[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000] The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing you daily [00:06.000 --> 00:13.000] bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop [00:13.000 --> 00:21.000] into the tides of the alternative. [00:21.000 --> 00:28.000] Markets for the 16th of October 2015 opened up with gold at $1,182.05 an ounce, silver [00:28.000 --> 00:34.000] at $16.09 an ounce, Texas crude at $46.38 a barrel, and Bitcoin that's on its way up, [00:34.000 --> 00:44.000] currently sitting at roughly $265 U.S. currency. [00:44.000 --> 00:49.000] Today in history, Wednesday, October 16, 2013, the United States ends its 16-day governmental [00:49.000 --> 00:54.000] shutdown and avoids default on its debt by raising the debt ceiling and incurring more [00:54.000 --> 01:00.000] debt in a bipartisan Senate quagmire. [01:00.000 --> 01:05.000] In recent news, a natural gas pipeline explosion in Encino, South Texas, 25 miles north of [01:05.000 --> 01:10.000] Laredo, has forced dozens of people from their homes and canceled classes at a nearby school. [01:10.000 --> 01:14.000] City Manager Velma De Villa says that for safety reasons, 30 to 40 people who lived [01:14.000 --> 01:19.000] near the pipeline evacuated the city hall, stating that classes would be canceled for [01:19.000 --> 01:24.000] today at Encino Elementary School, which is only about 500 yards from the pipeline. [01:24.000 --> 01:28.000] Gas to the line has obviously been cut, and the fire was allowed to burn itself out. [01:28.000 --> 01:32.000] The pipeline operator, San Antonio-based Lewis Energy Group, says that the fire happened [01:32.000 --> 01:35.000] around 4.15 a.m. Central Standard Time Friday morning. [01:35.000 --> 01:37.000] Luckily, nobody was hurt in the blast. [01:37.000 --> 01:44.000] Authorities are seeking the cause. [01:44.000 --> 01:48.000] The Chief Executive offers the 10 of the world's largest oil and gas companies, which together [01:48.000 --> 01:52.000] provide almost a fifth of all the oil and gas production and supply nearly 10 percent [01:52.000 --> 01:56.000] of the world's energy, declared today their collective support for an effective climate [01:56.000 --> 02:00.000] change agreement to be reached at next month's 21st session of the United Nations Conference [02:00.000 --> 02:04.000] of Parties to the UN Framework on Climate Change, or Copenhagen 21. [02:04.000 --> 02:08.000] The CEOs of the 10 companies that currently make up the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative, [02:08.000 --> 02:15.000] or OGCI, are the BG Group, BP, ENI, PEMEX, Reliance Industries, Repsol, Saudi Aramco, [02:15.000 --> 02:20.000] Shell, and Statoil and Total, confirmed in their declaration the following, [02:20.000 --> 02:24.000] quote, Our shared ambition is for a two-degree Celsius future. [02:24.000 --> 02:26.000] It is a challenge for the whole of society. [02:26.000 --> 02:28.000] We are committed to playing our part. [02:28.000 --> 02:31.000] Over the coming years, we will collectively strengthen our actions and investments to [02:31.000 --> 02:35.000] contribute to reducing the greenhouse gas intensity of a global energy mix. [02:35.000 --> 02:39.000] Our companies will collaborate in a number of areas with the aim of going beyond the [02:39.000 --> 02:41.000] sum of our individual efforts. [02:41.000 --> 02:45.000] The OGCI was established following the discussions held during the January 2014 World [02:45.000 --> 02:50.000] Economic Forum annual meetings and was officially launched at the September 2014 UN [02:50.000 --> 02:55.000] Climate Summit. [02:55.000 --> 03:17.000] This has been your Lowdown for October 16, 2015. [03:17.000 --> 03:26.000] Okay. [03:26.000 --> 03:27.000] We are back. [03:27.000 --> 03:29.000] Randy Felton with the Radio. [03:29.000 --> 03:31.000] And we're talking with Faith in California. [03:31.000 --> 03:40.000] Faith, am I to understand that you have a foreclosure yourself that you're working on? [03:40.000 --> 03:44.000] Oh, I've had a foreclosure myself I've been working on for seven years. [03:44.000 --> 03:47.000] Okay. [03:47.000 --> 03:51.000] When I get someone that I first start with, here are some questions that the first thing [03:51.000 --> 04:00.000] I ask them to do is go to the public record, the county recorder, and ask the county [04:00.000 --> 04:03.000] recorder to run a search for you. [04:03.000 --> 04:05.000] Now we start a recorder. [04:05.000 --> 04:10.000] I'm an old guy and I'm computer intolerant. [04:10.000 --> 04:13.000] I don't tell them I'm an electrical engineer. [04:13.000 --> 04:17.000] I'm computer intolerant and I don't understand these things. [04:17.000 --> 04:22.000] Will you run me a search on this property and show me what you find? [04:22.000 --> 04:26.000] And then they give me the printout and they're always real accommodating about that. [04:26.000 --> 04:33.000] Well, I want to keep that printout because it's my position that with the change to [04:33.000 --> 04:36.000] electronic filing there are some issues. [04:36.000 --> 04:39.000] Oh, yeah. [04:39.000 --> 04:43.000] There's a really big issue with electronic filing of these records. [04:43.000 --> 04:46.000] But all the problems aren't worked out yet. [04:46.000 --> 04:52.000] So sometimes you can't find stuff. [04:52.000 --> 04:56.000] So if I go in there and tell them I can't find it and they come in and the other side [04:56.000 --> 05:02.000] comes in and they found it because they filed it under the wife's name or something. [05:02.000 --> 05:04.000] Well, that's a problem for me. [05:04.000 --> 05:11.000] But if I come in there and say, Your Honor, this is what the clerk can find. [05:11.000 --> 05:18.000] If the clerk can't find this document, then even if it is recorded, it's not properly [05:18.000 --> 05:20.000] recorded. [05:20.000 --> 05:28.000] So once I have a list of all of the documents that the clerk can find, then I want to look at it. [05:28.000 --> 05:34.000] Deed of trust first and one of the first things I look for is an assignment. [05:34.000 --> 05:39.000] This is the first thing I want to look at on that assignment. [05:39.000 --> 05:41.000] Who did the assignment? [05:41.000 --> 05:46.000] Was it the original lender or was it MERS? [05:46.000 --> 05:47.000] Was it somebody else? [05:47.000 --> 05:49.000] Often it's somebody else. [05:49.000 --> 05:50.000] If it was... [05:50.000 --> 05:55.000] Usually it's the bank that really finds the deed over to themselves. [05:55.000 --> 05:58.000] Usually it's the original lender. [05:58.000 --> 06:03.000] So first thing I do is check the Internet to see if that original lender is still in [06:03.000 --> 06:04.000] business. [06:04.000 --> 06:10.000] And if it's not in business, which is often the case, was it in business at the time the [06:10.000 --> 06:13.000] assignment was made? [06:13.000 --> 06:22.000] And one key, one clue I get on if MERS is involved, if MERS, if it says that MERS is [06:22.000 --> 06:28.000] doing the assignment as nominee for the lender's successors and assigns, it doesn't name the [06:28.000 --> 06:29.000] lender. [06:29.000 --> 06:31.000] That's a red flag. [06:31.000 --> 06:36.000] 90% of the time when I go back and check, the lender's not in business at the time this [06:36.000 --> 06:38.000] was filed. [06:38.000 --> 06:44.000] Sometimes even when they do name them, the company's not in business. [06:44.000 --> 06:50.000] And then I look at who signed what, when. [06:50.000 --> 07:00.000] I probably find enough to shut down the lender on 99% of the loans I find. [07:00.000 --> 07:04.000] I look at the stuff I'm finding is absolutely horrendous today. [07:04.000 --> 07:05.000] Oh, yeah. [07:05.000 --> 07:06.000] I know. [07:06.000 --> 07:08.000] Today I did one. [07:08.000 --> 07:17.000] And when I opened the Deed of Trust, the one that my partner sent me, it had page one, [07:17.000 --> 07:18.000] then page 10. [07:18.000 --> 07:26.000] And then it had just, it looked like whoever went to file it dropped it outside in the [07:26.000 --> 07:27.000] wind. [07:27.000 --> 07:33.000] Gathered up all these pages and stuck them in and gave them to the clerk and they filed [07:33.000 --> 07:34.000] them. [07:34.000 --> 07:39.000] Well, I opened it, oh, it was a PDF. [07:39.000 --> 07:45.000] I saved it all as images and then walked down the PDF so I could get all the right pages [07:45.000 --> 07:47.000] back in place. [07:47.000 --> 07:48.000] Okay. [07:48.000 --> 07:58.000] And Schedule A, the Appendix A with the property description wasn't there. [07:58.000 --> 08:03.000] I find the most outrageous stuff. [08:03.000 --> 08:06.000] We've got one that's a home equity loan. [08:06.000 --> 08:12.000] There was a Deed of Trust and then there's a release of lien on the Deed of Trust and [08:12.000 --> 08:14.000] then there's a home equity loan. [08:14.000 --> 08:19.000] But they didn't file the home equity loan in the public record. [08:19.000 --> 08:24.000] If they did, I can't find it. [08:24.000 --> 08:33.000] Texas law says a claim against real property not properly acknowledged or proven and filed [08:33.000 --> 08:37.000] in the public record is void as to the holder. [08:37.000 --> 08:42.000] So, I don't care what the bank holds. [08:42.000 --> 08:52.000] If I can't find them in a direct uninterrupted line, then according to Texas law, they can [08:52.000 --> 08:56.000] use their claim for toilet paper. [08:56.000 --> 09:04.000] Washington Mutual, I've got one Long Beach Mortgage and then there's an assignment in [09:04.000 --> 09:14.000] there that says Long Beach Mortgage as I say merged with Washington Mutual or some other [09:14.000 --> 09:17.000] company, then Washington Mutual. [09:17.000 --> 09:21.000] And then I have, it jumps over to Chase. [09:21.000 --> 09:30.000] I was in court at an eviction hearing and filed a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction. [09:30.000 --> 09:35.000] When I find these kinds of issues, they always get a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction. [09:35.000 --> 09:45.000] I maintain that the petitioner lacks standing to invoke subject matter jurisdiction in the [09:45.000 --> 09:49.000] court and that's really important because the only time you can sue a judge is when [09:49.000 --> 09:52.000] he doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction. [09:52.000 --> 10:01.000] So, this was a one with Chase and I told the judge, your honor, the guy who owned the property [10:01.000 --> 10:06.000] gave me a warranty deed, not a warranty deed in the record because the lawyer said, your [10:06.000 --> 10:07.000] honor, I don't know who this guy is. [10:07.000 --> 10:08.000] He doesn't have standing. [10:08.000 --> 10:10.000] I said, well, I have a warranty deed in the record. [10:10.000 --> 10:13.000] Your honor, that warranty deed is bogus. [10:13.000 --> 10:20.000] I said, well, maybe it is, but it's in the record and it's in the record unchallenged [10:20.000 --> 10:26.000] so the court must presume that it is regular. [10:26.000 --> 10:28.000] And the judge said, well, how long has it been in there? [10:28.000 --> 10:29.000] This is August. [10:29.000 --> 10:31.000] I said, your honor, it's been in there since March. [10:31.000 --> 10:35.000] And the judge said, oh, okay. [10:35.000 --> 10:44.000] And then I objected to the lawyer because Chase didn't have standing and they bought [10:44.000 --> 10:47.000] it at foreclosure from Chase. [10:47.000 --> 10:55.000] And I told the judge, there is no assignment from Washington Mutual to Chase in the public [10:55.000 --> 10:56.000] record. [10:56.000 --> 11:00.000] So, Chase has no standing. [11:00.000 --> 11:07.000] And the lawyer said, well, your honor, my client buys lots of properties and he doesn't [11:07.000 --> 11:11.000] have time to go through the record on every one. [11:11.000 --> 11:18.000] And the judge leaped over the bench and said, did I just hear what I thought I heard? [11:18.000 --> 11:20.000] Oh, my God. [11:20.000 --> 11:30.000] Your client paid $368,000 for this property and he didn't have time to spend two minutes [11:30.000 --> 11:33.000] to go to the Internet and look at the public record. [11:33.000 --> 11:40.000] Oh, well, gee, the judge granted the property to him anyway. [11:40.000 --> 11:46.000] This didn't make any difference. [11:46.000 --> 11:49.000] They don't care. [11:49.000 --> 11:52.000] But we do get really good claims. [11:52.000 --> 11:56.000] And I don't take my claims to the JP court anymore. [11:56.000 --> 12:03.000] I like to file them in the state court and get the lender to remove it to the federal [12:03.000 --> 12:09.000] court because we live in Fort Worth and our federal judge is primarily McBride. [12:09.000 --> 12:14.000] And McBride is really a stinker. [12:14.000 --> 12:22.000] Last two I filed, they trespassed a tri-trial, they removed it to the federal court. [12:22.000 --> 12:27.000] The first one, Judge McBride dismissed it with prejudice, out of hand. [12:27.000 --> 12:32.000] As soon as they filed the removal, I didn't file a motion to remand. [12:32.000 --> 12:41.000] I filed a challenge subject matter jurisdiction based on the 2011 Venue and Removal [12:41.000 --> 12:45.000] Clarification Act. [12:45.000 --> 12:52.000] It said that while you can remove a case with state issues to the federal court, [12:52.000 --> 12:55.000] the court must sever the state issues and remand. [12:55.000 --> 12:59.000] This changed 200 years of law. [12:59.000 --> 13:05.000] So since he had to sever and remand, that meant he had no subject matter [13:05.000 --> 13:09.000] jurisdiction over the claims, but he dismissed them with prejudice. [13:09.000 --> 13:18.000] So I told the lawyer, his name was Britt McClung, that he asked me if I was going [13:18.000 --> 13:19.000] to appeal. [13:19.000 --> 13:21.000] I said, no, I'm going to file criminal charges against the judge. [13:21.000 --> 13:23.000] It's a grand jury. [13:23.000 --> 13:25.000] Well, you can do that. [13:25.000 --> 13:27.000] Of course I can. [13:27.000 --> 13:29.000] Arrogant scoundrel. [13:29.000 --> 13:33.000] We see how arrogant he is when a local grand jury is considering him. [13:33.000 --> 13:35.000] I filed a second one. [13:35.000 --> 13:37.000] He removed it. [13:37.000 --> 13:40.000] The judge didn't dismiss this one out of him with prejudice. [13:40.000 --> 13:42.000] He didn't dismiss it at all. [13:42.000 --> 13:46.000] And McClung called me and said, well, we need to get into scheduling orders. [13:46.000 --> 13:47.000] Heck with the scheduling order. [13:47.000 --> 13:49.000] I got a challenge subject matter jurisdiction. [13:49.000 --> 13:51.000] There's going to be no scheduling. [13:51.000 --> 13:52.000] Well, the judge will dismiss it. [13:52.000 --> 13:57.000] I hope he does because I need two complaints so I can establish a pattern. [13:57.000 --> 14:02.000] I do want a shot at McBride. [14:02.000 --> 14:05.000] I take him to a state grand jury. [14:05.000 --> 14:11.000] I once put all the highest judges in Texas in front of a grand jury in Austin. [14:11.000 --> 14:14.000] Well, it really wasn't me. [14:14.000 --> 14:21.000] It was District Attorney Ron Earl, 25 year district attorney. [14:21.000 --> 14:24.000] Not running for office again. [14:24.000 --> 14:25.000] He's a Democrat. [14:25.000 --> 14:27.000] They're all Republicans. [14:27.000 --> 14:30.000] I filed a writ of habeas corpus. [14:30.000 --> 14:33.000] They demanded a motion for leave to file. [14:33.000 --> 14:35.000] I told the clerk, screw that. [14:35.000 --> 14:36.000] This is a habeas. [14:36.000 --> 14:39.000] Everything stands down before the great writ. [14:39.000 --> 14:42.000] The court has no power to grant or deny leave to file. [14:42.000 --> 14:44.000] Well, they wouldn't take it without it. [14:44.000 --> 14:45.000] I'm trying to get a kid out of jail. [14:45.000 --> 14:47.000] So I filed a motion for leave to file. [14:47.000 --> 14:48.000] They denied it. [14:48.000 --> 14:51.000] I went straight to the grand jury. [14:51.000 --> 14:56.000] I hammered them for a year before they finally gave it to the grand jury. [14:56.000 --> 15:04.000] I told the Clared Austin Brown, who handled the grand jury, I said, look, Claire, I've been pound. [15:04.000 --> 15:06.000] I just filed criminal charges against her. [15:06.000 --> 15:16.000] I bushwhacked the head criminal district judge in his courtroom and dumped criminal complaints against her for not giving these to the grand jury. [15:16.000 --> 15:20.000] And I told her, I said, look, Claire, all I want you to do is give it to the grand jury. [15:20.000 --> 15:22.000] I don't want these guys indicted. [15:22.000 --> 15:24.000] Well, then why are you filing this? [15:24.000 --> 15:27.000] I want them to have to look at the prospect. [15:27.000 --> 15:31.000] So under 203, you have no option. [15:31.000 --> 15:33.000] So you don't have to agree with this. [15:33.000 --> 15:35.000] You have to give it to them. [15:35.000 --> 15:41.000] So you give it to them, and then you go in there and argue against indictment, and you get to be the good guy. [15:41.000 --> 15:43.000] And everybody wins here. [15:43.000 --> 15:50.000] I get the judges to have to face an indictment, so they'll stop this nonsense. [15:50.000 --> 15:51.000] Well, she gave it to her. [15:51.000 --> 15:54.000] First day in office. [15:54.000 --> 15:58.000] Two months later, I've heard nothing. [15:58.000 --> 16:01.000] It usually takes them 30 minutes. [16:01.000 --> 16:02.000] And I went to Claire. [16:02.000 --> 16:04.000] I said, what's the deal with the grand