[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following news flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing you daily
[00:06.000 --> 00:13.000]  bulletins for the commodities market, today in history, news updates, and the inside scoop
[00:13.000 --> 00:21.000]  into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:28.000]  Markets for the 11th of August 2015 opened up with gold at $1,108.78 an ounce, silver
[00:28.000 --> 00:34.000]  at $15.32 an ounce, Texas crude at $44.96 a barrel, and Bitcoin is currently sitting
[00:34.000 --> 00:43.000]  at about $270 U.S. currency.
[00:43.000 --> 00:49.000]  Today in history, Monday, August 11, 2003, a heat wave in Paris, France results in temperatures
[00:49.000 --> 00:55.000]  rising to 112 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving about 144 people dead. These temperatures
[00:55.000 --> 01:01.000]  pale in comparison to the whopping 136 degrees Fahrenheit reached in San Luis Potosi, Mexico
[01:01.000 --> 01:07.000]  on this day in 1933.
[01:07.000 --> 01:13.000]  In recent news, Verizon Wireless says that it has successfully tested its new technology,
[01:13.000 --> 01:19.000]  the Next Generation Passive Optical Network, or NGPON2, which delivers broadband speeds
[01:19.000 --> 01:25.000]  of up to 10 gigabytes per second. That's 10 times faster than the speeds of Google Fiber,
[01:25.000 --> 01:29.000]  pretty fast considering that Google is already 100 times faster than the average broadband
[01:29.000 --> 01:34.000]  connection. The company says that by simply adding new colors of light onto the existing
[01:34.000 --> 01:40.000]  fiber network, it could possibly boost speeds as lightning fast as 40 to 80 gigabytes per
[01:40.000 --> 01:46.000]  second.
[01:46.000 --> 01:52.000]  Talk about a shotgun wedding. Jostin Bundy, 21, pleaded guilty on July 2 to assault with
[01:52.000 --> 01:56.000]  bodily injury from a fistfight that he got into with the former boyfriend of his girlfriend,
[01:56.000 --> 02:01.000]  Elizabeth Jaynes, back in February. Smith County Judge Randall Rogers gave him the choice
[02:01.000 --> 02:07.000]  between either two years of probation or 15 days in jail. What's the catch? Well, apparently,
[02:07.000 --> 02:12.000]  the probation terms included requiring Bundy to write out Proverbs 26, 27, if a man digs
[02:12.000 --> 02:17.000]  a pit, he will fall into it 25 times a day. And get this, probation terms include getting
[02:17.000 --> 02:22.000]  married within 30 days. The couple had their state-mandated wedding at City Hall on July
[02:22.000 --> 02:28.000]  20.
[02:28.000 --> 02:32.000]  The CryptoShow.com is hosting a free Ross Appeal fundraiser. Ross Olbert was sentenced
[02:32.000 --> 02:37.000]  to life in prison for his alleged role in the dark web Silk Road online platform. Many
[02:37.000 --> 02:41.000]  great items will be auctioned off for Ross's legal appeal. The event is scheduled for the
[02:41.000 --> 02:46.000]  15th of August, 6 to 10 p.m. at the Brave New Bookstore off of Guadalupe and Martin Luther
[02:46.000 --> 02:55.000]  King in Austin, Texas. For more information, please visit TheCryptoShow.com.
[02:55.000 --> 03:12.000]  This has been your Lowdown for August 11, 2013.
[03:12.000 --> 03:38.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, you have our radio. I call it number 512-646-1984. We
[03:38.000 --> 03:45.000]  do have four people on the board, and all the board will hold at this time is four people.
[03:45.000 --> 03:53.000]  So, if you have a comment or a question, when I finish with one caller, it will open up
[03:53.000 --> 03:59.000]  that line. So, when the caller I'm talking to hangs up, it frees up a space and then
[03:59.000 --> 04:06.000]  someone else can call in. So, that's so you don't keep calling and you don't get through.
[04:06.000 --> 04:19.000]  Okay, Craig, give me that information and I'll help you file a rescission of the note.
[04:19.000 --> 04:26.000]  The technical term for what will happen when you do that is it will jerk a knot in their
[04:26.000 --> 04:39.000]  high knee. And I want to keep the house. So, even though I'm going to file a rescission
[04:39.000 --> 04:44.000]  of the note, it will definitely help me to keep the home as well.
[04:44.000 --> 04:52.000]  Okay, this is the one I just gave this to the lawyer today. I put together the quiet
[04:52.000 --> 05:02.000]  title action, complete, and sent it to the lawyers with a cover letter. And I said, look,
[05:02.000 --> 05:08.000]  we rescinded the note and you didn't respond within the statutory time limit. Therefore,
[05:08.000 --> 05:18.000]  according to the Truth in Lending Act, I get to keep the property without obligation.
[05:18.000 --> 05:19.000]  Okay.
[05:19.000 --> 05:27.000]  However, I am not naive enough to think that when you raise this issue in court, that the
[05:27.000 --> 05:35.000]  judge is going to rule in your favor. I expect that. But if we do this this way, if I file
[05:35.000 --> 05:41.000]  this quiet title, there's a chance I could win but a small chance. There's a chance you
[05:41.000 --> 05:47.000]  could lose but a small chance. But one thing is for certain, it will cost a whole lot of
[05:47.000 --> 05:56.000]  money and in the end, the only one who will benefit from this transaction are the lawyers.
[05:56.000 --> 06:04.000]  So, tell you what, let's talk. In a rescission, the note is nullified and so is the deed of
[06:04.000 --> 06:13.000]  trust. I can't undo it once I have rescinded. It's a done deal. There are two things we
[06:13.000 --> 06:20.000]  can do. You can tender me back to me everything that was paid to you and I will tender the
[06:20.000 --> 06:28.000]  property back to you. However, I have a claim against you in excess of the value of the
[06:28.000 --> 06:37.000]  property, so I'll offer tender by set off against the claim that I owe you. Or let's
[06:37.000 --> 06:50.000]  just make a deal. Give me an amount to cure the default and I will cure the default and
[06:50.000 --> 06:56.000]  either refinance or sell the property or something. But first thing you have to do is take all
[06:56.000 --> 07:05.000]  the marks off my credit and rehabilitate my credit. And then give me a lower default cure
[07:05.000 --> 07:14.000]  amount that reflects a portion of what you would have to spend in attorney fees. Sure.
[07:14.000 --> 07:22.000]  And then let's all go home. Spent five or six years helping people fight the banks and
[07:22.000 --> 07:28.000]  it took that long to realize fighting the banks was a bad strategy. Negotiating with
[07:28.000 --> 07:35.000]  the banks is a much better strategy. You can actually win this one. Okay, send me that
[07:35.000 --> 07:42.000]  information and I'll get you more information about how a rescind works. I do need to move
[07:42.000 --> 07:47.000]  along. I've got a whole stack of callers and they're really patient. I just sent that
[07:47.000 --> 07:52.000]  information to Mr. Jeff. So you shouldn't be getting it through email. If not, I'll
[07:52.000 --> 07:58.000]  do it again, but instead it went through. Okay, wonderful. Okay, keep us up to date
[07:58.000 --> 08:06.000]  on what happens. Absolutely. And I'm looking forward to hearing from you and Jeff for sure.
[08:06.000 --> 08:12.000]  Okay, thank you. Now we're going to go to Clint in Texas. And Clint, you had a comment
[08:12.000 --> 08:23.000]  on the Lesbians. Yes, that's correct, Randy. First off, let me say this is a wonderful
[08:23.000 --> 08:30.000]  show that does justice to the afflicted needy. And may Jesus Christ bless his soul to labor
[08:30.000 --> 08:38.000]  and give to make this radio show. So I'm calling in this evening concerning intensive
[08:38.000 --> 08:45.000]  court in the federal realm. This matter is critical to a man who is possibly facing six
[08:45.000 --> 08:51.000]  years in federal prison for volunteering his legal services to the Christian ministry and
[08:51.000 --> 09:00.000]  was found guilty in March in Florida. Knowing letters or a letter, I'm not really sure
[09:00.000 --> 09:08.000]  exactly all what his actions were as far as the letters, but they did not result in any
[09:08.000 --> 09:22.000]  harm to any entities. Go ahead. Let me demonstrate why I was so concerned earlier. So I have
[09:22.000 --> 09:36.000]  up the statute for Lesbians and Florida statutes 48.23. And it says a notice of Lesbians must
[09:36.000 --> 09:44.000]  contain the following. The name of the parties, the date of the institution of the action,
[09:44.000 --> 09:54.000]  the date of the clerk's electronic receipt of the case of the number of the action, the
[09:54.000 --> 10:01.000]  name of the court in which it is pending, a description of the property involved to
[10:01.000 --> 10:08.000]  be affected, a statement of the relief sought to the property in the case of the notice
[10:08.000 --> 10:21.000]  it goes on. You see my problem. There was no case. And this concerns me greatly because
[10:21.000 --> 10:30.000]  we have a lot of people out there preaching Patriot mythology and we have a lot of very
[10:30.000 --> 10:41.000]  well-meaning legal researchers who have an issue. My issue was I spent the night in jail
[10:41.000 --> 10:48.000]  for driving the headlight out. So I got to looking into the criminal laws. The problem
[10:48.000 --> 11:00.000]  was is that my legal education as I researched this had large gaps in it. And the things
[11:00.000 --> 11:10.000]  we talk about on this show, they've been relatively carefully crafted over the last seven or eight
[11:10.000 --> 11:19.000]  years or so so as to give you the basics that will keep you out of trouble. Had he read
[11:19.000 --> 11:28.000]  this statute before he filed the Lesbians, he would not be in this position. And I know
[11:28.000 --> 11:32.000]  it sounds horrible, but I don't know how to fix that.
[11:32.000 --> 11:38.000]  Well, there are things that I'm actually just curious concerning some of these fixes. I
[11:38.000 --> 11:43.000]  think most people would agree that filing a letter and being sentenced to six years
[11:43.000 --> 11:50.000]  is severe to say the least while pedophiles and all these other people get four years,
[11:50.000 --> 11:56.000]  three years. So something's definitely upside down on the penalty if he is that his actions
[11:56.000 --> 12:02.000]  were even guilty. I haven't determined myself, but Randy, this call is about what can be
[12:02.000 --> 12:13.000]  done to help him not be thrown in prison for six years for a notice, a Lesbians stating
[12:13.000 --> 12:21.000]  it did not block the sale of the property. All it did was a buyer to where this property
[12:21.000 --> 12:27.000]  is in litigation. That's all the Lesbians, to my knowledge, does.
[12:27.000 --> 12:34.000]  Okay. I keep going back to the same things in order to find a way to help him. We need
[12:34.000 --> 12:41.000]  to find how the courts have misconstrued or misapplied the law.
[12:41.000 --> 12:43.000]  Yes. So concerning that...
[12:43.000 --> 12:52.000]  Okay. I can read here what constitutes a Lespendence. But what I don't see here is
[12:52.000 --> 13:01.000]  anything that references filing a Lespendence that does not meet these requirements. I don't
[13:01.000 --> 13:03.000]  see a remedy here.
