, can they have a hearing in absentia?
[40:08.160 --> 40:10.200]  Not according to statute.
[40:10.200 --> 40:11.200]  Okay.
[40:11.200 --> 40:12.840]  Because what he did was-
[40:12.840 --> 40:17.720]  The question is, did they give you notice of the hearing and you failed to appear?
[40:17.720 --> 40:19.280]  No.
[40:19.280 --> 40:22.800]  What they did was set two hearing dates and didn't give me notice.
[40:22.800 --> 40:27.720]  See, they had been emailing me notice of the hearings.
[40:27.720 --> 40:34.040]  And after I jerked him around real hard, he set two hearings, didn't notify me, and then
[40:34.040 --> 40:41.240]  just ruled against me and sent me notices to pay him the bill.
[40:41.240 --> 40:49.040]  And I wasn't about to pay the bill, so now he's had my license revoked.
[40:49.040 --> 40:51.720]  So fights on.
[40:51.720 --> 40:57.480]  He still can't suspend your license for failure to pay the fines without a hearing.
[40:57.480 --> 40:58.480]  He can't do it.
[40:58.480 --> 41:04.520]  Well, I want to find out how that was done, what the mechanics are.
[41:04.520 --> 41:08.280]  And everybody who touched it gets sued.
[41:08.280 --> 41:17.320]  Well, if you can show, if you make the claim that they never served you, then he lacked
[41:17.320 --> 41:20.760]  jurisdiction to enter anything against you.
[41:20.760 --> 41:25.480]  He had no power without that service.
[41:25.480 --> 41:31.920]  And so even though the statute says the state does not have to prove service, that's BS.
[41:31.920 --> 41:37.600]  The Supreme Court says you have to prove the other party was notified.
[41:37.600 --> 41:40.160]  You have a case I can cite on that?
[41:40.160 --> 41:42.480]  Well, I don't have a specific one.
[41:42.480 --> 41:44.360]  I've got that folder in the seminar material.
[41:44.360 --> 41:46.600]  It's got all the case research in it.
[41:46.600 --> 41:51.360]  I think the folder is right to notice.
[41:51.360 --> 41:55.160]  And the court cases I've collected on that issue are all in there.
[41:55.160 --> 41:57.440]  Okay, I can look in that.
[41:57.440 --> 42:02.640]  See the difference between the way I do the stuff in law versus how an attorney does it.
[42:02.640 --> 42:06.280]  The attorneys memorize the cases.
[42:06.280 --> 42:07.360]  I don't.
[42:07.360 --> 42:14.400]  I memorize the statutes because the case law and the statutes don't always jive, especially
[42:14.400 --> 42:19.000]  if it's older case law and newer statutes.
[42:19.000 --> 42:24.620]  So just citing case law without reviewing the statute is stupid, not to mention a violation
[42:24.620 --> 42:31.160]  of law because you're now enforcing law that's no longer on the books, or that may have changed
[42:31.160 --> 42:33.640]  since that opinion was pinned down.
[42:33.640 --> 42:38.440]  Didn't you just come across that recently, Brett?
[42:38.440 --> 42:40.400]  Come across which?
[42:40.400 --> 42:43.200]  Where they're enforcing a law that had been revoked.
[42:43.200 --> 42:52.640]  Yeah, that's the 1999, I think, is when they got rid of Code of Criminal Procedure 45.01.
[42:52.640 --> 42:59.880]  It used to have some little loophole carved out for, I think it was parking tickets.
[42:59.880 --> 43:04.640]  I went and read the old law the way it used to be written before they repealed it.
[43:04.640 --> 43:09.500]  And it used to say something about the complaint is the charging instrument.
[43:09.500 --> 43:14.720]  And it was clearly intended for stuff that was like parking.
[43:14.720 --> 43:19.940]  It wasn't for crimes, but they were using it for that.
[43:19.940 --> 43:23.720]  And the legislature fixed that for us by completely repealing it.
[43:23.720 --> 43:25.400]  They got rid of it in its entirety.
[43:25.400 --> 43:28.360]  Yeah, and the courts are still doing it.
[43:28.360 --> 43:29.360]  Exactly.
[43:29.360 --> 43:35.440]  And the attorneys are still quoting case law that depends on the repealed statute.
[43:35.440 --> 43:40.560]  That'll be fun hammering them over that.
[43:40.560 --> 43:46.520]  Yeah, here's the reason I do not memorize the cases, I memorize the statutes.
[43:46.520 --> 43:55.320]  Okay, hang on, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, our call-in number, 512-646-1984.
[43:55.320 --> 44:00.560]  Got a couple spots on the board, we'll be right back.
[44:00.560 --> 44:05.200]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[44:05.200 --> 44:06.560]  of nutrition.
[44:06.560 --> 44:11.280]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[44:11.280 --> 44:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[44:17.000 --> 44:23.320]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, Young Jevity can
[44:23.320 --> 44:25.520]  provide the nutrients you need.
[44:25.520 --> 44:30.560]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[44:30.560 --> 44:31.560]  we reject.
[44:31.560 --> 44:36.800]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[44:36.800 --> 44:40.000]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[44:40.000 --> 44:45.920]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[44:45.920 --> 44:47.560]  quality radio.
[44:47.560 --> 44:51.440]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[44:51.440 --> 44:57.240]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[44:57.240 --> 44:59.120]  increase your income.
[44:59.120 --> 45:00.120]  Order now.
[45:00.120 --> 45:04.320]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.320 --> 45:09.960]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, force
[45:09.960 --> 45:14.280]  your CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:14.280 --> 45:18.800]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:18.800 --> 45:23.120]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.120 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.760]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.760 --> 45:39.280]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[45:39.280 --> 45:43.560]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.560 --> 45:49.680]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.680 --> 46:10.000]  pro se tactics, and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[46:10.000 --> 46:33.680]  to sign up for our free course at www.ruleoflawradio.com.
[46:33.680 --> 46:41.960]  Okay.
[46:41.960 --> 46:42.960]  We are back.
[46:42.960 --> 46:46.880]  We're in the Kelton Brent Fountain with Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Mike in
[46:46.880 --> 46:47.880]  Tennessee.
[46:47.880 --> 46:51.800]  Mike, should we call you Hillbilly Mike?
[46:51.800 --> 46:52.800]  No.
[46:52.800 --> 46:59.280]  Just call me this old Mike, that's all.
[46:59.280 --> 47:02.000]  Okay.
[47:02.000 --> 47:08.920]  We started out talking about Rick and kind of drifted off of him, but I'm going to go
[47:08.920 --> 47:16.760]  up to New York on the 15th, up to see the Pastor Massad, and we're hoping Rick is going
[47:16.760 --> 47:22.880]  to try to come up there and see us while we're up there.
[47:22.880 --> 47:29.360]  He's been wanting to meet with me for a while, and I'm not sure why.
[47:29.360 --> 47:35.080]  He apparently has something going on that he didn't want to discuss on the electronic
[47:35.080 --> 47:46.120]  media, and Eddie, I definitely want to get you with him.
[47:46.120 --> 47:53.040]  He's doing some pretty big things, but he's not as good with the details as he needs to
[47:53.040 --> 47:54.040]  be.
[47:54.040 --> 48:00.000]  That's one thing I do well, is detail.
[48:00.000 --> 48:03.000]  Yes, you do.
[48:03.000 --> 48:04.000]  And this will help.
[48:04.000 --> 48:06.920]  Do you have any other questions for us, Mike?
[48:06.920 --> 48:09.680]  Can you hear me?
[48:09.680 --> 48:10.680]  Yes.
[48:10.680 --> 48:15.480]  Okay, because I was talking earlier, and it seemed like you didn't hear me.
[48:15.480 --> 48:18.960]  So, is that his real name is Rick Martin?
[48:18.960 --> 48:19.960]  Yes.
[48:19.960 --> 48:20.960]  Oh, okay.
[48:20.960 --> 48:27.960]  So, I think he did pretty darn well for somebody in Sweet Jurors standing there as his own
[48:27.960 --> 48:28.960]  man.
[48:28.960 --> 48:31.960]  Oh, he's doing really well.
[48:31.960 --> 48:35.080]  I criticized Dr. Martin.
[48:35.080 --> 48:39.080]  It wasn't a $60,000 award.
[48:39.080 --> 48:44.240]  It was a quarter of a million dollar judgment he got from a Houston, Texas jury, and they
[48:44.240 --> 48:46.240]  got it right.
[48:46.240 --> 48:50.040]  Well, he's done a whole lot more since then.
[48:50.040 --> 48:51.960]  He's been really busy.
[48:51.960 --> 49:01.520]  But his cousin, Dr. Martin, wrote this criminal complaint against the SEC, and I criticized
[49:01.520 --> 49:02.520]  it to somebody.
[49:02.520 --> 49:11.480]  And it got back to Rick, and he thought I was criticizing Dr. Martin, and I wasn't.
[49:11.480 --> 49:17.320]  He didn't know how to correctly structure the complaint.
[49:17.320 --> 49:25.660]  He put in the statute that he felt like they violated, but he didn't allege the elements
[49:25.660 --> 49:31.320]  of the statute.
[49:31.320 --> 49:37.240]  You have to allege each of the elements of the crime in order for the complaint to be
[49:37.240 --> 49:40.120]  complete.
[49:40.120 --> 49:42.720]  And that's what he missed.
[49:42.720 --> 49:47.760]  So he's going to have me go over some of his documents, and that's why I wanted to get
[49:47.760 --> 49:54.560]  Eddie involved, because he's got a really big following.
[49:54.560 --> 49:59.200]  And since he's one of us, I want his documents right.
[49:59.200 --> 50:04.440]  And I want to go over them for him and make sure he hasn't missed any of the details.
[50:04.440 --> 50:10.800]  Yeah, because y'all have been really helping sharpen up his game there, and that's the
[50:10.800 --> 50:13.400]  whole idea.
[50:13.400 --> 50:19.800]  Y'all get together and put your brains together, what you guys got, more so than some of these.
[50:19.800 --> 50:24.800]  Yeah, well, Eddie and I, we're the detail guys.
[50:24.800 --> 50:29.760]  They've got the grand notions and the grand ideas, and they create their documents, and
[50:29.760 --> 50:34.800]  then we can go in and tweak them out so we haven't missed anything.
[50:34.800 --> 50:39.800]  Yeah, and I believe you said you're self-taught, right?
[50:39.800 --> 50:40.800]  Yes.
[50:40.800 --> 50:47.480]  Yeah, see, this is what they call us, they try to call y'all sovereign, that y'all don't
[50:47.480 --> 50:51.960]  know what you're talking about, telling all these lies about y'all, y'all got more sense
[50:51.960 --> 50:53.440]  than they got.
[50:53.440 --> 50:56.640]  Well, we don't call ourselves sovereign.
[50:56.640 --> 51:01.560]  Well, for somebody who doesn't know what they're talking about, I sure get invited to speak
[51:01.560 --> 51:06.720]  before a lot of attorneys and big firms about the stuff that I do.
[51:06.720 --> 51:13.040]  Usually it's the ones that represent the Texas Municipal Education League and so on and so
[51:13.040 --> 51:14.160]  forth.
[51:14.160 --> 51:18.200]  They're trying to get me to come talk to them about the things that I understand about the
[51:18.200 --> 51:23.920]  traffic code and the rules of procedure so they can figure out a way to prosecute or
[51:23.920 --> 51:26.560]  defend against it.
[51:26.560 --> 51:30.840]  They're not looking for information to learn the truth, they're looking for ways to combat
[51:30.840 --> 51:33.760]  the information I'm putting out there.
[51:33.760 --> 51:38.440]  Oh, I didn't tell you, I sued those guys.
[51:38.440 --> 51:41.760]  You're not a deputy sheriff, you didn't used to be a deputy sheriff, you only worked two
[51:41.760 --> 51:45.280]  weeks as a dealer, so I hear all the negative stuff.