jury? [16:04.000 --> 16:12.000] Oh, Mr. Kelton, I made sure every grand jury member read your entire presentment. [16:12.000 --> 16:14.000] Holy mackerel. [16:14.000 --> 16:16.000] My habeas was in there. [16:16.000 --> 16:19.000] There's 111 pages. [16:19.000 --> 16:31.000] That Ron Earl, that dirty rotten scoundrel, he used my complaint to try to take out those 15 Republicans with him when he got out of office. [16:31.000 --> 16:34.000] It's all about the politics. [16:34.000 --> 16:36.000] I didn't get him indicted. [16:36.000 --> 16:44.000] But if you file a habeas with the Court of Criminal Appeals in Texas, they don't ask for no motion for leave to file a crap hole. [16:44.000 --> 16:46.000] They just take it. [16:46.000 --> 16:47.000] Hang on. [16:47.000 --> 16:49.000] Be right back. [16:49.000 --> 16:51.000] Randy Kelton, Wheel of Law Radio. [16:51.000 --> 16:53.000] John, Mark, I'll see you there. [16:53.000 --> 16:54.000] We'll get to you guys. [16:54.000 --> 17:07.000] We'll be right back. [17:24.000 --> 17:36.000] If you're looking for options to reduce food costs without compromising health or securing long-term 25-year storable food for an uncertain future, then non-GMOsolutions.com is your common sense answer. [17:36.000 --> 17:39.000] Take advantage of a 10% discount to promo code LOGOS. [17:39.000 --> 17:46.000] No longer will you compromise taste and quality for full-term shelf life or eat poor quality food due to cost. [17:46.000 --> 17:51.000] Check out our FlexPay options and design a no-contract plan to satisfy your needs. [17:51.000 --> 17:56.000] Visit non-GMOsolutions.com today and get 10% off with promo code LOGOS. [17:56.000 --> 18:01.000] That's non-GMOsolutions.com with promo code LOGOS. [18:01.000 --> 18:07.000] Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition. [18:07.000 --> 18:12.000] People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that. [18:12.000 --> 18:18.000] Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition. [18:18.000 --> 18:26.000] In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. [18:26.000 --> 18:32.000] LOGOS Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. [18:32.000 --> 18:40.000] We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others. [18:40.000 --> 18:48.000] When you order from LOGOSRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio. [18:48.000 --> 18:52.000] As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us. [18:52.000 --> 18:59.000] As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income. [18:59.000 --> 19:01.000] Order now. [19:01.000 --> 19:11.000] You are listening to the LOGOS Radio Network, LOGOSRadioNetwork.com [19:11.000 --> 19:17.000] Well, don't let nothing get to you, or the father can't deliver you. [19:17.000 --> 19:23.000] Don't let bad-minded people hurt you, until Satan gets behind you. [19:23.000 --> 19:31.000] Norman, my friend, Nala Jackson, come on. [19:53.000 --> 19:58.000] He's everything to me, that's why I call him. [19:58.000 --> 20:01.000] I come with me and I pray to him. [20:01.000 --> 20:04.000] Because he's the only one who could answer him. [20:04.000 --> 20:07.000] There's no business with what a good man says. [20:07.000 --> 20:10.000] Mankind, you know, is just leading. [20:10.000 --> 20:13.000] Trust in God, my friend. [20:13.000 --> 20:16.000] Tell your problems then. [20:16.000 --> 20:19.000] I'll say once again. [20:19.000 --> 20:23.000] Trust in God, my friend. [20:23.000 --> 20:26.000] Tell your problems then. [20:26.000 --> 20:29.000] I'll say once again. [20:29.000 --> 20:32.000] Trust in God, my friend. [20:32.000 --> 20:34.000] Okay, we are back. [20:34.000 --> 20:36.000] Randy Kelton, you have our radio. [20:36.000 --> 20:39.000] We're talking to Faith in California. [20:39.000 --> 20:46.000] Faith, I would very much like to talk to you off the air. [20:46.000 --> 20:50.000] We could spin, I could spin two shows. [20:50.000 --> 20:56.000] Just extracting the information from you that I want to know. [20:56.000 --> 21:03.000] Could you send me an email and let's contact one another off the show. [21:03.000 --> 21:05.000] Oh, hold on. [21:05.000 --> 21:06.000] There we go. [21:06.000 --> 21:11.000] I'm sorry I didn't have you unmuted. [21:11.000 --> 21:15.000] Yeah, I just shot one off to you. [21:15.000 --> 21:17.000] Randy, rule of law. [21:17.000 --> 21:19.000] Okay, wonderful. [21:19.000 --> 21:21.000] I'll try to contact you tomorrow or the next day. [21:21.000 --> 21:23.000] When is best for you? [21:23.000 --> 21:25.000] Just put it in an email. [21:25.000 --> 21:28.000] So when's a good time to contact you? [21:28.000 --> 21:30.000] Oh, yeah, tomorrow I'm fine. [21:30.000 --> 21:35.000] Okay, and when I see Frank, I'm going to black his eye. [21:35.000 --> 21:38.000] Because when he sends me someone as knowledgeable as you, [21:38.000 --> 21:41.000] I need to do a pre-interview so I have talking points [21:41.000 --> 21:43.000] and I can lead this along better. [21:43.000 --> 21:47.000] I've been kind of struggling this evening. [21:47.000 --> 21:48.000] I'm sorry. [21:48.000 --> 21:49.000] I do apologize. [21:49.000 --> 21:52.000] I'd like to consider having you as a guest on the show [21:52.000 --> 21:56.000] and go through what you do in more detail. [21:56.000 --> 21:57.000] Okay. [21:57.000 --> 21:59.000] Okay, thank you very much. [21:59.000 --> 22:00.000] I will let you go. [22:00.000 --> 22:01.000] It's been a joy. [22:01.000 --> 22:02.000] I'm truly enriched. [22:02.000 --> 22:04.000] Truly enriched to know you. [22:04.000 --> 22:05.000] Thank you. [22:05.000 --> 22:09.000] Okay, now we're going to go to John in Texas. [22:09.000 --> 22:12.000] Hello, John. [22:12.000 --> 22:13.000] Is this May? [22:13.000 --> 22:14.000] Am I on? [22:14.000 --> 22:17.000] You are on. [22:17.000 --> 22:20.000] Okay, I thought there was somebody in front of me. [22:20.000 --> 22:23.000] No, actually, what was, I should have took Mark. [22:23.000 --> 22:27.000] He dropped off and came back, so his phone was under yours. [22:27.000 --> 22:29.000] But I should have took him first. [22:29.000 --> 22:30.000] And I'm sorry, Mark. [22:30.000 --> 22:31.000] I'm just out of habit. [22:31.000 --> 22:32.000] I took the next one in line. [22:32.000 --> 22:34.000] Come back, May. [22:34.000 --> 22:37.000] Mark, I think, yeah, let me come back to you [22:37.000 --> 22:40.000] because Mark was on early in the show and through the whole show [22:40.000 --> 22:42.000] and then he dropped and came back. [22:42.000 --> 22:45.000] I hate to make him hold on nice. [22:45.000 --> 22:46.000] But hang on, John. [22:46.000 --> 22:49.000] I'll be back to you. [22:49.000 --> 22:55.000] Okay, Mark, what do you have for us tonight? [22:55.000 --> 22:56.000] First, thank you, John. [22:56.000 --> 22:58.000] Very nice of you. [22:58.000 --> 23:01.000] I've been listening to you talking to Faith. [23:01.000 --> 23:05.000] And I have to say that it was an enriching thing to listen to. [23:05.000 --> 23:08.000] And I've heard the show over the last couple of weeks, [23:08.000 --> 23:09.000] but I haven't called in. [23:09.000 --> 23:12.000] So I've missed getting to talk to you. [23:12.000 --> 23:16.000] I wanted to bounce a couple ideas off of you. [23:16.000 --> 23:20.000] As you may know, or may remember, you may not, [23:20.000 --> 23:24.000] I've heard you tell me more than once, hey, man, [23:24.000 --> 23:28.000] you need to get your mind out of the fight and get focused on, [23:28.000 --> 23:32.000] you know, what you think you can reasonably ask for, things like that. [23:32.000 --> 23:35.000] I think that's good advice. [23:35.000 --> 23:40.000] I'm starting to think I may have some more life in the situation I have. [23:40.000 --> 23:46.000] I had a judgment on June 22nd, 30 days later. [23:46.000 --> 23:47.000] It's kind of a little bit of a mess. [23:47.000 --> 23:53.000] It wasn't necessarily even anything that I could see made sense to appeal [23:53.000 --> 23:56.000] at the time. [23:56.000 --> 23:59.000] And now, as far as my case is concerned, [23:59.000 --> 24:03.000] where I had something filed past statute of limitations, [24:03.000 --> 24:09.000] I had a corporate assignment 10 days prior to them filing litigation. [24:09.000 --> 24:14.000] The corporate assignment actually reads that it's prepared by the servicer, [24:14.000 --> 24:19.000] and the original lender is out of business for other cases, [24:19.000 --> 24:20.000] which I could cite. [24:20.000 --> 24:23.000] So it was kind of an interesting thing. [24:23.000 --> 24:26.000] I brought that up before the judge in my hearing. [24:26.000 --> 24:30.000] He didn't hear it, didn't look into it, didn't care. [24:30.000 --> 24:36.000] So I have the ability, I think, 90 days past that judgment [24:36.000 --> 24:38.000] to make a motion to vacate. [24:38.000 --> 24:41.000] And then there's one exception, as I've read the rules here [24:41.000 --> 24:44.000] and I've gotten others to concur. [24:44.000 --> 24:47.000] If there was fraud, then I can make that at any time, [24:47.000 --> 24:51.000] because naturally a void judgment is void any time. [24:51.000 --> 24:54.000] Something to that effect. [24:54.000 --> 24:58.000] Before I forget, the first thing I've got here in the notes, [24:58.000 --> 25:03.000] I wanted to ask you if you could put me in touch with Mark in Wisconsin [25:03.000 --> 25:06.000] as we talked a little bit about a writ of mandamus. [25:06.000 --> 25:11.000] He wanted to get in touch with me, and I emailed you before, [25:11.000 --> 25:13.000] but I don't know if you got it. [25:13.000 --> 25:19.000] Yeah, I got it, and I thought I had emailed that to Mark in Wisconsin. [25:19.000 --> 25:24.000] No, I think Mark said something to me and I emailed it to you. [25:24.000 --> 25:28.000] Well, I'll email you again for sure. [25:28.000 --> 25:30.000] Okay, I'll try it again. [25:30.000 --> 25:33.000] That would be totally fine. [25:33.000 --> 25:38.000] If anybody has any ideas for me or anybody happens to hear me on your show [25:38.000 --> 25:42.000] and they want to be in touch, they absolutely have my permission to share [25:42.000 --> 25:46.000] if you'd be the intermediary and be so kind. [25:46.000 --> 25:54.000] One thing you might consider, if they filed this action out of time [25:54.000 --> 25:58.000] after the statute of limitations had run, [25:58.000 --> 26:02.000] when I read the Texas penal code, [26:02.000 --> 26:08.000] that comes up securing and executing a document by deception. [26:08.000 --> 26:16.000] Now, that's nice. I haven't dug in to all these wonderful things, [26:16.000 --> 26:20.000] but I'm going to look into that. [26:20.000 --> 26:26.000] If I get into that, well, I'm not ready to get into that, [26:26.000 --> 26:28.000] but I want to get into that. Let me say that. [26:28.000 --> 26:35.000] I do want to fight when it comes time to fight and somebody needs a good boot. [26:35.000 --> 26:39.000] Anyway, let me just bounce this off of you. [26:39.000 --> 26:42.000] I just want to comment. [26:42.000 --> 26:47.000] There's a smart man because I keep telling people, [26:47.000 --> 26:51.000] take your battles very carefully. [26:51.000 --> 26:54.000] Spend a lot of time setting them up. [26:54.000 --> 26:56.000] Don't be so quick to go after them. [26:56.000 --> 27:01.000] Give them all the opportunities they need to screw up as much as possible. [27:01.000 --> 27:06.000] Somebody never interfere with your opponent when he's screwing up. [27:06.000 --> 27:09.000] Give him every opportunity to screw up. [27:09.000 --> 27:13.000] Sit back, set him up, figure out how to nail him, [27:13.000 --> 27:17.000] and then pick what you want to go after. [27:17.000 --> 27:19.000] Yeah, yeah. [27:19.000 --> 27:24.000] In light of the show tonight, this is going to be a fine question. [27:24.000 --> 27:31.000] As you have Jeff Cedric ever once in a while on, talking about the FDCPA, [27:31.000 --> 27:33.000] I printed it out. [27:33.000 --> 27:37.000] It's 10 pages in 12-point Times New Roman font. [27:37.000 --> 27:41.000] Even a moron like me can understand it, and I love it. [27:41.000 --> 27:45.000] I clearly have FDCPA violations. [27:45.000 --> 27:51.000] I'm concerned there may be some argument that it might be res judicata [27:51.000 --> 27:56.000] if I'm going after the plaintiff, but the servicer is not the plaintiff. [27:56.000 --> 28:01.000] They are, however, the perpetrator of the fraudulent assignment. [28:01.000 --> 28:06.000] I'm using words that may not necessarily be legal terms, [28:06.000 --> 28:10.000] but I think they're fun to throw around. [28:10.000 --> 28:18.000] Let me address fraudulent as it is defined in Texas. [28:18.000 --> 28:25.000] This is local government code 51901C. [28:25.000 --> 28:30.000] If a document is filed in the public record, [28:30.000 --> 28:35.000] and there is nothing in the record showing that the filer has standing [28:35.000 --> 28:42.000] to file the document, the document is presumed to be fraudulent. [28:42.000 --> 28:51.000] Now, that's a special definition of fraud as opposed to fraud as a cause of action or a claim. [28:51.000 --> 28:55.000] So when you claim the document is fraudulent, [28:55.000 --> 28:59.000] you're not accusing the person of committing fraud. [28:59.000 --> 29:06.000] You're saying that the document doesn't meet the filing requirements for standing. [29:06.000 --> 29:14.000] Yeah. Now, you know, that would be amazing because it's not as hard to show. [29:14.000 --> 29:19.000] What shall we say? [29:19.000 --> 29:21.000] Let's use the FDCPA lingo. [29:21.000 --> 29:30.000] This false and misleading presumably valid corporate assignment of mortgage [29:30.000 --> 29:34.000] that was filed with the courts in the state of Arkansas. [29:34.000 --> 29:38.000] I hear your bumper music. I'll hang. [29:38.000 --> 29:42.000] Okay. Hang on. We'll be right back. [29:42.000 --> 29:45.000] This is Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio. [29:45.000 --> 29:49.000] I call it number 512-646-1984. [29:49.000 --> 29:50.000] It's a little bit longer break, [29:50.000 --> 29:56.000] so you might go look at our sponsors on logosradionetwork.com [29:56.000 --> 29:59.000] and check them out, support the network. [29:59.000 --> 30:03.000] We'll be right back. [30:03.000 --> 30:07.000] Is that a Harley I hear? If so, I hope the driver's wearing a helmet. [30:07.000 --> 30:11.000] Motorcycle fatalities are way up, and you won't guess among which age group. [30:11.000 --> 30:15.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment. [30:15.000 --> 30:17.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:17.000 --> 30:20.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:20.000 --> 30:25.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [30:25.000 --> 30:30.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [30:30.000 --> 30:33.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [30:33.000 --> 30:36.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [30:36.000 --> 30:40.