[13:03.000 --> 13:08.000]  A Lespendence. There's other issues besides the Lespendence. One of those issues is I'd
[13:08.000 --> 13:18.000]  like to seek your opinion on. It's concerning that he was charged with two counts of criminal
[13:18.000 --> 13:26.000]  contempt. So I will briefly explain the situation, but bear in mind, my only question is whether
[13:26.000 --> 13:36.000]  one subsection governs another subsection. Paul Hanson is supposedly charged under subsection
[13:36.000 --> 13:48.000]  401. That's Title 18 of the United States Code, Part 1, Chapter 21, Contents, subsection
[13:48.000 --> 13:56.000]  401, Item 3. And he's been convicted on two counts of criminal contempt. One count is
[13:56.000 --> 14:06.000]  not that charged. However, subsection 401 is very simplistic and only contains one sentence.
[14:06.000 --> 14:12.000]  And that's the best of my knowledge, that's what he's been charged under.
[14:12.000 --> 14:13.000]  Okay.
[14:13.000 --> 14:14.000]  Subsection 401.
[14:14.000 --> 14:19.000]  Okay. Has he been charged in the state of the federal court?
[14:19.000 --> 14:20.000]  Yes.
[14:20.000 --> 14:28.000]  Okay. What constitutes criminal contempt in the Fed?
[14:28.000 --> 14:36.000]  This is the issue that drives you to the heart of my question. There appears to be two subsections
[14:36.000 --> 14:43.000]  that deal with what constitutes criminal contempt. One of them is subsection 401, like I said,
[14:43.000 --> 14:49.000]  is very simplistic and it only contains one sentence. So when reading subsection 401,
[14:49.000 --> 14:54.000]  I'm wondering myself, where is the statutory language regulating the terms, conditions
[14:54.000 --> 14:59.000]  and penalties for violating that subsection? But it's not there. It's very, very simple,
[14:59.000 --> 15:02.000]  like I said, one sentence.
[15:02.000 --> 15:09.000]  The problem with contempt is punishment is pretty well left to the discretion of the
[15:09.000 --> 15:13.000]  court. That's probably why it's not defined.
[15:13.000 --> 15:19.000]  You can't have a penalty that's open for anything, for any discretion. It would seem
[15:19.000 --> 15:23.000]  like it would be common sense that every penalty of the judge would be relegated to something.
[15:23.000 --> 15:27.000]  It can't be 99 years for criminal contempt.
[15:27.000 --> 15:36.000]  Yeah. It's not in the statute. You'll find it in the case law.
[15:36.000 --> 15:37.000]  Okay.
[15:37.000 --> 15:44.000]  But, okay, it seems like the question that's being raised here is how do we mitigate the
[15:44.000 --> 15:55.000]  punishment when clearly we haven't got to the punishment yet? He's had an initial hearing,
[15:55.000 --> 16:03.000]  but he gets to appeal. And let me give you my take on how the feds do this kind of thing.
[16:03.000 --> 16:12.000]  And I've seen this a lot. You may beat the time, but you won't be too right. Even if
[16:12.000 --> 16:20.000]  they convict him, they're likely to give him time served. They don't want this guy clogging
[16:20.000 --> 16:27.000]  up their prison system. They just don't want him messing with them again.
[16:27.000 --> 16:33.000]  There's two points. Let me tell you about real quick. One is the judge, Margaret Casey
[16:33.000 --> 16:39.000]  Rogers in Florida, the federal judge, she has a record of being anti-Christian. In the
[16:39.000 --> 16:47.000]  past, she ruled that I think praying prayers in school was not allowed, and that was actually
[16:47.000 --> 16:54.000]  overturned. The second thing, that's point number one, is who the judge is in this matter.
[16:54.000 --> 17:00.000]  That judge also is on the record for saying.
[17:00.000 --> 17:05.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[17:05.000 --> 17:10.000]  of nutrition. People feed their pets better than they feed themselves, and it's time we
[17:10.000 --> 17:16.000]  changed all that. Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment
[17:16.000 --> 17:21.000]  is good nutrition. In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated,
[17:21.000 --> 17:27.000]  and mutilated, Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need. Logos Radio Network gets
[17:27.000 --> 17:32.000]  many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject. We have come to trust
[17:32.000 --> 17:38.000]  Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs,
[17:38.000 --> 17:45.000]  and many others. When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you
[17:45.000 --> 17:51.000]  help support Quality Radio. As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want
[17:51.000 --> 17:57.000]  to join us. As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family,
[17:57.000 --> 18:00.000]  and increase your income. Order now.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:10.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method. Michael Mears has won
[18:10.000 --> 18:15.000]  six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win too. You'll get step-by-step
[18:15.000 --> 18:20.000]  instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes,
[18:20.000 --> 18:25.000]  what to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons, how to answer letters and
[18:25.000 --> 18:30.000]  phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit reports, how to turn the financial
[18:30.000 --> 18:36.000]  tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The Michael Mears proven method is the
[18:36.000 --> 18:41.000]  solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:47.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[18:47.000 --> 18:56.000]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s
[18:56.000 --> 19:01.000]  at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:01.000 --> 19:11.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[19:11.000 --> 19:17.000]  Well, don't let them get to you. Only the father can deliver you.
[19:17.000 --> 19:23.000]  So don't let bad-minded people hurt you. And tell states to get behind you.
[19:23.000 --> 19:40.000]  You know what I mean? My friend, Nala Jackson. Come on.
[19:40.000 --> 19:47.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio. Sorry, Clint, generally I hear the bumper music,
[19:47.000 --> 19:53.000]  but tonight I'm not hearing the bumper music. I keep falling off. I'm sorry, I'm not talking to you.
[19:53.000 --> 19:56.000]  Yeah, okay, right. I'm a clip. Okay.
[19:56.000 --> 20:02.000]  So as I was saying, this judge, Margaret Casey Rogers in Florida, in the federal court there in Florida,
[20:02.000 --> 20:08.000]  can't remember the name of the town, but it's the west, west Florida.
[20:08.000 --> 20:12.000]  She's on the record for stating that Kent Holden is worse than a racist.
[20:12.000 --> 20:17.000]  Now, Kent Holden's crime, to the best of my knowledge, is financial structuring.
[20:17.000 --> 20:20.000]  I don't know all the ins and outs because I don't have access to his record.
[20:20.000 --> 20:26.000]  Actually, there is, now that I think about it, his records are posted on 2peter3.com.
[20:26.000 --> 20:28.000]  So any of the listeners can go and check that out.
[20:28.000 --> 20:35.000]  But the gist of it, he's charged on financial terms, and she says he's worse than a racist.
[20:35.000 --> 20:42.000]  Now, not just that, somehow that statement that she made was removed from the court record.
[20:42.000 --> 20:48.000]  This was in his first trial back in 2005, I believe.
[20:48.000 --> 20:54.000]  Did you ask the judge to recuse herself? Or did he?
[20:54.000 --> 21:03.000]  Yes. And she was also the same judge who went into the recent trial in March.
[21:03.000 --> 21:10.000]  So they're given, whoever's allotting what judge picks what case,
[21:10.000 --> 21:16.000]  it would seem to have her as the pit bull against Kent Holden.
[21:16.000 --> 21:23.000]  So he's not your pit bull judge. He was, you know, unbiased.
[21:23.000 --> 21:29.000]  And then my second point concerning, you know, the federal system trying not to get people
[21:29.000 --> 21:33.000]  severe time clogging their system up, I think it's just the opposite.
[21:33.000 --> 21:39.000]  I think we have a federal, we have a prison industrial complex where they make the judges,
[21:39.000 --> 21:48.000]  a lot of the judges have financial stock and benefit from having the private prisons filled with inmates.
[21:48.000 --> 21:53.000]  Well, you know, I've heard these accusations before.
[21:53.000 --> 22:04.000]  And it may be true, but it doesn't help us fix the issue we have before us.
[22:04.000 --> 22:12.000]  And, you know, I'm concerned about this guy's liberty. I have been where he is.
[22:12.000 --> 22:16.000]  I fully understand his position.
[22:16.000 --> 22:24.000]  I've been in jail, I was sentenced to a year in jail for filing criminal complaints with a grand jury
[22:24.000 --> 22:28.000]  against the judge who sentenced, who prosecuted me.
[22:28.000 --> 22:33.000]  So I fully understand his position.
[22:33.000 --> 22:45.000]  But if we're going to help him, we have to be careful about our own personal passions and individual issues.
[22:45.000 --> 22:55.000]  And I understand that you're a Christian and I'm going to say something you're not going to want to hear.
[22:55.000 --> 23:03.000]  Do not bring religion in the door of the court.
[23:03.000 --> 23:10.000]  It will not help Hanson gain his liberty.
[23:10.000 --> 23:15.000]  When to run to Caesar, when we come into court, you cannot bring, you know,
[23:15.000 --> 23:19.000]  we have a lot of guys who want to bring God's law into court.
[23:19.000 --> 23:25.000]  No, guys, you can't do that. Even God told you not to do that.
[23:25.000 --> 23:29.000]  Stay with, bring to Caesar his law.
[23:29.000 --> 23:34.000]  Outside the court, you operate from God's law.
[23:34.000 --> 23:43.000]  And yes, our law is essentially based on God's law, but it was implemented by a bunch of politicians.
[23:43.000 --> 23:45.000]  So therein lies the conundrum.
[23:45.000 --> 23:49.000]  But let's do our homework.
[23:49.000 --> 23:54.000]  What constitutes criminal contempt?
[23:54.000 --> 23:56.000]  What are the elements?
[23:56.000 --> 24:00.000]  What does it take to prove a criminal contempt?
[24:00.000 --> 24:11.000]  One of the things everybody who's trying to help him should read is the pattern jury charge in the Fed for criminal contempt.
[24:11.000 --> 24:19.000]  And then you look to see if he has met all of the requirements for criminal contempt.
[24:19.000 --> 24:28.000]  When I get someone who's looking at going to jail, I get very, very careful.
[24:28.000 --> 24:34.000]  I back up and take whatever is important to me and set it aside.
[24:34.000 --> 24:42.000]  You know, my whole purpose is to show people how to take on the system
[24:42.000 --> 24:45.000]  and how to force public officials to do what they're supposed to do.
[24:45.000 --> 24:56.000]  But I would never, ever allow that to interfere with trying to keep somebody out of jail.
[24:56.000 --> 25:01.000]  You know, we do the show Legal Reform and we all hate lawyers.
[25:01.000 --> 25:04.000]  We know they're absolutely and totally corrupt.
[25:04.000 --> 25:17.000]  But if you're being forced into a prosecutorial situation, you need a lawyer.
[25:17.000 --> 25:18.000]  Don't trust the lawyer.
[25:18.000 --> 25:23.000]  We'll show you how to handle the lawyer, but you need one.
[25:23.000 --> 25:27.000]  Does he have a lawyer?
[25:27.000 --> 25:33.000]  He himself is acting as of himself.
[25:33.000 --> 25:44.000]  My suggestion to you is you go to him and tell him, you get a lawyer.
