[00:00.000 --> 00:05.400]  The following news flashes brought to you by The Lone Star Lowdown.
[00:05.400 --> 00:12.720]  Markets for Friday, 26 May 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,266.75 an ounce, silver
[00:12.720 --> 00:21.320]  $17.33 an ounce, Texas Crude $48.90 a barrel and Bitcoin is way up, sitting over $2,000
[00:21.320 --> 00:34.440]  U.S. currency. Today in History, the year 1868, the impeachment of Andrew Johnson ends
[00:34.440 --> 00:44.160]  with his acquittal by one vote. Today in History, in recent news, leaders of the group of seven
[00:44.160 --> 00:49.320]  or the United States, Canada, Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Japan are meeting Friday
[00:49.320 --> 00:54.840]  today for a two-day summit in Torremina, Italy. These powerhouses make up nearly 50% of the
[00:54.840 --> 00:59.760]  world economy and represent more than 60% of net global wealth. The first summit, known
[00:59.760 --> 01:06.920]  in 1975 as the G6, was attended by France, Germany, the U.S., Britain, Japan and Italy.
[01:06.920 --> 01:11.080]  Canada was later added to form the group of seven and representatives of the European
[01:11.080 --> 01:16.160]  Union have been additional participants to the summit since 1981. Focusing on the democracies
[01:16.160 --> 01:20.560]  and economies of non-communist countries, Russia was first invited as a guest observer
[01:20.560 --> 01:25.640]  in 1997 for their pro-capitalist initiatives at the time and joined in 1998 forming the
[01:25.640 --> 01:30.960]  group of eight, but was later ticked out in 2014 over the annexation of Crimea. The main
[01:30.960 --> 01:34.600]  issue for this year's meeting, climate change and whether the Trump administration will
[01:34.600 --> 01:39.520]  keep the U.S. and the Paris Climate Treaty, the conflicts in Syria and Libya, the European
[01:39.520 --> 01:49.200]  refugee crisis, North Korea's missile buildup and getting Russia to cooperate.
[01:49.200 --> 01:53.400]  This last Thursday night, Federal District Judge William Orrick of San Francisco ordered
[01:53.400 --> 01:58.320]  David Daliden, an anti-abortion activist and his attorneys to take down at least 11 names
[01:58.320 --> 02:02.840]  in several hours of video uploaded earlier this week, which was secretly filmed at two
[02:02.840 --> 02:07.720]  National Abortion Federation conferences. Judge Orrick issued an injunction last year
[02:07.720 --> 02:12.320]  barring the release of the footage and names, but an attorney defending Daliden in a separate
[02:12.320 --> 02:16.400]  criminal case posted the material on his website, arguing that it had already become part of
[02:16.400 --> 02:21.360]  public record. Daliden is also set for a hearing on June 14th to determine whether he should
[02:21.360 --> 02:25.360]  be held in contempt for the actions of his lawyer. If you recall, David's undercover
[02:25.360 --> 02:29.680]  videos made national headlines two years ago when he and others posed as representatives
[02:29.680 --> 02:35.320]  from a biomedical firm recording conversations with high-level officials at Planned Parenthood.
[02:35.320 --> 02:40.520]  This resulted in California's Attorney General Xavier Becetta earlier this year charging Daliden
[02:40.520 --> 02:46.000]  and partners with 15 felony counts of violating the privacy of health care providers by recording
[02:46.000 --> 03:09.000]  confidential information without their consent.
[03:16.000 --> 03:26.960]  Okay, Howdy Howdy, this is Randy Kelton, Rout of Law Radio, on this Friday, the 26th
[03:26.960 --> 03:36.240]  day of May 2017. And we're going to start off today with the phone lines on. So if you
[03:36.240 --> 03:44.360]  have a question or a comment, give us a call, 512-646-1984. We'll keep them on all night.
[03:44.360 --> 03:50.760]  We'll be taking your questions and comments. I'm going to start out talking about the electronic
[03:50.760 --> 04:01.040]  lawyer that I've been working on for almost 10 years now. I'm getting it put together.
[04:01.040 --> 04:06.400]  It turns out to be somewhat easier to put together than it was to figure out. But we're
[04:06.400 --> 04:16.760]  starting out with traffic tickets. And since traffic tickets is a rather focused area,
[04:16.760 --> 04:24.400]  it gives us less variables to have to deal with all at once so that we can begin to put
[04:24.400 --> 04:33.120]  all of the concepts that we've been developing over the years into practice. So we almost
[04:33.120 --> 04:39.960]  have it, we have it up and working, but it's not quite ready for prime time. If anybody
[04:39.960 --> 04:55.440]  wants to help us do a little R&D, go to www.trafficticket.website. And there's a link to get started.
[04:55.440 --> 05:02.680]  You click on that link and it'll take you to a page where you can input the information
[05:02.680 --> 05:09.760]  off of a ticket. If you don't have a ticket, just click on it and put some information
[05:09.760 --> 05:15.880]  in it. Just fake information, but like it was a real ticket. Because we want to make
[05:15.880 --> 05:22.720]  sure that all of our fields are merging the way they're supposed to. And once you've
[05:22.720 --> 05:30.160]  done that, then go back in and see if you can break it. See if you can confuse it and
[05:30.160 --> 05:37.680]  screw it up. We want to make sure that all of our error correction is in place. And if
[05:37.680 --> 05:46.400]  you do have a ticket, if you email us and let us know, we'll go ahead and run the program
[05:46.400 --> 05:51.880]  and send you all the documentation. Once we have it up working live, we're going to charge
[05:51.880 --> 05:59.720]  $50 for the front-end. And you'll get 10 documents. Right now we're not charging anything, somebody
[05:59.720 --> 06:06.200]  helps us develop the site and find all our errors. We'll download these documents and
[06:06.200 --> 06:11.000]  send them to you. On the condition that you read them over, make sure we don't have any
[06:11.000 --> 06:22.880]  screw-ups that we've missed. So what we'll do with it is in every case, there are a number
[06:22.880 --> 06:28.840]  of documents that should be filed in order to protect your rights because the courts
[06:28.840 --> 06:36.760]  have ruled that rights belong to the belligerent litigant. If you want them, come and take
[06:36.760 --> 06:44.240]  them. Well, we're going to help you come and take them. But more than that, this single
[06:44.240 --> 06:55.280]  tool here could be the one that starts a cascade of change. The reason I say that is, in Texas
[06:55.280 --> 07:05.360]  last year, there were approximately 8 million cases filed in the courts. I'm sorry, about
[07:05.360 --> 07:17.200]  8.5 million cases. There were 6.6 million of those were traffic tickets. So the vast
[07:17.200 --> 07:22.120]  majority of the population, the only interaction they have with the legal system are traffic
[07:22.120 --> 07:29.800]  tickets. And 6 million a year, that's about a quarter of the population. So we've got
[07:29.800 --> 07:36.720]  a quarter of the population a year that's being drug-in to the legal system. And for
[07:36.720 --> 07:43.080]  the most part, being drug-in, kicking and screaming. People call it into the show and
[07:43.080 --> 07:48.040]  if they are charged with a criminal act where they can be imprisoned, people are for the
[07:48.040 --> 07:53.840]  most part frightened. They're afraid of what's coming at them and they're trying to find
[07:53.840 --> 08:02.720]  answers. But when people call in about tickets, traffic tickets, they are upset. This dirty
[08:02.720 --> 08:08.280]  rotten copper wrote me this ticket. Now they're going to reach in my pocket and take my money
[08:08.280 --> 08:16.760]  out of my pocket. People are upset about that. If we want to introduce people to the legal
[08:16.760 --> 08:26.480]  system and legal reform and engage them in helping to fix the system, this is probably
[08:26.480 --> 08:32.840]  the best way to open the door for them. Most people are busy. They've got house payments,
[08:32.840 --> 08:41.160]  they've got kids, car payments, a boss they don't like, a job they hate, and they don't
[08:41.160 --> 08:47.800]  have time for what we're doing. We look for the half a percent out there that can do what
[08:47.800 --> 08:53.440]  we're doing. Well, when people get tickets, this is a good time to open their eyes and
[08:53.440 --> 09:02.160]  show them what's going on. We'll get a lot more people taking them on, even if we don't.
[09:02.160 --> 09:07.840]  The documents that we're sending will include a criminal complaint against a police officer
[09:07.840 --> 09:19.480]  for making the stop and a TECOS complaint against him. Texas Commission on Law Enforcement.
[09:19.480 --> 09:28.760]  That's the licensing agency for peace officers, similar to the bar and the commission on judicial
[09:28.760 --> 09:37.720]  conduct for lawyers and judges. If a police officer gets too many TECOS complaints, his
[09:37.720 --> 09:44.400]  insurance rating, his bond rating will go up so high he can't get hired. When he goes
[09:44.400 --> 09:51.400]  out and writes a ticket, the way his boss told him to, and then he gets a criminal complaint
[09:51.400 --> 09:58.120]  and a professional conduct complaint, he is not going to be a happy camper because now
[09:58.120 --> 10:05.240]  that's affecting his ability to continue to work. That will give the police officer plausible
[10:05.240 --> 10:12.000]  deniability to go back to his boss and say, hey, you want to write these guys' tickets?
[10:12.000 --> 10:17.520]  You go out there and write them tickets. They keep filing those complaints against me and
[10:17.520 --> 10:21.960]  I won't be able to work at all. I'll get fired because my insurance rating will go up too
[10:21.960 --> 10:34.960]  high. We could literally bring the system to its knees. This will open the door. We start
[10:34.960 --> 10:41.560]  out with a set of documents and then when we file these documents, they will mature like
[10:41.560 --> 10:49.160]  information requests. We have a couple of those. In 15 days, those mature. There's something
[10:49.160 --> 10:55.720]  else you need to do so we'll send the client a notice that that document has matured and
[10:55.720 --> 11:02.440]  then we provide them with the next document in line. The whole procedure will work this
[11:02.440 --> 11:13.000]  way and in doing this, we will gradually build up all of the questions and all of the issues
[11:13.000 --> 11:21.120]  that come up in ticket related matters. And before long, we'll have every eventuality
[11:21.120 --> 11:26.800]  that can happen in a questionnaire or have the documents ready so you can just click
[11:26.800 --> 11:32.880]  on it, download, sign and send. That includes going to include bar grievances, judicial
[11:32.880 --> 11:45.440]  conduct complaints, malpractice suits. We will inundate them. Various governments collected
[11:45.440 --> 11:52.800]  over a billion dollars from us last year in an unauthorized tax in the form of traffic
[11:52.800 --> 12:02.360]  citations. Not just that, but they were exceptionally rude and disrespectful while they're stealing
[12:02.360 --> 12:11.200]  from us. It's time to put an end to that and this may be the way to do it. We're pretty
[12:11.200 --> 12:16.560]  excited about it. It's getting close. Okay, I already have a board full of colors so I'm
[12:16.560 --> 12:23.800]  going to start out by going to Scott in Texas. Hello, Scott. Howdy, howdy. What do you have
[12:23.800 --> 12:34.120]  for us today? Well, I was talking with your buddy Ken Magnuson and he had some pretty
[12:34.120 --> 12:40.720]  interesting strategies. Yeah, he had something interesting to say to me. Did you give that
[12:40.720 --> 12:46.160]  Scott my number and he called me at 7.30 in the morning? I just had Ken chewing me all
[12:46.160 --> 12:59.480]  over the place because of you. Well, you know, it runs downhill, buddy. Okay, go ahead.
[12:59.480 --> 13:11.280]  So he's talking about chapter 16 on the examining trial and there is absolutely no reason they're
[13:11.280 --> 13:16.760]  not supposed to have these examining trials and they're all kind of saying, oh, well,
[13:16.760 --> 13:22.240]  it's not a felony so you don't get to have an examining trial, but that's not the way
[13:22.240 --> 13:30.760]  this is supposed to work. So talking about doing a different route and going after these
[13:30.760 --> 13:39.760]  guys and getting depositions from, I believe it was a 202 form or something. Texas 202
[13:39.760 --> 13:49.400]  position to preserve evidence. That's still on them. With that, get these guys in here
[13:49.400 --> 13:55.520]  to admit to everything that you're accusing them of and move for a summary judgment on
[13:55.520 --> 14:03.240]  that and then you've got to pin down and so you can go back and sue them later. Right.
[14:03.240 --> 14:09.840]  We've been ruling on that they did break the law. They didn't comply with what they
[14:09.840 --> 14:14.560]  were supposed to do and there's no wiggle room now because it's already been adjudicated.
[14:14.560 --> 14:27.240]  Yes, and the thing about the examining trial, what 1601 says is that in a matter of a felony,
[14:27.240 --> 14:36.360]  a defendant has a right to an examining trial, but there's not a period there, keeps going,
[14:36.360 --> 14:45.840]  has a right to an examining trial before an indictment. So that doesn't grant someone
[14:45.840 --> 14:53.440]  the right to a felony, to an examining trial in a felony case. It grants them a right to
[14:53.440 --> 15:02.640]  an indictment, an examining trial before an indictment can be brought. Right. So what
[15:02.640 --> 15:09.200]  they've taken is cut, done is taken the sentence in half and claimed that it said that that
[15:09.200 --> 15:17.400]  grants a right to an examining trial. Well, the right to examining trial is irrelevant
[15:17.400 --> 15:27.480]  because 1406 is very, very clear. You know, when I'm arrested, the police put the handcuffs
[15:27.480 --> 15:34.600]  on me. Well, I don't have a right to have handcuffs put on me, but they put them on me
[15:34.600 --> 15:42.360]  because the policy requires them to. I don't, doesn't matter if I have a right to an examining
[15:42.360 --> 15:52.280]  trial or not, the law specifically commands them to do it, does not say may, might or can't
[15:52.280 --> 15:58.600]  if they want to, they are required on any arrest with or without a warrant to take the
[15:58.600 --> 16:05.880]  person arrested directly to the nearest magistrate. What part of that is hard to understand has
[16:05.880 --> 16:13.360]  nothing to do with my rights. That makes sense. Yeah, not only that, it's not even wrote
[16:13.360 --> 16:19.520]  on the ticket. And from what he was telling me, it's supposed to be wrote on the ticket.
