[00:00.000 --> 00:10.000] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily bulletins for the commodity market. [00:10.000 --> 00:23.000] Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives. [00:23.000 --> 00:45.000] Markets for Wednesday, September 21, 2016, are currently trading with gold at $1,336.62 an ounce, silver at $19.78 an ounce, Texas crude at $43.44 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $600 U.S. currency. [00:45.000 --> 00:58.000] In history, the year 1981, Sandra Day O'Connor is unanimously approved by the U.S. Senate as the first female Supreme Court justice today in history. [00:58.000 --> 01:08.000] In recent news, Ahmad Kham Rahami, the man sought by state investigators for possible connections to the detonating of some explosives in a dumpster in Manhattan and on a route in Seaside Park, New Jersey, [01:08.000 --> 01:19.000] and in a backpack which was detonated by police around a train station in Elizabeth, got into a shootout with local PD. Police and FBI had announced early Monday that they were seeking Rahami in connection with the bombings in the Chelsea District, [01:19.000 --> 01:29.000] when as Lyndon Police Captain James Sarniki told local NBC affiliates, officers were responding to a call about a person sleeping in a doorway of a local bar turned out to be him. [01:29.000 --> 01:35.000] When approaching, the officers noticed his resemblance to the wanted bulletin, and they then ordered him to show his hands. [01:35.000 --> 01:42.000] Rahami pulled out a handgun and fired a shot at the officer, striking him in the abdomen. Luckily, most of the round was stopped by a protective vest. [01:42.000 --> 01:50.000] The officer returned fire, but Rahami simply walked away. He was eventually shot down the street by several police officers, where again shots were exchanged. [01:50.000 --> 01:55.000] He was taken away in an ambulance to University Hospital in Newark, where his condition is still unknown. [01:55.000 --> 02:05.000] We have every reason to believe this was an act of terror, Mayor of New York Bill Belasio said in a news conference, also stating that investigators are not seeking any other individuals at the moment. [02:05.000 --> 02:09.000] That is, even though apparently, according to the FBI, Rahami's role in the explosives remains unknown. [02:09.000 --> 02:22.000] Even though he was carrying a notebook containing his pro-jihadist writings, including a reference to the slain al-Qaeda terrorist Anwar al-Waqi, and notes about killing the kufar, or unbeliever, as was stated by law enforcement to the Times, [02:22.000 --> 02:31.000] the FBI didn't disclose whether the five people taken into custody Sunday night and later released were linked to Rahami or how Rahami and his family fit into all of it. [02:31.000 --> 02:37.000] And it was reported yesterday by the New York Times that his father told authorities two years ago that his son was a terrorist. [02:37.000 --> 02:45.000] As of Monday, Ahmed has been charged with five counts of attempted murder on law enforcement officers and two second-degree counts of his ownership of a handgun. [02:45.000 --> 02:52.000] Bill has been set at $5.2 million by State Superior Judge. [02:52.000 --> 03:16.000] This is Rick Roady with your Lowdown for September 21, 2016. [03:16.000 --> 03:22.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Lulula Radio, and we're talking to Stephen in California. [03:22.000 --> 03:32.000] So, Steve, I would suggest you do some research on due process. [03:32.000 --> 03:38.000] Send me an email. My jurisprudence side is down. [03:38.000 --> 03:51.000] I will send you a habeas corpus I wrote for a kid in Conwell, but it's essentially a dissertation on due process. [03:51.000 --> 04:01.000] It's written in Texas law, but I think the primary case is a federal case, and I believe it's out of Florida. It's Gerstein Pugh. [04:01.000 --> 04:11.000] But this will walk you right down due process, and then you can look at Florida law and see how it relates. [04:11.000 --> 04:19.000] And also, most of this is based on federal standards, so you can use this as a basis for a federal suit. [04:19.000 --> 04:28.000] It's got about 19 misdemeanor and felony charges you can bring against the officers and jailers. [04:28.000 --> 04:37.000] And it has nothing to do with the facts of the case. It only has to do with the procedure. [04:37.000 --> 04:38.000] Okay. [04:38.000 --> 04:43.000] So, this is not what they're used to having to argue. [04:43.000 --> 04:45.000] Right, right. [04:45.000 --> 04:57.000] Lawyers hate to have to research new stuff, especially if they know they're dealing with the pro se from hell. [04:57.000 --> 05:07.000] Because the pro se from hell is going to catch them misstating a piece of case law, and then he's going to ask for sanctions. [05:07.000 --> 05:12.000] And he's going to bar-grieve them, and he's going to make their life a living hell. [05:12.000 --> 05:24.000] So, they hate to do research anyway because, you know, you can make a mistake in law, but then you're not learned in counsel. [05:24.000 --> 05:35.000] Learning counsel brings case law to the court, and for the most part, the court trusts what counsel brings to them. [05:35.000 --> 05:41.000] If the judge trusts the case law that the lawyer brings, and he rules based on the case law, [05:41.000 --> 05:56.000] and say the lawyer's paralegal wrote up the motion or pleading and got the wrong citation on the case law, [05:56.000 --> 06:04.000] and the judge accepts it, and he sends it to the court of appeals, and the court of appeals clerk checks the case law and says, [06:04.000 --> 06:12.000] what the heck is this? This case is miscited, and the judge ruled on this case, and it's miscited. [06:12.000 --> 06:18.000] They're going to say, what is this stupid stuff you're doing? They're going to send it back to the judge. [06:18.000 --> 06:26.000] And the judge is not going to be a happy camper. [06:26.000 --> 06:34.000] So, Harmon Taylor said that he'll cut a button off the lawyer's shirt. [06:34.000 --> 06:46.000] So, lawyers are terrified of that. Even if the judge wouldn't sanction him, lawyers know that a judge can sanction him on a whim. [06:46.000 --> 06:54.000] So, I wouldn't want to be a lawyer. They're terrified. So, you get to take advantage of that. [06:54.000 --> 07:02.000] Send me an email, Randy at ruleoflawradio.com, and I will send you this habeas, [07:02.000 --> 07:07.000] and I'll look in my Florida folder and see what I've got. [07:07.000 --> 07:15.000] But read this habeas. It'll tell you how due process is supposed to work. [07:15.000 --> 07:24.000] Then you can go back. You find a federal suit in California. All this politics. [07:24.000 --> 07:30.000] They got to pay a California lawyer. If you think their lawyer won't throw them under the bus, [07:30.000 --> 07:36.000] he will gig them and gouge them and then toss them under the bus. [07:36.000 --> 07:43.000] And, you know, they know that a California lawyer is not going to cut him any slack. [07:43.000 --> 07:50.000] The California federal court is not going to cut him any slack either. [07:50.000 --> 07:55.000] So, you know, you change the politics on them. [07:55.000 --> 08:04.000] And then you ask the court to order mediation. [08:04.000 --> 08:12.000] So, you give them opportunity to come to the table and say, hey, guys, how about we just make all this go away? [08:12.000 --> 08:20.000] If that's your biggest concern, is the criminal, the charges against you, [08:20.000 --> 08:27.000] are they classy misdemeanors or do they carry jail time? [08:27.000 --> 08:29.000] They carry jail time. [08:29.000 --> 08:35.000] Yeah, that's what they want. They want to frighten you with that so they can get you to the courthouse steps [08:35.000 --> 08:39.000] and then deal back to some lesser charge. [08:39.000 --> 08:47.000] So, instead of letting them bring you to the courthouse steps, you bring them to the courthouse steps, [08:47.000 --> 08:50.000] but not the ones they want to be at. [08:50.000 --> 08:56.000] You think it's a good idea if I had a couple curveballs to go ahead and put those into play with these other courts [08:56.000 --> 09:04.000] because the anonymous tipster used a racial slur. [09:04.000 --> 09:09.000] It's on the 9-11 audio. I've already received it through public records request. [09:09.000 --> 09:18.000] It's a racial slur and it's actionable as heck out in California, but people keep telling me, oh, okay. [09:18.000 --> 09:22.000] Oh, wait a minute. [09:22.000 --> 09:30.000] A racial slur, the policeman made a racial slur speaking to the dispatcher? [09:30.000 --> 09:40.000] No, Mr. Kelton. The 9-11 caller made a racial slur and the dispatcher repeated it. [09:40.000 --> 09:47.000] Oh, wonderful. Now you get racial profiling. [09:47.000 --> 09:49.000] Yeah. [09:49.000 --> 09:57.000] And that's nice and political. It's in the public eye right now. [09:57.000 --> 09:58.000] Yeah. [09:58.000 --> 10:03.000] The police have been forbidden to engage in racial profiling. [10:03.000 --> 10:10.000] So that would be a great claim to bring to the federal court. [10:10.000 --> 10:18.000] You want to bring stuff they're not going to want to have to argue. [10:18.000 --> 10:22.000] It's all about the politics. [10:22.000 --> 10:38.000] You give them something they're not going to want to risk a ruling against them that would tie their hands. [10:38.000 --> 10:44.000] And you might use a term that someone I helped in Galveston used. [10:44.000 --> 10:54.000] They said, come to Galveston, come on vacation, leave on probation. [10:54.000 --> 11:05.000] You start putting out, putting video, YouTube videos out there saying Florida, come on vacation, leave on probation. [11:05.000 --> 11:11.000] The state is not going to be happy with that. [11:11.000 --> 11:17.000] That's how they make their money. Everything's political. [11:17.000 --> 11:32.000] My suggestion is send me an email, get this habeas, read through it, bone up on federal law and file a federal lawsuit against them. [11:32.000 --> 11:38.000] Any other questions you have that we didn't get to? [11:38.000 --> 11:42.000] Hold on, hold on, hold on. [11:42.000 --> 11:44.000] You're breaking up really bad. [11:44.000 --> 11:45.000] Okay. [11:45.000 --> 11:46.000] Give it a second. [11:46.000 --> 11:48.000] Sometimes these phones float in and out. [11:48.000 --> 11:49.000] Okay. [11:49.000 --> 11:54.000] Try to keep. [11:54.000 --> 11:59.000] Hello, Stephen. [11:59.000 --> 12:00.000] I am sorry, Stephen. [12:00.000 --> 12:07.000] You're breaking up so bad we can't understand anything you say. [12:07.000 --> 12:10.000] I'm sorry. [12:10.000 --> 12:12.000] The connection's completely faded out. [12:12.000 --> 12:15.000] Call us back again next Thursday. [12:15.000 --> 12:16.000] Okay. [12:16.000 --> 12:18.000] We're going to go to Mark in Wisconsin. [12:18.000 --> 12:27.000] Hello, Mark. [12:27.000 --> 12:28.000] Wait a minute. [12:28.000 --> 12:31.000] We have a problem here. [12:31.000 --> 12:37.000] You're breaking up just like Stephen was. [12:37.000 --> 12:38.000] Okay. [12:38.000 --> 12:39.000] Okay. [12:39.000 --> 12:40.000] Robert. [12:40.000 --> 12:41.000] Robert's our producer. [12:41.000 --> 12:49.000] Robert, am I breaking up or is the caller's breaking up? [12:49.000 --> 12:50.000] Okay. [12:50.000 --> 12:56.000] Then Mark, we must have something somewhere in the Internet side. [12:56.000 --> 13:02.000] My producer tells me I'm not breaking up coming to him. [13:02.000 --> 13:03.000] Okay. [13:03.000 --> 13:05.000] Talk to me again. [13:05.000 --> 13:06.000] All right. [13:06.000 --> 13:07.000] I'll try calling back in. [13:07.000 --> 13:08.000] No, no, no, no. [13:08.000 --> 13:09.000] Hold on. [13:09.000 --> 13:10.000] Now you're perfect. [13:10.000 --> 13:11.000] Oh, there. [13:11.000 --> 13:12.000] Hold on. [13:12.000 --> 13:13.000] There we go. [13:13.000 --> 13:14.000] Now you sound better. [13:14.000 --> 13:15.000] Yeah. [13:15.000 --> 13:16.000] It cleared up. [13:16.000 --> 13:17.000] Wonderful. [13:17.000 --> 13:18.000] Wonderful. [13:18.000 --> 13:19.000] Wonderful. [13:19.000 --> 13:28.200] For those listeners, this will be a bit of a rehash who listen regularly, but we had [13:28.200 --> 13:39.400] a situation where there was a criminal case and the person subject to the criminal case [13:39.400 --> 13:48.000] seems to have been getting preferential treatment in his criminal case. [13:48.000 --> 13:58.520] Ultimately, there was an attempt by, in the criminal case, there ended up becoming a suicide [13:58.520 --> 14:07.320] and there was an attempt to bury the public record via the attorney of the now dead attorney [14:07.320 --> 14:11.040] in the criminal case. [14:11.040 --> 14:22.040] As you have stated before, and the old host of jurists, or of Graves... [14:22.040 --> 14:25.880] No, Dr. Frederick Graves, yes. [14:25.880 --> 14:26.880] Frederick Graves, yes. [14:26.880 --> 14:32.480] When you said old, I was hoping you was talking about Dr. Graves and not me because he's [14:32.480 --> 14:35.960] old, but I'm young. [14:35.960 --> 14:37.760] Yes. [14:37.760 --> 14:50.040] Anyway, if you listen to his archives, he points out the idea that you should really, [14:50.040 --> 14:54.640] and you've mentioned this, but it's not a recurring theme with you, you should really [14:54.640 --> 14:59.880] read and understand the case law to help craft your particular arguments. [14:59.880 --> 15:07.720] Well, the arguments that were given for this case, it made it sound like I had to get something [15:07.720 --> 15:16.320] in nigh immediately, so I crafted up a really lousy four-page document that I sent to the [15:16.320 --> 15:22.520] email of the judge, the email to everybody involved, and I sent paper copies where I [15:22.520 --> 15:31.400] asked that the judge consider allowing my paperwork to be amicus curi brief to inform [15:31.400 --> 15:34.760] the court of why they shouldn't seal the record. [15:34.760 --> 15:42.440] That prompted an email exchange with the clerk, the judge's clerk, confirming that I had sent [15:42.440 --> 15:47.080] a paper version of the amicus in. [15:47.080 --> 15:53.320] It was then promptly filed in the criminal case record. [15:53.320 --> 16:01.480] I was then able to spend a week getting better documentation to create a 13-page version. [16:01.480 --> 16:07.240] It took a couple of days to get filed, but in the process of going through that, I was [16:07.240 --> 16:15.760] able to find other people who were more on point and have been fighting open and public [16:15.760 --> 16:24.080] records since the 1970s in the state of Wisconsin, which also happens to be in the 1970s when [16:24.080 --> 16:34.760] the local chief of police stated that the police blotter shouldn't be open to the public, [16:34.760 --> 16:35.760] and we've got a break. [16:35.760 --> 16:36.760] Yes, we do. [16:36.760 --> 16:37.760] That annoying music. [16:37.760 --> 16:48.480] This is Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, I call you number 512-646-1984. [16:48.480 --> 16:52.760] We do have some slots on the board, so if you have a question or comment, give us a [16:52.760 --> 16:53.760] call. [16:53.760 --> 17:00.200] We'll be right back. [17:00.200 --> 17:04.800] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [17:04.800 --> 17:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. [17:09.000 --> 17:13.320] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you [17:13.320 --> 17:14.320] can win too. [17:14.320 --> 17:19.240] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [17:19.240 --> 17:20.240] civil rights statutes. [17:20.240 --> 17:25.600] What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and [17:25.600 --> 17:30.000] phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial [17:30.000 --> 17:33.760] tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [17:33.760 --> 17:38.880] The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [17:38.880 --> 17:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [17:41.000 --> 17:46.520] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner [17:46.520 --> 17:49.520] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [17:49.520 --> 17:59.