[00:00.000 --> 00:06.760] The following news flash is brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown. [00:06.760 --> 00:13.160] Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019, open with precious metals, gold $1,429 an ounce, [00:13.160 --> 00:21.360] silver $16.45 an ounce, copper $2.75 an ounce, oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel, Brent crude [00:21.360 --> 00:29.720] $62.47 a barrel, and cryptos in order of market cap, Bitcoin Core $10,566.52, Ethereum [00:29.720 --> 00:41.360] $227.26, XRP Ripple $0.33, Litecoin $100.31, and Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 a crypto coin. [00:41.360 --> 00:52.480] In history, the year 1916, the preparedness day bombing, a time suitcase bomb, was detonated on [00:52.480 --> 00:58.240] Market Street in San Francisco during the World War I Preparedance Day Parade, killing 10 and [00:58.240 --> 01:00.280] entering 40 today in history. [01:00.280 --> 01:09.440] In recent news, since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325, legalizing HEPA to [01:09.440 --> 01:14.120] tax his law back in June, county prosecutors around the state, including Houston, Austin, [01:14.120 --> 01:18.040] and San Antonio, have been dropping marijuana possession charges and even refusing to file [01:18.040 --> 01:22.240] new ones, since they are stipulating that they do not have the time or the laboratory [01:22.240 --> 01:24.840] equipment to test the herb for THC. [01:24.840 --> 01:28.440] Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney, announced earlier this month that [01:28.440 --> 01:33.160] she was dismissing 32 felony possession and delivery of marijuana cases because of the [01:33.160 --> 01:34.160] law. [01:34.160 --> 01:37.640] Mr. Abbott and other state officials, including the Attorney General, stipulated in a letter [01:37.640 --> 01:42.120] to county district attorneys back on Thursday that marijuana has not been decriminalized [01:42.120 --> 01:48.280] in Texas and that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding of how HB 1325 works, as [01:48.280 --> 01:51.240] well as other cities too, like the District Attorney. [01:51.240 --> 01:57.360] In El Paso, Kyma Esparza, a Democrat who also stated earlier this month that the law, quote, [01:57.360 --> 02:01.760] will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso. [02:01.760 --> 02:06.800] However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball, an assistant public defender [02:06.800 --> 02:10.760] in Harris County, who stated that, quote, the law is constantly changing on what makes [02:10.760 --> 02:13.520] something illegal based on its chemical makeup. [02:13.520 --> 02:17.400] It's important that if someone is charged with something, the test matches what they're [02:17.400 --> 02:22.600] charged with. [02:22.600 --> 02:27.440] A paper by Tulane University identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark. [02:27.440 --> 02:32.360] As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico, the specimen being only the second pocket [02:32.360 --> 02:38.000] shark ever captured or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 in the East [02:38.000 --> 02:39.480] Pacific Ocean. [02:39.480 --> 02:44.200] According to the university paper, the shark secretes a lumus fluid from a gland near its [02:44.200 --> 02:50.040] front fins for the purpose it is hypothesized to lure and prey who may be drawn into the [02:50.040 --> 03:16.940] claw. [03:16.940 --> 03:18.940] This is what happens when you calm the cops [03:18.940 --> 03:20.940] This is what happens when you calm the cops [03:20.940 --> 03:22.940] You get your rights violated or you all get shot [03:22.940 --> 03:24.940] I'm thinking people being victimized by criminal cops [03:24.940 --> 03:26.940] Psychopathic predators [03:26.940 --> 03:28.940] Terrorize the neighborhood [03:28.940 --> 03:30.940] Decrypt with pepper spray [03:30.940 --> 03:32.940] They like serial killers [03:32.940 --> 03:34.940] Dacking out subliminal thoughts [03:34.940 --> 03:36.940] Forget what you taught [03:36.940 --> 03:38.940] Witness intimidation means that they can use it at will [03:38.940 --> 03:40.940] Code of silence means that the pigs will never let out a squeal [03:40.940 --> 03:42.940] And if they go to court [03:42.940 --> 03:44.940] They know the judge will make them a deal [03:44.940 --> 03:46.940] They stop me locking me up [03:46.940 --> 03:48.940] Stopping me confiscating my property [03:48.940 --> 03:50.940] Talking to my demigod [03:50.940 --> 03:52.940] Making them poor commodity [03:52.940 --> 03:54.940] Profiting off of poverty [03:54.940 --> 03:56.940] Alright folks, good evening [03:56.940 --> 03:58.940] This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show [03:58.940 --> 04:00.940] With your host Eddie Craig [04:00.940 --> 04:02.940] It is October 21st, 2019 [04:02.940 --> 04:04.940] We are almost done with this month [04:04.940 --> 04:06.940] Hell, we're almost done with this decade [04:06.940 --> 04:08.940] I gotta tell you [04:08.940 --> 04:10.940] Sleep would be a wonderful thing to have [04:10.940 --> 04:12.940] It would certainly [04:12.940 --> 04:14.940] Help me out [04:14.940 --> 04:16.940] Focusing here lately [04:16.940 --> 04:18.940] I have been so dedicated to working on [04:18.940 --> 04:20.940] Some technical drawings [04:20.940 --> 04:22.940] Or some things that I've come up with [04:22.940 --> 04:24.940] That I haven't gone to bed in two days [04:24.940 --> 04:26.940] I have literally sat here [04:26.940 --> 04:28.940] And either worked [04:28.940 --> 04:30.940] On different aspects of the project [04:30.940 --> 04:32.940] Or I have [04:32.940 --> 04:34.940] Waited on SketchUp [04:34.940 --> 04:36.940] To do its thing and drawing [04:36.940 --> 04:38.940] What I'm putting into it [04:38.940 --> 04:40.940] And I tell you as easy [04:40.940 --> 04:42.940] And fun as SketchUp is [04:42.940 --> 04:44.940] To use to make something [04:44.940 --> 04:46.940] And as frustrating as it can be at times [04:46.940 --> 04:48.940] The place where it completely sucks [04:48.940 --> 04:50.940] Is handling [04:50.940 --> 04:52.940] Drawings with minute detail [04:52.940 --> 04:54.940] Especially if there is a [04:54.940 --> 04:56.940] Lot of [04:56.940 --> 04:58.940] Vectors and [04:58.940 --> 05:00.940] Polygons [05:00.940 --> 05:02.940] In the drawing [05:02.940 --> 05:04.940] It just flat slows to a crawl [05:04.940 --> 05:06.940] And dies [05:06.940 --> 05:08.940] If you've got anything complicated [05:08.940 --> 05:10.940] You're trying to do a really small [05:10.940 --> 05:12.940] Whole patterned [05:12.940 --> 05:14.940] Wire mesh [05:14.940 --> 05:16.940] Model for the project [05:16.940 --> 05:18.940] In this [05:18.940 --> 05:20.940] And the [05:20.940 --> 05:22.940] Circle this mesh has to go around [05:22.940 --> 05:24.940] Is 3 feet [05:24.940 --> 05:26.940] Or 30 inches rather [05:26.940 --> 05:28.940] It's just a 30 inch [05:28.940 --> 05:30.940] Diagonal circle [05:30.940 --> 05:32.940] And this mesh has to go [05:32.940 --> 05:34.940] Stand about 3.5 feet tall [05:34.940 --> 05:36.940] And make that 30 inch circle [05:36.940 --> 05:38.940] And SketchUp [05:38.940 --> 05:40.940] Cannot draw that [05:40.940 --> 05:42.940] Mesh [05:42.940 --> 05:44.940] Without crashing [05:44.940 --> 05:46.940] It'll take several hours [05:46.940 --> 05:48.940] To do it even then [05:48.940 --> 05:50.940] And [05:50.940 --> 05:52.940] So I finally just gave up on doing it [05:52.940 --> 05:54.940] That way and came up with an alternative [05:54.940 --> 05:56.940] Method and it's still [05:56.940 --> 05:58.940] Even when I'm using just simple lines [05:58.940 --> 06:00.940] As the mesh [06:00.940 --> 06:02.940] I'm not adding any dimensions to them [06:02.940 --> 06:04.940] Nothing. I'm just drawing lines [06:04.940 --> 06:06.940] Again to SketchUp and making a mesh out of it [06:06.940 --> 06:08.940] And then scaling that mesh [06:08.940 --> 06:10.940] Either up or down to the size I need it to be [06:10.940 --> 06:12.940] And [06:12.940 --> 06:14.940] It still has [06:14.940 --> 06:16.940] Speed issues [06:16.940 --> 06:18.940] With drawing just lines [06:18.940 --> 06:20.940] With absolutely no polygons [06:20.940 --> 06:22.940] Other than what comprises the line [06:22.940 --> 06:24.940] It still [06:24.940 --> 06:26.940] Is abysmal. Yes I know [06:26.940 --> 06:28.940] There's other tools out there [06:28.940 --> 06:30.940] But those tools are better for modeling [06:30.940 --> 06:32.940] Not for measuring a model [06:32.940 --> 06:34.940] And [06:34.940 --> 06:36.940] Plus they're a lot harder to afford [06:36.940 --> 06:38.940] And so but [06:38.940 --> 06:40.940] Blender and all that what I'm doing is [06:40.940 --> 06:42.940] Once I get all these models done up [06:42.940 --> 06:44.940] Then I'm going to move them over to [06:44.940 --> 06:46.940] Blender and try to make an animated [06:46.940 --> 06:48.940] Object out of it [06:48.940 --> 06:50.940] So that I can show how this [06:50.940 --> 06:52.940] Thing I'm developing actually works [06:52.940 --> 06:54.940] It's an interesting thing [06:54.940 --> 06:56.940] But nonetheless it's left me without sleep [06:56.940 --> 06:58.940] For going on my third straight day here [06:58.940 --> 07:00.940] And so if I [07:00.940 --> 07:02.940] Seem a little out of it that will be why [07:02.940 --> 07:04.940] Now just so you know [07:04.940 --> 07:08.940] The call in number 5126461984 [07:08.940 --> 07:10.940] The lines are [07:10.940 --> 07:12.940] The phones are on [07:12.940 --> 07:14.940] So if you want to call in and get in line [07:14.940 --> 07:16.940] Then we can do that and I'll start taking calls here in a moment [07:16.940 --> 07:18.940] But before we start taking calls [07:18.940 --> 07:20.940] I want to get through this segment [07:20.940 --> 07:22.940] And this segment first thing I got to do besides [07:22.940 --> 07:24.940] Telling you I may pass on the keyboard here is [07:24.940 --> 07:26.940] Tell you to please go check out [07:26.940 --> 07:28.940] LogosRadioNetwork.com [07:28.940 --> 07:30.940] Take a look at our fundraiser [07:30.940 --> 07:32.940] If you've got enough to donate [07:32.940 --> 07:34.940] And get into the drawing for the prizes [07:34.940 --> 07:36.940] Please do so [07:36.940 --> 07:38.940] But any amount you can donate [07:38.940 --> 07:40.940] Helps us [07:40.940 --> 07:42.940] I hate to sound like an ad [07:42.940 --> 07:44.940] I have never been self promoting [07:44.940 --> 07:46.940] When it comes to asking for money [07:46.940 --> 07:48.940] It's just [07:48.940 --> 07:50.940] I've never felt comfortable doing it [07:50.940 --> 07:52.940] I don't like doing it. I feel that if people [07:52.940 --> 07:54.940] Appreciate what I helped them with [07:54.940 --> 07:56.940] And what I've done for them [07:56.940 --> 07:58.940] They should take it upon themselves [07:58.940 --> 08:00.940] To decide what that was worth and pay me [08:00.940 --> 08:02.940] Whatever they feel is relevant [08:02.940 --> 08:04.940] But the fact is [08:04.940 --> 08:06.940] Is that most people go oh great [08:06.940 --> 08:08.940] Well he didn't say I owed him anything [08:08.940 --> 08:10.940] And now that I'm done [08:10.940 --> 08:12.940] I'm going to keep it [08:12.940 --> 08:14.940] So it's not a business model [08:14.940 --> 08:16.940] That's for sure [08:16.940 --> 08:18.940] But you would at least think when [08:18.940 --> 08:20.940] You give assistance to people [08:20.940 --> 08:22.940] And you save them a bunch of money [08:22.940 --> 08:24.940] That they would at least be looking at the aspect of [08:24.940 --> 08:26.940] Doing this without him [08:26.940 --> 08:28.940] And if he's not there I may not be able to do it again [08:28.940 --> 08:30.940] So let's keep on [08:30.940 --> 08:32.940] Let me donate some of what I got here [08:32.940 --> 08:34.940] That would be nice [08:34.940 --> 08:36.940] If people thought that way [08:36.940 --> 08:38.940] But unfortunately it turns out they don't [08:38.940 --> 08:40.940] So here I am [08:40.940 --> 08:42.940] Peddling rule of law radio [08:42.940 --> 08:44.940] Like wares on a street corner [08:44.940 --> 08:46.940] Because we can't get enough advertising [08:46.940 --> 08:48.940] Into the budget and we can't get enough donations [08:48.940 --> 08:50.940] To make things go as well as we would like [08:50.940 --> 08:52.940] Which is to actually be able to survive [08:52.940 --> 08:54.940] The month [08:54.940 --> 08:56.940] We're barely doing that [08:56.940 --> 08:58.940] Even with the donations that have come in [08:58.940 --> 09:00.940] Which I haven't seen [09:00.940 --> 09:02.940] Any of because it's all going to cover the [09:02.940 --> 09:04.940] Other stuff [09:04.940 --> 09:06.940] Either [09:06.940 --> 09:08.940] I've paid out my bills and my rent on it [09:10.940 --> 09:12.940] And of course I've had [09:12.940 --> 09:14.940] Some lovely folks [09:14.940 --> 09:16.940] Metta and Pat [09:16.940 --> 09:18.940] Thank y'all very much for the rations [09:18.940 --> 09:20.940] That y'all sent [09:20.940 --> 09:22.940] I appreciate that greatly [09:22.940 --> 09:24.940] But the fact is folks [09:24.940 --> 09:26.940] Without your financial support [09:26.940 --> 09:28.940] We're dead in the water [09:28.940 --> 09:30.940] We're gone [09:30.940 --> 09:32.940] If we're gone you're without the information [09:32.940 --> 09:34.940] That we've been able to provide you with [09:34.940 --> 09:36.940] And the assistance that we've given you [09:36.940 --> 09:38.940] Without those things [09:38.940 --> 09:40.940] You would be stuck out here [09:40.940 --> 09:42.940] Either having to do this yourself [09:42.940 --> 09:44.940] Or losing [09:44.940 --> 09:46.940] Or just paying [09:46.940 --> 09:48.940] That's just the way it is [09:48.940 --> 09:50.940] With fans or butts about that [09:50.940 --> 09:52.940] I also asked [09:52.940 --> 09:54.940] Several times already [09:54.940 --> 09:56.940] And I'm going to ask again tonight [09:56.940 --> 09:58.940] If you are someone [09:58.940 --> 10:00.940] That I have helped win your cases [10:00.940 --> 10:02.940] Okay [10:02.940 --> 10:04.940] And you [10:04.940 --> 10:06.940] Can provide the paperwork [10:06.940 --> 10:08.940] That shows you won with either a signed dismissal [10:08.940 --> 10:10.940] Order or an acquittal order [10:10.940 --> 10:12.940] Or anything like that from the court [10:12.940 --> 10:14.940] I don't want the documents you filed [10:14.940 --> 10:16.940] If you're using the seminar [10:16.940 --> 10:18.940] Material and information for me [10:18.940 --> 10:20.940] I already know what the documents are you filed [10:20.940 --> 10:22.940] I want to see the order [10:22.940 --> 10:24.940] That ruled in your favor [10:24.940 --> 10:26.940] One way or the other [10:26.940 --> 10:28.940] And I want your permission [10:28.940 --> 10:30.940] With the email [10:30.940 --> 10:32.940] That you send it in [10:32.940 --> 10:34.940] Which just should say thank you for helping me [10:34.940 --> 10:36.940] I had such and such a case [10:36.940 --> 10:38.940] For such and such charges [10:38.940 --> 10:40.940] And I used your information [10:40.940 --> 10:42.940] And I won the case and the case was dismissed [10:42.940 --> 10:44.940] Or I was found not guilty or whatever [10:44.940 --> 10:46.940] I want to be able to use a screenshot [10:46.940 --> 10:48.940] Of your email and a copy [10:48.940 --> 10:50.940] A scanned copy of your order [10:50.940 --> 10:52.940] From that case [10:52.940 --> 10:54.940] And post them on the blog [10:54.940 --> 10:56.940] So that we can show [10:56.940 --> 10:58.940] How we're helping people [10:58.940 --> 11:00.940] To encourage others to learn [11:00.940 --> 11:02.940] To also encourage others [11:02.940 --> 11:04.940] To support the network [11:04.940 --> 11:06.940] And to listen to the network [11:06.940 --> 11:08.940] Because everything we do for you guys [11:08.940 --> 11:10.940] We try to make sure it is [11:10.940 --> 11:12.940] Accurate as possible [11:12.940 --> 11:14.940] And we provide you with the way [11:14.940 --> 11:16.940] And the means and information [11:16.940 --> 11:18.940] Necessary to verify [11:18.940 --> 11:20.940] Everything we're telling you is fact based [11:20.940 --> 11:22.940] Not simply our [11:22.940 --> 11:24.940] Concepts, not simply our [11:24.940 --> 11:26.940] Opinion [11:26.940 --> 11:28.940] It's either in black and white [11:28.940 --> 11:30.940] And there are certain inferences [11:30.940 --> 11:32.940] That can be made from it [11:32.940 --> 11:34.940] But there's a way about making inferences [11:34.940 --> 11:36.940] In law you got to adhere to [11:36.940 --> 11:38.940] And that's something else that we've tried to teach you over time [11:38.940 --> 11:40.940] One logical level of [11:40.940 --> 11:42.940] Inference based upon the facts at hand [11:42.940 --> 11:44.940] Not multiple levels of inferences [11:44.940 --> 11:46.940] Upon inferences [11:46.940 --> 11:48.940] Facts and evidence [11:48.940 --> 11:50.940] With one level of inference [11:50.940 --> 11:52.940] From those facts and evidence [11:52.940 --> 11:54.940] And the inference must be logically [11:54.940 --> 11:56.940] Concludable by a reasonable person [11:56.940 --> 11:58.940] From those facts and evidence [11:58.940 --> 12:00.940] For instance [12:02.940 --> 12:04.940] The fact is you dropped the ball [12:04.940 --> 12:06.940] Over the edge of a building [12:06.940 --> 12:08.940] And it fell downward, not upward [12:08.940 --> 12:10.940] Are the facts and evidence supporting [12:10.940 --> 12:12.940] The inference that if you drop anything [12:12.940 --> 12:14.940] That weighs more than air off the side [12:14.940 --> 12:16.940] Of a building it's going to go [12:16.940 --> 12:18.940] At least in some sort of downward momentum [12:18.940 --> 12:20.940] Okay? [12:20.940 --> 12:22.940] It's that kind of thing [12:22.940 --> 12:24.940] But there are so many people out there [12:24.940 --> 12:26.940] Right now spreading disinformation [12:26.940 --> 12:28.940] Spreading BS as fact [12:28.940 --> 12:30.940] It is ridiculous [12:30.940 --> 12:32.940] How incompetently inept these people [12:32.940 --> 12:34.940] Are at looking up and verifying [12:34.940 --> 12:36.940] The information they're spewing out there [12:36.940 --> 12:38.940] To when it absolutely is not [12:38.940 --> 12:40.940] And it is very easy [12:40.940 --> 12:42.940] To verify that it is not [12:42.940 --> 12:44.940] And they don't do it [12:44.940 --> 12:46.940] But [12:46.940 --> 12:48.940] People who don't know any better [12:48.940 --> 12:50.940] People who have never heard anything else [12:50.940 --> 12:52.940] People who have never listened to this show [12:52.940 --> 12:54.940] People who understand fact from fiction [12:54.940 --> 12:56.940] People who understand law, verification [12:56.940 --> 12:58.940] And vetting of anything [12:58.940 --> 13:00.940] Will get taken in by this stuff [13:00.940 --> 13:02.940] And I have sworn to stamp out [13:02.940 --> 13:04.940] That kind of stupidity [13:04.940 --> 13:06.940] And fraud [13:06.940 --> 13:08.940] In any way I can [13:08.940 --> 13:10.940] And that's why I'm here [13:10.940 --> 13:12.940] It started with my own personal business [13:12.940 --> 13:14.940] With the state and their corrupt practices [13:14.940 --> 13:16.940] And I have tried to take what I learned [13:16.940 --> 13:18.940] From dealing with all of that [13:18.940 --> 13:20.940] To you folks [13:20.940 --> 13:22.940] That's how I got invited to be a co-host on this show [13:22.940 --> 13:24.940] So folks were asking you [13:24.940 --> 13:28.940] Please go to LogosRadioNetwork.com [13:28.940 --> 13:30.940] Contribute to the fundraiser [13:30.940 --> 13:32.940] Whether you can put in a full [13:32.940 --> 13:34.940] $25 or not [13:34.940 --> 13:36.940] It doesn't matter [13:36.940 --> 13:38.940] The more of you that contribute [13:38.940 --> 13:40.940] Any amount of money [13:40.940 --> 13:42.940] To us as individual co-hosts [13:42.940 --> 13:44.940] Or to the network [13:44.940 --> 13:46.940] Is something [13:46.940 --> 13:48.940] It's more than we're getting from anything else [13:48.940 --> 13:50.940] Because we're not doing anything else [13:50.940 --> 13:52.940] And the reason we're not doing it [13:52.940 --> 13:54.940] Is because this takes a lot of time [13:54.940 --> 13:56.940] And effort to do [13:56.940 --> 13:58.940] I had to put all the stuff [13:58.940 --> 14:00.940] On dealing with the new version of the seminar [14:00.940 --> 14:02.940] The material down [14:02.940 --> 14:04.940] I've got to get my head clear of that [14:04.940 --> 14:06.940] For a little while so I can get my thinking back on track [14:06.940 --> 14:08.940] Because I'm getting burned out on it [14:08.940 --> 14:10.940] That's why I started working on this other stuff [14:10.940 --> 14:12.940] For the time being [14:12.940 --> 14:14.940] But at the