[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.400]  silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude
[00:21.400 --> 00:29.720]  $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.720 --> 00:41.440]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.440 --> 00:52.360]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.360 --> 00:57.800]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade, killing
[00:57.800 --> 01:04.800]  the 10 and entering 40.
[01:04.800 --> 01:09.480]  And recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing heaven to
[01:09.480 --> 01:14.280]  tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin,
[01:14.280 --> 01:18.880]  San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones
[01:18.880 --> 01:22.840]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to
[01:22.840 --> 01:27.840]  test the herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier
[01:27.840 --> 01:32.560]  this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases
[01:32.560 --> 01:33.560]  because of the law.
[01:33.560 --> 01:37.640]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter
[01:37.640 --> 01:42.160]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.160 --> 01:48.280]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as
[01:48.280 --> 01:54.520]  well as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.520 --> 01:59.000]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:59.000 --> 02:01.880]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.880 --> 02:06.800]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.800 --> 02:11.280]  in Harris County who stated that quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something
[02:11.280 --> 02:13.520]  illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.520 --> 02:17.400]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.400 --> 02:22.640]  charged with.
[02:22.640 --> 02:27.440]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark.
[02:27.440 --> 02:32.360]  As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.360 --> 02:38.040]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.040 --> 02:39.040]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.040 --> 02:44.200]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near its
[02:44.200 --> 02:51.200]  front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[04:14.200 --> 04:24.200]  This is a paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[04:44.200 --> 04:55.200]  in the Gulf of Mexico.
[04:55.200 --> 05:16.200]  This is a paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[05:16.200 --> 05:31.200]  in the Gulf of Mexico.
[05:31.200 --> 05:57.200]  This is a paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[05:57.200 --> 06:23.200]  in the Gulf of Mexico.
[06:23.200 --> 06:49.200]  This is a paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[06:49.200 --> 07:18.200]  in the Gulf of Mexico.
[07:18.200 --> 07:28.200]  So I talked to the some of the leaders and Tuesdays a week ago, I did a presentation to them.
[07:28.200 --> 07:29.200]  They liked it.
[07:29.200 --> 07:38.200]  We set up three consecutive presentations to kind of present what we do here on the show.
[07:38.200 --> 07:52.200]  But before the next Tuesday, the head of this group, Amon Bundy was arrested in Bixby, Idaho.
[07:52.200 --> 08:01.200]  So instead of doing the second in the three part series I had planned, I was going to
[08:01.200 --> 08:08.200]  talk about running the routine on these guys, how to set them up and how to walk your way
[08:08.200 --> 08:09.200]  through the system.
[08:09.200 --> 08:11.200]  We talk about this on the show a lot.
[08:11.200 --> 08:23.200]  So it was an opportunity instead of talking about how to set these guys up, we were able
[08:23.200 --> 08:31.200]  to kind of brainstorm on actually setting them up.
[08:31.200 --> 08:39.200]  Apparently, Mr. Bundy came to court on a summons, refused to wear a mask.
[08:39.200 --> 08:44.200]  They held him outside the court until the time for courts passed.
[08:44.200 --> 08:46.200]  The judge issued a warrant.
[08:46.200 --> 08:50.200]  Then they came, they wouldn't let him in without a mask.
[08:50.200 --> 08:56.200]  So once the time was up, they issued a warrant, arrested him and drug him in without a mask.
[08:56.200 --> 09:04.200]  But it seems that a Supreme Court justice in Idaho had forbade the courts to require
[09:04.200 --> 09:09.200]  masks prior to this event.
[09:09.200 --> 09:15.200]  They were trying to punish him and they set him up and there was a whole group of people
[09:15.200 --> 09:20.200]  out there and apparently the police came out and started pushing them to get them away from
[09:20.200 --> 09:21.200]  the courthouse.
[09:21.200 --> 09:27.200]  They pushed an older man with Parkinson's disease and he almost fell and he grabbed the
[09:27.200 --> 09:33.200]  officer's arm to keep from falling and they charged him with felony aggravated assault.
[09:33.200 --> 09:46.200]  So I've asked everyone there, or asked these people to find everyone that was there, this is,
[09:46.200 --> 09:52.200]  I'm having a little issue today so I'm not quite as on the ball.
[09:52.200 --> 09:59.200]  People's rights.org is the group and I asked them to talk to everyone who was there and
[09:59.200 --> 10:03.200]  get written affidavits.
[10:03.200 --> 10:07.200]  Get me a statement of facts and take it down and have it notarized.
[10:07.200 --> 10:11.200]  We're starting to build an onslaught.
[10:11.200 --> 10:18.200]  We have a large number of these people who frankly when I looked at the site, I looked at the
[10:18.200 --> 10:23.200]  structure of the group, it was surprisingly well structured.
[10:23.200 --> 10:29.200]  This was not some ad hoc group that a bunch of patriots just threw together.
[10:29.200 --> 10:36.200]  This is very well structured and that's probably why they have 3,000 members around the country.
[10:36.200 --> 10:43.200]  But what they needed was some tools they could use and it was serendipitous.
[10:43.200 --> 10:47.200]  It wasn't good for Bundy that he got arrested at this time.
[10:47.200 --> 10:57.200]  This is a Bundy of the same Bundy family in Idaho that did a standoff over the government
[10:57.200 --> 11:02.200]  trying to take part of their ranch that had been in the family for 150 years.
[11:02.200 --> 11:10.200]  It wasn't good for him that he got arrested but it may at the end of the day prove good
[11:10.200 --> 11:16.200]  because first thing we were doing was preparing a habeas but then the next day he got out.
[11:16.200 --> 11:20.200]  I guess they started getting too much pressure.
[11:20.200 --> 11:25.200]  So now we really start applying the pressure.
[11:25.200 --> 11:30.200]  I'll keep everybody up to speed on how this goes.
[11:30.200 --> 11:33.200]  It should get very interesting.
[11:33.200 --> 11:42.200]  This group, what they primarily do, what their structure is is if you are a member of the group
[11:42.200 --> 11:50.200]  and you have an illegal issue, you can make a call to one of their coordinators
[11:50.200 --> 11:56.200]  and the coordinator will call other people in your area and get a whole group down there.
[11:56.200 --> 12:04.200]  Well, from my perspective that's perfect because we have people that want to do something
[12:04.200 --> 12:15.200]  and it has been my experience that the most effective people are the ringers.
[12:15.200 --> 12:22.200]  The people who are not necessarily connected, all these people outside the court
[12:22.200 --> 12:27.200]  who were there for the hearing that never happened.
[12:27.200 --> 12:31.200]  They are the most dangerous people in the neighborhood
[12:31.200 --> 12:36.200]  and apparently the sheriff's deputies come out and tried to get rid of these guys
[12:36.200 --> 12:43.200]  and gave them legal claims they can bring.
[12:43.200 --> 12:46.200]  We will bring an onslaught.
[12:46.200 --> 12:56.200]  I was already preparing a set of tools that I could use for people in Wise County, the county I live in
[12:56.200 --> 13:04.200]  who have been arrested because the arrest procedures in Wise County are just fundamentally wrong
[13:04.200 --> 13:07.200]  and absolutely illegal.
[13:07.200 --> 13:13.200]  I will start looking through the court record, pull everyone's name who's been arrested,
[13:13.200 --> 13:20.200]  file criminal charges against the arresting officer, the sheriff and everyone involved.
[13:20.200 --> 13:25.200]  A professional conduct complaints against each one involved.
[13:25.200 --> 13:33.200]  A bar grievances against the person's attorney for not challenging subject matter jurisdiction.
[13:33.200 --> 13:38.200]  Complaints against the prosecutors.
[13:38.200 --> 13:47.200]  I'm afraid Aberg is going to wind up in front of this little shiny teeth and sweet smell in armpits.
[13:47.200 --> 13:49.200]  I talked to him.
[13:49.200 --> 14:01.200]  I told him I was violating one of my rules and the rule I was violating is never give fair warning.
[14:01.200 --> 14:16.200]  But because he was there with Greg Lowry whom I hold in high regard,
[14:16.200 --> 14:20.200]  I gave him fair warning.
[14:20.200 --> 14:24.200]  I told him exactly what was wrong with their procedures.
[14:24.200 --> 14:28.200]  And what I was going to do because of what they had done wrong,
[14:28.200 --> 14:32.200]  every single prosecution in the county was illegal.
[14:32.200 --> 14:35.200]  And I was going to start filing criminal charges against all of them.
[14:35.200 --> 14:46.200]  I mean, T-Cost complaints because that would do the most harm in the long run.
[14:46.200 --> 14:48.200]  And ask him to look at the law.
[14:48.200 --> 15:00.200]  When I told him that 16.17, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure required that there be an order in the court from a magistrate.
[15:00.200 --> 15:09.200]  If there is no order filed in the court within 48 hours, the accused has a right to discharge.
[15:09.200 --> 15:11.200]  It used to say dismissal in the last change.
[15:11.200 --> 15:17.200]  They changed it to discharge, but it's originally dismissal.
[15:17.200 --> 15:25.200]  So every one of these cases, for every one of these cases, the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
[15:25.200 --> 15:32.200]  And the arrest and the imprisonment was false imprisonment for which there is no immunity.
[15:32.200 --> 15:37.200]  And then I was going to build an online set of tools with a questionnaire,
[15:37.200 --> 15:43.200]  ask the questions I need to develop the issues in the case,
[15:43.200 --> 15:50.200]  and then spit them out a lawsuit, a tort letter, everything they need to have a discussion.
[15:50.200 --> 16:00.200]  So now I have an opportunity to demonstrate to Idaho who the masters of the servants are.
[16:00.200 --> 16:04.200]  Now we have people in Idaho who can file complaints.
[16:04.200 --> 16:07.200]  And that's pretty good.
[16:07.200 --> 16:14.200]  But we have people who are not in Idaho who can file complaints.
[16:14.200 --> 16:18.200]  Something they probably haven't considered.
[16:18.200 --> 16:28.200]  When the people who were there produced these affidavits and produced all of the phone videos they took.
[16:28.200 --> 16:33.200]  Now Brett, you can look at those and have reason to believe and do believe these officers committed crimes.
[16:33.200 --> 16:35.200]  And it's your duty to report it.
[16:35.200 --> 16:37.200]  Hang on.
[16:37.200 --> 16:49.200]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser.
[16:49.200 --> 16:52.200]  We'll be taking your calls all night.
[16:52.200 --> 16:56.200]  I may spend another segment or two on this, but I think you'll like it.
[16:56.200 --> 16:58.200]  Hang on. We'll be right back.
[16:58.200 --> 17:08.200]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway.
[17:08.200 --> 17:10.200]  Sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[17:10.200 --> 17:14.200]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:14.200 --> 17:16.200]  Any amount is appreciated.
[17:16.200 --> 17:18.200]  Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[17:18.200 --> 17:24.200]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[17:24.200 --> 17:27.200]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:27.200 --> 17:30.200]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:30.200 --> 17:35.200]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[17:35.200 --> 17:39.200]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[17:39.200 --> 17:48.200]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[17:48.200 --> 17:51.200]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:51.200 --> 17:55.200]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:55.200 --> 18:00.200]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.200 --> 18:05.200]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[18:05.200 --> 18:11.200]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time.
[18:11.200 --> 18:14.200]  Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516.
[18:14.200 --> 18:21.200]  Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
[18:21.200 --> 18:26.200]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[18:26.200 --> 18:34.200]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[18:34.200 --> 18:41.200]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week.
[18:41.200 --> 18:48.200]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character development.
[18:48.200 --> 19:00.200]  So mark your calendar and join us live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[19:18.200 --> 19:43.200]  Music
[19:43.200 --> 19:45.200]  Alright, we are back.
[19:45.200 --> 19:49.200]  This is the rule of law radio. Randy Kelton. I'm Brett Fountain.
[19:49.200 --> 20:02.200]  And we are talking about what's going on in Idaho and how people can, they don't necessarily need to be in Idaho to raise a flag and say, hey, there's an issue here.
[20:02.200 --> 20:23.200]  That's in fact, I am aware of, I won't say it's me, but let's just, I'm aware of some heavy that landed on that particular court that day in the form of some hard questions and demanding records.
[20:23.200 --> 20:26.200]  So we'll see how that turns out.
