[00:00.000 --> 00:05.680] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [00:05.680 --> 00:09.360] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [00:09.360 --> 00:10.840] Our liberty depends on it. [00:10.840 --> 00:14.760] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [00:14.760 --> 00:16.880] your First Amendment rights. [00:16.880 --> 00:18.480] Privacy is under attack. [00:18.480 --> 00:22.080] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:22.080 --> 00:26.840] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:26.840 --> 00:31.920] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [00:31.920 --> 00:34.600] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:34.600 --> 00:38.920] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [00:38.920 --> 00:42.440] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [00:42.440 --> 00:44.560] Start over with StartPage. [00:44.560 --> 00:47.720] SPAR, it's what fighters do. [00:47.720 --> 00:51.200] It's also how I remember the five guarantees of the First Amendment. [00:51.200 --> 00:56.520] If you plan to take away my rights, I'm going to SPAR with you, SPAR with an extra P. [00:56.520 --> 01:03.000] S for speech, P for press, another P for petition, A for assembly, and R for religion. [01:03.000 --> 01:06.920] Most Americans are familiar with the First Amendment guarantees of free speech, press, [01:06.920 --> 01:08.440] assembly, and religion. [01:08.440 --> 01:10.800] But petition for redress is another matter. [01:10.800 --> 01:14.520] We have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [01:14.520 --> 01:17.880] It means that if we're unhappy with what's going on in our government, we can spell [01:17.880 --> 01:21.240] out the reasons without fear of being thrown into jail. [01:21.240 --> 01:22.680] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:22.680 --> 01:31.000] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31.000 --> 01:34.680] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:34.680 --> 01:38.160] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:38.160 --> 01:39.640] Our liberty depends on it. [01:39.640 --> 01:43.520] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember [01:43.520 --> 01:46.640] one of your constitutional rights. [01:46.640 --> 01:48.240] Privacy is under attack. [01:48.240 --> 01:51.840] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:51.840 --> 01:56.600] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:56.600 --> 02:01.760] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [02:01.760 --> 02:04.360] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [02:04.360 --> 02:08.640] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [02:08.640 --> 02:12.160] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [02:12.160 --> 02:15.760] Start over with StartPage. [02:15.760 --> 02:20.120] When I think of the Second Amendment, I visualize myself wrapping my two arms around the Bill [02:20.120 --> 02:22.200] of Rights in a big old bear hug. [02:22.200 --> 02:26.680] It's how I remember that the Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bear arms. [02:26.680 --> 02:30.560] Arms that embrace our freedoms and won't let anyone take them away without a fight. [02:30.560 --> 02:31.560] Get it? [02:31.560 --> 02:32.560] Two arms? [02:32.560 --> 02:33.560] Bear hug? [02:33.560 --> 02:34.560] Bear arms? [02:34.560 --> 02:37.520] The late Senator Hubert Humphrey captured the spirit of the Second Amendment so well [02:37.520 --> 02:42.240] when he said, the right of the citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against [02:42.240 --> 02:47.440] arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote in America, [02:47.440 --> 02:50.520] but which historically has proved to always be possible. [02:50.520 --> 03:19.840] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:20.520 --> 03:50.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [03:50.320 --> 04:19.400] Okay, howdy, howdy, Brandon Kelton, Brett Fatt out in the Rural Radio on this, the 16th [04:19.400 --> 04:31.920] of March, 2023, and we're going to start out with Brett messing with the federal courts. [04:31.920 --> 04:32.920] With me? [04:32.920 --> 04:37.520] Well, yeah, tell us, tell us about your appeal to that. [04:37.520 --> 04:38.520] Okay. [04:38.520 --> 04:48.400] Well, this appeal is from the federal district court to federal circuit, what do they call [04:48.400 --> 04:49.400] it? [04:49.400 --> 05:01.880] Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, and this is on my accusation, I sued a lawyer for a whole [05:01.880 --> 05:02.880] bunch of lies. [05:02.880 --> 05:08.480] He, he stacked up so much aggravated perjury that it just got under my skin and I said, [05:08.480 --> 05:15.840] well, he's not allowed to do these crimes and I took him to the feds and said, look, [05:15.840 --> 05:24.120] this is a deprivation of my, my inherent and constitutionally protected due process rights. [05:24.120 --> 05:29.600] I can't have this guy over here doing all this lying and he's deceiving the court and [05:29.600 --> 05:33.360] the court believed him and I was harmed thereby. [05:33.360 --> 05:39.360] And they, the federal district court sat on this for a really long time. [05:39.360 --> 05:48.400] They gave the defendants an extension of time to answer since they failed to answer and, [05:48.400 --> 05:54.680] and that way they could, the next day after it was the deadline to answer, I filed a motion [05:54.680 --> 06:01.480] for default judgment, but they didn't rule on that until after they gave an extension [06:01.480 --> 06:09.960] to the defendants and then said the, the default is moot. [06:09.960 --> 06:17.280] Well, they went on and on with nonsense like this for a long time and the magistrate judge [06:17.280 --> 06:21.440] was involving herself without any lawful authority. [06:21.440 --> 06:27.720] So then I started going after the magistrate judge and several other things in the same, [06:27.720 --> 06:33.040] well, you know, while I have a case open, I went ahead and dealt with several issues [06:33.040 --> 06:40.120] like being allowed into the federal courthouse. [06:40.120 --> 06:46.480] They only want to allow people that either a, don't have a phone or iPad or any kind [06:46.480 --> 06:48.880] of electronic smartwatch, nothing like that. [06:48.880 --> 06:53.560] That's one group of people that can come in and another group of people that can come [06:53.560 --> 07:02.400] in is law enforcement and, and bar card carriers, but for average Joe, they don't let them let [07:02.400 --> 07:03.400] us in. [07:03.400 --> 07:09.560] So I said, you're asking to give up one right. [07:09.560 --> 07:15.080] They let the criminals in and they let the criminals in and not the good guys. [07:15.080 --> 07:16.080] Right. [07:16.080 --> 07:24.600] So I said, you're, you're asking me to give up one right in order to exercise another right. [07:24.600 --> 07:25.960] And they didn't want to rule on that one. [07:25.960 --> 07:28.960] They just try to leave that one alone. [07:28.960 --> 07:33.920] And so I went above their heads and, you know, did judicial misconduct complaint and so forth [07:33.920 --> 07:37.920] and, and rid of habeas corpus. [07:37.920 --> 07:41.120] I'm just stirring up, you know, I want them to follow their rules. [07:41.120 --> 07:42.640] I want them to follow the laws. [07:42.640 --> 07:47.920] I want them to go by what it says in black and white. [07:47.920 --> 07:54.560] Well, anyway, they finally got a district judge involved for the first time. [07:54.560 --> 08:02.880] And all he did was adopt the recommendations of the magistrate judge. [08:02.880 --> 08:10.520] Now, the recommendations are something that are intended to occur after what the federal [08:10.520 --> 08:16.680] rule calls the required proceedings, including evidence, your hearings, they didn't have [08:16.680 --> 08:17.680] any of that. [08:17.680 --> 08:24.880] She just had a magistrate judge just had a, she just clicked on something and said, no, [08:24.880 --> 08:27.800] this is a, this is going to be denied. [08:27.800 --> 08:28.920] And there was no hearing. [08:28.920 --> 08:34.800] There was no evidence, there was no evidence, your hearing, there was no required proceedings. [08:34.800 --> 08:41.040] She just says how she wants to rule, and then at some point, the district judge finally [08:41.040 --> 08:42.040] stepped in. [08:42.040 --> 08:49.480] And I had already debunked the concept of her being lawfully authorized to be involved [08:49.480 --> 08:52.040] at all. [08:52.040 --> 09:01.880] Title 28 US code 636 has some, um, some characteristics of what it would look like for a magistrate [09:01.880 --> 09:05.080] judge to be authorized. [09:05.080 --> 09:10.080] If this happens, if that happens, so this magistrate judge said that her authorization [09:10.080 --> 09:13.720] was from subsection C, consent of the parties. [09:13.720 --> 09:16.280] Oh, so I just made a big stink about that. [09:16.280 --> 09:17.880] There was no consent of the parties. [09:17.880 --> 09:26.760] Well, I also addressed in their subsection B, which is when a district judge has a matter [09:26.760 --> 09:37.560] before the court and hands it off to, it says designates or assigns a, uh, a particular, [09:37.560 --> 09:47.200] a certain matter, a pretrial matter, can't be dispositive and designates that to a magistrate [09:47.200 --> 09:48.200] judge. [09:48.200 --> 09:54.080] Well, what they're doing is a completely different process day in, day out. [09:54.080 --> 10:00.320] What they do is as soon as you go and file a case, they automatically indiscriminately [10:00.320 --> 10:08.240] assign without the involvement of a district judge assigned the entire case and all matters [10:08.240 --> 10:13.200] not even before the court yet to a certain magistrate judge. [10:13.200 --> 10:18.560] And as the issues come up, that magistrate judge handles it and then at some point way [10:18.560 --> 10:22.040] down the line, the district judge signs off on it. [10:22.040 --> 10:25.440] Well, I'm sorry, but that's not how the law is written. [10:25.440 --> 10:28.560] So I'm giving them a hard time about that. [10:28.560 --> 10:35.600] Um, um, thinking as you're, you're talking, you know, this is a common problem. [10:35.600 --> 10:41.520] Uh, I've been through it, uh, just anyone who files a case in the federal court winds [10:41.520 --> 10:46.680] up with a magistrate judge and the magistrate judge is not really answerable. [10:46.680 --> 10:50.480] He's just, uh, that judge, he or she is just appointed. [10:50.480 --> 10:56.840] And this has been a problem and I'm thinking while you're, you're talking, how do we get [10:56.840 --> 10:59.360] a shot at him? [10:59.360 --> 11:05.200] If the magistrate judge who claimed to be acting based on the consent of the parties [11:05.200 --> 11:12.000] did not have the consent of the parties, what if you sue the magistrate judge personally? [11:12.000 --> 11:13.000] Hmm. [11:13.000 --> 11:14.000] Yeah. [11:14.000 --> 11:15.000] Right now. [11:15.000 --> 11:22.520] Right now, I think I could sue the district judge because the district judge lied. [11:22.520 --> 11:32.280] He's a lot harder to get to magistrate judge or like toadies, they got a bunch of them. [11:32.280 --> 11:38.960] They're just lawyers, lawyers authorized to practice in the federal court who can't make [11:38.960 --> 11:40.160] it as a lawyer. [11:40.160 --> 11:42.360] So they go down and get appointed as a magistrate. [11:42.360 --> 11:51.880] It's kind of like these, uh, court appointed counsel, uh, or these, uh, assistant district [11:51.880 --> 11:53.720] attorney in a municipal court. [11:53.720 --> 11:56.280] I mean, how do you get lower than that? [11:56.280 --> 12:05.960] We've become a magistrate judge in the federal court, how can you go? [12:05.960 --> 12:06.960] Yeah. [12:06.960 --> 12:12.920] They're just chumps and they do all the dirty stuff for the judges. [12:12.920 --> 12:14.720] So how do we thump them? [12:14.720 --> 12:18.640] Well, I'm working on that right now. [12:18.640 --> 12:24.040] I've lined up some facts and some laws and some conclusions that I think are going to [12:24.040 --> 12:26.720] feed nicely into a suit. [12:26.720 --> 12:30.480] And I'd like your idea about that being against the magistrate judge. [12:30.480 --> 12:36.640] I was starting to think that since the district judge has just involved himself, uh, he's [12:36.640 --> 12:41.440] stepping into trouble, but like you said, he's, he's more well protected. [12:41.440 --> 12:46.960] I think this magistrate judge can be held accountable for everything that she personally [12:46.960 --> 12:47.960] has done. [12:47.960 --> 12:57.720] And in any case, you can really black her political eye if she's the magistrate judge [12:57.720 --> 13:06.000] who winds up drawing a lawsuit onto the, the district, they're not going to be happy. [13:06.000 --> 13:07.000] Let's go back. [13:07.000 --> 13:14.040] I was in the military and finally the military and, uh, I follow somebody, you know, I get [13:14.040 --> 13:18.000] directly, we all get orders to do certain things, go out and cut the grass. [13:18.000 --> 13:21.160] I don't cut the grass right. [13:21.160 --> 13:25.000] And the general comes in and the grass is a mess. [13:25.000 --> 13:27.040] He's not going to talk to me. [13:27.040 --> 13:29.120] He don't care who I am. [13:29.120 --> 13:30.800] He's going to talk to the squadron commander. [13:30.800 --> 13:34.120] So I came in here squadron and the grass was a mess. [13:34.120 --> 13:36.360] What the heck is that? [13:36.360 --> 13:42.980] And the squadron commander is going to go to the officer in charge of my duty section. [13:42.980 --> 13:49.400] And he's going to say the man, the grass in your duty section was a mess and I got chewed [13:49.400 --> 13:51.520] out by the boss. [13:51.520 --> 13:52.520] You're in trouble. [13:52.520 --> 13:56.760] Well, I told him that I don't care what it doesn't make any difference. [13:56.760 --> 13:59.760] If you can't get it done, I'll get somebody in here who will. [13:59.760 --> 14:01.720] That's how it works. [14:01.720 --> 14:09.200] So this federal judge has got this magistrate judge and it's, it's the magistrate judge [14:09.200 --> 14:11.560] to handle these issues. [14:11.560 --> 14:14.560] Why am I having to deal with these issues? [14:14.560 --> 14:16.520] Well, I did this. [14:16.520 --> 14:17.520] I did. [14:17.520 --> 14:18.680] I don't care what you did. [14:18.680 --> 14:21.000] I hired you to make this go away. [14:21.000 --> 14:26.640] If it don't go away, it's your fault. [14:26.640 --> 14:34.120] I go into it from that perspective and nobody cares if you're right or wrong. [14:34.120 --> 14:35.680] You just make the accusation. [14:35.680 --> 14:37.000] Can you prove it up? [14:37.000 --> 14:38.000] Who cares? [14:38.000 --> 14:40.520] That's not going to make any difference. [14:40.520 --> 14:43.640] I actually can, but they're not going to listen anyway. [14:43.640 --> 14:44.640] So it doesn't matter. [14:44.640 --> 14:45.640] Yeah. [14:45.640 --> 14:46.640] So it doesn't matter. [14:46.640 --> 14:47.640] Just sting them. [14:47.640 --> 14:52.160] And then the guy who, whoever responds, you sting him. [14:52.160 --> 14:59.040] And then the word will get out, don't even let that guy get back into my court. [14:59.040 --> 15:03.640] If he comes back into my court, I better not have any problems from you, from him, or you [15:03.640 --> 15:05.760] better fix it. [15:05.760 --> 15:08.240] And they're going to say, how did this happen anyway? [15:08.240 --> 15:11.160] Is this a speeding ticket really? [15:11.160 --> 15:13.000] You kidding me? [15:13.000 --> 15:19.120] I keep thinking back to the Jazonowski case. [15:19.120 --> 15:22.000] Everybody should learn from the Jazonowski case. [15:22.000 --> 15:32.680] Jazonowski, they got a $99,000 mortgage, wasn't even a hundred grand. [15:32.680 --> 15:39.960] And they didn't, something they didn't like, and within the time limit, they filed a notice [15:39.960 --> 15:43.040] of rescission. [15:43.040 --> 15:48.920] And Wells Fargo said, well, if you want to rescind you, you have to give me the property [15:48.920 --> 15:52.360] back and then we'll give you your money back. [15:52.360 --> 15:58.200] And they said, no, no, no, no, no, you have to give me the money back first so I can secure [15:58.200 --> 16:00.960] another location. [16:00.960 --> 16:03.280] And they sued. [16:03.280 --> 16:07.920] They let this get to the U.S. Supreme. [16:07.920 --> 16:17.800] And the U.S. Supreme came in and cleaned Wells Fargo's clock, not just Wells Fargo. [16:17.800 --> 16:28.440] They said to every bank out there, if someone rescinds a mortgage, you have to immediately [16:28.440 --> 16:33.400] give them back every penny they paid you. [16:33.400 --> 16:39.200] Once you've given them back every penny, then they have to return the property to you, not [16:39.200 --> 16:40.200] the other way around. [16:40.200 --> 16:46.320] Because if it was the other way around, the individual would be left, would have to give [16:46.320 --> 16:50.760] you the property, and then they'd be left with no property at all, no place to live, [16:50.760 --> 16:54.840] while you decide whether or not you're going to release the funds they have coming to them. [16:54.840 --> 16:56.800] Hang on, we'll pick this up on the other side. [16:56.800 --> 17:00.600] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back. [17:00.600 --> 17:06.600] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [17:06.600 --> 17:11.360] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [17:11.360 --> 17:17.