[00:00.000 --> 00:06.800]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[00:06.800 --> 00:13.200]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.200 --> 00:21.360]  Silver $16.45 an ounce, Copper $2.75 an ounce, Oil, Texas Crew $55.63 a barrel, Brent Crew
[00:21.360 --> 00:29.720]  $62.47 a barrel, and Crypto is an order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.720 --> 00:41.400]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:45.960 --> 00:52.680]  In history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb was detonated on
[00:52.680 --> 00:58.200]  Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and
[00:58.200 --> 01:07.400]  entering 40 today in history. In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill
[01:07.400 --> 01:12.600]  1325 legalizing heaven to tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state,
[01:12.600 --> 01:17.080]  including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and
[01:17.080 --> 01:21.560]  even refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or
[01:21.560 --> 01:26.680]  the laboratory equipment to test the herb for TAC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District
[01:26.680 --> 01:31.080]  Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery
[01:31.080 --> 01:36.280]  of marijuana cases because of the law. Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney
[01:36.280 --> 01:40.760]  General, stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana
[01:40.760 --> 01:45.640]  has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding
[01:45.640 --> 01:52.280]  of how HV1325 works, as well as other cities too, like the District Attorney in El Paso,
[01:52.280 --> 01:57.240]  Caima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote,
[01:57.240 --> 02:02.280]  will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However,
[02:02.280 --> 02:06.680]  the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.680 --> 02:11.160]  in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something
[02:11.160 --> 02:15.880]  illegal based on its chemical makeup. It's important that if someone is charged with something,
[02:15.880 --> 02:25.720]  the test matches what they're charged with. A paper by Tulane University identified a 5.5-inch
[02:25.720 --> 02:31.560]  American pocket shark. As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the
[02:31.560 --> 02:37.480]  second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979
[02:37.480 --> 02:42.200]  in the East Pacific Ocean. According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous
[02:42.200 --> 02:48.840]  fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey
[02:48.840 --> 03:12.840]  who may be drawn into the glow.
[03:18.840 --> 03:22.920]  This is what happens when you call the cops. You get to rights while I'm late and you all get
[03:22.920 --> 03:27.000]  shot. I'm sick of people being victimized by criminal cops. Psychopathic predators,
[03:27.000 --> 03:30.920]  terrorizing neighborhood glosses, equipped with pepper spray, mate, cuffs, tasers, and gloss.
[03:30.920 --> 03:35.080]  They like serial killers acting out subliminal thoughts. Forget what you talk. These cops have
[03:35.080 --> 03:39.080]  got a license to kill. Witness intimidation means that they can use it at will. Code of
[03:39.080 --> 03:42.600]  silence means that the pigs will never let out a squill. And if they go to court, they know
[03:42.600 --> 03:46.200]  the judge will make them a deal. For real, that's why they're stopping me, locking me up,
[03:46.200 --> 03:50.680]  stopping me, confiscating my property, talking to my demographers, making them poor commodities,
[03:50.680 --> 03:55.400]  profiting off of poverty, and forced to policy support and prison economy. Yeah, no one makes
[03:55.400 --> 03:59.880]  money when the violence stops, hating brutality is the way to make a criminal cry. Blood in the
[03:59.880 --> 04:04.200]  gut is how to risk whether they bread at the top. That's why this is what happens when you call the
[04:04.200 --> 04:09.080]  cops. This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:09.080 --> 04:13.080]  All right, folks. Good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host,
[04:13.080 --> 04:21.240]  Eddie Craig. It is July 13. Wow. We're almost halfway through the seventh month of the year.
[04:21.240 --> 04:26.280]  Folks, we just keep right on going, don't we? Now, I don't have a whole lot of extra stuff to talk
[04:26.280 --> 04:33.880]  about tonight. I do have the phone lines open if you want to call in 512-646-1984. However,
[04:33.880 --> 04:38.600]  until I do get some callers on the board, let's go over some of the things that are currently
[04:38.600 --> 04:44.600]  going on and understand what we should or should not be doing about them and who we should or should
[04:44.600 --> 04:50.760]  not be listening to. Now, my friend Dave Champion has been putting out a lot of videos and messages
[04:50.760 --> 05:00.520]  on Facebook that is going into the actual research on the actual numbers associated with COVID-19
[05:00.520 --> 05:08.280]  in every area, number of infections, number of tests, number of actual deaths, and absolutely
[05:08.280 --> 05:16.760]  nothing he is uncovering matches up with the agenda-driven narrative that most of these state
[05:16.760 --> 05:22.440]  governors and the federal government itself are using to get you to comply and bend to their will.
[05:22.440 --> 05:30.120]  The numbers are far, far lower than they want you to believe. The increased number of cases
[05:30.120 --> 05:36.760]  is not number of cases. It's number of people that have tested positive, which they're calling a
[05:36.760 --> 05:44.520]  case, whether it is whether they're asymptomatic or not. They're still claiming people that died
[05:44.520 --> 05:54.360]  from something other than COVID, COVID was the cause, and I only know of one person that I've
[05:54.360 --> 06:00.360]  actually personally met that is in the hospital because of this, and it was some sort of respiratory
[06:00.360 --> 06:07.480]  infection that he had before he wound up getting it complicated by the COVID virus. So this goes
[06:07.480 --> 06:11.960]  hand in hand with things that we've already known about the virus for a while, and that is
[06:11.960 --> 06:19.880]  those that are at the most risk are the ones with pre-existing health conditions, especially
[06:19.880 --> 06:26.440]  heart and respiratory conditions. They are the ones most susceptible to what this virus does.
[06:28.280 --> 06:34.200]  It's not your common average, healthy, everyday individual. That's why most little children
[06:34.200 --> 06:38.840]  don't have it. There's not nearly as many of them that have been on medications and everything
[06:38.840 --> 06:43.480]  else for all these decades that completely destroyed their body and their immune system
[06:43.480 --> 06:49.160]  to fight off something like this, and so they've developed these chronic illnesses that COVID can
[06:49.160 --> 06:57.480]  exacerbate. But for the most part, what you've been told about it is an absolute lie, and it
[06:57.480 --> 07:04.040]  was prearranged and ordained to be that way. I still got people trying to publicly shame me
[07:04.040 --> 07:09.320]  because I will not wear a face mask. I'm not walking around sneezing, coughing, throwing up,
[07:09.320 --> 07:18.520]  or spitting on people. I'm not a threat to your health. I'm not ill. Okay? So stop trying to tell
[07:18.520 --> 07:24.600]  me that I don't care about how everybody else is about things. If you're a person that is susceptible,
[07:24.600 --> 07:33.480]  then you have an obligation to yourself to not expose yourself to the public or to the public
[07:33.480 --> 07:42.520]  or to the conditions under which you could become further ill. It's that simple. If you are directly
[07:42.520 --> 07:49.800]  associated, you have children or other relatives that you see or work with on a regular basis or
[07:49.800 --> 07:55.560]  other ill-adulter children that you work with on a regular basis, you are the ones that need to
[07:55.560 --> 08:02.280]  take care not to do things that you would carry that back to them. But to lock down a healthy
[08:02.280 --> 08:08.040]  population and tell them it's for the good of everybody, that just ain't going to fly, folks.
[08:09.480 --> 08:16.520]  It is absolutely ridiculous to think that has anything at all to do to prevent the stopping the
[08:17.160 --> 08:23.160]  expansion and contagious nature of this virus. It has nothing to do with that.
[08:26.280 --> 08:30.440]  Putting a healthy person in their home and saying you can't leave is house arrest.
[08:30.440 --> 08:37.000]  That's unconstitutional on its face. Okay? Telling people they cannot open their businesses and they
[08:37.000 --> 08:45.880]  cannot go to work. That's unconstitutional. That is a taking. Okay? It is false imprisonment.
[08:46.600 --> 08:52.040]  It is all the things the Constitution prohibits and they're doing it anyway and you are letting them.
[08:52.760 --> 08:58.360]  And then you are letting the Karens of the world and the Kins of the world dictate how you feel
[08:58.360 --> 09:10.360]  about making your own choices for your own well-being. Why? I just don't understand that. Why?
[09:13.960 --> 09:17.480]  Everybody has to make their own choices about how they're going to live and what they're going to
[09:17.480 --> 09:24.200]  do. But if you're going to spend your days living in fear, that's your choice. Don't try to make it
[09:24.200 --> 09:32.200]  mine. Don't try to make it someone else's. That's your choice. Leave us out of it.
[09:35.160 --> 09:40.520]  Now one thing has changed for me since this all began as far as what I do and where I go except
[09:40.520 --> 09:45.560]  for the fact that the businesses that don't want to do business with me unless I'm wearing a mask
[09:45.560 --> 09:55.960]  no longer get my business. That's the only thing that's changed. Everything else pretty much just
[09:55.960 --> 10:02.840]  the way it's always been. I get up. I do my thing during the day. I go for walks with my dog. We
[10:03.960 --> 10:09.080]  take those long walks and enjoy it. We come back in here and I work. I visit my neighbors
[10:09.080 --> 10:16.600]  and see to them if they're elderly. I help them out with whatever they might need done around
[10:16.600 --> 10:23.320]  their place. But these are healthy people. I'm a healthy person. If you're a healthy person,
[10:23.320 --> 10:27.240]  why are you hiding? Who do you think you're saving by hiding if you're healthy?
[10:28.360 --> 10:33.080]  Who do you think you're saving by wearing a face mask 24-7 if you're healthy?
[10:33.080 --> 10:39.720]  If you are not at risk of catching anything, and by the way folks, just in case you still think
[10:39.720 --> 10:45.240]  that mask means something, not a single one of those masks you're wearing are going to protect
[10:45.240 --> 10:51.640]  you from this virus. Just get that through your head. The only thing the mask would prevent
[10:51.640 --> 10:56.120]  is from you accidentally sneezing, coughing, or spitting on someone when you're talking to them.
[10:56.120 --> 11:05.560]  Okay? Other than that, if the virus is airborne in any way, shape, or form, your mask is not
[11:05.560 --> 11:12.840]  going to do a thing to stop it. Absolutely nothing. Not even your N95 mask. Remember,
[11:12.840 --> 11:21.640]  your N95 mask is a straight exhale from you to the atmosphere. It's only meant to filter out
[11:21.640 --> 11:27.560]  contagions that are coming into the mask from the outside, not what's already inside of it being
[11:27.560 --> 11:35.560]  exhaled back out. It's not filtering anything on the way out. So if you're ill and you're wearing
[11:35.560 --> 11:42.440]  an N95 mask, you're still just as big a threat to the rest of the population as licking their bed pan.
[11:42.440 --> 11:52.280]  But if you know that you're healthy and you're not ill, why are you going
[11:52.280 --> 11:59.240]  along with this BS? If it's not your sheep on mindset, what is it? If you're ashamed because
[11:59.240 --> 12:04.360]  everybody else is shaming you for it, why? Why are you letting them get away with that?
[12:04.360 --> 12:10.280]  Why are you letting them control how you do things? Which leads us right back to the sheep
[12:10.280 --> 12:18.280]  thing, by the way. I just can't understand this, folks. There's a common sense way of
[12:18.280 --> 12:24.840]  dealing with this and then there's the way it's being done and they are nowhere near each other
[12:24.840 --> 12:33.240]  in that regard. Those that have a likelihood of pre-existing conditions that can be exacerbated
[12:33.240 --> 12:38.200]  by this virus should be the ones that are quarantining themselves and taking every precaution
[12:38.200 --> 12:41.800]  not to get infected. The rest of us should be left the hell alone.
[12:45.240 --> 12:51.960]  If you don't see where this is going and why they are pushing it so hard, then heaven help you
[12:51.960 --> 12:57.320]  because you are going to be one of the first people swept under the rug when this finally gets
[12:57.320 --> 13:09.240]  to its apex and they come down on trying to take over everything because that is where this is going.
[13:10.760 --> 13:17.560]  We need to understand that and we need to fight back against it. All right, I got my first caller
[13:17.560 --> 13:25.320]  up on the board. 512-646-1984 is the call-in number if you want to call in. Mr. Pat in Texas,
[13:25.320 --> 13:34.120]  what can we do for you? Oh, no, it's just me. Oh, hi, Ms. Metta. Hi. I have one is a gripe
[13:34.120 --> 13:40.760]  and then Pat's going to tell you what our friend did in Del Rio about the mask. But my gripe is
[13:40.760 --> 13:49.080]  I have written to Governor, Attorney General, Texas Rangers, the Del Rio prosecutor, etc.
[13:49.080 --> 13:57.800]  because our sheriff lost the primary one, so he's not eligible for reelection two. He had his license
[13:57.800 --> 14:06.920]  suspended because of his activities. So where is he now? He is working in New Mexico as a deputy,
[14:06.920 --> 14:14.280]  our sheriff is, but he's getting full pay and benefits and he has one of the county trucks
[14:14.280 --> 14:20.840]  and he threatened the commissioners and county judge with a lawsuit. I don't know what he has
[14:20.840 --> 14:27.960]  over them, but he has something over them if they stop his pay. So here, this is that with my gripe
[14:27.960 --> 14:36.760]  is all these people are written in the accounting office and the nobody, everybody sends me back
[14:36.760 --> 14:41.480]  a letter just kind of washing their hands of it saying, oh, it's not us. We don't take care of this,
[14:41.480 --> 14:50.440]  etc. But to me, it's a waste of government resources by allowing somebody to take a
[14:50.440 --> 14:57.800]  county truck to Mexico to use for personal use and to pay him as a sheriff and he's not even here
[14:57.800 --> 15:06.360]  and his deputies are supposedly under his bond. So... Well, the problem there is is the two
[15:06.360 --> 15:14.760]  offices of public emolument prohibition in the Texas Constitution. The Constitution of Texas
[15:14.760 --> 15:21.560]  does not limit the office of public emolument to only offices in the state of Texas. If he's holding
[15:21.560 --> 15:27.000]  a public office in another state, that's still another source of public emolument that violates
[15:27.000 --> 15:35.480]  that constitutional standard. Not only that, it is embezzlement. It's flat out embezzlement and theft
[15:35.480 --> 15:41.880]  of government property. Thank you. And that's our key cues for you. And this is Carol County.
[15:42.440 --> 15:50.360]  Now, I'm going to have Pat talk to you about what some friends of ours did to get around the mass
[15:50.360 --> 16:03.160]  issue. Hi, Eddie. Howdy. You know, we have a real dense population out here. Yes. So...
[16:03.160 --> 16:07.720]  Let's see. What is it? One person for every five square miles or something?
[16:09.160 --> 16:16.600]  No, five or six. We might be ten, I'm not sure. We got eight and a half million acres and we got
[16:16.600 --> 16:23.800]  less than a thousand people. So there's a lot of people out here. More than we need. Anyway,
[16:25.080 --> 16:32.360]  my nearest neighbor, they live about five miles away from us. They've been following what's going
[16:32.360 --> 16:41.080]  on and they wanted a hard copy of the governor's latest and greatest executive order. And for
[16:41.080 --> 16:47.400]  everybody, if they don't know, the music's playing, but I'll say it anyway real quick,
[16:47.400 --> 16:55.560]  the executive orders are not law. Right. But that's for the Texas Supreme Court and the Attorney
[16:55.560 --> 17:03.480]  General's office. Yeah. Okay, Pat. Hang on. Just a second. We'll be right back. All right, folks.