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [30:40.000 --> 30:44.000] Start over with StartPage. [30:44.000 --> 30:48.000] When you hear the word motorcycle, most of us think of youthful rebellion. [30:48.000 --> 30:53.000] You know, some teenage couple zipping down the highway with the wind whipping through their hair. [30:53.000 --> 30:59.000] What you don't picture is the driver on that Harley being a middle-aged baby boomer or even a retiree. [30:59.000 --> 31:05.000] Fact is, though, older people are riding motorcycles more than ever and dying in greater numbers, too. [31:05.000 --> 31:10.000] Federal accident data shows motorcycle deaths have climbed 25 percent in 10 years. [31:10.000 --> 31:15.000] Half the riders were age 40 or older, and nearly a quarter were older than 50. [31:15.000 --> 31:21.000] So if you're planning on hitting the highway, wear a helmet and go easy on those hairpin turns. [31:21.000 --> 31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [31:52.000 --> 32:01.000] Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at SQSA.org. [32:01.000 --> 32:05.000] Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar. [32:05.000 --> 32:08.000] In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society, [32:08.000 --> 32:10.000] and if we the people are ever going to have a free society, [32:10.000 --> 32:13.000] then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights. [32:13.000 --> 32:16.000] Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place, [32:16.000 --> 32:20.000] the right to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law. [32:20.000 --> 32:26.000] Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process. [32:26.000 --> 32:29.000] Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio, [32:29.000 --> 32:34.000] has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is [32:34.000 --> 32:36.000] and how to hold courts to the rule of law. [32:36.000 --> 32:41.000] You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. [32:41.000 --> 32:46.000] By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, [32:46.000 --> 32:51.000] and the audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material. [32:51.000 --> 32:55.000] Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. [32:55.000 --> 33:22.000] Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve. [33:22.000 --> 33:27.000] Okay, we are back, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Mark in Texas. [33:27.000 --> 33:34.000] Okay, Mark, where were we talking about fraud? [33:34.000 --> 33:40.000] Not doing too well, but anyway, what I was going to frame up is this. [33:40.000 --> 33:49.000] I have a corporate assignment of mortgage that is clearly false and misleading, probably just downright fraudulent, [33:49.000 --> 33:52.000] and I brought it up in the hearing. [33:52.000 --> 33:57.000] The judge didn't hear it because, as was being discussed earlier, [33:57.000 --> 34:02.000] the plaintiff's attorney just said, I didn't have the ability to challenge that. [34:02.000 --> 34:04.000] And he just, you know, listened to what she was saying. [34:04.000 --> 34:07.000] The guy didn't even know the clue. [34:07.000 --> 34:15.000] Now, in order to take the next step, I've got an option to take a writ of mandamus [34:15.000 --> 34:20.000] because he went ahead and heard this case even though subject matter jurisdiction [34:20.000 --> 34:24.000] was never affirmatively pled by the plaintiff's attorney. [34:24.000 --> 34:26.000] That's one possibility. [34:26.000 --> 34:29.000] I could take that and I could lose. [34:29.000 --> 34:33.000] But right now, I like this idea. [34:33.000 --> 34:43.000] I like both, but I'm thinking that I might possibly file an FDCPA lawsuit that focuses on the servicer. [34:43.000 --> 34:49.000] And this corporate assignment of mortgage says, prepared by, and it has the name of the servicer. [34:49.000 --> 34:57.000] And in fact, the person signing the document itself is an employee of the servicer. [34:57.000 --> 35:01.000] There are multitudes of affidavits and other cases that attack this person. [35:01.000 --> 35:05.000] I'll put certified copies, you know, to work for me in the future perhaps [35:05.000 --> 35:09.000] if we try to vacate the judgment for fraud where I can show it. [35:09.000 --> 35:11.000] But here's the question. [35:11.000 --> 35:19.000] If I attack the servicer through an FDCPA suit, they've done lots of things they couldn't do. [35:19.000 --> 35:22.000] I'm still within the one year statute of limitations for a lot of things. [35:22.000 --> 35:24.000] But I've got a question. [35:24.000 --> 35:31.000] Could I early on make a motion for pre-litigation discovery? [35:31.000 --> 35:41.000] Okay, you have to read the rules on pre-litigation discovery in Alabama. [35:41.000 --> 35:48.000] But most states have pre-litigation discovery that match the federal law. [35:48.000 --> 35:57.000] And what the federal law does is allow you to do pre-litigation discovery for the purpose of preserving testimony. [35:57.000 --> 36:05.000] And it allows you to subpoena and depose individuals to collect their testimony. [36:05.000 --> 36:10.000] So that is probably a great thing to do. [36:10.000 --> 36:13.000] Now, in Texas, we have more that we can do. [36:13.000 --> 36:20.000] But in your case, you have a particular individual that you won't want to depose. [36:20.000 --> 36:25.000] And while you were talking, there was a question that kept coming to my mind [36:25.000 --> 36:30.000] when you were questioning about whether or not to go to the servicer. [36:30.000 --> 36:38.000] The question is, what do you really know about what was done? [36:38.000 --> 36:45.000] Now, there were documents filed and they were supposedly filed for the benefit of certain individuals. [36:45.000 --> 36:57.000] But how do you know that the lender or the alleged holder had anything to do with his filing these documents? [36:57.000 --> 37:06.000] Oh, well, what I know and what I believe are pretty close to one another, but not perfectly reconciled. [37:06.000 --> 37:09.000] It's really important that you make that distinction. [37:09.000 --> 37:18.000] What you know is that you have a document and it has this guy's signature on it. [37:18.000 --> 37:23.000] Now, he made assertions in the document. [37:23.000 --> 37:27.000] Those assertions may or may not be true. [37:27.000 --> 37:35.000] But you do know, he may have made assertions that he acted for the benefit of someone else. [37:35.000 --> 37:37.000] That may or may not be true. [37:37.000 --> 37:40.000] You don't know that. [37:40.000 --> 37:44.000] But you do know he signed this document. [37:44.000 --> 37:50.000] You have evidence to indicate that this document was filed out of time. [37:50.000 --> 37:51.000] Yeah. [37:51.000 --> 38:03.000] So the document made assertions and allegations that they were doing certain things. [38:03.000 --> 38:08.000] When I say out of time, I'm talking about the foreclosure. [38:08.000 --> 38:17.000] They're making assertions that they intend to do certain things that they don't have authority to do. [38:17.000 --> 38:34.000] Now, that's in the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, I'm sorry, Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, 15 U.S. Code 1692E, I believe. [38:34.000 --> 38:37.000] I'll read it. You bet. [38:37.000 --> 38:47.000] So if you threaten to take an action that you either don't intend to take or don't have authority to take, it's a violation of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. [38:47.000 --> 39:07.000] But also if Alabama has a code that's really well complete, it's also going to be tampering with government document or special code Texas has securing and executing a document by deception. [39:07.000 --> 39:15.000] So not only is it going to be invalid on its face, it's criminal. [39:15.000 --> 39:18.000] Oh, yeah, that's good. [39:18.000 --> 39:25.000] So that should criminal should get filed as a matter of course. [39:25.000 --> 39:30.000] But you never mentioned the criminal in the civil. [39:30.000 --> 39:37.000] If the other side mentions the criminal in the civil, ask for sanctions against it. [39:37.000 --> 39:47.000] It's forbidden to use the criminal to gain leverage in the civil. So you file the criminal in separate. [39:47.000 --> 39:51.000] Never mention it in the civil side. [39:51.000 --> 39:55.000] Let the other guy come in and complain about it. [39:55.000 --> 39:59.000] And as soon as he does, ask for sanctions. [39:59.000 --> 40:01.000] Without a doubt. [40:01.000 --> 40:02.000] Yuck, yuck. [40:02.000 --> 40:11.000] There's maybe two or three lawyers in the entire state that know something about FCCPA. [40:11.000 --> 40:15.000] Every bankruptcy attorney should know something about FCCPA. [40:15.000 --> 40:24.000] All of their clients, many of whom probably are having a hard time paying them, have got some kind of issue, I would figure, most of the time. [40:24.000 --> 40:36.000] But anyway, with respect to these violations, I'm hoping that if I can just simply get away with doing pre-litigation discovery, [40:36.000 --> 40:43.000] maybe deposing the person who signed that corporate assignment of mortgage, [40:43.000 --> 40:52.000] then I have a situation there where I can take whatever the answer is, I'm sure, and go back and make a motion to vacate the judgment. [40:52.000 --> 40:57.000] The question would be, and here's an interesting thing to bounce off of you, you'll know, probably. [40:57.000 --> 41:02.000] If I win an FCCPA suit, I win $1,000 here, $1,000 there. [41:02.000 --> 41:09.000] I don't know if it has to be filed as multiple suits or all at once, but you win $1,000 per violation. [41:09.000 --> 41:12.000] And then you win actual damages. [41:12.000 --> 41:18.000] And in my case, although I haven't paid it and they haven't come after me, they haven't garnished my earnings, [41:18.000 --> 41:23.000] my actual damages are in excess of $200,000 in terms of this judgment. [41:23.000 --> 41:36.000] So if I go and win that, then I assume I'll probably be in a good position to win a judgment in excess of $200,000. [41:36.000 --> 41:42.000] They'll probably appeal that. They'll probably lose. But I don't know. [41:42.000 --> 41:52.000] Anyway, if I won the FCCPA suit and then I were to go back and seek to vacate the judgment, [41:52.000 --> 41:58.000] then do I actually lose my damages? Is that a shooting lesson? [41:58.000 --> 42:05.000] No, no. Once they did the deal, the harm was done. [42:05.000 --> 42:11.000] Ah, okay. So I can't undo that harm by vacating this judgment. [42:11.000 --> 42:17.000] Right. So I walk up and I pop you upside the jaw and knock the tooth out. [42:17.000 --> 42:27.000] And you sue me and I have to pay for the tooth. Am I done? [42:27.000 --> 42:31.000] It hurt and I can't unhurt it. [42:31.000 --> 42:41.000] So no, if you win that judgment, that's just for the FCCPA claim. [42:41.000 --> 42:48.000] Now you have Rez Judicata to come back and claim that the foreclosure was improper. [42:48.000 --> 42:55.000] Oh, yeah. Well, that's what I was hoping. But I was worried, if you have any insights, [42:55.000 --> 43:02.000] I was worried here that if I were to attack the plaintiff in any way, they can say, [43:02.000 --> 43:09.000] this has already been decided. This is not an issue that's proper to be heard again or questioned again [43:09.000 --> 43:13.000] or mentioned again. This should be swept under the rug. [43:13.000 --> 43:20.000] I think you have analyzed that correctly. You won't be able to come back to them [43:20.000 --> 43:25.000] unless you can get something else to pry that door back open with. [43:25.000 --> 43:33.000] Okay. So the people that I really need to attack are the people whose names have not really been [43:33.000 --> 43:39.000] the point of any target, but the servants are not the plaintiffs in this case. [43:39.000 --> 43:42.000] Exactly. Okay. Hang on. I'm about to go to break. [43:42.000 --> 44:02.000] We'll be right back. [44:02.000 --> 44:08.000] Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store [44:08.000 --> 44:14.000] at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas, find Brave New Books and Chase Bank [44:14.000 --> 44:18.000] to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. [44:18.000 --> 44:22.000] Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine. [44:22.000 --> 44:26.000] Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil, [44:26.000 --> 44:30.000] lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. [44:30.000 --> 44:38.000] Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com. [44:38.000 --> 44:43.000] That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. [44:43.000 --> 44:47.000] Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products. [44:47.000 --> 45:01.000] Naturespureorganics.com. [45:01.000 --> 45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [45:04.000 --> 45:08.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, [45:08.000 --> 45:15.000] easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step. [45:15.000 --> 45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [45:19.000 --> 45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [45:23.000 --> 45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [45:28.000 --> 45:34.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. [45:34.000 --> 45:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [45:39.000 --> 45:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [45:43.000 --> 45:49.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, [45:49.000 --> 45:52.000] pro se tactics, and much more. [45:52.000 --> 46:02.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ. [46:02.000 --> 46:24.000] Music [46:24.000 --> 46:30.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking Mark in Texas. [46:30.000 --> 46:34.000] So, yeah, I think you got that sorted out. [46:34.000 --> 46:39.000] I'd like the idea of going after peripherals. [46:39.000 --> 46:46.000] I'm working on a municipality here in Texas right now, [46:46.000 --> 46:54.000] and in order to get them in the position I want them in, I'm going after peripherals. [46:54.000 --> 47:00.000] They arrested this woman and took her to another municipality. [47:00.000 --> 47:05.000] Wonderful. Now I get to go after that municipality, [47:05.000 --> 47:12.000] and they're going to be real unhappy because they just did what they were told. [47:12.000 --> 47:15.000] They didn't realize that it was all screwed up, [47:15.000 --> 47:22.000] so if you got this guy working for the servicer and you charge him criminally, [47:22.000 --> 47:25.000] he's going to get real excited, [47:25.000 --> 47:32.000] and most likely he will be able to claim good-faith reliance on competent authority. [47:32.000 --> 47:37.000] But when he does that, he throws his boss under the bus, [47:37.000 --> 47:40.000] and then you get to walk up the tree. [47:40.000 --> 47:50.000] So you're likely to get something definitive that you can then take back to the original court [47:50.000 --> 47:58.000] and show that the lender came to the table with unclean hands. [47:58.000 --> 48:04.000] Oh, you've been awful quiet there since I had you muted. [48:04.000 --> 48:06.000] Oh, sorry. [48:06.000 --> 48:16.000] Just saying, I really like that because there's a case in the state where I've got this issue [48:16.000 --> 48:20.000] that seems to be a real breath of fresh air. [48:20.000 --> 48:26.000] It says MERS cannot act in any capacity as an assignor. [48:26.000 --> 48:30.000] It says that MERS can't act in the capacity to foreclose. [48:30.000 --> 48:32.000] MERS doesn't receive payments. [48:32.000 --> 48:34.000] MERS can simply record things. [48:34.000 --> 48:40.000] So in this case, the employee for the servicer who signed this document, [48:40.000 --> 48:48.000] which was prepared by the servicer and on its face looks as though it's taking the original lender [48:48.000 --> 48:55.000] or MERS or whatever relationship and making an assignment from them to the plaintiff [48:55.000 --> 49:02.000] that just won this judgment, more or less in this situation, [49:02.000 --> 49:05.000] there's no way that that could have happened. [49:05.000 --> 49:10.000] As you mentioned before, a dead man could not have made this assignment. [49:10.000 --> 49:16.000] This was an assignment that they made in an effort to enrich themselves, no doubt, [49:16.000 --> 49:19.000] and that's pretty obvious. [49:19.000 --> 49:25.000] Who affirmed the assignment? [49:25.000 --> 49:29.000] Whose signature is on it? [49:29.000 --> 49:35.000] The signature is that of an employee of the servicer, [49:35.000 --> 49:43.000] and this guy is attacked in multiple other cases by affidavits from Lynn Simoniak [49:43.000 --> 49:46.000] and other peoples. [49:46.000 --> 49:48.000] I thought, I'll put that in front of the judge. [49:48.000 --> 49:51.000] That's reason to doubt. [49:51.000 --> 49:56.000] Maybe I'll do a mortgage compliance investigator's investigation [49:56.000 --> 49:58.000] and uncover some things. [49:58.000 --> 50:02.000] I would do that before I would ask someone, an attorney, [50:02.000 --> 50:07.000] to do pre-mitigation discovery in the FDCPA case. [50:07.000 --> 50:10.000] Per FDCPA, attorneys get their fees paid. [50:10.000 --> 50:14.000] If you can find an attorney that understands what you need them to do [50:14.000 --> 50:19.000] relative to the other case, and most of them hold their hands up and scream [50:19.000 --> 50:23.000] and run away, I've talked to a lot of people, [50:23.000 --> 50:29.000] but I've got one that does seem to have some of the right stuff. [50:29.000 --> 50:34.000] I'm going to suggest that what your problem is with lawyers [50:34.000 --> 50:38.000] is the reason they throw their hands up and run away [50:38.000 --> 50:43.000] is because you know as much about the subject as they do, [50:43.000 --> 50:46.000] and they can't screw you and throw you under the bus, [50:46.000 --> 50:50.000] and they don't want anything to do with you. [50:50.000 --> 50:53.000] A knowledgeable client tends to terrify lawyers, [50:53.000 --> 50:56.000] unless the lawyer is really sharp and really confident, [50:56.000 --> 51:04.000] and for the most part reputable. [51:04.000 --> 51:11.000] I've found one person that I really think I can believe in. [51:11.000 --> 51:19.000] I almost paid a couple thousand bucks to a guy to help me make a motion to vacate. [51:19.000 --> 51:25.000] He's very sharp, went to Vanderbilt Law, GPIA, and in any event, [51:25.000 --> 51:28.000] he just really wanted to make a motion. [51:28.000 --> 51:35.000] He had told me, it's pretty unlikely this judge is going to want to overturn his own judgment. [51:35.000 --> 51:38.000] I'm like, yeah, I figure that's true. [51:38.000 --> 51:41.000] As I looked into it a little further, I could have made an argument. [51:41.000 --> 51:44.000] It would have been logical. It would have been legal. [51:44.000 --> 51:47.000] But when I was in the hearing, that's exactly what I did. [51:47.000 --> 51:55.000] The plaintiff's attorneys didn't even touch the issue of statute of limitations properly, [51:55.000 --> 51:58.000] and they didn't affirmatively plead much of anything. [51:58.000 --> 52:02.000] They didn't really have to, based on the way that this all worked out. [52:02.000 --> 52:05.000] I kind of know how this works at this point. [52:05.000 --> 52:10.000] I didn't expect it was going to be that bad, but I heard you tell me, [52:10.000 --> 52:13.000] yes, you're just setting the record for appeal. [52:13.000 --> 52:17.000] If I were to order that transcript, which is going to cost a lot of money, [52:17.000 --> 52:23.000] this was about a four-hour, five-hour hearing, maybe, for whatever reason. [52:23.000 --> 52:29.000] And I did a lot of things wrong, but I did everything that I really needed to do [52:29.000 --> 52:33.000] in order to set the record for appeal in some good way. [52:33.000 --> 52:36.000] But I'm looking at this and thinking, why do I need to go through this? [52:36.000 --> 52:42.000] A local attorney here, who is a great foreclosure fighter but can't help me where I really need help, [52:42.000 --> 52:49.000] he said, if the