[00:00.000 --> 00:05.320]  The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution.
[00:05.320 --> 00:09.360]  They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect.
[00:09.360 --> 00:10.800]  Our liberty depends on it.
[00:10.800 --> 00:14.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember
[00:14.760 --> 00:16.840]  your First Amendment rights.
[00:16.840 --> 00:18.440]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:18.440 --> 00:22.040]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.040 --> 00:26.800]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:26.800 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:33.000]  Privacy.
[00:33.000 --> 00:34.560]  It's worth hanging on to.
[00:34.560 --> 00:38.840]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[00:38.840 --> 00:42.400]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:42.400 --> 00:44.720]  Start over with Startpage.
[00:44.720 --> 00:46.440]  Spar.
[00:46.440 --> 00:47.680]  It's what fighters do.
[00:47.680 --> 00:50.720]  It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment.
[00:50.720 --> 00:54.360]  If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to spar with you.
[00:54.360 --> 01:01.480]  Spar with an extra P. S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly,
[01:01.480 --> 01:02.840]  and R for religion.
[01:02.840 --> 01:06.960]  Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press,
[01:06.960 --> 01:08.440]  assembly, and religion.
[01:08.440 --> 01:10.800]  But petition for redress is another matter.
[01:10.800 --> 01:14.520]  We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
[01:14.520 --> 01:18.040]  It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell out
[01:18.040 --> 01:20.680]  the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail.
[01:20.680 --> 01:22.640]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:22.640 --> 01:25.320]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:25.320 --> 01:36.480]  Pressure, we usually associate it with stress and negativity, but sometimes a bit of pressure
[01:36.480 --> 01:37.480]  can be healing.
[01:37.480 --> 01:41.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you how conditions like nausea can
[01:41.500 --> 01:46.480]  be cured using the traditional Chinese therapy known as acupressure.
[01:46.480 --> 01:48.080]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:48.080 --> 01:51.680]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.680 --> 01:56.440]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.440 --> 02:01.480]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.480 --> 02:04.200]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[02:04.200 --> 02:08.480]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[02:08.480 --> 02:12.040]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:12.040 --> 02:16.120]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:16.120 --> 02:20.020]  Acupressure is an ancient practice that uses finger or hand pressure to cure everything
[02:20.020 --> 02:22.160]  from headaches to constipation.
[02:22.160 --> 02:25.540]  The pressure is applied to points known as meridians that are believed to control the
[02:25.540 --> 02:28.320]  flow of energy in the human body.
[02:28.320 --> 02:32.000]  Acupressure offers a simple cure for nausea you might try the next time you get a queasy
[02:32.000 --> 02:34.800]  stomach or a case of motion sickness.
[02:34.800 --> 02:38.000]  Simply apply moderate pressure to the point known as P6.
[02:38.000 --> 02:42.520]  You'll find it on the inside of your wrist, about two fingers width down from your palm.
[02:42.520 --> 02:47.400]  Placing pressure on the P6 point works on the same principle as those pricey anti-nausea
[02:47.400 --> 02:50.920]  wristbands, but this relief is free and always on hand.
[02:50.920 --> 03:20.880]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:20.920 --> 03:42.240]  Okay, folks, I would like to make an announcement.
[03:42.240 --> 03:49.240]  Tomorrow evening at 7 p.m. Central Standard Time, that's Texas time, whatever time zone
[03:49.240 --> 03:53.040]  you may be in, you're going to have to convert it to Texas for what I'm about to say, but
[03:53.040 --> 04:00.720]  7 p.m. Texas time, I'm going to have a meeting, a Zoom meeting with a gentleman by the name
[04:00.720 --> 04:04.080]  of James C. Lovett.
[04:04.080 --> 04:09.760]  Now, the reason we're having this meeting is because Mr. Lovett has used my two and
[04:09.760 --> 04:16.840]  a half hour long Infowars video on his YouTube channel, which I don't have an issue with
[04:16.840 --> 04:27.080]  in and of itself, but he's using my YouTube video to promote something else that he's
[04:27.080 --> 04:29.220]  doing.
[04:29.220 --> 04:37.800]  And what he's doing is he is convincing people to do this, change your status, declare yourself
[04:37.800 --> 04:42.640]  an American or state national or whatever you want to call it, or a national in the
[04:42.640 --> 04:44.640]  United States.
[04:44.640 --> 04:49.520]  He's also doing the accepted for value and all this other kind of stuff.
[04:49.520 --> 04:57.000]  And as all my listeners know, these are things that I do not put any stock in.
[04:57.000 --> 05:03.240]  Having done the research on them, I know what a load of crap they are.
[05:03.240 --> 05:10.360]  But in any case, when I reached out to him to ask him if he would please join me in this
[05:10.360 --> 05:15.100]  meeting and invite whoever he wanted to come in, I'm hoping to get a bunch of his followers
[05:15.100 --> 05:17.600]  to come in there with him.
[05:17.600 --> 05:22.640]  And I've invited my class and I am hereby inviting all of the listeners that wish to
[05:22.640 --> 05:29.240]  participate in this, I can hold up to a hundred people on the current Zoom plan that I have.
[05:29.240 --> 05:31.280]  So it's going to be first come, first served.
[05:31.280 --> 05:35.400]  If we get up to that many people and you don't make it in, it's because you were not in the
[05:35.400 --> 05:38.320]  first 100 to get logged on.
[05:38.320 --> 05:51.400]  So if you want to join this, I need you to send me an email to Eddie eddie at ruleoflawradio.com.
[05:51.400 --> 05:58.880]  Now even if Mr. Lovett does not join us, the meeting is going to take place because I have
[05:58.880 --> 06:02.920]  a link to his video where he's showing my presentation.
[06:02.920 --> 06:04.920]  I have links to his websites.
[06:04.920 --> 06:06.920]  I've gone and looked at his other videos.
[06:06.920 --> 06:16.120]  I've gone and looked at his personal website where he sells the stuff that he sells.
[06:16.120 --> 06:23.320]  And I'm going to discuss what he's doing and why you need to avoid it regardless of his
[06:23.320 --> 06:26.520]  level of participation.
[06:26.520 --> 06:33.520]  That said, it would be a good idea for as many people as possible to be there to hear
[06:33.520 --> 06:38.240]  and see the things that are going to be discussed in this meeting.
[06:38.240 --> 06:44.080]  Because what these people that are promoting this stuff is doing is they are giving out
[06:44.080 --> 06:50.160]  extremely dangerous, bad information.
[06:50.160 --> 06:56.560]  Because the things they're getting people to do requires those people to fill out documents
[06:56.560 --> 07:02.680]  and file them with the federal government and other levels of government.
[07:02.680 --> 07:12.600]  And once those documents are filed, they become a government document period.
[07:12.600 --> 07:20.520]  Once they are a government document, if the government ever looks at them closely and
[07:20.520 --> 07:26.720]  checks up on what these people put into those documents and finds out that what they put
[07:26.720 --> 07:33.520]  into them is 100% false and fraudulent and it has to be because of what he's telling
[07:33.520 --> 07:41.400]  them to do, which is in violation of what the law he's telling them he's relying upon
[07:41.400 --> 07:48.280]  actually applies to the law they're trying to use is the immigration statutes of the
[07:48.280 --> 07:54.600]  federal government, at least in the part referencing the national of the United States or state
[07:54.600 --> 07:55.600]  national.
[07:55.600 --> 07:56.600]  Okay.
[07:56.600 --> 08:05.960]  And the section of law they rely on to make this BS sales pitch to people.
[08:05.960 --> 08:13.200]  The definitions prove that they are either a not reading this law correctly or B if they
[08:13.200 --> 08:19.280]  have read it correctly, they are intentionally deceiving people in order to get money from
[08:19.280 --> 08:26.200]  them to sell them worthless paperwork.
[08:26.200 --> 08:34.000]  And the problem with that, besides these people defrauding other people, is that the ones
[08:34.000 --> 08:42.080]  being defrauded are going to get hurt twice because you see once that paperwork becomes
[08:42.080 --> 08:48.720]  a government record and the government checks it out and finds out it contains false information,
[08:48.720 --> 08:55.700]  who are they going to file the criminal charge against the guy that gave out the bad information
[08:55.700 --> 09:02.720]  and got people to give him money to do it or the person whose signature is on the paperwork
[09:02.720 --> 09:07.320]  they got filed with the government in the first place up, even though it was on the
[09:07.320 --> 09:14.360]  advice of the idiot giving it out in the first place, you kind of see the problem here and
[09:14.360 --> 09:20.560]  why I have such a problem with this folks.
[09:20.560 --> 09:23.360]  I am far from perfect.
[09:23.360 --> 09:26.600]  I don't know everything and heaven help me.
[09:26.600 --> 09:32.640]  I hope I have never given the impression that I do when it comes to this stuff.
[09:32.640 --> 09:38.320]  But one thing I do not do is intentionally mislead people and give them a false sense
[09:38.320 --> 09:45.400]  of what the law says because I give them the opportunity to actually look at it and read
[09:45.400 --> 09:46.700]  it for themselves.
[09:46.700 --> 09:50.300]  This is not something that these people do.
[09:50.300 --> 09:53.120]  They simply convince people, this is how you do it.
[09:53.120 --> 10:00.040]  This is what it says and this is what it means and their explanation does not jive with what
[10:00.040 --> 10:04.080]  the law says.
[10:04.080 --> 10:12.400]  So I am hoping to be able to engage him in a discussion to correct some of this.
[10:12.400 --> 10:17.600]  Once I start doing that, however, I fully expect for him to personally attack me or
[10:17.600 --> 10:25.640]  to leave the conversation and any number of other things besides sit, listen and debate.
[10:25.640 --> 10:32.360]  That being said, at least people on the call will know this guy is not someone that should
[10:32.360 --> 10:38.200]  be listened to and most certainly should not be given money.
[10:38.200 --> 10:45.040]  Now, folks, I know y'all donate to us and you keep us on the air and I'm hoping that's
[10:45.040 --> 10:52.760]  because the information we've given you has been proven reliable more often than not both
[10:52.760 --> 10:57.400]  by your being able to use it and by the fact that you can see for yourself that what we
[10:57.400 --> 11:02.460]  say it says is exactly what it says.
[11:02.460 --> 11:05.940]  These people don't do that.
[11:05.940 --> 11:13.360]  They are giving out their own personal opinion about what the law says and means and they
[11:13.360 --> 11:19.100]  are not relying upon what the law actually says and means at all.
[11:19.100 --> 11:24.000]  They are simply throwing their spin on the wording and played it up like they understood
[11:24.000 --> 11:31.480]  it and I'll aim to prove that they not only don't understand it, they didn't even actually
[11:31.480 --> 11:40.360]  read it and yet they're going to tell the rest of you what you need to do to quote unquote
[11:40.360 --> 11:49.360]  protect your status and make yourself invulnerable to any kind of criminal charge or civil suit
[11:49.360 --> 11:53.400]  or government act of any kind.
[11:53.400 --> 12:00.480]  Now if you already believe that that is actually possible in this country, maybe you should
[12:00.480 --> 12:06.120]  just give them all your money because you're just too gullible anyway and anybody else
[12:06.120 --> 12:11.440]  is going to get it no matter what they do because I'm telling you ladies and gentlemen,
[12:11.440 --> 12:15.160]  there are no silver bullets to this.
[12:15.160 --> 12:17.820]  There aren't.
[12:17.820 --> 12:23.360]  You cannot do what this guy is saying, which is declare yourself a separate independent
[12:23.360 --> 12:35.360]  sovereign nation and make up a man and file some paperwork that declares yourself to be
[12:35.360 --> 12:38.320]  your own sovereign nation.
[12:38.320 --> 12:39.880]  It's stupid.
[12:39.880 --> 12:45.720]  It's idiotic, but it's what they're doing.
[12:45.720 --> 12:58.520]  He even, uh, he took his last name and made his sovereign entity, the nation of, and remember
[12:58.520 --> 13:06.480]  his name, last name is love it and he changed his so-called status to the, I don't know
[13:06.480 --> 13:13.800]  what position he's claiming to hold, but he's declared his own nation of love vetica.
[13:13.800 --> 13:27.400]  His last name added with ICA, okay, love vetica people, I cannot begin to tell you how dangerously
[13:27.400 --> 13:42.040]  stupid this stuff is and how anybody that can actually read the English language, despite
[13:42.040 --> 13:48.520]  the fact that it's legalese English language and not understand by now that you have to
[13:48.520 --> 13:55.040]  look at more than just what the one single statute says, and then you're going to try
[13:55.040 --> 14:00.160]  to explain to someone else what it means when you yourself have never read what the whole
[14:00.160 --> 14:05.640]  thing says in context overall, because you only read the one little thing instead of
[14:05.640 --> 14:09.880]  everything else that goes with it.
[14:09.880 --> 14:12.140]  You deserve whatever bad thing happens to you.
[14:12.140 --> 14:16.000]  If you're that gullible and stupid, okay.
[14:16.000 --> 14:20.340]  It's like the guy that insists he's going to check whether or not a wire is live by
[14:20.340 --> 14:27.920]  sticking it to his tongue and the wire just happens to be a wall outlet plug.
[14:27.920 --> 14:29.680]  Okay.
[14:29.680 --> 14:31.340]  You can tell him all day long.
[14:31.340 --> 14:35.760]  You can take it away from him all day long, but at some point this moron is going to come
[14:35.760 --> 14:40.500]  back and stick that wire to his tongue.
[14:40.500 --> 14:46.800]  So rather than let him come back and do it in secret, stand there and watch him then
[14:46.800 --> 14:52.000]  if he isn't dead after he's done it, you can at least call the ambulance to carry his dumb
[14:52.000 --> 15:01.600]  ass to the hospital and assuming he survives and didn't suffer brain damage.
[15:01.600 --> 15:08.800]  Maybe he learned a lesson and if not, maybe next time the Darwin award will be given out
[15:08.800 --> 15:14.240]  as it well should be.
[15:14.240 --> 15:23.160]  So if you wish to attend this zoom meeting and you don't have to have zoom to attend,
[15:23.160 --> 15:28.440]  you can do it through a web browser, but if you will send me an email to Eddie at rule
[15:28.440 --> 15:39.360]  of law radio.com or yeah, idiot rule of law radio.com, I will email you back with the
[15:39.360 --> 15:46.200]  meeting information so that you can join tomorrow night at 7 p.m. central standard time.
[15:46.200 --> 15:47.560]  Okay.