[51:45.280 --> 51:51.360]  It was actually longer than two weeks, I was down there two or three months, I can't remember
[51:51.360 --> 51:57.680]  exactly how long, but I got fired because my supervisor screwed up a booking computer
[51:57.680 --> 52:01.880]  and then tried to lay it off on my head after he asked me to help him get it back up and
[52:01.880 --> 52:03.880]  running.
[52:03.880 --> 52:09.400]  Yeah, that was the CO down there.
[52:09.400 --> 52:13.240]  Well, that was my supervising sergeant, yes.
[52:13.240 --> 52:18.000]  Yeah, your CO, but like I said, I don't believe none of that stuff, but they'd be trying to
[52:18.000 --> 52:22.400]  say, because I already know it's this bunch of hogwash.
[52:22.400 --> 52:28.400]  Well unlike most of the people out there trying to sell you hogwash, one thing, every time
[52:28.400 --> 52:33.080]  I tell you something, I give you the specific place where I got it from and I go through
[52:33.080 --> 52:37.600]  the specific reasoning about how I came to the conclusion that I did based upon that
[52:37.600 --> 52:41.880]  information.
[52:41.880 --> 52:47.480]  As you know, I implore everyone to go read it for themselves, do not take my word for
[52:47.480 --> 52:51.960]  anything, go read it for yourself and see if you come up with something different.
[52:51.960 --> 52:55.920]  But if you read all these things together and you come up with something different,
[52:55.920 --> 52:59.120]  you're going to have to explain to me how you did that because I sure as hell don't
[52:59.120 --> 53:01.120]  see how you could have.
[53:01.120 --> 53:04.800]  But if you can, great.
[53:04.800 --> 53:09.240]  So yeah, I don't put any stock in what people say about me or anything like that.
[53:09.240 --> 53:12.600]  I know what I know and I can prove what I know.
[53:12.600 --> 53:14.960]  I don't give a crap what anybody else thinks about it.
[53:14.960 --> 53:21.040]  Either find me an actual argument that defeats mine or you're just talking out the wrong
[53:21.040 --> 53:22.040]  side of your face.
[53:22.040 --> 53:24.040]  That's all there is to it.
[53:24.040 --> 53:28.600]  Yeah, that's what they do when you hit the nerve, when you're on point.
[53:28.600 --> 53:33.640]  They're trying to sit there and talk you out, make up all types of lies and stories about
[53:33.640 --> 53:34.640]  somebody.
[53:34.640 --> 53:43.960]  Yeah, well, as the old saying goes, you catch the most flak when you're over the target.
[53:43.960 --> 53:46.480]  Catch the most flak when you're over the target.
[53:46.480 --> 53:48.800]  Yeah, that's an old bomber expression.
[53:48.800 --> 53:52.320]  Yeah, I'm very familiar with that concept.
[53:52.320 --> 53:55.560]  My kids love fireworks demonstrations.
[53:55.560 --> 53:58.120]  I don't like them so much.
[53:58.120 --> 54:01.360]  I have a different perspective.
[54:01.360 --> 54:05.840]  Fireworks look totally different when you're up top and they're coming up at you.
[54:05.840 --> 54:06.840]  Yeah.
[54:06.840 --> 54:10.600]  But let me tell y'all what that old boy did down there in Houston.
[54:10.600 --> 54:16.480]  I'm telling you, that can work in all 50 states and that's what piqued my interest.
[54:16.480 --> 54:22.280]  Randy, I sent you an email, so I hope you're sending out that request because I should
[54:22.280 --> 54:24.840]  like to talk to you.
[54:24.840 --> 54:25.840]  Okay.
[54:25.840 --> 54:29.880]  I will forward your email to him.
[54:29.880 --> 54:38.280]  He was supposed to email me today about something, but he's been a real fighter.
[54:38.280 --> 54:39.480]  He's really been after him.
[54:39.480 --> 54:44.920]  They're after him in New York right now because he's helping people.
[54:44.920 --> 54:48.520]  So he's definitely one of us.
[54:48.520 --> 54:53.760]  Maybe I can get Pastor Massey to put together another Gathering of Eagles.
[54:53.760 --> 54:57.160]  He did that about 10 years ago.
[54:57.160 --> 55:04.000]  He brought together all of the primary legal reform guys in the country, all in upstate
[55:04.000 --> 55:05.000]  New York.
[55:05.000 --> 55:09.840]  Maybe I can get him to do that again.
[55:09.840 --> 55:14.280]  This is a good time for us all to be on the same page.
[55:14.280 --> 55:15.280]  Yeah.
[55:15.280 --> 55:23.560]  I mean, brilliant minds like y'all, so that's why I keep a good listening on the Logos radio
[55:23.560 --> 55:24.560]  there.
[55:24.560 --> 55:30.040]  Ain't nobody else talking the truth where y'all talking, so that's why I keep it locked
[55:30.040 --> 55:36.120]  on there and keep listening and keep my head in books, trying to learn stuff myself.
[55:36.120 --> 55:42.760]  So I sent you that email, I think last week, you should have already gotten it.
[55:42.760 --> 55:44.880]  Yeah, I think I have it.
[55:44.880 --> 55:50.600]  Yeah, and it was him and the other man you were telling me about, Mr. Scarlett.
[55:50.600 --> 56:01.320]  Yeah, Ted, I forwarded it to Ted and to Tina, but they were in California.
[56:01.320 --> 56:03.560]  I thought you were in California at the time.
[56:03.560 --> 56:09.840]  No, remember I was talking about that probate thing out there and that's who you were telling
[56:09.840 --> 56:10.840]  me about.
[56:10.840 --> 56:11.840]  Oh, okay.
[56:11.840 --> 56:14.880]  Well, they're the wrong ones because they're both out in California.
[56:14.880 --> 56:17.640]  I will forward your email to Rick.
[56:17.640 --> 56:22.520]  No, no, listen, listen, listen, that's what I'm telling you.
[56:22.520 --> 56:24.720]  That probate thing is in California.
[56:24.720 --> 56:25.720]  Okay.
[56:25.720 --> 56:30.960]  Well, I've already sent it to Ted Scarlett.
[56:30.960 --> 56:33.080]  I think Ted, did Ted respond to you?
[56:33.080 --> 56:38.320]  I know he responded to me indicating he got it.
[56:38.320 --> 56:41.560]  I haven't heard from Rick Martin or Ted yet.
[56:41.560 --> 56:46.520]  Anyway, we will talk about that off the air and do you have any other questions or comments
[56:46.520 --> 56:47.520]  for us?
[56:47.520 --> 56:52.360]  No, I'll just appreciate y'all telling the truth over the air and I'll let somebody else
[56:52.360 --> 56:53.360]  get in.
[56:53.360 --> 56:54.360]  Y'all have a good evening.
[56:54.360 --> 56:55.360]  Thank you, Mike.
[56:55.360 --> 56:56.360]  Okay.
[56:56.360 --> 56:57.360]  Thank you, Mike.
[56:57.360 --> 56:58.360]  Okay.
[56:58.360 --> 57:04.560]  We've still got a minute and 47.
[57:04.560 --> 57:05.560]  Okay.
[57:05.560 --> 57:08.160]  We've got Shane from New York.
[57:08.160 --> 57:11.720]  Shane, what do you have for us today?
[57:11.720 --> 57:13.320]  How you doing, Randy?
[57:13.320 --> 57:16.800]  I don't know if I can do it in a minute and 40 minutes.
[57:16.800 --> 57:21.040]  No, just in this segment, we've got another hour.
[57:21.040 --> 57:23.040]  Yeah, I just, two things.
[57:23.040 --> 57:28.360]  I wanted to let you know I stopped the foreclosure sale for the sixth time a few weeks ago.
[57:28.360 --> 57:29.360]  Oh, good.
[57:29.360 --> 57:35.760]  Yeah, we filed chapter 13, so we did not allow them to sell the property by using the key
[57:35.760 --> 57:42.040]  lock, the second key lock that was discharged under chapter seven about three years ago.
[57:42.040 --> 57:46.960]  So 13 was filed and stopped the sale of the property.
[57:46.960 --> 57:50.880]  So that was really kind of excited about that.
[57:50.880 --> 57:53.880]  And so we're on for commercial.
[57:53.880 --> 57:56.560]  You've got a minute left.
[57:56.560 --> 57:57.560]  Go ahead.
[57:57.560 --> 57:58.560]  Okay.
[57:58.560 --> 57:59.560]  Yeah.
[57:59.560 --> 58:04.840]  So anyways, I want to let you know about that and I wasn't going to talk briefly on the
[58:04.840 --> 58:08.280]  bankruptcy because we're going to probably file an adversary proceeding, but as of today,
[58:08.280 --> 58:11.040]  nobody's filed a proof of claim yet.
[58:11.040 --> 58:15.760]  They probably don't have a proof of claim that they can file.
[58:15.760 --> 58:22.480]  Oh, when we come back, there's one thing I want to talk about that nobody's doing that
[58:22.480 --> 58:28.680]  everybody needs to be doing, and that's the false fees filed on the HUD once settlement
[58:28.680 --> 58:29.680]  statement.
[58:29.680 --> 58:32.520]  Have you raised an issue about that?
[58:32.520 --> 58:38.240]  They haven't filed a proof of claim, so we haven't even gotten to that point yet.
[58:38.240 --> 58:39.240]  Okay.
[58:39.240 --> 58:40.240]  Hang on.
[58:40.240 --> 58:47.640]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Root of Law Radio, our call-in number, 512-646-1984.
[58:47.640 --> 58:48.880]  We've got room on the board.
[58:48.880 --> 58:50.280]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.280 --> 58:54.440]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.440 --> 58:59.600]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that
[58:59.600 --> 59:00.960]  can really help.
[59:00.960 --> 59:05.440]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available
[59:05.440 --> 59:06.440]  today.
[59:06.440 --> 59:10.320]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you
[59:10.320 --> 59:13.440]  to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.440 --> 59:18.680]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.680 --> 59:22.960]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan
[59:22.960 --> 59:27.880]  of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church.
[59:27.880 --> 59:32.920]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:32.920 --> 59:40.680]  Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.680 --> 59:48.600]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:48.600 --> 01:00:02.200]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.200 --> 01:00:05.880]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:00:05.880 --> 01:00:09.320]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:00:09.320 --> 01:00:10.800]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:00:10.800 --> 01:00:14.700]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:00:14.700 --> 01:00:17.200]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:00:17.200 --> 01:00:19.160]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:00:19.160 --> 01:00:22.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:00:22.760 --> 01:00:27.560]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:00:27.560 --> 01:00:32.640]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:00:32.640 --> 01:00:35.320]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:00:35.320 --> 01:00:39.600]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:00:39.600 --> 01:00:43.140]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:00:43.140 --> 01:00:45.440]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:00:45.440 --> 01:00:48.920]  Imagine your mom and dad are getting ready for bed.
[01:00:48.920 --> 01:00:52.000]  They pull back the covers and find a third party there.
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.200]  He announces, I'm with the military and I'm sleeping here tonight.
[01:00:55.200 --> 01:00:59.320]  That shocking image of a third party in my parents' bed reminds me what the Third Amendment
[01:00:59.320 --> 01:01:00.920]  was designed to prevent.
[01:01:00.920 --> 01:01:05.120]  It protects us from being forced to share our homes with soldiers, a common demand in
[01:01:05.120 --> 01:01:07.260]  the days of our founding fathers.
[01:01:07.260 --> 01:01:09.560]  Third party, Third Amendment, get it?
[01:01:09.560 --> 01:01:13.440]  So if you answer a knock at your door and guys in fatigues demand lodging, tell them
[01:01:13.440 --> 01:01:17.080]  to dust off their copy of the Bill of Rights and reread the Third Amendment.
[01:01:17.080 --> 01:01:18.800]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:01:18.800 --> 01:01:32.080]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:32.080 --> 01:01:35.760]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[01:01:35.760 --> 01:01:39.200]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[01:01:39.200 --> 01:01:40.680]  Our liberty depends on it.