Circuit Court didn't have jurisdiction, the Appeals Court doesn't have jurisdiction. [52:49.000 --> 52:53.000] And I'm like, okay, I like the sound of that, that he's the first person who said, [52:53.000 --> 53:00.000] you need a writ of mandamus, and that might be some fun yet to have as well. [53:00.000 --> 53:07.000] But anyway, that may be a way to handle it, get the Court of Appeals to rule [53:07.000 --> 53:14.000] that the court doesn't, in a mandamus, that the trial court never had subject matter jurisdiction. [53:14.000 --> 53:17.000] And they can dismiss the case. [53:17.000 --> 53:23.000] You know, here's a question, and this will frame it up, and then I'll shut up [53:23.000 --> 53:29.000] and let John, who's been very kind, have as much time as he needs. [53:29.000 --> 53:32.000] But you've helped me a great deal here. [53:32.000 --> 53:38.000] If I file an FDCPA case for violations, which are clear, [53:38.000 --> 53:45.000] and they have used false and misleading statements, practices, things, [53:45.000 --> 53:51.000] they violated things in the 12 or 20-plus letters I have from last year, [53:51.000 --> 53:58.000] if I win that FDCPA case, actual damages to me, excess of 200,000 bucks, [53:58.000 --> 54:05.000] if I win that FDCPA case, I can immediately come back and make a motion to vacate that judgment, [54:05.000 --> 54:11.000] sue them for fraud, and I'm set up looking very sweet in a very rare instance, [54:11.000 --> 54:16.000] potentially to get three times damages for this fraud, I suspect. [54:16.000 --> 54:19.000] This could have been worth quite a bit of money. [54:19.000 --> 54:22.000] Does that ring true with your thinking? [54:22.000 --> 54:25.000] Yes, it does. [54:25.000 --> 54:29.000] Because I'm thinking, wow. [54:29.000 --> 54:32.000] Originally, I went from thinking I'm completely screwed, [54:32.000 --> 54:35.000] I don't have a leg to stand on, I'm in big trouble, [54:35.000 --> 54:39.000] to thinking, you know what, just because I paid a little bit of attention, [54:39.000 --> 54:43.000] I started to wake up, I started to listen to people who were telling me, [54:43.000 --> 54:46.000] you don't have any rights, but what you assert, [54:46.000 --> 54:51.000] that was Steve Skidmore, thank him very much, I started learning, [54:51.000 --> 54:57.000] and I started realizing, oh my God, this is something that it requires [54:57.000 --> 55:00.000] an incredible amount of time, an incredible amount of dedication. [55:00.000 --> 55:04.000] I've learned a great deal from you and yours, and thank you very much for it. [55:04.000 --> 55:08.000] You are welcome, and all of the time you put into this, [55:08.000 --> 55:15.000] tomorrow and the next day and next year, it will come back and serve you well. [55:15.000 --> 55:18.000] No doubt, it's empowerment. [55:18.000 --> 55:24.000] You've got one thing that I hope everybody can come to understand. [55:24.000 --> 55:28.000] There is always something you can do. [55:28.000 --> 55:33.000] The law is very well written, it's very sophisticated, [55:33.000 --> 55:37.000] and we have lots of lawyers that don't want to lose their cases [55:37.000 --> 55:40.000] and want to keep billing their clients, so they've got all these laws passed [55:40.000 --> 55:45.000] to make sure there's always something else you can do. [55:45.000 --> 55:48.000] Okay. [55:48.000 --> 55:52.000] I'm going to use the system against itself in that sense, [55:52.000 --> 55:57.000] and I'm going to do that with this full knowledge in the back of my mind [55:57.000 --> 56:07.000] that this system actually is me, and I'm a part of it, and I need to make it work. [56:07.000 --> 56:08.000] Anyway. [56:08.000 --> 56:10.000] Okay, I appreciate you. [56:10.000 --> 56:15.000] This is why we do the show, is to create more people like you out there [56:15.000 --> 56:19.000] who will hammer these guys. [56:19.000 --> 56:23.000] I'm so unworthy at this point, but I tell you, I'm going to do it. [56:23.000 --> 56:26.000] Whenever I do, as I do, I'll be back. [56:26.000 --> 56:29.000] I'm sure I'll have other questions within a month or so, [56:29.000 --> 56:32.000] but I feel so much better about things. [56:32.000 --> 56:34.000] I thought I was screwed in June. [56:34.000 --> 56:37.000] I left that hearing feeling completely whipped and stupid [56:37.000 --> 56:41.000] and realizing, oh my God, I did some really basic things that I shouldn't have done [56:41.000 --> 56:45.000] that I knew not to do for listening to you and Steve, [56:45.000 --> 56:51.000] and then I thought, it's not that bad, and started digging, and here I am. [56:51.000 --> 56:53.000] But, man, thank you very much. [56:53.000 --> 56:59.000] Good, wonderful, and good luck, and keep us up to speed. [56:59.000 --> 57:04.000] I'm going to email you because if Mark in Wisconsin has anything to share, [57:04.000 --> 57:08.000] I'd love to have it, and most definitely, [57:08.000 --> 57:12.000] if she didn't mention, I didn't hear everything earlier, [57:12.000 --> 57:18.000] but I think Faith in California might possibly have some good capacities [57:18.000 --> 57:25.000] to use the FDCPA as a way to attack her situation a little bit too. [57:25.000 --> 57:31.000] Yes, I want to talk to her so I can kind of vet her knowledge out [57:31.000 --> 57:38.000] so that we can do a more, a show with her as a guest so we can, [57:38.000 --> 57:45.000] I'll have talking points so I can extract more of her knowledge on the air. [57:45.000 --> 57:49.000] I was kind of caught off guard there. [57:49.000 --> 57:50.000] Yeah. [57:50.000 --> 57:55.000] Next time I see Frank Waldo, I'm going to knuckle his head for not telling me. [57:55.000 --> 57:57.000] Yeah. [57:57.000 --> 57:58.000] All right, thanks. [57:58.000 --> 57:59.000] Okay. [57:59.000 --> 58:00.000] Have a good night. [58:00.000 --> 58:01.000] Thank you, Mark. [58:01.000 --> 58:05.000] Okay, now we're going to go to John in Texas. [58:05.000 --> 58:10.000] And John, I'm sorry, we've only got 44 seconds left in this segment, [58:10.000 --> 58:13.000] so we'll pick you up on the other side. [58:13.000 --> 58:17.000] It's the top of the hour break, so it's a three-minute break. [58:17.000 --> 58:21.000] So it would be a good time to go look at Juris imprudent, [58:21.000 --> 58:24.000] Juris imprudent, Juris Dictionary. [58:24.000 --> 58:29.000] If you like what we do here and you'd like to be able to better understand it [58:29.000 --> 58:32.000] and being able to take on your own issues. [58:32.000 --> 58:35.000] Absolute primary three requisite Juris Dictionary. [58:35.000 --> 58:40.000] It will tell you all you, pretty well all you need to know [58:40.000 --> 58:43.000] to know how to begin to address your case. [58:43.000 --> 58:50.000] Hang on, Randy Kelton, Drill Law Radio, we'll be right back. [58:50.000 --> 58:54.000] Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God? [58:54.000 --> 58:59.000] Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books [58:59.000 --> 59:01.000] that can really help. [59:01.000 --> 59:04.000] The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive [59:04.000 --> 59:06.000] study Bibles available today. [59:06.000 --> 59:09.000] It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes [59:09.000 --> 59:13.000] that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life. [59:13.000 --> 59:18.000] The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:18.000 --> 59:21.000] Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life [59:21.000 --> 59:25.000] clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ, [59:25.000 --> 59:27.000] and how to build up the church. [59:27.000 --> 59:30.000] To order your free New Testament Recovery Version [59:30.000 --> 59:33.000] and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, [59:33.000 --> 59:40.000] call Bibles for America toll free at 888-551-0102. [59:40.000 --> 59:44.000] That's 888-551-0102. [59:44.000 --> 59:52.000] Or visit us online at bfa.org. [59:52.000 --> 01:00:00.000] You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com. [01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000] The following use flash is brought to you by the Low Star Lowdown, [01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000] providing the daily bulletins for the commodities market, [01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:10.000] Today in History, [01:00:10.000 --> 01:00:12.000] News Updates, [01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:21.000] and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternatives. [01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:27.000] Markets for the 16th of October 2015 opened up with gold at $1,182.05 an ounce, [01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:29.000] silver at $16.09 an ounce, [01:00:29.000 --> 01:00:32.000] Texas crude at $46.38 a barrel, [01:00:32.000 --> 01:00:44.000] and Bitcoin is on its way up, currently sitting at roughly $265 U.S. currency. [01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:47.000] Today in History, Wednesday, October 16, 2013, [01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:50.000] the United States ends its 16-day governmental shutdown [01:00:50.000 --> 01:00:53.000] and avoids default on its debt by raising the debt ceiling [01:00:53.000 --> 01:01:00.000] and incurring more debt in a bipartisan Senate quagmire. [01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:04.000] In recent news, a natural gas pipeline explosion in Encino, South Texas, [01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:06.000] 25 miles north of Laredo, [01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:08.000] has forced dozens of people from their homes [01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:10.000] and canceled classes at a nearby school. [01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:13.000] City Manager Velma Davila says that for safety reasons, [01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:17.000] 30 to 40 people who lived near the pipeline evacuated to City Hall. [01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:21.000] Stated that classes would be canceled for today at Encino Elementary School, [01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:23.000] which is only about 500 yards from the pipeline. [01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:28.000] Gas to the line has obviously been cut, and the fire was allowed to burn itself out. [01:01:28.000 --> 01:01:31.000] The pipeline operator, San Antonio-based Lewis Energy Group, [01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:35.000] says that the fire happened around 4.15 a.m. Central Standard Time Friday morning. [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:37.000] Luckily, nobody was hurt in the blast. [01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:44.000] Authorities are seeking the cause. [01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:47.000] The chief executive officers of 10 of the world's largest oil and gas companies, [01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:50.000] which together provide almost a fifth of all the oil and gas production [01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:53.000] and supply nearly 10 percent of the world's energy, [01:01:53.000 --> 01:01:56.000] declared today their collective support for an effective climate change agreement [01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:00.000] to be reached at next month's 21st session of the United Nations Conference of Parties [01:02:00.000 --> 01:02:04.000] to the U.N. Framework on Climate Change, or Copenhagen 21. [01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:09.000] The CEOs of the 10 companies that currently make up the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative, or OGCI, [01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:16.000] are the BG Group, BP, ENI, Pemex, Reliance Industries, Repsol, Saudi Aramco, Shell, [01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:20.000] and Statoil and Total, confirmed in their declaration the following, [01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:26.000] quote, Our shared ambition is for a two-degree Celsius future and is a challenge for the whole of society. [01:02:26.000 --> 01:02:27.000] We are committed to playing our part. [01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:30.000] Over the coming years, we will collectively strengthen our actions and investments [01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:35.000] to contribute to reducing the greenhouse gas intensity of a global energy mix. [01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:40.000] Our companies will collaborate in a number of areas with the aim of going beyond the sum of our individual efforts. [01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:46.000] The OGCI was established following the discussions held during the January 2014 World Economic Forum [01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:52.000] Annual Meetings and was officially launched at the September 2014 U.N. Climate Summit. [01:02:52.000 --> 01:03:16.000] This has been your Lowdown for October 16, 2013. [01:03:22.000 --> 01:03:38.000] Okay, we are back. [01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:40.000] Randy Kelton, Wheel of Life Radio. [01:03:40.000 --> 01:03:42.000] And hold on just a moment, John. [01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:45.000] We've got Jeff Sedgwick on the line. [01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:47.000] And he had a comment for Mark. [01:03:47.000 --> 01:03:50.000] Go ahead, Jeff. [01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:55.000] Okay, Mark, there are a couple of things I want you to do for yourself. [01:03:55.000 --> 01:04:00.000] One, I want you to sit down with your mortgage or deed or trust and your note, [01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:05.000] and I want you to take a pencil and paper and copy them word for word. [01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:06.000] That's one. [01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:09.000] You'd be amazed what's in there that you haven't seen so far. [01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:14.000] Two, you make sure that your mortgage or deed or trust has a statement in there [01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:23.000] about they may assign the mortgage or deed or trust without advanced knowledge. [01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:29.000] True, they can without advanced knowledge, but not without any knowledge. [01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:36.000] And since they are required to send it to you, you have standing to challenge the assignment. [01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:46.000] So now you've got two reasons to vacate or avoid judgment, standing and denial of due process. [01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:48.000] How about that, Randy? [01:04:48.000 --> 01:04:54.000] Okay, denial of due process, is that going to lack a proper notice? [01:04:54.000 --> 01:05:09.000] No, it's going to the judge deny him the ability to challenge the assignment. [01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:13.000] I'm thinking about that in terms of due process. [01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:15.000] Okay. [01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:20.000] He has an interest in that assignment because it is mentioned and discussed [01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:24.000] inside the deed or trust or mortgage, it is a contract. [01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:27.000] He has an interest in it by way of the contract, [01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:33.000] and he has the authority to challenge it because he has an interest in it. [01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:38.000] Denying the ability to challenge that denial of due process. [01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:41.000] That is very interesting. [01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:45.000] I knew I kept you around for some reason. [01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:47.000] Yeah, my wife keeps me around for things too, [01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:54.000] like doing laundry and sweeping floors and carrying out the trash. [01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:02.000] Yeah, scrubbing the toilet, crawling under the house for the dead cats. [01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:07.000] Okay, that is an interesting point. [01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:12.000] Rick Tornini, he's a business partner of mine in California. [01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:21.000] I just went to the Court of Appeals on the Glaskey case, Glaskey, Jenkins, California. [01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:25.000] We spoke to this briefly earlier, [01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:30.000] and the whole issue was they were claiming you didn't have standing, [01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:38.000] but with Glaskey and Jenkins both, they're arguing generic standing. [01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:51.000] Nobody addressed the reference to the assignment being in the deed or trust, in the