[00:00.000 --> 00:08.740] Okay, not only are our speed limits not fixed, they are not applicable to all travelers upon [00:08.740 --> 00:10.060] the highways. [00:10.060 --> 00:16.220] In other words, there is no such offense in Texas as speeding in any code anywhere. [00:16.220 --> 00:19.660] It is a completely fabricated charge. [00:19.660 --> 00:26.980] All Texas speed signs posted on our roads and highways are subject to section 201.904 [00:26.980 --> 00:33.820] transportation code, which reads section 201.904 speed signs. [00:33.820 --> 00:36.980] That's how it's titled, speed signs. [00:36.980 --> 00:41.140] The department shall erect and maintain on the highways and roads of this state appropriate [00:41.140 --> 00:47.080] signs that show the maximum lawful speed for commercial motor vehicles, truck tractors, [00:47.080 --> 00:52.720] truck trailers, truck semi-trailers, and motor vehicles engaged in the business of transporting [00:52.720 --> 00:59.280] passengers for compensation or hire, and in parentheses the word buses. [00:59.280 --> 01:01.460] Do you get that? [01:01.460 --> 01:07.980] Speed signs show the maximum lawful speed for, and then I enumerate each one of these individual [01:07.980 --> 01:10.100] things on a separate line. [01:10.100 --> 01:17.260] Commercial motor vehicles, truck tractors, truck trailers, truck semi-trailers, and motor [01:17.260 --> 01:23.540] vehicles engaged in the business of transporting passengers for compensation or hire. [01:23.540 --> 01:28.540] Nowhere does the code say that the numerical limit posted on a speed sign applies to any [01:28.540 --> 01:31.660] other conveyance and use upon the roadway. [01:31.660 --> 01:33.160] Nowhere. [01:33.160 --> 01:41.660] I can hear the naysayers now, but the existence of section 201.904 does not mean that anyone [01:41.660 --> 01:48.860] can simply go as fast as they want, anywhere they want, without any consequence whatsoever. [01:48.860 --> 01:55.380] This is where Texas Transportation Code section 545.351 comes into play. [01:55.380 --> 02:01.660] Under this statute, if your speed is a factor in a collision with another person or vehicle, [02:01.660 --> 02:07.060] and I got a brake coming up, I'll finish this on the other side when we get back in the [02:07.060 --> 02:08.060] meantime. [02:08.060 --> 02:12.140] If you want to be calling and getting in line, I will turn the call and board on. [02:12.140 --> 02:19.260] Call in number is 512-646-1984, if you want to call in and get in line. [02:19.260 --> 02:27.460] We'll be right back after the break, so y'all hang on. [02:27.460 --> 02:37.060] It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway, sponsored by Central Texas [02:37.060 --> 02:38.060] Gun Works. [02:38.060 --> 02:41.660] Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. [02:41.660 --> 02:43.460] Any amount is appreciated. [02:43.460 --> 02:45.060] Everything helps to keep us on the air. [02:45.060 --> 02:51.700] From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15. [02:51.700 --> 02:54.260] More prizes and sponsors to be announced. [02:54.260 --> 02:57.460] Every $25 donation is a chance to win. [02:57.460 --> 03:03.020] When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Regal 101, you get four chances to win. [03:03.020 --> 03:06.340] Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get ten chances to win. [03:06.340 --> 03:11.340] If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can [03:11.340 --> 03:15.700] keep bringing you the best quality programming on TalkRadio today. [03:15.700 --> 03:21.780] We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and remember, every $25 donation is a chance [03:21.780 --> 03:22.780] to win. [03:22.780 --> 03:27.780] Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today. [03:27.780 --> 03:32.780] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [03:32.780 --> 03:36.540] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Muiris Proven Method. [03:36.540 --> 03:40.900] Michael Muiris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you [03:40.900 --> 03:41.900] can win, too. [03:41.900 --> 03:46.700] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [03:46.700 --> 03:52.140] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to [03:52.140 --> 03:56.460] answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, [03:56.460 --> 04:01.300] how to turn the financial tables on them, and make them pay you to go away. [04:01.300 --> 04:06.420] The Michael Muiris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [04:06.420 --> 04:08.540] Personal consultation is available as well. [04:08.540 --> 04:14.180] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Muiris banner, [04:14.180 --> 04:17.020] or email Michael Muiris at yahoo.com. [04:17.020 --> 04:26.660] That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors [04:26.660 --> 04:27.660] next. [04:27.660 --> 04:34.660] If you are listening to the Logos Radio Network, m-m-m-m-mogosradio-network.com, it's ready! [05:27.660 --> 05:34.660] Let's go, let's go, let's go! [05:57.660 --> 06:22.620] Alright folks, we are back, this is rule of law radio, again to call in number 512-646-1984. [06:22.620 --> 06:32.980] Now, I'm going to continue on here with this, under this statute, I'm sorry, this is where [06:32.980 --> 06:38.140] Texas Transportation Code section 545.351 comes into play. [06:38.140 --> 06:42.900] Under this statute, if your speed is a factor in a collision with another person or vehicle [06:42.900 --> 06:48.340] that is already lawfully upon or entering the highway, then your speed can be used to [06:48.340 --> 06:55.620] charge you with some other penal code crime if your actions cause or resulted in an injury [06:55.620 --> 06:59.740] or death or destroyed private property. [06:59.740 --> 07:06.060] Section 545.352 is the section responsible for setting the numerical limits posted on [07:06.060 --> 07:11.420] the speed signs, not for determining what would otherwise constitute an act of speeding [07:11.420 --> 07:18.180] as those elements are what is set forth in section 545.351. [07:18.180 --> 07:23.260] On these grounds alone, the officer's traffic stop for speeding or registration, had he [07:23.260 --> 07:29.540] stopped him for that, was 100% illegal under the law as it is written. [07:29.540 --> 07:35.380] As there was no probable cause to believe that the vehicle itself was subject to the [07:35.380 --> 07:45.340] requirements of either sections 201.904, 545.351 or 545.352. [07:45.340 --> 07:50.940] If the down defense attorneys, people higher for these cases would actually read and understand [07:50.940 --> 07:58.860] the whole of the law as it is written in the damn statutes, they might actually understand [07:58.860 --> 08:05.300] this and be of some help to those who are paying them to defend them. [08:05.300 --> 08:10.820] So not only was this officer completely wrong about the registration sticker being an arrestable [08:10.820 --> 08:17.020] offense, he is equally wrong about the reading of Texas Penal Code section 3802, Failure [08:17.020 --> 08:18.740] to ID. [08:18.740 --> 08:24.580] Now this whole video came about because he is insisting that he can ID the guy's son [08:24.580 --> 08:27.820] that's sitting on the other side as a passenger. [08:27.820 --> 08:31.820] The cop is intentionally misrepresenting the law. [08:31.820 --> 08:36.180] Anybody in a car that I stopped for an offense is guilty of that offense and I can ID everybody [08:36.180 --> 08:37.180] in it. [08:37.180 --> 08:40.180] No, you can't, not under Texas law. [08:40.180 --> 08:46.740] I don't care what the Supreme Court ruled, state law supersedes that ruling. [08:46.740 --> 08:47.740] Why? [08:47.740 --> 08:52.580] Because the Supreme Court didn't invalidate the Texas law and they can't. [08:52.580 --> 08:59.380] It's not unconstitutional, it's exactly the opposite. [08:59.380 --> 09:06.500] Texas law is what matters here, not what the Supreme Court ruled on general principle governing [09:06.500 --> 09:11.700] many states that don't have the law, we have. [09:11.700 --> 09:19.500] So the cop is an idiot, okay, completely and what's even worse is I have yet to figure [09:19.500 --> 09:25.700] out from this, because I haven't watched the whole video from getting in, it just infuriated [09:25.700 --> 09:30.380] me so much in the first few minutes just by listening to this idiotic cop, I don't even [09:30.380 --> 09:32.140] know what agency he's with. [09:32.140 --> 09:36.420] I don't know if he's sheriff, I don't know if he's local PD, I don't know if he's state [09:36.420 --> 09:47.860] trooper, but if he is a state trooper, this guy should not have a job at all. [09:47.860 --> 09:54.540] Because when he does get on the radio with his supervisor trying to find some reason [09:54.540 --> 10:01.700] to arrest these two guys, because there is not one and he damn well knows it, right then [10:01.700 --> 10:07.100] and there should have been the end of his ability to serve as a law enforcement officer. [10:07.100 --> 10:13.020] Any supervising officer or chief of his agency that sees this video should have had this [10:13.020 --> 10:18.500] guy on the mat and taken away every power he ever believed he had and making sure he [10:18.500 --> 10:22.100] could never go somewhere else. [10:22.100 --> 10:30.500] He is that incompetent, he is that ignorant, or is he something else, which is what I'll [10:30.500 --> 10:33.700] be getting to next. [10:33.700 --> 10:43.740] Now the passenger is not required to provide any kind of ID whatsoever, either physically [10:43.740 --> 10:47.980] or verbally, in response to the officer's demands. [10:47.980 --> 10:52.500] So if this were me, I'd say kick, rock, say, hold and take your badge and costume with [10:52.500 --> 11:01.020] you, and I'd be exactly justified in doing so, because he has absolutely no authority [11:01.020 --> 11:05.260] to do what he did or tried to do, none. [11:05.260 --> 11:09.620] The law doesn't support it, but you can't tell that to these idiots because none of [11:09.620 --> 11:11.180] them read it. [11:11.180 --> 11:17.100] Not the cops, not the judges, not the prosecutors, not the defense attorneys, they don't freaking [11:17.100 --> 11:18.100] read it. [11:18.100 --> 11:20.580] How many times do I explain that on this show? [11:20.580 --> 11:26.100] How many times have you people out there listening been hauled into court and watched [11:26.100 --> 11:28.100] it? [11:28.100 --> 11:32.540] You know full well by listening to this show what the law says and requires, and these [11:32.540 --> 11:38.860] people are ignoring it, and you're the one that's paying the price for their ignorance. [11:38.860 --> 11:45.460] But that brings us to the other article that I've been working on for the last couple [11:45.460 --> 11:50.580] days, trying to get the language corrected and just right and so on and so forth, so [11:50.580 --> 11:55.100] that it's not repetitive and it doesn't draw out the discussion anymore than it has to [11:55.100 --> 11:59.500] to follow the logical steps and points to make the conclusions I make. [11:59.500 --> 12:04.420] So before I even get it posted on the legal blog, I'm going to let the listeners hear [12:04.420 --> 12:09.820] it, and then it will get posted to the legal blog after I find somebody to actually do [12:09.820 --> 12:11.500] a proof reading of this. [12:11.500 --> 12:15.660] And folks, let me interject something here real quick before I start reading this and [12:15.660 --> 12:19.180] get off into it. [12:19.180 --> 12:24.940] I have taken so long to get the new seminar material out because I have to feel every [12:24.940 --> 12:31.980] single role that normally goes to a multitude of different people to get something published. [12:31.980 --> 12:35.740] Not only do I have to write it, I have to research it. [12:35.740 --> 12:40.940] If it requires pictures, I have to illustrate it, which means I'm also the artist, then [12:40.940 --> 12:44.740] I'm the designer of how this has all got to be laid out and put together. [12:44.740 --> 12:48.740] If I'm self-publishing, I've got to put it in the format and whatever it's going to [12:48.740 --> 12:51.940] be in on a permanent basis when it's done. [12:51.940 --> 12:53.380] I've got to proofread it. [12:53.380 --> 12:54.580] I've got to edit it. [12:54.580 --> 12:58.860] And let me tell you, when you start dealing with law and extensive discussion over a [12:58.860 --> 13:04.580] subject, it does not behoove you to be your own proofreader. [13:04.580 --> 13:07.580] It does not behoove you to be your own editor. [13:07.580 --> 13:13.060] The problem, though, is that you need to have someone with almost the same level of knowledge [13:13.060 --> 13:18.020] and understanding that you have to do those jobs so that they can really understand what [13:18.020 --> 13:22.340] you're trying to say and, thus, when they edit, they understand whether or not the edit [13:22.340 --> 13:27.900] is one of grammar or it's one of law. [13:27.900 --> 13:31.660] And then, of course, same thing goes to the publishing and all this other kind of stuff [13:31.660 --> 13:32.660] that goes with it. [13:32.660 --> 13:40.740] It is very, very, very time-consuming to fill all of those roles by yourself. [13:40.740 --> 13:46.180] So please don't let the timeframe of the seminar material concern you. [13:46.180 --> 13:51.980] It just simply takes time that one guy has to devote to it to get it done. [13:51.980 --> 13:56.700] And it's not like the law itself changes to any huge degree every couple of years. [13:56.700 --> 13:58.260] That's not true. [13:58.260 --> 14:03.660] The seminar material, in general, is just as sound today as it was 12 years ago when [14:03.660 --> 14:05.220] I wrote it. [14:05.220 --> 14:10.140] The only thing that's changed is some of the rules of procedure made some of the paperwork [14:10.140 --> 14:16.340] irrelevant because they fixed the code so they couldn't do it that way anymore. [14:16.340 --> 14:17.540] Okay? [14:17.540 --> 14:21.740] And believe it or not, people, that's one of the other things I have to do is I have [14:21.740 --> 14:28.240] to go down to the Capitol myself and lobby these people to change this crap because nobody [14:28.240 --> 14:33.580] else knows and understands it or cares, apparently. [14:33.580 --> 14:38.140] So not only am I doing all this stuff on my own, I'm going down here to the legislator's [14:38.140 --> 14:39.140] offices. [14:39.140 --> 14:41.260] I'm holding personal meetings with these people. [14:41.260 --> 14:46.060] I'm showing them what the law says, when I can wake them up long enough to pay attention [14:46.060 --> 14:50.780] or threaten them well enough with not getting reelected by exposing them to the public, [14:50.780 --> 14:56.260] for not giving a crap about who's getting screwed by the job they're doing or not doing [14:56.260 --> 15:04.260] in this case, it's a time-consuming task, believe me, okay? [15:04.260 --> 15:11.900] People just don't care enough to get off their butts and do this, so here I am stuck [15:11.900 --> 15:12.900] doing it. [15:12.900 --> 15:17.540] All right, we got a break and when we get back, I will start in on the other article [15:17.540 --> 15:22.020] that will be published on the blog sometime this week and we will go from there. [15:22.020 --> 15:27.020] So y'all hang on and we will be right back, 512-646-1984. [15:27.020 --> 15:34.140] Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under [15:34.140 --> 15:35.620] the blood alcohol limit. [15:35.620 --> 15:40.540] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers and a government [15:40.540 --> 15:43.060] cover-up in a moment. [15:43.060 --> 15:44.660] Privacy is under attack. [15:44.660 --> 15:48.260] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [15:48.260 --> 15:53.020] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [15:53.020 --> 15:57.980] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [15:57.980 --> 16:00.780] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [16:00.780 --> 16:05.100] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [16:05.100 --> 16:08.620] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [16:08.620 --> 16:10.820] Start over with StartPage. [16:10.820 --> 16:14.180] Ever hear the term fine farming? [16:14.180 --> 16:18.700] It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue and it's apparently big business [16:18.700 --> 16:20.700] in the Sunshine State of Florida. [16:20.700 --> 16:26.860] This case involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations. [16:26.860 --> 16:31.580] Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated. [16:31.580 --> 16:35.220] State officials knew about it for two and a half years but did nothing. [16:35.220 --> 16:40.220] In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document [16:40.220 --> 16:41.220] the problem. [16:41.220 --> 16:46.100] A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life but now that the cover-up has been exposed, [16:46.100 --> 16:48.940] perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier. [16:48.940 --> 16:57.940] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [16:57.940 --> 17:03.300] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [17:03.300 --> 17:05.540] The government says that fire brought it down. [17:05.540 --> 17:10.340] However, 1500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [17:10.340 --> 17:14.340] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives and thousands of my fellow [17:14.340 --> 17:15.780] force responders have died. [17:15.780 --> 17:17.260] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [17:17.260 --> 17:18.260] I'm a structural engineer. [17:18.260 --> 17:19.620] I'm a New York City correction officer. [17:19.620 --> 17:20.620] I'm an Air Force pilot. [17:20.620 --> 17:22.260] I'm a father who lost his son. [17:22.260 --> 17:24.900] We are Americans and we deserve the truth. [17:24.900 --> 17:27.900] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [17:27.900 --> 17:32.380] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. [17:32.380 --> 17:35.860] In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we, the people, are ever [17:35.860 --> 17:39.820] going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [17:39.820 --> 17:43.260] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [17:43.260 --> 17:47.260] in our own private capacity and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [17:47.260 --> 17:51.140] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [17:51.140 --> 17:52.620] our rights through due process. [17:52.620 --> 17:56.500] For Sheriff's Deputy Kay Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [17:56.500 --> 18:00.260] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [18:00.260 --> 18:02.340] is and how to hold reports to the rule of law. [18:02.340 --> 18:06.660] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and [18:06.660 --> 18:10.340] ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas [18:10.340 --> 18:15.020] Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. [18:15.020 --> 18:18.020] Hundreds of research documents and further useful resource material. [18:18.020 --> 18:21.820] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com. [18:21.820 --> 18:39.260] Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve. [18:39.260 --> 19:02.620] All right, folks, we are back now. [19:02.620 --> 19:16.140] This is Rule of Law Radio, Monday night show, it is May 17, 2021. [19:16.140 --> 19:19.140] We are live tonight. [19:19.140 --> 19:23.220] Now I want to get into an article that's going to get posted up on the legal blog this week. [19:23.220 --> 19:27.140] As soon as I'm sure it's been proof read and I've got everything the way I want it, but [19:27.140 --> 19:29.020] I want to read it to you as it currently exists. [19:29.020 --> 19:35.860] The title of this article is, A Theory on the Causation of Bad Law Enforcement and Court [19:35.860 --> 19:36.860] Decisions. [19:36.860 --> 19:39.660] That's the title. [19:39.660 --> 19:44.600] If you think about it logically, many reasonable and critical thinking individuals would probably [19:44.600 --> 19:49.780] say that we can boil everything down to only three general causes for why an executive [19:49.780 --> 19:56.400] official or a judicial court would make an incorrect interpretation or ruling in a case [19:56.400 --> 20:01.500] regarding the correct interpretation and application of actual written law. [20:01.500 --> 20:06.260] Those three being ignorance, incompetence, or corruption. [20:06.260 --> 20:13.940] However, I believe that the facts can be further boiled down to the point where only one of [20:13.940 --> 20:17.100] these is actually correct. [20:17.100 --> 20:22.460] Let me try to explain logically why I believe that is. [20:22.460 --> 20:28.420] We can presume as fact that no politically savvy executive official or judicial officer [20:28.420 --> 20:35.140] in general is ever going to admit to being ignorant or incompetent of the written law [20:35.140 --> 20:41.940] or of any controlling court opinions relative to the interpretation of that law. [20:41.940 --> 20:47.780] Because this is the presumed norm, the various bar associations would have us all believe [20:47.780 --> 20:52.860] that our judicial functionaries, the judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and corporate [20:52.860 --> 20:59.940] legal counsels, have a professional, ethical, and moral duty and obligation to know in quotes [20:59.940 --> 21:06.180] the law and to know it substantially better than any executive functionary or layman. [21:06.180 --> 21:10.380] In parentheses, yeah, they call us the layman. [21:10.380 --> 21:16.180] This presumption alone is reason enough to put forth the argument that no judicial officer [21:16.180 --> 21:21.700] can be reasonably presumed to be ignorant of what any part of the law actually says or [21:21.700 --> 21:29.100] means, especially when that particular area of law is their publicly proclaimed and advertised [21:29.100 --> 21:37.340] specialty, such as criminal defense, corporate law, family law, et cetera, et cetera. [21:37.340 --> 21:42.580] But then again, what can you logically expect from a group of individuals who serve their [21:42.580 --> 21:49.140] own private interests while literally having official and functional control over every [21:49.140 --> 21:54.860] high office in every department and agency within every single level of our government [21:54.860 --> 21:56.420] and attorneys do? [21:56.420 --> 22:02.940] Attorneys occupy every major office in every branch, department, and level of government. [22:02.940 --> 22:03.940] Attorneys do. [22:03.940 --> 22:06.620] You get that, right? [22:06.620 --> 22:13.620] Now, my personal interpretation of knowing is something as important as the law and how [22:13.620 --> 22:20.820] it is supposed to function is that one actually spends countless hours expanding and expanding [22:20.820 --> 22:28.700] brain cells over many long hours, days, months, or years in research and study of the law itself [22:28.700 --> 22:33.940] and its legislative and interpretive history, so as to truly have a deeper knowledge and [22:33.940 --> 22:40.180] understanding of what it actually says and means according to the combined whole of all [22:40.180 --> 22:47.340] relevant statutes applicable to that particular object or subject matter area relative to [22:47.340 --> 22:51.220] any individual provision, okay? [22:51.220 --> 22:55.100] The deeper meaning of my interpretation and understanding will be made clear when you [22:55.100 --> 23:00.380] read the literal meaning of the phrase, the whole of the law, a little further on. [23:00.380 --> 23:05.500] What is important right now is understanding that the highly presumptive and false belief [23:05.500 --> 23:11.060] that there really is a deeper knowing and understanding of the law by those serving [23:11.060 --> 23:18.100] as judges and attorneys is being marketed to the masses as a sound and logical reason [23:18.100 --> 23:23.780] to entrust our very lives and property to these individuals, and again in parentheses, [23:23.780 --> 23:29.180] which is an egregious mistake, rather than trying to handle things for ourselves when [23:29.180 --> 23:34.340] it comes to our personal and business affairs or actions within the courts. [23:34.340 --> 23:40.380] There is an ancient maximum law that states, ignorantia jurist non-excuse it, or ignorance [23:40.380 --> 23:42.860] of the law does not excuse. [23:42.860 --> 23:48.260] Put another way, it is presumed that the public knows the laws and a defense of ignorance [23:48.260 --> 23:54.380] is typically not allowed, unless you're a cop, right, or a judge, or a prosecutor, or [23:54.380 --> 23:56.380] a defense attorney, right? [23:56.380 --> 23:58.580] Yeah, that's the way it goes. [23:58.580 --> 24:04.740] So if the public, in general, is presumed to know the law, even if they have never [24:04.740 --> 24:10.620] even actually cede and read it, then how is it possible for those empowered by we the [24:10.620 --> 24:17.020] people to serve within the executive and judicial departments of government to apply and enforce [24:17.020 --> 24:24.660] the laws to ever claim ignorance as the basis for their getting an interpretation, application, [24:24.660 --> 24:31.740] or ruling on any given law completely wrong in any or every possible way or just in spite [24:31.740 --> 24:33.980] of it? [24:33.980 --> 24:39.420] Using this logic combined with the aforementioned legal maximum, I assert that as the public [24:39.420 --> 24:44.820] at large cannot be presumed to be ignorant of the law, then by no means can any possible [24:44.820 --> 24:50.540] level of ignorance be presumed or allowed to exist for those in any department of government, [24:50.540 --> 24:55.500] especially within the judiciary, for whom extensively learning and understanding the [24:55.500 --> 25:01.460] whole of the laws is their primary function and reason for existence. [25:01.460 --> 25:05.980] And then in bold letters, I've got the following paragraph. [25:05.980 --> 25:11.020] This does not simply mean the learning and understanding of the individual statutes, but [25:11.020 --> 25:18.740] also how those statutes overlap and are intertwined by any object or subject matter relationships [25:18.740 --> 25:25.660] with any others, even those of other statutory schemes that may exist within and across multiple [25:25.660 --> 25:30.820] sections of the same or other statutory codes. [25:30.820 --> 25:36.380] This level of knowledge and understanding about all of these various statutory interactions [25:36.380 --> 25:42.860] and relational dependencies is what is meant by the judicially coined phrase, the whole [25:42.860 --> 25:46.740] of the law, okay? [25:46.740 --> 25:51.820] So what I said before about expanding and expanding brain cells and long hours of study [25:51.820 --> 25:58.460] is so that you can get this level of understanding of how all of the statutes interact so as [25:58.460 --> 26:03.420] to understand the whole of the law, okay? [26:03.420 --> 26:10.220] Thus, if a government actor cannot be reasonably presumed to be ignorant about something that [26:10.220 --> 26:16.980] it is their primary duty to fully learn and understand, and yet that government actor [26:16.980 --> 26:25.020] is still allowed to continuously misunderstand, misapply, and misuse virtually everything [26:25.020 --> 26:30.340] related there too, then the correct presumption of the cause cannot be that the government [26:30.340 --> 26:35.540] actor is simply acting out of ignorance of such things. [26:35.540 --> 26:37.660] Consider this. [26:37.660 --> 26:43.220] If those in charge over an individual governmental actor ever repeatedly tried to correct the [26:43.220 --> 26:49.220] actor's improper understanding and application of a particular law or a duty imposed by [26:49.220 --> 26:57.380] a law and the actor still continues to do everything or any part thereof incorrectly, [26:57.380 --> 27:04.340] then they are de facto incompetent because they are demonstrably untrainable, as shown [27:04.340 --> 27:09.780] by the fact that all attempts to properly train and correct their flawed understanding [27:09.780 --> 27:13.660] and actions have failed. [27:13.660 --> 27:20.260] By that same reasoning, if the incompetent individual's supervisor or supervisors never [27:20.260 --> 27:25.260] recognized and made the effort to correct the underling's improper understanding and [27:25.260 --> 27:31.780] behavior, then they too are demonstrably incompetent for exactly the same reasons. [27:31.780 --> 27:38.460] Thus, if the individual actors at either level are determined to be wholly incompetent in [27:38.460 --> 27:44.300] this matter, then they cannot be classified as simply ignorant, nor rely upon its assertion [27:44.300 --> 27:46.340] as a viable excuse. [27:46.340 --> 27:52.780] Thus, logically, ignorance can no longer be considered as one of the three possible causes [27:52.780 --> 27:59.100] for why so many of those within the executive department keep misapplying and misusing the [27:59.100 --> 28:05.500] laws or why those in the judiciary keep creating precedent-setting opinions about the constitutions [28:05.500 --> 28:11.580] or the laws that are demonstrably incorrect and illogical, either in whole or in part, [28:11.580 --> 28:15.940] time and time again. [28:15.940 --> 28:21.260] Having now logically eliminated the possibility of ignorance being a contributing cause for [28:21.260 --> 28:27.460] any executive or judicial functionaries' failure to properly interpret and apply the [28:27.460 --> 28:32.940] law, we are left with two remaining choices, incompetence or corruption. [28:32.940 --> 28:40.460] However, just as before, I assert that incompetence in and of itself is also a logical impossibility [28:40.460 --> 28:43.540] as the cause for such failures. [28:43.540 --> 28:50.220] For instance, if an executive functionary or a judge is offered a demonstrably true [28:50.220 --> 28:58.500] and wholly viable and verifiable alternative interpretation of the law that fully meshes [28:58.500 --> 29:04.820] with the whole of the law as previously described, and all right, I guess I've got to stop there [29:04.820 --> 29:05.820] for the break. [29:05.820 --> 29:09.460] All right, I'll finish up this on the other side, hopefully I'll get that far. [29:09.460 --> 29:13.020] I may be more than half a document on that segment, so I should be able to finish it by [29:13.020 --> 29:14.020] the end. [29:14.020 --> 29:15.500] After that point, we'll start taking calls. [29:15.500 --> 29:20.580] But in the meantime, 512-646-1984 is the call-in number. [29:20.580 --> 29:24.740] If you want to call and get in the queue and be ready to ask questions or make comments, [29:24.740 --> 29:28.020] we will be right back after the break. [29:28.020 --> 29:31.220] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [29:31.220 --> 29:37.980] When your case without attorney with jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course [29:37.980 --> 29:41.980] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [29:41.980 --> 29:45.700] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [29:45.700 --> 29:49.620] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [29:49.620 --> 29:55.700] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [29:55.700 --> 30:01.620] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [30:01.620 --> 30:06.060] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about [30:06.060 --> 30:10.420] the principles and practices that control our American courts. [30:10.420 --> 30:16.540] You will receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [30:16.540 --> 30:19.100] prosa tactics, and much more. [30:19.100 --> 30:23.300] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner. [30:23.300 --> 30:28.500] Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [30:28.500 --> 30:29.500] I love logos. [30:29.500 --> 30:33.020] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [30:33.020 --> 30:35.660] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [30:35.660 --> 30:36.860] I need my truth pick. [30:36.860 --> 30:41.540] I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air. [30:41.540 --> 30:45.300] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't [30:45.300 --> 30:48.660] have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [30:48.660 --> 30:50.140] How can I help logos? [30:50.140 --> 30:52.020] Well, I'm glad you asked. [30:52.020 --> 30:55.180] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. [30:55.180 --> 30:57.700] You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts. [30:57.700 --> 30:59.860] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [30:59.860 --> 31:05.860] Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo, and bookmark it. [31:05.860 --> 31:11.740] Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos. [31:11.740 --> 31:12.740] Do I pay extra? [31:12.740 --> 31:13.740] No. [31:13.740 --> 31:15.740] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [31:15.740 --> 31:16.740] No. [31:16.740 --> 31:17.740] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [31:17.740 --> 31:18.740] No. [31:18.740 --> 31:19.740] I mean, yes. [31:19.740 --> 31:24.220] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. [31:24.220 --> 31:25.220] Thank you so much. [31:25.220 --> 31:26.220] We are welcome. [31:26.220 --> 31:27.220] Happy holidays, Logos. [31:27.220 --> 31:37.220] I'm searching a thousand dreams, they're haunted by a million screams, where I can hear the [31:37.220 --> 31:49.220] marching beats, they're moving into the streets, and if you read the news today, they say the [31:49.220 --> 31:59.220] danger is down our way, but I can see the fires in the light, burning into the night. [31:59.220 --> 32:11.220] There's too many men, too many people speaking too many problems, and I'm hard to love you [32:11.220 --> 32:12.220] around. [32:12.220 --> 32:21.220] All right, folks, we are back, this is a Monday Night Rural Law Radio Show with your host, [32:21.220 --> 32:22.220] Eddie Craig. [32:22.220 --> 32:25.660] It is May 17, 2021. [32:25.660 --> 32:30.100] We are live tonight, and I am reading an article that we posted up on the legal blog at some [32:30.100 --> 32:31.260] point this week. [32:31.260 --> 32:37.060] Now, I'm about to read you a continuing portion of the article that's going to be posted dealing [32:37.060 --> 32:42.060] with why incompetence is a logical impossibility for these people on the subject we're talking [32:42.060 --> 32:43.060] about. [32:43.060 --> 32:45.380] So, I'm going to start that paragraph over. [32:45.380 --> 32:50.700] For instance, if an executive functionary or a judge is offered a demonstrably true [32:50.700 --> 32:56.620] and wholly viable and verifiable alternative interpretation of the law that fully meshes [32:56.620 --> 33:02.780] with the whole of the law as previously described, and that the existing executive interpretation [33:02.780 --> 33:09.500] or judicial precedent can be reasonably shown to not be true precisely because it does not [33:09.500 --> 33:15.660] fully mesh with the whole of the law, but the executive functionary or judge refuses to [33:15.660 --> 33:22.300] acknowledge, accept, or even investigate and research the legal basis supporting the factual [33:22.300 --> 33:29.220] challenge to the existing and legally incorrect, and in parentheses, shorting it to bad, interpretation [33:29.220 --> 33:35.500] or precedent in order to continue applying the bad interpretation or precedent despite [33:35.500 --> 33:41.020] the facts and evidence, then neither the executive functionary nor the judge is applying the [33:41.020 --> 33:45.780] actual law to the facts or the facts to the actual law. [33:45.780 --> 33:51.460] What either government actor is really doing in this scenario is ignoring and avoiding [33:51.460 --> 34:00.380] his or her duty to know, understand, and apply the law as a whole, and by doing so is applying [34:00.380 --> 34:07.540] only that which she or he has already been shown to be a completely incorrect interpretation [34:07.540 --> 34:09.180] of the law. [34:09.180 --> 34:16.140] Thus, these governmental actors have decided to treat the bad interpretation or precedent [34:16.140 --> 34:22.140] as being the only thing that is legally relevant and necessary for consideration in order to [34:22.140 --> 34:24.580] render their decision. [34:24.580 --> 34:29.300] In other words, the government actor has just declared that the law as it was written and [34:29.300 --> 34:34.020] intended to be interpreted and applied by the legislature be damned, regardless of the [34:34.020 --> 34:39.740] facts and evidence to the contrary, as she or he is going to follow the prior interpretation [34:39.740 --> 34:45.580] or precedent of another government official or court that also completely ignored the [34:45.580 --> 34:51.620] requirement to understand and apply the whole of the law that resulted in the incorrect [34:51.620 --> 34:57.180] understanding and interpretation of the legislature's original purpose and intent for the law [34:57.180 --> 34:59.540] in the first place. [34:59.540 --> 35:05.300] Now, anyone in the legal field with a working brain will tell you that knowingly acting [35:05.300 --> 35:11.300] in bad faith under any legitimate set of circumstances is an act of willful intent. [35:11.300 --> 35:18.220] Thus, by willfully choosing to ignore the newly presented facts and evidence refuting the [35:18.220 --> 35:25.300] legal foundation of any prior executive interpretation or judicial precedent, the executive functionary [35:25.300 --> 35:32.460] or judicial officer is acting with knowing and willful intent, not ignorance or incompetence. [35:32.460 --> 35:39.340] For the express purpose of ignoring the existing relevant law in order to reach a conclusion, [35:39.340 --> 35:46.020] she or he now knows to be completely incongruous with the law itself. [35:46.020 --> 35:51.620] Thus, if these governmental actors cannot be presumed to be acting out of ignorance [35:51.620 --> 35:57.740] or incompetence to make such an unlawful determination or ruling in the face of countermanding facts [35:57.740 --> 36:04.700] and evidence, then the only cause remaining as motivation for the act is corruption. [36:04.700 --> 36:07.340] The facts are irrefutable. [36:07.340 --> 36:12.220] The executive functionary or the judge of the court is knowingly and willfully ignoring [36:12.220 --> 36:18.060] the proper legislative intent, purpose and interpretation of the law for one that she [36:18.060 --> 36:24.940] or he now knows to be legally incorrect in order to achieve an outcome favorable to the [36:24.940 --> 36:32.780] functionaries or judges on ego, reputation and career interests and not to the rightful [36:32.780 --> 36:38.860] party who should be prevailing on the merits according to the law. [36:38.860 --> 36:44.220] This can only mean that these governmental actors have acted in favor of their own personal [36:44.220 --> 36:50.300] and political self-interest while knowingly and willfully depriving that same rightful [36:50.300 --> 36:57.100] party of their full and proper right to due process and remedy under the law. [36:57.100 --> 37:00.700] This is a criminal act if ever there was one. [37:00.700 --> 37:06.780] Lest you forget, abusing the power of one's official office for personal gain or to harm [37:06.780 --> 37:12.300] the rights of the people you sought to protect is outright corruption on its face. [37:12.300 --> 37:20.020] See, I told you that there was really only one logical cause for our executive and judicial [37:20.020 --> 37:26.940] officers to be making so many fundamentally bad interpretation and precedent setting [37:26.940 --> 37:29.940] decisions. [37:29.940 --> 37:32.540] That ladies and gentlemen is the article that's going to go up. [37:32.540 --> 37:36.860] Now, if you have issue with anything I wrote in that, you'll be free to comment on it and [37:36.860 --> 37:40.580] let me know where I'm wrong or why you think I did it incorrectly. [37:40.580 --> 37:46.020] I tried to go through this as logically as possible to show we don't have a claim of [37:46.020 --> 37:48.340] ignorance, they can't have a claim of ignorance. [37:48.340 --> 37:51.820] That throws ignorance right out the window. [37:51.820 --> 37:57.580] And if they turn around and still can't do their job properly after being trained, retrained, [37:57.580 --> 38:01.980] punished for it and trained again, then they're not acting out of ignorance, they're acting [38:01.980 --> 38:03.580] out of incompetence. [38:03.580 --> 38:09.380] If they're acting out of incompetence, they shouldn't be in this damn job to begin with. [38:09.380 --> 38:13.820] Even if the supervisor isn't catching the fact that they're acting out of incompetence, [38:13.820 --> 38:18.220] the supervisor is equally incompetent. [38:18.220 --> 38:23.380] And if they choose to overlook the incompetence to the degree that someone is being harmed [38:23.380 --> 38:30.300] by either of their actions or failure to act, then that's corruption. [38:30.300 --> 38:32.820] That is criminal. [38:32.820 --> 38:38.420] So it really only boils down to one thing and one thing only. [38:38.420 --> 38:44.700] Not a single public official that does something wrong can ever point the finger at anything [38:44.700 --> 38:49.820] as a cause other than corruption. [38:49.820 --> 38:53.780] It's not a mistake made out of ignorance, it's not a mistake made out of incompetence. [38:53.780 --> 38:56.220] It's flat out fricking corruption. [38:56.220 --> 39:03.940] If they have done this before and are doing it again, there is no doubt it is corruption. [39:03.940 --> 39:06.340] Okay. [39:06.340 --> 39:13.620] Now that said, calling number 512-646-1984, I've got one caller up on the board, I need [39:13.620 --> 39:14.620] some more. [39:14.620 --> 39:19.180] So everybody start calling and let's start talking because I've got an hour left in [39:19.180 --> 39:20.180] this show. [39:20.180 --> 39:24.100] All right, that said, let's get Bob in California up on the line. [39:24.100 --> 39:26.100] Bob, what do you got? [39:26.100 --> 39:36.180] Eddie, what I'd like to find out from you, it's a little post of office. [39:36.180 --> 39:49.580] I'm looking at some post of office and nobody administered them, or whoever administered [39:49.580 --> 39:52.220] them didn't seem to want to sign the oath. [39:52.220 --> 39:53.220] Okay. [39:53.220 --> 39:55.340] What do you think of that? [39:55.340 --> 39:56.340] I don't know. [39:56.340 --> 39:59.940] What does the California Constitution and the laws of California say is required when [39:59.940 --> 40:01.900] it comes to such an oath? [40:01.900 --> 40:03.980] Well, I haven't read that. [40:03.980 --> 40:05.780] I know what it says in Texas. [40:05.780 --> 40:09.700] In Texas, that's a completely invalid oath under our Constitution. [40:09.700 --> 40:10.700] Okay. [40:10.700 --> 40:17.060] Now, another thing I want to go talk to you about is the oath itself. [40:17.060 --> 40:23.500] It is only half of the oath that the Constitution says they're supposed to take. [40:23.500 --> 40:24.500] Okay. [40:24.500 --> 40:28.580] Which Constitution says they're supposed to take? [40:28.580 --> 40:30.460] The California Constitution. [40:30.460 --> 40:31.460] Okay. [40:31.460 --> 40:36.860] So, the oath that they're being given is not even close to being verbatim the one that's [40:36.860 --> 