[16:19.520 --> 16:24.960]  So the ticket can even comply with its own regulations. So that means that the top wrote
[16:24.960 --> 16:32.000]  on there, the ticket is void on its face. Exactly. And that's one of the arguments we
[16:32.000 --> 16:43.200]  have in there. That's the 543 point 006. When you sign the citation, you enter into a bail
[16:43.200 --> 16:51.040]  contract, a reconnaissance bail contract, not bond, but bail, bail is a constitutional
[16:51.040 --> 16:59.720]  right. You enter into a bail contract where in you appear, you agree to appear before
[16:59.720 --> 17:15.840]  you. You'recan even eat these cookies. These are cyber cookies. No, they are cyber cookies
[17:15.840 --> 17:25.560]  and they clog up your computer. Really? Oh, that's an actual apple. I'll throw away these
[17:25.560 --> 17:31.220]  cookies in the trash. I click control, shift, delete and then scroll down to
[17:31.220 --> 17:37.380]  cookies and clear them. Bye bye yucca cookies. Now I go to logosradionetwork.com
[17:37.380 --> 17:41.820]  and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right-hand side, bookmark the link
[17:41.820 --> 17:46.980]  and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy new cookies.
[17:46.980 --> 17:52.500]  New cookies? For me? Consider it an early Christmas present and every time I order
[17:52.500 --> 17:56.340]  on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this radio
[17:56.340 --> 18:01.900]  network too. See you for cookies. See you for classified. Are you being harassed by
[18:01.900 --> 18:06.660]  debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors
[18:06.660 --> 18:11.380]  now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won six cases in
[18:11.380 --> 18:15.580]  federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll get step
[18:15.580 --> 18:20.020]  by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil
[18:20.020 --> 18:25.020]  rights statute. What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons? How to
[18:25.020 --> 18:28.820]  answer letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit
[18:28.820 --> 18:33.820]  report? How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:33.820 --> 18:38.660]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.660 --> 18:43.140]  Personal consultation is available as well. For more information please visit
[18:43.140 --> 18:47.580]  rule of law radio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email
[18:47.580 --> 18:52.660]  Michael Mears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email
[18:52.660 --> 19:17.940]  M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:17.940 --> 19:24.180]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio on this Friday the 26th day of
[19:24.180 --> 19:31.620]  May 2017 and we're talking to Scott in Texas. Okay, I ran off the cliff there at
[19:31.620 --> 19:42.940]  the end and we were talking about Bring Before Magistrate. Go ahead. Go ahead. I had
[19:42.940 --> 19:54.500]  a call today from a woman from England who she works for a company that
[19:54.500 --> 20:03.100]  does videos. They're doing TV spots and they're doing some shows and episodes
[20:03.100 --> 20:11.500]  about different lifestyles in the legal reform community in the US. And I talked
[20:11.500 --> 20:23.100]  to her and she asked me, in my opinion, what was the one issue that if I could
[20:23.100 --> 20:28.340]  change something, what would be the one thing that I would change? And I took her
[20:28.340 --> 20:35.580]  straight to Bring Before Magistrate. If there's anything that's caused the
[20:35.580 --> 20:41.780]  deterioration of the system, that is it. If we get that replaced, most of the
[20:41.780 --> 20:45.580]  problems we're having with the system will take care of themselves.
[20:45.580 --> 20:52.780]  Policemen acting ignorant and careless, that will stop when that policeman, if he
[20:52.780 --> 20:57.500]  arrests you, has to take you directly to the nearest magistrate and explain
[20:57.500 --> 21:04.940]  himself. He will get a lot more careful about how he behaves. And you will get
[21:04.940 --> 21:13.060]  opportunity to tell your side and give expropriatory evidence. I talked to
[21:13.060 --> 21:21.020]  police officers, to magistrates, to prosecutors, ask all of them, would you
[21:21.020 --> 21:25.620]  have any problem with a policeman taking someone directly to the nearest
[21:25.620 --> 21:30.020]  magistrate? Ask the police, would you have any problem if you arrest somebody
[21:30.020 --> 21:35.060]  taking him to the magistrate? And they said absolutely not. It wouldn't bother them at
[21:35.060 --> 21:40.140]  all, because for the most part they have good reason to arrest. And they'd be glad
[21:40.140 --> 21:44.220]  to go to the magistrate and explain themselves. I asked the magistrate, would
[21:44.220 --> 21:49.620]  you have a problem doing the examining trials for people who've been arrested?
[21:49.620 --> 21:54.260]  Even if you have to have to stop or proceed. And all of them said they
[21:54.260 --> 21:59.260]  wouldn't have a problem with that at all. I asked the prosecutors, when I asked my
[21:59.260 --> 22:04.220]  prosecutor in Wise County, he said, heck no, I wouldn't have a problem. They'd get
[22:04.220 --> 22:08.740]  rid of a lot of these junk cases and I wouldn't even have to mess with them.
[22:08.740 --> 22:18.460]  Everybody wins. Everybody does better if we have examining trials. So why aren't
[22:18.460 --> 22:25.380]  they doing it? Exactly. There's a monetary driven reason behind it that's
[22:25.380 --> 22:32.460]  generating revenue for the county, designed as an engine of plunder.
[22:32.460 --> 22:39.180]  Exactly. They want to frighten you into taking a deal when the prosecutor
[22:39.180 --> 22:44.100]  offers it. If they take you before a magistrate and demonstrate that you got
[22:44.100 --> 22:48.540]  rights and you can exercise those rights, you're not so likely to lay down and roll
[22:48.540 --> 22:54.020]  over for them. But if they take you to jail and run you through that booking
[22:54.020 --> 22:59.900]  process, that degrading booking process, order you around, make you change into
[22:59.900 --> 23:06.180]  this orange uniform and throw you in a jail cell, now they got your attention.
[23:06.180 --> 23:11.660]  Now when they come to you and tell you all the horrible things they're going to
[23:11.660 --> 23:20.220]  do to you if you don't take this deal, 99.6% take the deal. In the state of Texas,
[23:20.220 --> 23:29.260]  if you are accused of crime, 99.6% of the people plead guilty. This is the worst
[23:29.260 --> 23:40.340]  police state the world has ever seen bar none. The United States has about 3% of
[23:40.340 --> 23:46.980]  the world's population. We house approximately 50% of the world's
[23:46.980 --> 23:53.660]  population of inmates. It is the worst police state the world's ever seen and
[23:53.660 --> 23:59.300]  it's a horrible drag on our economy. At 30,000 a year for each one of those
[23:59.300 --> 24:03.980]  inmates and the vast majority should not be in there dragging down our economy.
[24:03.980 --> 24:09.260]  Agreed. We start bringing them before magistrates, a lot of that will stop.
[24:09.260 --> 24:15.860]  We're going to stop the ticket debacle because we're going to start bringing
[24:15.860 --> 24:21.780]  these judges and police officers and prosecutors before magistrates or before
[24:21.780 --> 24:27.260]  grand juries and let them explain themselves to a grand jury of our
[24:27.260 --> 24:36.660]  peers, not their peers. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. Well, I say we're
[24:36.660 --> 24:43.140]  going to start filing lawsuits on these people and start holding them
[24:43.140 --> 24:47.860]  accountable in district court. They start getting some rulings on them like that
[24:47.860 --> 24:54.500]  and then, you know, some of these really rank ones. Take them to federal court
[24:54.500 --> 25:00.060]  after we do the depositions and get it all kind of summed up like that. It's
[25:00.060 --> 25:04.940]  like, hey, we got all this already. We have passed judgment. This is just
[25:04.940 --> 25:10.500]  evidence, more evidence because a couple of the cases that I'm doing are pretty
[25:10.500 --> 25:16.820]  complex, you know, going after a county judge and his vicarious liability. Pretty
[25:16.820 --> 25:26.420]  tough to prove, so kind of prove a lot of a willful intent of denying due
[25:26.420 --> 25:34.780]  process. That's not as hard as it would sound, you know, from someone who
[25:34.780 --> 25:43.700]  trusts the system to say that you go after a county commissioners court judge
[25:43.700 --> 25:49.820]  because they didn't ensure proper training of public officials to ensure
[25:49.820 --> 25:55.780]  due process. You know what I think? That's really hard to prove. Well, actually, it's not.
[25:55.780 --> 26:05.460]  Everything they do is illegal. Every step from arrest to trial. So, proving violations
[26:05.460 --> 26:12.300]  of due process piece of cake. So, it's hard, you know, if you get pulled over, you
[26:12.300 --> 26:17.220]  don't know anything about all this stuff. You don't know all the ins and outs. You
[26:17.220 --> 26:22.380]  don't understand the politics. It's overwhelming. So, we're building this site
[26:22.380 --> 26:30.140]  that does know all about all this stuff. And it asks you questions and sorts out
[26:30.140 --> 26:37.540]  your issues. And this is not as hard as lawyers want you to think it is because
[26:37.540 --> 26:42.780]  you open this site and we already know you have a traffic ticket. The first
[26:42.780 --> 26:51.060]  question we answer you, ask you, is going to cut the whole body of law relating to
[26:51.060 --> 26:58.460]  tickets in half. And the next one's going to cut it in half again. And we chunk it
[26:58.460 --> 27:04.980]  down till we only isolate the issues that matter to you. So, it's not near so
[27:04.980 --> 27:15.620]  complex. And this is not hard computer. So, once we've written a lawsuit, we've
[27:15.620 --> 27:22.540]  got the basic format because the tickets, they're all basically the same. They do
[27:22.540 --> 27:29.180]  the same process to everybody. So, we make up these lawsuits and you ask these,
[27:29.180 --> 27:34.660]  answering these questions, depending on your answer determines what the
[27:34.660 --> 27:40.940]  system drops in the lawsuit. It just spits it out. You sign it and send it. You
[27:40.940 --> 27:48.900]  don't have to know all this stuff. The computer does. Oh, yeah. Well, it's going
[27:48.900 --> 27:52.620]  to be with a real process of law. It's supposed to be. And it'll wake a lot of
[27:52.620 --> 27:58.020]  people up. Boy, it really isn't once you step in there. So, and these people are
[27:58.020 --> 28:05.060]  violating the law every step of the way. And you get to see a first hand that
[28:05.060 --> 28:10.260]  in justice of them all. That's why they have to be sued because we're going to
[28:10.260 --> 28:16.060]  have to start taking them to court and putting them in front of a jury that way
[28:16.060 --> 28:21.860]  because it's the only way we can really start wearing them out. And that's just
[28:21.860 --> 28:27.500]  what's going to have to happen. That's my story and I'm sure. When you should, we've
[28:27.500 --> 28:36.700]  got 6.6 million tickets written a year in Texas. 73% of the people pay the ticket
[28:36.700 --> 28:44.980]  without going to court. The rest of them plead not guilty. We'll get those guys.
[28:44.980 --> 28:50.860]  When we contact them and say, here's how you fight this thing. Here's all the
[28:50.860 --> 28:56.700]  documents you need. All you got to do is download Simon Sint. Well, if we can get
[28:56.700 --> 29:07.140]  10% filing these documents, we will shut traffic enforcement down completely.
[29:07.140 --> 29:13.460]  They absolutely will not be able to function and we can do that. And when we
[29:13.460 --> 29:18.900]  shut traffic enforcement down and then go after criminal, criminal will be the
[29:18.900 --> 29:25.700]  next expansion of this. And then the next one we plan on is family law.
[29:25.700 --> 29:31.820]  You're going to a family law case and you don't know how to protect your
[29:31.820 --> 29:38.500]  rights. You don't know what all needs to be filed. And your lawyer, he's got set
[29:38.500 --> 29:44.220]  things he wants to do and that's all he's going to do. He will throw you under
[29:44.220 --> 29:50.660]  the bus. What they do in family law is you got a lawyer on each side. Both of
[29:50.660 --> 29:58.780]  them look at your estate and they try to decide how much of your estate they
[29:58.780 --> 30:00.820]  can use.
[30:01.820 --> 30:06.980]  Mmm, warm cookies and milk. What a great combination. But cookies and the internet
[30:06.980 --> 30:11.420]  are a recipe for privacy invasion. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back
[30:11.420 --> 30:14.900]  to tell you why you should regularly delete cookies from your computer in
[30:14.900 --> 30:20.620]  just a moment. Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself
[30:20.620 --> 30:24.820]  you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone you'll find your
[30:24.820 --> 30:29.340]  freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to
[30:29.340 --> 30:34.140]  surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging
[30:34.140 --> 30:36.940]  on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by
[30:36.940 --> 30:42.060]  startpage.com. The private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing.
[30:42.060 --> 30:48.340]  Start over with Start Page. Cookies are bits of data stored on your computer's
[30:48.340 --> 30:52.620]  hard drive when you visit a website. Some cookies are harmless but many websites
[30:52.620 --> 30:56.500]  use so-called tracking cookies that can monitor your internet behavior and
[30:56.500 --> 31:01.100]  create a profile of you secretly. This is especially problematic when you're
[31:01.100 --> 31:05.060]  tracked at search engines like Google or Bing. Your search records can reveal a
[31:05.060 --> 31:08.540]  shocking amount of personal information like your interests, your medical
[31:08.540 --> 31:12.580]  conditions and more. You can configure your browser to automatically delete
[31:12.580 --> 31:16.380]  cookies or never accept them in the first place. There are also programs for
[31:16.380 --> 31:20.460]  deleting trickier tracking cookies called flash cookies. I'm Dr. Catherine
[31:20.460 --> 31:24.420]  Albrecht, encouraging smart surfing and use of more privacy-friendly websites
[31:24.420 --> 31:27.380]  like startpage.com. More news and information at
[31:27.380 --> 31:57.340]  CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:58.060 --> 32:00.540]  Only.
[32:01.660 --> 32:05.540]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law Traffic Seminar. In today's
[32:05.540 --> 32:08.780]  America we live in an us against them society. If we the people are ever going
[32:08.780 --> 32:11.860]  to have a free society then we're going to have to stand in and defend our own
[32:11.860 --> 32:15.180]  rights. Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:15.180 --> 32:18.220]  the right to act in our own private capacity and most importantly the right
[32:18.220 --> 32:21.620]  to due process of law. Traffic courts afford us the least expensive
[32:21.620 --> 32:24.660]  opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due
[32:24.660 --> 32:28.660]  process. Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio has
[32:28.660 --> 32:32.160]  put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand
[32:32.160 --> 32:36.180]  what due process is and how to hold reports to the rule of law. You can get your own copy
[32:36.180 --> 32:41.020]  of this valuable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering
[32:41.020 --> 32:44.660]  now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book The Texas Transportation Code, The Law vs.