[01:01:40.680 --> 01:01:44.560]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[01:01:44.560 --> 01:01:47.560]  one of your constitutional rights.
[01:01:47.560 --> 01:01:49.160]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:49.160 --> 01:01:52.760]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.760 --> 01:01:57.520]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.520 --> 01:02:02.600]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.600 --> 01:02:05.280]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.280 --> 01:02:09.580]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[01:02:09.580 --> 01:02:13.120]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[01:02:13.120 --> 01:02:16.800]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:16.800 --> 01:02:22.160]  Imagine four eyes staring at you through binoculars, a magnifying glass or a pair of x-ray goggles.
[01:02:22.160 --> 01:02:26.640]  That imagery reminds me that the Fourth Amendment guarantees Americans freedom from unreasonable
[01:02:26.640 --> 01:02:28.120]  search and seizure.
[01:02:28.120 --> 01:02:31.280]  Fourth Amendment, four eyes staring at you, get it?
[01:02:31.280 --> 01:02:34.600]  Unfortunately, the government is trampling our Fourth Amendment rights in the name of
[01:02:34.600 --> 01:02:35.600]  security.
[01:02:35.600 --> 01:02:40.120]  This includes, case in point, TSA airport scanners that peer under your clothing.
[01:02:40.120 --> 01:02:44.120]  When government employees demand a peep at your privates without probable cause, I say
[01:02:44.120 --> 01:02:46.920]  it's time to sound the constitutional alarm bells.
[01:02:46.920 --> 01:02:51.240]  Join me in asking our representatives to dust off the Bill of Rights and use their googly
[01:02:51.240 --> 01:02:53.440]  eyes to take a gander at the Fourth.
[01:02:53.440 --> 01:02:55.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:02:55.280 --> 01:03:06.640]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:55.280 --> 01:04:20.880]  I wanted to back up and tell the listeners, this is a really interesting story as you
[01:04:20.880 --> 01:04:26.560]  know, we've been going on since November 2014.
[01:04:26.560 --> 01:04:30.920]  They tried to sell the property and not put it on the docket sheet.
[01:04:30.920 --> 01:04:38.040]  They also did not answer a motion that's been sitting at the county level, I think for almost
[01:04:38.040 --> 01:04:39.040]  two years now.
[01:04:39.040 --> 01:04:46.640]  Judge Latilio, she looks exactly like that girl from Rachel Maddock on MSNBC and she's
[01:04:46.640 --> 01:04:52.080]  in her 60s, so she's definitely far left and knows that we're Trump supporters, so I don't
[01:04:52.080 --> 01:04:56.440]  think whatever we filed, it would be denied.
[01:04:56.440 --> 01:05:04.960]  But what I wanted to tell you is, here it is, April the 29th now, going on the 30th,
[01:05:04.960 --> 01:05:11.200]  and that was filed two years ago, and she still has not put that motion into the record.
[01:05:11.200 --> 01:05:16.120]  We paid for it, set up a hearing date, and it's still not in the record, so I got a certified
[01:05:16.120 --> 01:05:22.320]  copy of the county court showing that she has not entered that motion into the record.
[01:05:22.320 --> 01:05:26.720]  And they were going to go ahead and sell the property on March 30th, and that's when we
[01:05:26.720 --> 01:05:30.560]  did bankruptcy the day before the sale.
[01:05:30.560 --> 01:05:31.560]  So I do...
[01:05:31.560 --> 01:05:40.400]  Well, unless I miss something, it's the duty of the clerk to file this in the record, not
[01:05:40.400 --> 01:05:44.040]  the judge.
[01:05:44.040 --> 01:05:49.440]  In New York, you take the motion into the Erie County Clerk's Office, which is upstate
[01:05:49.440 --> 01:05:56.120]  New York, and you take it up to the judge, and they're responsible to e-file into the
[01:05:56.120 --> 01:05:57.120]  system.
[01:05:57.120 --> 01:05:58.120]  Okay.
[01:05:58.120 --> 01:06:01.720]  You can sue the judge personally.
[01:06:01.720 --> 01:06:02.720]  That's right.
[01:06:02.720 --> 01:06:03.720]  Yeah.
[01:06:03.720 --> 01:06:06.840]  This is an administrative act, not a judicial one.
[01:06:06.840 --> 01:06:07.840]  Right.
[01:06:07.840 --> 01:06:14.920]  And I wanted to file a lawsuit, but right now we're in bankruptcy court, and they're
[01:06:14.920 --> 01:06:23.320]  scrambling around, and the trustee filed a motion around 3 o'clock this afternoon trying
[01:06:23.320 --> 01:06:29.320]  to dismiss the bankruptcy case for failure to prosecute of missing bankruptcy forms.
[01:06:29.320 --> 01:06:35.440]  And there's not one form that's missing, and she never mentioned it in her one-page motion
[01:06:35.440 --> 01:06:39.960]  at this case must be dismissed for failure to prosecute the hearings in a couple of weeks.
[01:06:39.960 --> 01:06:43.920]  We have time to respond to that, but they're working overtime.
[01:06:43.920 --> 01:06:46.960]  Every bankruptcy form has been filed.
[01:06:46.960 --> 01:06:51.840]  So have you filed criminally against the trustee?
[01:06:51.840 --> 01:06:53.400]  Not yet.
[01:06:53.400 --> 01:06:57.480]  It just happened this afternoon around 3, 4 o'clock.
[01:06:57.480 --> 01:06:58.480]  Yeah.
[01:06:58.480 --> 01:06:59.480]  So she's...
[01:06:59.480 --> 01:07:02.880]  Well, there's going to be a hearing out in a couple of weeks, but I did want to tell
[01:07:02.880 --> 01:07:04.440]  you that.
[01:07:04.440 --> 01:07:07.760]  And I want to let you know about that, and also about traveling.
[01:07:07.760 --> 01:07:11.200]  We had somebody on earlier you were talking regarding traveling.
[01:07:11.200 --> 01:07:12.200]  Somebody?
[01:07:12.200 --> 01:07:13.720]  We got somebody.
[01:07:13.720 --> 01:07:14.720]  Yeah.
[01:07:14.720 --> 01:07:17.320]  We got the Eddie Craig.
[01:07:17.320 --> 01:07:20.800]  Oh, no, not Eddie Craig.
[01:07:20.800 --> 01:07:23.560]  You were talking earlier about traveling and stuff.
[01:07:23.560 --> 01:07:26.680]  In New York, they will suspend...
[01:07:26.680 --> 01:07:27.680]  Oh, John.
[01:07:27.680 --> 01:07:28.680]  Yeah.
[01:07:28.680 --> 01:07:31.680]  Oh, John's a chump.
[01:07:31.680 --> 01:07:34.600]  Yeah, so in New York, I'm not sure.
[01:07:34.600 --> 01:07:38.440]  He's on the other side of the state, but my state, you can file everything you want.
[01:07:38.440 --> 01:07:43.200]  They will suspend your driver's license without a hearing.
[01:07:43.200 --> 01:07:49.320]  And you can bring statues, case law, all that wonderful stuff, and they will just laugh
[01:07:49.320 --> 01:07:50.320]  in your face.
[01:07:50.320 --> 01:07:54.600]  And they'll spend $5,000, $10,000 prosecuting a traffic case here.
[01:07:54.600 --> 01:07:55.600]  They don't care.
[01:07:55.600 --> 01:08:04.120]  Well, they will care when you coax them into violating an administrative duty.
[01:08:04.120 --> 01:08:05.600]  Right.
[01:08:05.600 --> 01:08:14.160]  Get them to violate something that they're commanded to do, like your judge not filing
[01:08:14.160 --> 01:08:17.560]  your motion into the record.
[01:08:17.560 --> 01:08:18.560]  That's administrative.
[01:08:18.560 --> 01:08:19.560]  Right.
[01:08:19.560 --> 01:08:22.800]  And for that, he has no immunity.
[01:08:22.800 --> 01:08:27.440]  So you get to...you make up a tort letter and send it to them, and then you do a storage
[01:08:27.440 --> 01:08:28.440]  doctrine request.
[01:08:28.440 --> 01:08:31.200]  Do you know what a storage doctrine request is?
[01:08:31.200 --> 01:08:33.520]  No, that's a new one.
[01:08:33.520 --> 01:08:34.520]  Okay.
[01:08:34.520 --> 01:08:37.640]  Here's what a storage is.
[01:08:37.640 --> 01:08:44.460]  The insurance company will pick up the litigation when you sue.
[01:08:44.460 --> 01:08:51.240]  And what the courts have said, that if the litigant makes an offer to settle that's within
[01:08:51.240 --> 01:09:01.440]  the limits of your insurance policy, and the insurer elects not to settle, if the case
[01:09:01.440 --> 01:09:12.440]  goes to trial and the defender, the plaintiff, wins more than the amount that they're insured
[01:09:12.440 --> 01:09:17.240]  for, it would be improper to charge that to the client.
[01:09:17.240 --> 01:09:23.360]  They're saying that the insurance company cannot play fast and lose the client's money.
[01:09:23.360 --> 01:09:31.600]  So if they refuse to take an offer and it goes to litigation and they lose more than
[01:09:31.600 --> 01:09:39.240]  the insurance limits, they have to pay it all.
[01:09:39.240 --> 01:09:40.720]  Okay.
[01:09:40.720 --> 01:09:48.200]  Otherwise their client would have to pay it because the insurance company chose not to
[01:09:48.200 --> 01:09:49.860]  take the deal.
[01:09:49.860 --> 01:09:55.800]  So what you do is you file a suit against them, and then you find out what their bond
[01:09:55.800 --> 01:10:02.960]  is and make an offer to settle just slightly less than their bond.
[01:10:02.960 --> 01:10:05.760]  And they'll almost always settle.
[01:10:05.760 --> 01:10:11.560]  The way you get to them is to get in their pocketbook.
[01:10:11.560 --> 01:10:12.560]  Yeah.
[01:10:12.560 --> 01:10:13.560]  Eddie?
[01:10:13.560 --> 01:10:18.880]  We've got Eddie Craig on.
[01:10:18.880 --> 01:10:22.760]  This is what I'm going to do to the judges.
[01:10:22.760 --> 01:10:30.000]  I had this judge in Rome, Texas, that I put a subject matter jurisdiction challenge in
[01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:32.200]  front of him and he denied it.
[01:10:32.200 --> 01:10:37.840]  A lot of things you can do with the subject matter jurisdiction challenge, deny is not
[01:10:37.840 --> 01:10:39.680]  one of them.
[01:10:39.680 --> 01:10:46.560]  So I'm going to claim that he lacks jurisdiction because since he lacks jurisdiction, he lacks
[01:10:46.560 --> 01:10:48.000]  immunity.
[01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:55.640]  Also I gave him a criminal complaint, a verified criminal affidavit against his clerk, and
[01:10:55.640 --> 01:11:01.140]  he did not issue a warrant in accordance with 15.09.
[01:11:01.140 --> 01:11:03.800]  So I'm going to sue him personally for that.
[01:11:03.800 --> 01:11:06.480]  I did that to a judge in Victoria County.
[01:11:06.480 --> 01:11:11.760]  I went in and gave him four criminal complaints, and he said, are you an attorney?
[01:11:11.760 --> 01:11:13.800]  Oh, no, no, no.
[01:11:13.800 --> 01:11:16.480]  I sleep well at night and keep my hands in my own pockets.
[01:11:16.480 --> 01:11:17.480]  Thank you very much.
[01:11:17.480 --> 01:11:19.240]  Well, did you talk to an attorney?
[01:11:19.240 --> 01:11:20.240]  No, no, no.
[01:11:20.240 --> 01:11:22.200]  I don't waste my time with those shysters.
[01:11:22.200 --> 01:11:25.040]  Well, if you're not an attorney, I'm not even going to read these.
[01:11:25.040 --> 01:11:27.880]  He threw them down and stormed out.
[01:11:27.880 --> 01:11:33.440]  I watched him leave, and the clerks were standing there, sitting over at their desks, and they're
[01:11:33.440 --> 01:11:35.680]  kind of taken aback.