[25:44.000 --> 25:49.000]  Did you hear me talking about the four-sided chess board earlier?
[25:49.000 --> 25:54.000]  No, I actually caught about the last five minutes of your conversation.
[25:54.000 --> 25:55.000]  Okay.
[25:55.000 --> 26:01.000]  During the court, it's like playing four-sided chess.
[26:01.000 --> 26:08.000]  Everything in four-sided chess or three- or four-sided is about relationships.
[26:08.000 --> 26:15.000]  If you have four-sided chess, you will have all of these parties develop relationships.
[26:15.000 --> 26:22.000]  The only way you're going to win is to group up with somebody else and gang up on one of the weaker ones.
[26:22.000 --> 26:26.000]  You can think of a court case as a four-sided chess board.
[26:26.000 --> 26:28.000]  You're sitting in one side.
[26:28.000 --> 26:31.000]  Your lawyer is to your right.
[26:31.000 --> 26:33.000]  Opposing counsel is to your left.
[26:33.000 --> 26:36.000]  The judge is across from you.
[26:36.000 --> 26:39.000]  You have a relationship with your lawyer.
[26:39.000 --> 26:45.000]  He has a relationship with opposing counsel and with the judge.
[26:45.000 --> 26:49.000]  In this case, get a lawyer.
[26:49.000 --> 26:52.000]  If he gets a lawyer, very good chance.
[26:52.000 --> 27:01.000]  The court will read that as this guy who's been one of these obnoxious,
[27:01.000 --> 27:13.000]  reactionary, subversive, paramilitary, blow up the government heathens has seen the light
[27:13.000 --> 27:18.000]  and give us someone we can work with.
[27:18.000 --> 27:22.000]  First and foremost is his liberty.
[27:22.000 --> 27:28.000]  Let's get his liberty handled, and then if we have other issues, we can take those on.
[27:28.000 --> 27:34.000]  But I'm a combat veteran and I understand his position.
[27:34.000 --> 27:41.000]  When you go into combat, you have to pick your battles very, very carefully
[27:41.000 --> 27:45.000]  because if you don't, you might not get a second chance.
[27:45.000 --> 27:50.000]  You should always have an exit strategy.
[27:50.000 --> 27:55.000]  Hanson needed an exit strategy.
[27:55.000 --> 28:05.000]  And you should never allow anger or frustration to enter into your calculations.
[28:05.000 --> 28:10.000]  A lot of the problems we have when someone fights a case like this
[28:10.000 --> 28:17.000]  is they get rulings against them and they feel betrayed.
[28:17.000 --> 28:19.000]  And I'm a Vietnam vet.
[28:19.000 --> 28:25.000]  I understand betrayal and how devastating that can be to someone.
[28:25.000 --> 28:32.000]  And if they're not careful, the issue becomes about the fight, not about the outcome.
[28:32.000 --> 28:45.000]  We all need to decide what is our ultimate intended outcome as concerns Mr. Hanson.
[28:45.000 --> 28:52.000]  So my question to you is, what is, if you were actually involved,
[28:52.000 --> 29:01.000]  what would be your intended outcome as concerns, Mr. Hanson?
[29:01.000 --> 29:06.000]  If I were involved, what would be my intended outcome?
[29:06.000 --> 29:12.000]  The ultimate outcome, what would you like to achieve at the end of the day?
[29:12.000 --> 29:16.000]  Well, those who are guilty of doing the wrong thing should be,
[29:16.000 --> 29:19.000]  justice should come to those people.
[29:19.000 --> 29:21.000]  No, no, no.
[29:21.000 --> 29:23.000]  An outcome can't be vague.
[29:23.000 --> 29:26.000]  It needs to be specific.
[29:26.000 --> 29:31.000]  Go back to where?
[29:31.000 --> 29:36.000]  If you want something, what do you want?
[29:36.000 --> 29:40.000]  Define it, align it, specify it.
[29:40.000 --> 29:47.000]  Decide specifically what you want, then ask for it,
[29:47.000 --> 29:55.000]  then accept on faith that what you ask for will manifest itself.
[29:55.000 --> 30:03.000]  Now, that sounds a lot like the Harvard School of Business.
[30:03.000 --> 30:07.000]  Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the tallest of them all?
[30:07.000 --> 30:10.000]  If you answered Americans, you just came up short.
[30:10.000 --> 30:12.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and in a moment,
[30:12.000 --> 30:16.000]  I'll tell you which country has the tallest population in the world.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:18.000 --> 30:22.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:27.000 --> 30:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:32.000 --> 30:35.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:35.000 --> 30:38.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[30:38.000 --> 30:42.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:42.000 --> 30:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:46.000 --> 30:48.000]  When you think tall, you probably think America.
[30:48.000 --> 30:52.000]  Tall buildings, tall athletes, tall reputation, right?
[30:52.000 --> 30:56.000]  But to find the world's tallest people, you actually have to look to tiny Holland.
[30:56.000 --> 30:57.000]  That's right.
[30:57.000 --> 31:01.000]  The Dutch aren't just taller than Americans, they tower over us.
[31:01.000 --> 31:05.000]  The average Dutch man is six foot one, followed by the Danish at six feet.
[31:05.000 --> 31:08.000]  Americans measure up at just five foot ten.
[31:08.000 --> 31:10.000]  So what is Holland doing right?
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  Well, first, the Netherlands has one of the world's healthiest diets,
[31:13.000 --> 31:18.000]  particularly at the stages of life that matter most, prenatal and early childhood.
[31:18.000 --> 31:22.000]  Equally important, people of all income groups practice healthy habits.
[31:22.000 --> 31:24.000]  Isn't it time we did the same here?
[31:24.000 --> 31:32.000]  This is Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[31:32.000 --> 31:35.000]  Did you know there are three million edible food plants on earth
[31:35.000 --> 31:38.000]  and none have the nutritional value of the hemp plant?
[31:38.000 --> 31:41.000]  HempUSA.org offers you hemp protein powder.
[31:41.000 --> 31:46.000]  It does not contain chemicals or THC, is non-GMO, and is 100% gluten free.
[31:46.000 --> 31:50.000]  Hemp protein powder burns fat, builds muscle, contains 53% protein,
[31:50.000 --> 31:55.000]  and feeds the body the nutrients it needs. Call 888-910-4367
[31:55.000 --> 32:02.000]  and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you, only at HempUSA.org.
[32:02.000 --> 32:06.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:06.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[32:08.000 --> 32:10.000]  and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.000 --> 32:18.000]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:18.000 --> 32:20.000]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:23.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity
[32:23.000 --> 32:26.000]  to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:32.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:32.000 --> 32:34.000]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:38.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:38.000 --> 32:41.000]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:43.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:43.000 --> 32:46.000]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:46.000 --> 32:48.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:48.000 --> 32:51.000]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:20.000]  Order your copy today and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:20.000 --> 33:38.000]  Okay, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio,
[33:38.000 --> 33:40.000]  and I apologize to everybody for running off the cliff.
[33:40.000 --> 33:46.000]  I'm supposed to get bumper music, but I'm not hearing the bumper music.
[33:46.000 --> 33:51.000]  What I'm talking about here is how to be very effective.
[33:51.000 --> 34:03.000]  And the mind is very effective when it has a pinpoint focused ultimate outcome.
[34:03.000 --> 34:10.000]  And for me, for Hanson, it would be very easy for me to develop what my ultimate outcome is.
[34:10.000 --> 34:14.000]  Always liberty is first.
[34:14.000 --> 34:19.000]  If somebody's been charged with a crime, the prosecutor's trying to get them to take a deal,
[34:19.000 --> 34:23.000]  and they feel like the deal is horrible and awful and it's wrongful,
[34:23.000 --> 34:29.000]  they shouldn't be doing this, this is all illegal, take the deal.
[34:29.000 --> 34:33.000]  If the deal keeps you out of jail, take the deal.
[34:33.000 --> 34:38.000]  Once you've taken the deal and you've got them to stop coming after you for trying to put you in prison,
[34:38.000 --> 34:42.000]  now you can go back and fight them all you want to.
[34:42.000 --> 34:45.000]  First, preserve your liberty.
[34:45.000 --> 34:51.000]  And Clint, that's kind of where I was going when I'm asking,
[34:51.000 --> 34:56.000]  what do you want to achieve for Clint?
[34:56.000 --> 35:01.000]  Clint, what do you want to achieve for Mr. Hanson?
[35:01.000 --> 35:07.000]  And once you have defined what you want to achieve for Mr. Hanson,
[35:07.000 --> 35:19.000]  then you take everything that you decide or think that would be a good idea to you as helpful for him,
[35:19.000 --> 35:28.000]  and then ask yourself, how will this lead Mr. Hanson toward his freedom?
[35:28.000 --> 35:35.000]  Well, what I'm about to do, lead him to a better outcome, and how will it do that?
[35:35.000 --> 35:42.000]  If you can't answer that question, whatever you're contemplating doing, don't do it.
[35:42.000 --> 35:44.000]  Don't do it because you're angry.
[35:44.000 --> 35:48.000]  Don't do it because you think what you're doing is right.
[35:48.000 --> 35:54.000]  In a law that's not relevant, outcomes are the only thing that are relevant.
[35:54.000 --> 36:01.000]  Truth is a necessity, not because it's moral, but because in court,
[36:01.000 --> 36:05.000]  anything other than the truth will come back to bite you big time.
[36:05.000 --> 36:15.000]  So I suggest let's look at what's going on here, and stop being so steeped in the law,
[36:15.000 --> 36:21.000]  and let's look at the politics of the human beings involved.
[36:21.000 --> 36:28.000]  I have no evidence that the courts are actively involved in incarcerating people
[36:28.000 --> 36:37.000]  to serve the jail network, the private prison network.
[36:37.000 --> 36:42.000]  I don't even think the feds use private prisons.
[36:42.000 --> 36:48.000]  So even if they are, what could we do?
[36:48.000 --> 36:50.000]  What could you do?
[36:50.000 --> 37:00.000]  What could Mr. Hanson do that would most likely preserve his liberty?
[37:00.000 --> 37:03.000]  Well, first off, I'm not angry.
[37:03.000 --> 37:11.000]  I don't have any plans of doing anything.
[37:11.000 --> 37:15.000]  As you stated before, the lawyers are controlled by the courts.
[37:15.000 --> 37:20.000]  I speak passionately, and you may be confusing that with anger, but I speak clearly.
[37:20.000 --> 37:22.000]  I'm not angry.
[37:22.000 --> 37:23.000]  Okay.
[37:23.000 --> 37:26.000]  You said before that the courts have control over the attorneys,
[37:26.000 --> 37:30.000]  and if your life is at stake, why would you give your...
[37:30.000 --> 37:35.000]  If I had a choice, which usually you don't, you usually have to fight for it.
[37:35.000 --> 37:39.000]  If you want to, quote, represent yourself, even though you are yourself,
[37:39.000 --> 37:46.000]  it's usually like pulling teeth to get the judge to consent to allow you to say things for yourself.
[37:46.000 --> 37:48.000]  Exactly.
[37:48.000 --> 37:51.000]  If my life was online, I would not entrust it to another man.
