[00:09.700 --> 00:12.860] has skeletons. [00:12.860 --> 00:16.540] And when you come in there and they don't know what your agenda is, every one of them, [00:16.540 --> 00:20.940] the more corrupt they are, the more susceptible they are. [00:20.940 --> 00:25.940] They'll run home to their deepest, darkest closet and they'll peek in there at their [00:25.940 --> 00:32.080] skeletons they got in there and they are certain I know what's in there and they're the one [00:32.080 --> 00:33.080] I'm at. [00:33.080 --> 00:41.540] In recent news, Chinese President Xi Jinping placed a call by request of and to President [00:41.540 --> 00:45.640] Donald Trump earlier Tuesday to discuss the heated buildup and militarization of the Korean [00:45.640 --> 00:46.640] peninsula. [00:46.640 --> 00:50.440] Over the weekend, the U.S. redirected a naval strike group to the western Pacific Ocean [00:50.440 --> 00:54.640] instead of making a port visit to Australia with word of Japanese ships meeting up with [00:54.640 --> 00:55.640] the strike group. [00:55.640 --> 00:59.800] And though the reason for doing so hasn't been revealed by President Trump or the DOD, [00:59.800 --> 01:04.040] it seems clear that the U.S. is responding to nearly half a dozen nuclear tests and multiple [01:04.040 --> 01:07.960] missile launches that have been illegally conducted by North Korea over the years. [01:07.960 --> 01:10.680] However, North Korea is claiming self-defense. [01:10.680 --> 01:15.340] Their foreign minister was quoted as saying early Sunday that what happened in Syria once [01:15.340 --> 01:20.040] again taught a bitter lesson that one can defend oneself from the imperialistic aggression [01:20.040 --> 01:22.040] only when one has one strength. [01:22.040 --> 01:26.400] Any aggression should be countered with force only and we are entirely just when we have [01:26.400 --> 01:28.940] bolstered our nuclear force remarkably. [01:28.940 --> 01:33.340] Just last week, President Xi Jinping and President Trump held face-to-face talks in Florida where [01:33.340 --> 01:36.900] the issue of North Korea, according to Trump, was discussed. [01:36.900 --> 01:40.960] The People's Daily, the official Communist Party mouthpiece, said Xi Jinping stressed [01:40.960 --> 01:45.640] that China insists on realizing the goal of denuclearization of the peninsula, insists [01:45.640 --> 01:49.980] on maintaining peace and stability on the peninsula, advocates resolving the problem [01:49.980 --> 01:54.320] through peaceful means, and is willing to maintain communication and coordination with [01:54.320 --> 01:55.320] the U.S. [01:55.320 --> 01:59.360] The call between leaders was also made a day after Trump tweeted, North Korea is looking [01:59.360 --> 02:00.360] for trouble. [02:00.360 --> 02:02.800] If China decides to help, that would be great. [02:02.800 --> 02:05.360] If not, we will solve the problem without them. [02:05.360 --> 02:09.640] North Korean state media did warn yesterday that the revolutionary strong army is keenly [02:09.640 --> 02:14.480] watching every move by U.S. elements with their nuclear sites focused on the U.S. invasionary [02:14.480 --> 02:20.760] bases not only in South Korea and in the Pacific Operation Theater, but also in the U.S. mainland. [02:20.760 --> 02:24.520] To up the ante, this Saturday, North Korea is expected to hold a huge military parade [02:24.520 --> 02:29.640] to celebrate the 105th birthday of its founding president, Kim Sung, and with the 85th anniversary [02:29.640 --> 02:34.160] of the creation of the Korean People's Army on April 25th, the expected customary military [02:34.160 --> 02:37.360] parade in the capital city is predictable. [02:37.360 --> 02:41.440] Let's just hope and pray that people consider the wise words of Chinese Foreign Minister [02:41.440 --> 02:43.600] spokesman Liu Kang. [02:43.600 --> 02:48.800] All relevant parties should exercise restraint and keep calm, ease tension instead of provoking [02:48.800 --> 02:53.920] each other and adding fuel to the fire. [02:53.920 --> 03:17.000] This was Rick Brody with your Lowdown for April 12th, 2017. [03:17.000 --> 03:31.320] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Darren in Pennsylvania. [03:31.320 --> 03:37.280] And it's subtle what turns out to be the most powerful. [03:37.280 --> 03:44.800] And you go in and pick a fight, they don't have any way of dealing with you. [03:44.800 --> 03:49.120] Even if you already have an issue in the court, now one thing I tell people is when you go [03:49.120 --> 03:53.880] into a courthouse, you've got two hats. [03:53.880 --> 03:58.260] You've got a litigant's hat and you've got a master's hat. [03:58.260 --> 04:01.960] If one of your public servants steps across one of your legal lines, you take off that [04:01.960 --> 04:07.640] litigant's hat, put on that master's hat, and you walk through them like a bull in a [04:07.640 --> 04:10.120] china shop. [04:10.120 --> 04:13.880] There's nothing they can do. [04:13.880 --> 04:22.560] One word out of anybody, oh, you gotta be careful, you can get in a lot of trouble. [04:22.560 --> 04:28.200] Witness tampering, 3605, obstruction of justice, 3606, that's in Texas. [04:28.200 --> 04:32.220] Every other state's gonna have both of those. [04:32.220 --> 04:38.320] And official misconduct or official oppression, these things build up quickly. [04:38.320 --> 04:46.680] These public officials just don't realize how many crimes they have to commit in order [04:46.680 --> 04:53.680] to railroad a citizen, and for the most part, citizens just don't know. [04:53.680 --> 04:57.640] Okay, I forgot to bring you back on. [04:57.640 --> 05:01.740] Did you have any other questions that you wanted to ask that I didn't get to? [05:01.740 --> 05:04.000] You got me launched on my favorite subject. [05:04.000 --> 05:08.400] Right, no, and I was looking for, well, I have one other comment, but I was just looking [05:08.400 --> 05:13.480] for a top 10 list of the things to look for to file a grievance, bar grievance against. [05:13.480 --> 05:17.320] And I just wanted to let you know, I talked to Frank Waldo the other day, and he said [05:17.320 --> 05:23.700] that you had a bar grievance website that you had put together and were working on trying [05:23.700 --> 05:24.700] to get it up and going. [05:24.700 --> 05:28.340] He wanted to know if you could give him a sit rep on that. [05:28.340 --> 05:38.580] It's kind of broken at the moment, but I finally have a programmer on board. [05:38.580 --> 05:46.580] And the reason I haven't went in and fixed all these is I'm building a structure to support [05:46.580 --> 05:49.560] this electronic lawyer. [05:49.560 --> 05:57.520] And all of these tools I'll integrate into this particular tool. [05:57.520 --> 06:06.920] Having a set of questionnaires, and if I ask a question of, did the opposing counsel and [06:06.920 --> 06:11.520] the judge have an ex parte hearing without notifying you or your counsel? [06:11.520 --> 06:23.200] If you say yes, that implicates a motion to dismiss, a motion to disqualify the judge. [06:23.200 --> 06:28.040] It implicates a number of things in the instant case. [06:28.040 --> 06:36.640] But it also implicates American Bar Association model standards, it implicates judicial conduct [06:36.640 --> 06:44.880] canons and may indicate criminal malpractice, even a suit against the judge. [06:44.880 --> 06:45.880] So all of these- [06:45.880 --> 06:59.800] I'm building a tool so that when you answer the question that way, I got this link that [06:59.800 --> 07:01.100] pops up. [07:01.100 --> 07:10.100] You click this link and it will say this particular answer implicates this code. [07:10.100 --> 07:19.640] You click on that one, it opens up a questionnaire for the Bar Association standards or the judicial [07:19.640 --> 07:25.220] conduct canons, the penal code, and it'll take you right to the section in the penal [07:25.220 --> 07:29.600] code that's relevant to that issue. [07:29.600 --> 07:38.460] The idea about this is, is you have this incredibly large body of law. [07:38.460 --> 07:45.120] You walk into the legal library and these rows and rows of books, and you have no idea [07:45.120 --> 07:46.700] where to look. [07:46.700 --> 07:56.380] So I ask you a question, is your case related to a civil suit or criminal prosecution? [07:56.380 --> 08:00.800] You answer, I just cut that whole law library in half. [08:00.800 --> 08:08.440] Was it a, you say criminal, okay, was it a ticket or was it a penal code violation? [08:08.440 --> 08:12.040] I'll just cut it about in half again. [08:12.040 --> 08:16.640] So we break the library down very quickly. [08:16.640 --> 08:19.720] But in doing this, go ahead. [08:19.720 --> 08:22.880] It's like 21 question. [08:22.880 --> 08:23.880] Exactly like that. [08:23.880 --> 08:24.880] I use that all the time. [08:24.880 --> 08:29.320] It is, in 20 questions, you can get to anything. [08:29.320 --> 08:35.640] American Bar Association model standards in four questions, I can get you to any standard. [08:35.640 --> 08:44.080] And so we take this huge body of law and we will literally turn it into a neural net. [08:44.080 --> 08:45.880] Everything is interlinked. [08:45.880 --> 08:54.800] And once you go through this line of questioning, everything that's implicated is included. [08:54.800 --> 08:59.080] You know, if you've done any legal research, you'll recognize this problem. [08:59.080 --> 09:06.320] I spend weeks researching an issue and I've had lawyers complain about the same thing. [09:06.320 --> 09:11.320] Don't matter how much time you spend researching an issue, you know that when you get into [09:11.320 --> 09:17.360] court that jack leg on the other side, he will have found a case that you missed and [09:17.360 --> 09:21.800] he's going to wipe the floor with you. [09:21.800 --> 09:25.320] Lawyers hate to do legal research because they have that terror. [09:25.320 --> 09:30.360] Now, prosays can miss stuff, but learning counsel can't. [09:30.360 --> 09:33.700] They can get them out of practice suit if they miss something. [09:33.700 --> 09:35.540] So it makes them crazy. [09:35.540 --> 09:43.000] So they tend to focus their practice in finely tuned areas so that they can get everything [09:43.000 --> 09:44.000] down. [09:44.000 --> 09:52.240] Over this questionnaire, we bring in a prosay and he's got everything. [09:52.240 --> 09:58.280] If there's anything implicated that he doesn't have, it is so obscure, these lawyers aren't [09:58.280 --> 10:01.240] going to know about it either. [10:01.240 --> 10:06.960] But if something comes up that we hadn't addressed, we just go into the questionnaire, break it [10:06.960 --> 10:12.560] apart, insert that where it goes, stitch it back together. [10:12.560 --> 10:20.040] We will have, we can literally eliminate the profession of lawyer and get lawyers to pay [10:20.040 --> 10:21.040] us to do it. [10:21.040 --> 10:30.960] That's the biggest problem is the lawyers are so greedy and corrupt and like you said [10:30.960 --> 10:36.640] earlier, something, their only job is to keep you from having any reason to appeal. [10:36.640 --> 10:39.080] That really what they were there for. [10:39.080 --> 10:42.280] I wish it was that easy. [10:42.280 --> 10:50.260] But when you look at where a lawyer lives, lawyers are terrified of everything. [10:50.260 --> 10:59.120] One thing I'm certain of, there is no lawyer I've ever talked to who went and spent 160 [10:59.120 --> 11:06.020] to $180,000 and spent six to eight years in college so that he could get out and spend [11:06.020 --> 11:15.000] the rest of his professional career kissing some arrogant judges behind, but that is the [11:15.000 --> 11:17.240] reality. [11:17.240 --> 11:19.760] These lawyers are terrified of those judges. [11:19.760 --> 11:26.800] The judge can sanction him, he can pull his bar card, he has really got to be careful [11:26.800 --> 11:33.240] and he's got to play to the personal passions of those judges. [11:33.240 --> 11:34.600] Pro se's don't have to bother with that. [11:34.600 --> 11:39.680] We don't care because this judge is not gonna be able to screw my next client or jerk my [11:39.680 --> 11:44.320] bar card that I spent six to eight years to get. [11:44.320 --> 11:49.880] So I would not want to be a lawyer, that's difficult. [11:49.880 --> 11:53.880] And they have pressures that we don't know about. [11:53.880 --> 11:59.080] Like when we bar grieve them, man, that stings them big time. [11:59.080 --> 12:06.000] No recourse, there is absolutely nothing they can do, they are hanging in the wind. [12:06.000 --> 12:13.760] While I understand the position of the lawyer, and I sympathize with his position, life is [12:13.760 --> 12:17.000] tough Bubba, deal with it. [12:17.000 --> 12:24.280] It's not about harming the lawyers, I don't care to harm a lawyer. [12:24.280 --> 12:29.960] I filed criminal charges and I never want anybody indicted. [12:29.960 --> 12:35.120] But I didn't want them to do that garbage that gave me cause to file against him either. [12:35.120 --> 12:37.960] Right that's exactly right. [12:37.960 --> 12:43.400] If we're gonna fix this, pardon me? [12:43.400 --> 12:45.720] We just want them to do right by everyone. [12:45.720 --> 12:50.240] That's what we all grow up and think that's what lawyers are supposed to do and they don't [12:50.240 --> 12:51.240] do that. [12:51.240 --> 12:52.240] And they can't. [12:52.240 --> 13:00.720] You gotta understand about your lawyer, the only thing he wants from you is a retainer. [13:00.720 --> 13:04.760] Making money as a lawyer is about retainers. [13:04.760 --> 13:08.880] You go to a lawyer, he feeds you this song and dance a salsa down your pants, tells you [13:08.880 --> 13:16.080] what a great case you got and he'll win you all this money, I need $5,000 retainer. [13:16.080 --> 13:21.920] When he gets that $5,000 retainer, he's got this drawer full of motions. [13:21.920 --> 13:26.880] He's got motions and he's got responses to motions. [13:26.880 --> 13:30.840] He'll take out one of those motions, put your name on the top of it, fill in a couple details [13:30.840 --> 13:31.840] and file it. [13:31.840 --> 13:38.160] You're on the other side to get that motion and he's got it probably 100 times. [13:38.160 --> 13:45.120] You pull out his answer, fill in a few lines, put your name on it, file it as a response, [13:45.120 --> 13:52.000] they'll both bill you against your retainer, two or 300 bucks. [13:52.000 --> 13:53.000] Right. [13:53.000 --> 13:58.800] Dr. Graves, go ahead, I keep losing you. [13:58.800 --> 14:02.800] Sorry, that was, yeah, basically they're billing you for something they didn't have to do they've [14:02.800 --> 14:04.520] already done. [14:04.520 --> 14:06.180] Exactly. [14:06.180 --> 14:12.040] So Dr. Graves talks about this flurry of motions at the beginning of a case. [14:12.040 --> 14:15.520] They're just using up your retainer. [14:15.520 --> 14:20.840] Once your retainer's used up, now they're at the point to where they're gonna have to [14:20.840 --> 14:24.160] start doing real lawyering. [14:24.160 --> 14:30.920] And they don't make as much money doing real lawyering as they do getting