[00:00.000 --> 00:05.920]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns.
[00:05.920 --> 00:11.680]  Markets for Wednesday the 29th of November open with gold of $1,295.52 amounts, silver
[00:11.680 --> 00:20.080]  $16.89 amounts, Texas Crude $57.99 a barrel, Bitcoin broke $10,000 and sitting at $10,278
[00:20.080 --> 00:29.840]  US dollars and Dashcoin is sitting at about 643 US Fiat.
[00:29.840 --> 00:37.400]  Today in History, the year 1963 US President Lyndon B. Johnson establishes the Warren Commission
[00:37.400 --> 00:44.120]  to investigate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
[00:44.120 --> 00:48.680]  In recent news, Trump-pointed FCC Chairman Ajit Tapai has been in the headlines lately
[00:48.680 --> 00:53.680]  with the Trump administration's decision to scrap Obama's net neutrality regulations.
[00:53.680 --> 00:57.680]  Regulations i.e. powers, government bureaucrats doubt they absolutely need in order to keep
[00:57.680 --> 01:02.800]  Internet content equally accessible to all consumers regardless of provider preferences.
[01:02.800 --> 01:06.220]  It seems many in Washington and many of those who report on such matters have failed to
[01:06.220 --> 01:11.360]  take note of one simple economic reality that is that the ISPs who decided to artificially
[01:11.360 --> 01:16.480]  block or slow down certain website traffic would lose business to providers who didn't
[01:16.480 --> 01:20.320]  and given exclusive treatment to some sites in exchange for payment is not only a standard
[01:20.320 --> 01:24.160]  business model but only makes sense considering the flow of given sites.
[01:24.160 --> 01:29.400]  Now to mention we don't recall what widespread content was being censored before the enforcement
[01:29.400 --> 01:33.760]  of the also benevolently sounding net neutrality regulation.
[01:33.760 --> 01:38.680]  During a speech at a R Street Institute event, Pai stated that quote when it comes to a free
[01:38.680 --> 01:43.080]  and open Internet, Twitter is part of the problem and that the company has a viewpoint
[01:43.080 --> 01:47.040]  that it uses that viewpoint to discriminate similar sentiments were stated towards the
[01:47.040 --> 01:51.840]  many online giants who support net neutrality stating that quote they may cloak their advocacy
[01:51.840 --> 01:56.480]  in public interest but the real interest of these Internet giants is in using the regulatory
[01:56.480 --> 02:00.640]  process to cement their dominance in the Internet economy.
[02:00.640 --> 02:05.160]  Only intensive research and an evaluation of incentives will reveal whether net neutrality
[02:05.160 --> 02:09.440]  is a chronic takeover or not.
[02:09.440 --> 02:12.720]  The Holcombe family who lost eight members including a woman who was pregnant in the
[02:12.720 --> 02:17.120]  mass church shooting in First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas has filed a
[02:17.120 --> 02:21.840]  wrongful death claim against the U.S. military claiming that the Air Force's negligence led
[02:21.840 --> 02:24.520]  to the gunman being able to acquire his weapons.
[02:24.520 --> 02:29.240]  The Air Force did admit that findings by Inspector General confirmed that proper personnel at
[02:29.240 --> 02:34.320]  home in Air Force Base did not report lawfully required information to civilian law enforcement
[02:34.320 --> 02:38.760]  in regards to the perpetrator's domestic violence case, a case that if reported would
[02:38.760 --> 02:40.800]  have barred him from potentially buying firearms.
[02:40.800 --> 02:47.200]  The long-stared lowdown is currently being dispossessed, so if applied to a service desk
[02:47.200 --> 02:54.240]  to advertise with us, feel free to give any call at T10 363 2257, this is Brooke Rody with
[02:54.240 --> 03:24.080]  the lowdown for November 29, 2017.
[03:24.080 --> 03:50.840]  feel free to give any calls at T10 365 2257.
[03:50.840 --> 03:56.800]  Profiting off of polity and court of politics supporting prison economy. Yeah, no one makes money when the violence stops
[03:56.800 --> 04:00.760]  Hatin's mentality is the way to make a criminal crock. Blood in the gutters out of rich
[04:00.760 --> 04:02.260]  What are they credit at the top?
[04:02.260 --> 04:05.260]  Netflix is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:05.260 --> 04:07.260]  This is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:07.260 --> 04:10.260]  This is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:10.260 --> 04:11.260]  This is what happens when you call the cops.
[04:11.260 --> 04:16.260]  Good evening. This is the Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig.
[04:16.260 --> 04:21.260]  It is, dang, man, we are getting in there, ain't we?
[04:21.260 --> 04:26.260]  It is February 19th, 2018. I am live tonight.
[04:26.260 --> 04:36.260]  If you did not get a Facebook event post, it's because I am in Facebook jail for posting a completely harmless picture,
[04:36.260 --> 04:43.260]  but someone complained about it and I got banned for three days, so I can't post or comment nor set off events.
[04:43.260 --> 04:50.260]  So, I apologize for those that are listening that would normally use the Facebook event to see what was going on.
[04:50.260 --> 04:52.260]  I couldn't make one this round.
[04:52.260 --> 05:05.260]  Alright, now, there is something that I received in the email that I would like to basically take a poll about, I guess, is the best way to put it.
[05:05.260 --> 05:14.260]  But I am getting lots of compliments on the new music, especially the opening song, and then I am also getting some complaints about the opening song.
[05:14.260 --> 05:23.260]  I got an email from somebody talking about how they referred some people to the show who were cops and other professional people,
[05:23.260 --> 05:28.260]  but they didn't get past the song that opens the show.
[05:28.260 --> 05:35.260]  And that, of course, is not something that I can help.
[05:35.260 --> 05:41.260]  If they're the kind of individual that isn't willing to take into consideration the reality of what's happening,
[05:41.260 --> 05:46.260]  I'm not really sure that listening to my show would do a whole lot to improve that form.
[05:46.260 --> 05:57.260]  But the fact is, if they aren't willing to look at the possibility that there's something seriously wrong with every avenue that we're having to deal with as the people these days,
[05:57.260 --> 06:06.260]  including the cops, including the courts, including the legislatures, including every office in the executive branch where there are bureaucratic buffoons,
[06:06.260 --> 06:13.260]  and people that just think that they are the ones that are in charge.
[06:13.260 --> 06:29.260]  That song was specifically chosen by me because I feel that it goes very well with the motif of the show, which is bring out the truth,
[06:29.260 --> 06:36.260]  no matter who it pisses off, and be real about it.
[06:36.260 --> 06:47.260]  And that song is one of the most real out there today because it is dead on with how so many of these cops act, behave, and believe.
[06:47.260 --> 06:54.260]  And I know they'll tell you to your face otherwise, but their actions say they're liars, okay?
[06:54.260 --> 07:04.260]  So if you're the kind of person that you avoided listening to any other part of the show simply because you didn't like the opening soundtrack,
[07:04.260 --> 07:14.260]  then I'm not really sure you would want to hear the truth of what's in the show to begin with, regardless of how nice I was about saying it.
[07:14.260 --> 07:23.260]  Of course, you know, for me, being nice about saying someone's a crook, a criminal, and corrupt, saying it nicely is not my forte.
[07:23.260 --> 07:33.260]  That's one of the places where Randy blesses soul, and I differ a great deal on how things should be remedied.
[07:33.260 --> 07:40.260]  I don't think just like what they tried to do with us when they passed a law saying that you cannot profit from your crimes,
[07:40.260 --> 07:46.260]  even when what you did is not really a crime, but they made it a crime.
[07:46.260 --> 07:54.260]  And if you made anything from it or anything after they criminalized it, they take whatever you had and keep it for themselves.
[07:54.260 --> 08:01.260]  So I, for one, don't think these people should get the profit from their crimes.
[08:01.260 --> 08:06.260]  I want these rogue public servants in prison.
[08:06.260 --> 08:13.260]  I want every dollar they've ever collected on the job recouped and refunded to the people.
[08:13.260 --> 08:24.260]  I want every piece of property they've ever purchased with their illegally gotten money auctioned off and sold to whoever will bid on it,
[08:24.260 --> 08:27.260]  and that money returned to the public.
[08:27.260 --> 08:36.260]  They should not profit from their crimes either, but they are, day in and day out.
[08:36.260 --> 08:46.260]  Hell, Austin cops get paid more in a starting salary than most of the people I know.
[08:46.260 --> 08:52.260]  I mean, starting salary here in Austin is 80-some-odd thousand dollars for a cop.
[08:52.260 --> 09:00.260]  If you've been here for X number of years, it's over 100,000, and it does not include the overtime, which is time and a half,
[09:00.260 --> 09:09.260]  that you get to collect by writing illegal citations and then taking your overtime to go to court and testify and all this.
[09:09.260 --> 09:14.260]  Hell, you want a good Christmas in Austin or in Texas pretty much anywhere as a cop?
[09:14.260 --> 09:22.260]  All you got to do to ensure a good Christmas or a good vacation is to write a ton of citations a few months before you're ready to go.
[09:22.260 --> 09:35.260]  By the time you get done going to court and getting paid all that overtime, you would have upped your pay by damn near 50% for the entire year to go on vacation or spend for Christmas.
[09:35.260 --> 09:48.260]  That's all you have to do to increase your net income at home is to write a traffic ticket so that you get paid overtime to go to court and testify.
[09:48.260 --> 09:51.260]  Astounding, isn't it?
[09:51.260 --> 10:04.260]  This is just one of the many things that those that are in charge tend to overlook about the abuses that this system runs on, that drives it.
[10:04.260 --> 10:07.260]  And that's just one of many.
[10:07.260 --> 10:12.260]  But when you really sit down and think about it, you ask the cop when he's on the stand.
[10:12.260 --> 10:16.260]  So, Oscar, are you being paid hourly?
[10:16.260 --> 10:18.260]  Are you soured?
[10:18.260 --> 10:20.260]  Well, I get paid by the hour.
[10:20.260 --> 10:23.260]  So that means you get overtime paid too, correct?
[10:23.260 --> 10:24.260]  Yes.
[10:24.260 --> 10:31.260]  While you're sitting here in court testifying against me today, are you drawing time and a half?
[10:31.260 --> 10:35.260]  Talk about a biased witness.
[10:35.260 --> 10:42.260]  Talk about someone who was willing to do whatever it takes to get his butt in that chair.
[10:42.260 --> 10:46.260]  You see the problem?
[10:46.260 --> 10:52.260]  And if you don't see it, I don't know how you could miss it, but there it is.
[10:52.260 --> 11:06.260]  And so, you know, I don't choose the things that I say or do on this show with the intent of alienating anyone.
[11:06.260 --> 11:10.260]  The simple facts are the facts.
[11:10.260 --> 11:18.260]  If you take Umbridge with something I'm saying on this show about a particular career or a particular profession,
[11:18.260 --> 11:24.260]  knowing full well that I'm not lying and I'm not making it up,
[11:24.260 --> 11:32.260]  and it's extremely logical, what I'm saying is the result when I'm talking about it.
[11:32.260 --> 11:45.260]  Why would you have any real reason to get upset and have a problem with what I'm saying unless you don't like the truth?
[11:45.260 --> 11:59.260]  And there's this thing about it is a dangerous thing to speak truth to power,
[11:59.260 --> 12:10.260]  but I guess I have a different understanding of who actually holds that power.
[12:10.260 --> 12:15.260]  There are those who are using it, but they don't rightfully hold it.
[12:15.260 --> 12:22.260]  There are those who are abusing it, but they don't rightfully wield it.
[12:22.260 --> 12:31.260]  And the problem is, is these two people are either A, working hand in hand with each other,
[12:31.260 --> 12:37.260]  or B, they are the same person.
[12:37.260 --> 12:42.260]  Now, I came to Austin coming up on 10 years ago.
[12:42.260 --> 12:46.260]  I never for the love of Pete thought I'd be in this town this long.
[12:46.260 --> 12:48.260]  I hate living in a city.
[12:48.260 --> 13:00.260]  I have always hated living in a city, but it turns out that if you want to truly understand a pig,
[13:00.260 --> 13:04.260]  you've got to live in a pen with them for a while.
[13:04.260 --> 13:07.260]  You've got to see what motivates them.
[13:07.260 --> 13:13.260]  They're not really hard to figure out, but to really understand them, you've got to spend some time with them.
[13:13.260 --> 13:15.260]  Well, here I am.
[13:15.260 --> 13:19.260]  I am here because this is where the legislature is.
[13:19.260 --> 13:23.260]  I am here because this is where the pigs gather.
[13:23.260 --> 13:25.260]  This is their feeding trough.
[13:25.260 --> 13:40.260]  This is where they come to when they want to write a law or a rule or create an agency that benefits either themselves or those who got them the office.
[13:40.260 --> 13:42.260]  Okay?
[13:42.260 --> 13:47.260]  Now, is that true for everyone?
[13:47.260 --> 13:48.260]  I don't know.
[13:48.260 --> 13:50.260]  I don't know every last one of them.
[13:50.260 --> 13:58.260]  What I can say is it's true for every one of them I've ever personally met.
[13:58.260 --> 14:00.260]  Okay?
[14:00.260 --> 14:19.260]  Now, one of them I have ever met has considered that this is their only term in office and are willing to do whatever they have to do while they're here to do what's right, even if it's their only term in office.
[14:19.260 --> 14:25.260]  But instead, they all come here looking for the next election.
[14:25.260 --> 14:38.260]  So they wheel and they deal and they do things they shouldn't in order to garner favor and get votes and stay in office.
[14:38.260 --> 14:43.260]  Now, in Texas, the legislature doesn't get paid.
[14:43.260 --> 14:45.260]  Okay?
[14:45.260 --> 14:49.260]  It's considered an honor to serve in the legislature and do this.
[14:49.260 --> 15:00.260]  But the thing about it is those that are serving in the legislature are people who make money hand over fist outside the legislature a lot of times.
[15:00.260 --> 15:05.260]  Because we know most of them are attorneys, they can just outright steal it.
[15:05.260 --> 15:09.260]  So they're living pretty high on the hog by stealing to begin with.
[15:09.260 --> 15:24.260]  But then they write laws that benefit themselves, their clients, and their future clients that are either going to give them their business in their law firm when they're no longer in the legislature,
[15:24.260 --> 15:43.260]  or that the attorneys got some big fat, cushy, golden parachute job waiting on them when they do leave the legislature because of the laws they wrote to help that company out before they left.
