[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:08.000 --> 00:15.600]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:15.600 --> 00:23.400]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.400 --> 00:29.880]  Markets for the 11th of November 2015 opened up with gold at $1,084.79 an ounce, silver
[00:29.880 --> 00:36.440]  at $14.30 an ounce, Texas crude at $44.21 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting
[00:36.440 --> 00:45.160]  at about $310 U.S. currency.
[00:45.160 --> 00:50.920]  Today in history, Friday November 11th, Memorial Day 1921, President Warren G. Harding officiated
[00:50.920 --> 00:55.560]  at the internment ceremonies at the Memorial Amphitheater at Arlington National Cemetery
[00:55.560 --> 00:59.800]  of one of the four caskets exhumed from American cemeteries in France.
[00:59.800 --> 01:07.600]  This was the commemoration of the unknown soldier of World War I.
[01:07.600 --> 01:13.160]  In recent news, the Chinese e-commerce company Alibaba broke records with $14.3 billion in
[01:13.160 --> 01:16.120]  sales on Singles Day, November 11th.
[01:16.120 --> 01:21.200]  11-11 is Singles Day in China because 11-11 looked like bare branches, a term used for
[01:21.200 --> 01:22.660]  bachelors in Chinese.
[01:22.660 --> 01:27.640]  The Alibaba Group holding limited said mobile sales alone made up about 70% of it, while
[01:27.640 --> 01:31.800]  Alibaba Jack Ma has said that he'd like to export Singles Day to the United States.
[01:31.800 --> 01:36.460]  It's not likely, say experts, since it would turn a solemn day of remembrance into a day
[01:36.460 --> 01:38.160]  of frivolous spending.
[01:38.160 --> 01:42.440]  You know, like Thanksgiving and Christmas, Alibaba was able to make $14.0 billion in
[01:42.440 --> 01:53.480]  sales in a single day in a country that spends a third of what we do on military armament.
[01:53.480 --> 01:58.080]  The world's most popular social media site, Facebook, will now be charged 250,000 euros
[01:58.080 --> 02:02.660]  a day if it doesn't change the way it uses tracking cookies after a lawsuit was raised
[02:02.660 --> 02:05.920]  in one by a Belgian's privacy watchdog group.
[02:05.920 --> 02:09.640]  Frederic de Bouchière, the lawyer behind the case, has stated that he is anticipating
[02:09.640 --> 02:10.980]  other cases to follow.
[02:10.980 --> 02:14.760]  The Belgian privacy watchdog successfully argued that Facebook was infringing on the
[02:14.760 --> 02:18.480]  privacy rights of the country's citizens by tracking them around the internet, even if
[02:18.480 --> 02:20.320]  they hadn't signed up to the site.
[02:20.320 --> 02:24.480]  Apparently, Facebook had been enabling cookies which would load onto a user's browser if
[02:24.480 --> 02:28.360]  they went onto the Facebook page, even if they weren't logged in, and then use them
[02:28.360 --> 02:31.200]  to track them when they came back to the site.
[02:31.200 --> 02:36.160]  Facebook's defense is that it was only collecting computer IP addresses and other unique identifiers
[02:36.160 --> 02:37.160]  via these cookies.
[02:37.160 --> 02:42.360]  However, the court ruled that that information was personal data and should not be tracked.
[02:42.360 --> 02:47.280]  Facebook does plan to appeal the case, stating that only EU courts and not Belgian courts
[02:47.280 --> 02:54.000]  have the authority to make such ruling.
[02:54.000 --> 03:22.560]  This was your Lowdown for November 11, 2013.
[03:25.000 --> 03:26.000]  Yeah!
[03:26.000 --> 03:30.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:30.000 --> 03:32.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:32.000 --> 03:35.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:35.000 --> 03:38.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:38.000 --> 03:43.000]  When you were eight and you had that treat, you'd go to school and learn the golden rules.
[03:43.000 --> 03:46.000]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[03:46.000 --> 03:49.000]  If you get caught then you must get cooed!
[03:49.000 --> 03:52.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:52.000 --> 03:54.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:54.000 --> 04:22.000]  Bad boys, bad boys.
[04:24.000 --> 04:28.000]  I'm gonna start out talking about bankruptcy.
[04:28.000 --> 04:33.000]  I have a friend who's helping someone with a bankruptcy.
[04:33.000 --> 04:36.000]  And the lawyer's really jerking her around.
[04:36.000 --> 04:38.000]  And I know that's new to everybody.
[04:38.000 --> 04:40.000]  You haven't heard anything like that.
[04:40.000 --> 04:43.000]  A lawyer not doing his job right?
[04:43.000 --> 04:56.000]  Well, turns out that bankruptcy may be even worse than family law as far as the corruption involved.
[04:56.000 --> 05:01.000]  We have a lot of people filing bankruptcy to stop foreclosure.
[05:01.000 --> 05:08.000]  The bankruptcy lawyers are charging between $2,500 and $3,000 to do bankruptcies.
[05:08.000 --> 05:15.000]  And one of the lawyers I talked to explained that, I asked him, that seems awfully cheap.
[05:15.000 --> 05:18.000]  And he said, well, it's real competitive.
[05:18.000 --> 05:22.000]  So we can't charge any more than that or we won't get the business.
[05:22.000 --> 05:30.000]  And he went on to explain that sometimes clients have unreasonable expectations.
[05:30.000 --> 05:37.000]  For $2,500 and $3,000 there's only so much we can do.
[05:37.000 --> 05:42.000]  And it turns out it's a lot worse than that.
[05:42.000 --> 05:48.000]  They seem to have a set of things they are prepared to do.
[05:48.000 --> 05:53.000]  And once they've done those things, they will go to the court.
[05:53.000 --> 05:58.000]  They'll ask the client not to show up at court.
[05:58.000 --> 06:08.000]  They'll ask the court to dismiss the case and then they'll tell the client that the trustee dismissed the case.
[06:08.000 --> 06:13.000]  They throw them under the bus because they've done all they wanted to.
[06:13.000 --> 06:23.000]  Well, in this case, she had a friend of mine helping her and he listens to the show a lot.
[06:23.000 --> 06:24.000]  And he called me quite a lot.
[06:24.000 --> 06:31.000]  I worked with him actually and so I helped him with the documentation.
[06:31.000 --> 06:41.000]  We prepared documents initially challenging the standing of the creditor, which is the standard procedure.
[06:41.000 --> 06:49.000]  The only creditor in the bankruptcy was the holder of the mortgage.
[06:49.000 --> 06:59.000]  And they challenged the standing, the agency of the agent to represent the principal
[06:59.000 --> 07:06.000]  and also challenged the standing and legal capacity of the principal to enforce the debt.
[07:06.000 --> 07:14.000]  Well, the lawyer absolutely refused to file the plea.
[07:14.000 --> 07:17.000]  So they filed it themselves.
[07:17.000 --> 07:20.000]  And the lawyer had him a little hissy fit.
[07:20.000 --> 07:27.000]  They had to file three documents on their own because the lawyer refused to do it.
[07:27.000 --> 07:36.000]  And the last time they went to court, the trustee, I'm sorry,
[07:36.000 --> 07:47.000]  the creditor had moved the court to dismiss the bankruptcy and lift the stay
[07:47.000 --> 07:55.000]  because the woman had not filed a payment schedule.
[07:55.000 --> 08:04.000]  And she was saying there's no way to pay because these people have not proved up standing to collect the debt.
[08:04.000 --> 08:12.000]  Well, they dismissed the bankruptcy and lifted the stay.
[08:12.000 --> 08:17.000]  But at the hearing, they called this woman to the stand and asked her,
[08:17.000 --> 08:25.000]  before this, the lawyer filed a motion to withdraw from the case.
[08:25.000 --> 08:30.000]  And the woman talked to us and said, you paid him.
[08:30.000 --> 08:33.000]  He's under contract.
[08:33.000 --> 08:35.000]  Well, he wants to withdraw.
[08:35.000 --> 08:37.000]  Who cares what he wants?
[08:37.000 --> 08:39.000]  He's under contract.
[08:39.000 --> 08:43.000]  So kind of coached her and she went into court.
[08:43.000 --> 08:50.000]  And when she filed the objection to the withdrawal, the clerk,
[08:50.000 --> 08:57.000]  the federal bankruptcy clerk for the Northern District of Texas said,
[08:57.000 --> 09:02.000]  I have never seen an objection to withdraw before.
[09:02.000 --> 09:07.000]  They got on the stand and the judge asked her why she didn't want the lawyer to withdraw.
[09:07.000 --> 09:09.000]  She said, I paid him.
[09:09.000 --> 09:12.000]  I paid him to handle my bankruptcy and he's under contract.
[09:12.000 --> 09:16.000]  I have a contract with him and I expect him to fulfill the contract.
[09:16.000 --> 09:22.000]  She took direction really well because she stayed with the contract issue
[09:22.000 --> 09:26.000]  because that goes to constitution.
[09:26.000 --> 09:32.000]  The government is forbidden to interfere with private contracts.
[09:32.000 --> 09:38.000]  And the judge got that part and refused to allow the lawyer to withdraw.
[09:38.000 --> 09:43.000]  He told her, counselor, you're just going to have to work this out with your client.
[09:43.000 --> 09:46.000]  Well, they'd already bargained him once.
[09:46.000 --> 09:49.000]  And he's still having to represent them.
[09:49.000 --> 09:53.000]  They get to court on the dismissal.
[09:53.000 --> 09:59.000]  He had tried to dismiss it before, but they went to court and stopped him.
[09:59.000 --> 10:02.000]  So the other side filed to dismiss.
[10:02.000 --> 10:08.000]  They went to court, brought the woman on the stand
[10:08.000 --> 10:14.000]  and the judge asked her if anyone was helping her prepare these documents.
[10:14.000 --> 10:16.000]  And she refused to answer.
[10:16.000 --> 10:23.000]  And they asked her specifically if she knew David, the guy I'm working with,
[10:23.000 --> 10:29.000]  and if she knew about RDR Advisors, this company we've set up.
[10:29.000 --> 10:32.000]  So he came back later telling me about that.
[10:32.000 --> 10:39.000]  My question was, how did the judge know anything about you?
[10:39.000 --> 10:44.000]  How did the lawyers on the other side know anything about you?
[10:44.000 --> 10:51.000]  And it dawned on him that this lawyer had to have told them
[10:51.000 --> 10:54.000]  that the reason this woman is giving him such a hard time
[10:54.000 --> 11:00.000]  is she's got somebody else giving her advice.
[11:00.000 --> 11:04.000]  Well, that has nothing to do with the case.
[11:04.000 --> 11:09.000]  And that's privileged information.
[11:09.000 --> 11:12.000]  Client lawyer privilege.
[11:12.000 --> 11:19.000]  The lawyer revealed privileged information to the court,
[11:19.000 --> 11:25.000]  the trustee and opposing counsel for the specific purpose
[11:25.000 --> 11:32.000]  of prejudicing the court against the woman.
[11:32.000 --> 11:39.000]  And in the judge's order, he referenced this third party who was helping her.
[11:39.000 --> 11:45.000]  I read that and I thought, are you guys out of your minds?
[11:45.000 --> 11:52.000]  Do you really think that there is no law, is no oversight of any kind?
[11:52.000 --> 11:59.000]  And I believe they think that because this was absolutely outrageous.
[11:59.000 --> 12:04.000]  And this judge, he's only been on the bench for a month.
[12:04.000 --> 12:09.000]  So first crack out of the hat, he gets a motion to recuse,
[12:09.000 --> 12:14.000]  accusing him of conspiring with the trustee, opposing counsel,
[12:14.000 --> 12:25.000]  and her own lawyer to deny her due process and obstruct justice.
[12:25.000 --> 12:33.000]  So it brought me back to something I had looked at doing a long time ago.
[12:33.000 --> 12:44.000]  I had looked at setting up a company to audit court cases, criminal, civil both.
[12:44.000 --> 12:49.000]  We go through the case, we extract the issues,
[12:49.000 --> 12:55.000]  and this electronic lawyer project on building will extract all the issues.
[12:55.000 --> 13:01.000]  And it will demonstrate all the motions and pleadings that should be filed.
[13:01.000 --> 13:04.000]  And actually write the motions and pleadings.
[13:04.000 --> 13:07.000]  That's the purpose of the software.
[13:07.000 --> 13:17.000]  But we can also take a case that's been adjudicated and run the facts through the system.
[13:17.000 --> 13:25.000]  And it will tell the client all of the things the lawyer should have done and didn't do.
[13:25.000 --> 13:29.000]  And where it amounts to malpractice.
