[00:00.000 --> 00:05.720]  The following, these flashes brought to you by The Low Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:05.720 --> 00:13.440]  bulletins for the commodity market, Today in History, News Updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.440 --> 00:21.240]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.240 --> 00:45.060]  This
[00:45.060 --> 00:50.460]  Ethereum $103.10 and EOS is at $2.32, a crypto coin.
[00:53.960 --> 00:59.580]  Take History, the year 1918, British women over the age of 30 who meet minimum property
[00:59.580 --> 01:04.500]  qualifications get the right to vote when the Representation of the People Act of 1918
[01:04.500 --> 01:06.780]  was passed by Parliament to date in history.
[01:09.280 --> 01:14.180]  In recent news, several Texas-based organizations found a lawsuit today requesting that a federal
[01:14.180 --> 01:18.900]  court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people as potentially illegally registered
[01:18.900 --> 01:19.900]  to vote.
[01:19.900 --> 01:24.580]  The list was compiled after an 11-month-long investigation by the Office of the Texas Secretary
[01:24.580 --> 01:29.460]  of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety, which sought to identify non-U.S.
[01:29.460 --> 01:33.300]  citizens who were registered to vote when obtaining major average license.
[01:33.300 --> 01:37.060]  Over half of the 95,000 didn't indeed vote, it seems.
[01:37.060 --> 01:41.020]  However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were
[01:41.020 --> 01:45.260]  not, in fact, belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:45.260 --> 01:50.820]  Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to vote.
[01:50.820 --> 01:55.180]  Registered voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond
[01:55.180 --> 01:57.020]  with proof of eligibility.
[01:57.020 --> 02:01.180]  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have
[02:01.180 --> 02:05.740]  yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[02:05.740 --> 02:14.060]  A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his neck
[02:14.060 --> 02:16.740]  after a vape pen exploded while he was using it.
[02:16.740 --> 02:20.620]  It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it.
[02:20.620 --> 02:24.220]  An X-ray revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem.
[02:24.220 --> 02:30.420]  The vape store, Smoke and Vape DZ, has refused to comment.
[02:30.420 --> 02:35.180]  First edition anchorwoman, Kristen Diaz, interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of
[02:35.180 --> 02:40.140]  Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association
[02:40.140 --> 02:44.580]  conference, which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February
[02:44.580 --> 02:47.420]  14th to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[02:47.420 --> 02:51.260]  You can find the interview at kiiitv.com.
[02:51.260 --> 03:08.260]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[03:21.260 --> 03:47.260]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[03:47.260 --> 04:15.260]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[04:15.260 --> 04:44.260]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[04:44.260 --> 05:13.260]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[05:13.260 --> 05:41.260]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 1984.
[05:41.260 --> 06:08.260]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 1984.
[06:08.260 --> 06:35.260]  This is Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 6th, 1984.
[06:35.260 --> 06:38.260]  Good evening, Randy.
[06:38.260 --> 06:43.260]  I went to court Tuesday this week.
[06:43.260 --> 06:47.260]  One, there were two motions, my motion.
[06:47.260 --> 06:54.260]  One was continued from the previous hearing, which was a speedy trial motion to dismiss
[06:54.260 --> 06:56.260]  for denial of speedy trial.
[06:56.260 --> 07:02.260]  The other motion was motion to compel discovery.
[07:02.260 --> 07:05.260]  This hearing went on for more than an hour.
[07:05.260 --> 07:12.260]  I spoke for over an hour, but ultimately the judge denied both motions.
[07:12.260 --> 07:27.260]  He denied the motion to compel discovery without prejudice and went into discussion about how that can be brought up even during trial and all this nonsense.
[07:27.260 --> 07:32.260]  He wasn't happy at one point.
[07:32.260 --> 07:52.260]  He yelled at the deputy DA, specifically because the deputy DA has a student under his supervision who he said was going to be responding to the motion, at least the one motion.
[07:52.260 --> 08:02.260]  Instead of the student piping off while I was talking, the deputy DA did, and the judge snapped at him.
[08:02.260 --> 08:07.260]  He needed to make up his mind who was doing this.
[08:07.260 --> 08:17.260]  Then, of course, I brought up that he is doing this to shield himself from me.
[08:17.260 --> 08:23.260]  Anytime you get silence in the courtroom, you know you've nailed it.
[08:23.260 --> 08:25.260]  Struck a nerve.
[08:25.260 --> 08:35.260]  Ultimately, that's how it ended.
[08:35.260 --> 08:42.260]  Did you ask the court for findings of fact and conclusions at law?
[08:42.260 --> 08:45.260]  I screwed up and did not do that this time.
[08:45.260 --> 08:50.260]  Do you usually have like 10 days or something?
[08:50.260 --> 08:53.260]  You've got time to do that. You don't have to do that in the court.
[08:53.260 --> 08:55.260]  No, I don't have time.
[08:55.260 --> 09:08.260]  My trial is set for April 8th, and so today I filed a notice of appeal on the 995 motion that was dismissed at the last hearing.
[09:08.260 --> 09:12.260]  Okay, you've got time for findings of fact then.
[09:12.260 --> 09:18.260]  If you filed a notice of appeal, this is an interlocutory appeal?
[09:18.260 --> 09:23.260]  I don't believe it has to be an interlocutory appeal.
[09:23.260 --> 09:27.260]  No, that's what they call any appeal as prior to a final decision in the case.
[09:27.260 --> 09:32.260]  So this interlocutory, it stops everything.
[09:32.260 --> 09:41.260]  Then it should because I read the statute and it says that your notice of appeal is to be liberally construed.
[09:41.260 --> 09:54.260]  This appeal, I'm trying to find, I read somewhere before a 995 motion is one motion that will stop everything until the appellate court reviews it.
[09:54.260 --> 10:02.260]  Because what the 995 motion it was, it's a motion for dismissal after the preliminary hearing.
[10:02.260 --> 10:25.260]  And the reason, the very valid reason is that after preliminary hearing, the prosecution did not put any testimony in the record regarding me and the quit claim deed that they charging me with recording.
[10:25.260 --> 10:28.260]  They put no testimony whatsoever.
[10:28.260 --> 10:37.260]  And so there's no evidence in the record for a valid holding order for me to answer these charges.
[10:37.260 --> 10:50.260]  Wonderful. Yeah, and that's going to stop the trial as the court that denied the motion in the first place asking for findings of fact.
[10:50.260 --> 10:54.260]  I did do that at that hearing.
[10:54.260 --> 10:56.260]  He declined, the judge declined.
[10:56.260 --> 11:17.260]  Good. Then include with your appeal a petition for writ of mandamus, asking the court of appeals to order him to produce findings of fact, as you can hardly mount an effective appeal if you don't know how the judge made his ruling.
[11:17.260 --> 11:24.260]  Well, let me tell you what happened to the picture. Tim's on here.
[11:24.260 --> 11:27.260]  Hold on. Let me bring in Tim.
[11:27.260 --> 11:31.260]  Tim, you there?
[11:31.260 --> 11:32.260]  Hello?
[11:32.260 --> 11:35.260]  Hello, Tim. Okay.
[11:35.260 --> 11:48.260]  When Tim filed a petition for declarative for writ of mandamus to ask the court to order the judge to provide findings of fact and conclusions of law.
[11:48.260 --> 11:54.260]  They dismissed everything. They dismissed the city's claim against him.
[11:54.260 --> 12:00.260]  They didn't order the judge to provide findings of fact. They just ruled against them.
[12:00.260 --> 12:07.260]  They ruled the way we asked the court to rule in the trial court.
[12:07.260 --> 12:15.260]  We challenge subject matter jurisdiction to trial the court of appeals instead of granting our mandamus dismiss the case.
[12:15.260 --> 12:19.260]  You have a good chance at that here.
[12:19.260 --> 12:27.260]  The court of appeals is going to look at this and good chance they're going to say this thing's not going to go anywhere.
[12:27.260 --> 12:34.260]  So we can cut this off at the knees.
[12:34.260 --> 12:45.260]  Then the other thing, Fareed, which you may not remember him. You've talked to him. He's called in the show.
[12:45.260 --> 12:51.260]  He just texted me and told me he couldn't call in or he can't get through right now and he's asking me.
[12:51.260 --> 13:17.260]  The problem is a problem for a lot of people out here and it is when you're pushing in a default against the opposing council and these clerks out here refuse to give a default specifically to process.
[13:17.260 --> 13:27.260]  Okay, just call 9-1-1. If they're required to do that, just call 9-1-1.
[13:27.260 --> 13:32.260]  Does it get their attention?
[13:32.260 --> 13:39.260]  Right. I mean, I advise Fareed to have the clerk explain why.
[13:39.260 --> 13:51.260]  If there was any defect in his paperwork for the default, I said because then if she doesn't tell you there's a defect and she refuses, then you tell her, well, I want your refusal.
[13:51.260 --> 13:57.260]  So I try to get everything. I try to get evidence. I try to get everything in paper.
[13:57.260 --> 14:12.260]  This is why you call 9-1-1. Let the clerk explain to the police officer that shows up to answer your charge of official misconduct against the clerk. Let her explain to him.
[14:12.260 --> 14:23.260]  And you get this on the record. There's no more of this, he says, he said stuff. You bring in a third party.
[14:23.260 --> 14:30.260]  Now, the third party is going to do a little chicken dance trying to shield the clerk.
[14:30.260 --> 14:37.260]  But in the process, you create a record of this incident.
[14:37.260 --> 14:46.260]  I'm telling you, when I get called 9-1-1 on clerks, they get real excited.
[14:46.260 --> 14:57.260]  So if the clerk wants to take it upon herself, or if the judge has given her an order and she's following the judge's order, that'll work.
[14:57.260 --> 15:06.260]  Just throw that judge under the bus for us to keep yourself from being prosecuted. This terrifies clerks.
[15:06.260 --> 15:16.260]  I've told the story about Randall County on the air a number of times where the clerk wouldn't bring me the hard copy record she wanted to be looking at the computer.
[15:16.260 --> 15:23.260]  And I told her I needed to see the hard copy. She told me she didn't have time with the personnel I'd have to look at the computer.
[15:23.260 --> 15:32.260]  I call the bailiff over and ask the bailiff to arrest her. And when the bailiff refused, I call 9-1-1, ask for somebody to arrest the clerk and the bailiff.
[15:32.260 --> 15:38.260]  I say the bailiff's captain. Oh, it was great fun.
[15:38.260 --> 15:45.260]  But if you go to Randall County and ask to see the hard copy records, you're not going to get any crapola from the clerk.
[15:45.260 --> 15:49.260]  She's going to go get it. No argument.
[15:49.260 --> 15:52.260]  It sounds like they named that county after you.
[15:52.260 --> 15:58.260]  It kind of does, but they definitely don't want to see me out there anymore.
[15:58.260 --> 16:02.260]  They want to arrest them or real. But it works.
[16:02.260 --> 16:10.260]  Call 9-1-1 is great. They really don't see that coming.
[16:10.260 --> 16:19.260]  They don't expect that kind of thing. And all of a sudden you've involved a third party, a third agency.
[16:19.260 --> 16:24.260]  They see things getting really serious. They will fix this problem.
[16:24.260 --> 16:29.260]  The clerk has the authority to deny you access to the court. Let her prove it up.
[16:29.260 --> 16:38.260]  And to specify what you're calling 9-1-1-4 is to get a police officer to come make a police report. Is that correct?
[16:38.260 --> 16:43.260]  Yes. You don't expect a policeman to arrest her, but I need to memorialize this.
[16:43.260 --> 16:47.260]  And I will file official misconduct against her. It's a classic misdemeanor.
[16:47.260 --> 16:57.260]  Hang on. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue Lauderdale Radio. I call it number 5126461984, but our call boards fall.
[16:57.260 --> 17:00.260]  Hang on. We'll be right back.
[17:00.260 --> 17:04.260]  Rue Lauderdale Radio is proud to offer the Rue Lauderdale Traffic Seminar.
[17:04.260 --> 17:09.260]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society. If we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[17:09.260 --> 17:12.260]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[17:12.260 --> 17:17.260]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity,
[17:17.260 --> 17:19.260]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[17:19.260 --> 17:24.260]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[17:24.260 --> 17:30.260]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rue Lauderdale Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[17:30.260 --> 17:34.260]  that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law.
[17:34.260 --> 17:40.260]  You can get your own copy of this valuable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[17:40.260 --> 17:44.260]  Ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie,
[17:44.260 --> 17:49.260]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[17:49.260 --> 17:53.260]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[17:53.260 --> 17:58.260]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[18:00.260 --> 18:05.260]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even losses?
[18:05.260 --> 18:09.260]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[18:09.260 --> 18:14.260]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[18:14.260 --> 18:20.260]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute,
[18:20.260 --> 18:26.260]  what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls,
[18:26.260 --> 18:33.260]  how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.260 --> 18:38.260]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.260 --> 18:41.260]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.260 --> 18:49.260]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.260 --> 19:11.260]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:19.260 --> 19:24.260]  Look what we got.
[19:24.260 --> 19:27.260]  We ask for question.
[19:27.260 --> 19:29.260]  I wonder what's that?
[19:29.260 --> 19:32.260]  They don't have the answer.
