[00:00.000 --> 00:07.840]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the daily
[00:07.840 --> 00:10.040]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:10.040 --> 00:23.480]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:23.480 --> 00:30.040]  Investments for the 20th of August, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,154.76 an ounce, silver
[00:30.040 --> 00:35.920]  at $15.54 an ounce, Texas crude at $40.80 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting
[00:35.920 --> 00:44.040]  in about $235 U.S. currency.
[00:44.040 --> 00:49.560]  Today in history, Sunday, August 20, 1922, the world's first Women's Olympic Games are
[00:49.560 --> 00:53.640]  held in track and field competitions in Paris, France.
[00:53.640 --> 00:57.360]  The tournament was held on a single day and was in response to the International Olympics
[00:57.360 --> 01:02.520]  Committee refusal to include women's events in the 1924 Olympic Games.
[01:02.520 --> 01:06.080]  The Games were attended by an audience of roughly 20,000 spectators.
[01:06.080 --> 01:12.040]  18 world records were set.
[01:12.040 --> 01:16.720]  In recent news, Jared Fogel's wife, Katie, has officially filed for divorce from their
[01:16.720 --> 01:22.920]  five-year marriage yesterday as the ex-spokesman for Subway agreed to plead guilty to charges
[01:22.920 --> 01:27.440]  of sexual intercourse with at least two minors and possession of child pornography.
[01:27.440 --> 01:32.720]  He has agreed to pay out $1.4 million in total to the victims in restitution for counseling,
[01:32.720 --> 01:36.120]  support, treatment, or other assistance related to their abuse.
[01:36.120 --> 01:40.240]  He apparently wasn't doing this alone, as Russell Taylor, who was the executive director
[01:40.240 --> 01:44.840]  of Fogel's Childhood Obesity Charity, was also involved in these obscenities.
[01:44.840 --> 01:52.480]  They are both expected to do time.
[01:52.480 --> 01:56.460]  Federal scientists announced today that this last July was the all-time warmest month ever
[01:56.460 --> 02:01.360]  recorded since the 1880s, when modern temperature record-keeping first began.
[02:01.360 --> 02:04.580]  Scientists are predicting that as a result of this heat wave, the Pacific Ocean will
[02:04.580 --> 02:09.280]  continue to warm up, causing the ocean to release even more heat into the atmosphere,
[02:09.280 --> 02:12.480]  almost certainly making 2015 the hottest year ever recorded.
[02:12.480 --> 02:16.680]  The debate is expected to continue between whether these increases in temperatures are
[02:16.680 --> 02:26.600]  a result of man-made climate change or simply part of Earth's climate cycles.
[02:26.600 --> 02:31.000]  Women will be allowed to vote and run for office in Saudi Arabia's municipal elections
[02:31.000 --> 02:32.640]  for the first time ever.
[02:32.640 --> 02:38.240]  The Arab woman's suffrage comes four years after the late Saudi king, Abdullah bin Abdulaziz
[02:38.240 --> 02:42.300]  al-Assad, approved the changes back in 2011.
[02:42.300 --> 02:46.680]  Only 70 women are looking to run as candidates, while another 80 have registered as campaign
[02:46.680 --> 02:47.680]  managers.
[02:47.680 --> 02:51.280]  Many are still questioning whether this really brings any substantial change to a country
[02:51.280 --> 02:54.360]  where women's activities and rights are heavily restricted.
[02:54.360 --> 03:23.320]  This is your Lowdown for August 20th, 2013.
[03:23.320 --> 03:38.300]  Good evening everyone.
[03:53.320 --> 04:01.320]  A mighty street for all the people to see
[04:01.320 --> 04:04.820]  And just as there's one thing you should always find
[04:04.820 --> 04:06.820]  You've got to settle up your boys
[04:06.820 --> 04:08.820]  You've got to draw a hard line
[04:08.820 --> 04:10.820]  When the guns will settle
[04:10.820 --> 04:12.820]  We'll sing a victory tune
[04:12.820 --> 04:17.320]  And we'll all be back at the hopeful salute
[04:17.320 --> 04:21.820]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing
[04:21.820 --> 04:26.820]  Let's get for my men, before my horses
[04:32.820 --> 04:35.820]  We got too many gangsters doing
[04:35.820 --> 04:41.820]  Alright folks, good evening, it is August 24th, 2014
[04:41.820 --> 04:47.820]  And we are moving right along as usual, all things considered
[04:47.820 --> 04:54.820]  Now, I would like to go into an issue here dealing with the justice and municipal courts
[04:54.820 --> 04:59.820]  And their attempt to gain jurisdiction versus using just a criminal complaint
[04:59.820 --> 05:02.820]  Now, you may have heard me talk about this before
[05:02.820 --> 05:08.820]  But I want to try to cover this in enough detail that it will actually make sense
[05:08.820 --> 05:12.820]  Now, before I get into this, I just want to forewarn y'all
[05:12.820 --> 05:15.820]  This may take me a few segments to get it all out there
[05:15.820 --> 05:17.820]  So that you know what's going on with it
[05:17.820 --> 05:21.820]  So before I get started on that, I do have one caller on the board from up in New York
[05:21.820 --> 05:25.820]  And rather than making him hold for all the segments, I'm going to go ahead and take him
[05:25.820 --> 05:27.820]  But everybody else, please understand
[05:27.820 --> 05:30.820]  After I get done with this caller, I'm going to be going into this information
[05:30.820 --> 05:33.820]  I'll be more than happy to take calls afterward
[05:33.820 --> 05:37.820]  But for the moment, I want to get this out there for everyone
[05:37.820 --> 05:42.820]  Because this is a very important area that's being ignored by the courts
[05:42.820 --> 05:44.820]  And we need to be pounding on it
[05:44.820 --> 05:48.820]  That being said, let me take this call from Nathan in New York
[05:48.820 --> 05:52.820]  Nathan, what can I do for you?
[05:52.820 --> 05:54.820]  Sir, I would...
[05:54.820 --> 05:55.820]  Yes, Nathan, go ahead
[05:55.820 --> 05:58.820]  I would...
[05:58.820 --> 06:02.820]  I would be happy to listen for a while, that's fine
[06:02.820 --> 06:05.820]  I thought Randy was going to be on tonight
[06:05.820 --> 06:09.820]  Nope, Randy is on Thursdays and Fridays
[06:09.820 --> 06:10.820]  Okay
[06:10.820 --> 06:17.820]  So if your issue has anything to do with mortgages or anything like that, I am not the guy to talk to
[06:17.820 --> 06:19.820]  Okay
[06:19.820 --> 06:23.820]  Alright, yeah, well I'll be happy to listen to what you have to say
[06:23.820 --> 06:28.820]  Well, do you want to do that on hold or do you want to do that over the internet?
[06:28.820 --> 06:32.820]  I'll do that on hold if you don't mind
[06:32.820 --> 06:37.820]  Okay, well do you have an actual question for this show?
[06:37.820 --> 06:39.820]  No, I do not
[06:39.820 --> 06:44.820]  Okay, then the only problem with you holding online is we don't have a listener line
[06:44.820 --> 06:47.820]  You're sitting in one of the only spots available for call-ins
[06:47.820 --> 06:52.820]  So if you actually want to listen, please do that online
[06:52.820 --> 06:53.820]  Okay
[06:53.820 --> 06:54.820]  Okay?
[06:54.820 --> 06:55.820]  Alrighty
[06:55.820 --> 06:56.820]  Alright, thanks Nathan
[06:56.820 --> 06:57.820]  Thank you
[06:57.820 --> 06:58.820]  Alright, bye bye
[06:58.820 --> 07:01.820]  Alright, here we go folks
[07:01.820 --> 07:05.820]  And of course, even after telling everybody heads up, I'm still getting people calling into the caller board
[07:05.820 --> 07:07.820]  Alright, let me try this again
[07:07.820 --> 07:16.820]  Now, right now in Texas, we have this problem with the higher courts constantly ruling that the lower courts,
[07:16.820 --> 07:25.820]  meaning Justice and Municipal and Class C fine-onlys, require only a complaint to invest that court with jurisdiction of the case
[07:25.820 --> 07:29.820]  There are several due process issues with that determination
[07:29.820 --> 07:40.820]  Not the least of which is the fact that a complaint is not required to meet all of the other requirements of a charging instrument
[07:40.820 --> 07:50.820]  For instance, an indictment or information by statutory decree are required to state all of the factual elements that are required to be proven at trial
[07:50.820 --> 07:54.820]  No such requirement exists for a complaint
[07:54.820 --> 08:00.820]  The second problem with the complaint is that a complaint is a hearsay instrument
[08:00.820 --> 08:09.820]  The person swearing out the complaint does not have to have competent first-hand knowledge of the facts being asserted in the complaint
[08:09.820 --> 08:15.820]  In fact, the language of the complaint, even if the person does have first-hand knowledge,
[08:15.820 --> 08:22.820]  is not sufficient to grant jurisdiction because it's not an actual sworn affidavit
[08:22.820 --> 08:31.820]  It contains qualifying language, which the courts themselves have ruled doesn't constitute a sworn statement
[08:31.820 --> 08:36.820]  That's one thing that somebody can say, yeah, I'm verifying somebody signed this
[08:36.820 --> 08:46.820]  But when the complaint itself is hearsay, and hearsay is inadmissible in a court except under very specific situations,
[08:46.820 --> 08:58.820]  how can a hearsay instrument of hearsay be the basis for a court's jurisdiction that is not part of those hearsay exceptions?
[08:58.820 --> 09:01.820]  That's the second problem
[09:01.820 --> 09:09.820]  The third problem is you're not necessarily being allowed to face the person making the allegations against you,
[09:09.820 --> 09:12.820]  which is whoever is the affiant on that complaint
[09:12.820 --> 09:23.820]  An affiant there has to be defined very loosely because, again, it's not actually sworn under penalty of perjury as to be true and correct
[09:23.820 --> 09:30.820]  See, the difference here is what they are calling a sworn complaint versus a sworn statement
[09:30.820 --> 09:35.820]  A criminal complaint is not a sworn statement
[09:35.820 --> 09:43.820]  because the statement can only be done by someone with competent first-hand knowledge of the facts being asserted
[09:43.820 --> 09:46.820]  A complaint does not have that requirement
[09:46.820 --> 09:52.820]  Therefore, a sworn statement as the instrument investing a court with jurisdiction,
[09:52.820 --> 10:01.820]  even if the indictment or information are quashed at the county or local level,
[10:01.820 --> 10:10.820]  the sworn statement would still remain because it only exists in relation to the information or indictment
[10:10.820 --> 10:13.820]  See, the sworn statement was there
[10:13.820 --> 10:19.820]  The information or indictment is based upon the facts asserted in the sworn statement
[10:19.820 --> 10:29.820]  Thus, the creation and submission of the information or indictment invests the court with jurisdiction from the original get-go
[10:29.820 --> 10:44.820]  But even if they're quashed later, the sworn statement will still stand up for the purpose of having the accused answer to the allegations made in it
[10:44.820 --> 10:59.820]  That is exactly why a sworn statement and a sworn complaint cannot be the same thing for the purpose of providing the court with jurisdiction of the action
[10:59.820 --> 11:01.820]  Can't be
[11:01.820 --> 11:14.820]  All right, there's no requirement that it has all of the necessary elements required to be proven, there is no requirement that it be made by a person with competent first-hand knowledge
[11:14.820 --> 11:23.820]  We also have the issue of them attempting to use the citation as a sworn complaint, and there's two very big problems with that, both of them statutory
[11:23.820 --> 11:31.820]  Well, three, if you also count the fact that it deprives you of the right of due process by failing to provide you sufficient notice of the allegation
[11:31.820 --> 11:40.820]  It cannot give you sufficient notice if all of the things the prosecutor has to prove aren't listed there for you to understand
[11:40.820 --> 11:44.820]  It's not sufficient notice
[11:44.820 --> 11:59.820]  Now, 27.14D of the Code of Criminal Procedure says that they can use the complaint or the citation as a complaint
[11:59.820 --> 12:23.820]  But, and this is a big but here, all right, in order to do so, there must be a signed waiver by both the prosecution and the accused that has already been filed with the court, waiving the need for an actual sworn complaint
[12:23.820 --> 12:38.820]  But this creates another jurisdictional quandary, and that is as if the courts themselves have set the minimum bar to jurisdiction in these courts is a valid sworn complaint
[12:38.820 --> 12:54.820]  And the citation does not comply with all of the requisites of a sworn complaint under 45.019 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for these types of cases
[12:54.820 --> 13:18.820]  Then the citation is insufficient to invoke the court's jurisdiction even if there is a waiver because it does not comport itself with the requirements of a complaint and the sufficiency of a complaint
[13:18.820 --> 13:30.820]  Now, you also have on top of this Article 5, Section 12B of the Texas Constitution which very clearly states that an indictment or information is what invokes the jurisdiction of the court, not a complaint
[13:30.820 --> 13:39.820]  Nowhere in the Texas Constitution is the legislature authorized to change what is considered a valid charging instrument
[13:39.820 --> 13:47.820]  In fact, nowhere is the sworn statement ever referred to as a charging instrument within the Constitution
[13:47.820 --> 13:57.820]  The only thing there in fact charging instrument doesn't exist, it simply states an indictment or information is necessary to invoke the jurisdiction
[13:57.820 --> 14:04.820]  But neither of those can exist until a sworn statement has been made
[14:04.820 --> 14:07.820]  You got it?