40:41.460] in the California Constitution. [40:41.460 --> 40:46.860] The first paragraph is exactly the same as what's in the Constitution, but the one in [40:46.860 --> 40:50.100] the Constitution is two paragraphs long. [40:50.100 --> 40:57.940] Yeah, but do they apply to the different entities or agencies or areas of government? [40:57.940 --> 41:01.700] No, it says every employee. [41:01.700 --> 41:02.700] Okay. [41:02.700 --> 41:07.820] Every employee has to take the following oath. [41:07.820 --> 41:13.500] And you're sure that there are two clauses, two sections of that oath in the California [41:13.500 --> 41:14.500] Constitution? [41:14.500 --> 41:15.500] Yes, sir. [41:15.500 --> 41:16.500] I saw it. [41:16.500 --> 41:17.500] It's in there. [41:17.500 --> 41:22.940] And after they show what the oath is, it says, and no other. [41:22.940 --> 41:23.940] Okay. [41:23.940 --> 41:24.940] Hang on. [41:24.940 --> 41:30.660] Let me see if I can pull up the California oath of office. [41:30.660 --> 41:38.300] Article one section, no, wait a minute, yeah, article one section three, I think it is. [41:38.300 --> 41:39.300] Okay. [41:39.300 --> 41:44.740] And you see it's boxed in there? [41:44.740 --> 41:45.740] Okay. [41:45.740 --> 41:46.740] Yeah. [41:46.740 --> 41:49.460] Well, we know that it requires both paragraphs because the second one begins with, and I [41:49.460 --> 41:51.660] do further swear. [41:51.660 --> 41:55.140] So that's inclusive of requiring the first part. [41:55.140 --> 41:56.140] Okay? [41:56.140 --> 41:57.140] Okay. [41:57.140 --> 42:00.260] So you're saying that second paragraph isn't there? [42:00.260 --> 42:02.860] Not at all. [42:02.860 --> 42:05.620] And no one administered it to them either. [42:05.620 --> 42:06.620] Okay. [42:06.620 --> 42:09.980] Then you have a right to challenge any official function they're trying to perform as being [42:09.980 --> 42:10.980] invalid. [42:10.980 --> 42:11.980] Okay. [42:11.980 --> 42:15.980] Because they cannot enact a state law that supersedes the requirements for the state [42:15.980 --> 42:19.820] Constitution for what constitutes a proper oath of office. [42:19.820 --> 42:23.140] So the first thing you need to do is start looking up California case law and oath of [42:23.140 --> 42:24.140] offices. [42:24.140 --> 42:29.260] You need to see if the California judiciary tried to overturn the Constitution by fiat [42:29.260 --> 42:30.980] and did it through a court opinion. [42:30.980 --> 42:35.820] Otherwise, a court opinion should say any oath that doesn't have this is completely invalid, [42:35.820 --> 42:39.540] assuming anyone's ever challenged it on these specific grounds. [42:39.540 --> 42:40.540] Okay. [42:40.540 --> 42:45.340] But if you can even find a case that says this entire oath is required to be administered [42:45.340 --> 42:52.300] and it is required to be signed by the person who administered it in their official capacity [42:52.300 --> 42:57.780] and that's not there, then that oath is invalid and so is any actions being taken by the individual [42:57.780 --> 43:04.180] who made it or I should say improperly made it. [43:04.180 --> 43:11.820] And would you say I should get a certified copy of this oath from them? [43:11.820 --> 43:15.300] If you're going to use it as evidence in court and you don't want someone to have to come [43:15.300 --> 43:19.420] from the records division and testify that it's a true and correct copy, then yeah, you [43:19.420 --> 43:22.020] have to get a certified copy. [43:22.020 --> 43:27.140] Certified copies are self-authenticated because they bear an official state seal. [43:27.140 --> 43:28.140] Okay. [43:28.140 --> 43:29.140] Okay. [43:29.140 --> 43:37.100] So a certified copy would bear a state seal. [43:37.100 --> 43:41.740] It's certified by whoever's making the copy to be true and correct copy of the record. [43:41.740 --> 43:46.340] That seal that they have to apply when they make that certification makes itself authenticated. [43:46.340 --> 43:47.340] Okay. [43:47.340 --> 43:48.340] Great. [43:48.340 --> 43:49.340] Okay. [43:49.340 --> 43:50.340] Okay. [43:50.340 --> 43:51.340] Hang on just a second. [43:51.340 --> 43:52.340] Let me take a break here and then we'll get back to you. [43:52.340 --> 43:53.340] Okay? [43:53.340 --> 43:54.340] All right. [43:54.340 --> 43:55.340] All right, folks. [43:55.340 --> 43:59.260] We're about to take a top of the hour break, five, one, two, six, four, six, nineteen, [43:59.260 --> 44:00.260] eighty-four. [44:00.260 --> 44:04.020] I need somebody else to talk to when this call is over, so please give us a call and get [44:04.020 --> 44:05.020] a line. [44:05.020 --> 44:17.460] We'll be right back after this break. [44:17.460 --> 44:22.900] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated [44:22.900 --> 44:25.700] because they struggle to understand it. [44:25.700 --> 44:31.100] Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise [44:31.100 --> 44:34.340] the profound meaning of the Scripture. [44:34.340 --> 44:36.140] Here's the recovery version. [44:36.140 --> 44:42.020] First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more [44:42.020 --> 44:45.740] than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. [44:45.740 --> 44:50.740] Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance [44:50.740 --> 44:55.460] into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. [44:55.460 --> 45:00.620] Bibles from America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. [45:00.620 --> 45:11.020] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 [45:11.020 --> 45:15.100] or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. [45:15.100 --> 45:17.100] That's freestudybible.com. [45:17.100 --> 45:27.860] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [45:27.860 --> 45:33.900] To follow these flashes brought to you by the Lowest Star Lowdowns. [45:33.900 --> 45:40.300] Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold $1,429 an ounce, [45:40.300 --> 45:48.580] silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude [45:48.580 --> 45:56.940] $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum [45:56.940 --> 46:13.380] $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin. [46:13.380 --> 46:19.580] In history the year 1916 the preparedness day bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated [46:19.580 --> 46:24.900] on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade killing [46:24.900 --> 46:31.900] the 10 and injuring 40. [46:31.900 --> 46:36.940] And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hepin attacks [46:36.940 --> 46:42.140] his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, San Antonio [46:42.140 --> 46:46.260] have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they [46:46.260 --> 46:50.380] are stipulating that they do not have the time or the lavatory equipment to test the [46:50.380 --> 46:54.940] drug for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier [46:54.940 --> 46:59.660] this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases [46:59.660 --> 47:00.860] because of the law. [47:00.860 --> 47:04.740] Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter [47:04.740 --> 47:09.260] to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized [47:09.260 --> 47:15.420] in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as [47:15.420 --> 47:21.660] well as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat [47:21.660 --> 47:26.860] who also stated earlier this month that the law quote will not have an effect on the prosecution [47:26.860 --> 47:28.940] of marijuana cases in El Paso. [47:28.940 --> 47:33.940] However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender [47:33.940 --> 47:38.420] in Harris County who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something [47:38.420 --> 47:40.660] illegal based on its chemical makeup. [47:40.660 --> 47:44.500] It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they [47:44.500 --> 47:49.740] are charged with. [47:49.740 --> 47:54.380] A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark [47:54.380 --> 47:59.540] as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket [47:59.540 --> 48:05.180] shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East [48:05.180 --> 48:06.340] Pacific Ocean. [48:06.340 --> 48:10.980] According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near [48:10.980 --> 48:17.220] its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the [48:17.220 --> 48:47.060] clove. [48:47.060 --> 49:04.660] All right folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984. [49:04.660 --> 49:09.820] We got four more segments of the show here, so please give us a call and let's talk. [49:09.820 --> 49:13.900] All right, that said, let's get back to Bob in California. [49:13.900 --> 49:18.860] All right, Bob, go ahead. [49:18.860 --> 49:25.860] You know, down after the oath, it was Article 20, not Article 1, Section 3. [49:25.860 --> 49:30.420] So it was Article 20, Section 3, in case someone wants to look for it. [49:30.420 --> 49:37.740] But then after you go by there, it says, and no other oath, declaration or test shall be [49:37.740 --> 49:43.140] required as a qualification of any public office or employment. [49:43.140 --> 49:55.900] So they're only taking the first paragraph, it's just like you said then, they're imposters. [49:55.900 --> 50:02.820] Yeah, if they did not take the required oath of office, then they cannot be fulfilling the [50:02.820 --> 50:04.780] duties of the office. [50:04.780 --> 50:08.420] They're acting completely under color of law as nobody. [50:08.420 --> 50:18.860] They have usurped a power they do not rightfully possess and or should be charged with impersonating. [50:18.860 --> 50:23.980] So would you say it would be a criminal complaint for impersonating a criminal? [50:23.980 --> 50:24.980] Well, absolutely. [50:24.980 --> 50:28.540] It's absolutely a criminal complaint. [50:28.540 --> 50:35.020] Someone just because they're elected, until that oath of office is taken, they do not [50:35.020 --> 50:39.780] have the power that belongs to that office, elected or not. [50:39.780 --> 50:43.220] That's the whole purpose of having it, okay? [50:43.220 --> 50:49.140] Like right here, Section 3, members of the legislature and all public officers and employees, [50:49.140 --> 50:54.860] executive, legislative and judicial, except such inferior officers, this would be like [50:54.860 --> 51:04.380] cops, firemen, lower level employees, clerks, that kind of thing, as may be, may be by law [51:04.380 --> 51:11.460] exempted shall, before they enter upon the duties of their respective offices, take and [51:11.460 --> 51:14.820] subscribe the following oath or affirmation. [51:14.820 --> 51:19.540] So until that's done, they are not engaging in the duties of their office. [51:19.540 --> 51:26.300] They're acting entirely as private individuals using a power they don't rightfully possess. [51:26.300 --> 51:27.300] Okay. [51:27.300 --> 51:36.140] Again, you need to make sure that the person you're talking about, if they sign the first [51:36.140 --> 51:42.340] part of the oath, then most likely the office they're attempting to occupy required the [51:42.340 --> 51:44.300] entire oath. [51:44.300 --> 51:49.580] But this clearly tells us that lower level functionaries don't have to take this oath. [51:49.580 --> 51:52.980] But everybody above them does. [51:52.980 --> 51:57.500] So would the policeman be a lower? [51:57.500 --> 51:59.380] I don't know. [51:59.380 --> 52:01.540] That's why you need to check the case law. [52:01.540 --> 52:06.620] The case law should have told you whether or not at some point, a police officer is [52:06.620 --> 52:08.620] a lower level functionary. [52:08.620 --> 52:09.620] Okay. [52:09.620 --> 52:10.620] Okay. [52:10.620 --> 52:12.180] I'll look into that. [52:12.180 --> 52:18.420] Because this specifically says, except such inferior officers and employees, well, what [52:18.420 --> 52:23.300] does the law consider an inferior officer or employee? [52:23.300 --> 52:25.020] Okay. [52:25.020 --> 52:28.420] And the courts are the ones that's going to tell you that if there's no specific statute [52:28.420 --> 52:30.420] that does. [52:30.420 --> 52:31.420] Okay. [52:31.420 --> 52:32.420] Okay. [52:32.420 --> 52:39.100] So you need to find court opinions from the higher courts in California that speak specifically [52:39.100 --> 52:41.900] to Article 20, Section 3. [52:41.900 --> 52:42.900] Okay. [52:42.900 --> 52:44.700] I'll do that. [52:44.700 --> 52:46.700] That's where your research will focus. [52:46.700 --> 52:51.540] Court cases dealing with the interpretation of Article 20, Section 3 of the California [52:51.540 --> 52:54.140] Constitution. [52:54.140 --> 52:58.220] The article you've been talking about. [52:58.220 --> 53:00.260] The one I wrote or this one? [53:00.260 --> 53:01.260] Yes. [53:01.260 --> 53:02.260] Yeah. [53:02.260 --> 53:03.260] Yeah. [53:03.260 --> 53:04.260] The one you wrote. [53:04.260 --> 53:05.260] Uh-huh. [53:05.260 --> 53:06.260] The one you've been talking about from the start of the show. [53:06.260 --> 53:08.380] You say you've posted on your leaks. [53:08.380 --> 53:10.660] Well, I've been talking about two different things. [53:10.660 --> 53:16.460] One was a comment I posted on a YouTube video that leads into the same subject matter I'm [53:16.460 --> 53:18.620] talking about in the article I'm going to post. [53:18.620 --> 53:22.020] So I've talked about two different things since the start of the show. [53:22.020 --> 53:26.020] I began with the comment and the last thing I talked about was the article that will be [53:26.020 --> 53:27.020] going up. [53:27.020 --> 53:29.220] But what is it you want to know about it? [53:29.220 --> 53:33.500] Well, will that be on Tau of Law? [53:33.500 --> 53:35.860] That'll be on Tau of Law, yes. [53:35.860 --> 53:36.860] Tau of Law. [53:36.860 --> 53:37.860] Okay. [53:37.860 --> 53:44.580] Because I don't do Facebook, so I know you put stuff on Facebook, so I'll look forward [53:44.580 --> 53:46.700] to it on Tau of Law. [53:46.700 --> 53:47.700] Yeah. [53:47.700 --> 53:53.260] Hey, Eddie, I really appreciate you and thanks for everything. [53:53.260 --> 53:54.260] Yes, sir. [53:54.260 --> 53:55.260] Appreciate you calling. [53:55.260 --> 53:56.260] Thank you. [53:56.260 --> 53:57.260] All right. [53:57.260 --> 53:58.260] Bye. [53:58.260 --> 53:59.260] Bye. [53:59.260 --> 54:00.260] Bye. [54:00.260 --> 54:01.260] All