[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  The following is the last spot you buy, the low stars low down.
[00:08.000 --> 00:14.440]  Markets for Wednesday the 21st of February 2018, closed with gold at $1,324.64 an ounce,
[00:14.440 --> 00:22.520]  silver $16.50 an ounce, Texas crude $61.90 a barrel, bitcoins at $10,673.20, ethereum
[00:22.520 --> 00:35.080]  $851.12, bitcoin cash $1,308.63 and finding litecoins at $214.03 a crypto coin.
[00:35.080 --> 00:41.200]  Today in History, the year 1965, black nationalist icon Malcolm X was assassinated at the Auburn
[00:41.200 --> 00:43.240]  Ballroom in New York City.
[00:43.240 --> 00:46.760]  He stated just two days before being shot in an interview with Gordon Parks that the
[00:46.760 --> 00:49.680]  nation of Islam was actively trying to kill him.
[00:49.680 --> 00:57.840]  In recent news, the White House released a memo on Tuesday the 20th where President
[00:57.840 --> 01:02.400]  Trump ordered Attorney General Jeff Sessions to direct the DOJ to propose new regulations
[01:02.400 --> 01:06.880]  to ban firearm modifications like bump stocks and all devices that turn legal weapons into
[01:06.880 --> 01:07.880]  machine guns.
[01:07.880 --> 01:11.800]  President Trump also tweeted later that evening that, quote, whether we are Republican or Democrat
[01:11.800 --> 01:14.840]  we must now focus on strengthening background checks.
[01:14.840 --> 01:19.040]  This initiative in reaction, of course, to last week's school shooting in Parkland, Florida
[01:19.040 --> 01:24.440]  that killed 17 people, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders will relate to Tuesday, as well
[01:24.440 --> 01:28.320]  that the president expressed his support for efforts to improve the federal background
[01:28.320 --> 01:29.320]  system.
[01:29.320 --> 01:33.480]  In the coming days, we will continue to explore ways to ensure the safety and security of
[01:33.480 --> 01:40.320]  our schools.
[01:40.320 --> 01:44.200]  Cape Town, South Africa is the first major city of its size to be facing a water shortage
[01:44.200 --> 01:48.240]  with day zero of the tap running dry, essentially being July 9th.
[01:48.240 --> 01:51.360]  City services and hospitals will continue to be supplied with water, but everyone else
[01:51.360 --> 01:55.320]  will be left to the mercy of natural springs for drinking, washing and cleaning, with the
[01:55.320 --> 01:59.560]  shortage affecting everyone from drinking to water waste management.
[01:59.560 --> 02:02.040]  A million households are expected to be affected.
[02:02.040 --> 02:05.720]  Officials lay the blame on three years of drought while residents blame their local representatives
[02:05.720 --> 02:10.800]  and national leaders dragging their feet and coming to a budget to diversify the city water
[02:10.800 --> 02:11.800]  system.
[02:11.800 --> 02:15.520]  A lot of hopeful plans and desalination plans, water recycling facilities and getting the
[02:15.520 --> 02:19.280]  natural springs onto the national supply, but unfortunately government is really slow
[02:19.280 --> 02:23.320]  in getting things done and nothing substantial has been achieved in any of these areas.
[02:23.320 --> 02:27.680]  To add irony to the crisis, Cape Town sits on a huge natural water reserve with about
[02:27.680 --> 02:29.600]  70 springs around the city.
[02:29.600 --> 02:33.840]  There have been consumption limits set to 50 liters per person per day from their home
[02:33.840 --> 02:36.920]  and 25 liters per person per visit at the springs.
[02:36.920 --> 02:40.280]  Luckily many of the province's farmers have been able to divert water to Cape Town as a
[02:40.280 --> 02:43.280]  temporary extension.
[02:43.280 --> 02:46.960]  The Wilmsville Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors to have a product or a service
[02:46.960 --> 02:53.960]  that you like to advertise with us, feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2257.
[02:53.960 --> 03:23.880]  This was Rick Rody with your lowdown for February 21st, 2018.
[03:23.880 --> 03:51.000]  Alright folks, good evening, this is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host
[03:51.000 --> 03:52.000]  Eddie Craig.
[03:52.000 --> 03:58.200]  Today is February 26th, 2018, yes I am live tonight, I didn't know if I was going to make
[03:58.200 --> 04:00.880]  it that way, but managed to do so.
[04:00.880 --> 04:05.440]  A couple of interesting things I want to get into, or at least interesting from my perspective
[04:05.440 --> 04:12.480]  on things anyway, before I start taking callers on the show tonight, the first one is something
[04:12.480 --> 04:18.640]  that occurred while Lawdog and I were out walking to get our dinner this evening.
[04:18.640 --> 04:23.080]  Two ladies walked up to me and asked if I voted and all this kind of stuff and handed
[04:23.080 --> 04:34.080]  me this leaflet for some lady attorney that's running for the 331st Judicial District here
[04:34.080 --> 04:39.120]  and on her card it specifically reads Progressive Democrat.
[04:39.120 --> 04:43.200]  Now if you've been around Austin and the rest of the world long enough to understand that
[04:43.200 --> 04:52.480]  Progressive Democrat is actually code for rabid status liberal, then you would know
[04:52.480 --> 04:54.960]  why I made the response that I did to these ladies.
[04:54.960 --> 04:58.440]  I handed them back their leaflet and said, ladies I would not vote for a Progressive
[04:58.440 --> 05:02.160]  Democrat if you were threatening to shoot me in the head.
[05:02.160 --> 05:05.520]  And they were like, oh my god, mister, and I looked at them and said look, it's just
[05:05.520 --> 05:06.520]  the way it is.
[05:06.520 --> 05:11.160]  I wouldn't vote for anybody on the other side of the aisle either if their business was
[05:11.160 --> 05:17.040]  destroying individual rights and turning us all into servants of the government.
[05:17.040 --> 05:22.120]  So don't take it personal, not voting for a liberal Democrat ever, or Progressive Democrat
[05:22.120 --> 05:23.120]  ever.
[05:23.120 --> 05:24.120]  Okay?
[05:24.120 --> 05:28.280]  One of the biggest problems we have right now is that's who's in control of them near
[05:28.280 --> 05:32.840]  every branch of government we have are the Progressive Democrats.
[05:32.840 --> 05:37.320]  Right here in Texas your rights are getting thrown out the window because of Progressive
[05:37.320 --> 05:39.720]  Democrats.
[05:39.720 --> 05:47.480]  Now the second event was an email that I received from a listener and sometimes caller.
[05:47.480 --> 05:52.360]  And I'm not going to give out names and I'm not going to get into any specifics about
[05:52.360 --> 05:58.240]  that that would allow others to identify and make fun of this particular individual however.
[05:58.240 --> 06:03.880]  I am going to address the content of the email to some degree.
[06:03.880 --> 06:08.080]  In this email they were upset about something that I said to them when they called into
[06:08.080 --> 06:09.960]  the show.
[06:09.960 --> 06:17.480]  Now they took Umbridge with it because they thought I was belittling them on the air.
[06:17.480 --> 06:24.640]  The thing about it is is I didn't do it to belittle, I did it because I was being literal.
[06:24.640 --> 06:30.560]  And the reason I was being literal is because they tend to do exactly what I said as much
[06:30.560 --> 06:32.520]  as they do anything else.
[06:32.520 --> 06:39.640]  And the reason is because A, they call in not to ask a reasonable question and a reasonable
[06:39.640 --> 06:44.480]  amount of time and get out of the way for other callers to be helped.
[06:44.480 --> 06:52.200]  They call in and they drag stuff out that has no business being on the show for that,
[06:52.200 --> 06:53.200]  for whatever.
[06:53.200 --> 06:55.920]  It's got nothing to do with nothing.
[06:55.920 --> 06:59.920]  It's just there to waste time and eat up the time I could use for other things.
[06:59.920 --> 07:02.480]  I don't appreciate that.
[07:02.480 --> 07:05.280]  Another thing, okay?
[07:05.280 --> 07:11.240]  If you want to disseminate information about things on my show then make a request to be
[07:11.240 --> 07:13.800]  a guest on the show for that purpose.
[07:13.800 --> 07:18.240]  Don't call in as a caller and then try to hog up the air time that everybody else could
[07:18.240 --> 07:25.720]  be using to get help with something to present information that I don't know what your qualifications
[07:25.720 --> 07:31.560]  and capabilities are to be presenting in the first place, okay?
[07:31.560 --> 07:37.280]  The other thing is, I was told that the reason it bothered them is because they see me as
[07:37.280 --> 07:38.440]  their teacher.
[07:38.440 --> 07:42.440]  Well, let me clear something up here real quick for everyone.
[07:42.440 --> 07:45.680]  I am not your teacher.
[07:45.680 --> 07:48.320]  You are not my students.
[07:48.320 --> 07:52.360]  Those people are the ones that came to my class and Austin on a regular basis for that
[07:52.360 --> 07:53.760]  purpose.
[07:53.760 --> 07:56.600]  You are listeners to my radio show.
[07:56.600 --> 08:01.920]  This show for that purpose is absolutely no different than the evening news or anything
[08:01.920 --> 08:02.920]  else.
[08:02.920 --> 08:08.560]  The only difference is that we actually take callers and commentary on the stories we're
[08:08.560 --> 08:10.040]  discussing.
[08:10.040 --> 08:11.040]  That's the difference.
[08:11.040 --> 08:17.440]  And where they're personal and we can offer assistance, we do so.
[08:17.440 --> 08:18.920]  But I am not your teacher.
[08:18.920 --> 08:22.400]  I am a provider of information, okay?
[08:22.400 --> 08:26.040]  I don't see you folks out there in Radio Land as students.
[08:26.040 --> 08:34.280]  I see you as grownups capable of independent, intelligent thought and action.
[08:34.280 --> 08:42.560]  It is when you do and say things that disprove that that I tend to get upset because I try
[08:42.560 --> 08:48.240]  to give everybody the benefit of the doubt on being all of those things capable and intelligent
[08:48.240 --> 08:51.440]  and smart enough to figure out things on your own.
[08:51.440 --> 08:57.480]  I give you the information that I do because it's not something you would normally stumble
[08:57.480 --> 09:00.680]  across in your day-to-day lives.
[09:00.680 --> 09:05.520]  But it is something that affects you in your day-to-day life.
[09:05.520 --> 09:13.800]  And normally it is adversely, which is the reason why I feel you need to know about it.
[09:13.800 --> 09:15.960]  But you are not my students.
[09:15.960 --> 09:23.320]  I give you information in the hopes that you will take it upon yourself to dig deeper,
[09:23.320 --> 09:30.920]  to learn more, to stop letting this stuff happen because it's not something I can fix
[09:30.920 --> 09:34.600]  all by my lonesome on this end of a microphone.
[09:34.600 --> 09:39.480]  It's not something I can fix all by my lonesome helping individual people with their particular
[09:39.480 --> 09:41.000]  cases.
[09:41.000 --> 09:43.040]  It takes more than that.
[09:43.040 --> 09:46.960]  It takes you making an effort.
[09:46.960 --> 09:48.840]  I give you information.
[09:48.840 --> 09:51.720]  I am not here to hold your hand.
[09:51.720 --> 09:56.480]  I am not here to play teacher.
[09:56.480 --> 09:58.040]  I'm a radio host.
[09:58.040 --> 10:04.720]  I'm here to give you information that's verifiable, demonstrable truth.
[10:04.720 --> 10:12.520]  To help you where I can in the time allotted to me to get it done on this show.
[10:12.520 --> 10:18.320]  And whenever I'm working on cases behind the scenes, I do the best I can there as well.
[10:18.320 --> 10:27.360]  But that's a raise to be handled off the air, not eating up the radio time.
[10:27.360 --> 10:33.960]  So if you're going to take personal issue with me on saying, don't take me off when
[10:33.960 --> 10:37.960]  you call in here, then understand why I would need to be saying that.
[10:37.960 --> 10:41.560]  First off, you say you're my student.
[10:41.560 --> 10:46.280]  A student is someone who learns while they're being taught.
[10:46.280 --> 10:52.480]  A student is someone who is graded on what they've learned about what they've been taught.
[10:52.480 --> 10:59.480]  A student is someone who takes information and develops it into something useful, whether
[10:59.480 --> 11:04.640]  it be to pass their class or to integrate into their life or whatever, or their career,
[11:04.640 --> 11:06.920]  however that works.
[11:06.920 --> 11:15.040]  A student does not need to be given the same class every damned year.
[11:15.040 --> 11:24.240]  They don't need to have the same lessons every single class, or at least they should.
[11:24.240 --> 11:29.520]  So when I say, don't say something that's going to take me off, it's because by the
[11:29.520 --> 11:35.880]  time I'm to the point of telling you that, you have already done it multiple times.
[11:35.880 --> 11:41.480]  And you've done it because as a student, you are failing miserably, if that's how you
[11:41.480 --> 11:43.600]  wish to classify yourself.
[11:43.600 --> 11:49.720]  And the reason you're failing miserably is because you still, to this day, cannot follow
[11:49.720 --> 11:53.920]  simple instructions.
[11:53.920 --> 11:58.560]  How many years have I been on this show telling you, when you do something in relation to
[11:58.560 --> 12:02.240]  a case in a court, you do it in writing?
[12:02.240 --> 12:07.360]  And how many times do these people, same people in fact, call in here and tell me what they're
[12:07.360 --> 12:12.840]  going to do in their case, and it is anything but the way I've instructed you how many
[12:12.840 --> 12:16.360]  dozens of times to do it?
[12:16.360 --> 12:24.160]  That doesn't qualify you as a student because a student learns.
[12:24.160 --> 12:30.760]  Now again, I don't want to turn anybody off of listening to this show and the information
[12:30.760 --> 12:37.600]  that I put out there, but you need to understand the role that's being played here, okay?
[12:37.600 --> 12:41.280]  I am not your personal advisor.
[12:41.280 --> 12:43.080]  I'm not.
[12:43.080 --> 12:48.280]  I give you the information in the hope that you will take the next step to learn what
[12:48.280 --> 12:58.440]  you need to learn and to use it, to talk about it, to share it, to make it known to others.
[12:58.440 --> 13:06.320]  Okay, because I can't reach everybody, and I sure as hell can't make everybody understand.
