[00:00.000 --> 00:06.000] Maryland Motor is hated speed cameras so much, they took it out on the cameras themselves. [00:06.000 --> 00:09.000] The government solution? Add cameras to watch the cameras. [00:09.000 --> 00:14.000] I've got your camera all bracked back with the people's battle against surveillance wear after this. [00:14.000 --> 00:20.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [00:20.000 --> 00:25.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [00:25.000 --> 00:33.000] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [00:33.000 --> 00:40.000] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. [00:40.000 --> 00:43.000] Start over with StartPage. [00:43.000 --> 00:48.000] Folks don't care for speed cameras in Prince George's County, Maryland. How do I know? [00:48.000 --> 00:51.000] Well, citizens have done a number on six of them. [00:51.000 --> 00:57.000] The first one was shot. The next flipped over. A third had its legs cut off and a fourth got torched. [00:57.000 --> 01:02.000] Imagine 30,000 bucks of government surveillance equipment up in smoke. [01:02.000 --> 01:06.000] Then police had a thought. Why not have cameras watch the cameras? [01:06.000 --> 01:12.000] The police chief who brainstormed that one assured citizens the new cameras were not a case of big brother. [01:12.000 --> 01:20.000] Major Robert Liberati, no, I'm not making that name up, he explained the state was simply trying to keep the public safe from themselves. [01:20.000 --> 01:25.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:33.000 --> 01:39.000] It took a very special brain to devise the theory of relativity, but was Albert Einstein born super smart? [01:39.000 --> 01:46.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back with details on new discoveries into the famous physicist's brain in a moment. [01:46.000 --> 01:52.000] Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [01:52.000 --> 01:57.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [01:57.000 --> 02:02.000] So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself. [02:02.000 --> 02:05.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [02:05.000 --> 02:12.000] This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing. [02:12.000 --> 02:16.000] Let's start over with StartPage. [02:16.000 --> 02:24.000] Albert Einstein had one of the greatest minds in history, but was he just born brainy or did thinking about physics cause his brain to expand? [02:24.000 --> 02:28.000] Newly discovered photographs of Einstein's brain may hold the answer. [02:28.000 --> 02:33.000] It appears the great physicist did indeed have something special between his ears. [02:33.000 --> 02:42.000] Einstein's brain has folds rarely seen in other brains, plus an enlarged prefrontal cortex where people imagine events and simulate their consequences. [02:42.000 --> 02:51.000] Researchers don't yet know how these differences affected Einstein's remarkable IQ, but one thing's for sure, smarts have little to do with size. [02:51.000 --> 02:55.000] Einstein's brain was average sized, relatively speaking that is. [02:55.000 --> 03:04.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine. [03:25.000 --> 03:33.000] Okay, we are back. [03:33.000 --> 03:44.000] We're in the Calhoun Denver, Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rue La Radio, and we're talking to Johnny in Texas about breaches of contract. [03:44.000 --> 03:49.000] There are always a lot of them in the data trust. [03:49.000 --> 03:59.000] In the analysis that I do, I do more with the data trust than anything else. [03:59.000 --> 04:05.000] There are lots of things in there. There are arguments that I haven't gotten to yet. [04:05.000 --> 04:15.000] For instance, Johnny, when you secured the loan, did you put down more than 20% or more as a down payment? [04:15.000 --> 04:26.000] No, they had me give them a money order, what they called a good faith payment, which they gave me back with interest at closing. [04:26.000 --> 04:30.000] Okay, say that again. I'm sorry, I had some background noise. [04:30.000 --> 04:36.000] They had me give them what they called a good faith payment. [04:36.000 --> 04:47.000] They had me give them a $500 money order and at closing, I got that $500 plus interest back. [04:47.000 --> 04:53.000] Okay, so this was a no down payment loan? [04:53.000 --> 04:59.000] Well, what they did is they got somebody else to put up the down payment basically. [04:59.000 --> 05:16.000] Okay, nice horse manure. If you didn't put down more than 20%, then you would have most likely been required to have private mortgage insurance. [05:16.000 --> 05:19.000] Were you charged for private mortgage insurance? [05:19.000 --> 05:22.000] Yes, in escrow. [05:22.000 --> 05:32.000] Okay, did you receive a private mortgage insurance policy? [05:32.000 --> 05:36.000] I believe so at closing, yes. [05:36.000 --> 05:44.000] Check and make sure. Make sure you're not looking at another kind of policy. I've never seen a policy included at closing. [05:44.000 --> 05:46.000] Okay. [05:46.000 --> 05:53.000] I've looked at last closing documents, but if you don't have one, you want to request one. [05:53.000 --> 06:04.000] Because normally in a deed across a normal when it's in paragraph 10, that addresses private mortgage insurance. [06:04.000 --> 06:17.000] What it says is that if the lender is unable to, if you are as the borrower unable to secure private mortgage insurance or the lender, actually the lender is authorized to purchase it. [06:17.000 --> 06:29.000] If the lender is unable to secure private mortgage insurance, then the lender can keep the payments and indemnify himself. [06:29.000 --> 06:41.000] If the lender has in fact indemnified himself and you default, well, he can't be harmed. [06:41.000 --> 06:45.000] There's no option for subrogation. [06:45.000 --> 06:54.000] If there's private mortgage insurance and it's by a third party and the third party has to pay off on the default, [06:54.000 --> 06:59.000] the lender would have no claim against you. [06:59.000 --> 07:04.000] Whoever the insurance company is would have the claim. [07:04.000 --> 07:08.000] If the insurance company paid off, then the property would be sold. [07:08.000 --> 07:14.000] The amount of the sale would go to the insurance company. [07:14.000 --> 07:25.000] So for them to recover, recoup part of their loss and anything excess, they could come back and sue you under subrogation. [07:25.000 --> 07:42.000] However, if the lender indemnified himself and the lender receives the benefit of the insurance, the lender can't come then come back and claim subrogation. [07:42.000 --> 07:47.000] If he could, then what are you paying for? [07:47.000 --> 07:56.000] Covenant 3 on mine is the application of payments and it says all payments shall be applied by the lender as follows. [07:56.000 --> 08:06.000] First, to the mortgage insurance premium to be paid by lender to the secretary or to the monthly charge by the secretary instead of the monthly mortgage insurance premium. [08:06.000 --> 08:13.000] And then second is taxes and third is interest and fourth is amortization of the principle of the note and fifth is too late charges under the note. [08:13.000 --> 08:20.000] Under Covenant 3, they say that they're going to take the... [08:20.000 --> 08:27.000] Okay, look at 10. 10 is generally the one that goes to the private mortgage. [08:27.000 --> 08:35.000] It's a pretty good size paragraph, but it says that the lender can indemnify himself and if he's done that, he can't be harmed. [08:35.000 --> 08:43.000] You've paid him this extra premium and he can't be harmed. [08:43.000 --> 08:51.000] Anyway, that's one that I haven't briefed out yet. I've never heard anybody bring that argument. [08:51.000 --> 09:02.000] It's just one of the ones I've seen. There's one other that's really a big one and that one goes to fees they can charge. [09:02.000 --> 09:19.000] The fees they can charge are stipulated by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and in every case I've ever seen. [09:19.000 --> 09:23.000] Okay, before I say that, let me back up and ask you a question. [09:23.000 --> 09:36.000] At closing, did the lender put charges on the HUD 1 settlement statement, page 2 of the HUD 1 settlement statement? [09:36.000 --> 09:45.000] What were your closing costs? [09:45.000 --> 09:48.000] Okay, probably don't have that in your head, not a problem. [09:48.000 --> 09:51.000] Well, I don't, but I can pull up the one. [09:51.000 --> 10:11.000] At closing, did the lender provide documentation to show that the fees charged were not otherwise prohibited from being charged as a matter of law, that the fees charged were for services actually rendered, [10:11.000 --> 10:24.000] that the services were necessary, that the amounts charged were reasonable, and that the lender did not take an undisclosed markup on the amounts charged. [10:24.000 --> 10:32.000] Did you receive any documentation to support the amounts charged on HUD 1 settlement statement? [10:32.000 --> 10:34.000] I'll have to look through. [10:34.000 --> 10:36.000] In voices. [10:36.000 --> 10:49.000] I'll have to look through that documentation related to HUD, what I got at closing was a HUD appraised value disclosure, a HUD settlement statement, and addendum to HUD 1 settlement statement. [10:49.000 --> 10:50.000] Yeah. [10:50.000 --> 10:59.000] Okay, you didn't get a bunch of receipts from a bunch of vendors for services provided in the process of the closing? [10:59.000 --> 11:03.000] No. [11:03.000 --> 11:08.000] Then what I suggest is you add up all of the amounts on the HUD 1 settlement statement. [11:08.000 --> 11:30.000] You'll generally