[00:00.000 --> 00:06.900]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star of Lowdown.
[00:06.900 --> 00:14.220]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 open with Precious Metals, Gold $1,429.00, Silver
[00:14.220 --> 00:24.300]  $16.45.00, Copper $2.75.00, Oil, Texas Crude $55.63.00, Brent Crude $62.47.00 and Cryptos
[00:24.300 --> 00:35.320]  an Order of Market Cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin
[00:35.320 --> 00:42.680]  $100.31 and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a Crypto Coin.
[00:42.680 --> 00:52.580]  In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a timed suitcase bomb was detonated
[00:52.580 --> 00:57.900]  on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I preparedness day parade, killing
[00:57.900 --> 01:04.940]  10 and injuring 40 today in history.
[01:04.940 --> 01:09.580]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing Hemp and
[01:09.580 --> 01:14.340]  attacks his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin,
[01:14.340 --> 01:19.020]  San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones
[01:19.020 --> 01:23.020]  since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to
[01:23.020 --> 01:24.860]  test the year for THC.
[01:24.860 --> 01:28.620]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier this month that
[01:28.620 --> 01:33.180]  she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the
[01:33.180 --> 01:34.180]  law.
[01:34.180 --> 01:37.780]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General stipulated in a letter
[01:37.780 --> 01:42.300]  to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized
[01:42.300 --> 01:48.460]  in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as
[01:48.460 --> 01:54.660]  well as other cities too, like the District Attorney in El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat
[01:54.660 --> 01:59.140]  who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the
[01:59.140 --> 02:01.900]  prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[02:01.900 --> 02:06.940]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender
[02:06.940 --> 02:10.940]  in Harris County who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes
[02:10.940 --> 02:13.660]  something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.660 --> 02:17.540]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're
[02:17.540 --> 02:22.740]  charged with.
[02:22.740 --> 02:27.580]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark.
[02:27.580 --> 02:32.500]  As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket
[02:32.500 --> 02:38.180]  shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East
[02:38.180 --> 02:39.660]  Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.660 --> 02:43.940]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near
[02:43.940 --> 02:50.220]  its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the
[02:50.220 --> 03:20.020]  clothe.
[03:20.020 --> 03:46.900]  Good evening folks, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie
[03:46.900 --> 03:51.940]  Craig and it's February 3rd, 2020.
[03:51.940 --> 03:58.580]  We are live tonight, this is not our archive or any other time that I call you.
[03:58.580 --> 04:03.580]  Now I'm gonna go ahead and open up the phone board and y'all can go ahead and call and
[04:03.580 --> 04:07.380]  get in line but before I actually start taking calls there's something I want to go into
[04:07.380 --> 04:09.900]  real quick.
[04:09.900 --> 04:16.020]  Now there is this woman out there who calls herself Snoop 4 Truth and she used the number
[04:16.020 --> 04:21.540]  4 in that center part there and she thinks that she knows what's going on in the world
[04:21.540 --> 04:25.540]  of law and what the court cases all say and blah, blah, blah.
[04:25.540 --> 04:27.260]  She doesn't.
[04:27.260 --> 04:34.340]  She runs this website called Project Avalon where she tries to debunk anyone that's talking
[04:34.340 --> 04:40.020]  against the status quo of things, myself included.
[04:40.020 --> 04:43.660]  She calls it the Eddie Craig Right to Travel hoax.
[04:43.660 --> 04:47.900]  Now anyone who's listened to this show or to me for any length of time knows that I
[04:47.900 --> 04:53.060]  have said time and time again that the right to travel is not the issue here.
[04:53.060 --> 04:56.780]  It has never been the issue here.
[04:56.780 --> 05:06.140]  No one and I repeat, no one is trying to charge you with a violation of the right to travel.
[05:06.140 --> 05:12.740]  Now as luck would have it, someone posted a recording of their appearance in court the
[05:12.740 --> 05:15.820]  other day doing some stupid patronut stuff.
[05:15.820 --> 05:20.020]  Don't get me wrong, it was a patronut doing it but they were recording the proceedings
[05:20.020 --> 05:23.780]  which at least was one thing they were doing intelligently.
[05:23.780 --> 05:31.860]  And in those proceedings, the judge herself says exactly those words.
[05:31.860 --> 05:35.900]  This guy is going on and on trying to cross-examine the cop.
[05:35.900 --> 05:40.540]  Do you agree that there's a right to travel and the prosecutor is objecting to it?
[05:40.540 --> 05:47.500]  Because it's irrelevant to the charges against you people, stop bringing it up.
[05:47.500 --> 05:55.180]  It's not the issue here and the judge herself, in my words, exactly repeated, no one is charging
[05:55.180 --> 05:59.100]  you with a violation of the right to travel.
[05:59.100 --> 06:05.820]  So how on the money have I been for years saying exactly that same thing?
[06:05.820 --> 06:10.820]  That's the only time that the courts and I have actually agreed on anything.
[06:10.820 --> 06:19.740]  Now what this woman snoop for truth thinks she's done is expose my efforts to get the
[06:19.740 --> 06:25.860]  transportation code overturned as being unconstitutional in its application and overturned as being
[06:25.860 --> 06:30.980]  unconstitutional because it was illegally enacted under our Constitution.
[06:30.980 --> 06:37.260]  This law, very clearly, if you know all the parts to put together, leaves no doubt that
[06:37.260 --> 06:40.980]  this is dealing with commerce and nothing else.
[06:40.980 --> 06:46.180]  It has no effect and no application to the private people of Texas never has.
[06:46.180 --> 06:48.060]  The law says that.
[06:48.060 --> 06:52.580]  However, the court opinions say something completely different.
[06:52.580 --> 06:58.860]  And the reason for that is and the thing that she is promoting by doing what she does is
[06:58.860 --> 07:04.700]  that the courts are playing word games using legal semantics.
[07:04.700 --> 07:10.900]  For lack of a better way to put it, it is fraud through terminology.
[07:10.900 --> 07:18.460]  They are using the terminology of the statutes and applying them to subject matter that is
[07:18.460 --> 07:25.980]  outside of the enacted legislative subject matter jurisdiction of the code itself as
[07:25.980 --> 07:32.180]  if they are one and the same and they are not.
[07:32.180 --> 07:40.220]  Me going to and from any place in my car is not an act of transportation, has nothing
[07:40.220 --> 07:49.700]  to do with transportation, never had anything to do with transportation.
[07:49.700 --> 07:55.860]  But by saying that I am in a motor vehicle without any evidence of transportation, the
[07:55.860 --> 08:00.500]  state is attempting to draw me within the confines and jurisdiction of the subject matter of
[08:00.500 --> 08:08.860]  the transportation code using nothing more than legal semantics, but no actual evidence.
[08:08.860 --> 08:15.020]  They have no evidence it was being used as a motor vehicle, none, because they lack any
[08:15.020 --> 08:17.500]  evidence of transportation.
[08:17.500 --> 08:25.260]  The single subject matter that controls the application of that code.
[08:25.260 --> 08:27.260]  Now this woman snooped for truth.
[08:27.260 --> 08:32.300]  She threw all kinds of court cases at me that I have seen a thousand times before from every
[08:32.300 --> 08:38.100]  state of the union and just like the right to travel argument in the court, her case
[08:38.100 --> 08:43.580]  law is absolutely irrelevant to what I discuss and why I discuss it.
[08:43.580 --> 08:44.580]  Absolutely irrelevant.
[08:44.580 --> 08:47.980]  Why, because it is doing exactly the same thing.
[08:47.980 --> 08:56.500]  It is using deception of terminology to insinuate an application that legally it cannot possibly
[08:56.500 --> 09:00.540]  have and remain constitutional.
[09:00.540 --> 09:02.860]  Can't do it.
[09:02.860 --> 09:07.020]  Article 3, section 35, Texas Constitution.
[09:07.020 --> 09:13.140]  No bill shall contain more than one subject and the subject of all bills shall be stated
[09:13.140 --> 09:19.300]  in its title to provide proper notice to the legislature and to the public what the bill
[09:19.300 --> 09:22.860]  is for.
[09:22.860 --> 09:31.300]  The title of SB 971 specifically says every statute in that code is relative to the subject
[09:31.300 --> 09:35.380]  matter of transportation.
[09:35.380 --> 09:40.780]  Hence the third court of appeals declaration that transportation is just a word in the
[09:40.780 --> 09:50.820]  title of the code is inaccurate, it is incorrect, it is judicial fraud because it is not the
[09:50.820 --> 09:53.060]  sole purpose of the term.
[09:53.060 --> 10:01.020]  It is the single subject matter that the code itself is limited to according to the actual
[10:01.020 --> 10:08.660]  enrolled bill which is the actual law not the statutes.
[10:08.660 --> 10:16.940]  When the statutes do not comport themselves with the enrolled bill, the statutes are invalid.
[10:16.940 --> 10:23.180]  End of discussion, the enrolled bill is the law.
[10:23.180 --> 10:31.740]  The law says the subject matter of the transportation code is limited to that of transportation.
[10:31.740 --> 10:40.380]  It does not provide us with one, a definition of transportation that is, but the government
[10:40.380 --> 10:48.500]  code does tell us in chapters 311 and 312 how such terms of art are to be read and interpreted
[10:48.500 --> 10:54.180]  by the courts, by the executive, and by the legislature.
[10:54.180 --> 11:03.060]  They are to be interpreted and read and construed in the same meaning as given to it by those
[11:03.060 --> 11:08.940]  in the art, profession, or occupation to which it applies.
[11:08.940 --> 11:14.580]  Art, profession, or occupation, get it?
[11:14.580 --> 11:18.260]  You're going to and from the grocery store is not an occupation.
[11:18.260 --> 11:25.300]  You're going to and from work, the travel itself is not a profession or an occupation.
[11:25.300 --> 11:30.140]  What you're doing once you get there is a different story, but on your way back and
[11:30.140 --> 11:34.140]  forth it's irrelevant.
[11:34.140 --> 11:39.420]  It is nor is it an art.
[11:39.420 --> 11:44.140]  So right there the rules of statutory construction and the writing of laws in chapters 311 and
[11:44.140 --> 11:49.220]  312 of the Texas government code makes it very clear the Third Court of Appeals went
[11:49.220 --> 11:56.820]  way off the reservation to make a declaration of law that they had no legal basis to make,
[11:56.820 --> 11:57.820]  none.
[11:57.820 --> 12:01.740]  But every court in Texas has done this for decades.
[12:01.740 --> 12:08.140]  They have applied the statutes in a way that makes the statute itself into an independent
[12:08.140 --> 12:14.120]  subject, separate and apart from the subject matter of the code.
[12:14.120 --> 12:18.900]  And that too is unconstitutional.
[12:18.900 --> 12:24.340]  So Ms. Snoop for truth, I don't know what you hope to accomplish other than just to
[12:24.340 --> 12:30.940]  maintain the status quo for the powers that be, but until you rebut my actual research
[12:30.940 --> 12:37.540]  on the actual law and the actual history of that law, rather than how the courts are misrepresenting
[12:37.540 --> 12:42.940]  what that law says and means, you don't have a leg to stand on in arguing with me and you
[12:42.940 --> 12:45.020]  never will.
[12:45.020 --> 12:50.460]  A face-to-face debate on this subject will see you burning in a heap on the ground before
[12:50.460 --> 12:54.060]  you can finish your last teardrop.
[12:54.060 --> 13:00.460]  I promise you it will because all you can throw at me are court opinions that are irrelevant
[13:00.460 --> 13:07.420]  to Texas law, period.
[13:07.420 --> 13:12.180]  Anyone that listens to this show knows that when I tell you to go look at something, I
[13:12.180 --> 13:15.700]  tell you exactly where to find it.
[13:15.700 --> 13:20.740]  And when I tell you where to find it, my expectation is is you will do your own due diligence and
[13:20.740 --> 13:26.860]  go look it up for yourself and verify that I was right.
[13:26.860 --> 13:33.460]  When you connect all of the dots in the various places they exist within the Texas codes,
[13:33.460 --> 13:40.220]  there is no way to come to the conclusion that the private citizen is subject to the
[13:40.220 --> 13:43.020]  transportation code and the statutes in it.
[13:43.020 --> 13:46.020]  There is no way whatsoever.
[13:46.020 --> 13:50.620]  But in order to come to that conclusion, there are some things that you must understand.
[13:50.620 --> 13:55.180]  You must understand how to read and interpret statutes, which chapters 311 and 312 tell
[13:55.180 --> 13:56.420]  us how to do.
[13:56.420 --> 14:00.740]  You must understand how the legislature is required to write law, which chapters 311
[14:00.740 --> 14:03.420]  and 312 tell us how they're supposed to do that.
[14:03.420 --> 14:07.780]  The legislative drafting manual also tells us how they're supposed to do that.
[14:07.780 --> 14:11.980]  The legislative drafting manual brings to clarification, for instance, that the term
[14:11.980 --> 14:18.220]  person by default, as does chapter 311 definition of person, by the way, which is generally
[14:18.220 --> 14:25.700]  applicable to every code unless that code has its own local definition, means a fictional
[14:25.700 --> 14:27.340]  legal entity.
[14:27.340 --> 14:33.700]  Does not mean an individual person, living person, that is.
[14:33.700 --> 14:37.740]  Doesn't mean one at all, never has.
[14:37.740 --> 14:43.940]  When it goes to the use of the term individual in those statutes, an individual can engage
[14:43.940 --> 14:47.420]  in transportation just like a corporation can.
[14:47.420 --> 14:54.940]  In fact, an individual is required to be acting when a corporation engages in such activities
[14:54.940 --> 14:59.820]  because the corporation can't drive a truck, it can't press a gas pedal, it can't step
[14:59.820 --> 15:01.700]  on a brake.
[15:01.700 --> 15:06.140]  That takes someone that breathes air, okay?
[15:06.140 --> 15:09.940]  Yes, of course, it's a remote-controlled car, and then there's still going to be somebody
[15:09.940 --> 15:14.300]  somewhere monitoring something about it.
[15:14.300 --> 15:21.420]  The point is, is that the legal terminology is what is being used to deceive the public,
[15:21.420 --> 15:26.860]  and that terminology is what comprises the court opinions she is relying on.
[15:26.860 --> 15:36.620]  Hence, they are wrong because the terminology is being applied to subjects outside of the
[15:36.620 --> 15:41.660]  actual legislative subject matter, okay?
[15:41.660 --> 15:49.780]  My automobile is not a motor vehicle until I am using it to engage in transportation.
[15:49.780 --> 15:56.380]  At which point, I better have a license and my automobile must be registered and licensed
[15:56.380 --> 16:00.620]  as a motor vehicle to engage in that activity.
[16:00.620 --> 16:06.460]  But until I do that, those licenses are irrelevant to me.
[16:06.460 --> 16:14.100]  They have nothing to do with me and what I'm doing, never had, never will.
[16:14.100 --> 16:17.740]  This is fraud.
[16:17.740 --> 16:20.780]  It's judicial fraud.
[16:20.780 --> 16:29.420]  It is the way the game has been rigged to use similar terms to common terms, but with different
[16:29.420 --> 16:36.860]  meanings, and with a different subject matter context to which those meanings must be limited.
[16:36.860 --> 16:42.020]  Something that the courts are ignoring in every single case they decide.
[16:42.020 --> 16:48.980]  They are throwing the subject matter requirement of the code out of the window, and just going
[16:48.980 --> 16:53.540]  with the statute's individual is if they are subjects under themselves.
[16:53.540 --> 16:55.740]  That's judicial fraud.
[16:55.740 --> 16:57.420]  We'll be right back.
[16:57.420 --> 17:09.980]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[17:09.980 --> 17:10.980]  Gun Works.
[17:10.980 --> 17:14.620]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:14.620 --> 17:16.420]  Any amount is appreciated.
[17:16.420 --> 17:18.260]  Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[17:18.260 --> 17:24.700]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR 15.
[17:24.700 --> 17:27.260]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:27.260 --> 17:30.460]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:30.460 --> 17:36.020]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[17:36.020 --> 17:39.740]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[17:39.740 --> 17:44.340]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can
[17:44.340 --> 17:48.700]  keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[17:48.700 --> 17:54.740]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, and remember, every $25 donation is a chance
[17:54.740 --> 17:55.740]  to win.
