[00:00.000 --> 00:06.760]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.760 --> 00:13.040]  Markets for Monday 22 July 2019 Open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.040 --> 00:21.440]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.440 --> 00:29.680]  $62.47 a barrel, and crypto is in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.680 --> 00:41.320]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.320 --> 00:52.480]  In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on
[00:52.480 --> 00:58.200]  Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedance Day Parade, killing 10 and
[00:58.200 --> 01:07.360]  entering 40 today in history. In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill
[01:07.360 --> 01:12.560]  1325 legalizing HEP into taxes law back in June, county prosecutors around the state,
[01:12.560 --> 01:16.920]  including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges,
[01:16.920 --> 01:21.040]  and even refusing to file new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time
[01:21.040 --> 01:26.680]  or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District
[01:26.680 --> 01:30.720]  Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and
[01:30.720 --> 01:35.160]  delivery of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials,
[01:35.160 --> 01:39.360]  including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on
[01:39.360 --> 01:44.360]  Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas, and that these actions demonstrate
[01:44.360 --> 01:50.760]  a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities, too, like the district attorney.
[01:50.760 --> 01:56.800]  In El Paso, Kaina Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law
[01:56.800 --> 02:02.760]  quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue
[02:02.760 --> 02:07.560]  was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County,
[02:07.560 --> 02:11.880]  who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based
[02:11.880 --> 02:16.360]  on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test
[02:16.360 --> 02:25.400]  matches with their charge with it. A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half
[02:25.400 --> 02:31.000]  inch American pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being
[02:31.000 --> 02:36.120]  only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way
[02:36.120 --> 02:41.640]  back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the shark secretes a
[02:41.640 --> 02:48.760]  lumeous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey,
[02:48.760 --> 03:16.760]  who may be drawn into the glow.
[03:18.760 --> 03:22.760]  What happens when you call the cops, you get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[03:48.760 --> 04:03.320]  All right folks, good evening. This is rule of law radio with your host Eddie Craig. It is
[04:03.320 --> 04:10.600]  August 30th, 2021. We are live tonight. This is not an archive. In case you were wondering,
[04:10.600 --> 04:15.320]  we would have had a show last week, but we had some hardware difficulties and we're not able to
[04:15.320 --> 04:22.040]  get on the air. So I apologize for that. Tonight, I'm not going to do a heavy monologue, but I'm
[04:22.040 --> 04:26.200]  going to do a monologue. The phones are on, however, if you want to go ahead and get in
[04:26.200 --> 04:38.120]  line so we can talk. Call in number 512-646-1984 and they are on and ready. That said, I've been
[04:38.120 --> 04:47.160]  reading Randy's lawsuit and a motion to dismiss that Randy wrote for some events that occurred
[04:47.160 --> 04:51.960]  against Randy personally and then are very similar to events that occurred to someone
[04:51.960 --> 04:59.000]  else that Randy is helping. Now, this is something that we've talked about before and we've looked
[04:59.000 --> 05:06.200]  at before and the courts have ignored in other ways before. But the crux of Randy's lawsuit
[05:06.200 --> 05:16.920]  is to force the courts of Texas to change the way they do things. And the change is not one that
[05:16.920 --> 05:23.400]  should be unexpected or impossible to perform because the change is actually one where the demand
[05:23.400 --> 05:31.240]  is that the courts and everyone else involved in a prosecution actually follow the law instead
[05:31.240 --> 05:37.400]  of making it up as they go along. Now, that shouldn't be too much to ask of your public
[05:37.400 --> 05:49.960]  servants. No one has a more duty-bound obligation to comply with the law than our public servants
[05:49.960 --> 06:00.920]  and officials do. Of anyone in this country and this state, they have the greatest duty to uphold
[06:00.920 --> 06:09.480]  the law and to comply with it than anyone. Yet they don't do it here in Texas and many other places.
[06:10.760 --> 06:15.640]  They simply make it up as they go for their own convenience and the way it affects the
[06:15.640 --> 06:23.240]  rights of others, the people especially, be damned in the process. Well, his lawsuit is aimed at
[06:23.240 --> 06:31.320]  correcting that. Now, I love Randy to death and he knows his stuff, but his lawsuit needs
[06:31.320 --> 06:35.880]  some work as far as the way it's written, which I'm working on that aspect for him as it goes.
[06:35.880 --> 06:40.680]  We've got to get this thing whittled down from the number of pages it is and the format it's
[06:40.680 --> 06:46.360]  in to a way that it'll actually make sense and the court will pay attention to. But he tried
[06:46.360 --> 06:53.560]  very hard to do the same thing that I do and that is to close up every exit the court could have
[06:53.560 --> 06:59.160]  for saying why they're doing things in violation of law like they have so often done.
[07:01.480 --> 07:05.160]  And in the process of going through his lawsuit and reading this motion,
[07:06.120 --> 07:10.760]  it gave me several ideas, which I incorporated into a rewrite of this motion that he's going to
[07:10.760 --> 07:18.120]  use in this other case. And those, the crux of that motion is what I want to talk to you about
[07:18.120 --> 07:25.480]  tonight because this is something that my speeding dismissal motion already had integrated into it.
[07:26.520 --> 07:35.400]  But it made me decide that I need to break this particular argument out and set it aside and
[07:35.400 --> 07:42.600]  make it its own separate argument. The biggest way to ensure that you have appealable error
[07:43.320 --> 07:51.480]  is to address as many errors of law as exists in your particular case. And believe me,
[07:51.480 --> 07:56.200]  there is not a single case that occurs in the state of Texas. I don't care what the charge is.
[07:57.320 --> 08:04.760]  Anything from a track traffic ticket to first degree murder. There is not a single case in
[08:04.760 --> 08:15.160]  the state of Texas that is done in compliance with law, not one. Every single case violates
[08:15.160 --> 08:21.400]  the rights of the accused from the word go because of how the courts, the cops, and the
[08:21.400 --> 08:31.640]  prosecutors are doing things despite what the law actually says. Now this specific argument goes to
[08:31.640 --> 08:39.240]  the issue of an examining trial. Now anytime you ask for an examining trial in the state of Texas
[08:39.240 --> 08:44.600]  for anything less than a felony, they're going to tell you that you are not entitled to one.
[08:44.600 --> 08:51.240]  You don't have a right to it because the level of your offense is not quote unquote high enough
[08:52.040 --> 08:59.960]  to deserve one. At the same time, even though the statute specifically says that an individual
[08:59.960 --> 09:08.200]  charged with a felony has a right to an examining trial prior to an indictment being sought for
[09:08.200 --> 09:18.440]  their prosecution, the moment a felony arises, the prosecutors and the courts conspire to get
[09:18.440 --> 09:26.200]  an indictment in secret as quickly as possible before the individual who has a statutory right
[09:26.200 --> 09:34.120]  and is being charged with a felony, he has a statutory right to that in examining trial.
[09:34.120 --> 09:37.880]  They're doing their best to do an in-run around the law and prevent it from happening
[09:37.880 --> 09:44.440]  by substituting the indictment for the examining trial. But here's the problem.
[09:47.080 --> 09:55.480]  Without the examining trial at no point in the prosecution is there ever a probable cause
[09:55.480 --> 10:04.440]  determination made by a neutral and detached magistrate. There is no probable cause determination
[10:04.440 --> 10:11.080]  made prior to trial at any time if not by an examining trial. How do we know this?
[10:12.440 --> 10:17.080]  Well one, if you check over the record of any prosecution that's occurred in the state of
[10:17.080 --> 10:26.280]  Texas in the last 30 years or more, you will find that there is no order from an examining court
[10:26.280 --> 10:35.080]  magistrate nor is there any warrant of arrest issued by that same examining court magistrate.
[10:36.360 --> 10:43.480]  These are two things that an examining court magistrate are required by law to complete
[10:43.480 --> 10:52.440]  once an examining trial has been concluded. Okay? The exception out of those two instruments
[10:52.440 --> 11:00.360]  is the arrest warrant. The arrest warrant must be done if a finding of probable cause is made.
[11:01.240 --> 11:09.720]  An arrest warrant cannot be done if there is no finding of probable cause for the alleged defense
[11:09.720 --> 11:16.440]  and the warrantless seizure and arrest of the person that is being accused. Okay? Because let's
[11:16.440 --> 11:26.120]  remember the charge is invalid if the arrest is invalid. If the arrest that occurred prior to the
[11:26.120 --> 11:32.840]  charge was not valid then everything else that comes after it is fruit of the poison tree. So it's
[11:32.840 --> 11:41.800]  dead in the water from the get-go. That's just the way it works. So if the officer had no probable
[11:41.800 --> 11:48.440]  cause to make the warrantless arrest in the first place everything else is swept aside as fruit
[11:48.440 --> 11:57.080]  of the poison tree. So that's why an examining court when it comes to a warrantless arrest
[11:57.080 --> 12:04.440]  must make two different probable cause determinations. Was the arrest without warrant valid and was
[12:04.440 --> 12:11.320]  there probable cause for it? And is there probable cause to believe that the person
[12:11.320 --> 12:15.960]  that was arrested is actually the person that committed the offense they're accused of?
[12:17.480 --> 12:24.280]  If those both hold true then the magistrate is required by law to write an order of commitment
[12:24.280 --> 12:32.920]  either remanding the person to jail or setting them out on bond and a warrant for their arrest.
[12:33.960 --> 12:40.440]  Okay? Which means they are taken into custody prior to be putting it into that jail cell
[12:40.440 --> 12:48.680]  and held or being released on that bond. Okay? That's the way the law is written.
[12:48.680 --> 12:58.280]  So what they're doing by denying anyone including those accused of misdemeanors
[12:59.720 --> 13:06.440]  in the having of an examining trial they are denying them in their right to a probable
[13:06.440 --> 13:13.000]  cause determination both on the warrantless arrest and on the alleged offense.
[13:13.000 --> 13:21.560]  Okay? That's a violation of due process. And there's tons of case law that says that's the case.
[13:23.320 --> 13:28.280]  An improper probable cause determination deprives the trial court of jurisdiction.
[13:29.480 --> 13:35.000]  Well here in Texas the trial courts obtained their jurisdiction
[13:35.000 --> 13:44.680]  from the forwarding of that finding of probable cause from the examining court.
[13:46.920 --> 13:51.160]  The law specifically directs the magistrate of the examining court upon conclusion
[13:51.160 --> 13:57.240]  to seal up all the records that were had in that examining trial into an envelope
[13:57.240 --> 14:02.600]  and forward it to the court of jurisdiction. Of jurisdiction in this case means the court
[14:02.600 --> 14:11.320]  having jurisdiction to try the offense the person is accused of. Okay? It is at that point
[14:11.320 --> 14:18.360]  and only at that point that that court can seek an indictment for the crime.
[14:19.960 --> 14:23.800]  Nowhere is the grand jury given the power to seek an indictment
[14:23.800 --> 14:33.240]  upon a criminal complaint alone. Okay? Even if they have someone in the grand jury
[14:33.240 --> 14:36.440]  that is aware of a crime and brings it to the grand jury's attention
[14:36.440 --> 14:41.080]  they still have to do it through the same procedure. They have to file a complaint.
[14:41.080 --> 14:46.520]  The complaint has to be taken before someone that's authorized by law to administer an oath
[14:46.520 --> 14:52.120]  which is the county or district attorney who is then required by law to write up an information
[14:52.120 --> 14:58.520]  and then they are to take that information and that complaint to a magistrate not to a judge
[14:58.520 --> 15:07.320]  not to a grand jury to a magistrate. Why? Because the magistrate is the one directed by law to
[15:07.320 --> 15:16.920]  perform the examining trial. Not a judge, not a prosecutor, not a clerk of the court. A magistrate
[15:16.920 --> 15:23.240]  that is authorized by law to conduct an examining trial is who every criminal complaint and charging
[15:23.240 --> 15:30.200]  instrument in the state of Texas is directed to. Once the examining court concludes its hearing
[15:30.840 --> 15:38.600]  and makes its findings the order either with or without probable cause is signed and put into
[15:38.600 --> 15:43.640]  those sealed that sealed envelope with all the other records. If there is a finding of probable
[15:43.640 --> 15:51.320]  cause those records include a warrant of arrest. Okay? It then gets forwarded to the trial court
[15:51.320 --> 15:56.600]  who executes the warrant for arrest if the magistrate in the examining court does not turn
[15:56.600 --> 16:00.520]  it over to a law enforcement over to do at that time which he is empowered to do
[16:03.480 --> 16:09.720]  and the warrant gets executed. The person is taken into custody and either held in jail
[16:09.720 --> 16:19.160]  or released on bond according to the warrant. Okay? Even if the person is arrested on a warrant
[16:20.200 --> 16:26.200]  and the warrant was not issued from an examining court magistrate
[16:27.800 --> 16:32.760]  then the process still applies. The person arrested on the warrant is required to be
[16:32.760 --> 16:39.160]  brought before a magistrate for probable cause determination. Okay? This time it doesn't have
[16:39.160 --> 16:43.960]  to be on the legality of the arrest because the arrest was performed with a warrant but it still
[16:43.960 --> 16:49.240]  has to be done in relation to the allegation that allowed the warrant to be issued. All right.
[16:49.240 --> 16:52.680]  Y'all hang on just a second. We're going to take a quick break and I'll be right back on the other
[16:52.680 --> 16:58.680]  side. 512-646-1984 is the calling number. Give us a call. Get in line. We'll be right back.
