[00:00.000 --> 00:06.980]  And this is what happens when you call the cops.
[00:06.980 --> 00:07.920]  This is what happens when you call the cops.
[00:07.920 --> 00:08.420]  C'mon.
[00:09.060 --> 00:12.180]  These are what happens when you call the cops.
[00:12.180 --> 00:15.260]  You get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[00:15.260 --> 00:15.800]  Ah.
[00:15.800 --> 00:18.580]  This is what happens when you call the cops.
[00:19.780 --> 00:21.660]  This is what happens when you call the cops.
[00:21.660 --> 00:24.500]  You get your rights violated or you all get shot.
[00:24.500 --> 00:24.500]  Hey.
[00:24.500 --> 00:37.500]  Cargo is defined as the load, i.e. freight, of a vessel, train, truck, airplane, or other carrier.
[00:37.500 --> 00:53.500]  Okay? If you look them up, you will see similar meanings relative to carry and convey with similar meaning that they contain at least one instance where their definition is contextually related to an occupation, profession, or business activity.
[00:53.500 --> 00:57.500]  Which involves fees.
[00:57.500 --> 01:13.500]  When so defined, these terms have nothing to do with an individual's private actions and activities for their own personal business and pleasure, as long as they are not exercising their rights in a manner that infringes upon the person, rights, or property of another.
[01:13.500 --> 01:25.500]  My secondary reply to his last question there, as to your ending question, why are we excited that criminals are being protected? The answer is very simple.
[01:25.500 --> 01:39.500]  Because if their rights are not being recognized and protected regardless of the circumstances, then neither will yours be, even if you are completely innocent, or does that fact escape you somehow?
[01:39.500 --> 01:52.500]  The only way to protect your rights is to ensure that everyone's rights are equally protected. How do people in this day and age not know and understand this?
[01:52.500 --> 01:58.500]  Now I haven't gotten a reply back from this guy yet, but that's the one I gave him on his comment.
[01:58.500 --> 02:08.500]  The fact of the matter is, I am astounded on a daily basis by the number of people that don't know their rights from the rear end.
[02:08.500 --> 02:22.500]  They just don't. They think any excuse that can be used to say you can't do that is enough to qualify as something that can curb or diminish or destroy somebody's right to do something.
[02:22.500 --> 02:28.500]  And that just isn't so, people. It has never been so.
[02:28.500 --> 02:38.500]  The state cannot enact a law that does it. The courts cannot enforce a judgment that does it. They cannot uphold a law that does it.
[02:38.500 --> 02:43.500]  They cannot create a doctrine that does it.
[02:43.500 --> 02:54.500]  And in that regard, as Thomas Jefferson said, the only true purpose of government is to protect the rights of the people or individual rights.
[02:54.500 --> 03:11.500]  Okay. In that regard, every level of government, including the courts, the legislature, the police, the governor, everyone has completely violated the entire purpose for their existence.
[03:11.500 --> 03:28.500]  The moment they decided that government power trumps individual rights, where those rights were never used to harm another individual or their rights, when that decision was made, it was wrong from the get-go.
[03:28.500 --> 03:36.500]  It was wrong before pen hit paper. And these people know that. They don't care, but they know it.
[03:36.500 --> 03:47.500]  But because we're on a socialist railroad track getting pushed further and further toward that end of the line barricade that we're going to crash into,
[03:47.500 --> 04:05.500]  that takes us across the line of freedom and free people into enslaved, completely domesticated and entrapped socialist-controlled and communist-controlled people, is that barricade.
[04:05.500 --> 04:12.500]  And the only thing that stands representative of that barricade is our constitution.
[04:12.500 --> 04:22.500]  And the closer they can push us toward that and past it, the closer they are to reaching their agenda of destroying it.
[04:22.500 --> 04:48.500]  And they're going to use us as the train that crashes through it, because they are mind-controlling so many people right now on how they think and why they think it, that they will run through that barricade and never look in any other direction for half a second to understand why what they're about to do is so wrong, why what they've been doing is so wrong.
[04:53.500 --> 05:03.500]  The moment the federal government started creating agencies that were not within the enumerated powers given them by the constitution, the people should have put their foot down and put a stop to it.
[05:03.500 --> 05:10.500]  But we did not. And we did not force our state legislatures to do it either.
[05:10.500 --> 05:16.500]  We are going to devise and drive our own destruction.
[05:16.500 --> 05:25.500]  Alright folks, calling number 512-646-1984. If y'all want to call and get in line, we will be right back after this break, so y'all hang on.
[05:46.500 --> 05:57.500]  The Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[05:57.500 --> 06:06.500]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[06:06.500 --> 06:16.500]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraisers so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[06:16.500 --> 06:27.500]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[06:27.500 --> 06:32.500]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even losses?
[06:32.500 --> 06:42.500]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meares Proven Method. Michael Meares has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win too.
[06:42.500 --> 06:48.500]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[06:48.500 --> 06:54.500]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[06:54.500 --> 06:56.500]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports?
[06:56.500 --> 07:01.500]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[07:01.500 --> 07:06.500]  The Michael Meares Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[07:06.500 --> 07:14.500]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meares banner.
[07:14.500 --> 07:17.500]  Or email MichaelMeares at yahoo.com.
[07:17.500 --> 07:28.500]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[07:28.500 --> 07:36.500]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com
[07:58.500 --> 08:07.500]  Alright folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[08:07.500 --> 08:13.500]  If you want to call and ask a question or make a comment on anything you've got going on.
[08:13.500 --> 08:18.500]  Okay, so while I'm waiting for those callers, I want to go on with this a little bit.
[08:18.500 --> 08:25.500]  Now, the things that I've been working on through the course of this research and writing of the book and all this,
[08:25.500 --> 08:31.500]  and I know folks, it's taken a while, but believe me, it is not an easy task. It's not a simple task.
[08:31.500 --> 08:37.500]  I've got a plethora of notes, but I have to keep going back and updating those notes whenever something changes,
[08:37.500 --> 08:50.500]  which the way they do it in Texas legislature, like I say, they can set it up for each session where a new law or part of a law will take effect at some point during the next two years.
[08:50.500 --> 08:59.500]  So what I'm writing at the end of a session in the beginning may be completely different by the start of the next new session,
[08:59.500 --> 09:11.500]  because it's changed three times at different points over the last two years, because it went into each stage of it went into effect at different times.
[09:11.500 --> 09:16.500]  And it's ridiculous for that to be how they do these things.
[09:16.500 --> 09:25.500]  Yes, they are required by the Constitution to put a specific delay on things from the time it's enacted in order to give proper public notice of it,
[09:25.500 --> 09:33.500]  but to have it happen throughout different parts of the year, that's going a little bit too far.
[09:33.500 --> 09:39.500]  Your session begins and ends here, then your laws, if they're going to have an effect for the next two years,
[09:39.500 --> 09:48.500]  they need to all be in place and set by that timeframe from the end of that session, not arbitrary timeframe through the course of the year,
[09:48.500 --> 09:56.500]  because all that does is make the law even more difficult to stay abreast of and to understand,
[09:56.500 --> 10:08.500]  because some cop is enforcing January's version without bothering to know that now here in November it's got 13 different paragraphs in it that completely change how he thinks it works.
[10:08.500 --> 10:12.500]  And he hadn't bothered to go read it to find that out.
[10:12.500 --> 10:19.500]  Not that he ever read it the first time, but you kind of get my point, okay?
[10:19.500 --> 10:24.500]  I love it when a cop says, do you think you know the law better than me?
[10:24.500 --> 10:26.500]  I just have to laugh.
[10:26.500 --> 10:33.500]  I would go, my dog knows the law better than you.
[10:33.500 --> 10:41.500]  You treat the law as how you think it works. You don't spend any time reading and studying it and researching it to understand how it truly works.
[10:41.500 --> 10:46.500]  You just go based upon your arbitrary skimming of it as to how you want it to work.
[10:46.500 --> 10:50.500]  Big difference in knowing the law and enforcing it the way you do it.
[10:50.500 --> 10:52.500]  Very big difference.
[10:52.500 --> 11:01.500]  Now, you want to argue about it in court? Let's go, bud. I'll prove I know it better than you.
[11:01.500 --> 11:04.500]  But see, that's the thing.
[11:04.500 --> 11:16.500]  The courts don't want you to bring the law into the court and argue why the law itself may be wrong or why the officer enforcing that law may be wrong according to that law.
[11:16.500 --> 11:20.500]  They don't want to hear those arguments because they're not set up to give a crap.
[11:20.500 --> 11:26.500]  They don't want to give a crap. There's no money in giving a crap.
[11:26.500 --> 11:38.500]  There's no money for state funding. There's no money for local funding and there's no money for their retirement and their current paycheck if they have to argue and listen to that crap and prove up their case.
[11:38.500 --> 11:42.500]  This is why there are so many losses in these courts.
[11:42.500 --> 11:55.500]  Because when we fail to follow the proper steps of procedure to document the case thoroughly in writing to make a record, they can do what they want and they will get away with it.
[11:55.500 --> 11:59.500]  Because there's nothing to contradict them in the record.
[11:59.500 --> 12:02.500]  You see?
[12:02.500 --> 12:07.500]  That's how the Third Court of Appeals does what it does with its decisions.
[12:07.500 --> 12:10.500]  I've taken all of its Perkins v. State cases.
[12:10.500 --> 12:27.500]  I've broken them down into their individual sections where each case is making the same argument as the other case is, so I can address those sections of those different cases at the same time in one place in what I'm writing.
[12:27.500 --> 12:42.500]  But the fact of the matter is, you don't have to do anything more than read the various statutes I'm going to be citing in my rebuttal of this to understand why the Third Court of Appeals is a bunch of frickin morons.
[12:42.500 --> 12:46.500]  They're just making it up as they go.
[12:46.500 --> 12:50.500]  They're not studying the law. They're not reading the law.
[12:50.500 --> 12:58.500]  They are cherry picking the law to support the outcome they want and the opinion proves that.
[12:58.500 --> 13:08.500]  Their own opinion proves that's exactly what they're doing and how they've done it.
[13:08.500 --> 13:17.500]  And everything I'm writing on those cases shows exactly why what they said and did in this case was completely wrong according to the law.
[13:17.500 --> 13:20.500]  The law says you have to do this. The court didn't do it.
[13:20.500 --> 13:25.500]  The law says the statutes must be read and interpreted in this fashion and written in this fashion.
[13:25.500 --> 13:37.500]  And the court did not read or interpret it in those fashions nor did they determine whether or not they were required to abide by how the legislature was required to write it, which they didn't.
[13:37.500 --> 13:44.500]  And we know this because the opinion says they didn't.
[13:44.500 --> 13:52.500]  They spoke out about how incompetent they truly are in their opinion.
[13:52.500 --> 13:58.500]  They provided evidence against themselves that is absolutely irrefutable.
[13:58.500 --> 14:10.500]  Now, I don't know about you, but when I'm thinking about a court that is trying to decide my fate about anything, I want the court to know the law and to follow the law.
[14:10.500 --> 14:16.500]  That's what I did or I wouldn't be there.
[14:16.500 --> 14:33.500]  Because I already knew they didn't have a case, but I'm here anyway because some moron in a uniform that thinks he knows what he's talking about accused me of breaking some rule that had no bearing on me whatsoever in the first place.
[14:33.500 --> 14:47.500]  And these people pick up on that same presumption and perpetrate it and continue it without any effort on their part to determine whether or not that original perception is even valid when it isn't.
[14:47.500 --> 14:52.500]  And once again, the law itself would clearly show that it isn't.
[14:52.500 --> 15:03.500]  They then build upon that perception they create and write these opinions that are ludicrous in the face of the law.
[15:03.500 --> 15:13.500]  Because when you compare their written opinion with what's actually written in the law, nothing about their opinion is right.
[15:13.500 --> 15:29.500]  That means that our courts are either incompetent, willfully ignorant, or corrupt, or some combination of all of the above.
[15:29.500 --> 15:35.500]  There is no honest mistake option in this.