[32:44.660 --> 32:48.940]  the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar. Hundreds of research documents
[32:48.940 --> 32:52.220]  and other useful resource material. Learn how to fight for your rights with the help
[32:52.220 --> 32:56.460]  of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can
[32:56.460 --> 32:59.220]  have free society we all want and deserve.
[32:59.220 --> 33:10.220]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[33:10.220 --> 33:21.220]  Yeah, I got that one rent and I'm going to solve that.
[33:21.220 --> 33:28.900]  UK, we are back. We're in the Kelton Rule of Law Radio and talking to Scott in Texas.
[33:28.900 --> 33:34.900]  And what the lawyers do is they look at your estate, they decide how much of your estate
[33:34.900 --> 33:40.980]  they can swallow before you start getting real upset and filing criminal complaints against
[33:40.980 --> 33:49.820]  them. And then the lawyers start filing motions and back and forth. One will file a motion,
[33:49.820 --> 33:55.460]  the other will answer a motion, build a client. And the other one will file a motion, opposite
[33:55.460 --> 34:00.660]  will answer, they build a client. Well, they got all these motions in their files. So we've
[34:00.660 --> 34:04.500]  got them made up, they just pull them out, change the names on them. And then they charge
[34:04.500 --> 34:12.300]  you as if they made up the motion from scratch until they've used up your retainer. And then
[34:12.300 --> 34:15.820]  they ask for it, they generally ask for a retainer that's about as much as they think
[34:15.820 --> 34:24.820]  they can steal from you. And in family law, they try to get you and your ex at each other's
[34:24.820 --> 34:28.940]  throat so they get you good and angry. So when they ask for more money, you'll keep
[34:28.940 --> 34:35.020]  up in the money until you run out and then they throw you under the bus. That may not
[34:35.020 --> 34:42.020]  be right, but that's how it works. So we'll get a set of motions and pleadings set up
[34:42.020 --> 34:49.820]  for family law. And these motions and pleadings were all the issues that you need to have
[34:49.820 --> 34:55.140]  addressed going in so you have the case set up right. These lawyers are not going to do
[34:55.140 --> 35:01.740]  that because they want to mitigate the case. You get all of these, you file them, then
[35:01.740 --> 35:08.580]  you hire a lawyer. Now the lawyer comes in, he's already got these documents in the case
[35:08.580 --> 35:16.740]  that now he has to adjudicate. But then again, he can adjudicate them without being so concerned
[35:16.740 --> 35:22.220]  about making a mistake or missing something because he didn't file them. So he doesn't
[35:22.220 --> 35:27.260]  have to worry about the judge sanctioning him. And he had left the judge to know that
[35:27.260 --> 35:32.260]  he didn't file these, he inherited them, so he has plausible deniability. Works better
[35:32.260 --> 35:42.620]  for everybody. We'll get this done for all of these cases. And then as secondary issues
[35:42.620 --> 35:48.860]  come up, we'll make up questions for those, fill in all the blanks, write the motions
[35:48.860 --> 35:54.960]  and pleadings, and set up the system to fill in the blanks with the answers. And the pros
[35:54.960 --> 36:06.220]  say we'll be able to go in with the accumulated expertise of all these lawyers. And the lawyers
[36:06.220 --> 36:15.700]  for their part, they'll buy our motions from us because we build motions that we spend
[36:15.700 --> 36:22.380]  a lot of time on them, we make sure that when we create the motion for the individual, there
[36:22.380 --> 36:28.580]  are no typos, there are no miscited cases. Those kind of things, there's nothing, it
[36:28.580 --> 36:33.300]  doesn't forget anything. That's the kind of thing that gets a lawyer in trouble more
[36:33.300 --> 36:38.340]  than anything. He tells the paralegal how to do it and the paralegal screws it up and
[36:38.340 --> 36:45.100]  the lawyer gets in trouble. We're using electronic paralegal, you don't forget anything. So they
[36:45.100 --> 36:51.900]  can adjudicate with a lot more confidence. So they'll buy our documents so that they
[36:51.900 --> 37:00.580]  have all of the issues available and don't miss anything. And it's purchasing our documents
[37:00.580 --> 37:07.340]  that's going to put them out of business. Because we then, we take all of the new issues
[37:07.340 --> 37:12.860]  that come up and we have the lawyers help us fill in any blanks that are left. And then
[37:12.860 --> 37:21.060]  we make these documents available to the procé so the procé can come in with the same documentation
[37:21.060 --> 37:28.820]  and thoroughness as the lawyer. We will eliminate the profession of lawyer and get lawyers to
[37:28.820 --> 37:34.660]  pay us to do it. This is going to be way too much fun. Do you have anything else for us,
[37:34.660 --> 37:40.260]  Scott? No, I just have some formatting questions on a document but I'll just have to call you
[37:40.260 --> 37:44.340]  about that in the morning or something. So other than that, I'll let you get to the next
[37:44.340 --> 37:47.540]  caller. Okay, Scott and I went over, he's producing
[37:47.540 --> 37:54.260]  some pretty good documents and I had a good session today because I didn't have to go
[37:54.260 --> 38:01.300]  through a bunch of basic minor stuff. I got to talk about a lot more sophisticated things
[38:01.300 --> 38:06.140]  that he was doing that we could adjust and change and increase the sophistication and
[38:06.140 --> 38:13.500]  I like doing that. Scott's coming up to speed very quickly. So yes, we can talk in the
[38:13.500 --> 38:21.180]  morning and handle your questions. We hope we get a real serious document out there but
[38:21.180 --> 38:28.740]  and I need Scott to get it done very well. I need it very well constructed so I can
[38:28.740 --> 38:41.340]  please your riser. Because that's the kind of guy I am. Okay, thank you, Scott. Okay,
[38:41.340 --> 38:50.900]  now we're going to Mauricio in Texas. Did I pronounce that right? Yes, sir, Randy, Mauricio.
[38:50.900 --> 38:57.540]  How are you doing, brother? I'm doing good. Great, that's great. Hey, Randy, two parts
[38:57.540 --> 39:03.420]  for my call. One, I'm kind of wanting your opinion on something. I don't know if you
[39:03.420 --> 39:12.620]  heard, but down here in Corpus Christi, the main seat for Noesis County, one of the municipality
[39:12.620 --> 39:20.340]  judges was suspended for 90 days. That way she could get her U.S. citizenship and they
[39:20.340 --> 39:26.380]  also released a notice saying that all of her judgments would stand. I guess I was calling
[39:26.380 --> 39:32.820]  about your opinion on that if you had heard about it. No, I hadn't heard about it. Is
[39:32.820 --> 39:41.660]  there a requirement that you be a U.S. citizen in order to be a judge? Oh, I personally don't
[39:41.660 --> 39:48.780]  know that. I don't know that there is. I've never seen one. There may be, but it's not
[39:48.780 --> 39:55.860]  an issue I've ever addressed. Yeah, I figured it was not a common thing. That's why I'd
[39:55.860 --> 40:02.140]  give you a call if Stevie had heard about that. No, I hadn't heard anything about that.
[40:02.140 --> 40:12.460]  A municipal judge who's not a citizen. Yeah. Well, a municipal judge, that's not necessarily
[40:12.460 --> 40:18.940]  a problem because a municipal judge, unless it's a court of record, does not necessarily
[40:18.940 --> 40:31.340]  have to be a lawyer. So just an ordinary person can be a municipal judge. Before they can
[40:31.340 --> 40:34.620]  sit on the bench, there's certain training they have to go through, but they don't have
[40:34.620 --> 40:40.060]  to be a lawyer. Fair enough, fair enough. Now, I guess the
[40:40.060 --> 40:50.140]  root of the rubies that I called, back in January of 2015, my sister divorced her husband
[40:50.140 --> 40:56.660]  or she was, she left him, moved into my house, brought the kids in with us. And the guy broke
[40:56.660 --> 41:05.100]  into the house, assaulted her. I ended up jumping in to protect her. He assaulted me, ended
[41:05.100 --> 41:12.580]  up leaving and stole her purse, used her credit card to pay outstanding tickets and stuff
[41:12.580 --> 41:19.900]  like that. Anyways, they ended up pressing charges on them barely. Let's say it was in
[41:19.900 --> 41:24.460]  November before he had statute limitations because I went in, asked them on the status
[41:24.460 --> 41:30.180]  of the case. They thanked me for reminding them about it and then they hit him with charges.
[41:30.180 --> 41:36.900]  They brought the charges as to breaking them in three with intent to commit bodily harm
[41:36.900 --> 41:43.140]  and robbery. Well, later that night that he actually did all that, he continued to call
[41:43.140 --> 41:48.700]  the house and cell phones and such forth. So we called the police again to file a phone
[41:48.700 --> 41:53.380]  harassment charge because he would keep calling. And as a matter of fact, even the officer
[41:53.380 --> 41:58.580]  who came to take the report got on the phone with him and told him to quit calling, hung
[41:58.580 --> 42:03.420]  up, kept calling again, and the advice the cop gave us was just to leave the phones off
[42:03.420 --> 42:04.420]  the hook.
[42:04.420 --> 42:11.380]  Well, the reason why I'm telling you all of this is because those phone harassment charges
[42:11.380 --> 42:16.580]  I just found out never went through the county attorney. The investigator said that there
[42:16.580 --> 42:22.780]  was enough to go through just the county attorney would have to proceed with it. Well, as of
[42:22.780 --> 42:28.140]  January this year, it hit statute limitations. Nothing ever transpired from it. And it turns
[42:28.140 --> 42:35.980]  out the county attorney is sister to his attorney. He'd be in my sister's ex-husband
[42:35.980 --> 42:46.860]  who has divorced the attorney and the attorney fighting the federal case right now.
[42:46.860 --> 42:55.860]  That's not an issue. The reason it's not an issue is these lawyers are all part of
[42:55.860 --> 43:03.540]  the same fraternity. They all know each other. They work together. They go to school together.
[43:03.540 --> 43:09.780]  They go to the same places, the same seminars and such. So they interact with one another
[43:09.780 --> 43:19.340]  all the time. So the fact that there are these kinds of inner relationships is not necessarily
[43:19.340 --> 43:30.780]  an issue. Unless you could go to the prosecutor and make the claim that he shielded this person
[43:30.780 --> 43:42.940]  from prosecution because his sister was the guy's attorney. But it'll look bad for the
[43:42.940 --> 43:51.020]  lawyer. But technically, unless you could show something specific, there is no wrong
[43:51.020 --> 44:13.540]  in doing just because that relationship exists. It's the 2017 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser
[44:13.540 --> 44:19.540]  sponsored by Central Texas Gun Works. Defense distributed in Fatsal's, Delhi. Go to logosradionetwork.com
[44:19.540 --> 44:26.700]  to purchase a Spike's tactical AR-15. Second place, Taurus PT-111 G2 9mm pistol. From Defense
[44:26.700 --> 44:34.100]  distributed, third place, the AR-308 80% lower. Fourth place, the AR-15 8% lower. From Fatsal's,
[44:34.100 --> 44:40.580]  Delhi. Fifth place, $100 gift card for Fatsal's, Delhi. Every $25 donation is a chance to win.
[44:40.580 --> 44:46.360]  That's logosradionetwork.com. Also, if you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal 101,
[44:46.360 --> 44:50.820]  you get four chances to win. Purchase Eddie Craig's traffic seminar, get ten chances
[44:50.820 --> 44:56.900]  to win. And remember, every $25 donation is a chance to win. Go to logosradionetwork.com
[44:56.900 --> 45:04.740]  for details and donate today. Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your
[45:04.740 --> 45:10.460]  case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD
[45:10.460 --> 45:17.460]  course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. If you have a lawyer, know what
[45:17.460 --> 45:22.460]  your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for
[45:22.460 --> 45:28.980]  yourself. Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary
[45:28.980 --> 45:35.020]  was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. Even if
[45:35.020 --> 45:40.100]  you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles
[45:40.100 --> 45:45.980]  and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video
[45:45.980 --> 45:53.180]  seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit
[45:53.180 --> 46:17.260]  ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:17.260 --> 46:23.620]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, rule of law radio. We're talking to Mauricio in Texas.
[46:23.620 --> 46:40.100]  Yeah, it may not be improper, but at the end of the day, if it looks bad, what's the word?
[46:40.100 --> 46:47.220]  Keep losing words. My mother tells me that's not going to get better. Perception is a
[46:47.220 --> 46:57.820]  different thing. So if you can make it look bad, that's enough. Okay. Now, all that other
[46:57.820 --> 47:06.980]  aside, the fact that she didn't pursue the case, isn't that a violation of her duties?
[47:06.980 --> 47:13.380]  Technically it is, but the courts have granted the prosecutors a certain amount of discretion.
[47:13.380 --> 47:22.420]  Now here is the problem. When you gave the complaint to the police officer under 2.13
[47:22.420 --> 47:29.660]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the police officer was required to present the complaint
[47:29.660 --> 47:38.540]  to some magistrate, not to the prosecuting attorney. So there you can go in and sting
[47:38.540 --> 47:47.940]  the police officer for not giving the complaint to a magistrate the way he's required to.
[47:47.940 --> 47:55.500]  And if the police officer tells you that they're following directions or they're following
[47:55.500 --> 48:07.820]  policy, then you can presume that the policy was either upset by or condoned by the prosecuting
[48:07.820 --> 48:18.420]  attorney. And that goes to legal advice. Now what is the cool thing about legal advice?
[48:18.420 --> 48:30.340]  No immunity. So you can sue the prosecuting attorney for giving improper legal advice
[48:30.340 --> 48:37.140]  to members of the prosecutor team, the police, advising them to bring their complaints to
[48:37.140 --> 48:43.380]  the prosecutor instead of presenting them to some magistrate the way 2.13 commands him
[48:43.380 --> 48:50.780]  to do. And then bar grieve him on top of it. That'll make him really, really unhappy.