[13:29.000 --> 13:36.000]  And the idea is that it will even write the malpractice suit.
[13:36.000 --> 13:42.000]  Trying to figure out how to get these issues fixed.
[13:42.000 --> 13:48.000]  And one of the big problems is you're on counsel.
[13:48.000 --> 13:56.000]  So we need a company auditing counsel so that once they've screwed the client around,
[13:56.000 --> 14:01.000]  the client has other options.
[14:01.000 --> 14:06.000]  You know, when you go to a lawyer, the lawyer is always looking for deep pockets.
[14:06.000 --> 14:11.000]  Who out there has deep pockets that we can go after and get into their pockets?
[14:11.000 --> 14:18.000]  Well, the lawyer is going to have errors in admissions insurance.
[14:18.000 --> 14:23.000]  That gets in pretty deep pockets.
[14:23.000 --> 14:29.000]  So your lawyer is a source of deep pockets that you can get into
[14:29.000 --> 14:32.000]  when he doesn't do his job the way he's supposed to.
[14:32.000 --> 14:38.000]  I know when we start doing this that these lawyers are going to go bananas
[14:38.000 --> 14:43.000]  because now all of a sudden they've got somebody looking over their shoulder
[14:43.000 --> 14:50.000]  and forcing them to show cause as to why they didn't address issues that were existing in the case.
[14:50.000 --> 14:57.000]  And the one thing lawyers are the most afraid of is missing something.
[14:57.000 --> 15:02.000]  So if anybody has some cases that you might be interested in an audit, let me know.
[15:02.000 --> 15:10.000]  I'd like to explore the possibility of setting up a firm just for this purpose.
[15:10.000 --> 15:16.000]  Okay, we do have a caller. This is Mr. Mike Handel. I was expecting him.
[15:16.000 --> 15:19.000]  And he's going to talk about a hit and run.
[15:19.000 --> 15:22.000]  Hello, Mr. Mike.
[15:22.000 --> 15:31.000]  Hey, Randy. Well, this is the second time I've been hit and run with my court cases.
[15:31.000 --> 15:41.000]  First time was back in, well, technically third time, but just recently in August I was hit and run.
[15:41.000 --> 15:47.000]  I was going about 45 miles an hour. I chased the guy down about a 10 mile chase.
[15:47.000 --> 15:50.000]  He didn't see my car because I was behind him.
[15:50.000 --> 15:54.000]  He tried to do a park and hide and I was right there.
[15:54.000 --> 16:01.000]  And I had a live 911 call and he confessed everything on the 911 recording.
[16:01.000 --> 16:09.000]  The listening police officer or the attending police officer had listened to the 911 recording and heard everything.
[16:09.000 --> 16:14.000]  And so I put open records request in to try to get the audio and video.
[16:14.000 --> 16:20.000]  In the process of all this, the Austin Police Department does not want to prosecute this individual
[16:20.000 --> 16:25.000]  because he's a member of the Coast Guard.
[16:25.000 --> 16:34.000]  And so it took about almost three months to get just a simple request.
[16:34.000 --> 16:38.000]  And it's interesting that they...
[16:38.000 --> 16:40.000]  Okay, hang on. We're about to go to break.
[16:40.000 --> 16:48.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio. Our call in number 512-646-1984.
[16:48.000 --> 17:00.000]  Give us a call. We'll keep the lines open all night. We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:06.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.000 --> 17:11.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[17:22.000 --> 17:25.000]  young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.000 --> 17:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.000 --> 17:36.000]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor,
[17:36.000 --> 17:40.000]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:40.000 --> 17:47.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.000 --> 17:52.000]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:52.000 --> 17:59.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:59.000 --> 18:01.000]  Order now.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:47.000]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000]  Or email MichaelMears at Yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 18:52.000]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[18:52.000 --> 18:57.000]  Or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-F at Yahoo.com.
[18:57.000 --> 19:00.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:00.000 --> 19:05.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:05.000 --> 19:08.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:08.000 --> 19:29.000]  Okay.
[19:29.000 --> 19:30.000]  We are back.
[19:30.000 --> 19:32.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[19:32.000 --> 19:35.000]  We're talking to Mike in Texas.
[19:35.000 --> 19:37.000]  Go ahead, Mike.
[19:37.000 --> 19:38.000]  Okay.
[19:38.000 --> 19:44.000]  Well, I finally was able to get an audio recording.
[19:44.000 --> 19:50.000]  And they compressed 40 minutes of audio to 1K, 1 kilobyte of information.
[19:50.000 --> 19:52.000]  And it's been adapted.
[19:52.000 --> 19:55.000]  There's a number of blank spots.
[19:55.000 --> 19:58.000]  Blank spots have been edited to be shorter.
[19:58.000 --> 20:01.000]  And I believe they've actually altered.
[20:01.000 --> 20:05.000]  I will swear on that, that they've altered the tape.
[20:05.000 --> 20:16.000]  And I have one attorney working the first case that occurred the day after I served the city
[20:16.000 --> 20:19.000]  with their copy of the Supreme Court of the United States.
[20:19.000 --> 20:24.000]  And someone repeatedly hit and ran me and then tried to take off.
[20:24.000 --> 20:30.000]  And he somehow was able to rent a very large budget truck with no driver's license,
[20:30.000 --> 20:35.000]  no insurance, no credit card, no other information.
[20:35.000 --> 20:38.000]  And he was trying to flee on foot.
[20:38.000 --> 20:44.000]  I literally chased him towards the arriving police officer and ordered police officers to hold him
[20:44.000 --> 20:46.000]  and arrest him.
[20:46.000 --> 20:53.000]  And after investigation, the police officer said that I'm going to hold me to make certain that he gets away.
[20:53.000 --> 21:00.000]  So somehow he was able to rent a large budget truck, no information, no insurance,
[21:00.000 --> 21:02.000]  no driver's license, no credit card.
[21:02.000 --> 21:04.000]  And I have pictures.
[21:04.000 --> 21:05.000]  He's just smiling the whole way.
[21:05.000 --> 21:06.000]  He knows he's not.
[21:06.000 --> 21:07.000]  Nothing's going to happen to him.
[21:07.000 --> 21:13.000]  Somehow he has advanced knowledge that hitting and running and leaving the scene
[21:13.000 --> 21:17.000]  and not having any information isn't going to be a detriment to him.
[21:17.000 --> 21:18.000]  Okay, hold on.
[21:18.000 --> 21:20.000]  You're going off on a tangent.
[21:20.000 --> 21:22.000]  Let's come back to this one.
[21:22.000 --> 21:23.000]  Okay.
[21:23.000 --> 21:33.000]  On this one, the Austin Police Department has, you know, they've absolutely said they don't want to prosecute
[21:33.000 --> 21:36.000]  this person because he's a member of the Coast Guard.
[21:36.000 --> 21:39.000]  And that would harm his commission.
[21:39.000 --> 21:44.000]  And so, you know, I've had to go through a number of attorneys.
[21:44.000 --> 21:49.000]  One of them actually dropped out after I signed up with them and working currently as another attorney,
[21:49.000 --> 21:52.000]  another very large law firm.
[21:52.000 --> 22:00.000]  And all of them are telling me they've never experienced the kind of resistance to getting information
[22:00.000 --> 22:04.000]  independently without having any knowledge of each other.
[22:04.000 --> 22:09.000]  I mean, this type of resistance is getting information from APD.
[22:09.000 --> 22:17.000]  But the other recording they provided me is very distressing because it's been redacted for no reason.
[22:17.000 --> 22:20.000]  This is a 911 call.
[22:20.000 --> 22:26.000]  There's a number of blank spots in them, probably, you know, a dozen or more.
[22:26.000 --> 22:32.000]  And even over critical discourse with the other person.
[22:32.000 --> 22:35.000]  The other person tried to do a park and hide.
[22:35.000 --> 22:36.000]  He jumps out.
[22:36.000 --> 22:38.000]  He confesses to the whole thing.
[22:38.000 --> 22:41.000]  And I've got a clean reading and a license plate.
[22:41.000 --> 22:42.000]  And he drove off.
[22:42.000 --> 22:44.000]  I'm advised by 911.
[22:44.000 --> 22:45.000]  Don't chase him.
[22:45.000 --> 22:48.000]  I have a license plate, and so I don't.
[22:48.000 --> 23:01.000]  And so I guess I just wanted to let some of the audience know that in Austin,
[23:01.000 --> 23:05.000]  they have 800 hit runs a month.
[23:05.000 --> 23:08.000]  And that's about 10,000 a year.
[23:08.000 --> 23:13.000]  And they just have three officers working 10,000 cases a year.
[23:13.000 --> 23:15.000]  And so they're obviously overwhelmed.
[23:15.000 --> 23:19.000]  They're not able to do typically what they would do.
[23:19.000 --> 23:27.000]  And I believe it's a subtle way for insurance companies to benefit.
[23:27.000 --> 23:33.000]  Because if you can't, if you're not able to litigate against someone else,
[23:33.000 --> 23:37.000]  well, right away, half of the insurance money is not in question.
[23:37.000 --> 23:41.000]  And then you're left with the people that have comprehensive.
[23:41.000 --> 23:46.000]  So now you're down to a fraction of the people that could
[23:46.000 --> 23:52.000]  and should have a solid legal case just by virtue of not prosecuting
[23:52.000 --> 23:58.000]  or not participating in any significant way, hit and run drivers,
[23:58.000 --> 24:04.000]  that they allow insurance companies to not have to pay out on claims,
[24:04.000 --> 24:08.000]  which I think has been my interpretation.
[24:08.000 --> 24:13.000]  And just recently, the legislature has raised the bar,
[24:13.000 --> 24:18.000]  made it much more difficult for personal injury attorneys to even practice law.
[24:18.000 --> 24:20.000]  A lot of them are leaving the business.
[24:20.000 --> 24:23.000]  So it leaves kind of a Wild West situation.
[24:23.000 --> 24:29.000]  And I would advise all your listeners that the most important thing to have
[24:29.000 --> 24:33.000]  is going to be uninsured motorists if you're in Austin.
[24:33.000 --> 24:37.000]  Because that's about the only ability you're going to have to claim
[24:37.000 --> 24:39.000]  if you are involved in an accident.
[24:39.000 --> 24:45.000]  And it encourages reckless driving too.
[24:45.000 --> 24:55.000]  So you have what appears to be Austin PD protecting this guy.
[24:55.000 --> 25:02.000]  Have you talked to his commander at the Coast Guard?
[25:02.000 --> 25:07.000]  I've tried to, and I'm not allowed to.
[25:07.000 --> 25:10.000]  The Coast Guard, they're fairly compartmentalized.
[25:10.000 --> 25:16.000]  I've been trying to reach out to him, trying to find out if he was even on duty that day.
[25:16.000 --> 25:19.000]  Austin has said that he's in Virginia,
[25:19.000 --> 25:25.000]  but actually I had a private investigator dig in and find out that he's in Texas,
[25:25.000 --> 25:29.000]  which would explain why it's Texas Char, Texas Blades.
[25:29.000 --> 25:34.000]  You know, he's in Texas. He's not in Virginia.
[25:34.000 --> 25:39.000]  Okay. I've never messed with the Coast Guard much.
[25:39.000 --> 25:44.000]  What's the political hierarchy of the Coast Guard?
[25:44.000 --> 25:46.000]  Who's the chief guy?
[25:46.000 --> 25:50.000]  Well, they're under Homeland Security.
[25:50.000 --> 25:55.000]  No, no, no, but they are not Homeland Security.
[25:55.000 --> 26:00.000]  Homeland Security is not the head of the Coast Guard.
[26:00.000 --> 26:04.000]  The Coast Guard has its own hierarchy. Who are they?
[26:04.000 --> 26:08.000]  Who's the head of the Coast Guard?
[26:08.000 --> 26:11.000]  I can dig that up. I haven't researched that.
[26:11.000 --> 26:17.000]  I'm a vet. I was in the military. I can tell you.
[26:17.000 --> 26:22.000]  When you get a hold of this guy and send him a scathing letter,
[26:22.000 --> 26:27.000]  he is not going to be a happy camper.
[26:27.000 --> 26:31.000]  And he's going to go to the guy just below him and crawl down his throat
[26:31.000 --> 26:35.000]  because he's got some citizen sending me this nasty letter
[26:35.000 --> 26:39.000]  making all these accusations about one of your troops.
[26:39.000 --> 26:42.000]  And that's going to work its way down to the bottom.
[26:42.000 --> 26:48.000]  And by the time it gets to the bottom, this guy is going to be in a world of hurt.
[26:48.000 --> 26:52.000]  It makes no difference if he was right, wrong, or what have you.