[17:25.720 --> 17:31.240]  to be announced. Every $25 donation is a chance to win. When you purchase Randy
[17:31.240 --> 17:36.520]  Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's
[17:36.520 --> 17:42.280]  traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win. If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network,
[17:42.280 --> 17:47.720]  support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio
[17:47.720 --> 17:53.960]  today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. And remember, every $25 donation
[17:53.960 --> 18:01.320]  is a chance to win. Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today. Are you being
[18:01.320 --> 18:06.840]  harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors
[18:06.840 --> 18:12.440]  now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against
[18:12.440 --> 18:17.720]  debt collectors and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English
[18:17.720 --> 18:23.400]  on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do when contacted by phones,
[18:23.400 --> 18:28.520]  mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your
[18:28.520 --> 18:34.280]  credit reports? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The
[18:34.280 --> 18:40.120]  Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation
[18:40.120 --> 18:45.720]  is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue
[18:45.720 --> 18:56.440]  Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[18:56.440 --> 19:16.680]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:26.440 --> 19:38.200]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports? How to turn the financial tables on
[19:38.200 --> 19:51.480]  them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for
[19:51.480 --> 20:06.360]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports? How to get debt collectors out of your
[20:06.360 --> 20:25.880]  credit reports? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The
[20:25.880 --> 20:31.480]  at number 5126461984, and we are talking with Pat in Texas.
[20:31.480 --> 20:33.960]  All right, Pat, please continue.
[20:33.960 --> 20:38.160]  Well, what I did is I gave our neighbors
[20:38.160 --> 20:44.000]  copies of the governor's EO-29, and that's
[20:44.000 --> 20:47.320]  his latest and greatest mandatory mask thing,
[20:47.320 --> 20:50.320]  with a page and a half of the exemptions.
[20:50.320 --> 21:01.360]  And then I also gave them the ADA sheet about violation
[21:01.360 --> 21:05.200]  of medical stuff.
[21:05.200 --> 21:07.600]  That's from Chris Ann Hall.
[21:07.600 --> 21:13.600]  And then the other little card about OSHA and all that.
[21:13.600 --> 21:16.760]  But also a copy of the Texas Supreme Court ruling
[21:16.760 --> 21:20.840]  has said that what the governor and everybody's doing
[21:20.840 --> 21:28.000]  and all the mayors and county judges are doing
[21:28.000 --> 21:30.800]  is basically unconstitutional.
[21:30.800 --> 21:32.840]  Yeah, it's not even in the law that they're
[21:32.840 --> 21:34.240]  trying to say they're using.
[21:34.240 --> 21:36.000]  It's not written in the law to let them do
[21:36.000 --> 21:37.960]  any of the things they're doing.
[21:37.960 --> 21:41.240]  They are only allowed to perform these actions they're doing
[21:41.240 --> 21:44.640]  in an actual quarantine zone.
[21:44.640 --> 21:48.120]  And it has to be a declared quarantine zone.
[21:48.120 --> 21:52.320]  The entire state of Texas is not a quarantine zone.
[21:52.320 --> 21:53.800]  And here's their other problem.
[21:53.800 --> 21:55.720]  For intelligence.
[21:55.720 --> 21:58.280]  I think it's quarantine for intelligence.
[21:58.280 --> 22:00.200]  Yeah.
[22:00.200 --> 22:03.720]  But anyway, what happened was my neighbors
[22:03.720 --> 22:05.400]  had to go to Del Rio.
[22:05.400 --> 22:09.720]  Del Rio has declared, Valverde County has declared,
[22:09.720 --> 22:14.520]  that everybody must wear a mask or you will be arrested.
[22:14.520 --> 22:18.040]  It's a 100% mask mandatory thing no matter where you're at
[22:18.040 --> 22:20.920]  and how you're doing it, whatever.
[22:20.920 --> 22:25.200]  They went over to Walmart to get my neighbor's wife,
[22:25.200 --> 22:26.400]  her medicine.
[22:26.400 --> 22:27.680]  She has asthma.
[22:27.680 --> 22:30.440]  Well, basically, both of them have asthma.
[22:30.440 --> 22:37.280]  And she's not wearing a mask because she has already
[22:37.280 --> 22:39.000]  passed out once wearing a mask and she
[22:39.000 --> 22:40.040]  isn't going to do it anymore.
[22:40.040 --> 22:45.280]  She's already, plus it was only about 109 degrees.
[22:45.280 --> 22:48.240]  And they were standing in line trying to get in to Walmart.
[22:48.240 --> 22:51.040]  And the store manager was out there.
[22:51.040 --> 22:53.480]  And he tried telling her she had to wear a mask.
[22:53.480 --> 22:58.560]  She showed him hard copy right on the EO itself
[22:58.560 --> 23:00.440]  that there are certain exemptions.
[23:00.440 --> 23:04.680]  And being somebody who has a respiratory disease
[23:04.680 --> 23:07.640]  or a condition that precludes it is right there
[23:07.640 --> 23:15.200]  on the top of all the lifts, and making a long story short,
[23:15.200 --> 23:19.440]  he finally acquiesced, made copies of everything,
[23:19.440 --> 23:21.520]  and let them go on in.
[23:21.520 --> 23:23.440]  Same thing happened over at AGB.
[23:23.440 --> 23:26.840]  Same thing happened at Home Depot.
[23:26.840 --> 23:29.320]  But they're all standing outside,
[23:29.320 --> 23:32.920]  bright sun, 108, 109 degrees.
[23:32.920 --> 23:36.080]  And they're expecting people to stand there and just take this.
[23:36.080 --> 23:37.480]  And most of them are.
[23:37.480 --> 23:43.200]  They're just sucking this up like a bunch of little sheep.
[23:43.200 --> 23:46.160]  Yeah, they've had their picture full of Kool-Aid,
[23:46.160 --> 23:48.080]  not just a cup.
[23:48.080 --> 23:51.840]  And so the next day, they have to go to San Angelo
[23:51.840 --> 23:53.840]  for something totally different.
[23:53.840 --> 23:57.800]  They get to San Angelo and nobody's wearing masks.
[23:57.800 --> 23:58.720]  I mean, nobody.
[23:58.720 --> 24:01.080]  They go into the store as AGB.
[24:01.080 --> 24:03.880]  AGB has supposedly a statewide policy.
[24:03.880 --> 24:05.640]  You have to wear a mask.
[24:05.640 --> 24:08.200]  Not in San Angelo.
[24:08.200 --> 24:10.760]  They had to go to San AGB there.
[24:10.760 --> 24:12.080]  They had to go to Walmart.
[24:12.080 --> 24:13.800]  They went to Sam's.
[24:13.800 --> 24:16.120]  Nothing, no masks.
[24:16.120 --> 24:19.800]  You could see individuals walking around with masks on.
[24:19.800 --> 24:21.720]  But nobody's standing in line wearing a mask,
[24:21.720 --> 24:24.560]  and nobody's making a big deal out of anything.
[24:24.560 --> 24:27.800]  So two different counties, two different towns,
[24:27.800 --> 24:29.880]  two different situations.
[24:29.880 --> 24:33.240]  But she wasn't backing down on Wednesday.
[24:33.240 --> 24:37.320]  She just basically told the store managers,
[24:37.320 --> 24:41.120]  this is how it's going to go, and I'm not putting on a mask.
[24:41.120 --> 24:46.000]  And after that, you could see onesies and twosies taking
[24:46.000 --> 24:46.880]  their masks off.
[24:46.880 --> 24:54.880]  She said, but most of the people are just acquiescing.
[24:54.880 --> 25:00.560]  But the state Supreme Court has already ruled, no.
[25:00.560 --> 25:03.120]  The bill of rights cannot be set aside.
[25:03.120 --> 25:07.160]  As Article 1, right there in the Texas Constitution,
[25:07.160 --> 25:09.920]  first 30 sections of it.
[25:09.920 --> 25:18.000]  Also, Paxton's office put out a letter back May 12
[25:18.000 --> 25:21.600]  to all the county judges and city mayors
[25:21.600 --> 25:26.000]  of all the major cities that they're
[25:26.000 --> 25:29.800]  opening themselves up and their offices
[25:29.800 --> 25:34.680]  to liability lawsuits because they're violating people's
[25:34.680 --> 25:35.960]  rights.
[25:35.960 --> 25:40.080]  They have no authority to do anything that they're doing.
[25:40.080 --> 25:46.960]  The governor has extended repeatedly now for six, five
[25:46.960 --> 25:52.400]  times, I think it is now, this 30-day emergency
[25:52.400 --> 25:54.760]  proclamation.
[25:54.760 --> 25:57.600]  Read the law, it ain't there.
[25:57.600 --> 25:59.880]  And I don't know what's the matter with the lieutenant
[25:59.880 --> 26:02.680]  governor, but he should have already called,
[26:02.680 --> 26:05.600]  and either him or Abbot, one of the two,
[26:05.600 --> 26:08.520]  needed to call an emergency session of the state legislature
[26:08.520 --> 26:11.520]  because they're the only ones that can set law aside.
[26:11.520 --> 26:15.040]  And no, they cannot set the Constitution aside.
[26:15.040 --> 26:18.160]  But they are supposed to have been called in so that they
[26:18.160 --> 26:23.280]  can do an emergency session and do what is required.
[26:23.280 --> 26:29.120]  This is a fly-off across everybody.
[26:29.120 --> 26:30.880]  And if people don't believe that,
[26:30.880 --> 26:34.360]  they need to sit back and take a look at it.
[26:34.360 --> 26:36.560]  Yeah, the thing about these executive orders
[26:36.560 --> 26:38.120]  that too many people don't understand
[26:38.120 --> 26:40.640]  is they are binding law upon members
[26:40.640 --> 26:44.320]  of the executive department of government, state employees,
[26:44.320 --> 26:46.600]  and state employees only.
[26:46.600 --> 26:49.440]  If there's a mass mandate, they are the ones
[26:49.440 --> 26:51.840]  that have to comply.
[26:51.840 --> 26:55.160]  It is not Joe Public.
[26:55.160 --> 26:57.560]  No, and there's an OSHA requirement.
[26:57.560 --> 27:00.880]  The second that they make a proclamation like that,
[27:00.880 --> 27:05.480]  OSHA falls in because they're working.
[27:05.480 --> 27:08.720]  The rest of us, they cannot mandate anything.
[27:08.720 --> 27:12.280]  They are our employees.
[27:12.280 --> 27:14.240]  And that's something that the governor apparently
[27:14.240 --> 27:16.760]  has forgotten.
[27:16.760 --> 27:22.840]  Maybe he ought to go back to the CIA where he came from.
[27:22.840 --> 27:25.640]  Well, I'm for sweeping the CIA off the map.
[27:25.640 --> 27:28.520]  They shouldn't be there in the first place.
[27:28.520 --> 27:31.720]  Yeah, well, you and me, we'll hold a private discussion
[27:31.720 --> 27:35.800]  about that one, about my feelings about the company.
[27:35.800 --> 27:39.360]  But that's beside the point at this point.
[27:39.360 --> 27:43.400]  But yeah, and my wife and I don't wear masks clear.
[27:43.400 --> 27:46.000]  We don't even own one.
[27:46.000 --> 27:47.840]  Somebody got a problem with it.
[27:47.840 --> 27:53.520]  They can take it up with the people I get my rights from.
[27:53.520 --> 27:54.240]  OK?
[27:54.240 --> 27:57.040]  Yeah.
[27:57.040 --> 27:59.600]  Anyway, Eddie, it's good to hear your voice.
[27:59.600 --> 28:01.760]  I'm glad you're alive tonight.
[28:01.760 --> 28:03.520]  Well, I appreciate that, and y'all too, Pat.
[28:03.520 --> 28:06.440]  Always glad to hear from you.
[28:06.440 --> 28:08.160]  And I want to thank you and Ms. Medec again
[28:08.160 --> 28:09.120]  for all your support.
[28:09.120 --> 28:12.440]  Without you, I would not have made it this far.
[28:12.440 --> 28:14.160]  There's absolutely no mistaking that.
[28:14.160 --> 28:16.800]  I would not.
[28:16.800 --> 28:17.440]  You're good.
[28:17.440 --> 28:18.800]  You just keep it up.
[28:18.800 --> 28:19.880]  Don't stop.
[28:19.880 --> 28:22.240]  I appreciate it, sir.
[28:22.240 --> 28:23.040]  All right.
[28:23.040 --> 28:25.600]  All right, I have a great night, and thanks for calling.
[28:25.600 --> 28:26.200]  You too.
[28:26.200 --> 28:26.600]  Bye.
[28:26.600 --> 28:28.280]  Bye-bye.
[28:28.280 --> 28:32.560]  All right, folks, 512-646-1984 is calling number.
[28:32.560 --> 28:35.200]  If you want to call in and talk about something.
[28:35.200 --> 28:37.400]  In the meantime, I got a minute and a half
[28:37.400 --> 28:39.640]  before I have to take another break here.
[28:39.640 --> 28:45.240]  But folks, I know some of you have nothing more important
[28:45.240 --> 28:48.840]  in your life than to just be scared of everything.
[28:48.840 --> 28:51.800]  And I know some of you wouldn't be scared of anything
[28:51.800 --> 28:54.160]  no matter what it is.
[28:54.160 --> 28:59.680]  The problem is, is what are you going to do
[28:59.680 --> 29:02.280]  to fix the problem, either way?
[29:02.280 --> 29:04.920]  There are times when fear is justified.
[29:04.920 --> 29:09.000]  Doesn't mean it should control you, but it's justifiable.
[29:09.000 --> 29:13.000]  I mean, courage is not a lack of fear.
[29:13.000 --> 29:17.440]  It's the mastering of fear, OK?
[29:17.440 --> 29:22.960]  So what do you have the courage to do when you know or should
[29:22.960 --> 29:26.160]  know and have the ability to find out whether or not
[29:26.160 --> 29:30.800]  you're being lied to by those that are requiring you
[29:30.800 --> 29:33.960]  to trust in their wisdom when they have none?
[29:33.960 --> 29:37.560]  And they've demonstrated that they have none time and time
[29:37.560 --> 29:40.000]  again.
[29:40.000 --> 29:42.800]  Nobody in their right mind would trust a fool
[29:42.800 --> 29:44.920]  to dictate their life to them.
[29:44.920 --> 29:47.800]  And yet, when it comes to government, the biggest fool
[29:47.800 --> 29:51.240]  of all, you're jumping right on the bandwagon.
[29:51.240 --> 29:53.440]  All right, folks, we'll be right back after this break.
[29:53.440 --> 29:54.440]  So y'all hang on.
[29:54.440 --> 29:57.840]  512-646-1984.
[30:01.840 --> 30:04.800]  Thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI
[30:04.800 --> 30:07.800]  may very well have been driving under the blood alcohol
[30:07.800 --> 30:08.800]  limit.
[30:08.800 --> 30:10.320]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, and I'll
[30:10.320 --> 30:12.760]  be back with a tale of bad breathalysers
[30:12.760 --> 30:15.440]  and a government cover-up in a moment.
[30:15.440 --> 30:17.400]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.400 --> 30:19.280]  When you give up data about yourself,
[30:19.280 --> 30:21.000]  you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.000 --> 30:23.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll
[30:23.000 --> 30:25.800]  find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:25.800 --> 30:27.200]  So protect your rights.
[30:27.200 --> 30:31.040]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.040 --> 30:33.560]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:33.560 --> 30:35.480]  This public service announcement is brought to you
[30:35.480 --> 30:38.400]  by StartPage.com, the private search engine
[30:38.400 --> 30:41.120]  alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.120 --> 30:44.760]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.760 --> 30:46.920]  Ever hear the term fine farming?