[13:06.320 --> 13:10.720]  But if you're going to call up in here and get the information, then I expect you to
[13:10.720 --> 13:17.560]  be capable enough to do something useful with it and to retain it.
[13:17.560 --> 13:24.480]  So don't get mad at me because I'm telling you, don't take me off by showing me that
[13:24.480 --> 13:30.320]  you aren't paying any attention to what I'm trying to tell you, and then come back later
[13:30.320 --> 13:37.360]  and blame me because it didn't work.
[13:37.360 --> 13:38.920]  Understand that.
[13:38.920 --> 13:41.080]  I give you guys information.
[13:41.080 --> 13:43.080]  I hope it's useful information.
[13:43.080 --> 13:48.880]  I hope it's information that ticks you off enough to get out of your arm chair and get
[13:48.880 --> 13:56.040]  mad and start getting in somebody's face that's responsible for the problems that I'm talking
[13:56.040 --> 13:59.640]  about on this show.
[13:59.640 --> 14:03.800]  The only way we're going to make a change in any of this is to get in the face of those
[14:03.800 --> 14:08.720]  that are causing the damn problem, like the progressive Democrats.
[14:08.720 --> 14:15.640]  You know, the people that wouldn't listen to you anyway, even if they get elected, they
[14:15.640 --> 14:17.120]  don't care about you.
[14:17.120 --> 14:18.920]  They've never cared about you.
[14:18.920 --> 14:24.600]  They care about destroying individual rights and liberty and making something for themselves
[14:24.600 --> 14:26.880]  when it's all over.
[14:26.880 --> 14:35.360]  You and I are running a distant 55th in that line.
[14:35.360 --> 14:41.360]  I am not trying to beat up on any one individual, but I'm going to tell you right now, I don't
[14:41.360 --> 14:47.480]  owe you anything in relation to teaching you.
[14:47.480 --> 14:51.200]  I do this voluntarily.
[14:51.200 --> 14:54.520]  Nobody's paying me to be on this radio show.
[14:54.520 --> 14:58.840]  Nobody's paying me to learn what I learn.
[14:58.840 --> 15:05.640]  The only thing anybody's paying me for is the information that I've developed into useful
[15:05.640 --> 15:12.880]  documentation that you may or may not be able to put together on your own any amount of time
[15:12.880 --> 15:15.440]  you've got to do it.
[15:15.440 --> 15:19.560]  If you can get all the research and everything else done that I've done that took me years
[15:19.560 --> 15:23.320]  to do, any amount of time you've got more power to you.
[15:23.320 --> 15:26.840]  I'm happy for you, glad to meet you.
[15:26.840 --> 15:34.440]  But the whole reason it's out there is for those that can't.
[15:34.440 --> 15:42.720]  But please don't be writing me emails like I owe you.
[15:42.720 --> 15:49.640]  Now that being said, every time that I have helped somebody with a case, and that case
[15:49.640 --> 15:57.160]  has been important and something big that needs to be made publicly available to show
[15:57.160 --> 16:02.920]  that it can be done, it's been posted in an article on my legal blog with the permission
[16:02.920 --> 16:06.080]  of the person that the case relates to, of course.
[16:06.080 --> 16:10.920]  I'm not going to put anybody's information out there without their permission.
[16:10.920 --> 16:17.640]  So I get it, and if I do get it, I put it out there just to show it can be done.
[16:17.640 --> 16:20.880]  And that, yes, I do have a clue what I'm talking about.
[16:20.880 --> 16:28.680]  And here's the cases that I've helped win or get dismissed to prove that.
[16:28.680 --> 16:38.120]  But my ability to do that, and my willingness to do that, does not make me owe you or your
[16:38.120 --> 16:41.880]  teacher.
[16:41.880 --> 16:44.200]  I'm trying to help.
[16:44.200 --> 16:47.200]  Don't make it more difficult than it is, please.
[16:47.200 --> 16:52.120]  All right, folks, y'all hang on, we'll be right back after this break, and I'll turn
[16:52.120 --> 16:53.280]  the phones on.
[16:53.280 --> 17:00.960]  So y'all hold on.
[17:00.960 --> 17:01.960]  Thanks, Cookie.
[17:01.960 --> 17:02.960]  Cookie?
[17:02.960 --> 17:03.960]  I love cookies.
[17:03.960 --> 17:05.280]  Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers.
[17:05.280 --> 17:07.280]  No, these are yucky cookies.
[17:07.280 --> 17:08.280]  Cookie?
[17:08.280 --> 17:09.280]  Yucky?
[17:09.280 --> 17:10.280]  No, no bad cookies.
[17:10.280 --> 17:11.280]  You can't even eat these cookies.
[17:11.280 --> 17:12.280]  These are cyber cookies.
[17:12.280 --> 17:13.280]  You can't eat?
[17:13.280 --> 17:14.280]  No.
[17:14.280 --> 17:17.280]  They are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer.
[17:17.280 --> 17:18.280]  Me have apples.
[17:18.280 --> 17:19.280]  Really?
[17:19.280 --> 17:21.280]  Oh, that's an actual apple.
[17:21.280 --> 17:23.280]  Yummy apple.
[17:23.280 --> 17:27.280]  I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash.
[17:27.280 --> 17:33.280]  I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them.
[17:33.280 --> 17:35.280]  Bye-bye, yucky cookies.
[17:35.280 --> 17:41.280]  Now, I go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand
[17:41.280 --> 17:47.280]  side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy
[17:47.280 --> 17:48.280]  new cookie.
[17:48.280 --> 17:49.280]  No cookies?
[17:49.280 --> 17:50.280]  For me?
[17:50.280 --> 17:51.280]  Early Christmas present.
[17:51.280 --> 17:56.280]  And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link, and I give a little present to
[17:56.280 --> 17:57.280]  this radio network too.
[17:57.280 --> 17:58.280]  These are cookies.
[17:58.280 --> 17:59.280]  These are classified.
[17:59.280 --> 18:09.280]  It's the 2017 LogosRadio Network annual fundraiser sponsored by Central Texas Gunworks.
[18:09.280 --> 18:11.280]  The events distributed in Fat Sal's deli.
[18:11.280 --> 18:14.280]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter the win.
[18:14.280 --> 18:17.280]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[18:17.280 --> 18:22.280]  From Central Texas Gunworks, first place up for grabs is Spikes Tactical AR-15.
[18:22.280 --> 18:26.280]  Second place, Taurus PT-111 G2 9mm Pistol.
[18:26.280 --> 18:31.280]  From Defense Distributed, third place, the AR-308 80% lower.
[18:31.280 --> 18:34.280]  Fourth place, the AR-15 80% lower.
[18:34.280 --> 18:38.280]  From Fat Sal's deli, fifth place, $100 gift card for Fat Sal's deli.
[18:38.280 --> 18:41.280]  Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[18:41.280 --> 18:43.280]  That's LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[18:43.280 --> 18:48.280]  Also, if you purchase Randy Kelton's ebook, Legal101, you get four chances to win.
[18:48.280 --> 18:52.280]  Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar, get 10 chances to win.
[18:52.280 --> 18:55.280]  And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[18:55.280 --> 19:14.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:25.280 --> 19:53.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:53.280 --> 20:08.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[20:08.280 --> 20:36.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[20:36.280 --> 21:03.280]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[21:03.280 --> 21:10.280]  That is where you have to do your own due diligence and figure things out a bit here.
[21:10.280 --> 21:16.280]  The rules, the particular procedure may be slightly different from state to state.
[21:16.280 --> 21:24.280]  Some states treat this stuff, some of this stuff as civil while others treat it as criminal and et cetera, et cetera.
[21:24.280 --> 21:30.280]  So it varies, and I'm not up to speed on every state out there and how they're handling it.
[21:30.280 --> 21:38.280]  Again, you're there. You're the one that needs to be digging into this to find out how this works, okay?
[21:38.280 --> 21:48.280]  I can give you general information and then specific information on how it works in Texas specifically.
[21:48.280 --> 21:55.280]  I am intimately familiar with that aspect of the law when it comes to Texas.
[21:55.280 --> 22:03.280]  And I am familiar enough with the statutory schemes and the way things are set up to know that in a general sense,
[22:03.280 --> 22:15.280]  it works similarly across all the states as long as the nature remains the same, criminal versus civil versus administrative, okay?
[22:15.280 --> 22:22.280]  Because the rules and procedure for each of those is different, and it will vary state to state.
[22:22.280 --> 22:29.280]  Now due process is a principle that's the same no matter which state you're in.
[22:29.280 --> 22:37.280]  And your ability to have a right to due process is the same regardless of which state you're in.
[22:37.280 --> 22:47.280]  So in some cases, no matter where you are, I can tell you specific things, and in other cases, I can't.
[22:47.280 --> 22:58.280]  But the one thing that I have always tried to do is to make sure that the information presented was enough for you to find what you needed wherever you are,
[22:58.280 --> 23:05.280]  or at least to get some idea of what to be looking for, okay?
[23:05.280 --> 23:12.280]  I don't need you to call into my show 15 different times to just to tell me each time that you got stopped again.
[23:12.280 --> 23:17.280]  You got arrested again. You got your window broke again.
[23:17.280 --> 23:23.280]  Why? Why do you need to call in and tell me that? Why does everybody else need to know that? How does it help anyone?
[23:23.280 --> 23:31.280]  Because if you haven't figured out by now how to deal with that on your end, how's it helping you?
[23:31.280 --> 23:38.280]  You see the problem? You're calling in to tell me something that what do you want me to do about it?
[23:38.280 --> 23:44.280]  I can't unbreak your window. I can't reverse time and back it up and try it again.
[23:44.280 --> 23:49.280]  So what's the point?
[23:49.280 --> 23:54.280]  You're the one that lives where you live.
[23:54.280 --> 24:00.280]  You've got to figure this stuff out because you're the only one that's there when it's going on.
[24:00.280 --> 24:07.280]  So it's up to you to understand and learn how to handle it, okay?
[24:07.280 --> 24:11.280]  I can't do that for you.
[24:11.280 --> 24:19.280]  Nobody can do that for you unless you keep an attorney in your trunk or sitting in the seat next to you.
[24:19.280 --> 24:26.280]  But you're running a risk of getting sold out at the first time things go south even with an attorney in your pocket.
[24:26.280 --> 24:35.280]  So either way, the point being, folks, understand what this show is.
[24:35.280 --> 24:40.280]  It's about information, okay?
[24:40.280 --> 24:45.280]  I read this stuff every day. I study this stuff every day. I write about this stuff every day.
[24:45.280 --> 24:53.280]  I theorize about this stuff every day. I read case law on this stuff every day.
[24:53.280 --> 25:00.280]  And I pull my hair out every day, okay?
[25:00.280 --> 25:04.280]  Added troubles I don't need, but I get them anyway.
[25:04.280 --> 25:10.280]  I get several thousand, and that is not an exaggeration. That is not a joke.
[25:10.280 --> 25:19.280]  I get several thousand new emails every single day.
[25:19.280 --> 25:21.280]  Every single day.
[25:21.280 --> 25:31.280]  It eats up a good portion of my day just to try to find the ones that seem to have the most important thing going on in them.
[25:31.280 --> 25:36.280]  For instance, somebody being charged with a DUI versus just a speeding ticket.
[25:36.280 --> 25:41.280]  Somebody getting charged with aggravated assault or spousal abuse or something like that.
[25:41.280 --> 25:48.280]  The ones that I try to help because they're the ones going to jail if they don't do something.
[25:48.280 --> 25:55.280]  They're the ones going to get railroaded to prison if they don't do something.
[25:55.280 --> 25:59.280]  So my plate is kind of full, okay?
[25:59.280 --> 26:11.280]  Not to mention I've got a dog here who just flat out does not appreciate me at all if I don't give him some time of his own.
[26:11.280 --> 26:18.280]  He's smarter than most attorneys, hence the reason he needs to have something to do.
[26:18.280 --> 26:30.280]  But either way, understand, I'm not trying to make you not like me or not want to listen to this show. I'm trying to get you to understand why it is important for you to be self-sufficient.
[26:30.280 --> 26:38.280]  I can get you started, but I can't finish this for you. I can't get you up to speed. You're going to have to do that.
[26:38.280 --> 26:49.280]  This is about being the best individual each and every one of you can be for yourself and for your family.
[26:49.280 --> 27:13.280]  Because if you don't understand everything yourself, then those that you trust to take responsibility for you can say and do anything they want and you have no choice but to believe them and accept it.
[27:13.280 --> 27:21.280]  This, ladies and gentlemen, is what these attorneys have counted on for far too long.
[27:21.280 --> 27:35.280]  They count on you not knowing anything, not what's going on, not what questions to ask, not what the procedure is, not what the law says.
[27:35.280 --> 27:50.280]  They want you to be as dumb as a rock because that way they can control you and everything about your case.
[27:50.280 --> 28:02.280]  And that is very, very detrimental to your legal well-being. I've proven that time and time again.
[28:02.280 --> 28:16.280]  Putting your fate in the hands of an attorney with no knowledge of your own to know what they should be doing and how they should be doing it is a very, very dangerous proposition.
[28:16.280 --> 28:32.280]  And believe me, I've got lots of people whose cases I've helped them with that would be more than happy to tell you that because if it were not for the things that we did that the attorney would never have done, they might very well be sitting in prison right now.
[28:32.280 --> 28:48.280]  Not jail, prison. And I don't wish that on anyone except for those responsible for this mess. And I would love to be the one to put them there.
[28:48.280 --> 29:02.280]  But the best way to, again, that I see to make that happen is to get you people on the same page I'm on with the information that I have about what's wrong and who's responsible for it.
[29:02.280 --> 29:11.280]  Because only then can we focus on the solution to go after the problem which are these people.
[29:11.280 --> 29:24.280]  People that think they have a right to dictate your life and they just call themselves government so they can do it.
[29:24.280 --> 29:30.280]  That's not what this was supposed to be about. Not at all.
[29:30.280 --> 29:45.280]  Okay. All right. We are now coming into the second break. I see a caller on the board so I will pick that up on the next one. Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[29:45.280 --> 29:52.280]  Please give us a call, get in line, let's talk, however you want to do it. Otherwise, I'm just going to have to keep going on and on the rest of the show.
