[00:00.000 --> 00:29.640]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22 now.
[00:29.640 --> 00:41.280]  It's over $16.68 now. Texas Crude $65.51 a barrel. Bitcoin $6,902.19. Ethereum $420.80.
[00:41.280 --> 00:55.760]  Bitcoin Cash $652.90 and Finanly Lite Coins $114.34 a crypto coin.
[00:55.760 --> 01:02.920]  Today in History the year 1968 President Lyndon B. Johnson signs the Civil Rights Act of 1968
[01:02.920 --> 01:07.720]  which prohibited private businesses from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex or national
[01:07.720 --> 01:12.880]  origin. It also prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial
[01:12.880 --> 01:18.600]  segregation in public schools and employment and public accommodations for places of business.
[01:18.600 --> 01:29.000]  In recent news tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack on civilians
[01:29.000 --> 01:33.280]  in the city of Douma which left 40 dead and many injured. An attack which is being blamed
[01:33.280 --> 01:37.880]  on the democratically elected president of Syria Bashar al-Assad by the United States
[01:37.880 --> 01:42.440]  and on Israel by Russia. Either accusatory narrative without any verified evidence as
[01:42.440 --> 01:47.440]  of yet. President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows to shoot down any
[01:47.440 --> 01:51.600]  and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready Russia because they will be coming in nice
[01:51.600 --> 01:55.900]  and new and smart. Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners with a gas
[01:55.900 --> 02:00.560]  killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it. Many in the West including President Trump
[02:00.560 --> 02:05.600]  have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted by Assad and
[02:05.600 --> 02:10.520]  his forces. Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since yesterday
[02:10.520 --> 02:14.560]  for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the side of
[02:14.560 --> 02:19.160]  the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support during Syria's
[02:19.160 --> 02:24.160]  seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government of Syria and anti-Assad
[02:24.160 --> 02:29.040]  Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments, with ISIS being one
[02:29.040 --> 02:33.520]  of the more notorious splinter groups of the American-backed Syrian rebels. Now, surprise
[02:33.520 --> 02:38.960]  then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakoba posted on Facebook that smart
[02:38.960 --> 02:43.680]  missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate government which has been
[02:43.680 --> 02:48.080]  fighting terrorists? Or is this a trick to destroy all traces with a smart missile strike
[02:48.080 --> 03:14.080]  and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors to look at?
[03:14.080 --> 03:19.080]  This is what happens when you calm the cops. This is what happens when you calm the cops.
[03:19.080 --> 03:23.080]  This is what happens when you calm the cops. You get your rights violated or you all get
[03:23.080 --> 03:24.080]  shot.
[03:24.080 --> 03:28.080]  I think the people being victimized by criminal cops. Psychopathic predators terrorize the
[03:28.080 --> 03:32.080]  neighborhood blocks. Dequip with pepper spray, mate, cup, tazers and glass. They like serial
[03:32.080 --> 03:36.080]  killers acting out subliminal thoughts. Forget what you talk. These cops have got a license
[03:36.080 --> 03:40.080]  to kill. Witness intimidation means that they can use it at will. Code of silence means
[03:40.080 --> 03:44.080]  that the people never let out a quill. And if they go to court they know the judge will
[03:44.080 --> 03:48.080]  make them a deal for real. That's why they're stopping me. Locking me up and stopping me.
[03:48.080 --> 03:52.080]  Complicating my property, talking in my demography. Making the poor commodity profit and off of
[03:52.080 --> 03:56.080]  poverty. And court of apology, support and prison economy. Yeah, no one makes money when
[03:56.080 --> 04:00.080]  the violence stops. Hatin' duality is the way to make a criminal cry. Blood in the gut is
[04:00.080 --> 04:04.080]  out of reach whether they bread at the top. And that's why this is what happens when you
[04:04.080 --> 04:10.080]  call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when you
[04:10.080 --> 04:14.080]  call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops. You get your rights violated
[04:14.080 --> 04:19.200]  or you all get shot. This is what happens when you call the cops. This is what happens when
[04:19.200 --> 04:24.080]  you call the cops. This is what happens when you call the cops. You get your rights
[04:24.080 --> 04:28.080]  violated or you all get shot, baby.
[04:28.080 --> 04:36.780]  Alright folks, good evening. This is the Monday night rule of law radio show with your host
[04:36.780 --> 04:45.920]  Eddie Kredge. It is July 16th, 2018. We are live tonight. We are not a replay. Uh, that
[04:45.920 --> 04:53.200]  being said, we're halfway through the month of July in 2018. We still have the fundraiser
[04:53.200 --> 04:59.040]  going on. I remember a time when the fundraiser only had to run the first quarter of the year,
[04:59.040 --> 05:04.960]  not the entire year in order for us to get enough to keep the network on the air. I
[05:04.960 --> 05:09.880]  know times are getting hard out there folks, but believe me, they're not any softer on
[05:09.880 --> 05:17.360]  this end. And the benefit that we try to provide to y'all, if you could just afford five or
[05:17.360 --> 05:23.680]  ten dollars a month every month, it would keep us above water and treading easily enough
[05:23.680 --> 05:27.720]  to get the bills covered at least for the number of listeners that we know we've got
[05:27.720 --> 05:34.360]  out there in radio land. I mean, any little bit helps. The fundraiser is one way that
[05:34.360 --> 05:38.960]  you can do that and also get something in return besides just supporting the network
[05:38.960 --> 05:44.120]  and getting the message and information that we have to deliver to you. But on the fundraiser,
[05:44.120 --> 05:49.480]  you actually get to win a prize. In this case, that nifty gun. Okay. If you don't have the
[05:49.480 --> 05:55.560]  details, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and check out the information there on what is being
[05:55.560 --> 06:00.480]  offered in the drawing for the fundraiser and get that information and donate what you
[06:00.480 --> 06:06.000]  can. Every twenty five dollars, get your name into the bucket each time for each unit of
[06:06.000 --> 06:14.320]  twenty five dollars or more. Okay. So again, you buy my seminar, you're entered in it ten
[06:14.320 --> 06:20.440]  times, two hundred fifty bucks, twenty or ten entries, there you go. Okay. So everything
[06:20.440 --> 06:25.000]  you get on the network adds to that as well as just whatever you were care to donate as
[06:25.000 --> 06:27.920]  long as you do it through the method of getting it in there and letting them know that it's
[06:27.920 --> 06:33.960]  for the network and they'll put your name in for the twenty five dollars. So now we've
[06:33.960 --> 06:40.080]  got the issue of keeping us on the air. I'm going to open up the phone lines and let y'all
[06:40.080 --> 06:46.560]  call in and talk to us on the air like we're prone to doing here on a regular basis and
[06:46.560 --> 06:51.480]  see what y'all got to say. But do me a favor. Okay. I know that a lot of this show is about
[06:51.480 --> 06:57.200]  helping people with problems that they have cases and everything that they help with and
[06:57.200 --> 07:03.720]  I've got no problem with helping out with that wherever I can, however I can. But if
[07:03.720 --> 07:12.160]  you've benefited from what you heard on these shows, this show over the years, while you're
[07:12.160 --> 07:18.720]  on here talking, please let the folks out there know how we've helped you because it
[07:18.720 --> 07:24.640]  is your word of mouth and you're standing behind what you get from us and how you've
[07:24.640 --> 07:30.280]  used it to help yourself and others that is going to be the main selling point on getting
[07:30.280 --> 07:37.320]  people interested in being educated on the issues that we bring to you. And we bring
[07:37.320 --> 07:43.800]  a lot of them. And we bring them to you with the facts laid out and tell you exactly where
[07:43.800 --> 07:49.880]  to go verify those facts for yourself. I have said it every time I've been on the air or
[07:49.880 --> 07:58.480]  at least I've implied it every time I've been on the air. Don't ever take my word for anything.
[07:58.480 --> 08:03.960]  I give you information. My expectation is that you're smart enough to know that you need
[08:03.960 --> 08:08.960]  to verify it and you will check it out. And I will tell you exactly where you can go do
[08:08.960 --> 08:17.520]  that and you can check for yourself if it's not the correct source. But folks, it is you
[08:17.520 --> 08:23.480]  that is making it possible for people to learn about us and what we have to offer here and
[08:23.480 --> 08:32.360]  how we do it. As much as there's no other way to describe it, the notoriety that we
[08:32.360 --> 08:39.320]  get as hosts on this show is not the reason that we do it. We do it because we think it's
[08:39.320 --> 08:45.880]  important for you people out there to have this information, to have this understanding
[08:45.880 --> 08:55.200]  of that information and to understand where the government has tentacles that stem from
[08:55.200 --> 09:02.120]  that information and reach into places it was not intended to reach ever. And most of
[09:02.120 --> 09:12.360]  all, what can be done about it? And as Benjamin Franklin said, we either all stand together
[09:12.360 --> 09:18.640]  or we'll all hang separately. And that's just the way it works. So if we don't start standing
[09:18.640 --> 09:26.720]  together and taking a stand against what is happening to us as not only America, but as
[09:26.720 --> 09:35.800]  individuals and people, then what is the point of even claiming the Constitution exists?
[09:35.800 --> 09:41.480]  Much less has any force behind it, which is supposed to be us, by the way. It's not something
[09:41.480 --> 09:47.680]  that's going to defend itself. It's not something that's capable of doing so. It has always
[09:47.680 --> 09:55.040]  relied upon the people to be its protector. And when I say the people, I am not talking
[09:55.040 --> 10:00.440]  about those holding public office. I am not talking about those that claim authority that
[10:00.440 --> 10:08.640]  they never had in the first place. I am talking about every day, Joe's like you and me that
[10:08.640 --> 10:14.440]  are responsible for holding accountable those people that we entrusted with the power of
[10:14.440 --> 10:20.720]  our public office and who have betrayed it, spat upon it and everything else they could
[10:20.720 --> 10:29.000]  do to it to prove just how disloyal and disinterested they are in the American dreams, ideals and
[10:29.000 --> 10:37.720]  way of life. If you're not willing to put up, then you need to shut up. If you're not
[10:37.720 --> 10:44.600]  willing to work, then you're not helping anyone. And when you're not helping, you're hurting,
[10:44.600 --> 10:51.880]  you're hindering, you're a stumbling block. Now lots of people don't like to hear that,
[10:51.880 --> 10:57.800]  but most people these days don't like to hear any sort of truth because the truth is too
[10:57.800 --> 11:06.760]  painful. The truth is too in your face. The truth requires you to be spit and polish,
[11:06.760 --> 11:16.640]  whereas non-truth doesn't care. We have got to change how we do things. We have got to
[11:16.640 --> 11:21.840]  change our mindset about those things and we have really, really got to get an attitude
[11:21.840 --> 11:30.960]  check for ourselves and those who work for us in place, enforced and upheld in a constitutional
[11:30.960 --> 11:39.680]  manner. Now I want to tell you right now, what they claim authority to prevent us from doing
[11:39.680 --> 11:48.400]  is exactly the thing the Constitution protected our right to do. And that is to abolish and
[11:48.400 --> 11:55.200]  do away with any form of government that no longer serves the people of the individual
[11:55.200 --> 12:02.280]  states as well as the collective federal states. And I mean that only in the sense of reference,
[12:02.280 --> 12:09.200]  not literally, okay? But the federal government is accountable to the state governments in
[12:09.200 --> 12:15.040]  every single way you can imagine because its authority came from them. The state government's
[12:15.040 --> 12:22.960]  authority came from us. They have no rightful power to deny us in the ability to take every
[12:22.960 --> 12:29.400]  shred of power and authority they have away from them and hold them accountable for any
[12:29.400 --> 12:38.200]  abuse that they've engaged in with it. That's our prerogative. And the Constitution and the
[12:38.200 --> 12:44.160]  Bill of Rights was written in a way to guarantee that we had the means available to do exactly
[12:44.160 --> 12:58.680]  that. The system itself is not the part that's actually broken. It's those who control it.
[12:58.680 --> 13:05.120]  They manipulate it. They disregard it. They alter it. They do what they want regardless
[13:05.120 --> 13:11.880]  of the rule of law. And because of that, the rest of us suffer. The ideals and dreams of
[13:11.880 --> 13:17.640]  America are getting slowly dismantled and flushed down the toilet and the people responsible
[13:17.640 --> 13:27.520]  are enriching themselves at our expense while they're doing it. This must stop. But only
[13:27.520 --> 13:37.920]  you can make it stop. In the entire history of mankind there has never been a single form
[13:37.920 --> 13:47.200]  of government created that has ever given back one iota of power that it has usurped
[13:47.200 --> 13:58.840]  from the people. Not one anywhere ever. If you think crying, complaining, providing testimony
[13:58.840 --> 14:07.960]  in their hearings is going to fix that, you are mistaken. When they believe they cannot
[14:07.960 --> 14:18.040]  be held accountable for what they do, they have no reason to change it. None. That has
[14:18.040 --> 14:26.720]  always been the nature of the beast that will not change. So ladies and gentlemen, what
[14:26.720 --> 14:35.480]  choice do we have to fix this these days? Those who are responsible won't listen. Those
[14:35.480 --> 14:42.480]  who are responsible won't do. Those who are responsible lie, cheat, steal, abuse, avoid
[14:42.480 --> 14:50.320]  anything and everything. They operate in complete denial of wrongdoing and corruption in order
[14:50.320 --> 14:55.160]  to continue the status quo that lines their pockets and provides them with a reason to
[14:55.160 --> 15:02.160]  get up every day to continue their theft of our wealth and our rights for their own enrichment.
[15:02.160 --> 15:12.280]  It's got to stop. It's got to change. We've got to do it. So when are we going to do it?
[15:12.280 --> 15:17.320]  How are we going to do it? Who is going to do it? Well, the who is all of us. The how
[15:17.320 --> 15:24.920]  is by whatever means we must in order to get rid of those that have done what they've done
[15:24.920 --> 15:34.320]  and to punish them accordingly for what they've done. Because the moment you pretend that
[15:34.320 --> 15:41.200]  punishment isn't deserved and isn't forthcoming, all you're doing is creating an impetus for
[15:41.200 --> 15:47.080]  the next group to do it again. And you've taught them a lesson on how to do it differently
[15:47.080 --> 15:54.880]  so as to be less detectable and less noticeable and still get the same result. Never underestimate
[15:54.880 --> 16:08.480]  the ingenuity of people to con others into accepting the things they want them to believe.
[16:08.480 --> 16:16.160]  There have been con men in all of our history that have created illusions of such extravagant
[16:16.160 --> 16:23.920]  degree to successfully carry out a plan of fraud against their target. And in this day
[16:23.920 --> 16:30.200]  and age, with all of the technology at their disposal that they have, that is no longer
[16:30.200 --> 16:37.200]  something that can be ignored as a possibility. And it is no longer something that is so easy
[16:37.200 --> 16:44.280]  to see and prove on its face for what it is. It's too easy to deceive now.
[16:44.280 --> 16:52.320]  All right, folks, y'all hang on. Calling number is 512-646-1984. I'll start taking calls on
[16:52.320 --> 16:59.320]  the other side so y'all give us a call and get in line and we'll be right back.
[16:59.320 --> 17:10.440]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by Central Texas
[17:10.440 --> 17:17.720]  Gunworks. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance
[17:17.720 --> 17:23.960]  to win. From Central Texas Gunworks, the grand prize up for grabs is the Spikes Tactical
[17:23.960 --> 17:30.960]  AR-15. More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book,
[17:30.960 --> 17:37.080]  Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's Traffic Seminar and get ten
[17:37.080 --> 17:43.880]  chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the
[17:43.880 --> 17:49.560]  shows on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality
[17:49.560 --> 17:55.640]  programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Go to
[17:55.640 --> 18:01.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[18:01.000 --> 18:06.320]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:06.320 --> 18:10.560]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. Michael Mearris has
[18:10.560 --> 18:15.520]  won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll
[18:15.520 --> 18:20.360]  get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil
[18:20.360 --> 18:25.520]  rights statutes. What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons? How to
[18:25.520 --> 18:30.000]  answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[18:30.000 --> 18:35.040]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael
[18:35.040 --> 18:40.520]  Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation
[18:40.520 --> 18:45.600]  is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click
[18:45.600 --> 18:52.600]  on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:52.600 --> 19:12.600]  or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:12.600 --> 19:40.600]  All right, folks. We are back.
