[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[00:30.000 --> 00:59.000]  Today in history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedance Day Parade, killing 10 and entering 40.
[00:59.000 --> 01:04.000]  Today in history.
[01:04.000 --> 01:24.000]  And recent news. Since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing Hepin attacks his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin and San Antonio have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file new ones since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC.
[01:24.000 --> 01:33.000]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:33.000 --> 01:52.000]  Mr Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HP 1325 works, as well as other cities too like the district attorney in El Paso.
[01:52.000 --> 02:13.000]  Kyma Esparza, a Democrat, who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[02:13.000 --> 02:22.000]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[02:22.000 --> 02:39.000]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[02:39.000 --> 02:51.000]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey may be drawn into the glow.
[02:51.000 --> 03:17.000]  This is Brook Rody with a lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[03:17.000 --> 03:33.000]  Okay, Randy Kelton rule of law radio where where are we at on the hour I'm looking for my clock here.
[03:33.000 --> 03:38.000]  There it is got 13 minutes 13 and a half minutes on this segment.
[03:38.000 --> 03:49.000]  So I came in a little later than I should have. We were working on some stuff on the break. So I was talking to Brett.
[03:49.000 --> 04:00.000]  Renee, you made a good point there. You you questioned about me challenging patriot mythology that you're supposed to be patriots.
[04:00.000 --> 04:05.000]  And now I'm putting down patriotism.
[04:05.000 --> 04:10.000]  And that was my fault. I didn't address that the way I needed to.
[04:10.000 --> 04:19.000]  I assumed that you understood my position. That's a really bad strategy on my part.
[04:19.000 --> 04:21.000]  Yes, we should be patriots.
[04:21.000 --> 04:26.000]  But we have a problem with a lot of people who don't do their homework.
[04:26.000 --> 04:29.000]  Tim Turner for one.
[04:29.000 --> 04:34.000]  Tim Turner came on my show once and claimed he was a lawyer and he was no such thing.
[04:34.000 --> 04:43.000]  And he's suggesting that people do all of these things that when I listen to what he was suggesting that that's going to get improved in jail.
[04:43.000 --> 05:01.000]  He's read some things by there were a few people that put out some legal theories that were absolutely unfounded and a lot of people found followed those legal theories and wound up in jail.
[05:01.000 --> 05:07.000]  Winston Shrout was the one that first came up with a lot of this patriot mythology.
[05:07.000 --> 05:13.000]  I did a spot on Winston Shrout show. Pastor Massad set me up for that.
[05:13.000 --> 05:20.000]  And he's talking about what all he does. And I told him that Winston, I am a creature of statute.
[05:20.000 --> 05:25.000]  So you're telling us all this stuff. Where do you come up with that?
[05:25.000 --> 05:32.000]  Where is the underlying law that supports that? And he said, well, I don't know if there is any.
[05:32.000 --> 05:35.000]  He said, well, then where did you come up with this?
[05:35.000 --> 05:40.000]  And he's talking about the bankruptcy in 1931.
[05:40.000 --> 05:46.000]  And he talked about how the federal government bankrupted.
[05:46.000 --> 05:52.000]  And then he's extrapolating on how that affected our legal position.
[05:52.000 --> 06:01.000]  But that party made up. He said, well, when I asked him where he got it from, he said he figured it out.
[06:01.000 --> 06:06.000]  So I said, so you're saying you made it up long pause.
[06:06.000 --> 06:11.000]  And finally he said, well, he has a matter of fact, I did.
[06:11.000 --> 06:16.000]  I said, Winston, I can't go into court. I made it up.
[06:16.000 --> 06:19.000]  I have to go into court with facts and law.
[06:19.000 --> 06:23.000]  I don't have facts and law. I don't have a position.
[06:23.000 --> 06:30.000]  And a lot of what we call patriot mythology grew out of Winston Trout's work.
[06:30.000 --> 06:35.000]  Winston Trout is now in prison for the rest of his life.
[06:35.000 --> 06:37.000]  The federal government finally came after that.
[06:37.000 --> 06:43.000]  Did they walk him up just for some words that he used or was it from something he actually did?
[06:43.000 --> 06:54.000]  Well, it was it was what he did, but he he started a way of using the language that was unusual.
[06:54.000 --> 07:04.000]  Like here where you call I'm looking at your statement of facts where you call the officer a stranger instead of the officer.
[07:04.000 --> 07:06.000]  That's misleading.
[07:06.000 --> 07:21.000]  And when a lawyer would never put a statement in a document that way, unless the person was totally strange.
[07:21.000 --> 07:24.000]  They had no idea who this person to be.
[07:24.000 --> 07:32.000]  If he had any idea who this person be, then he would put in who we thought the person was.
[07:32.000 --> 07:42.000]  I'll have to develop. I've never had someone ask me to explain this language before.
[07:42.000 --> 07:46.000]  So I haven't created a presentation for it.
[07:46.000 --> 07:50.000]  I will have that by the next show.
[07:50.000 --> 07:56.000]  I have examples of what I mean by this kind of language.
[07:56.000 --> 08:00.000]  And once you hear it, it'll be real clear to you.
[08:00.000 --> 08:12.000]  When you read these different read different people on the Internet who's talking about your rights and how to protect your rights.
[08:12.000 --> 08:18.000]  And I really hate stinging any of them or speaking down about them.
[08:18.000 --> 08:26.000]  And the only time I do is when some people are proposing things that will get guys in jail.
[08:26.000 --> 08:31.000]  Like the 1099 OIDs.
[08:31.000 --> 08:33.000]  That was a big deal for a while.
[08:33.000 --> 08:44.000]  And they brought it to me that you could file a 1099 OID and under Winston Shrout's treatment of the 1931 bankruptcy.
[08:44.000 --> 08:49.000]  Since the government took up all the gold, we could no longer pay off our debts.
[08:49.000 --> 08:53.000]  We could only discharge them.
[08:53.000 --> 08:58.000]  And you could discharge them through the government. You wouldn't have to pay any money.
[08:58.000 --> 09:03.000]  And people started sending in notices of discharge at the debt.
[09:03.000 --> 09:05.000]  And then you wouldn't pay their debts.
[09:05.000 --> 09:09.000]  And this is especially a problem with the IRS.
[09:09.000 --> 09:12.000]  And then they started using this 1099 OID.
[09:12.000 --> 09:18.000]  Well, the 1099 OID was something used internally within the IRS.
[09:18.000 --> 09:24.000]  And somebody found it in there and they used it for a purpose that it wasn't intended for.
[09:24.000 --> 09:30.000]  And it took the IRS a while to figure out what was going on here, what was wrong.
[09:30.000 --> 09:33.000]  And then most of those people went to jail.
[09:33.000 --> 09:42.000]  A number of good close friends just got raked over the coals.
[09:42.000 --> 09:48.000]  Over following something that seemed like a great idea, but they hadn't done all their homework.
[09:48.000 --> 09:54.000]  The guys who put it out read things and misinterpreted what they read.
[09:54.000 --> 09:59.000]  And then got other people to do what they suggested.
[09:59.000 --> 10:04.000]  And for the most part, these guys didn't do what they're telling other people to do.
[10:04.000 --> 10:06.000]  And the other people wound up in jail.
[10:06.000 --> 10:14.000]  And I've been called over the country to get people out of jail for doing this, like filing a bill of what was it?
[10:14.000 --> 10:19.000]  Not a bill of elating.
[10:19.000 --> 10:22.000]  They just write out this receipt.
[10:22.000 --> 10:29.000]  The guy goes in and writes them a receipt for a new Mercedes.
[10:29.000 --> 10:33.000]  And it had no foundation under whatsoever.
[10:33.000 --> 10:38.000]  He threw them in a federal prison and a federal lockup in Brooklyn.
[10:38.000 --> 10:43.000]  I went down there and managed to get him out because of the way they used their time clocks.
[10:43.000 --> 10:47.000]  But they're following prescriptions for people who don't know what they're talking about.
[10:47.000 --> 10:50.000]  And it's real hard on all of us.
[10:50.000 --> 10:54.000]  A struggle for this credibility.
[10:54.000 --> 11:02.000]  And I only speak to law and I only speak to law that I have actually read.
[11:02.000 --> 11:08.000]  And so anyway, I don't know how to address this with you right now and I apologize for that.
[11:08.000 --> 11:10.000]  Oh, I'm sorry.
[11:10.000 --> 11:14.000]  I didn't mean to make you feel that way.
[11:14.000 --> 11:27.000]  I was only expressing concern that the question has our judicial systems degenerated to the point now that we have to worry about going to prison for words that we use.
[11:27.000 --> 11:28.000]  Yes, we do.
[11:28.000 --> 11:30.000]  We do.
[11:30.000 --> 11:32.000]  I needed this to be brought out.
[11:32.000 --> 11:42.000]  I needed this to be stuck on this time because one of the things that I struggle with are presuppositions.
[11:42.000 --> 11:48.000]  I complain about people who explain stuff and then leave things out.
[11:48.000 --> 11:50.000]  They don't tell me everything.
[11:50.000 --> 11:51.000]  I get real frustrated with that.
[11:51.000 --> 11:53.000]  Well, I'm doing the same thing.
[11:53.000 --> 11:58.000]  I'm assuming you know what I mean by patriot mythology.
[11:58.000 --> 12:06.000]  And clearly, I mean something by it, but you don't know what it is that I mean by it.
[12:06.000 --> 12:07.000]  And that's my fault.
[12:07.000 --> 12:09.000]  I should not be using that.
[12:09.000 --> 12:16.000]  And you put me in a position to where I have to go back into the books and do my homework.
[12:16.000 --> 12:21.000]  Next week, I will have this so I can explain it in a way that makes sense.
[12:21.000 --> 12:22.000]  Okay.
[12:22.000 --> 12:23.000]  Thank you.
[12:23.000 --> 12:24.000]  I'm sorry.
[12:24.000 --> 12:27.000]  No, you stopped the chomp.
[12:27.000 --> 12:30.000]  I like it when someone stomps the chomp.
[12:30.000 --> 12:31.000]  Okay.
[12:31.000 --> 12:33.000]  I get better that way.
[12:33.000 --> 12:35.000]  And that's, okay.
[12:35.000 --> 12:41.000]  Let me go through those documents and then next week, let's talk.
[12:41.000 --> 12:42.000]  Okay.
[12:42.000 --> 12:45.000]  But we'll talk during the week.
[12:45.000 --> 12:48.000]  I'm going to work on this Hernandez guy.
[12:48.000 --> 12:51.000]  So, okay, let me, okay, we'll get you next week.
[12:51.000 --> 12:55.000]  We've got, I got four more collars and I'm running out of time.
[12:55.000 --> 13:02.000]  I'm hoping that John and Tina have some questions for David.
[13:02.000 --> 13:03.000]  Thank you, Renee.
[13:03.000 --> 13:04.000]  We'll talk to you next week.
[13:04.000 --> 13:05.000]  Thank you.
[13:05.000 --> 13:06.000]  Awesome.
[13:06.000 --> 13:08.000]  Thanks.
[13:08.000 --> 13:09.000]  Okay.
[13:09.000 --> 13:11.000]  Now we're going to Tina in California.
[13:11.000 --> 13:13.000]  Hello, Tina.
[13:13.000 --> 13:14.000]  Hey, Randy.
[13:14.000 --> 13:15.000]  I'm just finishing dinner.
[13:15.000 --> 13:18.000]  Would you put me on the next one?
[13:18.000 --> 13:19.000]  Okay.
[13:19.000 --> 13:20.000]  Yeah.
[13:20.000 --> 13:21.000]  It sounded like you were in a well.
[13:21.000 --> 13:23.000]  You must be away from, okay.