contract. [01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:54.000] Well, let's go a little bit further. [01:06:54.000 --> 01:07:01.000] If that assignment occurred after they passed the Saving Your Homes Act, [01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:06.000] they are mandated by federal law to notify you in writing [01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:10.000] that the assignment has taken place and where the assignment is recorded. [01:07:10.000 --> 01:07:12.000] 2009. [01:07:12.000 --> 01:07:14.000] They haven't recorded it. [01:07:14.000 --> 01:07:15.000] Pardon? [01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:18.000] 2009 that went into effect. [01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:25.000] Okay, so if they haven't recorded it and they haven't notified him again, [01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:30.000] he has interest in it by virtue of the fact that they are supposed to notify him. [01:07:30.000 --> 01:07:34.000] They've reached Covenant 16. [01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:37.000] I've covered it, 15 and 16. [01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:39.000] That's one of the reasons why I suggest to him. [01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:44.000] 15 goes to notice, 16 goes to abiding by all laws. [01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:48.000] Right, and one of the reasons why I suggest to him, [01:07:48.000 --> 01:07:54.000] and everybody else that's got foreclosure problems or situations, [01:07:54.000 --> 01:07:59.000] you will do yourself a very serious disservice [01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:04.000] if you do not sit down with the mortgage or deed or trust and a note [01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:15.000] and a pencil and paper and copy them, word for ever-loving word, [01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:18.000] because you will find that there are dispensers in there, [01:08:18.000 --> 01:08:21.000] up one side and down the other. [01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:30.000] Because you have to read it hand-eye, those two connections will lock it in your brain. [01:08:30.000 --> 01:08:33.000] Right, yes. [01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:37.000] And as I said, you will see, I don't care if you've read the document a hundred times, [01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:41.000] you'll still see things in there when you sit down and write it word for word [01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:46.000] that you didn't see before. [01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:48.000] Okay? [01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:51.000] And that is a very good idea. [01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:52.000] Yes. [01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:54.000] Okay, I need to find the time to do that. [01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:58.000] And that was my contribution to your caller in Alabama. [01:08:58.000 --> 01:09:03.000] As much as I know about it, it would probably do me more good to do that [01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:10.000] than somebody who doesn't know anything about it. [01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:12.000] It will not hurt anybody. [01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:16.000] It will take up some time, but it won't hurt anyone to do that. [01:09:16.000 --> 01:09:19.000] Even if you don't have a foreclosure situation, [01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:24.000] you can see what it is that you actually bound yourself into. [01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:27.000] Exactly. [01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:34.000] Okay, John in Texas, you're probably going to have some comments for him as well. [01:09:34.000 --> 01:09:36.000] Okay, I'll stand by. [01:09:36.000 --> 01:09:38.000] John, where are we? [01:09:38.000 --> 01:09:42.000] Where are you now in the foreclosure process? [01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:47.000] Okay, they tried to get me out of the house. [01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:50.000] I went to JP Court and I won it. [01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:52.000] Whoa. [01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:54.000] Whoa. [01:09:54.000 --> 01:09:57.000] Good news. [01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:01.000] They appealed it into the county court. [01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:06.000] Wait a minute, who was the JP? [01:10:06.000 --> 01:10:10.000] That lady, Mrs. Wright, Judge Wright. [01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:12.000] Jacqueline Wright. [01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:13.000] Yes, yes, yes. [01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:23.000] She may well be the most honest JP we have in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. [01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:29.000] And I owe her a serious apology. [01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:36.000] I filed an information request in her court demanding all of her emails. [01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:40.000] Who did they get excited? [01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:43.000] And she even talked to me about it and told me, you know, [01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:47.000] I told her what I was looking for, she could help me find it. [01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:50.000] And I said, well, if I did that, Your Honor, [01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:55.000] and what I was looking for is not there, she said, I understand. [01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:02.000] But now I have to go back and apologize to her because I wasn't looking at anything for her. [01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:11.000] If there was anyone I expected not to find anything improper with, it was her. [01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:17.000] I did that so I would find out the kind of shenanigans the prosecutor was going to pull. [01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:21.000] And then I go after Richie and Hayes, primarily Hayes. [01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:24.000] I think Hayes is a real scoundrel. [01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:27.000] And they all kind of hate me. [01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:36.000] Except Judge Wright, I believe she actually seems to understand that I'm not the ogre they all think I am. [01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:38.000] So I'm really pleased to hear that. [01:11:38.000 --> 01:11:41.000] How did you beat this one? [01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:47.000] Well, they have a limit of $10,000 in the court. [01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:56.000] And I told them that I told her I was going to file a $630,000 tax lien. [01:11:56.000 --> 01:11:59.000] Well, that kind of upset her a little bit. [01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:00.000] Now, this is all legit. [01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:07.000] This is what taxes at the time are just kind of pulling out of my head, $630,000. [01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:11.000] And anyway, I won it. [01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:25.000] Well, about 13 days later, I get a letter from the county clerk's office saying that they have appealed it to the county court. [01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:29.000] So they said I had eight days to file an answer. [01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:30.000] And I did. [01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:32.000] And I filed for a jury. [01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:35.000] Well, I got to pushing my pencil. [01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:47.000] And I put in there that the servicer, which is they don't have, it's impossible for them to have authority because they never file the [01:12:47.000 --> 01:13:02.000] clinic with the United States Securities Exchange Commission, and I told them it's $4,300,000 in taxes that they owed, [01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:09.000] and that I will have a file stamp copy from the internal revenue. [01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:17.000] See, I made 84 payments, and it's $50,000 per payment plus the money. [01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:24.000] My payment was $543.21. [01:13:24.000 --> 01:13:29.000] That's taxed at 100%. [01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:30.000] Okay. [01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:36.000] There's also another tax of 115%. [01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:43.000] Well, anyway, I'm going to adjust it up to $4 million. [01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:46.000] It's just a little over $600,000. [01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:53.000] I'll have a file stamp on that also with the internal revenue. [01:13:53.000 --> 01:14:00.000] There's a lot of stuff that I could talk about, and it's like 45 minutes to talk. [01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:03.000] You know, probably I need to go from the beginning to the end. [01:14:03.000 --> 01:14:06.000] I really think I could hit a lot of people. [01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:08.000] It doesn't make sense. [01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:19.000] Now, my promissory note that was converted to an investment security that was converted to a bond, [01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:23.000] that's what it was supposed to have been done, but it was never converted. [01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:24.000] Okay, John. [01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:28.000] I would like to do a show with you. [01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:34.000] But before I do a show with you, I'd like to do a vet-out interview. [01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:40.000] There's one thing, and this is common with serious researchers. [01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:48.000] We spend too much time by ourselves studying and researching, and we forget how to talk to human beings. [01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:56.000] You have so much information, you don't need all of the referential index that we do. [01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:02.000] We need to be able to lead directly from one place to the next to the next [01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:11.000] and make links that we can use to go back down this trail and find all this information. [01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:19.000] It's one of the hardest things for me doing this show is trying to keep in mind what people don't know [01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:30.000] or references that I'm making that I haven't clearly stipulated so you can understand where I'm going to. [01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:34.000] It is a struggle, and before we do a show with you, [01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:45.000] I would like to spend a couple hours just walking through how to do this referential index. [01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:53.000] Okay, so why don't we do this, try to get together face-to-face this next week and maybe get a little talk next Friday. [01:15:53.000 --> 01:16:00.000] Now, this is my opinion. I think I've found another way to win a case. [01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:10.000] You can take—I know I'm kind of skimming—you can take your deed of trust and get a certified copy of it, [01:16:10.000 --> 01:16:20.000] turn right around, and re-file it under a special deposit, and you're going to start making payments. [01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:24.000] You may not make a first payment, but that's going to be a special deposit, [01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:30.000] which is going to be different than a general deposit. [01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:34.000] I run five computers at the same time. [01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:37.000] Now, I don't think we can go to break. [01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:41.000] We have to get a break. Hang on. This is Randy Charlton, Wheelbarrow Radio. [01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:51.000] I call it number 512-646-1984, and just thinking about five computers at the same time gives me a headache. [01:16:51.000 --> 01:17:00.000] We'll be right back on the other side. [01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits? [01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method. [01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:14.000] Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two. [01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:20.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes, [01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:26.000] what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and phone calls, [01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:31.000] how to get debt collectors out of your credit report, how to turn the financial tables on them [01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:34.000] and make them pay you to go away. [01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:38.000] The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:41.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:46.000] For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, [01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:49.000] or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com. [01:17:49.000 --> 01:18:01.000] That's RuleOfLawRadio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now. [01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:05.000] At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination [01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000] by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price. [01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000] We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals. [01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:19.000] We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors. [01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:24.000] We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists. [01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000] If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it. [01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:32.000] In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollenburps. [01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:39.000] We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more. [01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:43.000] We broke through Metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment. [01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:46.000] Call us at 512-646-6440. [01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:51.000] We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson. [01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:54.000] We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2. [01:18:54.000 --> 01:19:00.000] Visit us at capitalcoin and bullion.com or call 512-646-6440. [01:19:24.000 --> 01:19:52.000] If I can't get everything I want, if I can't get everything I need [01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:58.000] We were having way too much fun on the break at the expense of our producer. [01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:03.000] Okay, we're back with John in Texas. [01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:19.000] John, the last thing you told us is about refiling the deed of trust and making payments to a special, making a special deposit as opposed to a general deposit. [01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:23.000] And I don't know what a general deposit is. [01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:26.000] Okay, you go down to the bank and you just, you know, make a deposit. [01:20:26.000 --> 01:20:29.000] That's the general deposit. [01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:31.000] That's a deposit in an account. [01:20:31.000 --> 01:20:34.000] That's different than a payment on a debt. [01:20:34.000 --> 01:20:41.000] Yeah, you know, you take it out of your checkbook and back and that's just a general deposit. [01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:46.000] But if you put on there the wording, which is on my computer that I shut down a while ago, [01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:49.000] it makes it specific. [01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:50.000] I'll give you an example. [01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:56.000] If