[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  The following news flashes brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[00:07.000 --> 00:13.440]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429 an ounce,
[00:13.440 --> 00:21.640]  Silver $16.45 an ounce, Copper $2.75 an ounce, Oil, Texas Crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent Crude
[00:21.640 --> 00:29.920]  $62.47 a barrel, and Cryptos in order of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum
[00:29.920 --> 00:41.760]  $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[00:41.760 --> 00:52.680]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a timed suitcase bomb, was detonated
[00:52.680 --> 00:58.000]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing
[00:58.000 --> 01:05.000]  10 and injuring 40.
[01:05.000 --> 01:06.000]  And recent news.
[01:06.000 --> 01:10.680]  Since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing heaven attacks his law back
[01:10.680 --> 01:15.240]  in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin and San Antonio
[01:15.240 --> 01:19.360]  have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they
[01:19.360 --> 01:23.440]  are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the
[01:23.440 --> 01:28.160]  herb for THC. Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this
[01:28.160 --> 01:33.120]  month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of
[01:33.120 --> 01:34.120]  the law.
[01:34.120 --> 01:37.800]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[01:37.800 --> 01:42.320]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.320 --> 01:48.480]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.480 --> 01:54.760]  well as other cities too like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.760 --> 01:59.240]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:59.240 --> 02:02.080]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:02.080 --> 02:07.040]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:07.040 --> 02:11.040]  in Harris County who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:11.040 --> 02:13.720]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.720 --> 02:17.640]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.640 --> 02:22.840]  charged with.
[02:22.840 --> 02:27.480]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark
[02:27.480 --> 02:32.600]  as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.600 --> 02:38.240]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.240 --> 02:39.720]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.720 --> 02:44.040]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:44.040 --> 02:50.320]  its front fins for the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.320 --> 03:16.280]  clove.
[03:16.280 --> 03:33.280]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you, bad
[03:33.280 --> 03:39.280]  boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you, when you
[03:39.280 --> 03:44.280]  were eight and you had bad grades, you go to school and learn the golden rules, so why
[03:44.280 --> 03:50.280]  are you acting like a bloody fool, it's your good thing and you're just too bad for it,
[03:50.280 --> 03:51.280]  bad boys, bad boys, bad boys, bad boys, bad boys, bad boys, bad boys, bad boys, bad boys,
[03:51.280 --> 03:58.280]  okay, howdy, howdy, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rue Le Blanc Radio on this Thursday, the 13th
[03:58.280 --> 04:10.280]  day of February 2020 and I'm gonna open all the phone lines, phone lines are officially
[04:10.280 --> 04:18.280]  open, we'll have them open all night, our call in number 512-646-1984, so if you have
[04:18.280 --> 04:25.280]  a question or comment, give us a call, I'm gonna start out with something I think I figured
[04:25.280 --> 04:36.280]  out, I've been working on this issue of mass incarceration, how did we wind up with so
[04:36.280 --> 04:44.280]  many people in jail, Texas is the second largest state in the union but it has the highest
[04:44.280 --> 04:57.280]  number of people in prison of any state in the union, Texas has 29 million people and California
[04:57.280 --> 05:12.280]  is the largest, has 39 million people and Texas houses 218,500 people while California
[05:12.280 --> 05:21.280]  houses 202, well in both instances, that is a horribly exorbitant amount.
[05:21.280 --> 05:28.280]  So I got a little lost in those numbers, did you, I mean it sounds like a lot of high
[05:28.280 --> 05:33.280]  numbers but are you saying Texas has the highest per capita?
[05:33.280 --> 05:41.280]  Yes, per capita of the United States, in 19, well if you look at the incarceration rate
[05:41.280 --> 05:51.280]  on average, up until 1974 and as far back as you take the graph, it's fairly consistent,
[05:51.280 --> 05:56.280]  it varies up and down a little bit year to year but it varies around the point, I don't
[05:56.280 --> 06:03.280]  remember exactly what that number was, but in 1973 it dropped down and then it rose up
[06:03.280 --> 06:12.280]  in 1974 like it had been doing for the last 20 years but when it got to the mean amount
[06:12.280 --> 06:19.280]  it kept going up and went straight up off the chart.
[06:19.280 --> 06:23.280]  So what happened in 1974?
[06:23.280 --> 06:36.280]  Well in 1970 Nixon filed the control substances act and started this war on drugs but that
[06:36.280 --> 06:47.280]  was 1970, not 1974 and in researching what I believe is causing this mass incarceration
[06:47.280 --> 06:53.280]  problem, it appears to come down to speedy trial.
[06:53.280 --> 07:06.280]  The counties in the state of Texas, 70% of all of the people in county jail are there
[07:06.280 --> 07:15.280]  on pretrial issues, they've never been convicted of a crime but they're being held pretrial,
[07:15.280 --> 07:24.280]  because that happened, 70% can only happen if we have no speedy trial.
[07:24.280 --> 07:31.280]  Our founders knew what they were doing when they put in a right to speedy trial.
[07:31.280 --> 07:39.280]  They had lived under a system where you could be put in jail and held as long as the system
[07:39.280 --> 07:44.280]  chose and that's exactly what is happening now.
[07:44.280 --> 07:52.280]  70% that costs the state of Texas $900 million a year.
[07:52.280 --> 07:59.280]  The prosecutor, you know we talk to people and they feel like the prosecutor's out to get them,
[07:59.280 --> 08:07.280]  well the prosecutor doesn't have time to be out to get you because he's got too many cases on his desk.
[08:07.280 --> 08:12.280]  He's more interested in clearing his docket than anything else.
[08:12.280 --> 08:17.280]  And it is clear that he's not getting it cleared because he has so many people sitting in jail
[08:17.280 --> 08:20.280]  waiting for the docket to be cleared.
[08:20.280 --> 08:29.280]  So prosecutors, if someone gets arrested and they can't make bail and the prosecutor offers them a deal
[08:29.280 --> 08:35.280]  and they don't take the deal, well they can just stay in jail.
[08:35.280 --> 08:44.280]  And the prosecutor can keep them there essentially as long as he chooses because there is no more speedy trial act.
[08:44.280 --> 08:53.280]  Well we still have the right but our legislators I guess based on special interest influence
[08:53.280 --> 09:01.280]  have written the laws so that while you can say you have the right you cannot enforce it.
[09:01.280 --> 09:07.280]  So the prosecutor can leave you sitting in jail until you make a deal with him.
[09:07.280 --> 09:15.280]  He can cost you your home, your automobile, your family, everything.
[09:15.280 --> 09:22.280]  And he can hold you there and cost you everything you've got until you make a deal
[09:22.280 --> 09:25.280]  and it would seem the ones that are most certain that they're innocent
[09:25.280 --> 09:30.280]  is the ones that would hold out the longest and those are the ones that will be hurt the worst.
[09:30.280 --> 09:34.280]  And then when they get out of jail they have nothing.
[09:34.280 --> 09:41.280]  Absolutely nothing, no job, no home, no furniture to put in a home if they had it
[09:41.280 --> 09:49.280]  because they've lost all of that, no automobile, how do they redeem themselves?
[09:49.280 --> 09:53.280]  Well crime that they learned from the other guys in jail.
[09:53.280 --> 09:57.280]  We are creating this horrible mess for ourselves
[09:57.280 --> 10:01.280]  and as far as I can tell nobody did it on purpose.
[10:01.280 --> 10:10.280]  Prosecutors in an attempt to clear their docket created this mess
[10:10.280 --> 10:15.280]  and the way they were able to create it is the legislature in its wisdom
[10:15.280 --> 10:25.280]  decided that since we have learned counsel in public employ in the form of professional prosecutors
[10:25.280 --> 10:34.280]  we may as well use that learning counsel to give advice to the police in the lower courts.
[10:34.280 --> 10:38.280]  Really, really bad idea.
[10:38.280 --> 10:45.280]  That is a prescription for the catastrophe we now suffered with.
[10:45.280 --> 10:53.280]  Would you really expect a prosecutor to advise the police in lower courts
[10:53.280 --> 10:59.280]  to conduct their business in such a way so as to make his life a living hell?
[10:59.280 --> 11:07.280]  Or is he likely to advise them in practices and procedures that will ease the prosecutorial burden?
[11:07.280 --> 11:11.280]  That is exactly what has happened.
[11:11.280 --> 11:15.280]  And I'm working out a remedy.
[11:15.280 --> 11:23.280]  I've been all this time you've listened to me on the radio complaining that the major problem out there with the system
[11:23.280 --> 11:27.280]  is the lack of a examining trial.
[11:27.280 --> 11:30.280]  Well I'm not sure if that's actually the case.
[11:30.280 --> 11:33.280]  I think it may actually be.
[11:33.280 --> 11:37.280]  It's a pretty trial, but how do we fix that?
[11:37.280 --> 11:39.280]  Well it got a way to fix it.
[11:39.280 --> 11:46.280]  The county's commissioners court are the ones that pay the bill for the county.
[11:46.280 --> 11:54.280]  And they are paying $900 million a year for pre-trial detainees.
[11:54.280 --> 11:59.280]  I'm going to suggest that we go to the county commissioners court
[11:59.280 --> 12:11.280]  and ask the county commissioners court to pay lawyers who represent clients accused of crime.
[12:11.280 --> 12:24.280]  And that we pay them based on the amount of time they save the county for pre-trial incarceration.
[12:24.280 --> 12:29.280]  If a lawyer gets a client and the client can't make bail,
[12:29.280 --> 12:40.280]  then if the lawyer can take, we can calculate an average time a person sits in jail who can't make bail
[12:40.280 --> 12:43.280]  and put that as a benchmark.
[12:43.280 --> 12:50.280]  So we have the prosecutor push for a, I mean we have the defense counsel push for a bail reduction hearing.
[12:50.280 --> 12:58.280]  In the last show Brett brought up 17, a code of criminal procedure 17.151.
[12:58.280 --> 13:05.280]  And that set limits, but apparently in 2005 it was repealed, so there are no limits.
[13:05.280 --> 13:06.280]  So we go back.
[13:06.280 --> 13:08.280]  Well actually I was just looking at that.
[13:08.280 --> 13:13.280]  Part of it got repealed, but there's still teeth in there for us.
[13:13.280 --> 13:15.280]  The part that got repealed was a section three.
[13:15.280 --> 13:18.280]  I was just looking at that.
[13:18.280 --> 13:21.280]  Oh good, so it's not all repealed.
[13:21.280 --> 13:22.280]  Right.
[13:22.280 --> 13:23.280]  Wonderful.
[13:23.280 --> 13:24.280]  Then we can use that.
[13:24.280 --> 13:26.280]  Then lawyers can use that.
[13:26.280 --> 13:31.280]  Lawyers aren't doing their job because they have no incentive.
[13:31.280 --> 13:37.280]  If you're a court appointed counsel, you're going to get, for a misdemeanor, you're going to get about 200 bucks.
[13:37.280 --> 13:43.280]  If you just let the person sit in jail until they make a deal, you get 200 bucks.
[13:43.280 --> 13:47.280]  If you fight like crazy, you get 200 bucks.
[13:47.280 --> 13:50.280]  So what would you do?
[13:50.280 --> 13:51.280]  You're in business.
[13:51.280 --> 13:52.280]  You're in business to make money.
[13:52.280 --> 13:55.280]  You're going to spend your time where the money is.
[13:55.280 --> 14:02.280]  Sure you can consider yourself to be Perry Mason and take on these wrongful issues.
[14:02.280 --> 14:06.280]  We do that for a little while until you're out of business.
[14:06.280 --> 14:09.280]  You run the business here to make money.
[14:09.280 --> 14:20.280]  No, let's go to the commissioner's court and ask the commissioner's court to pay lawyers a portion of what the lawyer saves them.
[14:20.280 --> 14:27.280]  It costs $59 a day to keep a person in a Texas county jail.
[14:27.280 --> 14:36.280]  So if a lawyer gets a client, the prosecutor's offered him a year in prison for what he's charged with.
[14:36.280 --> 14:45.280]  If the lawyer can negotiate six months in prison, he's just saved the state of Texas $10,000.
[14:45.280 --> 14:54.280]  So giving him $1,000 to get that done is a no-brainer.
[14:54.280 --> 14:56.280]  So we get the county commissioner's court.
[14:56.280 --> 15:00.280]  The county commissioner's court doesn't need anybody's permission.
[15:00.280 --> 15:02.280]  They can pay this if they want to.
[15:02.280 --> 15:05.280]  It has nothing to do with the courts themselves.
[15:05.280 --> 15:09.280]  They can pay this in order to lower their incarceration rate.
[15:09.280 --> 15:12.280]  What do you think for that?
[15:12.280 --> 15:19.280]  I think that would be a great step in the right direction of all the protections that the law already affords us.
[15:19.280 --> 15:23.280]  But they're kind of just side-stepping all of that.
[15:23.280 --> 15:26.280]  Everything that's toward the presumption of innocence.
[15:26.280 --> 15:30.280]  And lawyers have no incentive.
[15:30.280 --> 15:33.280]  So let's give them incentive.
[15:33.280 --> 15:37.280]  If lawyers see they're all about money, let's give them a way to make more money.