[20:26.200 --> 20:35.200]  That's the first part before going into judicial misconduct and criminal complaints and all that, doing a little bit of recon.
[20:35.200 --> 20:36.200]  What do you say?
[20:36.200 --> 20:45.200]  What the code says is how a complaint is to be structured.
[20:45.200 --> 20:53.200]  Texas is the only state I've seen that stipulates what must be in a complaint.
[20:53.200 --> 20:58.200]  It says that a complaint must run in the name of the state of Texas.
[20:58.200 --> 21:08.200]  So I have some forms on the Jurisimprudence.website.
[21:08.200 --> 21:11.200]  Jurisimprudence.website.
[21:11.200 --> 21:13.200]  My tongue is getting tangled.
[21:13.200 --> 21:22.200]  Anyway, on there, under documents and research, you'll find some blank criminal complaints.
[21:22.200 --> 21:31.200]  We start out with, in the name by the authority of the state of Texas, that stipulated by a statute that needs to be there.
[21:31.200 --> 21:43.200]  Then in order for the complaint to be valid, you must state that you have reason to believe and do believe.
[21:43.200 --> 21:47.200]  And that is all that you need.
[21:47.200 --> 21:51.200]  You do not need firsthand knowledge.
[21:51.200 --> 22:05.200]  You can say your next door neighbor is a divorced female living by herself, and she sees the next door neighbor murder somebody in his backyard.
[22:05.200 --> 22:08.200]  And she's terrified of this guy.
[22:08.200 --> 22:11.200]  And she tells you about it.
[22:11.200 --> 22:29.200]  If you believe her, and she states facts, that if the facts were true, would establish a crime, and you believe what she told you, you have sufficient information to file a criminal affidavit.
[22:29.200 --> 22:35.200]  When you file a criminal affidavit, you harm no one.
[22:35.200 --> 22:43.200]  If you file an affidavit, and it's absolutely 100% wrong, you have done no harm.
[22:43.200 --> 22:52.200]  Because the way the law is constructed, the complaint is to be presented to some magistrate.
[22:52.200 --> 23:16.200]  The magistrate must look at that complaint and determine if there is sufficient evidence, if taken on its face to be true, to establish reasonable probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, and the person accused committed that crime.
[23:16.200 --> 23:26.200]  If the judge determines that this is enough to establish probable cause, and he can then issue a warrant.
[23:26.200 --> 23:34.200]  When the judge issues a warrant, something bad can happen to the accused, but you didn't do that.
[23:34.200 --> 23:37.200]  Let's be clear about what that warrant is supposed to do.
[23:37.200 --> 23:42.200]  That does not mean that the accused is supposed to go straight to jail.
[23:42.200 --> 23:50.200]  You arrest this person and bring him before me if any of you have ever received a warrant.
[23:50.200 --> 23:52.200]  Read it. That's what it'll say.
[23:52.200 --> 24:00.200]  And that's because the judge held an ex-partee examining trial, or in other states they call it a preliminary hearing.
[24:00.200 --> 24:04.200]  If a police officer wants a warrant, that's what he does.
[24:04.200 --> 24:06.200]  He takes a complaint to a magistrate.
[24:06.200 --> 24:08.200]  He doesn't take it to another police officer.
[24:08.200 --> 24:10.200]  A police officer can't issue a warrant.
[24:10.200 --> 24:13.200]  A prosecutor can't issue a warrant.
[24:13.200 --> 24:19.200]  He takes it to a magistrate because everything in law directs complaints to magistrates.
[24:19.200 --> 24:28.200]  They're the only ones who can issue a warrant where there is no case before the court already.
[24:28.200 --> 24:36.200]  A trial judge can issue a warrant, like in the case of Mr. Bundy, where he failed to appear.
[24:36.200 --> 24:42.200]  In that case, he can issue a warrant, but that's when a case has already been filed.
[24:42.200 --> 24:46.200]  When no case has been filed, there is no trial judge.
[24:46.200 --> 24:49.200]  So that's what magistrates are for.
[24:49.200 --> 24:55.200]  And they've been in place since 1215 AD since the first signing of the Magna Carta.
[24:55.200 --> 24:58.200]  It's called the Magna Carta Libertarium.
[24:58.200 --> 25:02.200]  It established liberty for British citizens.
[25:02.200 --> 25:08.200]  And the magistrate can then make a determination a probable cause.
[25:08.200 --> 25:10.200]  He may tell the officer, oh, this is a bunch of nonsense.
[25:10.200 --> 25:12.200]  You don't have enough here.
[25:12.200 --> 25:13.200]  Get out of my office.
[25:13.200 --> 25:17.200]  But if he finds sufficient evidence, then he issues a warrant.
[25:17.200 --> 25:26.200]  But he held a examining trial or a preliminary hearing exporter with only one party there.
[25:26.200 --> 25:30.200]  And the accused has certain rights and a preliminary hearing.
[25:30.200 --> 25:39.200]  So he issues a warrant and directs an officer to arrest that person and bring him before me.
[25:39.200 --> 25:42.200]  Now he gets to hear the other side.
[25:42.200 --> 25:47.200]  When he hears the other side of the story, he may toss the whole thing.
[25:47.200 --> 25:51.200]  And in every case, the court never gets jurisdiction.
[25:51.200 --> 25:55.200]  This is a primary tenet of due process.
[25:55.200 --> 26:01.200]  So, the point is, when you file a criminal complaint, you do no harm.
[26:01.200 --> 26:04.200]  You harm no one.
[26:04.200 --> 26:06.200]  Unless you lie.
[26:06.200 --> 26:10.200]  If you tell the truth as you know it.
[26:10.200 --> 26:16.200]  Even if what you're telling is that as the truth is not the truth.
[26:16.200 --> 26:25.200]  But if you had reason to believe and do believe, then you are absolutely protected.
[26:25.200 --> 26:39.200]  You can't be retaliated against without the person committing the retaliation to be subject to serious criminal prosecution.
[26:39.200 --> 26:46.200]  You can't be sued. You have the same immunity that a judge has. Absolute immunity.
[26:46.200 --> 26:51.200]  You can't be touched in order that the police can't do it all themselves.
[26:51.200 --> 26:56.200]  And they need the people to give notice of crime.
[26:56.200 --> 26:59.200]  This is how you do it.
[26:59.200 --> 27:11.200]  You can call the police, but the statutory way to do it is filing criminal affidavit with some magistrate.
[27:11.200 --> 27:16.200]  So, we all have the right to do it. We're all protected when we do it.
[27:16.200 --> 27:27.200]  And there's nothing that I've ever seen in law that restricts the filing of a criminal complaint to someone who lives in the jurisdiction or the state.
[27:27.200 --> 27:31.200]  Or even the United States.
[27:31.200 --> 27:35.200]  Anyone can file a criminal complaint.
[27:35.200 --> 27:39.200]  And they want you to. They need help.
[27:39.200 --> 27:46.200]  And because they need help, their laws are in place to prevent them from screwing around with witnesses.
[27:46.200 --> 27:50.200]  I once had a bailiff tell me, Mr. Cuffin, you need to be careful.
[27:50.200 --> 27:55.200]  You can get a lot of trouble filing those complaints. That got a 911 call.
[27:55.200 --> 27:58.200]  That was witness tampering.
[27:58.200 --> 28:03.200]  He was trying to chill my access to the magistrate by making bail threats.
[28:03.200 --> 28:08.200]  Well, he didn't construe that as a threat. He actually believed that was true.
[28:08.200 --> 28:12.200]  But it doesn't matter what he thought.
[28:12.200 --> 28:15.200]  It matters how I took what he said.
[28:15.200 --> 28:19.200]  And I took it as a threat. It's like a 911 trying to get arrested.
[28:19.200 --> 28:21.200]  That was great fun.
[28:21.200 --> 28:29.200]  And when you start filing complaints, you become the baddest motor scooter on the block.
[28:29.200 --> 28:35.200]  Everybody wants to duck and run for cover, especially if you filed it against public officials.
[28:35.200 --> 28:39.200]  Like, for instance, the judge who issued the warrant.
[28:39.200 --> 28:45.200]  The judge who ordered the police, the sheriff's deputies to hold him there outside the courtroom.
[28:45.200 --> 28:49.200]  He knew he was at the court. He knew he had appeared.
[28:49.200 --> 28:55.200]  He ordered these deputies to hold him until the clock ran and then had him arrested.
[28:55.200 --> 29:01.200]  Good luck, Judge. It's going to be an interesting ride for you.
[29:01.200 --> 29:09.200]  Brett, off the top of your head, what do we start filing against the judge?
[29:09.200 --> 29:16.200]  Well, he definitely obstructed justice. I don't know what they call that in Idaho.
[29:16.200 --> 29:21.200]  But in Texas, we have official oppression and there's two parts to that.
[29:21.200 --> 29:28.200]  One is when he didn't do what he must have done and the other is when he did do what he must not have done.
[29:28.200 --> 29:36.200]  So if we find something like that that's in Idaho offenses, I'd go with that.
[29:36.200 --> 29:40.200]  I have a look at our sponsors.
[29:40.200 --> 29:43.200]  So we might take a look at that some more.
[29:43.200 --> 29:49.200]  The criminal offenses, we've got three angles. Crimes, judicial misconduct and bar grievances.
[29:49.200 --> 29:52.200]  That judge is susceptible to everyone.
[29:52.200 --> 30:00.200]  So 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[30:00.200 --> 30:06.200]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[30:06.200 --> 30:11.200]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets.
[30:11.200 --> 30:15.200]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details.
[30:42.200 --> 30:51.200]  Data privacy is a big deal so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information.
[30:51.200 --> 30:54.200]  But what happens if it escapes their control?
[30:54.200 --> 31:03.200]  It's not an idle question. According to a recent survey, a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year.
[31:03.200 --> 31:11.200]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com. Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you.
[31:11.200 --> 31:17.200]  They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see. The cupboard would be bare.
[31:17.200 --> 31:21.200]  Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[31:21.200 --> 31:30.200]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.200 --> 31:35.200]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle on September 11th, 2001.
[31:35.200 --> 31:39.200]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[31:39.200 --> 31:43.200]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:43.200 --> 31:52.200]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[31:52.200 --> 31:56.200]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[31:56.200 --> 32:01.200]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht. More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:26.200 --> 32:35.200]  The Sheriff's Deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.200 --> 32:41.200]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.200 --> 32:48.200]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:48.200 --> 32:51.200]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:51.200 --> 32:59.200]  Now to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.200 --> 33:22.200]  Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:30.200 --> 33:37.200]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Mountain, and Rule of Law Radio.
[33:37.200 --> 33:47.200]  And before we go back in, one thing I wanted to clear up, I made a reference to this lawyer who had shiny teeth and odorless armpits.
[33:47.200 --> 34:01.200]  That's kind of an inside joke on the show because Brett here filed a information request and the custodian of the record had a lawyer respond and it was this lawyer.
[34:01.200 --> 34:06.200]  He was a lawyer for the county at the time and now he's the county attorney.
[34:06.200 --> 34:18.200]  And Brett told him to get lost because he don't deal with lawyers and he told him he's a lawyer for the clerk. He's a county judge.
[34:18.200 --> 34:26.200]  And when he called in, they complained to him about picking on this lawyer because Brett Bargreaves didn't accuse him of baritry.
[34:26.200 --> 34:37.200]  And Brett assured him he wasn't picking on the lawyer that he had shiny teeth and odorless armpits. He was just ensuring that he followed law.
[34:37.200 --> 34:40.200]  That was our little inside joke.
[34:40.200 --> 34:44.200]  I talked to the, this lawyer got appointed as the county attorney.
[34:44.200 --> 34:52.200]  The county judge passed away and the district attorney was appointed by the governor to the judges position.
[34:52.200 --> 34:58.200]  The county attorney to the district attorney's position and this guy to county attorney.
[34:58.200 --> 35:04.200]  When I mentioned that to him, he indicated that was the only Bargreaves he ever got.
[35:04.200 --> 35:06.200]  It really hurt his feelings.
[35:06.200 --> 35:08.200]  He had life and stuff.
[35:08.200 --> 35:16.200]  And I chuckled and laughed about the shiny teeth and odorless armpits and he did not find that a bit funny.
[35:16.200 --> 35:19.200]  The other, go ahead.
[35:19.200 --> 35:21.200]  He didn't think that was funny?