[19:32.260 --> 19:34.260]  Open up.
[19:34.260 --> 19:37.260]  We ask for question.
[19:37.260 --> 19:39.260]  Look what we got.
[19:39.260 --> 19:42.260]  They don't have the answer.
[19:42.260 --> 19:44.260]  Soak and slip and slide.
[19:44.260 --> 19:51.260]  Okay, we are back.
[19:51.260 --> 19:56.260]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Ted in California.
[19:56.260 --> 20:01.260]  And Ted, I know I keep harping on this criminal thing.
[20:01.260 --> 20:09.260]  I keep harping on that because in my experience, I have found that it works very well.
[20:09.260 --> 20:16.260]  This week, I went to the county that I'm living in here in Tennessee.
[20:16.260 --> 20:25.260]  A week ago or two weeks ago, I went to the court and they wouldn't let me in the courtroom with my cell phone.
[20:25.260 --> 20:32.260]  And I told the bailiff that, oh, yeah, but I need this cell phone because I won't record the proceedings.
[20:32.260 --> 20:34.260]  Oh, you can't record the proceedings.
[20:34.260 --> 20:36.260]  I said, you know that's illegal.
[20:36.260 --> 20:38.260]  He said, yeah, I know that.
[20:38.260 --> 20:41.260]  But I have my orders.
[20:41.260 --> 20:47.260]  So I took my cell phone down to the car and I come back and they had locked the courtroom.
[20:47.260 --> 20:49.260]  Couldn't go in there.
[20:49.260 --> 20:51.260]  I said, are they here for your hearing in there?
[20:51.260 --> 20:53.260]  He said, well, yes, they are.
[20:53.260 --> 20:54.260]  Then I want to watch.
[20:54.260 --> 20:56.260]  I said, I can't let you in there.
[20:56.260 --> 20:59.260]  He said, okay, really, really good bailiff.
[20:59.260 --> 21:07.260]  He said he knew this was wrong, but he's got to follow the orders from the judge.
[21:07.260 --> 21:11.260]  So I went to the district attorney and filed criminal charges against him.
[21:11.260 --> 21:13.260]  Two of them.
[21:13.260 --> 21:20.260]  One for not letting me record the court proceedings and one for not letting me in the courtroom.
[21:20.260 --> 21:22.260]  I told him he was a great guy.
[21:22.260 --> 21:23.260]  He was smart.
[21:23.260 --> 21:24.260]  He was polite.
[21:24.260 --> 21:27.260]  He was professional.
[21:27.260 --> 21:30.260]  That's why I'm filing against him.
[21:30.260 --> 21:37.260]  Because no one will say that I have an axe to grind against this guy.
[21:37.260 --> 21:39.260]  He said, well, then why are you filing?
[21:39.260 --> 21:45.260]  I said, well, I want to use the district attorney as my crash dummy.
[21:45.260 --> 21:50.260]  I said, I really want to take on the city of Clarksville, which is middle Tennessee.
[21:50.260 --> 21:53.260]  But I want to know what all they're going to throw at me beforehand.
[21:53.260 --> 21:58.260]  So I'm going to use your boss as a crash dummy.
[21:58.260 --> 22:08.260]  So I'm laughing and joking with them and asking them to arrest the deputy for following the rules.
[22:08.260 --> 22:11.260]  It got real tense in there.
[22:11.260 --> 22:16.260]  They get real tense when you start filing criminal charges.
[22:16.260 --> 22:18.260]  It's technical.
[22:18.260 --> 22:19.260]  It's in law.
[22:19.260 --> 22:23.260]  They know it, but they don't like it.
[22:23.260 --> 22:28.260]  And here I've told the prosecutor that I'm using him as a test dummy.
[22:28.260 --> 22:39.260]  So clearly he knows I'm expecting him to screw things up so that I can do the same thing to him that I did to the bailiff.
[22:39.260 --> 22:45.260]  What I want the bailiff to do is throw the judge under the bus for me.
[22:45.260 --> 22:53.260]  Go ahead, make the claim that you have an affirmative defense of good faith romance,
[22:53.260 --> 22:59.260]  that you acted in accordance with the directive of the district judge.
[22:59.260 --> 23:01.260]  That'll work.
[23:01.260 --> 23:04.260]  Then I'll come back and file on the district judge.
[23:04.260 --> 23:17.260]  If you call 911 on the clerk one time, I guarantee you their whole perspective will change whenever they see you.
[23:17.260 --> 23:29.260]  Now I call them on the clerks and laugh and joke with the clerks while we're waiting for the police to come and arrest them.
[23:29.260 --> 23:38.260]  You're always pleasant, you're always upbeat, never angry, never threatening, never give them legal advice,
[23:38.260 --> 23:42.260]  and never let them be able to say you were agitated.
[23:42.260 --> 23:49.260]  Guys, I'm just following the thunder here, that's what I told the prosecutor once,
[23:49.260 --> 23:51.260]  that I'm just following the thunder.
[23:51.260 --> 23:54.260]  Don't blame me, I didn't write the codes.
[23:54.260 --> 23:59.260]  So that's my suggestion, if you guys are having trouble filing something,
[23:59.260 --> 24:08.260]  remember my rules, never ask a public official to do anything you actually want him to do.
[24:08.260 --> 24:16.260]  Because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law does not command him to do.
[24:16.260 --> 24:21.260]  And when he doesn't do it, bang, you get to hammer him.
[24:21.260 --> 24:26.260]  Okay, I kind of hijacked you again Ted, okay.
[24:26.260 --> 24:33.260]  What are we looking at now? We're looking at an appeal, an interlocutory appeal.
[24:33.260 --> 24:45.260]  I would suggest what may give the judges reason to give you a ruling if you clearly have a right to dismissal.
[24:45.260 --> 24:54.260]  The appellate court can dismiss. And if you ask them to force the judge to give you findings of fact,
[24:54.260 --> 24:57.260]  they are not going to want to do that.
[24:57.260 --> 25:03.260]  But it is your right. These judges rule however they want to.
[25:03.260 --> 25:11.260]  And when you ask them to support their rulings, they really don't want to do that because most of the time they can't.
[25:11.260 --> 25:15.260]  And the court appeals notice this, and they know the judges.
[25:15.260 --> 25:20.260]  Now they're not up there to beat up these judges, so they're not going to want to give the judge a hard time.
[25:20.260 --> 25:24.260]  So how do they bail the judge out of this?
[25:24.260 --> 25:35.260]  They can say, based on the record, you have an absolute right to dismissal and just dismiss the whole thing.
[25:35.260 --> 25:42.260]  It's politics, Ted. Give them some politics to work with.
[25:42.260 --> 25:44.260]  You're still there?
[25:44.260 --> 25:50.260]  Yes, and the fight, you're asking, I missed the first couple words.
[25:50.260 --> 25:58.260]  It's a finding in fact and conclusion of law, but you're asking the court to make an order?
[25:58.260 --> 26:11.260]  You're asking the court of appeals to issue a mandate ordering the trial court to provide you with findings of fact and conclusions of law
[26:11.260 --> 26:20.260]  because it is the primary duty of the trial court to determine the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence,
[26:20.260 --> 26:25.260]  then apply the laws that comes to him to the facts in the case.
[26:25.260 --> 26:35.260]  So you want to see how he did that because if he fails to properly apply the law to the facts,
[26:35.260 --> 26:43.260]  that is an abusive discretion which has the effect of denying you in the due course of the loss.
[26:43.260 --> 26:45.260]  That's a crime.
[26:45.260 --> 26:52.260]  Well, in Tim's case, we had already filed criminal charges against the judge
[26:52.260 --> 27:02.260]  for not providing findings of fact because Texas law specifically commanded it in the rules of civil procedure.
[27:02.260 --> 27:17.260]  So we accused the judge of violating a law relating to his office, or I'm sorry, of failing to perform a duty he was required to perform.
[27:17.260 --> 27:23.260]  Look at California law, look up findings of fact and conclusions of law, see what you find there.
[27:23.260 --> 27:25.260]  I think you'd be surprised.
[27:25.260 --> 27:28.260]  No, I understand it very well, Randy.
[27:28.260 --> 27:35.260]  I just missed a couple of the words and I wanted to have the words down exactly like you said.
[27:35.260 --> 27:37.260]  I understand what this is all about.
[27:37.260 --> 27:49.260]  I put it in the readings before when I put a motion in, in the prayer I put, you know, I want to find facts in conclusion of law on any decision.
[27:49.260 --> 27:51.260]  I put that in there.
[27:51.260 --> 27:53.260]  Okay, hold on.
[27:53.260 --> 28:06.260]  What does the rules of civil procedure in California say about the duty of the judge to provide findings of fact and conclusions of law?
[28:06.260 --> 28:08.260]  I'm going to look it up.
[28:08.260 --> 28:20.260]  Okay, because in Texas we have, I think it's 267 that says that you can request findings of fact within 10 days after a ruling,
[28:20.260 --> 28:29.260]  and the judge shall produce findings of fact and conclusions at law within 20 days.
[28:29.260 --> 28:34.260]  On the 21st day, TAM filed charges against the judge.
[28:34.260 --> 28:41.260]  And I have a good notion that when the court of appeals got the motion, they're looking at a brand new judge.
[28:41.260 --> 28:43.260]  It's just got an office.
[28:43.260 --> 28:45.260]  You asked for findings of fact.
[28:45.260 --> 28:46.260]  He don't produce it.
[28:46.260 --> 28:49.260]  You filed a criminal against him.
[28:49.260 --> 29:01.260]  Now they've got to find a way to bail this judge out because they looked at the ruling and they knew he could not come up with findings of fact that supported his position.
[29:01.260 --> 29:05.260]  And if he failed to do that, that would support our criminal charge against him.
[29:05.260 --> 29:12.260]  So they just dismissed the case on other grounds and didn't touch that part.
[29:12.260 --> 29:20.260]  Well then I'm going to file criminal charges on this judge because I'm on the record asking him for a finding of fact and conclusion of law.
[29:20.260 --> 29:24.260]  Make sure the rules require him to do that.
[29:24.260 --> 29:27.260]  I'm pretty sure our rules are the same as Texas on this.
[29:27.260 --> 29:34.260]  And I just got, what I said I'm going to look it up is so that I have it specifically to quote.
[29:34.260 --> 29:35.260]  Perfect.
[29:35.260 --> 29:36.260]  That's the way to do it.
[29:36.260 --> 29:37.260]  Hang on.
[29:37.260 --> 29:38.260]  About to go to break.
[29:38.260 --> 29:40.260]  Do you have anything else for us yet?
[29:40.260 --> 29:42.260]  No, I'll sign off.
[29:42.260 --> 29:43.260]  Okay.
[29:43.260 --> 29:44.260]  Thank you, Ted.
[29:44.260 --> 29:45.260]  Keep us up to date.
[29:45.260 --> 29:48.260]  Randy Kelsen, Deborah Stevens, rule of law radio.
[29:48.260 --> 29:52.260]  I'll call in number 512-646-1984.
[29:52.260 --> 29:54.260]  We should have a slot open in a moment.
[29:54.260 --> 29:56.260]  We'll be right back.
[29:56.260 --> 30:08.260]  Powerpoint is cracked into our lives and reached the level of near obsession in corporate America.
[30:08.260 --> 30:10.260]  Are we going overboard with it?
[30:10.260 --> 30:12.260]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[30:12.260 --> 30:15.260]  Back with a commentary on how PowerPoint erodes critical thinking.
[30:15.260 --> 30:16.260]  Next.
[30:16.260 --> 30:19.260]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:19.260 --> 30:22.260]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.260 --> 30:27.260]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.260 --> 30:29.260]  So protect your rights.
[30:29.260 --> 30:33.260]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:33.260 --> 30:34.260]  Privacy.
[30:34.260 --> 30:35.260]  It's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.260 --> 30:42.260]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.260 --> 30:46.260]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.260 --> 30:48.260]  We've all experienced it.
[30:48.260 --> 30:52.260]  Death by PowerPoint.
[30:52.260 --> 30:55.260]  Microsoft's presentation program has turned countless meetings into mind-numbing boredom.
[30:55.260 --> 30:56.260]  Got a product idea?
[30:56.260 --> 30:57.260]  Do a PowerPoint.
[30:57.260 --> 30:58.260]  Trouble in the battlefield?
[30:58.260 --> 30:59.260]  PowerPoint again.
[30:59.260 --> 31:00.260]  Ugg.
[31:00.260 --> 31:06.260]  Unless it's creatively spiffed up with lots of pictures, PowerPoint can be the death of a meeting.
[31:06.260 --> 31:12.260]  It relieves the lazy speaker from having to actually write a thoughtful speech or convey a persuasive argument.
[31:12.260 --> 31:16.260]  Too often, instead of analysis, we get mind-numbing bullet points.
[31:16.260 --> 31:19.260]  The key is never to put your speech up on the screen.
[31:19.260 --> 31:24.260]  Use lots of pictures and never, ever, never read from a slide.
[31:24.260 --> 31:31.260]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.260 --> 31:32.260]  I lost my son.
[31:32.260 --> 31:33.260]  My nephew.
[31:33.260 --> 31:34.260]  My uncle.
[31:34.260 --> 31:35.260]  My son.