[15:43.260 --> 15:49.260]  They all talk about how much they're there to help us.
[15:49.260 --> 16:00.260]  But everything they put into law proves that is a lie.
[16:00.260 --> 16:11.260]  How many of the bills that you see coming due in the legislature are slated to put an end to property taxes?
[16:11.260 --> 16:27.260]  Are slated to put an end to restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms? That are slated on putting an end to allowing our municipalities to act as if they are the legislature?
[16:27.260 --> 16:39.260]  How many of them are bills to stop the judiciary from rewriting the law in order to suit the outcome they want?
[16:39.260 --> 16:47.260]  How many of them are bills to prevent attorneys from holding public office?
[16:47.260 --> 16:53.260]  They're not here to help us, folks. Don't even think they are because they're not.
[16:53.260 --> 17:00.260]  Alright, y'all hang on. We'll be right back after this break.
[17:00.260 --> 17:09.260]  Dang, Cookie. Cookie? Me's off, Cookie. Oh, hi, Cookie Munchers. No, these are yucky cookies. Cookie? Yucky? No, no bad cookies.
[17:09.260 --> 17:20.260]  You can't even eat these cookies. These are cyber cookies. No candy? No. They are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer. These have apples. Really? Oh, that's an actual apple.
[17:20.260 --> 17:34.260]  Hmm, yummy apple. I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash. I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them. Bye-bye, yucky cookies.
[17:34.260 --> 17:48.260]  Now, I go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies. No cookies for me.
[17:48.260 --> 17:57.260]  Consider it an early Christmas present and every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio network too.
[17:57.260 --> 18:22.260]  He is for Cookie. And it's a classic bite.
[18:22.260 --> 18:33.260]  Second place, Taurus PT111 G2 9mm Pistol from Defense Distributed. Third place, the AR308 80% lower. Fourth place, the AR15 80% lower.
[18:33.260 --> 18:42.260]  From Fat Sal's Deli, fifth place, $100 gift card for Fat Sal's Deli. Every $25 donation is a chance to win. That's LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[18:42.260 --> 18:54.260]  Also, if you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal101, you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar, get 10 chances to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[18:54.260 --> 19:00.260]  Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[19:00.260 --> 19:12.260]  If you are listening to the LogosRadio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:30.260 --> 19:50.260]  Alright folks, we are back. This is a Monday Night Rule of Law radio show with your host Eddie Craig. It is February 19th, 2018. We are live tonight.
[19:50.260 --> 20:06.260]  And again, my apologies for not being able to post an event on Facebook, but right now I'm blocked and cannot do that. So if there's anyone from Facebook that normally looks at the event that may be listening now, just post a comment up there and let folks know that, hey, I would have posted an event, but I can't.
[20:06.260 --> 20:30.260]  Alright, now that being said, I have turned on the phones. The call in number is 512-646-1984, if y'all want to call and get in line. But while I'm waiting on callers, I'm going to continue on this little diatribe here about our so-called government and how it abuses the power that we allow it to exercise.
[20:30.260 --> 20:54.260]  See, there is this thing called delegated powers. Now he who delegates a power has every right to take that power away from the one he delegated it to if the person fails in the performance of the duty related to the delegation.
[20:54.260 --> 21:10.260]  Once that power is delegated, the person is delegated to does not get to claim it as their own and keep it forever. It's not the way a delegated power works.
[21:10.260 --> 21:38.260]  I give it to you, I can take it away from you. And because I can take it away from you, it's not yours. It was never yours. And you may not use that power in any manner outside of the parameters I established as the conditions for its use.
[21:38.260 --> 22:00.260]  Nor can I empower you to use it in a way that I myself cannot use it. For instance, if I gave you the delegated power to write a check from my bank account and put you on the signature card,
[22:00.260 --> 22:12.260]  I do not delegate and the delegation of power specific to let's say I'm going to be out of the country and I need you to make sure that my mortgage gets paid every month.
[22:12.260 --> 22:24.260]  So I am leaving that within your authority to write the check and that comes out of my account to make sure that that happens. I know there's other ways to do it, but that's not the point here.
[22:24.260 --> 22:43.260]  So that is the limit of what you can write checks from my account for to pay the mortgage. Any other usage requires express permission from me because it's not in the originally delegated authority.
[22:43.260 --> 22:57.260]  And even if I give you that permission at some future point to do something different, you do not get to automatically presume that you can always do that different thing.
[22:57.260 --> 23:10.260]  Again, in order for you to do that other thing regularly or more than once, I would once again need to delegate the authority to you to do that.
[23:10.260 --> 23:14.260]  And if I don't, it's not yours to do.
[23:14.260 --> 23:22.260]  Now what that means is you cannot use my bank account in a way that I cannot use my bank account.
[23:22.260 --> 23:28.260]  You can't write a $3 million check to buy yourself a house in Beverly Hills.
[23:28.260 --> 23:39.260]  You can't even write a $3 million check to buy a house in Beverly Hills and put it in my name because I did not authorize that use of my money.
[23:39.260 --> 23:50.260]  See, when you take that delegated power and you use it outside of the parameters of the delegation, you're acting criminally.
[23:50.260 --> 24:02.260]  Why? Because you are taking something that is not yours and using it as if it is to your benefit and my detriment.
[24:02.260 --> 24:15.260]  Okay? So given that, how do our legislators think that the delegated powers we gave them, they can turn around and use to harm us?
[24:15.260 --> 24:39.260]  Which they do by hiring criminals as cops and making the world's biggest legalized street gang who may kill at will as long as they either yell, stop resisting or drop the gun first, even if you're doing neither and have no gun.
[24:39.260 --> 24:51.260]  They steal our money through a method of taxation that we did not give them the power to use because we don't have the power to use it.
[24:51.260 --> 25:00.260]  And they convert our property into rental property by doing so.
[25:00.260 --> 25:07.260]  Something else we did not authorize them to do with the delegated power.
[25:07.260 --> 25:17.260]  So how is this not something they can figure out on their own?
[25:17.260 --> 25:21.260]  Well, they don't care is the best answer I can give you.
[25:21.260 --> 25:31.260]  They simply don't care because they know that you can't reach out personally and touch them and hold them accountable for anything they do.
[25:31.260 --> 25:40.260]  Even when it's unlawful, it's unconstitutional and it violates the very promise they made to you when you elected them.
[25:40.260 --> 25:55.260]  And see, the thing is, when you elect them to do something special for you, you elect them to do something harmful to someone else who doesn't want that thing you elected them for to be done.
[25:55.260 --> 26:01.260]  And that's something that you don't have the power to give to someone else either.
[26:01.260 --> 26:13.260]  You see, if you can't go take your neighbor's property, then you can't give someone else the power to go take your neighbor's property.
[26:13.260 --> 26:25.260]  But that logic is lost on the trained monkeys that we put in the legislature because logic on an attorney in general is completely lost.
[26:25.260 --> 26:39.260]  And if you don't believe that, argue common sense with one and you'll find out just how quickly logic leaves the room because they have none.
[26:39.260 --> 26:46.260]  Their job is to distort reality through words.
[26:46.260 --> 26:59.260]  That is exactly what the job description of an attorney is, to distort reality through the use of words.
[26:59.260 --> 27:10.260]  That's why people who commit crimes are found to be the victim instead of the actual victim.
[27:10.260 --> 27:18.260]  A woman gets raped and the attorney has to make sure that the woman is shown to be the one who asked for it, even if she didn't.
[27:18.260 --> 27:26.260]  And I know there are those who do and I know there are those who make false allegations, but you're still not getting the point here.
[27:26.260 --> 27:51.260]  In Henry Clinton's case, that's one of the perfect examples where this man that she helped get off and knew he was guilty got him off from raping a little girl and laughed about it because she made the little girl out to be the one that wanted to have sex with the older man.
[27:51.260 --> 27:57.260]  I'm not talking little girls in 16, 17, I'm talking seven, eight or nine.
[27:57.260 --> 28:05.260]  I forget exactly what the age is, but it was single digit age.
[28:05.260 --> 28:15.260]  And that's the woman that wanted to be your president the past election and that's the woman that still wants to be your president at the next election.
[28:15.260 --> 28:22.260]  People don't care about you and I at all.
[28:22.260 --> 28:33.260]  Your vote doesn't really even matter to them because like I said before, the president is not elected by popular vote.
[28:33.260 --> 28:52.260]  It has been and shouldn't be because that is a democracy which we absolutely do not want when it comes to putting power in the hands of one individual in the top most office in the land.
[28:52.260 --> 28:57.260]  It's mob rule then.
[28:57.260 --> 29:19.260]  The thing is these people day in and day out, they do the same thing over and over and over and yet people just ignore it as if it's normal, as if it's proper, as if it's what they were put there to do.
[29:19.260 --> 29:25.260]  And those people worry the living hell out of me.
[29:25.260 --> 29:38.260]  If it was possible to move to a different planet on my own, I would do it tomorrow because this one is going absolutely bat crap crazy.
[29:38.260 --> 29:52.260]  And it's getting worse every single day because there's not enough good people out there standing up and saying no more.
[29:52.260 --> 30:00.260]  Alright folks, we got another break. Y'all hang on and we'll start with the callers when I get back.
[30:00.260 --> 30:06.260]  I only have eyes for you.
[30:06.260 --> 30:12.260]  Soon Storm Anakin's may be singing that tune. They're being outfitted with cameras to watch us while we shop.
[30:12.260 --> 30:16.260]  And Dr. Catherine Albrecht back with details after this.
[30:16.260 --> 30:22.260]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.260 --> 30:27.260]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.260 --> 30:35.260]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.260 --> 30:42.260]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[30:42.260 --> 30:45.260]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.260 --> 30:52.260]  It's disturbing enough that big brother governments use facial recognition technology to identify and track people on the streets.
[30:52.260 --> 30:57.260]  Now clothing companies in Europe, Canada and America are getting in on the act.
[30:57.260 --> 31:01.260]  So where do they hide the cameras? In the eyes of mannequins.
[31:01.260 --> 31:06.260]  That's right, those glamorous plastic ladies in the display windows may be watching you back.
[31:06.260 --> 31:15.260]  They're called eye-seers and their job is to log the age, gender and race of passersby so retailers can devise new schemes to get you to buy.
[31:15.260 --> 31:22.260]  But hang on, aren't mannequins spooky enough already? This is taking weird science to a whole new level.
[31:22.260 --> 31:38.260]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:52.260 --> 32:01.260]  The job of 10 products that saves you space, time and money. Call 888-910-4367 only at USA.org.
[32:22.260 --> 32:26.260]  It's an expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.260 --> 32:36.260]  Former Sheriff's Deputy A. Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold reports to the rule of law.
[32:36.260 --> 32:41.260]  You can get your own copy of this valuable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.260 --> 32:48.260]  By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar.
[32:48.260 --> 32:55.260]  Hundreds of research documents and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.260 --> 33:03.260]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:03.260 --> 33:12.260]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:12.260 --> 33:36.260]  I'm on the highway to hell, highway to hell.
[33:36.260 --> 33:51.260]  Alright folks, we are back and just an FYI, I did notice yesterday on Facebook where my friend Dave Champion did his presentation on the income tax and answered some questions and some general knowledge and information about it and everything.
[33:51.260 --> 34:06.260]  He did a bang up job, I want to congratulate him on that and for all the people that were able to watch the video, if you aren't, go to Dave's page, either Dave Champion or Dave Champion's Liberty on Facebook and take a look at the video.
[34:06.260 --> 34:14.260]  It will help a lot with the understanding of the income tax and who it applies to and get you started on his book, Income Tax Shattering the Miss.
[34:14.260 --> 34:32.260]  If you've ever wondered once again why they can take what's yours and claim it's theirs, that book is a light and a beacon of truth on how they're doing it, even though the law does not allow them to do so.
[34:32.260 --> 34:47.260]  It's fraud, it's always been fraud and they have worked diligently to ensure that the masses are ignorant of what they do, not the masses but those with the power.
[34:47.260 --> 34:56.260]  So folks, if you want a better understanding of the income tax, take a look at Dave's video and I highly, highly recommend that you get his book.
[34:56.260 --> 35:17.260]  It is time to end the IRS, it is time to put an end to the fraud that is making Americans lose their homes, lose their liberty and live in a freaking alley because of government, theft, fraud, extortion and general arrogance.
[35:17.260 --> 35:19.260]  It's time to change it.
[35:19.260 --> 35:27.260]  All right, that being said, we have Roger in Washington. Roger, what can we do for you?
[35:27.260 --> 35:30.260]  Hi, Eddie. It's been a while.
[35:30.260 --> 35:31.260]  Yes, sir?
[35:31.260 --> 35:45.260]  You mentioned about not enough good people willing to stand up and I heard something say about Texas. Have you ever heard of a Jural Assembly, which is where you must go?
[35:45.260 --> 35:47.260]  Heard of what?
[35:47.260 --> 35:50.260]  A Jural Assembly?
[35:50.260 --> 35:53.260]  No.
[35:53.260 --> 36:09.260]  Okay, I thought maybe you knew something about it in Texas. I heard it was pretty strong in Texas. It's basically people forming a society of sovereigns and living peacefully.
[36:09.260 --> 36:13.260]  We have a society of sovereigns. They just don't know it.
[36:13.260 --> 36:32.260]  Well, no, but what I'm saying is they do know it and they are announcing it and setting up... I don't want to say an organization because a free person by themselves doesn't mean it's an organization, but they...
[36:32.260 --> 36:43.260]  It's kind of a gathering of... That's why I think they call it an assembly. It's just a gathering of people who understand that they are free and that they're being violated.
[36:43.260 --> 36:55.260]  And they're giving notice to the de facto government of such things, which you basically have to do to get them off your tail, you know?
[36:55.260 --> 37:02.260]  Well, the thing about it is there are groups here that do kind of what you're talking about, the Republic of Texas folks being one of them.
[37:02.260 --> 37:15.260]  But their notice and everything gets them a lot of very unpopular attention, such as an illegal raid by the FBI, where they illegally raided the venue where they were having one of their meetings,
[37:15.260 --> 37:24.260]  held everybody hostage there at gunpoint, fingerprinted everybody, and had absolutely no probable cause for even being there.
[37:24.260 --> 37:25.260]  None.
[37:25.260 --> 37:44.260]  Yeah, none. Which is a big problem, but you have to stand up to that stuff and believe that their method is peaceful, and I guess the only resource...
[37:44.260 --> 37:57.260]  I don't want to state to the facto courts, because that'll go nowhere, but they essentially have their own courts.