[30:46.920 --> 30:50.040]  It's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue,
[30:50.040 --> 30:52.480]  and it's apparently big business in the Sunshine
[30:52.480 --> 30:53.800]  State of Florida.
[30:53.800 --> 30:56.000]  This case involves breathalysers used
[30:56.000 --> 30:59.720]  to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI violations.
[30:59.720 --> 31:02.480]  Recently, reporters discovered that the devices were
[31:02.480 --> 31:04.240]  improperly calibrated.
[31:04.240 --> 31:06.920]  State officials knew about it for two and a half years,
[31:06.920 --> 31:08.080]  but did nothing.
[31:08.080 --> 31:10.960]  In fact, the head of Florida's breath testing program
[31:10.960 --> 31:14.120]  ordered inspectors not to document the problem.
[31:14.120 --> 31:16.880]  A DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life,
[31:16.880 --> 31:18.920]  but now that the cover-up has been exposed,
[31:18.920 --> 31:22.440]  perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier.
[31:22.440 --> 31:23.600]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:23.600 --> 31:26.520]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:26.520 --> 31:30.600]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell
[31:30.600 --> 31:32.200]  on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:32.200 --> 31:34.160]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:34.160 --> 31:37.400]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded
[31:37.400 --> 31:39.000]  it was a controlled demolition.
[31:39.000 --> 31:41.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members
[31:41.000 --> 31:42.000]  have given their lives.
[31:42.000 --> 31:44.600]  1,000 of my fellow force responders have died.
[31:44.600 --> 31:46.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:46.000 --> 31:47.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:47.000 --> 31:48.520]  I'm a New York City correctionalist.
[31:48.520 --> 31:49.520]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:49.520 --> 31:51.080]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:51.080 --> 31:53.520]  We are Americans, and we are Americans.
[31:53.520 --> 31:55.520]  We are Americans.
[31:55.520 --> 31:57.520]  And we deserve the truth.
[31:57.520 --> 32:00.520]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:00.520 --> 32:04.520]  Rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic
[32:04.520 --> 32:05.520]  similar.
[32:05.520 --> 32:07.520]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:07.520 --> 32:09.520]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:09.520 --> 32:12.520]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.520 --> 32:14.520]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place
[32:14.520 --> 32:16.520]  to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:16.520 --> 32:19.520]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.520 --> 32:21.520]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:21.520 --> 32:24.520]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due
[32:24.520 --> 32:25.520]  process.
[32:25.520 --> 32:27.520]  Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with
[32:27.520 --> 32:29.520]  Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive
[32:29.520 --> 32:31.520]  teaching tool available that will help you understand what
[32:31.520 --> 32:34.520]  due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:34.520 --> 32:37.520]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going
[32:37.520 --> 32:40.520]  to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.520 --> 32:42.520]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:42.520 --> 32:44.520]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:44.520 --> 32:47.520]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:47.520 --> 32:49.520]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource
[32:49.520 --> 32:50.520]  material.
[32:50.520 --> 32:52.520]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this
[32:52.520 --> 32:54.520]  material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.520 --> 32:56.520]  Order your copy today and together we can have
[32:56.520 --> 32:58.520]  the free society we all want and deserve.
[32:58.520 --> 33:19.520]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:28.520 --> 33:55.520]  Live Free Speech Radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:55.520 --> 33:58.520]  Alright folks, we are back.
[33:58.520 --> 34:05.520]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[34:05.520 --> 34:08.520]  Alright, now while we're waiting on callers,
[34:08.520 --> 34:13.520]  I want to talk a little bit about the updated seminar material.
[34:13.520 --> 34:15.520]  I am still working on it.
[34:15.520 --> 34:21.520]  I had a lot of information collected for the second book
[34:21.520 --> 34:26.520]  and had put a lot of it together, piecemeal,
[34:26.520 --> 34:29.520]  but not exactly in the way I wanted it then.
[34:29.520 --> 34:32.520]  We started having these third court of appeals
[34:32.520 --> 34:38.520]  and county court of law opinions on the transportation,
[34:38.520 --> 34:41.520]  not engaging transportation argument relating
[34:41.520 --> 34:44.520]  to the transportation code.
[34:44.520 --> 34:47.520]  So that may be backtrack and here's how I'm going
[34:47.520 --> 34:50.520]  to be doing the second book now.
[34:50.520 --> 34:53.520]  Turns out that this may actually be the best way to do it
[34:53.520 --> 34:56.520]  because this is what's going to give you the most insight
[34:56.520 --> 35:02.520]  into the legal aspects of what the other side is doing
[35:02.520 --> 35:08.520]  and how they're using what they do to get away with committing fraud.
[35:08.520 --> 35:11.520]  And that's exactly what they're doing.
[35:11.520 --> 35:15.520]  The courts are knowingly and willfully committing fraud
[35:15.520 --> 35:19.520]  in the way they are ruling in relation to the transportation code
[35:19.520 --> 35:21.520]  and its related offenses.
[35:21.520 --> 35:24.520]  And they're doing it for the money.
[35:24.520 --> 35:28.520]  They're doing it so that they can make your rights
[35:28.520 --> 35:34.520]  subject to their statutes.
[35:34.520 --> 35:37.520]  That will not fly in my book.
[35:37.520 --> 35:42.520]  So in my book, I'm going to go through line by line
[35:42.520 --> 35:45.520]  each and every one of the opinions they had.
[35:45.520 --> 35:48.520]  And what I'm going to do is I'm going to take the areas
[35:48.520 --> 35:51.520]  of the opinions where they are talking about the same thing
[35:51.520 --> 35:53.520]  in each separate opinion.
[35:53.520 --> 35:56.520]  I'm going to take that particular portion of that opinion.
[35:56.520 --> 35:59.520]  I'm going to group them together in parts of the book.
[35:59.520 --> 36:02.520]  And then I'm going to go through the specific law
[36:02.520 --> 36:06.520]  that proves that part of the opinion is completely false.
[36:06.520 --> 36:11.520]  Not only is it false, it's a knowing and willful fraud
[36:11.520 --> 36:15.520]  perpetrated by the court because they ignored the rules
[36:15.520 --> 36:18.520]  of criminal procedure. They ignored the rules
[36:18.520 --> 36:21.520]  of statutory construction and the writing of laws.
[36:21.520 --> 36:27.520]  They ignored the rules of interpretation time and time again
[36:27.520 --> 36:34.520]  to get an outcome they wanted instead of the one the law required.
[36:34.520 --> 36:37.520]  That's judicial fraud.
[36:37.520 --> 36:40.520]  That's a violation of the judicial ethics.
[36:40.520 --> 36:45.520]  That's a violation of every rule in the judicial canons
[36:45.520 --> 36:47.520]  about fair and impartial.
[36:47.520 --> 36:51.520]  When the court is willing to ignore the law
[36:51.520 --> 36:55.520]  to reach an opinion decision that they want to have,
[36:55.520 --> 36:59.520]  regardless of what the law itself requires them to do,
[36:59.520 --> 37:02.520]  your judiciary is corrupt.
[37:02.520 --> 37:09.520]  And here in Texas, that is the most factual way of naming them.
[37:09.520 --> 37:13.520]  They are absolutely, totally corrupt.
[37:13.520 --> 37:18.520]  The third court of appeals, they're morons.
[37:18.520 --> 37:23.520]  There is no other way to conclude their capabilities.
[37:23.520 --> 37:26.520]  They are morons.
[37:26.520 --> 37:29.520]  And all you have to do is read the opinion and compare it
[37:29.520 --> 37:33.520]  to the law and to the rules of statutory construction
[37:33.520 --> 37:35.520]  and the requirement on how laws are to be written
[37:35.520 --> 37:38.520]  and interpreted and you can see that for yourself
[37:38.520 --> 37:41.520]  or at least if you want to see it, you can see it.
[37:41.520 --> 37:45.520]  Now, if you're one of those many people who are my detractors
[37:45.520 --> 37:47.520]  saying I don't know what I'm talking about,
[37:47.520 --> 37:51.520]  here's a little test for you folks that want to do that.
[37:51.520 --> 37:54.520]  You take what I say about the law
[37:54.520 --> 37:58.520]  and the court opinions they're writing in relation to that law,
[37:58.520 --> 38:03.520]  then you show me where the law itself disagrees with me.
[38:03.520 --> 38:06.520]  Not their opinion because the whole point of my argument is
[38:06.520 --> 38:09.520]  their opinion is corrupt.
[38:09.520 --> 38:13.520]  So you are not going to refute my dissection
[38:13.520 --> 38:18.520]  of what they're doing by using more of their opinions.
[38:18.520 --> 38:21.520]  It just isn't going to work that way.
[38:21.520 --> 38:24.520]  If they're willing to give you ten corrupt opinions
[38:24.520 --> 38:27.520]  in this instance, why should I trust that the one you're trying
[38:27.520 --> 38:30.520]  to use to argue with me is not as just as corrupt?
[38:30.520 --> 38:34.520]  And in fact, it is just as corrupt because if I'm right,
[38:34.520 --> 38:37.520]  then that opinion you're using is based upon
[38:37.520 --> 38:42.520]  an entirely false premise of law.
[38:42.520 --> 38:44.520]  Therefore, it is corrupt.
[38:44.520 --> 38:46.520]  It is unreliable.
[38:46.520 --> 38:49.520]  It cannot be trusted to be correct.
[38:49.520 --> 38:57.520]  So, if you can't beat my argument using the actual statutory law,
[38:57.520 --> 39:00.520]  then shut the hell up.
[39:00.520 --> 39:03.520]  You don't know what you're talking about.
[39:03.520 --> 39:08.520]  You will never know what you are talking about
[39:08.520 --> 39:14.520]  because you have not spent the time in the actual law that I have.
[39:14.520 --> 39:17.520]  You have not studied it backwards and forwards.
[39:17.520 --> 39:20.520]  Every part of it mapped it out, linked it together,
[39:20.520 --> 39:23.520]  understood what it means through history,
[39:23.520 --> 39:26.520]  as well as currently in all the statutory revisions
[39:26.520 --> 39:28.520]  they've made for it.
[39:28.520 --> 39:30.520]  You don't know.
[39:30.520 --> 39:34.520]  You're just basing your opinion upon fabricated,
[39:34.520 --> 39:38.520]  falsified opinions of morons.
[39:38.520 --> 39:40.520]  That's simple.
[39:40.520 --> 39:43.520]  If you think I will ever back down from that stance,
[39:43.520 --> 39:54.520]  absent that level of proof, you are sadly mistaken.
[39:54.520 --> 39:58.520]  I did not start doing this because I believed
[39:58.520 --> 40:03.520]  I might understand it or I had some small idea of understanding it.
[40:03.520 --> 40:09.520]  I worked my butt off to understand it.
[40:09.520 --> 40:12.520]  I can quote most of it to you directly from memory.
[40:12.520 --> 40:16.520]  I can tell you what statutes you have to read in relation to each other
[40:16.520 --> 40:23.520]  in order to see the entire picture from memory.
[40:23.520 --> 40:27.520]  If you can't do that, you have no business standing there telling me
[40:27.520 --> 40:29.520]  I don't know what I'm talking about.
[40:29.520 --> 40:34.520]  Absolutely none.
[40:34.520 --> 40:38.520]  When people call into this show at night and ask me questions,
[40:38.520 --> 40:42.520]  I'm not sitting here with source material for those questions in front of me.
[40:42.520 --> 40:44.520]  Those questions were not solicited.
[40:44.520 --> 40:48.520]  Those problems those people are bringing on this show are their own.
[40:48.520 --> 40:52.520]  And I don't know absolutely nothing about them in the beginning
[40:52.520 --> 40:54.520]  if it's the first time they've called.
[40:54.520 --> 41:00.520]  And yet, everything I tell them, I am telling them directly from memory.
[41:00.520 --> 41:04.520]  And then when I want to be more specific about something,
[41:04.520 --> 41:07.520]  I will use my memory to look up that specific statute
[41:07.520 --> 41:10.520]  so I can read it to them verbatim to tell them,
[41:10.520 --> 41:12.520]  here's what it says.
[41:12.520 --> 41:15.520]  And here are the other things you've got to look at in conjunction with this
[41:15.520 --> 41:20.520]  to get the entire picture.
[41:20.520 --> 41:23.520]  When you can do that, we can have a discussion.
[41:23.520 --> 41:29.520]  But until you can, your opinion doesn't mean Joe blows squat to me.
[41:29.520 --> 41:31.520]  And it never will.
[41:31.520 --> 41:36.520]  So you just keep nice saying about what I know and what I say all you want to.
[41:36.520 --> 41:38.520]  Doesn't bother me one bit.
[41:38.520 --> 41:41.520]  It's your ignorance and stupidity that's going to be your downfall.
[41:41.520 --> 41:46.520]  It isn't going to affect me in the least.
[41:46.520 --> 41:49.520]  So keep that in mind.
[41:49.520 --> 41:52.520]  All right, we have another caller up on the board right now.
[41:52.520 --> 41:56.520]  512-646-1984 is the call-in number.
[41:56.520 --> 41:58.520]  I have Jay in Oregon.
[41:58.520 --> 42:01.520]  Jay, I've got two minutes before the break so I can give you one.
[42:01.520 --> 42:06.520]  And then we'll have to put you on hold and pick you up after, okay?
[42:06.520 --> 42:09.520]  Yes, sir. Hello, Eddie.
[42:09.520 --> 42:11.520]  Two traders from Oregon.
[42:11.520 --> 42:13.520]  Why are you showing up on the board as Jay?
[42:13.520 --> 42:17.520]  Who did you tell your name was Jay?
[42:17.520 --> 42:19.520]  Nobody consciously.
[42:19.520 --> 42:24.520]  I don't know why that is, but it is what it is.
[42:24.520 --> 42:26.520]  All right.
[42:26.520 --> 42:32.520]  I have something to read to you, but I will wait till after the break in which to do so.
[42:32.520 --> 42:35.520]  What does it deal with, Raider?
[42:35.520 --> 42:43.520]  It's about what the law here is in Oregon and what it's supposed to be.
[42:43.520 --> 42:50.520]  Well, what do you mean what it is and what it is supposed to be? Those are supposed to be the same thing.
[42:50.520 --> 42:52.520]  Yeah, absolutely.
[42:52.520 --> 42:57.520]  Okay, so what are you going to read me?
[42:57.520 --> 42:59.520]  It's something I wrote up.
[42:59.520 --> 43:01.520]  Something you wrote up?
[43:01.520 --> 43:08.520]  Yes, I wrote it up, but I wanted you to hear it and to hear what it is and what you...
[43:08.520 --> 43:18.520]  If you're wanting me to talk about laws that I haven't read, I would much rather that you email that to me first and let me read it and then we can discuss it.
[43:18.520 --> 43:31.520]  But for you to read it to me on the air and for me to have to answer what it may or may not mean isn't going to do me any good because I can't research it before I have to talk about it.
[43:31.520 --> 43:33.520]  Okay.
[43:33.520 --> 43:36.520]  Well, give me the title of what it is.
[43:36.520 --> 43:39.520]  You wrote the title too, right?
[43:39.520 --> 43:40.520]  Yes.
[43:40.520 --> 43:46.520]  Okay, so the title still doesn't tell me anything about the law.
[43:46.520 --> 43:52.520]  When I read it to you, you'll probably think it's alright if I can tell you what it is.
[43:52.520 --> 43:56.520]  Well, hang on just a second. Let me get past this break and we'll do that.