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [17:17.000 --> 17:22.440] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young [17:22.440 --> 17:25.600] Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [17:25.600 --> 17:30.600] Logo Swedeo Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which [17:30.600 --> 17:31.600] we reject. [17:31.600 --> 17:36.840] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [17:36.840 --> 17:40.040] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [17:40.040 --> 17:45.960] When you order from LogoSwedeoNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [17:45.960 --> 17:47.600] quality radio. [17:47.600 --> 17:51.920] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [17:51.920 --> 17:57.160] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [17:57.160 --> 17:59.120] increase your income. [17:59.120 --> 18:01.280] Order now. [18:01.280 --> 18:05.600] Are you looking to have a closer relationship with God and a better understanding of His [18:05.600 --> 18:11.400] Word? Then tune in to LogoSwedeoNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8-10pm Central Time for [18:11.400 --> 18:16.680] Scripture Talk, where Nana and her guests discuss the Scriptures in accord with 2 Timothy [18:16.680 --> 18:17.680] 2.15. [18:17.680 --> 18:22.760] Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed not to be ashamed, rightly [18:22.760 --> 18:25.160] dividing the word of truth. [18:25.160 --> 18:29.160] Starting in January, our first hour studies are in the book of Mark, where we'll go verse [18:29.160 --> 18:32.480] by verse and discuss the true gospel message. [18:32.480 --> 18:37.080] Our second hour topical studies will vary each week with discussions on sound doctrine [18:37.080 --> 18:39.480] and Christian character development. [18:39.480 --> 18:44.000] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [18:44.000 --> 18:48.320] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness [18:48.320 --> 18:50.600] of our Lord and Savior Jesus. [18:50.600 --> 18:57.720] So tune into Scripture Talk live on LogoSwedeoNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8-10pm to inspire and motivate [18:57.720 --> 19:04.720] your studies of the Scriptures. [19:27.720 --> 19:57.040] Okay, [19:57.040 --> 19:58.040] we are back. [19:58.040 --> 20:02.040] Randy Calderon, Brett Fountain, Rubella Radio on this... [20:02.040 --> 20:04.160] What day is it, Brett? [20:04.160 --> 20:08.280] We've got the 16th of March, 2023. [20:08.280 --> 20:09.280] There you go. [20:09.280 --> 20:13.000] Okay, and we were talking about the Jazz and Ascii case. [20:13.000 --> 20:23.720] The Jazz and Ascii case was 99,000 and these moronic lawyers took it all the way to the [20:23.720 --> 20:31.120] Supreme and because they didn't necessarily do just what makes sense. [20:31.120 --> 20:33.720] Sometimes they get their egos involved, right? [20:33.720 --> 20:40.720] No, a professional wouldn't do that. [20:40.720 --> 20:51.320] So the federal Supreme Court said to every bank in the country, if someone rescinds [20:51.320 --> 20:59.840] a mortgage, you must immediately give them back every time they gave you. [20:59.840 --> 21:08.160] Now what they went on to say that rescinding a mortgage was like removing to the federal [21:08.160 --> 21:10.360] court. [21:10.360 --> 21:16.000] When you remove to the federal court, you don't file a motion to remove. [21:16.000 --> 21:17.160] You remove. [21:17.160 --> 21:19.920] You have that power. [21:19.920 --> 21:25.480] So you file a notice of removal and the thing is removed. [21:25.480 --> 21:27.560] Nobody can challenge that. [21:27.560 --> 21:28.560] It's removed. [21:28.560 --> 21:35.520] Once it gets to the federal court, you can challenge the removal in the federal court. [21:35.520 --> 21:39.680] And the court said that this was the same way. [21:39.680 --> 21:44.480] When someone files a notice of rescission, it is rescinded. [21:44.480 --> 21:47.840] Even the filer can't undo it. [21:47.840 --> 21:50.360] It's a done deal. [21:50.360 --> 21:54.040] It really stuck it to the banks on rescission. [21:54.040 --> 21:59.400] So I took my qualified written request and I added a notice of rescission to the bottom [21:59.400 --> 22:02.920] of it just for Jezanowski. [22:02.920 --> 22:06.560] But the question was, who was the moron? [22:06.560 --> 22:11.480] Who let that get to the Supreme? [22:11.480 --> 22:19.720] And in Brett's case, it's a traffic ticket. [22:19.720 --> 22:20.720] Make this thing up. [22:20.720 --> 22:27.120] You know, I'm the district, federal district judge, guys, this is a traffic ticket. [22:27.120 --> 22:30.080] I got serious business. [22:30.080 --> 22:32.280] Why am I dealing with a traffic ticket? [22:32.280 --> 22:35.400] Yeah, they're going to make it go away. [22:35.400 --> 22:37.000] But sir, we already did. [22:37.000 --> 22:41.320] He's still coming after us. [22:41.320 --> 22:45.560] He's the district judge is going to say, I don't care. [22:45.560 --> 22:47.600] It's your problem. [22:47.600 --> 22:50.280] Fix it. [22:50.280 --> 22:56.960] So we need to learn how to be real penises in the anises. [22:56.960 --> 22:59.840] Is that improper to say on the air, Brett? [22:59.840 --> 23:06.440] How about, let's say, let's turn on the caller board and see if there's anybody that has [23:06.440 --> 23:09.240] some questions and comments. [23:09.240 --> 23:15.360] Call the call boards on, I call in number 512-646-1984. [23:15.360 --> 23:21.360] But I do like this idea of just beating up the federal courts. [23:21.360 --> 23:23.840] We're the only ones who can do it. [23:23.840 --> 23:28.160] The lawyers can't, they're terrified of these federal judges. [23:28.160 --> 23:33.480] The only ones who are not, and that's part of the reason they hate process because we're [23:33.480 --> 23:35.240] not terrified of them. [23:35.240 --> 23:43.160] Judge McBride, I found a petition to declare toward judgment and Locklord, one of the biggest [23:43.160 --> 23:48.840] law firms in the country, their lawyer filed a motion to dismiss for failure of state of [23:48.840 --> 23:53.480] claim which covered can be heard, can be had. [23:53.480 --> 23:57.720] And the judge dismissed it for failure of state of claim which covered can be had. [23:57.720 --> 24:03.280] But it was a petition for declared toward judgment. [24:03.280 --> 24:07.320] There are no claims. [24:07.320 --> 24:13.520] I immediately filed criminal charges with a special agent in charge of the local FBI [24:13.520 --> 24:16.520] against Judge McBride. [24:16.520 --> 24:19.000] Oh, that was a hoot. [24:19.000 --> 24:26.240] I had three other people file that same, my client in that base just walked away. [24:26.240 --> 24:27.400] So I couldn't pursue. [24:27.400 --> 24:33.000] I had three other people file that same case and Judge McBride did not dismiss a one of [24:33.000 --> 24:34.000] them. [24:34.000 --> 24:41.280] I don't know what the U.S. Attorney told him, but he got his attention. [24:41.280 --> 24:47.320] So anyway, only the process can do that to him. [24:47.320 --> 24:53.600] No lawyer in his right professional mind would have stood up to the federal judge, 99-year-old [24:53.600 --> 25:00.000] federal Judge McBride, he's a real cantankerous, I called him a stinker, that's the worst [25:00.000 --> 25:03.520] I could call a federal judge. [25:03.520 --> 25:05.400] But that changed his position. [25:05.400 --> 25:07.760] He didn't do that anymore. [25:07.760 --> 25:08.760] Only we can do it. [25:08.760 --> 25:15.000] You and I did the pro se litigants. [25:15.000 --> 25:16.000] You called him a stinker. [25:16.000 --> 25:17.000] I called him on the air. [25:17.000 --> 25:18.000] No on the air. [25:18.000 --> 25:27.960] I didn't do it on the on the criminal complaint, I called him a criminal and wanted him to [25:27.960 --> 25:28.960] arrest him. [25:28.960 --> 25:32.560] But because my client backed up, I didn't go ahead and pursue it all the way through [25:32.560 --> 25:37.640] the U.S. Attorney like I did in Florida with the IRS agent. [25:37.640 --> 25:41.040] We pursued that one. [25:41.040 --> 25:42.600] They did the standard stuff. [25:42.600 --> 25:51.520] I went to the court and said in a courtroom while they were having these cattle call hearings [25:51.520 --> 25:55.440] where they're bringing in guys who've been arrested, same thing they do in the lower [25:55.440 --> 26:02.800] courts and called the U.S. Marshal over the bailiff and told him my name and instructed [26:02.800 --> 26:05.480] the judge that I have business with the court. [26:05.480 --> 26:07.640] He said, may I tell the judge in nature the business? [26:07.640 --> 26:08.640] No, you may not. [26:08.640 --> 26:10.760] I have business with the court and it's none of yours. [26:10.760 --> 26:12.160] I went and sat down. [26:12.160 --> 26:16.520] Well, it was female and she didn't tell the judge and the judge was finishing the hearing [26:16.520 --> 26:23.160] and dismissing the hearing and I stood up and said, your honor, boy, this bailiff was [26:23.160 --> 26:29.800] furious, ran over to me and I said, your honor, can you call your bulldog off here? [26:29.800 --> 26:34.240] She called the bailiff back and she said, what can I do for you? [26:34.240 --> 26:37.160] I said, your honor, I have business with the court. [26:37.160 --> 26:42.760] Well, she said, then she said, everybody else, anyone who wants to go, you can if you want [26:42.760 --> 26:44.240] to stay, you can. [26:44.240 --> 26:51.320] But apparently we have someone who has business with the court and she said, well, Mr. Kelton, [26:51.320 --> 26:57.320] that is the nature of your business and I fabricated this whopper. [26:57.320 --> 27:08.600] I told her that I was a radio talk show host out of Austin and I did a show on legal reform [27:08.600 --> 27:15.040] and I get people calling in all the time complaining about the courts and I got more complaints [27:15.040 --> 27:22.440] about this court in Fort Lauderdale than any other court in the nation and they told me [27:22.440 --> 27:29.640] how horrible it was and how the judges never followed law and frankly, your honor, I didn't [27:29.640 --> 27:31.640] believe that. [27:31.640 --> 27:37.920] So I come down here to check it out myself and I've been watching the court and this [27:37.920 --> 27:39.880] seems just fine. [27:39.880 --> 27:46.280] What I would like you to do is allow me to bring in my camera crew and videotape the [27:46.280 --> 27:51.400] court because I got more complaints about this court than any other and I want to be [27:51.400 --> 27:58.160] able to show the public how you handle people in court so that you'll know they're not [27:58.160 --> 28:02.240] as corrupt as everybody says they are. [28:02.240 --> 28:10.520] I had about five U.S. Marshals and they're just itching to get me by the throat. [28:10.520 --> 28:14.760] And the judge said, well, no, Mr. Kelton, we don't allow any cameras in the courtroom. [28:14.760 --> 28:16.400] Oh, that's okay, Judge. [28:16.400 --> 28:17.400] We won't get in the way. [28:17.400 --> 28:18.720] We'll stand back there in the back. [28:18.720 --> 28:22.720] We won't bother anybody. [28:22.720 --> 28:23.720] And I'm gay. [28:23.720 --> 28:24.720] I'm so cooperate. [28:24.720 --> 28:41.480] We were down there after a IRS agent and we had a cameraman who was a little wild. [28:41.480 --> 28:45.600] I thought he's going to get us all beaten into unconsciousness and I wound up getting [28:45.600 --> 28:50.400] hold of the head U.S. Marshal and he was actually one of us. [28:50.400 --> 28:54.640] He said, when we talked to him about what we do and he said, you know, there's only one [28:54.640 --> 28:58.200] thing that I want to see. [28:58.200 --> 29:03.080] I want to see all of these judges act in accordance with the Constitution. [29:03.080 --> 29:04.080] Deborah was there. [29:04.080 --> 29:06.080] Deborah, are you there? [29:06.080 --> 29:07.080] She's kind of there in the background. [29:07.080 --> 29:14.840] She was there when we did that and Deborah said, well, you're one of us. [29:14.840 --> 29:15.840] He said, no, I'm not. [29:15.840 --> 29:17.040] Yeah, you're one of us. [29:17.040 --> 29:18.440] She said, yeah, you're one of us. [29:18.440 --> 29:19.440] This is all we want. [29:19.440 --> 29:21.440] This is why we're here. [29:21.440 --> 29:25.440] It was great to talk to him. [29:25.440 --> 29:34.000] But they wound up firing the IRS agent because the U.S. attorney called me and told me, I [29:34.000 --> 29:38.760] tried to get to the grand jury again, that he would charge me with jury tampering. [29:38.760 --> 29:40.520] I told him, knock yourself out. [29:40.520 --> 29:42.040] You charge me jury tampering. [29:42.040 --> 29:43.800] I'll charge you with obstruction. [29:43.800 --> 29:47.000] We'll see how this works out for you. [29:47.000 --> 29:48.000] Click. [29:48.000 --> 29:51.240] The next day they fired the IRS agent. [29:51.240 --> 29:53.240] We can take them on and it's great fun. [29:53.240 --> 29:55.360] We do have our phone lines open. [29:55.360 --> 29:57.480] We don't have any calls. [29:57.480 --> 29:58.480] Is everybody asleep? [29:58.480 --> 30:01.760] We'll be right back. [30:01.760 --> 30:05.880] Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information and you may trust them to keep it safe. [30:05.880 --> 30:10.480] But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your [30:10.480 --> 30:11.480] secrets. [30:11.480 --> 30:15.840] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details. [30:15.840 --> 30:17.440] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.440 --> 30:21.040] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:21.040 --> 30:25.840] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:25.840 --> 30:27.280] So protect your rights. [30:27.280 --> 30:31.000] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [30:31.000 --> 30:33.600] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.600 --> 30:37.920] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [30:37.920 --> 30:41.400] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:41.400 --> 30:45.080] Start over with StartPage. [30:45.080 --> 30:49.880] Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle [30:49.880 --> 30:51.280] your personal information. [30:51.280 --> 30:54.320] But what happens if it escapes their control? [30:54.320 --> 30:56.000] It's not an idle question. [30:56.000 --> 31:01.120] According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was [31:01.120 --> 31:03.520] breached by hackers in the last year. [31:03.520 --> 31:07.400] That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com. [31:07.400 --> 31:12.000] Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you. [31:12.000 --> 31:15.440] They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals [31:15.440 --> 31:16.440] to see. [31:16.440 --> 31:17.920] The cupboard would be bare. [31:17.920 --> 31:21.000] Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way. [31:21.000 --> 31:23.