[15:35.500 --> 15:46.500]  Because an honest mistake option would have involved them at least looking at the whole of the law and coming to an incorrect conclusion, but they don't.
[15:46.500 --> 16:00.500]  Their opinion very clearly shows they pick one piece, two piece, three piece, some of which are related and some which aren't, but they treat them as if those are the only things that determine the answer they gave in the opinion.
[16:00.500 --> 16:04.500]  And it's not.
[16:04.500 --> 16:07.500]  So that is not an honest mistake.
[16:07.500 --> 16:25.500]  That's judicial incompetence in how to read and interpret the law and how to apply it and how to understand what the legislature intended when they wrote it.
[16:25.500 --> 16:37.500]  The way our courts are failing us is exactly what's going to benefit the socialist agenda in this country.
[16:37.500 --> 16:45.500]  Because the courts no longer look at the law in a relation to individual rights and the Constitution.
[16:45.500 --> 16:49.500]  They look at the law in a vacuum.
[16:49.500 --> 17:03.500]  Okay, it's like another article I was reading today on where the statement was made by the court that there cannot be under the doctrine of qualified immunity.
[17:03.500 --> 17:10.500]  There has to be a balancing test between rights and effective policing.
[17:10.500 --> 17:23.500]  When you're ignoring the rights in favor of effective policing, you are choosing to read or create effective policing in a vacuum.
[17:23.500 --> 17:39.500]  Absent the individual rights because nowhere does the Bill of Rights or any provision of any Constitution say the courts have the power to determine whether or not a right is being properly exercised.
[17:39.500 --> 17:45.500]  Or reaches this particular state of things.
[17:45.500 --> 17:54.500]  The one thing we do know is that a right is a right until it collides with the rights of another.
[17:54.500 --> 18:06.500]  That is the only time government has the legal and legitimate authority to intercede to resolve the dispute that has arisen from that collision of rights.
[18:06.500 --> 18:17.500]  It's the only time they have no right to create an issue between us and itself out of thin air.
[18:17.500 --> 18:20.500]  Which is exactly what they do with the transportation code.
[18:20.500 --> 18:25.500]  When they failed to prove that we're engaged in an activity, they have the power to regulate.
[18:25.500 --> 18:29.500]  Alright folks, take another break. We'll be right back.
[18:29.500 --> 18:36.500]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving under the blood alcohol limit.
[18:36.500 --> 18:42.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers and a government cover-up in a moment.
[18:42.500 --> 18:48.500]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[18:48.500 --> 18:53.500]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[18:53.500 --> 19:01.500]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[19:01.500 --> 19:09.500]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[19:09.500 --> 19:12.500]  Start over with StartPage.
[19:12.500 --> 19:21.500]  Ever hear the term fine farming? It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue and it's apparently big business in the Sunshine State of Florida.
[19:21.500 --> 19:27.500]  This case involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[19:27.500 --> 19:31.500]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were improperly calibrated.
[19:31.500 --> 19:35.500]  State officials knew about it for two and a half years, but did nothing.
[19:35.500 --> 19:41.500]  In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not to document the problem.
[19:41.500 --> 19:49.500]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life, but now that the cover-up has been exposed, perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[19:49.500 --> 19:54.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[20:20.500 --> 20:25.500]  I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[20:25.500 --> 20:50.500]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[20:55.500 --> 21:03.500]  The Redemption with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[21:03.500 --> 21:08.500]  You can get your own copy of this valuable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[21:08.500 --> 21:15.500]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[21:15.500 --> 21:18.500]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[21:18.500 --> 21:22.500]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[21:22.500 --> 21:29.500]  Order your copy today and together we can have the first society we all want and deserve.
[21:29.500 --> 21:55.500]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadionetwork.com.
[21:55.500 --> 22:04.500]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984.
[22:04.500 --> 22:07.500]  You want to call in? Now would be a good time.
[22:07.500 --> 22:17.500]  Okay, now when we sit around and we watch the things that are happening around us, what is going through your mind?
[22:17.500 --> 22:25.500]  I know what's going through mine. I know how it makes me feel. I know what it makes me want to say and do.
[22:25.500 --> 22:28.500]  But how is it affecting you?
[22:28.500 --> 22:34.500]  Are you as outraged as I am about some of the things you see and hear our public officials doing?
[22:34.500 --> 22:40.500]  No matter what level they're doing it at, whether it be the cop on the street all the way up to the legislator,
[22:40.500 --> 22:47.500]  when they feel they have a right to do something that adversely affects any of us in any capacity,
[22:47.500 --> 22:55.500]  when we've done nothing that would harm, could be considered harmful to another person or individual,
[22:55.500 --> 23:05.500]  but they're going to use what they do against us anyway to punish us for something they perceive as an issue that no one else has an issue with.
[23:05.500 --> 23:17.500]  And even if someone else does have an issue, if it violates your rights for them to enforce their issue upon you, where do they get that power?
[23:17.500 --> 23:23.500]  Because my reading of the Constitution and understanding of what it means is that they never had it.
[23:23.500 --> 23:30.500]  They didn't get it because they never had it and we never gave it to them.
[23:30.500 --> 23:39.500]  See, there's something wrong with the way a court functions when it says at one level that because this thing says you can do only these things,
[23:39.500 --> 23:45.500]  that's the only thing you can do, thus it's a Constitution of limited power and authority.
[23:45.500 --> 23:55.500]  And yet at the state level when you write a Constitution that does exactly the same thing, it's a Constitution that doesn't have limited authority.
[23:55.500 --> 24:03.500]  It stays free to do anything that it wants to do if it's not specifically prohibited from doing it by the Constitution.
[24:03.500 --> 24:14.500]  It's exactly the opposite of the thing that they determined before was limited.
[24:14.500 --> 24:30.500]  When you look at how law is done, you come to realize that law for the most part is intentionally written to provide latitude and interpretation so that it can cover things that are not specifically spelled out in it
[24:30.500 --> 24:34.500]  but are egregious enough to fall within its purview.
[24:34.500 --> 24:44.500]  The problem is when the powers that be that use that law decide to use it in ways it was never intended to work simply because they can.
[24:44.500 --> 24:49.500]  Okay? For instance, the civil asset forfeiture laws.
[24:49.500 --> 25:03.500]  They know damn good and well those laws were written specifically and strictly for people that were charged with crimes involving drug trafficking and drug trade.
[25:03.500 --> 25:23.500]  Now they use it to simply accuse anyone of carrying any amount of money or by falsely claiming their dogs have alerted on some part of their car to harass people and steal property in the name of enforcing the law.
[25:23.500 --> 25:35.500]  When a law allows its intended purpose to be distorted and corrupted to that degree, that law is no longer valid in my opinion.
[25:35.500 --> 25:47.500]  If you read the Constitution and the jurisprudence on the Bill of Rights, you'll find out that my opinion is well grounded on exactly how the Constitution says it works.
[25:47.500 --> 25:57.500]  My rights are not subject to your desires or your fears or your apprehensions.
[25:57.500 --> 26:04.500]  They are mine regardless of what you may think or feel about them.
[26:04.500 --> 26:29.500]  And you are not allowed to harm them or take them away from me in any way if you cannot first show that I have either directly used or negligently or recklessly used my free exercise of a right to interfere with another's exercise of their rights.
[26:29.500 --> 26:38.500]  And again, rights in this respect are not limited to just those that we believe like the right to bear arms and blah, blah, blah.
[26:38.500 --> 26:44.500]  It is the ones that encompass everything involving your person, your property, and your rights.
[26:44.500 --> 26:47.500]  I can't come up and punch you in the face for no good reason.
[26:47.500 --> 26:56.500]  I can't rob your property by burglarizing your home or your car or stealing off your front porch, things of that nature.
[26:56.500 --> 27:03.500]  So when I'm using rights in that regard, I am rolling it all up into one big ball of wax here.
[27:03.500 --> 27:20.500]  So if I don't do something that infringes upon your rights in some way that causes you harm, then the state has no legitimate grounds to be moving against me, period.
[27:20.500 --> 27:27.500]  And they would have no legitimate grounds to do so based upon even your desire that it do so.
[27:27.500 --> 27:42.500]  Just because you feel slighted by what you think and perceive, I did that you believe violated your rights, but it actually didn't.
[27:42.500 --> 27:58.500]  We have allowed the government to get too big for its bridges and too big to control at even the local level anymore without a large uprising of people to put a stop to it.
[27:58.500 --> 28:02.500]  Now, American history shows it's been done.
[28:02.500 --> 28:04.500]  It's definitely been done.
[28:04.500 --> 28:07.500]  It's how the country got started.
[28:07.500 --> 28:22.500]  It's what's had to happen numerous times when public officials have violated every part of their oath and their duty to the people to do what they wanted instead of what they were required to do.
[28:22.500 --> 28:28.500]  And still, we the people are doing nothing.
[28:28.500 --> 28:30.500]  We're crying on our pillow at night.
[28:30.500 --> 28:31.500]  We're griping about it.
[28:31.500 --> 28:32.500]  We're complaining about it.
[28:32.500 --> 28:36.500]  We're shouting to the rooftops about it.
[28:36.500 --> 28:41.500]  But we're not doing anything.
[28:41.500 --> 28:43.500]  We're not visiting our legislators.
[28:43.500 --> 28:49.500]  We're not moving to petition and have them removed from office.
[28:49.500 --> 29:05.500]  See, there are so many things that our government forgets about what power the people have by trying to use our Constitution against us while ignoring our attempts to use it to control them.
[29:05.500 --> 29:08.500]  I want to say the Constitution doesn't say you have that right.
[29:08.500 --> 29:11.500]  Therefore, you don't have it.
[29:11.500 --> 29:13.500]  Newsflash, moron.
[29:13.500 --> 29:17.500]  The Constitution was never the source of my rights.
[29:17.500 --> 29:29.500]  And whether it says I have the right to do something or not is completely irrelevant because it was never intended to limit my power to do a damn thing.
[29:29.500 --> 29:39.500]  It was intended specifically to prohibit you and those like you from doing the things you are doing to me.
[29:39.500 --> 29:45.500]  You idiot.
[29:45.500 --> 30:00.500]  See, I think I would be perfectly justified in grabbing any attorney or legislator by the throat and just smacking them as hard as I could when stuff like that comes out of their mouth.
[30:00.500 --> 30:05.500]  And if I ever get to change the Bill of Rights, I'm damn sure going to put that in there.
[30:05.500 --> 30:30.500]  We have the right to beat bloody any public official or card carrying attorney who dares to insinuate the Constitution controls the actions of the people as individuals and has no power in effect upon them as government actors.
[30:30.500 --> 30:51.500]  I'm going to put that in the Bill of Rights. We not only have the right to beat the living tar out of them, we have the right to use any amount of force necessary to subdue an apprehend, including the use of lethal force, any public official that performs their duties in a fashion that violates the rights of an individual.
[30:51.500 --> 30:58.500]  Period.
[30:58.500 --> 31:05.500]  There was no reason why the constitutions could not have had things like that in them to begin with.
[31:05.500 --> 31:22.500]  But like I said, most things like that are written in a general sense so that they can be given the widest possible interpretation to encompass things the way they ought to, rather than being strictly limited to the specific language that it contains.
[31:22.500 --> 31:30.500]  By spelling out a list of things, or numerating certain things, so on and so forth.
[31:30.500 --> 31:52.500]  And you can see that the debates in the original constitutional convention were very, very accurate when the dissenters of the Bill of Rights said, enumerating one right will lead future areas of government to perceive this as the only rights available.
[31:52.500 --> 31:55.500]  And that's exactly how the courts have started treating it.
[31:55.500 --> 32:02.500]  If the Constitution doesn't say you can do it, then we don't have to rule that you can.
[32:02.500 --> 32:09.500]  And that's BS people, because the constitutions were not written to limit us.
[32:09.500 --> 32:18.500]  Not we the people in our individual capacities doing our personal business and pleasure ever.
[32:18.500 --> 32:20.500]  Think about that.