[17:55.740 --> 18:00.820]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.820 --> 18:06.140]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:06.140 --> 18:09.580]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meares proven method.
[18:09.580 --> 18:13.940]  Michael Meares has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.940 --> 18:14.940]  can win two.
[18:14.940 --> 18:19.780]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.780 --> 18:25.220]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[18:25.220 --> 18:29.700]  answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports,
[18:29.700 --> 18:34.380]  how to turn the financial tables on them, and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.380 --> 18:39.500]  The Michael Meares proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.500 --> 18:41.620]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.620 --> 18:47.220]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meares banner
[18:47.220 --> 18:50.180]  or email Michael Meares at yahoo.com.
[18:50.180 --> 18:59.740]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.740 --> 19:00.740]  next.
[19:00.740 --> 19:12.100]  If you're listening to the Logos Radio Network, the Logos Radio Network is at yahoo.com.
[19:12.100 --> 19:31.620]  The Logos Radio Network is at yahoo.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[19:31.620 --> 19:58.620]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[19:58.620 --> 20:17.140]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[20:17.140 --> 20:40.380]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[20:40.380 --> 21:08.000]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[21:08.000 --> 21:13.840]  the fact that you're just a member of the status quo. You want to keep things
[21:13.840 --> 21:20.880]  as they are no matter how wrong they are. That's what you're exposing. So good
[21:20.880 --> 21:26.520]  luck with that. All right that said let's start with our callers first one and
[21:26.520 --> 21:33.320]  only one up at the moment is Tyler in Wyoming. Tyler what do you got? It's good
[21:33.320 --> 21:38.480]  to talk to you again and he had lost your phone number. I had my phone stolen so
[21:38.480 --> 21:46.960]  I couldn't call you. I got stopped the other day by the sheriff's department and
[21:46.960 --> 21:54.800]  I already have a case going on in the the city for a similar charge. The city
[21:54.800 --> 22:01.600]  had stopped me about two months prior for it was irrelevant of a traffic stop.
[22:01.600 --> 22:06.000]  They were doing an investigation on something else but they noticed that I
[22:06.000 --> 22:11.800]  didn't have a... I just bought an automobile, private automobile and had the
[22:11.800 --> 22:18.680]  bill say on the window but he asked you know for my license and registration.
[22:18.680 --> 22:25.240]  Sheriff's office did the other day and I said well I'm not in transportation.
[22:25.240 --> 22:31.120]  That's the first thing I told him and he just acted like I didn't say anything. He
[22:31.120 --> 22:35.960]  goes sir I need a driver's license from you. I said I'm just honest with him. I
[22:35.960 --> 22:40.600]  said I'm not driving and he goes what do you mean you're not driving? He goes aren't you behind the wheel of vehicles?
[22:40.600 --> 22:47.800]  I said no. I said it's not a vehicle and at this point he started getting I rate
[22:47.800 --> 22:53.320]  started yelling at me and I was going to ask you actually he's getting really
[22:53.320 --> 22:59.760]  intimidating and yelling and I thought he was going to insinuate or commit an
[22:59.760 --> 23:02.880]  act of violence. I didn't know what he was doing by his actions but he was
[23:02.880 --> 23:07.920]  intimidating me and he asked for the key. I asked him why he needed the key and he
[23:07.920 --> 23:12.640]  didn't tell him. He just said give me the key. So I did. I complied just out of fear
[23:12.640 --> 23:17.840]  and gave him the key. I wasn't going to take off or anything on him of course and
[23:17.840 --> 23:25.120]  then he took my key and he went back apparently called for backup and then he
[23:25.120 --> 23:29.920]  came back to the window and he started his same thing. He says you don't have a
[23:29.920 --> 23:34.120]  plate either. You don't have a date on the bill of sale. You don't have anything.
[23:34.120 --> 23:38.800]  I said well officer I said I explained again. I'm not I'm not any any form of
[23:38.800 --> 23:43.480]  transportation. He goes what are you doing then? He goes on my roads. It's kind of
[23:43.480 --> 23:50.200]  like that. I said well I'm just I'm just traveling. I'm just a mere traveler and
[23:50.200 --> 23:55.400]  at that point backup arrived and he he wasn't listening to anything I was saying
[23:55.400 --> 24:00.480]  just getting a rate and I was actually glad to see the backup because he was the
[24:00.480 --> 24:07.360]  guy just that never been so intimidated by a public official before. But when they
[24:07.360 --> 24:12.080]  arrived I just tried to explain. One gal asked me she's like what what's the
[24:12.080 --> 24:15.000]  difference? What are you trying to explain here? She's like what what do you mean
[24:15.000 --> 24:19.840]  you're just traveling? Aren't you driving? So I try I know you're not supposed to
[24:19.840 --> 24:23.520]  educate them. It ain't gonna do any good but I just briefly went through it. It's one thing if
[24:23.520 --> 24:27.240]  they're asking you to educate them. It's another thing when they're doing what the
[24:27.240 --> 24:31.400]  first cop is doing and you're still trying to educate them. That's the
[24:31.400 --> 24:37.520]  distinction here. All right well what I was going to ask is because of his
[24:37.520 --> 24:45.920]  behavior I had I was going to file a please conduct complaint report with
[24:45.920 --> 24:50.160]  that department and possibly with the county attorney. I was going to ask if
[24:50.160 --> 24:54.640]  that would do any good or if that's just you know. Well I guess it depends on what
[24:54.640 --> 25:02.960]  you mean by any good. Were they wearing body cameras? Yeah he was
[25:02.960 --> 25:08.920]  wearing a body camera. Okay then what you need to do is make specific note of the
[25:08.920 --> 25:14.600]  date and the time and if you make your complaint make a specific reference to
[25:14.600 --> 25:17.840]  the date and time that the fact that the officer was wearing a body camera that
[25:17.840 --> 25:22.120]  did appear to be on and therefore you would like its contents for that that
[25:22.120 --> 25:32.520]  stop reviewed. Okay but I can do that. Now keep this in mind here's the problem did
[25:32.520 --> 25:38.280]  they get your information? No I gave him nothing the only thing I gave him was my
[25:38.280 --> 25:42.080]  name because I had heard that there was a Supreme Court case said that you need
[25:42.080 --> 25:50.040]  least need to give him your name so I did give him my name. Okay and you didn't
[25:50.040 --> 25:55.400]  give him an address or anything like that? No I did not. Okay so what was the
[25:55.400 --> 26:03.720]  end result of the stop? The end result of the stop was I called an arrest but
[26:03.720 --> 26:08.400]  what he said was I said well I need my key back I gotta go he said no he said
[26:08.400 --> 26:13.800]  you're not taking that vehicle on these public roads I said no wait a minute I
[26:13.800 --> 26:16.800]  said officer I already told you it's not a vehicle and the public has a right to
[26:16.800 --> 26:21.120]  travel I said I have a right to be out on the roads if I'm not I'm not in
[26:21.120 --> 26:25.120]  transportation he goes he goes I'm telling you again he goes you are not
[26:25.120 --> 26:30.200]  taking that automobile vehicle whatever you want to call it out on my roads and
[26:30.200 --> 26:36.360]  it's just how he worded it so I'm like well I said then this is an arrest in I
[26:36.360 --> 26:41.240]  said you realize that he goes no it isn't he said you're free to go you can
[26:41.240 --> 26:47.920]  walk you could do whatever it's an illegal seizure right he cannot articulate
[26:47.920 --> 26:55.200]  a crime but he sees property anyway that's what I called it that's what I
[26:55.200 --> 27:03.560]  was going to put in my complaint to the illegal seizure of property well don't
[27:03.560 --> 27:10.240]  forget to say that the initial stop itself was illegal he had no he had no
[27:10.240 --> 27:14.000]  observable basis to make a determination that you were engaging in any sort of
[27:14.000 --> 27:19.680]  transportation related activity and he stopped you anyway he had no probable
[27:19.680 --> 27:24.280]  cause to make that stop his misunderstanding of the law does not
[27:24.280 --> 27:29.200]  establish probable cause no matter how much the Supreme Court wants to say
[27:29.200 --> 27:35.400]  ignorance of the law is an excuse when you're a cop it just ain't right and it
[27:35.400 --> 27:41.480]  needs to be argued as such agreed now I asked him that I told us you didn't have
[27:41.480 --> 27:44.840]  no problem cost to stop me he said yes I did your sticker was green because they're
[27:44.840 --> 27:51.680]  now orange so it was by the expired by how many time a sticker being registration
[27:51.680 --> 27:57.080]  or inspection a registration yeah how many times have I said what Texas law
[27:57.080 --> 28:01.520]  says about that it's not illegal to not have a registration sticker it's
[28:01.520 --> 28:05.320]  illegal to have one that's expired
[28:09.320 --> 28:15.560]  well this one would have probably been expired but see I just bought the the
[28:15.560 --> 28:19.960]  audible bill and I don't know should I just take the why didn't your bill of
[28:19.960 --> 28:22.880]  sale have a date on it
[28:22.880 --> 28:27.800]  well when they gave it to me it didn't have a date what do you mean when they
[28:27.800 --> 28:33.720]  gave it to you the the couple I bought it from why didn't you have your own bill
[28:33.720 --> 28:39.560]  of sale prepared to have them sign off on when you bought it that was a question
[28:39.560 --> 28:43.640]  I had for you because on everybody's bill of sale and on the title and even on
[28:43.640 --> 28:48.360]  your insurance card and this is a problem for me and always mentions the
[28:48.360 --> 28:53.840]  vehicle and it even has a VIN number now we know it's not a vehicle by motor
[28:53.840 --> 28:59.160]  vehicle code definition no it is it's just not a vehicle according to statute
[28:59.160 --> 29:07.720]  correct okay so this again goes to the legal semantics a common name of vehicle
[29:07.720 --> 29:13.560]  is not the same as a statutory name of vehicle or reference I should say a
[29:13.560 --> 29:18.360]  common language reference to vehicle is not a statutory reference to vehicle
[29:18.360 --> 29:23.040]  though they will make every effort to make it appear as if they are that's the
[29:23.040 --> 29:27.080]  fraud that's what I'm afraid they're going to do with stuff that's written on
[29:27.080 --> 29:32.920]  like say your insurance card where it has a VIN number so how do you counter that
[29:32.920 --> 29:41.160]  it doesn't matter just just put numbers that a VIN okay on your bill of sale
[29:41.160 --> 29:47.080]  how hard is that okay you can write the bill of sale up dang near any way you
[29:47.080 --> 29:55.520]  want mm-hmm in fact I'm pretty sure that the seminar material has an example
[29:55.520 --> 30:00.440]  bill of sale in it okay
[30:01.960 --> 30:06.560]  thousands of Florida motorists convicted of DUI may very well have been driving
[30:06.560 --> 30:10.960]  under the blood alcohol limit I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with
[30:10.960 --> 30:16.160]  a tale of bad breathalysers and a government cover-up in a moment privacy
[30:16.160 --> 30:20.480]  is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back
[30:20.480 --> 30:24.920]  again and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to
[30:24.920 --> 30:29.440]  vanish too so protect your rights say no to surveillance and keep your
[30:29.440 --> 30:34.600]  information to yourself privacy it's worth hanging on to this public service
[30:34.600 --> 30:38.520]  announcement is brought to you by start page dot com the private search engine
[30:38.520 --> 30:45.600]  alternative to Google Yahoo and Bing start over with start page ever hear the
[30:45.600 --> 30:50.280]  term fine farming it's when cops find innocent people to bring in revenue and
[30:50.280 --> 30:54.360]  it's apparently big business in the Sunshine State of Florida this case
[30:54.360 --> 30:58.720]  involves breathalysers used to convict thousands of Florida motorists for DUI
[30:58.720 --> 31:03.320]  violations recently reporters discovered that the devices were improperly
[31:03.320 --> 31:07.880]  calibrated state officials knew about it for two and a half years but did nothing
[31:07.880 --> 31:12.480]  in fact the head of Florida's breath testing program ordered inspectors not
[31:12.480 --> 31:17.480]  to document the problem a DUI conviction can ruin somebody's life but now that
[31:17.480 --> 31:21.800]  the cover-up has been exposed perhaps Florida drivers can breathe a bit easier
[31:21.800 --> 31:28.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht more news and information at Catherine Albrecht.com
[31:30.040 --> 31:35.480]  this is building 7 a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of
[31:35.480 --> 31:39.760]  September 11 the government says the fire brought it down however 1500
[31:39.760 --> 31:44.280]  architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition over 6,000 my
[31:44.280 --> 31:47.720]  fellow service members have given their lives thousands of my fellow force
[31:47.720 --> 31:50.920]  responders at the height I'm not a conspiracy theorist structural
[31:50.920 --> 31:54.560]  engineers in New York City correctional I'm an Air Force pilot I'm a father who
[31:54.560 --> 31:58.960]  lost his son we're Americans and we deserve the truth go to remember
[31:58.960 --> 32:05.000]  building 7.org today rule law radio is proud to offer the rule law traffic
[32:05.000 --> 32:08.680]  seminar in today's America we live in an us against them society if we the people
[32:08.680 --> 32:11.600]  are never going to have a free society then we're going to have to stand and
[32:11.600 --> 32:15.080]  defend our own rights among those rights are the right to travel freely from
[32:15.080 --> 32:18.320]  place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly
[32:18.320 --> 32:22.040]  the right to due process of law traffic courts afford us the least expensive
[32:22.040 --> 32:25.560]  opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process
[32:25.560 --> 32:29.080]  former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with rule of law radio has
[32:29.080 --> 32:31.880]  put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help
[32:31.880 --> 32:35.800]  you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule law you
[32:35.800 --> 32:39.040]  can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rule law radio
[32:39.040 --> 32:42.600]  comm and ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll receive a copy of
[32:42.600 --> 32:46.040]  Eddie's book the Texas Transportation Code the law versus the lie video and
[32:46.040 --> 32:49.480]  audio of your original 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents and
[32:49.480 --> 32:52.640]  other useful resource material learn how to fight for your rights with the help
[32:52.640 --> 32:56.320]  of this material from rule law radio comm order your copy today and together
[32:56.320 --> 33:05.160]  we can have free society we all want and deserve live free speech radio logos
[33:05.160 --> 33:32.160]  radio network.com
[33:35.160 --> 33:58.000]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio the calling number five one
[33:58.000 --> 34:05.200]  two six four six nineteen eighty four okay let's get back on here with Tyler and
[34:05.200 --> 34:10.440]  Wyoming all right Tyler go ahead okay one of my main questions Eddie because
[34:10.440 --> 34:13.760]  I got a case going with the city now it'll be with the county with the
[34:13.760 --> 34:20.800]  sheriff's department how do I stop basically the double triple quadruple
[34:20.800 --> 34:25.120]  jeopardy what do you want to call it because every time they stop you they
[34:25.120 --> 34:30.280]  want to write you at the same time until you make a case and sue them and can
[34:30.280 --> 34:35.320]  prove everything like I've discussed it on this show about the laws in your
[34:35.320 --> 34:42.440]  state you're not okay you're asking for a genie in a bottle which and you're not
[34:42.440 --> 34:48.360]  going to get it the only way to do it is to get all the research done like I've
[34:48.360 --> 34:53.200]  done here and put it together first in a remonstrous of the legislature and then
[34:53.200 --> 34:59.360]  a lawsuit to the state that's the only way you're going to get rid of this and
[34:59.360 --> 35:06.000]  what they do it's the only way what law what lawsuit would it be
[35:06.760 --> 35:13.960]  violation of rights so that would be a title 42 no you're not suing them at the
[35:13.960 --> 35:18.680]  federal level for violating federal law you're suing them at the state level for
[35:18.680 --> 35:30.680]  misapplying a state law under the state constitution okay so that would be in a
[35:30.680 --> 35:40.320]  district court to start yeah now I need to research that more what would the name
[35:40.320 --> 35:51.000]  of the lawsuit be or what you can name it anything you want okay do you sue the
[35:51.000 --> 35:55.760]  individual actors for example the officers you sue the individual agencies
[35:55.760 --> 36:04.920]  and their directors all right because they had a duty to properly train their
[36:04.920 --> 36:09.000]  people and their people had a duty to properly enforce the law they were
[36:09.000 --> 36:15.560]  required to know that law they didn't thus they committed fraud repeatedly
[36:15.560 --> 36:21.560]  against millions and millions of people literally over howling how long of a
[36:21.560 --> 36:37.760]  period of time mm-hmm okay so it'd be against the individual officers no it's
[36:37.760 --> 36:44.040]  not against the individual officers and it's not for money okay the only way
[36:44.040 --> 36:49.040]  you're going to get this is to force them to stop enforcing the law and
[36:49.040 --> 36:54.440]  correctly correct okay but you're not going to get any money out of it you
[36:54.440 --> 36:59.920]  bet on it you're talking about suing the departments like the sheriff's
[36:59.920 --> 37:08.480]  department or the city PD here in Texas the first agency you would sue will be
[37:08.480 --> 37:19.160]  the Texas Department of Public Safety and its director McCraw okay okay because
[37:19.160 --> 37:24.880]  they are the agency that code itself says is responsible for every chapter in
[37:24.880 --> 37:29.960]  it on enforcement oh I see you saying okay in this case in Wyoming that would
[37:29.960 --> 37:36.880]  be the DOT well no look the transportation code in Texas has three
[37:36.880 --> 37:43.480]  or it where it matters it has two distinct agencies the Department of
[37:43.480 --> 37:47.440]  Motor Vehicles the department which is the Department of Transportation and it
[37:47.440 --> 37:52.720]  has a Department of Public Safety the Department of Public Safety deals with
[37:52.720 --> 37:58.480]  enforcement of certain public safety provisions of the code and the programs
[37:58.480 --> 38:06.040]  associated with public safety okay mm-hmm the DOT does everything else
[38:06.040 --> 38:12.440]  including okay the part the DMV part of it which does vehicle registration i.e.