[29:52.280 --> 30:01.280]  All right, folks, we'll be right back so y'all hang on.
[30:22.280 --> 30:28.280]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights.
[30:28.280 --> 30:34.280]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[30:34.280 --> 30:45.280]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.280 --> 30:52.280]  It's disturbing enough that big brother governments use facial recognition technology to identify and track people on the streets.
[30:52.280 --> 30:57.280]  Now clothing companies in Europe, Canada, and America are getting in on the act.
[30:57.280 --> 31:06.280]  So where do they hide the cameras? In the eyes of mannequins. That's right, those glamorous plastic ladies in the display windows may be watching you back.
[31:06.280 --> 31:16.280]  They're called eye seers, and their job is to log the age, gender, and race of passersby so retailers can devise new schemes to get you to buy.
[31:16.280 --> 31:23.280]  But hang on, aren't mannequins spooky enough already? This is taking weird science to a whole new level.
[31:23.280 --> 31:31.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.280 --> 31:38.280]  What are you thinking? Micro-plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month.
[31:38.280 --> 31:49.280]  InfUSA.org has 12 formulations of micro-plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever.
[31:49.280 --> 31:55.280]  It alkalizes, oxygenate, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products, that saves you space, time, and money.
[31:55.280 --> 32:01.280]  Call 888-910-4367 at infUSA.org.
[32:26.280 --> 32:36.280]  Former sheriff's deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.280 --> 32:41.280]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.280 --> 32:51.280]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs. the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.280 --> 32:55.280]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.280 --> 33:21.280]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:21.280 --> 33:31.280]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio with your host Eddie Craig. It is February 26, 2018. We are live tonight.
[33:31.280 --> 33:41.280]  Alright, we have the phones on. We have a couple of callers up on the board, so let's get started with the one we have here. It says Wells Fargo.
[33:41.280 --> 33:43.280]  Hello?
[33:43.280 --> 33:44.280]  Hi, can you hear me?
[33:44.280 --> 33:46.280]  I can.
[33:46.280 --> 33:48.280]  Oh, cool.
[33:48.280 --> 33:52.280]  Do you go by Wells or Fargo?
[33:52.280 --> 33:58.280]  I'm actually Tracy. This is my husband's phone number, work phone.
[33:58.280 --> 34:00.280]  Well, okay.
[34:00.280 --> 34:06.280]  We're going to shut up right there.
[34:06.280 --> 34:19.280]  But today I've been trying to figure out administrative court because the court, like municipal court, they try to say it's criminal rules and there's no statutory rules.
[34:19.280 --> 34:22.280]  But I was reading the criminal rules.
[34:22.280 --> 34:23.280]  Which state?
[34:23.280 --> 34:25.280]  The criminal rules in Mississippi.
[34:25.280 --> 34:35.280]  So in Mississippi the criminal rules say that misdemeanor traffic tickets, these rules don't apply to and they're governed by statute.
[34:35.280 --> 34:37.280]  So they're trying to use the criminal rules.
[34:37.280 --> 34:42.280]  But what I'm trying to figure out, we're trying to figure out how to use administrative rules.
[34:42.280 --> 34:43.280]  And I'm trying to understand.
[34:43.280 --> 34:44.280]  Wait a minute.
[34:44.280 --> 34:49.280]  You said that the rules you're reading say they don't apply to these particular courts.
[34:49.280 --> 34:54.280]  The rules that do apply are statutory.
[34:54.280 --> 34:56.280]  Is that what you're telling me?
[34:56.280 --> 34:57.280]  That it says?
[34:57.280 --> 34:58.280]  Yes.
[34:58.280 --> 34:59.280]  Okay.
[34:59.280 --> 35:00.280]  Yes.
[35:00.280 --> 35:07.280]  And that you are the rules it's referring to contained in.
[35:07.280 --> 35:09.280]  I'm not sure I understand your question.
[35:09.280 --> 35:18.280]  Well, it's telling you that the rules of procedure for the criminal side do not apply to traffic courts in Mississippi.
[35:18.280 --> 35:21.280]  And there's criminal procedure.
[35:21.280 --> 35:22.280]  Okay, wait, wait, wait.
[35:22.280 --> 35:23.280]  That's what I'm talking about.
[35:23.280 --> 35:27.280]  Criminal procedure are the rules I'm referring to.
[35:27.280 --> 35:28.280]  Okay.
[35:28.280 --> 35:29.280]  Okay.
[35:29.280 --> 35:35.280]  So you're looking at something that says it's not the rules of criminal procedure and the other rules apply.
[35:35.280 --> 35:37.280]  But here's the question.
[35:37.280 --> 35:45.280]  Are the rules of criminal procedure written into statute in Mississippi?
[35:45.280 --> 35:46.280]  No.
[35:46.280 --> 35:58.280]  Well, I mean, there is a Title 99, which is criminal procedure, but there's nothing that requires probable cause determination.
[35:58.280 --> 35:59.280]  Wait a minute.
[35:59.280 --> 36:00.280]  Wait a minute.
[36:00.280 --> 36:14.280]  In a criminal case, they have to have a probable cause determination because probable cause is a fundamental element of anything relating to a criminal case that's being investigated short of a confession.
[36:14.280 --> 36:15.280]  Right.
[36:15.280 --> 36:22.280]  But I'm not able to find a rule that I can invoke to say that.
[36:22.280 --> 36:23.280]  You see what I'm saying?
[36:23.280 --> 36:25.280]  You don't have to invoke a rule.
[36:25.280 --> 36:27.280]  It's part of a fundamental right.
[36:27.280 --> 36:29.280]  It's constitutionally protected.
[36:29.280 --> 36:33.280]  It's called unreasonable.
[36:33.280 --> 36:43.280]  The unreasonableness clause is what covers the necessity for probable cause.
[36:43.280 --> 36:44.280]  Okay.
[36:44.280 --> 36:45.280]  Okay.
[36:45.280 --> 36:56.280]  Anytime the government acts against the people, there has to be a reasonable purpose and basis in law for doing so.
[36:56.280 --> 36:59.280]  It can't be unreasonable.
[36:59.280 --> 37:20.280]  But in a criminal matter, it can only be reasonable according to the United States Supreme Court if there is reasonable suspicion or probable cause of criminal activity supported by articulable facts.
[37:20.280 --> 37:43.280]  In other words, to do either an investigation or anything greater than an investigation such as a warrantless arrest, the officer must have the ability to articulate specific facts that give him a reasonable basis to do either of those things.
[37:43.280 --> 37:44.280]  Okay.
[37:44.280 --> 37:45.280]  Okay.
[37:45.280 --> 37:48.280]  That's not a statutory requirement.
[37:48.280 --> 37:51.280]  That's a fundamental rights requirement.
[37:51.280 --> 37:54.280]  Well, I totally agree with you what I'm trying to...
[37:54.280 --> 38:10.280]  Don't cite the statute, cite United States Supreme Court cases on what is reasonable in a criminal case in relation to reasonable suspicion or articulable probable cause.
[38:10.280 --> 38:16.280]  Don't worry about statute because the Supreme Court opinions trump the statute.
[38:16.280 --> 38:19.280]  I agree and I do do that.
[38:19.280 --> 38:28.280]  What I was having a problem with was in the very beginning of my motion, I'm like, you know, Tracy, I want to lose this court pursuant to.
[38:28.280 --> 38:34.280]  And I was wanting a rule that all I've got is the due process clause.
[38:34.280 --> 38:39.280]  And I mean, all I can think of is constitutional provisions.
[38:39.280 --> 38:42.280]  Well, that's exactly what we're talking about.
[38:42.280 --> 38:44.280]  That's exactly what we're talking about.
[38:44.280 --> 38:59.280]  The constitutional provisions of your state constitution and your bill of rights, as well as that of the federally protected rights in the federal constitution, all go toward that reasonableness requirement, always.
[38:59.280 --> 39:16.280]  Every state constitution as well as the federal constitution says that no person may be hampered in their personal papers and effects, you know, they're protected in their personal papers and effects from any unreasonable searches or seizures.
[39:16.280 --> 39:17.280]  Okay?
[39:17.280 --> 39:18.280]  Right.
[39:18.280 --> 39:20.280]  That's in every constitution.
[39:20.280 --> 39:41.280]  So we get down to the brass tax of what is reasonable. Well, the courts have said articulable facts showing a reliable foundation for reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe that criminal conduct is afoot.
[39:41.280 --> 39:42.280]  Okay?
[39:42.280 --> 39:53.280]  So if they're treating these actions as crimes in Mississippi, then they fall under the reasonableness requirement.
[39:53.280 --> 40:08.280]  So you can say pursuant to United States Supreme Court decision in case, blah, blah, blah, as long as it's on point with what's reasonable, what's required, what's due process, et cetera, et cetera.
[40:08.280 --> 40:09.280]  Okay.
[40:09.280 --> 40:24.280]  Well, that sounds good. I guess the only other area that I'm getting stuck on is for any appeal process, and I didn't have your stuff prior to, you know, whenever I got pulled over last March.
[40:24.280 --> 40:28.280]  And so I was pulled over last March 24.
[40:28.280 --> 40:39.280]  So we're coming up on the year, and I'm not sure if we're running out of statute limitations. We would like to just go ahead and treat it as if it's a one-year statute of limitations.
[40:39.280 --> 40:49.280]  But without going through the appeal process, we're not really sure whether or not to go ahead and file a 42 without exhausting the state.
[40:49.280 --> 41:02.280]  It won't do you any good to file a Title 42 until you can prove a rights violation, which you can only do, you can only add the malicious prosecution side to it if you win the case at the state level.
[41:02.280 --> 41:17.280]  In order to bolster the support for your Title 42, my recommendation is very straightforward. If you want to be able to do malicious prosecution, you've got to win the state case, and you can't file the 42 until you've done that.
[41:17.280 --> 41:34.280]  If you're going to make that cause of action, if you're going to try to win it without winning the case in the state, then you better have a truckload of evidence to show that the case itself was unlawful at the state level, whether you won it or not,
[41:34.280 --> 41:40.280]  because the rights violation that preceded that loss cannot or unquestionable.
[41:40.280 --> 41:43.280]  Okay. Can I get your opinion on something?
[41:43.280 --> 41:57.280]  Opinions are free. Tickets. Good. So, see, tickets, they have printed codes on them, and they just checkbox it. You know, they don't write facts, they don't write anything.
[41:57.280 --> 42:10.280]  Right. That's why the ticket can't be the charging instrument. That's why the ticket can't be the complaint, because it's not verified in any way and it doesn't provide any notice to the individual.
[42:10.280 --> 42:15.280]  It states no, it makes no statement of facts accompanying the allegation.
[42:15.280 --> 42:34.280]  But check this out. Okay. So, these codes, specifically like for months, I mean, six, seven months, I asked for, you know, where's the B-51? No driver's license. You know, no answer. You know, police officers testified that she doesn't recall ever seeing a state B-51.
[42:34.280 --> 42:50.280]  Well, we found a B-51 and we found the same exact codes that are listed on that ticket within 23 CFR 3, section 1327, which cites the National Driver Register.
[42:50.280 --> 42:53.280]  Wait a minute. 26 CFR?
[42:53.280 --> 42:54.280]  23 CFR.
[42:54.280 --> 42:55.280]  Oh, okay.
[42:55.280 --> 43:04.280]  Okay. Yeah, the National Driver's Register is for the federal license requirements, and the federal license requirements are entirely commercial.
[43:04.280 --> 43:09.280]  Exactly, and they were established under 49 U.S.D. 30303.
[43:09.280 --> 43:10.280]  Right. Title 49.
[43:10.280 --> 43:32.280]  Right, and so even the DMV, prior to issuing a license, they have to choir into the National Driver Register before they can even issue a license. But my point is, is these tickets, they contain the same exact codes within the NDR, which makes this completely federal.
[43:32.280 --> 43:45.280]  Well, not necessarily. Not if the state implemented a matching code. Now, if the state is citing a federal statute, then it's not a state issue to be prosecuted.
[43:45.280 --> 43:57.280]  If they're trying to use federal statute, and that statute does not delegate authority to the state to prosecute it, then it's out of the state's hands. Hang on just a second, and we'll finish this on the other side.
[43:57.280 --> 43:58.280]  Okay.
[43:58.280 --> 44:03.280]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.280 --> 44:29.280]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:29.280 --> 44:43.280]  You'll be charged by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.280 --> 45:03.280]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.280 --> 45:19.280]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Waterloo Street, Sweet D, here in Austin, Texas, find brave new books and chase things to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.280 --> 45:38.280]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:38.280 --> 45:50.280]  That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com. Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:09.280 --> 46:29.280]  I could hear the marching feet, they're moving into the street. Did you read the news today? They say the danger has gone away, but I could see the fires still light.
[46:29.280 --> 46:40.280]  They're burning into the night. There's too many men, too many people, too many problems.
[46:40.280 --> 46:56.280]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, the call in number 512-646-1984. Alright, we are talking with Tracy in Mississippi. Alright, so let's continue on.
[46:56.280 --> 47:15.280]  Now, in relation to the federal statute, the state has to have a state implementing statute in order to get the federal jurisdiction within the state, and then the state would have to prosecute under the state statute.
[47:15.280 --> 47:30.280]  If they're not doing that... It's fine. Yeah, if they're not doing that, then you've got a jurisdictional challenge there. The state lacks authority to prosecute federal law.
[47:30.280 --> 47:35.280]  Well, the National Driver Register is only mentioned in the commercial driver's license statute.
[47:35.280 --> 47:41.280]  Well, yeah, that's because it's all it applies to. It's all it's ever applied to.
[47:41.280 --> 47:56.280]  So what I'm trying to figure out is how this prosecutor can come and bring me Mississippi penalty provisions and totally supplement or substitute these federal codes that, you know, I'm like, where's the B-51?
[47:56.280 --> 47:58.280]  You know, that's what you're charging me with here.
[47:58.280 --> 48:07.280]  Yeah, that's a problem. If the state, they can't add to the federal law. They have to implement the federal law.
[48:07.280 --> 48:18.280]  And just putting a punitive section to the federal law is not an implementation of the federal law.
[48:18.280 --> 48:33.280]  So you've got a jurisdictional challenge there that can be raised. You are prosecuting me under a federal law trying to use a state punitive statute that does not identify itself as being an implementation of the federal law.