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [31:23.000 --> 31:30.840] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.840 --> 31:31.840] I lost my son. [31:31.840 --> 31:32.840] My nephew. [31:32.840 --> 31:33.840] My uncle. [31:33.840 --> 31:34.840] My son. [31:34.840 --> 31:35.840] On September 11, 2001. [31:35.840 --> 31:39.080] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11. [31:39.080 --> 31:43.320] Full Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane. [31:43.320 --> 31:47.080] Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7. [31:47.080 --> 31:51.920] Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more [31:51.920 --> 31:52.920] to the story. [31:52.920 --> 31:54.320] Bring justice to my son. [31:54.320 --> 31:55.320] My uncle. [31:55.320 --> 31:56.320] My nephew. [31:56.320 --> 31:57.320] My son. [31:57.320 --> 31:58.320] Go to building what.org. [31:58.320 --> 31:59.320] Why it fell. [31:59.320 --> 32:00.320] Why it matters. [32:00.320 --> 32:01.320] And what you can do. [32:01.320 --> 32:05.320] Rula Law Radio is proud to offer the Rula Law Traffic Seminar. [32:05.320 --> 32:09.240] In today's America, we live in a us against them society, and if we, the people, are ever [32:09.240 --> 32:13.200] going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.200 --> 32:16.240] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [32:16.240 --> 32:20.280] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:20.280 --> 32:24.120] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [32:24.120 --> 32:26.000] our rights through due process. [32:26.000 --> 32:29.480] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rula Law Radio, has put together the [32:29.480 --> 32:33.240] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [32:33.240 --> 32:35.600] is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:35.600 --> 32:39.600] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RulaLawRadio.com and [32:39.600 --> 32:40.920] ordering your copy today. [32:40.920 --> 32:44.320] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [32:44.320 --> 32:47.920] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. [32:47.920 --> 32:51.000] Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. [32:51.000 --> 32:55.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RulaLawRadio.com. [32:55.000 --> 33:02.000] After your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve. [33:25.000 --> 33:53.600] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelham, Brett Count and RulaLawRadio, and there is some indication [33:53.600 --> 33:59.680] that we may have an archive running, we're trying to get that taken care of. [33:59.680 --> 34:10.440] So in the meantime, I will keep going, talk about what I am trying to make a date, always [34:10.440 --> 34:12.440] forget the date. [34:12.440 --> 34:25.960] This is the 16th day of March, 2023, and we started out talking about the federal courts [34:25.960 --> 34:34.160] and how the only ones who can beat them up are you and I, the lawyers can't do it, lawyers [34:34.160 --> 34:39.960] are terrified of the courts, the only ones who don't have to be afraid of them are you [34:39.960 --> 34:49.240] and I, and Brett is taking on the federal courts from the perspective of a traffic ticket. [34:49.240 --> 34:57.280] If I was a traffic ticket, a case in the federal, he brings it to the federal court [34:57.280 --> 35:05.720] and they are doing their standard dance round, dance round, and what they are not getting [35:05.720 --> 35:13.200] is not a lawyer whose bar card they can steal, they can't screw him over, they can't screw [35:13.200 --> 35:18.680] his client over, so he's not afraid of them, he doesn't need to be afraid of them. [35:18.680 --> 35:24.560] And what has been my experience with them is when they get someone like that, they have [35:24.560 --> 35:28.120] no idea how to deal with them. [35:28.120 --> 35:33.120] They are so accustomed to doing the same things over and over, you file a case in the federal [35:33.120 --> 35:38.120] court and the first thing they do is sign a magistrate, you object to the magistrate, [35:38.120 --> 35:40.800] they ignore the objection. [35:40.800 --> 35:48.800] You file a petition for real demand damage, they ask the court to order them to put this [35:48.800 --> 35:54.760] before the district judge, they ignore it, they pay absolutely no attention to the rule [35:54.760 --> 35:55.760] of law. [35:55.760 --> 35:58.760] Yep, check both of those boxes, that's what happened. [35:58.760 --> 36:07.520] They don't care, they just don't care, so we have to find a way to get to it. [36:07.520 --> 36:17.560] If the federal, if magistrate has not met the requirements for sitting as a magistrate, [36:17.560 --> 36:24.360] couldn't you charge the magistrate with impersonating a public official and sue the magistrate [36:24.360 --> 36:25.360] personally? [36:25.360 --> 36:33.280] The magistrate is going to claim that the magistrate has immunity. [36:33.280 --> 36:39.160] And you're going to say, well, if you were, had a subcommittee jurisdiction or standing [36:39.160 --> 36:47.200] to sit in the case, maybe you would have, but you don't have standing. [36:47.200 --> 36:56.680] I think we need to put together a set of standard documents for this. [36:56.680 --> 37:00.840] Always this will be the same. [37:00.840 --> 37:09.560] You file a suit in the federal court, the federal court automatically appoints a magistrate, [37:09.560 --> 37:16.120] you object to the magistrate, they ignore your objection and act like you didn't object [37:16.120 --> 37:17.680] and just keep going. [37:17.680 --> 37:25.000] Well, I agree there should be some standard documents, however, I don't see success yet, [37:25.000 --> 37:28.640] so I hesitate to put it out there and say, here, everybody do this. [37:28.640 --> 37:34.600] No, it's not about success, it's about harassment. [37:34.600 --> 37:37.120] Okay, well, that makes sense. [37:37.120 --> 37:38.720] Well, that's worth something too. [37:38.720 --> 37:42.360] Yeah, they're going to rule against us out of hand. [37:42.360 --> 37:47.240] And then you go after the ones who ruled against us. [37:47.240 --> 37:51.520] They use that kind of garbage on us. [37:51.520 --> 37:55.600] What's to keep us from doing it to them, what's to keep us from filing criminal charges against [37:55.600 --> 38:04.960] the magistrate for impersonating a federal judge and judicial misconduct complaint. [38:04.960 --> 38:12.000] And then when the US attorney refuses to give it to the grand jury, then you file against [38:12.000 --> 38:19.240] the US attorney with the attorney general in DC. [38:19.240 --> 38:20.320] This is all pretty straightforward. [38:20.320 --> 38:24.000] The exact same thing happens every single time. [38:24.000 --> 38:25.000] Yep. [38:25.000 --> 38:29.880] All you got to do is fill in the names and the dates and the rest of it's the same. [38:29.880 --> 38:30.880] Maybe case number. [38:30.880 --> 38:37.960] And the judicial, the judicial conduct complaint against the district judge for allowing that [38:37.960 --> 38:46.560] magistrate to impersonate him in his court and then accuse him of acting in concert [38:46.560 --> 38:48.680] and collusion. [38:48.680 --> 38:53.960] We can build a whole set of documents that are, there's only one set of facts. [38:53.960 --> 39:04.440] You file suit, magistrate judge, in the lawsuit, when you filed it, there was a place to agree [39:04.440 --> 39:05.920] to a magistrate judge. [39:05.920 --> 39:11.760] And if you didn't file that, if you didn't check that, they will send you a notice asking [39:11.760 --> 39:20.680] you to agree to a magistrate judge and you file an objection to it. [39:20.680 --> 39:22.480] Always exactly the same. [39:22.480 --> 39:27.840] So we can build a set of documents that people just start dumping on them every time they [39:27.840 --> 39:29.840] file suit. [39:29.840 --> 39:35.160] Judicial conduct complaints, arguments against the US attorney. [39:35.160 --> 39:43.480] Because attorneys become US attorneys so that after they get out of that office, then go [39:43.480 --> 39:46.000] out and make big money. [39:46.000 --> 39:55.280] How big money are they going to make if they got tier 15 or grievances against them? [39:55.280 --> 40:01.640] No law firms going to hire these guys. [40:01.640 --> 40:04.760] Maybe it's time we kind of campaigned on that. [40:04.760 --> 40:08.280] I'm getting ready to file a suit that will go to the feds. [40:08.280 --> 40:11.560] I've got a couple of them that are going to go to the feds. [40:11.560 --> 40:20.800] I'll start putting together these documents and we can start beating them up. [40:20.800 --> 40:30.320] So in your case, what steps have they violated specifically relative to this? [40:30.320 --> 40:35.600] But how did you bring this objection to them? [40:35.600 --> 40:43.600] Well there have been a lot of objections but in this, so we've got everything that I'm [40:43.600 --> 40:53.440] complaining about right now is facts that are shown in the official court clerk's records. [40:53.440 --> 40:56.040] So that I don't have to swear to anything. [40:56.040 --> 41:01.200] At least don't have to be notarized affidavits or anything, verified, sworn, nothing. [41:01.200 --> 41:07.480] All I have to do is say, hey, rules of evidence 201 says if this is an indisputable fact such [41:07.480 --> 41:12.440] as take a look at the court record, then it's mandatory judicial notice. [41:12.440 --> 41:15.680] So that's my way of complaining about it. [41:15.680 --> 41:21.960] And the things that I'm complaining about are that the record shows that the magistrate [41:21.960 --> 41:27.640] judges assertion that she has authority to involve herself was based on consent of the [41:27.640 --> 41:29.320] parties. [41:29.320 --> 41:33.880] And the official record shows there was no consent of any party. [41:33.880 --> 41:41.360] The official record shows there was no opportunity provided for any party to give consent. [41:41.360 --> 41:47.280] And so then my conclusion is, I mean that's pretty simple straightforward, right? [41:47.280 --> 41:56.440] My conclusion is that she failed to speak with candor before this honorable court. [41:56.440 --> 41:59.440] We'll get to the part about her not having authority, but I wanted to go ahead and catch [41:59.440 --> 42:01.600] that one while we're on it. [42:01.600 --> 42:06.480] Then I went ahead to some other facts and said, so then the district judge jumps in [42:06.480 --> 42:08.480] and he makes a different assertion. [42:08.480 --> 42:16.760] He asserts that that magistrates judges authority to involve herself was under a different site. [42:16.760 --> 42:21.360] Subsection B of that same 636. [42:21.360 --> 42:23.120] And wow, that's vague and broad. [42:23.120 --> 42:27.760] I accused him of being vague and broad, comprising a number of situations. [42:27.760 --> 42:33.960] The public register for legislation comprising title 28 US code 636 shows that subsection [42:33.960 --> 42:41.640] B and subsection D are quite different in terms of the prerequisite situational contexts. [42:41.640 --> 42:51.200] So the same situation that would cause somebody to be authorized in one case doesn't fit. [42:51.200 --> 42:56.240] You can't just say, oh, well, it was kind of the same. [42:56.240 --> 42:57.240] No. [42:57.240 --> 43:03.280] The judge failed to rule on the facts and law before the court, but made up his own facts [43:03.280 --> 43:04.280] and law. [43:04.280 --> 43:05.280] Yeah. [43:05.280 --> 43:06.280] And that. [43:06.280 --> 43:07.280] Yeah. [43:07.280 --> 43:08.280] Oh, wait till you see that. [43:08.280 --> 43:16.040] Yeah, another thing he did was one issue that I had brought up was that this judge has no [43:16.040 --> 43:20.720] this magistrate judge has no lawful authority to be involved at all. [43:20.720 --> 43:25.800] She's everything she does is ultra various as without authority. [43:25.800 --> 43:33.160] And this district judge jumped in and he found some case law that says litigants don't get [43:33.160 --> 43:36.320] a chance to pick and choose which judge they want. [43:36.320 --> 43:39.960] So he's harping on that as if that were my issue. [43:39.960 --> 43:46.400] I didn't say I want to pick and choose which judge I get, I said, she's asserting to have [43:46.400 --> 43:50.920] authority based on consent of the parties and she doesn't have it. [43:50.920 --> 43:56.520] All right, anyway, we're just about to go to sponsors. [43:56.520 --> 43:59.960] We'll finish this up on the other side. [43:59.960 --> 44:00.960] I love logos. [44:00.960 --> 44:04.280] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [44:04.280 --> 44:07.120] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [44:07.120 --> 44:08.320] I need my truth fix. [44:08.320 --> 44:12.960] I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. [44:12.960 --> 44:16.760] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't [44:16.760 --> 44:20.160] have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [44:20.160 --> 44:21.840] How can I help logos? [44:21.840 --> 44:23.640] Well, I'm glad you asked. [44:23.640 --> 44:26.640] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. [44:26.640 --> 44:29.240] You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts. [44:29.240 --> 44:31.240] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [44:31.240 --> 44:37.600] Now go to LogosRegulnetwork.