[01:11:35.680 --> 01:11:40.400]  And I said, well, Bubba, we'll see how that works out for you.
[01:11:40.400 --> 01:11:45.280]  Took out my cell phone, dialed 911, asked for a police officer to arrest him.
[01:11:45.280 --> 01:11:53.800]  Well, I got him to take my criminal complaint against him, and then I sued him personally.
[01:11:53.800 --> 01:11:57.380]  And I won't go into all the details on that.
[01:11:57.380 --> 01:12:02.360]  But he had to hire a lawyer and come to court with me.
[01:12:02.360 --> 01:12:07.320]  You have to know, when we got in court with him, he wasn't near so arrogant as he was
[01:12:07.320 --> 01:12:09.560]  that first day.
[01:12:09.560 --> 01:12:13.160]  And right now, I'm setting him up so I can do that to him.
[01:12:13.160 --> 01:12:18.960]  I think if we're going to beat these guys, if we're going to get them to follow the law,
[01:12:18.960 --> 01:12:20.440]  this is how we're going to do it.
[01:12:20.440 --> 01:12:23.800]  Well, now, can I ask you something real quick, Randy?
[01:12:23.800 --> 01:12:24.800]  Absolutely.
[01:12:24.800 --> 01:12:29.760]  What is the section of law that you're relying upon to say that he has to issue the warrant?
[01:12:29.760 --> 01:12:35.440]  Does it specifically say that you must give a complaint or that you must give a sworn
[01:12:35.440 --> 01:12:36.440]  complaint?
[01:12:36.440 --> 01:12:42.040]  It doesn't say a sworn, but I always give sworn complaints no matter what.
[01:12:42.040 --> 01:12:46.080]  Well, a verified complaint is not a sworn complaint, according to Texas law.
[01:12:46.080 --> 01:12:49.280]  Yeah, I know what it is.
[01:12:49.280 --> 01:12:54.760]  I swear on my oath that all the facts in here are true to the best of my knowledge.
[01:12:54.760 --> 01:12:55.760]  Under penalty of perjury.
[01:12:55.760 --> 01:13:03.600]  If it does not have a penalty of perjury affirmation on it, it is not a sworn document, according
[01:13:03.600 --> 01:13:04.600]  to Texas law.
[01:13:04.600 --> 01:13:05.600]  Yeah.
[01:13:05.600 --> 01:13:08.360]  I've never had one of them that knew the difference anyway.
[01:13:08.360 --> 01:13:12.480]  But yes, I always do a sworn.
[01:13:12.480 --> 01:13:15.360]  And this one doesn't say that it needs to be.
[01:13:15.360 --> 01:13:21.180]  It just says it must be signed by the AFE unit by writing his name or affixing his mark.
[01:13:21.180 --> 01:13:26.960]  So it doesn't demand that, but it's always a good idea to just go ahead and do it.
[01:13:26.960 --> 01:13:33.660]  Well, the fact that it says AFE it indicates that it has to have the proper juror.
[01:13:33.660 --> 01:13:37.740]  You can't be an affiant without personal knowledge.
[01:13:37.740 --> 01:13:42.480]  You can be an accuser without personal knowledge, but you cannot be an affiant without personal
[01:13:42.480 --> 01:13:48.260]  knowledge and personal knowledge must have a penalty of perjury juror.
[01:13:48.260 --> 01:13:54.720]  I don't know about that because 1505 subsection two says that it can be on information and
[01:13:54.720 --> 01:13:55.720]  belief.
[01:13:55.720 --> 01:14:03.360]  It says that's the verified complaint that is not the sworn statement that Texas constitution
[01:14:03.360 --> 01:14:04.960]  says has to be taken.
[01:14:04.960 --> 01:14:08.480]  It's not the sworn complaint that the rest of the code of criminal procedure says has
[01:14:08.480 --> 01:14:09.480]  to be taken.
[01:14:09.480 --> 01:14:10.480]  Hold on.
[01:14:10.480 --> 01:14:12.360]  You're ahead of the game.
[01:14:12.360 --> 01:14:16.080]  This is how you initiate the process.
[01:14:16.080 --> 01:14:23.480]  You initiate it with a complaint, not a sworn affidavit.
[01:14:23.480 --> 01:14:27.720]  And the complaint is it's scripted how it must be.
[01:14:27.720 --> 01:14:36.200]  It must run in the name of the state of Texas and it must state that the accuser has reason
[01:14:36.200 --> 01:14:40.240]  to believe and does believe.
[01:14:40.240 --> 01:14:42.640]  That's scripted by statute.
[01:14:42.640 --> 01:14:43.640]  I agree.
[01:14:43.640 --> 01:14:46.360]  However, there's a problem there.
[01:14:46.360 --> 01:14:47.360]  Okay.
[01:14:47.360 --> 01:14:52.640]  Again, they are taking those verified complaints and moving straight to trial with no probable
[01:14:52.640 --> 01:14:53.880]  cause hearing.
[01:14:53.880 --> 01:14:55.160]  Okay.
[01:14:55.160 --> 01:15:00.400]  And so they're basing your prosecution upon something that's believed, but is not being
[01:15:00.400 --> 01:15:03.760]  attested to by a person with personal knowledge.
[01:15:03.760 --> 01:15:07.680]  If you look at the actual language of the code of criminal procedure in the Texas constitution,
[01:15:07.680 --> 01:15:12.560]  a verified complaint has power to do one thing and one thing only.
[01:15:12.560 --> 01:15:15.640]  State an official investigation into the allegation made.
[01:15:15.640 --> 01:15:17.640]  It cannot be used to process this.
[01:15:17.640 --> 01:15:18.640]  Yeah.
[01:15:18.640 --> 01:15:19.640]  Yeah.
[01:15:19.640 --> 01:15:20.640]  Yeah.
[01:15:20.640 --> 01:15:21.640]  If you read it, Randy.
[01:15:21.640 --> 01:15:22.640]  Hold on.
[01:15:22.640 --> 01:15:23.640]  Read 1509.
[01:15:23.640 --> 01:15:24.720]  I've read 1509.
[01:15:24.720 --> 01:15:29.960]  I've read every section of statute in every code dealing with a complaint and what is
[01:15:29.960 --> 01:15:30.960]  required for the...
[01:15:30.960 --> 01:15:35.760]  This says he is to issue a warrant forthwith.
[01:15:35.760 --> 01:15:42.240]  Well, that makes sense because he is going to be the magistrate who investigates into
[01:15:42.240 --> 01:15:43.240]  that matter.
[01:15:43.240 --> 01:15:44.960]  He's going to make inquiry into it.
[01:15:44.960 --> 01:15:45.960]  Yeah.
[01:15:45.960 --> 01:15:46.960]  Like 211 says he needs to.
[01:15:46.960 --> 01:15:47.960]  Well, no, wait a minute.
[01:15:47.960 --> 01:15:48.960]  Wait a minute.
[01:15:48.960 --> 01:15:55.160]  The judges, the examining trial is a different process from the investigation.
[01:15:55.160 --> 01:16:00.440]  The examining trial is to look into the complaint itself where the charge is actually coming
[01:16:00.440 --> 01:16:01.900]  before the court.
[01:16:01.900 --> 01:16:08.120]  That's the sworn complaint according to the code of criminal procedure and the Texas constitution.
[01:16:08.120 --> 01:16:11.760]  So if you actually look at the way it's laid out in the code of criminal procedure, it
[01:16:11.760 --> 01:16:13.160]  goes like this.
[01:16:13.160 --> 01:16:18.760]  The verified complaint is enough to initiate an actual official investigation by a law
[01:16:18.760 --> 01:16:19.760]  enforcement agency.
[01:16:19.760 --> 01:16:20.760]  Okay?
[01:16:20.760 --> 01:16:21.760]  Wait.
[01:16:21.760 --> 01:16:22.760]  Where'd you come up with that?
[01:16:22.760 --> 01:16:23.760]  I'll explain it.
[01:16:23.760 --> 01:16:24.760]  Okay.
[01:16:24.760 --> 01:16:28.760]  The law enforcement agency then conducts the investigation.
[01:16:28.760 --> 01:16:34.000]  Then once they find evidence in support of the allegation, that officer now has personal
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:38.280]  knowledge of the evidence supporting the facts of the case.
[01:16:38.280 --> 01:16:44.200]  The officer then goes before the prosecuting attorney for the state and swears out a complaint
[01:16:44.200 --> 01:16:46.200]  with a proper juror.
[01:16:46.200 --> 01:16:48.200]  That gets reduced to an information.
[01:16:48.200 --> 01:16:53.480]  The information, that complaint, and the original verified complaint all get put together and
[01:16:53.480 --> 01:16:55.040]  sent up for an indictment.
[01:16:55.040 --> 01:17:00.240]  There are actually four things required, not three.
[01:17:00.240 --> 01:17:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.300]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[01:17:13.300 --> 01:17:14.640]  can win too.
[01:17:14.640 --> 01:17:19.120]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[01:17:19.120 --> 01:17:24.920]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[01:17:24.920 --> 01:17:29.520]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[01:17:29.520 --> 01:17:33.740]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:17:33.740 --> 01:17:38.840]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:17:38.840 --> 01:17:40.800]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:17:40.800 --> 01:17:46.520]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:17:46.520 --> 01:17:49.520]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:17:49.520 --> 01:17:58.500]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[01:17:58.500 --> 01:18:00.240]  collectors now.
[01:18:00.240 --> 01:18:01.240]  I love logos.
[01:18:01.240 --> 01:18:04.520]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.520 --> 01:18:07.440]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.440 --> 01:18:08.440]  I need my truth fixed.
[01:18:08.440 --> 01:18:13.360]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.360 --> 01:18:17.120]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't
[01:18:17.120 --> 01:18:20.480]  have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.480 --> 01:18:21.960]  How can I help logos?
[01:18:21.960 --> 01:18:24.040]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.040 --> 01:18:26.800]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:18:26.800 --> 01:18:29.400]  You can order them your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.400 --> 01:18:31.560]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.560 --> 01:18:37.640]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.640 --> 01:18:43.520]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link, and logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.520 --> 01:18:44.520]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.520 --> 01:18:45.520]  No.
[01:18:45.520 --> 01:18:47.120]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.120 --> 01:18:48.120]  No.
[01:18:48.120 --> 01:18:49.120]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.120 --> 01:18:50.120]  No.
[01:18:50.120 --> 01:18:51.120]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.120 --> 01:18:52.120]  Wow.
[01:18:52.120 --> 01:18:55.960]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect.
[01:18:55.960 --> 01:18:56.960]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.960 --> 01:18:57.960]  You're welcome.
[01:18:57.960 --> 01:18:59.960]  Happy holidays, logos.
[01:19:27.960 --> 01:19:46.960]  If I can't get everything I want, yeah, maybe get a range, yeah, hey.
[01:19:46.960 --> 01:19:57.760]  If I can't get everything I need, yeah, maybe get a range, yeah, hey.
[01:19:57.760 --> 01:19:58.960]  Okay.
[01:19:58.960 --> 01:19:59.960]  We are back.
[01:19:59.960 --> 01:20:03.120]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:20:03.120 --> 01:20:05.640]  And we've got a special guest on today, Eddie Craig.
[01:20:05.640 --> 01:20:12.240]  And when we went out, we were talking about how the complaint process actually works.
[01:20:12.240 --> 01:20:21.400]  In my case, I'm only going to the complaint part because 15.09 commands the judge when
[01:20:21.400 --> 01:20:25.880]  they receive a complaint to issue a warrant.
[01:20:25.880 --> 01:20:28.320]  Now, Shane, you're in New York.
[01:20:28.320 --> 01:20:36.320]  In New York, it says that the magistrate shall examine into the sufficiency of the complaint.
[01:20:36.320 --> 01:20:42.200]  In most every other state, it says the same thing, but not in Texas.