[35:21.200 --> 35:24.200]  No, he didn't find any humor in it at all.
[35:24.200 --> 35:30.200]  And the other thing is Snafu Radio, Scott Richardson.
[35:30.200 --> 35:36.200]  He is the one that located these people and got me in contact with them.
[35:36.200 --> 35:45.200]  And he has a YouTube, what do they call it, a location or something.
[35:45.200 --> 35:49.200]  He posts on YouTube under Snafu Radio.
[35:49.200 --> 35:51.200]  Channels.
[35:51.200 --> 35:53.200]  Channels, yeah, that's the word I was looking for.
[35:53.200 --> 35:58.200]  He has a YouTube channel and he did a lot of action on it.
[35:58.200 --> 36:01.200]  So he's been a lot of help.
[36:01.200 --> 36:11.200]  So anyway, during the break, Brett was doing some research and what did you find, Brett?
[36:11.200 --> 36:20.200]  Well, let me just start out here, kind of welcome the listeners into the process of analyzing here.
[36:20.200 --> 36:23.200]  I'm completely unfamiliar with Idaho.
[36:23.200 --> 36:26.200]  How does Idaho do laws, statues?
[36:26.200 --> 36:29.200]  Do they break up penal code from the criminal procedure?
[36:29.200 --> 36:30.200]  How is it?
[36:30.200 --> 36:35.200]  We don't know who's responsible for what, which duties are imposed, how they define their offenses.
[36:35.200 --> 36:41.200]  So I'm just going to start out here with a web search for Idaho Penal Code.
[36:41.200 --> 36:46.200]  And that lands me onto codes.findlaw.com.
[36:46.200 --> 36:53.200]  Probably if anybody's been looking at anything about law, you've been on this site before because it pops up pretty high and the search results pretty often.
[36:53.200 --> 36:58.200]  But this takes us to Idaho Statutes, Title 18, Crimes and Punishments.
[36:58.200 --> 37:02.200]  This looks like exactly where we need to drill into.
[37:02.200 --> 37:04.200]  Title 18, Crimes and Punishments.
[37:04.200 --> 37:15.200]  And we see here that Idaho has things broken out where they talk about Chapter 7, arrests and seizures of persons or property.
[37:15.200 --> 37:20.200]  We find in Chapter 9, assault and battery.
[37:20.200 --> 37:26.200]  That seems to go to what was happening that day on Tuesday, assault and battery.
[37:26.200 --> 37:31.200]  We have Chapter 17, conspiracies.
[37:31.200 --> 37:38.200]  Criminal conspiracy, the way I'm looking at this and just kind of holding the whole scene in my mind.
[37:38.200 --> 37:47.200]  And as my eyes roll across all these different things that they have codified as this is a crime, this is a...
[37:47.200 --> 37:50.200]  Wait, hold just a second.
[37:50.200 --> 37:56.200]  What Brett is referring to is Brett saw the videos of what occurred outside the jail.
[37:56.200 --> 37:58.200]  That's what he's referring to.
[37:58.200 --> 37:59.200]  Yes.
[37:59.200 --> 38:02.200]  Sorry. Yeah, I saw one video. I don't know. There's probably a lot of them.
[38:02.200 --> 38:11.200]  But the one video I saw had this scene of a bunch of police officers or some other officers and they didn't even have badges on.
[38:11.200 --> 38:17.200]  They had some kind of code numbers because they didn't want all these people standing out in front of the building to know their names.
[38:17.200 --> 38:23.200]  So they were wearing code numbers and you could hear somebody on the video that I was watching.
[38:23.200 --> 38:25.200]  What is this?
[38:25.200 --> 38:30.200]  C-437? What is that? Is that you?
[38:30.200 --> 38:33.200]  This is officer named C...
[38:33.200 --> 38:35.200]  Well, who are you?
[38:35.200 --> 38:38.200]  They wouldn't tell them their names. They wouldn't identify themselves at all.
[38:38.200 --> 38:48.200]  So that's a problem already, but let's go to the more major issues like the false imprisonment is Chapter 29 I see here.
[38:48.200 --> 39:05.200]  I see Chapter 17 conspiracies, criminal conspiracy. I'm thinking about the judge for that one because he basically drove the whole situation and told the cops what to do.
[39:05.200 --> 39:14.200]  You know, kick them out, force them to do here, make them stay here, now go arrest them because they weren't in the building yet.
[39:14.200 --> 39:22.200]  All of that stuff was driven by the judge, so we can look at criminal conspiracy.
[39:22.200 --> 39:29.200]  We have, let's see, false imprisonment was 29.
[39:29.200 --> 39:38.200]  On the break, you mentioned a Texas statute, Chapter 71 of Texas Penal Code.
[39:38.200 --> 39:45.200]  That's Texas's form of RICO. Go ahead, Brett.
[39:45.200 --> 39:50.200]  Yeah, let's take a look at that in Texas. I'll just flip over here for a moment to...
[39:50.200 --> 40:03.200]  It's in the Penal Code, Texas Penal Code, and it is Chapter 71, 022 and 023, I believe.
[40:03.200 --> 40:11.200]  Yes, 022 says, coercing, inducing, or soliciting membership in a criminal street gang.
[40:11.200 --> 40:20.200]  So that would be more like the sheriff or the police chief, whoever's recruiting members to do crimes.
[40:20.200 --> 40:32.200]  Okay, hold on a second. What earlier in the code, it defines a criminal street gang as, is it two or more people?
[40:32.200 --> 40:38.200]  Let me take a look. It says, combination, I think it's three. Let's see here.
[40:38.200 --> 40:45.200]  7101, combination means three or more persons who collaborate in carrying on criminal activities.
[40:45.200 --> 40:48.200]  So there's, there's more of that.
[40:48.200 --> 41:03.200]  Even these as criminal street gang means three or more persons having in common identifying sign or symbol that they wear on their shirt or an identifiable leadership who continuously or regularly associate in the commission of criminal activities.
[41:03.200 --> 41:07.200]  So you can't say this unless they're regularly doing it.
[41:07.200 --> 41:19.200]  And it appears as though a policing agency who regularly violates law, yes, meets the requirements of a street gang.
[41:19.200 --> 41:28.200]  Exactly. And then you have the offense of 71.023 directing activities of criminal street gangs.
[41:28.200 --> 41:34.200]  So then that's the one in charge. And this could actually be, in this case, the judge.
[41:34.200 --> 41:43.200]  You might find out if Idaho has a similar offense codified, but that's what it would be in the Texas law.
[41:43.200 --> 41:51.200]  So that's just a good little getting started on where we might look for these things.
[41:51.200 --> 41:58.200]  There's one that has to be there and that's official misconduct.
[41:58.200 --> 42:03.200]  In Texas we have two. We have official misconduct and official oppression.
[42:03.200 --> 42:21.200]  There's conduct is where you misuse public funds or public equipment, like you put gas in your private car with your state debit card.
[42:21.200 --> 42:32.200]  If you exert a purport to exert authority you don't have or fail to perform the duty you're required to perform and in the process deny citizen in a right,
[42:32.200 --> 42:39.200]  official oppression, but most states only have official misconduct and all of that's grouped into one.
[42:39.200 --> 42:50.200]  That is our catch-all. Every state has it because it reflects 18 U.S. Code 242, the Ku Klux Klan Act.
[42:50.200 --> 42:57.200]  And it pretty well covers everything.
[42:57.200 --> 43:05.200]  Whatever they do, if it's not right, you can group it under official misconduct.
[43:05.200 --> 43:07.200]  I'll shut up now.
[43:07.200 --> 43:16.200]  I was looking for Idaho. I don't see an official misconduct thing in this particular title.
[43:16.200 --> 43:34.200]  I do see some for banking and some other financial issues, but I don't see one yet that Idaho has for just generally failing or refusing to do their duties or jumping outside scope and doing whatever the heck they want.
[43:34.200 --> 43:39.200]  I don't see any of that just yet.
[43:39.200 --> 43:50.200]  Alright, so we have malicious harassment. That sounds like it could be a good fit. We have civil rights, trespass, all kinds of good stuff here.
[43:50.200 --> 44:10.200]  I guess we'll speak some more about that after our sponsors.
[44:20.200 --> 44:22.200]  How can I help Logos?
[44:22.200 --> 44:27.200]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos.
[44:27.200 --> 44:31.200]  You can order in your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[44:31.200 --> 44:37.200]  Now, go to LogosRegulnetwork.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:37.200 --> 44:43.200]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[44:43.200 --> 44:44.200]  Do I pay extra?
[44:44.200 --> 44:45.200]  No.
[44:45.200 --> 44:47.200]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[44:47.200 --> 44:48.200]  No.
[44:48.200 --> 44:49.200]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[44:49.200 --> 44:50.200]  No.
[44:50.200 --> 44:51.200]  I mean, yes.
[44:51.200 --> 44:56.200]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[44:56.200 --> 44:58.200]  We are welcome.
[44:58.200 --> 45:27.200]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[45:28.200 --> 45:54.200]  Thank you.
[45:54.200 --> 46:01.200]  Thank you.
[46:24.200 --> 46:52.200]  Thank you.
[46:52.200 --> 47:04.200]  Thank you.
[47:04.200 --> 47:06.200]  Okay. We are back.
[47:06.200 --> 47:07.200]  Rule of Law Radio.
[47:07.200 --> 47:08.200]  Randy Kilton.
[47:08.200 --> 47:09.200]  I'm Brad Fountain.
[47:09.200 --> 47:21.200]  And we're talking about a situation in Idaho where a judge decided to prevent access to the courtroom by some people that were summoned to the court.
[47:21.200 --> 47:27.200]  He prevented access because the people weren't wearing a mask of all things.
[47:27.200 --> 47:30.200]  He made them stand outside the front door.
[47:30.200 --> 47:36.200]  Then he worked up a failure to appear warrant and went out and got them and threw them in jail.
[47:36.200 --> 47:38.200]  So they didn't show up for court.
[47:38.200 --> 47:41.200]  They were standing outside. How about that?
[47:41.200 --> 47:53.200]  So we're taking a look at the Idaho Statutes in Title 18, just kind of perusing through here in crimes and punishments to see which things stand out to us as being appropriate.
[47:53.200 --> 47:58.200]  Obviously, anybody, you, me, we don't even have to have been there.
[47:58.200 --> 48:04.200]  We hear the story and we instantly have something in our gut that says, wow, that's completely not right.
[48:04.200 --> 48:06.200]  That shouldn't happen.
[48:06.200 --> 48:11.200]  I wish I knew how to not allow that. Well, that's what we're looking at right now.
[48:11.200 --> 48:13.200]  How do we not allow that?
[48:13.200 --> 48:23.200]  How do we draw the appropriate attention to the appropriate people so that this doesn't happen in the future?
[48:23.200 --> 48:31.200]  Or at least so that they are hindered in their attempts to continue this kind of lawlessness.
[48:31.200 --> 48:36.200]  So we're taking a look at Idaho Statutes, Title 18, Crimes and Punishments.
[48:36.200 --> 48:43.200]  And Randy was finding over the break. Randy found something about official misconduct.
[48:43.200 --> 48:54.200]  Like I said, so far the only thing I'm seeing is that Randy saw another one that was official misconduct, but it also has to do with financial misconduct.
[48:54.200 --> 49:07.200]  And then I noticed over here we have a Section 18-5701, Misuse of Public Monies by Public Officers and Public Employees.
[49:07.200 --> 49:15.200]  So it looks like if these folks were on the clock, they were supposed to be doing their job and following the law.
[49:15.200 --> 49:25.200]  And instead, they were running around committing crimes and violating people's rights and participating in criminal conspiracy on the clock.
[49:25.200 --> 49:33.200]  Okay, so that's two dings against them. They've done the crime and they're taking the people's money as if they're doing their job.
[49:33.200 --> 49:40.200]  So I think we can pretty well line that up for official misconduct, wouldn't you say, Randy?
[49:40.200 --> 49:43.200]  Does that seem to you like it's a good fit?
[49:43.200 --> 49:59.200]  Yes, yes. I was doing some digging and I found this lawyer's site from Idaho and he starts out with a $44,700,000 verdict in police misconduct.
[49:59.200 --> 50:05.200]  Police car chased $17,600,000 verdict.
[50:05.200 --> 50:11.200]  Police brutality, 4.1 million settlement.