[15:37.280 --> 15:45.280]  And also they're going to propose that they make my questionnaire available to people who have been arrested
[15:45.280 --> 15:47.280]  and request court appointed counsel.
[15:47.280 --> 15:51.280]  80% of the people who are arrested request court appointed counsel.
[15:51.280 --> 15:55.280]  60% actually to get court appointed counsel.
[15:55.280 --> 16:00.280]  So we prepare a questionnaire and make that available to them
[16:00.280 --> 16:05.280]  so they can see why it's a good idea to hire their own attorney.
[16:05.280 --> 16:09.280]  Remember on my show somebody called in, my brother got his third DUI.
[16:09.280 --> 16:10.280]  What should I do?
[16:10.280 --> 16:12.280]  Get a lawyer.
[16:12.280 --> 16:14.280]  Oh, but he can't afford a lawyer.
[16:14.280 --> 16:17.280]  Does he have a flat screen TV or a pickup truck?
[16:17.280 --> 16:19.280]  Time to sell that booze.
[16:19.280 --> 16:21.280]  Yes.
[16:21.280 --> 16:23.280]  Well, he needs it to go to work.
[16:23.280 --> 16:25.280]  Well, he won't need it to go to work.
[16:25.280 --> 16:32.280]  He's doing 25 to life for a third DUI sell to pick up, stay out of jail, buy you another pickup.
[16:32.280 --> 16:34.280]  Get your priorities straight.
[16:34.280 --> 16:36.280]  And that's what the questionnaire is for.
[16:36.280 --> 16:40.280]  To help them get their priorities straight and keep themselves out of jail.
[16:40.280 --> 16:41.280]  Hang on.
[16:41.280 --> 16:43.280]  About to go to our sponsors.
[16:43.280 --> 16:54.280]  If you find value in what we produce here, then over the intermission, check out our sponsors.
[16:54.280 --> 16:57.280]  They will help you find the kind of value we offer.
[16:57.280 --> 17:26.280]  We'll be right back.
[17:27.280 --> 17:55.280]  We'll be right back.
[17:55.280 --> 18:00.280]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:26.280 --> 18:35.280]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[18:35.280 --> 18:41.280]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week.
[18:41.280 --> 18:48.280]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character development.
[18:48.280 --> 19:00.280]  So mark your calendar and join us live on logosradionetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8 for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[19:00.280 --> 19:21.280]  You are listening to the logosradionetwork.com.
[19:21.280 --> 19:31.280]  Okay, we are back.
[19:31.280 --> 19:36.280]  Brett's here to straighten me out when I screw up.
[19:36.280 --> 19:42.280]  Will you explain about 17.151 being repealed?
[19:42.280 --> 19:51.280]  Well, it's 17.151 of code of criminal procedure.
[19:51.280 --> 20:01.280]  The part that says at the very bottom, it's kind of confusing if you just go in at the bottom, it tells you when something has been repealed, but it says section three was repealed.
[20:01.280 --> 20:04.280]  So the rest of it is still active.
[20:04.280 --> 20:15.280]  Section three, that as of 2005 is no longer with us, it was a way for a defendant to be in trouble for longer.
[20:15.280 --> 20:25.280]  Because section one, which we still have and is still great, it sets a limit of a number of days that the person is in limbo.
[20:25.280 --> 20:32.280]  Defendant is charged with different kinds of things, 90 days, 30 days, 15 and 5.
[20:32.280 --> 20:47.280]  And if you, if he is in jail in custody or if he is admitted to bail, there's a clock ticking.
[20:47.280 --> 21:00.280]  And section three, which got repealed, says that if the person is arrested and detained for a violation of the conditions of his release,
[21:00.280 --> 21:10.280]  then that clock starts over and begins to run again on the date of the arrest for violation of conditions of the release.
[21:10.280 --> 21:12.280]  So we no longer have that.
[21:12.280 --> 21:16.280]  It's just from day one and that's it.
[21:16.280 --> 21:28.280]  So it used to be that if you were arrested and held for five days and you get out on a PR bond and you violate the PR bond,
[21:28.280 --> 21:31.280]  you come back, the clock starts all over again.
[21:31.280 --> 21:32.280]  Right.
[21:32.280 --> 21:33.280]  They took that out.
[21:33.280 --> 21:41.280]  Now if you violate a condition of the PR bond and come back, you start counting from day five and move forward from there.
[21:41.280 --> 21:42.280]  Yes.
[21:42.280 --> 21:44.280]  That makes it better for us.
[21:44.280 --> 21:45.280]  A better for the defendant.
[21:45.280 --> 21:46.280]  A better for the remedy.
[21:46.280 --> 21:47.280]  Yes.
[21:47.280 --> 21:48.280]  Good.
[21:48.280 --> 21:53.280]  So will you read section one?
[21:53.280 --> 22:00.280]  Article 17.151, release because of delay.
[22:00.280 --> 22:20.280]  Section one, a defendant who is detained in jail, pending trial of an accusation against him, must be released either on personal bond or by reducing the amount of bail required if the state is not ready for trial of the criminal action for which he is being detained.
[22:20.280 --> 22:42.280]  Within, now this is how long the state has to be ready for trial, within 90 days from the commencement of detention if he's accused of a felony, 30 days if he's accused of a misdemeanor punishable by jail for more than 180 days,
[22:42.280 --> 22:59.280]  15 days if he's accused of a misdemeanor with a sentence of imprisonment for 180 days or less, five days if he's accused of a misdemeanor punishable by fine only.
[22:59.280 --> 23:08.280]  So if they've got you in jail for five days and they're not ready for a trial, you walk.
[23:08.280 --> 23:15.280]  30 days for class B, 60 days for class A.
[23:15.280 --> 23:16.280]  It's 15.
[23:16.280 --> 23:17.280]  Oh, I'm sorry.
[23:17.280 --> 23:18.280]  15 for class B.
[23:18.280 --> 23:22.280]  From five, 15, 30, 90.
[23:22.280 --> 23:23.280]  Yeah.
[23:23.280 --> 23:28.280]  15 class B, 30 class A, 90 for a felony.
[23:28.280 --> 23:29.280]  Yes.
[23:29.280 --> 23:41.280]  With just that, we can pretty well clear out this 70% of the population in the county jails.
[23:41.280 --> 23:42.280]  Right.
[23:42.280 --> 23:54.280]  Instead of the lawyer going down there and filing a motion for continuance, which they seem to love to do, instead of that, they can file a motion to get this guy out of here.
[23:54.280 --> 23:59.280]  And then he gets paid by the time he saves the county.
[23:59.280 --> 24:00.280]  Sounds great.
[24:00.280 --> 24:03.280]  Sounds right.
[24:03.280 --> 24:05.280]  I think this will work.
[24:05.280 --> 24:13.280]  And it's the kind of thing that is pretty easy for a bean counter to wrap his head around.
[24:13.280 --> 24:14.280]  Excuse me.
[24:14.280 --> 24:19.280]  The numbers are pretty straightforward.
[24:19.280 --> 24:26.280]  Now, keep in mind, this is getting the person out on a PR bond or reducing the bail so that they can pay.
[24:26.280 --> 24:34.280]  This is not a dismissal or a complete discharge or they don't need to come back.
[24:34.280 --> 24:37.280]  This is just to get them out of the jail system.
[24:37.280 --> 24:50.280]  Now, what you were talking about last week, 3201 is where I see an even more exciting value is it's over.
[24:50.280 --> 24:53.280]  If they take too long, it's over.
[24:53.280 --> 25:13.280]  And that was the reason 3202 a was originally overturned as unconstitutional because instead of saying that you have a right to dismissal, it said that the case shall be dismissed.
[25:13.280 --> 25:23.280]  And the Supreme Court ruled that the legislature had no power to dictate a judicial determination.
[25:23.280 --> 25:25.280]  And they overturned it for that.
[25:25.280 --> 25:30.280]  Now, that would have been really, really easy to fix.
[25:30.280 --> 25:32.280]  But they didn't.
[25:32.280 --> 25:55.280]  So that if you're over, if you're held an extended period of time and the prosecuting attorney cannot show reasonable cause for holding you in that period of time, then doesn't really say what a problem is.
[25:55.280 --> 26:00.280]  I'll have to go back and reread it, but it was just that nothing.
[26:00.280 --> 26:03.280]  You might want to see if you can get them out sooner.
[26:03.280 --> 26:06.280]  But if you don't, oh, well.
[26:06.280 --> 26:17.280]  And I suspect that is the these rented jails that are doing this.
[26:17.280 --> 26:19.280]  It makes them a lot of money.
[26:19.280 --> 26:21.280]  But we've got a way to get around getting past them.
[26:21.280 --> 26:22.280]  You know, it's all about money.
[26:22.280 --> 26:25.280]  You always got big money interests.
[26:25.280 --> 26:35.280]  And here we've got the lawyers themselves that they can make more money doing it this way.
[26:35.280 --> 26:38.280]  They're not going to care what's right or wrong or what have you.
[26:38.280 --> 26:42.280]  They're going to care about how they can make more money.
[26:42.280 --> 26:46.280]  So we use their system against them.
[26:46.280 --> 26:53.280]  This is their system to promote justice, even though they didn't really care about the justice.
[26:53.280 --> 26:58.280]  Yeah, and that's that's part of an engineer.
[26:58.280 --> 27:08.280]  You can't look at a system that has a systemic failure and blame the operators in the system.
[27:08.280 --> 27:15.280]  If I build the jet engine and it explodes, like every time we build one, it explodes.
[27:15.280 --> 27:19.280]  We can't blame the people who put it together.
[27:19.280 --> 27:24.280]  We have to look at our procedures and how our procedures are not working.
[27:24.280 --> 27:27.280]  What are we missing in the procedures?
[27:27.280 --> 27:41.280]  So always in looking at the law, I never wanted to look for a bad guy because you can't have everybody in a system being criminals.
[27:41.280 --> 27:46.280]  Statistically, 6% of the population are criminals, not 100%.
[27:46.280 --> 27:55.280]  So if these others are doing things wrong, there's something endemically wrong with the system itself.
[27:55.280 --> 28:01.280]  So we need to find a way to make the system work first.
[28:01.280 --> 28:06.280]  Now, I know when I talked about this on Pastor Message Show,
[28:06.280 --> 28:11.280]  and he didn't like the idea that we were helping lawyers make more money.
[28:11.280 --> 28:13.280]  So we'll forget all of that stuff.
[28:13.280 --> 28:15.280]  What is our intended outcome?
[28:15.280 --> 28:27.280]  Our intended outcome is to save the counties a lot of money and keep people from being held in jail for long periods.
[28:27.280 --> 28:32.280]  Whether lawyers make more money or less money, it's irrelevant to this purpose.
[28:32.280 --> 28:42.280]  So if we want lawyers to work in our favor, we have to give them a reason to do so.
[28:42.280 --> 28:47.280]  And if by getting us out of jail more quickly, they can make more money,
[28:47.280 --> 28:57.280]  or by getting our sentence either dropped or cut dramatically, they will do that.
[28:57.280 --> 29:03.280]  So it may be a kind of a backdoor way to fix this thing.
[29:03.280 --> 29:08.280]  Well, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[29:08.280 --> 29:19.280]  We've got one more minute before break. If you have a comment before we go to break, Brett, say something insightful.
[29:19.280 --> 29:26.280]  Like a losing five pounds business?
[29:26.280 --> 29:31.280]  Okay, I put him on the dime. We're about to go to our sponsors.
[29:31.280 --> 29:34.280]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Bowden.
[29:34.280 --> 29:40.280]  When we come back, we'll go to our callers. We have a couple of callers on the line.
[29:40.280 --> 29:47.280]  Tina, and it looks like I have a first-time call. I'll take that one first.
[29:47.280 --> 29:53.280]  Just before I forget, Tina, Ted Scarlett called me and he's not in jail.
[29:53.280 --> 30:01.280]  Hang on. We'll be right back.
[30:01.280 --> 30:06.280]  Businesses ask you for a lot of personal information and you may trust them to keep it safe.
[30:06.280 --> 30:11.280]  But it turns out that even the most trusted companies may be unwittingly revealing your secrets.
[30:11.280 --> 30:15.280]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll be right back with details.
[30:15.280 --> 30:21.280]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.280 --> 30:26.280]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.280 --> 30:31.280]  To protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.280 --> 30:37.280]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:37.280 --> 30:45.280]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.280 --> 30:52.280]  Data privacy is a big deal, so nearly every company has a policy explaining how they handle your personal information.
[30:52.280 --> 30:57.280]  It happens if it escapes their control. It's not an idle question. According to a recent survey,
[30:57.280 --> 31:04.280]  a shocking 90% of U.S. companies admit their security was breached by hackers in the last year.
[31:04.280 --> 31:08.280]  That's one more reason you should trust your searches to StartPage.com.
[31:08.280 --> 31:12.280]  Unlike other search engines, StartPage doesn't store any data on you.
[31:12.280 --> 31:16.280]  They've never been hacked, but even if they were, there would be nothing for criminals to see.
[31:16.280 --> 31:21.280]  The cupboard would be bare. Too bad other companies don't treat your data the same way.