[48:33.280 --> 48:46.280]  You guys lack any jurisdiction to prosecute this, not to mention you lack the primary element of commercial use, which is what the federal law covers.
[48:46.280 --> 48:47.280]  Right.
[48:47.280 --> 48:59.280]  So file a notice of removal. Get it moved to federal court raising the issue that the state is attempting to prosecute a federal law without jurisdiction.
[48:59.280 --> 49:06.280]  Well, I believe that there was a 30-day limit after finding that it's a federal question.
[49:06.280 --> 49:15.280]  Not if the state's committing fraud to retain jurisdiction. Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time.
[49:15.280 --> 49:19.280]  Subject matter jurisdiction, that is.
[49:19.280 --> 49:27.280]  So they can't put a 60-day or 30-day or five-day limitation on challenging jurisdiction.
[49:27.280 --> 49:30.280]  Okay.
[49:30.280 --> 49:41.280]  All right. And I was trying to look at taxes because I wanted to understand whether or not, you know, they're calling all those privileged tax there.
[49:41.280 --> 49:46.280]  I know that they're doing it in Tennessee. They're doing it in Mississippi.
[49:46.280 --> 49:58.280]  I want to get through all the states and find out, you know, which states they're calling this a privileged tax because in Tennessee they're specific. A privileged tax is, you know, business occupation, vocation, et cetera.
[49:58.280 --> 49:59.280]  Exactly.
[49:59.280 --> 50:09.280]  The motor vehicle tax is a privileged tax. And then in another statute in Tennessee, they're saying that the registration constitutes a privileged tax.
[50:09.280 --> 50:13.280]  And a privileged tax is for-profit activity affecting a public interest.
[50:13.280 --> 50:14.280]  Right.
[50:14.280 --> 50:16.280]  It's in the box. It's in the case.
[50:16.280 --> 50:24.280]  You're using private property for commercial purposes to conduct business upon the public highways. That's the privileged tax.
[50:24.280 --> 50:33.280]  That's what registration... See, here in Texas, registration was originally toted to the people as a means to recover stolen cars.
[50:33.280 --> 50:34.280]  Okay?
[50:34.280 --> 50:52.280]  For a small fee, you could register your car, your private car with the state, okay, in order to have its information, its serial numbers recorded, and thus easier to track down if they happen to find it somewhere and they could contact you about it.
[50:52.280 --> 50:56.280]  But it was never mandatory that the people do that.
[50:56.280 --> 51:03.280]  The only mandatory registration requirement in Texas law was for state-owned vehicles.
[51:03.280 --> 51:08.280]  The state had to own it before registration was mandatory.
[51:08.280 --> 51:12.280]  But they have treated it for decades as if it was mandatory on everybody.
[51:12.280 --> 51:15.280]  But the state owns it as soon as you apply for a title.
[51:15.280 --> 51:18.280]  No, not true. Not true.
[51:18.280 --> 51:19.280]  Okay.
[51:19.280 --> 51:21.280]  Okay.
[51:21.280 --> 51:22.280]  Okay.
[51:22.280 --> 51:23.280]  Okay.
[51:23.280 --> 51:33.280]  The state has a vested interest in it as protector of an agreement, and you know why?
[51:33.280 --> 51:34.280]  No, but...
[51:34.280 --> 51:37.280]  Because the title is a negotiable instrument.
[51:37.280 --> 51:47.280]  It constitutes evidence of a lien against the property, which means there must be two parties involved.
[51:47.280 --> 51:54.280]  There must be the lien holder and there must be the person that the lien is against.
[51:54.280 --> 52:03.280]  The state has an interest in that to ensure the fulfillment of the contract associated with that lien.
[52:03.280 --> 52:06.280]  That's what a certificate of title is.
[52:06.280 --> 52:16.280]  If you look it up in the Business and Occupations Code, at least that's where it is here in Texas, if you look up the definition of certificate of title, it tells you straight up.
[52:16.280 --> 52:26.280]  It is a negotiable instrument used primarily for the transfer of property, just like a check.
[52:26.280 --> 52:32.280]  I mean, it's exactly the same thing as a negotiable bond or negotiable check.
[52:32.280 --> 52:34.280]  What happens when you sell someone your car?
[52:34.280 --> 52:41.280]  You sign the title and give them the title with the car, right?
[52:41.280 --> 52:42.280]  Yeah.
[52:42.280 --> 52:43.280]  Okay.
[52:43.280 --> 52:57.280]  The same thing happens if you buy something and someone's shop and you write them and sign a check over to them for X amount of money, right?
[52:57.280 --> 52:58.280]  Yeah.
[52:58.280 --> 53:07.280]  Both of those examples are examples of negotiable instruments.
[53:07.280 --> 53:18.280]  I guess I was just reading the Mississippi statute and it said that the application of title is what, pretty much, from my understanding, is what required the payment of the privilege.
[53:18.280 --> 53:19.280]  Right.
[53:19.280 --> 53:21.280]  But that's to apply for the title.
[53:21.280 --> 53:27.280]  I'm talking about what the title itself is.
[53:27.280 --> 53:28.280]  Okay.
[53:28.280 --> 53:33.280]  Okay.
[53:33.280 --> 53:51.280]  When you apply, see, the next person that takes that title that you sign over to them, they're going to go pay that same privilege tax when they apply to register that title in their name, right?
[53:51.280 --> 53:53.280]  If they choose to.
[53:53.280 --> 53:54.280]  If they choose to.
[53:54.280 --> 53:58.280]  But the thing is, of course, we know what's going to happen if they choose not to.
[53:58.280 --> 54:00.280]  But you get my point.
[54:00.280 --> 54:12.280]  Every single time someone takes that title and tries to register that property with that title under their name, they're going to get charged that privilege tax.
[54:12.280 --> 54:13.280]  Right.
[54:13.280 --> 54:19.280]  And that's fraud because they don't owe that privilege tax.
[54:19.280 --> 54:20.280]  Right.
[54:20.280 --> 54:21.280]  No, absolutely.
[54:21.280 --> 54:22.280]  I totally agree.
[54:22.280 --> 54:29.280]  And I wish that, you know, so many more people could hear that and it definitely makes me angry.
[54:29.280 --> 54:33.280]  Well, that's part of what I was running on a charade about at the beginning of the show.
[54:33.280 --> 54:46.280]  The reason I do what I do here is to give out the information so people will go check it and verify it and see for themselves that I'm not incorrect and get pissed off enough to start asking questions and doing something.
[54:46.280 --> 54:47.280]  So I agree.
[54:47.280 --> 54:51.280]  If more people knew, this wouldn't be allowed to continue.
[54:51.280 --> 54:54.280]  Hence the reason I'm upset.
[54:54.280 --> 54:59.280]  Well, you know, I believe the problem is that everybody's relying on the government.
[54:59.280 --> 55:05.280]  I mean, everybody's working to barely make ends meet and nobody can afford to go to jail.
[55:05.280 --> 55:06.280]  Nobody can afford to go to jail.
[55:06.280 --> 55:10.280]  Yeah, but see, the whole system is set up to make that the option.
[55:10.280 --> 55:21.280]  They have literally given us at every turn a Hobson's choice or Sophie's choice or however many other choices that we set up over the years to make.
[55:21.280 --> 55:23.280]  Either way, it's a catch-22.
[55:23.280 --> 55:25.280]  You're screwed one way, you're screwed the other way.
[55:25.280 --> 55:27.280]  It doesn't matter.
[55:27.280 --> 55:28.280]  That's right.
[55:28.280 --> 55:30.280]  And they have set it up that way intentionally.
[55:30.280 --> 55:41.280]  This goes back to the progressive Democrats and the attorneys working hand in hand to undermine individual rights and destroy everything in this country to benefit themselves.
[55:41.280 --> 55:48.280]  And that's where we're at because that's how this has been arranged to work.
[55:48.280 --> 55:49.280]  That's right.
[55:49.280 --> 55:54.280]  I'm really, really sad and I definitely cry very often.
[55:54.280 --> 55:56.280]  Join the club.
[55:56.280 --> 55:58.280]  I want to, I want to just stop.
[55:58.280 --> 56:00.280]  No, I don't want to read tape law anymore.
[56:00.280 --> 56:01.280]  I want to quit.
[56:01.280 --> 56:02.280]  I want to drive a license.
[56:02.280 --> 56:07.280]  I'm going to tag and I'm going to the zoo and anyway.
[56:07.280 --> 56:08.280]  All right.
[56:08.280 --> 56:18.280]  Well, I don't want to take up all your time and I appreciate the chat and we'll re-wist into this and I need to understand these.
[56:18.280 --> 56:21.280]  I guess I need to understand administrative procedure.
[56:21.280 --> 56:28.280]  Well, again, what I was saying is you're looking at using administrative procedure, but you haven't verified that that's the correct procedure.
[56:28.280 --> 56:39.280]  You're saying that the criminal rules that we started talking about at the beginning said that the rules governing these cases for these kinds of courts are in statute.
[56:39.280 --> 56:41.280]  That's what you've got to find.
[56:41.280 --> 56:44.280]  What statute?
[56:44.280 --> 56:48.280]  Somebody has to be able to point you to those rules.
[56:48.280 --> 56:51.280]  They're not allowed to play this game one-sided.
[56:51.280 --> 56:55.280]  I know the rules and you don't because I don't have to show you what the rules are.
[56:55.280 --> 56:56.280]  That's BS.
[56:56.280 --> 57:00.280]  They do have to show you what the rules are.
[57:00.280 --> 57:09.280]  The only rules that I can find is that they have to have a sworn complaint and then I have cases that call, you know, tell us the elements of a complaint and I'm like, well, this is a complaint.
[57:09.280 --> 57:13.280]  Right, but the complaint is a criminal complaint, isn't it?
[57:13.280 --> 57:14.280]  Yes.
[57:14.280 --> 57:18.280]  Yet they're saying the criminal rules don't apply, aren't they?
[57:18.280 --> 57:19.280]  Right.
[57:19.280 --> 57:23.280]  So what rules apply?
[57:23.280 --> 57:24.280]  Exactly.
[57:24.280 --> 57:26.280]  That's what I'm trying to figure out and I have no idea how to...
[57:26.280 --> 57:30.280]  Well, don't make the assumption that it's administrative.
[57:30.280 --> 57:36.280]  Assuming is always a mistake, always.
[57:36.280 --> 57:43.280]  I mean, I was thinking, I was looking at you last time and you said that a bill of attainder is only for capital or...
[57:43.280 --> 57:44.280]  No.
[57:44.280 --> 57:45.280]  Whatever, so...
[57:45.280 --> 57:46.280]  Well, yeah.
[57:46.280 --> 57:50.280]  Well, a bill of attainder was usually a bill to be put to death.
[57:50.280 --> 57:58.280]  A bill of pains and penalties, however, is for any offense lesser than a capital offense.
[57:58.280 --> 57:59.280]  Right.
[57:59.280 --> 58:02.280]  So I need to look at the pains and penalties.
[58:02.280 --> 58:04.280]  I meant to be doing that.
[58:04.280 --> 58:16.280]  Well, the courts have all agreed that a bill of attainder prohibition is equally applicable to a bill of pains and penalties, even though it's lesser.
[58:16.280 --> 58:23.280]  So they're treated one and the same as being constitutionally prohibited.
[58:23.280 --> 58:24.280]  Okay, perfect.
[58:24.280 --> 58:28.280]  All right, well, I'll look at all this and thank you so much for your time and everything that you do.
[58:28.280 --> 58:29.280]  Yes, ma'am.
[58:29.280 --> 58:30.280]  You have a good night.
[58:30.280 --> 58:31.280]  Thanks for calling.
[58:31.280 --> 58:34.280]  All right, folks, we're about to take the top of the hour break.
[58:34.280 --> 58:37.280]  So y'all hang on and we will pick this back up on the other side.
[58:37.280 --> 58:41.280]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:41.280 --> 58:44.280]  You guys that are up there, hang on and I'll get you when we get back.
[58:49.280 --> 58:57.280]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.280 --> 59:05.280]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:05.280 --> 59:08.280]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:08.280 --> 59:17.280]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.280 --> 59:27.280]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.280 --> 59:32.280]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.280 --> 59:47.280]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.280 --> 01:00:12.280]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:12.280 --> 01:00:34.280]  Closed with gold at $1,318.52 an ounce, silver $16.39 an ounce, Texas crude $63.39 a barrel, Bitcoins at $8,127.35, theorems at $819.48, and finally Bitcoin cash is at $1,013.04 a crypto coin.
[01:00:34.280 --> 01:00:44.280]  Today in History, the year 1940, Walt Disney's second full-length animated film, Pinocchio, premieres in theaters.
[01:00:44.280 --> 01:01:00.280]  In recent news, current county California Superior Court Judge David Lampe stated in a ruling today that the Tasteries Bakery in Bakersfield indeed has the right to refuse to bake a cake for same-sex wedding, but only because the act of baking is protected under free speech,
[01:01:00.280 --> 01:01:09.280]  and more specifically, artistic expression. Judge Lampe made it clear that freedom of religion does not give a business the right to refuse service to groups protected by the Civil Rights Act.
[01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:30.280]  A retail tire shop may not refuse to sell a tire because the owner does not want to sell tires to same-sex couples. No baker may place their wares in a public display case, open their shop, and then refuse to sell because of race, religion, gender, or gender identification.
[01:01:30.280 --> 01:01:48.280]  But I cannot be part of a celebration that goes against my Lord and Savior. This ruling seems to have been perfect timing since the high-profile case of the Colorado baker Jack Phillips, who did the same by refusing to bake a wedding cake for the same-sex couple a few years back, is about to be ruled on by the Supreme Court.
[01:01:48.280 --> 01:02:06.280]  Under initiative set by Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu's government, tens of thousands of African refugees will soon be forcefully expelled from Israel, and as being reported that on Sunday, Israeli government employees began handing out some 20,000 notices informing 20,000 African men that they have two months to leave the country or risk-facing jail time.
[01:02:06.280 --> 01:02:18.280]  These unmarried men are being given two options. Go to prison or take $3,500 and be transported to a third country. With no official statements as to where that would be, it is suspected that it is most likely Rwanda.