same time [14:14.940 --> 14:16.940] I still got bills to pay [14:16.940 --> 14:18.940] I still got food to buy [14:18.940 --> 14:20.940] I still got to make a living until [14:20.940 --> 14:22.940] Something better comes along [14:22.940 --> 14:24.940] Or we have no choice [14:24.940 --> 14:26.940] And at the moment we're bordering on the no choice [14:26.940 --> 14:28.940] So please help us remedy that [14:28.940 --> 14:30.940] Please donate to [14:30.940 --> 14:32.940] Rule of Law Radio and Logos Radio Network [14:32.940 --> 14:34.940] Please donate to us as [14:34.940 --> 14:36.940] Individual co-hosts [14:36.940 --> 14:38.940] You're what keeps us surviving [14:38.940 --> 14:40.940] And trust me, we are not living high [14:40.940 --> 14:42.940] Off the hog here [14:42.940 --> 14:44.940] We are not living in no mansion [14:44.940 --> 14:46.940] Hell, I'm not even living in a full blown house [14:46.940 --> 14:48.940] I'm living in the converted [14:48.940 --> 14:50.940] Carport apartment [14:50.940 --> 14:52.940] Been here longer than I have lived anywhere [14:52.940 --> 14:54.940] In my entire life for a single period of time [14:54.940 --> 14:56.940] Okay [14:56.940 --> 14:58.940] I've been in this place [14:58.940 --> 15:00.940] What is going on almost [15:00.940 --> 15:02.940] 10 years [15:02.940 --> 15:04.940] If not actually 10 years [15:04.940 --> 15:06.940] That's the longest I have ever lived in one spot in my entire life [15:06.940 --> 15:08.940] The longest [15:12.940 --> 15:14.940] But somebody's got to be doing this [15:14.940 --> 15:16.940] Because the more disinformation [15:16.940 --> 15:18.940] Is pumped out there regardless of the source [15:20.940 --> 15:22.940] The more we get swallowed up [15:22.940 --> 15:24.940] By the things that are happening to us [15:24.940 --> 15:26.940] And losing everything [15:26.940 --> 15:28.940] That is near and dear to us [15:28.940 --> 15:30.940] From an American perspective [15:30.940 --> 15:32.940] A liberty perspective [15:32.940 --> 15:34.940] A rights perspective [15:34.940 --> 15:36.940] And I just, I can't let that go [15:36.940 --> 15:38.940] I'm not going to let that go [15:38.940 --> 15:40.940] They will have to kill me [15:40.940 --> 15:42.940] To make me let it go [15:42.940 --> 15:44.940] And even then they're going to have to come [15:44.940 --> 15:46.940] And pry it loose because it ain't going [15:46.940 --> 15:48.940] Without a fight [15:48.940 --> 15:50.940] And it sure as hell ain't going [15:50.940 --> 15:52.940] While I've got a viable breath left [15:52.940 --> 15:54.940] I need to do something about it [15:54.940 --> 15:56.940] So folks, here I am [15:56.940 --> 15:58.940] Whether or not I can stay [15:58.940 --> 16:00.940] That's up to you [16:00.940 --> 16:02.940] But we are getting desperate around here [16:02.940 --> 16:04.940] To survive and we really really need [16:04.940 --> 16:06.940] Your help to make that happen [16:06.940 --> 16:08.940] So please see fit to contribute [16:08.940 --> 16:10.940] Donate as regularly as you can [16:10.940 --> 16:12.940] And whatever amount you can [16:14.940 --> 16:16.940] If you've got enough to go into the fundraiser [16:16.940 --> 16:18.940] Every month do that [16:18.940 --> 16:20.940] There are some great prizes in the fundraiser [16:20.940 --> 16:22.940] I can't compete for any of them [16:22.940 --> 16:24.940] I don't keep myself a prize to what they are [16:24.940 --> 16:26.940] But we have never had [16:26.940 --> 16:28.940] So far anything less [16:28.940 --> 16:30.940] Than something in excess [16:30.940 --> 16:32.940] Of $1,500 value [16:32.940 --> 16:34.940] For whatever it's been [16:34.940 --> 16:36.940] It's either been a new gun [16:36.940 --> 16:38.940] A new gun part [16:38.940 --> 16:40.940] That was very expensive and hard to come by [16:40.940 --> 16:42.940] Or something of that nature [16:42.940 --> 16:44.940] So folks [16:44.940 --> 16:46.940] The prizes are worth the just one donation [16:46.940 --> 16:48.940] If you can win it [16:48.940 --> 16:50.940] By keeping us supported [16:50.940 --> 16:52.940] You get a whole lot more benefit [16:52.940 --> 16:54.940] Than just one prize [16:54.940 --> 16:56.940] Trust me on that [16:56.940 --> 16:58.940] Y'all hang on, we'll be right back after the break [16:58.940 --> 17:18.940] We'll be right back [17:28.940 --> 17:30.940] When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book [17:30.940 --> 17:32.940] Legal 101 [17:32.940 --> 17:34.940] You get four chances to win [17:34.940 --> 17:36.940] Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar [17:36.940 --> 17:38.940] And get 10 chances to win [17:38.940 --> 17:40.940] If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network [17:40.940 --> 17:42.940] Support our fundraiser [17:42.940 --> 17:44.940] So we can keep bringing you the best quality [17:44.940 --> 17:46.940] Programming on talk radio today [17:46.940 --> 17:48.940] We also accept Bitcoin [17:48.940 --> 17:50.940] And other cryptocurrencies [17:50.940 --> 17:52.940] And remember, every $25 donation [17:52.940 --> 17:54.940] Is a chance to win [17:54.940 --> 17:56.940] Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com [17:56.940 --> 17:58.940] For details [17:58.940 --> 18:00.940] And donate today [18:00.940 --> 18:02.940] Are you being harassed by debt collectors [18:02.940 --> 18:04.940] With phone calls, letters, or even losses? [18:04.940 --> 18:06.940] Stop debt collectors now [18:06.940 --> 18:08.940] With the Michael Meyers proven method [18:08.940 --> 18:10.940] Michael Meyers has won six cases [18:10.940 --> 18:12.940] In federal court against debt collectors [18:12.940 --> 18:14.940] And now you can win too [18:14.940 --> 18:16.940] You'll get step-by-step instructions [18:16.940 --> 18:18.940] In plain English on how to win in court [18:18.940 --> 18:20.940] Using federal civil rights statute [18:20.940 --> 18:22.940] What to do when contacted by phones [18:22.940 --> 18:24.940] Mail or court summons [18:24.940 --> 18:26.940] How to answer letters and phone calls [18:26.940 --> 18:28.940] How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports [18:28.940 --> 18:30.940] How to turn the financial tables on them [18:30.940 --> 18:32.940] And make them pay you [18:32.940 --> 18:34.940] To go away [18:34.940 --> 18:36.940] The Michael Meyers proven method is the [18:36.940 --> 18:38.940] Solution for how to stop debt collectors [18:38.940 --> 18:40.940] Personal consultation is available as well [18:40.940 --> 18:42.940] For more information [18:42.940 --> 18:44.940] Please visit www.RuleofLawRadio.com [18:44.940 --> 18:46.940] And click on the blue Michael Meyers banner [18:46.940 --> 18:48.940] Or email MichaelMeyers at www.yahoo.com [18:48.940 --> 18:50.940] That's www.RuleofLawRadio.com [18:50.940 --> 18:52.940] Or email [18:52.940 --> 18:55.940] M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S [18:55.940 --> 18:57.940] At www.yahoo.com [18:57.940 --> 19:00.940] To learn how to stop debt collectors now [19:00.940 --> 19:28.940] www.yahoo.com [19:28.940 --> 19:55.940] www.yahoo.com [19:55.940 --> 19:57.940] Alright folks, we are back [19:57.940 --> 19:59.940] This is Rule of Law Radio [19:59.940 --> 20:02.940] The call in number 512-646-1984 [20:02.940 --> 20:04.940] If you want to call and get in line [20:04.940 --> 20:06.940] Discuss the case, talk about whatever [20:06.940 --> 20:08.940] We can do that [20:08.940 --> 20:10.940] Just give us a call and get in line [20:10.940 --> 20:12.940] Right now we have two callers on the board [20:12.940 --> 20:15.940] First one up is Andrew in Pennsylvania [20:15.940 --> 20:17.940] Andrew, what can we do for you? [20:17.940 --> 20:20.940] Yeah, and a couple things about [20:20.940 --> 20:24.940] How to deal with cannabis and probable cause [20:24.940 --> 20:26.940] First of all [20:26.940 --> 20:29.940] The whole idea about probable cause [20:29.940 --> 20:31.940] And criminal offenses [20:31.940 --> 20:35.940] As you talked about in the show not too long ago [20:35.940 --> 20:37.940] It kind of raises the question of [20:37.940 --> 20:39.940] And also getting back to that [20:39.940 --> 20:41.940] Transportation script that you've made [20:41.940 --> 20:44.940] Like how the officer could fabricate probable cause [20:44.940 --> 20:46.940] By saying, smell cannabis [20:46.940 --> 20:48.940] Well, if there is no harm [20:48.940 --> 20:49.940] Then there is no crime [20:49.940 --> 20:51.940] Then how can simply smelling cannabis [20:51.940 --> 20:52.940] Be probable cause? [20:52.940 --> 20:54.940] No, again [20:54.940 --> 20:57.940] Okay, let's back this up for a second [20:57.940 --> 20:59.940] You start off on a false premise [20:59.940 --> 21:01.940] Once again, there is no harm [21:01.940 --> 21:02.940] There is no crime [21:02.940 --> 21:03.940] That is a fallacy [21:03.940 --> 21:06.940] That was not true even in the common law [21:06.940 --> 21:07.940] I know you know this [21:07.940 --> 21:08.940] And I know you've read the articles [21:08.940 --> 21:10.940] I've posted on that subject [21:10.940 --> 21:12.940] Many times on Facebook [21:12.940 --> 21:14.940] So let's get off the false premise [21:14.940 --> 21:16.940] Of saying no harm, no crime [21:16.940 --> 21:18.940] Because that is not accurate [21:18.940 --> 21:20.940] Okay? [21:20.940 --> 21:22.940] That is not accurate [21:22.940 --> 21:24.940] If I fired a gun into a crowd of people [21:24.940 --> 21:26.940] And hit absolutely no one [21:26.940 --> 21:28.940] That does not make my action any less criminal [21:28.940 --> 21:31.940] Just because no one was actually injured [21:31.940 --> 21:33.940] Are we clear on that? [21:33.940 --> 21:35.940] Negligence and intent, yes [21:35.940 --> 21:37.940] There is no negligence [21:37.940 --> 21:39.940] I intentionally fired it [21:39.940 --> 21:40.940] Or I negligently fired it [21:40.940 --> 21:42.940] It makes no difference [21:42.940 --> 21:45.940] If I strike absolutely no one [21:45.940 --> 21:49.940] Under your premise there is no crime [21:49.940 --> 21:51.940] Correct? [21:51.940 --> 21:52.940] Correct [21:52.940 --> 21:54.940] Well, that's incorrect [21:54.940 --> 21:56.940] There is a crime [21:56.940 --> 21:59.940] Whether it be intentional or negligent [22:01.940 --> 22:02.940] Okay? [22:02.940 --> 22:04.940] So let's make sure we understand that [22:04.940 --> 22:05.940] From the get-go [22:05.940 --> 22:08.940] Now, based upon that [22:08.940 --> 22:10.940] Continue with your question [22:12.940 --> 22:15.940] Oh, okay [22:15.940 --> 22:17.940] Well, my question was [22:17.940 --> 22:20.940] How can smelling cannabis [22:20.940 --> 22:22.940] Be grounds for probable cause? [22:22.940 --> 22:23.940] It's not [22:23.940 --> 22:25.940] And the Supreme Court has said so [22:25.940 --> 22:27.940] An officer's sense of smell [22:27.940 --> 22:30.940] Cannot establish probable cause [22:34.940 --> 22:36.940] Okay, so when you want it [22:36.940 --> 22:38.940] Now, he can claim it [22:38.940 --> 22:40.940] In order to get suspicion [22:40.940 --> 22:43.940] And then call a dog [22:43.940 --> 22:45.940] Who can then raise it to probable cause [22:45.940 --> 22:48.940] Which is also something that should never be allowed to happen [22:48.940 --> 22:51.940] So the dog cannot testify as to why he alerted [22:51.940 --> 22:53.940] And whether or not it was [22:53.940 --> 22:55.940] Actually related to drugs [22:55.940 --> 22:58.940] Or because as Hamer told him to [23:03.940 --> 23:05.940] But since it made him a police dog [23:05.940 --> 23:07.940] He'd probably lie under oath anyway [23:07.940 --> 23:10.940] And say, you're a smoothie [23:10.940 --> 23:13.940] If he could talk [23:16.940 --> 23:17.940] Right [23:17.940 --> 23:19.940] Okay, so [23:19.940 --> 23:21.940] Also, it's something that I've been [23:21.940 --> 23:23.940] Talking about with Reggie a couple of times [23:23.940 --> 23:25.940] About how an independent small area [23:25.940 --> 23:27.940] Here in Philadelphia [23:27.940 --> 23:29.940] There had been some rallies [23:29.940 --> 23:31.940] Of cannabis smokers [23:31.940 --> 23:32.940] And every time they light up [23:32.940 --> 23:35.940] That's when the police come in to arrest them [23:35.940 --> 23:38.940] So we have absolutely no [23:38.940 --> 23:41.940] Justifiable grounds to gang up on the police [23:41.940 --> 23:43.940] With our own set of handcuffs [23:43.940 --> 23:45.940] And handcuff them for arresting [23:45.940 --> 23:47.940] Us for something that [23:47.940 --> 23:49.940] Government has no authority to criminalize [23:51.940 --> 23:52.940] Right [23:52.940 --> 23:54.940] Government, okay [23:54.940 --> 23:56.940] You're talking about fairy tale land [23:56.940 --> 23:57.940] Versus reality [23:57.940 --> 23:59.940] Guess which one is going to win [24:01.940 --> 24:03.940] That is the reality [24:03.940 --> 24:05.940] Yeah [24:05.940 --> 24:07.940] So you saying government has [24:07.940 --> 24:09.940] No power to do blah blah blah [24:09.940 --> 24:11.940] And yet government has done it [24:11.940 --> 24:13.940] Is kind of a [24:13.940 --> 24:15.940] Reality versus fantasy statement [24:15.940 --> 24:17.940] Don't you think? [24:17.940 --> 24:19.940] Yeah, but my point is [24:19.940 --> 24:21.940] Fight or arrest the police anyway [24:21.940 --> 24:23.940] With ganging up on the music [24:23.940 --> 24:25.940] And what's going to happen is [24:25.940 --> 24:27.940] You're going to get shot [24:27.940 --> 24:29.940] Somebody is [24:29.940 --> 24:31.940] Almost guaranteed [24:31.940 --> 24:33.940] The moment a bunch of people lay hands on that officer [24:33.940 --> 24:35.940] If he is not immediately subdued [24:35.940 --> 24:37.940] If he gets loose for a fraction of a second [24:37.940 --> 24:39.940] Gets his hand on his gun [24:39.940 --> 24:41.940] Somebody's getting shot [24:41.940 --> 24:43.940] And God [24:43.940 --> 24:45.940] Helped the one of you [24:45.940 --> 24:47.940] That actually draws a gun on him [24:51.940 --> 24:53.940] As long as the law [24:53.940 --> 24:55.940] Gives the appearance of right [24:55.940 --> 24:57.940] To the government agent [24:57.940 --> 24:59.940] You cannot be right [24:59.940 --> 25:01.940] Regardless of how you feel or think about it [25:01.940 --> 25:03.940] Are we clear on that? [25:03.940 --> 25:05.940] Yeah [25:07.940 --> 25:09.940] Now when the law says [25:09.940 --> 25:11.940] You're very illegal [25:11.940 --> 25:13.940] And the people may use their [25:13.940 --> 25:15.940] God-given right to self-protection [25:15.940 --> 25:17.940] From a cop who is using unreasonable force [25:17.940 --> 25:19.940] To commit an illegal act [25:19.940 --> 25:21.940] Then you've got something on your side [25:21.940 --> 25:23.940] To make it work [25:25.940 --> 25:27.940] Do we not have that? [25:27.940 --> 25:29.940] Only if you can prove [25:29.940 --> 25:31.940] The unreasonable use of force [25:31.940 --> 25:33.940] And that it was not [25:33.940 --> 25:35.940] Justified from the get go [25:35.940 --> 25:37.940] That's what all those court cases [25:37.940 --> 25:39.940] John Baddell and all the rest [25:39.940 --> 25:41.940] Of them are talking about [25:41.940 --> 25:43.940] The officer not only [25:43.940 --> 25:45.940] Was making an illegal arrest [25:45.940 --> 25:47.940] But he attempted to do so [25:47.940 --> 25:49.940] By using a level of force [25:49.940 --> 25:51.940] Beyond that required to subdu the subject [25:51.940 --> 25:53.940] And the subject [25:53.940 --> 25:55.940] In return [25:55.940 --> 25:57.940] Killed the officer for his efforts [25:57.940 --> 25:59.940] And could not be convicted [25:59.940 --> 26:01.940] Because it had become self-defense [26:01.940 --> 26:03.940] But that's not how it works [26:03.940 --> 26:05.940] In the present day [26:05.940 --> 26:07.940] No, that is how it works [26:07.940 --> 26:09.940] In the present day [26:09.940 --> 26:11.940] But you dang well better [26:11.940 --> 26:13.940] Be able to prove it [26:17.940 --> 26:19.940] Right [26:19.940 --> 26:21.940] Also [26:21.940 --> 26:23.940] At a curiosity [26:23.940 --> 26:25.940] The Libertarian conference [26:25.940 --> 26:27.940] Is going on in Austin, Texas [26:27.940 --> 26:29.940] Next May [26:29.940 --> 26:31.940] Anyway, you can show up for that [26:33.940 --> 26:35.940] Which part of poor as dirt [26:35.940 --> 26:37.940] Did you not just understand at the beginning of the show? [26:37.940 --> 26:39.940] Okay, if I were to donate you [26:39.940 --> 26:41.940] The I'd only cost $69 to go [26:41.940 --> 26:43.940] If I were to pay for your ticket [26:43.940 --> 26:45.940] Would you be willing to? [26:45.940 --> 26:47.940] It's not a matter of a ticket [26:47.940 --> 26:49.940] Where am I supposed to go to get to this? [26:53.940 --> 26:55.940] Can't take public transportation either [26:55.940 --> 26:57.940] Yeah, I mean, you know [26:57.940 --> 26:59.940] If it took a dime to cross the street [26:59.940 --> 27:01.940] I ain't getting there [27:01.940 --> 27:03.940] Literally [27:03.940 --> 27:05.940] Right now the most expensive thing [27:05.940 --> 27:07.940] In my pocket is a bottle in [27:11.940 --> 27:13.940] Right, that's a shame [27:13.940 --> 27:15.940] It's also a shame you haven't slept in [27:15.940 --> 27:17.940] In two days [27:17.940 --> 27:19.940] And just for the record [27:19.940 --> 27:21.940] Just for the hell of it [27:21.940 --> 27:23.940] The decade doesn't end until the end of 2020 [27:23.940 --> 27:25.940] Because there was no years zero [27:25.940 --> 27:27.940] Out of it [27:27.940 --> 27:29.940] Just messing with you on that one [27:29.940 --> 27:31.940] Couldn't say we're at the end of the decade [27:31.940 --> 27:33.940] But you're not the only one who's made that mistake [27:33.940 --> 27:35.940] Well that depends [27:35.940 --> 27:37.940] If you start numbering into zero year [27:37.940 --> 27:39.940] Okay, is the decade at the beginning of that year [27:39.940 --> 27:41.940] Or the end of that year [27:41.940 --> 27:43.940] Even if you started at day one [27:43.940 --> 27:45.940] Is that year over [27:45.940 --> 27:47.940] At the end of that year [27:47.940 --> 27:53.940] And is that not year one of the decade? [27:55.940 --> 27:57.940] Year one of the [27:57.940 --> 27:59.940] Okay, well if there wasn't a year zero [27:59.940 --> 28:01.940] Then the first year ever had to be year one [28:01.940 --> 28:03.940] AD [28:03.940 --> 28:05.940] At the end of year nine [28:05.940 --> 28:07.940] The last day of year nine [28:07.940 --> 28:09.940] The very next day would have been [28:09.940 --> 28:11.940] A new decade [28:11.940 --> 28:13.940] Would it not? [28:13.940 --> 28:15.940] I thought a decade after me [28:15.940 --> 28:17.940] Okay [28:17.940 --> 28:19.940] Just messing with you [28:19.940 --> 28:21.940] Yeah, I slept for two days [28:21.940 --> 28:23.940] I forgive you [28:23.940 --> 28:25.940] I didn't say the beginning of year nine [28:25.940 --> 28:27.940] Alright [28:27.940 --> 28:29.940] Right [28:31.940 --> 28:33.940] Anyway, okay [28:33.940 --> 28:35.940] So anything else? [28:35.940 --> 28:37.940] Any place else you want me to travel to that I can't get to? [28:37.940 --> 28:39.940] Moon, for example? [28:39.940 --> 28:41.940] Alright [28:41.940 --> 28:43.940] That's cool [28:43.940 --> 28:45.940] Alright, thanks [28:45.940 --> 28:47.940] Alright, next up in line is [28:47.940 --> 28:49.940] Jerry in Pennsylvania [28:49.940 --> 28:51.940] Now Jerry, I got a minute left before break [28:51.940 --> 28:53.940] So you got about 30 seconds [28:53.940 --> 28:55.940] And then we'll have to cut you off [28:55.940 --> 28:57.940] And go to break, okay? [28:57.940 --> 28:59.940] Oh, yeah [28:59.940 --> 29:01.940] About the attorney [29:01.940 --> 29:03.940] The civil attorney [29:03.940 --> 29:05.940] Being the prosecutor [29:05.940 --> 29:07.940] Right [29:07.940 --> 29:09.940] He's been prosecuting me [29:09.940 --> 29:11.940] And I was wondering [29:11.940 --> 29:13.940] How the city is turning [29:13.940 --> 29:15.940] And let's say [29:15.940 --> 29:17.940] Working for the [29:17.940 --> 29:19.940] Prosecutor's Office [29:19.940 --> 29:21.940] Because it says on my court record [29:21.940 --> 29:23.940] He's listed as a [29:23.940 --> 29:25.940] Special Prosecutor [29:25.940 --> 29:27.940] It depends on what kind of case we're talking about [29:27.940 --> 29:29.940] If we're talking about a city administrative case [29:29.940 --> 29:31.940] That's why [29:31.940 --> 29:33.940] If you're talking about a state criminal case [29:33.940 --> 29:35.940] And your state constitution [29:35.940 --> 29:37.940] Does not empower [29:37.940 --> 29:39.940] Anyone other than a county or [29:39.940 --> 29:41.940] District attorney [29:41.940 --> 29:43.940] To prosecute in the name of the state [29:43.940 --> 29:45.940] Like it does here in Texas [29:45.940 --> 29:47.940] Then there would have to be some other legal basis [29:47.940 --> 29:49.940] For which they would have gotten that power [29:49.940 --> 29:51.940] Or it's not a legitimate power [29:51.940 --> 29:53.940] Hang on just a second [29:53.940 --> 29:55.940] We'll pick this up on the other side [29:55.940 --> 29:57.940] Folks, y'all hang on, we shall return [30:01.940 --> 30:03.940] Thousands of Florida motorists [30:03.940 --> 30:05.940] Convicted of DUI may very well [30:05.940 --> 30:07.940] Have been driving under the blood alcohol limit [30:07.940 --> 30:09.940] Dr. Catherine Albrecht [30:09.940 --> 30:11.940] And I'll be back with a tale of bad breathalysers [30:11.940 --> 30:39.940] And a government cover-up in a moment [30:41.940 --> 30:43.940] With Stark Page [31:11.940 --> 31:31.940] This is Building 7 [31:31.940 --> 31:33.940] A 47-story skyscraper [31:33.940 --> 31:35.940] That fell on the afternoon of September 11 [31:35.940 --> 31:37.940] The government says that fire brought it down [31:37.940 --> 31:39.940] However, 1,500 architects and engineers [31:39.940 --> 31:41.940] Have concluded it was a controlled demolition [31:41.940 --> 31:43.940] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members [31:43.940 --> 31:45.940] Have given their lives [31:45.940 --> 31:47.940] And thousands of my fellow force respond to supply [31:47.940 --> 31:49.940] I'm not a conspiracy theorist [31:49.940 --> 31:51.940] I'm a structural engineer [31:51.940 --> 31:53.940] I'm an Air Force pilot [31:53.940 --> 31:55.940] I'm a father who lost his son [31:55.940 --> 31:57.940] We're Americans and we deserve the truth [31:57.940 --> 31:59.940] Go to RememberBuilding7.org [31:59.940 --> 32:01.940] Today [32:01.940 --> 32:03.940] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer [32:03.940 --> 32:05.940] The Rule of Law Traffic Seminar [32:05.940 --> 32:07.940] In today's America we live in an us against them society [32:07.940 --> 32:09.940] That people are never going to have a free society [32:09.940 --> 32:11.940] And we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights [32:11.940 --> 32:13.940] Among those rights are the right [32:13.940 --> 32:15.940] To travel freely from place to place [32:15.940 --> 32:17.940] The right to act in our own private capacity [32:17.940 --> 32:19.940] And most importantly, the right to due process of law [32:19.940 --> 32:21.940] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity [32:21.940 --> 32:23.940] To learn how to enforce and preserve our rights [32:23.940 --> 32:25.940] Through due process [32:25.940 --> 32:27.940] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig [32:27.940 --> 32:29.940] In conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together [32:29.940 --> 32:31.940] The most comprehensive teaching tool available [32:31.940 --> 32:33.940] That will help you understand what due process is [32:33.940 --> 32:35.940] And how to hold courts to the rule of law [32:35.940 --> 32:37.940] To learn copy of this invaluable material [32:37.940 --> 32:39.940] By going to RuleofLawRadio.com [32:39.940 --> 32:41.940] And ordering your copy today [32:41.940 --> 32:43.940] By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book [32:43.940 --> 32:45.940] The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie [32:45.940 --> 32:47.940] Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar [32:47.940 --> 32:49.940] Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material [32:49.940 --> 32:51.940] Learn how to fight for your rights [32:51.940 --> 32:53.940] With the help of this material from RuleofLawRadio.com [32:53.940 --> 32:55.940] Order your copy today [32:55.940 --> 32:57.940] And together we can have free society [32:57.940 --> 32:59.940] We all want and deserve [33:01.940 --> 33:03.940] Live Free Speech Radio [33:03.940 --> 33:05.940] LogosRadionetwork.com [33:33.940 --> 33:35.940] All right folks, we are back. [33:35.940 --> 33:37.940] This is Rule of Law Radio [33:37.940 --> 33:39.940] The calling number 512-646-1984 [33:39.940 --> 33:41.940] And we are talking to Jerry in Pennsylvania [33:41.940 --> 33:43.940] All right Jerry, please continue [33:43.940 --> 33:45.940] Yeah, he's talking to me on the city ordinance [33:45.940 --> 33:47.940] Okay, but that's not the point [33:47.940 --> 33:49.940] Okay, the city ordinance [33:49.940 --> 33:51.940] In order to be valid for prosecuting one person [33:51.940 --> 33:53.940] For prosecuting another person [33:53.940 --> 33:55.940] For prosecuting another person [33:55.940 --> 33:57.940] For prosecuting another person [33:57.940 --> 33:59.940] For prosecuting another person [33:59.940 --> 34:01.940] For prosecuting another person [34:01.940 --> 34:03.940] In order to be valid for prosecuting [34:03.940 --> 34:05.940] One of the people of the state has to be based [34:05.940 --> 34:07.940] Upon some state law [34:07.940 --> 34:09.940] Unless your state constitution [34:09.940 --> 34:11.940] Specifically authorizes [34:11.940 --> 34:13.940] Political subdivisions of the state [34:13.940 --> 34:15.940] To enact publicly binding [34:15.940 --> 34:17.940] Legislature [34:17.940 --> 34:19.940] Okay, here in Texas it does not [34:19.940 --> 34:21.940] I can't say that's true of Pennsylvania [34:21.940 --> 34:23.940] Okay, so you need to look it up [34:23.940 --> 34:25.940] And find out [34:25.940 --> 34:27.940] But here in Texas the power [34:27.940 --> 34:29.940] To prosecute in the name of the state [34:29.940 --> 34:31.940] Specifically delegated in the words [34:31.940 --> 34:33.940] Of our constitution [34:33.940 --> 34:35.940] To a county or district attorney [34:35.940 --> 34:37.940] And no one else [34:37.940 --> 34:39.940] A constitutionally delegated power [34:39.940 --> 34:41.940] By supreme court ruling and understating [34:41.940 --> 34:43.940] Cannot be redelegated [34:43.940 --> 34:45.940] Therefore [34:45.940 --> 34:47.940] And the [34:47.940 --> 34:49.940] Texas constitution while it authorizes [34:49.940 --> 34:51.940] The legislature [34:51.940 --> 34:53.940] To create statutory courts [34:53.940 --> 34:55.940] It in no way [34:55.940 --> 34:57.940] Authorizes the legislature [34:57.940 --> 34:59.940] To create new positions [34:59.940 --> 35:01.940] For prosecutors [35:01.940 --> 35:03.940] Outside of the county and district attorney [35:03.940 --> 35:05.940] So here in Texas [35:05.940 --> 35:07.940] I can say without a shred [35:07.940 --> 35:09.940] Of reservation [35:09.940 --> 35:11.940] That it is absolutely unconstitutional [35:11.940 --> 35:13.940] To be prosecuted for any state law [35:13.940 --> 35:15.940] By a city attorney [35:15.940 --> 35:17.940] Okay [35:17.940 --> 35:19.940] Doesn't mean they're not doing it [35:19.940 --> 35:21.940] But it's unconstitutional [35:21.940 --> 35:23.940] And no one has bothered to challenge it [35:23.940 --> 35:25.940] Is such [35:25.940 --> 35:27.940] But they should [35:27.940 --> 35:29.940] Because it's absolutely correct [35:29.940 --> 35:31.940] Not only that, they should be challenging [35:31.940 --> 35:33.940] The court they're in [35:33.940 --> 35:35.940] Because if the court itself was established [35:35.940 --> 35:37.940] By city ordinance [35:37.940 --> 35:39.940] Then it too is in direct violation [35:39.940 --> 35:41.940] Of the state constitution [35:41.940 --> 35:43.940] Despite the fact the Texas legislature [35:43.940 --> 35:45.940] Tried to pass statutory law [35:45.940 --> 35:47.940] That delegates their power [35:47.940 --> 35:49.940] To create statutory courts [35:49.940 --> 35:51.940] To the political subdivisions themselves [35:51.940 --> 35:53.940] Which they cannot do [35:53.940 --> 35:55.940] But no one has challenged it [35:55.940 --> 35:57.940] On those grounds [35:57.940 --> 35:59.940] So as far as your issue [35:59.940 --> 36:01.940] With the city attorney [36:01.940 --> 36:03.940] These other things need to be verified [36:03.940 --> 36:05.940] One way or the other before you get [36:05.940 --> 36:07.940] In an uproar about it [36:07.940 --> 36:09.940] Because you don't know if you're standing [36:09.940 --> 36:11.940] On solid legal ground when you do [36:11.940 --> 36:13.940] If you haven't [36:15.940 --> 36:17.940] Oh no, I've been following [36:17.940 --> 36:19.940] In the federal court [36:19.940 --> 36:21.940] But I just couldn't quite [36:21.940 --> 36:23.940] Know how to write up [36:23.940 --> 36:25.940] That within the court record [36:25.940 --> 36:27.940] It says in there [36:27.940 --> 36:29.940] A special prosecutor [36:29.940 --> 36:31.940] And I know from the federal [36:31.940 --> 36:33.940] Government when they [36:33.940 --> 36:35.940] How did we get on the issue of [36:35.940 --> 36:37.940] The federal government from a city attorney [36:39.940 --> 36:41.940] They're not filed in the Fed [36:41.940 --> 36:43.940] I can't file a law [36:43.940 --> 36:45.940] Well I know there's no way [36:45.940 --> 36:47.940] In God's green earth that a city attorney [36:47.940 --> 36:49.940] Was prosecuting you in federal court [36:49.940 --> 36:51.940] No, he was [36:51.940 --> 36:53.940] In local court [36:53.940 --> 36:55.940] Then what issue are we dealing with here [36:55.940 --> 36:57.940] The fact that the city attorney [36:57.940 --> 36:59.940] Prosecuted you or something dealing [36:59.940 --> 37:01.940] With what you filed in federal court [37:01.940 --> 37:03.940] I'm suing the [37:03.940 --> 37:05.940] I'm suing the city attorney [37:05.940 --> 37:07.940] You're suing the city attorney in federal court [37:07.940 --> 37:09.940] Yep [37:09.940 --> 37:11.940] Okay, then this all goes back [37:11.940 --> 37:13.940] To everything I've just said [37:13.940 --> 37:15.940] Are you positive [37:15.940 --> 37:17.940] That you are standing on solid [37:17.940 --> 37:19.940] Legal ground under your state [37:19.940 --> 37:21.940] Constitution and laws to make [37:21.940 --> 37:23.940] That suit stick [37:23.940 --> 37:25.940] Of course [37:25.940 --> 37:27.940] I'll use the article [37:27.940 --> 37:29.940] Three [37:29.940 --> 37:31.940] One through ten [37:31.940 --> 37:33.940] That says how laws are made [37:33.940 --> 37:35.940] In Pennsylvania [37:35.940 --> 37:37.940] Okay, that's how laws are made [37:37.940 --> 37:39.940] What's that got to do with who can [37:39.940 --> 37:41.940] Prosecute in the name of the state [37:41.940 --> 37:43.940] That's a completely different part [37:43.940 --> 37:45.940] Of the Constitution [37:45.940 --> 37:47.940] That they call you [37:47.940 --> 37:49.940] Well, why? I don't live in Pennsylvania [37:49.940 --> 37:51.940] If you found the part on how laws [37:51.940 --> 37:53.940] Of Pennsylvania are made, why can't you find [37:53.940 --> 37:55.940] The part on who is able to prosecute [37:55.940 --> 37:57.940] The name of the state [37:57.940 --> 37:59.940] I just wanted to make sure [37:59.940 --> 38:01.940] I was on solid ground [38:01.940 --> 38:03.940] Okay, so let me get this straight [38:03.940 --> 38:05.940] You found [38:05.940 --> 38:07.940] The part of the [38:07.940 --> 38:09.940] Pennsylvania Constitution [38:09.940 --> 38:11.940] That says how laws are made [38:11.940 --> 38:13.940] That would be the legislative [38:13.940 --> 38:15.940] Provisions of your state [38:15.940 --> 38:17.940] Constitution, right? [38:17.940 --> 38:19.940] Right. Which are not the judicial [38:19.940 --> 38:21.940] Department provisions, right? [38:21.940 --> 38:23.940] Right. [38:23.940 --> 38:25.940] The judicial department provisions [38:25.940 --> 38:27.940] Would tell us who [38:27.940 --> 38:29.940] Is given the power to prosecute [38:29.940 --> 38:31.940] State crimes in the name [38:31.940 --> 38:33.940] Of the state, would it not? [38:35.940 --> 38:37.940] So look under judicial [38:37.940 --> 38:39.940] Yeah, but the problem [38:39.940 --> 38:41.940] Here is, you said you're already [38:41.940 --> 38:43.940] Sue them in federal court [38:43.940 --> 38:45.940] You already know you're standing on solid legal ground [38:45.940 --> 38:47.940] And yet you didn't know [38:47.940 --> 38:49.940] That you had to look under the judicial [38:49.940 --> 38:51.940] Part of your Constitution to find out [38:51.940 --> 38:53.940] Who is empowered to prosecute [38:53.940 --> 38:55.940] Well, I'm going to have to go out on a limb here [38:55.940 --> 38:57.940] And say I am not holding high hopes [38:57.940 --> 38:59.940] For your success in federal court [38:59.940 --> 39:01.940] Why? [39:01.940 --> 39:03.940] Because you [39:03.940 --> 39:05.940] Could not have possibly stated [39:05.940 --> 39:07.940] Any legal basis for making the suit [39:07.940 --> 39:09.940] Against a city attorney [39:09.940 --> 39:11.940] Not being allowed to prosecute [39:11.940 --> 39:13.940] If you didn't cite the state [39:13.940 --> 39:15.940] Constitution provisions that says they can't [39:19.940 --> 39:21.940] So what legal basis did you give [39:21.940 --> 39:23.940] The federal court to have any jurisdiction [39:23.940 --> 39:25.940] To hear the case and make a ruling? [39:25.940 --> 39:27.940] What issue did you raise [39:27.940 --> 39:29.940] With them other than I don't think it's fair? [39:31.940 --> 39:33.940] That the ordinance is not legal [39:33.940 --> 39:35.940] Because there is one that is passed [39:35.940 --> 39:37.940] By the state legislature [39:37.940 --> 39:39.940] And the ordinance is not legal [39:39.940 --> 39:41.940] A suit against the city attorney [39:43.940 --> 39:45.940] No, I wanted to put that in there [39:45.940 --> 39:47.940] Since the city [39:47.940 --> 39:49.940] Well, you can't defend the criminal charge [39:49.940 --> 39:51.940] And a lawsuit in the same [39:51.940 --> 39:53.940] Suit [39:53.940 --> 39:55.940] It doesn't work that way [39:55.940 --> 39:57.940] I just wanted to add that to it [39:57.940 --> 39:59.940] There's nothing to add to it [39:59.940 --> 40:01.940] You can't add that to it [40:03.940 --> 40:05.940] You're trying to raise multiple issues [40:05.940 --> 40:07.940] Without clarifying what the issues are [40:07.940 --> 40:09.940] You've gone to the federal court [40:09.940 --> 40:11.940] Claiming that the ordinance [40:11.940 --> 40:13.940] Is the problem [40:13.940 --> 40:15.940] Not the city attorney [40:15.940 --> 40:17.940] So how do you expect to get a ruling [40:17.940 --> 40:19.940] Against the city attorney for anything? [40:23.940 --> 40:25.940] Because [40:25.940 --> 40:27.940] He is [40:27.940 --> 40:29.940] Not following law [40:29.940 --> 40:31.940] He [40:31.940 --> 40:33.940] Has what he's [40:33.940 --> 40:35.940] Conflict of interest [40:37.940 --> 40:39.940] Working for the city [40:39.940 --> 40:41.940] And working for the prosecutor's office [40:41.940 --> 40:43.940] Do you understand the process [40:43.940 --> 40:45.940] For how to make the argument [40:45.940 --> 40:47.940] About [40:47.940 --> 40:49.940] Conflict of interest when it comes to those people? [40:51.940 --> 40:53.940] No, I haven't gotten that one yet [40:53.940 --> 40:55.940] You haven't gotten it [40:55.940 --> 40:57.940] How in the hell did you put it in a lawsuit? [40:57.940 --> 40:59.940] How in the hell did you put it in a criminal defense suit? [40:59.940 --> 41:01.940] An appeal suit [41:01.940 --> 41:03.940] Whatever suit you think it is you filed [41:05.940 --> 41:07.940] How could you possibly [41:07.940 --> 41:09.940] Stay in the chance of winning [41:09.940 --> 41:11.940] When all this information is going to be [41:11.940 --> 41:13.940] Absolutely required and yet you're sitting here [41:13.940 --> 41:15.940] Telling me that you don't know any of it [41:17.940 --> 41:19.940] How do you expect to win this case? [41:19.940 --> 41:21.940] How do you even expect to get past [41:21.940 --> 41:23.940] The filing fee? [41:25.940 --> 41:27.940] Oh, I'm fine with the profit [41:27.940 --> 41:29.940] You're filing informal poppers? [41:31.940 --> 41:33.940] Yeah [41:33.940 --> 41:35.940] Let me tell you what's going to happen [41:35.940 --> 41:37.940] When you file this suit based upon the information [41:37.940 --> 41:39.940] You've given me so far [41:39.940 --> 41:41.940] When you claim informal poppers [41:41.940 --> 41:43.940] If you file this suit [41:43.940 --> 41:45.940] Using the information you currently have [41:45.940 --> 41:47.940] In the manner you have described thus far [41:49.940 --> 41:51.940] The court is going to dismiss it [41:51.940 --> 41:53.940] The court is going to sanction you [41:53.940 --> 41:55.940] Then the court is going to order [41:55.940 --> 41:57.940] That no further filings [41:57.940 --> 41:59.940] Will be accepted from you [41:59.940 --> 42:01.940] Because you are a vexatious litigant [42:03.940 --> 42:05.940] And you will never be able to [42:05.940 --> 42:07.940] File another lawsuit in formal poppers [42:07.940 --> 42:09.940] Whether you're right or not [42:11.940 --> 42:13.940] Without the court's express permission [42:15.940 --> 42:17.940] Well, I can always write [42:17.940 --> 42:19.940] In the national permission [42:19.940 --> 42:21.940] You can what? [42:21.940 --> 42:23.940] Well, I can always write [42:23.940 --> 42:25.940] In the national permission [42:25.940 --> 42:27.940] Ask for information [42:27.940 --> 42:29.940] In relation to what? [42:29.940 --> 42:31.940] To filing another lawsuit [42:35.940 --> 42:37.940] Okay [42:37.940 --> 42:39.940] Explain that to me [42:39.940 --> 42:41.940] What information [42:41.940 --> 42:43.940] Are you going to get from the federal courts [42:43.940 --> 42:45.940] To file a lawsuit in federal court [42:45.940 --> 42:47.940] In order to make your suit [42:47.940 --> 42:49.940] Worthy [42:49.940 --> 42:51.940] Of going to trial [42:55.940 --> 42:57.940] How does the federal court provide you [42:57.940 --> 42:59.940] With any of the necessary facts [42:59.940 --> 43:01.940] And causes of action [43:01.940 --> 43:03.940] That you have to have [43:03.940 --> 43:05.940] Written in your documentation [43:05.940 --> 43:07.940] And be able to prove that trial [43:07.940 --> 43:09.940] In order to prevail [43:09.940 --> 43:11.940] How is the federal court going to [43:11.940 --> 43:13.940] Provide you with any of that? [43:15.940 --> 43:17.940] Well, can I use [43:17.940 --> 43:19.940] Can I use the [43:19.940 --> 43:21.940] Constitution here [43:21.940 --> 43:23.940] The Pennsylvania Constitution [43:23.940 --> 43:25.940] Like they say, how laws are passed [43:25.940 --> 43:27.940] And that's it [43:27.940 --> 43:29.940] Or you'll have to add [43:29.940 --> 43:31.940] Something else to it [43:33.940 --> 43:35.940] Again [43:35.940 --> 43:37.940] I don't know what it is [43:37.940 --> 43:39.940] You're trying to argue with them [43:39.940 --> 43:41.940] About here as far as [43:41.940 --> 43:43.940] Your argument that the ordinance [43:43.940 --> 43:45.940] Was unconstitutional [43:45.940 --> 43:47.940] For whatever reason [43:47.940 --> 43:49.940] Hang on just a second. Let me take this break [43:49.940 --> 43:51.940] And let me try to clear this up real quick [43:51.940 --> 43:53.940] On the other side so I can get to these other collars [43:53.940 --> 43:55.940] Hang on, Jerry. All right, folks. [43:55.940 --> 43:57.940] Y'all hang on. We will be right back. [43:59.940 --> 44:01.940] Are you the plaintiff or defendant [44:01.940 --> 44:03.940] In a lawsuit? [44:03.940 --> 44:05.940] Win your case without an attorney [44:05.940 --> 44:07.940] With jurisdictionary [44:07.940 --> 44:09.940] The affordable, easy-to-understand [44:09.940 --> 44:11.940] Four CD course that will show you how [44:11.940 --> 44:13.940] In 24 hours [44:13.940 --> 44:15.940] By step [44:15.940 --> 44:17.940] If you have a lawyer [44:17.940 --> 44:19.940] Know what your lawyer should be doing [44:19.940 --> 44:21.940] If you don't have a lawyer [44:21.940 --> 44:23.940] Know what you should do for yourself [44:23.940 --> 44:25.940] Thousands have won with our [44:25.940 --> 44:27.940] Step-by-step course [44:27.940 --> 44:29.940] And now you can too [44:29.940 --> 44:31.940] Jurisdictionary was created [44:31.940 --> 44:33.940] By a licensed attorney [44:33.940 --> 44:35.940] With 22 years of case-winning experience [44:35.940 --> 44:37.940] Even if you're not in a lawsuit [44:37.940 --> 44:39.940] You can learn what everyone should [44:39.940 --> 44:41.940] Understand about the principles [44:41.940 --> 44:43.940] Of the law and courts [44:43.940 --> 44:45.940] You'll receive our audio classroom [44:45.940 --> 44:47.940] Video seminar, tutorials [44:47.940 --> 44:49.940] Forms for civil cases [44:49.940 --> 44:51.940] Procetactics and much more [44:51.940 --> 44:53.940] Please visit [44:53.940 --> 44:55.940] ruleoflawradio.com [44:55.940 --> 44:57.940] And click on the banner [44:57.940 --> 44:59.940] Or call toll-free [44:59.940 --> 45:01.940] 866-LAW-EZ [45:01.940 --> 45:03.940] I love logos. Without the shows on this network [45:03.940 --> 45:05.940] I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends [45:05.940 --> 45:07.940] I'm so addicted to the truth now [45:07.940 --> 45:09.940] That there's no going back [45:09.940 --> 45:11.940] I'd be lost without logos [45:11.940 --> 45:13.940] And