[37:51.000 --> 37:54.000]  No one's going to care more about my life than myself.
[37:54.000 --> 38:00.000]  And that's a fundamental right now when it comes to whether God is a part of all this.
[38:00.000 --> 38:04.000]  God is intricately a part of a republic.
[38:04.000 --> 38:09.000]  If my rights are given to me by God, if they're not given to me by God,
[38:09.000 --> 38:14.000]  God does not exist, then there's no one there to give me those rights.
[38:14.000 --> 38:17.000]  Okay, that's a whole other issue.
[38:17.000 --> 38:21.000]  We're in a court of law.
[38:21.000 --> 38:26.000]  God didn't make these laws, man did.
[38:26.000 --> 38:33.000]  God gave us the ability and the right to make these laws.
[38:33.000 --> 38:40.000]  And if we introduce these moral judgments, we'll condemn him to prison.
[38:40.000 --> 38:43.000]  It may not be right.
[38:43.000 --> 38:48.000]  Maybe it shouldn't be that way, but that's what will happen.
[38:48.000 --> 39:00.000]  So until we clear his liberty, we need to be real focused on what our intended outcome is.
[39:00.000 --> 39:09.000]  And there's nothing in this that would in any way conflict with anything that's in the Bible.
[39:09.000 --> 39:12.000]  Well, the focus is clear.
[39:12.000 --> 39:15.000]  The courts are totally corrupt, as you stated.
[39:15.000 --> 39:16.000]  Yes.
[39:16.000 --> 39:18.000]  It turns out they will sell you out.
[39:18.000 --> 39:20.000]  Now, the focus is this.
[39:20.000 --> 39:28.000]  Create politics because perception is everything, and everything is political, and everything is negotiable.
[39:28.000 --> 39:34.000]  Create the atmosphere of politics, shine the light, and make the noise.
[39:34.000 --> 39:36.000]  That is the focus.
[39:36.000 --> 39:47.000]  Where I was going was we get him a lawyer, and then we show him how to take control of his lawyer.
[39:47.000 --> 39:50.000]  Yeah, the courts are corrupt.
[39:50.000 --> 39:58.000]  But the problem is, is you have powers and abilities far beyond those of a mortal lawyer.
[39:58.000 --> 40:03.000]  The lawyer has political concerns.
[40:03.000 --> 40:06.000]  You can end his career.
[40:06.000 --> 40:14.000]  A couple of well-paid placed bar grievances, they'll cancel his malpractice insurance, and he is screwed.
[40:14.000 --> 40:21.000]  Even if they don't cancel, they'll increase the premium so high he can't afford to pay him.
[40:21.000 --> 40:34.000]  So while the lawyers are afraid of the courts, they're even more afraid of a litigant, a client that they can't control.
[40:34.000 --> 40:45.000]  My last case was thrown out by the judge specifically to protect my lawyer from me.
[40:45.000 --> 40:53.000]  If he takes on a lawyer, then he can start taking steps to give the lawyer plausible deniability
[40:53.000 --> 41:02.000]  so that the lawyer can go in and adjudicate issues that the courts aren't letting Mr. Hanson litigate.
[41:02.000 --> 41:07.000]  It's just more than one way of going about this.
[41:07.000 --> 41:13.000]  My perception is, and I can't recall any specific examples,
[41:13.000 --> 41:21.000]  but when one enters a relationship of having counsel or having an attorney represent you,
[41:21.000 --> 41:28.000]  the relationship is very much like your award in the state, that they speak for you.
[41:28.000 --> 41:31.000]  I've heard that nonsense, and it's just not true.
[41:31.000 --> 41:38.000]  Your lawyer is under contract to you. You do not become an award in the state.
[41:38.000 --> 41:48.000]  Paul Hanson on March, Paul had things he wanted to say, and he asked his attorney to say them, and his attorney refused to say them.
[41:48.000 --> 41:54.000]  Now, if Paul would have stood up in court and started talking, I pretty much would guarantee you that judge would have said,
[41:54.000 --> 41:59.000]  you shut your mouth, you're going to be in contempt of court.
[41:59.000 --> 42:06.000]  Good chance he would have, depending on what Paul was saying.
[42:06.000 --> 42:17.000]  I sat as a mock judge in a mock trial once, and it was very, very frustrating, because Danny was a friend of mine,
[42:17.000 --> 42:23.000]  and he is bringing issues before me that are irrelevant.
[42:23.000 --> 42:32.000]  Yeah, he has all these opinions, and he thinks the system is corrupt, and all the judges are corrupt, and the law is being misapplied,
[42:32.000 --> 42:39.000]  but he didn't show me how. He made proactive statements of law out of his own mouth.
[42:39.000 --> 42:47.000]  He gave me argument without evidentiary support. He didn't give me anything I could work with.
[42:47.000 --> 42:50.000]  All I got was a bunch of moralizing from him, and I'm frustrated.
[42:50.000 --> 42:57.000]  He had a guy helping him who's pushing all this patriot mythology, and I called a sui sponte recess
[42:57.000 --> 43:04.000]  and told Danny that he should take this guy out behind the building and choke him,
[43:04.000 --> 43:10.000]  and he wouldn't be prosecuted, because this guy's going to get you put in jail.
[43:10.000 --> 43:21.000]  Thus, when I stepped into the judge's shoes, the only thing I can hear are the facts in accordance with the rules of evidence
[43:21.000 --> 43:28.000]  and the laws that apply to the facts. To talk about anything else, irrelevant.
[43:28.000 --> 43:34.000]  You can talk about it all you want to, and the judges sit there and listen attentively,
[43:34.000 --> 43:43.000]  but he will not tell you, I can't rule on that. He's not allowed to.
[43:43.000 --> 43:48.000]  Then he's likely to be frustrated because he can't. Hang on. Randy Kelton, you have our radio.
[43:48.000 --> 43:54.000]  I'll call it number 512-646-1984, and we'll be right back.
[43:54.000 --> 44:00.000]  Gary, Mark, hang on. We'll get to you. We'll be back.
[44:00.000 --> 44:06.000]  Hello. My name is Stuart Smith from NaturesPureOrganics.com,
[44:06.000 --> 44:12.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D, here in Austin, Texas,
[44:12.000 --> 44:18.000]  buying Brave New Books and JPEG to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.000 --> 44:26.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian EME oil,
[44:26.000 --> 44:30.000]  lotion candles, olive oil soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.000 --> 44:37.000]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at NaturesPureOrganics.com.
[44:37.000 --> 44:43.000]  That's 512-264-4043, NaturesPureOrganics.com.
[44:43.000 --> 44:47.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[44:47.000 --> 45:01.000]  NaturesPureOrganics.com.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:09.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand,
[45:09.000 --> 45:15.000]  4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.000 --> 45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:02.000]  Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:02.000 --> 46:24.000]  Music
[46:24.000 --> 46:25.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:25.000 --> 46:30.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Clint in Texas.
[46:30.000 --> 46:37.000]  Clint, for me, this is especially frustrating because I've been where Mr. Hanson is,
[46:37.000 --> 46:44.000]  and I understand how devastating what he's going through is.
[46:44.000 --> 46:50.000]  This is a time that he needs his friends to be very, very careful
[46:50.000 --> 46:56.000]  and only work in his behalf towards securing his liberty.
[46:56.000 --> 47:00.000]  It makes no difference what we think about the courts.
[47:00.000 --> 47:04.000]  It makes no difference how corrupt we think they are.
[47:04.000 --> 47:11.000]  What can we do to secure his liberty?
[47:11.000 --> 47:16.000]  As I stated before, we focus on the political aspect.
[47:16.000 --> 47:23.000]  If you're not a fool and you know that God exists, pray God Almighty on behalf of Paul Hanson.
[47:23.000 --> 47:26.000]  You're being very vague in general.
[47:26.000 --> 47:36.000]  What specifically can we do that may well lead to his exoneration?
[47:36.000 --> 47:41.000]  Randy, legally, if you want to mean specifically legally,
[47:41.000 --> 47:46.000]  he's being sentenced, I believe, the 26th of this month.
[47:46.000 --> 47:51.000]  So up until that time, he's already filed a brief for an acquittal.
[47:51.000 --> 47:53.000]  That's finalized.
[47:53.000 --> 48:00.000]  The only thing I can do is look at the legal documents he has,
[48:00.000 --> 48:06.000]  look at the United States Code, make sure everything falls in line according to statute,
[48:06.000 --> 48:09.000]  and that's the only focus I can do for other people.
[48:09.000 --> 48:11.000]  Okay, let me back up.
[48:11.000 --> 48:19.000]  You might be able to help him better understand what his position is.
[48:19.000 --> 48:31.000]  That pleading goes to the presumption that the law and the facts in the law matter.
[48:31.000 --> 48:34.000]  They only barely matter.
[48:34.000 --> 48:40.000]  The courts will not rule on the facts in the law, they rule on the politics.
[48:40.000 --> 48:49.000]  So how do we find politics that will work in Hanson's favor?
[48:49.000 --> 48:51.000]  I don't know.
[48:51.000 --> 48:57.000]  I do have him get counsel.
[48:57.000 --> 49:00.000]  It may be too late if he's already been convicted,
[49:00.000 --> 49:06.000]  but what it may not be too late for is to get counsel, not to adjudicate his case,
[49:06.000 --> 49:12.000]  but just to give the judge plausible deniability
[49:12.000 --> 49:21.000]  so that he can give Hanson time served and get him out of jail.
[49:21.000 --> 49:29.000]  Go to him, tell him to get counsel to argue for time served.
[49:29.000 --> 49:37.000]  They are not going to listen to him, but they will listen to one of their own.
[49:37.000 --> 49:43.000]  And if you listen to my show much, you know I am no fan of lawyers.
[49:43.000 --> 49:47.000]  I think they are the most corrupt people out there.
[49:47.000 --> 49:53.000]  However, in this circumstance, Jeff in Mississippi,
[49:53.000 --> 50:00.000]  they prosecuted him, found him guilty, and he's just wailing at his lawyer.
[50:00.000 --> 50:03.000]  And we convinced him to leave the lawyer alone.
[50:03.000 --> 50:09.000]  The lawyer got his case dismissed because this was an appellate court.
[50:09.000 --> 50:14.000]  It's a whole different structure in the appellate court.
[50:14.000 --> 50:18.000]  Here, this is not a trial anymore.
[50:18.000 --> 50:21.000]  This is just sentencing.
[50:21.000 --> 50:26.000]  Have him get counsel and argue for time served.
[50:26.000 --> 50:32.000]  If he argues for time served, you can be sure the judge is not going to give it to him
[50:32.000 --> 50:35.000]  simply because he's pro se.
[50:35.000 --> 50:41.000]  Now, that may not be right, but that's how it works in the world I live in.
[50:41.000 --> 50:46.000]  If you get a lawyer to walk in there and do this negotiation,
[50:46.000 --> 50:50.000]  very good chance you'll get him with time served.
[50:50.000 --> 50:56.000]  Then you can go back and fight all this corruption, all you want to.
[50:56.000 --> 51:00.000]  Does that make sense?