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [44:37.600 --> 44:43.240] Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. [44:43.240 --> 44:44.240] Do I pay extra? [44:44.240 --> 44:45.240] No. [44:45.240 --> 44:47.240] Do I have to do anything different when I order? [44:47.240 --> 44:48.240] No. [44:48.240 --> 44:49.240] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [44:49.240 --> 44:50.240] No. [44:50.240 --> 44:51.240] I mean, yes. [44:51.240 --> 44:55.720] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. [44:55.720 --> 44:56.720] Thank you so much. [44:56.720 --> 44:58.200] We are welcome. [44:58.200 --> 45:01.120] Happy holidays, logos. [45:01.120 --> 45:04.320] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:04.320 --> 45:11.120] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course [45:11.120 --> 45:14.120] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:14.120 --> 45:18.840] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:18.840 --> 45:23.080] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.080 --> 45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:28.000 --> 45:34.680] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.680 --> 45:39.200] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [45:39.200 --> 45:43.520] the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.520 --> 45:49.720] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.720 --> 45:52.320] prosa tactics, and much more. [45:52.320 --> 46:00.320] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [46:53.320 --> 46:59.320] Watch in the spot spot. [47:02.320 --> 47:07.320] The first time there's an addiction, the hard work can leave you cold as nails. [47:07.320 --> 47:13.320] A bit of hostility, touch and quity, heavy loads of taping on scales. [47:13.320 --> 47:19.320] The time is colliding with the conflict, you find out after a while. [47:19.320 --> 47:24.320] It's not your moral standard, it's your patience that's on trial. [47:24.320 --> 47:30.320] Watch in the spot spot. [47:30.320 --> 47:35.320] Watch in the spot spot. [47:35.320 --> 47:41.320] Watch in the spot spot. [47:41.320 --> 47:44.320] Watch in the spot spot. [47:44.320 --> 47:50.320] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, and I'm having the same [47:50.320 --> 47:52.320] problem every segment. [47:52.320 --> 47:58.320] Brett tells me to announce the date, but he never tells me what year it is. [47:58.320 --> 48:02.320] That was just 15 minutes ago. [48:02.320 --> 48:04.320] Oh, that. [48:04.320 --> 48:12.320] Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, on this, the 16th day of March, 2023. [48:12.320 --> 48:25.320] And we were talking about how to jerk around the federal courts, especially federal magistrates. [48:25.320 --> 48:27.320] I think we need to put together a program. [48:27.320 --> 48:30.320] Oh, by the way, we do have the phone lines on. [48:30.320 --> 48:33.320] I thought I had them on earlier, but I think I turned them on. [48:33.320 --> 48:35.320] These things are, they cycle. [48:35.320 --> 48:41.320] So I hit the on button and execute and I think Brett was hitting it at the same time. [48:41.320 --> 48:44.320] So we wound up turning them on and then right back off again. [48:44.320 --> 48:46.320] So they're on right now. [48:46.320 --> 48:48.320] At least my system says they are. [48:48.320 --> 48:51.320] And I hit refresh like I was instructed to do. [48:51.320 --> 48:53.320] And it shows that the phones are on. [48:53.320 --> 48:59.320] So if you have a question or a comment, give us a call 940. [48:59.320 --> 49:02.320] No, don't call 940. [49:02.320 --> 49:04.320] Brett, are you giving your wife? [49:04.320 --> 49:07.320] I've only said this for 15 years. [49:07.320 --> 49:13.320] Five, one, two, six, four, six, 1984. [49:13.320 --> 49:18.320] I need, well, I was, I was having some throat problems before the show started. [49:18.320 --> 49:22.320] And I found the perfect medicine. [49:22.320 --> 49:30.320] It's an alcohol, an alcohol tincture of barley and hops. [49:30.320 --> 49:31.320] How about that? [49:31.320 --> 49:33.320] Anyway, yeah. [49:33.320 --> 49:35.320] Anyway, that worked pretty good. [49:35.320 --> 49:38.320] I don't know if I'm coughing or I do any of that kind of stuff. [49:38.320 --> 49:42.320] But I'm, it took a little more than I expected. [49:42.320 --> 49:44.320] So I probably don't know what I'm doing. [49:44.320 --> 49:47.320] Anyway, we're talking about going after the fence. [49:47.320 --> 49:56.320] And we were talking about the issue of a magistrate judge's involvement, period, just being involved. [49:56.320 --> 50:01.320] Because the law says that they need to have a certain pre-trial matter. [50:01.320 --> 50:06.320] That is designated to them or assigned to them by the district judge. [50:06.320 --> 50:10.320] It has to be some matter that is currently before the court. [50:10.320 --> 50:14.320] That's what they're allowed to put over to a magistrate judge. [50:14.320 --> 50:16.320] He can say, hey, I need some help with this. [50:16.320 --> 50:17.320] Can you help me with my load? [50:17.320 --> 50:20.320] There's this issue right here. [50:20.320 --> 50:21.320] Wait a minute. [50:21.320 --> 50:25.320] He cannot assign an entire case. [50:25.320 --> 50:30.320] Is that an administrative act? [50:30.320 --> 50:32.320] I don't know if it is or not. [50:32.320 --> 50:36.320] It's not saying that it's his duty that he has to assign it. [50:36.320 --> 50:41.320] But the involvement has to be authorized by that. [50:41.320 --> 50:44.320] It's not a judicial determination. [50:44.320 --> 50:49.320] I mean, it's kind of like buying toilet paper. [50:49.320 --> 50:53.320] Well, but it's not something he's required to do. [50:53.320 --> 50:55.320] You sign a judge. [50:55.320 --> 50:56.320] No, he doesn't have to. [50:56.320 --> 51:02.320] In the state, we have somebody who assigns judges, [51:02.320 --> 51:05.320] but he's an administrative judge. [51:05.320 --> 51:06.320] This is an administrative action. [51:06.320 --> 51:07.320] District judge? [51:07.320 --> 51:08.320] No, the district judge. [51:08.320 --> 51:10.320] Yes, it might be administrative in nature, [51:10.320 --> 51:14.320] but it's not something that you could say this is his ministerial duty. [51:14.320 --> 51:20.320] Because he could, without taking this extra step of assigning some matter [51:20.320 --> 51:23.320] to some magistrate judge, he could just handle it himself. [51:23.320 --> 51:24.320] He's the district judge. [51:24.320 --> 51:25.320] It's his job. [51:25.320 --> 51:26.320] Yeah. [51:26.320 --> 51:35.320] But the assigning of a magistrate judge is not a judicial act. [51:35.320 --> 51:38.320] It's like he could buy toilet paper if he wants to or not. [51:38.320 --> 51:40.320] That's not judicial. [51:40.320 --> 51:43.320] That doesn't have anything to do with the adjudication of cases. [51:43.320 --> 51:45.320] Assigning a judge. [51:45.320 --> 51:47.320] You're going to know immunities. [51:47.320 --> 51:54.320] I'm saying that's an administrative act for which he should have no immunity. [51:54.320 --> 51:56.320] Gotcha. [51:56.320 --> 52:01.320] So there's another issue here that I'm addressing. [52:01.320 --> 52:10.320] Not only the issue of the magistrate judge being involved at all. [52:10.320 --> 52:14.320] And that's a very common issue, as you mentioned, [52:14.320 --> 52:19.320] and a secondary issue here, which is that the magistrate judge lied. [52:19.320 --> 52:22.320] That's probably not as common of an issue. [52:22.320 --> 52:27.320] But another issue that I'm addressing, I imagine, is very common. [52:27.320 --> 52:33.320] The law says that a magistrate judge must promptly conduct the required proceedings [52:33.320 --> 52:42.320] when assigned without the party's consent to hear a pretrial matter dispositive of a claim. [52:42.320 --> 52:43.320] Okay. [52:43.320 --> 52:50.320] Is that something for which the judge has discretion? [52:50.320 --> 52:51.320] No. [52:51.320 --> 52:57.320] Must promptly conduct the required proceedings when assigned. [52:57.320 --> 53:02.320] So this is something that the magistrate judge had absolutely no wiggle room. [53:02.320 --> 53:04.320] Must conduct those proceedings. [53:04.320 --> 53:09.320] And it goes on to talk about including evidentiary proceedings. [53:09.320 --> 53:14.320] So if the judge wants to rule, sorry. [53:14.320 --> 53:23.320] You could sue both the federal judge and the magistrate for conspiring together to do that. [53:23.320 --> 53:26.320] Well, they obviously did. [53:26.320 --> 53:32.320] The district judge improperly appointed the magistrate judge. [53:32.320 --> 53:33.320] No. [53:33.320 --> 53:34.320] So that the magistrate judge... [53:34.320 --> 53:35.320] The district judge got nothing. [53:35.320 --> 53:37.320] Only adopted after it was all done. [53:37.320 --> 53:43.320] He just signed off on it and said it's all good. [53:43.320 --> 53:47.320] So she acted without an order from the judge. [53:47.320 --> 53:50.320] Zero, zero input from the district judge. [53:50.320 --> 53:57.320] And then the judge acted in concert and collusion with the corporal act after the fact. [53:57.320 --> 54:02.320] He should have taken action to mitigate the harm she caused. [54:02.320 --> 54:12.320] But instead, he condoned it and facilitated the ongoing for this to happen again. [54:12.320 --> 54:15.320] That sounds like recap. [54:15.320 --> 54:18.320] Has he done this more than once? [54:18.320 --> 54:20.320] Records requests. [54:20.320 --> 54:29.320] So the facts are that the official court record shows that the magistrate judge e-filed a [54:29.320 --> 54:34.320] dispositive document report and recommendations. [54:34.320 --> 54:40.320] Now, there's no such thing as report and recommendations documents except for in their imagination. [54:40.320 --> 54:41.320] It's kind of like these magistrations. [54:41.320 --> 54:45.320] There's no such thing as report and recommendations. [54:45.320 --> 54:51.320] There's such a thing as findings of fact and recommendations which a magistrate judge would [54:51.320 --> 54:56.320] be able to prepare for the district judge to review. [54:56.320 --> 54:58.320] But she didn't. [54:58.320 --> 55:03.320] Findings of fact and recommendations would have to be based on those required proceedings [55:03.320 --> 55:06.320] that she skipped. [55:06.320 --> 55:13.320] How do you find facts without and have evidentiary hearings without actually doing anything? [55:13.320 --> 55:17.320] You just imagine it all and no. [55:17.320 --> 55:23.320] So the court record shows that she filed this document that's bogus. [55:23.320 --> 55:32.320] The court record shows that she was never assigned to hear any pretrial matter and that she was, [55:32.320 --> 55:35.320] she never conducted any of the required proceedings. [55:35.320 --> 55:42.320] Well, I don't know about you, but common sense would say that the findings of fact and recommendations [55:42.320 --> 55:46.320] are intended to follow the required proceedings. [55:46.320 --> 55:49.320] That sounds like due process. [55:49.320 --> 55:50.320] Exactly. [55:50.320 --> 55:53.320] That's what I'm going after right now. [55:53.320 --> 55:59.320] So her document circumvented lawful authorization for her involvement and it circumvented the [55:59.320 --> 56:03.320] requirement for whoever would be lawfully authorized. [56:03.320 --> 56:07.320] The requirement to promptly conduct those required proceedings. [56:07.320 --> 56:11.320] Her document just jumped in front of all that. [56:11.320 --> 56:15.320] They're just going to go skip to the end and call it done. [56:15.320 --> 56:20.320] You know, every time I go through this, one thing keeps coming back to me. [56:20.320 --> 56:23.320] These guys are all criminals and they're all working together. [56:23.320 --> 56:27.320] How do we get to someone who doesn't have a dog in the hut? [56:27.320 --> 56:29.320] That's tough. [56:29.320 --> 56:39.320] And that's this procedure I developed for going to the special agent in charge filing criminal charges with him. [56:39.320 --> 56:48.320] So we take the judge and the magistrate and we charge them with acting in concert inclusion [56:48.320 --> 57:03.320] and furtherance of an ongoing criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice so that the judge may avoid [57:03.320 --> 57:10.320] performing under the contract of employment that he has with the feds. [57:10.320 --> 57:18.320] And he is only allowed to sit as a judge on good behavior and conspiring with a magistrate [57:18.320 --> 57:23.320] to deny you in due process is not good behavior. [57:23.320 --> 57:38.320] And that we can claim is a violation of their oath which goes to court warrantal removal. [57:38.320 --> 57:46.320] And, okay, we go to the special agent in charge file criminal charges with him against the federal judge. [57:46.320 --> 57:52.320] Well, if you're a special agent in charge of the FBI, you finally made it up through the range from the bottom [57:52.320 --> 57:58.320] and you're a big shot now and you get somebody who wants you to arrest the judge. [57:58.320 --> 58:01.320] Oh, heck, I'm not going to do that. [58:01.320 --> 58:06.320] And then when he doesn't, you file against him with the U.S. Attorney. [58:06.320 --> 58:13.320] And U.S. Attorney, he's not going to arrest the special agent in charge for not arresting the judge. [58:13.320 --> 58:19.320] Then you file against the U.S. Attorney with the grand jury for shielding your criminal complaints [58:19.320 --> 58:24.320] against the special agent in charge from the grand jury. [58:24.320 --> 58:27.320] Just look so clean. [58:27.320 --> 58:32.320] And these are guys who, they didn't have a dog here now. [58:32.320 --> 58:36.320] They didn't do any of that crap over that you're originally complaining about. [58:36.320 --> 58:39.320] Now we're getting in trouble. [58:39.320 --> 58:40.320] Hang on. [58:40.320 --> 58:45.320] Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Ruevlar Radio with C.A. and on the book of the board. [58:45.320 --> 58:47.320] We'll pick you up on the other side. [58:47.320 --> 59:13.320] We'll be right back. [59:17.320 --> 59:24.320] We'll be right back. [59:47.320 --> 01:00:01.320] That's freestudybible.com. [01:00:01.320 --> 01:00:05.320] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:00:05.320 --> 01:00:09.320] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:00:09.320 --> 01:00:11.320] Our liberty depends on it. [01:00:11.320 --> 01:00:16.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:00:16.320 --> 01:00:18.320] Privacy is under attack. [01:00:18.320 --> 01:00:22.320] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:00:22.320 --> 01:00:27.320] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:00:27.320 --> 01:00:28.320] So protect your rights. [01:00:28.320 --> 01:00:32.320] Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:00:32.320 --> 01:00:33.320] Privacy. [01:00:33.320 --> 01:00:35.320] It's worth hanging on to. [01:00:35.320 --> 01:00:38.320] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com. [01:00:38.320 --> 01:00:42.320] The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. [01:00:42.320 --> 01:00:45.320] Start over with StartPage. [01:00:45.320 --> 01:00:49.320] Most people think of seven as a more civilized number than six. [01:00:49.320 --> 01:00:54.320] Think of how the number six is implicated in evil as in the biblical 666. [01:00:54.320 --> 01:00:58.320] So it would fit right in that the seventh amendment would be about civil trials. [01:00:58.320 --> 01:01:00.320] Civil seven? Civil trials? Get it? [01:01:00.320 --> 01:01:05.320] Civil trials are ones where people sue instead of beating each other up over a dispute, [01:01:05.320 --> 01:01:07.320] like the dividing line between properties. [01:01:07.320 --> 01:01:11.320] They take their dispute to a courthouse and settle matters civilly without the fisticuffs. [01:01:11.320 --> 01:01:16.320] The seventh amendment guarantees that Americans have the right to a jury in certain civil matters [01:01:16.320 --> 01:01:19.320] instead of having a lone judge rule on the case. [01:01:19.320 --> 01:01:24.