[31:35.260 --> 31:36.260]  On September 11, 2001.
[31:36.260 --> 31:39.260]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[31:39.260 --> 31:43.260]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[31:43.260 --> 31:47.260]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7.
[31:47.260 --> 31:53.260]  Over 1,200 architects and engineers looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[31:53.260 --> 31:54.260]  Bring justice to my son.
[31:54.260 --> 31:55.260]  My uncle.
[31:55.260 --> 31:56.260]  My nephew.
[31:56.260 --> 31:57.260]  My son.
[31:57.260 --> 31:58.260]  Go to BuildingWhat.org.
[31:58.260 --> 32:01.260]  Why it fell, why it matters, is what you can do.
[32:01.260 --> 32:04.260]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[32:04.260 --> 32:06.260]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[32:06.260 --> 32:11.260]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[32:11.260 --> 32:15.260]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[32:15.260 --> 32:21.260]  That's why you have insurance and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[32:21.260 --> 32:27.260]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[32:27.260 --> 32:32.260]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[32:32.260 --> 32:41.260]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off.
[32:41.260 --> 32:46.260]  And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[32:46.260 --> 32:51.260]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[32:51.260 --> 32:57.260]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[32:57.260 --> 32:59.260]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[32:59.260 --> 33:02.260]  We're not actually kidding about chemtrails.
[33:29.260 --> 33:34.260]  Stop being an abuse at this point.
[33:34.260 --> 33:57.260]  When you're gonna stop abuse, you're gonna have a hard work.
[33:57.260 --> 34:07.260]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, and we're going to Tim in Texas. Hello, Tim.
[34:07.260 --> 34:09.260]  Hello, sir.
[34:09.260 --> 34:12.260]  What do you have for us today?
[34:12.260 --> 34:21.260]  Well, you know, in Rome on 287, the police will...
[34:21.260 --> 34:29.260]  Wait, wait, wait. For everybody out there, we're speaking to the old town of Yellow Dog, Texas.
[34:29.260 --> 34:39.260]  And I guess people with a lot of money moved in there and decided they didn't like the name Yellow Dog, so they changed it to Rome.
[34:39.260 --> 34:42.260]  Is that a cool fact or what?
[34:42.260 --> 34:49.260]  I live in Boyd, Texas, which is the next town down the road, and it used to be called Wisty Bend.
[34:49.260 --> 35:00.260]  There's a little bend in the river where the bootleggers used to be, so they called Boyd Wisty Bend.
[35:00.260 --> 35:06.260]  And now they changed it to more highfalutin' names. I like Wisty Bend and Yellow Dog better.
[35:06.260 --> 35:09.260]  Okay, go ahead, Tim.
[35:09.260 --> 35:21.260]  Well, today, you know, Thursday is the day that Laura takes the kids of the Decatur to after school to get the piano lessons, and so on their way back home, it's around 5.30.
[35:21.260 --> 35:26.260]  And that's pretty heavy traffic now on 287 there.
[35:26.260 --> 35:38.260]  So, you know, you're in the... you know, there's two lanes on the highway there, and I guess Rome probably has a mile or so of city limit on the highway.
[35:38.260 --> 35:45.260]  Hold on. He said two lanes. Actually, four lanes. It's a divided highway.
[35:45.260 --> 35:48.260]  Two on each side, yeah.
[35:48.260 --> 35:57.260]  So, she said she looked in the rearview mirror before the Newark exit, I guess, before you get to 114.
[35:57.260 --> 36:14.260]  And Rome Police was pulling her over. So, she pulled over, and he came up to the passenger window because of the traffic, and he got his insurance and driver's license and everything, and handed it to him.
[36:14.260 --> 36:22.260]  And she said, Mrs. Pixler... or he said, Mrs. Pixler, do you know why I'm called Jobber? She said, well, I don't think I was speeding.
[36:22.260 --> 36:40.260]  She said, no, you weren't. She says, but you were weaving in and out of traffic and falling too close, and these boys made you too bad talking about my two sons for you to get into an accident and, you know, cause them to be harmed.
[36:40.260 --> 36:54.260]  And so, she said, well, you know, we were just listening to they have what's called adventures in Odyssey, and they were listening to that. She said, I may have been falling too close, but I didn't.
[36:54.260 --> 36:59.260]  You know, I've written with my wife. She doesn't usually drive reckless.
[36:59.260 --> 37:25.260]  And so, I was thinking, isn't that kind of strange to be pulled over? Because within a... it's probably not even two miles, Randy. Maybe it is two miles total of the State Highway 287 that would, you know, make them or get them jurisdiction over.
[37:25.260 --> 37:31.260]  Okay. He said from the city limits to 114 would go right through the center of town.
[37:31.260 --> 37:32.260]  Yeah.
[37:32.260 --> 37:43.260]  So it's only two miles stretch where you could have saw. Yeah, I guess he could. If he was on the bypass entrance and hiding there, that's enough to see her. Did he write her a ticket?
[37:43.260 --> 37:46.260]  No, he didn't write her a ticket.
[37:46.260 --> 37:48.260]  Well, that's good.
[37:48.260 --> 37:49.260]  He didn't write it.
[37:49.260 --> 37:50.260]  Yeah.
[37:50.260 --> 37:53.260]  Maybe it's good. We could have had a lot of fun if he had.
[37:53.260 --> 38:06.260]  Oh, yeah. She doesn't run any trouble. She's already told me that. I said, good. Call Randy tonight. She's like, no, I'm not calling Randy. I don't want any trouble.
[38:06.260 --> 38:23.260]  But remember, I got a ticket near... I was going to Tim's to a city council meeting and I followed a sheriff's deputy into town and he turned off on the road that went to Tim's and I said, that looks suspicious. So I circled around, come in from the other direction.
[38:23.260 --> 38:35.260]  He was sitting there waiting on me, pulled me over and said, Mr. Kelton, I gave him my license. I always do. Do you know why I stopped you? I said, no, but I figured you're going to tell me.
[38:35.260 --> 38:40.260]  Well, your registration is expired.
[38:40.260 --> 38:45.260]  I said, only two years. What's the problem?
[38:45.260 --> 38:57.260]  He went to write a ticket. I called 911 and asked for a deputy to be sent to arrest him for first degree felony aggravated assault.
[38:57.260 --> 39:02.260]  Oh, that was great fun.
[39:02.260 --> 39:08.260]  When he came back with the ticket, he was not a happy camper.
[39:08.260 --> 39:14.260]  But anyway, they never would bring that. I couldn't get that brought to court.
[39:14.260 --> 39:18.260]  The county attorney refused to bring it to trial.
[39:18.260 --> 39:25.260]  And when the county attorney was running for office, I saw him in the courthouse. This was his first time running.
[39:25.260 --> 39:34.260]  I said, James Staten. I said, hello, James. Hello, Mr. Kelton. He said, you know, I'm running for office.
[39:34.260 --> 39:39.260]  Yeah, I heard that James. He said, now, I know about your radio show.
[39:39.260 --> 39:43.260]  And you remember, I know where you live.
[39:43.260 --> 39:47.260]  I went to school with your kids.
[39:47.260 --> 39:52.260]  Well, I couldn't get him to bring this to trial.
[39:52.260 --> 39:55.260]  I wanted to, but I couldn't get him to.
[39:55.260 --> 40:06.260]  He's the one that when the chief of police refused to give my complaints against someone to a local magistrate told me that James told him not to.
[40:06.260 --> 40:12.260]  I drove down to the county courthouse and James is waiting for me in the hall when I got there.
[40:12.260 --> 40:15.260]  And he said, Miss Kelton, I know why you're here.
[40:15.260 --> 40:28.260]  Do you think I have lost my professional mind? Do you really think I would waive my sovereign immunity by giving legal advice to the police department?
[40:28.260 --> 40:34.260]  I said, I didn't think so, James, but I'm just following the thunder here.
[40:34.260 --> 40:45.260]  I went back to the police department in Boyd, the town I live in, knocked on the door and this officer came the door. His name was Boyd.
[40:45.260 --> 40:51.260]  He said, well, how about Mr. Kelton? He's grinning from ear to ear. He knows what's happening.
[40:51.260 --> 41:03.260]  He said, what can I do for you? I said, James Staten just threw your chief under the bus and I'm here to run him over with it.
[41:03.260 --> 41:08.260]  He said, I'll let you in on one condition. I said, what's that? You let me watch.
[41:08.260 --> 41:13.260]  I said, watch. I need you to take videos.
[41:13.260 --> 41:21.260]  And when this sheriff's deputy is giving me that ticket, the same cop showed up and I think he told him who I was.
[41:21.260 --> 41:29.260]  So they won't write me anymore and if Laura used my documents on them, they wouldn't write her either.
[41:29.260 --> 41:33.260]  Okay, was that the only thing, Tim? That's it.
[41:33.260 --> 41:37.260]  They hadn't heard anything from the court of appeals.
[41:37.260 --> 41:47.260]  Not yet. No, they probably, you know, they got to the 15th to file their paperwork.
[41:47.260 --> 42:02.260]  It ought to be interesting to see what they filed because this was a situation where the city, after the court ruled against Tim in everything out of hand,
[42:02.260 --> 42:11.260]  when the city found out what kind of shenanigans their lawyers were pulling, they dismissed everything. They non-suited.
[42:11.260 --> 42:17.260]  They were already in the court of appeals and they non-suited.
[42:17.260 --> 42:27.260]  They were mortified and then the lawyers just couldn't stop with their shenanigans.
[42:27.260 --> 42:42.260]  And the Texas Municipal League lawyer, the Municipal League is the agency that bonds all of the municipalities and provides their intermissions policies.
[42:42.260 --> 42:49.260]  That lawyer filed an action, a motion with the court to dismiss the appeal.
[42:49.260 --> 43:05.260]  And in our response, the first thing we put was we challenged the standing of the Municipal League attorney to file an action in the court
[43:05.260 --> 43:13.260]  because they weren't the city's lawyers. They were a lawyer for the insurance company.
[43:13.260 --> 43:22.260]  And we had not sued the city for damages. We sued the city for declaratory judgment.
[43:22.260 --> 43:31.260]  We sued individuals for damage but alleged that they acted in their personal capacity.
[43:31.260 --> 43:43.260]  So until it was determined that they were not acting in their personal capacity but had a right to immunity, we claimed that the Municipal League had no standing.
[43:43.260 --> 43:47.260]  And the motion they filed was really stupid.
[43:47.260 --> 43:52.260]  So it'll be interesting to see what they filed to cover our response.
[43:52.260 --> 43:56.260]  Okay, thank you Tim. Now we're going to break Randy Kelton.
[43:56.260 --> 44:01.260]  With these rules on radio, we'll be right back.
[44:27.260 --> 44:32.260]  In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burks.
[44:32.260 --> 44:39.260]  We also offer one-world-way mountain house storeable foods, burkey water products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[44:39.260 --> 44:43.260]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept big coins as payment.
[44:43.260 --> 44:46.260]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[44:46.260 --> 44:51.260]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, sweet A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[44:51.260 --> 44:54.260]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[44:54.260 --> 45:00.260]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[45:00.260 --> 45:04.260]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.260 --> 45:07.260]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[45:07.260 --> 45:15.260]  The affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.260 --> 45:19.260]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.260 --> 45:23.260]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.260 --> 45:28.260]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.260 --> 45:34.260]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.260 --> 45:43.260]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.260 --> 45:52.260]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[45:52.260 --> 46:02.260]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:22.260 --> 46:31.260]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[46:31.260 --> 46:42.260]  If you're not in a lawsuit, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[46:42.260 --> 46:56.420]  Okay, we are back.
[46:56.420 --> 47:03.260]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to Tina in California.
[47:03.260 --> 47:04.260]  Hello Tina.
[47:04.260 --> 47:05.260]  Hello.
[47:05.260 --> 47:07.540]  How are you?
[47:07.540 --> 47:08.540]  I am good.
[47:08.540 --> 47:11.540]  What do you have for us today?
[47:11.540 --> 47:18.220]  Well, I've been getting a little frustrated, you know, that declaratory judgment and trying
[47:18.220 --> 47:21.300]  to find out that we finished this week.
[47:21.300 --> 47:30.220]  I can see why people give up on fighting lawsuits because, A, it's very expensive unless
[47:30.220 --> 47:38.940]  you are granted informal proper status, and it's extremely frustrating.
[47:38.940 --> 47:46.260]  I have been to the courthouse three times to try to file this, and, you know, the clerks
[47:46.260 --> 47:50.700]  won't give you legal advice, won't tell you what forms you need to put with it, but you
[47:50.700 --> 47:51.700]  need some forms.
[47:51.700 --> 47:53.700]  We can't file it like this.
[47:53.700 --> 47:56.700]  Go to the law side, please.
[47:56.700 --> 48:03.700]  Okay, have you signed up for electronic filing?
[48:03.700 --> 48:04.700]  No.
[48:04.700 --> 48:10.300]  Do that.
[48:10.300 --> 48:19.660]  That first off will save you a lot, and if you do it electronically, then when the clerk
[48:19.660 --> 48:29.220]  refuses to accept it, she will send you a letter essentially telling you what's wrong.
[48:29.220 --> 48:30.220]  Okay.