[15:47.560 --> 15:51.400]  I also invited my friend Dave champion to participate in this.
[15:51.400 --> 15:55.020]  He emailed me back a little bit ago saying he can't promise that he would because he
[15:55.020 --> 15:59.480]  had a lot of things go wrong when his side of things today and has a lot of stuff to
[15:59.480 --> 16:02.600]  do tomorrow to make up for the stuff he wasn't able to get done today.
[16:02.600 --> 16:07.480]  He can't guarantee him guarantee me he will make it, but he said he would try.
[16:07.480 --> 16:11.700]  So if he's there, then that gives me someone else that I know can get up to speed on this
[16:11.700 --> 16:16.000]  information and speak about it intelligently very, very quickly.
[16:16.000 --> 16:20.960]  And I welcome his participation if he is able to make it.
[16:20.960 --> 16:28.300]  That said, these people are dangerous to your wellbeing folks.
[16:28.300 --> 16:30.880]  They are very dangerous to your wellbeing.
[16:30.880 --> 16:37.000]  If you know someone that is buying into this crap, you are really going to want them to
[16:37.000 --> 16:46.080]  come to this meeting tomorrow and listen to what is talked about because they are walking
[16:46.080 --> 16:50.280]  to the edge of a very steep cliff.
[16:50.280 --> 16:57.560]  If they start trying to follow this crap, I call a number 512-646-1984 phones are on.
[16:57.560 --> 16:58.560]  Give us a call.
[16:58.560 --> 16:59.560]  Get in line.
[16:59.560 --> 17:00.560]  Let's go.
[17:00.560 --> 17:05.400]  Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of his
[17:05.400 --> 17:06.400]  word?
[17:06.400 --> 17:11.520]  Tune in to logosradionetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. central time for scripture
[17:11.520 --> 17:17.920]  talk where Nana and her guests discuss the scriptures in accord with 2nd Timothy 2.15.
[17:17.920 --> 17:22.440]  Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly
[17:22.440 --> 17:24.880]  dividing the word of truth.
[17:24.880 --> 17:28.840]  Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark where we'll go verse
[17:28.840 --> 17:32.160]  by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[17:32.160 --> 17:36.800]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine
[17:36.800 --> 17:39.200]  and Christian character development.
[17:39.200 --> 17:43.700]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[17:43.700 --> 17:48.000]  Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[17:48.000 --> 17:50.280]  of our Lord and Savior Jesus.
[17:50.280 --> 17:56.940]  So tune in to scripture talk live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. to inspire and
[17:56.940 --> 18:00.800]  motivate your studies of the scriptures.
[18:00.800 --> 18:05.560]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.560 --> 18:09.560]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirras Proven Method.
[18:09.560 --> 18:14.600]  Michael Mirras and now you can win
[18:14.600 --> 18:15.600]  too.
[18:15.600 --> 18:19.720]  You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.720 --> 18:25.480]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer
[18:25.480 --> 18:30.120]  letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the
[18:30.120 --> 18:34.320]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.320 --> 18:39.440]  The Michael Mirras.
[18:39.440 --> 18:41.360]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.360 --> 18:47.120]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirras banner
[18:47.120 --> 18:50.120]  or email michaelmirras@yahoo.com.
[18:50.120 --> 18:59.080]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt
[18:59.080 --> 19:00.080]  collectors now.
[19:00.080 --> 19:09.080]  If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:09.080 --> 19:22.080]  All right, folks.
[19:22.080 --> 19:23.080]  We are back.
[19:23.080 --> 19:26.800]  This is the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[19:26.800 --> 19:29.840]  It is April 10th, 2023.
[19:29.840 --> 19:32.200]  We are live tonight.
[19:32.200 --> 19:39.320]  Now while we are waiting for callers on the board, again, 512-646-1984 is the call-in
[19:39.320 --> 19:40.320]  number.
[19:40.320 --> 19:41.320]  Give me a call and let's talk.
[19:41.320 --> 19:47.440]  But while we are waiting for someone to do that, I want to go into something that I actually
[19:47.440 --> 19:52.880]  wrote up a while back because when I was still on Facebook, which was the better part of
[19:52.880 --> 19:59.560]  two years ago now, I actually wrote this up at that time and I've tweaked it a little
[19:59.560 --> 20:07.760]  bit off and on since then up until I accidentally discovered this guy's YouTube video of my
[20:07.760 --> 20:10.200]  presentation from Infowars.
[20:10.200 --> 20:16.720]  I don't know exactly what I did to find it, but I pulled it up and he was doing a show
[20:16.720 --> 20:22.600]  presenting information out of my video and then trying to match that up with the crap
[20:22.600 --> 20:28.280]  that he's trying to sell to people.
[20:28.280 --> 20:33.120]  He's even got a video where he shows you what he's got in his so-called right to travel
[20:33.120 --> 20:40.600]  packet or binder that he carries with him in his car and on this binder or he's got
[20:40.600 --> 20:48.000]  in this binder, he's got a copy of his custom license plate that he had printed up for him
[20:48.000 --> 20:57.480]  and one of his statutory references on there is 8 USC 112.
[20:57.480 --> 21:05.520]  When you read 8 USC 112, you will see that it is protection for foreign diplomats and
[21:05.520 --> 21:15.480]  foreign individuals who are here on a foreign visa or foreign passport status.
[21:15.480 --> 21:22.720]  Right there, there's a problem and the license plate as far as a number, the number on it
[21:22.720 --> 21:27.440]  is UCC 1-308.
[21:27.440 --> 21:37.840]  So he's trying to use the United States Uniform Commercial Code as his license plate number
[21:37.840 --> 21:50.960]  for section 1-308, but also claiming that he is a foreign diplomat and by the way, the
[21:50.960 --> 22:00.080]  nation of Levitica, his own little made-up nation.
[22:00.080 --> 22:05.960]  When you look at the terms that are used in 112, 112 specifically sends you back to the
[22:05.960 --> 22:11.680]  section of law that I'm about to discuss here, which is under the Federal Immigration and
[22:11.680 --> 22:14.280]  Naturalization Act.
[22:14.280 --> 22:20.400]  It sends you back to section 1101 of that act and I will give you the complete reference
[22:20.400 --> 22:24.240]  here when I start reading through this, but I want you to listen very carefully because
[22:24.240 --> 22:28.800]  this is stuff that I'm going to go over in our meeting tomorrow and I may not get through
[22:28.800 --> 22:32.560]  the whole thing before I start getting callers tonight, but as of right now, you all need
[22:32.560 --> 22:39.560]  to understand how these people are misreading this law and why this is a problem, a big,
[22:39.560 --> 22:42.560]  big problem.
[22:42.560 --> 22:46.600]  The title of this and I'm thinking of making a legal blog article out of it is the legal
[22:46.600 --> 22:53.900]  fallacy of changing your and in double quotes, changing your status to that of again in double
[22:53.900 --> 23:03.360]  quotes, American slash state national or again in double quotes, national of the United States
[23:03.360 --> 23:04.360]  and it starts out.
[23:04.360 --> 23:05.360]  Okay.
[23:05.360 --> 23:07.520]  It is time to nip this idiotic patron up, a Triton.
[23:07.520 --> 23:12.960]  I'm a national of the United States or state national diplomatic community BS in the bud.
[23:12.960 --> 23:16.400]  This is something that came across my timeline and I had to take the time to sit down and
[23:16.400 --> 23:21.600]  directly address it again and I probably tried to do that while unknowingly interacting with
[23:21.600 --> 23:25.440]  a bunch of folks that are just too simple minded and ignorant to understand even this
[23:25.440 --> 23:30.360]  dirt simple explanation, but I will try anyway for the sake of those that have not yet been
[23:30.360 --> 23:35.480]  sucked into this potentially detrimental and life ruining nonsense.
[23:35.480 --> 23:40.000]  And folks, you get charged with a federal felony for tampering with or falsifying a
[23:40.000 --> 23:43.360]  government document and it is a felony.
[23:43.360 --> 23:48.240]  You will go to federal prison.
[23:48.240 --> 23:57.040]  You begin to understand why following these idiots is a problem, but I digress.
[23:57.040 --> 24:01.000]  For those of you that are serious about signing up for the online classes, be aware that this
[24:01.000 --> 24:06.120]  is something you will have drilled into you over and over again.
[24:06.120 --> 24:14.040]  It is imperative to read the whole statute as well as all others, no matter where they
[24:14.040 --> 24:22.280]  reside that are materially related to the subject object or objective that is contextually
[24:22.280 --> 24:26.400]  bound to the original statute in law.
[24:26.400 --> 24:32.480]  This is called an in para materia reading and interpretation of the whole of the law
[24:32.480 --> 24:42.420]  and that is W H O L E folks, not H O L E whole of the law, the whole body of law reading
[24:42.420 --> 24:47.800]  the whole of the law is one of the major rules of statutory construction and interpretation
[24:47.800 --> 24:52.080]  and it is the biggest failing of layman and patron nuts alike when it comes to actually
[24:52.080 --> 24:55.640]  understanding what they are reading.
[24:55.640 --> 25:00.480]  Another major rule is acknowledging that it is absolutely impossible to correctly understand
[25:00.480 --> 25:06.680]  and interpret any individual statute without first having a complete and accurate context
[25:06.680 --> 25:12.360]  and reading of the entire relevant statutory scheme as a whole.
[25:12.360 --> 25:17.480]  Reading only cherry pick provisions of a statutory scheme will not provide you with the necessary
[25:17.480 --> 25:23.480]  overall context and big picture aspects of what the scheme was intended to do.
[25:23.480 --> 25:28.520]  Not to mention that reading statutes in this way also leaves out a great deal of the actual
[25:28.520 --> 25:37.400]  detail level information needed to properly understand any of it.
[25:37.400 --> 25:42.640]  Let's see if any of you really are what you think you are in this post, meaning a state
[25:42.640 --> 25:49.420]  national or national of the United States, because I doubt any of you actually understand
[25:49.420 --> 25:55.520]  what you are saying at all, much less why it is legally incorrect under the law.
[25:55.520 --> 26:02.880]  Folks who are peddling this nonsense are allegedly beginning with a misreading of eight USC 1452
[26:02.880 --> 26:12.320]  subsection B, that is eight United States code section one four five two B in parentheses
[26:12.320 --> 26:18.880]  B. However, what none of these people seem to realize is that a proper reading and understanding
[26:18.880 --> 26:27.560]  of eight USC 1452 B is first and foremost completely reliant upon a proper reading and
[26:27.560 --> 26:31.200]  understanding of eight USC 1101.
[26:31.200 --> 26:36.320]  1101 is the section in the naturalization and immigration act that I was speaking of
[26:36.320 --> 26:38.920]  at the beginning.
[26:38.920 --> 26:44.560]  The issue is that no one using this information seems to have ever done that.
[26:44.560 --> 26:50.240]  And that's a very big problem for those that rely upon their misinformation.
[26:50.240 --> 26:55.260]  Not only for them, if the people they mislead ever get wise to it, but also to those who
[26:55.260 --> 27:00.000]  actually try to follow through and do the things these dis or misinformation specialists
[27:00.000 --> 27:05.560]  are peddling to them while making dishonest money for themselves.
[27:05.560 --> 27:10.160]  These folks are snake oil salesman people, and it would behoove you all to realize that
[27:10.160 --> 27:17.160]  before you do something, anything that they are telling you to do, because any of it absolutely
[27:17.160 --> 27:21.680]  can get you sent to federal prison for a long time.
[27:21.680 --> 27:27.000]  Being convicted on multiple counts of this stupidity could put you there even longer.
[27:27.000 --> 27:36.960]  Yes, eight USC 1101, a 21, the full and correct citation actually does read, and this is the
[27:36.960 --> 27:44.580]  definition of the term national under, uh, section a 21, the term national means a person
[27:44.580 --> 27:48.880]  owing permanent allegiance to a state.
[27:48.880 --> 27:55.840]  However, what none of you seem to understand is how this same subsection defines the term
[27:55.840 --> 28:05.760]  state, which reads, and in section 36, the term state includes the district of Columbia,
[28:05.760 --> 28:12.000]  Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin islands of the United States.
[28:12.000 --> 28:19.320]  Furthermore, we have to consider the statutory definition of United States that is also provided
[28:19.320 --> 28:27.480]  by the same section of federal statute, which is, and in 38, the term United States, except
[28:27.480 --> 28:35.040]  as otherwise specifically here in provided when used in a geographical sense means the
[28:35.040 --> 28:43.520]  continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Virgin islands
[28:43.520 --> 28:45.760]  of the United States.
[28:45.760 --> 28:52.720]  We also need to take notice that there was a 1966 amendment that added the canal zone
[28:52.720 --> 29:00.560]  to the list of places that are included in the definition of United States to wit 1966
[29:00.560 --> 29:07.920]  subsection a 38 publication L 89 dash seven, one 10 or seven 10 inserted sentence, providing
[29:07.920 --> 29:13.320]  that term United States is used in section 1452 of this title for the purpose of issuing
[29:13.320 --> 29:17.920]  certificates of citizenship to persons who are citizens of the United States shall include
[29:17.920 --> 29:20.520]  the canal zone.
[29:20.520 --> 29:27.480]  Now in order to understand what subsection eight 36 actually means, you must understand
[29:27.480 --> 29:31.620]  how the terms includes and including actually function in law.
[29:31.620 --> 29:37.080]  For that, you can read my article on the subject on my legal blog, and I have the includes
[29:37.080 --> 29:41.480]  and including revisited article on my legal blog for you that you can go read that at
[29:41.480 --> 29:43.480]  LinkedIn here.
[29:43.480 --> 29:48.000]  Alright folks, we're going to take a quick break, call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:48.000 --> 29:51.800]  I am going to be presenting this here for a little bit, but if you want to call and
[29:51.800 --> 29:55.480]  get in line and wait, you can, or if you want to call after I'm done, you can.
[29:55.480 --> 30:02.480]  Anyway, we'll be right back after this break, so y'all hold on.
[30:02.480 --> 30:06.760]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under
[30:06.760 --> 30:08.200]  the blood alcohol limit.
[30:08.200 --> 30:13.160]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalyzers and a government
[30:13.160 --> 30:15.720]  cover-up in a moment.
[30:15.720 --> 30:17.320]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.320 --> 30:20.920]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.920 --> 30:25.680]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.680 --> 30:30.840]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.840 --> 30:33.440]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.440 --> 30:37.740]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search
[30:37.740 --> 30:41.280]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.280 --> 30:44.720]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:44.720 --> 30:46.860]  Ever hear the term fine farming?