[26:52.000 --> 26:54.000]  They don't care.
[26:54.000 --> 26:58.000]  When you start that ball rolling down a military organization,
[26:58.000 --> 27:01.000]  it gets real ugly as it moves down.
[27:01.000 --> 27:06.000]  So if you want remedy, that's the place to go.
[27:06.000 --> 27:10.000]  And this is, Coast Guard is like a military organization.
[27:10.000 --> 27:17.000]  When I was in the military, you know, when a general came around to the base,
[27:17.000 --> 27:20.000]  they had to get their fatigues all perfect and all their buttons on
[27:20.000 --> 27:25.000]  and really had to jump through hoops because we were really worried about the general.
[27:25.000 --> 27:30.000]  There's only one person on the base we worried about more than the general.
[27:30.000 --> 27:33.000]  That's a civilian.
[27:33.000 --> 27:39.000]  The civilians were more dangerous to us than anybody else on the base
[27:39.000 --> 27:46.000]  because the civilian could march into the commander's office and crawl down his throat.
[27:46.000 --> 27:51.000]  And all the commander can do is say, yes, sir, yes, ma'am, whatever you say, ma'am.
[27:51.000 --> 27:57.000]  And when they get done with him, he is not going to be a happy camper.
[27:57.000 --> 28:02.000]  And it starts that proverbial ball of you know what rolling downhill.
[28:02.000 --> 28:08.000]  So I would suggest that you take him on through the Coast Guard
[28:08.000 --> 28:14.000]  because the Coast Guard is not going to want bad press.
[28:14.000 --> 28:23.000]  I've got APD on audio recording saying they're not going to prosecute him just because he's Coast Guard.
[28:23.000 --> 28:27.000]  That's great.
[28:27.000 --> 28:37.000]  You accuse the Coast Guard of pressuring the local police not to prosecute members of the Coast Guard.
[28:37.000 --> 28:39.000]  Okay.
[28:39.000 --> 28:44.000]  I understand the Coast Guard is part of the military.
[28:44.000 --> 28:47.000]  That's what I thought too.
[28:47.000 --> 28:51.000]  I haven't looked it up yet, but there's still a military organization there.
[28:51.000 --> 28:56.000]  We have a military structure and I know how military structures work.
[28:56.000 --> 29:03.000]  The guy at the top never wants to hear anything about the guys at the bottom.
[29:03.000 --> 29:06.000]  He's got a lot more important stuff to deal with.
[29:06.000 --> 29:13.000]  And he especially doesn't want a civilian crawling down his throat
[29:13.000 --> 29:20.000]  because the civilian outrinks everybody,
[29:20.000 --> 29:25.000]  can cause more problems in the military than anybody else.
[29:25.000 --> 29:29.000]  So that's where I suggest you go.
[29:29.000 --> 29:32.000]  Okay. That's a really good idea, Randy.
[29:32.000 --> 29:35.000]  You can have just so much fun with that.
[29:35.000 --> 29:43.000]  I just wanted to pass that on about uninsured motorists for citizens in Austin.
[29:43.000 --> 29:44.000]  Okay.
[29:44.000 --> 29:45.000]  Thank you, Mike.
[29:45.000 --> 29:46.000]  We're about to go to break again.
[29:46.000 --> 29:49.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[29:49.000 --> 29:54.000]  Our calling number, 512-646-1984, call boards are open.
[29:54.000 --> 30:05.000]  We'll be right back.
[30:05.000 --> 30:08.000]  When a cat gets stuck in a tree, you get out the ladder.
[30:08.000 --> 30:11.000]  But what do you do if the critter is a drunken moose?
[30:11.000 --> 30:13.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[30:13.000 --> 30:17.000]  Back to tell you how one man handled that bizarre dilemma next.
[30:17.000 --> 30:19.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:19.000 --> 30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:29.000]  So protect your rights.
[30:29.000 --> 30:33.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:33.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:38.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:49.000]  Here's the tale of a Swede, an apple tree, and a moose.
[30:49.000 --> 30:52.000]  It begins with Per Johansson of Saros, Sweden,
[30:52.000 --> 30:55.000]  who heard a roar one night from his neighbor's yard.
[30:55.000 --> 30:58.000]  With his neighbor on vacation, Johansson crept next door,
[30:58.000 --> 31:03.000]  where he spied a full-grown moose dangling from the branches of an apple tree,
[31:03.000 --> 31:06.000]  apparently tipsy on fermented apples.
[31:06.000 --> 31:10.000]  So what do you do when you see Bullwinkle drunk as a skunk in your neighbor's tree?
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  Johansson got a buzzsaw, not to harm the critter,
[31:13.000 --> 31:17.000]  but just to cut enough branches till the moose came crashing down.
[31:17.000 --> 31:19.000]  We still don't know how he got up there.
[31:19.000 --> 31:21.000]  I'll leave that to your imagination.
[31:21.000 --> 31:26.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:31.000 --> 31:36.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:36.000 --> 31:38.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:38.000 --> 31:43.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:43.000 --> 31:47.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:47.000 --> 31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:49.000 --> 31:50.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:50.000 --> 31:51.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:51.000 --> 31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:53.000 --> 31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:54.000 --> 31:55.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:55.000 --> 31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:58.000 --> 32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:01.000 --> 32:05.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[32:05.000 --> 32:06.000]  Boring!
[32:06.000 --> 32:08.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[32:08.000 --> 32:09.000]  What?
[32:09.000 --> 32:14.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[32:14.000 --> 32:17.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[32:17.000 --> 32:20.000]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[32:20.000 --> 32:23.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease
[32:23.000 --> 32:26.000]  is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[32:26.000 --> 32:31.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[32:31.000 --> 32:33.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[32:33.000 --> 32:37.000]  and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[32:37.000 --> 32:40.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[32:40.000 --> 32:44.000]  and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[32:44.000 --> 32:47.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[32:47.000 --> 32:51.000]  then you need to call 512-480-2503
[32:51.000 --> 32:56.000]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[32:56.000 --> 32:58.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include
[32:58.000 --> 33:07.000]  permanent and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[33:29.000 --> 33:31.000]  Okay, we are back.
[33:31.000 --> 33:34.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rue de la Rere radio.
[33:34.000 --> 33:37.000]  And we don't have any callers, so the call boards are open.
[33:37.000 --> 33:45.000]  Give us a call, 912-512-646-1984.
[33:45.000 --> 33:47.000]  We'll be taking your calls all night.
[33:47.000 --> 33:55.000]  And I started out talking about a business that I'm looking at setting up.
[33:55.000 --> 34:03.000]  You know, we've been a long time looking for remedy.
[34:03.000 --> 34:08.000]  And finding remedy has really been a struggle.
[34:08.000 --> 34:13.000]  You know, over the years I've went through just about every
[34:13.000 --> 34:18.000]  patriot mythological procedure that's out there.
[34:18.000 --> 34:25.000]  And I wound up honing in on the statutes in the case law
[34:25.000 --> 34:29.000]  as opposed to all of these other supposed options that are around
[34:29.000 --> 34:32.000]  which seem to achieve remedy.
[34:32.000 --> 34:36.000]  And with the statutes in the case law,
[34:36.000 --> 34:41.000]  we can sometimes achieve remedy but seldom.
[34:41.000 --> 34:51.000]  And that's because the whole system seems to be aligned for those with deep pockets.
[34:51.000 --> 34:53.000]  So it's aligned against us.
[34:53.000 --> 35:03.000]  And our search is to find the remedies that exist inside this system.
[35:03.000 --> 35:09.000]  And for the most part, the remedies we have were put in the system by the bad guys.
[35:09.000 --> 35:13.000]  And not because they were trying to help the good guys.
[35:13.000 --> 35:19.000]  This is a pool of sharks and they tend to eat one another.
[35:19.000 --> 35:25.000]  So the one bad guy knows there's other bad guys out there just like him.
[35:25.000 --> 35:30.000]  And he needs a way to protect himself from the other bad guys.
[35:30.000 --> 35:34.000]  This is where we get the tools to fight them back.
[35:34.000 --> 35:38.000]  We use the tools they put in place to protect themselves against them.
[35:38.000 --> 35:45.000]  And one of those is bar grievances and judicial conduct complaints.
[35:45.000 --> 35:55.000]  And I've been working for a long time trying to establish the grand jury so we can get to those.
[35:55.000 --> 36:01.000]  But there may be another way around this, kind of an end run.
[36:01.000 --> 36:11.000]  Because there are players out there that are not really involved in the system.
[36:11.000 --> 36:13.000]  They're not a part of the system.
[36:13.000 --> 36:18.000]  And for the most part, that player is the insurance carrier.
[36:18.000 --> 36:24.000]  The insurance carrier is a very fertile place to gain remedy.
[36:24.000 --> 36:28.000]  That's why we file bar grievances.
[36:28.000 --> 36:32.000]  Not because we expect the bar to do anything.
[36:32.000 --> 36:38.000]  I just picked up two responses to a bar grievance today and they both said exactly the same thing.
[36:38.000 --> 36:43.000]  We examine it into your accusation, find it does not rise to the level of misconduct.
[36:43.000 --> 36:47.000]  Surprise, surprise. That's what we get with all of them.
[36:47.000 --> 36:51.000]  But we also know it really stings their malpractice insurance.
[36:51.000 --> 36:54.000]  So that's helpful.
[36:54.000 --> 37:09.000]  What I'm looking at is putting together a tool, a method to audit existing or past or adjudicated cases.
[37:09.000 --> 37:17.000]  We get so many people coming to us and saying, you know, my lawyer screwed me here, he screwed me there.
[37:17.000 --> 37:20.000]  Sometimes we find that the lawyer actually didn't screw them.
[37:20.000 --> 37:25.000]  They just didn't understand what was going on, but seldom.
[37:25.000 --> 37:37.000]  For the most part, we find that lawyers have a certain set of things they're willing to do and that is all they're willing to do.
[37:37.000 --> 37:41.000]  Lawyers have weaknesses.
[37:41.000 --> 37:48.000]  Now, you or I, as a pro se, we can go into court and we can screw up.
[37:48.000 --> 37:51.000]  And the court will be unhappy with us.
[37:51.000 --> 37:53.000]  But there's not much they can do about it.
[37:53.000 --> 37:57.000]  I mean, they're going to rule against us anyway.
[37:57.000 --> 38:02.000]  At least you have to assume that the courts are going to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[38:02.000 --> 38:12.000]  And your only purpose in the trial court is to set the facts and put the law before the court.
[38:12.000 --> 38:16.000]  You're merely setting the record for appeal.
[38:16.000 --> 38:20.000]  So you don't really care if it's going to rule against you.
[38:20.000 --> 38:22.000]  The heck with it.
[38:22.000 --> 38:31.000]  So us as pro se, we have powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal attorneys.
[38:31.000 --> 38:43.000]  But most people don't have the time or the background to be able to fight these cases.
[38:43.000 --> 38:46.000]  So they get lawyers.
[38:46.000 --> 38:51.000]  And I absolutely guarantee you when you walk into the courtroom with a lawyer,
[38:51.000 --> 38:58.000]  the most dangerous person to you in that courtroom is your lawyer.
[38:58.000 --> 39:02.000]  He's the one that can screw you when nobody else can.
[39:02.000 --> 39:12.000]  And if you think that your lawyer won't throw you under the bus in a heartbeat, you don't understand how it works.
[39:12.000 --> 39:20.000]  You know, we watch Perry Mason and these other detective programs and lawyer programs,
[39:20.000 --> 39:25.000]  and we see these lawyers go in there and just fight tooth and nail for their clients.
[39:25.000 --> 39:31.000]  That's not how it works in the world you would not live in.
[39:31.000 --> 39:34.000]  Judges and lawyers are busy.
[39:34.000 --> 39:40.000]  The judge has a huge docket that he has to clear.
[39:40.000 --> 39:48.000]  Lawyers, they're generally limited in what they can charge their clients because of competition.
[39:48.000 --> 39:56.000]  So that on the one hand limits them in how much time they can put into a case.
[39:56.000 --> 40:06.000]  Another problem lawyers have is you as a pro se can go in and make a mistake.
[40:06.000 --> 40:11.000]  You can misquote law. You can misargue an issue.
[40:11.000 --> 40:14.000]  You can argue an issue that's already been adjudicated.
[40:14.000 --> 40:18.000]  And the judge is going to strike down your arguments.
[40:18.000 --> 40:25.000]  But a lawyer comes into court, he's learning counsel. He can't do that.
[40:25.000 --> 40:28.000]  He can't misquote law. He can't misargue an issue.