retainers. [14:30.920 --> 14:36.000] So now they'll come back and say, my goodness, this is a lot more difficult than we thought. [14:36.000 --> 14:44.040] I'm gonna need three times the amount in retainer and oh, I can't do that where you'll have [14:44.040 --> 14:45.420] to go get another lawyer. [14:45.420 --> 14:46.420] So he dumps you. [14:46.420 --> 14:50.880] When it gets to the hard part, he wants to get rid of you and go out and get, he makes [14:50.880 --> 14:54.200] more money getting retainers than he does fighting cases. [14:54.200 --> 14:55.200] Right. [14:55.200 --> 15:03.240] That may not be right, but the lawyer is in business to make money and he's got to pay [15:03.240 --> 15:07.080] his help, he's got to pay his malpractice insurance because it's gonna get real steep [15:07.080 --> 15:10.080] after he's messed with one of us. [15:10.080 --> 15:13.880] And the reality is he has to make money. [15:13.880 --> 15:19.280] We may not like it and the lawyer may not like it, but it's what he has to deal with. [15:19.280 --> 15:26.520] Okay, so we have to fix it so that we can change the system. [15:26.520 --> 15:29.000] He can't do it. [15:29.000 --> 15:32.920] I know a large number of police officers. [15:32.920 --> 15:38.560] I don't know a single police officer who became a police officer so that he could be a jack [15:38.560 --> 15:39.560] booty thug. [15:39.560 --> 15:40.560] Right. [15:40.560 --> 15:44.000] They want to be the good, they want to be the good guys. [15:44.000 --> 15:45.000] They want to help people. [15:45.000 --> 15:46.000] Right. [15:46.000 --> 15:54.160] And they get in this profession and they realize what a horrible mess it is, but they're inside [15:54.160 --> 15:55.160] it. [15:55.160 --> 15:59.320] They can't fix it from the inside. [15:59.320 --> 16:03.080] So they need us. [16:03.080 --> 16:08.360] Okay, we may have to sting the officer a bit, but it's about fixing the system. [16:08.360 --> 16:16.280] I filed criminal charges against a Texas Ranger for following Department of Public Safety [16:16.280 --> 16:17.280] policy. [16:17.280 --> 16:22.360] Sorry, Bubba, the policy's in violation of the law. [16:22.360 --> 16:23.880] Take it up with your boss. [16:23.880 --> 16:29.040] It gives him and all the other Rangers a plausible deniability. [16:29.040 --> 16:30.040] Hang on. [16:30.040 --> 16:31.040] About to go to break. [16:31.040 --> 16:32.040] Randy Kelton. [16:32.040 --> 16:33.040] Rule of law radio. [16:33.040 --> 16:36.720] Call in number 512-646-1984. [16:36.720 --> 16:37.720] Call boards are empty. [16:37.720 --> 16:38.720] Without plenty of room. [16:38.720 --> 16:39.720] Give us a call. [16:39.720 --> 17:03.600] If you have a question or comment, we'll be right back. [17:03.600 --> 17:09.840] Hi, Cookie Munchers, no, these are yucky cookies, cookies, yucky, no, no bad cookies, you can't [17:09.840 --> 17:11.240] even eat these cookies. [17:11.240 --> 17:12.800] These are cyber cookies. [17:12.800 --> 17:16.960] No, no, they are cyber cookies and they clog up your computer. [17:16.960 --> 17:17.960] These have Apple. [17:17.960 --> 17:18.960] Really? [17:18.960 --> 17:20.960] Oh, that's an actual Apple. [17:20.960 --> 17:21.960] Yummy. [17:21.960 --> 17:22.960] Apple. [17:22.960 --> 17:26.880] I'm going to throw away these yucky cookies in the trash. [17:26.880 --> 17:33.080] I click control, shift, delete, and then scroll down to cookies and clear them. [17:33.080 --> 17:34.480] I buy yucky cookies. [17:34.480 --> 17:40.280] Now I go to logosradionetwork.com and I click on the Amazon box on the upper right hand [17:40.280 --> 17:46.280] side, bookmark the link, and I can go to Amazon through this link and order you some yummy [17:46.280 --> 17:47.280] new cookie. [17:47.280 --> 17:49.080] New cookies for me? [17:49.080 --> 17:51.120] Consider it an early Christmas present. [17:51.120 --> 17:55.920] And every time I order on Amazon, I go through this link and I give a little present to this [17:55.920 --> 17:57.640] radio network too. [17:57.640 --> 17:59.640] These are for cookie. [17:59.640 --> 18:00.640] These are classified. [18:00.640 --> 18:05.720] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [18:05.720 --> 18:09.400] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meris proven method. [18:09.400 --> 18:13.740] Michael Meris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you [18:13.740 --> 18:14.740] can win too. [18:14.740 --> 18:19.560] You'll get step by step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [18:19.560 --> 18:25.440] civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer [18:25.440 --> 18:29.960] letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the [18:29.960 --> 18:34.160] financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:34.160 --> 18:38.960] The Michael Meris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:38.960 --> 18:41.440] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:41.440 --> 18:46.960] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Meris banner [18:46.960 --> 18:49.640] or email MichaelMeris at Yahoo.com. [18:49.640 --> 18:59.520] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at Yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors [18:59.520 --> 19:00.520] now. [19:00.520 --> 19:05.520] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:05.520 --> 19:18.720] Well, don't let nothing get to you, only the father can deliver you, so don't let bad mind [19:18.720 --> 19:27.360] people hurt you until they start getting behind you, you know what I mean, my friend, and [19:27.360 --> 19:28.880] all that jazz music. [19:28.880 --> 19:35.960] And okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, we're talking to Darren in Pennsylvania. [19:35.960 --> 19:42.840] And the other thing that's really powerful that we can do is filing criminal complaints. [19:42.840 --> 19:52.880] I just filed a criminal complaint against a federal judge for what he did on the bench. [19:52.880 --> 19:56.720] This is kind of a different take. [19:56.720 --> 20:05.080] The judges, you know, they tell you that if you don't like what I rule, then you can appeal. [20:05.080 --> 20:12.960] And I've been looking at law, and the way I read the code, every state has a statute [20:12.960 --> 20:21.800] that reflects 18 U.S. Code 242, the Ku Klux Klan Act, that essentially says, yeah, essentially [20:21.800 --> 20:26.840] that Pennsylvania definitely has it, that if a public official exerts or purports to [20:26.840 --> 20:31.920] exert an authority they do not expressly have, or fails to perform a duty they're required [20:31.920 --> 20:36.480] to perform, and in the process denies a citizen in the full and free access to or enjoyment [20:36.480 --> 20:40.680] of a right, that's class A misdemeanor, next thing to a felony. [20:40.680 --> 20:47.040] So when I go into a courtroom, and the judge has the duty to determine the facts in accordance [20:47.040 --> 20:51.880] with the rules of evidence, then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the [20:51.880 --> 20:52.880] case. [20:52.880 --> 20:54.320] But he doesn't do that. [20:54.320 --> 21:02.720] He operates from some other motive and fails to apply the law, the facts and the law to [21:02.720 --> 21:04.840] the case. [21:04.840 --> 21:12.400] The way I read the code, that's a class A misdemeanor, certainly in Texas, and certainly [21:12.400 --> 21:16.600] in Pennsylvania, and most every other state. [21:16.600 --> 21:22.720] So why are we not fighting criminally against the judge when he commits a crime on the bench? [21:22.720 --> 21:26.080] Well, I think it's knowledge. [21:26.080 --> 21:29.520] I think a lot of people don't realize that that's a possibility. [21:29.520 --> 21:32.000] Some of us fear. [21:32.000 --> 21:37.480] People are scared of the judges, and we all have to overcome that. [21:37.480 --> 21:44.840] That's what this, what I do is all about, getting over that fear. [21:44.840 --> 21:49.280] It took me a long time to understand that fear. [21:49.280 --> 21:55.800] I went to a hearing with somebody who had a ticket, I didn't have one, so I didn't have [21:55.800 --> 21:58.080] a dog in the hut. [21:58.080 --> 22:02.580] It's nice to go down and watch the court when you don't have a dog in the hut. [22:02.580 --> 22:07.760] You get a whole different perspective. [22:07.760 --> 22:11.320] All these folks are out in the hall and they're all huffing and puffing, boy, I'm gonna get [22:11.320 --> 22:16.760] that the policeman fired and blah, blah, blah. [22:16.760 --> 22:23.900] This one guy out there, older gentleman, really nice expensive suit, and he's kind of standoffish. [22:23.900 --> 22:27.520] He's looking at everybody else like they're peons. [22:27.520 --> 22:31.000] He had a CEO look about him. [22:31.000 --> 22:34.960] We go into court and they called him up first. [22:34.960 --> 22:42.640] He's got some papers with notes on it he's trying to work from. [22:42.640 --> 22:51.160] But he is so nervous, the papers are shaking till he can't read it, and he can barely talk. [22:51.160 --> 22:56.080] And I'm thinking, what in the world is going on? [22:56.080 --> 23:00.720] This is not the guy I saw out in the hall, what just happened? [23:00.720 --> 23:05.000] It took me a while to understand what was going on. [23:05.000 --> 23:13.520] You and I, we are required to go to school for 12 years, government mandated school system. [23:13.520 --> 23:15.480] It's not our choice. [23:15.480 --> 23:20.860] And generally for the vast majority of the public, that's the only time we have anything [23:20.860 --> 23:22.880] to do with public officials. [23:22.880 --> 23:30.340] Then we get pulled over for a ticket and we go down to court. [23:30.340 --> 23:38.400] What behavioral set do we have to draw on when we go into court? [23:38.400 --> 23:39.400] We don't do that. [23:39.400 --> 23:44.980] You know, we go live our lives and we've got behavioral sets for most everything else, [23:44.980 --> 23:46.880] but not for court. [23:46.880 --> 23:48.240] So we get called into court. [23:48.240 --> 23:55.400] We go back to our only experience with government officials, school. [23:55.400 --> 24:04.200] I stood there and looked at this older executive and he reminded me of a sixth grader being [24:04.200 --> 24:08.240] sent to the principal. [24:08.240 --> 24:14.840] That's the only behavioral set he had for this situation. [24:14.840 --> 24:17.000] We need to fix that. [24:17.000 --> 24:26.840] Primarily what I'm doing on this show is I'm trying to juxtapose being sent to the principal [24:26.840 --> 24:32.240] with a parent going to the principal wanting to know what in the heck are you doing to [24:32.240 --> 24:34.680] my kids? [24:34.680 --> 24:36.920] That is a whole different behavioral set. [24:36.920 --> 24:38.720] That makes sense. [24:38.720 --> 24:44.800] I mean, I've been in some situations in court and I'm starting to learn how to take care [24:44.800 --> 24:45.800] of that. [24:45.800 --> 24:52.680] And I'll just give you a brief of some family law issues where I'm fighting on custody. [24:52.680 --> 24:58.760] They had filed my opposing counsel and my ex had filed a contempt charge for a vacation [24:58.760 --> 24:59.760] that I did. [24:59.760 --> 25:01.680] They said it was a violation of the order. [25:01.680 --> 25:06.560] And when I went in there, the judge started out by saying, it appears we have a misinterpretation [25:06.560 --> 25:08.440] of the order. [25:08.440 --> 25:11.760] And I said, no, sir, we're not here about a misinterpretation of the order. [25:11.760 --> 25:13.600] We're here about contempt. [25:13.600 --> 25:15.080] That's what's properly before the court. [25:15.080 --> 25:16.080] And I turned that judge around. [25:16.080 --> 25:20.720] I had to do it three times to him because he kept wanting to go back to modifying the [25:20.720 --> 25:21.720] order. [25:21.720 --> 25:23.680] And I said, that's not what we're here for. [25:23.680 --> 25:26.440] We're here because you ordered me here for contempt. [25:26.440 --> 25:27.920] That's what we're going to hear. [25:27.920 --> 25:28.920] That's it. [25:28.920 --> 25:31.640] We're not talking about anything else. [25:31.640 --> 25:34.980] And he kept going back and back to this. [25:34.980 --> 25:39.880] And I said, listen, if you want to talk about Thanksgiving, which is what the holiday was, [25:39.880 --> 25:41.280] it wasn't stipulated in the order. [25:41.280 --> 25:45.400] I said, then we can talk about Easter and St. Patrick's Day and everything else. [25:45.400 --> 25:48.920] But we're going to do that after we handle this contempt charge because that's what we're [25:48.920 --> 25:49.920] here for. [25:49.920 --> 25:51.640] That's what's properly before the court. [25:51.640 --> 25:54.320] That's what I'm prepared to handle. [25:54.320 --> 25:59.800] And he basically dismissed the contempt right there, that there was no willful contempt [25:59.800 --> 26:01.800] because I explained the situation. [26:01.800 --> 26:06.720] But he wanted me to sit there like a little school kid, like you're saying, and I can't [26:06.720 --> 26:07.720] do that anymore. [26:07.720 --> 26:09.720] I'm being taken advantage of. [26:09.720 --> 26:13.960] I'm trying to learn everything that I can and your radio show helps with that. [26:13.960 --> 26:17.480] You know, I'm doing some other things on the side, the how to win in court. [26:17.480 --> 26:21.880] I have that course, you know, trying to raise a two year old at the same time. [26:21.880 --> 26:26.200] So but the fear, the fear is the biggest thing to overcome. [26:26.200 --> 26:29.000] And you can't do it without the knowledge. [26:29.000 --> 26:31.800] You have to know what their routine is. [26:31.800 --> 26:39.680] Yes, everything I do on this show is essentially focused toward that. [26:39.680 --> 26:47.800] That's my primary purpose is to is to create a different behavioral set. [26:47.800 --> 26:56.520] When you go in from the perspective of they're the servants, you're the master. [26:56.520 --> 27:05.200] If we can do that juxtaposition, then you get to draw on a different set of behavioral [27:05.200 --> 27:09.040] resources, right? [27:09.040 --> 27:17.920] And when I get this tool finally up and running, it's been seven years working on it. [27:17.920 --> 27:23.240] It's difficult because it is, well, I say it's difficult, it's not really that it's [27:23.240 --> 27:28.760] so difficult, it's that it's so detailed, right? [27:28.760 --> 27:33.160] I have to come up with every question we can think of. [27:33.160 --> 27:40.400] Now if you just look at the law from the outside and consider the law in conjunction with the [27:40.400 --> 27:49.440] facts, it looks like the law is infinitely variable based on the facts, facts of a case. [27:49.440 --> 27:52.220] Not true. [27:52.220 --> 27:59.540] This is one of the lessons this project taught me because I ask these questions and the way [27:59.540 --> 28:05.160] I do it is I assume the guy always says yes no matter what I ask and then when I get to [28:05.160 --> 28:10.360] the last question, then I back up to the one before it and assume he said no and I follow [28:10.360 --> 28:15.080] that out and then I back up again, I keep backing up until I get to the front. [28:15.080 --> 28:23.680] Well what happens is as I'm backing up, the guy says no, I'll ask one, two, maybe three [28:23.680 --> 28:28.440] questions and then I'll go right back to the same issues I would have went to anyway. [28:28.440 --> 28:34.080] So I go up and pull those questions down and it doubles that section of the map and as [28:34.080 --> 28:40.000] I move toward the beginning, each time I pull some down, the whole map doubles in size. [28:40.000 --> 28:42.440] So it gets real big real fast. [28:42.440 --> 28:51.640] I loaded the questionnaire for DUI into my wife's brand new notebook computer. [28:51.640 --> 28:54.320] Took it 30 minutes to open the file. [28:54.320 --> 28:55.320] Wow. [28:55.320 --> 29:01.840] Okay, that's it, this is not going to work and I've been working for this several years [29:01.840 --> 29:08.560] and so I finally figured out, okay, he says no, I ask one, two, maybe three questions [29:08.560 --> 29:11.960] and then I go back to the same questions I'd go to before. [29:11.960 --> 29:19.840] Well I take that set of questions and I save it as a separate file because when I go back [29:19.840 --> 29:25.440] up to that other level, I'm going to a different legal issue. [29:25.440 --> 29:30.440] So I save that legal issue in a separate file. [29:30.440 --> 29:35.240] As big as that file was, there were 15 issues when I got done. [29:35.240 --> 29:40.960] 15 issues and had about four or five questions apiece in them. [29:40.960 --> 29:45.360] Frankly I was astounded. [29:45.360 --> 29:52.120] I called these issues all over the place so in the whole questionnaire, what I'm really [29:52.120 --> 29:58.640] looking at is massive duplicity. [29:58.640 --> 30:04.640] And looking at TV screens are popping up at stores across the country. [30:04.640 --> 30:08.840] They run interesting video clips and serve up tempting ads, but many are hiding a dark [30:08.840 --> 30:11.080] secret behind their harmless looking panels. [30:11.080 --> 30:15.720] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you more in just a moment. [30:15.720 --> 30:21.040] Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database [30:21.040 --> 30:22.800] of your personal information. [30:22.800 --> 30:26.120] That's creepy, but it doesn't have to be that way. [30:26.120 --> 30:29.460] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. [30:29.460 --> 30:33.360] Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking [30:33.360 --> 30:35.640] cookies and they're third party certified. [30:35.640 --> 30:40.120] If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. [30:40.120 --> 30:42.720] Great search results and total privacy. [30:42.720 --> 30:46.640] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [30:46.640 --> 30:51.000] Video displays in stores and public spaces might be watching you back. [30:51.000 --> 30:55.800] Called digital signage systems, many use hidden cameras to scope out your age and gender to [30:55.800 --> 30:58.160] deliver targeted ads and videos. [30:58.160 --> 31:02.360] A middle aged woman might see a clip promoting soy milk while a teenage boy might see an [31:02.360 --> 31:03.800] ad for a sports drink. [31:03.800 --> 31:09.000] As people come and go, the systems document customer reactions and dwell time. [31:09.000 --> 31:13.680] While companies claim they anonymize images to protect privacy, facial recognition systems [31:13.680 --> 31:17.600] could be used in the future to see exactly who's watching what. [31:17.600 --> 31:21.440] If you find this offensive, vote with your pocketbook and spend your hard earned cash [31:21.440 --> 31:23.280] at more privacy friendly stores. [31:23.280 --> 31:25.080] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [31:25.080 --> 31:27.680] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:27.680 --> 31:35.960] Did you know there are three million edible food plants on earth and none have the nutritional [31:35.960 --> 31:37.640] value of the hemp plant? [31:37.640 --> 31:40.200] HEMPUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder. [31:40.200 --> 31:46.040] It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100% gluten free. [31:46.040 --> 31:51.200] Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein, and feeds the body the [31:51.200 --> 31:52.680] nutrients it needs. [31:52.680 --> 32:03.120] Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you only at HEMPUSA.org. [32:03.120 --> 32:05.880] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [32:05.880 --> 32:09.520] In today's America, we live in an us against them society and if we the people are ever [32:09.520 --> 32:13.720] going to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.720 --> 32:16.920] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [32:16.920 --> 32:20.960] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:20.960 --> 32:24.800] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve [32:24.800 --> 32:26.200] our rights through due process. [32:26.200 --> 32:30.160] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [32:30.160 --> 32:33.940] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [32:33.940 --> 32:36.040] is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. [32:36.040 --> 32:40.360] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to RuleOfLawRadio.com and [32:40.360 --> 32:41.360] ordering your copy today. [32:41.360 --> 32:44.840] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [32:44.840 --> 32:49.400] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [32:49.400 --> 32:51.720] documents and other useful resource material. [32:51.720 --> 32:55.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from RuleOfLawRadio.com. [32:55.000 --> 33:03.360] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:03.360 --> 33:06.960] Live free speech radio, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [33:33.360 --> 33:45.920] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, we're talking to Darren in Pennsylvania. [33:45.920 --> 33:48.000] I don't know how well I'm doing with this. [33:48.000 --> 33:52.880] Oh, I was talking about how this came together. [33:52.880 --> 34:02.400] Once I pulled down each of these sections by issues, it turned out as big as this questionnaire [34:02.400 --> 34:09.640] because there was only 15 issues in the whole thing, kind of like questions. [34:09.640 --> 34:16.780] Standing back and looking at it from the outside, it looks huge and complex and interrelated, [34:16.780 --> 34:23.920] but it breaks down into just a very few issues that come together in a multitude of different [34:23.920 --> 34:26.400] ways. [34:26.400 --> 34:35.480] And the way it turns out is when I get to a legal issue, doesn't matter how I got there, [34:35.480 --> 34:41.840] all the legal issues are based on legal elements. [34:41.840 --> 34:47.680] And the law for that issue is the same no matter how you got there. [34:47.680 --> 34:57.040] So all I have to do is develop the argument for this legal issue and call that argument [34:57.040 --> 34:59.540] up every time I come to it. [34:59.540 --> 35:09.520] It turns out that this electronic lawyer is going to be embarrassingly simple for lawyers. [35:09.520 --> 35:13.680] They think what they do is an art form. [35:13.680 --> 35:21.560] It's not near so complex as they'd like to think it is. [35:21.560 --> 35:29.200] Once I get an issue addressed, it's done unless the law changes, then I go in there and make [35:29.200 --> 35:31.480] an adjustment to it. [35:31.480 --> 35:41.000] Part of the difficulty building this thing is building it so that it's expandable and [35:41.000 --> 35:47.960] so that we can adjust it and make it a living tool. [35:47.960 --> 35:52.120] But at the end of the day, once we get the pieces put together, it's not going to be [35:52.120 --> 35:57.600] near as complex as it appeared it was going to be. [35:57.600 --> 36:02.040] So I'm real excited about getting this completed. [36:02.040 --> 36:08.560] Once we have it, you'll be able to go into court and just clean their plows. [36:08.560 --> 36:16.400] The lawyer will have no advantage over a pro se, other than he's better at arguing legal [36:16.400 --> 36:17.400] issues. [36:17.400 --> 36:18.400] Right. [36:18.400 --> 36:29.200] Now, how do you think that's going to be seen by the lawyers? [36:29.200 --> 36:33.520] Do you think they're going to try to get you to take it down once you put it up or you [36:33.520 --> 36:34.520] know? [36:34.520 --> 36:37.520] No, they're going to want to buy it. [36:37.520 --> 36:39.160] That's the whole point. [36:39.160 --> 36:47.200] We'll eliminate the professional lawyer and get them to pay us to do it because, say you're [36:47.200 --> 36:51.400] asking these questions, you know, every time I talk to a lawyer, I just talked to one Wednesday [36:51.400 --> 36:54.480] to Scott's lawyer and mentioned to Frank's hearing. [36:54.480 --> 37:01.320] He had no idea what it was and I tell lawyers when I talk to them about this, I say, I do [37:01.320 --> 37:06.160] this radio show and people call in with all kind of cool stuff and then next week they [37:06.160 --> 37:07.160] call in with more stuff. [37:07.160 --> 37:11.480] I had somebody call in one day and asked me if I knew what a Frank's hearing was. [37:11.480 --> 37:15.220] And I said, well, I've heard of it, but I don't remember what it is. [37:15.220 --> 37:21.520] So after the show, I looked it up and when I saw what it was, I thought, holy mackerel, [37:21.520 --> 37:24.000] how could I ever have forgotten that? [37:24.000 --> 37:28.240] And the lawyer's standing there thinking, what the heck's a Frank's hearing? [37:28.240 --> 37:34.360] And it terrifies them because their biggest fear is missing something and he don't even [37:34.360 --> 37:35.360] know what it is. [37:35.360 --> 37:41.420] So it's a hearing for the purpose of determining the veracity of a police officer who testified [37:41.420 --> 37:43.840] before a magistrate's secure warrant. [37:43.840 --> 37:47.320] So I'll go in and look at my questionnaire and it says, were you arrested? [37:47.320 --> 37:48.320] Yes. [37:48.320 --> 37:50.960] Were you arrested on an existing warrant? [37:50.960 --> 37:51.960] Yes. [37:51.960 --> 37:56.280] Do you have reason to believe that the officer who testified before the magistrate to secure [37:56.280 --> 38:00.120] that warrant misrepresented the truth to the magistrate? [38:00.120 --> 38:04.120] If you say yes, Frank's hearing, it veers off. [38:04.120 --> 38:10.280] It pops this pop-up box up and it has all the questions it needs to develop a Frank's [38:10.280 --> 38:12.200] hearing motion. [38:12.200 --> 38:16.520] And then when you're done, you click off of it and it puts a Frank's hearing in your out [38:16.520 --> 38:18.280] box. [38:18.280 --> 38:24.880] Completed, fully hyperlinked, all done. [38:24.880 --> 38:29.480] Every issue that's implicated, you implicate a bar grievance, it writes the bar grievance. [38:29.480 --> 38:33.820] Because it's got all the information, you already put it in. [38:33.820 --> 38:41.920] Your name, address, if it's a ticket, yeah, just, you know, this is a technology we could [38:41.920 --> 38:45.400] have done 40 years ago. [38:45.400 --> 38:54.400] Listen, this doesn't depend on any current technology, it was just nobody figured it [38:54.400 --> 38:58.280] out. [38:58.280 --> 39:10.400] So once we get this done, then you come into the court and you have every legal issue that's [39:10.400 --> 39:14.400] implicated no matter how remotely. [39:14.400 --> 39:16.200] You got it. [39:16.200 --> 39:19.580] And you have fully hyperlinked documents. [39:19.580 --> 39:25.360] With these fully hyperlinked documents, the computer doesn't screw up a citation and get [39:25.360 --> 39:28.100] the wrong citation in the wrong place. [39:28.100 --> 39:34.880] It doesn't forget to change the name on the certificate of service, or it doesn't get [39:34.880 --> 39:38.920] a typo in typing in the cause number. [39:38.920 --> 39:40.760] They do any of that kind of stuff. [39:40.760 --> 39:51.820] The courts, since everybody's going to e-filing, the courts have been wanting hyperlinked documents, [39:51.820 --> 39:55.960] but they're still getting flat PDFs. [39:55.960 --> 40:04.720] So we send them along with the filing, a hyperlink in the filing, or a URL, so they can just [40:04.720 --> 40:11.520] select the URL, drop it into their browser, and it'll go to a website with these cases [40:11.520 --> 40:12.520] on it. [40:12.520 --> 40:17.020] Or if they open, we'll also include a electronic version. [40:17.020 --> 40:19.540] So they open this up. [40:19.540 --> 40:25.240] You know, have a rule, never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth. [40:25.240 --> 40:30.880] You always make proactive statements of law out of the mouth of the legislature or the [40:30.880 --> 40:31.880] courts. [40:31.880 --> 40:35.600] You never say, well, you have to do this and you're supposed to do that. [40:35.600 --> 40:37.800] No, no, no, no, no. [40:37.800 --> 40:38.800] Right. [40:38.800 --> 40:45.760] According to the legislature in statute so and so, you must do the following, and I quote [40:45.760 --> 40:47.980] the statute. [40:47.980 --> 40:55.820] So I put in, you know, whenever I reference a statute, I always say that reads as follows, [40:55.820 --> 41:02.840] stick in a colon and quote the section of statute I'm referring to. [41:02.840 --> 41:04.680] This goes to mental flow. [41:04.680 --> 41:10.160] This there's a whole section in that e-book on mental flow. [41:10.160 --> 41:17.060] Footnotes suck because you have to break your train of thought to go down to the bottom [41:17.060 --> 41:20.960] and go find this footnote. [41:20.960 --> 41:22.840] You just lost your train of thought. [41:22.840 --> 41:28.480] You're going down the document and I reference something, I quote it right there. [41:28.480 --> 41:36.480] You indent both sides half an inch, you set the spacing to one inch or one line spacing [41:36.480 --> 41:41.880] and drop the font size one font size down. [41:41.880 --> 41:48.580] So the reader can take one glance and exceed the entire quotation. [41:48.580 --> 41:52.820] If he knows what it is already and he don't have a question about it, he just scoot right [41:52.820 --> 41:53.820] over it. [41:53.820 --> 41:57.680] But if he has a question about it, he can go down through it. [41:57.680 --> 42:07.000] Every time in the quotation or anywhere in the document, a case or a statute is referenced, [42:07.000 --> 42:15.360] it's hyperlinked and where I have a quotation, if you right click on the quotation, it will [42:15.360 --> 42:23.040] pop up a pop-up box with the entire statute or the entire case in the pop-up box with [42:23.040 --> 42:33.660] that section highlighted in the document so you can see how this portion quoted fits within [42:33.660 --> 42:37.620] the context of the overall document. [42:37.620 --> 42:44.680] So the judge can get all these questions asked about the veracity of my case laws, about [42:44.680 --> 42:51.000] the correctness of