[17:00.360 --> 17:06.280]  Through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.280 --> 17:11.080]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.080 --> 17:17.400]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.400 --> 17:22.120]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[17:22.120 --> 17:28.360]  young Jeviti can provide the nutrients you need. Logo's radio network gets many requests to endorse
[17:28.360 --> 17:34.920]  all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jeviti so much. We became a
[17:34.920 --> 17:40.840]  marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. When you order from
[17:40.840 --> 17:48.200]  LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. As you realize
[17:48.200 --> 17:54.360]  the benefits of young Jeviti, you may want to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved
[17:54.360 --> 17:59.640]  health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[17:59.640 --> 18:06.200]  Are you wondering what this world is coming to and why God isn't stopping it? Then tune in to
[18:06.200 --> 18:11.960]  LogosRadioNetwork.com on Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time for Scripture Talk,
[18:11.960 --> 18:17.560]  where Nana and guests study God's Word to find these answers and more. Join us for both verse
[18:17.560 --> 18:23.720]  by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to explain God's plan as well as to provoke
[18:23.720 --> 18:30.040]  unto love and good works. Our first-hour studies are in the book of Matthew. Our second-hour topics
[18:30.040 --> 18:36.120]  vary each week, exploring sound doctrine as well as Christian character development. Our goal is
[18:36.120 --> 18:42.200]  in accord with Matthew 5.16. Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works
[18:42.200 --> 18:47.880]  and glorify your Father which is in heaven. We wish to reflect God's light and to be a blessing
[18:47.880 --> 18:54.040]  to all those who have a hearing year. So tune into Scripture Talk live on LogosRadioNetwork.com
[18:54.040 --> 19:20.040]  Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. for an inspiring and motivating study of the Scriptures.
[19:24.920 --> 19:31.800]  Folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. Call in number 512-646-1984.
[19:32.840 --> 19:37.080]  Chris and Stephen, I see you on the board there. Let me finish this little get-through
[19:37.080 --> 19:40.840]  here and then I'll start taking calls either at the bottom of this segment or at the top of the
[19:40.840 --> 19:49.800]  next one. Okay, now again, since the trial court's jurisdiction flows only from the completion of
[19:49.800 --> 19:58.040]  the examining trial and the finding of probable cause by that magistrate, the trial court cannot
[19:58.040 --> 20:07.160]  simply take up a case, declare jurisdiction, and pursue a prosecution. This is exactly what these
[20:07.160 --> 20:14.680]  courts are doing, however. The trial court is assuming a jurisdiction it cannot legally have
[20:14.680 --> 20:21.400]  under the law as it is written in the state of Texas. The trial court is attempting to acquire
[20:21.400 --> 20:29.560]  jurisdiction by fiat by declaring a due process right that of a probable cause determination
[20:29.560 --> 20:36.840]  by a neutral magistrate as something that is optional to the right of due process that doesn't
[20:36.840 --> 20:43.880]  have to be done in the state of Texas unless it's a felony. And even then, it doesn't have to be done
[20:43.880 --> 20:50.680]  if we can get an indictment before you have a chance to get it. So in other words, nobody in
[20:50.680 --> 20:56.440]  Texas is entitled to a proper probable cause determination according to the courts, the
[20:56.440 --> 21:03.480]  prosecutors, and the cops. So here's how this criminal conspiracy and this criminal street
[21:03.480 --> 21:13.480]  gang is actually operating. The cops are arresting people without warrant. By law, a warrantless arrest
[21:13.480 --> 21:20.120]  is considered invalid once it's challenged. Once an invalid arrest or an arrest has been
[21:20.120 --> 21:26.680]  challenged as invalid, the court must make a finding a probable cause for the arrest.
[21:26.680 --> 21:32.600]  They're not doing that. They're simply assuming it. Well, you were charged with a crime, weren't you?
[21:32.600 --> 21:38.920]  You were arrested and put in jail, weren't you? Therefore, that's all we need to assume jurisdiction.
[21:38.920 --> 21:47.880]  No, it's not. It absolutely is not. And there's a ton of case law on that. An allegation of
[21:47.880 --> 21:56.040]  a crime is not evidence of a crime. It is not proper authority to persecute for a crime unless
[21:56.040 --> 22:04.680]  there's something supporting it, such as a finding a probable cause, which isn't being done.
[22:04.680 --> 22:14.840]  So the cops are refusing to take the people they arrest without warrant before a magistrate,
[22:14.840 --> 22:21.800]  which in the state of Texas is something they are commanded to do. By law, in the state of Texas,
[22:21.800 --> 22:28.360]  the moment you are placed under arrest by an officer, he has a statutorily mandated legal
[22:28.360 --> 22:36.840]  duty to take you before the nearest available magistrate. And because the magistration appearance
[22:36.840 --> 22:44.280]  can be done electronically, they are not limited by time and place. They can take you to the nearest
[22:44.280 --> 22:49.800]  place where an electronic connection is available and hook you up with any magistrate within the
[22:49.800 --> 22:59.320]  entire state of Texas within half an hour tops. At the most, there's a way to get you in front of
[22:59.320 --> 23:10.040]  some magistrate somewhere ASAP. They just don't do it. In fact, under current policy implemented
[23:10.040 --> 23:17.240]  by their superiors, they don't even attempt to do it. The policy is arrest them and take them to
[23:17.240 --> 23:25.000]  jail, humiliate them, punish them by booking them, fingerprinting them, and lock them in a jail cell
[23:25.000 --> 23:33.880]  to show them who's boss. We'll work everything else out later. Nowhere are cops given that authority.
[23:34.600 --> 23:41.800]  In fact, there is also tons of case law that says they absolutely do not and cannot have that authority.
[23:41.800 --> 23:49.320]  It's a conflict of interest. It's a violation of due process. It is the entire reason why they are
[23:49.320 --> 23:56.120]  ordered by the law to take the person arrested before a magistrate, including a person arrested
[23:56.120 --> 24:04.360]  on a warrant. Unless the warrant they're arrested under issued from an examining court, because then
[24:04.360 --> 24:09.240]  the probable cause determination has already been made in order for the warrant to have been issued.
[24:09.240 --> 24:15.720]  But if a warrant is issued simply based upon an allegation and no probable cause related to that
[24:15.720 --> 24:21.720]  allegation has been had, then just like a person arrested without a warrant, the law dictates that
[24:21.720 --> 24:30.360]  that officer is required to deliver that individual immediately before a magistrate, with the only
[24:30.360 --> 24:36.280]  exception being a strenuating circumstances such as a natural disaster or something else that would
[24:36.280 --> 24:42.520]  or something else that would have prevented the officer from performing that mandatory legal duty.
[24:42.520 --> 24:48.280]  It's not a discretionary duty. It's not optional. They are required by law to do it and they are
[24:48.280 --> 24:57.560]  not doing it. Their departments are sanctioning this. The prosecution is sanctioning this because
[24:57.560 --> 25:03.800]  they don't immediately drop the prosecution by admitting that the person was unlawfully arrested
[25:03.800 --> 25:11.960]  in hell, which they were. The moment an officer throws you in jail without looking for a magistrate
[25:11.960 --> 25:18.200]  to make a probable cause determination so that you can validly be committed to that jail with an
[25:18.200 --> 25:23.480]  actual finding of probable cause in the proper order in the arrest warrant, that officer has broken
[25:23.480 --> 25:28.680]  the law. The moment he breaks that law, he is guilty of official misconduct. It even says that
[25:28.680 --> 25:34.680]  right in the Texas Transportation Code under Chapter 543, it says that if an officer violates
[25:34.680 --> 25:44.360]  any provision of 543.007 or 010, then that officer is guilty of misconduct in office.
[25:44.360 --> 25:53.000]  One of those is taking before a magistrate. Now, the problem here is that's not the only
[25:53.000 --> 25:57.240]  place they're ordered to do it. They're ordered to do it in the Code of Criminal Procedure as well
[25:57.240 --> 26:04.200]  and they don't. That means regardless of what the regulatory statute itself may say,
[26:04.760 --> 26:09.240]  if they make a warrantless arrest, the Code of Criminal Procedure requires them to take you
[26:09.240 --> 26:16.760]  before a magistrate as soon as absolutely possible. There it will brook no unnecessary delay. That's
[26:16.760 --> 26:23.880]  what the case law on it says. No unnecessary delay. Well, an officer choosing not to do it,
[26:23.880 --> 26:31.400]  refusing to do it, or having a policy directing him not to do it, does not facilitate a necessary
[26:31.400 --> 26:37.880]  delay. It does not facilitate a state of emergency. It does not facilitate a valid reason
[26:37.880 --> 26:42.120]  to fail to perform the duty he's required to perform under law.
[26:44.120 --> 26:50.280]  Because this is not being done, the proper order is not being done. And because the proper order
[26:50.280 --> 26:56.040]  is not being done, it cannot be forwarded to the court of competent jurisdiction, the trial court.
[26:56.040 --> 27:03.240]  Therefore, the trial court cannot possibly acquire subject matter jurisdiction over the offense
[27:03.240 --> 27:08.600]  because there's never been a finding a probable cause for it. Now, let's play this out in a scenario.
[27:10.200 --> 27:14.280]  You get pulled over by a cop on the side of the highway and issued a traffic ticket.
[27:14.280 --> 27:20.440]  Even something as simple as a traffic ticket. In the state of Texas, every traffic stop is an
[27:20.440 --> 27:27.640]  arrest. The transportation code makes that very, very clear. It is an arrest. It's made without warrant,
[27:28.360 --> 27:37.640]  okay? And they arrest you for things that are not even allowed to be off by that law to be arrested
[27:37.640 --> 27:48.520]  for. But they do it. So even if they release you, okay, there still has to be something performed
[27:48.520 --> 27:54.520]  at a registration in the form or not a registration, I'm sorry, in the form of an examining trial
[27:55.720 --> 27:59.560]  in order to find probable cause for that detention on the side of the road
[27:59.560 --> 28:04.120]  and for the allegation that was being made against you. There has to be something done
[28:04.120 --> 28:10.760]  to make the order finding probable cause for both of those things. And it's not. Now under
[28:10.760 --> 28:18.120]  Texas law, if there is no order issued within 48 hours of the conclusion of the examining trial,
[28:18.120 --> 28:25.880]  then that acts as a finding of no probable cause. So if a judge of an examining court does not create
[28:25.880 --> 28:31.320]  an order and forward it to the court of jurisdiction within 48 hours of conducting the examining trial
[28:31.320 --> 28:39.720]  as an operation of law, it is a finding of no probable cause. But there's never an opportunity
[28:39.720 --> 28:45.480]  for a magistrate to find probable cause because the officers are taking you directly to jail
[28:46.840 --> 28:56.120]  and denying you in that right. That denial of the right is precisely what results in a no finding
[28:56.120 --> 29:02.520]  of probable cause and a lack of jurisdiction, subject matter and personal in relation to the
[29:02.520 --> 29:09.000]  trial court. But what they're doing is that they're taking that citation, they're sending it to the
[29:09.000 --> 29:15.480]  court, the clerk of the court themselves is writing up a criminal complaint and handing that
[29:15.480 --> 29:22.440]  complaint off to the court that's trying the case without an examining trial. Thus no probable cause
[29:22.440 --> 29:28.600]  finding by a separate and detached magistrate because the clerk of the court is not and cannot be
[29:28.600 --> 29:35.160]  a valid magistrate. The trial courts never properly acquired jurisdiction in any case
[29:35.160 --> 29:41.640]  they're hearing and it works the exact same way in a murder case. They pick the guy up on a warrant,
[29:41.640 --> 29:47.240]  he's never taken for an examining trial, they throw him in jail and they hold him there until
[29:47.240 --> 29:53.880]  they're ready for trial or he cuts the plea deal. But there's never an examining trial for the order
[29:53.880 --> 29:57.160]  to be made. Y'all hang on, we'll be right back after the break.
[30:02.760 --> 30:08.760]  Oh Mr. Sun, Sun, Mr. Golden Sun, won't you please shine down on me?
[30:09.720 --> 30:13.720]  I've got Dr. Catherine Albrecht and in just a moment I'll be back to tell you why we should
[30:13.720 --> 30:19.880]  celebrate the Sun for a few minutes every day. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data
[30:19.880 --> 30:25.480]  about yourself you'll never get it back again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms
[30:25.480 --> 30:31.320]  will start to vanish too. So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information
[30:31.320 --> 30:36.680]  to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to
[30:36.680 --> 30:44.440]  you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.040 --> 30:51.160]  Feeling tired, sick or blue? A bit of sun exposure can make you feel like a million bucks and it
[30:51.160 --> 30:55.800]  won't cost you a dime. Ten or fifteen minutes in the sun without sunscreen helps your body
[30:55.800 --> 31:01.400]  produce its daily vitamin D requirement. Vitamin D may prevent type 1 diabetes and decrease your
[31:01.400 --> 31:06.680]  risk of breast, colon and prostate cancer. The sun can also help you get more z's by stimulating
[31:06.680 --> 31:11.160]  production of melanin, the hormone that promotes better sleep. And when you're out of sorts,
[31:11.160 --> 31:15.560]  the sun can boost your body's production of endorphins and serotonin, the brain chemicals
[31:15.560 --> 31:20.680]  that lift your mood. So be sure to make every day a Sunday. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[31:20.680 --> 31:34.520]  more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper
[31:34.520 --> 31:38.680]  that fell on the afternoon of September 11. The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.680 --> 31:44.040]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over
[31:44.040 --> 31:48.280]  6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow first
[31:48.280 --> 31:51.960]  responders have died. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a
[31:51.960 --> 31:55.880]  New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We
[31:55.880 --> 32:01.080]  are Americans, and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:02.920 --> 32:06.920]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America,
[32:06.920 --> 32:10.280]  we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free
[32:10.280 --> 32:14.440]  society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are
[32:14.440 --> 32:18.360]  the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most
[32:18.360 --> 32:22.600]  importantly, the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive
[32:22.600 --> 32:27.000]  opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's
[32:27.000 --> 32:31.000]  Deputy Kay Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive
[32:31.000 --> 32:34.840]  teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold
[32:34.840 --> 32:38.680]  courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this valuable material by going to
[32:38.680 --> 32:43.320]  ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's
[32:43.320 --> 32:47.320]  book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original
[32:47.320 --> 32:51.800]  2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how
[32:51.800 --> 32:55.800]  to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your
[32:55.800 --> 32:59.400]  copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.400 --> 33:11.400]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:29.400 --> 33:56.360]  All right folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[33:56.360 --> 34:02.440]  All right. Now, just real quick, I'm going to wrap this up. So where I'm going with this is this.
[34:02.440 --> 34:06.920]  One of the new motions in the seminar material is going to be a motion to dismiss for lack of
[34:06.920 --> 34:11.080]  subject matter jurisdiction because of the denial of the right of the finding of probable cause.