[50:11.200 --> 50:18.200]  So it appears as though Idaho takes this very seriously.
[50:18.200 --> 50:23.200]  Well, good. That's really good.
[50:23.200 --> 50:29.200]  So I just found 7804. It's also in Title 18.
[50:29.200 --> 50:44.200]  Section 7804 seems like it may be connected. This is a racketeering prohibited activities. That seems sort of parallel to the directing activities of a criminal street game.
[50:44.200 --> 50:50.200]  This looks like it's a good one to put in their lap.
[50:50.200 --> 50:56.200]  Yeah, it's nice. We get to throw it at them and they have to defend themselves.
[50:56.200 --> 51:08.200]  If what we throw at them doesn't rise to the level of violation of a particular statute, let them explain that to the judge.
[51:08.200 --> 51:10.200]  So we get to file the complaints.
[51:10.200 --> 51:12.200]  Turnabout's fair play.
[51:12.200 --> 51:29.200]  So it's right that it just feels good and almost therapeutic, cathartic to you've been in the situation where you've had false accusations thrown at you or even some weird piece of paper that has weird codes and acronyms on it.
[51:29.200 --> 51:37.200]  You don't even understand what you're being accused of and you have to fight in the blind, just in the dark to try to figure out what the heck is going on.
[51:37.200 --> 51:41.200]  What are they doing to me? Why are they messing with my life?
[51:41.200 --> 51:54.200]  And so there's something kind of therapeutic about it when you are able to put the aggressors in that same kind of position.
[51:54.200 --> 51:59.200]  Who knows? Maybe it'll affect their behavior in the future.
[51:59.200 --> 52:01.200]  I do see one other thing here.
[52:01.200 --> 52:11.200]  Maybe before we go over to the colors, we're starting to get some colors on the board here, but I do see this is Chapter 78 of the Racketeering Act.
[52:11.200 --> 52:14.200]  I see Chapter 79 is malicious harassment.
[52:14.200 --> 52:19.200]  Chapter 81 is terrorist control act.
[52:19.200 --> 52:32.200]  We might check and see if these officers all standing around piles and piles of officers who won't identify themselves, but they're terrorizing the people. We might see if that lines up.
[52:32.200 --> 52:36.200]  But what do you say, Rainey? We'll go ahead and take some calls.
[52:36.200 --> 52:46.200]  Yes, let's go to Chris in Colorado. Hello, Chris. What do you have for us today?
[52:46.200 --> 52:55.200]  I have a bunch of procedural questions that I'll keep it just a couple of hopefully simple ones tonight, and one of them I think is hopefully on point for what you guys are talking about.
[52:55.200 --> 53:01.200]  So you were mentioned about going after information. I'm assuming after FOIA requests.
[53:01.200 --> 53:09.200]  I have a question about navigating a FOIA request. I have a specific instance here.
[53:09.200 --> 53:21.200]  Okay, hold on. Hold on. Hold on. You're saying FOIA. Are you referencing FOIA in the Fed or are you referencing state?
[53:21.200 --> 53:25.200]  I am assuming state. Yeah. Okay.
[53:25.200 --> 53:29.200]  One of these is a federal agency, though, so let's see.
[53:29.200 --> 53:39.200]  I'll give you an example just kind of where we are ignorantly as newbies to this. I did two FOIA requests in Chicago a couple of years ago.
[53:39.200 --> 53:50.200]  One was with the Department of Administrative Hearings and the other one was with the Chicago Police Department trying to get body cam records and et cetera.
[53:50.200 --> 54:01.200]  The next thing I actually went and saw at the Department of Administrative Hearings, she recommended that I do it. We went through it and didactic whatever, you know, and she wrote it out there in person for me and then ignored it.
[54:01.200 --> 54:08.200]  Never did anything. The police was pretty much the same story, but that I went there on my own, you know, to do that.
[54:08.200 --> 54:13.200]  So I dropped it because I was new. I didn't know what to do. I didn't know who to follow up with.
[54:13.200 --> 54:20.200]  You guys quite a bit, you know, over the past couple of years. Now I have a new FOIA request I need to do.
[54:20.200 --> 54:30.200]  Hold on just a second. I'm going to ask you to stop saying FOIA because most states call it open records.
[54:30.200 --> 54:42.200]  And when people hear FOIA, they tend to think federal and there is a market difference between the feds and the states so that we keep these two separate.
[54:42.200 --> 54:49.200]  The feds don't have the same time constraints that the states do.
[54:49.200 --> 54:57.200]  So anyway, I just wanted to make the point to everybody listening that there is a big difference between the fed and the state.
[54:57.200 --> 55:12.200]  He's saying the same thing, but in the fed it's called the Freedom of Information Act and so they use the acronym FOIA, but in most of the states they call it either open government or freedom of information.
[55:12.200 --> 55:17.200]  I know I'm splitting hairs here, but I'm trying to avoid confusion down the road. Okay, go ahead.
[55:17.200 --> 55:37.200]  Look to notice because underlying all of this is the truth that we, the people, get to ask any governmental agency for any records we want because the government is the servant and we are the master.
[55:37.200 --> 55:55.200]  So if I want to see some records, I just ask for them. Now, they have different titles on this piece of paper that says why they need to tell me that and one of them, if it's a federal agency, their top of their paper says Freedom of Information Act.
[55:55.200 --> 56:11.200]  They have all these rules about how they have to answer within whatever 20 days and if I ask a state, a governmental body within the state or Chicago Police Department, they have a different heading across that piece of paper for them.
[56:11.200 --> 56:24.200]  It'll say something about open records or public information, but it's still the underlying thing is I am the people I get to ask. You're the servant. You have to answer.
[56:24.200 --> 56:31.200]  So there's just different statutes and codes behind that. Does that make sense?
[56:31.200 --> 56:39.200]  It does, yeah. I mean, I'm getting, I got a lot more nerve with it now, but that's really what it was, is follow through more than anything.
[56:39.200 --> 56:50.200]  But this time around, I'm helping a couple people with some unemployment issues in Colorado. The pandemic thing, they set off all these stimulus bills or whatever.
[56:50.200 --> 56:57.200]  Well, unemployment's been an interesting monster for a lot of people. It's been beneficial on some levels, but it's also been a new monster.
[56:57.200 --> 57:10.200]  And anyway, there was a lot of little nuances in the governor there in Colorado without a new mandate, personal mandate, or I should say governor's order, giving a little extra cash with a one-time payment.
[57:10.200 --> 57:22.200]  Well, a lot of people aren't getting it, and they're asking why, and they're just getting excuses from the employment office. So I propose why don't we do a Freedom of Information Act or a record request.
[57:22.200 --> 57:27.200]  What was the specifics to who was entitled behind, you know, from the governor's order?
[57:27.200 --> 57:43.200]  And start digging because the one person I did help, they were making some mistakes that I told them, like, get into this agency, say these words, and sure enough, we got to the head of pretty high up in unemployment within two or three days.
[57:43.200 --> 57:50.200]  The mistakes were done. He didn't have to wait another three months and things were on the roll just by putting pressure on the right people.
[57:50.200 --> 58:01.200]  But I want to make a little bit more of an example this time and get them, maybe imply that they're actually stealing that money is that there's a lot of people who didn't get it.
[58:01.200 --> 58:07.200]  So, but I need to start with the record request.
[58:07.200 --> 58:21.200]  Okay. With records request, just in general, if you're somewhere in America, a good starting place for this to try to find a leg up on it is to go to nfoic.org.
[58:21.200 --> 58:28.200]  It's a national, what is it, the National Freedom of Information Coalition, and it's got more.
[58:28.200 --> 58:38.200]  Then you can click on Find Your State and it will tell you which law is for the open records or whatever act is appropriate for that particular state.
[58:38.200 --> 58:44.200]  That kind of gives you a leg up to start searching. Some will call it sunshine laws.
[58:44.200 --> 58:50.200]  But take a look at that and we will talk about that some more.
[58:50.200 --> 58:58.200]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.200 --> 59:06.200]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.200 --> 59:09.200]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.200 --> 59:18.200]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.200 --> 59:28.200]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.200 --> 59:33.200]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.200 --> 59:48.200]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.200 --> 59:52.200]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:52.200 --> 01:00:00.200]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.200 --> 01:00:06.200]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.200 --> 01:00:20.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[01:00:20.200 --> 01:00:31.200]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $227.26,
[01:00:31.200 --> 01:00:46.200]  XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:46.200 --> 01:00:57.200]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade,
[01:00:57.200 --> 01:01:00.200]  killing 10 and injuring 40.
[01:01:00.200 --> 01:01:04.200]  Today in history.
[01:01:04.200 --> 01:01:17.200]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing hemp into Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges
[01:01:17.200 --> 01:01:24.200]  and even refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC.
[01:01:24.200 --> 01:01:33.200]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:33.200 --> 01:01:48.200]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works.
[01:01:48.200 --> 01:02:01.200]  As well as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso, Kaima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.200 --> 01:02:13.200]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.200 --> 01:02:22.200]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[01:02:22.200 --> 01:02:39.200]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.200 --> 01:02:51.200]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:51.200 --> 01:03:00.200]  This was Ruth Brody with the lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:21.200 --> 01:03:50.200]  Okay, we are back. This is the rule of law radio.
[01:03:50.200 --> 01:04:05.200]  Today is Thursday, 18th of March, 2021. And we are talking with Chris in Colorado. And Chris, when we went out to the sponsors, we were talking about how we can connect.
[01:04:05.200 --> 01:04:14.200]  We can take a look at the Colorado. You wanted to make more of an impression, you said this time.
[01:04:14.200 --> 01:04:33.200]  Well, I want to be more thorough with it. So what I've learned with a lot of these agencies, they pay a lot of frontline people, you know, 12 bucks an hour, 10 bucks an hour, 14 an hour to just basically act as filters and keep as many issues away from people at a higher up like management.
[01:04:33.200 --> 01:04:39.200]  But as soon as you get to management, they're afraid and they buckle and that's, you know, I've learned that a long time ago.
[01:04:39.200 --> 01:04:51.200]  But the unemployment division is a unique piece. I mean, they are like impenetrable really on many levels. I had to get really creative and literally start dialing number after number after number.
[01:04:51.200 --> 01:04:59.200]  Opening, I would hit the right extension. Finally, I got somebody. It's just, it's madness. Like they guard everybody there very, very well.
[01:04:59.200 --> 01:05:09.200]  Well, I'll tell you what, I have a tip that I can share with you that has helped me sometimes with agencies like this in Texas.
[01:05:09.200 --> 01:05:18.200]  I don't know in Colorado if it's the same, but it looks like it's going to be. I see a lot of similarities already just looking in the last few minutes.
[01:05:18.200 --> 01:05:31.200]  But in Texas, the people that are responsible to answer your requests are not the, these front lines that you're hitting. You're hitting all this filter people that you talk about.
[01:05:31.200 --> 01:05:41.200]  Don't talk to them. Instead, the ones who are responsible are the elected officials and the heads of departments.
[01:05:41.200 --> 01:05:54.200]  So one thing I like to do that just seems to skip a lot of that shrapnel is go straight to the HR director, the director of the HR department and ask for an org chart.
[01:05:54.200 --> 01:06:00.200]  Ask for a list of all the people with their job titles and how much do we, the people pay these guys. I want a list.
[01:06:00.200 --> 01:06:14.200]  And the HR director, well, they're just happy to do that. They don't know anything about your situation. Nobody ever talks to them. They're fine with that. They go ahead and give you the org chart and the list of all this stuff.
[01:06:14.200 --> 01:06:21.200]  And, you know, because you've asked for financial information, they're none the wiser. They just go ahead and give you that information.
[01:06:21.200 --> 01:06:26.200]  And of course they have to anyway. It doesn't matter if they would like to resist, but they usually don't.
[01:06:26.200 --> 01:06:35.200]  The HR people, that's a good place to start. Then you have a chart which you can say, oh, these are the people that I want to talk to.
[01:06:35.200 --> 01:06:42.200]  Then you go to the IT director and you say, I want the fax numbers and email addresses of these people and you name them.
[01:06:42.200 --> 01:06:54.200]  At that point, then you're able to start with your real questions because now you have a way to talk to them and skip all of that nonsense that kind of filter you out.
[01:06:54.200 --> 01:06:56.200]  Just a suggestion.