[32:20.500 --> 32:27.500]  Let's take another break, 512-646-1984. Let's get some callers on the board.
[32:50.500 --> 32:55.500]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[32:55.500 --> 33:01.500]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[33:01.500 --> 33:10.500]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[33:10.500 --> 33:20.500]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[33:20.500 --> 33:28.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[33:28.500 --> 33:33.500]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[33:33.500 --> 33:37.500]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick.
[33:37.500 --> 33:42.500]  I'd be lost without logos, and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[33:42.500 --> 33:49.500]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite, and I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[33:49.500 --> 33:51.500]  How can I help logos?
[33:51.500 --> 33:56.500]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[33:56.500 --> 33:58.500]  You can order them in your supplies or holiday gifts.
[33:58.500 --> 34:00.500]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[34:00.500 --> 34:03.500]  Now, go to www.LogosRegular Network.com.
[34:03.500 --> 34:06.500]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[34:06.500 --> 34:12.500]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[34:12.500 --> 34:13.500]  Do I pay extra?
[34:13.500 --> 34:14.500]  No.
[34:14.500 --> 34:16.500]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[34:16.500 --> 34:17.500]  No.
[34:17.500 --> 34:18.500]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[34:18.500 --> 34:19.500]  No.
[34:19.500 --> 34:20.500]  I mean, yes.
[34:20.500 --> 34:26.500]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[34:26.500 --> 34:27.500]  You're welcome.
[34:27.500 --> 34:56.500]  Happy Holidays, logos.
[34:56.500 --> 34:58.500]  Folks, this is Rule of Law Radio.
[34:58.500 --> 35:03.500]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[35:03.500 --> 35:06.500]  All right.
[35:06.500 --> 35:15.500]  Now, the more we look at the things that are occurring right now, the more you can see that people are just not paying attention.
[35:15.500 --> 35:21.500]  They don't understand the rights, and unfortunately, most of them don't seem to actually care.
[35:21.500 --> 35:26.500]  So, when I look around and I see these things, it bothers me.
[35:26.500 --> 35:36.500]  I don't know what I'm going to be able to do about it, especially if I feel like I have to do it by myself, which is how I feel most of the time.
[35:36.500 --> 35:37.500]  Okay?
[35:37.500 --> 35:46.500]  Because I look at this and I talk to people, and when you show them something that is absolutely irrefutable common sense and they balk at it,
[35:46.500 --> 35:56.500]  you know right then and there, this is not someone that you could depend upon to do what has to be done to stop what's coming.
[35:56.500 --> 35:59.500]  They just aren't.
[35:59.500 --> 36:14.500]  It's one thing to be part of a unit on a battlefield. It's another thing to be the only person on the battlefield facing down the other side's army.
[36:14.500 --> 36:28.500]  Not that there aren't men who aren't willing to do it, but no one wants to be that one lone guy standing up against the world to do what's right.
[36:28.500 --> 36:40.500]  And if you want the real version of the zombie apocalypse, you're living in it.
[36:40.500 --> 36:47.500]  Every neighbor you see with a Biden Harris sign, zombie.
[36:47.500 --> 36:54.500]  Every person you see with a Trump sign, zombie. Why? Because none of them are working for us.
[36:54.500 --> 36:58.500]  We are the only ones willing to work for us.
[36:58.500 --> 37:12.500]  We're the only ones that understands what's affecting us. These people don't know. And most importantly, they don't care.
[37:12.500 --> 37:17.500]  They don't care because it doesn't fit in with the agenda they're driving.
[37:17.500 --> 37:25.500]  And the agenda they're driving at the very end is meant to serve their ends, not ours.
[37:25.500 --> 37:36.500]  And if you are still living and foolish enough after all this time to think otherwise, you have really not been paying attention.
[37:36.500 --> 37:43.500]  That's a sad statement to have to tell your grandkids or your children, I wasn't paying attention.
[37:43.500 --> 37:50.500]  They came right up and took it all away from us because I wasn't paying attention. I'm the blame for this.
[37:50.500 --> 37:55.500]  And that's if you're willing to admit it. Most of you won't.
[37:55.500 --> 38:02.500]  Most of your zombie neighbors never will. They'll never ever understand why I was wrong to begin with.
[38:02.500 --> 38:09.500]  And there in people lies the problem.
[38:09.500 --> 38:18.500]  There is so much misinformation and false education going on about the things and how they work and who's responsible, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[38:18.500 --> 38:27.500]  We can't tell sunrise from sunset in this country anymore.
[38:27.500 --> 38:38.500]  People just don't know what to believe and they don't have the brains enough to figure it out for themselves about whether or not it's believable.
[38:38.500 --> 38:44.500]  And I for one cannot understand that. I cannot relate to that.
[38:44.500 --> 38:52.500]  Like I said before, you can't piss on my boots and tell me it's raining and make me believe you.
[38:52.500 --> 38:59.500]  I'm just not buying it, folks.
[38:59.500 --> 39:10.500]  But so many of the folks around here and out there in the world, that's exactly what they do.
[39:10.500 --> 39:15.500]  Why? Why are you allowing this to happen?
[39:15.500 --> 39:29.500]  Where is your brain that you would not see this for what it is simply because it benefits you in some way despite who else it harms and how many?
[39:29.500 --> 39:36.500]  As long as you get something out of it that's favorable to you, you'll let it go.
[39:36.500 --> 39:42.500]  That makes you a terrible freaking human being.
[39:42.500 --> 39:50.500]  When you're willing to sacrifice everyone else for your own ends and your own betterment, you're a terrible human being.
[39:50.500 --> 39:55.500]  And I want nothing to do with you.
[39:55.500 --> 40:02.500]  And I don't care if you're my neighbor or someone sitting in one of these high offices.
[40:02.500 --> 40:10.500]  I don't care and I don't want anything to do with you.
[40:10.500 --> 40:16.500]  All right. Looks like we finally got some callers up on the board. Let's see. Who do we got up here first?
[40:16.500 --> 40:24.500]  It looks like we have Ted in Utah as our first caller. Ted, what do you got?
[40:24.500 --> 40:26.500]  Hello?
[40:26.500 --> 40:28.500]  Hello?
[40:28.500 --> 40:30.500]  Hello?
[40:30.500 --> 40:32.500]  Yeah.
[40:32.500 --> 40:34.500]  Are you on a cell phone?
[40:34.500 --> 40:36.500]  Yes, I am. It's the only phone I've got.
[40:36.500 --> 40:42.500]  Okay. Well, you keep trying to be still because you keep fading out as soon as you speak, you disappear.
[40:42.500 --> 40:44.500]  Oh, sorry.
[40:44.500 --> 40:46.500]  That's okay. So what you got?
[40:46.500 --> 40:52.500]  I need to know the elements in a defile emotion.
[40:52.500 --> 40:56.500]  What do you mean the elements defile emotion?
[40:56.500 --> 41:06.500]  I need to file a motion on fair and speedy trials, but I can't find anything written on how to file one. I can find the law.
[41:06.500 --> 41:10.500]  I hereby move the court to provide me with a fair and speedy trial.
[41:10.500 --> 41:14.500]  And what state are you in, Utah?
[41:14.500 --> 41:16.500]  Yes.
[41:16.500 --> 41:24.500]  Okay. Then what under the Utah Rules of Procedure constitutes a speedy trial? What timeframe do they have to prosecute a certain kind of offense and to file a complaint for that offense?
[41:24.500 --> 41:28.500]  It's 70 days and they're passed for 70 now.
[41:28.500 --> 41:32.500]  And what have they filed?
[41:32.500 --> 41:34.500]  Nothing.
[41:34.500 --> 41:42.500]  Then you don't move for a fair and speedy trial, you move to dismiss for failure to comply with the procedural rule that it be filed within 70 days.
[41:42.500 --> 41:44.500]  Yes.
[41:44.500 --> 41:54.500]  Well, that's not a motion for a fair and speedy trial. That is a motion to dismiss going past the statute of limitations.
[41:54.500 --> 41:56.500]  That's what I meant to say.
[41:56.500 --> 42:02.500]  Okay. Well, then you need to look at what the rules of procedure are in the state and you need to cite that rule.
[42:02.500 --> 42:10.500]  That rule has the elements. You are required to file a complaint for this type of offense. By this time, the offense occurred on such and such date.
[42:10.500 --> 42:20.500]  We are now at this date, which exceeds the enumerated number of days in this specific section of law and therefore can no longer be prosecuted.
[42:20.500 --> 42:26.500]  I hereby move the court to dismiss this case with prejudice. That's it.
[42:26.500 --> 42:38.500]  All right. Well, I think I can handle that. So I'll put the law in stating that it had 70 days and they did not meet that requirement.
[42:38.500 --> 42:48.500]  You need to state the date when the offense occurred. You need to make sure that the law that you're referencing says from the date of the offense or from the date of the complaint.
[42:48.500 --> 43:00.500]  Okay. You need to know which of those it says because if they have 70 days from the date they file the complaint, but they've got up to two years to file the complaint, then your argument is going to fall flat on its face.
[43:00.500 --> 43:10.500]  You need to make sure you understand what the rules are. Does the rule say that they have to both file the complaint and prosecute the case within 70 days?
[43:10.500 --> 43:26.500]  Or does it say they have to file the complaint and begin the prosecution within 70 days? Or does it say that they've got two years to file the complaint, but once it's filed, they've only got 70 days to prosecute for this type of offense?
[43:26.500 --> 43:30.500]  You need to know which one of those it says and how it works.
[43:30.500 --> 43:42.500]  All right. Yeah. All I looked up was the fair and speedy trial law. It was 70 days from when I was in court and the complaint not guilty and asked for a jury trial.
[43:42.500 --> 43:54.500]  Well, again, if you're looking at the speedy trial from how long they have to actually prosecute a case, those are two very different arguments and two very different laws.
[43:54.500 --> 44:02.500]  Okay. Okay. Fair and speedy trial may not even be set in statute. It may be set by court opinion.
[44:02.500 --> 44:11.500]  For instance, here in Texas, the Texas Supreme Court says a fair and speedy trial for a Class C misdemeanor, if they go three months, they're okay.
[44:11.500 --> 44:16.500]  If they go five months, they've gone too long, making four months the sweet spot.
[44:16.500 --> 44:34.500]  So if they file the complaint but do nothing for four months, then they violated your right to a speedy trial. The caveat to that is, is that you must have previously filed a motion within that initial period demanding your right to a speedy trial and then they didn't meet it.
[44:34.500 --> 44:43.500]  But if you fail to file that motion, then they didn't violate any speedy trial request and therefore they did nothing wrong.
[44:43.500 --> 44:54.500]  You get what I'm saying? Well, the way I read the law, unless you waive your right, they had 70 days to file it or to try it.
[44:54.500 --> 45:01.500]  If the statute says the right exists regardless of whether or not you file the motion, then you are correct.
[45:01.500 --> 45:05.500]  But if it doesn't say that, you will need to do both.
[45:05.500 --> 45:18.500]  But if they're past the statute of limitations, the speedy trial argument is moot. The statute of limitations on prosecution is what would matter in that regard, okay?
[45:18.500 --> 45:31.500]  Now, if they have a longer period of time to do the speedy trial and they did everything right for the prosecution, then your argument on speedy trial is you didn't give me my speedy trial within a set number of days.
[45:31.500 --> 45:38.500]  If the statute says you had 70 days period from the day of the filing in order to do it and you didn't do it.
[45:38.500 --> 45:39.500]  All right.
[45:39.500 --> 45:54.500]  But you need to make sure that the courts of your state have not interpreted that statute the way I'm talking about, that you had to file a written motion within that 70-day period and then they failed to comply.
[45:54.500 --> 45:56.500]  Okay.
[45:56.500 --> 46:02.500]  Well, I'll proceed with, I'll reread it, make sure.
[46:02.500 --> 46:05.500]  But the way I read it, they had.
[46:05.500 --> 46:14.500]  Again, don't just trust what you're reading. Look up the court cases that have decided how to interpret that statute.
[46:14.500 --> 46:15.500]  Okay.