[31:21.280 --> 31:26.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:51.280 --> 31:56.280]  I believe there is more to the story. Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[31:56.280 --> 32:22.280]  Go to www.buildingwatch.org. Why it fell? Why it matters is what you can do.
[32:26.280 --> 32:31.280]  Our Sheriff's Deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.280 --> 32:35.280]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[32:35.280 --> 32:39.280]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[32:39.280 --> 32:43.280]  and ordering your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.280 --> 32:48.280]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:48.280 --> 32:51.280]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[32:51.280 --> 32:55.280]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.280 --> 33:02.280]  For your copy today and together, we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:02.280 --> 33:14.280]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:14.280 --> 33:35.280]  We are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Felton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to go to our callers.
[33:35.280 --> 33:45.280]  We're going to Tina in California. Hello, Tina.
[33:45.280 --> 33:52.280]  Okay, go ahead. I'm sorry. The mute didn't take. The unmute didn't take. Now you're unmuted.
[33:52.280 --> 34:01.280]  I thought you were going to take the new person first. Didn't you have a new person instead?
[34:01.280 --> 34:06.280]  I need to turn my sound up. Okay, say that again.
[34:06.280 --> 34:11.280]  I said I thought you were going to the new caller first.
[34:11.280 --> 34:19.280]  Oh, I was, but I forgot. I was going to pretend like nobody heard that. Okay, hang on. Let me go to it.
[34:19.280 --> 34:24.280]  It may not be a new caller. It just comes up. It's on screen on my system.
[34:24.280 --> 34:32.280]  417 area code. Are you a new caller? Absolutely.
[34:32.280 --> 34:41.280]  Okay, then. Tina, I'm going to leave you unmuted. Okay. In case you have a comment, you're both in California.
[34:41.280 --> 34:50.280]  Okay, what is your first name? Steve. Steve. Okay, Steve. What do you have for us today?
[34:50.280 --> 35:00.280]  Actually, I've been a long time listener, but I have a question. With all the things that you and Eddie and Brett's been talking about and doing,
[35:00.280 --> 35:13.280]  what would it be good to actually have a constitutional convention where whoever can write up a new statement or whatever you want to call it,
[35:13.280 --> 35:28.280]  a new amendment done where it forces the state to train every officer in their duties where they have to absolutely know what laws they're enforcing.
[35:28.280 --> 35:38.280]  And this goes with police officers just as well before they can take any actions against anybody and be tested to ensure that they know their jobs.
[35:38.280 --> 35:50.280]  On top of like the transportation code that Eddie was talking about, transportation is not even in the statues, the term, you know, the definition in it.
[35:50.280 --> 36:03.280]  Well, what kind of constitutional amendment would we write to fix that wrong?
[36:03.280 --> 36:13.280]  That I have not actually a clue. I thought it would be a good discussion in which somebody can bring up that we would have.
[36:13.280 --> 36:23.280]  Oh, we could set some requirements so that the public officials are, they must be literate.
[36:23.280 --> 36:26.280]  But we already have those.
[36:26.280 --> 36:40.280]  But they're not, okay, but they're applying laws just like the property tax laws for police officers who are not responsible to actually know the law only to enforce the law.
[36:40.280 --> 36:43.280]  But yet they don't know a darn thing about the law.
[36:43.280 --> 36:52.280]  Well, okay, we are, I think the reason I asked the question the way I do is, I think we already have what we need in place.
[36:52.280 --> 37:02.280]  We're just not using it. I was in Newark, Texas, and a sheriff's deputy pulled me over.
[37:02.280 --> 37:07.280]  And he came up, I gave him my license and he said, Mr. Kelton, you know why I pulled you over?
[37:07.280 --> 37:10.280]  I said, no, but I'm sure you're going to tell me.
[37:10.280 --> 37:14.280]  He said, well, your registration is expired.
[37:14.280 --> 37:19.280]  I said, only two years, what's the problem?
[37:19.280 --> 37:30.280]  He went back to write a ticket. I called 911 and asked for someone to be sent out to arrest this officer for first degree felony aggravated assault.
[37:30.280 --> 37:41.280]  You see, public officials, the courts have ruled that they don't have to know the law as it applies to their authority.
[37:41.280 --> 37:53.280]  Well, okay, but they do have to know the law as it applies to a criminal act, just like you or I.
[37:53.280 --> 38:00.280]  So when a public official exerts or reports to exert an authority he does not expressly have,
[38:00.280 --> 38:09.280]  and in the process denies a citizen pulled free access to her enjoyment of right, well, that's a criminal act in every state.
[38:09.280 --> 38:14.280]  And he's not allowed to do a criminal act. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
[38:14.280 --> 38:19.280]  Right. Yeah, the fact that he doesn't know what he's doing is criminal.
[38:19.280 --> 38:26.280]  Tell it to the grand jury, Bubba, I'm sure they'll be really understanding.
[38:26.280 --> 38:34.280]  Just as understanding as they will be with me when I say, well, I didn't know the transportation code applied to me.
[38:34.280 --> 38:45.280]  I thought it only applied to commercial drivers. See, we'll see how understanding the grand jury is to public officials.
[38:45.280 --> 38:53.280]  We already have the remedies and we just need to exercise them.
[38:53.280 --> 38:58.280]  That's what he shows about. How do you beat them up?
[38:58.280 --> 39:04.280]  I've got these rules. Never ask a public official to do anything you actually want him to do.
[39:04.280 --> 39:15.280]  Because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law does not command him to do so that when he doesn't, you get to use our remedies.
[39:15.280 --> 39:22.280]  Drag him in front of a grand jury. And if somebody interferes, did you get into the grand jury?
[39:22.280 --> 39:40.280]  Well, hammer them too. The only way we're going to fix this is give these officials an economic reason or a liberty based reason to do things right.
[39:40.280 --> 39:49.280]  And one that we actually enforce doesn't matter how many laws we have. If you and I don't enforce them.
[39:49.280 --> 39:52.280]  Does that make sense?
[39:52.280 --> 40:01.280]  Yeah, I understand. For most people, we're not as literate as you and Brandy or Brett.
[40:01.280 --> 40:08.280]  And as you said before, you know, some people who studied law like in the classes and everything else, get it right up to their heads.
[40:08.280 --> 40:12.280]  And then as soon as they stand up in front of people, they stutter and they mess up everything.
[40:12.280 --> 40:22.280]  And we don't actually have access to someone to talk to to fix the situation or how to write out complaints or anything like that.
[40:22.280 --> 40:27.280]  And you are, you are exactly right.
[40:27.280 --> 40:31.280]  And that has always been the problem.
[40:31.280 --> 40:38.280]  That's why I've spent all this time working on this questionnaire.
[40:38.280 --> 40:46.280]  It's hard to explain all the law to someone and even when I do someone who doesn't know law.
[40:46.280 --> 40:52.280]  When I start throwing these statutes and rules and regulations at you.
[40:52.280 --> 41:05.280]  I might as well be talking in a foreign language, because you just don't have the mental room to stitch all this together in one or two or even three or four settings.
[41:05.280 --> 41:10.280]  It's complex. So it's hard to put it all together.
[41:10.280 --> 41:23.280]  The electronic lawyer project that we've been working on for the last 13 years is designed so that you just go to this website, click on the questionnaire and answer the questions.
[41:23.280 --> 41:28.280]  And it will start spitting out your remedies.
[41:28.280 --> 41:38.280]  And for trafficticket.website, if you get a ticket and you go to trafficticket.website, you put in your ticket information and it starts spitting out documents.
[41:38.280 --> 41:40.280]  You don't have to know all of this.
[41:40.280 --> 41:43.280]  And it didn't go through.
[41:43.280 --> 41:44.280]  Say that again?
[41:44.280 --> 41:53.280]  On your trafficticket.website, when I put it on my computer, it wouldn't go through at all.
[41:53.280 --> 42:01.280]  Well, make sure you get traffic ticket and not tickets for singular.
[42:01.280 --> 42:04.280]  Well, double check that.
[42:04.280 --> 42:08.280]  Okay.
[42:08.280 --> 42:17.280]  But that's my question. I didn't know if there would be an amendment that we can actually do because Eddie, I listened to him and he's very passionate.
[42:17.280 --> 42:20.280]  Strong passionate, I would say.
[42:20.280 --> 42:26.280]  And he's been very frustrated about saying, I don't want him to blow a cab.
[42:26.280 --> 42:29.280]  Yeah, I'm starting to say he's more than passionate.
[42:29.280 --> 42:32.280]  He's a little volatile.
[42:32.280 --> 42:38.280]  But far be it for me to criticize my fellow broadcaster.
[42:38.280 --> 42:42.280]  But we need to do a show one day just talking bad about Eddie.
[42:42.280 --> 42:47.280]  I haven't trashed Eddie in a long time.
[42:47.280 --> 42:50.280]  I'll stay out of it.
[42:50.280 --> 42:55.280]  Yeah, Eddie and I both struggled with the same thing.
[42:55.280 --> 43:03.280]  People that want to be able to fight this fight, they want to be able to express their rights and protect them.
[43:03.280 --> 43:07.280]  But it's difficult. It's complex.
[43:07.280 --> 43:10.280]  So, you know, and you hear me on the show, I have all these rules.
[43:10.280 --> 43:19.280]  Well, these rules are in there so that they keep you focused in a way that moves you toward remedy.
[43:19.280 --> 43:22.280]  But they're not enough.
[43:22.280 --> 43:26.280]  And that's why I'm building this electronic lawyer.
[43:26.280 --> 43:31.280]  You don't have to know all of the laws and all of the rules and all the regulations.
[43:31.280 --> 43:38.280]  You just go through the questionnaire and it will spit out that part of the law that applies to you.
[43:38.280 --> 43:41.280]  And you don't have to worry about all the rest of it.
[43:41.280 --> 43:44.280]  And then you get a set of documents, sign them and send them.
[43:44.280 --> 43:49.280]  And then it will tell you how to address those documents when they don't act appropriately on it.
[43:49.280 --> 43:50.280]  Hang on.
[43:50.280 --> 43:52.280]  We'll go into our sponsors.
[43:52.280 --> 43:56.280]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[43:56.280 --> 44:00.280]  We'll be right back.
[44:00.280 --> 44:01.280]  I love logos.
[44:01.280 --> 44:04.280]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[44:04.280 --> 44:07.280]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[44:07.280 --> 44:08.280]  I need my truth fit.
[44:08.280 --> 44:10.280]  I'd be lost without logos.
[44:10.280 --> 44:13.280]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[44:13.280 --> 44:16.280]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a lullite.
[44:16.280 --> 44:20.280]  And I really don't have any money to give because I spend it all on supplements.
[44:20.280 --> 44:22.280]  How can I help logos?
[44:22.280 --> 44:24.280]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[44:24.280 --> 44:29.280]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[44:29.280 --> 44:31.280]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[44:31.280 --> 44:37.280]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com, tick on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[44:37.280 --> 44:43.280]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos.
[44:43.280 --> 44:44.280]  Do I pay extra?
[44:44.280 --> 44:45.280]  No.
[44:45.280 --> 44:47.280]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[44:47.280 --> 44:48.280]  No.
[44:48.280 --> 44:49.280]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[44:49.280 --> 44:50.280]  No.
[44:50.280 --> 44:51.280]  I mean, yes.
[44:51.280 --> 44:52.280]  Wow.
[44:52.280 --> 44:54.280]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[44:54.280 --> 44:55.280]  This is perfect.
[44:55.280 --> 44:57.280]  Thank you so much.
[44:57.280 --> 44:58.280]  You're welcome.
[44:58.280 --> 45:01.280]  Happy holidays, logos.
[45:28.280 --> 45:34.280]  The Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.280 --> 45:43.280]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.280 --> 45:52.280]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.280 --> 46:01.280]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.280 --> 46:32.280]  Thank you.
[46:32.280 --> 46:42.280]  Thank you.
[46:42.280 --> 46:55.280]  Okay, we are back.
[46:55.280 --> 46:57.280]  Randy Kelton, rule of law radio.
[46:57.280 --> 46:58.280]  I'm sorry.
[46:58.280 --> 46:59.280]  I didn't write your name down.
[46:59.280 --> 47:03.280]  Oh wait, I've got you muted.
[47:03.280 --> 47:05.280]  That was Steve.
[47:05.280 --> 47:06.280]  Steve.
[47:06.280 --> 47:07.280]  Okay.
[47:07.280 --> 47:08.280]  That's right.
[47:08.280 --> 47:14.280]  I know that I have a brother named Steve in California in the Long Beach.
[47:14.280 --> 47:17.280]  Okay, Steve.
[47:17.280 --> 47:19.280]  Okay.
[47:19.280 --> 47:34.280]  So how can we have the state being responsible for letting off the police officers and give them leaner sentences than the average person who would do lesser of a crime?
[47:34.280 --> 47:37.280]  Okay, I got a solution for that.
[47:37.280 --> 47:51.280]  Whoever lets the person off like a prosecuting attorney, a prosecuting attorney is given discretion, but they're not given caprice.
[47:51.280 --> 48:06.280]  So when a prosecuting attorney exercises his discretion and his discretion is in variance with the clear letter of law, that's an abusive discretion.