[13:23.000 --> 13:27.000]  I'll go to John in New York.
[13:27.000 --> 13:28.000]  Hello, John.
[13:28.000 --> 13:31.000]  What do you have for us today?
[13:31.000 --> 13:32.000]  Hello, John.
[13:32.000 --> 13:33.000]  How are you?
[13:33.000 --> 13:34.000]  Hi.
[13:34.000 --> 13:35.000]  Hi, Randy.
[13:35.000 --> 13:36.000]  All right.
[13:36.000 --> 13:38.000]  Now you wanted me to, you wanted us to keep it on point.
[13:38.000 --> 13:40.000]  What is the topic you wanted?
[13:40.000 --> 13:43.000]  Cause I got plenty of topics, maybe.
[13:43.000 --> 13:45.000]  What would you want me to talk about?
[13:45.000 --> 13:46.000]  Traffic tickets?
[13:46.000 --> 13:48.000]  Is that what you asked for?
[13:48.000 --> 13:53.000]  The last thing we want to hear about is a seatbelt ticket.
[13:53.000 --> 13:57.000]  Well, I was wrong about the judge.
[13:57.000 --> 14:03.000]  I was wrong about the judge's submission on judicial conduct that the complaint was dismissed.
[14:03.000 --> 14:06.000]  So all I want to know from you is what do you think is going on?
[14:06.000 --> 14:11.000]  One time payoff, regular kickback.
[14:11.000 --> 14:14.000]  I know you told me to take it to the grand jury, which we're going to do.
[14:14.000 --> 14:21.000]  And then when the grand jury dumps it, and I fully expect them to dump it, tell me if I get this right.
[14:21.000 --> 14:23.000]  The next step is the U.S. attorney.
[14:23.000 --> 14:25.000]  Is that right?
[14:25.000 --> 14:27.000]  Depends on what you want to do.
[14:27.000 --> 14:31.000]  This is, this is traffic and it's relatively minor.
[14:31.000 --> 14:32.000]  Okay.
[14:32.000 --> 14:37.000]  You have done your work by taking it to the grand jury.
[14:37.000 --> 14:46.000]  You know, everybody, all the public officials believe that they will be protected.
[14:46.000 --> 14:49.000]  They believe that they have immunity and all that.
[14:49.000 --> 14:55.000]  But when you start, start charging them criminally, then this puts them out of their element.
[14:55.000 --> 15:03.000]  And the likelihood that a grand jury will indict their public official.
[15:03.000 --> 15:09.000]  Oops, for filing, for, we're getting some background noise.
[15:09.000 --> 15:20.000]  That will indict a public official for doing what he believes to be correct or in accordance with policy.
[15:20.000 --> 15:24.000]  The likelihood is somewhere between little and done.
[15:24.000 --> 15:32.000]  And that's okay because our real purpose is not to ruin someone's professional career.
[15:32.000 --> 15:38.000]  Our real purpose is to get them to follow law.
[15:38.000 --> 15:40.000]  So you've got them to the grand jury.
[15:40.000 --> 15:43.000]  You're making your complaints to the grand jury.
[15:43.000 --> 15:56.000]  These guys are pretty sure they'll be protected, but who wants to play Russian roulette with their career, with their liberty?
[15:56.000 --> 15:58.000]  You don't need to go any further.
[15:58.000 --> 16:03.000]  It's what I'm saying. You've done your hard work. You've done the heavy lifting.
[16:03.000 --> 16:06.000]  Well, what do you use, a verified complaint? You go to a notary.
[16:06.000 --> 16:12.000]  You write out what you're going to say and then you haven't notarized it.
[16:12.000 --> 16:16.000]  Yes, see, you are fading in and out, John.
[16:16.000 --> 16:24.000]  Yes, you would, a verified complaint, verification is what a notary does.
[16:24.000 --> 16:35.000]  He verifies that you are the person that you claim to be and you are the person that signed this document.
[16:35.000 --> 16:45.000]  He doesn't verify that anything is true on the document, just that the person's name who's on it is in fact the person who signed it.
[16:45.000 --> 16:52.000]  And in order for a complaint to be sufficient, it has to have that verification.
[16:52.000 --> 16:58.000]  Okay, so what is the next step after the grand jury?
[16:58.000 --> 17:00.000]  Because I fully expect them to dump it.
[17:00.000 --> 17:11.000]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway, sponsored by Central Texas Gunworks.
[17:11.000 --> 17:14.000]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:14.000 --> 17:18.000]  Any amount is appreciated. Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[17:18.000 --> 17:24.000]  From Central Texas Gunworks, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[17:24.000 --> 17:30.000]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:30.000 --> 17:35.000]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[17:35.000 --> 17:39.000]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[17:39.000 --> 17:48.000]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on Talk Radio today.
[17:48.000 --> 17:51.000]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:51.000 --> 17:55.000]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:55.000 --> 18:01.000]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:01.000 --> 18:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[18:05.000 --> 18:12.000]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[18:12.000 --> 18:19.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[18:19.000 --> 18:25.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[18:25.000 --> 18:34.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[18:34.000 --> 18:40.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleofLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today.
[18:40.000 --> 18:47.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, the Texas Transportation Code, the Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[18:50.000 --> 18:54.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com.
[18:54.000 --> 19:11.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[19:11.000 --> 19:24.000]  Well, don't let nothing get to you, only the father can deliver you. Well, don't let bad-mine people hurt you until something gets behind you.
[19:24.000 --> 19:42.000]  Norman, my friend, and all our judges in the court.
[19:42.000 --> 20:10.000]  Here we come, you know you are speaking.
[20:10.000 --> 20:25.000]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, RuleofLawRadio here with our special guest, David Tulis, and we're talking to John in New York.
[20:25.000 --> 20:31.000]  And where to go next? It kind of depends on how big a fight you want to have.
[20:31.000 --> 20:38.000]  You're actually at the point where everything you do makes their life miserable.
[20:38.000 --> 20:41.000]  You're at the point where you're actually picking the fight.
[20:41.000 --> 20:44.000]  And over the break I was thinking about that.
[20:44.000 --> 20:58.000]  Yes, at this point we could go directly to the feds and say that the state of New York is acting in a
[20:58.000 --> 21:13.000]  re-co-type of conspiratorial circumstance where they are denying the citizen in the right to petition the court for redressing grievance.
[21:13.000 --> 21:32.000]  In that you petition the grand jury and you have reason to believe that the prosecuting attorney improperly influenced the grand jury to prevent them from indicting a public official.
[21:32.000 --> 21:35.000]  You don't care if they did that or not.
[21:35.000 --> 21:40.000]  You just make the accusation and they have to answer it.
[21:40.000 --> 21:43.000]  Let's see if I understand it.
[21:43.000 --> 21:44.000]  You go to the feds.
[21:44.000 --> 21:52.000]  Now, on the feds, what office do you go to and you say that the re-co-laws have been broken? Is that the idea?
[21:52.000 --> 21:56.000]  Yes, special agent in charge of the FBI.
[21:56.000 --> 21:57.000]  Oh, that's right.
[21:57.000 --> 22:03.000]  The FBI is essentially a secret police right now because they won't tell you their names.
[22:03.000 --> 22:08.000]  The only name you can get is the special agent in charge.
[22:08.000 --> 22:10.000]  Right. And what do you charge the judge with?
[22:10.000 --> 22:17.000]  Reco laws, the state of New York is engaged in the re-co and breaking the re-co.
[22:17.000 --> 22:19.000]  Well, re-co is hard.
[22:19.000 --> 22:26.000]  Official misconduct, 18 U.S. Code 242 is a lot easier.
[22:26.000 --> 22:31.000]  You accuse the judge of denying you in due process.
[22:31.000 --> 22:42.000]  Due process rings in the state or the fed because both the state and the federal constitutions guarantee you due process.
[22:42.000 --> 22:47.000]  And due process goes to letter of law.
[22:47.000 --> 22:49.000]  Now, the courts don't like that.
[22:49.000 --> 22:56.000]  The police and the prosecutors, they don't like that.
[22:56.000 --> 22:58.000]  They want to be able to do what they want to.
[22:58.000 --> 22:59.000]  That's right.
[22:59.000 --> 23:04.000]  But at the end of the day, the Constitution commands it.
[23:04.000 --> 23:13.000]  So, accuse the judge of denying you in due process and file a complaint with the special agent in charge of the FBI.
[23:13.000 --> 23:20.000]  And it would be one thing, Randy, if we did it this once, but I think I counted it these five times when we did it.
[23:20.000 --> 23:31.000]  And he allowed the cop to perjure himself twice and it was obvious to the judge that it would be obvious to anybody that if we figured it out, that he perjured himself.
[23:31.000 --> 23:35.000]  Oh, oh, wonderful.
[23:35.000 --> 23:40.000]  Suborning perjury.
[23:40.000 --> 23:42.000]  Suborning perjury.
[23:42.000 --> 23:44.000]  Suborning perjury.
[23:44.000 --> 23:49.000]  18 U.S. Code 4.
[23:49.000 --> 23:51.000]  Right up there at the front.
[23:51.000 --> 23:53.000]  And three has been repealed.
[23:53.000 --> 23:58.000]  So, it's the third federal criminal statute is suborning perjury.
[23:58.000 --> 23:59.000]  Okay.
[23:59.000 --> 24:01.000]  Say that again.
[24:01.000 --> 24:03.000]  Say it again because it's the same group there.
[24:03.000 --> 24:07.000]  Suborning perjury.
[24:07.000 --> 24:13.000]  The third criminal statute in 18 U.S. Code.
[24:13.000 --> 24:15.000]  18 U.S. Code 4.
[24:15.000 --> 24:17.000]  Three has been repealed.
[24:17.000 --> 24:30.000]  And the third one, right up there at the front, charges the judge if the judge knowingly accepts and renders the ruling based on perjured testimony, he's suborning perjury.
[24:30.000 --> 24:37.000]  Great complaint to file with the special agent charge of the FBI.
[24:37.000 --> 24:47.000]  The last thing the agent's going to want to do is go down and pick a fight with a local judge.
[24:47.000 --> 24:50.000]  At least we hope that's what he wants, what he doesn't want to do.
[24:50.000 --> 24:52.000]  We don't want him to do what we ask him to do.
[24:52.000 --> 24:54.000]  We want him not to.
[24:54.000 --> 25:03.000]  So we can then file against the special agent charge of the FBI with the U.S. Attorney.
[25:03.000 --> 25:10.000]  Or actually you file it with the U.S. Grand Jury through the U.S. Attorney's office.
[25:10.000 --> 25:16.000]  And the U.S. Attorney will get that and secret it from the Grand Jury.
[25:16.000 --> 25:21.000]  And then you file against the U.S. Attorney with the Grand Jury.
[25:21.000 --> 25:26.000]  And you file it at the U.S. Attorney's office.
[25:26.000 --> 25:31.000]  U.S. Attorney will get the complaint even if you send it to the form of the Grand Jury.
[25:31.000 --> 25:40.000]  But because in reality what happens is the mailman brings all the mail to the mailroom.
[25:40.000 --> 25:42.000]  The guy in the mailroom signs for all of it.
[25:42.000 --> 25:52.000]  So when you send the complaint against the U.S. Attorney, accusing him of secreting your complaint
[25:52.000 --> 25:57.000]  against the special agent in charge from the Grand Jury,
[25:57.000 --> 26:05.000]  you send that registered restricted and insure it for 500 bucks.
[26:05.000 --> 26:12.000]  And you include a cover letter in there where you ask the formant to initial this document
[26:12.000 --> 26:13.000]  and send it back to you.