[19:40.600 --> 19:51.800]  This is rule of law radio. The calling number is 512-646-1984. And we have callers up on
[19:51.800 --> 19:57.680]  the board now, so let's get with it and see who we have. First one up appears to be Carl
[19:57.680 --> 20:10.800]  and Orgen, aka Truth Raider. Raider, howdy. Okay. Now, I've benefited from your program.
[20:10.800 --> 20:20.800]  Took a little while, but I've benefited from your program. They're leaving me alone now.
[20:20.800 --> 20:27.800]  All right, the previous convictions, you know, you heard about that. I had difficulty with
[20:27.800 --> 20:30.800]  that before. What I'm trying to do with that, I did that. I filed, like, two pleadings for
[20:30.800 --> 20:35.800]  less, pleadings to the city for remedy. Now, I haven't heard back from them yet. That's
[20:35.800 --> 20:40.360]  what I'm doing right now, so I benefit from the program. No doubt about that. And I'm
[20:40.360 --> 20:46.080]  looking to get my fourth victory pretty soon. I have a so-called, unless they cancel it,
[20:46.080 --> 20:54.200]  there is a fourth victory coming up because this is stemming from a February stop in which
[20:54.200 --> 21:01.080]  the officer impounded my truck as well. They took three months, but they refunded the towing
[21:01.080 --> 21:09.080]  expenses and the city's release fees. It's about $315 total. But yeah, I've benefited
[21:09.080 --> 21:15.560]  from all that. But I have yet to see it all up on the blog because this is my most successful
[21:15.560 --> 21:23.160]  victory concerning the judge, finding that the city failed to meet its burden, and proving
[21:23.160 --> 21:29.040]  that I was driving while suspended. So, as you know, as I told you, that they found me
[21:29.040 --> 21:30.040]  not guilty.
[21:30.040 --> 21:37.040]  Well, see, here's something that they never do on a suspended or a failure to display
[21:37.040 --> 21:43.000]  that they are actually required to do. In order for them to prove suspension or to prove
[21:43.000 --> 21:50.440]  failure to display, they have to actually assert and prove issuance. They have to actually
[21:50.440 --> 21:54.280]  prove on the record that you were issued such a license.
[21:54.280 --> 21:55.280]  Right.
[21:55.280 --> 21:57.280]  And they never do that.
[21:57.280 --> 21:58.280]  Right.
[21:58.280 --> 22:05.280]  Well, he was a DMV reporter in the previous cases. The officer, all he does is gives his
[22:05.280 --> 22:12.720]  testimony and then presents a DMV report that I had a license or article, and I count number
[22:12.720 --> 22:13.720]  of my...
[22:13.720 --> 22:16.480]  Who presented a DMV report?
[22:16.480 --> 22:21.400]  The officer during the so-called tribunal, or they call it a trial.
[22:21.400 --> 22:22.400]  Okay.
[22:22.400 --> 22:28.720]  Yeah, during the so-called trial, they present that. Here's the report from the DMV saying
[22:28.720 --> 22:37.120]  that I have a suspended privilege. That's what they call suspended privilege on this
[22:37.120 --> 22:41.720]  and such and such a date, and here's the report from DMV. So, that's their proof and evidence
[22:41.720 --> 22:51.720]  that I failed to meet my obligation to comply under the vehicle code, which is all commercial.
[22:51.720 --> 22:56.400]  So, it's just commercial infractions anyways, that has nothing to do with me. But, yeah,
[22:56.400 --> 23:00.800]  that's what they... And then judges the... Listen to a little bit who I've got to say,
[23:00.800 --> 23:04.800]  or finish up the... Have I any questions to the officer? Or they turn around and say,
[23:04.800 --> 23:08.600]  okay, all right, well, I... Let's see. Let's see. Open the book. Do I find you guilty for
[23:08.600 --> 23:13.040]  this? And that's probably also kind of like proof and assurance of registration, blah,
[23:13.040 --> 23:18.320]  blah, blah, and that's it. That's what they did in the past. They just finally couldn't
[23:18.320 --> 23:19.320]  do that.
[23:19.320 --> 23:20.320]  Okay.
[23:20.320 --> 23:29.800]  And, strangely enough, the officer at this time didn't use that because I can... I objected
[23:29.800 --> 23:31.280]  to that report.
[23:31.280 --> 23:37.880]  Right. He didn't personally create that report. He didn't personally pull that report.
[23:37.880 --> 23:44.200]  Any information in that report is hearsay. He can't testify to it.
[23:44.200 --> 23:45.200]  Right.
[23:45.200 --> 23:50.640]  He didn't enter the data that's in that report. He cannot testify to its veracity when it
[23:50.640 --> 23:54.720]  was entered, whether it's changed, when it was changed, who changed it. He can't testify
[23:54.720 --> 23:56.200]  to any of that.
[23:56.200 --> 23:57.200]  Right.
[23:57.200 --> 23:58.200]  Okay.
[23:58.200 --> 24:04.400]  And if that information is just a computer generated record, that's like a broken record.
[24:04.400 --> 24:09.440]  But the point still being that who input the information that's in that record? Was it
[24:09.440 --> 24:10.440]  this cop?
[24:10.440 --> 24:17.760]  The answer is no. And he cannot testify to what's in a computer record that he did not
[24:17.760 --> 24:18.760]  create.
[24:18.760 --> 24:26.000]  Exactly. Not like that. I challenge where the officer has a certification to be a traffic
[24:26.000 --> 24:34.760]  officer in the first place. Does he have a separate certification? Or is he... Is somehow
[24:34.760 --> 24:38.040]  he a state trooper? You have any type of certification that you're also a state trooper? As well
[24:38.040 --> 24:41.760]  as being a municipal officer as well? No answer to that.
[24:41.760 --> 24:46.560]  Well, of course there's no answer to that because he isn't either one.
[24:46.560 --> 24:52.000]  Well, they're trying to share if that's in their contract with the police officers.
[24:52.000 --> 24:56.720]  That's how the process goes, right?
[24:56.720 --> 25:02.120]  In some cases, yes. But also the county will sometimes appoint them as traffic enforcement,
[25:02.120 --> 25:07.120]  but the county still must get them certified properly before they can do that. Plus, there
[25:07.120 --> 25:12.160]  is the issue once again that in Oregon, the statutes very clearly say, as in Washington
[25:12.160 --> 25:19.000]  state, that the statutes deal only with commercial motor vehicles, not with anything else. It's
[25:19.000 --> 25:20.000]  commerce.
[25:20.000 --> 25:25.960]  Correct. I challenge that over and over again, commerce. Seven interrogatories were filed
[25:25.960 --> 25:31.160]  30 days prior to that trial, so the judge had the ample opportunity to look at the questions
[25:31.160 --> 25:33.640]  and read them through.
[25:33.640 --> 25:38.600]  And the seven interrogatories you're referring to is the ones that are up on an article on
[25:38.600 --> 25:47.920]  my legal blog at towoflaw.wordpress.com, T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W, dot wordpress.com. There is an article
[25:47.920 --> 25:52.600]  up there called civil infractions and what to do if your state has them. In that article
[25:52.600 --> 25:59.520]  are seven specific interrogatories. The reason those interrogatories are important is because
[25:59.520 --> 26:06.560]  where states treat these as civil infractions, there can never be probable cause to seize
[26:06.560 --> 26:13.680]  someone without a warrant because there's no crime in a civil infraction. Therefore,
[26:13.680 --> 26:22.760]  civil suspicion and probable cause do not exist. So a seizure without a warrant is patently
[26:22.760 --> 26:30.440]  unconstitutional and illegal and on its face unreasonable under said constitution and law.
[26:30.440 --> 26:40.840]  Correct. I emphasize that all of these infractions are all commercial infractions, not the general
[26:40.840 --> 26:47.080]  public. They're commercial infractions. So where can it possibly apply to the public,
[26:47.080 --> 26:50.280]  the private users of the roadway?
[26:50.280 --> 26:51.280]  Right.
[26:51.280 --> 26:57.280]  So I have a friend of mine that's got a little bit of a bigger problem than I've got. He's
[26:57.280 --> 26:59.480]  got the IRS knocking on his door.
[26:59.480 --> 27:05.840]  Well, this is not an IRS show. I don't talk to people about IRS on the air. Too many
[27:05.840 --> 27:10.120]  people listening get too many misconceptions and do too many stupid things and one of the
[27:10.120 --> 27:14.320]  worst agencies in the world to do stupid things with.
[27:14.320 --> 27:19.400]  Right. But your buddy Dave Champion is the guy that he needs to talk to.
[27:19.400 --> 27:22.920]  That's absolutely who he needs to talk to.
[27:22.920 --> 27:27.000]  So could you give me some information I can give to him about Dave?
[27:27.000 --> 27:31.640]  Yeah. Go on the Internet and do a search for taxrevolt.us.
[27:31.640 --> 27:32.640]  Taxrevolt.us.
[27:32.640 --> 27:40.240]  Okay. You can also just do a search for income tax shattering the myth and it'll take you
[27:40.240 --> 27:46.960]  to his website. He's also on Facebook. He has that group or a light page on income tax
[27:46.960 --> 27:50.920]  sharing the myth. He's on there under Dave Champion. There's all kinds of ways to get
[27:50.920 --> 27:51.920]  in touch with him.
[27:51.920 --> 27:59.040]  Okay. I get that to him. I want to see him next year because they issued apparently three
[27:59.040 --> 28:04.320]  warrants for his arrest. Something like that.
[28:04.320 --> 28:07.320]  The IRS normally does not issue warrants of arrest.
[28:07.320 --> 28:08.320]  Okay.
[28:08.320 --> 28:12.560]  The only way that they could issue warrants of arrest is if there's been an indictment
[28:12.560 --> 28:13.560]  for tax evasion.
[28:13.560 --> 28:19.320]  All right. I'll get back to him and tell him about that.
[28:19.320 --> 28:26.600]  They may issue warrants demanding he turn over certain records unless he's been indicted.
[28:26.600 --> 28:31.120]  I doubt very seriously there's any specifically for his arrest.
[28:31.120 --> 28:34.960]  Just going along with what he told me, he said that they were going to do that.
[28:34.960 --> 28:39.040]  Well, you know as well as I do. People read what they want and what they see.
[28:39.040 --> 28:43.720]  All right. I think they're just trying to threaten them. They're just trying to scare
[28:43.720 --> 28:44.720]  them.
[28:44.720 --> 28:51.600]  Well, what he received may say we will issue warrants, but that is not the same as having
[28:51.600 --> 28:53.280]  actually done so.
[28:53.280 --> 28:59.520]  Yeah. All right. Okay. I'll do that. All right. Well, by now what happens in the next
[28:59.520 --> 29:05.920]  couple of weeks is supposedly you see if they carry out this trial as we stated it from
[29:05.920 --> 29:09.840]  some six months ago. So it's going to be somewhere around August 6. Another traffic
[29:09.840 --> 29:15.760]  trial. We'll see if they go ahead and send me a letter canceling that. More than likely
[29:15.760 --> 29:18.960]  there's a good chance they may throw that out too as well. So that will be victory number
[29:18.960 --> 29:27.360]  four, hopefully coming up. And then I'll add the coaching with you. So on that note, I'm
[29:27.360 --> 29:32.320]  out of fear you're caught up and the victories are starting to mount back right now and they're
[29:32.320 --> 29:33.320]  leaving me alone.
[29:33.320 --> 29:37.280]  All right. Well, good luck and good luck in the lawsuit because that's the only way we're
[29:37.280 --> 29:40.560]  going to make them stop is to sue them and make them account of why they're on pocket
[29:40.560 --> 29:45.160]  or at least make sure that they understand that we could get it out of their pocket.
[29:45.160 --> 29:47.160]  All right. Ready to face the call in.
[29:47.160 --> 29:53.920]  Thanks a lot. Yes, sir. You too. All right, folks, this is rule of law radio. We'll be
[29:53.920 --> 29:54.920]  right back.
[29:54.920 --> 30:09.680]  I only have eyes for you. Soon store mannequins may be singing that tune. They're being outfitted
[30:09.680 --> 30:14.800]  with cameras to watch us while we shop. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details
[30:14.800 --> 30:44.240]  after this.
[30:45.800 --> 30:51.120]  It's disturbing enough that big brother governments use facial recognition technology to identify
[30:51.120 --> 30:56.520]  and track people on the streets. Now clothing companies in Europe, Canada and America are
[30:56.520 --> 31:01.880]  getting in on the act. So where do they hide the cameras? In the eyes of mannequins. That's
[31:01.880 --> 31:07.320]  right. Those glamorous plastic ladies in the display windows may be watching you back.
[31:07.320 --> 31:13.080]  They're called eye seers and their job is to log the age, gender and race of passersby
[31:13.080 --> 31:18.520]  so retailers can devise new schemes to get you to buy. But hang on, aren't mannequins
[31:18.520 --> 31:24.480]  spooky enough already? This is taking weird science to a whole new level. I'm Dr. Catherine
[31:24.480 --> 31:31.920]  Albrecht for startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.920 --> 31:37.280]  This is building seven, a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[31:37.280 --> 31:42.720]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1500 architects and engineers concluded
[31:42.720 --> 31:46.680]  it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their
[31:46.680 --> 31:51.400]  lives to thousands of my fellow force responders at night. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm
[31:51.400 --> 31:54.720]  a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:54.720 --> 32:01.200]  I'm the father who lost his son. We're Americans and we deserve the truth. Go to RememberBuilding7.org
[32:01.200 --> 32:02.200]  today.
[32:02.200 --> 32:07.720]  RuletLaw Radio is proud to offer the RuletLaw Traffic Seminar. In today's America we live
[32:07.720 --> 32:11.440]  in a us against them society. If we the people are ever going to have a free society then
[32:11.440 --> 32:15.240]  we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. Among those rights are the right
[32:15.240 --> 32:18.880]  to travel freely from place to place, the right to act in our own private capacity and most
[32:18.880 --> 32:23.080]  importantly the right to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive
[32:23.080 --> 32:27.560]  opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. Former Sheriff's
[32:27.560 --> 32:31.560]  Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with RuletLaw Radio has put together the most comprehensive
[32:31.560 --> 32:35.200]  teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to
[32:35.200 --> 32:38.880]  hold courts to the rule of law. You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.880 --> 32:43.240]  by going to RuletLawRadio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive
[32:43.240 --> 32:47.440]  a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio
[32:47.440 --> 32:51.560]  of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource
[32:51.560 --> 32:56.320]  material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuletLawRadio.com.
[32:56.320 --> 33:04.320]  Order your copy today and together we can have free society we all want and deserve.
[33:04.320 --> 33:11.320]  For free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:34.320 --> 33:42.680]  Oh, you absolutely are on such a highway in America these days. Believe me, you can't
[33:42.680 --> 33:47.000]  get anywhere in America without traveling down the highway to hell because you're liable
[33:47.000 --> 33:52.680]  to get attacked at any point by someone claiming to have authority to punish you for looking
[33:52.680 --> 34:00.760]  out your window sideways. You just don't know, unfortunately, but you're going to learn.
[34:00.760 --> 34:05.160]  You're going to learn why the founding fathers had the foresight to arrange the Bill of Rights
[34:05.160 --> 34:11.280]  the way they did, especially the Second Amendment. Okay, and you're going to learn why you should
[34:11.280 --> 34:16.680]  have been fighting harder, talking louder and being more present every time the issue
[34:16.680 --> 34:24.160]  of the Second Amendment and banishing it as a right was raised. You're going to learn.