the case law and statutes that I've presented without ever having to [42:51.000 --> 42:54.380] break mental flow. [42:54.380 --> 42:59.760] I put a heading on every paragraph. [42:59.760 --> 43:05.080] If I can't put a heading on the next paragraph, I haven't written it right. [43:05.080 --> 43:09.240] I need to go back and rewrite it. [43:09.240 --> 43:15.600] And this access direction to the reader while he's going through the document, he always [43:15.600 --> 43:19.000] knows what to expect in this next paragraph. [43:19.000 --> 43:20.000] He's never surprised. [43:20.000 --> 43:24.420] He never has to stop and figure out what it is because I've just told him what I'm going [43:24.420 --> 43:27.320] to tell him and then I tell him. [43:27.320 --> 43:32.920] So I have a whole method and these will be produced that way. [43:32.920 --> 43:41.120] Once we've done a few of them, pro se go into court and give the judge's documents fully [43:41.120 --> 43:47.000] hyperlinked with all of this interactivity in it and the other lawyer comes in with a [43:47.000 --> 43:48.000] flat PDF. [43:48.000 --> 43:54.560] He's going to look at this lawyer and say, Bubba, what is your problem? [43:54.560 --> 43:59.640] Here, a pro se comes in and wipes the floor with you. [43:59.640 --> 44:08.000] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com and I would like to invite you to come by [44:08.000 --> 44:13.400] our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas behind Brave New Books [44:13.400 --> 44:18.280] and Chase Bank to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [44:18.280 --> 44:22.680] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [44:22.680 --> 44:26.760] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Emu oil, [44:26.760 --> 44:30.400] lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [44:30.400 --> 44:43.080] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com, that's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [44:43.080 --> 45:01.360] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com. [45:01.360 --> 45:04.560] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:04.560 --> 45:09.800] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand [45:09.800 --> 45:15.040] four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [45:15.040 --> 45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.320] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.320 --> 45:28.160] Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too. [45:28.160 --> 45:34.720] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience. [45:34.720 --> 45:39.480] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [45:39.480 --> 45:43.760] principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.760 --> 45:49.960] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.960 --> 45:52.560] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.560 --> 46:10.160] Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EASY. [46:22.560 --> 46:40.680] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Darren in Pennsylvania. [46:40.680 --> 46:45.160] Darren, does it sound like something that'll work? [46:45.160 --> 46:46.160] Yes. [46:46.160 --> 46:50.840] I do appreciate your time, Randy, you're doing a great job on the radio show. [46:50.840 --> 46:53.480] I just wish more people were aware of it. [46:53.480 --> 46:58.760] I'll do my best to help share and promote your show with people that I know that are [46:58.760 --> 47:03.080] having the battles and I want to get off here and wish you a happy Easter and hopefully [47:03.080 --> 47:09.480] everything goes good for you and keep with your work and you know, I love it. [47:09.480 --> 47:11.800] I'm going to listen to a lot more. [47:11.800 --> 47:13.760] Okay, thank you, Darren. [47:13.760 --> 47:28.760] Now we're going to go to Rader in Oregon, yo Bubba, can't hear you, do you have a problem [47:28.760 --> 47:35.320] with your mic or something or did I put you to sleep? [47:35.320 --> 47:41.080] Okay, we will come back to you, you must have a problem with your equipment or it may just [47:41.080 --> 47:47.280] be a bad call, if you can't get through, try hanging up and calling again. [47:47.280 --> 47:51.560] We're going to go to Brett in Texas, hello Brett. [47:51.560 --> 47:53.800] Hello there, Randy. [47:53.800 --> 47:58.520] Well, I have a couple of questions. [47:58.520 --> 48:04.800] You mentioned a little earlier about asking somebody to rule on motions with no oral argument [48:04.800 --> 48:10.680] and that sounds very intriguing to me right now because one of these little log pimple [48:10.680 --> 48:19.720] places is I'm concerned about ambush physically, you know, a very corrupt little crew of cronies [48:19.720 --> 48:27.040] and the one guy that tried to sexually assault, just they're messed up and I'm concerned that [48:27.040 --> 48:40.200] they would not have the integrity to just let me come to court and go away unmolested [48:40.200 --> 48:48.920] and that idea of no oral argument, that sounds a lot safer to me but I don't know how to [48:48.920 --> 48:50.080] make that happen. [48:50.080 --> 48:57.200] Oh, we just, we prepare a motion to that effect. [48:57.200 --> 49:06.760] It may not keep you out of court but if you have been subjected to something of this nature [49:06.760 --> 49:13.560] and you object to come into the court because of that, this is good grounds for change of [49:13.560 --> 49:14.560] venue. [49:14.560 --> 49:15.560] Okay. [49:15.560 --> 49:24.640] If you notice the court, you're afraid to come into the county because you've been attacked [49:24.640 --> 49:31.920] and threatened by officials in the county and you've taken action to seek remedy and [49:31.920 --> 49:37.800] the county has shielded them from prosecution, you move for a change of venue. [49:37.800 --> 49:42.880] Change of venue, all right. [49:42.880 --> 49:44.920] That would jerk a knot in their shorts. [49:44.920 --> 49:49.280] Why, then they don't get the money they would have otherwise or what? [49:49.280 --> 49:54.160] Well, yeah, they would but they don't get to jerk you around. [49:54.160 --> 50:00.280] You go to another court that they don't have any, they don't have a dog in the hunt so [50:00.280 --> 50:08.200] they won't make any money if you lose the case and they're not going to want you causing [50:08.200 --> 50:15.080] them the problem that you cause these guys so they're more likely to give you a good [50:15.080 --> 50:16.080] ruling. [50:16.080 --> 50:17.080] Okay. [50:17.080 --> 50:21.520] Well, my other question for you was about how to find the right district judge and I [50:21.520 --> 50:28.600] don't know, maybe these two actually go together because if I'm going to move to change venue [50:28.600 --> 50:34.120] and maybe it matters which district judge is, would it be good to stir up politics and [50:34.120 --> 50:39.680] try to get them in the same district where the judge, you know, whenever they go back [50:39.680 --> 50:47.800] home to their own venue, they're still having to face the music with the same district judge [50:47.800 --> 50:51.880] or is it better to get them outside of their district? [50:51.880 --> 50:55.080] I don't know, but I would like to know how to find out who the district judge is for [50:55.080 --> 50:56.920] any little potential replacements. [50:56.920 --> 50:59.920] Oh, you can look that up on the internet. [50:59.920 --> 51:03.640] Do you know the number of the judicial district? [51:03.640 --> 51:04.920] No. [51:04.920 --> 51:08.680] Then you just do a search for a county. [51:08.680 --> 51:13.280] But then when you look for the name of a town, I know how to get from there to a county, [51:13.280 --> 51:17.840] but I don't know how to get from there to any of these kind of district or judicial [51:17.840 --> 51:19.120] or anything. [51:19.120 --> 51:24.520] Just do district court for county. [51:24.520 --> 51:28.840] You'll get a hit on a website for the district court for that county. [51:28.840 --> 51:29.840] Okay. [51:29.840 --> 51:34.840] Well, unless it's, you know, Dallas or Fort Worth where they got a whole bunch of district [51:34.840 --> 51:42.120] courts, but out in the boondocks in the smaller counties, like where I'm at, our district [51:42.120 --> 51:49.420] judge is the judge for three counties, Wise, Montague, and Jack. [51:49.420 --> 51:53.320] And in a lot of the smaller counties, they do it that way. [51:53.320 --> 51:56.960] So then in your case out there, there would just be the one. [51:56.960 --> 51:57.960] Right. [51:57.960 --> 51:58.960] Okay. [51:58.960 --> 52:05.120] Well, what do you think, is there any benefit in trying to move venue to somewhere else [52:05.120 --> 52:07.200] that's within their district? [52:07.200 --> 52:09.060] Oh, absolutely. [52:09.060 --> 52:18.760] If you file a motion alleging that you're afraid to come to the court because of the [52:18.760 --> 52:26.200] physical abuse and threats by officers of the court, oh, that's going to look real ugly [52:26.200 --> 52:27.200] for the court. [52:27.200 --> 52:30.360] Well, good, because it's true. [52:30.360 --> 52:37.680] And find the district judge and petition for a court of inquiry. [52:37.680 --> 52:39.080] Court of inquiry? [52:39.080 --> 52:40.080] Yes. [52:40.080 --> 52:49.420] The Chapter 51 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a court of inquiry was designed for specifically [52:49.420 --> 52:52.200] this purpose. [52:52.200 --> 53:01.480] It's like an examining trial, but it's for the purpose of examining into improprieties. [53:01.480 --> 53:06.820] It doesn't say public officials, but it's clearly for that purpose. [53:06.820 --> 53:19.520] So rather than go to a magistrate in the county, if this is a part of a widespread corruption, [53:19.520 --> 53:24.720] then that's not a reasonable remedy. [53:24.720 --> 53:27.240] So in Texas, we have a court of inquiry. [53:27.240 --> 53:34.240] You go to the district judge in the county where the problem occurred. [53:34.240 --> 53:42.560] And that district judge must request a, when he petitions for a court of inquiry, he must [53:42.560 --> 53:45.800] do it to a different district judge. [53:45.800 --> 53:48.240] He can't hear the court of inquiry. [53:48.240 --> 53:49.240] Another one would. [53:49.240 --> 53:54.960] So that would move it out of that county to another county, have exactly the effects you [53:54.960 --> 53:55.960] wanna have. [53:55.960 --> 54:04.580] And then you got an outside district judge looking into the county, overseeing the public [54:04.580 --> 54:06.120] officials in this county. [54:06.120 --> 54:11.400] That's kind of the best of both worlds, isn't it, politically wise? [54:11.400 --> 54:12.400] Yeah. [54:12.400 --> 54:16.180] The problem is getting judges to do it. [54:16.180 --> 54:24.240] So you file with criminal complaints with the district judge and ask the district judge [54:24.240 --> 54:32.760] to hold an examining trial in his capacity as a magistrate or in the alternative. [54:32.760 --> 54:44.320] Petition another district judge to convene a, lost the word, a court of inquiry. [54:44.320 --> 54:45.920] That'll jerk a knot in his shorts. [54:45.920 --> 54:49.840] Now you've put the district judge on the dime. [54:49.840 --> 54:55.240] And the district judge is not gonna like being put on the dime because of a justice of the [54:55.240 --> 54:59.640] peace or municipal judge. [54:59.640 --> 55:01.760] He's gonna be real unhappy. [55:01.760 --> 55:09.480] JPs and municipal judges are afraid of this district judge and they should be. [55:09.480 --> 55:13.880] So this is a good way of getting it out of their hands and just making it bigger for [55:13.880 --> 55:14.880] them. [55:14.880 --> 55:22.620] This is what private citizens can do that other public officials can't do. [55:22.620 --> 55:28.060] So we need to, I've got a timeline from you. [55:28.060 --> 55:37.520] We need to go through that timeline and put together a set of criminal complaints against [55:37.520 --> 55:39.440] these officers for whatever occurred. [55:39.440 --> 55:47.160] We'll get a whole set of criminal complaints designed for a court of inquiry. [55:47.160 --> 55:53.000] We want to show that there is widespread corruption. [55:53.000 --> 55:57.280] That this is not just one officer with an attitude. [55:57.280 --> 56:04.360] This is a officer or a group of officers who feel like they are absolutely immune from [56:04.360 --> 56:07.360] legal remedy. [56:07.360 --> 56:13.560] And they're immune from legal remedy because those officials in place to provide that remedy [56:13.560 --> 56:15.640] are acting in concert and collusion. [56:15.640 --> 56:19.940] So we want to try to tie them all together. [56:19.940 --> 56:22.700] And it just needs to look ugly. [56:22.700 --> 56:30.960] Because when they don't, then we can always come to Travis County and ask a Travis County [56:30.960 --> 56:38.240] district attorney, a district judge to petition for a court of inquiry. [56:38.240 --> 56:40.360] Travis County is the seat of government. [56:40.360 --> 56:44.600] So they're going to be calling down to these other counties wanting to know what's going [56:44.600 --> 56:45.600] on. [56:45.600 --> 56:50.560] And if these guys are not following law, the last thing they want is somebody looking at [56:50.560 --> 56:54.440] them. [56:54.440 --> 56:57.200] This is the politics side. [56:57.200 --> 57:01.280] We want to create as much politics as we can. [57:01.280 --> 57:04.760] And in your case, you've got a lot of politics to create. [57:04.760 --> 57:16.160] If I am correct in this, they cited you for driving on an expired out-of-state plate. [57:16.160 --> 57:18.160] They got a problem. [57:18.160 --> 57:20.320] Now we come after them because that's criminal. [57:20.320 --> 57:28.240] It can't be construed that the officer who issued the citation was somehow unaware that [57:28.240 --> 57:37.440] he had no subject matter jurisdiction over a violation from another state. [57:37.440 --> 57:42.900] That means you sue the officer personally. [57:42.900 --> 57:47.360] And when you get before the judge, you sue the judge personally, and that's when they're [57:47.360 --> 57:50.280] going to get real excited. [57:50.280 --> 57:52.240] And we talked about this early in the show. [57:52.240 --> 57:55.640] We need to start suing these judges. [57:55.640 --> 58:01.960] And in traffic, we've got the pleadings put together that show there is no subject matter [58:01.960 --> 58:04.040] jurisdiction. [58:04.040 --> 58:06.680] And that opens the door to sue the judge personally. [58:06.680 --> 58:13.680] When we start getting suits filed against judges all over Texas, we're going to have [58:13.680 --> 58:16.380] some changes. [58:16.380 --> 58:19.840] One thing I know is these judges all talk to each other and tell them about the problems [58:19.840 --> 58:20.960] they have. [58:20.960 --> 58:24.120] This will get all over Texas really fast. [58:24.120 --> 58:25.120] Hang on. [58:25.120 --> 58:26.120] About to go to break. [58:26.120 --> 58:33.520] Randy Kelton, Rule Law Radio, I call in number 512-646-1984, we've got two callers and one [58:33.520 --> 