[01:20:42.200 --> 01:20:48.720]  In Texas, he's to issue a warrant and the person's either to be arrested on the warrant
[01:20:48.720 --> 01:20:52.680]  or he's to issue a summons and the person's to come to court.
[01:20:52.680 --> 01:20:56.580]  And then they have the accuser and the accused there.
[01:20:56.580 --> 01:21:03.080]  Now they can hold a proper examining trial.
[01:21:03.080 --> 01:21:08.120]  The other things you were talking about, Eddie, about the investigation and the sworn affidavit,
[01:21:08.120 --> 01:21:12.840]  actually, they don't need an affidavit at this time.
[01:21:12.840 --> 01:21:13.840]  They can do this.
[01:21:13.840 --> 01:21:16.840]  They can do the examining trial on the complaint.
[01:21:16.840 --> 01:21:22.040]  And then the magistrate is ordered to seal the document, all the documents had in the
[01:21:22.040 --> 01:21:23.600]  hearing in an envelope.
[01:21:23.600 --> 01:21:28.320]  The complaint statement of all witnesses and all other documents shall be sealed up in
[01:21:28.320 --> 01:21:34.120]  an envelope with the name of the magistrate written across the seal of the envelope and
[01:21:34.120 --> 01:21:36.400]  forwarded to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction.
[01:21:36.400 --> 01:21:37.400]  That's 17.30.
[01:21:37.400 --> 01:21:38.400]  I agree.
[01:21:38.400 --> 01:21:39.400]  Can I interject?
[01:21:39.400 --> 01:21:40.400]  17.31.
[01:21:40.400 --> 01:21:44.680]  Let me do just this when I'm done.
[01:21:44.680 --> 01:21:51.040]  17.31 says the clerk shall keep all those papers safe and deliver them up to the next
[01:21:51.040 --> 01:21:52.320]  grand jury.
[01:21:52.320 --> 01:21:53.320]  Right.
[01:21:53.320 --> 01:21:55.760]  Now, let me ask this question.
[01:21:55.760 --> 01:22:02.040]  Since the Texas Constitution never mentions a complaint, it mentions only a sworn statement.
[01:22:02.040 --> 01:22:06.820]  And Texas law within the Code of Criminal Procedure specifically defines sworn as having
[01:22:06.820 --> 01:22:11.240]  a jurat stating that's being signed under penalty of perjury, which can only be done
[01:22:11.240 --> 01:22:13.240]  by a person with firsthand knowledge.
[01:22:13.240 --> 01:22:15.040]  It cannot be done upon belief.
[01:22:15.040 --> 01:22:18.200]  Do we agree on that?
[01:22:18.200 --> 01:22:20.600]  Yes, absolutely.
[01:22:20.600 --> 01:22:21.600]  Okay.
[01:22:21.600 --> 01:22:27.680]  So if the procedure as laid out in the Code of Criminal Procedure is actually step-by-step
[01:22:27.680 --> 01:22:35.360]  accurate as you described it, at what point does the sworn statement get made?
[01:22:35.360 --> 01:22:39.440]  Because remember, before it goes to the district court to go to a grand jury, there has to
[01:22:39.440 --> 01:22:41.360]  be an information made.
[01:22:41.360 --> 01:22:46.020]  That information has to be attached to the so-called complaint, which at this point is
[01:22:46.020 --> 01:22:47.020]  just verified.
[01:22:47.020 --> 01:22:48.320]  It's not sworn.
[01:22:48.320 --> 01:22:50.280]  That's all it needs at this point.
[01:22:50.280 --> 01:22:53.240]  But that's going up for an indictment, Randy.
[01:22:53.240 --> 01:22:54.240]  Right.
[01:22:54.240 --> 01:22:55.240]  That's going for an indictment.
[01:22:55.240 --> 01:23:03.400]  Once there's an indictment, then in order for the court that you can get the indictment
[01:23:03.400 --> 01:23:11.840]  on hearsay evidence, once the indictment is forwarded to the clerk of the court in accordance
[01:23:11.840 --> 01:23:22.160]  with 20A304, 20A304, they just changed the numbering a couple of years ago.
[01:23:22.160 --> 01:23:23.160]  Okay.
[01:23:23.160 --> 01:23:24.520]  I got a question.
[01:23:24.520 --> 01:23:31.880]  Where do you get the idea that you could get an indictment on hearsay evidence, since when
[01:23:31.880 --> 01:23:38.160]  is actual evidence not submitted to a grand jury that serves as probable cause grounds
[01:23:38.160 --> 01:23:41.460]  for an indictment rather than hearsay?
[01:23:41.460 --> 01:23:49.200]  Because actual evidence is presented to a grand jury does not mean it must be.
[01:23:49.200 --> 01:23:53.400]  All the grand jury needs for jurisdiction is a complaint.
[01:23:53.400 --> 01:23:54.560]  Yeah.
[01:23:54.560 --> 01:23:59.880]  But by the same token, that means that anybody can simply accuse somebody of something and
[01:23:59.880 --> 01:24:05.120]  have them prosecuted for it without any predetermination of whether or not it's true.
[01:24:05.120 --> 01:24:06.260]  Exactly right.
[01:24:06.260 --> 01:24:09.400]  That was the point I was making about Texas.
[01:24:09.400 --> 01:24:11.600]  That's how Texas is different.
[01:24:11.600 --> 01:24:22.740]  And that's why 20A.304 says that if you get an indictment before the person's been arrested,
[01:24:22.740 --> 01:24:26.880]  that means there hasn't been an examining trial.
[01:24:26.880 --> 01:24:35.960]  And 20A.304 says that after the grand jury has voted, the grand jury shall come before
[01:24:35.960 --> 01:24:40.440]  the court with a quorum of the grand jury present and the foreman shall read the fact
[01:24:40.440 --> 01:24:46.960]  of the true bill into the record and the clerk shall make notes in the minutes of the court
[01:24:46.960 --> 01:24:54.040]  unless the person has not been arrested, in which case she shall not make notes in the
[01:24:54.040 --> 01:24:58.040]  minutes of the court, which shall issue a capious.
[01:24:58.040 --> 01:25:01.440]  So the true bill is still a true bill.
[01:25:01.440 --> 01:25:07.280]  It doesn't become an indictment until it's registered with the court.
[01:25:07.280 --> 01:25:12.080]  And that doesn't happen until the person's been arrested, which presupposes that they're
[01:25:12.080 --> 01:25:18.000]  taken directly to the nearest magistrate and an examining trial is held, and all those
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:22.480]  documents are delivered up and sent to the grand jury.
[01:25:22.480 --> 01:25:25.560]  Yeah, none of that I'm arguing with.
[01:25:25.560 --> 01:25:29.760]  I agree that that's the way it's laid out in the Code of Criminal Procedure, okay?
[01:25:29.760 --> 01:25:30.760]  I agree.
[01:25:30.760 --> 01:25:37.880]  Wait a minute, then hold on one, from there, then the district court is to certify the
[01:25:37.880 --> 01:25:46.760]  indictment to whichever court it goes to, and now that court has jurisdiction.
[01:25:46.760 --> 01:25:54.480]  Once they have jurisdiction, they can't move ahead without personal knowledge.
[01:25:54.480 --> 01:26:01.640]  You can get the indictment on hearsay, but you can't prosecute on hearsay.
[01:26:01.640 --> 01:26:07.360]  So once it goes to the court of jurisdiction, then they have to have the affidavit.
[01:26:07.360 --> 01:26:11.000]  Okay, but here's my point.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:15.440]  They prosecute on hearsay every damn day.
[01:26:15.440 --> 01:26:17.400]  Yes they do.
[01:26:17.400 --> 01:26:22.760]  Every single complaint that goes in front of a municipal or justice court is hearsay.
[01:26:22.760 --> 01:26:25.320]  It's based upon someone's belief.
[01:26:25.320 --> 01:26:28.280]  It's not based upon facts and understanding of the law.
[01:26:28.280 --> 01:26:29.280]  Never is.
[01:26:29.280 --> 01:26:31.880]  Yeah, that's not even admissible.
[01:26:31.880 --> 01:26:36.800]  So that right there is a due process violation because it's unequal application and protection
[01:26:36.800 --> 01:26:37.800]  of the law.
[01:26:37.800 --> 01:26:38.800]  All right?
[01:26:38.800 --> 01:26:43.440]  You're getting one set of complaints charged with a certain type of crime differently than
[01:26:43.440 --> 01:26:45.640]  someone charged with another type of crime.
[01:26:45.640 --> 01:26:51.480]  It's not equal application and protection of the law, plus the fact none of the process.
[01:26:51.480 --> 01:26:55.960]  Now you and I have spent how many years now tearing apart the code of criminal procedure
[01:26:55.960 --> 01:26:59.560]  to prove it doesn't work the way it's written.
[01:26:59.560 --> 01:27:03.900]  And now you're going to quote it to me back into some forward saying this is the process.
[01:27:03.900 --> 01:27:10.040]  And here I'm trying to tell you that the process they've laid out is incorrect because it does
[01:27:10.040 --> 01:27:13.840]  not comply with the state constitution.
[01:27:13.840 --> 01:27:19.440]  Complaints do not exist in the state constitution anywhere.
[01:27:19.440 --> 01:27:22.640]  The complaint only exists within the code of criminal procedure.
[01:27:22.640 --> 01:27:29.600]  Yeah, but the constitution does not have to designate every step in procedure.
[01:27:29.600 --> 01:27:35.400]  That's where, no, it doesn't have to dictate procedure, but where it dictates certain instruments
[01:27:35.400 --> 01:27:41.480]  are required to not only create jurisdiction, but to maintain it, they have to be there.
[01:27:41.480 --> 01:27:49.240]  Well, they're not, they're not because here, if you read, and by the way, the Texas constitution
[01:27:49.240 --> 01:27:52.520]  only allows the quashing of an indictment.
[01:27:52.520 --> 01:27:55.920]  Now the code of criminal procedure allows you to quash more than that.
[01:27:55.920 --> 01:28:00.360]  But the Texas constitution only speaks of quashing indictments in the county, not the
[01:28:00.360 --> 01:28:05.360]  information, but we can quash the information, can't we?
[01:28:05.360 --> 01:28:06.360]  Yes.
[01:28:06.360 --> 01:28:07.360]  Okay.
[01:28:07.360 --> 01:28:14.120]  So, but it says in either case that if the indictment be quashed in the county, the accused
[01:28:14.120 --> 01:28:21.660]  shall not be released, but held based upon a sworn statement.
[01:28:21.660 --> 01:28:27.680]  So even though the indictment or information can be quashed, the sworn statement is still
[01:28:27.680 --> 01:28:34.440]  enough to prosecute on to maintain jurisdiction, but it is not enough to establish it.
[01:28:34.440 --> 01:28:40.440]  The indictment or information is the only one that can invest the court with jurisdiction.
[01:28:40.440 --> 01:28:46.280]  The sworn statement is required to maintain it if either of those instruments gets quashed.
[01:28:46.280 --> 01:28:47.280]  Okay.
[01:28:47.280 --> 01:28:49.280]  And that actually makes sense.
[01:28:49.280 --> 01:28:54.160]  It does, but it doesn't when that sworn statement isn't a sworn statement.
[01:28:54.160 --> 01:28:58.520]  It's only a verified document on somebody's belief of crap.
[01:28:58.520 --> 01:28:59.520]  Right.
[01:28:59.520 --> 01:29:03.520]  When it gets to the trial court, they have to have a sworn statement.
[01:29:03.520 --> 01:29:05.760]  They never do.
[01:29:05.760 --> 01:29:09.280]  That's, that's different issue.
[01:29:09.280 --> 01:29:14.440]  They don't do it right, but we're talking about what the law requires.
[01:29:14.440 --> 01:29:21.800]  The trial court needs a sworn statement because they can't operate on hearsay.
[01:29:21.800 --> 01:29:31.160]  And that's why after the indictment and the indictment invests the trial court with jurisdiction,
[01:29:31.160 --> 01:29:38.080]  but the trial court cannot move ahead until they've done their investigation and gotten
[01:29:38.080 --> 01:29:41.000]  a sworn affidavit.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:48.920]  Yeah, but even the prosecuting attorney is basing his information upon hearsay in the
[01:29:48.920 --> 01:29:50.400]  verified complaint.