[34:11.720 --> 34:18.680]  Thus, the trial court lacks jurisdiction in all cases. All right. So once this motion is complete,
[34:18.680 --> 34:23.880]  I get it all hashed out. It will be available in the new updated seminar material. It's not
[34:23.880 --> 34:27.480]  going to be updated into the old version. It's going to be put entirely in the new version.
[34:28.920 --> 34:33.880]  Though there's going to be a lot more detail and a lot more significant stuff in the new version
[34:33.880 --> 34:39.560]  of the seminar material and the book, it'll be a lot more complete, a lot more detailed and a lot
[34:39.560 --> 34:46.840]  more well linked so that it's much easier to follow and understand. Hopefully I'll do my best,
[34:46.840 --> 34:56.600]  I promise. But once I finally get this done, which I am working on, we'll figure out everything
[34:56.600 --> 35:00.680]  about it as far as what's going to cost and everything else. Hopefully I'll be able to cut
[35:00.680 --> 35:06.840]  down on the number of documents we have to produce in relation to this. I'm also in the process of
[35:06.840 --> 35:12.760]  trying to write a master document template that allows you to fill in specific details about a
[35:12.760 --> 35:18.440]  particular case and then it will generate the necessary documents. It's kind of like Randy's
[35:18.440 --> 35:25.560]  idea, except mine is local to your computer and it uses macro-enabled documents to generate
[35:25.560 --> 35:32.280]  everything that you need for a particular case and offense. But that takes a little bit of time
[35:32.280 --> 35:37.800]  to get done as well because it's a coding issue there. You've got to sit down, write the document,
[35:37.800 --> 35:41.400]  test the document, blah, blah, blah, blah, and I've got to make sure that the complete list
[35:41.400 --> 35:46.040]  of documents that I need for any given type of offense is there and the decision-making
[35:46.040 --> 35:51.000]  tree on how to generate that list of documents is also complete and whole and all that good stuff.
[35:51.800 --> 36:01.720]  The other problem I have is I'm writing this in Word, which uses VBA, which should transfer over
[36:01.720 --> 36:08.120]  into OpenOffice and LibreOffice, both of which are free. Depending upon how complicated I make
[36:08.120 --> 36:15.400]  the macros and how complicated I make them will depend entirely upon how well simple
[36:15.400 --> 36:20.440]  instructions function to get the job done over complicated instructions. If there are functions
[36:20.440 --> 36:26.200]  that VBA in Word supports that it doesn't support under LibreOffice or OpenOffice, the document will
[36:26.200 --> 36:31.640]  not function as intended, which means everything has to be done manually as far as editing and
[36:31.640 --> 36:38.440]  compiling the documents you need. It's also a test, not only do I have to write it, but then I've
[36:38.440 --> 36:43.000]  got to test it under these other two platforms to see if it functions under both of them,
[36:43.000 --> 36:49.240]  one of them or none of them. That, again, is all part of the process of getting this done.
[36:49.240 --> 36:54.920]  It's not just as simple as writing it and saying, here you go. Not if I want it to work right for
[36:54.920 --> 37:01.400]  you. Given that, that's one of the reasons why this is taking so long. Everything changes,
[37:01.400 --> 37:07.240]  the law, the actual underlying law itself doesn't change but the verbiage of the statutes that are
[37:07.240 --> 37:14.360]  used to interpret it do. So every time one of those changes comes along, I've got to go back
[37:14.360 --> 37:20.760]  and update other things to catch up with it. So please bear with me. All right, that said,
[37:20.760 --> 37:26.520]  let's start up the callers. Again, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number. If you want to call,
[37:26.520 --> 37:33.160]  ask a question, talk about a case, whatever. All right, that said, first up is Chris in Colorado.
[37:33.160 --> 37:40.120]  Chris, what do you got? Hey, Eddie. Edith. Hey, glad to hear you on tonight.
[37:42.280 --> 37:50.040]  So bear with me. I'm a little slow. I got in a car accident on the 5th and this guy hit us
[37:50.040 --> 37:56.920]  from the side. He went over 60 miles an hour. So my bell's still running pretty good but just a
[37:56.920 --> 38:04.360]  little slow. All right, a couple questions about that in this situation. One, and I just wanted
[38:04.360 --> 38:09.720]  to keep kind of hot in my mind. When we got to the hospital, actually, I didn't take the ambulance
[38:09.720 --> 38:15.960]  because I was still pumped on adrenaline. I was still functioning. But we went down there later
[38:15.960 --> 38:21.240]  that about an hour later. The family gave us a drive down and we get to the emergency room and I
[38:21.240 --> 38:26.040]  said, I'm having problem with breathing and just in a car accident. I mean, it was. I got knocked
[38:26.040 --> 38:31.560]  out and I was having a hard time breathing. They wouldn't let me in. What do you mean they wouldn't
[38:31.560 --> 38:38.600]  let you in? They refused service for me not putting on a mask. Okay. And I told them, I said,
[38:38.600 --> 38:42.520]  I have a medical emergency and I'm having a hard time breathing. I'm not going to put that thing
[38:42.520 --> 38:48.040]  on. And it just went back and forth a little bit and then they brought out a head nurse. I asked
[38:48.040 --> 38:52.200]  for a head nurse and then they brought out security and then they brought out the manager
[38:52.200 --> 38:57.160]  and they all stood there and ended hot and did all that crap. Anyway, filmed it all.
[38:58.200 --> 39:05.800]  Just curious what you thought right there. Well, I think you probably have a potential lawsuit on
[39:05.800 --> 39:10.360]  if you can show that their failure to provide the service was detrimental to your health and harmed
[39:10.360 --> 39:15.320]  you in some way. Now, the question here is, was this a private hospital or was it a county hospital?
[39:16.520 --> 39:21.080]  It's a county hospital, but you know, they're all private technically, but they aren't the only
[39:21.080 --> 39:26.920]  licensed in the hospital in the area. No, that's not true. A county hospital is paid for by public
[39:26.920 --> 39:33.560]  funds. They cannot turn away somebody that's in a state of distress. By law, they can't do it.
[39:33.560 --> 39:39.320]  So that's why you've got to make sure we're actually talking about a county funded hospital.
[39:41.160 --> 39:45.320]  Good point. That's one thing I've been trying to figure out the wordage for and that's exactly
[39:45.320 --> 39:52.360]  what I need to ask. Yeah, okay. I spoke to an MD last week. I finally got to see a doctor
[39:53.320 --> 39:57.240]  and bounced around all over the place not knowing where to go, but she actually said,
[39:57.240 --> 40:04.120]  I don't think they can deny you service. No, they cannot if it's a county funded hospital.
[40:04.120 --> 40:09.400]  That's what I'm saying. Public funds paid for that hospital. If you're in distress,
[40:09.400 --> 40:13.400]  they're required to provide service. Now, they're only required to provide service up to the point
[40:13.400 --> 40:18.440]  of stabilizing you, but without doing any sort of examination of any kind of just denying you
[40:18.440 --> 40:23.240]  service up front, they made no effort to determine whether or not you required stabilization.
[40:23.240 --> 40:29.560]  Exactly. Thus, they endangered your health and life by not doing their job and doing that.
[40:31.800 --> 40:36.760]  Now, that's the common sense way of thinking about it. Whether or not the law will actually
[40:36.760 --> 40:45.480]  help you or not, that's a whole other matter. But if I were you, I would try to find someone
[40:45.480 --> 40:49.800]  that's not a shyster personal injury attorney and see what they can do for you.
[40:49.800 --> 40:57.640]  Thank you for segwaying into one of my next questions. I actually found some cool stuff
[40:57.640 --> 41:05.080]  recently on the actual, not the oath, but there's an act. There's a legal federal act that requires
[41:05.080 --> 41:10.120]  hospitals to act in a certain manner, which you just said they have to make an assessment before
[41:10.120 --> 41:14.920]  they can determine that you say they can deny you service. They didn't do any of that. So,
[41:14.920 --> 41:17.640]  they've actually violated that act, but I do need to find out.
[41:17.640 --> 41:23.720]  Okay. Now, here's the thing. If they did, if you have a state law act that goes along with
[41:23.720 --> 41:28.360]  that and says the same thing, you can actually sue them twice. Once in state court, once in federal
[41:28.360 --> 41:36.840]  court. Okay. Being that word, if they're the only hospital ready in Cheyenne, they are the only one.
[41:36.840 --> 41:41.080]  There's some small satellite clinics, you know, some private stuff, but they're the only emergency
[41:41.080 --> 41:48.280]  room in Cheyenne. So, then there's a distinct possibility that they are publicly funded in
[41:48.280 --> 41:54.280]  some way, shape, or form and that they're, they're hosed, but you got to make the fight for it.
[41:54.920 --> 41:59.000]  And if you don't know how to do that, then the best thing I can tell you is find,
[42:00.680 --> 42:08.360]  find a personal injury attorney. Okay. But don't use a shyster one. Find one that gets real results,
[42:08.360 --> 42:12.920]  not that jumps on TV and says, look at these settlements because that's BS. Okay.
[42:12.920 --> 42:19.800]  No, I understand. I understand. Speaking of lawyers, though, I actually, I called many,
[42:19.800 --> 42:24.360]  many lawyers within the first week just seeing who's up to squat for whatever. And I,
[42:24.920 --> 42:30.280]  I got this older guy in the 70s and he seemed a little slow on the phone, but I eventually went
[42:30.280 --> 42:35.800]  and saw him. I like him. He's not asking me to hire him. He's just saying, go get medical help.
[42:35.800 --> 42:38.600]  Let me know when you get all this done and then we'll talk some more. He says,
[42:38.600 --> 42:42.840]  legal stuff, you don't need to worry about right now. But my question is,
[42:42.840 --> 42:45.800]  is yeah, I'm going to need a attorney for this, right? I'm both sides actually.
[42:46.600 --> 42:50.920]  I can, you know, it's entirely possible if you don't know how to do it.
[42:50.920 --> 42:53.320]  That's, that's your only real option to get it done.
[42:54.440 --> 43:03.320]  Yeah. Yeah. So to answer your question about, well, you said go find somebody for the hospital
[43:03.320 --> 43:07.240]  side. I called a few people within a few days too and brought this to their attention. They
[43:07.240 --> 43:10.280]  all said, now you got no claim against them. You got no claim against them. So I probably
[43:10.280 --> 43:17.160]  found a bunch of powers. I've had a long few years with that, with my towing incident in
[43:17.160 --> 43:24.680]  Chicago, talking like they know and they don't. That's almost always every attorney,
[43:24.680 --> 43:29.960]  which is why I don't recommend attorneys in general. And I don't recommend specific attorneys ever.
[43:29.960 --> 43:37.000]  Well, I might be able to do this on my own when I get my wicks back, but not right now.
[43:37.960 --> 43:41.080]  Okay. Well, hang on just a second. Let me take this break and we'll finish up with you on the
[43:41.080 --> 43:50.040]  other side. Okay. Okay. All right, folks, call in number 512-646-1984. Please give us a call,
[43:50.040 --> 43:54.200]  get in line, ask a question, whatever you feel like you might want to do. And we will be right
[43:54.200 --> 44:03.080]  back after this break. So y'all hang on. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.640 --> 44:09.960]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD
[44:09.960 --> 44:17.000]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, death by steps. If you have a lawyer, know what your
[44:17.000 --> 44:21.880]  lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:21.880 --> 44:29.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[44:29.000 --> 44:35.880]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[44:35.880 --> 44:41.240]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[44:41.240 --> 44:47.960]  our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for
[44:47.960 --> 44:55.880]  civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[44:55.880 --> 45:03.960]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be
[45:03.960 --> 45:08.280]  almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[45:08.280 --> 45:13.720]  I need my truth pick. I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on
[45:13.720 --> 45:18.120]  the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't have
[45:18.120 --> 45:24.120]  any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad
[45:24.120 --> 45:28.680]  you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your
[45:28.680 --> 45:35.640]  supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[45:35.640 --> 45:40.760]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon,
[45:40.760 --> 45:46.840]  you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything
[45:46.840 --> 45:53.560]  different when I order? No. Can I use my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving without doing
[45:53.560 --> 46:11.240]  anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much. We are Logos. Happy Holidays, Logos.
[46:24.280 --> 46:43.080]  All right, folks. We are back. This is Rue LeBlanc Radio. Call it number 512-646-1984.
[46:43.080 --> 46:47.320]  We are currently talking with Chris in Colorado. All right, Chris, please continue.
[46:47.320 --> 46:55.880]  Okay. The other thing that happened on the accident, the trooper that was writing your
[46:55.880 --> 46:59.480]  report, he asked for my name. He asked for my data bar. I didn't have my ID on me because I
[46:59.480 --> 47:05.000]  wasn't driving. He said, I didn't have my license with me. So, I showed him my credit card and I'm
[47:05.000 --> 47:09.080]  like, you know, here's my name and the other person vouched for me, right? And he says,
[47:09.080 --> 47:13.560]  I can't find you in the system. I'm like, it doesn't matter. That's my name. I write it on
[47:13.560 --> 47:18.200]  the report. He says, I can't put you on the report. He's basically threatening me. He says,
[47:18.200 --> 47:24.680]  if you want to be on the report, I need to identify you. And I said, I'll call you tomorrow with the
[47:24.680 --> 47:28.920]  license. He says, well, I don't know if I can get, I mean, like he was being a total jerk at that
[47:28.920 --> 47:35.240]  time. Oh, yeah. Who was this? This was the trooper who first showed up with the accidents too.
[47:35.240 --> 47:43.160]  Okay. All right. And I talked to the sheriff's office later on and they said, that's complete
[47:43.160 --> 47:47.480]  junk. You can't say that or do that. You know, we don't have to have an ID to identify you. We
[47:47.480 --> 47:52.520]  put you in the report. So, then I called him the next day and I talked to him and I wasn't in the
[47:52.520 --> 47:57.960]  mood to fight. And I just talked to him and I said, do you need me to bring the ID down? He says,
[47:57.960 --> 48:01.080]  well, I got you in there. But then he told me, he says, I'm going to put in the report that
[48:01.080 --> 48:07.800]  no 50 of the states or anywhere in any database can I identify you? And that's what he's going to
[48:07.800 --> 48:12.200]  put in the police report. I haven't got a copy of the digital, but I got a copy of the hard copy
[48:12.760 --> 48:17.800]  and just having my name on it. I don't know what to do about that. That's going to cause problems.