right. [54:01.260 --> 54:03.380] Well, hopefully we helped out Bob in California. [54:03.380 --> 54:06.100] Now let's see about Adam in Texas. [54:06.100 --> 54:08.380] Adam, what do you got? [54:08.380 --> 54:10.780] Hey, Eddie, how's it going? [54:10.780 --> 54:12.260] It's going all right. [54:12.260 --> 54:15.060] How's things treating you? [54:15.060 --> 54:16.060] Pretty good. [54:16.060 --> 54:18.060] Pretty good down here. [54:18.060 --> 54:27.980] I wanted to go over and delve into Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 2, specifically [54:27.980 --> 54:37.980] 2.03 and down where it starts with neglect of duty and, you know, it says, you know, [54:37.980 --> 54:44.780] get out the attorney for the state has a duty to, you know, if a neglect of duty is reported [54:44.780 --> 54:50.500] and is made known to have a duty to turn it into an information and either give it to [54:50.500 --> 54:54.420] the district court or the grand jury. [54:54.420 --> 55:03.700] Now, it says in there, it talks about when a complaint can't be reduced to an information. [55:03.700 --> 55:09.340] They're supposed to give it to the grand jury as opposed to the district court. [55:09.340 --> 55:17.700] In what circumstance would there ever be where an information can't be presented based off [55:17.700 --> 55:21.980] of criminal affidavit presented by a citizen? [55:21.980 --> 55:28.220] Well, it would depend on who you submitted it to. [55:28.220 --> 55:32.860] Technically speaking, under Texas law, the county or district attorney themselves are [55:32.860 --> 55:35.700] the only ones that can sign information. [55:35.700 --> 55:41.860] The Texas courts have screwed the pooch royally when they say that an assistant prosecutor [55:41.860 --> 55:43.340] can sign an information. [55:43.340 --> 55:44.460] They can't. [55:44.460 --> 55:50.700] The law of nowhere does the law authorize the, or the Constitution for that matter, [55:50.700 --> 55:54.340] authorize the signing of an information by an assistant prosecutor. [55:54.340 --> 55:55.340] Okay? [55:55.340 --> 55:56.340] Gotcha. [55:56.340 --> 56:02.340] So, if you turn it into an assistant prosecutor and it's something that needs to be dealt with [56:02.340 --> 56:05.180] right away, they can't reduce it to an information. [56:05.180 --> 56:09.100] They don't have the legal authority to do that in Texas. [56:09.100 --> 56:10.100] Okay. [56:10.100 --> 56:13.260] All right. [56:13.260 --> 56:20.220] But as far as what those other occasions could be, it'd be really hard to think of one unless [56:20.220 --> 56:25.340] you took it directly to a grand jury yourself or directly to a magistrate yourself. [56:25.340 --> 56:29.340] In those instances, they wouldn't be reduced to an information. [56:29.340 --> 56:32.340] Yeah. [56:32.340 --> 56:38.140] Well, if you go through the county or district attorney, then I don't see where they don't [56:38.140 --> 56:41.780] have an obligation to reduce it to an information. [56:41.780 --> 56:44.460] Me neither. [56:44.460 --> 56:49.300] What I got was the response from the county attorney when I took it to him for a neglected [56:49.300 --> 56:57.180] duty on a local J.P., and he sat there and he said, well, I can't do anything. [56:57.180 --> 56:58.180] Why not? [56:58.180 --> 57:01.660] Well, I have to have an investigation by a law enforcement officer and his whole... [57:01.660 --> 57:03.460] No, he doesn't. [57:03.460 --> 57:08.460] That right there should get him a bar grievance and a charge submitted directly to a grand [57:08.460 --> 57:14.100] jury that he's not doing his job in compliance with Chapter 2. [57:14.100 --> 57:15.660] That's in the works. [57:15.660 --> 57:16.660] That's going to happen. [57:16.660 --> 57:18.460] But yeah, that's usually their excuse. [57:18.460 --> 57:20.980] They'll say, well, I don't know if what you say is true. [57:20.980 --> 57:26.020] The whole purpose of the complaint is to initiate the investigation. [57:26.020 --> 57:29.860] And that's what the grand jury or the magistrate can direct. [57:29.860 --> 57:34.540] If it goes to the magistrate, the magistrate could forward it to the grand jury and let [57:34.540 --> 57:36.260] them do the investigation. [57:36.260 --> 57:40.260] If it's taken directly to the grand jury, they can order the investigation. [57:40.260 --> 57:44.780] They don't have to have a law enforcement officer doing anything first. [57:44.780 --> 57:47.020] Nowhere does the law say that. [57:47.020 --> 57:48.020] Correct. [57:48.020 --> 57:54.420] So let me clear this up. [57:54.420 --> 58:00.380] When there's a complaint on a public official, even though it's a misdemeanor, does it have [58:00.380 --> 58:01.380] to be... [58:01.380 --> 58:03.940] Does it have to go to the grand jury? [58:03.940 --> 58:04.940] Can grand juries... [58:04.940 --> 58:07.940] Can only grand juries investigate public officials? [58:07.940 --> 58:10.780] Well, of course not. [58:10.780 --> 58:16.100] The Texas Department of Public Safety and the Texas Rangers are supposed to who are [58:16.100 --> 58:19.940] authorized by law to investigate public officials. [58:19.940 --> 58:26.260] So the grand jury could say the county attorney did his job, according to 2.03, and didn't [58:26.260 --> 58:32.460] make excuses like a punk and sent it to either the district court or the grand jury. [58:32.460 --> 58:38.460] The grand jury could request an investigation by the Department of Public Safety and the [58:38.460 --> 58:39.460] Rangers. [58:39.460 --> 58:40.460] Correct. [58:40.460 --> 58:41.460] That's their job. [58:41.460 --> 58:42.460] Right. [58:42.460 --> 58:51.140] No, it seems to me that the way the law is written, there's built-in checks, check valves. [58:51.140 --> 58:52.940] Yeah, there is. [58:52.940 --> 58:57.660] And these people won't turn any of them because it's liable to spray back in their face when [58:57.660 --> 58:59.180] it's all over. [58:59.180 --> 59:00.980] That's why they won't do it. [59:00.980 --> 59:02.980] That's right. [59:02.980 --> 59:08.420] If they turn that valve to investigate one of their own, and one of their own has been [59:08.420 --> 59:12.260] involved with them in something shady somewhere else, guess what that person's going to wind [59:12.260 --> 59:13.260] up doing? [59:13.260 --> 59:15.780] They're going to pull them in with them, aren't they? [59:15.780 --> 59:20.940] So to head that off at the pass, I'm just not going to do nothing. [59:20.940 --> 59:25.460] Well, I got that county attorney on video. [59:25.460 --> 59:33.620] I spoke with 50 Minutes and let's watch him chuck his responsibilities. [59:33.620 --> 59:34.620] I'm going to get them. [59:34.620 --> 59:36.180] I'm going to get after them. [59:36.180 --> 59:37.340] But yeah, there's no... [59:37.340 --> 59:38.940] I found no case ball either. [59:38.940 --> 59:46.940] I mean, there's case ball dealing with 2.03B, but there's nothing that I found dealing specifically [59:46.940 --> 59:53.980] with 2.03A, which at the beginning, the attorney for the state has a duty to report to a public [59:53.980 --> 59:57.180] official when it's made known to them. [59:57.180 --> 59:59.300] And there's probably a reason for that too. [59:59.300 --> 01:00:04.620] You've got to remember that 90% of the judges sitting on the bench used to be that county [01:00:04.620 --> 01:00:07.780] or district attorney. [01:00:07.780 --> 01:00:13.340] They weren't going to turn on their own any more than the one that's there right now. [01:00:13.340 --> 01:00:19.020] Therein lies the problem with letting this system police itself. [01:00:19.020 --> 01:00:20.020] Right. [01:00:20.020 --> 01:00:26.980] Yeah, the idea is that, you know, if you go down into Chapter 3 of the Code of Cromber [01:00:26.980 --> 01:00:27.980] of Seizure, it... [01:00:27.980 --> 01:00:36.620] I believe it's 3.03, which is right before 3.04, which describes official misconduct. [01:00:36.620 --> 01:00:45.100] But 3.03 defines the term officer as used in the Code of Cromber of Seizure and it specifically [01:00:45.100 --> 01:00:53.300] says that an officer in relation to 2.03 an officer is a magistrate or a law enforcement [01:00:53.300 --> 01:00:54.300] officer. [01:00:54.300 --> 01:00:55.300] That's what they're talking about. [01:00:55.300 --> 01:01:05.340] And the reason that law enforcement officers and magistrates are held to this higher standard [01:01:05.340 --> 01:01:10.620] of accountability as far as when a complaint made against them for neglect of duty is because [01:01:10.620 --> 01:01:14.820] magistrates and police officers are the ones who deal directly with the public as far as [01:01:14.820 --> 01:01:17.340] the application enforcement Code of Cromber of Seizure. [01:01:17.340 --> 01:01:23.660] So, of course, they're going to be the ones that we want to make sure there's a check valve [01:01:23.660 --> 01:01:27.540] in place so that if they mess up, we can go back on. [01:01:27.540 --> 01:01:33.300] Yeah, but notice that in no instance are either of those entities given discretion about sending [01:01:33.300 --> 01:01:35.540] it to the magistrate or grand jury. [01:01:35.540 --> 01:01:36.780] See, that's the thing. [01:01:36.780 --> 01:01:41.540] They're saying they have to have an investigation before they can take the complaint. [01:01:41.540 --> 01:01:43.860] That's not what the law says. [01:01:43.860 --> 01:01:48.820] And the law does not even mention investigation before the complaint is submitted. [01:01:48.820 --> 01:01:54.780] The law says when it's done, you will do this and then you will send it to either the grand [01:01:54.780 --> 01:01:58.940] jury or the magistrate, depending upon what it is. [01:01:58.940 --> 01:02:00.180] That's right. [01:02:00.180 --> 01:02:08.180] The investigation will then be pursued from that point, not prior. [01:02:08.180 --> 01:02:09.180] That's a problem. [01:02:09.180 --> 01:02:10.180] 100%. [01:02:10.180 --> 01:02:14.660] This isn't the problem with them interpreting the law how they want. [01:02:14.660 --> 01:02:19.180] This goes to exactly what the article I was writing was about, ignorance, incompetence [01:02:19.180 --> 01:02:20.180] or corruption. [01:02:20.180 --> 01:02:21.180] And it's always corruption. [01:02:21.180 --> 01:02:31.180] Hang on just a second, man, we'll be right back after the break. [01:02:31.180 --> 01:02:36.980] It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas [01:02:36.980 --> 01:02:37.980] Gunworks. [01:02:37.980 --> 01:02:41.620] Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. [01:02:41.620 --> 01:02:43.420] Any amount is appreciated. [01:02:43.420 --> 01:02:45.260] Everything helps to keep us on the air. [01:02:45.260 --> 01:02:51.660] Through Central Texas Gunworks, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR15. [01:02:51.660 --> 01:02:54.220] More prizes and sponsors to be announced. [01:02:54.220 --> 01:02:57.420] Every $25 donation is a chance to win. [01:02:57.420 --> 01:03:02.980] When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. [01:03:02.980 --> 01:03:06.380] Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win. [01:03:06.380 --> 01:03:11.300] If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can [01:03:11.300 --> 01:03:15.660] keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today. [01:03:15.660 --> 01:03:18.540] We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. [01:03:18.540 --> 01:03:22.660] And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. [01:03:22.660 --> 01:03:27.820] Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today. [01:03:27.820 --> 01:03:32.860] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? [01:03:32.860 --> 01:03:36.540] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. [01:03:36.540 --> 01:03:41.340] Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can [01:03:41.340 --> 01:03:42.340] win, too. [01:03:42.340 --> 01:03:46.820] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [01:03:46.820 --> 01:03:52.540] civil rights statute, what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons, how to answer [01:03:52.540 --> 01:03:57.180] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the [01:03:57.180 --> 01:04:01.380] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:04:01.380 --> 01:04:06.500] The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:04:06.500 --> 01:04:08.500] Federal consultation is available as well. [01:04:08.500 --> 01:04:14.180] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner [01:04:14.180 --> 01:04:17.180] or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. [01:04:17.180 --> 01:04:26.740] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors [01:04:26.740 --> 01:04:27.740] now. [01:04:27.740 --> 01:04:56.140] All right, folks, we are back. [01:04:56.140 --> 01:05:01.140] This is rule of law radio, the calling number 512-646-1984. [01:05:01.140 --> 01:05:07.140] All right, now let's get back to Adam in Texas. [01:05:07.140 --> 01:05:10.140] All right, Adam, any other questions on that? [01:05:10.140 --> 01:05:16.140] No, no, I mean, you pretty much, I mean, that's my, that's my take on it. [01:05:16.140 --> 01:05:21.860] I've been, I've been looking into it and studying it for a while and I mean, it's obvious because [01:05:21.860 --> 01:05:26.060] the way our law is set up, I mean, take for instance, you know, we're dealing with officers [01:05:26.060 --> 01:05:27.860] as defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:05:27.860 --> 01:05:34.380] That means magistrates and law enforcement, well, you know, according to the wisdom of [01:05:34.380 --> 01:05:39.840] the attorneys for the state, you know, what they're saying is that, we'll say I had a [01:05:39.840 --> 01:05:45.300] complaint on a law enforcement officer for neglect of duty for official misconduct. [01:05:45.300 --> 01:05:50.260] Basically, their stance is, well, the only way to do it is to get that same law enforcement [01:05:50.260 --> 01:05:55.940] agency to investigate themselves, but that's just not the way it works because, you know, [01:05:55.940 --> 01:06:01.940] the people who are forefathers are a little bit smarter than we are now, I think, but [01:06:01.940 --> 01:06:06.420] the way they wrote it was, I know 10 kids smarter than half the people we're having [01:06:06.420 --> 01:06:07.420] to deal with. [01:06:07.420 --> 01:06:16.420] You know, so they gave us multiple avenues to go about holding our public officials accountable. [01:06:16.420 --> 01:06:20.220] You know, of course, you don't have to go to the same police station to