[34:24.160 --> 34:30.840]  That being said, let's go to John in New York. John, do you have a question? Hi, I thank
[34:30.840 --> 34:38.200]  you very kindly. Love your show. Oh, thank you. In New York State, traffic violations
[34:38.200 --> 34:45.880]  are handled in criminal court, in criminal court. Now, here's a situation that happened.
[34:45.880 --> 34:50.800]  I think it's important what the officer said step by step. So let me tell you step by step
[34:50.800 --> 34:57.400]  in 30 seconds, because I think he may be contradicting himself. The officer stopped my relative
[34:57.400 --> 35:03.760]  and said, you weren't wearing your seat belt. The witness, riding in the front seat with
[35:03.760 --> 35:13.040]  my relative, piped up and said he was wearing it, and I'll swear to that. And the driver
[35:13.040 --> 35:19.960]  said, I was wearing it. That is correct, officer. You know what the definition of to wear is,
[35:19.960 --> 35:24.880]  to have honor about one's person. Then the officer said, well, you weren't wearing it
[35:24.880 --> 35:31.040]  correctly. It was under your arm. Now, the ticket says he wasn't wearing his seat belt.
[35:31.040 --> 35:37.640]  Now, I'm going to say nothing and let you tell me all about it. Well, the thing about
[35:37.640 --> 35:43.840]  it is, is how does the statute define wearing? That's where most people tend to screw up.
[35:43.840 --> 35:48.880]  Just because there is a definition for wearing in the common English dictionary, that does
[35:48.880 --> 35:54.160]  not mean that's how the legislature for the state defined it in any given statute. That's
[35:54.160 --> 35:59.480]  first and foremost part of the problem. I can tell you what it is. In the United States,
[35:59.480 --> 36:05.680]  it does mention that it should be worn across the lap properly, and it describes it. And
[36:05.680 --> 36:10.960]  I think it says you have to have it across your chest and not under your arm. I think
[36:10.960 --> 36:15.880]  that's what it says. And that would probably be accurate. Okay.
[36:15.880 --> 36:22.400]  Now, my relative was wearing his seat belt that he had it on correctly. Now, this doesn't
[36:22.400 --> 36:27.320]  prove anything, but I'm going to mention it. It shows a pattern. Whenever I've been in
[36:27.320 --> 36:32.160]  the car with him, he always has his seat belt on. Now, that doesn't mean out of a hundred
[36:32.160 --> 36:38.800]  times, one time, he couldn't have forgotten to put it on. But he had it on properly. And
[36:38.800 --> 36:43.560]  I know him. If he says he had it on properly, I have to go along with that.
[36:43.560 --> 36:47.560]  Well, I'm not arguing whether or not he was wearing it properly. I'm just agreeing with
[36:47.560 --> 36:52.720]  how you say it's defined because that's pretty similar to how it's defined here.
[36:52.720 --> 36:54.320]  Right. I know.
[36:54.320 --> 37:00.440]  Okay. So, but the point here being that what is the distinction between not wearing and
[37:00.440 --> 37:07.440]  wearing as the law sees it? Okay. If the law specifically says that wearing means this
[37:07.440 --> 37:14.680]  way and not this way, as in not under one's arm, then not wearing is a proper connotation
[37:14.680 --> 37:16.120]  in the charge.
[37:16.120 --> 37:23.400]  Okay. It's probably, it probably, I'm going to go back and reread that with that in mind.
[37:23.400 --> 37:27.240]  But I think it does say that you're supposed to have it across your chest and not under
[37:27.240 --> 37:28.240]  your arm.
[37:28.240 --> 37:32.480]  Well, you have to specifically look to see if they defined the term wearing.
[37:32.480 --> 37:38.080]  Right. Okay. Now, what else can you help me with that?
[37:38.080 --> 37:42.120]  Well, you're...
[37:42.120 --> 37:43.120]  Go ahead.
[37:43.120 --> 37:49.760]  Oh, all right. Here's what he did. He wrote a statement on such and such a day, ticket
[37:49.760 --> 37:58.080]  number, date number, whatever. I was wearing my seat belt and I'm swearing to that and
[37:58.080 --> 38:04.920]  he took it before a notary public and he had the notary public do his thing. And the witness
[38:04.920 --> 38:10.200]  in the car did a statement similar to that. I was riding in the front seat. I saw him
[38:10.200 --> 38:14.960]  with the seat belt down properly. Yes, he was wearing it right. And I swear to that
[38:14.960 --> 38:17.200]  and here it's notarized.
[38:17.200 --> 38:25.320]  And then he's got a motion to dismiss stapled to it that says, I can't remember the exact
[38:25.320 --> 38:33.080]  wording of the motion, but motion to dismiss based on the proof of innocence with regard
[38:33.080 --> 38:35.520]  to the affidavit...
[38:35.520 --> 38:40.400]  He has something the officer does not have, a first hand fact witness. It's called best
[38:40.400 --> 38:47.280]  evidence. Under the best evidence rule, your friend will win his case because he has an
[38:47.280 --> 38:54.560]  eyewitness to corroborate his version of events and the officer has none. The officer's word
[38:54.560 --> 39:02.760]  does not trump the word of a reliable witness, a credible witness. If he does not have actual
[39:02.760 --> 39:10.560]  video or photographic proof to match up and support his allegation of improperly wearing
[39:10.560 --> 39:16.840]  the seat belt, then your friend has best evidence.
[39:16.840 --> 39:32.760]  Okay. Now I lost it. It was something I was going to ask you. Is that a good, oh, like
[39:32.760 --> 39:36.680]  you got it back or oh, isn't it painful to try to think of it now?
[39:36.680 --> 39:46.080]  I'm trying to think of this. Oh, and it was important. It was important. Boy, I'll tell
[39:46.080 --> 39:51.640]  you something. You made it sound so easy. Oh, let's see. I'm sort of getting back on
[39:51.640 --> 40:13.200]  track. What? Well, it was another, well, sorry, as we're going. So, oh, I'm almost getting
[40:13.200 --> 40:24.440]  it and I'm sorry. I think I'm having a golden moment. With regard to traffic tickets, it's
[40:24.440 --> 40:32.000]  my understanding that tell me if I'm right or wrong. With a traffic ticket, it's insufficient
[40:32.000 --> 40:36.800]  on its space for two reasons. Number one. Wait a minute. Say that again. Hold it. It
[40:36.800 --> 40:43.160]  does what for two reasons? Okay. It's insufficient on its space. It's either not a proper charging
[40:43.160 --> 40:49.320]  instrument and it's also insufficient on its space. Well, once again, that depends upon
[40:49.320 --> 40:56.400]  how the law of the particular state defines a complaint versus what is in a citation
[40:56.400 --> 41:01.640]  and whether or not there is a statute authorizing the citation to act as a complaint under a
[41:01.640 --> 41:09.520]  given set of circumstances. Now, here's the issue in 99.9 percent of the states that do
[41:09.520 --> 41:17.240]  it that way. Okay. Texas does it also. But the problem here is, is that the citation
[41:17.240 --> 41:22.320]  does not meet the requirements of an actual complaint, nor does it provide proper sufficient
[41:22.320 --> 41:26.720]  and timely notice to the individual of all the necessary elements of the offense. So,
[41:26.720 --> 41:31.640]  saying that it is something that they can enter a plea to when it fails to provide
[41:31.640 --> 41:37.840]  proper, timely and sufficient notice of all required elements of the offense is to deny
[41:37.840 --> 41:44.640]  due process to the individual by making them believe that they have been sufficiently noticed
[41:44.640 --> 41:51.200]  when in fact they have not. Well, what I was going to say was a New York state, it's my
[41:51.200 --> 41:58.200]  understanding it's the New York state constitution follows the federal constitution in that if
[41:58.200 --> 42:04.360]  you are guilty of a crime, whether it's a capital crime or a minor crime, you have to
[42:04.360 --> 42:11.080]  be noticed, you have to be given proper notice with either an information or an indictment.
[42:11.080 --> 42:16.680]  And since it's not a capital crime, they would have to do an information or a traffic violation.
[42:16.680 --> 42:22.440]  Okay. Again, that will depend upon how the law itself is written to govern the particular
[42:22.440 --> 42:28.560]  aspects of that kind of case. Here in Texas, I can make that argument because there is
[42:28.560 --> 42:34.640]  absolutely no law that says they can use a complaint. There is none. Now, there is one
[42:34.640 --> 42:41.880]  that says that if a waiver has been signed, then they can use the citation as a complaint.
[42:41.880 --> 42:48.400]  But the problem is, is that a complaint itself by law and by Texas constitution has never
[42:48.400 --> 42:54.760]  been sufficient to provide proper notice and to act as a charging instrument. They completely
[42:54.760 --> 42:59.240]  contradict themselves in different parts of the code of criminal procedure because the
[42:59.240 --> 43:06.280]  language in Chapter 15 about a complaint and the language in Chapter 45 about a complaint
[43:06.280 --> 43:12.080]  are identical in the respect that it says a complaint is an instrument charging someone
[43:12.080 --> 43:21.240]  with an offense. Now, both chapters say that. Yet in one chapter, Chapter 15, they say that
[43:21.240 --> 43:26.440]  they have to have an information with it. Even though that's what it says the complaint
[43:26.440 --> 43:31.640]  does in 15, just like it's what it says it does in 45. But then they say you don't have
[43:31.640 --> 43:36.880]  to have an information in 45 for this particular type of case. And that's both. The law does
[43:36.880 --> 43:42.440]  not support that opinion. Never has. Okay. But hang on just a second. I'll let you finish
[43:42.440 --> 43:46.520]  it up on the other side. I just wanted to clarify that for the Texas folks. All right, folks,
[43:46.520 --> 43:53.520]  y'all hang on and we'll be right back after this break to continue with this caller.
[43:53.520 --> 44:07.160]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[44:07.160 --> 44:13.520]  the affordable, easy to understand, four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours
[44:13.520 --> 44:19.400]  step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't
[44:19.400 --> 44:24.360]  have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step
[44:24.360 --> 44:31.520]  by step course. And now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22
[44:31.520 --> 44:36.920]  years of case winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what
[44:36.920 --> 44:43.240]  everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.240 --> 44:49.360]  We'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[44:49.360 --> 44:56.360]  pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[44:56.360 --> 45:07.360]  Or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ. Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com
[45:07.360 --> 45:11.940]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet
[45:11.940 --> 45:16.640]  D here in Austin, Texas, find brave new books and chase things to see all our fantastic health
[45:16.640 --> 45:21.320]  and wellness products with your very own eyes. Have a look at our miracle healing clay that
[45:21.320 --> 45:25.320]  started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a peek at some of our other wonderful
[45:25.320 --> 45:30.400]  products including our Australian emu oil, lotion handles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal
[45:30.400 --> 45:38.920]  silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's
[45:38.920 --> 45:46.400]  512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com. Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information
[45:46.400 --> 46:12.760]  on events and our product naturespureorganics.com.
[46:46.400 --> 47:03.760]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. The calling number is 512-646-1984
[47:03.760 --> 47:08.400]  and we are talking to John in New York. Alright, John, let's see if we can get this wrapped
[47:08.400 --> 47:12.760]  up and get on with our next caller here. And on the break I remembered what I was going
[47:12.760 --> 47:19.800]  to say. There's two elements. The word of an officer is automatically accepted as law.
[47:19.800 --> 47:26.360]  I have always contended that the police or the ADA for that matter never really follows
[47:26.360 --> 47:29.400]  the rules of evidence in traffic court, in traffic court.
[47:29.400 --> 47:35.600]  Well, but here's the thing. That's a presumption. The question is not whether they're actually
[47:35.600 --> 47:41.080]  following the rules of evidence as much as it is as the person who is supposed to object
[47:41.080 --> 47:46.840]  to how they're trying to get the evidence in, are you objecting properly to challenge
[47:46.840 --> 47:53.600]  their efforts to do so? Because here's the thing. The court system is an adversarial
[47:53.600 --> 48:01.240]  process, okay? As opposing parties, if one party is doing something that violates the
[48:01.240 --> 48:09.520]  rules in some way, it will be allowed to continue until the other party objects and states
[48:09.520 --> 48:15.840]  a basis for the objection to substantiate why the party being accused of something is
[48:15.840 --> 48:23.040]  not allowed to do the thing they're being accused of, okay? So it doesn't matter that
[48:23.040 --> 48:27.320]  they're trying to break the rules or nudge the rules or stretch the rules or bend the
[48:27.320 --> 48:32.160]  rules. What matters is whether or not you know enough to understand that's what they're
[48:32.160 --> 48:37.600]  doing and how to put a stop to it and why you must.
[48:37.600 --> 48:44.360]  Oh, yeah. Now here, let me continue. The rules of evidence are not being followed. They make
[48:44.360 --> 48:51.480]  an accusation and expect you to prove a negative, but the plaintiff never really has any proof.
[48:51.480 --> 48:56.800]  Yes, I saw you doing about 70 miles an hour. I checked you on the radar and you were doing
[48:56.800 --> 49:03.360]  72. And now you're expected to prove you didn't do it. Blowning. The plaintiff never proved
[49:03.360 --> 49:09.400]  anything. That's not evidence. I don't care if he had 10 boxes in the car with my...
[49:09.400 --> 49:14.560]  The testimony of the officer if it can be substantiated by a readout from the device
[49:14.560 --> 49:20.960]  is evidence. It's not law. It is evidence, however. I mean, what would you do if there
[49:20.960 --> 49:25.040]  was an eyewitness to a murder? How would you say there to introduce evidence of the murder
[49:25.040 --> 49:31.320]  if not by any means other than saying what they saw and who they saw?
[49:31.320 --> 49:36.520]  Well, so in other words, the testimony of the officer is accepted as evidence.
[49:36.520 --> 49:41.840]  Of course, an eyewitness testimony is always accepted as evidence. The question is whether
[49:41.840 --> 49:47.080]  or not that the witness can be discredited as being a reliable witness.
[49:47.080 --> 49:53.680]  Well, yeah, I sometime I'll have a conversation with you when I help someone do in traffic
[49:53.680 --> 49:58.960]  court. She had them on the ropes because I told her what to say. And the cop and the
[49:58.960 --> 50:02.760]  judge looked at each other like they were turned white because she was talking about
[50:02.760 --> 50:10.080]  the rules of evidence. And she asked the cop. She asked him if he had pictures, video testimony
[50:10.080 --> 50:13.600]  from life witnesses in the courtroom or...
[50:13.600 --> 50:20.880]  What you're asking for is does he have any substantive support for his testimony? See,
[50:20.880 --> 50:26.240]  this is where we go back to the best evidence rule I spoke about before. In the case of
[50:26.240 --> 50:33.720]  the seatbelt violation, your friend has an eyewitness who will refute the cop's testimony.
[50:33.720 --> 50:38.280]  Best evidence is in your friend's favor about the seatbelt ticket because the cop does not
[50:38.280 --> 50:45.280]  have an eyewitness to make his accounting verifiable and sustainable.
[50:45.280 --> 50:53.960]  The only way the prosecutor can win the case is to discredit your friend's friend as being
[50:53.960 --> 50:57.400]  able to testify truthfully to what's in that affidavit.
[50:57.400 --> 50:58.800]  Right, right.
[50:58.800 --> 50:59.800]  Okay?
[50:59.800 --> 51:00.800]  So...
[51:00.800 --> 51:01.800]  Okay, all right.
[51:01.800 --> 51:06.920]  That's just the way the rules of evidence work. But if they're doing something and they're
[51:06.920 --> 51:13.440]  not proving it, then you have to ask them what is their evidence of this. Are we just
[51:13.440 --> 51:17.480]  supposed to take your word that these are the facts or do you have something more substantial
[51:17.480 --> 51:20.040]  to support your version of these facts?
[51:20.040 --> 51:23.960]  That's a legitimate question to ask any witness.
[51:23.960 --> 51:29.160]  Yeah, that's my point. And when there's a doubt, it's supposed to go to the...