[38:12.440 --> 38:16.600]  the licensing of the cars versus the licensing of the people which is under
[38:16.600 --> 38:28.640]  DPS okay okay now you would have to sue both of those and before that it was in
[38:28.640 --> 38:33.600]  the county level but either way you would have to sue both of those agencies
[38:33.600 --> 38:38.600]  jointly for fraud and the fraud is that they are misrepresenting to the public
[38:38.600 --> 38:43.680]  the subject matter of the code they're collecting fees and charging fines
[38:43.680 --> 38:51.000]  illegally against people who do not owe them thus they are committing fraud okay
[38:51.000 --> 38:56.440]  so you're going to have to sue for injunctive relief then you can sue
[38:56.440 --> 39:01.840]  separately in the case of fraud if you can prove money damages through the
[39:01.840 --> 39:15.280]  fraud yeah but basically you would have to figure out a way to retroactively
[39:15.280 --> 39:18.840]  claim that they were committing fraud against you the whole time and that you
[39:18.840 --> 39:22.520]  were never in a motor vehicle because you went through all it's just like the
[39:22.520 --> 39:29.080]  income tax stuff you file the W4 and the W9 and the W2 you're in the income tax
[39:29.080 --> 39:37.360]  whether you wanted to be or not end of story right right well here in Wyoming
[39:37.360 --> 39:41.400]  see the way that code is written it's not as clear as Texas and they ought to
[39:41.400 --> 39:49.840]  be sued for avoid for fake well and but go ahead you say that until you figure
[39:49.840 --> 39:54.440]  out that you're not looking in all the right places because I did exactly the
[39:54.440 --> 39:59.320]  same thing when I first started in this I concentrated on one code because I
[39:59.320 --> 40:05.200]  thought everything should be in that one code it isn't not by a long shot is it
[40:05.200 --> 40:14.120]  all in one code okay for every agency that's in a code there is more than
[40:14.120 --> 40:20.080]  likely a section in the occupations code a section in the administrative code a
[40:20.080 --> 40:25.600]  section in the government code or the local government code and possibly a
[40:25.600 --> 40:36.920]  couple of others such as let's see our water code okay there's actually an
[40:36.920 --> 40:43.720]  entity that's in all of those places now go through that again it's occupations
[40:43.720 --> 40:47.320]  code government code what were you other two local government code
[40:47.320 --> 40:56.480]  administrative code as well as the specific code okay for instance DPS is
[40:56.480 --> 40:59.880]  in all of the enforcement chapters of the transportation code it is also
[40:59.880 --> 41:06.600]  entitled 37 of the administrative code it is also relative to occupations for
[41:06.600 --> 41:12.480]  law enforcement under the occupations code it is also relevant to the meaning
[41:12.480 --> 41:20.080]  and interpretation of law under chapter 311 and 312 of the government code okay
[41:20.080 --> 41:25.080]  and then when it comes to local cops there's this chapter or the local
[41:25.080 --> 41:31.160]  government code in addition to the government code okay I think in Wyoming
[41:31.160 --> 41:34.640]  here and I got a research just a little more I think the division that handles
[41:34.640 --> 41:40.400]  the DOT administers and their forces all code but it's certain divisions in the
[41:40.400 --> 41:44.520]  chapters I think it is the department I'm willing to bet you find out that the
[41:44.520 --> 41:49.680]  deep the Department of Public Safety your state police agency does not answer to
[41:49.680 --> 41:59.560]  the Department of Transportation okay so they will be completely separate and
[41:59.560 --> 42:04.520]  independent therefore the code if it gives them authority would have to give
[42:04.520 --> 42:08.160]  it to them directly it wouldn't put them under the Department of Transportation
[42:08.160 --> 42:13.760]  as being answerable to them for that section of that code I've bet money on
[42:13.760 --> 42:21.600]  it okay so you're saying there there's got to be a Department of Public Safety
[42:21.600 --> 42:25.960]  or something else look at the definitions in each chapter for instance go to the
[42:25.960 --> 42:33.440]  chapter on insurance motor vehicle insurance okay find who is defined as
[42:33.440 --> 42:42.040]  department what agency of the state is defined as department same thing with
[42:42.040 --> 42:51.680]  licensing same thing with registration same thing with any chapter
[42:51.680 --> 43:02.320]  mm-hmm okay and all you're looking for is department means or department includes
[43:02.320 --> 43:07.760]  and then in the statute you'll see the department shall the department shall an
[43:07.760 --> 43:12.760]  officer of the department shall blah blah blah a person associated with the
[43:12.760 --> 43:19.320]  department shall it always goes back to the department and it never mentions the
[43:19.320 --> 43:26.280]  specific department Matt it does in the definition that's why you need to know
[43:26.280 --> 43:32.040]  what it is so you know who it's talking about what it says department right
[43:32.040 --> 43:39.880]  okay now I'm still waiting to hear response from the city I haven't they
[43:39.880 --> 43:45.080]  haven't I filed four or five documents in there and they haven't got back I just
[43:45.080 --> 43:49.720]  filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the
[43:49.720 --> 43:54.680]  others were a motion to challenge the jurisdiction with an affidavit of not
[43:54.680 --> 44:02.160]  being okay hang on Tyler let me let me get this break are you the plaintiff or
[44:02.160 --> 44:06.920]  defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney with jurisdiction
[44:06.920 --> 44:12.920]  the affordable easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24
[44:12.920 --> 44:18.720]  hours step-by-step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyers should be doing
[44:18.720 --> 44:23.680]  if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have
[44:23.680 --> 44:29.440]  won with our step-by-step course and now you can to jurisdiction area was created
[44:29.440 --> 44:34.960]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience even if you're
[44:34.960 --> 44:39.240]  not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[44:39.240 --> 44:44.000]  principles and practices that control our American courts you'll receive our
[44:44.000 --> 44:50.920]  audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases pro se tactics and
[44:50.920 --> 44:56.760]  much more please visit rule of law radio calm and click on the banner or call
[44:56.760 --> 45:04.120]  toll-free 866 law easy I love logos without the shows on this network I'd
[45:04.120 --> 45:07.960]  be almost as ignorant as my friends I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's
[45:07.960 --> 45:12.840]  no going back I need my troops fit I'd be lost without logos and I really want
[45:12.840 --> 45:15.800]  to help keep this network on the air and I'd love to volunteer as a show
[45:15.800 --> 45:19.360]  producer but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money to give
[45:19.360 --> 45:24.840]  because I spent it all on supplement how can I help logo well I'm glad you ask
[45:24.840 --> 45:29.040]  whenever you order anything from Amazon you can help logos with ordering your
[45:29.040 --> 45:33.560]  supplies or holiday gifts first thing you do is clear your cookies now go to
[45:33.560 --> 45:39.560]  logos radio network calm tick on the Amazon logo and book market now when
[45:39.560 --> 45:44.840]  you order anything from Amazon you use that link and logos gets a few pesos do
[45:44.840 --> 45:49.560]  I pay extra no do I have to do anything different when I order no can I use my
[45:49.560 --> 45:55.120]  Amazon Prime no I mean yes wow giving without doing anything or spending any
[45:55.120 --> 46:14.600]  money this is perfect thank you so much we are well go happy holidays logos
[46:25.120 --> 46:36.280]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio call in number five one two
[46:36.280 --> 46:40.480]  six four six nineteen eighty four if you want to call and discuss something with
[46:40.480 --> 46:47.640]  us all right back to Tyler all right Tyler anyway it had called about four
[46:47.640 --> 46:54.280]  or five documents in the city court so far municipal no response yet my last
[46:54.280 --> 47:00.720]  one was a motion to dismiss in in that motion I'd proven where the agencies
[47:00.720 --> 47:08.840]  that govern for example the whole title 31 of the motor vehicle code can only
[47:08.840 --> 47:14.560]  regulate the only have the constitutional authority regulate carriers for
[47:14.560 --> 47:19.320]  example the the department that created the division of motor vehicles was put
[47:19.320 --> 47:24.480]  under the jurisdiction of the board of equalization and the board of
[47:24.480 --> 47:30.040]  equalization constitutionally can only regulate any kind of common carrier
[47:30.040 --> 47:38.240]  including rail and air so with that being said that proves the subject matter
[47:38.240 --> 47:43.360]  jurisdiction basically of the Department of Motor Vehicles but I haven't got a
[47:43.360 --> 47:48.560]  response back from any of those documents or anything that I filed and I
[47:48.560 --> 47:53.400]  think they're just kind of sitting on them and under protest they still wanted
[47:53.400 --> 47:56.920]  me to come into a hearing and I said well I don't want them I'm not going to
[47:56.920 --> 48:01.520]  make a plea I filed a motion of special appearance and non plea of course
[48:01.520 --> 48:05.360]  challenging the jurisdiction they got all that and the judge was respectfully
[48:05.360 --> 48:10.320]  interested in what he said was we either have jurisdiction we don't and of
[48:10.320 --> 48:14.720]  course he doesn't but then I thought he was going to set things for motion
[48:14.720 --> 48:19.400]  hearings and I got out of the courtroom and when I got to the window that the
[48:19.400 --> 48:25.160]  clerk handed me a notice and order of trial setting so I filed another
[48:25.160 --> 48:29.560]  document to vacate that trial because I said number one I didn't have counsel
[48:29.560 --> 48:33.320]  present and I put them on notice I didn't want any procedural things done or
[48:33.320 --> 48:37.920]  especially trials that without counsel present they still did then I listed in
[48:37.920 --> 48:41.800]  the Supreme Court case where they prejudiced my rights so I think he'll
[48:41.800 --> 48:46.040]  probably answer that and he'll vacate it but the point is we can't get into
[48:46.040 --> 48:49.720]  trials on these things because that'll just discuss merits and they'll rubber
[48:49.720 --> 48:54.640]  stamp it so I want to try to win this out of court since I'm already in it I
[48:54.640 --> 49:00.520]  understand I have to go to further courts to get relieved but how do I stay out of
[49:00.520 --> 49:05.000]  court and get this thing dismissed again you're not going to stop them from
[49:05.000 --> 49:08.600]  going ahead and doing what they're going to do when they won't follow their own
[49:08.600 --> 49:14.920]  rules well all you need to make sure you do is object to any attempt to couch
[49:14.920 --> 49:20.760]  what you were doing as relative to that code by objecting to it make sure you
[49:20.760 --> 49:25.120]  file the be prepared for those objections to know that in advance that
[49:25.120 --> 49:30.560]  they're going to do it prepare a written objection for every single term or phrase
[49:30.560 --> 49:36.280]  in that code they can throw at you operated a motor vehicle objection I
[49:36.280 --> 49:41.960]  was neither an operator nor more nor operating a motor vehicle under the
[49:41.960 --> 49:49.240]  statutes according to the requirements blah blah blah okay right and so you
[49:49.240 --> 49:53.160]  write a written objection the state has introduced no evidence of applicability
[49:53.160 --> 49:57.400]  of this code or this statute by proving I was operating a motor vehicle they
[49:57.400 --> 50:02.920]  simply presume it and they cannot do that in a criminal case they cannot
[50:02.920 --> 50:10.080]  presume any element of the offense to be true it violates your right to be
[50:10.080 --> 50:16.200]  considered innocent correct and that's what such an insult common sense because
[50:16.200 --> 50:21.280]  when you get in these courts they they defame you so much because all they do
[50:21.280 --> 50:25.440]  I even went into the definition of vehicle and I explained how the term
[50:25.440 --> 50:31.240]  transport only applies to a carrier nowhere and no no legal document or
[50:31.240 --> 50:35.440]  case anywhere then you find that definition just talking about somebody
[50:35.440 --> 50:39.800]  traveling to the store it doesn't apply and a research that well and they just
[50:39.800 --> 50:43.760]  ignored it they totally ignored my argument and then they went back and
[50:43.760 --> 50:48.240]  said well yeah he but he has a motor vehicle but they didn't prove it again
[50:48.240 --> 50:54.080]  no evidence that's exactly why you have to expect that stuff and file written
[50:54.080 --> 50:58.400]  objections filed judicial conduct complaints against the judge then you
[50:58.400 --> 51:03.880]  have to appeal on judicial error the judge's conclusion is not based upon
[51:03.880 --> 51:09.520]  law it's based upon a prejudicial personal opinion to maintain the status
[51:09.520 --> 51:15.080]  quo in his faith check yeah yeah
[51:15.960 --> 51:21.400]  prejudicial personal opinion yeah that's a good way to put it yeah I need to do
[51:21.400 --> 51:28.280]  more of that I'm gonna start doing more of the judicial conduct complaints and
[51:28.280 --> 51:32.440]  appeal Blair the last case that we talked about let you go get it you know
[51:32.440 --> 51:37.000]  you have other cars but my dad had a good case I helped him with it same kind
[51:37.000 --> 51:41.840]  of thing the appellate court a rubber stamped it took him eight months to
[51:41.840 --> 51:46.840]  respond yeah I think he's trying to figure out how to respond you know without
[51:46.840 --> 51:51.200]  being sued I think he's doing but anyway took eight months then he finally came
[51:51.200 --> 51:56.280]  back and said this was his reasoning no he said the defendant must have had a
[51:56.280 --> 52:00.600]  vehicle because he admitted to not having a license but he said he had a
[52:00.600 --> 52:05.880]  license to travel under the Constitution but he didn't even cite in the record
[52:05.880 --> 52:10.360]  where he said that because he didn't say it like that what he said was he didn't
[52:10.360 --> 52:15.640]  need a license because he had a constitutional license to travel and
[52:15.640 --> 52:19.280]  that's what he was referring to but just by that statement and he couldn't even
[52:19.280 --> 52:24.360]  say in the record where he said it he rubber stamped the case even though we
[52:24.360 --> 52:28.480]  did jet objected several times to not having a motor vehicle driving
[52:28.480 --> 52:34.120]  operating transporting persons and property not using our our private
[52:34.120 --> 52:39.600]  auto as a carrier etc which is what the whole code implies and they just went