[43:56.520 --> 44:07.520]  Alright folks, call in number 512-646.
[44:26.520 --> 44:27.520]  You can too.
[44:57.520 --> 45:05.520]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[45:05.520 --> 45:09.520]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick.
[45:09.520 --> 45:14.520]  I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[45:14.520 --> 45:21.520]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[45:21.520 --> 45:23.520]  How can I help logos?
[45:23.520 --> 45:30.520]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[45:30.520 --> 45:32.520]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[45:32.520 --> 45:35.520]  Now, go to LogosRegular Network.com.
[45:35.520 --> 45:38.520]  Check on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[45:38.520 --> 45:44.520]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[45:44.520 --> 45:45.520]  Do I pay extra?
[45:45.520 --> 45:46.520]  No.
[45:46.520 --> 45:48.520]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[45:48.520 --> 45:49.520]  No.
[45:49.520 --> 45:50.520]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[45:50.520 --> 45:51.520]  No.
[45:51.520 --> 45:52.520]  I mean, yes.
[45:52.520 --> 45:56.520]  Well, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is just perfect.
[45:56.520 --> 45:57.520]  Thank you so much.
[45:57.520 --> 45:59.520]  We are welcome.
[45:59.520 --> 46:28.520]  Happy Holidays, Logos!
[46:30.520 --> 46:33.520]  Running into the night
[46:33.520 --> 46:35.520]  There's too many men
[46:35.520 --> 46:37.520]  Too many people
[46:37.520 --> 46:40.520]  We think too many problems
[46:40.520 --> 46:44.520]  And I'm about to have to go round
[46:44.520 --> 46:48.520]  Can't see it until the end of the future
[46:51.520 --> 46:55.520]  This is the world of music again
[46:55.520 --> 47:00.520]  And these are the hands we give to
[47:00.520 --> 47:02.520]  You didn't let us down
[47:02.520 --> 47:04.520]  Alright, folks, we are back.
[47:04.520 --> 47:11.520]  This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[47:11.520 --> 47:12.520]  Come on, folks.
[47:12.520 --> 47:13.520]  I need some callers up on this board.
[47:13.520 --> 47:15.520]  I don't have nearly enough for tonight.
[47:15.520 --> 47:19.520]  Alright, what is the title, Rader?
[47:19.520 --> 47:21.520]  Thank you, Eddie.
[47:21.520 --> 47:33.520]  What it is, is the truth about the facts in law here in the state of Oregon concerning the right of liberty through locomotion.
[47:33.520 --> 47:34.520]  Okay.
[47:34.520 --> 47:37.520]  How does that tell me what the law is?
[47:37.520 --> 47:40.520]  You still haven't answered that question.
[47:40.520 --> 47:46.520]  What I did with this is I dissected a particular statute in the Oregon Revised Statute.
[47:46.520 --> 47:48.520]  Just one?
[47:48.520 --> 47:55.520]  Yes, just one to start with, with the concerning the vehicle code.
[47:55.520 --> 48:03.520]  And what is the subject or the interior object of that statute?
[48:03.520 --> 48:08.520]  The capacity of a law enforcement official concerning the public.
[48:08.520 --> 48:11.520]  And what their capacity and what they can do and what they...
[48:11.520 --> 48:14.520]  Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[48:14.520 --> 48:16.520]  Say that again.
[48:16.520 --> 48:20.520]  Is that what the title of that statute is?
[48:20.520 --> 48:21.520]  No.
[48:21.520 --> 48:24.520]  What's the title of that statute?
[48:24.520 --> 48:39.520]  The title of the statute is, in the vehicle code, Section 810.410, paragraph 3, Item A.
[48:39.520 --> 48:42.520]  Oregon Vehicle Code.
[48:42.520 --> 48:43.520]  Yes.
[48:43.520 --> 48:48.520]  Is it 810?
[48:48.520 --> 48:50.520]  Correct, 810.
[48:50.520 --> 48:51.520]  Uh-huh.
[48:51.520 --> 49:00.520]  In the chapter, the vehicle code, Chapter 800, 810.410.
[49:00.520 --> 49:02.520]  810.410?
[49:02.520 --> 49:06.520]  Yes.
[49:06.520 --> 49:09.520]  A rest and citation.
[49:09.520 --> 49:19.520]  3 and then paragraph A.
[49:19.520 --> 49:24.520]  Yeah, except there's paragraph B.
[49:24.520 --> 49:26.520]  Yes, it follows up.
[49:26.520 --> 49:33.520]  I'm looking specifically under the title, Police Officer.
[49:33.520 --> 49:35.520]  And?
[49:35.520 --> 49:46.520]  Police Officer is not to arrest a person for a traffic violation.
[49:46.520 --> 49:49.520]  They shall not arrest a person for a traffic violation.
[49:49.520 --> 49:54.520]  And what is the definition of person assigned to this section?
[49:54.520 --> 49:56.520]  Okay, person.
[49:56.520 --> 50:01.520]  Where are you getting the definition of person?
[50:01.520 --> 50:06.520]  I'm getting it from seminar material, which is discussing.
[50:06.520 --> 50:07.520]  Whoa, whoa.
[50:07.520 --> 50:10.520]  What seminar material?
[50:10.520 --> 50:12.520]  Part of your seminar material.
[50:12.520 --> 50:17.520]  Is my seminar material quoting Oregon law?
[50:17.520 --> 50:18.520]  No.
[50:18.520 --> 50:23.520]  Then why are you using my seminar material as a source for the definition of person?
[50:23.520 --> 50:26.520]  Because that's what the definition of a person is.
[50:26.520 --> 50:27.520]  One is in there.
[50:27.520 --> 50:28.520]  No, no.
[50:28.520 --> 50:30.520]  That is not the way that works, Raider.
[50:30.520 --> 50:33.520]  And you know better than that.
[50:33.520 --> 50:39.520]  What is the hierarchy on understanding the definition of terms in law?
[50:39.520 --> 50:42.520]  How many times have I explained that hierarchy on this show?
[50:42.520 --> 50:47.520]  What is the hierarchy?
[50:47.520 --> 50:51.520]  The hierarchy would be, you know, and would...
[50:51.520 --> 50:59.520]  Where's the first place you look for a legal definition of a term or phrase in law?
[50:59.520 --> 51:00.520]  In a legal dictionary.
[51:00.520 --> 51:01.520]  No, it's not.
[51:01.520 --> 51:08.520]  It's the law itself.
[51:08.520 --> 51:09.520]  No, right?
[51:09.520 --> 51:12.520]  So what would you define as a...
[51:12.520 --> 51:17.520]  May or may not match up what they define person as in the laws of the state of Oregon,
[51:17.520 --> 51:23.520]  depending upon which code you're reading and which set of definitions you're reading.
[51:23.520 --> 51:32.520]  Where is the definition of person written in Oregon law that goes to this section of statute?
[51:32.520 --> 51:40.520]  See, here in Texas, when the term person is not defined locally within the given statute,
[51:40.520 --> 51:48.520]  the definition of person that's found in chapter 311 of the government code is controlling over every code.
[51:48.520 --> 51:57.520]  Unless the code itself has a local definition that supersedes the one made in chapter 311.
[51:57.520 --> 52:11.520]  So where is the general definition and or the specific local definition that applies to the section of statute you're reading?
[52:11.520 --> 52:19.520]  This is why I'm not letting you read this on the air when you haven't done it right.
[52:19.520 --> 52:22.520]  This is why I want to read it first.
[52:22.520 --> 52:25.520]  This is why I have to know what's in it.
[52:25.520 --> 52:31.520]  You know how I am about spreading false information as fact.
[52:31.520 --> 52:38.520]  I don't do it and I don't let others get away with doing it, do I?
[52:38.520 --> 52:52.520]  You cannot be using the definition out of my seminar material which is based on Texas law in place of what Oregon has.
[52:52.520 --> 52:58.520]  Well, I simply did as I wrote something that is very close to what you would say that it is.
[52:58.520 --> 53:08.520]  Rader, how does that in any way rectify the problem I'm talking about?
[53:08.520 --> 53:21.520]  You are using a definition of person that you did not get from Oregon law and you have not shown to be relative to this section of statute in Oregon law.
[53:21.520 --> 53:26.520]  Am I not being clear about that?
[53:26.520 --> 53:29.520]  Yes, you're being clear about that.
[53:29.520 --> 53:37.520]  What I'm saying is that that would be pretty much a universal definition for what person would be.
[53:37.520 --> 53:44.520]  When you are talking about statutes, there are no universal definitions.
[53:44.520 --> 53:55.520]  They can write a statute where they could write a definition that says person means a bowl of green colored lime flavored jello.
[53:55.520 --> 54:04.520]  Would you consider that to be a universal definition just because it appeared one time in some place in some statute?
[54:04.520 --> 54:06.520]  No, that's far away from something.
[54:06.520 --> 54:08.520]  Okay, that is my point.
[54:08.520 --> 54:17.520]  Till you know how they specifically define that term in relation to this specific statute, you don't have a legal leg to stand on.
[54:17.520 --> 54:27.520]  You take that argument to court, you are going to get punitively uprights with not even so much as any fanfare.
[54:27.520 --> 54:31.520]  Do you understand that?
[54:31.520 --> 54:32.520]  I vaguely do.
[54:32.520 --> 54:33.520]  You vaguely do?
[54:33.520 --> 54:48.520]  I'm saying isn't that a definition of someone at their capacity, not necessarily an individual, but somebody who is on their occupation, somebody who is in their capacity of their profession?
[54:48.520 --> 54:56.520]  Not necessarily.
[54:56.520 --> 55:00.520]  The definition of person is contextual.
[55:00.520 --> 55:07.520]  It is defined by the context of the statutes in which it is contained or defined.
[55:07.520 --> 55:24.520]  Unless there is a general definition supplied which here in Texas there is, that is controlling over every statute and that one is because it specifically says that it is.
[55:24.520 --> 55:38.520]  So unless there is a local one to override it, that one is controlling in every instance in Chapter 311 of the Texas government code.
[55:38.520 --> 55:44.520]  Okay, so you are defining that this can vary from state to state on what the definition could be.
[55:44.520 --> 55:45.520]  I'm not denying it.
[55:45.520 --> 55:52.520]  I'm saying that's exactly what can happen.
[55:52.520 --> 55:54.520]  Do you agree with this?
[55:54.520 --> 55:57.520]  What's the definition of what I wrote here about what a police officer is?
[55:57.520 --> 56:00.520]  Now read what it is.
[56:00.520 --> 56:21.520]  A police officer is a professional person in their official capacity whom is highly trained to apply by necessary means the policies of a municipality including ordinances, codes, and if necessary, the appeal code of that state or state upon the primary
[56:21.520 --> 56:33.520]  employee employed and its official citizens of the municipality including its staff, council, other persons, city managers, city clerks.
[56:33.520 --> 56:36.520]  Okay, stop, stop, stop.
[56:36.520 --> 56:40.520]  Let me give it to you in this context.
[56:40.520 --> 56:43.520]  Do I agree with your definition?
[56:43.520 --> 56:45.520]  Do I agree that it's your definition?
[56:45.520 --> 56:46.520]  Yes.
[56:46.520 --> 56:51.520]  Do I agree it's how the law defines it?
[56:51.520 --> 56:53.520]  Absolutely not.
[56:53.520 --> 56:59.520]  Do I agree that you will win that argument using that as the definition in any court?
[56:59.520 --> 57:04.520]  I do not.
[57:04.520 --> 57:19.520]  You see here in Texas, police officer is actually defined in chapter 541 of the transportation code in relation to and in the context of who is authorized to enforce said code.
[57:19.520 --> 57:22.520]  Okay?
[57:22.520 --> 57:34.520]  There is an actual legal definition of police officer in the transportation code and that definition is the only one that matters.
[57:34.520 --> 57:44.520]  No matter what I want to add or take away, that is the only one that will ever be applied, at least correctly applied.
[57:44.520 --> 57:53.520]  Anything else is conjecture, so your definition by definition is your personal opinion and conjecture.
[57:53.520 --> 58:06.520]  It has no legal basis or authority that you can cite because you have not given me where any law and organ defines the phrase police officer.
[58:06.520 --> 58:10.520]  If it does.
[58:10.520 --> 58:18.520]  And even if it does not, we still have the hierarchy that we must follow in determining what it actually means.
[58:18.520 --> 58:28.520]  And guess where your conclusory opinion of what it's defined as falls in that hierarchy?
[58:28.520 --> 58:29.520]  It doesn't.
[58:29.520 --> 58:31.520]  That's absolutely right.
[58:31.520 --> 58:32.520]  It doesn't.
[58:32.520 --> 58:33.520]  Hang on just a second.
[58:33.520 --> 58:35.520]  Let me finish this up on the other side.
[58:35.520 --> 58:49.520]  512-646-1984, we will be right back after the break.
[58:49.520 --> 58:57.520]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.520 --> 59:06.520]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.520 --> 59:08.520]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.520 --> 59:17.520]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.520 --> 59:27.520]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.520 --> 59:32.520]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.520 --> 59:47.520]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.520 --> 59:49.520]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:49.520 --> 59:56.520]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:20.520 --> 01:00:23.520]  Brent Crude, $62.47 a barrel.
[01:00:23.520 --> 01:00:25.520]  Crypto is an order of market cap.
[01:00:25.520 --> 01:00:29.520]  Bitcoin Core, $10,566.52.
[01:00:29.520 --> 01:00:32.520]  Ethereum, $227.26.
[01:00:32.520 --> 01:00:34.520]  XRP, Ripple, $0.33.
[01:00:34.520 --> 01:00:37.520]  Litecoin, $100.31.
[01:00:37.520 --> 01:00:42.520]  Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:42.520 --> 01:00:59.520]  Today in History, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a timed suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and injuring 40.
[01:00:59.520 --> 01:01:00.520]  Today in History.
[01:01:00.520 --> 01:01:24.520]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing heaven to Texas law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the error for THC.
[01:01:24.520 --> 01:01:33.520]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:33.520 --> 01:02:01.520]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities, too, like the district attorney in El Paso, Kymah Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.520 --> 01:02:12.520]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:12.520 --> 01:02:22.520]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[01:02:22.520 --> 01:02:39.520]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five-and-a-half-inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.520 --> 01:02:51.520]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:51.520 --> 01:03:00.520]  This is Look Roadie with the Lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:00.520 --> 01:03:26.520]  We make our own whiskey and our own smoke, too. Ain't too many things you don't boys can do. We grow good old tomatoes and homemade wine and a country boy can survive. Country folks can survive.
[01:03:26.520 --> 01:03:35.520]  Of course, you can't scrub us out and you can't make us run. Those wooden old boys, pray you don't shot guns.
[01:03:35.520 --> 01:03:44.520]  We say praise and we pray, ma'am, if you ain't into that, we don't give a damn.
[01:03:44.520 --> 01:03:55.520]  We came from the West Virginia coal mines and the rocky mountains and the western skies.
[01:03:55.520 --> 01:04:03.520]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:04:03.520 --> 01:04:06.520]  And we're still talking with Truth Raider.
[01:04:06.520 --> 01:04:10.520]  Now Raider, please understand something. I'm not trying to jump down your throat just because it's you.
[01:04:10.520 --> 01:04:14.520]  I'm trying to get you to understand the importance of doing this stuff right.
[01:04:14.520 --> 01:04:21.520]  And what you're doing is you're coming up with these ideas, which if you just want to write about them, that's all well and good.
