[00:00.000 --> 00:29.520]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22 an ounce.
[00:29.520 --> 00:31.840]  Silver $16.68 an ounce.
[00:31.840 --> 00:34.920]  Texas Crude $5.51 a barrel.
[00:34.920 --> 00:38.200]  Bitcoin $6,902.19.
[00:38.200 --> 00:41.080]  Ethereum $420.80.
[00:41.080 --> 00:44.000]  Bitcoin Cash $652.90.
[00:44.000 --> 00:55.480]  And finally Litecoins $114.34 a crypto coin.
[00:55.480 --> 00:58.680]  Today in history, the year 1968.
[00:58.680 --> 01:02.720]  President Lyndon M. Johnson signs the Civil Rights Act of 1968,
[01:02.720 --> 01:04.360]  which prohibited private businesses
[01:04.360 --> 01:07.080]  from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex,
[01:07.080 --> 01:08.680]  or national origin.
[01:08.680 --> 01:10.520]  It also prohibited unequal application
[01:10.520 --> 01:13.360]  of voter registration requirements, racial segregation
[01:13.360 --> 01:16.880]  in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations
[01:16.880 --> 01:18.280]  for places of business.
[01:18.280 --> 01:19.120]  Today in history.
[01:23.960 --> 01:25.880]  In recent news, tensions in Syria
[01:25.880 --> 01:28.200]  seem to have reached new levels after a chemical attack
[01:28.200 --> 01:30.880]  on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead
[01:30.880 --> 01:31.920]  and many injured.
[01:31.920 --> 01:33.960]  An attack which is being blamed on the democratically
[01:33.960 --> 01:36.640]  elected president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad,
[01:36.640 --> 01:39.360]  by the United States and on Israel by Russia,
[01:39.360 --> 01:42.120]  either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence
[01:42.120 --> 01:43.200]  as of yet.
[01:43.200 --> 01:44.920]  President Trump tweeted today Wednesday
[01:44.920 --> 01:47.040]  that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down
[01:47.040 --> 01:49.240]  any and all missiles fired at Syria,
[01:49.240 --> 01:51.800]  get ready, Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new
[01:51.800 --> 01:53.920]  and smart, going on to warn Russia
[01:53.920 --> 01:56.680]  that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who
[01:56.680 --> 01:58.600]  kills its people and enjoys it.
[01:58.600 --> 02:00.360]  Many in the West, including President Trump,
[02:00.360 --> 02:03.840]  have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must
[02:03.840 --> 02:06.640]  have been conducted by Assad and his forces.
[02:06.640 --> 02:08.160]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand,
[02:08.160 --> 02:10.280]  have given approval since yesterday
[02:10.280 --> 02:13.080]  for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons
[02:13.080 --> 02:15.760]  to investigate the sign of the chemical slaughter.
[02:15.760 --> 02:18.200]  Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support
[02:18.200 --> 02:20.400]  during Syria's seven-year civil war,
[02:20.400 --> 02:22.880]  a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria
[02:22.880 --> 02:25.720]  and anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly
[02:25.720 --> 02:27.720]  being funded by Western governments,
[02:27.720 --> 02:30.240]  with ISIS being one of the more notorious flinter groups
[02:30.240 --> 02:32.600]  of the American-backed Syrian rebels.
[02:32.600 --> 02:35.880]  No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman
[02:35.880 --> 02:39.120]  Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook that smart missiles should
[02:39.120 --> 02:42.440]  be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which
[02:42.440 --> 02:44.440]  has been fighting terrorists.
[02:44.440 --> 02:46.320]  Or is this a trick to destroy all traces
[02:46.320 --> 02:47.800]  with a smart missile strike?
[02:47.800 --> 02:50.440]  And then there will be no evidence for international inspectors
[02:50.440 --> 02:53.400]  to look at.
[02:53.400 --> 02:57.000]  This was Brick Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[03:23.400 --> 03:38.440]  OK, howdy, howdy, this is Randy Kelton,
[03:38.440 --> 03:41.920]  rule of law radio, on this Friday, the third day of August
[03:41.920 --> 03:45.040]  2018.
[03:45.040 --> 03:48.080]  We will have the caller boards open all night.
[03:48.080 --> 03:52.880]  I did a kind of a special show yesterday.
[03:52.880 --> 03:56.520]  So we didn't take any callers until right at the end.
[03:56.520 --> 03:57.720]  It only had one caller.
[03:57.720 --> 04:03.080]  So if tonight we'll have the caller boards open all night,
[04:03.080 --> 04:06.960]  our call in number 512-646-1984.
[04:06.960 --> 04:12.720]  So if you have a question or a comment, give us a call.
[04:12.720 --> 04:14.680]  I'm going to start out talking a bit about what
[04:14.680 --> 04:17.200]  I talked about last night.
[04:17.200 --> 04:19.600]  I won't go through the whole routine,
[04:19.600 --> 04:23.560]  but this project that I've been working on for the last 10
[04:23.560 --> 04:28.000]  years, over that time, if you listen to the show,
[04:28.000 --> 04:31.880]  you've probably heard me complain about programmers
[04:31.880 --> 04:36.080]  and how I can't get programmers to wrap their head around
[04:36.080 --> 04:38.520]  what I'm doing.
[04:38.520 --> 04:45.920]  Because the technology, the tool that I used,
[04:45.920 --> 04:53.400]  it created a set of essentially linked lists
[04:53.400 --> 04:57.680]  of information, and they didn't fit well
[04:57.680 --> 05:00.800]  into any database structure that I could find.
[05:00.800 --> 05:07.160]  Certainly not your standard databases
[05:07.160 --> 05:14.040]  that we see like SQL and MySQL and all these rational databases,
[05:14.040 --> 05:18.840]  they just didn't fit well.
[05:18.840 --> 05:22.080]  And I was trying to get programmers
[05:22.080 --> 05:24.320]  to write me a different kind of tool
[05:24.320 --> 05:30.000]  to give me a more mobile and volatile database.
[05:30.000 --> 05:36.280]  One that created itself and then de-created itself
[05:36.280 --> 05:38.640]  and grew and shrunk depending on what
[05:38.640 --> 05:40.440]  we did to the questionnaires.
[05:40.440 --> 05:43.960]  And I could not get programmers to wrap their head around
[05:43.960 --> 05:44.760]  it.
[05:44.760 --> 05:51.280]  As I worked with it, something grew out
[05:51.280 --> 05:54.680]  of the formations of data that it created.
[05:54.680 --> 06:00.600]  I built these questionnaires, and they became very large,
[06:00.600 --> 06:02.720]  very fast.
[06:02.720 --> 06:05.680]  And I'm sitting here working with a computer that
[06:05.680 --> 06:12.480]  is a gaming machine, this overclocked 4 gig processor.
[06:12.480 --> 06:17.360]  And 16 or 32, I forget how much RAM it's got,
[06:17.360 --> 06:20.720]  but way more than it needs.
[06:20.720 --> 06:23.000]  However, it's got eight processors.
[06:23.000 --> 06:26.040]  However, there's almost no software,
[06:26.040 --> 06:30.840]  except gaming software, that can use those eight processors.
[06:30.840 --> 06:33.800]  A program has to be capable of multi-threading
[06:33.800 --> 06:35.640]  and parallel processing.
[06:35.640 --> 06:38.840]  Well, your standard Windows programs,
[06:38.840 --> 06:45.760]  they can't multi-thread, so they only use one of the processors.
[06:45.760 --> 06:49.000]  It didn't take very long until I had a questionnaire.
[06:49.000 --> 06:52.840]  Every single questionnaire I do very quickly gets so big
[06:52.840 --> 06:59.280]  that even this machine takes 15 to 20 minutes to open it.
[06:59.280 --> 07:00.880]  I've got a notebook on the desk.
[07:00.880 --> 07:04.080]  Behind me, it won't open them at all.
[07:04.080 --> 07:08.880]  And in trying to find logical places
[07:08.880 --> 07:12.160]  where I could break these questions apart
[07:12.160 --> 07:16.320]  and break out parts of it and save it as a separate file,
[07:16.320 --> 07:21.000]  so instead of having the whole questionnaire loaded up
[07:21.000 --> 07:25.560]  in memory at one time, I just had a small section.
[07:25.560 --> 07:29.480]  And I would ask four, five, six, seven questions.
[07:29.480 --> 07:31.680]  And then the next question, you click on it,
[07:31.680 --> 07:34.200]  and it would open another file.
[07:34.200 --> 07:36.720]  Well, it was fast enough that you couldn't tell
[07:36.720 --> 07:39.320]  that it actually opened another file.
[07:39.320 --> 07:40.720]  So that worked out really well.
[07:40.720 --> 07:48.520]  But in building that, patterns of data began to emerge.
[07:48.520 --> 07:50.640]  And none of these patterns worked well
[07:50.640 --> 07:53.400]  with your standard relational databases.
[07:53.400 --> 07:57.200]  So I've been for a long time looking for something different.
[07:57.200 --> 08:02.360]  And one thing, I was watching a program once
[08:02.360 --> 08:07.920]  about migrating birds in this huge flock of birds.
[08:07.920 --> 08:12.640]  We're flying around and making some incredible shapes
[08:12.640 --> 08:18.520]  with the flock as they moved around.
[08:18.520 --> 08:23.840]  And you've probably seen videos of that.
[08:23.840 --> 08:31.400]  I began to wonder, how does a flock of birds manage
[08:31.400 --> 08:35.880]  to produce this kind of visual imagery?
[08:35.880 --> 08:42.880]  How much information does a single bird need to be able
[08:42.880 --> 08:47.880]  to be an integral part of something
[08:47.880 --> 08:51.440]  that appears to be so complex?
[08:51.440 --> 08:57.960]  It turns out that the bird only needs to be able to see the one
[08:57.960 --> 09:02.200]  in front of him, and one to either side
[09:02.200 --> 09:05.560]  or maybe above or below.
[09:05.560 --> 09:10.360]  The bird that is being followed is on the first level,
[09:10.360 --> 09:12.120]  and then there's a second level
[09:12.120 --> 09:14.880]  that's in the bird's peripheral vision.
[09:14.880 --> 09:18.080]  And he will follow that bird in front of him
[09:18.080 --> 09:22.240]  unless the bird changes directions more
[09:22.240 --> 09:24.160]  than a standard deviation.
[09:24.160 --> 09:26.960]  The birds have a standard deviation.
[09:26.960 --> 09:29.080]  And it's generally half the distance
[09:29.080 --> 09:31.920]  between the birds next to it.
[09:31.920 --> 09:36.360]  So if a bird flying in front of another one,
[09:36.360 --> 09:38.600]  and the one in behind is following that one,
[09:38.600 --> 09:41.880]  and this bird has a heart attack and falls out of the,
[09:41.880 --> 09:44.280]  drops out of the flock like a stone,
[09:44.280 --> 09:48.280]  the flock is not going to follow that bird into the ground.
[09:48.280 --> 09:51.560]  What will happen is when that bird deviates
[09:51.560 --> 09:55.720]  beyond a standard deviation, the bird will lock
[09:55.720 --> 10:01.400]  on to the next closest bird that's not exceeding a standard
[10:01.400 --> 10:03.560]  deviation.
[10:03.560 --> 10:06.000]  So they'll let that bird drop out,
[10:06.000 --> 10:09.000]  and it won't really affect the swarm.
[10:09.000 --> 10:10.720]  If the bird in front of it moves
[10:10.720 --> 10:13.080]  within standard deviation, he'll follow it.
[10:13.080 --> 10:15.120]  So you've got a whole mass of these birds,
[10:15.120 --> 10:18.200]  all following the birds in front of them.
[10:18.200 --> 10:19.600]  And they have a couple of rules.
[10:19.600 --> 10:22.840]  If the bird gets out of hand, we pick the one closest to it
[10:22.840 --> 10:25.680]  and follow that one instead.
[10:25.680 --> 10:29.040]  That's all they need to create these massive swarms.
[10:29.040 --> 10:31.360]  And when you look at these swarms,
[10:31.360 --> 10:39.040]  you see almost exactly the same patterns in birds and fish
[10:39.040 --> 10:48.040]  and bees and ants and cows and wildebeest.
[10:48.040 --> 10:52.280]  All through nature, you see this same pattern recurring.
[10:52.280 --> 10:55.360]  And it began to occur to me that this
[10:55.360 --> 10:58.560]  is not an intelligent pattern.
[10:58.560 --> 11:01.440]  It's an organic pattern.
[11:01.440 --> 11:04.760]  And in structuring how the brain works,
[11:04.760 --> 11:08.320]  a number of years ago, I built a mental model
[11:08.320 --> 11:10.440]  of the living mind.
[11:10.440 --> 11:13.800]  And it predicted the behaviors that I
[11:13.800 --> 11:16.960]  was seeing in these swarms.
[11:16.960 --> 11:20.400]  So I called it the swarm matrix.
[11:20.400 --> 11:26.440]  So I went on the internet looking for swarm database.
[11:26.440 --> 11:29.480]  Doug Conniff, I didn't find one.
[11:29.480 --> 11:35.040]  There were two companies, as far as I can tell, on the planet.
[11:35.040 --> 11:37.440]  And they both worked together.
[11:37.440 --> 11:40.440]  They worked with a database that's
[11:40.440 --> 11:45.240]  built on precisely this structure.
[11:45.240 --> 11:49.680]  When I told the programmers what I was doing,
[11:49.680 --> 11:50.600]  they were amazed.
[11:50.600 --> 11:54.200]  It's the first time they've ever seen anyone bring in
[11:54.200 --> 11:59.080]  a definition or a description of what they were doing.
[11:59.080 --> 12:04.280]  An interesting part about that is in doing all this research
[12:04.280 --> 12:14.400]  and we're trying to get an ICO, a coin auction.
[12:14.400 --> 12:21.320]  It's a method of financing this program we're working on.
[12:21.320 --> 12:26.240]  It gave me reason to investigate into the current technology
[12:26.240 --> 12:29.120]  of the internet.
[12:29.120 --> 12:31.720]  And in investigating what's going on,
[12:31.720 --> 12:35.360]  it became clear that something remarkable is
[12:35.360 --> 12:39.600]  in the process of taking place.
[12:39.600 --> 12:45.360]  This crypto technology and blockchain technology,
[12:45.360 --> 12:47.280]  I say crypto and blockchain because there
[12:47.280 --> 12:52.360]  are actually two separate technologies used together,
[12:52.360 --> 12:58.440]  has the capacity to change everything.
[12:58.440 --> 13:05.800]  And in researching, I'm finding a lot of companies
[13:05.800 --> 13:11.160]  that are startup companies in this crypto
[13:11.160 --> 13:19.160]  and crypto, as Tang is getting tangled,
[13:19.160 --> 13:22.280]  in this crypto and blockchain technologies.
[13:22.280 --> 13:25.240]  They're mostly startups and they're mostly not
[13:25.240 --> 13:27.640]  actually operating yet.
[13:27.640 --> 13:32.640]  They're still in a theoretical and design stage.
[13:32.640 --> 13:38.400]  But when they begin coming online, everything will change.
[13:38.400 --> 13:40.440]  Right now, you get on your computer
[13:40.440 --> 13:48.280]  and you log on to a server to ever host your internet service.
[13:48.280 --> 13:52.200]  And this server is a relatively large computer.
[13:52.200 --> 13:56.280]  And it feeds information out to all of its users.
[13:56.280 --> 13:58.920]  And if you need some information that's
[13:58.920 --> 14:06.840]  on a system in, say, Shanghai, well, your server
[14:06.840 --> 14:09.760]  will contact another server who will contact another server
[14:09.760 --> 14:12.520]  and they'll eventually get to that server in Shanghai.
[14:12.520 --> 14:15.320]  And that server will serve up the information you need
[14:15.320 --> 14:18.480]  and they'll feed it back to you.
[14:18.480 --> 14:24.440]  At each step along the way, your information goes on to a stack.
[14:24.440 --> 14:26.640]  And the computer will feed out information
[14:26.640 --> 14:28.680]  from the top of the stack.
[14:28.680 --> 14:33.040]  Your call to the system will go on the bottom of the stack.
[14:33.040 --> 14:35.880]  And it feeds out to its individual users
[14:35.880 --> 14:38.240]  until it gets to you.
[14:38.240 --> 14:42.840]  Well, each step along the way, each server
[14:42.840 --> 14:45.640]  that it has to contact puts you on a stack.