[52:39.600 --> 52:42.720]  back to oh no you had a motor vehicle so they didn't argue with us that we had
[52:42.720 --> 52:46.480]  right to travel you're right about that but they just throw you back in the
[52:46.480 --> 52:49.480]  motor vehicle category which automatically puts you which is the
[52:49.480 --> 52:54.080]  fraud and that's why you have to appeal it that's why you have to say the right
[52:54.080 --> 52:58.720]  thing to make the record so that the appeals court can't rubber stamp it by
[52:58.720 --> 53:05.200]  doing the same thing that's how they've maintained this for so long yeah and I
[53:05.200 --> 53:10.640]  wanted to say I appreciate what you do I've learned a lot from you and I I've
[53:10.640 --> 53:15.640]  spent a hundred hundreds of hours probably in the library and in different
[53:15.640 --> 53:18.880]  places trying to study these things and I've come up with a pretty good case
[53:18.880 --> 53:23.840]  they usually don't respond to my motions to dismiss anymore and I don't know if
[53:23.840 --> 53:26.400]  that's because they know I'm right and they're afraid to get sued they just
[53:26.400 --> 53:31.040]  ignore it but what they tend to do is just ignore it and go on and then I'm
[53:31.040 --> 53:35.400]  just supposed to forget about it or whatever and but but they don't dismiss
[53:35.400 --> 53:41.480]  the action they just still go ahead and that to me is an example of tyranny
[53:41.480 --> 53:46.960]  where they don't have to verify that's what a court of law supposed to be we
[53:46.960 --> 53:51.640]  put our documents in they put theirs in then we go to court and we hash it out
[53:51.640 --> 53:55.320]  we we and then there should be a finding effect and conclusions of law on the
[53:55.320 --> 54:03.200]  record none of that happens no that happens at all and I'm just trying to
[54:03.200 --> 54:06.560]  I want to hold them accountable though because I'm getting tired of the
[54:06.560 --> 54:11.400]  harassment you know and I'm trying to figure out how to do that it's a work
[54:11.400 --> 54:14.600]  in progress but anyway I know you got to the callers but I wanted to say thank
[54:14.600 --> 54:18.920]  you for for the knowledge you've given us and the work that you're doing out
[54:18.920 --> 54:26.800]  there in Texas well I had to help or I can get I could I email you my number
[54:26.800 --> 54:31.800]  Eddie I lost yours because I could set my phone was stolen yeah you can email it
[54:31.800 --> 54:37.280]  to me could could you call me so I could have yours again or I know you probably
[54:37.280 --> 54:42.600]  don't give that on the air but no I'm definitely not giving it out on here it
[54:42.600 --> 54:48.240]  rings enough as it is no I appreciate that I used to have it but I like said
[54:48.240 --> 54:52.720]  my phone was stolen and my automobile is actually stolen which they recovered
[54:52.720 --> 54:58.840]  they broke my phone so that's how that came about but I will send you an
[54:58.840 --> 55:02.680]  email with my number and hopefully you can send me an email with your phone
[55:02.680 --> 55:10.280]  number back if you can okay all right thank you yes sir bye bye bye bye all
[55:10.280 --> 55:18.040]  right now we have three minutes and we have Chris in California Chris what can
[55:18.040 --> 55:25.520]  we do for you hello lady no you had a nice week nice and relaxing and low
[55:25.520 --> 55:34.360]  stress and everything nope well welcome to the club following up real quick
[55:34.360 --> 55:41.360]  here on the last caller with with all the traffic stuff is that discussion you
[55:41.360 --> 55:45.080]  had with him how much of that is in your traffic seminar is that something
[55:45.080 --> 55:49.080]  that's because the only thing it kept resounding my brain listening to that is
[55:49.080 --> 55:54.960]  its preparation which you touched on would that have helped him or is that
[55:54.960 --> 55:59.840]  something you think he already well the seminar is based upon Texas law if you
[55:59.840 --> 56:05.000]  are living a different state than how the seminar helps you is it teaches you
[56:05.000 --> 56:09.080]  how to read a statute it teaches you how to do legal research to find the
[56:09.080 --> 56:15.320]  statutes you need it gives you an idea of where to look and what to look for
[56:15.320 --> 56:21.680]  something a lot of people have no clue about it seems yeah so it's also got
[56:21.680 --> 56:26.480]  tons and tons of sample templates on how to write legal pleadings and they're
[56:26.480 --> 56:30.240]  adaptable to any state as long as you know the law to put in the correct place
[56:30.240 --> 56:37.400]  in the motions okay so yeah that's you know if you're gonna be challenging
[56:37.400 --> 56:44.120]  especially low IQ people that are carrying a gun and having to force the
[56:44.120 --> 56:48.200]  law well you don't challenge the low IQ idiots with the gun on the side of the
[56:48.200 --> 56:52.920]  road that's something that Tyler and I discussed it when you a minute ago there's
[56:52.920 --> 56:57.880]  a difference between a cop saying please explain this to me and another one's
[56:57.880 --> 57:04.200]  screaming in your face and you're trying to explain it to him anyway okay yeah
[57:04.200 --> 57:08.440]  so we don't do that unless they specifically ask we are not there to
[57:08.440 --> 57:12.000]  educate them on the side of the road all that's going to get you is injured
[57:12.000 --> 57:17.280]  yeah not because eventually you're going to come to realize you're trying to
[57:17.280 --> 57:25.040]  explain physics to a teapot and it isn't sinking in exactly and then when you
[57:25.040 --> 57:29.280]  roll your eyes and go how did you get this job that's when they tell you and
[57:29.280 --> 57:34.880]  drag you out of the car hopefully still listen into the show that's the kind of
[57:34.880 --> 57:39.240]  thing that yeah it's just one of things that how did you get this job with an
[57:39.240 --> 57:45.360]  IQ that small mm-hmm well that's probably why they found them I mean that is but
[57:45.360 --> 57:51.160]  even then you'd think they'd have to be able to write to do it well imagine they
[57:51.160 --> 57:58.040]  can write but whether they get to that stage of the interaction who knows okay
[57:58.040 --> 58:01.280]  well I got a break Chris so hang on just a minute and I'll pick you up on the
[58:01.280 --> 58:06.440]  other side of the break okay yeah we're good all right folks this is rule of law
[58:06.440 --> 58:13.480]  radio the call in number 512 646 1984 please give us a call get in line and
[58:13.480 --> 58:29.520]  let's have a discussion y'all hang on and we will be right back
[58:43.480 --> 58:55.320]  the Bible remains the most popular book in the world yet countless readers are
[58:55.320 --> 58:59.880]  frustrated because they struggle to understand it some new translations try
[58:59.880 --> 59:04.880]  to help by simplifying the text but in the process can compromise the profound
[59:04.880 --> 59:10.160]  meaning of the scripture enter the recovery version first this new
[59:10.160 --> 59:15.080]  translation is extremely faithful and accurate but the real story is the more
[59:15.080 --> 59:20.360]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes difficult and profound passages are
[59:20.360 --> 59:25.040]  opened up in a marvelous way providing an entrance into the riches of the word
[59:25.040 --> 59:29.920]  beyond which you've ever experienced before Bibles for America would like to
[59:29.920 --> 59:34.680]  give you a free recovery version simply for the asking this comprehensive yet
[59:34.680 --> 59:43.360]  compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.360 --> 59:49.400]  or by ordering online at free study Bible dot com that's free study Bible
[59:49.400 --> 59:56.040]  dot com you are listening to the logos radio network logos radio network dot
[59:56.040 --> 01:00:07.600]  com the following is brought to you by the low star lowdown markets for Monday
[01:00:07.600 --> 01:00:12.120]  the 22nd of July 2019 open with precious metals gold one thousand four hundred
[01:00:12.120 --> 01:00:15.400]  twenty nine dollars an ounce silver sixteen dollars forty five cents an ounce
[01:00:15.400 --> 01:00:19.720]  copper two dollars seventy five cents an ounce oil Texas crew fifty five dollars
[01:00:19.720 --> 01:00:23.200]  sixty three cents a barrel Brent crude sixty two dollars forty seven cents a
[01:00:23.200 --> 01:00:27.520]  barrel and cryptos in order of market cap Bitcoin core ten thousand five hundred
[01:00:27.520 --> 01:00:31.120]  sixty six dollars fifty two cents Ethereum two hundred twenty seven dollars
[01:00:31.120 --> 01:00:36.120]  and twenty six cents XRP ripple thirty three cents like coin hundred dollars and
[01:00:36.120 --> 01:00:40.240]  thirty one cents and Bitcoin cash is at three hundred twenty four dollars and ten
[01:00:40.240 --> 01:00:50.080]  cents a crypto coin in history the year nineteen sixteen the preparedness day
[01:00:50.080 --> 01:00:54.960]  bombing a time suitcase bomb was detonated on market street in San Francisco
[01:00:54.960 --> 01:00:59.360]  during the World War one preparedness day parade killing 10 and entering 40
[01:00:59.360 --> 01:01:07.720]  today in history and recent news since governor Greg Abbott signed House bill
[01:01:07.720 --> 01:01:12.680]  1325 legalizing happen to Texas law back in June county prosecutors around the
[01:01:12.680 --> 01:01:16.360]  state including Houston Austin San Antonio have been dropping marijuana
[01:01:16.360 --> 01:01:19.920]  possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they are stimulating
[01:01:19.920 --> 01:01:23.760]  that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the earth
[01:01:23.760 --> 01:01:28.160]  for THC Margaret Moore the Travis County District Attorney announced earlier
[01:01:28.160 --> 01:01:31.600]  this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of
[01:01:31.600 --> 01:01:36.200]  marijuana cases because of the law Mr. Abbott and other state officials including
[01:01:36.200 --> 01:01:39.320]  the Attorney General stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys
[01:01:39.320 --> 01:01:43.480]  back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that
[01:01:43.480 --> 01:01:48.600]  these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works as
[01:01:48.600 --> 01:01:53.800]  well as other cities to like the District Attorney in El Paso Kyma Esparza
[01:01:53.800 --> 01:01:58.200]  a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law quote will not have
[01:01:58.200 --> 01:02:02.840]  an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso however the
[01:02:02.840 --> 01:02:06.440]  issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball an assistant public
[01:02:06.440 --> 01:02:10.600]  defender in Harris County who stated that quote the law is constantly changing
[01:02:10.600 --> 01:02:14.440]  on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup it's important that
[01:02:14.440 --> 01:02:23.000]  if someone is charged with something the test matches with their charged with a
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:27.080]  paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket
[01:02:27.080 --> 01:02:31.680]  shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico the specimen being only
[01:02:31.680 --> 01:02:36.320]  the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found
[01:02:36.320 --> 01:02:40.640]  way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean according to the university paper
[01:02:40.640 --> 01:02:46.120]  the shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near its front fins for the
[01:02:46.120 --> 01:03:13.680]  purposes hypothesized to learn pray maybe drawn into the globe
[01:03:13.680 --> 01:03:20.680]  made of them homemade wine and the country boy can't survive
[01:03:20.680 --> 01:03:26.680]  can't survive
[01:03:26.680 --> 01:03:30.680]  because you can't starve about and you can't make a run
[01:03:30.680 --> 01:03:53.600]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio calling number five one
[01:03:53.600 --> 01:03:57.560]  two six four six nineteen eighty four if you want to give us a call and talk
[01:03:57.560 --> 01:04:01.760]  about whatever you got on your mind all right back to chris in California all
[01:04:01.760 --> 01:04:07.400]  right chris go ahead yeah okay so the traffic seminar and then being prepared
[01:04:07.400 --> 01:04:14.160]  for the the guys with the guns on their side I guess a video camera probably
[01:04:14.160 --> 01:04:21.760]  wouldn't hurt several wouldn't hurt yeah I think just for myself getting a
[01:04:21.760 --> 01:04:25.880]  situation like that I'd want to you know like you guys are always preaching have
[01:04:25.880 --> 01:04:31.760]  all my ducks in a row and cameras and whatever else I might need always a
[01:04:31.760 --> 01:04:39.440]  good idea it's it's time to become a boy scout be prepared which is gonna leave
[01:04:39.440 --> 01:04:44.160]  me into my next topic but I want to finish up with a question because you and
[01:04:44.160 --> 01:04:48.880]  I guess Randy go back and forth sometimes about whether to what is it
[01:04:48.880 --> 01:04:55.920]  applied for with transportation one of the transportation departments to to
[01:04:55.920 --> 01:05:02.320]  declare non-commercial you know status or something like that I don't recall
[01:05:02.320 --> 01:05:09.880]  the specifics that's Randy applying to the federal DOT for a registration
[01:05:09.880 --> 01:05:15.760]  number with them that says he does not use his vehicle for transportation does
[01:05:15.760 --> 01:05:21.000]  that come with documents or different plates or anything or no it comes with
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:27.280]  a DOT number which by definition makes it transportation which which means
[01:05:27.280 --> 01:05:35.840]  there's nothing on your vehicle to alert anybody of that status they know
[01:05:35.840 --> 01:05:43.040]  there's it's a DOT number it says DOT number okay but the thing about it is
[01:05:43.040 --> 01:05:48.320]  my argument remains the same the fact that if you register with the DOT the
[01:05:48.320 --> 01:05:55.520]  Department of Transportation as a non-commercial vehicle okay the thing
[01:05:55.520 --> 01:06:00.800]  about it is people don't understand the terminology before they do these things
[01:06:00.800 --> 01:06:06.960]  a non-commercial vehicle does not mean the vehicle does not engage in commerce
[01:06:06.960 --> 01:06:13.080]  it means it does not fit within the specific weight category hazardous
[01:06:13.080 --> 01:06:18.120]  materials carrying category or passenger carrying category as a
[01:06:18.120 --> 01:06:24.800]  commercial motor vehicle does it's still commercial it's just not commercial by
[01:06:24.800 --> 01:06:29.680]  weight class which is how they differentiate the vehicles a motor
[01:06:29.680 --> 01:06:34.240]  vehicles anything that's not a commercial motor vehicle for the purpose of
[01:06:34.240 --> 01:06:41.000]  carrying capacity of passengers weight class of capacity or whether or not it
[01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:45.480]  bears a hazardous materials placard for instance a taxi cab is still a
[01:06:45.480 --> 01:06:50.560]  commercial vehicle even it's a commercial use vehicle even though it's not