[51:00.000 --> 51:03.000]  I comprehend what you're saying.
[51:03.000 --> 51:05.000]  Randy, thank you for your time.
[51:05.000 --> 51:07.000]  You are most welcome.
[51:07.000 --> 51:08.000]  Thank you, Clint.
[51:08.000 --> 51:12.000]  Okay, we're going to Gary in Texas.
[51:12.000 --> 51:13.000]  Hello, Gary.
[51:13.000 --> 51:15.000]  Where have you been?
[51:15.000 --> 51:20.000]  Hey, I'm still kicking, brother.
[51:20.000 --> 51:24.000]  Just not kicking as high as you used to.
[51:24.000 --> 51:27.000]  Well, I'm just kicking groin like I usually do.
[51:27.000 --> 51:31.000]  I'm kind of kicking in the knee now so it didn't hurt so bad.
[51:31.000 --> 51:37.000]  As we get older, those kicks become more of a twitch.
[51:37.000 --> 51:41.000]  Okay, so here's the deal.
[51:41.000 --> 51:53.000]  I've got three persons who were accused of possession of stolen property,
[51:53.000 --> 51:58.000]  which they did not steal.
[51:58.000 --> 52:01.000]  And they all three agree.
[52:01.000 --> 52:11.000]  And none of them were properly mirandized the way I understand it.
[52:11.000 --> 52:19.000]  And none of them were the beneficiaries of a proper examination trial.
[52:19.000 --> 52:24.000]  They were merely put in jail, issued an accusative bond,
[52:24.000 --> 52:30.000]  had a magistrate bond hearing, and were released when they posted the bail money.
[52:30.000 --> 52:33.000]  So I've done a little research,
[52:33.000 --> 52:38.000]  and my good buddy and near-good buddy, Eddie,
[52:38.000 --> 52:48.000]  has commented on the requirements of a proper examination hearing
[52:48.000 --> 52:56.000]  as enumerated in Chapter 14, 15, and 16 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
[52:56.000 --> 53:02.000]  I talked to an attorney today, pad-linked, high-powered attorney,
[53:02.000 --> 53:07.000]  big money that they're going to charge me megabucks to try and help these people.
[53:07.000 --> 53:13.000]  And they do not know the requirements of an examination trial.
[53:13.000 --> 53:21.000]  And so I wanted to know if you have learned any additional information
[53:21.000 --> 53:27.000]  about the statutory requirements of an examination trial
[53:27.000 --> 53:32.000]  regarding arrest and incarceration, and when it's supposed to happen,
[53:32.000 --> 53:36.000]  and what can you do if it doesn't happen.
[53:36.000 --> 53:41.000]  Okay, go to jurisimprudence.com.
[53:41.000 --> 53:45.000]  And on the front you see a bunch of frogs.
[53:45.000 --> 53:51.000]  And I have those frogs on there because I call this whole mess the frog farm conspiracy.
[53:51.000 --> 53:55.000]  Click the top frog on the left.
[53:55.000 --> 54:03.000]  That will take you to a Hades Corpus I prepared for a kid in Conroe.
[54:03.000 --> 54:12.000]  It walks down due process with the case law in place.
[54:12.000 --> 54:19.000]  When a person is arrested, they are required to be directly to the nearest magistrate
[54:19.000 --> 54:24.000]  by the most direct route for an examining trial.
[54:24.000 --> 54:32.000]  This has been in law since 1216. There's no new law here.
[54:32.000 --> 54:42.000]  And then the magistrate at the examining trial is prepared to hold an examining trial
[54:42.000 --> 54:47.000]  in accordance with Chapter 16, Code of Criminal Procedure.
[54:47.000 --> 54:53.000]  Chapter 16, the whole chapter is about how to do an examining trial.
[54:53.000 --> 54:56.000]  They don't do it. We are preparing right now.
[54:56.000 --> 54:59.000]  We have a woman that works for me, got a ticket.
[54:59.000 --> 55:05.000]  I went to court with her and she introduced me as her counsel of choice.
[55:05.000 --> 55:08.000]  And the judge said, well, Mr. Kalkin, I'll let you speak here,
[55:08.000 --> 55:11.000]  but you will not be able to speak in the trial at par.
[55:11.000 --> 55:17.000]  So I asked the judge, is this an arraignment or an examining trial?
[55:17.000 --> 55:26.000]  Well, this is a hearing to get her plea and data file.
[55:26.000 --> 55:28.000]  I said, that's an arraignment.
[55:28.000 --> 55:31.000]  When she filed a citation, when she signed the citation,
[55:31.000 --> 55:36.000]  it was an agreement to appear before or some magistrate.
[55:36.000 --> 55:40.000]  Well, Mr. Kalkin, all judges are magistrates. It's your honor they are.
[55:40.000 --> 55:46.000]  But right now, which hat do you have on?
[55:46.000 --> 55:49.000]  Your court, your judge's hat or your magistrate's hat?
[55:49.000 --> 55:51.000]  Well, he didn't answer that one. He sidestepped it.
[55:51.000 --> 55:56.000]  That's when he realized that I knew the code.
[55:56.000 --> 56:01.000]  It's very clear in law that it was never the intent of the legislature
[56:01.000 --> 56:08.000]  that a police officer have the power to arrest and imprison.
[56:08.000 --> 56:11.000]  Granted, he's given the power to arrest,
[56:11.000 --> 56:15.000]  but he is required to take that person directly to the nearest magistrate
[56:15.000 --> 56:18.000]  and explain himself.
[56:18.000 --> 56:21.000]  I'm trying to remember the case. It's been so long.
[56:21.000 --> 56:29.000]  It's a 1926 case out of Texas, Boyd v. State, I believe it is.
[56:29.000 --> 56:34.000]  A guy's cutting a road with a maintainer.
[56:34.000 --> 56:36.000]  A fellow comes out next door and says, that's my property.
[56:36.000 --> 56:37.000]  What are you doing on here with a maintainer?
[56:37.000 --> 56:38.000]  I said, I'm cutting a road.
[56:38.000 --> 56:40.000]  He said, well, you quit cutting that road.
[56:40.000 --> 56:42.000]  I said, I'm not quitting cutting that road.
[56:42.000 --> 56:43.000]  He said, you quit cutting the road or I'll call the sheriff
[56:43.000 --> 56:45.000]  and come out here and arrest you.
[56:45.000 --> 56:48.000]  I said, you're going to have to because my boss told me to cut this road,
[56:48.000 --> 56:50.000]  so I'm going to cut this road.
[56:50.000 --> 56:54.000]  The sheriff came out, told him to get off that maintainer
[56:54.000 --> 56:57.000]  and follow me to my office.
[56:57.000 --> 57:00.000]  So he did.
[57:00.000 --> 57:05.000]  His office was in Corpus Christi, 26 miles away.
[57:05.000 --> 57:10.000]  Five miles away, they passed the justice and the peace.
[57:10.000 --> 57:16.000]  They held the guy for 45 minutes and then released him without further action.
[57:16.000 --> 57:24.000]  He sued them for not taking him directly to the nearest magistrate.
[57:24.000 --> 57:32.000]  In that document, it walks down due process, start to finish,
[57:32.000 --> 57:35.000]  as all the case law and all the Texas law.
[57:35.000 --> 57:42.000]  Read that a couple of times and you will have it down.
[57:42.000 --> 57:45.000]  Is it still there, Jerry?
[57:45.000 --> 57:46.000]  Yes, sir.
[57:46.000 --> 57:51.000]  And I want to say that according to my understanding,
[57:51.000 --> 57:56.000]  I am in full agreement that that is the requirement.
[57:56.000 --> 58:05.000]  But tell me why every single arrest ends up with the perpetrator being taken
[58:05.000 --> 58:11.000]  and booked into the jail without a proper examination trial.
[58:11.000 --> 58:16.000]  I am glad you asked me that question because I do have an answer.
[58:16.000 --> 58:20.000]  And we're about to go to break, so I'll bring that answer on the other side.
[58:20.000 --> 58:23.000]  There's a very good reason they do that.
[58:23.000 --> 58:26.000]  It serves their purpose.
[58:26.000 --> 58:28.000]  This is Randy Kelton, root of our radio.
[58:28.000 --> 58:33.000]  Our call-in number, 512-646-1984.
[58:33.000 --> 58:35.000]  Give us a call. We've got an hour left.
[58:35.000 --> 58:50.000]  We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 59:05.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[59:05.000 --> 59:20.000]  Yes, sir.
[59:20.000 --> 59:49.000]  Thank you.
[59:50.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  The following use flash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown,
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  providing you jelly bulletins for the commodity market.
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[01:00:21.000 --> 01:00:28.000]  Markets for the 11th of August 2015 opened up with gold at $1,108.78 an ounce,
[01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:33.000]  silver $15.32 an ounce, Texas crude $44.96 a barrel,
[01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:43.000]  and Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 270 U.S. currency.
[01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:48.000]  Today in history, Monday, August 11, 2003, a heat wave in Paris,
[01:00:48.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  France results in temperatures rising to 112 degrees Fahrenheit,
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:54.000]  leaving about 144 people dead.
[01:00:54.000 --> 01:00:59.000]  These temperatures pale in comparison to the whopping 136 degrees Fahrenheit
[01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:08.000]  reached in San Luis Potosi, Mexico on this day in 1933.
[01:01:08.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  In recent news, Verizon Wireless says that it has successfully tested its new technology,
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  the Next Generation Passive Optical Network or NGPON2,
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:21.000]  which delivers broadband speeds of up to 10 gigabytes per second.
[01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  That's 10 times faster than the speeds of Google Fiber,
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:30.000]  which is fast considering that Google is already 100 times faster than the average broadband connection.
[01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:35.000]  The company says that by simply adding new colors of light onto the existing fiber network,
[01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:46.000]  it could possibly boost speeds as lightning fast as 40 to 80 gigabytes per second.
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:48.000]  Talk about a shotgun wedding.
[01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:56.000]  Poston Bundy, 21, pleaded guilty on July 2 to assault with bodily injury from a fistfight that he got into with the former boyfriend of his girlfriend,
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  Elizabeth Jaynes, back in February.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:04.000]  Smith County Judge Randall Rogers gave him the choice between either two years of probation or 15 days in jail.
[01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  What's the catch?
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:11.000]  Well, apparently the probation terms included requiring Bundy to write out Problems 2627.
[01:02:11.000 --> 01:02:15.000]  If a man digs a pit, he will fall into it 25 times a day.
[01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:19.000]  And get this, probation terms include getting married within 30 days.
[01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:28.000]  The couple had their state-managed wedding at City Hall on July 20.
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  The CryptoShow.com is hosting a Free Ross Appeal fundraiser.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  Ross Olbert was sentenced to life in prison for his alleged role in the Dark Web Silk Road online platform.
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:40.000]  Many great items will be auctioned off for Ross's legal appeal.
[01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:48.000]  The event is scheduled for the 15th of August, 6 to 10 p.m. at the Brave New Bookstore off of Guadalupe and Martin Luther King in Austin, Texas.
[01:02:48.000 --> 01:02:55.000]  For more information, please visit TheCryptoShow.com.