[01:06:56.200 --> 01:07:03.200]  That's a good one. I can't even find anybody other than the, I mean, I found a couple people just do, like I said, my little hunt.
[01:07:03.200 --> 01:07:07.200]  So I do have some names. I'll see if I can dig and see if I can find human resources.
[01:07:07.200 --> 01:07:15.200]  I basically, I got like a second or third down from the actual elected official or the appointed official who runs the entire unemployment.
[01:07:15.200 --> 01:07:21.200]  So I got to get a little creative and find human resources and IT. That's a good point. That's a good way to do it. I like that.
[01:07:21.200 --> 01:07:30.200]  Because once this starts rolling, I'm just going to assume they're not just going to ignore it, most people, you know, because this is one of the most incompetent agencies I think I've ever dealt with.
[01:07:30.200 --> 01:07:33.200]  These people, I don't know how to even get hired. They don't even know it.
[01:07:33.200 --> 01:07:40.200]  I spoke to a girl the other day who was actually pretty upfront. She's like, yeah, I just got hired. She didn't know how to answer questions, but she got to a supervisor.
[01:07:40.200 --> 01:07:46.200]  She was very helpful, but I mean, everybody else except her and one other, they're just completely incompetent.
[01:07:46.200 --> 01:07:52.200]  So I'm assuming they're going to just ignore it and then I'm going to have to start putting heat on it after.
[01:07:52.200 --> 01:08:02.200]  And that's the more of the procedural questions that I'm asking. How do you start putting heat on the right people to make them realize they're about to come under a bit of a microscope?
[01:08:02.200 --> 01:08:08.200]  Have they been mishandling the funds for the unemployment that was issued by the government, the federal government?
[01:08:08.200 --> 01:08:12.200]  Have they literally been stealing these small payments because they are so small?
[01:08:12.200 --> 01:08:18.200]  People are looking by the side from the governor's order. That's probably where I'm going to start digging and uncovering.
[01:08:18.200 --> 01:08:25.200]  And that's where I need to kind of be a little more thorough this time because this is for external people.
[01:08:25.200 --> 01:08:31.200]  What you don't want to do, you don't want to ask them questions that they have to answer yes or no. Did you misuse something?
[01:08:31.200 --> 01:08:34.200]  Instead, ask them for records.
[01:08:34.200 --> 01:08:37.200]  Right.
[01:08:37.200 --> 01:08:44.200]  Complete record of all payments made and persons to whom those payments were made.
[01:08:44.200 --> 01:08:50.200]  When you're asking for four financial records, they are almost always completely open.
[01:08:50.200 --> 01:09:00.200]  And one of the things I like to do is ask for information that will make them uncomfortable.
[01:09:00.200 --> 01:09:07.200]  Like you want to know how much each employee of this agency makes.
[01:09:07.200 --> 01:09:10.200]  You want to see their financial records.
[01:09:10.200 --> 01:09:17.200]  That's going to make them scratch their head and ask themselves, why are they looking there?
[01:09:17.200 --> 01:09:21.200]  Why are they looking at me personally?
[01:09:21.200 --> 01:09:23.200]  And everybody else here, what are they looking for?
[01:09:23.200 --> 01:09:32.200]  If they don't know what you're looking for, they will always assume something worse than what you're actually doing.
[01:09:32.200 --> 01:09:34.200]  Okay.
[01:09:34.200 --> 01:09:41.200]  Then when you get to the easier request, they're more likely to respond to them.
[01:09:41.200 --> 01:09:52.200]  There was an attorney who was being a real obstacle in one of the counties here.
[01:09:52.200 --> 01:09:55.200]  Brett, Brett, that was good.
[01:09:55.200 --> 01:10:02.200]  I was wondering if you were going to say it on the air and you come up with a great synonym.
[01:10:02.200 --> 01:10:05.200]  It would go ahead.
[01:10:05.200 --> 01:10:08.200]  You like that, huh?
[01:10:08.200 --> 01:10:09.200]  Caught it.
[01:10:09.200 --> 01:10:19.200]  Okay, so this attorney, he was trying to prevent me from having access to the records that I was looking for.
[01:10:19.200 --> 01:10:34.200]  And so just something came over me and I just had an overwhelming need to find out from the IT director about all of the cryptocurrency transactions that have been happening that are not reported,
[01:10:34.200 --> 01:10:39.200]  but they're happening across his network and going to this attorney.
[01:10:39.200 --> 01:10:43.200]  And I need to know about those cryptocurrency transactions.
[01:10:43.200 --> 01:10:51.200]  So he needs to inspect his server logs and his router logs to come up with those records for me.
[01:10:51.200 --> 01:10:58.200]  You know that attorney, I think he kind of lost his, he decided he didn't want to be such an obstacle anymore.
[01:10:58.200 --> 01:11:02.200]  I thought that was kind of cool.
[01:11:02.200 --> 01:11:07.200]  I hadn't thought of asking for cryptocurrency.
[01:11:07.200 --> 01:11:16.200]  Yeah, because obviously he's trying to hide his money trail under the table by sneaky doing this Bitcoin stuff without anybody knowing it.
[01:11:16.200 --> 01:11:18.200]  And yeah, obviously.
[01:11:18.200 --> 01:11:29.200]  Even if he's not, you're giving his superiors the impression that he is.
[01:11:29.200 --> 01:11:32.200]  Oh, that's devious.
[01:11:32.200 --> 01:11:41.200]  Well, I'll tell you, Chris, in Colorado here, I'm looking at what you want to look at is called the C O R A Colorado Open Records Act.
[01:11:41.200 --> 01:11:46.200]  And it says it's 2472 203.
[01:11:46.200 --> 01:11:50.200]  That's that's where I would suggest you start.
[01:11:50.200 --> 01:12:05.200]  And it does say here that they have a reasonable time to respond. And fortunately, they even tell us what is considered reasonable three business days.
[01:12:05.200 --> 01:12:07.200]  Oh my God.
[01:12:07.200 --> 01:12:16.200]  So if they don't respond to you in three business days, then they're outside the lines now.
[01:12:16.200 --> 01:12:20.200]  Let me address that quickly.
[01:12:20.200 --> 01:12:30.200]  What that means is if they respond within three days, the legal presumption is is that the response is timely.
[01:12:30.200 --> 01:12:43.200]  And if you feel that it's not timely, for instance, who you're speaking to had the record in front of them at the moment, then you must show that it's not timely.
[01:12:43.200 --> 01:12:53.200]  If they exceed the three days, then the presumption is that it was not timely and they have to prove why it wasn't.
[01:12:53.200 --> 01:12:55.200]  Does that make sense?
[01:12:55.200 --> 01:13:07.200]  Yeah, but I'm also seeing where they can actually submit a bill to me for requesting as well before fulfilling a substantial request agency to provide cost estimate to the requester.
[01:13:07.200 --> 01:13:18.200]  You might check into that a little bit more because it may only apply if they have, if they're producing copies for you and the copies are expensive.
[01:13:18.200 --> 01:13:19.200]  I think you're right.
[01:13:19.200 --> 01:13:22.200]  So I read two part down it's mentioning.
[01:13:22.200 --> 01:13:29.200]  As soon as the requester includes that sort of time for staff to search for, retrieve, redact, assemble and transmit the record as well.
[01:13:29.200 --> 01:13:30.200]  They got that in that too.
[01:13:30.200 --> 01:13:34.200]  They have that and they also do have copies as well.
[01:13:34.200 --> 01:13:42.200]  Generally, they have a number of documents that they have to produce without charging you.
[01:13:42.200 --> 01:13:44.200]  Brett, what is it in Texas?
[01:13:44.200 --> 01:13:48.200]  Is it three file boxes?
[01:13:48.200 --> 01:13:53.200]  Yeah, that's one thing that is a limit and another is 50 pages.
[01:13:53.200 --> 01:13:59.200]  It depends on, I think it was a county court in charge for 50 pages.
[01:13:59.200 --> 01:14:07.200]  But yeah, there's three archives, they call them archive boxes and it's these giant like banker box.
[01:14:07.200 --> 01:14:13.200]  And they even describe the dimensions and the size of the box.
[01:14:13.200 --> 01:14:21.200]  But one thing I think Chris that you'll be interested to notice here is what happens after the three days.
[01:14:21.200 --> 01:14:23.200]  You're talking about being more thorough.
[01:14:23.200 --> 01:14:37.200]  Colorado has the legislature repealed 2472 206 says for a violation penalty for if these guys don't do what they're supposed to do and give you the records.
[01:14:37.200 --> 01:14:39.200]  Well, they repealed that entire section.
[01:14:39.200 --> 01:14:51.200]  So now there's no violation penalty listed there, which Randy to me and tell me what you think to me that seems like it's just going to fall back to a general official misconduct.
[01:14:51.200 --> 01:14:53.200]  That's exactly their job.
[01:14:53.200 --> 01:14:55.200]  That's exactly what I was thinking.
[01:14:55.200 --> 01:14:58.200]  Official misconduct would cover it.
[01:14:58.200 --> 01:15:04.200]  So then for that you would want to take a look at the Colorado Colorado revised statutes.
[01:15:04.200 --> 01:15:13.200]  It's title 18 criminal code article eight offenses governmental operations part four abuse of public office.
[01:15:13.200 --> 01:15:20.200]  And it says in here section 188 404 first degree official misconduct.
[01:15:20.200 --> 01:15:36.200]  If a public says a public servant public servant commits first degree official misconduct if with intent to obtain a benefit for the public servant or another or maliciously cause harm to another.
[01:15:36.200 --> 01:15:55.200]  He or she knowingly commits an act relating to his office but constituting an unauthorized exercise of his official function or refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him by law or violates any statute or lawfully adopted rule or regulation relating to his office.
[01:15:55.200 --> 01:15:57.200]  So that pretty much covers it right there.
[01:15:57.200 --> 01:16:00.200]  And I think that's where you'll be able to hammer them.
[01:16:00.200 --> 01:16:09.200]  Okay, I need to get a little recreative there that's probably a good one because I looked a little more about this cost anything that goes over an hour.
[01:16:09.200 --> 01:16:21.200]  Then they are going to then they can say they can recharge but at the last bit it says cost associated with the request must be paid in full before the agency will produce the records.
[01:16:21.200 --> 01:16:26.200]  Okay, and you might also separate your requests out so that you you space them out.
[01:16:26.200 --> 01:16:31.200]  Texas has something that if you put them in within 24 hours of each other they get to lump them in together.
[01:16:31.200 --> 01:16:45.200]  So if I have things that might be more voluminous I will separate it out by 25 hours apart so they can't lump them together and say that it was too much.
[01:16:45.200 --> 01:16:58.200]  Well we're going to go ahead and go to our sponsors. The call in number is 512-646-1984 and call in and get on the board. We'll be right back.
[01:17:15.200 --> 01:17:20.200]  So shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your father which is in heaven.
[01:17:20.200 --> 01:17:25.200]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:25.200 --> 01:17:34.200]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[01:17:34.200 --> 01:17:40.200]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week.
[01:17:40.200 --> 01:17:47.200]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character development.
[01:17:47.200 --> 01:18:00.200]  So mark your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[01:18:00.200 --> 01:18:11.200]  It's the 2019 LogosRadio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:18:11.200 --> 01:18:18.200]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated. Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[01:18:18.200 --> 01:18:30.200]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR 15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:18:30.200 --> 01:18:35.200]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:18:35.200 --> 01:18:39.200]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:18:39.200 --> 01:18:48.200]  If you've enjoyed the shows on LogosRadioNetwork, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:18:48.200 --> 01:18:55.200]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:18:55.200 --> 01:19:11.200]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:19:25.200 --> 01:19:41.200]  Well, you ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again. I was blindsided but now I can see your face.
[01:19:41.200 --> 01:19:51.200]  You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hands. Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:51.200 --> 01:19:59.200]  You put the fear in my pockets, took the money from my hands.
[01:19:59.200 --> 01:20:07.200]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, Rue Lauderdale on this Thursday.
[01:20:07.200 --> 01:20:16.200]  What is it, Brett? The 18th day of March, 2000 and what year?
[01:20:16.200 --> 01:20:20.200]  I keep messing that up. I get it. He needs to help me.
[01:20:20.200 --> 01:20:26.200]  Okay, we're talking to Chris and Colorado. Chris, do you have anything else for us?