[14:07.820 --> 14:21.820]  But once that sworn statement is done and the indictment or information has been filed, the court's jurisdiction has been invoked, and then even if the indictment or information are found wanting, insufficient, or quashed
[14:21.820 --> 14:33.820]  The sworn statement will still maintain jurisdiction, but it was not sufficient alone to invoke it
[14:33.820 --> 14:41.820]  And again, the sworn statement is different than the actual complaint that they use
[14:41.820 --> 14:51.820]  It has to be because a sworn statement can only be done by someone with competent first-hand knowledge of the facts to which they are swearing
[14:51.820 --> 14:58.820]  And if you swear to certain facts, then you have to do so under penalty of perjury
[14:58.820 --> 15:08.820]  A complaint does not contain any language referencing a penalty of perjury because no one can be charged with perjury for making a complaint based upon what they believe may be the problem
[15:08.820 --> 15:22.820]  But you can get charged with perjury, in fact when you sign the sworn statements that the police agencies or that the prosecutors get you to sign before them, at the very bottom it says under penalty of perjury
[15:22.820 --> 15:34.820]  See, that's a sworn statement. When there is peril attached to swearing falsely, that is a sworn statement
[15:34.820 --> 15:38.820]  And a complaint simply doesn't have that
[15:38.820 --> 15:54.820]  Now, on top of all of this, of course, the hearsay issue comes even more clear because there's two things the prosecutor attempts to deny you the ability to do in court
[15:54.820 --> 16:11.820]  If the person testifying against you is not the affiant of the complaint, they get the court to rule that that person does not have to appear to testify because that person has no relevant factual knowledge of the allegations they made in the complaint
[16:11.820 --> 16:18.820]  And that's true, but they're still the one making it
[16:18.820 --> 16:32.820]  What they're attempting to do is to block your ability to prove that the only reason the person had come in contact with those facts was because they were employed by the same court that's presiding over this case
[16:32.820 --> 16:43.820]  And thus we have an agency problem when the affiant is someone that works in the court, like one of the clerks for instance
[16:43.820 --> 16:51.820]  All right, folks, we'll pick this up on the other side. Eric, I see you there. You hang on. This might take this break or the next one, so just hold on
[16:51.820 --> 17:17.820]  All right, folks, we'll be right back. Rule of Law Radio, y'all hang in there
[17:21.820 --> 17:31.820]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject
[17:31.820 --> 17:39.820]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others
[17:39.820 --> 17:47.820]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio
[17:47.820 --> 17:51.820]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us
[17:51.820 --> 17:58.820]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income
[17:58.820 --> 18:00.820]  Order now
[18:00.820 --> 18:05.820]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.820 --> 18:09.820]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method
[18:09.820 --> 18:14.820]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win, too
[18:14.820 --> 18:20.820]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[18:20.820 --> 18:24.820]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons
[18:24.820 --> 18:26.820]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[18:26.820 --> 18:28.820]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[18:28.820 --> 18:33.820]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[18:33.820 --> 18:38.820]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[18:38.820 --> 18:40.820]  Personal consultation is available as well
[18:40.820 --> 18:46.820]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[18:46.820 --> 18:49.820]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[18:49.820 --> 18:51.820]  That's ruleoflawradio.com
[18:51.820 --> 18:57.820]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[18:57.820 --> 19:00.820]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now
[19:00.820 --> 19:10.820]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:10.820 --> 19:38.820]  Music
[19:38.820 --> 19:45.820]  Alright, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[19:45.820 --> 19:51.820]  Alright, now to continue on here real quick with this situation where the clerk is the affiant on the complaint
[19:51.820 --> 19:57.820]  And you're being denied the ability to bring the clerk in to question them as to how they became knowledgeable of the facts
[19:57.820 --> 20:04.820]  And how the clerk, being an agent of the judge within the court, only has any knowledge of the facts of the case
[20:04.820 --> 20:11.820]  Due to their job as a clerk in that court acting as an agent for that judge
[20:11.820 --> 20:21.820]  They don't want that clerk being able to be called so that you can get the facts in the record that we have a due process issue with a clerk
[20:21.820 --> 20:29.820]  Because not only do we have the person swearing out the complaint against us, working for the same judge presiding over the case
[20:29.820 --> 20:36.820]  That person is also the custodian of the record in the same court where it's being heard
[20:36.820 --> 20:43.820]  And has direct access to any and all documents that are part of that record
[20:43.820 --> 20:48.820]  And that entire record is in that agent's care
[20:48.820 --> 21:01.820]  See the problem here? The person swearing out the facts against you also controls the information in the record used by the court hearing the case
[21:01.820 --> 21:04.820]  Ding ding ding, alright
[21:04.820 --> 21:14.820]  Then we get to the issue of the officer taking the stand, you asking pointed questions about the facts asserted in the complaint
[21:14.820 --> 21:24.820]  And the prosecutor attempting to block their ability to answer by objecting and saying that the witness is not required to have knowledge of those specific things
[21:24.820 --> 21:37.820]  Now understand that when you ask them to make legal conclusions or opinions or to recite stuff off the top of their head, that's what you're going to get
[21:37.820 --> 21:47.820]  But there is a way to force them to answer. If you lay the foundation properly and you get them to answer properly, then you can make them answer the rest of it
[21:47.820 --> 21:50.820]  And the prosecutor's not going to be able to save them
[21:50.820 --> 22:01.820]  And if he does, then they're tampering with a witness and preventing you from getting exculpatory evidence into the record, which you can raise as an appellate issue
[22:01.820 --> 22:16.820]  Okay? So, when they object to you asking questions, make sure your questions aren't generic, that they don't require an opinion or a conclusion of the actual law
[22:16.820 --> 22:21.820]  You simply ask the officer specific facts
[22:21.820 --> 22:34.820]  Now, after going through these statutes as many times as I have, I have come to the conclusion that if all I wanted to do was to beat any transportation offense on the merits, I can do that
[22:34.820 --> 22:42.820]  I can do that. Using the statute itself, I can prove that they can't prove any of what they're asserting
[22:42.820 --> 22:56.820]  I mean, let's look at how this works for them. They prevent you from discussing any of the definitions of the terminology so that the presumption of what they mean remains in the jury's mind as being what they commonly think it means
[22:56.820 --> 23:11.820]  Thus, unless you take the stand and bring up everything and they don't block you from doing it, you don't get to assert an opinion or a conclusion any more than the officer does even when you're testifying on your own behalf
[23:11.820 --> 23:23.820]  So, how do you do it? You do it through judicial notice and you do it through asking questions that allows you to raise that judicial notice
[23:23.820 --> 23:38.820]  What kind of questions are those? They're the kind where the witness, whoever it may be, makes a statement of facts that are inconsistent with the statute he's claiming to have knowledge of
[23:38.820 --> 23:47.820]  Then, the court has to take judicial notice when you're asserting that the officer has misstated the facts of the statute
[23:47.820 --> 23:58.820]  And so, you need the court to take judicial notice of the fact that the testimony being provided is not compliant with the requisites of the statute
[23:58.820 --> 24:14.820]  That's how you get it in. That's how you force them to allow you to get it in, by getting the officer to answer questions in a way that shows what he thinks he knows is not consistent with what the statute actually says or does
[24:14.820 --> 24:29.820]  That way, you're not forcing him to make a conclusion, nor are you having to make a conclusion. You're simply having them read the statute verbatim and then you're going to ask them specific questions over this
[24:29.820 --> 24:46.820]  For instance, yesterday in class, we have a case where a young man by the name of Connor is being charged in several issues dealing with what the officer has alleged on the citation to be a motor scooter slash moped
[24:46.820 --> 24:54.820]  While the allegation in the complaint is actually an allegation of operated a motor vehicle
[24:54.820 --> 25:08.820]  Well, when you look at the statute, you find out that motor vehicle is four definitions removed from motor scooter and moped
[25:08.820 --> 25:25.820]  In other words, when you read the definition of motor scooter, motor scooter defines itself or moped as a motor driven cycle. Well, there's a definition of motor driven cycle in 541 right under the definition of moped
[25:25.820 --> 25:39.820]  When you read motor driven cycle, it says it's defined as a motorcycle, which is also defined in 541. Then when you read motorcycle, motorcycle defines itself as a motor vehicle under 541
[25:39.820 --> 26:03.820]  So as you can see, motor vehicle is way down here through all these other definitions away from moped. And then there are very specific elements to the definition of moped itself, such as the vehicle must not be able to achieve a speed greater than 30 miles per hour in less than one mile
[26:03.820 --> 26:17.820]  It must be 50 cc or less. It must have no more than two brake horsepower. How would you use that against the officer when you get them on the stand in relation to the complaint?
[26:17.820 --> 26:39.820]  The complaint is saying motor vehicle. The allegation on the citation is that the type of conveyance was a moped. Why the disparity? You get them on that line of questioning so that you can get the connection between moped and motor vehicle by getting them to read through each of these definitions through judicial notice
[26:39.820 --> 26:53.820]  As long as the witness is testifying to it and it's relevant to how the charge is being made, they don't have a choice but to let you get it in. Anything else would give you an appealable error right away for deprivation of rights
[26:53.820 --> 27:04.820]  You're not being allowed to put on a vigorous defense. You're not being allowed to introduce exculpatory evidence. They're convicting you based upon a presumption and no facts if that's how they do it
[27:04.820 --> 27:19.820]  But you need to be able to make it clear in the record that's what they're doing. So you have to be clear in the record about what you're trying to prove and how you're going about doing it so that what they do is very apparent
[27:19.820 --> 27:42.820]  So by the time we get down through all these definitions, we've got the officer admitting that none of this actually applies to the conveyance because when it's all said and done, we get back at the moped and say, okay, officer, how far from where you initially made contact was it that you actually pulled me over and forced me to stop?
[27:42.820 --> 27:59.820]  Well, I encountered you at such-and-such intersection. Notice you didn't have a registration sticker on your motor vehicle and that's when you object a motor vehicle, of course, and I pulled you over within 100 to 200 yards of the intersection
[27:59.820 --> 28:21.820]  Okay, officer. So just so we're clear, you pulled me over approximately 300 to 600 feet from the intersection. Yes. Officer, that's how many feet is in 100 or 200 yards, right? Either 300 feet or 600 feet. Yes. Well, officer, how many feet are in a mile?
[28:21.820 --> 28:43.820]  Objection, relevance. Judge, the relevance is the statute giving the definition of moped, which I asked the court to take judicial notice of. It says very clearly in the statute in order to be defined as a moped that it must be able to achieve a speed of not more than 30 miles per hour in a mile or less than a mile
[28:43.820 --> 28:57.820]  I need to know if this officer ever paced it. If he didn't follow up for a mile, he doesn't know if it can get up higher than 30 miles per hour or not within that mile.
[28:57.820 --> 29:15.820]  Okay, overruled. All right, officer. How many feet in a mile? 5,280. If he even knows that. Okay, officer. Well, if there's 5,280 feet in a mile and you only paced me from three to 600, it's obvious you didn't go the full mile. Isn't that right?
[29:15.820 --> 29:29.820]  That would be correct. So you don't actually know if this conveyance is actually capable of getting over 30 miles per hour within a mile, are you? No.
[29:29.820 --> 29:42.820]  All right, officer. It says that you have to measure the brake power of this as to be less than two brake horsepower. What is the procedure for measuring brake horsepower? We'll get back to that in just a second.
[29:42.820 --> 29:56.820]  All right, folks. If you want to go ahead and start getting in line to call in numbers 512-646-1984. But when we get back and I finish this up, I do have a few moments with a special guest tonight who will be on, and I'll let you know who that is when we get that far.
[29:56.820 --> 29:59.820]  We'll be right back until y'all hang on.
[29:59.820 --> 30:16.820]  Is too much Internet driving Americans crazy? New research says the Web can make us lonely and depressed and even psychotic. I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll talk about the Internet's impact on our state of mind in a moment.
[30:16.820 --> 30:32.820]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.820 --> 30:45.820]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to. This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[30:45.820 --> 31:04.820]  It's no secret many Americans spend more time tweeting, texting, and emailing than they do sleeping. But can too much time online make us plum crazy? Proof is piling up that the Internet may be making us lonelier, more depressed, prone to obsessive compulsive disorders, and in extreme cases, even psychotic.
[31:04.820 --> 31:23.820]  Researchers are documenting actual changes in the brain caused by even moderate Web exposure. They're finding that digitized minds are constantly scanning for a fix, just like drug addicts, with every ping delivering a squirt of Dilbamine, that mini reward system for opening that message. Maybe it's time we stopped answering the call.
[31:23.820 --> 31:30.820]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:30.820 --> 31:37.820]  What are you thinking? Micro plant powder with iodine and probiotics for a total body detox for around $10 a month.
[31:37.820 --> 31:47.820]  Infusa.org has 12 formulations of micro plant powder for absorbing and removing toxins from your kidneys, liver, blood, lungs, stomach, and colon, and feel better than ever.
[31:47.820 --> 31:57.820]  It alkalizes, oxygenates, kills parasites, does the job of 10 products that save you space, time, and money. Call 888-910-4367.
[31:57.820 --> 32:01.820]  Infusa.org.
[32:27.820 --> 32:35.820]  This session with Rule of Law Radio has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.820 --> 32:50.820]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today. By ordering now you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie, video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:50.820 --> 33:01.820]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com. Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:01.820 --> 33:14.820]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:14.820 --> 33:28.820]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I gonna solve them to the head government them, prosecute them. Okay.
[33:28.820 --> 33:48.820]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:48.820 --> 34:05.820]  All right. Now, finish this up here real quick. We get the officer on the stand, we get him going through this, we get him saying, okay, what is the proper procedure for measuring brake horsepower?
[34:05.820 --> 34:19.820]  And when he has to testify that he doesn't know, well, officer, at what point did you manage to measure the brake horsepower of the engine? Well, I didn't. Okay.
[34:19.820 --> 34:36.820]  Well, let's see. You didn't go over a mile to determine whether it could reach a particular speed. You didn't measure the brake horsepower. At what point did you disassemble the engine and take a measurement of the piston cavity and the piston head to determine that it was 50 cc's or less?
[34:36.820 --> 34:51.820]  Well, I didn't. It was printed on a metal plate there on the engine. Well, officer, can you please show us what evidence you brought with you that shows that this engine has not in any way been modified from its factory size of 50 cc's?
[34:51.820 --> 35:06.820]  Presumably, if that's what it ever was, that's marked on this plate. In other words, everything they're doing is based upon a set of presumptions, not evidence and fact.
[35:06.820 --> 35:14.820]  They're presuming all of this, but they haven't collected any actual evidence to prove any of it.
[35:14.820 --> 35:28.820]  Well, officer, you said it was a motor vehicle. Could you please tell me, at any point during your alleged investigation, did you in any manner or any way obtain a bill of lading?
[35:28.820 --> 35:36.820]  Well, no. Well, officer, did you in any way during your alleged investigation obtain a passenger manifest?
[35:36.820 --> 35:50.820]  Well, no. Well, officer, at any time during this alleged investigation, did you ever obtain a commercial logbook that showed I was on any kind of clock?
[35:50.820 --> 36:00.820]  No. Okay, well, let's try one more then. Officer, at any point did I ever confess to you that I was engaging in any form of transportation?
[36:00.820 --> 36:03.820]  No.
[36:03.820 --> 36:16.820]  Then can you please explain how you came to the legal conclusion that I was in any way, shape or form operating a motor vehicle for the purpose of transportation?
[36:16.820 --> 36:31.820]  Well, I never said you were using it for transportation, but officer, this allegation and everything associated with it, including the things you have to prove, comes from the transportation code.
[36:31.820 --> 36:39.820]  In other words, the legislature said we're going to regulate transportation and this is the code we're going to use to do that.
[36:39.820 --> 36:52.820]  So, at what point did you obtain any evidence that the accused was engaged in transportation and thus was operating a motor vehicle for that purpose?
[36:52.820 --> 36:55.820]  Well, I didn't.
[36:55.820 --> 37:09.820]  Okay, so like everything else so far, you're operating entirely on presumptions, not facts or evidence, and your own legal conclusions despite a lack of facts and evidence. Is that correct?
[37:09.820 --> 37:12.820]  Thank you. That'll be all.
[37:12.820 --> 37:24.820]  And then when they get done and say that the prosecution rests, it's like, well, excuse me, the defense moves for a directed verdict in favor of the defense, the states fail to prove the necessary elements of the charges.