[48:30.220 --> 48:39.820]  There are some formatting issues, and there's a special way to do the electronic signing.
[48:39.820 --> 48:40.820]  We can show you that.
[48:40.820 --> 48:46.860]  Actually, I could get you to talk to Laura, since she's been through these trenches.
[48:46.860 --> 48:52.220]  We file the documents as PDFs, as reduced size PDFs.
[48:52.220 --> 48:59.140]  There's a few requirements, but it makes your life a whole lot easier, and if you'll call
[48:59.140 --> 49:04.820]  me in the morning, I'm getting a little more time now.
[49:04.820 --> 49:11.740]  I had someone in Georgia I was helping, and the city was coming after him, and we filed
[49:11.740 --> 49:23.140]  a subject matter jurisdiction challenge and motion to dismiss for a more definite statement,
[49:23.140 --> 49:25.140]  and the city dismissed everything.
[49:25.140 --> 49:26.140]  Yeah.
[49:26.140 --> 49:34.540]  When they found out he was going to fight back, they ducked and run for cover, so that
[49:34.540 --> 49:36.540]  got bought me a little time.
[49:36.540 --> 49:42.620]  If you'll call me in the morning, I will go through that disclosure adjustment suit.
[49:42.620 --> 49:47.220]  Will you be able to help me with the proof of service summons, because I cannot get any
[49:47.220 --> 49:50.420]  of the clerks or the people that don't know library?
[49:50.420 --> 49:52.620]  I've got one of those.
[49:52.620 --> 49:54.540]  I should be one on it.
[49:54.540 --> 49:58.340]  It's pretty straightforward how you do that one.
[49:58.340 --> 50:02.020]  If you sign up for electronic filing, then you don't have to worry about that.
[50:02.020 --> 50:04.020]  The clerks are for everybody.
[50:04.020 --> 50:07.620]  The clerks of, oh, okay, because that would be good.
[50:07.620 --> 50:14.020]  Now, one question, I'm looking at this again and again, and I'm really glad I didn't file
[50:14.020 --> 50:20.060]  it the other day when I thought, because I missed a critical exhibit out, should I be,
[50:20.060 --> 50:27.540]  and I know you've talked about doing the attorneys before, and it's kind of fun, because with
[50:27.540 --> 50:33.540]  this declaratory judgment about the note, the attorney in one of the letters that is
[50:33.540 --> 50:41.820]  an exhibit actually said, we will send you the original note, and then later he said,
[50:41.820 --> 50:47.380]  well, we're not sending it to after the proceedings, the court case is finished because it's improper
[50:47.380 --> 50:52.020]  discovery, which it isn't, and they've still never sent it.
[50:52.020 --> 51:00.060]  Should I be adding him as well as sending this to CIT, which is the banking question?
[51:00.060 --> 51:06.260]  No, I don't know who he is, and I don't know how he's related.
[51:06.260 --> 51:11.180]  You're speaking to adding him as a respondent?
[51:11.180 --> 51:13.460]  As a respondent.
[51:13.460 --> 51:24.940]  It wouldn't hurt because, well, does he have a dog in the hunt?
[51:24.940 --> 51:31.460]  Is he a lawyer for one of the people that have, or for the entity that's required to
[51:31.460 --> 51:33.460]  send you the document?
[51:33.460 --> 51:34.460]  Yes.
[51:34.460 --> 51:35.460]  Yes.
[51:35.460 --> 51:37.460]  Then yes, name him.
[51:37.460 --> 51:38.460]  Okay.
[51:38.460 --> 51:43.780]  I thought about that after, and I thought, you know, it might be good to name him and
[51:43.780 --> 51:51.100]  through him directly, because he has stated, we will send you the note, and then he refused
[51:51.100 --> 51:53.580]  because he said it's improper discovery.
[51:53.580 --> 51:59.100]  Well, it's not discovery at all, and probably I mean, I'm entitled to it.
[51:59.100 --> 52:06.220]  Then that's a good declaratory judgment question to ask.
[52:06.220 --> 52:18.060]  Does the requirement to provide the note become discovery simply because there is a civil
[52:18.060 --> 52:23.100]  action concerning the note?
[52:23.100 --> 52:27.380]  Does the, I'm writing this down, does the requirement to produce the note?
[52:27.380 --> 52:29.980]  Let me do a little explaining.
[52:29.980 --> 52:39.500]  If you have a right to public records, but if you're on a lawsuit in Texas, and I suspect
[52:39.500 --> 52:46.300]  in other states, you're, when you get into a lawsuit, your right to public records is
[52:46.300 --> 52:54.340]  curtailed to the degree that those records could be a part of discovery.
[52:54.340 --> 53:03.420]  The rationale is, is that the courts do not want discovery supplanted by the Open Records
[53:03.420 --> 53:04.420]  Act.
[53:04.420 --> 53:10.620]  Now, it's an annoying and seemingly unnecessary rule, but it is there.
[53:10.620 --> 53:17.220]  So you may have something in California similar.
[53:17.220 --> 53:21.460]  He said it was the rules of civil procedure it was in, and I complimented it.
[53:21.460 --> 53:23.820]  Did he name the rule of civil procedure?
[53:23.820 --> 53:24.820]  No.
[53:24.820 --> 53:34.660]  Then when he said rules of civil procedure, that was blah, blah, blah, met nothing, unless
[53:34.660 --> 53:44.740]  you can find it, look for discovery, trying to think of how to look this up.
[53:44.740 --> 53:58.020]  This is a statutory and contractual right, can discovery supplant a contractual or statutory
[53:58.020 --> 53:59.020]  right?
[53:59.020 --> 54:00.020]  Okay.
[54:00.020 --> 54:05.860]  I don't think so, and that's a good question to ask the judge.
[54:05.860 --> 54:06.860]  Okay.
[54:06.860 --> 54:11.900]  Do you ask it in the papers or ask it when you go in front of the judge?
[54:11.900 --> 54:13.620]  You ask it in the paperwork.
[54:13.620 --> 54:15.660]  You don't ever want to get in front of the judge.
[54:15.660 --> 54:19.700]  If you file this in the Feds, they don't ever want to see you.
[54:19.700 --> 54:22.860]  They want to do everything on the paperwork.
[54:22.860 --> 54:24.220]  Yeah.
[54:24.220 --> 54:30.420]  So you ask them for a ruling on the documentation.
[54:30.420 --> 54:34.300]  Everything you want must be in there.
[54:34.300 --> 54:39.500]  Once you get to court, if you're standing in front of them, you can't ask them for anything
[54:39.500 --> 54:44.300]  that wasn't in the paperwork, because the other side is going to cry foul.
[54:44.300 --> 54:53.220]  They're going to cry, just don't surprise that they had a right to notice and you had
[54:53.220 --> 54:56.220]  a duty to give notice, and the notice had to be in the pleading.
[54:56.220 --> 55:02.500]  So you can't come in here today and ask for something right now without giving us opportunity
[55:02.500 --> 55:06.740]  to research whether or not we have to give it to you.
[55:06.740 --> 55:09.900]  So everything in the pleading, you don't ever want to get in front of the court.
[55:09.900 --> 55:10.900]  The court does not.
[55:10.900 --> 55:11.900]  Everyone will see you.
[55:11.900 --> 55:15.980]  I have filed a whole stack of federal lawsuits.
[55:15.980 --> 55:21.620]  Never, ever have I been to federal court, except when I'm going down there to annoy
[55:21.620 --> 55:22.620]  them.
[55:22.620 --> 55:32.700]  Well, this is good, and then I need to rewrite and revise this a little bit, and add that
[55:32.700 --> 55:40.260]  because, you know, I just cannot find it in this, you know, civil procedure, and as you
[55:40.260 --> 55:46.980]  said, the statutory, the discovery, the plan to statutory right, that's a very good way
[55:46.980 --> 55:47.980]  to ask them.
[55:47.980 --> 55:51.620]  I'll try to rewrite it and ask you tomorrow morning about this.
[55:51.620 --> 55:57.900]  I was also told for people, I don't know if this affects every state, but it'll affect
[55:57.900 --> 56:05.260]  Ted and one of the more friendly clerks, it was really, really nice the second time I
[56:05.260 --> 56:10.780]  went and she gave me advice that all the others said were not allowed to give.
[56:10.780 --> 56:12.860]  But she was telling me about the service.
[56:12.860 --> 56:21.940]  I said, oh, how can I be served a notice by regular mail that is an important court case
[56:21.940 --> 56:26.820]  where if I don't see it, know about it, I can't be there.
[56:26.820 --> 56:37.380]  And I have to serve personally or I have to get someone else to serve it by a certified
[56:37.380 --> 56:38.380]  mail.
[56:38.380 --> 56:41.380]  I'm not allowed to serve it myself because I'm a party to the pleading.
[56:41.380 --> 56:51.820]  Oh, wait, you can serve, if you are a plaintiff, if you are a party and you're not represented
[56:51.820 --> 56:54.940]  by counsel, you can serve by certified mail.
[56:54.940 --> 57:01.020]  This is a few years ago, used to have to have a process server service and they changed
[57:01.020 --> 57:04.740]  the rules so you can serve by certified mail.
[57:04.740 --> 57:07.060]  They all told me I could not.
[57:07.060 --> 57:12.060]  I have helped file over 700 lawsuits.
[57:12.060 --> 57:17.620]  Never ever was that an issue.
[57:17.620 --> 57:26.140]  There's one time I did that and I served them by FedEx with a signature required and they
[57:26.140 --> 57:30.020]  said they were not properly served so they weren't going to answer.
[57:30.020 --> 57:38.860]  It is, that's, I don't care what they say, the judge says and the courts have said that
[57:38.860 --> 57:46.380]  a common carrier is trusted by the court.
[57:46.380 --> 57:57.060]  The U.S. mail is the one that's unquestionable, but UPS and FedEx and these other major carriers
[57:57.060 --> 57:59.940]  are all accepted by the court.
[57:59.940 --> 58:12.500]  The lawyers, you don't care what they say, but I always use the U.S. mail, you have better
[58:12.500 --> 58:14.780]  arguments with the U.S. mail.
[58:14.780 --> 58:22.820]  We just made an argument where someone mailed a document to the court and the U.S. mail
[58:22.820 --> 58:31.500]  took eight days to get it there and they denied a repeal because you didn't get it in time.
[58:31.500 --> 58:38.780]  So I'll have to go back and look at the research, but there's a special contractual requirement
[58:38.780 --> 58:43.660]  on the part of the U.S. mail that you can hold them to.
[58:43.660 --> 58:50.420]  Going on, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, we'll be right back.
[58:50.420 --> 58:55.860]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[58:55.860 --> 58:58.660]  because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.660 --> 59:04.060]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:04.060 --> 59:07.300]  the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:07.300 --> 59:09.060]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.060 --> 59:14.980]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:14.980 --> 59:18.700]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.700 --> 59:23.700]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance
[59:23.700 --> 59:28.420]  into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.420 --> 59:33.580]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.580 --> 59:43.980]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.980 --> 59:48.060]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.060 --> 59:50.060]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.060 --> 01:00:00.820]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.820 --> 01:00:05.860]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns, providing the jelly
[01:00:05.860 --> 01:00:13.620]  bulletins for the Commodities Market, Today in History, News Updates, and the Inside Scoot
[01:00:13.620 --> 01:00:21.380]  into the Tides of the Alternative.
[01:00:21.380 --> 01:00:29.220]  Markets for Wazeva 6th of February 2019 open with gold at $1,313.70 an ounce, silver $15.77
[01:00:29.220 --> 01:00:36.660]  an ounce, copper $2.83 an ounce, oil, Texas Crude $3.66 a barrel, Brent Crude $61.98
[01:00:36.660 --> 01:00:43.460]  an ounce, and cryptos in order of market capitalization, Bitcoin $3,401.64, Ripple
[01:00:43.460 --> 01:00:52.460]  XRP $0.29, Ethereum $10.10 and Eos is at $2.32 a crypto coin.
[01:00:52.460 --> 01:00:59.740]  Today in History, the year 1918, British women over the age of 30 who meet minimum property
[01:00:59.740 --> 01:01:04.660]  qualifications get the right to vote when the Representation of the People Act of 1918
[01:01:04.660 --> 01:01:06.100]  was passed by parliament.
[01:01:06.100 --> 01:01:12.980]  Today in History, and recent news, several Texas-based organizations found a lawsuit
[01:01:12.980 --> 01:01:17.500]  today requesting that a federal court stop the state from flagging about 95,000 people
[01:01:17.500 --> 01:01:19.940]  as potentially illegally registered to vote.
[01:01:19.940 --> 01:01:24.780]  The list was compiled after an 11-month-long investigation by the Office of the Texas Secretary
[01:01:24.780 --> 01:01:30.100]  of State and the Texas Department of Public Safety which sought to identify non-U.S. citizens
[01:01:30.100 --> 01:01:32.500]  who were registered to vote when obtaining H.R.
[01:01:32.500 --> 01:01:33.500]  license.
[01:01:33.500 --> 01:01:37.140]  Over half of the 95,000 did indeed vote, it seems.
[01:01:37.140 --> 01:01:41.220]  However, further controversy was raised when it became clear that some of the names were
[01:01:41.220 --> 01:01:45.780]  not in fact belonging to those who were non-citizens and registered.