[26:13.000 --> 26:19.000]  Do not sign it as the U.S. Attorney has a rubber stamp with your name on it.
[26:19.000 --> 26:24.000]  And you want to make sure that the U.S. Attorney did not rubber stamp this document.
[26:24.000 --> 26:29.000]  Well, the U.S. Attorney is going to get that document and he's going to open it.
[26:29.000 --> 26:34.000]  U.S. Attorney is going to get it because the guy in the mailroom signed for it.
[26:34.000 --> 26:41.000]  Even though he wasn't allowed to because you send it restricted, only the person named can sign for it.
[26:41.000 --> 26:45.000]  And you send it to the formant of the Grand Jury since they won't give you his name,
[26:45.000 --> 26:47.000]  you can use his title instead.
[26:47.000 --> 26:58.000]  When the mailroom guy signs for it, then that's the mail fraud charge or interfering with the U.S. mail.
[26:58.000 --> 27:04.000]  And when the prosecutor gets it, he'll get it legitimately because he'll get it from his mailroom.
[27:04.000 --> 27:10.000]  And he won't necessarily know that it was sent to the formant of the Grand Jury.
[27:10.000 --> 27:17.000]  He'll open it and it'll be a complaint against him from secreting documents from the Grand Jury.
[27:17.000 --> 27:20.000]  And then he's going to know you set him up.
[27:20.000 --> 27:29.000]  And you got that letter on top giving notice to the formant that the U.S. Attorney has a rubber stamp with his name on it.
[27:29.000 --> 27:34.000]  And he is not going to want that formant to know that he has a rubber stamp.
[27:34.000 --> 27:43.000]  He uses that rubber stamp to rubber stamp superseding indictments, superseding indictments.
[27:43.000 --> 27:49.000]  You take a guy before the Grand Jury and get an indictment over some minor issue.
[27:49.000 --> 27:56.000]  Once you get an initial indictment, now you really start doing your true investigation.
[27:56.000 --> 28:04.000]  And you find more, the real things you wanted to charge him with in the first place but didn't have the evidence.
[28:04.000 --> 28:16.000]  When you get the evidence for the more serious charges, the U.S. Attorney just rubber stamps and he does not bring them back before the Grand Jury.
[28:16.000 --> 28:19.000]  And I can show you a way to find that.
[28:19.000 --> 28:33.000]  You ask the, look at the date of the indictment and then put in an information request for the voucher by the Grand Jury court reporter for this day.
[28:33.000 --> 28:40.000]  We caught him in San Diego using a forged superseding indictment.
[28:40.000 --> 28:45.000]  There was some famous football player and they had to drop the charges against him.
[28:45.000 --> 28:55.000]  But anyway, they have this stamp that you want the, you put it in your letter and the U.S. Attorney is not going to want the formant to see it.
[28:55.000 --> 28:58.000]  So he's not going to get that letter.
[28:58.000 --> 29:10.000]  Then you get to go after the U.S. Attorney for tavern with the Grand Jury.
[29:10.000 --> 29:16.000]  Regardless of your initial complaints, they don't make any difference. This crime stands on its own.
[29:16.000 --> 29:25.000]  And then you get the feds all upset at these guys down on the bottom and they start saying, okay, how can we get this guy off our case?
[29:25.000 --> 29:28.000]  Well, how about if we go crucify that judge?
[29:28.000 --> 29:31.000]  Maybe that'll get him to leave us alone.
[29:31.000 --> 29:33.000]  How does that sound, John?
[29:33.000 --> 29:36.000]  That sounds very good. Yeah, sounds good.
[29:36.000 --> 29:42.000]  The other judge, too, is a fight. Wait, wait, hold on. Hold on. Out of time.
[29:42.000 --> 29:50.000]  It's Randy Calton, Brett Fountain with our radio. Hang on. We'll pick you up on the other side, John.
[29:50.000 --> 29:55.000]  I call it. I'm not going to give out the call in number because the car boards are full.
[29:55.000 --> 30:03.000]  If you want to call in, wait till someone drops off and then call in. We'll be right back.
[30:03.000 --> 30:12.000]  Keep your voice down. The government now has Russian technology that matches identities to voices so we can tell who's doing the talking.
[30:12.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Back to tell you how it works after this.
[30:16.000 --> 30:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:35.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:42.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:54.000]  Since 2001, when the Patriot Act opened the doors to electronic surveillance, Big Brother has gone crazy vacuuming up all of our data.
[30:54.000 --> 30:59.000]  Now it has a new tactic, courtesy of our former communist allies, the Russians.
[30:59.000 --> 31:06.000]  It's called Voice Grid Nation, and it analyzes and identifies voices courtesy of Russia's Speech Technology Center.
[31:06.000 --> 31:12.000]  When authorities intercept a call, the speaker's voice is compared to millions of others, like a fingerprint.
[31:12.000 --> 31:15.000]  How long does it take for a match? Three seconds.
[31:15.000 --> 31:22.000]  So watch what you say on the phone, comrades. Whether you say your name or not, Big Brother may know who's talking.
[31:22.000 --> 31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:36.000]  I lost my son, my uncle, my uncle on September 11, 2001.
[31:36.000 --> 31:40.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[31:40.000 --> 31:44.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:44.000 --> 31:53.000]  The official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7. Over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence and believe there is more to the story.
[31:53.000 --> 31:56.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[31:56.000 --> 31:58.000]  Go to BuildingWhat.org.
[31:58.000 --> 32:01.000]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[32:01.000 --> 32:06.000]  Logos Radio Network welcomes a new show to our lineup for the new year.
[32:06.000 --> 32:15.000]  Scripture Talk with Nana will begin Wednesday, January 8 from 8 to 10 p.m. Central Time. Our goal is in accord with Matthew 5, 16.
[32:15.000 --> 32:22.000]  Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
[32:22.000 --> 32:27.000]  We wish to reflect God's light and be a blessing to all those with a hearing ear.
[32:27.000 --> 32:35.000]  Join Nana and guests for both verse-by-verse Bible studies and topical Bible studies designed to provoke unto love and good works.
[32:35.000 --> 32:42.000]  Our verse-by-verse Bible studies will begin in the book of Matthew where we will discuss one chapter per week.
[32:42.000 --> 32:49.000]  Our topical Bible studies will vary each week and will explore sound doctrine as well as Christian character developments.
[32:49.000 --> 33:07.000]  So mark your calendar and join us live on LogosRadioNetwork.com Wednesdays from 8 to 10 p.m. starting January 8 for an inspiring and motivating discussion of the Scriptures.
[33:20.000 --> 33:25.000]  Okay, we are back.
[33:25.000 --> 33:36.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rural Law Radio here with David Tulis, and we're talking to John in New York.
[33:36.000 --> 33:42.000]  Okay John, this is kind of off the topic I wanted to try to stay on.
[33:42.000 --> 33:49.000]  I don't want to spend a lot of time addressing how to use the feds.
[33:49.000 --> 33:59.000]  I'd rather do this on a show devoted more to the routine, how to run the routine on these public officials.
[33:59.000 --> 34:03.000]  Okay, I'll keep it real short. I'll keep it real short now.
[34:03.000 --> 34:15.000]  There was another judge involved. The first judge was in Village Court. The second judge, it was appealed to that county court judge, and he did not reverse it.
[34:15.000 --> 34:24.000]  And it was written in writing and there was proof in writing in front of his eyes that he also saw that we proved the cop lied twice.
[34:24.000 --> 34:29.000]  And so I guess we can name him as well.
[34:29.000 --> 34:36.000]  Or failing to properly apply the law to the facts.
[34:36.000 --> 34:38.000]  Okay.
[34:38.000 --> 34:50.000]  And allege an act of abuse of discretion that had the effect of denying you in due process.
[34:50.000 --> 34:53.000]  Does that go to the feds too or somewhere else?
[34:53.000 --> 35:00.000]  And I go to the feds too. Any due process claim can go to the feds.
[35:00.000 --> 35:14.000]  And it's appropriate to judge to the feds because the judges are the ones in the state who are there to address your legal issues and they're the ones that are creating the legal issue.
[35:14.000 --> 35:21.000]  So it's appropriate to take them straight to the state.
[35:21.000 --> 35:30.000]  We file against the judge with a special agent charge. Special agent charge has no intention of pursuing complaints against this judge.
[35:30.000 --> 35:35.000]  But he's got a CYA cover his behind.
[35:35.000 --> 35:43.000]  So in order to cover his behind, he's going to send an agent out to talk to the judge and get the judges side of this situation.
[35:43.000 --> 35:57.000]  And what do you think that judge is going to think when he gets to the FBI agent coming out and talking to him about an accusation of abuse of discretion and due process violations?
[35:57.000 --> 36:05.000]  If I was a judge, couldn't I reverse my rulings?
[36:05.000 --> 36:11.000]  No. He's already made the ruling. He can't fix it.
[36:11.000 --> 36:18.000]  He's made the ruling and his plenary jurisdiction has ran.
[36:18.000 --> 36:27.000]  The time for appeal has ran or it has been appealed. He's lost jurisdiction. He can't do anything at this point.
[36:27.000 --> 36:32.000]  Okay. So once again, the last thing I'm going to say, and I thank you.
[36:32.000 --> 36:41.000]  If the judge in Village Court had violated the defendant's right, just once or maybe twice.
[36:41.000 --> 36:50.000]  But as far as I can remember, he violated it like five times. There were five or more inappropriate things that he did.
[36:50.000 --> 36:57.000]  I mean, it was the dukes of hazard script all the way. You thought you were okay.
[36:57.000 --> 37:07.000]  Each time is a separate offense.
[37:07.000 --> 37:15.000]  Oh, well, yeah, but there were several. There was close to a half a dozen. If five or six, something like that.
[37:15.000 --> 37:29.000]  Okay. Charge him separately for each one and make your legal argument about each one on how it was improper, what the judge did was improper and did not do process.
[37:29.000 --> 37:31.000]  Right. Okay.
[37:31.000 --> 37:34.000]  All right.
[37:34.000 --> 37:39.000]  It's kind of like me standing in a room and shooting three people.
[37:39.000 --> 37:43.000]  I don't get charged once for shooting three people.
[37:43.000 --> 37:45.000]  Three times.
[37:45.000 --> 37:47.000]  Right. I got you.
[37:47.000 --> 37:48.000]  Yep.
[37:48.000 --> 37:52.000]  Okay. Thank you, John. Thank you. Thank you very much.
[37:52.000 --> 38:00.000]  You are welcome. Now we're going to go to Taylor in California.
[38:00.000 --> 38:07.000]  No, that's Tina. Let's go back. Oh, Tina in California. She wants to call her next. Okay. Tina.
[38:07.000 --> 38:09.000]  Hello. How are you?
[38:09.000 --> 38:15.000]  I am good. What do you have for us today?
[38:15.000 --> 38:29.000]  Well, it's a little bit towards what your guest is speaking about, not traffic, but, you know, we're trying to hold our officials and our system accountable. Correct.
[38:29.000 --> 38:39.000]  Let me read you a statement here. The state bar of California's mission is to protect the public.
[38:39.000 --> 38:48.000]  Okay. They enforce the rules of professional conduct for attorneys and discipline attorneys who violate rules and laws. That's just a little bit.
[38:48.000 --> 39:13.000]  Remember, I have filed upon your suggestion a freedom of an open records request to get the copy of the attorney's response to my complaint, and it was refused me because they said that's a secret.
[39:13.000 --> 39:21.000]  Well, I got to talk to the guy who signed up for the senior trial council today.
[39:21.000 --> 39:32.000]  And he said, well, in my letter, you know, we can't share that because it gives you the government codes in there that says we don't have to do that.