[37:24.820 --> 37:27.820]  Of course, they're not going to do it, but guess what?
[37:27.820 --> 37:39.820]  Appealable error because they are not taking the facts and the law and making a determination based upon the unification of both.
[37:39.820 --> 37:59.820]  They're being capricious and arbitrary outside of the law, or in this case, the statute, in this case, the code, in this case, the code that was illegally unconstitutionally enacted in 1995, which is another defense I'll get into in greater detail at another time, which I did in fact yesterday in this class.
[37:59.820 --> 38:10.820]  But in any case, while we're covering that, I would like to bring my guest on here for a short bit. He's only on for a little bit, so don't get your hopes up too high that he'll have a whole lot of time to stay and chat.
[38:10.820 --> 38:14.820]  But my guest tonight, Mr. Randy Kelton. Randy, are you there?
[38:14.820 --> 38:16.820]  Howdy, howdy. I am here.
[38:16.820 --> 38:19.820]  All righty. What do you got for us?
[38:19.820 --> 38:41.820]  Well, we were talking earlier about this issue of primarily, I wanted to talk about a specific claim that I had come up with, and I wanted you to kind of expand on it.
[38:41.820 --> 38:56.820]  I had a, someone who worked for me got a ticket, and when they got the ticket, they were released on their own recognizance after signing the citation.
[38:56.820 --> 39:15.820]  Now, as I read the transportation code, police officers authorized to release someone on their own recognizance if they sign the citation, which will contain a promise to appear before our magistrate.
[39:15.820 --> 39:29.820]  Well, she signed the citation, as I understand the traffic. I used to be able to quote the transportation code that Syde said. But what's the code now? It's not, I keep remembering Burns.
[39:29.820 --> 39:39.820]  Eddie, what is the code that authorizes the officer to release a person if they sign the citation?
[39:39.820 --> 39:43.820]  543.009.
[39:43.820 --> 39:57.820]  Okay. What that statute says is they must sign this, the citation as an agreement to appear before a magistrate.
[39:57.820 --> 40:07.820]  So she signed it, and it had to be before a magistrate because that's the only condition under which the officer is authorized to release the person.
[40:07.820 --> 40:13.820]  So she came to court, and she asked me to stand in as her counsel of choice.
[40:13.820 --> 40:23.820]  And the judge, to his credit, said, I will allow that for the purpose of this hearing, but if this comes to trial, he won't be able to speak. I said, fair enough.
[40:23.820 --> 40:31.820]  So she immediately asked the judge to hold an examining trial, and he said that we don't do that.
[40:31.820 --> 40:39.820]  And I said, Your Honor, are you sitting in the capacity of a magistrate? I said, I'm sorry. I said, Your Honor, are you a magistrate?
[40:39.820 --> 40:53.820]  He said, Mr. Kelton, all judges are magistrates. Yes, Your Honor, I understand that. But right now, which hat are you wearing? Your magistrate's hat or your judge's hat?
[40:53.820 --> 41:00.820]  And he refused to answer. But he also refused to hold an examining trial.
[41:00.820 --> 41:07.820]  So in reading the penal code, that raised an issue.
[41:07.820 --> 41:22.820]  The officer induced Tony to sign this citation and agree to appear before a magistrate.
[41:22.820 --> 41:31.820]  Subsequent to the signing of that citation, she appeared at the date and time specified on the citation for the purpose of appearing before a magistrate.
[41:31.820 --> 41:39.820]  But she was not able to appear before a magistrate. She was forced to appear before a judge.
[41:39.820 --> 41:49.820]  Now, the way I read the penal code, that is securing and executing a document by deception.
[41:49.820 --> 42:06.820]  The judge and the police officer conspired with one another to deceive Tony by getting her to agree before a magistrate and then forcing her to appear before a judge.
[42:06.820 --> 42:09.820]  Eddie, do you find a hole in that?
[42:09.820 --> 42:23.820]  In the logic, no. And I stand corrected for myself here. It's 543.006. 10 is the failure to appear part. I'm sorry, 9 is the failure to appear, but it's 006.
[42:23.820 --> 42:34.820]  Yeah, and what I brought up to Randy in relation to that specific allegation was this, that I asked him, had they already served her with a copy of a complaint?
[42:34.820 --> 42:44.820]  In fact, did they even show that they had a complaint? And he said, no, they were using the citation in lieu of a complaint, which introduced the two problems I discussed earlier.
[42:44.820 --> 43:04.820]  One, 27.14D authorizes the citation to be used in lieu of a complaint only if there is a signed waiver that is signed by both the accused and the prosecutor that has been filed with the court.
[43:04.820 --> 43:13.820]  They have to both agree on it. They have to both sign the waiver and that has to be filed with the court before the citation can be used as a complaint.
[43:13.820 --> 43:24.820]  However, the problem that creates is the citation is not compliant with the requisites of a complaint under 5 or under 45.019 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[43:24.820 --> 43:32.820]  There are four requisites of a complaint a citation does not meet at all.
[43:32.820 --> 43:47.820]  Okay, now that sets up a jurisdictional problem for the court, which I'll get to when we get back after this break, so y'all hang in there. Randy, if you'll hang on for just a minute, let us discuss that, and then if you need to go, we can do with that afterwards, okay?
[43:47.820 --> 43:48.820]  Okay.
[43:48.820 --> 43:59.820]  All right, folks, y'all hang in there. This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back, so y'all hold on.
[43:59.820 --> 44:14.820]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with JurisDictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:14.820 --> 44:26.820]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:26.820 --> 44:42.820]  JurisDictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience. Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.820 --> 45:00.820]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.820 --> 45:14.820]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 9204 Guadalupe Street, Suite D here in Austin, Texas. I'm Brave New Books and J.K.
[45:14.820 --> 45:22.820]  to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes. Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:22.820 --> 45:37.820]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold. Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:37.820 --> 45:52.820]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com. Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products, naturespureorganics.com.
[46:07.820 --> 46:24.820]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. This is Eddie Craig with my host, Randy Kelton.
[46:24.820 --> 46:39.820]  All right. Now, as I was saying about the jurisdictional issue that now exists because of the lack of complaint, since the courts have set the minimum bar to jurisdiction in the justice and municipal courts to be the filing of a sworn complaint,
[46:39.820 --> 46:59.820]  27.14D has a jurisdictional violation associated with using the citation in lieu of a complaint because the citation does not meet the statutory requisites of a complaint. It is not sworn in any way, shape, or form as is required on a complaint.
[46:59.820 --> 47:11.820]  There is no assertion of I have reason to believe and do believe. None of the required language for four of the things required of a complaint are on a citation.
[47:11.820 --> 47:28.820]  Nowhere is the citation authorized to invest the court with jurisdiction, but then again, neither is a complaint. But since the courts themselves have set the minimum bar to that of a complaint, the citation alone is insufficient to invoke it.
[47:28.820 --> 47:30.820]  What do you think of that argument?
[47:30.820 --> 47:39.820]  Okay. The court is going to say that they have been authorized to use the citation in lieu of a complaint.
[47:39.820 --> 48:03.820]  But based on your argument here, you can claim that, well, perhaps you could use the citation in lieu of a complaint if the citation met the requisites of a complaint. But since the municipality or whatever the county, whoever wrote the citation,
[48:03.820 --> 48:11.820]  failed to provide a citation that met the requirements of a complaint, then it is still insufficient.
[48:11.820 --> 48:31.820]  Correct. You can also throw one other thing into this. Not only is this insufficient for the requisites of a complaint, it's insufficient for the requisites of an actual citation as 99.9% of them do not meet the requirements of 708.105 of the transportation code either.
[48:31.820 --> 48:33.820]  708.15?
[48:33.820 --> 48:35.820]  105.
[48:35.820 --> 48:39.820]  105.
[48:39.820 --> 49:01.820]  I am going to have so much fun with this. My favorite thing to do is file a challenge subject matter jurisdiction. Because you get to come in with a challenge subject matter jurisdiction and push back on them. And for the most part, they tend not to realize that you understand.
[49:01.820 --> 49:14.820]  But we were helping people with foreclosure issues and trying to stop evictions. And I would come into the court at the last minute with a 30 or 40 page challenge subject matter jurisdiction.
[49:14.820 --> 49:25.820]  Judge Hayes in Mansfield got into his court and they started to hearing an objection, Your Honor, I'm here at arm's length to the court. I have a challenge subject matter jurisdiction before the court.
[49:25.820 --> 49:28.820]  Yes, Mr. Colonel, you just filed that 20 minutes ago.
[49:28.820 --> 49:32.820]  Yes, Your Honor, as a matter of fact, I did. It was 38 pages.
[49:32.820 --> 49:36.820]  Well, Mr. Colonel, I'm going to dismiss your challenge subject matter jurisdiction.
[49:36.820 --> 49:42.820]  So, you're going to dismiss that challenge subject matter jurisdiction without even reading it?
[49:42.820 --> 49:54.820]  Yes, Mr. Colonel, I am. We're done here. I closed my case. My folder got up and got to the bar and pointed at the best way that you come with me and left the courtroom.
[49:54.820 --> 50:01.820]  That's what you should do when they fail to act on a challenge subject matter jurisdiction.
[50:01.820 --> 50:11.820]  The hearing stops right there. The judge, as a rule, especially if he's a lawyer, he knows. But they think you don't know.
[50:11.820 --> 50:32.820]  A challenge subject matter jurisdiction, when you walk in the court, when the officer makes an accusation against you, the court accepts that as valid and sufficient to give the court subject matter jurisdiction on its face.
[50:32.820 --> 50:45.820]  However, if you raise an objection to the subject matter jurisdiction, and in order to do that, you need to bring some evidence to show that the original pleading was insufficient,
[50:45.820 --> 50:57.820]  then that original prima facie complaint is no longer sufficient and subject matter jurisdiction is lost.
[50:57.820 --> 51:07.820]  And the plaintiff doesn't have to prove jurisdiction. The court has to prove jurisdiction.
[51:07.820 --> 51:11.820]  Jurisdiction may not be presumed. It must be presumed.
[51:11.820 --> 51:13.820]  Wait, wait, wait. Let me interrupt. Let me interrupt.
[51:13.820 --> 51:14.820]  Go ahead.
[51:14.820 --> 51:24.820]  Court has no power to prove jurisdiction. The moving party must prove the court has jurisdiction. That would be the prosecutor.
[51:24.820 --> 51:38.820]  It is the court's duty to establish jurisdiction. Now, they can ask the moving party to provide evidence to overcome your objection.
[51:38.820 --> 51:48.820]  And that's what they must do. They may not presume. They cannot move ahead unless subject matter jurisdiction is proven.
[51:48.820 --> 52:00.820]  And the court has the duty. That was a fine distinction I was making. The court cannot just act on its own.
[52:00.820 --> 52:05.820]  Yeah. They cannot assume jurisdiction. It has to be invoked by one of the parties.
[52:05.820 --> 52:19.820]  Jurisdiction must be proven, and it's the court that must ensure that it's proven. So now the court has to go to the plaintiff, who's the only one who can prove it, and the plaintiff must bring evidence to prove jurisdiction.
[52:19.820 --> 52:26.820]  Well, for the most part, the judges just blow off jurisdiction if they think you don't know any better.
[52:26.820 --> 52:39.820]  And when they do that, the correct move, because you're there at arm's length to the court. And by that, you're not accepting the jurisdiction of the court.
[52:39.820 --> 52:50.820]  You're not stipulating to it. So you have no duty to answer to the court. That's why I walked out.
[52:50.820 --> 52:58.820]  And then the court will rule against you as a matter of course, and then you come back and file criminally against the judge.
[52:58.820 --> 53:16.820]  We start doing this, especially if you're in Tarrant County, because we have the door open in Tarrant County. In Tarrant County, we actually have a good prosecutor.
[53:16.820 --> 53:28.820]  You can file criminal complaints against public officials in Tarrant County yourself without any interference from the prosecuting attorney.
[53:28.820 --> 53:44.820]  I interviewed Sharon Wilson on my show before she got elected. And before the show, I did an interview with her and went through the code, so she realized I knew the code at least as well as she did.
[53:44.820 --> 53:53.820]  So I went to the Tarrant County District Attorney's Office with criminal charges against the Dallas County District Attorney.
[53:53.820 --> 54:02.820]  And this was a test. And the district attorney there said, well, Mr. Keltner, you should take those to Dallas County.
[54:02.820 --> 54:11.820]  I said, well, if you read the complaint, the complaint alleges that I took complaints against public officials to the Dallas County District Attorney.
[54:11.820 --> 54:21.820]  And he had been removed from the courtroom, from the building by people with loaded pistols on their hips to prevent me from filing complaints with the grand jury.
[54:21.820 --> 54:28.820]  That is the allegation, first degree felony aggravated assault, 2202-B2A, takes spin code.
[54:28.820 --> 54:46.820]  So it's inappropriate to ask me to go back to Dallas County and risk being removed from the courtroom, I mean, from the courthouse again by people with loaded pistols who has professed their willingness to use those loaded pistols against me.
[54:46.820 --> 55:02.820]  And besides, while a district judge who impanels a grand jury has a venue restriction, there's nothing in the code that extends that venue restriction to the grand jury.
[55:02.820 --> 55:12.820]  They looked at the code. They looked for case law. I asked them, find case law. If I'm wrong, find it. Show me. I can't find it.
[55:12.820 --> 55:21.820]  When I went down with criminal complaints against the Dallas County District Attorney, the Tarrant County District Attorney stood aside.
[55:21.820 --> 55:32.820]  I got a letter from the grand jury saying we examined into your accusations and find no Tarrant County offenses subject to indictment.
[55:32.820 --> 55:52.820]  Paragraph before that, he cited 20.09 that says a grand jury shall investigate into all offenses subject to indictment that come by way of the knowledge of any grand jury member by way of the prosecuting attorney or any credible person.
[55:52.820 --> 56:03.820]  What part of all offenses subject to indictment did the foreman not understand?
[56:03.820 --> 56:14.820]  So I went back and filed criminal charges against the foreman of the grand jury for shielding from prosecution under 3805 Penal Code.
[56:14.820 --> 56:30.820]  Now we'll see how that works out. But we're getting the door pried open to the grand jury. So when you go into the challenge subject matter jurisdiction and the judge pulls his standard shenanigan and refuses to rule on it or just rules against it,
[56:30.820 --> 56:35.820]  you walk out of the courtroom, go straight to the grand jury and file criminal charges against the judge.
[56:35.820 --> 56:54.820]  So you want to play hardball, bubba? We'll introduce you to the deep end of the pool. And their problem is you can not only go to the Travis County grand jury, you can go to any of the 254 grand juries in the state of Texas.
[56:54.820 --> 57:06.820]  And not only can you go to them, you can keep going to them until the statute of limitations on the accusation runs.