[01:04:21.520 --> 01:04:27.520]  When you're going to try to say this is the definition of something and try to make it seem to be factual,
[01:04:27.520 --> 01:04:35.520]  when the title of your document says these are the facts, that's not factual, dude. That's a problem.
[01:04:35.520 --> 01:04:46.520]  Yeah, granted. Granted Eddie, thank you. It is precisely that. It's ideas that I wrote down and I wanted to read them to you and see what you thought about them.
[01:04:46.520 --> 01:04:49.520]  And that's what I'm trying to tell you.
[01:04:49.520 --> 01:04:58.520]  What I thought about them is you're not basing them on law. So how can your title be accurate?
[01:04:58.520 --> 01:05:07.520]  It's concerning what the law would be and what I think it would be. And the reason why I wrote it in that format is because I believe,
[01:05:07.520 --> 01:05:13.520]  and most people would believe that what I wrote in here would be accurate and should be the way...
[01:05:13.520 --> 01:05:21.520]  Well, that's the problem, isn't it? That's like the lemmings that believe the guy at the front of the herd knows where he's going.
[01:05:21.520 --> 01:05:26.520]  Yeah. Tell me about that. Okay.
[01:05:26.520 --> 01:05:35.520]  Okay, so the point here is if you're going to give them facts, then make sure it's factual. This is also why you can't look at just one statute.
[01:05:35.520 --> 01:05:46.520]  This is exactly why the courts themselves have said you have to take the law as a whole. You can't just piecemeal it and get the whole picture.
[01:05:46.520 --> 01:05:55.520]  So you have to be looking elsewhere. Search your state statutes for the phrase police officer means and see what you come up with.
[01:05:55.520 --> 01:06:02.520]  See if there is a definition somewhere in some code that would allow it to be used here.
[01:06:02.520 --> 01:06:08.520]  And if it doesn't allow it to be used here, then there's only one other place to go.
[01:06:08.520 --> 01:06:14.520]  Does your penal code in the state of Oregon contain a definition for police officer?
[01:06:14.520 --> 01:06:24.520]  If so, that definition can be used across all statutes, according to the courts, not according to the statutes themselves, but according to the courts.
[01:06:24.520 --> 01:06:33.520]  But when you see the following phrases in this chapter mean that's the limiting scope of that definition.
[01:06:33.520 --> 01:06:47.520]  This chapter, because it will say in this chapter or in this section or in this title, the following words and phrases mean that is its entire legal scope.
[01:06:47.520 --> 01:06:54.520]  It cannot be used outside of that scope and be a reliable interpretation and usage.
[01:06:54.520 --> 01:07:05.520]  Why? Because the legislature specifically limited to that context with those words.
[01:07:05.520 --> 01:07:12.520]  Alright, that's fine. Just keep in mind I'm not at all using this toward any case.
[01:07:12.520 --> 01:07:22.520]  I'm not saying you are using it toward a case, but if you're writing it down with the intent of spreading it around to other people, it needs to be right.
[01:07:22.520 --> 01:07:27.520]  Right, exactly. So it's just a draft that it came up with.
[01:07:27.520 --> 01:07:34.520]  And obviously I've got to go match that, that's what you're telling me, but I've got to go match that with what is in the revised statute.
[01:07:34.520 --> 01:07:44.520]  Ah, no, I don't think you're going to match it. You need to find where specifically defined and replace it with an actual fact.
[01:07:44.520 --> 01:07:47.520]  Right, that's what it means.
[01:07:47.520 --> 01:07:52.520]  Alright, so it's two or three paragraphs. I'm more than happy to email it to you if you'd like to look over it.
[01:07:52.520 --> 01:07:58.520]  Well, you didn't say anything about having to like it. You just said you would want me to read it, so email it.
[01:07:58.520 --> 01:08:05.520]  Yeah, I'll go ahead and do what you think. I think it's fairly articulate.
[01:08:05.520 --> 01:08:17.520]  And it would be along those lines where, yeah, that seems to be right, but I need to push it up, change a few things there, and base it on what it actually looks like.
[01:08:17.520 --> 01:08:26.520]  Well, what you do with it afterwards entirely up to you, but I'm just telling you, don't say that it's the facts and then give things that aren't facts, but your opinion in place of facts.
[01:08:26.520 --> 01:08:32.520]  Alright, well, I'll send it to you and see what you think about it later on.
[01:08:32.520 --> 01:08:33.520]  Okay.
[01:08:33.520 --> 01:08:40.520]  I put my heart into that. I have a question for you. Please do this for us one more time if you may.
[01:08:40.520 --> 01:08:49.520]  You were speaking several months ago about police officers. The whole department, the whole concept of a police department should not exist.
[01:08:49.520 --> 01:08:53.520]  Would you please make a comment one more time to why?
[01:08:53.520 --> 01:09:01.520]  Because there is no constitutional authority for them. In fact, there is a constitutional prohibition on police departments.
[01:09:01.520 --> 01:09:09.520]  They are the standing army the Constitution specifically prohibits.
[01:09:09.520 --> 01:09:14.520]  Jake, in the Constitution, what section should I go to to look that up?
[01:09:14.520 --> 01:09:17.520]  Standing army is not a hard phrase to find.
[01:09:17.520 --> 01:09:20.520]  They understand that phrase, standing army.
[01:09:20.520 --> 01:09:29.520]  Yeah, the United States Constitution forbids any state to have a standing army and that is what a police force is.
[01:09:29.520 --> 01:09:37.520]  So there's nothing in there where they can have a provision to have police officers for their municipality for their own purposes.
[01:09:37.520 --> 01:09:46.520]  If they're going to use them as security guards and security guards only, yeah, but as a public enforcement agency, no.
[01:09:46.520 --> 01:09:49.520]  Okay, so the sheriff does not?
[01:09:49.520 --> 01:09:57.520]  The sheriff is a constitutionally elected official. That's a completely different thing from a police department.
[01:09:57.520 --> 01:10:06.520]  Right, so do they have or do they not have any say about that, about police departments?
[01:10:06.520 --> 01:10:08.520]  Does who not have any say?
[01:10:08.520 --> 01:10:13.520]  The sheriff in any office, any sheriff.
[01:10:13.520 --> 01:10:21.520]  The sheriff could arrest every municipal cop he comes across doing any dang thing that breaks a law, but he doesn't.
[01:10:21.520 --> 01:10:26.520]  Right, so they kind of turn the other way.
[01:10:26.520 --> 01:10:32.520]  The sheriff is following the laws of the state. It's the legislature that allowed this to happen.
[01:10:32.520 --> 01:10:37.520]  Legislature, okay, got it. We're searching for that.
[01:10:37.520 --> 01:10:42.520]  Okay, that's the idea. It's about two or three paragraphs long of what I wrote down.
[01:10:42.520 --> 01:10:45.520]  Senator, just please email them. I got other callers up here.
[01:10:45.520 --> 01:10:46.520]  I'll do it.
[01:10:46.520 --> 01:10:47.520]  All right, thanks.
[01:10:47.520 --> 01:10:48.520]  All right, thank you.
[01:10:48.520 --> 01:10:49.520]  Thanks, and God bless.
[01:10:49.520 --> 01:10:51.520]  You too.
[01:10:51.520 --> 01:10:56.520]  All right, now we have Charles in Texas. Charles, what do you got?
[01:10:56.520 --> 01:10:58.520]  How are you doing, Eddie?
[01:10:58.520 --> 01:11:01.520]  He's Texas Cripple here.
[01:11:01.520 --> 01:11:11.520]  I'm like that. I have a concern about the mandates and stuff going out, but I've gotten two after that purpose thing on the Facebook page.
[01:11:11.520 --> 01:11:18.520]  I've gotten two very surprising responses. One is an activist who...
[01:11:18.520 --> 01:11:26.520]  Okay, hang on just a second. Charles, I need you to get closer to your phone or whatever it is because I'm not really appearing you that well.
[01:11:26.520 --> 01:11:28.520]  How's that?
[01:11:28.520 --> 01:11:35.520]  No different. You don't have me on a speakerphone or a headset or anything, do you?
[01:11:35.520 --> 01:11:39.520]  No, I'm on my phone. It's right here on my ear.
[01:11:39.520 --> 01:11:44.520]  Okay. All right, well, go ahead. Just try to speak a little louder.
[01:11:44.520 --> 01:11:49.520]  Okay, well, now I posted several things on the Facebook pages.
[01:11:49.520 --> 01:12:02.520]  And what gets me is, one's supposed to be an activist who's willing to knuckle under him because his county was charging him $1,000 for violating the face mask.
[01:12:02.520 --> 01:12:14.520]  And the other one is a preacher who thinks we ought to go ahead and get together and file a class action lawsuit against the governor of the state, Texas, overstate, going over his governmental authority.
[01:12:14.520 --> 01:12:17.520]  You know, and that surprised me.
[01:12:17.520 --> 01:12:21.520]  And basically, I just want to see what your opinion was on either one of those situations.
[01:12:21.520 --> 01:12:25.520]  Now, I don't really have much of a question. I just want to see what your opinion is.
[01:12:25.520 --> 01:12:30.520]  Well, who did he say would charge him $1,000 for not wearing one? The first guy?
[01:12:30.520 --> 01:12:32.520]  The county sheriff and police.
[01:12:32.520 --> 01:12:39.520]  They don't have any more authority to assess a fine than the people making the rules they're trying to use as the basis for the fine.
[01:12:39.520 --> 01:12:45.520]  They can charge them all they want. They're not going to win in court. They can't win in court.
[01:12:45.520 --> 01:12:50.520]  There is no law upon which to base any such charge.
[01:12:50.520 --> 01:12:54.520]  There is absolutely no law.
[01:12:54.520 --> 01:13:02.520]  Because there's my understanding that they really could not go any further than the state or the federal authority.
[01:13:02.520 --> 01:13:10.520]  Well, they couldn't know. The federal authority has no authority within the borders of the states. Absolutely none.
[01:13:10.520 --> 01:13:16.520]  Tenth Amendment prohibits them from having a damn thing to do with that. They absolutely have none.
[01:13:16.520 --> 01:13:23.520]  They can mandate to the cows come home, and it's no more effective law than what the governors are doing.
[01:13:23.520 --> 01:13:29.520]  Well, that mostly was the state. The state made this mandate $250.
[01:13:29.520 --> 01:13:39.520]  No, the states didn't make the mandates. The governors and the judges in the states made the mandates, and they have no authority to make them.
[01:13:39.520 --> 01:13:41.520]  Oh, I understand that.
[01:13:41.520 --> 01:13:54.520]  That seems to me that this county in particular is kind of repressive and even has tighter restrictions on its people than the governors mandate.
[01:13:54.520 --> 01:14:02.520]  The only way anyone is going to win the argument is to fight, and if they're just going to count out to it, fighting is not an option for them.
[01:14:02.520 --> 01:14:11.520]  So how they respond to your post, I wouldn't worry about it. They can be a sheep for themselves if they want to be, but they're not going to make me be one with them.
[01:14:11.520 --> 01:14:25.520]  As far as the class action lawsuit, in order for class action to carry, it would have to be enough people that could show that they were harmed by the executive orders by either being prosecuted,
[01:14:25.520 --> 01:14:34.520]  that they lost their business or lost earnings and income because of it, or suffered some other tangible harm they could prove in a court of law.
[01:14:34.520 --> 01:14:42.520]  And then they would have to be able to get class action status in order to sue, and the court would have to declare they would have standing to sue,
[01:14:42.520 --> 01:14:49.520]  and whether or not the governor would have qualified or official immunity from being sued.
[01:14:49.520 --> 01:15:02.520]  Even though he broke the law and he violated constitutional protections, there shouldn't be any court standing in the way of prosecuting him for that, or suing him for that, but they will.
[01:15:02.520 --> 01:15:10.520]  Yeah, because I told him you need to do, I told the one person, you need to do more research before you even think about filing a lawsuit.
[01:15:10.520 --> 01:15:22.520]  Yeah, class action lawsuits are, they're intended to line the pockets of the attorneys handling the case, not the people that actually suffered a harm.
[01:15:22.520 --> 01:15:32.520]  Yes, that's what I was telling him, you need to really do a lot more research on that because, yes, we've seen another state, we've seen other states' orders have gone down,
[01:15:32.520 --> 01:15:41.520]  or they've been made unconstitutional, so to reconsider, but none of those have happened here in Texas as far as I know of.
[01:15:41.520 --> 01:15:52.520]  So I mean, that's a whole new ground, and I told him you need to go back, you need to do more research, you need to talk to someone who actually knows a lot more of what they're doing than just saying,
[01:15:52.520 --> 01:15:59.520]  I want to sue the governor, because you may be able to account for them, you can't close.
[01:15:59.520 --> 01:16:05.520]  Yeah, or starting a battle is going to cost you money without getting you anywhere.
[01:16:05.520 --> 01:16:13.520]  That's what I was thinking too, you know, that's just that stuff, I just want to get your opinion on it, because I think everybody needs to hear this,
[01:16:13.520 --> 01:16:24.520]  and hey, you know, we need, yes, we don't like it, yes, we need to know what's going on, what we can do about it, you know, and we need to know exactly where we stand to be able to do stuff.
[01:16:24.520 --> 01:16:33.520]  It's important to have someone's opinion on it that actually knows the laws and has had the experience that you have in dealing with it.
[01:16:33.520 --> 01:16:38.520]  I mean, I didn't really have that quick, I just wanted your opinion on that, so everybody has to listen to it.
[01:16:38.520 --> 01:16:41.520]  Well, there you go.
[01:16:41.520 --> 01:16:49.520]  Yeah, I know I hear the music, so I'm going to let you go, but thank you for getting that on the air and keeping us strong, man.
[01:16:49.520 --> 01:16:53.520]  Alright, well, I appreciate you, and y'all hanging in there.
[01:16:53.520 --> 01:16:55.520]  Okay, you've touched the triple out.
[01:16:55.520 --> 01:16:57.520]  Alright, have a good night.
[01:16:57.520 --> 01:17:26.520]  Alright folks, we'll be right back.
[01:17:27.520 --> 01:17:30.520]  $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:30.520 --> 01:17:35.520]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:35.520 --> 01:17:39.520]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:39.520 --> 01:17:48.520]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logo's Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[01:17:48.520 --> 01:17:55.520]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:55.520 --> 01:18:00.520]  Go to Logo's Radio Network dot com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.520 --> 01:18:05.520]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.520 --> 01:18:09.520]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[01:18:09.520 --> 01:18:14.520]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win too.
[01:18:14.520 --> 01:18:20.520]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:18:20.520 --> 01:18:26.520]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:18:26.520 --> 01:18:29.520]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:18:29.520 --> 01:18:33.520]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:18:33.520 --> 01:18:38.520]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:38.520 --> 01:18:41.520]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.520 --> 01:18:46.520]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner.
[01:18:46.520 --> 01:18:57.520]  Or email Michael Mirris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:18:57.520 --> 01:19:21.520]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:21.520 --> 01:19:28.520]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I take a look at my life and realize there's nothing left,
[01:19:28.520 --> 01:19:32.520]  because I've been impressed and they laugh at so long that even my mother...
[01:19:32.520 --> 01:19:40.520]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:40.520 --> 01:19:45.520]  Alright, right now we have Chris in Colorado. Chris, what can we do for you?
[01:19:45.520 --> 01:19:47.520]  Hey Eddie, how you doing?
[01:19:47.520 --> 01:19:49.520]  Alright, and you?
[01:19:49.520 --> 01:19:52.520]  I'm okay.
[01:19:52.520 --> 01:19:54.520]  You sound so positive.