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [17:59.000 --> 18:01.000] collectors now. [18:01.000 --> 18:05.600] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area [18:05.600 --> 18:07.040] of nutrition. [18:07.040 --> 18:11.760] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [18:11.760 --> 18:17.440] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [18:17.440 --> 18:23.840] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can [18:23.840 --> 18:25.960] provide the nutrients you need. [18:25.960 --> 18:30.920] Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which [18:30.920 --> 18:31.920] we reject. [18:31.920 --> 18:37.280] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with [18:37.280 --> 18:40.120] Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [18:40.120 --> 18:46.400] When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support [18:46.400 --> 18:47.400] quality radio. [18:47.400 --> 18:52.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [18:52.000 --> 18:57.640] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and [18:57.640 --> 18:58.640] increase your income. [18:58.640 --> 18:59.640] Order now. [18:59.640 --> 19:06.640] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com. [19:06.640 --> 19:18.160] Well, don't let nothing get to you, only the father can do it for you, but don't let [19:18.160 --> 19:24.040] bad people hurt you until it's safe and get behind you. [19:24.040 --> 19:31.120] Okay, we are back, we're in the Kelton BlueBlood Radio, and we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin. [19:31.120 --> 19:42.680] Okay, you've got the amicus curiae in, and the chief of police wanted to make the blotter [19:42.680 --> 19:45.240] exempted from the public. [19:45.240 --> 19:48.920] So it sounds like you're going to have some good case law on this subject. [19:48.920 --> 19:52.600] Oh yes, and that was back in the 1970s. [19:52.600 --> 19:58.840] Ultimately, it prompted a trade group of newspapers to get together. [19:58.840 --> 20:06.680] Now in the process of finding the case law, I also found where the assembly was submitting [20:06.680 --> 20:15.340] new bills to attempt to remove records from the public in the interest of securing and [20:15.340 --> 20:24.200] not impacting employment options, which was exactly the argument that the chief of police [20:24.200 --> 20:28.080] had used in the 1970s. [20:28.080 --> 20:38.120] Now so the briefs get filed, the court date comes, the newspaper, the local newspaper [20:38.120 --> 20:49.560] sent a reporter who was there, the judge pointed out that in Wisconsin law back in the 1800s, [20:49.560 --> 20:56.840] the Supreme Court ruled it was the judge's responsibility to provide candles to reporters [20:56.840 --> 21:01.080] so that they could look at the public record. [21:01.080 --> 21:09.520] And he was not about to go the route of closing off the entire record. [21:09.520 --> 21:15.600] Now where this comes and circles back around for your show and your listeners about you [21:15.600 --> 21:21.000] will not win your case based on the law and the facts, you will win it based on the politics. [21:21.000 --> 21:30.320] So by doing the case law research, I found a ally in the form of the trade group that [21:30.320 --> 21:33.320] wants to keep records open. [21:33.320 --> 21:43.020] And they in turn called for their reporters, called the court and called people for feedback [21:43.020 --> 21:49.320] and leads off with the following, in an unusual case that raises open records questions as [21:49.320 --> 21:54.040] well as the specter of special treatment within the legal community. [21:54.040 --> 22:04.520] The article then also makes a statement that the victim's mother pointed out that he as [22:04.520 --> 22:09.840] an attorney was getting special treatment, so the attorney getting special treatment [22:09.840 --> 22:14.880] by other attorneys in the court was noted a couple of times. [22:14.880 --> 22:23.080] And then they go with the quote from the trade magazine stating that he was surprised to [22:23.080 --> 22:28.040] hear of an effort to seal an entire case and especially that a prosecutor would support [22:28.040 --> 22:30.000] the idea. [22:30.000 --> 22:33.320] Nowhere have the prosecutor come forward. [22:33.320 --> 22:42.120] However, the prosecutor yelled at the victim's mother because apparently a state representative [22:42.120 --> 22:50.040] called the prosecutor and she was yelling at the mother that the state representative [22:50.040 --> 22:54.320] calling the prosecutor was quote, illegal, unquote. [22:54.320 --> 23:02.520] So your attorney apparently educates in the law claiming that it's illegal for a representative [23:02.520 --> 23:08.280] to call, ask a question. [23:08.280 --> 23:09.280] Interesting. [23:09.280 --> 23:10.280] Yeah. [23:10.280 --> 23:15.200] So yeah, it's all kinds of interesting. [23:15.200 --> 23:24.440] This is in a hearing, this is surprising, a prosecutor yelling at the victim's mother. [23:24.440 --> 23:29.240] Have you talked to the victim's mother and suggested that she land on this prosecutor [23:29.240 --> 23:31.240] like a ton of bricks? [23:31.240 --> 23:38.880] Oh, you know that that's where I started my conversation with the victim's mother. [23:38.880 --> 23:43.560] And yes, there's going to be a landing like a ton of bricks. [23:43.560 --> 23:49.920] The attorney having made the argument that the record needed to be sealed because it [23:49.920 --> 23:54.520] left a one-sided presentation to the public that was misleading. [23:54.520 --> 24:03.040] And he also said that he worked very hard on the case and that's why it should be sealed. [24:03.040 --> 24:09.800] I don't believe that's a meritorious argument to go against the jurisprudence that goes [24:09.800 --> 24:16.320] so far back and so strongly that the court was to provide candles so that the record [24:16.320 --> 24:18.440] can be seen. [24:18.440 --> 24:21.720] He's going to get a bar grievance on that. [24:21.720 --> 24:22.720] Wonderful. [24:22.720 --> 24:29.000] He's already gotten. [24:29.000 --> 24:36.440] What's also interesting is LinkedIn, I'm seeing suddenly a bunch of hits with people looking [24:36.440 --> 24:46.860] at the profiles, especially about the time the, because it takes the bar grievance group [24:46.860 --> 24:50.520] about a week after they send you the initial letter. [24:50.520 --> 25:02.280] So I'm guessing that the sudden interest in my profile is tied to the bar grievances. [25:02.280 --> 25:07.040] You know, they're not going to send you any Christmas cards. [25:07.040 --> 25:09.080] You understand that. [25:09.080 --> 25:11.840] Everything has consequences, you know. [25:11.840 --> 25:13.240] Oh, yes. [25:13.240 --> 25:22.520] I think that this is not the first criminal case where my paperwork shows up in. [25:22.520 --> 25:29.840] It took them three months to just finally file some of my paperwork in the criminal [25:29.840 --> 25:41.720] case that was tied to the 968 request under 968.01 to have a judge witness the signing [25:41.720 --> 25:44.340] of a criminal complaint. [25:44.340 --> 25:51.000] It took them three months to then file it in the same person's criminal case that had [25:51.000 --> 25:53.560] nothing to do with my criminal complaint. [25:53.560 --> 26:00.400] My criminal complaint was about this man swindling a 64-year-old man out of his house. [26:00.400 --> 26:06.460] The criminal case in question was a identity theft credit card case. [26:06.460 --> 26:14.560] So how a criminal complaint of elder abuse gets filed in a credit card fraud case three [26:14.560 --> 26:23.140] months after the paperwork was sent, it smells of a setup to me in that they want to be able [26:23.140 --> 26:27.800] to paint me in some future way of something. [26:27.800 --> 26:38.200] The problem with criminal complaints is you are absolutely protected. [26:38.200 --> 26:40.240] They start to come after you on that one. [26:40.240 --> 26:43.640] They will have a serious problem. [26:43.640 --> 26:45.640] Yeah. [26:45.640 --> 26:50.720] That's probably why they've gone and done nothing about it otherwise. [26:50.720 --> 26:51.720] Yeah. [26:51.720 --> 26:58.040] They would be stepping into really deep doo-doo if they messed with that because the police [26:58.040 --> 27:11.480] and everybody wants the public to cooperate and assist them in their fighting crime. [27:11.480 --> 27:13.000] The police know they can't do it all. [27:13.000 --> 27:19.000] That's why a witness is absolutely protected. [27:19.000 --> 27:21.800] The only thing you're not protected against is aggravated perjury. [27:21.800 --> 27:30.360] As long as you tell the truth, you're absolutely protected and a criminal complaintant has [27:30.360 --> 27:35.760] the same immunity that a judge has. [27:35.760 --> 27:43.040] So if they try to come after you, if they do anything, you're a witness. [27:43.040 --> 27:48.480] That's witness tampering and obstruction. [27:48.480 --> 27:53.680] So unlikely, if you... Go ahead. [27:53.680 --> 28:00.000] It should also be able to kick something on the federal level with the Ku Klux Klan Act. [28:00.000 --> 28:01.000] Yeah. [28:01.000 --> 28:07.880] That's 18 U.S.... It depends on how you want to use the Ku Klux Klan Act. [28:07.880 --> 28:19.440] For those who don't know, 18 U.S. Code 242 and 42 U.S. Code 1983, both of those are the [28:19.440 --> 28:21.480] Ku Klux Klan Act. [28:21.480 --> 28:28.520] The first part of the Ku Klux Klan Act is 18 U.S. Code 242, which makes it a crime for [28:28.520 --> 28:34.720] a public official to exert or purport to exert an authority he does not expressly have. [28:34.720 --> 28:41.960] The second part was... This was passed in 1871. [28:41.960 --> 28:49.040] After the Civil War, during the Reconstruction, they left all of the sheriffs and constables [28:49.040 --> 28:54.480] and mayors in place in the South so that they didn't wind up with anarchy and gave them [28:54.480 --> 28:55.480] new instructions. [28:55.480 --> 29:01.640] Well, these hillbillies down here told those Yankee carpet baggers to go scratch. [29:01.640 --> 29:04.560] We'll do what we want to. [29:04.560 --> 29:12.800] In 1871, they passed the Ku Klux Klan Act, which made it a crime for public officials [29:12.800 --> 29:19.480] to fail to perform their duty or to exert or purport to exert an authority they don't [29:19.480 --> 29:26.080] have, and also made them personally liable by lawsuit, 42 U.S. Code 1983. [29:26.080 --> 29:29.880] Am I correcting all of that, Mark, or did I miss anything? [29:29.880 --> 29:35.720] I believe you are functionally correct, and we have another break. [29:35.720 --> 29:41.080] I'm glad you can hear that music, because I sure can. [29:41.080 --> 29:43.960] I keep running off the clips. [29:43.960 --> 29:45.800] You're a better host than I am. [29:45.800 --> 29:48.640] This is Randy Kelton, the Rule of Law Radio. [29:48.640 --> 29:53.000] I call in number 512-646-1984. [29:53.000 --> 30:00.360] We'll be right back. [30:00.360 --> 30:26.320] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back to tell you why some burn victims are turning [30:26.320 --> 30:31.800] out to vanish, too, so protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information [30:31.800 --> 30:32.800] to yourself. [30:32.800 --> 30:35.440] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:35.440 --> 30:39.740] This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com, the private search [30:39.740 --> 30:43.280] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:43.280 --> 30:46.280] Start over with Startpage. [30:46.280 --> 30:50.120] My friend Liz burned her arm in a cast iron pan the other day. [30:50.120 --> 30:51.120] Ouch. [30:51.120 --> 30:54.920] She ran cold water over the burn, but the pain remained, plus she was concerned about [30:54.920 --> 30:55.920] blisters. [30:55.920 --> 30:57.680] So she turned to the Internet for advice. [30:57.680 --> 31:02.840] There she stumbled on a seemingly crazy home remedy suggested by the People's Pharmacy, [31:02.840 --> 31:04.520] cold yellow mustard. [31:04.520 --> 31:07.600] She applied mustard to the burn, and the pain stopped right away. [31:07.600 --> 31:12.960] Then she bandaged the area, and the next day she was pain-free with no blisters. [31:12.960 --> 31:17.400] Serious burns require a trip to the doctor or the hospital, but for minor burns, you [31:17.400 --> 31:19.840] might want to give common yellow mustard a try. [31:19.840 --> 31:20.840] It seems to work. [31:20.840 --> 31:22.840] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [31:22.840 --> 31:30.520] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:30.520 --> 31:34.880] Did you know there are three million edible food plants on earth, and none have the nutritional [31:34.880 --> 31:36.600] value of a hemp plant? [31:36.600 --> 31:39.080] HempUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder. [31:39.080 --> 31:45.000] It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100% gluten-free. [31:45.000 --> 31:50.240] Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein, and feeds the body the [31:50.240 --> 31:51.240] nutrients it needs. [31:51.240 --> 32:02.120] Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at HempUSA.org. [32:02.120 --> 32:04.880] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar. [32:04.880 --> 32:08.680] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, and if we the people are ever going [32:08.680 --> 32:12.280] to have a free society, then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:12.280 --> 32:15.840] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, the right to act [32:15.840 --> 32:19.880] in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:19.880 --> 32:24.160] The courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights [32:24.160 --> 32:25.160] through due process. [32:25.160 --> 32:29.120] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, has put together the [32:29.120 --> 32:32.880] most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process [32:32.880 --> 32:34.960] is and how to hold the courts to the rule of law. [32:34.960 --> 32:39.280] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and [32:39.280 --> 32:40.600] ordering your copy today. [32:40.600 --> 32:43.800] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, [32:43.800 --> 32:48.360] The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research [32:48.360 --> 32:50.200] documents and other useful resource material. [32:50.200 --> 32:53.920] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:53.920 --> 33:23.600] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:24.600 --> 33:30.240] Okay, we are back. [33:30.240 --> 33:33.680] Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin. [33:33.680 --> 33:37.720] Let's see if I can get you unmuted. [33:37.720 --> 33:38.720] There we go. [33:38.720 --> 33:39.720] Okay. [33:39.720 --> 33:41.720] Go ahead, Mark. [33:41.720 --> 33:42.720] Okay. [33:42.720 --> 33:51.560] So, having found the allies and all that, it made life a whole lot easier to get this [33:51.560 --> 34:01.920] judge to follow the, shoot down this attorney's attempt. [34:01.920 --> 34:11.120] Ultimately, the DA, she spent a lot of time complaining that she was going to have to [34:11.120 --> 34:19.240] do more work in the case and it seems her entire reason for going along with the proposed [34:19.240 --> 34:24.440] closing off of the record entirely is now she has to go through and do some work sorting [34:24.440 --> 34:25.440] through the record. [34:25.440 --> 34:34.400] So, that's going to be some interesting, I'm going to just ask for points of authority [34:34.400 --> 34:41.520] from the head district attorney knowing he has no obligation whatsoever to give me any [34:41.520 --> 34:49.760] reason as to why they went