[01:01:45.780 --> 01:01:49.900]  Apparently around 25% of all Latino immigrants become naturalized, gaining the right to
[01:01:49.900 --> 01:01:50.900]  vote.
[01:01:50.900 --> 01:01:55.340]  Registered voters who receive letters querying their citizenship have 30 days to respond
[01:01:55.340 --> 01:01:57.180]  with proof of eligibility.
[01:01:57.180 --> 01:02:01.340]  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and David Whitley, the Texas Secretary of State, have
[01:02:01.340 --> 01:02:09.100]  yet to officially comment regarding this list and any updates pertaining to it.
[01:02:09.100 --> 01:02:13.820]  A Texas man of only 24 years old, William Brown, died from a severed artery in his
[01:02:13.820 --> 01:02:16.860]  neck after a vape pen exploded while he was using it.
[01:02:16.860 --> 01:02:20.780]  It apparently happened in the parking lot of the vape shop where he got it.
[01:02:20.780 --> 01:02:24.380]  An X-ray revealed that a piece of metal was embedded in his brainstem.
[01:02:24.380 --> 01:02:30.580]  The vape store, Smoke and Vape-DZ, has refused to comment.
[01:02:30.580 --> 01:02:35.340]  First edition anchorwoman, Kristen Diaz interviewed Aislin Campbell, the executive director of
[01:02:35.340 --> 01:02:40.300]  Grow Local, South Texas, concerning the upcoming Texas Organic Farmers and Gardeners Association
[01:02:40.300 --> 01:02:45.260]  conference which will be taking place at the Corpus Christi Omni Hotel from February 14th
[01:02:45.260 --> 01:02:47.580]  to 16th, 6 to 9 p.m.
[01:02:47.580 --> 01:02:51.580]  You can find the interview at kiitv.com.
[01:02:51.580 --> 01:03:19.580]  This is Rick Brody with your lowdown for February 6th, 2019.
[01:03:19.580 --> 01:03:43.360]  Thank you!
[01:03:49.580 --> 01:04:04.340]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debra Stephens, Rue Leval Radio, and we're talking to Tina
[01:04:04.340 --> 01:04:13.180]  in California, and I found her on the break. The post office, unlike UPS or FedEx or any
[01:04:13.180 --> 01:04:22.500]  of those, has a universal service obligation. You have a right to a reasonable expectation
[01:04:22.500 --> 01:04:28.420]  of good faith and fair dealing from the United States government when this I'm reading from
[01:04:28.420 --> 01:04:34.700]  a Supreme Court search, so it has a relate or when we later use the United States Postal
[01:04:34.700 --> 01:04:40.300]  Service instead of one of its competitors. Competitors, as the United States Postal Service
[01:04:40.300 --> 01:04:48.100]  is bound under its universal service obligation. In the instant case, the United States Postal
[01:04:48.100 --> 01:04:55.940]  Service failed to provide the service we later paid for, and a strict enforcement of the mailbox
[01:04:55.940 --> 01:05:00.460]  rule in this instance would implicate the United States Postal Service and the loss
[01:05:00.460 --> 01:05:06.780]  incurred by realtor. What we're saying is, since the United States Postal Service, unlike
[01:05:06.780 --> 01:05:13.780]  everybody else, has a universal service obligation, that if they cause the problem, should be
[01:05:13.780 --> 01:05:22.260]  able to sue them. So we're giving the Supreme a reason to pick this up and change the mailbox
[01:05:22.260 --> 01:05:32.140]  rule. Okay, but point is, you have leverage with the post office. The courts say we trust
[01:05:32.140 --> 01:05:41.140]  the U.S. Postal Service, and what normally what a server does is they send one copy regular
[01:05:41.140 --> 01:05:52.940]  mail, one copy certified mail. The courts have said the Postal Service may screw up once,
[01:05:52.940 --> 01:05:59.620]  but they will not screw up twice. So they will presume you got it whether you admit
[01:05:59.620 --> 01:06:07.060]  that you did or not. That is a problem, but if you sign up for e-filing, that problem
[01:06:07.060 --> 01:06:08.560]  goes away.
[01:06:08.560 --> 01:06:16.980]  Miranda, remember, I am the person that they use the mailbox rule again when I submitted
[01:06:16.980 --> 01:06:23.340]  a small amount of gravy into court that I did not receive the motion for the extraordinary
[01:06:23.340 --> 01:06:29.660]  relief hearing, so they could take myself to their bankruptcy protection, and the court
[01:06:29.660 --> 01:06:35.020]  said, tough luck, you are deemed to have received it because they put it in the first
[01:06:35.020 --> 01:06:41.060]  class mail. They did not send it certified. They only put it in the first class mail.
[01:06:41.060 --> 01:06:47.700]  Okay, hold on. Did they get a tracking record from the Postal Service to show that it had
[01:06:47.700 --> 01:06:48.700]  been delivered?
[01:06:48.700 --> 01:06:57.140]  No, all they got was the stamped, rubber stamped proof of service by their low level employee
[01:06:57.140 --> 01:07:05.860]  at this attorney's office, and the court would not hear me at all. They just said, we are
[01:07:05.860 --> 01:07:10.940]  invoking the mailbox rule. You are deemed to have received it because it was sent to
[01:07:10.940 --> 01:07:19.020]  your residence, even though the bank and this attorney's office had my correct hearing
[01:07:19.020 --> 01:07:20.020]  report.
[01:07:20.020 --> 01:07:30.060]  Do you have to look at the case law in California? It may be in case law that if there is an
[01:07:30.060 --> 01:07:40.900]  issue about a residence that the party can rely on the residence as an address.
[01:07:40.900 --> 01:07:50.300]  Not in the note, it says in your actual mortgage note, they can send everything to the address
[01:07:50.300 --> 01:07:56.700]  unless you notify them in writing of a different address, and they had been notified in writing.
[01:07:56.700 --> 01:08:02.580]  Okay, wait a minute. You are doing, okay, this part I get, and we can hash this around.
[01:08:02.580 --> 01:08:11.100]  The courts are corrupt. They are just corrupt, especially in California. They do not care
[01:08:11.100 --> 01:08:16.700]  what the law is, and that's why I'm trying to get Ted to file criminally. That's why
[01:08:16.700 --> 01:08:22.060]  you should file criminally against the judge for failing to properly apply the law to the
[01:08:22.060 --> 01:08:31.580]  facts and deny you a due process. We haven't been taking him on criminally. He puts marks
[01:08:31.580 --> 01:08:41.980]  on their chart. It puts marks on their record that never goes away. They are criminals. In
[01:08:41.980 --> 01:08:51.500]  my opinion, they are bought and paid for. Okay, maybe they're not, but it moves you to conduct
[01:08:51.500 --> 01:08:57.100]  yourself as if they are, and assume that they're always going to rule against you out of hand
[01:08:57.100 --> 01:09:04.060]  at every turn, no matter what. In California, if you're pro-save, that seems to be consistently
[01:09:04.060 --> 01:09:12.420]  the case. It's consistently the case in Texas as well, but somewhat worse in California.
[01:09:12.420 --> 01:09:23.060]  The only real remedy I can find to that is using the criminal side, because that's not
[01:09:23.060 --> 01:09:30.300]  something they have control over. I will send me an email asking for an introduction to
[01:09:30.300 --> 01:09:39.340]  Deborah, and I will forward the email to her. I will file criminal charges against all six
[01:09:39.340 --> 01:09:43.740]  judges that I need to go against, if I had the time or could find someone to help me
[01:09:43.740 --> 01:09:49.220]  write them, so I could pay them. Just wondering the clerk, the frenzy clerk at the court,
[01:09:49.220 --> 01:09:57.740]  said there are different rules for individuals to serve, and there are for corporation, bank,
[01:09:57.740 --> 01:10:04.420]  and attorney problems. Okay, do not make those kinds of vague and general
[01:10:04.420 --> 01:10:15.860]  accusations. That's an accusation. Unless you can find actual law. If they are not following
[01:10:15.860 --> 01:10:24.220]  the set of rules you can find, and you believe they have another set of rules for these corporations
[01:10:24.220 --> 01:10:32.700]  and banks, it's okay for you to believe that. But if you can't show and prove it, you can
[01:10:32.700 --> 01:10:39.060]  make the accusation, but it will go nowhere. What you can do is presume that the codes
[01:10:39.060 --> 01:10:48.740]  you can find are binding, and when a judge fails to properly apply the law to the facts,
[01:10:48.740 --> 01:10:57.900]  that's a crime in every state. It's a denial of due process, and it's of course a misdemeanor.
[01:10:57.900 --> 01:11:03.140]  The judge says, you don't like my rule, you can always appeal it. And I'm saying, yeah,
[01:11:03.140 --> 01:11:08.500]  I can. I can appeal to the court of appeals, or I can appeal to a grand jury. We need to
[01:11:08.500 --> 01:11:15.860]  start doing that. Grand jury is not something they can control. If you file a habeas corpus
[01:11:15.860 --> 01:11:22.020]  with the court of criminal appeals in Texas, they will not ask you for a motion for leave
[01:11:22.020 --> 01:11:27.740]  to file. Now they used to do that, and they would deny the motion out of hand. That's
[01:11:27.740 --> 01:11:34.660]  exactly what they did with me. I took them straight to the grand jury. Grand jury, no
[01:11:34.660 --> 01:11:41.220]  bill them. But the grand jury got their complaints first day in office and held them for three
[01:11:41.220 --> 01:11:46.900]  months to the last day in office before they no billed. And the judges were all looking
[01:11:46.900 --> 01:11:52.140]  at being removed from office, and they had a prosecutor who they knew wanted them removed
[01:11:52.140 --> 01:12:01.700]  from office. So they spent three months wondering if their career was going to end. If you file
[01:12:01.700 --> 01:12:07.220]  a habeas in Texas now, the court of criminal appeals, you won't get that motion for leave
[01:12:07.220 --> 01:12:13.980]  to file nonsense. They cut that out. This does have a powerful effect. Criminal charges
[01:12:13.980 --> 01:12:19.820]  have a powerful effect. They never tell you that it has a powerful effect. They'll do
[01:12:19.820 --> 01:12:26.340]  everything they can to get you to think that it has no effect. The more they try to hide
[01:12:26.340 --> 01:12:33.940]  it, the more it tells you, this is powerful. I can assure you. You start filing criminal
[01:12:33.940 --> 01:12:39.020]  against these guys. You get everybody running around like chickens with their heads cut
[01:12:39.020 --> 01:12:45.620]  off. If we're going to get a change, this is how we're going to do it. I know I sound
[01:12:45.620 --> 01:12:54.980]  like I'm harping on this, but until you need to build a WECO case, you don't have to file
[01:12:54.980 --> 01:13:04.260]  a WECO. But show how this is a consistent pattern, how the judges consistently rule
[01:13:04.260 --> 01:13:12.580]  against the process. Whether that's true or not, it makes an ugly story. At the end of
[01:13:12.580 --> 01:13:24.980]  the day, perception is everything. If you are able to touch a nerve, especially a social
[01:13:24.980 --> 01:13:34.580]  media nerve, maybe put together a little YouTube video on how corrupt the courts are and how
[01:13:34.580 --> 01:13:42.220]  they steal and cheat from everybody. One of those to go viral, everybody pays attention
[01:13:42.220 --> 01:13:49.180]  to it, because it's all about perception. You start filing criminal charges against
[01:13:49.180 --> 01:13:55.980]  these guys, and then you start publicizing that. We get other people to pick it up.
[01:13:55.980 --> 01:14:03.580]  There's got a lot of people out there that are upset and are looking for a remedy. From
[01:14:03.580 --> 01:14:09.340]  the public official side, they're going to hide this remedy as much as possible. They
[01:14:09.340 --> 01:14:19.220]  absolutely do not want you to know it's here. If Ted had been filing criminal charges from
[01:14:19.220 --> 01:14:26.300]  the first day, good chance this wouldn't have gone this long. He's got a prosecutor who
[01:14:26.300 --> 01:14:32.340]  was trying to help a buddy and got himself in a spot. He got a hold of Ted Scarlett
[01:14:32.340 --> 01:14:40.740]  and stood as somebody who was terrified of him. Ted Scarlett's not letting him go. Good
[01:14:40.740 --> 01:14:48.060]  chance he's about to win the whole thing. If he started filing criminal charges quicker,
[01:14:48.060 --> 01:14:54.220]  good chance this would have been gone already. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[01:14:54.220 --> 01:15:02.660]  I'll let you go to someone else and I'll go into the listening mode. Send me that email.
[01:15:02.660 --> 01:15:07.420]  We'll talk in the morning and I'll send that email to Deborah. Maybe I can get her on the
[01:15:07.420 --> 01:15:11.580]  call tomorrow. Okay. Thanks, Mike. Thank you so much.
[01:15:11.580 --> 01:15:21.860]  Okay. Bye. Okay. Now we're going to John in New York. Hello, John. What do you have for
[01:15:21.860 --> 01:15:26.580]  us today? Oh, hi. Hi, Randy. How are you?