find that in line 1400, I think, and run an amortization on the note and then subtract the amount from the HUD 1 settlement statement from the note and reamortize it at the same payment amounts [11:30.000 --> 11:36.000] and see how much you would overpay the note over the full term. [11:36.000 --> 11:37.000] Okay. [11:37.000 --> 11:43.000] And then claim that against the lender as fraud. [11:43.000 --> 11:57.000] In fraud, you don't claim the amount you were actually defrauded of, so you don't claim how much they collected extra from you to the point of that you stop paying. [11:57.000 --> 12:04.000] You claim how much they would have stolen from you had their plan ran to fruition. [12:04.000 --> 12:05.000] I see. [12:05.000 --> 12:08.000] But you don't sue for that amount. [12:08.000 --> 12:10.000] You sue for triple. [12:10.000 --> 12:12.000] Yeah, three times. [12:12.000 --> 12:13.000] Okay. [12:13.000 --> 12:22.000] So this gives you a relative, you'll probably give you a claim against the lender in excess of the amount of the original principal. [12:22.000 --> 12:26.000] Then you can claim recision and tender by set off. [12:26.000 --> 12:38.000] If you claim recision, you have to tender back to the bar or what the lender, what the lender gave to you and all the money he gave to you. [12:38.000 --> 12:40.000] And he'll tender back to you the note. [12:40.000 --> 12:46.000] Can I do recision even though they've supposedly sold the property to somebody else and... [12:46.000 --> 12:51.000] Well, yeah, fraud doesn't go away because they supposedly sold the property. [12:51.000 --> 12:52.000] Okay. [12:52.000 --> 12:59.000] What you'll go back and do is maintain that first you need to look at the public record. [12:59.000 --> 13:12.000] You've got MERS in the deed of trust, but no signature by the borrower or by the lender authorizing the concessions that would have to be granted by the lender. [13:12.000 --> 13:17.000] So that would render MERS section void. [13:17.000 --> 13:23.000] Even if that weren't the case, there's another problem with that. [13:23.000 --> 13:45.000] Under the paragraph titled transfer of property rights, and it may not have that title on it in a FHA loan, but it's down there just before there's a section that shows the property description, a paragraph above it, will assign the property to the trustee. [13:45.000 --> 13:55.000] And what it assigns to the trustee is legal title because the lender holds equitable title, makes him the beneficiary. [13:55.000 --> 13:58.000] He gets the benefit from the payments. [13:58.000 --> 14:07.000] The trustee gets legal title so that if there's a default, it is the trustee who transfers legal title. [14:07.000 --> 14:18.000] But hold on, there's another paragraph right after that one that starts with together with. [14:18.000 --> 14:34.000] In a non-MERS document, that'll say together with that from the previous paragraph that assigns the property to the lender, it assigns the property together with all improvements. [14:34.000 --> 14:42.000] So that any improvements you make on the property become part of this security. [14:42.000 --> 14:47.000] If MERS is in the document, they add something in there. [14:47.000 --> 14:49.000] Yeah, the MERS title. [14:49.000 --> 14:51.000] Go ahead. [14:51.000 --> 14:52.000] Go ahead. [14:52.000 --> 15:00.000] It says borrower understands and agrees that MERS holds only legal title to the interest granted by borrower in the security instrument. [15:00.000 --> 15:05.000] Okay, what does that do to the trustee? [15:05.000 --> 15:11.000] Well, the trustee and MERS can't both have full legal title. [15:11.000 --> 15:20.000] Okay, now let's go to I think it's 2202 of the business commerce code. [15:20.000 --> 15:28.000] I think I'm not sure it was 2202 of the, I think it's 2202 or 2302 of the dog, but I have to look it up again. [15:28.000 --> 15:46.000] But there's a section in the commerce code that forbids the lender from requiring the borrower to transfer the property held as collateral to the lender. [15:46.000 --> 15:50.000] Now, in a mortgage state, that's exactly what they do. [15:50.000 --> 15:54.000] But in Texas, that is forbidden. [15:54.000 --> 16:04.000] So the deed of trust calls MERS the beneficiary that grants them equitable title. [16:04.000 --> 16:14.000] And then in this next paragraph, it says, oh, they don't really have equitable title, they have legal title, but it granted legal title to the trustee. [16:14.000 --> 16:16.000] And that was the idea. [16:16.000 --> 16:34.000] But in this one, it's the clear intent of the language of the document that legal title and equitable title be bestowed in the lender in its own right and through MERS as its nominee. [16:34.000 --> 16:39.000] That is a specific violation of Texas business commerce code. [16:39.000 --> 16:44.000] Okay, we really need to move along and got two more callers and Steven has really been hanging in there. [16:44.000 --> 16:46.000] Well, I could do this all night. [16:46.000 --> 16:53.000] And if you want to hang on, Johnny, if we don't get any more calls after this one, we'll pick this back up. [16:53.000 --> 16:54.000] Okay. [16:54.000 --> 16:55.000] Okay. [16:55.000 --> 17:20.000] We'll come back on the other side. We'll see. [17:20.000 --> 17:28.000] It's called Tangy Tangerine and we're all great in Tangy Tangerine. [17:28.000 --> 17:30.000] Tangy Tangerine. [17:30.000 --> 17:32.000] Tangy Tangerine. [17:32.000 --> 17:36.000] We're all great in Tangy Tangerine. [17:36.000 --> 17:38.000] Tangy Tangerine. [17:38.000 --> 17:40.000] Tangy Tangerine. [17:40.000 --> 17:48.000] Order beyond Tangy Tangerine and other great young Jevity products at LogosRadioNetwork.com by clicking on the Tangy Tangerine banner. [17:48.000 --> 17:55.000] Sign up as a preferred customer for wholesale prices or become a distributor and support LogosRadioNetwork.com. [17:55.000 --> 17:57.000] So what do you say, Elvis? [17:57.000 --> 17:58.000] I hear. [17:58.000 --> 18:00.000] I hear very much. [18:00.000 --> 18:05.000] Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits? [18:05.000 --> 18:09.000] Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mearris proven method. [18:09.000 --> 18:14.000] Michael Mearris has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two. [18:14.000 --> 18:20.000] You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes. [18:20.000 --> 18:24.000] What to do when contacted by phones, mail or court summons. [18:24.000 --> 18:26.000] How to answer letters and phone calls. [18:26.000 --> 18:29.000] How to get debt collectors out of your credit report. [18:29.000 --> 18:33.000] How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. [18:33.000 --> 18:38.000] The Michael Mearris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. [18:38.000 --> 18:40.000] Personal consultation is available as well. [18:40.000 --> 18:49.000] For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mearris banner or email MichaelMearris at yahoo.com. [18:49.000 --> 19:11.000] That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors next. [19:11.000 --> 19:20.000] Well, don't let nothing get to you. Only the father can do it by you. And don't let bad-mine people hurt you. [19:20.000 --> 19:23.000] I just say it's a get-behind. [19:23.000 --> 19:28.000] You know what I mean? My friend and all our judges. [19:28.000 --> 19:43.000] Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rule of Law Radio, and we're talking to... [19:43.000 --> 19:50.000] We're gonna go to Stephen in Texas. Steve, what do you have for us tonight? [19:50.000 --> 19:56.000] If y'all got me on this other line now, didn't you hear me now? [19:56.000 --> 19:58.000] I can hear you now. [19:58.000 --> 20:02.000] Perfect. I had to change to a mobile phone. I was hoping y'all still had me in the system. [20:02.000 --> 20:10.000] Thank you, sir. I've got it easy for you, and you're the best source of where to go for information on those. [20:10.000 --> 20:18.000] So, I had to step through a... I believe a family court is somewhat of the... Family court is administrative... [20:18.000 --> 20:22.000] They operate it out of a county court at law. [20:22.000 --> 20:27.000] Yeah. Add law. No, that's not an administrative court. That's a statutory court. [20:27.000 --> 20:30.000] Okay, so they're... [20:30.000 --> 20:36.000] There's a county court, which is the county commissioner's court, and then there's the county court at law. [20:36.000 --> 20:42.000] That's the one that adjudicates civil and criminal issues. [20:42.000 --> 20:45.000] Okay, so they do both. [20:45.000 --> 20:56.000] I'm unfamiliar where to... If I even have an option available, my wife and I were specifically kept out of a hearing. [20:56.000 --> 21:05.000] We were not allowed... We were not made party to the suit that CPS brought against a brother of hers that we had care of for eight years. [21:05.000 --> 21:12.000] They brought back his parents, his original biological parents. [21:12.000 --> 21:15.000] One had abandoned them seven years ago. They drug her. [21:15.000 --> 21:21.000] The last time I checked, that's called abandonment, and I've read the statute on that. [21:21.000 --> 21:30.000] They drug up the father. The father had legally relinquished all his rights and was sworn after David eight years ago. [21:30.000 --> 21:39.000] And even if he was able to, he wouldn't be allowed because he was now a sex offender and he's barred from having any of his children. [21:39.000 --> 21:49.000] But both of those two stooges up there in front of the judge and acted like they were the legal guardians, somehow, and just completely ignored what we had done for the kids for eight