[40:28.000 --> 40:36.000]  He can't argue an issue that's already been adjudicated unless he brings an argument for new law,
[40:36.000 --> 40:44.000]  which very seldom ever will do, unless he comes and says that while this has been ruled against me,
[40:44.000 --> 40:49.000]  in these particular circumstances, this case should be distinguished.
[40:49.000 --> 40:53.000]  That takes a lot of research and they don't do it.
[40:53.000 --> 40:58.000]  The primary thing is a lawyer can't miss anything.
[40:58.000 --> 41:06.000]  He can't misargue an issue and he can't miss anything.
[41:06.000 --> 41:11.000]  I had a guy I was working with and he had a friend who was a foreclosure lawyer.
[41:11.000 --> 41:14.000]  And he talked to him and the guy was real depressed.
[41:14.000 --> 41:19.000]  That he had filed a foreclosure motion, something in a foreclosure issue,
[41:19.000 --> 41:23.000]  and missed something relatively minor.
[41:23.000 --> 41:33.000]  And he didn't know who was going to destroy his career, the judge or his client.
[41:33.000 --> 41:38.000]  The judge was terrified that he was going to lose his career over missing something.
[41:38.000 --> 41:41.000]  That's a really big deal for a lawyer.
[41:41.000 --> 41:47.000]  So when they go into court, they don't like to do different stuff.
[41:47.000 --> 41:53.000]  So if you listen to this program, if you read the codes and find out how it really works,
[41:53.000 --> 41:59.000]  and go in there and ask this lawyer to do the things that he should do based on law,
[41:59.000 --> 42:07.000]  he's not going to want to do them, unless it's something he does every day.
[42:07.000 --> 42:15.000]  And what he does every day is, if it's criminal, gets his client to make a deal.
[42:15.000 --> 42:22.000]  If it's bankruptcy, he's got a set of things he does, and that's it.
[42:22.000 --> 42:25.000]  He's not going to do anything different.
[42:25.000 --> 42:33.000]  If it's family law, both lawyers are going to look at their clients, look at their estate,
[42:33.000 --> 42:38.000]  decide how much they can extract from their estate,
[42:38.000 --> 42:42.000]  and then start filing motions back and forth so they can build their clients
[42:42.000 --> 42:48.000]  to extract as much of their estate as they can, then they're going to throw them under the bus.
[42:48.000 --> 42:55.000]  But always, at the end of the day, your lawyer, you can expect him to throw you under the bus.
[42:55.000 --> 43:00.000]  When you've used up all the money he bills you, or you run out of money,
[43:00.000 --> 43:03.000]  he's going to throw you under the bus.
[43:03.000 --> 43:06.000]  And he's going to do his best to run you out of money.
[43:06.000 --> 43:12.000]  He would rather throw you under the bus than even then win.
[43:12.000 --> 43:18.000]  Because if he wins, and you find out later he missed something
[43:18.000 --> 43:24.000]  that could have given you a better end result, you can sue him for that.
[43:24.000 --> 43:28.000]  Generally, what they say, if you lose the case, they can't sue.
[43:28.000 --> 43:31.000]  Well, yeah, we can.
[43:31.000 --> 43:34.000]  We'll talk about that on the other side.
[43:34.000 --> 43:38.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stephens of U of R radio.
[43:38.000 --> 43:42.000]  Our call-in number, 512-646-1984.
[43:42.000 --> 43:47.000]  When we come back, we're going to talk about how to take it back to the lawyers.
[43:47.000 --> 43:49.000]  We'll be right back.
[43:49.000 --> 44:04.000]  Thank you.
[44:19.000 --> 44:44.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:44.000 --> 45:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:08.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[45:08.000 --> 45:16.000]  an affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:16.000 --> 45:20.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:20.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:35.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:35.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:44.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:44.000 --> 45:50.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:50.000 --> 46:05.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[46:05.000 --> 46:24.000]  Okay.
[46:24.000 --> 46:25.000]  We are back.
[46:25.000 --> 46:28.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Root of Law Radio.
[46:28.000 --> 46:35.000]  And we're talking about how to take the fight back to your own lawyer.
[46:35.000 --> 46:40.000]  When you bring a case to a lawyer, if it's a civil case,
[46:40.000 --> 46:48.000]  the first thing he's going to want to know is who involved in the case has deep pockets.
[46:48.000 --> 46:55.000]  Because he wants to make sure there's deep pockets somewhere so he can get a payday.
[46:55.000 --> 46:59.000]  Unless you've got deep pockets, if you've got deep pockets, you don't care if anybody else does,
[46:59.000 --> 47:04.000]  because he can get his money out of you, and he doesn't care if he wins or not.
[47:04.000 --> 47:11.000]  Generally, it's more dangerous for the lawyer to win than to lose.
[47:11.000 --> 47:17.000]  Because generally, if they lose, it's really hard to sue a lawyer.
[47:17.000 --> 47:22.000]  If they win, and you can show that the lawyer didn't do as good as he could have,
[47:22.000 --> 47:27.000]  then the presumption is that you would have won even more.
[47:27.000 --> 47:33.000]  If you lose in court, the presumption always is that you would have lost anyway.
[47:33.000 --> 47:36.000]  It's kind of a hard hurdle to overcome.
[47:36.000 --> 47:43.000]  But if you win, then that's kind of a done deal.
[47:43.000 --> 47:50.000]  Now what matters is how much you win, and if you don't think you won you enough, you can go back and sue him for that.
[47:50.000 --> 48:00.000]  So what we're going to do is put together a procedure to audit the case.
[48:00.000 --> 48:04.000]  You know, for a long time I've been working on this electronic lawyer,
[48:04.000 --> 48:08.000]  and I know people are probably getting tired of hearing about it,
[48:08.000 --> 48:14.000]  but I'm getting tired of working on it because it's taken me about eight or nine years.
[48:14.000 --> 48:21.000]  But we are in some final stages of preparing a presentation with it now.
[48:21.000 --> 48:26.000]  It became much more complex than I expected.
[48:26.000 --> 48:38.000]  Not that, and it's that difficult, the first part capturing the expertise of a lawyer is a relatively simple matter.
[48:38.000 --> 48:44.000]  But putting all the other pieces together turned out to be pretty complex.
[48:44.000 --> 48:54.000]  And in the process of doing this, once we capture all the expertise of the lawyer,
[48:54.000 --> 49:02.000]  then we have all the legal elements of most any case of every case.
[49:02.000 --> 49:08.000]  We have the lawyer's entire expertise in one tool.
[49:08.000 --> 49:16.000]  And if there's something in there that's been missed, then we have other lawyers who are using it.
[49:16.000 --> 49:22.000]  If they come across an issue they don't find in here, then we have an option for them to add it in.
[49:22.000 --> 49:31.000]  So every element of a case is going to be in there, and most every permutation and possibility is going to be covered.
[49:31.000 --> 49:40.000]  We can say that while cases are infinitely variable, the underlying law is not infinitely variable.
[49:40.000 --> 49:49.000]  So while the facts may be somewhat different, the law that it depends on is fixed.
[49:49.000 --> 49:59.000]  So whatever the facts are, they will point to specific statutes, codes, elements of codes, case law.
[49:59.000 --> 50:06.000]  And our tool is designed to capture all of that in a questionnaire.
[50:06.000 --> 50:12.000]  And then we can deliver it back to a client who doesn't know anything about the subject.
[50:12.000 --> 50:18.000]  And by answering the questions, it will walk them through the plethora of possibilities
[50:18.000 --> 50:25.000]  and sort out those issues that apply to the case.
[50:25.000 --> 50:36.000]  And by sorting out the issues, we have a place to keep all the case law and all the relevant arguments that apply to that issue.
[50:36.000 --> 50:45.000]  So for instance, if you're answering the questionnaire on due process, were you arrested? Yes.
[50:45.000 --> 50:49.000]  And what the system will do is it will create an output report.
[50:49.000 --> 50:56.000]  If you click yes, it will put in the output report or the defendant was arrested.
[50:56.000 --> 51:00.000]  It will say were you arrested on an existing warrant? You say yes.
[51:00.000 --> 51:07.000]  It will change that sentence to say the defendant was arrested on an existing warrant.
[51:07.000 --> 51:13.000]  Do you have reason to believe that the officer testified before the magistrate to secure the warrant misrepresented the truth to the magistrate?
[51:13.000 --> 51:22.000]  If you say yes, then it'll take that you have reason to believe that he misconstrued the truth to secure the warrant and put that in there.
[51:22.000 --> 51:25.000]  This is a statement of facts.
[51:25.000 --> 51:32.000]  And so it will build your output document as you're answering the questions.
[51:32.000 --> 51:40.000]  I know that sounds like I'm going a long way around, but I'm going to replace that leads directly from this.
[51:40.000 --> 51:46.000]  If you say yes, that you think the officer lied, that triggers a franks hearing.
[51:46.000 --> 51:54.000]  And the system will veer off, ask all the questions it needs to develop a franks hearing, come back and keep going.
[51:54.000 --> 51:58.000]  We can do the same thing with a court case.
[51:58.000 --> 52:24.000]  What we do with a questionnaire and on your case and the questionnaire will tell you the motions and pleasings that should be filed based on the elements of the criminal action or the facts and the elements or the facts and elements of causes of action in the civil case or tort.
[52:24.000 --> 52:30.000]  They all have a set of elements that must be met in order for the tort to have validity.
[52:30.000 --> 52:34.000]  And we've got a ball program again.
[52:34.000 --> 52:41.000]  So once it's through, now we have an evaluation of what should have been done in your case.
[52:41.000 --> 52:45.000]  Then we go back and look what the lawyer actually did.
[52:45.000 --> 52:57.000]  And we could show the disparities between what the lawyer did and what the analysis says she should have done.
[52:57.000 --> 53:02.000]  Now you've got questions the lawyer needs to answer.
[53:02.000 --> 53:08.000]  And so you create those questions in the form of a tort letter.
[53:08.000 --> 53:14.000]  The system will spit you out a tort letter showing what should have been done.
[53:14.000 --> 53:16.000]  If it was not done, I was harmed.
[53:16.000 --> 53:22.000]  You'll calculate how much it was harmed based on other similar cases.
[53:22.000 --> 53:28.000]  Calculating the amount that he should render to you to make you whole.
[53:28.000 --> 53:36.000]  And the tort letter says, pay me this much to make me whole or be sued.
[53:36.000 --> 53:44.000]  Then he gets 60 days when he doesn't respond to you the 30, 60 days we're going to give.
[53:44.000 --> 53:48.000]  If you're suing a county or a government agency, you've got to give them a tort.
[53:48.000 --> 53:50.000]  They notice a tort and they got 60 days.
[53:50.000 --> 53:54.000]  Generally, an ordinary person gets 30 days.
[53:54.000 --> 53:58.000]  If they don't respond by making you whole, then you file suit.
[53:58.000 --> 54:02.000]  This thing will spit out the suit.
[54:02.000 --> 54:08.000]  That will be relatively easy to accomplish.
[54:08.000 --> 54:18.000]  One of the things that got me to look at this is I was hired to look into an SEC case
[54:18.000 --> 54:27.000]  by a guy that started an insurance company to buy life insurance policies from people.
[54:27.000 --> 54:31.000]  If you had a $100,000 policy, he'd give you $50,000 for it.
[54:31.000 --> 54:35.000]  And then he would pay the payments on it for as long as you lived.
[54:35.000 --> 54:39.000]  And when you passed away, he would get the $100,000.
[54:39.000 --> 54:47.000]  So you get back the value of at least a portion of the value of your insurance
[54:47.000 --> 54:50.000]  while you're still alive and you can use it.
[54:50.000 --> 54:55.000]  Well, the SEC came after him because the insurance companies were real upset about this
[54:55.000 --> 55:01.000]  because that's the majority of the people who buy long-term life insurance policies.
[55:01.000 --> 55:10.000]  As they get older and they retire, their income drops off, they wind up dropping their insurance policies.
[55:10.000 --> 55:13.000]  So the insurance company gets to collect on it for years and years.
[55:13.000 --> 55:17.000]  And right there at the end, when they're getting close to where they would have to pay the premium,
[55:17.000 --> 55:24.000]  pay the death benefit, the people run out of money and quit paying for it.
[55:24.000 --> 55:27.000]  So it was a win-win for the insurance companies.
[55:27.000 --> 55:29.000]  And they came after him.
[55:29.000 --> 55:34.000]  And I got the case and went through it.
[55:34.000 --> 55:43.000]  And I sat down with the guy and said, right here, right here, right here is where your lawyers screwed you big time.