[37:57.260 --> 38:04.260]  If nothing else, it brings attention to it, you know, to the rest of the population.
[38:04.260 --> 38:14.260]  I thought maybe you might know something about the Jural Assembly in Texas and what you could...
[38:14.260 --> 38:19.260]  Well, I do not recognize it by the name you're using to describe it.
[38:19.260 --> 38:29.260]  You cannot see by that name, because it's just a genetic term. So you mentioned Republic of Texas, correct?
[38:29.260 --> 38:33.260]  Republic of Texas.
[38:33.260 --> 38:35.260]  Okay. What did I say?
[38:35.260 --> 38:41.260]  I don't know. It sounded, from my end, like you said, public of Texas. I'm going like, well, that's us, but...
[38:41.260 --> 38:51.260]  Okay. Yeah. I don't know. Maybe my phone, it's off phone, but it dropped out. Yeah, the Republic of Texas.
[38:51.260 --> 38:52.260]  Yeah.
[38:52.260 --> 38:55.260]  Anything else to that? Just that?
[38:55.260 --> 39:03.260]  Well, they've held their own courts, they've held their own juries, they've put liens against people,
[39:03.260 --> 39:09.260]  and some of them have gone to jail for all the stuff that they do and blah, blah, blah.
[39:09.260 --> 39:24.260]  I can't say that information-wise they are incorrect, but I can tell you that exercise-wise they're certainly going to be treated as if they're incorrect.
[39:24.260 --> 39:27.260]  But, Eddie, we live in the land of the free.
[39:27.260 --> 39:32.260]  Yeah, but they ain't talking about us.
[39:32.260 --> 39:36.260]  That's true. That's true. I was just joking about that.
[39:36.260 --> 39:38.260]  Yeah.
[39:38.260 --> 39:42.260]  Yeah, they're the ones that are free to do anything they want.
[39:42.260 --> 39:51.260]  Well, that's the thing, though. They're only free to do what they want as long as we sit back and allow it.
[39:51.260 --> 39:57.260]  Yeah, and that was the thing I heard Steve's assembly do.
[39:57.260 --> 40:12.260]  It's like a watchdog over people, and the defect of government, and it cost my own life, easily.
[40:12.260 --> 40:17.260]  Which, I guess, to that end doesn't mean anything.
[40:17.260 --> 40:21.260]  Oh, well. Let's see.
[40:21.260 --> 40:39.260]  Right now, from all the way down from municipal level, all the way through federal government level, there are approximately slightly less than 22 million total government employees in this country.
[40:39.260 --> 40:43.260]  22 million.
[40:43.260 --> 40:52.260]  Okay. So, you're talking 330 million Americans.
[40:52.260 --> 40:58.260]  So, what is the ratio there?
[40:58.260 --> 41:09.260]  Well, it would be about 22 divided by 300, which is about 7%.
[41:09.260 --> 41:14.260]  Actually, it's a little bit more than that. It's like 12 to 1.
[41:14.260 --> 41:17.260]  12 or 13 to 1.
[41:17.260 --> 41:24.260]  So, for every government employee, there's 12 to 13 non-government employees in this country.
[41:24.260 --> 41:27.260]  Okay?
[41:27.260 --> 41:40.260]  So, if we decided to stand up together and say no, I don't think we're going to get a very strenuous argument to the contrary.
[41:40.260 --> 41:48.260]  At least not for long.
[41:48.260 --> 41:52.260]  But therein lies the problem.
[41:52.260 --> 42:00.260]  We've gotten so enamored with being separate from everyone else.
[42:00.260 --> 42:07.260]  We want to be so different that we can't be a part of anything.
[42:07.260 --> 42:10.260]  I mean, it's getting kind of ridiculous.
[42:10.260 --> 42:13.260]  We can't work together, which is exactly how they want things.
[42:13.260 --> 42:16.260]  They don't want us organized. They don't want us working together.
[42:16.260 --> 42:18.260]  They don't want us going the same direction.
[42:18.260 --> 42:20.260]  They don't want us holding the same beliefs.
[42:20.260 --> 42:22.260]  They don't want us to like each other.
[42:22.260 --> 42:33.260]  They don't want us to pay attention to what they're doing and how they're using us to do it.
[42:33.260 --> 42:52.260]  Well, for sure, they seem to be pretty organized on this. Of course, they're paying a lot of people a lot of big money to do it, and that's probably the difference.
[42:52.260 --> 42:57.260]  You know, all these demonstrations, all this other crap over that goes on.
[42:57.260 --> 43:05.260]  So those people don't even have a job. Otherwise, they wouldn't be out demonstrating, but they're getting poor.
[43:05.260 --> 43:10.260]  Well, maybe. Maybe not. I don't know anything on that aspect of it.
[43:10.260 --> 43:14.260]  Well, I mean, these things are funded by different sorrows, for example.
[43:14.260 --> 43:24.260]  Well, the thing is, we see lots of things saying that's the case, but what actual proof is there that that's the case?
[43:24.260 --> 43:36.260]  I'm not saying it's wrong. I'm just saying like everything else that they use to provide disinformation out there and to give you a scapegoat or a cause to fight for in one direction or the other.
[43:36.260 --> 43:39.260]  How hard is it to give you something and you latch on to it without verification?
[43:39.260 --> 43:45.260]  Because I watch people do it all the time. They take whatever's thrown in front of them in face value and say, that's the truth.
[43:45.260 --> 43:48.260]  And yet they have no clue if it is or it isn't.
[43:48.260 --> 43:52.260]  Hang on just a second. I got a break coming up and we'll finish this up on the other side.
[43:52.260 --> 43:57.260]  Alright folks, 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[44:22.260 --> 44:27.260]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[44:27.260 --> 44:34.260]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:34.260 --> 44:43.260]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.260 --> 44:52.260]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[44:52.260 --> 44:56.260]  Please visit ruleoflongradio.com and click on the banner.
[44:56.260 --> 45:01.260]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.260 --> 45:19.260]  Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Waterloo Street Sweet D here in Austin, Texas behind Brave New Books and Chase Banks to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:19.260 --> 45:31.260]  Have a look at our miracle healing clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products including our Australian emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:31.260 --> 45:44.260]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. That's 512-264-4043 naturespureorganics.com.
[45:44.260 --> 45:50.260]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products naturespureorganics.com.
[46:14.260 --> 46:41.260]  Alright folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. Call in number 512-646-1984. The phones are open if you want to call and get in line. And I am currently talking to Roger in Washington.
[46:41.260 --> 46:44.260]  Alright Roger, let's see if we can wrap this up.
[46:44.260 --> 46:51.260]  Okay, so did you say 22 million are government employees?
[46:51.260 --> 47:07.260]  Just under 22 million. 21,995,000 approximately. That's almost the entire population of Texas.
[47:07.260 --> 47:23.260]  Amazing isn't it? Well anyway, so bottom line then, I agree with what you say and tell people we don't really have a government because they don't do anything at all. They don't do anything.
[47:23.260 --> 47:29.260]  Oh, you're wrong. They do lots of things. Just nothing beneficial for us.
[47:29.260 --> 47:40.260]  They do a bad thing, but even in their going bad, so much of the employees literally do nothing. But that's just the point.
[47:40.260 --> 47:45.260]  So what would you suggest?
[47:45.260 --> 48:02.260]  Well, there is this thing called spring cleaning and sometimes spring cleaning is best accomplished by simply burning down the whole house.
[48:02.260 --> 48:06.260]  Well, I think we'd lose one.
[48:06.260 --> 48:14.260]  I don't know about that. 13 to 1, remember?
[48:14.260 --> 48:22.260]  It's just how default burning that house.
[48:22.260 --> 48:51.260]  Well, the thing is, there is so many different ways that things could have been done a bit different to make it where if nothing else, it would have taken a whole hell of a lot longer for things to go south for the sovereign states had the Constitution had some different mindsets behind it when it was written.
[48:51.260 --> 49:07.260]  See, the founding fathers, they wrote the Constitution for an honest people who only allowed honest people to work in their government.
[49:07.260 --> 49:27.260]  That is the one fallacy the Constitution failed to take into consideration above and beyond the fact that the people would care enough to pay attention so that in order to prevent those people that were helped to know good from holding that office to either A,
[49:27.260 --> 49:44.260]  never put them in there to begin with or B, to remove them at the very earliest opportunity. But the thing is, is that the Constitution didn't put in a way for the people to do that short of tarring, feathering or hanging.
[49:44.260 --> 50:03.260]  But see, that's the thing about that delegated power. The thing is, everybody assumes that when we delegate power to government, that we delegate it to just everybody in the government and we cannot pick and choose who gets to use it and that's wrong.
[50:03.260 --> 50:18.260]  As we the people can delegate the power to many, we can delegate it to one as well and as we can take it away from many, we can take it away from one as well.
[50:18.260 --> 50:37.260]  That's why I say the one thing that is missing from every single state and the federal constitutions is teeth that the people can use to bite their public servants head right off when they're not doing their job right and they shouldn't be empowering anymore.
[50:37.260 --> 50:48.260]  Whether it be people's impeachment, whether it be people's recall, whether it be a public freaking execution for treason.
[50:48.260 --> 50:55.260]  Hey, I would like to see Bill and Hillary, because you and I would be if we did what they did.
[50:55.260 --> 51:13.260]  If I was going to sentence these people to prison, they would all be in Arpaio's jail. I'm not sure Arpaio would get to run it, but they would be living like the people are in his jail out there in tents in the desert and they wouldn't be sitting there.
[51:13.260 --> 51:28.260]  They would be working. You want to eat, you better dig a well. You want to, so you have water, you better grow that food or you ain't going to have anything to eat out here in this place.
[51:28.260 --> 51:35.260]  Can you imagine Hillary Clinton having to dig a well to water plants so she could have lettuce?
[51:35.260 --> 51:39.260]  Absolutely not.
[51:39.260 --> 51:46.260]  I can't imagine it, but I would pay top dollar to see it happen.
[51:46.260 --> 51:58.260]  Well, I agree with what you said about the founders, but they had to have either made a lot of assumptions or deliberately did what they did.
[51:58.260 --> 52:11.260]  Well, they did do what they did deliberately, but not to undermine things. They trusted the people to do what the people needed to do to ensure their rights were protected.
[52:11.260 --> 52:17.260]  And of course, we became apathetic and lazy, and that didn't happen.
[52:17.260 --> 52:26.260]  Their greatest fear was realized in that the people didn't care enough to rule themselves.
[52:26.260 --> 52:30.260]  Well, there was a problem.
[52:30.260 --> 52:35.260]  Well, yes and no. The thing about it is you can't have it both ways.
[52:35.260 --> 52:45.260]  It's just like what in the Bible when it tells God told the Israelites that they were free, but they couldn't live free.
[52:45.260 --> 52:50.260]  They had to have a king or they couldn't live.
[52:50.260 --> 52:57.260]  And even though he tried to convince them otherwise, they insisted, so what happened? He gave them a king.
[52:57.260 --> 52:59.260]  They didn't like them.
[52:59.260 --> 53:08.260]  Exactly. So here they didn't want another king. They made every man and woman their own king.
[53:08.260 --> 53:17.260]  And just like every king and queen, you've got responsibilities or your kingdom is going to fall into total crap.
[53:17.260 --> 53:20.260]  Well, you brought it. Go ahead.
[53:20.260 --> 53:24.260]  No, that's it. Well, there you go.
[53:24.260 --> 53:33.260]  You brought up something in the past that White just flew out of the head.
[53:33.260 --> 53:48.260]  But it was going to be based on what he said. In a sense, the Constitution was really new legal because they weren't sent there to do it.
[53:48.260 --> 53:53.260]  They were sent to the Articles of Confederation.
[53:53.260 --> 54:03.260]  Again, the Articles of Confederation required a unanimous vote for the states to overturn. That didn't happen.
[54:03.260 --> 54:10.260]  There was no unanimous vote by the states to do away with the Articles of Confederation.
[54:10.260 --> 54:20.260]  It happened piecemeal over time, eventually, but I'm not sure it was by vote.
[54:20.260 --> 54:24.260]  Then there's a fact, and they're not off the books either. They're still there.
[54:24.260 --> 54:30.260]  Well, but find someone that will honor them on either side of the fence.
[54:30.260 --> 54:38.260]  Well, the same thing though with the Constitution. They don't honor that unless they want to put the words in their favor and then honor that.
[54:38.260 --> 54:45.260]  Yeah, well, that's the problem with having attorneys hold office.
[54:45.260 --> 54:49.260]  That's the whole reason the original 13th Amendment existed.
[54:49.260 --> 54:56.260]  Yeah, exactly. I was going to say that's what the Articles of Confederation had in it, and that's why they wanted to get rid of it.
[54:56.260 --> 55:02.260]  Well, no. The original 13th Amendment was not part of the Articles of Confederation. It was part of the new Constitution.
[55:02.260 --> 55:11.260]  And it was printed in that Constitution and all the law books containing that Constitution for over 65 years.
[55:11.260 --> 55:24.260]  And then suddenly a president declared that it was to be removed because the records showing that it was ratified were no longer in existence.
[55:24.260 --> 55:27.260]  He had no power to do that, but he did it.
[55:27.260 --> 55:28.260]  Right.
[55:28.260 --> 55:31.260]  And Congress had no power to agree with him, but they did it.
[55:31.260 --> 55:37.260]  Yeah. So is this illegal and lawful mess?
[55:37.260 --> 55:42.260]  No. If I was president, what they've done was itself. We have lost the record.
[55:42.260 --> 55:51.260]  This is unfinished business. Let's take a vote on this, see if we ratify or not. But they just picked it away.
[55:51.260 --> 56:02.260]  But I do believe Articles of Confederation banned lawyers also from holding public office.
[56:02.260 --> 56:04.260]  And they did other things too.
[56:04.260 --> 56:16.260]  Can you imagine every state has to agree to any legislation the federal government concoct?
[56:16.260 --> 56:24.260]  And every state agrees and it doesn't pass. That would slow down with...
[56:24.260 --> 56:35.260]  And so the state had to initiate a cause for legislation to the federal government.
[56:35.260 --> 56:41.260]  If it didn't come from the states, it didn't get put in a fall.
[56:41.260 --> 56:48.260]  And now have cooperation, whatever, foreign nation.
[56:48.260 --> 56:56.260]  Well, we're getting into an area that... U.S. history being what it is, I don't want to go off down all these tangents.