years, [21:49.000 --> 21:53.000] and then they put them in against... So I'm getting too far in this. [21:53.000 --> 22:03.000] Anyway, is there any way for us to put on the record while we're not made a party to the case, certain lies that we know are on the record? [22:03.000 --> 22:15.000] There are some copies of the record being made that will pick up on Monday, but I want to go through the time to come and note all the places that we can find the CPS that lies before the court. [22:15.000 --> 22:19.000] No, none truth, and I'm going to get their records also. [22:19.000 --> 22:24.000] Okay, you're saying that CPS officers lied to the court? [22:24.000 --> 22:31.000] Yes, I'm sure that's not an heard of it anyway, but yes, I'm saying they knowingly perpetrated a fraud upon the court. [22:31.000 --> 22:35.000] Then that's criminal straight up. [22:35.000 --> 22:41.000] Official misconduct, aggravated perjury. [22:41.000 --> 22:48.000] Did they file any documentation with false statements in them? [22:48.000 --> 22:50.000] Well, I'm not sure yet. [22:50.000 --> 22:57.000] They were making copies today, and we weren't able to get up there in time to get them, but of everything that was filed on the case. [22:57.000 --> 23:01.000] Okay. [23:01.000 --> 23:06.000] Okay, have you petitioned for a transcript? [23:06.000 --> 23:07.000] Yes. [23:07.000 --> 23:11.000] Oh, wait, how old are the children? [23:11.000 --> 23:18.000] The one boring question is 16 currently and turning 17 a matter of weeks. [23:18.000 --> 23:24.000] However, he is 16 when this court hearing transpired yesterday. [23:24.000 --> 23:29.000] Okay, are they, whose custody are they in? [23:29.000 --> 23:35.000] They have now been turned over to another sibling, my wife's sister. [23:35.000 --> 23:39.000] This is the half brother of both of these girls. [23:39.000 --> 23:48.000] And against all warnings from the psychologist and such that we've had him through and the children's home that he's been through, all known documentation. [23:48.000 --> 23:56.000] And we also submitted the time to the cops that, excuse me, the sheriff's department's been out and known charges against him. [23:56.000 --> 23:59.000] That he is not to be around children or other things. [23:59.000 --> 24:01.000] We had to move him outside. [24:01.000 --> 24:05.000] Okay, you're saying they gave them to a pedophile? [24:05.000 --> 24:14.000] No, I'm saying that they put him in the household of a sibling with four other little girls that are also siblings. [24:14.000 --> 24:21.000] And there's also a history of family and sexual problems in this family's history. [24:21.000 --> 24:29.000] So they knowingly put him in a house when they were successful and warned in multiple documentation and by us and they have files on the home that they put him in. [24:29.000 --> 24:31.000] And they put him in their home. [24:31.000 --> 24:34.000] Why did they take him out of your home? [24:34.000 --> 24:40.000] He was of a substantial harm to my children and I could not keep him in the home anymore. [24:40.000 --> 24:44.000] I had him staying outside of the home in a poplar trailer. [24:44.000 --> 24:50.000] Now they'd come in and eat, they'd come in and do their chores only under supervision and then they had to spend the night out there. [24:50.000 --> 24:55.000] And at any time that we weren't going to be able to supervise, we had to be out of the house. [24:55.000 --> 24:56.000] Okay. [24:56.000 --> 25:01.000] I'm liable if he does something again to one of my children. [25:01.000 --> 25:04.000] If I have knowledge that he has done these things. [25:04.000 --> 25:09.000] Okay, I'm not clear on what the issue is here. [25:09.000 --> 25:17.000] I'm trying to see if there's any way I can put forth in the record of the case that they brought forth. [25:17.000 --> 25:21.000] Like I said, they brought the only fraudulent things. [25:21.000 --> 25:22.000] Okay. [25:22.000 --> 25:23.000] Okay. [25:23.000 --> 25:32.000] If that's the issue, if you have knowledge that someone has committed a crime, you have a duty to report. [25:32.000 --> 25:39.000] And in so doing, that is privileged communication, so you can't be harmed by it. [25:39.000 --> 25:46.000] The crime should be reported to some magistrates. [25:46.000 --> 25:48.000] Every judge is a magistrate. [25:48.000 --> 25:53.000] I can almost put it back in front of the judge in the form of a criminal complaint who heard it. [25:53.000 --> 25:57.000] He's the one that was lied to. [25:57.000 --> 26:01.000] That would probably be a good one to put it in front of. [26:01.000 --> 26:03.000] And you make up a criminal affidavit. [26:03.000 --> 26:08.000] Look on, I have a website, jurisimprudence.com. [26:08.000 --> 26:10.000] Oh, yes, I used yours. [26:10.000 --> 26:14.000] I used yours before when I laid charges against my county of prison. [26:14.000 --> 26:15.000] Oh, okay. [26:15.000 --> 26:17.000] Go there. [26:17.000 --> 26:20.000] Pull down the form for the criminal complaint. [26:20.000 --> 26:28.000] Look up, I think it's 2204, his aggravated projury. [26:28.000 --> 26:31.000] That Texas penal code. [26:31.000 --> 26:32.000] That's in the paper. [26:32.000 --> 26:33.000] Okay. [26:33.000 --> 26:37.000] There's where I was having trouble with this time for which one this falls under. [26:37.000 --> 26:38.000] Yeah. [26:38.000 --> 26:44.000] If they made the statement in open court, then it's aggravated projury. [26:44.000 --> 26:57.000] If they wrote the statement in a document, an affidavit, or any other kind of government document, any other kind of document that was filed with the court, [26:57.000 --> 27:01.000] then that would be tampered with a government document. [27:01.000 --> 27:11.000] Creating the document and putting on the document a statement they knew to be false intent and intended to be taken as false. [27:11.000 --> 27:18.000] And then having that document validated by a notary is aggravated projury. [27:18.000 --> 27:27.000] And sending that document to the court, that's tampered with a government document, that's two separate offenses. [27:27.000 --> 27:31.000] Both of them felonies. [27:31.000 --> 27:35.000] What if they're knowing we would have held evidence? [27:35.000 --> 27:39.000] That's obstruction of justice, 3,606. [27:39.000 --> 27:42.000] Okay. [27:42.000 --> 27:48.000] So it's time we start taking these people to task if they want to play fast and loose. [27:48.000 --> 27:58.000] And I'm not quite, you know, I get a lot of negative stuff about protective services, child protective services. [27:58.000 --> 28:09.000] But a lot of the times when I look deeper, the criticism against child protective services is often misplaced. [28:09.000 --> 28:19.000] And the thing that got me to pay more attention to this was I had a friend that I knew for years and she got a job in child protective services. [28:19.000 --> 28:25.000] And I saw her a couple years later and asked her how her job was going and she said she had to quit. [28:25.000 --> 28:32.000] She tried to get these a two-year-old and a three-year-old away from this drug addict family. [28:32.000 --> 28:40.000] And she could not get the judge to remove them and it was in the winter and cold and the two-year-old got out on the porch. [28:40.000 --> 28:42.000] The three-year-old went out to get her. [28:42.000 --> 28:44.000] They both got locked out on the porch. [28:44.000 --> 28:53.000] And while their parents were passed out in a drug induced stupor, those two babies rose to death on the porch. [28:53.000 --> 28:56.000] It just broke her heart. [28:56.000 --> 29:01.000] She said she absolutely could not do this. [29:01.000 --> 29:09.000] So there, and I had someone come to me claiming a preacher had come to him, who ministers in and does. [29:09.000 --> 29:17.000] They told me they wanted to do something about child protective services, trying to take these people's kids away from them. [29:17.000 --> 29:29.000] And I said, Kim, have that preacher go back and talk to child protective services before he comes out here and starts turning them into demons. [29:29.000 --> 29:31.000] Because she may not have the whole story. [29:31.000 --> 29:33.000] And he went back. [29:33.000 --> 29:42.000] He'd come back later and he said, you're not as dumb as everybody says you are that he talked to child protective services and got a whole different attitude. [29:42.000 --> 29:48.000] So before we start going after, you might want to talk to them. [29:48.000 --> 29:53.000] And they may have information you're not aware of. [29:53.000 --> 29:59.000] Okay, hold on, hold on, we'll be right back. [29:59.000 --> 30:05.000] This is Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11. [30:05.000 --> 30:07.000] The government says that fire brought it down. [30:07.000 --> 30:12.000] However, 1500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition. [30:12.000 --> 30:15.000] Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives. [30:15.000 --> 30:18.000] And thousands of my fellow force respond as they die. [30:18.000 --> 30:19.000] I'm not a conspiracy theorist. [30:19.000 --> 30:20.000] I'm a structural engineer. [30:20.000 --> 30:21.000] I'm a New York City correctional. [30:21.000 --> 30:22.000] I'm an Air Force pilot. [30:22.000 --> 30:24.000] I'm the father who lost his son. [30:24.000 --> 30:25.000] We're Americans. [30:25.000 --> 30:27.000] And we deserve the truth. [30:27.000 --> 30:53.000] Thank you. [30:53.000 --> 31:19.000] Thank you. [31:19.000 --> 31:45.000] Thank you. [31:45.000 --> 32:11.000] Thank you. [32:11.000 --> 32:24.000] Thank you. [32:24.000 --> 32:26.000] Okay, we are back. [32:26.000 --> 32:32.000] Randy