[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000]  The following newsflash is brought to you by the Lone Star Lowdown, providing the jelly
[00:06.000 --> 00:08.000]  bulletins for the commodities market.
[00:08.000 --> 00:21.000]  Today in history, news updates and the inside scoop into the tides of the alternative.
[00:21.000 --> 00:27.000]  Markets for the 18th of June, 2015, opened up with gold at $1,201.54 an ounce.
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.000]  Silver, $16.18 an ounce. Texas crude, $59.92 a barrel.
[00:32.000 --> 00:35.000]  And Bitcoin is currently sitting at about 250 U.S. currency.
[00:35.000 --> 00:46.000]  Today in history, Thursday, June 18, 1959, then Governor of Louisiana, Earl K. Long,
[00:46.000 --> 00:49.000]  is committed to a state mental hospital.
[00:49.000 --> 00:54.000]  He responds by having the hospital's director, Jesse Bankson, fired and replaces him with
[00:54.000 --> 01:05.000]  crony supporter, Bill Dodd, who proclaims Long perfectly sane and has him released.
[01:05.000 --> 01:10.000]  And the Vatican has released Pope Francis' encyclical on climate change and had the
[01:10.000 --> 01:15.000]  following to say, quote, A very solid scientific consensus indicates that we are presently
[01:15.000 --> 01:18.000]  witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system.
[01:18.000 --> 01:23.000]  A number of scientific studies indicate that most global warming in recent decades is due
[01:23.000 --> 01:27.000]  to the great concentration of greenhouse gases released mainly as a result of human activity.
[01:27.000 --> 01:31.000]  The exploitation of the planet has already exceeded the acceptable limits and we still
[01:31.000 --> 01:33.000]  have not solved the problem of poverty.
[01:33.000 --> 01:36.000]  We need to strengthen the conviction that we are one single human family.
[01:36.000 --> 01:40.000]  We are not faced with two separate crises, one environmental and the other social, but
[01:40.000 --> 01:44.000]  rather one complex crisis, which is both social and environmental.
[01:44.000 --> 01:49.000]  The idea of infinite or unlimited growth, which proves so attractive to economists,
[01:49.000 --> 01:53.000]  financiers and experts in technology, is based on the line that there is an infinite supply
[01:53.000 --> 01:58.000]  of the Earth's goods and this leads to the planet being squeezed, dried at every limit.
[01:58.000 --> 02:02.000]  Nobody is suggesting we return to the Stone Age, but we do need to slow down and look
[02:02.000 --> 02:04.000]  at reality in a different way.
[02:04.000 --> 02:08.000]  We need to reject a magical conception of the market, which would suggest that the problems
[02:08.000 --> 02:13.000]  can be solved simply by an increase in the profits of companies or individuals.
[02:13.000 --> 02:18.000]  The UN climate chief, Cristina Figueres, said that this clarion call should guide the world
[02:18.000 --> 02:23.000]  towards a strong and durable universal climate agreement in Paris at the end of this year.
[02:23.000 --> 02:27.000]  Coupled with the economic imperative, the moral imperative leaves no doubt that we must
[02:27.000 --> 02:29.000]  act on climate change now.
[02:29.000 --> 02:34.000]  Jim Yong Kim, the World Bank president, said that today's release should serve as a stark
[02:34.000 --> 02:37.000]  reminder on the intrinsic link between climate change and poverty.
[02:37.000 --> 02:42.000]  We must now seize the narrow window of opportunity and embark on ambitious actions and policies
[02:42.000 --> 02:46.000]  to help protect people and the environment.
[02:46.000 --> 02:49.000]  The Lone Star Lowdown is currently looking for sponsors, so if you have a product or
[02:49.000 --> 02:52.000]  a service that you'd like to advertise on the Lowdown, feel free to give us a call at
[02:52.000 --> 02:55.000]  210-863-5617.
[02:55.000 --> 03:23.000]  This has been your Lowdown for June 18, 2015.
[03:25.000 --> 03:30.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:30.000 --> 03:33.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:33.000 --> 03:36.000]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:36.000 --> 03:39.000]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:39.000 --> 03:42.000]  Okay, the bad boys are back.
[03:42.000 --> 03:44.000]  Randy Carlton, Wheelball Radio.
[03:44.000 --> 03:47.000]  I guess I'm down to bad boy now.
[03:47.000 --> 03:55.000]  On this Friday, the Juneteenth, 2015.
[03:55.000 --> 04:02.000]  150-year anniversary of Juneteenth, the Emancipation of the Slaves.
[04:02.000 --> 04:08.000]  Okay, I'm gonna start out with something I was talking about last night.
[04:08.000 --> 04:16.000]  So I'm actually gonna turn them on tonight, which I didn't last night, to my great embarrassment
[04:16.000 --> 04:18.000]  and grin.
[04:18.000 --> 04:23.000]  Okay, this time the phone lines are actually open and we will be taking your calls all
[04:23.000 --> 04:29.000]  night, but I'm gonna start talking about, start out by talking about this grand jury
[04:29.000 --> 04:31.000]  thing again.
[04:31.000 --> 04:38.000]  And the reason I want to go to this part is something that I'm trying to demonstrate
[04:38.000 --> 04:39.000]  to everybody.
[04:39.000 --> 04:45.000]  When we go to public officials and try to get them to do what they're supposed to do,
[04:45.000 --> 04:48.000]  they almost never do.
[04:48.000 --> 04:57.000]  And when they don't, we get frustrated, irritated, upset, feel mistreated and betrayed.
[04:57.000 --> 04:59.000]  We do that.
[04:59.000 --> 05:02.000]  We should always have a plan.
[05:02.000 --> 05:09.000]  We are the masters, they are the servants, and we need to treat them like the servants.
[05:09.000 --> 05:18.000]  And when we ask, request that a servant do what he's required to do, if he fails to do
[05:18.000 --> 05:27.000]  what he's required to do, we as the master need to have some action to take to address
[05:27.000 --> 05:30.000]  the impropriety.
[05:30.000 --> 05:36.000]  And most of you who listen all the time knows that I have been filing some criminal charges
[05:36.000 --> 05:47.000]  with grand juries wherein the accusation accuses someone of committing a crime outside the
[05:47.000 --> 05:52.000]  county where the current grand jury sits.
[05:52.000 --> 05:57.000]  So it raises the question of grand jury venue.
[05:57.000 --> 06:04.000]  Well, I brought the code to the Tarrant County District Attorney and she seems to be the
[06:04.000 --> 06:11.000]  only prosecutor in Texas who actually reads the law and follows it.
[06:11.000 --> 06:16.000]  And the law in Texas says that when a prosecuting attorney is made known that a public official
[06:16.000 --> 06:20.000]  has violated the law relating to his office, he shall reduce complaint when information
[06:20.000 --> 06:22.000]  is submitted to the grand jury.
[06:22.000 --> 06:24.000]  It means no jurisdiction.
[06:24.000 --> 06:33.000]  But I told the district attorney that I was going directly to the grand jury and I didn't
[06:33.000 --> 06:35.000]  want any interference.
[06:35.000 --> 06:40.000]  And what I was taking to the grand jury was a complaint against the district attorney
[06:40.000 --> 06:43.000]  in another county for interfering with me getting to the grand jury.
[06:43.000 --> 06:46.000]  It was sort of a case in point.
[06:46.000 --> 06:50.000]  So she stood aside the way the law required her to do.
[06:50.000 --> 06:59.000]  I gave them to the grand jury and I believe that the grand jury did not ask the district
[06:59.000 --> 07:03.000]  attorney for legal advice concerning these complaints.
[07:03.000 --> 07:10.000]  As a matter of fact, I hope that the grand jury didn't because this is the letter that
[07:10.000 --> 07:13.000]  I got from the foreman of the grand jury.
[07:13.000 --> 07:18.000]  We, grand jury A of Tarrant County, Texas, have received the documents you sent for our
[07:18.000 --> 07:20.000]  consideration by this grand jury.
[07:20.000 --> 07:25.000]  As servants of the citizens of Tarrant County, we give all correspondence and complaints
[07:25.000 --> 07:28.000]  sent to us our utmost attention.
[07:28.000 --> 07:34.000]  Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 20.09 states that the grand jury shall inquire into
[07:34.000 --> 07:39.000]  all offenses liable to indictment of which any member may have knowledge or of which
[07:39.000 --> 07:47.000]  they shall be informed by the attorney representing the state or any credible person.
[07:47.000 --> 07:49.000]  And not that credible person.
[07:49.000 --> 07:57.000]  Upon consideration of your material you provided, we do not find a Tarrant County offense liable
[07:57.000 --> 08:01.000]  to indictment under the Texas law.
[08:01.000 --> 08:04.000]  Well, is that a fact?
[08:04.000 --> 08:06.000]  Jack.
[08:06.000 --> 08:17.000]  So they just passed on my complaints because they did not find a Tarrant County offense
[08:17.000 --> 08:20.000]  liable to indictment.
[08:20.000 --> 08:30.000]  Now, quoted the statute, the grand jury shall inquire into this liable to indictment of which
[08:30.000 --> 08:31.000]  any member may have knowledge.
[08:31.000 --> 08:41.000]  Now, what part of all offenses was hard for the foreman to understand?
[08:41.000 --> 08:46.000]  It did not say all Tarrant County offenses.
[08:46.000 --> 08:54.000]  It did not say all offenses within the defined venue or jurisdiction of the office.
[08:54.000 --> 08:59.000]  It said all offenses.
[08:59.000 --> 09:03.000]  So what do we do?
[09:03.000 --> 09:08.000]  We file criminal charges against the grand jury.
[09:08.000 --> 09:10.000]  I don't know if the grand jury had anything to do with this.
[09:10.000 --> 09:13.000]  I do know that the foreman signed this letter.
[09:13.000 --> 09:16.000]  So beyond that I don't know anything.
[09:16.000 --> 09:21.000]  So I'll file criminal charges against the foreman of the grand jury for official oppression
[09:21.000 --> 09:25.000]  39.03 penal code by misfeasance in office.
[09:25.000 --> 09:30.000]  Misfeasance in that he failed to perform a duty he was required to perform and in the
[09:30.000 --> 09:33.000]  process denied meaningful free access to or enjoyment of the right.
[09:33.000 --> 09:40.000]  And the right I was denied access to or enjoyment of was the right to the equal protection of
[09:40.000 --> 09:43.000]  laws.
[09:43.000 --> 09:48.000]  A police officer will very quickly tell you that he has no duty to protect you.
[09:48.000 --> 09:50.000]  Now, I agree.
[09:50.000 --> 09:52.000]  He does not.
[09:52.000 --> 10:00.000]  I don't need a police officer or a grand jury or a custom to protect me.
[10:00.000 --> 10:04.000]  I have the law for that.
[10:04.000 --> 10:13.000]  I as one of the masters with all the rest of you masters put legal prescription in place.
[10:13.000 --> 10:25.000]  We elected legislators and had those legislators enact a very comprehensive corpus juris.
[10:25.000 --> 10:29.000]  And it is that law that protects us.
[10:29.000 --> 10:32.000]  Our public officials merely enforce that law.
[10:32.000 --> 10:34.000]  When they enforce that law, we are protected.
[10:34.000 --> 10:38.000]  When they fail to enforce that law, we are denied in the protection.
[10:38.000 --> 10:42.000]  So I'll file against the foreman of the grand jury for that.
[10:42.000 --> 10:46.000]  And I also accuse him of shielding the accused from prosecution.
[10:46.000 --> 10:52.000]  And one of the complaints, his first degree fell in the aggravated assault because I was
[10:52.000 --> 10:55.000]  tossed out of the building to construct a gunpoint.
[10:55.000 --> 11:03.000]  And the way I read the Texas Penal Code, 2202B2A, if a person commits simple assault while
[11:03.000 --> 11:09.000]  prominently displaying a deadly weapon, that's a second degree felony in the state of Texas
[11:09.000 --> 11:17.000]  unless the person is a public official acting under the color, meaning pretty intense of
[11:17.000 --> 11:22.000]  an official capacity, in which case that's first degree felony in the state of Texas.
[11:22.000 --> 11:28.000]  And if you shield someone from prosecution, you're guilty of an offense one degree less
[11:28.000 --> 11:32.000]  than the one from which you shielded the person.
[11:32.000 --> 11:40.000]  So I'll charge the foreman of the grand jury, the criminal conspiracy, because we can accuse
[11:40.000 --> 11:49.000]  him of conspiring with all the other grand jury members, to commit classic misdemeanor
[11:49.000 --> 11:52.000]  and official misconduct, second degree felony shielded from prosecution.
[11:52.000 --> 11:54.000]  We'll see how he likes that one.
[11:54.000 --> 11:59.000]  We'll see if that helps him read the code a little more carefully.
[11:59.000 --> 12:01.000]  We are getting a bunch of calls right away.
[12:01.000 --> 12:05.000]  We're going to start out with Leslie in Pennsylvania.
[12:05.000 --> 12:07.000]  Hello, Ms. Leslie.