[01:06:50.560 --> 01:06:56.680]  within the weight class of a commercial motor vehicle it's still a motor vehicle
[01:06:56.680 --> 01:07:03.840]  for commerce okay as is a shuttle bus when it takes less than 16 passengers
[01:07:03.840 --> 01:07:10.480]  including the driver as does anything else that falls under that weight class
[01:07:10.480 --> 01:07:16.440]  under that passenger capacity and does not bear a hazardous materials placard
[01:07:16.440 --> 01:07:22.800]  to transport hazardous materials but it still engages in transportation it's
[01:07:22.800 --> 01:07:29.400]  still a vehicle of commerce it's still a motor vehicle so by getting a non
[01:07:29.400 --> 01:07:35.320]  commercial number he didn't remove his truck from commercial status he just
[01:07:35.320 --> 01:07:39.800]  made sure it was limited to one oh brother
[01:07:39.800 --> 01:07:45.280]  technicality then yes a legal technicality but a very dangerous one to
[01:07:45.280 --> 01:07:51.720]  have on your side nonetheless that's interesting so yeah I see what you're
[01:07:51.720 --> 01:07:57.600]  saying so that's the bottom line on that is that it's not really gonna do anything
[01:07:57.600 --> 01:08:04.040]  for the officer if he even knows what it you know anything about that which I
[01:08:04.040 --> 01:08:07.200]  expect he must know something about it but it's still it's not going to prevent
[01:08:07.200 --> 01:08:13.480]  him from acting on you know a routine they're gonna do what they're going to
[01:08:13.480 --> 01:08:19.120]  do that's why you have to be prepared to do what you must do in order to fight
[01:08:19.120 --> 01:08:24.040]  back and that is know the law better than they do which isn't that difficult
[01:08:24.040 --> 01:08:28.240]  but you still have to know it well enough that you can outdo the prosecutors
[01:08:28.240 --> 01:08:36.200]  and outdo the judges not just the cops okay another kind of a I don't know if
[01:08:36.200 --> 01:08:42.480]  it's a stupid question probably z-plates you ever heard Anna Von Ritz Anna von
[01:08:42.480 --> 01:08:49.160]  fraud yeah I know who it is yeah so I'm doing my preparation here so that's
[01:08:49.160 --> 01:08:55.360]  what it is okay that made it pretty quick and simple everything that this she
[01:08:55.360 --> 01:09:01.200]  supposedly points puts out is nothing but patronut garbage that's all it is
[01:09:01.200 --> 01:09:07.040]  it has absolutely no basis in the actual written law it never has it is
[01:09:07.040 --> 01:09:13.240]  complete and utter BS no one I have given people opportunity after
[01:09:13.240 --> 01:09:18.720]  opportunity after opportunity to prove me wrong on that point and every single
[01:09:18.720 --> 01:09:24.040]  time they dump their so-called evidence in my email or in my lap to go look at
[01:09:24.040 --> 01:09:30.960]  it's the same crap over and over that has been disproven numerous times already
[01:09:30.960 --> 01:09:37.680]  it is a it is always based upon a complete misunderstanding based upon a
[01:09:37.680 --> 01:09:43.080]  misreading based upon a misconception based upon a misinterpretation and
[01:09:43.080 --> 01:09:49.320]  then based upon extrapolation upon extrapolation upon no existing facts
[01:09:49.320 --> 01:09:57.800]  that's how much of a quagmire spaghetti bowl of garbage it is that's kind of
[01:09:57.800 --> 01:10:05.240]  what I thought you're gonna say so well then you made a good guess yeah simple
[01:10:05.240 --> 01:10:09.240]  stuff I just wish my situation that I'm in now is that I mean traffic I died
[01:10:09.240 --> 01:10:14.680]  ahead your course you know long time ago if that's all I was trying to hear
[01:10:14.680 --> 01:10:18.960]  prepared for but I want to have my ducks in a row getting back to my well the
[01:10:18.960 --> 01:10:23.280]  thing of the beauty of the traffic seminar is it doesn't just teach you
[01:10:23.280 --> 01:10:29.120]  about one type of law it teaches you how to use every kind of law as far as
[01:10:29.120 --> 01:10:34.280]  legal research goes and knowing how to understand what someone's trying to
[01:10:34.280 --> 01:10:39.200]  charge you with or sue you for it teaches you how to learn that so you can
[01:10:39.200 --> 01:10:43.640]  fight back it's not limited just to traffic as far as the learning process
[01:10:43.640 --> 01:10:48.240]  goes but it is when it comes to the documents I prepared to fight back with
[01:10:48.240 --> 01:10:53.640]  I don't spend a lot of time you know doing all kinds of legal paperwork for
[01:10:53.640 --> 01:10:58.040]  all kinds of people in the seminar material I there's no way I could do
[01:10:58.040 --> 01:11:02.080]  that I could not write something that would cover every situation but in
[01:11:02.080 --> 01:11:06.920]  relation to transportation I can cover one that covers day near everything they
[01:11:06.920 --> 01:11:12.200]  do procedurally wrong and in violation of the actual law and how they've
[01:11:12.200 --> 01:11:17.640]  misinterpreted that stuff I can prepare for and write stuff for and I did more
[01:11:17.640 --> 01:11:22.480]  than 400 of them to be exact yeah and you're gonna be helping a hell of a lot
[01:11:22.480 --> 01:11:25.880]  of people because there's all the interactions and transportation related
[01:11:25.880 --> 01:11:31.680]  you know situations well it is usually the one place where the most people in
[01:11:31.680 --> 01:11:36.480]  counter law enforcement the most often if ever in their entire life is a traffic
[01:11:36.480 --> 01:11:43.640]  stop oh absolutely and then you got the graves materials too which I guess
[01:11:43.640 --> 01:11:49.040]  similarly go after well Dr. Graves material is all about civil lawsuits it
[01:11:49.040 --> 01:11:54.560]  does not cover the stuff like I deal with because here in Texas traffic offenses
[01:11:54.560 --> 01:12:00.560]  are criminal most of them are the only ones that weren't was red light camera
[01:12:00.560 --> 01:12:07.120]  citations and they had to sue you to recover that citation and they never
[01:12:07.120 --> 01:12:12.040]  did they just sent people bogus tickets to get their money when in fact they had
[01:12:12.040 --> 01:12:16.240]  no legitimate basis in law to ever send them a citation in the first place the
[01:12:16.240 --> 01:12:22.720]  law didn't let them do that but they did it and committed fraud so without
[01:12:22.720 --> 01:12:26.440]  knowing what I know about the transportation code and the statutes
[01:12:26.440 --> 01:12:31.360]  that govern that program I couldn't sit here and say that but I could and I said
[01:12:31.360 --> 01:12:36.680]  for years that the excess fees that the Department of Public Safety charge people
[01:12:36.680 --> 01:12:44.720]  on the driver responsibility program was absolutely unconstitutional then what
[01:12:44.720 --> 01:12:49.360]  happened last year the legislature finally got their butts in a lawsuit and
[01:12:49.360 --> 01:12:56.000]  had to repeal that title that entire chapter of the transportation code is
[01:12:56.000 --> 01:13:00.400]  now gone 708 of the Texas Transportation Code is repealed in its
[01:13:00.400 --> 01:13:08.320]  entirety as unconstitutional wow and I've been saying that for years yeah but
[01:13:08.320 --> 01:13:13.680]  yeah Stu for truth I've been wrong I don't know what I'm talking about you
[01:13:13.680 --> 01:13:22.240]  moron yeah no kid wow that's that's a nice nice to hear yeah so so Graves
[01:13:22.240 --> 01:13:26.680]  anyway I guess that's just between civil yeah and the only other thing I have
[01:13:26.680 --> 01:13:30.080]  against doctor I mean it teaches you a lot do not get me wrong it is a great
[01:13:30.080 --> 01:13:34.240]  great program if you've got to sue somebody or you're being sued you want
[01:13:34.240 --> 01:13:37.240]  it you want to understand all the procedure and everything that's in it
[01:13:37.240 --> 01:13:42.040]  you really really do and you need to know it but my biggest gripe about it is
[01:13:42.040 --> 01:13:47.120]  it does not teach you how to sue government officials that's the only
[01:13:47.120 --> 01:13:51.280]  part about it I absolutely don't like is it doesn't teach you how to deal with a
[01:13:51.280 --> 01:13:56.080]  government official who needs to be sued and should be sued in any way it only
[01:13:56.080 --> 01:14:00.800]  deals with individuals and businesses and corporations right yeah so if you
[01:14:00.800 --> 01:14:10.120]  don't address the dark side you know yeah which is kind of I would say the
[01:14:10.120 --> 01:14:15.280]  what is it the bar you could we could look at part of the dark side they're
[01:14:15.280 --> 01:14:20.880]  basically it feels like or what I've heard part of go the Texas State bars
[01:14:20.880 --> 01:14:24.840]  absolutely unconstitutional under the Texas Constitution it was illegal from
[01:14:24.840 --> 01:14:30.720]  day one they're like a tentacle you could almost say then huh oh they are they
[01:14:30.720 --> 01:14:34.960]  are a tentacle in every state of the Union and they all stem off the body of
[01:14:34.960 --> 01:14:42.040]  the National Bar Association so what's gonna you could that was my
[01:14:42.040 --> 01:14:51.280]  mythological question I'm going after private practice to back him off of my
[01:14:51.280 --> 01:14:58.760]  87-year-old again veteran father etc and I need materials that'll help me go
[01:14:58.760 --> 01:15:02.920]  after somebody like you know private practice I mean it's I is this a debt
[01:15:02.920 --> 01:15:07.920]  collection or a lawsuit the debt collection okay then you need two things
[01:15:07.920 --> 01:15:14.320]  you need Mike Myers material on debt collectors and make sure you understand
[01:15:14.320 --> 01:15:17.920]  the differences in what debt collectors are and what they aren't just because
[01:15:17.920 --> 01:15:21.240]  somebody's saying you owe me money that doesn't make them a debt collector if
[01:15:21.240 --> 01:15:28.760]  they are the original person that owned the property for which the debt was
[01:15:28.760 --> 01:15:35.360]  accrued they're not a debt collector when they're trying to get paid okay so make
[01:15:35.360 --> 01:15:39.880]  sure you understand those legal distinctions because they do exist but
[01:15:39.880 --> 01:15:46.640]  Mike Michael mirrors is stuff on suing debt collectors that's on the website you
[01:15:46.640 --> 01:15:52.680]  can get that and then dr. Graves material for suing businesses corporations you
[01:15:52.680 --> 01:15:56.400]  can even use it to sue attorneys if that's who you're trying to sue as long
[01:15:56.400 --> 01:16:01.000]  as you do it according to the law so he will give you the general idea of how it
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:05.160]  all works and then you need to get look up the proper procedures and laws in the
[01:16:05.160 --> 01:16:10.920]  state you're in to make it actually applicable so it will specific because
[01:16:10.920 --> 01:16:15.680]  that he was an attorney stuff which kind of confused for 30 years in Florida so
[01:16:15.680 --> 01:16:20.720]  he everything he's talking about is based upon Florida law and federal law as
[01:16:20.720 --> 01:16:26.520]  practiced in Florida but he would write materials and there's nothing probably
[01:16:26.520 --> 01:16:32.320]  specific to going after a private practice attorney I would expect or you
[01:16:32.320 --> 01:16:36.800]  can sue a private attorney just like you can sue any other individual or
[01:16:36.800 --> 01:16:41.600]  business so there there's no problem he's not he doesn't have the government
[01:16:41.600 --> 01:16:46.400]  immunity just because he's an attorney even though here in Texas they actually
[01:16:46.400 --> 01:16:50.400]  do if you read the state bar act and that's part of the problem hang on just
[01:16:50.400 --> 01:16:53.720]  a second let me take this break we'll finish this up on the other side folks
[01:16:53.720 --> 01:16:57.080]  y'all hang on they're on the collar board I'll get the audits as quick as I
[01:16:57.080 --> 01:17:07.880]  can so y'all hold on it's the 2019 logos radio network annual fundraiser and gun
[01:17:07.880 --> 01:17:12.440]  giveaway sponsored by central Texas gunworks go to logos radio network
[01:17:12.440 --> 01:17:17.120]  calm and enter to win any amount is appreciated everything helps to keep
[01:17:17.120 --> 01:17:22.000]  us on the air from central Texas gunworks the grand prize up for grabs is
[01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:28.120]  a spikes tactical AR 15 more prizes and sponsors to be announced every $25
[01:17:28.120 --> 01:17:33.040]  donation is a chance to win when you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book legal
[01:17:33.040 --> 01:17:38.040]  101 you get four chances to win purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get
[01:17:38.040 --> 01:17:42.920]  10 chances to win if you've enjoyed the shows on logos radio network support
[01:17:42.920 --> 01:17:47.440]  our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk
[01:17:47.440 --> 01:17:52.680]  radio today we also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and remember every
[01:17:52.680 --> 01:17:58.120]  $25 donation is a chance to win go to logos radio network calm for details
[01:17:58.120 --> 01:18:03.520]  and donate today are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls
[01:18:03.520 --> 01:18:08.320]  letters or even lawsuits stop debt collectors now with the Michael mirrors
[01:18:08.320 --> 01:18:12.720]  proven method Michael mirrors has won six cases in federal court against debt
[01:18:12.720 --> 01:18:16.920]  collectors and now you can win too you'll get step-by-step instructions in
[01:18:16.920 --> 01:18:21.440]  plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute what
[01:18:21.440 --> 01:18:26.160]  to do when contacted by phone mail or court summons how to answer letters and
[01:18:26.160 --> 01:18:30.200]  phone calls how to get debt collectors out of your credit report how to turn the
[01:18:30.200 --> 01:18:35.080]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away the Michael mirrors
[01:18:35.080 --> 01:18:39.520]  proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors personal
[01:18:39.520 --> 01:18:43.600]  consultation is available as well for more information please visit rule of
[01:18:43.600 --> 01:18:48.160]  law radio calm and click on the blue Michael mirrors banner or email Michael
[01:18:48.160 --> 01:18:55.960]  mirrors at yahoo.com that's rule of law radio calm or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S
[01:18:55.960 --> 01:19:00.960]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now
[01:19:00.960 --> 01:19:22.600]  this is the Logos La Pogos Radio.net
[01:19:22.600 --> 01:19:27.120]  As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death I take a look at my life
[01:19:27.120 --> 01:19:32.000]  and realize it's touching up because I've been practicing and laughing so long that
[01:19:32.000 --> 01:19:38.440]  even my mama thinks that my mind is gone. Alright folks we are back this is rule of
[01:19:38.440 --> 01:19:43.940]  law radio the calling number 512-646-1984 we are talking to Chris in
[01:19:43.940 --> 01:19:50.320]  California. Alright Chris anyway like I say all those materials are useful Dr.