Calton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rue La Radio, and Stephen. [32:32.000 --> 32:37.000] Didn't mean to sound difficult, but... [32:37.000 --> 32:45.000] Yeah, you were a little cryptic on what was actually going on. [32:45.000 --> 32:52.000] My whole purpose here is about bringing public officials to task. [32:52.000 --> 32:57.000] But we're not here just to clobber public officials. [32:57.000 --> 33:01.000] Sometimes they actually try to do the right thing. [33:01.000 --> 33:05.000] I had a judge yesterday when I was in court. [33:05.000 --> 33:09.000] He questioned me about why I was doing what I was doing. [33:09.000 --> 33:11.000] This is a foreclosure issue. [33:11.000 --> 33:14.000] And I'd taken a warranty deed to the property. [33:14.000 --> 33:16.000] And the judge was sharp. [33:16.000 --> 33:18.000] He figured out something else was going on. [33:18.000 --> 33:22.000] And I finally told him that I did a show on legal reform [33:22.000 --> 33:25.000] and showed people how to go after public officials. [33:25.000 --> 33:33.000] He said, does anyone ever call into your show and talk nice about us? [33:33.000 --> 33:36.000] He said, no. [33:36.000 --> 33:38.000] But I do sometimes. [33:38.000 --> 33:43.000] And my whole point is, is I don't consider all of them bad guys. [33:43.000 --> 33:47.000] I knew this woman in Child Protective Services. [33:47.000 --> 33:51.000] And while she was doing this, we would talk about it. [33:51.000 --> 33:55.000] And it was extremely difficult. [33:55.000 --> 34:00.000] They're in a position to where they're trying to protect these children. [34:00.000 --> 34:04.000] And you have to understand while they're trying to protect the children, [34:04.000 --> 34:06.000] they don't care if you get upset. [34:06.000 --> 34:08.000] They don't care if the parents get upset. [34:08.000 --> 34:10.000] They don't care about any of that stuff. [34:10.000 --> 34:12.000] They don't care about the children. [34:12.000 --> 34:21.000] And I thought about what it would be like to be a judge, a family law judge. [34:21.000 --> 34:31.000] And a good family law judge is likely to come out of the courtroom with both sides upset at him. [34:31.000 --> 34:33.000] Exactly. [34:33.000 --> 34:38.000] If he's done his job right, so it is a thankless, difficult job. [34:38.000 --> 34:48.000] So, you know, if they have clearly lied, then they belong in prison. [34:48.000 --> 34:58.000] Are you sure what you believe they've lied about were things they knew not to be true? [34:58.000 --> 35:01.000] That's the critical part. [35:01.000 --> 35:07.000] If somebody else has lied to them and they believe what somebody else has told them, [35:07.000 --> 35:11.000] and they come and repeat that, that's not perjury. [35:11.000 --> 35:17.000] That may be negligence, but it's not perjury. [35:17.000 --> 35:23.000] So, are you sure they acted deliberately and maliciously? [35:23.000 --> 35:29.000] I'm not saying it was malicious in the case that the fact that they did, they could not. [35:29.000 --> 35:35.000] After we disclosed all the documented problems in the psychological barracks, [35:35.000 --> 35:40.000] we had to go in just to put them in a home in which the home couldn't keep them. [35:40.000 --> 35:47.000] He was the only reason any of this ever came up because he came up with some scratches on his arm [35:47.000 --> 35:50.000] at the school counselor when he went in. [35:50.000 --> 35:52.000] Oh, yeah, well, I got scratched by my brother long ago. [35:52.000 --> 35:55.000] Well, nobody intentionally scratched the kid or anything. [35:55.000 --> 35:58.000] But of course, oh my goodness, in the day and age that we lived in, [35:58.000 --> 36:05.000] we're even spanking as a common some people's minds that started off this whole investigation. [36:05.000 --> 36:10.000] And by the time that they found out why everything was going on, [36:10.000 --> 36:15.000] they completely reversed the position and they said, we're sorry. [36:15.000 --> 36:17.000] They said, we understand. [36:17.000 --> 36:20.000] It was our children in the house that were little. [36:20.000 --> 36:22.000] We wouldn't have them in there either. [36:22.000 --> 36:26.000] They caught their children in a position they couldn't get out of. [36:26.000 --> 36:28.000] They could not find a place for them to go to. [36:28.000 --> 36:32.000] They did not have girls in the home or anything else. [36:32.000 --> 36:34.000] They couldn't find a place for them. [36:34.000 --> 36:38.000] In fact, they were saying, isn't there some home y'all found that can hold them? [36:38.000 --> 36:39.000] I said, no. [36:39.000 --> 36:43.000] Every home in the state, all the way from the boys' home to the Baptist homes, [36:43.000 --> 36:50.000] will not take kids with the problems we would have to disclose to which the point we were in. [36:50.000 --> 36:56.000] So with all the things that we had, they chose to put them in a home with another sibling [36:56.000 --> 36:58.000] that has multiple other little children, [36:58.000 --> 37:01.000] of which he's been specifically regarded that he should never be around, [37:01.000 --> 37:05.000] other children, supervised. [37:05.000 --> 37:07.000] Hey, that's just one hand. [37:07.000 --> 37:08.000] Yeah, okay. [37:08.000 --> 37:11.000] This is really a hard thing. [37:11.000 --> 37:16.000] And in these situations, you'll, you have, [37:16.000 --> 37:21.000] these are situations where you've probably got everybody involved [37:21.000 --> 37:27.000] trying to do the best things for these children. [37:27.000 --> 37:30.000] You probably have no bad guys here. [37:30.000 --> 37:32.000] Everybody trying to do the right thing, [37:32.000 --> 37:41.000] but everybody with different positions, perspectives, and agendas. [37:41.000 --> 37:43.000] It's hard to say how to fix this, [37:43.000 --> 37:50.000] but if someone has clearly and knowingly misrepresented the truth, [37:50.000 --> 37:56.000] then absolutely they should be followed. [37:56.000 --> 38:02.000] That's all I want, all I haven't done anything except for the fact I want the records. [38:02.000 --> 38:07.000] I want to go through it and I'll find any exact instance based off the transcript. [38:07.000 --> 38:09.000] And I want their files. [38:09.000 --> 38:12.000] They take me off enough when they interviewed my little daughter. [38:12.000 --> 38:13.000] It's cool without my knowledge. [38:13.000 --> 38:16.000] That really gets under my skin. [38:16.000 --> 38:21.000] Don't go talking to my little six-year-old girl without my knowledge. [38:21.000 --> 38:26.000] One thing, if you're going to be really effective, [38:26.000 --> 38:33.000] don't do anything when you're angry. [38:33.000 --> 38:37.000] It's hard not to do that. [38:37.000 --> 38:39.000] The police use that against us. [38:39.000 --> 38:40.000] They get us angry. [38:40.000 --> 38:42.000] They taunt us. [38:42.000 --> 38:48.000] And then when you react in any way, you're agitated. [38:48.000 --> 38:53.000] And once they accuse you of being agitated, you become totally discredited. [38:53.000 --> 38:56.000] They can say anything you want to. [38:56.000 --> 39:00.000] And the courts will believe them and pay no attention to you. [39:00.000 --> 39:05.000] So the first thing I do is try to get the officer agitated. [39:05.000 --> 39:07.000] I'm going to ask him why he's agitated. [39:07.000 --> 39:09.000] Are you taking steroids? [39:09.000 --> 39:17.000] I told one recently that I thought he was on steroids and he got really defensive. [39:17.000 --> 39:19.000] Why do you think I want steroids? [39:19.000 --> 39:26.000] Well, your skin is so tight, it looks like if I poked you with a pen, you'd pop like a tick. [39:26.000 --> 39:29.000] And he got really agitated. [39:29.000 --> 39:33.000] And then I told him that you're getting very agitated. [39:33.000 --> 39:35.000] Do you always get agitated as easy? [39:35.000 --> 39:39.000] And the guy went back to the car and had his partner come talk to me. [39:39.000 --> 39:42.000] So that was wonderful. [39:42.000 --> 39:48.000] But don't let him get you angry and don't act from anger. [39:48.000 --> 39:52.000] This lady told me when she interviewed me, she thought I was being condescending. [39:52.000 --> 39:57.000] When I told her she didn't understand what the laws were that she was predicting. [39:57.000 --> 39:58.000] That was fun. [39:58.000 --> 40:02.000] I had a good time when I was interviewing. [40:02.000 --> 40:05.000] It actually made my day when she told me I was best. [40:05.000 --> 40:10.000] She thought I would appreciate it if I wouldn't be so condescending. [40:10.000 --> 40:15.000] I took that as a compliment because she didn't know what she was talking about. [40:15.000 --> 40:18.000] She had to bring out what the letter of the law was. [40:18.000 --> 40:20.000] Excellent. [40:20.000 --> 40:26.000] And that's when the tables changed from having me under a microscope to the fact that we couldn't put the boy anywhere. [40:26.000 --> 40:30.000] And she had to finally admit that they couldn't find anywhere for him to go either, [40:30.000 --> 40:32.000] because they took custody still. [40:32.000 --> 40:35.000] All I was trying to do was have him in good faith. [40:35.000 --> 40:39.000] He is family regardless of his problems. [40:39.000 --> 40:43.000] Okay, well, I appreciate it. [40:43.000 --> 40:47.000] Okay, you are welcome and stay in touch. [40:47.000 --> 40:50.000] Let us know what happens, especially if you file criminal charges. [40:50.000 --> 40:53.000] I'd like to hear what the result is. [40:53.000 --> 41:00.000] Oh, they had an ex-partner hearing and removed my wife's temporary conservatorship without ever telling