[39:32.000 --> 39:48.000]  So you're really not protecting the public then. Well, we are, but this, you know, you can't have results of an investigation. I said, but I'm a party to that investigation and you're saying to me that that party can.
[39:48.000 --> 39:51.000]  Okay. Let me ask a question.
[39:51.000 --> 39:57.000]  Is the restriction a statutory restriction or is it a rule?
[39:57.000 --> 40:15.000]  It says it's government code 6254 investigatory files compiled by a state agency for licensing purposes are not subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
[40:15.000 --> 40:29.000]  There is some professional code 6861 subdivision be disciplinary investigation shall not be disclosed pursuant to any state law, including but not limited to the California Public Records.
[40:29.000 --> 40:44.000]  And he said, I said, well, as a state require the attorneys to, you know, furnish a copy of their response. And he said, well, our legislature did not do that.
[40:44.000 --> 40:49.000]  So it sounds like it's statutory.
[40:49.000 --> 40:54.000]  So if they gave it to you, that would be a crime.
[40:54.000 --> 41:09.000]  But how can the state bar mission to protect the public is to protect the public. If they deny the public any access to any record, because then it's the Fox starting the hill.
[41:09.000 --> 41:16.000]  Yeah, and I understand that. But that's a philosophical argument about the effect of the law.
[41:16.000 --> 41:27.000]  And that would be a good argument to bring for to support a initiative to change the law.
[41:27.000 --> 41:38.000]  But the laws in place, it's in place. If they give it if they subsequently give that to you, then they violated law themselves.
[41:38.000 --> 41:43.000]  And that's another way to do this.
[41:43.000 --> 41:56.000]  You might sue the bar for failing to abide by their charter.
[41:56.000 --> 42:09.000]  Is there anything that grants the bar in California immunity from suit? I'm going to bet you there's not.
[42:09.000 --> 42:14.000]  You know, how can they claim to protect the public if they deny you access to.
[42:14.000 --> 42:30.000]  That's that's the suit you that's exactly the suit you bring that they fail to protect. They fail to abide by their charter in that they fail to protect the public, which the charter requires them to do.
[42:30.000 --> 42:35.000]  So if they don't want to release it by then just saw the exude the bar.
[42:35.000 --> 42:39.000]  And do you see the bar in federal court?
[42:39.000 --> 42:48.000]  The state court. The state court. This is a civil tort.
[42:48.000 --> 42:50.000]  Okay.
[42:50.000 --> 42:56.000]  State court is going to rule against you out of hand at every turn because California is by far the most corrupt state in the nation.
[42:56.000 --> 43:04.000]  But in the process of having to move against you out of hand at every turn, then you'll get federal due process violations against them.
[43:04.000 --> 43:08.000]  Then you bring them all to the feds.
[43:08.000 --> 43:14.000]  You can actually bring them criminally to the feds.
[43:14.000 --> 43:16.000]  Yeah.
[43:16.000 --> 43:25.000]  It's interesting because, you know, I filed against this attorney and I'm going to come to you this weekend to finalize that criminal complaint.
[43:25.000 --> 43:27.000]  I noticed today.
[43:27.000 --> 43:30.000]  Okay, hold on. Hold on.
[43:30.000 --> 43:34.000]  About to go to sponsors.
[43:34.000 --> 43:43.000]  Brandy, your sponsors. We got we got cool sponsors and they're really cool because I'm one of them.
[43:43.000 --> 43:48.000]  Brandy Kelton, Grant Fountain, Boulevard Radio.
[43:48.000 --> 43:54.000]  Check out our sponsors. We still have the fundraiser going on for today only.
[43:54.000 --> 44:00.000]  And then we'll have to shut it shut down the gun giveaway to grab it.
[44:00.000 --> 44:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[44:05.000 --> 44:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris Proven Method.
[44:09.000 --> 44:15.000]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[44:15.000 --> 44:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[44:21.000 --> 44:27.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[44:27.000 --> 44:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[44:29.000 --> 44:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[44:34.000 --> 44:38.000]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[44:38.000 --> 44:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[44:41.000 --> 44:49.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email Michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[44:49.000 --> 44:57.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[44:57.000 --> 45:00.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[45:00.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[45:07.000 --> 45:15.000]  The affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours you step-by-step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:22.000 --> 46:32.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:32.000 --> 46:41.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio here with David Toulouse, and we were talking to someone.
[46:41.000 --> 46:45.000]  I think it was Tina because I forgot to mute you.
[46:45.000 --> 46:47.000]  Hello, Tina. Okay.
[46:47.000 --> 47:00.000]  That's okay. Well, I noticed today that there was an attorney in California that was disbarred and sanctioned for various things,
[47:00.000 --> 47:10.000]  one of which, you know, acts of moral perpetuity, one of which was signing for his client's, you know, signing documents.
[47:10.000 --> 47:18.000]  The other one is this count one, and this is interesting for quite a few of the California people here.
[47:18.000 --> 47:23.000]  6068C, seeking to mislead a judge.
[47:23.000 --> 47:37.000]  In count one, those CTC alleged that respondents sought to mislead a judge or judicial officer by an archivist or false statement of fact or law.
[47:37.000 --> 47:44.000]  This one is by signing his client's name to 11 documents and filing them with San Bernardino County Superior Court.
[47:44.000 --> 48:04.000]  It will provide violation of section 6068, which provides that an attorney has both, you know, has something to, is not allowed to make a statement in court that is false or misleading.
[48:04.000 --> 48:19.000]  He has a duty to only soy the means to consistent with truth and never to seek to mislead the judge or any judicial officer by an archivist or false statement of law or fact.
[48:19.000 --> 48:32.000]  So when my attorney put in a false statement to the appeals court, and the appeals court accepted it and ran with it, and I complained, nothing happened to him.
[48:32.000 --> 48:51.000]  Oh, then if he made a false statement to the appeals court and you notice the appeals court that he made a false statement, and they acted on that anyway, then charge the appeals court judges with subordination of perjury.
[48:51.000 --> 48:54.000]  Subordination of perjury, okay.
[48:54.000 --> 48:55.000]  Subordination.
[48:55.000 --> 49:00.000]  Yeah, I said subordination. Yeah, suborning, suborning, I said that wrong.
[49:00.000 --> 49:02.000]  Suborning, perjury.
[49:02.000 --> 49:04.000]  Suborning, perjury.
[49:04.000 --> 49:05.000]  Yeah.
[49:05.000 --> 49:18.000]  And that looks so ugly, you know, they won't get prosecuted for it, but if you file it with the FBI, they're going to call.
[49:18.000 --> 49:23.000]  That's what happened to the federal judge in Fort Worth that I filed criminal charges against.
[49:23.000 --> 49:32.000]  When he dismissed my petition for declaratory judgment for failure to stay to claim, declaratory judgment doesn't have claims.
[49:32.000 --> 49:43.000]  So I filed criminal charges against him and we've had three of my suits filed since then that I know of and he did not dismiss one of them.
[49:43.000 --> 49:50.000]  He probably got a really unsettling call from an FBI agent.
[49:50.000 --> 50:03.000]  So if Tina, if you file federally against the judge for suborning perjury, that looks ugly.
[50:03.000 --> 50:11.000]  And it's a mark on his chart.
[50:11.000 --> 50:19.000]  I'd like to be a fly on the wall when he gets the call from the FBI agent.
[50:19.000 --> 50:25.000]  I want to be real conciliatory. Oh, well, we were just, we got this complaint so we had to check it out.
[50:25.000 --> 50:28.000]  You know, we're not going to do anything blah, blah, blah.
[50:28.000 --> 50:41.000]  But it's still going to terrify the judge because the judge knows that the feds have very little regard for the state.
[50:41.000 --> 50:51.000]  There's any political reason the feds will crucify the state judge.
[50:51.000 --> 50:53.000]  I like that.
[50:53.000 --> 51:20.000]  But it shows that the favoritism too here because they disbarred this one attorney for misleading a judge and a court, but they don't disbar others and they don't discipline them in any way for filing false statements and false documents which use a felony in California.
[51:20.000 --> 51:30.000]  And nothing happens to them if they're, you know, part of a huge law firm within Alex, which my attorneys that, you know, are going to.
[51:30.000 --> 51:44.000]  So, so Tina, you might consider bar grieving the partners of that law firm and bar grieve the other lawyers who are involved if they have some supervisors you can find from their website.
[51:44.000 --> 51:54.000]  And they have a responsibility to make sure that the subordinate lawyers don't go running off committing crimes.
[51:54.000 --> 52:10.000]  And if you call on that portion of the disciplinary rules, then you bring in, you loop in their supervisors to the subordinates misbehavior.
[52:10.000 --> 52:17.000]  And there's nothing like stinging the essentially innocent party.
[52:17.000 --> 52:19.000]  I wouldn't say innocent.
[52:19.000 --> 52:22.000]  I said essentially.
[52:22.000 --> 52:23.000]  Yeah.
[52:23.000 --> 52:25.000]  As in oily.
[52:25.000 --> 52:30.000]  Yeah, kind of like that.
[52:30.000 --> 52:43.000]  Charles slick and slimy. And I would I don't know if I would give essential oils, the bad name of it, asserting that they're used by lawyers.
[52:43.000 --> 52:49.000]  But the lawyer who didn't actually do anything.
[52:49.000 --> 52:53.000]  And he gets a bar grievance because of what the other lawyer did.
[52:53.000 --> 52:57.000]  He's not going to want to take responsibility.
[52:57.000 --> 53:01.000]  I'll create you. There's a good chance if you did that.
[53:01.000 --> 53:10.000]  Hope you realize that you could create an emotional turmoil within the farm.
[53:10.000 --> 53:16.000]  You might find you might even cause some heartburn.
[53:16.000 --> 53:19.000]  Oh, is that all alcohol?
[53:19.000 --> 53:25.000]  You might get their malpractice insurance canceled.
[53:25.000 --> 53:28.000]  Good.
[53:28.000 --> 53:31.000]  Okay. Do you have anything else for us to know?
[53:31.000 --> 53:36.000]  Would I name all five partners in the farm?
[53:36.000 --> 53:38.000]  Absolutely.
[53:38.000 --> 53:44.000]  She said, would she name all five partners? Absolutely.
[53:44.000 --> 53:45.000]  Okay.
[53:45.000 --> 53:50.000]  Is there any reason why one of them should be innocent?
[53:50.000 --> 53:54.000]  Not that I can think of.
[53:54.000 --> 53:55.000]  Yeah.
[53:55.000 --> 53:58.000]  Okay. Wonderful.
[53:58.000 --> 54:01.000]  I have a question.
[54:01.000 --> 54:06.000]  Tina, did you get your Christmas card this year from that law firm?
[54:06.000 --> 54:11.000]  No. And I was really upset about that.
[54:11.000 --> 54:16.000]  Oh, you know, you keep this up. You're not going to get one next year either.
[54:16.000 --> 54:18.000]  No.
[54:18.000 --> 54:21.000]  Life is tough.
[54:21.000 --> 54:23.000]  Okay.
[54:23.000 --> 54:28.000]  Anything else, Danny?
[54:28.000 --> 54:30.000]  I'm looking here.
[54:30.000 --> 54:39.000]  Danny, you know, I mentioned Danny earlier and he called in Danny Murphy from Tennessee.
[54:39.000 --> 54:47.000]  That's why I tripped up and said, Danny, you're a lot prettier than Danny is.
[54:47.000 --> 54:51.000]  So that's okay. I'll answer to it.
[54:51.000 --> 54:53.000]  Okay. Do you have anything else for us?
[54:53.000 --> 54:55.000]  No, that's it. Thank you very much. Appreciate it.