[01:19:50.320 --> 01:19:54.400]  Gray's material will teach you how to sue an attorney but you still have to
[01:19:54.400 --> 01:19:58.760]  know the law in your particular state where the lawsuit is going to be filed
[01:19:58.760 --> 01:20:03.680]  and adapt it to the material as Dr. Gray shows you how to do it he teaches you
[01:20:03.680 --> 01:20:07.000]  how to look up and follow the rules of procedure how to write motions and
[01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:12.040]  pleadings answers all that stuff that you need to know in a lawsuit because
[01:20:12.040 --> 01:20:14.880]  you're gonna file the lawsuit the attorney is going to turn around and
[01:20:14.880 --> 01:20:18.840]  file an answer then you're going to turn around and file another response to his
[01:20:18.840 --> 01:20:24.240]  answers okay then you've got to make sure that your initial complaint is so
[01:20:24.240 --> 01:20:28.640]  airtight that he can't get it dismissed on any factual basis you have to write
[01:20:28.640 --> 01:20:34.760]  it in such a way that there is always a fact of law that the jury must decide so
[01:20:34.760 --> 01:20:38.400]  the judge can't simply dismiss it for failure to stay the claim you see what
[01:20:38.400 --> 01:20:43.520]  I'm saying yeah it does it include dealing in grievances and writing
[01:20:43.520 --> 01:20:48.360]  grievances and complaints rather than complaints no it doesn't tell you anything
[01:20:48.360 --> 01:20:51.720]  except how to conduct the lawsuit it doesn't tell you anything about filing
[01:20:51.720 --> 01:20:55.800]  bar grievances or anything like that but there's lots of stuff available in your
[01:20:55.800 --> 01:21:02.040]  state on the bar association websites and probably independent sites go to
[01:21:02.040 --> 01:21:06.360]  legal aid if nowhere else and ask them to help you understand the process of
[01:21:06.360 --> 01:21:10.800]  filing a bar grievance against an attorney or anybody else for that matter
[01:21:10.800 --> 01:21:17.520]  we're right I've spoken to some other compatriots of you guys who well I'm
[01:21:17.520 --> 01:21:21.960]  not talking about just us you've got resources available most of the time most
[01:21:21.960 --> 01:21:25.640]  if you live anywhere near a large city most of them have a legal aid society
[01:21:25.640 --> 01:21:31.160]  does it cost you anything to go talk to an attorney right but I mean in terms of
[01:21:31.160 --> 01:21:35.600]  the complaints and what our state specifically is doing that that's a
[01:21:35.600 --> 01:21:39.600]  little harder you pretty much got to walk that walk before you know what
[01:21:39.600 --> 01:21:43.840]  because what I'm hearing is is they're lumping together grievances and putting
[01:21:43.840 --> 01:21:46.360]  them into one and then they're even calling them they're not even calling
[01:21:46.360 --> 01:21:49.440]  grievances and complaints anymore they're just saying that's like a
[01:21:49.440 --> 01:21:54.000]  information or they're you know you just yeah they're trying to gloss over to
[01:21:54.000 --> 01:21:57.680]  protect themselves to make it where their dirty laundry is not being publicly
[01:21:57.680 --> 01:22:02.320]  viewed this was the whole reason one of the reasons why I wanted to do my
[01:22:02.320 --> 01:22:08.440]  website was so that we could file bar grievances against attorneys using our
[01:22:08.440 --> 01:22:12.760]  website you would come in you would fill it out you'd put all your information
[01:22:12.760 --> 01:22:16.840]  all of their information we'd make the whole complaint we'd format it into a
[01:22:16.840 --> 01:22:22.280]  formal document which we would then submit through email and through postal
[01:22:22.280 --> 01:22:30.240]  mail with verified receipt and then all of that information could be looked up
[01:22:30.240 --> 01:22:36.280]  on our website since once it goes into the bar's hand it becomes secret so here
[01:22:36.280 --> 01:22:39.920]  people could actually come to our website and see whether or not attorneys
[01:22:39.920 --> 01:22:46.400]  had a grievance filed against you and why the every little detail of it this
[01:22:46.400 --> 01:22:51.760]  would put us so far ahead of the curve on catching these criminals in the act
[01:22:51.760 --> 01:22:58.760]  it's not even funnier but the insurance companies can see it the insurance
[01:22:58.760 --> 01:23:02.240]  companies aren't going to worry about it as long as the insurance companies are
[01:23:02.240 --> 01:23:07.840]  collecting money see I'm not so sure about Randy's three strikes your outrule
[01:23:07.840 --> 01:23:13.680]  when it comes to malpractice insurance I haven't ever seen that written anywhere
[01:23:13.680 --> 01:23:18.120]  he said it that's true and I'm trying to knock him for it but the fact of the
[01:23:18.120 --> 01:23:22.480]  matter is I believe in things that I can prove in black and white when it comes
[01:23:22.480 --> 01:23:27.040]  to this legal stuff and there I've never seen it in black and white that a
[01:23:27.040 --> 01:23:31.600]  malpractice insurance entity will withdraw insurance on the third
[01:23:31.600 --> 01:23:36.040]  complaint against an attorney I've never seen it this this is where I'm coming
[01:23:36.040 --> 01:23:40.360]  from to this is why I've got to be careful well this is why asking someone in
[01:23:40.360 --> 01:23:45.240]  legal aid who would actually know what happens if you get bar grieved what
[01:23:45.240 --> 01:23:50.280]  that what happens to your malpractice insurance what does your aid does your
[01:23:50.280 --> 01:23:55.360]  malpractice insurer have a policy on how they handle this or is there some law or
[01:23:55.360 --> 01:23:59.160]  written procedure on how they have to handle it if you get X number of
[01:23:59.160 --> 01:24:03.800]  complaints against you as long as you're not going after them they're probably
[01:24:03.800 --> 01:24:07.720]  going to be more and happy to answer that question for you and this is again
[01:24:07.720 --> 01:24:14.760]  and I've got to look up in my state again to find these people well that they
[01:24:14.760 --> 01:24:18.120]  would know the law that may be particular there may be a particular law in
[01:24:18.120 --> 01:24:21.880]  your state that doesn't exist somewhere else so yeah you want the laws for your
[01:24:21.880 --> 01:24:27.640]  state no I mean which like a paralegal who might who might chase them down to
[01:24:27.640 --> 01:24:33.120]  get that information again the legal aid society which is a clinic a law clinic
[01:24:33.120 --> 01:24:38.200]  it's it's volunteer attorneys helping people with legal issues volunteer law
[01:24:38.200 --> 01:24:42.680]  students helping people with legal issues and as far as you know they're in
[01:24:42.680 --> 01:24:50.480]  most the states most most big cities in states have one okay that would be a
[01:24:50.480 --> 01:24:55.120]  good place to start cuz ten minutes of your time to go through my email and
[01:24:55.120 --> 01:25:00.640]  I'm trying to figure out you know just to hear you say I don't know I mean I'm
[01:25:00.640 --> 01:25:04.280]  okay with well when it comes to a particular law in a particular state I
[01:25:04.280 --> 01:25:09.040]  know Texas very well I know some other states kind of well and I know others
[01:25:09.040 --> 01:25:15.160]  not at all there's no way one person that's not data from Star Trek can know
[01:25:15.160 --> 01:25:19.480]  every statute in every code in every state no no that's that's again not
[01:25:19.480 --> 01:25:25.400]  where I'm at I'm just trying to get a general idea of this guy is is worth
[01:25:25.400 --> 01:25:30.600]  because he he's a little intimidated by me and I haven't let him know where I'm
[01:25:30.600 --> 01:25:36.600]  coming from yet and before I do I want to be prepared and just to get a general
[01:25:36.600 --> 01:25:42.200]  idea of how I can and this is all going to be a you know intimidation move
[01:25:42.200 --> 01:25:48.080]  because I am I'm a trainer in my background and that's how you deal with
[01:25:48.080 --> 01:25:54.800]  with folks is have basically what you guys you know be prepared to present
[01:25:54.800 --> 01:26:00.040]  your your case and that will put fear of God hopefully into him he already has
[01:26:00.040 --> 01:26:04.520]  that for me I've already mentioned about grievance early on but he would he
[01:26:04.520 --> 01:26:09.760]  said that I have to be in contract with him before I can can bar grieve him no
[01:26:09.760 --> 01:26:15.040]  that's wrong that's dead wrong he told me already that's not the case so there
[01:26:15.040 --> 01:26:22.080]  was one right there so there's a number of different things that in that 10
[01:26:22.080 --> 01:26:25.680]  minutes worth or I'm assuming 10 minutes worth of reading that just basic
[01:26:25.680 --> 01:26:28.720]  stuff we said yeah you know it looks like it's worth for selling or not or
[01:26:28.720 --> 01:26:34.000]  whatever I mean you know I don't know what a good figure is to donate to you
[01:26:34.000 --> 01:26:38.920]  to get that far but I mean this is all that all you have to say yeah I'd go
[01:26:38.920 --> 01:26:43.120]  after him and then that's that's it the rest is going to be on well unfortunately
[01:26:43.120 --> 01:26:49.200]  I don't have the means or the time to go after individual cases like that for
[01:26:49.200 --> 01:26:54.000]  people especially when it comes to doing lawsuits and writing all those documents
[01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:58.440]  and everything else I don't have time to do all that I've got so much work I've
[01:26:58.440 --> 01:27:02.520]  already got for the people that are local here that I'm trying to help out plus
[01:27:02.520 --> 01:27:07.680]  the redoing of the seminar material I mean no opposite of what I'm saying now
[01:27:07.680 --> 01:27:13.800]  you misunderstand me oh okay well I must be I'm sorry I but in any case my point
[01:27:13.800 --> 01:27:18.560]  being that every this is stuff that they should be teaching everyone in school
[01:27:18.560 --> 01:27:26.080]  and they're not for a reason and have they done that society would not be
[01:27:26.080 --> 01:27:32.440]  enslaved to the attorneys the way it is right now but that's how the system was
[01:27:32.440 --> 01:27:38.240]  set up to make us make us dependent upon them to get the information that they
[01:27:38.240 --> 01:27:43.840]  themselves concoct for instance what that attorney said to you oh you could
[01:27:43.840 --> 01:27:48.120]  only bar grieve me if you're in contract with me no that's not true where did you
[01:27:48.120 --> 01:27:53.280]  ever come up with that idea I can bar grieve you because I don't like the way
[01:27:53.280 --> 01:27:58.680]  you part your hair I can bar grieve you because I saw you berating your client
[01:27:58.680 --> 01:28:07.000]  in a public place I can bar grieve you for anything anytime I want now you may
[01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:11.040]  be right that the bar association won't do anything with it unless I'm
[01:28:11.040 --> 01:28:22.200]  contracted with you but the fact is I can do it whether I am or not so certified
[01:28:22.200 --> 01:28:28.000]  male and email to send in complaints and then I probably would need language in
[01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:32.960]  there in my state to distinguish between complaints well again a bar
[01:28:32.960 --> 01:28:40.200]  grievance every bar agency has its own little form for filing bar grievances
[01:28:40.200 --> 01:28:44.960]  all you got to do is go on their website download the form or look at how it's set
[01:28:44.960 --> 01:28:50.880]  up online if it will show you the entire form at once and see what kind of
[01:28:50.880 --> 01:28:58.680]  information they're going to be asking you for then you'll know and then to get
[01:28:58.680 --> 01:29:02.840]  to the next level would be ineffectiveness of counsel for example
[01:29:02.840 --> 01:29:06.760]  well you can only do ineffective assistance of counsel if they're your
[01:29:06.760 --> 01:29:11.720]  counsel there he is correct you have to be contracted with him or he has to be
[01:29:11.720 --> 01:29:17.120]  appointed to you by a court as a public defender or public caseworker in order
[01:29:17.120 --> 01:29:23.840]  for that to be true would that apply if I have durable power of attorney for the
[01:29:23.840 --> 01:29:30.600]  elder father would that apply to me could I be able to file that type of a
[01:29:30.600 --> 01:29:34.960]  complaint if I'm your your father can give you power of attorney to act on
[01:29:34.960 --> 01:29:41.520]  his behalf in this case okay then you can go to court with him and talk for him
[01:29:41.520 --> 01:29:44.800]  and everything else because you have that power of attorney to handle his
[01:29:44.800 --> 01:29:50.000]  legal affairs so that would if I could file those types of complaints then and
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:59.760]  absolutely and so hang on man I got another break here hang on thank you
[01:29:59.920 --> 01:30:04.320]  it seems like everywhere you turn nowadays someone wants your name social
[01:30:04.320 --> 01:30:07.600]  security number and date of birth but you should think twice before giving away
[01:30:07.600 --> 01:30:11.440]  your personal data I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a
[01:30:11.440 --> 01:30:16.400]  moment Google is watching you recording everything you've ever searched for and
[01:30:16.400 --> 01:30:20.880]  creating a massive database of your personal information that's crazy but
[01:30:20.880 --> 01:30:25.080]  it doesn't have to be that way start page comm is the world's most private
[01:30:25.080 --> 01:30:29.240]  search engine start page comm doesn't store your IP address make a record of
[01:30:29.240 --> 01:30:33.080]  your searches or use tracking cookies and their third-party certified if you
[01:30:33.080 --> 01:30:37.680]  don't like big brother spying on you start over with start page great search
[01:30:37.680 --> 01:30:42.360]  results and total privacy start page comm the world's most private search
[01:30:42.360 --> 01:30:46.640]  engine forms forms forms they're everywhere but just because a piece of
[01:30:46.640 --> 01:30:50.800]  paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it I laid blank spaces
[01:30:50.800 --> 01:30:55.280]  on forms all the time or I write n slash a for not applicable and usually
[01:30:55.280 --> 01:30:59.720]  nobody notices or cares I never give my social security number or date of birth
[01:30:59.720 --> 01:31:03.680]  unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement
[01:31:03.680 --> 01:31:07.520]  and I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I
[01:31:07.520 --> 01:31:10.640]  actually want them to call me and that's pretty rare to preserve our
[01:31:10.640 --> 01:31:15.200]  vanishing privacy we need to practice saying no to random data requests it's
[01:31:15.200 --> 01:31:19.760]  like exercising a muscle it gets easier the more you do it I'm Dr. Katherine
[01:31:19.760 --> 01:31:24.880]  Albrecht more news and information at Catherine Albrecht.com
[01:31:24.880 --> 01:31:37.280]  I lost my son my uncle my son on September 11th 2000 most people don't
[01:31:37.280 --> 01:31:41.920]  know that a third tower fell on September 11th World Trade Center 7 a 47
[01:31:41.920 --> 01:31:46.560]  story skyscraper was not hit by a plane the official explanation is that fire
[01:31:46.560 --> 01:31:51.120]  brought down building 7 over 1200 architects and engineers has looked
[01:31:51.120 --> 01:31:54.880]  into the evidence and believed there's more to the story bring justice to my
[01:31:54.880 --> 01:32:00.240]  son my uncle my nephew my son go to building what dot org why it fell why it
[01:32:00.240 --> 01:32:05.520]  matters and what you can do rule of law radio is proud to offer the rule of law
[01:32:05.520 --> 01:32:09.200]  traffic seminar in today's America we live in a mess against them society if we
[01:32:09.200 --> 01:32:12.000]  the people are ever going to have a free society then we're going to have to
[01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:15.600]  stand and defend our own rights among those rights are the right to travel
[01:32:15.600 --> 01:32:18.760]  freely from place to place the right to act in our own private capacity and most
[01:32:18.760 --> 01:32:22.520]  importantly the right to do process of law traffic courts afford us the least
[01:32:22.520 --> 01:32:25.880]  expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through
[01:32:25.880 --> 01:32:29.480]  due process former sheriff's deputy eddie craig in conjunction with rule of law
[01:32:29.480 --> 01:32:32.200]  radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[01:32:32.200 --> 01:32:35.800]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the
[01:32:35.800 --> 01:32:39.160]  rule of law you can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to
[01:32:39.160 --> 01:32:42.760]  rule of law radio dot com and ordering your copy today by ordering now you'll
[01:32:42.760 --> 01:32:46.080]  receive a copy of eddie's book the texas transportation code the law versus the
[01:32:46.080 --> 01:32:50.280]  lie video and audio of the original 2009 seminar hundreds of research documents
[01:32:50.280 --> 01:32:53.400]  and other useful resource material learn how to fight for your rights with the
[01:32:53.400 --> 01:32:56.960]  help of this material from rule of law radio dot com order your copy today and
[01:32:56.960 --> 01:33:01.760]  together we can have a free society we all want to and deserve
[01:33:01.760 --> 01:33:14.200]  you're listening to the logo's radio network at logo's radio network dot com
[01:33:31.760 --> 01:33:44.240]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio we got a half an hour
[01:33:44.240 --> 01:33:48.000]  left in the show and we're gonna see if we can wrap this up with chris so we
[01:33:48.000 --> 01:33:51.560]  can get to these other guys are still on here all right chris let's see we can
[01:33:51.560 --> 01:33:57.080]  wrap this up shall we you bet yeah before we open that before I open the
[01:33:57.080 --> 01:34:04.920]  can of worms of actually filing complaints and and that kind of thing all
[01:34:04.920 --> 01:34:11.840]  these tactics I'm focusing on are to put the fear of God if it's possible into
[01:34:11.840 --> 01:34:19.160]  him that I'm serious through either grievances but also would it help to
[01:34:19.160 --> 01:34:23.560]  get other people that were involved in the situation whether it be an accountant
[01:34:23.560 --> 01:34:30.880]  his accountant to to claim that they would also file you know grievance I
[01:34:30.880 --> 01:34:38.360]  also have phone recordings made of his conversations is there anything that you
[01:34:38.360 --> 01:34:42.840]  would tell me well first thing is make sure you know what the law is in your
[01:34:42.840 --> 01:34:49.080]  state about recording like that because again here in Texas it's a one-party
[01:34:49.080 --> 01:34:53.720]  state requirement only one party to the conversation has to know it's being
[01:34:53.720 --> 01:34:57.720]  recorded they don't have to tell the other party they don't have to they're
[01:34:57.720 --> 01:35:01.840]  not limited to any means of recording but if they're involved in the
[01:35:01.840 --> 01:35:06.080]  conversation only that person has to know about it so make sure that you're
[01:35:06.080 --> 01:35:10.800]  in a one-party state before you ever mentioned anything in writing that you
[01:35:10.800 --> 01:35:16.360]  got recordings okay and then in terms of him being the attorney there's also
[01:35:16.360 --> 01:35:22.440]  attorney client right that with that cross a line well again he's not your
[01:35:22.440 --> 01:35:26.600]  attorney so attorney client doesn't apply to you it applies to whatever client
[01:35:26.600 --> 01:35:30.600]  he's got if you're going after one of his clients if he's who you're going
[01:35:30.600 --> 01:35:42.240]  after who's the client nobody right so yeah so that's what I'm looking at
[01:35:42.240 --> 01:35:50.720]  before I dive into actually creating a an actual complaint lawsuit is to tell him