[14:45.640 --> 14:48.120]  So the further you are your way, the more stacks
[14:48.120 --> 14:52.160]  you go through, the more delay you have.
[14:52.160 --> 15:01.200]  This new blockchain technology has the capacity
[15:01.200 --> 15:04.440]  to eliminate the servers.
[15:04.440 --> 15:10.160]  There are millions of computers all over the world
[15:10.160 --> 15:13.680]  with more hard drive space than they need.
[15:13.680 --> 15:16.520]  Hard drive space has gotten relatively cheap
[15:16.520 --> 15:20.240]  and we don't want to run out so we always buy more than we need.
[15:20.240 --> 15:23.360]  There's this massive amount of storage space
[15:23.360 --> 15:26.560]  all over the planet in people's machines
[15:26.560 --> 15:28.040]  and they're not using them.
[15:28.040 --> 15:31.160]  With this new technology everybody,
[15:31.160 --> 15:35.160]  everybody's machine who decides to participate
[15:35.160 --> 15:38.840]  and open up their excess space to the internet
[15:38.840 --> 15:42.640]  will become a part of the internet.
[15:42.640 --> 15:45.800]  So that when I put in a call for my information,
[15:45.800 --> 15:49.600]  the blockchain ledger technology allows
[15:49.600 --> 15:54.400]  me to take my data and load it up to the web.
[15:54.400 --> 15:58.160]  But instead of loading to a server,
[15:58.160 --> 16:04.600]  it loads to a distributed web.
[16:04.600 --> 16:08.440]  It loads to all the computers around me.
[16:08.440 --> 16:13.200]  It breaks my data apart and loads it up to machines
[16:13.200 --> 16:15.040]  all over the place.
[16:15.040 --> 16:18.360]  And so when I put in a call for data,
[16:18.360 --> 16:24.480]  instead of the data going through a string of servers,
[16:24.480 --> 16:27.160]  it goes out to the local machines around me.
[16:27.160 --> 16:33.400]  And instead of feeding from one machine with a one clock speed
[16:33.400 --> 16:39.640]  and feeding from a stack, so it feeds one client
[16:39.640 --> 16:41.600]  and the next and the next and the next,
[16:41.600 --> 16:43.680]  you've got all these computers all around you
[16:43.680 --> 16:47.560]  that will all feed it to you all at once.
[16:47.560 --> 16:52.840]  So you're not even limited to the single machine's clock speed.
[16:52.840 --> 16:56.160]  Your speed will increase logarithmically.
[16:56.160 --> 16:56.920]  Hang on.
[16:56.920 --> 16:57.800]  We'll be right back.
[17:03.960 --> 17:08.240]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun
[17:08.240 --> 17:11.680]  giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[17:11.680 --> 17:15.320]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[17:15.320 --> 17:18.880]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:18.880 --> 17:22.640]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs
[17:22.640 --> 17:25.640]  is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[17:25.640 --> 17:28.480]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[17:28.480 --> 17:32.240]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101,
[17:32.240 --> 17:34.320]  you get four chances to win.
[17:34.320 --> 17:36.360]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar
[17:36.360 --> 17:38.400]  and get 10 chances to win.
[17:38.400 --> 17:42.960]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[17:42.960 --> 17:45.720]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network,
[17:45.720 --> 17:49.080]  support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best
[17:49.080 --> 17:52.080]  quality programming on talk radio today.
[17:52.080 --> 17:55.280]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[17:55.280 --> 18:00.720]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:00.720 --> 18:03.840]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls,
[18:03.840 --> 18:05.800]  letters, or even losses?
[18:05.800 --> 18:09.560]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mirris proven method.
[18:09.560 --> 18:12.320]  Michael Mirris has won six cases in federal court
[18:12.320 --> 18:15.200]  against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:15.200 --> 18:17.920]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English
[18:17.920 --> 18:21.320]  on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.320 --> 18:25.040]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons?
[18:25.040 --> 18:27.080]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:27.080 --> 18:29.680]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports?
[18:29.680 --> 18:31.600]  How to turn the financial tables on them
[18:31.600 --> 18:34.360]  and make them pay you to go away?
[18:34.360 --> 18:37.280]  The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution
[18:37.280 --> 18:39.160]  for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.160 --> 18:41.560]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.560 --> 18:44.960]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:44.960 --> 18:47.240]  and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner,
[18:47.240 --> 18:50.040]  or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[18:50.040 --> 18:56.680]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[18:56.680 --> 19:01.360]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:01.360 --> 19:05.840]  You're listening to the logosradionetwork.
[19:05.840 --> 19:10.320]  Logosradionetwork.com.
[19:10.320 --> 19:12.000]  Recorded!
[19:42.000 --> 19:56.480]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton with LaRidio, and we were talking about what's coming with
[19:56.480 --> 20:00.760]  this new distributed web technology.
[20:00.760 --> 20:09.400]  The server-based web will begin to disappear and it will be replaced with a distributed
[20:09.400 --> 20:13.800]  web where everybody who uses the web becomes a part of the web.
[20:13.800 --> 20:20.760]  Now, this is the way the web was originally when it was first created, but technology
[20:20.760 --> 20:26.960]  didn't support this in large numbers, that's why they had to go to servers.
[20:26.960 --> 20:33.000]  But now the technology's increased so we can go back to a distributed web.
[20:33.000 --> 20:39.760]  And with blockchain technology, this is what blockchain and cryptocurrency does is give
[20:39.760 --> 20:47.240]  you an almost uncrackable web.
[20:47.240 --> 20:54.440]  The crypto technology is so massive that it's almost impossible for someone to crack them.
[20:54.440 --> 20:55.440]  That's not impossible.
[20:55.440 --> 21:02.360]  If somebody comes up with a well-functioning quantum computer, they may be able to push
[21:02.360 --> 21:07.080]  hard enough to crack the system, but it would cost so much to do it, they would have to
[21:07.080 --> 21:09.480]  have a really good reason.
[21:09.480 --> 21:14.600]  These normal hackers that's been cracking in everybody's systems, that better be gone.
[21:14.600 --> 21:22.240]  So you have a safe way to use the web to put your information on the web, and you have
[21:22.240 --> 21:28.720]  a blistering fast way of pulling it back down.
[21:28.720 --> 21:39.680]  And by using the blockchain methodologies, we move money handling into the cloud.
[21:39.680 --> 21:49.040]  It almost eliminates the accounting that goes on in most large companies because the way
[21:49.040 --> 22:00.200]  these transactions take place in the cloud, each transaction goes through a smart contract
[22:00.200 --> 22:07.480]  that instructs it on how to do all of the accounting that needs to be done is done in
[22:07.480 --> 22:09.600]  the transaction itself.
[22:09.600 --> 22:16.760]  So it virtually eliminates accounting and it creates an online ledger that absolutely
[22:16.760 --> 22:19.120]  cannot be changed.
[22:19.120 --> 22:26.480]  So you can't go in and bezel, you can't change the numbers, you can't fudge.
[22:26.480 --> 22:32.680]  The ultimate outcome of that will be is it will take the primary tool that big government
[22:32.680 --> 22:40.280]  uses and has always used to control the population, and that is control of the money.
[22:40.280 --> 22:45.280]  It'll take it away from the governments and the banks and put it in the cloud.
[22:45.280 --> 22:51.360]  The cloud is outside any particular government.
[22:51.360 --> 22:56.840]  It will dramatically change the way that governments interact with the public.
[22:56.840 --> 23:02.680]  It will dramatically change the kind of control the public has over the government.
[23:02.680 --> 23:07.080]  Everything's going to change here, and the real point is everything's going to change.
[23:07.080 --> 23:11.360]  You might look at cryptocurrency.
[23:11.360 --> 23:20.280]  Now I know cryptocurrency is a beast to understand because it's not like anything we already
[23:20.280 --> 23:21.280]  know.
[23:21.280 --> 23:29.120]  You have to almost start from scratch and throw out everything you think you know about accounting
[23:29.120 --> 23:31.960]  and currencies.
[23:31.960 --> 23:37.520]  And look at cryptocurrencies from a whole different perspective, takes a while to wrap your head
[23:37.520 --> 23:38.520]  around it.
[23:38.520 --> 23:50.080]  This is one of those times where we have a lot of basic technology companies coming
[23:50.080 --> 23:55.640]  online that will be the apples of the future.
[23:55.640 --> 24:00.960]  So if you have any funds to invest, you might want to look at cryptocurrency and look hard
[24:00.960 --> 24:09.680]  at it because we are at that point where people were when they knew Steve Jobs, and I forget
[24:09.680 --> 24:14.120]  the other guy's names when they started Apple, when they had a single office and a couple
[24:14.120 --> 24:15.120]  of desks.
[24:15.120 --> 24:20.920]  These companies that are putting this infrastructure together are like that right now.
[24:20.920 --> 24:25.000]  They're just putting it all together and getting ready to launch.
[24:25.000 --> 24:27.920]  So you might take a good look at cryptocurrencies.
[24:27.920 --> 24:31.400]  That's all I'm going to say on that subject because if you want to know more about it,
[24:31.400 --> 24:36.040]  you can listen to the archive from last night we went into this in much more detail.
[24:36.040 --> 24:41.680]  Okay, now we're going to go to our call boards, going to Tina in California.
[24:41.680 --> 24:42.680]  Hello Tina.
[24:42.680 --> 24:43.680]  Hello.
[24:43.680 --> 24:44.680]  How are you?
[24:44.680 --> 24:45.680]  I am well.
[24:45.680 --> 24:53.440]  You were on last night and we didn't get to the question you wanted to ask.
[24:53.440 --> 24:57.280]  We were talking about this crypto technology stuff.
[24:57.280 --> 25:00.840]  So what do you have for us today?
[25:00.840 --> 25:07.200]  Well one thing I really need to talk to you off the air because there's something that's
[25:07.200 --> 25:12.280]  come up that's very important that I think you might really like, but I'm not allowed
[25:12.280 --> 25:15.200]  to talk about it or send it in an email.
[25:15.200 --> 25:20.280]  So if you can contact me at some time soon, I will explain it.
[25:20.280 --> 25:22.760]  It'll take about 10 to 15 minutes.
[25:22.760 --> 25:23.760]  Okay.
[25:23.760 --> 25:33.720]  So the one question I want to ask tonight is when a state has a vexatious litigant statute
[25:33.720 --> 25:40.160]  like California does and the bank tried to label me a vexatious litigant a couple of
[25:40.160 --> 25:46.720]  years ago, but I ended up having to hire an attorney and not that I wanted to, but it
[25:46.720 --> 25:49.640]  stopped the vexatious litigant issue.
[25:49.640 --> 25:56.920]  And if I need to file anything else, they will absolutely file that vexatious litigant
[25:56.920 --> 26:02.400]  and because of the California rules, they'll get it put through.
[26:02.400 --> 26:10.840]  Isn't that a denial of due process of access to the court to have that thing?
[26:10.840 --> 26:14.360]  The courts have carved out an exception.
[26:14.360 --> 26:17.520]  Now there are a set of rules to vexatious litigant.
[26:17.520 --> 26:26.040]  You will have to have filed more than three suits and those suits will have had to have
[26:26.040 --> 26:31.720]  been ruled frivolous without foundation.
[26:31.720 --> 26:36.680]  It's not just as you lost three times.
[26:36.680 --> 26:37.680]  Okay.
[26:37.680 --> 26:44.080]  Your suits had to be ruled as frivolous.
[26:44.080 --> 26:45.080]  Okay.
[26:45.080 --> 26:53.360]  So they might file it and if they do, I would suggest the first thing you do is bar, grieve
[26:53.360 --> 26:57.400]  them and then you file for sanctions against them and turn it back on them.
[26:57.400 --> 27:06.600]  They're trying to poison your will and return to favor.
[27:06.600 --> 27:07.600]  Okay.
[27:07.600 --> 27:23.600]  When you file an appeal and the appeal court says, well, we don't think you're indigent
[27:23.600 --> 27:27.280]  and so you need to pay the fee or we won't hear it and even if you pay the fee, we may
[27:27.280 --> 27:28.840]  not hear it.
[27:28.840 --> 27:34.160]  And by the way, we deem your appeal frivolous.
[27:34.160 --> 27:39.000]  And how can they decide I'm not indigent when other courts have decided I am?
[27:39.000 --> 27:42.680]  How do they get to make that decision?
[27:42.680 --> 27:47.760]  That's something that would be particular to California.
[27:47.760 --> 27:55.880]  In Texas, once you're declared indigent by a lower court, it becomes restjudicata and
[27:55.880 --> 28:01.280]  a higher court may not revisit that determination and you should certainly raise that issue
[28:01.280 --> 28:06.560]  with this court that it is preempting the lower court.
[28:06.560 --> 28:07.560]  Okay.
[28:07.560 --> 28:11.560]  That's good to know.
[28:11.560 --> 28:16.160]  I think they just didn't want to hear it and they just wanted to find an excuse because
[28:16.160 --> 28:22.120]  it was, you know, the banks who were going, I was going against.
[28:22.120 --> 28:29.240]  So it's hard to get the screen to pick something up, but you can certainly appeal that ruling
[28:29.240 --> 28:36.560]  it because the ruling sounds like it would be a ruling that would disturb very well-structured
[28:36.560 --> 28:38.560]  and long-standing law.
[28:38.560 --> 28:39.560]  Okay.
[28:39.560 --> 28:45.360]  If the appeals court can decide that they don't believe you're indigent just because
[28:45.360 --> 28:51.720]  they decide that, then that becomes a way to deny due process.
[28:51.720 --> 28:52.720]  Yes.
[28:52.720 --> 28:59.480]  Can I claim against the appeal pellets' judges?
[28:59.480 --> 29:04.880]  If the law doesn't support their ability to do that, file criminally against each one
[29:04.880 --> 29:11.080]  of them and a judicial conduct complaint against each one of them, these guys got lots of political
[29:11.080 --> 29:17.240]  enemies and you'll start producing cannon fodder for their political enemies.
[29:17.240 --> 29:23.200]  Now, lawyers would never do that to an appeal pellet court judge, but you're not a lawyer
[29:23.200 --> 29:26.320]  and you don't care if they're upset at you.
[29:26.320 --> 29:31.400]  They're going to throw you under the bus anyway, so you might as well sting them good and
[29:31.400 --> 29:36.520]  give them a reason to start paying attention and follow the law.
[29:36.520 --> 29:37.520]  Okay.
[29:37.520 --> 29:38.520]  Good.
[29:38.520 --> 29:39.520]  That sounds great.
[29:39.520 --> 29:41.520]  I will do that.
[29:41.520 --> 29:42.520]  Okay.
[29:42.520 --> 29:43.520]  Thank you, Tina.
[29:43.520 --> 29:44.520]  We're about to go to break.
[29:44.520 --> 29:47.680]  This is Randy Kelton, wheel of law radio, Leslie in Pennsylvania.
[29:47.680 --> 29:50.680]  We will pick you up when we come back on the other side.
[29:50.680 --> 29:53.400]  John, Tim, I see you all there.
[29:53.400 --> 29:55.400]  This is Randy Kelton, wheel of law radio.
[29:55.400 --> 29:57.400]  I call it number 512-646-1984.
[29:57.400 --> 30:00.400]  We will be right back.
[30:00.400 --> 30:09.240]  What do you do when a bird with a broken wing waddles into your oven and refuses to leave?
[30:09.240 --> 30:14.520]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht, back with a tale of how one Austrian couple faced exactly that
[30:14.520 --> 30:15.520]  dilemma.
[30:15.520 --> 30:16.520]  Next.
[30:16.520 --> 30:18.560]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.560 --> 30:22.160]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.160 --> 30:27.160]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.160 --> 30:28.660]  So protect your rights.
[30:28.660 --> 30:32.480]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.480 --> 30:34.920]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[30:34.920 --> 30:40.520]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[30:40.520 --> 30:42.240]  Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.240 --> 30:44.240]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.240 --> 30:50.640]  Here's a love story from Austria that involves a taxidermist named Bertle Reiderer, his wife
[30:50.640 --> 30:53.240]  army and a pigeon named Susie.
[30:53.240 --> 30:57.320]  It started the day Bertle found Susie with a broken wing by the side of the road.
[30:57.320 --> 31:01.320]  He took her to a vet, then home, then set the bird up in the garage.