[01:02:18.280 --> 01:02:37.280]  Some pilots and doctors, among several others, have stated that they would not cooperate with any government efforts to remove migrants. The scenario has been in place since 2005 when Egypt's crackdown on Sudanese refugees triggered the mass migration of some 60,000 Africans who crossed into Israel before the 130-mile barrier was finished in 2013.
[01:02:37.280 --> 01:02:51.280]  It has been estimated that some 20,000 have left since then. The low-star lowdown is currently due for sponsors sent upon for a service like the Advertise of us who will be giving a call at 210-363-2267.
[01:02:51.280 --> 01:03:08.280]  This is a quick roadie with your lowdown for February 7, 2018.
[01:03:21.280 --> 01:03:36.280]  This is a quick roadie with your lowdown for February 7, 2018.
[01:03:36.280 --> 01:03:52.280]  This is a quick roadie with your lowdown for February 7, 2018.
[01:03:52.280 --> 01:04:06.280]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. The call-in number is 512-646-1984. Right now, we have Tyler in Wyoming. Tyler, what can we do for you?
[01:04:06.280 --> 01:04:10.280]  Hey, Eddie. Thanks for taking my call. I appreciate your last caller there.
[01:04:10.280 --> 01:04:11.280]  Yes, sir.
[01:04:11.280 --> 01:04:16.280]  I had a couple, three questions for you. I'll try to get through this without making you too angry.
[01:04:16.280 --> 01:04:26.280]  Well, it's not that you're not who I was referring to, and the thing about it is I don't get angry unless you keep making the same dumb mistakes.
[01:04:26.280 --> 01:04:36.280]  No, I hear y'all that I meant to add as consumers, but they're not all serious. I'm not trying to frustrate you. Sometimes I do.
[01:04:36.280 --> 01:04:45.280]  Everybody does for some time. Frustrated, I'm used to. It's when I'm sitting here feeling like I've been talking to the wall the whole time that I tend to get upset.
[01:04:45.280 --> 01:04:55.280]  Sure, sure. What we're doing, this is a case where we recited, actually, my dad recited, but I'm helping him with the case for driving without a license and proof of insurance.
[01:04:55.280 --> 01:05:00.280]  They dropped the insurance. We're only fighting the driver's license ticket down.
[01:05:00.280 --> 01:05:08.280]  I'm in the process of filing or writing up a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:05:08.280 --> 01:05:20.280]  And they wrote him under, they said he had a pickup. That was the specific motor vehicle. And one thing I'm doing to prove that there's no subject matter jurisdiction is going back into the definitions.
[01:05:20.280 --> 01:05:31.280]  For example, a pickup. It says it's designed, used, or maintained for the transportation. It used that word transportation of persons and property.
[01:05:31.280 --> 01:05:38.280]  And then it also says it's... Does it, does any statute involving defined transportation?
[01:05:38.280 --> 01:05:56.280]  No, transportation is not defined in the code. Okay. And the original enactment or the current enactment, if it's a reenactment or recodification enactment of the statutes, Wyoming has a single subject clause, right?
[01:05:56.280 --> 01:06:11.280]  Yes. So, in the original legislative bill, what does the caption say, the single subject that all the statutes relating to pickups falls under?
[01:06:11.280 --> 01:06:15.280]  Okay. I haven't looked up specific pickups.
[01:06:15.280 --> 01:06:23.280]  No, no, no. You're missing the point here. I just used that because pickups is defined in the statutes you're talking about, right?
[01:06:23.280 --> 01:06:33.280]  Yes. Okay. So, is every other statute and definition in every part of the code, it will all fall under that same subject?
[01:06:33.280 --> 01:06:43.280]  It doesn't matter what you're talking about. It's going to be under that single umbrella subject. So, what is it?
[01:06:43.280 --> 01:06:45.280]  Okay.
[01:06:45.280 --> 01:06:56.280]  I just used the pickup as an example so you could say, hey, pickups related to this single subject according to the legislature, that single subject is transportation.
[01:06:56.280 --> 01:07:11.280]  In fact, it right here says that pickups are used for transportation. You can't prove transportation because transportation means the movement of persons, goods, or property from point A to point B for commercial purposes, either as a business or occupation.
[01:07:11.280 --> 01:07:26.280]  Exactly. Well, in my research back in the original documents, I think what they've done is, like with the truck and pickup truck, they used to be called, for example, back in the 20s and so forth, motor trucks.
[01:07:26.280 --> 01:07:31.280]  And what they did in the recent code is they just dropped the motor and they just put truck.
[01:07:31.280 --> 01:07:51.280]  Doesn't matter. It still falls under the same subject. It doesn't matter if they called it banana cream pie. If the single subject, the definition of banana cream pie, must relate to is transportation, it is stuck under transportation.
[01:07:51.280 --> 01:07:54.280]  I don't give a crap what they call it.
[01:07:54.280 --> 01:07:59.280]  Okay. And as for the driver's license act, that's what it's called.
[01:07:59.280 --> 01:08:08.280]  Same thing. It falls under the umbrella of whatever single subject the legislature declared covers all of them.
[01:08:08.280 --> 01:08:15.280]  Right. What it was titled back then was chauffeur and driver's license act in 47.
[01:08:15.280 --> 01:08:21.280]  Right. Of which chauffeur is the only thing that's specifically defined as a license, right?
[01:08:21.280 --> 01:08:29.280]  See, here in Texas, there was no such thing and still is no such thing as a driver's license.
[01:08:29.280 --> 01:08:40.280]  Even though the statute now has a definition for it, it completely did away with the three licenses that actually exist, which they can't do that way.
[01:08:40.280 --> 01:08:48.280]  See, in Texas, it's chauffeurs, commercial operators and operators are the only valid licenses that exist.
[01:08:48.280 --> 01:09:02.280]  When you look in Texas law, the way it's written right now, a driver's license encompasses only one of three potential temporary versions of those three licenses.
[01:09:02.280 --> 01:09:07.280]  But those three licenses are nowhere to be found now.
[01:09:07.280 --> 01:09:10.280]  You can get a temporary version of a chauffeur's license.
[01:09:10.280 --> 01:09:17.280]  You can get a learner's permit for a chauffeur's license or a commercial operator's license or an operator's license.
[01:09:17.280 --> 01:09:26.280]  You can't actually get a chauffeur's license, commercial operator's license or operator's license because there's no such thing in the law anymore.
[01:09:26.280 --> 01:09:28.280]  Okay. Yeah.
[01:09:28.280 --> 01:09:40.280]  So it's a completely baseless charge of not having a license because it is legally impossible to get the license.
[01:09:40.280 --> 01:09:47.280]  And then it's legally impossible if you're permanently domiciled in Texas to get the license without committing a felony.
[01:09:47.280 --> 01:09:58.280]  By falsifying the applications and other paperwork associated with getting the license, or at least the temporary version of the license that doesn't actually exist.
[01:09:58.280 --> 01:10:02.280]  That's a good point because you're saying you would be commercial then, right?
[01:10:02.280 --> 01:10:16.280]  No, you're saying you're a resident when you're not. You are falsely holding yourself out to be a temporary individual within the territorial borders of Texas, not a permanently domiciled individual.
[01:10:16.280 --> 01:10:22.280]  The statutes only apply to residents which are temporary.
[01:10:22.280 --> 01:10:26.280]  They're transient. They're not permanent.
[01:10:26.280 --> 01:10:29.280]  Okay.
[01:10:29.280 --> 01:10:35.280]  Yeah, how's that worded in the wording? How do you know that word says it's just like a transient or how's that worded?
[01:10:35.280 --> 01:10:43.280]  Because the courts have spent decades telling us what the difference between domiciled and residents is.
[01:10:43.280 --> 01:10:45.280]  Okay.
[01:10:45.280 --> 01:11:02.280]  I've got a whole article on that on Texas juries on my legal blog. Go up there and read the article on juries and you will see everything up there in the case law about what the differences are between domiciled and resident.
[01:11:02.280 --> 01:11:05.280]  I'll do that.
[01:11:05.280 --> 01:11:17.280]  Also, I appreciate your work with what you did with that. It's a lot of information, so it's hard to go over all of it, but I'm just trying to pick out what most applies to my case.
[01:11:17.280 --> 01:11:28.280]  Right now, you need to focus on the single subject. What did the legislature say it is? What does it actually mean? How is it defined? Does the state define it?
[01:11:28.280 --> 01:11:39.280]  Has it been defined in a law dictionary by some other case law? If it has, that case law is controlling if the state didn't make a definition for it.
[01:11:39.280 --> 01:11:49.280]  Well, I went back in here, Wyoming, and the motor vehicles, the laws, they first came up under the title of sanitary and police regulation.
[01:11:49.280 --> 01:11:57.280]  Okay. You missed my point. I don't care how the laws themselves came into existence. That is not my question or my point.
[01:11:57.280 --> 01:12:13.280]  My point is if the subject under which those laws were brought to bear is transportation, did the legislature write a definition for that into any law?
[01:12:13.280 --> 01:12:34.280]  If they did not, then where is the definition of transportation to be found so that you can then understand what the subject requirements are for all of the statutes in that code that were contained within that bill that created that code?
[01:12:34.280 --> 01:12:55.280]  Yes, and they actually did not define that term in some of the early times. Right. So here in Texas, you have Chapter 311 and 312 of the Texas Government Code that says when a term or phrase has been given a specialized or particular meaning by an industry or profession or occupation,
[01:12:55.280 --> 01:13:17.280]  then that definition is controlling and shall be used in order to understand its meaning. Well, transportation has been defined by the courts. Transportation has been defined by the occupation and profession of transportation.
[01:13:17.280 --> 01:13:21.280]  So there's no question what transportation is.
[01:13:21.280 --> 01:13:32.280]  Yeah. You've got a couple, you've got a case on that real quick where you just defined the transportation being defined by the courts. I've been reading some, but I'm curious what you think is a good one.
[01:13:32.280 --> 01:13:47.280]  Interstate Commerce Commission versus Brimson is the one that sets the standard at the federal level for what transportation is. It's right there in Black's Law 6 listed with the definition, the entire case site.
[01:13:47.280 --> 01:13:55.280]  Interstate Commerce Commission versus Brimson, B-R-I-M-S-O-N. Appreciate that.
[01:13:55.280 --> 01:13:57.280]  Yep.
[01:13:57.280 --> 01:14:09.280]  Just real quick here, there was also, I was trying to see, because I know that you say that you try to not complete, you say the citation is not a real complaint.
[01:14:09.280 --> 01:14:21.280]  And it obviously isn't. In the court rules here, though, in Wyoming, and they're criminal, it says that it just needs to be sworn to, but it needs not be under oath. But I look in the...
[01:14:21.280 --> 01:14:31.280]  Then it's not a valid statement if it's not under oath. If it's not done under oath, it is not a factual statement.
[01:14:31.280 --> 01:14:34.280]  That's what I think, but how do I prove that?
[01:14:34.280 --> 01:14:40.280]  What do you mean, how do you prove that? Is this sworn under oath? No.
[01:14:40.280 --> 01:14:47.280]  Great. But the rules wanted to get away with that. They say it doesn't need to be. So how do you challenge it, I guess, is what I'm saying.
[01:14:47.280 --> 01:14:56.280]  As a violation of due process, there is no sworn statement of facts being presented in this case to make a criminal allegation.
[01:14:56.280 --> 01:15:05.280]  Well, criminal allegations don't have to be sworn. Great. Then who is making the allegation and what personal knowledge do they have of the facts?
[01:15:05.280 --> 01:15:11.280]  This is what I keep saying about getting the cop on the stand and ask him how he reached probable cause.
[01:15:11.280 --> 01:15:18.280]  If he doesn't understand transportation, then he can't understand motor vehicle relates solely to transportation.
[01:15:18.280 --> 01:15:25.280]  He doesn't have the element of transportation, therefore he could not have had probable cause.
[01:15:25.280 --> 01:15:28.280]  Great.
[01:15:28.280 --> 01:15:37.280]  Yeah, we challenge that. And the judge here said that the transportation code, in his opinion, that's the word he used, applied to everybody.
[01:15:37.280 --> 01:15:44.280]  Well, then he needs to put that legal determination in writing so that you can challenge it in the appeal.
[01:15:44.280 --> 01:15:48.280]  Yeah, I'm going to file a finding the facts, please.
[01:15:48.280 --> 01:15:57.280]  No, you're not. You don't file findings of facts and conclusions of law. You file a motion demanding that the judge do it.
[01:15:57.280 --> 01:16:05.280]  That the judge sign a written order on his determination that the transportation code applies to everybody.
[01:16:05.280 --> 01:16:16.280]  And that in that order, you wanted to attach to a finding of facts and conclusions of law as to what law the judge specifically based that opinion on.
[01:16:16.280 --> 01:16:20.280]  Okay, so can you word that one more time?
[01:16:20.280 --> 01:16:27.280]  No, listen to the recording. Don't ever ask me to repeat myself. This stuff comes off the top of my head.
[01:16:27.280 --> 01:16:34.280]  I'm not thinking about it as I say it. It is all completely automatic. There is no way I can go back and repeat myself.
[01:16:34.280 --> 01:16:42.280]  All right, sorry, idiot. Okay, I'll do that. Just do you have time for a quick question again.
[01:16:42.280 --> 01:16:46.280]  If you'll hang on, I got this break and then we'll finish up on the other side.
[01:16:46.280 --> 01:17:13.280]  All right, folks, calling number 512-646-1984. Y'all hang on and we will be right back.
[01:17:16.280 --> 01:17:21.280]  I really don't have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help Logos?
[01:17:21.280 --> 01:17:29.280]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help Logos with ordering your supplies or holiday gifts.
[01:17:29.280 --> 01:17:34.280]  First thing you do is clear your cookies. Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:17:34.280 --> 01:17:43.280]  Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.280 --> 01:17:44.280]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.280 --> 01:17:47.280]  No. Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:47.280 --> 01:17:48.280]  No.
[01:17:48.280 --> 01:17:49.280]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.280 --> 01:17:50.280]  No.
[01:17:50.280 --> 01:17:51.280]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.280 --> 01:17:57.280]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:17:57.280 --> 01:17:58.280]  We are Logos.
[01:17:58.280 --> 01:18:00.280]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:18:00.280 --> 01:18:05.280]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.280 --> 01:18:09.280]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method.