[48:50.780 --> 49:03.180]  That's good. I like that role. Before you can sue a public official, you have to give
[49:03.180 --> 49:10.060]  them notice and opportunity in the form of a tort letter. So you send a letter to the
[49:10.060 --> 49:16.340]  prosecutor and tell the prosecutor that you have harmed me. You have denied me the equal
[49:16.340 --> 49:24.140]  protection of the laws by improperly advising the police to bring criminal complaints to
[49:24.140 --> 49:35.060]  you instead of some magistrate. And you've harmed me in X amount. Make me wholly be sued.
[49:35.060 --> 49:39.340]  He's going to look at that and he's going to know that you just walked right around
[49:39.340 --> 49:49.620]  his sovereign immunity. You got a shot at him personally. Now he is going to be a really
[49:49.620 --> 49:56.620]  unhappy camper. A good chance in order to keep you from suing him, he might go ahead
[49:56.620 --> 50:05.660]  and pick up these charges and go after this guy. Certainly, if the person does this subsequent
[50:05.660 --> 50:12.900]  to your filing the complaint, the police are going to claim that they have no duty to protect
[50:12.900 --> 50:20.740]  you. And that's true. They don't. But they do have a duty to enforce law and follow
[50:20.740 --> 50:30.900]  law. If the officer fails to follow law and you are harmed at all, then you get to sue
[50:30.900 --> 50:37.380]  the officer and you get to sue the prosecutor because the officer is part of the prosecutor
[50:37.380 --> 50:44.420]  team. And you sue the prosecutor because he advised the policeman or condoned the policeman
[50:44.420 --> 50:53.300]  in an improper practice. That sounds like fun. That sounds like a black. Although the
[50:53.300 --> 50:59.180]  prosecutor unfortunately lost re-election, so she's no longer the prosecutor. Oh, he's
[50:59.180 --> 51:07.540]  even better to go after. There you go. Yeah, you filed a suit against him. You give him
[51:07.540 --> 51:15.820]  notice of tort and he's likely to ignore it. And then you sue him. They'll cancel his
[51:15.820 --> 51:24.460]  malpractice insurance. Oh, he will get. And then the new prosecutor will see you beating
[51:24.460 --> 51:33.020]  up the old prosecutor and he's not going to want you to be him up that way. It's all
[51:33.020 --> 51:41.420]  politics. If you sue the old prosecutor, the new prosecutor has plausible deniability.
[51:41.420 --> 51:49.340]  He can do his job and save face. Saving face is really important. So you give him an opportunity
[51:49.340 --> 51:55.940]  to do it right, make sure you don't come after him. He doesn't have to admit that he did it
[51:55.940 --> 52:01.380]  right because he was afraid you would come after him. He can claim he did it right just
[52:01.380 --> 52:08.740]  because it was the right thing to do and I'm a good guy. Well, we know that's horse manure,
[52:08.740 --> 52:20.540]  but we let him save face. Does that make sense? Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. Okay, so do you
[52:20.540 --> 52:26.620]  have anything else for us? No, sir. I'll start off with the criminal complaining like he
[52:26.620 --> 52:32.060]  said with the officer and work up from there. I appreciate it. Oh, and have fun following
[52:32.060 --> 52:42.260]  the routine. We'll do it. It's always been fun before. Okay. Thank you, Mauricio. Okay,
[52:42.260 --> 52:56.900]  now we're going to go to John in Pennsylvania. Hello, John. Hello, John. It looks like we
[52:56.900 --> 53:02.260]  may have lost John. Sometimes when people come up on the board and they're waiting, their
[53:02.260 --> 53:09.500]  phone will drop and we can't always tell. Or sometimes I just put them to sleep. I seem
[53:09.500 --> 53:16.260]  to have that problem. Okay, we are going to go to Barrett in Arizona. Hello, Barrett.
[53:16.260 --> 53:26.780]  Yeah, hi. Yeah, I have a question. What does Randy Kelton do when he gets pulled over?
[53:26.780 --> 53:33.820]  Do you have plates? Do you say when they ask you for ID and proof of insurance, do you
[53:33.820 --> 53:42.580]  just give them a regular state ID or do you just give them a remain silent? No, I don't
[53:42.580 --> 53:48.260]  argue with them on the side of the street. I give them what they ask for. I've got plates
[53:48.260 --> 53:58.140]  on my car and since I have a driver's license and I have commercial plates on my vehicle,
[53:58.140 --> 54:04.820]  when I signed up for those commercial plates, I agreed to allow the police to stop me without
[54:04.820 --> 54:12.740]  probable cause under the transportation code and even to search my vehicle. That's in the
[54:12.740 --> 54:22.420]  contract I signed with them. However, in this case, it is stopped. So if I get plates, if
[54:22.420 --> 54:27.420]  I get plates, am I admitting that I am engaged in a commercial activity? See, the reason
[54:27.420 --> 54:33.100]  I don't want to go without plates is because, well, the reason I don't want to go without
[54:33.100 --> 54:38.460]  plates is because I'll probably get pulled over every other day and I don't want to have
[54:38.460 --> 54:46.340]  to put some plate that just says private. I don't have a license in any state so I can't
[54:46.340 --> 54:50.540]  just show them. But I do want to kind of get plates because I want to be able to ensure
[54:50.540 --> 54:55.220]  my motorcycle because somebody runs into the back of me. I want to get uninsured motors
[54:55.220 --> 55:00.820]  covered on my bike and as soon as possible.
[55:00.820 --> 55:08.020]  I don't think you'll be able to get insurance directly on the motorcycle if you can't produce
[55:08.020 --> 55:19.620]  a valid license. However, certain homeowner's policies will cover your motorcycle.
[55:19.620 --> 55:24.380]  The reason you should just go without plates because I don't have a driver's license.
[55:24.380 --> 55:29.860]  Well, you can go without plates and you can make those arguments. I prefer not to fight
[55:29.860 --> 55:34.380]  it that way. The way I want to fight it...
[55:34.380 --> 55:40.060]  So, here's one. If I get plates, am I pretty much agreeing to, hey, if I get pulled over,
[55:40.060 --> 55:44.260]  I'm going to have to show a license. I can't say I'm going to remain silent.
[55:44.260 --> 55:53.380]  Yes, you can remain silent. Okay, hold on. Stop. You're running too fast. Stop. I'm trying
[55:53.380 --> 56:03.220]  to tell you how this works. The only police in Texas who can stop you under the Texas
[56:03.220 --> 56:11.380]  Transportation Code or Highway Patrol, period. That police... I just had one write me a ticket.
[56:11.380 --> 56:17.500]  First ticket had gotten ages in Highland Park, Texas. The guy was fine and pleasant and he
[56:17.500 --> 56:25.020]  wrote me a ticket. He asked me if he said your license is expired. I said, yeah, but
[56:25.020 --> 56:35.340]  only for a year and a half. They wrote me a ticket for it and speeded. I didn't give
[56:35.340 --> 56:44.180]  him any legal advice other than to tell him that, now, don't take anything I'm going to
[56:44.180 --> 56:50.420]  do personally because nothing I'm going to do when I get to court is going to be personal.
[56:50.420 --> 56:58.100]  He said, oh, I won't. Okay. I will be filing against him first degree felony aggravated
[56:58.100 --> 57:08.220]  assault. This is how I get there. When the officer turned his emergency lights on, he
[57:08.220 --> 57:16.100]  gave the impression of declaring an emergency. Under Texas law, I'm required to either move
[57:16.100 --> 57:22.860]  over one lane or slow down 20 miles an hour. If I do either one of those and the officer
[57:22.860 --> 57:32.380]  doesn't pull around me, then he's not declaring an emergency. He's stopping me under 545.421
[57:32.380 --> 57:41.100]  Texas transportation code. Well, if he is a municipal officer, he has no power to stop
[57:41.100 --> 57:50.260]  me under the transportation code. He is exerting or purporting to exerting authority he does
[57:50.260 --> 57:58.020]  not have. When he turns those lights on, he arrests my freedom of movement and seizes
[57:58.020 --> 58:05.460]  me for purposes of fourth amendment. He does so while acting under the color of or pretense
[58:05.460 --> 58:11.940]  of an official capacity. That is a class A misdemeanor official oppression in the state
[58:11.940 --> 58:21.540]  of Texas. Except that he is impersonating a police officer. In Texas, we have peace
[58:21.540 --> 58:30.100]  officers and police officers. A peace officer is certified to enforce the criminal code.
[58:30.100 --> 58:37.100]  A police officer is authorized to enforce the transportation code. About to go to break.
[58:37.100 --> 58:40.980]  We'll pick this up on the other side. Randy Kelton, the real law radio. A calling number
[58:40.980 --> 58:52.620]  512-646-1984. We'll be right back. Would you like to make more definite progress
[58:52.620 --> 58:58.580]  in your walk with God? Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of
[58:58.580 --> 59:02.980]  free Christian books that can really help. The New Testament recovery version is one
[59:02.980 --> 59:07.980]  of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today. It's an accurate translation and it
[59:07.980 --> 59:12.400]  contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning
[59:12.400 --> 59:16.060]  of life. The free books are a three volume set called
[59:16.060 --> 59:21.060]  Basic Elements of the Christian Life. Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:21.060 --> 59:27.020]  Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the
[59:27.020 --> 59:33.020]  church. To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian
[59:33.020 --> 59:45.820]  Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102. Or visit
[59:45.820 --> 01:00:00.660]  us online at bfa.org. Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.660 --> 01:00:05.900]  To follow in these flashes brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdowns. Markets for Friday
[01:00:05.900 --> 01:00:13.900]  the 26th of May 2017 are currently trading with gold at $1,266.75 an ounce, silver $17.33
[01:00:13.900 --> 01:00:23.460]  an ounce, Texas crude $48.90 a barrel and Bitcoin is way up sitting over $2,000 at $2,214 U.S.
[01:00:23.460 --> 01:00:32.940]  currency. Today in History, the year 1868, the impeachment
[01:00:32.940 --> 01:00:41.900]  of Andrew Johnson ends with his acquittal by one vote. Today in History.
[01:00:41.900 --> 01:00:46.820]  In recent news, leaders of the Group of Seven or the United States, Canada, Britain, France,
[01:00:46.820 --> 01:00:52.860]  Germany, Italy and Japan are meeting Friday today for a two day summit in Taramina, Italy.
[01:00:52.860 --> 01:00:57.260]  These powerhouses make up nearly 50% of the world economy and represent more than 60%
[01:00:57.260 --> 01:01:01.980]  of net global wealth. The first summit, known in 1975 as the G6,
[01:01:01.980 --> 01:01:07.340]  was attended by France, Germany, the U.S., Britain, Japan and Italy. Canada was later
[01:01:07.340 --> 01:01:12.060]  added to form the Group of Seven and representatives of the European Union have been additional
[01:01:12.060 --> 01:01:17.740]  participants to the summit since 1981. Focusing on the democracies and economies of non-communist
[01:01:17.740 --> 01:01:22.700]  countries, Russia was first invited as a guest observer in 1997 for their pro-capitalist
[01:01:22.700 --> 01:01:27.420]  initiatives at the time and joined in 1998 forming the Group of Eight but was later kicked
[01:01:27.420 --> 01:01:32.720]  out in 2014 over the annexation of Crimea. The main issue for this year's meeting, climate
[01:01:32.720 --> 01:01:37.180]  change and whether the Trump administration will keep the U.S. and the Paris Climate Treaty,
[01:01:37.180 --> 01:01:42.420]  the conflicts in Syria and Libya, the European refugee crisis, North Korea's missile buildup
[01:01:42.420 --> 01:01:50.980]  and getting Russia to cooperate. This last Thursday night, Federal District
[01:01:50.980 --> 01:01:56.140]  Judge William Orrick of San Francisco ordered David Daliden, an anti-abortion activist and
[01:01:56.140 --> 01:02:00.660]  his attorneys to take down at least 11 names in several hours of video uploaded earlier
[01:02:00.660 --> 01:02:05.700]  this week which was secretly filmed at two National Abortion Federation conferences.
[01:02:05.700 --> 01:02:09.700]  Judge Orrick issued an injunction last year barring the release of the footage and names
[01:02:09.700 --> 01:02:14.820]  but an attorney defending Daliden in a separate criminal case posted the material on his website
[01:02:14.820 --> 01:02:19.100]  arguing that it had already become part of public record. Daliden is also set for a hearing
[01:02:19.100 --> 01:02:23.340]  on June 14th to determine whether he should be held in contempt for the actions of his
[01:02:23.340 --> 01:02:27.820]  lawyer. If you recall, David's undercover videos made national headlines two years ago
[01:02:27.820 --> 01:02:32.380]  when he and others posed as representatives from a biomedical firm recording conversations
[01:02:32.380 --> 01:02:37.180]  with high level officials at Planned Parenthood. This resulted in California's Attorney General
[01:02:37.180 --> 01:02:42.660]  Xavier Becetta earlier this year charging Daliden and partners with 15 felony counts
[01:02:42.660 --> 01:02:47.860]  of violating the privacy of health care providers by recording confidential information without
[01:02:47.860 --> 01:03:17.700]  their consent. This was book ready with your lowdown for May 26th, 2017.
[01:03:17.700 --> 01:03:25.140]  We are back. Great to help you with our video. Okay, if you can get someone to get plates
[01:03:25.140 --> 01:03:31.100]  on your vehicle then you're not likely to get stopped as often. But if you do, you're
[01:03:31.100 --> 01:03:38.740]  in Arizona so it may be a little different. You need to look at the code in Arizona. Transportation
[01:03:38.740 --> 01:03:47.500]  code is a professional code. It's for commercial drivers and in most every state that I've
[01:03:47.500 --> 01:03:55.620]  looked at so far, the transportation code is a code of limited enforcement. Not just
[01:03:55.620 --> 01:04:01.580]  everybody can enforce it. We have Olivier in Tennessee. He's likely to be calling in
[01:04:01.580 --> 01:04:09.180]  tonight. He researched in Tennessee and local police simply cannot pull you over for a traffic
[01:04:09.180 --> 01:04:16.940]  infraction. Only the State Highway Patrol can do that and this is relatively consistent.