[46:15.500 --> 46:20.500]  I guarantee you there's going to be some if it's a speedy trial statute.
[46:20.500 --> 46:29.500]  So you need to look up the court cases in your state that deal with interpreting that specific statute so that you know whether or not what I said is true.
[46:29.500 --> 46:33.500]  Do you have to file that motion or does the statute clearly state?
[46:33.500 --> 46:35.500]  You don't have to file a motion to protect that right.
[46:35.500 --> 46:36.500]  It's automatic.
[46:36.500 --> 46:38.500]  If it's automatic, you're fine.
[46:38.500 --> 46:44.500]  If it's not, then you've got to file a motion demanding writing speedy trial.
[46:44.500 --> 46:47.500]  And then the clock starts over again.
[46:47.500 --> 46:55.500]  If you file that, unless the statute itself again sets a different specific limitation, they can't go beyond.
[46:55.500 --> 47:00.500]  There's lots to this, so don't just presume you've got it worked out by what you're reading there.
[47:00.500 --> 47:04.500]  Find the court cases because I'm guaranteeing you there are some.
[47:04.500 --> 47:07.500]  How do I find court cases then?
[47:07.500 --> 47:16.500]  Well, you're going to either have to look it up on Lexis-Nexis for your state at which you can do it a state law library or you're going to go down to a law library at a university and look in their law books.
[47:16.500 --> 47:25.500]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[47:25.500 --> 47:33.500]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[47:33.500 --> 47:36.500]  Enter the recovery version.
[47:36.500 --> 47:45.500]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[47:45.500 --> 47:55.500]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[47:55.500 --> 48:00.500]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[48:00.500 --> 48:15.500]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[48:15.500 --> 48:18.500]  That's freestudybible.com.
[48:18.500 --> 48:33.500]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[48:33.500 --> 48:48.500]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals, gold at $1,429 an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel,
[48:48.500 --> 49:04.500]  Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31,
[49:04.500 --> 49:13.500]  and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[49:13.500 --> 49:25.500]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade,
[49:25.500 --> 49:27.500]  killing 10 and injuring 40.
[49:27.500 --> 49:32.500]  Today in history.
[49:32.500 --> 49:46.500]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing hemp into taxes law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones,
[49:46.500 --> 49:52.500]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the year for THC.
[49:52.500 --> 50:01.500]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[50:01.500 --> 50:15.500]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works,
[50:15.500 --> 50:29.500]  as well as other cities too, like the district attorney in El Paso, Kyma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[50:29.500 --> 50:40.500]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[50:40.500 --> 50:50.500]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[50:50.500 --> 51:06.500]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[51:06.500 --> 51:21.500]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[51:21.500 --> 51:37.500]  This is Book Roadie with your lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[51:51.500 --> 52:03.500]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[52:03.500 --> 52:06.500]  All right, we are still on with Ted in Utah.
[52:06.500 --> 52:10.500]  All right, Ted, we said we wrapped this up for you.
[52:10.500 --> 52:28.500]  You need to go to either a university that's close by you that's got a law library and talk to the librarian about the specific statute and ask them to help you find current case law or existing case law relative to that statute that interprets how that statute is to be read and applied.
[52:28.500 --> 52:46.500]  Okay. And the law library, if any one of them you find, especially at the university or a state law library, will probably have a subscription to Lexus Nexus where they can show you how to look up the case law specifically for that and get printed copies of it.
[52:46.500 --> 52:50.500]  Okay, I'll do that.
[52:50.500 --> 53:05.500]  Okay, and then you need to thoroughly read those cases, thoroughly read them and make sure that you cite something out of that case that is favorable to what you want, but that is also relevant to the outcome of the opinion.
[53:05.500 --> 53:11.500]  They don't like it when you use dicta and they like to try to say something's dicta even when it's not.
[53:11.500 --> 53:22.500]  So make sure you understand what you're reading. Again, the librarians at these law libraries are extremely helpful if you'll just utilize them as a resource.
[53:22.500 --> 53:26.500]  All right. I'll do that.
[53:26.500 --> 53:27.500]  Okay.
[53:27.500 --> 53:29.500]  All right. Thank you very much.
[53:29.500 --> 53:31.500]  Yes, sir. Good luck.
[53:31.500 --> 53:32.500]  Yeah. Bye.
[53:32.500 --> 53:33.500]  Bye bye.
[53:33.500 --> 53:39.500]  All right. Now we have Robert in California. Looks like Robert, are you there?
[53:39.500 --> 53:40.500]  I'm here.
[53:40.500 --> 53:43.500]  All right. What do you got?
[53:43.500 --> 53:57.500]  I want to find out. I was in court and the judge, when I asked him how he changed the charge from misdemeanor to infraction, he said it was a court rule.
[53:57.500 --> 54:14.500]  And I said, well, I'm not familiar with that rule. So he had the clerk print up what he called the rule and I looked at it and I said, I told him, this is policy.
[54:14.500 --> 54:17.500]  And he said, yeah, it's policy.
[54:17.500 --> 54:24.500]  I said, if I objected to it, him using policy to prosecute me.
[54:24.500 --> 54:32.500]  Anyway, when I wait a minute, they were lowering it to a lesser offense and you were objecting to that.
[54:32.500 --> 54:33.500]  Yes.
[54:33.500 --> 54:35.500]  Well, here's the problem.
[54:35.500 --> 54:43.500]  The court, whatever if it's actually a court, only has jurisdiction that it's given by law.
[54:43.500 --> 54:54.500]  And in the cases of those little commissioners, courts like that, their jurisdiction is limited strictly to infractions. They can't prosecute any actual crimes or any actual civil matters.
[54:54.500 --> 55:01.500]  They can only do administrative matters over the specific things they are given jurisdiction of.
[55:01.500 --> 55:13.500]  They don't have the jurisdiction and authority to change a charge defense. Only the prosecutor or the one making the allegation can say, wait, I did it wrong.
[55:13.500 --> 55:15.500]  Okay.
[55:15.500 --> 55:24.500]  So these little, the so-called court, which you're in California, right? And this is over a traffic infraction, right?
[55:24.500 --> 55:26.500]  Well, yeah, right.
[55:26.500 --> 55:31.500]  Okay. So this court doesn't have the power to change it.
[55:31.500 --> 55:44.500]  What they can say is you should never have been charged under this because the act itself was never a misdemeanor. It was always an infraction. That's why we have jurisdiction of it.
[55:44.500 --> 55:54.500]  But if they're trying to say their court policy allows them to change it of their own volition, that's not right. They have no power to do that.
[55:54.500 --> 56:08.500]  Well, and that's what I knew that when he, because I kept buzzing him, well, by whose authority they can do it, but they have to get my consent. That's the way the law reads.
[56:08.500 --> 56:18.500]  Wait a minute. What do you mean they have to get your consent to lower the charges against you? Why would they need your consent to say we can't charge you with A, we have to charge you with B?
[56:18.500 --> 56:34.500]  Because a misdemeanor, a felony to a misdemeanor they can do, but a misdemeanor to an infraction they can't do without your consent because they've been charged with a misdemeanor.
[56:34.500 --> 56:36.500]  Oh, wait a minute. Wait a minute.
[56:36.500 --> 56:44.500]  Okay. First off, what kind of appearance was this? Were you in an actual court of record?
[56:44.500 --> 56:49.500]  Were you in front of some moron sitting at a folding table in a chair?
[56:49.500 --> 56:55.500]  No, no. I have an audio of the proceeding from the court.
[56:55.500 --> 56:59.500]  The audio won't tell me what you're seeing.
[56:59.500 --> 57:06.500]  Oh, there was a judge sitting at a bench in Baylor and other people in the courtroom.
[57:06.500 --> 57:11.500]  So you were in an actual courtroom. Was there a court reporter there?
[57:11.500 --> 57:19.500]  No, they haven't recorded though. I recorded it, but they also recorded it.
[57:19.500 --> 57:29.500]  See, I've appealed this, his decision, and they sent me a clerk's transcript.
[57:29.500 --> 57:46.500]  And my call is about the clerk's transcript because I want to ask you is the letter that I talked about that he presented in the court that he said that I said this is policy.
[57:46.500 --> 58:01.500]  When I entered it into the case, when I did an objection, a written objection to the implying me guilty, and then I appealed it.
[58:01.500 --> 58:08.500]  But when I did that, I put the letter that he, the policy that he had given me.
[58:08.500 --> 58:17.500]  I entered that back into the case because in my objection, I objected to them using policy to prosecute me.
[58:17.500 --> 58:27.500]  And him, I was objecting to them lowering it from a misdemeanor to an infraction without my consent.
[58:27.500 --> 58:40.500]  And when I got the clerk's transcript, some things weren't in there that I had entered into the case.
[58:40.500 --> 58:46.500]  Well, the transcript won't have things you entered unless you did them verbally in open court.
[58:46.500 --> 58:52.500]  Are you saying the transcript doesn't have something that you or some of the other people said?
[58:52.500 --> 59:00.500]  It's a, they call it the clerk's transcript when you go to appeals court.
[59:00.500 --> 59:02.500]  I understand what they call it.
[59:02.500 --> 59:04.500]  That's not my question.
[59:04.500 --> 59:09.500]  You're saying that there's something missing from it that you put into the case.
[59:09.500 --> 59:13.500]  I'm asking you what you mean by put into the case.
[59:13.500 --> 59:22.500]  Is the transcript missing something that was said by somebody in that courtroom in relation to this case?
[59:22.500 --> 59:27.500]  Or is it not making reference to some written thing you filed in the case?
[59:27.500 --> 59:40.500]  It's making, in the clerk's transcript, the letter that the judge had given me that the court, it was the court's policy
[59:40.500 --> 59:44.500]  that they could change it from a misdemeanor to an infraction.
[59:44.500 --> 59:49.500]  That letter was not in the court's, the clerk's transcript.
[59:49.500 --> 59:50.500]  Wait a minute.
[59:50.500 --> 59:56.500]  A transcript is a written record of verbal proceedings.
[59:56.500 --> 59:59.500]  That's what a transcript is.
[59:59.500 --> 01:00:10.500]  A transcript is a part of the official records of the proceeding which will have more than just a transcript in it.
[01:00:10.500 --> 01:00:14.500]  That is to be forwarded for the purpose of an appeal.
[01:00:14.500 --> 01:00:23.500]  So the fact that the letter you were given a hard copy of is not in the transcript does not surprise me and would be irrelevant
[01:00:23.500 --> 01:00:31.500]  because it's a separate record that was filed into the case that would be in the packet of records that would be sent up for the appeal.
[01:00:31.500 --> 01:00:36.500]  It wouldn't be in the transcript because it wasn't oral testimony.
[01:00:36.500 --> 01:00:45.500]  That packet you're talking about in California, they call that the clerk's transcript of appeal.
[01:00:45.500 --> 01:00:56.500]  It has every paper that I've entered into the case in it, but the one that I entered that was the judge's policy.
[01:00:56.500 --> 01:00:57.500]  How did you enter it?
[01:00:57.500 --> 01:00:59.500]  The clerk said, what's that?
[01:00:59.500 --> 01:01:02.500]  How did you enter it?
[01:01:02.500 --> 01:01:08.500]  I went up to the clerk and they stamped it and gave me back my stamped copy.
[01:01:08.500 --> 01:01:14.500]  Okay, and you're saying that it's not in the packet of information that they're sending up to the court.
[01:01:14.500 --> 01:01:21.500]  It would be to file a written objection stating that the clerk has tampered with the record, that the record is incomplete.
[01:01:21.500 --> 01:01:26.500]  Okay, and who would I file that with, the presiding judge?
[01:01:26.500 --> 01:01:32.500]  You filed the same court and demanded it be included into the packet going to the appellate court.
[01:01:32.500 --> 01:01:34.500]  Oh, okay, okay, okay.
[01:01:34.500 --> 01:01:46.500]  And then the other thing that was missing, and I did object to that already, was that my written objection was about five pages long.