[01:18:09.280 --> 01:18:14.280]  Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:18:14.280 --> 01:18:20.280]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statute.
[01:18:20.280 --> 01:18:26.280]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:18:26.280 --> 01:18:29.280]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:18:29.280 --> 01:18:33.280]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:18:33.280 --> 01:18:38.280]  The Michael Mearris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:38.280 --> 01:18:44.280]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:18:44.280 --> 01:18:49.280]  and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com.
[01:18:49.280 --> 01:18:57.280]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:18:57.280 --> 01:19:00.280]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:00.280 --> 01:19:10.280]  This is The Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.280 --> 01:19:40.280]  This is The Logos Radio Network.
[01:20:00.280 --> 01:20:10.280]  This is The Logos Radio Network.
[01:20:10.280 --> 01:20:20.280]  This is The Logos Radio Network.
[01:20:20.280 --> 01:20:30.280]  This is The Logos Radio Network.
[01:20:30.280 --> 01:20:40.280]  Hi folks, we are back. This is ruleoflawradio. The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[01:20:40.280 --> 01:20:43.280]  We are wrapping up with Tyler N. Wyoming.
[01:20:43.280 --> 01:20:50.280]  All right, Tyler, what else do you got?
[01:20:50.280 --> 01:20:53.280]  Well, the definition of pickup is in Chapter 1 of the Motor Vehicle Code. It's kind of like 18 chapters in it.
[01:20:53.280 --> 01:21:00.280]  And then it says in Chapter 1, this act refers to, and it goes through from Chapter 1 to Chapter 4.
[01:21:00.280 --> 01:21:06.280]  But not having a driver's license is in Chapter 7. That's where we were written up.
[01:21:06.280 --> 01:21:15.280]  Definitions still apply even though that act only goes from 1 to 4, because there is no definition separately for pickup.
[01:21:15.280 --> 01:21:19.280]  In Chapter 7, it's all commercial definitions.
[01:21:19.280 --> 01:21:28.280]  Well, if they're charging you under Chapter 7, and Chapter 7 says it specifically relates to commercial,
[01:21:28.280 --> 01:21:33.280]  then how are they saying that the definitions apply to something else?
[01:21:33.280 --> 01:21:35.280]  I don't see how it can.
[01:21:35.280 --> 01:21:41.280]  Well, there you go. It's the reason you need to be going after this judge in his so-called determination.
[01:21:41.280 --> 01:21:44.280]  I agree. I agree with what I'm trying to do.
[01:21:44.280 --> 01:21:55.280]  See, the thing is, is when a judge gives his opinion, what he is actually doing is giving a legal determination of the law.
[01:21:55.280 --> 01:22:04.280]  You have the right to demand how he came to that determination based upon what law?
[01:22:04.280 --> 01:22:12.280]  If he can't support his determination using the law, then he can't say that his determination is the law.
[01:22:12.280 --> 01:22:18.280]  Okay. Yeah, that makes perfect sense then.
[01:22:18.280 --> 01:22:22.280]  And actually, I want to rakeast him because it's only about a third of the way.
[01:22:22.280 --> 01:22:30.280]  If you can show that he had no legal basis and wished to put out that determination and he's going solely by his opinion rather than the law,
[01:22:30.280 --> 01:22:35.280]  then it's very easy to get him disqualified as being biased and prejudicial.
[01:22:35.280 --> 01:22:38.280]  Well, he even said on the hearing, not even a third of the way through, he said,
[01:22:38.280 --> 01:22:42.280]  I'm already going to vote against you, but he goes, go ahead and present your case.
[01:22:42.280 --> 01:22:47.280]  Well, there you go. You're not getting a fair and impartial trial. That's the only thing you need to raise.
[01:22:47.280 --> 01:22:54.280]  The judge said before the trial even began that he was going to find me guilty. That's not fair and impartial.
[01:22:54.280 --> 01:23:00.280]  You're right. But here's the problem. I want to get on the written record, like you said.
[01:23:00.280 --> 01:23:04.280]  Then follow written objection to what he said.
[01:23:04.280 --> 01:23:08.280]  But I want to rakeast him too. So do I file the...
[01:23:08.280 --> 01:23:17.280]  Okay. Why would you do that? Why would you rakeast him when he just got your case thrown out?
[01:23:17.280 --> 01:23:21.280]  Good point.
[01:23:21.280 --> 01:23:24.280]  You're saying stay with him and just...
[01:23:24.280 --> 01:23:28.280]  That's like giving back the winning lottery ticket.
[01:23:28.280 --> 01:23:33.280]  I hear you. So stick with the judge and just have him put in it.
[01:23:33.280 --> 01:23:40.280]  File a written objection to what he did as a rights violation. Get it into the record.
[01:23:40.280 --> 01:23:47.280]  Now on appeal, you've got it in the record that you did not get a fair and impartial trial.
[01:23:47.280 --> 01:23:51.280]  I already did that. I already did the written objection.
[01:23:51.280 --> 01:23:54.280]  Okay. Then you're good to go.
[01:23:54.280 --> 01:23:59.280]  So then just do the findings of facts and they can put that in writing, correct?
[01:23:59.280 --> 01:24:08.280]  You file a motion demanding that he give a finding of facts and conclusions of law with a signed order providing his written determination
[01:24:08.280 --> 01:24:13.280]  that the transportation code applies to everybody and not just to commercial drivers.
[01:24:13.280 --> 01:24:18.280]  And make sure that you give him an order to sign.
[01:24:18.280 --> 01:24:25.280]  That's worded the way you want it worded as long as it's legitimate.
[01:24:25.280 --> 01:24:29.280]  Okay. All right. So I'll actually put the word...
[01:24:29.280 --> 01:24:35.280]  You're going to put a proposed order with any motion you file. Always.
[01:24:35.280 --> 01:24:40.280]  Right. But won't that be in his own words? I mean, I'm not going to make...
[01:24:40.280 --> 01:24:44.280]  The conclusions of law will be in his own words.
[01:24:44.280 --> 01:24:48.280]  Yeah. And ask him to put those in writing.
[01:24:48.280 --> 01:25:08.280]  The signed order, the judge finds that the loss under those provided in the statement...
[01:25:08.280 --> 01:25:12.280]  Here we go again. Okay.
[01:25:12.280 --> 01:25:20.280]  The order simply needs to reflect that the judge is stating by his finding of facts and conclusions of law that this law,
[01:25:20.280 --> 01:25:27.280]  that the code is applicable to everyone regardless of what it actually says.
[01:25:27.280 --> 01:25:30.280]  Okay.
[01:25:30.280 --> 01:25:37.280]  Okay.
[01:25:37.280 --> 01:25:40.280]  Do you have time for one more question?
[01:25:40.280 --> 01:25:43.280]  Well, it depends. Are you going to drag that one out too?
[01:25:43.280 --> 01:25:46.280]  No. I'm not. I appreciate it.
[01:25:46.280 --> 01:25:54.280]  Yeah. It does use of citations as lawful complaint that I'm quoting from the Motor Vehicle Code Chapter 5.
[01:25:54.280 --> 01:26:02.280]  Does in the event the form of the citation provided includes information and is sworn to as required,
[01:26:02.280 --> 01:26:07.280]  it does include information. Does that mean an actual information charging document?
[01:26:07.280 --> 01:26:10.280]  Well, I don't know. I'm not in Wyoming. That's what you need to find out.
[01:26:10.280 --> 01:26:14.280]  But the thing about it is, is it sworn under oath?
[01:26:14.280 --> 01:26:19.280]  Oath being penalty of perjury that the statements made on that citation are true and correct,
[01:26:19.280 --> 01:26:25.280]  including a statement of all necessary facts in support of the allegation being made.
[01:26:25.280 --> 01:26:28.280]  If not, then it's not a valid allegation.
[01:26:28.280 --> 01:26:34.280]  It does not provide proper and sufficient and timely notice to the accused to put on a defense,
[01:26:34.280 --> 01:26:40.280]  making the citation unlawful as a complaint, regardless of what the statute says,
[01:26:40.280 --> 01:26:45.280]  because it violates the right of notice.
[01:26:45.280 --> 01:26:48.280]  Violates the right of notice. Okay.
[01:26:48.280 --> 01:26:51.280]  So any proper notice has to be sworn to then?
[01:26:51.280 --> 01:26:54.280]  No. That's not what I said.
[01:26:54.280 --> 01:26:59.280]  The allegation to a complaint, if they're making a statement of facts,
[01:26:59.280 --> 01:27:04.280]  that this is all true, that has to be sworn to.
[01:27:04.280 --> 01:27:10.280]  Otherwise, it's just a statement with no legal authority behind it.
[01:27:10.280 --> 01:27:14.280]  Okay. Yeah, it's sworn to, but it's not under oath.
[01:27:14.280 --> 01:27:18.280]  No, then it's not sworn to. That's the whole point.
[01:27:18.280 --> 01:27:23.280]  Okay. Okay.
[01:27:23.280 --> 01:27:28.280]  There's a difference between a verified instrument and a sworn instrument.
[01:27:28.280 --> 01:27:32.280]  Verified just means one person signed it saying,
[01:27:32.280 --> 01:27:34.280]  I'm making this statement.
[01:27:34.280 --> 01:27:40.280]  The other one is saying, I saw this person be the person who says they're the right person making this statement.
[01:27:40.280 --> 01:27:43.280]  A swore statement is under penalty of perjury,
[01:27:43.280 --> 01:27:49.280]  I swear that everything made in this statement is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and ability.
[01:27:49.280 --> 01:27:56.280]  And that I have personal first-hand knowledge of everything alleged in it and can testify to saying.
[01:27:56.280 --> 01:28:04.280]  And the other person's going, yep, the person who's saying they swore that this under penalty of perjury is the person that signed it.
[01:28:04.280 --> 01:28:10.280]  That's the difference between verified and sworn.
[01:28:10.280 --> 01:28:12.280]  Okay. Okay.
[01:28:12.280 --> 01:28:16.280]  So how does the rules let them get away with just saying it just needs to be sworn?
[01:28:16.280 --> 01:28:25.280]  Again, you need to figure out how the courts are ruling on what sworn means versus verified.
[01:28:25.280 --> 01:28:26.280]  Okay.
[01:28:26.280 --> 01:28:29.280]  You're talking about Wyoming specific decisions.
[01:28:29.280 --> 01:28:34.280]  I am not versed on Wyoming specific decisions.
[01:28:34.280 --> 01:28:37.280]  Okay.
[01:28:37.280 --> 01:28:38.280]  Okay.
[01:28:38.280 --> 01:28:39.280]  Alrighty.
[01:28:39.280 --> 01:28:41.280]  I appreciate you getting to have the callers.
[01:28:41.280 --> 01:28:42.280]  I appreciate your time.
[01:28:42.280 --> 01:28:43.280]  Okay.
[01:28:43.280 --> 01:28:45.280]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:28:45.280 --> 01:28:46.280]  Have a good night.
[01:28:46.280 --> 01:28:47.280]  All right.
[01:28:47.280 --> 01:28:49.280]  Now we have Adam in Texas.
[01:28:49.280 --> 01:28:52.280]  Adam, what can we do for you?
[01:28:52.280 --> 01:28:56.280]  Hold on.
[01:28:56.280 --> 01:28:57.280]  Hey there.
[01:28:57.280 --> 01:28:58.280]  I'm here.
[01:28:58.280 --> 01:28:59.280]  All right.
[01:28:59.280 --> 01:29:00.280]  Sorry.
[01:29:00.280 --> 01:29:02.280]  I just didn't have pre-notice so I was going to be on.
[01:29:02.280 --> 01:29:05.280]  Just a few quick questions.
[01:29:05.280 --> 01:29:11.280]  What authority does the DA, if he abandons the case, what authority does he have to...
[01:29:11.280 --> 01:29:16.280]  Define what you mean by abandon.
[01:29:16.280 --> 01:29:23.280]  Refuse to pursue and hand it over to the assistant district attorney to continue to pursue, I guess.
[01:29:23.280 --> 01:29:26.280]  Then it's not abandoned.
[01:29:26.280 --> 01:29:28.280]  Okay.
[01:29:28.280 --> 01:29:32.280]  So the assistant district attorney can function just like the elected district attorney.
[01:29:32.280 --> 01:29:36.280]  Except for the signing of the information, yeah.
[01:29:36.280 --> 01:29:37.280]  All right.
[01:29:37.280 --> 01:29:38.280]  Okay.
[01:29:38.280 --> 01:29:40.280]  Thanks for that.
[01:29:40.280 --> 01:29:41.280]  Okay.
[01:29:41.280 --> 01:29:42.280]  Is that it?
[01:29:42.280 --> 01:29:43.280]  No.
[01:29:43.280 --> 01:29:44.280]  I've got a couple more right here to break the music.
[01:29:44.280 --> 01:29:45.280]  All right.
[01:29:45.280 --> 01:29:47.280]  Well, hang on and we'll finish up on the other side of the break.
[01:29:47.280 --> 01:29:48.280]  All right, folks.
[01:29:48.280 --> 01:29:49.280]  This is rule of law radio.
[01:29:49.280 --> 01:29:51.280]  Call in number 5126461984.
[01:29:51.280 --> 01:29:53.280]  We've got two segments to go.
[01:29:53.280 --> 01:29:56.280]  So if you want to call, now's the time to get in line.
[01:29:56.280 --> 01:29:57.280]  Don't wait till the last minute.
[01:29:57.280 --> 01:29:59.280]  We will be right back.
[01:29:59.280 --> 01:30:04.280]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number,
[01:30:04.280 --> 01:30:05.280]  and date of birth.
[01:30:05.280 --> 01:30:08.280]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:30:08.280 --> 01:30:11.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:38.280 --> 01:30:42.280]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:08.280 --> 01:31:09.280]  And that's pretty rare.
[01:31:09.280 --> 01:31:14.280]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:14.280 --> 01:31:16.280]  It's like exercising a muscle.
[01:31:16.280 --> 01:31:18.280]  It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:31:18.280 --> 01:31:20.280]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:20.280 --> 01:31:23.280]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.280 --> 01:31:37.280]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:37.280 --> 01:31:39.280]  It says the fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.280 --> 01:31:44.280]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.280 --> 01:31:47.280]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:47.280 --> 01:31:49.280]  And thousands of my fellow force responders have died.