[30:46.860 --> 30:51.400]  It's when cops fine innocent people to bring in revenue, and it's apparently big business
[30:51.400 --> 30:53.720]  in the sunshine state of Florida.
[30:53.720 --> 30:59.600]  This case involves breathalyzers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[30:59.600 --> 31:04.260]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated.
[31:04.260 --> 31:07.880]  Public officials knew about it for two and a half years, but did nothing.
[31:07.880 --> 31:12.880]  In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document
[31:12.880 --> 31:13.880]  the problem.
[31:13.880 --> 31:18.760]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, but now that the cover-up has been exposed,
[31:18.760 --> 31:21.480]  perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[31:21.480 --> 31:23.480]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:23.480 --> 31:30.600]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.600 --> 31:35.960]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[31:35.960 --> 31:38.200]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.200 --> 31:43.040]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.040 --> 31:45.720]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:45.720 --> 31:48.480]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:48.480 --> 31:49.880]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:49.880 --> 31:50.880]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:50.880 --> 31:52.320]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:52.320 --> 31:53.320]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:53.320 --> 31:54.960]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:54.960 --> 31:57.560]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:57.560 --> 32:00.840]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:00.840 --> 32:05.040]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:05.040 --> 32:08.880]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going
[32:08.880 --> 32:12.520]  to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.520 --> 32:16.040]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act
[32:16.040 --> 32:19.760]  in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.760 --> 32:23.920]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:23.920 --> 32:25.320]  our rights through due process.
[32:25.320 --> 32:29.280]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.280 --> 32:33.040]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.040 --> 32:35.440]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.440 --> 32:39.400]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.400 --> 32:40.760]  ordering your copy today.
[32:40.760 --> 32:44.120]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.120 --> 32:48.520]  The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.520 --> 32:50.840]  documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.840 --> 32:54.800]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.800 --> 32:59.620]  Order your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.620 --> 33:06.620]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:29.620 --> 33:34.620]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com
[33:34.620 --> 33:36.620]  All right, folks, we are back.
[33:36.620 --> 33:41.620]  This is Logos Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:41.620 --> 33:43.620]  It is April 10th, 2023.
[33:43.620 --> 33:45.620]  We are live tonight.
[33:45.620 --> 33:48.620]  So let's continue on with this.
[33:48.620 --> 33:52.620]  The above article explains certain rules of statutory reading and construction
[33:52.620 --> 33:58.620]  that determine how items listed after the terms includes or including in a statutory scheme
[33:58.620 --> 34:05.620]  are subject to the legal maximum of a justum generis, meaning of the same type, kind, or class,
[34:05.620 --> 34:11.620]  which is a rule of statutory construction that dictates how general words as used in a statute
[34:11.620 --> 34:18.620]  that follow specific words in a list must be construed as referring only to the same type, kind,
[34:18.620 --> 34:25.620]  or class of things identified by the specific words.
[34:25.620 --> 34:32.620]  Furthermore, the use of the term national in this definition is political in nature, not geographical.
[34:32.620 --> 34:38.620]  Logically, we know this to be true because the term state does not include any of the several states of the Union,
[34:38.620 --> 34:44.620]  while the term United States does encompass Alaska, Hawaii, and the continental United States.
[34:44.620 --> 34:48.620]  How does the term United States help us understand this assertion to be true?
[34:48.620 --> 34:55.620]  Well, because it is a plain and well-known fact that each of these locations had or has an indigenous population,
[34:55.620 --> 35:02.620]  i.e. those who are the true state nationals under this law, that either predates the forming of the United States,
[35:02.620 --> 35:07.620]  like the American Indians of the continental United States, which was originally mostly territories
[35:07.620 --> 35:14.620]  instead of states of the Union, or that only became a state after being purchased or annexed
[35:14.620 --> 35:18.620]  by the United States government, like Alaska and Hawaii both did.
[35:18.620 --> 35:24.620]  Or elective annexation, like with Texas, had it been done properly via a majority vote.
[35:24.620 --> 35:29.620]  Purchasing and annexation are political acts rather than acts of conquest.
[35:29.620 --> 35:36.620]  Hence, the indigenous peoples of these locations are political citizens who either are or were residing in an otherwise foreign state,
[35:36.620 --> 35:43.620]  rather than being natural-born citizens owing their origin and allegiance to one of the actual states of the Union.
[35:43.620 --> 35:49.620]  This is why none of the indigenous people in these locations that have either not become an actual Union state
[35:49.620 --> 35:57.620]  or who do not operate as an entirely separate and independent local government have any voting congressional representatives.
[35:57.620 --> 36:02.620]  This is a single level of logical inference using the aforementioned rule of adjuslum generis
[36:02.620 --> 36:08.620]  relative to how state and United States are both defined within the context of this statutory scheme.
[36:08.620 --> 36:15.620]  Now, once you understand how these three definitions must be read together and how they legally interact,
[36:15.620 --> 36:21.620]  what you have, legally speaking, is a definition of national that reads and works very much like this.
[36:21.620 --> 36:31.620]  The term national means a person owing permanent allegiance to either the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam,
[36:31.620 --> 36:40.620]  the Virgin Islands, or the Canal Zone as being either a possession, territory, protectorate, or enclave of the United States.
[36:40.620 --> 36:46.620]  Notice that this clarified definition does not make reference to the continent of the United States, Alaska, or Hawaii
[36:46.620 --> 36:49.620]  as being one of the states to which it applies.
[36:49.620 --> 36:55.620]  That's because they have all become or have been divided up into actual states belonging to the Union of States
[36:55.620 --> 37:00.620]  while none of the others listed under the definition of United States yet have.
[37:00.620 --> 37:07.620]  Yeah, people, that is what the term national really means in 8 U.S.C. 1101A21.
[37:07.620 --> 37:15.620]  Therefore, if you are actually a national as defined by this statute, then you are, without any doubt whatsoever,
[37:15.620 --> 37:25.620]  a U.S. citizen because you reside or originate from a location over which the United States government has plenary power.
[37:25.620 --> 37:32.620]  Plenary power is something the United States government absolutely does not have within the several states of the Union.
[37:32.620 --> 37:40.620]  Yep, that's right. The District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Canal Zone
[37:40.620 --> 37:46.620]  are the only locations that are categorized as states relative to this statute.
[37:46.620 --> 37:51.620]  These are all locations where the United States Congress has plenary power and authority
[37:51.620 --> 37:55.620]  and does not encompass any of the several continental union states.
[37:55.620 --> 38:03.620]  These are the only places listed in the subsection 36 definition of state, and they each fall into one of these categories,
[38:03.620 --> 38:09.620]  a U.S. possession, a U.S. territory, a U.S. protectorate, or a U.S. enclave.
[38:09.620 --> 38:14.620]  Each of these are under the direct plenary power and authority of the United States federal government.
[38:14.620 --> 38:23.620]  Thus, the correct answer for probably all of you is almost certainly no, I'm not a state, national, or national of the United States.
[38:23.620 --> 38:28.620]  So who can legitimately call themselves either of these things under this federal law?
[38:28.620 --> 38:35.620]  Those people who are jointly referred to as Alaskan natives, which are divided into five major groupings.
[38:35.620 --> 38:41.620]  Forgive my mispronunciation if I have any of these people listening.
[38:41.620 --> 38:49.620]  The Aleuts, northern Eskimos, which are the Inupiat, southern Eskimos, which are the Yuit,
[38:49.620 --> 38:56.620]  interior Indians, which are Athabaskans, and southeast coastal Indians, which are Tlingit and Haida,
[38:56.620 --> 39:04.620]  the Samoans of Hawaii, Puerto Ricans, the Chamorros of Guam, the Taino of the Virgin Islands,
[39:04.620 --> 39:10.620]  the Panamanians of the Panama Canal, and the Washingtonians of the District of Columbia.
[39:10.620 --> 39:18.620]  So how then, in your minds, does this statute make any of you a national or bring the Geneva Convention into play?
[39:18.620 --> 39:25.620]  Because that's another thing they push with this paperwork that they've got, is that you can invoke the Geneva Convention to protect you.
[39:25.620 --> 39:30.620]  It's stupid, I know, but it's what they peddle.
[39:30.620 --> 39:38.620]  Because I'm betting that everything else you may have read or been told on this subject was also completely misread and misunderstood
[39:38.620 --> 39:41.620]  in exactly the same way and manner as this section of law.
[39:41.620 --> 39:48.620]  So I hate to be the one to break it all down for you, but each and every one of you that are promoting
[39:48.620 --> 39:53.620]  or hanging your hats and well-being on this fallacy of correct your status to being a state, national, or national
[39:53.620 --> 39:57.620]  of the United States thing is dead wrong.
[39:57.620 --> 40:05.620]  Other potentially relevant definitions codified within this section of federal law are the definition of the term person,
[40:05.620 --> 40:08.620]  which means an individual or organization.
[40:08.620 --> 40:16.620]  The term organization means, but is not limited to, an organization, corporation, company, partnership, association, trust, foundation, or fund,
[40:16.620 --> 40:24.620]  and includes a group of persons, whether or not incorporated permanently or temporarily associated together with joint action on any subject or subjects.
[40:24.620 --> 40:33.620]  The term outlying positions of the United States means American Samoa, i.e. Hawaii, and Swains Island.
[40:33.620 --> 40:41.620]  The term passport means any travel document issued by competent authority, people.
[40:41.620 --> 40:44.620]  Competent authority.
[40:44.620 --> 40:46.620]  The states cannot issue passports.
[40:46.620 --> 40:50.620]  Individuals cannot issue passports.
[40:50.620 --> 40:55.620]  So if you're doing anything to request a passport, who do you have to request a passport from?
[40:55.620 --> 41:00.620]  The federal government.
[41:00.620 --> 41:09.620]  Showing the bearer's origin, identity, and nationality, if any, which is valid for the entry of the bearer into a foreign country.
[41:09.620 --> 41:12.620]  Now, this is my original posting of this.
[41:12.620 --> 41:20.620]  This next bit is my original posting of this information from a Facebook discussion of this very same law with another individual
[41:20.620 --> 41:29.620]  about his refusal to accept the reality of the law while he was trying to peddle the change or status to a state, national BS and my legal discussion group.
[41:29.620 --> 41:33.620]  And the picture he posted was one that had the words on it.
[41:33.620 --> 41:50.620]  I am not a U.S. citizen, but I am a state national as described in USC 8, Section 1101A21 with limited diplomatic immunity as one who and I've got I've overmarked it.
[41:50.620 --> 41:55.620]  But anyway, it basically goes as per the Geneva Convention.
[41:55.620 --> 41:58.620]  So that's where the Geneva Convention point came in.
[41:58.620 --> 42:03.620]  The guy who was promoting this was some dude by the name of Bill Ryland.
[42:03.620 --> 42:12.620]  OK, and he is one of those people that just refused to accept the facts when it's put right in front of him.
[42:12.620 --> 42:23.620]  As you will see from this exchange, Bill's Ryland, Bill Ryland's comment on my post in that group was we are supposed to be state nationals.
[42:23.620 --> 42:25.620]  Why all this gibberish?
[42:25.620 --> 42:35.620]  My reply back was how about you provide a link to the specific definition of state national you are relying upon to make that statement as if it is fact.
[42:35.620 --> 42:42.620]  And just like I knew he would, he posted a link to 8 USC 1101A21.
[42:42.620 --> 42:44.620]  I knew that's what he was going to do.
[42:44.620 --> 42:52.620]  Then he also posted a link to 8 USC 1452B again, which I knew he was going to do.
[42:52.620 --> 42:55.620]  So I was prepared for this.
[42:55.620 --> 43:02.620]  So my response to those two comments were I was fairly certain that was the law you were going to cite.
[43:02.620 --> 43:05.620]  And it's a completely incorrect reading and understanding of it.
[43:05.620 --> 43:09.620]  Thus, I'm pretty sure I told you this before.
[43:09.620 --> 43:19.620]  But just in case I'm mistaken, I'll tell you now if you are going to use the definitions that are defined by 8 USC 1101, such as national,
[43:19.620 --> 43:30.620]  then perhaps it will be a good idea to read all of them that are relevant before thinking you understand them and what they mean when used elsewhere.
[43:30.620 --> 43:33.620]  All right.
[43:33.620 --> 43:36.620]  I got to take another quick break here and then I will be back.
[43:36.620 --> 43:38.620]  I should be almost done with this.
[43:38.620 --> 43:43.620]  So if y'all want to start calling and get in line, please do 512-646-1984.
[43:43.620 --> 43:48.620]  And I will start taking your calls at the end of this next segment because I should be done with this by then.
[43:48.620 --> 43:50.620]  And we will go from there.
[43:50.620 --> 43:53.620]  So, folks, y'all hang on and we'll be right back after this break.
[43:53.620 --> 44:20.620]  512-646-1984.
[44:23.620 --> 44:27.620]  can too.
[44:27.620 --> 44:32.620]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:32.620 --> 44:41.620]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:41.620 --> 44:47.740]  American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms
[44:47.740 --> 44:54.820]  for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and
[44:54.820 --> 45:01.180]  click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.180 --> 45:05.900]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm
[45:05.900 --> 45:09.700]  so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth fixed. I'd
[45:09.700 --> 45:14.300]  be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I
[45:14.300 --> 45:17.940]  love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't
[45:17.940 --> 45:22.060]  have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help
[45:22.060 --> 45:27.140]  logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can
[45:27.140 --> 45:31.620]  help logos. You can order your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear
[45:31.620 --> 45:37.940]  your cookies. Now go to logosradionetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and book
[45:37.940 --> 45:43.060]  market. Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets
[45:43.060 --> 45:47.460]  a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything different when I
[45:47.460 --> 45:53.620]  order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow, giving without doing
[45:53.620 --> 45:59.220]  anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. You're welcome.
[45:59.220 --> 46:08.420]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[46:29.220 --> 46:34.420]  Happy Holidays, Logos.