[51:29.160 --> 51:35.000]  Well, reasonable doubt is part of the process. If you can create that and get the conviction
[51:35.000 --> 51:41.480]  to never happen, great. But don't bank on it. The more substantive evidence you have
[51:41.480 --> 51:46.560]  to defeat what they're doing, the better off you are. Yes, you're being asked to prove
[51:46.560 --> 51:51.280]  you're innocent. But guess what? No matter what these idiots tell you, that's the way
[51:51.280 --> 51:53.040]  the system has always worked.
[51:53.040 --> 51:54.040]  Right.
[51:54.040 --> 51:59.800]  You force them to expose the fact that they don't really have any evidence. Then you introduce
[51:59.800 --> 52:05.000]  your evidence that here's why their evidence isn't really evidence and why their facts
[52:05.000 --> 52:09.520]  aren't really facts. And that's how you beat them.
[52:09.520 --> 52:14.880]  You know how I did that? I did do that. We had... It was one of my friends, her name
[52:14.880 --> 52:15.880]  is Lisa.
[52:15.880 --> 52:19.760]  Okay. Well, hang on, John. Hang on. I don't have time to go through everybody's history
[52:19.760 --> 52:22.760]  that you've helped. And I appreciate the effort that you're making on letting people know
[52:22.760 --> 52:26.480]  that you've helped and you've won or you've achieved something. Great. But the thing is,
[52:26.480 --> 52:29.800]  I've got to call her board full here, man, so I've got to get to these other folks.
[52:29.800 --> 52:36.440]  Okay. No, my point was, sometime I'll ask you if what I said to her to say at the trial
[52:36.440 --> 52:42.600]  was accurate and was I doing the right thing. Okay. Then the other thing is, just very quick,
[52:42.600 --> 52:50.000]  take it insufficient on a space because a ticket never reflects whether the driver is
[52:50.000 --> 52:55.680]  driving commercially or privately. Is that cold water?
[52:55.680 --> 52:59.680]  Most citations I've seen have a checkbox for one or the other and they almost always check
[52:59.680 --> 53:06.640]  noncommercial. But you have to remember noncommercial does not mean not commercial. Noncommercial
[53:06.640 --> 53:13.800]  is simply a different weight class than commercial. They're both commercial. They're just different
[53:13.800 --> 53:20.400]  weight classes, different passenger capacity classes, different hazardous materials classification
[53:20.400 --> 53:27.640]  types. That's it. Noncommercial is not the same as not commercial.
[53:27.640 --> 53:31.760]  All right. I'll leave it at that because I know you've got a board full of callers.
[53:31.760 --> 53:37.040]  I want to thank you very much. Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in.
[53:37.040 --> 53:41.960]  My God, keep America free. God bless you. I will okay. Do that one by myself, but thank
[53:41.960 --> 53:45.400]  you. All right. We'll talk to you later. Thanks, John.
[53:45.400 --> 53:50.200]  All right. Now we have Craig in Louisiana. Craig, what you got?
[53:50.200 --> 54:04.280]  Hey there. I got a simple one. On your donations, is it possible to, and I'm going to make
[54:04.280 --> 54:09.120]  a donation anyway, but I just want to know if I could do a monthly donation.
[54:09.120 --> 54:14.080]  Yeah. There is a way to set up on the website to make a recurring donation, yes.
[54:14.080 --> 54:21.960]  But I want to know if I could do like a layaway plan and get your seminar material.
[54:21.960 --> 54:30.440]  Well, unfortunately, that we don't have. If you want to get an email to Deborah and ask
[54:30.440 --> 54:35.240]  her if you can do cumulative payments up to the purchase of the seminar, then you can
[54:35.240 --> 54:40.040]  work that out with her. I don't have a problem with that. I can just say that you're not
[54:40.040 --> 54:45.200]  going to get the seminar until it's actually been paid for in full, because that money
[54:45.200 --> 54:49.480]  is what helps keep this network on the air. And we can't just disseminate the stuff we're
[54:49.480 --> 54:54.520]  selling without the payment. Right. Now I want to send you right now.
[54:54.520 --> 54:59.120]  Okay. Yeah. If you'll contact Deborah with an email and ask her if she can track that
[54:59.120 --> 55:04.080]  somehow for you or will help you with it or however she wants to set that up, I personally
[55:04.080 --> 55:09.720]  don't have a problem with it. But I don't see why. If you're going to do it that way,
[55:09.720 --> 55:15.440]  I'll just set you a piggy bank to one side and take $10 out of it until you have $250
[55:15.440 --> 55:21.240]  and order it. Just stick $10 a week in there or something until you're able to get it.
[55:21.240 --> 55:27.400]  However you want to do that. I just, because I want to give you all the money because y'all
[55:27.400 --> 55:30.040]  need the money every month. I'm going to do it regardless anyway.
[55:30.040 --> 55:35.040]  Okay. Well, I mean, you can get with her and see how y'all can work that out. That part
[55:35.040 --> 55:40.360]  of it I've got, I've got no hand in whatsoever. I don't deal with the receiving or transfer
[55:40.360 --> 55:44.520]  of the money or anything like that. I'm only responsible for the material that you're getting
[55:44.520 --> 55:45.520]  with it.
[55:45.520 --> 55:49.920]  Gotcha. Okay. That's all I have. Thank you. I'll take care of the rest.
[55:49.920 --> 55:51.920]  Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in.
[55:51.920 --> 55:52.920]  Okay. Bye-bye.
[55:52.920 --> 55:59.080]  Bye-bye. All right. Now we have Barrett in Arizona. Barrett, what can we do for you?
[55:59.080 --> 56:07.840]  Hi. I have a, I moved from Tucson, Arizona out here to Cortez, Colorado. This is a small
[56:07.840 --> 56:17.080]  town. It's got like 4,000 people in it. I was suspended. No, I wasn't suspended. I was
[56:17.080 --> 56:24.360]  revoked in 2009 for a DUI. I don't drink anymore at all.
[56:24.360 --> 56:35.320]  And how long were you revoked more? Ten years. Okay. So I'm almost up on that. But anyway,
[56:35.320 --> 56:42.720]  I got a really nice car that I've been, I've fixed up real nice, really nice Honda cord
[56:42.720 --> 56:48.800]  and I don't want to lose it. And I've been living here in September. It'll be a whole
[56:48.800 --> 56:55.600]  year that I've lived here in this small town. And I haven't been pulled over yet at all.
[56:55.600 --> 56:58.800]  And I'm thinking, you know, I don't want to lose my car, you know. So if I do get pulled
[56:58.800 --> 57:05.600]  over, how can I keep my car from getting towed? You're not. I'm going to tell you the only
[57:05.600 --> 57:11.960]  way on God's green earth, you're going to keep that car from being towed. Okay. Don't
[57:11.960 --> 57:24.120]  be in it. Oh, well, I mean, what if I show them case law? Don't be in it. If you deviate
[57:24.120 --> 57:33.680]  from that one piece of advice, nothing I can do for you. Don't be in it. Until you have
[57:33.680 --> 57:40.760]  case law in Colorado that says it is illegal for them to take your car or to charge you
[57:40.760 --> 57:46.400]  with an offense under their code. When you're not engaging in commerce, they are going to
[57:46.400 --> 57:54.240]  treat you as if you are every single time. And in Colorado, they can actually send you
[57:54.240 --> 58:02.840]  to jail for doing so under their law. Okay. So I shall repeat this directive one more
[58:02.840 --> 58:18.680]  time. Don't be in it. So there's no way to exercise my rates here in this state here.
[58:18.680 --> 58:23.720]  You didn't ask me that question, did you? You asked me how do I keep my car from being
[58:23.720 --> 58:38.480]  towed. I just told you. Once again, different question. You can exercise any right you want
[58:38.480 --> 58:43.640]  to, but you better be prepared to fight and know how to do it. Hang on just a second.
[58:43.640 --> 58:53.600]  We'll finish up on the other side. The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:53.600 --> 58:59.040]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations
[58:59.040 --> 59:04.800]  try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning
[59:04.800 --> 59:11.880]  of the Scripture. Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful
[59:11.880 --> 59:18.280]  and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult
[59:18.280 --> 59:24.000]  and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches
[59:24.000 --> 59:29.640]  of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give
[59:29.640 --> 59:35.080]  you a free recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study
[59:35.080 --> 59:45.320]  Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at
[59:45.320 --> 59:52.320]  freestudybible.com. That's freestudybible.com.
[59:52.320 --> 01:00:17.320]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:23.320 --> 01:00:31.880]  Markets for the 11th of April 2018 close with gold $1,353.22-nounds, silver $16.68-nounds,
[01:00:31.880 --> 01:00:44.160]  Texas crude $65.51-barrel, bitcoins at $6,902.19, ethereum at $420.80, bitcoin cash at $652.90,
[01:00:44.160 --> 01:00:59.160]  and finally litecoins at $114.34, a crypto coin. Today in history, the year 1968, President
[01:00:59.160 --> 01:01:04.400]  Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which prohibited private businesses
[01:01:04.400 --> 01:01:09.000]  from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It also
[01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:13.880]  prohibited unequal application of voter registration requirements, racial segregation in public
[01:01:13.880 --> 01:01:24.320]  schools, in employment, and public accommodations for places of business. Today in history.
[01:01:24.320 --> 01:01:28.480]  In recent news, tensions in Syria seem to reach new levels after a chemical attack on
[01:01:28.480 --> 01:01:32.640]  civilians in the city of Douma, which left 40 dead and many injured, an attack which
[01:01:32.640 --> 01:01:37.120]  is being blamed on the democratically elected President of Syria Bashar al-Assad by the
[01:01:37.120 --> 01:01:41.880]  United States and on Israel by Russia, either accusatory narrative without any verified
[01:01:41.880 --> 01:01:46.720]  evidence as of yet. President Trump tweeted today Wednesday that if, quote, Russia vows
[01:01:46.720 --> 01:01:50.800]  to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria, get ready, Russia, because they will
[01:01:50.800 --> 01:01:55.440]  be coming in nice and new and smart. Going on to warn Russia that you shouldn't be partners
[01:01:55.440 --> 01:01:59.880]  with a gas-killing animal who kills his people and enjoys it. Many in the West, including
[01:01:59.880 --> 01:02:05.000]  President Trump, have been quick to conclude that this chemical attack must have been conducted
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:10.120]  by Assad and his forces. Syria and Russia, on the other hand, have given approval since
[01:02:10.120 --> 01:02:14.400]  yesterday for the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons to investigate the sign
[01:02:14.400 --> 01:02:18.520]  of the chemical slaughter. Assad has been successful in maintaining rule and support
[01:02:18.520 --> 01:02:22.720]  during Syria's seven-year civil war, a civil war that is being fought by the government
[01:02:22.720 --> 01:02:28.200]  of Syria and anti-Assad Syrian rebels that are openly being funded by Western governments,
[01:02:28.200 --> 01:02:31.880]  with ISIS being one of the more notorious winner groups of the American-backed Syrian
[01:02:31.880 --> 01:02:37.720]  rebels. No surprise then why Russian Foreign Minister Spokeswoman Maria Zakhova posted
[01:02:37.720 --> 01:02:42.200]  on Facebook that smart missiles should be fired at terrorists and not at a legitimate
[01:02:42.200 --> 01:02:46.840]  government, which has been fighting terrorists, or is this a trick to destroy all traces with
[01:02:46.840 --> 01:02:50.840]  a smart missile strike, and then there will be no evidence for international inspectors
[01:02:50.840 --> 01:03:08.520]  to look at. This was Kirk Rody with your lowdown for April 11, 2018.
[01:03:08.520 --> 01:03:24.520]  You broke good ol' tomatoes and homemade wine, and a country boy can survive. A country
[01:03:24.520 --> 01:03:44.520]  boy can survive. All right folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. Call it number
[01:03:44.520 --> 01:03:51.400]  512-646-1984. We've got an hour left in the show. That is four segments of discussion
[01:03:51.400 --> 01:03:54.760]  that we can have. I need some more callers on the board though, because I've only got
[01:03:54.760 --> 01:03:58.040]  two right now, and I'm partway done with one of those. So let's get some more people
[01:03:58.040 --> 01:04:04.760]  calling in. All right, Barrett, let's continue. Okay, yeah, I kind of want to be like Charlie
[01:04:04.760 --> 01:04:11.080]  Sprinkle, where at least, at the very least, I don't want to lose my car. It's a real
[01:04:11.080 --> 01:04:17.400]  nice on the court. Well, I got all that. Okay, but again, Charlie Sprinkle had to do a whole
[01:04:17.400 --> 01:04:21.480]  lot of other stuff before Charlie Sprinkle did what Charlie Sprinkle did, and he had to
[01:04:21.480 --> 01:04:28.280]  learn a lot of other stuff. Okay? So this is not something you just walk up and start
[01:04:28.280 --> 01:04:33.080]  doing, especially in a state like Colorado. Having lived there for several years, I can
[01:04:33.080 --> 01:04:41.320]  tell you that from experience. Okay? Okay. So I've known that you don't have to have
[01:04:41.320 --> 01:04:46.200]  a driver's license for about 10 years. What you know and what those in the system want
[01:04:46.200 --> 01:04:52.200]  to know is two very, very different things. So don't ever confuse the two and presume
[01:04:52.200 --> 01:04:57.960]  that one trumps the other just because you're the one that knows it. We clear?
[01:04:59.960 --> 01:05:04.200]  Because no matter how this comes down, as far as your opinion of the matter goes,
[01:05:04.200 --> 01:05:12.760]  they have something you don't. They have a badge, a gun, a stick, and a radio to call
[01:05:12.760 --> 01:05:21.640]  similarly equipped and dressed individuals. Okay? Yeah. Don't ever forget that.
[01:05:23.720 --> 01:05:29.160]  Oh, I, yeah, I know it in my blood. I mean, I've been through this. Well, that's where
[01:05:29.160 --> 01:05:34.520]  you want to keep your blood is in. Okay? That's why you don't forget it.
[01:05:34.520 --> 01:05:43.320]  So like I said, until you have the cops on your side or a way to beat them black and blue with
[01:05:43.320 --> 01:05:50.680]  their own law to make it on your side, don't be in that car.
[01:05:57.800 --> 01:06:00.520]  Not unless you're going to play their game their way.
[01:06:00.520 --> 01:06:04.680]  Okay? Otherwise, you're going to run the risk of losing it, having it towed,
[01:06:04.680 --> 01:06:09.080]  having it sold because you can't pay to get it out, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:06:11.240 --> 01:06:15.960]  Let's say I want you to show a driver's license, insurance, and registered stuff to give you
[01:06:15.960 --> 01:06:22.200]  play the game their way until you are better prepared to fight what they're doing. What you
[01:06:22.200 --> 01:06:26.440]  know doesn't mean squat until you can make it hold water in a court of their law.
[01:06:26.440 --> 01:06:35.560]  Okay. How can I fortify myself? Well, I would say reading and learning will be a good start.
[01:06:37.480 --> 01:06:43.240]  Read the law. Understand the law. Audit some law classes at the universities there in Colorado.
[01:06:43.240 --> 01:06:45.560]  There's a plethora of them you can go to to do that.
[01:06:45.560 --> 01:06:56.360]  Well, they show you actual not the no, they teach law like they've always taught law. Here's what
[01:06:56.360 --> 01:07:01.800]  we want you to know, but the benefit of it is once you learn how things actually work in the
[01:07:01.800 --> 01:07:07.880]  system they've designed, you know how to go to that same university's law library and look up
[01:07:07.880 --> 01:07:17.880]  what you need to prove that they're not teaching it correctly. They're not using it correctly.
[01:07:17.880 --> 01:07:24.360]  Education is how you fix this. Not just yours, but also theirs. But you're going to have to do it by
[01:07:24.360 --> 01:07:29.480]  going through the law and going through the court in order to make it happen unless you can get a
[01:07:29.480 --> 01:07:39.000]  legislator to fix it before that happens. And I would not bank on that in Colorado ever.