[31:01.320 --> 31:05.920]  But on Christmas Day, Susie waddled into the kitchen, hopped into the oven, and refused
[31:05.920 --> 31:06.920]  to come out.
[31:06.920 --> 31:11.440]  Rather than make pigeons stew, the couple adopted Susie and allowed the flightless bird
[31:11.440 --> 31:13.640]  to make a home in their oven.
[31:13.640 --> 31:15.280]  That was 17 years ago.
[31:15.280 --> 31:19.760]  Sure, it makes cooking tricky, they say, but their kitchen is all the warmer for it.
[31:19.760 --> 31:24.680]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:24.680 --> 31:35.080]  Did you know there are 3 million edible food plants on earth and none have the nutritional
[31:35.080 --> 31:36.760]  value of a hemp plant?
[31:36.760 --> 31:39.640]  Hempusa.org offers you hemp protein powder.
[31:39.640 --> 31:45.200]  It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100% gluten-free.
[31:45.200 --> 31:50.360]  Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein, and feeds the body,
[31:50.360 --> 31:56.760]  the nutrients it needs, call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder seeds and oil can do
[31:56.760 --> 32:00.000]  for you, only at Hempusa.org.
[32:00.000 --> 32:05.040]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar.
[32:05.040 --> 32:08.720]  In today's America, we live in an us against them society, and if we, the people, are ever
[32:08.720 --> 32:12.040]  going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our home
[32:12.040 --> 32:13.040]  rights.
[32:13.040 --> 32:15.880]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to
[32:15.880 --> 32:20.080]  act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law,
[32:20.080 --> 32:24.000]  and the courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve
[32:24.000 --> 32:25.520]  our rights through due process.
[32:25.520 --> 32:29.360]  Former Sheriff's Deputy, Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the
[32:29.360 --> 32:33.120]  most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process
[32:33.120 --> 32:35.200]  is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.200 --> 32:39.480]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and
[32:39.480 --> 32:40.840]  portering your copy today.
[32:40.840 --> 32:44.160]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code,
[32:44.160 --> 32:48.600]  The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research
[32:48.600 --> 32:50.920]  documents and other useful resource material.
[32:50.920 --> 32:54.920]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.920 --> 32:59.920]  Order your copy today and together we can have a free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.920 --> 33:09.920]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:09.920 --> 33:26.920]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm gonna solve them to the end of the momentum, prosecute them.
[33:26.920 --> 33:27.920]  Okay.
[33:27.920 --> 33:54.920]  We are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're going to Ms. Leslie in Pennsylvania.
[33:54.920 --> 33:56.920]  Ms. Leslie, how are you?
[33:56.920 --> 33:57.920]  Fine.
[33:57.920 --> 33:58.920]  Just got back to you, ma'am.
[33:58.920 --> 34:02.920]  I was gonna say she's not in Pennsylvania anymore.
[34:02.920 --> 34:08.640]  She's down there where it never gets hot and it never gets dusty.
[34:08.640 --> 34:12.920]  Did you get any of that dust storm that hit Phoenix?
[34:12.920 --> 34:13.920]  No.
[34:13.920 --> 34:20.280]  Well, the day before we left for Pennsylvania, it hit here, but it was a little bit different.
[34:20.280 --> 34:26.760]  It wasn't the same, but it was part of that storm, yeah, but we didn't get it as bad.
[34:26.760 --> 34:36.960]  But anyway, the reason I'm calling, Texas Government Code 51.903, Action on Fortunes
[34:36.960 --> 34:38.960]  Leaning on Property.
[34:38.960 --> 34:41.960]  You there?
[34:41.960 --> 34:42.960]  51.903.
[34:42.960 --> 34:46.960]  Yes, I'm familiar with that.
[34:46.960 --> 34:50.760]  That's Texas Local Government Code.
[34:50.760 --> 34:51.760]  Right.
[34:51.760 --> 35:02.280]  Ms. Debra filed that particular motion with the court, and the next day the court set
[35:02.280 --> 35:03.280]  a record request.
[35:03.280 --> 35:10.120]  I don't know where, but it must have been to the recorder of these, I would imagine.
[35:10.120 --> 35:12.360]  But we haven't heard anything else since then.
[35:12.360 --> 35:13.760]  It's been the month.
[35:13.760 --> 35:14.760]  Okay.
[35:14.760 --> 35:17.760]  That is a declaratory judgment suit.
[35:17.760 --> 35:18.760]  Yes.
[35:18.760 --> 35:21.360]  And they didn't want to do anything for it.
[35:21.360 --> 35:27.960]  If anybody wants to do a declaratory judgment suit, you could go to 51.903, Texas Local
[35:27.960 --> 35:35.480]  Government Code, and they have the form for a declaratory judgment suit.
[35:35.480 --> 35:39.840]  Declariatory judgment suits him properly in the state and in effect.
[35:39.840 --> 35:48.160]  A declaratory judgment suit doesn't ask for any harm, any damages, no attorney fees, nothing.
[35:48.160 --> 35:56.120]  It asks the court to rule on the rights of the parties, and what that means in the real
[35:56.120 --> 36:02.720]  world is you ask the court to rule on a point of fact and law.
[36:02.720 --> 36:09.320]  It used to be that you could not invoke the jurisdiction of a court unless you brought
[36:09.320 --> 36:14.320]  a harm, you brought a true controversy.
[36:14.320 --> 36:21.560]  There had to be an injured party, a declaratory judgment suit is a special case.
[36:21.560 --> 36:24.600]  You don't have to have an injured party.
[36:24.600 --> 36:31.440]  You can ask the court to rule on the rights of the parties, and in this case, 51.901
[36:31.440 --> 36:43.200]  suit is a petition of declaratory judgment to make a determination of the validity of
[36:43.200 --> 36:47.720]  a document filed in the public record.
[36:47.720 --> 37:00.720]  13.001 says that any document not properly acknowledged or proven and filed in the public
[37:00.720 --> 37:03.320]  record is void as to the holder.
[37:03.320 --> 37:08.360]  Okay, so you don't have to file anything in the record, but this statute says if you
[37:08.360 --> 37:13.400]  don't, then you can take your claim and use it for toilet paper.
[37:13.400 --> 37:19.680]  Okay, 51.901C says that any document filed in the record by someone who doesn't have
[37:19.680 --> 37:26.000]  a document filed in the record showing that they have power to file something affecting
[37:26.000 --> 37:30.840]  title is construed to be fraudulent.
[37:30.840 --> 37:39.440]  So you use 903 to challenge a document you maintain was improperly filed under 901.
[37:39.440 --> 37:43.040]  Does that make sense, Ms. Leslie?
[37:43.040 --> 37:46.480]  Oh, yeah, it makes lots of sense.
[37:46.480 --> 37:51.480]  And the fact is the very next day they asked for, they put in the docket that the records
[37:51.480 --> 37:56.560]  were requested, but they didn't say anything more than that, and we haven't heard anything
[37:56.560 --> 37:58.560]  in the docket.
[37:58.560 --> 38:03.440]  Did the opposition, did the other side file an opposition?
[38:03.440 --> 38:08.680]  No, and here's why.
[38:08.680 --> 38:13.120]  For some reason, the clerk put the opposition as country-wide homeroom.
[38:13.120 --> 38:18.160]  Wait, say that again.
[38:18.160 --> 38:31.680]  The assignor of the deed of trust with country-wide home loans, and they put that as the response
[38:31.680 --> 38:38.040]  of the party, and not the person that filed the forged document in the record.
[38:38.040 --> 38:39.440]  Oh, okay.
[38:39.440 --> 38:41.560]  So did...
[38:41.560 --> 38:43.560]  So country-wide did not respond?
[38:43.560 --> 38:44.560]  That's not...
[38:44.560 --> 38:46.560]  They've been dead for...
[38:46.560 --> 38:47.560]  Okay.
[38:47.560 --> 38:48.560]  Okay.
[38:48.560 --> 38:53.440]  Jock will in the chambers.
[38:53.440 --> 39:05.320]  Any live pleading, any facts in the live pleadings not challenged become formal judicial
[39:05.320 --> 39:06.520]  admissions.
[39:06.520 --> 39:21.920]  And then PECVPEC, a judicially admitted fact may not be challenged, and the party may not
[39:21.920 --> 39:24.520]  bring evidence to refute it.
[39:24.520 --> 39:29.760]  Done deal, you have to write some re-judgment, have a petition for some re-judgment.
[39:29.760 --> 39:37.000]  Oh, you mean after 30 days, it's not done, because I told her I had to wait two months
[39:37.000 --> 39:43.400]  and give her a chance to find out what this record request was that they would or so.
[39:43.400 --> 39:45.400]  You know.
[39:45.400 --> 39:46.400]  Sum re-judgment.
[39:46.400 --> 39:50.120]  You go to the court with summary judgment, you take it to the clerk, and you have the
[39:50.120 --> 39:52.680]  clerk look in the record.
[39:52.680 --> 39:59.320]  The record shows I filed this petition for declaratory judgment on this day.
[39:59.320 --> 40:00.320]  Not the days.
[40:00.320 --> 40:08.720]  When the days click past 30, you have a right to summary judgment, sign it, the clerk can
[40:08.720 --> 40:09.720]  sign it.
[40:09.720 --> 40:10.720]  Oh, okay.
[40:10.720 --> 40:11.720]  All right.
[40:11.720 --> 40:15.800]  I'll have to find a form for that then.
[40:15.800 --> 40:16.800]  Now...
[40:16.800 --> 40:17.800]  Yeah.
[40:17.800 --> 40:22.600]  And then the other party can come back and challenge it, but in this case, if the party
[40:22.600 --> 40:29.400]  comes back and challenges it, challenges it run, because they had to raise from the dead
[40:29.400 --> 40:32.400]  to do that.
[40:32.400 --> 40:33.400]  Yeah.
[40:33.400 --> 40:34.400]  Another question.
[40:34.400 --> 40:43.840]  Now, because this assignment was assigned in 2004, and there have been assignments
[40:43.840 --> 40:48.080]  after that, right?
[40:48.080 --> 40:55.440]  If good doesn't do her to have this assignment vacated, or...
[40:55.440 --> 41:00.080]  Well, you look at the chain of title.
[41:00.080 --> 41:01.080]  Okay.
[41:01.080 --> 41:02.080]  Okay.
[41:02.080 --> 41:10.920]  Because these people that were assigned in 2004 filed foreclosure against that paragraph.
[41:10.920 --> 41:11.920]  Okay.
[41:11.920 --> 41:19.120]  So, who was the assignor, who did the assignment?
[41:19.120 --> 41:25.920]  Countrywide, I don't know, it was an agency, Orion.
[41:25.920 --> 41:26.920]  Okay.
[41:26.920 --> 41:27.920]  Did Orion...
[41:27.920 --> 41:28.920]  Okay.
[41:28.920 --> 41:33.440]  Orion did the...
[41:33.440 --> 41:43.120]  Is there anything in the record that shows that Orion is a proper holder of the security
[41:43.120 --> 41:44.120]  instrument?
[41:44.120 --> 41:45.120]  No.
[41:45.120 --> 41:54.640]  Then that gets a 51901C, that gets a 13.001 challenge, I'm sorry, no it doesn't, it gets
[41:54.640 --> 41:59.200]  a 51901C challenge.
[41:59.200 --> 42:04.040]  This guy filed this document in the record, who the heck is he?
[42:04.040 --> 42:05.040]  Right.
[42:05.040 --> 42:12.680]  Where did he get authority to file a document affecting real property?
[42:12.680 --> 42:13.680]  Right.
[42:13.680 --> 42:20.000]  Under 901C, this is presumed to be fraud, so you file that as a petition for declaratory
[42:20.000 --> 42:21.000]  judgment.
[42:21.000 --> 42:22.000]  Okay.
[42:22.000 --> 42:28.800]  Now, the beginning of this is Countrywide was the original lender, and Deborah had
[42:28.800 --> 42:37.880]  gotten all of the assignments from 2007 to 2012 adjudicated in the federal court.
[42:37.880 --> 42:48.680]  In 2014, an assignment was recorded that was dated 2004 from Countrywide, home loans again,
[42:48.680 --> 42:55.800]  to this party that's foreclosing, SLS is doing the foreclosing to the services.
[42:55.800 --> 43:01.400]  Now, when you look at the document, it's an actual forgery, you can tell by looking
[43:01.400 --> 43:02.400]  at it.
[43:02.400 --> 43:06.840]  The recording information occurred after the date on the assignment.
[43:06.840 --> 43:11.120]  That's okay, they can do that.
[43:11.120 --> 43:16.000]  Okay, that's not a deal killer.
[43:16.000 --> 43:22.800]  You can make the assignment, and there is no duty to record that in this Accounting Recorder
[43:22.800 --> 43:23.800]  Office.
[43:23.800 --> 43:25.800]  No, that's not what I mean.
[43:25.800 --> 43:36.000]  I mean that the recording of the Deed of Trust occurred after the assignment of the Deed
[43:36.000 --> 43:42.480]  of Trust, and it references the recording of the Deed of Trust that occurred after that
[43:42.480 --> 43:43.480]  date.
[43:43.480 --> 43:48.480]  Oh, okay, that makes more sense.
[43:48.480 --> 43:52.800]  So they had precognition.
[43:52.800 --> 43:55.080]  Yeah.
[43:55.080 --> 44:01.320]  When they created this assignment, they knew that some years down the road.
[44:01.320 --> 44:04.880]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[44:04.880 --> 44:09.280]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[44:09.280 --> 44:12.800]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high
[44:12.800 --> 44:14.760]  quality coins and precious metals.
[44:14.760 --> 44:18.800]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[44:18.800 --> 44:23.360]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers
[44:23.360 --> 44:24.360]  and journalists.
[44:24.360 --> 44:27.320]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[44:27.320 --> 44:31.600]  In addition, we carry popular young Jebedee products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and
[44:31.600 --> 44:32.600]  Pollen Burst.
[44:32.600 --> 44:37.440]  We also offer one-world-way mountain house storeable foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition
[44:37.440 --> 44:39.600]  at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[44:39.600 --> 44:43.520]  We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept big coins as payment.
[44:43.520 --> 44:46.560]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[44:46.560 --> 44:51.520]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[44:51.520 --> 44:54.680]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[44:54.680 --> 45:01.320]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[45:01.320 --> 45:04.520]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.520 --> 45:11.280]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[45:11.280 --> 45:15.280]  that will show you how in 24 hours, you death by step.
[45:15.280 --> 45:19.440]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.440 --> 45:23.040]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.040 --> 45:28.320]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.320 --> 45:34.880]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.880 --> 45:39.360]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[45:39.360 --> 45:43.720]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.720 --> 45:49.840]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.840 --> 45:52.400]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.400 --> 46:14.880]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:14.880 --> 46:32.760]  That's the end of this video.
[46:32.760 --> 46:40.640]  Thank you.
[46:40.640 --> 46:46.640]  I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons
[46:46.640 --> 46:52.640]  I give my message out to anyone in the shot and distance
[46:52.640 --> 46:57.640]  I vote for bravery and against slavery, showing resistance
[46:57.640 --> 47:02.640]  First I'm crawling, then I'm walking, then I start strutting
[47:02.640 --> 47:18.640]  I'm just so glad to make my living, pushing buttons
[47:18.640 --> 47:21.640]  Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton with our radio
[47:21.640 --> 47:27.640]  And we're talking to Leslie in Pennsylvania and apologize for the delay coming in
[47:27.640 --> 47:34.640]  There we go, okay, I'm running all the boards myself tonight
[47:34.640 --> 47:38.640]  And I was sitting here waiting for the producer to bring me in
[47:38.640 --> 47:43.640]  I forgot he's gone, I had to do it myself
[47:43.640 --> 47:47.640]  Okay, now about this fraudulent lien
[47:47.640 --> 47:53.640]  Yes, when she goes and gets a summary judgment, how will that affect the foreclosure?