[01:01:46.500 --> 01:01:58.500]  And when I got that transcript of appeal, the whole packet, they only had the cover letter, you know, the front sheet, so I objected to that.
[01:01:58.500 --> 01:02:07.500]  And I wanted the whole thing, the whole objection, written objections in there for the appellate court to look at, the appeals court to look at.
[01:02:07.500 --> 01:02:19.500]  So I've objected to that, and I'm waiting to get that, but I was more curious about that letter, why that wasn't in there.
[01:02:19.500 --> 01:02:26.500]  Well, unless you actually got it in as evidence, then it's not admissible as evidence.
[01:02:26.500 --> 01:02:42.500]  You would have had to have got it admitted using evidence, the rules of evidence saying that this is relevant to this case because the court is using it to give itself a power without my consent that I didn't authorize, which by law they must have my authorization to do.
[01:02:42.500 --> 01:02:43.500]  Right.
[01:02:43.500 --> 01:02:47.500]  That's what I said basically to them.
[01:02:47.500 --> 01:02:56.500]  But so what I should have done when he turned to the clerk and he said, I asked him, can I have this copy?
[01:02:56.500 --> 01:03:00.500]  And he turned to the clerk and she said yes, he said yes.
[01:03:00.500 --> 01:03:04.500]  Well, at that point, I should have entered it in as evidence.
[01:03:04.500 --> 01:03:15.500]  No, you should have put it in as evidence with your written motion, but there's nothing attached to it for you to enter it as evidence in the case right then and there, you'd have to show how it was relevant.
[01:03:15.500 --> 01:03:21.500]  What they're doing in the prosecution versus the charges against you, there are two separate issues.
[01:03:21.500 --> 01:03:28.500]  They're violating your rights, which is a separate issue from them prosecuting you for a traffic infraction.
[01:03:28.500 --> 01:03:29.500]  Right.
[01:03:29.500 --> 01:03:41.500]  They're not the same argument, but you can show that the conviction of the traffic infraction is illegal because they violated your rights to get it.
[01:03:41.500 --> 01:03:42.500]  Right.
[01:03:42.500 --> 01:03:43.500]  You know what I'm saying?
[01:03:43.500 --> 01:03:44.500]  Exactly what I'm doing.
[01:03:44.500 --> 01:03:45.500]  All right.
[01:03:45.500 --> 01:03:57.500]  So you can also try filing a writ of mandamus with the appellate court, not the trial court, requesting that they order the lower court to provide all documents from the record.
[01:03:57.500 --> 01:04:07.500]  Not a partial tampered with record like they've done or attempting to do, but the complete record that has everything.
[01:04:07.500 --> 01:04:20.500]  I had a lot of fire into somebody's butt when the appellate court is told that the lower court is withholding parts of the record in order to sustain a conviction that was illegally obtained.
[01:04:20.500 --> 01:04:23.500]  Oh, okay.
[01:04:23.500 --> 01:04:24.500]  Yeah, good.
[01:04:24.500 --> 01:04:28.500]  I'm glad I called.
[01:04:28.500 --> 01:04:30.500]  Okay.
[01:04:30.500 --> 01:04:32.500]  Yeah, that sounds like fun.
[01:04:32.500 --> 01:04:34.500]  It's a lot of fun if you do it right.
[01:04:34.500 --> 01:04:36.500]  Judge, what's that?
[01:04:36.500 --> 01:04:39.500]  It's a lot of fun if you do it right.
[01:04:39.500 --> 01:04:41.500]  Well, yeah.
[01:04:41.500 --> 01:04:43.500]  Well, I'm going to try.
[01:04:43.500 --> 01:04:46.500]  The judge has, you know, I told you about this.
[01:04:46.500 --> 01:04:50.500]  This judge didn't let me cross-examine the cop.
[01:04:50.500 --> 01:04:53.500]  He didn't let me enter evidence.
[01:04:53.500 --> 01:04:55.500]  He didn't let me call witnesses.
[01:04:55.500 --> 01:04:57.500]  Then this was not a judicial court.
[01:04:57.500 --> 01:05:01.500]  There's no way a judicial court could get away with that.
[01:05:01.500 --> 01:05:07.500]  Well, so what can I do?
[01:05:07.500 --> 01:05:08.500]  Yes.
[01:05:08.500 --> 01:05:11.500]  Okay.
[01:05:11.500 --> 01:05:12.500]  All right.
[01:05:12.500 --> 01:05:13.500]  Okay.
[01:05:13.500 --> 01:05:14.500]  Well, is there anything else?
[01:05:14.500 --> 01:05:15.500]  Because I got to take a break here.
[01:05:15.500 --> 01:05:16.500]  Okay.
[01:05:16.500 --> 01:05:17.500]  All right.
[01:05:17.500 --> 01:05:18.500]  I'll talk to you soon.
[01:05:18.500 --> 01:05:19.500]  All right.
[01:05:19.500 --> 01:05:20.500]  Thanks for calling.
[01:05:20.500 --> 01:05:21.500]  All right, folks.
[01:05:21.500 --> 01:05:22.500]  We're going to take a break.
[01:05:22.500 --> 01:05:23.500]  512-646-1984.
[01:05:23.500 --> 01:05:24.500]  Give us a call.
[01:05:24.500 --> 01:05:25.500]  Get in line.
[01:05:25.500 --> 01:05:32.500]  We'll be right back.
[01:05:55.500 --> 01:06:02.500]  We'll be right back.
[01:06:25.500 --> 01:06:32.500]  We'll be right back.
[01:06:55.500 --> 01:07:02.500]  We'll be right back.
[01:07:25.500 --> 01:07:32.500]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:07:55.500 --> 01:08:02.500]  All right, folks.
[01:08:02.500 --> 01:08:03.500]  We are back.
[01:08:03.500 --> 01:08:05.500]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:08:05.500 --> 01:08:10.500]  The call-in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:08:10.500 --> 01:08:11.500]  Give us a call.
[01:08:11.500 --> 01:08:12.500]  Get in line.
[01:08:12.500 --> 01:08:13.500]  Let's talk.
[01:08:13.500 --> 01:08:14.500]  All right.
[01:08:14.500 --> 01:08:17.500]  Next caller up on the board appears to be Truth Raider.
[01:08:17.500 --> 01:08:19.500]  Raider, what can I do for you?
[01:08:19.500 --> 01:08:22.500]  I got a couple of questions for you tonight, Eddie.
[01:08:22.500 --> 01:08:23.500]  I wasn't going to call.
[01:08:23.500 --> 01:08:25.500]  But he said, come on, folks.
[01:08:25.500 --> 01:08:27.500]  I need to have some callers on the board here.
[01:08:27.500 --> 01:08:28.500]  512-646-1984.
[01:08:28.500 --> 01:08:29.500]  All right.
[01:08:29.500 --> 01:08:30.500]  All right.
[01:08:30.500 --> 01:08:32.500]  I'll bug him for a couple of minutes.
[01:08:32.500 --> 01:08:36.500]  What did they teach you when you learned to be a sheriff's deputy?
[01:08:36.500 --> 01:08:39.500]  What did they teach you specifically about the public?
[01:08:39.500 --> 01:08:45.500]  Was there any secrets that they didn't want the public to know about the Silly Billions
[01:08:45.500 --> 01:08:46.500]  rights?
[01:08:46.500 --> 01:08:48.500]  Do people really do have rights?
[01:08:48.500 --> 01:08:50.500]  What did they teach you?
[01:08:50.500 --> 01:08:53.500]  Well, that was quite a while ago, Raider.
[01:08:53.500 --> 01:08:59.500]  But there was nothing overt about it that says you get to treat the public like garbage.
[01:08:59.500 --> 01:09:01.500]  You're superior to them.
[01:09:01.500 --> 01:09:02.500]  You have rights they don't.
[01:09:02.500 --> 01:09:05.500]  There was nothing like that in any of the material.
[01:09:05.500 --> 01:09:06.500]  All right.
[01:09:06.500 --> 01:09:10.500]  And they didn't tell you anything that, well, you people think that they have certain rights.
[01:09:10.500 --> 01:09:13.500]  But that only applies to this, that, and the other and such.
[01:09:13.500 --> 01:09:15.500]  But it doesn't apply in certain things to this nature of that.
[01:09:15.500 --> 01:09:16.500]  That kind of a thing.
[01:09:16.500 --> 01:09:20.500]  Did they ever do that saying that there is certain things that the public doesn't really
[01:09:20.500 --> 01:09:21.500]  truly know?
[01:09:21.500 --> 01:09:22.500]  Did they ever teach you that?
[01:09:22.500 --> 01:09:27.500]  They give you instruction on how the courts have interpreted certain rights.
[01:09:27.500 --> 01:09:33.500]  That doesn't mean the court was correct, but that's what they do.
[01:09:33.500 --> 01:09:34.500]  All right.
[01:09:34.500 --> 01:09:37.500]  Here's something that's not talked about very much.
[01:09:37.500 --> 01:09:40.500]  We don't own that money.
[01:09:40.500 --> 01:09:42.500]  It's a borrowed financial instrument.
[01:09:42.500 --> 01:09:44.500]  That's not a question, Raider.
[01:09:44.500 --> 01:09:47.500]  What is your questions?
[01:09:47.500 --> 01:09:49.500]  You must agree with that.
[01:09:49.500 --> 01:09:50.500]  It's not ours.
[01:09:50.500 --> 01:09:52.500]  It's a borrowed currency.
[01:09:52.500 --> 01:09:55.500]  And they have the right to take it when they fill it.
[01:09:55.500 --> 01:10:00.500]  I don't agree with it because it's not a currency.
[01:10:00.500 --> 01:10:02.500]  The legal tender.
[01:10:02.500 --> 01:10:06.500]  It's not that either according to the Constitution.
[01:10:06.500 --> 01:10:08.500]  They don't follow the Constitution.
[01:10:08.500 --> 01:10:15.500]  The Constitution says it shall be coined in silver and gold, shall be the currency.
[01:10:15.500 --> 01:10:16.500]  No.
[01:10:16.500 --> 01:10:17.500]  Listen carefully.
[01:10:17.500 --> 01:10:27.500]  What it says is that no state shall make any form of payment for a debt, anything other
[01:10:27.500 --> 01:10:29.500]  than gold and silver coin.
[01:10:29.500 --> 01:10:35.500]  Doesn't say the only kind of money allowed anywhere to anybody is gold and silver coin.
[01:10:35.500 --> 01:10:45.500]  It says that no state may use any means of any kind as payment for a debt other than gold or silver coin.
[01:10:45.500 --> 01:10:50.500]  There's a big difference there in perception and reality.
[01:10:50.500 --> 01:10:52.500]  Okay.
[01:10:52.500 --> 01:10:54.500]  Here's the caveat.
[01:10:54.500 --> 01:10:56.500]  It's borrowed.
[01:10:56.500 --> 01:10:58.500]  We're charged interest on that.
[01:10:58.500 --> 01:11:00.500]  So we're borrowing it.
[01:11:00.500 --> 01:11:02.500]  We don't truly own it.
[01:11:02.500 --> 01:11:17.500]  We're borrowing it for our needs, for our financial needs in lieu of real money or property or anything of value that translates into money.
[01:11:17.500 --> 01:11:21.500]  If you didn't own it, then you couldn't dispose of it.
[01:11:21.500 --> 01:11:26.500]  That's part of the rules of ownership.
[01:11:26.500 --> 01:11:36.500]  If you didn't own it, you do not have the right to do anything with it other than possess it and make legitimate use of it for its intended purpose.
[01:11:36.500 --> 01:11:44.500]  But the intended purpose can never be one of transfer of the property if you don't own it.
[01:11:44.500 --> 01:11:54.500]  So you can't transfer that Confederate reserve note without actually owning it.
[01:11:54.500 --> 01:12:00.500]  The difference there is how value is added to that note.
[01:12:00.500 --> 01:12:06.500]  You're incorrect in your presumption of how value is added to a US Federal Reserve note.
[01:12:06.500 --> 01:12:08.500]  Okay.