[57:06.820 --> 57:13.820]  We start doing that. We'll change everything. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[57:13.820 --> 57:15.820]  As usual.
[57:15.820 --> 57:18.820]  As usual.
[57:18.820 --> 57:28.820]  But what I want to do now, the one that just came up recently was this, securing and executing a document by deception.
[57:28.820 --> 57:36.820]  They have you sign this for one purpose and then coerce you into another purpose.
[57:36.820 --> 57:51.820]  You sign a degree to appear before a magistrate and they force you to appear before a judge. I call that a conspiracy between the judge and the police officer to secure and execute a document by deception.
[57:51.820 --> 57:53.820]  That's a valid statement.
[57:53.820 --> 57:55.820]  Yeah, found reasonable.
[57:55.820 --> 58:05.820]  That's my story I'm sticking to it. I'm hoping that maybe you'll research that out for me to make sure I haven't missed it.
[58:05.820 --> 58:10.820]  I'll provide that motion to you on challenging the jurisdiction of the court for the charging instrument.
[58:10.820 --> 58:15.820]  When I get done with the show, I'll make sure all this stuff is up to date in it.
[58:15.820 --> 58:23.820]  And challenge subject matter jurisdiction is absolutely my favorite thing to do. It is so much fun.
[58:23.820 --> 58:29.820]  All right, Randy. Well, I appreciate you being on. All right, folks, we're taking a break. So y'all hang in there and we'll be right back.
[58:29.820 --> 58:31.820]  Randy, you got any more for us?
[58:31.820 --> 58:32.820]  No, I'm good.
[58:32.820 --> 58:49.820]  All right. Well, I'll see you next time around then. All right, folks, we'll be right back after the break. So y'all hang on.
[58:49.820 --> 58:57.820]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.820 --> 59:05.820]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[59:05.820 --> 59:17.820]  Enter the recovery version. First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.820 --> 59:26.820]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:26.820 --> 59:32.820]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:32.820 --> 59:46.820]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:46.820 --> 59:49.820]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:49.820 --> 59:59.820]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[59:59.820 --> 01:00:22.820]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly bulletins for the commodity market. Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:22.820 --> 01:00:43.820]  Markets for the 20th of August, 2015 opened up with gold at $1,154.76 an ounce, silver $15.54 an ounce, Texas crude $40.80 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about $235 U.S. currency.
[01:00:43.820 --> 01:00:53.820]  Today in history, Sunday, August 20, 1922, the world's first Women's Olympic Games are held in track and field competitions in Paris, France.
[01:00:53.820 --> 01:01:02.820]  The tournament was held on a single day and was in response to the International Olympics Committee refusal to include women's events in the 1924 Olympic Games.
[01:01:02.820 --> 01:01:11.820]  The games were attended by an audience of roughly 20,000 spectators. 18 world records were set.
[01:01:11.820 --> 01:01:26.820]  In recent news, Jared Fogel's wife, Katie, has officially filed for divorce from their five-year marriage yesterday as the ex-spokesman for Subway agreed to plead guilty to charges of sexual intercourse with at least two minors and possession of child pornography.
[01:01:26.820 --> 01:01:35.820]  He has agreed to pay out $1.4 million in total to the victims in restitution for counseling, support, treatment, or other assistance related to their abuse.
[01:01:35.820 --> 01:01:51.820]  He apparently wasn't doing this alone, as Russell Taylor, who was the executive director of Fogel's Childhood Obesity Charity, was also involved in these obscenities. They are both expected in due time.
[01:01:51.820 --> 01:02:00.820]  Federal scientists announced today that this last July was the all-time warmest month ever recorded since the 1880s when modern temperature record keeping first began.
[01:02:00.820 --> 01:02:12.820]  Scientists are predicting that as a result of this heat wave, the Pacific Ocean will continue to warm up, causing the ocean to release even more heat into the atmosphere, almost certainly making 2015 the hottest year ever recorded.
[01:02:12.820 --> 01:02:26.820]  The debate is expected to continue between whether these increases in temperatures are a result of man-made climate change or simply part of Earth's climate cycles.
[01:02:26.820 --> 01:02:32.820]  Women will be allowed to vote and run for office in Saudi Arabia's municipal elections for the first time ever.
[01:02:32.820 --> 01:02:41.820]  The Arab woman's suffrage comes four years after the late Saudi king Abdullah bin Abdulaziz al-Assad approved the changes back in 2011.
[01:02:41.820 --> 01:02:47.820]  Apparently, 70 women are looking to run as candidates, while another 80 have registered as campaign managers.
[01:02:47.820 --> 01:02:54.820]  Many are still questioning whether this really brings any substantial change to a country where women's activities and rights are heavily restricted.
[01:02:54.820 --> 01:02:59.820]  This is your lowdown for August 20, 2013.
[01:03:24.820 --> 01:03:34.820]  I won't pay for the war with my body Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money
[01:03:34.820 --> 01:03:41.820]  I won't pay for the fun with my body Their plans wicked and their logic shoddy
[01:03:41.820 --> 01:03:47.820]  Ain't gonna pay for the oil with my body I won't pay for the boys with my money
[01:03:47.820 --> 01:03:55.820]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:03:55.820 --> 01:04:01.820]  And before we start taking calls, turns out Randy did have one more thing he'd like to let us know about. Randy?
[01:04:01.820 --> 01:04:06.820]  Yes, I did. It's Eddie's seminar.
[01:04:06.820 --> 01:04:12.820]  I do a lot of research in legal reform, but I don't do traffic.
[01:04:12.820 --> 01:04:20.820]  When I do traffic, I go to Eddie. And Eddie's materials have been absolutely incredible.
[01:04:20.820 --> 01:04:26.820]  The last ticket I got, they called my name, and the judge said, is the prosecution ready?
[01:04:26.820 --> 01:04:33.820]  And the prosecutor said, no, Your Honor, we are not ready. And the judge said, case dismissed. I object, I object.
[01:04:33.820 --> 01:04:36.820]  And Mr. Colton, you can't object, and he dismissed any case.
[01:04:36.820 --> 01:04:42.820]  Yeah, I can, Judge. We were just about to get to the fun part. Get out of my courtroom.
[01:04:42.820 --> 01:04:48.820]  And I specifically used what came out of Eddie's seminar.
[01:04:48.820 --> 01:04:54.820]  And beat him up with it to the point that they did not want to get me in front of a jury.
[01:04:54.820 --> 01:04:59.820]  Absolutely get Eddie's seminar.
[01:04:59.820 --> 01:05:06.820]  The 90% of us only deal with the legal system on traffic tickets.
[01:05:06.820 --> 01:05:10.820]  And it is the cheapest education you could get.
[01:05:10.820 --> 01:05:15.820]  And Eddie's seminar is the cheapest law school you'll ever go to.
[01:05:15.820 --> 01:05:20.820]  Absolutely go to that. How many people drive down the road, and those lights come on,
[01:05:20.820 --> 01:05:26.820]  and you look in the rear of your mirror, and you feel this hollow space in the pit of your stomach.
[01:05:26.820 --> 01:05:33.820]  I got Eddie's material. I see those lights come on. I look up in the rear of your mirror, and I think, go ahead, Bubba.
[01:05:33.820 --> 01:05:41.820]  Take your best shot. I'll give you a romp through the legal system. You are not going to believe me.
[01:05:41.820 --> 01:05:49.820]  So, by all means, go to Logos Radio Network and get Eddie's traffic seminar.
[01:05:49.820 --> 01:06:02.820]  As far as learning how to protect your rights in every avenue of legal endeavor, this is absolutely the best place to start.
[01:06:02.820 --> 01:06:05.820]  And that's my story, and I'm sticking to it.
[01:06:05.820 --> 01:06:12.820]  Well, I appreciate that it turned out to be useful forever for the folks on the show as well as those out there in Radio Land listening to us.
[01:06:12.820 --> 01:06:19.820]  So far, I haven't had anyone come to me with any actual complaints about anything in the seminar,
[01:06:19.820 --> 01:06:23.820]  except they didn't know how to absorb it as fast as they needed to.
[01:06:23.820 --> 01:06:30.820]  That part I can't really help you with, folks, but the fact is, is I worked my butt off on the research
[01:06:30.820 --> 01:06:35.820]  that went into every pleading and every word that's in that book in relation to what we have.
[01:06:35.820 --> 01:06:45.820]  And my knowledge of it now is tenfold compared to what it was in 2009 when I only had two months to produce that book and those legal pleadings.
[01:06:45.820 --> 01:06:46.820]  Remember that.
[01:06:46.820 --> 01:06:57.820]  Well, I do have a comment on that. I have seen Eddie, and he has not worked his butt off. He has still got it.
[01:06:57.820 --> 01:07:03.820]  Unfortunately, it's getting as big as my chair, and I need to solve that problem, too.
[01:07:03.820 --> 01:07:10.820]  Okay. Thank you all for paying attention to me or listening, and I'm going to drop off and let Eddie Average show back.
[01:07:10.820 --> 01:07:12.820]  All right, Randy. Thanks for calling in. I appreciate it.
[01:07:12.820 --> 01:07:13.820]  Good night.
[01:07:13.820 --> 01:07:20.820]  Good night. All right. Now we are going to start in with the callers we do have, and that starts with Eric in Texas.
[01:07:20.820 --> 01:07:23.820]  Eric, what can we do for you?
[01:07:23.820 --> 01:07:36.820]  Yes, sir. Eddie, I ended up getting pulled over about a month ago and just north of the beginning, and it was for a speeding violation.
[01:07:36.820 --> 01:07:40.820]  You said – whoa, whoa, whoa. Hold on. You said it's for speeding?
[01:07:40.820 --> 01:07:41.820]  Yes, sir.
[01:07:41.820 --> 01:07:48.820]  Okay. Just real quick, are you on a headset or a speakerphone, or you just have really bad signal?
[01:07:48.820 --> 01:07:51.820]  Talking directly into my phone.
[01:07:51.820 --> 01:07:58.820]  Okay, because you're kind of warbling a bit, so you're kind of distorted. But go ahead. We'll try to make work through it.
[01:07:58.820 --> 01:08:11.820]  Okay. I have a speeding violation just north of McKinney, and like I said, I didn't follow your script because I wasn't aware of your script.
[01:08:11.820 --> 01:08:23.820]  I'm pretty new to your whole program here. Anyway, I was wondering if – how do I go about getting the help that I need?
[01:08:23.820 --> 01:08:31.820]  Right now I have a attorney that is out of Avon, Texas, and I was just wondering –
[01:08:31.820 --> 01:08:34.820]  You have an attorney for a speeding ticket?
[01:08:34.820 --> 01:08:50.820]  Yes, sir. Due to the fact that I travel nationwide, and at the time I was on no business. I didn't state that or anything like that. But I was just traveling home.
[01:08:50.820 --> 01:09:10.820]  Okay. You need to go to tauoflaw.wordpress.com, and on there is a document relating to the fact that Texas has no set speed limits, and it never has.
[01:09:10.820 --> 01:09:18.820]  You need to download that document. You need to make your attorney read it.
[01:09:18.820 --> 01:09:20.820]  Okay.
[01:09:20.820 --> 01:09:23.820]  But make sure you read it first.
[01:09:23.820 --> 01:09:26.820]  Okay.
[01:09:26.820 --> 01:09:38.820]  And then tell him that if he doesn't understand the statutes and the commentary in that document well enough to get this case dismissed without any further ado, you're going to sue his butt for malpractice,
[01:09:38.820 --> 01:09:46.820]  and you're going to file a bar grievance for the fact that he was ineffective as your counsel.
[01:09:46.820 --> 01:09:49.820]  Okay.
[01:09:49.820 --> 01:09:55.820]  All right, Ross. Thank you, Mr. Eddie, and I'll get on the homework now.
[01:09:55.820 --> 01:10:06.820]  All right. Well, while you're there, you also need to go to logosradionetwork.com forward slash T-A-O, Tango Alpha Omega.
[01:10:06.820 --> 01:10:21.820]  On there you will find two sample scripts, one for the transportation stops and one for cross-examination. Get those, learn those, especially the transportation script.
[01:10:21.820 --> 01:10:29.820]  Yes, sir. I have the transportation script. I've actually made an audio version of it so that I can listen to it.
[01:10:29.820 --> 01:10:33.820]  You're not the one that wrote that rap song on it, are you?
[01:10:33.820 --> 01:10:37.820]  No, sir. I'm too much of a country hick.
[01:10:37.820 --> 01:10:46.820]  Okay. Somebody took my transportation script and converted it into a rap song and put a video of it up on YouTube.
[01:10:46.820 --> 01:11:00.820]  No, sir. Like I said, I'm fairly new to your program. One of my buddies in South Texas introduced me to you, and so far I have to say you do a lot of great work, and I really appreciate it.
[01:11:00.820 --> 01:11:05.820]  Well, I appreciate the commentary and the kudos. Thank you.
[01:11:05.820 --> 01:11:06.820]  Yes, sir.
[01:11:06.820 --> 01:11:09.820]  All right. Well, good luck and beat them up.
[01:11:09.820 --> 01:11:11.820]  Yes, sir. Appreciate that.
[01:11:11.820 --> 01:11:13.820]  Yes, sir. You have a good night.
[01:11:13.820 --> 01:11:20.820]  All right. Now we're going to go to Nick in California. Nick, what can we do for you?
[01:11:20.820 --> 01:11:22.820]  Hi, Eddie. How are you doing?
[01:11:22.820 --> 01:11:27.820]  Good so far. I'm assuming you aren't if you're calling in.
[01:11:27.820 --> 01:11:33.820]  Yes. Well, I mean, all right. But I have a question for me.
[01:11:33.820 --> 01:11:40.820]  Nick, you keep fading out. Are you not talking directly into your phone or on a headset or something?
[01:11:40.820 --> 01:11:42.820]  Oh, here. Is that better?
[01:11:42.820 --> 01:11:44.820]  Much.
[01:11:44.820 --> 01:12:06.820]  Okay. I got a ticket a few months ago by the CFP, and in doing my research for the ticket, I was looking at—after listening to your traffic seminar, I had got the idea to look up the O's of officers for the officers.
[01:12:06.820 --> 01:12:16.820]  And in California law, in the government code 1353 says that all state officers must have an oath of office on file with the secretary of state.
[01:12:16.820 --> 01:12:23.820]  And being that California Highway Patrol have statewide jurisdiction, they were classified under that.
[01:12:23.820 --> 01:12:32.820]  So I contacted the secretary of state, and they told me that that was the right place of contacting to get a copy of the oath of office.
[01:12:32.820 --> 01:12:42.820]  But they told me that they do not keep any oath of office on file for the CHP, that the CHP headquarters keeps them on file.
[01:12:42.820 --> 01:12:53.820]  And so my question is, that's not really my problem if they don't have that on file with them because—
[01:12:53.820 --> 01:13:04.820]  Not if the law specifically requires them to have it, but if it doesn't, then some other custodian of records could have it, and that's who you have to file with to get it.