[01:02:55.000 --> 01:03:10.000]  This has been your Lowdown for August 11, 2013.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:30.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:30.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  Randy Kelton with New Girl Radio.
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  And we're talking to Gary in Texas.
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:47.000]  Okay, Gary, why would they arrest someone and take them to jail rather than holding an examining trial?
[01:03:47.000 --> 01:04:03.000]  Well, the reason is every step as presently practiced in the criminal justice system in the state of Texas is not only wrong, it is very specifically against particular law.
[01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:11.000]  And that brief on the Jewish and Prudence page stipulates precisely how it's against law.
[01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  And it also goes on to explain why it's done the way it's done.
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:32.000]  It's done the way it's done so that the courts can put every person accused of crime in a position such that they have no reasonable option but to take a deal.
[01:04:32.000 --> 01:04:44.000]  Everything is about applying psychological pressure to the arrested individual to force him to take a deal when the prosecutor brings it to him.
[01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:49.000]  This way they don't have to go to all the trouble of having all of these trials.
[01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:58.000]  They're not burdened with the expense of these trials, yet they get the person on probation.
[01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:09.000]  And almost all of these get a penalty and or probation.
[01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:20.000]  They want your own probation because if you pay a fine or a fee, the fine or fee goes to the Texas General Fund.
[01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  But if you get a penalty, the penalty goes to the individual.
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  I actually lost my place.
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  Gary, why did I say that?
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:37.000]  I don't know if you lost it.
[01:05:37.000 --> 01:05:42.000]  I'm sorry, I'm sorry, not penalty, probation fees.
[01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:43.000]  Okay, got it, got it.
[01:05:43.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  Probation fees, if the issue of fine, and the fine goes to the General Fund, if they issue a probation fee, not a penalty, a probation fee, that stays in the county.
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:07.000]  So what they're doing is, is trying to get everybody on probation.
[01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  They'll tend to look at how large your estate is.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  Based on the size of the estate, they will assess a bail amount, and then they'll look at your estate at court and say, okay, how much can we extract from this individual?
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  We put him on probation, how long can we keep him on probation and collect that 50 bucks a month?
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:52.000]  Now, if we put him on probation and we collect our 50 bucks a month, and he's got a more available income, then we can issue a fine and send that money to the General Fund.
[01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  But they don't really care about that part.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  The county wants to keep all the money they can in the county.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:06.000]  That's why every step is done the way it's done.
[01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:18.000]  They've set this up so that by the time they get you before a judge, you're ready to take anything just to get out from under this hassle.
[01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:20.000]  Does that make sense, Gary?
[01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:39.000]  Well, it does, but the problem is, what if a arrested individual says, hey, I object to this process, and I happen to know that statute requires you to take me directly to a magistrate,
[01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:55.000]  rather than booking me into the general jail population and issuing an acute bond, which you then trade on the SEC, and it is actually a securities bond, which is publicly traded.
[01:07:55.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  So I object to your process, and I demand to speak to a magistrate.
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:10.000]  Let me tell you what we're going to do in a case that's coming up the 15th of February.
[01:08:10.000 --> 01:08:16.000]  I'm thinking of yours trying to see how we can get to the same place.
[01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:17.000]  We have the same outcome.
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:19.000]  We just don't have the same front end.
[01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:21.000]  A woman gets a ticket.
[01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:26.000]  She works for me, and she wants me to come to court with her.
[01:08:26.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  So I go to court with her, and she tells the judge that I'm her counsel of choice.
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  And I went through the routine about a holding and examining trial, and he said, well, that they have a policy that the policy is that for a classy misdemeanor, an examining trial is not required.
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Well, I couldn't find that in code anywhere.
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:08:53.000]  That's not.
[01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  That's why.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  Right.
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  So here's the deal.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:11.000]  She was pulled over and given a ticket, and she was informed that if she signed this ticket with a promise to appear, that he wouldn't have to take her to jail.
[01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  So, okay.
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:21.000]  So she signed the ticket, and then she came to trial on the day at the time the ticket instructed her to.
[01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:35.000]  But instead of holding the examining trial, they forced her to hold it out to participate in an arraignment hearing.
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:47.000]  An arraignment hearing is a hearing for the purpose of determining your identity and taking a plea.
[01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  That's what they're required to do.
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  Okay.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:55.000]  That's an arraignment.
[01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  That's essentially what they did.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:01.000]  Problem.
[01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  There's nothing in law that allows them to do that.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:13.000]  When she signed the ticket, what did the ticket say?
[01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:16.000]  You ever looked at what it says, Gary?
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  Yeah.
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:21.000]  I promised to appear before a magistrate.
[01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:43.000]  So she promised to appear before a magistrate, and in the transportation code, the only time a policeman can release someone on their own recognizance is if they file a promise to appear before some magistrate, not judge.
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:56.000]  So she signed the document, promised to appear, and appeared at the time she blamed as she would, and they forced her into an arraignment hearing.
[01:10:56.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  They forced her to stand before a judge.
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  What crime did they commit?
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  Securing and executing a document by deception.
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  That's correct. Entering into deceptive contract.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:25.000]  They passed that particular statute, the legislature did, to stop the Republic of Texas from filing liens against public officials.
[01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  Now we get to take it and use it against them.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:33.000]  Securing and executing a document by deception.
[01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:39.000]  That ticket was clearly designed to deceive.
[01:11:39.000 --> 01:12:00.000]  Now, what I was listening for when you were talking was how we can apply that here because he was arrested, and he was required to be taken before a magistrate, but he was taken before a judge instead.
[01:12:00.000 --> 01:12:08.000]  So how do we make a claim on that?
[01:12:08.000 --> 01:12:11.000]  That's a problem. I haven't got that part figured out yet.
[01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  However, if you look at that habeas, it gives all of the steps. It was intended that the police not have the power to punish, that they take the person before the nearest magistrate by the most direct route, and the magistrate is to hold an examining trial.
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:37.000]  Have you ever seen the program Night Court?
[01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:38.000]  Yes.
[01:12:38.000 --> 01:12:43.000]  It was about New York City. They still do that.
[01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:58.000]  What you were seeing, if you watched Night Court, what you were seeing was a court with a prosecutor, Dan Larroquette, and a defense attorney.
[01:12:58.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  Well, how that happened was in New York, if you're arrested, you're taken to jail and held only long enough to be appointed counsel, and they have counsel that is appointed for that purpose and that purpose alone, and that's right in the code.
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:26.000]  So what they're supposed to do is hold them long enough to get them before counsel, and then they come before the judge.
[01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  The policeman tells his side, the accused tells his side, and the judge decides which one he believes in either issues a warrant or issues a order stating that the person was released at their liberty.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:57.000]  This is what they're required to do, but they're doing something else.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:14:00.000]  So how do we make the claim?
[01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:08.000]  I charge them with official oppression, but official oppression is not as elegant as I would like it to be.
[01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:20.000]  The idea about the ticket thing where we charge them with curing and executing, that's nice and elegant.
[01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:24.000]  But how do we fight this in a way that's more elegant?
[01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:29.000]  The way to do it is straightforward. We talk about this all the time on the air.
[01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:40.000]  You're supposed to arrest them, take them directly to the nearest magistrate. The magistrate is supposed to hold an examining trial. Chapter 16, a whole chapter says this is what constitutes an examining trial.
[01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:48.000]  You must give the person, first thing, opportunity to make a statement before there's any testimony.
[01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:57.000]  You tell him you're supposed to tell him he has the right to remain silent, but you give him an opportunity to make a statement before the policeman says anything.
[01:14:57.000 --> 01:15:01.000]  Write her in the code.
[01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:07.000]  The times I've been arrested, I was never given an opportunity to make a statement.
[01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:16.000]  Then the judge has to read in his rights and allow him time to secure counsel if they don't have counsel for him.
[01:15:16.000 --> 01:15:20.000]  It's a whole chapter of things they have to do.
[01:15:20.000 --> 01:15:31.000]  Never had it done, and I've never had it done, but I have heard stories of it being done.
[01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:42.000]  They chased a guy halfway across Dallas, Fort Worth, arrested him for murder. He murdered two or three people.
[01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  They arrested him and took him directly to the nearest magistrate. It was during the day.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:57.000]  The magistrate held an examining trial, found probable cause, and gave them a warrant.
[01:15:57.000 --> 01:16:01.000]  All of the things the code of criminal procedure requires them to do.
[01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  Now, how on earth did these police know to do that in this circumstance where they got a really bad guy and they don't want him to get away?
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  So they made sure they had that examining trial.
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:23.000]  That means they already knew how to do it.
[01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:31.000]  They knew when and how to do it, but they pretend like they don't.
[01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:34.000]  Does that sound reasonable?
[01:16:34.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  Yeah, and I want to follow up with you. It's great.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  Okay, call me in the morning. I do better earlier than later.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:56.000]  If anybody's listening real close, they can probably tell that I'm beginning to sag a little bit because I started about 3 o'clock this morning.
[01:16:56.000 --> 01:17:00.000]  And I'm getting old.
[01:17:00.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  Chances are you've heard of My Magic Mud, but have you used it?
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  Thousands of people are blown away by the clean and healthy feeling they experience after just one use.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.000]  Here's what Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, has to say about the product.
[01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  Hey everybody, this is Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books. Just want to tell everybody about My Magic Mud.
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:23.000]  I use the product and it makes my teeth feel clean and healthy. I think it makes them stronger.
[01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  I've got lots of customers that come in and say the same thing. You can pick yours up at Brave New Books.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:33.000]  If that wasn't enough, Dr. Griffin Cole, DDS, who's been featured on The Alex Jones Show, loves it too.
[01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  Hi, I'm Dr. Griffin Cole, and I've got to tell you, I really love this Magic Mud product.
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Because charcoal is so absorbent, it's very effective at taking off all the sticky plaque and debris that gets stuck on our teeth every day.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  I highly recommend My Magic Mud.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  If you haven't yet experienced My Magic Mud, it's never too late to brighten your smile and strengthen your teeth.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:56.000]  Get your jar of My Magic Mud today at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[01:17:56.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  or order online today at MyMagicMud.com.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:19.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting, as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular young Jevity products, such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollenbursts.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnet Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:55.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullion.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:11.000]  This is the Logos Mofogos Radio Network.
[01:19:11.000 --> 01:19:21.000]  Oh, come on.
[01:19:21.000 --> 01:19:33.000]  Okay, we are back and Gary, I kind of went on a monologue there because I knew that for the most part you already know this information.
[01:19:33.000 --> 01:19:37.000]  We've talked about this a number of times.
[01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:45.000]  In the times that you've addressed this, have you ever been able to get a judge to actually hold an examining trial?
[01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:51.000]  No, I never have. And this is one of the questions I wanted to ask you.
[01:19:51.000 --> 01:20:07.000]  There is, as you know, there is a case called Walther A. Rothgeary versus Gillespie County, Texas, which went to the Supreme Court of the United States.
[01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:11.000]  I'm very familiar with Rothgeary v. Gillespie.