you go down there and deposit gold, they've got to give you that gold back. [01:20:56.000 --> 01:21:05.000] If you go in there and make a five, $20 bill, they're holding that as a special deposit. [01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:11.000] And if you want that back, say I want my five, the original ones with serial numbers on, that's a special deposit. [01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:18.000] Okay, what I'm leading up to, now I've got the case law in my computer that I cut off. [01:21:18.000 --> 01:21:26.000] But what you do is you refile it, you put this wording on it, and when you get it back, you put on there, [01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:32.000] this is a notice, and you put this on there so the county clerk will not give you a hard time [01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:44.000] because you're noticing it, and it merges the equitable title as well as the legal title. [01:21:44.000 --> 01:21:47.000] Okay, none of this makes sense. [01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:48.000] I know it. [01:21:48.000 --> 01:21:56.000] Yeah, how does making a special deposit merge titles? [01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:00.000] Okay, I can't think of it. [01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:02.000] Okay, the titles have been separated. [01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:09.000] The beneficiary holds equitable title, the trustee holds legal title unless Merge is involved, [01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:12.000] and then it says Merge holds legal title, which is confusing. [01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:15.000] But those two have been separated. [01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:18.000] How does this re-merge them? [01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:30.000] Okay, Merge has not existed since 1998. [01:22:30.000 --> 01:22:35.000] Okay, that's a really broad statement. [01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:41.000] Now, that takes us to a whole other place, a whole discussion of how did Merge, [01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:49.000] how did Merge cease to exist in 1998, came into existence in 95? [01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:57.000] In 98, Merge as a corporation exists, but they did not since 98 make an agreement [01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:02.000] with the service company, well, this is Bank of America that I'm involved with, [01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:08.000] but they have not made an agreement for the assignment, [01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:12.000] and to handle their assignments with Bank of America. [01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:21.000] So, you're saying when you say agreement, do you mean a written agreement? [01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:22.000] Yes. [01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:27.000] Could they have an unwritten agreement? [01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:28.000] That's correct. [01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:29.000] They never... [01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:39.000] Well, if they do business with one another, then there must be at least some implied agreement, [01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:44.000] because the fact that there's not agreement doesn't mean the company doesn't exist. [01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:50.000] No, no, the company exists, but they do not exist since 98, [01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:59.000] because they did not have an agreement of authority with Bank of America. [01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:04.000] Okay, so having a problem with the verbiage, [01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:14.000] you're saying that Merge had no business relationship with Bank of America since 1998, [01:24:14.000 --> 01:24:17.000] not that they didn't actually exist. [01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:20.000] That's correct. [01:24:20.000 --> 01:24:28.000] Okay, what does that mean in terms of deed of trust and special deposit? [01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:32.000] That means the assignments are no good. [01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:38.000] And what does that mean concerning the... [01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:42.000] We were talking about special and general deposits, [01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:47.000] and part of the problems are going all over the place. [01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:52.000] And from one sentence to the next, I have no idea where you're at. [01:24:52.000 --> 01:25:00.000] Okay, let me continue with the special deposit compared to the general deposit. [01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:01.000] Okay. [01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:04.000] When you start doing a special deposit, [01:25:04.000 --> 01:25:15.000] that makes you the borrower or the depositor or the beneficiary. [01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:18.000] How does that make you the beneficiary? [01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:21.000] The fact that you deposit money. [01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:27.000] Now, you make that deposit, do you open an account to deposit the money in? [01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:30.000] As a special deposit. [01:25:30.000 --> 01:25:34.000] Where do you deposit that money? [01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:36.000] In the bank. [01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:40.000] In an account or just in the bank generally? [01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:43.000] Yeah, and you write on the check. [01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:49.000] I'll tell you what, I'll just pull it up. [01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:51.000] Just give me one minute here. [01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:55.000] In other words, the wording that you put on it, on your check, [01:25:55.000 --> 01:25:59.000] you don't have to make a new deposit. [01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:01.000] Just give me a few seconds and I'll pull it. [01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:07.000] Oh, okay, so you're writing a check on an account that you have [01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:14.000] and depositing that check into what? [01:26:14.000 --> 01:26:20.000] In your checking account, I'm dialing down here to get the wording. [01:26:20.000 --> 01:26:22.000] It's like, give me an example. [01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:27.000] You settle with an insurance company and then they write on the back of their check, [01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:33.000] you're agreeing to... [01:26:33.000 --> 01:26:37.000] I'm trying to talk to you. [01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:41.000] I'm pulling this up. [01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:46.000] It's like you go to an insurance company and they give you a check [01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:49.000] and they put like a whole paragraph on the back of the check. [01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:54.000] You're agreeing to the money that you're accepting, that you're not going to sue us, [01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:58.000] you're not going to do this, that, and the other. [01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:00.000] Okay. [01:27:00.000 --> 01:27:04.000] Again, understand I'm trying to do two things at the same time here, [01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:06.000] trying to get the wording on that. [01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:16.000] Anyway, there's a wording that you put on the back of your check and it gets to that. [01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:19.000] Okay, well this is... [01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:23.000] It's real deep what I'm talking about. [01:27:23.000 --> 01:27:26.000] Yeah, apparently it's real deep. [01:27:26.000 --> 01:27:31.000] But in a nutshell, I just spend my life... [01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:33.000] Okay, while you're waiting for that to come up, [01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:38.000] generally what is the net result of making these... [01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:46.000] Okay, we're saying that by making these special deposits that you became the beneficiary [01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:52.000] or you merged the beneficial and legal titles. [01:27:52.000 --> 01:27:53.000] Correct. [01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:55.000] And the... [01:27:55.000 --> 01:27:58.000] How does that merge the titles? [01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:04.000] We have two different entities that generally hold each of those. [01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:13.000] How does filing a special deposit merge the two? [01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:15.000] Well, I'm getting confused here. [01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:17.000] I'm trying to pull with... [01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:20.000] Ah, just found it. [01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:30.000] Okay, when you refile the deed of trust as a special deposit, [01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:34.000] you put on the back of the check when you make the deposit. [01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:36.000] Here's what the wording is. [01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:40.000] Notice that it's to declare an intent or purpose of this tender payment [01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:46.000] as a special deposit order of the payor and beneficiary [01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:50.000] and is to be credited to the depositor's account as accord [01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:57.000] and satisfaction and payment in full and discharge of any and all outstanding liability. [01:28:57.000 --> 01:29:06.000] Okay, well, the problem with that is you have a clause in the contract. [01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:09.000] I believe it's in the note. [01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:13.000] I probably should write both of them down so I'll know where this is. [01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:28.000] Is where it addresses a notation on a check that purports to extinguish the debt. [01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:35.000] So people used to do that, say, if you sign this check, the debt is paid in full. [01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:38.000] Well, the companies would mix it. [01:29:38.000 --> 01:29:41.000] So they put in the contract, the provision for that, [01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:46.000] and you sign, put that on a check that it was to have no force in effect. [01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:49.000] Hang on, Randy Kelton, we've got a radio. [01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:53.000] I'll call you the number, 512-646-1984. [01:29:53.000 --> 01:30:03.000] We will be right back. [01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:06.000] Man meets woman on Craigslist and invites her over for a date, [01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:09.000] and then his wife comes home unexpectedly. [01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:10.000] What to do? [01:30:10.000 --> 01:30:11.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, [01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:15.000] and I'll tell you how one cheating husband got what he deserved next. [01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:17.000] Privacy is under attack. [01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:20.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:30:20.000 --> 01:30:25.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too. [01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:30.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [01:30:30.000 --> 01:30:33.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging onto. [01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:36.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [01:30:36.000 --> 01:30:40.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [01:30:40.000 --> 01:30:44.000] Start over with StartPage. [01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:48.000] In Colorado, 24-year-old Kevin Gaylor invited a woman he'd met on Craigslist [01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:51.000] to come by his house for a meet and greet. [01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:54.000] Just two things conspired to make this a bad idea. [01:30:54.000 --> 01:30:58.000] One, Gaylor was married, and two, his wife came home unexpectedly [01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:01.000] just moments before his new friend rang the bell. [01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:03.000] Did he fess up, you're wondering? Nope. [01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:09.000] Instead, he called 911 and for some kooky reason claimed that his date was an armed burglar. [01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:12.000] Officers rushed to the house, but the facts soon came out, [01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:15.000] and Gaylor was promptly arrested for making a false report. [01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:20.000] Somehow, I'm guessing he spent a safer night in jail than he would have at home. [01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:30.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:30.000 --> 01:31:36.000] This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:38.000] The government says that fire brought it down. [01:31:38.000 --> 01:31:43.000] However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition. [01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:49.000] And thousands of my fellow force responders are dying. [01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:51.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm not a structural engineer. [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000] I'm a New York City correction officer. I'm an Air Force pilot. [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:58.000] I'm a father who lost his son. We're Americans, and we deserve the truth. [01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000] Go to RememberBuilding7.org today. [01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:32.000] to handle your claim and your roof right the first time. [01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000] Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:41.000] Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, [01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:45.000] and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming. [01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:50.000] So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking. [01:32:50.000 --> 01:32:56.000] That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com. [01:32:56.000 --> 01:32:58.000] Discounts are based on full roof replacement. [01:32:58.000 --> 01:33:01.000] Me and I actually be kidding about chemtrails. [01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:04.000] You are listening to the Logos Radio Network. [01:33:04.000 --> 01:33:27.000] LogosRadioNetwork.com [01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:57.000] LogosRadioNetwork.com [01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:06.000] Okay, we are back. Jeff Sedgwick, ruler of our radio, and we're talking to John in Texas. [01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:10.000] Okay, John, this is part of something we have to handle. [01:34:10.000 --> 01:34:13.000] We probably need to handle this off the air [01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:20.000] so we can get something that we can talk about where we can move in one straight logical line. [01:34:20.000 --> 01:34:26.000] The one thing that's peculiar about me is I'm an engineer. [01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:31.000] And as an engineer, all I can do is connect dots together. [01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:39.000] And when I'm listening to a presentation, I'm putting all the dots in place. [01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:44.000] And then sometimes I come across a place where I don't have a dot, [01:34:44.000 --> 01:34:52.000] where a conclusion has been drawn that has not been stipulated. [01:34:52.000 --> 01:34:54.000] That's where I get stuck. [01:34:54.000 --> 01:34:57.000] Engineers can't pass those kinds