[01:12:08.500 --> 01:12:14.500]  The value is achieved by the exchange of your labor to acquire that piece of paper.
[01:12:14.500 --> 01:12:23.500]  That's how that paper obtained its value through the expenditure of your labor to acquire it.
[01:12:23.500 --> 01:12:26.500]  Yeah.
[01:12:26.500 --> 01:12:27.500]  Okay.
[01:12:27.500 --> 01:12:33.500]  So they provide you with a central bank note in lieu of that, though, is what I'm saying.
[01:12:33.500 --> 01:12:37.500]  In lieu of that what?
[01:12:37.500 --> 01:12:42.500]  What does in lieu of that? What is that?
[01:12:42.500 --> 01:12:48.500]  Would be what real currency would be, barter, property or gold or silver coin.
[01:12:48.500 --> 01:12:52.500]  Barter is not a currency. Barter is a method of exchange.
[01:12:52.500 --> 01:12:54.500]  Yes.
[01:12:54.500 --> 01:13:00.500]  That's a person's exchanged value is the concept.
[01:13:00.500 --> 01:13:05.500]  Now what you're bartering with is the currency.
[01:13:05.500 --> 01:13:10.500]  Barter is a process, not a thing.
[01:13:10.500 --> 01:13:12.500]  Yes.
[01:13:12.500 --> 01:13:17.500]  Anyhow, they're charging interest on every one of those notes.
[01:13:17.500 --> 01:13:21.500]  And they're taught, apparently in these lower courts, they're taught in these lower courts.
[01:13:21.500 --> 01:13:27.500]  These, whatever, these attorneys in a row, pro tems or traffic commissioners, however,
[01:13:27.500 --> 01:13:32.500]  that they can go after that currency because they got to keep that money moving.
[01:13:32.500 --> 01:13:34.500]  They got to keep the notes moving.
[01:13:34.500 --> 01:13:43.500]  And so they're granted the privilege of deceiving us out of that reserve note.
[01:13:43.500 --> 01:13:46.500]  What are you basing this on?
[01:13:46.500 --> 01:13:49.500]  This is common sense.
[01:13:49.500 --> 01:13:52.500]  Who's common sense?
[01:13:52.500 --> 01:13:57.500]  For a traffic infraction, all the stuff they're doing, they cannot put us in a cage.
[01:13:57.500 --> 01:14:00.500]  They can't do anything to our body.
[01:14:00.500 --> 01:14:07.500]  But they're given the right to take away the federal reserve notes that we have and we possess because we're only borrowing them.
[01:14:07.500 --> 01:14:09.500]  And it's fair game for them to take.
[01:14:09.500 --> 01:14:11.500]  We don't have the right to keep possession.
[01:14:11.500 --> 01:14:21.500]  Raider, how many times have we been through the applicability of the law to an individual versus someone engaged in the privileged activity that it actually regulates?
[01:14:21.500 --> 01:14:24.500]  How many times have we been through that?
[01:14:24.500 --> 01:14:27.500]  Several times, but I can see it, plain as day.
[01:14:27.500 --> 01:14:28.500]  Okay.
[01:14:28.500 --> 01:14:29.500]  Let's stop.
[01:14:29.500 --> 01:14:34.500]  Let me ask the question, you answer it, and let me move on from there, okay?
[01:14:34.500 --> 01:14:40.500]  If you've seen that, please explain how that supports your theory of common sense.
[01:14:40.500 --> 01:14:47.500]  Whoever's common sense, you think this is as to how you're explaining it.
[01:14:47.500 --> 01:14:55.500]  How can they have the power to do something to us using a law that doesn't apply to us?
[01:14:55.500 --> 01:14:59.500]  How is that a legitimate power?
[01:14:59.500 --> 01:15:00.500]  Okay.
[01:15:00.500 --> 01:15:01.500]  Good question.
[01:15:01.500 --> 01:15:04.500]  Here's my answer to that.
[01:15:04.500 --> 01:15:08.500]  If they're able to do that, they're taught to do something like that.
[01:15:08.500 --> 01:15:12.500]  Where are you getting the idea they're taught to do something like that?
[01:15:12.500 --> 01:15:14.500]  That's important to understand.
[01:15:14.500 --> 01:15:19.500]  They do this all, they do, come on.
[01:15:19.500 --> 01:15:25.500]  I mean, they don't pay attention to anything I bring to court, any motion or anything I do.
[01:15:25.500 --> 01:15:30.500]  What does that have to do with how you're saying this works?
[01:15:30.500 --> 01:15:32.500]  They're after that money.
[01:15:32.500 --> 01:15:40.500]  Of course they're after that money, but your explanation about what they're doing to get it isn't making sense to me.
[01:15:40.500 --> 01:15:43.500]  So I'm asking you to explain it.
[01:15:43.500 --> 01:15:53.500]  You came up with it somehow, so give me the logical progression to how you got there, based on what?
[01:15:53.500 --> 01:15:58.500]  They're taught something different that we're not privy to know what they are taught.
[01:15:58.500 --> 01:16:01.500]  Yeah, they're frickin' stupid.
[01:16:01.500 --> 01:16:02.500]  Yeah.
[01:16:02.500 --> 01:16:06.500]  Where is that a delegated power?
[01:16:06.500 --> 01:16:07.500]  Yeah.
[01:16:07.500 --> 01:16:08.500]  Yeah.
[01:16:08.500 --> 01:16:13.500]  No public servant is given the delegated power to be stupid.
[01:16:13.500 --> 01:16:15.500]  They just are.
[01:16:15.500 --> 01:16:16.500]  Yeah.
[01:16:16.500 --> 01:16:25.500]  They presume to know more than they do, and they're arrogant about what they think they know to the degree that they will never admit they don't know it to begin with.
[01:16:25.500 --> 01:16:35.500]  Thus they're corrupt, not only in their life, but in how they perform their official duties, which still does not jive through the argument you're making.
[01:16:35.500 --> 01:16:51.500]  Well, it does, because if this is a mass in every state and every one of these lower court, all the way across the country and across the world, somebody is teaching them something that we don't know anything about, don't you think?
[01:16:51.500 --> 01:16:53.500]  Not necessarily.
[01:16:53.500 --> 01:17:04.500]  I think they can see that they can get away with this as long as the courts themselves are making rules that they're not allowed to make, and they get to interpret them and apply them the way they want at the lower level.
[01:17:04.500 --> 01:17:07.500]  Why wouldn't they take advantage of that?
[01:17:07.500 --> 01:17:09.500]  That's what's going on.
[01:17:09.500 --> 01:17:11.500]  That's exactly what's going on.
[01:17:11.500 --> 01:17:14.500]  Yeah, it's something that is taught.
[01:17:14.500 --> 01:17:30.500]  There doesn't have to be somebody teaching them this for that to be the case. Any corrupt individual that can create a loophole based upon what they can find and put together to defend them when they use that loophole, anyone's capable of that.
[01:17:30.500 --> 01:17:34.500]  They don't have to be taught that thing.
[01:17:34.500 --> 01:17:50.500]  It's what more structured than any of us know about. There is some type of a process that allows them and has the confidence to know that there are rulings that are going to be upheld.
[01:17:50.500 --> 01:17:58.500]  Yeah, there is a process, but I don't think you understand what it is, but guess what? I do. It's called law school.
[01:17:58.500 --> 01:18:05.500]  Law school is what indoctrinates these morons into their way of thinking about how this works.
[01:18:05.500 --> 01:18:17.500]  Well, maybe that's what they're taught in law school, but we don't know that citizens don't want any money, and we can go after it as much as we want as much as we think that it's better than to take from them.
[01:18:17.500 --> 01:18:23.500]  I don't think that's the case, but hang on. We'll be right back after this break.
[01:18:23.500 --> 01:18:35.500]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number, and date of birth, but you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:18:35.500 --> 01:19:04.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll see more in just a moment.
[01:19:06.500 --> 01:19:16.500]  Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere, but just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:19:16.500 --> 01:19:24.500]  I lay blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write N slash A for not applicable, and usually nobody notices or cares.
[01:19:24.500 --> 01:19:31.500]  I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement,
[01:19:31.500 --> 01:19:37.500]  and I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me, and that's pretty rare.
[01:19:37.500 --> 01:19:42.500]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:19:42.500 --> 01:19:46.500]  It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:19:46.500 --> 01:19:59.500]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:19:59.500 --> 01:20:03.500]  I lost my son, my uncle, on September 11, 2001.
[01:20:03.500 --> 01:20:07.500]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:20:07.500 --> 01:20:11.500]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:20:11.500 --> 01:20:15.500]  I will be official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[01:20:15.500 --> 01:20:21.500]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[01:20:21.500 --> 01:20:24.500]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:20:24.500 --> 01:20:29.500]  Go to BuildingWhat.org, why it's health, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:20:29.500 --> 01:20:33.500]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:20:33.500 --> 01:20:38.500]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[01:20:38.500 --> 01:20:41.500]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:20:41.500 --> 01:20:45.500]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:20:45.500 --> 01:20:48.500]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:20:48.500 --> 01:20:54.500]  The traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:20:54.500 --> 01:20:59.500]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:20:59.500 --> 01:21:03.500]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[01:21:03.500 --> 01:21:09.500]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:21:09.500 --> 01:21:14.500]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[01:21:14.500 --> 01:21:19.500]  and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:21:19.500 --> 01:21:23.500]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com.
[01:21:23.500 --> 01:21:27.500]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:21:27.500 --> 01:21:39.500]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:21:57.500 --> 01:22:20.500]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:22:20.500 --> 01:22:24.500]  We've got a half an hour left in the show, and we really need some more callers on the board.
[01:22:24.500 --> 01:22:28.500]  Alright, while we're waiting, back to Truth Raider.
[01:22:28.500 --> 01:22:29.500]  Alright Raider.
[01:22:29.500 --> 01:22:30.500]  Here I am.
[01:22:30.500 --> 01:22:35.500]  Yeah, Eddie, did you ever see this video? There's a video once that was put out.
[01:22:35.500 --> 01:22:40.500]  And it was inserted in one of these conspiracy videos and such.
[01:22:40.500 --> 01:22:47.500]  And it apparently was a classroom, I'm not sure who was being taught, some form of law enforcement.
[01:22:47.500 --> 01:22:51.500]  Or they were agents or FBI agents, I don't know exactly what they were.
[01:22:51.500 --> 01:22:58.500]  But there was a teacher, along with a teacher with a whiteboard, that they were marking things down and they were saying,
[01:22:58.500 --> 01:23:02.500]  these are the Founding Fathers. The Founding Fathers were terrorists. Did you know that?
[01:23:02.500 --> 01:23:05.500]  Did you ever see a video like that that was saying that the Founding Fathers were terrorists?
[01:23:05.500 --> 01:23:09.500]  Yes, I've seen the YouTube video where that's going on. What about it?
[01:23:09.500 --> 01:23:13.500]  Right, right. Do you agree with that? Do you think that that's true?
[01:23:13.500 --> 01:23:18.500]  What do you think, Raider? Do I sound like somebody that agrees with that?
[01:23:18.500 --> 01:23:29.500]  I would hope so. That's all indoctrination. It's mis indoctrination of our public officials.
[01:23:29.500 --> 01:23:32.500]  Then why would I agree with it?
[01:23:32.500 --> 01:23:41.500]  I'm not saying if you agree with that. I'm saying do you agree that that's wrong? Do you agree that that's subversion?
[01:23:41.500 --> 01:23:48.500]  I agree that it's setting the stage for treating people like they're something they're not.
[01:23:48.500 --> 01:23:50.500]  There you go.
[01:23:50.500 --> 01:23:53.500]  I agree that it's bad training.
[01:23:53.500 --> 01:24:02.500]  Yeah, yeah. We're the enemy and anyone that has provided the structure of the government that we've had
[01:24:02.500 --> 01:24:09.500]  and the Constitution Bill rights and the whole thing were corrupted individuals in the first place and they were terrorists.
[01:24:09.500 --> 01:24:12.500]  That's what they're being taught.