[46:59.220 --> 47:18.820]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Logos Law Radio. Let's see if I can get this
[47:18.820 --> 47:32.180]  wrapped up. All right. By definition, national and national of the United
[47:32.180 --> 47:38.580]  States have these assigned meanings. In section 21, the term national means a
[47:38.580 --> 47:44.260]  person owing permanent allegiance to a state. 22, the term national of the United
[47:44.260 --> 47:50.660]  States means a citizen of the United States, which as we pointed out, folks are
[47:50.660 --> 47:57.860]  the Samoans of Hawaii and the Indians of Alaska, the natives of Alaska. Okay, those
[47:57.860 --> 48:03.380]  are a citizen of the United States for the purposes of the statute or be a
[48:03.380 --> 48:08.740]  person who though not a citizen of the United States owes permanent allegiance
[48:08.740 --> 48:14.580]  to the United States. Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and the Canal Zone,
[48:14.580 --> 48:19.540]  the people who live in those places owe allegiance to the United States, but
[48:19.540 --> 48:24.020]  they are not citizens of the United States. Do you understand how this works
[48:24.020 --> 48:31.700]  yet? Notice that a national is a person owing permanent allegiance to a state
[48:31.700 --> 48:37.220]  and not the United States. By definition, state has this assigned meaning within
[48:37.220 --> 48:42.420]  the context of this statutory scheme. And again, the term state includes the
[48:42.420 --> 48:46.900]  District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States
[48:46.900 --> 48:53.220]  and the Commonwealth of the North Mariana Islands. Okay. And the Canal Zone.
[48:53.220 --> 48:59.380]  Let's not forget that the term includes as used in sub item 36 definition of
[48:59.380 --> 49:04.980]  state is an all-inclusive list. Thus, it excludes anything else not specifically
[49:04.980 --> 49:09.380]  listed by default. I would like to point out that the several states, states in
[49:09.380 --> 49:13.940]  the union, union states or contiguous United States are not terms listed
[49:13.940 --> 49:19.780]  therein and are therefore excluded from playing any part in the definition as
[49:19.780 --> 49:25.620]  used here. The term state does not mean, nor does it have any legal relationship
[49:25.620 --> 49:29.780]  to any of the several states of the union. That means that the people born
[49:29.780 --> 49:34.260]  within any of the several union states are not included in the definition of
[49:34.260 --> 49:40.180]  national in any way. And they never were. Why? Because the definition of state as
[49:40.180 --> 49:44.900]  used here is used in the territorial jurisdiction of Congress sense, and not
[49:44.900 --> 49:50.260]  in the constitutional sense. By definition, United States has this
[49:50.260 --> 49:54.820]  assigned meaning within the context of this statutory scheme, the term United
[49:54.820 --> 49:58.100]  States, except as otherwise specifically here in provided when used in a
[49:58.100 --> 50:02.100]  geographical sense means the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii,
[50:02.100 --> 50:05.860]  Puerto Rico, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States and the commonwealth
[50:05.860 --> 50:10.420]  of the Northern Mariana Islands. Now remember continental United States.
[50:10.420 --> 50:16.900]  Okay. We discussed what that does have and what it does not. Now, the problem
[50:16.900 --> 50:21.780]  with your understanding of the term United States is used in 8 USC 1452 B is
[50:21.780 --> 50:31.300]  this. Okay. And they inserted subsection A 38 again, 89 7 10, and it includes the
[50:31.300 --> 50:35.620]  canal zone definition. Now, once again, the use of includes here is not
[50:35.620 --> 50:41.060]  expansive. It is fixed because the items that follow it in the list are specific
[50:41.060 --> 50:46.740]  and unique, having no relatives in any equivalent class of objects. So as to be
[50:46.740 --> 50:50.900]  included, the canal zone is unique in relation to what it can and does
[50:50.900 --> 50:56.020]  include. In other words, this tells us the term, the use of the term United
[50:56.020 --> 51:01.780]  States in relation to eight USC 1452 B is once again, territorial and not
[51:01.780 --> 51:07.540]  geographical. Thus the definition in 38 is also completely inapplicable to the
[51:07.540 --> 51:11.620]  meaning of the term national, which means it meshes perfectly with the part
[51:11.620 --> 51:16.660]  of sub item 38 that reads except as otherwise specifically here in provided
[51:16.660 --> 51:21.220]  because this change is the exception specifically here in provided that
[51:21.220 --> 51:25.300]  expressly removes the several States from its meaning relative to the
[51:25.300 --> 51:30.260]  continental United States. In short, you would appear to be reading this
[51:30.260 --> 51:36.820]  section of eight USC 100% incorrectly, just as many others before you have
[51:36.820 --> 51:42.740]  also done. And then he puts in why citizen slash national on the passport
[51:42.740 --> 51:46.660]  because I understand it correctly. There is a citizen, a state geographical and
[51:46.660 --> 51:52.260]  a citizen of the United States. And I replied back, I just showed you the law
[51:52.260 --> 51:56.260]  that proves without a doubt that you do not understand it correctly. And you are
[51:56.260 --> 52:01.460]  free to ignore that all you want until it bites you in the ass. However, it
[52:01.460 --> 52:05.300]  won't be a misunderstanding that I will let you perpetuate in my group or on my
[52:05.300 --> 52:11.540]  page. I, or we deal with law and facts here, not personal feelings or refusals
[52:11.540 --> 52:16.900]  to recognize such as things when such things, when placed in front of you, the
[52:16.900 --> 52:23.860]  passport is not the law. It is a document issued by law and not even this law. So
[52:23.860 --> 52:29.380]  it is 100% irrelevant to your original point or your response here. And then he
[52:29.380 --> 52:32.980]  again replies back, it's all about citizenship and laws regarding it. And
[52:32.980 --> 52:37.860]  the passport is evidence of citizenship. And then he also posts, do you have the
[52:37.860 --> 52:41.460]  ability to cut and paste the citations I offered? I don't have internet yet. And
[52:41.460 --> 52:46.020]  that is too tedious to type each one out. And to me, and he continues on to me,
[52:46.020 --> 52:49.940]  the codes are clear and I solely use my passport for identification now. And I
[52:49.940 --> 52:55.540]  have not experienced any problems with using it. Again, I replied back. I
[52:55.540 --> 53:00.020]  supplied the statute that precede and control what you are reading in eight USC
[53:00.020 --> 53:05.380]  1452 B. The definitions I gave you in my original comment are the ones that are
[53:05.380 --> 53:11.540]  controlling over what 1452 legally means and how it applies. So pasting 1452 in,
[53:11.540 --> 53:14.980]  is it going to be any more helpful than what I already have provided because
[53:14.980 --> 53:20.100]  they control what it means. The codes only appear clear to you because you
[53:20.100 --> 53:23.460]  merely think you are actually understanding the terms being used. But I
[53:23.460 --> 53:27.940]  have shown quite clearly here that you don't. So your understanding is
[53:27.940 --> 53:32.580]  completely incorrect. You are making two unrelated arguments here,
[53:32.580 --> 53:37.780]  passports and who is legally defined as a national in the law. The two are not
[53:37.780 --> 53:42.340]  directly related as they involve two very different statutory schemes. So
[53:42.340 --> 53:45.860]  doing that isn't doing you any good and understanding what you're reading.
[53:46.420 --> 53:51.860]  Forget the passport and reread what I wrote about who is and who is not a
[53:51.860 --> 53:56.420]  national, because it does not mean what you seem to think it does. And it most
[53:56.420 --> 54:00.980]  certainly does not apply to whom you seem to think it does. And he again,
[54:00.980 --> 54:05.540]  responds, how do you understand jurisdiction is a jurisdiction formed by
[54:05.540 --> 54:08.900]  the 14th amendment. What jurisdiction are you under? What is identity theft and
[54:08.900 --> 54:12.420]  human trafficking? Are these pertinent questions regarding citizenship in the
[54:12.420 --> 54:20.180]  USA? I replied once again, you are making a completely different and irrelevant
[54:20.180 --> 54:25.540]  argument from the original several. In fact, at this point, I am in serious
[54:25.540 --> 54:29.460]  doubt that your understanding of jurisdiction is any better than what you
[54:29.460 --> 54:34.020]  understand about the legal term national, despite my thus far numerous and
[54:34.020 --> 54:39.060]  clearly documented efforts to try and correct your misunderstanding. So how
[54:39.060 --> 54:43.940]  about you first learn to stick to the point, which is you do not have a
[54:43.940 --> 54:47.700]  correct understanding of the legal definition and meaning of national and
[54:47.700 --> 54:52.980]  your feelings and thoughts about it are 100% irrelevant, just as they are 100%
[54:52.980 --> 54:58.820]  incorrect. You do not even seem to realize that you are not arguing with me.
[54:58.820 --> 55:03.940]  You are arguing with what the law itself clearly shows to be true, that you are
[55:03.940 --> 55:09.860]  completely wrong about what and who is a national. So you can stop beating your
[55:09.860 --> 55:14.340]  national horse because the thing is dead already. And I have just shown you the
[55:14.340 --> 55:19.940]  carcass and it's tombstone. And then he replies, you are hopeless, unlawfully
[55:19.940 --> 55:25.860]  converted debt slave. And I said, are you a hopelessly ignorant and utterly
[55:25.860 --> 55:30.260]  pointless Facebook troll? You keep going off on tangents that are completely
[55:30.260 --> 55:35.620]  irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Why to perhaps deny or deflect the fact
[55:35.620 --> 55:38.340]  that you were proven wrong about something you want to be considered
[55:38.340 --> 55:42.740]  knowledgeable in, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary,
[55:42.740 --> 55:47.620]  aren't you a tad bit beyond being old enough to try to not try such a
[55:47.620 --> 55:51.540]  childish tactic. Once you have completely lost a debate, then he goes, I
[55:51.540 --> 55:56.980]  didn't lose any debate. Are you a 14th amendment debt slave? So again, let me
[55:56.980 --> 56:02.500]  say this again, Bill Rylan, not only did you resoundingly lose the debate, you
[56:02.500 --> 56:07.540]  keep trying to save yourself from being wrong by deflecting and asking 100%
[56:07.540 --> 56:10.740]  irrelevant questions that have nothing to do with the actual point of
[56:10.740 --> 56:16.340]  discussion, which also makes you a failure in debate. Now, if you want to
[56:16.340 --> 56:20.900]  continue arguing otherwise, all you have to do is provide some actual proof in
[56:20.900 --> 56:25.380]  the law itself that declares a national to be the same thing as an American
[56:25.380 --> 56:30.020]  citizen born in one of the several States of the union until you can and do
[56:30.020 --> 56:35.140]  manage that you have lost and you will continue to do so as long as you keep
[56:35.140 --> 56:39.540]  opening your mouth to ask irrelevant crap about irrelevant crap. Now, is
[56:39.540 --> 56:43.140]  there anything else I can help you correct about your self-deluded version
[56:43.140 --> 56:48.980]  of reality? And his last and only reply, okay, you won the debate. Good luck
[56:48.980 --> 56:53.380]  with being a 14th amendment debt slave. And I was like, yeah, whatever. I'd
[56:53.380 --> 56:57.140]  wager that I am a lot freer than you are in that regard because I correctly
[56:57.140 --> 57:00.740]  understand the law as posted here into whom it does and does not apply, which
[57:00.740 --> 57:04.500]  you obviously don't according to the evidence. So instead of trying to make
[57:04.500 --> 57:07.860]  yet another pointless personal attack and argument, try dealing with the facts
[57:07.860 --> 57:10.980]  and evidence that was put in front of you. So either prove it as incorrect
[57:10.980 --> 57:15.060]  information or drop it and stop sounding like another fool who can't face facts
[57:15.060 --> 57:20.660]  because you have nothing left but that at this point. Okay, that ladies and
[57:20.660 --> 57:23.460]  gentlemen is going to be part of the discussion in the meeting tomorrow
[57:23.460 --> 57:30.020]  night at seven. So if you wish to join in, please send me an email to Eddie at
[57:30.020 --> 57:35.220]  ruleoflawradio.com and I will send you the information to get into the
[57:35.220 --> 57:38.580]  meeting. And remember, I don't know how many people are going to show up. It
[57:38.580 --> 57:44.340]  may be three. It may be 200. I don't know. But the fact of the matter is I
[57:44.340 --> 57:49.140]  only have room for 100. So if you want to participate, you need to get that
[57:49.140 --> 57:53.460]  email to me and get a link back so that you can get into it. All right.
[57:53.460 --> 57:57.300]  That said, I got a break to take and I will start taking phone calls on the
[57:57.300 --> 58:01.220]  other side. So if you want to call and get in line, I will be talking with you
[58:01.220 --> 58:07.780]  in the next hour. 512-646-1984 is the call in number. If you're out there and
[58:07.780 --> 58:12.260]  want to talk, please call and let's do that. Y'all hang on and we'll be right
[58:12.260 --> 58:22.100]  back after this break.
[58:42.260 --> 58:54.980]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are
[58:54.980 --> 58:59.540]  frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try
[58:59.540 --> 59:04.660]  to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound
[59:04.660 --> 59:09.780]  meaning of the scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new
[59:09.780 --> 59:14.660]  translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.660 --> 59:20.340]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened
[59:20.340 --> 59:24.740]  up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word
[59:24.740 --> 59:29.540]  beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to
[59:29.540 --> 59:34.340]  give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet
[59:34.340 --> 59:43.460]  compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.460 --> 59:50.980]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.980 --> 59:58.020]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[59:58.020 --> 01:00:04.500]  The Bill of Rights contains the first 10 amendments of our constitution. They
[01:00:04.500 --> 01:00:07.940]  guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. Our
[01:00:07.940 --> 01:00:10.980]  liberty depends on it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be
[01:00:10.980 --> 01:00:14.740]  right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional
[01:00:14.740 --> 01:00:20.020]  rights. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll
[01:00:20.020 --> 01:00:23.940]  never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your
[01:00:23.940 --> 01:00:28.420]  freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to
[01:00:28.420 --> 01:00:33.220]  surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging
[01:00:33.220 --> 01:00:37.780]  on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the
[01:00:37.780 --> 01:00:42.740]  private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with
[01:00:42.740 --> 01:00:48.580]  Startpage. When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping
[01:00:48.580 --> 01:00:52.580]  my two arms around the Bill of Rights in a big old bear hug. It's how I remember
[01:00:52.580 --> 01:00:56.580]  that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms, arms that
[01:00:56.580 --> 01:01:00.100]  embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight.
[01:01:00.100 --> 01:01:04.980]  Get it? Two arms, bear hug, bear arms? The late Senator Hubert Humphrey
[01:01:04.980 --> 01:01:08.340]  captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well when he said,
[01:01:08.340 --> 01:01:12.580]  the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary
[01:01:12.580 --> 01:01:16.420]  government, one more safeguard against the tyranny, which now appears remote
[01:01:16.420 --> 01:01:20.660]  in America, but which historically has proved to always be possible.