I really want to help keep this network [45:13.940 --> 45:15.940] On the air. I'd love to volunteer as a show producer [45:15.940 --> 45:17.940] But I'm a bit of a Luddite [45:17.940 --> 45:19.940] And I really don't have any money to give [45:19.940 --> 45:21.940] Because I spent it all on supplements [45:21.940 --> 45:23.940] How can I help logos? [45:23.940 --> 45:25.940] Well, I'm glad you asked [45:25.940 --> 45:27.940] Whenever you order anything from Amazon [45:27.940 --> 45:29.940] You can help logos [45:29.940 --> 45:31.940] With ordering your supplies or holiday gifts [45:31.940 --> 45:33.940] First thing you do is clear your cookies [45:33.940 --> 45:35.940] Now go to www.LogosRadioNetwork.com [45:35.940 --> 45:37.940] Click on the Amazon logo [45:37.940 --> 45:39.940] And bookmark it [45:39.940 --> 45:41.940] Now, when you order anything from Amazon [45:41.940 --> 45:43.940] You use that link [45:43.940 --> 45:45.940] And logos get a few pesos [45:45.940 --> 45:47.940] Do I pay extra? No [45:47.940 --> 45:49.940] Do you have to do anything different when I order? [45:49.940 --> 45:51.940] No! Can I use my Amazon Prime? [45:51.940 --> 45:53.940] No! I mean, yes! [45:53.940 --> 45:55.940] Wow! Giving without doing anything [45:55.940 --> 45:57.940] Or spending any money [45:57.940 --> 45:59.940] This is perfect! Thank you so much! [45:59.940 --> 46:01.940] We are logos! [46:01.940 --> 46:11.940] Music [46:11.940 --> 46:21.940] Music [46:21.940 --> 46:29.940] Music [46:29.940 --> 46:39.940] Music [46:39.940 --> 46:49.940] Music [46:49.940 --> 46:57.940] Music [46:57.940 --> 47:03.940] Music [47:03.940 --> 47:05.940] Alright folks, we are back [47:05.940 --> 47:07.940] This is Rule of Law Radio [47:07.940 --> 47:11.940] The call in number 512-646-1984 [47:11.940 --> 47:13.940] If you want to call and get in line [47:13.940 --> 47:15.940] And carry out a discussion [47:15.940 --> 47:17.940] Or you have an issue to get [47:17.940 --> 47:19.940] Arranged one way or the other [47:19.940 --> 47:21.940] And figure it out, we'll see what we can do [47:21.940 --> 47:25.940] That said, let's see if we can wrap this up with Jerry [47:25.940 --> 47:27.940] Back to what we're talking about here [47:27.940 --> 47:29.940] Okay [47:29.940 --> 47:33.940] Appealing your conviction to federal court [47:33.940 --> 47:35.940] Is a different matter from suing the city attorney [47:35.940 --> 47:37.940] The city or anyone else [47:37.940 --> 47:39.940] Those are going to require two completely different [47:39.940 --> 47:41.940] Aspects of law and two completely different [47:41.940 --> 47:43.940] Processes to get done [47:43.940 --> 47:45.940] One is civil, one is whatever else [47:45.940 --> 47:47.940] Okay, it may be civil [47:47.940 --> 47:49.940] But it's a different kind of civil [47:49.940 --> 47:51.940] For a different reason and you can't mix the two [47:51.940 --> 47:53.940] Are we clear on this? [47:53.940 --> 47:55.940] Fine [47:55.940 --> 47:59.940] So, if you're going to go after the city attorney [47:59.940 --> 48:01.940] Then there are several things here that you must understand [48:01.940 --> 48:03.940] And you must go after as well [48:03.940 --> 48:07.940] One, was this a 100% pure city ordinance [48:07.940 --> 48:09.940] With no backing of state law? [48:09.940 --> 48:13.940] If the ordinance itself is based upon [48:13.940 --> 48:15.940] A legislatively enacted law [48:15.940 --> 48:19.940] Then they can enforce it [48:19.940 --> 48:21.940] All they did was implement it [48:21.940 --> 48:23.940] Local enforcement policy [48:23.940 --> 48:25.940] It's just like when states implement federal law [48:25.940 --> 48:27.940] At the state level [48:27.940 --> 48:29.940] Okay [48:29.940 --> 48:31.940] Same kind of process [48:31.940 --> 48:33.940] Now, the difference here [48:33.940 --> 48:37.940] One of the things in Texas is that the code of criminal [48:37.940 --> 48:39.940] Procedure specifically says [48:39.940 --> 48:43.940] That the complaint must state a violation [48:43.940 --> 48:47.940] Of some state law [48:47.940 --> 48:49.940] So here in Texas if they are citing [48:49.940 --> 48:51.940] Only an ordinance [48:51.940 --> 48:53.940] On the criminal complaint and information [48:53.940 --> 48:55.940] And no state law [48:55.940 --> 48:59.940] Then you have an issue of saying it's an invalid [48:59.940 --> 49:01.940] Complaint or invalid charging instrument [49:01.940 --> 49:03.940] Because it does not cite a state law [49:03.940 --> 49:07.940] I do not know if that will be the case in Pennsylvania [49:07.940 --> 49:09.940] But you are going to need to find out [49:09.940 --> 49:11.940] Okay [49:11.940 --> 49:13.940] The next thing you need to do [49:13.940 --> 49:17.940] Is study the judicial section of your state constitution [49:17.940 --> 49:21.940] To see who the constitution empowers [49:21.940 --> 49:23.940] And delegates authority to [49:23.940 --> 49:25.940] To prosecute in the name of the state [49:25.940 --> 49:29.940] In Texas that is only a county or district attorney [49:29.940 --> 49:31.940] The city attorney does not work for [49:31.940 --> 49:33.940] Or get paid by in any way [49:33.940 --> 49:37.940] The city or the [49:37.940 --> 49:39.940] District attorney or the county attorney's office [49:39.940 --> 49:41.940] Not in Texas they don't [49:41.940 --> 49:43.940] Okay [49:43.940 --> 49:45.940] So they are not a part of that office [49:45.940 --> 49:47.940] That powers delegated to them by that office [49:47.940 --> 49:50.940] And there is no rule of procedure [49:50.940 --> 49:53.940] Or law that can be enacted by the legislature [49:53.940 --> 49:55.940] That would give it to them [49:55.940 --> 49:57.940] Because it would directly violate [49:57.940 --> 49:59.940] The delegated powers clause [49:59.940 --> 50:01.940] Under the Texas constitution [50:01.940 --> 50:03.940] You need to find out if that's true in Pennsylvania [50:03.940 --> 50:05.940] Okay [50:05.940 --> 50:07.940] Now [50:07.940 --> 50:11.940] If it turns out that all of that is in your favor [50:11.940 --> 50:13.940] Then you may have a [50:13.940 --> 50:15.940] Pico suit against the city [50:15.940 --> 50:17.940] And its individual officers [50:17.940 --> 50:21.940] For authorizing a city attorney to do that [50:21.940 --> 50:23.940] Which he cannot constitutionally do [50:23.940 --> 50:25.940] Within the state of Pennsylvania [50:25.940 --> 50:27.940] You won't be able to go after the legislature [50:27.940 --> 50:31.940] But you can challenge anything the legislature wrote [50:31.940 --> 50:33.940] To give them that authority [50:33.940 --> 50:37.940] Like it is in 45.102 [50:37.940 --> 50:39.940] I think is what it is here in the Texas Code [50:39.940 --> 50:41.940] Of Criminal Procedure [50:41.940 --> 50:43.940] That an attorney shall prosecute all cases [50:43.940 --> 50:45.940] In municipal courts [50:45.940 --> 50:47.940] The problem there is is that they have [50:47.940 --> 50:49.940] No state prosecutorial power [50:49.940 --> 50:51.940] Granted to them by the state constitution [50:51.940 --> 50:53.940] And it is granted to other people [50:53.940 --> 50:55.940] Who cannot redelegate it [50:55.940 --> 50:57.940] So you need to verify that's how it works [50:57.940 --> 50:59.940] In Pennsylvania as well [50:59.940 --> 51:01.940] In order to make that challenge and make it stick [51:01.940 --> 51:03.940] Are we clear on this so far? [51:03.940 --> 51:05.940] Roger [51:05.940 --> 51:07.940] Okay [51:07.940 --> 51:09.940] So that means that you're going to have to do your research [51:09.940 --> 51:11.940] About all the case law you can [51:11.940 --> 51:13.940] About when a public official acts [51:13.940 --> 51:15.940] Without an authority they don't have [51:15.940 --> 51:17.940] Especially when it's a constitutional authority [51:17.940 --> 51:19.940] That they're acting with [51:19.940 --> 51:21.940] That was not given to them [51:21.940 --> 51:23.940] Alright [51:23.940 --> 51:25.940] And then any cases [51:25.940 --> 51:27.940] That established that any person harmed [51:27.940 --> 51:29.940] By such acts [51:29.940 --> 51:31.940] Has recourse against them for it [51:31.940 --> 51:33.940] Whether it be them as individuals [51:33.940 --> 51:35.940] Or the city for allowing them [51:35.940 --> 51:37.940] To get away with it [51:37.940 --> 51:39.940] Whatever political subdivision or state [51:39.940 --> 51:41.940] Office is acting in a manner [51:41.940 --> 51:43.940] They're not allowed to [51:43.940 --> 51:45.940] Alright [51:45.940 --> 51:47.940] So that's what you need to find [51:47.940 --> 51:49.940] That's what you need to research [51:49.940 --> 51:51.940] That's what you need to understand [51:51.940 --> 51:53.940] And what you need to argue and stick to [51:53.940 --> 51:55.940] Don't deviate from that [51:55.940 --> 51:57.940] Don't go chasing rabbits down rabbit holes [51:57.940 --> 51:59.940] Figure out your argument [51:59.940 --> 52:01.940] Stick with your argument [52:03.940 --> 52:05.940] Okay I think I got it [52:05.940 --> 52:07.940] You mentioned the RICO [52:07.940 --> 52:09.940] When can I file a RICO [52:09.940 --> 52:11.940] Against these people [52:11.940 --> 52:13.940] Well that would be a part of your original [52:13.940 --> 52:15.940] Lawsuit against them [52:15.940 --> 52:17.940] You would name them as in their official [52:17.940 --> 52:19.940] Capacities for establishing the RICO [52:19.940 --> 52:21.940] And in their individual capacities [52:21.940 --> 52:23.940] As liability for their acts under RICO [52:25.940 --> 52:27.940] Add all their names in there [52:27.940 --> 52:29.940] You would put the names of everybody [52:29.940 --> 52:31.940] You believe is involved [52:31.940 --> 52:33.940] Oh yeah [52:33.940 --> 52:35.940] That's 34-5 of them [52:35.940 --> 52:37.940] I guess I can use [52:37.940 --> 52:39.940] Okay [52:39.940 --> 52:41.940] That's what I'll do, I'll write it up that way [52:41.940 --> 52:43.940] And send it in [52:43.940 --> 52:45.940] Okay [52:45.940 --> 52:47.940] Alright [52:47.940 --> 52:49.940] Alright well good luck [52:49.940 --> 52:51.940] Alright folks [52:51.940 --> 52:53.940] Next one up in line [52:53.940 --> 52:55.940] Is Richard [52:55.940 --> 52:57.940] In Louisiana [52:57.940 --> 52:59.940] Richard what can we do for you [52:59.940 --> 53:01.940] Good evening [53:01.940 --> 53:03.940] We discussed the respondent special appearance [53:03.940 --> 53:05.940] And burdened or proofed demand letter [53:05.940 --> 53:07.940] Okay [53:07.940 --> 53:09.940] I was writing with a friend [53:09.940 --> 53:11.940] Yesterday [53:11.940 --> 53:13.940] And we passed one of those [53:13.940 --> 53:15.940] Little trucks that the [53:15.940 --> 53:17.940] Carish sits out on [53:17.940 --> 53:19.940] The road that monitors the speed [53:19.940 --> 53:21.940] And [53:21.940 --> 53:23.940] We really weren't paying attention [53:23.940 --> 53:25.940] We weren't speeding at any excessive rate [53:25.940 --> 53:27.940] But it's possible that [53:27.940 --> 53:29.940] They might have clipped her with that photo [53:29.940 --> 53:31.940] Just out of curiosity [53:31.940 --> 53:33.940] I had downloaded a copy [53:33.940 --> 53:35.940] Of the respondent special appearance [53:35.940 --> 53:37.940] Of the demand letter [53:37.940 --> 53:39.940] And wondering would that be [53:39.940 --> 53:41.940] When you say you downloaded this [53:41.940 --> 53:43.940] Where did you get this [53:43.940 --> 53:45.940] I believe it was from you [53:45.940 --> 53:47.940] Actually [53:47.940 --> 53:49.940] From me [53:49.940 --> 53:51.940] A source [53:51.940 --> 53:53.940] That you created [53:53.940 --> 53:55.940] Actually on this copy [53:55.940 --> 53:57.940] I don't see anything on the bottom [53:57.940 --> 53:59.940] Of the computer [53:59.940 --> 54:01.940] You say you downloaded it off of some internet site [54:01.940 --> 54:03.940] What was the site [54:03.940 --> 54:05.940] Yeah [54:05.940 --> 54:07.940] I can't [54:07.940 --> 54:09.940] I don't remember it off hand [54:09.940 --> 54:11.940] And it didn't print out of this [54:11.940 --> 54:13.940] Well it shouldn't print on the print out [54:13.940 --> 54:15.940] I wouldn't think [54:15.940 --> 54:17.940] Was it [54:17.940 --> 54:19.940] It's possible [54:19.940 --> 54:21.940] It is from the city [54:21.940 --> 54:23.940] It refers to the city of Austin [54:23.940 --> 54:25.940] And it was signed by [54:25.940 --> 54:27.940] That just means Randy could have done it too [54:27.940 --> 54:29.940] Was it juris imprudence [54:29.940 --> 54:31.940] Yes sir, Ernie [54:31.940 --> 54:33.940] Ernie, I really don't know [54:33.940 --> 54:35.940] It's [54:35.940 --> 54:37.940] Well the thing is that [54:37.940 --> 54:39.940] I don't recognize the letter you're talking about [54:39.940 --> 54:41.940] By the name you've given it [54:41.940 --> 54:43.940] That's why I don't know if I'm [54:43.940 --> 54:45.940] Going to be able to discuss this [54:45.940 --> 54:47.940] But let's give it a shot [54:47.940 --> 54:49.940] Okay and the reason [54:49.940 --> 54:51.940] Another reason why I thought it was you [54:51.940 --> 54:53.940] It references the city of Austin, Texas [54:53.940 --> 54:55.940] Well [54:55.940 --> 54:57.940] Randy was here in Austin too [54:57.940 --> 54:59.940] When he did a lot of these documents that he uses [54:59.940 --> 55:01.940] Okay [55:01.940 --> 55:03.940] It opens up with [55:03.940 --> 55:05.940] The red light camera agency's name [55:05.940 --> 55:07.940] You put your name [55:07.940 --> 55:09.940] Oh okay, so you downloaded the one [55:09.940 --> 55:11.940] That was off of [55:11.940 --> 55:13.940] The tile of law website [55:13.940 --> 55:15.940] In relation to red light cameras [55:15.940 --> 55:17.940] I believe that's [55:17.940 --> 55:19.940] Again I don't remember [55:19.940 --> 55:21.940] But I think you [55:21.940 --> 55:23.940] Okay, alright [55:23.940 --> 55:25.940] I think I know where you're coming [55:25.940 --> 55:27.940] From at least as far as that goes [55:27.940 --> 55:29.940] But now you said this was a speeding [55:29.940 --> 55:31.940] Camera right, not a red light camera [55:31.940 --> 55:33.940] Right, this was a speeding camera [55:33.940 --> 55:35.940] Okay [55:35.940 --> 55:37.940] I wonder if it's the same [55:37.940 --> 55:39.940] I imagine the issue is the same thing [55:39.940 --> 55:41.940] Potentially so yes [55:41.940 --> 55:43.940] If the camera [55:43.940 --> 55:45.940] Does not photograph the person [55:45.940 --> 55:47.940] Behind the wheel [55:47.940 --> 55:49.940] And what state was this in [55:49.940 --> 55:51.940] Louisiana [55:51.940 --> 55:53.940] Okay, and depending upon [55:53.940 --> 55:55.940] What the speeding [55:55.940 --> 55:57.940] Offense is and how it's worded [55:57.940 --> 55:59.940] In Louisiana, then yeah [55:59.940 --> 56:01.940] It may be an equally able [56:01.940 --> 56:03.940] Challenge [56:03.940 --> 56:05.940] Okay, and so this [56:05.940 --> 56:07.940] This respondents letter [56:07.940 --> 56:09.940] Would that be the first thing [56:09.940 --> 56:11.940] You'd want to respond to [56:11.940 --> 56:13.940] Well you have to remember, I don't know [56:13.940 --> 56:15.940] How Louisiana treats a speeding ticket [56:15.940 --> 56:17.940] Here in Texas red light camera tickets [56:17.940 --> 56:19.940] Were civil [56:19.940 --> 56:21.940] Okay, they were not criminal [56:21.940 --> 56:23.940] The problem is that they were also [56:23.940 --> 56:25.940] Illegal [56:25.940 --> 56:27.940] Because there was no authority [56:27.940 --> 56:29.940] In state law for any municipality [56:29.940 --> 56:31.940] To issue red light camera [56:31.940 --> 56:33.940] Citations and take money from people [56:33.940 --> 56:35.940] Never was [56:37.940 --> 56:39.940] So we're talking [56:39.940 --> 56:41.940] About two different things here [56:41.940 --> 56:43.940] Depending upon how Louisiana prosecutes [56:43.940 --> 56:45.940] Speeding versus red light cameras [56:45.940 --> 56:47.940] Yeah, I understand [56:47.940 --> 56:49.940] So I'm probably completing the two [56:49.940 --> 56:51.940] Yeah, you're not going to be able to use [56:51.940 --> 56:53.940] The same [56:53.940 --> 56:55.940] Type of demands and procedure [56:55.940 --> 56:57.940] In one as you would the other [56:57.940 --> 56:59.940] The civil side is different [56:59.940 --> 57:01.940] In that regard [57:01.940 --> 57:03.940] Even though it's a lot looser [57:03.940 --> 57:05.940] In the demand for proof, etc, etc [57:05.940 --> 57:07.940] They still have rules they've got to comply [57:07.940 --> 57:09.940] With, they're not as strict in many ways [57:09.940 --> 57:11.940] As they are when it comes to due process [57:11.940 --> 57:13.940] On the criminal side, but the fact remains [57:13.940 --> 57:15.940] That even on the criminal side [57:15.940 --> 57:17.940] If the photo does not show [57:17.940 --> 57:19.940] The person behind the wheel [57:19.940 --> 57:21.940] It just shows the car [57:21.940 --> 57:23.940] And no other way [57:23.940 --> 57:25.940] Can it identify who's at the wheel [57:25.940 --> 57:27.940] Then the issue itself [57:27.940 --> 57:29.940] Is a violation of due process [57:29.940 --> 57:31.940] Because they're charging [57:31.940 --> 57:33.940] The owner of the car [57:33.940 --> 57:35.940] Not who was behind the wheel [57:35.940 --> 57:37.940] And they're trying to do it [57:37.940 --> 57:39.940] In a criminal charge [57:39.940 --> 57:41.940] So that would be much harder [57:41.940 --> 57:43.940] For the state to get away with [57:43.940 --> 57:45.940] Legitimately [57:45.940 --> 57:47.940] And it could be easily challenged on those grounds [57:47.940 --> 57:49.940] Okay [57:49.940 --> 57:51.940] This apparently [57:51.940 --> 57:53.940] From what I remember [57:53.940 --> 57:55.940] It looks like it would probably get the picture [57:55.940 --> 57:57.940] Of the driver [57:57.940 --> 57:59.940] Well, you would want to see [57:59.940 --> 58:01.940] What evidence they have [58:01.940 --> 58:03.940] So the first thing you want to do [58:03.940 --> 58:05.940] Is file a motion for discovery [58:05.940 --> 58:07.940] Asking for whatever evidence they intend to introduce [58:07.940 --> 58:09.940] About who was driving the car [58:09.940 --> 58:11.940] And that's covered in this letter [58:11.940 --> 58:13.940] But they call it a request [58:13.940 --> 58:15.940] For an FOIA report [58:15.940 --> 58:17.940] Yeah, well, you're not going to do that [58:17.940 --> 58:19.940] You can't get discovery through FOIA [58:19.940 --> 58:21.940] In an actual case [58:21.940 --> 58:23.940] You have to file literal discovery [58:23.940 --> 58:25.940] So do that [58:25.940 --> 58:27.940] Okay, and it would be the regular things [58:27.940 --> 58:29.940] Who calibrated it [58:29.940 --> 58:31.940] Etc [58:31.940 --> 58:33.940] Well, you can ask for all that [58:33.940 --> 58:35.940] If you want to [58:35.940 --> 58:37.940] But it's going to be irrelevant [58:37.940 --> 58:39.940] At the same time, unless you know how to argue radar [58:39.940 --> 58:41.940] Okay [58:41.940 --> 58:43.940] All right, so hang on just a second, Lou [58:43.940 --> 58:45.940] Let me get this break down and we'll finish this up, okay? [58:45.940 --> 58:47.940] Okay, okay [58:47.940 --> 58:49.940] All right, folks, we'll be right back. Y'all hang on [58:49.940 --> 58:53.940] The Bible remains the most popular book in the world [58:53.940 --> 58:55.940] Yet countless readers are frustrated [58:55.940 --> 58:57.940] Because they struggle to understand it [58:57.940 --> 58:59.940] Some new translations try to help [58:59.940 --> 59:01.940] By simplifying the text [59:01.940 --> 59:03.940] But in the process can compromise [59:03.940 --> 59:05.940] The profound meaning of the Scripture [59:05.940 --> 59:08.940] Enter the recovery version [59:08.940 --> 59:10.940] First, this new translation [59:10.940 --> 59:12.940] Is extremely faithful and accurate [59:12.940 --> 59:14.940] But the real story is the more than [59:14.940 --> 59:17.940] 9,000 explanatory footnotes [59:17.940 --> 59:19.940] Difficult and profound passages [59:19.940 --> 59:21.940] Are opened up in a marvelous way [59:21.940 --> 59:24.940] Providing an entrance into the riches of the word [59:24.940 --> 59:27.940] Beyond which you've ever experienced before [59:27.940 --> 59:29.940] Bibles for America would like to give you [59:29.940 --> 59:32.940] A free recovery version simply for the asking [59:32.940 --> 59:35.940] This comprehensive yet compact study Bible [59:35.940 --> 59:38.940] Is yours just by calling us toll free [59:38.940 --> 59:43.940] At 1-888-551-0102 [59:43.940 --> 59:47.940] Or by ordering online at freestudybible.com [59:47.940 --> 59:50.940] That's freestudybible.com [59:50.940 --> 59:53.940] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network [59:53.940 --> 59:59.940] LogosRadioNetwork.com [59:59.940 --> 01:00:02.940] The following news flash is brought to you by [01:00:02.940 --> 01:00:05.940] The