[48:17.800 --> 48:22.600]  But that just doesn't seem, first of all, it doesn't seem right. You can even do that because
[48:22.600 --> 48:27.400]  you're not required to show an ID anywhere unless there's a crime, right? And then second, well,
[48:27.400 --> 48:33.560]  you're not, you're never, no state of the union requires a presentation of a physical form of ID,
[48:33.560 --> 48:41.000]  none. Okay. When an officer says to identify yourself and you are legally obligated to do so,
[48:41.000 --> 48:49.640]  you may do so 100% of the time verbally. Okay. Nothing in law directs you to provide them with
[48:49.640 --> 48:57.720]  a physical form of identification ever. Right. And that challenge that I haven't done in Wyoming,
[48:57.720 --> 49:03.640]  but I certainly can judge for that in Colorado. Should I bring this to a supervisor? Should I
[49:03.640 --> 49:08.120]  waste my energy? Should I make a situation out of this one? Well, you can always file a complaint
[49:08.120 --> 49:11.720]  against him. It really just depends on whether or not you're trying to teach him something or
[49:11.720 --> 49:15.720]  whether or not you're just, you know, trying to make sure he understands what his job is.
[49:15.720 --> 49:20.760]  Just be aware if you run into him at a future date, he may take it personally and retaliate.
[49:22.040 --> 49:26.600]  Well, yeah, then that would, that would backfire on him twice. I guarantee you that.
[49:27.400 --> 49:32.040]  Only if you could prove that what he was doing was retaliation, which again,
[49:32.040 --> 49:35.800]  this goes back to making sure you're recording everything when you encounter these guys.
[49:36.680 --> 49:44.440]  I do. I always do. Okay. It's more along teaching. This has been such a chaotic town. There's so
[49:44.440 --> 49:48.760]  much incompetence in this town. I mean, it's a small town. There's 60,000 people from military
[49:48.760 --> 49:52.920]  towns. This guy didn't know what he's talking about. The sheriffs are awesome here. I've
[49:52.920 --> 49:55.800]  run into the sheriff, talked to him a couple of times. The sheriffs are pretty cool here, actually.
[49:57.160 --> 50:00.840]  But these guys, they didn't know what they're talking about. The hospital was a joke.
[50:01.400 --> 50:06.840]  Some of the medical staff here, the doctors in town, it's kind of a joke. They just have a casual
[50:06.840 --> 50:11.640]  attitude for it. So I would like to teach them so they can do people justice and do a good job,
[50:11.640 --> 50:17.000]  you know? And plus they took two damn weeks to get the damn report done. So we couldn't even
[50:17.000 --> 50:21.960]  get insurance help or get to the doctors because he was hanging on that all the time. So I just
[50:21.960 --> 50:31.480]  don't know how these things work. And I'd like to clean it out if I can. Yeah. Okay.
[50:31.480 --> 50:40.680]  I'll probably file a complaint. That call is entirely up to you as to how you go about it.
[50:42.120 --> 50:46.680]  If it were me and he had done something that I knew he wasn't supposed to be doing and been a
[50:48.120 --> 50:54.280]  head about it, you know, then he most certainly would get a complaint. Nope, though if answer,
[50:54.280 --> 50:59.640]  but he would have gotten a complaint. So just, you know, pick and choose whether or not you feel
[50:59.640 --> 51:04.840]  he deserves one. And if he does, give it to him. I'll talk to the supervisor and we'll
[51:04.840 --> 51:08.920]  see if they'll do anything about it. It was just inappropriate. I couldn't even remember my damn
[51:08.920 --> 51:14.520]  phone number and he was all up in it. You know, it's just ridiculous. Anyway, all right. So
[51:15.800 --> 51:21.560]  I have filed a lawsuit in Chicago for a towing thing and I've mentioned to you a couple times
[51:21.560 --> 51:29.880]  and the judge finally accepted my suit. I'm in federal court and things are going okay.
[51:30.920 --> 51:38.200]  Good. My first status hearing. Yeah. I got the after I had my status hearing was due
[51:38.760 --> 51:43.560]  and I still hadn't been able to find the main company because they had this registered in
[51:43.560 --> 51:48.680]  the secretary of state. But I got her two days later. I finally got somebody who found her at
[51:48.680 --> 51:56.040]  her house at six in the morning. So they got her served, company was served. This is my question.
[51:56.040 --> 52:02.680]  I got just to see what you think about it. That same afternoon, I get a call from the insurance
[52:02.680 --> 52:07.800]  company for the towing company that I serve. Now they're listed on the lawsuit, but they
[52:07.800 --> 52:12.360]  haven't been served. An attorney calls me from them, leaves a message and says,
[52:12.360 --> 52:19.080]  can you give me a call? I need more time to respond to this because I just got it today. Well,
[52:19.080 --> 52:25.240]  he's got 21 days after he gets a stomach, but he never got the stomach. So I found that interesting
[52:25.240 --> 52:31.640]  and I get a lawyer calling from the party that's not even really involved in. Three days later,
[52:32.520 --> 52:39.400]  I thought lawyer shows up for the towing company and the two parties that I did not serve yet.
[52:39.400 --> 52:47.880]  Well, now do remember that the insurance company would provide legal counsel to the towing company
[52:47.880 --> 52:53.080]  and then they would also have probably because it would be a conflict of interest that they didn't.
[52:53.800 --> 52:59.320]  The insurance company, once they've been served, would have a different attorney or set of attorneys
[52:59.320 --> 53:05.720]  acting as their own legal counsel if they're named in the suit. Right. Okay. So the fact that
[53:05.720 --> 53:10.840]  this guy is contacting you, he's not contacting you on behalf of the insurance company based upon
[53:10.840 --> 53:15.720]  what you just said, he's contacting you on behalf of the towing company as their attorney
[53:17.000 --> 53:23.800]  of record because that's his job under the insurance policy. No, let me be more specific.
[53:23.800 --> 53:28.920]  He called on behalf of the insurance company. He said, I'm an attorney for Western National.
[53:28.920 --> 53:36.040]  Right. Right. I understand that. But who is his actual client, Western National,
[53:36.040 --> 53:41.240]  as the payee for the tow company, i.e., the tow company's the real client?
[53:41.960 --> 53:47.880]  Or is he representing them as their legal counsel as one of the parties named?
[53:49.080 --> 53:54.120]  You got to clarify that. Yeah, he left the messages very clear. He's calling on behalf
[53:54.120 --> 54:01.480]  of Western National, his client, that is named in the suit. And so now there's three attorneys.
[54:02.200 --> 54:05.560]  That was that first guy, and I just didn't call him back because it was so strange
[54:05.560 --> 54:09.400]  because of the way he worded it. He had to set up for Excel towing. I probably would have responded,
[54:10.040 --> 54:14.360]  but didn't. He said, I'm from Western National. All right. So that Friday, I think it was Friday,
[54:15.320 --> 54:19.640]  another attorney, different name, makes an appearance for the tow company.
[54:19.640 --> 54:27.000]  Now, they had 21 days. Okay. So that was on record. That's in the docket now.
[54:27.000 --> 54:30.360]  They had 21 days to respond to the summons, which they've ignored.
[54:31.080 --> 54:34.840]  And then on the 21st day, when they were supposed to have a response,
[54:34.840 --> 54:39.800]  another attorney makes an appearance for Excel towing, a third.
[54:41.080 --> 54:44.360]  None of them have contacted me except that first guy for Western National,
[54:44.360 --> 54:49.800]  the insurance company. So this is very interesting. Did any of them ever respond?
[54:50.920 --> 54:54.920]  No. Okay. Did you move for a default judgment?
[54:56.120 --> 55:01.480]  That's my question because I talked to a lawyer. They have a free prostate health,
[55:01.480 --> 55:05.480]  but like you said, a lot of those lawyers are kind of cowardly. This is one guy who never
[55:05.480 --> 55:10.120]  shoots me down. He just poses questions. He's a good guy. But the rest of them,
[55:10.120 --> 55:13.240]  you know, they kind of shoot you down because of prostate. You don't have the balls to do things.
[55:13.240 --> 55:19.960]  Basically, that's what they're saying under their tone. So he said, and I put a motion in
[55:19.960 --> 55:27.800]  to get more time to serve everybody and to amend my complaint as to regards to the insurance company.
[55:27.800 --> 55:31.880]  But I'm not dropping any claims or amending my complaint to the towing company. They already
[55:31.880 --> 55:37.960]  have a residue to cause judgment. They've admitted to fraud. I'm now doing a civil
[55:37.960 --> 55:42.840]  sue for fraud. So those two claims and conversion, those two claims, I'm never going to drop.
[55:42.840 --> 55:48.040]  And those are the main claims. They have not answered to those claims. So I asked the attorney,
[55:48.040 --> 55:54.600]  if I make a default judgment for those two claims, what would be the issue there? And he says,
[55:54.600 --> 55:58.520]  well, you made an motion to amend your complaint. So they're probably just waiting for you to
[55:58.520 --> 56:03.800]  stick another complaint. Like, I don't know how that makes any sense. But that's just his thinking.
[56:05.640 --> 56:09.400]  Yeah. Well, that would make sense. If you're saying you're going to file an amended complaint,
[56:09.400 --> 56:14.520]  then there may be something else they would have to answer to that's not in the current complaint.
[56:16.200 --> 56:22.600]  So by having that outstanding motion to amend and them waiting on whatever amendment that may be,
[56:23.480 --> 56:26.200]  they don't know how to answer your first complaint because they don't know what's
[56:26.200 --> 56:30.520]  going to be different in your amended complaint. They don't know if you're going to change the
[56:30.520 --> 56:39.160]  issue that you've already got. They don't know. Okay. That actually makes sense. Okay. Okay. Yep.
[56:39.160 --> 56:44.680]  That doesn't make sense. All right. We'll play the waiting game and I'll get my other stuff in.
[56:46.760 --> 56:54.440]  But now because you filed that, I would hazard to say that you kind of killed your
[56:54.440 --> 56:57.080]  opportunity to ask for a default judgment at the 21 days.
[56:57.080 --> 57:04.200]  There can't be a res euticada for a valid legal reason for the non-response.
[57:04.760 --> 57:08.680]  And you gave it to them by leaving things hanging with the amended complaint motion.
[57:10.040 --> 57:15.400]  Now, had you stated that the complaint was being amended solely for the purpose of allegations
[57:15.400 --> 57:21.240]  against the other party, not the one that you're asking to respond right now,
[57:21.240 --> 57:28.680]  and getting a finding against them will not nullify your claim against the insurance company
[57:28.680 --> 57:36.280]  once you settle theirs, then they would have had to most likely have been required to answer
[57:36.280 --> 57:41.480]  and you would have been able to get your default judgment. But because you didn't make a distinction
[57:41.480 --> 57:46.440]  as to which party you were amending the complaint relative to, they can make the legal presumption
[57:46.440 --> 57:54.200]  that they're included in those changes. You know, I kind of did. Can you let me know if we
[57:54.200 --> 57:57.400]  need to go? Because I'm probably a lot of people waiting and I could call back another time.
[57:58.680 --> 58:02.360]  Well, I've only got one other caller up here right now and hopefully Stephen won't mind.
[58:02.360 --> 58:06.280]  Actually, I've got, no, that's not true. I got three other callers. But that's okay.
[58:06.280 --> 58:10.920]  Hang on. We're about to take another break. Anyhow, guys, I see you out there. Please
[58:10.920 --> 58:14.440]  be patient and hang on. I promise I will get to everybody just as quick as I can.
[58:14.440 --> 58:20.440]  So please don't drop off. And if you got a call back, please do. But I will get to you if you'll
[58:20.440 --> 58:25.960]  stay on the line. All right, that said, I've got another break coming up here. So hang on, Chris.
[58:25.960 --> 58:29.480]  Let me get this out of the way. We'll finish you up on the other side and get these other guys, okay?
[58:31.240 --> 58:36.680]  And you can think about this also while you're waiting to when you say you kind of did. Let
[58:36.680 --> 58:45.960]  me know what that means. Okay, we'll be right back.
[58:49.960 --> 58:55.560]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. Yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.560 --> 59:01.560]  because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:01.560 --> 59:08.040]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture. Enter the recovery
[59:08.040 --> 59:14.520]  version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the
[59:14.520 --> 59:21.400]  more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous
[59:21.400 --> 59:27.080]  way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.080 --> 59:32.520]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.080 --> 59:43.480]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.480 --> 59:49.800]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:49.800 --> 59:55.960]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.520 --> 01:00:04.360]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdowns.
[01:00:06.280 --> 01:00:12.920]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[01:00:12.920 --> 01:00:20.680]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.680 --> 01:00:29.000]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:45.800]  Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:45.800 --> 01:00:52.360]  Today in history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[01:00:52.360 --> 01:00:57.320]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade
[01:00:57.320 --> 01:01:00.200]  killing 10 and entering 40 today in history.
[01:01:04.440 --> 01:01:09.400]  And recent news since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing HEPA to
[01:01:09.400 --> 01:01:14.040]  tax his law back in June county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin,
[01:01:14.040 --> 01:01:18.040]  and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file
[01:01:18.040 --> 01:01:22.760]  new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to
[01:01:22.760 --> 01:01:27.960]  test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this
[01:01:27.960 --> 01:01:32.360]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[01:01:32.360 --> 01:01:37.000]  because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:42.040]  in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:01:42.040 --> 01:01:48.440]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as well as
[01:01:48.440 --> 01:01:55.240]  other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso Kaina Esparza a Democrat who also stated
[01:01:55.240 --> 01:02:00.200]  earlier this month that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana
[01:02:00.200 --> 01:02:05.960]  cases in El Paso. However the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball an assistant public
[01:02:05.960 --> 01:02:10.680]  defender in Harris County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing on what makes
[01:02:10.680 --> 01:02:15.160]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup it's important that if someone is charged with
[01:02:15.160 --> 01:02:24.680]  something the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a
[01:02:24.680 --> 01:02:29.880]  five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico
[01:02:29.880 --> 01:02:35.400]  the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one
[01:02:35.400 --> 01:02:40.680]  being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper the
[01:02:40.680 --> 01:02:47.800]  shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure
[01:02:47.800 --> 01:03:11.800]  and prey who may be drawn into the glow. This is work roadie with a lowdown for July 22nd 2019.