[01:01:20.660 --> 01:01:24.740]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:01:33.220 --> 01:01:37.300]  You may think our brains deteriorate with age, but new research shows that as
[01:01:37.300 --> 01:01:41.460]  brains get older, they actually work more efficiently. I'm Dr. Catherine
[01:01:41.460 --> 01:01:46.100]  Albrecht, back with new research on how aging makes the mind sharper after this.
[01:01:46.100 --> 01:01:50.740]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[01:01:50.740 --> 01:01:54.260]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone,
[01:01:54.260 --> 01:01:58.980]  you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights.
[01:01:58.980 --> 01:02:02.820]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.820 --> 01:02:06.980]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by
[01:02:06.980 --> 01:02:10.980]  StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:02:10.980 --> 01:02:18.260]  Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage. It's a widely held notion that the older
[01:02:18.260 --> 01:02:22.580]  people get, the more doddering they become. But new research shows that even as our
[01:02:22.580 --> 01:02:27.620]  brains age, they can actually become more efficient. Scientists asked two groups of
[01:02:27.620 --> 01:02:34.260]  volunteers, one age 18 to 35 and the other 55 to 75, to associate different words
[01:02:34.260 --> 01:02:38.820]  with given topics. At one point, they told everyone they'd made a mistake.
[01:02:38.820 --> 01:02:42.740]  When that happened, the younger group's brains lit up and lost focus.
[01:02:42.740 --> 01:02:46.580]  But the older group's brains didn't even flinch and they stayed focused on
[01:02:46.580 --> 01:02:51.300]  solving the next task. The moral? There's something to be said for experience.
[01:02:51.300 --> 01:03:13.060]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:21.300 --> 01:03:38.500]  All right, folks. This is Willow Ball Radio,
[01:03:38.500 --> 01:03:43.940]  Monday Night Show with your host, Eddie Craig, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:43.940 --> 01:03:46.580]  If you want to call and talk, please do so and get in line.
[01:03:46.580 --> 01:03:53.140]  I've got callers up on the board. It is April 10th, 2023. We are live tonight.
[01:03:53.140 --> 01:03:59.140]  So if you want to call now's the time. Okay. That said, first up, we have what
[01:03:59.140 --> 01:04:02.420]  looks like Jerry in Pennsylvania. Jerry, what can we do for you?
[01:04:04.020 --> 01:04:12.020]  Oh yeah. Yes. Yeah. I took one of these code enforcement officers to court
[01:04:12.020 --> 01:04:20.020]  over, uh, yeah, they wrote me some, uh, citations here for, uh, you know, high
[01:04:20.020 --> 01:04:28.100]  grass, abandoned vehicle, stuff like that. Anyway, I got a judgment on it in the, uh,
[01:04:28.100 --> 01:04:36.900]  circuit of appeal. Uh huh. Yeah. So, but they never gave me any money on it.
[01:04:36.900 --> 01:04:44.900]  What do you mean you got a judgment on it? Well, they sent me back a judgment on the case.
[01:04:45.700 --> 01:04:52.900]  They found, uh, uh, for me, but, uh, I didn't get, uh, uh,
[01:04:52.900 --> 01:04:57.060]  what did you, when you say you took them to court, was it on the citations?
[01:04:57.060 --> 01:05:02.500]  They issued you, or was it a lawsuit you filed against them? Oh, it was in a lawsuit.
[01:05:02.500 --> 01:05:06.100]  Okay. You filed an actual lawsuit. How much money did you ask for?
[01:05:08.580 --> 01:05:15.060]  Uh, two, I think it's 250,000. Okay. And how much did the court award you in the judgment?
[01:05:16.420 --> 01:05:22.500]  Nothing. They just said judgment and that was it. No award.
[01:05:24.420 --> 01:05:30.660]  Does it specifically say no award or is it just say the court did not award you?
[01:05:30.660 --> 01:05:35.460]  No award or is it just say the court finds in your favor and here by whatever.
[01:05:37.620 --> 01:05:44.260]  Yeah. They, uh, mentioned the marriage, you know, that they did come on the property illegally
[01:05:45.220 --> 01:05:52.260]  and they did charge it illegally, you know, stuff like that. And, uh, then they said that they, uh,
[01:05:52.260 --> 01:06:05.300]  uh, remanded, uh, uh, for further, uh, proceedings. Um, and that was it. I, I filed back at the, uh,
[01:06:06.500 --> 01:06:13.940]  at the U S court, but, uh, they never, uh, did anything either.
[01:06:13.940 --> 01:06:21.620]  Well, the U S court won't touch it until you've exhausted all your state administrative remedies.
[01:06:23.620 --> 01:06:24.820]  Well, I get all that.
[01:06:26.340 --> 01:06:31.460]  Well, you just said you filed a state lawsuit, which you just now got a judgment on, right?
[01:06:32.420 --> 01:06:41.220]  Well, I filed, uh, the state law, the state suit was to fight the, uh, the court.
[01:06:41.220 --> 01:06:46.340]  But when we went to court on the county court, uh, are you talking about when you went to court
[01:06:46.340 --> 01:06:53.780]  on the citations? Yeah. The citation. Okay. Stop, stop. This is where we're having a miscommunication.
[01:06:53.780 --> 01:07:01.700]  I specifically asked you when you say you got a judgment, are you talking about the case where
[01:07:01.700 --> 01:07:09.780]  you were issued the citations and went to court, or are you talking about an actual civil lawsuit
[01:07:09.780 --> 01:07:19.460]  you filed explicitly naming the code officer and his department and the city of as defendants in
[01:07:19.460 --> 01:07:28.420]  the lawsuit, right? Which is it? Don't write. Which is it? Oh yeah. Just what you said. I,
[01:07:28.420 --> 01:07:32.420]  I said two different things. Which one is applicable?
[01:07:32.420 --> 01:07:42.260]  Which one is applicable? Yeah. The one where I named the city official in the federal lawsuit.
[01:07:43.380 --> 01:07:49.460]  Okay. That's the federal lawsuit. What was your judgment for in state court?
[01:07:51.460 --> 01:07:58.180]  Oh, the state court, uh, they said that I didn't have a K. They sent it back and
[01:07:58.180 --> 01:08:08.340]  said it was dismissed at the state level. Okay. Uh, so even though you got a judgment
[01:08:08.340 --> 01:08:12.980]  on the citation saying the citations were illegally issued because they illegally
[01:08:12.980 --> 01:08:19.460]  entered your property, the state court said you didn't have a case. That doesn't sound right.
[01:08:19.460 --> 01:08:27.460]  Right. Well, that's what they, but assuming that that is accurate, that's you filed the
[01:08:27.460 --> 01:08:34.500]  federal case at that point. Once you had gotten that notification of the dismissal back from the
[01:08:34.500 --> 01:08:41.060]  court in your state civil suit, then you file the federal suit. Did you file it before you got that
[01:08:41.060 --> 01:08:50.900]  dismissal back before? Okay. How can you, again, therein lies your problem. If you filed your
[01:08:50.900 --> 01:08:57.220]  federal suit before you got a dismissal at the state level of your civil suit there, the fed
[01:08:57.220 --> 01:09:02.980]  won't touch it because you have failed to exhaust your state administrative remedies before going to
[01:09:02.980 --> 01:09:15.140]  federal court. Well, once the state dismissed it, what's left? You've just got to take once the
[01:09:15.140 --> 01:09:21.940]  state dismisses it, then you can file your federal suit and claim that you have no remedy in the
[01:09:21.940 --> 01:09:28.900]  state. And now you have no choice, but to seek remedy at the federal level. But until you get
[01:09:28.900 --> 01:09:36.260]  that from the state, you don't have a federal level case unless the rights that were violated
[01:09:36.260 --> 01:09:44.420]  were also governed under federal law. So if you named a fourth, fifth or a first or 15th amendment
[01:09:44.420 --> 01:09:51.780]  violation or 14th amendment violation to your, uh, federally protected rights, which is what you
[01:09:51.780 --> 01:09:56.740]  would have had to have done in your lawsuit to give the fed jurisdiction of it. Then they might
[01:09:56.740 --> 01:10:04.900]  have been able to do something. So I'd have to take, take the state case that was dismissed
[01:10:05.620 --> 01:10:12.260]  and file that in the federal, because that would be the criminal side of it. Right? No,
[01:10:12.260 --> 01:10:19.940]  that's not the criminal side. That's the civil side. You don't have a criminal side in the federal
[01:10:19.940 --> 01:10:29.860]  level. You only have a civil side at the federal level. Oh yeah. I've never seen that. There's
[01:10:29.860 --> 01:10:38.900]  four of them. Okay. So the county case that I took all the way to the state, I have to take
[01:10:38.900 --> 01:10:45.220]  that case and file a federal court. Okay. Again, you're saying that case,
[01:10:45.220 --> 01:10:52.260]  what case, the one dealing with the citations are the one dealing with the civil lawsuit,
[01:10:53.140 --> 01:11:02.260]  the one dealing with the citation, the citations is the state criminal case against you. Right.
[01:11:03.460 --> 01:11:13.860]  Okay. You appealed that and you won the appeal. Okay. That's a lot different than getting a
[01:11:13.860 --> 01:11:23.460]  judgment. You got a judgment in your favor on a criminal appeal, assuming that it was a criminal
[01:11:23.460 --> 01:11:36.020]  suit. Right. Okay. So now I've got to take the state one, the state case with the, uh,
[01:11:36.020 --> 01:11:43.380]  citation and no, no, that's, that is not your civil suit.
[01:11:46.340 --> 01:11:53.700]  The one involving the citations is strictly between you and the state. Once that is resolved
[01:11:53.700 --> 01:12:01.860]  in your favor, now you have a civil suit you can file at the state level and possibly one
[01:12:01.860 --> 01:12:07.540]  you can file at the federal level. If federally protected rights were involved in the suit that
[01:12:07.540 --> 01:12:19.780]  you are bringing. Okay. Okay. So if you want the citation case, you can use that as the basis for
[01:12:19.780 --> 01:12:33.460]  making the claim of a rights violation by the code enforcement people. Okay. They dismissed what?
[01:12:36.660 --> 01:12:47.540]  The case with the citation, the state dismissed it that they dismissed the citations in your favor.
[01:12:47.540 --> 01:12:56.180]  That's still not your civil lawsuit. That was either their suit against you. If the,
[01:12:56.180 --> 01:13:02.340]  if the allegations were ones they had to sue you in court for as code enforcement,
[01:13:02.340 --> 01:13:08.500]  or they were criminal. If the city is allowed to make criminal allegations and statutes and, uh,
[01:13:08.500 --> 01:13:15.780]  as ordinances and, and charge you under those either way that is separate and apart from a
[01:13:15.780 --> 01:13:23.700]  lawsuit. It is what gives you standing to bring the civil lawsuit, but it is not in and of itself,
[01:13:23.700 --> 01:13:29.540]  the civil lawsuit that you have to file and you have to bring to the state court and then,
[01:13:29.540 --> 01:13:32.740]  or to the federal court. They're not the same thing.
[01:13:32.740 --> 01:13:45.220]  Well, that's what I'm asking now to you is that the county, when I went to the county court
[01:13:46.180 --> 01:13:54.900]  and then I took that case. Again, what, what case went to the county court?
[01:13:54.900 --> 01:14:05.780]  The citation. Okay. The citations that they filed against you, you went to court the first time and
[01:14:05.780 --> 01:14:12.100]  the court found against you, right? Right. The very first court they found against you.
[01:14:13.780 --> 01:14:16.580]  Right. I've, I've peeled it up to the state.
[01:14:17.780 --> 01:14:24.340]  Correct. You appealed it from there to the county. The county upheld the conviction.
[01:14:24.340 --> 01:14:29.380]  I'm assuming. Right. And then you went from there to the circuit court.
[01:14:30.820 --> 01:14:33.460]  Right. No, it went up to the state.
[01:14:35.060 --> 01:14:40.100]  Well, which I'm not familiar with the court structures in Pennsylvania. So you're going
[01:14:40.100 --> 01:14:50.580]  to have to tell me what comes after the county court. Oh, superior court, common please court.
[01:14:50.580 --> 01:14:55.300]  And is the superior court, the state court you went to, or did you go higher than that?
[01:14:55.940 --> 01:15:01.540]  Not like a middle court. You know, they, the cities have got like, uh,
[01:15:01.540 --> 01:15:07.060]  well, which court was it that it went to that said you were right and everybody else was wrong and
[01:15:07.060 --> 01:15:13.300]  send it back down. Well, that's what I was trying to explain to you that as soon as I got out of
[01:15:13.300 --> 01:15:22.980]  the county court, they found me guilty. Right. I follow a lawsuit in us district court under
[01:15:23.620 --> 01:15:31.540]  the fourth amendment. Okay. You can't file a lawsuit in dis in federal district court
[01:15:31.540 --> 01:15:38.580]  under anything until you have completed the case at the state level. What did you do with the
[01:15:38.580 --> 01:15:48.740]  citation case at the county court when they upheld it? I went to all the way up to the state court.
[01:15:50.020 --> 01:15:55.220]  Which state court? The state Pennsylvania supreme state court.
[01:15:56.260 --> 01:16:03.860]  The Pennsylvania state supreme court. Right. The highest court in your state took your
[01:16:03.860 --> 01:16:12.020]  ordinance violation case. Right. And they found in your favor and, and sent it back down.
[01:16:12.980 --> 01:16:21.140]  No, they just missed it. Uh, Jerry, you've confused the living hell out of me.
[01:16:21.940 --> 01:16:24.260]  Three different times now, three different ways.
[01:16:24.260 --> 01:16:28.980]  We can't have a conversation. If you can't keep up, we're talking about straight on both ends of
[01:16:28.980 --> 01:16:32.660]  this. Now I've got to understand what you're saying. And you've got to tell me the correct
[01:16:32.660 --> 01:16:39.460]  thing before I can understand it. So let me take this break, gather up our information here
[01:16:40.740 --> 01:16:46.180]  and walk through this again, if at all possible, to see if I can understand what got dismissed
[01:16:46.180 --> 01:16:50.660]  and what got resolved in your favor. If I can understand what got dismissed and what got resolved
[01:16:50.660 --> 01:16:55.300]  in your favor, if anything, hang on a second. We'll be right back after the break folks.