[01:13:04.820 --> 01:13:10.820]  Whoever the officially, statutorily defined custodian of records for that information is, is who will have it.
[01:13:10.820 --> 01:13:17.820]  If it's not the secretary of state, it is in fact the DPS, then that's who you have to get it from.
[01:13:17.820 --> 01:13:25.820]  But you're going to have to probably do it through a public information request or whatever it's called in California, open records, whatever.
[01:13:25.820 --> 01:13:35.820]  Yeah. Okay. Yeah, because the government code specifically says that all state officers must have it on file with the secretary of state.
[01:13:35.820 --> 01:13:44.820]  Okay. Does it define the term all, or does it specifically list Department of Public Safety as one of those officers?
[01:13:44.820 --> 01:13:46.820]  No.
[01:13:46.820 --> 01:13:55.820]  Then that could be argued as to whether or not you need to find something that says DPS is classified as a state officer.
[01:13:55.820 --> 01:14:02.820]  If you get that, then you can use that to say the statute says he has to have it up here.
[01:14:02.820 --> 01:14:05.820]  Why don't you have it?
[01:14:05.820 --> 01:14:21.820]  Okay. Okay. And then my next question is, I had filed an information request with the local field office CHP for the audio and video from their cruiser cams.
[01:14:21.820 --> 01:14:26.820]  And I received all of that, the DVD and everything of my stop.
[01:14:26.820 --> 01:14:33.820]  And the audio is missing for the entire stop, and even after they had removed me from vehicle, it's still missing.
[01:14:33.820 --> 01:14:36.820]  And then the very, very end of it, it cuts back in.
[01:14:36.820 --> 01:14:50.820]  And I'm just wondering, I wasn't unfortunately recording, so I'm just wondering if there's any way to get to make them give up the rest of the audio.
[01:14:50.820 --> 01:14:55.820]  Well, you can do it through discovery if you're not able to do it through public information.
[01:14:55.820 --> 01:14:57.820]  Okay.
[01:14:57.820 --> 01:15:02.820]  All right. Now the other issue here is you said this was for speeding, right?
[01:15:02.820 --> 01:15:06.820]  Speeding in California is an infraction, right?
[01:15:06.820 --> 01:15:07.820]  Yes.
[01:15:07.820 --> 01:15:23.820]  And you realize that there is one dissenting opinion in one district appellate court about infractions are crimes, and then there are several dissenting opinions that says infractions are not crimes in California,
[01:15:23.820 --> 01:15:38.820]  which means if they stopped you without a warrant, they broke the law and the initial stop was illegal, and thus everything after the fact was fruit of the poison tree.
[01:15:38.820 --> 01:15:40.820]  Yeah, I understand that.
[01:15:40.820 --> 01:15:49.820]  I've done a lot of research into that, and I am having problems finding the case law pertaining to-
[01:15:49.820 --> 01:15:53.820]  If you have it, send me an email and I will send it to you.
[01:15:53.820 --> 01:15:56.820]  All right. Well, I believe you've forwarded me the one case that-
[01:15:56.820 --> 01:15:58.820]  I've got more.
[01:15:58.820 --> 01:15:59.820]  Oh, you do?
[01:15:59.820 --> 01:16:00.820]  Yes.
[01:16:00.820 --> 01:16:04.820]  Okay, awesome. I'll send you an email as soon as we connect on the phone.
[01:16:04.820 --> 01:16:08.820]  Okay. And all right, that would be awesome.
[01:16:08.820 --> 01:16:10.820]  All right, that's it.
[01:16:10.820 --> 01:16:23.820]  All right, just send me an email to Eddie at ruleoflawradio.com and let me know that you need the California case law on infractions are not crimes, and I'll get all that attached and sent back to you as quick as I can.
[01:16:23.820 --> 01:16:25.820]  All right, thank you very much, Eddie.
[01:16:25.820 --> 01:16:26.820]  You're welcome.
[01:16:26.820 --> 01:16:27.820]  Bye.
[01:16:27.820 --> 01:16:35.820]  Bye-bye. All right, now we're going to go to a break, and we'll start with some more calls when we get back.
[01:16:35.820 --> 01:16:40.820]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:40.820 --> 01:16:41.820]  We've got three more segments.
[01:16:41.820 --> 01:17:00.820]  That means 45 minutes, so y'all hang in there, and we'll be right back to continue on with your calls.
[01:17:00.820 --> 01:17:08.820]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:08.820 --> 01:17:14.820]  We provide a wide assortment of your favorite products featuring a great selection of high-quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.820 --> 01:17:18.820]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:17:18.820 --> 01:17:23.820]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:17:23.820 --> 01:17:26.820]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:17:26.820 --> 01:17:31.820]  In addition, we carry popular young Jeopardy products such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burps.
[01:17:31.820 --> 01:17:38.820]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:38.820 --> 01:17:42.820]  We broker metals IRA accounts, and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:17:42.820 --> 01:17:45.820]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:17:45.820 --> 01:17:50.820]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:17:50.820 --> 01:17:53.820]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:17:53.820 --> 01:17:59.820]  Visit us at capitalcoin and bullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:17:59.820 --> 01:18:06.820]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area of nutrition.
[01:18:06.820 --> 01:18:11.820]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we changed all that.
[01:18:11.820 --> 01:18:17.820]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[01:18:17.820 --> 01:18:25.820]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jeopardy can provide the nutrients you need.
[01:18:25.820 --> 01:18:31.820]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[01:18:31.820 --> 01:18:39.820]  We have come to trust young Jeopardy so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[01:18:39.820 --> 01:18:47.820]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[01:18:47.820 --> 01:18:51.820]  As you realize the benefits of young Jeopardy, you may want to join us.
[01:18:51.820 --> 01:18:58.820]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[01:18:58.820 --> 01:19:00.820]  Order now.
[01:19:00.820 --> 01:19:10.820]  This is the Logos Radio Network.
[01:19:30.820 --> 01:19:40.820]  All right, folks, we are back.
[01:19:40.820 --> 01:19:47.820]  This is Rule of Law Radio, calling number 512-646-1984, and we are going to John in Illinois.
[01:19:47.820 --> 01:19:49.820]  John, what can we do for you?
[01:19:49.820 --> 01:19:51.820]  Can you hear me?
[01:19:51.820 --> 01:19:54.820]  Yeah, except you're echoing really bad.
[01:19:54.820 --> 01:19:57.820]  Oh, man, we moved to a better part of the building.
[01:19:57.820 --> 01:20:01.820]  Are you in like a warehouse, a bathroom, or a barrel?
[01:20:01.820 --> 01:20:05.820]  I'm a custodian in a public school.
[01:20:05.820 --> 01:20:07.820]  Ah, okay, that's better.
[01:20:07.820 --> 01:20:13.820]  All right, let me ask you, you had a caller several months ago, Dusty in Texas.
[01:20:13.820 --> 01:20:15.820]  Any update on that?
[01:20:15.820 --> 01:20:17.820]  Dusty in Texas?
[01:20:17.820 --> 01:20:24.820]  Yeah, she was a female, and she wasn't going to enter a plea, and they tased her and threw her in jail for about four days.
[01:20:24.820 --> 01:20:27.820]  And I made a YouTube out of that phone call.
[01:20:27.820 --> 01:20:32.820]  So if you Google, you know, Eddie Craig, Dusty in Texas, I made a YouTube.
[01:20:32.820 --> 01:20:34.820]  It's like 25 minutes.
[01:20:34.820 --> 01:20:36.820]  Okay, how long ago was this?
[01:20:36.820 --> 01:20:40.820]  Ah, it could have been three, four months ago.
[01:20:40.820 --> 01:20:48.820]  Okay, yeah, by the time I do several of these shows in my daily consultations, I'm lucky if I can remember my own name, much less anybody else's.
[01:20:48.820 --> 01:20:50.820]  There you go, okay.
[01:20:50.820 --> 01:20:56.820]  No, it was a story, and I mean, the judge and everybody just stepped in it.
[01:20:56.820 --> 01:20:58.820]  And you were like, oh, goody!
[01:20:58.820 --> 01:21:02.820]  I mean, you just wanted to destroy these people, and it sounded like you were going to help her out.
[01:21:02.820 --> 01:21:07.820]  I actually haven't heard anything else from her that I'm aware of.
[01:21:07.820 --> 01:21:09.820]  Okay, all right.
[01:21:09.820 --> 01:21:17.820]  Well, like I said, that was a real quality phone call and crazy situation, so I made a YouTube out of it.
[01:21:17.820 --> 01:21:19.820]  Get the word out.
[01:21:19.820 --> 01:21:29.820]  But the reason I'm calling you this, I mean, last week, you know, you went on a pretty passionate rant twice when you were talking about your car being taken.
[01:21:29.820 --> 01:21:35.820]  And I don't know if you knew, but the next day, Alex Jones had a debate with David Dew.
[01:21:35.820 --> 01:21:37.820]  Did you hear about that this week?
[01:21:37.820 --> 01:21:38.820]  I've heard about it.
[01:21:38.820 --> 01:21:41.820]  I hadn't actually seen it or heard anything specific.
[01:21:41.820 --> 01:21:49.820]  I'll tell you what, that was a major earthquake in the Patriots community or whatever movement we got going on in this country.
[01:21:49.820 --> 01:21:51.820]  Let me give you something real quick, okay?
[01:21:51.820 --> 01:21:53.820]  I bought a history book.
[01:21:53.820 --> 01:21:56.820]  You're familiar with David Barton from Wall Builders?
[01:21:56.820 --> 01:21:57.820]  No.
[01:21:57.820 --> 01:21:58.820]  In Aledo, Texas?
[01:21:58.820 --> 01:21:59.820]  No.
[01:21:59.820 --> 01:22:05.820]  He has like 200 original pieces of Americana that predate 1820.
[01:22:05.820 --> 01:22:12.820]  I bought a history book from 1844 on eBay, and here's a clip.
[01:22:12.820 --> 01:22:13.820]  You'll like this.
[01:22:13.820 --> 01:22:22.820]  Had the rulers in England undertaken to oppress the people there in the same manner, they would have rebelled, much more the Americans.
[01:22:22.820 --> 01:22:28.820]  They, as we have seen, had grown up in their new countries with a deep sense of the rights of the people.
[01:22:28.820 --> 01:22:31.820]  Toil and danger had made them strong and brave.
[01:22:31.820 --> 01:22:38.820]  When they saw that the rulers of Great Britain had determined on making them submit to their unrighteous will, they became alarmed.
[01:22:38.820 --> 01:22:44.820]  They resolved that they would first endeavor by petition to bring them into a better mind.
[01:22:44.820 --> 01:22:49.820]  If, after that, they persisted in their oppressions, they would refuse to submit.
[01:22:49.820 --> 01:22:56.820]  And if force was employed against them, repel it by force, trusting that a righteous God would aid their cause.
[01:22:56.820 --> 01:23:02.820]  That is how history was taught in America before the Civil War.
[01:23:02.820 --> 01:23:07.820]  That's how history was actually created in America before the Civil War.
[01:23:07.820 --> 01:23:10.820]  Yes, it was.
[01:23:10.820 --> 01:23:20.820]  No, I mean, listening to what happened with your cars and that, I mean, if it was an episode of Bonanza or The Riflemen, you would have shot those guys for coming on your property to deal with your property.
[01:23:20.820 --> 01:23:23.820]  Yeah, and the marshal would have been right there to back me up.
[01:23:23.820 --> 01:23:28.820]  He had got them for basically what would equate to horse thieving.
[01:23:28.820 --> 01:23:30.820]  OK, I mean, did you literally watch them take the cars?
[01:23:30.820 --> 01:23:34.820]  No, no, no. Both times they showed up when no one was here.
[01:23:34.820 --> 01:23:38.820]  OK, and then we can assume they know who you are?
[01:23:38.820 --> 01:23:43.820]  They know you've got a radio show, blah, blah, blah, just like they know Alex Jones is on?
[01:23:43.820 --> 01:23:53.820]  No, we cannot make that assumption because I keep where I stay and live completely separate from what I do.
[01:23:53.820 --> 01:24:00.820]  OK, but they would most likely come on your property, see you have no tags, run the VIN number, find out who it belongs to, I don't know.
[01:24:00.820 --> 01:24:05.820]  Yeah, but it's not registered to me. I have them both on bills of sale.
[01:24:05.820 --> 01:24:06.820]  OK.
[01:24:06.820 --> 01:24:10.820]  Which are not on the cars or in them.
[01:24:10.820 --> 01:24:17.820]  Well, I just want to let you know the sleeping giant is awake in this country right now.
[01:24:17.820 --> 01:24:22.820]  And basically what happened with David Duke and Alex Jones, David Duke just threw facts at them.
[01:24:22.820 --> 01:24:30.820]  The same Pharisees, Sadducees, and scribes that Jesus lit up in Matthew 23 and called all sorts of names,
[01:24:30.820 --> 01:24:35.820]  those are the same people that are running our justice system, our government, our banking system.
[01:24:35.820 --> 01:24:41.820]  And the fact of the matter is David Duke put his finger on it and he said it was Jewish supremacism.
[01:24:41.820 --> 01:24:43.820]  These people have never changed.
[01:24:43.820 --> 01:24:48.820]  They follow the Christians wherever they go in the world, westward, and they just harass the crap out of them
[01:24:48.820 --> 01:24:52.820]  and bribe whoever they have to as far as gentiles to get their way.
[01:24:52.820 --> 01:24:56.820]  And it's really just gotten absolutely out of control.
[01:24:56.820 --> 01:25:03.820]  Now you've got Donald Trump running around talking about immigration, you're there in Texas, everybody thinks that he's some kind of white supremacist.
[01:25:03.820 --> 01:25:05.820]  He's not a white supremacist.
[01:25:05.820 --> 01:25:12.820]  He's going to do for Israel exactly what every other candidate is going to do for Israel with his finished blowing up those seven countries over there
[01:25:12.820 --> 01:25:17.820]  so they can have their big greater Israel from now to the Euphrates.
[01:25:17.820 --> 01:25:28.820]  I mean, and what's difficult for me is to think that you need money to file a Title 42 federal lawsuit against tyrants.
[01:25:28.820 --> 01:25:41.820]  Now, it's gotten so out of control, they stole your property from you, yet you've got to pay money to go and either get it back or set precedent or make a case.
[01:25:41.820 --> 01:25:46.820]  You want to go get your day in court, argue, get your property back, and that's going to cost you money.
[01:25:46.820 --> 01:25:47.820]  Exactly.
[01:25:47.820 --> 01:25:49.820]  I mean, that's just tyranny.
[01:25:49.820 --> 01:25:54.820]  And that's because the courts have turned it into a revenue system instead of a justice system.
[01:25:54.820 --> 01:26:06.820]  That's the attorney's fault because the whole point of this is my harm occurred when my property was taken without my consent, not when I had to pay to get it back.