[12:07.000 --> 12:09.000]  Hi there, how are you?
[12:09.000 --> 12:11.000]  I am good.
[12:11.000 --> 12:15.000]  You sent me some interesting Skypes earlier today.
[12:15.000 --> 12:20.000]  Would you explain to everyone what that was all about?
[12:20.000 --> 12:26.000]  Okay, it seems like I was talking to my girlfriend, and she had been talking to her attorney,
[12:26.000 --> 12:30.000]  and he says, I saw a foreclosure case got thrown out in five minutes.
[12:30.000 --> 12:33.000]  And I asked, I said, well, what did he say happened?
[12:33.000 --> 12:46.000]  He said, well, the defense lawyer got the banker, a witness, on the thing to question him,
[12:46.000 --> 12:54.000]  got him sworn in, and asked him point blank, did you lie to us now, or did you lie to the
[12:54.000 --> 13:04.000]  SEC when you said that you gave my client a loan?
[13:04.000 --> 13:10.000]  If they had provided money for the loan, it would be registered with the Securities and
[13:10.000 --> 13:12.000]  Exchange Commission.
[13:12.000 --> 13:17.000]  But of course, we know they don't give any money for the loan, most of them anyway.
[13:17.000 --> 13:21.000]  They're all table funded, right?
[13:21.000 --> 13:25.000]  You there?
[13:25.000 --> 13:30.000]  They're table funded by Special Purpose Vehicle.
[13:30.000 --> 13:36.000]  And this is how they got into all of this money laundering thing, because it looks like the
[13:36.000 --> 13:46.000]  lender's pulling that money from his fractional reserve account, when in fact, he's getting
[13:46.000 --> 13:51.000]  the money from Special Purpose Vehicle, and we don't know where that money's coming from.
[13:51.000 --> 13:58.000]  With Washington Mutual, it turned out to be coming from Mexican and Colombian drug cartels.
[13:58.000 --> 14:05.000]  Okay, so yeah, they table fund, we don't know where the funds come from.
[14:05.000 --> 14:08.000]  Whoa, you still there, Leslie?
[14:08.000 --> 14:13.000]  Ah, somehow you got muted.
[14:13.000 --> 14:15.000]  Okay, you there, Leslie?
[14:15.000 --> 14:17.000]  Hello?
[14:17.000 --> 14:18.000]  Hello, there you go.
[14:18.000 --> 14:20.000]  Somehow you got muted.
[14:20.000 --> 14:22.000]  I'm not sure how that happened.
[14:22.000 --> 14:25.000]  Okay.
[14:25.000 --> 14:28.000]  Anyway, they don't know where the money's coming from.
[14:28.000 --> 14:30.000]  It's not recorded on the SEC.
[14:30.000 --> 14:38.000]  And the money thing, when you have a, the mortgage itself is only evidence of a lien.
[14:38.000 --> 14:40.000]  It is not the lien.
[14:40.000 --> 14:47.000]  They have to file a UCC-1 lien, and because it costs $100 a shot, they don't file them.
[14:47.000 --> 14:51.000]  Okay, let's back up a little bit.
[14:51.000 --> 14:55.000]  That's right and it's not right.
[14:55.000 --> 14:59.000]  It's right that it's not the lien.
[14:59.000 --> 15:03.000]  The lien is something that has no physical existence.
[15:03.000 --> 15:08.000]  The lien exists as a matter of law.
[15:08.000 --> 15:13.000]  When a deed of trust is filed in the record,
[15:13.000 --> 15:24.000]  that deed of trust is evidence of the lien that was created as a matter of law on an agreement to pay.
[15:24.000 --> 15:26.000]  Does that make sense?
[15:26.000 --> 15:28.000]  Yes.
[15:28.000 --> 15:29.000]  Okay.
[15:29.000 --> 15:37.000]  But they're also saying the UCC-1 lien is important too, more so than the mortgage.
[15:37.000 --> 15:44.000]  Okay, it was my understanding that a UCC-1 was only required if this were a commercial loan.
[15:44.000 --> 15:52.000]  Is that not correct?
[15:52.000 --> 15:54.000]  Yeah, I don't know.
[15:54.000 --> 15:57.000]  All he said is he's just having...
[15:57.000 --> 16:03.000]  Evidently, someone had done some work on their house and filed a UCC-1 lien.
[16:03.000 --> 16:06.000]  It was a neighbor had done some work over at the farm.
[16:06.000 --> 16:09.000]  So they filed a UCC-1 lien.
[16:09.000 --> 16:15.000]  They filed a material man's or mechanic's lien?
[16:15.000 --> 16:17.000]  I'm not sure.
[16:17.000 --> 16:21.000]  It was just a UCC-1 lien on the property.
[16:21.000 --> 16:27.000]  And the lawyer said that that's going to be put in to the...
[16:27.000 --> 16:32.000]  he's going to bring it up to the attention because that gets first...
[16:32.000 --> 16:35.000]  It's in first position.
[16:35.000 --> 16:37.000]  Yeah.
[16:37.000 --> 16:43.000]  If the deed of trust was not valid, then that becomes first position.
[16:43.000 --> 16:46.000]  Hang on, Randy Kelton, we'll go to our radio.
[16:46.000 --> 16:50.000]  I'll call the number, 512-646-1984.
[16:50.000 --> 17:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:00.000 --> 17:04.000]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved.
[17:04.000 --> 17:06.000]  Except in the area of nutrition.
[17:06.000 --> 17:09.000]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[17:09.000 --> 17:11.000]  And it's time we changed all that.
[17:11.000 --> 17:17.000]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:17.000 --> 17:22.000]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated,
[17:22.000 --> 17:25.000]  Young Jevity can provide the nutrients you need.
[17:25.000 --> 17:31.000]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which we reject.
[17:31.000 --> 17:36.000]  We have come to trust Young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor,
[17:36.000 --> 17:40.000]  along with Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:40.000 --> 17:47.000]  When you order from LogosRadioNetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support quality radio.
[17:47.000 --> 17:51.000]  As you realize the benefits of Young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.000 --> 17:58.000]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and increase your income.
[17:58.000 --> 18:00.000]  Order now.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:15.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:25.000]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[18:25.000 --> 18:27.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:27.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:47.000]  For more information, please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000]  Or email MichaelMears at Yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 18:52.000]  That's RuleOfLawRadio.com.
[18:52.000 --> 18:57.000]  Or email M-I-C-H-A-E-L-M-I-R-R-A-S at Yahoo.com.
[18:57.000 --> 19:00.000]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:02.000 --> 19:05.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network.
[19:05.000 --> 19:33.000]  LogosRadioNetwork.com
[19:33.000 --> 19:35.000]  Okay, we are back.
[19:35.000 --> 19:41.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Ms. Leslie in Pennsylvania.
[19:41.000 --> 19:48.000]  Okay, are you, do you know what kind of a mortgage this was?
[19:48.000 --> 19:52.000]  Was it a commercial or a residential?
[19:52.000 --> 19:54.000]  It was a residential.
[19:54.000 --> 19:57.000]  Oh, you mean the one that they threw out?
[19:57.000 --> 19:58.000]  I don't know.
[19:58.000 --> 19:59.000]  Yes.
[19:59.000 --> 20:06.000]  If it were a commercial, go ahead.
[20:06.000 --> 20:11.000]  It's my understanding that it was a residential because of where it was.
[20:11.000 --> 20:13.000]  There's not that much over there.
[20:13.000 --> 20:17.000]  It's all, you know, what would you call them?
[20:17.000 --> 20:21.000]  Family formed type of things, you know.
[20:21.000 --> 20:31.000]  That raises an interesting question, one that I have not researched or even considered.
[20:31.000 --> 20:41.000]  The requirement of the bank to file a real estate mortgage with the SEC.
[20:41.000 --> 20:50.000]  Now, as far as I know, a real estate mortgage is not in and of itself a security.
[20:50.000 --> 20:59.000]  I mean, they may securitize it and it becomes a security, but it's not necessarily a security.
[20:59.000 --> 21:00.000]  Right.
[21:00.000 --> 21:06.000]  If they provided the money for it, they would have to have disclosed it.
[21:06.000 --> 21:09.000]  I don't know that.
[21:09.000 --> 21:14.000]  Disclosed perhaps, but that's a different issue.
[21:14.000 --> 21:19.000]  The filing with the SEC, that's where I'm trying to get to.
[21:19.000 --> 21:21.000]  I mean, it's something I'm not sure about.
[21:21.000 --> 21:28.000]  I'm certain that if they securitize the note and sold off the income stream,
[21:28.000 --> 21:33.000]  then they would have to do, I would expect they would have to do a filing.
[21:33.000 --> 21:40.000]  I don't know for certain because the SEC is not one of my areas of research.
[21:40.000 --> 21:44.000]  I have researched it, but not in this capacity.
[21:44.000 --> 21:51.000]  So if we can find the requirement for filing with the SEC,
[21:51.000 --> 21:56.000]  and then we can show that it was not filed with the SEC,
[21:56.000 --> 22:03.000]  then that's a reasonable probable cause to believe that no note ever existed.
[22:03.000 --> 22:10.000]  Or the bank failed to file a law, in which case the deed of trust no longer exists.
[22:10.000 --> 22:15.000]  Well, the mortgage got thrown out. The case got thrown right out of court.
[22:15.000 --> 22:20.000]  I'd like to see, can you get specifics on the case?
[22:20.000 --> 22:23.000]  I will try. I will try.
[22:23.000 --> 22:28.000]  Sometimes we get this information, and then when we go back and check,
[22:28.000 --> 22:35.000]  there turns out to be stuff that the person who reported the issue wasn't aware of.
[22:35.000 --> 22:37.000]  Right.
[22:37.000 --> 22:42.000]  So we want to make sure we got good information because this sounds really good.
[22:42.000 --> 22:45.000]  Yeah, that's what I thought.
[22:45.000 --> 22:48.000]  I got an order from the foreclosure court.
[22:48.000 --> 22:52.000]  They said that they're overruling my preliminary objections,
[22:52.000 --> 22:58.000]  and I have to file a response by the 26th, or actually by the 29th,
[22:58.000 --> 23:03.000]  but I plan to mail it on the 26th so it would be there in time.
[23:03.000 --> 23:07.000]  Okay, this has to do with your dismissal.
[23:07.000 --> 23:10.000]  With my foreclosure, yes.
[23:10.000 --> 23:21.000]  Yes, where you rescinded the note, and the bank failed to return all your funds to you,
[23:21.000 --> 23:27.000]  so you sued to enforce rescindion.
[23:27.000 --> 23:29.000]  Not really.
[23:29.000 --> 23:37.000]  I filed a quiet title against the original lender, and they came in with a forged assignment of mortgage.
[23:37.000 --> 23:43.000]  And they dismissed the case, and I went to the court of appeals,
[23:43.000 --> 23:48.000]  and they said that they couldn't give a summary judgment, but they could dismiss the case
[23:48.000 --> 23:50.000]  because they had done both.
[23:50.000 --> 23:54.000]  They dismissed the case and gave summary judgment to the bank.
[23:54.000 --> 23:56.000]  Can't do that.
[23:56.000 --> 23:59.000]  A dismissal?
[23:59.000 --> 24:03.000]  I thought they dismissed it for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
[24:03.000 --> 24:04.000]  Right.
[24:04.000 --> 24:08.000]  And you said if you dismiss it for that, you can't make a summary judgment.
[24:08.000 --> 24:09.000]  Right.
[24:09.000 --> 24:13.000]  Nothing the judge did is void.
[24:13.000 --> 24:16.000]  I mean, it survives.
[24:16.000 --> 24:18.000]  Everything's void.
[24:18.000 --> 24:22.000]  If you didn't have subject matter jurisdiction on the first day,
[24:22.000 --> 24:25.000]  you never had subject matter jurisdiction.
[24:25.000 --> 24:29.000]  And these lawyers know that.
[24:29.000 --> 24:30.000]  Right.
[24:30.000 --> 24:35.000]  Now, before that came down, they filed foreclosure against me,
[24:35.000 --> 24:39.000]  and I filed a preliminary objection.
[24:39.000 --> 24:52.000]  But I already had, if you recall, a court decision that listed the chain of title to the mortgage
[24:52.000 --> 24:59.000]  so that I could prove that the assignment is a forgery.
[24:59.000 --> 25:07.000]  So do you have, I'm sure you have statute in Pennsylvania that makes it a criminal act
[25:07.000 --> 25:11.000]  to file a fraudulent document in the public record.
[25:11.000 --> 25:12.000]  You got it.
[25:12.000 --> 25:16.000]  So I filed RICO charges Tuesday.
[25:16.000 --> 25:26.000]  In the RICO case, did you move for preliminary restraining order to restrain the lender from foreclosing?
[25:26.000 --> 25:32.000]  Not yet, because they have to get a court order to foreclose here in Pennsylvania.
[25:32.000 --> 25:34.000]  Oh, okay.
[25:34.000 --> 25:37.000]  I just have to file an answer.