[48:06.280 --> 48:17.280]  If the abuse of that discretion denies me and the equal protection of the laws, then that's crime.
[48:17.280 --> 48:23.280]  Do you only nut the police officer who actually committing the crime?
[48:23.280 --> 48:27.280]  The police officers will never police themselves.
[48:27.280 --> 48:36.280]  The prosecuting attorney is in place to do that, and when the prosecutor doesn't do his job, we beat up the prosecutor.
[48:36.280 --> 48:55.280]  And when the prosecutor starts doing his job, all of the policemen will start doing theirs because they don't want, because the one prosecutor has access to all the police whereas a time best spent.
[48:55.280 --> 48:57.280]  So your problem you have is you're in California.
[48:57.280 --> 48:59.280]  Before you.
[48:59.280 --> 49:05.280]  And California is by far the most corrupt.
[49:05.280 --> 49:11.280]  Go ahead, Brett.
[49:11.280 --> 49:14.280]  I'll go ahead, Brett.
[49:14.280 --> 49:32.280]  I was going to just ask Randy, let me pinch to you what I believe is what's my understanding from listening to you about caprice versus discretion and see if it jobs with your understanding of the difference.
[49:32.280 --> 49:43.280]  When I look at a prosecutor exercising appropriate discretion, I believe that goes to he looks at the charges.
[49:43.280 --> 49:48.280]  He says, is this charge, does this charge need to go to court?
[49:48.280 --> 49:51.280]  He's focused on the charge, not the person, not the accused.
[49:51.280 --> 49:58.280]  He's looking at the charges and he says, this guy parted his hair on the left, big deal.
[49:58.280 --> 50:03.280]  Or he looks at the charge and he says, well, you've only met five of the seven elements of this offense.
[50:03.280 --> 50:05.280]  I can't bring this to court.
[50:05.280 --> 50:11.280]  So he has some discretion whether or not this is going to move forward to court.
[50:11.280 --> 50:15.280]  Versus looking at, oh, well, that's a police officer.
[50:15.280 --> 50:16.280]  I'm not going to go try.
[50:16.280 --> 50:18.280]  I'm not going to bother him.
[50:18.280 --> 50:19.280]  That's a judge.
[50:19.280 --> 50:20.280]  Oh, my goodness.
[50:20.280 --> 50:24.280]  No, I'm not going to bring that to a court.
[50:24.280 --> 50:38.280]  Would you say that's a that's exactly that is exactly what I mean by caprice caprice is where the prosecutor does what he wants to do.
[50:38.280 --> 50:48.280]  As opposed to what the law and the facts dictate that he reasonably should do.
[50:48.280 --> 51:00.280]  And in, you know, I talk about this mostly in Pennsylvania because in Pennsylvania you have standing and prosecutors have discretion by statute.
[51:00.280 --> 51:12.280]  So when you file a complaint with the prosecutor and he elects not to prosecute when there are sufficient facts to warrant a prosecution, I call that caprice.
[51:12.280 --> 51:15.280]  He just decides he doesn't want to bother.
[51:15.280 --> 51:20.280]  Well, that's not included in his oath.
[51:20.280 --> 51:24.280]  I swear on my oath that I'll do what I want to.
[51:24.280 --> 51:28.280]  I've never seen an oath like that.
[51:28.280 --> 51:37.280]  So if we start taking them on every and the best tool that we have is not law.
[51:37.280 --> 51:42.280]  The best tools that we have is insurance.
[51:42.280 --> 51:44.280]  I didn't say that right.
[51:44.280 --> 51:48.280]  The best tools we have are insurance.
[51:48.280 --> 51:57.280]  Oh, well, insurance, the way you get to insurance is by filing professional conduct complaints.
[51:57.280 --> 52:06.280]  In California, there is a organization that certifies police officers.
[52:06.280 --> 52:15.280]  If you file a professional conduct complaint against a police officer with that licensing agency.
[52:15.280 --> 52:20.280]  The licensing agency will get your complaint and throw it in the trash.
[52:20.280 --> 52:30.280]  However, they will have to give notice to their insurer that one of their officers got a professional conduct complaint.
[52:30.280 --> 52:42.280]  While the agency cares if the complaint is valid or not, the insurance company does not care.
[52:42.280 --> 52:47.280]  They only know how many and they only care how many.
[52:47.280 --> 52:56.280]  Six professional conduct complaints, you become an unacceptable risk because you have an insurance agent back there.
[52:56.280 --> 53:04.280]  His primary purpose is to avoid paying claims and collect all the money he can.
[53:04.280 --> 53:14.280]  So the more complaints he gets against a particular individual, the more likely he is to have to pay a claim.
[53:14.280 --> 53:24.280]  In order to cover himself for that potential claim, he charges the agency more money because like police departments,
[53:24.280 --> 53:29.280]  you have one insurance policy for the whole police department.
[53:29.280 --> 53:32.280]  He can't raise the rate on one policeman.
[53:32.280 --> 53:36.280]  He raises the rate on all policemen.
[53:36.280 --> 53:46.280]  So Steve, what's going to happen when you file half a dozen professional conduct complaints against his police officer and the bonding agent
[53:46.280 --> 53:52.280]  for the agency comes to them and says, you got this guy here who's an unacceptable risk.
[53:52.280 --> 53:59.280]  If he stays in your employ, we raise the bond rating for the entire department.
[53:59.280 --> 54:02.280]  Bye, Bubba.
[54:02.280 --> 54:08.280]  You need to figure out how to say, do you want fries with that?
[54:08.280 --> 54:16.280]  Because if one agency has to fire him, no other agency will hire him.
[54:16.280 --> 54:18.280]  He's an unacceptable risk.
[54:18.280 --> 54:20.280]  That's the tool we have.
[54:20.280 --> 54:22.280]  Bar grievances.
[54:22.280 --> 54:26.280]  One bar grievance, your first year of practice, they cancel immediately.
[54:26.280 --> 54:30.280]  Two bar grievances, any one year of practice, they cancel.
[54:30.280 --> 54:33.280]  Three, they cancel your law firm's malpractice insurance.
[54:33.280 --> 54:37.280]  Valid, invalid, they don't care.
[54:37.280 --> 54:41.280]  Even judges, judges have to be bonded.
[54:41.280 --> 54:46.280]  Professional conduct complaints stack up on them and cause them the same problem.
[54:46.280 --> 54:52.280]  We need to become chronic complainers.
[54:52.280 --> 54:53.280]  Yeah, I agree with you.
[54:53.280 --> 54:56.280]  I do got one more question that I'll let you go on this.
[54:56.280 --> 55:02.280]  Do you have CDs, you or Eddie, that actually will have a visual screen,
[55:02.280 --> 55:06.280]  whatever you can see, what is actually being written and talking about?
[55:06.280 --> 55:09.280]  Because when I read, I get mixed up.
[55:09.280 --> 55:12.280]  I have to go over and over at least 20, 30 times.
[55:12.280 --> 55:15.280]  I've just been doing on residence for property.
[55:15.280 --> 55:18.280]  And I got somewhat figured out.
[55:18.280 --> 55:22.280]  So that took me two years to figure it out in some ways.
[55:22.280 --> 55:29.280]  Is there a city in which you could see what somebody's doing and how they've done it?
[55:29.280 --> 55:36.280]  The only way to do that, we have so many different people with so many different cases
[55:36.280 --> 55:37.280]  and different documentation.
[55:37.280 --> 55:42.280]  It would be really unfeasible to load all of those up.
[55:42.280 --> 55:44.280]  And even if we did, it's too many to read.
[55:44.280 --> 55:54.280]  You take a case, find a case that's very similar to yours and go down to the courthouse
[55:54.280 --> 55:58.280]  and pull all the documents.
[55:58.280 --> 56:02.280]  When I first started legal research, that's how I did it.
[56:02.280 --> 56:11.280]  I went down to the county court or the district court, a small county.
[56:11.280 --> 56:17.280]  I went to the district court and asked to see all of the big cases.
[56:17.280 --> 56:19.280]  They said, what?
[56:19.280 --> 56:24.280]  I want the big cases, the cases where they fought real hard on both sides.
[56:24.280 --> 56:29.280]  And they brought me out a case against Mitchell Energy.
[56:29.280 --> 56:33.280]  It was three boxes.
[56:33.280 --> 56:37.280]  But I found incredible documents in there.
[56:37.280 --> 56:45.280]  You look at a case similar to yours that's especially one that's been hard fought.
[56:45.280 --> 56:51.280]  And go through all the documents the lawyers have filed.
[56:51.280 --> 56:53.280]  You'll be surprised what you'll find in there.
[56:53.280 --> 56:58.280]  You'll find a motion in Lemony.
[56:58.280 --> 56:59.280]  I first looked at that.
[56:59.280 --> 57:01.280]  I saw this motion in Lemony.
[57:01.280 --> 57:03.280]  What on earth is that?
[57:03.280 --> 57:15.280]  And then when I started looking at it, a motion in Lemony is a motion that lists all of the questions the other side can't ask.
[57:15.280 --> 57:19.280]  I would have never known about that if I hadn't looked in the files.
[57:19.280 --> 57:30.280]  And you'll find a lot of other tools and remedies that you can use just by looking through the court files.
[57:30.280 --> 57:39.280]  Other than that, I've got my e-book where I explain how things really work in the real world.
[57:39.280 --> 57:44.280]  But that doesn't track an individual case.
[57:44.280 --> 57:50.280]  Eddie has his blog where they have a lot of people talking about their cases.
[57:50.280 --> 57:55.280]  But law is so complex and situations are so different.
[57:55.280 --> 58:05.280]  You know how to lay something out that would sort out your specific issue.
[58:05.280 --> 58:12.280]  That's exactly what this questionnaire that we're developing will do.
[58:12.280 --> 58:21.280]  It will walk you right through all of the facts and law that have applied to your case and your case only.
[58:21.280 --> 58:26.280]  So don't waste your time with a lot of stuff that's not relevant to your case.
[58:26.280 --> 58:29.280]  But that's the best I can offer.
[58:29.280 --> 58:31.280]  That's fine. That's fine.
[58:31.280 --> 58:39.280]  I was just mainly trying to do you know about complaints, bar grievance and all that stuff, how to write one down, exactly how to do it.
[58:39.280 --> 58:41.280]  Because when I was trying to read, I got confused.
[58:41.280 --> 58:43.280]  Okay, wait, wait. Hang on.
[58:43.280 --> 58:45.280]  I have to go to the sponsors.
[58:45.280 --> 58:50.280]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, we'll be right back.
[58:50.280 --> 58:54.280]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:54.280 --> 58:58.280]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.280 --> 59:06.280]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.280 --> 59:09.280]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.280 --> 59:13.280]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate.
[59:13.280 --> 59:18.280]  But the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.280 --> 59:28.280]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.280 --> 59:33.280]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.280 --> 59:44.280]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.280 --> 59:48.280]  by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.280 --> 59:53.280]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:53.280 --> 01:00:01.280]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:01.280 --> 01:00:06.280]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Low Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.280 --> 01:00:17.280]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019, open with precious metals, gold $1,429 an ounce, silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce,
[01:00:17.280 --> 01:00:29.280]  oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52,
[01:00:29.280 --> 01:00:46.280]  Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin.
[01:00:46.280 --> 01:01:00.280]  Today in History, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade, killing 10 and entering 40.
[01:01:00.280 --> 01:01:04.280]  Today in History.
[01:01:04.280 --> 01:01:17.280]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing HEPA to tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges,
[01:01:17.280 --> 01:01:24.280]  and even refusing to file new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC.
[01:01:24.280 --> 01:01:33.280]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:33.280 --> 01:01:48.280]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas, and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works,
[01:01:48.280 --> 01:02:01.280]  as well as other cities, too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Kaima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.280 --> 01:02:13.280]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.280 --> 01:02:22.280]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[01:02:22.280 --> 01:02:39.280]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.280 --> 01:02:54.280]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:54.280 --> 01:03:10.280]  This is the first work roadie with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:10.280 --> 01:03:25.280]  This is the first work roadie with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:25.280 --> 01:03:45.280]  This is the first work roadie with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:45.280 --> 01:04:08.280]  This is the first work roadie with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:04:08.280 --> 01:04:17.280]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain with our radio, and we're talking to Steve in California.
[01:04:17.280 --> 01:04:19.280]  Okay, Steve, go ahead.
[01:04:19.280 --> 01:04:24.280]  Steve in Missouri.
[01:04:24.280 --> 01:04:30.280]  Missouri. Oh, my, my, my deal here says California.
[01:04:30.280 --> 01:04:31.280]  Okay.
[01:04:31.280 --> 01:04:42.280]  Not because the California's thorn in the side. The lady. Missouri has some really garbage laws, but nothing as bad as California.
[01:04:42.280 --> 01:04:44.280]  So you're better often.
[01:04:44.280 --> 01:04:45.280]  Yes.
[01:04:45.280 --> 01:04:46.280]  This way.
[01:04:46.280 --> 01:04:53.280]  Okay, well, I want to get off. I was going to ask Brett one question, and then I'll let go. He could just say yes or no.
[01:04:53.280 --> 01:05:00.280]  Did you resolve the issue about your house being broken and your stuff taken?