[55:43.000 --> 55:47.000]  This is what you need to tell your lawyers to do.
[55:47.000 --> 55:53.000]  He went to the lawyers with it and they just jumped up and down and railed in righteous indignation
[55:53.000 --> 55:55.000]  and listened to his lawyers.
[55:55.000 --> 55:59.000]  The last I heard, they bankrupted him.
[55:59.000 --> 56:06.000]  They took his company and he was facing five years in prison for felony charges,
[56:06.000 --> 56:12.000]  but they dropped the felony charges if he would sign the company over to them.
[56:12.000 --> 56:20.000]  And I have no doubt that his lawyers were in bed with the insurance companies
[56:20.000 --> 56:25.000]  because what they did in the case was absolutely outrageous.
[56:25.000 --> 56:33.000]  The attorney general, the securities, there's a Texas Securities Commission.
[56:33.000 --> 56:40.000]  They had absolutely zero subject matter jurisdiction.
[56:40.000 --> 56:43.000]  And his lawyers never argued.
[56:43.000 --> 56:49.000]  There was another person involved and that guy's lawyer did argue it.
[56:49.000 --> 56:52.000]  That guy got out of it.
[56:52.000 --> 56:58.000]  This guy didn't make his lawyers do the right thing and he got screwed in the end.
[56:58.000 --> 57:00.000]  At the end of his life, he lost his business.
[57:00.000 --> 57:06.000]  He lost everything because his lawyers steward him under the bus.
[57:06.000 --> 57:12.000]  So if you're listening and you've been thrown under the bus by your lawyer, give us a call.
[57:12.000 --> 57:13.000]  I'd like to hear it.
[57:13.000 --> 57:20.000]  I'd like to go through some cases from the perspective of let's look at the case
[57:20.000 --> 57:27.000]  and see what should have been done as compared to what was actually done.
[57:27.000 --> 57:37.000]  Almost every case that I look at has absolutely major problems with it,
[57:37.000 --> 57:41.000]  major things that the lawyers have left out.
[57:41.000 --> 57:47.000]  And going after the lawyers, you have a relatively soft target,
[57:47.000 --> 57:51.000]  and that's in the insurance company.
[57:51.000 --> 57:55.000]  The lawyer, he really wants to protect his good name in that,
[57:55.000 --> 57:58.000]  but the insurance company don't care about his good name.
[57:58.000 --> 58:01.000]  We'll talk about the insurance company when we come back on the other side.
[58:01.000 --> 58:04.000]  We're going to the top of the hour break.
[58:04.000 --> 58:08.000]  A call in number is 512-646-1984.
[58:08.000 --> 58:12.000]  Give us a call. We'll be taking your questions and comments all night,
[58:12.000 --> 58:18.000]  and since it's top of the break, it's a good time to go to the Logos Radio Network
[58:18.000 --> 58:20.000]  and have a look at our sponsors.
[58:20.000 --> 58:23.000]  You know they've got some carrot bars on there?
[58:23.000 --> 58:26.000]  You should look at the carrot bars.
[58:26.000 --> 58:30.000]  That was something I had wanted to be able to do several years ago,
[58:30.000 --> 58:38.000]  when they finally got it available, where you can keep all your money in real hard currency,
[58:38.000 --> 58:45.000]  well, hard assets, rather than the green dollars that the IRS gets to tax.
[58:45.000 --> 58:50.000]  I want to look at that. We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[58:54.000 --> 58:58.000]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:58.000 --> 59:02.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:02.000 --> 59:06.000]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.000 --> 59:09.000]  Enter the Recovery Version.
[59:09.000 --> 59:13.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:28.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free Recovery Version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:44.000]  This comprehensive yet compact Study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:53.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:53.000 --> 01:00:03.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:03.000 --> 01:00:07.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lowstar Lowdown,
[01:00:07.000 --> 01:00:10.000]  providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market,
[01:00:10.000 --> 01:00:14.000]  Today in History, news updates,
[01:00:14.000 --> 01:00:23.000]  and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:29.000]  Markets for the 11th of November, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,084.79 an ounce,
[01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:35.000]  silver $14.30 an ounce, Texas crude $44.21 a barrel,
[01:00:35.000 --> 01:00:45.000]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $310 U.S. currency.
[01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Today in History, Friday, November 11, Memorial Day, 1921,
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  President Warren G. Harding officiated at the interment ceremonies
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  at the Memorial Amphitheater at Arlington National Cemetery
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  of one of the four caskets exhumed from American cemeteries in France.
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:07.000]  This was the commemoration of the unknown soldier of World War I.
[01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  In recent use, the Chinese e-commerce company Alibaba broke records
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:16.000]  with $14.3 billion in sales on Singles Day, November 11.
[01:01:16.000 --> 01:01:20.000]  11-11 is Singles Day in China because 11-11 looked like bare branches,
[01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  a term used for bachelors in Chinese.
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  The Alibaba Group holding limited said mobile sales loan made up about 70% of it,
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:32.000]  while Alibaba Jack Ma has said that he'd like to export Singles Day to the United States.
[01:01:32.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  It's not likely, say experts, since it would turn a solemn day of remembrance
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:38.000]  into a day of frivolous spending.
[01:01:38.000 --> 01:01:40.000]  You know, like Thanksgiving and Christmas,
[01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  Alibaba was able to make $14-plus billion in sales in a single day
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:53.000]  in a country that spends a third of what we do on military armament.
[01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:59.000]  The world's most popular social media site, Facebook, will now be charged 250,000 euros a day
[01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  if it doesn't change the way it uses tracking cookies
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  after a lawsuit was raised and won by a Belgian's privacy watchdog group.
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:08.000]  Frederic de Bouchière, the lawyer behind the case,
[01:02:08.000 --> 01:02:11.000]  has stated that he is anticipating other cases to follow.
[01:02:11.000 --> 01:02:14.000]  The Belgian privacy watchdog successfully argued that Facebook was infringing
[01:02:14.000 --> 01:02:18.000]  on the privacy rights of the country's citizens by tracking them around the Internet,
[01:02:18.000 --> 01:02:20.000]  even if they hadn't signed up to the site.
[01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  Apparently, Facebook had been enabling cookies which would load onto a user's browser
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  if they went onto a Facebook page, even if they weren't logged in,
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  and then used them to track them when they came back to the site.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:34.000]  Facebook's defense is that it was only collecting computers' IP addresses
[01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  and other unique identifiers via these cookies.
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  However, the court ruled that that information was personal data and should not be tracked.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  Facebook does plan to appeal the case, stating that only EU courts and not Belgian courts
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:50.000]  have the authority to make such rulings.
[01:02:50.000 --> 01:03:13.000]  This was your Lowdown for November 11, 2013.
[01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:58.000]  Randy Kelton, Rue of La Radio.
[01:03:58.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  And we were talking about, I was talking to Debra on the break about this,
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:06.000]  the guy in Waco and what they did to him.
[01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:15.000]  They tried to, the insurance companies tried to shut his business down by naked short selling.
[01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:21.000]  Now, for people out there that don't know what naked short selling is,
[01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:28.000]  I'm surprised that everybody doesn't know what it is because it is so horrendous.
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  The 1929 stock market crash was engineered, and it was engineered through naked short selling.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:46.000]  And after the stock market crash, there were laws put in place to prevent naked short selling.
[01:04:46.000 --> 01:05:09.000]  And in the crash in 85, no it wasn't 85, it was recently, the one in 07, the crash that occurred didn't occur because of the real estate bubble bursting.
[01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:21.000]  They haven't researched it in a while, but the statute that the SEC put in place that made it a felony to naked short sale,
[01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  they removed that statute in July, right at the end of July, and three days later, they pulled off a naked short sale on Lehman Brothers and put Lehman Brothers out of business.
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:56.000]  And what naked short selling is, is a, one of these sellers will offer up, say, 100,000 shares of a particular stock.
[01:05:56.000 --> 01:06:09.000]  He's got options to buy 100,000 shares. So he'll take that sale and give people a really good deal on this stock that's doing very well.
[01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:20.000]  And he'll give them an absolute incredible cut rate deal. What he doesn't tell them is he's offering these same stocks to 10 or 20 other people.
[01:06:20.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  And when he gets enough sales, then he will take all the sales at once.
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:40.000]  Now he has three days in which time to produce the stocks. He can literally sell stocks that he doesn't have.
[01:06:40.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  And in these naked short sell, they're selling stocks that don't exist. So when it hits the boards that a million shares of this company have just sold,
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  everybody who's holding shares will run to get out of the company. And what the broker does is he goes and buys, he does the short sale, posts all the sales, causes the stock to crash,
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  and then goes and buys up these stocks of all these people who are trying to get out quickly.
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:31.000]  And now he's got the shares to give to the people who bought. He sells them high, he buys them, he sells them high and then crashes the price.
[01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  So then he buys them low and he makes a fortune. But in the meantime, the company's stocks have crashed and bottomed out.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  And now they have to come up with collateral for all of their loans that are out. And the idea is to bankrupt the company. That's exactly what they did to Lehman Brothers.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  They tried to do that to this guy, but he owned 50% of the stock and they weren't able to crash his stock far enough to cause him to have to, he was able to f*** on his way out of it.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  Well, they couldn't get him that way. So they bought the legislature, they bought the Texas, they bought the people running the Texas Securities Commission.
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:33.000]  The Texas Securities Commission came after him when there was already a court case in place in Texas over his business model that said it did not amount to selling securities.
[01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:41.000]  They went after him for illegally selling securities anyway.
[01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  I looked at the case and it was clear that the Texas Securities Commission had absolutely zero subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:09:10.000]  Right here on this day, your lawyer should have challenged subject matter jurisdiction. The guy had a partner, a minor partner, and his lawyer challenged subject matter jurisdiction.
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  This guy's lawyers didn't, and he had one of the largest law firms in the country.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  This guy, the guy that challenged subject matter jurisdiction, they backed off from him. The one who didn't, they put him out of business. Last I heard from him, they bankrupted him.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:40.000]  They were trying to put him in prison for, I think, two five-year felony counts, and they dropped those if he signs up with the business to them.
[01:09:40.000 --> 01:10:03.000]  This was just absolutely the worst of capitalism. Had he had his lawyers applied the law as it stood, and this was so blatantly obvious that they didn't have subject matter jurisdiction to come after him.
[01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  There's no way that your lawyers could miss it. Their lawyers got from him several million dollars. He did three or four million dollars. He paid them to screw him.
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  I think this law firm was bought out by the other side to start with, so they milked the client for all they could get out of him, and then they threw him under the bus.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:43.000]  Yeah, Randy, can I make a comment here on this situation? Yeah, I think that this was actually a sponsor of ours many, many years ago, and I looked at the case law and everything at the time because I wanted to make sure it was legit, and it was totally legit.
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  It was not selling securities. It's actually providing a service for elderly people who have paid into these insurance policies their whole lives, and then at the end of their lives, they either can't afford to pay into it anymore, or they don't have the heirs anymore if they're on the outs with their kids or whatever.
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:24.000]  The bottom line is all this life insurance stuff is a scam anyway. I'm going to go on a tangent here for just one second. All this life insurance stuff is a scam anyway because if you look at what you pay into it over the long run, it doesn't matter where you start, whether you're young or whether you're old.
[01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:39.000]  Of course, the rates increase when you get older. It doesn't matter when you start. If you look at how long you pay into it, how much you pay into it, the amount of money that would be in the plan at the end, it's not worth it.
[01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:56.000]  You'd do much, much better to just save whatever you would pay in an insurance premium. Just take that amount of money and just put it away. You'd be better to stuff it under a mattress, I'm serious, than to put it into life insurance policy because you're never going to get as much as you put into it.
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:12:05.000]  It's a complete and total scam. That's a little side note. Just invest it in something else, believe me. Just put aside whatever you would pay into it.
[01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:17.000]  Of course, the risk is, well, what if you don't live long enough, blah, blah, blah. That's another aspect of it. Back to the story about what happened with this gentleman, it was totally legit.
[01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  I felt he was providing a valuable service for elderly people to help them get back what they paid into it and not be totally ripped off, which in a sense, they were ripped off anyway because they could have been earning interest on that money all along themselves instead of the insurance companies.
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:49.000]  But anyways, the point being, when he realized he was starting to get in trouble with these lawyers and then Randy showed him exactly what his lawyers were doing wrong and then he goes back to the lawyers and then the lawyers pull a snow job on him.
[01:12:49.000 --> 01:13:03.000]  And so Randy makes a comment, you made a comment a little while ago, this capitalism is worse. I tend to disagree a bit. I think this is called lack of discernment at its worst.