[47:53.640 --> 48:01.640]  Well that will stop all, it becomes an incontrovertible fact
[48:01.640 --> 48:19.640]  And if the assignment was a basic document on which the plaintiff relied for a standing
[48:19.640 --> 48:23.640]  Then it goes to challenge subject matter jurisdiction of the court
[48:23.640 --> 48:28.640]  Challenge subject matter jurisdiction may be brought at any time no matter how remote in history
[48:28.640 --> 48:30.640]  Okay
[48:30.640 --> 48:40.640]  We just got a ruling in our favor on a petition for rid of mandamus on subject matter jurisdiction
[48:40.640 --> 48:43.640]  And the court threw them out
[48:43.640 --> 48:47.640]  Court of Appeals tossed them, yahoo
[48:47.640 --> 48:51.640]  This is what I have a problem with right now
[48:51.640 --> 48:55.640]  The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania said they will not hear my case
[48:55.640 --> 49:00.640]  Because they said the appellate court had no jurisdiction to hear my case
[49:00.640 --> 49:07.640]  Because they said the 1925 report was not timely filed
[49:07.640 --> 49:10.640]  Then go to the feds
[49:10.640 --> 49:14.640]  Oh wait, you're in the fed already? You're still in the state?
[49:14.640 --> 49:17.640]  I'm still in the state
[49:17.640 --> 49:20.640]  Then okay, you still have the fed option
[49:20.640 --> 49:30.640]  So no way, they said, okay, they're saying the court had, you were the plaintiff and they were saying that because
[49:30.640 --> 49:32.640]  I'm dependent
[49:32.640 --> 49:35.640]  But I was the appellate, appellant
[49:35.640 --> 49:40.640]  Because they found to foreclose on my property but they didn't have any jurisdiction
[49:40.640 --> 49:44.640]  They didn't add enough people to the case, they didn't add any assistance to the court
[49:44.640 --> 49:46.640]  No, wait a minute, wait a minute
[49:46.640 --> 49:51.640]  You said the Supreme Court said they would not hear your case because they didn't have jurisdiction
[49:51.640 --> 49:55.640]  Because of the late 1925
[49:55.640 --> 50:00.640]  But if they didn't have jurisdiction to hear the foreclosure, see what difference does it make?
[50:00.640 --> 50:03.640]  Yeah, if...
[50:03.640 --> 50:05.640]  Wait a minute
[50:05.640 --> 50:11.640]  They're saying they didn't have jurisdiction to hear your claim
[50:11.640 --> 50:12.640]  Yes
[50:12.640 --> 50:16.640]  Oh, okay, they can do that
[50:16.640 --> 50:20.640]  And this is what happened in our case
[50:20.640 --> 50:29.640]  We're saying that the other side said that we challenged subject matter jurisdiction but we made a counter claim
[50:29.640 --> 50:31.640]  So we admitted to jurisdiction
[50:31.640 --> 50:33.640]  And we said that's nonsense
[50:33.640 --> 50:36.640]  We didn't say we didn't have jurisdiction
[50:36.640 --> 50:39.640]  We said you didn't have jurisdiction
[50:39.640 --> 50:43.640]  So one party can have it and the other party not have it
[50:43.640 --> 50:47.640]  So they're saying you didn't have jurisdiction to claim
[50:47.640 --> 50:52.640]  You didn't have standing to bring your claim or something was wrong with your claim
[50:52.640 --> 50:57.640]  So that it did not invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the court
[50:57.640 --> 51:00.640]  Okay, and the Supreme refused to hear it
[51:00.640 --> 51:06.640]  And that's probably correct
[51:06.640 --> 51:08.640]  Well, this is the problem
[51:08.640 --> 51:14.640]  In the foreclosure court, there was a forged assignment of mortgage
[51:14.640 --> 51:20.640]  The assignee had in documentation said they had nothing whatsoever to do with that assignment
[51:20.640 --> 51:22.640]  Number one
[51:22.640 --> 51:29.640]  Number two, they didn't add indispensable parties which is grounds for immediate dismissal for lack of jurisdiction
[51:29.640 --> 51:32.640]  They failed to join Finning Bay
[51:32.640 --> 51:37.640]  They failed to join other owners of the property
[51:37.640 --> 51:41.640]  How are you in the state court?
[51:41.640 --> 51:44.640]  Because all foreclosures are in the state court
[51:44.640 --> 51:50.640]  Oh, okay, so now you can sue for wrongful foreclosure in the federal court
[51:50.640 --> 51:54.640]  Yeah, one more thing I have to do first
[51:54.640 --> 51:58.640]  I have another mortgage on the property
[51:58.640 --> 52:01.640]  Remember I told you about that?
[52:01.640 --> 52:06.640]  It's owned by a corporate soul
[52:06.640 --> 52:14.640]  And the other mortgage has put it in...the mortgagee had put it in a trust
[52:14.640 --> 52:16.640]  Assigned it to a trust
[52:16.640 --> 52:24.640]  Now what the attorney's going to do is we're going to get a deed of in lieu of foreclosure to the corporate soul trust
[52:24.640 --> 52:27.640]  Where they're the trustee
[52:27.640 --> 52:33.640]  The lawyer is my lawyer is going to file a quiet title against the bank
[52:33.640 --> 52:41.640]  An emotion to avoid the order because they weren't joined to the foreclosure
[52:41.640 --> 52:45.640]  Wait, because they weren't what to the foreclosure?
[52:45.640 --> 52:47.640]  Joined
[52:47.640 --> 52:49.640]  Oh, okay
[52:49.640 --> 52:52.640]  They would have lost all their interest if they were foreclosed
[52:52.640 --> 52:59.640]  So if we give them a deed of in lieu, the attorney can file a quiet title and motion to avoid the foreclosure
[52:59.640 --> 53:04.640]  Because they didn't have a jurisdiction
[53:04.640 --> 53:07.640]  A jurisdiction can be challenged at any time
[53:07.640 --> 53:11.640]  We couldn't challenge it in the appeal courts because they won't hear us
[53:11.640 --> 53:14.640]  I don't know why
[53:14.640 --> 53:23.640]  Okay, did you file again Steve? Okay, that would take some more detail
[53:23.640 --> 53:28.640]  You don't know why the court wouldn't hear you in the appeals court
[53:28.640 --> 53:31.640]  You're assuming I remember a lot about this that I apparently don't
[53:31.640 --> 53:36.640]  Okay, for some reason when everything gets electronically filed
[53:36.640 --> 53:44.640]  It was mis-filed, the 1925 report was mis-filed and it wasn't caught for a month and that made it late
[53:44.640 --> 53:51.640]  And so the appeals court said we can hear it, you didn't file this 1925 in time
[53:51.640 --> 54:00.640]  So you're saying that the appeals court ruled on incomplete record
[54:00.640 --> 54:04.640]  Because something was mis-filed and wasn't in front of the appeals court, is that correct?
[54:04.640 --> 54:15.640]  They're saying that we waived jurisdiction because we didn't file the 1925, we waived all defenses
[54:15.640 --> 54:17.640]  They don't want to hear you
[54:17.640 --> 54:24.640]  Jurisdiction, explain what they meant by jurisdiction, did they mean venue, jurisdiction or subject matter?
[54:24.640 --> 54:26.640]  Subject matter
[54:26.640 --> 54:30.640]  Subject matter cannot be waived, period
[54:30.640 --> 54:31.640]  Yeah
[54:31.640 --> 54:37.640]  That's a bogus ruling, that should get a motion for, did you do a motion for reconsideration on that issue?
[54:37.640 --> 54:39.640]  Yes
[54:39.640 --> 54:47.640]  Yeah, and then we went for a motion of petition of allocator with the Supreme Court
[54:47.640 --> 54:49.640]  The Supreme Court won't hear it
[54:49.640 --> 54:57.640]  So that creates a absolute precedent in the state of Pennsylvania
[54:57.640 --> 54:59.640]  Yeah
[54:59.640 --> 55:04.640]  That throws out 200 years of subject matter jurisdiction law
[55:04.640 --> 55:08.640]  Yeah
[55:08.640 --> 55:14.640]  That should get an absolute, you get a federal suit
[55:14.640 --> 55:23.640]  I know, my attorney is enough to it, he doesn't, he really doesn't, he would rather go with the quiet title on the mortgagee
[55:23.640 --> 55:27.640]  Well, the quiet title may work if you can get your attention
[55:27.640 --> 55:35.640]  Well, the thing is, is that with a creditor, because we had filed in the record that we rescinded the loan
[55:35.640 --> 55:43.640]  and that we filed the notice of the rescission in the public record twice, once in April and once in December
[55:43.640 --> 55:53.640]  One was a notice of intention to rescind and the other was the final notice of rescission
[55:53.640 --> 55:58.640]  Then they never filed anything in a rejection to it
[55:58.640 --> 56:03.640]  So as far as they were concerned, there was no objection
[56:03.640 --> 56:07.640]  That goes, Jocelyn v. Chambers again
[56:07.640 --> 56:13.640]  It wasn't objected to, they gave formal judicial admission
[56:13.640 --> 56:15.640]  Right
[56:15.640 --> 56:24.640]  So that's the way he's going with that, that there's no reason that the creditor would know that there was a problem with the rescission
[56:24.640 --> 56:34.640]  and that they, you know, in good faith and all that kind of stuff, they, you know, they accepted another mortgage based on the rescission
[56:34.640 --> 56:43.640]  And that was it, because the mortgage was over a year after we sent the final notice of rescission
[56:43.640 --> 56:49.640]  So they would have had a whole year to do anything and they didn't, so
[56:49.640 --> 56:56.640]  So he figures that because of the way Pennsylvania law is that they're not obligated to have anything to do with that mortgage
[56:56.640 --> 57:00.640]  because they had no notice
[57:00.640 --> 57:03.640]  Okay, you're using a pronoun they
[57:03.640 --> 57:15.640]  The new mortgage, the second mortgage company, the Corporate Soul Trust, had no notice that the rescission had a problem
[57:15.640 --> 57:21.640]  that there was a rescission, you know, that the rescission was not accepted or anything, they had no
[57:21.640 --> 57:25.640]  Well, the other party, regardless, is subject to latches
[57:25.640 --> 57:27.640]  Yes
[57:27.640 --> 57:34.640]  They could have made a claim, well, it wasn't within the year of the origination of the note
[57:34.640 --> 57:42.640]  Well, that's a claim they make, they ignore the last provision that allows you to rescind it after foreclosure
[57:42.640 --> 57:47.640]  However, they could have raised that, but that was a statute of limitations issue
[57:47.640 --> 57:55.640]  And a statute of limitations is not a bar, it's an affirmative defense that must be raised, they didn't raise it
[57:55.640 --> 58:00.640]  So you have a right to summary judgment on the issue
[58:00.640 --> 58:08.640]  They had no right to summary judgment in the first place because there was no jurisdiction in the court to begin with
[58:08.640 --> 58:13.640]  You know, they had so much more to bear
[58:13.640 --> 58:16.640]  Okay, hang on, we're about to go to break
[58:16.640 --> 58:23.640]  But this seems like they're creating some really ugly precedents
[58:23.640 --> 58:30.640]  And you might start using those precedents against them, we'll talk about that more when we get back on the other side
[58:30.640 --> 58:37.640]  This is Randy Kelton on the Rule of Law Radio, our calling number 512-646-1984
[58:37.640 --> 58:41.640]  We'll be taking your calls all night, we'll be right back
[58:41.640 --> 58:53.640]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:53.640 --> 59:00.640]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help
[59:00.640 --> 59:05.640]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today
[59:05.640 --> 59:12.640]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life
[59:12.640 --> 59:17.640]  The free books are a three volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life
[59:17.640 --> 59:27.640]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church
[59:27.640 --> 59:40.640]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102
[59:40.640 --> 59:58.640]  Or visit us online at bfa.org
[01:00:11.640 --> 01:00:22.640]  News updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative
[01:00:22.640 --> 01:00:48.640]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22-nounds, silver $16.68-nounds, Texas crude $65.51-barrel, bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum at $420.80, bitcoin cash at $652.90, and finally light coins at $114.34, a crypto coin
[01:00:53.640 --> 01:01:07.640]  Today in History, the year 1968, President Lyndon M. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin
[01:01:07.640 --> 01:01:17.640]  It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in public schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business
[01:01:17.640 --> 01:01:22.640]  Today in History
[01:01:22.640 --> 01:01:49.640]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack on civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which is being blamed on the democratically elected president of Syria Bashar al-Assad by the United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence as of yet
[01:01:49.640 --> 01:01:58.640]  Russia, because they will be coming in nice and new and smart, going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas-killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it
[01:01:58.640 --> 01:02:06.640]  Many in the West, including President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted by Assad and his forces
[01:02:06.640 --> 01:02:29.640]  Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side of the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by western governments, with ISIS being one of the more notorious
[01:02:29.640 --> 01:02:51.640]  center groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels. No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government, which has been fighting terrorists. Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[01:03:29.640 --> 01:03:50.640]  This is Friday, the third day of August 2018, and I'm talking to Leslie from Yuma. I see you're on my machine, is Leslie from Pennsylvania, that's why I keep saying that. We've been talking to Leslie from Pennsylvania for how many years now, Leslie?
[01:03:50.640 --> 01:04:19.640]  Oh, I would say it's 2010. It's been a while. Sorry, it's been a while. Yeah. Okay, so where are we? So now you're filing a petition for declaratory judgment. I don't understand the relationship of the trust and the corporate entity to the mortgage.
[01:04:19.640 --> 01:04:44.640]  The corporate soul is the ministry of my husband, and I started years ago before we even had a mortgage. It was started just about the same time we got married. And then recently, we had an ecclesiastical court get us at order a trust to protect the property of the corporate soul.
[01:04:44.640 --> 01:05:01.640]  So when we had the mortgage, what we did, why we gave a mortgage to the corporate soul was we wanted to change the title to the corporate soul, and we wanted it protected as a, what would you call it, end of life plan?
[01:05:01.640 --> 01:05:27.640]  Because we're old. So what we wanted to do is put our property into the ministry, but we wanted to do it because there in Pennsylvania, they have such high taxes on transfers of property that we figured, well, it's cheaper just to record a mortgage and then do a deed a little for a mortgage of $80, that's about a couple thousand.
[01:05:27.640 --> 01:05:46.640]  So that's why we gave it a deed and loo. And then we started having, not a deed and loo, a mortgage on the property. That was the original plan because we thought that the rescission and all was going to, it was okay. There was no objections to that.
[01:05:46.640 --> 01:06:02.640]  So when we did that, and then recently when we were in the foreclosure court, I said, you know what, we ought to assign it away from the ministry and into a trust. And that's what the court, the ecclesiastical court did for us.
[01:06:02.640 --> 01:06:18.640]  And we assigned it into the, we assigned the mortgage into the ecclesi, into the, into the trust where the ministry is the trustee.
[01:06:18.640 --> 01:06:29.640]  And we have an attorney that's acting as an attorney in fact for the trust, an agent for the corporate soul, so that we're hidden from that.
[01:06:29.640 --> 01:06:34.640]  So did the court ever address the fact that the property wasn't in your name?
[01:06:34.640 --> 01:06:45.640]  No. And they didn't add the other party. That's what I'm saying. It's still, it's still recorded in her name, the mortgages in the name of the trust.
[01:06:45.640 --> 01:07:07.640]  And we're giving them a deed in lieu that, from May, and we filed a deed in lieu and that's getting recorded this week. And then they'll file for the quiet title and to avoid the foreclosure hearing because they didn't add the second mortgager to the foreclosure.
[01:07:07.640 --> 01:07:11.640]  And that puts in beyond statute of limitations.
[01:07:11.640 --> 01:07:13.640]  Yes.
[01:07:13.640 --> 01:07:18.640]  That's probably a really good move because that's exactly what they did to you.
[01:07:18.640 --> 01:07:21.640]  Yeah.
[01:07:21.640 --> 01:07:30.640]  So if they do it to one and not the other, then at least this would give you a good case for the federal court.
[01:07:30.640 --> 01:07:50.640]  Here's another thing. I was in the appeals court in my first quiet title that I filed and they threw it out because I didn't add my husband to the lawsuit because they said it was a necessary party, what store they used, indispensable party, and they 1032B'd me.
[01:07:50.640 --> 01:07:52.640]  That's called a 1032B.
[01:07:52.640 --> 01:08:02.640]  And I went all the way up through the court of appeals in Pennsylvania and they said, no, if he wasn't added, it's an indispensable party. You can't have a quiet title action without adding him.
[01:08:02.640 --> 01:08:17.640]  Then use the court of appeals language in dismissing your claim to move that they dismissed the claim of the foreclosure.
[01:08:17.640 --> 01:08:18.640]  I tried.