[01:19:54.520 --> 01:20:02.520]  Well, I'm trying to stay positive, I'm trying to stay sane and as madness, but there's always a pocket of beauty in everything.
[01:20:02.520 --> 01:20:08.520]  I have a quick question and then another question to see if you were able to help us.
[01:20:08.520 --> 01:20:13.520]  Who can we call on the police? I think I heard you earlier talk about the sheriff.
[01:20:13.520 --> 01:20:17.520]  I understand the constables, the only one that can arrest the sheriff.
[01:20:17.520 --> 01:20:23.520]  In a situation where we're dealing with the police, and we don't like it where it's headed,
[01:20:23.520 --> 01:20:28.520]  and we just want to go ahead and get some other authority in there, do I just go straight to the sheriff in the area,
[01:20:28.520 --> 01:20:31.520]  or is that not going to work because I'm in a city or something like that?
[01:20:31.520 --> 01:20:41.520]  That all depends upon what kind of relationship the sheriff has with that department, that local police department.
[01:20:41.520 --> 01:20:49.520]  You can always go talk to him, now whether or not he's going to go talk to them afterwards in your favor or against you,
[01:20:49.520 --> 01:20:55.520]  that's a whole other issue, that's why it pays to know who's getting elected before they actually get elected,
[01:20:55.520 --> 01:21:00.520]  what they stand for and why, and who they are as an individual.
[01:21:00.520 --> 01:21:07.520]  The better you know your sheriff, the better you know whether or not that man should ever have the power he's got.
[01:21:07.520 --> 01:21:17.520]  Even if you don't have an issue with the local police at the moment, it would be a very good idea to get to know your sheriff very well.
[01:21:17.520 --> 01:21:29.520]  I travel a lot. I don't have a whole lot of problems with people ever, and right now I'm actually pretty much in favor of police and especially the sheriff.
[01:21:29.520 --> 01:21:32.520]  I'm just really digging what the sheriff is saying in a lot of counties.
[01:21:32.520 --> 01:21:38.520]  Especially that guy down in Clay County, Florida, you know, it's just kind of what I'm looking at, but I'm also just want to be educated.
[01:21:38.520 --> 01:21:47.520]  So if I have a problem with, say I get pulled over and I just, I don't want to have any issue with this guy, you know, because he's going to have authority over me.
[01:21:47.520 --> 01:21:50.520]  Who do I call 911? Do I call the sheriff on this guy?
[01:21:50.520 --> 01:21:56.520]  Well, the problem is I would not use 911 to call the other agency.
[01:21:56.520 --> 01:22:08.520]  Now, what you could do is if you want to verify, the problem is you can't verify when he's behind you who this guy that's following you with his life on works for.
[01:22:08.520 --> 01:22:20.520]  You won't know anything about him until he gets up to your car window and tells you who he is, and only then would you be able to call to check and see if he's telling you the truth about who he is.
[01:22:20.520 --> 01:22:22.520]  You get what I'm saying?
[01:22:22.520 --> 01:22:29.520]  Yeah, but I'm actually looking for just who can arrest who, I guess that's what I'm looking for.
[01:22:29.520 --> 01:22:36.520]  The sheriff can arrest anybody if he feels there's a law that's been broken that would require them to be arrested.
[01:22:36.520 --> 01:22:48.520]  But the problem there is, is yeah, you've got a jurisdictional issue over who can arrest who under certain conditions otherwise as far as that goes.
[01:22:48.520 --> 01:23:05.520]  But again, it depends on which officer is first on scene. If you're inside a corporate city limit and they have a municipal police department and the municipal police department is the one that initiates contact with you, they're going to have jurisdiction to make an arrest of you.
[01:23:05.520 --> 01:23:15.520]  The sheriff won't be able to arrest you in their place unless there's an outstanding warrant that requires the sheriff to be the one to take custody.
[01:23:15.520 --> 01:23:16.520]  You follow?
[01:23:16.520 --> 01:23:28.520]  So if I'm in a big city and there's obviously a lot of police and they do their thing and it turns out to be a fiasco and I want to call somebody on that situation.
[01:23:28.520 --> 01:23:40.520]  You can call them to stand there and be present, but whether or not they're going to do anything or interact with you directly beyond, hey, why did you call me? I can't say.
[01:23:40.520 --> 01:23:46.520]  This once again is why it's so important to know the sheriff in the area we're talking about.
[01:23:46.520 --> 01:23:56.520]  Because you can, by getting to know him, you're going to find out whether or not he has any beefs with the police department or any of the things that police department does.
[01:23:56.520 --> 01:24:11.520]  And you can let him know that you yourself have had problems with him and I'm concerned about him. So if they stop me, I don't feel comfortable asking for one of their supervisors. I'd rather call one of your guys to come out and make sure they don't do something to harm me.
[01:24:11.520 --> 01:24:13.520]  You know what I'm saying?
[01:24:13.520 --> 01:24:21.520]  Yeah, that's true. I'm finding the sheriff's office a little more, well, there are definitely a lot more constitutional, at least from what I've been hearing and seeing.
[01:24:21.520 --> 01:24:26.520]  Well, he's the only one that's elected. The rest of them are all appointed.
[01:24:26.520 --> 01:24:29.520]  Right. Yeah.
[01:24:29.520 --> 01:24:33.520]  Okay, well, we'll play that game if it ever comes up.
[01:24:33.520 --> 01:24:44.520]  Yeah, I'd say there is no pat answer to your question because the politics in every place you can go will be vastly different.
[01:24:44.520 --> 01:24:51.520]  And if you think politics isn't going to play a role in this, then you're deluding yourself.
[01:24:51.520 --> 01:25:02.520]  Yeah, well, again, I'm sitting in a park right now in Colorado and I watch the police come through here and they have a sheriff come through here. It's a pretty interesting thing, you know.
[01:25:02.520 --> 01:25:09.520]  And generally, this is a sheriff. They tend to patrol this area, but there are some police that come through here.
[01:25:09.520 --> 01:25:13.520]  And a little bark order to kids for being stupid in the skate park or whatever.
[01:25:13.520 --> 01:25:22.520]  Now, I used to have a house up there in Aurora and they used to chase me through some of those parks up there, but they never caught me.
[01:25:22.520 --> 01:25:24.520]  Okay.
[01:25:24.520 --> 01:25:31.520]  All right, so my other question is, I'm not sure this is in your expertise, but this happened in Chicago.
[01:25:31.520 --> 01:25:35.520]  I'm going to have to share the story a little bit, but I am trying to figure out how to proceed here.
[01:25:35.520 --> 01:25:42.520]  This is not a traffic stop. This is a towing situation and moving through kind of a legal system.
[01:25:42.520 --> 01:25:48.520]  I've had great success so far on my own, but the next step is going up against an insurance company and the tow company.
[01:25:48.520 --> 01:25:54.520]  So if you've got a couple of minutes, I can share the story and then maybe you can tell me whether you have some guidance or not.
[01:25:54.520 --> 01:25:56.520]  Okay.
[01:25:56.520 --> 01:26:05.520]  Okay. Two years and three months ago, April 27th, I got towed in Chicago, came back to my car after eating. It was gone.
[01:26:05.520 --> 01:26:12.520]  I thought it was stolen, called the police. They couldn't figure out where it was, so then I found this sign in the property that I always see.
[01:26:12.520 --> 01:26:14.520]  So when you got the car out...
[01:26:14.520 --> 01:26:17.520]  Wait, what do you mean you found the signs?
[01:26:17.520 --> 01:26:23.520]  Well, there's the towing signs, you know, for this is the towing company that patrols that area.
[01:26:23.520 --> 01:26:31.520]  Okay. And were those signs posted in compliance with the law on how those signs have to be in order to provide notice about parking there?
[01:26:31.520 --> 01:26:36.520]  Oh, no. That's where the story gets good. So I knew something was up. I knew something was stunk, right?
[01:26:36.520 --> 01:26:40.520]  Because it's the first time it ever happened to me, but I knew something was stunk.
[01:26:40.520 --> 01:26:45.520]  And so I get my car out and then I started digging. I started digging hard.
[01:26:45.520 --> 01:26:53.520]  And about three months later, I'm talking to the ICC, which is the Commerce Commission that oversees towing.
[01:26:53.520 --> 01:27:00.520]  They have some vague rules as to how the signage is supposed to work and what the towing companies have to go by because it's a state level, right?
[01:27:00.520 --> 01:27:08.520]  She turned me on to a law that got passed back in 2016 by some aldermen who were fed up with the Chicago towing scene.
[01:27:08.520 --> 01:27:16.520]  And when I read that, I knew it. Okay, I knew I had it. And so yes, they answered your question. No, they were in complete violation.
[01:27:16.520 --> 01:27:25.520]  And a year and a half later, I got an investigation done by the new department that was overseeing that because it was kind of a new law
[01:27:25.520 --> 01:27:30.520]  and it had been delegated to the BACP and the police, but neither department really knew what was going on.
[01:27:30.520 --> 01:27:33.520]  But I finally got to the right people. They did do an investigation.
[01:27:33.520 --> 01:27:38.520]  I made sure that the person doing an investigation had knowledge of all the laws that I saw on that.
[01:27:38.520 --> 01:27:40.520]  I pointed them all out and all the violations.
[01:27:40.520 --> 01:27:43.520]  So they ended up writing seven violations.
[01:27:43.520 --> 01:27:50.520]  They brought them into court and they found them guilty of consumer fraud, which I didn't see coming, but that was nice in addition to the other one.
[01:27:50.520 --> 01:27:58.520]  So I have a judgment from the city in the court of administrative hearings, I guess that's what it's called.
[01:27:58.520 --> 01:28:01.520]  You have a judgment in whose side were yours?
[01:28:01.520 --> 01:28:02.520]  Mine, yeah.
[01:28:02.520 --> 01:28:03.520]  Okay.
[01:28:03.520 --> 01:28:12.520]  Well, it's kind of twofold. I didn't get anything about my money that I paid for the towback, but they did a bunch of damage to my car.
[01:28:12.520 --> 01:28:15.520]  And I still haven't got that result.
[01:28:15.520 --> 01:28:20.520]  So I do have this judgment, definitely a good strike against them.
[01:28:20.520 --> 01:28:22.520]  And that's going to be good for me if I ever go to court.
[01:28:22.520 --> 01:28:26.520]  The problem is, is I've got this insurance company, they're the ones I have to pay.
[01:28:26.520 --> 01:28:32.520]  My expenses are up to like 20 grand now because of traveling there and all and doing the investigations on my side.
[01:28:32.520 --> 01:28:37.520]  And I've got photographs and photographs and photographs of these guys still breaking the law intentionally.
[01:28:37.520 --> 01:28:38.520]  Just crazy stuff.
[01:28:38.520 --> 01:28:39.520]  The signage is pretty big.
[01:28:39.520 --> 01:28:43.520]  You have to hold it in a certain place, but not even putting the signs up.
[01:28:43.520 --> 01:28:47.520]  They're just giving the big middle finger to the city, right?
[01:28:47.520 --> 01:28:50.520]  So now I have a lawsuit to file.
[01:28:50.520 --> 01:29:04.520]  And I wrote a demand letter, kind of an angle of a tort letter to the insurance company basically saying, you know, let's keep this private and negotiation private so we don't go into the public sector and have to deal with this and get everybody's cost up.
[01:29:04.520 --> 01:29:06.520]  And, you know, I had a little bit of training on that.
[01:29:06.520 --> 01:29:12.520]  They're so incompetent that they're not even reading the laws that their client is liable to.
[01:29:12.520 --> 01:29:18.520]  And I even sent them the judgment against their client and they're still like, well, you were parking legal.
[01:29:18.520 --> 01:29:21.520]  So we're not going to pay you for any damages that you claim.
[01:29:21.520 --> 01:29:31.520]  So I've got an arrogant and incompetent insurance company and I've got a tow company who won't even talk to me ever since day one.
[01:29:31.520 --> 01:29:35.520]  So your only recourse there is going to be to sue them in a judicial court.
[01:29:35.520 --> 01:29:39.520]  The administrative court is fine as far as the administrative agency side of it goes.
[01:29:39.520 --> 01:29:48.520]  But if you want to recover the damages to your car, your expenses, your attorney's fees and all that, you've got to sue them in a judicial court case.
[01:29:48.520 --> 01:29:53.520]  So it's a civil suit, not an administrative suit.
[01:29:53.520 --> 01:29:55.520]  Well, the administrative, I didn't file that.
[01:29:55.520 --> 01:29:57.520]  That was done by the city and themselves.
[01:29:57.520 --> 01:29:58.520]  They're the ones who sue them.
[01:29:58.520 --> 01:30:00.520]  Okay. Well, hang on.
[01:30:00.520 --> 01:30:05.520]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number and date of birth.
[01:30:05.520 --> 01:30:08.520]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:30:08.520 --> 01:30:11.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:39.520 --> 01:30:42.520]  StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.520 --> 01:30:45.520]  Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere.
[01:30:45.520 --> 01:30:49.520]  But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:30:49.520 --> 01:30:56.520]  I leave blank spaces on forms all the time or I write N slash A for not applicable and usually nobody notices or cares.
[01:30:56.520 --> 01:31:03.520]  I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement
[01:31:03.520 --> 01:31:09.520]  and I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me and that's pretty rare.
[01:31:09.520 --> 01:31:14.520]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:14.520 --> 01:31:18.520]  It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:31:18.520 --> 01:31:23.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:23.520 --> 01:31:35.520]  I lost my son, my uncle, my uncle on September 11th, 2000.
[01:31:35.520 --> 01:31:39.520]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[01:31:39.520 --> 01:31:43.520]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:43.520 --> 01:31:47.520]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down building 7.
[01:31:47.520 --> 01:31:53.520]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers has looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.520 --> 01:31:56.520]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:56.520 --> 01:31:58.520]  Go to building what.org.
[01:31:58.520 --> 01:32:01.520]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.520 --> 01:32:05.520]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[01:32:05.520 --> 01:32:08.520]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society.
[01:32:08.520 --> 01:32:13.520]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.520 --> 01:32:18.520]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[01:32:18.520 --> 01:32:20.520]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.520 --> 01:32:26.520]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.520 --> 01:32:29.520]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.520 --> 01:32:34.520]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:34.520 --> 01:32:36.520]  and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.520 --> 01:32:40.520]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:40.520 --> 01:32:43.520]  and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[01:32:43.520 --> 01:32:46.520]  The Texas Transportation Code, a law versus a lie.
[01:32:46.520 --> 01:32:48.520]  Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:48.520 --> 01:32:51.520]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.520 --> 01:32:55.520]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.520 --> 01:32:59.520]  Order your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:04.520 --> 01:33:07.520]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:33:07.520 --> 01:33:11.520]  At LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:37.520 --> 01:33:41.520]  Logos Radio Network
[01:33:52.520 --> 01:33:56.520]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:56.520 --> 01:34:00.520]  We are now in the last half hour of the show, 512-646-1984,
[01:34:00.520 --> 01:34:03.520]  and we are talking to Chris and Colorado.
[01:34:03.520 --> 01:34:06.520]  Alright, Chris, please go ahead.
[01:34:06.520 --> 01:34:12.520]  So, I'm going up something, I've gotten something pretty big in my mind,
[01:34:12.520 --> 01:34:17.520]  meaning an insurance company that's got quite a bit of cash to dish out to lawyers
[01:34:17.520 --> 01:34:21.520]  and probably has their own lawyer firm, law firm working for them.