of things. [01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:00.000] We've got to have every single dot in place. [01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:03.000] Otherwise, we wind up deluding ourselves. [01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:07.000] We accept unstated presuppositions. [01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:16.000] And on the break, Jeff Sedgwick and I was talking about Edward John Lynn Miller. [01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:18.000] Jeff, what's the guy's name? [01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:20.000] David Wynne Miller, I believe. [01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:22.000] David Wynne Miller, I think. [01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:31.000] And he put together this whole new language that shows that we thought we were saying one thing, [01:35:31.000 --> 01:35:33.000] but actually we were saying something else. [01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:40.000] And he put this whole language together all based on unstated and unspoiled presuppositions. [01:35:40.000 --> 01:35:48.000] He said, this is so, and since this is so, and this over here is so, then this third thing is so. [01:35:48.000 --> 01:35:53.000] And since this third thing is so, and this fourth thing is so, this fifth thing is so. [01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:55.000] And I said, wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:58.000] I didn't buy the first one. [01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:02.000] So he's pretty stringing together all these assumptions [01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:09.000] without tying all the dots together to support the underlying assumption. [01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:12.000] Am I making sense here, John? [01:36:12.000 --> 01:36:19.000] You've studied all of this, and you've got this understanding, [01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:25.000] and you have internal connections, but you're not telling us all of them, [01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:28.000] because they're apparently not coming to mind. [01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:32.000] So I wind up with missing dots, and I'm confused. [01:36:32.000 --> 01:36:36.000] Okay, let me say this right here. [01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:42.000] Under Section 301, effective treating of special deposit, this is... [01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:43.000] Okay, hold on. [01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:50.000] 301, would that be UCC 3-301, 3.301? [01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:52.000] No, it's CJS. [01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:56.000] We call it corpus judis spectrum. [01:36:56.000 --> 01:36:57.000] Okay. [01:36:57.000 --> 01:36:58.000] That's how you pronounce it. [01:36:58.000 --> 01:36:59.000] I just know it's CJS. [01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:02.000] That's corpus juris secundum. [01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:06.000] That's a legal encyclopedia. [01:37:06.000 --> 01:37:11.000] Yes, Section 301, effective treating as a special deposit. [01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:17.000] I quote, when a deposit for a special purpose is treated as a special deposit [01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:24.000] rather than a general deposit, title to the fin remains in the depositor, [01:37:24.000 --> 01:37:31.000] and the bank becomes an agent, bailee, or trustee rather than a debtor. [01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:34.000] It switches. [01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:41.000] Yes, but it doesn't affect a separate contract, which the deed of trust is. [01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:44.000] That's a contract between you and the bank. [01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:55.000] And you put the special deposit, you put that in the custody of the bank. [01:37:55.000 --> 01:38:03.000] So the bank doesn't have, they have actual possession, but not constructive possession. [01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:07.000] You still hold constructive possessions. [01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:15.000] So title to the property, title to whatever the property is that you put into special deposit, [01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:21.000] like if it's money, you still hold that money, and the bank's just holding it for you [01:38:21.000 --> 01:38:26.000] as opposed to your depositing, a general deposit into an account [01:38:26.000 --> 01:38:35.000] where the bank can then take that money and circulate it to your business purposes. [01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:39.000] Kind of like putting something in a safe deposit box. [01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:40.000] The bank... [01:38:40.000 --> 01:38:43.000] I have a stupid question for you, Randy. [01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:46.000] Yes. [01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:53.000] Is Corpus Juris Secundum and Encyclopedia of Law, or is it law? [01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:57.000] It is not law. [01:38:57.000 --> 01:38:59.000] It's like a dictionary, it's not law. [01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:03.000] It's an encyclopedia. [01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:08.000] It can't be cited, you can't cite the encyclopedias. [01:39:08.000 --> 01:39:14.000] There's Corpus Juris Secundum, and there's American jurisprudence, [01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:18.000] and there's three or four of them. [01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:21.000] Right. [01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:27.000] But the bank does not have, they never transferred it. [01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:30.000] That's why they owe so much tax. [01:39:30.000 --> 01:39:39.000] There is no nexus between that deposit and any real property. [01:39:39.000 --> 01:39:48.000] There would be no tax on that because the bank never took possession of it. [01:39:48.000 --> 01:39:50.000] Nor did they pay for it. [01:39:50.000 --> 01:39:51.000] They didn't need to. [01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:54.000] It's just like what you put in your safe deposit box. [01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:57.000] If you go into your safe deposit box and put a million bucks in there, [01:39:57.000 --> 01:40:00.000] the bank don't have to account for that. [01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:02.000] They don't pay tax on it. [01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:07.000] It's theirs, like a rock. [01:40:07.000 --> 01:40:10.000] Because the bank really doesn't have actual possession. [01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:15.000] They only have constructive possession. [01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:19.000] Don't let the U.S. Marshals get you doing that because they'll arrest you for it. [01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:26.000] Do they go to put cash in a safe deposit box? [01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:32.000] The point is, is the bank, from the way you're describing the special deposit, [01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:37.000] the bank really doesn't have actual possession. [01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:42.000] They have constructive possession, but you still hold actual possession. [01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:45.000] So they can't do anything with that. [01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:51.000] But that one doesn't have anything to do with the deed of trust. [01:40:51.000 --> 01:40:56.000] Well, in my situation, I'm saying the deed of trust is always no good [01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:00.000] because it was never transferred. [01:41:00.000 --> 01:41:04.000] That's a different issue. [01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:10.000] I can say the sky is yellow, but does that make it yellow? [01:41:10.000 --> 01:41:18.000] There is no authority for what you say. [01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:24.000] When we have something to say, we say somebody else has an authority. [01:41:24.000 --> 01:41:29.000] I have the documents from the Security Exchange Commission that it was never filed. [01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:33.000] It doesn't mean anything. [01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:36.000] It doesn't mean anything. [01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:39.000] It just means it's not subject to the Security Exchange Commission. [01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:41.000] That's all. [01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:47.000] Say I'm the judge, John, and you tell me that I'm going to say so what. [01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:52.000] Assume that everything you're going to say, the judge is going to say so what. [01:41:52.000 --> 01:41:55.000] You have to tell me what. [01:41:55.000 --> 01:41:59.000] So it wasn't filed in the Security Exchange Commission. [01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:04.000] What are the statutory requirements for filing, [01:42:04.000 --> 01:42:09.000] and what is the effect of a failure to file? [01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:13.000] Okay, this is what I did. [01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:17.000] You're not answering the question put to you, sir. [01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:24.000] The thing about is, let me tell you what I did, and I'll answer your question as I go. [01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:26.000] Okay. [01:42:26.000 --> 01:42:30.000] I took my, I got a certified copy of my birth certificate, [01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:35.000] and I put on there that I am the registered owner. [01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:41.000] Okay, because I'm the registered owner and gave notice to the Security Exchange Commission, [01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:44.000] I own that. [01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:48.000] I also file an IRS form 56 with the court. [01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:50.000] Okay, hold on, hold on. [01:42:50.000 --> 01:42:56.000] I'm not sure of what you meant by own that. [01:42:56.000 --> 01:43:00.000] I have a birth certificate that I went down to the county where I was born [01:43:00.000 --> 01:43:04.000] and got me two or three copies of them, and I own all three of them. [01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:06.000] They're mine. [01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:09.000] So what? [01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:14.000] Did you file it as a registered owner? [01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:15.000] Don't need to. [01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:17.000] They're mine. [01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:23.000] What is the, where would I file the birth certificate [01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:31.000] to show that I'm the registered owner of the birth certificate? [01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:38.000] I just didn't have a hand here. [01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:42.000] Okay, we'll pick this up on the other side. [01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:43.000] We can't spend too much time. [01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:47.000] This time we've got one more color, but my point here is, [01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:53.000] it's about being consistent and thorough in your thinking process. [01:43:53.000 --> 01:43:55.000] You have to connect all the dots. [01:43:55.000 --> 01:44:00.000] Randy Kellogg, we'll be right back. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000] Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics? [01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000] Sorry. [01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:08.000] Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve? [01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:09.000] What? [01:44:09.000 --> 01:44:13.000] What could be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity? [01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:16.000] Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, [01:44:16.000 --> 01:44:19.000] I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age. [01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:22.000] I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease [01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:25.000] is found in almost every home in America, the television. [01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:29.000] Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, [01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:30.000] but there is hope. [01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:32.000] The staff at Brave New Books have helped me [01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000] and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports-zombieism recover, [01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:39.000] and because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading [01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:43.000] and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested. [01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:46.000] So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, [01:44:46.000 --> 01:44:50.000] then you need to call 512-480-2503 [01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:55.000] or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com. [01:44:55.000 --> 01:44:57.000] Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment [01:44:57.000 --> 01:45:01.000] and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning. [01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:07.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, [01:45:07.000 --> 01:45:11.000] the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course [01:45:11.000 --> 01:45:15.000] that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step. [01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too. [01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:31.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney [01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:34.000] with 22 years of case-winning experience. [01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:39.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:43.000] about the principles and practices that control our American courts. [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:48.