[01:05:00.280 --> 01:05:11.280]  No, it's not resolved. The stuff was taken and the local police there did not want to even take a report.
[01:05:11.280 --> 01:05:22.280]  They didn't want to even give me a form where I could report on my own. They just wanted me to go away.
[01:05:22.280 --> 01:05:31.280]  Well, that don't surprise me because, I mean, you guys are real good at what you're doing and a guy like me or anybody else will be quite that challenge.
[01:05:31.280 --> 01:05:34.280]  But I'll let you talk to Tina.
[01:05:34.280 --> 01:05:35.280]  Thanks for calling.
[01:05:35.280 --> 01:05:36.280]  Okay.
[01:05:36.280 --> 01:05:37.280]  Yeah.
[01:05:37.280 --> 01:05:39.280]  Thank you guys. Have a good day.
[01:05:39.280 --> 01:05:44.280]  Thank you, Steve. Now we're going to Miss Tina in California.
[01:05:44.280 --> 01:05:53.280]  Just so you know, I mentioned last time that I was concerned about Ted's car. It hadn't heard from him in a long time.
[01:05:53.280 --> 01:06:03.280]  And I was ready to start calling the local constabulary, but he called me and kind of brought me up to speed.
[01:06:03.280 --> 01:06:05.280]  So he's okay. Okay.
[01:06:05.280 --> 01:06:09.280]  What do you have for us today, Tina?
[01:06:09.280 --> 01:06:20.280]  Well, I have two questions. One is for a friend of mine, which I will ask first, and then I will ask him my question, which is for something coming up this next week.
[01:06:20.280 --> 01:06:25.280]  Say one about my friend you've spoken to him briefly, James.
[01:06:25.280 --> 01:06:33.280]  He is a most recent attorney and he has been through many who have financially reached him to the end of the group.
[01:06:33.280 --> 01:06:36.280]  And I mean to the end of the group.
[01:06:36.280 --> 01:06:44.280]  This last one at the last hearing came up and said the judge and says, well, I want to withdraw from the case.
[01:06:44.280 --> 01:06:52.280]  There in my and the judge apparently said, well, I guess if you're going to do it, you better do it now.
[01:06:52.280 --> 01:07:01.280]  And James objected that I object and the judge screamed at him to shut up or he is removing from the courtroom.
[01:07:01.280 --> 01:07:06.280]  And so he sat down, but he wanted to get the objection on record.
[01:07:06.280 --> 01:07:21.280]  Now, this attorney's been pretty, like all these others have, every time she asked money from him and he gives it to her, she disappears on vacation and then does something for him at the very last second or doesn't file things for months,
[01:07:21.280 --> 01:07:27.280]  which the other side noted to the court that nothing has been filed in four months.
[01:07:27.280 --> 01:07:32.280]  And he has apparently spent $55,000 with this attorney.
[01:07:32.280 --> 01:07:34.280]  And this is just one of them.
[01:07:34.280 --> 01:07:38.280]  She has stopped three summary judgments.
[01:07:38.280 --> 01:07:39.280]  And that's it.
[01:07:39.280 --> 01:07:47.280]  Sue did tell him to file suit against the judge for interfering with the private contract.
[01:07:47.280 --> 01:07:57.280]  Well, they've got a hearing coming up on Wednesday and I said, you need to be prepared. He said, well, I'm probably not going to go and then I won't upset the judge.
[01:07:57.280 --> 01:07:58.280]  I said, absolutely not.
[01:07:58.280 --> 01:08:04.280]  You must go in case the attorney lies out for back teeth about you and the case.
[01:08:04.280 --> 01:08:06.280]  You have to go.
[01:08:06.280 --> 01:08:08.280]  I don't care what you say you have to go.
[01:08:08.280 --> 01:08:09.280]  Am I correct?
[01:08:09.280 --> 01:08:15.280]  Tell him you are correct and have him take someone with him.
[01:08:15.280 --> 01:08:28.280]  Interesting. He found a very recent in the last two weeks complaint somewhere on the Internet about the very same attorney who's done the very same thing, taken lots of money, hasn't done the case.
[01:08:28.280 --> 01:08:43.280]  I told him to get hold of this person however they can, go to the door, give them a nice letter, take his partner with him so he's not going alone as a man and try to see if that person will come as a witness
[01:08:43.280 --> 01:08:49.280]  and collaborate on maybe filing a similar complaint against this attorney.
[01:08:49.280 --> 01:08:51.280]  I don't know if there's a way.
[01:08:51.280 --> 01:09:00.280]  You need to sue the attorney, do a civil suit against the attorney for malpractice.
[01:09:00.280 --> 01:09:02.280]  For malpractice, okay.
[01:09:02.280 --> 01:09:08.280]  Do they have ineffective assistance of counsel as well?
[01:09:08.280 --> 01:09:16.280]  What I'm hearing here is the lawyer, has the lawyer taken money or is he charged?
[01:09:16.280 --> 01:09:18.280]  Oh, yeah.
[01:09:18.280 --> 01:09:31.280]  What I'm getting at is all of the money he's received has that been through retainers or has he taken money that didn't belong to him?
[01:09:31.280 --> 01:09:40.280]  He, she actually, named Loreley, she took a retainer, she says she's used up the retainer but she's taken more money along the way.
[01:09:40.280 --> 01:09:45.280]  Every time he wanted something done, she would charge him $4,000, $5,000, whatever.
[01:09:45.280 --> 01:09:54.280]  She has never given him an accounting of what she's done for the money and I believe that's a violation of their business and professional course.
[01:09:54.280 --> 01:10:02.280]  That's malpractice. It's just a file of malpractice suit against him or her.
[01:10:02.280 --> 01:10:03.280]  Okay.
[01:10:03.280 --> 01:10:04.280]  Yes.
[01:10:04.280 --> 01:10:05.280]  Okay.
[01:10:05.280 --> 01:10:14.280]  And the other, could the, if the other part is willing to collaborate with them, could they file a malpractice suit jointly or should they do one individually?
[01:10:14.280 --> 01:10:29.280]  Individually. And collaborate with one another so that they can both use essentially the same research and work but sue them separately because the two totally separate cases.
[01:10:29.280 --> 01:10:37.280]  The last thing you want to try to do is get into a class action.
[01:10:37.280 --> 01:10:40.280]  And two wouldn't be enough to establish a class.
[01:10:40.280 --> 01:10:43.280]  So you both have to sue separately.
[01:10:43.280 --> 01:10:44.280]  Okay.
[01:10:44.280 --> 01:10:56.280]  It will cost her more to defend them and it will go against her record and likely get her insurance canceled.
[01:10:56.280 --> 01:11:04.280]  If she has any, she never told them and they're required to tell you upfront whether they have insurance or not.
[01:11:04.280 --> 01:11:13.280]  I've heard that from looking at the rules of professional conduct. An attorney must tell you if they do not have malpractice insurance.
[01:11:13.280 --> 01:11:15.280]  Oh, nice.
[01:11:15.280 --> 01:11:16.280]  Mm-hmm.
[01:11:16.280 --> 01:11:26.280]  Well, you might do a search in the, through the court record for her name.
[01:11:26.280 --> 01:11:41.280]  You may find somebody else who's already sued her. And you'll also find other clients that she's had and you can contact them and ask if she's pulled the same thing on them.
[01:11:41.280 --> 01:11:49.280]  You get four or five people and you make up one lawsuit and spread it around against the four or five people and each one's suing her separately.
[01:11:49.280 --> 01:11:53.280]  That's the kind of thing that will get you disbarred.
[01:11:53.280 --> 01:12:02.280]  Yeah, my suggestion to him was to get together with this other lady and all of them, the him and his partner and her and her partners,
[01:12:02.280 --> 01:12:12.280]  read the Florida rules of professional conduct in the ABA rules and pull out everything that she has done to violate those rules,
[01:12:12.280 --> 01:12:19.280]  write that down and then compile with them. I said, you know.
[01:12:19.280 --> 01:12:28.280]  And tell them when you read the rules of professional conduct, generally the first three chapters are all that matter.
[01:12:28.280 --> 01:12:35.280]  The first three chapters go to a lawyer's behavior.
[01:12:35.280 --> 01:12:45.280]  Beyond chapter three, you go to the rules for selling a law firm or lawyer to lawyer issues or lawyer to court issues.
[01:12:45.280 --> 01:12:49.280]  So it's not that much they have to read. Okay.
[01:12:49.280 --> 01:12:55.280]  Now, as far as the judge, he's terrified now because he's got one month, apparently he's going to trial.
[01:12:55.280 --> 01:13:00.280]  He doesn't know if it's a trial by jury or a jury trial.
[01:13:00.280 --> 01:13:10.280]  I think it's a jury trial based on mortgage contracts and Florida seems to not want trial by juries in mortgage cases.
[01:13:10.280 --> 01:13:19.280]  But he's terrified of upsetting this judge and turning him against him because I told him based on one of your other calls that I'd heard
[01:13:19.280 --> 01:13:25.280]  that the judge was interfering with a contract and you can go after the judge and he said, but then he'll make my case worse.
[01:13:25.280 --> 01:13:29.280]  He's only given me 30 days to apply all this information to the other side.
[01:13:29.280 --> 01:13:36.280]  I said, well, he's now told you that you have 30 days and he's encouraged the attorney to withdraw.
[01:13:36.280 --> 01:13:42.280]  So he's interfering with a contract and you need to motion to get more time to find adequate counsel.
[01:13:42.280 --> 01:13:50.280]  Even if you don't find one, it'll give you time to do what you need to do. Is that correct?
[01:13:50.280 --> 01:13:58.280]  Yes, that's correct. That's a good strategy because they always want you to have counsel who can rob you.
[01:13:58.280 --> 01:14:01.280]  If you don't have counsel, there's nobody to steal from you.
[01:14:01.280 --> 01:14:03.280]  Who's going to throw you under the bus?
[01:14:03.280 --> 01:14:06.280]  Yeah, he's definitely going to throw you under the bus.
[01:14:06.280 --> 01:14:11.280]  And pro se clients are just not cooperative that way.
[01:14:11.280 --> 01:14:16.280]  They tend not to throw themselves under the bus except by accident.
[01:14:16.280 --> 01:14:27.280]  So if you ask for a continuance to get counsel, they can't force you into court without a lawyer unless you sign a waiver.
[01:14:27.280 --> 01:14:33.280]  And you have to sign that waiver in court after full disclosure, free of coercion.
[01:14:33.280 --> 01:14:39.280]  And if you have a screaming judge, has he filed a Judicic Honda complaint against the judge?
[01:14:39.280 --> 01:14:46.280]  No, because he's afraid that he's going to upset the judge and then it'll make it worse against him.
[01:14:46.280 --> 01:14:54.280]  Then he needs a court watcher, someone else to file criminal charges against the judge.
[01:14:54.280 --> 01:14:58.280]  Screaming at someone in court is not within scope.
[01:14:58.280 --> 01:15:03.280]  No, it's a violation of the judicial canons of ethics.
[01:15:03.280 --> 01:15:09.280]  It's also a extremist conduct.
[01:15:09.280 --> 01:15:11.280]  Okay.
[01:15:11.280 --> 01:15:14.280]  Criminal.
[01:15:14.280 --> 01:15:28.280]  You know, you've been through this where the judges protect the lawyers at seemingly all costs and the state bar protects the lawyers.
[01:15:28.280 --> 01:15:43.280]  Well, what they're not showing you is when someone like you comes along and runs the lawyer through the ringer, the state bar and these other judges, they're not going to want to have that happen again.
[01:15:43.280 --> 01:15:57.280]  Because especially when you start going after them for protecting the lawyer, they're going to get tired of being hammered to protect this lawyer and they will get the lawyer straightened out.
[01:15:57.280 --> 01:15:59.280]  That's the only way we can do this.
[01:15:59.280 --> 01:16:12.280]  In that same vein, I would suggest when you sit down to look at these bar rules about what they're violating, take a good look and find where they're supervisors.
[01:16:12.280 --> 01:16:24.280]  And their partners are liable for either facilitating or for not mitigating the damage that the other subordinate lawyer is violating.
[01:16:24.280 --> 01:16:26.280]  Take a look at that.
[01:16:26.280 --> 01:16:30.280]  Apparently this attorney's got her own practice.
[01:16:30.280 --> 01:16:34.280]  She doesn't have a supervisor or anyone else.
[01:16:34.280 --> 01:16:38.280]  I think we're going up the cliff.
[01:16:38.280 --> 01:16:44.280]  Yeah, we're about to. I was going to say, make sure you file complaints with a better business.
[01:16:44.280 --> 01:16:47.280]  That won't help her.
[01:16:47.280 --> 01:16:51.280]  Hang on. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, move our radio.
[01:16:51.280 --> 01:17:00.280]  I'll call it number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.280 --> 01:17:05.280]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[01:17:05.280 --> 01:17:11.280]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8th from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time.
[01:17:11.280 --> 01:17:14.280]  Our goal is in accord with Matthew 516.
[01:17:14.280 --> 01:17:21.280]  Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
[01:17:21.280 --> 01:17:26.280]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[01:17:26.280 --> 01:17:34.280]  Join Nana and guests for both verse by verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[01:17:34.280 --> 01:17:40.280]  Our verse by verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week.