file a criminal [01:06:20.220 --> 01:06:22.780] complaint on an officer that works for that police station. [01:06:22.780 --> 01:06:24.340] That's, that's ridiculous. [01:06:24.340 --> 01:06:27.020] That's not how it, of course, that's not how it works. [01:06:27.020 --> 01:06:30.660] So we can, and we can go to the magistrates or we can go directly to the county or district [01:06:30.660 --> 01:06:32.860] attorney and, you know, each incident. [01:06:32.860 --> 01:06:35.100] We can even go directly to the grand jury. [01:06:35.100 --> 01:06:36.100] Don't forget that. [01:06:36.100 --> 01:06:37.100] Yes. [01:06:37.100 --> 01:06:41.540] When these lower functionaries won't do their job, then we add them to the complaint and [01:06:41.540 --> 01:06:44.540] go over their head to the grand jury. [01:06:44.540 --> 01:06:45.540] That's right. [01:06:45.540 --> 01:06:48.540] It's, we're, we really do have the power. [01:06:48.540 --> 01:06:50.500] The law is actually written in our favor. [01:06:50.500 --> 01:06:54.580] It's just nobody wants to go by it, by it properly, apply it properly, but- [01:06:54.580 --> 01:06:58.780] Well, of course not, because then that puts power in our hands that they have worked so [01:06:58.780 --> 01:07:01.740] desperately hard to hide or take away. [01:07:01.740 --> 01:07:02.740] Yeah. [01:07:02.740 --> 01:07:08.980] That's the whole goal here, to make us appear powerless and themselves omnipotent. [01:07:08.980 --> 01:07:09.980] Yeah. [01:07:09.980 --> 01:07:14.820] Well, hey, I got some good news. [01:07:14.820 --> 01:07:18.540] Unless you got another caller that wants to take questions. [01:07:18.540 --> 01:07:20.980] I've got one we hadn't talked to in a while. [01:07:20.980 --> 01:07:22.780] I'm going to get to him. [01:07:22.780 --> 01:07:24.940] We allow it to be on for a while, we get on with Olivier. [01:07:24.940 --> 01:07:25.940] He hadn't called in a while. [01:07:25.940 --> 01:07:27.420] I want to know how he's doing. [01:07:27.420 --> 01:07:28.420] Oh, man. [01:07:28.420 --> 01:07:32.020] So if you want to take this time to ask me whatever you got, let's do that real quick, [01:07:32.020 --> 01:07:35.900] because when I get on with Olivier, he may not disappear before the end of the show. [01:07:35.900 --> 01:07:42.660] Well, I just wanted to add that, you know, I've been listening to you and Randy for a [01:07:42.660 --> 01:07:43.660] long time. [01:07:43.660 --> 01:07:45.140] I've met you personally. [01:07:45.140 --> 01:07:50.460] You probably don't remember me, but you were the one who really got me started and got [01:07:50.460 --> 01:07:56.140] my brain going and learning how to, you know, learning how to learn and get going with this [01:07:56.140 --> 01:07:57.140] stuff. [01:07:57.140 --> 01:08:03.420] So anyway, one of the JPs I had a battle with back in 2016. [01:08:03.420 --> 01:08:08.020] I took, you know, you started me on down the right path and I'm telling you, I'll [01:08:08.020 --> 01:08:17.140] beat them and several years went by and back last fall, fall of 2020, just for kicks, because [01:08:17.140 --> 01:08:21.500] you know, like Randy said, the best fights, the one you go pick, well, just for kicks. [01:08:21.500 --> 01:08:28.380] I went in there and I started digging on and I found out that he had neglected to file [01:08:28.380 --> 01:08:34.460] his mandatory collections reports with the County Commissioners Court for the previous [01:08:34.460 --> 01:08:38.300] 10 years. [01:08:38.300 --> 01:08:39.300] Oh, goody. [01:08:39.300 --> 01:08:40.300] Yeah, it was awesome. [01:08:40.300 --> 01:08:41.300] I do. [01:08:41.300 --> 01:08:42.300] I find something. [01:08:42.300 --> 01:08:44.500] That's the one thing I want to add to these people. [01:08:44.500 --> 01:08:46.860] You know, you've got some public official that does wrong. [01:08:46.860 --> 01:08:51.260] I guarantee, you know, there's about an 80, 90% chance you start digging on them. [01:08:51.260 --> 01:08:52.460] They're messing something up. [01:08:52.460 --> 01:08:53.460] There's something they're not. [01:08:53.460 --> 01:08:54.460] Yeah. [01:08:54.460 --> 01:08:56.460] And it's almost always something serious. [01:08:56.460 --> 01:08:57.460] Yeah. [01:08:57.460 --> 01:09:01.940] So, I mean, it's easy to go pick a fight with these jerks. [01:09:01.940 --> 01:09:11.500] But anyway, I got a man and I brought it up and I started messing with him and he resigned [01:09:11.500 --> 01:09:14.620] January 31st prematurely. [01:09:14.620 --> 01:09:20.380] All right, that works. [01:09:20.380 --> 01:09:21.380] That works. [01:09:21.380 --> 01:09:22.380] Yeah. [01:09:22.380 --> 01:09:23.380] Of course it does. [01:09:23.380 --> 01:09:24.380] But people need to get more involved in this stuff. [01:09:24.380 --> 01:09:28.900] I mean, this country, I don't think we can replicate it starting from scratch. [01:09:28.900 --> 01:09:30.940] We've got to hold on to what we've got. [01:09:30.940 --> 01:09:31.940] Yeah. [01:09:31.940 --> 01:09:36.700] And we've got to fix as good as possible what's broken with the tools we have because we are [01:09:36.700 --> 01:09:40.420] not, those idiots trying to say, I want to fix this from the inside, don't know what [01:09:40.420 --> 01:09:42.540] the hell they're talking about. [01:09:42.540 --> 01:09:45.700] You cannot fix a broken machine from the inside. [01:09:45.700 --> 01:09:52.940] You just cannot do it because everything about it is broken is going to hinder everything [01:09:52.940 --> 01:09:55.820] that you attempt to do to fix it. [01:09:55.820 --> 01:10:02.940] And once you're inside of it, you're in it to a point where there's always someone beside [01:10:02.940 --> 01:10:08.060] you or above you that can block you or do worse to you. [01:10:08.060 --> 01:10:12.180] Ask Serpico about that. [01:10:12.180 --> 01:10:17.860] He fled the country and had to live outside the United States for a very long time after [01:10:17.860 --> 01:10:25.740] being a New York cop because his own department was trying to kill him because he would not [01:10:25.740 --> 01:10:27.780] partake in the corruption. [01:10:27.780 --> 01:10:30.380] And he was exposing those who did. [01:10:30.380 --> 01:10:32.100] They don't like it. [01:10:32.100 --> 01:10:35.940] You will not fix any of this from the inside. [01:10:35.940 --> 01:10:39.220] Yeah, their blue line really is thin. [01:10:39.220 --> 01:10:40.700] It's not very thick, is it? [01:10:40.700 --> 01:10:42.340] Because they'll burn on each other very quickly. [01:10:42.340 --> 01:10:46.060] Oh, in a heartbeat if they feel like they're personally threatened by something they're [01:10:46.060 --> 01:10:47.060] doing. [01:10:47.060 --> 01:10:48.060] Yeah. [01:10:48.060 --> 01:10:51.260] They're tied together with string. [01:10:51.260 --> 01:10:55.220] Well, hey, man, you're right, Olivier, we've been here for a long time and we'll kick it [01:10:55.220 --> 01:10:56.220] over. [01:10:56.220 --> 01:10:57.220] All right, man. [01:10:57.220 --> 01:10:58.220] Well, thanks for calling in. [01:10:58.220 --> 01:10:59.220] Let me know. [01:10:59.220 --> 01:11:00.220] Yes, sir. [01:11:00.220 --> 01:11:01.220] Have a good day. [01:11:01.220 --> 01:11:02.220] You too. [01:11:02.220 --> 01:11:03.220] All right. [01:11:03.220 --> 01:11:04.220] Mr. Olivier. [01:11:04.220 --> 01:11:05.220] Olivier, are you there? [01:11:05.220 --> 01:11:06.220] You're on the board, but I need you to talk. [01:11:06.220 --> 01:11:24.060] All right, Olivier, if you can hear me, I need you to like either unmute or call me back [01:11:24.060 --> 01:11:27.060] because you got dropped. [01:11:27.060 --> 01:11:34.420] All right, well, I give you a minute or two and see what happens. [01:11:34.420 --> 01:11:37.500] I'll leave you unmuted in case you figure out what's going on. [01:11:37.500 --> 01:11:41.420] If nothing else, hang up and call me back, brother. [01:11:41.420 --> 01:11:42.420] Okay. [01:11:42.420 --> 01:11:47.660] So, folks, right there, you have an individual calling in to let you know that he's managed [01:11:47.660 --> 01:11:52.100] to accomplish a lot by what he's learned from this show and the rest of the shows on [01:11:52.100 --> 01:11:53.100] our network. [01:11:53.100 --> 01:11:57.860] He's taken the information that we provide to you and he's done something useful with [01:11:57.860 --> 01:12:02.660] it, and because of that, he prevailed. [01:12:02.660 --> 01:12:04.340] He's not the only one that's done it. [01:12:04.340 --> 01:12:08.660] He's not going to remain the only one that does it. [01:12:08.660 --> 01:12:16.140] But we are only going to get as far as people will take us because when you will not fight [01:12:16.140 --> 01:12:22.940] for yourself, how can you say you will fight for someone else? [01:12:22.940 --> 01:12:27.340] Who would fight harder for you than you would? [01:12:27.340 --> 01:12:29.740] I've always said nobody will. [01:12:29.740 --> 01:12:35.980] You will fight harder for your case than anyone else will ever attempt to fight. [01:12:35.980 --> 01:12:38.180] That's why it's important that you learn how to do this. [01:12:38.180 --> 01:12:43.020] That's why it's important you don't trust an attorney who will do nothing but lie to [01:12:43.020 --> 01:12:46.260] you and throw you under the bus. [01:12:46.260 --> 01:12:51.380] Now, here's something I did not get to tell you last Monday because I wasn't able to do [01:12:51.380 --> 01:12:52.460] the show last Monday. [01:12:52.460 --> 01:12:57.140] I wound up with a respiratory infection from a case of acid reflux. [01:12:57.140 --> 01:13:01.700] I had a dinner that was a lot spicier than it appeared to be when I consumed it, and [01:13:01.700 --> 01:13:03.900] it got to me a lot later. [01:13:03.900 --> 01:13:14.620] But anyway, that aside, Monday, I got a case or helped get a case that has been going on [01:13:14.620 --> 01:13:20.260] for over five years. [01:13:20.260 --> 01:13:29.700] It is a felony drug possession case, and it's against a young lady in San Antonio. [01:13:29.700 --> 01:13:33.900] What happened was that there, and I told you all about this case before on the show and [01:13:33.900 --> 01:13:39.940] all the sways, they were messing up at the time, but now we've got an even better thing [01:13:39.940 --> 01:13:42.380] going on here. [01:13:42.380 --> 01:13:47.300] But the San Antonio Police Department was working with a confidential informant and using that [01:13:47.300 --> 01:13:54.580] confidential informant to plant humongous amounts of drugs on persons via their cars [01:13:54.580 --> 01:14:01.380] or in their homes, and then informing on those people so the police could get a warrant and [01:14:01.380 --> 01:14:08.140] raid their house or their car, and when they did, they would go to directly where this [01:14:08.140 --> 01:14:12.740] large box of contraband was left hidden in the house. [01:14:12.740 --> 01:14:19.460] Now, how would the cops know where to go without going to any other part of the house and doing [01:14:19.460 --> 01:14:25.180] any kind of search if it was not for the fact that the confidential informant knew exactly [01:14:25.180 --> 01:14:29.260] where to tell them to find it, okay? [01:14:29.260 --> 01:14:33.220] That's a big red flag right there. [01:14:33.220 --> 01:14:38.460] Cops have never been there, they conduct absolutely no search, they walk into the front door, [01:14:38.460 --> 01:14:43.020] save a warrant around, don't let anybody read the warrant, but then they go to the exact [01:14:43.020 --> 01:14:49.220] room, the exact place, to the exact box that contains the drugs that were planted by their [01:14:49.220 --> 01:14:54.700] confidential informant and then charge the homeowner with a legal possession of over [01:14:54.700 --> 01:15:01.740] 400 grams of methamphetamine. [01:15:01.740 --> 01:15:08.060] This would have sent this girl to prison for 15 or more years, ruined her life forever [01:15:08.060 --> 01:15:09.620] with a felony conviction. [01:15:09.620 --> 01:15:15.100] Hang on just a minute and we will get to more of this on the other side, y'all hang [01:15:15.100 --> 01:15:16.100] on. [01:15:16.100 --> 01:15:19.100] By the way, 512-646-1984. [01:15:19.100 --> 01:15:31.900] It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number, [01:15:31.900 --> 01:15:35.500] and date of birth, but you should think twice before giving away your personal data. [01:15:35.500 --> 01:15:39.100] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll see more in just a moment. [01:16:06.500 --> 01:16:10.260] StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:16:10.260 --> 01:16:14.980] Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere, but just because a piece of paper asks for information [01:16:14.980 --> 01:16:16.500] doesn't mean you have to give it. [01:16:16.500 --> 01:16:21.740] I lay blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write N slash A for not applicable and [01:16:21.740 --> 01:16:23.820] usually nobody notices or cares. [01:16:23.820 --> 01:16:28.380] I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory [01:16:28.380 --> 01:16:32.700] for employment or government requirement, and I won't give my phone number to a company [01:16:32.700 --> 01:16:36.860] or an organization unless I actually want them to call me, and that's pretty rare. [01:16:36.860 --> 01:16:41.980] To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests. [01:16:41.980 --> 01:16:45.740] It's like exercising a muscle, it gets easier the more you do it. [01:16:45.740 --> 01:16:49.740] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:16:58.740 --> 01:16:59.740] I lost my son. [01:16:59.740 --> 01:17:00.740] My nephew. [01:17:00.740 --> 01:17:01.740] My uncle. [01:17:01.740 --> 01:17:02.740] My uncle. [01:17:02.740 --> 01:17:03.740] My nephew. [01:17:03.740 --> 01:17:04.740] My son. [01:17:04.740 --> 01:17:05.740] Go to buildingwhat.org. [01:17:05.740 --> 01:17:33.740] Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do. [01:17:33.740 --> 01:17:40.740] If we are to be in public service in America, we live in a free society and we're going [01:17:40.740 --> 01:17:47.740] to have to stand and defend our own rights. [01:17:47.740 --> 01:17:54.740] Among those rights, the right to act in our own private capacity and, most importantly, [01:17:54.740 --> 01:17:57.740] the right to do process of law. [01:17:57.740 --> 01:18:00.720] comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what the [01:18:00.720 --> 01:18:04.500] process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of [01:18:04.500 --> 