[01:20:26.200 --> 01:20:35.200]  If I could squeeze one quick one in, hopefully. I'm still trying to figure out how to collect the money from the guy who owes me deposit.
[01:20:35.200 --> 01:20:40.200]  I messaged him. He's ignoring it so he's gonna play total. You know what?
[01:20:40.200 --> 01:20:43.200]  Have you been to court with him?
[01:20:43.200 --> 01:20:46.200]  Yeah, I got a judgment against him.
[01:20:46.200 --> 01:20:54.200]  Okay, then take the judgment to the sheriff and ask the sheriff to enforce the judgment.
[01:20:54.200 --> 01:20:58.200]  Right, so I was looking at that. It's called a writ of execution, right?
[01:20:58.200 --> 01:21:00.200]  Yes.
[01:21:00.200 --> 01:21:04.200]  Okay, I don't need to go back to the court to do that. I just go to the sheriff.
[01:21:04.200 --> 01:21:10.200]  Yeah, I'm sorry. I think you need to go to the court and get the writ of execution. I wasn't thinking.
[01:21:10.200 --> 01:21:17.200]  Okay. I made a mistake first time and you got to be there to see it.
[01:21:17.200 --> 01:21:21.200]  Well, maybe not the first time.
[01:21:21.200 --> 01:21:24.200]  Let's ask your wife about that.
[01:21:24.200 --> 01:21:34.200]  No, no, no. Let's see. If you call her, the ringer on her phone for me is a jackass brain.
[01:21:34.200 --> 01:21:41.200]  I don't know why she would do that. Well, maybe I do.
[01:21:41.200 --> 01:21:45.200]  Okay. Anything else, Chris?
[01:21:45.200 --> 01:21:51.200]  No, that's good enough. I'll ask the other one to look another night. So thank you guys. Thank you very much.
[01:21:51.200 --> 01:22:01.200]  Thank you, Chris. Okay, now we're gonna go to David in Texas. Hello, David. What do you have for us today?
[01:22:01.200 --> 01:22:12.200]  Oh, yeah. I'm sorry. The lawyer just got with his bail fraud.
[01:22:12.200 --> 01:22:21.200]  I am sorry, David. We always seem to have trouble with your sound. Can you try and get a little closer to the mic?
[01:22:21.200 --> 01:22:24.200]  Oh, how's that?
[01:22:24.200 --> 01:22:32.200]  Maybe. Keep talking. Just go ahead. I'll do my best to figure it out.
[01:22:32.200 --> 01:22:39.200]  Yeah, it's about mail fraud. There's a couple of statutes on the mail fraud.
[01:22:39.200 --> 01:22:58.200]  I can start out with 1341 and calls all the way to 1351. I was wondering, I've been trying to charge these attorneys when they send me like a declaration statement, a motion with the wrong address.
[01:22:58.200 --> 01:23:04.200]  And, you know, like a threatening letter, like the JP sent me some threatening letter.
[01:23:04.200 --> 01:23:11.200]  Can I charge them with mail fraud or is that somewhat of a vague area?
[01:23:11.200 --> 01:23:27.200]  What? That's not so vague. It's not mail fraud, but if you use the mail toward the commission of a crime, I'm not sure exactly the statute, but that's a separate offense.
[01:23:27.200 --> 01:23:38.200]  Yeah, it's 18 USC 1341 and 1342 sometimes will fit also.
[01:23:38.200 --> 01:23:47.200]  1343 for some electronic stuff, but the 1341 is a pretty good fit and it doesn't seem vague to me.
[01:23:47.200 --> 01:24:00.200]  And they're trying to do some kind of a scam where they want you to pay something or trying to get you to participate in their business dealings where you didn't really want to participate, but now they're trying to corral you into it.
[01:24:00.200 --> 01:24:11.200]  And they sent this scheme at you in the U.S. Post Office. Well, that's a federal crime.
[01:24:11.200 --> 01:24:18.200]  And just a little side note, federal crimes, if you, somebody did something wrong, you have to go to the appropriate jurisdiction to report it.
[01:24:18.200 --> 01:24:29.200]  So a federal crime gets reported federally. You don't go down and give that to the local mayor or magistrate. You give that to who Randy? A federal district judge?
[01:24:29.200 --> 01:24:34.200]  Yeah, well, technically go to the FBI special agent in charge.
[01:24:34.200 --> 01:24:49.200]  Technically, Attorney General opinion H 500 addresses this. And that says that a magistrate in Texas can take any complaints, felony or misdemeanor state or federal.
[01:24:49.200 --> 01:24:58.200]  But trying to file a federal complaint with a state official, the state officials have no clue.
[01:24:58.200 --> 01:25:11.200]  So what I generally do with a federal complaint is I will find the special agent in charge of the FBI in the jurisdiction where the complaint originated.
[01:25:11.200 --> 01:25:19.200]  Because that is the only FBI agent whose name you can actually get. His name will be on the website.
[01:25:19.200 --> 01:25:32.200]  So you send it to him insured with a cover letter, asking him to initial it and return it in the stamp self addressed envelope.
[01:25:32.200 --> 01:25:43.200]  Odds are you'll never get that in return to you. And when you don't get that returned to you, that gives you reasonable probable cause to believe he never got it.
[01:25:43.200 --> 01:25:49.200]  Because being the special agent in charge, he is obviously a conscientious employee.
[01:25:49.200 --> 01:25:56.200]  Of course, he's going to be a smart guy and do everything right. I actually like to use a postcard.
[01:25:56.200 --> 01:26:02.200]  I guess it's the same thing, but the stamps are cheaper. Call me Gen Z.
[01:26:02.200 --> 01:26:03.200]  Good point.
[01:26:03.200 --> 01:26:04.200]  I use postcards.
[01:26:04.200 --> 01:26:16.200]  Okay, Gen Z. When you don't get the postcard back, then you get to go to the postal inspectors and say, guys, I insured this for a thousand bucks.
[01:26:16.200 --> 01:26:20.200]  I didn't get my postcard back. I want my thousand bucks.
[01:26:20.200 --> 01:26:25.200]  When you ask for a thousand bucks, they're going to say, well, what makes you think you didn't get it?
[01:26:25.200 --> 01:26:31.200]  Well, I put this postcard in there and asked him to initial it and return it. Well, I didn't get it back.
[01:26:31.200 --> 01:26:39.200]  And they're going to say, well, maybe he just didn't bother to send it. See, I know that's possible, but that's what you got to find out.
[01:26:39.200 --> 01:26:44.200]  Otherwise, pay me my thousand dollars.
[01:26:44.200 --> 01:26:50.200]  And they're going to do a little CYA cover your behind.
[01:26:50.200 --> 01:27:03.200]  And they're going to send out a couple of postal inspectors and ask this special agent in charge of the FBI some questions that he's not going to want to have to answer.
[01:27:03.200 --> 01:27:11.200]  Randy, didn't you say that these postal inspectors are pretty happy to do that because they don't get to throw their weight around very often?
[01:27:11.200 --> 01:27:27.200]  Oh, yeah. The feds treat the postal inspectors like Aaron Stepchildren. When you give the postal inspectors jurisdiction over the feds, they get to come in there and dance on the feds.
[01:27:27.200 --> 01:27:36.200]  And they will probably send you a Christmas card for giving them the opportunity to do it. Now, this just goes to interagency politics.
[01:27:36.200 --> 01:27:45.200]  They get to sting the feds. Yahoo! I had a friend years ago before all this social media and he was in mail order.
[01:27:45.200 --> 01:27:57.200]  And we were talking about the feds one time and he said, oh, feds are nothing. You have not lived until you had the postal inspectors after you.
[01:27:57.200 --> 01:28:09.200]  And in his business, he had been doing this a long time and he had been approached by both the feds and the postal inspectors and he said, I will take the feds any day.
[01:28:09.200 --> 01:28:16.200]  So that was good information. Postal inspectors, they don't sound very important.
[01:28:16.200 --> 01:28:25.200]  And I guess they feel like they have to do something to make themselves, to get themselves to be taken serious.
[01:28:25.200 --> 01:28:34.200]  But to stick them on the special agent in charge is going to be wonderful because when you run the routine on them, when the special agent in charge doesn't give you that back,
[01:28:34.200 --> 01:28:43.200]  then you send a criminal complaint against the special agent in charge to the grand jury by way of the U.S. Attorney's Office.
[01:28:43.200 --> 01:28:46.200]  Because that's the only address you have for the grand jury.
[01:28:46.200 --> 01:28:59.200]  The same cover letter. Well, not the same cover letter. This cover letter is a little more juicy in that it asks the foreman to initial this.
[01:28:59.200 --> 01:29:10.200]  Do not sign it. As the U.S. Attorney has a rubber stamp with your name on it that he uses to rubber stamp superseding indictments.
[01:29:10.200 --> 01:29:19.200]  There is no way the U.S. Attorney is going to let that get to the foreman. So you're not going to get that back.
[01:29:19.200 --> 01:29:27.200]  And now you prepare another complaint and you also have that one in charge. So you send the postal inspectors down.
[01:29:27.200 --> 01:29:34.200]  You file another complaint against the U.S. Attorney and send it to the foreman.
[01:29:34.200 --> 01:29:40.200]  The U.S. Attorney is going to intercept that one when he opens it and sees you filed against him.
[01:29:40.200 --> 01:29:46.200]  He's going to say, that rascal set me up. As a matter of fact, he did.
[01:29:46.200 --> 01:29:53.200]  The U.S. Attorney General is the next stop. Hang on. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, the rule of all radio.
[01:29:53.200 --> 01:30:00.200]  Another good call-in number. We've got a full board and only two segments. We'll be right back.
[01:30:00.200 --> 01:30:10.200]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing.
[01:30:10.200 --> 01:30:13.200]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:30:13.200 --> 01:30:16.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Back with details in a moment.
[01:30:16.200 --> 01:30:22.200]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.200 --> 01:30:27.200]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.200 --> 01:30:32.200]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.200 --> 01:30:38.200]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com.
[01:30:38.200 --> 01:30:45.200]  The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.200 --> 01:30:49.200]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:49.200 --> 01:30:52.200]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart.
[01:30:52.200 --> 01:30:57.200]  But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:30:57.200 --> 01:31:01.200]  A new study finds stress reduces the number of connections between neurons,
[01:31:01.200 --> 01:31:04.200]  which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:31:04.200 --> 01:31:11.200]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed out people have less grain matter in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:31:11.200 --> 01:31:16.200]  That's the part of the brain that helps us weigh conflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:31:16.200 --> 01:31:21.200]  So take a deep breath and chill out. It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:31:21.200 --> 01:31:27.200]  Like Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.200 --> 01:31:37.200]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:37.200 --> 01:31:39.200]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.200 --> 01:31:44.200]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.200 --> 01:31:47.200]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:47.200 --> 01:31:51.200]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.200 --> 01:31:53.200]  I'm a New York City correctional officer.
[01:31:53.200 --> 01:31:54.200]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.200 --> 01:31:56.200]  And the father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.200 --> 01:31:58.200]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.200 --> 01:32:01.200]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.200 --> 01:32:06.200]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[01:32:06.200 --> 01:32:08.200]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[01:32:08.200 --> 01:32:10.200]  and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:32:10.200 --> 01:32:13.200]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.200 --> 01:32:16.200]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place.
[01:32:16.200 --> 01:32:18.200]  The right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:18.200 --> 01:32:20.200]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.200 --> 01:32:23.200]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[01:32:23.200 --> 01:32:26.200]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.200 --> 01:32:29.200]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.200 --> 01:32:32.200]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:32.200 --> 01:32:34.200]  that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:34.200 --> 01:32:36.200]  and how to hold your courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.200 --> 01:32:38.200]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[01:32:38.200 --> 01:32:41.200]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.200 --> 01:32:43.200]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:43.200 --> 01:32:46.200]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie,
[01:32:46.200 --> 01:32:48.200]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:48.200 --> 01:32:51.200]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.200 --> 01:32:53.200]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[01:32:53.200 --> 01:32:55.200]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.200 --> 01:32:58.200]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society
[01:32:58.200 --> 01:33:00.200]  we all want and deserve.
[01:33:02.200 --> 01:33:05.200]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:33:05.200 --> 01:33:13.200]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:35.200 --> 01:33:45.200]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:45.200 --> 01:33:48.200]  We are back to Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:48.200 --> 01:33:54.200]  I'm Brett Fountain, and we are here talking with David in Texas.