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:01:31.320 --> 01:01:35.320] The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments of our Constitution. [01:01:35.320 --> 01:01:39.320] They guarantee the specific freedoms Americans should know and protect. [01:01:39.320 --> 01:01:40.320] Our liberty depends on it. [01:01:40.320 --> 01:01:46.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with an unforgettable way to remember one of your constitutional rights. [01:02:10.320 --> 01:02:22.320] Remember the scene in George Orwell's novel 1984 when Winston is threatened with his worst fear? [01:02:22.320 --> 01:02:26.320] That fear was having a cage of hungry rats unleashed on his face. [01:02:26.320 --> 01:02:28.320] But what if his worst fear was spiders? [01:02:28.320 --> 01:02:30.320] Eight-legged spiders, to be exact. [01:02:30.320 --> 01:02:33.320] Getting a face full of spiders would be pretty cruel and unusual. [01:02:33.320 --> 01:02:37.320] That image of eight-legged spiders will help you remember the Eighth Amendment. [01:02:37.320 --> 01:02:44.320] Our founding fathers added the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to protect us from creepy, crawly, eight-legged punishments [01:02:44.320 --> 01:02:48.320] and other cruel and unusual prison practices that were common in their day. [01:02:48.320 --> 01:02:54.320] The Eighth Amendment also prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail and charging excessive fines. [01:02:54.320 --> 01:03:21.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:03:24.320 --> 01:03:31.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:03:55.320 --> 01:04:04.320] Okay, we are back with confidence because Brett actually told me what year it was. [01:04:04.320 --> 01:04:06.320] But I forgot. [01:04:06.320 --> 01:04:08.320] Okay, this is Thursday. [01:04:08.320 --> 01:04:12.320] What day? You didn't tell me what day, Brett. [01:04:12.320 --> 01:04:15.320] But I told you the year. [01:04:15.320 --> 01:04:24.320] Well, okay, 16th day of March, 2023. And I know that because I pulled up my calendar. [01:04:24.320 --> 01:04:30.320] Okay, we were talking about how to go after the federal courts. [01:04:30.320 --> 01:04:32.320] And it may be a good idea. [01:04:32.320 --> 01:04:38.320] Everybody who filed a suit, Harmon Taylor, took this issue on and fought it and lost it. [01:04:38.320 --> 01:04:41.320] The courts just don't care. [01:04:41.320 --> 01:04:46.320] They really don't care what the law is. So how do we make them care? [01:04:46.320 --> 01:04:51.320] We beat up somebody else because of them. [01:04:51.320 --> 01:04:56.320] And then get them griping to the federal judges for causing other people problems. [01:04:56.320 --> 01:05:06.320] And what is a U.S. attorney going to do when we start filing criminal charges against a U.S. attorney, [01:05:06.320 --> 01:05:14.320] accusing him of shielding the special agent in charge of the FBI from prosecution. [01:05:14.320 --> 01:05:23.320] I'm sorry, shielding himself from prosecution by secreting criminal complaints against himself from the grand jury. [01:05:23.320 --> 01:05:24.320] Oh, that'll... [01:05:24.320 --> 01:05:26.320] Were we accused him? [01:05:26.320 --> 01:05:27.320] Oh, yeah. [01:05:27.320 --> 01:05:36.320] Were we accused him of secreting criminal complaints against the special agent in charge? [01:05:36.320 --> 01:05:40.320] And it says nothing to the federal courts over there. [01:05:40.320 --> 01:05:43.320] But they started all this mess. [01:05:43.320 --> 01:05:50.320] And you accuse the U.S. of the special agent in charge of shielding the federal judge from prosecution. [01:05:50.320 --> 01:05:54.320] If you're on a jury and you hear all this, [01:05:54.320 --> 01:06:01.320] are you going to say, oh, it's okay for all these guys to do all this stuff? [01:06:01.320 --> 01:06:02.320] Maybe. [01:06:02.320 --> 01:06:06.320] But if you're a federal judge, [01:06:06.320 --> 01:06:11.320] and what you know about grand juries, you know what Scalia said about it, [01:06:11.320 --> 01:06:18.320] that any prosecutor worth his salt can get a ham sandwich and diet it. [01:06:18.320 --> 01:06:23.320] So I do something annoying over here to approach a litigant. [01:06:23.320 --> 01:06:33.320] And now he's over there beating up the U.S. attorney for not giving complaints against me to the grand jury. [01:06:33.320 --> 01:06:37.320] What if they really get him P.O.'s? [01:06:37.320 --> 01:06:41.320] And what if he does give the complaints to the grand jury? [01:06:41.320 --> 01:06:42.320] Exactly. [01:06:42.320 --> 01:06:50.320] I once filed criminal charges against all the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals. [01:06:50.320 --> 01:06:54.320] And they didn't get indicted. [01:06:54.320 --> 01:07:02.320] But they spent three months from the first day the grand jury set in office till the last day, [01:07:02.320 --> 01:07:05.320] wondering if their career was going to end tomorrow. [01:07:05.320 --> 01:07:10.320] And there was nothing they could do. [01:07:10.320 --> 01:07:14.320] But I hope the grand jury didn't indict them. [01:07:14.320 --> 01:07:16.320] Well, they didn't. [01:07:16.320 --> 01:07:20.320] But I'm getting ready to try that again. [01:07:20.320 --> 01:07:22.320] I may do it with the governor. [01:07:22.320 --> 01:07:28.320] I'm in the process of preparing a suit against the governor over the mask issues, [01:07:28.320 --> 01:07:33.320] because I had a sheriff's deputy threaten to shoot me if I didn't put a mask, [01:07:33.320 --> 01:07:37.320] if I tried to go into the courthouse without a mask. [01:07:37.320 --> 01:07:40.320] He was a little smart mouth guy. [01:07:40.320 --> 01:07:45.320] So now I'm going to sue the governor because he had a smart mouth. [01:07:45.320 --> 01:07:47.320] That's kind of what it's like. [01:07:47.320 --> 01:07:49.320] You set him up. [01:07:49.320 --> 01:07:53.320] The federal judge is just as susceptible to this as anybody else. [01:07:53.320 --> 01:07:57.320] I filed criminal charges against federal judge McBride. [01:07:57.320 --> 01:08:01.320] He was in his upper 90s and he was a real stinker. [01:08:01.320 --> 01:08:05.320] And he dismissed the case with prejudice for failure to state a claim [01:08:05.320 --> 01:08:09.320] when it was a petition for declaratory judgment. [01:08:09.320 --> 01:08:12.320] So I went straight to the U.S. Attorney and filed criminal charges against him. [01:08:12.320 --> 01:08:18.320] But my client, it was a foreclosure issue and the client just bailed out, [01:08:18.320 --> 01:08:20.320] so I didn't pursue it. [01:08:20.320 --> 01:08:29.320] But when I do it myself, I want to do it over something exactly like Brett is. [01:08:29.320 --> 01:08:33.320] A traffic ticket. [01:08:33.320 --> 01:08:41.320] This guy's trying to get me arrested over a traffic ticket. [01:08:41.320 --> 01:08:43.320] Which the JP already told me. [01:08:43.320 --> 01:08:45.320] I said, well, what if I can't pay? [01:08:45.320 --> 01:08:49.320] And he says, well, I can't make you. [01:08:49.320 --> 01:08:56.320] And it's still, the traffic ticket itself is still awaiting the appeal at the county court. [01:08:56.320 --> 01:09:01.320] But meanwhile, I'm in the Fed dragging the lawyers in there. [01:09:01.320 --> 01:09:12.320] I mean, the last year I checked numbers, there were nine million criminal cases brought in Texas in one year. [01:09:12.320 --> 01:09:18.320] Seven million were traffic. [01:09:18.320 --> 01:09:25.320] These guys got to look at this and say, holy mackerel, what if this thing catches on? [01:09:25.320 --> 01:09:28.320] They can shut us down. [01:09:28.320 --> 01:09:31.320] Over nothing. [01:09:31.320 --> 01:09:35.320] And that's, I have found that, and this is what I want to tell people. [01:09:35.320 --> 01:09:38.320] Don't wait until they do something really horrible. [01:09:38.320 --> 01:09:42.320] Go beat him up over something minor. [01:09:42.320 --> 01:09:46.320] So the judge comes in, he gets his case, he sends it to the magistrate, [01:09:46.320 --> 01:09:51.320] and now he's got this guy trying to get him arrested, [01:09:51.320 --> 01:09:55.320] beating up the US attorney, beating up the special agent in charge, [01:09:55.320 --> 01:09:59.320] filing criminal charges with attorney general in DC. [01:09:59.320 --> 01:10:05.320] But not because of the traffic ticket, only because they're handling everything in a lawless way all along. [01:10:05.320 --> 01:10:07.320] Yeah. [01:10:07.320 --> 01:10:10.320] This is a nothing case. [01:10:10.320 --> 01:10:13.320] And I've got to put up with all this nonsense. [01:10:13.320 --> 01:10:16.320] This is how we fix them. [01:10:16.320 --> 01:10:22.320] If I can have this done to me only something this unimportant. [01:10:22.320 --> 01:10:25.320] How about something more serious? [01:10:25.320 --> 01:10:35.320] I want them to sit there and think that every single case that's filed in the court is a potential landmine. [01:10:35.320 --> 01:10:40.320] You never know which one's going to blow up in your face. [01:10:40.320 --> 01:10:47.320] And this takes me back to the day I walked into my district attorney's office and he's sitting with his head in his hand. [01:10:47.320 --> 01:10:55.320] And I said, what's the matter, Greg? And he looked up at me with this full on look on his face and said, [01:10:55.320 --> 01:11:02.320] those darn grand jurors, you never know what they're going to do. [01:11:02.320 --> 01:11:10.320] And I held both her hands up over my head, looked up at the ceiling and said, there is a God. [01:11:10.320 --> 01:11:16.320] I could not have heard anything better. [01:11:16.320 --> 01:11:23.320] Scalia said any prosecutor worth his salt can get a ham sandwich indicted. [01:11:23.320 --> 01:11:25.320] And I agree with that. [01:11:25.320 --> 01:11:32.320] The problem is keeping the ham sandwich from getting indicted. [01:11:32.320 --> 01:11:36.320] That's a whole other animal. [01:11:36.320 --> 01:11:41.320] That's the one the position therein. [01:11:41.320 --> 01:11:47.320] How do you know when you bring when these complaints are brought before a grand jury, [01:11:47.320 --> 01:11:57.320] that there's not someone on the grand jury who's had a grandson ran through the system railroaded this way? [01:11:57.320 --> 01:12:00.320] You have no idea. [01:12:00.320 --> 01:12:06.320] And that reminds you that when you play fast and loose with rule of law, [01:12:06.320 --> 01:12:13.320] you're playing Russian roulette with your career. If we get our public officials in that position, [01:12:13.320 --> 01:12:16.320] we will have liberty. [01:12:16.320 --> 01:12:24.320] According to Thomas Jefferson, when the people fear the government, there is turning. [01:12:24.320 --> 01:12:30.320] When the government fears the people, there is liberty and we need to instill some fear in them. [01:12:30.320 --> 01:12:37.320] Okay, enough of this. We got a couple of colleagues on the line. We're going to go to Scott in New York. [01:12:37.320 --> 01:12:41.320] Scott, what do you have for us today? [01:12:41.320 --> 01:12:45.320] Hello there. I called in last week. It's the same thing I had last week. [01:12:45.320 --> 01:12:51.320] I found out this afternoon, just like last week, the day before that the city is coming in tomorrow. [01:12:51.320 --> 01:12:53.320] Although there seems to be some gray area. [01:12:53.320 --> 01:13:00.320] Okay, hold on. We don't remember last week. We're old. We sleep. [01:13:00.320 --> 01:13:03.320] Bring us up to speed. Give us this short course. [01:13:03.320 --> 01:13:06.320] I need some sleep now that you mentioned it. [01:13:06.320 --> 01:13:12.320] Last week, I was trying to write a cease and desist letter, [01:13:12.320 --> 01:13:18.320] and I read something that started with something about a creature of God, which should have been a creation of God. [01:13:18.320 --> 01:13:30.320] The deal is, I live in a house of a tenant with an old lady that I haven't been able to speak with for years, [01:13:30.320 --> 01:13:36.320] and I discovered why in July, I had to wake her up when I locked myself out three in the morning, [01:13:36.320 --> 01:13:40.320] and I discovered she had a massive bed-book infestation for at least eight years, [01:13:40.320 --> 01:13:45.320] but I thought I got rid of it many times. It's been a while, but she's been secreting it. [01:13:45.320 --> 01:13:52.320] Adult protective services came on board 5-5 day before her birthday, [01:13:52.320 --> 01:13:57.320] and knocking at the door with a locksmith and all stuff. [01:13:57.320 --> 01:14:02.320] When I read their document, they've been secreting the lawyer. [01:14:02.320 --> 01:14:05.320] First, she was assigned an attorney, then she accepted this other dude. [01:14:05.320 --> 01:14:10.320] It's the same dude that was supposedly helping her five years ago when they were there, [01:14:10.320 --> 01:14:14.320] and he wouldn't give us the files. He was secreting the files then, the case files. [01:14:14.320 --> 01:14:20.320] This time, the attack was so intense, and it really stems from a hate crime from the neighbors [01:14:20.320 --> 01:14:24.320] from before I even got here. When I got here, the place was a wreck. [01:14:24.320 --> 01:14:29.320] The driver was filled with wreck, everything, a car, and I cleaned up the driveway, [01:14:29.320 --> 01:14:36.320] found the foundation that was all cracked, and I noticed that the neighbors didn't appreciate it all, [01:14:36.320 --> 01:14:41.320] and it just carried the hate crime over to me, and there's nothing to do with the woman [01:14:41.320 --> 01:14:44.320] and whatever reason they had to hate her. [01:14:44.320 --> 01:14:49.320] So I wound up putting the stuff back in the driveway to try and get them in court. [01:14:49.320 --> 01:14:55.320] The truth of the matter is that the neighbors nest their haters. [01:14:55.320 --> 01:15:00.320] They've been threatening, slandering me, the tenants, the lady, nonstop. [01:15:00.320 --> 01:15:05.320] It happened before I got here, and then it continued to me, even though I cleaned up the driveway, [01:15:05.320 --> 01:15:10.320] and it turns out the nephew that's the lead hater of the pack works for the city. [01:15:10.320 --> 01:15:17.320] So here's the catch. We share the common causeway, the driveway, and the garage structure behind it, [01:15:17.320 --> 01:15:23.320] and I repaired ours. It had just wood for the roof that leaked, some half inch plywood, [01:15:23.320 --> 01:15:28.320] no window, the doors, and I see six, and I did the whole roof just about. [01:15:28.320 --> 01:15:32.320] It took me a lot of years, of course, at a time. I'm like one course from the top ridge, [01:15:32.320 --> 01:15:37.320] and the neighbor's roof back then had just big holes in it and was sagging, [01:15:37.320 --> 01:15:42.320] and it lets the moisture into the inside of their structure, rotting the members, [01:15:42.320 --> 01:15:46.320] causing the termite damage that I had to remove, causing mine. [01:15:46.320 --> 01:15:47.320] So really... [01:15:47.320 --> 01:15:48.320] Wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:15:48.320 --> 01:15:50.320] One more sentence, and I'll be done. [01:15:50.320 --> 01:15:54.320] You can spend the whole show telling us all this stuff. [01:15:54.320 --> 01:15:58.320] What is the issue you have? [01:15:58.320 --> 01:16:01.320] Bring us to something focused. [01:16:01.320 --> 01:16:04.320] So you forget the emails, I assume? [01:16:04.320 --> 01:16:09.320] Okay, I know who you are now. You've got some annoying neighbors. [01:16:09.320 --> 01:16:14.320] The annoying neighbors are peo-ed at you, and they're sending the city after you. [01:16:14.320 --> 01:16:18.320] Well, I just wanted to explain the full picture. This has been going on for years. [01:16:18.320 --> 01:16:24.320] Okay, so what's the issue right now? What are they doing right now? [01:16:24.320 --> 01:16:30.320] Our garage structure is almost unusable, and it may be condemned if there's collapses, [01:16:30.320 --> 01:16:35.320] and they have never gotten the summons of force to fix their structure. [01:16:35.320 --> 01:16:38.320] Okay, hang on. We'll pick this up on the other side. [01:16:38.320 --> 01:16:45.320] So you're saying that you're being damaged by their failure to maintain their structure. [01:16:45.320 --> 01:16:55.320] Interesting. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio, our call in number 512-646-1984. [01:16:55.320 --> 01:17:00.320] We'll be right back. [01:17:25.320 --> 01:17:29.320] In January, our first hour studies are in the Book of Mark, where we'll go verse by verse [01:17:29.320 --> 01:17:34.320] and discuss the true gospel message. Our second hour topical studies will vary each week [01:17:34.320 --> 01:17:38.320] with discussions on sound doctrine and Christian character development. [01:17:38.320 --> 01:17:43.320] We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear. [01:17:43.320 --> 01:17:50.320] Our goal is to strengthen our faith and to transform ourselves more into the likeness of our Lord and Saviour Jesus. [01:17:50.320 --> 01:17:55.320] So tune into Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. [01:17:55.320 --> 01:18:00.320] to inspire and motivate your studies of the Scriptures. [01:18:00.320 --> 01:18:06.320] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [01:18:06.320 --> 01:18:11.320] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [01:18:11.320 --> 01:18:17.320] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [01:18:17.320 --> 01:18:22.320] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated and mutilated, [01:18:22.320 --> 01:18:25.320] young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [01:18:25.320 --> 01:18:31.320] LogosRadioNetwork gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [01:18:31.320 --> 01:18:34.320] We have come to trust young Jevity so much. [01:18:34.320 --> 01:18:40.320] We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others. [01:18:40.320 --> 01:18:44.320] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve [01:18:44.320 --> 01:18:47.320] as you help support quality radio. [01:18:47.320 --> 01:18:51.320] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [01:18:51.320 --> 01:18:56.320] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, [01:18:56.320 --> 01:19:14.320] and increase your income. Order now. [01:19:26.320 --> 01:19:36.320] Well, it ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. [01:19:36.320 --> 01:19:41.320] I was blindsided, but now I can see your plan. [01:19:41.320 --> 01:19:46.320] You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hand. [01:19:46.320 --> 01:19:55.320] Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. [01:19:55.320 --> 01:20:11.320] Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. [01:20:11.320 --> 01:20:16.320] Ain't gonna drive me with that same old sucker punch. [01:20:16.320 --> 01:20:21.320] I get it now, but then I must have been out too much. [01:20:21.320 --> 01:20:27.320] Back then you had room to move. [01:20:27.320 --> 01:20:30.320] And we have Scott in New York. [01:20:30.320 --> 01:20:32.320] Scott in New York, you're taking care of this. [01:20:32.320 --> 01:20:34.320] You're living in this building. [01:20:34.320 --> 01:20:37.320] You're taking care of this older lady, [01:20:37.320 --> 01:20:43.320] and she has had bed bug infections over and over, [01:20:43.320 --> 01:20:47.320] and the city came out for a wellness check [01:20:47.320 --> 01:20:51.320] and found all these bed bugs. [01:20:51.320 --> 01:20:57.320] Am I correct on that? Hold on, let me unmute you. [01:20:57.320 --> 01:21:03.320] And the next door neighbor didn't fix... [01:21:03.320 --> 01:21:09.320] I guess you have a garage or something that's joined. [01:21:09.320 --> 01:21:15.320] And the next door neighbor hasn't fixed the roof and it's damaged in your side. [01:21:15.320 --> 01:21:18.320] You had a bunch of stuff in the driveway and you took it out [01:21:18.320 --> 01:21:22.320] and they were so crappy to you, you put it all back in the driveway. [01:21:22.320 --> 01:21:25.320] In order to get them and the city workers that are saying that's a violation, [01:21:25.320 --> 01:21:27.320] but you have it incorrect. [01:21:27.320 --> 01:21:31.320] No, I've gotten rid of bed bugs several times, including help with the tenants. [01:21:31.320 --> 01:21:34.320] The owner has never had a break from them. [01:21:34.320 --> 01:21:36.320] She's just kept them secret. [01:21:36.320 --> 01:21:39.320] And I'm claiming that... [01:21:39.320 --> 01:21:41.320] So I'll bring it up to date now. [01:21:41.320 --> 01:21:44.320] The last week they all showed up at 9 in the morning [01:21:44.320 --> 01:21:49.320] and I read this document that shows that adult protective services [01:21:49.320 --> 01:21:52.320] does not have the authority to provide her services to her [01:21:52.320 --> 01:21:57.320] because she doesn't meet any of the three criteria that are necessary in order to be eligible. [01:21:57.320 --> 01:22:02.320] You must meet all the following criteria to be eligible for protective services. [01:22:02.320 --> 01:22:06.320] C, have no one available who is willing and able to assist you responsible. [01:22:06.320 --> 01:22:12.320] All of these people, including her attorney and all the agents, know that I'm here. [01:22:12.320 --> 01:22:15.320] So they should never have been here in the first place. [01:22:15.320 --> 01:22:19.320] And they're the ones that hired the construction crew that's coming. [01:22:19.320 --> 01:22:22.320] Wait a minute. Who are you relative to this woman? [01:22:22.320 --> 01:22:26.320] Are you a relative to her or just a tenant? [01:22:26.320 --> 01:22:31.320] I'm only a tenant and I'm a witness and I... [01:22:31.320 --> 01:22:34.320] Do you have any kind of power of attorney for this woman? [01:22:34.320 --> 01:22:36.320] No, not yet. No. [01:22:36.320 --> 01:22:43.320] She, by letting this guy represent her, that's why I realized that he's the criminal. [01:22:43.320 --> 01:22:46.320] He's harming her and me and the animals. [01:22:46.320 --> 01:22:49.320] And I have the evidence of that in the emails. [01:22:49.320 --> 01:22:51.320] And still, as of last week, now... [01:22:51.320 --> 01:22:56.320] Okay, hold on, hold on. How do you have standing, legal standing to raise an issue? [01:22:56.320 --> 01:22:59.320] I don't. I don't. [01:22:59.320 --> 01:23:00.320] Oh. [01:23:00.320 --> 01:23:03.320] That's what I'm going to get with all the stuff in the driveway. [01:23:03.320 --> 01:23:06.320] And instead, they've just escalated and they've been seeking... [01:23:06.320 --> 01:23:07.320] Wait a minute. [01:23:07.320 --> 01:23:10.320] That's why you put all the stuff in the driveway? [01:23:10.320 --> 01:23:14.320] Pretty much, yeah. Although, I had some of it as some legitimate work. [01:23:14.320 --> 01:23:17.320] Wait a minute. Did you do that to be annoying? [01:23:17.320 --> 01:23:21.320] No, I did that in order to get this to not be a civil matter, [01:23:21.320 --> 01:23:26.320] so that I can get the neighbors and the city that's saying that we have a violation, [01:23:26.320 --> 01:23:32.320] but yet the same city agencies won't give them a violation, which is actually a real danger. [01:23:32.320 --> 01:23:37.320] So, I have, like, from another piece of... [01:23:37.320 --> 01:23:43.320] Unless the petition is repair, crew and contractor is allowed to access the subject premises [01:23:43.320 --> 01:23:46.320] to affect the aforementioned emergency repairs, [01:23:46.320 --> 01:23:51.320] the health, welfare and safety of the tenants residing in said premises shall be placed in a meet. [01:23:51.320 --> 01:23:56.320] There is no tenants that set me. They all left because the conditions were bad, [01:23:56.320 --> 01:23:58.320] some of them because of the bed bugs. [01:23:58.320 --> 01:24:07.320] Well, it sounds like the city has a legitimate concern that the building is a health hazard. [01:24:07.320 --> 01:24:11.320] Well, don't they have to give me due process? They're harming me. [01:24:11.320 --> 01:24:12.320] No. [01:24:12.320 --> 01:24:13.320] They'll harm me more. [01:24:13.320 --> 01:24:15.320] No, no, no. You're just a tenant. [01:24:15.320 --> 01:24:19.320] You're not the owner. They would have to be dealing with the owner. [01:24:19.320 --> 01:24:26.320] And then, in the same breath, the worker, the case, was saying that they told her. [01:24:26.320 --> 01:24:29.320] But the reason they're here is they know that she's incompetent. [01:24:29.320 --> 01:24:31.320] I'm saying it's because of the bed bugs. [01:24:31.320 --> 01:24:35.320] They're saying it's because it's that she needs adult protective services because she... [01:24:35.320 --> 01:24:37.320] Wait, wait, wait. How old is this woman? [01:24:37.320 --> 01:24:42.320] She's old. 400? I don't know. [01:24:42.320 --> 01:24:46.320] I actually don't know. I think she's the same age as my mom. [01:24:46.320 --> 01:24:50.320] She's up there. And now she's used to working for a few years. [01:24:50.320 --> 01:24:55.320] So, does she have anyone, does she have family or anyone who takes care of her? [01:24:55.320 --> 01:25:00.320] Only me. The sister is trying to get the guardianship, but she truly can't do it. [01:25:00.320 --> 01:25:01.320] She's not here. [01:25:01.320 --> 01:25:09.320] So, what I'm trying to do now is just to write up a cease and desist notice to go out and make copies and provide it. [01:25:09.320 --> 01:25:12.320] You can't. You don't have any static. [01:25:12.320 --> 01:25:16.320] They would just look at your note and say, who the heck is this? [01:25:16.320 --> 01:25:20.320] Now they're coming at me. They're going to harm me. And I'm witness of the hate crime. [01:25:20.320 --> 01:25:23.320] So, when I tried to report that to the police last week... [01:25:23.320 --> 01:25:28.320] How did you get to hate crime? What are the elements of hate crime? [01:25:28.320 --> 01:25:34.320] The racist neighbors slandering... [01:25:34.320 --> 01:25:39.320] No, no, no, no, no, no. This is not... I'm not asking you what they did. [01:25:39.320 --> 01:25:48.320] In order to claim a hate crime, hate crime is going to have a set of elements that define a hate crime. [01:25:48.320 --> 01:25:51.320] I don't know any of that, but let me finish about the police thing. [01:25:51.320 --> 01:25:56.320] Wait a minute. Wait a minute. You can't say I'm going to file a hate crime and you... [01:25:56.320 --> 01:26:01.320] On this next breath, so you don't even know what one is. [01:26:01.320 --> 01:26:06.320] I know that I'm being hated on from these neighbors, despite even the fact that... [01:26:06.320 --> 01:26:08.320] That's a whole different issue. [01:26:08.320 --> 01:26:16.320] A hate crime is a statute. It is a criminal act, and every criminal act has a set of elements. [01:26:16.320 --> 01:26:22.320] Before you can make the claim, you have to know what the elements are. [01:26:22.320 --> 01:26:28.320] Brett, while we're talking, will you pull up hate crime and see if you can find us a set of elements? [01:26:28.320 --> 01:26:30.320] Well, if you let me... [01:26:30.320 --> 01:26:33.320] No, no, wait, wait. You're just complaining. [01:26:33.320 --> 01:26:37.320] And complaining. You're just going on one thing after another after another. [01:26:37.320 --> 01:26:42.320] If we're going to help you, we have to give you some tools to work with. [01:26:42.320 --> 01:26:47.320] If you believe there's a hate crime, now let's figure out what a hate crime is. [01:26:47.320 --> 01:26:52.320] And then look at... You probably got all the elements that you need. [01:26:52.320 --> 01:26:54.320] I'm sure I do. [01:26:54.320 --> 01:27:03.320] But you need to know what they are, and then we can walk down the facts and find the ones that fit your hate crime. [01:27:03.320 --> 01:27:09.320] Then you can prepare a affidavit that addresses all the elements. [01:27:09.320 --> 01:27:12.320] Because when you bring an issue... [01:27:12.320 --> 01:27:17.320] Tomorrow, what I'm called now is to try and get help writing a cease and desist letter that I've been writing all during your show. [01:27:17.320 --> 01:27:22.320] I actually thought it was a repeat in the beginning, and then it got really loud, and it seemed to be loud. [01:27:22.320 --> 01:27:27.320] But if you let me finish about what happened with the police last week, you'll see what happened. [01:27:27.320 --> 01:27:31.320] All you're doing is complaining about all the bad things that happened. [01:27:31.320 --> 01:27:40.320] You're trying to give him exculpatory evidence, and instead, he only listens... [01:27:40.320 --> 01:27:44.320] Who exculpatory evidence for what? [01:27:44.320 --> 01:27:49.320] That the lawyer is harming, not helping. [01:27:49.320 --> 01:27:54.320] Now, as of last week, he's harming me, and he's doing it from many, many different ways and means. [01:27:54.320 --> 01:27:57.320] And the evidence is in the emails that I mailed you. [01:27:57.320 --> 01:28:03.320] The emails to the case worker that was proven to be a liar, and that he had her testify. [01:28:03.320 --> 01:28:05.320] And I don't know anything that's going on in court. [01:28:05.320 --> 01:28:08.320] I've been remained out of court so I could be a witness. [01:28:08.320 --> 01:28:13.320] I've been remaining here, and I've been working with the attorney, and everything I gave him to help her, [01:28:13.320 --> 01:28:18.320] he secreted and did other things behind his back and lying, and won't give us... [01:28:18.320 --> 01:28:22.320] Have you filed bar grievances against the attorney? [01:28:22.320 --> 01:28:29.320] Well, Tina sent me some bar grievances yesterday, but I realized that that's... [01:28:29.320 --> 01:28:34.320] Now, I need to really do a statement of facts, a sworn statement of facts, rebutting what I'll do, [01:28:34.320 --> 01:28:36.320] but I haven't had a chance to do that. [01:28:36.320 --> 01:28:43.320] I thought I got some break last week, and then yesterday, today, I found out at 3 in the afternoon [01:28:43.320 --> 01:28:45.320] that they're coming again tomorrow in the morning. [01:28:45.320 --> 01:28:51.320] And the trick is, the case workers, that he or the lady is... [01:28:51.320 --> 01:28:53.320] Wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:28:53.320 --> 01:29:00.320] You're using up our show, hashing over all the bad things, and we're not getting anywhere. [01:29:00.320 --> 01:29:05.320] Have you written up a statement of facts on these issues? [01:29:05.320 --> 01:29:08.320] I won't have time to do that by tomorrow. It's ten years worth of facts. [01:29:08.320 --> 01:29:14.320] No, no, no, no, no. You can't do anything without a statement of facts. [01:29:14.320 --> 01:29:22.320] What we generally... No, no, I'm going to let you run on and on and complain about it. [01:29:22.320 --> 01:29:30.320] This does no good. If you don't have some focus or direction, you're just complaining. [01:29:30.320 --> 01:29:39.320] If you're going to get anything done, I need to get me a statement of facts or a timeline, timeline of events. [01:29:39.320 --> 01:29:41.320] You don't have to have all the facts. [01:29:41.320 --> 01:29:49.320] This happened, the order of things happened. You're jumping all over the place, and we're not getting anywhere. [01:29:49.320 --> 01:29:55.320] Give me some kind of statement, and then email that to me, and then call in next week. [01:29:55.320 --> 01:30:00.320] Randy Kelton, Brent Fountain, Louisville Radio, we'll be right back. [01:30:02.320 --> 01:30:09.320] Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing. [01:30:09.320 --> 01:30:12.320] But now researchers say we can add stress to the list. [01:30:12.320 --> 01:30:41.