01:18:08.060] this valuable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your [01:18:08.060 --> 01:18:11.260] copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas [01:18:11.260 --> 01:18:14.660] Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original [01:18:14.660 --> 01:18:18.220] 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource [01:18:18.220 --> 01:18:21.020] material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material [01:18:21.020 --> 01:18:25.140] from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have free [01:18:25.140 --> 01:18:28.580] society we all want and deserve. [01:18:28.580 --> 01:18:48.580] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at MilogosRadioNetwork.com [01:18:58.580 --> 01:19:12.260] Alright folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio. Let's see, we got about a half an hour left calling [01:19:12.260 --> 01:19:18.660] number 512-646-1984. If I cannot get Olivier to come on here and talk, [01:19:18.660 --> 01:19:29.380] Olivier are you there? Hey, there's a blast from the past. I'm glad to hear [01:19:29.380 --> 01:19:33.460] you're alive and well. I've been wondering about you for weeks and weeks [01:19:33.460 --> 01:19:36.860] wondering what the hell happened to you man because we ain't heard nothing out [01:19:36.860 --> 01:19:45.580] of you in what three years? Yeah, working the bugs out figuring out how to work [01:19:45.580 --> 01:19:52.860] with the court tonight. Through all the movements and everything that I've been [01:19:52.860 --> 01:20:00.780] going through, I wanted to talk to you about the, it's called the [01:20:00.780 --> 01:20:10.860] Territory Judgment. Right. I wrote a suit in the federal court about the [01:20:10.860 --> 01:20:17.180] Territory Judgment and I got just, I got word back from the court you know I [01:20:17.180 --> 01:20:22.700] wrote it, I wrote certain things wrong or but as I was reading I thought it was a [01:20:22.700 --> 01:20:29.380] dismissal but it was, I realized that it was more of an instruction on how to [01:20:29.380 --> 01:20:35.980] correct. Right and then through that instruction on how to correct it led me [01:20:35.980 --> 01:20:43.340] through the, it led me through the, the Territory Judgment and I didn't realize [01:20:43.340 --> 01:20:49.860] that there was two levels of it and now that it sent me directly into that [01:20:49.860 --> 01:20:54.380] direction because I was trying to use the federal suit to a federal, the [01:20:54.380 --> 01:20:59.660] Territory Judgment to stop something that occurs through the state and they [01:20:59.660 --> 01:21:03.500] were telling me that they didn't have jurisdiction. The only jurisdiction that [01:21:03.500 --> 01:21:08.060] they had was to, they do have a jurisdiction to clarify but since I [01:21:08.060 --> 01:21:14.660] wanted, I wanted them to act in another manner that it would be, there would be [01:21:14.660 --> 01:21:21.580] interjected in the state's right to address constitutional questions. Right. [01:21:21.580 --> 01:21:27.460] So once I realized that, so when, then I went and studied the state that's the [01:21:27.460 --> 01:21:32.660] Territory Judgment and then I realized like the state the Territory Judgment is [01:21:32.660 --> 01:21:42.300] a lot more intrusive and a lot more powerful than the federal so. Well yeah, [01:21:42.300 --> 01:21:46.700] the federal, the federal can only intercede when there's a federal issue in [01:21:46.700 --> 01:21:51.060] the case. There has to be a federal question before the federal courts have [01:21:51.060 --> 01:21:55.940] any way to get into it and the thing about it is, like I told people before, [01:21:55.940 --> 01:22:03.860] the federal constitution is the floor of your rights. It's the point no one can [01:22:03.860 --> 01:22:13.620] go below but the state constitution is the ceiling. Okay, in the state no one [01:22:13.620 --> 01:22:20.380] can go below the ceiling instead of the floor. See what I'm saying? So your state [01:22:20.380 --> 01:22:25.900] remedy under your state constitution versus your state laws is always more [01:22:25.900 --> 01:22:29.380] intrusive and more powerful than it would be at the federal level for the [01:22:29.380 --> 01:22:38.700] same thing. Right, so okay, but now I'm going through this now realizing like [01:22:38.700 --> 01:22:49.660] okay, but through learning how to do this is I'm learning that the other through [01:22:49.660 --> 01:22:56.340] the Declaratory Judgment there's other things that can be that people can [01:22:56.340 --> 01:23:01.780] address legal issues that they can address through the Declaratory Judgment [01:23:01.780 --> 01:23:11.420] and still get a result that is meaningful. Yeah, favorable to the outcome [01:23:11.420 --> 01:23:17.540] they desire. Right, and I've been reading a lot of the appellate decisions on the [01:23:17.540 --> 01:23:24.460] Declaratory Judgment is as far as floor they are very thorough about void [01:23:24.460 --> 01:23:29.420] for vagueness and void statutes and things like that. If you have your marbles [01:23:29.420 --> 01:23:37.100] lined up they're ruling in favor so I'm getting prepared to file a void [01:23:37.100 --> 01:23:48.460] for vagueness on the phase to maintain lane and a driver's license statute. One [01:23:48.460 --> 01:23:53.540] of the federal courts wrote me back. Federal judges wrote me back and stated [01:23:53.540 --> 01:24:03.260] that one of my issue was the Florida commercial the Florida suspended [01:24:03.260 --> 01:24:09.580] commercial driver's license statute was infringing on my personal right on my [01:24:09.580 --> 01:24:15.260] personal security and the way he wrote it he made it he made it known that this [01:24:15.260 --> 01:24:22.740] is an issue but because I asked for the injunction right they cannot move [01:24:22.740 --> 01:24:29.340] forward because the state was the one or the state is a proper avenue for the [01:24:29.340 --> 01:24:35.700] injunction. Right, so you have to use a state course to block the agency's [01:24:35.700 --> 01:24:43.540] enforcement of a law that violates your rights. Right, so and in that sense like [01:24:43.540 --> 01:24:48.060] all the arguments that people are making and you got a problem with the public [01:24:48.060 --> 01:24:53.340] officials and all this other stuff if they really use but look at the [01:24:53.340 --> 01:24:59.820] declares for a judgment they can find a way because there's it says that any [01:24:59.820 --> 01:25:06.220] contract of you should read the statute it shows that there's any contract or [01:25:06.220 --> 01:25:12.820] anything that's disputable or a right that is need to be clarified can be [01:25:12.820 --> 01:25:20.380] brought up in that suit and once it's clarified it is binding it's lost. Right, [01:25:20.380 --> 01:25:28.380] so I'm wondering like if we understood if like that's the key if we understood to [01:25:28.380 --> 01:25:35.420] beating them up or getting something changed or a difference instead [01:25:35.420 --> 01:25:41.420] of just arguing and bringing up an issue if we sat down and thought about it [01:25:41.420 --> 01:25:48.220] clearly and then went through the declaratory judgment to our act of the [01:25:48.220 --> 01:25:54.660] state and then pulled out the pulled out the questions and the right and you [01:25:54.660 --> 01:25:59.580] know what is not being followed and put it before the courts properly I don't [01:25:59.580 --> 01:26:06.380] think they have a they have no way out it just that we as people are not educated [01:26:06.380 --> 01:26:12.620] on the process and what it entails or what that would be correct you would be [01:26:12.620 --> 01:26:20.420] absolutely right so we that's that's what I keep telling people they're [01:26:20.420 --> 01:26:25.020] looking for these silver bullet fixes to the problem there isn't one there is a [01:26:25.020 --> 01:26:30.780] fix but the fix requires you to actually know and understand something not just [01:26:30.780 --> 01:26:36.340] make crap up out of thin air and that's one of the reasons why I'm so glad [01:26:36.340 --> 01:26:41.540] you're out there you are proof positive that the information we provide not [01:26:41.540 --> 01:26:51.020] only works but that people can use it to do everything that you've done because [01:26:51.020 --> 01:26:56.500] without a doubt you have accomplished more than any other single person I know [01:26:56.500 --> 01:27:00.660] in fighting back against this crap in your states the two you've been in to [01:27:00.660 --> 01:27:11.300] handle these issues and I mean tell tell me right or wrong did we provide the [01:27:11.300 --> 01:27:17.620] information necessary for you to get that far right and did we help you by [01:27:17.620 --> 01:27:24.020] answering questions and did we answer them correctly yeah [01:27:24.860 --> 01:27:29.020] yeah and that means you've been in the fight this whole time still going right [01:27:29.020 --> 01:27:38.620] yeah there you go people what more do you want out there we do our best to [01:27:38.620 --> 01:27:43.340] help everybody we can but so many people just don't want to listen or don't want [01:27:43.340 --> 01:27:47.340] to take it upon themselves to be responsible people for their own [01:27:47.340 --> 01:27:53.820] actions in their own welfare why is that what can you tell me because I can't [01:27:53.820 --> 01:27:59.580] figure it out well what I've noticed going through this whole process is that [01:27:59.580 --> 01:28:11.540] the IQ level of a normal individual is not going to allow them to complete the [01:28:11.540 --> 01:28:16.980] task at hand they've made the legal justice system so convoluted and [01:28:16.980 --> 01:28:23.300] complex that someone who's trying to take care of the family you pay to build [01:28:23.300 --> 01:28:28.500] you know get things together and live or not like it doesn't have time to do [01:28:28.500 --> 01:28:34.620] that they're halfway fried before they get down to reading rules to some court [01:28:34.620 --> 01:28:39.020] you know the procedures are getting in the way like these are [01:28:39.020 --> 01:28:44.100] statistical things that we're not realizing be prepared for because our [01:28:44.100 --> 01:28:49.060] parents is not teachers by hate they're going to try to take over our court [01:28:49.060 --> 01:28:54.020] systems these little rules no one that wasn't expressed so we were there's a [01:28:54.020 --> 01:29:02.340] big gap in between that hey we're in a war and where we're actually free yeah [01:29:02.340 --> 01:29:06.500] and the thing is is when people don't want to take the responsibility to try [01:29:06.500 --> 01:29:12.340] to change that about themselves how do you help them at that point they're the [01:29:12.340 --> 01:29:15.860] ones that fall back and just start complaining about how corrupt and bad [01:29:15.860 --> 01:29:18.900] the system is but they don't see that they're the reason it gets to stay that [01:29:18.900 --> 01:29:24.060] way hang on man let me take this other break it won't be right back [01:29:26.900 --> 01:29:32.140] through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the [01:29:32.140 --> 01:29:36.540] area of nutrition people feed their pets better than they feed themselves and [01:29:36.540 --> 01:29:41.540] it's time we changed all that our primary defense against aging and disease in [01:29:41.540 --> 01:29:46.540] this toxic environment is good nutrition in a world where natural foods have been [01:29:46.540 --> 01:29:51.780] irradiated adulterated and mutilated young Jevity can provide the nutrients [01:29:51.780 --> 01:29:56.260] you need logos radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of [01:29:56.260 --> 01:30:02.020] products most of which we reject we have come to trust Jevity so much we became [01:30:02.020 --> 01:30:07.420] a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones Ben Fuchs and many others when you [01:30:07.420 --> 01:30:13.180] order from logos radio network calm your health will improve as you help support [01:30:13.180 --> 01:30:18.020] quality radio as you realize the benefits of young Jevity you may want to [01:30:18.020 --> 01:30:22.780] join us as a distributor you can experience improved health help your [01:30:22.780 --> 01:30:29.180] friends and family and increase your income order now are you the plaintiff [01:30:29.180 --> 01:30:33.700] or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary [01:30:33.700 --> 01:30:40.140] the affordable easy to understand for CD course that will show you how in 24 [01:30:40.140 --> 01:30:46.420] hours step-by-step you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if [01:30:46.420 --> 01:30:50.900] you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have [01:30:50.900 --> 01:30:54.860] one with our step-by-step course and now you can too [01:30:54.860 --> 01:31:00.060] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning [01:31:00.060 --> 01:31:04.780] experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone [01:31:04.780 --> 01:31:09.540] should understand about the principles and practices that control our American [01:31:09.540 --> 01:31:15.620] courts you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for [01:31:15.620 --> 01:31:21.900] civil cases pro se tactics and much more please visit rule of law radio calm [01:31:21.900 --> 01:31:29.300] and click on the banner are called toll-free 866 law easy [01:31:29.300 --> 01:31:39.700] on the day I was born on the floor got around the gates and wide wonder at the [01:31:39.700 --> 01:31:46.260] joy they have found the nurse folk up to leave this world [01:31:46.260 --> 01:31:52.460] you can tell right away all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio we [01:31:52.460 --> 01:31:56.260] are now in the final segment of tonight's show and we are still talking with [01:31:56.260 --> 01:32:01.460] Olivier and well let's say you're in Florida now aren't you Olivier yes sir [01:32:01.460 --> 01:32:05.140] all right so we'll have to get that updated because you still shows you [01:32:05.140 --> 01:32:13.060] Tennessee on the callboard but we'll get that updated all right so for what [01:32:13.060 --> 01:32:18.220] you've been working on you're going against you said the driver's license [01:32:18.220 --> 01:32:24.420] statute and what else they'll they put that they have with this thing called [01:32:24.420 --> 01:32:28.740] failure to maintain lane with right and that's the essence they'll just charge [01:32:28.740 --> 01:32:35.220] anyone with that just to give them