[01:15:26.580 --> 01:15:33.660]  I'm good. I just have a quick question and I mean a quick one. I heard you say earlier
[01:15:33.660 --> 01:15:40.460]  that something about taking cell phones into court. Now in my city, they don't allow you
[01:15:40.460 --> 01:15:45.180]  to take a cell phone into court and I think if I'm not mistaken, they don't allow any
[01:15:45.180 --> 01:15:55.300]  recording devices either. Now tell me the legality of that. Okay. 9-1-1, it is not legal. Most
[01:15:55.300 --> 01:16:05.420]  every circuit now has ruled that the public has a right to record their public officials
[01:16:05.420 --> 01:16:13.060]  in the performance of their duty. In Texas, it was one of the last and the Fifth Circuit
[01:16:13.060 --> 01:16:22.020]  ruled and turned a driver. A guy standing across from the Fort Worth Police Department
[01:16:22.020 --> 01:16:28.700]  videotaping and a lieutenant driver, a couple of policemen come out there to stop him. A
[01:16:28.700 --> 01:16:34.860]  lieutenant driver showed up and they threw him in the car in a 100 degree heat and with
[01:16:34.860 --> 01:16:40.340]  the heater off and left him in there an hour and a half and then they let him go. They
[01:16:40.340 --> 01:16:46.500]  gave him a little attitude adjustment. At least they thought they did. That did not
[01:16:46.500 --> 01:16:51.820]  work out so well for him because they created the issue that he could take to court and
[01:16:51.820 --> 01:17:00.940]  this is exactly why he was there. Turner set him up and took him to court. Are you being
[01:17:00.940 --> 01:17:06.300]  harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors
[01:17:06.300 --> 01:17:11.380]  now with the Michael Meares proven method. Michael Meares has won six cases in federal
[01:17:11.380 --> 01:17:16.340]  court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step by step instructions
[01:17:16.340 --> 01:17:21.260]  in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. What to do
[01:17:21.260 --> 01:17:26.620]  when contacted by phones, mail or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls? How
[01:17:26.620 --> 01:17:30.780]  to get debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the financial tables on
[01:17:30.780 --> 01:17:36.700]  them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Meares proven method is the solution
[01:17:36.700 --> 01:17:41.380]  for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well. For more
[01:17:41.380 --> 01:17:46.660]  information please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meares banner
[01:17:46.660 --> 01:17:56.060]  or email Michael Meares at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[01:17:56.060 --> 01:18:03.060]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:18:26.060 --> 01:18:33.060]  The Michael Meares proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:56.060 --> 01:19:03.060]  The Michael Meares proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:19:26.060 --> 01:19:51.060]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Deborah Steeves, rule of law radio. We're talking to John
[01:19:51.060 --> 01:19:54.460]  in New York and Deborah and I were talking about this on the break and she was concerned
[01:19:54.460 --> 01:19:59.460]  that, you know, you can try to record in the courtroom but you risk going to jail. And
[01:19:59.460 --> 01:20:06.020]  that's true, you do. The judge get annoyed and he can declare you and condemn the court
[01:20:06.020 --> 01:20:15.500]  and throw you in jail. The way I did this one was clean. I went down and I started in
[01:20:15.500 --> 01:20:21.460]  the courtroom and the bailiff said, well, you can't take that cell phone in the courtroom.
[01:20:21.460 --> 01:20:27.660]  I said, here can. I need it so that I can record the proceedings. Oh, you can't record
[01:20:27.660 --> 01:20:31.860]  the proceedings. Oh, yeah, I can. All I got to do is turn this camera on and stick it
[01:20:31.860 --> 01:20:36.460]  in my pocket. And nobody will know. It's just I won't interfere with anybody since
[01:20:36.460 --> 01:20:41.340]  here in my pocket. And I record the proceedings. Oh, no, no. The judge will not allow the proceedings
[01:20:41.340 --> 01:20:47.060]  to be recorded. He said, you're going to have to put that in the car. I said, oh, okay.
[01:20:47.060 --> 01:20:53.580]  So I went down, put in the car and come back. And they locked the courtroom. Well, I had
[01:20:53.580 --> 01:20:59.020]  already went in the courtroom and I was, they didn't see my cell phone before I went in.
[01:20:59.020 --> 01:21:04.540]  I guess they thought I was a lawyer, say anything to me. And I sat down and I called the bailiff
[01:21:04.540 --> 01:21:09.100]  over and asked for an appearance docket. Well, first I asked him, do you have accommodation
[01:21:09.100 --> 01:21:15.300]  for hearing impaired? And he said, no, he didn't. So I called him over and asked him
[01:21:15.300 --> 01:21:19.820]  for an appearance docket. He couldn't give me one. So I was getting a little frustrated
[01:21:19.820 --> 01:21:26.020]  with him. And then I got up and walked out. So I guess the guy went to the judge and said,
[01:21:26.020 --> 01:21:35.940]  there's some guy in here asking for stuff. And they decided to close the courtroom.
[01:21:35.940 --> 01:21:39.660]  So I come back, they had the courtroom going locked. They said, you can't go in there.
[01:21:39.660 --> 01:21:47.180]  Let's check in. I want to watch the proceedings. Well, the judge said that we had locked door.
[01:21:47.180 --> 01:21:58.340]  I said, to your knowledge, is there a juvenile case being heard right now? He said, no.
[01:21:58.340 --> 01:22:05.260]  Oh, okay. So this is just your morning cattle call. He said, yeah, essentially people have
[01:22:05.260 --> 01:22:09.820]  been arrested over the weekend and been brought before the judge. So pretty well established.
[01:22:09.820 --> 01:22:21.020]  It wasn't a hearing that they could seal. So I said, oh, okay. And I left. Then two weeks
[01:22:21.020 --> 01:22:30.420]  later I come back with criminal charges against the bailiff, not the judge. Reason? The judge
[01:22:30.420 --> 01:22:38.060]  did not deny me access to the courtroom. The bailiff denied me access to the courtroom.
[01:22:38.060 --> 01:22:44.020]  That's right. Yeah. He said the judge told him to, but yeah, I don't know if that's true
[01:22:44.020 --> 01:22:50.860]  or not. All I know is the bailiff standing there prominently displaying a deadly weapon
[01:22:50.860 --> 01:22:57.140]  told me I couldn't go in the courtroom. That'll work. I'm certainly not going to pass that
[01:22:57.140 --> 01:23:08.140]  loaded pistol. So what I'm hoping the bailiff does is throw the judge under the bus. Then
[01:23:08.140 --> 01:23:15.540]  I get to go back and file criminally against the judge. So I'm under the buck. Say that
[01:23:15.540 --> 01:23:22.900]  again. How's the bailiff going to throw the judge out of the bus or under the bus? Well,
[01:23:22.900 --> 01:23:28.180]  I have the defense of good faith reliance on competent authority as I was ordered to
[01:23:28.180 --> 01:23:42.580]  by the judge. Now he's off the hook. The judge is on the hook. So I've kind of put the bailiff
[01:23:42.580 --> 01:23:47.780]  in a quandary. And this is what I told the investigator. The prosecutor wouldn't talk
[01:23:47.780 --> 01:23:51.500]  to me. I told the investigator, so don't worry about this. I'm not after this bailiff. He
[01:23:51.500 --> 01:23:57.300]  is a really great guy. And that's why I used him because he was such a professional that
[01:23:57.300 --> 01:24:01.460]  I have no extra ground against him. What I need him to do is throw the judge under the
[01:24:01.460 --> 01:24:08.980]  bus for me. How do you do that? He just has to claim good faith reliance on competent
[01:24:08.980 --> 01:24:17.860]  authority and tell him, tell the court that the judge ordered him to do that. Well, that
[01:24:17.860 --> 01:24:22.300]  won't get him off the hook. He'll just throw the judge under the bus. Because I'm going
[01:24:22.300 --> 01:24:29.940]  to say, well, if the judge ordered you to stand on your head and squawk like a chicken,
[01:24:29.940 --> 01:24:36.220]  would you do that? If the ordered you to jump off the top of the courthouse head first,
[01:24:36.220 --> 01:24:47.780]  would you do that? Life is filled with little decisions. We all get to make some. The bailiff
[01:24:47.780 --> 01:24:54.460]  was advised of what the judge preferred. But the bailiff stipulated to me that he was
[01:24:54.460 --> 01:25:06.060]  well aware of the law in this matter. So he knew the law in the matter and decided to
[01:25:06.060 --> 01:25:12.620]  side with the judge and act in concert and collusion with the judge. So when he tries
[01:25:12.620 --> 01:25:19.340]  to claim good faith reliance on competent authority as an affirmative defense, then
[01:25:19.340 --> 01:25:28.900]  I accuse him and the judge of conspiring one with the other to deny me my right to do process.
[01:25:28.900 --> 01:25:39.300]  And this is a federal right. So this goes to FBI. But it's also a state, right? So first
[01:25:39.300 --> 01:25:48.140]  I go to the local prosecutor and get the prosecutor to refuse to give it to the grand jury. And
[01:25:48.140 --> 01:25:52.340]  they didn't ask me so I didn't tell them. But if they do ask, I'll tell them that's
[01:25:52.340 --> 01:25:56.620]  exactly what I'm going to do. They did tell me when the grand jury is supposed to meet
[01:25:56.620 --> 01:26:01.460]  and it's going to be in May. So I'll find out the exact day. And after the grand jury
[01:26:01.460 --> 01:26:06.420]  meets, I'll go down and ask to see all of the presentments by the grand jury. And if
[01:26:06.420 --> 01:26:12.460]  I don't see one on this officer, then I'll file against the prosecuting attorney to accuse
[01:26:12.460 --> 01:26:22.260]  him of obstruction of justice. And we just start the routine on him. But this one's good.
[01:26:22.260 --> 01:26:33.620]  It's nice and clean. There's no other no outside issues. The police officer didn't do anything
[01:26:33.620 --> 01:26:42.180]  I could charge him with other than what I charged him with. He did nothing that I would
[01:26:42.180 --> 01:26:49.060]  consider unprofessional. Nothing that would give anybody any reason to believe that I
[01:26:49.060 --> 01:26:59.700]  had an axe to grind with this guy. So that we don't get any other issues contaminating
[01:26:59.700 --> 01:27:07.780]  the issue I'm trying to address. And I set the prosecutor up by telling the bailiff that
[01:27:07.780 --> 01:27:14.420]  I was setting the prosecutor up. Then I'm going to give him opportunity to do the right
[01:27:14.420 --> 01:27:20.540]  thing or the wrong thing. So they know that I don't care what they do. And I've made
[01:27:20.540 --> 01:27:25.940]  it clear to them that I'm really after another county, which is in middle Tennessee. But
[01:27:25.940 --> 01:27:29.860]  that's not true. I'm not really after that county. I don't care if I said county. I'm
[01:27:29.860 --> 01:27:38.860]  after these guys. But what I wanted them to think is I'm using them for a crash dummy.
[01:27:38.860 --> 01:27:44.620]  And I was in Randall County and Randall County, I'm sorry. I was in Johnson County and I tried
[01:27:44.620 --> 01:27:51.100]  to see the morning hearings for people who had been arrested and they wouldn't let me
[01:27:51.100 --> 01:27:58.260]  go. And I told the lieutenant on the sheriff's department that I would likely be filing some
[01:27:58.260 --> 01:28:03.260]  really ugly criminal charges against him, but don't take it personal. You're going to
[01:28:03.260 --> 01:28:08.460]  file criminal charges against me and you don't want me to take it personal. I said, no, no,
[01:28:08.460 --> 01:28:13.260]  no, I'm not after you. Well, if you're not after me, who are you after? Oh, I'm after
[01:28:13.260 --> 01:28:22.780]  the district judge. Why are you filing against me? Oh, well, you're convenient. So how do
[01:28:22.780 --> 01:28:29.820]  you deal with that? How do you negotiate with me when I'm setting you up and using you for
[01:28:29.820 --> 01:28:41.820]  another purpose? If all this goes right, I will hear nothing from anyone. And I've set
[01:28:41.820 --> 01:28:47.820]  this up so that I don't need to hear anything from anyone. Prosecutor doesn't need to respond
[01:28:47.820 --> 01:28:51.980]  to me, doesn't need to talk to me. I'm going to wait until after the grand jury next
[01:28:51.980 --> 01:28:57.220]  meets and if I don't find in the record what I want to find, I'm just going to move against
[01:28:57.220 --> 01:29:06.380]  him and just steady turn the heat up. If we can get more people setting these guys up
[01:29:06.380 --> 01:29:16.580]  this way, not getting themselves in trouble. Doing it this way, I'm not setting myself
[01:29:16.580 --> 01:29:22.780]  up to be arrested. I'm putting them in a position to where they don't know how to deal with
[01:29:22.780 --> 01:29:29.900]  me and they don't want to talk to me. They definitely don't want me arrested. Does that
[01:29:29.900 --> 01:29:31.380]  make sense, John?
[01:29:31.380 --> 01:29:37.860]  Well, I guess it does. And so back to my original question. What if you were going into court?
[01:29:37.860 --> 01:29:43.420]  Wait a minute. You don't have time to ask a question. We're going to break.
[01:29:43.420 --> 01:30:04.180]  All right. Hang on, John. Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, will the radio, we'll be right back.