[54:55.000 --> 54:57.000]  Okay. Thank you, Tina.
[54:57.000 --> 55:00.000]  Okay.
[55:00.000 --> 55:08.000]  Now we're going to get, Taylor, I'll get to you in a minute, but I want to go to Danny in Tennessee because I believe he's going to be on point.
[55:08.000 --> 55:10.000]  Hello, Danny.
[55:10.000 --> 55:17.000]  Well, hey, I'm not sure about it. I heard what you said earlier.
[55:17.000 --> 55:21.000]  That sounds vaguely familiar, but I don't know about it.
[55:21.000 --> 55:25.000]  Wait, did you hear the good things I said about you or the bad?
[55:25.000 --> 55:28.000]  Well, I only remember the good things.
[55:28.000 --> 55:31.000]  Oh, okay.
[55:31.000 --> 55:50.000]  Okay. I seem to remember you were speaking to the fact that traffic tickets should be filed in administrative court in Nashville.
[55:50.000 --> 55:56.000]  Well, that doesn't sound all that familiar to me. So I think you got me mixed up with somebody.
[55:56.000 --> 56:05.000]  Oh, okay. It's possible. This is the only one I could think of on, I'm talking to you about with Tennessee law.
[56:05.000 --> 56:18.000]  So it might have been the guy in Memphis whose brother beat up the cop, Jerome.
[56:18.000 --> 56:22.000]  Okay. I'll check that.
[56:22.000 --> 56:32.000]  Well, that's disappointing, Danny. Other than that, did you have anything to bring on the show tonight?
[56:32.000 --> 56:44.000]  No, nothing too special except you had David there. He's published that paper of mine I sent to you. He's published it on his website.
[56:44.000 --> 56:53.000]  Okay. I'm going to build a set of documents for David's traffic website.
[56:53.000 --> 57:04.000]  Could you help provide some Tennessee traffic argument documents?
[57:04.000 --> 57:07.000]  Yeah, please help.
[57:07.000 --> 57:16.000]  Put some together for us and we'll put those on the side to see if we can't shut down traffic enforcement.
[57:16.000 --> 57:29.000]  Yeah. Oh, yeah. A little idea I had recently. I came across something about where here locally they had done a...
[57:29.000 --> 57:37.000]  What was that you were talking about just a little bit ago about, you know, opinion on the law without making a claim?
[57:37.000 --> 57:40.000]  Oh, declaratory judgment.
[57:40.000 --> 57:54.000]  Yeah, declaratory judgment where the county had put in a declaratory judgment against one of the agencies in the county.
[57:54.000 --> 58:05.000]  And so that's going to be here sitting here locally somewhere. So I'm planning on going picking it up to see exactly how they pledded.
[58:05.000 --> 58:10.000]  So I can just go do the same thing with some of these things we've been talking about.
[58:10.000 --> 58:19.000]  So there's not much reason for them to say it's been adequate since it was done originally by government lawyers.
[58:19.000 --> 58:25.000]  And no questions brought if they found it in the court. There they just did their judgment and everything.
[58:25.000 --> 58:32.000]  Good, good. They'll show you how to structure it and how to establish your standing in jurisdiction and such.
[58:32.000 --> 58:38.000]  Hang on. We're about to go to our sponsors, Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio.
[58:38.000 --> 58:44.000]  Call in number 512-646-1984. We do have one hour left.
[58:44.000 --> 58:50.000]  So if you have a question or comment, give us a call. We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 59:01.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:13.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  The free books are a three volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.000 --> 59:27.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:27.000 --> 59:40.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.000 --> 59:52.000]  That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:52.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:06.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by The Lowest Star Lowdown.
[01:00:06.000 --> 01:00:20.000]  Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019, open with precious metals, gold $1,429.00, silver $16.45.00, copper $2.75.00, oil, Texas crude $55.63 of barrel,
[01:00:20.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  Brent crude $62.47 of barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum $227.26, XRP, Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 of crypto coin.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  Today in history, the year 1916, the Preparedness Day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedness Day Parade,
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:00.000]  killing 10 and injuring 40.
[01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  Today in history.
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 legalizing heaven attacks his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges,
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  and even refusing to file new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory equipment to test the earth for THC.
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the law.
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:42.000]  Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas,
[01:01:42.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as well as other cities too, like the district attorney in El Paso, Paima Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso.
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:13.000]  However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal based on its chemical makeup.
[01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:22.000]  It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're charged with.
[01:02:22.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark as the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East Pacific Ocean.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid from a gland near its front fins. For the purpose, it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the glow.
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  This is Book Roadie with the lowdown for July 22, 2019.
[01:03:00.000 --> 01:03:24.000]  Music playing.
[01:03:24.000 --> 01:03:48.000]  Music playing.
[01:03:48.000 --> 01:04:01.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rude Law Radio, and we're talking to Tate. Let's see, who am I talking to? I'm talking to Danny.
[01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  Danny, okay, so kind of push whacked you there. You didn't have the information you needed. Do you have anything else you want to talk about?
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  No, not really. I just heard you asked me to call in, so I did.
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  Okay, so you heard us making jokes about you.
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:25.000]  Did Danny Murphy jokes?
[01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:27.000]  Thanks all mine.
[01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  Okay, thank you, Danny. Okay, now we're going to go to Taylor in Texas. Hello, Taylor.
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:37.000]  Hey, how's it going, Randy?
[01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  It's going good.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:48.000]  Thank you for the DPS today and tell you what, they refused to accept my paperwork for Open Records.
[01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:52.000]  Whoa, did you call 911?
[01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:55.000]  No, I thought about that, but no.
[01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:59.000]  Oh, that is a great time to do that.
[01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:08.000]  When I do Open Records, I just hope they'll say, well, why do you want to see this 911?
[01:05:08.000 --> 01:05:13.000]  No warning, no fair warning, no opportunity to fix it.
[01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:16.000]  So, okay, tell us what happened.
[01:05:16.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  All right. I went down there. I armed with my scope of content and my Open Records, just my information request off your site.
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  I got escorted to the back there where I talked with one of the ladies who administered the test. She told me to refer to the CDL handbook.
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:45.000]  I said, that's just the information I want to know the testing guideline. She said it's against policy to give that out.
[01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:49.000]  And I asked her if that was confidential or classified information.
[01:05:49.000 --> 01:06:02.000]  And she said, yes, I don't think she knows what I meant by that, but I said, so I'm going to give you this form, which is scope of content, because she couldn't tell me exactly what I was looking for.
[01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:08.000]  And she went and talked to her supervisor, supervisor came back and said, we can't accept forms.
[01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:12.000]  You'll have to leave your information and we'll get back to you.
[01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:22.000]  I'm going to give you a hint and hot for a bit. I left my email and decided I'd figure out a different plan of action.
[01:06:22.000 --> 01:06:33.000]  Hmm. So you didn't, you could also ask, when they're, when they're being ornery and obstinate and coming up with ignorant answers like that, you could also ask them, oh, that's your policy.
[01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  I would like for you to produce for me all the records and internal communications that you have about this policy. I need to know about this policy of yours and make them produce it when they can't.
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:51.000]  They're going to, they're going to stumble over their response about that.
[01:06:51.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  Well, if, if they said there was a policy and then you asked for it and they failed to produce the policy.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:11.000]  9-1-1 charges them with violating the act, even if the records didn't exist.
[01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:14.000]  Can I file a criminal complaint at this point?
[01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:16.000]  Oh, yeah.
[01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  Okay.
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  The open records, the open government act is not a civil statute.
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:31.000]  It is a criminal statute. 5-52, what is it? 5-52-353?
[01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:35.000]  We're at 1-353, that's it.
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:44.000]  It says that a violation of this act is an act of official misconduct, a class A misdemeanor.
[01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:57.000]  Okay, so I filed a, so even though, so they did say, you know, you got to contact Austin to get that information, but it's against our policy to give it out.
[01:07:57.000 --> 01:07:59.000]  So there's two different, two conflicting.
[01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:02.000]  That is not true.
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  Okay.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  You do not have to contact Austin.
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:07.000]  Right.
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  You can contact Austin also, but see if they'll go trip over themselves as well.
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:16.000]  But this was already official misconduct.
[01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:19.000]  It doesn't have to be the ones that created the records.
[01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:21.000]  They can be the ones who maintain the records as well.
[01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:24.000]  They have a copy of it that was given to them by Austin.
[01:08:24.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  And if they're saying that they have it there, but they're not going to show it to you, they've just violated the law.
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Well, there's another thing, the, the act says that if a public official receives an information request and that official is not the custodian of the records for the records that are requested, they are to forward the request to the custodian.
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:55.000]  They don't get to send you to somebody else.
[01:08:55.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  They're required to forward the records to them.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:03.000]  I would be interested to see that. I haven't seen that one.
[01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  Yeah, I don't remember where it sat, but I have to go back and look for it, but it's in there.
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:15.000]  They just said you can't, they can't just jerk you around and send you from office to office.
[01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:16.000]  Okay.
[01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:22.000]  So the next step at this point is file a criminal complaint against whom?
[01:09:22.000 --> 01:09:25.000]  Whoever you spoke to.
[01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:31.000]  Okay. So that would be pretty much the lowest level lady there or words as well.
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:33.000]  All right.
[01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:53.000]  You need to take criminal complaints down there. What I like to do is, especially when I'm, you know, I have a 1730 information request, I have a scope and content information request is make up a criminal complaint accusing them of violating
[01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:58.000]  that particular request, whatever request you're going to make.
[01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  Do you ask for this information? They denied it. You file this complaint.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  So then you go down there and hand them the request. And when they deny the records, then you call 911 or call if there's a bailiff around, call him over and hand him the complaint.
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:20.000]  It's already made out.
[01:10:20.000 --> 01:10:24.000]  They'll feel like you set them up.
[01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  Okay.
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:28.000]  And they'll be right. You did.
[01:10:28.000 --> 01:10:39.000]  All right. So, yeah, the thing that kind of stumbled me up was just they refused to accept the paperwork. I had it all made out and everything. I said, we cannot accept.
[01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  We can't accept documents from you.
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:48.000]  Not outrageous.
[01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:56.000]  So now you, how far away from you is that? Is it a long trip to get there?
[01:10:56.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  Five minutes.
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  Then go over there and ask for a bailiff and tell the bailiff that you were in here the other day and you attempted to file an information request and they refused to accept it.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:22.000]  That happened to me in Fort Worth across from City Hall in the property tax section.
[01:11:22.000 --> 01:11:27.000]  And he said that he couldn't accept that I had to file it somewhere else.
[01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  No, that's not how this is going to work. And the guy was really smart mouth.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:40.000]  So I turned around to the guards of the door. Hey, you come here.
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  You're all huffy, puffy. What can I do for you? Arrest that man.
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  Oh, that was so much fun.
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:55.000]  Next time I came in there, this guy could not have been nicer to me.
[01:11:55.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  If you start putting it, you put the bailiff on the dime and the bailiff is going to be real unhappy with the guy who got you to do that.
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:11.000]  He's not going to like being put on this dime. So it'll create lots of nice politics.
[01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:18.000]  And when you ask the bailiff to arrest someone, you become a protected class.
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  Now all of a sudden they have a problem.
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  They just frown at you the wrong way. Then you file against them for retaliation and they know that.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:32.000]  So have fun with it.
[01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:37.000]  Well, so I have a question about the nine. So let's say we do go to the 911 route.
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:39.000]  They refuse to accept the paperwork.
[01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  Call them.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:55.000]  What's the problem? Tell them where you're at and you need them to dispatch an officer to take your criminal affidavit of class A misdemeanor
[01:12:55.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  contact against this person. And sometimes you'll get some blowback from the dispatcher.