Lone Star Lowdown [01:00:05.940 --> 01:00:08.940] Markets for Monday the 22nd of July 2019 [01:00:08.940 --> 01:00:10.940] Open with precious metals [01:00:10.940 --> 01:00:12.940] Gold $1,429 an ounce [01:00:12.940 --> 01:00:14.940] Silver $16.45 an ounce [01:00:14.940 --> 01:00:16.940] Copper $2.75 an ounce [01:00:16.940 --> 01:00:19.940] Oil, Texas crude $55.63 a barrel [01:00:19.940 --> 01:00:22.940] Brent crude $62.47 a barrel [01:00:22.940 --> 01:00:24.940] And cryptos in order of market cap [01:00:24.940 --> 01:00:28.940] Bitcoin Core $10,566.52 [01:00:28.940 --> 01:00:31.940] Ethereum $227.26 [01:00:31.940 --> 01:00:33.940] XRP Ripple $0.33 [01:00:33.940 --> 01:00:36.940] Litecoin $100.31 [01:00:36.940 --> 01:00:39.940] And Bitcoin Cash is at $324.10 [01:00:39.940 --> 01:00:41.940] A crypto coin [01:00:45.940 --> 01:00:47.940] In history the year 1916 [01:00:47.940 --> 01:00:49.940] The preparedness day bombing [01:00:49.940 --> 01:00:52.940] A time suitcase bomb was detonated on Market Street [01:00:52.940 --> 01:00:54.940] In San Francisco during the World War I [01:00:54.940 --> 01:00:56.940] Preparedance Day Parade [01:00:56.940 --> 01:00:59.940] Killing 10 and entering 40 today in history [01:01:03.940 --> 01:01:04.940] And recent news [01:01:04.940 --> 01:01:07.940] Since Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 1325 [01:01:07.940 --> 01:01:10.940] Legalizing hemp into taxes law back in June [01:01:10.940 --> 01:01:14.940] County prosecutors around the state including Houston, Austin and San Antonio [01:01:14.940 --> 01:01:16.940] Have been dropping marijuana possession charges [01:01:16.940 --> 01:01:18.940] And even refusing to file new ones [01:01:18.940 --> 01:01:20.940] Since they are stipulating that they do not have the time [01:01:20.940 --> 01:01:23.940] Or the laboratory equipment to test the herb for THC [01:01:23.940 --> 01:01:26.940] Margaret Moore, the Travis County District Attorney [01:01:26.940 --> 01:01:29.940] Announced earlier this month that she was dismissing 32 felony possession [01:01:29.940 --> 01:01:32.940] And delivery of marijuana cases because of the law [01:01:32.940 --> 01:01:35.940] Mr. Abbott and other state officials including the Attorney General [01:01:35.940 --> 01:01:38.940] Stipulated in a letter that county district attorneys back on Thursday [01:01:38.940 --> 01:01:41.940] That marijuana has not been decriminalized in Texas [01:01:41.940 --> 01:01:44.940] And that these actions demonstrate a misunderstanding [01:01:44.940 --> 01:01:46.940] Of how HB 1325 works [01:01:46.940 --> 01:01:49.940] As well as other cities too like the District Attorney [01:01:49.940 --> 01:01:53.940] In El Paso, Cayma Esparza, a Democrat [01:01:53.940 --> 01:01:56.940] Who also stated earlier this month that the law [01:01:56.940 --> 01:02:00.940] Quote will not have an effect on the prosecution of marijuana cases in El Paso [01:02:00.940 --> 01:02:04.940] However, the issue was succinctly summarized by Mr. Brandon Ball [01:02:04.940 --> 01:02:07.940] An assistant public defender in Harris County who stated that quote [01:02:07.940 --> 01:02:10.940] The law is constantly changing on what makes something illegal [01:02:10.940 --> 01:02:12.940] Based on its chemical makeup [01:02:12.940 --> 01:02:14.940] It's important that if someone is charged with something [01:02:14.940 --> 01:02:21.940] The test matches what they're charged with [01:02:21.940 --> 01:02:23.940] A paper by Tulane University [01:02:23.940 --> 01:02:26.940] Identified a five and a half inch American pocket shark [01:02:26.940 --> 01:02:29.940] As the first of its kind in the Gulf of Mexico [01:02:29.940 --> 01:02:32.940] The specimen being only the second pocket shark ever captured [01:02:32.940 --> 01:02:36.940] Or recorded with the other one being found way back in 1979 [01:02:36.940 --> 01:02:38.940] In the East Pacific Ocean [01:02:38.940 --> 01:02:41.940] According to the university paper, the shark secretes a luminous fluid [01:02:41.940 --> 01:02:44.940] From a gland near its front fins [01:02:44.940 --> 01:02:48.940] For the purposes hypothesized to lure and prey [01:02:48.940 --> 01:02:50.940] Who may be drawn into the glow [01:02:50.940 --> 01:03:11.940] This is Ruff Rody with your lowdown for July 22nd, 2019 [01:03:20.940 --> 01:03:45.940] All right folks, we are back, this is Rule of Law Radio [01:03:45.940 --> 01:03:49.940] Calling number 512-646-1984 [01:03:49.940 --> 01:03:52.940] I called you Lou, I was looking at Louisiana on your thing here [01:03:52.940 --> 01:03:54.940] Was signing off there a minute ago [01:03:54.940 --> 01:03:58.940] But Richard, okay, so yeah [01:03:58.940 --> 01:04:02.940] I would take up that issue about whether or not you get discovery [01:04:02.940 --> 01:04:05.940] Get whatever photo evidence they're going to attempt to use [01:04:05.940 --> 01:04:07.940] And see whether or not it actually shows their face [01:04:07.940 --> 01:04:09.940] And then here's the thing [01:04:09.940 --> 01:04:12.940] If they don't supply one that shows the face [01:04:12.940 --> 01:04:15.940] And later try to produce one in court [01:04:15.940 --> 01:04:18.940] That does after you have filed discovery [01:04:18.940 --> 01:04:20.940] You can object and move to suppress [01:04:20.940 --> 01:04:22.940] It was not provided during discovery [01:04:22.940 --> 01:04:25.940] The state hid that information from the accused [01:04:25.940 --> 01:04:29.940] After a correct discovery was filed [01:04:29.940 --> 01:04:32.940] And get the case thrown out on a missed trial [01:04:32.940 --> 01:04:35.940] Great, gets great information [01:04:35.940 --> 01:04:38.940] Eddie, I want to just make a comment [01:04:38.940 --> 01:04:40.940] That first caller you got [01:04:40.940 --> 01:04:43.940] Let me suggest to him [01:04:43.940 --> 01:04:46.940] Just go ahead and send you the 59 bucks [01:04:46.940 --> 01:04:51.940] For the station and your use [01:04:51.940 --> 01:04:53.940] Rather than fly you out to some place [01:04:53.940 --> 01:04:55.940] Put the money to help you [01:04:55.940 --> 01:04:57.940] And also if you would [01:04:57.940 --> 01:05:01.940] Well, I had a problem trying to get some money to you [01:05:01.940 --> 01:05:04.940] And so there was an address issue [01:05:04.940 --> 01:05:08.940] Some of us don't have the electronic means to transfer [01:05:08.940 --> 01:05:12.940] The correct address to bail me, anything like that [01:05:12.940 --> 01:05:14.940] The only thing about it is [01:05:14.940 --> 01:05:17.940] That sending me has to have the name blank on it [01:05:17.940 --> 01:05:18.940] You can't put a name on it [01:05:18.940 --> 01:05:20.940] If you send like a money order or something [01:05:20.940 --> 01:05:23.940] And only money orders can be taken anyway [01:05:23.940 --> 01:05:26.940] Unless you're sending actual cash in the mail [01:05:26.940 --> 01:05:29.940] But if you send it, don't put a name on it [01:05:29.940 --> 01:05:31.940] Whatever it is [01:05:31.940 --> 01:05:32.940] And if you're sending cash [01:05:32.940 --> 01:05:34.940] Make sure you rep it and it's a tenfold [01:05:34.940 --> 01:05:36.940] But the mailing address is [01:05:36.940 --> 01:05:46.940] 16 South Lamar number 112 Austin 78704 [01:05:46.940 --> 01:05:47.940] Got it [01:05:47.940 --> 01:05:50.940] And I hope you got the little meager thing [01:05:50.940 --> 01:05:52.940] I sent you the other week too [01:05:52.940 --> 01:05:55.940] So thank you Eddie for all you do [01:05:55.940 --> 01:06:00.940] Your information is beyond the value of anything [01:06:00.940 --> 01:06:01.940] Gold or silver [01:06:01.940 --> 01:06:05.940] But you deserve the support [01:06:05.940 --> 01:06:07.940] Well I appreciate that, thank you [01:06:07.940 --> 01:06:08.940] Okay, good night [01:06:08.940 --> 01:06:10.940] Good night, thanks for calling [01:06:10.940 --> 01:06:13.940] Alright, next up is Ralph in Texas [01:06:13.940 --> 01:06:18.940] Ralph, what can we do for you? [01:06:18.940 --> 01:06:21.940] Hello Mr. Eddie, gladiator Craig [01:06:21.940 --> 01:06:22.940] Yes sir [01:06:22.940 --> 01:06:25.940] I could use a little bit of help [01:06:25.940 --> 01:06:26.940] Alright [01:06:26.940 --> 01:06:28.940] You've covered this subject pretty good [01:06:28.940 --> 01:06:31.940] But I'm a little bit thin on spreading myself out [01:06:31.940 --> 01:06:35.940] So I'm going to go ahead and ask it again [01:06:35.940 --> 01:06:38.940] I got some correspondence in the mail recently [01:06:38.940 --> 01:06:41.940] In fact I got it on the 17th [01:06:41.940 --> 01:06:45.940] The day is the 21st [01:06:45.940 --> 01:06:46.940] Yes, okay [01:06:46.940 --> 01:06:49.940] And this appears to be from a justice of the peace [01:06:49.940 --> 01:06:51.940] In Texas, okay [01:06:51.940 --> 01:06:54.940] In Buna, Jasper County [01:06:54.940 --> 01:06:57.940] But the envelope does not say for official business [01:06:57.940 --> 01:06:59.940] And it probably doesn't mean much [01:06:59.940 --> 01:07:01.940] But I was looking for that there [01:07:01.940 --> 01:07:03.940] What was inside [01:07:03.940 --> 01:07:05.940] This was made on October the 11th [01:07:05.940 --> 01:07:06.940] And I got it on the 17th [01:07:06.940 --> 01:07:10.940] It took six days because the Houston hub over there [01:07:10.940 --> 01:07:11.940] Is having problems [01:07:11.940 --> 01:07:13.940] I'm getting all of my mail really slowly [01:07:13.940 --> 01:07:19.940] So inside it says that I have a notice of pre-trial hearing [01:07:19.940 --> 01:07:26.940] And it's to be held at 9.30 a.m. on October 17th [01:07:26.940 --> 01:07:29.940] I got this at noon on October 17th [01:07:29.940 --> 01:07:32.940] What's the date of the letter itself? [01:07:32.940 --> 01:07:34.940] There is no date on the letter itself [01:07:34.940 --> 01:07:36.940] Which is another problem [01:07:36.940 --> 01:07:38.940] There's no signature at the bottom? [01:07:38.940 --> 01:07:40.940] And no date stamp? [01:07:40.940 --> 01:07:42.940] Correct [01:07:42.940 --> 01:07:44.940] Then you need to call that court [01:07:44.940 --> 01:07:47.940] Because almost certainly that's not valid [01:07:47.940 --> 01:07:48.940] Okay [01:07:48.940 --> 01:07:50.940] There's two films in it [01:07:50.940 --> 01:07:53.940] And the static text is against me [01:07:53.940 --> 01:07:57.940] Because I have a notice of pre-trial hearing [01:07:57.940 --> 01:07:59.940] It does not say what the hearing is concerning [01:07:59.940 --> 01:08:01.940] Which I thought it was supposed to do [01:08:01.940 --> 01:08:04.940] It says October 17th and I got it at noon [01:08:04.940 --> 01:08:07.940] And the other one says notice of pre-trial hearing [01:08:07.940 --> 01:08:08.940] Because there's two charges [01:08:08.940 --> 01:08:10.940] Well, the problem is anything these sins [01:08:10.940 --> 01:08:12.940] You can't give you less than 10 days [01:08:12.940 --> 01:08:14.940] If it wasn't mailed until the 11th [01:08:14.940 --> 01:08:16.940] And you can prove that by the envelope [01:08:16.940 --> 01:08:18.940] Which I hope you did not throw away [01:08:18.940 --> 01:08:20.940] No, I never throw away what it was [01:08:20.940 --> 01:08:21.940] Okay [01:08:21.940 --> 01:08:24.940] That's why we want to see what actual date [01:08:24.940 --> 01:08:26.940] Is on the letter inside the envelope [01:08:26.940 --> 01:08:29.940] To see how long they held it before they mailed it [01:08:29.940 --> 01:08:32.940] But if there's no signature and there's no date [01:08:32.940 --> 01:08:34.940] Something is up [01:08:34.940 --> 01:08:36.940] Because the court is required to stamp and sign [01:08:36.940 --> 01:08:38.940] Whatever it sends out [01:08:38.940 --> 01:08:40.940] Even if the court clerk is the one doing it [01:08:40.940 --> 01:08:43.940] Yeah, I expected like a cover letter [01:08:43.940 --> 01:08:45.940] For these two forms [01:08:45.940 --> 01:08:48.940] But the second form says I have notice of pre-trial hearing [01:08:48.940 --> 01:08:51.940] On October the 11th [01:08:53.940 --> 01:08:56.940] Well, it sounds like a scam might be an operation here [01:08:56.940 --> 01:08:59.940] They may be waiting for you to call [01:08:59.940 --> 01:09:01.940] If this is a scam [01:09:01.940 --> 01:09:04.940] So whatever you do, record the phone call [01:09:04.940 --> 01:09:06.940] Okay [01:09:06.940 --> 01:09:10.940] Did it supply you with a phone number by any chance? [01:09:10.940 --> 01:09:13.940] Uh, yes [01:09:13.940 --> 01:09:14.940] Uh-huh [01:09:14.940 --> 01:09:17.940] Okay, that kind of figures [01:09:17.940 --> 01:09:21.940] Look up using some actual phone book [01:09:21.940 --> 01:09:23.940] Or some Texas telephone directory [01:09:23.940 --> 01:09:26.940] Look up that specific JP's office [01:09:26.940 --> 01:09:29.940] And see if those phone numbers match [01:09:29.940 --> 01:09:31.940] Oh, I guess I will [01:09:31.940 --> 01:09:32.940] I may have misled you [01:09:32.940 --> 01:09:35.940] When I said I got this letter that appears to be [01:09:35.940 --> 01:09:39.940] No, I know I have charges at that court [01:09:39.940 --> 01:09:40.940] Okay [01:09:40.940 --> 01:09:43.940] But the reason I'm saying this appears to be [01:09:43.940 --> 01:09:45.940] Is because there's no signature [01:09:45.940 --> 01:09:47.940] No date, it's just two form letters [01:09:47.940 --> 01:09:48.940] Okay [01:09:48.940 --> 01:09:49.940] That's why I'm saying this [01:09:49.940 --> 01:09:51.940] It doesn't say business use [01:09:51.940 --> 01:09:52.940] And the two form letters [01:09:52.940 --> 01:09:53.940] Well, if you have charges [01:09:53.940 --> 01:09:55.940] Why are they sending you notices [01:09:55.940 --> 01:09:58.940] Way too late to do anything about? [01:09:58.940 --> 01:09:59.940] Well, that's just it [01:09:59.940 --> 01:10:00.940] I don't know [01:10:00.940 --> 01:10:01.940] Let me tell you a little bit more [01:10:01.940 --> 01:10:04.940] The notices are pretty much the same [01:10:04.940 --> 01:10:05.940] Except that [01:10:05.940 --> 01:10:08.940] Well, one says you had something to do on the 11th [01:10:08.940 --> 01:10:10.940] And the other one says you have to do it on the 17th [01:10:10.940 --> 01:10:11.940] It can't be both [01:10:11.940 --> 01:10:12.940] Right [01:10:12.940 --> 01:10:15.940] All right, let me back up [01:10:15.940 --> 01:10:16.940] I'm sorry if I'm confusing [01:10:16.940 --> 01:10:18.940] Failure to slow or move over [01:10:18.940 --> 01:10:21.940] For certain stationary vehicles [01:10:21.940 --> 01:10:25.940] Notice of hearing October 17th at 9.30 a.m. [01:10:25.940 --> 01:10:27.940] And that's one [01:10:27.940 --> 01:10:29.940] But the other one is [01:10:29.940 --> 01:10:32.940] No driver's license when unlicensed [01:10:32.940 --> 01:10:33.940] Not CDL [01:10:33.940 --> 01:10:35.940] Notice of pre-trial hearing [01:10:35.940 --> 01:10:38.940] October the 11th at 9.30 a.m. [01:10:38.940 --> 01:10:39.940] Now that's the top [01:10:39.940 --> 01:10:40.940] The top is a little bit different [01:10:40.940 --> 01:10:42.940] Of course, it's got the same style header on it [01:10:42.940 --> 01:10:44.940] The justice of the peace [01:10:44.940 --> 01:10:46.940] Then there's stars separating the top half [01:10:46.940 --> 01:10:47.940] And the bottom half [01:10:47.940 --> 01:10:49.940] And this is what's kind of interesting [01:10:49.940 --> 01:10:51.940] This is the bottom half [01:10:51.940 --> 01:10:53.940] Prosecutor has agreed to offer a plea bargain [01:10:53.940 --> 01:10:56.940] On your case in order to avoid coming to trial [01:10:56.940 --> 01:10:58.940] Only if you do not hold a CDL [01:10:58.940 --> 01:11:00.940] Please review the items below [01:11:00.940 --> 01:11:02.940] And if you would like to accept this offer [01:11:02.940 --> 01:11:05.940] You can select the box accepting [01:11:05.940 --> 01:11:07.940] Sign the bottom and return this form [01:11:07.940 --> 01:11:09.940] With the money order or cashier's check [01:11:09.940 --> 01:11:11.940] Or the amount indicated below [01:11:11.940 --> 01:11:14.940] Before the pre-trial date set above [01:11:14.940 --> 01:11:17.940] If we do not receive this notice [01:11:17.940 --> 01:11:19.940] Changing your plea [01:11:19.940 --> 01:11:22.940] It will be assumed that you still want your trial [01:11:22.940 --> 01:11:24.940] And will be expected to show up for court [01:11:24.940 --> 01:11:26.940] On the date specified above [01:11:26.940 --> 01:11:28.940] And it says I would [01:11:28.940 --> 01:11:29.940] And then there's the check box [01:11:29.940 --> 01:11:31.940] I would like to change my plea to guilty [01:11:31.940 --> 01:11:33.940] No contest or go on [01:11:33.940 --> 01:11:36.940] And accept deferred a judgment [01:11:36.940 --> 01:11:38.940] For $325.10 [01:11:38.940 --> 01:11:42.940] And be put on a 30-day deferred period [01:11:42.940 --> 01:11:44.940] And upon complying with the terms [01:11:44.940 --> 01:11:46.940] My case will be dismissed [01:11:46.940 --> 01:11:48.940] There's another sentence, same thing [01:11:48.940 --> 01:11:50.940] There are several problems here [01:11:50.940 --> 01:11:51.940] I never plead [01:11:51.940 --> 01:11:53.940] I've challenged jurisdiction [01:11:53.940 --> 01:11:56.940] And I've done judicial [01:11:56.940 --> 01:11:58.940] Let's see [01:11:58.940 --> 01:12:00.940] Conduct complaints on the judge [01:12:00.940 --> 01:12:03.940] We have done criminal charges on the judge [01:12:03.940 --> 01:12:05.940] Criminal charges on the officer [01:12:05.940 --> 01:12:09.940] They gave me citation, criminal charges [01:12:09.940 --> 01:12:12.940] On... [01:12:12.940 --> 01:12:16.940] Which might be why they don't want to prosecute you [01:12:16.940 --> 01:12:18.940] Well, but they look like they're setting it [01:12:18.940 --> 01:12:21.940] For a bench warrant [01:12:21.940 --> 01:12:23.940] And since I've got another... [01:12:23.940 --> 01:12:24.940] All you gotta do is appear [01:12:24.940 --> 01:12:28.940] And they can't issue the bench warrant [01:12:28.940 --> 01:12:30.940] Well, I'm kind of busy right now [01:12:30.940 --> 01:12:31.940] I thought about going over [01:12:31.940 --> 01:12:32.940] And seeing if they'll arrest me [01:12:32.940 --> 01:12:34.940] Well, I didn't say you had to go right now [01:12:34.940 --> 01:12:36.940] But as long as you're there on the date [01:12:36.940 --> 01:12:39.940] When you're supposed to be there [01:12:39.940 --> 01:12:41.940] Is my point [01:12:41.940 --> 01:12:42.940] Yeah, and I can't be there [01:12:42.940 --> 01:12:46.940] Because they sent me the information too late [01:12:46.940 --> 01:12:47.940] So I guess they did me a favor [01:12:47.940 --> 01:12:49.940] I don't think I would have wanted to go [01:12:49.940 --> 01:12:52.940] Because I'm very busy with another case [01:12:52.940 --> 01:12:54.940] Right, well, here's the thing [01:12:54.940 --> 01:12:55.940] This is what I was getting to [01:12:55.940 --> 01:12:56.940] If they sent you something [01:12:56.940 --> 01:12:58.940] That gave you less than 10 days notice [01:12:58.940 --> 01:13:00.940] To make an appearance in that court [01:13:00.940 --> 01:13:02.940] From the time it was actually mailed [01:13:02.940 --> 01:13:04.940] Which is why you need that envelope [01:13:04.940 --> 01:13:06.940] Then they screwed themselves [01:13:06.940 --> 01:13:08.940] And any action they take against you [01:13:08.940 --> 01:13:10.940] Is gonna bounce right back on them [01:13:10.940 --> 01:13:12.940] As long as you pursue it [01:13:12.940 --> 01:13:15.940] Which I highly suggest you do [01:13:15.940 --> 01:13:16.940] Okay [01:13:16.940 --> 01:13:17.940] But in any case [01:13:17.940 --> 01:13:19.940] You need to put that court on written notice [01:13:19.940 --> 01:13:21.940] And make sure you send scan copies [01:13:21.940 --> 01:13:23.940] Of the envelope [01:13:23.940 --> 01:13:25.940] At least the postmark on the envelope [01:13:25.940 --> 01:13:26.940] Preferably the whole envelope [01:13:26.940 --> 01:13:27.940] So they can make sure [01:13:27.940 --> 01:13:29.940] It's the same one they sent you [01:13:29.940 --> 01:13:30.940] And a copy of the... [01:13:30.940 --> 01:13:31.940] At least the paragraph saying [01:13:31.940 --> 01:13:34.940] That you had to appear on such and such dates [01:13:34.940 --> 01:13:36.940] How could you be commanded to appear on the 11th [01:13:36.940 --> 01:13:38.940] When they only mailed it on the 11th [01:13:38.940 --> 01:13:39.940] How could you appear... [01:13:39.940 --> 01:13:41.940] Commanded to be appear on the 17th [01:13:41.940 --> 01:13:43.940] When they only mailed it on the 11th [01:13:43.940 --> 01:13:46.940] They cannot give you less than 10 days notice [01:13:46.940 --> 01:13:48.940] In anything they send you [01:13:48.940 --> 01:13:51.940] And all of that falls well under 10 days [01:13:51.940 --> 01:13:53.940] In fact, one is completely impossible [01:13:53.940 --> 01:13:54.940] We mailed it today [01:13:54.940 --> 01:13:56.940] But you need to appear today [01:13:56.940 --> 01:13:57.940] At 9 a.m. [01:13:57.940 --> 