ahead and we're going to go with closing this record. [34:49.760 --> 34:58.200] Yeah, but you get to say we asked him why he wanted to do it and he refused to tell [34:58.200 --> 34:59.200] us. [34:59.200 --> 35:00.200] Yeah. [35:00.200 --> 35:06.760] All political and perception is everything. [35:06.760 --> 35:09.520] That's right. [35:09.520 --> 35:13.960] That's actually Ken's first rule, his perception is everything. [35:13.960 --> 35:21.840] Oh yes, the optics in this really suck for these people. [35:21.840 --> 35:28.600] I've also been taking a playbook out of your playbook of asking for public record. [35:28.600 --> 35:34.040] They've now gotten to the point where they no longer respond to my request for public [35:34.040 --> 35:42.520] records and so I've got to let that run its course and make sure if the only valid [35:42.520 --> 35:48.840] requests are in writing and mailed, I've got to look at that, but the emailed request they've [35:48.840 --> 35:52.240] just stopped responding to at this point. [35:52.240 --> 35:57.040] Did you file criminally against them for each one? [35:57.040 --> 36:02.440] Not yet because I don't have mastered Wisconsin's public record law. [36:02.440 --> 36:12.360] But they spent their time going ahead and making my life difficult and making sure that [36:12.360 --> 36:20.520] they wanted me out of the county and so I'm out of the county just like they wanted. [36:20.520 --> 36:23.920] I'm sure it'll work out for them. [36:23.920 --> 36:26.800] What else? [36:26.800 --> 36:29.520] That didn't make sense. [36:29.520 --> 36:36.360] Oh, they had the chief or the second command of the building inspection code slap a condemnation [36:36.360 --> 36:42.400] notice on my house and then said to my face, oh, I did that to send you a message. [36:42.400 --> 36:48.400] Oh, did you send him a message? [36:48.400 --> 36:53.120] Well I attempted to, you see that's when I attempted to talk with the district attorney [36:53.120 --> 37:01.400] to charge him with the only violation is explicitly says the condemnation notices have to go through [37:01.400 --> 37:04.600] a process, which of course he never did. [37:04.600 --> 37:14.560] And the district attorney blew me off to be polite as to what happened there. [37:14.560 --> 37:20.560] And I'm taking a playbook or I'm taking a page out of the playbook. [37:20.560 --> 37:31.480] There is a decision that going ahead and filing in a timely manner in our federal district, [37:31.480 --> 37:39.240] filing in a timely manner against the judge is not a barrier to a suit because of the [37:39.240 --> 37:43.160] risk of retaliation from the judge. [37:43.160 --> 37:52.560] And so once the judge had resigned, then this person sued in my particular case, I'm no [37:52.560 --> 37:54.360] longer in the county. [37:54.360 --> 37:58.440] And so I'm going to now and have no property interest in the county. [37:58.440 --> 38:03.760] So then I'm going to make the same kind of claim about the second in command. [38:03.760 --> 38:08.160] Yeah, that's a case law out of Chicago. [38:08.160 --> 38:09.160] I believe so. [38:09.160 --> 38:16.600] Yeah, we had a judge there who was very corrupt and the courts ruled that someone after he [38:16.600 --> 38:19.520] retired, somebody sued him or he was removed from office. [38:19.520 --> 38:24.640] Then he was sued and he claimed they couldn't and because of statute limitations. [38:24.640 --> 38:32.440] And they said, no, the fact that he was still in office made it so that it was the risk [38:32.440 --> 38:34.760] of retaliation was too great. [38:34.760 --> 38:40.560] So if you're a public official, then you're in a position of authority. [38:40.560 --> 38:48.160] Your bad deeds follow you until you get out of office, wonderful. [38:48.160 --> 38:50.880] Yeah. [38:50.880 --> 38:55.800] So that's been going on. [38:55.800 --> 38:56.800] What else? [38:56.800 --> 39:04.720] Getting the politics lined up has certainly made this much more interesting. [39:04.720 --> 39:09.920] One attorney in this thing was asking whether or not I was a failed law student and this [39:09.920 --> 39:18.240] is just some kind of disgruntled law student. [39:18.240 --> 39:24.760] So did you get a final determination on this expungement issue? [39:24.760 --> 39:26.200] Not at all. [39:26.200 --> 39:31.960] The judge is willing to seal some of the records because apparently there are things involving [39:31.960 --> 39:39.160] grades, child mental health, child medical records. [39:39.160 --> 39:43.280] But that's going to be a different... [39:43.280 --> 39:48.840] Those records would be secret as a matter of law anyway, would they not? [39:48.840 --> 39:49.840] Yes. [39:49.840 --> 39:54.400] But then the question is, is why didn't they get filed that way? [39:54.400 --> 40:01.000] Then that's going to be a question I ask the DA as to why their employee didn't file that [40:01.000 --> 40:06.040] stuff as secret to begin with. [40:06.040 --> 40:16.360] So they took records that would damage the child and put those in the open record when [40:16.360 --> 40:23.000] the child, they're not only medical records, but they're also of a juvenile, which should [40:23.000 --> 40:30.520] by statute, I haven't seen Wisconsin statute, but certainly Texas statute, it's secret. [40:30.520 --> 40:40.960] And they make what should be secret information open when it applies to the victim, but want [40:40.960 --> 40:48.280] to change and hold the accused to a different standard because he's a lawyer. [40:48.280 --> 40:52.920] Well, it's quite possible they did things differently. [40:52.920 --> 40:54.520] Certainly because it's a lawyer. [40:54.520 --> 41:00.680] It also helps that in this particular instance with this particular lawyer, I've met him [41:00.680 --> 41:07.560] at parties and he admitted at one party that he did get a special deal on one of his previous [41:07.560 --> 41:11.240] cases to keep his law license. [41:11.240 --> 41:17.400] And also in Wisconsin, there's a gentleman who's practicing law, still practicing law. [41:17.400 --> 41:23.600] He actually killed somebody while drunk driving and they said, yeah, okay, fine. [41:23.600 --> 41:26.640] We acknowledge that you did this, that was dumb of you. [41:26.640 --> 41:29.520] And they're letting him still practice law. [41:29.520 --> 41:36.280] Well, he must know the right folks. [41:36.280 --> 41:39.960] That is also a possibility. [41:39.960 --> 41:48.040] And as far as the politics with the judicial reform, I wanted to point out a Thursday, [41:48.040 --> 41:57.320] November 19th, 2015 memorandum from the DCCC, which is Democratic something, something, [41:57.320 --> 41:59.760] something party. [41:59.760 --> 42:07.280] And it's part of the leaks by the Guccifer II individual where they discuss Black Lives [42:07.280 --> 42:13.720] Matter, bullet point number two on background, criminal justice system reform, sentencing [42:13.720 --> 42:19.400] reform and in prison, industrial complex, police reform, referring to hiring training [42:19.400 --> 42:22.640] on the fair policing tactics. [42:22.640 --> 42:31.040] It sounds like for a few of the bullet points of a few of the shows on your network, there [42:31.040 --> 42:37.000] would be some allies within that movement. [42:37.000 --> 42:44.320] But I have no idea how to reach them to get court watchers. [42:44.320 --> 42:55.880] I've tried to reach groups like this and they seem to always be headed by some figure. [42:55.880 --> 43:03.720] And that figure always wants to be in control and I never have been able to get them to [43:03.720 --> 43:12.880] look outside the parameters of what they've already decided they want to do and what they [43:12.880 --> 43:13.880] intend to do. [43:13.880 --> 43:23.240] I've been real disappointed trying to get people in the community to spread out and [43:23.240 --> 43:24.240] work with one another. [43:24.240 --> 43:26.360] It's been real disappointing. [43:26.360 --> 43:36.400] Yeah, I've not seen, given that this is also nearly a year old and we've got the break. [43:36.400 --> 43:37.400] Okay. [43:37.400 --> 43:38.400] Hang on. [43:38.400 --> 43:46.440] This is Randy Kalkin, Rudy Bell Radio, our caller number 512-606-1984. [43:46.440 --> 43:52.600] We've got three callers, four callers on the line, but three more and we have a first time [43:52.600 --> 43:59.600] caller, we'll pick him up when we get done with Mark and we'll be right back. [43:59.600 --> 44:08.120] Hello, my name is Stuart Smith from natures-true-organics.com and I would like to invite you to come by our [44:08.120 --> 44:12.240] store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D here in Austin, Texas. [44:12.240 --> 44:16.240] I'm Brave New Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products [44:16.240 --> 44:17.240] with your very own eyes. [44:17.240 --> 44:22.320] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [44:22.320 --> 44:26.600] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil, [44:26.600 --> 44:30.320] lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [44:30.320 --> 44:43.160] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at natures-pure-organics.com, that's 512-264-4043, natures-pure-organics.com. [44:43.160 --> 45:01.280] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, natures-pure-organics.com. [45:01.280 --> 45:04.480] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:04.480 --> 45:09.720] Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy to understand [45:09.720 --> 45:14.320] 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [45:14.320 --> 45:18.960] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:18.960 --> 45:23.240] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.240 --> 45:28.120] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:28.120 --> 45:34.880] Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.880 --> 45:39.440] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the [45:39.440 --> 45:43.720] principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.720 --> 45:49.920] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.920 --> 45:52.200] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.200 --> 45:59.920] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [45:59.920 --> 46:22.440] Okay. [46:22.440 --> 46:23.440] We are back. [46:23.440 --> 46:27.720] Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Mark in Wisconsin. [46:27.720 --> 46:32.040] Mark, do you have anything else for us? [46:32.040 --> 46:39.920] Not really, just a reminder of the importance of getting a handle on what the case law is [46:39.920 --> 46:42.720] before you draft up your issues. [46:42.720 --> 46:48.680] But in theory, that's why you hire an attorney who, if you had an attorney and were going [46:48.680 --> 46:53.760] to go that route, you'd hire an attorney who practices in that area, they'd already have [46:53.760 --> 46:55.640] a handle on it. [46:55.640 --> 47:04.360] And unfortunately for the pro se, we kind of got to get up to speed before we step into [47:04.360 --> 47:05.360] the ring. [47:05.360 --> 47:06.360] Exactly. [47:06.360 --> 47:10.280] We have a lot of plagiarizing to do. [47:10.280 --> 47:11.280] You bet. [47:11.280 --> 47:19.320] Although, as I pointed out to you in a separate email, a courtroom had ruled that plagiarism [47:19.320 --> 47:22.480] of a court case was a problem. [47:22.480 --> 47:34.080] Yeah, but in that case, it was lawyer to lawyer where a one lawyer, both lawyers were filing [47:34.080 --> 47:39.280] a document in the same case on the same issue. [47:39.280 --> 47:45.800] And the second lawyer took the first lawyer's work and plagiarized it and preempted it. [47:45.800 --> 47:52.880] That was different than taking a pleading from one case and filing it in another case. [47:52.880 --> 48:01.960] So it wasn't, while it was reasonable, the lawyer was really a chump. [48:01.960 --> 48:09.840] We have good case law on the fact that once you file something in the record, then it's [48:09.840 --> 48:18.280] public and the position in that article that they didn't address was that the lawyer plagiarized [48:18.280 --> 48:23.360] this work before it became public. [48:23.360 --> 48:32.280] This was a work product that the lawyer plagiarized, not a public filing. [48:32.280 --> 48:38.080] So I didn't see that issue brought up, but once it's in the public record, neither one [48:38.080 --> 48:43.800] of them would have anything to say over taking what was there and reciting. [48:43.800 --> 48:51.400] As a matter of fact, if you're a lawyer, you want other people to use your work. [48:51.400 --> 48:53.400] Makes you look better. [48:53.400 --> 49:01.640] Yeah, well, and one of the things in our last call where we were discussing whether or not [49:01.640 --> 49:06.040] the judge had jurisdiction once one of the parties was dead. [49:06.040 --> 49:08.280] In fact, the judge brought that up. [49:08.280 --> 49:16.360] Now, I don't know if he read my stuff and did a bit of research or, you know, if he [49:16.360 --> 49:18.600] had that without reading it. [49:18.600 --> 49:25.600] But given that I got a call from his clerk, I'm guessing my stuff got read. [49:25.600 --> 49:26.600] Wonderful. [49:26.600 --> 49:37.600] Well, I suspect that you have a reputation to the point that they understand you're not [49:37.600 --> 49:46.000] just some flake that the pro se that's filing junk pleadings. [49:46.000 --> 49:51.880] Well, that would be one of the interesting points. [49:51.880 --> 49:58.560] My reputation apparently started when the electric company withdrew a lawsuit versus [49:58.560 --> 50:00.280] me. [50:00.280 --> 50:06.240] And the clerks came out in a group and said, we have to see this person. [50:06.240 --> 50:12.280] We've never seen the electric company withdraw a suit. [50:12.280 --> 50:16.000] And I was like, okay. [50:16.000 --> 50:23.000] The other thing is I know there are so these people of work, humans are social animals. [50:23.000 --> 50:30.040] And so I usually try to find something in the pleading, taking a page from your I do [50:30.040 --> 50:38.120] not consent to hypnotism comment that you had in the case, I always try to fill in something [50:38.120 --> 50:45.040] that's just a little absurd, such that their tongues will wag. [50:45.040 --> 50:47.760] So yeah, I do remember that. [50:47.760 --> 50:49.760] That was great fun. [50:49.760 --> 50:50.760] Yeah. [50:50.760 --> 51:03.440] The last one I had was to make a point about the lack of the dead man's voice in the court. [51:03.440 --> 51:10.920] I stated that Wisconsin would have a problem, paraphrasing here, there would be a definite [51:10.920 --> 51:17.920] state's rights issue with Wisconsin importing Chicago voting technology that would then [51:17.920 --> 51:20.560] allow this dead man to have a voice. [51:20.560 --> 51:21.960] To have a say. [51:21.960 --> 51:22.960] That's good. [51:22.960 --> 51:23.960] Yeah. [51:23.960 --> 51:31.440] I figured that would be enough for them to go, oh, look at this wacky thing. [51:31.440 --> 51:36.360] It's good to get them to chuckle on occasion. [51:36.360 --> 51:48.400] I just filed an appeal in the New York second district in D.C. from a New York case. [51:48.400 --> 51:53.240] And I'm talking about how we don't know who the real holder is. [51:53.240 --> 52:00.360] And I took this Abbott and Costello routine, who's on first, what's on second, and I don't [52:00.360 --> 52:06.720] care if it's shortstop, all of these terms fit perfect, and I was able to walk through [52:06.720 --> 52:10.320] the brief using that. [52:10.320 --> 52:17.520] Those are the kind of things that get your attention ready, you mean for it to or not. [52:17.520 --> 52:27.960] The apparently the U.S. DOJ for the region, she pulled me aside on one particular thing [52:27.960 --> 52:34.080] and said that my filings were a bit glib. [52:34.080 --> 52:36.080] You do have a style. [52:36.080 --> 52:37.080] Yes. [52:37.080 --> 52:39.120] Yes, I do. [52:39.120 --> 52:43.200] And I explained to her, I said, oh, what