[01:34:21.520 --> 01:34:24.520]  But I also know they're the ones that have the money, so if I do go to court,
[01:34:24.520 --> 01:34:27.520]  I'm not going to ask for the money that I have to dish out myself,
[01:34:27.520 --> 01:34:29.520]  which is about, I'm going to get into $20,000 right now.
[01:34:29.520 --> 01:34:32.520]  I'm going to ask five out of ten times that, so I can get into the federal court.
[01:34:32.520 --> 01:34:36.520]  Well, you can sue them not only for the damages, but you can try to see
[01:34:36.520 --> 01:34:42.520]  if anything they did was criminal, then you can seek punitive damages.
[01:34:42.520 --> 01:34:45.520]  Well, I've got them on criminal. They've already been convicted of it. They have a criminal...
[01:34:45.520 --> 01:34:50.520]  No, no, no, no, no. An administrative conviction is not a criminal conviction.
[01:34:50.520 --> 01:34:54.520]  You're talking two completely different things here.
[01:34:54.520 --> 01:34:56.520]  Okay.
[01:34:56.520 --> 01:35:02.520]  Now, if they illegally took your car, did you file charges for Grand Theft Auto
[01:35:02.520 --> 01:35:05.520]  or whatever it is in Colorado?
[01:35:05.520 --> 01:35:07.520]  This isn't Chicago that's happened.
[01:35:07.520 --> 01:35:11.520]  Okay, in Chicago, did you file charges for destruction of private property
[01:35:11.520 --> 01:35:14.520]  or damage to private property or burglary of a vehicle?
[01:35:14.520 --> 01:35:18.520]  Any of those things you could have filed criminal charges on.
[01:35:18.520 --> 01:35:22.520]  Okay, and you could have filed them against the tow truck driver.
[01:35:22.520 --> 01:35:26.520]  And you could have filed them against his manager because the manager is the one
[01:35:26.520 --> 01:35:31.520]  who's telling him to take the car. So that's a conspiracy. That's criminal conspiracy.
[01:35:31.520 --> 01:35:35.520]  You see how this can pile up real quick?
[01:35:35.520 --> 01:35:42.520]  Right. So the whole premise of me being towed and the whole thing they hide behind the guys
[01:35:42.520 --> 01:35:46.520]  is that everybody who comes in there that's kind of unknowing is illegally parked.
[01:35:46.520 --> 01:35:49.520]  So that's what they say. You're a legally parked. I can take your car.
[01:35:49.520 --> 01:35:52.520]  There's a gray area and obviously there's corruption there.
[01:35:52.520 --> 01:35:55.520]  No, there's a slight problem with their argument.
[01:35:55.520 --> 01:35:59.520]  You cannot be illegally parked on private property
[01:35:59.520 --> 01:36:04.520]  when the individuals that are towing your car under the claim of illegally parked
[01:36:04.520 --> 01:36:08.520]  have no authority legally to operate on that private property.
[01:36:08.520 --> 01:36:10.520]  That's Grand Theft Auto.
[01:36:10.520 --> 01:36:15.520]  It no is, no is, no buts.
[01:36:15.520 --> 01:36:19.520]  They have a contract with the owner of the property to be there.
[01:36:19.520 --> 01:36:23.520]  Irrelevant. If they didn't post the property correctly,
[01:36:23.520 --> 01:36:30.520]  then their actions in relation to any signs about towing are illegal.
[01:36:30.520 --> 01:36:34.520]  Are they not? Is that not what the administrative court ruled?
[01:36:34.520 --> 01:36:36.520]  Yes.
[01:36:36.520 --> 01:36:42.520]  Okay. Then you could have filed criminal charges against them the moment you got that ruling.
[01:36:42.520 --> 01:36:48.520]  Oh, shit. Sorry.
[01:36:48.520 --> 01:36:53.520]  God, I hope I haven't lost my stats of limitation because that's a beautiful angle.
[01:36:53.520 --> 01:36:57.520]  The moment the administrative court said your actions were entirely illegal
[01:36:57.520 --> 01:37:01.520]  because you did not have the site properly posted,
[01:37:01.520 --> 01:37:08.520]  the moment they laid hands on your car and removed it without your consent, it was theft.
[01:37:08.520 --> 01:37:10.520]  Oh, wow.
[01:37:10.520 --> 01:37:17.520]  If they broke into your car once they took it behind their fence, it's burglary of a vehicle.
[01:37:17.520 --> 01:37:20.520]  They had to break into my car to get into it.
[01:37:20.520 --> 01:37:21.520]  There you go.
[01:37:21.520 --> 01:37:23.520]  Take off the brake, the parking brake.
[01:37:23.520 --> 01:37:25.520]  There you go.
[01:37:25.520 --> 01:37:29.520]  Oh, wow.
[01:37:29.520 --> 01:37:32.520]  They had to break your window, right?
[01:37:32.520 --> 01:37:39.520]  No. They tried the tool and then the tool didn't work so they tried the door open.
[01:37:39.520 --> 01:37:41.520]  They damaged the door.
[01:37:41.520 --> 01:37:42.520]  Oh, yeah.
[01:37:42.520 --> 01:37:46.520]  Okay. Then that's destruction of private property or vandalism of a vehicle.
[01:37:46.520 --> 01:37:48.520]  Take your pick.
[01:37:48.520 --> 01:37:51.520]  Well, I had all this stuff. I'll put it all in there.
[01:37:51.520 --> 01:37:52.520]  This is great.
[01:37:52.520 --> 01:37:56.520]  And then when they towed it, they scratched up the indent at the whole right side.
[01:37:56.520 --> 01:37:58.520]  That still goes to damage your private property.
[01:37:58.520 --> 01:37:59.520]  Criminal missed you.
[01:37:59.520 --> 01:38:01.520]  Okay.
[01:38:01.520 --> 01:38:03.520]  Huh. Okay.
[01:38:03.520 --> 01:38:07.520]  So I need to figure out which department to file that with.
[01:38:07.520 --> 01:38:11.520]  Well, if it was inch, you say it was in Chicago, right?
[01:38:11.520 --> 01:38:12.520]  Right.
[01:38:12.520 --> 01:38:17.520]  Then it'll be in Chicago Police Department.
[01:38:17.520 --> 01:38:18.520]  Wow.
[01:38:18.520 --> 01:38:27.520]  Just pick the one, the whatever department is closest to precinct is closest to where that occurred.
[01:38:27.520 --> 01:38:29.520]  So I have been dealing with a woman there.
[01:38:29.520 --> 01:38:32.520]  I'm going to need to call back in and let you go here since you got sent on the caller.
[01:38:32.520 --> 01:38:38.520]  But I have been dealing with one of the detectives and sergeants there who deals with this thing.
[01:38:38.520 --> 01:38:40.520]  And they haven't mentioned anything about filing this.
[01:38:40.520 --> 01:38:41.520]  Well, of course not.
[01:38:41.520 --> 01:38:46.520]  Because as long as it's in the administrative court, they have no charges to levy against them.
[01:38:46.520 --> 01:38:48.520]  If they're operating properly, they can't touch them.
[01:38:48.520 --> 01:38:52.520]  But now that the court said they're operating illegally, that's a whole different issue.
[01:38:52.520 --> 01:39:00.520]  But because the city would have to be the one responsible ultimately for taking away their license to operate if they're convicted,
[01:39:00.520 --> 01:39:05.520]  the city isn't going to be the one to bring it up.
[01:39:05.520 --> 01:39:06.520]  Okay.
[01:39:06.520 --> 01:39:15.520]  I'm going to get back in touch with that woman and let her know that she's been going off of my queue because she was not aware of the law that I was passed in 2016.
[01:39:15.520 --> 01:39:22.520]  So she's been trying to get educated from the BACP, which is the one who filed this, found them guilty, administrative courts.
[01:39:22.520 --> 01:39:30.520]  And then I've been trying to educate the cops in both of those wards so I could get some help.
[01:39:30.520 --> 01:39:35.520]  You're not a high priority, but you can file criminal charges and they don't have to act on them.
[01:39:35.520 --> 01:39:41.520]  You can simply file the criminal charges and use those in your lawsuit.
[01:39:41.520 --> 01:39:44.520]  Okay.
[01:39:44.520 --> 01:39:45.520]  I will do that.
[01:39:45.520 --> 01:39:51.520]  And do you think I'm up against the statute of limitations on that possible?
[01:39:51.520 --> 01:39:52.520]  I don't know.
[01:39:52.520 --> 01:39:53.520]  I don't know what the statute.
[01:39:53.520 --> 01:39:56.520]  Each one of these could have a different statute of limitations period for it.
[01:39:56.520 --> 01:39:59.520]  So there's no way I can tell you that.
[01:39:59.520 --> 01:40:00.520]  Okay.
[01:40:00.520 --> 01:40:01.520]  I'll look into it.
[01:40:01.520 --> 01:40:02.520]  It's two years.
[01:40:02.520 --> 01:40:04.520]  It's three years for the actual act of fraud.
[01:40:04.520 --> 01:40:13.520]  Well, fraud has no statute of limitations because fraud only has three years from the date you first discovered that it's fraud.
[01:40:13.520 --> 01:40:20.520]  Up until then, there is no ticking clock.
[01:40:20.520 --> 01:40:29.520]  So if someone committed fraud against you 10 years ago and the statute of limitations on suing for the fraud is three years,
[01:40:29.520 --> 01:40:36.520]  then your three years starts from the day you discovered the fraud, not when it was perpetrated.
[01:40:36.520 --> 01:40:38.520]  Oh, okay.
[01:40:38.520 --> 01:40:40.520]  I'm getting a lot of different guy.
[01:40:40.520 --> 01:40:42.520]  I've been using some of the agencies.
[01:40:42.520 --> 01:40:45.520]  I'm getting some varied opinions and obviously they're not even up.
[01:40:45.520 --> 01:40:46.520]  Read the law yourself.
[01:40:46.520 --> 01:40:49.520]  Don't get somebody else's opinion.
[01:40:49.520 --> 01:40:53.520]  Well, I'm trying to get some legal advice from actual lawyers in that area.
[01:40:53.520 --> 01:40:57.520]  Again, don't get your advice from a lawyer.
[01:40:57.520 --> 01:40:59.520]  Go read the law.
[01:40:59.520 --> 01:41:07.520]  Most of them will tell you what they want to tell you just to get you out of their hair because they don't really want to take your case.
[01:41:07.520 --> 01:41:14.520]  They want to blow smoke and make you think you have no recourse or stop bothering us or end up money enforcing is what they're really saying.
[01:41:14.520 --> 01:41:23.520]  Yeah, and I ran into that. There's a free legal aid actually for the court systems there and then there's a lawyer who's on call who will talk to you and help you through the problem.
[01:41:23.520 --> 01:41:24.520]  Great.
[01:41:24.520 --> 01:41:36.520]  Then go to him and say, I want to file criminal charges for all of these things against the tow truck driver and the tow truck company owner, criminal conspiracy,
[01:41:36.520 --> 01:41:44.520]  a grand theft auto, burglary of a vehicle, destruction of private property and criminal mischief.
[01:41:44.520 --> 01:41:45.520]  Okay.
[01:41:45.520 --> 01:41:46.520]  All right.
[01:41:46.520 --> 01:41:49.520]  And he said, well, how did you reach all these conclusions?
[01:41:49.520 --> 01:41:57.520]  Well, I've got a judgment here from a court that says their actions and towing my car was illegal because the site was not properly posted.
[01:41:57.520 --> 01:42:02.520]  Therefore, their contract with the private property owner has no force and effect.
[01:42:02.520 --> 01:42:09.520]  Since it has no force and effect and they took my car without my consent and without lawful authority, that's grand theft auto.
[01:42:09.520 --> 01:42:11.520]  Is it not?
[01:42:11.520 --> 01:42:14.520]  And you just run right down the list with him on each one of those.
[01:42:14.520 --> 01:42:20.520]  Go read whatever the legal equivalent is in the penal code in Illinois.
[01:42:20.520 --> 01:42:21.520]  Okay.
[01:42:21.520 --> 01:42:26.520]  And read what is the closest one of those charges in that code to the ones I've named.
[01:42:26.520 --> 01:42:28.520]  They may be exactly the same name.
[01:42:28.520 --> 01:42:30.520]  They may be slightly different.
[01:42:30.520 --> 01:42:33.520]  But I guarantee you they'll be in there somewhere.
[01:42:33.520 --> 01:42:34.520]  Okay.
[01:42:34.520 --> 01:42:35.520]  I'll do that.
[01:42:35.520 --> 01:42:41.520]  I also have, I was going to get the attorney general involved because when I talked to one of the...
[01:42:41.520 --> 01:42:43.520]  Well, the attorney general won't help you.
[01:42:43.520 --> 01:42:53.520]  The city has the power to yank the license of the tow truck company or at least to get the state to do it if it's a state licensed entity.
[01:42:53.520 --> 01:43:00.520]  So in either case, you're going to have to go through a governmental entity to get their license revoked.
[01:43:00.520 --> 01:43:08.520]  But you can add that to your lawsuit and sue for injunctive relief and a petition to have their license revoked.
[01:43:08.520 --> 01:43:09.520]  Okay.
[01:43:09.520 --> 01:43:11.520]  Would it help me...
[01:43:11.520 --> 01:43:15.520]  I rolled the dice with this BHTP investigation and it worked out well.
[01:43:15.520 --> 01:43:23.520]  But would it help me to also get another similar ruling, not necessarily in my favor because attorney general is not going to fight for me essentially.
[01:43:23.520 --> 01:43:25.520]  I know I have to fight for myself.
[01:43:25.520 --> 01:43:32.520]  But because they're still breaking the law, because I know these laws really well now, and I know what they're supposed to be doing behind the scenes,
[01:43:32.520 --> 01:43:35.520]  if I can get the attorney general to actually do a thorough investigation...
[01:43:35.520 --> 01:43:39.520]  You would have to go through a state representative to get the attorney general to do anything.
[01:43:39.520 --> 01:43:43.520]  And the only thing the attorney general will do is write an opinion about it.
[01:43:43.520 --> 01:43:44.520]  That's all.
[01:43:44.520 --> 01:43:50.520]  He cannot act against a private entity unless they've committed fraud against the state.
[01:43:50.520 --> 01:43:53.520]  Hang on just a second, and I'll wrap this up with you on the other side.
[01:43:53.520 --> 01:43:56.520]  All right, folks, we're coming up on the last segment, so y'all hang on.
[01:43:56.520 --> 01:43:57.520]  Robert, you as well.
[01:43:57.520 --> 01:43:59.520]  I'll get to you as quick as I can.
[01:43:59.520 --> 01:44:05.520]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:05.520 --> 01:44:08.520]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[01:44:08.520 --> 01:44:10.520]  And it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:10.520 --> 01:44:16.520]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:16.520 --> 01:44:21.520]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[01:44:21.520 --> 01:44:24.520]  young jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:24.520 --> 01:44:30.520]  Logo's radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:30.520 --> 01:44:33.520]  We have come to trust young jevity so much.
[01:44:33.520 --> 01:44:39.520]  We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:39.520 --> 01:44:47.520]  When you order from Logo's radio network dot com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.520 --> 01:44:51.520]  As you realize the benefits of young jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:51.520 --> 01:44:58.520]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:44:58.520 --> 01:45:00.520]  Order now.