[01:35:50.720 --> 01:35:56.280]  luckily you know we're gonna you know be doing multiple grievances we're gonna
[01:35:56.280 --> 01:36:00.200]  have multiple people doing multiple grievances yeah just make sure that you
[01:36:00.200 --> 01:36:04.360]  have a sound basis for each grievance and it will become harder and harder to
[01:36:04.360 --> 01:36:11.160]  ignore them when that's the case and then separate them out put language in
[01:36:11.160 --> 01:36:18.560]  there saying that these are not the same etc etc I guess well the language is
[01:36:18.560 --> 01:36:25.320]  going to be relevant to dates times places and events so why would they all
[01:36:25.320 --> 01:36:29.520]  be the same in the first place you can't complain about the same thing 15 times
[01:36:29.520 --> 01:36:33.920]  you only need to complain about one thing once this is the tactic that the
[01:36:33.920 --> 01:36:37.880]  California bar apparently is using is just lumping them all into one complaint
[01:36:37.880 --> 01:36:43.640]  well file them separately and they can't do that well apparently they're doing it
[01:36:43.640 --> 01:36:48.200]  according to well they may they may lump them into one file of complaints
[01:36:48.200 --> 01:36:57.440]  relative to that attorney they may they may even take the the individual items
[01:36:57.440 --> 01:37:01.440]  in your complaint say okay here's the entire body how many of them are the
[01:37:01.440 --> 01:37:04.520]  same how many of them are different if they're all about the same stuff if
[01:37:04.520 --> 01:37:07.840]  they're not then they still have to keep each one of them separate even if they
[01:37:07.840 --> 01:37:15.760]  try to put them together each issue is still an issue and then in this state
[01:37:15.760 --> 01:37:21.000]  regardless there basically you're saying no guarantee that any insurance
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:24.040]  company would get any catch any wind of these complaints then that's
[01:37:24.040 --> 01:37:28.600]  possibility to I guess right it's anything's a possibility unless you have
[01:37:28.600 --> 01:37:33.240]  black-letter law to say that's not the way it works and that's what you're
[01:37:33.240 --> 01:37:41.640]  looking for if it exists that the since attorneys control all the state
[01:37:41.640 --> 01:37:46.680]  legislators or legislators they're the most numerous person in the state
[01:37:46.680 --> 01:37:51.440]  legislature therefore they control it they control the judiciary they have
[01:37:51.440 --> 01:37:56.000]  the major offices in the executive they control the government so I'm betting
[01:37:56.000 --> 01:38:00.800]  there is no black-letter law that would allow you to lock them into such
[01:38:00.800 --> 01:38:07.880]  situations in the first place there may be but you need to look for and find out
[01:38:07.880 --> 01:38:15.920]  then you would still recommend grieving absolutely a record's a record so all I
[01:38:15.920 --> 01:38:19.640]  need to figure out and I guess the only way to get there is to do it is how he's
[01:38:19.640 --> 01:38:24.680]  gonna respond if he you don't care how he responds to a bar grievance there's
[01:38:24.680 --> 01:38:29.040]  nothing he can sue you for in a bar grievance I mean it's the threat of it
[01:38:29.040 --> 01:38:38.120]  because remember we're trying to not okay rule one never threaten just do never
[01:38:38.120 --> 01:38:47.400]  threaten just do it and get it done to the attorney specifically to anyone when
[01:38:47.400 --> 01:38:54.440]  it comes to government of any kind or attorneys don't say hey I'll cut you some
[01:38:54.440 --> 01:38:57.760]  slack if you're willing to go blah blah blah because you're always going to get
[01:38:57.760 --> 01:39:04.040]  the crappy end of the stick in that deal guaranteed so don't even mention to him
[01:39:04.040 --> 01:39:08.440]  that I'm going to start a grieving problem no just do it you don't need the
[01:39:08.440 --> 01:39:16.800]  warning just do it so the whole idea of staying look if you if you take the bill
[01:39:16.800 --> 01:39:24.200]  down no because then you're negotiating either he's right or he's wrong which is
[01:39:24.200 --> 01:39:33.520]  it well wrong obviously okay then stop negotiating to make him half right and
[01:39:33.760 --> 01:39:39.760]  it would be helpful to you know if you just glossed over that thing and you
[01:39:39.760 --> 01:39:45.000]  could see you know it's probably pretty apparent I would think to someone it has
[01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:49.960]  experience with this kind of thing but without a figure I don't know what you
[01:39:49.960 --> 01:39:55.760]  know what do you mean without a figure without a figure of what it I mean just
[01:39:55.760 --> 01:40:02.640]  for you to read the email okay what is the email I'm looking for what email
[01:40:02.640 --> 01:40:08.400]  address did it come from well online I'm not sure I want to well just give me the
[01:40:08.400 --> 01:40:22.200]  first couple letters of it AMER I okay and it was you had me put California
[01:40:22.200 --> 01:40:37.760]  complaint question I think I remember on the subject line let's see because my
[01:40:37.760 --> 01:40:45.600]  whole the angle was going to be to say look you know because we're talking
[01:40:45.600 --> 01:40:54.720]  very you know politely and I'm usually pretty good at conversation in that
[01:40:54.720 --> 01:41:01.360]  regard okay well let me let me see if I can find the email I've got a list of
[01:41:01.360 --> 01:41:07.120]  five up here that have that beginning on the email but I can't say which one's
[01:41:07.120 --> 01:41:16.160]  yours I'd have to look but from what I'm seeing I don't see it I don't have
[01:41:16.160 --> 01:41:19.440]  anything which email address did you send it to to me
[01:41:19.440 --> 01:41:27.960]  Eddie Craig at rule of law oh yeah it's just Eddie at rule of law radio calm
[01:41:27.960 --> 01:41:34.960]  that's the orange okay then I'll look but at the moment I'm only seeing five and I
[01:41:34.960 --> 01:41:41.680]  guarantee you none of these five are from you based upon just what the title of
[01:41:41.680 --> 01:41:49.520]  them are okay because that's to correct it what I corrected you earlier that all
[01:41:49.520 --> 01:42:00.600]  I'm looking for is it just a gift okay edd ie at rule of law radio calm send it
[01:42:00.600 --> 01:42:05.240]  again and I'll be looking for it it's made it to Randy he already replied it
[01:42:05.240 --> 01:42:09.840]  made it to oh well I don't know what man made it Randy but it hadn't come to me
[01:42:09.840 --> 01:42:17.000]  I'm sitting here looking at my list it's not here so and he hasn't forwarded it
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:26.320]  to me would send it in again do anything or send it to me just to me edd ie at
[01:42:26.320 --> 01:42:33.000]  rule of law radio calm and in a subject line well what should I put in a subject
[01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:40.960]  line just put caller Chris ah that's a good I like that simple enough I can
[01:42:40.960 --> 01:42:45.440]  probably handle that well I'll do that again and it's just a gist I don't need
[01:42:45.440 --> 01:42:49.360]  you to spend the more maybe 10 or 15 minutes at the most just reading the
[01:42:49.360 --> 01:42:57.480]  thing yeah you don't know what you're asking but okay again this is the case
[01:42:57.480 --> 01:43:03.480]  this isn't the thing in the thinking in the tank and of a little traffic deal
[01:43:03.480 --> 01:43:07.200]  that's under a thousand this is something that's up to 30,000 now and so I get it
[01:43:07.200 --> 01:43:13.960]  I get it I'll look at it and see what I can see okay okay sir all right thanks
[01:43:13.960 --> 01:43:18.680]  for calling me hey you bet all right I got one more break and in one more
[01:43:18.680 --> 01:43:23.120]  segment so Mike and Indiana and John in New York y'all hold your horses and if
[01:43:23.120 --> 01:43:28.400]  I can get the both of you I will Mike and Indiana you are up next when we get
[01:43:28.400 --> 01:43:33.520]  back from this break so you guys hang on and I will do my very best to get the
[01:43:33.520 --> 01:43:39.920]  both of you all right in the meantime just please keep us in your financial
[01:43:39.920 --> 01:43:46.400]  means whenever you can folks I'm struggling here badly to make ends meet
[01:43:46.400 --> 01:43:51.520]  I'm behind on everything because I hardly get anything but it is what it is
[01:43:51.520 --> 01:43:58.960]  so if we can please donate y'all hang on we will be right back
[01:43:59.920 --> 01:44:05.280]  through advances in technology our lives have greatly improved except in the
[01:44:05.280 --> 01:44:09.560]  area of nutrition people feed their pets better than they feed themselves and
[01:44:09.560 --> 01:44:14.680]  it's time we changed all that our primary defense against aging and disease in
[01:44:14.680 --> 01:44:19.640]  this toxic environment is good nutrition in a world where natural foods have been
[01:44:19.640 --> 01:44:24.920]  irradiated adulterated and mutilated young Jevity can provide the nutrients
[01:44:24.920 --> 01:44:29.880]  you need Logos radio network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products
[01:44:29.880 --> 01:44:35.280]  most of which we reject we have come to trust young Jevity so much we became a
[01:44:35.280 --> 01:44:40.400]  marketing distributor along with Alex Jones bin fuchs and many others when
[01:44:40.400 --> 01:44:45.760]  you order from Logos radio network comm your health will improve as you help
[01:44:45.760 --> 01:44:51.160]  support quality radio as you realize the benefits of young Jevity you may want to
[01:44:51.160 --> 01:44:55.960]  join us as a distributor you can experience improved health help your
[01:44:55.960 --> 01:45:02.320]  friends and family and increase your income order now are you the plaintiff
[01:45:02.320 --> 01:45:06.800]  or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney with jurors
[01:45:06.800 --> 01:45:11.880]  dictionary the affordable easy to understand for CD course that will show
[01:45:11.880 --> 01:45:17.960]  you how in 24 hours step-by-step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer
[01:45:17.960 --> 01:45:22.120]  should be doing if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for
[01:45:22.120 --> 01:45:27.640]  yourself thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too
[01:45:27.640 --> 01:45:32.920]  jurisdiction area was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case
[01:45:32.920 --> 01:45:37.920]  winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone
[01:45:37.920 --> 01:45:42.680]  should understand about the principles and practices that control our American
[01:45:42.680 --> 01:45:48.720]  courts you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for
[01:45:48.720 --> 01:45:55.000]  civil cases pro se tactics and much more please visit rule of law radio dot com
[01:45:55.000 --> 01:46:03.800]  and click on the banner or call toll free 866 law easy
[01:46:25.340 --> 01:46:27.340]  oh
[01:46:27.340 --> 01:46:39.340]  Bad as a bone, bad as a bone
[01:46:39.340 --> 01:46:43.340]  I broke a thousand hearts, people I made you
[01:46:43.340 --> 01:46:48.340]  I'll break a thousand more, baby, people I am too
[01:46:48.340 --> 01:46:53.340]  I wanna be yours pretty baby, yours and yours alone
[01:46:53.340 --> 01:46:58.340]  I'm here to take your heart out, but I'm bad as a bone
[01:46:58.340 --> 01:47:10.340]  Bad as a bone, bad as a bone
[01:47:28.340 --> 01:47:40.340]  All right folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio
[01:47:40.340 --> 01:47:43.340]  We are now in the last segment of this show
[01:47:43.340 --> 01:47:47.340]  And we have Mike in Indiana
[01:47:47.340 --> 01:47:49.340]  Mike, what can we do for you?
[01:47:49.340 --> 01:47:52.340]  Actually, I'm in Arizona currently
[01:47:52.340 --> 01:47:55.340]  Oh, you are? Well, Mike and Dolan is
[01:47:55.340 --> 01:47:58.340]  It's all right this time of year
[01:47:58.340 --> 01:48:01.340]  But keep it short and sweet
[01:48:01.340 --> 01:48:03.340]  I have a bunch of free time ahead of me
[01:48:03.340 --> 01:48:06.340]  And I'm trying to get back into this stuff a little bit
[01:48:06.340 --> 01:48:09.340]  And just if you could give me kind of an easy
[01:48:09.340 --> 01:48:13.340]  Or layman's way of going about taking a title
[01:48:13.340 --> 01:48:15.340]  For example, I'm looking at Title 28
[01:48:15.340 --> 01:48:17.340]  Of the Arizona Revised Statutes
[01:48:17.340 --> 01:48:20.340]  Which is a transportation related title
[01:48:20.340 --> 01:48:23.340]  And go to a library and trace it back
[01:48:23.340 --> 01:48:25.340]  To the initial legislative enactment
[01:48:25.340 --> 01:48:27.340]  So I can get a clearer picture
[01:48:27.340 --> 01:48:29.340]  Of what they're actually
[01:48:29.340 --> 01:48:32.340]  Well, remember, the enactment has a history
[01:48:32.340 --> 01:48:36.340]  It's not just the last revision of it, it's got a history
[01:48:36.340 --> 01:48:38.340]  If you really want to truly understand
[01:48:38.340 --> 01:48:42.340]  The purpose of the legislation through its history
[01:48:42.340 --> 01:48:46.340]  You need to see the very first time it was enacted as well
[01:48:46.340 --> 01:48:52.340]  And read what the subject matter of it was intended to be
[01:48:52.340 --> 01:48:54.340]  And how that should have carried forward and everything
[01:48:54.340 --> 01:48:58.340]  Because every state that I'm aware of
[01:48:58.340 --> 01:49:01.340]  Has a provision in their constitution that says
[01:49:01.340 --> 01:49:03.340]  You cannot, it basically says
[01:49:03.340 --> 01:49:07.340]  You cannot amend the law by amending the statute
[01:49:07.340 --> 01:49:11.340]  If you want to change the law to a different subject
[01:49:11.340 --> 01:49:14.340]  Or to encompass something else
[01:49:14.340 --> 01:49:17.340]  Then you have to repeal the existing law
[01:49:17.340 --> 01:49:21.340]  And reenact it with the new subject matter in place
[01:49:21.340 --> 01:49:24.340]  So you need to look and see if that's ever been done
[01:49:24.340 --> 01:49:26.340]  If it's ever changed subject matter
[01:49:26.340 --> 01:49:28.340]  Because if that hasn't happened
[01:49:28.340 --> 01:49:31.340]  Then what it was the very first time it was done
[01:49:31.340 --> 01:49:34.340]  Is what it applies to today
[01:49:34.340 --> 01:49:40.340]  And it cannot change through statutory revision history
[01:49:40.340 --> 01:49:42.340]  For instance, here in Texas
[01:49:42.340 --> 01:49:44.340]  All current revisions of statutes
[01:49:44.340 --> 01:49:50.340]  Are still based upon the same 1925 legislative acts
[01:49:50.340 --> 01:49:54.340]  They just keep expanding them through statutory language
[01:49:54.340 --> 01:49:56.340]  But what they cannot do
[01:49:56.340 --> 01:50:00.340]  Is expand the subject matter reach to go beyond
[01:50:00.340 --> 01:50:05.340]  What the 1925 statutes originally set it up to be
[01:50:05.340 --> 01:50:10.340]  Okay
[01:50:10.340 --> 01:50:13.340]  So with that being said
[01:50:13.340 --> 01:50:17.340]  My first step I would guess is getting down to the law library
[01:50:17.340 --> 01:50:19.340]  Right, the law library will have the actual books
[01:50:19.340 --> 01:50:22.340]  The actual books will have the history keys
[01:50:22.340 --> 01:50:24.340]  The history keys will be what leads you back
[01:50:24.340 --> 01:50:28.340]  Through each successive revision of the book
[01:50:28.340 --> 01:50:31.340]  Which contains the previous version of the law
[01:50:31.340 --> 01:50:34.340]  Which in turn will track you all the way back
[01:50:34.340 --> 01:50:38.340]  To the beginning of that law
[01:50:38.340 --> 01:50:41.340]  And all of that's in code keys
[01:50:41.340 --> 01:50:45.340]  Either in columns in the book next to the statutes
[01:50:45.340 --> 01:50:47.340]  Or underneath the statutes
[01:50:47.340 --> 01:50:50.340]  In a reference section
[01:50:50.340 --> 01:50:53.340]  And so the librarian can explain how it all works
[01:50:53.340 --> 01:50:56.340]  Because they revised that system as well
[01:50:56.340 --> 01:50:58.340]  On how they organized these things
[01:50:58.340 --> 01:51:02.340]  And one code will have it this way during this period of years
[01:51:02.340 --> 01:51:05.340]  And then it'll go and it had it this way
[01:51:05.340 --> 01:51:07.340]  In the previous period of years
[01:51:07.340 --> 01:51:10.340]  So you gotta know how to make those transitions as well
[01:51:10.340 --> 01:51:12.340]  So you can keep following it backwards
[01:51:12.340 --> 01:51:16.340]  But the law library folks here are extremely helpful
[01:51:16.340 --> 01:51:19.340]  In explaining how all that works and showing you
[01:51:19.340 --> 01:51:22.340]  And even actually doing research for you over the phone
[01:51:22.340 --> 01:51:24.340]  And by email
[01:51:24.340 --> 01:51:26.340]  You can send them an email or a phone request
[01:51:26.340 --> 01:51:29.340]  For information about what you need looked up
[01:51:29.340 --> 01:51:31.340]  Or back tracked
[01:51:31.340 --> 01:51:34.340]  And they will usually do it for free
[01:51:34.340 --> 01:51:37.340]  And send you the stuff in an email
[01:51:37.340 --> 01:51:39.340]  Okay
[01:51:39.340 --> 01:51:42.340]  In your experience
[01:51:42.340 --> 01:51:44.340]  Because I have two I can choose from
[01:51:44.340 --> 01:51:46.340]  There's the state and then there's the
[01:51:46.340 --> 01:51:49.340]  I guess the state college that has a law school
[01:51:49.340 --> 01:51:51.340]  What one is usually a better
[01:51:51.340 --> 01:51:54.340]  Well again a law school is not necessary
[01:51:54.340 --> 01:51:57.340]  A fully equipped law library
[01:51:57.340 --> 01:52:00.340]  A state law library will have every legal publication
[01:52:00.340 --> 01:52:02.340]  That's ever been done in the state
[01:52:02.340 --> 01:52:06.340]  A law school may only have a certain subset of that information
[01:52:06.340 --> 01:52:09.340]  But there are no way or unless they are
[01:52:09.340 --> 01:52:11.340]  The law library for the state
[01:52:11.340 --> 01:52:14.340]  Or a federal book repository like SFA
[01:52:14.340 --> 01:52:17.340]  Is in Nacogdoches where I'm from
[01:52:17.340 --> 01:52:20.340]  They are not going to have the entire set of laws
[01:52:20.340 --> 01:52:22.340]  They're only going to have a subset of them
[01:52:22.340 --> 01:52:25.340]  And usually it's going to be the most current
[01:52:25.340 --> 01:52:27.340]  Okay
[01:52:27.340 --> 01:52:30.340]  So you can check with them and see what they have
[01:52:30.340 --> 01:52:32.340]  But most likely you're going to want to find
[01:52:32.340 --> 01:52:34.340]  Your state law library and use them
[01:52:34.340 --> 01:52:36.340]  Because they will be the largest resource base
[01:52:36.340 --> 01:52:39.340]  For all the original books
[01:52:39.340 --> 01:52:41.340]  Okay
[01:52:41.340 --> 01:52:43.340]  And since for example
[01:52:43.340 --> 01:52:46.340]  The title 28 of the Arizona revised statute
[01:52:46.340 --> 01:52:48.340]  You know it's got like 30 chapters
[01:52:48.340 --> 01:52:50.340]  Some of which aren't like
[01:52:50.340 --> 01:52:53.340]  Bonding issues for construction of bridges
[01:52:53.340 --> 01:52:55.340]  And so forth
[01:52:55.340 --> 01:52:58.340]  I should probably focus on the ones that are
[01:52:58.340 --> 01:53:01.340]  Ideally related to motor vehicles and things
[01:53:01.340 --> 01:53:04.340]  But I also know like for example the income tax
[01:53:04.340 --> 01:53:07.340]  Things aren't necessarily categorized
[01:53:07.340 --> 01:53:10.340]  In the way you think they would be
[01:53:10.340 --> 01:53:12.340]  So there could be relevance
[01:53:12.340 --> 01:53:15.340]  Well federal statute is a lot different
[01:53:15.340 --> 01:53:17.340]  Than state statute and how they write it
[01:53:17.340 --> 01:53:19.340]  For instance federal statutes
[01:53:19.340 --> 01:53:22.340]  Intentionally try to hide a lot of stuff
[01:53:22.340 --> 01:53:24.340]  That's why most federal codes
[01:53:24.340 --> 01:53:26.340]  You start reading the code
[01:53:26.340 --> 01:53:28.340]  And there's no definition for the word you're reading
[01:53:28.340 --> 01:53:30.340]  Why?