you read was the toned down copy. [52:43.200 --> 52:46.360] You should have seen what was there originally. [52:46.360 --> 52:47.680] Okay. [52:47.680 --> 52:50.000] We need to move along. [52:50.000 --> 52:52.640] We've got a whole board full of callers. [52:52.640 --> 52:53.640] Thank you, Mark. [52:53.640 --> 52:55.640] And don't be a stranger. [52:55.640 --> 52:58.040] I'll try not. [52:58.040 --> 52:59.040] Bye-bye. [52:59.040 --> 53:00.040] Okay. [53:00.040 --> 53:03.040] Now we're going to go to Jeff in Florida. [53:03.040 --> 53:05.160] Jeff is a first-time caller. [53:05.160 --> 53:06.520] Hello, Jeff. [53:06.520 --> 53:08.920] What do you have for us today? [53:08.920 --> 53:11.040] Hello, Randy. [53:11.040 --> 53:13.200] I emailed you last night. [53:13.200 --> 53:20.680] I believe last week sometime in that frame, my calendar is a bit messed up at the moment [53:20.680 --> 53:27.240] about my expired driver's license and how I went to a lovely little trial and it happened [53:27.240 --> 53:30.360] just like Eddie said it would happen. [53:30.360 --> 53:33.800] They threw me under the bus. [53:33.800 --> 53:35.280] Okay. [53:35.280 --> 53:42.400] Do you have them set up for what you do next? [53:42.400 --> 53:45.160] Well, exactly. [53:45.160 --> 53:46.800] What do I do next? [53:46.800 --> 53:49.120] The lawyer did bind me up. [53:49.120 --> 53:54.640] I filed a motion, it got stricken from the record because I had a lawyer who actually [53:54.640 --> 53:56.640] objected to it. [53:56.640 --> 53:57.640] He objected to it. [53:57.640 --> 54:02.600] The judge overruled his objection and stricken it from the record instead. [54:02.600 --> 54:04.440] Only the attorney can object. [54:04.440 --> 54:12.000] Now when we went to an adjournment in the conference room, I asked him why he was not [54:12.000 --> 54:16.360] doing his job to properly adjudicate the case. [54:16.360 --> 54:19.240] What sort of a defense are you mounting, sir? [54:19.240 --> 54:20.240] There is no defense. [54:20.240 --> 54:25.400] It's either expired or it's not, was what he told me. [54:25.400 --> 54:29.240] So he sues a lawyer for malpractice. [54:29.240 --> 54:34.840] Here we go, malpractice. [54:34.840 --> 54:35.840] Okay. [54:35.840 --> 54:43.560] If you go to a lawyer with a legal issue, first thing he's going to do is look for deep [54:43.560 --> 54:44.560] pockets. [54:44.560 --> 54:50.920] Well, the lawyer has deep pockets. [54:50.920 --> 54:58.720] The state of Florida provides the errors and omissions policies for lawyers there as I [54:58.720 --> 55:00.960] understand. [55:00.960 --> 55:09.960] So all of these lawyers are going to be covered by their own state bar and this is similar [55:09.960 --> 55:10.960] to Australia. [55:10.960 --> 55:26.200] In Australia, the law society is the oversight entity for lawyers and every lawyer is part [55:26.200 --> 55:35.640] of his dues to the law society, pays into a fund and this fund is used as an errors [55:35.640 --> 55:37.800] and omissions policy. [55:37.800 --> 55:40.640] Florida seems to be similar. [55:40.640 --> 55:48.420] If you get sued in Australia, the law society is not going to be happy with you because [55:48.420 --> 55:57.800] they take this fund and they use it to invest in various different things and you get into [55:57.800 --> 56:02.720] their fund, they're going to be real unhappy with you. [56:02.720 --> 56:10.720] So you sue the lawyer or at least have you bar grieved your attorney? [56:10.720 --> 56:13.160] No, I have not. [56:13.160 --> 56:20.400] The case was fairly new and I am going to report on Tuesday to the probation officer [56:20.400 --> 56:22.600] to start my jail sentence. [56:22.600 --> 56:23.600] Okay. [56:23.600 --> 56:32.880] Have you filed an appeal? [56:32.880 --> 56:36.880] Hello, are you there? [56:36.880 --> 56:37.880] Hello? [56:37.880 --> 56:38.880] Yeah, hello. [56:38.880 --> 56:39.880] Have you filed an appeal? [56:39.880 --> 56:45.960] No, I am still within the realm of appeal. [56:45.960 --> 56:47.640] Okay. [56:47.640 --> 56:56.040] I would suggest, okay, the last case similar to that that I was in, it wasn't traffic, [56:56.040 --> 57:03.640] it was, what did they charge me with, resisting arrest, I believe, it's where the officer [57:03.640 --> 57:11.040] smashed my face into a wall and broke out one of my teeth when I told him what part [57:11.040 --> 57:18.200] of I do not want to talk to you is hard for you to understand. [57:18.200 --> 57:23.520] That I had called 911 on them and was waiting for the Austin Police Department to come and [57:23.520 --> 57:26.680] take my complaint against them. [57:26.680 --> 57:35.960] Well, they dismissed my case to protect my lawyer from me. [57:35.960 --> 57:44.360] So if you already have a conviction, then you need to get the appeal in and I would [57:44.360 --> 57:52.600] suggest that if you had legal issues that your lawyer refused to adjudicate, the first [57:52.600 --> 57:58.320] thing you do is bargain with your lawyer and then give him notice of tort of your intent [57:58.320 --> 58:00.320] to sue for malpractice. [58:00.320 --> 58:04.920] Okay, let me step back a second. [58:04.920 --> 58:12.760] Before you got a lawyer, had you filed anything in the record, any motions or grievance? [58:12.760 --> 58:21.560] Yes, I filed a motion for jurisdiction, both subject matter and in personam, but there [58:21.560 --> 58:30.640] was some sort of, it's fairly hilarious, the notes were filed and not the actual challenge, [58:30.640 --> 58:33.840] not the actual motion. [58:33.840 --> 58:36.320] That makes it more difficult. [58:36.320 --> 58:39.360] Okay, you needed something in the record. [58:39.360 --> 58:41.640] I'll explain it when I come back. [58:41.640 --> 58:50.280] Radio, radio, we'll be right back. [58:50.280 --> 58:54.440] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? [58:54.440 --> 58:59.600] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that [58:59.600 --> 59:00.960] can really help. [59:00.960 --> 59:05.440] The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available [59:05.440 --> 59:06.440] today. [59:06.440 --> 59:10.320] It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you [59:10.320 --> 59:13.440] to know God and to know the meaning of life. [59:13.440 --> 59:18.680] The free books are a three volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:18.680 --> 59:22.960] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan [59:22.960 --> 59:27.880] of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church. [59:27.880 --> 59:32.920] To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian [59:32.920 --> 59:40.680] Life, call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. [59:40.680 --> 59:48.640] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [59:48.640 --> 01:00:02.640] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:02.640 --> 01:00:07.720] The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily [01:00:07.720 --> 01:00:15.440] bulletins for the commodity market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop [01:00:15.440 --> 01:00:23.280] into the tides of the alternative. [01:00:23.280 --> 01:00:29.480] Markets for Wednesday, September 21st, 2016 are currently trading with gold at $1,336.62 [01:00:29.480 --> 01:00:36.280] an ounce, silver $19.78 an ounce, Texas crude $43.44 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently [01:00:36.280 --> 01:00:44.720] sitting at about $600 US currency. [01:00:44.720 --> 01:00:49.840] Today in history, the year 1981, Sandra Day O'Connor is unanimously approved by the US [01:00:49.840 --> 01:00:57.720] Senate as the first female Supreme Court Justice, today in history. [01:00:57.720 --> 01:01:02.340] In recent news, Ahmad Kam Rahami, the man sought by state investigators for possible [01:01:02.340 --> 01:01:06.480] connections to the detonating of some explosives in the dumpster in Manhattan, on a route in [01:01:06.480 --> 01:01:10.660] Seaside Park, New Jersey, and in a backpack which was detonated by police around a train [01:01:10.660 --> 01:01:13.920] station in Elizabeth, got into a shootout with local PD. [01:01:13.920 --> 01:01:17.560] Police and FBI had announced early Monday that they were seeking Rahami in connection [01:01:17.560 --> 01:01:22.160] with the bombings in the Chelsea district, when as Lyndon Police Captain James Sarniki [01:01:22.160 --> 01:01:27.140] told local NBC affiliates, officers were responding to a call about a person sleeping in a doorway [01:01:27.140 --> 01:01:29.520] of a local bar, turned out to be him. [01:01:29.520 --> 01:01:33.280] When approaching, the officers noticed his resemblance to the wanted bulletin, and they [01:01:33.280 --> 01:01:35.400] then ordered him to show his hands. [01:01:35.400 --> 01:01:39.400] Rahami pulled out a handgun and fired a shot at the officer, striking him in the abdomen. [01:01:39.400 --> 01:01:42.720] Luckily, most of the round was stopped by a protective vest. [01:01:42.720 --> 01:01:45.880] The officer returned fire, but Rahami simply walked away. [01:01:45.880 --> 01:01:49.400] He was eventually shot down the street by several police officers, where again shots [01:01:49.400 --> 01:01:50.560] were exchanged. [01:01:50.560 --> 01:01:54.640] He was taken away in an ambulance to University Hospital in Newark, where his condition is [01:01:54.640 --> 01:01:55.640] still unknown. [01:01:55.640 --> 01:02:00.080] We have every reason to believe this was an act of terror, Mayor of New York Bill Belasio [01:02:00.080 --> 01:02:04.280] said in a news conference, also stating that investigators are not seeking any other individuals [01:02:04.280 --> 01:02:05.280] at the moment. [01:02:05.280 --> 01:02:08.640] That is, even though apparently according to the FBI, Rahami's role in the explosives [01:02:08.640 --> 01:02:09.920] remains unknown. [01:02:09.920 --> 01:02:13.360] Even though he was carrying a notebook containing his pro jihadist writings, including a reference [01:02:13.360 --> 01:02:20.640] to the slain al-Qaeda terrorist Anwar al-Waqi, and notes about killing the kufar, or unbeliever, [01:02:20.640 --> 01:02:22.920] as was stated by law enforcement to the Times. [01:02:22.920 --> 01:02:26.860] The FBI didn't disclose whether the five people taken into custody Sunday night and later [01:02:26.860 --> 01:02:32.000] released were linked to Rahami, or how Rahami and his family fit into all of it. [01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:35.800] And it was reported yesterday by the New York Times that his father told authorities two [01:02:35.800 --> 01:02:38.280] years ago that his son was a terrorist. [01:02:38.280 --> 01:02:41.880] As of Monday, Ahmed has been charged with five counts of attempted murder on law enforcement [01:02:41.880 --> 01:02:46.200] officers and two second-degree counts of his ownership of a handgun. [01:02:46.200 --> 01:03:15.880] Still has been said at 5.2 million by State Superior Judge. [01:03:15.880 --> 01:03:16.880] We are back. [01:03:16.880 --> 01:03:21.680] Randy Kelton, Rue La Radio, and we're talking to Jeff in Florida. [01:03:21.680 --> 01:03:29.880] Jeff, is this your first conviction on an offense of this type? [01:03:29.880 --> 01:03:32.480] It's my first conviction on anything. [01:03:32.480 --> 01:03:33.480] Anything. [01:03:33.480 --> 01:03:34.480] Okay. [01:03:34.480 --> 01:03:42.160] What did they give you? [01:03:42.160 --> 01:03:44.680] I don't know what you mean by give me. [01:03:44.680 --> 01:03:46.120] What was the sentence? [01:03:46.120 --> 01:03:50.880] You said you were speaking to a probation officer. [01:03:50.880 --> 01:03:54.280] Yes, it was six months probation. [01:03:54.280 --> 01:03:58.160] I forgot the sheet right here. [01:03:58.160 --> 01:04:06.040] So that's the six months probation, 75 days of community service, and a $600 fine. [01:04:06.040 --> 01:04:07.040] Wow. [01:04:07.040 --> 01:04:11.280] They see the book at you. [01:04:11.280 --> 01:04:13.240] Okay. [01:04:13.240 --> 01:04:24.360] I'm uncomfortable with the, I get a lot of people with this particular issue, and while [01:04:24.360 --> 01:04:32.080] I do challenge the right to travel, they don't want people going to jail for it. [01:04:32.080 --> 01:04:41.960] I have a driver's license, but I also am registered with the Department of Transportation as a [01:04:41.960 --> 01:04:47.680] private operator, not in commerce. [01:04:47.680 --> 01:04:56.040] So first thing happens when an officer pulls me over is I ask them to check their computer, [01:04:56.040 --> 01:05:01.760] check with the DOT, run my name on the DOT, and almost every time they come back and give [01:05:01.760 --> 01:05:10.160] me a warning because they find my name in the DOT as a private operator. [01:05:10.160 --> 01:05:16.800] I am concerned with so many people having these issues over no driver's license. [01:05:16.800 --> 01:05:19.600] There's another way to fight it. [01:05:19.600 --> 01:05:26.560] With that said, have you filed a motion for a new trial? [01:05:26.560 --> 01:05:29.160] No, I have not. [01:05:29.160 --> 01:05:32.800] My attorney is blocking every motion. [01:05:32.800 --> 01:05:33.800] Fire him. [01:05:33.800 --> 01:05:34.800] He. [01:05:34.800 --> 01:05:45.280] Fire him and file a motion for a new trial for lack of adequate counsel. [01:05:45.280 --> 01:05:48.840] Did you hire this lawyer or was he appointed? [01:05:48.840 --> 01:05:49.840] Appointed. [01:05:49.840 --> 01:05:52.160] Oh, perfect. [01:05:52.160 --> 01:06:00.640] Fire the lawyer and file a motion for a new trial for lack of adequate counsel, bar-grieve [01:06:00.640 --> 01:06:07.760] your lawyer, and then sue him for malpractice, and then ask the court to appoint you new [01:06:07.760 --> 01:06:09.960] counsel. [01:06:09.960 --> 01:06:20.800] That is not going to make them happy. [01:06:20.800 --> 01:06:28.080] Once you, once you fire the lawyer, as soon as you fire the lawyer, then you have your [01:06:28.080 --> 01:06:31.120] motions ready, file all your motions. [01:06:31.120 --> 01:06:36.440] Is your, has your lawyer, was he not going to file a motion for new trial? [01:06:36.440 --> 01:06:41.600] No, he has said that he is not going to do anything at this point. [01:06:41.600 --> 01:06:42.600] Good. [01:06:42.600 --> 01:06:43.600] You're convicted. [01:06:43.600 --> 01:06:45.600] You're guilty next. [01:06:45.600 --> 01:06:46.600] Bar-grieving? [01:06:46.600 --> 01:06:54.160] Because his job is to ensure that you have no grounds for appeal. [01:06:54.160 --> 01:07:00.320] That's what the court pays him for, not to adjudicate your case, but to make sure you [01:07:00.320 --> 01:07:02.200] have no grounds for appeal. [01:07:02.200 --> 01:07:11.280] So bar-grieving first and then notice the court that you fired your attorney and ask [01:07:11.280 --> 01:07:22.720] for a new trial for because of lack of adequate counsel. [01:07:22.720 --> 01:07:29.000] The adjudic are not in their shorts. [01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:33.120] Now they're likely to deny it, but you don't care because then you appeal for lack of adequate [01:07:33.120 --> 01:07:34.120] counsel. [01:07:34.120 --> 01:07:39.240] That all these issues you wanted the lawyer to bring, you bring them to the court of appeals [01:07:39.240 --> 01:07:42.840] to show that you did not have adequate counsel. [01:07:42.840 --> 01:07:44.200] Wonderful. [01:07:44.200 --> 01:07:51.200] I suggest you sue this lawyer for malpractice because now they're going to have to appoint [01:07:51.200 --> 01:07:57.160] you another lawyer and the new lawyer is not going to be a happy camper. [01:07:57.160 --> 01:08:03.800] Now you've got the lawyer in a position to where he will have plausible deniability. [01:08:03.800 --> 01:08:05.320] I am in the courtroom. [01:08:05.320 --> 01:08:12.520] Well, first thing I did, I went to call me into court and when the judge called me up, [01:08:12.520 --> 01:08:18.040] I said, your honor, I have this notice to be in court, but it doesn't say why I'm here. [01:08:18.040 --> 01:08:20.760] You want to tell me what I'm doing here? [01:08:20.760 --> 01:08:24.800] Well, Mr. Kelton, we need to find out if you had a lawyer. [01:08:24.800 --> 01:08:29.240] I said, your honor, under 28.