her. [41:00.000 --> 41:02.000] And they just came up with that. [41:02.000 --> 41:04.000] Apparently they did that eight months ago. [41:04.000 --> 41:05.000] But they never did. [41:05.000 --> 41:11.000] Have you read the family code? Is the code that allows them to do that? [41:11.000 --> 41:13.000] I have found one. [41:13.000 --> 41:16.000] I just read a heading earlier when I was looking. [41:16.000 --> 41:19.000] It said something about temporary ex-partner hearing. [41:19.000 --> 41:21.000] How can you just remove some? [41:21.000 --> 41:23.000] And if so, where were they going to put them? [41:23.000 --> 41:25.000] They had an ex-partner hearing to declare. [41:25.000 --> 41:26.000] No, that's okay. [41:26.000 --> 41:29.000] If we're talking about law, it's not about logic. [41:29.000 --> 41:31.000] It's about law. [41:31.000 --> 41:34.000] You can't mix the two. [41:34.000 --> 41:45.000] Does the law allow the judge to arbitrarily or based on some evidence, [41:45.000 --> 41:51.000] remove a trustee without consulting the trustee? [41:51.000 --> 41:54.000] I'm going to bet they do. [41:54.000 --> 41:56.000] Okay. [41:56.000 --> 42:00.000] Yeah, and we only go after what we can. [42:00.000 --> 42:05.000] And if they have the authority to do that, you can't go after them [42:05.000 --> 42:08.000] for having that authority because you can understand there will be [42:08.000 --> 42:13.000] circumstances where if the accusations are egregious enough, [42:13.000 --> 42:16.000] they should be able to do that. [42:16.000 --> 42:17.000] Well, yes, but... [42:17.000 --> 42:18.000] Anything? [42:18.000 --> 42:19.000] Nobody knew anything about it. [42:19.000 --> 42:21.000] And apparently they're just... [42:21.000 --> 42:24.000] CPS just came up with that last week that's supposed to label, [42:24.000 --> 42:26.000] hey, you're not even a conservator anymore. [42:26.000 --> 42:28.000] Congratulations. [42:28.000 --> 42:31.000] Okay, first thing you have to do, that's probably why you're excluded [42:31.000 --> 42:34.000] from the hearings because you have no standing. [42:34.000 --> 42:37.000] First thing you have to do is read the family code. [42:37.000 --> 42:39.000] I understand. [42:39.000 --> 42:44.000] We've got to know the code. [42:44.000 --> 42:46.000] Okay, I need to move along. [42:46.000 --> 42:48.000] We're about to go to break here. [42:48.000 --> 42:50.000] I understand you. [42:50.000 --> 42:53.000] Keep us up to date on what goes on. [42:53.000 --> 42:57.000] Okay, now we're going to go to Brian in Texas. [42:57.000 --> 43:01.000] Brian, I understand you have a question for me. [43:01.000 --> 43:02.000] Yes. [43:02.000 --> 43:03.000] Hi, Randy. [43:03.000 --> 43:05.000] I've got a little problem here. [43:05.000 --> 43:08.000] I've got a common problem with a person who wrote a hot check to me [43:08.000 --> 43:10.000] for a couple of hundred bucks over the holidays. [43:10.000 --> 43:13.000] I work part-time as a chauffeur, different private work, [43:13.000 --> 43:15.000] then a few weeks ago. [43:15.000 --> 43:21.000] I'm just considering contacting the DA to have them. [43:21.000 --> 43:24.000] DA do real good with that. [43:24.000 --> 43:32.000] When the DA collects hot checks, he gets to assess a fee, [43:32.000 --> 43:37.000] and that fee goes to his office expenses. [43:37.000 --> 43:40.000] So they really like going after hot checks. [43:40.000 --> 43:41.000] Hang on. [43:41.000 --> 43:42.000] We're going to break. [43:42.000 --> 43:45.000] This is Randy Kelton, Deputy Chief of the State of Craig. [43:45.000 --> 43:50.000] Our radio, our call in number 512-646-1984. [43:50.000 --> 43:51.000] Give us a call. [43:51.000 --> 43:53.000] Clint, John, I see you there. [43:53.000 --> 43:56.000] We will get to you when we're done with Brian. [43:56.000 --> 44:00.000] We'll be right back. [44:00.000 --> 44:03.000] Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? [44:03.000 --> 44:07.000] Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, [44:07.000 --> 44:10.000] the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course [44:10.000 --> 44:13.000] that will show you how in 24 hours, [44:13.000 --> 44:15.000] step by step. [44:15.000 --> 44:18.000] If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. [44:18.000 --> 44:22.000] If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. [44:22.000 --> 44:25.000] Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, [44:25.000 --> 44:27.000] and now you can too. [44:27.000 --> 44:30.000] Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney [44:30.000 --> 44:33.000] with 22 years of case-winning experience. [44:33.000 --> 44:35.000] Even if you're not in a lawsuit, [44:35.000 --> 44:38.000] you can learn what everyone should understand [44:38.000 --> 44:40.000] about the principles and practices [44:40.000 --> 44:42.000] that control our American courts. [44:42.000 --> 44:44.000] You'll receive our audio classroom, [44:44.000 --> 44:46.000] video seminar, tutorials, [44:46.000 --> 44:48.000] forms for civil cases, [44:48.000 --> 44:51.000] prosay tactics, and much more. [44:51.000 --> 44:54.000] Please visit ruleoflawradio.com [44:54.000 --> 44:56.000] and click on the banner. [44:56.000 --> 45:00.000] Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ. [45:00.000 --> 45:02.000] The Oklahoma City bombing, [45:02.000 --> 45:05.000] top 10 reasons to question the official story, [45:05.000 --> 45:06.000] reason number one, [45:06.000 --> 45:07.000] John Doe number two, [45:07.000 --> 45:09.000] and other accomplices. [45:09.000 --> 45:10.000] On the day of the bombing, [45:10.000 --> 45:12.000] nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh [45:12.000 --> 45:15.000] and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied [45:15.000 --> 45:17.000] by other perpetrators. [45:17.000 --> 45:19.000] The FBI and federal prosecutors [45:19.000 --> 45:21.000] insist that Tim McVeigh alone [45:21.000 --> 45:23.000] delivered the Ryder truck bomb to the Murrah building [45:23.000 --> 45:25.000] and detonated it. [45:25.000 --> 45:27.000] The only witness the government produced [45:27.000 --> 45:29.000] to place McVeigh at the building that morning, [45:29.000 --> 45:31.000] Dana Bradley, who lost her children [45:31.000 --> 45:33.000] and one of her legs in the bombing, [45:33.000 --> 45:35.000] testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, [45:35.000 --> 45:37.000] the fable John Doe number two, [45:37.000 --> 45:39.000] exiting the Ryder truck. [45:39.000 --> 45:41.000] While at least 15 other witnesses claim [45:41.000 --> 45:43.000] to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators [45:43.000 --> 45:44.000] the day of the bombing, [45:44.000 --> 45:47.000] no less than 226 witnesses [45:47.000 --> 45:49.000] placed him with other men [45:49.000 --> 45:51.000] in the days before the bombing, [45:51.000 --> 45:53.000] including when he rented the Ryder truck [45:53.000 --> 45:54.000] and in some cases, [45:54.000 --> 45:57.000] have positively identified the other perpetrators. [45:57.000 --> 45:58.000] For more information, [45:58.000 --> 46:24.000] please visit okcbombingtruth.com. [46:24.000 --> 46:44.000] Okay, we are back. [46:44.000 --> 46:46.000] Randy Kelton, Debbie Stephens, Eddie Craig, [46:46.000 --> 46:48.000] Real Law Radio, [46:48.000 --> 46:52.000] and we're talking to Brian in Tejas. [46:52.000 --> 46:58.000] So have you filed a check with the county attorney? [46:58.000 --> 46:59.000] No, not yet. [46:59.000 --> 47:01.000] I was just working on that. [47:01.000 --> 47:03.000] I'll be on it this weekend. [47:03.000 --> 47:05.000] I'll file it probably Monday. [47:05.000 --> 47:09.000] I'll get all the papers filled out. [47:09.000 --> 47:12.000] Well, you'll find the prosecutor [47:12.000 --> 47:16.000] is pretty vigorous about pursuing these [47:16.000 --> 47:18.000] because generally that's what they get [47:18.000 --> 47:20.000] new computers with [47:20.000 --> 47:22.000] new desks, [47:22.000 --> 47:24.000] and they can really dress their place up [47:24.000 --> 47:26.000] if they collect enough of these. [47:26.000 --> 47:27.000] Oh, good. [47:27.000 --> 47:28.000] I'd like to hear that. [47:28.000 --> 47:30.000] I hope they stick it through this guy. [47:30.000 --> 47:32.000] He shafted me over some work done [47:32.000 --> 47:34.000] just prior to the holidays. [47:34.000 --> 47:38.000] It was a holiday party service [47:38.000 --> 47:41.000] that I provided for show first service. [47:41.000 --> 47:43.000] And this guy, he's a real character. [47:43.000 --> 47:45.000] I looked him up finally on the web. [47:45.000 --> 47:47.000] Turns out he's got an FCC [47:47.000 --> 47:51.000] by a case against him two years ago [47:51.000 --> 47:53.000] for penny stock fraud. [47:53.000 --> 47:58.000] So I don't like the guy. [47:58.000 --> 48:02.000] So this is not new to him then? [48:02.000 --> 48:04.000] No. [48:04.000 --> 48:07.000] He's paid me a cash before [48:07.000 --> 48:09.000] except for this most recent time. [48:09.000 --> 48:10.000] He's dragging me on. [48:10.000 --> 48:12.000] I'm sure he's having a few laughs. [48:12.000 --> 48:14.000] He just sent me a text today [48:14.000 --> 48:16.000] asking if I would give him my account number [48:16.000 --> 48:18.000] so he could pull with the money. [48:18.000 --> 48:20.000] Yeah. [48:20.000 --> 48:22.000] And you're going to hold your breath [48:22.000 --> 48:24.000] till he forwards the money? [48:24.000 --> 48:25.000] Yeah. [48:25.000 --> 48:28.000] He wanted me to text my account number [48:28.000 --> 48:30.000] by info. [48:30.000 --> 48:32.000] So you got to be kidding me. [48:32.000 --> 48:34.000] Oh, he wants