[01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:22.000]  Yes, sir. That's a definitive case which was argued in March of 2008, decided in June of 2008,
[01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  and it definitely states the requirements under Texas statute that an arrested person be taken directly to a magistrate
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  with the explicit instruction that the magistrate hold an examination trial prior to the incarceration of the arrested individual.
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:21:05.000]  It is so explicit and yet power, like as I experienced today with a very high-powered attorney, we don't know about that.
[01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  They don't have to take him to an examination court. You have to request an examination trial.
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:24.000]  I'm going, no, no, no, no, no. Even it says in articles and in a chapter 14, 15, 16 Code of Criminal Procedure,
[01:21:24.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  in any ANY, any criminal accusation, an examination trial is required, period.
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  I have a whole room. I did have a room.
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  Don't put me on hold, please. If any arresting officer should take a suspicious individual and book them in the jail,
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  make them part of the jail population before that examination trial takes place,
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:13.000]  I believe, according to the statute, that that officer has committed aggravated kidnapping in the state of Texas.
[01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  What do you say?
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  That's exactly the argument that I make in the habeas corpus, that the officer has, okay, what Gerstein Pugh says,
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  that it would be preferable that every arrest be made on an existing warrant. But that is unreasonable.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  And as a reasonable compromise, the police are allowed to arrest for an on-site offense.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:02.000]  But after they have performed those duties incidental to arrest,
[01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:10.000]  for the purpose of ensuring the safety of the officers and ensuring against the escape of the accused,
[01:23:10.000 --> 01:23:16.000]  their right to hold the person evaporates.
[01:23:16.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  They must get them before an examining trial for a determination by the court to give them jurisdiction.
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:35.000]  The Gerstein Pugh is real clear on the procedure, and that's the Gerstein Pugh's federal. It's in the habeas.
[01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:45.000]  So the law is unequivocal. So, Gary, what's the remedy?
[01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:55.000]  I think criminal charges, the grand jury against the perpetrating officer and magistrate.
[01:23:55.000 --> 01:23:59.000]  Did you hear the first part of the show?
[01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:02.000]  Unfortunately, no.
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:15.000]  Okay, I was reading about, let's go back to the top, Public Integrity Unit.
[01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  We've had some changes in the Public Integrity Unit. Are you familiar with those changes?
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  I am. No, well, I'm going to say no, probably not. I probably need a quick step.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:36.000]  We're going to sew like this. You remember me talking about how a Public Integrity Unit for a prosecuting attorney
[01:24:36.000 --> 01:24:42.000]  amounts to a criminal conspiracy to commit.
[01:24:42.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  In that, under Article 2.03, and it should be noted 2.03, not 2.196 or something.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:25:01.000]  Chapter 3.1, the first, Under Duties of Officers, Chapter 2.
[01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:10.000]  2.01 tells the, it says, it shall be the primary duty of the prosecuting attorney not to secure conviction,
[01:25:10.000 --> 01:25:14.000]  but to ensure that justice is served.
[01:25:14.000 --> 01:25:21.000]  He shall not seek with evidence or witnesses or evidence that would show the innocence of the accused and mitigate the guilt of the accused.
[01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  That's nice, high-minded rhetoric, but it really doesn't stipulate something that the prosecutor must do.
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:44.000]  2.02 states that in suits against the state, the district attorney will represent suits against the state and prosecute criminal complaints.
[01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:55.000]  The county shall represent the state in county suits, represent the state in county suits, and they do several other things.
[01:25:55.000 --> 01:26:06.000]  Okay, the 2.03, third one.
[01:26:06.000 --> 01:26:13.000]  This is the first one that tells the prosecutor something they must do.
[01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  When a prosecuting attorney is made known in any manner, and I'm paraphrasing here, that a public official has violated a law relating to his office,
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  he shall reduce complaints when information is submitted to the grand jury.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:29.000]  It used to say forthwith, they took that out.
[01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:32.000]  How hard is that to understand?
[01:26:32.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  So how can you have a public integrity unit?
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:37.000]  I agree.
[01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  Yeah, you can investigate this. If you do anything other than send that to the grand jury, you're violating code.
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  They fixed it.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:53.000]  Prosecutors no longer have their own public integrity units.
[01:26:53.000 --> 01:26:56.000]  They're all Texas Rangers.
[01:26:56.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  The Texas Rangers have been designated as the public integrity unit.
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:08.000]  Yahoo!
[01:27:08.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  Texas Rangers, as a part of the Department of Public Safety, for a long time there was essentially impotent.
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:29.000]  They could not investigate a public official without the express permission of the colonel himself, the director of the DPS.
[01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:34.000]  So they didn't have much power.
[01:27:34.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  This statute just changed all that.
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:53.000]  Now you take your complaint to the Texas Rangers, and it is their duty to investigate into all claims against public officials.
[01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:56.000]  I have a question for you.
[01:27:56.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  Okay.
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  All right, so previously I submitted notarized criminal complaints against a Department of Public Safety officer for aggravated kidnapping and aggravated perjury.
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  And I took it to my district attorney, and he accepted and signed my document, my complaint.
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:34.000]  It sat for 90 days.
[01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  I went and asked him about the disposition of my complaint, and he said, I SH Explicit T candid.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:50.000]  I go, oh, really?
[01:28:50.000 --> 01:28:59.000]  I think that you have to take that document and reduce it to an information and send it to the grand jury.
[01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  He said, no, I'm supposed to investigate it, and I thought there was no merit to it.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:11.000]  So have you filed criminal charges against the district attorney with the grand jury?
[01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  I went to the district judge and implored her duties as a magistrate to accept a criminal complaint against the district attorney.
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:32.000]  She told me, I'm sorry, I can't accept that.
[01:29:32.000 --> 01:29:40.000]  You'll have to go to a law enforcement agency, such as the sheriff.
[01:29:40.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  Okay, did you go to the law enforcement agency with criminal complaints against the judge?
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  No, I did not.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  That's the next step.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  Shielding from prosecution, 3805, penal code is a felony in the state of Texas.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  I gave her a reprieve.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:08.000]  You may have heard of whistling while you work, but how about walking while working at your cubicle?
[01:30:08.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and in a moment I'll tell you about the latest concept in health conscious office furniture, treadmill desks.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:28.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:41.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:49.000]  Sitting all day can take years off your life, and standing is hard on your back.
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  So what's a desk-bound cubicle jockey to do?
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:54.000]  How about getting a treadmill desk?
[01:30:54.000 --> 01:31:01.000]  Invented by Dr. James Levine at the Mayo Clinic, the walk station is a slow-moving treadmill rigged up to a desk.
[01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:04.000]  Workers do their normal activities while slowly walking.
[01:31:04.000 --> 01:31:11.000]  Companies from Mutual of Omaha to Humana have signed on, buying these gizmos at $4,300 a pop.
[01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:14.000]  The goal is to lower health care costs by keeping people moving.
[01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:17.000]  They really work, and employees say they love them.
[01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  But if you think your workday feels like a treadmill now, just wait till the boss cranks that dial up to high.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:47.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:31:58.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:58.000 --> 01:32:01.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:01.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:07.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:12.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails, but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:15.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails, but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  That's why you have insurance, and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you with little to no out-of-pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:39.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off, and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking, your door should be locking.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:17.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:34.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:44.000]  I'm talking to Gary in Texas, and I get to do things with Gary in Texas because I know he's very knowledgeable.
[01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  Okay, we are about to get the Texas Rangers as a new public integrity unit.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:34:11.000]  So they haven't been one yet, so we may have an opportunity to get them to do something before they get their politics all structured and in place.
[01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:30.000]  So what do you think about preparing a story that follows the progression through all of these public officials and present this to the Texas Rangers?
[01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:38.000]  See, I'm thinking the Texas Rangers don't understand due process any better than the judges and lawyers do.
[01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  But if we construct our pleadings carefully, they will instruct.
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:58.000]  And if we get some of these Rangers instructed in how it's supposed to be, we may actually get some enthusiastic about fixing what they know is broken.
[01:34:58.000 --> 01:35:05.000]  Okay, so I have an observation and a question.
[01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  The Texas Rangers are, of course, a subgroup of the Department of Public Safety.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:36.000]  And they have basically been a tar baby. They've basically been a non-influential investigative arm of the Texas Department of Public Safety.
[01:35:36.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  But now they're given some accuracy and some effect, right?
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:36:02.000]  So I know a couple of Texas Ranger officers, and I have found them to be highly professional, really smart people, just like you and I thought that DPS was 15 years ago.
[01:36:02.000 --> 01:36:16.000]  We thought they were credible people. Now they're just ex-military guys on steroids and serotonin re-uptake inhibitor drugs, and they're just thugs.
[01:36:16.000 --> 01:36:29.000]  But the Texas Rangers are rather an elite group of sophisticated, credible individuals, in my opinion.
[01:36:29.000 --> 01:36:34.000]  I could be wrong, but that's what I think they are.
[01:36:34.000 --> 01:36:44.000]  Yeah, and you know, we talked on this show about potential remedies. How do we fix this situation?
[01:36:44.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  And somebody, I don't know who presented this, but somebody come up with a better solution than I would have thought of.
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:37:04.000]  You know, I had been suggesting that we take the public integrity unit and attach it to the grand jury.
[01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  And I knew I would get a lot of feedback on that. You know, in California, that's essentially the way it is.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:21.000]  The grand jury has their own investigating team, and they can investigate not only into criminal complaints,
[01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  they can also investigate into government agencies and government contracts.
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:34.000]  So here in Texas, you know, we have a good grand jury system,
[01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:44.000]  but getting the public integrity unit assigned to the grand jury would have been appropriate,
[01:37:44.000 --> 01:37:54.000]  but politically, I couldn't see that we could get it done. But somebody proposed this legislation and apparently lobbied it through.
[01:37:54.000 --> 01:38:00.000]  That was more elegant. I hadn't thought about the Texas Rangers.
[01:38:00.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  And I've picked on them about being impotent, because up until this point,
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:15.000]  a Texas Ranger could not take a complaint against a public official or investigate a public official
[01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:22.000]  without the express permission of the director himself.
[01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  So that kind of made them just like museum guards. They just walk around for show. They don't do much.
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:42.000]  This legislation is going to reinvigorate the Texas Rangers. It is my opinion.
[01:38:42.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  I don't know about you, Gary, but I'm betting these guys are just chomping at the bit to be able to get out here
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:38:54.000]  and start rooting out public corruption.
[01:38:54.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  Who is the Texas Ranger? What's his name that was in these—he always carried a single-action army, Colt 45,
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  and he wrote books about being a Texas Ranger. He used to appear at bars in San Antonio.
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:14.000]  Do you know who I'm talking about?
[01:39:14.000 --> 01:39:16.000]  No, I don't know who that is.
[01:39:16.000 --> 01:39:27.000]  His name is Justine. I don't remember his name, but I've looked at him. I've seen his eyes.
[01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  And this guy is one guy that—and I'm not afraid of anybody.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:40.000]  This is the one guy that I would have second thoughts about.
[01:39:40.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  I know that guy.
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:51.000]  He was a real Texas Ranger who really, really went up against bad guys.