[01:26:06.820 --> 01:26:10.820]  But the courts have made it exactly that way.
[01:26:10.820 --> 01:26:15.820]  Until I actually try to get it back and it costs me something, I have no loss.
[01:26:15.820 --> 01:26:19.820]  That we can blame entirely on the attorneys.
[01:26:19.820 --> 01:26:29.820]  One hundred percent, without a doubt, string them from a tree, run them over with a truck, drag them behind a wagon through a field of cactus and bedrock.
[01:26:29.820 --> 01:26:35.820]  I ain't going to break a sweat over it or opine with one tear.
[01:26:35.820 --> 01:26:36.820]  Okay.
[01:26:36.820 --> 01:26:47.820]  And I mean, again, whatever law enforcement agency showed up on your property, then they probably called a towing company and said, take this car, right?
[01:26:47.820 --> 01:26:48.820]  Right.
[01:26:48.820 --> 01:26:52.820]  No judicial interaction in it whatsoever.
[01:26:52.820 --> 01:26:58.820]  Suppose you were at your property and you saw these people pull up and start mulling over your car and then you saw a tow truck.
[01:26:58.820 --> 01:27:00.820]  What would you have said?
[01:27:00.820 --> 01:27:02.820]  I'd have told them to put the car down and leave it alone.
[01:27:02.820 --> 01:27:04.820]  They would have immediately called a cop.
[01:27:04.820 --> 01:27:07.820]  The cop would have come and threatened me with his gun.
[01:27:07.820 --> 01:27:10.820]  Now I've got a bigger lawsuit.
[01:27:10.820 --> 01:27:11.820]  Yeah.
[01:27:11.820 --> 01:27:12.820]  Okay.
[01:27:12.820 --> 01:27:14.820]  Well, I'm just I'm letting you know, man.
[01:27:14.820 --> 01:27:24.820]  We are awake out here and we've about had enough and the more they push these race riots between the immigrations and the Black Lives Matter, they're trying to provoke.
[01:27:24.820 --> 01:27:26.820]  They're trying to provoke white people.
[01:27:26.820 --> 01:27:34.820]  I mean, if you hashtag white genocide, you're going to find out that there's all kinds of people out there in the political sphere that know exactly what's going on.
[01:27:34.820 --> 01:27:36.820]  And that's basically what it is.
[01:27:36.820 --> 01:27:38.820]  It's anything anti-white.
[01:27:38.820 --> 01:27:40.820]  And they're trying to provoke a reaction out of us.
[01:27:40.820 --> 01:27:42.820]  But we're too smart to go.
[01:27:42.820 --> 01:27:45.820]  It's like you said, you can teach everybody the transportation.
[01:27:45.820 --> 01:27:47.820]  Randy Kelton can teach the thing.
[01:27:47.820 --> 01:27:48.820]  We can study it.
[01:27:48.820 --> 01:27:50.820]  We can go into court and whip their butt.
[01:27:50.820 --> 01:27:52.820]  But they keep pushing and pushing and pushing.
[01:27:52.820 --> 01:27:54.820]  And now they stole your property.
[01:27:54.820 --> 01:28:02.820]  And like I said, if it was if you were Chuck Conner and it was the rifleman, you'd point your gun right at the tow truck driver and go get them.
[01:28:02.820 --> 01:28:04.820]  F off my property.
[01:28:04.820 --> 01:28:07.820]  Get your hands off that car.
[01:28:07.820 --> 01:28:08.820]  That would be correct.
[01:28:08.820 --> 01:28:12.820]  It just reached that level, Eddie.
[01:28:12.820 --> 01:28:14.820]  So don't lose any faith.
[01:28:14.820 --> 01:28:18.820]  I don't have a pot to pee in or a window to throw it at a man.
[01:28:18.820 --> 01:28:20.820]  I mean, honestly, I'm making 15 bucks an hour.
[01:28:20.820 --> 01:28:30.820]  But because I'm divorced, because I became a patriot 15 years into my marriage, I get a paycheck of $500 every two weeks, even though it says I make 15 bucks an hour.
[01:28:30.820 --> 01:28:32.820]  So I'm barely getting by.
[01:28:32.820 --> 01:28:34.820]  Most of us are barely getting by.
[01:28:34.820 --> 01:28:36.820]  But we know exactly what's going on.
[01:28:36.820 --> 01:28:45.820]  Everybody needs to go and watch what happens between David Duke and Alex Jones, because Alex Jones has done a little bit of a disservice running cover for Zionists for too long.
[01:28:45.820 --> 01:28:46.820]  And this has got to stop.
[01:28:46.820 --> 01:28:50.820]  And we have no Republican candidates that are going to do anything different.
[01:28:50.820 --> 01:28:52.820]  They all want to keep blowing up the Middle East.
[01:28:52.820 --> 01:28:54.820]  And I think the Christians are awakening to it.
[01:28:54.820 --> 01:28:57.820]  So.
[01:28:57.820 --> 01:29:00.820]  Well, all that is possible.
[01:29:00.820 --> 01:29:02.820]  All right, my friend, will you take care and have faith, man?
[01:29:02.820 --> 01:29:03.820]  We got your back.
[01:29:03.820 --> 01:29:04.820]  All right.
[01:29:04.820 --> 01:29:05.820]  I appreciate that, John.
[01:29:05.820 --> 01:29:07.820]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:29:07.820 --> 01:29:08.820]  All right.
[01:29:08.820 --> 01:29:09.820]  All right.
[01:29:09.820 --> 01:29:14.820]  OK, I'm only a few seconds away from having a break here, so I won't start up any other callers when we get back.
[01:29:14.820 --> 01:29:17.820]  I'll have J.D., then Jimmy and Maryland.
[01:29:17.820 --> 01:29:22.820]  And I don't know who M in Texas is, but I guess I will find out when we get that far.
[01:29:22.820 --> 01:29:24.820]  All right, folks, we're coming up on our break.
[01:29:24.820 --> 01:29:27.820]  I have a half an hour left in the show.
[01:29:27.820 --> 01:29:36.820]  If we get through all these callers that are up here, which right now that's three, the call in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:29:36.820 --> 01:29:37.820]  So go ahead and get in line.
[01:29:37.820 --> 01:29:39.820]  If I can get to you, I will.
[01:29:39.820 --> 01:29:41.820]  I will do my very best.
[01:29:41.820 --> 01:29:43.820]  So, y'all, please hang in there, folks.
[01:29:43.820 --> 01:29:46.820]  Don't let anybody hang up, because I'll get you when we get back.
[01:29:46.820 --> 01:29:47.820]  OK.
[01:29:47.820 --> 01:29:48.820]  Y'all hang on.
[01:29:48.820 --> 01:30:02.820]  We'll be right back in a moment.
[01:30:02.820 --> 01:30:04.820]  Listen up, Mom and Dad.
[01:30:04.820 --> 01:30:09.820]  Ditch those cigarettes and stop lighting up, if you care about your kids' brains, that is.
[01:30:09.820 --> 01:30:16.820]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll have the details on a new study on the dangers of secondhand smoke right after this.
[01:30:16.820 --> 01:30:18.820]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.820 --> 01:30:21.820]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.820 --> 01:30:26.820]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[01:30:26.820 --> 01:30:28.820]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.820 --> 01:30:31.820]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.820 --> 01:30:34.820]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.820 --> 01:30:41.820]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.820 --> 01:30:45.820]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.820 --> 01:30:49.820]  As if you needed another reason to quit smoking, here's one more.
[01:30:49.820 --> 01:30:56.820]  A new study shows kids exposed to secondhand smoke at home have lower IQs and do worse on achievement tests.
[01:30:56.820 --> 01:31:04.820]  Ohio researchers studied more than 4,000 children aged 6 to 16 and gave them math, reading, and memory tests.
[01:31:04.820 --> 01:31:11.820]  The kids with higher blood levels of cotinine, a breakdown product of nicotine, scored worse than their peers.
[01:31:11.820 --> 01:31:15.820]  In fact, those kids' IQs were 2 to 5 points lower.
[01:31:15.820 --> 01:31:18.820]  So the next time you're tempted to flick that big, think twice.
[01:31:18.820 --> 01:31:23.820]  You may be turning your kids' brain cells to ashes right along with that cigarette.
[01:31:23.820 --> 01:31:30.820]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:30.820 --> 01:31:36.820]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:36.820 --> 01:31:38.820]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:38.820 --> 01:31:43.820]  Over 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:43.820 --> 01:31:46.820]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:46.820 --> 01:31:48.820]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:48.820 --> 01:31:50.820]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:50.820 --> 01:31:51.820]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:51.820 --> 01:31:52.820]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[01:31:52.820 --> 01:31:53.820]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:53.820 --> 01:31:55.820]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:55.820 --> 01:31:57.820]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:57.820 --> 01:32:10.820]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:27.820 --> 01:32:50.820]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:32:50.820 --> 01:32:57.820]  And that's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.820 --> 01:32:59.820]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.820 --> 01:33:26.820]  We actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:26.820 --> 01:33:48.820]  Hi, folks.
[01:33:48.820 --> 01:33:49.820]  We are back.
[01:33:49.820 --> 01:33:51.820]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:51.820 --> 01:33:55.820]  And right now we are going to go to JD in Texas.
[01:33:55.820 --> 01:33:57.820]  JD, what do you got?
[01:33:57.820 --> 01:33:58.820]  Hey, how are you doing?
[01:33:58.820 --> 01:33:59.820]  All right.
[01:33:59.820 --> 01:34:00.820]  How are you?
[01:34:00.820 --> 01:34:01.820]  All good.
[01:34:01.820 --> 01:34:06.820]  Hey, before I ask you my question, and I like to say something real fast.
[01:34:06.820 --> 01:34:09.820]  And I've been listening to you for a while, and you know that now.
[01:34:09.820 --> 01:34:16.820]  But to all those, man, I just, I'm amazed by how many people are trying to call in and educate
[01:34:16.820 --> 01:34:19.820]  Ed Craig about this now, whatever it's like.
[01:34:19.820 --> 01:34:23.820]  Folks, if you've got a question for Eddie, please just call in and ask the question.
[01:34:23.820 --> 01:34:25.820]  Don't try to educate the man.
[01:34:25.820 --> 01:34:28.820]  He already knows more than you ever will know.
[01:34:28.820 --> 01:34:31.820]  And he's already helped me in a lot of different ways.
[01:34:31.820 --> 01:34:34.820]  But it just, folks, it gets annoying in a way.
[01:34:34.820 --> 01:34:36.820]  But the man knows what he's doing.
[01:34:36.820 --> 01:34:40.820]  If you've got a question for him, ask him the question and listen to him.
[01:34:40.820 --> 01:34:43.820]  If you don't understand it, ask him the question again.
[01:34:43.820 --> 01:34:44.820]  Ask him to understand.
[01:34:44.820 --> 01:34:45.820]  Say, Eddie, I don't understand.
[01:34:45.820 --> 01:34:48.820]  Would you please explain that again to me?
[01:34:48.820 --> 01:34:51.820]  And he won't have any problem explaining it to you.
[01:34:51.820 --> 01:34:56.820]  Some of those that call in and you hear Eddie get upset or frustrated,
[01:34:56.820 --> 01:35:00.820]  it's because there's only so many ways you can say the same thing.
[01:35:00.820 --> 01:35:04.820]  But anyways, I'm sorry, Eddie, I had to go on that because I keep hearing this.
[01:35:04.820 --> 01:35:05.820]  I've been listening.
[01:35:05.820 --> 01:35:06.820]  That's okay.
[01:35:06.820 --> 01:35:08.820]  Just so folks know, that was not solicited by me.
[01:35:08.820 --> 01:35:13.820]  That's JD's approach to problem solutions here.
[01:35:13.820 --> 01:35:15.820]  And that's exactly right.
[01:35:15.820 --> 01:35:22.820]  I listened to Eddie's first show in 2010 in the Art Cousin Rule Aloud Radio Network.
[01:35:22.820 --> 01:35:27.820]  And I've been hearing the same sorts of things over and over and over to the point where
[01:35:27.820 --> 01:35:30.820]  I already know what is the law in your state.
[01:35:30.820 --> 01:35:31.820]  Is it a civil law?
[01:35:31.820 --> 01:35:32.820]  Is it a case law?
[01:35:32.820 --> 01:35:33.820]  I mean, is it criminal?
[01:35:33.820 --> 01:35:34.820]  Is it civil?
[01:35:34.820 --> 01:35:36.820]  What's the law of state in your case for your case?
[01:35:36.820 --> 01:35:40.820]  I mean, over and over again, I don't know how many times Eddie's got to say it.
[01:35:40.820 --> 01:35:45.820]  Folks, please listen to him and understand what he's trying to say and listen to him.
[01:35:45.820 --> 01:35:48.820]  But anyways, I'm sorry, Eddie, I had to do that.
[01:35:48.820 --> 01:35:53.820]  But Eddie, I actually messaged you just a few minutes ago not thinking I was going to
[01:35:53.820 --> 01:35:55.820]  be able to get through.
[01:35:55.820 --> 01:36:01.820]  And Randy was on earlier, and I know that Randy is into the mortgage law and this and
[01:36:01.820 --> 01:36:02.820]  that.
[01:36:02.820 --> 01:36:08.820]  And I didn't know who he was going to be on when I sent you the message at the time.
[01:36:08.820 --> 01:36:14.820]  But Eddie, basically, I'm getting to a point to where I'm able to do something to benefit
[01:36:14.820 --> 01:36:16.820]  my family financially.
[01:36:16.820 --> 01:36:21.820]  And I'm looking to get into some real estate things and try to touch my family up.
[01:36:21.820 --> 01:36:23.820]  So basically, I was looking at it.
[01:36:23.820 --> 01:36:28.820]  I was going to ask you if you knew where I could look or whom I could talk to to find
[01:36:28.820 --> 01:36:32.820]  out more about what the Texas real estate laws are so I could study up on some of those
[01:36:32.820 --> 01:36:33.820]  things.
[01:36:33.820 --> 01:36:34.820]  Yeah, I can.
[01:36:34.820 --> 01:36:36.820]  You need to talk to a realtor.
[01:36:36.820 --> 01:36:37.820]  Don't talk to an attorney.
[01:36:37.820 --> 01:36:38.820]  Talk to a realtor.
[01:36:38.820 --> 01:36:44.820]  Realtors are required to know the law because they are one of the only people outside of
[01:36:44.820 --> 01:36:50.820]  attorneys that are allowed to prepare documentation relating to the release or transfer of a
[01:36:50.820 --> 01:36:52.820]  lien or real property.
[01:36:52.820 --> 01:36:53.820]  Okay.
[01:36:53.820 --> 01:36:54.820]  All right.
[01:36:54.820 --> 01:36:55.820]  So they know what the law is.
[01:36:55.820 --> 01:37:00.820]  The problem you're going to have, though, is that the law is not all in one place.