[25:37.000 --> 25:49.000]  And as part of my answer, I put in counterclaims for a malicious civil procedure proceeding
[25:49.000 --> 25:54.000]  and an additional note that further counterclaims are,
[25:54.000 --> 25:58.000]  and I listed all of the counts that I put in the RICO suit,
[25:58.000 --> 26:04.000]  and they're being filed in the federal court with a jury trial, period.
[26:04.000 --> 26:07.000]  And I'm going to attach that to my answer.
[26:07.000 --> 26:13.000]  That on its own will probably keep them from trying to pursue foreclosure.
[26:13.000 --> 26:17.000]  So you may not need the restraining order.
[26:17.000 --> 26:19.000]  No, no.
[26:19.000 --> 26:26.000]  They're going to take one look at that and they're going to get heartburn.
[26:26.000 --> 26:27.000]  Very good.
[26:27.000 --> 26:31.000]  You sent it to me, but I haven't had time to read it yet.
[26:31.000 --> 26:36.000]  It kind of got roped into flipping a property.
[26:36.000 --> 26:39.000]  Real work.
[26:39.000 --> 26:42.000]  And I really hate having to do real work.
[26:42.000 --> 26:44.000]  I know.
[26:44.000 --> 26:46.000]  My son's going through that.
[26:46.000 --> 26:51.000]  He bought a house for $7,000, and he's doing cash only.
[26:51.000 --> 26:56.000]  He put a new roof on, put a new side wall on, you know, all that kind of stuff.
[26:56.000 --> 27:02.000]  But in the end, he'll have a house that he'll be paid for because he's paying as he goes.
[27:02.000 --> 27:03.000]  That'll be nice.
[27:03.000 --> 27:06.000]  I live in a house that's paid for.
[27:06.000 --> 27:11.000]  It's nice to...I don't have...I don't owe anybody.
[27:11.000 --> 27:12.000]  Yes.
[27:12.000 --> 27:20.000]  I do this show on mortgages and credit issues, and I don't have either one.
[27:20.000 --> 27:25.000]  Well, he'll be able to...this has four units in it so he can have a...
[27:25.000 --> 27:28.000]  You know, it'll be income for him.
[27:28.000 --> 27:37.000]  In addition, on the RICO suit, there is 17 different people besides Merz
[27:37.000 --> 27:46.000]  and the mortgage company because I filed against every attorney and the law firm
[27:46.000 --> 27:51.000]  that used that assignment of mortgage to enter either the quiet title
[27:51.000 --> 27:59.000]  or the foreclosure case in charge of each time they entered a document.
[27:59.000 --> 28:04.000]  This could get really interesting because this is the kind of thing
[28:04.000 --> 28:12.000]  that seldom gets done where someone goes and takes them apart on a letter of law.
[28:12.000 --> 28:17.000]  Not only that, but guess who the judge is that we got assigned?
[28:17.000 --> 28:25.000]  The one that gave me the list of my assignments of mortgages,
[28:25.000 --> 28:31.000]  the title, the chain of title, the one that gave me the declaratory judgment.
[28:31.000 --> 28:42.000]  So he's already essentially ruled in your favor that the documents were fraudulent.
[28:42.000 --> 28:44.000]  Well, he hasn't said they're fraudulent.
[28:44.000 --> 28:49.000]  He said what they were supposed to say because he ruled that before there was an assignment of mortgage
[28:49.000 --> 28:52.000]  and they came and ignored him and he did.
[28:52.000 --> 28:56.000]  Okay, what specifically did he rule again?
[28:56.000 --> 29:02.000]  He ruled that the mortgage itself was assigned from the original lender
[29:02.000 --> 29:07.000]  to the next person and then to again and then again.
[29:07.000 --> 29:19.000]  And now it's been assigned after that, but it went from A to D instead of C to D.
[29:19.000 --> 29:20.000]  You know what I mean?
[29:20.000 --> 29:23.000]  It went through A and then it went to B and then it went to C.
[29:23.000 --> 29:29.000]  Instead of putting it from C to D, it went from A to D. So it's a fraud right there.
[29:29.000 --> 29:33.000]  Did he rule that it was fraud or just rule that it went from A to D?
[29:33.000 --> 29:46.000]  He ruled that the loan went from A to B on this date, B to C on this date, and C to D on this date.
[29:46.000 --> 29:47.000]  Okay, wait, wait, wait.
[29:47.000 --> 29:49.000]  Hold on, we're about to go to break.
[29:49.000 --> 29:51.000]  I tried to get it in, but we're out of time.
[29:51.000 --> 30:00.000]  Randy Kelton, Google Our Radio, we'll be right back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:06.000]  Drug smugglers have tried everything from submarines to catapults to get illegal drugs into the U.S.,
[30:06.000 --> 30:11.000]  but their most recent method was so ingenious it only cost them a quarter of shipment.
[30:11.000 --> 30:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back to tell you what it was.
[30:15.000 --> 30:17.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:17.000 --> 30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:21.000 --> 30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:26.000 --> 30:31.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:31.000 --> 30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[30:34.000 --> 30:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by Startpage.com,
[30:37.000 --> 30:41.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:41.000 --> 30:44.000]  Start over with Startpage.
[30:44.000 --> 30:49.000]  Mexican drug smugglers are always brainstorming new ways to outsmart the Border Patrol,
[30:49.000 --> 30:52.000]  but their recent exploits were the stuff of legend.
[30:52.000 --> 30:58.000]  The traffickers tunneled their way underground to 16-metered parking spaces in Nogales, Arizona,
[30:58.000 --> 31:00.000]  and cut careful rectangles in the pavement.
[31:00.000 --> 31:04.000]  U.S. accomplices then parked false bottom cars above the holes,
[31:04.000 --> 31:08.000]  fed the parking meter, and stuffed the cars with drugs from below.
[31:08.000 --> 31:14.000]  Once the pavement plugs were back in place, the vehicles would cruise quietly away with nobody the wiser.
[31:14.000 --> 31:18.000]  Eventually, diligent deputies detained the digging desperados,
[31:18.000 --> 31:20.000]  and that was the end of drive-through drugs.
[31:20.000 --> 31:25.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:50.000 --> 31:58.000]  The body, the nutrients it needs. Call 888-910-4367 and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[31:58.000 --> 32:01.000]  Only at NQSA.org.
[32:01.000 --> 32:05.000]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the rule of law traffic seminar.
[32:05.000 --> 32:08.000]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society,
[32:08.000 --> 32:10.000]  and if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:10.000 --> 32:13.000]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:13.000 --> 32:16.000]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:16.000 --> 32:20.000]  to act in our own private capacity, and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:20.000 --> 32:26.000]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:26.000 --> 32:29.000]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:29.000 --> 32:34.000]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available that will help you understand what due process is,
[32:34.000 --> 32:36.000]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:36.000 --> 32:41.000]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:41.000 --> 32:45.000]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book, The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.000 --> 32:51.000]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar, hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource material.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:55.000 --> 33:00.000]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society we all want and deserve.
[33:00.000 --> 33:12.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradionetwork.com.
[33:12.000 --> 33:31.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm gonna solve them, to the government them, prosecute them. Okay.
[33:31.000 --> 33:48.000]  Okay, we are back, going to Kelton with Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Leslie in Pennsylvania.
[33:48.000 --> 33:51.000]  Okay, Leslie, I kind of interrupted you there.
[33:51.000 --> 34:04.000]  Okay, now, this is the judge that when we went in and filed arrest and fellow violations, he gave us the complete chain of title to our mortgage.
[34:04.000 --> 34:17.000]  And since then, there's been another assignment to completely ignore everything that he said, and missed several.
[34:17.000 --> 34:22.000]  You know, just went from A to D without including in B and C.
[34:22.000 --> 34:40.000]  Oh, so this assignment is contrary to the specific ruling of the court on what the actual chain of title is, so that means this document is necessarily fraudulent.
[34:40.000 --> 34:42.000]  Yes.
[34:42.000 --> 34:49.000]  So have you filed a quiet action against this document?
[34:49.000 --> 34:52.000]  No, not yet.
[34:52.000 --> 35:01.000]  This might, okay, what was your original quiet title action was to quiet what document?
[35:01.000 --> 35:07.000]  The original mortgage against the original lender who had no interest in the mortgage and said so.
[35:07.000 --> 35:17.000]  Well, this particular document may give you an easier road to your outcome.
[35:17.000 --> 35:33.000]  If you move to have this document, move for quiet title as to this document, then no one is in a position to be able to make a claim against the property.
[35:33.000 --> 35:35.000]  Exactly.
[35:35.000 --> 35:38.000]  Well, there's two different things with that.
[35:38.000 --> 35:45.000]  I'm still waiting for the finish of the last quiet title because they haven't sent me the final order yet.
[35:45.000 --> 35:49.000]  That won't be coming for another two months maybe.
[35:49.000 --> 36:05.000]  Even if they do, if you file for quiet title on this document and move for summary judgment because the court order is clear and incontrovertible.
[36:05.000 --> 36:06.000]  Right.
[36:06.000 --> 36:16.000]  If they grant quiet title based on the ruling of a judge, then all this other becomes essentially moot.
[36:16.000 --> 36:20.000]  Right.
[36:20.000 --> 36:26.000]  Like I said, this is the same judge now that's been assigned to the RICO case, so this ought to be really interesting.
[36:26.000 --> 36:28.000]  Absolutely.
[36:28.000 --> 36:30.000]  It ought to be interesting.
[36:30.000 --> 36:40.000]  Almost certainly, there won't be any action toward foreclosure, so that's going to stop.
[36:40.000 --> 36:52.000]  And with the RICO suit, they're likely to be afraid to file any documentation in the record now because of the RICO suit.
[36:52.000 --> 36:59.000]  I'm trying to think what I would do if I were the lawyer on the other side.
[36:59.000 --> 37:02.000]  That's what I've been trying to figure out.
[37:02.000 --> 37:16.000]  I got this pro se from Hale who, because of the documents I filed in this case, he has named me in a RICO suit.
[37:16.000 --> 37:21.000]  As a matter of fact, everybody that stuck their head up got named.
[37:21.000 --> 37:26.000]  So what am I going to file next?
[37:26.000 --> 37:31.000]  And what do I have to know about the documents that I'm going to file?
[37:31.000 --> 37:40.000]  I would, well, certainly all of these lawyers at this point are disqualified.
[37:40.000 --> 37:41.000]  Right.
[37:41.000 --> 37:48.000]  They can't participate in a case with you because you have a RICO suit against them.
[37:48.000 --> 37:51.000]  So they're going to have to come up with another lawyer.
[37:51.000 --> 37:59.000]  And now this lawyer is going to look at this and say, well, this woman has beaten these guys up big time.
[37:59.000 --> 38:04.000]  Do I want my nose in the same trough with them?
[38:04.000 --> 38:05.000]  Right.
[38:05.000 --> 38:17.000]  My issue, my problem with these lawyers is either they are incredibly arrogant, incredibly stupid,
[38:17.000 --> 38:31.000]  or feel themselves bound to act in the interest of their client regardless of the consequences.
[38:31.000 --> 38:35.000]  I think that's the first one.
[38:35.000 --> 38:39.000]  They're arrogant because I'm stupid.
[38:39.000 --> 38:43.000]  I'd like to think that way.
[38:43.000 --> 38:50.000]  But all of these, in all of these cases where people are beating up the lawyers
[38:50.000 --> 38:55.000]  and the lawyers just keep coming, they don't back up, and I guess that's not true either
[38:55.000 --> 39:04.000]  because we do have a lot of lawyers that hit the road and the bank has to hire new lawyers.
[39:04.000 --> 39:09.000]  So it may well be that they say enough of this stuff.
[39:09.000 --> 39:11.000]  The lawyers, after all, are in business.
[39:11.000 --> 39:20.000]  What I'm trying to do here is sort out what information we may have available
[39:20.000 --> 39:26.000]  that will give us some clues as to the internal politics.
[39:26.000 --> 39:32.000]  It can't be a fly on the wall.
[39:32.000 --> 39:40.000]  But maybe by their behavior we can kind of figure out what the pressures are on these lawyers
[39:40.000 --> 39:44.000]  because you have to know they don't like this stuff.
[39:44.000 --> 39:46.000]  And this gets out of hand really quick.
[39:46.000 --> 39:53.000]  Deborah's helping a woman with a case on election fraud in Travis County.
[39:53.000 --> 39:59.000]  And she filed the election fraud case and the court just threw out everything,
[39:59.000 --> 40:06.000]  denied all her evidence, wouldn't let her get anything in, and then dismissed the case.
[40:06.000 --> 40:13.000]  And then the lawyers came back and filed a motion for sanctions,
[40:13.000 --> 40:17.000]  claimed that when she filed the case she didn't provide enough evidence,
[40:17.000 --> 40:22.000]  that she filed a no evidence case, and that's what they moved,
[40:22.000 --> 40:27.000]  they moved for summary judgment for no evidence, and it was dismissed for no evidence.