[01:07:39.560 --> 01:07:42.680]  How can I get started on this quest of education?
[01:07:44.920 --> 01:07:46.760]  How did you read your first book?
[01:07:50.840 --> 01:07:53.240]  The first part of it was find the book, right?
[01:07:53.240 --> 01:08:02.280]  Yeah. Okay, there you go. Go to the law library, read the law on motor vehicles,
[01:08:02.280 --> 01:08:08.120]  read the history of it, go back as far in the official enactments of it as you can,
[01:08:08.120 --> 01:08:13.320]  do the legal research, go to a state law library. The librarians and state law libraries are
[01:08:13.320 --> 01:08:18.120]  extremely helpful and can give you more information than you can ever sort through
[01:08:18.120 --> 01:08:23.800]  until you figure out how to sort through it and then it becomes very revealing in what you're finding.
[01:08:24.520 --> 01:08:28.840]  But until you learn to understand it, it won't make any difference how much of it you find.
[01:08:29.720 --> 01:08:31.960]  How can I get some help with this? I mean...
[01:08:33.160 --> 01:08:38.520]  You're asking me to give you information that I don't know how you're going to get
[01:08:38.520 --> 01:08:44.360]  help for in Colorado any differently than you would get it anywhere else. Start with the library.
[01:08:44.360 --> 01:08:53.720]  A university library and damn near every city in Colorado has some sort of university
[01:08:53.720 --> 01:08:57.320]  within a short travel distance, if not directly in it, right?
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:01.960]  Right. Okay, find one. What about the end?
[01:09:02.600 --> 01:09:09.640]  Go to the law section in that university library. Talk to the librarians. They will get you started.
[01:09:09.640 --> 01:09:13.000]  Tell them what you're looking for. Tell them why you're looking for it.
[01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:16.600]  They will pile more books on that table than you can possibly
[01:09:16.600 --> 01:09:19.960]  manage to get through in a year, but you're going to need to try.
[01:09:20.760 --> 01:09:24.200]  What? What about the courthouse? What about the courthouse library?
[01:09:24.200 --> 01:09:27.480]  The courthouse library will have the books, but not the assistance.
[01:09:29.320 --> 01:09:34.520]  So you can get a... They won't help you at all, but the library people will.
[01:09:34.520 --> 01:09:43.800]  Their library will not be nearly as extensive as your university or state law library.
[01:09:43.800 --> 01:09:48.120]  Okay, there's no universities here in this town, but I just got to go to like Durango,
[01:09:48.120 --> 01:09:52.200]  like 50 miles from here. Well, like I said, there's usually one somewhere
[01:09:52.200 --> 01:09:58.120]  not too far distance from where you're at. You can see if they might actually have online access
[01:09:58.120 --> 01:10:03.480]  to some parts of their library. Some of them do. Well, what do you get when you get that traffic
[01:10:03.480 --> 01:10:08.600]  seminar exactly into helping... Well, you get the information as it pertains to Texas,
[01:10:08.600 --> 01:10:12.120]  and then it's your job to convert it over to the state you're in,
[01:10:12.120 --> 01:10:16.440]  which means you've got to do the legal research to match up what I'm talking about for Texas
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  in Colorado or whatever state you're in. I still have to go to the law library out here.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:26.280]  You're still going to have to do the work because I can't do it in every state.
[01:10:26.280 --> 01:10:34.680]  All right, what about, you know, obviously they're going to take me to jail for supposedly driving.
[01:10:36.280 --> 01:10:40.520]  How can I get them... What's the first thing you do when they don't take you before magistrate?
[01:10:40.520 --> 01:10:45.640]  Isn't it a lot easier to sue them for that just to...
[01:10:45.640 --> 01:10:48.920]  Well, that depends on whether or not your state has a cause of action for it.
[01:10:48.920 --> 01:10:51.560]  Texas does. I can't say whether Colorado does or not.
[01:10:52.520 --> 01:10:56.120]  How can I find out if Colorado has a cause of action for that?
[01:10:56.120 --> 01:10:58.440]  If they don't take you before... Law library.
[01:11:02.600 --> 01:11:05.800]  Okay. Here in Texas, it's called false imprisonment.
[01:11:05.800 --> 01:11:10.600]  I don't know. It could be false arrest or false imprisonment in Colorado or something else.
[01:11:12.600 --> 01:11:17.880]  But isn't it pretty much the same all the way through here in the states here that you have
[01:11:17.880 --> 01:11:23.320]  to be taken before magistrate and if they... Due process, it depends on how they treat the thing.
[01:11:23.320 --> 01:11:28.840]  For a crime, yeah, when they arrest you without a warrant, that is supposed to be the status quo.
[01:11:28.840 --> 01:11:31.720]  It's not what they actually do anywhere.
[01:11:36.120 --> 01:11:40.920]  Do you know of all the cities in the world that I have ever seen that does the process
[01:11:40.920 --> 01:11:47.400]  more or less correct to begin with? The one city in all of the U.S. you would least expect to do it,
[01:11:47.400 --> 01:11:57.720]  Chicago. Chicago actually has 24-7 courts, 24-7 public defenders, and public prosecutors.
[01:11:58.280 --> 01:12:06.120]  You ever seen the show Night Court? Yeah. Well, that's exactly how Chicago actually works
[01:12:06.120 --> 01:12:14.200]  as far as the court system goes. There is always a judge on duty, always a public defender on duty,
[01:12:14.200 --> 01:12:21.880]  and always a prosecutor on duty, because you always have that right to assistance of counsel
[01:12:22.600 --> 01:12:29.480]  whenever you're being charged with an offense. All the criminals are on duty. Pretty much.
[01:12:31.800 --> 01:12:35.480]  Anyways, yeah, I just... I was thinking it'd be... Okay, so if I found out there was
[01:12:36.840 --> 01:12:42.760]  some kind of thing where I could sue them... Well, again, you're going to have to look up
[01:12:42.760 --> 01:12:48.200]  to see what the causes of action for that in Colorado would be. Would it be to sue the city
[01:12:48.200 --> 01:12:55.320]  most likely? I mean... Did the city arrest you? Well, the cops, their cops... You're not listening
[01:12:55.320 --> 01:13:00.600]  to me. Answer the question I asked. Not what you think or what you feel. Did the city arrest you?
[01:13:02.360 --> 01:13:06.840]  No, I didn't get arrested. I'm just... You're not listening to me. You're asking questions,
[01:13:06.840 --> 01:13:10.760]  and then you're not listening to the things I'm asking you about the answer you want
[01:13:10.760 --> 01:13:16.680]  versus the one you're going to get. Did the city arrest you?
[01:13:19.080 --> 01:13:24.280]  City police. One of its employees arrested you, right?
[01:13:25.960 --> 01:13:31.800]  Right, yes. So in order to attach the city to the action against the employee as respondent
[01:13:31.800 --> 01:13:39.240]  superior, you must prove that the city was complicit in the officer's actions via the arrest.
[01:13:39.240 --> 01:13:45.480]  Okay? That's how that works. Otherwise, the city is not going to be held liable,
[01:13:46.120 --> 01:13:53.880]  except by volunteering to be so when you sue the cop. You have to show that there's a link
[01:13:53.880 --> 01:13:59.080]  between what the cop did and the policies and procedures of the city that show the city knew
[01:13:59.080 --> 01:14:05.960]  the officers were doing this and either allowed it, didn't prevent it, didn't train them for it,
[01:14:05.960 --> 01:14:11.880]  or actually have a written policy allowing it, or a policy that they violated allowing it.
[01:14:16.520 --> 01:14:19.560]  Okay? But again, that requires research on your part.
[01:14:23.560 --> 01:14:30.440]  Well, how much could I ask for a safe base? Again, I'm not your attorney. You can ask for
[01:14:30.440 --> 01:14:36.600]  whatever you want. There's no guarantee you're going to get it. Again, research will tell you
[01:14:36.600 --> 01:14:43.080]  what you should ask for and what you are most likely to get. What book would tell me that?
[01:14:43.080 --> 01:14:49.400]  How much to ask for? Like the lawsuits that you would have to read and research that actually
[01:14:49.400 --> 01:14:55.400]  one would tell you that. The jury awards would tell you that. Things like that.
[01:14:55.400 --> 01:15:06.520]  So, again, go to a law library for the case laws. Yeah. For law libraries, full of court journals and
[01:15:06.520 --> 01:15:12.920]  everything else that tells you case law. They've even got legal research, things like Lexus Nexus,
[01:15:12.920 --> 01:15:17.560]  in the law libraries that you can sit down at and look at all day long if you want to.
[01:15:18.280 --> 01:15:22.920]  Would I have to look up a law that actually, I mean, a case law that actually happened here in
[01:15:22.920 --> 01:15:29.560]  Missouri? It doesn't happen to be in Cortez, but it either has to be state, which is your state,
[01:15:29.560 --> 01:15:36.360]  or it has to be federal area covering your state or Supreme Court of the United States
[01:15:36.360 --> 01:15:41.960]  to cover your state. And it has to be on point and relevant to the specific issue you're trying
[01:15:41.960 --> 01:15:49.800]  to raise if you wanted to actually carry any weight. Okay. This is the kind of stuff that I
[01:15:49.800 --> 01:15:56.280]  told you, go find a university that teaches law and audit some of their law classes. You will learn
[01:15:56.280 --> 01:16:03.560]  how to do all this if you will do that. You think they get like a, just start taking one of their
[01:16:03.560 --> 01:16:09.000]  classes or something? I didn't. Look, you can enroll in any school you want to teaching whatever
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:16.520]  they teach. So yeah, can you? Sure. But I didn't say enroll in a class. I said audit some of their
[01:16:16.520 --> 01:16:24.920]  classes, which means just sit in and listen. I didn't know you could do that without having to be
[01:16:25.560 --> 01:16:30.600]  authorized. But as long as you're not disturbing the class, most public universities allow people
[01:16:30.600 --> 01:16:39.240]  to sit in and audit classes all day long. Okay. All right, man, my break is coming. I need to get
[01:16:39.240 --> 01:16:44.200]  you off here and get to my next caller. Okay. Thanks. All right, Barrett. Thanks for calling in.
[01:16:44.200 --> 01:16:51.480]  All right, folks, call on number 512-646-1984. Give us a call. We need somebody to talk to.
[01:16:51.480 --> 01:16:53.960]  We'll be right back. Hang on, Robert. I'll see you there.
[01:17:03.960 --> 01:17:09.800]  It's the 2018 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser and gun giveaway sponsored by
[01:17:09.800 --> 01:17:17.800]  Central Texas Gun Works. Go to logosradionetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation is a chance
[01:17:17.800 --> 01:17:25.080]  to win. From Central Texas Gun Works, the grand prize up for grabs is a Spikes Tactical AR15.
[01:17:25.720 --> 01:17:30.920]  More prizes and sponsors to be announced. When you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book,
[01:17:30.920 --> 01:17:36.920]  Legal 101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar and get
[01:17:36.920 --> 01:17:44.360]  10 chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. If you've enjoyed the shows
[01:17:44.360 --> 01:17:49.800]  on Logos Radio Network, support our fundraiser so we can keep bringing you the best quality
[01:17:49.800 --> 01:17:54.840]  programming on talk radio today. We also accept Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
[01:17:55.480 --> 01:17:59.320]  Go to logosradionetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:18:00.840 --> 01:18:05.400]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends.
[01:18:05.400 --> 01:18:10.040]  I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truths fixed. I'd be lost
[01:18:10.040 --> 01:18:15.080]  without logos. And I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to volunteer as a
[01:18:15.080 --> 01:18:19.480]  show producer, but I'm a bit of a bloodite and I really don't have any money to give because I
[01:18:19.480 --> 01:18:25.320]  spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos? Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order
[01:18:25.320 --> 01:18:30.280]  anything from Amazon, you can help logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First
[01:18:30.280 --> 01:18:37.400]  thing you do is clear your cookies. Now go to logosradionetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo
[01:18:37.400 --> 01:18:42.920]  and bookmark it. Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos get
[01:18:42.920 --> 01:18:48.920]  a few pesos. Do I pay extra? No. Do you have to do anything different when I order? No. Can I use
[01:18:48.920 --> 01:18:55.320]  my Amazon Prime? No. I mean, yes. Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This
[01:18:55.320 --> 01:19:00.920]  is perfect. Thank you so much. We are welcome. Happy holidays, logos.
[01:19:00.920 --> 01:19:08.520]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.920 --> 01:19:53.400]  All right, folks. We are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:19:54.040 --> 01:19:59.320]  FYI, we had a small glitch in the system, so if you weren't able to call in a few minutes ago,
[01:19:59.320 --> 01:20:04.840]  please try it again. We think we've got the issue corrected, so you should be able to get in if you
[01:20:04.840 --> 01:20:10.280]  haven't. In the meantime, we do have one caller that is still up on the board, and that is Robert
[01:20:10.280 --> 01:20:15.880]  in California. Robert, what can we do for you? Hi, Eddie. I don't know if you've kept up on my
[01:20:15.880 --> 01:20:24.200]  postings on Facebook and my case or not. I don't know. When I am on Facebook, I'm usually engaging
[01:20:24.200 --> 01:20:30.280]  in dozens of conversations, so I'm not sure if I am or not. Well, I posted the hearing
[01:20:30.280 --> 01:20:38.600]  meeting where the judge told me that the case was going to be sent to the DA. When the DA had
[01:20:38.600 --> 01:20:45.800]  already sent me back, the DA's packet of proof of service stating that there's no 2018 criminal
[01:20:45.800 --> 01:20:55.640]  case for me. The traffic court's alleging that it's not a criminal matter, it's a traffic matter.
[01:20:55.640 --> 01:21:02.040]  I asked the clerk, I said, where does the constitutional grant, the constitutional authority
[01:21:02.040 --> 01:21:09.320]  for traffic, she had to go get her supervisor. But the supervisor and all of them in the traffic
[01:21:09.320 --> 01:21:17.240]  court are refusing to delineate or give me evidence of a prosecuting attorney, so I can
[01:21:17.240 --> 01:21:24.440]  contact her about the case, and allegedly they're offering a deal when there was no
[01:21:24.440 --> 01:21:30.120]  fashion evidence in the first place. I'm kind of stuck when them telling me the case is still
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:36.280]  valid and going when I didn't enter a plea, the judge didn't enter a plea for me,
[01:21:36.280 --> 01:21:41.560]  and they failed the hearing. This is California, right?
[01:21:43.480 --> 01:21:47.800]  Okay, because even though they're telling you they're playing by criminal rules,
[01:21:47.800 --> 01:21:55.400]  they're not. They are playing by completely civil administrative rules. In other words,
[01:21:55.400 --> 01:22:03.400]  under administrative law, you have no rights. That law doesn't recognize rights because that
[01:22:03.400 --> 01:22:13.080]  law is entirely by agreement, okay? You have to have participated in their system and agreed to
[01:22:13.080 --> 01:22:17.800]  be bound by the rules of their system, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Hence the reason having a
[01:22:17.800 --> 01:22:24.680]  license in California is a bad idea to begin with, okay? Yeah, under private law. Under any law.
[01:22:25.880 --> 01:22:30.680]  But the fact is, that's what they're going to use to get you into that venue. Now,
[01:22:30.680 --> 01:22:36.360]  I don't know what the appeals process is in California. Whether or not you have the right
[01:22:36.360 --> 01:22:43.080]  to an appeal from this traffic court to a higher court, that's actually judicial in nature. Do you
[01:22:43.080 --> 01:22:49.000]  or don't you? I don't know. They haven't even been able to state a trial date for me yet because
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:55.400]  when the judge... Well, the thing is, is you're not going to get a trial. You're never going to get
[01:22:55.400 --> 01:23:02.920]  a trial for this in California, okay? You're going to get an administrative hearing. End of story.