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment. [01:30:42.320 --> 01:30:45.320] Start over with Start Page. [01:31:12.320 --> 01:31:37.320] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [01:31:37.320 --> 01:31:43.320] It says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.320 --> 01:31:46.320] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.320 --> 01:31:49.320] And thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:49.320 --> 01:31:50.320] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:50.320 --> 01:31:51.320] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:51.320 --> 01:31:52.320] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:52.320 --> 01:31:53.320] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.320 --> 01:31:55.320] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.320 --> 01:31:58.320] We are Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.320 --> 01:32:01.320] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:01.320 --> 01:32:08.320] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America, we live in an us against them society. [01:32:08.320 --> 01:32:13.320] If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:32:13.320 --> 01:32:18.320] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, [01:32:18.320 --> 01:32:20.320] and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [01:32:20.320 --> 01:32:26.320] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [01:32:26.320 --> 01:32:31.320] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [01:32:31.320 --> 01:32:35.320] that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the Rule of Law. [01:32:35.320 --> 01:32:41.320] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [01:32:41.320 --> 01:32:45.320] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [01:32:45.320 --> 01:32:48.320] video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. [01:32:48.320 --> 01:32:51.320] Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. [01:32:51.320 --> 01:32:55.320] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [01:32:55.320 --> 01:33:00.320] Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve. [01:33:25.320 --> 01:33:50.320] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to Tina in California. [01:33:50.320 --> 01:33:55.320] Hello, Ms. Tina. What do you have for us today? [01:33:55.320 --> 01:34:05.320] Well, I have two questions. One is about the case that we are getting the judgment on tomorrow. [01:34:05.320 --> 01:34:09.320] We tried to work with the defendants to do... [01:34:09.320 --> 01:34:12.320] Wait a minute, Ms. Tina, are you on that Bluetooth? [01:34:12.320 --> 01:34:16.320] No, I'm not. I took it off before I even got on the phone. [01:34:16.320 --> 01:34:20.320] I'm still kind of muffled. Maybe it's my headset. [01:34:20.320 --> 01:34:24.320] Sounds fine to me. [01:34:24.320 --> 01:34:31.320] So we tried to work with them. They refused to give us their place of work and proof of their income. [01:34:31.320 --> 01:34:35.320] They say they'll only give it to a third party. [01:34:35.320 --> 01:34:41.320] And it's going to take them two years to make payments to any stipulated judgment. [01:34:41.320 --> 01:34:49.320] They'll get their discharge if we agree to a stipulated judgment, which means that we don't really have any protection if they say, [01:34:49.320 --> 01:34:53.320] well, we'll pay three payments, four payments, we're going to quit. [01:34:53.320 --> 01:34:56.320] And then we write back where we started. [01:34:56.320 --> 01:35:05.320] So I was thinking of writing a declaration letter to the judge and I'm not sure if this is okay. [01:35:05.320 --> 01:35:13.320] He gave us till 5 p.m. tomorrow or for them to write this stipulation, not us. [01:35:13.320 --> 01:35:18.320] And when we gave them some very straightforward facts, how can we trust you? [01:35:18.320 --> 01:35:23.320] You've told us you'll send money before. It never happened. [01:35:23.320 --> 01:35:27.320] And a few things with very polite email. [01:35:27.320 --> 01:35:33.320] And they said, well, it's into your benefit to settle with us out of court, really? [01:35:33.320 --> 01:35:37.320] I didn't think it was our benefit. It's not out of court. It's in court. [01:35:37.320 --> 01:35:42.320] But anyway, and she said, well, if you weren't settled, then we're going to file an appeal. [01:35:42.320 --> 01:35:47.320] We'll go right ahead because the judge didn't do anything wrong and you don't understand what an appeal is. [01:35:47.320 --> 01:35:52.320] But that's okay. They have every right to file an appeal and we can respond. [01:35:52.320 --> 01:35:59.320] Is it okay, do you think, to write to the judge and say, per your suggestion at this hearing, [01:35:59.320 --> 01:36:08.320] we attempted to do a stipulated judgment with the defendants but negotiations broke down because of ABC [01:36:08.320 --> 01:36:14.320] and we feel we're more protected with a judgment where they don't get their discharge [01:36:14.320 --> 01:36:22.320] and then reiterate the three things that we asked for or do you think that's like over the top? [01:36:22.320 --> 01:36:29.320] I was trying to go and keep it quite polite and just simple and to the point that we took of his suggestions, [01:36:29.320 --> 01:36:37.320] the talks broke down, we'd like him to rule based on what we put in the stipulated, you know, [01:36:37.320 --> 01:36:41.320] stipulation, pre-trust stipulation. [01:36:41.320 --> 01:36:44.320] What are your thoughts? [01:36:44.320 --> 01:36:48.320] Brett, can you respond to that? I'm having trouble understanding. [01:36:48.320 --> 01:37:00.320] Well, she's asking what, yeah, well, my thoughts are what would be the appropriate way to get this message to the judge [01:37:00.320 --> 01:37:08.320] in a way that's not going to be ex parte, you know, here's just one message from one party to the judge, [01:37:08.320 --> 01:37:14.320] but something that is a regular document that you give the other side a copy of [01:37:14.320 --> 01:37:20.320] and what occurs to me is a notice. [01:37:20.320 --> 01:37:28.320] If you give a notice to the court that says we had such and such honor about this date, [01:37:28.320 --> 01:37:31.320] we did what you said, judge. [01:37:31.320 --> 01:37:41.320] We had these attempts, attempted some mediation, some resolution via these other methods [01:37:41.320 --> 01:37:51.320] and talks broke down in that the owing party was unwilling to provide any sort of guarantee [01:37:51.320 --> 01:38:00.320] that they would keep their word this time or do anything differently than they did last time. [01:38:00.320 --> 01:38:03.320] You know, something that says, here's what happened. [01:38:03.320 --> 01:38:09.320] And you're putting it out there as a notice, that way you can just give the other side a copy. [01:38:09.320 --> 01:38:11.320] I think Randy, will that work? [01:38:11.320 --> 01:38:14.320] It's not a motion. [01:38:14.320 --> 01:38:19.320] The judge knows what's going on. [01:38:19.320 --> 01:38:25.320] And you just need to demonstrate to him that you exercised due diligence. [01:38:25.320 --> 01:38:31.320] You tried to get along with the person and they were not forthcoming. [01:38:31.320 --> 01:38:37.320] And you could not come to an agreement and ask the judge to just stipulate an agreement, a ruling. [01:38:37.320 --> 01:38:39.320] Okay. [01:38:39.320 --> 01:38:41.320] We made a good faith effort. [01:38:41.320 --> 01:38:43.320] Yes, that's what I wanted to put. [01:38:43.320 --> 01:38:45.320] We made a good faith effort. [01:38:45.320 --> 01:38:47.320] They refused to give us the information. [01:38:47.320 --> 01:38:54.320] Now, if we go and get the judgment, we can go get a debt examination and we'll get the information anyway. [01:38:54.320 --> 01:39:00.320] But, you know, we're not knowing what the judge is going to order for us and give us. [01:39:00.320 --> 01:39:03.320] It makes it a little difficult. [01:39:03.320 --> 01:39:13.320] But, you know, I guess I'll put a notice and I'll send them an email, the other side an email notice in the afternoon and they can respond or whatever. [01:39:13.320 --> 01:39:16.320] And let's see what, let's see what happens. [01:39:16.320 --> 01:39:18.320] So thank you for your input there. [01:39:18.320 --> 01:39:21.320] Hey, I had an idea, Tina, just a moment before you go. [01:39:21.320 --> 01:39:22.320] I had an idea. [01:39:22.320 --> 01:39:24.320] Maybe you could roll a motion into this. [01:39:24.320 --> 01:39:37.320] And it could be a motion that when the judge does issue his order as he was contemplating doing in the pre-trial stipulations, [01:39:37.320 --> 01:39:45.320] when he does issue his order, that he would also accompany his order with a writ of execution. [01:39:45.320 --> 01:39:47.320] That way it's a motion. [01:39:47.320 --> 01:39:49.320] And you're also asking for teeth. [01:39:49.320 --> 01:39:55.320] You're saying as soon as you give your signature on that dotted line, I can go sell his car. [01:39:55.320 --> 01:39:58.320] Okay. [01:39:58.320 --> 01:40:00.320] Well, I can ask for that. [01:40:00.320 --> 01:40:05.320] I mean, in bankruptcy, they have 14 days to appeal anything. [01:40:05.320 --> 01:40:13.320] And apparently we would be okay going for 24 months if they didn't get the discharge. [01:40:13.320 --> 01:40:18.320] But everything I've read and talked to a couple of attorneys who really weren't sure of the answer. [01:40:18.320 --> 01:40:24.320] But they gave me their best guess is that courts, when there's a final, they just want it over. [01:40:24.320 --> 01:40:25.320] They want to be done. [01:40:25.320 --> 01:40:29.320] They don't want to hold a discharge over the next 24 months. [01:40:29.320 --> 01:40:31.320] They just want the case to be. [01:40:31.320 --> 01:40:32.320] Yes. [01:40:32.320 --> 01:40:33.320] Don't say that. [01:40:33.320 --> 01:40:35.320] Don't even bring up the 24 months. [01:40:35.320 --> 01:40:38.320] Just say you want this over too. [01:40:38.320 --> 01:40:41.320] Just say here's your notice. [01:40:41.320 --> 01:40:44.320] Notice and motion for writ of execution. [01:40:44.320 --> 01:40:49.320] And could be like one page long, you could be done. [01:40:49.320 --> 01:40:50.320] Okay. [01:40:50.320 --> 01:40:51.320] That sounds good. [01:40:51.320 --> 01:40:52.320] I mean, I can do my best. [01:40:52.320 --> 01:40:57.320] What are you going to do if we do it right and we do it politely and professionally? [01:40:57.320 --> 01:41:00.320] You know, he can say yay or nay. [01:41:00.320 --> 01:41:01.320] Exactly. [01:41:01.320 --> 01:41:02.320] Thank you for that. [01:41:02.320 --> 01:41:05.320] And when you keep it short and sweet like that, what can the other side do? [01:41:05.320 --> 01:41:12.320] There's nothing that the opposing party could challenge about that. [01:41:12.320 --> 01:41:16.320] Wait, no, we wanted to get out scot free without a writ of execution. [01:41:16.320 --> 01:41:19.320] That would be harmful to us. [01:41:19.320 --> 01:41:24.320] Yeah, we thought it was hysterical that they said, well, this would be in your best interest [01:41:24.320 --> 01:41:26.320] to settle with us. [01:41:26.320 --> 01:41:27.320] Really? [01:41:27.320 --> 01:41:33.320] Why would it be in our best interest when the judge is likely to give us a much larger judgment? [01:41:33.320 --> 01:41:36.320] Well, did you go ahead and bar grieve them for that? [01:41:36.320 --> 01:41:40.320] Well, no, that was the, that was not their attorney because they don't have an attorney. [01:41:40.320 --> 01:41:47.320] They're working on their own because they've burned every attorney they've hired. [01:41:47.320 --> 01:41:51.320] Literally, I figured we'd burn them. [01:41:51.320 --> 01:41:53.320] So you could just bar grieve the last attorney they had. [01:41:53.320 --> 01:41:54.320] Oops, I'm sorry. [01:41:54.320 --> 01:41:56.320] You're not on the case anymore. [01:41:56.320 --> 01:42:02.320] Well, I'm actually bar grieving the last attorney they have in the criminal case because I did [01:42:02.320 --> 01:42:08.320] find out that he was the one who told, who downloaded that case of mine and told them [01:42:08.320 --> 01:42:11.320] to say that I filed lawsuits for a living. [01:42:11.320 --> 01:42:14.320] So he's getting a bar grieve, but that's in the criminal. [01:42:14.320 --> 01:42:15.320] Yeah. [01:42:15.320 --> 01:42:18.320] So he's not going to be happy. [01:42:18.320 --> 01:42:21.320] But my next question is slightly different. [01:42:21.320 --> 01:42:28.320] It relates to the foreclosure and I found a trustee sale guarantee in my loan file that [01:42:28.320 --> 01:42:30.320] I was never supposed to see. [01:42:30.320 --> 01:42:40.320] It was ordered on the day they sent the notice of default and it says in there, and it was [01:42:40.320 --> 01:42:43.320] by Chicago Title. [01:42:43.320 --> 01:42:51.320] And it says that the name of a short is the first substitute trustee, Meridian Foreclosure [01:42:51.320 --> 01:42:55.320] Services, with the one with bank as the beneficiary. [01:42:55.320 --> 01:43:01.320] It says the title to set a state is vested in my name, et cetera. [01:43:01.320 --> 01:43:07.320] And the land referred to it and it says there was a fee paid of $760. [01:43:07.320 --> 01:43:13.320] Now, I've been trying to, and that fee was charged to my loan balance. [01:43:13.320 --> 01:43:20.320] I have been trying to find out from Chicago Title if there was, if there's a, you know, [01:43:20.320 --> 01:43:27.320] a claim, ever a claim on this, do they have, you know, a title number on this? [01:43:27.320 --> 01:43:33.320] I've never seen anything like this where it says, you know, a trustee sale. [01:43:33.320 --> 01:43:35.320] So they won't answer me. [01:43:35.320 --> 01:43:39.320] What can I do on this? [01:43:39.320 --> 01:43:43.320] Oh, you're running me off the cliff. [01:43:43.320 --> 01:43:51.320] Nothing very truly selfish. [01:43:51.320 --> 01:43:53.320] Okay. [01:43:53.320 --> 01:44:15.320] Hang on. [01:44:15.320 --> 01:44:30.320] ırôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôôô [01:44:45.320 --> 01:44:59.040] Michael Miris Banner or email michaelmiris at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors [01:44:59.040 --> 01:45:00.040] next. [01:45:00.040 --> 01:45:04.360] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.360 --> 01:45:11.080] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand 4-CD course [01:45:11.080 --> 01:45:15.280] that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [01:45:15.280 --> 01:45:19.280] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.280 --> 01:45:23.080] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.080 --> 01:45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.520] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [01:45:34.520 --> 01:45:39.200] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [01:45:39.200 --> 01:45:43.520] the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.520 --> 01:45:49.640] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [01:45:49.640 --> 01:45:52.320] pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.320 --> 01:46:16.320] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:22.320 --> 01:46:47.320] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:46:47.320 --> 01:46:59.040] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, with our radio, and we're talking to Tina [01:46:59.040 --> 01:47:00.040] in California. [01:47:00.040 --> 01:47:07.280] Tina, I'm having a little trouble with stability, I'm losing the high tones. [01:47:07.280 --> 01:47:11.560] You were addressing your foreclosure when we went out? [01:47:11.560 --> 01:47:17.840] Yes, a trustee's sale guarantee is a document that I found in my loan file that I'm not [01:47:17.840 --> 01:47:19.340] supposed to have. [01:47:19.340 --> 01:47:26.960] The trustee's sale guarantee was taken out on the very day they filed a notice of default. [01:47:26.960 --> 01:47:33.040] They billed, it was the fee for it was $7.65, which they added to my loan balance. [01:47:33.040 --> 01:47:41.240] It says the liability is $451,000, the name of assured is the foreclosure service, which [01:47:41.240 --> 01:47:47.840] was the first substitute trustee, and the beneficiary was the bank. [01:47:47.840 --> 01:47:53.960] And you know, how do I find out if, first of all, why would they pay to take this out [01:47:53.960 --> 01:47:55.800] with Chicago Title? [01:47:55.800 --> 01:48:00.680] What is a trustee's sale guarantee, and did they get paid on it? [01:48:00.680 --> 01:48:04.680] I'm returning my calls to Anthony. [01:48:04.680 --> 01:48:10.680] Brett, could you understand that I'm having a terrible time with it? [01:48:10.680 --> 01:48:16.000] Well, she, from what I'm gathering, I don't know what the names of these documents mean [01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:24.040] and the assignments of different things to the mortgage players, but it sounds to me [01:48:24.040 --> 01:48:30.320] like she has uncovered some fraud when somebody gave her a document that they apparently didn't [01:48:30.320 --> 01:48:36.560] realize they were giving her, and it reveals that they were doing something underhanded [01:48:36.560 --> 01:48:41.160] about the whole shuffle to get her property. [01:48:41.160 --> 01:48:45.280] And now she's trying to figure out what to do about that. [01:48:45.280 --> 01:48:52.320] Okay, I'm having trouble understanding you on this medium. [01:48:52.320 --> 01:48:54.120] Will you call me tomorrow, Tina? [01:48:54.120 --> 01:48:59.040] I will, and in the meantime, I'll send you both this trustee's sale guarantee so you [01:48:59.040 --> 01:49:06.440] can read it and try to understand it, because I'm not sure what it means and how to find [01:49:06.440 --> 01:49:07.960] out what happened. [01:49:07.960 --> 01:49:12.360] And I'll do that in a way so that you can go to one more caller before the show ends. [01:49:12.360 --> 01:49:14.360] Okay, thank you, Tina. [01:49:14.360 --> 01:49:16.360] Okay, thank you. [01:49:16.360 --> 01:49:22.200] Okay, now, we've got two callers, we've got Charles and Georgia, but we've also got Jill [01:49:22.200 --> 01:49:23.200] and Oregon. [01:49:23.200 --> 01:49:32.280] It looks like a first-time caller, Brett, your call, Jill or Charles? [01:49:32.280 --> 01:49:39.920] Well, I know that Jill was trying to call in earlier, I don't know if it was, we had [01:49:39.920 --> 01:49:44.720] a, when your call board was on and off. [01:49:44.720 --> 01:49:47.920] Yeah, let me see if she's a first-time caller. [01:49:47.920 --> 01:49:50.320] Jill, are you there? [01:49:50.320 --> 01:49:52.320] Yes. [01:49:52.320 --> 01:49:53.320] Are you a first-time caller? [01:49:53.320 --> 01:49:57.320] No, I called in last year. [01:49:57.320 --> 01:50:02.960] Okay, and I need to take Charles first, he's been on quite a bit longer. [01:50:02.960 --> 01:50:03.960] Okay. [01:50:03.960 --> 01:50:07.960] Let me take Charles, maybe he won't be real, take a long time. [01:50:07.960 --> 01:50:12.520] Okay, Charles, what do you have for us today? [01:50:12.520 --> 01:50:15.400] How are you doing today, Randy? [01:50:15.400 --> 01:50:16.400] Doing good. [01:50:16.400 --> 01:50:21.880] I just had a quick question, and then you can get right to Jill. [01:50:21.880 --> 01:50:29.720] I've been thinking about Olivier for the last couple of months, and I was wondering, had [01:50:29.720 --> 01:50:37.760] he gotten anywhere with the vague, I'm sorry, void for vagueness. [01:50:37.760 --> 01:50:44.080] He hasn't, I haven't heard from him in quite a while. [01:50:44.080 --> 01:50:51.120] If you will send me an email and ask about Marty Shay, I will forward that to him. [01:50:51.120 --> 01:50:57.320] He'll remind me of contact him, I'll get his email and forward your comments and your questions [01:50:57.320 --> 01:50:58.320] to him. [01:50:58.320 --> 01:50:59.320] Okay, no problem. [01:50:59.320 --> 01:51:00.320] No problem. [01:51:00.320 --> 01:51:01.320] Thanks a lot, Randy. [01:51:01.320 --> 01:51:04.320] I'll talk to you guys in a minute. [01:51:04.320 --> 01:51:05.320] Okay. [01:51:05.320 --> 01:51:06.320] Thank you, Charles. [01:51:06.320 --> 01:51:08.480] Now we're going back to Jill and Oregon. [01:51:08.480 --> 01:51:11.640] Okay, Jill, what do you have for us today? [01:51:11.640 --> 01:51:14.200] So, I called last year. [01:51:14.200 --> 01:51:20.200] I was a teacher who was fired because of Kate Brown's Vag's mandate. [01:51:20.200 --> 01:51:27.880] And I'm planning to sue everyone from Kate Brown down the line, the health authority, [01:51:27.880 --> 01:51:33.120] my school, HR, the union, everyone. [01:51:33.120 --> 01:51:38.440] When I called last year, you suggested that I do a petition for declaratory judgment, [01:51:38.440 --> 01:51:41.840] and I did that against the health authority. [01:51:41.840 --> 01:51:46.560] Basically, I was a... [01:51:46.560 --> 01:51:49.160] What question did you ask? [01:51:49.160 --> 01:51:58.120] The last time, you suggested that I do the declaratory judgment to kind of get my feet [01:51:58.120 --> 01:52:09.480] wet and to get a ruling on something that would trigger fault, basically. [01:52:09.480 --> 01:52:20.600] So what I did was I filed a suit to see if the health authority acted out of scope. [01:52:20.600 --> 01:52:27.880] And what happened was after a long fight in the circuit court, the assistant attorney [01:52:27.880 --> 01:52:34.400] general managed to get it transferred to the court of appeals, which has exclusive jurisdiction [01:52:34.400 --> 01:52:40.760] over Administrative Procedure Act claims. [01:52:40.760 --> 01:52:47.960] Now the problem is adjudication under the Administrative Procedure Act is limited, [01:52:47.960 --> 01:52:52.920] and the only thing I can get from that would be an invalidation of the rule, which is not [01:52:52.920 --> 01:52:54.520] what I want. [01:52:54.520 --> 01:53:00.040] I want a judgment saying that the OHA acted out of scope. [01:53:00.040 --> 01:53:04.920] Now at this point in time, I am ready to file suit against all of them. [01:53:04.920 --> 01:53:09.120] Okay, okay, wait, wait, wait, wait. [01:53:09.120 --> 01:53:10.120] You're asking... [01:53:10.120 --> 01:53:16.120] Okay, they're looking to invalidate the rule, and that will give you... [01:53:16.120 --> 01:53:20.400] That will essentially give you what you want. [01:53:20.400 --> 01:53:21.400] Not quite. [01:53:21.400 --> 01:53:22.400] No. [01:53:22.400 --> 01:53:23.400] No, it won't. [01:53:23.400 --> 01:53:24.400] Not quite. [01:53:24.400 --> 01:53:27.400] It'll kind of be a thing that it wasn't valid, right? [01:53:27.400 --> 01:53:28.400] Yeah. [01:53:28.400 --> 01:53:34.480] But it's not expo facto. [01:53:34.480 --> 01:53:46.520] If they rule that the rule is invalid, then the litigant can claim that they acted in [01:53:46.520 --> 01:53:47.640] good faith reliance. [01:53:47.640 --> 01:53:49.000] So I see where you're going. [01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:51.120] How do you plan to fix that? [01:53:51.120 --> 01:53:59.360] So I'm thinking of actually filing an objection to the court's ruling that is an Administrative [01:53:59.360 --> 01:54:06.280] Procedure Act and then just dismissing that case, because I don't think it's going to [01:54:06.280 --> 01:54:13.680] help me for me to pursue it under the Administrative Procedure Act, because my main intention [01:54:13.680 --> 01:54:16.760] was never to invalidate the rule. [01:54:16.760 --> 01:54:23.680] My main intention was that they acted out of scope, and I was wondering what your thoughts [01:54:23.680 --> 01:54:26.240] were on that. [01:54:26.240 --> 01:54:30.960] I'm thinking about declaratory judgment. [01:54:30.960 --> 01:54:32.400] You might file an... [01:54:32.400 --> 01:54:34.120] Have they filed a... [01:54:34.120 --> 01:54:35.120] Okay. [01:54:35.120 --> 01:54:36.920] How did we get to this place? [01:54:36.920 --> 01:54:43.040] What I'm getting to is, do we file an appeal or do we file an objection? [01:54:43.040 --> 01:54:50.400] Have they filed something that's not a dispositive ruling? [01:54:50.400 --> 01:54:57.760] So what happened was the trial court can refer the case to the Appeals Court if it's not [01:54:57.760 --> 01:55:00.200] sure on its jurisdiction. [01:55:00.200 --> 01:55:02.280] It went to the Appeals Court. [01:55:02.280 --> 01:55:07.160] The Magistrate of the Appeals Court determined that it was an Administrative Procedure [01:55:07.160 --> 01:55:08.160] Act suit. [01:55:08.160 --> 01:55:14.320] They asked a motion for reconsideration and clarification on why they were ruling outside [01:55:14.320 --> 01:55:21.280] of the pleading, and yesterday I got a ruling back from the judges denying my motion without [01:55:21.280 --> 01:55:22.640] any reasons. [01:55:22.640 --> 01:55:24.640] Oh, okay. [01:55:24.640 --> 01:55:29.040] I saw your comment on the Telegram channel. [01:55:29.040 --> 01:55:34.120] Yes, request findings of fact and conclusions at law. [01:55:34.120 --> 01:55:40.600] Actually, for my unemployment, that's a different case. [01:55:40.600 --> 01:55:48.320] So I got two denials, and both of them did not have findings of fact. [01:55:48.320 --> 01:55:54.680] And for the declaratory judgment case, I actually already filed for a request of findings of [01:55:54.680 --> 01:56:01.720] fact under the Petition for Reconsideration, and they denied everything with no reason [01:56:01.720 --> 01:56:02.720] given. [01:56:02.720 --> 01:56:08.000] Then that would be, okay, that was in the appellate court. [01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:11.880] Can they deny a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law? [01:56:11.880 --> 01:56:14.240] Is that something they get to deny? [01:56:14.240 --> 01:56:19.960] Or is that an administrative duty they have to respond to that request? [01:56:19.960 --> 01:56:23.640] Okay, this is Oregon State and not Fed. [01:56:23.640 --> 01:56:30.040] This is Oregon State Appeals Court, so it's the second highest court before the State [01:56:30.040 --> 01:56:31.040] Court. [01:56:31.040 --> 01:56:35.800] And that depends on the Oregon State law. [01:56:35.800 --> 01:56:45.080] In the Fed, you don't have a ruling until you have both an order and a judgment. [01:56:45.080 --> 01:56:48.600] The judgment is findings of fact, but the state is different. [01:56:48.600 --> 01:56:54.080] So I would suggest petition for a cert. [01:56:54.080 --> 01:57:04.440] Or petition the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus, asking the Supreme Court to order [01:57:04.440 --> 01:57:09.040] the Court of Appeals to provide findings of fact and conclusions of law. [01:57:09.040 --> 01:57:16.000] Because in not giving you that, they've denied you and your right to appeal. [01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:19.840] You can't appeal because you don't know what to appeal. [01:57:19.840 --> 01:57:26.960] An appeal can only be made based on a rule of law. [01:57:26.960 --> 01:57:34.280] You maintain that the court abused this discretion by failing to properly apply the law to the [01:57:34.280 --> 01:57:38.400] facts, but they didn't tell you what they did. [01:57:38.400 --> 01:57:40.360] So they denied you and your right to appeal. [01:57:40.360 --> 01:57:46.040] So petition the Court of the Supreme for a mandamus ordering them to give you findings [01:57:46.040 --> 01:57:47.040] of fact. [01:57:47.040 --> 01:57:54.040] Okay, and should I do this for both my declaratory judgment suit as well as my unemployment suit? [01:57:54.040 --> 01:57:56.040] I think I should. [01:57:56.040 --> 01:57:58.040] Yes, absolutely. [01:57:58.040 --> 01:58:01.040] They have denied you and your right to appeal. [01:58:01.040 --> 01:58:02.040] Okay. [01:58:02.040 --> 01:58:05.040] Because they didn't tell you what to appeal. [01:58:05.040 --> 01:58:08.040] Can I ask a real quick question? [01:58:08.040 --> 01:58:12.040] There are vacancies coming up for the school board. [01:58:12.040 --> 01:58:15.040] What are your thoughts on the Iranians? [01:58:15.040 --> 01:58:18.040] Read that idea. [01:58:18.040 --> 01:58:21.040] Absolutely one. [01:58:21.040 --> 01:58:26.040] We'll advertise on here, but we are out of time. [01:58:26.040 --> 01:58:29.040] Call us back tomorrow night to have more questions. [01:58:29.040 --> 01:58:31.040] We'll have a four-hour show. [01:58:31.040 --> 01:58:32.040] We'll have more time. [01:58:32.040 --> 01:58:33.040] This is Randy Kelton. [01:58:33.040 --> 01:58:36.040] We're at Fountain Rule of the Radio. [01:58:36.040 --> 01:58:38.040] Thank you all for listening. [01:58:38.040 --> 01:58:44.040] We'll be back tomorrow night for our regular four-hour info marathon. [01:58:44.040 --> 01:58:47.040] We're at, say something insightful. [01:58:47.040 --> 01:58:49.040] You've got three seconds. [01:58:49.040 --> 01:58:50.040] Y'all call me? [01:58:50.040 --> 01:58:56.480] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament [01:58:56.480 --> 01:58:57.680] Recovery Version. [01:58:57.680 --> 01:59:02.660] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible [01:59:02.660 --> 01:59:08.320] says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.320 --> 01:59:11.640] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.640 --> 01:59:20.600] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.600 --> 01:59:26.120] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus [01:59:26.120 --> 01:59:30.160] charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.160 --> 01:59:32.680] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.680 --> 01:59:41.080] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.080 --> 01:59:48.080] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.