your account number [48:34.000 --> 48:36.000] so he can get into it. [48:36.000 --> 48:38.000] Take your money out and then give it back to you [48:38.000 --> 48:40.000] and you're all even. [48:40.000 --> 48:42.000] Right, right, right. [48:42.000 --> 48:44.000] Very thoughtful. [48:44.000 --> 48:47.000] Okay, do you have anything else for us? [48:47.000 --> 48:48.000] No, sir, that's it. [48:48.000 --> 48:49.000] That's all I wanted to know. [48:49.000 --> 48:50.000] Thank you very much. [48:50.000 --> 48:51.000] Okay, dope. [48:51.000 --> 48:52.000] Thank you, Brian. [48:52.000 --> 48:57.000] Okay, now we're going to go to Clint in Texas. [48:57.000 --> 48:59.000] Hello, Mr. Clint. [48:59.000 --> 49:00.000] Hey, Mr. Randy. [49:00.000 --> 49:02.000] How are you doing? [49:02.000 --> 49:04.000] I am doing good. [49:04.000 --> 49:06.000] You have a question or comment for us? [49:06.000 --> 49:08.000] Yes, sir, I do. [49:08.000 --> 49:11.000] I actually have an announcement. [49:11.000 --> 49:16.000] This is a call to march nationwide [49:16.000 --> 49:22.000] on state capitals on the 19th of this month. [49:22.000 --> 49:29.000] The website promoting this is guncontrolmorecrime.com. [49:29.000 --> 49:32.000] I heard this from a YouTuber. [49:32.000 --> 49:35.000] His name is Nutton Fancy. [49:35.000 --> 49:40.000] The man has 119 million views on YouTube, [49:40.000 --> 49:43.000] and it's very popular. [49:43.000 --> 49:48.000] He's more of the conservative branch, [49:48.000 --> 49:50.000] not so much libertarian, [49:50.000 --> 49:56.000] more into the rushland ball, [49:56.000 --> 49:59.000] Hannity Combs kind of Republican. [49:59.000 --> 50:03.000] So I think we're going to see more, [50:03.000 --> 50:05.000] if this thing becomes popular, [50:05.000 --> 50:07.000] I'm sure we're going to get that kind of a two-party crowd, [50:07.000 --> 50:09.000] you know, more of the two-party areas, [50:09.000 --> 50:13.000] but I just want to come on and let you guys know this. [50:13.000 --> 50:17.000] Okay, well, you kind of explain a little more [50:17.000 --> 50:22.000] about what this gathering is. [50:22.000 --> 50:25.000] It's, as far as I can tell, [50:25.000 --> 50:33.000] it's a response to the call from most liberal media [50:33.000 --> 50:41.000] to impose a ban on semi-automatic firearms. [50:41.000 --> 50:43.000] So I feel like that's, I think, [50:43.000 --> 50:45.000] it's a call to, like I said, not done. [50:45.000 --> 50:46.000] Wait. [50:46.000 --> 50:48.000] Semi-automatic? [50:48.000 --> 50:49.000] Yes. [50:49.000 --> 50:51.000] Yeah, absolutely. [50:51.000 --> 50:54.000] Then that would eliminate all of our nine, [50:54.000 --> 50:58.000] all the cops, nine millimeters and glocks. [50:58.000 --> 51:01.000] Well, I guess everybody has to go back to revolvers. [51:01.000 --> 51:07.000] You know, it's actually, I can't quite... [51:07.000 --> 51:09.000] This is kind of two branches, as far as I can tell. [51:09.000 --> 51:11.000] Like, you have your Piers Morgan, [51:11.000 --> 51:14.000] who is calling, as far as I can tell, [51:14.000 --> 51:15.000] kind of basing it off. [51:15.000 --> 51:16.000] I don't watch Piers Morgan, [51:16.000 --> 51:22.000] but basing off his interviewing of Alex Jones, [51:22.000 --> 51:28.000] he's calling for a ban on semi-auto rifles, [51:28.000 --> 51:37.000] mainly the AR-15 and probably the AK-47 semi-auto variant. [51:37.000 --> 51:39.000] So that's one group. [51:39.000 --> 51:42.000] And then there seems to be more of a, [51:42.000 --> 51:46.000] I can't identify the main promoter of this, [51:46.000 --> 51:51.000] but there seems to be a C or this undercurrent [51:51.000 --> 51:55.000] of a call for a ban on all semi-autos. [51:55.000 --> 51:58.000] I haven't identified a single promoter on that one, [51:58.000 --> 52:02.000] but that seems to be what's being called for, [52:02.000 --> 52:03.000] at least in the media. [52:03.000 --> 52:07.000] So this rally, this march is, as far as I can tell, [52:07.000 --> 52:12.000] it's more of a Republican, not quite, [52:12.000 --> 52:16.000] woken up person, not someone who's fully aware [52:16.000 --> 52:17.000] of what's going on politically, [52:17.000 --> 52:21.000] but someone who's more still trusting in, [52:21.000 --> 52:26.000] you know, your left-right paradigm. [52:26.000 --> 52:27.000] Okay, wait a minute. [52:27.000 --> 52:30.000] I'm kind of missing something here. [52:30.000 --> 52:34.000] You called about a gathering, [52:34.000 --> 52:38.000] and who are the people holding the gathering? [52:38.000 --> 52:40.000] That's the Second Amendment. [52:40.000 --> 52:45.000] Are they pro-gun control, against gun control? [52:45.000 --> 52:48.000] I'm not sure who's as watchous here. [52:48.000 --> 52:54.000] It's pro-Second Amendment, pro-firearms, anti-gun control. [52:54.000 --> 52:58.000] Okay, and they're against all these people [52:58.000 --> 52:59.000] you were talking about? [52:59.000 --> 53:01.000] Yeah, mainly it seems to be the media [53:01.000 --> 53:02.000] that's promoting it. [53:02.000 --> 53:05.000] I don't know of any. [53:05.000 --> 53:06.000] Go ahead. [53:06.000 --> 53:08.000] Okay, I just want to make sure I wasn't [53:08.000 --> 53:09.000] losing where you were at. [53:09.000 --> 53:13.000] So when is this, and where is this? [53:13.000 --> 53:15.000] Yes, sir, it is the 19th of this month. [53:15.000 --> 53:20.000] It's going to be nationwide at your state capitol. [53:20.000 --> 53:24.000] Okay, so for those in and around Austin, [53:24.000 --> 53:26.000] is there a particular place [53:26.000 --> 53:28.000] that they will meet at the state capitol, [53:28.000 --> 53:30.000] or do you not know? [53:30.000 --> 53:31.000] Yes, sir. [53:31.000 --> 53:34.000] Well, I'm sure it's going to be kind of the, [53:34.000 --> 53:35.000] as far as I can tell, [53:35.000 --> 53:38.000] it's usually people meet up on the, [53:38.000 --> 53:40.000] I guess it's the back. [53:40.000 --> 53:41.000] Maybe it's the front. [53:41.000 --> 53:45.000] It's those men, that main stairwell. [53:45.000 --> 53:47.000] Okay, they're right in front of Congress. [53:47.000 --> 53:49.000] That would be the front right there [53:49.000 --> 53:52.000] in the entryway in the front of the building. [53:52.000 --> 53:55.000] The back of the capitol building there [53:55.000 --> 53:57.000] is kind of hard to sort out. [53:57.000 --> 53:59.000] It goes in a lot of different directions. [53:59.000 --> 54:03.000] So at the capitol building on the 19th, [54:03.000 --> 54:05.000] do you have a time? [54:05.000 --> 54:08.000] At high noon. [54:08.000 --> 54:10.000] How appropriate. [54:10.000 --> 54:12.000] That's right. [54:12.000 --> 54:15.000] Okay. [54:15.000 --> 54:17.000] So yeah, I just want to make an announcement. [54:17.000 --> 54:20.000] I probably will try to call in again [54:20.000 --> 54:22.000] to remind folks, [54:22.000 --> 54:24.000] and I'll be out there with a sign, of course, [54:24.000 --> 54:27.000] making my stencils and making my sign, [54:27.000 --> 54:30.000] and yeah, [54:30.000 --> 54:32.000] I thought that was very appropriate [54:32.000 --> 54:34.000] to call in and let everyone know. [54:34.000 --> 54:36.000] And again, the audience, [54:36.000 --> 54:37.000] the information I'm getting this from [54:37.000 --> 54:39.000] is more mainstream conservative, [54:39.000 --> 54:44.000] not libertarian, not anyone. [54:44.000 --> 54:47.000] Well, this thing about Obama [54:47.000 --> 54:49.000] passing an executive order, [54:49.000 --> 54:52.000] I don't think he's going to do any such thing like that [54:52.000 --> 54:55.000] because of mainstream conservative America [54:55.000 --> 54:58.000] is not going to go for this. [54:58.000 --> 55:02.000] The statistics show [55:02.000 --> 55:04.000] that he won't win this one. [55:04.000 --> 55:08.000] There's way too many gun supporters, [55:08.000 --> 55:11.000] and if he tries this, the states, [55:11.000 --> 55:13.000] the local politicians are not going to have [55:13.000 --> 55:15.000] any alternative. [55:15.000 --> 55:18.000] They're going to have to prevent the feds [55:18.000 --> 55:21.000] from enforcing it in the states, [55:21.000 --> 55:23.000] but they'll wind up getting voted out [55:23.000 --> 55:25.000] office themselves. [55:25.000 --> 55:27.000] This is much too contentious an issue. [55:27.000 --> 55:30.000] And the majority of the American public [55:30.000 --> 55:34.000] understand that the remedy for gun violence [55:34.000 --> 55:37.000] is not trying to take guns away [55:37.000 --> 55:40.000] from honest people. [55:40.000 --> 55:43.000] Cremal's going to get him anyway. [55:43.000 --> 55:46.000] The best solution to gun violence [55:46.000 --> 55:49.000] is arm everybody. [55:49.000 --> 55:51.000] We're somewhere close to that. [55:51.000 --> 55:53.000] What I'm worried about is Obama, [55:53.000 --> 55:55.000] having won this second and last term, [55:55.000 --> 55:59.000] he has nothing to lose having trying [55:59.000 --> 56:03.000] to execute an order that doesn't get executed. [56:03.000 --> 56:06.000] I don't really see the negative side for him. [56:06.000 --> 56:08.000] I mean, it's... [56:08.000 --> 56:10.000] No, wait a minute. [56:10.000 --> 56:14.000] Obama is part of the Democratic Party, [56:14.000 --> 56:16.000] and he is not going to cut [56:16.000 --> 56:19.000] the Democratic Party's throat. [56:19.000 --> 56:22.000] If he issues an executive order, [56:22.000 --> 56:24.000] the Democrats would be obligated [56:24.000 --> 56:26.000] to support his order, [56:26.000 --> 56:28.000] and he'll wind up getting most of them [56:28.000 --> 56:31.000] voted out of office if he does that. [56:31.000 --> 