[01:08:18.640 --> 01:08:21.640]  And they ignored their own language?
[01:08:21.640 --> 01:08:25.640]  Okay.
[01:08:25.640 --> 01:08:29.640]  It should get criminal charges against these judges.
[01:08:29.640 --> 01:08:31.640]  Yeah, I know.
[01:08:31.640 --> 01:08:40.640]  Okay, in Pennsylvania, you don't have a direct access to a grand jury. However, you do have standing.
[01:08:40.640 --> 01:08:45.640]  And you can push this all the way up through the courts to the Supreme.
[01:08:45.640 --> 01:08:49.640]  You can push it back to the court through a different court of appeals.
[01:08:49.640 --> 01:08:53.640]  Criminal charges against this court of appeals.
[01:08:53.640 --> 01:09:02.640]  You could disqualify this court of appeals and push it to another court of appeals and really drag these judges' names through the mud.
[01:09:02.640 --> 01:09:06.640]  Yes, I'm very, I'm really considering that.
[01:09:06.640 --> 01:09:07.640]  I'm really considering that.
[01:09:07.640 --> 01:09:12.640]  But see, then I have to use an attorney and I need a real brave one because I'm so formal.
[01:09:12.640 --> 01:09:14.640]  No, you don't need an attorney.
[01:09:14.640 --> 01:09:18.640]  You can, you could sharp shoot him from Yuma.
[01:09:18.640 --> 01:09:19.640]  Good.
[01:09:19.640 --> 01:09:20.640]  I'm going to have to try that.
[01:09:20.640 --> 01:09:23.640]  But anyway, so I'm really not concerned so much.
[01:09:23.640 --> 01:09:31.640]  And the way I look at it, well, the worst thing I'll have to do is I'll have to go up there and move everything out of my house, which I really didn't want to do.
[01:09:31.640 --> 01:09:33.640]  That's too much stuff.
[01:09:33.640 --> 01:09:37.640]  But anyway, about the DOT number, I have a question for you.
[01:09:37.640 --> 01:09:39.640]  Okay.
[01:09:39.640 --> 01:09:40.640]  Okay.
[01:09:40.640 --> 01:09:41.640]  I got one.
[01:09:41.640 --> 01:09:45.640]  And I was wondering, is there a reason you put a sign on both sides of your doors?
[01:09:45.640 --> 01:09:51.640]  It's required for commercial, but if you're non-commercial, couldn't a tag in the back of the car be enough?
[01:09:51.640 --> 01:09:53.640]  Yes, absolutely would.
[01:09:53.640 --> 01:09:55.640]  And that's all I had on mind.
[01:09:55.640 --> 01:09:59.640]  And different states are different in what they require.
[01:09:59.640 --> 01:10:10.640]  But since you're just giving notice that you're not in commerce, one on the back is good enough because that's the one I used when the DPS stopped me.
[01:10:10.640 --> 01:10:15.640]  I said, did you notice that DOT number on the back of my truck?
[01:10:15.640 --> 01:10:16.640]  Well, no, I didn't.
[01:10:16.640 --> 01:10:21.640]  Well, you might want to go notice that and look it up.
[01:10:21.640 --> 01:10:27.640]  And they always come back with a warning every single time.
[01:10:27.640 --> 01:10:29.640]  What is the warning?
[01:10:29.640 --> 01:10:35.640]  Whatever, you were speeding, you didn't use your blinker, blah, blah, blah.
[01:10:35.640 --> 01:10:38.640]  But I'm just going to give you a warning.
[01:10:38.640 --> 01:10:42.640]  They didn't write me a ticket.
[01:10:42.640 --> 01:10:46.640]  Speeding in a school zone.
[01:10:46.640 --> 01:10:48.640]  It was a trap.
[01:10:48.640 --> 01:10:56.640]  The road was blocked and they sent you around the corner and through a church parking lot.
[01:10:56.640 --> 01:11:07.640]  You come back onto the road you were going to turn on from a church parking lot and you were past the school zone sign.
[01:11:07.640 --> 01:11:12.640]  And as soon as you got up to the regular speed, bang, they got you.
[01:11:12.640 --> 01:11:13.640]  Okay.
[01:11:13.640 --> 01:11:16.640]  Now, another question, another question.
[01:11:16.640 --> 01:11:30.640]  Ms. Debra has filed into the federal bankruptcy court with the Chief Justice of the Court as required by the bankruptcy judge that she had in her case because they had her declared a vexation of the litigants.
[01:11:30.640 --> 01:11:41.640]  She filed a motion for a declaratory judgment, not on the fraudulent document, not on that at all.
[01:11:41.640 --> 01:11:54.640]  She did it on the fact that she had a notary presentment that everybody waived their claim and she wanted an adjudication that there was nothing owed on this mortgage because they waived their claim.
[01:11:54.640 --> 01:12:06.640]  And the only person that has an interest right now in the property that was last assigned the mortgage is Countrywide Homelands Inc.
[01:12:06.640 --> 01:12:09.640]  And they don't exist.
[01:12:09.640 --> 01:12:10.640]  Yes.
[01:12:10.640 --> 01:12:17.640]  There's no executive officers to authorize the discharge or cancellation of the note.
[01:12:17.640 --> 01:12:19.640]  And it requires court action.
[01:12:19.640 --> 01:12:22.640]  Would you please give her a discharge?
[01:12:22.640 --> 01:12:26.640]  Are you familiar with Judge Shrek in New York?
[01:12:26.640 --> 01:12:28.640]  Yes, I know who he is.
[01:12:28.640 --> 01:12:30.640]  Okay.
[01:12:30.640 --> 01:12:34.640]  So he has the ruling here, the one he called the Vampire of Lenders.
[01:12:34.640 --> 01:12:37.640]  Vampire of Lenders, yes.
[01:12:37.640 --> 01:12:42.640]  They rose up from the grave and hired an agent.
[01:12:42.640 --> 01:12:43.640]  Yeah.
[01:12:43.640 --> 01:12:45.640]  We want to see how they do that.
[01:12:45.640 --> 01:12:53.640]  It would be interesting to see how they rule. I like declaratory judgments because they're clean and simple.
[01:12:53.640 --> 01:12:55.640]  Not a lot of trash.
[01:12:55.640 --> 01:13:02.640]  And one of the things I've been going after and in my traffic ticket site, I'm setting up the judges for this.
[01:13:02.640 --> 01:13:05.640]  I have a what we call a Mother Hubbard motion.
[01:13:05.640 --> 01:13:15.640]  And in that Mother Hubbard motion, we demand that the judge rule on every element in every pleading.
[01:13:15.640 --> 01:13:20.640]  We construe a failure to do so is a denial of a due process.
[01:13:20.640 --> 01:13:35.640]  So when the judge dismisses the ruling, the defense is the motion without making a stated ruling on each element we charge incriminately.
[01:13:35.640 --> 01:13:39.640]  They've been saying, well, if you don't like my ruling, you can appeal.
[01:13:39.640 --> 01:13:42.640]  Well, you go before a corrupt judge.
[01:13:42.640 --> 01:13:44.640]  He renders a bogus ruling.
[01:13:44.640 --> 01:13:45.640]  They said, that's okay.
[01:13:45.640 --> 01:13:47.640]  You can go before a whole panel of corrupt judges.
[01:13:47.640 --> 01:13:50.640]  They really screw your royal.
[01:13:50.640 --> 01:13:54.640]  I've got a better idea. Let's appeal to a grand jury.
[01:13:54.640 --> 01:14:06.640]  Because we have Jocelyn V Chambers that says, it is an abusive discretion for a judge to fail to properly.
[01:14:06.640 --> 01:14:07.640]  I'm sorry.
[01:14:07.640 --> 01:14:15.640]  It says a judge has no discretion in properly applying the law to the facts of failure to do so.
[01:14:15.640 --> 01:14:17.640]  It's a denial.
[01:14:17.640 --> 01:14:23.640]  It's a abuse of discretion.
[01:14:23.640 --> 01:14:28.640]  An abusive discretion that denies you in the form of free access to your judgment.
[01:14:28.640 --> 01:14:32.640]  I read that as official oppression.
[01:14:32.640 --> 01:14:33.640]  File against it.
[01:14:33.640 --> 01:14:36.640]  We've done that here in Texas.
[01:14:36.640 --> 01:14:39.640]  We file criminally against the judge when he failed.
[01:14:39.640 --> 01:14:45.640]  In the technical issue, we asked him to provide findings, effect, and conclusions at law.
[01:14:45.640 --> 01:14:51.640]  The rule said the judge shall provide findings, effect, and conclusions at law within 20 days.
[01:14:51.640 --> 01:14:54.640]  On the 21st day, we filed.
[01:14:54.640 --> 01:14:56.640]  See how that works out for him.
[01:14:56.640 --> 01:14:57.640]  And now we've got more.
[01:14:57.640 --> 01:15:00.640]  We'll be filing against him as well.
[01:15:00.640 --> 01:15:09.640]  And then while the judge is trying to screw these people in the court, we're trying to get the judge indicted by a grand jury.
[01:15:09.640 --> 01:15:14.640]  And that's something he has no control over.
[01:15:14.640 --> 01:15:18.640]  So we see how this works for you, judge.
[01:15:18.640 --> 01:15:24.640]  You might try that on these guys because this is something they can't do anything about.
[01:15:24.640 --> 01:15:27.640]  You start.
[01:15:27.640 --> 01:15:30.640]  Let me explain Pennsylvania.
[01:15:30.640 --> 01:15:32.640]  Pennsylvania is unique.
[01:15:32.640 --> 01:15:36.640]  You don't have access to a grand jury.
[01:15:36.640 --> 01:15:38.640]  However, you have standing.
[01:15:38.640 --> 01:15:39.640]  It makes up for it.
[01:15:39.640 --> 01:15:43.640]  So in Pennsylvania, you file your complaint with the district attorney.
[01:15:43.640 --> 01:15:56.640]  And the district attorney has first plush discretion to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence to believe that a crime has been committed and that the accused committed the crime.
[01:15:56.640 --> 01:16:00.640]  What he does not have is judicial caprice.
[01:16:00.640 --> 01:16:05.640]  He does not have the right to decide who he wants to prosecute and who he does not.
[01:16:05.640 --> 01:16:14.640]  So when he fails to prosecute, you file a appeal with the court of common please because you have standing.
[01:16:14.640 --> 01:16:25.640]  And when the court of common please refuses to act on your appeal, then you when I'm sorry, when the prosecutor refuses to act, you file an appeal with the court common please.
[01:16:25.640 --> 01:16:31.640]  You also file a criminal complaint against him with the state attorney general.
[01:16:31.640 --> 01:16:35.640]  In the state attorney general, the state of Pennsylvania has prosecutorial power.
[01:16:35.640 --> 01:16:49.640]  And when the state attorney general exercises prosecutorial caprice, then you appeal his ruling to the court of common please and file a criminal charge with the court of common please against him.
[01:16:49.640 --> 01:16:52.640]  I just crank it up all the way to the state supreme.
[01:16:52.640 --> 01:16:59.640]  Well, the end game here on our end here is for Pennsylvania House.
[01:16:59.640 --> 01:17:11.640]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works.
[01:17:11.640 --> 01:17:15.640]  Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win.
[01:17:15.640 --> 01:17:18.640]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:18.640 --> 01:17:24.640]  From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[01:17:24.640 --> 01:17:27.640]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced.
[01:17:27.640 --> 01:17:33.640]  When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101, you get four chances to win.
[01:17:33.640 --> 01:17:37.640]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get 10 chances to win.
[01:17:37.640 --> 01:17:42.640]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[01:17:42.640 --> 01:17:51.640]  If you've enjoyed the shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality programming on talk radio today.
[01:17:51.640 --> 01:17:54.640]  We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:54.640 --> 01:17:59.640]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:17:59.640 --> 01:18:00.640]  I love Logos.
[01:18:00.640 --> 01:18:04.640]  Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:04.640 --> 01:18:07.640]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back.
[01:18:07.640 --> 01:18:08.640]  I need my truth fix.
[01:18:08.640 --> 01:18:10.640]  I'd be lost without Logos.
[01:18:10.640 --> 01:18:13.640]  And I really want to help keep this network on the air.
[01:18:13.640 --> 01:18:16.640]  I'd love to volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite.
[01:18:16.640 --> 01:18:20.640]  And I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements.
[01:18:20.640 --> 01:18:22.640]  How can I help Logos?
[01:18:22.640 --> 01:18:24.640]  Well, I'm glad you asked.
[01:18:24.640 --> 01:18:29.640]  Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:18:29.640 --> 01:18:31.640]  First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:18:31.640 --> 01:18:34.640]  Now, go to logosradionetwork.com.
[01:18:34.640 --> 01:18:37.640]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it.
[01:18:37.640 --> 01:18:43.640]  Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:18:43.640 --> 01:18:44.640]  Do I pay extra?
[01:18:44.640 --> 01:18:45.640]  No.
[01:18:45.640 --> 01:18:47.640]  Do I have to do anything different when I order?
[01:18:47.640 --> 01:18:48.640]  No.
[01:18:48.640 --> 01:18:49.640]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:18:49.640 --> 01:18:50.640]  No.
[01:18:50.640 --> 01:18:51.640]  I mean, yes.
[01:18:51.640 --> 01:18:52.640]  Wow.
[01:18:52.640 --> 01:18:54.640]  Giving without doing anything or spending any money.
[01:18:54.640 --> 01:18:55.640]  This is perfect.
[01:18:55.640 --> 01:18:56.640]  Thank you so much.
[01:18:56.640 --> 01:18:58.640]  We are Logos.
[01:18:58.640 --> 01:19:00.640]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:19:00.640 --> 01:19:07.640]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:07.640 --> 01:19:09.640]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:09.640 --> 01:19:11.640]  Randy Kelton.
[01:19:11.640 --> 01:19:13.640]  No, Debra's not hearing that.
[01:19:13.640 --> 01:19:38.640]  Debra's not hearing that.
[01:19:38.640 --> 01:19:45.640]  This is the third 2018, and we're talking to Leslie and Yuma.
[01:19:45.640 --> 01:19:46.640]  Okay, Leslie.
[01:19:46.640 --> 01:19:47.640]  Hi.
[01:19:47.640 --> 01:19:48.640]  Okay.
[01:19:48.640 --> 01:19:54.640]  The end game for the house in Pennsylvania is now that it's been transferred over to the
[01:19:54.640 --> 01:20:04.640]  second mortgage holder, and as soon as they get their motion approved to dismiss the foreclosure
[01:20:04.640 --> 01:20:12.640]  action because they had no jurisdiction, as soon as we get that, we will dragonate it down.
[01:20:12.640 --> 01:20:16.640]  Okay, explain dragonating motion again.
[01:20:16.640 --> 01:20:20.640]  I like motion for cool names.
[01:20:20.640 --> 01:20:21.640]  Well, this is not a motion.
[01:20:21.640 --> 01:20:23.640]  This is an action by itself.
[01:20:23.640 --> 01:20:26.640]  A dragonating action is a lawsuit.
[01:20:26.640 --> 01:20:28.640]  Trouble damages.
[01:20:28.640 --> 01:20:29.640]  Okay.
[01:20:29.640 --> 01:20:39.640]  And what it is, is if somebody files a lawsuit against you for a purpose other than doing
[01:20:39.640 --> 01:20:44.640]  what the face value of the lawsuit says, like foreclosure, if they wanted to do more than
[01:20:44.640 --> 01:20:52.640]  foreclosure and you could prove that, and they had no reason and they had no case.
[01:20:52.640 --> 01:20:57.640]  It means if you won in the end, like I said, we've been saying they have to dismiss this
[01:20:57.640 --> 01:21:00.640]  because they don't have everybody involved.
[01:21:00.640 --> 01:21:02.640]  There's no jurisdiction.
[01:21:02.640 --> 01:21:09.640]  And if the case gets dismissed, then that gives me a dragonating because they filed it
[01:21:09.640 --> 01:21:13.640]  because they knew, number one, that the mortgage was rescinded.
[01:21:13.640 --> 01:21:20.640]  They knew they had a fraudulent assignment that was not signed.
[01:21:20.640 --> 01:21:25.640]  The assignee said, in writing, they had nothing whatsoever to do with that assignment.
[01:21:25.640 --> 01:21:28.640]  They put it in court documents.