[01:04:16.940 --> 01:04:26.060]  The same in Texas. Now, there can be certain police officers certified to enforce the transportation
[01:04:26.060 --> 01:04:31.660]  code and only they can pull you over and there can only be one municipal police officer in
[01:04:31.660 --> 01:04:38.940]  a municipality. If the municipality meets certain other requirements and so far none
[01:04:38.940 --> 01:04:52.100]  of them do. So, Barrett, read the administrative code in Arizona that creates the Highway Patrol
[01:04:52.100 --> 01:04:58.940]  and that sets up enforcement of the transportation code because this is where we found the best
[01:04:58.940 --> 01:05:07.860]  stuff in Texas. We found, Texas, you've got way too much background noises. You've got
[01:05:07.860 --> 01:05:15.500]  something banging in there. I'm going to have to mute you. So, you look at the administrative
[01:05:15.500 --> 01:05:23.420]  code. The administrative codes generally tell who can do what and set things up. Look for
[01:05:23.420 --> 01:05:44.100]  anything concerning enforcement of transportation code. That's right. Okay. No, no, no. Hold
[01:05:44.100 --> 01:05:53.260]  on, hold on, don't. You're generalizing. In Texas, that's the case. Not necessarily in
[01:05:53.260 --> 01:06:03.540]  Arizona because I haven't looked at Arizona traffic code. This is the most I've seen,
[01:06:03.540 --> 01:06:09.540]  but if you assume that it's that way without checking and reading the code, you can have
[01:06:09.540 --> 01:06:17.220]  a serious problem. However, it doesn't take as much reading as you would think. Just do
[01:06:17.220 --> 01:06:27.460]  a search for authority to enforce transportation code, Arizona. And you should find most of
[01:06:27.460 --> 01:06:38.460]  the laws relating to that. But otherwise, I don't know what the codes are. In Texas,
[01:06:38.460 --> 01:06:44.580]  if a municipal police officer pulls me over, which this guy did, I'm going to charge him
[01:06:44.580 --> 01:06:54.100]  with first degree felony aggravated assault in a counter claim to his claim. He went to
[01:06:54.100 --> 01:07:00.660]  the municipal court judge and told the municipal court that I have reason to believe or do
[01:07:00.660 --> 01:07:07.820]  believe and do believe that Randall Calton violated this law. Well, I'm going to go to
[01:07:07.820 --> 01:07:13.020]  the municipal judge and say, I have reason to believe and do believe that this police
[01:07:13.020 --> 01:07:22.300]  officer violated this law. Now, what do we do? The magistrate enforces the law when the
[01:07:22.300 --> 01:07:28.380]  policeman brings it, but not when the master of the policeman brings it. Let's see how
[01:07:28.380 --> 01:07:36.540]  that works out for you, Beva. When he refuses to act on my counter complaint, and then I
[01:07:36.540 --> 01:07:44.540]  go after the magistrate, the municipal judge, and I file criminal charges against him with
[01:07:44.540 --> 01:07:53.980]  the county judge. We start working the routine on him. But the police officer, when you file
[01:07:53.980 --> 01:08:03.820]  a criminal complaint against him for enforcing the traffic law, and then you go find out
[01:08:03.820 --> 01:08:18.060]  what the commission is that certifies peace officers in Arizona. In Texas, it's Texas
[01:08:18.060 --> 01:08:25.620]  Council on Law Enforcement. T-Close, they call it. They're the licensing agency. You
[01:08:25.620 --> 01:08:29.780]  file a complaint with the licensing agency. It's like filing a bar grievance or a judicial
[01:08:29.780 --> 01:08:38.180]  conduct complaint. So the chief of police sends the cop out there and says, go write
[01:08:38.180 --> 01:08:44.180]  these tickets. He goes and writes these tickets just the way he's supposed to. Bam, he gets
[01:08:44.180 --> 01:08:50.460]  a professional conduct complaint. He gets half a dozen pressure, pressure, conduct complaints.
[01:08:50.460 --> 01:08:56.780]  His bond rating will go up so high, he can't be insured. He can't work as a police officer
[01:08:56.780 --> 01:09:04.540]  because nobody will hire him. And the jurisdiction will have to fire him or their whole insurance
[01:09:04.540 --> 01:09:12.100]  policy increases. And the officer's going to know that. So the boss sends him out to
[01:09:12.100 --> 01:09:16.260]  write this ticket. He goes out and writes the ticket and all of a sudden the sky's falling
[01:09:16.260 --> 01:09:22.940]  in on him. Now he has plausible deniability to go back to the chief of police and say,
[01:09:22.940 --> 01:09:30.140]  what in the heck is going on? I'm going to lose my certification because of this. The
[01:09:30.140 --> 01:09:33.300]  chief is going to send me back out to write more tickets and he's going to tell him you
[01:09:33.300 --> 01:09:38.420]  are going to write those tickets. I ain't writing them because I'm not losing my certification.
[01:09:38.420 --> 01:09:42.540]  And all the other officers in the department will find out about it and they're going to
[01:09:42.540 --> 01:09:48.220]  have a hard time getting police to write tickets. And certainly they'll get them to where they
[01:09:48.220 --> 01:09:55.820]  don't ever want to stop you again. Now, since you don't have a license, and what I was going
[01:09:55.820 --> 01:10:06.300]  to say about the fact that I do, I have a license and I have license plates on my vehicle.
[01:10:06.300 --> 01:10:15.340]  But that don't mean I'm using it in commerce. I can if I want to. And if the policeman sees
[01:10:15.340 --> 01:10:23.060]  it and he's authorized to enforce it, well, he can pull me over. But the first thing he
[01:10:23.060 --> 01:10:30.740]  has to do, the reason he can pull me over is because I have a commercial license displayed
[01:10:30.740 --> 01:10:36.420]  on my vehicle. And that would give a reasonable person that ordinary prudence caused to believe
[01:10:36.420 --> 01:10:43.060]  that I could be operated in commerce. And he can pull me over based on that. But then
[01:10:43.060 --> 01:10:50.500]  once he pulls me over, now he has to ascertain whether or not I actually am operating in
[01:10:50.500 --> 01:10:58.460]  commerce. If he doesn't see passengers in my vehicle or he doesn't see goods or commodities
[01:10:58.460 --> 01:11:06.340]  that I'm transporting, then he has no evidence that I'm in commerce. If he sees passengers
[01:11:06.340 --> 01:11:12.620]  in my vehicle, he has to ask them, are you being transported for hire? If they say no,
[01:11:12.620 --> 01:11:22.500]  he has no probable cause. They never ever do that. So while he may be able to pull me
[01:11:22.500 --> 01:11:31.300]  over by virtue of the existence of the plates, if he's authorized to enforce the transportation
[01:11:31.300 --> 01:11:37.500]  code, so when a DPS officer pulls me over, he's authorized to enforce the transportation
[01:11:37.500 --> 01:11:43.820]  code. But when he doesn't ask questions that go to commerce, then I file criminal charges
[01:11:43.820 --> 01:11:51.860]  against him and a professional conduct complaint against him. Say, let's dance, guy. But I
[01:11:51.860 --> 01:12:04.860]  do not argue with him on the side of the road. I do not give fair warning. Never ever tell
[01:12:04.860 --> 01:12:12.020]  the officer what your rights are. Never tell the officer what the law is and what he's
[01:12:12.020 --> 01:12:21.140]  supposed to do. They will always interpret that as a threat. Pushback him when you get
[01:12:21.140 --> 01:12:30.220]  to court. Let it come as a nice pleasant surprise. Now this officer was really congenial and
[01:12:30.220 --> 01:12:34.220]  that I think the police are trying to get along with this better because they've been
[01:12:34.220 --> 01:12:43.140]  in such a bad light lately. So I gave him some fair warning. I told him, I am going
[01:12:43.140 --> 01:12:50.700]  to give you a walk through the legal system you are not going to believe. He said, oh,
[01:12:50.700 --> 01:12:56.300]  you are. Yes, I am. Now, don't take anything I do personal. It's not personal. I'm just
[01:12:56.300 --> 01:13:03.620]  doing it for yucks. But see, he has no advance warning of what I'm going to do. He's going
[01:13:03.620 --> 01:13:07.740]  to get first degree felony aggravated assault charges against him. And the reason I filed
[01:13:07.740 --> 01:13:13.500]  a first degree felony is I don't really want him indicted. I just wanted to have to look
[01:13:13.500 --> 01:13:17.900]  at the prospect. Does all that make sense, Barry?
[01:13:17.900 --> 01:13:29.300]  Yeah, yeah. So I need to find out if indeed there's a, who has the right to enforce traffic
[01:13:29.300 --> 01:13:35.220]  laws out here. And hopefully it's going to be just for you as state patrol because usually
[01:13:35.220 --> 01:13:41.900]  they don't pull you over. Yeah, but what do we do? Don't ask the police or the prosecutors.
[01:13:41.900 --> 01:13:47.340]  They will lie to you. Oh, yeah, I already know that. But yeah, people
[01:13:47.340 --> 01:13:55.700]  don't know that. So if I have plates, I'm not admitting some kind of guilt or anything
[01:13:55.700 --> 01:14:04.300]  or absolutely not. Good, good. Because I want, I want, oh, I found out what I called my insurance
[01:14:04.300 --> 01:14:11.420]  company. I says, Hey, this is my history. You know, I just let my license expire and
[01:14:11.420 --> 01:14:15.700]  all that. I kind of lied to him a little bit because my, I'm suspended for a B UI like
[01:14:15.700 --> 01:14:20.260]  10 years ago. So, but really, I kind of just said, Hey, I just let it expire. You know,
[01:14:20.260 --> 01:14:27.540]  I gave him my license number and all that. But I'm basically wanting to get insurance
[01:14:27.540 --> 01:14:32.420]  on this case. Somebody rear ends me again. It's been the second time I've had two bikes
[01:14:32.420 --> 01:14:37.060]  totaled in the last 10 years because of sitting out of light and just minding my own business
[01:14:37.060 --> 01:14:43.780]  and wow. But so that's kind of what I'm worried about. I don't want them taking my bike and
[01:14:43.780 --> 01:14:48.020]  I'm thinking, Hey, they find out I don't have a license. I tell them, Hey, I'm not engaged
[01:14:48.020 --> 01:14:52.780]  in personal activity and you have to have a warrant to, I don't need to see your warrant
[01:14:52.780 --> 01:14:59.620]  for taking my property and taking my, my person, my, my person as well. And don't they have
[01:14:59.620 --> 01:15:05.180]  to have a warrant signed by a judge for both items, my bike and so on?
[01:15:05.180 --> 01:15:14.340]  No, they don't. If in most every state a policeman can arrest for an on-site offense
[01:15:14.340 --> 01:15:22.420]  or an alleged on-site offense. And if the officer arrests you for an on-site offense,
[01:15:22.420 --> 01:15:30.700]  he's responsible for your equipment. So he has to have it towed and stored safely so
[01:15:30.700 --> 01:15:40.740]  when you get out of jail, you can get it back. So he can, he can arrest you and he can tow.
[01:15:40.740 --> 01:15:45.620]  A lot of times people don't have the money and the tow company is just so greedy to just
[01:15:45.620 --> 01:15:49.860]  love it. They just get all this free money. And then nowadays they're just telling you
[01:15:49.860 --> 01:15:54.980]  to give the car hand your cops the keys so they don't have to hassle with selling your
[01:15:54.980 --> 01:15:59.780]  car without keys and having to go make it a set. But they're just really making it good
[01:15:59.780 --> 01:16:05.220]  on these tow police people to get you for these people.
[01:16:05.220 --> 01:16:11.620]  We need to do our homework and start taking them on. That's what I'm doing with this electronic
[01:16:11.620 --> 01:16:12.620]  lawyer.
[01:16:12.620 --> 01:16:19.260]  I'm going to get about 50 grand and I want to buy your Eddie Craig's classic, this whole
[01:16:19.260 --> 01:16:27.460]  traffic thing and I want to get the Brock's Law dictionary and the program that you have.
[01:16:27.460 --> 01:16:31.700]  How much is all that going to cost? Because I'm going to get about 50 grand for this.
[01:16:31.700 --> 01:16:38.700]  Well, that'll cost about, we'll get about 600 bucks all total.
[01:16:38.700 --> 01:16:39.700]  Okay.
[01:16:39.700 --> 01:16:44.700]  I think Dr, hang on, because I don't have a radio.
[01:16:44.700 --> 01:16:45.700]  Oh, okay.
[01:16:45.700 --> 01:16:49.980]  Okay, hang on. We're about to go to break. Randy Kelton, we have a radio. I called in
[01:16:49.980 --> 01:17:00.100]  number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:17:00.100 --> 01:17:04.740]  I love logos. Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. I'm
[01:17:04.740 --> 01:17:08.740]  so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. I need my truth pick. I'd be
[01:17:08.740 --> 01:17:13.620]  lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. I'd love to
[01:17:13.620 --> 01:17:17.460]  volunteer as a show producer, but I'm a bit of a Luddite and I really don't have any money
[01:17:17.460 --> 01:17:21.780]  to give because I spent it all on supplements. How can I help logos?
[01:17:21.780 --> 01:17:26.820]  Well, I'm glad you asked. Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos.
[01:17:26.820 --> 01:17:31.300]  We're ordering your supplies or holiday gifts. First thing you do is clear your cookies.
[01:17:31.300 --> 01:17:38.060]  Now, go to LogosRadioNetwork.com. Click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. Now, when
[01:17:38.060 --> 01:17:43.340]  you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and Logos gets a few pesos.
[01:17:43.340 --> 01:17:44.340]  Do I pay extra?
[01:17:44.340 --> 01:17:45.340]  No.
[01:17:45.340 --> 01:17:46.820]  Do you have to do anything different when I order?
[01:17:46.820 --> 01:17:47.820]  No.
[01:17:47.820 --> 01:17:48.820]  Can I use my Amazon pride?
[01:17:48.820 --> 01:17:49.820]  No.
[01:17:49.820 --> 01:17:50.820]  I mean, yes.
[01:17:50.820 --> 01:17:56.620]  Wow. Giving without doing anything or spending any money. This is perfect. Thank you so much.
[01:17:56.620 --> 01:17:57.620]  We are welcome.
[01:17:57.620 --> 01:17:58.620]  Happy holidays, Logos.