[01:17:21.380 --> 01:17:26.820]  ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. Starting in January, our first hour studies
[01:17:26.820 --> 01:17:31.860]  are in the book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse and discuss the true gospel message.
[01:17:31.860 --> 01:17:36.820]  Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine and
[01:17:36.820 --> 01:17:42.260]  Christian character development. We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with
[01:17:42.260 --> 01:17:47.940]  a hearing ear. Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness
[01:17:47.940 --> 01:17:53.780]  of our Lord and savior Jesus. So tune into scripture talk live on locals, radio network.com
[01:17:53.780 --> 01:17:58.980]  Wednesdays from eight to 10 PM to inspire and motivate your studies of the scriptures.
[01:18:00.500 --> 01:18:05.060]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.620 --> 01:18:11.220]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirras
[01:18:11.220 --> 01:18:16.020]  in federal court against debt collectors. And now you can win too. You'll get step by step
[01:18:16.020 --> 01:18:21.060]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:18:21.060 --> 01:18:26.740]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:18:26.740 --> 01:18:31.300]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them
[01:18:31.300 --> 01:18:37.460]  and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mirrasolution for how to
[01:18:37.460 --> 01:18:42.420]  stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information,
[01:18:42.420 --> 01:18:47.620]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirras banner or email
[01:18:47.620 --> 01:18:57.540]  michaelmirras@yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:18:57.540 --> 01:19:25.380]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now. As I walk through the valley of the shadow of
[01:19:25.380 --> 01:19:32.020]  debt, I take a look at my life in real life. We are back. This is rule of law radio calling
[01:19:32.020 --> 01:19:39.140]  number 5126461984 if you want to call and get in line so we can talk. All right, real quick,
[01:19:39.140 --> 01:19:45.460]  let's get back to Jerry here. All right, Jerry, I've got a problem here. I'm not following what
[01:19:45.460 --> 01:19:50.020]  you're saying and I'm not sure you follow what you're telling me as to how I can understand it
[01:19:50.020 --> 01:19:57.460]  and keep up with it. So I don't know how long I can hang on to this with you if we can't get
[01:19:57.460 --> 01:20:04.740]  this resolved on what happened. Now let's walk through this one case at a time. Do not tell me
[01:20:04.740 --> 01:20:13.940]  anything, any court, anything whatsoever about any suit except the case involving the citations.
[01:20:13.940 --> 01:20:21.540]  Okay, let's start there. Right. The case involving the citations was filed against you.
[01:20:21.540 --> 01:20:30.740]  It went to, I'm assuming the municipal court first. Right. The municipal court ruled against you.
[01:20:30.740 --> 01:20:37.780]  You then appealed it to the county court. Is that correct? Right. Once it went to the county court
[01:20:37.780 --> 01:20:45.060]  and they ruled against you, you appealed it up from there, yes or no. Right. Who did you appeal
[01:20:45.060 --> 01:20:53.380]  it to from there? To what they call superior court, the superior court. They kicked it up to the
[01:20:54.100 --> 01:21:05.300]  Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court and the Commonwealth Court. They dismissed it and I filed again
[01:21:05.300 --> 01:21:12.900]  over at the state supreme court. You filed what again? And when you say they dismissed it,
[01:21:12.900 --> 01:21:17.620]  did they dismiss your appeal or did they dismiss the case against you?
[01:21:21.140 --> 01:21:29.060]  I don't know. It came back as a dismissal. But it's got to be a dismissal of one or the other,
[01:21:29.060 --> 01:21:35.460]  Jerry. It can't be just a dismissal of who God knows what. It's either got to be a dismissal
[01:21:35.460 --> 01:21:44.340]  of the charges against you, thus giving a judgment in your favor, or it's got to be a dismissal of
[01:21:44.340 --> 01:21:52.900]  the appeal saying there's no appeal to be had here. We're done. Which is it? Boy, I can't,
[01:21:52.900 --> 01:22:00.260]  I can't. I didn't know there was two. I thought there was only one. There's only two outcomes.
[01:22:00.260 --> 01:22:07.460]  You win, you lose. Which was it? Well, the only thing I remember, it said it was a foul
[01:22:07.460 --> 01:22:14.020]  cabinet look of our life, but it was dismissed. That's what I remember seeing.
[01:22:14.020 --> 01:22:21.540]  I understand your use of the word dismiss. What I don't understand is in what context was it
[01:22:21.540 --> 01:22:27.300]  dismissed? I don't know. The only thing I remember is it was dismissed.
[01:22:28.500 --> 01:22:34.660]  Okay. Then I don't know what more to tell you about how to deal with where you're at,
[01:22:34.660 --> 01:22:38.340]  because I don't know which side of the coin you're facing right now.
[01:22:39.300 --> 01:22:44.180]  I don't know whether this dismissal was of the case against you, so the judgment was in your
[01:22:44.180 --> 01:22:50.180]  favor and you have a suit, or if it was a dismissal of your appeal saying you have no appeal,
[01:22:50.180 --> 01:22:55.620]  you lost, deal with it, and we're done. I don't know which of those two outcomes this is,
[01:22:57.620 --> 01:22:59.140]  and apparently you don't either.
[01:23:01.540 --> 01:23:07.460]  Well, it's been a while since I read the state with the state sent back.
[01:23:07.460 --> 01:23:12.580]  So, okay. Well, here's the problem. You're calling in to ask me a question about the
[01:23:12.580 --> 01:23:16.980]  status of something that even you don't know. So how am I supposed to know?
[01:23:16.980 --> 01:23:18.820]  Well, it's been a while since I looked at the state.
[01:23:19.620 --> 01:23:24.820]  Yeah, it may have been a while since you've looked at it, Jerry, but I've never looked at it. I've
[01:23:24.820 --> 01:23:28.660]  never seen it. I have no frame of reference, but what you tell me.
[01:23:28.660 --> 01:23:30.580]  I know. I know.
[01:23:30.580 --> 01:23:35.460]  And I can't make heads or tails out of what to tell you from here without that information.
[01:23:36.340 --> 01:23:43.780]  I know, but I didn't think that you would bring up the state. I knew that that was a factor in it,
[01:23:43.780 --> 01:23:49.220]  but I didn't know for sure. Again, I don't know what you mean about me bringing up the state.
[01:23:49.220 --> 01:23:54.260]  You're already in the state, so I don't know why we're talking about that as if it's something new.
[01:23:55.380 --> 01:24:02.180]  The difference here is the suit, the case against you specifically originating from the city,
[01:24:02.180 --> 01:24:07.700]  and then your case against them for illegally entering your property, assuming you've ever
[01:24:07.700 --> 01:24:14.180]  filed such a case and whether or not your filing of such a case was done in the proper place at
[01:24:14.180 --> 01:24:20.100]  the proper time without knowing the answer to what happened to the citation case itself.
[01:24:21.060 --> 01:24:26.740]  There's no way to answer how your lawsuit's going to work, and I don't have the answer to your
[01:24:26.740 --> 01:24:32.180]  citation case because I can't make heads or tails out of that with what you're telling me, and you
[01:24:32.180 --> 01:24:37.540]  haven't read it in a long time, so you don't recall which way this was and what they said.
[01:24:37.540 --> 01:24:43.700]  So what I need you to do is to go back and reread that stuff and try calling me back again next week
[01:24:43.700 --> 01:24:49.540]  once you get all that down, because right now, you've got me lost. I don't know where to go to
[01:24:49.540 --> 01:24:52.180]  tell you how to do anything because I don't know where we're at at this point.
[01:24:53.300 --> 01:24:57.220]  Okay. I did not have a review of that state case.
[01:24:57.220 --> 01:25:03.780]  I did not have a review of that state case. Well, you most certainly want to do that back here.
[01:25:03.780 --> 01:25:06.180]  Yeah. All right. Okay. Thanks, Ed.
[01:25:06.980 --> 01:25:09.460]  Yep. Thanks for calling. Okay. Bye.
[01:25:10.260 --> 01:25:17.620]  Bye-bye. All right, folks. 512-646-1984 is the calling number. If you want to give us a call
[01:25:17.620 --> 01:25:23.060]  and get in line right now, next up would appear to be Truth Raider. Raider, what can I do for you?
[01:25:23.060 --> 01:25:30.340]  Hi, Eddie. All I want to know is you sent me an email a couple of nights ago about meeting with
[01:25:30.340 --> 01:25:37.780]  James Lovett. I've got the Zoom meeting announcement and I have the passcode. So am I good? I don't need
[01:25:37.780 --> 01:25:44.500]  to do anything else. Show up. I don't need to do anything else.
[01:25:46.260 --> 01:25:51.060]  Like I said, all you have to do tomorrow is click on that link and show up.
[01:25:51.060 --> 01:25:56.900]  Okay. Yep. Just want to make sure because you meant something about email, but if I already got that.
[01:25:59.300 --> 01:26:04.660]  No, the email I'm talking about is for the people listening to the show that were not on my email
[01:26:04.660 --> 01:26:11.220]  list about the meeting. If they want to get an email to be invited to the meeting and they aren't
[01:26:11.220 --> 01:26:17.220]  someone who's in my class because my class got the email to show up.
[01:26:17.220 --> 01:26:21.780]  But the listeners out there who know nothing about this discussion are only learning about
[01:26:21.780 --> 01:26:27.540]  it on this show. So they are the ones I'm asking to send me an email if they want to participate
[01:26:27.540 --> 01:26:31.860]  and listen in. So I can send them the same info I sent to you.
[01:26:33.220 --> 01:26:44.340]  Okay. All right. Then good. Okay. All right, folks. That's all my callers. I need somebody else to
[01:26:44.340 --> 01:26:48.660]  talk to. I had several different people pop up on the board while I was reading off the information
[01:26:48.660 --> 01:26:52.660]  at the start of the show, but they dropped off and disappeared and they haven't come back yet.
[01:26:52.660 --> 01:26:56.740]  So I need somebody to talk to. If you're out there, five, one, two, six, four, six,
[01:26:56.740 --> 01:27:06.100]  1984 is the number for that. So if you want to talk, let's do that. Okay. Now while I'm waiting on
[01:27:06.100 --> 01:27:15.620]  that, I want to go back over the kinds of things that you need to be very, very wary of when it
[01:27:15.620 --> 01:27:22.660]  comes to the patronet and the protruding community giving out the disinformation that they do.
[01:27:22.660 --> 01:27:30.820]  Let's cover this list of idiocy. The state, national, national of the United States BS,
[01:27:30.820 --> 01:27:40.100]  which is what I talked about tonight, the accepted for value BS, the postmaster general BS,
[01:27:41.700 --> 01:27:54.260]  the Pope and the queen of England BS. Okay. The UCC information BS. Okay. Now let me tell you one
[01:27:54.260 --> 01:28:01.460]  thing about the UCC. There is one thing in the UCC that is actually helpful and applicable in
[01:28:01.460 --> 01:28:08.500]  relation to my information on the transportation code. And that is the, the statutory definition
[01:28:08.500 --> 01:28:15.140]  of what constitutes personal goods. Okay. Or household goods. And the reason it's helpful
[01:28:15.140 --> 01:28:21.060]  and applicable is, is because as we all know, the transportation code defines what a vehicle is,
[01:28:21.060 --> 01:28:26.100]  what a motor vehicle is, what a commercial motor vehicle is. And all three of those definitions
[01:28:26.100 --> 01:28:31.700]  relate specifically and strictly to the context of transportation, which we know is defined as a,
[01:28:31.700 --> 01:28:37.700]  the movement of passengers or property from one point to another for compensation or hire by a
[01:28:37.700 --> 01:28:47.620]  carrier. Okay. So we need to know what's a carrier and whether or not that care, uh, and the fact
[01:28:47.620 --> 01:28:53.780]  that it's being done for compensation or hire. So that can be anybody that's charging a fee to move
[01:28:53.780 --> 01:28:59.060]  persons or property from one place to another. All right. Taxi cab, shuttle buses, truck drivers,
[01:29:00.180 --> 01:29:07.620]  any sort of ground transportation other than railroad. All right. So given that
[01:29:08.900 --> 01:29:14.580]  the definition of household goods and the fact that our automobile for purposes of
[01:29:14.580 --> 01:29:23.140]  law under the UCC is considered household good and the UCC governs commercial activities such as
[01:29:23.140 --> 01:29:32.100]  the movement of persons and property on the highways and shipping things like from one place
[01:29:32.100 --> 01:29:39.380]  to another and how the courts have said that in that context, a person's car and among other things
[01:29:39.380 --> 01:29:45.540]  are considered household goods because they are for strictly personal use. Okay. That's the court
[01:29:45.540 --> 01:29:52.260]  decision. So as far as the personal use versus commercial, that's how it would fit in. All right.
[01:29:52.260 --> 01:29:57.860]  Five, one, two, six, four, six, 1984. We will be right back. It seems like everywhere you turn
[01:29:57.860 --> 01:30:02.340]  nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number and date of birth, but you should think
[01:30:02.340 --> 01:30:07.140]  twice before giving away your personal data. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a
[01:30:07.140 --> 01:30:12.980]  moment. Google is watching you recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive
[01:30:12.980 --> 01:30:18.260]  database of your personal information. That's creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:18.260 --> 01:30:23.620]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. Startpage.com doesn't store your IP
[01:30:23.620 --> 01:30:28.260]  address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and they're third party certified.
[01:30:28.260 --> 01:30:33.540]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. Great search results
[01:30:33.540 --> 01:30:39.780]  and total privacy. Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. Forms, forms, forms.