[01:30:04.180 --> 01:30:08.700]  This vital mineral fights cancer, fatigue and high blood pressure. Plus, it does wonders
[01:30:08.700 --> 01:30:13.500]  for your thyroid liver and immune system. And Dr. Kaepernal Brecht, in a moment, I'll
[01:30:13.500 --> 01:30:17.820]  let you know what this important healthy nutrient is.
[01:30:17.820 --> 01:30:22.300]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:30:22.300 --> 01:30:28.100]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:28.100 --> 01:30:34.340]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:34.340 --> 01:30:39.420]  it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private
[01:30:39.420 --> 01:30:46.660]  search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.660 --> 01:30:50.860]  When you think of nutritional deficiencies, you probably think of third world countries,
[01:30:50.860 --> 01:30:55.740]  or maybe you think of iron, folic acid, or vitamin C. But nutritionists say many of us
[01:30:55.740 --> 01:31:02.020]  don't get enough iodine, a trace mineral that's essential for thyroid and immune function.
[01:31:02.020 --> 01:31:07.580]  Vitamin is found in seafood, egg yolks, meat, and milk, and it's added to iodized salt.
[01:31:07.580 --> 01:31:12.260]  Vegetarians can get it through seaweed. But because the body does not make iodine, experts
[01:31:12.260 --> 01:31:17.820]  say up to three-quarters of us may be deficient. And that can lead to weight gain, depression,
[01:31:17.820 --> 01:31:22.700]  and even cancer. So put the eye back into iodine and check with your doctor to make
[01:31:22.700 --> 01:31:27.740]  sure you're getting enough. I'm Dr. Kaepernal Brecht for StartPage.com, the world's most
[01:31:27.740 --> 01:31:34.660]  private search engine. This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper
[01:31:34.660 --> 01:31:39.220]  that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.220 --> 01:31:44.060]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.060 --> 01:31:48.100]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and thousands of my fellow
[01:31:48.100 --> 01:31:52.060]  forces found this at dying. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a
[01:31:52.060 --> 01:31:56.100]  New York City correctional. I'm an Air Force pilot. I'm the father who lost his son. We
[01:31:56.100 --> 01:32:03.100]  are Americans, and we deserve to go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:03.100 --> 01:32:07.180]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's America,
[01:32:07.180 --> 01:32:10.100]  we live in an us against them society, and if we, the people, are ever going to have
[01:32:10.100 --> 01:32:14.180]  a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those
[01:32:14.180 --> 01:32:17.380]  rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own
[01:32:17.380 --> 01:32:21.380]  private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. The traffic courts
[01:32:21.380 --> 01:32:25.300]  will afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights
[01:32:25.300 --> 01:32:29.140]  through due process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law
[01:32:29.140 --> 01:32:32.620]  Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you
[01:32:32.620 --> 01:32:36.660]  understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law. You can get
[01:32:36.660 --> 01:32:40.700]  your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering
[01:32:40.700 --> 01:32:44.660]  your copy today. By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation
[01:32:44.660 --> 01:32:49.140]  Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of
[01:32:49.140 --> 01:32:52.820]  research documents, and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights
[01:32:52.820 --> 01:32:57.460]  with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can
[01:32:57.460 --> 01:33:23.460]  have free society we all want and deserve.
[01:33:23.460 --> 01:33:44.740]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and I kind of set you up for that,
[01:33:44.740 --> 01:33:53.300]  John. Okay, all right. Okay, what do you have? Well, the court is a public place open
[01:33:53.300 --> 01:34:01.340]  to all with the exception of certain cases like juvenile and seal cases. But does the
[01:34:01.340 --> 01:34:06.020]  average person have the right to bring in a cell phone and the right to have a recorder
[01:34:06.020 --> 01:34:12.700]  and use the recorder? Okay, that was a multifarious question. Objection, multifarious. Two questions
[01:34:12.700 --> 01:34:20.500]  in one. Do you have a right to bring in a cell phone? Not necessarily. Do you have a
[01:34:20.500 --> 01:34:31.220]  right to record? Yes. The fact that you can record with a cell phone doesn't preclude
[01:34:31.220 --> 01:34:39.620]  the judge from excluding cell phones because cell phones don't just take movies, they also
[01:34:39.620 --> 01:34:46.940]  ring in the courtroom. Okay, how about a recorder? It doesn't ring.
[01:34:46.940 --> 01:34:53.180]  So well, the judges have said, yeah, everybody says that and then they don't have it turned
[01:34:53.180 --> 01:35:00.460]  off so I'm just excluding cell phones. That's why I told him, well, I want to use it to
[01:35:00.460 --> 01:35:08.340]  record the proceedings and got him to say, oh, you can't record the proceedings. So
[01:35:08.340 --> 01:35:13.300]  I'm not going to raise the question about a cell phone. I'm going to raise the question
[01:35:13.300 --> 01:35:19.260]  about recording. I was in a justice court with a judge who knew me pretty well, and
[01:35:19.260 --> 01:35:24.100]  she said, you don't have to turn off the cell phones. I said, oh, but your honor, I wanted
[01:35:24.100 --> 01:35:29.820]  to use this cell phone to record the proceedings. Mr. Maynard, take that phone for Mr. Kelton.
[01:35:29.820 --> 01:35:36.220]  And he goes over and takes my phone and I had to show him how to shut it off. And she
[01:35:36.220 --> 01:35:43.220]  starts the hearing again and I'm sitting here grinning at her. And she stopped. Mr. Kelton,
[01:35:43.220 --> 01:35:55.060]  do you have any other device capable of recording these proceedings? Oh, judge, I was hoping
[01:35:55.060 --> 01:36:01.660]  you wouldn't ask that question. And on my name tag, I had a little zip drive and it
[01:36:01.660 --> 01:36:09.660]  was recorded. I had it stuck on there with the Velcro. So I ripped it off and turned
[01:36:09.660 --> 01:36:15.420]  it off and gave it to the bailiff and he jerked it out of my hand. He came back, she
[01:36:15.420 --> 01:36:24.900]  starts again, she stops. Mr. Kelton, do you have anything else capable of recording these
[01:36:24.900 --> 01:36:32.700]  proceedings? Well, judge, I really hoped you wouldn't ask me that again. He reached in
[01:36:32.700 --> 01:36:40.700]  my pocket and pulled out another one. He looked at me anymore. No more, judge. That was so
[01:36:40.700 --> 01:36:48.620]  much fun. But at the time, it was a fight I didn't have time to have. Well, now I'm
[01:36:48.620 --> 01:36:59.700]  here in Tennessee and I need to exercise jurisprudence in Tennessee. But I don't want to exercise
[01:36:59.700 --> 01:37:08.860]  it by visiting the jail. So I'm being more careful. I'm setting them up. And when I talked
[01:37:08.860 --> 01:37:19.700]  to the bailiff, I got him to specifically forbid me from recording the proceedings.
[01:37:19.700 --> 01:37:25.260]  So that's all I needed. I got that. And then when they came back and locked the courtroom,
[01:37:25.260 --> 01:37:34.300]  that I did not see coming. I didn't expect that. That was a holy mackerel. But they had
[01:37:34.300 --> 01:37:40.140]  done that before and they had done that in Clarksville when Olivier was calling in and
[01:37:40.140 --> 01:37:48.340]  having trouble with Clarksville, Tennessee. So it wasn't as unexpected as it could have
[01:37:48.340 --> 01:38:00.860]  been. But it was good. It was clean. I'm not in there having a court case to have no claim
[01:38:00.860 --> 01:38:09.260]  on me whatsoever. I'm just this third party ringer that can come in and set them up. And
[01:38:09.260 --> 01:38:13.100]  that's what they're going to think. That's what I want them to think. This guy set us
[01:38:13.100 --> 01:38:24.020]  up. So what else is he setting us up for? I want them to be very careful. I want them
[01:38:24.020 --> 01:38:29.180]  to try to do everything right and then want to see what everything right looks like to
[01:38:29.180 --> 01:38:38.500]  them. Sound like fun, John? You had another question. Oh, that was the other question
[01:38:38.500 --> 01:38:44.940]  about cell phones. Yeah, absolutely. I would say any court will uphold that you can block
[01:38:44.940 --> 01:38:50.740]  cell phones. We don't want people in the court answering calls and their phone rings and
[01:38:50.740 --> 01:38:54.060]  they jump up and run out of the courtroom to finish the call. They come back and sit
[01:38:54.060 --> 01:38:58.060]  down in the courtroom and all this traffic back and forth and cut that crap out. Do not
[01:38:58.060 --> 01:39:05.060]  hear it. But the recorder is legal. The recorder is legal. Yes, that's specifically authorized.
[01:39:05.060 --> 01:39:12.060]  And it's okay. Now, what is the law? They're going to say, no, I'm sorry. You can't record.
[01:39:12.060 --> 01:39:18.220]  If you get to law, they're going to try to, you know, pick up their way. So what law do
[01:39:18.220 --> 01:39:22.540]  you hit them with? That it's okay, besides the fact that it's a public law.
[01:39:22.540 --> 01:39:30.620]  This is okay. The law is the constitutional right to a public court. And every bill of
[01:39:30.620 --> 01:39:39.140]  rights for every state has that in it. That's what I figured. Yeah. Yeah. So the crime is
[01:39:39.140 --> 01:39:45.820]  official misconduct in that the court exerts or purports to exert an authority it does
[01:39:45.820 --> 01:39:51.220]  not express to have. And the process denies you and the full free access to enjoyment.
[01:39:51.220 --> 01:40:00.940]  Right. That's what I'll charge. That's what I charge the bailiff with. Yeah. And that's
[01:40:00.940 --> 01:40:05.540]  kind of a catch all. So that's a good one to set them up with. Okay. Is that it? I've
[01:40:05.540 --> 01:40:12.780]  got one more caller. Okay. Just a real, real fast one. Where do you go if you have an eviction
[01:40:12.780 --> 01:40:19.980]  and the judge is corrupt? We all know that the bank is corrupt. The lawyers are dealing
[01:40:19.980 --> 01:40:26.060]  with corrupted forage. We got all that part. That's the politics part. Where do you go
[01:40:26.060 --> 01:40:33.100]  when what? Well, where do you go when you're trying to find an attorney who might take
[01:40:33.100 --> 01:40:37.660]  this on a contingency basis? And where do you find these attorneys? Because most of
[01:40:37.660 --> 01:40:44.220]  the time you are not going to find any lawyer in his right professional mind that would
[01:40:44.220 --> 01:40:53.860]  take an eviction case on contingency. Because a contingent eviction case has no claims that
[01:40:53.860 --> 01:41:02.980]  he could get any funds for. And he's got someone that couldn't pay their mortgage. So he's
[01:41:02.980 --> 01:41:10.860]  going to figure he doesn't have someone with deep pockets. All right. And he's not going
[01:41:10.860 --> 01:41:16.660]  to do anything to annoy the court. Well, how about if there's fraud involved in forgery
[01:41:16.660 --> 01:41:23.100]  and can you invite the FBI in or the Justice Department? Usually the FBI goes first and
[01:41:23.100 --> 01:41:35.260]  then the Justice Department goes second. Yes, you can. But the FBI only cares about big cases.
[01:41:35.260 --> 01:41:42.340]  Okay. Yeah, you can make criminal charges. But the FBI is not going to be interested
[01:41:42.340 --> 01:41:51.020]  in pursuing them. And you have to have our fight with the FBI. And I've got a methodology
[01:41:51.020 --> 01:41:56.780]  to do that. But we can't get people to do it. I'm the only one that ever does that.
[01:41:56.780 --> 01:42:04.380]  We'll file with the SAC and then file against the SAC and with the U.S. Attorney. And then
[01:42:04.380 --> 01:42:10.820]  when he fails to act, you file against the U.S. Attorney and with the grand jury. And
[01:42:10.820 --> 01:42:18.340]  it's a process. Right. Well, is there anybody? If the case is already a part of a major investigation
[01:42:18.340 --> 01:42:22.700]  nationwide from one set of states to all the way to the other side, East Coast, West Coast,
[01:42:22.700 --> 01:42:28.180]  and it's already part of a criminal investigation. Okay. Hold on, John. I can't do this cryptically.
[01:42:28.180 --> 01:42:33.500]  If you're talking about something, tell me what you're talking about instead of alluding
[01:42:33.500 --> 01:42:37.900]  to it. Well, I'm just saying, if it's already part
[01:42:37.900 --> 01:42:43.100]  of a major investigation by the FBI, and this is just one more case that they could add
[01:42:43.100 --> 01:42:47.620]  to it, is there any way, any special way to get it listened to? No special way that I
[01:42:47.620 --> 01:42:52.660]  know of. You just have to find a lawyer who's interested. You might talk to the lawyers
[01:42:52.660 --> 01:42:59.980]  that are already engaged in the case and they might want to bring yours in. I see. Okay.
[01:42:59.980 --> 01:43:05.700]  Alrighty. Thank you. Okay. Thank you, John. Okay. Thank you.
[01:43:05.700 --> 01:43:13.740]  Now we've got Sirid in California. I'm not sure if I pronounced that right, but we've
[01:43:13.740 --> 01:43:20.180]  only got about 47 seconds. Quickly, Sirid, do you have a question? We've got 45 seconds
[01:43:20.180 --> 01:43:25.860]  before the board. How about you, Andy?