[01:17:58.620 --> 01:18:05.620]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:18:05.620 --> 01:18:10.060]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris Proven Method. Michael Mearris has
[01:18:10.060 --> 01:18:14.980]  won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. You'll
[01:18:14.980 --> 01:18:19.820]  get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil
[01:18:19.820 --> 01:18:25.220]  rights statutes. What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons? How to answer
[01:18:25.220 --> 01:18:29.860]  letters and phone calls? How to get debt collectors out of your credit report? How to turn the
[01:18:29.860 --> 01:18:35.140]  financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away? The Michael Mearris Proven
[01:18:35.140 --> 01:18:40.540]  Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available
[01:18:40.540 --> 01:18:45.900]  as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael
[01:18:45.900 --> 01:18:56.220]  Mearris banner or email michaelmearris at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[01:18:56.220 --> 01:19:00.500]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:19:00.500 --> 01:19:30.380]  Okay, we are back. Randy Chelten, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Barrett.
[01:19:30.380 --> 01:19:43.860]  Barrett, read the code. That's the best thing I can tell you. Read the code and then call
[01:19:43.860 --> 01:19:48.580]  us back next week and let us know how it goes. I do need to move on. I've got a bunch of
[01:19:48.580 --> 01:20:00.900]  callers. Okay, thank you Barrett. Okay, now we're going to go to Wendy in Colorado. Hello.
[01:20:00.900 --> 01:20:09.220]  Okay, my caller board is jumping around. Hello, Wendy. Hello. Hello, and I apologize for
[01:20:09.220 --> 01:20:15.540]  not getting back to you on your emails, but this last week I've been really buried building
[01:20:15.540 --> 01:20:21.180]  this electronic lawyer. So next week I should have a little more time and I'll be able to
[01:20:21.180 --> 01:20:28.860]  get caught up. Okay. What's the situation with you now?
[01:20:28.860 --> 01:20:37.660]  Well, I went to court yesterday and they wanted me to sign a paper saying I'd be their cleaner
[01:20:37.660 --> 01:20:42.860]  and I wouldn't sign it. They sent me into the judge and the judge says, what's the deal?
[01:20:42.860 --> 01:20:46.780]  What's going on with you? Why you don't want to sign my paper? And I said, because I'd
[01:20:46.780 --> 01:20:55.500]  rather have it a training present if I sign anything. And I said, I'm here on a special
[01:20:55.500 --> 01:21:03.940]  appearance and he says, appearance for whom? And I said myself under no proper jurisdiction.
[01:21:03.940 --> 01:21:06.780]  And I tried to file that with the courts, but the guy didn't know what I was talking
[01:21:06.780 --> 01:21:11.380]  about the court clerk and he said, you'll have to talk to the judge. So I did that.
[01:21:11.380 --> 01:21:18.340]  And then he said, well, okay, then I'm just going to read the rights to you. He's read
[01:21:18.340 --> 01:21:24.500]  me all my rights on that paper. And I objected to that just because I heard I was supposed
[01:21:24.500 --> 01:21:29.460]  to object to things. And then he said, I'm going to set you a court date for July 11th
[01:21:29.460 --> 01:21:34.260]  and if you don't show up there and I just want to let you know that I will file a warrant
[01:21:34.260 --> 01:21:37.980]  for you even if you think this court doesn't have jurisdiction. And I said, thank you,
[01:21:37.980 --> 01:21:43.100]  Your Honor. No, thank you, sir. Have a nice day. So that's how that happened.
[01:21:43.100 --> 01:21:52.220]  Okay. You have to, in order to protect your rights, you have to file a written motion,
[01:21:52.220 --> 01:22:01.140]  a written special appearance. And you need to state reasons why they don't have jurisdiction.
[01:22:01.140 --> 01:22:06.500]  Just saying they don't have jurisdiction is insufficient. It sounds like this judge didn't
[01:22:06.500 --> 01:22:11.020]  get carried away and he didn't have too bad an attitude. So that was kind of a good thing.
[01:22:11.020 --> 01:22:17.940]  He was a good thing. He was really nice actually. But he was a magistrate.
[01:22:17.940 --> 01:22:22.580]  Well now that is good to hear. Okay. Was the arresting officer there?
[01:22:22.580 --> 01:22:27.900]  No, thank you. No, this was just my life then. Good.
[01:22:27.900 --> 01:22:32.500]  Wait a minute. I'm having trouble hearing you. Can you move the mic a little bit away
[01:22:32.500 --> 01:22:40.060]  from your mouth? Sure. Is that better? That's better. Now, what did you say about the judge?
[01:22:40.060 --> 01:22:52.900]  He said it was an alignment. Okay. We need to look at Colorado Code. This is what,
[01:22:52.900 --> 01:23:05.420]  okay. What are you charged with? Is it a class C? Driving in a reputation. There is no probation
[01:23:05.420 --> 01:23:10.260]  or anything. It's jail time. No. Okay. So it's not a class C misdemeanor.
[01:23:10.260 --> 01:23:16.580]  Okay. Then I was going to say what the code read in Texas. And in Texas, you can only
[01:23:16.580 --> 01:23:25.420]  have an arraignment if there is a crime punishable by imprisonment. But this one is so you can't
[01:23:25.420 --> 01:23:30.260]  have an arraignment. I'm going to suggest to you that the last thing they want is to
[01:23:30.260 --> 01:23:40.260]  put you in jail. Cost them $30,000 a year. They don't make any money putting you in jail.
[01:23:40.260 --> 01:23:45.180]  What they want to do is put you on probation and make you pay probation fees. The reason
[01:23:45.180 --> 01:23:51.260]  they want to do that is because if they fine you, then a portion of the fine goes to the
[01:23:51.260 --> 01:23:59.940]  state to the general fund, generally 60%. But probation fees stay in the county. So what
[01:23:59.940 --> 01:24:06.180]  they want to do is put you on probation, make you do community service. The community service
[01:24:06.180 --> 01:24:10.180]  is just song and dance and cells are down your pants. What they really want is to collect
[01:24:10.180 --> 01:24:17.180]  the probation fees every month. So it's very unlikely they're going to want you to go to
[01:24:17.180 --> 01:24:19.180]  jail. Why don't you...
[01:24:19.180 --> 01:24:23.780]  I can't read them on the revolutions, but I'm wondering if I can read them on the way
[01:24:23.780 --> 01:24:28.420]  they... I don't even jump in when they pulled me over, you know?
[01:24:28.420 --> 01:24:40.100]  It doesn't matter if he saw you driving. When you weren't driving, did he see you pull
[01:24:40.100 --> 01:24:44.300]  over and get out of the vehicle?
[01:24:44.300 --> 01:24:47.940]  The reason he stopped me is because he said somebody that looks like me that drove a truck
[01:24:47.940 --> 01:24:52.780]  like me, somebody called in and said maybe I was having a seizure, or said was I driving
[01:24:52.780 --> 01:24:59.580]  drunken. He goes, was you up on 120? About two miles away, and I said, oh, okay. So you
[01:24:59.580 --> 01:25:03.940]  were already parked and out of the vehicle when he showed up?
[01:25:03.940 --> 01:25:10.380]  Right. He saw me in the vehicle with my dog, but I was pulling up my yard.
[01:25:10.380 --> 01:25:14.860]  Okay. He cannot arrest you without a warrant, period.
[01:25:14.860 --> 01:25:17.700]  And then what happened is he goes, I'm not going to give you a ticket. I'm just going
[01:25:17.700 --> 01:25:21.620]  to give you a warrant, but I just wanted to see if you were okay. But this was like two
[01:25:21.620 --> 01:25:25.820]  miles away, and he goes, have you been up there? And I said, no. So then he goes, well, can
[01:25:25.820 --> 01:25:30.660]  I see your driver's license? I said, I don't have one. I'm just giving my... I just...
[01:25:30.660 --> 01:25:34.540]  My dog is blind and I've got diabetes. I jumped in the truck to find him in my two labs.
[01:25:34.540 --> 01:25:37.660]  So I just went around the corner. Maybe he was telling me I was lying.
[01:25:37.660 --> 01:25:43.020]  Okay. Here's what Eddie Craig says about talking to the police.
[01:25:43.020 --> 01:25:44.020]  I know that.
[01:25:44.020 --> 01:25:45.020]  Shut... Pardon me?
[01:25:45.020 --> 01:25:46.020]  He says shut up and shut up.
[01:25:46.020 --> 01:25:51.540]  He says shut up, shut up, shut up, and keep shutin' up.
[01:25:51.540 --> 01:25:52.540]  Right.
[01:25:52.540 --> 01:25:53.540]  You...
[01:25:53.540 --> 01:25:54.540]  Okay.
[01:25:54.540 --> 01:26:00.540]  You're a fictionary, but this happens like two days. I don't know why I found your site.
[01:26:00.540 --> 01:26:05.140]  But, um, then I found your site. So it was...
[01:26:05.140 --> 01:26:09.140]  Okay. Okay. You need to move the mic a little further from your mouth. I think the mic is
[01:26:09.140 --> 01:26:10.140]  overloaded.
[01:26:10.140 --> 01:26:11.140]  Is that better?
[01:26:11.140 --> 01:26:12.140]  That's better.
[01:26:12.140 --> 01:26:13.140]  Is that better?
[01:26:13.140 --> 01:26:14.140]  Okay.
[01:26:14.140 --> 01:26:15.140]  Sorry.
[01:26:15.140 --> 01:26:20.460]  Okay. Yeah, that's better. Here's the deal. The officer did personally see or hear the
[01:26:20.460 --> 01:26:23.540]  offense being committed. In order to arrest...
[01:26:23.540 --> 01:26:24.540]  See me.
[01:26:24.540 --> 01:26:31.740]  Please. You can't talk when I'm talking because we have suppressors, and it'll push your voice
[01:26:31.740 --> 01:26:33.540]  down below mine.
[01:26:33.540 --> 01:26:34.540]  Okay.
[01:26:34.540 --> 01:26:43.820]  Doesn't matter what he knew. In order to arrest without a warrant, it must be an on-site offense.
[01:26:43.820 --> 01:26:51.740]  He must personally see or hear the offense being committed, or a magistrate or a judge
[01:26:51.740 --> 01:26:58.380]  must have ordered your arrest for an offense the magistrate or judge actually saw or heard
[01:26:58.380 --> 01:26:59.380]  committed.
[01:26:59.380 --> 01:27:00.380]  That's...
[01:27:00.380 --> 01:27:01.380]  Okay.
[01:27:01.380 --> 01:27:09.940] ...priming. So, he didn't see the offense committed. He had no power to arrest. Now, go back and
[01:27:09.940 --> 01:27:14.020]  look up false arrest in Colorado.
[01:27:14.020 --> 01:27:15.020]  Rest me.
[01:27:15.020 --> 01:27:18.740]  Wait a minute. Say what?
[01:27:18.740 --> 01:27:22.500]  He didn't arrest me.
[01:27:22.500 --> 01:27:25.340]  I'm just getting half of what you're saying.
[01:27:25.340 --> 01:27:36.420]  I'll say it. Just a second. Just one second. I've got to fix my phone here.
[01:27:36.420 --> 01:27:37.420]  Oh, okay.
[01:27:37.420 --> 01:27:48.220]  Just a minute, sir. Just one second. Oh, okay. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Just one second.
[01:27:48.220 --> 01:27:53.220]  Okay. Here we go now.
[01:27:53.220 --> 01:27:54.220]  Okay.
[01:27:54.220 --> 01:27:55.220]  Hello?
[01:27:55.220 --> 01:27:59.980]  So, I can hear you. Did you say he did not arrest you?
[01:27:59.980 --> 01:28:06.980]  No. He said he was going to arrest me, and they said, if I'm going to call right now and
[01:28:06.980 --> 01:28:07.980]  see if...
[01:28:07.980 --> 01:28:13.980]  No, no. Don't go through the whole story again. At the end of the day, did he arrest you?
[01:28:13.980 --> 01:28:14.980]  No.
[01:28:14.980 --> 01:28:25.700]  Okay. So, he went back and wrote out a citation and got a warrant.
[01:28:25.700 --> 01:28:30.060]  How did you wind up in court if he didn't arrest you? Did he write you a citation?
[01:28:30.060 --> 01:28:31.060]  What did you do?
[01:28:31.060 --> 01:28:35.300]  Uh-huh. Well, we had a training with him, and there was four cops showed up, and then
[01:28:35.300 --> 01:28:36.300]  he had to...
[01:28:36.300 --> 01:28:42.460]  I don't care about... Don't go off into all those details, Will. How did he get you to
[01:28:42.460 --> 01:28:45.020]  court?
[01:28:45.020 --> 01:28:49.060]  He wrote me a driving under violation, revocation.
[01:28:49.060 --> 01:28:50.060]  Okay.
[01:28:50.060 --> 01:28:51.060]  A ticket.
[01:28:51.060 --> 01:28:58.060]  Okay. He wrote a ticket. He didn't personally see or hear the offense being committed.
[01:28:58.060 --> 01:28:59.060]  No.
[01:28:59.060 --> 01:29:08.140]  So, he released you or he arrested you, then he released you on your own recognizance.
[01:29:08.140 --> 01:29:09.140]  That's how that works.
[01:29:09.140 --> 01:29:10.140]  Peace.
[01:29:10.140 --> 01:29:11.140]  Okay.
[01:29:11.140 --> 01:29:17.820]  And he says, here's the procedure. If he didn't see you commit the offense, and he comes
[01:29:17.820 --> 01:29:22.420]  and talks to you and you tell him something that gives him reason to believe that you
[01:29:22.420 --> 01:29:31.180]  committed the offense, he can't arrest you. He has to go to a magistrate and make a complaint
[01:29:31.180 --> 01:29:35.980]  to the magistrate, and the magistrate will issue a warrant, then he can come back out
[01:29:35.980 --> 01:29:38.020]  with a warrant and arrest you.
[01:29:38.020 --> 01:29:39.020]  Okay.
[01:29:39.020 --> 01:29:44.580]  He didn't bother... He didn't bother that part, so he has a problem. Now you have something
[01:29:44.580 --> 01:29:54.380]  to work with. You file false arrest against the officer. Now, in Texas, we don't have
[01:29:54.380 --> 01:30:06.820]  a false arrest statute. The statute is kidnapped.
[01:30:06.820 --> 01:30:10.900]  Are you stressed? In our fast-paced world, many of us are, but there's something better
[01:30:10.900 --> 01:30:15.900]  than alcohol or big pharma pills, and it could add years to your life. I'm Dr. Catherine
[01:30:15.900 --> 01:30:19.100]  Albrecht, and I'll be back with more Injust a Moment.