[01:30:39.780 --> 01:30:44.500]  They're everywhere, but just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have
[01:30:44.500 --> 01:30:50.500]  to give it. I leave blank spaces on forms all the time or I write N slash A for not applicable and
[01:30:50.500 --> 01:30:56.500]  usually nobody notices or cares. I never give my social security number or date of birth to
[01:30:56.500 --> 01:31:01.460]  people. I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory
[01:31:01.460 --> 01:31:06.100]  for employment or a government requirement and I won't give my phone number to a company or an
[01:31:06.100 --> 01:31:10.500]  organization unless I actually want them to call me and that's pretty rare. To preserve our
[01:31:10.500 --> 01:31:16.020]  vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests. It's like exercising a
[01:31:16.020 --> 01:31:21.300]  muscle. It gets easier the more you do it. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information
[01:31:21.300 --> 01:31:36.180]  at CatherineAlbrecht.com I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11th, 2001. Most
[01:31:36.180 --> 01:31:41.860]  people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th. World Trade Center 7, a 47 story
[01:31:41.860 --> 01:31:46.820]  skyscraper was not hit by a plane. Although the official explanation is that fire brought down
[01:31:46.820 --> 01:31:52.100]  Building 7, over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there
[01:31:52.100 --> 01:31:58.660]  is more to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son. Go to buildingwhat.org
[01:31:58.660 --> 01:32:04.820]  why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of
[01:32:04.820 --> 01:32:09.060]  Law traffic seminar. In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society and if we the people
[01:32:09.060 --> 01:32:13.540]  are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.540 --> 01:32:17.220]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[01:32:17.220 --> 01:32:21.620]  private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us
[01:32:21.620 --> 01:32:25.620]  the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due
[01:32:25.620 --> 01:32:29.700]  process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put
[01:32:29.700 --> 01:32:33.460]  together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due
[01:32:33.460 --> 01:32:37.860]  process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable
[01:32:37.860 --> 01:32:42.100]  material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now,
[01:32:42.100 --> 01:32:46.020]  you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:32:46.020 --> 01:32:50.500]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful
[01:32:50.500 --> 01:32:53.780]  resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from
[01:32:53.780 --> 01:32:58.900]  ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want
[01:32:58.900 --> 01:33:12.740]  and deserve. You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:29.060 --> 01:33:38.100]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:33:38.100 --> 01:33:44.100]  This is April 10th, 2023. We are live tonight and I have several callers up on the board now.
[01:33:44.660 --> 01:33:52.260]  I appear to have one that's a new caller, area code 423. Who am I talking to and where are you from?
[01:33:52.260 --> 01:33:58.660]  Hi, good afternoon, Eddie Craig. Hey, this is Mike from Tennessee.
[01:34:00.100 --> 01:34:05.220]  Mike from Tennessee? Yes, sir. Okay, Mike, what can I do for you?
[01:34:06.500 --> 01:34:12.180]  Hey, we chatted back from February about a couple months ago. You remember I was talking
[01:34:12.180 --> 01:34:20.020]  about some old boys up there in New Boston, Texas? I don't recall, refresh my memory.
[01:34:20.020 --> 01:34:27.380]  You know, the Walmart, they got this Rico distortion racket going on up there
[01:34:28.100 --> 01:34:33.460]  where they're jacking up store truck drivers coming down there to that Walmart.
[01:34:34.500 --> 01:34:39.940]  Oh, okay. You're the one that got hit on that back street coming there. It doesn't have a sign in
[01:34:39.940 --> 01:34:47.300]  the right place. Well, it's not a back street. It's off the main drag. It's just a road.
[01:34:47.300 --> 01:34:52.740]  Well, it's a street that isn't the main thoroughfare. Let me just put it that way.
[01:34:54.500 --> 01:34:57.860]  And it's off the main thoroughfare, but it's not the main thoroughfare.
[01:34:59.300 --> 01:35:08.660]  Right. They're operating a legal distortion racket. So I didn't give them what you say
[01:35:08.660 --> 01:35:12.100]  because that's been trying to give them jurisdiction. I wouldn't have found
[01:35:12.100 --> 01:35:18.020]  that they do not have subject matter jurisdiction because the city courts,
[01:35:18.740 --> 01:35:25.860]  according to the state of Texas, there's city administrative court and class C misdemeanors
[01:35:27.380 --> 01:35:32.580]  in the state of Texas are considered traffic tickets are considered class C misdemeanor.
[01:35:32.580 --> 01:35:41.300]  So that's yeah. And how do you get that? Chapter 45 and the code of criminal procedure
[01:35:41.300 --> 01:35:46.580]  expressly gives municipal courts, jurisdiction over class C, find only cases within their
[01:35:46.580 --> 01:35:52.660]  jurisdiction. So where are you getting the idea that they didn't?
[01:35:52.660 --> 01:35:58.820]  It doesn't give them subject matter jurisdiction over traffic cases. I looked at it in section 45
[01:35:58.820 --> 01:36:04.020]  of the Texas government code. So they don't have subject matter jurisdiction. What happened with
[01:36:04.020 --> 01:36:13.220]  that case up there after several harassment times, I had to go up there at the third time.
[01:36:15.300 --> 01:36:23.380]  I filed that with the court, went there on that, I think it was March 9th and the old boy said
[01:36:23.380 --> 01:36:29.300]  his hands was tied. And I said, well, I wouldn't have him to dismiss the case. The only thing he
[01:36:29.300 --> 01:36:36.580]  can do is dismiss it ministerially. He said, no, I won't stand it to the AOC. And whatever they do
[01:36:36.580 --> 01:36:43.620]  with it, they do with it. So you're free to go for right now. Now you said chapter 45 of the
[01:36:43.620 --> 01:36:50.580]  government code. I don't have it right with me, Eddie. I have the document in the truck. I don't
[01:36:50.580 --> 01:36:57.460]  have it right there with me, but I know I read it. State of Texas, class C misdemeanors, traffic
[01:36:57.460 --> 01:37:03.380]  tickets are considered class C misdemeanors. City courts have subject matter jurisdiction
[01:37:03.380 --> 01:37:09.780]  over them traffic offenses. It talks about other offenses, but it doesn't talk about
[01:37:09.780 --> 01:37:15.460]  traffic offenses. Okay. I need to know exactly where it is you're talking about,
[01:37:15.460 --> 01:37:22.660]  because everything I've read says differently. So if you found something that contradicts that,
[01:37:22.660 --> 01:37:31.140]  it would be very nice to know. I will contact you tomorrow. I tried calling you and I know you're
[01:37:31.140 --> 01:37:36.500]  busy, but I tried calling you and I haven't, I don't have any missed calls on my phone.
[01:37:36.500 --> 01:37:44.580]  So whatever number you're calling ain't mine. Well, shoot me. No, no way. I emailed you.
[01:37:44.580 --> 01:37:52.580]  I emailed you about two or three times. And I remember you sent me some documents on tail law,
[01:37:54.020 --> 01:38:00.420]  but I didn't give him, go that route because I'm not going to plead not guilty by reason of
[01:38:00.420 --> 01:38:04.740]  traffic because that's given that court jurisdiction. I'm not going to give him
[01:38:04.740 --> 01:38:09.540]  jurisdiction. Well, I never told you to enter a plea. That was never anything I told you to do.
[01:38:09.540 --> 01:38:15.700]  No, no, you said, you said, please not guilty by a reason of entrapping.
[01:38:16.580 --> 01:38:22.340]  And I didn't do that. And I found a subject, this court has no subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:38:22.340 --> 01:38:26.980]  And that's where I all tied them at because he knows he didn't have subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:38:26.980 --> 01:38:33.300]  I had gotten an old boy admitted on the bench on February the 2nd. He admitted that he did not have
[01:38:33.300 --> 01:38:36.740]  subject matter jurisdiction. So he was, he said, what you want me to do,
[01:38:36.740 --> 01:38:42.180]  want me to send it to the district court. Okay. What email address did you send me an email under?
[01:38:44.740 --> 01:38:49.860]  The one, the one I got from you. No, no, no, your email address.
[01:38:49.860 --> 01:38:52.020]  Just give me the first part of your email address.
[01:38:52.020 --> 01:39:09.460]  Uh, K A W I, K A W I, uh, seven. Okay. Uh, let's see. I got one from you January 10th
[01:39:09.460 --> 01:39:19.780]  and two from you February 2nd. There you go. That's me. Uh, yeah, but I don't,
[01:39:19.780 --> 01:39:28.980]  I don't see anything in here about a statute. We talked on January 10th and that was my, uh,
[01:39:28.980 --> 01:39:34.660]  my first, uh, appearance. I had a court date on the 12th, which they, uh, uh,
[01:39:34.660 --> 01:39:39.620]  canceled at the last minute, uh, had me come all the way up there and they had canceled it.
[01:39:41.860 --> 01:39:47.300]  Well, I see that you say that you said the clerk calls you at 12 37, three hours after we talked
[01:39:47.300 --> 01:39:52.580]  and tells me she talked to the judge and had the court reschedule the appearance. Uh, but again,
[01:39:52.580 --> 01:39:58.580]  there's no statute that's referenced in this email either. No, I didn't send you a statue
[01:39:58.580 --> 01:40:03.380]  at that time. I didn't send you a statue. Okay. Well, what I'm saying is I don't have
[01:40:03.380 --> 01:40:07.860]  any email that tells me what statute you're saying says what you're saying.
[01:40:09.300 --> 01:40:14.580]  So if you have that, it would be very nice if you would email that to me so I can look at it.
[01:40:14.580 --> 01:40:18.340]  Sure. Sure. That's what I'm telling you. That's what I'm telling you.
[01:40:18.340 --> 01:40:22.580]  Okay. Because chapter 45 of the code of criminal procedure
[01:40:23.380 --> 01:40:25.460]  says the exact opposite of what you're saying,
[01:40:27.860 --> 01:40:32.980]  but it speaks generally of class C fine only offenses. If you've got something that
[01:40:32.980 --> 01:40:40.100]  specifically says with the exception of traffic class C fine only offenses, I would love to see
[01:40:40.100 --> 01:40:48.980]  that. It doesn't talk about, uh, classy misdemeanors involving traffic cases.
[01:40:48.980 --> 01:40:55.140]  Again, I don't know what you're talking about. Doesn't say that I need to see what you're reading
[01:40:55.140 --> 01:41:04.740]  in order to see if what you're reading is accurate. Cause you say chapter 45 and I only know of one
[01:41:04.740 --> 01:41:09.060]  chapter 45 that deals with municipal courts. Now, if you've got it and you say it's chapter
[01:41:09.060 --> 01:41:15.700]  45 of the government code, well, what chapter 45 of the government code deals with prosecuting
[01:41:15.700 --> 01:41:22.100]  attorneys, specifically county attorneys. He doesn't, he doesn't, uh, uh, tape record.
[01:41:22.100 --> 01:41:25.540]  That's where the court is arbitrary. Cause they don't have any tape recording.
[01:41:26.340 --> 01:41:28.740]  Well, if they're not courts of records, you're right.
[01:41:29.700 --> 01:41:37.540]  The district, the DA, uh, he's even show up along with the cop two times. And another thing
[01:41:37.540 --> 01:41:42.340]  that little, uh, ticket they get there, that's not an affidavit sworn affidavit complaint.
[01:41:42.340 --> 01:41:49.220]  So the whole idea of my call is they're acting on the storage and rack it up there.
[01:41:49.780 --> 01:41:55.460]  Well, if you'll remember on our call, I told you, this is exactly what they would do. They would
[01:41:55.460 --> 01:42:01.140]  try to call you in the, in the court multiple times with nothing to actually do just to wear
[01:42:01.140 --> 01:42:08.020]  you down. This is what they do. And this is how they do it. Remember me telling you that
[01:42:09.700 --> 01:42:14.740]  it's a racket. It's a torture. It is a racket. It's a complete racket. It's all about generating
[01:42:14.740 --> 01:42:18.740]  revenue for them. That's all it's ever been about that county there. Right. Well, see,
[01:42:18.740 --> 01:42:25.060]  that's the thing, uh, uh, we have to get them exposed, uh, and cause, uh, going well, that's
[01:42:25.060 --> 01:42:29.300]  because that's what I'm working on. But like I said, the information I have,
[01:42:29.300 --> 01:42:33.940]  Charlie says, you know, different than what the information is you're giving me. So if you're
[01:42:33.940 --> 01:42:39.380]  saying you found something that says they can't try these cases there, then I want to see it.
[01:42:41.060 --> 01:42:46.580]  Give me a call tomorrow. Uh, and I'll, I'll send it to you. Give me a call tomorrow.
[01:42:47.940 --> 01:42:53.140]  Uh, I'll see what I can do. Uh, I can't guarantee anything. Cause I got a parcel of dogs. I'm
[01:42:53.140 --> 01:42:57.860]  training here, uh, for the next few weeks. So, but I'll see what I can do.
[01:42:57.860 --> 01:43:04.900]  But I'll see what I can do. All right. What would you say though?
[01:43:05.540 --> 01:43:10.260]  I said, I will do my best. I can't guarantee. I'll give you a call because I got a parcel of
[01:43:10.260 --> 01:43:15.940]  dogs. I'm training here this for the next couple of weeks. Well, if you want the information,
[01:43:15.940 --> 01:43:20.820]  you're going to have to give me. I understand. And I will do my very best to call you tomorrow.
[01:43:20.820 --> 01:43:29.140]  Okay. But like I said, uh, uh, uh, I call them at it and expose them and this thing has not even
[01:43:29.140 --> 01:43:34.180]  been adopted in the city charter. So they've been doing this for over 20 years, uh, building up
[01:43:34.180 --> 01:43:41.060]  revenue out there and getting money off of a truck driver. Okay. Why is it you can't email this to me?
[01:43:41.060 --> 01:43:53.940]  Hello, you can't email it to me. All right, folks, hang on. We've got to take another break and I'll
[01:43:53.940 --> 01:44:04.820]  be right back. Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the
[01:44:04.820 --> 01:44:10.260]  area of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time we changed
[01:44:10.260 --> 01:44:17.380]  all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition
[01:44:17.380 --> 01:44:21.620]  in a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated.
[01:44:22.180 --> 01:44:28.340]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse
[01:44:28.340 --> 01:44:34.180]  all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Young Jevity so much.
[01:44:34.180 --> 01:44:40.580]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order
[01:44:40.580 --> 01:44:47.380]  from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.380 --> 01:44:52.900]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[01:44:52.900 --> 01:44:58.260]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:58.260 --> 01:45:05.780]  Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[01:45:05.780 --> 01:45:12.180]  with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course that will show you how
[01:45:12.180 --> 01:45:19.380]  in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you
[01:45:19.380 --> 01:45:25.220]  don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step
[01:45:25.220 --> 01:45:32.100]  course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years
[01:45:32.100 --> 01:45:38.100]  of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should
[01:45:38.100 --> 01:45:43.780]  understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive
[01:45:43.780 --> 01:45:51.460]  our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much
[01:45:51.460 --> 01:46:00.100]  more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:11.220 --> 01:46:16.260]  All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. We are now in the last segment of the
[01:46:16.260 --> 01:46:19.940]  show. I still got people on the board, and I'm going to try to get all of you. So let's keep this
[01:46:19.940 --> 01:46:26.180]  as succinct as possible to get your answers in. All right, I need to talk to Marty in Minnesota.