[01:23:04.360 --> 01:23:10.920]  He tried to send me into the fines room as a lawful order and signed another promise to appear,
[01:23:10.920 --> 01:23:17.800]  and I declined. I refused to find another promise to appear and told him I fulfilled my promise
[01:23:17.800 --> 01:23:23.400]  to appear. There's no fact and evidence that he has three options. One to dismiss which prejudice,
[01:23:23.400 --> 01:23:27.800]  one to dismiss without prejudice, and one to find fact, mismind, not on the record.
[01:23:27.800 --> 01:23:30.280]  Did you file the interrogatories from my legal blog?
[01:23:31.560 --> 01:23:36.440]  Oh, yeah. And I haven't gotten any answers back anywhere from anywhere.
[01:23:37.240 --> 01:23:43.960]  Right. Okay. Then the first thing you need to do is file criminal complaints under whatever
[01:23:43.960 --> 01:23:49.080]  California law covers things like official oppression or misconduct in office or fraud
[01:23:49.080 --> 01:23:56.360]  or things of that nature that you can find the proper elements to fit in relation to how this
[01:23:56.360 --> 01:24:02.120]  court is conducting its business. Now, I can tell you that if you will send me an email with your
[01:24:02.120 --> 01:24:06.840]  contact information, I can send that to a friend of mine in California named Kevin Michaels.
[01:24:08.440 --> 01:24:13.000]  Now, Kevin is helping people go after him out there for this kind of stuff all the time. I
[01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:17.560]  cannot tell you if he will charge you to help you. I cannot tell you how much if he will help you.
[01:24:17.560 --> 01:24:22.920]  I can simply tell you that if there's anyone out there in the state that can make them set up
[01:24:22.920 --> 01:24:27.960]  and play properly, he's going to be one of those that can help you get it done.
[01:24:34.520 --> 01:24:37.560]  I just had my friend go on by trying to get my attention on doing something else.
[01:24:37.560 --> 01:24:51.160]  Yeah, there's no case that they want me to go into court. I've had a cross complaint
[01:24:51.160 --> 01:24:57.240]  in action and the judge said I have, that he assumes I haven't been to law school and I've
[01:24:57.240 --> 01:25:03.640]  got that again. So, I mean, by him saying that, he's admitting that I have a case.
[01:25:03.640 --> 01:25:08.600]  Yeah, well, he's also admitting that he probably hasn't either.
[01:25:08.600 --> 01:25:34.760]  Okay, well, can't go on like that. Robert, when you get the line clear on this, then let me know.
[01:25:34.760 --> 01:25:38.280]  I'll come back to you here shortly. Just hang on and we'll wrap this up when you're not dealing
[01:25:38.280 --> 01:25:43.080]  with that individual right there. Okay. In the meantime, let's get to Charles in Texas. Charles.
[01:25:45.240 --> 01:25:48.840]  Hey, Eddie. How are you doing, sir? All right, and you?
[01:25:50.600 --> 01:25:56.360]  I'm doing good. That's what it looks like to you. It's just a tough one. Get off your rear end and
[01:25:56.360 --> 01:26:00.920]  get there. You know that thing you can't leave. You can leave the horse to work, but you can't
[01:26:00.920 --> 01:26:05.480]  make them drink because I think some of them are just too stupid to drink the water.
[01:26:05.480 --> 01:26:11.960]  I use your program. I help my friends when it's available, like with the red letter
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:23.960]  that you have. You cannot make changes in our lives, or you can do a show us a direction.
[01:26:25.240 --> 01:26:31.480]  I have been using you for a while. I help my friends as it comes up whenever I'm able to,
[01:26:31.480 --> 01:26:38.920]  using what you taught me. People get off of your rear. You're fired. You need to make a change
[01:26:39.560 --> 01:26:47.400]  and do it now. Eddie cannot do all our stuff for us. He's done his part. Now, it's kind of for us
[01:26:47.400 --> 01:26:53.480]  to do our, and I'm sorry I'm not trying to be ugly, but you know what? Some people just need
[01:26:53.480 --> 01:27:00.760]  a kick in the rear. Yeah, I have a saying there. There are people that need a high five in the
[01:27:00.760 --> 01:27:08.600]  forehead with a three-pound ball peen hammer. Yeah, but I don't want to go jail either, so
[01:27:09.480 --> 01:27:14.520]  I'm going to just kick him in the rear, but I won't let you go because I know that people
[01:27:14.520 --> 01:27:18.760]  need you for advice. All right, Charles. Well, thanks for calling in, man. I appreciate the support.
[01:27:20.040 --> 01:27:22.760]  You're always welcome, man. Talk to you later. All right. Take care.
[01:27:22.760 --> 01:27:29.240]  All right. Let's check back real quickly. Robert, are you free to talk now?
[01:27:30.760 --> 01:27:36.360]  Yeah, I had to go get these sandal on. He's accusing me of acting like I'm homeless when I want to
[01:27:36.360 --> 01:27:42.680]  walk around barefoot. Okay. Well, in any case, like I say, if you will send me a contact email
[01:27:42.680 --> 01:27:47.960]  with all of your contact information in it, I will get that over to Kevin and y'all can hook up and
[01:27:47.960 --> 01:27:52.440]  see what he can tell you or help you with or whatever and work that out between you, okay?
[01:27:52.440 --> 01:27:57.080]  Because he can give you more direct information on this process in California than I can.
[01:27:57.080 --> 01:28:04.200]  I can tell you what it's mostly about. I can tell you how to study up and look at what they're doing,
[01:28:04.200 --> 01:28:09.080]  but the fact is they're not playing by any of the rules that are written down. I already know this
[01:28:09.080 --> 01:28:14.520]  for a fact, so anything I tell you while accurate under the law is not going to be accurate in
[01:28:14.520 --> 01:28:19.720]  telling you how to cope with them because they're not playing by those rules. They're making them
[01:28:19.720 --> 01:28:26.920]  up as they go along, okay? Kevin could show you exactly how to use that to better yourself
[01:28:26.920 --> 01:28:34.200]  while making them pay. Yeah, and if you get a chance, look on Facebook for, well, I made a
[01:28:34.200 --> 01:28:39.480]  YouTube one of the rain, the attempt to rain me. I'll send you a copy of it if you want and maybe
[01:28:39.480 --> 01:28:45.160]  you get a chance. It's only like two or three minutes. Okay. Well, if you will tag me in a link
[01:28:45.160 --> 01:28:51.160]  to it. Yeah, if you'll tag me in the post for it, I'll find it. Yeah, I'm never great at public
[01:28:51.160 --> 01:28:55.000]  speaking it, but I'm better than I was when I first started out. Well, most people have to get
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:29:02.120]  that way or lose badly constantly. No, I gotta stop. I gotta learn how to stop stuttering.
[01:29:03.400 --> 01:29:09.080]  Well, stop being nervous with it. Just imagine most of them are dumber than you could ever be,
[01:29:09.080 --> 01:29:15.560]  even if you were dumb, because they're operating entirely on beliefs and presumptions rather than
[01:29:15.560 --> 01:29:21.800]  facts and law. That makes them stupid. And they're a personal opinion. Right. And that's where knowing
[01:29:21.800 --> 01:29:28.200]  what the law says can allow you to destroy their personal opinion and those presumptions and make
[01:29:28.200 --> 01:29:35.880]  them regret standing on them. That's the key to all of it. Okay. It all started out when they
[01:29:35.880 --> 01:29:43.640]  wanted to attempt to trespass in the RV, Stevy Honeybee. Well, Robert, I got a break coming up
[01:29:43.640 --> 01:29:47.880]  here, man. You hear the music? I got a break coming. Anyway, give me that information and I'll
[01:29:47.880 --> 01:29:54.600]  get it to Kevin. Okay. All right. All right, folks will be right back after the break. Y'all hang on.
[01:29:54.600 --> 01:30:08.360]  In Wisconsin, an elderly woman who housed orphans was about to lose her home before closure,
[01:30:08.360 --> 01:30:13.960]  when her 12 year old grandson came to the rescue. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. Back with the story
[01:30:13.960 --> 01:30:20.760]  of Noah the Dreamcatcher after this. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself,
[01:30:20.760 --> 01:30:25.640]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms
[01:30:25.640 --> 01:30:31.800]  will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information
[01:30:31.800 --> 01:30:38.360]  to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:38.360 --> 01:30:44.440]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:44.440 --> 01:30:52.280]  For years, Janice Sparhawk cared for dozens of orphans. Many dropped on her doorstep after dark,
[01:30:52.280 --> 01:30:58.040]  but at 72, she was in trouble. Her health failing, she couldn't pay the mortgage unless she found
[01:30:58.040 --> 01:31:04.040]  $10,000 the bank would foreclose. She appealed to her congressman, her governor and even the
[01:31:04.040 --> 01:31:09.320]  president, but it was her grandson, Noah, who saved the day. The 12 year old posted her story
[01:31:09.320 --> 01:31:15.640]  on a website he created three years earlier, Noah's Dreamcatcher Network, to help hurricane victims.
[01:31:15.640 --> 01:31:22.120]  Within days, enough money had poured in to rescue Sparhawk, her foster kids and their faith in America.
[01:31:22.120 --> 01:31:26.840]  I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.720 --> 01:31:34.760]  I lost my son. My uncle, my uncle. My uncle. My uncle. My uncle. My uncle. My uncle. My uncle. My uncle.
[01:31:34.760 --> 01:31:40.080]  November 11th, 2000. Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th.
[01:31:40.080 --> 01:31:44.280]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:44.280 --> 01:31:50.160]  Although the official explanation is that fire brought down Building 7, over 1,200 architects
[01:31:50.160 --> 01:31:53.920]  and engineers have looked into the evidence and believed there is more to the story.
[01:31:53.920 --> 01:31:57.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:01.960]  Go to building what.org. Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:01.960 --> 01:32:07.400]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:07.400 --> 01:32:12.120]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:12.120 --> 01:32:15.640]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.640 --> 01:32:22.200]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:22.200 --> 01:32:27.880]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.880 --> 01:32:33.240]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:33.240 --> 01:32:39.720]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.720 --> 01:32:46.680]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.680 --> 01:32:51.720]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:51.720 --> 01:32:57.880]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.880 --> 01:33:23.880]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:27.880 --> 01:33:45.880]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984, and we have Adam in Texas.
[01:33:45.880 --> 01:33:47.880]  Adam, what can we do for you?
[01:33:47.880 --> 01:33:49.880]  Hey Eddie, how you doing?
[01:33:49.880 --> 01:33:51.880]  Doing alright.
[01:33:51.880 --> 01:34:05.880]  Well, back in May, late May I sent a public information request to the municipality asking for a copy of the citation and charging instrument.
[01:34:05.880 --> 01:34:11.880]  They sent me a little letter by saying that they won't give it to me because that was a judicial record.
[01:34:11.880 --> 01:34:21.880]  And so then on June 11th, I sent them, it was actually one of the years off your seminar, it was a demand for public information.
[01:34:21.880 --> 01:34:35.880]  I sent June 11th, it arrived on a Saturday, June 16th, and it's been over 30 days now, and I have not got my green card back.
[01:34:35.880 --> 01:34:38.880]  I haven't gotten the letter back or anything.
[01:34:38.880 --> 01:34:41.880]  Can I have the post office trace it?
[01:34:41.880 --> 01:34:53.880]  Yeah, I keep, I've gone in there four times and they can't find it, and they told me it'll just eventually come back to me and that they said a business doesn't have to accept a certified mail.
[01:34:53.880 --> 01:35:13.880]  The way the problem is that the court is not a business, so if they got, if it arrives on a Saturday and the postman left them a notice telling them that they have certified mail to come pick up at the, you know, post office or whatever, do they have a certain time frame that they have to come get it?
[01:35:13.880 --> 01:35:21.880]  Well, normally the clerk will pick it up with any other mail that they've got to sign for, which there's going to be multiple pieces like that.
[01:35:21.880 --> 01:35:25.880]  So why the thing would be that way, I couldn't tell you.
[01:35:25.880 --> 01:35:36.880]  As far as time, it just depends upon how they've got their pickup scheduled for when they go down to the post office and get the stuff they have to sign for, because there'll be things from time to time that they do have to sign for.
[01:35:36.880 --> 01:35:42.880]  But I don't know what their schedule is, so I don't know what kind of time frame we're talking about.
[01:35:42.880 --> 01:35:45.880]  They can arrange that however they need to.
[01:35:45.880 --> 01:35:51.880]  But the issue here becomes what they told you about those records being judicial records.
[01:35:51.880 --> 01:35:56.880]  Who did you send the information request to on the first one?
[01:35:56.880 --> 01:35:59.880]  The municipal court.
[01:35:59.880 --> 01:36:00.880]  Okay.
[01:36:00.880 --> 01:36:02.880]  Those are not judicial records.
[01:36:02.880 --> 01:36:12.880]  The Public Information Act specifically says that the adjudicatory records of a court are not judicial records.
[01:36:12.880 --> 01:36:16.880]  They're absolutely not, and they know this.
[01:36:16.880 --> 01:36:17.880]  Right.
[01:36:17.880 --> 01:36:28.880]  So what you should have done is immediately file a criminal complaint with the Attorney General's office, because they are not allowed to tell you they're not going to respond.
[01:36:28.880 --> 01:36:36.880]  If they don't want to turn them over, they are required by law to get an AG opinion saying that they don't have to turn them over.
[01:36:36.880 --> 01:36:41.880]  They are not allowed to make that decision themselves.
[01:36:41.880 --> 01:36:44.880]  Did they do that?
[01:36:44.880 --> 01:36:50.880]  Well, they wrote the short letter back on one really nice piece of paper, I guess they did.
[01:36:50.880 --> 01:36:59.880]  Yeah, but my question is, is did they send you a notice that they were requesting an opinion from the Attorney General's office about whether or not they had to respond?
[01:36:59.880 --> 01:37:00.880]  No.
[01:37:00.880 --> 01:37:01.880]  Okay.
[01:37:01.880 --> 01:37:07.880]  Then they committed a crime under 552.353 of the Public Information Act.
[01:37:07.880 --> 01:37:10.880]  They committed a crime.
[01:37:10.880 --> 01:37:12.880]  552. what?
[01:37:12.880 --> 01:37:15.880]  552.353.
[01:37:15.880 --> 01:37:16.880]  353.
[01:37:16.880 --> 01:37:18.880]  Yeah.
[01:37:18.880 --> 01:37:19.880]  Okay.
[01:37:19.880 --> 01:37:20.880]  Continue.
[01:37:20.880 --> 01:37:21.880]  All right.
[01:37:21.880 --> 01:37:27.880]  So you need to file a criminal complaint against whoever's name is on that letter, and I hope it's the judges.
[01:37:27.880 --> 01:37:30.880]  No, it's the court administrator.
[01:37:30.880 --> 01:37:34.880]  Who did you address, the PIR-2?
[01:37:34.880 --> 01:37:36.880]  Uh, the municipal court.
[01:37:36.880 --> 01:37:37.880]  So I guess it went to the court.
[01:37:37.880 --> 01:37:38.880]  No, wait a minute.
[01:37:38.880 --> 01:37:39.880]  Wait a minute.
[01:37:39.880 --> 01:37:40.880]  Not what?
[01:37:40.880 --> 01:37:45.880]  Who did you direct the PIR-2?
[01:37:45.880 --> 01:37:47.880]  The municipal court.
[01:37:47.880 --> 01:37:48.880]  Okay.
[01:37:48.880 --> 01:37:51.880]  The municipal court is not the custodian of record.
[01:37:51.880 --> 01:37:52.880]  It's a place.
[01:37:52.880 --> 01:37:53.880]  It's a building.
[01:37:53.880 --> 01:37:58.880]  It's a repository in and of itself, but it is not the custodian of record.
[01:37:58.880 --> 01:37:59.880]  Okay.
[01:37:59.880 --> 01:38:00.880]  Okay.
[01:38:00.880 --> 01:38:08.880]  Who in the municipal court is the official custodian of all records of any kind in that court?