[01:17:40.280 --> 01:17:47.280]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character development.
[01:17:47.280 --> 01:18:04.280]  So mark your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8th for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[01:18:04.280 --> 01:18:11.280]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:18:11.280 --> 01:18:18.280]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Any amount is appreciated. Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[01:18:18.280 --> 01:18:24.280]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[01:18:24.280 --> 01:18:30.280]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:18:30.280 --> 01:18:35.280]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:18:35.280 --> 01:18:39.280]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:18:39.280 --> 01:18:48.280]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[01:18:48.280 --> 01:18:55.280]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:18:55.280 --> 01:19:00.280]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:19:00.280 --> 01:19:11.280]  This is Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.280 --> 01:19:31.280]  Music playing.
[01:19:31.280 --> 01:19:35.280]  Hey, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Staunton.
[01:19:35.280 --> 01:19:42.280]  We live on Radio and I clicked my Seder too quick. Come on, Seder.
[01:19:42.280 --> 01:19:49.280]  Okay, Seder's working. And we're talking to Tina in California. Okay, Tina.
[01:19:49.280 --> 01:19:55.280]  Okay, so one last question. What should he be prepared to say to the judge?
[01:19:55.280 --> 01:20:04.280]  Because obviously the judge is going to say, well, you know, this council feels like, you know, you're going in opposite directions in terms of litigation strategy.
[01:20:04.280 --> 01:20:08.280]  And you don't feel that she's adequate. So why do you even want her?
[01:20:08.280 --> 01:20:19.280]  And remember, Brett, you said something about this. What should he be prepared to say about the issue?
[01:20:19.280 --> 01:20:21.280]  Here's the question.
[01:20:21.280 --> 01:20:24.280]  Here's the question.
[01:20:24.280 --> 01:20:27.280]  Yeah, this is not your business. It's my business.
[01:20:27.280 --> 01:20:38.280]  This is not your contract. It's my contract and you're forbidden by constitution from interfering with that contract.
[01:20:38.280 --> 01:20:44.280]  Okay, but I have a concern here.
[01:20:44.280 --> 01:20:52.280]  We are assuming that the judge is the bad guy here.
[01:20:52.280 --> 01:20:56.280]  And people never tell you everything.
[01:20:56.280 --> 01:21:00.280]  But the judge screaming at someone in the courtroom.
[01:21:00.280 --> 01:21:10.280]  I know it sounds horrible, but it takes something to get a judge to scream at you in the courtroom.
[01:21:10.280 --> 01:21:19.280]  What has, has this guy had trouble with the judge? How has he been addressing his case?
[01:21:19.280 --> 01:21:29.280]  He is a little bit somewhat sometimes aggressive when he feels like he's being kicked under the bus and run over twice.
[01:21:29.280 --> 01:21:38.280]  What he'll do is when he's a turner's refused to object, he'll stand up and object because all his turners refused to object to anything the other side does.
[01:21:38.280 --> 01:21:45.280]  And so he'll say, you know, your honor, I'd like to say something. He always says your honor.
[01:21:45.280 --> 01:21:58.280]  But the judge is when, you know, as I've heard and I've experienced, if you have an attorney, you sit and shut up and you're not allowed to speak because it's your attorney's job.
[01:21:58.280 --> 01:22:01.280]  But you can't get your attorney to do what you want them to do.
[01:22:01.280 --> 01:22:06.280]  So, you know, he wanted to object to this and have it at least on the record.
[01:22:06.280 --> 01:22:10.280]  So he set up and said, you're on my object.
[01:22:10.280 --> 01:22:29.280]  Well, at this point, I'm, I'm kind of reluctant to say go after the judge, go after the lawyer, but really need to know more about what's going on because generally when something sounds too outrageous, it generally is.
[01:22:29.280 --> 01:22:33.280]  And your friend may not be telling you everything.
[01:22:33.280 --> 01:22:42.280]  If we advise him on something too harsh, he may hurt himself more than help.
[01:22:42.280 --> 01:22:49.280]  Remember the woman who called in about being drug out of her car and slammed to the ground?
[01:22:49.280 --> 01:22:51.280]  Yeah.
[01:22:51.280 --> 01:22:57.280]  She wasn't drug out of her car and slammed to the ground.
[01:22:57.280 --> 01:23:09.280]  She didn't walk that way. So we have to, and I've had this a number of times and she couldn't legitimately remember it that way because what she was engaged in was pretty traumatic.
[01:23:09.280 --> 01:23:20.280]  Her husband was so drunk that he picked up the pistol he was licensed to carry and pointed it at a police officer.
[01:23:20.280 --> 01:23:28.280]  And yeah, they were all yelling gun. Everybody had their guns out when they finally got the husband out and on the ground.
[01:23:28.280 --> 01:23:31.280]  Nobody got shot.
[01:23:31.280 --> 01:23:43.280]  This officer Hernandez put his pistol back in his holster and went back to being the kind of policeman you want the policeman to be right after a major gun scare.
[01:23:43.280 --> 01:23:45.280]  Ask her to get out.
[01:23:45.280 --> 01:23:46.280]  She did.
[01:23:46.280 --> 01:23:47.280]  He asked her to lay down.
[01:23:47.280 --> 01:23:48.280]  She did.
[01:23:48.280 --> 01:23:49.280]  He cuffed her.
[01:23:49.280 --> 01:23:50.280]  He helped.
[01:23:50.280 --> 01:23:51.280]  She helped her.
[01:23:51.280 --> 01:23:55.280]  He helped her up to her knees and then he helped her stand up.
[01:23:55.280 --> 01:23:56.280]  He didn't jerk her.
[01:23:56.280 --> 01:23:58.280]  He didn't jostle her around.
[01:23:58.280 --> 01:24:00.280]  These are all the things he was supposed to.
[01:24:00.280 --> 01:24:07.280]  And she's so fired up and people are not good at these situations.
[01:24:07.280 --> 01:24:10.280]  They don't do it often.
[01:24:10.280 --> 01:24:19.280]  Things can get, you know, she may have felt extremely stressed out and everything that occurred was blown up in her mind.
[01:24:19.280 --> 01:24:26.280]  So you have to get the whole story and just didn't listening to what you're saying about this guy.
[01:24:26.280 --> 01:24:30.280]  I'm beginning to wonder if we're getting the whole story.
[01:24:30.280 --> 01:24:34.280]  But when most of the time he doesn't give me the whole story.
[01:24:34.280 --> 01:24:37.280]  He has told me before when he's gone to her office.
[01:24:37.280 --> 01:24:42.280]  He's actually, you know, he paid her $100 to read this book and she never read it.
[01:24:42.280 --> 01:24:43.280]  He said, well, I'm always too kind.
[01:24:43.280 --> 01:24:46.280]  She says, oh, I need this money and I'll get this to you.
[01:24:46.280 --> 01:24:48.280]  And then she doesn't do it.
[01:24:48.280 --> 01:25:02.280]  He's always trying to get the attorneys on his side and be nice to them and say, you know, but then if I fast because they just take advantage of him and then he gets frustrated and angry because the courts are so against mortgages.
[01:25:02.280 --> 01:25:07.280]  But if he's to say anything and keep calm the night, what should he say to the judge?
[01:25:07.280 --> 01:25:10.280]  I'm okay if she withdraws.
[01:25:10.280 --> 01:25:15.280]  She's been a very ineffective counsel for me and has overcharged me.
[01:25:15.280 --> 01:25:24.280]  But I'm going to allow this withdrawal or is there something he can say to preserve his right to go after the counselor?
[01:25:24.280 --> 01:25:32.280]  The only thing he needs to say is that he objects to the judge interfering with his private contract.
[01:25:32.280 --> 01:25:34.280]  Okay.
[01:25:34.280 --> 01:25:43.280]  That'll give the put the judge on notice that you're aware that she is personally responsible for this behavior.
[01:25:43.280 --> 01:25:51.280]  Yes, she can allow him to withdraw, but you can also sue her for interfering with a private contract.
[01:25:51.280 --> 01:25:58.280]  Yeah, that's the only thing beyond that.
[01:25:58.280 --> 01:26:03.280]  Not knowing more about what's actually going on here.
[01:26:03.280 --> 01:26:08.280]  I would hate to advise him to do things that may not be warranted.
[01:26:08.280 --> 01:26:11.280]  He may be not be telling us everything.
[01:26:11.280 --> 01:26:12.280]  Yeah.
[01:26:12.280 --> 01:26:23.280]  So just tell him to be calm, just saying your honor, you know, I believe that you're not supposed to interfere with a private contract.
[01:26:23.280 --> 01:26:26.280]  I object to your interference with a private contract.
[01:26:26.280 --> 01:26:28.280]  I respectfully object.
[01:26:28.280 --> 01:26:30.280]  That's all he needs to do.
[01:26:30.280 --> 01:26:33.280]  And he has set the record.
[01:26:33.280 --> 01:26:37.280]  He's let her know that she's lining herself up to be sued.
[01:26:37.280 --> 01:26:40.280]  He doesn't need to go any further.
[01:26:40.280 --> 01:26:44.280]  Remember, never expect to win in the trial court.
[01:26:44.280 --> 01:26:47.280]  You're just setting the record for appeal.
[01:26:47.280 --> 01:26:48.280]  Yeah.
[01:26:48.280 --> 01:26:49.280]  Okay.
[01:26:49.280 --> 01:27:05.280]  And if she if she if the judge rules to remove her, the lawyer, then that's grounds for interlock for mandamus.
[01:27:05.280 --> 01:27:15.280]  Or an interlock toy, you can appeal to the appellate court to have them put the lawyer at your back.
[01:27:15.280 --> 01:27:16.280]  Okay.
[01:27:16.280 --> 01:27:23.280]  But if you're not, if the judge is upset at you and is going to rule against you, he's going to rule against you.
[01:27:23.280 --> 01:27:28.280]  There's not much you can do other than set the record.
[01:27:28.280 --> 01:27:29.280]  Okay.
[01:27:29.280 --> 01:27:35.280]  And he can just have caught a complaint to judge.
[01:27:35.280 --> 01:27:42.280]  But beyond that, I'm just at a point, I don't know what's going on here and something to me doesn't sound right.
[01:27:42.280 --> 01:27:43.280]  Yeah.
[01:27:43.280 --> 01:27:45.280]  Okay.
[01:27:45.280 --> 01:27:46.280]  Okay.
[01:27:46.280 --> 01:27:50.280]  Well, I will find out more.
[01:27:50.280 --> 01:27:52.280]  And then I'll let you know.
[01:27:52.280 --> 01:28:03.280]  The next question quickly is, I've got this hearing on the declaratory judgment, which they keep, you know, doing what they're doing it all about by Richard Akata.
[01:28:03.280 --> 01:28:12.280]  I got some help, found some people saying it's not boss by Richard Akata because I sent a letter after the old case was done.
[01:28:12.280 --> 01:28:15.280]  This is, as you say, the territory judgment.
[01:28:15.280 --> 01:28:19.280]  What is the, they're going to argue the same old thing.
[01:28:19.280 --> 01:28:27.280]  And they're going to say, does the judge, you know, check with.
[01:28:27.280 --> 01:28:31.280]  I feel she's not rocket science.
[01:28:31.280 --> 01:28:32.280]  Excuse me.
[01:28:32.280 --> 01:28:34.280]  This is not rocket science.
[01:28:34.280 --> 01:28:36.280]  There's only one issue before the court.
[01:28:36.280 --> 01:28:39.280]  All this other stuff is irrelevant.
[01:28:39.280 --> 01:28:41.280]  They wouldn't know what it has to argue.
[01:28:41.280 --> 01:28:46.280]  That's, this is really simple.
[01:28:46.280 --> 01:28:49.280]  Mm hmm.
[01:28:49.280 --> 01:28:52.280]  Okay.
[01:28:52.280 --> 01:28:55.280]  And they should, they should be pretty straightforward.
[01:28:55.280 --> 01:29:04.280]  Just do not let them lead you into arguing something that's irrelevant.
[01:29:04.280 --> 01:29:05.280]  Okay.
[01:29:05.280 --> 01:29:08.280]  And even if the judge tells you, well, I'm going to rule this.
[01:29:08.280 --> 01:29:10.280]  You don't care what she does.
[01:29:10.280 --> 01:29:18.280]  You're here just to set the record, you're not going to get drawn into arguing in a relevant issue before the court.
[01:29:18.280 --> 01:29:20.280]  You're just there to set the record.
[01:29:20.280 --> 01:29:22.280]  That's relevant.
[01:29:22.280 --> 01:29:30.280]  Except the one question before the court, which is, you know, is this what the statute.
[01:29:30.280 --> 01:29:43.280]  Clean language of the statute meant, and if the statute wanted to see legislative wanted to separate the difference between, you can only request this if you're not in foreclosure.
[01:29:43.280 --> 01:29:48.280]  When it really says, if the note was only satisfied.
[01:29:48.280 --> 01:29:52.280]  The note doesn't say anything about foreclosure.
[01:29:52.280 --> 01:29:56.280]  The law doesn't contemplate foreclosure.