[01:03:17.800 --> 01:03:19.800]  By
[01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:30.360]  because you can't talk about and you can't make a run
[01:03:35.400 --> 01:03:41.800]  we say we say ma'am if you ain't into that we don't give a damn
[01:03:41.800 --> 01:03:59.160]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio calling number five one two six four six
[01:03:59.160 --> 01:04:04.920]  nineteen eighty four all right let's see if we can't get this wrapped up with chris in Colorado
[01:04:04.920 --> 01:04:11.720]  all right chris is good thoughts clear yeah i i did kind of put my foot in the mouth i asked
[01:04:11.720 --> 01:04:16.840]  one more time to more accurately state my complaint i meant to mainly just say for western
[01:04:16.840 --> 01:04:24.920]  national but i just say that's not a company okay well there you go okay um last question
[01:04:24.920 --> 01:04:31.320]  eddie if you can maybe give me some directions through through my research if a insurance company
[01:04:31.320 --> 01:04:39.880]  knowingly ensures a another company that's doing legal activity and they know it where
[01:04:39.880 --> 01:04:44.360]  might i find some stuff on that because i'm having a hard time well here's the question
[01:04:45.400 --> 01:04:50.280]  first off that would be a criminal conspiracy so any criminal conspiracy case involving civil
[01:04:50.280 --> 01:04:58.280]  or criminal would work but the question is you say they know what is your evidence they know
[01:04:58.280 --> 01:05:03.720]  what can you submit to a court that says the insurance company was well aware that its client
[01:05:03.720 --> 01:05:09.320]  was conducting its business illegally well because three years ago i let them know and
[01:05:09.320 --> 01:05:12.840]  i sent them the ruling and they're still ensuring them and they know their clients still acting
[01:05:12.840 --> 01:05:19.240]  illegally that's a presumption is for all you know they approached the client at some point
[01:05:19.240 --> 01:05:23.400]  in time the client gave them some fake document that said they were in compliance but they're
[01:05:23.400 --> 01:05:31.400]  still not how do you prove it and make it stick i have a judgment from the city you're not
[01:05:31.400 --> 01:05:36.360]  listening to me i know you've got a judgment against them from something else that's prior
[01:05:36.360 --> 01:05:42.760]  that proved that they were committing crimes at the time right when you got the judgment yes
[01:05:42.760 --> 01:05:51.240]  and you said that was several years ago right yes okay you then gave that information to the
[01:05:51.240 --> 01:06:00.360]  insurance company uh so i'm presumably at some point rather close to the time you got it yourself
[01:06:00.360 --> 01:06:09.000]  right uh probably yeah yeah yeah okay all right so let's take the time frame here of at least
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:15.240]  let's just be rounded off and say two and a half years you say you got the judgment three years ago
[01:06:15.240 --> 01:06:21.240]  within six months you gave notice to the insurance company so for two and a half years they maintained
[01:06:21.240 --> 01:06:28.200]  insurance on this tow company right yeah so how could you account for what the insurance company
[01:06:28.200 --> 01:06:35.240]  and the tow company have interacted on for that two and a half years can you honestly say that you
[01:06:35.240 --> 01:06:43.240]  have evidence that the tow that the insurance company never contacted or required changes by the tow
[01:06:43.240 --> 01:06:49.240]  company or that the tow company did not fabricate something to give to the insurance company that
[01:06:49.240 --> 01:06:53.800]  would get the insurance company off of their back and let them keep their coverage even though they
[01:06:53.800 --> 01:07:00.360]  lied to the insurance company to keep it you have any evidence that would show none of that is the
[01:07:00.360 --> 01:07:06.360]  case no and thank you for checking me that so how about using your angle and getting it through
[01:07:06.360 --> 01:07:13.880]  discovery bingo please provide me all communications to the tow company in relation to the factual
[01:07:13.880 --> 01:07:19.480]  information provided you on such and such day at such and such time that they were guilty of
[01:07:19.480 --> 01:07:25.320]  criminal offenses and you were covering them under your policy for that while they were committing
[01:07:25.320 --> 01:07:32.040]  these crimes okay that can be an argument that can be an argument when they try to get a dismissal
[01:07:32.040 --> 01:07:38.360]  when they try to get a dismissal for correct they try to get a dismissal but they were in a criminal
[01:07:38.360 --> 01:07:43.240]  partnership with the tow company da da da da it's going to be kind of hard to separate themselves
[01:07:43.240 --> 01:07:47.400]  from that isn't it then you do the exact same thing with the tow company please provide us
[01:07:47.400 --> 01:07:52.440]  with all communications regardless of method of storage your matter of retrieval blah blah blah
[01:07:52.440 --> 01:07:59.480]  that relate to the previous judgment against you and your insurance company in relation there too
[01:07:59.480 --> 01:08:05.560]  and the information i provided them that showing you were uh uh conducting your business illegally
[01:08:05.560 --> 01:08:09.880]  and that they should have removed your coverage and thus forced you out of business but didn't
[01:08:12.520 --> 01:08:20.760]  nice okay we'll leave it there my friend thank you so much all right well good luck okay all
[01:08:20.760 --> 01:08:29.080]  right take care chris thanks for calling you too all right next up steven in texas steven
[01:08:29.080 --> 01:08:36.920]  what do we do for you yes sir can hear me yes sir it's your can all right good deal um
[01:08:37.800 --> 01:08:45.080]  let me walk through a couple of quick questions um on some citations my wife was sent by certified
[01:08:45.080 --> 01:08:50.200]  mail uh on a piece of property that we own together because i got a feeling there's
[01:08:50.200 --> 01:08:56.680]  there's more crimes to address than what i thought of which is one of hoping okay number one if some
[01:08:56.680 --> 01:09:03.080]  if a cop sends you by certified mail and unsigned obviously unsigned because she was not present
[01:09:03.080 --> 01:09:10.280]  for it uh citation about a piece of property what does that qualify as it's not like a traffic stop
[01:09:10.280 --> 01:09:15.720]  or they make you sign or they won't release you what does that work well what kind of one department
[01:09:15.720 --> 01:09:23.400]  since you the citation uh they they all in hillsborough they all claim to fall under the
[01:09:23.400 --> 01:09:29.080]  department of public safety which yes sir i know my private property is not uh these are
[01:09:31.080 --> 01:09:37.640]  i'm simply looking for one more avenue here to where uh well but the thing about it is
[01:09:37.640 --> 01:09:43.960]  in texas there's only one department of public safety so this would have to be a dps officer
[01:09:43.960 --> 01:09:50.280]  that's sending you this or some agent they're authorized agent thereof you know i never thought
[01:09:50.280 --> 01:09:56.120]  but what i don't see is what a dps officer would have jurisdiction over someone's private property
[01:09:57.960 --> 01:10:01.640]  correct so they're i've never thought of hitting them with impersonating
[01:10:02.520 --> 01:10:07.080]  a dps officer that's awesome i've never even thought of that's another criminal complaint
[01:10:08.200 --> 01:10:13.800]  absolutely hello see the department of public safety is not giving jurisdiction to do anything
[01:10:13.800 --> 01:10:19.640]  in relation to property except for cars and other things that may be a danger on the public highways
[01:10:22.120 --> 01:10:28.440]  so how would the dps have anything at all to do with your private property if it's not an automobile
[01:10:28.440 --> 01:10:36.520]  on the road well i've also got him for impersonating a local building official and impersonating a
[01:10:36.520 --> 01:10:44.120]  code enforcement officer so you know that's quite possible but what they okay so the agency it says
[01:10:44.120 --> 01:10:51.560]  that's issuing the citation is department of public safety yes sir okay but does it have a name
[01:10:51.560 --> 01:10:58.440]  of the issuing officer even if it doesn't have a signature oh no he signed it it's just nothing
[01:10:58.440 --> 01:11:04.440]  that my wife could have possibly signed and was never present for he just issued he just wrote
[01:11:04.440 --> 01:11:12.920]  up a citation and he sent him by certifying what's what's the charge it's some kind of
[01:11:14.200 --> 01:11:20.520]  violation trying to claim junk or something the house needs to be worked at the piece it's a house
[01:11:20.520 --> 01:11:26.680]  we're working on and he just claims junk on the board or something like that which there isn't
[01:11:26.680 --> 01:11:32.040]  the board actually fell down and i've been taking it apart but that's ludicrous i'm not going on the
[01:11:32.040 --> 01:11:39.000]  merits the charge but you know right okay so this guy has a name on the citation that you
[01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:45.320]  can write the dps and say can you please identify the employee number of the individual having this
[01:11:45.320 --> 01:11:51.480]  name and whether or not this individual has the authority to issue citation blah blah blah
[01:11:52.120 --> 01:11:59.320]  as a department of public safety employee that's what i do first do it as a public open records
[01:11:59.320 --> 01:12:06.520]  request uh and if necessary turn around and file it as a motion for discovery and send it to dps
[01:12:08.760 --> 01:12:13.080]  and i will say i've already got him obviously as an employee you know on the employee payroll for
[01:12:13.080 --> 01:12:18.680]  the city of hillsboro okay so i've already got that open government request back but this is
[01:12:18.680 --> 01:12:23.960]  another fun i can go ahead and thought it yeah that's what i'm saying because if he's sending you
[01:12:23.960 --> 01:12:33.880]  something on a dps form and he isn't employed by the dps that's tampering with a government document
[01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:42.840]  that hold on hear me hold on hear me out the city of hillsboro claims to form a department of public
[01:12:42.840 --> 01:12:50.120]  safety they can't form a department of public safety that's the state agency i agree so there you
[01:12:50.120 --> 01:12:55.720]  but i mean it's not coming through with the texas department of public safety insignia on it it comes
[01:12:55.720 --> 01:13:01.400]  through with the imaginary city of hillsboro department of public safety insignia on it okay
[01:13:01.400 --> 01:13:07.320]  well that's that's a different thing if they're actually creating a public agency at the municipal
[01:13:07.320 --> 01:13:16.120]  level that's different they can do that what they cannot do is give their agents of this agency
[01:13:16.120 --> 01:13:26.040]  an authority they can't possibly have underlaw right okay so given that as an employee of the
[01:13:26.040 --> 01:13:32.840]  city and as an agency of the city what created this agency was it an ordinance
[01:13:36.360 --> 01:13:40.760]  now that i don't know i've never gone to the marriage it's a city agency how else would it
[01:13:40.760 --> 01:13:47.640]  have come into existence if not by an ordinance they're amending their charter their home rule
[01:13:47.640 --> 01:13:52.680]  charter ain't they do it by either way they can only amend the charter every two years and they
[01:13:52.680 --> 01:13:56.840]  cannot give themselves any power in that charter that they can't beat that they don't have under
[01:13:56.840 --> 01:14:01.960]  the constitution as a political subdivision they can't give themselves the power to make law even
[01:14:01.960 --> 01:14:08.040]  in their charter in fact if their charter does not specifically authorize the agencies they're
[01:14:08.040 --> 01:14:14.280]  creating they can't create them it's just like here in the city of austin the city of austin
[01:14:14.280 --> 01:14:20.680]  charter contains no provision for the maintenance and paying of a police department the austin
[01:14:20.680 --> 01:14:25.480]  police department is a completely private contractor to the city of austin it can't be
[01:14:25.480 --> 01:14:31.480]  anything else because the city charter contains no provision for making a police department
[01:14:31.480 --> 01:14:38.760]  therefore they have no power to do it that's a wrench in the works that nobody's even
[01:14:38.760 --> 01:14:45.000]  about to pick up and take to a nut with but it's there and i've got a ton of case law that says
[01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:50.840]  if the city charter doesn't say they can do it they can't do it and the city charter cannot be
[01:14:50.840 --> 01:14:56.040]  written to grant them a power that violates the constitution so they can't do that either
[01:14:56.040 --> 01:15:04.840]  in fact in article uh article 11 section 5 of the texas constitution where it talks about
[01:15:04.840 --> 01:15:10.680]  municipalities it specifically states that no city charter can have a provision that violates
[01:15:10.680 --> 01:15:14.520]  the constitution says that right in the constitution itself
[01:15:18.280 --> 01:15:22.680]  so they're not given power to make law under the constitution in fact it's taken completely away
[01:15:22.680 --> 01:15:29.000]  from them and given solely to the legislature who cannot redelegate it thus ordinances are not law
[01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:34.280]  in the state of texas thus ordinances have no power in effect over anything other than city
[01:15:34.280 --> 01:15:40.360]  property city employees city contractors and those people willing to voluntarily comply with their
[01:15:40.360 --> 01:15:48.360]  dumbass rules 81 else is a usurpation of power and authority that the ordinance cannot convey
[01:15:48.360 --> 01:15:58.120]  to the city ever because doing so would be a direct violation of the texas constitution
[01:15:58.120 --> 01:16:04.520]  and the legislature cannot use a statutory scheme to convert that which the constitution
[01:16:04.520 --> 01:16:11.240]  forbids into something that is constitutionally valid just can't do it in the penal code where
[01:16:11.240 --> 01:16:19.080]  they define the term law they include ordinances and regulations created by administrative agencies
[01:16:19.080 --> 01:16:26.040]  as law that's trying to use a definition to circumvent a constitutional delegation of power
[01:16:26.040 --> 01:16:30.520]  and a prohibition upon the exercise of that power by someone it was never given to
[01:16:30.520 --> 01:16:44.440]  that's unconstitutional on its face follow all right all right well hang on just a second
[01:16:44.440 --> 01:16:49.880]  even i gotta break the tape and we'll come back and pick this up okay yes sir all right we'll be
[01:16:49.880 --> 01:16:54.920]  right back folks five one two six four six nineteen eighty four we got three more segments of the show
[01:16:54.920 --> 01:17:04.840]  we will be right back are you wondering what this world is coming to and why god isn't stopping it