[56:56.260 --> 57:03.260]  I mean, you've been on here for coming up on two segments now. Is there a question anywhere in any of this?
[57:03.260 --> 57:11.260]  Well, yeah, the only question I had was if you were familiar with the most done with Texas and I wanted to learn more about it.
[57:11.260 --> 57:14.260]  Yeah, I don't have that one.
[57:14.260 --> 57:19.260]  Okay. All right. Well, get somebody else on that.
[57:19.260 --> 57:21.260]  All right, man. Thanks for calling in.
[57:21.260 --> 57:22.260]  Thanks.
[57:22.260 --> 57:23.260]  All right. Bye.
[57:23.260 --> 57:24.260]  Bye.
[57:24.260 --> 57:30.260]  All right. Now we have Tyler in Wyoming. Tyler, what can we do for you?
[57:30.260 --> 57:37.260]  Eddie, it's good to talk to you again. I appreciated your commentary there, especially on the property tax.
[57:37.260 --> 57:46.260]  And it's very true when you charge a property tax, you're basically taking ownership and just putting it in the hands of a rental agreement.
[57:46.260 --> 57:54.260]  So I appreciated your commentary on that. Also, I wondered, I heard you mentioned being champion in that book.
[57:54.260 --> 58:03.260]  How do I find out more about getting that book and then looking, did he have a website or how could I find out about that?
[58:03.260 --> 58:08.260]  Yeah, taxrevolt.us.
[58:08.260 --> 58:12.260]  Okay. All right.
[58:12.260 --> 58:14.260]  And that's just something I wanted to comment on.
[58:14.260 --> 58:23.260]  My main question was, I don't know if you remember what I was dealing with, that we were fighting a couple traffic tickets down here.
[58:23.260 --> 58:25.260]  Yeah, I remember a little bit about it, Tyler.
[58:25.260 --> 58:29.260]  Hang on just a second. I got a break coming up and we'll talk about it more on the other side. Okay.
[58:29.260 --> 58:36.260]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig, calling number tonight is 512-646-1984.
[58:36.260 --> 58:40.260]  If you want to call in, talk, got a question, something of that nature.
[58:40.260 --> 58:50.260]  Y'all hang on and we will be right back after this break.
[58:50.260 --> 58:58.260]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.260 --> 59:06.260]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.260 --> 59:09.260]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:09.260 --> 59:18.260]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.260 --> 59:28.260]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.260 --> 59:33.260]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.260 --> 59:44.260]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.260 --> 59:48.260]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.260 --> 59:51.260]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:51.260 --> 01:00:00.260]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:00.260 --> 01:00:12.260]  The Falling is Flash is brought to you by The Low Star of Lowdowns.
[01:00:12.260 --> 01:00:21.260]  Closed with gold at $1,318.52 an ounce. Silver, $16.39 an ounce. Texas Crude, $63.39 a barrel.
[01:00:21.260 --> 01:00:27.260]  Bitcoins at $8,127.35. 30ms at $819.48.
[01:00:27.260 --> 01:00:34.260]  And finally, Bitcoin Cash is at $1,013.04 a crypto coin.
[01:00:34.260 --> 01:00:41.260]  Today in History, the year 1940, Walt Disney's second full-length animated film Pinocchio premieres in theaters.
[01:00:41.260 --> 01:00:44.260]  Today in History.
[01:00:44.260 --> 01:00:51.260]  In recent news, current county California Superior Court Judge David Lampe stated in a ruling today that the
[01:00:51.260 --> 01:00:57.260]  Tasteries Bakery in Bakersfield indeed has the right to refuse to bake a cake for same-sex wedding,
[01:00:57.260 --> 01:01:02.260]  but only because the act of baking is protected under free speech, more specifically artistic expression.
[01:01:02.260 --> 01:01:07.260]  Judge Lampe made it clear that freedom of religion does not give a business the right to refuse service to groups
[01:01:07.260 --> 01:01:12.260]  protected by the Civil Rights Act. Quote, a retail tire shop may not refuse to sell a tire
[01:01:12.260 --> 01:01:15.260]  because the owner does not want to sell tires to same-sex couples.
[01:01:15.260 --> 01:01:20.260]  No baker may place their wares in a public display case, open their shop, and then refuse to sell
[01:01:20.260 --> 01:01:25.260]  because of race, religion, gender, or gender identification. Kathy Miller, the owner of the bake shop,
[01:01:25.260 --> 01:01:30.260]  responded by stating that, quote, I am very happy to serve everything from my cases to anybody,
[01:01:30.260 --> 01:01:33.260]  but I cannot be part of a celebration that goes against my Lord and Savior.
[01:01:33.260 --> 01:01:38.260]  This ruling seems to have been perfect timing since the high-profile case of the Colorado baker,
[01:01:38.260 --> 01:01:43.260]  Jack Phillips, who did the same by refusing to bake a wedding cake for the same-sex couple a few years back,
[01:01:43.260 --> 01:01:46.260]  is about to be ruled on by the Supreme Court.
[01:01:46.260 --> 01:01:51.260]  Under initiative set by Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu's government,
[01:01:51.260 --> 01:01:55.260]  tens of thousands of African refugees will soon be forcibly expelled from Israel.
[01:01:55.260 --> 01:02:00.260]  And as being reported that on Sunday, Israeli government employees began handing out some 20,000 notices
[01:02:00.260 --> 01:02:06.260]  informing 20,000 African men that they have two months to leave the country or risk-facing jail time.
[01:02:06.260 --> 01:02:13.260]  These unmarried men are being given two options. Go to prison or take $3,500 and be transported to a third country.
[01:02:13.260 --> 01:02:17.260]  With no official statements as to where that would be, it is suspected it is most likely Rwanda.
[01:02:17.260 --> 01:02:24.260]  Israeli pilots and doctors, among several others, have stated that they would not cooperate with any government efforts to remove migrants.
[01:02:24.260 --> 01:02:29.260]  The scenario has been in place since 2005 when Egypt's crackdown on Sudanese refugees
[01:02:29.260 --> 01:02:33.260]  triggered the mass migration of some 60,000 Africans who crossed into Israel
[01:02:33.260 --> 01:02:37.260]  before the 130-mile barrier was finished in 2013.
[01:02:37.260 --> 01:02:41.260]  It is estimated that some 20,000 have left since then.
[01:02:41.260 --> 01:02:46.260]  The low-star lowdown has turned looking for sponsors, sent apart for a service you'd like to advertise with us.
[01:02:46.260 --> 01:02:51.260]  Feel free to give me a call at 210-363-2277.
[01:02:51.260 --> 01:03:00.260]  This is quick-crowding with your lowdown for February 7, 2018.
[01:03:51.260 --> 01:03:56.260]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:03:56.260 --> 01:04:01.260]  Now that being said, we are talking with Tyler in Wyoming.
[01:04:01.260 --> 01:04:08.260]  The calling number is 512-646-1984 if you want to call and get in line.
[01:04:08.260 --> 01:04:11.260]  Alright Tyler, go ahead.
[01:04:11.260 --> 01:04:20.260]  Okay, the original ticket was from back in September for operating a motor vehicle without a valid driver's license, current driver's license.
[01:04:20.260 --> 01:04:29.260]  We've challenged that, of course, from your ideas and so forth, that there's no subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:04:29.260 --> 01:04:39.260]  One of the problems I'm trying to put together, though, is the judge, when we were in court, claimed that the motor vehicle
[01:04:39.260 --> 01:04:43.260]  code applied to everybody, not just people in commerce.
[01:04:43.260 --> 01:04:45.260]  What did the judge produce?
[01:04:45.260 --> 01:04:47.260]  The judge is making a legal conclusion.
[01:04:47.260 --> 01:04:53.260]  What law is he using to base that conclusion on?
[01:04:53.260 --> 01:04:55.260]  He didn't say anything.
[01:04:55.260 --> 01:05:03.260]  That's why you file a motion demanding of written, finding of facts and conclusions of law as to what he based that statement on.
[01:05:03.260 --> 01:05:05.260]  Okay.
[01:05:05.260 --> 01:05:11.260]  Also, I've been doing a lot of research in the library.
[01:05:11.260 --> 01:05:14.260]  I've been doing a lot of work on my own.
[01:05:14.260 --> 01:05:18.260]  I know I kind of frustrate you when I ask questions you think I should get.
[01:05:18.260 --> 01:05:20.260]  So I'm not mean to do that here, Eddie.
[01:05:20.260 --> 01:05:29.260]  But I'm having trouble putting together, for example, the term motor vehicle and when they say operate a motor vehicle.
[01:05:29.260 --> 01:05:40.260]  The common language with just everyday normal English, people think motor vehicle is just any kind of auto or passenger car or whatever they get into go down the street.
[01:05:40.260 --> 01:05:45.260]  But I understand there's a different definition when it comes to the motor vehicle codes.
[01:05:45.260 --> 01:05:53.260]  The problem is that I've been going back to the original bill when, for example, the driver's license act started.
[01:05:53.260 --> 01:05:56.260]  And for example, here it was in 1947.
[01:05:56.260 --> 01:05:58.260]  I'm in Wyoming.
[01:05:58.260 --> 01:06:03.260]  And the title of the bill was show first and driver's license act.
[01:06:03.260 --> 01:06:06.260]  The problem is it didn't say show first.
[01:06:06.260 --> 01:06:17.260]  I understand that's a commercial term, but it said and it didn't say or it said driver's license and show first act.
[01:06:17.260 --> 01:06:29.260]  So I'm having trouble proving, although I know it's true that by the term that they use when they say driver's license, they say, oh, I don't have to be a show first.
[01:06:29.260 --> 01:06:30.260]  Okay, hold on.
[01:06:30.260 --> 01:06:43.260]  If you're not, does Wyoming have a single subject requirement for bills that are being legislated upon?
[01:06:43.260 --> 01:06:46.260]  I don't know what you mean by that question.
[01:06:46.260 --> 01:06:51.260]  I should, but it's called the Wyoming Constitution.
[01:06:51.260 --> 01:07:09.260]  Is there a clause in the Wyoming Constitution that says the legislature must specify what single subject the bill they are writing encompasses?
[01:07:09.260 --> 01:07:11.260]  I would believe there is.
[01:07:11.260 --> 01:07:18.260]  I'd have to go back and read it again.
[01:07:18.260 --> 01:07:24.260]  Okay, well, don't you think that'd be kind of important to find out?
[01:07:24.260 --> 01:07:29.260]  What is the legislature authorized to create law to do?
[01:07:29.260 --> 01:07:37.260]  What must they do in order to create a law?
[01:07:37.260 --> 01:07:42.260]  Here in Texas, they're limited to a single subject for any legislative bill.
[01:07:42.260 --> 01:07:57.260]  So when you say chauffeurs and driver's licenses, if they're actually making two different subjects there and the Constitution says they can only have one, then they have a problem.
[01:07:57.260 --> 01:08:11.260]  However, if they can only have one, then chauffeurs and driver's licenses must be put together as a single subject.
[01:08:11.260 --> 01:08:12.260]  Don't you think?
[01:08:12.260 --> 01:08:13.260]  Okay.
[01:08:13.260 --> 01:08:14.260]  Yeah.
[01:08:14.260 --> 01:08:17.260]  You're saying that that could not be different.
[01:08:17.260 --> 01:08:19.260]  It would have to be the same thing.
[01:08:19.260 --> 01:08:20.260]  No.
[01:08:20.260 --> 01:08:21.260]  It's a different life.
[01:08:21.260 --> 01:08:22.260]  No.
[01:08:22.260 --> 01:08:28.260]  It is licensing of chauffeurs.
[01:08:28.260 --> 01:08:29.260]  Right.
[01:08:29.260 --> 01:08:30.260]  That's what I was saying.
[01:08:30.260 --> 01:08:31.260]  Yeah.
[01:08:31.260 --> 01:08:35.260]  And even though they use the term drivers too, it could mean anything but a chauffeur.
[01:08:35.260 --> 01:08:36.260]  No.
[01:08:36.260 --> 01:08:39.260]  A chauffeur is a driver.
[01:08:39.260 --> 01:08:40.260]  Okay.
[01:08:40.260 --> 01:08:41.260]  Yeah.
[01:08:41.260 --> 01:08:44.260]  I see where you're going.
[01:08:44.260 --> 01:08:45.260]  Okay.
[01:08:45.260 --> 01:08:46.260]  Well, I will look that up.
[01:08:46.260 --> 01:08:50.260]  I was reading in the Constitution, but I was getting into the article and so forth.
[01:08:50.260 --> 01:08:52.260]  I didn't get much into the bill.
[01:08:52.260 --> 01:08:53.260]  I do know that.
[01:08:53.260 --> 01:08:57.260]  Read the legislative department section.
[01:08:57.260 --> 01:09:01.260]  How does it say they are required to create law?
[01:09:01.260 --> 01:09:02.260]  Okay.
[01:09:02.260 --> 01:09:03.260]  Okay.
[01:09:03.260 --> 01:09:12.260]  And the other question I had was the circuit board here, these bills go directly into
[01:09:12.260 --> 01:09:13.260]  the circuit board.
[01:09:13.260 --> 01:09:15.260]  And these what?
[01:09:15.260 --> 01:09:20.260]  The judge claims, I'm sorry, the summits, the complaints.
[01:09:20.260 --> 01:09:21.260]  You mentioned it.
[01:09:21.260 --> 01:09:27.260]  I've been studying some of your work that you said that the citation that you receive on
[01:09:27.260 --> 01:09:32.260]  the side of the road is not the same thing as a formal complaint.
[01:09:32.260 --> 01:09:35.260]  It's not in Texas.
[01:09:35.260 --> 01:09:36.260]  Okay.
[01:09:36.260 --> 01:09:38.260]  It's probably not in most states.
[01:09:38.260 --> 01:09:43.260]  If you look at what the law says a complaint must have versus what a citation must have,
[01:09:43.260 --> 01:09:47.260]  they aren't the same thing in most cases.
[01:09:47.260 --> 01:09:53.260]  Do I specifically look up legislation dealing with how complaints are to be filed in the
[01:09:53.260 --> 01:09:55.260]  process and so forth?
[01:09:55.260 --> 01:09:58.260]  You have a criminal procedure code, right?
[01:09:58.260 --> 01:10:01.260]  Or a civil procedure code, right?
[01:10:01.260 --> 01:10:02.260]  How is it treated in Wyoming?
[01:10:02.260 --> 01:10:05.260]  Is it criminal or is it civil?