[40:27.000 --> 40:35.000]  Well, they filed for sanctions against her for forcing them to defend this allegedly frivolous suit.
[40:35.000 --> 40:41.000]  They, in order to support their sanctions, they called this woman to the stand,
[40:41.000 --> 40:51.000]  and she got the opportunity to put in all of the evidence that she didn't get to put in at the trial.
[40:51.000 --> 40:55.000]  And when she did that, she implicated these other lawyers,
[40:55.000 --> 41:01.000]  and the lawyers started calling each other because she had two lawyers for her
[41:01.000 --> 41:03.000]  that were also named in the sanctions order.
[41:03.000 --> 41:05.000]  So now the lawyer's on the dot.
[41:05.000 --> 41:12.000]  These lawyers started banging on each other, and holy mackerel, everything is unraveling.
[41:12.000 --> 41:24.000]  The last thing that came out is opposing counsel is examining one of the lawyers on the stand
[41:24.000 --> 41:32.000]  about how much he got paid, and the lawyer's being reticent about it,
[41:32.000 --> 41:42.000]  and the opposing counsel said, didn't you tell me that this client paid you $70,000,
[41:42.000 --> 41:47.000]  wrote a contract with you for $75,000?
[41:47.000 --> 41:55.000]  And the client's sitting over there thinking, there was never any such contract.
[41:55.000 --> 42:01.000]  He demanded $75,000 for his work, but there wasn't a contract to that effect.
[42:01.000 --> 42:07.000]  So where did this guy come up with that information?
[42:07.000 --> 42:13.000]  All of a sudden, all the garbage they were doing in the background,
[42:13.000 --> 42:16.000]  once it got hot for them, it began to come out.
[42:16.000 --> 42:19.000]  Lawyers are horrible witnesses.
[42:19.000 --> 42:24.000]  So these lawyers may see themselves getting in the same positions,
[42:24.000 --> 42:30.000]  that when somebody really fights them and really takes them to task,
[42:30.000 --> 42:34.000]  things have a way of coming apart on them.
[42:34.000 --> 42:36.000]  Yeah.
[42:36.000 --> 42:45.000]  I'm thinking about what you want to do to the incoming lawyer who represents the RICO case.
[42:45.000 --> 42:47.000]  Right.
[42:47.000 --> 42:51.000]  How do you handle him?
[42:51.000 --> 42:52.000]  Well, he's representing them.
[42:52.000 --> 42:55.000]  He's not a party to the assignment.
[42:55.000 --> 42:58.000]  He's a party only to representing them.
[42:58.000 --> 43:00.000]  Well, I'm talking about anybody who touches data,
[43:00.000 --> 43:04.000]  signs the mortgages and involved with murders, that's who's getting it.
[43:04.000 --> 43:14.000]  But if he makes a false statement to the court or presents a fraudulent document to the court,
[43:14.000 --> 43:20.000]  I am certain you have something in Pennsylvania similar to Santiago v. Mackey.
[43:20.000 --> 43:25.000]  And that's where Santiago presented a fraudulent document to the borrower,
[43:25.000 --> 43:30.000]  which was a copy of the original, and he claimed it was the original.
[43:30.000 --> 43:35.000]  He was sued for that, and the other side won.
[43:35.000 --> 43:37.000]  They won in the court of appeals.
[43:37.000 --> 43:42.000]  So presenting fraudulent documents is not a duty of a lawyer to its client.
[43:42.000 --> 43:43.000]  Exactly.
[43:43.000 --> 43:44.000]  See where I'm going?
[43:44.000 --> 43:46.000]  This guy could walk right into this.
[43:46.000 --> 43:49.000]  Hang on, Randy Shelton, Rue of Law Radio.
[43:49.000 --> 43:50.000]  We'll finish this up on the other side.
[43:50.000 --> 43:53.000]  We've got Terry, Max, Chris.
[43:53.000 --> 43:54.000]  I see you all there.
[43:54.000 --> 43:55.000]  Thank you, everybody.
[43:55.000 --> 44:02.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:02.000 --> 44:03.000]  Hello.
[44:03.000 --> 44:06.000]  My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com,
[44:06.000 --> 44:10.000]  and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[44:10.000 --> 44:14.000]  Sweet D, here in Austin, Texas, hiring Brave New Books and Chase Payne
[44:14.000 --> 44:18.000]  to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[44:18.000 --> 44:22.000]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[44:22.000 --> 44:24.000]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products,
[44:24.000 --> 44:28.000]  including our Australian Emu oil, lotion candles, olive oil soaps,
[44:28.000 --> 44:30.000]  and colloidal silver and gold.
[44:30.000 --> 44:37.000]  Call 512-264-4043, or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[44:37.000 --> 44:43.000]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[44:43.000 --> 44:47.000]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[44:47.000 --> 45:01.000]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[45:01.000 --> 45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[45:04.000 --> 45:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Juris Dictionary,
[45:07.000 --> 45:11.000]  the affordable, easy-to-understand, poor CD course
[45:11.000 --> 45:15.000]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[45:15.000 --> 45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[45:19.000 --> 45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[45:23.000 --> 45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Juris Dictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:49.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:49.000 --> 45:52.000]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[45:52.000 --> 46:02.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[46:02.000 --> 46:29.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:29.000 --> 46:34.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Leslie in Pennsylvania.
[46:34.000 --> 46:44.000]  And you know, Leslie, generally, I define a court case from an individual's perspective
[46:44.000 --> 46:50.000]  as a four-sided chessboard where you have your lawyer to your right,
[46:50.000 --> 46:54.000]  opposing counsel to your left, and the judge across from you.
[46:54.000 --> 46:58.000]  Opposing counsel and your counsel have a relationship.
[46:58.000 --> 47:03.000]  With each other, both of them have a relationship with the judge,
[47:03.000 --> 47:12.000]  and the only relationship you have on the board is between you and your attorney.
[47:12.000 --> 47:21.000]  RICO has it work as concerns relationships.
[47:21.000 --> 47:30.000]  Does each client, each defendant have to hire their own attorney?
[47:30.000 --> 47:32.000]  No, no.
[47:32.000 --> 47:37.000]  I would think that each law firm would have to hire their own attorney,
[47:37.000 --> 47:41.000]  and all of the people underneath them would share them, I guess.
[47:41.000 --> 47:47.000]  Well, what I'm thinking is if you're an attorney here and you're working for this law firm,
[47:47.000 --> 47:55.000]  this is a law firm, so you've got to know these chumps are throwing your behind under the bus in a heartbeat.
[47:55.000 --> 47:56.000]  Yeah.
[47:56.000 --> 48:06.000]  So is this guy going to be comfortable with letting the law firm represent his position or his rights,
[48:06.000 --> 48:14.000]  because he may want to claim that he acted under the direction of the law firm.
[48:14.000 --> 48:18.000]  Good faith relies on competent authority.
[48:18.000 --> 48:26.000]  But if the one lawyer is representing him and the firm, he's not going to be able to do that.
[48:26.000 --> 48:30.000]  What I'm thinking about are relationships.
[48:30.000 --> 48:33.000]  How does a RICO suit affect relationships?
[48:33.000 --> 48:38.000]  Because this changes everything.
[48:38.000 --> 48:39.000]  Oh, yeah.
[48:39.000 --> 48:47.000]  I once had a federal judge say that filing a RICO suit is like dropping an atomic bomb.
[48:47.000 --> 48:52.000]  It changes the whole landscape.
[48:52.000 --> 49:02.000]  So they almost certainly will find a lawyer who understands the politics of a RICO suit,
[49:02.000 --> 49:05.000]  because the law is not the most important thing.
[49:05.000 --> 49:09.000]  The most important thing is politics.
[49:09.000 --> 49:19.000]  And you're kind of backwards from a class action.
[49:19.000 --> 49:27.000]  See, in a class action, the lawyers on the other side will go in and try to break apart the class
[49:27.000 --> 49:34.000]  and try to make a deal with one of the members of the class and get that member of the class to turn on the class.
[49:34.000 --> 49:38.000]  And they break up the class action that way.
[49:38.000 --> 49:45.000]  Well, in the RICO, you've essentially did a backwards filing of the class action.
[49:45.000 --> 49:49.000]  You got all of these litigants on the other side.
[49:49.000 --> 49:53.000]  A good chance you could turn them on one another.
[49:53.000 --> 49:56.000]  Yeah, that's what I was figuring.
[49:56.000 --> 49:59.000]  That's what I was figuring.
[49:59.000 --> 50:09.000]  Almost certainly, because it's what you're claiming is so much more threatening than just a civil lawsuit.
[50:09.000 --> 50:16.000]  I mean, they're all going to have errors and omissions policies that will help them with this to pay that off.
[50:16.000 --> 50:26.000]  But prison time, the kinds of claims you're making are the kinds of claims that dissolve bar cards.
[50:26.000 --> 50:28.000]  Yeah.
[50:28.000 --> 50:35.000]  And lawyers being what they are, they're likely to, they're like a pool full of sharks.
[50:35.000 --> 50:39.000]  They're likely to turn on each other.
[50:39.000 --> 50:43.000]  I love it.
[50:43.000 --> 50:53.000]  And it's our job when we work one of these is not to just think how can we win on our claims,
[50:53.000 --> 50:58.000]  but how can we beat the defendants?
[50:58.000 --> 51:01.000]  How can we get the defendants to turn on each other?
[51:01.000 --> 51:04.000]  How can we get them to trip up?
[51:04.000 --> 51:11.000]  And when you've got a bunch of them, nobody's, they're all lawyers, nobody's going to control them.
[51:11.000 --> 51:15.000]  So you have a fertile field here.
[51:15.000 --> 51:19.000]  Okay, we do need to move on.
[51:19.000 --> 51:24.000]  Thank you very much, Leslie, and keep us up to speed on how this goes.
[51:24.000 --> 51:28.000]  You're going at the top of my hero board.
[51:28.000 --> 51:30.000]  Thank you.
[51:30.000 --> 51:31.000]  Okay.
[51:31.000 --> 51:33.000]  Thank you, Ms. Leslie.
[51:33.000 --> 51:34.000]  Go ahead.
[51:34.000 --> 51:35.000]  Okay, bye-bye.
[51:35.000 --> 51:37.000]  Okay, bye-bye, Ms. Leslie.
[51:37.000 --> 51:40.000]  Okay, now we're going to go to Terry in Michigan.
[51:40.000 --> 51:41.000]  Hello, Terry.
[51:41.000 --> 51:43.000]  Yeah, good evening.
[51:43.000 --> 51:46.000]  Randy, it's Terry from Missouri.
[51:46.000 --> 51:50.000]  Missouri, okay, I've got an EMI here on my board.
[51:50.000 --> 51:54.000]  Okay, how is your case going?
[51:54.000 --> 51:58.000]  Give us a brief synopsis, what it is, where you're at.
[51:58.000 --> 52:05.000]  Yeah, right now, and after discussing this briefly with a criminal defense attorney,
[52:05.000 --> 52:10.000]  I brought in all the motions and everything has transpired.
[52:10.000 --> 52:17.000]  And she cannot believe that this judge has allowed this lawyer to get by
[52:17.000 --> 52:21.000]  with all the conduct that she's accomplished.
[52:21.000 --> 52:22.000]  Also, I-
[52:22.000 --> 52:29.000]  Okay, wait a minute, hold on, this was a FDCPA or FCRA suit?
[52:29.000 --> 52:32.000]  No, an FCRA suit.
[52:32.000 --> 52:39.000]  Okay, and the judge recently dismissed without prejudice?
[52:39.000 --> 52:40.000]  Yes.
[52:40.000 --> 52:41.000]  Or with prejudice?
[52:41.000 --> 52:42.000]  All my-
[52:42.000 --> 52:43.000]  Okay, without prejudice?
[52:43.000 --> 52:44.000]  Yes.
[52:44.000 --> 52:50.000]  Okay, so this is where we're at, now you're going to the shenanigans.
[52:50.000 --> 52:59.000]  Yes, and one of his earlier orders, Randy, he combined six motions.
[52:59.000 --> 53:03.000]  All of those motions had conflicts of interest.
[53:03.000 --> 53:11.000]  The only rule that he could have consolidated under is if they had commonality,
[53:11.000 --> 53:15.000]  and that court rule is 42A, and she agreed with me,
[53:15.000 --> 53:22.000]  he had absolutely no discretion whatsoever to consolidate these motions.
[53:22.000 --> 53:28.000]  And the reason I see that he did it is so that he wouldn't have to rule against this law firm
[53:28.000 --> 53:33.000]  and these multitude of banks on a default judgment that I filed
[53:33.000 --> 53:44.000]  based on all the discovery abuses that this law firm had filed against that I caught him at.
[53:44.000 --> 53:48.000]  And so we had this oral argument, nothing was discussed,
[53:48.000 --> 53:54.000]  it was nothing more than a complaint session against me, nothing came out of that.