[01:29:56.280 --> 01:29:57.280]  Hang on.
[01:29:57.280 --> 01:30:02.280]  We'll be right back.
[01:30:02.280 --> 01:30:10.280]  Reality TV, sugar, obesity, jet lag, the list of things that makes us dumber just keeps on growing.
[01:30:10.280 --> 01:30:13.280]  But now researchers say we can add stress to the list.
[01:30:13.280 --> 01:30:16.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:30:16.280 --> 01:30:18.280]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.280 --> 01:30:22.280]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.280 --> 01:30:27.280]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.280 --> 01:30:29.280]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:29.280 --> 01:30:33.280]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:33.280 --> 01:30:35.280]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.280 --> 01:30:42.280]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.280 --> 01:30:46.280]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.280 --> 01:30:49.280]  Are you always on the go and juggling multiple projects?
[01:30:49.280 --> 01:30:53.280]  If so, you might think that multitasking proves you're smart.
[01:30:53.280 --> 01:30:57.280]  But think again, all that stress might be eating your brain.
[01:30:57.280 --> 01:31:01.280]  A new study, Find Stress, reduces the number of connections between neurons,
[01:31:01.280 --> 01:31:04.280]  which actually makes it harder for people to manage problems.
[01:31:04.280 --> 01:31:11.280]  Researchers at Yale University found that stressed-out people have less gray matter in their prefrontal cortex.
[01:31:11.280 --> 01:31:16.280]  That's the part of the brain that helps us wake inflicting ideas and regulate our emotions.
[01:31:16.280 --> 01:31:21.280]  So take a deep breath and chill out. It'll help keep your mind as sharp as a tack.
[01:31:21.280 --> 01:31:27.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.280 --> 01:31:37.280]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:37.280 --> 01:31:39.280]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.280 --> 01:31:44.280]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.280 --> 01:31:47.280]  6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:47.280 --> 01:31:49.280]  1,000 of my fellow force responders are dying.
[01:31:49.280 --> 01:31:51.280]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.280 --> 01:31:52.280]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.280 --> 01:31:53.280]  I'm a New York City correctional officer.
[01:31:53.280 --> 01:31:54.280]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.280 --> 01:31:56.280]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.280 --> 01:31:58.280]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.280 --> 01:32:01.280]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:03.280 --> 01:32:06.280]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Center.
[01:32:06.280 --> 01:32:08.280]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[01:32:08.280 --> 01:32:13.280]  If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[01:32:13.280 --> 01:32:16.280]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[01:32:16.280 --> 01:32:20.280]  the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[01:32:20.280 --> 01:32:26.280]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[01:32:26.280 --> 01:32:29.280]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[01:32:29.280 --> 01:32:34.280]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is
[01:32:34.280 --> 01:32:36.280]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:36.280 --> 01:32:40.280]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com
[01:32:40.280 --> 01:32:41.280]  and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.280 --> 01:32:46.280]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie,
[01:32:46.280 --> 01:32:51.280]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.280 --> 01:32:55.280]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:32:55.280 --> 01:33:00.280]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:02.280 --> 01:33:05.280]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[01:33:05.280 --> 01:33:12.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:35.280 --> 01:33:42.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:42.280 --> 01:33:49.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:49.280 --> 01:33:57.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:57.280 --> 01:34:06.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:34:06.280 --> 01:34:08.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:34:08.280 --> 01:34:12.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:34:12.280 --> 01:34:17.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:34:17.280 --> 01:34:25.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:34:25.280 --> 01:34:32.880]  object, refuse to argue it, they will want to draw you into an argument that doesn't matter.
[01:34:35.280 --> 01:34:43.120]  And give the impression that you consent to this. Just object, object, object.
[01:34:43.120 --> 01:34:47.280]  One thing before the court, ask the court to rule on that and that's it.
[01:34:47.280 --> 01:34:53.920]  Okay. Okay, anything else Tina?
[01:34:53.920 --> 01:34:58.240]  No, anything else can wait for tomorrow night or next week.
[01:34:58.240 --> 01:35:05.520]  I've got a strange caller next, Ted from California.
[01:35:06.640 --> 01:35:08.720]  You might have heard us making jokes about him.
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:14.400]  Just hang on Tina, I'm going to bring you both in unless you're in a hurry.
[01:35:14.400 --> 01:35:18.000]  No, I'm not in a hurry. I'm just going to stop making dinner.
[01:35:19.280 --> 01:35:23.760]  Okay. Hello, Ted. Ted, are you dead?
[01:35:24.960 --> 01:35:27.760]  Hello, Randy, Brett, and Tina.
[01:35:30.480 --> 01:35:34.000]  Good evening. We were getting worried about you.
[01:35:37.040 --> 01:35:41.600]  The last time I had talked to you, you were going to court and you were afraid they were going to
[01:35:41.600 --> 01:35:44.480]  throw you in jail and then we didn't hear from you for a while.
[01:35:46.640 --> 01:35:55.040]  Well, I think that they may have planned that, but it didn't work out that way. I didn't give
[01:35:55.040 --> 01:36:01.120]  them what they wanted. But right off the bat, I'll tell you, the last hearing I went to,
[01:36:02.160 --> 01:36:08.160]  they've put the public defender on me. Okay. And so I'm arguing with them saying,
[01:36:08.160 --> 01:36:13.280]  no, I don't consent to that and no, I don't want the public defender. And so then they say,
[01:36:13.280 --> 01:36:17.280]  well, then you're representing yourself. And I said, no, I didn't say that either.
[01:36:18.160 --> 01:36:29.280]  And remember, I've already, this has now been going on for five years and over 102 hearings.
[01:36:29.280 --> 01:36:37.760]  Okay. So the main issue that I'm calling in about is that I want this public defender off
[01:36:37.760 --> 01:36:49.440]  of me. So I went ahead and filed a lawsuit against the public defender. And specifically,
[01:36:49.440 --> 01:36:57.280]  this deputy public defender is named. Okay. After I filed that lawsuit, we went back to court
[01:36:57.280 --> 01:37:04.960]  and the court is still acting as if this guy is representing me. I got a letter in the mail today
[01:37:05.520 --> 01:37:12.960]  from this public defender. He's, it's three pages long. He's misstating the case.
[01:37:14.720 --> 01:37:24.160]  And basically any interact, any time he calls me or, for example, this letter, it's terrorizing me.
[01:37:24.160 --> 01:37:32.800]  And the reason is because when somebody, basically he's, he's just an extension of the district
[01:37:32.800 --> 01:37:40.720]  attorney's office. It's all here. And I'm sitting here going, I have to say in court,
[01:37:40.720 --> 01:37:48.000]  this last court hearing, it was just on the radio, I'll say judge. Okay. But I don't call them judges.
[01:37:48.000 --> 01:37:56.320]  And so when the hearing was going on, they called the hearing. I got up there. I kept the public
[01:37:56.320 --> 01:38:03.520]  defender away from the microphone. I, and I spread out nice and wide. And then the judge called for
[01:38:03.520 --> 01:38:09.600]  the appearance from the district attorney's office. Well, the deputy DA prosecuting me was not there.
[01:38:09.600 --> 01:38:17.440]  And the woman that sits at a table there from the defense, from the DA's office, the judge looked at
[01:38:17.440 --> 01:38:27.600]  her, she declined to make the appearance for the DA's office. So besides suing the public defender,
[01:38:27.600 --> 01:38:38.720]  I've also filed a federal lawsuit just naming the deputy prosecutor. And it's a right over the
[01:38:38.720 --> 01:38:44.000]  and it's a writer review. It's not for monetary damages at this point. It's a writer review
[01:38:44.000 --> 01:38:49.520]  because I've discovered that they did not have a valid fourth amendment arrest warrant.
[01:38:50.240 --> 01:38:56.080]  They never have. And they've refused, they've refused for four and a half years to produce it.
[01:38:56.720 --> 01:39:03.600]  And a knee jerk response to my writ of habeas corpus, demanding that they bring it in,
[01:39:03.600 --> 01:39:10.000]  and cause them to bring in this phony document. It's one page. It's not a fourth amendment arrest
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:15.280]  warrant. There's no affidavit of probable cause attached to it. So back to this hearing, I'm
[01:39:15.280 --> 01:39:21.600]  saying some of this stuff, the judge knows some of it already. But I say Mr. Giffon, that's the judge.
[01:39:22.160 --> 01:39:28.240]  I say Mr. Giffon, he snaps back, judge, I'm a judge. I said, you're an administrator.
[01:39:28.240 --> 01:39:33.760]  And I've said it with that tone. And he didn't know what to do, the judge.
[01:39:35.120 --> 01:39:42.560]  And but he did go ahead. Oh, so back to this appearance thing. I got ahead of myself.
[01:39:43.760 --> 01:39:49.840]  First thing he called the case. And when the lady declined to sit in for the
[01:39:51.120 --> 01:39:57.200]  for the deputy DA that wasn't there, she then off, she got on her phone and called over, I guess.
[01:39:57.200 --> 01:40:03.440]  So they passed the case. They called the case back 30 minutes later and I stood up and I said all
[01:40:03.440 --> 01:40:12.480]  the stuff I just told you. And then the, but very interesting, again, this deputy DA that was there
[01:40:12.480 --> 01:40:17.680]  did not make the appearance. And that's, I want this to be very clear of what I'm going to say next.
[01:40:17.680 --> 01:40:26.480]  So I'm there. This public pretender is there. There's nobody appearing for the district attorneys
[01:40:26.480 --> 01:40:32.560]  office. Okay, hold on. Hold on. What was the purpose of the hearing?
[01:40:34.480 --> 01:40:38.720]  Well, it was scheduled as identification of counsel and trial set.
[01:40:40.880 --> 01:40:51.280]  So then, but then what happens is the judge gave this long diatribe and, you know,
[01:40:51.280 --> 01:40:58.080]  basically trying to get on the record of false statement of the case.
[01:40:58.800 --> 01:41:06.080]  I attempted to set that straight. He wouldn't let me. He asked the public pretender
[01:41:08.400 --> 01:41:15.520]  when he would be ready for trial. And the public pretender said April 6, the judge said,
[01:41:15.520 --> 01:41:22.720]  okay, set for trial April 6. I said, I object. I go, he does not represent me. And the judge says,
[01:41:22.720 --> 01:41:30.320]  well, then you represent, you're representing yourself. I said, no, no, I didn't say that.
[01:41:31.200 --> 01:41:38.480]  And I said, but I don't consent. And I object. This is, he doesn't represent me. I go for crying
[01:41:38.480 --> 01:41:47.200]  out loud. I'm suing him in Superior Court right now. And then, but coming away from all that,
[01:41:48.480 --> 01:41:55.520]  what's missing here? There was nobody prosecuting the case. No prosecutor was there.
[01:41:56.480 --> 01:41:58.880]  Yes, but this wasn't an adversarial hearing.
[01:42:00.560 --> 01:42:05.840]  But the judge, the judge, there's got, but if you're going to set a trial date,
[01:42:05.840 --> 01:42:12.560]  doesn't, don't you think I've never seen them set a trial date where the district attorney is not
[01:42:12.560 --> 01:42:21.600]  there agreeing to the trial date? Well, you got to know this is BS because they're doing that so
[01:42:21.600 --> 01:42:26.400]  that the prosecuting attorney can then object to the trial date and reset.
[01:42:29.040 --> 01:42:33.280]  This is all about forcing you back to court over and over and over.
[01:42:33.280 --> 01:42:39.440]  Well, they set the trial date for April 6th. And I got this near from this death,
[01:42:40.000 --> 01:42:46.080]  from this, from the public pretender today. And like I said, in the letter, three pages long,
[01:42:46.080 --> 01:42:50.640]  and he's, he's, he's totally misstating the situation.
[01:42:52.560 --> 01:42:57.920]  And he's saying that the house was not in my name at the time of the alleged recording of the
[01:42:57.920 --> 01:43:05.280]  quick claim D, which is absolutely false. It was, it was in my name. They want to ignore that.
[01:43:05.280 --> 01:43:12.480]  See, Randy? Look, what I, I'm terrified by the letter I read from this, this public pretender,
[01:43:13.120 --> 01:43:19.840]  because it's not, it's not the facts. It's not, it's not the case. And remember, I had a private
[01:43:19.840 --> 01:43:25.600]  attorney for a period of time and he sent correspondence to the DA's office telling them
[01:43:25.600 --> 01:43:31.600]  that, you know, look, this is, this is not a criminal offense. And that, you know, this is,
[01:43:31.600 --> 01:43:37.760]  I forgot what he said. It was nuances and so on. But given on the evidence that you currently have,
[01:43:38.320 --> 01:43:39.760]  this is not a chargeable offense.