[01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:12.000]  Ultimately, what happened to this gentleman, ultimately, and y'all are not going to want to hear this, people aren't going to like to hear this, ultimately it's his fault.
[01:13:12.000 --> 01:13:34.000]  And you know why I say that? Because if you're going to embark on an endeavor like this, any kind of major financial endeavor or legal endeavor or if the government's coming after you unexpectedly or if you get in a lawsuit with somebody, whether you're a defendant or the plaintiff or whatever, I'm telling you, you better learn how to exercise some discernment.
[01:13:34.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  You better learn how to do a little bit of case law research on your own and you don't have to spend thousands of dollars a month on a subscription to Westlaw or Lexis.
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:51.000]  You can go to the law library, heck, you can do just about almost all the legal research you need to do just for the search engine.
[01:13:51.000 --> 01:14:04.000]  It's quick or start page. You've got to learn how to think for yourselves, people. You've got to start learning how to exercise some discernment, okay? And that is where this gentleman failed.
[01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:13.000]  He may have been a good businessman in some aspects, but he did not know how to exercise discernment when it really, really mattered.
[01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  He should have looked at what Randy told him and looked it over himself very carefully, very thoroughly and used logic and reason to determine for himself if what Randy was saying was correct,
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  done in some of his own research to look it up and double check what Randy says, and he should have done the same thing for what his lawyers told him, you know, took it home, look at it, think about it, record the meeting with the lawyers,
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:50.000]  record the meeting with Randy, go back, play them both, listen to them, okay? Listen to the meetings, do your own research, sleep on it, okay?
[01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:58.000]  And learn how to use some logic and figure out what's really going on here, but he didn't do that, okay?
[01:14:58.000 --> 01:15:07.000]  And I think part of the reason that he didn't do that and part of the reason a lot of people don't do that is because they can't stand to admit when they've been had, okay?
[01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  This guy had already given these lawyers who knows how much money, hundreds of thousands, millions of dollars, whatever, and so he just could not admit that he had already been had, okay?
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:20.000]  And so it was a psychological block in him.
[01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:24.000]  This is what I'm speculating, okay, seeing the story from the outside.
[01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:37.000]  And listen, people, you've got to learn to, you know, if you've been had, if it looks like you're being had, don't let your pride get in the way because it's going to end up hurting you a lot more in the long run.
[01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  And that's what happened to this guy.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:40.000]  This is ultimately what I feel happened to him.
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:47.000]  He let his pride get in the way, and so he didn't want to exercise his discernment, and he may have had, he may have been smart enough to exercise discernment,
[01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  but there was some psychological blockage in him, and I think it was pride, you know, that he just couldn't stand to think that his lawyers were screwing him over like that.
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  Because then you have to admit, why didn't I see it coming a long time ago?
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  Hey, listen, folks, it happens to everybody.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  It can happen to anybody.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:07.000]  These lawyers are shysters, okay?
[01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  They're complete and total snakes in the grass.
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  Don't feel bad if a lawyer is screwing you over or has screwed you over like this because it can happen to the best of us,
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:22.000]  but I think this should be a lesson to all of us that we need to learn how to put our pride aside,
[01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:27.000]  and if it looks like we've been had, we've got to accept it and move on and figure out how to remedy it,
[01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  and we've got to learn how to think for ourselves and exercise discernment so that this doesn't happen to us, okay?
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  So anyway, that's my little analysis and rant here at Randy.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  And I have discerned that we are approaching the break.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  And hopefully we won't fall off the cliff.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:48.000]  I won't fall off the cliff.
[01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:51.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Wheel of Law Radio.
[01:16:51.000 --> 01:16:54.000]  I call in number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:54.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:02.000]  My name is Jessica Arman.
[01:17:02.000 --> 01:17:05.000]  I'm an activist, a GCN listener, and mother of three.
[01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  Our drinking water and food are filled with fluoride and other contaminants that harm our teeth and gums.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:15.000]  To protect my family, I created My Magic Mud, an all-natural teeth whitening and strengthening remedy.
[01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:19.000]  My Magic Mud is a soft powder that polishes your teeth, reduces sensitivity,
[01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:22.000]  and removes harmful toxins from deep inside your mouth.
[01:17:22.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  You deserve a bright, healthy smile.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:26.000]  Visit MyMagicMud.com and get yours today.
[01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:29.000]  That's MyMagicMud.com.
[01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:30.000]  Hi, this is Kurt Hildebrand.
[01:17:30.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  I've been using Magic Mud for a while now,
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  and I just can't believe how much healthier my teeth and gums feel.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:36.000]  I love the product.
[01:17:36.000 --> 01:17:38.000]  This is Anna Martin, the libertarian homeschooler.
[01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:40.000]  I homeschool, so I drink coffee.
[01:17:40.000 --> 01:17:42.000]  And I drink coffee, so I use Magic Mud.
[01:17:42.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  It gets my teeth really clean.
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  Give it a try.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  This is John Bush of the Liberty Bee.
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:50.000]  My wife and I use My Magic Mud because it brightens our smile,
[01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:52.000]  and our daughter uses it because it makes brushing fun.
[01:17:52.000 --> 01:18:01.000]  To get your can of My Magic Mud, go to Brave New Books or order it online at MyMagicMud.com.
[01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:19.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollenbursts.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:55.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:01.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:31.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:35.000]  Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Root of Our Radio.
[01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:49.000]  And we went out talking about discernment, and I was talking about putting together a company to audit court cases.
[01:19:49.000 --> 01:20:04.000]  If we're going to get control of our system back, the biggest problem with getting control of the system is the lawyers.
[01:20:04.000 --> 01:20:20.000]  You know, like this guy in Waco, he trusted his lawyers and were pretty well patterned to trust lawyers.
[01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  It's our nature.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:33.000]  If somebody stands and looks a square in the eye and tells us something, we tend to want to believe what they're telling us.
[01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  Randy, let me jump in here for just one second.
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  I want to talk about this issue of trusting lawyers and trusting professionals in general,
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:51.000]  or trusting anyone whom you perceive to be as an authoritative figure, an expert, so to speak, in any particular area.
[01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  It doesn't matter what it is.
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  When I was working on one of these documentary films that I've helped produce, the State of Mind movie, this one, they interviewed a psychologist.
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:10.000]  He was into psychology, and he also worked with psychiatrists, and they conducted research studies.
[01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  They used very sophisticated, advanced MRIs, and they ran these studies on these people, and they determined you can actually see it.
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:27.000]  They recorded it, real-time live video of MRIs of these people's brains.
[01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:38.000]  What would happen is whenever they were in the presence of someone that they considered as an expert in any certain field,
[01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:50.000]  like having a discussion with someone that they considered an expert, the logical reasoning discernment area of their brain almost completely shut down.
[01:21:50.000 --> 01:21:55.000]  This is a physical, physiological phenomenon.
[01:21:55.000 --> 01:22:06.000]  Going back to this discernment issue, I think one of the first steps and one of the biggest steps to take in learning how to exercise real discernment is,
[01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:09.000]  you've got to stop putting these people on a pedestal.
[01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:14.000]  That goes across the board, doctors, lawyers, anybody.
[01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:22.000]  You've got to stop putting people on a pedestal just because they have letters after their name or they have so many years of experience.
[01:22:22.000 --> 01:22:29.000]  I'm not saying that you should not respect them or respect that they put a number of years into their field,
[01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:33.000]  and they may know something more about it than what you do, but that doesn't mean they're perfect.
[01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:40.000]  It also doesn't mean that you don't necessarily see something that they cannot see.
[01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:42.000]  You may be able to see something that they can't see.
[01:22:42.000 --> 01:22:49.000]  It also doesn't mean that they may have nefarious motives, so you've got to remove that veil.
[01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:57.000]  You've got to knock that pedestal down because it is an actual physical, physiological phenomenon in the brain
[01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:02.000]  that that area of logical reasoning and discernment, you can see it on the MRIs.
[01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:08.000]  It almost completely shuts down because you just shut off.
[01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:11.000]  Oh, well, they're the expert. They must know.
[01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  You've got to resist that urge, and the only way to do it is to just stop putting these people on a pedestal.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:23.000]  Like I said, you don't need to not respect them.
[01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:27.000]  You can respect them, but take everything they say with a grain of salt and go check it out for yourself.
[01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:34.000]  That's the whole point because in the end, you may be right and they may be wrong, i.e. vaccines.
[01:23:34.000 --> 01:23:38.000]  All these MDs will push vaccines, and it turns out it's the most dangerous thing you can do.
[01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:42.000]  You can go listen to Sean Siegel's show to find out more about that vaccine myth.
[01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:50.000]  Anyways, I just want to interject that, Randy, about that phenomenon that was recorded on MRI.
[01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:56.000]  It's difficult living in such a complex world.
[01:23:56.000 --> 01:24:05.000]  I suppose a couple hundred years ago, there were simpler times, but it is what it is.
[01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:12.000]  We want to be able to trust professionals because we just can't know everything.
[01:24:12.000 --> 01:24:16.000]  So how to know who you can trust and who you can't?
[01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  You know, the guy in Waco, I can't be too critical of him.
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:24.000]  He had his knowledge base.
[01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  He had this place where he was good at what he did, but you can't be good at everything.
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:39.000]  So at some point, you have to find someone who's good at what you're not.
[01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  So then how to tell when they know what they're talking about and when they don't?
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:48.000]  Yeah, and I would say use your instinct.
[01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:52.000]  You know, God gave us intuition and instinct for a reason,
[01:24:52.000 --> 01:24:58.000]  and if something doesn't seem to be quite right, it's probably not.
[01:24:58.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  And don't just blow off that feeling.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:04.000]  If things aren't going the way you think they should
[01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  or if things aren't going the way you want them to with your lawyer,
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  and he's like, oh, no, everything's fine, everything's fine, go do some research yourself.
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:16.000]  I mean, like Randy says, at some point, you have to work with these professionals
[01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:21.000]  because we can't learn everything about everything all by ourselves.
[01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  I mean, we just can't do that.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:26.000]  But how to know?
[01:25:26.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  I would say one of the biggest ways to know when something may be right
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  is that you've just got to trust your gut.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:35.000]  You have to go by that.
[01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:38.000]  And if it seems like something just ain't quite right
[01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:40.000]  or I'm spending a little bit too much money here,
[01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:43.000]  I'm not really getting the results that I expected or that I wanted,
[01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:47.000]  then take a step back and knock down the pedestal
[01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:51.000]  and get on the x-quick or the start page of the law library
[01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  and start doing some research on your own and try to use some discernment.
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:25:58.000]  I mean, you can't do that for every little teeny tiny thing,
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  but try to hone that feeling, that instinct, that intuition.
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:06.000]  And if the little red flags start going off,
[01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  then that's your cue to start looking things up on your own.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:14.000]  And when I started this particular case,
[01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:19.000]  I knew nothing about the Securities Exchange Commission.
[01:26:19.000 --> 01:26:28.000]  It took about two weeks during my spare time when I had time to get to it
[01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:30.000]  to get this sorted out. It wasn't that difficult.
[01:26:30.000 --> 01:26:32.000]  Yeah, that's not that long.
[01:26:32.000 --> 01:26:37.000]  It's not like you had to study SEC securities law for two years.
[01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  It really wasn't that difficult.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  And I guess the point of that is if you have a professional
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  and he gives you an explanation of what occurred,
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  you should be able to fully understand what he's talking about.
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:00.000]  If he really is a professional,
[01:27:00.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  he'll be able to bring you the information in a way that you can understand.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  Yeah, and if he acts all defensive, like,
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  why are you asking me, why are you questioning me,
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:13.000]  and doesn't want to give answers or acts like,
[01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  I mean, I've heard of situations where the lawyers act like,
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  oh, well, you just wouldn't understand because you're a lay person,
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  and acts like all elitist and stuff.
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:25.000]  That is a big red flag that you need to either dump this guy
[01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:29.000]  or you need to hold his feet to the fire doing your own research or something.
[01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  I mean, just do not put up with that crap.
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  You hire them. You're paying for this.
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:39.000]  You used exactly the right term, red flag.
[01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:40.000]  Yep.
[01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:45.000]  We were talking to someone recently about helping them stop their foreclosure.
[01:27:45.000 --> 01:27:49.000]  She was terrified that she was going to be thrown out next week,
[01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:52.000]  and we assured her we could put off the foreclosure,
[01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  and what she wanted to do was get rid of the property
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  because she couldn't afford it and find another place.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  Well, we told her what all we could do, and she kind of calmed her down,
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  and the last thing she said to us, well, how much am I going to get?