[01:37:00.820 --> 01:37:02.820]  You're going to deal with contract law.
[01:37:02.820 --> 01:37:03.820]  You're going to deal with the property code.
[01:37:03.820 --> 01:37:07.820]  Then you're going to deal with the things relating to other than exchanging that property
[01:37:07.820 --> 01:37:09.820]  and transferring it.
[01:37:09.820 --> 01:37:16.820]  You're going to be into all kinds of areas when you start dealing with property provided,
[01:37:16.820 --> 01:37:20.820]  of course, you're talking about land or homes.
[01:37:20.820 --> 01:37:24.820]  Well, basically, in particular, to answer your question, I'm talking about like rental
[01:37:24.820 --> 01:37:26.820]  homes or properties.
[01:37:26.820 --> 01:37:31.820]  Well, still, that's land and homes, whether they're rentals or not, irrelevant.
[01:37:31.820 --> 01:37:37.820]  The laws will be different for each of those aspects, but that's still the type of property
[01:37:37.820 --> 01:37:40.820]  we're talking about.
[01:37:40.820 --> 01:37:43.820]  The use is separate.
[01:37:43.820 --> 01:37:44.820]  Okay.
[01:37:44.820 --> 01:37:53.820]  So basically what you're saying, though, is that whereas typically we cannot go into a
[01:37:53.820 --> 01:38:00.820]  courtroom and trust an attorney, we can more or less trust a realtor.
[01:38:00.820 --> 01:38:04.820]  Unless they're actually handling your property agreement for you.
[01:38:04.820 --> 01:38:05.820]  Yeah.
[01:38:05.820 --> 01:38:08.820]  If they have no interest in what you're doing one way or the other, then you probably could
[01:38:08.820 --> 01:38:09.820]  trust them.
[01:38:09.820 --> 01:38:13.820]  But when what you're doing is meant to make money for them, I wouldn't trust them any
[01:38:13.820 --> 01:38:15.820]  further than I would an attorney.
[01:38:15.820 --> 01:38:22.820]  Money does strange things to people's motivational factors and their willingness to be honest.
[01:38:22.820 --> 01:38:23.820]  Yes, you're right.
[01:38:23.820 --> 01:38:29.820]  Now, the other thing is if you know somebody that actually has a lot of properties that
[01:38:29.820 --> 01:38:34.820]  they manage and do contracts for their properties and all of that, and evictions and things
[01:38:34.820 --> 01:38:44.820]  like that, go to places like these college-style apartment complexes that cater specifically
[01:38:44.820 --> 01:38:45.820]  to college crowds.
[01:38:45.820 --> 01:38:49.820]  Talk to the office managers and everything in there about how the contracts work, how
[01:38:49.820 --> 01:38:51.820]  evictions work, and things like that.
[01:38:51.820 --> 01:38:54.820]  They can point you to the right law for that stuff.
[01:38:54.820 --> 01:38:58.820]  Don't tell them you're in there looking for legal advice or to compete with them.
[01:38:58.820 --> 01:39:04.820]  If you go rent somewhere, you want to understand how this works.
[01:39:04.820 --> 01:39:08.820]  Just get on good terms with them and talk to them about it, because those are the people
[01:39:08.820 --> 01:39:13.820]  that spend a lot of time having to go to court to do these things, and they generally do
[01:39:13.820 --> 01:39:16.820]  it in-house.
[01:39:16.820 --> 01:39:17.820]  Okay.
[01:39:17.820 --> 01:39:20.820]  Now, let me ask you this question.
[01:39:20.820 --> 01:39:23.820]  I do know places like Staples, for example.
[01:39:23.820 --> 01:39:28.820]  In fact, I actually went down to Staples, because I really got a lot of so-called legal
[01:39:28.820 --> 01:39:29.820]  documents.
[01:39:29.820 --> 01:39:33.820]  One of those things I know are inspired by bar attorney magnets that we don't trust,
[01:39:33.820 --> 01:39:36.820]  because they're, you know, whatever.
[01:39:36.820 --> 01:39:46.820]  Anyways, the point being is I did find a series or a packet of real estate contracts and forms
[01:39:46.820 --> 01:39:51.820]  and different things in a packet.
[01:39:51.820 --> 01:39:57.820]  Those things were designed to be modified to your particular situation.
[01:39:57.820 --> 01:39:58.820]  Right.
[01:39:58.820 --> 01:40:00.820]  They're generic templates.
[01:40:00.820 --> 01:40:06.820]  Right, generic templates, but they also had a CD with it telling some of the state laws.
[01:40:06.820 --> 01:40:08.820]  I mean, I don't think it got nowhere near.
[01:40:08.820 --> 01:40:12.820]  I mean, I looked through it, and I don't think it got anywhere close to what state law says
[01:40:12.820 --> 01:40:15.820]  about each relevant case.
[01:40:15.820 --> 01:40:22.820]  Nor is there any assurance that it's the most current of those laws.
[01:40:22.820 --> 01:40:23.820]  I'm sorry.
[01:40:23.820 --> 01:40:24.820]  I missed what you just asked.
[01:40:24.820 --> 01:40:31.820]  I said neither is there any assurance that it is the most current iteration of those
[01:40:31.820 --> 01:40:33.820]  statutes or laws.
[01:40:33.820 --> 01:40:38.820]  You need to look at the publication date on the information, because remember, Texas can
[01:40:38.820 --> 01:40:43.820]  have law coming into effect every 60 days for two years.
[01:40:43.820 --> 01:40:46.820]  Wow, okay.
[01:40:46.820 --> 01:40:48.820]  Okay.
[01:40:48.820 --> 01:40:53.820]  Yeah, see, that's kind of where I was like, it's got to be somewhat close, but I mean,
[01:40:53.820 --> 01:40:59.820]  I just didn't trust it to be 100% close, and I just wanted to get more legitimate, if you
[01:40:59.820 --> 01:41:05.820]  will, information than what I got in some little place that says this is a legal document.
[01:41:05.820 --> 01:41:09.820]  So, but.
[01:41:09.820 --> 01:41:10.820]  All right, Eddie.
[01:41:10.820 --> 01:41:15.820]  Well, hey, I'm going to keep looking at this, and I sure appreciate your help, and I'm going
[01:41:15.820 --> 01:41:19.820]  to get off here, and that's some more pressing questions coming in, and I sure appreciate
[01:41:19.820 --> 01:41:22.820]  it again, and, man, we'll hope to talk to you soon.
[01:41:22.820 --> 01:41:24.820]  All right, JD, thanks for calling in.
[01:41:24.820 --> 01:41:25.820]  Appreciate it.
[01:41:25.820 --> 01:41:26.820]  All right, man.
[01:41:26.820 --> 01:41:27.820]  All right, man.
[01:41:27.820 --> 01:41:28.820]  Bye.
[01:41:28.820 --> 01:41:30.820]  All right, now we're going to go to Jimmy in Maryland.
[01:41:30.820 --> 01:41:32.820]  Jimmy, I've got about two and a half minutes.
[01:41:32.820 --> 01:41:36.820]  I'm going to have to cut you off at two so I can take the break, and then we'll pick you
[01:41:36.820 --> 01:41:37.820]  up if we have to after that.
[01:41:37.820 --> 01:41:39.820]  What do you got?
[01:41:39.820 --> 01:41:40.820]  Okay.
[01:41:40.820 --> 01:41:41.820]  How you doing?
[01:41:41.820 --> 01:41:42.820]  All right.
[01:41:42.820 --> 01:41:43.820]  And you?
[01:41:43.820 --> 01:41:44.820]  Good.
[01:41:44.820 --> 01:41:45.820]  Well, hang in there, Eddie.
[01:41:45.820 --> 01:41:46.820]  Hang in there.
[01:41:46.820 --> 01:41:47.820]  Still fighting the fight.
[01:41:47.820 --> 01:41:54.820]  I called you a few weeks ago, and I told you about a case I had that I found in a U.S.
[01:41:54.820 --> 01:41:55.820]  District Court.
[01:41:55.820 --> 01:42:03.820]  Now, I received an answer back, and it's just a lawyer from the Attorney General Office.
[01:42:03.820 --> 01:42:09.820]  He's a lot of force in this leading statement, and then he's like, he doesn't understand
[01:42:09.820 --> 01:42:10.820]  what's going on.
[01:42:10.820 --> 01:42:11.820]  He claimed that...
[01:42:11.820 --> 01:42:13.820]  Well, Jimmy, you're breaking up.
[01:42:13.820 --> 01:42:14.820]  Back up.
[01:42:14.820 --> 01:42:18.820]  We got, he didn't, he doesn't understand, and that's all I could understand after that.
[01:42:18.820 --> 01:42:19.820]  Okay.
[01:42:19.820 --> 01:42:21.820]  You hear me better now?
[01:42:21.820 --> 01:42:22.820]  Yeah.
[01:42:22.820 --> 01:42:26.820]  Just be real careful with which direction you're talking or moving.
[01:42:26.820 --> 01:42:27.820]  Okay.
[01:42:27.820 --> 01:42:34.820]  He claimed that I did not exhaust all my administrative remedies, and he's also put a lot of force
[01:42:34.820 --> 01:42:36.820]  in leading statements in it.
[01:42:36.820 --> 01:42:38.820]  Now, I did email you.
[01:42:38.820 --> 01:42:39.820]  You probably understand me.
[01:42:39.820 --> 01:42:40.820]  I did email you.
[01:42:40.820 --> 01:42:43.820]  I just took a glance through it and see.
[01:42:43.820 --> 01:42:52.820]  I'm trying to see what things I can bring up when I find my objection to his answer.
[01:42:52.820 --> 01:42:53.820]  Okay.
[01:42:53.820 --> 01:42:58.820]  What email address did you send it to?
[01:42:58.820 --> 01:43:00.820]  Because I don't see anything from you.
[01:43:00.820 --> 01:43:04.820]  When did you send it?
[01:43:04.820 --> 01:43:05.820]  It would also be good.
[01:43:05.820 --> 01:43:06.820]  Yeah.
[01:43:06.820 --> 01:43:07.820]  Well, yesterday.
[01:43:07.820 --> 01:43:10.820]  I sent it to your current lawyer in law.
[01:43:10.820 --> 01:43:11.820]  Okay.
[01:43:11.820 --> 01:43:19.820]  I don't see it, but send me another one, and let me see if I can find it after that.
[01:43:19.820 --> 01:43:20.820]  Okay?
[01:43:20.820 --> 01:43:21.820]  Okay.
[01:43:21.820 --> 01:43:23.820]  I'll do that.
[01:43:23.820 --> 01:43:24.820]  Oh, wait a minute.
[01:43:24.820 --> 01:43:25.820]  No, I got it.
[01:43:25.820 --> 01:43:26.820]  I got it.
[01:43:26.820 --> 01:43:27.820]  Okay.
[01:43:27.820 --> 01:43:28.820]  Jimmy from Maryland.
[01:43:28.820 --> 01:43:29.820]  Okay.
[01:43:29.820 --> 01:43:30.820]  I have it.
[01:43:30.820 --> 01:43:31.820]  Okay.
[01:43:31.820 --> 01:43:32.820]  All right.
[01:43:32.820 --> 01:43:34.820]  I hadn't read it yet, but let me do that when I get a chance.
[01:43:34.820 --> 01:43:38.820]  I can't guarantee it'll be in the next day or two because I still got to get my cars back
[01:43:38.820 --> 01:43:39.820]  and all that stuff.
[01:43:39.820 --> 01:43:41.820]  So, just hang on and let me get to that.
[01:43:41.820 --> 01:43:44.820]  But when we get back on the other side, you can finish with what you got.
[01:43:44.820 --> 01:43:45.820]  Okay?
[01:43:45.820 --> 01:43:46.820]  Okay.
[01:43:46.820 --> 01:43:47.820]  All right.
[01:43:47.820 --> 01:43:48.820]  So, hold on.
[01:43:48.820 --> 01:43:49.820]  All right, folks.
[01:43:49.820 --> 01:43:50.820]  We are coming up on the last segment.
[01:43:50.820 --> 01:43:53.820]  You guys that are on the board, stay on the board.
[01:43:53.820 --> 01:43:59.820]  I will do my best to get to you all if I can, so hang on.
[01:43:59.820 --> 01:44:03.820]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:03.820 --> 01:44:04.820]  Sorry.
[01:44:04.820 --> 01:44:07.820]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.820 --> 01:44:08.820]  What?
[01:44:08.820 --> 01:44:12.820]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:12.820 --> 01:44:15.820]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[01:44:15.820 --> 01:44:18.820]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:18.820 --> 01:44:21.820]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease
[01:44:21.820 --> 01:44:24.820]  is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:24.820 --> 01:44:28.820]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity,
[01:44:28.820 --> 01:44:29.820]  but there is hope.
[01:44:29.820 --> 01:44:31.820]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[01:44:31.820 --> 01:44:35.820]  and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:35.820 --> 01:44:38.820]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[01:44:38.820 --> 01:44:42.820]  and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:42.820 --> 01:44:45.820]  So, if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[01:44:45.820 --> 01:44:49.820]  then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:49.820 --> 01:44:54.820]  or visit them in 1904 Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:54.820 --> 01:44:56.820]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include
[01:44:56.820 --> 01:44:59.820]  discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:44:59.820 --> 01:45:03.820]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.820 --> 01:45:06.820]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:06.820 --> 01:45:10.820]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[01:45:10.820 --> 01:45:14.820]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.820 --> 01:45:18.820]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.820 --> 01:45:22.820]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.820 --> 01:45:27.820]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.820 --> 01:45:30.820]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:45:30.820 --> 01:45:33.820]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.820 --> 01:45:38.820]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:38.820 --> 01:45:42.820]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.820 --> 01:45:46.820]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[01:45:46.820 --> 01:45:51.820]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.820 --> 01:45:55.820]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:55.820 --> 01:46:00.820]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:00.820 --> 01:46:19.820]  If you did not have any problem, where are you going to look for one?
[01:46:19.820 --> 01:46:25.820]  If you could not wait any bit too long, would you purposefully die?
[01:46:25.820 --> 01:46:31.820]  Would you stand around a soldier or warrior on the floor scuffling the keys of peace?
[01:46:31.820 --> 01:46:34.820]  All they're thinking is misunderstanding.
[01:46:34.820 --> 01:46:41.820]  If somebody calls the police, watch the spotlights.
[01:46:41.820 --> 01:46:44.820]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:44.820 --> 01:46:47.820]  All right, Jimmy, I've gone through what you have here.
[01:46:47.820 --> 01:46:50.820]  I did not read the attachment, but I did read your email.
[01:46:50.820 --> 01:46:56.820]  So let me tell you what I believe the issue is going to be, okay?
[01:46:56.820 --> 01:47:01.820]  You did not follow through with the appeals process at the state level.