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, there are a number [01:08:29.240 --> 01:08:34.520] of things you can order me to come to court for to see if I have a lawyer is not one of [01:08:34.520 --> 01:08:35.840] them. [01:08:35.840 --> 01:08:41.000] Well, this was the ex district attorney's daughter. [01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:42.740] So I figured she's pretty political. [01:08:42.740 --> 01:08:47.720] So I kind of backed off on her and she said, well, Mr. Kelton, we needed to see if you [01:08:47.720 --> 01:08:48.720] have counsel. [01:08:48.720 --> 01:08:51.200] We have a lawyer. [01:08:51.200 --> 01:08:53.900] So I thought, I think I want to keep this judge. [01:08:53.900 --> 01:08:56.400] So I said, no, your honor, I do not. [01:08:56.400 --> 01:08:57.600] Are you going to hire counsel? [01:08:57.600 --> 01:08:59.600] No, I'm not. [01:08:59.600 --> 01:09:01.320] Would you like me to appoint counsel? [01:09:01.320 --> 01:09:02.320] I don't care what you do. [01:09:02.320 --> 01:09:05.120] Well, Mr. Kelton, I'm going to appoint you counsel. [01:09:05.120 --> 01:09:11.440] Well, if you do, your honor, make sure you appoint someone you really don't like. [01:09:11.440 --> 01:09:15.200] And she kind of laughed and said, well, we got an attorney wheel. [01:09:15.200 --> 01:09:17.120] You get the next one off the wheel. [01:09:17.120 --> 01:09:21.280] So this attorney comes out, we go in this room and he says, okay, Mr. Kelton, this is [01:09:21.280 --> 01:09:23.040] how things are going to go. [01:09:23.040 --> 01:09:27.420] I let him rattle on for a while and I said, no, hold on, hold on, hold on. [01:09:27.420 --> 01:09:30.480] That is not how things are going to go. [01:09:30.480 --> 01:09:33.520] He said, well, then how are things going to go then? [01:09:33.520 --> 01:09:34.520] This is how they're going to go. [01:09:34.520 --> 01:09:38.600] You're going to go to the judge and ask the judge to remove you from this case. [01:09:38.600 --> 01:09:42.400] And I'm going to tell the judge, don't you dare remove him from this case. [01:09:42.400 --> 01:09:45.880] He's my counsel of choice and he is under contract. [01:09:45.880 --> 01:09:48.480] And the lawyer said, well, I'm not under contract with you. [01:09:48.480 --> 01:09:49.800] I'm under contract with the state. [01:09:49.800 --> 01:09:54.800] Yes, you are, but I'm the intended third party beneficiary and I have standing on the contract [01:09:54.800 --> 01:09:56.480] and the judge is going to remove you from the case. [01:09:56.480 --> 01:09:58.480] And he said, yes, he would. [01:09:58.480 --> 01:10:02.840] Then I get to sue the judge for interfering with the private contract. [01:10:02.840 --> 01:10:11.320] And the lawyer sat back in his chair and he could see his career flashed before his eyes. [01:10:11.320 --> 01:10:19.640] I bet he told me, if he told me once, he told me 20 times, you're going to get me disbarred. [01:10:19.640 --> 01:10:25.800] So we're in court, the judge, the lawyer and the prosecutor are up at the bench. [01:10:25.800 --> 01:10:27.960] I'm outside the bar. [01:10:27.960 --> 01:10:32.560] My lawyer come to me and said, the prosecutor said she knows who you are and if you start [01:10:32.560 --> 01:10:37.440] filing criminal charges, she's going to charge you with tampering the government document. [01:10:37.440 --> 01:10:39.920] Now I looked over at the prosecutor, she said that, did she? [01:10:39.920 --> 01:10:40.920] Yes, she did. [01:10:40.920 --> 01:10:44.520] I reached in my case and I pulled out 30. [01:10:44.520 --> 01:10:46.200] I said, I got about 30 of them here. [01:10:46.200 --> 01:10:51.560] I need her to come over here and verify these documents in accordance with her duty under [01:10:51.560 --> 01:10:54.320] article 2.06, Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:10:54.320 --> 01:11:00.120] And I pointed at her, you, come here and she kind of backed up against the bench and kind [01:11:00.120 --> 01:11:01.120] of cringed. [01:11:01.120 --> 01:11:03.920] I turned to my lawyer, here, take them. [01:11:03.920 --> 01:11:06.400] He holds up both hands with his palms out. [01:11:06.400 --> 01:11:07.400] I'm not going to touch them. [01:11:07.400 --> 01:11:08.400] I'm not going to touch them. [01:11:08.400 --> 01:11:09.400] Take them, you chicken. [01:11:09.400 --> 01:11:14.360] I did this in front of the judge. [01:11:14.360 --> 01:11:20.680] When I called the lawyer a chicken for not taking the complaints, the judge picked up [01:11:20.680 --> 01:11:25.920] his gavel and called a recess for lunch. [01:11:25.920 --> 01:11:33.260] Before I could get my burrito, my lawyer called me and told me they had dismissed the case. [01:11:33.260 --> 01:11:39.480] They dismissed my case to protect my lawyer from me. [01:11:39.480 --> 01:11:43.560] Jeff, do you understand how that works? [01:11:43.560 --> 01:11:45.320] I do. [01:11:45.320 --> 01:11:54.160] They're all got their snouts in the same trough and that lawyer is going to screw everybody [01:11:54.160 --> 01:12:00.160] he gets appointed to until he runs across the pro se from hell, the one that's prepared [01:12:00.160 --> 01:12:02.120] to kick his behind. [01:12:02.120 --> 01:12:05.880] How old is this lawyer? [01:12:05.880 --> 01:12:10.360] Very young, maybe 29. [01:12:10.360 --> 01:12:17.680] First year in practice, one bar grievance, they'll cancel his malpractice insurance. [01:12:17.680 --> 01:12:23.200] Before you screw him out of business, you might go to him and say, look, I've got about [01:12:23.200 --> 01:12:28.080] five bar grievances that I'm prepared to file against you. [01:12:28.080 --> 01:12:32.240] You can either adequately adjudicate this case. [01:12:32.240 --> 01:12:34.400] I will fire you tomorrow. [01:12:34.400 --> 01:12:43.040] I will bar review one at a time, once a week for the next five weeks and then I'll file [01:12:43.040 --> 01:12:45.600] a malpractice suit against you. [01:12:45.600 --> 01:12:46.600] Your call. [01:12:46.600 --> 01:12:50.600] You want to get in there and do your job and what the lawyer is going to do is going to [01:12:50.600 --> 01:12:54.120] go to the judge, oh judge, oh judge, you got to help me out, this guy's going to put me [01:12:54.120 --> 01:13:03.840] out of business and you use their own good old boy system to your advantage. [01:13:03.840 --> 01:13:09.520] This would still be viable even though the case is done. [01:13:09.520 --> 01:13:16.960] Hold on, you are breaking up, I think we have some internet issues coming into our system [01:13:16.960 --> 01:13:17.960] from outside. [01:13:17.960 --> 01:13:22.360] Okay, say that again Jeff. [01:13:22.360 --> 01:13:28.320] Is that still a valid strategy given that the trial is over and that's it? [01:13:28.320 --> 01:13:29.640] Oh yeah. [01:13:29.640 --> 01:13:37.200] You tell him, you file for a new trial and you get this conviction overturned or I will [01:13:37.200 --> 01:13:41.160] bar groove you out of business. [01:13:41.160 --> 01:13:48.840] He does not have to be your buddy and now what he's going to do is file a motion for [01:13:48.840 --> 01:13:56.920] our new hearing and go to the judge and say, this guy's going to put me out of business, [01:13:56.920 --> 01:14:00.960] you've got to help me out. [01:14:00.960 --> 01:14:03.120] This is your best shot right now. [01:14:03.120 --> 01:14:08.480] It's clear they're not your buddies, they've pretty well done the worst they can do, they've [01:14:08.480 --> 01:14:17.760] done what they can do and now once you do that and you might consider a judicial conduct [01:14:17.760 --> 01:14:27.360] complaint against the judge, just to muddy their waters because they might want to violate [01:14:27.360 --> 01:14:32.960] your probation, try to stick you in jail but if you sting them both, now you've muddied [01:14:32.960 --> 01:14:33.960] their water. [01:14:33.960 --> 01:14:39.560] Now if they try to violate your probation, then you accuse them of retaliation so it [01:14:39.560 --> 01:14:40.560] makes sense. [01:14:40.560 --> 01:14:42.960] You've got a different argument. [01:14:42.960 --> 01:14:48.680] They'll know what you're doing when you do that. [01:14:48.680 --> 01:14:56.520] You have two options, you can either wait until your probation is over and take them [01:14:56.520 --> 01:15:02.200] on or you can try to get your lawyer to get this thing overturned and right now you have [01:15:02.200 --> 01:15:08.320] the best leverage politically with your lawyer. [01:15:08.320 --> 01:15:11.040] First year lawyer, he is ultimately vulnerable. [01:15:11.040 --> 01:15:19.600] I suggest you call him Monday or even tomorrow and say, look, you file a motion for rehearing [01:15:19.600 --> 01:15:23.240] or make a list of bar grievances you can file against him. [01:15:23.240 --> 01:15:30.920] I'll file one of these every week for the next five weeks. [01:15:30.920 --> 01:15:34.720] Good luck with your bar card. [01:15:34.720 --> 01:15:42.080] And now he'd get him to go to the judge and see if he can get the new trial and a different [01:15:42.080 --> 01:15:43.920] adjudication. [01:15:43.920 --> 01:15:50.440] What they can do is grant the new trial, now the conviction is gone and then come to you [01:15:50.440 --> 01:15:58.360] and make a deal and keep this, keep you from having something that would put you in jail. [01:15:58.360 --> 01:16:01.960] Sound reasonable? [01:16:01.960 --> 01:16:03.240] It does sound reasonable. [01:16:03.240 --> 01:16:06.640] Now, are these questions available? [01:16:06.640 --> 01:16:10.040] Where would I find them as a pro se? [01:16:10.040 --> 01:16:13.600] Wait a minute, you are breaking up very bad. [01:16:13.600 --> 01:16:15.640] Say that again. [01:16:15.640 --> 01:16:16.640] Sorry. [01:16:16.640 --> 01:16:19.760] Juris imprudence is down. [01:16:19.760 --> 01:16:22.040] Where do I find the sample motion? [01:16:22.040 --> 01:16:26.800] Oh, I don't have a sample motion for that online. [01:16:26.800 --> 01:16:27.800] Send me an email. [01:16:27.800 --> 01:16:28.800] I will. [01:16:28.800 --> 01:16:39.520] I actually have, I think I have jurisimprudence.websiteup, I'm not sure, I'll have to recheck, but [01:16:39.520 --> 01:16:40.520] send me an email. [01:16:40.520 --> 01:16:43.520] I will get you something to file. [01:16:43.520 --> 01:16:46.040] All right, will do. [01:16:46.040 --> 01:16:47.040] Okay. [01:16:47.040 --> 01:16:48.040] Thank you, Jeff. [01:16:48.040 --> 01:16:49.040] And don't be a stranger. [01:16:49.040 --> 01:16:52.040] Keep us up to date on what happens. [01:16:52.040 --> 01:16:53.040] Okay. [01:16:53.040 --> 01:16:54.040] Okay. [01:16:54.040 --> 01:16:57.040] We're about to go to break. [01:16:57.040 --> 01:17:00.240] We'll be right back. [01:17:00.240 --> 01:17:04.840] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:17:04.840 --> 01:17:09.080] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [01:17:09.080 --> 01:17:13.360] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you [01:17:13.360 --> 01:17:14.360] can win too. [01:17:14.360 --> 01:17:19.160] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal [01:17:19.160 --> 01:17:20.880] civil rights statutes. [01:17:20.880 --> 01:17:24.520] What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons. [01:17:24.520 --> 01:17:26.520] How to answer letters and phone calls. [01:17:26.520 --> 01:17:28.760] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [01:17:28.760 --> 01:17:33.760] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [01:17:33.760 --> 01:17:38.880] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:17:38.880 --> 01:17:41.040] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:17:41.040 --> 01:17:46.640] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, [01:17:46.640 --> 01:17:49.560] or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. [01:17:49.560 --> 01:17:59.040] That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt [01:17:59.040 --> 01:18:00.040] collectors now. [01:18:00.040 --> 01:18:04.840] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination [01:18:04.840 --> 01:18:09.200] by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [01:18:09.200 --> 01:18:13.120] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality [01:18:13.120 --> 01:18:14.680] coins and precious metals. [01:18:14.680 --> 01:18:18.640] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [01:18:18.640 --> 01:18:23.280] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers [01:18:23.280 --> 01:18:24.280] and journalists. [01:18:24.280 --> 01:18:27.280] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [01:18:27.280 --> 01:18:31.520] In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and [01:18:31.520 --> 01:18:32.520] Polynburks. [01:18:32.520 --> 01:18:37.400] We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition [01:18:37.400 --> 01:18:39.560] at 10% above wholesale, and more. [01:18:39.560 --> 01:18:43.200] We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment. [01:18:43.200 --> 01:18:46.520] Call us at 512-646-6440. [01:18:46.520 --> 01:18:51.480] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [01:18:51.480 --> 01:18:54.600] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. [01:18:54.600 --> 01:19:22.600] Visit us at CapitalCoinAndBullying.com or call 512-646-6440. [01:19:25.600 --> 01:19:33.960] Okay, we are back. [01:19:33.960 --> 01:19:35.960] Randy Kelton from the Rule of Law Radio. [01:19:35.960 --> 01:19:38.960] I'm going to go into Rodney in Texas. [01:19:38.960 --> 01:19:45.320] Hello, Rodney. [01:19:45.320 --> 01:19:49.200] Hello Rodney. [01:19:49.200 --> 01:19:52.200] I think Rodney fell asleep. [01:19:52.200 --> 01:19:55.200] I have that effect on people. [01:19:55.200 --> 01:19:56.200] Hello, hello. [01:19:56.200 --> 01:19:57.200] There you go. [01:19:57.200 --> 01:19:58.200] Okay. [01:19:58.200 --> 01:19:59.200] Hello Rodney. [01:19:59.200 --> 01:20:05.280] I was going to take Danny, but that Danny's a chump, so I took Rodney instead. [01:20:05.280 --> 01:20:07.400] I think you mean I am Danny. [01:20:07.400 --> 01:20:10.400] I know, I was just kidding. [01:20:10.400 --> 01:20:11.400] All right. [01:20:11.400 --> 01:20:12.400] Hey, Randy. [01:20:12.400 --> 01:20:18.640] The reason for my call this evening is because my wife is fighting a ticket here in Tarrant [01:20:18.640 --> 01:20:24.640] County in Southlake, and she had a jury trial this past Tuesday. [01:20:24.640 --> 01:20:26.640] Oh, Southlake. [01:20:26.640 --> 01:20:27.640] Interesting. [01:20:27.640 --> 01:20:28.640] Yeah. [01:20:28.640 --> 01:20:29.640] Right. [01:20:29.640 --> 01:20:32.640] I have a real quick story about Southlake. [01:20:32.640 --> 01:20:33.640] Okay. [01:20:33.640 --> 01:20:41.120] A friend of mine knew a guy who went into the court, and he had a turban on. [01:20:41.120 --> 01:20:44.400] And they told him to take it off, and he said he couldn't, it was a religious thing. [01:20:44.400 --> 01:20:46.760] So he threw him out of the courtroom. [01:20:46.760 --> 01:20:54.640] He goes out in the hall, and he told David, he said, this bailiff came up to me and asked [01:20:54.640 --> 01:20:56.640] me if I was Randy Kelton. [01:20:56.640 --> 01:21:00.040] He said, do you know a Randy Kelton? [01:21:00.040 --> 01:21:04.920] David said, oh yeah, I know Randy Kelton. [01:21:04.920 --> 01:21:11.200] So maybe if you mention my name in Southlake, they'll either drop your ticket or throw you [01:21:11.200 --> 01:21:13.200] under the bus. [01:21:13.200 --> 01:21:19.280] Well, maybe we'll use that here, depending on what else you hear here. [01:21:19.280 --> 01:21:22.000] So she had the jury trial on Tuesday. [01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:25.120] We were actually really surprised they went that far. [01:21:25.120 --> 01:21:30.920] But she did receive a complaint in the mail