01:13:59.940] And we didn't mail it till noon [01:13:59.940 --> 01:14:01.940] The certifiers I've been getting [01:14:01.940 --> 01:14:03.940] Have all been taking extra long too [01:14:03.940 --> 01:14:04.940] That's what I'm saying [01:14:04.940 --> 01:14:05.940] Everything I used to get 3 [01:14:05.940 --> 01:14:07.940] Well, but even if they're certified [01:14:07.940 --> 01:14:10.940] At least you've got proof of when you actually received it [01:14:10.940 --> 01:14:12.940] In this case, you don't have proof [01:14:12.940 --> 01:14:13.940] When you actually got it [01:14:13.940 --> 01:14:15.940] So we have to use the proof available [01:14:15.940 --> 01:14:18.940] To prove that the time frame they were supposed to give you [01:14:18.940 --> 01:14:20.940] Was not complied with [01:14:20.940 --> 01:14:23.940] Well, they can't prove that I got it at all, period [01:14:23.940 --> 01:14:25.940] Unless they're listening to me [01:14:25.940 --> 01:14:26.940] And then they know I got it too late [01:14:26.940 --> 01:14:28.940] To do anything about it [01:14:28.940 --> 01:14:31.940] Well, again, you're right [01:14:31.940 --> 01:14:34.940] But unfortunately, the law is written [01:14:34.940 --> 01:14:36.940] To protect them in that regard, not you [01:14:36.940 --> 01:14:39.940] As long as you challenge it, fine [01:14:39.940 --> 01:14:41.940] But until you do challenge it [01:14:41.940 --> 01:14:45.940] They can use the dates against you [01:14:45.940 --> 01:14:46.940] Okay? [01:14:46.940 --> 01:14:48.940] Well, let me ask you a couple more questions [01:14:48.940 --> 01:14:50.940] If you have the time [01:14:50.940 --> 01:14:53.940] One is [01:14:53.940 --> 01:14:55.940] If they give me a date [01:14:55.940 --> 01:14:57.940] And I can't meet it [01:14:57.940 --> 01:14:59.940] You know, I have other things going on [01:14:59.940 --> 01:15:01.940] I could probably ask for a continuance [01:15:01.940 --> 01:15:03.940] But don't I give into their jurisdiction [01:15:03.940 --> 01:15:07.940] If I ask for a continuance? [01:15:07.940 --> 01:15:08.940] How would you... [01:15:08.940 --> 01:15:11.940] You're not addressing the specific facts of the case [01:15:11.940 --> 01:15:13.940] At all [01:15:13.940 --> 01:15:16.940] You're simply asking for a different date and time [01:15:16.940 --> 01:15:17.940] In which to do so [01:15:17.940 --> 01:15:20.940] How does that establish jurisdiction? [01:15:20.940 --> 01:15:22.940] Well, you had said something [01:15:22.940 --> 01:15:25.940] And I just wish I was being overly cautious [01:15:25.940 --> 01:15:27.940] Okay, yeah, if... [01:15:27.940 --> 01:15:29.940] Because I did that once before [01:15:29.940 --> 01:15:30.940] And you got on to me about it, you know [01:15:30.940 --> 01:15:32.940] Because I asked for a continuance [01:15:32.940 --> 01:15:34.940] But right now, all I have there is... [01:15:34.940 --> 01:15:36.940] Well, on the thing of that [01:15:36.940 --> 01:15:37.940] Just so we're sure here [01:15:37.940 --> 01:15:39.940] On the thing of me getting on to you [01:15:39.940 --> 01:15:41.940] For asking for a continuance [01:15:41.940 --> 01:15:42.940] What were the other... [01:15:42.940 --> 01:15:44.940] There must have been other circumstances [01:15:44.940 --> 01:15:46.940] About why asking for a continuance [01:15:46.940 --> 01:15:49.940] Was not the proper thing to do [01:15:49.940 --> 01:15:50.940] Okay? [01:15:50.940 --> 01:15:51.940] In this particular case [01:15:51.940 --> 01:15:53.940] You've got documentation from the court [01:15:53.940 --> 01:15:55.940] That you have to appear on a certain date and time [01:15:55.940 --> 01:15:57.940] Thus, the only way you can change [01:15:57.940 --> 01:15:59.940] That date and time in Texas [01:15:59.940 --> 01:16:01.940] Is by the filing of a continuance [01:16:01.940 --> 01:16:03.940] As long as you do not address [01:16:03.940 --> 01:16:05.940] The merits of any of the charges [01:16:05.940 --> 01:16:06.940] Or the facts of the case [01:16:06.940 --> 01:16:08.940] You have not established jurisdiction [01:16:08.940 --> 01:16:10.940] By asking for a continuance [01:16:10.940 --> 01:16:12.940] Okay, so... [01:16:12.940 --> 01:16:14.940] And it won't destroy my speedy trial? [01:16:14.940 --> 01:16:16.940] My right to speedy trial [01:16:16.940 --> 01:16:17.940] If I ask for a continuance [01:16:17.940 --> 01:16:19.940] That's what it messes up [01:16:19.940 --> 01:16:21.940] Is the speedy trial clock stops [01:16:21.940 --> 01:16:23.940] For any period that you have [01:16:23.940 --> 01:16:25.940] Asked for a continuance [01:16:25.940 --> 01:16:26.940] Okay? [01:16:26.940 --> 01:16:28.940] But once you make the appearance [01:16:28.940 --> 01:16:30.940] On whatever date is set [01:16:30.940 --> 01:16:33.940] The speedy trial clock starts again [01:16:35.940 --> 01:16:36.940] Okay? [01:16:36.940 --> 01:16:38.940] But now, if I got on to you [01:16:38.940 --> 01:16:39.940] For filing a continuance [01:16:39.940 --> 01:16:41.940] Then how many did you file [01:16:41.940 --> 01:16:43.940] In another case? [01:16:43.940 --> 01:16:44.940] That was in 2014 [01:16:44.940 --> 01:16:45.940] I could hardly remember that [01:16:45.940 --> 01:16:46.940] Okay, well, either way [01:16:46.940 --> 01:16:48.940] Let's finish this up on the other side [01:16:48.940 --> 01:16:51.940] When I get back from this break, okay? [01:16:51.940 --> 01:16:52.940] Yes. [01:16:52.940 --> 01:16:53.940] All right, folks, y'all hang on [01:16:53.940 --> 01:16:55.940] And we will be right back. [01:17:03.940 --> 01:17:05.940] It's the 2019 Logos Radio Network [01:17:05.940 --> 01:17:07.940] Annual fundraiser and gun giveaway [01:17:07.940 --> 01:17:09.940] Sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works [01:17:09.940 --> 01:17:12.940] Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com [01:17:12.940 --> 01:17:13.940] And enter to win [01:17:13.940 --> 01:17:15.940] Any amount is appreciated [01:17:15.940 --> 01:17:17.940] Everything helps to keep us on the air [01:17:17.940 --> 01:17:19.940] From Central Texas Gun Works [01:17:19.940 --> 01:17:21.940] The grand prize up for grabs [01:17:21.940 --> 01:17:23.940] Is the Spikes Tactical AR-15 [01:17:23.940 --> 01:17:26.940] More prizes and sponsors to be announced [01:17:26.940 --> 01:17:29.940] Every $25 donation is a chance to win [01:17:29.940 --> 01:17:31.940] When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book [01:17:31.940 --> 01:17:33.940] Legal 101 [01:17:33.940 --> 01:17:35.940] You get four chances to win [01:17:35.940 --> 01:17:37.940] Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar [01:17:37.940 --> 01:17:39.940] And get 10 chances to win [01:17:39.940 --> 01:17:40.940] If you've enjoyed the shows [01:17:40.940 --> 01:17:42.940] On Logos Radio Network [01:17:42.940 --> 01:17:43.940] Support our fundraiser [01:17:43.940 --> 01:17:44.940] So we can keep bringing you [01:17:44.940 --> 01:17:47.940] The best quality programming on talk radio today [01:17:47.940 --> 01:17:50.940] We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies [01:17:50.940 --> 01:17:53.940] And remember, every $25 donation [01:17:53.940 --> 01:17:54.940] Is a chance to win [01:17:54.940 --> 01:17:56.940] Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com [01:17:56.940 --> 01:17:59.940] For details and donate today [01:17:59.940 --> 01:18:01.940] Are you being harassed by debt collectors [01:18:01.940 --> 01:18:04.940] With phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:18:04.940 --> 01:18:06.940] Stop debt collectors now [01:18:06.940 --> 01:18:08.940] With the Michael Mirris Proven Method [01:18:08.940 --> 01:18:10.940] Michael Mirris has won six cases [01:18:10.940 --> 01:18:12.940] In federal court against debt collectors [01:18:12.940 --> 01:18:14.940] And now you can win two [01:18:14.940 --> 01:18:16.940] You'll get step-by-step instructions [01:18:16.940 --> 01:18:18.940] In plain English on how to win in court [01:18:18.940 --> 01:18:20.940] Using federal civil rights statutes [01:18:20.940 --> 01:18:22.940] What to do when contacted by [01:18:22.940 --> 01:18:24.940] Phone, mail, or court summons [01:18:24.940 --> 01:18:26.940] How to answer letters and phone calls [01:18:26.940 --> 01:18:28.940] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report [01:18:28.940 --> 01:18:30.940] How to turn the financial tables on them [01:18:30.940 --> 01:18:33.940] And make them pay you to go away [01:18:33.940 --> 01:18:35.940] The Michael Mirris Proven Method [01:18:35.940 --> 01:18:38.940] Is the solution for how to stop debt collectors [01:18:38.940 --> 01:18:40.940] Personal consultation is available as well [01:18:40.940 --> 01:18:42.940] For more information, please visit [01:18:42.940 --> 01:18:44.940] RuleofLawRadio.com [01:18:44.940 --> 01:18:46.940] And click on the blue Michael Mirris banner [01:18:46.940 --> 01:18:49.940] Or email Michaelmirris at yahoo.com [01:18:49.940 --> 01:18:51.940] That's RuleofLawRadio.com [01:18:51.940 --> 01:18:55.940] Or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S [01:18:55.940 --> 01:18:57.940] At yahoo.com [01:18:57.940 --> 01:19:11.940] To learn how to stop debt collectors now [01:19:27.940 --> 01:19:39.940] Hi folks, we are back [01:19:39.940 --> 01:19:41.940] This is RuleofLawRadio [01:19:41.940 --> 01:19:45.940] We've got three more segments of the show here [01:19:45.940 --> 01:19:48.940] And we are talking to Ralph in Texas [01:19:48.940 --> 01:19:50.940] Alright Ralph, go ahead [01:19:50.940 --> 01:19:53.940] Okay, a couple of things about this form letter [01:19:53.940 --> 01:19:58.940] It bothers me as it says on Rule 131-2019 [01:19:58.940 --> 01:20:00.940] You were cited in the above numbered calls [01:20:00.940 --> 01:20:02.940] And requested to trial by judge or jury [01:20:02.940 --> 01:20:04.940] This is your notice, okay [01:20:04.940 --> 01:20:08.940] First of all, I am not familiar with any docket number [01:20:08.940 --> 01:20:09.940] I haven't had a docket number [01:20:09.940 --> 01:20:11.940] This is the first I've heard of a docket number [01:20:11.940 --> 01:20:15.940] Second of all, I've never requested a trial by judge or jury [01:20:15.940 --> 01:20:17.940] Because I have got a motion to quash [01:20:17.940 --> 01:20:19.940] And challenged the subject matter jurisdiction [01:20:19.940 --> 01:20:22.940] It filed on that citation [01:20:22.940 --> 01:20:24.940] But it never had a docket number [01:20:24.940 --> 01:20:27.940] The other thing is the last time I was there [01:20:27.940 --> 01:20:34.940] At that court was to hand the KP criminal charges [01:20:34.940 --> 01:20:38.940] Against two different chair departments [01:20:38.940 --> 01:20:40.940] Two different police departments [01:20:40.940 --> 01:20:43.940] Who are not answering my public information request [01:20:43.940 --> 01:20:46.940] And I asked before leaving [01:20:46.940 --> 01:20:48.940] I asked to look at my case file [01:20:48.940 --> 01:20:51.940] And the JP told me, well your case file is not here [01:20:51.940 --> 01:20:54.940] It's been taken to the district attorney [01:20:54.940 --> 01:20:56.940] So I went to the district attorney's office [01:20:56.940 --> 01:21:01.940] And they handed me a copy of one of the citations [01:21:01.940 --> 01:21:04.940] And I said, well I want to see my case file [01:21:04.940 --> 01:21:06.940] And they said, well you need to go to the JP [01:21:06.940 --> 01:21:08.940] And I said, JP said it was here [01:21:08.940 --> 01:21:10.940] And they said, oh no, your case file is not here [01:21:10.940 --> 01:21:14.940] So then I did a bar agreement against the prosecutor [01:21:14.940 --> 01:21:17.940] So that's the last I've known of it [01:21:17.940 --> 01:21:19.940] Here they are, they're giving me this [01:21:19.940 --> 01:21:21.940] I request a judge and jury trial [01:21:21.940 --> 01:21:22.940] Okay, well here's the thing [01:21:22.940 --> 01:21:25.940] If there are false statements about the status of your case [01:21:25.940 --> 01:21:29.940] In that email or that letter you got from them [01:21:29.940 --> 01:21:31.940] You need to write a written objection [01:21:31.940 --> 01:21:34.940] Challenging each one of them [01:21:34.940 --> 01:21:39.940] And file that in your court case [01:21:39.940 --> 01:21:41.940] Okay [01:21:41.940 --> 01:21:44.940] So write a written objection [01:21:44.940 --> 01:21:47.940] And you can do it in one single documented objection [01:21:47.940 --> 01:21:49.940] Just say objection number one [01:21:49.940 --> 01:21:51.940] Site the paragraph or sentence in the letter [01:21:51.940 --> 01:21:53.940] Where it's stating false information [01:21:53.940 --> 01:21:55.940] And challenge it directly [01:21:55.940 --> 01:21:56.940] And then objection two [01:21:56.940 --> 01:21:59.940] And repeat that process all the way through the letter [01:21:59.940 --> 01:22:00.940] Okay [01:22:00.940 --> 01:22:06.940] Now this is why that letter is not signed [01:22:06.940 --> 01:22:07.940] Okay [01:22:07.940 --> 01:22:08.940] Dollars to donuts [01:22:08.940 --> 01:22:10.940] That's why it's not signed [01:22:10.940 --> 01:22:12.940] Oh yes, okay, that's why it's not signed [01:22:12.940 --> 01:22:14.940] Well this is really a form [01:22:14.940 --> 01:22:15.940] It's not even a letter [01:22:15.940 --> 01:22:17.940] For signature is my signature [01:22:17.940 --> 01:22:19.940] Or actually defendant's signature [01:22:19.940 --> 01:22:21.940] And since I'm not a defendant [01:22:21.940 --> 01:22:23.940] Like I said, I, you know [01:22:23.940 --> 01:22:27.940] Okay, all right [01:22:27.940 --> 01:22:29.940] All right, I'm going to go back [01:22:29.940 --> 01:22:31.940] For that first thing you told me to do about the dates [01:22:31.940 --> 01:22:33.940] But I have a question here [01:22:33.940 --> 01:22:35.940] You want to object to the dates [01:22:35.940 --> 01:22:37.940] That they did not give you time to respond [01:22:37.940 --> 01:22:41.940] And that the dates provided were impossible [01:22:41.940 --> 01:22:44.940] Okay, yes, yes, yes [01:22:44.940 --> 01:22:46.940] I remember now because they have to give you 10 days notice [01:22:46.940 --> 01:22:49.940] And even if the mail was being delivered on time [01:22:49.940 --> 01:22:52.940] It never would have made them give you 10 days notice [01:22:52.940 --> 01:22:53.940] All right, I'm looking at something [01:22:53.940 --> 01:22:54.940] I'm kind of hung up on this [01:22:54.940 --> 01:22:56.940] And I'm not sure if this is the right one or not [01:22:56.940 --> 01:22:57.940] Because I just started looking for it [01:22:57.940 --> 01:23:00.940] Before your show came on today [01:23:00.940 --> 01:23:01.940] Code terminal procedure chapter two [01:23:01.940 --> 01:23:04.940] General duties officers article 2.01 [01:23:04.940 --> 01:23:06.940] Duties of district attorneys [01:23:06.940 --> 01:23:08.940] It says, I think this is the one that says [01:23:08.940 --> 01:23:13.940] If the district attorney sees an officer doing something wrong [01:23:13.940 --> 01:23:14.940] Okay [01:23:14.940 --> 01:23:17.940] That's 2.03 [01:23:17.940 --> 01:23:19.940] What, 2.03 or [01:23:19.940 --> 01:23:21.940] Yeah, I think it's 2.03 that you're talking about [01:23:21.940 --> 01:23:23.940] When you say when he sees another officer doing something [01:23:23.940 --> 01:23:25.940] Incorrect [01:23:25.940 --> 01:23:27.940] Or in violation of law [01:23:27.940 --> 01:23:29.940] Okay, well [01:23:29.940 --> 01:23:30.940] That's the duty, that's it, okay [01:23:30.940 --> 01:23:32.940] Yeah, okay, you're right [01:23:32.940 --> 01:23:35.940] I read both of them and I was like, okay [01:23:35.940 --> 01:23:37.940] Can I use that against a prosecutor [01:23:37.940 --> 01:23:39.940] For not telling the judge, hey, judge [01:23:39.940 --> 01:23:41.940] You can't send somebody a notice to be at [01:23:41.940 --> 01:23:44.940] Pre-trial on the same day he's supposed to be there [01:23:44.940 --> 01:23:48.940] Well, do you know that the prosecutor has a copy of that letter? [01:23:48.940 --> 01:23:50.940] Well, it says that the prosecutor has agreed to that [01:23:50.940 --> 01:23:52.940] That's not my question [01:23:52.940 --> 01:23:55.940] Do you know that the prosecutor has a copy of that letter [01:23:55.940 --> 01:24:00.940] Or has seen that letter? [01:24:00.940 --> 01:24:02.940] Do I know that? No [01:24:02.940 --> 01:24:03.940] Okay, then you would be making an allegation [01:24:03.940 --> 01:24:08.940] Of all the facts, just like what they're doing, right? [01:24:08.940 --> 01:24:10.940] Hmm [01:24:10.940 --> 01:24:12.940] Interesting point of view, okay [01:24:12.940 --> 01:24:15.940] Not the point of view I had, but I'll entertain the idea [01:24:15.940 --> 01:24:17.940] It sounds pretty good, okay [01:24:17.940 --> 01:24:19.940] Well, if you can't back it up with factual evidence [01:24:19.940 --> 01:24:22.940] That the prosecutor has seen this email and knows it was [01:24:22.940 --> 01:24:25.940] Mailed to you with an illegal demand [01:24:25.940 --> 01:24:28.940] How are you going to tell him or blame him [01:24:28.940 --> 01:24:30.940] For what the judge did? [01:24:30.940 --> 01:24:32.940] Okay, no, you're right [01:24:32.940 --> 01:24:35.940] I just was getting a little overly eager [01:24:35.940 --> 01:24:37.940] And that kind of cooled me off [01:24:37.940 --> 01:24:39.940] Okay, yeah, I do have some issues [01:24:39.940 --> 01:24:41.940] But that's not one of them [01:24:41.940 --> 01:24:43.940] Okay, I think that will do me, sir [01:24:43.940 --> 01:24:44.940] I appreciate it [01:24:44.940 --> 01:24:46.940] I looked out in my backyard the other day [01:24:46.940 --> 01:24:47.940] I don't remember what it was [01:24:47.940 --> 01:24:49.940] And my money tree [01:24:49.940 --> 01:24:52.940] It's got an 80 credit branch on it [01:24:52.940 --> 01:24:54.940] And dug on the whole tree [01:24:54.940 --> 01:24:56.940] It's kind of wilting [01:24:56.940 --> 01:24:58.940] I guess I'm going to put some water on it, huh? [01:24:58.940 --> 01:25:01.940] Do you like some water or do you like some cash? [01:25:01.940 --> 01:25:07.940] Well, if the water is liquid gold, I'll take it [01:25:07.940 --> 01:25:09.940] You helped me a lot back in 2014 [01:25:09.940 --> 01:25:10.940] When all this got started [01:25:10.940 --> 01:25:12.940] I called you on the phone several times [01:25:12.940 --> 01:25:14.940] And I think I sent you some money [01:25:14.940 --> 01:25:15.940] But that was a long time ago [01:25:15.940 --> 01:25:17.940] And you helped me and never asked for anything [01:25:17.940 --> 01:25:21.940] It had been nice if I had kind of like the idea of what to spend [01:25:21.940 --> 01:25:23.940] Well, that's the other thing [01:25:23.940 --> 01:25:26.940] I don't try to set price tags on what I do [01:25:26.940 --> 01:25:30.940] If people appreciate what I do enough to value it [01:25:30.940 --> 01:25:33.940] Then I let them determine how valuable it was to them [01:25:33.940 --> 01:25:35.940] I try to be fair about that [01:25:35.940 --> 01:25:37.940] Now, if I was actually running a business [01:25:37.940 --> 01:25:39.940] Where I'm providing like computer services or something [01:25:39.940 --> 01:25:40.940] Then I've got a rate for that [01:25:40.940 --> 01:25:42.940] But I don't have a rate for this [01:25:42.940 --> 01:25:44.940] Right, right, right [01:25:44.940 --> 01:25:46.940] And I understand that [01:25:46.940 --> 01:25:49.940] The problem with me was back then [01:25:49.940 --> 01:25:51.940] I didn't have any money at all [01:25:51.940 --> 01:25:52.940] Now I'm retired [01:25:52.940 --> 01:25:53.940] And I got a little bit of money coming in [01:25:53.940 --> 01:25:55.940] Not much, but a little bit [01:25:55.940 --> 01:25:58.940] And most of us are going to this lawsuit I'm on [01:25:58.940 --> 01:26:01.940] But anyway, I do appreciate what you've done [01:26:01.940 --> 01:26:03.940] I've tried to make it up a little bit as I go [01:26:03.940 --> 01:26:05.940] I do appreciate it [01:26:05.940 --> 01:26:09.940] And I think I sent you a copy of my dismissal letter [01:26:09.940 --> 01:26:11.940] Or dismissal order [01:26:11.940 --> 01:26:18.940] I think it was signed in July of 2015 [01:26:18.940 --> 01:26:19.940] But I can send you another one [01:26:19.940 --> 01:26:21.940] You said you were collecting those, right? [01:26:21.940 --> 01:26:23.940] Yeah, I'm trying to get an email [01:26:23.940 --> 01:26:25.940] Stating what kind of case it was [01:26:25.940 --> 01:26:26.940] That you won the case [01:26:26.940 --> 01:26:27.940] It was dismissed [01:26:27.940 --> 01:26:29.940] Or you were acquitted or whatever [01:26:29.940 --> 01:26:31.940] A copy of the order proving that that was the case [01:26:31.940 --> 01:26:35.940] And permission to put it up on the legal blog [01:26:35.940 --> 01:26:36.940] Okay [01:26:36.940 --> 01:26:38.940] Well, I might not do it in the next thing or two [01:26:38.940 --> 01:26:40.940] But like I said, I think I sent you one [01:26:40.940 --> 01:26:43.940] But at this time