[53:54.000 --> 54:02.000]  They ruled against me even though I had evidence compiled to the moon
[54:02.000 --> 54:07.000]  with four and a half years of fraudulent credit card entries,
[54:07.000 --> 54:16.000]  and the list kind of went on from there, and I think I had scanned to you earlier this week.
[54:16.000 --> 54:23.000]  The reason they're pulling all this, Randy, is this is not just some simple little fair credit reporting act case.
[54:23.000 --> 54:31.000]  I stumbled into something that's going to prove a tremendous amount of fraud against this outfit
[54:31.000 --> 54:34.000]  that's issuing these credit cards.
[54:34.000 --> 54:40.000]  On page one of that credit card application that I scanned you,
[54:40.000 --> 54:44.000]  it says right there, middle ways on page one, it says,
[54:44.000 --> 54:56.000]  I, we, here and after, refer to as I, hereby apply to Central Trust Bank issuing bank Jefferson City, Missouri, for a credit card account.
[54:56.000 --> 55:04.000]  Well, I have a 147-page affidavit from the Missouri Secretary of State that absolutely and unequivocally said,
[55:04.000 --> 55:12.000]  there's no such entity filed with the Missouri Secretary of State by the name of Central Trust Bank.
[55:12.000 --> 55:17.000]  Then when you go to page seven of the credit card application,
[55:17.000 --> 55:26.000]  it then says on the cardholder agreement, the MasterCard Visa cards here and after called card enclosed herein
[55:26.000 --> 55:33.000]  is issued by the Central Trust Bank, which does exist.
[55:33.000 --> 55:39.000]  Furthermore, I had a subpoena sent to the law firm. The judge denied it.
[55:39.000 --> 55:47.000]  He didn't have to answer that. I sent another to the Missouri Division of Finance or Stonewall and me.
[55:47.000 --> 55:55.000]  The lady refused to answer. So obviously, what's that evidence of, Randy?
[55:55.000 --> 56:00.000]  Collusion, but do you have an open records?
[56:00.000 --> 56:08.000]  Okay, when you sent to this agency, did you send it in the form of discovery or open records?
[56:08.000 --> 56:16.000]  Well, it was a federal subpoena wanting data on that company called Central Trust Bank.
[56:16.000 --> 56:22.000]  She won't answer. But just recently, I sent her an open records request on the same entity,
[56:22.000 --> 56:25.000]  and we'll see what she does with that.
[56:25.000 --> 56:35.000]  That's a good idea because if it's under subpoena and the judge is crooked, then he won't enforce the subpoena.
[56:35.000 --> 56:39.000]  But if it's under open records, that's a whole other animal.
[56:39.000 --> 56:44.000]  Yes, sir. I know. I finally figured that out. I did that. It's on its way.
[56:44.000 --> 56:48.000]  And she has, I believe, 31 days to answer that. If she doesn't, I'm going to take her down there
[56:48.000 --> 56:53.000]  in the little circuit court and suit of socks off of her and get that data that I need.
[56:53.000 --> 57:01.000]  No, no, wait. Back up. Back up. If your open records act, is this a state agency or a federal agency?
[57:01.000 --> 57:03.000]  State agency.
[57:03.000 --> 57:18.000]  Okay. The open records act in Texas is not a civil statute. It's a criminal statute. Read yours.
[57:18.000 --> 57:25.000]  I bet it's the same way. And in Texas, a violation of the acts of Class A misdemeanor,
[57:25.000 --> 57:33.000]  up to a $10,000 fine and a year in jail, next thing to a felony.
[57:33.000 --> 57:37.000]  You're right. I forgot about that. Yes.
[57:37.000 --> 57:47.000]  The first thing you do, I gave one to a JP's office recently. The woman was really snotty with me.
[57:47.000 --> 57:50.000]  And I wanted a copy of it. I don't think we can make copies.
[57:50.000 --> 57:55.000]  I think you can make copies. You might want to go ask the judge about that.
[57:55.000 --> 57:59.000]  Well, she stumbled around back there for a while and finally brought me a copy.
[57:59.000 --> 58:04.000]  Well, in accordance with policy, we're going to send this to the DA's office.
[58:04.000 --> 58:12.000]  I said, well, I really don't care what you do with it, but you need to understand that you have 15 days
[58:12.000 --> 58:20.000]  to respond to this. I will not be understanding. I will not be reasonable.
[58:20.000 --> 58:27.000]  If that DA drags his feet on the 16th day, I go to the grand jury. Do we understand each other?
[58:27.000 --> 58:29.000]  Yes, Mr. Kelton.
[58:29.000 --> 58:35.000]  Oh, that was so much fun.
[58:35.000 --> 58:43.000]  Okay. Hang on. We're about to go to break. Randy Kelton, we're on our radio. Our call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:43.000 --> 58:46.000]  Give us a call. We'll be taking your calls all night.
[58:46.000 --> 58:50.000]  Chris, hang on. I'm looking forward to talking to you. We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 59:01.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  The New Testament Recovery Version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:11.000]  It's an accurate translation, and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God
[59:11.000 --> 59:13.000]  and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.000 --> 59:24.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation,
[59:24.000 --> 59:28.000]  growing in Christ, and how to build up the Church.
[59:28.000 --> 59:34.000]  To order your free New Testament Recovery Version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life,
[59:34.000 --> 59:45.000]  call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102. That's 888-551-0102.
[59:45.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:22.000]  It's a great time to learn about the alternatives.
[01:00:22.000 --> 01:00:28.000]  Markets for the 18th of June, 2015, opened up with gold at $1,201.54 an ounce.
[01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:30.000]  Silver, $16.18 an ounce.
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:33.000]  Texas crude, $59.92 a barrel.
[01:00:33.000 --> 01:00:42.000]  And bitcoin is currently sitting at about 250 U.S. currency.
[01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:44.000]  Today in history, Thursday, June 18, 1959.
[01:00:44.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Then Governor of Louisiana, Earl K. Long, is committed to a state mental hospital.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:53.000]  He responds by having the hospital's director, Jesse Bankson, fired
[01:00:53.000 --> 01:01:05.000]  and replaces him with the crony supporter, Bill Dodd, who proclaims Long perfectly sane and has him released.
[01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  And the Vatican has released Pope Francis' encyclical on climate change and had the following to say,
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:18.000]  quote, a very solid scientific consensus indicates that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system.
[01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  A number of scientific studies indicate that most global warming in recent decades is due to the great concentration of greenhouse gases
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:27.000]  released mainly as a result of human activity.
[01:01:27.000 --> 01:01:33.000]  The exploitation of the planet has already exceeded the acceptable limits and we still have not solved the problem of poverty.
[01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  We need to strengthen the conviction that we are one single human family.
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  We are not faced with two separate crises, one environmental and the other social, but rather one complex crisis, which is both social and environmental.
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:49.000]  The idea of infinite or unlimited growth, which proves so attractive to economists,
[01:01:49.000 --> 01:01:54.000]  financiers and experts in technology, is based on the line that there is an infinite supply of the Earth's goods.
[01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:58.000]  And this leads to the planet being squeezed, dried at every limit.
[01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:04.000]  Nobody is suggesting we return to the Stone Age, but we do need to slow down and look at reality in a different way.
[01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:07.000]  We need to reject a magical conception of the market,
[01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:13.000]  which would suggest that the problems can be solved simply by an increase in the profits of companies or individuals.
[01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:23.000]  The UN climate chief, Christina Figueres, said that this clarion call should guide the world towards a strong and durable universal climate agreement in Paris at the end of this year.
[01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:29.000]  Coupled with the economic imperative, the moral imperative leaves no doubt that we must act on climate change now.
[01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:37.000]  Jim Yong Kim, the World Bank president, said that today's release should serve as a stark reminder on the intrinsic link between climate change and poverty.
[01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:46.000]  We must now seize the narrow window of opportunity and embark on ambitious actions and policies to help protect people and the environment.
[01:02:46.000 --> 01:03:00.000]  He notes our lowdown is currently looking for sponsors, so if you have a product or a service that you'd like to advertise on the lowdown, feel free to give us a call at 210-863-5617. This has been your lowdown for June 18, 2015.
[01:03:16.000 --> 01:03:36.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to Terry in Michigan.
[01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:46.000]  So, we're talking about open records as a criminal statute.
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:04:00.000]  If you can get this agency not to respond, then they may still consider this to be relevant to a court case.
[01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:20.000]  It's in a court case under subpoena, if they're subpoenaed to produce something and they produce it, the procedure is you have to go to the court and get the court to order the production, and they probably figure that the court won't order them to do anything they don't want to do.
[01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:36.000]  But when you bushwhack them with a set of criminal complaints, that should change the whole landscape. Just one thing that's really politically motivated are governmental agencies.
[01:04:36.000 --> 01:04:39.000]  You're going to have a lot of fun with this, Terry.
[01:04:39.000 --> 01:05:02.000]  Well, I intend to. One of my questions is once I find out the truth, if this company absolutely, Randy, does not exist, this whole empire, this credit card manufacturing nonsense with these multiplicity of banks, they've been getting by with something for an awfully long time.
[01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:17.000]  And again, if this outfit doesn't exist, they're printing this stuff up on these papers, these applications that people are signing, and apparently I may be the only one that ever caught on to this, but that's a fraud.
[01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:27.000]  Have you checked to see if there are others similarly situated?
[01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:29.000]  You lost me.
[01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  You might look to see if you can find the name that doesn't exist or either name in the record as litigants where they're suing people on credit card issues, and then go in and look at their cases and see if you find a pattern of misbehavior.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  Right. I have not found any.
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:01.000]  Well, that's interesting.
[01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:04.000]  Yeah, and I have looked, Randy.
[01:06:04.000 --> 01:06:11.000]  So they've either sent cases and they closed the file and impounded the case that I don't know.
[01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:18.000]  But I've really when this finally blows up when I finally get that last little bit of evidence.
[01:06:18.000 --> 01:06:32.000]  They got a leg to stand on. Wait a minute. Hold on. They used a contract. Yes. And I don't somehow I don't think they wrote this contract up specifically for you.
[01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:34.000]  No, of course not.
[01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:39.000]  Does the original contract have a document number on it?
[01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:42.000]  Yes, it does.
[01:06:42.000 --> 01:06:55.000]  Have you subpoenaed that document number from the defendant or plaintiff, whichever he is from the other party?
[01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:57.000]  No, I have not.
[01:06:57.000 --> 01:07:01.000]  You might try that.
[01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:15.000]  Oh, you might. You might try looking at some cases and looking at the document numbers on the documents and see if they're different.
[01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  It's odd that you wouldn't find a similar case.
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:36.000]  You should expect that they pull out this document and even if it had a typo in it, even if the word the had been left out.
[01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:44.000]  And they didn't. It's unlikely that if they had it printed and started using it, it's unlikely they would catch it.
[01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:50.000]  And it would take somebody that's really legally savvy to catch something like that.
[01:07:50.000 --> 01:08:02.000]  Yeah. So it's unlikely that if they actually had a printed that they didn't use a lot of them.
[01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:14.000]  So anyway, you might look some more. That would be it might be a source of other litigants to help either get that.
[01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:21.000]  This goes to a question. What is it that you're trying to achieve by the litigation?
[01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:27.000]  Well, I was initially just wanting to get the case over with, Randy.
[01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  So you're not out to change the world and make everything right?
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:32.000]  No.
[01:08:32.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  So the reason I'm asking that, then you're likely to be willing to take a deal.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:45.000]  So have you, okay, are you the defendant in this case?
[01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:47.000]  No, I'm the plaintiff.
[01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:54.000]  Okay, good. You're the plaintiff. Have you went to them with an offer to mediate?
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:09:01.000]  Yeah, we had a mediation. She refused to appear.
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:03.000]  That's interesting.
[01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:10.000]  Yeah, I told you this before, Randy. She's violated two court orders. The judge has let her off the hook.
[01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  She's falsified an affidavit under oath in a summary judgment setting for one of the bank owners. The judge let that go.
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:23.000]  Wait a minute. She's a third party.
[01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:24.000]  Yes.
[01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:28.000]  She has she has an errors in emissions policy.
[01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:29.000]  Yes.
[01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:32.000]  Have you sued her yet?
[01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:35.000]  No, I haven't. I've been busy doing this.
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  Okay. In Missouri, do mediators have to be licensed by the state?
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:10:00.000]  See, that I don't know. It was held at an old, I'm going to use the word Fort Knockers law firm, who's just another smart aleck attorney, doing it supposedly for free.
[01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:14.000]  Hmm. Even so, okay, it was an attorney doing the mediation to sue the attorney. Oh, wonderful. You can be fairly certain he has a malpractice policy.
[01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  Yeah.
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:31.000]  So even if he did this for free, we don't care. If he failed to act properly, if he was allowed to do the mediation, almost certainly he was only allowed to do that because he carried a bar card.
[01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:32.000]  Yeah.
[01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  And then he fudged the mediation you sue him. You know, all lawyers, when they're going through a case, they walk around looking for deep pockets. Who's got deep pockets that I can get into and who opens up their pockets for me?
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:59.000]  This lawyer opened up his errors in emissions policy for you.