[01:17:04.840 --> 01:17:10.360]  then tune in to logos radio network dot com on wednesdays from eight to ten p.m central time for
[01:17:10.360 --> 01:17:16.600]  scripture talk where nana and guest study god's word to find these answers and more join us for
[01:17:16.600 --> 01:17:22.120]  both verse by verse bible studies and topical bible studies designed to explain god's plan
[01:17:22.120 --> 01:17:28.280]  as well as to provoke onto love and good works our first hour studies are in the book of matthew
[01:17:28.280 --> 01:17:33.640]  our second hour topics vary each week exploring sound doctrine as well as christian character
[01:17:33.640 --> 01:17:40.120]  development our goal is in accord with matthew five sixteen let your light so shine before men
[01:17:40.120 --> 01:17:45.560]  that they may see your good works and glorify your father which is in heaven we wish to reflect
[01:17:45.560 --> 01:17:51.160]  god's light and to be a blessing to all those who have a hearing ear so tune into scripture talk
[01:17:51.160 --> 01:17:57.560]  live on logos radio network dot com wednesdays from eight to ten p.m for an inspiring and motivating
[01:17:57.560 --> 01:18:04.440]  study of the scriptures through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved
[01:18:04.440 --> 01:18:09.960]  accepting the area of nutrition people feed their pets better than they feed themselves and it's time
[01:18:09.960 --> 01:18:16.120]  we changed all that our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[01:18:16.120 --> 01:18:22.360]  is good nutrition in a world where natural foods have been irradiated adulterated and mutilated
[01:18:22.360 --> 01:18:28.520]  young jevity can provide the nutrients you need logos radio network gets many requests to endorse
[01:18:28.520 --> 01:18:35.000]  all sorts of products most of which we reject we have come to trust young jevity so much we became
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:41.000]  a marketing distributor along with alex jones ben fuchs and many others when you order from
[01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:48.040]  logos radio network dot com your health will improve as you help support quality radio as you
[01:18:48.040 --> 01:18:54.120]  realize the benefits of young jevity you may want to join us as a distributor you can experience
[01:18:54.120 --> 01:19:11.720]  improved health help your friends and family and increase your income order now this is the logos
[01:19:11.720 --> 01:19:28.040]  as i walk through the valley of the shadow of nip i take a look at my life and realize
[01:19:28.040 --> 01:19:33.320]  there's nothing left because i've been practicing and laughing so long that even my mama thinks
[01:19:33.320 --> 01:19:39.320]  that my mind is gone but i ain't never cross a man that just deserves it maybe treated like a pump
[01:19:39.320 --> 01:19:44.040]  you know that's unheard of yeah better watch how you're talking and where you're walking
[01:19:44.040 --> 01:19:50.120]  are you and your homies might be lying to talk i really hate the trip but i gotta know as they
[01:19:50.120 --> 01:19:55.640]  cope i see my scones in the pistol smoke spoon i'm the kind of need a little homies want to be
[01:19:55.640 --> 01:20:01.640]  like on my knees in the night is 10 prayers in the street life
[01:20:01.640 --> 01:20:11.800]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio calling number five one two six four six
[01:20:11.800 --> 01:20:17.560]  nineteen eighty four we're currently talking with steven in texas all right steven let's continue please
[01:20:19.400 --> 01:20:25.240]  hey yes but well my original part of this was just asking she received an unsigned
[01:20:25.240 --> 01:20:32.600]  and what he signed it i apologize it means that her the accused was not did not sign in she just
[01:20:32.600 --> 01:20:38.280]  received a citation by certifying me is that is that worth what in the hell is that worth
[01:20:39.320 --> 01:20:44.600]  well they they don't necessarily have to sign the citation in order for jurisdiction to apply
[01:20:44.600 --> 01:20:49.800]  when it's an administrative function that's the thing administrative law was engineered to get
[01:20:49.800 --> 01:20:55.320]  around due process requirements you got to remember that that's the other reason why
[01:20:55.320 --> 01:21:02.120]  they can't convert a rule made by one of these idiot agencies or passed by a city ordinance
[01:21:02.120 --> 01:21:10.680]  into a law they just can't the legislature can't make it a law by fiat and the city itself cannot
[01:21:10.680 --> 01:21:21.320]  make it a law by declaration right number number two let me see real quick how uh what's the
[01:21:21.320 --> 01:21:26.040]  best and i've read through that i read through the seminar material i was just kind of curious
[01:21:26.600 --> 01:21:31.320]  how do you go about asking if the court is a quarter record or do you just simply you just
[01:21:31.320 --> 01:21:38.280]  ask the court or just get in writing or what do you what do you do on that well under the texas
[01:21:38.280 --> 01:21:45.800]  government code chapter 29 this is a municipal court or a jp court a municipal court okay under
[01:21:45.800 --> 01:21:51.480]  chapter 30 of the texas government code it specifically says how municipal courts are
[01:21:51.480 --> 01:21:57.080]  required to be named if they're a court of record if this court does not have that then according
[01:21:57.080 --> 01:22:03.160]  to texas law it is not a proper court and it is not a court of record okay because it doesn't
[01:22:03.160 --> 01:22:10.040]  comply with law and how it's required to be done the other issue here is that municipal courts in
[01:22:10.040 --> 01:22:16.360]  texas were outlawed long ago every municipal court currently functioning texas except for a few of
[01:22:16.360 --> 01:22:22.760]  the major cities where chapter 30 specifically creates and sets everything up about that court
[01:22:23.480 --> 01:22:28.840]  any court that's not listed in chapter 30 specifically within the statute and was created by
[01:22:28.840 --> 01:22:37.800]  uh chapter 29 instead is illegal under texas law because chapter 29 is nothing more than the
[01:22:37.800 --> 01:22:43.000]  legislature attempting to delegate its power and authority granted by the texas constitution
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:49.240]  to create and establish other courts to the municipalities themselves and they cannot do that
[01:22:52.280 --> 01:22:56.200]  if they were never given that power to give it away or they were never given the power to give
[01:22:56.200 --> 01:23:03.000]  it away well they can't a delegated power from a constitution cannot be relevant redelegated by
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:07.240]  the recipient of that power the courts have said that over and over and over again since the dawn
[01:23:07.240 --> 01:23:17.320]  of time that's true um and if it is a court all right so you still go through asking if it's
[01:23:17.320 --> 01:23:23.320]  criminal civil or administrative yes now you want to ask the court clerk is this a court of record
[01:23:23.320 --> 01:23:27.560]  will there be a court reporter and if they say well it's a court of record but you have to
[01:23:27.560 --> 01:23:34.520]  ask for a court reporter then do that okay if they say it's not a court of record then demanded be
[01:23:34.520 --> 01:23:38.200]  made a court of record which they won't do but at least you made the demand
[01:23:40.360 --> 01:23:48.920]  but here's here's the thing if there is a criminal penalty attached to this citation
[01:23:48.920 --> 01:23:56.360]  then everything i've talked about at the beginning of this show applies you get that
[01:23:57.560 --> 01:24:04.200]  yes sir so everything they have not done in relation to an examining trial even though it
[01:24:04.200 --> 01:24:16.840]  came from a bureaucrat it is still a requirement for a for anything that's alleged to be a crime
[01:24:16.840 --> 01:24:21.800]  so if they're charging this as a misdemeanor class c final offense they're required to comply with
[01:24:21.800 --> 01:24:25.960]  what i talked about at the beginning of this and they're not doing it so that's another
[01:24:25.960 --> 01:24:32.680]  motion to dismiss that they've awarded correct no finding a probable cause the allegation alone is
[01:24:32.680 --> 01:24:38.040]  not probable cause and there's tons of case law on that in fact randy's complaint that you could
[01:24:38.040 --> 01:24:45.480]  download off of jurisimprudence.com contains the very case law that says that so if you
[01:24:45.480 --> 01:24:50.680]  need to find it in a hurry that's the best place to go get it out of is directly out of his uh
[01:24:50.680 --> 01:24:59.320]  criminal complaint and uh lawsuit the due process violation well it's all a due process violation
[01:24:59.320 --> 01:25:05.400]  but i've talked specifically about the cases that says the things that they can and cannot do in
[01:25:05.400 --> 01:25:13.160]  relation to this and the case law that says that the complaint itself in this case the citation
[01:25:13.160 --> 01:25:19.640]  the citation cannot serve as a complaint unless you waive the complaint the problem is is under
[01:25:19.640 --> 01:25:26.120]  texas law nothing allows the citation to give a court jurisdiction unless the citation is
[01:25:26.120 --> 01:25:34.360]  specifically entered as a guilty plea and sent to them by mail okay that's the only time that texas
[01:25:34.360 --> 01:25:40.040]  law specifically states that the complaint is sufficient for a finding by the court any other
[01:25:40.040 --> 01:25:45.400]  time they're required to convert that that citation into a complaint and file it with the court of
[01:25:45.400 --> 01:25:52.200]  proper jurisdiction but the problem there is is that there's still no examining trial process
[01:25:52.200 --> 01:26:00.600]  for a probable cause determination involved okay which has a 48 hour expiration on it right
[01:26:00.600 --> 01:26:07.240]  correct yeah it's in so technically by sitting this through the mail with no probable cause
[01:26:07.240 --> 01:26:11.880]  determination order they've kind of shot themselves in the foot at gaining jurisdiction
[01:26:14.920 --> 01:26:19.560]  but that's true of everyone that do this that's what i was saying there is no case in the entire
[01:26:19.560 --> 01:26:25.880]  state of texas that was done in compliance with law if you find one that was it will most assuredly
[01:26:25.880 --> 01:26:37.080]  be the exception not the rule gotcha no i'm looking to tell in the subject matter jurisdiction
[01:26:37.080 --> 01:26:42.600]  me a personal jurisdiction on on this and i and i want to go backwards because she didn't tell me
[01:26:42.600 --> 01:26:47.720]  a couple of these got sent and she tried to pay him without letting me know now that i know i'm
[01:26:47.720 --> 01:26:55.080]  going back on the court so it's as long as all goes back rent is it in retaliation the criminal
[01:26:55.080 --> 01:27:03.480]  charges i've filed on some people so that's that's probably true that doesn't so and these are just
[01:27:03.480 --> 01:27:09.880]  my latest angles i'm looking to i'm taking every angle to shove it right right up the rear end
[01:27:09.880 --> 01:27:18.040]  there uh can i ask one more question before we go sure all right so i looked up the stupid little
[01:27:18.040 --> 01:27:24.440]  violation in their and then their list of fees it doesn't exist on their list of fees
[01:27:25.880 --> 01:27:30.920]  and then i looked back at what she paid them she paid up i made some you know 200 of a
[01:27:30.920 --> 01:27:38.200]  hundred whatever it was of a fee that's not on any list they just made it up okay when you say
[01:27:38.200 --> 01:27:45.240]  it's not on any list is there a specific offense defined for it rather than whether or not there's
[01:27:45.240 --> 01:27:54.760]  a list of payments for it uh it when it goes uh since they do everything on or you know they do
[01:27:54.760 --> 01:28:00.680]  95 percent of all this online now so people don't want to go to the court it says here's a list
[01:28:00.680 --> 01:28:06.120]  of fees for charges you know that you might receive citation on so however they're worth it
[01:28:06.120 --> 01:28:11.960]  yeah but that's that's not inclusive that's not that may or may not be all inclusive let me let me
[01:28:11.960 --> 01:28:18.200]  clarify that that does not mean that they didn't write an ordinance creating the offense even if
[01:28:18.200 --> 01:28:22.440]  they didn't put it in their list yet it could be something fairly new that they just did and now
[01:28:22.440 --> 01:28:26.360]  they're trying to use it against retroactive properties or they're trying to use it against
[01:28:26.360 --> 01:28:33.560]  properties retroactively i mean okay which is a bill of pains apparently correct what they did was as
[01:28:33.560 --> 01:28:37.480]  soon as people like for instance let's say that the house you're talking about was damaged in a
[01:28:37.480 --> 01:28:43.560]  recent storm from the hurricanes that passed through okay okay if that's the case and it's been
[01:28:43.560 --> 01:28:48.520]  like three months since that happened and then suddenly they create an ordinance that creates
[01:28:48.520 --> 01:28:55.320]  fines and fees for damaged properties relative to the damage done by the hurricane that's a
[01:28:55.320 --> 01:29:05.080]  retroactive law they went back they made a law now that punishes people for something that happened
[01:29:05.080 --> 01:29:15.480]  months ago in an act in an act of God gotcha right and they can't do that okay so let's say
[01:29:15.480 --> 01:29:21.000]  i do go in and i do ask them is this a complete list i want a complete list of what the fines
[01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:26.760]  are billed out no no no first things first is look at their lit their ordinances and see if
[01:29:26.760 --> 01:29:32.600]  there is a specific offense with that name because if there is then it should identify in the ordinance
[01:29:32.600 --> 01:29:37.800]  what the fine for it is not that it matters if you're gonna fight it but the point is is that
[01:29:37.800 --> 01:29:42.440]  it should tell you in the ordinance what it is whether it's on the list or not the list is not
[01:29:42.440 --> 01:29:50.040]  the law so arguing about the list isn't going to help me no i was looking for a criminal complaint
[01:29:50.040 --> 01:29:55.000]  as a new if they didn't have something that was all yeah if they don't have it in the actual
[01:29:55.000 --> 01:30:01.560]  ordinances as an actual offense then you've got to complain it seems like everywhere you turn
[01:30:01.560 --> 01:30:06.040]  nowadays someone wants your name social security number and date of birth but you should think
[01:30:06.040 --> 01:30:10.840]  twice before giving away your personal data i'm dr katherine albrecht and i'll say more in just a
[01:30:10.840 --> 01:30:16.760]  moment google is watching you recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive
[01:30:16.760 --> 01:30:22.760]  database of your personal information that's creepy but it doesn't have to be that way start page
[01:30:22.760 --> 01:30:27.960]  dot com is the world's most private search engine start page dot com doesn't store your ip address
[01:30:27.960 --> 01:30:32.520]  make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies and their third party certified if you