[01:31:49.280 --> 01:31:51.280]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.280 --> 01:31:52.280]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.280 --> 01:31:53.280]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:53.280 --> 01:31:54.280]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.280 --> 01:31:56.280]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.280 --> 01:31:57.280]  We're Americans.
[01:31:57.280 --> 01:31:59.280]  And we deserve the true go-to.
[01:31:59.280 --> 01:32:01.280]  Rememberbuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.280 --> 01:32:04.280]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:04.280 --> 01:32:07.280]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:07.280 --> 01:32:10.280]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails.
[01:32:10.280 --> 01:32:12.280]  But good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:12.280 --> 01:32:14.280]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails.
[01:32:14.280 --> 01:32:15.280]  But I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.280 --> 01:32:17.280]  That's why you have insurance.
[01:32:17.280 --> 01:32:22.280]  And Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:22.280 --> 01:32:27.280]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.280 --> 01:32:33.280]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:33.280 --> 01:32:39.280]  Call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.280 --> 01:32:41.280]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off.
[01:32:41.280 --> 01:32:46.280]  And we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.280 --> 01:32:51.280]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:51.280 --> 01:32:57.280]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.280 --> 01:32:59.280]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.280 --> 01:33:04.280]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:04.280 --> 01:33:33.280]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:34.280 --> 01:33:52.280]  All right folks, we are back.
[01:33:52.280 --> 01:33:54.280]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:54.280 --> 01:33:56.280]  We got a half an hour left in the show.
[01:33:56.280 --> 01:34:00.280]  And just to give you an idea of what I was talking about before with this dog I've got.
[01:34:00.280 --> 01:34:07.280]  Lawdog is standing here staring at me saying, look, dude, I want to go outside and you're still sitting on that damn microphone.
[01:34:07.280 --> 01:34:09.280]  Well, he's come to learn Monday nights.
[01:34:09.280 --> 01:34:11.280]  He's got to buy this time.
[01:34:11.280 --> 01:34:14.280]  All right, that being said, let's see if we can finish up with Adam here.
[01:34:14.280 --> 01:34:18.280]  All right, Adam, let's go.
[01:34:18.280 --> 01:34:20.280]  T-coast complaints don't have any time limit.
[01:34:20.280 --> 01:34:25.280]  I mean, you could T-coast somebody years, you know, seven years ago.
[01:34:25.280 --> 01:34:28.280]  There's no statute limitations, I guess.
[01:34:28.280 --> 01:34:37.280]  Well, there's going to be a statute of limitations on whatever you're accusing them of being able to have anything done about it.
[01:34:37.280 --> 01:34:42.280]  They're not going to act on a complaint that's seven years old or something like that.
[01:34:42.280 --> 01:34:43.280]  You can bet on it.
[01:34:43.280 --> 01:34:50.280]  But unless it's a really serious thing with no limitations on the act itself.
[01:34:50.280 --> 01:34:53.280]  Yeah.
[01:34:53.280 --> 01:34:54.280]  All right.
[01:34:54.280 --> 01:35:03.280]  Well, it took a year, but a couple of weeks ago in the mail I got from the Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct.
[01:35:03.280 --> 01:35:07.280]  I got a JP privately sanctioned.
[01:35:07.280 --> 01:35:09.280]  They wouldn't, you know, tell me exactly why.
[01:35:09.280 --> 01:35:19.280]  I can only go off of the conduct complaint, but it cannot be used as foundation to do something else.
[01:35:19.280 --> 01:35:27.280]  Well, I guess that depends on what you accused him of and how he got sanctioned.
[01:35:27.280 --> 01:35:31.280]  Yeah, well, they wouldn't say exactly why.
[01:35:31.280 --> 01:35:32.280]  And they never will.
[01:35:32.280 --> 01:35:37.280]  This is why you can't tell whether the individual was ever punished or not.
[01:35:37.280 --> 01:35:54.280]  One thing you can do is make sure that you raise that issue if you ever have to appear before that magistrate again.
[01:35:54.280 --> 01:35:59.280]  At least in that way, you don't ever have to deal with that particular judge again.
[01:35:59.280 --> 01:36:00.280]  Gotcha.
[01:36:00.280 --> 01:36:02.280]  Okay.
[01:36:02.280 --> 01:36:03.280]  All right, ma'am.
[01:36:03.280 --> 01:36:04.280]  I'll hand it off.
[01:36:04.280 --> 01:36:05.280]  Thanks.
[01:36:05.280 --> 01:36:07.280]  Thanks, sir. Thanks for calling.
[01:36:07.280 --> 01:36:08.280]  All right.
[01:36:08.280 --> 01:36:10.280]  Now we have Daniel in Texas.
[01:36:10.280 --> 01:36:13.280]  Daniel, what can we do for you?
[01:36:13.280 --> 01:36:15.280]  Yeah, good evening to you.
[01:36:15.280 --> 01:36:18.280]  First question, I have two questions if I may.
[01:36:18.280 --> 01:36:21.280]  Are you doing your Sunday classes?
[01:36:21.280 --> 01:36:22.280]  At the moment, no.
[01:36:22.280 --> 01:36:24.280]  Brave new books closed.
[01:36:24.280 --> 01:36:32.280]  And I have not got the online stuff done because I've been working trying to get all the new seminar material redone and everything.
[01:36:32.280 --> 01:36:36.280]  So I have not had time to get the classes up and going again.
[01:36:36.280 --> 01:36:37.280]  I see.
[01:36:37.280 --> 01:36:40.280]  Look forward to it when you do.
[01:36:40.280 --> 01:36:52.280]  Second question would be, is a county required to give you a jury trial even if it's an old ticket?
[01:36:52.280 --> 01:36:57.280]  If they're charging you with a crime, you always have the right to a jury trial.
[01:36:57.280 --> 01:37:05.280]  You have the right to a jury trial in any civil case that exceeds $20.
[01:37:05.280 --> 01:37:06.280]  Okay.
[01:37:06.280 --> 01:37:14.280]  And is someone telling you you can't have a jury trial?
[01:37:14.280 --> 01:37:15.280]  Yes.
[01:37:15.280 --> 01:37:16.280]  Who?
[01:37:16.280 --> 01:37:22.280]  They stand in Mason County.
[01:37:22.280 --> 01:37:24.280]  It's for an old ticket.
[01:37:24.280 --> 01:37:25.280]  How old?
[01:37:25.280 --> 01:37:27.280]  That I received.
[01:37:27.280 --> 01:37:29.280]  Oh, probably seven years old.
[01:37:29.280 --> 01:37:36.280]  There's no way they can prosecute a seven-year-old ticket unless there was an outstanding warrant from that time.
[01:37:36.280 --> 01:37:38.280]  Okay.
[01:37:38.280 --> 01:37:40.280]  And what about here in Travis County?
[01:37:40.280 --> 01:37:42.280]  In any county.
[01:37:42.280 --> 01:37:43.280]  Okay.
[01:37:43.280 --> 01:37:58.280]  What about here in Travis County where I went to go try to avoid paying the failure to appear in warrant charges or whatever charges the...
[01:37:58.280 --> 01:38:03.280]  Hello?
[01:38:03.280 --> 01:38:10.280]  Daniel, you disappeared if you can hear me.
[01:38:10.280 --> 01:38:11.280]  Okay.
[01:38:11.280 --> 01:38:12.280]  Well, that was short.
[01:38:12.280 --> 01:38:20.280]  Daniel, did you mute your phone by accident?
[01:38:20.280 --> 01:38:21.280]  Okay.
[01:38:21.280 --> 01:38:22.280]  Well, that's not helping.
[01:38:22.280 --> 01:38:23.280]  Okay.
[01:38:23.280 --> 01:38:25.280]  Let's get to Brett in Texas.
[01:38:25.280 --> 01:38:30.280]  Brett, what can we do for you?
[01:38:30.280 --> 01:38:36.280]  Hello, Brett?
[01:38:36.280 --> 01:38:42.280]  Looks like we might have lost our caller bridge here.
[01:38:42.280 --> 01:38:43.280]  All right.
[01:38:43.280 --> 01:38:44.280]  Hang on just a second.
[01:38:44.280 --> 01:38:48.280]  It looks like my caller bridge disconnected.
[01:38:48.280 --> 01:38:51.280]  Well, that's going to be a problem.
[01:38:51.280 --> 01:38:53.280]  No, it's there.
[01:38:53.280 --> 01:38:54.280]  I just don't...
[01:38:54.280 --> 01:39:01.280]  Brett, are you there?
[01:39:01.280 --> 01:39:05.280]  Okay, Daniel?
[01:39:05.280 --> 01:39:06.280]  Okay.
[01:39:06.280 --> 01:39:07.280]  Well, I don't know what is going on.
[01:39:07.280 --> 01:39:08.280]  I heard a blip.
[01:39:08.280 --> 01:39:10.280]  Daniel disappeared, and that is that.
[01:39:10.280 --> 01:39:21.280]  I see everybody on the board, but I can't get anybody raised up here.
[01:39:21.280 --> 01:39:27.280]  Well, let me see if I can get somebody on that and see what's going on.
[01:39:27.280 --> 01:39:28.280]  Okay.
[01:39:28.280 --> 01:39:30.280]  Well, that's not helping.
[01:39:30.280 --> 01:39:35.280]  All right, so I guess I'll just have to wait and see what happens if this gets fixed before the end of the show or not.
[01:39:35.280 --> 01:39:37.280]  I don't know what's going on with it.
[01:39:37.280 --> 01:39:53.280]  But in any case, yeah, in relation to a multi-year-old ticket, they only have two years to prosecute a misdemeanor case in Texas from the day the event occurred that the charge is stemmed from.
[01:39:53.280 --> 01:40:04.280]  So unless they have a warrant, if you didn't show up or whatever and they issued a warrant, then that warrant tolls the statute of limitations.
[01:40:04.280 --> 01:40:13.280]  But if there was no warrant and they never prosecuted the citation within the two-year statute of limitations, they're hosed.
[01:40:13.280 --> 01:40:15.280]  They cannot legally file a complaint.
[01:40:15.280 --> 01:40:18.280]  They cannot legally prosecute the case.
[01:40:18.280 --> 01:40:19.280]  They're stuck.
[01:40:19.280 --> 01:40:22.280]  They can't go beyond that, okay?
[01:40:22.280 --> 01:40:30.280]  So just in case, folks, if you get these old and they're almost always bogus, okay, let me back that up as well.
[01:40:30.280 --> 01:40:40.280]  You're getting these notices in the mail from this collection attorney's firm about a citation from 10 years ago.
[01:40:40.280 --> 01:40:51.280]  Odds are it's completely fraudulent, both in the fact that you never got the ticket in the first place and in the fact that they know damn good and well they can't prosecute you under that.
[01:40:51.280 --> 01:41:02.280]  So what they're trying to do is scare you by illegally telling you that they can arrest you, which is a violation of Texas law under the penal code.
[01:41:02.280 --> 01:41:05.280]  It is called simulation of legal process.
[01:41:05.280 --> 01:41:14.280]  They're illegally telling you that they can issue a warrant and have you arrested if you don't pay that old citation.
[01:41:14.280 --> 01:41:31.280]  It's a lie. It is fraud. Somebody needs to sue that damn attorney's firm because that is male fraud and that is a violation of Texas law that is a felony, okay?
[01:41:31.280 --> 01:41:33.280]  All right, let me try this again.
[01:41:33.280 --> 01:41:34.280]  The board refreshed.
[01:41:34.280 --> 01:41:39.280]  Daniel, are you there?
[01:41:39.280 --> 01:41:42.280]  Hello.
[01:41:42.280 --> 01:41:44.280]  Still no, Daniel.
[01:41:44.280 --> 01:41:48.280]  Brett, are you there?
[01:41:48.280 --> 01:41:50.280]  And no, Brett.
[01:41:50.280 --> 01:41:51.280]  Okay.
[01:41:51.280 --> 01:41:55.280]  Well, so we'll continue on then.
[01:41:55.280 --> 01:42:05.280]  So back to what I was saying at the start of the show then since I've covered as much as I've had to with the caller stuff.
[01:42:05.280 --> 01:42:16.280]  We cannot fix the problems that we're having in trying to help people get this information out there if the people are not going to take it upon themselves to do their own due diligence for where they are.
[01:42:16.280 --> 01:42:20.280]  It doesn't matter whether you're in Texas where I am and I can tell you everything you want to know.
[01:42:20.280 --> 01:42:26.280]  It's not my job to tell you everything you want to know, okay?
[01:42:26.280 --> 01:42:31.280]  I gave you the information for you to start digging and get this stuff put together.
[01:42:31.280 --> 01:42:38.280]  I wrote an entire set of materials that you can get that will tell you all of that stuff.
[01:42:38.280 --> 01:42:48.280]  I've got way too much in my plate right now than to be able to sit down and do this on an individual basis for everybody that wants it or needs it.
[01:42:48.280 --> 01:42:50.280]  I just cannot do it.
[01:42:50.280 --> 01:42:54.280]  As much as I wished I could, I can't.
[01:42:54.280 --> 01:42:56.280]  I do the best I can on this show.
[01:42:56.280 --> 01:42:59.280]  I try to get as much crammed into the two hours I'm on here as possible.
[01:42:59.280 --> 01:43:08.280]  I try to take as many callers as I can except for when we're running into issues like we're having right now with the callers not being able to talk or me bring them on the air.
[01:43:08.280 --> 01:43:14.280]  I don't know which one it is, but it ain't working nonetheless.
[01:43:14.280 --> 01:43:26.280]  But in either case, when you send me emails telling me that you don't like the way that I handled you on the radio, you need to start asking yourself,
[01:43:26.280 --> 01:43:30.280]  how did you conduct yourself on the radio?
[01:43:30.280 --> 01:43:39.280]  Did I say you were taking me off because you were taking information that I knew damn well that you had long before now and have had multiple times since?
[01:43:39.280 --> 01:43:49.280]  And you're still not listening to what I'm telling you and doing it incorrectly and then making me have to repeat myself multiple times to fix it?
[01:43:49.280 --> 01:43:52.280]  That's a problem, folks, and we need to fix that on our own.
[01:43:52.280 --> 01:43:56.280]  All right, y'all hang on, we'll be right back for the last segment.