[01:10:05.260 --> 01:10:06.260]  It is criminal.
[01:10:06.260 --> 01:10:07.260]  Okay.
[01:10:07.260 --> 01:10:12.260]  Then what rules do they say you have to use when you go into court on it?
[01:10:12.260 --> 01:10:13.260]  Okay.
[01:10:13.260 --> 01:10:16.260]  For the citation, that's in rule three here.
[01:10:16.260 --> 01:10:25.260]  And they say that the main criminal complaints are filed by information and...
[01:10:25.260 --> 01:10:31.260]  You need to see if there's a special section for traffic stuff versus any other kind of
[01:10:31.260 --> 01:10:39.260]  criminal complaint, which means they're creating two separate methods of law for the same thing.
[01:10:39.260 --> 01:10:40.260]  Okay.
[01:10:40.260 --> 01:10:46.260]  They do have, like in the Wyoming's criminal procedure code, that's chapter three here,
[01:10:46.260 --> 01:10:54.260]  they say that a complaint, as the summative, they say it's suitable for a complaint.
[01:10:54.260 --> 01:10:56.260]  I don't agree with that, but...
[01:10:56.260 --> 01:10:57.260]  Okay.
[01:10:57.260 --> 01:10:58.260]  Wait a minute.
[01:10:58.260 --> 01:11:02.260]  Here in Texas, there are two specific sections dealing with the requirements of a complaint.
[01:11:02.260 --> 01:11:08.260]  One is in chapter 15 for any misdemeanor or felony act, okay?
[01:11:08.260 --> 01:11:16.260]  Other than a Class C fine only, which you will find in 45.019 of the code of criminal procedure
[01:11:16.260 --> 01:11:19.260]  in relation to Class C fine onlys.
[01:11:19.260 --> 01:11:27.260]  So there are two separate sections dealing with complaints depending upon the type of allegation.
[01:11:27.260 --> 01:11:28.260]  Okay.
[01:11:28.260 --> 01:11:30.260]  So you may have that there.
[01:11:30.260 --> 01:11:34.260]  I don't know, but you're going to have to check.
[01:11:34.260 --> 01:11:36.260]  Okay.
[01:11:36.260 --> 01:11:39.260]  Well, it's not...
[01:11:39.260 --> 01:11:42.260]  The thing about Wyoming, it's not real clear.
[01:11:42.260 --> 01:11:51.260]  They have...it says that for citations, for like traffic citations, all that is required
[01:11:51.260 --> 01:11:55.260]  is a complaint summons, whatever you want to call it, from the officer.
[01:11:55.260 --> 01:12:02.260]  And then when he brings that to the circuit court, that supposedly gives persona jurisdiction.
[01:12:02.260 --> 01:12:05.260]  And how it's worded in the rules here, it says if you...
[01:12:05.260 --> 01:12:08.260]  Okay, stop, stop, stop.
[01:12:08.260 --> 01:12:10.260]  Okay.
[01:12:10.260 --> 01:12:15.260]  The presenting of an accusation does not grant personal jurisdiction.
[01:12:15.260 --> 01:12:18.260]  Never has, never will.
[01:12:18.260 --> 01:12:20.260]  Okay.
[01:12:20.260 --> 01:12:27.260]  Plus, if what we have come to the possibility of here as far as the Wyoming Constitution
[01:12:27.260 --> 01:12:32.260]  and the single subject requirement versus the original title of the bill enacted by the legislature
[01:12:32.260 --> 01:12:39.260]  for driver's licenses, if the only people that the law can license are chauffeurs,
[01:12:39.260 --> 01:12:44.260]  then personal jurisdiction could not be had for anyone that is not a chauffeur.
[01:12:44.260 --> 01:12:47.260]  End of discussion.
[01:12:47.260 --> 01:12:50.260]  Great.
[01:12:50.260 --> 01:12:54.260]  Calling a chauffeur a driver doesn't change the fact that he has to be a chauffeur
[01:12:54.260 --> 01:13:00.260]  before it can be anything else, because that's what the legislation says.
[01:13:00.260 --> 01:13:05.260]  I agree with you, but they say that the driver is just a...
[01:13:05.260 --> 01:13:13.260]  I don't care what they say, make them use the law.
[01:13:13.260 --> 01:13:21.260]  Okay.
[01:13:21.260 --> 01:13:26.260]  Okay, now driving and operating, I did find case law here in Wyoming.
[01:13:26.260 --> 01:13:27.260]  Stop.
[01:13:27.260 --> 01:13:31.260]  Tyler, Tyler, solve this problem first.
[01:13:31.260 --> 01:13:35.260]  If you find out whether or not this is limited to licensing chauffeurs,
[01:13:35.260 --> 01:13:41.260]  then every damn thing in the code only applies to chauffeurs.
[01:13:41.260 --> 01:13:43.260]  Great.
[01:13:43.260 --> 01:13:46.260]  Answer that question first.
[01:13:46.260 --> 01:13:48.260]  I don't have all night to answer all of them right now,
[01:13:48.260 --> 01:13:51.260]  but we don't know where they're going to go yet.
[01:13:51.260 --> 01:13:53.260]  No, no, I hear yeti.
[01:13:53.260 --> 01:13:57.260]  Now, that was the original bill from 1947, which was titled...
[01:13:57.260 --> 01:14:03.260]  Again, has that changed from the original act?
[01:14:03.260 --> 01:14:07.260]  Have they only amended the original act by statute,
[01:14:07.260 --> 01:14:16.260]  or have they ever repealed it and reenacted it anew to cover something else?
[01:14:16.260 --> 01:14:18.260]  I think it's just been amended.
[01:14:18.260 --> 01:14:19.260]  Well, don't think.
[01:14:19.260 --> 01:14:21.260]  Find out.
[01:14:21.260 --> 01:14:22.260]  Okay.
[01:14:22.260 --> 01:14:26.260]  So it has to file or follow all the process to the bill.
[01:14:26.260 --> 01:14:30.260]  You have to go to the law library and you have to backtrack all the legislation
[01:14:30.260 --> 01:14:36.260]  to see if the original act was ever repealed and reenacted with a different subject.
[01:14:36.260 --> 01:14:38.260]  Okay.
[01:14:38.260 --> 01:14:40.260]  And if it was repealed, then that bill would...
[01:14:40.260 --> 01:14:44.260]  Then, well, worry about that bridge and jump off of it when we have to,
[01:14:44.260 --> 01:14:49.260]  but you need to find what it was repealed and turned into, don't you?
[01:14:49.260 --> 01:14:55.260]  Because you can't answer these other questions until you know that for sure.
[01:14:55.260 --> 01:14:59.260]  And if it was just amended, that means it still applies, correct?
[01:14:59.260 --> 01:15:00.260]  Yeah.
[01:15:00.260 --> 01:15:06.260]  They cannot alter original legislation by statutory amendment, not in any state.
[01:15:06.260 --> 01:15:08.260]  Okay.
[01:15:08.260 --> 01:15:09.260]  All right.
[01:15:09.260 --> 01:15:12.260]  And my last question, Eddie, I know you've got other callers.
[01:15:12.260 --> 01:15:15.260]  You mentioned standing, and I understand the concept of that.
[01:15:15.260 --> 01:15:18.260]  You have to have a cause of action at damaged parties.
[01:15:18.260 --> 01:15:24.260]  The problem is, like Alan versus Wright, that's a good case,
[01:15:24.260 --> 01:15:28.260]  but from what I understand, they always say that standing only applies to civil.
[01:15:28.260 --> 01:15:31.260]  Now, I've heard you say that it applies to criminals.
[01:15:31.260 --> 01:15:33.260]  Absolutely not.
[01:15:33.260 --> 01:15:40.260]  The state has no standing to make an allegation of harm where it can't prove it was harmed.
[01:15:40.260 --> 01:15:42.260]  But where's the case law on that?
[01:15:42.260 --> 01:15:46.260]  How do you prove that they have to have standing in a criminal trial?
[01:15:46.260 --> 01:15:52.260]  Because you can't falsely accuse someone of a crime.
[01:15:52.260 --> 01:15:56.260]  But they say that you broke a penal statute, though, for example.
[01:15:56.260 --> 01:15:58.260]  Again?
[01:15:58.260 --> 01:16:00.260]  I understand that, but...
[01:16:00.260 --> 01:16:02.260]  Again?
[01:16:02.260 --> 01:16:04.260]  You counter it.
[01:16:04.260 --> 01:16:06.260]  Again?
[01:16:06.260 --> 01:16:11.260]  You're going off in two different directions here.
[01:16:11.260 --> 01:16:17.260]  Only a chauffeur can violate the statute if it only applies to chauffeurs.
[01:16:17.260 --> 01:16:20.260]  You don't know that answer yet, do you?
[01:16:20.260 --> 01:16:23.260]  No.
[01:16:23.260 --> 01:16:25.260]  Okay?
[01:16:25.260 --> 01:16:32.260]  And then it would only apply to whoever the act originally intended it to apply to, and not everybody.
[01:16:32.260 --> 01:16:36.260]  Great.
[01:16:36.260 --> 01:16:40.260]  Okay, Eddie, I'll work on that, and I appreciate your time.
[01:16:40.260 --> 01:16:42.260]  Okay.
[01:16:42.260 --> 01:16:44.260]  Alright, back to where we were.
[01:16:44.260 --> 01:16:46.260]  Thanks for calling in, Tyler.
[01:16:46.260 --> 01:16:51.260]  Alright, folks, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:51.260 --> 01:17:17.260]  I got three more segments, so give me some collars here, folks. We'll be right back.
[01:17:17.260 --> 01:17:22.260]  Thanks for calling in, Tyler.
[01:17:47.260 --> 01:17:49.260]  Can I use my Amazon Prime?
[01:17:49.260 --> 01:17:50.260]  No.
[01:17:50.260 --> 01:17:51.260]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:51.260 --> 01:17:57.260]  Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money? This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:17:57.260 --> 01:17:58.260]  We are welcome.
[01:17:58.260 --> 01:18:27.260]  Happy Holidays, Logos!
[01:18:29.260 --> 01:18:34.260]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:18:34.260 --> 01:18:39.260]  The Michael Mirris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:18:39.260 --> 01:18:41.260]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:18:41.260 --> 01:18:47.260]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mirris banner,
[01:18:47.260 --> 01:18:50.260]  or email Michaelmirris at yahoo.com.
[01:18:50.260 --> 01:18:57.260]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:18:57.260 --> 01:19:00.260]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:00.260 --> 01:19:29.260]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.260 --> 01:19:50.260]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:50.260 --> 01:19:52.260]  This is rule of law radio.
[01:19:52.260 --> 01:19:56.260]  The calling number is 512-646-1984.
[01:19:56.260 --> 01:19:59.260]  And now we have Terrence in Florida.
[01:19:59.260 --> 01:20:01.260]  What can we do for you?
[01:20:01.260 --> 01:20:04.260]  Hey Eddie, thanks for letting me in.
[01:20:04.260 --> 01:20:15.260]  I wanted to ask you if you've done any studies concerning state citizens versus U.S. citizens.
[01:20:15.260 --> 01:20:18.260]  Well, I don't know what you mean by conducted any studies.
[01:20:18.260 --> 01:20:24.260]  Are you talking like an actual collegiate study of facts and other things?
[01:20:24.260 --> 01:20:25.260]  Pauling what?
[01:20:25.260 --> 01:20:27.260]  What are we talking about?
[01:20:27.260 --> 01:20:36.260]  Well, I don't know about collegiate, but in your search for the truth, have you come across anything?
[01:20:36.260 --> 01:20:39.260]  I've come across thousands of things.
[01:20:39.260 --> 01:20:46.260]  Well, there's a gentleman, Roger Sales wrote a book called Sovereign to Surf.
[01:20:46.260 --> 01:20:47.260]  Right.
[01:20:47.260 --> 01:20:51.260]  And his web page is sovereign to surf.com.org.
[01:20:51.260 --> 01:20:53.260]  I don't know which one.
[01:20:53.260 --> 01:21:04.260]  The book is a $5 download and I wanted to send it to you, but to PayPal I have to use my email and I can't get it out of my email.
[01:21:04.260 --> 01:21:19.260]  But it goes to the timeline of state versus U.S. citizens and how the government operates from the top down, not from the bottom up.
[01:21:19.260 --> 01:21:30.260]  And we're always fighting from the bottom up when the king at the top, Secretary of State, is in control of the states.
[01:21:30.260 --> 01:21:38.260]  How does the Secretary of State get to be in control of the states?
[01:21:38.260 --> 01:21:54.260]  Well, according to Roger Sales, he went to the Secretary of State of Florida seeking proof of the state's citizenship and was told by letter that he had to go to the Secretary of State of the United States
[01:21:54.260 --> 01:22:18.260]  who determines, has full control over citizenship and it breaks down to, I have control over that by my political choice and is my duty to inform the Secretary of State of my status and not have been informed me.
[01:22:18.260 --> 01:22:25.260]  Well, there is also the possibility that they misunderstood his question.
[01:22:25.260 --> 01:22:35.260]  I mean, it's not like you're dealing with Rhodes scholars when you talk to people in the federal or state government and ask them certain these questions.
[01:22:35.260 --> 01:22:46.260]  I've asked questions that to me you could not get any planer if you wrote it in crayon to a preschooler and they still didn't understand.
[01:22:46.260 --> 01:22:49.260]  Well, I understand that.
[01:22:49.260 --> 01:22:58.260]  So that's why I'm requesting that if you would look into getting the book is $5 and I'm going to try to send it to you.
[01:22:58.260 --> 01:23:17.260]  It's called Solver to Surf and solver to surf.com.
[01:23:17.260 --> 01:23:24.260]  I think you can handle it very well much better than I can because I drive a truck.
[01:23:24.260 --> 01:23:28.260]  Well, I'll see what I can do.
[01:23:28.260 --> 01:23:30.260]  Enjoy and thank you.
[01:23:30.260 --> 01:23:34.260]  Yes, sir.
[01:23:34.260 --> 01:23:35.260]  All right.
[01:23:35.260 --> 01:23:41.260]  And that leaves us with Carl in Oregon, Raider.
[01:23:41.260 --> 01:23:43.260]  It is me, Eddie.
[01:23:43.260 --> 01:23:45.260]  Yeah, I know it's you.
[01:23:45.260 --> 01:23:47.260]  Are you going to ask me a question?
[01:23:47.260 --> 01:23:51.260]  Are you going to piss me off?