[01:38:08.880 --> 01:38:11.880]  Well, the person who answered me was the court administrator.
[01:38:11.880 --> 01:38:12.880]  Not my question.
[01:38:12.880 --> 01:38:17.880]  Who is the official custodian of record?
[01:38:17.880 --> 01:38:18.880]  The court clerk.
[01:38:18.880 --> 01:38:19.880]  No.
[01:38:19.880 --> 01:38:21.880]  The judge is.
[01:38:21.880 --> 01:38:23.880]  Oh, okay.
[01:38:23.880 --> 01:38:34.880]  You must address your PIR-2, the custodian of record, i.e. the judge presiding over said court.
[01:38:34.880 --> 01:38:35.880]  Okay.
[01:38:35.880 --> 01:38:37.880]  Well, it did say the custodian of the record.
[01:38:37.880 --> 01:38:38.880]  Yeah.
[01:38:38.880 --> 01:38:41.880]  So it just, it didn't specify the judge, but it said dear.
[01:38:41.880 --> 01:38:42.880]  Yeah.
[01:38:42.880 --> 01:38:47.880]  Unfortunately, the Texas case law on it says you've got to direct it specifically to the
[01:38:47.880 --> 01:38:50.880]  judge, not simply the custodian of record.
[01:38:50.880 --> 01:38:55.880]  If, for instance, you send it to another agency, you can't just say custodian of record.
[01:38:55.880 --> 01:38:57.880]  You actually have to use their title.
[01:38:57.880 --> 01:39:02.880]  It's a bogus way to interpret the Public Information Act, but that's how the courts have set it
[01:39:02.880 --> 01:39:09.880]  up to protect the public officials who don't do their job properly.
[01:39:09.880 --> 01:39:10.880]  Okay.
[01:39:10.880 --> 01:39:16.880]  Well, I did file criminal charges on the judge with two Harris County just of the pieces
[01:39:16.880 --> 01:39:19.880]  and the mayor of the city.
[01:39:19.880 --> 01:39:23.880]  In relation to the Public Information Act or for something else?
[01:39:23.880 --> 01:39:25.880]  In relation to Public Information Act.
[01:39:25.880 --> 01:39:29.880]  They have no authority to do anything under the Public Information Act.
[01:39:29.880 --> 01:39:36.880]  The Attorney General has given sole exclusive authority to enforce the Public Information Act.
[01:39:36.880 --> 01:39:37.880]  Okay.
[01:39:37.880 --> 01:39:41.880]  So I'm going to file a criminal complaint with the Attorney General for a violation of
[01:39:41.880 --> 01:39:42.880]  the Public Information Act.
[01:39:42.880 --> 01:39:43.880]  Correct.
[01:39:43.880 --> 01:39:47.880]  And you're going to supply a copy of that letter showing and stating that they never requested
[01:39:47.880 --> 01:39:49.880]  an Attorney General opinion.
[01:39:49.880 --> 01:39:55.880]  You asked it for a copy of information contained in the adjudicatory file under 552.
[01:39:55.880 --> 01:40:01.880]  Up in the definitions section is specifically defines what records are considered public
[01:40:01.880 --> 01:40:02.880]  information.
[01:40:02.880 --> 01:40:06.880]  And it clearly says the adjudicatory records of a court.
[01:40:06.880 --> 01:40:07.880]  Okay.
[01:40:07.880 --> 01:40:13.880]  So go to that section of the Public Information Act and make sure you reference it in your
[01:40:13.880 --> 01:40:16.880]  criminal complaint to the Attorney General's office.
[01:40:16.880 --> 01:40:21.880]  Saying right here, the specifics of the information I'm asking for are contained in the adjudicatory
[01:40:21.880 --> 01:40:26.880]  record which is defined as public information that they must turn over.
[01:40:26.880 --> 01:40:29.880]  I want somebody's head on a platter.
[01:40:29.880 --> 01:40:32.880]  Namely the judge because he's the one responsible.
[01:40:32.880 --> 01:40:33.880]  Okay.
[01:40:33.880 --> 01:40:37.880]  Now should I do all that after I rescind it specifically?
[01:40:37.880 --> 01:40:38.880]  No.
[01:40:38.880 --> 01:40:39.880]  The judge?
[01:40:39.880 --> 01:40:40.880]  No.
[01:40:40.880 --> 01:40:44.880]  Let them try to say you didn't ask for from the right source.
[01:40:44.880 --> 01:40:47.880]  Right now just go forward.
[01:40:47.880 --> 01:40:48.880]  Okay.
[01:40:48.880 --> 01:40:49.880]  Go straight to the AG.
[01:40:49.880 --> 01:40:50.880]  Okay.
[01:40:50.880 --> 01:40:55.880]  What about my criminal complaint on the judge, municipal judge that I sent to the mayor and
[01:40:55.880 --> 01:40:56.880]  the two JPs?
[01:40:56.880 --> 01:40:58.880]  They're not going to do anything with them.
[01:40:58.880 --> 01:41:01.880]  They don't have any jurisdiction to do anything with them.
[01:41:01.880 --> 01:41:02.880]  Okay.
[01:41:02.880 --> 01:41:03.880]  So I can follow up.
[01:41:03.880 --> 01:41:05.880]  I just told you that.
[01:41:05.880 --> 01:41:06.880]  Okay.
[01:41:06.880 --> 01:41:08.880]  Follow up with them on the sticky ball.
[01:41:08.880 --> 01:41:09.880]  Okay.
[01:41:09.880 --> 01:41:11.880]  All right.
[01:41:11.880 --> 01:41:16.880]  Well, the only thing you can go to them with a criminal complaint about is if the basis
[01:41:16.880 --> 01:41:22.880]  that judge is doing by not providing you, alleges some other criminal conduct such as abuse
[01:41:22.880 --> 01:41:26.880]  of official capacity, official oppression, something of that nature.
[01:41:26.880 --> 01:41:29.880]  Those complaints you could file with them and have them act upon.
[01:41:29.880 --> 01:41:32.880]  Well, that was the nature of the criminal accusations was.
[01:41:32.880 --> 01:41:33.880]  Well, make up your mind.
[01:41:33.880 --> 01:41:35.880]  I just asked you what they were for.
[01:41:35.880 --> 01:41:37.880]  You got to give me straight stuff here.
[01:41:37.880 --> 01:41:41.880]  You're making inferences that I can't interpret it from my end.
[01:41:41.880 --> 01:41:43.880]  I filed the criminal charges.
[01:41:43.880 --> 01:41:45.880]  What were the charges?
[01:41:45.880 --> 01:41:47.880]  Official oppression.
[01:41:47.880 --> 01:41:52.880]  Official oppression, 3903 because he failed to give me, he denied me access to the public
[01:41:52.880 --> 01:41:53.880]  court records.
[01:41:53.880 --> 01:41:54.880]  Okay.
[01:41:54.880 --> 01:41:56.880]  Again, that's a public information act.
[01:41:56.880 --> 01:42:03.880]  He's not officially oppressing you until he has harmed you in some way by that denial.
[01:42:03.880 --> 01:42:07.880]  And you have to be able to prove that harm.
[01:42:07.880 --> 01:42:13.880]  That's why you have to take that allegation to the AG, not to the local.
[01:42:13.880 --> 01:42:14.880]  Okay.
[01:42:14.880 --> 01:42:15.880]  All right.
[01:42:15.880 --> 01:42:16.880]  Well, no harm no foul, I guess.
[01:42:16.880 --> 01:42:20.880]  Yeah, I'll go straight to the AG with the criminal complaint against him for sure.
[01:42:20.880 --> 01:42:21.880]  Okay.
[01:42:21.880 --> 01:42:28.880]  Now, in addition to that, you need to file a written motion for discovery asking for
[01:42:28.880 --> 01:42:31.880]  those same things you asked for in the PIR.
[01:42:31.880 --> 01:42:33.880]  Yeah, of course.
[01:42:33.880 --> 01:42:38.880]  Yeah, I was going to do most of the discovery after I met Jack with him with all this PIR stuff.
[01:42:38.880 --> 01:42:43.880]  Well, while wait, get your ducks in a row and file them both.
[01:42:43.880 --> 01:42:44.880]  Okay.
[01:42:44.880 --> 01:42:45.880]  Yeah, yeah.
[01:42:45.880 --> 01:42:46.880]  Well, I did the PIR.
[01:42:46.880 --> 01:42:49.880]  Yeah, I was getting ready to do the motion for discovery.
[01:42:49.880 --> 01:42:52.880]  Then they have to give it to me, I guess.
[01:42:52.880 --> 01:42:53.880]  Okay.
[01:42:53.880 --> 01:42:56.880]  Well, I was just wondering about the certified mail.
[01:42:56.880 --> 01:42:59.880]  I mean, they can't just leave it at the post office forever, don't they?
[01:42:59.880 --> 01:43:01.880]  Isn't there some rule they got to go through?
[01:43:01.880 --> 01:43:02.880]  Well, that's not true.
[01:43:02.880 --> 01:43:03.880]  They could.
[01:43:03.880 --> 01:43:07.880]  But the question is, is who is targeting you versus the other mail?
[01:43:07.880 --> 01:43:11.880]  Because guaranteed you're not the only one sending the mail they have to sign for.
[01:43:11.880 --> 01:43:16.880]  So who's mail are they picking up and who's mail are they rejecting by not picking it up?
[01:43:16.880 --> 01:43:19.880]  And then how can you prove that's what's happening?
[01:43:19.880 --> 01:43:25.880]  Because if you can do that, then you can prove that they're denying people access to the courts
[01:43:25.880 --> 01:43:31.880]  by refusing to pick up mail that's sent to the court for specific purposes.
[01:43:31.880 --> 01:43:32.880]  Okay.
[01:43:32.880 --> 01:43:37.880]  But you're going to have to be able to prove it, not just a legend.
[01:43:37.880 --> 01:43:39.880]  Okay.
[01:43:39.880 --> 01:43:41.880]  All right, Eddie, thanks a lot, man.
[01:43:41.880 --> 01:43:42.880]  Yes, sir.
[01:43:42.880 --> 01:43:43.880]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:43:43.880 --> 01:43:44.880]  All right.
[01:43:44.880 --> 01:43:48.880]  Kevin, Carlos, y'all hang on, and I'll pick y'all up on the other side for the last segment.
[01:43:48.880 --> 01:43:49.880]  Y'all hang on, folks.
[01:43:49.880 --> 01:44:18.880]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:19.880 --> 01:44:45.880]  Thank you.
[01:44:45.880 --> 01:45:11.880]  Thank you.
[01:45:11.880 --> 01:45:37.880]  Thank you.
[01:45:37.880 --> 01:46:03.880]  Thank you.
[01:46:03.880 --> 01:46:18.880]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:46:18.880 --> 01:46:20.880]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:20.880 --> 01:46:24.880]  We are down to the last segment of the show and our last two callers on the board.
[01:46:24.880 --> 01:46:26.880]  Kevin in Texas, we'll start with you.
[01:46:26.880 --> 01:46:28.880]  Kevin, what do you got?
[01:46:28.880 --> 01:46:30.880]  Hey, Eddie.
[01:46:30.880 --> 01:46:33.880]  I'm trying to kind of jump right into it.
[01:46:33.880 --> 01:46:38.880]  Since I retired, I've kind of made it my mission that any time any of the forms of government
[01:46:38.880 --> 01:46:44.880]  contact me or can tell me to form in any way, I'm going to check their lawful ability to
[01:46:44.880 --> 01:46:45.880]  do it.
[01:46:45.880 --> 01:46:46.880]  Right.
[01:46:46.880 --> 01:46:51.880]  And it started working for me, but I'm going to have some questions on some things on this.
[01:46:51.880 --> 01:46:54.880]  My big one that I've gotten into now is the jury system.
[01:46:54.880 --> 01:46:55.880]  Uh-huh.
[01:46:55.880 --> 01:46:59.880]  I received an official jury notification from the district clerk.
[01:46:59.880 --> 01:47:00.880]  Okay.
[01:47:00.880 --> 01:47:03.880]  And it compels you to answer a questionnaire.
[01:47:03.880 --> 01:47:08.880]  If you don't answer the questionnaire over the 10 days, you will be summoned to court
[01:47:08.880 --> 01:47:12.880]  with a visit to your door, but in handcuffs and taken to court.
[01:47:12.880 --> 01:47:14.880]  That was their explanation.
[01:47:14.880 --> 01:47:16.880]  So I looked it up.
[01:47:16.880 --> 01:47:17.880]  Okay.
[01:47:17.880 --> 01:47:19.880]  And there's no such thing.
[01:47:19.880 --> 01:47:22.880]  They're simulating a legal process.
[01:47:22.880 --> 01:47:26.880]  The only way they can get you to fill out the questionnaire is with the accompanying a
[01:47:26.880 --> 01:47:30.880]  gun, because if they try to come and arrest you and take you to court without ever summoning
[01:47:30.880 --> 01:47:35.880]  you and you're violating that summon, they have no legal standing to do that.
[01:47:35.880 --> 01:47:36.880]  Right.
[01:47:36.880 --> 01:47:41.880]  So I'm looking for, and other than, you know, when they show up at your door with a gun.
[01:47:41.880 --> 01:47:44.880]  What level court sent you this notice?
[01:47:44.880 --> 01:47:47.880]  Um, well, it's in Johnson County.
[01:47:47.880 --> 01:47:49.880]  It's the district clerk.
[01:47:49.880 --> 01:47:50.880]  Okay.
[01:47:50.880 --> 01:47:54.880]  So it's going to be a district court they're summoning you into.
[01:47:54.880 --> 01:47:55.880]  Excuse me?
[01:47:55.880 --> 01:47:58.880]  It's going to be a district court they're summoning you into.
[01:47:58.880 --> 01:47:59.880]  Yeah.
[01:47:59.880 --> 01:48:03.880]  And then we will be selected for anything all the way down to the music court.
[01:48:03.880 --> 01:48:04.880]  Okay.
[01:48:04.880 --> 01:48:06.880]  Uh, then here's the thing.
[01:48:06.880 --> 01:48:13.880]  I would file an actual complaint with the Texas Supreme Court against that district court
[01:48:13.880 --> 01:48:19.880]  and its clerk for violations of law relating to the duties of their office by sending out
[01:48:19.880 --> 01:48:27.880]  a questionnaire demanding information without it accompanying a summons to appear for jury duty
[01:48:27.880 --> 01:48:29.880]  as is required by law.
[01:48:29.880 --> 01:48:34.880]  Now the other question here is where is the authority in the law for the questionnaire?
[01:48:34.880 --> 01:48:38.880]  What specifically does the law allow them to ask?
[01:48:38.880 --> 01:48:42.880]  Does it say why they're allowed to ask it?
[01:48:42.880 --> 01:48:49.880]  And how does it affect your ability to serve as a juror based upon what's in it?
[01:48:49.880 --> 01:48:56.880]  Yeah, I researched that and there is an official questionnaire formed by their overseeing body
[01:48:56.880 --> 01:49:01.880]  and the official questionnaire has questions pertaining to your eligibility,
[01:49:01.880 --> 01:49:07.880]  questions on whether you need to serve at a, you know, possibly serve at a different time
[01:49:07.880 --> 01:49:09.880]  for exemptions and other things.
[01:49:09.880 --> 01:49:14.880]  But the questionnaire they have for you to sign online, they've added like three extra questions
[01:49:14.880 --> 01:49:17.880]  that are, I can see no reason for it.
[01:49:17.880 --> 01:49:21.880]  They want to know if you have anybody in your family that's in law enforcement.
[01:49:21.880 --> 01:49:25.880]  They want to know, they're kind of like questions that should be more dire questions.
[01:49:25.880 --> 01:49:26.880]  Right.
[01:49:26.880 --> 01:49:32.880]  But they appear to be pre-vore-diaring you with those questions, which would be illegal.
[01:49:32.880 --> 01:49:37.880]  Yeah, because that's the clerk acting on behalf of the prosecution or the other party
[01:49:37.880 --> 01:49:41.880]  for whatever reason and it authorized to do it by law.