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, [01:45:48.000 --> 01:45:52.000] forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. [01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner [01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:01.000] or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:53.000] The people come down from the hill [01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:57.000] Okay, we are back. [01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:03.000] John, we're not being pedantic here, [01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:12.000] but in order to be able to understand something, [01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:16.000] we have to be very careful about how we organize our thinking. [01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:23.000] Speaking to Jeff on the break, [01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:26.000] he happened to have the book that I referenced. [01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:29.000] There's one book that I've probably read four or five times [01:47:29.000 --> 01:47:32.000] and almost never read a book twice. [01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:37.000] The book was called Nonsense, How to Detect It and How to Avoid It. [01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:41.000] I didn't like the name, so I avoided it a long time. [01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:44.000] Finally, I picked it up and read it, and I was astounded. [01:47:44.000 --> 01:47:47.000] It's the best book on the use and misuse of language [01:47:47.000 --> 01:47:49.000] I have ever come across. [01:47:49.000 --> 01:47:53.000] But in one section there, he listed a bunch of things that people do. [01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:58.000] People don't pay attention, misinterpret what they see, [01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:01.000] and then make horrible errors in judgment. [01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:03.000] He goes through a whole list of these things, [01:48:03.000 --> 01:48:07.000] and one of them really stuck out to me. [01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:16.000] People seldom operate from a consistent set of beliefs. [01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:19.000] I see a baby fall down in skin or shin, [01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:27.000] or a baby comes toddling through the room and steps on my ingrown toenail. [01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:30.000] Gee, Mindy, creakage that hurts. [01:48:30.000 --> 01:48:37.000] I have this response set that I use to deal with the baby just stepped on my toe. [01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:40.000] And then my mother-in-law comes stomping through the room [01:48:40.000 --> 01:48:44.000] and steps on my ingrown toenail. [01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:49.000] I act completely different. [01:48:49.000 --> 01:48:54.000] I see something happen in one context, I'm compassionate. [01:48:54.000 --> 01:48:59.000] In another context, I'm angry. [01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:09.000] To the degree that we're not precisely aware of the thought processes we're using, [01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:12.000] the context of the thought processes we're using, [01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:15.000] we really don't know what we're doing. [01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:20.000] And when we try to examine these really sophisticated issues, [01:49:20.000 --> 01:49:30.000] we need to understand context and always keep the context the same [01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:35.000] so that you're very consistent. [01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:37.000] I really haven't explained this a lot, [01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:41.000] so I'm not really good at taking this thing that's in my head out [01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:46.000] and stating it in a way that makes sense. [01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:51.000] But the best way I have is connecting dots. [01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:55.000] All the dots have to stick together. [01:49:55.000 --> 01:49:58.000] When you say something is a certain way, [01:49:58.000 --> 01:50:00.000] that we talk about on the show, [01:50:00.000 --> 01:50:04.000] never make a proactive statement of law out of your own mouth. [01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:10.000] Never make a statement, something is this way. [01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:12.000] You can make it that way, [01:50:12.000 --> 01:50:19.000] but in your mind you have to be able to say this statute says it's this way, [01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:25.000] like when I talk about a public official committing official oppression. [01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:31.000] I never say that the public official committed official oppression. [01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:37.000] I say the public official violated Article 39.03 Texas Penal Code [01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:41.000] in that he failed to perform a duty he was required to perform [01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:46.000] or exerted or purported to exert an authority he did not expressly have [01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:50.000] and in the process denied me the full free access to or enjoy middle right. [01:50:50.000 --> 01:50:56.000] I always say it that way, so it always sticks that way in my mind, [01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:00.000] so I never misuse it. [01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:03.000] When we're talking about legal matters, [01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:08.000] any time Jeff says so what, [01:51:08.000 --> 01:51:12.000] you have to be able to step back, pull the code out, [01:51:12.000 --> 01:51:17.000] and say here's the code, here's the case law that takes you there, [01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:19.000] or you can't go there. [01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:22.000] Does that make sense, John? [01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:25.000] Yeah, but I do know that. [01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:27.000] Yeah, I understand. [01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:30.000] It's a matter of middle discipline, [01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:36.000] and it keeps us from getting lost in all this complex material. [01:51:36.000 --> 01:51:38.000] And I struggle with it. [01:51:38.000 --> 01:51:40.000] I've been struggling with this for 25 years, [01:51:40.000 --> 01:51:43.000] and I still struggle with it [01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:47.000] because it's really subtle how it creeps up on us, [01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:52.000] and we lose that referential index. [01:51:52.000 --> 01:51:55.000] Everything in the mind is about referential index. [01:51:55.000 --> 01:52:05.000] When I was talking earlier about the electronic lawyer, [01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:12.000] everything about that electronic lawyer is about referential index. [01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:19.000] I use a very specific technique to attach one issue to the next, [01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:22.000] to the next, to the next, to the next, [01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:26.000] in a very tightly connected mind. [01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:30.000] It's not always straight, it moves around. [01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:35.000] But I can go back to this thought process, [01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:38.000] and every piece is exactly connected together. [01:52:38.000 --> 01:52:41.000] Never lose it. [01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:47.000] The only way we, okay, before it's meant to go there, [01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:55.000] is I was at a meeting of big data database programmers, [01:52:55.000 --> 01:52:59.000] and they were complaining that the artificial intelligence [01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:02.000] had not lived up to its hype. [01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:08.000] And I said to them, I said, I have a problem with that [01:53:08.000 --> 01:53:12.000] because you guys are looking at artificial intelligence [01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:17.000] from a very high level of abstraction, [01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:23.000] and you haven't defined the underlying unstated presuppositions [01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:25.000] from which you're working. [01:53:25.000 --> 01:53:30.000] I have this tool, I call it an electronic lawyer, [01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:35.000] and it can kick any living lawyer's behind, [01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:38.000] and it has no intelligence whatsoever. [01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:41.000] One guy in there said, hey man, I'm a lawyer, [01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:43.000] would I take offense to that? [01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:45.000] I said, no, no, you don't understand. [01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:50.000] All it does is connect dots together. [01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:53.000] It doesn't think, it doesn't figure anything out, [01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:56.000] it just connects the dots together. [01:53:56.000 --> 01:54:05.000] What I'm unable to find is where connecting the dots together stops [01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:10.000] and where this thing we call intelligence begins. [01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:13.000] So you guys are complaining that artificial intelligence [01:54:13.000 --> 01:54:15.000] hasn't lived up to its hype. [01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:21.000] Well, can anybody here define generic intelligence? [01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:24.000] I don't know what it is. [01:54:24.000 --> 01:54:27.000] And so far, for the most part, I don't need it. [01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:32.000] All I need to do is be able to connect all the dots together. [01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:35.000] And I know you got people here who think I'm really smart. [01:54:35.000 --> 01:54:37.000] No, no, no, that's not it. [01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:39.000] I've been connecting dots for a long time [01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:44.000] and real careful about connecting all these dots together. [01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:48.000] So I don't wind up losing my place very often. [01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:51.000] I still do, but when I lose my place, [01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:54.000] that tells me some dots are missing. [01:54:54.000 --> 01:54:59.000] So I back up to what I know and I go look for law [01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:02.000] and case law that leads me to this other place. [01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:05.000] Does that make sense, John? [01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:06.000] Yes. [01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:08.000] Does this make sense? [01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:12.000] These remmings are tax issue only? [01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:13.000] No. [01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:14.000] Only tax. [01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:18.000] What does tax issue mean? [01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:20.000] The tax is not paid. [01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:23.000] It was originally put up to be a tax. [01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:24.000] Okay. [01:55:24.000 --> 01:55:25.000] No. [01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:31.000] A remmick is under 386, the IRS code. [01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:36.000] And it is a tax. [01:55:36.000 --> 01:55:41.000] It's set up as a tax avoidance entity. [01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:42.000] Right. [01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:44.000] Yes. [01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:46.000] It is strictly related to tax. [01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:49.000] It's set up for tax purposes. [01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:50.000] Okay. [01:55:50.000 --> 01:55:51.000] That part I understand. [01:55:51.000 --> 01:55:55.000] It was never transferred. [01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:56.000] Okay. [01:55:56.000 --> 01:55:58.000] Here's another issue. [01:55:58.000 --> 01:56:00.000] You're using pronouns. [01:56:00.000 --> 01:56:03.000] It was never transferred. [01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:08.000] Instead of saying, if you say it, [01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:13.000] I have to stop mental flow and go look at that pronoun and say, [01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:18.000] okay, what is the referential index for it? [01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:24.000] It generally refers to something that was previously mentioned. [01:56:24.000 --> 01:56:25.000] Wait. [01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:27.000] Say that again. [01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:33.000] This is the IRS number of that particular 195-4596514. [01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:38.000] That's the IRS number of this remmick that I was in. [01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:46.000] There's 11,140 remmicks in that one group. [01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:49.000] Was that remmick filed with the IRS? [01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:50.000] Okay. [01:56:50.000 --> 01:57:00.000] That was a pool of notes that was filed with the IRS [01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:03.000] as a real estate mortgage investment condor. [01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:04.000] Okay. [01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:07.000] But they were never filed with the Securities Exchange Commission, [01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:11.000] which makes them the deed of trust and the promise... [01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:12.000] Wait a minute. [01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:13.000] Wait a minute. [01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:15.000] You used they. [01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:19.000] What did they refer to? [01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:23.000] The correct name of it was CWABS, [01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:30.000] Asset Back Securities 205-3, that was the name of it, of the pool. [01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:31.000] Okay. [01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:33.000] The pool itself. [01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:34.000] See, here's the problem. [01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:36.000] You're calling the pool, that's a singular, [01:57:36.000 --> 01:57:40.000] and you're using a plural noun, a plural pronoun. [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:41.000] What? [01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:43.000] PSA. [01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:44.000] Okay. [01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:51.000] The PSA was never filed with the IRS. [01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:56.000] It was set up originally, but they were never transferred. [01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:03.000] 11,140 individual mortgages. [01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:08.000] Anyway, I'll get ahold of you next week and maybe we can get together. [01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:09.000] Okay. [01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:11.000] Thank you, and we are out of time. [01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:14.000] This is Randy Kelton, Wheel of Love Radio. [01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:16.000] We're here with Jeff Sedgwick. [01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:18.000] Thank you for your time, Jeff. [01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:21.000] We'll be back next. [01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:23.000] Go ahead, Jeff. [01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:24.000] Oh, you're welcome. [01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:25.000] Okay. [01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:26.000] Okay. [01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:31.000] We'll be back next Thursday on our two-hour show with Debbie Stevens. [01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:32.000] And then Friday. [01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:40.000] Make sure you tune in Monday for Eddie Craig on his traffic sense show. [01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:50.000] Thank you all for listening, and good night. [01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:55.000] Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible [01:58:55.000 --> 01:58:58.000] called the New Testament Recovery Version. [01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:02.000] The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain [01:59:02.000 --> 01:59:06.000] what the Bible says verse by verse, helping you to know God [01:59:06.000 --> 01:59:08.000] and to know the meaning of life. [01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000] Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. [01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000] Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:26.000] This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, [01:59:26.000 --> 01:59:30.000] plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible. [01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000] This is truly a Bible you can understand. [01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:36.000] To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, [01:59:36.000 --> 01:59:41.000] call us toll free at 888-551-0102. [01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:52.000] That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org. [01:59:52.000 --> 01:59:53.000] Looking for some truth? [01:59:53.000 --> 01:59:55.000] You found it. [01:59:55.000 --> 02:00:07.000] Go to BiblesGhostRadioNetwork.com.