I'll send it with an explanation letter [01:26:43.940 --> 01:26:45.940] And a copy of the actual order [01:26:45.940 --> 01:26:48.940] And I'll let you get on to the other callers [01:26:48.940 --> 01:26:49.940] And I appreciate it [01:26:49.940 --> 01:26:50.940] Okay, Eddie? [01:26:50.940 --> 01:26:52.940] Yes, sir, thank you [01:26:52.940 --> 01:26:55.940] Alright, next up is... [01:26:55.940 --> 01:26:57.940] Let's see... [01:26:57.940 --> 01:26:58.940] Khalid in Maryland [01:26:58.940 --> 01:27:01.940] Khalid, what can we do for you? [01:27:01.940 --> 01:27:03.940] Hey, hold on, you want a second? [01:27:03.940 --> 01:27:08.940] Alright [01:27:08.940 --> 01:27:09.940] What's going on? [01:27:09.940 --> 01:27:11.940] I called last week [01:27:11.940 --> 01:27:13.940] And I called last week [01:27:13.940 --> 01:27:14.940] I'm running this time [01:27:14.940 --> 01:27:15.940] Like I'm running the end of the show [01:27:15.940 --> 01:27:16.940] Right [01:27:16.940 --> 01:27:18.940] You asked me to call back early in the show [01:27:18.940 --> 01:27:19.940] We was... [01:27:19.940 --> 01:27:21.940] I was talking about [01:27:21.940 --> 01:27:23.940] The whole thing with what you were saying [01:27:23.940 --> 01:27:25.940] And I brought up... [01:27:25.940 --> 01:27:27.940] In my case, I had brought up 49 [01:27:27.940 --> 01:27:29.940] 1331301 [01:27:29.940 --> 01:27:32.940] As far as [01:27:32.940 --> 01:27:35.940] Federal definition of [01:27:35.940 --> 01:27:37.940] Trade, traffic and transportation [01:27:37.940 --> 01:27:38.940] And you were speaking on that shortly [01:27:38.940 --> 01:27:39.940] And you said you wanted to [01:27:39.940 --> 01:27:40.940] Yeah [01:27:40.940 --> 01:27:41.940] Pound on it some more today [01:27:41.940 --> 01:27:42.940] Okay [01:27:42.940 --> 01:27:44.940] Well, the issue there is [01:27:44.940 --> 01:27:46.940] Very straightforward and very simple [01:27:46.940 --> 01:27:48.940] Unless you can prove a nexus [01:27:48.940 --> 01:27:51.940] Between the state law you're being prosecuted under [01:27:51.940 --> 01:27:54.940] As being controlled by the federal law [01:27:54.940 --> 01:27:55.940] You're citing [01:27:55.940 --> 01:27:58.940] You're not going to win that argument [01:27:58.940 --> 01:27:59.940] Okay [01:27:59.940 --> 01:28:01.940] It's plain and simple [01:28:01.940 --> 01:28:03.940] You have to show that the state law [01:28:03.940 --> 01:28:05.940] Under which you're being prosecuted [01:28:05.940 --> 01:28:09.940] Is basically what we were talking about [01:28:09.940 --> 01:28:11.940] With another caller earlier in the show [01:28:11.940 --> 01:28:12.940] Where they're talking about [01:28:12.940 --> 01:28:14.940] They can't be prosecuted under an ordinance [01:28:14.940 --> 01:28:15.940] And I said yes, you can [01:28:15.940 --> 01:28:17.940] If the ordinance is based on a state law [01:28:17.940 --> 01:28:22.940] And the criminal complaint cites that state law [01:28:22.940 --> 01:28:23.940] Okay [01:28:23.940 --> 01:28:25.940] Well, it's the same thing except [01:28:25.940 --> 01:28:27.940] There's no requirement that the state law [01:28:27.940 --> 01:28:29.940] Cite the federal law [01:28:29.940 --> 01:28:30.940] All right [01:28:30.940 --> 01:28:32.940] If the state implements a federal law [01:28:32.940 --> 01:28:34.940] By enacting state legislation [01:28:34.940 --> 01:28:36.940] That empowers that federal law [01:28:36.940 --> 01:28:37.940] Within the state [01:28:37.940 --> 01:28:39.940] The federal law is still controlling [01:28:39.940 --> 01:28:42.940] Over what the state can do with it [01:28:42.940 --> 01:28:45.940] But unless you establish that relationship [01:28:45.940 --> 01:28:47.940] You can't argue that the state law [01:28:47.940 --> 01:28:49.940] Has a governing federal law [01:28:49.940 --> 01:28:51.940] You understand? [01:28:51.940 --> 01:28:53.940] Okay [01:28:53.940 --> 01:28:55.940] So my question would be [01:28:55.940 --> 01:28:58.940] How would I define transportation [01:28:58.940 --> 01:29:01.940] In the show that it has a commercial definition? [01:29:01.940 --> 01:29:03.940] Well, here's the thing [01:29:03.940 --> 01:29:05.940] How does your state law say that [01:29:05.940 --> 01:29:07.940] The courts and everyone else [01:29:07.940 --> 01:29:11.940] Is required to interpret statute? [01:29:11.940 --> 01:29:13.940] How does it say that [01:29:13.940 --> 01:29:16.940] Statutes or laws must be written? [01:29:16.940 --> 01:29:17.940] See, here in Texas [01:29:17.940 --> 01:29:18.940] There are two specific chapters [01:29:18.940 --> 01:29:20.940] Chapters 311 and 312 [01:29:20.940 --> 01:29:22.940] Of the Texas government code [01:29:22.940 --> 01:29:23.940] Okay [01:29:23.940 --> 01:29:25.940] One is dealing with statutory interpretation [01:29:25.940 --> 01:29:27.940] That's chapter 311 [01:29:27.940 --> 01:29:29.940] One is how laws are to be written [01:29:29.940 --> 01:29:31.940] Chapter 312 [01:29:31.940 --> 01:29:32.940] Okay [01:29:32.940 --> 01:29:34.940] And there are specific instructions [01:29:34.940 --> 01:29:36.940] In there over how each of those works [01:29:36.940 --> 01:29:38.940] Let me get back from this break [01:29:38.940 --> 01:29:40.940] And I will tell you how that is [01:29:40.940 --> 01:29:41.940] And that's what you're going to have to look for [01:29:41.940 --> 01:29:42.940] In your own state [01:29:42.940 --> 01:29:43.940] Okay [01:29:43.940 --> 01:29:45.940] So hang on just a second [01:29:45.940 --> 01:29:46.940] All right, folks [01:29:46.940 --> 01:29:47.940] This is rule of law radio [01:29:47.940 --> 01:29:49.940] We've got two segments left in the show [01:29:49.940 --> 01:29:51.940] So if you want to talk about something [01:29:51.940 --> 01:29:53.940] 512-646-1984 [01:29:53.940 --> 01:29:55.940] If you want to call and get in line [01:29:55.940 --> 01:29:57.940] And we will try to get to you if we can [01:29:57.940 --> 01:29:59.940] Hold on to me right back [01:29:59.940 --> 01:30:01.940] It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays [01:30:01.940 --> 01:30:03.940] Someone wants your name, social security number [01:30:03.940 --> 01:30:04.940] And date of birth [01:30:04.940 --> 01:30:05.940] But you should think twice [01:30:05.940 --> 01:30:07.940] Before giving away your personal data [01:30:07.940 --> 01:30:09.940] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht [01:30:09.940 --> 01:30:11.940] And I'll say more in just a moment [01:30:11.940 --> 01:30:13.940] Google is watching you [01:30:13.940 --> 01:30:15.940] Recording everything you've ever searched for [01:30:15.940 --> 01:30:16.940] And creating a massive database [01:30:16.940 --> 01:30:18.940] Of your personal information [01:30:18.940 --> 01:30:19.940] That's creepy [01:30:19.940 --> 01:30:21.940] But it doesn't have to be that way [01:30:21.940 --> 01:30:24.940] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine [01:30:24.940 --> 01:30:27.940] Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address [01:30:27.940 --> 01:30:29.940] Make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies [01:30:29.940 --> 01:30:31.940] And their third party certified [01:30:31.940 --> 01:30:34.940] If you don't like big brother spying on you [01:30:34.940 --> 01:30:36.940] Start over with Startpage [01:30:36.940 --> 01:30:38.940] Great search results and total privacy [01:30:38.940 --> 01:30:41.940] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine [01:30:41.940 --> 01:30:44.940] Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere [01:30:44.940 --> 01:30:47.940] But just because a piece of paper asks for information [01:30:47.940 --> 01:30:48.940] Doesn't mean you have to give it [01:30:48.940 --> 01:30:50.940] I lay blank spaces on forms all the time [01:30:50.940 --> 01:30:53.940] Or I write N slash A for not applicable [01:30:53.940 --> 01:30:55.940] And usually nobody notices or cares [01:30:55.940 --> 01:30:58.940] I never give my social security number or date of birth [01:30:58.940 --> 01:31:01.940] Unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment [01:31:01.940 --> 01:31:02.940] Or a government requirement [01:31:02.940 --> 01:31:05.940] And I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization [01:31:05.940 --> 01:31:07.940] Unless I actually want them to call me [01:31:07.940 --> 01:31:08.940] And that's pretty rare [01:31:08.940 --> 01:31:10.940] To preserve our vanishing privacy [01:31:10.940 --> 01:31:13.940] We need to practice saying no to random data requests [01:31:13.940 --> 01:31:15.940] It's like exercising a muscle [01:31:15.940 --> 01:31:17.940] It gets easier the more you do it [01:31:17.940 --> 01:31:19.940] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht [01:31:19.940 --> 01:31:22.940] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com [01:31:30.940 --> 01:31:31.940] I lost my son [01:31:31.940 --> 01:31:32.940] My nephew [01:31:32.940 --> 01:31:33.940] My uncle [01:31:33.940 --> 01:31:35.940] On September 11, 2001 [01:31:35.940 --> 01:31:38.940] Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11 [01:31:38.940 --> 01:31:41.940] World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper [01:31:41.940 --> 01:31:43.940] Was not hit by a plane [01:31:43.940 --> 01:31:45.940] I will be official explanation [01:31:45.940 --> 01:31:47.940] Is that fire brought down building 7 [01:31:47.940 --> 01:31:50.940] Over 1,200 architects and engineers [01:31:50.940 --> 01:31:51.940] Looked into the evidence [01:31:51.940 --> 01:31:53.940] And believed there is more to the story [01:31:53.940 --> 01:31:54.940] Bring justice to my son [01:31:54.940 --> 01:31:55.940] My uncle [01:31:55.940 --> 01:31:56.940] My nephew [01:31:56.940 --> 01:31:57.940] My son [01:31:57.940 --> 01:31:58.940] Go to buildingwhat.org [01:31:58.940 --> 01:32:00.940] Why it fell, why it matters [01:32:00.940 --> 01:32:01.940] And what you can do [01:32:02.940 --> 01:32:05.940] Rule of law radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar [01:32:05.940 --> 01:32:08.940] In today's America we live in an us against them society [01:32:08.940 --> 01:32:10.940] If we the people are ever going to have a free society [01:32:10.940 --> 01:32:13.940] Then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights [01:32:13.940 --> 01:32:16.940] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place [01:32:16.940 --> 01:32:18.940] The right to act in our own private capacity [01:32:18.940 --> 01:32:20.940] And most importantly the right to due process of law [01:32:20.940 --> 01:32:23.940] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity [01:32:23.940 --> 01:32:26.940] To learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process [01:32:26.940 --> 01:32:28.940] Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig [01:32:28.940 --> 01:32:29.940] In conjunction with Rule of Law Radio [01:32:29.940 --> 01:32:32.940] Has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available [01:32:32.940 --> 01:32:34.940] That will help you understand what due process is [01:32:34.940 --> 01:32:36.940] And how to hold courts to the rule of law [01:32:36.940 --> 01:32:38.940] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material [01:32:38.940 --> 01:32:41.940] At ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today [01:32:41.940 --> 01:32:43.940] By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book [01:32:43.940 --> 01:32:45.940] The Texas Transportation Code, the law versus the lie [01:32:45.940 --> 01:32:48.940] Video and audio of the original 2009 seminar [01:32:48.940 --> 01:32:51.940] Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material [01:32:51.940 --> 01:32:53.940] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material [01:32:53.940 --> 01:32:55.940] From ruleoflawradio.com [01:32:55.940 --> 01:32:58.940] Order your copy today and together we can have a free society [01:32:58.940 --> 01:33:00.940] We all want to and deserve [01:33:04.940 --> 01:33:07.940] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network [01:33:07.940 --> 01:33:10.940] At LogosRadioNetwork.com [01:33:31.940 --> 01:33:33.940] Alright folks, we are back [01:33:33.940 --> 01:33:35.940] This is Rule of Law Radio [01:33:35.940 --> 01:33:38.940] And we are currently talking to Khalib in Maryland [01:33:38.940 --> 01:33:40.940] Alright Khalib, let's continue [01:33:44.940 --> 01:33:46.940] Khalib, are you there? [01:33:46.940 --> 01:33:47.940] Yeah, I'm here [01:33:47.940 --> 01:33:48.940] Okay [01:33:50.940 --> 01:33:52.940] Alright, so anyway [01:33:52.940 --> 01:33:56.940] That nexus between the state law and the federal law [01:33:56.940 --> 01:33:59.940] You're going to have to find where [01:33:59.940 --> 01:34:03.940] Not only does your state say how those laws have to be read and interpreted [01:34:03.940 --> 01:34:07.940] In relation to your question on how do you define transportation [01:34:07.940 --> 01:34:11.940] You have to understand what those two parts of your law say [01:34:11.940 --> 01:34:16.940] Because what you're dealing with is what's known as a term of art [01:34:16.940 --> 01:34:20.940] Okay, transportation in law is a term of art [01:34:20.940 --> 01:34:23.940] What does term of art mean? [01:34:23.940 --> 01:34:27.940] It literally means that it's a term or phrase that the legislature [01:34:27.940 --> 01:34:30.940] Can change the meaning of for the purpose of law [01:34:30.940 --> 01:34:33.940] Versus its common and ordinary usage [01:34:33.940 --> 01:34:37.940] The question about what your rules say [01:34:37.940 --> 01:34:39.940] Like our chapter 312 here does [01:34:39.940 --> 01:34:46.940] Is that when the legislature writes a law using such a term or phrase [01:34:46.940 --> 01:34:50.940] A word of term or term of art [01:34:50.940 --> 01:34:57.940] That they must give it the same meaning when they're reading or writing a law [01:34:57.940 --> 01:35:04.940] As is used by experts in that field or profession or art [01:35:04.940 --> 01:35:05.940] Okay [01:35:07.940 --> 01:35:11.940] So if it has or by other law [01:35:11.940 --> 01:35:15.940] Now here's the thing about other law [01:35:15.940 --> 01:35:19.940] It doesn't limit what other law means [01:35:19.940 --> 01:35:22.940] You start with Texas, does Texas define it? [01:35:22.940 --> 01:35:23.940] In your case Maryland [01:35:23.940 --> 01:35:24.940] Does Maryland define it? [01:35:24.940 --> 01:35:28.940] In any law anywhere the singular term transportation [01:35:28.940 --> 01:35:31.940] Here in Texas they do not [01:35:31.940 --> 01:35:36.940] That does not mean there isn't law that doesn't have the definition [01:35:36.940 --> 01:35:43.940] It just means that Texas, the legislature, didn't create one for the state laws to adhere to [01:35:43.940 --> 01:35:48.940] So based upon that we have two other criteria [01:35:48.940 --> 01:35:52.940] The meaning given to it by experts in the profession [01:35:52.940 --> 01:35:58.940] Business, occupation, or art, or by other law [01:35:58.940 --> 01:36:01.940] Well the thing there is in the case of transportation [01:36:01.940 --> 01:36:04.940] The definition supplied is the same [01:36:04.940 --> 01:36:08.940] Both by other law and by those experts [01:36:08.940 --> 01:36:09.940] Okay [01:36:12.940 --> 01:36:13.940] You following me so far? [01:36:17.940 --> 01:36:18.940] Hello [01:36:18.940 --> 01:36:21.940] Great all my callers disappeared all of a sudden [01:36:21.940 --> 01:36:24.940] Like the board killed itself [01:36:24.940 --> 01:36:25.940] That's not good [01:36:25.940 --> 01:36:29.940] If you're listening call back in and we'll get this back up here [01:36:29.940 --> 01:36:32.940] I don't know what happened but all the callers just got dumped [01:36:32.940 --> 01:36:34.940] I don't know how that occurred [01:36:34.940 --> 01:36:37.940] Either way let me finish this up here [01:36:37.940 --> 01:36:41.940] So in relation to what federal law says it means [01:36:41.940 --> 01:36:44.940] And what it means in relation to the experts [01:36:44.940 --> 01:36:47.940] All you need to find is authoritative examples [01:36:47.940 --> 01:36:50.940] You have the federal statute that defines it [01:36:50.940 --> 01:36:53.940] You just have to prove that the federal statute that defines it [01:36:53.940 --> 01:36:57.940] Has at least some sort of relationship [01:36:57.940 --> 01:37:02.940] With whatever activity you're being charged under in the state [01:37:02.940 --> 01:37:05.940] Okay, such as transportation [01:37:05.940 --> 01:37:08.940] Now as far as augmenting that [01:37:08.940 --> 01:37:12.940] You can also show that experts and professionals [01:37:12.940 --> 01:37:17.940] In those industries define it the same way that federal law does [01:37:17.940 --> 01:37:20.940] It's the movement of persons or goods or property for hire [01:37:20.940 --> 01:37:23.940] Or compensation by a carrier [01:37:23.940 --> 01:37:24.940] All right [01:37:24.940 --> 01:37:28.940] And so all you got to do is find authoritative examples of both of those [01:37:28.940 --> 01:37:30.940] You have one in the federal statute [01:37:30.940 --> 01:37:33.940] And you just need to find one dealing with the other [01:37:33.940 --> 01:37:35.940] Once you've done that [01:37:35.940 --> 01:37:37.940] And you can find supreme court cases on it [01:37:37.940 --> 01:37:39.940] You can find whatever else there is [01:37:39.940 --> 01:37:42.940] Because that too is other law [01:37:42.940 --> 01:37:43.940] Okay [01:37:43.940 --> 01:37:45.940] And by doing that [01:37:45.940 --> 01:37:49.940] You now have a significant hammer to hit them with [01:37:49.940 --> 01:37:52.940] Because they can't claim the state sees it differently [01:37:52.940 --> 01:37:56.940] The state is not allowed to see it differently [01:37:56.940 --> 01:37:59.940] Because it has specific rules in place [01:37:59.940 --> 01:38:02.940] Which you need to find and study up on [01:38:02.940 --> 01:38:06.940] That says how they have to do it [01:38:06.940 --> 01:38:09.940] And when they didn't do it that way [01:38:09.940 --> 01:38:11.940] Or won't do it that way [01:38:11.940 --> 01:38:14.940] Then you have a valid cause for appeal [01:38:14.940 --> 01:38:18.940] Because the court did not apply the law to the facts [01:38:18.940 --> 01:38:22.940] And did not adhere to the rules of statutory construction [01:38:22.940 --> 01:38:25.940] Or anything else in order to come up with a definition [01:38:25.940 --> 01:38:28.940] That is not supported by state law [01:38:28.940 --> 01:38:29.940] Okay [01:38:29.940 --> 01:38:31.940] So that's what there is to that [01:38:31.940 --> 01:38:33.940] If you want to ask me another question [01:38:33.940 --> 01:38:36.940] I'm going to need you to call back in and get back on the board [01:38:36.940 --> 01:38:39.940] Real quick before I have to start taking other callers [01:38:39.940 --> 01:38:43.940] So if you want to do that 512-646-1984 [01:38:43.940 --> 01:38:45.940] Get a call back and I'll get you back on here [01:38:45.940 --> 01:38:48.940] If you want to talk about another question [01:38:48.940 --> 01:38:51.940] But in the meantime, that's what you need to be looking for [01:38:51.940 --> 01:38:56.940] So don't assume to use a different state [01:38:56.940 --> 01:39:00.940] Or federal law in a state case [01:39:00.940 --> 01:39:04.940] Unless you can show that there is a specific relationship [01:39:04.940 --> 01:39:07.940] Between the state law issue and the federal law [01:39:07.940 --> 01:39:09.940] You're attempting to use [01:39:09.940 --> 01:39:10.940] Okay [01:39:10.940 --> 01:39:13.940] Another state's law will never be controlling over the state law [01:39:13.940 --> 01:39:16.940] You're in unless they're one and the same [01:39:16.940 --> 01:39:17.940] Okay [01:39:17.940 --> 01:39:20.940] So you'll never be able to use another state law to control an outcome [01:39:20.940 --> 01:39:26.940] You can only use the other state law as an advisory type of thing [01:39:26.940 --> 01:39:28.940] But not as a controlling thing [01:39:28.940 --> 01:39:35.940] But once you establish that the state law was derived from the federal law [01:39:35.940 --> 01:39:39.940] Then the federal law remains controlling [01:39:39.940 --> 01:39:41.940] Not the state law [01:39:41.940 --> 01:39:44.940] Because it involves a nexus with federal law [01:39:44.940 --> 01:39:48.940] And anytime that happens, federal law is controlling [01:39:48.940 --> 01:39:51.940] That's the supremacy clause going in both directions [01:39:51.940 --> 01:39:53.940] Just like it's supposed to [01:39:53.940 --> 01:39:54.940] Okay [01:39:54.940 --> 01:39:55.940] So [01:39:55.940 --> 01:39:58.940] Given that, that's what you need to find [01:39:58.940 --> 01:40:00.940] And that's what you need to be able to write up and prove up [01:40:00.940 --> 01:40:02.940] So do that [01:40:02.940 --> 01:40:03.940] Alright, that's it [01:40:03.940 --> 01:40:06.940] Next caller up on the board until he calls us [01:40:06.940 --> 01:40:08.940] Clee calls us back [01:40:08.940 --> 01:40:11.940] Looks like