[01:49:41.880 --> 01:49:46.880]  So is the questionnaire they're telling you to fill out one they say you have to go online to fill out?
[01:49:46.880 --> 01:49:54.880]  Well, there's a special section of the code, 620111, that allows for electronically filling it out.
[01:49:54.880 --> 01:50:02.880]  But it still states, even the very beginning of that, it says a plan authorized under this section, 62011,
[01:50:02.880 --> 01:50:08.880]  for the selection of names of prospective jurors may allow for the prospective juror to appear
[01:50:08.880 --> 01:50:12.880]  in response to a summons by, and then it says electronic deals.
[01:50:12.880 --> 01:50:17.880]  But it even states there, it must be in response to a summons.
[01:50:17.880 --> 01:50:18.880]  Okay.
[01:50:18.880 --> 01:50:26.880]  And the original code that it picks all this up from is 620132.
[01:50:26.880 --> 01:50:32.880]  That's the original code that spells out all the legalities of a written summons and it states,
[01:50:32.880 --> 01:50:38.880]  a questionnaire must accompany a summons and a summons must be accompanied by a questionnaire.
[01:50:38.880 --> 01:50:39.880]  So they're tied together.
[01:50:39.880 --> 01:50:40.880]  Right.
[01:50:40.880 --> 01:50:41.880]  Okay.
[01:50:41.880 --> 01:50:47.880]  All the requisites for a summons right now are under Chapter 23 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:50:47.880 --> 01:50:52.880]  Unless they've got a different set in civil procedure for civil cases.
[01:50:52.880 --> 01:50:55.880]  Well, that's just for the summoning process.
[01:50:55.880 --> 01:50:56.880]  Right.
[01:50:56.880 --> 01:51:00.880]  This what I'm talking about is specifically for jury summons.
[01:51:00.880 --> 01:51:01.880]  Okay.
[01:51:01.880 --> 01:51:08.880]  In that particular case, like I say, I would file a complaint with the Texas Supreme Court against that district court.
[01:51:08.880 --> 01:51:12.880]  One, for adding additional questions not authorized by law.
[01:51:12.880 --> 01:51:18.880]  And two, for failing to properly accompany the questionnaire with a proper summons.
[01:51:18.880 --> 01:51:23.880]  You wouldn't just go ahead and file a criminal complaint against them in that county?
[01:51:23.880 --> 01:51:27.880]  What crime does it say they're committing when they fail to do that?
[01:51:27.880 --> 01:51:29.880]  Class A misdemeanor.
[01:51:29.880 --> 01:51:30.880]  It says that.
[01:51:30.880 --> 01:51:34.880]  The statute specifically says it's a class A misdemeanor to not do this?
[01:51:34.880 --> 01:51:37.880]  Well, if you, it doesn't say that.
[01:51:37.880 --> 01:51:38.880]  I don't know how to explain it.
[01:51:38.880 --> 01:51:46.880]  But like the only law that I know of that you could take them with would be stimulating legal process.
[01:51:46.880 --> 01:51:50.880]  And in that law, it explains that if you do anything.
[01:51:50.880 --> 01:52:05.880]  Well, if you can make the argument that the questionnaire is a legal process, which presumably it could be because it's requiring you to answer legal questions for legal purposes for governmental activity.
[01:52:05.880 --> 01:52:07.880]  That argument could be made.
[01:52:07.880 --> 01:52:09.880]  Then.
[01:52:09.880 --> 01:52:11.880]  Well, the legal process.
[01:52:11.880 --> 01:52:17.880]  Oh, and does it contain, does the written one contain those three questions, three additional questions?
[01:52:17.880 --> 01:52:18.880]  No, it does not.
[01:52:18.880 --> 01:52:20.880]  Only the one online does.
[01:52:20.880 --> 01:52:21.880]  Right.
[01:52:21.880 --> 01:52:22.880]  Okay.
[01:52:22.880 --> 01:52:31.880]  Then simulation of legal process you might not be able to do because they're not simulating it if it is proper.
[01:52:31.880 --> 01:52:37.880]  What is missing, however, is the enforceability because it lacks the summons.
[01:52:37.880 --> 01:52:48.880]  Well, they are, they are still in process because they're sending you, they're sending you an official document from the court saying the same things that a summons state.
[01:52:48.880 --> 01:52:49.880]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:52:49.880 --> 01:52:50.880]  Within 10 days.
[01:52:50.880 --> 01:52:51.880]  Okay.
[01:52:51.880 --> 01:52:52.880]  But it has no legal authority.
[01:52:52.880 --> 01:52:54.880]  This document they send you.
[01:52:54.880 --> 01:52:57.880]  The document that has the legal authority gives the official summons.
[01:52:57.880 --> 01:52:58.880]  Okay.
[01:52:58.880 --> 01:53:02.880]  So you're saying they sent you a letter that's pretending to be the summons.
[01:53:02.880 --> 01:53:03.880]  Absolutely.
[01:53:03.880 --> 01:53:05.880]  Along with the questionnaire.
[01:53:05.880 --> 01:53:09.880]  No, it telling you to go online and fill it out.
[01:53:09.880 --> 01:53:10.880]  Okay.
[01:53:10.880 --> 01:53:11.880]  Yeah.
[01:53:11.880 --> 01:53:12.880]  Now you've got a case.
[01:53:12.880 --> 01:53:17.880]  If they didn't actually send you the questionnaire and they're telling you that you're going to get charged with a crime.
[01:53:17.880 --> 01:53:21.880]  If you don't follow what this letter says, then yeah, absolutely.
[01:53:21.880 --> 01:53:24.880]  Now you've got a simulating legal process.
[01:53:24.880 --> 01:53:25.880]  Absolutely.
[01:53:25.880 --> 01:53:29.880]  Follow that locally and then take those criminal complaints that you file locally.
[01:53:29.880 --> 01:53:38.880]  As a matter of fact, if you follow me on Facebook, I've posted an example of how to write a criminal complaint for exactly that very thing.
[01:53:38.880 --> 01:53:40.880]  That's what I was going to ask you.
[01:53:40.880 --> 01:53:46.880]  At one time I heard y'all mention that someplace you could go that has model complaints or something for the judiciary.
[01:53:46.880 --> 01:53:53.880]  Yeah, but I've actually written up a sworn criminal statement accusing a court of doing exactly that thing.
[01:53:53.880 --> 01:53:55.880]  Simulating legal process.
[01:53:55.880 --> 01:53:59.880]  It's in my Facebook group on my tower of law group on Facebook.
[01:53:59.880 --> 01:54:02.880]  If you can't find it there, then just send me an email.
[01:54:02.880 --> 01:54:06.880]  Let me know you want it and I'll email it back to you because I've got a hard copy of it.
[01:54:06.880 --> 01:54:07.880]  Okay.
[01:54:07.880 --> 01:54:08.880]  All right.
[01:54:08.880 --> 01:54:13.880]  Do you remember off in where the, because there's several other charges that I think I can file.
[01:54:13.880 --> 01:54:16.880]  Everything you can throw at them is in this.
[01:54:16.880 --> 01:54:22.880]  If it's possible to apply it, it's in this, including official oppression, abusive physical capacity, all of it.
[01:54:22.880 --> 01:54:23.880]  Okay.
[01:54:23.880 --> 01:54:29.880]  So whether I just search for official oppression on your site, Facebook site?
[01:54:29.880 --> 01:54:30.880]  No.
[01:54:30.880 --> 01:54:34.880]  Go in my tower of law group and look in the file section.
[01:54:34.880 --> 01:54:38.880]  It'll be posted in the files as an actual Word document.
[01:54:38.880 --> 01:54:39.880]  Okay.
[01:54:39.880 --> 01:54:41.880]  I think I'm a member of your tower of law group.
[01:54:41.880 --> 01:54:42.880]  Okay.
[01:54:42.880 --> 01:54:44.880]  Then you should be able to find it pretty easy.
[01:54:44.880 --> 01:54:45.880]  All right.
[01:54:45.880 --> 01:54:51.880]  Well, this is something I've decided that when a person retires and you've got the time, we should all be doing this.
[01:54:51.880 --> 01:54:52.880]  Absolutely.
[01:54:52.880 --> 01:54:53.880]  I agree.
[01:54:53.880 --> 01:54:56.880]  The more help I've got, the better off we all are.
[01:54:56.880 --> 01:54:59.880]  Well, everybody I see, I tell them, check it out.
[01:54:59.880 --> 01:55:00.880]  Check it out.
[01:55:00.880 --> 01:55:01.880]  Do something.
[01:55:01.880 --> 01:55:06.880]  And you can't go down there and just complain because they just kind of look at you and walk off.
[01:55:06.880 --> 01:55:07.880]  Right.
[01:55:07.880 --> 01:55:09.880]  But all right.
[01:55:09.880 --> 01:55:13.880]  But yeah, if you'll look that up, you'll see in there how to adapt that to exactly what you're talking about.
[01:55:13.880 --> 01:55:16.880]  But they do the same thing in the justice and municipal courts all the time.
[01:55:16.880 --> 01:55:19.880]  They send a form letter pretending to be a summons and it's not.
[01:55:19.880 --> 01:55:22.880]  That sounds exactly like what you're describing to me.
[01:55:22.880 --> 01:55:27.880]  And so everything that's in there, you should be able to adapt very, very easily and very directly.
[01:55:27.880 --> 01:55:28.880]  All right, buddy.
[01:55:28.880 --> 01:55:29.880]  I appreciate it.
[01:55:29.880 --> 01:55:30.880]  Yes, sir.
[01:55:30.880 --> 01:55:31.880]  No problem.
[01:55:31.880 --> 01:55:44.880]  And like I said, I would still take a copy of that sworn criminal statement along with a copy of that form letter and I would send it to the Texas Supreme Court because they're the ones responsible for oversight of the district courts.
[01:55:44.880 --> 01:55:51.880]  Not the Secretary of State, but what's the other one up there?
[01:55:51.880 --> 01:55:55.880]  The head administrative judge or the judicial conduct committee, which one are you talking about?
[01:55:55.880 --> 01:55:57.880]  I don't know, really.
[01:55:57.880 --> 01:55:58.880]  Yeah.
[01:55:58.880 --> 01:56:00.880]  Go to the Texas Supreme Court.
[01:56:00.880 --> 01:56:01.880]  Go to them first.
[01:56:01.880 --> 01:56:02.880]  Okay.
[01:56:02.880 --> 01:56:03.880]  See what they do.
[01:56:03.880 --> 01:56:04.880]  All right.
[01:56:04.880 --> 01:56:05.880]  Okay.
[01:56:05.880 --> 01:56:06.880]  All right.
[01:56:06.880 --> 01:56:07.880]  I appreciate it, sir.
[01:56:07.880 --> 01:56:08.880]  Yes, sir.
[01:56:08.880 --> 01:56:09.880]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:56:09.880 --> 01:56:10.880]  Thank you.
[01:56:10.880 --> 01:56:11.880]  All right.
[01:56:11.880 --> 01:56:16.880]  Carlos, I can give you two minutes.
[01:56:16.880 --> 01:56:17.880]  Two minutes.
[01:56:17.880 --> 01:56:18.880]  Sorry, man.
[01:56:18.880 --> 01:56:19.880]  That's all I got left.
[01:56:19.880 --> 01:56:20.880]  That's fine.
[01:56:20.880 --> 01:56:21.880]  That's all.
[01:56:21.880 --> 01:56:24.880]  I have a really quick question.
[01:56:24.880 --> 01:56:27.880]  We'll talk into the phone so I can hear it.
[01:56:27.880 --> 01:56:28.880]  Huh?
[01:56:28.880 --> 01:56:30.880]  Talk into the phone so I can hear it.
[01:56:30.880 --> 01:56:32.880]  I got it right here next to my teeth.
[01:56:32.880 --> 01:56:33.880]  All right.
[01:56:33.880 --> 01:56:34.880]  Go ahead.
[01:56:34.880 --> 01:56:42.880]  Right here, do you have something in the process seminar on how to fight city ordinances?
[01:56:42.880 --> 01:56:50.880]  I have information in there on city ordinances, but there's a lot more information on my website about that on my legal blog.
[01:56:50.880 --> 01:57:03.880]  And it tells you all of the law and the constitutional provisions that gives you the ammunition you need to fight a city ordinance as not being binding public law and have nothing to do with private persons and property.
[01:57:03.880 --> 01:57:04.880]  Okay.
[01:57:04.880 --> 01:57:10.880]  I mean, I've got five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten different articles on my legal blog about city ordinances.
[01:57:10.880 --> 01:57:13.880]  Just go on the blog and do a search for ordinances.
[01:57:13.880 --> 01:57:14.880]  There's a search.
[01:57:14.880 --> 01:57:18.880]  There's a magnifying glass and a search field you can click on at the top.
[01:57:18.880 --> 01:57:25.880]  Just type in ordinance, hit enter, and you'll get a whole list of every article that's got the word in it.
[01:57:25.880 --> 01:57:26.880]  Okay.
[01:57:26.880 --> 01:57:30.880]  How do you – how do you – how do I get into blog city?
[01:57:30.880 --> 01:57:32.880]  How do you what?
[01:57:32.880 --> 01:57:33.880]  How do I get in there?
[01:57:33.880 --> 01:57:34.880]  It's at wordpress.
[01:57:34.880 --> 01:57:44.880]  Tau of law, T-A-O-O-F dot L-A – or T-A-O-O-F-L-A-W dot wordpress.com.
[01:57:44.880 --> 01:57:45.880]  Oh, no.
[01:57:45.880 --> 01:57:46.880]  That's the one.
[01:57:46.880 --> 01:57:48.880]  That's wordpress.com.
[01:57:48.880 --> 01:57:49.880]  All right.
[01:57:49.880 --> 01:57:50.880]  All right.
[01:57:50.880 --> 01:57:51.880]  It's a good question.
[01:57:51.880 --> 01:57:52.880]  All right.
[01:57:52.880 --> 01:57:56.880]  And I didn't need to count to you, so I guess I'll be in touch with you later.
[01:57:56.880 --> 01:57:57.880]  Okay.
[01:57:57.880 --> 01:57:58.880]  All right.
[01:57:58.880 --> 01:57:59.880]  Thank you, Eddie.
[01:57:59.880 --> 01:58:00.880]  Yes, sir.
[01:58:00.880 --> 01:58:01.880]  Thank you very much.
[01:58:01.880 --> 01:58:02.880]  Have a good night.
[01:58:02.880 --> 01:58:03.880]  All right.
[01:58:03.880 --> 01:58:04.880]  I'm out of time.
[01:58:04.880 --> 01:58:05.880]  We are at the end of the show.
[01:58:05.880 --> 01:58:09.120]  I can't get your call tonight, but if you need to call me or get in touch with me, send
[01:58:09.120 --> 01:58:10.120]  me an email.
[01:58:10.120 --> 01:58:12.880]  Eddie, E-D-D-I-E at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:58:12.880 --> 01:58:13.880]  All right, folks.
[01:58:13.880 --> 01:58:16.880]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show.
[01:58:16.880 --> 01:58:17.880]  Your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:17.880 --> 01:58:21.880]  I want to thank all the callers and all the listeners that are out there.
[01:58:21.880 --> 01:58:28.880]  Folks, please, we need you to support us like we work to support you, to educate you, to
[01:58:28.880 --> 01:58:32.880]  help you, to provide you with information you need to know.
[01:58:32.880 --> 01:58:33.880]  All right.
[01:58:33.880 --> 01:58:50.880]  I want all of y'all to have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:58:50.880 --> 01:59:17.640]  God bless you.
[01:59:17.640 --> 01:59:25.440]  online at bfa.org. This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross
[01:59:25.440 --> 01:59:31.280]  references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. This is truly
[01:59:31.280 --> 01:59:36.160]  a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version,
[01:59:36.160 --> 01:59:49.560]  call us toll-free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.