[01:45:00.520 --> 01:45:03.520]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.520 --> 01:45:10.520]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:10.520 --> 01:45:14.520]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.520 --> 01:45:18.520]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.520 --> 01:45:22.520]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.520 --> 01:45:27.520]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.520 --> 01:45:34.520]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.520 --> 01:45:43.520]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.520 --> 01:45:52.520]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.520 --> 01:46:01.520]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:22.520 --> 01:46:32.520]  All right, folks, we are back. We are now in the last segment of the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show,
[01:46:32.520 --> 01:46:36.520]  and we are going to wrap this up with Chris in Colorado.
[01:46:36.520 --> 01:46:40.520]  All right, Chris, hang on just a second.
[01:46:40.520 --> 01:46:46.520]  This dad-blame thing has done log me out again. I don't know why.
[01:46:46.520 --> 01:46:57.520]  I hate one thing, it's another with this.
[01:46:57.520 --> 01:47:00.520]  All right. Are you there, Chris?
[01:47:00.520 --> 01:47:01.520]  I'm here, yeah.
[01:47:01.520 --> 01:47:02.520]  Okay.
[01:47:02.520 --> 01:47:06.520]  So last thing about the attorney general, they have a lot of sub offices all over.
[01:47:06.520 --> 01:47:07.520]  That's where I talked to.
[01:47:07.520 --> 01:47:11.520]  It was like an assistant when she was interested in trying to help if I can get her enough information.
[01:47:11.520 --> 01:47:16.520]  Anyway, in my view, they are actually going after the state that are in violation at the state
[01:47:16.520 --> 01:47:18.520]  because they're still breaking the law within the city,
[01:47:18.520 --> 01:47:21.520]  and they're just basically waiting for someone to sue them and put them out of business.
[01:47:21.520 --> 01:47:26.520]  Well, if what they're required to do is based upon a state law, then the attorney general can act.
[01:47:26.520 --> 01:47:32.520]  But if they're doing it based upon a local ordinance, that would be a different story.
[01:47:32.520 --> 01:47:40.520]  So if they operate under state law, then you're right. They can help you.
[01:47:40.520 --> 01:47:45.520]  All right. She talked. I'll get back in touch with her. I'll feel that out. I'll see how that goes.
[01:47:45.520 --> 01:47:46.520]  Okay.
[01:47:46.520 --> 01:47:49.520]  It's interesting that, you know, Illinois is just a corrupt, corrupt place,
[01:47:49.520 --> 01:47:51.520]  and they left these laws, and I'm starting to learn this,
[01:47:51.520 --> 01:47:55.520]  and that's why there's a lot of remnants of the whole mob and all that, you know, all that kind of thing.
[01:47:55.520 --> 01:47:59.520]  But the laws are written in a way that they're vague enough that people know how to skate through them,
[01:47:59.520 --> 01:48:03.520]  and that's what I found in Towing, and that's why that alderman changed them within the city
[01:48:03.520 --> 01:48:05.520]  so they could no longer skate through them.
[01:48:05.520 --> 01:48:11.520]  But I'm literally the only one since 2016 that's pushed it this far to educate all the agencies,
[01:48:11.520 --> 01:48:13.520]  and they're all like, I didn't know anything about this.
[01:48:13.520 --> 01:48:21.520]  So it's a huge amount of work that I've done, but I guess you give me some more fire with that whole criminal complaint.
[01:48:21.520 --> 01:48:26.520]  That's going to be fun. So I'll go do it.
[01:48:26.520 --> 01:48:28.520]  Well, I wish you luck with it, man.
[01:48:28.520 --> 01:48:34.520]  Hang in there, and like I say, just use those penal statutes because they're there for a reason,
[01:48:34.520 --> 01:48:38.520]  and they can be applied to someone who's just willing to do it.
[01:48:38.520 --> 01:48:42.520]  Yeah. All right, I'll get on it. Thank you again, my friend. Appreciate your time.
[01:48:42.520 --> 01:48:44.520]  You're welcome. Good luck.
[01:48:44.520 --> 01:48:45.520]  Okay.
[01:48:45.520 --> 01:48:51.520]  All right. Now we have Robert in California. Robert, what do you got?
[01:48:51.520 --> 01:48:52.520]  How you doing, Ed?
[01:48:52.520 --> 01:48:53.520]  So far so grand.
[01:48:53.520 --> 01:48:56.520]  I just want you to touch on, go ahead.
[01:48:56.520 --> 01:48:59.520]  I just answered your question. Go ahead.
[01:48:59.520 --> 01:49:08.520]  Okay. The anti-corruption oaths that you talked about in a few times,
[01:49:08.520 --> 01:49:15.520]  how do you go about finding out about an anti-corruption oath?
[01:49:15.520 --> 01:49:19.520]  Well, I don't know what you mean by an anti-corruption oath.
[01:49:19.520 --> 01:49:31.520]  Every elected official has an oath of office, and taking of the oath of office implies that you will act properly
[01:49:31.520 --> 01:49:40.520]  and morally under the laws of the state and the state constitution to uphold the laws and do your duty in that office.
[01:49:40.520 --> 01:49:47.520]  I don't know of any oath that you must explicitly take that says, I promise not to be corrupt.
[01:49:47.520 --> 01:49:59.520]  Okay. I must have misunderstood then on one of your shows a while back where a temporary judge had to take an anti-corruption oath.
[01:49:59.520 --> 01:50:18.520]  You know, a temporary judge has to retake his oath of office every time he takes the bench, and temporary judges are also called visiting judges, but under Texas law, and I don't know about any other state, but in Texas,
[01:50:18.520 --> 01:50:35.520]  the statutes are written that says that every time that judge assumes the duties in a visiting position, he has to take the oath of office, especially if he's one that's been retired.
[01:50:35.520 --> 01:50:50.520]  Okay. I'll look in the judicial counsel's rulebook. It won't be in the rulebook. It'll be under the state law dealing with judges and what their authority is, and et cetera, et cetera.
[01:50:50.520 --> 01:51:00.520]  Check the government code, whatever that may be in your state. Check your code of criminal procedure, and so on and so forth.
[01:51:00.520 --> 01:51:07.520]  Any areas that deal with things that judges do is where you might find it. Here it's in the government code.
[01:51:07.520 --> 01:51:26.520]  Okay. Then I wanted to ask you about a bailiff's actions. I was in court and while I was, you know, talking to the judge, the bailiff blindsided me from three o'clock and served me the complaint,
[01:51:26.520 --> 01:51:40.520]  which up till then I had never been served a complaint, but they use the bailiff to serve me the complaint. Is there, do they call that anything besides underhanded?
[01:51:40.520 --> 01:51:43.520]  Say that one more time.
[01:51:43.520 --> 01:52:01.520]  The bailiff approached me while I was talking to the judge at 10 o'clock. I was looking at the judge at 10 o'clock and the bailiff came up at three o'clock and interrupted me, took me completely out of what was going on and a judge from there just ran with it.
[01:52:01.520 --> 01:52:05.520]  It was like it was a setup.
[01:52:05.520 --> 01:52:08.520]  What did they do?
[01:52:08.520 --> 01:52:24.520]  Well, while the bailiff is talking to me, he denied a couple of motions that I had in and when I questioned it, he told me you're through here for today, you're through here for today, you are through here for today.
[01:52:24.520 --> 01:52:29.520]  Okay. Well, here's the thing. Was the prosecutor present when you were trying to question the judge about this?
[01:52:29.520 --> 01:52:31.520]  Yes.
[01:52:31.520 --> 01:52:33.520]  The prosecutor was there?
[01:52:33.520 --> 01:52:34.520]  Yes.
[01:52:34.520 --> 01:52:40.520]  All right. And then the bailiff escorted you out of the room because the judge said you're through.
[01:52:40.520 --> 01:52:49.520]  No, no, he just said you're through and I questioned that. I said, hey, I have another case. He said, I said you're through here for today.
[01:52:49.520 --> 01:52:57.520]  He never, I had two different cases. He never read which case he was talking to me about in the first place.
[01:52:57.520 --> 01:53:04.520]  I said, I've got some of these motions here. I want to go through. He says, I'm going to deny this one and a doc, deny this one.
[01:53:04.520 --> 01:53:11.520]  And when I questioned it, he said you're through here for today.
[01:53:11.520 --> 01:53:15.520]  Okay. So what exactly is your question?
[01:53:15.520 --> 01:53:21.520]  Well, is that maneuver that they pulled with the bailiff? Is that something that they...
[01:53:21.520 --> 01:53:27.520]  What is there to do the judge is bidding when the judge tells them to do something, they're going to do it.
[01:53:27.520 --> 01:53:33.520]  And so when the judge basically says you're through here, that's a signal to the bailiff of getting him out of my courtroom.
[01:53:33.520 --> 01:53:40.520]  What I'm talking about is weird that when the bailiff, while I'm talking to the judge, the bailiff blindsided me and started...
[01:53:40.520 --> 01:53:45.520]  He said, these are yours and he's serving me to complain.
[01:53:45.520 --> 01:53:50.520]  And so he took me away from what the judge was saying almost deliberately.
[01:53:50.520 --> 01:53:57.520]  Then when I got back to what the judge was saying, tried to object, he said you're through here for today.
[01:53:57.520 --> 01:54:02.520]  And that was it. He wouldn't hear anymore that I had to say.
[01:54:02.520 --> 01:54:10.520]  Okay. I still don't hear a question. I hear you telling me what happened, but I don't hear your question.
[01:54:10.520 --> 01:54:13.520]  Is your question is what the bailiff did proper?
[01:54:13.520 --> 01:54:24.520]  My answer is he took his cue from the judge to remove you from the courtroom because the judge was telling him to do that without using the exact words.
[01:54:24.520 --> 01:54:27.520]  No, that isn't what I was trying to get at.
[01:54:27.520 --> 01:54:29.520]  Then what are you trying to get at?
[01:54:29.520 --> 01:54:41.520]  The fact that the bailiff did that, from what I've read about the bailiff's duties is he was out of line by interfering with the procedure.
[01:54:41.520 --> 01:54:45.520]  Not when the judge has already said, you're done.
[01:54:45.520 --> 01:54:50.520]  That's the end of the procedure for that particular hearing.
[01:54:50.520 --> 01:55:00.520]  I get it back up to when the judge and I are talking, and of course everyone's got masks on and you can't hear what they're saying.
[01:55:00.520 --> 01:55:07.520]  And while I'm talking to the judge, the bailiff comes up and serves me to complain.
[01:55:07.520 --> 01:55:12.520]  Instead of doing it before the thing started.
[01:55:12.520 --> 01:55:23.520]  Okay. Again, what do the rules of procedures say the service of the complaint must be done in what manner, by who?
[01:55:23.520 --> 01:55:29.520]  Again, what are the rules of procedures that control what the judge can and cannot do in a court?
[01:55:29.520 --> 01:55:33.520]  For instance, he denies your motions based upon what legal grounds.
[01:55:33.520 --> 01:55:38.520]  You object to the denial of the motions and use that specific legal term objection, judge.
[01:55:38.520 --> 01:55:43.520]  I'd please like for you to state the legal basis for your denial of the motion.
[01:55:43.520 --> 01:55:45.520]  Was this a motion's hearing?
[01:55:45.520 --> 01:55:50.520]  If it was a motion's hearing, why weren't you allowed to say anything in relation to what was in the motions?
[01:55:50.520 --> 01:55:52.520]  Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:55:52.520 --> 01:55:55.520]  You're giving me a story with no context.
[01:55:55.520 --> 01:56:04.520]  I can't tell you whether or not you were prohibited in the process because I don't know what the process is where you are for what you were doing.
[01:56:04.520 --> 01:56:08.520]  And I'm betting from the way you're talking, you don't either.
[01:56:08.520 --> 01:56:12.520]  Pretty much. I'm trying to figure it out.
[01:56:12.520 --> 01:56:22.520]  Well, there's a book called Rules of Procedure, either civil, criminal, or administrative, depending upon which jurisdiction you're operating in, that you need to read.
[01:56:22.520 --> 01:56:24.520]  Alright, I'll do it.
[01:56:24.520 --> 01:56:27.520]  Okay, then there's Rules of Evidence.
[01:56:27.520 --> 01:56:33.520]  Then there's also, you know, the particular law involved in whatever the case is you're fighting.
[01:56:33.520 --> 01:56:35.520]  Those are things you have to read.
[01:56:35.520 --> 01:56:36.520]  You have to know.
[01:56:36.520 --> 01:56:45.520]  If you go in there blind, why would you expect not to get run over for crossing the street and not seeing the cars coming?
[01:56:45.520 --> 01:56:49.520]  Okay, I can take that.
[01:56:49.520 --> 01:57:01.520]  One of the, I wanted to tell you, one of the motions that I put in was say it was in your, it was a demand for beneficios.
[01:57:01.520 --> 01:57:03.520]  A demand for what?
[01:57:03.520 --> 01:57:05.520]  Bonafides?
[01:57:05.520 --> 01:57:07.520]  Yeah, bonafides.
[01:57:07.520 --> 01:57:08.520]  Okay.
[01:57:08.520 --> 01:57:10.520]  They did not like that.
[01:57:10.520 --> 01:57:14.520]  He told me I had no right to those oaths.
[01:57:14.520 --> 01:57:19.520]  Yeah, you do because the state constitution says they have to have them and they have to have them on file.
[01:57:19.520 --> 01:57:21.520]  That makes them public information.
[01:57:21.520 --> 01:57:23.520]  You have an absolute right to them.
[01:57:23.520 --> 01:57:27.520]  The problem is you're asking about them from the wrong person.
[01:57:27.520 --> 01:57:31.520]  You're asking for the person who is not the custodian of those records.
[01:57:31.520 --> 01:57:41.520]  That would be either the county clerk or some other clerk that is given the responsibility under law to maintain those oaths and those documents.
[01:57:41.520 --> 01:57:43.520]  They're the ones you have to get them from.
[01:57:43.520 --> 01:57:46.520]  Not the judge.
[01:57:46.520 --> 01:57:49.520]  Okay.
[01:57:49.520 --> 01:57:50.520]  I've done that.
[01:57:50.520 --> 01:57:52.520]  I've went to the secretary of state.
[01:57:52.520 --> 01:57:55.520]  Secretary of state may not be the one either.
[01:57:55.520 --> 01:57:59.520]  If this is a local judge, then it's probably going to be either your county clerk or your district clerk.
[01:57:59.520 --> 01:58:02.520]  Not your state anything.
[01:58:02.520 --> 01:58:04.520]  The state has them.
[01:58:04.520 --> 01:58:10.520]  If they're a district court, the state would probably be the one that has them or higher than the district court.
[01:58:10.520 --> 01:58:13.520]  All right, Robert, I'm sorry, man, but I'm out of time here.
[01:58:13.520 --> 01:58:15.520]  You hear the music? I gots to go.
[01:58:15.520 --> 01:58:17.520]  All right, folks, I want to thank all the callers that called in.
[01:58:17.520 --> 01:58:20.520]  I want to thank all the listeners out there in Radio Land.
[01:58:20.520 --> 01:58:21.520]  We appreciate you.
[01:58:21.520 --> 01:58:30.520]  Please keep us supported financially and with your prayers and anything else you can send our way because Lord knows we need them just like everybody else.
[01:58:30.520 --> 01:58:32.520]  So folks, y'all have a great week.
[01:58:32.520 --> 01:58:50.520]  Good night and God bless.
[01:58:50.520 --> 01:58:57.520]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.520 --> 01:59:08.520]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.520 --> 01:59:11.520]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.520 --> 01:59:20.520]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.520 --> 01:59:29.520]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.520 --> 01:59:32.520]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.520 --> 01:59:40.520]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.520 --> 01:59:50.520]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.