[01:53:30.340 --> 01:53:32.340]  Because they put the definition somewhere else
[01:53:32.340 --> 01:53:35.340]  Not in the code in the same chapter necessarily
[01:53:35.340 --> 01:53:38.340]  But if they do they almost always put them
[01:53:38.340 --> 01:53:40.340]  At the bottom of the statutory scheme
[01:53:40.340 --> 01:53:42.340]  Rather than at the top
[01:53:42.340 --> 01:53:44.340]  Here in Texas they're all at the top
[01:53:44.340 --> 01:53:46.340]  So you know what the words mean
[01:53:46.340 --> 01:53:48.340]  Before you actually get to the statutes
[01:53:48.340 --> 01:53:50.340]  To start reading them
[01:53:50.340 --> 01:53:52.340]  Now that's not to say that those are the only
[01:53:52.340 --> 01:53:54.340]  Words you need to know
[01:53:54.340 --> 01:53:56.340]  It also doesn't mean that those statutes
[01:53:56.340 --> 01:53:58.340]  Are the only subject
[01:53:58.340 --> 01:54:00.340]  You need to know and understand
[01:54:00.340 --> 01:54:03.340]  Like I told
[01:54:03.340 --> 01:54:05.340]  The first caller
[01:54:05.340 --> 01:54:07.340]  The statutes
[01:54:07.340 --> 01:54:09.340]  Will be involved in many different codes
[01:54:09.340 --> 01:54:11.340]  For you to complete the picture
[01:54:11.340 --> 01:54:13.340]  You'll get a general idea from one code
[01:54:13.340 --> 01:54:15.340]  About who does what
[01:54:15.340 --> 01:54:17.340]  And what the things they're doing are supposed to be
[01:54:17.340 --> 01:54:19.340]  And how they're supposed to do them
[01:54:19.340 --> 01:54:21.340]  But you won't get a complete picture
[01:54:21.340 --> 01:54:24.340]  About authority
[01:54:24.340 --> 01:54:26.340]  Application and blah blah blah
[01:54:26.340 --> 01:54:29.340]  Until you do your actual historical research
[01:54:29.340 --> 01:54:31.340]  Look at the actual bill that created it
[01:54:31.340 --> 01:54:33.340]  To know what the subject matter was
[01:54:33.340 --> 01:54:35.340]  That it's limited to
[01:54:35.340 --> 01:54:37.340]  And then what the other codes
[01:54:37.340 --> 01:54:39.340]  That exist in relation to those statutes
[01:54:39.340 --> 01:54:41.340]  Say about it
[01:54:41.340 --> 01:54:43.340]  Like I told him here in Texas
[01:54:43.340 --> 01:54:45.340]  When you look up anything dealing with
[01:54:45.340 --> 01:54:47.340]  Transportation you've got to look in
[01:54:47.340 --> 01:54:49.340]  Not only in the transportation code in specific chapters
[01:54:49.340 --> 01:54:51.340]  You've got to look in Title 37
[01:54:51.340 --> 01:54:53.340]  Of the administrative code
[01:54:53.340 --> 01:54:55.340]  You've got to look in the occupations code
[01:54:55.340 --> 01:54:57.340]  You've got to look in the state government code
[01:54:57.340 --> 01:54:59.340]  You've got to look in the local government code
[01:54:59.340 --> 01:55:01.340]  At a minimum
[01:55:01.340 --> 01:55:03.340]  And that doesn't even include
[01:55:03.340 --> 01:55:05.340]  The legal procedures
[01:55:05.340 --> 01:55:07.340]  You have to know if you're actually fighting a case
[01:55:07.340 --> 01:55:09.340]  At the same time
[01:55:09.340 --> 01:55:11.340]  Yeah, yeah, of course
[01:55:11.340 --> 01:55:13.340]  Okay
[01:55:13.340 --> 01:55:15.340]  So the research is extensive
[01:55:15.340 --> 01:55:17.340]  You're not going to find everything in one code
[01:55:17.340 --> 01:55:19.340]  But those are the ones
[01:55:19.340 --> 01:55:21.340]  You need to look at first
[01:55:21.340 --> 01:55:23.340]  The actual code
[01:55:23.340 --> 01:55:25.340]  The state administrative code
[01:55:25.340 --> 01:55:27.340]  And the state government code
[01:55:27.340 --> 01:55:29.340]  Okay
[01:55:29.340 --> 01:55:31.340]  Especially if your
[01:55:31.340 --> 01:55:33.340]  Actual code
[01:55:33.340 --> 01:55:35.340]  Says that there is a definition
[01:55:35.340 --> 01:55:37.340]  For department
[01:55:37.340 --> 01:55:39.340]  And what it defines there
[01:55:39.340 --> 01:55:41.340]  Is a state agency
[01:55:41.340 --> 01:55:43.340]  Then you definitely want to check
[01:55:43.340 --> 01:55:45.340]  Your government code and your administrative code
[01:55:47.340 --> 01:55:49.340]  Okay
[01:55:51.340 --> 01:55:53.340]  Right on, so definitely
[01:55:53.340 --> 01:55:55.340]  Get that in the library
[01:55:55.340 --> 01:55:57.340]  And at least start with
[01:55:57.340 --> 01:55:59.340]  Tracing back the initial title
[01:55:59.340 --> 01:56:01.340]  And can kind of work from there
[01:56:01.340 --> 01:56:03.340]  Yeah, and what you really
[01:56:03.340 --> 01:56:05.340]  Want to get to back it up
[01:56:05.340 --> 01:56:07.340]  Is when you find each legislative
[01:56:07.340 --> 01:56:09.340]  Bill
[01:56:09.340 --> 01:56:11.340]  For that timeframe that
[01:56:11.340 --> 01:56:13.340]  Redid the statute in some way
[01:56:13.340 --> 01:56:15.340]  Or form that was major
[01:56:15.340 --> 01:56:17.340]  Like a statutory revision program does
[01:56:17.340 --> 01:56:19.340]  Renumbers it, reorganizes it
[01:56:19.340 --> 01:56:21.340]  Anything like that
[01:56:21.340 --> 01:56:23.340]  You want an actual copy
[01:56:23.340 --> 01:56:25.340]  Of the enrolled bill's
[01:56:25.340 --> 01:56:27.340]  Title, if your state has a
[01:56:27.340 --> 01:56:29.340]  Constitutional requirement
[01:56:29.340 --> 01:56:31.340]  That all bills be limited to a single
[01:56:31.340 --> 01:56:33.340]  Subject, and that subject be stated
[01:56:33.340 --> 01:56:35.340]  In the bill's title
[01:56:35.340 --> 01:56:37.340]  Then you want a copy of that title
[01:56:37.340 --> 01:56:39.340]  Of every one of those bill revisions
[01:56:41.340 --> 01:56:43.340]  Because you want to see if they
[01:56:43.340 --> 01:56:45.340]  Ever tried to make substantive
[01:56:45.340 --> 01:56:47.340]  Changes to the actual statutes
[01:56:47.340 --> 01:56:49.340]  That altered what they did
[01:56:49.340 --> 01:56:51.340]  Outside of the subject matter
[01:56:51.340 --> 01:56:53.340]  Or attempted to
[01:56:53.340 --> 01:56:55.340]  And what that subject matter
[01:56:55.340 --> 01:56:57.340]  Actually is throughout the history
[01:56:57.340 --> 01:56:59.340]  Of the legislation, that's what that
[01:56:59.340 --> 01:57:01.340]  Title will show you
[01:57:01.340 --> 01:57:03.340]  Okay
[01:57:03.340 --> 01:57:05.340]  Fair enough
[01:57:05.340 --> 01:57:07.340]  Well, I think that's for this time
[01:57:07.340 --> 01:57:09.340]  That's all I need, and I'll get working on that
[01:57:09.340 --> 01:57:11.340]  And I'll try to get back in with you
[01:57:11.340 --> 01:57:13.340]  Sometime after I get a little bit more information
[01:57:13.340 --> 01:57:15.340]  Okay, well good luck with it
[01:57:15.340 --> 01:57:17.340]  Alright, thank you very much
[01:57:17.340 --> 01:57:19.340]  Now don't let it frustrate you
[01:57:19.340 --> 01:57:21.340]  Okay, I've done a little
[01:57:21.340 --> 01:57:23.340]  I messed with something a little bit
[01:57:23.340 --> 01:57:25.340]  A few years back, and it was definitely a
[01:57:25.340 --> 01:57:27.340]  Yeah, let me tell you
[01:57:27.340 --> 01:57:29.340]  How I did it real quick so you could organize it
[01:57:29.340 --> 01:57:31.340]  And you'll know how to do it
[01:57:31.340 --> 01:57:33.340]  Make yourself a flow chart
[01:57:33.340 --> 01:57:35.340]  Start with your actual code
[01:57:35.340 --> 01:57:37.340]  Find where that code defines
[01:57:37.340 --> 01:57:39.340]  What agency has responsibility
[01:57:39.340 --> 01:57:41.340]  For that chapter of that code
[01:57:41.340 --> 01:57:43.340]  Okay
[01:57:43.340 --> 01:57:45.340]  Like the Department of Public Safety
[01:57:45.340 --> 01:57:47.340]  Here in Texas does, or the Department of
[01:57:47.340 --> 01:57:49.340]  Transportation, or the Department of Motor Vehicles
[01:57:49.340 --> 01:57:51.340]  Whatever the agency is
[01:57:51.340 --> 01:57:53.340]  Is it a state agency or a local agency
[01:57:53.340 --> 01:57:55.340]  If it's a state agency
[01:57:55.340 --> 01:57:57.340]  Immediately look for that agency in your
[01:57:57.340 --> 01:57:59.340]  State administrative code
[01:57:59.340 --> 01:58:01.340]  Add that to your flow chart
[01:58:01.340 --> 01:58:03.340]  Go from this code to this agency
[01:58:03.340 --> 01:58:05.340]  To the administrative code
[01:58:05.340 --> 01:58:07.340]  In the administrative code, this agency
[01:58:07.340 --> 01:58:09.340]  Is titled, or under this chapter
[01:58:09.340 --> 01:58:11.340]  Or under this title, and blah blah blah
[01:58:11.340 --> 01:58:13.340]  And that way you can look at where your
[01:58:13.340 --> 01:58:15.340]  Legal references are
[01:58:15.340 --> 01:58:17.340]  To piece this stuff back together from
[01:58:17.340 --> 01:58:19.340]  So you don't get lost
[01:58:19.340 --> 01:58:21.340]  Okay
[01:58:21.340 --> 01:58:23.340]  Okay?
[01:58:23.340 --> 01:58:25.340]  Alright, well good luck with it man
[01:58:25.340 --> 01:58:27.340]  Stick with it
[01:58:27.340 --> 01:58:29.340]  Yes sir, John I am sorry
[01:58:29.340 --> 01:58:31.340]  Man, I am out of time
[01:58:31.340 --> 01:58:33.340]  I'm not going to be able to get to you
[01:58:33.340 --> 01:58:35.340]  As you can hear the music playing
[01:58:35.340 --> 01:58:37.340]  Folks, I want to thank you all for calling in
[01:58:37.340 --> 01:58:39.340]  I hope you have a great week
[01:58:39.340 --> 01:58:41.340]  Please, please support us financially
[01:58:41.340 --> 01:58:43.340]  On the network, make donations where you can
[01:58:43.340 --> 01:58:45.340]  Because we live off of your grace
[01:58:45.340 --> 01:58:47.340]  So please help us out
[01:58:47.340 --> 01:58:49.340]  Especially me
[01:58:49.340 --> 01:59:15.340]  Thank you
[01:59:15.340 --> 01:59:41.340]  Thank you
[01:59:41.340 --> 01:59:45.340]  That's 888-551-0102
[01:59:45.340 --> 01:59:49.340]  Or visit us online at bfa.org
[01:59:51.340 --> 01:59:53.340]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:53.340 --> 02:00:13.340]  You can find it at LogosRadioNetwork.com