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  When the dispatcher asks, well, what all happened?
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:11.000]  You ask the dispatcher, are you the responding officer?
[01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:16.000]  And they'll say, no, I'm the dispatcher. Well, then dispatch.
[01:13:16.000 --> 01:13:21.000]  I'll give a full statement to the responding officer.
[01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  Excuse me, that's only good to dispatch out of the way.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  And then when the officer gets there, the first thing you ask him to do is arrest this person.
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:37.000]  Well, they can't arrest this person because they didn't see it occur.
[01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  So if I have a bailiff in the building, and if he could have seen them, he saw them.
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  You order him to arrest them because it happened within your site.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  The code says within your site or within your hearing.
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:58.000]  It does not say that you have to see it.
[01:13:58.000 --> 01:14:01.000]  You just have to say within your site.
[01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  You might not have been paying attention, makes no difference.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  Let them argue that in court.
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:14.000]  And then when the bailiff refuses to arrest, then you file against the bailiff.
[01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  The 9-1-1 officer refuses to arrest.
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:22.000]  You can't charge him criminally for that.
[01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:29.000]  But if he refuses to take your complaint, then you can charge him for shielding for 3805,
[01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:34.000]  shielding for prosecution, and that's a felony.
[01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:38.000]  It gets really ugly really fast.
[01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:43.000]  Taylor, another thing that you can do when those people are acting ignorant like that,
[01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:49.000]  you can say, well, sure, sure looks like somebody didn't have their mandatory training.
[01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:52.000]  I want to see, and here you go with a new records request.
[01:14:52.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  I want to see all the records.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:15:00.000]  I want to show me the certificates that you and all of your staff are keeping up in current
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:06.000]  on the mandatory training per 552.012.
[01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  The Attorney General mandates that you all have good training on this open records stuff.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  It looks like y'all are lacking in that area.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  I need to see your certificates.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:19.000]  Will you send me a copy of that request?
[01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  Today, I updated Jurisimprudence.website.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  I uploaded a whole bunch of stuff, and it's all your fault, Taylor.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:34.000]  I went to that.
[01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  He couldn't find, he couldn't get a document open.
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:43.000]  I went to the site, and I had all these documents all scrambled together in one folder.
[01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:47.000]  I went in there and sorted them out in separate folders.
[01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:54.000]  Then I knew I had some document forms that I had been developing over the years.
[01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:58.000]  I wouldn't have found all of those and loaded them up.
[01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  I got lots of stuff.
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  I've just loaded up on Jurisimprudence.website.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:08.000]  Lots of suits, different types of suits that I've filed.
[01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:11.000]  All kinds of motions that I've filed.
[01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  A whole bunch of stuff in there.
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  If you haven't looked at it in a while, there's a whole bunch of new stuff up there.
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:23.000]  The request that you have filed where you'll send those to me,
[01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:29.000]  I will rework those in generic format with filling the blanks
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  and load them up on the website so everybody can access to them.
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:37.000]  There's one other that stands out to me that might be interesting,
[01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  because Taylor, you went down there physically.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  Not everybody does that.
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  Some people mail them in or whatever.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:43.000]  Email, fax.
[01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  Okay.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  You went down there physically.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  They also physically fall off the cliff?
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:53.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:16:53.000 --> 01:17:08.000]  It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network Annual Fundraiser and Gun Giveaway,
[01:17:08.000 --> 01:17:11.000]  sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:16.000]  Any amount is appreciated.
[01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  Everything helps to keep us on the air.
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:30.000]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:30.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:48.000]  so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:55.000]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:01.000]  I love Logos.
[01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:07.000]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:08.000]  I need my truth back.
[01:18:08.000 --> 01:18:10.000]  I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:18:10.000 --> 01:18:13.000]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:16.000]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite
[01:18:16.000 --> 01:18:20.000]  and I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:35.000]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:41.000]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link
[01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:45.000]  No.
[01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:47.000]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:48.000]  No.
[01:18:48.000 --> 01:18:49.000]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:50.000]  No.
[01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  Wow.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:54.000]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  This is perfect.
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:18:57.000]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:58.000]  We are Logos.
[01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:08.000]  Logos, Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.000 --> 01:19:45.000]  Okay.
[01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  We are back.
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:49.000]  The rule of law radio.
[01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:50.000]  Randy Gelton.
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  I'm Brett Fountain.
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:55.000]  And we're speaking with Taylor in Texas.
[01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:58.000]  And Taylor, there's one other thing that's interesting.
[01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:00.000]  You physically went down there.
[01:20:00.000 --> 01:20:04.000]  Did you happen to see any signage prominently displayed
[01:20:04.000 --> 01:20:07.000]  over there talking about the rights of the requester
[01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  and the duties and responsibilities of the respondents?
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:16.000]  Did they prominently display that sign?
[01:20:16.000 --> 01:20:17.000]  That's fine.
[01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  I can just give you a hint.
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:21.000]  They didn't.
[01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  552.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:25.000]  Go ahead.
[01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:28.000]  During my conversation with one of the ladies,
[01:20:28.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  another one came by and handed me a form of Information Act
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:41.000]  that basically informed me where I could request these documents.
[01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  So 552.205 specifically says that they need to prominently display a sign
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:55.000]  and the form is prescribed by the Attorney General.
[01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:58.000]  It has to be, it has to face a certain way,
[01:20:58.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  has to have certain size and shape and fonts and everything.
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  It has to face the public.
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:08.000]  So the public can clearly see what are their basic rights
[01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:13.000]  and has to also face the employees of the governmental body
[01:21:13.000 --> 01:21:15.000]  who have a duty to respond to those requests.
[01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  I have never seen anybody put up these signs.
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  So I complain to the Attorney General about this.
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:25.000]  I make a big stink about it.
[01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:27.000]  Oh my goodness, your signs are missing
[01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  and I send a report to the Attorney General.
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:35.000]  Send me a copy of that report.
[01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  Okay.
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:39.000]  You'll load it up on the website.
[01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:43.000]  No problem.
[01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  Just a couple things for you to think about, Taylor.
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  Do you mind if I recap real quick?
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  So bring my two documents down there,
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:56.000]  the information that I want, scope and content,
[01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  one that's denied, 911, report official misconduct,
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  and move on from there.
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:10.000]  Is that the general scheme of things?
[01:22:10.000 --> 01:22:13.000]  Okay, you filed the scope and content?
[01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  I attempted to.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:18.000]  They said they couldn't take that.
[01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:21.000]  Okay.
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  How many, how many forms did you have?
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  Just two.
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  I had an information request for the policy and scope and content.
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  Who is, okay, what office was this again?
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:42.000]  DPS.
[01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  Ooh.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:50.000]  File against the director of the DPS.
[01:22:50.000 --> 01:22:52.000]  Really?
[01:22:52.000 --> 01:22:59.000]  As the carnal, as respondee at superior.
[01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  Since you were at the DPS and the DPS,
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:09.000]  file against whoever it was that actually refused to take your request
[01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  and file against it, direct you to DPS as respondee at superior.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:21.000]  So just to point of clarity, there are two pieces to this filing against.
[01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:27.000]  One of them is 552.353 calling it official misconduct,
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  and that goes to the attorney general of Texas.
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:33.000]  That's for that criminal complaint goes.
[01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:39.000]  Then you've got also a penal violation, 3903.
[01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:40.000]  Sorry.
[01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:42.000]  Hold on.
[01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  Unless they've changed it.
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:50.000]  When I read it, the attorney general had original jurisdiction.
[01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:52.000]  Exactly.
[01:23:52.000 --> 01:23:55.000]  In one instance.
[01:23:55.000 --> 01:24:06.000]  And that was, they changed the law to give him original jurisdiction in a complaint against a public official under 3903.
[01:24:06.000 --> 01:24:08.000]  That's been added.
[01:24:08.000 --> 01:24:23.000]  But before that, one instance, and that was a allegation of a violation of the Freedom of Information Act against a district attorney.
[01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:31.000]  You want to look and see if that specification is still in there.
[01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  The specification of the district attorney.
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  Yeah, it gave the attorney general original jurisdiction only in the case of a violation of the Open Records Act by a district attorney.
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:53.000]  They have definitely been acting on it when I send them something I send to the attorney general.
[01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  And it's not just been district clerks.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  It's been different county clerks and whoever's doing these violations of the act.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:05.000]  I report them to the attorney general and he is pretty quick.
[01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:11.000]  His office responds and they say, you know, we need one more piece of information.
[01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:18.000]  I just see where your records are question number three was and five, but I don't see number four here.
[01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:20.000]  They come back and they're quick.
[01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  They copy me on a letter that they send to slap their hand.
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  That is good to hear.
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  Yeah.
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:36.000]  We need to give some kudos to our current attorney general for actually doing his job.
[01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:40.000]  I think so as well.
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  And if Paxton's doing his job, he's one of the first ones is everybody else who wrote an interference for the public official.
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:54.000]  So that is really good to hear.
[01:25:54.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  Yeah.
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  I don't know about the district attorney part.
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:25:59.000]  I haven't seen it myself.
[01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:00.000]  Okay.
[01:26:00.000 --> 01:26:01.000]  Not noticed.
[01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:02.000]  Yeah.
[01:26:02.000 --> 01:26:03.000]  Check that part.
[01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:05.000]  They may have changed it.
[01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  But I was surprised when I read that part.
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  It made sense because everybody else who violates the act is committed in a class A misdemeanor and that would be filed with the district attorney because it's a public official.
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  So if the it is the district attorney who's committed the act, he would be the one to prosecute the case and he's the one accused.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  He would be disqualified. So they sent that to the attorney general before that at that time.
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  That was the only prosecutorial authority at Attorney General had.
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  And then recently they've added concurrent jurisdiction with the district attorney in the matter of a complaint against a public official for official oppression.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  I think that was because of this situation in Houston where the cops chased down this 120 pound 12 year old and kicked him and stomped him for a minute and a half.
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  Six cops.
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  I was surprised they didn't kill him with this, but the population come unglued and they made it a felony to commit official oppression with bodily injury.
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:55.000]  And that was also the time they gave the prosecuting the attorney general concurrent jurisdiction.
[01:27:55.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  Okay.
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  Before we tailor you're having you're getting to the fun part Taylor this is where the stars get in to get interesting.
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:14.000]  And, you know, if they're coming after you and okay users just a traffic ticket anyway so there's not much not much they can do.
[01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:21.000]  There's not much of anything you need from them. Now you can just beat them up with impunity.
[01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  So all I'm trying to get my target here is the guidelines for testing.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:32.000]  And so that's, that's the overall goal here.
[01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  For what testing.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:38.000]  I'm a worker driver life.
[01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:42.000]  Okay, he's going to take a test to drive a bus.
[01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  This is the CDL test.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  Correct.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:57.000]  And what he was saying was is that apparently someone got a wreck and got sued and the DPS got sued for not doing proper testing.
[01:28:57.000 --> 01:29:11.000]  So once that happened they got the instituted a draconian fix to where they got excessively difficult to deal with.
[01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:17.000]  Now he's looking for the requirements to make sure that they're not overdoing the requirements.
[01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:20.000]  And now they're hiding from him.
[01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:22.000]  Exactly.
[01:29:22.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  By the time you get to that test, they're probably going to want you past and out of there so you don't give him any more grief.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:34.000]  Okay, hang on.
[01:29:34.000 --> 01:29:37.000]  Do you have anything else for us, Taylor?
[01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  That should do it. I got my steps from here now.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  I'll call back next time when I have something for you.
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  Thank you.
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  Thanks, Brett.
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  Okay.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Thank you, Taylor.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain with our radio.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:53.000]  We're going to it.