[01:23:51.260 --> 01:24:02.260]  Well, I can't say but more than likely yes, but I think I'm going to tell you something that's truthful tonight and you will consider doing in adding it to your seminar material.
[01:24:02.260 --> 01:24:05.260]  And it's I think it's vital that you do so.
[01:24:05.260 --> 01:24:06.260]  And that is?
[01:24:06.260 --> 01:24:27.260]  I'm just looking to the invoking God the Creator into the court along with your material and all your motions and challenging jurisdiction and challenging and presenting discovery and demanding discovery of what the court is trying to charge you with.
[01:24:27.260 --> 01:24:46.260]  You must do so. You must bring in God the Father upon the courts and actually just to say, I invoke God the Creator, Father Yahweh's jurisdiction over this court to rule because He is the author of all laws, all constitutions, and all rights.
[01:24:46.260 --> 01:24:51.260]  Do you agree or disagree with that?
[01:24:51.260 --> 01:25:00.260]  I guess that would depend upon the context of the law in which we are speaking because I guarantee you not all the law that exists came from God.
[01:25:00.260 --> 01:25:04.260]  It came from some real A-holes that we're dealing with right now.
[01:25:04.260 --> 01:25:07.260]  Yeah, and who would that be?
[01:25:07.260 --> 01:25:12.260]  Well, that's sort of irrelevant to the question you asked me. We know who they are.
[01:25:12.260 --> 01:25:14.260]  I have the answer.
[01:25:14.260 --> 01:25:18.260]  Wickedness in spirits in high places.
[01:25:18.260 --> 01:25:22.260]  And?
[01:25:22.260 --> 01:25:27.260]  That have taken over these people's minds and souls to do what they're doing.
[01:25:27.260 --> 01:25:31.260]  You're assuming they had one in either case to begin with?
[01:25:31.260 --> 01:25:34.260]  Maybe they did. Maybe they didn't.
[01:25:34.260 --> 01:25:43.260]  I mean, isn't that what the Supreme Court ruled that you can be mindless, soulless, and stupid to be a cop?
[01:25:43.260 --> 01:25:49.260]  Yeah, I guess those are the excuses that they allow them to do.
[01:25:49.260 --> 01:25:52.260]  Okay, we know it's true to be an attorney.
[01:25:52.260 --> 01:26:00.260]  Well, absolutely. And who are the attorneys? They're responsible for all bloodshed going back to Cain and Abel.
[01:26:00.260 --> 01:26:15.260]  Well, like I said, if you could find a major catastrophic event in the entire history of America and possibly the world that did not involve an attorney at some point, I would be astounded. I would be beyond astounded.
[01:26:15.260 --> 01:26:22.260]  And they're in charge and they're helping their buddies in the insurance industry. All of this is an insurance industry.
[01:26:22.260 --> 01:26:34.260]  Okay, wait. This is getting off tangent here. That is not a question. You're giving out a bunch of facts that unless you've got stuff to back it up.
[01:26:34.260 --> 01:26:41.260]  There's statutory actions that they do. The subversion of laws. Taking the definition...
[01:26:41.260 --> 01:26:46.260]  What the hell does that have to do with the insurance companies?
[01:26:46.260 --> 01:26:48.260]  That's what sets it up for them to be able to do with their...
[01:26:48.260 --> 01:26:50.260]  What's your proof of that?
[01:26:50.260 --> 01:26:55.260]  The definitions in the law books. They remove the definitions of what the...
[01:26:55.260 --> 01:27:00.260]  How does that have anything to do with insurance?
[01:27:00.260 --> 01:27:06.260]  They use that so that way they can claim that motor vehicle applies to everyone in an automobile that has...
[01:27:06.260 --> 01:27:08.260]  Then who can claim that?
[01:27:08.260 --> 01:27:17.260]  The attorney, the legislature, and everyone that's in government and the insurance industry that are pushing that.
[01:27:17.260 --> 01:27:24.260]  The insurance company's lobbied to get the laws passed to require insurance for a guaranteed profit.
[01:27:24.260 --> 01:27:25.260]  Correct.
[01:27:25.260 --> 01:27:31.260]  It's that simple, but that has nothing to do with half the crap that I think you're talking about here.
[01:27:31.260 --> 01:27:35.260]  Everything is written. I said that at the beginning of the show.
[01:27:35.260 --> 01:27:45.260]  The laws are all written to benefit crony capitalism through the legislature and the people that put them in office and to keep them there.
[01:27:45.260 --> 01:27:48.260]  But it's not just insurance companies. It's everybody.
[01:27:48.260 --> 01:27:51.260]  The attorneys do it for themselves.
[01:27:51.260 --> 01:27:54.260]  The insurance companies get the legislators to do it for them.
[01:27:54.260 --> 01:27:57.260]  The legislators are invested in the insurance companies.
[01:27:57.260 --> 01:28:07.260]  They're invested in the stock market with these home mortgages that they're allowing these foreclosures and asset forfeitures on and so on and so forth.
[01:28:07.260 --> 01:28:11.260]  None of that's surprising. None of that's untrue.
[01:28:11.260 --> 01:28:13.260]  Absolutely.
[01:28:13.260 --> 01:28:25.260]  All I'm saying is, if we have a chance, we must, the first thing we must do is when we go into that courtroom is we must invoke God, God, Ways, Kingdom upon this court to take jurisdiction.
[01:28:25.260 --> 01:28:28.260]  That's all I'm saying. And that needs to be added to the material.
[01:28:28.260 --> 01:28:32.260]  And you're basing that on what?
[01:28:32.260 --> 01:28:34.260]  God is the writer of all...
[01:28:34.260 --> 01:28:36.260]  You're not answering my question.
[01:28:36.260 --> 01:28:45.260]  I'm not asking for your opinion. I'm asking you to tell me why that goes into the pleadings.
[01:28:45.260 --> 01:28:51.260]  It goes into the pleadings because God is the author, as I said, from the beginning.
[01:28:51.260 --> 01:28:54.260]  And I just told you, I disagree with that.
[01:28:54.260 --> 01:28:59.260]  Half the crap we're fighting against, God didn't have anything to do with putting in place.
[01:28:59.260 --> 01:29:04.260]  Some power tripping a-hole did.
[01:29:04.260 --> 01:29:16.260]  In the Bible, in Romans, for example, it says that God has put government in place here on earth.
[01:29:16.260 --> 01:29:22.260]  Lawful governments, yes. But we're not dealing with a lawful government.
[01:29:22.260 --> 01:29:24.260]  That's right. They turned away from God.
[01:29:24.260 --> 01:29:28.260]  So why do you think invoking him is going to help?
[01:29:28.260 --> 01:29:34.260]  What? You think they're going to turn to ash in front of you like vampires in daylight because you invoke his name?
[01:29:34.260 --> 01:29:35.260]  No.
[01:29:35.260 --> 01:29:39.260]  No? They're going to send you out for psychiatric evaluation.
[01:29:39.260 --> 01:29:42.260]  No, because I sent the message to them.
[01:29:42.260 --> 01:29:46.260]  I sent them the message. It's up to them what they're going to do, what they're going to do with their life.
[01:29:46.260 --> 01:29:49.260]  But they will have to stand in judgment one day.
[01:29:49.260 --> 01:29:55.260]  Well, unfortunately, I'm not going to get the one sitting there holding the gavel that says how they get judged.
[01:29:55.260 --> 01:30:00.260]  Let's go on just a minute. All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break.
[01:30:00.260 --> 01:30:06.260]  It seems like everywhere you turn nowadays, someone wants your name, social security number, and date of birth.
[01:30:06.260 --> 01:30:09.260]  But you should think twice before giving away your personal data.
[01:30:09.260 --> 01:30:36.260]  I'm Catherine Albrecht, and I'll say more in just a moment.
[01:30:40.260 --> 01:30:42.260]  The world's most private search engine.
[01:30:42.260 --> 01:30:45.260]  Forms, forms, forms, they're everywhere.
[01:30:45.260 --> 01:30:49.260]  But just because a piece of paper asks for information doesn't mean you have to give it.
[01:30:49.260 --> 01:30:56.260]  I lay blank spaces on forms all the time, or I write N slash A for not applicable, and usually nobody notices or cares.
[01:30:56.260 --> 01:31:03.260]  I never give my social security number or date of birth unless it's absolutely mandatory for employment or a government requirement.
[01:31:03.260 --> 01:31:09.260]  And I won't give my phone number to a company or an organization unless I actually want them to call me, and that's pretty rare.
[01:31:09.260 --> 01:31:14.260]  To preserve our vanishing privacy, we need to practice saying no to random data requests.
[01:31:14.260 --> 01:31:18.260]  It's like exercising a muscle. It gets easier the more you do it.
[01:31:18.260 --> 01:31:23.260]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:23.260 --> 01:31:37.260]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:37.260 --> 01:31:39.260]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.260 --> 01:31:44.260]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.260 --> 01:31:47.260]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:47.260 --> 01:31:50.260]  Thousands of my fellow forces found this at dying.
[01:31:50.260 --> 01:31:51.260]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.260 --> 01:31:52.260]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.260 --> 01:31:53.260]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:53.260 --> 01:31:54.260]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.260 --> 01:31:56.260]  I'm the father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.260 --> 01:31:58.260]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.260 --> 01:32:01.260]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.260 --> 01:32:04.260]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:04.260 --> 01:32:07.260]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:07.260 --> 01:32:12.260]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:12.260 --> 01:32:15.260]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.260 --> 01:32:21.260]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.260 --> 01:32:27.260]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.260 --> 01:32:32.260]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.260 --> 01:32:39.260]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.260 --> 01:32:46.260]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.260 --> 01:32:51.260]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in.
[01:32:51.260 --> 01:32:57.260]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.260 --> 01:32:59.260]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.260 --> 01:33:02.260]  I mean, I actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:02.260 --> 01:33:15.260]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:33:32.260 --> 01:33:44.260]  Look at that, Mio-Yos. That's the way you do it.
[01:33:44.260 --> 01:33:47.260]  You play the guitar on the MTV.
[01:33:47.260 --> 01:33:51.260]  That ain't working. That's the way you do it.
[01:33:51.260 --> 01:33:54.260]  Money for nothing. It's free.
[01:33:54.260 --> 01:33:58.260]  Now that ain't working. That's the way you do it.
[01:33:58.260 --> 01:34:08.260]  Now that ain't working. That's the way you do it.
[01:34:08.260 --> 01:34:10.260]  All right, folks. We are back.
[01:34:10.260 --> 01:34:16.260]  This is Rule of Law Radio with your host, Eddie Craig, and we are talking with Truth Raider in Oregon.
[01:34:16.260 --> 01:34:20.260]  Eddie, all I'm saying is that we...
[01:34:20.260 --> 01:34:23.260]  Raider, if you're going to huff and puff weed while you're on the radio, man,
[01:34:23.260 --> 01:34:26.260]  Excel before I put you back on.
[01:34:26.260 --> 01:34:30.260]  All right. Raider, that's fine. It's all good.
[01:34:30.260 --> 01:34:39.260]  Okay. The purpose of what I'm saying is that's really truly our only hope in this fight.
[01:34:39.260 --> 01:34:45.260]  If we're going to defeat these evil spirits that have taken human form
[01:34:45.260 --> 01:34:49.260]  and doing what they're doing to us because of greed, because of control and power,
[01:34:49.260 --> 01:34:56.260]  then we must use God the Father as our true lawyer in the matters that we face,
[01:34:56.260 --> 01:35:03.260]  whether it be against the IRS or it's the transportation code system scheme, the licensee scheme, whatever,
[01:35:03.260 --> 01:35:05.260]  whatever in life that they try to...
[01:35:05.260 --> 01:35:09.260]  Okay. Well, let me make a suggestion in return.
[01:35:09.260 --> 01:35:11.260]  Okay?
[01:35:11.260 --> 01:35:17.260]  Before you suggest I go dumping that into all of my documents for dissemination to others
[01:35:17.260 --> 01:35:21.260]  and you may or may not agree with it to begin with,
[01:35:21.260 --> 01:35:26.260]  why don't you do it yourself first and let me know how that turns out?
[01:35:26.260 --> 01:35:28.260]  I'm going to do that.
[01:35:28.260 --> 01:35:30.260]  Well, you'd be my guest and go right ahead.
[01:35:30.260 --> 01:35:32.260]  To do.
[01:35:32.260 --> 01:35:36.260]  In the meantime, I'm not going to sit down and rewrite all the damn paperwork for all this.
[01:35:36.260 --> 01:35:38.260]  Oh, no. We're going to have to do that.
[01:35:38.260 --> 01:35:40.260]  It's just a suggestion that you had to add that to that, I think.
[01:35:40.260 --> 01:35:43.260]  Well, I've had lots of suggestions about what to do with my paperwork.
[01:35:43.260 --> 01:35:46.260]  That doesn't mean I'm going to sit down and take them all.
[01:35:46.260 --> 01:35:49.260]  You know, God's got to be all rock. You know, it's got to be the walk of...
[01:35:49.260 --> 01:35:55.260]  Well, if he was a big enough rock, I would have already pounded in some heads with him.
[01:35:55.260 --> 01:36:00.260]  Well, that's because God just gives these people free will.
[01:36:00.260 --> 01:36:02.260]  Yes, he does.
[01:36:02.260 --> 01:36:09.260]  And hence, the reason why I don't see trying to remind them about him is going to have any effect on someone
[01:36:09.260 --> 01:36:14.260]  that has absolutely no consideration for what he decrees or doesn't decree.
[01:36:14.260 --> 01:36:17.260]  Well, that's a matter of opinion. Not all of them.
[01:36:17.260 --> 01:36:21.260]  There might be a lot of them that it does not affect, but some of them it might breach.
[01:36:21.260 --> 01:36:24.260]  There's that chance.
[01:36:24.260 --> 01:36:28.260]  Well, again, you give it a shot and let me know how it turns out.
[01:36:28.260 --> 01:36:31.260]  Okay. I'm going to use the seven interrogatories.
[01:36:31.260 --> 01:36:35.260]  I'm going to go into the court and ask where was the criminal conduct?
[01:36:35.260 --> 01:36:37.260]  Where was the applicable probable cause of the crime?
[01:36:37.260 --> 01:36:41.260]  I know what the interrogatories are for.
[01:36:41.260 --> 01:36:44.260]  That's for the civil infraction that this is supposed to be.
[01:36:44.260 --> 01:36:48.260]  What does that have to do with the reason you brought up?