[01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:12.000]  And he's just a lawyer. He's not a large debt collecting corporation. He's just a chump attorney. They'll throw him under the bus in a heartbeat.
[01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  Or you might get him to turn on to his employer, the credit card, the debt collector. Yes. In the end, it's not about the law. In the end, it's all about the politics.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:49.000]  Who opens the door so you can kick them in the behind? And not just kick them in the behind, but kick them in a way that will make them want to get you chasing somebody else instead of them.
[01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:51.000]  Okay.
[01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:56.000]  Well, in the meantime, Randy, I'm setting the case up for an appeal.
[01:11:56.000 --> 01:11:57.000]  Okay.
[01:11:57.000 --> 01:12:04.000]  The next thing I scan to you is a motion for a more definite statement. In there, it's very lengthy, but it gets into Rule 42A.
[01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  All the issues that had taken place up until this last motion would be filed. And the attorney I shared this with earlier this week kind of agreed with me.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:23.000]  That's one of the things I should do is bring to the attention of the court all the nonsense that's happened for a more definite statement.
[01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:31.000]  The judge overrules that, and pretty much he's just a one-sided corrupt little moron.
[01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:41.000]  And so the Court of Appeals can see that I've done everything to straighten this up.
[01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:44.000]  Yeah. And you get all of that in the record.
[01:12:44.000 --> 01:12:51.000]  So when you do a motion for reconsideration, it essentially is your appeal.
[01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  You point out all his errors and ask him to correct those errors by changing his rulings.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:01.000]  So that should get two-thirds of your appeal done for you.
[01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:06.000]  Absolutely. That's where I'm going, Randy.
[01:13:06.000 --> 01:13:09.000]  Beautiful. Okay.
[01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:15.000]  Did you have another question that I kept interrupting you? So did you have a question that I missed?
[01:13:15.000 --> 01:13:22.000]  Yeah. One other question and then we can end it. After this, I talked to the attorney about doing a rule.
[01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:32.000]  After this was all filed and he denies that, we was going to move under Rule 60, which I spoke to you about, I guess it was a week ago.
[01:13:32.000 --> 01:13:39.000]  And under Rule 60D3, talking about setting aside a judgment for a fraud on the court,
[01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:49.000]  essentially what she did is she procured one of the bank owners to go along and sign his name on the affidavit.
[01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:57.000]  And he definitely lied. And she made up the document and they submitted to the court. And so that's a fraud.
[01:13:57.000 --> 01:14:11.000]  So hold on. Hold on. You're using pronouns. And I don't know who the he's and the she's are.
[01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:17.000]  Okay. Can you go back through that and kind of clarify who these actors are?
[01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:28.000]  Yeah, I'm sorry, Randy. I mean the attorney who drafted the affidavit for one of the bank owners
[01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:35.000]  and it was a falsified and fabricated document and I caught him at it.
[01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:49.000]  And under Rule 60D3, that's the section called fraud on the court to set aside a judgment or an order.
[01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  Based on a fraudulent document, that sounds perfect.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:15:05.000]  Yes. And then, of course, all the other issues, you're under Rule 60B3 for fraud intrinsic or extrinsic 60B6,
[01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  which is the catch-all section, says for any reason that justifies relief.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  So all the miscurrent behavior they did, I kept catching them at.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  And the appeals court is going to look at this and go, this guy was trying to do his best,
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:28.000]  but because of their activity, I had to take care of this stuff and it put me two months behind the discovery,
[01:15:28.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  the scheduling order for discovery, and then the judge just went haywire on me.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:40.000]  And in my opinion, it's only my opinion, that he got several calls from all these people just saying,
[01:15:40.000 --> 01:15:46.000]  listen, man, this guy's going to catch us as fraud. You got to get them out of here.
[01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:52.000]  And why would they be doing this on a simple fair credit reporting act case?
[01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  Because there's something they're hiding.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:16:00.000]  They're concerned about collateral estoppel.
[01:16:00.000 --> 01:16:04.000]  Okay. Now, I have no idea what that is, Randy.
[01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:09.000]  They're concerned that they're going to come in and argue a position,
[01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:14.000]  and the court's going to rule against that position.
[01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:21.000]  That would leave them collaterally estopped from arguing that position anywhere else.
[01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:23.000]  Yes, sir.
[01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:28.000]  They don't want that, you know, it's not just the appeals court decision that can hurt them.
[01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  The appeals court decision gives you a ruling that you can use.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  What's probably more potentially dangerous to these guys is collateral estoppel.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:42.000]  When we come back from the break, I'll go into that a little bit further.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  So it's really straightforward. It makes good sense.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  This is Randy Kelton on the Radio. Our caller is number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  Give us a call. We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  Chances are you've heard of My Magic Mud, but have you used it?
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:09.000]  Thousands of people are blown away by the clean and healthy feeling they experience after just one use.
[01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:13.000]  Here's what Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, has to say about the product.
[01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:16.000]  Hey everybody, this is Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books.
[01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  I just want to tell everybody about My Magic Mud.
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  I use the product, and it makes my teeth feel clean and healthy.
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:23.000]  I think it makes them stronger.
[01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:25.000]  I've got lots of customers that come in and say the same thing.
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:27.000]  You can pick yours up at Brave New Books.
[01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:33.000]  If that wasn't enough, Dr. Griffin Cole, DDS, who's been featured on the Alex Jones show, loves it too.
[01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:37.000]  Hi, I'm Dr. Griffin Cole, and I've got to tell you, I really love this Magic Mud product.
[01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:43.000]  Because charcoal is so absorbent, it's very effective at taking off all the sticky plaque and debris that gets stuck on our teeth every day.
[01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:45.000]  I highly recommend My Magic Mud.
[01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  If you haven't yet experienced My Magic Mud, it's never too late to brighten your smile and strengthen your teeth.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:56.000]  Get your jar of My Magic Mud today at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadalupe Street,
[01:17:56.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  or order online today at MyMagicMud.com.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:05.000]  At Capital Coin and Bullion, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination
[01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  by delivering excellent customer service and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  We provide a wide assortment of favorite products featuring a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:19.000]  We cater to beginners in coin collecting, as well as large transactions for investors.
[01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  We believe in educating our customers with resources from top accredited metals dealers and journalists.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:27.000]  If we don't have what you're looking for, we can find it.
[01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  In addition, we carry popular young Jeopardy products, such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Burps.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:39.000]  We also offer One World Way, Mountain House Storable Foods, Berkey Water Products, ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  We broker metals IRA accounts and we also accept Bitcoins as payment.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  Call us at 512-646-6440.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:51.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half mile south of Anderson.
[01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:55.000]  We're open Monday through Friday 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 2.
[01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:02.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBullying.com or call 512-646-6440.
[01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:36.000]  Well, ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:36.000 --> 01:19:41.000]  I was blindsided but now I can see you plan.
[01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:47.000]  You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my hand.
[01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:52.000]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:56.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:56.000 --> 01:20:01.000]  Randy Kelton, Wheelbar Radio, we're talking to Terry in Missouri.
[01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  Okay, Terry, sounds like you got a lot to go after me with.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  Oh, somebody muted you again.
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:15.000]  Okay, there we go.
[01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  Go ahead, Terry, I finally got you unmuted.
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:23.000]  Okay, I didn't hear your last statement, Randy.
[01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:28.000]  I'm saying it looks like you're in a mission.
[01:20:28.000 --> 01:20:35.000]  If you've got these guys cold on presenting fraudulent documents,
[01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  the thing I would like to do is hammer them on minor issues,
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:50.000]  on issues they consider minor so they don't see this coming.
[01:20:50.000 --> 01:20:52.000]  And that's when they screw up the worst.
[01:20:52.000 --> 01:21:00.000]  Bushwhack in court is just absolutely wonderful.
[01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:02.000]  It's great fun.
[01:21:02.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  And this is the only what gets them off their stride.
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  And here a lawyer comes in and hands in a document.
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  In your case, he went to the banker and suborned perjury
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:22.000]  and then created a perjures document,
[01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:26.000]  which would be tampered with a government document.
[01:21:26.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  And then he presented that document to the court,
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:39.000]  which was an act of failure to speak with candor to the court or fraud on the court.
[01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:43.000]  That gives you a claim directly against the lawyer.
[01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:47.000]  Now, when you start going after the lawyer,
[01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  then you start getting into these relationships we talked about earlier.
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:54.000]  Yes.
[01:21:54.000 --> 01:21:58.000]  About the four-sided chessboard.
[01:21:58.000 --> 01:22:02.000]  Now you got the lawyers looking back and forth at each other and saying,
[01:22:02.000 --> 01:22:07.000]  hey, that client you got over there, he's kicking my behind.
[01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:11.000]  You need to do something to get him off my case.
[01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  And they both look at the judge and try to get the judge to get him off their case.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  That's how I got my last criminal case thrown out.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:27.000]  The judge threw out the case in order to protect my lawyer from me.
[01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:31.000]  And if you want your lawyer to be able to actively adjudicate your issues,
[01:22:31.000 --> 01:22:34.000]  you have to give him plausible deniability.
[01:22:34.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  Now, he don't have to like plausible deniability.
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:43.000]  Plausible deniability is when the lawyer goes before the court
[01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:46.000]  and he doesn't say this is this way, this is that way.
[01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:53.000]  He says, my client says, and when he prefaces what he's going to say with that,
[01:22:53.000 --> 01:23:01.000]  he's telling the judge, not my argument, this is my client has ordered me to do this,
[01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  and if I don't do this, he's going to kick my behind.
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  And in your case here, well, you're per se.
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  You got this lawyer here who's working to help his client,
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:18.000]  and then by working to help his client, all of a sudden he gets in trouble.
[01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  The only place he's got to go is the judge and his client to cover him now.
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:31.000]  So you get to change the dynamics, and criminal charges are a real good way to do that
[01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  because he's not as worried about being criminally prosecuted
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:41.000]  as he is worried about losing his bar card.
[01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  It's unlikely he'll get criminally prosecuted,
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:49.000]  but his bar card is a lot more tenuous.
[01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:57.000]  Bar cards can disappear into the ether on the whim of a judge.
[01:23:57.000 --> 01:23:58.000]  Wow.
[01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  Okay, do you have anything else for us?
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:05.000]  No, I mean that's your description of collateral estoppel, incorrect?
[01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:07.000]  Oh, I'm sorry, that's where I was supposed to go.
[01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  My bad, collateral estoppel.
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:18.000]  When a party comes before the court and argues a position,
[01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:26.000]  they cannot go before another court and argue a diametrically opposed position.
[01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:34.000]  When a party comes before the court and makes a claim or argues a position
[01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:38.000]  and it's ruled against him,
[01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:43.000]  he cannot come to a subsequent court and bring that same argument
[01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:46.000]  because it's already been adjudicated.
[01:24:46.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  Yeah.
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  And it goes to res judicata.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:57.000]  Collateral estoppel is a special form of res judicata.
[01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:00.000]  We had a client.
[01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:07.000]  Bank of America sued Deutsche Bank over a group of notes.
[01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:09.000]  Deutsche Bank went to the court and said,
[01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  we have nothing to do with those notes.
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:16.000]  Then Deutsche Bank sued her to foreclose on one of those notes
[01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:22.000]  that they already told the court they had nothing to do with.
[01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:25.000]  Even if they did have something to do with it,
[01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:33.000]  since they already state they're collateral estopped from changing that position.
[01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  Does that make sense?
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:39.000]  They used one of the sections under fair credit.
[01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:46.000]  They finagled that very cleverly to get their summary judgment
[01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  ruled in their favor against my summary judgment.
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:58.000]  However, they didn't pay very close attention to some critical issues that I uncovered.
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  I actually used one of their cases that they cited against them.
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:08.000]  And they're not going to be able to overcome that in the least
[01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:13.000]  because they didn't talk about and I didn't talk about fraud at that point
[01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  because I was uncertain.
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:18.000]  They didn't talk about the identity theft.
[01:26:18.000 --> 01:26:22.000]  I'm bringing it up now because I got that cardholder agreement
[01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:24.000]  that clarifies these issues.
[01:26:24.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  So the previous discussions and the way they did their motions,
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:33.000]  they're going to be collateral estopped
[01:26:33.000 --> 01:26:35.000]  and they won't be able to bring that up any longer.
[01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:40.000]  Once this gets out of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, they're going to stop that.
[01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  That's pretty much what we're talking about.
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  It may be that they may be at a point that they realize they've opened some doors
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:57.000]  and that you can walk through them so they're trying to force this thing to close
[01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:04.000]  and get you out of there before they have to address issues that they have brought up.
[01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:09.000]  Yes, sir, and it's going to be very severe with these guys.
[01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  This is the most honoris case I've ever read.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:19.000]  Well, one of the things you might consider, in Kansas City, Missouri recently,
[01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  and I think it was an FCRA case, the $82 million judgment by the jury.
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:31.000]  Yes, I already talked to the law firm and know all about it.
[01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:35.000]  Yes, so that may be one of the things that's motivating them.