[01:47:01.820 --> 01:47:07.820]  That's the only way you can challenge the evidentiary issues that you were discussing in this email
[01:47:07.820 --> 01:47:13.820]  with the driving record and all that other stuff that was brought in by the prosecuting attorney
[01:47:13.820 --> 01:47:17.820]  and allowed by the judge even over your hearsay objection.
[01:47:17.820 --> 01:47:25.820]  Without that appeal of that misapplication or introduction of evidence in that way,
[01:47:25.820 --> 01:47:28.820]  the evidence issue is out of hand now.
[01:47:28.820 --> 01:47:34.820]  The only thing that would leave you able to do is challenge original jurisdiction of the court,
[01:47:34.820 --> 01:47:40.820]  which you would have to show why they never had jurisdiction in the first place.
[01:47:40.820 --> 01:47:42.820]  That's where your issues are.
[01:47:42.820 --> 01:47:51.820]  That's why the district court said we can't help you here.
[01:47:51.820 --> 01:47:59.820]  Okay, so my answer should be just focused on subject matter jurisdiction, anything to do with jurisdiction.
[01:47:59.820 --> 01:48:01.820]  As far as at this point, yes.
[01:48:01.820 --> 01:48:07.820]  If you're outside of your time to perfect an appeal, that's going to be your only option,
[01:48:07.820 --> 01:48:17.820]  unless, of course, you can file and get it remanded for a new trial by seeking a new trial from the higher court.
[01:48:17.820 --> 01:48:19.820]  But you're going to have to have a good faith basis,
[01:48:19.820 --> 01:48:24.820]  and you're going to have to show that the evidence that was used to get the conviction was actually inadmissible
[01:48:24.820 --> 01:48:30.820]  and should have been suppressed, and that's all you can do at this point.
[01:48:30.820 --> 01:48:38.820]  It's not right, it's not just, but it is just exactly how the lawyers want it.
[01:48:38.820 --> 01:48:44.820]  Okay, so what you're telling me is even though I went through the public process, through the court of appeals...
[01:48:44.820 --> 01:48:50.820]  Did you go all the way through the courts of appeals, all the way up to the top court in your state?
[01:48:50.820 --> 01:48:51.820]  Yes.
[01:48:51.820 --> 01:48:53.820]  You did?
[01:48:53.820 --> 01:48:57.820]  Yes, and then I went to the U.S. Supreme Court.
[01:48:57.820 --> 01:49:00.820]  Okay, then I'll try to read and see what this AG is saying.
[01:49:00.820 --> 01:49:05.820]  You didn't exhaust your administrative remedies on them, because if you went through all the lower state courts,
[01:49:05.820 --> 01:49:12.820]  you don't have any choice, but why are you going to a U.S. district court instead of the United States Supreme Court?
[01:49:12.820 --> 01:49:22.820]  Your appeals process, once you've hit the highest state court, is the United States Supreme Court, not the federal court.
[01:49:22.820 --> 01:49:31.820]  Well, this is a hazier court that's going to take us to the federal level now.
[01:49:31.820 --> 01:49:33.820]  Okay, all right.
[01:49:33.820 --> 01:49:40.820]  Yeah, and it's contradictory, but the prosecutor's attorney said at my ad valedictive probation hearing,
[01:49:40.820 --> 01:49:47.820]  we claimed that I did exhaust all my remedies, and the judge denied a continuance until, you know...
[01:49:47.820 --> 01:49:52.820]  Do you have the transcript that shows that was the case?
[01:49:52.820 --> 01:49:54.820]  I don't have it, but I can get it.
[01:49:54.820 --> 01:49:55.820]  Well, you're going to need it.
[01:49:55.820 --> 01:49:59.820]  How can they tell you in one breath your administrative remedies are done,
[01:49:59.820 --> 01:50:04.820]  and in the next breath deny you anything because your administrative remedies aren't done?
[01:50:04.820 --> 01:50:07.820]  Okay, so you tell me to get that transcript, and when I get a transcript,
[01:50:07.820 --> 01:50:12.820]  to file a copy of that transcript with my response to the answer.
[01:50:12.820 --> 01:50:23.820]  You're going to ask that district court to review its remanding the case back to you, because that's not right.
[01:50:23.820 --> 01:50:29.820]  If you have already been told your administrative remedies are done, and you go up,
[01:50:29.820 --> 01:50:33.820]  then the federal court, how's it going to say, well, you aren't done?
[01:50:33.820 --> 01:50:38.820]  If the state's telling you, yeah, you are...
[01:50:38.820 --> 01:50:44.820]  That's contradictory.
[01:50:44.820 --> 01:50:50.820]  Yeah, but you need to show them that the state has considered your matter closed for those purposes.
[01:50:50.820 --> 01:50:58.820]  Okay, so I need to get that transcript, and I guess in my answer, and I'll attach that where it has highlighted...
[01:50:58.820 --> 01:51:02.820]  Correct, you're going to have to make reference to page, paragraph, and line, yeah.
[01:51:02.820 --> 01:51:09.820]  Okay, I might have to ask for it, what do you call it, extension of time, because I don't know if I'm going to take it to the transcript,
[01:51:09.820 --> 01:51:12.820]  but I'll get on that right away.
[01:51:12.820 --> 01:51:16.820]  Yeah, I'll get on it right away, and anything else you'd like to say?
[01:51:16.820 --> 01:51:21.820]  When you get a chance, anything else you've got for me, you know, like the gentleman said, I want to hear, I'm still learning.
[01:51:21.820 --> 01:51:26.820]  I've been doing this since 1998, and I still consider myself a student and myself.
[01:51:26.820 --> 01:51:34.820]  Yeah, we all are, the moment we think we know everything, our goose is already cooked.
[01:51:34.820 --> 01:51:38.820]  All right, thanks, I appreciate you, keep it a good fight, and I will be in touch.
[01:51:38.820 --> 01:51:40.820]  All right, Jimmy, you too, thanks.
[01:51:40.820 --> 01:51:44.820]  All right, now we're going to go to M in Texas.
[01:51:44.820 --> 01:51:48.820]  All right, letter M, are you there?
[01:51:48.820 --> 01:51:50.820]  Yes, sir, Eddie, can you hear me?
[01:51:50.820 --> 01:51:52.820]  I can hear you.
[01:51:52.820 --> 01:51:55.820]  All right, thank you for taking my call, first of all.
[01:51:55.820 --> 01:51:57.820]  Sure.
[01:51:57.820 --> 01:52:00.820]  I'm calling on behalf of my sister.
[01:52:00.820 --> 01:52:07.820]  I've been a follower of you for a while, and it's kind of hard to wake people up to take responsibility.
[01:52:07.820 --> 01:52:13.820]  I heard you rephrase it one time, I believe it was a Freedom Welfare recipient.
[01:52:13.820 --> 01:52:14.820]  Exactly.
[01:52:14.820 --> 01:52:19.820]  So I'm calling on behalf of one of those Freedom Welfare recipients.
[01:52:19.820 --> 01:52:21.820]  Okay.
[01:52:21.820 --> 01:52:28.820]  She's a registered nurse, she ran to the mall real quick.
[01:52:28.820 --> 01:52:34.820]  She got down to the nearest establishment right there, dropped off, came back in.
[01:52:34.820 --> 01:52:39.820]  Now she was not working, and I told her that we could fight the argument on the fact that they didn't have a jurisdiction
[01:52:39.820 --> 01:52:41.820]  because she wasn't engaged in commerce.
[01:52:41.820 --> 01:52:48.820]  Although I do have a question, and the question is, since she was on private property being the mall,
[01:52:48.820 --> 01:52:53.820]  does the officer have the jurisdiction to give her a parking citation?
[01:52:53.820 --> 01:53:03.820]  Because the officer was arguing that she was parked in a hydrant zone, when in reality she was just parked in a red zone.
[01:53:03.820 --> 01:53:09.820]  And he got her driver's license when she was walking to the car.
[01:53:09.820 --> 01:53:16.820]  Apparently he stopped when she was going to the car, got mad at her, took her license, gave her the citation,
[01:53:16.820 --> 01:53:28.820]  and then he parked his car there and got down and went into the mall, leaving it in the red zone, kind of adding the insult to the injury.
[01:53:28.820 --> 01:53:37.820]  But generally my question basically was, did he even have the jurisdiction to give the citation since they were on private property?
[01:53:37.820 --> 01:53:41.820]  If you wanted it to be an honest answer, that would be no.
[01:53:41.820 --> 01:53:45.820]  If you want it to be a legal answer, that depends.
[01:53:45.820 --> 01:53:48.820]  Okay.
[01:53:48.820 --> 01:53:50.820]  I understand that.
[01:53:50.820 --> 01:53:54.820]  Now how is the depends on the legal system explained?
[01:53:54.820 --> 01:54:05.820]  The depends on that aspect of it is, one, was this officer operating within his jurisdiction when he wrote the ticket as far as county, city, and so forth?
[01:54:05.820 --> 01:54:18.820]  Is this particular parking spot something that the state regulates in accordance with, you know, the Disability Acts or the Fire Safety Act or anything in that regard?
[01:54:18.820 --> 01:54:29.820]  The fact of the matter is, I personally fail to see how the state or the municipalities can enforce any of those regulations on private property.
[01:54:29.820 --> 01:54:39.820]  The claim that it's publicly accessible, so what? Anybody can drive up in my yard, that doesn't necessarily make it publicly accessible.
[01:54:39.820 --> 01:54:48.820]  And even if I do allow people to come through my yard, that still doesn't make it public property.
[01:54:48.820 --> 01:54:53.820]  But in any case, you're going to lose that argument if you try to make it.
[01:54:53.820 --> 01:54:59.820]  The question is, is what was he using as the authority to issue the citation?
[01:54:59.820 --> 01:55:06.820]  If he was using the transportation code, therein lies his problem.
[01:55:06.820 --> 01:55:07.820]  Correct.
[01:55:07.820 --> 01:55:08.820]  And your benefit.
[01:55:08.820 --> 01:55:13.820]  That's why I believe he demanded to see her driver's license.
[01:55:13.820 --> 01:55:23.820]  Now, she did issue it, but like she said, he became very agitated with her, so basically out of fear of her safety, she just...
[01:55:23.820 --> 01:55:24.820]  That will never fly.
[01:55:24.820 --> 01:55:36.820]  There will never be an issue of coercion that will be recognized by a court if there was any volunteering of the information.
[01:55:36.820 --> 01:55:44.820]  In other words, if he did not forcibly take it, you volunteered it, no matter how much he was threatening you.
[01:55:44.820 --> 01:55:47.820]  Even if she's fined under the citation...
[01:55:47.820 --> 01:55:49.820]  That is correct.
[01:55:49.820 --> 01:55:56.820]  Wow. Okay. Okay. Fair enough. So she basically...
[01:55:56.820 --> 01:56:00.820]  What did they charge her with?
[01:56:00.820 --> 01:56:04.820]  It was blocking a fire hydrant.
[01:56:04.820 --> 01:56:07.820]  Was there a fire hydrant there?
[01:56:07.820 --> 01:56:10.820]  No. It was just a red zone.
[01:56:10.820 --> 01:56:17.820]  Okay. Then I would ask the officer to please produce his evidence of a hydrant.
[01:56:17.820 --> 01:56:18.820]  Get him on the stand.
[01:56:18.820 --> 01:56:21.820]  Officer, did you take pictures of the location?
[01:56:21.820 --> 01:56:22.820]  No.
[01:56:22.820 --> 01:56:30.820]  Officer, can you please show us any diagrams where there is a hydrant present?
[01:56:30.820 --> 01:56:31.820]  No.
[01:56:31.820 --> 01:56:40.820]  Can you show us any part of the water services diagram for the city that shows that a hydrant is installed at this location?
[01:56:40.820 --> 01:56:41.820]  No.
[01:56:41.820 --> 01:56:45.820]  Officer, do you have any evidence at all that a hydrant is there?
[01:56:45.820 --> 01:56:49.820]  No. Just somebody painted the concrete red.
[01:56:49.820 --> 01:56:50.820]  So what does that mean?
[01:56:50.820 --> 01:56:52.820]  It means you can't park there.
[01:56:52.820 --> 01:57:01.820]  Where does it say red is no parking in a way that you can enforce it with the power of the state with a citation?
[01:57:01.820 --> 01:57:03.820]  Because the citation says, I blocked the hydrant.
[01:57:03.820 --> 01:57:07.820]  You're admitting there is no hydrant.
[01:57:07.820 --> 01:57:08.820]  You see?
[01:57:08.820 --> 01:57:12.820]  No. My sister did take pictures of the location where...
[01:57:12.820 --> 01:57:20.820]  Yeah, but in order to get her pictures in, she's either going to have to get the cop to agree that those pictures are of that location,
[01:57:20.820 --> 01:57:27.820]  or she's going to have to take the stand and submit them herself by testifying as to what the pictures are,
[01:57:27.820 --> 01:57:40.820]  at which point the prosecutor gets to cross-examine her and tear up any point she tries to make in relation to that if she doesn't know how to keep her head and keep it intact.
[01:57:40.820 --> 01:57:45.820]  And she does it, so I won't put her on that route.
[01:57:45.820 --> 01:57:46.820]  Okay.
[01:57:46.820 --> 01:57:47.820]  Thanks.
[01:57:47.820 --> 01:57:50.820]  Larry, do me a favor, if you're listening out there, give me a call.
[01:57:50.820 --> 01:57:53.820]  I'm sorry I ran out of time trying to get to you.
[01:57:53.820 --> 01:57:57.820]  Call me back on my cell phone and I'll see what I can do to answer your question.
[01:57:57.820 --> 01:57:59.820]  Em, thanks for calling in.
[01:57:59.820 --> 01:58:01.820]  I appreciate that.
[01:58:01.820 --> 01:58:03.820]  Folks, we are at the end of the show.
[01:58:03.820 --> 01:58:04.820]  All right.
[01:58:04.820 --> 01:58:06.820]  Thanks again for listening.
[01:58:06.820 --> 01:58:09.820]  Thanks for all of the blessings and the financial support.
[01:58:09.820 --> 01:58:19.820]  Please keep the money coming on the issue for helping me fight to get the cars back and to make a literally a federal case out of this so that we all may benefit.
[01:58:19.820 --> 01:58:22.820]  Please keep me in your financial support for that.
[01:58:22.820 --> 01:58:26.820]  All right, folks, this has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Show with your host, Eddie Craig.
[01:58:26.820 --> 01:58:28.820]  Thank you all so much.
[01:58:28.820 --> 01:58:29.820]  Good night.
[01:58:29.820 --> 01:58:49.820]  God bless.
[01:58:49.820 --> 01:59:07.820]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:59:07.820 --> 01:59:10.820]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:10.820 --> 01:59:19.820]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:19.820 --> 01:59:29.820]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.820 --> 01:59:31.820]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:31.820 --> 01:59:40.820]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.820 --> 01:59:51.820]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.820 --> 02:00:01.820]  Looking for some truth? You found it. Logosradionetwork.com.