[01:30:32.520 --> 01:30:38.360]  don't like big brother spying on you start over with start page great search results and total
[01:30:38.360 --> 01:30:44.200]  privacy start page dot com the world's most private search engine forms forms forms they're
[01:30:44.200 --> 01:30:49.000]  everywhere but just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:54.600]  i like blank spaces on forms all the time or i write n slash a for not applicable and usually
[01:30:54.600 --> 01:30:59.720]  nobody notices or cares i never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's
[01:30:59.720 --> 01:31:04.920]  absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement and i won't give my phone number to a
[01:31:04.920 --> 01:31:09.880]  company or an organization unless i actually want them to call me and that's pretty rare to preserve
[01:31:09.880 --> 01:31:15.480]  our vanishing privacy we need to practice saying no to random data requests it's like exercising
[01:31:15.480 --> 01:31:20.840]  a muscle it gets easier the more you do it i'm dr catherine albrecht more news and information
[01:31:20.840 --> 01:31:36.440]  at catherine albrecht dot com i lost my son my uncle my son on september 11 2000 most people
[01:31:36.440 --> 01:31:42.440]  don't know that a third tower fell on september 11 world trade center seven a 47 story skyscraper
[01:31:42.440 --> 01:31:47.160]  was not hit by a plane although the official explanation is that fire brought down building
[01:31:47.160 --> 01:31:52.440]  seven over 1200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more
[01:31:52.440 --> 01:31:58.920]  to the story bring justice to my son my uncle my nephew my son go to building what dot org why it
[01:31:58.920 --> 01:32:05.320]  fell why it matters and what you can do rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic
[01:32:05.320 --> 01:32:09.560]  center in today's america we live in us against them society and if we the people are ever going
[01:32:09.560 --> 01:32:14.200]  to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights among those rights
[01:32:14.200 --> 01:32:17.960]  are the right to travel freely from place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and
[01:32:17.960 --> 01:32:22.440]  most importantly the right to do process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive
[01:32:22.440 --> 01:32:26.840]  opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process former sheriff's
[01:32:26.840 --> 01:32:30.840]  deputy eddie craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has put together the most comprehensive
[01:32:30.840 --> 01:32:34.680]  teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold
[01:32:34.680 --> 01:32:38.840]  courts to the rule of law you can get your own copy of this valuable material by going to rule
[01:32:38.840 --> 01:32:43.160]  law radio dot com and ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll receive a copy of eddie's
[01:32:43.160 --> 01:32:48.360]  book the texas transportation code the law versus the lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar
[01:32:48.360 --> 01:32:52.280]  hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material learn how to fight for your
[01:32:52.280 --> 01:32:56.280]  rights with the help of this material from rule of law radio dot com order your copy today and
[01:32:56.280 --> 01:33:06.360]  together we can have free society we all want and deserve you're listening to the logos radio
[01:33:06.360 --> 01:33:32.360]  network and logos radio network dot com all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio we
[01:33:32.360 --> 01:33:37.160]  are talking to steven in texas all right steven the last thing i said before we took the break
[01:33:37.160 --> 01:33:43.880]  uh makes sense to you yes sir uh okay we've done and i just wanted to ask one last thing hey
[01:33:43.880 --> 01:33:51.320]  i gotta i know you're working on a revision to the traffic seminar or well i guess that's
[01:33:51.320 --> 01:33:58.680]  what you still call it i'm sorry but i had a 24 i had a 2014 version is that still the last
[01:33:58.680 --> 01:34:05.480]  viable thing you had out or no well the 2014 version has had updates if you uh requested
[01:34:05.480 --> 01:34:11.800]  updates from dember for anything the whatever you downloaded last uh that's probably vales
[01:34:11.800 --> 01:34:18.760]  the original setup was done in 2011 and the law that we addressed in the seminar didn't change
[01:34:18.760 --> 01:34:23.720]  as far as the due process violations and the criminal procedures and the thing that 99% of
[01:34:23.720 --> 01:34:28.920]  the motions addressed that they were doing wrong that's all still out there it wasn't until just
[01:34:28.920 --> 01:34:33.960]  recently that any of that changed and that's all being addressed in the new version i haven't updated
[01:34:33.960 --> 01:34:39.960]  in the old okay okay well hey i appreciate your time man you haven't gotten out and thank you for
[01:34:39.960 --> 01:34:47.240]  taking my call yes sir thanks for calling yeah i was you too all right now a little appear to
[01:34:47.240 --> 01:34:54.120]  have a new caller i have a wireless caller uh if you're on the line just go ahead and say something
[01:34:54.120 --> 01:34:57.960]  your first name would be preferable and then i'll know who i'm talking to and which one of
[01:34:57.960 --> 01:35:05.480]  you's actually uh open line right now chad all right chad you're the guy what can we do for you
[01:35:06.840 --> 01:35:15.480]  okay i'm i'm deep behind enemy lines in ellinois and right now uh what my employer's doing is
[01:35:15.480 --> 01:35:24.280]  trying to force us all to take a covid-19 shot and uh i'm claiming religious exemption
[01:35:25.320 --> 01:35:34.680]  i've uh been studying as good as i can for over a year from alphonse on pro triple seven i've
[01:35:34.680 --> 01:35:43.880]  gotten affidavit and my employer has uh they've got their own religious form that you have to
[01:35:43.880 --> 01:35:52.360]  fill out on their computer system and what i'm wondering is uh the best that and i'm trying
[01:35:52.360 --> 01:35:56.360]  to help a lot of people because everybody's desperate i'm telling you we're not going to
[01:35:56.360 --> 01:36:00.200]  take it i'm going to quit my i'm not actually i'm not going to quit i'm going to get fired i'm
[01:36:00.200 --> 01:36:07.800]  going to make them fire me so what i'm trying to do is i'm wondering if i should just go down to
[01:36:07.800 --> 01:36:15.320]  the courthouse with my affidavit and then go file it with my hr department today i wrote a
[01:36:16.920 --> 01:36:25.480]  email to the corporate uh people and what they and and this is what i told them okay
[01:36:25.480 --> 01:36:37.000]  okay they're they're hiding behind a uh like a committee okay so i asked them i need i i asked
[01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:42.600]  i said personnel passing judgment for individuals seeking religious exemption should be brought
[01:36:42.600 --> 01:36:50.200]  into the light i would like to address each person on a board personally in writing committees
[01:36:50.200 --> 01:36:57.080]  for important decisions should be known individually not as a collective and one would
[01:36:57.080 --> 01:37:05.880]  think if every intent is above board then this should not be a problem thank you chad so i'm
[01:37:05.880 --> 01:37:15.080]  wondering uh if should i if they don't give me the names of these people should i just send it
[01:37:15.080 --> 01:37:23.640]  the affidavit to the ceo of our corporation and notice him or should i i don't know what your
[01:37:23.640 --> 01:37:28.520]  internal corporate politics there are like but what you're doing right now is starting a political
[01:37:28.520 --> 01:37:34.840]  fight okay if you go that route you're going to open a can of worms that they can use against you
[01:37:34.840 --> 01:37:39.480]  later and then they're going to be able to get away with saying you weren't they didn't do such
[01:37:39.480 --> 01:37:45.720]  and such to you based upon your refusal take the shot you understand that yeah you're setting
[01:37:45.720 --> 01:37:52.040]  yourself up for a black hole that you're not going to be able to avoid later in relation to the other
[01:37:52.040 --> 01:37:56.600]  things they're trying to push down your throat because now you give them a way to sidestep
[01:37:56.600 --> 01:38:03.400]  that allegation okay that's that's just my personal thoughts on it but that's something you need to
[01:38:03.400 --> 01:38:08.760]  consider if you're really trying to look for a toehold and arguing i'm not going to take your
[01:38:08.760 --> 01:38:17.400]  mandatory your vaccine requirement and get it i'm not going to do it okay so what given that go
[01:38:17.400 --> 01:38:24.760]  ahead focus on the religious objection aspect if they just say submit it in lieu of whatever their
[01:38:24.760 --> 01:38:29.800]  official form of it is print out a copy of their form and attach it to the back of it when you file
[01:38:29.800 --> 01:38:35.960]  yours if they demand that you fill out their form what is it about their form that they think is
[01:38:35.960 --> 01:38:41.880]  going to serve them better than the one you gave them what is on their form that they can try to
[01:38:41.880 --> 01:38:49.400]  use against you later if they want to have a reason to do so that's the first that's the only
[01:38:49.400 --> 01:38:55.960]  reason i can find for a company to man mandate a particular form to file for such a thing
[01:38:57.400 --> 01:39:04.200]  yes it's healthcare and i think it's going to be a i don't know for a fact but it seems like a trap
[01:39:04.200 --> 01:39:11.240]  when they say name of religion that's my point that's my specific point okay because what they're
[01:39:11.240 --> 01:39:16.600]  wanting you to do is when they say name a specific religion they're going to try to figure out whether
[01:39:16.600 --> 01:39:22.760]  or not this religion that you're a part of if the people who represent this religion overall like
[01:39:22.760 --> 01:39:28.520]  say it's Catholicism the bishops all say take the vaccine then they're going to say your exemption
[01:39:28.520 --> 01:39:34.360]  claim is dirt because the people in charge of your religion say do it so you can't claim an
[01:39:34.360 --> 01:39:41.560]  exemption when those above you say do it that's why they want you to name a religion what what
[01:39:41.560 --> 01:39:52.120]  i was thinking of on this is if i claim uh the holy bible because and this was my argument okay
[01:39:52.120 --> 01:40:03.400]  okay my my beliefs are not tied to a to another man they're not tied to a religion which is a
[01:40:03.400 --> 01:40:09.800]  business they are not tied to a building to a specific church which is a business they're
[01:40:09.800 --> 01:40:16.920]  trying they but listen listen to what you're saying you're you're stating i'm going to make
[01:40:16.920 --> 01:40:24.120]  a religious exemption uh request here and then you're arguing that a religion is something
[01:40:25.160 --> 01:40:27.720]  that won't protect you how's that going to help you
[01:40:31.320 --> 01:40:40.280]  right right i'm kind of in a in a corrupt in a in a tight spot aren't i
[01:40:40.280 --> 01:40:48.680]  okay no you just have to choose your words better my religion is the inerrant word of god
[01:40:48.680 --> 01:40:55.240]  as stated by the holy bible whatever version thereof it's not an organized church religion
[01:40:55.240 --> 01:41:00.680]  it's not an organized body religion it is the body of the word of god in the form of the holy bible
[01:41:01.480 --> 01:41:07.480]  and my belief system is based upon that inerrant word of god therefore i based my demand for
[01:41:07.480 --> 01:41:16.520]  for an exemption upon the orders given me by the word of god in my book okay
[01:41:18.200 --> 01:41:20.120]  so you didn't even have to use the word religion
[01:41:23.880 --> 01:41:32.600]  i appreciate you you got no idea i got a lot of people i've been i've been beating myself up i'm
[01:41:32.600 --> 01:41:41.000]  trying to help as many people as i can they're giving up and uh i'm standing my ground and i
[01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:46.680]  tell you what i really appreciate you taking my call yeah well i can't guarantee it'll work
[01:41:46.680 --> 01:41:50.600]  any better than anything else people are trying to do right now with the way the system is rigged
[01:41:50.600 --> 01:41:54.440]  to work in the favor of those making demands instead of those who are making demands upon
[01:41:55.640 --> 01:41:59.800]  but everybody's got to make a choice about what they're willing to accept and what they're not
[01:41:59.800 --> 01:42:05.720]  so i wish you lots of luck in that regard eddie i got another question for you too
[01:42:05.720 --> 01:42:13.480]  so okay if they if they don't accept my religious exemption okay for this COVID-19 vaccine
[01:42:14.920 --> 01:42:24.440]  do i have what recourse do i have as far as them violating my uh my well see well here's the thing
[01:42:24.440 --> 01:42:32.120]  see the united states constitution says freedom of religion therefore there are no specific
[01:42:32.120 --> 01:42:41.800]  religions that fall within an exception according to that coverage okay so as long as your religion
[01:42:41.800 --> 01:42:47.240]  is not one that would be recognized as a non-religion because of certain practices it may contain
[01:42:47.240 --> 01:42:54.440]  that are in violation of of particular law your employer can't say that's not a valid religion
[01:42:55.640 --> 01:43:04.040]  you see what i'm saying okay yeah so go with the body of the bible as far as the word as the spoken
[01:43:04.040 --> 01:43:11.240]  word of god yeah your religion is god's law as as stated by the inerrant word written into the holy
[01:43:11.240 --> 01:43:22.440]  bible and whatever version of bible you rely upon okay all right well but now when they ask you
[01:43:22.440 --> 01:43:28.520]  well what particular passion says don't get a vaccine that's not really a vaccine you better
[01:43:28.520 --> 01:43:36.120]  be able to say which one that is right right my statement is on here is i was created and
[01:43:36.120 --> 01:43:47.080]  god's perfect image you're there yeah i'm here uh genesis 127 i have a god given right to decline
[01:43:47.080 --> 01:43:54.760]  all attempts to access influence restrict and or otherwise alter any and all of my god okay hang on
[01:43:54.760 --> 01:44:02.280]  hang on jen hang on i gotta break the stage hold on i love logos without the shows on this network
[01:44:02.280 --> 01:44:06.680]  i'd be almost as ignorant as my friends i'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going
[01:44:06.680 --> 01:44:12.440]  back i need my truth pick i'd be lost without logos and i really want to help keep this network on
[01:44:12.440 --> 01:44:16.840]  the air i'd love to volunteer as a show producer but i'm a bit of a bloodite and i really don't have
[01:44:16.840 --> 01:44:22.760]  any money to give because i spent it all on supplements how can i help logos well i'm glad
[01:44:22.760 --> 01:44:28.040]  you asked whenever you order anything from amazon you can help logos and order your supplies or
[01:44:28.040 --> 01:44:34.360]  holiday gifts first thing you do is clear your cookies now go to logos radio network dot com