[01:46:26.180 --> 01:46:32.740]  Marty, what can I do for you? Hey, Eddie. I was just calling to see what you knew about this term.
[01:46:34.020 --> 01:46:39.940]  It's not defined in statute, but the term general criminal law. So I was trying to figure out what
[01:46:39.940 --> 01:46:44.740]  they mean by this in statute when it's not defined. You know anything about this term?
[01:46:44.740 --> 01:46:51.780]  The general criminal laws will be any law that covers a broad swath without specific details,
[01:46:51.780 --> 01:47:00.580]  such as the penal code are the general criminal laws in most states. That's what I was figuring,
[01:47:00.580 --> 01:47:11.940]  too. And then you have the regulatory penal laws, which are the criminal penalties that are attached
[01:47:11.940 --> 01:47:20.340]  to given regulated subjects like the water code and building code and all this kind of stuff,
[01:47:20.340 --> 01:47:23.380]  the transportation code, the motor vehicle code, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:47:24.900 --> 01:47:28.580]  Right. So you would say that the general criminal laws are not those.
[01:47:30.020 --> 01:47:35.060]  No, the general laws are the ones that are applicable to everybody. The regulatory laws
[01:47:35.060 --> 01:47:39.220]  are the ones that are applicable only to the class of persons to which they were specifically
[01:47:39.220 --> 01:47:46.980]  written to apply, i.e. those that are actually regulated by the law in question because they're
[01:47:46.980 --> 01:47:53.380]  engaged in a particular activity, a privileged activity that that regulatory scheme governs.
[01:47:56.180 --> 01:48:02.180]  Huh. Yeah. All right. Well, that kind of answers it. I know you got other calls,
[01:48:02.180 --> 01:48:05.540]  so I'll just let you go after that. I just wanted to confirm that.
[01:48:05.540 --> 01:48:10.260]  All right. Well, I appreciate the call. Thanks. Yeah. Thank you. Bye.
[01:48:11.060 --> 01:48:15.460]  Bye. All right. Now we have John in Texas. John, what can we do for you?
[01:48:16.900 --> 01:48:25.300]  Yeah, Eddie, I'm a long time listener. But my question for you is a while back on one
[01:48:25.300 --> 01:48:32.340]  of your shows, you referenced about the state legislature when they passed the state bar stuff
[01:48:32.340 --> 01:48:39.220]  that you saw the paper on that exposing. Yes, I have a white paper on that that I wrote.
[01:48:40.420 --> 01:48:46.100]  Yeah. I've searched all over your WordPress and then website stuff trying to find that.
[01:48:46.980 --> 01:48:49.300]  Is it posted somewhere where I could read it?
[01:48:51.540 --> 01:48:57.140]  It is actually. But if you want a copy of it, all you got to do is send me an email asking for it.
[01:48:57.140 --> 01:49:03.380]  Just ask for the white paper on the Texas State Bar Act, and I will reply back with a copy of it.
[01:49:04.580 --> 01:49:11.620]  OK. Well, real good. I'm going to send you an email this evening and requesting a link
[01:49:11.620 --> 01:49:17.460]  to the deal tomorrow night and also. Well, it'll be a PDF. It'll be in the document you get.
[01:49:17.460 --> 01:49:21.380]  I'll send back to you. Well, my reply will contain the PDF. All you got to do is save
[01:49:21.380 --> 01:49:28.500]  the attachment off and you got it. OK, very good. Thank you. OK. Have a good. Yes, sir. You too.
[01:49:29.460 --> 01:49:34.100]  Also, FYI, those of you that sent me an email already for the meeting tomorrow,
[01:49:34.100 --> 01:49:39.460]  I saw some of the emails there. I will send out that the information for that at the end of the
[01:49:39.460 --> 01:49:46.100]  show. OK, so don't think I haven't seen that you've done it. I appreciate it. Tell everybody else
[01:49:46.100 --> 01:49:51.700]  that, you know, that has an interest in this stuff to send me an email and be there for this,
[01:49:52.260 --> 01:49:58.100]  because this is going to be educational. It may be long. It may not be long if he bolts and runs
[01:49:58.100 --> 01:50:04.500]  to cover his butt. It won't be long, but if he tries to stay and hash this out, it's either
[01:50:04.500 --> 01:50:10.180]  going to be a long drawn out discussion or it's going to be a long drawn out main calling session
[01:50:10.180 --> 01:50:16.420]  from his side because he doesn't want to lose his income either way. It's going to be fun for me.
[01:50:16.420 --> 01:50:21.300]  OK, so if you want to participate, I got the emails you've already sent, but if you know
[01:50:21.300 --> 01:50:26.100]  somebody else that won't that might want to attend, please make sure you share it with them and get
[01:50:26.100 --> 01:50:32.180]  them in there. This is not just me, folks. If you know somebody that would like to be there,
[01:50:32.180 --> 01:50:38.420]  send them the email. I send you forward it over to them. Tell them to use it. Like I say, I can
[01:50:38.420 --> 01:50:44.660]  accommodate up to 100 people in this thing right now. So first come first served if we go over that
[01:50:44.660 --> 01:50:52.420]  number. I doubt we will, but just in case we do. All right. That said, we have John in New York.
[01:50:52.420 --> 01:50:58.100]  John, what do you got? 30 seconds is all this is going to take. It's a medical
[01:50:59.940 --> 01:51:06.580]  and it's a warning. They are planning. They're in the planning stages as far as I know
[01:51:06.580 --> 01:51:18.260]  of taking vegetables like lettuce. And putting the same idea, the same vaccines, basically
[01:51:18.260 --> 01:51:28.980]  like the covid vaccine into the lettuce with MRNA technology. Also livestock, the same thing. So if
[01:51:28.980 --> 01:51:37.060]  you didn't get a covid shot, they plan on forcing you to get it through the food supply.
[01:51:38.100 --> 01:51:46.260]  That's number one. And then the last 10 seconds. It's my understanding and I have to research this.
[01:51:47.380 --> 01:51:56.420]  It's my understanding that they've already shot pork up with MRNA technology. And this is,
[01:51:56.420 --> 01:52:06.420]  and this is, I don't know what type of shots they are, but supposedly they have already shot up pork
[01:52:07.140 --> 01:52:13.700]  with the MRNA technology. Now I have to verify that because I just came upon that today.
[01:52:14.740 --> 01:52:19.060]  So that's basically it. If you didn't get an MRNA shot and you don't want one,
[01:52:19.060 --> 01:52:24.020]  you better call your congressman. And if they're Republicans, they'll probably do nothing.
[01:52:24.020 --> 01:52:28.500]  But, and if they're Democrats, they're the ones that are behind this. So that's it.
[01:52:30.740 --> 01:52:37.780]  Okay. Well, I saw the thing talking about that as well. At least I saw something
[01:52:37.780 --> 01:52:45.060]  talking about that as well. And okay, what, what'd you get? I'm sorry. What'd you hear?
[01:52:47.140 --> 01:52:50.980]  Well, I heard that they may try to put the same
[01:52:50.980 --> 01:52:55.940]  info stuff into certain types of fruits and vegetables and the, and the food supply.
[01:52:56.500 --> 01:53:03.300]  But what I haven't seen is anything that's a reliable, verifiable source of that information.
[01:53:03.780 --> 01:53:08.260]  I've seen somebody put it out there and I wouldn't put it past them to do it.
[01:53:09.300 --> 01:53:14.580]  But this is why growing your own food is a much better option than buying it.
[01:53:15.780 --> 01:53:17.540]  Oh yeah. Oh yeah.
[01:53:17.540 --> 01:53:22.740]  Oh yeah. Well, that's all I have to say, I guess right now.
[01:53:24.100 --> 01:53:27.860]  Okay. Well, I appreciate the call and thank you.
[01:53:28.820 --> 01:53:29.940]  Do you have any other calls?
[01:53:31.460 --> 01:53:32.660]  I do not at the moment.
[01:53:34.020 --> 01:53:40.260]  Okay. When you get one, let me know. I can give you some more information. Dr. Ryan Artis,
[01:53:40.260 --> 01:53:49.380]  A-R-D-I-S, A-R-D-I-S, Dr. Brian Artis. I'm getting this from him.
[01:53:50.340 --> 01:53:51.700]  That's D as in David.
[01:53:52.740 --> 01:54:01.220]  D as in David, right. A-R-D-I-S. He says, for people who got COVID infections
[01:54:02.020 --> 01:54:08.260]  and who lost their sense of smell, they have discovered that Nicorette gum and gums like it.
[01:54:08.260 --> 01:54:15.060]  If I'm getting this right, Nicorette gum will help to restore the sense of smell.
[01:54:15.940 --> 01:54:17.940]  Well, who is Dr. Artis?
[01:54:19.380 --> 01:54:25.860]  He's a medical doctor and researcher and he's sort of like E.F. Hutton. When E.F. Hutton talks.
[01:54:25.860 --> 01:54:31.220]  Well, the same people, there are plenty of people that are medical doctors that are telling you to
[01:54:31.220 --> 01:54:34.820]  take this crap. So again, who is Dr. Artis?
[01:54:34.820 --> 01:54:37.460]  He's a medical researcher. He's a medical doctor and researcher.
[01:54:38.500 --> 01:54:38.980]  Okay.
[01:54:38.980 --> 01:54:40.740]  And so far, most of what he's-
[01:54:40.740 --> 01:54:41.380]  For who?
[01:54:44.180 --> 01:54:47.140]  He's a medical doctor and researcher for who?
[01:54:49.220 --> 01:54:50.740]  For himself. He is-
[01:54:52.900 --> 01:54:55.140]  So he works only for himself?
[01:54:56.420 --> 01:55:02.340]  I don't know. We'll have to ask him. I'll call him. I call everybody else. Why not call him?
[01:55:02.340 --> 01:55:07.060]  I call everybody else. Why not call him? I should interview him.
[01:55:07.060 --> 01:55:07.780]  Be my guest.
[01:55:09.460 --> 01:55:13.540]  So anyway, Dr. Brian Artis has said that. Now, you got to be careful.
[01:55:13.540 --> 01:55:15.780]  Always check with your doctor first.
[01:55:17.300 --> 01:55:20.660]  I don't have a doctor. I don't check with my doctor for anything.
[01:55:21.300 --> 01:55:27.060]  If crap falls off of me or gets blown off me or gets cut off me, the doctor would still
[01:55:27.060 --> 01:55:32.900]  be hard put to find me in his waiting room.
[01:55:37.460 --> 01:55:41.860]  I can tell. We don't like the system. None of us do.
[01:55:44.340 --> 01:55:48.980]  Well, I just figure if I'm going to die, I'd rather go out on my own terms than theirs.
[01:55:48.980 --> 01:55:56.020]  Oh, yeah. Yeah. You'll be a lot happier, too, along the way.
[01:55:56.820 --> 01:55:57.860]  Well, that's the plan.
[01:56:00.020 --> 01:56:10.820]  Well, for anybody who catches COVID or they're worried about catching COVID-
[01:56:10.820 --> 01:56:13.860]  Okay, John, sorry. I do have another caller up on the board, man.
[01:56:14.900 --> 01:56:16.980]  Okay, go right ahead. Thank you.
[01:56:16.980 --> 01:56:23.540]  All right. Thanks. All right, Stephen in Texas. Stephen, you got two minutes, or less than two
[01:56:23.540 --> 01:56:24.820]  minutes. What can I do for you?
[01:56:25.620 --> 01:56:31.540]  No problem. I missed the first part of the show and I only to catch the part about you got
[01:56:31.540 --> 01:56:35.860]  something going on tomorrow night. And when you just restated it, I didn't catch what the subject
[01:56:35.860 --> 01:56:37.460]  matter is. What's the deal? The bar?
[01:56:37.460 --> 01:56:42.580]  The subject matter is, is I have a meeting with a gentleman who is promoting this change your
[01:56:42.580 --> 01:56:50.500]  status to a state national or American national BS, among other things, accepted for value and
[01:56:50.500 --> 01:56:54.820]  all this other kind of crap. And he's selling people bogus paperwork that's going to put him
[01:56:54.820 --> 01:57:06.660]  in a federal prison. So I reached out to him because he was using my Infowars video to present
[01:57:06.660 --> 01:57:12.820]  a video of his own, trying to use my information to make people think that his information was
[01:57:12.820 --> 01:57:19.460]  valid. Right. And so I reached out to him and said, we need to have a discussion about your
[01:57:19.460 --> 01:57:25.460]  interpretation of what's going on in my video. What I didn't tell him was that I intend to also
[01:57:25.460 --> 01:57:30.820]  have a discussion about the crap he's promoting. And if he brings people with him that are
[01:57:30.820 --> 01:57:35.300]  listening to him, hopefully get them to see the light of David's light. And he's going to
[01:57:35.300 --> 01:57:42.180]  get them to see the light of day before they go to jail. So my goal here is to get everybody who
[01:57:42.180 --> 01:57:48.660]  wants to be in that meeting and get the education they need to send me an email asking to join the
[01:57:48.660 --> 01:57:58.820]  zoom meeting tomorrow at 7pm central standard time. They send it to Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com
[01:57:58.820 --> 01:58:04.420]  and the replies send back, send that to anybody else. You know, that may want to participate.
[01:58:04.420 --> 01:58:08.980]  I've got a hundred slots. I can feel. So it's going to be first come first served. If we go
[01:58:08.980 --> 01:58:17.140]  over that number. All right. Yes, sir. You have a great night. All right folks. It's been the
[01:58:17.140 --> 01:58:21.380]  Monday night rule of law radio show with your host Eddie Craig. I hope everybody had a good time and
[01:58:21.380 --> 01:58:25.620]  felt like they got some good information. And I hope that if you're out there listening to this,
[01:58:25.620 --> 01:58:30.900]  you will send me an email and be in tomorrow. Nice meeting you folks. Have a great week. Good night.
[01:58:30.900 --> 01:58:34.900]  And God bless.
[01:58:50.100 --> 01:58:56.580]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free. A unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.580 --> 01:59:02.020]  recovery version. The New Testament recovery version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.020 --> 01:59:08.100]  what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.100 --> 01:59:16.420]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.420 --> 01:59:24.740]  or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000
[01:59:24.740 --> 01:59:30.500]  cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is
[01:59:30.500 --> 01:59:35.620]  truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version,
[01:59:35.620 --> 01:59:48.900]  call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:48.900 --> 01:59:56.100]  Be looking for some truth. You found it. Logosradio network.com.