[01:33:54.200 --> 01:33:58.200]  David, we were talking about the postal inspector.
[01:33:58.200 --> 01:34:01.200]  Over the break, we were having a little laugh
[01:34:01.200 --> 01:34:05.200]  thinking about how the postal inspector, if you have a chance
[01:34:05.200 --> 01:34:07.200]  to have any kind of conversation with him throughout this,
[01:34:07.200 --> 01:34:12.200]  you might even just let it casually drop that the whole reason for this
[01:34:12.200 --> 01:34:16.200]  is that that special agent in charge over there,
[01:34:16.200 --> 01:34:20.200]  why he seems to be trying to shield some people from prosecution
[01:34:20.200 --> 01:34:22.200]  while relating to mail fraud.
[01:34:25.200 --> 01:34:28.200]  That's what started this whole thing.
[01:34:28.200 --> 01:34:35.200]  The problem with me here is that they always put down
[01:34:35.200 --> 01:34:37.200]  like the wrong address.
[01:34:37.200 --> 01:34:40.200]  They take the motions and they tear them apart.
[01:34:40.200 --> 01:34:42.200]  They put a lot of life in there.
[01:34:42.200 --> 01:34:49.200]  And then like the JP, a couple of times I was down there
[01:34:49.200 --> 01:34:55.200]  and I filed with the county court.
[01:34:55.200 --> 01:35:00.200]  And they claimed, if I don't pay him any of the fines,
[01:35:00.200 --> 01:35:03.200]  that he should have an actual warrant.
[01:35:03.200 --> 01:35:05.200]  Now, I don't think the JP should have an actual warrant.
[01:35:05.200 --> 01:35:14.200]  So I was going to zoom in on this 1341 frauds and swindles.
[01:35:14.200 --> 01:35:17.200]  I figured that should cover it, doesn't it?
[01:35:19.200 --> 01:35:23.200]  I don't think that's necessarily a scheme.
[01:35:23.200 --> 01:35:26.200]  It would have to be some kind of a money scheme for that.
[01:35:26.200 --> 01:35:28.200]  And obviously, I mean in a big picture it is,
[01:35:28.200 --> 01:35:30.200]  you haven't agreed to do business with them.
[01:35:30.200 --> 01:35:33.200]  They're trying to drag you into the courts that you don't belong in
[01:35:33.200 --> 01:35:34.200]  and all that sort of thing.
[01:35:34.200 --> 01:35:39.200]  But if you're specifically referring to whether he has as a JP,
[01:35:39.200 --> 01:35:41.200]  does he have the authority to issue a warrant,
[01:35:41.200 --> 01:35:45.200]  what would make you think he shouldn't be able to?
[01:35:45.200 --> 01:35:51.200]  Well, wait a minute.
[01:35:51.200 --> 01:35:58.200]  David, did you say that if you didn't pay some kind of fee?
[01:35:58.200 --> 01:36:01.200]  Yeah, I've got the letter here.
[01:36:01.200 --> 01:36:06.200]  It said, didn't Penfield want a amount?
[01:36:06.200 --> 01:36:08.200]  Okay, what kind of fee?
[01:36:08.200 --> 01:36:15.200]  Was it a fee as a penalty against you for losing a case?
[01:36:15.200 --> 01:36:18.200]  Or was it another kind of fee?
[01:36:18.200 --> 01:36:20.200]  It was for a fine.
[01:36:20.200 --> 01:36:21.200]  I didn't pay the fine.
[01:36:21.200 --> 01:36:22.200]  Oh.
[01:36:22.200 --> 01:36:24.200]  Oh.
[01:36:24.200 --> 01:36:25.200]  Oh.
[01:36:25.200 --> 01:36:27.200]  So KP is profiled?
[01:36:27.200 --> 01:36:41.200]  David, read 45, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 45.016.
[01:36:41.200 --> 01:36:46.200]  I don't think he can issue a warrant.
[01:36:46.200 --> 01:36:49.200]  Well, he can't issue a warrant for failure to appear,
[01:36:49.200 --> 01:36:52.200]  but he could issue it if it's a KP as profiled.
[01:36:52.200 --> 01:36:58.200]  That would be you lost your case, you're considered guilty,
[01:36:58.200 --> 01:37:00.200]  and now it's time to pay.
[01:37:00.200 --> 01:37:08.200]  And you didn't pay, so they can issue a warrant that's called a KP as profiled warrant.
[01:37:08.200 --> 01:37:13.200]  Yeah, and it's reasonable they should be able to do that,
[01:37:13.200 --> 01:37:18.200]  because if they're issuing fines and they have no way to collect the fines,
[01:37:18.200 --> 01:37:23.200]  that would make that a, leave them with no authority.
[01:37:23.200 --> 01:37:28.200]  So, certainly if you don't pay a fine, he can issue a warrant.
[01:37:28.200 --> 01:37:33.200]  But read 45.016.
[01:37:33.200 --> 01:37:37.200]  And I know it says that they can't issue a cash bond.
[01:37:37.200 --> 01:37:43.200]  A justice at the peace cannot or municipal court cannot require a cash bond.
[01:37:43.200 --> 01:37:51.200]  They have to grant you a PR bond, personal reconnaissance bond.
[01:37:51.200 --> 01:37:54.200]  And that's in statute.
[01:37:54.200 --> 01:37:59.200]  But I didn't remember the entire, the whole statute.
[01:37:59.200 --> 01:38:06.200]  Yeah, 45.016 would be good to look at, and 45.013, let's see.
[01:38:06.200 --> 01:38:09.200]  Oh, no, I'm sorry, that's not it.
[01:38:09.200 --> 01:38:15.200]  Oh, I think it's 45.045, let me see.
[01:38:15.200 --> 01:38:22.200]  Yes, 45.045 is this other kind of warrant.
[01:38:22.200 --> 01:38:25.200]  So take a look at those, see if they seem to fit your situation.
[01:38:25.200 --> 01:38:33.200]  If you think that they're doing something outside the law, yeah, call it middle fraud, get the ball rolling.
[01:38:33.200 --> 01:38:37.200]  Okay.
[01:38:37.200 --> 01:38:40.200]  Do you have anything else for us, David?
[01:38:40.200 --> 01:38:43.200]  Yeah, I'm trying to write a motion here.
[01:38:43.200 --> 01:38:50.200]  And they keep telling me that federal rules of civil procedure rule A.
[01:38:50.200 --> 01:38:53.200]  General rules of cleaning.
[01:38:53.200 --> 01:38:57.200]  And they said that plaintiffs complain,
[01:38:57.200 --> 01:39:02.200]  players of the state claim on which to leave can be granted.
[01:39:02.200 --> 01:39:09.200]  Do I have to insert 1983, the portion of the food court plan,
[01:39:09.200 --> 01:39:20.200]  who have to state that in the motion to bring up the state that this is what I'm filing under?
[01:39:20.200 --> 01:39:22.200]  I always have a trouble hearing him.
[01:39:22.200 --> 01:39:25.200]  Brett, could you understand what you said?
[01:39:25.200 --> 01:39:33.200]  I think he's trying to say that they're kicking out his claim saying he failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted.
[01:39:33.200 --> 01:39:37.200]  And he was, I think David is asking, I can't hear him very well.
[01:39:37.200 --> 01:39:44.200]  It sounds like, David, it sounds like you're on the opposite side of a basketball field or something, a basketball court.
[01:39:44.200 --> 01:39:47.200]  And we're hearing the echo of a gymnasium or something.
[01:39:47.200 --> 01:39:49.200]  It's just like really distant.
[01:39:49.200 --> 01:40:02.200]  But Randy, I think he's talking about whether or not he should include the full text of US Code 1983 as his claim for relief.
[01:40:02.200 --> 01:40:07.200]  I believe that was his question.
[01:40:07.200 --> 01:40:08.200]  Wait a minute.
[01:40:08.200 --> 01:40:11.200]  US Code 1983.
[01:40:11.200 --> 01:40:13.200]  I think you've got to mix that up.
[01:40:13.200 --> 01:40:17.200]  42 US Code 1983.
[01:40:17.200 --> 01:40:20.200]  Yeah.
[01:40:20.200 --> 01:40:21.200]  Oh, okay.
[01:40:21.200 --> 01:40:27.200]  Now you're in the, this is the federal court and you're in there on, you're the plaintiff.
[01:40:27.200 --> 01:40:28.200]  Yeah.
[01:40:28.200 --> 01:40:29.200]  Okay.
[01:40:29.200 --> 01:40:39.200]  Then what would be the reason for the full text?
[01:40:39.200 --> 01:40:43.200]  Are they missing something?
[01:40:43.200 --> 01:40:51.200]  Well, I thought I had to insert that along with where it says, general rules of pleading, claim for relief.
[01:40:51.200 --> 01:40:58.200]  A short claim statement of grounds for the court's jurisdiction unless the court already has jurisdiction.
[01:40:58.200 --> 01:41:02.200]  Claim means new jurisdiction support.
[01:41:02.200 --> 01:41:10.200]  So I'm trying to figure out what do they want for support in the motion.
[01:41:10.200 --> 01:41:14.200]  Brett, to you understanding, I'm having a problem.
[01:41:14.200 --> 01:41:15.200]  Not really.
[01:41:15.200 --> 01:41:19.200]  I think he's asking about what to put in the motion.
[01:41:19.200 --> 01:41:24.200]  How does he write a motion?
[01:41:24.200 --> 01:41:30.200]  Wait, motion for what specifically?
[01:41:30.200 --> 01:41:34.200]  It's not really clear to me.
[01:41:34.200 --> 01:41:40.200]  No way, general rules of pleading.
[01:41:40.200 --> 01:41:44.200]  I think he said general rules of pleading.
[01:41:44.200 --> 01:41:46.200]  Is that right, David?
[01:41:46.200 --> 01:41:48.200]  Yeah.
[01:41:48.200 --> 01:41:49.200]  Okay.
[01:41:49.200 --> 01:41:56.200]  So I think he's just looking, just in general, how does he write his paperwork and not necessarily a motion.
[01:41:56.200 --> 01:42:03.200]  He's saying motion, but I think he's wanting to know how do I, how does he write the initial paperwork, the suit, the petition,
[01:42:03.200 --> 01:42:15.200]  however you want a civil complaint in a way that is not going to get kicked out by them saying you didn't claim anything that we can give you remedy for.
[01:42:15.200 --> 01:42:18.200]  There's almost no way to do that.
[01:42:18.200 --> 01:42:32.200]  Since the Iqbal decision, the courts for proceeds routinely dismiss their claims for failure to stay to claim no matter what.
[01:42:32.200 --> 01:42:43.200]  I had Judge McBride in Fort Worth dismiss my case with prejudice for failure to stay to claim under Rule 12, 12B6.
[01:42:43.200 --> 01:42:49.200]  But my case was a declaratory judgment case and it didn't have any claims in it.
[01:42:49.200 --> 01:42:55.200]  It's the nature of a declaratory judgment case, but it was just knee jerk.
[01:42:55.200 --> 01:43:03.200]  If it is a suit by a prose litigant of the federal courts, toss it.
[01:43:03.200 --> 01:43:09.200]  You'll get it reinstated in the Court of Appeals.
[01:43:09.200 --> 01:43:17.200]  But they throw everything out because they know most prose litigants won't be able to do the appeal.
[01:43:17.200 --> 01:43:29.200]  And it's take too much time on this show, but I can do a whole show on how to prepare your suit and the documents associated with your suit.
[01:43:29.200 --> 01:43:35.200]  There's a methodology for that that dramatically simplifies how you do it.
[01:43:35.200 --> 01:43:42.200]  You build one piece and then the next step, you add to that piece and the next step, you add to it.
[01:43:42.200 --> 01:43:47.200]  You're not building a whole thing all at one time, but I won't have time to explain that on this show.
[01:43:47.200 --> 01:43:53.200]  Hang on, go into our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fouton, Root of Our Radio.
[01:43:53.200 --> 01:44:00.200]  I'm not going to give up to call in numbers, we've got a full four to call us and only one segment left, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.200 --> 01:44:05.200]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[01:44:05.200 --> 01:44:09.200]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meares Proven Method.