[01:21:28.640 --> 01:21:31.640]  And they still foreclosed on the property.
[01:21:31.640 --> 01:21:35.640]  So with all these reasons...
[01:21:35.640 --> 01:21:38.640]  That comes up collateral estoppel.
[01:21:38.640 --> 01:21:40.640]  Yes.
[01:21:40.640 --> 01:21:46.640]  So the fact that they even attempted to do a foreclosure, knowing it was rescinded,
[01:21:46.640 --> 01:21:52.640]  knowing the assignment was a forgery, you know...
[01:21:52.640 --> 01:21:56.640]  Knowing that they did not include all parties.
[01:21:56.640 --> 01:22:05.640]  If the document demonstrating the quiet title was filed in the record, they had knowledge of it.
[01:22:05.640 --> 01:22:09.640]  If not personal, they had imputed.
[01:22:09.640 --> 01:22:11.640]  Right.
[01:22:11.640 --> 01:22:18.640]  So because they did not put all of their ducks in a row and because they...
[01:22:18.640 --> 01:22:22.640]  If the case gets dismissed, that gives us a dragonating action and that's trouble damages.
[01:22:22.640 --> 01:22:31.640]  Even though we lost the house, we get trouble damages of what they were trying to collect from us.
[01:22:31.640 --> 01:22:36.640]  I bet they're not going to see that coming.
[01:22:36.640 --> 01:22:41.640]  We don't call Leslie's bad grandma for nothing.
[01:22:41.640 --> 01:22:47.640]  This other dragonating action that I wrote up that was filed last week,
[01:22:47.640 --> 01:22:53.640]  costing us $30 million for a house that's worth about $300,000.
[01:22:53.640 --> 01:22:56.640]  But they had a lot of...
[01:22:56.640 --> 01:23:02.640]  They've been going through this for 10 years with a forgery as a mortgage itself, not a forged assignment,
[01:23:02.640 --> 01:23:11.640]  but a forgery of a mortgage in the record that was notarized 400 miles away from their house.
[01:23:11.640 --> 01:23:16.640]  I mean, who goes to settlement 400 miles away from their house?
[01:23:16.640 --> 01:23:17.640]  You know?
[01:23:17.640 --> 01:23:19.640]  Yes.
[01:23:19.640 --> 01:23:22.640]  And now they're filing foreclosure against him.
[01:23:22.640 --> 01:23:28.640]  So he's going to dragonate them for the last lawsuit they did which was a quiet title against him
[01:23:28.640 --> 01:23:33.640]  and they dropped it as soon as the case in the federal court got dropped.
[01:23:33.640 --> 01:23:35.640]  They dropped it immediately.
[01:23:35.640 --> 01:23:43.640]  The whole reason they filed the quiet title in that case was because they wanted to screw up the minds of the parties involved
[01:23:43.640 --> 01:23:46.640]  because they brought in like 600 parties.
[01:23:46.640 --> 01:23:50.640]  They brought all of these title companies and everything fighting him.
[01:23:50.640 --> 01:23:54.640]  So when they did that, then he got this dragonating.
[01:23:54.640 --> 01:24:02.640]  So now, before he could even file the dragonating, they filed for foreclosure using this forgery of a mortgage.
[01:24:02.640 --> 01:24:06.640]  Trying to say that because the case was dismissed, that's not a forgery.
[01:24:06.640 --> 01:24:10.640]  That's not what the case said.
[01:24:10.640 --> 01:24:15.640]  The case never judged it to be a forgery or not a forgery.
[01:24:15.640 --> 01:24:21.640]  So the case, the court acted on it as if it were valid.
[01:24:21.640 --> 01:24:26.640]  So if you can show that it's a forgery, then any judgment by the court is void.
[01:24:26.640 --> 01:24:28.640]  It's a matter of law.
[01:24:28.640 --> 01:24:29.640]  Right.
[01:24:29.640 --> 01:24:35.640]  So now he's got a dragonating action and a foreclosure so that when he wins the foreclosure case,
[01:24:35.640 --> 01:24:37.640]  he's got another dragonating action.
[01:24:37.640 --> 01:24:40.640]  And the other dragonating action, the first one is starting late.
[01:24:40.640 --> 01:24:44.640]  Can you imagine what the second one's going to be?
[01:24:44.640 --> 01:24:49.640]  These lawyers must really believe they've got all the courts bought and paid for.
[01:24:49.640 --> 01:24:50.640]  Yes.
[01:24:50.640 --> 01:24:53.640]  Because they're acting so outrageous.
[01:24:53.640 --> 01:25:05.640]  And I am really getting excited about getting my tools in place so that we can take your knowledge
[01:25:05.640 --> 01:25:12.640]  and capture it into a tool to where we'll have almost every person who's being foreclosed
[01:25:12.640 --> 01:25:19.640]  on in Pennsylvania or who has been foreclosed on fighting dragonating actions.
[01:25:19.640 --> 01:25:24.640]  What is the statute of limitations on a dragonating action?
[01:25:24.640 --> 01:25:32.640]  The dragonating action requires that you win your case either by dismissal or by judgment.
[01:25:32.640 --> 01:25:36.640]  It's a requirement.
[01:25:36.640 --> 01:25:37.640]  Oh, okay.
[01:25:37.640 --> 01:25:40.640]  So where they've lost, they...
[01:25:40.640 --> 01:25:46.640]  We'll prepare others where we go to subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:25:46.640 --> 01:25:48.640]  Right.
[01:25:48.640 --> 01:25:57.640]  And the problem with subject matter jurisdiction challenge is it gets past an immediate dismissal.
[01:25:57.640 --> 01:26:04.640]  They can't go in based on statute limitations because on subject matter jurisdiction, there
[01:26:04.640 --> 01:26:07.640]  are no limitations.
[01:26:07.640 --> 01:26:08.640]  Right.
[01:26:08.640 --> 01:26:13.640]  So if we can ever get the courts ruling in our favor, then we can take all these people
[01:26:13.640 --> 01:26:18.640]  who have screwed in the past and bring them back and start dumping them on the courts.
[01:26:18.640 --> 01:26:19.640]  Yes.
[01:26:19.640 --> 01:26:21.640]  Now, I have a question for you.
[01:26:21.640 --> 01:26:28.640]  In the beginning when we were talking about the state action for the fraudulent mean on
[01:26:28.640 --> 01:26:34.640]  property under the 51, you said that Deborah had a sorry judgment she could get.
[01:26:34.640 --> 01:26:37.640]  Are you meaning a default judgment?
[01:26:37.640 --> 01:26:39.640]  Yes, default judgment.
[01:26:39.640 --> 01:26:41.640]  Default judgment is a summary judgment.
[01:26:41.640 --> 01:26:42.640]  It's just the style of it.
[01:26:42.640 --> 01:26:44.640]  Yes, default judgment.
[01:26:44.640 --> 01:26:45.640]  Okay.
[01:26:45.640 --> 01:26:51.640]  Because this judge that she has has told her to her face that she don't care if they come
[01:26:51.640 --> 01:26:53.640]  back after 10 years.
[01:26:53.640 --> 01:26:56.640]  He'll reopen the case and reorder it.
[01:26:56.640 --> 01:27:02.640]  He should have asked the bailiff to arrest him right there.
[01:27:02.640 --> 01:27:07.640]  The judge told me something like that and I will ask the bailiff to arrest him right
[01:27:07.640 --> 01:27:08.640]  there.
[01:27:08.640 --> 01:27:12.640]  Do you want to play hardball with me, bad boy?
[01:27:12.640 --> 01:27:16.640]  I'll introduce you to the deep end of the pool.
[01:27:16.640 --> 01:27:22.640]  Actually, what he was saying is in no one's certain terms that default judgment is never
[01:27:22.640 --> 01:27:24.640]  final.
[01:27:24.640 --> 01:27:30.640]  The default judgment is collateral estoppel until another court rules that it's something
[01:27:30.640 --> 01:27:31.640]  else.
[01:27:31.640 --> 01:27:33.640]  And yes, it is final.
[01:27:33.640 --> 01:27:36.640]  I don't know where you got that nonsense from.
[01:27:36.640 --> 01:27:44.640]  30 days after the ruling, the court loses plenary jurisdiction and it is unassailable.
[01:27:44.640 --> 01:27:47.640]  It can't be touched.
[01:27:47.640 --> 01:27:49.640]  The judge is making that up.
[01:27:49.640 --> 01:27:51.640]  That's a lie.
[01:27:51.640 --> 01:27:52.640]  Okay.
[01:27:52.640 --> 01:27:57.640]  So she's got to get the default judgment first and then hang around and let them just sit
[01:27:57.640 --> 01:27:58.640]  there.
[01:27:58.640 --> 01:27:59.640]  Okay.
[01:27:59.640 --> 01:28:03.640]  If the judge has said that to her, she needs to move to disqualify the judge for clause.
[01:28:03.640 --> 01:28:07.640]  And is it a state judge, is this in the state?
[01:28:07.640 --> 01:28:08.640]  Yes.
[01:28:08.640 --> 01:28:09.640]  Okay.
[01:28:09.640 --> 01:28:12.640]  File criminal charges against the judge.
[01:28:12.640 --> 01:28:13.640]  Okay.
[01:28:13.640 --> 01:28:21.640]  He's blatantly indicated that he doesn't understand, doesn't know the law and he's going to rule
[01:28:21.640 --> 01:28:22.640]  against her.
[01:28:22.640 --> 01:28:28.640]  So let him explain that to a grand jury of your peers.
[01:28:28.640 --> 01:28:31.640]  So you want to have yourself an attitude.
[01:28:31.640 --> 01:28:36.640]  The one thing that I've gotten really short tempered on is judges with attitude.
[01:28:36.640 --> 01:28:37.640]  Okay.
[01:28:37.640 --> 01:28:42.640]  If you want to have an attitude, you better keep it to yourself.
[01:28:42.640 --> 01:28:47.640]  Now, that'll take care of that judge there.
[01:28:47.640 --> 01:28:52.640]  Now, the one in the bankruptcy court, how long does he have to sit on that?
[01:28:52.640 --> 01:28:55.640]  There is no rule.
[01:28:55.640 --> 01:29:03.380]  Essentially, he can sit on this as long as he wants to, unless you go to the court of
[01:29:03.380 --> 01:29:10.880]  appeals with the petition for rid of mandamus, asking them to order him to rule.
[01:29:10.880 --> 01:29:16.240]  And most of them are not picked up, but just filing a mandamus, you know.
[01:29:16.240 --> 01:29:24.520]  What they told me when I filed is that only 12% get accepted and only 2% get ruled in
[01:29:24.520 --> 01:29:26.680]  the finalist favor.
[01:29:26.680 --> 01:29:33.040]  What they didn't say is when you file a mandamus, most of the time the judge will fix the problem
[01:29:33.040 --> 01:29:37.160]  because they don't want the court of appeals laying it on them like a ton of bricks.
[01:29:37.160 --> 01:29:38.480]  So it just goes away.
[01:29:38.480 --> 01:29:39.880]  So the court doesn't have to do anything.
[01:29:39.880 --> 01:29:43.800]  So that skews the numbers.
[01:29:43.800 --> 01:29:50.760]  Mandamus and Art instance, and Tim is on the line, he'll tell you he had an incredible
[01:29:50.760 --> 01:29:51.760]  impact.
[01:29:51.760 --> 01:29:59.240]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, we'll allow radio, we'll be right back.
[01:29:59.240 --> 01:30:06.880]  Once upon a time, your printer was not a privacy risk, but today's printers are often connected
[01:30:06.880 --> 01:30:10.280]  to Wi-Fi networks, making them a treasure trove for hackers.
[01:30:10.280 --> 01:30:17.200]  Under your cavern Albrecht, back with details on the potential spy in your office, next.
[01:30:17.200 --> 01:30:18.920]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.920 --> 01:30:22.520]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:22.520 --> 01:30:27.520]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:27.520 --> 01:30:32.640]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.640 --> 01:30:35.280]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.280 --> 01:30:40.880]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google,
[01:30:40.880 --> 01:30:42.640]  Yahoo and Bing.
[01:30:42.640 --> 01:30:46.480]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:46.480 --> 01:30:50.440]  Hacking somebody through their printer sounds like an urban legend, but now that printers
[01:30:50.440 --> 01:30:55.320]  have hard drives, email capacity and are connected to the Internet, they've become attractive
[01:30:55.320 --> 01:30:56.320]  to attackers.
[01:30:56.320 --> 01:30:57.960]  Here's an example.
[01:30:57.960 --> 01:31:03.560]  Samsung printers sold up until October 2012 had a security flaw that lets hackers send
[01:31:03.560 --> 01:31:09.640]  fake faxes, copy sensitive documents and spy on you or your company by eavesdropping on
[01:31:09.640 --> 01:31:12.440]  your Wi-Fi traffic, yikes.
[01:31:12.440 --> 01:31:17.520]  Your best defense is to change the default password, add antivirus and malware protection
[01:31:17.520 --> 01:31:20.360]  and get that printer behind a firewall.
[01:31:20.360 --> 01:31:22.560]  If you don't, you could be the next victim.
[01:31:22.560 --> 01:31:31.200]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.200 --> 01:31:36.600]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.600 --> 01:31:38.840]  The government says that FIRE brought it down.
[01:31:38.840 --> 01:31:43.600]  But 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.600 --> 01:31:47.640]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, and 1,000 of my fellow
[01:31:47.640 --> 01:31:49.080]  force responders have died.
[01:31:49.080 --> 01:31:52.920]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a structural engineer, I'm a New York City correction office,
[01:31:52.920 --> 01:31:57.560]  I'm an Air Force pilot, I'm the father who lost his son, we're Americans and we deserve
[01:31:57.560 --> 01:31:58.560]  the truth.
[01:31:58.560 --> 01:32:00.920]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:00.920 --> 01:32:03.760]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:03.760 --> 01:32:06.760]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:06.760 --> 01:32:10.440]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting
[01:32:10.440 --> 01:32:11.440]  them to pay for it.
[01:32:11.440 --> 01:32:15.040]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.040 --> 01:32:18.840]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for
[01:32:18.840 --> 01:32:24.080]  you with little to no out-of-pocket expense, and we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus
[01:32:24.080 --> 01:32:27.200]  member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.200 --> 01:32:31.560]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the
[01:32:31.560 --> 01:32:32.640]  first time.
[01:32:32.640 --> 01:32:41.760]  You can call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com, mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate
[01:32:41.760 --> 01:32:45.920]  another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.920 --> 01:32:51.040]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:51.040 --> 01:32:57.120]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.120 --> 01:32:59.040]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.040 --> 01:33:03.440]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:03.440 --> 01:33:05.160]  Looking for some truth?
[01:33:05.160 --> 01:33:32.000]  We found it at LogosRadioNetwork.com Okay, we are back.
[01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:36.000]  Randy Kelton, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Leslie in Pennsylvania.
[01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:37.000]  Okay, Leslie.
[01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  Yeah.
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:39.000]  Okay.
[01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:46.600]  So, well, anyway, that's what I was just concerned with is how long she had to wait
[01:33:46.600 --> 01:33:55.240]  before she did anything with the court in Tyler with the Chief Justice, because he is
[01:33:55.240 --> 01:33:58.240]  the Chief Justice of the bankruptcy court.
[01:33:58.240 --> 01:34:07.400]  Okay, there's not much you can do with him, other than petition for Ritter-Mandamus, and
[01:34:07.400 --> 01:34:10.640]  what Ritter-Mandamus will do is just kind of embarrass him.
[01:34:10.640 --> 01:34:17.880]  You know, he's sitting on it, he's not taking care of his docket, he's not getting his job
[01:34:17.880 --> 01:34:24.440]  done, and you sting him with the court of appeals, he's not going to be happy about
[01:34:24.440 --> 01:34:25.440]  that.
[01:34:25.440 --> 01:34:34.400]  No, wait, this is federal, so even better, is stinking with federal court of appeals.
[01:34:34.400 --> 01:34:37.640]  I told her we should wait for eight weeks, and that should give him plenty of time, and
[01:34:37.640 --> 01:34:40.800]  show that we were patient, and then hitting with it.
[01:34:40.800 --> 01:34:41.800]  Exactly, exactly.
[01:34:41.800 --> 01:34:49.440]  This is important to you, and he is holding up her ability to move forward in her issues,
[01:34:49.440 --> 01:34:52.960]  so she doesn't need to be terribly patient.