58:34.520] hour left. [58:34.520 --> 58:39.560] So if you have a question or comment and you want to get it in, call in quickly so I'll [58:39.560 --> 58:43.160] know how to gauge my time so I make sure I get to everybody. [58:43.160 --> 59:12.880] We'll be right back. [59:13.480 --> 59:18.740] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:18.740 --> 59:23.000] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan [59:23.000 --> 59:27.940] of salvation, growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church. [59:27.940 --> 59:32.960] To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian [59:32.960 --> 59:45.720] Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102, that's 888-551-0102, or visit [59:45.720 --> 01:00:00.800] us online at bfa.org. [01:00:00.800 --> 01:00:05.640] And following these flashes brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown. [01:00:05.640 --> 01:00:12.000] Markets for Friday, the 14th of April, 2017, are currently trading with gold at $1,284.01 [01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:19.780] an ounce, silver $18.51 an ounce, Texas crude $53.18 a barrel, and Bitcoin is sitting at [01:00:19.780 --> 01:00:25.440] about 1,175 U.S. currency. [01:00:25.440 --> 01:00:31.080] In history, the year 1865, U.S. President Abraham Lincoln is shot at Ford's Theater [01:00:31.080 --> 01:00:33.080] by John Wilkes Booth. [01:00:33.080 --> 01:00:39.720] Lincoln later died the next day after being shot, today, in history. [01:00:39.720 --> 01:00:46.760] In recent news, the GBU-43B Massive Ordnance Air Blast Bomb, or Mother of All Bombs, the [01:00:46.760 --> 01:00:52.640] largest non-nuclear bomb in the United States arsenal with a blast yield of 11 tons of TNT, [01:00:52.640 --> 01:00:56.960] was dropped for the first time in combat Thursday night on a network of fortified underground [01:00:56.960 --> 01:01:01.680] tunnels, originally built by the CIA, according to WikiLeaks, that ISIS and the Taliban had [01:01:01.680 --> 01:01:05.600] been using to stage attacks on U.S. and Afghani forces. [01:01:05.600 --> 01:01:10.580] The strike took place in the Nangarhar province near the Afghan and Pakistan border, with [01:01:10.580 --> 01:01:14.000] Afghan officials confirming 36 ISIS fighters killed. [01:01:14.000 --> 01:01:18.920] However, ISIS media wing the Amak News Agency denied that any ISIS fighters were killed [01:01:18.920 --> 01:01:20.320] or injured. [01:01:20.320 --> 01:01:24.240] General John Nicholson, commander of the U.S. forces in Afghanistan, defending the use of [01:01:24.240 --> 01:01:28.940] the Moab, told a press conference that, quote, this was the right weapon against the right [01:01:28.940 --> 01:01:29.940] target. [01:01:29.940 --> 01:01:33.240] It was the right time to use it tactically against the right target on the battlefield. [01:01:33.240 --> 01:01:40.040] That's the 21,600-pound, $170,000 Mother of All Bombs Afghan President Ashraf Ghani approved [01:01:40.040 --> 01:01:44.780] of the strike, while former President Hamid Karzai accused the United States of using [01:01:44.780 --> 01:01:48.880] Afghanistan as a, quote, testing ground for a new and dangerous weapon. [01:01:48.880 --> 01:01:52.320] Residents two to three kilometers away were reporting broken windows and thick clouds [01:01:52.320 --> 01:01:54.560] of smoke after the blast. [01:01:54.560 --> 01:01:59.040] During the final stages of testing in 2003, military officials told the media that the [01:01:59.040 --> 01:02:04.120] Moab was mainly conceived as a weapon employed for psychological operations, that it is a [01:02:04.120 --> 01:02:09.480] means of scaring enemies into not even fighting. [01:02:09.480 --> 01:02:13.960] An internal Delta Airlines memo obtained Friday by the Associated Press stated that its agents [01:02:13.960 --> 01:02:19.360] can offer up to $2,000, up from a previous maximum of $800, and supervisors can offer [01:02:19.360 --> 01:02:26.140] up to $9,950, up from $1,350, to customers willing to give up their seats, with other [01:02:26.140 --> 01:02:30.360] airlines examining their policies as well, and American Airlines updating its rules to [01:02:30.360 --> 01:02:34.680] say that no passengers who have boarded the plane will be removed to give up the seat [01:02:34.680 --> 01:02:35.820] to someone else. [01:02:35.820 --> 01:02:40.200] All this in response to a viral video where airport officers violently yanked and dragged [01:02:40.200 --> 01:02:45.840] David Dowell from his seat on a sold-out United Express flight, a choice which cost United [01:02:45.840 --> 01:02:48.420] upwards of a quarter of a billion dollars. [01:02:48.420 --> 01:02:55.480] No wonder airline competitors are paying out nearly 10 grand to avoid such a scenario. [01:02:55.480 --> 01:03:20.000] This was Rick Brody with your Lowdown for April 14, 2017. [01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:21.000] We are back. [01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:26.080] Randy Kelton, the rule of law radio, and we're talking to Brett in Texas. [01:03:26.080 --> 01:03:33.520] Okay, Brett, I think that would make a good strategy. [01:03:33.520 --> 01:03:34.520] Anything that'll- [01:03:34.520 --> 01:03:36.080] I've got something you just said here. [01:03:36.080 --> 01:03:37.600] I'm trying to take notes here. [01:03:37.600 --> 01:03:39.080] Let me see if I've got what you said. [01:03:39.080 --> 01:03:45.400] I'm going to find the district judge that goes with that county. [01:03:45.400 --> 01:03:47.800] It's a per-county thing, right? [01:03:47.800 --> 01:03:48.800] Yes. [01:03:48.800 --> 01:03:57.080] Well, no, no, district judges are not necessarily per-county, but when you're out of the major [01:03:57.080 --> 01:04:04.120] metropolitan areas, they generally are, because a judge will have more than one county. [01:04:04.120 --> 01:04:11.220] In Dallas, Fort Worth, Austin, San Antone, you have a bunch of district judges. [01:04:11.220 --> 01:04:21.320] So their venue will be generally restricted to one county, but you can't just look for [01:04:21.320 --> 01:04:26.120] that county district judge, because there could be a whole bunch of them. [01:04:26.120 --> 01:04:27.120] Okay. [01:04:27.120 --> 01:04:31.280] Well, during the break, I was looking for a district judge. [01:04:31.280 --> 01:04:35.920] I actually came up with two different ones, and I'm not sure which way to go with that, [01:04:35.920 --> 01:04:38.720] but I'm going to find the district judge. [01:04:38.720 --> 01:04:43.280] I'm not going to send this motion to do the oral argument. [01:04:43.280 --> 01:04:49.360] I'm not going to send that to the little city of Waug Temple, but I'm going to instead send [01:04:49.360 --> 01:04:59.440] all my motions to the district judge and petition for a court of inquiry, citing that I'm afraid [01:04:59.440 --> 01:05:04.080] to show up at this little court because of all these reasons. [01:05:04.080 --> 01:05:08.200] And I'm going to mention chapter 51 of something, I forget, I don't remember what you said. [01:05:08.200 --> 01:05:09.200] Chapter 52? [01:05:09.200 --> 01:05:17.320] I'm sorry, chapter 52, I'm sorry, I said 51, it's 52, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:05:17.320 --> 01:05:19.160] Okay. [01:05:19.160 --> 01:05:27.040] And that's a good one because I have, the first instance I come across one of those [01:05:27.040 --> 01:05:35.720] was out of El Paso, and the judge in his ruling said he had never heard of one of these. [01:05:35.720 --> 01:05:43.560] And at the monthly meeting of judges, he brought it up and none of them had ever heard of it. [01:05:43.560 --> 01:05:53.600] So it's little used, and the judge is not going to know what to do with it. [01:05:53.600 --> 01:05:59.800] He's going to want to just toss it, but since it's not something they're familiar with, [01:05:59.800 --> 01:06:04.300] he's not going to really understand the ramifications. [01:06:04.300 --> 01:06:09.760] So it will get the judge's interest in any case. [01:06:09.760 --> 01:06:10.760] All right. [01:06:10.760 --> 01:06:19.000] So I'm going to explicitly invoke his capacity as a magistrate and ask him to hold an examining [01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:26.080] trial, or in the alternative, there was something else that you wanted me to ask him to do. [01:06:26.080 --> 01:06:28.080] The court of inquiry. [01:06:28.080 --> 01:06:34.280] Oh, so I would ask for the examining trial would be the primary request, and secondarily, [01:06:34.280 --> 01:06:36.000] he could do the court of inquiry. [01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:37.000] Yes. [01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:41.800] A court of inquiry is similar to an examining trial. [01:06:41.800 --> 01:06:48.760] The court of inquiry inquires into a set of circumstances, just like a magistrate does. [01:06:48.760 --> 01:06:58.040] So essentially what a court of inquiry amounts to is you get a judge from outside the district [01:06:58.040 --> 01:07:03.560] to come and look inside a foreign district. [01:07:03.560 --> 01:07:12.960] Anyone who doesn't have a dog in this particular hunt, that could be a lot of fun. [01:07:12.960 --> 01:07:19.080] Believe it to me to find the fun. [01:07:19.080 --> 01:07:24.760] Oh, well, you got a citation for out-of-state plates. [01:07:24.760 --> 01:07:30.000] They got a problem, and then you have a sulk on you by the officer. [01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:33.280] That's a really, really serious business. [01:07:33.280 --> 01:07:34.280] You gotta admit. [01:07:34.280 --> 01:07:38.960] I had no insurance at the time, and I did have insurance at the time. [01:07:38.960 --> 01:07:39.960] And you know what? [01:07:39.960 --> 01:07:46.520] I just found out by reading last night that the officer is required now that they've come [01:07:46.520 --> 01:07:54.280] up with this online verification system, and the officer, all officers have access to it. [01:07:54.280 --> 01:08:07.400] And the law says that if 601.453, it says that if the officer has access to it, then [01:08:07.400 --> 01:08:17.320] he is not allowed to issue a citation for lack of insurance until he checks with that [01:08:17.320 --> 01:08:18.320] system. [01:08:18.320 --> 01:08:27.480] The last speeding ticket I got was in Azel, Texas, and if he asked me if I had insurance, [01:08:27.480 --> 01:08:28.800] I said, of course I have insurance. [01:08:28.800 --> 01:08:29.800] Do you have proof of insurance? [01:08:29.800 --> 01:08:32.120] Yeah, but I'm not gonna show it to you. [01:08:32.120 --> 01:08:34.200] Go look it up in your computer. [01:08:34.200 --> 01:08:35.640] He said, well, I don't do that. [01:08:35.640 --> 01:08:40.120] Well, go do that. [01:08:40.120 --> 01:08:44.560] He didn't write for insurance. [01:08:44.560 --> 01:08:48.600] But I told him, look, you go ahead and write the ticket. [01:08:48.600 --> 01:08:54.580] I'll get a jury trial, and when he said, well, if you have insurance, you can bring down [01:08:54.580 --> 01:08:56.680] proof of insurance and they'll dismiss. [01:08:56.680 --> 01:08:58.680] So hey, okay, I'm not gonna do that. [01:08:58.680 --> 01:09:00.220] I want a jury trial. [01:09:00.220 --> 01:09:06.160] Once we get the jury and paneled, I'll show my proof of insurance to the jury. [01:09:06.160 --> 01:09:12.760] He didn't write it, you jerk. [01:09:12.760 --> 01:09:14.920] I had done that in court once. [01:09:14.920 --> 01:09:16.400] The judge knew me real well. [01:09:16.400 --> 01:09:17.400] I came in. [01:09:17.400 --> 01:09:19.200] Well, everybody in the office knew me. [01:09:19.200 --> 01:09:21.200] I come in, hello, Mr. Carlton. [01:09:21.200 --> 01:09:23.360] I said, hello, Shirley. [01:09:23.360 --> 01:09:24.360] She was the clerk. [01:09:24.360 --> 01:09:26.520] Well, what are you here for today? [01:09:26.520 --> 01:09:30.600] That copper wrote me a ticket for no insurance. [01:09:30.600 --> 01:09:32.080] She said, well, did you have insurance? [01:09:32.080 --> 01:09:33.560] Of course I did. [01:09:33.560 --> 01:09:38.760] Well, if you'll just show us proof of insurance and pay us 10 bucks, the world is missed. [01:09:38.760 --> 01:09:41.880] Well, I ain't paying you 10 bucks. [01:09:41.880 --> 01:09:43.440] Well, you have to. [01:09:43.440 --> 01:09:44.440] We can't dismiss it. [01:09:44.440 --> 01:09:45.440] That's no problem. [01:09:45.440 --> 01:09:47.000] I want a jury trial. [01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:50.440] Oh, Mr. Kelton, let me call the judge. [01:09:50.440 --> 01:09:53.460] He calls out Mary. [01:09:53.460 --> 01:09:55.400] She tells her what I'm gonna do. [01:09:55.400 --> 01:09:59.200] Mr. Kelton, are you really gonna wait to show that to a jury? [01:09:59.200 --> 01:10:01.000] Yeah, that'd be great fun. [01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:03.360] Here, give me that. [01:10:03.360 --> 01:10:04.360] Dismissed. [01:10:04.360 --> 01:10:10.680] Get out of here. [01:10:10.680 --> 01:10:19.160] The speeding ticket I got in ASIL, I filed a subject matter jurisdiction challenge and [01:10:19.160 --> 01:10:24.640] I told the prosecutor, you know, I forgot what he asked me, he said we had a jury here. [01:10:24.640 --> 01:10:27.240] I said, that's okay, you're not gonna get to that jury. [01:10:27.240 --> 01:10:30.040] I have a challenge subject matter jurisdiction in the court. [01:10:30.040 --> 01:10:32.280] You guys aren't gonna get past that. [01:10:32.280 --> 01:10:33.280] What? [01:10:33.280 --> 01:10:34.360] He hadn't seen it. [01:10:34.360 --> 01:10:36.080] He gets it and reads it. [01:10:36.080 --> 01:10:44.180] They call me up, they're calling cases and they call my case and he said, is the prosecutor [01:10:44.180 --> 01:10:45.180] ready for trial? [01:10:45.180 --> 01:10:49.320] No, your honor, the prosecution is not ready for trial. [01:10:49.320 --> 01:10:51.000] Case dismissed and I jump up. [01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:54.620] I object, I object. [01:10:54.620 --> 01:10:58.240] This is the judge when they call me in initially. [01:10:58.240 --> 01:11:07.320] I walked up to the podium, to the desk there and I said, Judge Hadman, I seem to remember [01:11:07.320 --> 01:11:13.000] a Judge Hadman in ASIL, but I don't remember him having quite that much gray hair. [01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:19.560] And the judge looked at me and said, yes, Mr. Kelton, and I don't remember your belly [01:11:19.560 --> 01:11:25.360] being quite that big, touche. [01:11:25.360 --> 01:11:30.520] And he was really a genuinely a nice guy. [01:11:30.520 --> 01:11:36.920] I'd seen him in court, so I knew I could get away with that, but I objected to him dismissing. [01:11:36.920 --> 01:11:39.240] You can't object to him dismissing, of course I can. [01:11:39.240 --> 01:11:41.880] I said, we're just about to get to the good part. [01:11:41.880 --> 01:11:47.520] Get out of my court. [01:11:47.520 --> 01:11:53.200] The first time you fight them, they will fight you tooth and nail. [01:11:53.200 --> 01:11:59.420] The second time, they don't want anything to do with you. [01:11:59.420 --> 