[01:36:48.260 --> 01:36:52.260]  That's what I'm going to do when I go to the court because it's a civil infraction.
[01:36:52.260 --> 01:36:54.260]  You have the seven interrogatories, which he told me.
[01:36:54.260 --> 01:36:58.260]  The only thing that you do is where was the criminal conduct?
[01:36:58.260 --> 01:37:02.260]  Where did the officer witness any type of a crime in order to...
[01:37:02.260 --> 01:37:04.260]  But then they have jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction.
[01:37:04.260 --> 01:37:10.260]  No, no, no, no, no, no, no!
[01:37:10.260 --> 01:37:14.260]  It is not about the personal jurisdiction.
[01:37:14.260 --> 01:37:18.260]  It is not about the criminal conduct.
[01:37:18.260 --> 01:37:24.260]  It is about the lack of reasonable, articulable suspicion
[01:37:24.260 --> 01:37:28.260]  or probable cause for lack of criminal conduct.
[01:37:28.260 --> 01:37:32.260]  Okay. Those are in the questions and I'll ask them exactly how you wrote them down
[01:37:32.260 --> 01:37:35.260]  so that that's fine. I'm just paraphrasing and just first...
[01:37:35.260 --> 01:37:36.260]  I got all that.
[01:37:36.260 --> 01:37:43.260]  But that still doesn't tell me what you're talking about by putting God into the interrogatories.
[01:37:43.260 --> 01:37:47.260]  Not into the interrogatories, but that's my opening statement for the court.
[01:37:47.260 --> 01:37:51.260]  God, you always take jurisdiction over this court.
[01:37:51.260 --> 01:37:53.260]  That will be an opening statement.
[01:37:53.260 --> 01:37:57.260]  Then the questions follow afterwards.
[01:37:57.260 --> 01:38:00.260]  What do you mean the questions follow afterwards?
[01:38:00.260 --> 01:38:05.260]  After I make that opening statement and then when I have a chance to cross-examine the officer,
[01:38:05.260 --> 01:38:08.260]  I ask the seven interrogatories of that officer.
[01:38:08.260 --> 01:38:12.260]  Okay, let me ask you a question.
[01:38:12.260 --> 01:38:16.260]  Do you drink beer?
[01:38:16.260 --> 01:38:19.260]  At times, yeah.
[01:38:19.260 --> 01:38:21.260]  Bottle or can?
[01:38:21.260 --> 01:38:24.260]  Bottle or can.
[01:38:24.260 --> 01:38:27.260]  I go by can, man.
[01:38:27.260 --> 01:38:33.260]  Okay. Well, without opening one and emptying out the liquid first,
[01:38:33.260 --> 01:38:39.260]  do me a favor, pick one up and try to crush it against your forehead for me real quick.
[01:38:39.260 --> 01:38:43.260]  No.
[01:38:43.260 --> 01:38:54.260]  Is there something that you are once again not letting seek into your head about doing everything in writing?
[01:38:54.260 --> 01:38:59.260]  The interrogatories are for the purpose of discovery.
[01:38:59.260 --> 01:39:07.260]  You will never be allowed to ask those questions and get answers to them from a witness on the stand
[01:39:07.260 --> 01:39:14.260]  unless they have been admitted into evidence or they have been sought and turned over as evidence.
[01:39:14.260 --> 01:39:16.260]  All right.
[01:39:16.260 --> 01:39:20.260]  So I'll take them as my trial is not my so-called trial.
[01:39:20.260 --> 01:39:23.260]  It's a tribunal, basically, gang record.
[01:39:23.260 --> 01:39:28.260]  I have plenty of time until March the 28th to turn in those so I could take those.
[01:39:28.260 --> 01:39:32.260]  What do you mean to turn in those? What happens March the 28th?
[01:39:32.260 --> 01:39:35.260]  That's when the tribunal is going to be taking place.
[01:39:35.260 --> 01:39:38.260]  Then why do you have a till then to get it done?
[01:39:38.260 --> 01:39:44.260]  Most places require that you do discovery no less than 30 days prior to any of the proceedings
[01:39:44.260 --> 01:39:47.260]  in which that discovery will be produced.
[01:39:47.260 --> 01:39:57.260]  All right. I have all of that and I have the file of the seven interrogatories in the discovery as well.
[01:39:57.260 --> 01:40:03.260]  Where did you get the interrogatories from, Carl?
[01:40:03.260 --> 01:40:07.260]  In the section there on your site. It says under civil infraction.
[01:40:07.260 --> 01:40:13.260]  You mean in the article on my legal blog where it says,
[01:40:13.260 --> 01:40:20.260]  write a motion for discovery using the seven interrogatories below.
[01:40:20.260 --> 01:40:22.260]  You mean that article?
[01:40:22.260 --> 01:40:24.260]  Yes.
[01:40:24.260 --> 01:40:29.260]  Which you read when?
[01:40:29.260 --> 01:40:33.260]  I believe I did yesterday. I was reading through them and I wrote all the questions.
[01:40:33.260 --> 01:40:38.260]  Yesterday? How many months ago did we talk about this?
[01:40:38.260 --> 01:40:41.260]  Months and months ago. I understand. I've been busy working.
[01:40:41.260 --> 01:40:46.260]  I haven't had time to sit down and watch that work I've got to go through and I haven't had time to do it.
[01:40:46.260 --> 01:40:48.260]  Okay.
[01:40:48.260 --> 01:40:53.260]  So what you're saying is you essentially do not have time to properly prepare your case to win.
[01:40:53.260 --> 01:40:58.260]  I will have time now. I'll make time for it, but I've been working.
[01:40:58.260 --> 01:41:02.260]  How are you going to have time if you go in on the 28th of this month?
[01:41:02.260 --> 01:41:04.260]  No, next month.
[01:41:04.260 --> 01:41:06.260]  You're sure it's next month?
[01:41:06.260 --> 01:41:15.260]  Yes. They sent me a notice in the mail saying that they entered a plea on my behalf and are setting up a trial on March 28.
[01:41:15.260 --> 01:41:22.260]  Well, they entered a plea without A, a probable cause determination and B, without any evidence of probable cause.
[01:41:22.260 --> 01:41:26.260]  Because of what?
[01:41:26.260 --> 01:41:28.260]  It's a civil infraction.
[01:41:28.260 --> 01:41:31.260]  Correct.
[01:41:31.260 --> 01:41:39.260]  And another thing too, I did check up at the B of B and there's no listing of any fines that I have to pay to them in order to...
[01:41:39.260 --> 01:41:46.260]  If I chose to and I don't choose to, but if I chose to get a driver's license again, the fines are not there.
[01:41:46.260 --> 01:41:49.260]  What's your point?
[01:41:49.260 --> 01:41:52.260]  I mean, it's unlawful.
[01:41:52.260 --> 01:42:01.260]  The fines that they assessed to me are not proper for them to truly try to extract or...
[01:42:01.260 --> 01:42:07.260]  You're making a presumption. Stop doing that.
[01:42:07.260 --> 01:42:09.260]  I researched it. They're not there.
[01:42:09.260 --> 01:42:10.260]  The fines are not there.
[01:42:10.260 --> 01:42:16.260]  Which is still not an answer that gives you the statement you're making.
[01:42:16.260 --> 01:42:24.260]  You don't know why they're not there. You're presuming why they're not there because it's the way you want things to be.
[01:42:24.260 --> 01:42:27.260]  That doesn't make it a fact.
[01:42:27.260 --> 01:42:34.260]  No, you found that they don't have them listed. That is not the why, is it?
[01:42:34.260 --> 01:42:43.260]  You made up the why because you don't have any documents that tell you why it's not there, do you?
[01:42:43.260 --> 01:42:50.260]  Yes, the documents says it's not there. That's it.
[01:42:50.260 --> 01:42:56.260]  Remind me never to change a tire with you on the side of the road.
[01:42:56.260 --> 01:43:02.260]  Especially if I'm the one having to get under the car.
[01:43:02.260 --> 01:43:06.260]  Anyway, okay, good luck.
[01:43:06.260 --> 01:43:07.260]  All right.
[01:43:07.260 --> 01:43:08.260]  All right.
[01:43:08.260 --> 01:43:09.260]  That's what I'm going to do though.
[01:43:09.260 --> 01:43:12.260]  I do definitely consider that.
[01:43:12.260 --> 01:43:16.260]  Consider all you want. Let me know how it turns out.
[01:43:16.260 --> 01:43:21.260]  It'll turn out for the best because on the right side of God, then we have...
[01:43:21.260 --> 01:43:22.260]  Let me know.
[01:43:22.260 --> 01:43:24.260]  Just trying to do it ourselves.
[01:43:24.260 --> 01:43:27.260]  We don't have much power.
[01:43:27.260 --> 01:43:31.260]  Yeah, we need to have that as our power. Our shield and buckler is God, so we have to go by that.
[01:43:31.260 --> 01:43:36.260]  That's all we have right now, and he goes to learn in difficult times.
[01:43:36.260 --> 01:43:41.260]  Well, I like to think we have a little bit of common sense and willpower of our own too, you know?
[01:43:41.260 --> 01:43:44.260]  That's what that free will thing is supposed to be all about.
[01:43:44.260 --> 01:43:45.260]  All right.
[01:43:45.260 --> 01:43:47.260]  Give that to us by way of...
[01:43:47.260 --> 01:43:48.260]  All right.
[01:43:48.260 --> 01:43:51.260]  I got a break, and I'm going to take the next call or when we get back.
[01:43:51.260 --> 01:43:53.260]  So get busy and do it right.
[01:43:53.260 --> 01:43:54.260]  I'll talk to you next round.
[01:43:54.260 --> 01:43:56.260]  We'll be right back, folks.
[01:43:56.260 --> 01:44:00.260]  Y'all hang on.
[01:44:00.260 --> 01:44:05.260]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:05.260 --> 01:44:09.260]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Merris Proven Method.
[01:44:09.260 --> 01:44:14.260]  Michael Merris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:44:14.260 --> 01:44:20.260]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:44:20.260 --> 01:44:24.260]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons?
[01:44:24.260 --> 01:44:26.260]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[01:44:26.260 --> 01:44:29.260]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report?
[01:44:29.260 --> 01:44:33.260]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[01:44:33.260 --> 01:44:38.260]  The Michael Merris Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.260 --> 01:44:40.260]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.260 --> 01:44:49.260]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Merris banner, or email Michael Merris at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.260 --> 01:44:57.260]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:44:57.260 --> 01:45:03.260]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now, are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.260 --> 01:45:14.260]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.260 --> 01:45:18.260]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.260 --> 01:45:22.260]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.260 --> 01:45:27.260]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.260 --> 01:45:34.260]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.260 --> 01:45:43.260]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.260 --> 01:45:52.260]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.260 --> 01:46:01.260]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:22.260 --> 01:46:50.260]  All right folks, we are back.
[01:46:50.260 --> 01:46:52.260]  This is rule of law radio.
[01:46:52.260 --> 01:47:00.260]  We are now in the last segment of the Monday Night Show, and the last caller we have up on the board here is Brett in Texas.
[01:47:00.260 --> 01:47:03.260]  Brett, what can we do for you?
[01:47:03.260 --> 01:47:05.260]  Good evening, Eddie.
[01:47:05.260 --> 01:47:07.260]  Thank you.
[01:47:07.260 --> 01:47:09.260]  I think I can make this pretty quick.
[01:47:09.260 --> 01:47:19.260]  I've got some questions that you can hopefully point me in the right direction of what I need to be researching here.
[01:47:19.260 --> 01:47:21.260]  I need some advice.
[01:47:21.260 --> 01:47:23.260]  I'm trying to get...
[01:47:23.260 --> 01:47:30.260]  There's a county court that is unlawfully attempting to prevent my appeal.
[01:47:30.260 --> 01:47:39.260]  They've rendered a bogus judgment, and I'm trying to get into the appeals court, and they're lying, and they're secreting my motion for a new trial saying they never got it.
[01:47:39.260 --> 01:47:41.260]  How did you file it?
[01:47:41.260 --> 01:47:43.260]  By fax.
[01:47:43.260 --> 01:47:49.260]  I found out that the lady told me to my face, oh, we don't file anything that was filed by fax.
[01:47:49.260 --> 01:47:51.260]  So we just...
[01:47:51.260 --> 01:47:54.260]  It's here, but it's not in the file.
[01:47:54.260 --> 01:48:01.260]  And I told her, well, Texas Rules of Procedure here tells us T-E-R-C-P.
[01:48:01.260 --> 01:48:03.260]  She didn't want to hear it.
[01:48:03.260 --> 01:48:15.260]  She categorized fax as their e-filing system and saying that I've got to use their e-filing system, blah, blah, which is not really true because...
[01:48:15.260 --> 01:48:16.260]  No, it's not true.
[01:48:16.260 --> 01:48:19.260]  You don't have to use their e-filing system.
[01:48:19.260 --> 01:48:20.260]  Right.
[01:48:20.260 --> 01:48:27.260]  It applies only to lawyers, and it's only in certain counties they're going to just graduated roll out, and it's not even for criminal care.
[01:48:27.260 --> 01:48:30.260]  It's only civil and only for attorneys.
[01:48:30.260 --> 01:48:39.260]  So I'm trying to figure out how do I bring this up to the Court of Appeals and say, hey, this lady's a liar.
[01:48:39.260 --> 01:48:43.260]  You file a writ of mandamus, but you can't file it with the Court of Appeals.
[01:48:43.260 --> 01:48:47.260]  The Court of Appeals does not have mandamus powers.
[01:48:47.260 --> 01:48:51.260]  So if it's a civil case, you have to send it to the Supreme Court.
[01:48:51.260 --> 01:48:56.260]  If it's a criminal case, you've got to send it to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
[01:48:56.260 --> 01:48:57.260]  Court of Criminal Appeals.
[01:48:57.260 --> 01:48:58.260]  Okay.
[01:48:58.260 --> 01:49:04.260]  Yeah, not the appeals courts, the Court of Criminal Appeals.
[01:49:04.260 --> 01:49:05.260]  Gotcha.
[01:49:05.260 --> 01:49:06.260]  Okay, thank you.
[01:49:06.260 --> 01:49:08.260]  No, I don't do with that one.
[01:49:08.260 --> 01:49:10.260]  Other question here.
[01:49:10.260 --> 01:49:15.260]  Now, if you have a recording of her saying what she's saying and doing what she's doing, all the better.