[01:30:19.100 --> 01:30:23.460]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back
[01:30:23.460 --> 01:30:29.060]  again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:29.060 --> 01:30:35.220]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy,
[01:30:35.220 --> 01:30:40.340]  it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:40.340 --> 01:30:47.940]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:47.940 --> 01:30:53.220]  How much is that doggy in the window? Arf, arf! If you're stressed, it's a question you
[01:30:53.220 --> 01:30:57.820]  might want to ask. Researchers say companion animals like dogs lower the stress hormone
[01:30:57.820 --> 01:31:03.140]  cortisol, and lower stress can lead to a longer, happier life. Pet owners also have significantly
[01:31:03.140 --> 01:31:07.740]  lower blood pressure, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. This can be particularly important
[01:31:07.740 --> 01:31:11.980]  for patients recovering from heart attacks. In fact, studies show that pet owners have
[01:31:11.980 --> 01:31:16.460]  a much higher one-year heart attack survival rate than those without pets. Dogs may be
[01:31:16.460 --> 01:31:20.340]  man's best friend, but they're not the only animals with health benefits. Cats, birds,
[01:31:20.340 --> 01:31:25.460]  and even fish can work miracles. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information
[01:31:25.460 --> 01:31:30.580]  at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.580 --> 01:31:35.940]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:35.940 --> 01:31:40.660]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have
[01:31:40.660 --> 01:31:44.940]  concluded it was a controlled demolition. Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have
[01:31:44.940 --> 01:31:49.500]  given their lives, and thousands of my fellow force responders are dying. I'm not a conspiracy
[01:31:49.500 --> 01:31:52.500]  theorist. I'm a structural engineer. I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an
[01:31:52.500 --> 01:31:57.100]  Air Force pilot. I'm a father who lost his son. We are Americans, and we deserve the
[01:31:57.100 --> 01:32:02.380]  privilege to go to RememberBuilding7.org today. Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home
[01:32:02.380 --> 01:32:06.100]  Improvements. Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? Come
[01:32:06.100 --> 01:32:09.740]  on, we all know the government caused it with their chem trails, but good luck getting
[01:32:09.740 --> 01:32:13.620]  them to pay for it. Okay, I might be kidding about the chem trails, but I'm serious about
[01:32:13.620 --> 01:32:17.500]  your roof. That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle
[01:32:17.500 --> 01:32:22.940]  the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year
[01:32:22.940 --> 01:32:27.540]  A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints. You can trust Hill Country
[01:32:27.540 --> 01:32:32.260]  Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. Just call
[01:32:32.260 --> 01:32:40.660]  512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and
[01:32:40.660 --> 01:32:45.260]  we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:45.260 --> 01:32:52.260]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locked in. That's 512-992-8745.
[01:32:52.260 --> 01:32:58.700]  Or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. Discounts are based on full roof replacement. I may
[01:32:58.700 --> 01:33:27.420]  not actually be kidding about chem trails. Okay, we are back, and we're talking to Wendy
[01:33:27.420 --> 01:33:37.620]  in Colorado. So Wendy, look up false imprisonment. So what you need to do here is give them reason
[01:33:37.620 --> 01:33:46.460]  to want your case to go away. Now, with that said, you're unlikely to get the whole thing
[01:33:46.460 --> 01:33:55.020]  to go away. What you're likely to be able to do is make a deal. But you got to have
[01:33:55.020 --> 01:34:02.940]  something to bargain with. Okay. A professional conduct complaint against the police officer
[01:34:02.940 --> 01:34:08.220]  for doing a false arrest because he didn't see or hear the offense being committed. A
[01:34:08.220 --> 01:34:17.460]  tort letter to the... Is he a city cop or county? I believe he's a city cop. There was
[01:34:17.460 --> 01:34:21.260]  four of them there. The cop that pulled me over, he didn't write the ticket. He had this
[01:34:21.260 --> 01:34:31.260]  other guy write the ticket and he left. Whoa. So the other guy didn't know anything. Oh,
[01:34:31.260 --> 01:34:38.620]  wonderful. So you go after this, the guy who actually wrote the ticket. Oh, that's going
[01:34:38.620 --> 01:34:48.780]  to be great fun. So you file criminally against him. Okay. You need to look in the penal code.
[01:34:48.780 --> 01:34:58.460]  Begin a section on official misconduct. Look for official misconduct. There is a section
[01:34:58.460 --> 01:35:05.920]  in your criminal code of crimes that only public officials can commit. And if I remember
[01:35:05.920 --> 01:35:13.460]  right in Colorado, you will find it under official misconduct. It's a class A misdemeanor
[01:35:13.460 --> 01:35:21.220]  in Colorado. If an officer exerts a proportion to exert an authority he doesn't have and
[01:35:21.220 --> 01:35:27.700]  in the process to... It's one for access to enjoyment or right. That's a class A misdemeanor.
[01:35:27.700 --> 01:35:37.420]  So file a counterclaim in this case. I have your email. I'll send you the counterclaim
[01:35:37.420 --> 01:35:44.580]  that I file here against police officers. Now this will not be appropriate in Colorado
[01:35:44.580 --> 01:35:54.140]  because it's under Texas law but it shows you how I do it. Okay. I do it as a counterclaim
[01:35:54.140 --> 01:36:01.220]  and I say this officer filed this claim against me, a criminal complaint with the magistrate.
[01:36:01.220 --> 01:36:07.700]  Well I'm filing one against him, a criminal complaint against the magistrate, with the
[01:36:07.700 --> 01:36:13.020]  magistrate. So the magistrate took his complaint and prosecuted me and I'm saying that when
[01:36:13.020 --> 01:36:22.220]  he wrote the complaint he violated law so I want the judge to prosecute him or the judge
[01:36:22.220 --> 01:36:28.500]  is not going to want to prosecute him. And when the judge refuses to then you file criminal
[01:36:28.500 --> 01:36:33.860]  charges against the judge and just generally make their lives miserable and then go to
[01:36:33.860 --> 01:36:39.660]  the prosecutor and say look make me a deal I can live with and we'll make all this go
[01:36:39.660 --> 01:36:45.820]  away. Otherwise I'm going to take these guys to a grand jury and we'll keep working this
[01:36:45.820 --> 01:36:50.540]  up to the system till we get to the Supreme Court and I'll file criminal charges against
[01:36:50.540 --> 01:37:02.500]  them and then we'll all go to the feds. Okay. So it's all about poker here. Yeah. I have
[01:37:02.500 --> 01:37:09.060]  some papers that I want actually some of the Colorado law that I thought you might be interested
[01:37:09.060 --> 01:37:13.460]  you know in because if you have an address I could send it to you. I got it directly
[01:37:13.460 --> 01:37:17.860]  on the Colorado Statutes. It is the statute. Oh no, no you don't need to send me this.
[01:37:17.860 --> 01:37:22.060]  Just send me what the numbers of the statutes are. I can look them up a whole lot easier.
[01:37:22.060 --> 01:37:31.260]  Okay. Okay. And I wanted to mention that. We'll talk during the week. I'm kind of getting
[01:37:31.260 --> 01:37:37.140]  caught up with getting this tool together and I'll do some quick research. I know where
[01:37:37.140 --> 01:37:46.260]  to look. I can find these. So send me a new email. Excuse me. Send me a new email so it's
[01:37:46.260 --> 01:37:52.060]  at the top. I get about a hundred a day so they get buried real fast. I'm sure. I'll
[01:37:52.060 --> 01:37:59.460]  do a quick look in Colorado law. Okay. All right. Thank you. You've got a good claim
[01:37:59.460 --> 01:38:06.540]  against it. Okay. Thank you, Wendy. Okay. Now we're going to John in Pennsylvania. Hello
[01:38:06.540 --> 01:38:16.580]  John. Howdy Randy. How are you tonight? Wow. You're in Pennsylvania and you speak Redneck.
[01:38:16.580 --> 01:38:22.940]  Yeah. Well, you're from the UK. Of course. You're multilingual. Yeah. Well, what's the
[01:38:22.940 --> 01:38:28.020]  school in West Virginia? I learned a little bit of it down there. Oh no, they speak Hillbilly
[01:38:28.020 --> 01:38:36.060]  in West Virginia. I'm from Tennessee so I'm multilingual. I speak Hillbilly from Tennessee.
[01:38:36.060 --> 01:38:43.460]  I grew up in Chicago so I speak Yankee. I'm living in Texas so now I speak Redneck. I
[01:38:43.460 --> 01:38:52.740]  speak all of them fluently and I speak legalese. Okay. What do you have for us today? Well,
[01:38:52.740 --> 01:38:59.780]  I've got something interesting. I have a case where the judge recoups themselves and it
[01:38:59.780 --> 01:39:07.980]  took four months but we got a new judge. Now this new judge put in an order claiming that
[01:39:07.980 --> 01:39:14.780]  he was appointed by the Supreme Court and the administrative office of courts but there
[01:39:14.780 --> 01:39:21.500]  was nothing in the docket or in the case file or the first judge actually recoups themselves
[01:39:21.500 --> 01:39:29.140]  or how this second judge actually got there. So I sent out two foyers and they both came
[01:39:29.140 --> 01:39:35.180]  back with we have no records. So if he's claiming he was appointed by the Supreme Court and
[01:39:35.180 --> 01:39:42.500]  the Supreme Court knows nothing about him. He's impersonating a public official. That's
[01:39:42.500 --> 01:39:53.060]  what I believe. That's a crime in every state. Most of them it's a felony. I believe it is
[01:39:53.060 --> 01:40:04.020]  in Pennsylvania. That'll be so much fun. Generally when a judge recuses himself they will appoint
[01:40:04.020 --> 01:40:14.660]  a retired judge. That is the last thing we want is a retired judge. I'm hoping next week
[01:40:14.660 --> 01:40:21.300]  to have someone on the Thursday night show who has been researching how judges get paid
[01:40:21.300 --> 01:40:32.260]  under the table. I want to talk to her because I want to figure out how to write discovery
[01:40:32.260 --> 01:40:44.220]  motions to discover the judges finances. Well they have to release them under the campaign
[01:40:44.220 --> 01:40:51.500]  law. Well here's what she's saying is going on. They're getting a mortgage against their
[01:40:51.500 --> 01:41:01.260]  property and the other guys paying it off for them. Okay. So I want to see my daughter
[01:41:01.260 --> 01:41:08.220]  is a CPA and she specialized in auditing. Everybody told her when she's going to college
[01:41:08.220 --> 01:41:14.420]  that she would hate it and she didn't listen. She got a degree in it, got out and went to
[01:41:14.420 --> 01:41:19.460]  work and hated it. So she's not doing that now but she's knowledgeable in that. So I'm
[01:41:19.460 --> 01:41:29.100]  going to go to her once I get on the details and see if I can figure out how to ask a question
[01:41:29.100 --> 01:41:38.620]  that will subtly point at where I'm looking. If you go up to the judge and push him he'll
[01:41:38.620 --> 01:41:45.260]  push back. It's in our genes. If I ask you to hold your hand up with your palm out and
[01:41:45.260 --> 01:41:52.940]  I set my palm against yours and I push you resist. It's in your genes. So we don't want
[01:41:52.940 --> 01:41:59.020]  to push him directly. So we want to figure out how to ask this appointed judge for financial
[01:41:59.020 --> 01:42:08.340]  information that will point at where he may be getting some funds he shouldn't be getting.
[01:42:08.340 --> 01:42:16.220]  She's saying that two-thirds of the federal judges are being paid off. And so there's
[01:42:16.220 --> 01:42:22.500]  a good chance this one is especially when a judge accuses himself they always want to
[01:42:22.500 --> 01:42:31.820]  bring in a ringer that will screw you big time to pay you back for getting a judge recused.
[01:42:31.820 --> 01:42:43.660]  In Pennsylvania do you have the right to challenge the first judge appointed? I asked that question
[01:42:43.660 --> 01:42:49.420]  because in Texas if you got an appointed judge you can move to strike that judge out
[01:42:49.420 --> 01:42:55.540]  of hand without cause. Yeah, well in this county there's only one so it kind of makes
[01:42:55.540 --> 01:43:00.100]  it difficult. But that doesn't matter. If it's an appointed judge they just have to
[01:43:00.100 --> 01:43:08.460]  go to another county and find another judge. Well he's an elected judge. Oh, okay. Then
[01:43:08.460 --> 01:43:16.300]  ask him for some financial records. Well I went to Harrisburg on their website and
[01:43:16.300 --> 01:43:24.140]  his most current financial records are eight years old. That's so ask him for some current.
[01:43:24.140 --> 01:43:31.140]  You might do some checking. Is he from Harrisburg? For those of you who don't know Harrisburg
[01:43:31.140 --> 01:43:39.420]  is the capital of Pennsylvania. West and south. Okay, you want to see if he has properties.
[01:43:39.420 --> 01:43:45.140]  You check with county recorders to see if he can find properties that he may have. And
[01:43:45.140 --> 01:43:51.380]  then you go look in the county recorders records and see if you see multiple mortgages
[01:43:51.380 --> 01:43:57.620]  on the property. Where there's a mortgage and a couple years later it's paid off and
[01:43:57.620 --> 01:44:03.300]  then there's another one and it's paid off. Nutritious food is real body armor. It builds
[01:44:03.300 --> 01:44:08.740]  muscle, burns fat, improves digestion and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:44:08.740 --> 01:44:12.980]  Did you know the US government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:44:12.980 --> 01:44:17.540]  and classified it as a schedule one drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant. People
[01:44:17.540 --> 01:44:22.260]  have been confused about this plan for over 80 years and many still don't know what hemp
[01:44:22.260 --> 01:44:27.980]  is. So now you know hemp is not marijuana and marijuana is not hemp. They are different
[01:44:27.980 --> 01:44:33.380]  varieties of the same species. Hempusa.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:44:33.380 --> 01:44:37.740]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you
[01:44:37.740 --> 01:44:44.420]  need to know about. Remember hemp protein powder contains 53% protein. It's gluten free, anti
[01:44:44.420 --> 01:44:53.900]  inflammatory, non-GMO and is loaded with nutrients. Call 888-910-4367. 888-910-4367
[01:44:53.900 --> 01:44:59.820]  and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you. Only at hempusa.org.