[01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:38.000]  They don't want to wind up in that position.
[01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  Yes.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:42.000]  Okay, I need to move ahead.
[01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  Thank you, Randy.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:44.000]  Have a good night.
[01:27:44.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  Thank you, Terry.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:51.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Wheelbarrow Radio, and Chris.
[01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:57.000]  Chris, I know you've been waiting a while, but we have a new caller
[01:27:57.000 --> 01:28:00.000]  and we'd generally like to take the first-time callers first.
[01:28:00.000 --> 01:28:04.000]  Would you mind if I go to Barbara?
[01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:05.000]  No, go right ahead.
[01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  Can you hold on?
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:08.000]  So far, sure, sure.
[01:28:08.000 --> 01:28:10.000]  Okay, okay, thank you, Chris.
[01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:14.000]  Okay, we're going to go into Barbara in Texas.
[01:28:14.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  Hello, Barbara.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:19.000]  Hi, how are you?
[01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:20.000]  I am good.
[01:28:20.000 --> 01:28:23.000]  What do you have for us tonight?
[01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:31.000]  Well, I'm trying, it's in mortgage, and I'm kind of in the middle of a,
[01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:33.000]  they're trying to evict me out of my property,
[01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  and I recently have experienced going, requesting a jury trial
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:43.000]  and actually getting a jury trial.
[01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:46.000]  But, you know, hello, you know,
[01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  the judge would not let me use my documents or anything,
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:51.000]  but he left the other side.
[01:28:51.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  Then after that, he had the jury, you know,
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:58.000]  for going to deliberate to make a verdict.
[01:28:58.000 --> 01:29:02.000]  But once the jury went into to make a verdict,
[01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:08.000]  the judge basically interfered, said, we're not having a jury trial.
[01:29:08.000 --> 01:29:10.000]  I'm going to make a ruling.
[01:29:10.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  If I have enough evidence, I rule for the plaintiff.
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:16.000]  Okay, question.
[01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  Yes.
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:24.000]  Did opposing counsel raise an objection,
[01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:28.000]  move to dismiss for lack of evidence?
[01:29:28.000 --> 01:29:30.000]  No.
[01:29:30.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  So the judge acted sui sponte.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  Sui sponte means spontaneously, on his own.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:42.000]  Good, okay.
[01:29:42.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  Go ahead.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  Okay, wait, wait, hang on.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  We're about to go to break.
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  Randy Kelton, Rue de la Radio, we'll be right back.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  Ugg, folks hate Monday because it means the start of another work week.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:12.000]  There's one activity you can start on Monday that's likely to be a smashing success.
[01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back to tell you what it is.
[01:30:16.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:21.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:28.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:30:28.000 --> 01:30:31.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:34.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:30:34.000 --> 01:30:37.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:41.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:50.000]  Monday's diet is full of grace, but Tuesday's diet could be a disgrace.
[01:30:50.000 --> 01:30:53.000]  A study in Britain shows that people who started dieting on a Tuesday
[01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:56.000]  were the most likely to lose their resolve within a week
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:30:59.000]  and end up heavier than when they started.
[01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:01.000]  Friday was another bad weight loss day.
[01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:05.000]  More than half of the 2,000 people surveyed ditched their diets on Friday
[01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:07.000]  after a stressful week at work.
[01:31:07.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  What were the good dieting days?
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  People who started their diets on Sunday and Monday were far more likely
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  to shed the most weight and keep the weight off.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:18.000]  So maybe Fleetwood Mac had it right when they sang,
[01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  Monday morning you sure looked fine.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:23.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:31.000]  For more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:39.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:44.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:47.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:49.000]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[01:31:49.000 --> 01:31:51.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000]  I'm a natural engineer.
[01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:54.000]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[01:31:54.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:31:59.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[01:31:59.000 --> 01:32:02.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[01:32:02.000 --> 01:32:04.000]  Hey, it's Danny here for Hill Country Home Improvements.
[01:32:04.000 --> 01:32:07.000]  Did your home receive hail or wind damage from the recent storms?
[01:32:07.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  Come on, we all know the government caused it with their chemtrails,
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:12.000]  but good luck getting them to pay for it.
[01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Okay, I might be kidding about the chemtrails,
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:16.000]  but I'm serious about your roof.
[01:32:16.000 --> 01:32:17.000]  That's why you have insurance,
[01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:20.000]  and Hill Country Home Improvements can handle the claim for you
[01:32:20.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  at a pocket expense.
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:24.000]  And we accept Bitcoin as a multiyear A-plus member
[01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:27.000]  of the Better Business Bureau with zero complaints.
[01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:29.000]  You can trust Hill Country Home Improvements
[01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  to handle your claim and your roof right the first time.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Just call 512-992-8745 or go to hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  Mention the crypto show and get $100 off,
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:44.000]  and we'll donate another $100 to the Logos Radio Network
[01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:46.000]  to help continue this programming.
[01:32:46.000 --> 01:32:48.000]  So if those out-of-town roofers come knocking,
[01:32:48.000 --> 01:32:51.000]  your door should be locking.
[01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:57.000]  That's 512-992-8745 or hillcountryhomeimprovements.com.
[01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000]  Discounts are based on full roof replacement.
[01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  May not actually be kidding about chemtrails.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:05.000]  Looking for some truth?
[01:33:05.000 --> 01:33:06.000]  You found it.
[01:33:06.000 --> 01:33:35.000]  Logosradionetwork.com.
[01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:36.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:33:36.000 --> 01:33:38.000]  Randy Kelton, Rube Law Radio.
[01:33:38.000 --> 01:33:44.000]  And in fact, this is not Barbara's first call.
[01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:52.000]  She called in last night and I asked you to call back tonight.
[01:33:52.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  Well, I asked for the judge's name, and you gave it to me.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:04.000]  And this morning, I called the judge
[01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:08.000]  and got ahold of the judge's coordinator
[01:34:08.000 --> 01:34:13.000]  and told the coordinator that I will be doing a show
[01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:18.000]  that I understand that the judge nullified jury
[01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:21.000]  when they were in deliberation
[01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:26.000]  and bypassed the jury and ruled past them sui sponte.
[01:34:26.000 --> 01:34:29.000]  And I found this very interesting,
[01:34:29.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  and I do a radio show on legal reform,
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:34.000]  and we're going to talk about this issue tomorrow night.
[01:34:34.000 --> 01:34:37.000]  And I might be saying some things
[01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:42.000]  that sound somewhat derogatory towards the judge.
[01:34:42.000 --> 01:34:45.000]  And that before I do that, I have to give,
[01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:50.000]  it's only appropriate that I give the judge opportunity to rebut.
[01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:52.000]  So I gave her my name and address,
[01:34:52.000 --> 01:34:57.000]  and if he wants to address this issue with me
[01:34:57.000 --> 01:35:01.000]  so I can express his position on the air,
[01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:02.000]  I would be glad to do that,
[01:35:02.000 --> 01:35:08.000]  or he can call in the show and express his position.
[01:35:08.000 --> 01:35:11.000]  Well, of course he can call back,
[01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:19.000]  but Barbara, you've got to know this judge is not a happy camper.
[01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:22.000]  And when you get done with him,
[01:35:22.000 --> 01:35:28.000]  he's going to be even a more unhappy camper.
[01:35:28.000 --> 01:35:35.000]  Did you listen to the conversation with Terry just before you?
[01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:38.000]  No, earlier today I could not get on.
[01:35:38.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  I kept getting fast, busy signals, so I just rescheduled.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  Oh, okay.
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:50.000]  Okay, well, we take a somewhat different approach here than most.
[01:35:50.000 --> 01:35:58.000]  It is our position that all of our public officials are public servants,
[01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  and you and me and all of the rest of us,
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:08.000]  we are the masters of the servants.
[01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  They're the servants, we're the masters, and they are not to forget it.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:23.000]  And we specialize in making sure that they don't want to ever forget who the master is.
[01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  So when we get in front of a public official and we ask an official to do something,
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  one of the rules is never ask a public official to do anything you actually want him to do,
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  because you never ask a public official to do anything that the law does not specifically require him to do.
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:52.000]  And this goes to what you do in court.
[01:36:52.000 --> 01:36:58.000]  When you go into court, the judge has two primary duties.
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:02.000]  He must determine the facts in accordance to the rules of evidence,
[01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:07.000]  then apply the law as it comes to him to the facts in the case.
[01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:14.000]  So your only purpose in court is putting the facts on the record and the law on the record.
[01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:18.000]  You don't care what that judge does.
[01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:25.000]  Always you must expect the court's going to rule against you out of hand at every turn.
[01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:31.000]  He may not, but you have to act as if he will.
[01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:39.000]  Your only purpose in the trial court is to get the facts and law on the record.
[01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:43.000]  You're merely setting the record for appeal.
[01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:53.000]  When you go into the court from that perspective, it won't take the judge very long to figure it out.
[01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:57.000]  You give him a document that lists all the facts,
[01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:06.000]  and then you give him your legal arguments as to how these facts should determine what the judge should do.
[01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:11.000]  You can give the judge the most convincing arguments
[01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  and the most compelling reasons why he should do what you want him to do.
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:27.000]  But if you don't give him facts and law as it applies to those facts, he has no power to rule in your favor.
[01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  Now, while you're telling him your whole story,
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  he's going to sit there and pay attention and nod thoughtfully,
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  but he's going to appear to pay attention.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:48.000]  But he's not going to be, because you're not putting facts and law before him.
[01:38:48.000 --> 01:38:52.000]  So he's not there to give you legal advice.
[01:38:52.000 --> 01:38:58.000]  So he's not going to tell you that what you're giving him is not something he can use.
[01:38:58.000 --> 01:39:04.000]  He's just going to sit there and nod politely and when you're done, he's going to rule against you.
[01:39:04.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  So you develop the facts, and you need to make up a statement of facts,
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:15.000]  and then you look up law that applies to those facts.
[01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:19.000]  This is not near as hard as it seems.
[01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:24.000]  So that when you go before the judge, you're just setting a record.
[01:39:24.000 --> 01:39:29.000]  Now, I tell judges real fast what you do.
[01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:31.000]  You're not going to get me upset.
[01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:35.000]  I just don't care. I'm only here to set the record.
[01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:38.000]  We'll argue this all out in the appeals court.
[01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:46.000]  Well, when you go into court from that perspective, they can tell really fast.
[01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:52.000]  If they can't tell, and the judge does something stupid like this judge did,
[01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:55.000]  you get to bang him good.
[01:39:55.000 --> 01:40:01.000]  And the reason I say never ask the public official to do anything you actually want him to do is
[01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:12.000]  because when he doesn't do it, you've already got your hammer here ready to bump him with it.
[01:40:12.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  Go ahead. Are you there? I'm getting some...
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:17.000]  No, no. I'm listening. There was another bump.
[01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:21.000]  Okay. Just so you understand how this works.
[01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:24.000]  My mic has a suppressor on it.
[01:40:24.000 --> 01:40:31.000]  So that if you're speaking and I speak, it'll push your voice down undermined.
[01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:36.000]  Or if I'm speaking and you try to speak, nobody will hear you because it'll push you down under.
[01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:41.000]  Sometimes if I get noise on my end, it pushes your sound down.
[01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:44.000]  Okay. Anyway, this is kind of the basics.
[01:40:44.000 --> 01:40:51.000]  And I'm thinking in terms of never ask a public official to do anything you actually want him to do
[01:40:51.000 --> 01:40:58.000]  because you never asked him to do anything that if he doesn't do it, you get to cobbler him.
[01:40:58.000 --> 01:41:04.000]  And the other rule is never interfere with somebody when they're screwing up.
[01:41:04.000 --> 01:41:11.000]  This was a big screw up. This was a really big screw up.
[01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  You're not just there to adjudicate your case. You're the master.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:23.000]  You're there to ensure that your public officials follow your law.
[01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:28.000]  And it's your law. Okay. It's my law too.
[01:41:28.000 --> 01:41:31.000]  But it's your law. It's yours personally.
[01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:36.000]  Not the judges. Not the attorneys. It's yours.
[01:41:36.000 --> 01:41:38.000]  And they are not to forget it.
[01:41:38.000 --> 01:41:45.000]  They have a duty to abide by all relevant law.
[01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:53.000]  And when they don't abide by all relevant law, you have a duty to thump them good.
[01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:58.000]  Judges tend to hate pro se litigants.
[01:41:58.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  They don't hate pro se litigants because they write stupid readings.
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:06.000]  They like that part. It makes it easy to screw them around.
[01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:14.000]  They hate pro se litigants because every once in a while they come across the pro se from hell.
[01:42:14.000 --> 01:42:22.000]  And that's what this show is about, to teach you how to be the pro se from hell.
[01:42:22.000 --> 01:42:32.000]  But understand, nothing that I suggest you do is suggested out of malice.
[01:42:32.000 --> 01:42:36.000]  I have no malice toward my public officials and you shouldn't either.
[01:42:36.000 --> 01:42:38.000]  Right.