[01:24:12.500 --> 01:24:18.500]  Well, a lot of these officials and law enforcement agents and whoever they may be, that's what they're being taught to them.
[01:24:18.500 --> 01:24:29.500]  Yeah, and the moment that that was what they were being taught is the moment that instructor should have either been fired or cut loose from his contract and never hired again.
[01:24:29.500 --> 01:24:38.500]  You have to remember that most of the people giving these classes are private entities teaching government officials.
[01:24:38.500 --> 01:24:39.500]  Yeah.
[01:24:39.500 --> 01:24:47.500]  Okay, and most of the people that own these private entities are themselves ex-government officials in some capacity.
[01:24:47.500 --> 01:24:55.500]  And the problem is they treated their job before they got out of it the same way they're treating this training that they're giving these other people.
[01:24:55.500 --> 01:25:07.500]  Right then and there everything they ever did while in office should have been questioned, investigated and a determination made whether or not charges should have ever been filed for their actions in the past.
[01:25:07.500 --> 01:25:09.500]  Yeah.
[01:25:09.500 --> 01:25:17.500]  In which case they should be blacklisting from ever serving in any capacity in any government contract whatsoever.
[01:25:17.500 --> 01:25:19.500]  Exactly.
[01:25:19.500 --> 01:25:23.500]  But I'm not in charge of making those rules, am I?
[01:25:23.500 --> 01:25:25.500]  No, of course not.
[01:25:25.500 --> 01:25:29.500]  Okay, then why would you ask me if I agree with it?
[01:25:29.500 --> 01:25:31.500]  I don't agree with it.
[01:25:31.500 --> 01:25:39.500]  Do you agree that that is subversion and that's treason against the people, sedition, all of that?
[01:25:39.500 --> 01:25:44.500]  It's not treason if you're talking about treason as defined by the Constitution.
[01:25:44.500 --> 01:25:46.500]  Right.
[01:25:46.500 --> 01:25:48.500]  Yeah.
[01:25:48.500 --> 01:25:50.500]  There you go.
[01:25:50.500 --> 01:25:55.500]  The Constitution gives a very specific definition of treason.
[01:25:55.500 --> 01:26:04.500]  Anything that doesn't fit within the scope of that definition is not treason under the federal Constitution, which all the states are required to abide by.
[01:26:04.500 --> 01:26:07.500]  Sedition, however, is a very different matter.
[01:26:07.500 --> 01:26:14.500]  Sedition is an actual criminal charge that's incurred both at the federal and state levels.
[01:26:14.500 --> 01:26:16.500]  Yeah.
[01:26:16.500 --> 01:26:18.500]  It ain't really.
[01:26:18.500 --> 01:26:25.500]  The very people operating in government, regardless of their position, are absolutely guilty of sedition.
[01:26:25.500 --> 01:26:29.500]  But who is responsible for prosecuting them for those acts?
[01:26:29.500 --> 01:26:33.500]  The very people sitting beside them committing those same acts.
[01:26:33.500 --> 01:26:35.500]  Yeah.
[01:26:35.500 --> 01:26:40.500]  So we're back to government with do as I say, not as I do.
[01:26:40.500 --> 01:26:44.500]  We're back to government saying the laws apply to you, but not to me.
[01:26:44.500 --> 01:26:53.500]  Equal protection and application of the laws does not apply where we are concerned because we are not a part of you for whom we wrote the law.
[01:26:53.500 --> 01:26:57.500]  We consider ourselves above that law.
[01:26:57.500 --> 01:27:02.500]  And that goes to the entire thing I was saying at the very beginning of the show.
[01:27:02.500 --> 01:27:05.500]  What do you see when you look around?
[01:27:05.500 --> 01:27:07.500]  What does it make you feel like?
[01:27:07.500 --> 01:27:09.500]  Why do you think it's right or wrong?
[01:27:09.500 --> 01:27:13.500]  Why do you think that it's only good if it benefits you instead of everyone?
[01:27:13.500 --> 01:27:19.500]  Why are you willing to accept those who would harm others to satisfy your needs?
[01:27:19.500 --> 01:27:23.500]  Because if that's how you feel, you're a bad human being.
[01:27:23.500 --> 01:27:26.500]  Man, I agree with that.
[01:27:26.500 --> 01:27:28.500]  I agree with that.
[01:27:28.500 --> 01:27:35.500]  And I think it's the microcosm, how all of these officials have been trained.
[01:27:35.500 --> 01:27:47.500]  That's one thing. The microcosm, I think, is much more than that to it. There's got to be something going on where it's programmed into these officials, these attorneys, these whatever they are.
[01:27:47.500 --> 01:27:50.500]  Traffic commissioners wouldn't be any of those people.
[01:27:50.500 --> 01:27:54.500]  Whomever it is, they're being mistocked.
[01:27:54.500 --> 01:27:59.500]  Oh yeah, you got your rights all right, right this way.
[01:27:59.500 --> 01:28:05.500]  You have the responsibility to tell you, oh, you might have the right...
[01:28:05.500 --> 01:28:08.500]  It's like I said, as long as they have been shown that they can get away with what they do without repercussion, they're going to do it.
[01:28:08.500 --> 01:28:10.500]  Any criminal does that.
[01:28:10.500 --> 01:28:19.500]  When a criminal finds a system that favors their ability to do what they do, why would they buck it?
[01:28:19.500 --> 01:28:27.500]  Yeah, don't get rid of a good thing.
[01:28:27.500 --> 01:28:31.500]  What makes you think government operates any differently?
[01:28:31.500 --> 01:28:39.500]  It's the largest criminal organization in the entire globe. It's worldwide.
[01:28:39.500 --> 01:28:41.500]  That's right.
[01:28:41.500 --> 01:28:46.500]  So why do you think that isn't how it works?
[01:28:46.500 --> 01:28:57.500]  It is the way it is, because what you mentioned at the beginning, you're preamble at your initial bidrag. It's communism.
[01:28:57.500 --> 01:29:02.500]  We're going into a communist system. Well, we've always been in the communist system for at least the last 100 years.
[01:29:02.500 --> 01:29:09.500]  It's just going further and further and completing its whole mission in the process of becoming completely communist.
[01:29:09.500 --> 01:29:13.500]  That's what's happening.
[01:29:13.500 --> 01:29:21.500]  Well, again, I'm not sure that's what my entire diatribe was about, but it is where we're headed.
[01:29:21.500 --> 01:29:26.500]  Yeah, that's where it is. That's where we're headed.
[01:29:26.500 --> 01:29:32.500]  All right. Well, I chewed up enough time, so I just want to get those ideas so you get some questions and get your feedback.
[01:29:32.500 --> 01:29:42.500]  You know, to brainstorm a little bit about these ideas, whether we agree or not, we all do agree that there's something terribly wrong on a systemic level worldwide.
[01:29:42.500 --> 01:29:46.500]  Well, we both agree about that.
[01:29:46.500 --> 01:29:50.500]  Oh, yeah, there's something wrong. All right.
[01:29:50.500 --> 01:29:53.500]  All right. Well, this is my suggestion.
[01:29:53.500 --> 01:30:01.500]  And everyone should do sit down in a quiet place when you have time and say a prayer quietly.
[01:30:01.500 --> 01:30:14.500]  Listen to the prayer or the provenance of God to change it, to help you get the strength and to know what to do and have the courage and go do it.
[01:30:14.500 --> 01:30:16.500]  That's my plan.
[01:30:16.500 --> 01:30:19.500]  I think that's all we hope at this point.
[01:30:19.500 --> 01:30:25.500]  Outside of revolution.
[01:30:25.500 --> 01:30:28.500]  Well, let me know how that turns out for you.
[01:30:28.500 --> 01:30:32.500]  You do it too. You do to any of it and everyone do that quietly.
[01:30:32.500 --> 01:30:34.500]  You don't have to do that loud.
[01:30:34.500 --> 01:30:41.500]  You just have a sincere moment where you sit quietly and say a prayer to yourself quietly and see what happens.
[01:30:41.500 --> 01:30:44.500]  It might work.
[01:30:44.500 --> 01:30:47.500]  So my revolution.
[01:30:47.500 --> 01:30:50.500]  Yeah, yeah, or that is going to be a revolution.
[01:30:50.500 --> 01:30:54.500]  We don't want that either.
[01:30:54.500 --> 01:30:57.500]  Well, I think we want it.
[01:30:57.500 --> 01:31:00.500]  All right, my brother, I'm going to go ahead and jump and shoot up enough of your time.
[01:31:00.500 --> 01:31:06.500]  That's all I got for tonight. Good night and God bless and say your prayers, folks.
[01:31:06.500 --> 01:31:09.500]  All right, very good. Thanks for calling.
[01:31:09.500 --> 01:31:11.500]  You bet.
[01:31:11.500 --> 01:31:17.500]  All right. Well, we're about to come up on another break here and then we got one more segment left in the show.
[01:31:17.500 --> 01:31:25.500]  So if there's anybody that's still out there that wants to call in and talk, you've got one more segment, 15 minutes worth of time to get on the line and let's get that done.
[01:31:25.500 --> 01:31:28.500]  Otherwise, you won't see me until next Monday night.
[01:31:28.500 --> 01:31:36.500]  OK, so while we're waiting to see if anyone does that or for the break to come, whichever is first.
[01:31:36.500 --> 01:31:40.500]  I want you folks to understand I don't hate this country.
[01:31:40.500 --> 01:31:48.500]  I don't hate my fellow man, but I sure as hell don't understand the state of either one of them at this point.
[01:31:48.500 --> 01:31:59.500]  I cannot for the life of me understand the apathy, the ignorance, the the submissiveness.
[01:31:59.500 --> 01:32:02.500]  Just the pure leave me alone.
[01:32:02.500 --> 01:32:09.500]  I want to be a sheet mentality that has taken over the American people to such a degree.
[01:32:09.500 --> 01:32:17.500]  You can't even have a healthy debate on any subject without it breaking out into a fist fight or something similar.
[01:32:17.500 --> 01:32:23.500]  A bunch of hysterics you name it, somebody plopping down and crying, oh, yeah, I'm feeling it.
[01:32:23.500 --> 01:32:27.500]  Y'all hang on, we'll be right back after a break.
[01:32:27.500 --> 01:32:33.500]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:32:33.500 --> 01:32:38.500]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:32:38.500 --> 01:32:44.500]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:32:44.500 --> 01:32:52.500]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:32:52.500 --> 01:32:58.500]  Logo Radial Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:32:58.500 --> 01:33:01.500]  We have come to trust Jevity so much.
[01:33:01.500 --> 01:33:07.500]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:33:07.500 --> 01:33:15.500]  When you order from LogoRadialNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:33:15.500 --> 01:33:19.500]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:33:19.500 --> 01:33:28.500]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:33:28.500 --> 01:33:31.500]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:33:31.500 --> 01:33:42.500]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:33:42.500 --> 01:33:46.500]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:33:46.500 --> 01:33:50.500]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:33:50.500 --> 01:33:55.500]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:33:55.500 --> 01:34:01.500]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:34:01.500 --> 01:34:10.500]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:34:10.500 --> 01:34:19.500]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:34:19.500 --> 01:34:28.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:34:49.500 --> 01:35:01.500]  Alright folks, we are back. This is the last segment of the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig.
[01:35:01.500 --> 01:35:10.500]  Once again, folks, this was the November 30th, 2020 show, and I have tried very hard to get callers on tonight.
[01:35:10.500 --> 01:35:13.500]  And as you can tell, we've got a small smattering of them.
[01:35:13.500 --> 01:35:19.500]  I guess my continued absence is for one thing or another, make it where people don't know whether I'm ever actually here or not at the moment.
[01:35:19.500 --> 01:35:25.500]  And I do apologize for those, but there's an awful lot of stuff going on on my end of things.
[01:35:25.500 --> 01:35:35.500]  Not all of which are under my control, but some of which are controlling more of my time than I would otherwise normally have done.
[01:35:35.500 --> 01:35:40.500]  So I apologize for all that, but we are live tonight.