56:34.000] He turned the gun lobby against them. [56:34.000 --> 56:39.000] The gun lobby is very large and very vocal. [56:39.000 --> 56:41.000] These local politicians [56:41.000 --> 56:44.000] are not going to want to have to take on that issue. [56:44.000 --> 56:46.000] I can't see him doing this. [56:46.000 --> 56:49.000] I can see him saber rattling, [56:49.000 --> 56:52.000] but to actually take that step, [56:52.000 --> 56:54.000] you know, we've had... [56:54.000 --> 56:56.000] You know, since I've been doing this show, [56:56.000 --> 56:58.000] we've had people call in [56:58.000 --> 57:00.000] all the horrible things that were going to happen, [57:00.000 --> 57:02.000] and most of them haven't. [57:02.000 --> 57:04.000] A few of them have. [57:04.000 --> 57:06.000] But as far as taking over and invading us [57:06.000 --> 57:09.000] and putting us in FEMA camps and all that, [57:09.000 --> 57:11.000] these things aren't happening. [57:11.000 --> 57:14.000] Obama may want to get rid of guns, [57:14.000 --> 57:18.000] but he just doesn't have the political clout now. [57:18.000 --> 57:21.000] There's not enough political will to get that done. [57:21.000 --> 57:24.000] Even with these... [57:24.000 --> 57:26.000] I don't know if they're false flags or not, [57:26.000 --> 57:28.000] but they sure seem that way. [57:28.000 --> 57:30.000] They seem very convenient [57:30.000 --> 57:34.000] for the gun control lobby. [57:34.000 --> 57:36.000] But I'm not concerned about it. [57:36.000 --> 57:38.000] I don't think it's going to happen [57:38.000 --> 57:41.000] every time one of these things occur. [57:41.000 --> 57:44.000] Instead of people [57:44.000 --> 57:47.000] tossing away their guns in disgust, [57:47.000 --> 57:49.000] what do they do? [57:51.000 --> 57:54.000] They go buy more. [57:54.000 --> 57:56.000] Because they understand the solution [57:56.000 --> 57:59.000] is to arm the honest people [57:59.000 --> 58:03.000] that principle that was shot in Connecticut. [58:03.000 --> 58:05.000] If she was armed, [58:05.000 --> 58:07.000] that would have been a whole different story. [58:07.000 --> 58:09.000] This is Randy Kelton, [58:09.000 --> 58:11.000] Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig with La Radio. [58:11.000 --> 58:13.000] Thank you, Clint. [58:13.000 --> 58:15.000] When we come back, we're going to go to Jeremy [58:15.000 --> 58:17.000] in Texas. [58:17.000 --> 58:19.000] And Francis, I see you there. [58:19.000 --> 58:21.000] We'll pick you up next. [58:21.000 --> 58:23.000] This is our top of the hour break, [58:23.000 --> 58:27.000] so we're going into our last hour. [58:27.000 --> 58:29.000] We'll surely build up at the end, [58:29.000 --> 58:31.000] so give us a call. [58:31.000 --> 58:33.000] 512-646-1984. [58:33.000 --> 58:35.000] We'll be right back. [58:49.000 --> 58:51.000] Would you like to make more [58:51.000 --> 58:53.000] definite progress in your walk with God? [58:53.000 --> 58:55.000] Bibles for America [58:55.000 --> 58:57.000] is offering a free study Bible [58:57.000 --> 58:59.000] and a set of free Christian books [58:59.000 --> 59:01.000] that can really help. [59:01.000 --> 59:03.000] The New Testament recovery version [59:03.000 --> 59:05.000] is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles [59:05.000 --> 59:07.000] available today. [59:07.000 --> 59:09.000] It's an accurate translation, [59:09.000 --> 59:11.000] and it contains thousands of footnotes [59:11.000 --> 59:13.000] that will help you to know God [59:13.000 --> 59:15.000] and to know the meaning of life. [59:15.000 --> 59:17.000] The free books are a three-volume set [59:17.000 --> 59:19.000] called Basic Elements of the Christian Life. [59:19.000 --> 59:21.000] Chapter by chapter, [59:21.000 --> 59:23.000] Basic Elements of the Christian Life [59:23.000 --> 59:25.000] is an accurate translation, [59:25.000 --> 59:27.000] growing in Christ and how to build up the church. [59:27.000 --> 59:29.000] To order your free New Testament [59:29.000 --> 59:31.000] recovery version [59:31.000 --> 59:33.000] and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, [59:33.000 --> 59:35.000] call Bibles for America [59:35.000 --> 59:39.000] toll-free at 888-551-0102. [59:39.000 --> 59:43.000] That's 888-551-0102. [59:43.000 --> 59:45.000] Or visit us online [59:45.000 --> 01:00:01.000] at bfa.org. [01:00:01.000 --> 01:00:03.000] Do you get jittery without your cell phone [01:00:03.000 --> 01:00:05.000] or iPod? If so, you may be suffering [01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:07.000] from what scientists now call [01:00:07.000 --> 01:00:09.000] gadget withdrawal. [01:00:09.000 --> 01:00:11.000] Dr. Cameron Albrecht, back with details [01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:13.000] on a study into Information [01:00:13.000 --> 01:00:15.000] and Deprivation Disorder next. [01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:45.000] As parents know, [01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:47.000] trying to keep a teenager [01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:49.000] off their computer or cell phone [01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:51.000] can result in a tantrum. [01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:53.000] But is it more than just petulance? [01:00:53.000 --> 01:00:55.000] A new study suggests young people [01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:57.000] may actually be experiencing gadget withdrawal, [01:00:57.000 --> 01:00:59.000] something akin to what drug addicts [01:00:59.000 --> 01:01:01.000] experience when they go cold turkey. [01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:03.000] Researchers had young people [01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:05.000] turn off cell phones, social networking, [01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:07.000] the Internet and TV for 24 hours [01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:09.000] and keep a diary. [01:01:09.000 --> 01:01:11.000] 20% described overwhelming cravings, [01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:13.000] 11% isolation, [01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:15.000] and 10% confusion and even [01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:17.000] deep depression. [01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:19.000] Digitized minds constantly scanning for a fix? [01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:21.000] Maybe it's time we pulled the plug [01:01:21.000 --> 01:01:23.000] on that smartphone. [01:01:23.000 --> 01:01:25.000] I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, [01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:27.000] the world's most private search engine. [01:01:33.000 --> 01:01:35.000] Listen up, mom and dad. [01:01:35.000 --> 01:01:37.000] Ditch those cigarettes and stop lighting up. [01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:39.000] If you care about your kids' brains, [01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:41.000] that is, I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht [01:01:41.000 --> 01:01:43.000] and I'll have the details on a new study [01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:45.000] on the dangers of secondhand smoke [01:01:45.000 --> 01:02:13.000] right after this. [01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:17.000] As if you needed another [01:02:17.000 --> 01:02:19.000] reason to quit smoking, [01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:21.000] here's one more. [01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:23.000] A new study shows kids exposed [01:02:23.000 --> 01:02:25.000] to secondhand smoke at home [01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:27.000] have lower IQs and do worse [01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:29.000] on achievement tests. [01:02:29.000 --> 01:02:31.000] Ohio researchers study more than [01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:33.000] 4,000 children age 6 to 16 [01:02:33.000 --> 01:02:35.000] and gave them math, reading [01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:37.000] and memory tests. [01:02:37.000 --> 01:02:39.000] The kids with higher blood levels of [01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:41.000] codeine, a breakdown product of nicotine, [01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:43.000] scored worse than their peers. [01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:45.000] Those kids' IQs were 2 to 5 [01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:47.000] points lower. [01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:49.000] So the next time you're tempted to flick that [01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:51.000] big, think twice. You maybe turn [01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:53.000] your kids' brain cells to ashes [01:02:53.000 --> 01:02:55.000] right along with that cigarette. [01:02:55.000 --> 01:02:57.000] I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, [01:02:57.000 --> 01:03:25.000] the world's most private search engine. [01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:35.000] I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht. [01:03:35.000 --> 01:03:53.000] I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht. [01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:55.000] Hey, we are back. [01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:57.000] We're in DeKalb and Devin Stevens at [01:03:57.000 --> 01:03:59.000] Crade, the rule of law radio, [01:03:59.000 --> 01:04:01.000] and we're