[01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:45.000]  Yeah, I think of my public officials like my grandkids. I love them dearly.
[01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:52.000]  But if one of them runs out in the road, well, I'm fixing to tan his hide.
[01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:57.000]  I don't have to like it. I don't have to want to do it. But it is my job.
[01:42:57.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  So when you sting that judge big time, sorry, Bubba, life is tough.
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:18.000]  That should get Class A misdemeanor, official oppression, criminal violation 39.03 Texas Penal Code.
[01:43:18.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  If a public official acting under the color, color meaning pretense,
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:29.000]  exerts or purports to exert an authority he does not expressly have
[01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  and in the process denies a citizen in full free access to or enjoyment of a right,
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  that's Class A misdemeanor in Texas.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:48.000]  It's malfeasance in office in that he purported to exert an authority he did not expressly have.
[01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  Hang on. I'll go into this a little bit more on the other side.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:43:58.000]  Randy Kelton, Ruval Radio, I call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:43:58.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:08.000]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:19.000]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:30.000]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other poxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:50.000]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503
[01:44:50.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:00.000]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:04.000 --> 01:45:15.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.000 --> 01:45:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:46:01.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:01.000 --> 01:46:14.000]  Thank you.
[01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:33.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:46:33.000 --> 01:46:35.000]  Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:49.000]  And I'm going to kind of go through the basics here so that when you go back into court, it will be a whole lot easier for you to deal with it.
[01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:57.000]  This is a frame of reference, a way to hold your mind that makes what you're doing in there a whole lot easier.
[01:46:57.000 --> 01:47:02.000]  And at this point, you have a really good shot at this judge.
[01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:07.000]  This was the judge and the lawyer on the other side.
[01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:12.000]  The judge absolutely had no power.
[01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:21.000]  Once he sent the case to the jury, then he had no power to intervene.
[01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:26.000]  And technically, that's jury tampering.
[01:47:26.000 --> 01:47:37.000]  The judge had the power, sui sponte, to rule that there was lack of evidence prior to remanding the case to the jury.
[01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:43.000]  But once it was given to the jury, his authority ended.
[01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:53.000]  So he exerted or purported to exert an authority he did not have and in the process denied you your jury verdict.
[01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:56.000]  That's a big deal. That's class-safe misdemeanor.
[01:47:56.000 --> 01:48:02.000]  And that is exactly the kinds of things that can really get a judge hammered.
[01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:06.000]  So there are two things to do, three actually.
[01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:16.000]  First one is to file a judicial conduct complaint with the Commission on Judicial Conduct.
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:29.000]  Second one is to file a criminal complaint against the judge for violation of 39.03 Penal Code, the official oppression, denying you in a right.
[01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:33.000]  Nine point.
[01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  Say that again.
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:38.000]  You said 39.
[01:48:38.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  03.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:50.000]  Chapter 39 are offenses that only public officials can commit.
[01:48:50.000 --> 01:48:53.000]  39.03, you should read that a couple of times.
[01:48:53.000 --> 01:48:56.000]  It is a catch-all.
[01:48:56.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  And it's real easy to catch them with that.
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  They were so arrogant.
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:14.000]  I went into court and a friend of mine is having an eviction hearing and I walked up to the bar and I'm standing there and the judge looked up and said, can I help you?
[01:49:14.000 --> 01:49:19.000]  I said, yes, Your Honor, my name is Randall Kelton and I have a hearing deficiency.
[01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:22.000]  Well, Mr. Kelton, just what's wrong with your hearing?
[01:49:22.000 --> 01:49:30.000]  So, Judge, I was down in Mexico the other day and I drank too much tequila and I lost my hearing aid.
[01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:33.000]  Well, actually, I lied to him, I had it in my pocket.
[01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  Well, Mr. Kelton, why are you telling me this?
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:39.000]  I said, well, do you have accommodation for the hearing impaired?
[01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:41.000]  No, Mr. Kelton, I do not.
[01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:43.000]  You got a sound system here, will you turn it up?
[01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:45.000]  No, I will not.
[01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:47.000]  Well, then, will you speak up?
[01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  And he did, told him.
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:53.000]  Bailiff, I didn't say, shut up, he's throwing me out of the courtroom.
[01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:55.000]  So I had my hearing.
[01:49:55.000 --> 01:49:59.000]  When I was done, I walked to the bar, I pointed to Bailiff, you come with me.
[01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:04.000]  I get outside and Bailiff said, Mr. Kelton, what can I do for you?
[01:50:04.000 --> 01:50:07.000]  I need you to go in there and arrest that judge.
[01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:10.000]  Well, why not arrest the judge?
[01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  Criminal violation 3903 penal code, I'm sorry, he committed official oppression against me,
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:24.000]  violation of 3903 penal code in that he failed to perform a duty he was required to perform
[01:50:24.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  and in the process denied me in the full amount of free access to or enjoyment of a right.
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:34.000]  And the bailiff said, well, Mr. Kelton, what right did he deny you in?
[01:50:34.000 --> 01:50:41.000]  Well, he denied me in my right to accommodation under the hearing under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
[01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:48.000]  And he said, well, Mr. Kelton, why didn't you tell him about the Americans with Disabilities Act?
[01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  Heck, if I had done that, he might have turned the sound up.
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  Then Bailiff stood there a minute and his grin started to spread across his face.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:03.000]  He said, you set him up.
[01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  I said, yeah, he was pretty good about it.
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:07.000]  He fell for it really good.
[01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:13.000]  And then I pulled my hearing aid out of my pocket and stuck it back on.
[01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:19.000]  Point is, you don't need to be afraid of these scoundrels.
[01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:20.000]  They have a job.
[01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:22.000]  They have a duty.
[01:51:22.000 --> 01:51:27.000]  They are bound in ways that you are not.
[01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:35.000]  And when you start filing charges against this judge, a judicial conduct complaint marks him.
[01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:42.000]  Now, if you file a judicial conduct commission on judicial conduct, it's not going to do anything.
[01:51:42.000 --> 01:51:44.000]  They've got judges on the panel.
[01:51:44.000 --> 01:51:49.000]  Judges are not going to police judges.
[01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:52.000]  State Bar Association, lawyers are not going to police lawyers.
[01:51:52.000 --> 01:51:54.000]  It's just how it works.
[01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  So they're going to send you back a letter saying that we examined into your accusation,
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:02.000]  find it does not rise to the level of misconduct.
[01:52:02.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  And that's okay because it raises his bond rating and it puts to mark on his record.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:12.000]  When he runs, he runs on his record.
[01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:22.000]  Now, when the judge committed that improper act, opposing counsel carrying a bar card had a duty
[01:52:22.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  to instruct the judge that what he was doing was improper.
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:29.000]  But he didn't do that.
[01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  So you file a bar grievance against him.
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:35.000]  If you file a bar grievance against this attorney,
[01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:41.000]  you're going to get a letter back from the State Bar Association that says we examined into your accusation,
[01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:45.000]  find it does not rise to the level of misconduct.
[01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:49.000]  I have a lot of those letters.
[01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:53.000]  But that's a good thing.
[01:52:53.000 --> 01:53:04.000]  The reason it's a good thing is his insurance carrier knows that they're going to throw it in the trash.
[01:53:04.000 --> 01:53:09.000]  So how does his insurance carrier measure his level of risk?
[01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:11.000]  By valid bar grievances?
[01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:13.000]  They throw them all in the trash.
[01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:16.000]  By the numbers.
[01:53:16.000 --> 01:53:20.000]  One bar grievance, your first year of practice, they cancel immediately.
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:24.000]  Two bar grievances, any one year of practice, they cancel.
[01:53:24.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  Three, they'll cancel your law firm's malpractice insurance.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  I had a lawyer say, that's pretty unfair, and I'm greening from ear to ear.
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:38.000]  And he said, oh, I shouldn't have told you that.
[01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:42.000]  That's right, you shouldn't have.
[01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:50.000]  Malpractice insurance starts between $25,000 and $45,000 a year.
[01:53:50.000 --> 01:53:54.000]  If he's been practicing for a number of years and you green him,
[01:53:54.000 --> 01:53:57.000]  they're going to double his malpractice insurance.
[01:53:57.000 --> 01:54:01.000]  Slight coverage on your car.
[01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:07.000]  You buy a new car, you go to Wal-Mart, you go in, you come out, somebody's bashed a fender in.
[01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:11.000]  Call an insurance company to come out and fix it, they double your rates.
[01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  You go out next month, somebody bashes another fender in.
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:18.000]  Insurance company comes out, fixes it, cancels.
[01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:23.000]  Your fault, their fault, nobody's fault, they don't care.
[01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:27.000]  If you are too high a risk, they won't cover you, they cancel.
[01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:32.000]  Same thing with malpractice insurance for lawyers.
[01:54:32.000 --> 01:54:36.000]  In the end, it's all about the money.
[01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:40.000]  So we should have Stingham.
[01:54:40.000 --> 01:54:41.000]  What do you want?
[01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:43.000]  I need a Stingham.
[01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:45.000]  Go ahead.
[01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:49.000]  No, I said I need a Stingham.
[01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:51.000]  Wait, I didn't understand that.
[01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:53.000]  You need to Stingham, yeah.
[01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  Absolutely you do.
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:54:59.000]  You need to give them a good reason to rule in your favor.
[01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:05.000]  And if you will, what county are you in?
[01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:07.000]  Dallas.
[01:55:07.000 --> 01:55:08.000]  Okay.
[01:55:08.000 --> 01:55:11.000]  It's a little harder to get the records from Dallas.
[01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:16.000]  You need to go down to the county registrar of deeds.
[01:55:16.000 --> 01:55:27.000]  And ask the county registrar to run a search on your name in the property records database.
[01:55:27.000 --> 01:55:35.000]  And it should bring up a listing of all of the documents filed in the county record relevant to you.
[01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:40.000]  Have you bought more than one house in Dallas, in Dallas County?
[01:55:40.000 --> 01:55:41.000]  No.
[01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:48.000]  Okay, then all the records that come up should apply to this property.
[01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:53.000]  And you want a copy of all of those records.
[01:55:53.000 --> 01:55:59.000]  Ask them if they can scan them or if they can email them to you.
[01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:03.000]  And if they can, then email them to me.
[01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:04.000]  Okay.
[01:56:04.000 --> 01:56:07.000]  And I'll go through and look at it.
[01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:09.000]  I'll give you an evaluation of what I think you can do.
[01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:15.000]  You see, I do the kinds of things I was suggesting that you do.
[01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:19.000]  But I've been doing those kinds of things for a long time.
[01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:26.000]  So I got some really sophisticated stuff to sting along with.
[01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:27.000]  Okay.
[01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:32.000]  How old is your note?
[01:56:32.000 --> 01:56:34.000]  It's eight years.
[01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  Eight years.
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:39.000]  Who was the original lender?
[01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:42.000]  The mortgage depot.
[01:56:42.000 --> 01:56:44.000]  Mortgage depot.
[01:56:44.000 --> 01:56:48.000]  Is mortgage depot still in business?
[01:56:48.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  No.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:57:03.000]  Also, I found out with the Secretary of State that mortgage depot was forfeited from doing business in the state of Texas six months prior before I even set up closing the business at home.
[01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:06.000]  Oh, yummy.
[01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:08.000]  Oh, wonderful.
[01:57:08.000 --> 01:57:09.000]  Okay.
[01:57:09.000 --> 01:57:19.000]  If they were stopped from doing business, that raises an interesting question.
[01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:24.000]  We have a case in Florida on American wholesale lenders.
[01:57:24.000 --> 01:57:34.000]  And what the case said was countrywide filed a DBA under American wholesale lenders.
[01:57:34.000 --> 01:57:44.000]  And American wholesale lenders then represented itself as a New York corporation, but it was never filed as a corporation in New York.
[01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  So the judge in Florida said American wholesale lenders never existed and did not have authority to do business in Florida.
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  Therefore, you have to give the guy back every penny that he gave you.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  And then they said, well, what about Tender?
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:08.000]  We get the property back.
[01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  He said, no, you didn't.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  You gave it to him.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:15.000]  He gets to keep the property, too.
[01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  You could be in that position.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:19.000]  Hang on.
[01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:21.000]  We're about to go to break.
[01:58:21.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  Randy Kelton, rule of our radio, our call-in number, 512-646-94.
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  We're about to go to the top of the hour break.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:32.000]  So we have a little more time.
[01:58:32.000 --> 01:58:42.000]  It would be helpful to us if you would go to locustradionetwork.com and look at our sponsors and help keep us on the air.
[01:58:42.000 --> 01:58:44.000]  We need all the help we can get.
[01:58:44.000 --> 01:58:47.000]  This is Randy Kelton, rule of our radio.
[01:58:47.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:58.000]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[01:58:58.000 --> 01:59:07.000]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the scripture.
[01:59:07.000 --> 01:59:09.000]  Enter the recovery version.
[01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:18.000]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[01:59:18.000 --> 01:59:28.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[01:59:28.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:48.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[01:59:48.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:03.000]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.