Truth Raider again [01:40:11.940 --> 01:40:13.940] Raider, what do you have? [01:40:13.940 --> 01:40:16.940] I think you might have answered that question [01:40:16.940 --> 01:40:19.940] But I'm just going to ask it again [01:40:19.940 --> 01:40:23.940] USC-182107 [01:40:23.940 --> 01:40:30.940] That's supposed to be that the documents that states our courts have [01:40:30.940 --> 01:40:35.940] Like if they receive filings from an individual by law [01:40:35.940 --> 01:40:39.940] They have to stamp and have a date [01:40:39.940 --> 01:40:42.940] Who's received it, time, etc [01:40:42.940 --> 01:40:45.940] You said 2107? [01:40:45.940 --> 01:40:54.940] Yes [01:40:54.940 --> 01:40:59.940] Time for appeal to court of appeals? [01:40:59.940 --> 01:41:02.940] No, it's not part of it [01:41:02.940 --> 01:41:04.940] USC-18 [01:41:04.940 --> 01:41:07.940] It's about the requirement to [01:41:07.940 --> 01:41:09.940] Communicize exactly yet [01:41:09.940 --> 01:41:14.940] Oh, Consilent removal or mutilation generally? [01:41:14.940 --> 01:41:16.940] Mutilation, okay [01:41:16.940 --> 01:41:19.940] This has to do with records and reports [01:41:19.940 --> 01:41:22.940] Okay [01:41:22.940 --> 01:41:26.940] Yeah, well, it's kind of reference to reports [01:41:26.940 --> 01:41:29.940] No, records and reports [01:41:29.940 --> 01:41:33.940] Which is different than a notice from a court in that regard [01:41:33.940 --> 01:41:35.940] When it goes out [01:41:35.940 --> 01:41:41.940] But this deals with Conciles, Remus, Mutilates, Obliterates, or Destroys or attempts to do so [01:41:41.940 --> 01:41:44.940] Okay, it's talking about the records and reports [01:41:44.940 --> 01:41:47.940] It's not talking about the fact that it's not signed [01:41:47.940 --> 01:41:51.940] Where are you getting signed out of this? [01:41:51.940 --> 01:41:56.940] It's something in that section or something that's close to that that describes it [01:41:56.940 --> 01:42:00.940] Might be off by a number or two, but somewhere in USC-18 [01:42:00.940 --> 01:42:02.940] Maybe you know what the number is [01:42:02.940 --> 01:42:08.940] Well, there could be a thousand places and different things that that definition could apply to [01:42:08.940 --> 01:42:11.940] That have nothing to do with this [01:42:11.940 --> 01:42:13.940] Okay [01:42:13.940 --> 01:42:15.940] Well, documents that we receive here [01:42:15.940 --> 01:42:18.940] Say for example, the oath for the judge [01:42:18.940 --> 01:42:21.940] And of course she's also a lawyer as well [01:42:21.940 --> 01:42:24.940] So she also has an oath as a lawyer or attorney or whatever that is [01:42:24.940 --> 01:42:27.940] Doesn't have a proper stamp on it [01:42:27.940 --> 01:42:29.940] Doesn't have a date [01:42:29.940 --> 01:42:34.940] Does the law require it to have one? [01:42:34.940 --> 01:42:44.940] Does your constitution or your state law require that such a thing be on any document for that purpose? [01:42:44.940 --> 01:42:46.940] I don't know the answer to that [01:42:46.940 --> 01:42:50.940] Well, then you don't know that there's anything wrong with that then, do you? [01:42:50.940 --> 01:42:52.940] No, that's why I'm asking you to get that [01:42:52.940 --> 01:42:53.940] Well, I can't answer you [01:42:53.940 --> 01:42:59.940] I'm not in Pennsylvania or Oregon or Washington or see or anywhere else like that [01:42:59.940 --> 01:43:00.940] All right [01:43:00.940 --> 01:43:05.940] I'm in Texas and in Texas certain things do and certain things don't [01:43:05.940 --> 01:43:09.940] I don't know about the particular document you're asking for because you haven't made that really clear [01:43:09.940 --> 01:43:14.940] And even if, even so, it's up in your neck of the woods, not mine, so I wouldn't know [01:43:14.940 --> 01:43:16.940] Right, right [01:43:16.940 --> 01:43:19.940] I was thinking of something that if it was a federal [01:43:19.940 --> 01:43:20.940] mandatory [01:43:20.940 --> 01:43:25.940] The federal can't dictate how the state has to do its internal forms [01:43:25.940 --> 01:43:32.940] Unless it has something to do with federal grants and a federal program that those forms relate to [01:43:32.940 --> 01:43:34.940] Okay [01:43:34.940 --> 01:43:36.940] All right [01:43:36.940 --> 01:43:38.940] I do have one thing I have to mention [01:43:38.940 --> 01:43:40.940] After the commercial break comes up [01:43:40.940 --> 01:43:43.940] And I'll wait to the other side if you want to go ahead and take that [01:43:43.940 --> 01:43:46.940] Well, Khalib's back up here, so you may be waiting [01:43:46.940 --> 01:43:48.940] But anyhow, hang on and I'll get back to you [01:43:48.940 --> 01:43:49.940] Yeah [01:43:49.940 --> 01:43:51.940] All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio [01:43:51.940 --> 01:43:56.940] We're gonna take our last break and then we'll be back [01:44:21.940 --> 01:44:24.940] Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need [01:44:24.940 --> 01:44:29.940] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products [01:44:29.940 --> 01:44:30.940] Most of which we reject [01:44:30.940 --> 01:44:33.940] We have come to trust Young Jevity so much [01:44:33.940 --> 01:44:39.940] We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many others [01:44:39.940 --> 01:44:42.940] When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com [01:44:42.940 --> 01:44:46.940] Your health will improve as you help support quality radio [01:44:46.940 --> 01:44:49.940] As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity [01:44:49.940 --> 01:44:51.940] You may want to join us [01:44:51.940 --> 01:44:54.940] As a distributor, you can experience improved health [01:44:54.940 --> 01:44:56.940] Help your friends and family [01:44:56.940 --> 01:44:58.940] And increase your income [01:44:58.940 --> 01:45:27.940] Order now [01:45:28.940 --> 01:45:33.940] It was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience [01:45:33.940 --> 01:45:35.940] Even if you're not in a lawsuit [01:45:35.940 --> 01:45:38.940] You can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:38.940 --> 01:45:42.940] About the principles and practices that control our American courts [01:45:42.940 --> 01:45:48.940] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases [01:45:48.940 --> 01:45:51.940] Pro-say tactics, and much more [01:45:51.940 --> 01:45:54.940] Please visit ruleoflongradio.com [01:45:54.940 --> 01:45:59.940] And click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ [01:46:25.940 --> 01:46:29.940] All right folks, we are back [01:46:29.940 --> 01:46:31.940] This is rule of law radio [01:46:31.940 --> 01:46:34.940] We are now in the last segment of the show for this Monday night [01:46:34.940 --> 01:46:37.940] And we're going to try to finish up real quick with Kaleev [01:46:37.940 --> 01:46:40.940] And then with Truth Raider and see if we can't end it [01:46:40.940 --> 01:46:42.940] On a good note, we're getting all the callers done [01:46:42.940 --> 01:46:45.940] All right, Kaleev, let's see if we can finish this up here [01:46:47.940 --> 01:46:50.940] And he just disappeared again [01:46:50.940 --> 01:46:54.940] Okay, I don't know what the heck that is [01:46:54.940 --> 01:46:57.940] Hang on and we'll see [01:46:57.940 --> 01:47:00.940] In the meantime, all right, Raider, go ahead [01:47:00.940 --> 01:47:02.940] Okay, real quick, I'll just tell you what it is [01:47:02.940 --> 01:47:08.940] A friend of mine down the street looked up on his iPhone, the Oregon State Bar's official site [01:47:08.940 --> 01:47:12.940] And he looked at it and concerning traffic violations [01:47:12.940 --> 01:47:19.940] I don't know, their interpretation is they're saying that driving with a suspended license or not having a license is a misdemeanor [01:47:19.940 --> 01:47:21.940] That's what they're saying [01:47:21.940 --> 01:47:24.940] But it clearly says in the statutes in which you reference [01:47:24.940 --> 01:47:29.940] And you confirm that that it was supposed to be considered civil infractions [01:47:29.940 --> 01:47:36.940] Now, it also says once an offender has 20 convictions or more [01:47:36.940 --> 01:47:43.940] For the civil infractions or whatever the minor consequences are [01:47:43.940 --> 01:47:49.940] The next one could be considered a misdemeanor as a habitual traffic offender [01:47:49.940 --> 01:47:52.940] Okay [01:47:52.940 --> 01:47:55.940] And you're going to do what with this information? [01:47:55.940 --> 01:48:06.940] Well, it would sound to me then like the prosecutor's office is operating on misinformation and disseminating misinformation to the public [01:48:06.940 --> 01:48:12.940] So I'd write to the DA's office and complain that they're disseminating false information [01:48:12.940 --> 01:48:14.940] Okay [01:48:14.940 --> 01:48:18.940] All right, then I'll consider doing that, take that under advisement [01:48:18.940 --> 01:48:19.940] Okay [01:48:19.940 --> 01:48:21.940] All right, did the police got that gone? [01:48:21.940 --> 01:48:22.940] Yeah, he's back [01:48:22.940 --> 01:48:27.940] Okay, I'll talk to you later. Good night, God bless [01:48:27.940 --> 01:48:34.940] All right, let's try this again, Khalid. I don't know why you keep disappearing, but here you are [01:48:34.940 --> 01:48:37.940] Hey, I don't know what I need with Bob, listen to me [01:48:37.940 --> 01:48:38.940] All right [01:48:38.940 --> 01:48:41.940] I wanted to ask that real quick because I know you want a short time schedule [01:48:41.940 --> 01:48:50.940] So I'm using this information right now for my federal case against the officers that pulled me over [01:48:50.940 --> 01:48:53.940] I was just looking up the rules and interpretations for Maryland [01:48:53.940 --> 01:48:56.940] I remember you were saying something before you got disconnected [01:48:56.940 --> 01:48:58.940] But I wanted to let you think what you were saying [01:48:58.940 --> 01:49:04.940] No, that's okay, I did say it while I was waiting on you to call back [01:49:04.940 --> 01:49:06.940] Okay [01:49:06.940 --> 01:49:08.940] Did you not hear that part? [01:49:08.940 --> 01:49:11.940] About the rules and interpretations [01:49:11.940 --> 01:49:16.940] Yeah, all the stuff I was talking about while we were disconnected, did you get all that? [01:49:16.940 --> 01:49:22.940] Yeah, I got a majority of it, but you were saying that transportation is a term of art [01:49:22.940 --> 01:49:34.940] Right, and I was explaining how that nexus has to exist and where you find and prove that nexus exists in order to establish what the proper definition is between state law and any other law [01:49:34.940 --> 01:49:37.940] Okay [01:49:37.940 --> 01:49:50.940] And you need to do that anytime you're attempting to use some definition from someplace else, you have to show the nexus and that the other law is actually controlling [01:49:50.940 --> 01:49:55.940] If you can't do that, you're not going to win that argument [01:49:55.940 --> 01:49:57.940] Okay [01:49:57.940 --> 01:50:02.940] So I have to show how the federal law controls the state law as far as transportation [01:50:02.940 --> 01:50:07.940] That's correct, if you're using a federal definition for it, you absolutely do [01:50:07.940 --> 01:50:10.940] Okay [01:50:10.940 --> 01:50:21.940] Well, yeah, because I'm saying that I mean I was, in my father, in my federal case, I was making an argument that I wasn't engaged in transportation and having to, you know, all the laws must embrace one subject [01:50:21.940 --> 01:50:34.940] So my next step would try to be to prove how transportation is defined in the commercial capacity before I try to use the fact that I wasn't engaged in transportation [01:50:34.940 --> 01:50:37.940] Okay, well, here's another way to approach it [01:50:37.940 --> 01:50:45.940] When they attempt to say they're charging you under just a motor vehicle code, it doesn't even say transportation, it's a motor vehicle code, okay? [01:50:45.940 --> 01:50:46.940] Okay [01:50:46.940 --> 01:50:52.940] That separates a commercial driver in a other than weight class [01:50:52.940 --> 01:50:59.940] When someone is driving as a means of earning a living versus someone who is not [01:50:59.940 --> 01:51:05.940] How can they both be considered motor vehicles under those particular principles? [01:51:05.940 --> 01:51:10.940] One is using it for a completely different purpose than the other, so how can it be a single subject? [01:51:10.940 --> 01:51:16.940] One is using it in a manner inconsistent with the other, therefore, how can it be a single subject? [01:51:16.940 --> 01:51:24.940] How can motor vehicle apply the same on both sides of a fence and not be different subjects? [01:51:24.940 --> 01:51:33.940] When the fence is there to separate how the activities themselves exist, one's commercial, one's non-commercial [01:51:33.940 --> 01:51:41.940] So how then do you define the non-commercials operating a motor vehicle without first proving that he's doing it for business and vice versa? [01:51:41.940 --> 01:51:47.940] If you're trying to claim that the business individual is supposed to be doing it only in private, then you have to be able to prove that [01:51:47.940 --> 01:51:53.940] Otherwise, you're talking about two different things that can't exist under the same subject [01:51:53.940 --> 01:52:04.940] Right, and I see as far as the terms of art, because I see that when I filed, because right now I was at the fall judgment and they put an emotion in the vacate [01:52:04.940 --> 01:52:12.940] And they keep using motor vehicle and driver, so I see that they're trying to keep using that term of art to establish jurisdiction over what was going on [01:52:12.940 --> 01:52:13.940] Right [01:52:13.940 --> 01:52:24.940] I have put that Article 3, Section 29 of the Maryland Constitution says that all laws must operate for one subject [01:52:24.940 --> 01:52:34.940] So I was saying that before I could violate the transportation code, I had to be engaged in transportation and that the defendant said no proof that I was engaged in transportation [01:52:34.940 --> 01:52:42.940] But I just wanted to figure out how could I define, how could I use the definition of transportation and link it to a commercial activity [01:52:42.940 --> 01:52:53.940] Like I say, if you're trying to use the federal definition or you use the state law to say how the state must interpret the definition when the state legislature did not provide one [01:52:53.940 --> 01:53:01.940] And it is a term or phrase of art, then that's your out right there, that's how you can use it, there is other law [01:53:01.940 --> 01:53:12.940] Here is the United States Supreme Court case, Interstate Commerce Commission versus Brimson, which clearly defines transportation as the movement of persons, goods or property by a carrier [01:53:12.940 --> 01:53:22.940] Carriers operate for profit and for hire, either by contract or by private or by common, those are the only types of carriers that exist and I'm not one of those [01:53:22.940 --> 01:53:24.940] So how are you applying transportation to me? [01:53:24.940 --> 01:53:38.940] You also have the federal definition, which is blah blah blah, out of USC, blah blah blah, then you have how the experts in the industry and the profession and the business and the art define the term, which means business activity [01:53:38.940 --> 01:53:46.940] So again, what is your proof that the state defined a term that would apply to me in relation to these statutes? [01:53:46.940 --> 01:53:48.940] See how that works? [01:53:48.940 --> 01:53:56.940] Yeah, so basically they have no proof that there's a definition of transportation in the statute and I can use the court [01:53:56.940 --> 01:54:04.940] No, they have no proof that there is a non-commercial definition of transportation in the state statutes [01:54:04.940 --> 01:54:19.940] Okay, so I say all laws must embrace one subject and that the state definition of transportation is not shown with a non-commercial use [01:54:19.940 --> 01:54:25.940] No, the state doesn't define the term transportation, does it? [01:54:25.940 --> 01:54:35.940] No. Okay, then don't say it the way you just said, say it the way I said, there is no state established definition for the term transportation [01:54:35.940 --> 01:54:41.940] Hence there is no definition showing that transportation is anything other than commercial [01:54:41.940 --> 01:54:54.940] However, we have federal law, we have United States Supreme Court decisions and we have experts in the industry art of profession of transportation who all define it as commercial related activity [01:54:54.940 --> 01:54:59.940] Okay, so let me say I got it correctly one more time [01:54:59.940 --> 01:55:07.940] So you said that there's no state definition of transportation and what was that second part you said? That was the part that I forgot about [01:55:07.940 --> 01:55:18.940] Yeah, and hence there is no state definition to contradict the definitions found in other law or from experts and professionals in the industry art of occupation [01:55:18.940 --> 01:55:26.940] Okay, so before I use the argument that is defined as commercial, I have to say that is not defined in the statute [01:55:26.940 --> 01:55:39.940] You have to establish that no definition exists for the term in state law, therefore under whatever rules of procedure you're looking at there on terms of art out of your government code or whatever it is [01:55:39.940 --> 01:55:52.940] How they have to read and interpret laws and apply them as well as statutory construction then you can use those sections to say so now we must look at other law [01:55:52.940 --> 01:56:10.940] And other law in this case is going to be United States Supreme Court opinion. It's going to be a federal statute and it's going to be some authoritative source relative to agents or in our professions of the occupation whatever that say this is what it means [01:56:10.940 --> 01:56:24.940] You don't need all of them, two of them would be fine since you've got the Supreme Court opinion and interstate commerce commission versus Brimson which is what established the definition of transportation as found in black's law [01:56:24.940 --> 01:56:29.940] Don't cite black's law, cite the court opinion [01:56:29.940 --> 01:56:42.940] Okay, and then you have the federal definition out of you would be much better looking to see if one exists under the Motor Care Safety Act under Title 49 of the USC [01:56:42.940 --> 01:56:55.940] That's more directly related. Looking at the definition in Title 18 is not going to be sufficient because you cannot draw a corollary between Title 18 subject matter and the state subject matter [01:56:55.940 --> 01:57:04.940] But if you do it under Title 49 showing that it deals with commercial use of the highways then you've got a hammer you can hit with [01:57:04.940 --> 01:57:22.940] Okay, alright so I just want to make sure I got it right. So there's no state definition of transportation and use the statutory construction and how states interpret terms of art to show that there was no [01:57:22.940 --> 01:57:35.940] There was no definition of transportation that doesn't have a commercial use and then you say I could use the Supreme Court opinion and I could use federal law at that point. I don't use Title 18 [01:57:35.940 --> 01:57:36.940] Yeah [01:57:36.940 --> 01:57:43.940] Okay, I mean I heard you say I just got cleaned it up. I don't clean it up you know I can sometimes I'm moving around but I got the gist of it for real [01:57:43.940 --> 01:57:55.940] Yeah and so I'm leaving you at the gist of it. Figure it out and word it correctly and you've got a winning argument because they can't change what it means in the state when the state did not define the term [01:57:55.940 --> 01:58:08.940] And state law specifically says that they must define it in the way that other law or experts in the industry occupation profession or art define it [01:58:08.940 --> 01:58:13.940] But they're not there's no way for them to get off the hook and declare it means something else [01:58:13.940 --> 01:58:20.940] Alright well thank you so much I'm going to take your time and I'll call you next week [01:58:20.940 --> 01:58:22.940] Alright thanks for calling in [01:58:22.940 --> 01:58:33.940] Alright folks this has been the Money Not Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig. I want to thank all of you who called in and for all those who have donated please continue to do so. If you haven't please go to the website [01:58:33.940 --> 01:58:45.940] Look at the fundraiser and set up a recurring donation make a one-time donation just please support us. We can't live and do this work without all of you. Y'all have a great week. Good night and God bless [01:59:03.940 --> 01:59:21.940] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy [01:59:21.940 --> 01:59:41.940] of the New Testament recovery version call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org [01:59:41.940 --> 01:59:59.940] Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com