[01:34:52.960 --> 01:34:53.960]  Yeah.
[01:34:53.960 --> 01:35:00.720]  She's not a lawyer, so she don't care, he's not going to be able to screw her next client
[01:35:00.720 --> 01:35:03.320]  to get back at her.
[01:35:03.320 --> 01:35:11.720]  So you'll put a mark on his chart, if this judge wants to ascend to the court of appeals
[01:35:11.720 --> 01:35:18.400]  with something like this, it's really going to sting him big time.
[01:35:18.400 --> 01:35:19.400]  Right.
[01:35:19.400 --> 01:35:26.920]  Well, we figured we'd put those two issues, the one with the notary presentment and the
[01:35:26.920 --> 01:35:34.040]  dead assignee of the mortgage, that we'd put that in front of the bankruptcy court, and
[01:35:34.040 --> 01:35:39.960]  we'd put the fraudulent one in front of the district court, and whichever one works for
[01:35:39.960 --> 01:35:42.320]  us, works for us.
[01:35:42.320 --> 01:35:43.320]  You know?
[01:35:43.320 --> 01:35:44.320]  Exactly.
[01:35:44.320 --> 01:35:49.920]  Okay, you've been a stranger lately.
[01:35:49.920 --> 01:35:53.600]  Well, I've been working on a lot of appeals.
[01:35:53.600 --> 01:36:00.920]  I mean, Ms. Deborah had two appeals from the bankruptcy court, and one of them is in the
[01:36:00.920 --> 01:36:08.600]  Fifth Circuit already, that we just prepared today that she's sending out on Monday.
[01:36:08.600 --> 01:36:16.200]  That would, because she had two separate appeals, and one got dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
[01:36:16.200 --> 01:36:22.560]  because she, the mail, remember the mailbox rule that she went and had a problem with?
[01:36:22.560 --> 01:36:25.840]  So that was in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
[01:36:25.840 --> 01:36:30.920]  And I told her, I said, you know, I said, no matter what happens with your property,
[01:36:30.920 --> 01:36:34.760]  that you win your cases and everything on this other stuff we're doing, I still want
[01:36:34.760 --> 01:36:40.120]  you to go through with this appeal because it means something to other people.
[01:36:40.120 --> 01:36:44.400]  Other people have to put up with this nonsense with the mailbox rule.
[01:36:44.400 --> 01:36:49.360]  Yes, that sounds like a deliberate breach of the mailbox rule.
[01:36:49.360 --> 01:36:50.360]  Yeah.
[01:36:50.360 --> 01:36:58.080]  And, well, and when you read the rules, it's in the rules that the mailbox rule does not
[01:36:58.080 --> 01:37:00.320]  apply to the notice of appeal.
[01:37:00.320 --> 01:37:05.440]  It has to be received by the clerk of the court.
[01:37:05.440 --> 01:37:09.960]  Wouldn't you say that again?
[01:37:09.960 --> 01:37:15.920]  It's in the rules of civil procedure and the rules of bankruptcy procedure that the notice
[01:37:15.920 --> 01:37:22.400]  of appeal must be in the hands of the clerk of the court by the due date.
[01:37:22.400 --> 01:37:24.360]  It does not matter when you mail them.
[01:37:24.360 --> 01:37:26.640]  You've heard that before.
[01:37:26.640 --> 01:37:30.520]  Is Deborah signed up for e-filing?
[01:37:30.520 --> 01:37:31.520]  No.
[01:37:31.520 --> 01:37:34.240]  So, have her sign up.
[01:37:34.240 --> 01:37:35.240]  Everybody can sign up.
[01:37:35.240 --> 01:37:36.240]  Anybody can.
[01:37:36.240 --> 01:37:37.240]  It's really easy.
[01:37:37.240 --> 01:37:39.480]  It takes no time at all.
[01:37:39.480 --> 01:37:44.560]  And then it ends the problem with giving notice to the other side.
[01:37:44.560 --> 01:37:46.240]  You just e-file it.
[01:37:46.240 --> 01:37:51.560]  The clerk e-files it, it gives e-mail notice to the other side.
[01:37:51.560 --> 01:37:53.640]  All that stuff is done with.
[01:37:53.640 --> 01:37:56.720]  Well, that would be wonderful.
[01:37:56.720 --> 01:38:01.440]  Yeah, as soon as you can go on three o'clock in the morning and e-file it, and it's a done
[01:38:01.440 --> 01:38:03.040]  deal right then.
[01:38:03.040 --> 01:38:05.040]  The court has it.
[01:38:05.040 --> 01:38:06.040]  Right.
[01:38:06.040 --> 01:38:07.040]  Okay.
[01:38:07.040 --> 01:38:17.640]  So, anybody out there who's in a court other than a municipal or JP, go online, sign up
[01:38:17.640 --> 01:38:21.400]  for e-filing, then you can e-file all your documents.
[01:38:21.400 --> 01:38:26.760]  There are some caveats in how you have to prepare them.
[01:38:26.760 --> 01:38:31.800]  But if anybody has any problems, they'll call me and I'll explain how to do it.
[01:38:31.800 --> 01:38:42.080]  You want to create the motions or pleading the documents in a Microsoft Word product.
[01:38:42.080 --> 01:38:49.600]  You want to go online and locate a add-on for Microsoft Word.
[01:38:49.600 --> 01:38:55.560]  There are free ones out there that will allow Microsoft Word to save your document as a
[01:38:55.560 --> 01:38:58.560]  PDF.
[01:38:58.560 --> 01:39:03.320]  Then you put headings in your document.
[01:39:03.320 --> 01:39:10.800]  I suggest you put a heading, use the style sheet in Microsoft Word to put headings on
[01:39:10.800 --> 01:39:11.800]  your documents.
[01:39:11.800 --> 01:39:17.720]  And when you put headings on your document, you can go to view navigation pane and it
[01:39:17.720 --> 01:39:23.240]  will open up a box next to your page that is a table of contents.
[01:39:23.240 --> 01:39:30.000]  And you can tell Word to create a table of contents and it will use these headings to
[01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:32.360]  create a table of contents.
[01:39:32.360 --> 01:39:39.960]  Then you save the document with a table of contents as a PDF and it gives you what they
[01:39:39.960 --> 01:39:45.440]  call a searchable PDF and that's what e-file calls for.
[01:39:45.440 --> 01:39:52.720]  Oh, it's not hard to do and you put your signature in, you put a slash, a tilde and
[01:39:52.720 --> 01:40:02.480]  s in front of your signature, s tilde a slash behind your signature.
[01:40:02.480 --> 01:40:07.560]  That's about it to e-filing but if it's not done that way, they won't accept it.
[01:40:07.560 --> 01:40:12.680]  So there's just a little bit of caveat on how to build it but once you've done it a
[01:40:12.680 --> 01:40:18.800]  lot of time or two and the clerks are real good about telling you how to do this especially
[01:40:18.800 --> 01:40:23.920]  in the federal court but they'll work with you because e-filing is new and I guess they
[01:40:23.920 --> 01:40:27.200]  have to work even with attorneys to get it right.
[01:40:27.200 --> 01:40:32.960]  But once you've got the pattern down, it's pretty simple and then you just, you know,
[01:40:32.960 --> 01:40:39.120]  with Tim and that, we just made up a couple of documents and see e-files and boom, they're
[01:40:39.120 --> 01:40:40.120]  done.
[01:40:40.120 --> 01:40:46.400]  There's no question about who got what when because when the e-files, you have to do this
[01:40:46.400 --> 01:40:50.800]  through an e-file company and when the e-file company sends it to them, there's no questions.
[01:40:50.800 --> 01:40:52.680]  It's done.
[01:40:52.680 --> 01:40:58.760]  You don't notice the other side the clerk does.
[01:40:58.760 --> 01:41:03.240]  You may have emailed her, she emails to them or her or him.
[01:41:03.240 --> 01:41:08.360]  The problem we have in Pennsylvania is if you e-file and for some reason the filing
[01:41:08.360 --> 01:41:18.360]  fails, you don't know and that's what screwed up my appeal with e-filing.
[01:41:18.360 --> 01:41:25.840]  Well, what Laura does is she e-files and then calls the clerk but yeah in taxes if it fails
[01:41:25.840 --> 01:41:33.640]  it bumps back to you and you know that should be an issue brought up in Pennsylvania because
[01:41:33.640 --> 01:41:39.720]  if they make a decision not to accept your filing, then and not don't notice you that
[01:41:39.720 --> 01:41:43.640]  they made a negative decision and that's the due process this year.
[01:41:43.640 --> 01:41:44.640]  Yeah.
[01:41:44.640 --> 01:41:49.080]  Yeah, because I was wondering why it wasn't in the docket I could tell him.
[01:41:49.080 --> 01:41:50.080]  He said, no, I filed it.
[01:41:50.080 --> 01:41:51.080]  I filed it.
[01:41:51.080 --> 01:41:52.080]  It was not in the docket.
[01:41:52.080 --> 01:41:55.080]  I thought I called a speciality and I said, why isn't this in the docket?
[01:41:55.080 --> 01:41:59.640]  She said, oh, that failed and they tried to file it but it failed.
[01:41:59.640 --> 01:42:01.640]  I said, what do you mean it failed?
[01:42:01.640 --> 01:42:08.800]  You know and you know I went round and round with a personitary about it and then as you
[01:42:08.800 --> 01:42:13.520]  can see even Supreme Court won't hear it.
[01:42:13.520 --> 01:42:18.720]  So did you sue the personitary directly?
[01:42:18.720 --> 01:42:19.720]  Not yet.
[01:42:19.720 --> 01:42:20.720]  Not yet.
[01:42:20.720 --> 01:42:22.720]  For denying you due process.
[01:42:22.720 --> 01:42:23.720]  Right?
[01:42:23.720 --> 01:42:24.720]  Right?
[01:42:24.720 --> 01:42:27.880]  Now I can sue him because you know.
[01:42:27.880 --> 01:42:29.320]  Yes, sue him directly.
[01:42:29.320 --> 01:42:31.440]  See how he likes that.
[01:42:31.440 --> 01:42:35.160]  You might want to put a provision in there that will email the document back and tell
[01:42:35.160 --> 01:42:40.480]  him because otherwise you're making a decision with your software that affects someone's
[01:42:40.480 --> 01:42:43.280]  rights and you're not giving notice.
[01:42:43.280 --> 01:42:44.280]  Yeah.
[01:42:44.280 --> 01:42:49.000]  So you're denying them their access to the court.
[01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:51.720]  These are growing pains with e-fighting.
[01:42:51.720 --> 01:42:52.720]  Yeah.
[01:42:52.720 --> 01:42:55.240]  So you have to be careful with them.
[01:42:55.240 --> 01:42:57.240]  Is what I'm saying, is it?
[01:42:57.240 --> 01:42:58.240]  Yes.
[01:42:58.240 --> 01:42:59.240]  Some will take everything.
[01:42:59.240 --> 01:43:05.360]  Well in taxes if it fails it bumps right back to you so you know immediately.
[01:43:05.360 --> 01:43:06.360]  Yeah.
[01:43:06.360 --> 01:43:13.880]  Well all he got was a receipt but the receipt said no in the bottom and what does that mean?
[01:43:13.880 --> 01:43:18.800]  You know I mean it wasn't that you would notice right away that it failed.
[01:43:18.800 --> 01:43:21.960]  No big blisters, no bumping back, nothing like that.
[01:43:21.960 --> 01:43:26.080]  Yeah, nothing telling you what no meant so that won't be helpful.
[01:43:26.080 --> 01:43:28.680]  Okay, we're about to go to break and we do have some more callers.
[01:43:28.680 --> 01:43:30.560]  Do you have anything else for us Leslie?
[01:43:30.560 --> 01:43:34.000]  No, I really appreciate the time you spent today.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  Thank you very much.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:39.280]  Okay, thank you Leslie and don't be a stranger.
[01:43:39.280 --> 01:43:42.320]  Okay, we're about to go to break and we'll come back.
[01:43:42.320 --> 01:43:48.480]  We're going to go to Tim in Texas, this is Randy Kelton, we're on our radio, our call
[01:43:48.480 --> 01:44:00.280]  in number 512-646-1984, we'll be right back.
[01:44:00.280 --> 01:44:06.080]  Nutritious food is real body armor, it builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion and
[01:44:06.080 --> 01:44:08.680]  feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:44:08.680 --> 01:44:12.960]  Did you know the US government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:44:12.960 --> 01:44:17.520]  and classified it as a schedule one drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:44:17.520 --> 01:44:21.680]  People have been confused about this plan for over 80 years and many still don't know
[01:44:21.680 --> 01:44:22.680]  what hemp is.
[01:44:22.680 --> 01:44:28.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp, they are different
[01:44:28.000 --> 01:44:30.080]  varieties of the same species.
[01:44:30.080 --> 01:44:34.840]  Hempusa.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand
[01:44:34.840 --> 01:44:39.400]  that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:44:39.400 --> 01:44:45.520]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten free, anti-inflammatory,
[01:44:45.520 --> 01:44:54.480]  non-GMO and is loaded with nutrients, call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367 and see what our
[01:44:54.480 --> 01:44:59.800]  powder seeds and oil can do for you only at hempusa.org.
[01:44:59.800 --> 01:45:04.800]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.800 --> 01:45:08.200]  Win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary.
[01:45:08.200 --> 01:45:15.680]  Be affordable, easy to understand, 4 CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by
[01:45:15.680 --> 01:45:16.680]  step.
[01:45:16.680 --> 01:45:19.560]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.560 --> 01:45:23.640]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.640 --> 01:45:29.440]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too.
[01:45:29.440 --> 01:45:35.160]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:35.160 --> 01:45:39.840]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about
[01:45:39.840 --> 01:45:44.200]  the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.200 --> 01:45:50.280]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:50.280 --> 01:45:52.880]  pro se tactics and much more.
[01:45:52.880 --> 01:46:22.720]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.720 --> 01:46:29.440]  Okay, we are back, we're at DeKelton, rule of law radio and we're going to Tim in Texas.
[01:46:29.440 --> 01:46:30.440]  Hello Tim.
[01:46:30.440 --> 01:46:33.440]  Hello sir.
[01:46:33.440 --> 01:46:35.440]  What do you have for us today?
[01:46:35.440 --> 01:46:38.440]  I'll just ask some questions.
[01:46:38.440 --> 01:46:43.440]  Wait a minute, you sound horrible.
[01:46:43.440 --> 01:46:44.440]  Huh?
[01:46:44.440 --> 01:46:48.960]  Are you on a Bluetooth or a hands-free?
[01:46:48.960 --> 01:46:52.560]  Yeah, hang on, I'm trying to get this thing to.
[01:46:52.560 --> 01:46:53.560]  Not good.
[01:46:53.560 --> 01:46:54.560]  How's that?
[01:46:54.560 --> 01:46:55.560]  Speak.
[01:46:55.560 --> 01:46:56.560]  Give me a mic check.
[01:46:56.560 --> 01:46:57.560]  Huh?
[01:46:57.560 --> 01:46:58.560]  Talk to me.
[01:46:58.560 --> 01:46:59.560]  Did you hear me now?
[01:46:59.560 --> 01:47:00.560]  Okay, a little bit.
[01:47:00.560 --> 01:47:01.560]  Go ahead, let's see if this works.
[01:47:01.560 --> 01:47:02.560]  Now I can't hear you at all.
[01:47:02.560 --> 01:47:03.560]  Okay.
[01:47:03.560 --> 01:47:04.560]  Okay.
[01:47:04.560 --> 01:47:05.560]  Okay.
[01:47:05.560 --> 01:47:06.560]  Okay.
[01:47:06.560 --> 01:47:07.560]  Okay.
[01:47:07.560 --> 01:47:08.560]  Okay.
[01:47:08.560 --> 01:47:09.560]  Okay.
[01:47:09.560 --> 01:47:10.560]  Okay.
[01:47:10.560 --> 01:47:11.560]  Okay.
[01:47:11.560 --> 01:47:12.560]  Okay.
[01:47:12.560 --> 01:47:13.560]  Okay.
[01:47:13.560 --> 01:47:14.560]  Okay.
[01:47:14.560 --> 01:47:15.560]  Okay.
[01:47:15.560 --> 01:47:16.560]  Okay.