[01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:56.000]  We've got one caller and two segments.
[01:29:56.000 --> 01:29:58.000]  So if you have a question or comment, give us a call.
[01:29:58.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  We'll probably have time for one more.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:02.000]  We'll be back.
[01:30:02.000 --> 01:30:09.000]  Could your pharmacy release your prescription information to marketers? Believe it or not, it's not only possible. It's probably been done.
[01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with loopholes that make it legal for companies like CVS to share your personal health information.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  Your pharmacy may be sharing your medical information without your knowledge or consent.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  For example, CVS pharmacies are likely to disclose your personal health information to business associates.
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:31:01.000]  The loophole in the law allows it if parties agree to execute a contract to, quote, safeguard the data.
[01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  Business associates could range from marketers to insurance companies, and while they might keep information locked up, there's no telling how it might come back to bite you.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:16.000]  Ask your pharmacy to disclose how it shared your previous data, and request in writing that it not be sold, rented, or shared.
[01:31:16.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  And most importantly, take your future prescriptions to establishments that guarantee real privacy.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:26.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:26.000]  To rememberbuilding7.org today.
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:35.000]  The new series deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what a new process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to rulelawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:48.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, the Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of your original 2009 seminar.
[01:32:48.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from rulelawradio.com.
[01:32:55.000 --> 01:33:00.000]  coffee today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:00.000 --> 01:33:20.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com
[01:33:30.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  The tools of natural capability, they come from natural divinity,
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:44.000]  they step by the roots of authenticity. The tools of regal dignity,
[01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:54.000]  rebuild the credibility. And I say, true to nature must be just as I believe.
[01:33:54.000 --> 01:34:03.000]  True to nature must be just as I believe. And though it's a daunting task,
[01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:08.000]  at least we got the decency as it must.
[01:34:08.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  And we're going to shame, but as soon as we're done with shame,
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:20.000]  Brett's got a story to tell.
[01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:24.000]  He's getting worse than me. He's out there causing trouble.
[01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  Shane, what do you have for us today?
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  And I apologize, I did not get to the emotion you wanted me to read.
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:40.000]  That's okay, Randy.
[01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:43.000]  It's been a busy day.
[01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:51.000]  Give us the synopsis of what that motion was, the change in the bankruptcy.
[01:34:51.000 --> 01:34:56.000]  He filed a bankruptcy to stop foreclosure on his mother's house.
[01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:03.000]  Did she do a quick claim to you or how did she get you?
[01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:10.000]  She did a quick claim with $1,000 consideration back on August 17, 2017.
[01:35:10.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  And not knowing the future, we had no idea how things were going to move forward.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:20.000]  Leaving aside that the whole case was sitting at the State Court in New York,
[01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:24.000]  and motions pending by the motions were absolutely fantastic.
[01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  They admitted to have lost the note.
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:30.000]  They admitted to a lot of things which I'm not going to get into right now
[01:35:30.000 --> 01:35:34.000]  because at the end of the day, the judges say, okay, they have no standing.
[01:35:34.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  There's no obligation to pay, but guess what?
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  Deny all that, grant summary judgments in favor of the non-party HFDC,
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  sell the property next month.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:48.000]  And then we didn't know the future, but the bankruptcy has really helped out tremendously
[01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:52.000]  because we're in front of a semi-honest federal bankruptcy judge.
[01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:56.000]  He's 100 times better than these lower court judges.
[01:35:56.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  These lower court judges, they smile, drink coffee.
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  Well, you're doing a great job, but I can't grant any of this.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:02.000]  Denied.
[01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:04.000]  And they do it with a smile, Randy.
[01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:09.000]  They do it with a beautiful, you know, Joker smile, you know, like the movie Joker.
[01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  It's absolutely incredible how corrupt this area is.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  I'm sure everybody wants to stay more corrupt than the others,
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:25.000]  and everybody's trying to be first place in it, but, you know, Buffalo is a horrible town
[01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  and very corrupt judges in the county, but that's a pretty amazing story.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:34.000]  But then we went to bankruptcy court, and then at the last minute,
[01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:37.000]  they're going to sell the property July 24, 2019.
[01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:41.000]  And that's when I found bankruptcy the day before the sale, and that's not that.
[01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  And now we're moving progressively forward.
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  And the nation started Mr. Cooper, which is located right near neck of the woods at the servicer.
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:53.000]  And they filed their motion to let this stay back in October.
[01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  That was granted.
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  And based on all the stuff I put on the record, they did not move forward and sell the property.
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:01.000]  So they handed it off to Keybank.
[01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  Keybank filed a motion to let this stay one day before Thanksgiving.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  And I didn't find out about it until, like, a week later, because somebody called me
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:15.000]  and they were checking my mail because I drove down to Dallas to visit family.
[01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:17.000]  I got family in Dallas.
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:20.000]  And so we had very, very little time to respond.
[01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  So we did.
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:24.000]  We filed a motion to reschedule based on the circumstances.
[01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:29.000]  And then David P. Case, the attorney in Rochester, opposed it.
[01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:30.000]  Says, you're not getting no extension of time.
[01:37:30.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  We're moving forward with the hearing.
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  So the judge's law clerk called me up and says, look, we need you to show up.
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:38.000]  But can you show up by telephone?
[01:37:38.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  And I said, no problem.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  So that hearing went on for a good hour and 25 minutes.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:49.000]  And the attorney representing Keybank, which is the second lean holder at the key lock,
[01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  which has been charged off about almost six years ago, Randy.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  That's where he's been charged off and even admitted he's been charged off,
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:37:59.000]  but they're still moving forward.
[01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:04.000]  But this attorney admitted on the record, he got really upset at the end of the hearing.
[01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  He says, this is ridiculous.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  This is going on for this long.
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  You know, he was almost yelling at the bankruptcy judge saying that this hearing is going on this long.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  And he goes, our attorney fees have superseded the amount owed on this property.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  And he goes, this is ridiculous.
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:23.000]  Well, I'm moving forward to try to have the whole hearing postponed.
[01:38:23.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  It's like it back up the Buffalo, which, you know, which, which that was denied.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:36.000]  But make a long story short, he granted the motion to list the state that denied the motion to dismiss the bankruptcy case.
[01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  And the attorney representing Keybank literally flipped out.
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:46.000]  And so I got right back up here, Randy, and found the motion for rehearing, which is going to be heard on Monday.
[01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:49.000]  And I already filed a notice of appeal.
[01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:51.000]  And I've already been working on the brief.
[01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:54.000]  So we're already ready to go because we know he's going to deny the rehearing,
[01:38:54.000 --> 01:39:00.000]  but I want to put some more stuff on the record because the bankruptcy judge signed an order stating,
[01:39:00.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  which was made by David P. K. C., the attorney representing Keybank,
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:07.000]  signed an opportunity to do the proposed orders.
[01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:09.000]  I don't even think you're ready to propose an order.
[01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:12.000]  But in that order, he says, I'm doing this bankruptcy in bad faith.
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  So that's where we're at there.
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:16.000]  I got the notice of appeal.
[01:39:16.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  I filed in for a poppers because the filing fees are super high here in New York, you know, the federal.
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  It's like $500, what's $505, I think, filing fee.
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:30.000]  So I filed in for a poppers to have filing fees based on my income.
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:34.000]  And he filed the attorney objected to my informer poppers to say, wait a second.
[01:39:34.000 --> 01:39:37.000]  He's got money to travel down to Dallas.
[01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:44.000]  And he said this many miles, he had to stay at this hotel and he made two pages long about all the money
[01:39:44.000 --> 01:39:46.000]  I possibly spent going from Buffalo to Dallas.
[01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:47.000]  Can you imagine that?
[01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:50.000]  And I drove by parents down here to see the family.
[01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  So he made a big thing about that.
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  He objected to my informer poppers.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:57.000]  He filed an objection to the motion for rehearing.
[01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  And all he did was cry and cry and cry.
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:02.000]  I filed four bar grievances against him.
[01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:06.000]  I filed complaints with the attorney general, the Consumer Protection Bureau.
[01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  And he says I'm harassing law firms and calling people up and harassing people and threatening people.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:13.000]  And it was like three or four pages long.
[01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:16.000]  Most of it is filled with lies.
[01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:18.000]  Very similar what Trump's going through.
[01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  They take one little thing and twist it and blow it right up to a huge thing.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:25.000]  So that's what we're at as of right now.
[01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:29.000]  So file a motion for sanctions.
[01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  The lawyer filed a motion to deny you informer poppers.
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:42.000]  The lawyer has no standing.
[01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:47.000]  The only one that has standing is the court clerk.
[01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:52.000]  Because the court clerk is the one that doesn't get paid.
[01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  Not the lawyer.
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  He has no standing in that issue.
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:00.000]  And he has never been able to file a motion for sanctions,
[01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  and that should get sanctions.
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:08.000]  We have to do that on our own.
[01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  We have to actually file the motions for sanctions.
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:12.000]  And that would be...
[01:41:12.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:16.000]  I believe that would be to file the district court because he filed the objection.
[01:41:16.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  No, no, no.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:20.000]  That would be filed in whatever court he filed the objection to.
[01:41:20.000 --> 01:41:25.000]  Well, I forgot to tell you one part of the story.
[01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  He filed the objection in the bankruptcy court.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:33.000]  The bankruptcy court issued a deficiency notice today that he needs to file in the proper court.
[01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  He asked to go to the United States District Court, which is the appellate court above the bankruptcy court.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:43.000]  Then File asked for sanctions against him. He's a lawyer. He knew better.
[01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  Accused him of doing that just to harass you.
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  I will say one thing that telephone hearing. I've never done that before.
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:04.000]  I didn't even know it was even existed until the law clerk for the bankruptcy court called me and says we need you to call it in at this number.
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:08.000]  It's a code and here's a security code. So I thought that was kind of thoughtful.
[01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:12.000]  At least they let me do that part.
[01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  Okay. How did that work out for you?
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  Actually, pretty good. I had a nice little script. The court was very quiet.
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:25.000]  And there was one moment where he says, look, I need some time. I need to review some of these things.
[01:42:25.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  And I think we waited about seven minutes, maybe 10 minutes, but he had to review what I was saying was true.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:37.000]  And I'm not going to sit here and give you a whole hearing over the phone here, but he was getting mad as the hearing was going on.
[01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:43.000]  He couldn't believe how long it was going on. The attorney that's allegedly representing Key Bank.
[01:42:43.000 --> 01:42:47.000]  I don't even think Key Bank knows the attorney fees have superseded the amount owed.
[01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  I don't think they even know what's going on because they make, you know, Key Bank's worth.
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:55.000]  Okay. Objection relevance.
[01:42:55.000 --> 01:42:56.000]  Right.
[01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:03.000]  So what? Your attorney fees exceeded the amount sold. Your problem, not my problem.
[01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:08.000]  Certainly not the court's problem.
[01:43:08.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  But what was interesting about it is he was telling me that, or not telling me, but telling the court in his motion to lift the state,
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:21.000]  he spent three pages about all the complaints I filed over the last five years.
[01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:28.000]  He filed complaints with the Consumer Protection Bureau several times, barred grievances, attorney generals.
[01:43:28.000 --> 01:43:32.000]  I mean, he'd listen. I mean, he was very notate. Then he made some false statements.
[01:43:32.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  But what was interesting about it is that I heard the music in the background.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  Yeah, I was just, I was actually looking at the clock this time.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain, rule of law radio.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  I'm not going to give out the call-in number. We'll go into our last segment.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  So hang on. We'll be right back.
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:44:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:44:06.000 --> 01:44:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:44:11.000 --> 01:44:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:44:17.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:40.000]  We have come to trust Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:44:40.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[01:44:52.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. Order now.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:07.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:18.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how, in 24 hours, you step by step.