leading up to the case, and the complaint [01:21:30.920 --> 01:21:40.040] had language that was taken directly from the transportation code, sub-chapter H, and [01:21:40.040 --> 01:21:44.480] they took section 545, 351, maximum speed requirement. [01:21:44.480 --> 01:21:51.680] They took the language directly from A. And my wife argued in court for a motion to dismiss [01:21:51.680 --> 01:21:59.200] that they did not include section B that requires her to have been in a collision. [01:21:59.200 --> 01:22:09.160] And the prosecution argued to the judge that that makes no sense, and it would be silly [01:22:09.160 --> 01:22:14.960] to have a requirement that someone be in an accident in order to meet the requirement [01:22:14.960 --> 01:22:18.640] of section 545. [01:22:18.640 --> 01:22:25.600] And so the judge dismissed her motion and sided with the prosecution. [01:22:25.600 --> 01:22:35.360] My wife also brought up section 201 of the speed signs being for commercial use and that [01:22:35.360 --> 01:22:40.960] she wasn't involved in a commercial activity of the time that she was pulled over. [01:22:40.960 --> 01:22:45.960] And the prosecution agreed and said, yeah, she wasn't in a commercial capacity at the [01:22:45.960 --> 01:22:51.080] time, and those signs don't apply to her, but we're not charging her under that code. [01:22:51.080 --> 01:22:54.880] We're charging her under prima facie. [01:22:54.880 --> 01:22:59.920] Well, nothing in the complaint indicates she was charged. [01:22:59.920 --> 01:23:00.920] Wait a minute. [01:23:00.920 --> 01:23:01.920] Hold on. [01:23:01.920 --> 01:23:02.920] Prima facie what? [01:23:02.920 --> 01:23:17.600] Prima facie, section 545, 352, where it says anything over the posted limit is therefore [01:23:17.600 --> 01:23:20.600] unsafe and unreasonable. [01:23:20.600 --> 01:23:26.680] The posted limit only applies to commercial vehicles, so only commercial vehicles are [01:23:26.680 --> 01:23:30.120] unsafe over the posted limit. [01:23:30.120 --> 01:23:31.120] Yes, sir. [01:23:31.120 --> 01:23:39.400] And that's what she tried to argue, and the judge did rule against her at that time too [01:23:39.400 --> 01:23:45.800] and said, the judge even said, and we have some recordings of it too, that the judge [01:23:45.800 --> 01:23:50.160] didn't understand the argument, therefore she would rule against it. [01:23:50.160 --> 01:23:56.800] But I guess my question is, the complaint only took specific language, one piece of [01:23:56.800 --> 01:24:05.880] language from 545, 351, they completely ignored the second required element of a collision. [01:24:05.880 --> 01:24:11.840] And then in the charge of the court, when she instructed the jury, she instructed the [01:24:11.840 --> 01:24:19.320] jury to make sure that the prosecution met all of the elements of the crime, and we have [01:24:19.320 --> 01:24:22.080] the documents here that she gave to the jury. [01:24:22.080 --> 01:24:28.880] It had subsection A of an operator's speed cannot be greater than what's reasonable [01:24:28.880 --> 01:24:29.880] and prudent. [01:24:29.880 --> 01:24:35.520] It talked about prima facie, and it completely ignored the collision part. [01:24:35.520 --> 01:24:42.080] So my question to you is, is this something that an appeals court would see as a voucher? [01:24:42.080 --> 01:24:50.520] This is exactly the kind of thing that an appeals court will address, but your appeal [01:24:50.520 --> 01:25:03.480] from this court will, wait a minute, is Southlake a court of record? [01:25:03.480 --> 01:25:05.720] I don't know the answer to that. [01:25:05.720 --> 01:25:09.400] How would I find that information or what would clue me in? [01:25:09.400 --> 01:25:13.280] It's required to be posted. [01:25:13.280 --> 01:25:18.240] You can go to the court and ask the clerk, you can call the clerk and ask them, but if [01:25:18.240 --> 01:25:25.080] it's a court of record, it is required to be posted as a court of record. [01:25:25.080 --> 01:25:32.000] But neither case, you appeal this to the county court. [01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:42.520] And the county court, if it's a court of record, then that's an interesting question. [01:25:42.520 --> 01:25:47.360] If it's a court of record, I would think you would appeal to the court of appeals and not [01:25:47.360 --> 01:25:54.080] to the county court, because the trial de novo is appealed to the county court, but [01:25:54.080 --> 01:25:59.160] it's as if, it's a do-over, it's as if the original trial didn't happen. [01:25:59.160 --> 01:26:00.160] Okay. [01:26:00.160 --> 01:26:07.480] She did, the judge did give my wife information sheet on appeals, and the first direction [01:26:07.480 --> 01:26:13.720] piece is to file a written motion for a new trial, not later than the 10th day after the [01:26:13.720 --> 01:26:18.200] date on which the judgment is rendered. [01:26:18.200 --> 01:26:19.680] Absolutely do that. [01:26:19.680 --> 01:26:20.680] Okay. [01:26:20.680 --> 01:26:29.160] And bar grieve the prosecutor first and judicial conduct complaint the judge second, and then [01:26:29.160 --> 01:26:33.360] file this, accuse the judge of being incompetent. [01:26:33.360 --> 01:26:34.360] Right. [01:26:34.360 --> 01:26:42.200] Now, when it says 10th day, does that include Saturday and Sunday? [01:26:42.200 --> 01:26:43.200] Yes. [01:26:43.200 --> 01:26:44.200] Okay. [01:26:44.200 --> 01:26:45.200] Okay. [01:26:45.200 --> 01:26:46.200] Okay. [01:26:46.200 --> 01:26:53.960] When you file the thing about deadlines, if you don't have your document completed, [01:26:53.960 --> 01:26:54.960] file it anyway. [01:26:54.960 --> 01:26:55.960] Okay. [01:26:55.960 --> 01:27:04.760] You get it in within the time limit, and then you move the court to allow an appeal. [01:27:04.760 --> 01:27:17.200] You claim that you accidentally filed a draft copy, and that'll always get you in. [01:27:17.200 --> 01:27:23.280] So don't miss the deadline just because you don't have it exactly the way you want it. [01:27:23.280 --> 01:27:24.280] Okay. [01:27:24.280 --> 01:27:28.880] Well, the first step is just to make a written motion for a new trial, so that doesn't sound [01:27:28.880 --> 01:27:29.880] that hard. [01:27:29.880 --> 01:27:38.520] A motion for a new trial should contain findings of fact and conclusions at law. [01:27:38.520 --> 01:27:39.520] Okay. [01:27:39.520 --> 01:27:45.560] But that's me asking them for their findings and conclusions of law, right? [01:27:45.560 --> 01:27:46.560] No, no. [01:27:46.560 --> 01:27:48.400] You make your own findings. [01:27:48.400 --> 01:27:55.720] You say, here are the facts, here's the law as it applies to the facts, therefore this [01:27:55.720 --> 01:28:02.280] is the ruling the court should have came to and failed to, therefore you move the court [01:28:02.280 --> 01:28:03.600] for a new trial. [01:28:03.600 --> 01:28:05.840] You essentially write your appeal. [01:28:05.840 --> 01:28:13.320] Now, it doesn't have to be as complete as an actual appeal, but you have to show where [01:28:13.320 --> 01:28:20.480] the court erred and why the court should grant a new trial so it can correct the error. [01:28:20.480 --> 01:28:21.480] Okay. [01:28:21.480 --> 01:28:26.720] And just to go back, you said, you asked me if it was a court of record. [01:28:26.720 --> 01:28:32.560] If it is a court of record, you told me to do something if it was a court of record. [01:28:32.560 --> 01:28:41.320] But in both cases, just file, for now, just file the motion for a new trial. [01:28:41.320 --> 01:28:42.320] Motion for a new trial. [01:28:42.320 --> 01:28:43.320] Okay. [01:28:43.320 --> 01:28:46.400] In either case, this will work. [01:28:46.400 --> 01:28:50.480] I'm relatively certain it is a court of record. [01:28:50.480 --> 01:28:51.480] Okay. [01:28:51.480 --> 01:28:57.480] And I would assume that it does not take you by surprise that the prosecution and the state [01:28:57.480 --> 01:29:06.000] would take one element of the statute, place it in the complaint, and then prosecute something [01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:07.000] else because... [01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:10.920] You should challenge the sufficiency of the complaint. [01:29:10.920 --> 01:29:15.600] Well, yeah, that's what we did or she did. [01:29:15.600 --> 01:29:22.480] She said, in the motion, she said, well, they're only prosecuting me under element A and they've [01:29:22.480 --> 01:29:27.760] excluded B. And like I said, that's when I have to look at the notes here, but... [01:29:27.760 --> 01:29:28.760] Okay. [01:29:28.760 --> 01:29:35.200] This A and B, are they A and B or A or B? [01:29:35.200 --> 01:29:39.440] A and B. Definitely an and. [01:29:39.440 --> 01:29:42.760] You should bar grieve the lawyer. [01:29:42.760 --> 01:29:43.920] Right. [01:29:43.920 --> 01:29:50.280] Read article 2.01, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:29:50.280 --> 01:29:52.320] Hang on, about to go to break. [01:29:52.320 --> 01:29:53.320] Okay. [01:29:53.320 --> 01:29:57.760] Randy Kelton, Lula La Radio, we'll be right back. [01:29:57.760 --> 01:30:07.840] Bands on smoking in public places have spawned a new way to light up the electronic cigarette. [01:30:07.840 --> 01:30:09.840] Proponents claim they're safe, but are they? [01:30:09.840 --> 01:30:14.040] But Dr. Catherine Albrecht, I'll be back in just a moment with smoking hot information [01:30:14.040 --> 01:30:16.800] on substitute smokes. [01:30:16.800 --> 01:30:18.400] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:18.400 --> 01:30:22.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:26.600] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:30:26.600 --> 01:30:31.960] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:31.960 --> 01:30:34.520] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [01:30:34.520 --> 01:30:38.840] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search [01:30:38.840 --> 01:30:42.360] engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:42.360 --> 01:30:45.840] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:45.840 --> 01:30:50.040] Smokers are lighting up again in public places with battery-powered cigarettes nicknamed [01:30:50.040 --> 01:30:51.040] e-cigarettes. [01:30:51.040 --> 01:30:55.160] They look like traditional cigarettes, and some even have a glowing tip, but they don't [01:30:55.160 --> 01:30:56.160] blow smoke. [01:30:56.160 --> 01:30:57.160] They emit a vapor. [01:30:57.160 --> 01:31:00.400] Some states have banned e-cigarettes, and for good reason. [01:31:00.400 --> 01:31:04.720] While marketers claim the substitutes are harmless to smokers and those around them, the evidence [01:31:04.720 --> 01:31:05.720] suggests otherwise. [01:31:05.720 --> 01:31:11.040] In 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration noted that e-cigarette cartridges usually [01:31:11.040 --> 01:31:13.240] contain nicotine and a variety of chemicals. [01:31:13.240 --> 01:31:17.160] Not only are they addictive, some of those chemicals are toxic. [01:31:17.160 --> 01:31:22.560] One of them is diethylene glycol, an ingredient used in antifreeze, and that's not cool. [01:31:22.560 --> 01:31:24.360] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:31:24.360 --> 01:31:30.500] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:30.500 --> 01:31:35.880] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th. [01:31:35.880 --> 01:31:37.960] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:37.960 --> 01:31:42.920] However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:42.920 --> 01:31:45.680] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:45.680 --> 01:31:48.360] Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying. [01:31:48.360 --> 01:31:49.840] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [01:31:49.840 --> 01:31:50.840] I'm a structural engineer. [01:31:50.840 --> 01:31:52.200] I'm a New York City correction officer. [01:31:52.200 --> 01:31:53.200] I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.200 --> 01:31:54.800] I'm a father who lost his son. [01:31:54.800 --> 01:31:57.480] We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:57.480 --> 01:32:00.680] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:00.680 --> 01:32:02.800] Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements. [01:32:02.800 --> 01:32:06.080] Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms? [01:32:06.080 --> 01:32:09.720] Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting [01:32:09.720 --> 01:32:10.720] them to pay for it. [01:32:10.720 --> 01:32:14.360] Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof. [01:32:14.360 --> 01:32:18.160] That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for [01:32:18.160 --> 01:32:20.920] you with little to no out-of-pocket expense. [01:32:20.920 --> 01:32:21.920] And we accept Bitcoin. [01:32:21.920 --> 01:32:26.520] As a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints, you [01:32:26.520 --> 01:32:30.840] can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the [01:32:30.840 --> 01:32:31.920] first time. [01:32:31.920 --> 01:32:38.240] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:38.240 --> 01:32:42.600] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos [01:32:42.600 --> 01:32:45.200] Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:45.200 --> 01:32:50.360] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:50.360 --> 01:32:56.400] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:56.400 --> 01:32:58.280] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:58.280 --> 01:33:00.560] Me and I actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:00.560 --> 01:33:06.360] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com. [01:33:06.360 --> 01:33:25.160] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Rodney in Texas. [01:33:25.160 --> 01:33:27.360] Rodney, I do need to leave quickly. [01:33:27.360 --> 01:33:32.320] I have Olivier, and he was on last night, and I only gave him 15 minutes, and he's got [01:33:32.320 --> 01:33:33.880] a great story. [01:33:33.880 --> 01:33:40.440] But in your case, I would certainly look at, you get your motion for new trial in, they're [01:33:40.440 --> 01:33:43.400] going to deny it no matter what you put in. [01:33:43.400 --> 01:33:48.440] But bar grieve the lawyer, and judicial conduct complaint the judge. [01:33:48.440 --> 01:33:58.240] Go to bargrievance.website, and on there I have a questionnaire that you can walk through. [01:33:58.240 --> 01:33:59.840] It has two sections. [01:33:59.840 --> 01:34:09.360] It's one for bar association standards, and one for the American Bar Association Standards [01:34:09.360 --> 01:34:13.280] for the Prosecutorial Function. [01:34:13.280 --> 01:34:15.300] You look at that one. [01:34:15.300 --> 01:34:22.000] You got so many things you can sting that lawyer for. [01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:26.580] When we went out, I mentioned 2.01 Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. [01:34:26.580 --> 01:34:33.960] What it says is, very first article under duties of officers, it shall be the primary [01:34:33.960 --> 01:34:42.080] duty of the prosecuting attorney not to secure conviction, but to ensure that justice is [01:34:42.080 --> 01:34:43.440] served. [01:34:43.440 --> 01:34:48.720] This lawyer misrepresented the law to the judge. [01:34:48.720 --> 01:34:49.720] Right. [01:34:49.720 --> 01:34:52.720] They also did to the jury as well. [01:34:52.720 --> 01:34:57.120] They, in their closing statement, I don't know if you would consider it jury tampering, [01:34:57.120 --> 01:35:03.040] but he attacked my wife's argument about a collision and the speed signs and said, we [01:35:03.040 --> 01:35:07.080] all know, let's just use common sense here, that you can get a speeding ticket without [01:35:07.080 --> 01:35:11.320] being in a collision, which that is not what the law says. [01:35:11.320 --> 01:35:14.960] Lawyer to speak with tender to the court. [01:35:14.960 --> 01:35:15.960] Okay. [01:35:15.960 --> 01:35:16.960] Okay. [01:35:16.960 --> 01:35:17.960] Fantastic. [01:35:17.960 --> 01:35:18.960] That'll get... [01:35:18.960 --> 01:35:25.120] If you file bar grievances, you have more than one, file them one at a time, at least a week [01:35:25.120 --> 01:35:26.120] apart. [01:35:26.120 --> 01:35:27.120] Okay. [01:35:27.120 --> 01:35:28.120] Yeah. [01:35:28.120 --> 01:35:29.480] Some of this stuff is probably rather- [01:35:29.480 --> 01:35:30.480] Wait. [01:35:30.480 --> 01:35:31.480] Hold on. [01:35:31.480 --> 01:35:32.480] One other thing. [01:35:32.480 --> 01:35:41.840] The lawyer is required to give notice to the judge if the judge does anything improper. [01:35:41.840 --> 01:35:42.840] Okay. [01:35:42.840 --> 01:35:46.040] It's right there in the standards. [01:35:46.040 --> 01:35:48.840] So that's another one. [01:35:48.840 --> 01:35:52.160] One is failure to speak with a candidate in the court, and the other is failure to give [01:35:52.160 --> 01:35:55.800] the judge notice that he's acting improperly. [01:35:55.800 --> 01:36:00.640] That gives you at least true, and if the judge said he didn't understand the argument, that [01:36:00.640 --> 01:36:02.680] means he's incompetent. [01:36:02.680 --> 01:36:14.680] When you look on the Texas Judicial Conduct site, the primary thing they nail judges with [01:36:14.680 --> 01:36:20.280] are municipal court judges for lack of understanding of the law. [01:36:20.280 --> 01:36:27.340] So this is exactly what they get hammered for, and municipal judges are afraid. [01:36:27.340 --> 01:36:32.360] They believe that the State Commission on Judicial Conduct only punishes municipal [01:36:32.360 --> 01:36:39.440] judges, municipal and JP judges, because they're inferior court judges, and not county and [01:36:39.440 --> 01:36:41.800] district, and for the most part, that is true. [01:36:41.800 --> 01:36:44.720] They use these guys for cannon fodder. [01:36:44.720 --> 01:36:48.120] These guys are terrified of the Commission on Judicial Conduct. [01:36:48.120 --> 01:36:50.880] So file against the judge. [01:36:50.880 --> 01:36:55.800] Do the things you can do as a pro se to make their life self living hell. [01:36:55.800 --> 01:36:56.800] Yes, sir. [01:36:56.800 --> 01:37:04.560] I guess in the body of the appeal is where I would put some language in there where the [01:37:04.560 --> 01:37:10.920] prosecutor kind of said one thing in a complaint, flipped the script, and then said in court, [01:37:10.920 --> 01:37:15.480] I'm prosecuting under prima facie a posted limit, but posted limits don't apply to you [01:37:15.480 --> 01:37:16.480] because they're commercial. [01:37:16.480 --> 01:37:17.480] Yeah. [01:37:17.480 --> 01:37:21.280] And accuse him of failing to speak with candor to the court. [01:37:21.280 --> 01:37:22.280] Yes, sir. [01:37:22.280 --> 01:37:28.320] I was in the audience and I recorded him saying that, so I mean, it's definitely know that [01:37:28.320 --> 01:37:29.320] he said that. [01:37:29.320 --> 01:37:30.320] Okay. [01:37:30.320 --> 01:37:31.320] You have a recording? [01:37:31.320 --> 01:37:32.320] Yes, sir. [01:37:32.320 --> 01:37:33.320] Partially. [01:37:33.320 --> 01:37:34.320] Okay. [01:37:34.320 --> 01:37:38.320] Because I have the opening and the closing because I was also a testifying witness, so [01:37:38.320 --> 01:37:43.200] they invoked the rule and kicked me out for cross-examination, but I have opening and [01:37:43.200 --> 01:37:44.520] closing recording. [01:37:44.520 --> 01:37:45.520] Okay. [01:37:45.520 --> 01:37:49.580] Anything that you have, convert it to a transcript. [01:37:49.580 --> 01:37:54.640] Do not mention the recording unless they question the veracity of the transcript. [01:37:54.640 --> 01:37:55.640] Yes, sir. [01:37:55.640 --> 01:37:56.640] Okay. [01:37:56.640 --> 01:38:00.720] And then I can also order transcripts, correct? [01:38:00.720 --> 01:38:01.720] Yes. [01:38:01.720 --> 01:38:06.640] In a, in these courts, they won't actually have a transcript. [01:38:06.640 --> 01:38:11.280] They'll have the recording, so you can ask for the recording. [01:38:11.280 --> 01:38:13.600] But they gave us, they said we had to pay for something. [01:38:13.600 --> 01:38:16.520] It says here in the directions of the appeal that- [01:38:16.520 --> 01:38:17.520] Okay. [01:38:17.520 --> 01:38:23.440] We have, I have to find where the case law is, but there's case law that says that recording [01:38:23.440 --> 01:38:29.000] that they make is a property of the state and you have a right to it. [01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:30.000] Okay. [01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:31.000] That would make sense. [01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:32.000] Okay. [01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:36.600] Well, maybe I'll try and be in touch with you here in the next week or so because some [01:38:36.600 --> 01:38:39.480] of this stuff is probably pretty complicated, but we'll do our best here. [01:38:39.480 --> 01:38:40.480] I appreciate your time. [01:38:40.480 --> 01:38:41.480] Thank you. [01:38:41.480 --> 01:38:46.000] Just email me, randy at ruleoflawradio.com and I'll respond. [01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:47.000] Will do. [01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:48.000] Thank you. [01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:49.000] Okay. [01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:50.000] Thank you, Rodney. [01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:51.000] Okay. [01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:52.000] Now we're going to go to Mr. Olivier. [01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:53.000] Okay. [01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:54.000] Thank you. [01:38:54.000 --> 01:38:55.000] Hello, Olivier. [01:38:55.000 --> 01:38:57.040] You've been having way too much fun. [01:38:57.040 --> 01:38:58.040] Oh man. [01:38:58.040 --> 01:39:02.440] I don't even know what to tell you because I just got out of jail. [01:39:02.440 --> 01:39:04.280] I just got out of jail about an hour ago. [01:39:04.280 --> 01:39:10.400] I've been waiting on the phone and I ain't got, I ain't got a problem with it, but here's [01:39:10.400 --> 01:39:11.400] the issue with it. [01:39:11.400 --> 01:39:16.800] What I'm dealing with is, you know, they recently knocked my house and took the car, so it's [01:39:16.800 --> 01:39:23.400] the cause of how I was making my money and that's thicker for me, so I'm rendered incomeless. [01:39:23.400 --> 01:39:31.560] Now since then, I've been arrested about four times, you know, standing up for my rights [01:39:31.560 --> 01:39:36.960] and everybody else's rights, but now it's becoming to a point where it's inconvenient. [01:39:36.960 --> 01:39:41.280] I just spent my last bit of money getting out of jail. [01:39:41.280 --> 01:39:43.280] What did they arrest you for this time? [01:39:43.280 --> 01:39:45.280] Oh, suspended license. [01:39:45.280 --> 01:39:50.480] And this is the same cop, this is the same cop he arrested, he false imprisoned me twice [01:39:50.480 --> 01:39:51.480] already. [01:39:51.480 --> 01:39:55.280] He pulled, he was going northbound, I was going southbound. [01:39:55.280 --> 01:39:59.920] He made a U-turn and dead of traffic to get behind me. [01:39:59.920 --> 01:40:07.280] You need to file retaliation charges against him. [01:40:07.280 --> 01:40:14.640] Once you have sued him for this action and him to do the same action again, this need, [01:40:14.640 --> 01:40:16.720] we need to look at the federal courts. [01:40:16.720 --> 01:40:27.200] Wait, now, the suit, I mean, the suit hasn't been finalized, does that matter? [01:40:27.200 --> 01:40:29.280] Has one been filed against him? [01:40:29.280 --> 01:40:30.280] Yeah. [01:40:30.280 --> 01:40:31.280] Okay. [01:40:31.280 --> 01:40:41.200] So it doesn't matter if it's been, if you filed suit, then he knows you filed suit. [01:40:41.200 --> 01:40:47.640] Whether he actually knows or not, he has imputed knowledge and he's doing the same thing that [01:40:47.640 --> 01:40:52.920] you sued him for immediately after, that's retaliation. [01:40:52.920 --> 01:40:53.920] So retaliation. [01:40:53.920 --> 01:40:54.920] Yeah. [01:40:54.920 --> 01:41:01.880] Look that up, generally right next to witness tampering. [01:41:01.880 --> 01:41:04.960] They both go hand in hand. [01:41:04.960 --> 01:41:13.120] You sued him, so he arrested you because in order to prevent you from pursuing your suit [01:41:13.120 --> 01:41:15.120] against him. [01:41:15.120 --> 01:41:16.120] Okay. [01:41:16.120 --> 01:41:24.600] He doesn't know, he doesn't know about the suit. [01:41:24.600 --> 01:41:25.600] I would- [01:41:25.600 --> 01:41:26.600] Yeah, he does. [01:41:26.600 --> 01:41:29.960] I don't, well, here's the thing. [01:41:29.960 --> 01:41:33.520] When you sued him personally, don't they have to get an attorney? [01:41:33.520 --> 01:41:34.520] Yes. [01:41:34.520 --> 01:41:39.800] Well, generally the city will get an attorney for him, but yeah, he has to have an attorney. [01:41:39.800 --> 01:41:42.040] Oh, the city would get an attorney for him? [01:41:42.040 --> 01:41:44.040] So yeah, the city did. [01:41:44.040 --> 01:41:49.280] So I wrote everybody names as defendant. [01:41:49.280 --> 01:41:55.280] Then I got attorneys, I got a letter from the attorney that says, we are the attorneys [01:41:55.280 --> 01:41:57.280] on these two cases. [01:41:57.280 --> 01:41:58.280] Okay. [01:41:58.280 --> 01:41:59.280] Okay. [01:41:59.280 --> 01:42:04.120] This guy absolutely knows whether he actually knows or not, he has imputed knowledge. [01:42:04.120 --> 01:42:13.280] You should go to the district court and petition for a restraining order against this officer, [01:42:13.280 --> 01:42:14.280] a protective order. [01:42:14.280 --> 01:42:15.280] A protective order. [01:42:15.280 --> 01:42:16.280] Yeah, because I saw some of that stuff. [01:42:16.280 --> 01:42:17.280] So probably protective- [01:42:17.280 --> 01:42:18.280] Can you say that again? [01:42:18.280 --> 01:42:19.280] Can I follow a protective order against the cops that we're at the scene to, because they're [01:42:19.280 --> 01:42:20.280] repeating- [01:42:20.280 --> 01:42:21.280] Yeah. [01:42:21.280 --> 01:42:22.280] Yeah. [01:42:22.280 --> 01:42:23.280] Ask for a protective order. [01:42:23.280 --> 01:42:41.560] Ask the judge to order this particular cop not to arrest you and commit the same actions [01:42:41.560 --> 01:42:43.840] against you for which you sued him. [01:42:43.840 --> 01:42:48.160] How about the other cops? [01:42:48.160 --> 01:42:50.000] You can't stop the other cops. [01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:53.800] The judge is going to say, well, if you're violating the law, we can't give you a protective [01:42:53.800 --> 01:42:58.840] order against what they consider violation of the law. [01:42:58.840 --> 01:43:07.520] But you can say, this is a license issue that's in the process of being adjudicated and asked [01:43:07.520 --> 01:43:14.160] for a restraining order to prevent them from arresting you for that particular issue until [01:43:14.160 --> 01:43:17.240] this case is adjudicated. [01:43:17.240 --> 01:43:20.440] I got it, I got it adjudicated against his already. [01:43:20.440 --> 01:43:21.440] Like- [01:43:21.440 --> 01:43:22.440] Is it fin- [01:43:22.440 --> 01:43:23.440] No, no, no. [01:43:23.440 --> 01:43:24.440] Adjudicated means finished. [01:43:24.440 --> 01:43:25.440] Yeah. [01:43:25.440 --> 01:43:29.440] I have four driving on suspended licenses dismissed. [01:43:29.440 --> 01:43:30.440] Done. [01:43:30.440 --> 01:43:31.440] Whoa. [01:43:31.440 --> 01:43:34.440] Then this is definitely, this is retaliation. [01:43:34.440 --> 01:43:36.440] And I got three more. [01:43:36.440 --> 01:43:39.440] I'm in court with three more right now. [01:43:39.440 --> 01:43:40.440] Okay. [01:43:40.440 --> 01:43:41.440] This is, this is, okay. [01:43:41.440 --> 01:43:44.440] You need to file a federal lawsuit. [01:43:44.440 --> 01:43:49.440] I need some, I need some info because my pocket, I don't think I could afford to put it out [01:43:49.440 --> 01:43:51.440] of jail and I'm not giving no ID. [01:43:51.440 --> 01:43:52.440] Okay. [01:43:52.440 --> 01:43:53.440] Hold on. [01:43:53.440 --> 01:43:54.440] About to go to break. [01:43:54.440 --> 01:43:55.440] Randy Kelton, Google our radio. [01:43:55.440 --> 01:43:56.440] We'll be right back. [01:43:56.440 --> 01:43:57.440] Nutritious food is real body armor. [01:43:57.440 --> 01:43:58.440] It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it [01:43:58.440 --> 01:43:59.440] needs. [01:43:59.440 --> 01:44:00.440] Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States [01:44:00.440 --> 01:44:01.440] and classified it as a scheduled food source? [01:44:01.440 --> 01:44:02.440] No. [01:44:02.440 --> 01:44:03.440] It's not. [01:44:03.440 --> 01:44:04.440] It's not. [01:44:04.440 --> 01:44:05.440] It's not. [01:44:05.440 --> 01:44:06.440] It's not. [01:44:06.440 --> 01:44:07.440] It's not. [01:44:07.440 --> 01:44:08.440] It's not. [01:44:08.440 --> 01:44:09.440] It's not. [01:44:09.440 --> 01:44:10.440] It's not. [01:44:10.440 --> 01:44:11.440] It's not. [01:44:11.440 --> 01:44:16.440] It's not. [01:44:16.440 --> 01:44:21.440] It's not. [01:44:21.440 --> 01:44:26.440] It's not. [01:44:26.440 --> 01:44:31.440] It's not. [01:44:31.440 --> 01:44:36.440] It's not. [01:44:36.440 --> 01:44:41.440] It's not. [01:44:41.440 --> 01:44:46.440] It's not. [01:44:46.440 --> 01:44:51.440] It's not. [01:44:51.440 --> 01:44:56.440] It's not. [01:44:56.440 --> 01:45:01.440] It's not. [01:45:01.440 --> 01:45:06.440] It's not. [01:45:06.440 --> 01:45:11.440] It's not. [01:45:11.440 --> 01:45:16.440] It's not. [01:45:16.440 --> 01:45:21.440] It's not. [01:45:21.440 --> 01:45:26.440] It's not. [01:45:26.440 --> 01:45:31.440] It's not. [01:45:31.440 --> 01:45:36.440] It's not. [01:45:36.440 --> 01:45:41.440] It's not. [01:45:41.440 --> 01:45:46.440] It's not. [01:45:46.440 --> 01:45:51.440] It's not. [01:45:51.440 --> 01:45:56.440] It's not. [01:45:56.440 --> 01:46:01.440] It's not. [01:46:01.440 --> 01:46:06.440] It's not. [01:46:06.440 --> 01:46:11.440] It's not. [01:46:11.440 --> 01:46:16.440] It's not. [01:46:16.440 --> 01:46:21.440] It's not. [01:46:21.440 --> 01:46:25.440] It's not. [01:46:25.440 --> 01:46:30.440] It's not. [01:46:26.440 --> 01:46:31.440] It's not. [01:46:30.440 --> 01:46:35.440] It's not. [01:46:35.440 --> 01:46:38.440] It's not. [01:46:38.440 --> 01:46:43.440] It's not. [01:46:43.440 --> 01:46:53.920] Yes, you have, they are, you have had four of these dismissed and they're repeatedly [01:46:53.920 --> 01:46:57.600] arresting you on charges that get dismissed. [01:46:57.600 --> 01:47:00.640] This is grounds for habeas corpus. [01:47:00.640 --> 01:47:06.480] Habeas corpus doesn't cause anything, cost anything to be filed. [01:47:06.480 --> 01:47:08.600] It's the great writ. [01:47:08.600 --> 01:47:14.240] Everything stands down before habeas. [01:47:14.240 --> 01:47:22.120] Send me an email, ask me for my habeas, I'll send you one that I wrote for a kid in Conroe. [01:47:22.120 --> 01:47:28.440] This is under Texas law, but they're all pretty much the same. [01:47:28.440 --> 01:47:34.960] Habeas bring the body and show causes to why you're restricting this person at his liberty. [01:47:34.960 --> 01:47:40.960] So you're going to ask the court to demand that the sheriff or the chief of police show [01:47:40.960 --> 01:47:48.960] causes to why his officers are repeatedly arresting you for issues that repeatedly get [01:47:48.960 --> 01:47:57.000] dismissed and very good chance you'll get an order from the court directing them to [01:47:57.000 --> 01:48:04.400] back off while your suits are being, you know, you claim these, this is retaliation for the [01:48:04.400 --> 01:48:07.400] fact that you filed suit against him. [01:48:07.400 --> 01:48:08.400] Okay. [01:48:08.400 --> 01:48:18.520] This is, this is the right, this is the instrument that's indicated here. [01:48:18.520 --> 01:48:21.400] And I could do this in district court, right? [01:48:21.400 --> 01:48:22.400] Yes. [01:48:22.400 --> 01:48:23.400] District. [01:48:23.400 --> 01:48:24.400] Okay. [01:48:24.400 --> 01:48:28.840] When you take a habeas down, you give it to the clerk and you ask the clerk, which [01:48:28.840 --> 01:48:32.120] judge are you going to take this to? [01:48:32.120 --> 01:48:37.960] And if she gives you any stuff, you see a habeas stands before everything. [01:48:37.960 --> 01:48:46.040] Everything in the courthouse stops the, the habeas I had on the jurisprudence. [01:48:46.040 --> 01:48:53.160] When I filed that, when they stopped the murder trial to hear the habeas, everything stands [01:48:53.160 --> 01:48:55.580] down before the habeas. [01:48:55.580 --> 01:49:00.760] You give it to the clerk and you ask her, which judge are you going to give this to? [01:49:00.760 --> 01:49:06.560] And you know, if she gives you any stuff, you tell her, if I need to, is there a judge [01:49:06.560 --> 01:49:07.560] in the building? [01:49:07.560 --> 01:49:09.720] I'll take it to him myself. [01:49:09.720 --> 01:49:12.640] And then they'll generally assign a judge. [01:49:12.640 --> 01:49:17.320] And then you tell her, ask her, are you going to give him the habeas or do I need to take [01:49:17.320 --> 01:49:19.080] it to him? [01:49:19.080 --> 01:49:26.160] And that's telling her that, you know, the routine that the judge gets it right now. [01:49:26.160 --> 01:49:33.360] And then you go sit in the courtroom of the judge that is receiving the habeas. [01:49:33.360 --> 01:49:39.760] So, you let them know there's no screwing around here and you understand that this has [01:49:39.760 --> 01:49:41.080] to be done first. [01:49:41.080 --> 01:49:42.720] Everything else has to stop. [01:49:42.720 --> 01:49:43.720] Right. [01:49:43.720 --> 01:49:49.120] And in filing habeas, in Texas, it costs nothing and it's probably the same in Tennessee. [01:49:49.120 --> 01:49:50.120] Okay. [01:49:50.120 --> 01:49:53.240] Because there's no restrictions on habeas. [01:49:53.240 --> 01:49:58.800] Now I filed one in Johnson County and the clerk said, that'll be $240. [01:49:58.800 --> 01:50:00.640] I said, don't tell me that. [01:50:00.640 --> 01:50:05.800] Well, I have to tell you that, no, no, no, no, don't you tell me that, go get your boss [01:50:05.800 --> 01:50:06.800] to tell me that. [01:50:06.800 --> 01:50:13.200] So, he went and got Lloyd, the elected district clerk and he came out and said, Mr. Kelton, [01:50:13.200 --> 01:50:15.880] that'll be a $200 filing fee. [01:50:15.880 --> 01:50:20.360] I said, wait right there, Lloyd, don't go anywhere. [01:50:20.360 --> 01:50:26.160] He's going to want to talk to you and I took out my phone, dial 9-1-1 and argue with the [01:50:26.160 --> 01:50:29.600] dispatcher a little bit and they finally dispatched somebody. [01:50:29.600 --> 01:50:37.360] And to Lloyd's credit, he stood behind that counter and did not untrack a foot until the [01:50:37.360 --> 01:50:38.360] police came. [01:50:38.360 --> 01:50:44.280] This big old fat cop comes in the back door, what seems to be the problem here? [01:50:44.280 --> 01:50:47.920] And I said, the problem is you don't have pencil paper. [01:50:47.920 --> 01:50:54.600] Well, why do I need pencil and paper to take my criminal complaint against the district [01:50:54.600 --> 01:50:55.600] clerk here? [01:50:55.600 --> 01:51:01.480] Well, why would I take a criminal complaint against the district clerk? [01:51:01.480 --> 01:51:04.360] Because he's a criminal, that's why. [01:51:04.360 --> 01:51:07.440] It was great. [01:51:07.440 --> 01:51:10.880] And the guy turned out to be smarter than I expected. [01:51:10.880 --> 01:51:16.920] He was smart enough to call his sergeant and we had a big row. [01:51:16.920 --> 01:51:21.200] I come to the courthouse the next day and I see Lloyd in the hall and I say, hey, Lloyd, [01:51:21.200 --> 01:51:22.200] how's it going? [01:51:22.200 --> 01:51:25.960] Oh, it's fine, Mr. Kelton, you're going to try to get me arrested again? [01:51:25.960 --> 01:51:29.520] Oh, that, heck, Lloyd, I'm just joshing. [01:51:29.520 --> 01:51:34.960] I wasn't really going to get you arrested, but I did think it was very funny. [01:51:34.960 --> 01:51:37.840] Oh, that was great fun. [01:51:37.840 --> 01:51:44.720] But the point is, habeas is the great writ, everything stands down before it. [01:51:44.720 --> 01:51:47.960] Do not let them delay. [01:51:47.960 --> 01:51:54.880] So as soon as I file it, so if I file it Monday, I will see the judge Monday and get a verdict [01:51:54.880 --> 01:51:55.880] on it. [01:51:55.880 --> 01:51:56.880] Yeah. [01:51:56.880 --> 01:52:04.960] Get to work researching habeas corpus and that even no matter what they do on the habeas, [01:52:04.960 --> 01:52:10.720] when you bring this before a higher level judge and you force that judge to stop everything [01:52:10.720 --> 01:52:15.800] he's doing and look at your issue, these cops down here on the bottom, they are not going [01:52:15.800 --> 01:52:20.800] to be happy because they're terrified of those judges. [01:52:20.800 --> 01:52:22.960] And I have three lawsuits already. [01:52:22.960 --> 01:52:23.960] Yeah. [01:52:23.960 --> 01:52:31.960] And you put all that down and this is clearly retaliation, Ken's four rules. [01:52:31.960 --> 01:52:37.000] First of his four rules, perception is everything. [01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:42.080] And on the face of it, this appears to be deliberate retaliation. [01:52:42.080 --> 01:52:43.080] Yeah. [01:52:43.080 --> 01:52:47.080] Even my bondsman because he's barred me out and he opened his record, he's like, wait [01:52:47.080 --> 01:52:51.240] a minute, they're rushing seven times on this charge and you beat all of them. [01:52:51.240 --> 01:52:52.240] I'm like, I know. [01:52:52.240 --> 01:52:53.240] He's like, this is harassment. [01:52:53.240 --> 01:52:58.240] I said, I know and you don't even know law. [01:52:58.240 --> 01:53:01.240] Habeas was put a stop to this kind of stuff. [01:53:01.240 --> 01:53:08.040] I'm thinking like, man, you got 152,000 from our car that y'all stole. [01:53:08.040 --> 01:53:11.040] I have five, six lawsuits of false imprisonment. [01:53:11.040 --> 01:53:14.040] I think we've got enough money. [01:53:14.040 --> 01:53:16.080] It's not coming in fast enough. [01:53:16.080 --> 01:53:21.560] I'm collecting all these violations left and right. [01:53:21.560 --> 01:53:26.520] The problem is, is it takes a while to get to the point where you can begin to win these [01:53:26.520 --> 01:53:27.520] things. [01:53:27.520 --> 01:53:34.200] You have to work through the front part and I think a habeas corpus will eliminate a lot [01:53:34.200 --> 01:53:35.200] of your problem. [01:53:35.200 --> 01:53:36.200] Got it. [01:53:36.200 --> 01:53:43.680] And you might consider including some criminal accusations against the police officer with [01:53:43.680 --> 01:53:44.680] the habeas. [01:53:44.680 --> 01:53:52.120] Yeah, because he pulled me over and he's like, if he came up to my window, say my name. [01:53:52.120 --> 01:53:54.120] I'm like, what's the emergency? [01:53:54.120 --> 01:53:56.640] He's like, well, you're driving on a suspended license. [01:53:56.640 --> 01:53:57.640] I said, what? [01:53:57.640 --> 01:53:58.640] I said, am I under arrest? [01:53:58.640 --> 01:53:59.640] He's like, well, I need you to step out the car. [01:53:59.640 --> 01:54:00.640] I said, am I under arrest? [01:54:00.640 --> 01:54:01.640] I'm going to need you to stop doing this to her. [01:54:01.640 --> 01:54:02.640] You're driving on a suspended license. [01:54:02.640 --> 01:54:03.640] I said, am I under arrest? [01:54:03.640 --> 01:54:04.640] I come out the car. [01:54:04.640 --> 01:54:05.640] Well, now you are. [01:54:05.640 --> 01:54:06.640] I said, great. [01:54:06.640 --> 01:54:07.640] I step out the car. [01:54:07.640 --> 01:54:08.640] Okay. [01:54:08.640 --> 01:54:09.640] Go on. [01:54:09.640 --> 01:54:10.640] Yeah. [01:54:10.640 --> 01:54:24.160] This is, it'll be hard for them not to, it'll be hard for them to show that this is anything [01:54:24.160 --> 01:54:27.880] other than retaliation, especially since it's the same officer. [01:54:27.880 --> 01:54:28.880] He did a U-turn. [01:54:28.880 --> 01:54:29.880] He was going north. [01:54:29.880 --> 01:54:30.880] I was going south. [01:54:30.880 --> 01:54:31.880] He did a U-turn in dead traffic. [01:54:31.880 --> 01:54:32.880] He couldn't hit someone. [01:54:32.880 --> 01:54:33.880] He did a U-turn in dead traffic, came and sat behind me, waited until I started moving [01:54:33.880 --> 01:54:34.880] to turn on the light. [01:54:34.880 --> 01:54:35.880] Okay. [01:54:35.880 --> 01:54:36.880] I have someone I want to get, try to get you in touch with. [01:54:36.880 --> 01:54:37.880] He hasn't called in in a while. [01:54:37.880 --> 01:54:38.880] His name's Danny Murphy. [01:54:38.880 --> 01:55:01.840] I first met him in Houston, but he moved to Jackson, Tennessee and he's pretty knowledgeable. [01:55:01.840 --> 01:55:04.040] Well, I don't have a problem beating him in court. [01:55:04.040 --> 01:55:06.040] I'm just telling you that you can't do that. [01:55:06.040 --> 01:55:08.800] You have no, I mean, how do you know that was me? [01:55:08.800 --> 01:55:12.520] That what, what gave you authority to stop me? [01:55:12.520 --> 01:55:15.240] What crime did I commit to make sure to stop me? [01:55:15.240 --> 01:55:20.120] You said on record that I know that you have a suspended license, which is against the [01:55:20.120 --> 01:55:21.120] law. [01:55:21.120 --> 01:55:26.800] You can't know and they just don't go after someone. [01:55:26.800 --> 01:55:30.520] Once you have beat this, how many times? [01:55:30.520 --> 01:55:31.520] Four. [01:55:31.520 --> 01:55:32.520] Four times. [01:55:32.520 --> 01:55:36.640] I have four dismissals on that. [01:55:36.640 --> 01:55:41.040] So that, that makes what they're doing absolutely retaliation. [01:55:41.040 --> 01:55:42.040] Yeah. [01:55:42.040 --> 01:55:43.040] I have seven. [01:55:43.040 --> 01:55:44.840] I have eight of them on the record. [01:55:44.840 --> 01:55:46.800] Four of them have been dismissed already. [01:55:46.800 --> 01:55:52.080] Five of them have, five have been dismissed and three of them I'm in court right now. [01:55:52.080 --> 01:55:55.960] Same process, getting ready to, getting ready to be dismissed. [01:55:55.960 --> 01:56:01.520] And you should, you might consider putting in the habeas these other cases and ask the [01:56:01.520 --> 01:56:05.760] court to quash those complaints. [01:56:05.760 --> 01:56:08.200] Are you serious? [01:56:08.200 --> 01:56:11.480] I could, I could ask them to. [01:56:11.480 --> 01:56:12.480] Sure. [01:56:12.480 --> 01:56:13.480] Why? [01:56:13.480 --> 01:56:15.920] Because it's the same thing. [01:56:15.920 --> 01:56:16.920] Yeah. [01:56:16.920 --> 01:56:23.400] We asked the court to quash them because they're, these are, all of these are acts of retaliation. [01:56:23.400 --> 01:56:30.700] Once you beat them five times, that's an indicate that's just becomes harassment. [01:56:30.700 --> 01:56:33.320] So the prosecution itself is harassment. [01:56:33.320 --> 01:56:36.600] So ask the court to, to- Wow, quash. [01:56:36.600 --> 01:56:41.080] How can you spell quash, how you spell quash? [01:56:41.080 --> 01:56:42.080] Q-U-A-S-H. [01:56:42.080 --> 01:56:43.080] Q-U-A-S-H. [01:56:43.080 --> 01:56:44.080] Thank you. [01:56:44.080 --> 01:56:45.080] Wow. [01:56:45.080 --> 01:56:46.080] That's amazing. [01:56:46.080 --> 01:56:47.080] That's powerful. [01:56:47.080 --> 01:56:54.080] That may, if you get those quashed, they're not going to be happy with you, but you know, [01:56:54.080 --> 01:56:57.160] it gets to a point where they don't want to mess with you. [01:56:57.160 --> 01:57:03.340] Did you hear the guy before you about Southlake? [01:57:03.340 --> 01:57:09.880] I worked over Southlake and it was about 10 years ago. [01:57:09.880 --> 01:57:13.240] They don't want anything to do with me. [01:57:13.240 --> 01:57:14.960] They don't want to see me. [01:57:14.960 --> 01:57:19.320] You know, I had a friend of mine who's on the sheriff's department come to me one day [01:57:19.320 --> 01:57:21.000] and he said, what'd you do the sheriff? [01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:22.760] Well, I hadn't done nothing to him lately. [01:57:22.760 --> 01:57:23.760] Why? [01:57:23.760 --> 01:57:28.040] I had a roll call this morning and he asked who here knew Randy Kelton, about half of [01:57:28.040 --> 01:57:29.040] us raised our hand. [01:57:29.040 --> 01:57:33.760] And the sheriff said, look, you are not to stop him. [01:57:33.760 --> 01:57:42.560] You are not to cite him and whatever you do, don't put that S-O-B in my jail. [01:57:42.560 --> 01:57:47.120] Once you've hammered them good, you'll wind up in that position where they won't want [01:57:47.120 --> 01:57:49.720] to have any more fights with you. [01:57:49.720 --> 01:57:55.080] And this police officer that did this, the same guy that did it last time, he set himself [01:57:55.080 --> 01:57:56.080] up. [01:57:56.080 --> 01:57:57.080] Yeah. [01:57:57.080 --> 01:58:00.080] They're not always the sharpest knives in the drawer. [01:58:00.080 --> 01:58:04.080] And he took my brother to jail for calling 911 because, you know, I get out of the car, [01:58:04.080 --> 01:58:07.080] I'm kind of aggressive and my brother knows me, so he's scared. [01:58:07.080 --> 01:58:08.080] They tell him to get out of the car. [01:58:08.080 --> 01:58:09.080] He's like, no. [01:58:09.080 --> 01:58:10.080] They're trying to force him out of the car. [01:58:10.080 --> 01:58:11.080] So he calls 911. [01:58:11.080 --> 01:58:15.920] They locked him up for calling 911, talking about they locked him up for excessive 911 [01:58:15.920 --> 01:58:16.920] calls. [01:58:16.920 --> 01:58:18.920] He only called once. [01:58:18.920 --> 01:58:21.200] That should, that's even better. [01:58:21.200 --> 01:58:22.200] Include that. [01:58:22.200 --> 01:58:23.200] Oh, include that? [01:58:23.200 --> 01:58:24.200] Yeah. [01:58:24.200 --> 01:58:25.200] Absolutely. [01:58:25.200 --> 01:58:28.200] He was mad because he locked up my brother. [01:58:28.200 --> 01:58:29.200] Oh, perfect. [01:58:29.200 --> 01:58:30.200] This is retaliation. [01:58:30.200 --> 01:58:31.200] This is clearly retaliation. [01:58:31.200 --> 01:58:32.200] Got you. [01:58:32.200 --> 01:58:33.200] Retaliation. [01:58:33.200 --> 01:58:34.200] Thank you. [01:58:34.200 --> 01:58:35.200] Okay. [01:58:35.200 --> 01:58:36.200] We are out of time. [01:58:36.200 --> 01:58:42.240] Randy Kelton, Rudolph Bell Radio, we'll be back Thursday on our two-hour show next Friday. [01:58:42.240 --> 01:58:44.400] Make sure you get Eddie Craig on Monday. [01:58:44.400 --> 01:58:50.600] Thank you all for listening and good night. [01:58:50.600 --> 01:58:56.680] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament [01:58:56.680 --> 01:58:57.880] Recovery Version. [01:58:57.880 --> 01:59:02.860] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible [01:59:02.860 --> 01:59:08.520] says verse by verse, helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.520 --> 01:59:11.800] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.800 --> 01:59:20.800] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.800 --> 01:59:26.320] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus [01:59:26.320 --> 01:59:30.340] charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.340 --> 01:59:32.880] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.880 --> 01:59:41.280] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.280 --> 01:59:51.440] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:51.440 --> 01:59:52.440] Looking for some truth? [01:59:52.440 --> 02:00:12.560] You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.