a reason to stop you pull you over right [01:32:35.220 --> 01:32:42.060] what you don't what it doesn't show is all the requirements and the proper [01:32:42.060 --> 01:32:49.860] statutory regulations that it needs to be constitutional so another part of the [01:32:49.860 --> 01:32:56.180] puzzle that I wanted to tell everyone about the dept. or judgment [01:32:56.180 --> 01:33:02.660] dept. or judgment is the vehicle to get into the course but the secret that I [01:33:02.660 --> 01:33:08.860] found is the voice of vagueness there's a voice of vagueness concept where the [01:33:08.860 --> 01:33:16.620] legislature or we never have it whoever's right in this ordinance has a duty to [01:33:16.620 --> 01:33:22.220] write it constitutionally and what you understand of voice of vagueness there's [01:33:22.220 --> 01:33:29.780] a whole bunch of things that can find it voice of vagueness language over [01:33:29.780 --> 01:33:36.620] broadest like the range of authority that they're given to the officials is [01:33:36.620 --> 01:33:44.140] over broad it covers constitutional protected right so if it doesn't have [01:33:44.140 --> 01:33:54.580] language in the statute to explain to the people who are authorized to manage [01:33:54.580 --> 01:34:00.140] that statute what is illegal and what is not who has rights and who don't it's [01:34:00.140 --> 01:34:07.620] automatically voice of vagueness but there's plenty of reasons to find a [01:34:07.620 --> 01:34:13.180] statute voice of vagueness yeah the courts avoid them like the plague if it [01:34:13.180 --> 01:34:17.500] all possible keep that in mind a court will always try to find a way to read a [01:34:17.500 --> 01:34:23.620] statute that prevents them from having to avoid it always keep that in mind [01:34:23.620 --> 01:34:28.980] right so be prepared for any argument they would make to say why it should not [01:34:28.980 --> 01:34:33.940] be avoided because it will happen and I understand the point you're making about [01:34:33.940 --> 01:34:38.260] that because that's exactly the problem with the driver's licensing statute here [01:34:38.260 --> 01:34:43.900] in Texas the original statutes only contain three forms of actual licenses [01:34:43.900 --> 01:34:48.460] operators commercial operators and show first those three forms of licenses no [01:34:48.460 --> 01:34:53.140] longer exist in the current code and that wasn't because the code was amended [01:34:53.140 --> 01:34:58.340] to make them something else they just completely left them out entirely when [01:34:58.340 --> 01:35:04.900] they rewrote the code what they did was then substitute the temporary names that [01:35:04.900 --> 01:35:11.660] were used for those license in the original law as the new licenses there [01:35:11.660 --> 01:35:16.420] is no longer an operators and show first and a commercial operators there's now [01:35:16.420 --> 01:35:20.980] just a driver's license that only references license issued in their [01:35:20.980 --> 01:35:29.860] temporary form as they used to exist and every license is currently in Texas law [01:35:29.860 --> 01:35:35.780] it's illegal for someone to apply for if you look at what the paperwork says [01:35:35.780 --> 01:35:43.420] applying for a Texas driver's license by not being some specific legal type of [01:35:43.420 --> 01:35:49.900] individual is a crime and the law makes it very clear they can throw you in jail [01:35:49.900 --> 01:35:54.380] for that crime and then they tell you you have to go commit it by filling out the [01:35:54.380 --> 01:35:59.780] application and getting a license that doesn't exist there's a problem here [01:35:59.780 --> 01:36:05.180] you see right yeah right but if you write it in the correct language just [01:36:05.180 --> 01:36:09.060] just in the fact that though the thing that I realized going through all these [01:36:09.060 --> 01:36:16.820] cases I realized you are saying right to travel and all these other things but [01:36:16.820 --> 01:36:23.460] it's actually the right to use the right to use a automobile on the on the public [01:36:23.460 --> 01:36:29.740] roads and highway yeah it's a it's a right to personal locomotion for private [01:36:29.740 --> 01:36:33.780] business and pleasure is how the original court case decided but you're [01:36:33.780 --> 01:36:38.220] right it could be almost anything else but it's never been a right to travel [01:36:38.220 --> 01:36:42.620] issue I've said that God knows how many times on this show correct and then that [01:36:42.620 --> 01:36:48.380] that's another thing that I've noticed that we have there's a whole bunch of [01:36:48.380 --> 01:36:54.100] rights that are not written down that none of our rights are written down [01:36:54.100 --> 01:36:58.740] that's that's the that's the amazing thing here okay the Constitution is not [01:36:58.740 --> 01:37:03.500] the source of our rights and just because it enumerated some it did not [01:37:03.500 --> 01:37:12.340] invalidate others that existed whether it enumerated the others or not right so [01:37:12.340 --> 01:37:16.860] it went when I when I realized that and I added it to the equation and I [01:37:16.860 --> 01:37:22.700] realized like this is very dangerous now that I know that our rights are not just [01:37:22.700 --> 01:37:26.460] written down there they are right if you feel like there's something that you [01:37:26.460 --> 01:37:31.500] you could do you're supposed to be able to do that's not harming someone else you [01:37:31.500 --> 01:37:38.220] have the you have the right to have that legally contested against any statute [01:37:38.220 --> 01:37:44.820] municipal code anything yeah absolutely I mean it astounds me when these idiot [01:37:44.820 --> 01:37:48.340] attorneys say well the Constitution doesn't say you have that right no slash [01:37:48.340 --> 01:37:53.460] dude the Constitution is not the source of my rights it doesn't speak to what my [01:37:53.460 --> 01:37:58.380] rights are it speaks to what rights of mine you are not allowed to interfere [01:37:58.380 --> 01:38:03.500] with in any way shape or form and it does not by enumerating those specific [01:38:03.500 --> 01:38:10.580] ones authorize you to violate any of the ones that aren't listed right no one [01:38:10.580 --> 01:38:14.140] says that to the stupid attorneys or judges that comes back with that report [01:38:14.140 --> 01:38:21.220] nobody then they should but you know what through listening to your shows I [01:38:21.220 --> 01:38:28.340] learned to bypass all that because I realized that if I'm being deceived with [01:38:28.340 --> 01:38:32.460] the education that I'm given then I realized that the education that they [01:38:32.460 --> 01:38:36.100] were given they only can see things in a certain way if they don't already know [01:38:36.100 --> 01:38:43.100] that they're doing something wrong so I use that to bypass it and focus on [01:38:43.100 --> 01:38:49.100] exactly what I'm trying to address and and deal with the courts because I [01:38:49.100 --> 01:38:54.980] realized what they say and how you feel doesn't matter [01:38:55.340 --> 01:39:02.420] yeah exactly so that's the other thing feelings aren't going to get you anywhere [01:39:02.420 --> 01:39:07.820] you've got to be able to support your position in other ways right so I really [01:39:07.820 --> 01:39:11.900] thank y'all and I know every time I speak to someone and I you know express [01:39:11.900 --> 01:39:17.900] myself they tell me that you said I'm out this world and it couldn't I couldn't [01:39:17.900 --> 01:39:22.140] done it without listening to your shows and going to jail a couple times [01:39:22.140 --> 01:39:28.580] learning the hard way but I need so I can you know extremely later pathway for [01:39:28.580 --> 01:39:33.860] everyone else now well good I'm sorry as always that anyone has to suffer through [01:39:33.860 --> 01:39:38.260] that to get their point made but sometimes learning experiences are not [01:39:38.260 --> 01:39:45.100] easy experiences right and yeah so and now I know that you know there's a gap [01:39:45.100 --> 01:39:50.500] and I need to reach down to the younger generation and passes on like hey it is [01:39:50.500 --> 01:39:57.500] our responsibility to keep them in line our our forefathers did not do that [01:39:57.500 --> 01:40:02.500] because they did not educate themselves enough they did not put their cells in [01:40:02.500 --> 01:40:08.660] action enough and in the problem manner to you know stop we have all the two [01:40:08.660 --> 01:40:14.500] that we need to stop them we just not doing I just realized it's like wow yeah [01:40:14.500 --> 01:40:19.540] you're right and there they're in lies the problem we aren't doing enough for [01:40:19.540 --> 01:40:21.980] ourselves [01:40:21.980 --> 01:40:28.060] so I'm going as soon as I get this written up and everything I guess I'm [01:40:28.060 --> 01:40:34.620] just copy of it so all right if anybody else wants to look at it and get [01:40:34.620 --> 01:40:39.580] together figure out what they need to do because you can tag all the issues that [01:40:39.580 --> 01:40:44.740] you people complain about you just have to reach to figure it in your head alright [01:40:44.740 --> 01:40:50.460] or duty or whatever that's you you're the one in control it's like well I tell [01:40:50.460 --> 01:40:55.340] you what I'll do Olivier if you'll write up some sort of small description of [01:40:55.340 --> 01:40:59.300] what what it is this document is supposed to be accomplishing and why and [01:40:59.300 --> 01:41:03.180] send me that description and a copy of that document I'll put it up on the [01:41:03.180 --> 01:41:12.740] legal blog in an article okay all right and that way it's available to as many [01:41:12.740 --> 01:41:16.580] people as want to go see it and you can just send them to Tower of Law and I'll [01:41:16.580 --> 01:41:19.820] send you an email back telling you exactly what the name and the link to the [01:41:19.820 --> 01:41:23.740] article is so they can pull it up you can email to whoever you want or you can [01:41:23.740 --> 01:41:27.460] tell them to go look here for an article with this title and you'll find it in [01:41:27.460 --> 01:41:33.980] everything the documents there that work okay yeah all right [01:41:33.980 --> 01:41:40.700] okay no problem man appreciate you you take good care and you stay fighting [01:41:40.700 --> 01:41:46.460] don't let them get the best of you all right well all right take care man but [01:41:46.460 --> 01:41:52.860] like all right I got about two minutes John can you get your question asked in [01:41:52.860 --> 01:41:59.260] two minutes I certainly can thank you very kindly okay good shot you sue can [01:41:59.260 --> 01:42:04.780] you help me sue a robo-caller who's constantly calling me three four and five [01:42:04.780 --> 01:42:10.700] times a day to sell me some insurance policy on my household appliances or my [01:42:10.700 --> 01:42:16.020] car and they here's the problem with the robo-caller have you tracked down the [01:42:16.020 --> 01:42:21.820] robo-caller yes oh and they they they exist it's I guess it's a legal entity [01:42:21.820 --> 01:42:26.020] it really is a company and they they robo-call all the time and I got a record [01:42:26.020 --> 01:42:30.340] of it on my phone they call it sometimes two three and four times a day maybe five [01:42:30.340 --> 01:42:36.100] okay are you going to go after them under federal or state law hmm which would [01:42:36.100 --> 01:42:40.220] you suggest I mean well that depends did you put yourself on the national do not [01:42:40.220 --> 01:42:45.220] call list yes I did then you would do it under federal law because it's a [01:42:45.220 --> 01:42:52.020] national list your state wouldn't be able to cover a national list right okay [01:42:52.020 --> 01:42:57.700] now okay so you need to read and learn the federal telephony act which goes [01:42:57.700 --> 01:43:02.540] with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act as well okay now Fair Debt [01:43:02.540 --> 01:43:07.140] Collection Practices Act I'm I'm trained in I used to be a debt collector [01:43:07.140 --> 01:43:14.180] so okay but the telephony act can go hand in hand with that if these callers are [01:43:14.180 --> 01:43:19.380] hitting you up for debt collection on the phone the same thing would apply if [01:43:19.380 --> 01:43:26.900] they're using it for do not calls okay so federal telephones yeah look look at [01:43:26.900 --> 01:43:31.340] the federal do not call registry and see what laws it specifically says [01:43:31.340 --> 01:43:36.140] governs people who violate the do not call registry then you'll know what laws [01:43:36.140 --> 01:43:41.060] you need to become proficient in but I'm pretty sure it's going to refer you [01:43:41.060 --> 01:43:48.380] back to the telephony okay okay all right thank you very much you're welcome [01:43:48.380 --> 01:43:52.020] you take care man all right folks that has been the Monday night rule of law [01:43:52.020 --> 01:43:55.820] radio show with your host Eddie Craig I hope everybody had a good time listen [01:43:55.820 --> 01:44:00.780] tonight and y'all take care and please keep up the financial support for the [01:44:00.780 --> 01:44:04.860] network and the donations they're what keeps us going and what helps us live to [01:44:04.860 --> 01:44:09.900] bring this information to you without you we can't be here so everybody take [01:44:09.900 --> 01:44:15.140] care have a good night God bless and have a great week [01:44:16.580 --> 01:44:22.460] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called [01:44:22.460 --> 01:44:26.980] the New Testament recovery version the New Testament recovery version has over [01:44:26.980 --> 01:44:32.460] 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse helping you to [01:44:32.460 --> 01:44:37.340] know God and to know the meaning of life order your free copy today from Bibles [01:44:37.340 --> 01:44:46.820] for America call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org [01:44:46.820 --> 01:44:52.220] this translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross [01:44:52.220 --> 01:44:57.380] references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible this [01:44:57.380 --> 01:45:01.980] is truly a Bible you can understand to get your free copy of the New Testament [01:45:01.980 --> 01:45:12.780] recovery version call us toll free at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit [01:45:12.780 --> 01:45:32.140] us online at bfa.org looking for some truth you found it logosradionetwork.com