[01:47:16.560 --> 01:47:17.560]  Okay.
[01:47:17.560 --> 01:47:18.560]  Okay.
[01:47:18.560 --> 01:47:19.560]  Okay.
[01:47:19.560 --> 01:47:20.560]  Okay.
[01:47:20.560 --> 01:47:21.560]  Okay.
[01:47:21.560 --> 01:47:22.560]  Okay, Tim.
[01:47:22.560 --> 01:47:23.560]  I've lost you all together.
[01:47:23.560 --> 01:47:24.560]  You might try.
[01:47:24.560 --> 01:47:25.560]  Hello?
[01:47:25.560 --> 01:47:29.560]  Trying to get that straightened out and call back in.
[01:47:29.560 --> 01:47:33.560]  Since I've lost you all together, I'm going to go to John in New York.
[01:47:33.560 --> 01:47:34.560]  Hello, John.
[01:47:34.560 --> 01:47:35.560]  Hello.
[01:47:35.560 --> 01:47:37.560]  Hi Randy, thank you.
[01:47:37.560 --> 01:47:38.560]  Thank you very much.
[01:47:38.560 --> 01:47:39.560]  How are you doing?
[01:47:39.560 --> 01:47:40.560]  I am doing good.
[01:47:40.560 --> 01:47:42.560]  What do you have for us today?
[01:47:42.560 --> 01:47:47.560]  Well, it's what you've got for me and I thank you.
[01:47:47.560 --> 01:47:52.320]  Well, it's what you've got for me and I thank you.
[01:47:52.320 --> 01:48:00.200]  We had talked about, I just have one question about pulling credit files.
[01:48:00.200 --> 01:48:04.760]  Debt collectors often pull credit files and it's not legal.
[01:48:04.760 --> 01:48:09.960]  Now, does that fall under the FDCPA or is it another law?
[01:48:09.960 --> 01:48:12.840]  I think it's FDC.
[01:48:12.840 --> 01:48:13.840]  I'm not sure.
[01:48:13.840 --> 01:48:14.840]  I'm not exactly sure.
[01:48:14.840 --> 01:48:17.680]  I've got a D. Debra here, she's not here right now.
[01:48:17.680 --> 01:48:23.320]  She can tell me she's addressed that before, but if you'll send me an email asking for
[01:48:23.320 --> 01:48:27.720]  that information, I'll forward it to her and get that information for you.
[01:48:27.720 --> 01:48:36.360]  Okay, the reason for that is we can circumvent the FDCPA because I've spoken to one or two
[01:48:36.360 --> 01:48:43.000]  attorneys who specialize in debt collector defense, you know, against debt collector
[01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:48.480]  to abusive debt collectors and they tell me the same thing that unfortunately when they're
[01:48:48.480 --> 01:48:54.480]  not under consumer law, so it's not under the FDCPA, I can't sue them for violating the
[01:48:54.480 --> 01:48:55.480]  FDCPA.
[01:48:55.480 --> 01:49:01.640]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:49:01.640 --> 01:49:07.320]  That went to something really specific, you used pronouns there.
[01:49:07.320 --> 01:49:10.160]  They are not under consumer law.
[01:49:10.160 --> 01:49:16.200]  Is that a general statement or is that a statement that was specific to your particular case?
[01:49:16.200 --> 01:49:21.680]  Well, I guess specific to my case.
[01:49:21.680 --> 01:49:28.920]  The debt collector is collecting on government debt, which is not consumer based and the
[01:49:28.920 --> 01:49:35.880]  FDCPA, according to the attorney, is only for consumer based debt.
[01:49:35.880 --> 01:49:45.080]  So did you remind the attorney that every remedy that is in the Fair Debt Collection
[01:49:45.080 --> 01:49:48.560]  Practices Act is also in the UCC?
[01:49:48.560 --> 01:49:53.000]  Oh, no, I did not.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:54.000]  That's right.
[01:49:54.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  You just reminded me.
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:50:00.640]  That's why I claim that the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the other consumer protection
[01:50:00.640 --> 01:50:03.720]  laws were a scam.
[01:50:03.720 --> 01:50:10.160]  They scammed us into believing that we have this short window in which to exercise our
[01:50:10.160 --> 01:50:15.680]  claim or we only have certain conditions under which we can exercise our claim.
[01:50:15.680 --> 01:50:21.200]  Well, our claim is not restricted to the consumer protection laws.
[01:50:21.200 --> 01:50:25.720]  Our claim is expanded by the Uniform Commercial Code.
[01:50:25.720 --> 01:50:33.920]  So if that's the case, then under the Uniform Commercial Code, I could go after them.
[01:50:33.920 --> 01:50:40.920]  Yes, and you might bring that up to your lawyer, but it could well be that your lawyer doesn't
[01:50:40.920 --> 01:50:42.920]  even know that.
[01:50:42.920 --> 01:50:43.920]  He probably doesn't.
[01:50:43.920 --> 01:50:44.920]  No.
[01:50:44.920 --> 01:50:47.840]  I've run across doctors that didn't know simple things.
[01:50:47.840 --> 01:50:53.960]  I've run across and most doctors don't, MD, you know, medical doctors, naturopathic doctors
[01:50:53.960 --> 01:50:58.800]  don't pretty much what medical doctors don't, and it's the same with attorneys.
[01:50:58.800 --> 01:51:04.240]  I have an attorney and a family, and I run this stuff past him, and he tells me I'm
[01:51:04.240 --> 01:51:05.240]  crazy.
[01:51:05.240 --> 01:51:11.240]  The traffic court is traffic court, and it's not corrupt, and so on and so forth.
[01:51:11.240 --> 01:51:12.240]  So they won't claim.
[01:51:12.240 --> 01:51:14.240]  They won't claim for any of it.
[01:51:14.240 --> 01:51:15.240]  Right.
[01:51:15.240 --> 01:51:16.720]  They live in a different place.
[01:51:16.720 --> 01:51:21.880]  It's a different time zone entirely, yes.
[01:51:21.880 --> 01:51:26.400]  So under the UCC, there might be remedy.
[01:51:26.400 --> 01:51:31.240]  Yes, and have you read the UCC yet?
[01:51:31.240 --> 01:51:33.440]  No, I haven't.
[01:51:33.440 --> 01:51:36.000]  Oh, my goodness.
[01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:40.480]  Oh, John, I don't believe this.
[01:51:40.480 --> 01:51:44.600]  Take that receiver and beat yourself around the eyes of the ears.
[01:51:44.600 --> 01:51:45.600]  I know.
[01:51:45.600 --> 01:51:46.600]  I know.
[01:51:46.600 --> 01:51:47.600]  I know.
[01:51:47.600 --> 01:51:51.840]  I've been a little preoccupied with life and death situations, so I haven't had time
[01:51:51.840 --> 01:51:52.840]  to read it.
[01:51:52.840 --> 01:51:59.720]  I've been gung-ho on other things, and unfortunately they take precedent, and I will read the
[01:51:59.720 --> 01:52:00.720]  UCC though.
[01:52:00.720 --> 01:52:02.920]  I will get to it.
[01:52:02.920 --> 01:52:08.320]  Under the UCC, there might be remedy because it doesn't apply to the SBCPA.
[01:52:08.320 --> 01:52:09.960]  All right.
[01:52:09.960 --> 01:52:16.480]  It's the law of contracts, and everything about debt collection is about contracts.
[01:52:16.480 --> 01:52:17.480]  Right.
[01:52:17.480 --> 01:52:24.360]  There's actually more remedy in the UCC than in the consumer protection laws.
[01:52:24.360 --> 01:52:25.360]  Right.
[01:52:25.360 --> 01:52:34.440]  More remedy in the UCC than consumer protection laws, okay?
[01:52:34.440 --> 01:52:44.160]  And there are none of those pesky one-year and two-year statutes of limitation.
[01:52:44.160 --> 01:52:49.880]  That's, in my opinion, is the reason they passed the consumer protection laws is to
[01:52:49.880 --> 01:52:57.560]  pull our focus away from the UCC and to the supposed consumer protection laws, and it
[01:52:57.560 --> 01:52:58.560]  worked.
[01:52:58.560 --> 01:52:59.560]  Right.
[01:52:59.560 --> 01:53:05.360]  So there's definitely under the, you say that it's definitely contained in the UCC,
[01:53:05.360 --> 01:53:07.360]  and I could go after them there.
[01:53:07.360 --> 01:53:08.360]  Absolutely.
[01:53:08.360 --> 01:53:15.040]  And you don't have these restrictions that you do with the consumer protection laws.
[01:53:15.040 --> 01:53:16.040]  Right.
[01:53:16.040 --> 01:53:17.040]  Okay.
[01:53:17.040 --> 01:53:22.040]  Now, next, I've got, real quick, I'll try to move along as fast as I can.
[01:53:22.040 --> 01:53:27.600]  With Leslie that you just spoke to, she sounds like she's got a wealth of information too.
[01:53:27.600 --> 01:53:28.600]  With Leslie-
[01:53:28.600 --> 01:53:34.400]  Oh, we don't call her bad grandma for nothing.
[01:53:34.400 --> 01:53:47.680]  I wish that I had the ability to write pleadings with the style and the sophistication that
[01:53:47.680 --> 01:53:48.680]  she does.
[01:53:48.680 --> 01:53:50.880]  She does really nice work.
[01:53:50.880 --> 01:53:52.680]  Yes, she does.
[01:53:52.680 --> 01:53:54.120]  She's my kind of girl.
[01:53:54.120 --> 01:53:58.520]  With Leslie's healthy style and declaratory judgment, it sounds like she's already done
[01:53:58.520 --> 01:53:59.520]  that.
[01:53:59.520 --> 01:54:00.520]  Yes.
[01:54:00.520 --> 01:54:05.240]  She's been after these folks for a long time.
[01:54:05.240 --> 01:54:07.540]  You never want to get her after you.
[01:54:07.540 --> 01:54:09.040]  She never lets go.
[01:54:09.040 --> 01:54:13.400]  Well, could, is there a way that you could help me?
[01:54:13.400 --> 01:54:20.640]  Because I'm having, I found some declaratory judgment forms, believe it or not.
[01:54:20.640 --> 01:54:25.320]  And I could send them to you so you could look at them, but I don't know one end of
[01:54:25.320 --> 01:54:26.320]  it from the other.
[01:54:26.320 --> 01:54:30.920]  It's a good thing I don't do medical like I do legal because I'd really be out in the
[01:54:30.920 --> 01:54:33.720]  forest someplace.
[01:54:33.720 --> 01:54:40.720]  If you want to talk to Leslie, send me an email asking for an invite and I will forward
[01:54:40.720 --> 01:54:42.800]  that to her.
[01:54:42.800 --> 01:54:49.640]  I'd never give out contact information unless somebody directs me to specifically.
[01:54:49.640 --> 01:54:53.880]  But if you want to, if you want to see if she'll help you, send me an email and I will
[01:54:53.880 --> 01:54:55.440]  forward it to her.
[01:54:55.440 --> 01:54:56.440]  Okay.
[01:54:56.440 --> 01:55:00.600]  Now, what was the other email I'm going to send you?
[01:55:00.600 --> 01:55:04.720]  There was another one.
[01:55:04.720 --> 01:55:05.720]  Yeah.
[01:55:05.720 --> 01:55:07.320]  You said to send you an email.
[01:55:07.320 --> 01:55:11.560]  Send me an email asking for an introduction to Leslie.
[01:55:11.560 --> 01:55:12.560]  Okay.
[01:55:12.560 --> 01:55:13.960]  And that, yeah, that's there.
[01:55:13.960 --> 01:55:18.000]  Send an email and we're ready to give you an invite from Leslie.
[01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  And then there was another, we were talking about when I first started out with the FDCPA
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:32.960]  and you said to send you, well, that's all right, that's all right, not a problem.
[01:55:32.960 --> 01:55:35.800]  I'll go back on my notes.
[01:55:35.800 --> 01:55:36.800]  Okay.
[01:55:36.800 --> 01:55:46.160]  Then that's, it's for those, anything else under the, no, under the UCC, I'm just thinking
[01:55:46.160 --> 01:55:53.920]  now that if they, meaning the debt collector, did not honor my debt validation letter, which
[01:55:53.920 --> 01:56:00.280]  they did not, is there something mentioned about that in the UCC, you think, and also?
[01:56:00.280 --> 01:56:01.280]  Yeah.
[01:56:01.280 --> 01:56:03.960]  Yes, but it's not called a debt validation letter.
[01:56:03.960 --> 01:56:09.060]  It will go to the validity of the claim.
[01:56:09.060 --> 01:56:12.480]  You can challenge the validity of the claim.
[01:56:12.480 --> 01:56:19.280]  They make a claim, you don't, and if you accept to check the claim, then the claim is valid
[01:56:19.280 --> 01:56:21.000]  on its face.
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:25.880]  If you don't accept the claim, then they have the duty to prove up the claim.
[01:56:25.880 --> 01:56:26.880]  Right.
[01:56:26.880 --> 01:56:33.080]  That's the letter I sent and they keep calling me and I keep putting them off.
[01:56:33.080 --> 01:56:36.000]  I know how to do it, you know, very simple.
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:40.240]  I just tell them, well, I'm not really here to answer questions.
[01:56:40.240 --> 01:56:46.720]  And they want to, they can't continue telling me what the businesses or the private business
[01:56:46.720 --> 01:56:47.720]  is about.
[01:56:47.720 --> 01:56:54.320]  They can't tell me that's private business, what it is, until they can validate, until
[01:56:54.320 --> 01:56:56.800]  they can verify some information.
[01:56:56.800 --> 01:56:59.160]  And I know that's a bunch of belonging.
[01:56:59.160 --> 01:57:04.560]  Well, they're trying to avoid litigation.
[01:57:04.560 --> 01:57:11.080]  They're trying to keep from being sued for harassing the wrong person.
[01:57:11.080 --> 01:57:17.960]  They had a woman in Kansas City, Missouri, they went after for a $1,500 debt that was
[01:57:17.960 --> 01:57:20.960]  owed by someone with the same name as her.
[01:57:20.960 --> 01:57:21.960]  Right.
[01:57:21.960 --> 01:57:25.760]  She tried to, she tried to tell them that and they wouldn't listen.
[01:57:25.760 --> 01:57:31.040]  They went after her and they were so outrageous, she finally sued them.
[01:57:31.040 --> 01:57:43.720]  And the jury came back with a, claiming against them a verdict of $80 million.
[01:57:43.720 --> 01:57:49.560]  They were PO'd, but so they're trying to be careful and keep themselves out of court
[01:57:49.560 --> 01:57:50.560]  that way.
[01:57:50.560 --> 01:57:55.120]  But then that hamstrings them if you want to be compliant.
[01:57:55.120 --> 01:57:56.600]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:57:56.600 --> 01:58:03.440]  I was a debt collector, so I know, but it's a lot of baloney too.
[01:58:03.440 --> 01:58:09.360]  They want me to help them to sue me, and I'm not going to do that.
[01:58:09.360 --> 01:58:10.960]  I'm not that stupid.
[01:58:10.960 --> 01:58:11.960]  So anyhow.
[01:58:11.960 --> 01:58:15.880]  Wait, wait, you're not that stupid.
[01:58:15.880 --> 01:58:16.880]  That begs the question.
[01:58:16.880 --> 01:58:17.880]  Huh?
[01:58:17.880 --> 01:58:23.440]  If you're not that stupid, how stupid are you, John?
[01:58:23.440 --> 01:58:29.080]  Okay, we're about to go to break.
[01:58:29.080 --> 01:58:31.800]  I'm having a little fun at your expense.
[01:58:31.800 --> 01:58:39.280]  Randy Kelton, rule of law radio are calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:58:39.280 --> 01:58:50.280]  We'll be right back.
[01:58:50.280 --> 01:58:55.720]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.720 --> 01:58:58.520]  because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.520 --> 01:59:03.920]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[01:59:03.920 --> 01:59:07.160]  the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[01:59:07.160 --> 01:59:08.960]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:08.960 --> 01:59:14.860]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[01:59:14.860 --> 01:59:18.600]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.600 --> 01:59:23.800]  Most in profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into
[01:59:23.800 --> 01:59:28.320]  the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.320 --> 01:59:33.460]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.460 --> 01:59:43.880]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[01:59:43.880 --> 01:59:47.960]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:47.960 --> 01:59:55.960]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.