[01:49:15.260 --> 01:49:22.260]  Make a transcript and a copy of the video or audio, whatever it is, and send it with it.
[01:49:22.260 --> 01:49:23.260]  Okay.
[01:49:23.260 --> 01:49:33.260]  Along with a criminal complaint of tampering with government records and denying access to the courts and filed against the judge and the head clerk.
[01:49:33.260 --> 01:49:35.260]  Oh, the judge too.
[01:49:35.260 --> 01:49:36.260]  That's good.
[01:49:36.260 --> 01:49:39.260]  Yeah, because presumably she's obeying his instructions, right?
[01:49:39.260 --> 01:49:43.260]  She's an agent of the judge.
[01:49:43.260 --> 01:49:44.260]  All right, cool.
[01:49:44.260 --> 01:49:46.260]  Okay, another question here.
[01:49:46.260 --> 01:49:49.260]  I've got a different situation in the municipal court.
[01:49:49.260 --> 01:49:54.260]  And they are pushing, pushing, pushing to trial on the merits.
[01:49:54.260 --> 01:49:59.260]  And they're blowing past everything including discovery.
[01:49:59.260 --> 01:50:04.260]  The judge told me to my face, you're not getting any discovery.
[01:50:04.260 --> 01:50:07.260]  She won't let me.
[01:50:07.260 --> 01:50:12.260]  You know, I sent a copy, a courtesy copy when I was asking the prosecution for discovery.
[01:50:12.260 --> 01:50:14.260]  I sent a courtesy copy to the court clerk.
[01:50:14.260 --> 01:50:18.260]  Well, the judge intercepted it and says, no.
[01:50:18.260 --> 01:50:20.260]  You're not getting any discovery.
[01:50:20.260 --> 01:50:24.260]  What did you ask for?
[01:50:24.260 --> 01:50:32.260]  Well, some basic stuff about the officer's training and I can't remember off the top of my head.
[01:50:32.260 --> 01:50:33.260]  I wanted to know the name.
[01:50:33.260 --> 01:50:47.260]  Okay, then file a written objection that the judge in the case specifically and intentionally denied you discovery of both the evidence being used against you and any potential exculpatory evidence that may exist in the case.
[01:50:47.260 --> 01:50:56.260]  File a written objection and get that filed in your case.
[01:50:56.260 --> 01:50:59.260]  Yeah, I got written objections in there already.
[01:50:59.260 --> 01:51:01.260]  She told me those are denied.
[01:51:01.260 --> 01:51:03.260]  I said, that's not a motion for you to deny.
[01:51:03.260 --> 01:51:08.260]  Well, it's overruled.
[01:51:08.260 --> 01:51:12.260]  So I'm looking at, do I want to do like an interlocutory appeal to the appeal?
[01:51:12.260 --> 01:51:13.260]  Absolutely.
[01:51:13.260 --> 01:51:14.260]  For the appeals?
[01:51:14.260 --> 01:51:15.260]  Absolutely.
[01:51:15.260 --> 01:51:16.260]  For you?
[01:51:16.260 --> 01:51:17.260]  Absolutely.
[01:51:17.260 --> 01:51:18.260]  Okay.
[01:51:18.260 --> 01:51:22.260]  And is there any way that I can get subpoenas?
[01:51:22.260 --> 01:51:25.260]  Can I have subpoenas of certain people that like the police chief?
[01:51:25.260 --> 01:51:26.260]  Absolutely.
[01:51:26.260 --> 01:51:32.260]  You can subpoena anyone that you feel has evidence relevant to the case.
[01:51:32.260 --> 01:51:36.260]  And you do not need the court to send the subpoena.
[01:51:36.260 --> 01:51:40.260]  If you have the seminar materials, there are sample subpoenas in there.
[01:51:40.260 --> 01:51:41.260]  Oh, okay.
[01:51:41.260 --> 01:51:42.260]  I missed them then.
[01:51:42.260 --> 01:51:43.260]  Wonderful.
[01:51:43.260 --> 01:51:47.260]  I was trying to find something like that.
[01:51:47.260 --> 01:51:48.260]  Great.
[01:51:48.260 --> 01:51:51.260]  So, yeah, there's several people.
[01:51:51.260 --> 01:51:54.260]  I'd like to get the executive director of TECOL in there.
[01:51:54.260 --> 01:51:55.260]  Okay.
[01:51:55.260 --> 01:52:02.260]  Yeah, I mean, I wrote, when I went to traffic court here in Austin, I wrote subpoenas and
[01:52:02.260 --> 01:52:10.260]  had the head person in charge of placing speed signs on Texas highways for the Austin District
[01:52:10.260 --> 01:52:12.260]  summoned as a witness.
[01:52:12.260 --> 01:52:13.260]  Perfect.
[01:52:13.260 --> 01:52:18.260]  And I did a subpoena deuce's tecum where he had to produce his records showing how he
[01:52:18.260 --> 01:52:22.260]  had established a speed limit on a particular section of highway.
[01:52:22.260 --> 01:52:30.260]  And then I had him testify as to what the 201.904 said.
[01:52:30.260 --> 01:52:36.260]  I bet they like that.
[01:52:36.260 --> 01:52:40.260]  No, they didn't like that.
[01:52:40.260 --> 01:52:43.260]  But that's the problem.
[01:52:43.260 --> 01:52:48.260]  So, I wanted to share something that I found that you may already know this.
[01:52:48.260 --> 01:52:49.260]  I don't know.
[01:52:49.260 --> 01:52:51.260]  It was a wonderful discovery for me.
[01:52:51.260 --> 01:53:00.260]  In the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration, Rule 11, specifically, it allows somebody
[01:53:00.260 --> 01:53:05.260]  in specific circumstances, you have to have at least one traffic case that's old enough.
[01:53:05.260 --> 01:53:06.260]  I think it's 97.
[01:53:06.260 --> 01:53:08.260]  I have to go back and look again.
[01:53:08.260 --> 01:53:10.260]  I think it's 97.
[01:53:10.260 --> 01:53:18.260]  If you have one that's old enough and any number of newer ones, and they have commonality
[01:53:18.260 --> 01:53:22.260]  of related law and facts, which of course they all do.
[01:53:22.260 --> 01:53:25.260]  They're all doing the same wrong thing to us.
[01:53:25.260 --> 01:53:36.260]  And you can ask the presiding regional judge to deal with all of them at once.
[01:53:36.260 --> 01:53:43.260]  And I thought that was pretty cool because then we can get this issue of trying to process
[01:53:43.260 --> 01:53:51.260]  things on the complaint only or what the heck is the thing that's being done?
[01:53:51.260 --> 01:53:52.260]  You're fading out here.
[01:53:52.260 --> 01:53:55.260]  You're turning your mouth away from your phone.
[01:53:55.260 --> 01:53:56.260]  Okay.
[01:53:56.260 --> 01:53:57.260]  Sorry about that.
[01:53:57.260 --> 01:53:59.260]  I don't know why.
[01:53:59.260 --> 01:54:00.260]  Is that better?
[01:54:00.260 --> 01:54:01.260]  Yeah.
[01:54:01.260 --> 01:54:11.260]  So yeah, I've got a Rule 11 into a first judicial administrative region right now, and they're
[01:54:11.260 --> 01:54:13.260]  hopefully going to be addressing this.
[01:54:13.260 --> 01:54:19.260]  I thought that would be interesting to share with you and maybe somebody else has some old
[01:54:19.260 --> 01:54:20.260]  tickets.
[01:54:20.260 --> 01:54:24.260]  Like you said, you can challenge jurisdiction at any time in perpetuity.
[01:54:24.260 --> 01:54:33.260]  You know, you get the case marked as having a challenge to jurisdiction, and then this
[01:54:33.260 --> 01:54:37.260]  presiding regional judge needs to deal with all of these things at once.
[01:54:37.260 --> 01:54:41.260]  I'm looking forward to that.
[01:54:41.260 --> 01:54:46.260]  Yeah, there is a possibility you could file a motion to disqualify this judge for violation
[01:54:46.260 --> 01:54:53.260]  of your right of discovery and due process and put that in, as well as the complaints
[01:54:53.260 --> 01:54:58.260]  to the and the mandamus or the, I'm sorry, the interlocutory appeal.
[01:54:58.260 --> 01:55:04.260]  Yeah, I did put in a motion to disqualify that particular judge.
[01:55:04.260 --> 01:55:13.260]  The presiding regional judge said no, but they did reprimand the judge and made the judge
[01:55:13.260 --> 01:55:19.260]  back up to the previous date as of the status of a certain date and basically undo a bunch
[01:55:19.260 --> 01:55:22.260]  of things she had done or overturn or whatever they call it.
[01:55:22.260 --> 01:55:25.260]  And made her kind of back up and start over.
[01:55:25.260 --> 01:55:30.260]  You do have to address all of these motions and all of these objectives if he's got it
[01:55:30.260 --> 01:55:31.260]  in the record.
[01:55:31.260 --> 01:55:33.260]  You can't just ignore them.
[01:55:33.260 --> 01:55:36.260]  You're turning away from your phone again.
[01:55:36.260 --> 01:55:38.260]  I'm just sitting still.
[01:55:38.260 --> 01:55:40.260]  I don't know.
[01:55:40.260 --> 01:55:42.260]  It keeps fading out as you keep talking.
[01:55:42.260 --> 01:55:46.260]  It starts to go, that's what you sound like.
[01:55:46.260 --> 01:55:49.260]  Oh, no.
[01:55:49.260 --> 01:55:56.260]  Okay, but if I picked up what you did, you said that they told her that she had to address
[01:55:56.260 --> 01:56:00.260]  each of your motions and everything and your objections and everything else that you have.
[01:56:00.260 --> 01:56:04.260]  Now, is this a JP or is this a municipal judge?
[01:56:04.260 --> 01:56:06.260]  Municipal, municipal judge.
[01:56:06.260 --> 01:56:07.260]  More on.
[01:56:07.260 --> 01:56:10.260]  Court of record or no record?
[01:56:10.260 --> 01:56:12.260]  They call it a court of record.
[01:56:12.260 --> 01:56:15.260]  She's up there pushing the button to record things.
[01:56:15.260 --> 01:56:20.260]  Okay, then she has to be an attorney if it's a court of record.
[01:56:20.260 --> 01:56:21.260]  She is.
[01:56:21.260 --> 01:56:23.260]  Okay, then right there is adjusted.
[01:56:23.260 --> 01:56:29.260]  Proof positive why idiots with bar cards are no more qualified to sit in that court than
[01:56:29.260 --> 01:56:31.260]  anyone else.
[01:56:31.260 --> 01:56:37.260]  Proof positive that just because you have a bar card, you do not understand individual
[01:56:37.260 --> 01:56:42.260]  rights due process or the law.
[01:56:42.260 --> 01:56:44.260]  Right.
[01:56:44.260 --> 01:56:49.260]  So she was mad because she had to address all these things and she categorically denied
[01:56:49.260 --> 01:56:50.260]  everything.
[01:56:50.260 --> 01:56:51.260]  She said they're all denied.
[01:56:51.260 --> 01:56:52.260]  They're all overruled.
[01:56:52.260 --> 01:56:54.260]  I said, on what grounds?
[01:56:54.260 --> 01:56:55.260]  That's my ruling.
[01:56:55.260 --> 01:56:58.260]  Could you please go through those one by one?
[01:56:58.260 --> 01:57:01.260]  Have 99 of them for her to talk about it.
[01:57:01.260 --> 01:57:05.260]  Did you put in an order for each one?
[01:57:05.260 --> 01:57:06.260]  I didn't order.
[01:57:06.260 --> 01:57:07.260]  No, I didn't.
[01:57:07.260 --> 01:57:13.260]  If you're using the seminar material, every one of those motions has a proposed order.
[01:57:13.260 --> 01:57:16.260]  You always put a proposed order with a motion.
[01:57:16.260 --> 01:57:17.260]  Always.
[01:57:17.260 --> 01:57:22.260]  And you make the judge sign it if they deny it or grant it.
[01:57:22.260 --> 01:57:24.260]  How do you make them sign it?
[01:57:24.260 --> 01:57:27.260]  Because you object when they don't.
[01:57:27.260 --> 01:57:29.260]  You follow written objection.
[01:57:29.260 --> 01:57:33.260]  The court failed to sign the order denying or granting the motion.
[01:57:33.260 --> 01:57:39.260]  Therefore, the presumption is the court failed to address the motion as a matter of law.
[01:57:39.260 --> 01:57:47.260]  Now, see, the thing is, is when a motion is never answered or done anything with, the
[01:57:47.260 --> 01:57:50.260]  presumption of law is that the motion is denied.
[01:57:50.260 --> 01:57:53.260]  They just sit there and ignore it so it's automatically denied.
[01:57:53.260 --> 01:57:56.260]  Talk about a due process violation.
[01:57:56.260 --> 01:57:58.260]  Oh, we don't have to do anything.
[01:57:58.260 --> 01:58:01.260]  If we just ignore all of his paperwork, it's automatically denied.
[01:58:01.260 --> 01:58:03.260]  He never gets a signed order.
[01:58:03.260 --> 01:58:05.260]  He never gets a notice of our ruling.
[01:58:05.260 --> 01:58:07.260]  He's screwed.
[01:58:07.260 --> 01:58:15.260]  But that's exactly how they play the game.
[01:58:15.260 --> 01:58:17.260]  All right, you got it?
[01:58:17.260 --> 01:58:19.260]  Thank you very much.
[01:58:19.260 --> 01:58:21.260]  All right, well, thanks for calling in.
[01:58:21.260 --> 01:58:23.260]  Hey, good luck.
[01:58:23.260 --> 01:58:25.260]  All right, Rob, I'm sorry, man.
[01:58:25.260 --> 01:58:26.260]  You called in a little bit late.
[01:58:26.260 --> 01:58:27.260]  I am out of time.
[01:58:27.260 --> 01:58:31.260]  Folks, I want to thank you so much for calling in and for listening to the show.
[01:58:31.260 --> 01:58:33.260]  We were alive tonight.
[01:58:33.260 --> 01:58:35.260]  And I want to thank you all.
[01:58:35.260 --> 01:58:38.260]  Please have a great week, good night, and God bless.
[01:59:06.260 --> 01:59:11.260]  And to know the meaning of life, order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.260 --> 01:59:20.260]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.260 --> 01:59:26.260]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:26.260 --> 01:59:30.260]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.260 --> 01:59:32.260]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.260 --> 01:59:40.260]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.260 --> 01:59:59.260]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.