[01:39:51.000 --> 01:40:01.000]  I was at the Third Field Hospital. I was at the—not Third Field—Constitute Air Base, Saigon, South Vietnam.
[01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:07.000]  And this guy walked out of the Buffalo Grab. That's on the edge of the runway.
[01:40:07.000 --> 01:40:13.000]  He was holding his M-16 by the strap and the butt of it dragging on the ground.
[01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:26.000]  I don't know how long he had been out there, but something in his eyes said that he looked at me like I was nothing more than meat.
[01:40:26.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  The guy scared me. Not that I thought he would hurt me or anything, but I looked at him and I thought, what on earth have we done to this child?
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:45.000]  He could have been 22, 23, but he had this look that he had just killed too many people.
[01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:49.000]  I still see that look on occasion.
[01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:56.000]  I see people that I say to myself, Seth, do not mess with this guy.
[01:40:56.000 --> 01:41:09.000]  And yes, the Texas Rangers I've seen, the one thing I see in their style is professional pride.
[01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  Sam Hudson, the one in Stephenville, is the only one that didn't have that.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  He was overweight. He was slovenly. He did not look like the Texas Rangers I was accustomed to seeing.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:40.000]  Always well dressed, always dressed similarly, always with that white stetson, and very, very proud.
[01:41:40.000 --> 01:41:49.000]  I am pleased to see that this is going to the Texas Rangers. It's a better solution than I would have ever thought of.
[01:41:49.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  Now what you and I have to do is train the Texas Rangers.
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:10.000]  We train them by giving them well-crafted criminal complaints about public officials shielding other public officials
[01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:20.000]  with the implication that the public officials on the end that are committing these acts are not the problem.
[01:42:20.000 --> 01:42:24.000]  The problem are the public officials in the background.
[01:42:24.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  When I go to a district judge of all people and invoke his duty as a magistrate, he refuses to perform it.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:41.000]  And I show a Texas Ranger specific statute and case law.
[01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:48.000]  I suspect that the Texas Ranger is not going to care that this guy is a district judge.
[01:42:48.000 --> 01:42:58.000]  He won't be impressed. And they may actually, you know, I'm thinking they're going to want to make a name for themselves.
[01:42:58.000 --> 01:43:09.000]  I'm going to file against the governor. I'm going to accuse him of conspiring to obstruct justice.
[01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:19.000]  And she will from prosecution because the judge who prosecuted me because I filed criminal charges against him at the grand jury.
[01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:27.000]  He pulled a shenanigan and he changed an order of another judge.
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:36.000]  And Greg Abbott told him that if you'll just resign, I won't prosecute.
[01:43:36.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  Is that a fact, Jack? And just where did you get the authority to make that deal?
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  I called that shielded prosecution and I want to send the Texas Rangers after.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  Hang on. We'll be right back. Randy Carlton, you have our radio. I called him. I'm not going to do that.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  What?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt. And like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity. But there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombie-ism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them in 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:01.000]  The great effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:16.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4CE course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:16.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit lulavlogradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:40.000]  We're here with Gary in Texas.
[01:46:40.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  Gary, you have a number of this type of issue where you have a shooting.
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:52.000]  Yes, I do.
[01:46:52.000 --> 01:46:55.000]  In fact, I'd like to give you some information.
[01:46:55.000 --> 01:47:04.000]  The name of the officer that I was referring to is Officer Joaquin Jackson,
[01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  and you can find him on numerous Internet websites.
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  But one thing interesting that I found, I'm going to read it to you.
[01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:33.000]  It says the Texas Highway Patrol Service is responsible for police traffic supervision,
[01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:54.000]  Major Eric Black, general police work on highways, public safety education, and police and security functions for the state capitol building and capitol complex.
[01:47:54.000 --> 01:48:05.000]  The Highway Patrol Service consists 2,174 commissioned officers.
[01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:11.000]  That's on Joaquin Jackson's Internet page.
[01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:36.000]  And I will tell you that there are not 2,174 commissioned officers that are delegated authorization to enforce Texas Transportation Code within the so-called state of Texas.
[01:48:36.000 --> 01:48:50.000]  So everywhere you look, there is larceny and lies regarding where authority is lawfully granted and issued.
[01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:54.000]  Let me address that statement.
[01:48:54.000 --> 01:49:00.000]  I notice in the statement he kept saying policing.
[01:49:00.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  Yes.
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:08.000]  The Department of Public Safety officers are police officers.
[01:49:08.000 --> 01:49:09.000]  Correct.
[01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:20.000]  In Texas, we have a separate definition for a police officer and a peace officer.
[01:49:20.000 --> 01:49:38.000]  The administrative code that creates the Department of Public Safety says the Department of Public Safety personnel shall not enforce the criminal laws except at the request of and under the direction of local law enforcement.
[01:49:38.000 --> 01:49:42.000]  And that's because they are police officers.
[01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:49.000]  Police officers are officers authorized to enforce traffic code.
[01:49:49.000 --> 01:50:01.000]  Now, while each one of these police officers is certified as a peace officer, they are not employed in that capacity.
[01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:03.000]  Correct.
[01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:04.000]  Just traffic cops.
[01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:13.000]  And that's why he kept saying police officer instead of peace officer.
[01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:20.000]  That's my story. I'm sticking to it. But I think we have an opportunity here.
[01:50:20.000 --> 01:50:22.000]  Go ahead.
[01:50:22.000 --> 01:50:32.000]  Well, I was just going to say you go to Title 37, Code of, I think it's Texas Government Code, forgive me if I'm wrong, Eddie Craig, my dear buddy.
[01:50:32.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  But Title 3, Chapter 4.13 specifically states the qualifications for authorization to enforce Texas traffic code.
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:17.000]  And what you find when you do a Public Information Act request with the Department of Public Safety, there is about 56 officers in the entire state that are authorized to enforce traffic code.
[01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:27.000]  And what the DPS calls those officers are DOT officers, Department of Transportation officers.
[01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:32.000]  But under the code, those are the only ones authorized to enforce the traffic code.
[01:51:32.000 --> 01:51:34.000]  That is exactly right.
[01:51:34.000 --> 01:52:01.000]  So in all of your little municipalities like my beloved Castroville, Texas, my beloved Hondo, my beloved Bandera, there are no police officers which are authorized to enforce Texas transportation code in this state.
[01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:15.000]  If you read the requirements, local police, local peace officers can enforce the traffic code under certain circumstances.
[01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:18.000]  It has to be a county of over 2 million.
[01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:24.000]  There's a whole raft of requirements that they have to meet.
[01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  They have to meet DOT certifications and, you know, I live in a county of 35,000.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:34.000]  They do not meet the requirements.
[01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:34.000]  Correct.
[01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:37.000]  They can't enforce the traffic code, period.
[01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:39.000]  Right.
[01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  But, David, the police have interpreted those restrictions only to go to extend to DOT officers.
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:53:08.000]  My last ticket in Hazel, Texas, I stated the, cited the administrative code that created the DPS and the transportation code and who could enforce it under what circumstances.
[01:53:08.000 --> 01:53:21.000]  And I requested to see the police officers accreditation and authorization to enforce the traffic code.
[01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:26.000]  And I gave that as an information request and this clerk got it.
[01:53:26.000 --> 01:53:30.000]  She came back and she said, Mr. Kelsey, I read your request.
[01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:33.000]  Can you be a little more specific?
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  And I said, yes, ma'am, I can.
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:42.000]  I want exactly what I asked for in that request.
[01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:52.000]  And she stood there looking at me like, as clear as she was thinking, could I get away with it if I just shoot with this guy?
[01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  I came to court and the judge said, is the prosecution ready?
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:03.000]  The prosecutor said, no, your honor, the prosecution's not ready.
[01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:05.000]  The judge said, case dismissed.
[01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:07.000]  I object.
[01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:09.000]  Mr. Kelsey, I dismissed your case.
[01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:10.000]  You can object.
[01:54:10.000 --> 01:54:12.000]  I said, yeah, I can.
[01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:16.000]  We were just about to get to the good part.
[01:54:16.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  But on the next one, we're going to do the scurrying and executing a document by deception.
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  See how they like that one.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:33.000]  Yeah, and you know, you've got seven minutes left on your radio show tonight.
[01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:44.000]  And the fact is that whenever you go through a local municipality in most cities in the so-called quotes of Texas,
[01:54:44.000 --> 01:54:58.000]  those police officers are impersonating transportation officers because they are not specifically authorized to write a traffic ticket,
[01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:06.000]  to write a no-signal ticket, to write a lights-out ticket, nothing.
[01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:12.000]  They're not authorized statutorily to write a citation.
[01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:18.000]  So they are impersonating police officers in the state of Texas.
[01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:19.000]  Exactly.
[01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:22.000]  And that's exactly the issue of the recent number of times.
[01:55:22.000 --> 01:55:23.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:26.000]  100% exactly right.
[01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  They could enforce laws to enhance traffic safety, but not the way they did it.
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:43.000]  They enforced them under a commercial driver's license.
[01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  That license you have in your pocket is a commercial chauffeur's license.
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:51.000]  So I've heard people say, do you have a chauffeur's license?
[01:55:51.000 --> 01:55:54.000]  So everybody's got a chauffeur's license.
[01:55:54.000 --> 01:56:04.000]  That is a license authorizing you to transport persons or property for hire.
[01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:16.000]  And you're the one that originally came up with, yes, I have a license, but I'm not using it right now.
[01:56:16.000 --> 01:56:19.000]  Got me out of a ticket in Austin.
[01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:20.000]  Thank you.
[01:56:20.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  Tool 174.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:26.000]  May I see your license?
[01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:28.000]  I gave you my ID.
[01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:30.000]  He goes to his car, comes back, Mr. Kelton.
[01:56:30.000 --> 01:56:32.000]  This is a Texas ID.
[01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  I said, yes, it is.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  Do you have a driver's license?
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:40.000]  Yes, I do, but I'm not using it right now.
[01:56:40.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  Thank you.
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:50.000]  And the officer said, are you one of those guys?
[01:56:50.000 --> 01:56:52.000]  We've been there and I didn't want to go back.
[01:56:52.000 --> 01:56:55.000]  And we need more people taking them there.
[01:56:55.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  And I'm hoping that we need you and me, we need to put together a set of complaints that tracks each step
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  and builds a story of corruption by public officials not following law
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  and each official down the line protecting that person.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:33.000]  I would say that it's much easier than you think it is.
[01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:40.000]  It's much simpler than you think it is because they're so corrupt,
[01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:58.000]  they don't realize that they're steeped in deception against the people that pay their salaries.
[01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:13.000]  If you want to live, treat me good. If you want to live, live, I beg you, treat me good.
[01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  I'm like a walking razor, don't you watch my side, I'm dangerous.
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:43.000]  If you are a bully, treat me good. If you are a bully, a bully, I beg you, treat me good.
[01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  I'm like a stepping razor, don't you watch my side, I'm dangerous.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:04.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse
[01:59:04.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:11.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:27.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references plus charts and maps
[01:59:27.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:32.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:32.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:02.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it, LogosRadioNetwork.com.