[01:29:50.400 --> 01:29:54.200]  Yes, he is.
[01:29:54.200 --> 01:29:55.920]  And that's a problem in Babu.
[01:29:55.920 --> 01:30:01.560]  Well, I think it's, it gives us access.
[01:30:01.560 --> 01:30:04.880]  A top cybersecurity expert has a warning for America.
[01:30:04.880 --> 01:30:10.560]  If you build an electrical smart grid, the hackers will come and they could cause a catastrophic
[01:30:10.560 --> 01:30:11.560]  blackout.
[01:30:11.560 --> 01:30:16.400]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with the shocking details in a moment.
[01:30:16.400 --> 01:30:18.120]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.120 --> 01:30:21.720]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.720 --> 01:30:26.720]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.720 --> 01:30:31.880]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.880 --> 01:30:34.480]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.480 --> 01:30:40.120]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.120 --> 01:30:41.840]  Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:41.840 --> 01:30:45.960]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.960 --> 01:30:49.900]  Governments love power, so it's only natural they'd want to control the power going into
[01:30:49.900 --> 01:30:52.460]  your home too with a smart grid.
[01:30:52.460 --> 01:30:56.640]  So they're installing a national network of smart meters to remotely monitor electric
[01:30:56.640 --> 01:30:59.440]  use for efficiency and avoid grid failure.
[01:30:59.440 --> 01:31:04.480]  But cyber security expert David Chalk says not so fast if we make the national power
[01:31:04.480 --> 01:31:08.760]  grid controllable through the web, hackers will have a field day.
[01:31:08.760 --> 01:31:13.560]  Working remotely, they could tap in and black out the entire nation, leaving us vulnerable
[01:31:13.560 --> 01:31:15.200]  to our enemies.
[01:31:15.200 --> 01:31:19.040]  I've long opposed smart meters for privacy and health reasons.
[01:31:19.040 --> 01:31:23.520]  The catastrophic failures caused by hackers, there's nothing smart about that.
[01:31:23.520 --> 01:31:31.540]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.540 --> 01:31:36.920]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:36.920 --> 01:31:39.120]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.120 --> 01:31:43.960]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.960 --> 01:31:46.600]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.600 --> 01:31:49.440]  And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.440 --> 01:31:50.880]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.880 --> 01:31:51.880]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.880 --> 01:31:53.240]  I'm in New York City Correction Office.
[01:31:53.240 --> 01:31:54.240]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.240 --> 01:31:55.240]  I'm a father.
[01:31:55.240 --> 01:31:56.240]  Who lost his son.
[01:31:56.240 --> 01:31:57.240]  We're Americans.
[01:31:57.240 --> 01:31:58.520]  And we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.520 --> 01:32:01.200]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.200 --> 01:32:06.040]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[01:32:06.040 --> 01:32:09.840]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[01:32:09.840 --> 01:32:13.960]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.960 --> 01:32:17.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:21.040]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:21.040 --> 01:32:25.280]  The courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[01:32:25.280 --> 01:32:26.280]  through due process.
[01:32:26.280 --> 01:32:30.280]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[01:32:30.280 --> 01:32:34.040]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[01:32:34.040 --> 01:32:36.440]  is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.440 --> 01:32:40.440]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[01:32:40.440 --> 01:32:41.760]  ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.760 --> 01:32:44.960]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[01:32:44.960 --> 01:32:49.520]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[01:32:49.520 --> 01:32:51.800]  documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.800 --> 01:32:55.760]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.760 --> 01:33:00.880]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:00.880 --> 01:33:24.760]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:24.760 --> 01:33:33.160]  I see tools of ingenuity, to use against the workers of iniquity, tools of massive capability,
[01:33:33.160 --> 01:33:41.160]  available for all eternity, they come from natural divinity, with steadfast roots and
[01:33:41.160 --> 01:33:42.160]  authenticity.
[01:33:42.160 --> 01:33:51.160]  I see tools to regain dignity, to rebuild the creed and the visage, and I say, truth
[01:33:51.160 --> 01:34:03.160]  in nature must be justice, I believe, truth in nature must be justice, and love is a daunting
[01:34:03.160 --> 01:34:11.160]  task, at least I got the peace and seed, I said more to just take off the silly mask,
[01:34:11.160 --> 01:34:17.160]  and in the light of day we all will pass, and we'll be tools of ingenuity, to use against
[01:34:17.160 --> 01:34:45.160]  the workers of iniquity, tools of ingenuity, to use against the workers of iniquity.
[01:34:45.160 --> 01:34:52.520]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, ruleoflawradio on this, the 28th day of April
[01:34:52.520 --> 01:34:58.160]  2025, our four hour, Friday, our four hour info marathon.
[01:34:58.160 --> 01:35:01.160]  Wait, wait, wait, sorry.
[01:35:01.160 --> 01:35:03.400]  You what?
[01:35:03.400 --> 01:35:04.400]  It's 2023.
[01:35:04.400 --> 01:35:07.400]  What'd I say?
[01:35:07.400 --> 01:35:13.080]  It's okay, you're getting a little ahead of yourself.
[01:35:13.080 --> 01:35:17.080]  Did I say 2028?
[01:35:17.080 --> 01:35:21.560]  You said 2025, but that's all right, it's only a couple of years out.
[01:35:21.560 --> 01:35:27.560]  I think you made that up.
[01:35:27.560 --> 01:35:33.640]  You probably told me it was 25, anyway, he's always doing that to me, because he knows
[01:35:33.640 --> 01:35:35.760]  I'm old and senile.
[01:35:35.760 --> 01:35:43.400]  Okay, we were talking to Shane in New York, and we got kind of carried away on you there,
[01:35:43.400 --> 01:35:44.400]  Shane.
[01:35:44.400 --> 01:35:48.760]  Yeah, I just wanted to say about Eddie Craig, is he still there?
[01:35:48.760 --> 01:35:50.240]  Yeah, he is.
[01:35:50.240 --> 01:35:54.160]  Yeah, hey, how you doing?
[01:35:54.160 --> 01:35:57.720]  I really love all the stuff you've done over the years, but I just want to ask your opinion,
[01:35:57.720 --> 01:36:01.160]  if you don't mind making an opinion on this.
[01:36:01.160 --> 01:36:04.360]  What's your thoughts on Mark Steven?
[01:36:04.360 --> 01:36:07.160]  I try not to have any.
[01:36:07.160 --> 01:36:08.160]  Okay.
[01:36:08.160 --> 01:36:13.040]  The problem with Mark Stevens' approach is Mark Stevens doesn't follow through to a logical
[01:36:13.040 --> 01:36:14.040]  conclusion.
[01:36:14.040 --> 01:36:18.840]  His challenge makes no sense in an organized society, it absolutely doesn't.
[01:36:18.840 --> 01:36:25.400]  I've addressed it before, but when you agree to live within the confines of society, and
[01:36:25.400 --> 01:36:30.800]  you take the benefits from that society, there are certain rules in play that go along with
[01:36:30.800 --> 01:36:32.520]  that.
[01:36:32.520 --> 01:36:37.440]  One of those, and for him to just simply say, where's your jurisdiction over me in an organized
[01:36:37.440 --> 01:36:43.160]  society, well, again, there's a logical way to look at that.
[01:36:43.160 --> 01:36:48.080]  If everybody could simply say, I'm not a part of your society, therefore you have no jurisdiction
[01:36:48.080 --> 01:36:52.040]  over me, how could we punish a murderer that used that as a defense?
[01:36:52.040 --> 01:36:58.960]  Yeah, and in that case, get your behind off my roadways that I paid for.
[01:36:58.960 --> 01:37:05.320]  See, there's a misstep in his logic there for that.
[01:37:05.320 --> 01:37:10.600]  Now when it comes to the argument, I am not someone to whom the law you're attempting
[01:37:10.600 --> 01:37:17.860]  to apply actually does apply, that's a separate standard and a separate issue from the way
[01:37:17.860 --> 01:37:24.160]  Mark tries to couch the whole argument, because his whole argument is saying they lack jurisdiction
[01:37:24.160 --> 01:37:25.160]  for anything.
[01:37:25.160 --> 01:37:29.960]  Well, if that's the case, you couldn't prosecute a murderer that said that in his defense.
[01:37:29.960 --> 01:37:36.000]  You couldn't prosecute a rapist, a pedophile, or anybody else for any other crime, if all
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:39.960]  they got to do is say, I'm not a part of your society, you can't touch me.
[01:37:39.960 --> 01:37:44.800]  And isn't his whole premise, isn't he the one that keeps chanting about, prove that
[01:37:44.800 --> 01:37:48.120]  the constitution applies to me?
[01:37:48.120 --> 01:37:50.320]  Yes, as well as your...
[01:37:50.320 --> 01:37:53.200]  No, it doesn't apply to him.
[01:37:53.200 --> 01:37:55.320]  It never speaks to us.
[01:37:55.320 --> 01:38:01.920]  Well, you know, can I just say one more thing and I'll let you guys go here is, I listened
[01:38:01.920 --> 01:38:03.760]  to him maybe about a couple of years ago.
[01:38:03.760 --> 01:38:07.760]  He also believes that Joe Biden got 81 million votes and Trump did lose.
[01:38:07.760 --> 01:38:10.440]  And I said after that, I said, that's it, I'm done.
[01:38:10.440 --> 01:38:11.440]  Yeah.
[01:38:11.440 --> 01:38:17.320]  Well, like I say, I've read his book, I've watched his videos, I've listened to his recorded
[01:38:17.320 --> 01:38:24.360]  phone calls, and I'm not saying that if he understood the actual law, he couldn't be
[01:38:24.360 --> 01:38:29.440]  helpful, but just simply challenging jurisdiction the way that he does.
[01:38:29.440 --> 01:38:33.880]  Not that jurisdiction shouldn't be challenged, exactly the opposite, but there is a correct
[01:38:33.880 --> 01:38:36.680]  way to do it and a correct way to make the argument.
[01:38:36.680 --> 01:38:39.960]  And then there's the Mark Stevens way.
[01:38:39.960 --> 01:38:52.160]  Yes, and it's axiomatic that when you place yourself within the geographical boundaries
[01:38:52.160 --> 01:38:59.480]  of jurisdiction, you bind yourself to the jurisdiction, you just can't get around that
[01:38:59.480 --> 01:39:00.480]  one.
[01:39:00.480 --> 01:39:04.240]  Addie, could I ask one more question?
[01:39:04.240 --> 01:39:05.240]  Mm-hmm.
[01:39:05.240 --> 01:39:11.560]  Yeah, if you have a driver's license, New York, Texas, whatever, do you waive your rights
[01:39:11.560 --> 01:39:13.960]  on challenging jurisdiction?
[01:39:13.960 --> 01:39:21.200]  No, because the license has a time of use and not a time of use.
[01:39:21.200 --> 01:39:24.320]  It only applies under a certain set of conditions.
[01:39:24.320 --> 01:39:30.160]  If those conditions are not applicable in that moment, the license is not being used.
[01:39:30.160 --> 01:39:34.840]  Therefore, any waiver you made is irrelevant for what you're doing in the moment.
[01:39:34.840 --> 01:39:35.840]  Right.
[01:39:35.840 --> 01:39:36.840]  That makes sense.
[01:39:36.840 --> 01:39:37.840]  Yes.
[01:39:37.840 --> 01:39:51.840]  I mean, I have a license on my vehicle, and I can operate in commerce if I want to, but
[01:39:51.840 --> 01:39:55.240]  I'm not necessarily operating in commerce.
[01:39:55.240 --> 01:39:59.560]  Yeah, it's what I keep telling people about a fishing license.
[01:39:59.560 --> 01:40:02.280]  I can go to the grocery store and buy fish.