[01:45:18.000 --> 01:45:22.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:22.000 --> 01:45:26.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:26.000 --> 01:45:30.000]  We have one with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:30.000 --> 01:45:37.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:37.000 --> 01:45:46.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:46.000 --> 01:45:55.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:55.000 --> 01:45:59.000]  Visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:59.000 --> 01:46:03.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:03.000 --> 01:46:26.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  Randy Kelton, Ralph Fountain, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Sean in New York.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  We're talking to Shane in New York.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:42.000]  I didn't say Shane. Anyway, okay.
[01:46:42.000 --> 01:46:50.000]  So the lawyer has filed a totally frivolous pleading.
[01:46:50.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  And now you're forced to have to answer this for your frivolous pleading.
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  You should ask for sanctions. Did the lawyer mention the fact that you bar-greed him?
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:07.000]  Oh, of course.
[01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:09.000]  Wait, I couldn't hear that.
[01:47:09.000 --> 01:47:11.000]  Yes, he did, of course.
[01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:13.000]  Oh, good.
[01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:24.000]  Because he's required not to say anything about that. That was an improper attempt to, it was an attempt to improperly influence the court, so you should grieve him for that.
[01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  Well, it's all in here. It says here that he has personal knowledge of the harassing mailings to the CFPB complaints, grievances that are in other cohorts sent to counsel or against counsel.
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  Then he goes on and he has personal knowledge of the state court actions.
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:46.000]  By the way, he's never showed up to one damn court date in the state court.
[01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:55.000]  He sends some other attorney in, and then they hire somebody else, and they take somebody else in. So it's absolutely, but here's one thing I want to read this one little section here.
[01:47:55.000 --> 01:48:01.000]  It says, that or continues to try to attack the validity of the secured creditor's mortgage and the right to the fore of staying.
[01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  Which was confirmed by the court order through state foreclosure actions in Erie County.
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:16.000]  However, such attack on mortgage and state court foreclosure actions, ready for this one, is barred. Worker Feldman, doctor, and sent secured creditor has a final state court judgment of sale.
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  Well, I've never been served. I've filed three motions to get into this case, all been denied, and they're moving forward when my mom does not own the property anymore.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:31.000]  And I had to try like hell to get into this case and I didn't file anything. It's stricken.
[01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  So he's trying to say, well, how can worker Feldman apply to me when you guys haven't even served me?
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:44.000]  Now, finally, somebody's recognized me. The bankruptcy court has recognized me as a real party of interest, and that's why the sale stopped.
[01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  The first time a court has recognized me. So Randy, the question is, and I asked you this before, can they move forward on an old state judgment from what year?
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:07.000]  A year and a half ago and use a party that no longer owns the property anymore, and I have never been served and I have did everything I could to get added into the case.
[01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  And they denied me to be joined into the case. I have good to be asked.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:23.000]  Well, if you were at the time of party and interest and you were not included in the suit, then you need to file a challenge subject matter jurisdiction to the original suit.
[01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:27.000]  I can't do that. It gets stricken and removed from the record.
[01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:35.000]  It's not a party of interest, but the bankruptcy court is actually, you know, finally acknowledging that I own the property.
[01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:40.000]  Okay. The bank, the federal court has acknowledged that you own the property.
[01:49:40.000 --> 01:49:41.000]  Right.
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  You, your name is not on it on the original suit. And that's the reason you file.
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:56.000]  Talk to Leslie. Send me an email. I'll send it to Leslie. That's exactly what happened in her. Her case.
[01:49:56.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  Her case was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction for failure to name a necessary party.
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  They didn't name her husband.
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  And he was an interested party. You're an interested party. They didn't name you, therefore, or the court lack subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  Well, that's the reason why I brought up the Rooker-Felvin Doctrine. They keep on bringing that up, which is complete nonsense.
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  Okay. Talk to Leslie. She'll share her briefs and pleadings with you.
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:36.000]  And hers are great. She does really good work.
[01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:45.000]  In the meantime, as the notice of appeal is moving forward, because I already filed it, I'm going back in for re-hearing on Monday, because I already know they're going to deny it.
[01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:48.000]  So we're going to have to go to the district court. So I'm getting ready for it.
[01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  Hopefully, I didn't mess myself up, but I already filed a notice of appeal, because I didn't want to miss the time.
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:03.000]  An early filed notice of appeal sits in the record till it's ripe.
[01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:04.000]  Okay.
[01:51:04.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  So it doesn't hurt anything.
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:08.000]  Will it be ripe? Okay, good.
[01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:14.000]  So your notice of appeal is automatically filed. When they say rule against you, it's automatically filed.
[01:51:14.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  Okay, good, because it's already in there. But the, well, you don't have much time to talk about that.
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  There's something I also want to tell you, but we're running out of time.
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:28.000]  But this guy, his name is David P. Case. Look him up. He's in Rochester.
[01:51:28.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  He's stolen thousands of properties as an attorney.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  And there's a profile that he's a big church person, family, and all this stuff.
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:45.000]  You know, I was robbing people all left and right, and they make these fraudulent affidavits. They file them into cases and they steal, because most people don't know what's going on.
[01:51:45.000 --> 01:51:50.000]  They lose their property and you're out. He's a real shikester.
[01:51:50.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  Okay.
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  And the things that he's done, and my mom over the last five years is incredible.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  Every time we followed stuff in the county court, state court, you would just mail everything backstage.
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  Your motion is hereby rejected. We're not going to acknowledge it. We're not going to answer it.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:12.000]  He just mailed everything back. I think he's done it probably like over 10 times in the last five years.
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:16.000]  Quick. Say that last part again. He's did what? 10 times?
[01:52:16.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  He mails everything back. You file a notice and a motion of dismiss for whatever reasons, like for example, you can't have two foreclosures going on at the same time.
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  Or you guys are missing the original note, and the record shows you don't even have it, or whatever the case might be.
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:38.000]  He takes the whole thing back up with the envelope, with a rubber band, and mails it back to us and say, we reject your motion.
[01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:43.000]  You don't follow the proper procedures, and he mails everything back.
[01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  The lawyer does? You care what the lawyer does. You care what the court does.
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:53.000]  I understand that. But see, most people wouldn't know what to do.
[01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:57.000]  They get intimidated and say, oh, it's been denied, but they don't know that the judge makes the final decision.
[01:52:57.000 --> 01:52:59.000]  Not him. That's what he does to people.
[01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:01.000]  Yeah. Okay.
[01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:05.000]  So, did you bar grieve him each time you did that?
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:12.000]  I already have. In fact, the court came back and said, it looks like you're looking for legal advice.
[01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:17.000]  Therefore, we can't do anything about that.
[01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  Wait a minute. Hold on, Shane. Move the mic a little away from you, down by your chin, because you're booming into the mic and distorting.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:36.000]  I said that we've already barred grievance, and the bar grievance came back and said that you're looking for legal advice.
[01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:42.000]  That's what the letter has, but I'll keep on filing bar grievances as the time goes further into the future.
[01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  Good. Good.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  File quick, file often.
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:49.000]  Right.
[01:53:49.000 --> 01:54:00.000]  Especially these real estate shysters, they've worked a horrible mid-treatment of the public.
[01:54:00.000 --> 01:54:03.000]  This is the worst ever.
[01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:12.000]  And, you know, this happens every 50 years, and it was the Templars who started this.
[01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:18.000]  They loan money for people to buy a property, and about the time they almost get it paid off,
[01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:24.000]  they crash the system, bankrupt everybody, take back all the property, and sell it to the grandkids.
[01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:28.000]  They've been doing that for 600 years.
[01:54:28.000 --> 01:54:29.000]  Right.
[01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:37.000]  Same thing that just happened, except this is the worst travesty of them all.
[01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:38.000]  Okay.
[01:54:38.000 --> 01:54:46.000]  I just wanted to give you a quick update on this case, but my last question to you is that since the notice of appeals in there,
[01:54:46.000 --> 01:54:54.000]  I don't think they can sell the – well, they could do whatever they want to do, but I don't think they can sell the property until the appeal has been fully adjudicated or heard.
[01:54:54.000 --> 01:55:01.000]  Okay. Hold on. Hold on. Have you requested findings of fact and conclusions at law?
[01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:02.000]  Well, that's –
[01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:06.000]  Oh, this isn't the fed, so you get a judgment with the ruling.
[01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:07.000]  Have you –
[01:55:07.000 --> 01:55:09.000]  Not at all, Matt.
[01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:18.000]  Have you requested – well, you got rulings against you. Did you file a request for reconsideration?
[01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:21.000]  That's what we're walking into on Monday.
[01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:24.000]  Oh, okay. Good, good, good.
[01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  I'm saying that because you need that to protect your appeal.
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:35.000]  Yeah. He responded back outside when I just read it, and my blood starts to boil.
[01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:41.000]  He keeps on claiming he's a secured creditor than they have. I mean, oh, God, I get so mad.
[01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:46.000]  You know how like you get so mad, you can't get it over the phone. You can't get it onto the show here because it's like unbelievable.
[01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:56.000]  It's like they commit the crimes, right? They smash your house, steal all your stuff, and then they charge you for the crimes. They just commit it.
[01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:05.000]  It's – I'm working on something to hamstring these guys, and I'm getting close to getting it launched.
[01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:13.000]  So if I get this thing launched, it will change the underlying structure completely.
[01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:19.000]  And we're hoping we'll eliminate a lot of this, but you're not going to eliminate all the shysters.
[01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:29.000]  If God made man, he made us horribly flawed, and that's not something we're going to be able to fix.
[01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:35.000]  So there's always going to be guys like this out there.
[01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:44.000]  Great. Let me ask you a last question here because I just – I don't know if this is something that you can answer, but I'm going to ask you.
[01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:55.000]  Has anybody ever filed or have you ever heard of anybody filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service, CID Department, the Criminal Investigation regarding a foreclosure, or is that something that's outside their scope?
[01:56:55.000 --> 01:57:06.000]  It has nothing to do with IRS unless you can show these guys are receiving income through the foreclosure that they're not reporting.
[01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  Yeah, that's impossible.
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  And that's another thing I'm going into on Monday because I asked the court – I desperately asked the court could I please my half, my evidentiary hearing.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:26.000]  You know, I filed a response back to reschedule the motion of the state, but I also filed a motion for an evidentiary hearing to have them prove that they own this debt.
[01:57:26.000 --> 01:57:28.000]  Where is it?
[01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  And they know they can't produce any of the original documents.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:33.000]  So that's what we're going back to on Monday.
[01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  That's a due process, right? You should add that right to the evidentiary hearing.
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:51.000]  If they don't bring original documents, then, you know, like the note and the data trust, primary the note, if they don't bring the original note, whatever they bring you object to, you've never seen that.
[01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:53.000]  You did not sign that.
[01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  Right.
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  What was it that moms gave originally?
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:00.000]  But they're trying to convert that over to me now.
[01:58:00.000 --> 01:58:05.000]  But if they do that, I have a right to see the original documents before I can pay them.
[01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:06.000]  Yes.
[01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:12.000]  And that's, I think Tina, that's an issue.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  Tina's is working through the courts in California right now is exactly that issue that they won't produce your original note.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:23.000]  Okay, we are out of time.
[01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Brett Fountain.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  We'll be back next week, next Thursday.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:43.000]  And for Thursday night, two hours show Friday for our four hour info marathon and check out Eddie Craig on Monday nights at eight o'clock central for his traffic show.
[01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Thank you all for listening and good night.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:59:01.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament recovery version.
[01:59:01.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  The New Testament recovery version has over 9000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 02:00:00.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.