[01:44:59.820 --> 01:45:09.500]  It's the 2017 Logos Radio Network annual fundraiser sponsored by Central Texas Gunworks. Defense
[01:45:09.500 --> 01:45:16.100]  distributed in Fatsal, Delhi. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com and enter to win. Every $25 donation
[01:45:16.100 --> 01:45:21.460]  is a chance to win. From Central Texas Gunworks, first place up for grabs are Spikes Tactical
[01:45:21.460 --> 01:45:29.260]  AR-15. Second place, Taurus PT-111 G2 9mm Pistol. From Defense Distributed, third place,
[01:45:29.260 --> 01:45:36.340]  the AR-308 80% lower. Fourth place, the AR-15 8% lower. From Fatsal, Delhi, fifth place,
[01:45:36.340 --> 01:45:43.940]  $100 gift card for Fatsal, Delhi. Every $25 donation is a chance to win. That's LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:45:43.940 --> 01:45:48.980]  Also if you purchase Randy Kelton's e-book, Legal101, you get four chances to win. Purchase
[01:45:48.980 --> 01:45:54.380]  Eddie Craig's traffic seminar, get ten chances to win. And remember every $25 donation is
[01:45:54.380 --> 01:46:01.380]  a chance to win. Go to LogosRadioNetwork.com for details and donate today.
[01:46:01.380 --> 01:46:26.380]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton with Legal101 Radio and we're talking to John in Pennsylvania.
[01:46:26.380 --> 01:46:32.660]  And anyway, I kind of got you off topic, but the first judge that gets appointed after
[01:46:32.660 --> 01:46:43.300]  one is recused, I always am uncomfortable with. So you might try to take a close look
[01:46:43.300 --> 01:46:55.660]  at this guy or girl. Okay, start again, I had you muted. I forgot to unmute you.
[01:46:55.660 --> 01:47:01.500]  That's okay. If he's impersonating a public servant, I'm going to start right there and
[01:47:01.500 --> 01:47:07.260]  file a criminal complaint on him. Oh, that would be great fun. And you know,
[01:47:07.260 --> 01:47:11.660]  you got to expect that the judges are going to rule against you out of hand at every turn
[01:47:11.660 --> 01:47:18.780]  in any case. So getting them upset at you doesn't hurt anything. Getting them upset
[01:47:18.780 --> 01:47:27.780]  at you compromises them. Now if they rule against you, you can claim that it's retaliation
[01:47:27.780 --> 01:47:37.660]  because you filed this complaint against you. But it's their waters. It's a kind of garbage
[01:47:37.660 --> 01:47:47.300]  shyster lawyer's fault. I like dirty walking shyster lawyer tricks as long as I'm the
[01:47:47.300 --> 01:47:53.820]  one using them. Right. Now, here's another question I got. I expect a DA to just throw
[01:47:53.820 --> 01:48:02.340]  these in the trash can. So I want to take the DA. Okay, you're in Pennsylvania. Yeah,
[01:48:02.340 --> 01:48:07.860]  I came out there and did and came out there and did some seminars once and I looked into
[01:48:07.860 --> 01:48:20.340]  Pennsylvania law. Here's the deal. In Pennsylvania, a prosecuting attorney is given first blush.
[01:48:20.340 --> 01:48:27.380]  It's the only state that I know of that has it in code that a prosecuting attorney can
[01:48:27.380 --> 01:48:35.700]  essentially do an examining trial. Not exactly. He can look at the facts and determine whether
[01:48:35.700 --> 01:48:43.620]  or not he believes there's sufficient evidence to warrant a prosecution. Now, that seems
[01:48:43.620 --> 01:48:53.740]  like a problem. However, unlike every other state, when you file a criminal complaint
[01:48:53.740 --> 01:49:02.020]  in Pennsylvania, you have standing. When I file one in Texas, I'm only giving notice
[01:49:02.020 --> 01:49:09.420]  that I have no standing concerning that complaint. But in Pennsylvania, because they gave the
[01:49:09.420 --> 01:49:16.780]  prosecutor first blush, they gave you standing. So if he refuses to prosecute, you can then
[01:49:16.780 --> 01:49:26.060]  appeal to the court of common police. And this is what I suggest. The attorney general
[01:49:26.060 --> 01:49:35.020]  in Pennsylvania has prosecutorial power, unlike Texas. Texas, he doesn't. He can only help
[01:49:35.020 --> 01:49:42.540]  a prosecutor if he's asked. But in Pennsylvania, the attorney general has prosecutorial power.
[01:49:42.540 --> 01:49:48.060]  So you file with the prosecuting attorney and he's going to refuse to prosecute. So you
[01:49:48.060 --> 01:49:53.500]  appeal to the court of common police and at the same time, you file a criminal complaint
[01:49:53.500 --> 01:50:00.980]  with the attorney general stating that the prosecuting attorney did not make a determination
[01:50:00.980 --> 01:50:09.860]  of problem cause. He did not determine whether he did not exercise prosecutorial discretion.
[01:50:09.860 --> 01:50:17.660]  What he did was exercise prosecutorial caprice in that he did not determine if there was
[01:50:17.660 --> 01:50:25.060]  sufficient evidence. He determined who he wanted to prosecute and who he did not want
[01:50:25.060 --> 01:50:31.900]  to prosecute. And that is not a power that he has. So you ask the attorney general to
[01:50:31.900 --> 01:50:40.860]  prosecute the prosecutor. Well, you know what he's going to say. Heck no. So you file an
[01:50:40.860 --> 01:50:46.020]  appeal against him with the court of common police. And when the court of common police
[01:50:46.020 --> 01:50:53.940]  refuses to prosecute the cases, then you can appeal it all the way up to the supreme.
[01:50:53.940 --> 01:51:02.900]  Now, do I have to first appeal to district attorneys or can I wait and just appeal the
[01:51:02.900 --> 01:51:12.460]  attorney general through Fusel? Well, if you want to maintain the chain, you have to appeal
[01:51:12.460 --> 01:51:21.100]  to the court of common police on the prosecutor's decision. You ask the court of common police
[01:51:21.100 --> 01:51:26.780]  to initiate a prosecution. And then when they don't do it, you ask the next court all the
[01:51:26.780 --> 01:51:31.940]  way up to the supreme. And the reason you bring in the attorney general is cause he
[01:51:31.940 --> 01:51:39.660]  is not going to be a happy camper. He knows when he runs off his next time, you're going
[01:51:39.660 --> 01:51:47.020]  to take these complaints that you filed against him and give it to his political opponent.
[01:51:47.020 --> 01:51:51.620]  And his political opponents are going to wave it at everybody. And he's going to say, oh,
[01:51:51.620 --> 01:51:57.180]  these complaints, they were frivolous. But he knows the public will look at that and
[01:51:57.180 --> 01:52:05.940]  say where there's smoke, there must be fire. Perception is everything. You create political
[01:52:05.940 --> 01:52:10.900]  cannon fodder. You will never win your case simply because you have the law and the facts
[01:52:10.900 --> 01:52:16.380]  on your side. You will win the case if you have the politics on your side. Does that
[01:52:16.380 --> 01:52:24.020]  make sense, John? Yes. And our current attorney general is the second-ever democratic attorney
[01:52:24.020 --> 01:52:29.740]  general. And he wants to be governor next time. And his predecessor is going to jail
[01:52:29.740 --> 01:52:38.660]  for nine felonies. Oh, yes. So when you file a complaint against him, he's going to get
[01:52:38.660 --> 01:52:49.300]  apoplexy. I believe so. That puts him in an interesting position. You know, give him the
[01:52:49.300 --> 01:52:57.140]  opportunity to act before that occurs. Exactly. And gives him the opportunity to demonstrate
[01:52:57.140 --> 01:53:03.460]  to the public that he's a good, honest attorney general and will even go after dirty rotten
[01:53:03.460 --> 01:53:12.420]  scoundrel public officials. Well, not only that, he signed a pledge to be the most ethical
[01:53:12.420 --> 01:53:20.460]  attorney general ever and required everyone in his office to sign the same pledge. Oh,
[01:53:20.460 --> 01:53:29.900]  you need to send the complaint and in a separate envelope put a brand new dime in there and
[01:53:29.900 --> 01:53:36.540]  put a letter in there that says, since I was going to put you on one of these, I figured
[01:53:36.540 --> 01:53:45.900]  the least I could do is give it to you. I did that to my prosecutor. I went into his
[01:53:45.900 --> 01:53:52.180]  office and reached in my pocket, took out a dime and put it on the desk. And he said,
[01:53:52.180 --> 01:53:58.380]  Mr. Kelton, what's that for? I said, well, since I was going to put you on one, I figured
[01:53:58.380 --> 01:54:05.260]  the least I could do is bring it. Oh, Mr. Kelton, you give me such a pain in the rear.
[01:54:05.260 --> 01:54:15.820]  Well, good for you. He just didn't find me as funny as I did. But you know, it sounds
[01:54:15.820 --> 01:54:24.980]  like you have a good political attorney general. And actually, if you make your case well to
[01:54:24.980 --> 01:54:31.460]  the attorney general, he might actually pick it up. Well, it's real simple. He says I'm
[01:54:31.460 --> 01:54:38.300]  from the Supreme Court. They say he's not. Yeah, so there's not much to the case. This
[01:54:38.300 --> 01:54:46.900]  is the kind of thing that someone who's politically oriented would tend to pick up.
[01:54:46.900 --> 01:54:52.460]  Well, I've talked to two local politicians and they both said, go talk to the attorney
[01:54:52.460 --> 01:54:54.460]  general. He wants these things.
[01:54:54.460 --> 01:55:00.740]  They're perfect. He wants to make a name for himself. But I don't know if he wants to make
[01:55:00.740 --> 01:55:01.740]  it this way.
[01:55:01.740 --> 01:55:12.940]  Well, if he doesn't, then you kick him in his political teeth. If he doesn't act, then
[01:55:12.940 --> 01:55:21.460]  you send him notice that you have reason to believe he is shielding this judge from prostitution
[01:55:21.460 --> 01:55:26.420]  and ask him to show you why you shouldn't file against him for shielding the judge.
[01:55:26.420 --> 01:55:35.020]  So that's fair warning. And he might see the political benefit.
[01:55:35.020 --> 01:55:40.700]  Well, all the bad guys so far are Republicans.
[01:55:40.700 --> 01:55:49.860]  Oh, perfect. If this judge is a Republican, let me tell you a quick little story. Remember
[01:55:49.860 --> 01:55:59.260]  Tom DeLay, Speaker of the House. Remember, he got prosecuted. Yes, you know how that
[01:55:59.260 --> 01:56:03.740]  happened. Don't remember. I remember.
[01:56:03.740 --> 01:56:13.660]  Ron, Ron or district attorney for Travis County. Prosecuted Tom DeLay and nobody ever accused
[01:56:13.660 --> 01:56:24.780]  Tom DeLay of a crime. I filed a habeas corpus in the case. Dick DeGaron, the guy that defended
[01:56:24.780 --> 01:56:31.220]  the branch divisions and lost, he called me. Are you the one that filed a habeas corpus?
[01:56:31.220 --> 01:56:38.740]  I said, yes, I am. Well, I'm the lead attorney and I didn't authorize it. Authorize it.
[01:56:38.740 --> 01:56:46.780]  You should have filed it. They hung up on me. So we go to, he goes to trial. They pick
[01:56:46.780 --> 01:56:52.420]  a jury, go out to lunch, come back and judge Deets is talking to the jury and I stood
[01:56:52.420 --> 01:57:00.020]  up in the courtroom. I had came in and handed the habeas to Tom DeLay in the courtroom.
[01:57:00.020 --> 01:57:04.180]  So I stand up and I said, your honor, my name is Randall Kelton and I have business with
[01:57:04.180 --> 01:57:08.980]  this court that supersedes any business now before the court.
[01:57:08.980 --> 01:57:15.340]  You're the one with the habeas. Yes, as a matter of fact, I am. He proceeded to have
[01:57:15.340 --> 01:57:24.980]  me thrown out of the courtroom. My court watchers inside said they could hear me outside insisting
[01:57:24.980 --> 01:57:34.460]  that the bailiff go in there and drag the judge off the bench and arrest him. Tom DeLay.
[01:57:34.460 --> 01:57:43.220]  Tom DeLay took him out. Okay. A couple years later, he's retiring. I filed criminal charges
[01:57:43.220 --> 01:57:48.940]  against all of the highest judges in Texas. 15 judges of the court of criminal appeals.
[01:57:48.940 --> 01:57:57.460]  These who got two high courts supreme handle civil court of criminal appeals handles criminal.
[01:57:57.460 --> 01:58:03.900]  I filed a habeas with them. They demanded a motion for leave to file. I said, screw that.
[01:58:03.900 --> 01:58:09.420]  The great writ writ of right. This court has no power to grant or deny leave to file. Well,
[01:58:09.420 --> 01:58:13.260]  the clerk wouldn't take it without it. I'm trying to get this kid out of jail. One of
[01:58:13.260 --> 01:58:19.780]  my fights, so I filed motion for leave. They denied me leave to file a habeas. I said, are
[01:58:19.780 --> 01:58:24.740]  you kidding me? So I made up a criminal set of criminal complaints and took it to grand
[01:58:24.740 --> 01:58:31.220]  jury. It took me a year to get them to take it. But the first day I took it down there
[01:58:31.220 --> 01:58:36.260]  and they started the prosecuting attorney intercepted them when I tried to get them to the grand
[01:58:36.260 --> 01:58:42.780]  jury. The next day the court of criminal court of criminal appeals had this kid released
[01:58:42.780 --> 01:58:50.340]  from jail. So that part worked. It took me a year. I finally got him.
[01:58:50.340 --> 01:58:55.780]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world. Yet countless readers are frustrated
[01:58:55.780 --> 01:59:00.980]  because they struggle to understand it. Some new translations try to help by simplifying
[01:59:00.980 --> 01:59:07.460]  the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture. Enter
[01:59:07.460 --> 01:59:13.660]  the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the
[01:59:13.660 --> 01:59:19.980]  real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes. Difficult and profound passages
[01:59:19.980 --> 01:59:25.420]  are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond
[01:59:25.420 --> 01:59:30.580]  which you've ever experienced before. Bibles for America would like to give you a free
[01:59:30.580 --> 01:59:36.580]  recovery version simply for the asking. This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours
[01:59:36.580 --> 01:59:46.580]  just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:46.580 --> 02:00:06.580]  That's freestudybible.com. You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.