[01:43:25.860 --> 01:43:34.980]  And I am good. What do you have for us? So I defaulted in an unlawful detainer action.
[01:43:34.980 --> 01:43:42.380]  I defaulted the other side in regards to the alleged plaintiff not existing under notary
[01:43:42.380 --> 01:43:47.780]  business as well as under the power of the PINA. Okay. Hang on. About to go to break.
[01:43:47.780 --> 01:43:52.820]  We'll pick this up on the other side, an unlawful detainer. Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens,
[01:43:52.820 --> 01:44:00.620]  Will's Law Radio. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.620 --> 01:44:05.260]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[01:44:05.260 --> 01:44:09.820]  of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves. And it's time
[01:44:09.820 --> 01:44:16.060]  we changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[01:44:16.060 --> 01:44:21.220]  is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated and
[01:44:21.220 --> 01:44:27.900]  mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logo radio network gets many requests
[01:44:27.900 --> 01:44:33.300]  to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust Jevity
[01:44:33.300 --> 01:44:39.140]  so much. We became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs and many
[01:44:39.140 --> 01:44:46.060]  others. When you order from Logo Radio Network.com, your health will improve as you help support
[01:44:46.060 --> 01:44:53.140]  quality radio. As you realize the benefits of Jevity, you may want to join us. As a distributor,
[01:44:53.140 --> 01:44:59.220]  you can experience improved health, help your friends and family and increase your income.
[01:44:59.220 --> 01:45:05.940]  Order now. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney
[01:45:05.940 --> 01:45:11.540]  with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show
[01:45:11.540 --> 01:45:18.220]  you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should
[01:45:18.220 --> 01:45:23.540]  be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands
[01:45:23.540 --> 01:45:29.500]  have won with our step by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created
[01:45:29.500 --> 01:45:35.420]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in
[01:45:35.420 --> 01:45:41.020]  a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices
[01:45:41.020 --> 01:45:46.780]  that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar,
[01:45:46.780 --> 01:45:55.060]  tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:45:55.060 --> 01:46:23.060]  and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:23.060 --> 01:46:52.540]  Okay, we are back. We're into Carlson, Debra Stephens, rule of law radio, and we're talking
[01:46:52.540 --> 01:46:53.540]  right now.
[01:46:53.540 --> 01:46:57.540]  I'm going to introduce a read in California. Okay, unlawful detainer.
[01:46:57.540 --> 01:46:58.540]  Yes, so I've got the status.
[01:46:58.540 --> 01:46:59.540]  So the status is that they have filed for, the other side have filed for unlawful detainer.
[01:46:59.540 --> 01:47:14.540]  And there's a trial date. I'm trying to avoid going to the trial date because the judges
[01:47:14.540 --> 01:47:26.140]  in California routinely exclude evidence from the matter to be heard and basically become
[01:47:26.140 --> 01:47:33.060]  a student doctor in this trial by jury courts. And the jury doesn't know any of that. So
[01:47:33.060 --> 01:47:41.340]  what I'm trying to do, I actually defaulted the other side. Today I tried to file for
[01:47:41.340 --> 01:47:47.340]  a default against the non-existing plaintiff because of the trustee of the court trust.
[01:47:47.340 --> 01:47:55.620]  Okay, hold on. What was the nature of the default? And the reason I'm asking this question
[01:47:55.620 --> 01:48:05.140]  is I'm looking for an issue from which you can file an interlocutory appeal.
[01:48:05.140 --> 01:48:16.140]  So the other side says that there is no plaintiff. I found a notary witness. I send a subpoena
[01:48:16.140 --> 01:48:25.820]  to them that I need a power of attorney for the attorney to represent the plaintiff and
[01:48:25.820 --> 01:48:28.140]  they defaulted on that.
[01:48:28.140 --> 01:48:39.620]  Oh, so that would give you a claim back against those lawyers. Now, what is the status of
[01:48:39.620 --> 01:48:48.580]  law in California concerning this issue? In Texas, on an unlawful detainer, you can have
[01:48:48.580 --> 01:48:57.900]  a non-lawyer can't come in and represent the client in the court. Is it the same in California
[01:48:57.900 --> 01:49:03.380]  or does a lawyer have to represent the client or the client represents themselves?
[01:49:03.380 --> 01:49:10.620]  Well, corporations in California, that's my knowledge and only be represented by that
[01:49:10.620 --> 01:49:11.620]  attorney.
[01:49:11.620 --> 01:49:12.620]  Yes.
[01:49:12.620 --> 01:49:21.340]  Okay, now hold on. That's a general issue and it's the same in Texas except for one
[01:49:21.340 --> 01:49:32.940]  circumstance and that's unlawful detainer. Is there a similar law in California? This
[01:49:32.940 --> 01:49:39.820]  was done because this guy's got an apartment complex with 500 apartments in and he's always
[01:49:39.820 --> 01:49:50.140]  evicting somebody. So they allowed them to use non-lawyers for this singular purpose.
[01:49:50.140 --> 01:50:00.980]  You need to see if that's off point because power of attorney wouldn't matter if they
[01:50:00.980 --> 01:50:11.340]  were lawyers or not lawyers. Someone is coming into court and alleging that they are an agent
[01:50:11.340 --> 01:50:17.340]  for a principal who has a claim.
[01:50:17.340 --> 01:50:25.660]  That's correct and even though it's under multiple circumstances, that I need to speak
[01:50:25.660 --> 01:50:34.020]  with the California record to determine whether or not such an entity exists under the law.
[01:50:34.020 --> 01:50:41.980]  Have you filed a demand for proof of agency?
[01:50:41.980 --> 01:50:55.860]  Okay, and they failed to respond. I have some case law in Texas that probably has similar
[01:50:55.860 --> 01:51:07.180]  case law in California and it says that any claims in the active pleadings not rebutted
[01:51:07.180 --> 01:51:22.300]  or challenged by the defendant or by the respondent gives official judicial notice. So any claims
[01:51:22.300 --> 01:51:36.340]  that are not refuted or are admitted to, any claims in the active petition and the litigant
[01:51:36.340 --> 01:51:45.580]  may not argue these issues in court. Send me an email, ask for that case law and I'll
[01:51:45.580 --> 01:51:58.580]  give you that and we have one Walker v. Packer. Walker v. Packer says that a judge has no discretion
[01:51:58.580 --> 01:52:07.420]  in properly applying the law to the facts of failure to do so is an abusive discretion.
[01:52:07.420 --> 01:52:11.940]  An abusive discretion that denies the citizen full free access to or enjoyment of rights
[01:52:11.940 --> 01:52:20.820]  of crime in every state. So California is almost certainly going to have case law on
[01:52:20.820 --> 01:52:27.980]  this issue because this goes to the primary duty of the judge to properly apply the law
[01:52:27.980 --> 01:52:37.420]  to the facts. So when you move for some re-judgment, if the judge denies it, first thing you want
[01:52:37.420 --> 01:52:44.260]  to do is request findings of fact and conclusions at law. You move for a stay of proceedings
[01:52:44.260 --> 01:52:52.300]  until that's secured because if you have a dispositive motion, a motion that would dispose
[01:52:52.300 --> 01:53:01.460]  of the case where someone came to the case alleging agency to represent a principal and
[01:53:01.460 --> 01:53:07.900]  you challenge the agency, they fail to prove up the agency. If they are unable to, then
[01:53:07.900 --> 01:53:16.220]  they lack the official capacity to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court.
[01:53:16.220 --> 01:53:22.220]  And that would be dispositive, that would dismiss the case. So any ruling on a dispositive
[01:53:22.220 --> 01:53:28.700]  motion is subject to interlocutory appeal. And the trick here is, is you ask for findings
[01:53:28.700 --> 01:53:37.300]  of fact. The judge in an eviction case is always an inferior judge, a JP generally.
[01:53:37.300 --> 01:53:46.060]  They don't know law, they're not going to give you findings of fact. But in a dispositive
[01:53:46.060 --> 01:53:51.620]  ruling, you have a right to interlocutory appeal. But you can't do an appeal if you
[01:53:51.620 --> 01:53:58.020]  don't know what the heck judge ruled on. And by not giving you findings of fact, he denies
[01:53:58.020 --> 01:54:05.260]  you in your right to file an interlocutory appeal. So you file a petition for rid of
[01:54:05.260 --> 01:54:13.700]  mandamus. You ask the court to order the lower court to do something they have a duty to
[01:54:13.700 --> 01:54:21.100]  do. And in this case, you ask the higher court to order the lower court to produce the law
[01:54:21.100 --> 01:54:28.300]  and the facts on which the judge applied the law and the specific law of the judge applied
[01:54:28.300 --> 01:54:34.420]  to those facts so that you can file an interlocutory appeal. Does this make sense?
[01:54:34.420 --> 01:54:48.740]  Yes, it does. Are there the reasons of the court that I tried to file for a default against
[01:54:48.740 --> 01:54:56.460]  the other side, alleged plaintiff? The clerk refused, actually filed it, but refused to
[01:54:56.460 --> 01:55:04.660]  issue a default. And it is citing that I am not an attorney and that defendant cannot
[01:55:04.660 --> 01:55:12.740]  enter default. And I told the clerk that I called a lawyer.
[01:55:12.740 --> 01:55:18.660]  Okay, hold on. You're saying that the defendant cannot enter default. This is what they
[01:55:18.660 --> 01:55:25.660]  did. Did the clerk rule this? That's what the clerk wrote on the page of the
[01:55:25.660 --> 01:55:33.700]  Now, then file a petition for rid of mandamus. That's going to stop everything. You file
[01:55:33.700 --> 01:55:43.540]  that with, if you're in a justice court, in most jurisdictions, from an inferior court,
[01:55:43.540 --> 01:55:53.540]  you appeal to a superior court. An inferior court is a court that can be adjudicated with
[01:55:53.540 --> 01:56:01.820]  a judge who is not a bar card, not a lawyer. That's generally municipal and justice of
[01:56:01.820 --> 01:56:06.700]  the peace. So an appeal from one of those courts will almost always go to the county
[01:56:06.700 --> 01:56:13.380]  court. The county court judge must be a lawyer and therefore that's a superior court as a
[01:56:13.380 --> 01:56:20.980]  opposed to an inferior. So from JP or municipal, you generally appeal to the county court.
[01:56:20.980 --> 01:56:28.140]  And the county court is going to deny your mandamus out of hand. That's what they always
[01:56:28.140 --> 01:56:36.460]  do. Then you can file an appeal that mandamus ruling to the court of appeals. That ought
[01:56:36.460 --> 01:56:46.860]  to take them a year. Yes, so what happens is that renters, by law, by California Civil
[01:56:46.860 --> 01:56:55.660]  Procedures 2888, homeowners are not renters. What these attorneys do, they file an action
[01:56:55.660 --> 01:57:01.940]  on the unlawful detainee. But unlawful detainee does not apply to a homeowner. And I keep mentioning
[01:57:01.940 --> 01:57:07.500]  get to the judge and I give him the law, but he says that's not very clear. I said what
[01:57:07.500 --> 01:57:14.220]  part is not clear, judge? The fact that I'm not a renter, I'm an owner. I'm not a renter.
[01:57:14.220 --> 01:57:24.620]  Have you been, okay, has there been a foreclosure? They notice me and the general public that
[01:57:24.620 --> 01:57:36.620]  was there a foreclosure completed? Yes. If there was a foreclosure completed, then you're
[01:57:36.620 --> 01:57:48.020]  no longer construed as the owner, but a renter in sufferance. Well, according to the California
[01:57:48.020 --> 01:57:54.940]  Law, and I can cite you several case laws, one of them, for example, is Jenkins versus
[01:57:54.940 --> 01:58:03.980]  Chase Manhattan, thanks. All the non-ditional foreclosure does is create a disuse of lien
[01:58:03.980 --> 01:58:11.820]  on the title. The title still stays with the homeowner, and that's right in the statute.
[01:58:11.820 --> 01:58:20.380]  And I can actually send you my papers with the appropriate case law that the title is
[01:58:20.380 --> 01:58:26.460]  still stays with the homeowner. Okay, hang on. I am running out of time. If you want, you
[01:58:26.460 --> 01:58:34.060]  can call back tomorrow night. My, it's sort to the California Supreme trying to get them
[01:58:34.060 --> 01:58:39.340]  to distinguish Jenkins they wouldn't pick up. But we can talk about this tomorrow night.
[01:58:39.340 --> 01:58:44.300]  I'm sorry we're out of time. Randy Kelsen, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, thank
[01:58:44.300 --> 01:58:50.620]  you all for listening. We'll be back tomorrow night. Good night.
[01:58:50.620 --> 01:58:56.700]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament
[01:58:56.700 --> 01:59:02.140]  Recovery Version. The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain
[01:59:02.140 --> 01:59:07.700]  what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of
[01:59:07.700 --> 01:59:16.740]  life. Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102
[01:59:16.740 --> 01:59:23.820]  or visit us online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over
[01:59:23.820 --> 01:59:30.340]  13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.340 --> 01:59:35.340]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery
[01:59:35.340 --> 01:59:49.020]  Version call us toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.