[01:44:23.280 --> 01:44:26.280]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:44:26.280 --> 01:44:29.280]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:44:29.280 --> 01:44:33.280]  How to turn your financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.280 --> 01:44:40.280]  The Michael Mirris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.280 --> 01:44:49.280]  For more information, please visit ruleoflongradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner or email michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.280 --> 01:44:57.280]  That's ruleoflongradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:44:57.280 --> 01:45:00.280]  To learn how to stop debt collectors net.
[01:45:00.280 --> 01:45:03.280]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.280 --> 01:45:07.280]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:45:07.280 --> 01:45:13.280]  The affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[01:45:13.280 --> 01:45:15.280]  step by step.
[01:45:15.280 --> 01:45:18.280]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.280 --> 01:45:22.280]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.280 --> 01:45:27.280]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[01:45:27.280 --> 01:45:33.280]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.280 --> 01:45:38.280]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.280 --> 01:45:42.280]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.280 --> 01:45:48.280]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:48.280 --> 01:45:51.280]  prosay tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.280 --> 01:45:55.280]  Please visit ruleoflongradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:55.280 --> 01:46:13.280]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:26.280 --> 01:46:30.280]  The trial is a bone, bad as a bone.
[01:46:30.280 --> 01:46:37.280]  The bone, bone, bone, bone, bone, bone, bone, bone, bone, bone, bone, bone.
[01:46:37.280 --> 01:46:38.280]  Bad as a bone.
[01:46:38.280 --> 01:46:46.280]  I broke a thousand hearts, people I met you, I break a thousand more baby,
[01:46:46.280 --> 01:46:48.280]  people I am too.
[01:46:48.280 --> 01:46:53.280]  I want to be yours for the baby, yours and yours alone.
[01:46:53.280 --> 01:46:54.420]  I'm here to tear you down
[01:46:55.920 --> 01:46:57.660]  I've had enough
[01:46:58.200 --> 01:46:59.660]  I've had enough
[01:47:00.300 --> 01:47:03.280]  Dead, dice, hell
[01:47:03.280 --> 01:47:32.240]  Alright folks, we are back and hopefully over the break we were able to get the phone situation
[01:47:32.240 --> 01:47:39.200]  worked out. I am waiting to see here for just a minute, see whether we do or not. But in any case,
[01:47:39.200 --> 01:47:45.640]  I do apologize for Daniel getting cut off there in the middle of his question. But if he calls back
[01:47:45.640 --> 01:47:50.800]  in and gets back up on the bridge then I'll pick him back up. In the meantime while I'm waiting
[01:47:50.800 --> 01:47:58.800]  to see if any of the callers reconnect here, I'll just have to keep going. But anyway,
[01:47:58.800 --> 01:48:05.560]  don't look at us as the solution to the problems you're having. Look at us as a source of information
[01:48:05.560 --> 01:48:11.000]  that we can point you in a direction to get things going. But you've got to do the dig and
[01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:15.000]  you've got to do the research. You've got to put this stuff together because it's the only way
[01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:19.320]  you're going to learn it. It's the only way you're going to retain it so you can use it. Getting it
[01:48:19.320 --> 01:48:25.240]  directly from us and then trying to use it doesn't require you to remember anything. Doesn't
[01:48:25.240 --> 01:48:31.720]  require you to put any effort into it. Hence, it won't be as important to you and you won't integrate
[01:48:31.720 --> 01:48:37.400]  it as much as you need to. I can sit here and quote statutes and things on the top of my head
[01:48:37.400 --> 01:48:44.760]  because I had to internalize this stuff in order to use it. And if I didn't, I couldn't stand there
[01:48:44.760 --> 01:48:50.160]  in a courtroom and argue because I didn't know what I was going to be saying from moment to moment.
[01:48:50.160 --> 01:48:55.200]  If I didn't have this stuff on the tip of my tongue and ready to go, I couldn't respond when I needed
[01:48:55.200 --> 01:49:02.400]  to. It's going to work exactly the same way for you. Okay? There's no two ways about it. If you don't
[01:49:02.400 --> 01:49:08.200]  make the time and effort to learn this and internalize it, you're not going to be able to use it
[01:49:08.200 --> 01:49:15.520]  effectively. In which case, everything you're doing is going to, pardon the expression, be half-assed
[01:49:15.520 --> 01:49:22.200]  because it's not going to work like you need it to because you can't use it properly. All right?
[01:49:22.200 --> 01:49:29.000]  Okay. I got someone up on the board, Brett in Texas. Let's see if I can get to Brett. Brett,
[01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:36.160]  are you there? Hello, Eddie. Hello. All right. We're off to a start there. You got nine minutes.
[01:49:36.160 --> 01:49:43.280]  Sure. Yeah, we got it all fixed. All right. So earlier, when you were talking with someone and
[01:49:43.280 --> 01:49:53.200]  you were talking about the Brimson and Interstate Commerce Commission versus Brimson, yes. Right.
[01:49:53.200 --> 01:49:59.200]  Do you happen to know any that are for Texas? That's the United States Supreme Court case.
[01:49:59.200 --> 01:50:06.200]  Yeah, I had one judge tell me, this is Texas. Federal don't apply here. United States Supreme
[01:50:06.200 --> 01:50:16.200]  Court does. Okay. All right. So another question. When a judge says something like that to you,
[01:50:16.200 --> 01:50:24.720]  tell the judge you want that determination, that ruling in writing on a signed order and see just
[01:50:24.720 --> 01:50:34.320]  how quickly they backtrack. I'm sorry, judge. That sounds like an official judicial determination.
[01:50:34.320 --> 01:50:39.320]  Please put that into a written order accompanied by findings of facts and conclusions of law.
[01:50:39.320 --> 01:50:50.960]  And then file that same motion in writing. The motion demanding. A finding of facts and
[01:50:50.960 --> 01:50:58.320]  conclusions of law on a signed order for the judge stating that federal court opinions do not apply
[01:50:58.320 --> 01:51:09.320]  here in Texas, even though they absolutely do. All right. Great. Thank you. So I'm going to go
[01:51:09.320 --> 01:51:14.320]  ahead and use Brimson. Now, the difference is, especially when it's United States Supreme Court.
[01:51:14.320 --> 01:51:24.160]  Now, not every federal circuit applies in Texas, but the fifth circuit most certainly would. Okay.
[01:51:24.160 --> 01:51:29.920]  I see what you're saying. The ninth circuit wouldn't hold any sway over Texas, but the fifth
[01:51:29.920 --> 01:51:36.800]  circuit opinions most certainly would. Right. Because it's Texas. Yeah. It covers Texas. But
[01:51:36.800 --> 01:51:47.280]  the United States Supreme Court covers all of them. Yes. Okay. Wonderful. A light just went off in my
[01:51:47.280 --> 01:51:56.880]  head. Thank you. Went off or went on? Went on. Yeah. All right. Okay. Don't tell me I turned you
[01:51:56.880 --> 01:52:03.280]  in. I turned you back into the dark ages. That was not the goal here. Eddie, you've been, I
[01:52:03.280 --> 01:52:08.160]  appreciate it. You've been for me exactly what you talked about your hope in that you would be. And
[01:52:08.160 --> 01:52:14.560]  that is a source of information, the place to go and start my own research and kind of kick start
[01:52:14.560 --> 01:52:20.080]  me in the right direction because it's just a vast, formidable maze and jungle of mess of
[01:52:20.080 --> 01:52:25.680]  loss. And you've been able to help me understand like pieces of me, places that I should go and
[01:52:25.680 --> 01:52:30.160]  start researching. Well, good. And you're already light years ahead of most attorneys.
[01:52:34.400 --> 01:52:42.560]  See, my experience has been the attorneys don't know the law.
[01:52:42.560 --> 01:52:49.120]  They know only some judges and courts opinion about the law, but they have no clue what the
[01:52:49.120 --> 01:52:55.760]  actual law even says because the opinions don't address the actual law either. And when they do,
[01:52:56.320 --> 01:53:02.160]  the opinions are decades old and are no longer relevant to the statute that exists.
[01:53:05.760 --> 01:53:12.320]  And so the opinion for what it's worth is worthless because it no longer addresses the law
[01:53:12.320 --> 01:53:16.000]  as it is. It only addresses it as it was.
[01:53:23.120 --> 01:53:27.280]  This is the problem with star rate decisive when it is based upon
[01:53:28.160 --> 01:53:35.120]  statute. If the opinion deals with statute specifically and it's more than a legislative
[01:53:35.120 --> 01:53:46.880]  session old, that opinion is worthless if that statute's been changed. Yet they will cling
[01:53:46.880 --> 01:53:55.600]  to that opinion. They are still using an original court of criminal appeals opinion from 1958 here
[01:53:55.600 --> 01:54:01.760]  in Texas to say that a complaint alone is sufficient in a municipal and justice court.
[01:54:01.760 --> 01:54:08.960]  And that has never, ever been the law. It's never been the constitutional basis for a criminal
[01:54:08.960 --> 01:54:15.680]  allegation or complaint. The Constitution said right up front that these courts could only have
[01:54:15.680 --> 01:54:20.400]  jurisdiction if an indictment or information was filed. Nowhere is it ever allowed to complaint
[01:54:20.400 --> 01:54:25.440]  to vest jurisdiction. Nowhere. The Code of Criminal Procedure does not allow it to vest
[01:54:25.440 --> 01:54:32.080]  jurisdiction. And when the Code of Criminal Procedure in 46.0 or 45.01 did allow a complaint
[01:54:32.080 --> 01:54:37.040]  to vest jurisdiction, it was repealed as unconstitutional because the Constitution says
[01:54:37.040 --> 01:54:42.560]  that can't happen. And yet the courts continue to ignore that aspect of the Constitution saying
[01:54:42.560 --> 01:54:46.960]  it doesn't matter and we will still use just a complaint even though it's complete hearsay.
[01:54:48.240 --> 01:54:54.160]  See this stupidity when it comes to attorneys? We do it how we want to do it. We don't do it
[01:54:54.160 --> 01:55:00.400]  how the law says because we can tell you the law means and says anything we want and you will buy
[01:55:00.400 --> 01:55:06.160]  it because you've never read it. And if you did read it, you didn't understand it.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:12.160]  See that's why I'm a source of information to try to change that mindset.
[01:55:13.840 --> 01:55:19.040]  Them being stupid and stubborn doesn't change the fact that they still win the cases. How does
[01:55:19.040 --> 01:55:27.280]  that even... They don't always win. I'm proof positive they don't always win. Okay, cool.
[01:55:28.160 --> 01:55:33.360]  Well then there's hope for me yet. There's hope for anybody that will put the effort into learning
[01:55:33.360 --> 01:55:40.000]  this. If you can sit there in a courtroom and do the same thing I do by knowing everything they're
[01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:46.640]  going to do ahead of time and every way that the statute allows you to counter it and how the court
[01:55:46.640 --> 01:55:52.800]  rulings allow you to counter it, you can make their life a living hell. So much so, the one thing
[01:55:52.800 --> 01:56:02.080]  they really want to do is get rid of you. Have them dismissed? Yeah, just as fast as they possibly
[01:56:02.080 --> 01:56:09.120]  can. A good example being a young lady I helped with a... They were trying to charge her with,
[01:56:09.120 --> 01:56:22.320]  I forget, road rage. We caught them red-handed tampering with the record by dismissing her case
[01:56:22.320 --> 01:56:28.000]  two days before trial and refiling it under a new cause number without any notice to her in order
[01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:34.080]  to suppress her prior filings in the case so that they would not be part of the record on appeal
[01:56:34.080 --> 01:56:40.000]  to show what the court and the prosecution was actually doing. And we caught them red-handed
[01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:48.240]  at it the day before her trial. And we filed a motion the day before her trial that night
[01:56:49.120 --> 01:56:56.800]  calling the judge and the prosecutor organized crime that agreed and conspired to tamper with
[01:56:56.800 --> 01:57:03.680]  the record, deprive her of her right of due process and her right to notice and altered the case
[01:57:03.680 --> 01:57:10.640]  file in order to hide their corruption. They, I mean, they called her up and dismissed her case
[01:57:10.640 --> 01:57:16.720]  very first thing when we got in that courtroom that morning. She was a first or second person
[01:57:16.720 --> 01:57:27.120]  called up, we have your dismissal. So did you file that, the criminal complaints? Oh, absolutely.
[01:57:28.160 --> 01:57:32.560]  Did you file it with the court above them or how did that, where did you go to file that?
[01:57:32.560 --> 01:57:35.280]  I went straight to the district attorney's office.
[01:57:36.960 --> 01:57:40.880]  And I guess the district attorney probably called them right up and said, hey, what's going on?
[01:57:40.880 --> 01:57:44.640]  Nope. District attorney wouldn't take it. So then I took it to the grand jury and
[01:57:44.640 --> 01:57:50.160]  slid it under the door while they were in session. Because the grand jury actually met
[01:57:50.160 --> 01:57:53.600]  in the same building as the municipal court. Oh.
[01:57:53.600 --> 01:58:01.440]  Okay. All right. Anything else, Brett? Because I am out of time.
[01:58:03.600 --> 01:58:07.280]  Well, you were talking about sworn versus verified and I'd like to know where I can
[01:58:07.280 --> 01:58:11.520]  look that up so I can fight it and quote it. You're just going to have to study to find it.
[01:58:11.520 --> 01:58:17.920]  There's no specific place to find that. The difference is that anything sworn always has
[01:58:17.920 --> 01:58:25.040]  a jurorat. Anything verified does not. And a jurorat always says under penalty of perjury.
[01:58:27.680 --> 01:58:32.080]  Good deal. Thank you so much, Eddie. You're welcome. Appreciate you. Yes, sir. Thanks for calling.
[01:58:32.880 --> 01:58:37.120]  All right, folks. It's been the Money Now rule of law radio show. I do apologize for the technical
[01:58:37.120 --> 01:58:41.840]  difficulties, but at least we were able to continue on. I hope y'all had a good time on the show.
[01:58:41.840 --> 01:58:48.880]  Y'all have a good week. Good night and God bless.
[01:59:11.840 --> 01:59:16.320]  888-551-0102
[01:59:41.840 --> 01:59:48.880]  8551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:48.880 --> 02:00:09.920]  8551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.