[01:44:09.200 --> 01:44:14.200]  Michael Meares has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:44:14.200 --> 01:44:20.200]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:44:20.200 --> 01:44:24.200]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons.
[01:44:24.200 --> 01:44:26.200]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:44:26.200 --> 01:44:29.200]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[01:44:29.200 --> 01:44:33.200]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.200 --> 01:44:38.200]  The Michael Meares Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.200 --> 01:44:41.200]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:41.200 --> 01:44:49.200]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meares banner or email MichaelMeares at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.200 --> 01:45:00.200]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:00.200 --> 01:45:04.200]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.200 --> 01:45:15.200]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:15.200 --> 01:45:19.200]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.200 --> 01:45:23.200]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.200 --> 01:45:28.200]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.200 --> 01:45:34.200]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.200 --> 01:45:43.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.200 --> 01:45:52.200]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.200 --> 01:46:01.200]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:22.200 --> 01:46:40.200]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain-Rueb already, and David, we are really having a tough time hearing you.
[01:46:40.200 --> 01:46:44.200]  You really need to find some other device.
[01:46:44.200 --> 01:46:50.200]  If you're using a computer, you might want to get a headset. You can get one for 10 or 15 bucks.
[01:46:50.200 --> 01:46:57.200]  It sounds like you're using the mic on the computer because this is what it sounds like when you're far away from the mic.
[01:46:57.200 --> 01:46:59.200]  It sounds like you're in a well.
[01:46:59.200 --> 01:47:03.200]  So we've only got one segment left and three call-ins. I'm going to move on.
[01:47:03.200 --> 01:47:07.200]  See if you can find a better mic so we can understand you better, David.
[01:47:07.200 --> 01:47:13.200]  Thank you for calling. Now we're going to Tina in California. Hello, Tina.
[01:47:13.200 --> 01:47:16.200]  What do you have for us today?
[01:47:16.200 --> 01:47:21.200]  Hey, Randy and Brett. How are you?
[01:47:21.200 --> 01:47:28.200]  I just got a couple of little things because I'll say the most tomorrow because I have not had a good day.
[01:47:28.200 --> 01:47:32.200]  I've been feeling pretty awful today with a temperature.
[01:47:32.200 --> 01:47:41.200]  But I wanted to let people know what happened the other week when you gave me a little advice.
[01:47:41.200 --> 01:47:49.200]  We didn't have chance to talk about it and I thought it was very apt and profound.
[01:47:49.200 --> 01:47:56.200]  I had filed a case against the attorney for promissory fraud.
[01:47:56.200 --> 01:48:03.200]  This is in relation to the declaratory judgment which was denied and is still in appeal.
[01:48:03.200 --> 01:48:12.200]  But because this attorney had made a promise in writing to send me something and I had relied on that promise
[01:48:12.200 --> 01:48:23.200]  and he is collaboratively stocked from changing his words under Evidence Code 623,
[01:48:23.200 --> 01:48:31.200]  I had been advised by a former retired attorney judge that I did have a case.
[01:48:31.200 --> 01:48:41.200]  So I filed in our local court and because of COVID we can't go in because of all this mess.
[01:48:41.200 --> 01:48:50.200]  You can't talk to anyone but a kind security guard gave me a number that I could call in
[01:48:50.200 --> 01:48:53.200]  because I wasn't getting any luck on the regular number.
[01:48:53.200 --> 01:49:07.200]  And they gave me some advice in terms of I missed one of the documents, I missed the order for, you know, the poor,
[01:49:07.200 --> 01:49:10.200]  where I can file in form of porpoise.
[01:49:10.200 --> 01:49:12.200]  I needed the order.
[01:49:12.200 --> 01:49:21.200]  And so I put it all in on this one day and a week later nothing and I kept calling in,
[01:49:21.200 --> 01:49:26.200]  we're behind, we're behind, you know, just hang on, we'll get to it, we'll get to it.
[01:49:26.200 --> 01:49:32.200]  And then the third week we're still behind and then, oh, we don't have your filing.
[01:49:32.200 --> 01:49:35.200]  I said, how can you not have a filing?
[01:49:35.200 --> 01:49:39.200]  Because it was in the secure lockbox that the court had.
[01:49:39.200 --> 01:49:49.200]  And, you know, the woman was pretty, you know, mean and rude and I called her and she said, you know, what do I do?
[01:49:49.200 --> 01:49:56.200]  So he said, well, it sounds like, because she said, then she called me back and said it was the wrong venue.
[01:49:56.200 --> 01:50:05.200]  And Randy said official, there was official misconduct or something, you told me to write on it.
[01:50:05.200 --> 01:50:16.200]  And so I literally that day I put everything down on paper about what happened from the day I first took it when the court was closed,
[01:50:16.200 --> 01:50:22.200]  the approximate time I was there, you know, the person who gave me the advice of calling in this day.
[01:50:22.200 --> 01:50:24.200]  Oh, no, you've got to call in tomorrow.
[01:50:24.200 --> 01:50:26.200]  Oh, no, you've got to call in Monday.
[01:50:26.200 --> 01:50:30.200]  And I gave names and I'd asked for the supervisor.
[01:50:30.200 --> 01:50:37.200]  So I filed this official misconduct complaint to directly to the supervisor.
[01:50:37.200 --> 01:50:48.200]  And I only addressed, you know, the envelope I put personal confidential and I put delivered at the time I delivered it on this day.
[01:50:48.200 --> 01:50:53.200]  I got a call the very next morning.
[01:50:53.200 --> 01:50:55.200]  You know, I'm so sorry.
[01:50:55.200 --> 01:50:58.200]  The woman was so super sweet.
[01:50:58.200 --> 01:51:02.200]  You know, I just wanted to make sure I called you right away.
[01:51:02.200 --> 01:51:03.200]  The first thing.
[01:51:03.200 --> 01:51:04.200]  Wow.
[01:51:04.200 --> 01:51:07.200]  And yeah.
[01:51:07.200 --> 01:51:16.200]  And I just, you know, I want to let you know that, you know, the person who got this was new and they hadn't realized and they put it aside.
[01:51:16.200 --> 01:51:23.200]  And we really, really are behind and, you know, child abuse cases are taking precedence.
[01:51:23.200 --> 01:51:40.200]  But we wanted to let you know that, you know, we do check these things for whether it's correct venue because those who do not have the fee waiver have to pay $495.
[01:51:40.200 --> 01:51:42.200]  And this is the kicker.
[01:51:42.200 --> 01:51:53.200]  If it's filed in the wrong venue, they lose that money and they have to pay a game to file in the correct venue.
[01:51:53.200 --> 01:52:03.200]  And they, you know, because Randy had said, well, you know, ask about the clerk giving legal advice because of course they say they never can.
[01:52:03.200 --> 01:52:16.200]  So at the very bottom of the letter, I said, please can you give me your findings and facts of conclusions of law of why a clerk is able to give me legal advice to the correct venue.
[01:52:16.200 --> 01:52:26.200]  And I said sincerely and thank you and with respect and all that other, you know, stuff that you put in to make them feel you're not attacking them.
[01:52:26.200 --> 01:52:46.200]  And she said, well, you know, we, you are correct because I said in there that if the venue is not correct for the other side, they have the opportunity to file a motion to remove it to a different venue.
[01:52:46.200 --> 01:52:58.200]  And she said, you are correct in that. And you do live here, so we feel you are correct in filing it here and that they do have that opportunity to do that.
[01:52:58.200 --> 01:53:12.200]  But I just wanted to let you know why we do check these things because you have to pay again, which I think is extraordinarily ridiculous and wrong.
[01:53:12.200 --> 01:53:18.200]  And just for the record, that is not true.
[01:53:18.200 --> 01:53:26.200]  Yeah, well, I figured it might not be. And if it's the wrong venue, they should just transfer the money to the right venue, correct?
[01:53:26.200 --> 01:53:27.200]  Correct.
[01:53:27.200 --> 01:53:46.200]  Why? So, because I filed for informal cooperation because I'm on Medicare, I do qualify. So anyway, she said, I just wanted to let you know we have filed it and it's been sent out to you, the sign copies and you will be getting this soon and I did get it three days later.
[01:53:46.200 --> 01:54:02.200]  And I'm trying to serve the party, the attorney, and for the last four days, they have been missing in action even at 9.30 PM, they're not at home according to the party who answered the door and at 7.30 in the morning, they're not home.
[01:54:02.200 --> 01:54:21.200]  And we cannot serve them at their place of work because to close them due to COVID and they do not have an agent for service process on the California business secretary of state because they're not even registered there from what I can find out.
[01:54:21.200 --> 01:54:33.200]  So, we're playing that game with the service, but I just wanted to let people know that it was really insightful for anybody to give me that advice because I would not have known to go do it.
[01:54:33.200 --> 01:54:58.200]  I literally, you know, wrote it up that day and drove it down there and did it because three weeks is a long time to not file something when timing is of the essence if you've got something else against them and they might say, oh, well, this case was dismissed and now you've immediately filed another case which is meritless.
[01:54:58.200 --> 01:55:13.200]  So, that was very, very, very helpful and I'm waiting, of course, to, you know, get the service and I have other things to talk about, but I'll wait until tomorrow so that you can get to someone else.
[01:55:13.200 --> 01:55:40.200]  I did want to let everyone know that it's very helpful to write a very polite but very strict letter saying, hey, you're trying to give me legal advice, you're denying me access to court and failing to file something timely when if you're allowed to file it, you know, online, like an attorney, it gets filed immediately.
[01:55:40.200 --> 01:55:50.200]  Exactly. And sometimes you just have to step on them. The courts have ruled rights belong to the belligerent litigant.
[01:55:50.200 --> 01:55:55.200]  If you want them, you must claim them.
[01:55:55.200 --> 01:55:58.200]  Okay, we've got three minutes.
[01:55:58.200 --> 01:56:00.200]  Thank you very much, Tina.
[01:56:00.200 --> 01:56:01.200]  Thank you.
[01:56:01.200 --> 01:56:12.200]  If you have more questions, call back tomorrow night. We're going to go to Ted in California. Ted, tell us what happened at your last hearing.
[01:56:12.200 --> 01:56:39.200]  Okay, last Monday I went on, it was the 8th and this time actually did call my case. I went in there and got up there at the podium and, of course, the public defender that they've stuck on me got up to the podium and I just started out telling the judge, hey, this guy doesn't represent me and he doesn't speak for me.
[01:56:39.200 --> 01:57:00.200]  We ended up, I'm going to cut to the chase, the judge set a hearing for the following day and even the public defender didn't know what that was. It turned out to be a virtual hearing and it's a settlement calendar in another area and they do it all on the computer, you know, like Zoom or whatever.
[01:57:00.200 --> 01:57:23.200]  So the judge refused to tell me about it though. So we go out in the hallway and I basically jumped the public defender when he came out and I told him, you know, stop trespassing, you don't speak for me, don't you dare participate in that hearing tomorrow on my behalf, you don't speak for me.
[01:57:23.200 --> 01:57:44.200]  I'm suing you, what don't you get? You know, we're in litigation and he kind of started shaking and he's telling me not to point my finger at him and I told him I'll point my finger at him if I want, if he wants to continue to trespass on my case, you know, deal with it.
[01:57:44.200 --> 01:58:02.200]  Okay, Ted, you got to call us back tomorrow night. We're out of time today. I'm sorry I couldn't get to you quicker. We had a whole board full of calls. John, I'm sorry you didn't get in. Will you call us tomorrow night?
[01:58:02.200 --> 01:58:16.200]  Well, we'll do four hours tomorrow so we'll have time to get to everyone. Ted, yours is interesting for those out there. Ted's been in litigation on a non-charge for six years in California.
[01:58:16.200 --> 01:58:33.200]  He is a clear demonstration of how corrupt the California courts are, but he has hung in there with us. So, hang on and call us back tomorrow night, Ted. We'll have more time. This is Randy Kelton, Brett Souton, rule of the radio.
[01:58:33.200 --> 01:58:50.200]  We will be back tomorrow night on our four-hour info marathon. So, if you have questions or comments, listen tomorrow. Give us a call. Thank you for listening and good night.
[01:58:50.200 --> 01:59:06.200]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:06.200 --> 01:59:27.200]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:27.200 --> 01:59:50.200]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102, or by ordering online at freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:50.200 --> 02:00:00.200]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.