[01:40:02.280 --> 01:40:07.760]  I don't have to have my fishing license on me to go to the grocery store and buy fish,
[01:40:07.760 --> 01:40:12.080]  and possession of the fish does not place me within an area where I have to produce
[01:40:12.080 --> 01:40:14.600]  that license on demand.
[01:40:14.600 --> 01:40:22.920]  Thus, if I go out in a boat on a lake and I'm catching a live fish, then if I intend
[01:40:22.920 --> 01:40:26.300]  to resell that fish, I have to have the license.
[01:40:26.300 --> 01:40:31.200]  If I intend to make a profit from that fish, I have to have a license, because profiting
[01:40:31.200 --> 01:40:36.040]  off of a public resource is a privileged activity.
[01:40:36.040 --> 01:40:41.560]  Thus, they have the right to govern it under the police power.
[01:40:41.560 --> 01:40:48.040]  Eddie, let me ask, I got one more, and I'll let you go here.
[01:40:48.040 --> 01:40:54.000]  If you get a speeding ticket or seatbelt or some kind of traffic violation, and you plead
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:41:00.200]  guilty to a, let's say a traffic ticket, $75 traffic ticket, obviously you waive your right
[01:41:00.200 --> 01:41:02.040]  to sue, correct?
[01:41:02.040 --> 01:41:07.680]  Absolutely, because that's a proper conviction if you plead guilty and you can't sue for
[01:41:07.680 --> 01:41:13.440]  a conviction, not unless there was a separate issue involved and had a rights violation
[01:41:13.440 --> 01:41:17.560]  associated with it, such as even though you lost a criminal case, there's still excessive
[01:41:17.560 --> 01:41:18.800]  force involved.
[01:41:18.800 --> 01:41:21.800]  That would be a separate issue.
[01:41:21.800 --> 01:41:25.840]  On the flip side of the coin, if it was a criminal situation and you did win your case
[01:41:25.840 --> 01:41:29.880]  based on the merits, but they never dismissed it that you were innocent or guilty, they
[01:41:29.880 --> 01:41:37.200]  just dismiss it based on maybe speedy trial, can you still nail for malicious prosecution?
[01:41:37.200 --> 01:41:43.840]  It depends upon, the Supreme Court has ruled, yes, you can.
[01:41:43.840 --> 01:41:49.840]  If the decision of the case results favorably to you, even if it's a dismissal, then you
[01:41:49.840 --> 01:41:53.220]  can now sue for malicious prosecution.
[01:41:53.220 --> 01:41:55.960]  That's a fairly recent Supreme Court case.
[01:41:55.960 --> 01:41:59.000]  I think it was last year.
[01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:05.840]  Well, I think it was actually two or three years ago, but-
[01:42:05.840 --> 01:42:06.840]  There also was-
[01:42:06.840 --> 01:42:09.040]  Brandon doesn't know what year it is.
[01:42:09.040 --> 01:42:10.040]  Exactly.
[01:42:10.040 --> 01:42:13.480]  It was two years in the future, a minute ago, so I'm not surprised.
[01:42:13.480 --> 01:42:20.040]  That backs us up two years, I'm on, I'll shut up now.
[01:42:20.040 --> 01:42:25.600]  Anyway, there was a case called Thompson, United States Supreme Court back in March
[01:42:25.600 --> 01:42:35.640]  of 2023, that basically said that if the defendant won his case with no convictions, he can move
[01:42:35.640 --> 01:42:41.680]  forward on malicious prosecution, but the thing is, it seems like the judges do whatever
[01:42:41.680 --> 01:42:42.680]  they want.
[01:42:42.680 --> 01:42:45.000]  You said it was March of 2023?
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:46.000]  Yes.
[01:42:46.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  You noticed that.
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:48.000]  Okay.
[01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:50.320]  Now, yeah, but that's just it.
[01:42:50.320 --> 01:42:54.720]  I know that's not when that case was originally decided.
[01:42:54.720 --> 01:42:58.040]  What court pinned that opinion you're reading from?
[01:42:58.040 --> 01:43:01.040]  United States Supreme Court, United States Supreme Court Thompson.
[01:43:01.040 --> 01:43:08.240]  Are they citing a previous Supreme Court precedent in that?
[01:43:08.240 --> 01:43:09.960]  They listed a bunch of cases.
[01:43:09.960 --> 01:43:10.960]  I didn't really-
[01:43:10.960 --> 01:43:17.480]  At the end of that statement, they listed a bunch of cases?
[01:43:17.480 --> 01:43:20.720]  I would have to go look at it again.
[01:43:20.720 --> 01:43:27.920]  I'm thinking that they did, they just referenced their own opinion from a prior time, but I'm
[01:43:27.920 --> 01:43:32.320]  fairly certain that opinion, that ruling is more than a month old.
[01:43:32.320 --> 01:43:34.920]  I've known about that for a while.
[01:43:34.920 --> 01:43:35.920]  Okay.
[01:43:35.920 --> 01:43:41.560]  Oh, it was last year, I hear this right here, it was last year, I'm sorry.
[01:43:41.560 --> 01:43:47.120]  It was March 2022, yeah, you're right.
[01:43:47.120 --> 01:43:48.120]  Who's exonerated?
[01:43:48.120 --> 01:43:49.120]  Randy Kelton?
[01:43:49.120 --> 01:43:54.520]  Well, again, we have to see if there's other cases cited in that, we'll see.
[01:43:54.520 --> 01:43:55.520]  Okay.
[01:43:55.520 --> 01:44:00.600]  Thank you guys for listening and good night.
[01:44:00.600 --> 01:44:05.480]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:44:05.480 --> 01:44:06.640]  of nutrition.
[01:44:06.640 --> 01:44:11.360]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.360 --> 01:44:17.040]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.040 --> 01:44:23.400]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[01:44:23.400 --> 01:44:25.560]  provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.560 --> 01:44:30.680]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[01:44:30.680 --> 01:44:31.680]  we reject.
[01:44:31.680 --> 01:44:36.880]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[01:44:36.880 --> 01:44:40.080]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:40.080 --> 01:44:46.000]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:47.620]  quality radio.
[01:44:47.620 --> 01:44:51.960]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.960 --> 01:44:57.240]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[01:44:57.240 --> 01:44:58.240]  increase your income.
[01:44:58.240 --> 01:44:59.240]  Order now.
[01:44:59.240 --> 01:45:06.640]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:06.640 --> 01:45:13.360]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[01:45:13.360 --> 01:45:16.400]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.400 --> 01:45:21.120]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:21.120 --> 01:45:25.400]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:25.400 --> 01:45:30.240]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:30.240 --> 01:45:36.080]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:36.080 --> 01:45:41.480]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:41.480 --> 01:45:45.840]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:45.840 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:54.800]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:54.800 --> 01:46:21.600]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:21.600 --> 01:46:44.240]  Okay, we're back.
[01:46:44.240 --> 01:46:57.760]  I made a mistake, and nobody will ever let me hear the end of it.
[01:46:57.760 --> 01:47:01.080]  You shouldn't confuse old guys.
[01:47:01.080 --> 01:47:07.800]  Okay, do you have anything else for us, Shane?
[01:47:07.800 --> 01:47:10.840]  Yeah, 30 seconds to let you guys go.
[01:47:10.840 --> 01:47:12.600]  Eddie, this is for Eddie Craig.
[01:47:12.600 --> 01:47:16.520]  I actually won a case in 2018.
[01:47:16.520 --> 01:47:19.000]  It started in 2016, a simple little traffic case.
[01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:21.720]  I would not give them my ID, and I won the case.
[01:47:21.720 --> 01:47:25.200]  I followed suit, and they said that I burned out the one-year statute of limitations for
[01:47:25.200 --> 01:47:26.200]  malicious prosecution.
[01:47:26.200 --> 01:47:30.840]  So I took it to the state Supreme Court, I went to the fourth department.
[01:47:30.840 --> 01:47:31.840]  It's sitting in Albany.
[01:47:31.840 --> 01:47:38.240]  They denied it too, so I'm going to go to the Supreme Court on a very similar situation
[01:47:38.240 --> 01:47:39.800]  with what we were just talking about.
[01:47:39.800 --> 01:47:42.200]  So I'm waiting for them to file a list of entry.
[01:47:42.200 --> 01:47:46.480]  I'm waiting for them to file a notice of entry, so I can go ahead and do that, because the
[01:47:46.480 --> 01:47:48.000]  90 days has not started.
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:49.360]  They haven't filed a notice of entry.
[01:47:49.360 --> 01:47:52.960]  By the way, in New York, you've got to do a notice of entry before the clock starts
[01:47:52.960 --> 01:47:56.280]  ticking, and they haven't done that, and they've been sitting on it for like two months.
[01:47:56.280 --> 01:47:57.280]  All right.
[01:47:57.280 --> 01:47:58.280]  Well, cool.
[01:47:58.280 --> 01:47:59.280]  I'm glad you have.
[01:47:59.280 --> 01:48:01.280]  There's a lot to talk about.
[01:48:01.280 --> 01:48:03.280]  It was really nice talking to you guys.
[01:48:03.280 --> 01:48:04.280]  Yes, sir.
[01:48:04.280 --> 01:48:05.280]  Thank you, Eddie.
[01:48:05.280 --> 01:48:06.280]  Thanks, Randy.
[01:48:06.280 --> 01:48:07.280]  Yes, sir.
[01:48:07.280 --> 01:48:08.280]  Pick it up, Brett.
[01:48:08.280 --> 01:48:09.280]  I'm having voice issues.
[01:48:09.280 --> 01:48:10.280]  All right.
[01:48:10.280 --> 01:48:14.600]  Well, thanks, Shane.
[01:48:14.600 --> 01:48:18.080]  We're moving on now to John in New York.
[01:48:18.080 --> 01:48:20.080]  Hello again, John.
[01:48:20.080 --> 01:48:27.360]  Well, I caught your note, and Eddie had said something about there was a stipulation somewhere,
[01:48:27.360 --> 01:48:36.720]  and it was the fact that someone else other than the legislature has, and then I...
[01:48:36.720 --> 01:48:37.720]  Yes.
[01:48:37.720 --> 01:48:43.720]  Do a search in your state constitution for municipalities, and then you will find a reference
[01:48:43.720 --> 01:48:50.200]  in there where the municipalities are allowed to make certain local laws for certain things,
[01:48:50.200 --> 01:48:52.240]  but only certain things.
[01:48:52.240 --> 01:48:55.520]  And then you got to see if there's something similar for counties.
[01:48:55.520 --> 01:49:00.620]  Then for anything that falls outside of that cluster of listed things, they have no authority
[01:49:00.620 --> 01:49:01.960]  to write anything.
[01:49:01.960 --> 01:49:05.560]  And again, you look where, say it again?
[01:49:05.560 --> 01:49:07.080]  The state constitution.
[01:49:07.080 --> 01:49:13.440]  You look for the term municipality, and then you look for the term county, two separate
[01:49:13.440 --> 01:49:19.520]  searches to find if they're given authority to create local law for certain things.
[01:49:19.520 --> 01:49:20.520]  Okay.
[01:49:20.520 --> 01:49:27.960]  So, go to the state constitution, put in the search term municipality and county.
[01:49:27.960 --> 01:49:28.960]  Yes.
[01:49:28.960 --> 01:49:37.160]  I just put in municipal because that way I find municipality and municipalities plural.
[01:49:37.160 --> 01:49:41.560]  So if you just put in municipal and you search for that, then you will find the section talking
[01:49:41.560 --> 01:49:49.080]  about where they can do it for certain types of gaming businesses, dog racing, and things
[01:49:49.080 --> 01:49:50.920]  like that.
[01:49:50.920 --> 01:49:52.560]  That's for municipalities.
[01:49:52.560 --> 01:49:57.520]  You may find something similar for counties, but you may want to also double check and
[01:49:57.520 --> 01:50:03.720]  see if they have more than one section authorizing them to make certain kinds of local law.
[01:50:03.720 --> 01:50:09.520]  John, do not put in municipalities and counties.