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:13.000]  And I didn't have a problem with that because we intended to pay her a portion
[01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  of what we, if we were able to decrease the principal by pressuring the bank
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:24.000]  and get a lower payoff, we split what we got.
[01:28:24.000 --> 01:28:29.000]  But she asked that question right after she was afraid
[01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  she was going to be thrown out on the street bar,
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:37.000]  and when we left, I told David that was a big time red flag.
[01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  It's not that I had a problem with it.
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  I have these red flags, and we should all learn to develop a set of red flags.
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  The red flag is not necessarily a disqualifier,
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:28:57.000]  but notice when a red flag comes along when, you know,
[01:28:57.000 --> 01:29:03.000]  I had my own business, an industrial cleaning business for 30-something years,
[01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:08.000]  and if a client questioned me about quality, I was very good at my business,
[01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  so I did good work.
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:16.000]  If he questioned me about price or if he questioned me about how regular to do the job,
[01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  those three were red flags.
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  If I got two, any two of those three, in my 30 years' experience,
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  I would never, ever be able to satisfy the client.
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:35.000]  When I got the second red flag, I am out of here.
[01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  I was at Budweiser, a $2.6 million job.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:44.000]  I got the second red flag, and I walked out the door.
[01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  Hang on, Lady Kelton, you've already, you know,
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  Debbie Stevens, don't let me fall off the cliff.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  All right, we'll be right back.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  YouTube is making users post their actual names,
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:10.000]  claiming the transparency leads to better online behavior, but does it?
[01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht,
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  and I'll tell you about the push to end anonymity on the Internet in a moment.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again,
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:27.000]  and once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:38.000]  This message is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[01:30:38.000 --> 01:30:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:42.000 --> 01:30:46.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[01:30:46.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  YouTube has joined Facebook and Google in forcing people to use their real names.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:53.000]  They claim this will make people nicer online,
[01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:58.000]  but in fact there's hard evidence that real name policies don't improve online behavior.
[01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  In 2007, South Korea mandated a real name web policy, then ditched it four years later.
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  Malicious comments decreased by less than 1%,
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:13.000]  but hackers had a field day scooping up valuable real name data.
[01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:17.000]  All this talk about civility is just an excuse to kill anonymity on the web.
[01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  That's because the big boys want real names to sell to real advertisers,
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:24.000]  and eventually to keep the rest of us in line.
[01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000]  I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son on September 11, 2001.
[01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:40.000]  Most people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11.
[01:31:40.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  World Trade Center 7, a 47-story skyscraper, was not hit by a plane.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:48.000]  Although the official exclamation is that fire brought down Building 7,
[01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  over 1,200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  to prove there is more to the story.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  Bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my son.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:31:59.000]  Go to buildingwhat.org.
[01:31:59.000 --> 01:32:02.000]  Why it fell, why it matters, and what you can do.
[01:32:02.000 --> 01:32:05.000]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:32:05.000 --> 01:32:08.000]  It builds muscle, burns fat, improves digestion,
[01:32:08.000 --> 01:32:11.000]  and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:32:11.000 --> 01:32:15.000]  Did you know the U.S. government banned the hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:19.000]  and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:22.000]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years,
[01:32:22.000 --> 01:32:25.000]  and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:29.000]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:35.000]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts
[01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free,
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:50.000]  is anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367,
[01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  Only at hempUSA.org.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:07.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network,
[01:33:07.000 --> 01:33:14.000]  logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:17.000]  Okay, folks, we are back.
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:18.000]  This is a rule of law.
[01:33:18.000 --> 01:33:20.000]  Randy Kelton and Deborah Stevens here.
[01:33:20.000 --> 01:33:35.000]  And going back to this red flag issue and disarmament,
[01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:37.000]  and dealing with lawyers in specific,
[01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:41.000]  and I would say in any kind of like medical, you know,
[01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:44.000]  whether it's a, you know, not just necessarily an allopath,
[01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:47.000]  but any kind of medical practitioner,
[01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:49.000]  you need to ask questions.
[01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:53.000]  Don't just blindly trust these people, okay?
[01:33:53.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  You should understand everything they're doing and why.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:05.000]  You should make them explain to you everything they're doing and why.
[01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:10.000]  And if they have a problem with that, then you need to find somebody else, okay?
[01:34:10.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  I mean, this is one reason why I like working with Harmon Taylor,
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  because he will not work with you unless you thoroughly understand everything that's going on.
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:21.000]  I mean, you've got to understand everything that's going on.
[01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:23.000]  And here's another red flag.
[01:34:23.000 --> 01:34:27.000]  If you take it upon yourself to like do some of your own legal research,
[01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  checking up on your lawyer and something doesn't seem quite right,
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  and you bring some case law to him or her that may seem to like say,
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:39.000]  well, look, you know, I just found this case.
[01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  This may not bode so well for us.
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  If they, you know, flip out or even just a little bit and act like,
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:47.000]  oh, you don't know what you're doing because you're just a layperson,
[01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  I'll do the research, you know, if they act all offended
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:56.000]  and don't want to listen to what you have to say or don't want to look at your research, fired, okay?
[01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  And like Randy said, sometimes red flags don't necessarily mean to get rid of them,
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  but some are so big that it's like, okay, that's it.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  You're out of here, pal.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  So anyways, I just want to put that out there.
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:11.000]  You need to understand everything that's going on.
[01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:12.000]  Yeah.
[01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:18.000]  When I, you know, I do the radio show and when I explain something to somebody,
[01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:23.000]  the only way I know that you understand is by the questions that you ask.
[01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:31.000]  So I'm genuinely trying to take something in my mind
[01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  and transfer it to your mind using sounds I make with my face.
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:41.000]  Yeah, and Randy, tell the listeners what you told me on the break about this woman.
[01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  Okay, I'll get to it.
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  Okay, okay, okay.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  But the only way I know if you're getting what I think I'm putting out is by the questions that you ask.
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  So if you've got a professional and you're asking them questions
[01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:59.000]  and they don't want to answer your questions, for me, that's not a disqualifier,
[01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:01.000]  but it's certainly a red flag.
[01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:11.000]  But then if you bring them an issue and they don't show you precisely why that issue doesn't fit here
[01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  and they just try to imply that you don't know what you're talking about, that's a red flag.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:18.000]  I get two red flags, I'm gone.
[01:36:18.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  I mean, whether I think that it's sufficient or not, I'm gone
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:32.000]  because it is so difficult to tell when you have a professional who's giving you good information and not.
[01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:36.000]  Well, yeah, and if they're not going to answer your questions, I mean,
[01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:41.000]  I won't fire them immediately on the spot because somebody might just be having a bad day or something.
[01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:46.000]  But if it continues perpetually and they're not wanting to answer my questions,
[01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  I'm not going to let that go very long.
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  Yeah, and there's more to that.
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  I'm the pro.
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:55.000]  If you're paying me, I'm the pro.
[01:36:55.000 --> 01:37:05.000]  It's my job to be able to deliver my product to you without generating red flags.
[01:37:05.000 --> 01:37:10.000]  And if I don't know how to do that, you need to get rid of me and find somebody that does.
[01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  Well, yeah, and Randy, they're so used to people who don't think for themselves and who just blindly trust.
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  They don't think they have to do that.
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:22.000]  They don't think they a lot of a lot of them don't think they need to do that.
[01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  And they're quite offended when you question them.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:32.000]  And that should be, you know, it's not necessarily that either one of them is not a disqualifier.
[01:37:32.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  But if I get two red flags from anybody, I'm gone.
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  I just it's the only way I could keep myself out of trouble.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:50.000]  I was sent to bid on a two point five million dollar job at Budweiser and they questioned me about me being able to produce the quality.
[01:37:50.000 --> 01:37:54.000]  And I already demonstrated to them that I develop products.
[01:37:54.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  The quality was a piece of cake.
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  And then they started then they wanted to chisel me down on prices.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:02.000]  I'm going guys, I'm done here.
[01:38:02.000 --> 01:38:04.000]  And I went back to the guy who sent me down there.
[01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  He bought equipment from them when they were doing well.
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  And then when their economies would turn down, he'd sell it back to him.
[01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  He did that with Budweiser and GD and a bunch of companies.
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:17.000]  And he asked me how it went with Budweiser.
[01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  I said I blew him off.
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:21.000]  And he said, well, why?
[01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:24.000]  I said, well, I got two red flags.
[01:38:24.000 --> 01:38:26.000]  And he was up in his 80s.
[01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  He'd been around a while.
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:28.000]  He said two red flags.
[01:38:28.000 --> 01:38:30.000]  I said, yeah, two red flags.
[01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  He didn't even ask me what they were.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:34.000]  He said, oh, OK, I understand.
[01:38:34.000 --> 01:38:37.000]  I never said another word about it.
[01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:39.000]  He'd been around a while.
[01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  So I suggest that if you're dealing with professionals, try to develop red flags.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:59.000]  It's really hard to actually, for certain, understand that somebody is screwing around.
[01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:02.000]  All you can do is develop a set of markers.
[01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:05.000]  Try to find a set of markers and trust.
[01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:08.000]  If you get two of them, trust yourself and just walk away.
[01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:12.000]  Yeah, and everybody's going to have a little bit of a different tolerance
[01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:16.000]  according to their own experience or just their own comfort zone.
[01:39:16.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  And I kind of draw my boundaries a little bit further out than a lot of people do,
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:25.000]  because I don't have patience for it anymore.
[01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:26.000]  I don't have the time.
[01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  I don't have the patience.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:29.000]  I especially don't have the time.
[01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:33.000]  And so it's like some people are willing to put up with more than others.
[01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  I don't put up with much when it comes to that sort of thing.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  The woman I was talking about earlier, our purpose was to sell her,
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:48.000]  get her property sold so that she didn't have a foreclosure or a short sale on her record.
[01:39:48.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  But she was trying to find another apartment to move to.
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  We brought two different buyers, and she blew both of them off
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:39:58.000]  because she hadn't found another apartment yet.
[01:39:58.000 --> 01:40:01.000]  What? This is ridiculous, Randy.
[01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:03.000]  She's in trouble.
[01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:06.000]  She's about to have a foreclosure on her head or short sale.
[01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:11.000]  And she turns down two buyers because she hadn't found an apartment yet.
[01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  She was four days from having her stuff thrown out on the street.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:18.000]  That is so ridiculous.
[01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:19.000]  That is beyond ridiculous.
[01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  That is psychopathic.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:27.000]  After the second one, I told David, I am done here.
[01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  Well, she wouldn't have time anyway, four days, and it would be done.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:35.000]  I sent her a letter that said, we're done here.
[01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  If you sell this property to the buyer that we brought,
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:44.000]  we'll put a $5,000 lien against your property.
[01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  We expect to get paid at closing for bringing the buyer.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:53.000]  If you don't sell it to this person, then we're finished.
[01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  This is not a negotiation.
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:40:58.000]  We are done here.
[01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:01.000]  Now, I have no doubt.
[01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:03.000]  I know exactly what's going to happen.
[01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:06.000]  She's going to blow off this buyer,
[01:41:06.000 --> 01:41:10.000]  and he's going to charge her for his building inspection,
[01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:13.000]  which he had to pay for,
[01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:15.000]  and then they're going to foreclose on her and throw her out.
[01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  It just sounds to me like she wanted more money.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:21.000]  Yeah, and it wouldn't have mattered.
[01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:23.000]  It's an entitlement mentality.
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:25.000]  It would not have mattered.
[01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  We were going to give her half of anything that we saved
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  from the price that the bank claimed,
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:37.000]  but it wouldn't have mattered what we gave her.
[01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:40.000]  Nothing will satisfy her.
[01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:42.000]  That's what my red flags are about.
[01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:47.000]  I get two red flags that I've never been able to satisfy people,
[01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:50.000]  and you need to develop red flags.
[01:41:50.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  And, Randy, some people you just can't make them happy.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:56.000]  There's nothing that you can do to make them happy,
[01:41:56.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  because they don't want to be happy.
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:41:59.000]  If you're dealing with someone,
[01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  and they raise an objection,
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:04.000]  and you address that,
[01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:09.000]  and then they raise an objection to something of a different nature,
[01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:12.000]  I would walk away.
[01:42:12.000 --> 01:42:17.000]  That's my 40 years of doing business with people.
[01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:19.000]  I walk away.
[01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  I'm not going to be able to make this person happy.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:26.000]  In my experience, I never have been able to,
[01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:28.000]  so those are my red flags.
[01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:30.000]  Everybody needs to develop their own,
[01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  but those are mine.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:34.000]  I get two red flags, I'm gone.
[01:42:34.000 --> 01:42:37.000]  You never know if you made the right decision.
[01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:39.000]  That's the hard part.