01:12:00.800] Just kind of the way it works. [01:12:00.800 --> 01:12:03.680] So be prepared if you get a ticket and you fight it. [01:12:03.680 --> 01:12:06.600] Be prepared for the other side to fight like crazy. [01:12:06.600 --> 01:12:13.080] So we come up with all these dirty tricks. [01:12:13.080 --> 01:12:16.000] If you call to court, you have to go to court. [01:12:16.000 --> 01:12:17.000] Let me know. [01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:22.640] We'll get Scott Richardson and we'll get several people there. [01:12:22.640 --> 01:12:28.560] Make it harder for them and you don't go anywhere private. [01:12:28.560 --> 01:12:33.080] If they try to take you anywhere private, then it's going to get real ugly because I'm [01:12:33.080 --> 01:12:43.000] going to be calling 911 and the FBI just making a nuisance of myself and screaming out, they're [01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:44.000] going to kill him. [01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:46.140] They're going to murder him. [01:12:46.140 --> 01:12:53.340] Get those guns away from those animals. [01:12:53.340 --> 01:13:00.080] When you start calling 911 on the police, the 911 tape is retained. [01:13:00.080 --> 01:13:02.560] They can't erase that one. [01:13:02.560 --> 01:13:06.560] That gets real ugly if they mess with the 911 tape. [01:13:06.560 --> 01:13:11.020] And then they have to send an officer out to answer the 911 call. [01:13:11.020 --> 01:13:14.760] And that really puts that officer on the dime. [01:13:14.760 --> 01:13:18.280] So it tends to make them get real careful. [01:13:18.280 --> 01:13:24.000] Is it the same kind of situation with the dash cam, body cam stuff? [01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:27.840] They can't get rid of it or can they just do it? [01:13:27.840 --> 01:13:28.840] They try to. [01:13:28.840 --> 01:13:38.440] We have one now that we have the dash cam, but there is a set of words the defendant [01:13:38.440 --> 01:13:45.960] said that's been cut from the audio, audio and video. [01:13:45.960 --> 01:13:58.880] So now, Ken and I, Ken Magnussen, we're requesting the manufacturer of the video equipment, the [01:13:58.880 --> 01:14:06.440] software used to collect and copy the video equipment. [01:14:06.440 --> 01:14:13.400] We're making requests that let them know we intend to master what we have already. [01:14:13.400 --> 01:14:17.640] And Ken is sending it to me, I'm going to break it open and master it. [01:14:17.640 --> 01:14:24.760] They've cut off the date stamps on it so it's not keeping a date on it. [01:14:24.760 --> 01:14:27.840] But generally these guys are sloppy. [01:14:27.840 --> 01:14:33.480] And if I open this thing in like Audacity 2 or something similar to that where I can [01:14:33.480 --> 01:14:41.580] actually see the waveform, if they haven't been real careful cutting it, I can see where [01:14:41.580 --> 01:14:44.800] they cut it. [01:14:44.800 --> 01:14:53.200] You always have a large waveform when there's sound and then there's a breath. [01:14:53.200 --> 01:14:58.440] You know, I do, in doing radio, one of the things you do, most people probably don't [01:14:58.440 --> 01:14:59.920] notice this. [01:14:59.920 --> 01:15:07.440] But if I make a foo-pah, an error, then I try to stop for half a second and then start [01:15:07.440 --> 01:15:08.440] again. [01:15:08.440 --> 01:15:13.880] Because in mastering, that leaves a flat line and the only thing you see in the flat line [01:15:13.880 --> 01:15:16.200] is the background noise. [01:15:16.200 --> 01:15:21.400] So I can cut that flat line and cut out a whole section where I made the mistake. [01:15:21.400 --> 01:15:26.380] What you try to do if you make a mistake is you stop just half a second and then you say [01:15:26.380 --> 01:15:29.400] what you were going to say again correctly. [01:15:29.400 --> 01:15:34.240] That way if it's mastered, they can go and cut between breaths, they can cut that first [01:15:34.240 --> 01:15:40.600] part out, bring it back together and you can't tell it was missing. [01:15:40.600 --> 01:15:46.780] So what I do now is I look at the breath marks in between. [01:15:46.780 --> 01:15:52.760] The one thing that's real hard to do is you have an up-down line there is to cut that [01:15:52.760 --> 01:15:58.160] thing exactly so the two pieces of line will fit exactly together. [01:15:58.160 --> 01:16:04.800] If I find an offset, they've got some explaining to do. [01:16:04.800 --> 01:16:08.720] If there's an offset in there, I'll find it. [01:16:08.720 --> 01:16:12.360] So we want to put in information requests that tell them that we're going to master [01:16:12.360 --> 01:16:15.440] what we have. [01:16:15.440 --> 01:16:18.440] They've already sent it to us so now they have a problem. [01:16:18.440 --> 01:16:19.440] Anyway, okay. [01:16:19.440 --> 01:16:25.520] They can't complain if there's anything wrong with the evidence because they gave it to [01:16:25.520 --> 01:16:26.520] you. [01:16:26.520 --> 01:16:27.520] Exactly. [01:16:27.520 --> 01:16:33.720] They can't get it back now because we already got it and now they know that this guy has [01:16:33.720 --> 01:16:39.880] someone who knows what's going on. [01:16:39.880 --> 01:16:40.880] Okay hang on. [01:16:40.880 --> 01:16:41.880] About to go to break. [01:16:41.880 --> 01:17:00.280] I'm Randy Kelton with La Radio, I call in number 512646 1984, we'll be right back. [01:17:00.280 --> 01:17:01.360] I love logos. [01:17:01.360 --> 01:17:04.560] Without the shows on this network, I'd be almost as ignorant as my friends. [01:17:04.560 --> 01:17:07.440] I'm so addicted to the truth now that there's no going back. [01:17:07.440 --> 01:17:08.440] I need my truth fix. [01:17:08.440 --> 01:17:13.240] I'd be lost without logos and I really want to help keep this network on the air. [01:17:13.240 --> 01:17:17.120] I'd love to volunteer as a show producer but I'm a bit of a luddite and I really don't [01:17:17.120 --> 01:17:20.480] have any money to give because I spent it all on supplements. [01:17:20.480 --> 01:17:22.320] How can I help logos? [01:17:22.320 --> 01:17:24.040] Well I'm glad you asked. [01:17:24.040 --> 01:17:26.920] Whenever you order anything from Amazon, you can help logos. [01:17:26.920 --> 01:17:29.400] You can order new supplies or holiday gifts. [01:17:29.400 --> 01:17:31.480] First thing you do is clear your cookies. [01:17:31.480 --> 01:17:37.880] Now go to logosradionetwork.com, click on the Amazon logo and bookmark it. [01:17:37.880 --> 01:17:43.520] Now when you order anything from Amazon, you use that link and logos gets a few pesos. [01:17:43.520 --> 01:17:44.520] Do I pay extra? [01:17:44.520 --> 01:17:45.520] No. [01:17:45.520 --> 01:17:47.200] Do I have to do anything different when I order? [01:17:47.200 --> 01:17:48.200] No. [01:17:48.200 --> 01:17:49.200] Can I use my Amazon Prime? [01:17:49.200 --> 01:17:50.200] No. [01:17:50.200 --> 01:17:51.200] I mean yes. [01:17:51.200 --> 01:17:55.960] Wow, giving without doing anything or spending any money, this is perfect. [01:17:55.960 --> 01:17:56.960] Thank you so much. [01:17:56.960 --> 01:17:57.960] You're welcome. [01:17:57.960 --> 01:17:59.960] Happy Holidays Logos. [01:17:59.960 --> 01:18:05.200] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination [01:18:05.200 --> 01:18:09.240] by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [01:18:09.240 --> 01:18:13.480] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality [01:18:13.480 --> 01:18:15.080] coins and precious metals. [01:18:15.080 --> 01:18:18.840] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [01:18:18.840 --> 01:18:23.660] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers [01:18:23.660 --> 01:18:24.660] and journalists. [01:18:24.660 --> 01:18:27.640] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [01:18:27.640 --> 01:18:31.880] In addition, we carry popular young jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and [01:18:31.880 --> 01:18:32.880] Pollenburst. [01:18:32.880 --> 01:18:37.760] We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, Ammunition [01:18:37.760 --> 01:18:39.920] at 10% above wholesale and more. [01:18:39.920 --> 01:18:43.880] We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment. [01:18:43.880 --> 01:18:46.880] Call us at 512-646-6440. [01:18:46.880 --> 01:18:51.840] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [01:18:51.840 --> 01:18:55.000] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. [01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:14.000] Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-6440. [01:19:25.000 --> 01:19:29.980] Okay. [01:19:29.980 --> 01:19:30.980] We are back. [01:19:30.980 --> 01:19:35.600] Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Brett in Texas. [01:19:35.600 --> 01:19:39.760] Okay, Brett, what else do you have for us? [01:19:39.760 --> 01:19:41.920] No, I think you pretty much covered it. [01:19:41.920 --> 01:19:42.920] I appreciate that. [01:19:42.920 --> 01:19:46.480] That's a great input and I'll take those steps. [01:19:46.480 --> 01:19:47.480] Okay. [01:19:47.480 --> 01:19:50.400] Then we will definitely be in touch on this. [01:19:50.400 --> 01:19:51.400] Okay. [01:19:51.400 --> 01:19:52.400] Thanks. [01:19:52.400 --> 01:19:53.400] Good night. [01:19:53.400 --> 01:19:54.400] Okay. [01:19:54.400 --> 01:19:58.080] So now I'm going to go to Rader in Oregon. [01:19:58.080 --> 01:20:00.680] Rader, are you there this time? [01:20:00.680 --> 01:20:01.680] I am. [01:20:01.680 --> 01:20:02.680] Gotcha. [01:20:02.680 --> 01:20:07.960] But remember what I said before, the Truth Raider is a TMI kind of a guy. [01:20:07.960 --> 01:20:08.960] Okay. [01:20:08.960 --> 01:20:11.640] We couldn't hear you last time. [01:20:11.640 --> 01:20:12.640] Okay. [01:20:12.640 --> 01:20:13.640] What do you have for us today? [01:20:13.640 --> 01:20:19.360] Well, speaking about that, I did archive that and I was still saying, hey, Randy, I am here. [01:20:19.360 --> 01:20:22.760] I don't know what happened when somebody's in there, but I must have said something that [01:20:22.760 --> 01:20:28.000] somebody didn't like and disconnected it or something, disconnected what I was saying. [01:20:28.000 --> 01:20:29.000] Anyway. [01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:39.280] Well, that subject is, it is what it is and as they say in the end, it's all good. [01:20:39.280 --> 01:20:45.560] I have this interesting scenario now with my case coming up. [01:20:45.560 --> 01:20:51.520] I think I'm going to have to file a Title 42 concerning my case and why I have to do [01:20:51.520 --> 01:20:58.080] that is because if you take it to the state with these cases, traffic stops and such with [01:20:58.080 --> 01:21:02.880] police officers or sheriff's deputies, constables, or would it be highway patrol or state troopers [01:21:02.880 --> 01:21:08.280] or whatever, they're always going to throw the case out in the state level. [01:21:08.280 --> 01:21:14.040] What I have to do is I'm going to have to file at least the minimum of one to two criminal [01:21:14.040 --> 01:21:19.480] charges against the officer and I'm going to have to get all the information I need [01:21:19.480 --> 01:21:24.560] to get the cab report, any records that I have to support my case and I'm going to have [01:21:24.560 --> 01:21:26.280] to file at Title 42. [01:21:26.280 --> 01:21:29.000] If I don't, they will 12B6 the case. [01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:31.080] Do you agree with that? [01:21:31.080 --> 01:21:33.560] Yes, I do. [01:21:33.560 --> 01:21:36.440] Take the state to the Fed, the Fed to the state. [01:21:36.440 --> 01:21:39.480] It's kind of a rule of thumb. [01:21:39.480 --> 01:21:40.480] Right. [01:21:40.480 --> 01:21:41.480] Right. [01:21:41.480 --> 01:21:50.320] Look at pre-litigation discovery. [01:21:50.320 --> 01:21:52.800] Pre-litigation discovery. [01:21:52.800 --> 01:22:01.120] You can do depositions for the purpose of preserving evidence. [01:22:01.120 --> 01:22:05.120] That always makes them nuts. [01:22:05.120 --> 01:22:10.720] Pre-litigation discovery, they can't do a Rule 12 or any nonsense like that to dismiss [01:22:10.720 --> 01:22:15.580] because you hadn't filed anything yet. [01:22:15.580 --> 01:22:23.560] What pre-litigation discovery goes to is I think I have a claim here, but the evidence [01:22:23.560 --> 01:22:33.600] that I need to make sure that I have a claim is held by someone else or the defendant and [01:22:33.600 --> 01:22:37.800] they're not going to want to voluntarily release it. [01:22:37.800 --> 01:22:47.960] So in order to keep from bringing a unsupported claim to the court, but in the interest of [01:22:47.960 --> 01:22:56.280] ensuring that I have opportunity to address my issues in secretity, you can petition the [01:22:56.280 --> 01:23:01.480] court for pre-litigation discovery and they will authorize the depositions. [01:23:01.480 --> 01:23:02.480] Okay. [01:23:02.480 --> 01:23:07.560] That will make those guys nuts. [01:23:07.560 --> 01:23:13.480] When you haven't sued them, they really don't know what your claims are. [01:23:13.480 --> 01:23:17.560] So they don't know how to make up their lies. [01:23:17.560 --> 01:23:28.400] Well, basically and simply a case of the lack of a subject matter jurisdiction. [01:23:28.400 --> 01:23:34.560] And I heard that's what you file in your cases concerning transportation code and the vehicle [01:23:34.560 --> 01:23:35.560] code. [01:23:35.560 --> 01:23:39.920] Oh, okay, then let me make a suggestion. [01:23:39.920 --> 01:23:48.080] If you can definitively establish that by code and the challenge of subject matter jurisdiction [01:23:48.080 --> 01:23:58.280] we're bringing is we're saying that under 4.13 Texas administrative code, these are [01:23:58.280 --> 01:24:05.000] the locations in the state of Texas that can enforce transportation code. [01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:07.720] A city with over 50,000 people. [01:24:07.720 --> 01:24:20.720] A city with under 25,000, over 20,000 in a county within 25 miles of an international [01:24:20.720 --> 01:24:24.520] airport and has a national defense highway in it. [01:24:24.520 --> 01:24:28.940] And you got all kind of crazy stuff like this. [01:24:28.940 --> 01:24:38.840] One of them is a city of over 10,000 people in a county that borders two states. [01:24:38.840 --> 01:24:47.460] Well, there are two counties in Texas that border two states, Cass County and Dalem County. [01:24:47.460 --> 01:24:52.240] And neither one of them have a city of that size. [01:24:52.240 --> 01:24:54.020] So it's nuts. [01:24:54.020 --> 01:24:55.020] It's just wacko. [01:24:55.020 --> 01:24:58.480] But it's old. [01:24:58.480 --> 01:25:01.380] And we say you don't meet these requirements. [01:25:01.380 --> 01:25:08.440] And even if you did, the code says that the sheriff can appoint five people to enforce [01:25:08.440 --> 01:25:10.080] transportation code. [01:25:10.080 --> 01:25:15.320] One of whom can be a municipal officer if the municipality meets all these crazy requirements [01:25:15.320 --> 01:25:16.320] I was talking about. [01:25:16.320 --> 01:25:23.580] And then he has to go through Department of Public Safety certification. [01:25:23.580 --> 01:25:29.720] So Mr. Municipal Police Officer, my question to you is, are you that one officer in the [01:25:29.720 --> 01:25:34.480] county? [01:25:34.480 --> 01:25:38.260] Can you prove that you're that one officer in the county? [01:25:38.260 --> 01:25:43.760] If you can't, then I have a subject matter jurisdiction challenge. [01:25:43.760 --> 01:25:54.960] And if I get past that, then what evidence do you have to indicate that I was operating [01:25:54.960 --> 01:26:08.780] a motor vehicle as opposed to driving a conveyance or operating a motor vehicle or operating [01:26:08.780 --> 01:26:11.060] a conveyance? [01:26:11.060 --> 01:26:13.460] Operating conveyance is not commercial. [01:26:13.460 --> 01:26:18.160] So with all of that, there's no way they can get there. [01:26:18.160 --> 01:26:22.660] So we're going strictly statutory. [01:26:22.660 --> 01:26:26.180] And I'm not even citing any case law. [01:26:26.180 --> 01:26:27.180] It's what the code says. [01:26:27.180 --> 01:26:28.180] It's on your end of... [01:26:28.180 --> 01:26:29.180] Yes, sir. [01:26:29.180 --> 01:26:34.980] Do you have code like that that you can construct that they can't get over? [01:26:34.980 --> 01:26:35.980] Right. [01:26:35.980 --> 01:26:43.580] All right, well, there's a question shifting gears here on the details of my case. [01:26:43.580 --> 01:26:49.580] The traffic stop itself is a custodial arrest subsequent to the custodial arrest by being [01:26:49.580 --> 01:26:54.300] detained and being seized in my liberty. [01:26:54.300 --> 01:27:00.260] When they put the handcuffs on you, when they go physical, go hands on, does that at that [01:27:00.260 --> 01:27:05.940] point constitute imprisonment? [01:27:05.940 --> 01:27:15.660] If you cannot leave, technically that constitutes imprisonment if you have been arrested in [01:27:15.660 --> 01:27:20.380] your right to movement. [01:27:20.380 --> 01:27:24.900] But what constitutes a terrorist stop, it's dubious. [01:27:24.900 --> 01:27:30.220] It's variable depending on where you're at. [01:27:30.220 --> 01:27:31.520] I don't ever want to get there. [01:27:31.520 --> 01:27:33.380] That gets too close to merits. [01:27:33.380 --> 01:27:35.020] All right. [01:27:35.020 --> 01:27:46.140] Okay, in Oregon, in Oregon, I take it this is an Oregon case because this shows you're [01:27:46.140 --> 01:27:50.340] from Oregon. [01:27:50.340 --> 01:27:58.980] Does the transportation code specifically refer to commerce? [01:27:58.980 --> 01:28:03.660] Do you have that definitively in law where you can cite it? [01:28:03.660 --> 01:28:10.540] I can look in there, but as I've searched before, it makes no mention so much of our [01:28:10.540 --> 01:28:11.540] activity. [01:28:11.540 --> 01:28:19.660] It just generalizes all activity as driving and it doesn't define commercial, you know, [01:28:19.660 --> 01:28:23.220] versus private travel in the codes. [01:28:23.220 --> 01:28:30.820] Then you may have to go to the right to travel. [01:28:30.820 --> 01:28:41.140] You might ask the officer, if you were riding a horse, if I was riding a horse, would you [01:28:41.140 --> 01:28:46.020] ask before my license, do I need a license to ride a horse? [01:28:46.020 --> 01:28:47.020] Okay. [01:28:47.020 --> 01:28:51.140] He's going to say, no, it goes to a motorized vehicle. [01:28:51.140 --> 01:28:52.140] Okay. [01:28:52.140 --> 01:28:56.260] If I was in an electric wheelchair, would you ask me for a license? [01:28:56.260 --> 01:28:57.260] Right. [01:28:57.260 --> 01:29:00.860] Now, Randy, there are some exclusions since you mentioned that, I understand a little [01:29:00.860 --> 01:29:02.620] bit better what you're asking there. [01:29:02.620 --> 01:29:09.220] There is some exclusions to like scooters, like motorized wheelchairs, et cetera. [01:29:09.220 --> 01:29:16.300] Let's see a motorized lawnmower that you operate and steer. [01:29:16.300 --> 01:29:17.300] Those are excluded. [01:29:17.300 --> 01:29:22.220] It has some, it's some that they make exemptions for. [01:29:22.220 --> 01:29:23.220] Yes. [01:29:23.220 --> 01:29:35.620] So you might have to go to the licensing aspect as infringing on a right. [01:29:35.620 --> 01:29:43.620] Not quite as clear as we have in Texas. [01:29:43.620 --> 01:29:45.540] We got really dumb stuff in Texas. [01:29:45.540 --> 01:29:49.220] It's great to work with. [01:29:49.220 --> 01:29:57.500] So you need to look close at your code and look close at the, the licensing requirements. [01:29:57.500 --> 01:30:04.980] How does the state of, or these days, the government seems to have its hands in almost [01:30:04.980 --> 01:30:09.540] every activity, believe it or not in some places, even dying is illegal. [01:30:09.540 --> 01:30:15.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with the colorful details in just a moment. [01:30:15.300 --> 01:30:16.860] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:16.860 --> 01:30:20.460] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:20.460 --> 01:30:25.260] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:25.260 --> 01:30:30.820] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:30.820 --> 01:30:34.860] Privacy it's worth hanging onto this public service announcement is brought to you by [01:30:34.860 --> 01:30:40.840] start page.com the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. [01:30:40.840 --> 01:30:44.740] Start over with start page. [01:30:44.740 --> 01:30:46.460] Dying is illegal in Florida. [01:30:46.460 --> 01:30:47.860] Coloring your pet that is. [01:30:47.860 --> 01:30:53.860] The city of Jacksonville fined Christine Hill 250 bucks for coloring her pet poodle's paws [01:30:53.860 --> 01:30:55.380] pink for Halloween. [01:30:55.380 --> 01:31:00.040] She had used a harmless dye specially made for dogs, but no matter, artificially coloring [01:31:00.040 --> 01:31:03.140] your pet's fur is a violation in her state. [01:31:03.140 --> 01:31:07.580] The dog wasn't chained up in a vacant lot, caged puppy mill style or abused. [01:31:07.580 --> 01:31:11.660] Rather, Hill and her beautifully groomed poodle were taking a leisurely walk when they were [01:31:11.660 --> 01:31:15.380] accosted and fined by a city animal control officer. [01:31:15.380 --> 01:31:19.820] The law was created to prevent harm to animals, and I'm all for protecting animals, but what [01:31:19.820 --> 01:31:21.060] about common sense? [01:31:21.060 --> 01:31:23.300] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:31:23.300 --> 01:31:30.740] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:30.740 --> 01:31:36.100] This is building seven, a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [01:31:36.100 --> 01:31:41.540] The government says that fire brought it down, however 1,500 architects and engineers concluded [01:31:41.540 --> 01:31:43.180] it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.180 --> 01:31:47.180] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives, but thousands of my fellow [01:31:47.180 --> 01:31:48.620] first responders are dying. [01:31:48.620 --> 01:31:49.940] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:49.940 --> 01:31:50.940] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:50.940 --> 01:31:52.460] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:52.460 --> 01:31:53.460] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.460 --> 01:31:55.140] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:55.140 --> 01:31:57.740] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:57.740 --> 01:31:59.700] Go to rememberbuilding7.org today. [01:31:59.700 --> 01:32:03.060] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. [01:32:03.060 --> 01:32:06.300] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:06.300 --> 01:32:09.940] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting [01:32:09.940 --> 01:32:10.940] them to pay for it. [01:32:10.940 --> 01:32:12.740] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails. [01:32:12.740 --> 01:32:14.500] But I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:14.500 --> 01:32:18.340] That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for [01:32:18.340 --> 01:32:21.100] you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:21.100 --> 01:32:25.340] And we accept Bitcoin as a multi-year A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with [01:32:25.340 --> 01:32:26.680] zero complaints. [01:32:26.680 --> 01:32:31.040] You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the [01:32:31.040 --> 01:32:32.100] first time. [01:32:32.100 --> 01:32:40.780] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com, mention the crypto show and get $100 off, [01:32:40.780 --> 01:32:45.420] and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:45.420 --> 01:32:50.500] So if those out-of-town roofers come knockin', your door should be lockin'. [01:32:50.500 --> 01:32:56.500] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:56.500 --> 01:32:58.860] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:58.860 --> 01:33:00.740] May not actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:00.740 --> 01:33:17.060] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, LogosRadioNetwork.com. [01:33:17.060 --> 01:33:34.620] All right, here we go. [01:33:34.620 --> 01:33:41.620] They come from natural divinity With steadfast roots and authenticity [01:33:41.620 --> 01:33:47.620] As the tools to regain dignity And rebuild the crime divinity [01:33:47.620 --> 01:33:54.620] And I say Truth in nature must be justice I believe [01:33:54.620 --> 01:34:00.620] Truth in nature must be justice [01:34:00.620 --> 01:34:05.620] And though it's a daunting task At least I got the decency [01:34:05.620 --> 01:34:10.620] To ask them all to just take off the silly mask [01:34:10.620 --> 01:34:15.620] And in the light of day we all will pass And if we choose ingenuity [01:34:15.620 --> 01:34:18.620] To use against the workers of iniquity [01:34:18.620 --> 01:34:30.620] To use against the workers of iniquity [01:34:48.620 --> 01:34:54.620] I say Truth in ingenuity To use against the workers of iniquity [01:34:54.620 --> 01:35:21.620] Truth in ingenuity To use against the workers of iniquity [01:35:21.620 --> 01:35:24.620] We're talking about [01:35:24.620 --> 01:35:27.620] Subject matter jurisdiction [01:35:27.620 --> 01:35:30.620] And subject matter jurisdiction, yeah [01:35:30.620 --> 01:35:44.620] And how does Oregon have the authority to regulate what, according to the Fed, is a right? [01:35:44.620 --> 01:35:54.620] The only thing I find is the U.S. Title Codes, and it's something like U.S. Title Code 18, and that's the right to travel. [01:35:54.620 --> 01:36:02.620] But I've talked to Eddie about that, and I said that has nothing to do with what you're trying to argue. [01:36:02.620 --> 01:36:07.620] What you're trying to argue is the subject matter jurisdiction in the first place. [01:36:07.620 --> 01:36:18.620] He says that's what my case is about, being stopped for a civil infraction, which an officer cannot do. [01:36:18.620 --> 01:36:24.620] And I found that to be compatible with Section 800. [01:36:24.620 --> 01:36:30.620] I'm trying to find the exact code. I was trying to do research on the computer here, and I can't find exactly which one it is. [01:36:30.620 --> 01:36:44.620] It's in Chapter 800 of the Oregon Revised Statutes, and it clearly states an officer may not make an arrest for a civil infraction. [01:36:44.620 --> 01:36:53.620] Okay, is that qualified, or is that a general for any civil infraction? [01:36:53.620 --> 01:37:02.620] Yes, any civil infraction, but this is under the Transportation Code Section 800 of the Oregon Revised Statutes. [01:37:02.620 --> 01:37:08.620] Okay. Are all traffic violations infractions? [01:37:08.620 --> 01:37:20.620] Yes. The traffic violations, unless they fall under the Penal Code, for example, if you cause an accident, like a hit and run, then that falls under Penal Code. [01:37:20.620 --> 01:37:26.620] If you're found to be intoxicated behind the wheel, then that's a criminal issue, and that falls under the Penal Code Statute. [01:37:26.620 --> 01:37:38.620] Okay, that's the same way in Texas. If you're driving on an invalid driver's license a second time, then it's a Class B misdemeanor, and that's outside infraction. [01:37:38.620 --> 01:37:56.620] But otherwise, they're all infractions. So, they can do a stop and sight. So, how does that get you to subject matter jurisdiction? [01:37:56.620 --> 01:38:09.620] Well, from what Eddie told me, you know, very demonstrably, you know, very emphatically, he told me, the stop itself is illegal. [01:38:09.620 --> 01:38:21.620] The stop is the custodial arrest, and that is not, that's not lawful, that they cannot do, because... [01:38:21.620 --> 01:38:37.620] Well, the problem with that is that Terry v. Ohio, they made a distinction between arrest and a Terry stop, and arrest and detention. [01:38:37.620 --> 01:38:50.620] So, there is a legal distinction between the two. I don't think we'll get past Terry v. Ohio on that issue. [01:38:50.620 --> 01:39:03.620] No. What Eddie was referencing was the case of Trevisant v. Florida, that case that he was saying that I should use that as an example. [01:39:03.620 --> 01:39:13.620] Okay, I know about Trevisant, how much he sued, that he sued for quite a bit, but I don't know the particulars of the case. [01:39:13.620 --> 01:39:17.620] He was, I believe, stopped for about 20 minutes or so. [01:39:17.620 --> 01:39:33.620] Yeah, but he was a state rep or something. He was a high-level official. But, I mean, how does that relate to this issue? I don't understand that part. [01:39:33.620 --> 01:39:44.620] You said that somewhat similar, that I can use as an example, because it falls under being a traffic stop, a civil... [01:39:44.620 --> 01:39:50.620] Okay, so in Trevisant, they didn't actually take him to jail, they just held him for 20 minutes? [01:39:50.620 --> 01:39:54.620] Yes, that wouldn't be enough time to be able to... Yeah, that's what I was asking before. [01:39:54.620 --> 01:40:03.620] It says, well, there wouldn't be enough time to be able to go through the process, even to get him into a detention facility in that short amount of time. [01:40:03.620 --> 01:40:09.620] Good point. Unless they stopped him right in front of the jail and walked him straight in. [01:40:09.620 --> 01:40:14.620] Right. [01:40:14.620 --> 01:40:28.620] Okay, this is a little bit beyond my scope. I'm getting familiar with Texas law on that issue, but generally, this is Eddie's area for the most part. [01:40:28.620 --> 01:40:40.620] Yeah, that's sometimes difficult to get into, but I just want to get all around second opinions about what I should do, and your expertise is court matters. [01:40:40.620 --> 01:40:48.620] And you know all the ins and outs on how to file and lawsuits specifically and things. [01:40:48.620 --> 01:40:59.620] So I wanted to get your take on that, or if I should just go ahead and not mess with a small cheese, I just go to the top and just file it as a Title 42 to cover myself. [01:40:59.620 --> 