[01:50:09.520 --> 01:50:12.680]  Do each one in a separate search.
[01:50:12.680 --> 01:50:13.680]  Yes.
[01:50:13.680 --> 01:50:16.920]  Just do municipal as one search.
[01:50:16.920 --> 01:50:22.080]  And then after you get everything you can find on municipal, then go back and do a separate
[01:50:22.080 --> 01:50:28.720]  search for county and just do count instead.
[01:50:28.720 --> 01:50:32.000]  That will get you county and counties plural.
[01:50:32.000 --> 01:50:33.000]  Got it.
[01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:34.960]  Oh, I didn't realize that.
[01:50:34.960 --> 01:50:35.960]  Thank you.
[01:50:35.960 --> 01:50:36.960]  Very good.
[01:50:36.960 --> 01:50:48.960]  Well, you have to admit that Eddie Craig is one fart smeller and a deep stinker.
[01:50:48.960 --> 01:51:00.480]  Okay, John, how much do you have?
[01:51:00.480 --> 01:51:02.040]  You got seven more minutes.
[01:51:02.040 --> 01:51:06.360]  Do something really exciting and insightful for seven minutes.
[01:51:06.360 --> 01:51:07.360]  Okay.
[01:51:07.360 --> 01:51:16.640]  Let's see if I can remember the recent things with regard to COVID, things that I knew about
[01:51:16.640 --> 01:51:23.560]  three years ago, they're coming to the surface again now and as time goes on, more and more
[01:51:23.560 --> 01:51:35.280]  is learned and more and more people are building on the investigative abilities of previous
[01:51:35.280 --> 01:51:36.280]  doctors.
[01:51:36.280 --> 01:51:37.280]  Okay.
[01:51:37.280 --> 01:51:38.280]  Hold on.
[01:51:38.280 --> 01:51:39.280]  Hold on.
[01:51:39.280 --> 01:51:41.920]  What do you know about Dr. Martin and what he's doing?
[01:51:41.920 --> 01:51:44.440]  Dr. David Martin?
[01:51:44.440 --> 01:51:45.440]  Yes.
[01:51:45.440 --> 01:51:58.160]  Well, he, the last I knew, I think he was going to bring lawsuits and lawsuits were
[01:51:58.160 --> 01:52:04.960]  over the things that I reported to you on a previous show, maybe six months ago.
[01:52:04.960 --> 01:52:16.440]  And basically what he said, he was attacking the, the COVID vaccine was not a brainchild
[01:52:16.440 --> 01:52:20.800]  of the pharmaceutical company.
[01:52:20.800 --> 01:52:25.480]  DARPA was really in charge of that and other government agencies.
[01:52:25.480 --> 01:52:30.120]  The pharmaceutical companies were just a cover story.
[01:52:30.120 --> 01:52:31.880]  They were just a cover.
[01:52:31.880 --> 01:52:35.640]  The government was really in charge of that.
[01:52:35.640 --> 01:52:38.320]  And how do you know it was a fraud?
[01:52:38.320 --> 01:52:40.880]  The whole thing was a setup.
[01:52:40.880 --> 01:52:45.680]  I don't mean it was a fraud that the virus wasn't killing people, but the virus, actually
[01:52:45.680 --> 01:52:49.800]  when you got the virus and if you didn't go to that, did not go to the hospital, your
[01:52:49.800 --> 01:53:01.800]  chances of survival overall were 89.85 or 99.75% sweetie, no, no, no, no, no, sweetie.
[01:53:01.800 --> 01:53:06.200]  Um, hey, another word, you got to stop talking like that.
[01:53:06.200 --> 01:53:07.680]  Are you talking to Randy?
[01:53:07.680 --> 01:53:08.680]  Yeah.
[01:53:08.680 --> 01:53:11.720]  When I'm on the air, we only do that when we get off the air.
[01:53:11.720 --> 01:53:21.800]  No, no, that was the little kitty was going to knock a box on herself.
[01:53:21.800 --> 01:53:27.320]  So I had to, I had to tell her, no, no, sweetie, no, no, Randy and I are not an item.
[01:53:27.320 --> 01:53:34.520]  Don't worry anyway.
[01:53:34.520 --> 01:53:38.520]  So Dr. David Martin, I'm not familiar with what he's been doing the last few weeks.
[01:53:38.520 --> 01:53:44.560]  I'm going to look them up tonight and then I might have a report for you, but he is brilliant.
[01:53:44.560 --> 01:53:46.600]  That man is brilliant.
[01:53:46.600 --> 01:53:51.920]  And he was going through and showing where their weak spots are.
[01:53:51.920 --> 01:53:57.400]  See the pharmaceutical companies think that that law protects them from lawsuits, but
[01:53:57.400 --> 01:53:59.600]  I don't think it does.
[01:53:59.600 --> 01:54:00.600]  Why?
[01:54:00.600 --> 01:54:08.000]  Because first of all, the vaccine was never approved by the FDA.
[01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:13.480]  And for a while, the media said it was, but it wasn't.
[01:54:13.480 --> 01:54:20.880]  That was just the lame stream media, the prostitutes who are in bed with pharma and corporations
[01:54:20.880 --> 01:54:26.640]  and the communists and the Democrats who are just communists at heart.
[01:54:26.640 --> 01:54:34.680]  Basically what he said goes something like this, I'll just summarize it.
[01:54:34.680 --> 01:54:38.960]  First of all, there was no informed consent.
[01:54:38.960 --> 01:54:45.840]  When they had the vials of vaccine that came, you know, the boxes had a insert that came
[01:54:45.840 --> 01:54:51.880]  with the vial of vaccine and that vial of vaccine did not have a printed insert.
[01:54:51.880 --> 01:54:54.780]  It had a blank piece of paper.
[01:54:54.780 --> 01:55:00.760]  And since that vaccine was not approved as an official safe approval, well they said
[01:55:00.760 --> 01:55:07.120]  safe and effective, yeah, killing people, because they didn't approve it and because
[01:55:07.120 --> 01:55:13.680]  they didn't have an insert that told what was in it, they violated federal law.
[01:55:13.680 --> 01:55:20.000]  And in so doing, I think they opened themselves up for a lawsuit, but they don't want you
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:22.080]  to know that.
[01:55:22.080 --> 01:55:27.840]  So they're going to say, well, we've got that law, 1986, it prevents any liability,
[01:55:27.840 --> 01:55:29.400]  you know, we can't be sued.
[01:55:29.400 --> 01:55:30.400]  Yeah.
[01:55:30.400 --> 01:55:32.480]  Well, first of all, the government was in charge of that.
[01:55:32.480 --> 01:55:36.760]  DARPA was in charge for one government agency.
[01:55:36.760 --> 01:55:40.980]  And there's a lot more to it.
[01:55:40.980 --> 01:55:48.600]  People should go on Dr. Vladimir Zelenko's website if it's still up, because the man
[01:55:48.600 --> 01:55:50.720]  just recently died.
[01:55:50.720 --> 01:55:54.440]  He was nominated, I don't know if they gave it to him, but they nominated him for the
[01:55:54.440 --> 01:56:00.120]  Nobel Prize in Medicine because he was the first doctor in North America or in America
[01:56:00.120 --> 01:56:05.840]  to use ivermectin and he saved virtually all of his patients.
[01:56:05.840 --> 01:56:10.160]  Almost none of his patients died by using ivermectin.
[01:56:10.160 --> 01:56:12.240]  Ivermectin is not just horse pay.
[01:56:12.240 --> 01:56:18.600]  It's used, there's a hospital in Canada that uses it for brain cancer in conjunction probably
[01:56:18.600 --> 01:56:19.600]  with chemo.
[01:56:19.600 --> 01:56:25.520]  And it seems to be very effective at brain cancer or somewhat effective.
[01:56:25.520 --> 01:56:30.600]  It tilts the odds in your favor, let's put it that way, in a person's favor.
[01:56:30.600 --> 01:56:34.640]  And there's a whole lot more that I could tell you, you have no idea the things that
[01:56:34.640 --> 01:56:38.680]  I uncovered in 64 years of doing this.
[01:56:38.680 --> 01:56:45.960]  The things that I uncovered, like for example, in 1993, Einstein College in New York City
[01:56:45.960 --> 01:56:51.160]  discovered that a very minute, and Randy will appreciate this because he's an engineer,
[01:56:51.160 --> 01:56:59.400]  a very tiny electric current, a very tiny voltage, and a very tiny current together
[01:56:59.400 --> 01:57:07.000]  will stun, not kill, but stun HIV and render it useless.
[01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:08.880]  But did you ever hear of anything like that?
[01:57:08.880 --> 01:57:11.960]  No, of course not.
[01:57:11.960 --> 01:57:18.920]  Things like muscular dystrophy was cured in the 1940 by veterinarians.
[01:57:18.920 --> 01:57:21.560]  And the things I'm going to tell you, you're going to think I'm wacko.
[01:57:21.560 --> 01:57:26.180]  That's why when I first used to call the show, poor Randy thought I was nutso.
[01:57:26.180 --> 01:57:31.540]  But what he didn't understand was, and what most people didn't know, was I'm getting
[01:57:31.540 --> 01:57:33.680]  my information from very good sources.
[01:57:33.680 --> 01:57:37.240]  Plus, I've been doing this 64 years of my life.
[01:57:37.240 --> 01:57:41.000]  And you want to know what the cure for muscular dystrophy is?
[01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:46.640]  Vitamin E and selenium, of course in the right dosage, vitamin E and selenium.
[01:57:46.640 --> 01:57:51.800]  And they found that out by horses and livestock that they had to cure in the 1940s with white
[01:57:51.800 --> 01:57:55.800]  muscle disease, which is the same thing only in animals.
[01:57:55.800 --> 01:58:01.800]  So all kinds of things that I've run across, you wouldn't believe.
[01:58:01.800 --> 01:58:03.800]  Write a book.
[01:58:03.800 --> 01:58:07.120]  Well, people have told me that before.
[01:58:07.120 --> 01:58:09.360]  But I'm just reporting what the experts are saying.
[01:58:09.360 --> 01:58:11.600]  I didn't do the research.
[01:58:11.600 --> 01:58:12.600]  That's okay.
[01:58:12.600 --> 01:58:13.600]  Write a book.
[01:58:13.600 --> 01:58:16.760]  Accumulate it all into one place.
[01:58:16.760 --> 01:58:19.480]  We are just about out of time.
[01:58:19.480 --> 01:58:20.800]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:20.800 --> 01:58:23.920]  This time we really are out of time.
[01:58:23.920 --> 01:58:28.200]  They don't get to laugh at me like we did last time.
[01:58:28.200 --> 01:58:29.200]  I hurt my feelings.
[01:58:29.200 --> 01:58:32.000]  Oh, we would never do such a thing.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:33.360]  You didn't hurt my feelings.
[01:58:33.360 --> 01:58:35.560]  I only got one, so you hurt my feelings.
[01:58:35.560 --> 01:58:38.200]  Yeah, I never joke about Randy on the air.
[01:58:38.200 --> 01:58:42.480]  Mother Nature did a better job than I could ever hope for.
[01:58:42.480 --> 01:58:43.480]  Thank you.
[01:58:43.480 --> 01:58:48.800]  We'll be back next week on our regular two-hour show and four-hour info marathon.
[01:58:48.800 --> 01:58:50.640]  Good night.
[01:58:50.640 --> 01:58:56.720]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.720 --> 01:58:57.920]  Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.920 --> 01:59:02.880]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:02.880 --> 01:59:08.520]  says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.520 --> 01:59:11.840]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.840 --> 01:59:20.800]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.800 --> 01:59:26.320]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus
[01:59:26.320 --> 01:59:30.360]  charts and maps, and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.360 --> 01:59:32.900]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.900 --> 01:59:41.280]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.280 --> 01:59:51.480]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.480 --> 01:59:52.480]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.480 --> 01:59:54.480]  You found it.
[01:59:54.480 --> 01:59:56.720]  Go to grossradionetwork.com.