[01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  You have to find a way to be comfortable with it.
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:45.000]  I walked away from a $2.5 million job,
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:48.000]  and I was comfortable walking away,
[01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:53.000]  because I had crafted out my red flags,
[01:42:53.000 --> 01:43:00.000]  and I had experience with how these kinds of objections play themselves out.
[01:43:00.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  They always play out badly.
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  I walked away with absolute comfort.
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:11.000]  Trying to develop this discernment, it's difficult.
[01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:17.000]  Also, it goes to your confidence and your trust of yourself.
[01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:22.000]  I think it's a good idea to map out some boundaries ahead of time
[01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:29.000]  when you're going into a situation so that a set of ifs and thens.
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:33.000]  If such and such happens, then I'm going to do such and such,
[01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:39.000]  and that way you're not having to second-guess yourself when the time comes,
[01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:41.000]  because you've already thought it through ahead of time,
[01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  and then when that thing happens, then you just make the decision
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  and do it because the decision has already been made,
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  and then there's nothing to worry about because you know you did the right thing
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:54.000]  because you thought it out ahead of time.
[01:43:54.000 --> 01:43:56.000]  All right, and we've got a couple of callers on the board.
[01:43:56.000 --> 01:43:57.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:43:57.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  This is the Rule of Law.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  Sorry.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  What?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:16.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:22.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found
[01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:29.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity,
[01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover,
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  and because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:46.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:53.000]  then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe
[01:44:53.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:44:57.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment
[01:44:57.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:08.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:08.000 --> 01:45:11.000]  an affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:31.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:35.000]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:44.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:44.000 --> 01:45:48.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:48.000 --> 01:45:53.000]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:53.000 --> 01:45:57.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:57.000 --> 01:46:02.000]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:13.000]  Hello. Oh, man, she's in jail.
[01:46:13.000 --> 01:46:23.000]  She got voted, man. Oh, man, I'm voted.
[01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:27.000]  Some things in this world I will never understand.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:32.000]  Some things I realize foolish.
[01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:37.000]  Somebody's gonna police that policeman.
[01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  All right, somebody's gonna police the policeman.
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:43.000]  That's us, right, Randy?
[01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  That's the idea.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  Okay, great.
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  Now, I just wanted to let folks know for folks out there who have smartphones
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:52.000]  and want to listen to the stream on their phone,
[01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:56.000]  I've been told that it's a little bit difficult to be able to pull the stream
[01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:59.000]  through a browser on the phone.
[01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  I realize that, and I'm sorry, folks, I do not have a webmaster.
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:05.000]  I desperately need a webmaster.
[01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  If somebody's out there who's a really good webmaster
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  and wants to help me out, please contact me, okay?
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:12.000]  Because I desperately need help.
[01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:15.000]  I'm doing pretty much everything all by myself around here,
[01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:19.000]  even screening calls while I'm on the air during live segments, okay?
[01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:20.000]  So I need help.
[01:47:20.000 --> 01:47:22.000]  But anyways, if you've got your smartphone
[01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:25.000]  and you want to listen to the live stream on the phone,
[01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:31.000]  download and install the TuneIn app, T-U-N-E-I-N, just like it sounds.
[01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:34.000]  In your app store, I think it's free or may just be a couple of bucks.
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:39.000]  And then you do a station search for Logos Radio Network.
[01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:44.000]  Or you could do a station search for Texas Liberty Radio, TXLR.
[01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:45.000]  They're our affiliates.
[01:47:45.000 --> 01:47:48.000]  If you listen to TXLR, you'll hear Logos when it's live,
[01:47:48.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  and you'll hear some of the GCN programming,
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:55.000]  Alex Jones and Catherine Albrecht and all those good folks during the day.
[01:47:55.000 --> 01:47:56.000]  So that's how you can listen.
[01:47:56.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  I've got the Shoutcast app on my phone.
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:01.000]  We are a Shoutcast stream.
[01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:04.000]  Okay, so, Randy, what do you say we go to some calls here?
[01:48:04.000 --> 01:48:05.000]  Okay.
[01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  Okay, we're going to go to...
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:08.000]  We're in our last segment, so we have to move quickly.
[01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:09.000]  Yeah, we've got Betty from Texas.
[01:48:09.000 --> 01:48:10.000]  Betty, thanks for calling in.
[01:48:10.000 --> 01:48:13.000]  What is your question or comment tonight?
[01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  Well, I just have another story of an attorney throwing a client under the bus.
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:19.000]  Wait one second.
[01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:21.000]  Betty, are you on a speakerphone?
[01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:22.000]  No.
[01:48:22.000 --> 01:48:23.000]  Okay, all right.
[01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:26.000]  Sounds a little muffled, but go ahead.
[01:48:26.000 --> 01:48:29.000]  All right.
[01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  Well, it's hard to believe that somebody that you hire and get to for help
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:48.000]  can just literally totally run over you without any qualms whatsoever, but they do.
[01:48:48.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  So I had an attorney prepare a paper for me, an affidavit for me to sign,
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:08.000]  and after I was beaten up basically from the plaintiffs against me,
[01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:14.000]  and so I went in to ask him to do something to help me,
[01:49:14.000 --> 01:49:20.000]  and he produced an affidavit that had incorrect information on it,
[01:49:20.000 --> 01:49:24.000]  and so he rushed me to sign it, and I signed it,
[01:49:24.000 --> 01:49:28.000]  but as we were walking down the hall as I was leaving, I was saying,
[01:49:28.000 --> 01:49:37.000]  well, you will revise it because that's not correct and all, and basically he didn't.
[01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:46.000]  So the bottom line is that it caused me problems,
[01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  and then the judge used a forgery to restrain me from a homestead,
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:49:59.000]  and then he promptly sold it,
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:10.000]  and I have three different exhibits showing where that signature is definitely a forgery.
[01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:15.000]  It's not even, the name doesn't even spell the same,
[01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  and then when the judge doesn't get the settlement the way he wants it,
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:34.000]  well, he just appoints a guardian over you and gets someone to state and agree to what he wants,
[01:50:34.000 --> 01:50:37.000]  and there you are.
[01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:48.000]  So how do you revise an affidavit that was supposed to have been revised before?
[01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:55.000]  Okay, not enough information to really understand how to answer that question.
[01:50:55.000 --> 01:50:57.000]  I'd need to know more about the affidavit,
[01:50:57.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  but if the lawyer had you sign an affidavit that had incorrect information on it,
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  one thing you can do is rescind your signature on the document.
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:15.000]  Another is you can go after the lawyer himself.
[01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:18.000]  Resend my signature?
[01:51:18.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  Yes, based on lack of full disclosure.
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:29.000]  We have a recent case in Texas, Santiago v. Mackey.
[01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:33.000]  Now, I don't memorize a lot of cases,
[01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  but every once in a while one comes along that's worth it.
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:47.000]  We had someone in a foreclosure situation, and he asked the lender to produce the original document,
[01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:51.000]  and Mackey Wolfe was the law firm, and he said,
[01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  oh, yeah, come on down, we got it here at the office, we'll show it to you.
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:58.000]  The guy went down there, looked at it, he showed him a copy.
[01:51:58.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  The guy walked.
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:06.000]  Next day, he sued Mackey Wolfe for producing a fraudulent document.
[01:52:06.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  He was supposed to produce the original.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:11.000]  He produced a copy.
[01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:12.000]  He sued the lawyer.
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:18.000]  The lawyer said, I'm a lawyer representing a client I'm immune from suit,
[01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:25.000]  and the court said producing fraudulent documents is not the duty of a lawyer to a client.
[01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:29.000]  You have no immunity.
[01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:35.000]  Your lawyer produced what he knew to be a fraudulent document,
[01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:38.000]  and he produced it to your detriment.
[01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:40.000]  He's got deep pockets.
[01:52:40.000 --> 01:52:43.000]  He's got malpractice insurance.
[01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  And I tried to fire him, and the judge wouldn't let me.
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:54.000]  Is this after they appointed you a guardian?
[01:52:54.000 --> 01:52:56.000]  That came later.
[01:52:56.000 --> 01:53:01.000]  Oh, you have lots of things you can do.
[01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:06.000]  These courts are really bad about rolling over people that they think can't fight back,
[01:53:06.000 --> 01:53:15.000]  and that's why I'm looking at putting together this company so that they can fight back.
[01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  Most people don't understand when you go into court, it's like sitting in a four-sided chessboard.
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:23.000]  Right.
[01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:32.000]  You're on one side, your lawyer's to your right, opposing counsel to your left, the judge across from you.
[01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  You have a relationship with your lawyer,
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:40.000]  but your lawyer has a relationship with opposing counsel and with the judge.
[01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  Right.
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:44.000]  They all were against me, every one of them.
[01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:45.000]  Yes.
[01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  So, well, there's a trick that we proceeds can pull on them.
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:53.000]  The trick is you attack your lawyer.
[01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:56.000]  You file bar grievances against him.
[01:53:56.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  You file a malpractice suit against him while he's in the case,
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  and when he files a motion to withdraw, you file an objection to the withdrawal.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:10.000]  Then when the judge grants the objection to the withdrawal, then you sue the judge.
[01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:12.000]  So you guys want to fight?
[01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:15.000]  We'll introduce you to the deep end of the pool.
[01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:19.000]  There's a lot we can do.
[01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:26.000]  Malpractice is limited to how many years?
[01:54:26.000 --> 01:54:29.000]  Wait, say what?
[01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:35.000]  Malpractice for an attorney is limited to how many years?
[01:54:35.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  It varies.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  I think it's four years, but unless there's fraud involved.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:44.000]  Unless there's fraud?
[01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  Well, there definitely was fraud involved.
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  How long ago was this?
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:59.000]  That was 1999, I think it was.
[01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:00.000]  That's 15 years.
[01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:02.000]  That's going to be too long.
[01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:04.000]  It's been going on a long time.
[01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:07.000]  I've been beaten up pretty badly.
[01:55:07.000 --> 01:55:09.000]  Wait a minute.
[01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  When did the court case end?
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:30.000]  Well, they claimed that it ended 2013, but they...
[01:55:30.000 --> 01:55:32.000]  2013?
[01:55:32.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  Yes, but they decided that I should give everything that I have left,
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  that they haven't stolen, to one of my siblings.
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:56:00.000]  And that was done last winter, last December, I think it was.
[01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  So have they had you declared incompetent?
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  I'm assuming that they have, because there's been an attorney that was paid money as a guardian.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:21.000]  The guardians are the worst.
[01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  I know, I know.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:31.000]  I thought it was for my sister, who has actually been fired from jobs, because they said that she was crazy.
[01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  She was fired from a couple of different law firms, but then I found out it was all because I didn't settle,
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  and the judge wanted me to settle so they could rip me some more.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:57:02.000]  But since I know that you don't go into business with anybody in any contract if you don't respect their ethics, shall we say.
[01:57:02.000 --> 01:57:12.000]  So I knew not to do that, and that made him angry, made the judge angry.
[01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:16.000]  No, the judge has no place getting angry.
[01:57:16.000 --> 01:57:22.000]  When I get an angry judge on the stand, I ask him to get off the stand.
[01:57:22.000 --> 01:57:31.000]  If you brought something personal to this case, you need to get out of here and give me the fair and competent jurist I have the right to in the first instance.
[01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:36.000]  Can you, are you familiar with email?
[01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:37.000]  Yes.
[01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:39.000]  Good.
[01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:44.000]  I was going to suggest, if you weren't, get one of your grandkids, they know all about this.
[01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:48.000]  If I have problems with my phone, I go get my grandkids.
[01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:54.000]  But send me an email, and I'll send you some questions.
[01:57:54.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  Let me look into this a bit.
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:57:59.000]  I may have some suggestions for you.
[01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:03.000]  Okay, I've been trying to scan these.
[01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:06.000]  Okay, wait a minute, we are out of time.
[01:58:06.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  My email is, you can find it on our website, Logos Radio Network, or you can, Randy at RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:25.000]  Send me an email, put the subject line in all caps, then I'm sure to see it.
[01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:27.000]  And I'll look this over and get back to you.
[01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:37.000]  We'll be back tomorrow night, if you have more questions or comments, then Mark, I'm sorry we didn't get to you.
[01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:41.000]  But if you call back tomorrow night, we'll pull you up early.
[01:58:41.000 --> 01:58:44.000]  We'll be back for our four-hour info marathon.
[01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  Thank you all for listening, and good night.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:05.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:05.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:12.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:12.000 --> 01:59:21.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:28.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps,
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:52.000]  That's 888-551-0102, or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:52.000 --> 02:00:12.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.