01:41:14.620] And then, I don't know, I guess I have to file criminal charges against the officer, and what Eddie says is the officer, typically when they stop you on the side of the road, the officer is going to commit at least the minimum of five felonies, is what he says. [01:41:14.620 --> 01:41:34.620] Well, I'm not sure how he gets there. I don't necessarily see five felonies, certainly not in Texas, and I'm not familiar enough with Oregon law to be able to speak to whether he's committing felonies or not. [01:41:34.620 --> 01:41:51.620] Well, this is what I've got. I've got the stop, which is a custodial arrest, then I have a hands-on situation where physically they put the handcuffs on, so I guess it constitutes assault and battery. Does that constitute assault and battery by officer? [01:41:51.620 --> 01:42:06.620] Well, it could certainly, not necessarily battery unless they injured you, but it would certainly constitute assault, and the fact that they were prominently displaying deadly weapons would enhance it. [01:42:06.620 --> 01:42:22.620] In Texas, it would be first to be felony aggravated assault, but it's not that way in every other state. I just looked at Colorado, and it's certainly not that way in Colorado. So, you'd have to look specifically at Oregon code. [01:42:22.620 --> 01:42:36.620] Now, subject to that arrest, that claims that that gives them the authority to be able to go into my automobile and do what they call an inventory, is that burglary. [01:42:36.620 --> 01:42:39.620] Did they tow your vehicle? [01:42:39.620 --> 01:42:40.620] Yes, they did. [01:42:40.620 --> 01:42:46.620] Okay, then they have to inventory it to make sure nothing's missing. [01:42:46.620 --> 01:42:48.620] Okay. [01:42:48.620 --> 01:42:50.620] So that they can do. [01:42:50.620 --> 01:42:51.620] Is that strong enough? [01:42:51.620 --> 01:43:05.620] They arrested my brother-in-law in my car. He run two cops off the road. The tow truck driver brings in a bag of dope. [01:43:05.620 --> 01:43:24.620] I was not happy at my brother-in-law, but the fact that the tow truck driver brought it in was a problem. So I went to the police department and asked to see the inventory of the vehicle when they towed it. [01:43:24.620 --> 01:43:39.620] And the chief of police was pretty smart. He said, Mr. Kelton, do you mind if I ask why? I said, well, I want to make sure that $1,000 of mad money I keep under the rubber mat is still there. [01:43:39.620 --> 01:43:47.620] These two cops are standing there, do you want any mad money under there? No, there wasn't. Well, then where's the inventory to show what was there? [01:43:47.620 --> 01:43:59.620] Oh, these guys were hopping up and down. That points out where they have a right to do an inventory so that I don't come in there and make food. [01:43:59.620 --> 01:44:17.620] Nutritious food is real body armor. It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs. Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States and classified it as a Schedule 1 drug to hide it behind the marijuana plant? [01:44:17.620 --> 01:44:29.620] Many have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know what hemp is. So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp. They are different varieties of the same species. [01:44:29.620 --> 01:44:47.620] HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about. Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients. [01:44:47.620 --> 01:45:00.620] Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you. Only at HempUSA.org. [01:45:00.620 --> 01:45:22.620] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:22.620 --> 01:45:34.620] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.620 --> 01:45:52.620] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts. You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.620 --> 01:46:12.620] Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner, or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EASY. [01:46:12.620 --> 01:46:37.620] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, the Rule of Law Radio. That was interesting. Okay, I think I'm in. I get beeps that you can't hear when I come in and out. I got two there and they were kind of confusing. Okay. Truth, are you there? [01:46:37.620 --> 01:46:52.620] Yes. Randy, I think I got all the information I need. I just wanted to get your take on just going to the top and finding Title 42, assuming everybody in the food chain, right? [01:46:52.620 --> 01:47:10.620] Yep. I had a lawyer once tell me over a suit I had against the sheriff, he said, looks like you threw everything but the kitchen sink at him. I said, yeah, I did. And he said, you know, that's kind of like the horse dumpling theory. [01:47:10.620 --> 01:47:23.620] I said, well, what's the horse dumpling theory? He said, well, if you throw enough, you know, horse dumplings are dry and fibrous. If you throw enough of them up against the wall, one of them is locked with a stick. [01:47:23.620 --> 01:47:27.620] Okay. Got it. [01:47:27.620 --> 01:47:38.620] Okay. Okay. Good luck. We got one more caller and one segment left. Thank you, Truth. Now we're going to Dean in Louisiana. [01:47:38.620 --> 01:47:40.620] Hello, Randy. [01:47:40.620 --> 01:47:44.620] Hello, Dean. What do you have for us today? [01:47:44.620 --> 01:48:08.620] I got a little speeding ticket and I want to show this. I got your book and I got the jurisdictionary both about two weeks ago. So I'm just getting my feet wet. But this is what I'm thinking about throwing at this ticket. [01:48:08.620 --> 01:48:37.620] In our constitution, section 13, if I can read this little paragraph, because when any person has been arrested or detained in connection with the investigation or commission of any offense, he shall be fully advised of the reason for his arrest or detention, his right to remain silent, his right against self-incrimination, his right of assistance of counsel, and his indigent, his right to court, [01:48:37.620 --> 01:49:01.620] the court appointed a counsel. And then it has a section about criminal prosecution. I need to get it. But when this little young, pretty, pretty little thing of the state trooper gave me this ticket, all she did was just tell me, you know, why she stopped me and the speed I was doing. [01:49:01.620 --> 01:49:07.620] Wait, wait, wait a minute. You didn't call her a cute little heifer, did you? [01:49:07.620 --> 01:49:10.620] No, but I really had to hold my tongue. [01:49:10.620 --> 01:49:17.620] I did that to a sheriff's deputy once and it did not work out well. [01:49:17.620 --> 01:49:31.620] Yeah, I really had to hold back from saying anything about it because she was the looker. I had never seen a state trooper and I've got a bunch. I know just about all of them, but I don't know where she came from, but she was something else, man. [01:49:31.620 --> 01:49:43.620] But she didn't advise me of any of my rights per se. And I'm wondering if I can use that when I get her on the ticket. [01:49:43.620 --> 01:50:00.620] Okay, the Constitution requires this, but even though it's a constitutional violation, unless you can show that you were harmed by that, you have no claim. [01:50:00.620 --> 01:50:08.620] If they attempt to use anything you said against you, then you have a claim. [01:50:08.620 --> 01:50:19.620] Okay, I'm saying that off the top of my head. We're really talking about Louisiana here. And most of my experience is with United States law. [01:50:19.620 --> 01:50:35.620] Louisiana is a whole other country. And I'm not terribly familiar with Louisiana law. Most of the states are based on Spanish law. The colonies are based on Old English law. [01:50:35.620 --> 01:50:46.620] Louisiana is based on French law. So I'm not sure what that means in the Constitution. [01:50:46.620 --> 01:51:00.620] It says they have to do these things. But is there a direct remedy for them not doing these things or do you have to show harm? [01:51:00.620 --> 01:51:02.620] Did that make sense? [01:51:02.620 --> 01:51:16.620] Yeah. After she told me she stopped me and the speed I was doing, she asked me about it or something, I looked at her and I said, no comment. [01:51:16.620 --> 01:51:28.620] And I never said anything else about why she stopped me. We didn't talk about that. We talked about some other things, but nothing about the stop. [01:51:28.620 --> 01:51:46.620] So the fact that she wrote me a ticket and I'm in court, that to me is harmful enough. [01:51:46.620 --> 01:51:59.620] You can't claim it as harm unless you can show that something more than the fact that she didn't give you all of this advice. [01:51:59.620 --> 01:52:05.620] I really don't know about Louisiana law and how it's structured this way. [01:52:05.620 --> 01:52:16.620] In Texas and in the United States, a violation of a constitutional right is harm per se. [01:52:16.620 --> 01:52:29.620] But is a requirement to do a certain thing, does that go to a constitutional right? [01:52:29.620 --> 01:52:38.620] So, yeah, they're required to do this certain thing, but does a failure to do that certain thing violate you in a right? [01:52:38.620 --> 01:52:57.620] Now, everywhere else, if I have a right to due process and the police, when they do what they do, must follow law and due process ensures that they grant me all my rights. [01:52:57.620 --> 01:53:13.620] And that's why I'm having this problem. Do I have a right to be given this notice or does the officer merely have a requirement to give me that notice? [01:53:13.620 --> 01:53:16.620] If you have a right, you can certainly make the claim. [01:53:16.620 --> 01:53:35.620] Right. And I've got a lot of speed and tickets and I've never had any officer ever do anything more than what she did as far as advising me of my speed, what I was doing, why she stopped me, why they stopped me. [01:53:35.620 --> 01:53:47.620] You know, they always tell me why they stopped me and ask me if I have anything to say about it. And, you know, that's the end of it. [01:53:47.620 --> 01:53:56.620] So what about jurisdiction? [01:53:56.620 --> 01:54:10.620] Now, that goes to how the Louisiana Transportation Code is structured. There's always an issue about licensing an activity. [01:54:10.620 --> 01:54:26.620] You can license plumbers to be plumbers, electricians, and these guys are licensed because if they don't do their job right, they can cause considerable harm. [01:54:26.620 --> 01:54:41.620] Doctors, lawyers, truck drivers, commercial drivers, commercial drivers use the highway as a source of income. [01:54:41.620 --> 01:55:04.620] And that was the original reason Teamsters licensing were originally created is because the public was being pushed off of a bridge between Pittsburgh and New Jersey because so many professional carriage drivers were carting people back and forth for pay. [01:55:04.620 --> 01:55:13.620] That they decided to license these guys to pay for upkeep with a bridge that they were damaging with all this extra use. [01:55:13.620 --> 01:55:27.620] So that's the theory we go by on saying that you're not engaged in commerce. Now, you may have a driver's license and you may have license plates on your vehicle. [01:55:27.620 --> 01:55:36.620] And that would initially give an officer a reasonable probable cause to believe that you were in commerce, but that's not enough. [01:55:36.620 --> 01:55:47.620] The fact that you're licensed to be in commerce and you have a driver's license that allows you to be in commerce, are you in commerce or are you deadhead? [01:55:47.620 --> 01:56:04.620] In Louisiana, they have, they issue different types of licenses, A, B, C, and D, commercial license, and they got everything detailed as far as this licensing goes. [01:56:04.620 --> 01:56:12.620] Okay, I would expect the A is the lowest. [01:56:12.620 --> 01:56:20.620] What does it authorize you to do? [01:56:20.620 --> 01:56:22.620] I don't have it right in front of me. [01:56:22.620 --> 01:56:25.620] Okay, here's where I'm going. [01:56:25.620 --> 01:56:32.620] Does it authorize you to operate a motor vehicle on a public thoroughfare? [01:56:32.620 --> 01:56:47.620] Or, like in Texas and every other state I've been to, does it authorize you to transport persons, property, or commodities for hire? [01:56:47.620 --> 01:57:06.620] Ours authorizes us, authorizes me to transport up to eight people at one time or to operate a vehicle under 26,000 pounds gross vehicle weight in commerce, transporting goods or commodities for hire. [01:57:06.620 --> 01:57:10.620] That's what that license authorizes me to do. [01:57:10.620 --> 01:57:19.620] Does it authorize me specifically to operate a motorized conveyance on a public thoroughfare? [01:57:19.620 --> 01:57:22.620] It's because I already got that right. [01:57:22.620 --> 01:57:30.620] That, essentially, according to the feds and tons of case law, you can't license. [01:57:30.620 --> 01:57:33.620] You can't license me walking. [01:57:33.620 --> 01:57:39.620] You can't license me standing on my head stuck quacking like a chicken. [01:57:39.620 --> 01:57:43.620] I have a right to do that if I want to. [01:57:43.620 --> 01:57:52.620] You can only license me for the performance of a commercial enterprise. [01:57:52.620 --> 01:57:54.620] That's the way it is everywhere. [01:57:54.620 --> 01:58:00.620] I'm not terribly familiar with Louisiana law, but I'm almost certain that's going to be the same thing. [01:58:00.620 --> 01:58:06.620] Have you read the transportation code in Louisiana? [01:58:06.620 --> 01:58:16.620] Yeah, well, I've read it, but I keep re-reading it. [01:58:16.620 --> 01:58:18.620] Sometimes it takes some study. [01:58:18.620 --> 01:58:19.620] I am sorry. [01:58:19.620 --> 01:58:22.620] We just ran out of time. [01:58:22.620 --> 01:58:23.620] Call back next week. [01:58:23.620 --> 01:58:27.620] I'd like to go into Louisiana a little further. [01:58:27.620 --> 01:58:28.620] Not personally. [01:58:28.620 --> 01:58:29.620] The furthest I've been is Lake Charles. [01:58:29.620 --> 01:58:35.620] There was a bunch of coonasses down there. [01:58:35.620 --> 01:58:37.620] Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Wheel of Law Radio. [01:58:37.620 --> 01:58:39.620] We'll be back next week. [01:58:39.620 --> 01:58:49.620] Thank you all for listening, and good night. [01:58:49.620 --> 01:58:57.620] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free, a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:57.620 --> 01:59:04.620] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse, [01:59:04.620 --> 01:59:08.620] helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.620 --> 01:59:11.620] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.620 --> 01:59:20.620] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.620 --> 01:59:30.620] This translation is highly accurate, and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.620 --> 01:59:32.620] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.620 --> 01:59:40.620] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:40.620 --> 01:59:48.620] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:48.620 --> 01:59:53.620] Looking for some truth? You found it. [01:59:53.620 --> 02:00:02.620] LogosRadioNetwork.com