[01:44:34.360 --> 01:44:40.760]  tick on the amazon logo and bookmark it now when you order anything from amazon you use that link
[01:44:40.760 --> 01:44:46.760]  and logos gets a few pesos do i pay extra no do i have to do anything different when i order
[01:44:46.760 --> 01:44:53.800]  no can i use my amazon pride no i mean yes wow giving without doing anything or spending any money
[01:44:53.800 --> 01:45:01.960]  this is perfect thank you so much we are welcome happy holidays logos are you the plaintiff or
[01:45:01.960 --> 01:45:08.440]  defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary the affordable easy
[01:45:08.440 --> 01:45:16.680]  to understand four cd course that will show you how in 24 hours step by step if you have a lawyer
[01:45:16.680 --> 01:45:22.040]  know what your lawyer should be doing if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself
[01:45:22.040 --> 01:45:29.240]  thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too jurisdictionary was created
[01:45:29.240 --> 01:45:36.120]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit
[01:45:36.120 --> 01:45:41.640]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our
[01:45:41.640 --> 01:45:49.320]  american courts you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases
[01:45:49.320 --> 01:45:56.120]  prosa tactics and much more please visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the banner
[01:45:56.120 --> 01:45:59.960]  or call toll free 866 law easy
[01:46:04.840 --> 01:46:11.080]  no one the day i was born so nurses all got around the gates and wide wonder
[01:46:11.080 --> 01:46:20.360]  the joy they have found the nurse for good to leave this world she can tell right away
[01:46:21.560 --> 01:46:25.240]  but i was bad as a bone bad as a bone
[01:46:26.520 --> 01:46:27.560]  bad as a bone
[01:46:27.560 --> 01:46:44.760]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio call in number won't matter we're in the last
[01:46:44.760 --> 01:46:49.480]  segment of the show all right that said let's get back to our caller see if we can't clear this
[01:46:49.480 --> 01:46:58.680]  board real quick all right chad go ahead okay so i'm stating i have a god-given right
[01:46:59.720 --> 01:47:07.240]  decline all attempts to access influence restrict and otherwise alter any and all of my god-given
[01:47:07.240 --> 01:47:12.920]  biological materials biological functions and or biological systems which are unique flawless
[01:47:12.920 --> 01:47:21.080]  and yeah but let me let me let me put a little bug in here here go for the more the more you say
[01:47:21.960 --> 01:47:30.120]  and the more details you give the more prying points you give them to tear your rebuttal apart
[01:47:30.120 --> 01:47:39.640]  with don't okay do that okay okay because let me let me show you an example here well sir have
[01:47:39.640 --> 01:47:44.360]  you ever been involved in an accident that required you to go into the hospital and get a blood transfusion
[01:47:46.280 --> 01:47:52.040]  the moment you say yes your objection goes right out the window doesn't it yes it does
[01:47:52.920 --> 01:47:59.720]  have you ever gone and gotten a flu shot have you ever gone and gotten any type of medication
[01:47:59.720 --> 01:48:10.840]  and used it to alter the chemical process of your body yep so the more you say the worst you make
[01:48:10.840 --> 01:48:21.560]  things for yourself don't you yes you're correct so keep it simple the kiss principle okay
[01:48:21.560 --> 01:48:28.280]  fair enough i appreciate it eddie yes sir
[01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:36.520]  got anything else nope you've you've uh you've helped me quite a bit i think i you just gave me
[01:48:36.520 --> 01:48:44.680]  some clarity so i appreciate your time yes sir appreciate you call chad thank you thank you bye
[01:48:44.680 --> 01:48:51.000]  bye bye all right now we have ej in california ej are you there
[01:48:54.200 --> 01:49:06.440]  yes hi hi hi what can i do for you hi okay so i sent in my record request to the local police
[01:49:06.440 --> 01:49:16.600]  um number one i have a case where the assault and battery event um me the hospital security guard
[01:49:18.040 --> 01:49:22.440]  quite um accusing me of punching him punching him in the face so i sent a
[01:49:23.080 --> 01:49:31.960]  a record request uh to the chief of police um but it just says the first name as a mic
[01:49:31.960 --> 01:49:39.560]  it doesn't have its full name so do i need to FOIA echo i well no wait a minute you you say this
[01:49:39.560 --> 01:49:48.840]  was a security guard at a hospital yes sir okay yes so why are you sending a request to the police
[01:49:48.840 --> 01:49:54.920]  department for a security guard at a hospital oh yeah i think i went through that sorry um
[01:49:54.920 --> 01:50:05.480]  um so the police came and um they wrote a report they sent it to the district attorney prosecution
[01:50:05.480 --> 01:50:15.480]  they sent me um charging me as assault and battery okay so this this went so what records
[01:50:15.480 --> 01:50:23.400]  are you trying to get from the police department in relation to that case i want to get all the
[01:50:23.400 --> 01:50:31.080]  records which is okay then here's the problem if they have a case against you you're not going to
[01:50:31.080 --> 01:50:37.560]  be able to get the evidence you need and buy a information request if the information is discoverable
[01:50:38.920 --> 01:50:44.920]  you see what i'm saying i'm sorry it's been dismissed sorry about okay all right if the
[01:50:44.920 --> 01:50:50.680]  case has been dismissed then yes you're doing correct and you need a FOIA or at least whatever
[01:50:50.680 --> 01:50:58.520]  the state version of it is all right so what you want is records of all police reports recordings
[01:50:58.520 --> 01:51:07.880]  interviews notes thank you audio video body cameras from on scene officers police cruisers
[01:51:07.880 --> 01:51:13.080]  that were there anything and everything that's documented then you're going to file the same
[01:51:13.080 --> 01:51:20.440]  thing with the hospital in relation to any security footage any audio audio recordings
[01:51:20.440 --> 01:51:24.200]  personnel records relative to this security guard and whether or not there's been any other
[01:51:24.200 --> 01:51:30.520]  complaints made against him either at the police department or at the hospital and see if he's pulled
[01:51:30.520 --> 01:51:37.720]  this same thing before this is wonderful thank you i should have called you a lot but let me say
[01:51:37.720 --> 01:51:43.800]  i mean i did but um i was just you know overwhelmed trying to figure out how to
[01:51:43.800 --> 01:51:51.320]  uh go against these you know they're well just remember you're on a ticking clock to go after
[01:51:51.320 --> 01:51:55.560]  this guy because there'll be a statute of limitations on suing for damages if that's the case
[01:51:57.640 --> 01:52:02.840]  uh it was last year january and i think i don't i don't know what your specific statute of
[01:52:02.840 --> 01:52:08.920]  limitations will be but if you're going to make certain claims you will have either one or two
[01:52:08.920 --> 01:52:15.080]  years most likely uh in relation to any uh some of the claims you're making so you need to know
[01:52:15.080 --> 01:52:23.400]  which ones that is and make sure you do everything timely um to look into the statute of limitations
[01:52:24.440 --> 01:52:31.160]  just to you have to see what the statute of limitation is on the specific cause of action
[01:52:31.160 --> 01:52:42.120]  you're trying to claim got it okay got it so i need to research that um well this is a lot of
[01:52:42.120 --> 01:52:50.120]  information so i need to start uh sorry just the the records request to the chief of police
[01:52:50.760 --> 01:52:55.960]  it just says mic you know i don't know the school name so i just couldn't do you have an incident
[01:52:55.960 --> 01:53:00.280]  report number or anything like that that they give you any paperwork of any kind that had any numbers
[01:53:00.280 --> 01:53:07.080]  on it or or uh something of that nature yes yes i have the incident report all typed up already
[01:53:07.080 --> 01:53:13.640]  something to saturday no no no not something you typed up something you got from them at the time
[01:53:14.280 --> 01:53:22.280]  or at some point during the case against you that referenced their internal paperwork like the like
[01:53:22.280 --> 01:53:30.120]  the uh the original report number the original case number something of that sort yes he gave me
[01:53:30.120 --> 01:53:39.320]  a card um that had the case number on it yes okay yeah then you then you want everything related to
[01:53:39.320 --> 01:53:47.960]  that case number every single thing but try to write it out documents notes audio video recordings
[01:53:47.960 --> 01:54:01.240]  uh emails anything at all uh interviews uh depositions written statements anything and everything wow
[01:54:01.240 --> 01:54:09.880]  okay i didn't write this down i just put um body cam audio audio recording yeah you don't want just
[01:54:09.880 --> 01:54:16.120]  that you want everything and this this covers everything you can possibly think of you want
[01:54:16.120 --> 01:54:23.800]  every piece of paper every digital audio or video recording every uh analog audio video recording
[01:54:23.800 --> 01:54:31.160]  you want it all i want it all just it's already been sent on sat saturday can i do an addendum
[01:54:31.160 --> 01:54:35.960]  saying okay uh these are all right is there anything that limits you to one information
[01:54:35.960 --> 01:54:45.560]  request um i don't understand that question uh well you said you already sent it and you want to do
[01:54:45.560 --> 01:54:51.960]  an addendum isn't that what you said all right is there anything in your state law that limits you
[01:54:51.960 --> 01:54:58.920]  to making only one information request oh no okay then follow another one with the stuff you didn't
[01:54:58.920 --> 01:55:08.520]  ask for thank you so much okay got it um i think that what i need to do but is it one thing that
[01:55:08.520 --> 01:55:17.240]  kind of catches a nerve is the chief chief of police just puts this like a mic aren't they supposed
[01:55:17.240 --> 01:55:23.800]  to give us the full name can i FOIA his his entire well does it have his badge number on it or his
[01:55:23.800 --> 01:55:32.600]  office phone nope doesn't even have it just says uh you need to send your FOIA request doesn't say
[01:55:32.600 --> 01:55:42.200]  FOIA but um your police report request and you need to uh get it and call down there and ask them
[01:55:42.200 --> 01:55:48.840]  who is mic and the full name of mic in charge of answering information requests what's mic's full
[01:55:48.840 --> 01:55:56.600]  name and department number okay no he's the chief of police chief of police you don't know the name
[01:55:56.600 --> 01:56:04.120]  of your chief of police yeah i do i i mean i went to the the website but it just says mic mic and
[01:56:04.120 --> 01:56:11.800]  his last name aren't they supposed to put the official name like i am i i go by ej right so
[01:56:11.800 --> 01:56:18.920]  it's unjunglin so that's my full name they should they should put their full name on the internet
[01:56:18.920 --> 01:56:25.800]  page well that ain't necessarily true remember that police officer's information is not normally
[01:56:25.800 --> 01:56:30.440]  made public like their home address and their full legal name for a reason
[01:56:33.640 --> 01:56:37.240]  people drive by and fire bomb their houses when they know where they live
[01:56:40.120 --> 01:56:50.440]  i see well i mean i need to address them by his full legal name not just mic you know well not
[01:56:50.440 --> 01:56:56.200]  for an information request you don't the information request is something they have to comply with
[01:56:56.200 --> 01:57:02.680]  regardless of the name of the individual that's required to do it okay got it i'm understanding
[01:57:02.680 --> 01:57:09.640]  your um giving clarification on all this yeah the information request is not based upon you getting
[01:57:09.640 --> 01:57:16.840]  the information according to who is doing it okay it's based upon the law saying if they request
[01:57:16.840 --> 01:57:21.400]  records that this that's responsive to a records request and the law says it's something you have
[01:57:21.400 --> 01:57:26.520]  to give them you have to give it to them doesn't matter if your name is mic mildred or murray the
[01:57:27.960 --> 01:57:36.280]  the a-hole you still got to get it i got it so okay what i did um thank you so much i really
[01:57:36.280 --> 01:57:41.480]  appreciate your help i bless you i bless you thank you thank you ma'am you have a great night
[01:57:41.480 --> 01:57:50.760]  you too bye bye bye all right uh john in new york i'm sorry i couldn't get to you man uh i tried
[01:57:50.760 --> 01:57:55.560]  to get there as quick as i could but tonight i had a full board all right this has been the
[01:57:55.560 --> 01:58:00.040]  monday night rule of law radio show with your host eddie craig i want to thank all of the callers and
[01:58:00.040 --> 01:58:05.880]  all of the listeners out there just please keep us in your financial prayers and money streams
[01:58:05.880 --> 01:58:11.000]  whenever and however you can i know it's tough times out there for everybody but just remember
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:17.480]  that's equally true for us because everything we survive on here comes from you guys all of our
[01:58:17.480 --> 01:58:24.600]  time and effort is spent at making things available to you information wise and process wise to save
[01:58:24.600 --> 01:58:29.720]  you all the money that these people are trying to steal from you a little reciprocation for that's
[01:58:29.720 --> 01:58:38.440]  a great thing you know keep us alive so that we can keep you going and fine free okay that said
[01:58:38.440 --> 01:58:43.240]  folks i want to thank you all for listening for all your support to me personally and to the network
[01:58:43.240 --> 01:58:49.240]  as a whole we could not be here without you so all of you have a great week good night
[01:58:49.960 --> 01:58:56.440]  bibles for america is offering absolutely free a unique study bible called the new testament
[01:58:56.440 --> 01:59:01.400]  recovery version the new testament recovery version has over nine thousand footnotes that
[01:59:01.400 --> 01:59:07.960]  explain what the bible says verse by verse helping you to know god and to know the meaning of life
[01:59:07.960 --> 01:59:14.360]  order your free copy today from bibles for america call us toll free at eight eight eight five five
[01:59:14.360 --> 01:59:23.000]  one zero one zero two or visit us online at bfa.org this translation is highly accurate and it comes
[01:59:23.000 --> 01:59:29.880]  with over 13 000 cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the bible
[01:59:29.880 --> 01:59:35.080]  this is truly a bible you can understand to get your free copy of the new testament recovery
[01:59:35.080 --> 01:59:42.040]  version call us toll free at eight eight eight five five one zero one zero two that's eight eight eight
[01:59:42.040 --> 01:59:53.320]  five five one zero one zero two or visit us online at bfa.org looking for some truth you found it
[01:59:53.320 --> 02:00:06.120]  logosradionetwork.com