[01:35:40.500 --> 01:35:53.500]  Now, as we were in the last segment of the show and we have no more callers, I'm going to wrap this up by going into some of the same things I was going over at the beginning of the show
[01:35:53.500 --> 01:35:59.500]  to try to make you understand why it's important that we do something about this.
[01:35:59.500 --> 01:36:09.500]  Now, as you heard what Rader was going on about when he called in here, he calls in and he presents information rather than asking questions like he was supposed to do.
[01:36:09.500 --> 01:36:12.500]  But that's okay.
[01:36:12.500 --> 01:36:19.500]  The point is is that his perceptions of how things are operating are skewed.
[01:36:19.500 --> 01:36:24.500]  Now, I can't say why and I'm not trying to belittle him for his perceptions.
[01:36:24.500 --> 01:36:38.500]  My point is, however, is that it shows a lack of understanding of the reality of how things work and how the people involved in that reality do their job or don't do their job.
[01:36:38.500 --> 01:36:52.500]  See, this is one of the reasons why I adhere so strictly to their own written rules of procedure and everything that dictates how they have to perform their job.
[01:36:52.500 --> 01:37:13.500]  Because I can show via those rules where they are not following them and their lack of following them gives me a leverage that I would not otherwise have, that no one would have without knowing what those rules are.
[01:37:13.500 --> 01:37:24.500]  You couldn't appeal judicial error without being able to show why there was judicial error, how there was judicial error.
[01:37:24.500 --> 01:37:27.500]  And those rules are tantamount to doing that.
[01:37:27.500 --> 01:37:40.500]  Not just the rules of procedure themselves, but court opinions about those rules as well about how they're required to comply with them, interpret them, and use them.
[01:37:40.500 --> 01:37:48.500]  And when they fail to do those things, that's what gives you your leverage to appeal their decision and their action.
[01:37:48.500 --> 01:37:54.500]  It gives you the leverage to have it overturned.
[01:37:54.500 --> 01:38:05.500]  And yet, for the life of me, people are still coming up with these explanations that they can't support with any kind of actual verifiable proof.
[01:38:05.500 --> 01:38:10.500]  And again, that's okay. A theory starts somewhere.
[01:38:10.500 --> 01:38:17.500]  But if you're ever going to prove a theory, you'd down well better find some proof that it's right.
[01:38:17.500 --> 01:38:23.500]  Otherwise, it just remains a theory, period.
[01:38:23.500 --> 01:38:33.500]  And because it remains a theory, it's ineffective on their battleground, which are the courts.
[01:38:33.500 --> 01:38:41.500]  Okay, well, it seems like I picked up another couple of callers real quick, so let's start with the first one we got up here, which appears to be Noel.
[01:38:41.500 --> 01:38:44.500]  Noel, where are you calling from?
[01:38:44.500 --> 01:38:46.500]  Calling from British Columbia.
[01:38:46.500 --> 01:38:49.500]  All right, what can we do for you, sir?
[01:38:49.500 --> 01:39:06.500]  I just kind of go along with what you're saying there. It seems like if previous generations didn't tell me about the original right to travel freely, I wouldn't have known.
[01:39:06.500 --> 01:39:10.500]  Like, the wool was right over my eyes.
[01:39:10.500 --> 01:39:13.500]  I'm sure this is the case with most of the public.
[01:39:13.500 --> 01:39:20.500]  They believe they're driving. They believe they're operating a motor vehicle because that's the Kool-Aid they've been drinking.
[01:39:20.500 --> 01:39:37.500]  So I guess my real question is how, what's your take on how do you view the new enactments where they're saying that we have to wear masks, indoors, things like that?
[01:39:37.500 --> 01:39:42.500]  I don't view them at all because to me, they don't exist.
[01:39:42.500 --> 01:39:47.500]  Is it similar to the traffic where it applies to those operations?
[01:39:47.500 --> 01:39:54.500]  No, the traffic laws do exist, but they are limited in who they can be applied to and how.
[01:39:54.500 --> 01:40:04.500]  However, the mask mandates are not laws, and no one has the authority to make them a law, especially those that are trying to do so.
[01:40:04.500 --> 01:40:16.500]  Therefore, under the Constitution, they do not exist. Period. Under my exercise of my rights, they do not exist. Period.
[01:40:16.500 --> 01:40:18.500]  That's how I view it.
[01:40:18.500 --> 01:40:30.500]  Okay. So the powers that ought not be, though, they think that it exists. They have their, you know, their paper written out, signed by...
[01:40:30.500 --> 01:40:35.500]  Let's get in a fight in one of your courts and see which one of us is right.
[01:40:35.500 --> 01:40:43.500]  That's my response. You think you're right? Take me to court and let's find out.
[01:40:43.500 --> 01:40:54.500]  Right. Okay. So then in that case, it would be about dissecting that act that they're charging you under, trying to dig up all the definitions and what...
[01:40:54.500 --> 01:41:07.500]  I don't have to dissect it. All I have to do is point out that it directly violates by rights the Constitution and the delegated power of the people gave the government to do what they're doing, which is absolutely none of what they're doing.
[01:41:07.500 --> 01:41:14.500]  Okay. I comprehend what you're saying. Okay. Yeah.
[01:41:14.500 --> 01:41:30.500]  See, here in Texas, our Constitution under Article III has Section 56. Section 56 of our Constitution has an entire list of things that the state legislature is absolutely forbidden to create law relevant to.
[01:41:30.500 --> 01:41:32.500]  Okay. Okay.
[01:41:32.500 --> 01:41:50.500]  However, since the state legislature is the only body in the entire state that the people have delegated law making authority to, if the legislature can't make a law for it, neither can anyone else.
[01:41:50.500 --> 01:41:54.500]  End of discussion.
[01:41:54.500 --> 01:42:01.500]  Right. So it's just...
[01:42:01.500 --> 01:42:10.500]  So I... Yeah. I mean, they're still going to use it to scare people into being obedient and doing whatever they say.
[01:42:10.500 --> 01:42:17.500]  Well, that's the thing. If the sheep gets scared and complied, that's on the sheep. It ain't on me.
[01:42:17.500 --> 01:42:22.500]  Right. It all starts with the individual.
[01:42:22.500 --> 01:42:25.500]  Exactly. Always has.
[01:42:25.500 --> 01:42:27.500]  That's true. Yeah.
[01:42:27.500 --> 01:42:30.500]  Okay. Thank you, Eddie. Thanks for taking the call. I appreciate it.
[01:42:30.500 --> 01:42:33.500]  Sure. Thanks for calling.
[01:42:33.500 --> 01:42:39.500]  All right. Now we have Ted in Washington. Ted, I got four minutes.
[01:42:39.500 --> 01:42:42.500]  All right. I'm the last one. Thank you.
[01:42:42.500 --> 01:42:44.500]  Yes, sir. What can I do for you?
[01:42:44.500 --> 01:43:00.500]  All right. So would it be worthwhile to file the same motion to dismiss in a situation where the judge has already ruled against us? They're expecting payment, but somehow they're willing to see us again.
[01:43:00.500 --> 01:43:08.500]  Contacted the clerk and they said to write a letter to the judge asking for a new date, and that is actually...
[01:43:08.500 --> 01:43:11.500]  A new date for what?
[01:43:11.500 --> 01:43:19.500]  That's the theme, because I didn't want to say the word hearing, but a new date could be seen.
[01:43:19.500 --> 01:43:26.500]  So I'm wondering if, you know, maybe there's some confusion on my part, but I'm wondering if the judge might consider that as an ambush.
[01:43:26.500 --> 01:43:38.500]  Does Washington have a right to request a new trial under these cases? Whatever the case is you're talking about, do you have the right to request a new trial after a conviction has been had?
[01:43:38.500 --> 01:43:41.500]  That's a good question. I don't know.
[01:43:41.500 --> 01:43:53.500]  Okay. They may think that's what you're trying to do, but the thing is, is if you don't file the proper motion to get it, they're going to stomp on you like a cockroach when you get there.
[01:43:53.500 --> 01:43:58.500]  Got it. So we still need a motion at all times regardless of what...
[01:43:58.500 --> 01:44:07.500]  Anytime you're requesting the court to do something, you always do it in a motion. A motion is how you move the court. That's why it's called a motion.
[01:44:07.500 --> 01:44:09.500]  Right. I understand that, but they...
[01:44:09.500 --> 01:44:14.500]  Right. But you're saying you send a letter. A letter is not a motion.
[01:44:14.500 --> 01:44:16.500]  We both agree upon that.
[01:44:16.500 --> 01:44:29.500]  Okay. So what you need to do is find out first what the rules are. Are you required to request a motion or file a motion for new trial and have a hearing on that motion to get the court to grant it?
[01:44:29.500 --> 01:44:38.500]  And what judicial error or legal issue can you raise as proper grounds for getting a new trial?
[01:44:38.500 --> 01:44:50.500]  That's what it's all about. Now, considering that these are civil infractions in Washington, or at least most of them are, I don't know whether or not that is something that attaches in the cases there in Washington.
[01:44:50.500 --> 01:44:58.500]  That's why you have to look at the rules and procedure and find out. I'm simply asking, do you know whether or not that's the case?
[01:44:58.500 --> 01:45:03.500]  I understand. Okay. So research the rules of the court.
[01:45:03.500 --> 01:45:15.500]  Not just the rules of court, the rules of procedure. Since they treat these as civil infractions, not crimes, there's a set of rules for civil infractions they're required to follow to prosecute them.
[01:45:15.500 --> 01:45:32.500]  They may mirror or reference the same rules that are used to prosecute a criminal act. Okay. But you still need to see what the process is that it dictates they are required to follow because that is your golden key.
[01:45:32.500 --> 01:45:39.500]  Okay. Every time they screw up and follow in the rules, you need to take that key and poke them in the damn die with it.
[01:45:39.500 --> 01:45:48.500]  That's the thing. So research the rules of procedure and how it correlates with this court.
[01:45:48.500 --> 01:45:52.500]  Correct. Okay.
[01:45:52.500 --> 01:45:57.500]  Excellent. Well, yep. More research and again, thank you for taking my call. It's been an awful process.
[01:45:57.500 --> 01:46:00.500]  Yes, sir. Thank you for calling in.
[01:46:00.500 --> 01:46:02.500]  All right. Good night. Thanks again.
[01:46:02.500 --> 01:46:04.500]  All right. Good night and good luck.
[01:46:04.500 --> 01:46:05.500]  Appreciate that.
[01:46:05.500 --> 01:46:12.500]  All right, folks, I'm down to one minute before we get off the air here, but that's okay. I'm glad we had a last couple of callers.
[01:46:12.500 --> 01:46:21.500]  Now, I just want you to understand, folks, I love this country. I always have. I spent my whole life fighting for other people at my own expense, and I still do.
[01:46:21.500 --> 01:46:26.500]  And I'm not saying that to make people support me or be proud of me. I do it because it's who I am.
[01:46:26.500 --> 01:46:35.500]  I wish there was more like me in that regard, not because I'm a great individual, but just because I know myself to be a determined one.
[01:46:35.500 --> 01:46:41.500]  No matter what is coming against me, I'm not going to back off from it when I know I'm right.
[01:46:41.500 --> 01:46:48.500]  And therein is the problem with most people. They're too afraid of being wrong to insist on being right.
[01:46:48.500 --> 01:46:57.500]  They don't know enough. They don't want to know enough. They're happy in their ignorance and their apathy. And that's never been me.
[01:46:57.500 --> 01:47:08.500]  So, if you're one of those people, it's time to make a change. If you're one of those people like me, then it's time to stand up and use your voice and become proactive.
[01:47:08.500 --> 01:47:12.500]  All right, y'all have a great week. Good night and God bless.
[01:47:12.500 --> 01:47:25.500]  Bible for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:47:25.500 --> 01:47:35.500]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:47:35.500 --> 01:47:47.500]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:47:47.500 --> 01:47:57.500]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:47:57.500 --> 01:48:08.500]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:48:08.500 --> 01:48:27.500]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.