[01:43:43.680 --> 01:43:50.160]  So they, and they know that they don't care. Hang on. Right. Back to go to our sponsors,
[01:43:50.160 --> 01:43:55.520]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain with the radio. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.320 --> 01:44:04.880]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[01:44:05.440 --> 01:44:11.040]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method. Michael Mearris has won six cases
[01:44:11.040 --> 01:44:15.840]  in federal court against debt collectors. And now you can win too. You'll get step by step
[01:44:15.840 --> 01:44:20.880]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[01:44:20.880 --> 01:44:26.560]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[01:44:26.560 --> 01:44:31.200]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them
[01:44:31.200 --> 01:44:37.280]  and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to
[01:44:37.280 --> 01:44:42.240]  stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more information,
[01:44:42.240 --> 01:44:47.840]  please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email Michael
[01:44:47.840 --> 01:44:57.360]  Mearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:44:57.360 --> 01:45:03.760]  to learn how to stop debt collectors next. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.320 --> 01:45:09.120]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to
[01:45:09.120 --> 01:45:17.120]  understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer,
[01:45:17.120 --> 01:45:22.080]  know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for
[01:45:22.080 --> 01:45:29.280]  yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was
[01:45:29.280 --> 01:45:35.760]  created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a
[01:45:35.760 --> 01:45:41.200]  lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[01:45:41.200 --> 01:45:48.080]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:48.080 --> 01:45:55.280]  forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:45:55.280 --> 01:46:06.800]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:25.280 --> 01:46:40.400]  Okay, we are back. Randy Carleton, rule of our radio. Brett Fountain, rule of our radio.
[01:46:42.000 --> 01:46:48.160]  Ted Scarlett, I'm getting confused. We're back. Okay, Ted.
[01:46:48.160 --> 01:47:02.080]  So, Randy, the last thing is in September of last year, just doing some cleanup and thanks to my
[01:47:02.080 --> 01:47:08.320]  friend, we filed a bar complaint against the public defender's office. I lined out in the
[01:47:08.320 --> 01:47:14.640]  complaint all the things they did not do, which was basically they did nothing. They didn't secure an
[01:47:14.640 --> 01:47:21.600]  expert witness. They didn't secure evidence. They didn't so many things. Okay, and I put that in a
[01:47:21.600 --> 01:47:28.560]  bar complaint in September last year. And at that time, I had no lawyer. I was going to hearings,
[01:47:28.560 --> 01:47:34.560]  no lawyer. So, late November, early December, all of a sudden, a public defender comes in. So,
[01:47:34.560 --> 01:47:42.160]  last week, I filed new bar complaints against the public defender. And when I say public defender,
[01:47:42.160 --> 01:47:48.240]  I'm talking Molly O'Neill, who runs the public defender's office. And the deputy public defender,
[01:47:49.040 --> 01:47:55.040]  Gregory Goldman. I just filed new complaints against both of them. And I say they are retaliating
[01:47:55.680 --> 01:48:03.680]  against me for filing the bar complaint in September. And they're retaliating by now trespassing
[01:48:03.680 --> 01:48:11.520]  and entering my case, interfering to ensure a conviction in retaliation for my bar complaint
[01:48:11.520 --> 01:48:19.840]  in September. And the bar told me on the phone that they were going to send them warning letters.
[01:48:21.520 --> 01:48:27.600]  And then I'm going to wait a little bit, a few more days, and I'm going to
[01:48:27.600 --> 01:48:34.880]  then send them more notice. First off, this letter I just got, I'm going to tell them I served him
[01:48:34.880 --> 01:48:46.720]  in court on the record, notice of cease and desist trespass. And now he's calling me and sending
[01:48:46.720 --> 01:48:55.840]  me a letter. And he's terrorizing me. And I'm suing him. If I'm suing somebody and he is
[01:48:55.840 --> 01:49:04.000]  represented by a lawyer, I can't talk to him directly, can I? So, how the hell can he represent me?
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:12.800]  I think I got him in a real pickle. It's been hard for me. Okay. What about the federal courts?
[01:49:15.360 --> 01:49:19.280]  Well, the problem is the judges up there are bad too.
[01:49:20.640 --> 01:49:22.320]  To file in D.C.
[01:49:22.320 --> 01:49:33.760]  The good news is, Trump appointed the U.S. Attorney for Northern California.
[01:49:33.760 --> 01:49:38.640]  I've got that guy's name. I'm getting everything together to go get it to him.
[01:49:40.800 --> 01:49:47.360]  Oh, good. He just got appointed. He might want to make a name for himself.
[01:49:47.360 --> 01:49:53.120]  And if he doesn't do something with my complaints, I'm going to tell him that I'm going to be getting
[01:49:53.120 --> 01:50:03.760]  in touch with his boss. Exactly. President Trump is, and by the way, it's in the news right now,
[01:50:03.760 --> 01:50:12.960]  William Barr is pissed off about all the sanctuary cities and he's come out and said that they're
[01:50:12.960 --> 01:50:18.000]  striking at the root of law enforcement with this and that it's causing more crime. It's not less
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:24.080]  crime with these policies and that they're breaking the law by doing this stuff. Well,
[01:50:24.080 --> 01:50:33.680]  I had heard, I don't have it on absolute authority, but it seems like Trump had made some kind of
[01:50:33.680 --> 01:50:43.440]  targeted keyboarder or something stating that these sanctuary cities were liable for harm to
[01:50:43.440 --> 01:50:51.360]  citizens by these illegal aliens. Well, that's good, Randy, because that's how all my problems
[01:50:51.360 --> 01:50:58.480]  started. I don't know if I ever told you how my problems started. I'm in my home and at that time,
[01:50:58.480 --> 01:51:06.640]  like 28 years, and I was attacked and almost murdered by two illegal aliens and that's what
[01:51:06.640 --> 01:51:17.120]  caused my financial problems. And there was reluctance to do anything to even prosecute those
[01:51:17.120 --> 01:51:24.640]  people and after a year, I had a lawyer write a letter to the DA and there were eyewitnesses
[01:51:24.640 --> 01:51:30.160]  and one of those eyewitnesses was a county employee. She's standing in her driveway and
[01:51:30.160 --> 01:51:40.400]  watched these people trying to murder me. So, it finally got prosecuted and the whole thing got
[01:51:40.400 --> 01:51:46.640]  botched. I mean, they ended up getting, they took a deal for assault with a deadly weapon,
[01:51:46.640 --> 01:51:56.800]  but the fact is, I was damaged. They almost broke my jaw. They broke my teeth. I had nerve
[01:51:56.800 --> 01:52:02.320]  damage and everything else. So, I couldn't work for over a year and that's how I got in financial
[01:52:02.320 --> 01:52:07.680]  trouble in the first place. So, here you have something. This is a story. This is a story
[01:52:07.680 --> 01:52:14.240]  over and over again. Luckily, they didn't attack me with a knife, but they did try to strangle
[01:52:14.240 --> 01:52:23.360]  me to death and like all the damages, but here you have another story. I'm a man who's worked my
[01:52:23.360 --> 01:52:31.760]  whole life. I've been in my home almost 30 years and I lose everything because of two illegal aliens.
[01:52:33.920 --> 01:52:39.440]  This is a good story for Trump. Have you tried to get old of him yet?
[01:52:39.440 --> 01:52:51.040]  No. I'm going to start trying to communicate with him through Twitter. He does read that
[01:52:51.040 --> 01:52:58.960]  and I also, by using this U.S. attorney. Again, these politicians in California,
[01:52:58.960 --> 01:53:05.120]  they give all the flip service to everything. It's clearer than ever.
[01:53:05.120 --> 01:53:15.360]  California has become the Titanic. It's horrible here. It's horrible. This is modern
[01:53:15.360 --> 01:53:22.000]  capitalism. I've always been saying that everywhere I go, people tell me that,
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:29.440]  oh, my county is the most corrupt county in the nation, but now I'm beginning to say that
[01:53:29.440 --> 01:53:35.760]  California is the most corrupt state in the nation. I used to say they were all the same, but
[01:53:36.400 --> 01:53:44.880]  no, California's got to be the worst. This is what socialism gets you.
[01:53:46.560 --> 01:53:52.240]  Absolutely. Here's the problem we have out here. The people that you're supposed to go
[01:53:52.240 --> 01:54:01.120]  tell on these people, they're all in it. They're all in cahoots. Like I've described in the past
[01:54:01.120 --> 01:54:07.040]  about the courts when I said again tonight, the judges in the San Jose federal court used to be
[01:54:07.680 --> 01:54:18.800]  superior court judges in Santa Clara County. Lucy Cole, she started out back in D.C.
[01:54:18.800 --> 01:54:26.400]  Lucy, she gave a million dollars to Obama's reelection campaign, and after he got reelected,
[01:54:26.400 --> 01:54:34.480]  he immediately appointed her a federal judge. Her husband is a green card Mexican,
[01:54:35.680 --> 01:54:37.920]  and he's on the California Supreme Court.
[01:54:37.920 --> 01:54:46.400]  I don't know the law concerning that.
[01:54:53.120 --> 01:54:55.360]  Can a non-citizen be on the Supreme?
[01:54:56.960 --> 01:55:06.640]  Well, technically, a green card, it gives you a status, but the point being is-
[01:55:06.640 --> 01:55:08.560]  But is it the citizen status?
[01:55:10.640 --> 01:55:13.840]  Well, I forget what green card actually is. You're a-
[01:55:16.240 --> 01:55:27.360]  Yeah, you're legit. You could work. You haven't gone and done your citizenship, but you have status.
[01:55:27.360 --> 01:55:36.000]  I don't know. That's what I'm saying. Okay, that's probably a question that's not relevant to this
[01:55:37.920 --> 01:55:43.120]  issue, but the citizen status is different than green card status.
[01:55:45.360 --> 01:55:49.360]  Exactly. Can someone with the green card vote?
[01:55:51.360 --> 01:55:54.800]  I was going to say that as well, but the main reason I called is,
[01:55:54.800 --> 01:55:59.520]  I don't know what else to do to get this public pretender off of me.
[01:56:01.600 --> 01:56:04.640]  File federal charges against him for denial of due process.
[01:56:07.360 --> 01:56:07.360]  Okay.
[01:56:07.360 --> 01:56:11.840]  You've got a new U.S. attorney filed with a new U.S. attorney.
[01:56:14.800 --> 01:56:18.880]  Well, I found out all these- I've been talking to Dr. Richard Fine,
[01:56:18.880 --> 01:56:27.760]  and there's- it gets very- you know, the law gets very technical, but the bottom line is
[01:56:28.720 --> 01:56:35.200]  civilly, these judges who have all accepted money from the county, none of them can preside on my case.
[01:56:36.560 --> 01:56:43.760]  Okay, they're supposed to- they're disqualified, but Dr. Fine's also saying that they're violating
[01:56:43.760 --> 01:56:50.800]  federal law, and this U.S. attorney could take every one of these judges and prosecute them
[01:56:50.800 --> 01:56:53.520]  criminally for accepting that money from the county.
[01:56:55.760 --> 01:57:00.880]  Your case would be a good case in point as to why he should do that.
[01:57:03.680 --> 01:57:04.000]  Yes.
[01:57:06.640 --> 01:57:12.560]  Look at the abuse. You know, you're supposed to go to- you have the right to go to trial within
[01:57:12.560 --> 01:57:24.080]  60 days, okay, unless you waive that. But look at this abuse, okay, five years, like 102 or 103 hearings.
[01:57:25.760 --> 01:57:27.920]  I mean, this is just- this is just malicious.
[01:57:29.840 --> 01:57:36.240]  So, get it to this U.S. attorney. If he's just in, he- and you give him a good, strong case,
[01:57:36.240 --> 01:57:37.600]  he can make a name for himself.
[01:57:37.600 --> 01:57:47.680]  Yeah, I'm- I'm putting it together. I've been working on trying to get this public defender
[01:57:47.680 --> 01:57:54.800]  off of me, and I've even got- I also wrote in my complaint to the bar that not only did I
[01:57:54.800 --> 01:57:59.040]  file the bar complaint, but I've also been going to the county board of supervisor meetings
[01:57:59.040 --> 01:58:07.360]  and- and complaining. And so, that's why they're retaliating. So, anyways, I don't know,
[01:58:07.360 --> 01:58:10.400]  is there anything else I can do other than what we've talked about?
[01:58:11.600 --> 01:58:15.360]  Yeah, I would go to the U.S. attorney, ask him what you can do.
[01:58:18.160 --> 01:58:18.640]  Sounds good.
[01:58:19.680 --> 01:58:24.560]  You gotta- it's just politics. Everything is political. You got a new guy in. He's gonna want-
[01:58:24.560 --> 01:58:29.840]  gonna want to make a name for himself. Where else can he find someone who's been to court
[01:58:29.840 --> 01:58:37.440]  over a hundred times for a non-crime? Okay, we are out of time. Thank you, Ted.
[01:58:38.080 --> 01:58:44.640]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain. We'll be back tomorrow night at our- for our four-hour info
[01:58:44.640 --> 01:58:48.160]  marathon. Thank you all for listening, and good night.
[01:58:48.160 --> 01:58:57.040]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:57.040 --> 01:59:02.480]  Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.480 --> 01:59:08.560]  what the Bible says, verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.560 --> 01:59:16.880]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll-free at 888-551-0102,
[01:59:16.880 --> 01:59:25.200]  or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000
[01:59:25.200 --> 01:59:30.960]  cross-references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is
[01:59:30.960 --> 01:59:36.080]  truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:36.080 --> 01:59:49.360]  call us toll-free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.360 --> 02:00:04.640]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.