going to Jeremy in Texas. [01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:03.000] Jeremy, [01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:05.000] you've got a couple of citations. [01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:07.000] Shame on you. [01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:09.000] Yeah, well, it's not even that simple. [01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:11.000] In fact, my brother, [01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:13.000] I'm already the truck driver who got [01:04:13.000 --> 01:04:15.000] a couple of citations. [01:04:15.000 --> 01:04:17.000] And I'm afraid [01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:19.000] I wanted to help them. [01:04:19.000 --> 01:04:21.000] I want to help them. [01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:23.000] It's just enough to get them in trouble. [01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:25.000] And so I wanted to call and [01:04:25.000 --> 01:04:27.000] discuss some stuff with you. [01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:29.000] Where did he get the [01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:31.000] citations at? [01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:33.000] Out in the country. [01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:35.000] It was a state [01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:37.000] trip that pulled him over. [01:04:37.000 --> 01:04:39.000] Oh, it's in Texas? [01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:41.000] Yes, sir. Yeah. [01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:43.000] Oh, okay. [01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:45.000] Nature of the citations? [01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:47.000] Okay. [01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:49.000] One of them was speeding and the other [01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:51.000] which I know is not true, [01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:53.000] but he claims that [01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:55.000] their little girl was not wearing her seat belt. [01:04:57.000 --> 01:04:59.000] In a big rig? [01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:01.000] No, no, they're private automobile. [01:05:01.000 --> 01:05:03.000] Oh, okay. [01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:05.000] So he just has a CDL. [01:05:05.000 --> 01:05:07.000] But I know my note here says [01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:09.000] it was... [01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:11.000] Okay, yeah, he has a CDL [01:05:11.000 --> 01:05:13.000] and is afraid if he gets these tickets, [01:05:13.000 --> 01:05:15.000] he may lose his job. [01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:17.000] Ah, okay. [01:05:17.000 --> 01:05:19.000] Well, he... [01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:21.000] Okay, has he... [01:05:21.000 --> 01:05:23.000] Have you listened to the Monday night [01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:25.000] show with Eddie Gray? [01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:27.000] Yes, I actually talked to Eddie a little bit, [01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:29.000] but [01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:31.000] some stuff developed since the last time I talked [01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:33.000] to him, and so I just wanted to call in [01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:35.000] see if I could get some advice. [01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:37.000] If Eddie was around, I'd like to talk to him [01:05:37.000 --> 01:05:39.000] or you, whatever. [01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:41.000] Eddie's not around tonight, [01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:43.000] but I generally [01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:45.000] don't address [01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:47.000] the traffic anymore [01:05:47.000 --> 01:05:49.000] since Eddie does that. [01:05:49.000 --> 01:05:51.000] He's a lot more knowledgeable specifically [01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:53.000] than I am. [01:05:53.000 --> 01:05:55.000] I take [01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:57.000] a little different approach than he does. [01:05:57.000 --> 01:05:59.000] I have a DOT number on my car. [01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:01.000] Okay. [01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:05.000] But if they look up the DOT number, [01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:07.000] they'll find that I'm registered with [01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:09.000] the Department [01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:11.000] of Transportation as a private [01:06:11.000 --> 01:06:13.000] operator, not in commerce. [01:06:15.000 --> 01:06:17.000] I do have a license. [01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:19.000] I can enter into commerce [01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:21.000] if I choose to, [01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:23.000] but they have noticed that I don't. [01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:27.000] Eddie doesn't take that [01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:29.000] tact, but [01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:31.000] if he's in his car, [01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:33.000] if he's not [01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:35.000] operating as a [01:06:35.000 --> 01:06:37.000] commercial driver, [01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:39.000] then he doesn't fall under [01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:41.000] and [01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:43.000] the speeding of all things [01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:45.000] is very specific [01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:47.000] in that it only applies [01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:49.000] to commercial. [01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:53.000] It depends on [01:06:53.000 --> 01:06:55.000] the jurisdiction. [01:06:55.000 --> 01:06:57.000] Generally, [01:06:57.000 --> 01:06:59.000] from my perspective, dealing [01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:01.000] with the traffic [01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:03.000] courts, if you look like [01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:05.000] you're really going to come after them, [01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:07.000] then they want the thing to go away. [01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:09.000] The last one, [01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:11.000] Help to Get Dropped, was a woman [01:07:11.000 --> 01:07:13.000] in Dow Worthington Gardens [01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:15.000] driving [01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:17.000] a vehicle [01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:19.000] out of New Hampshire [01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:21.000] with no [01:07:21.000 --> 01:07:23.000] proof of insurance [01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:25.000] and no safety sticker. [01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:27.000] The problem was [01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:29.000] in New Hampshire, you weren't [01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:31.000] required to have either one of those. [01:07:33.000 --> 01:07:35.000] And I went to court [01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:37.000] and the [01:07:37.000 --> 01:07:39.000] bailiff recognized me. [01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:43.000] He turned out he was a lawyer [01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:47.000] who came to Austin [01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:49.000] for [01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:53.000] the reserve training. [01:07:53.000 --> 01:07:55.000] He was a member of the reserves [01:07:55.000 --> 01:07:57.000] and he was doing this [01:07:57.000 --> 01:07:59.000] bailiff thing as a reserve officer. [01:07:59.000 --> 01:08:01.000] I'm sorry, I said [01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:03.000] reserve national guard. [01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:05.000] He was doing this bailiff thing [01:08:05.000 --> 01:08:07.000] as a reserve officer. A lot of these [01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:09.000] guys do that so they can carry a gun all the time. [01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:13.000] But he recognized [01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:15.000] who I was. I was talking to him [01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:17.000] and he said, wait a minute, I know [01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:19.000] you. He said [01:08:19.000 --> 01:08:21.000] A.M. Austin. [01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:23.000] Oh no, no, no, that could not [01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:25.000] be me. [01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:27.000] I'm F.M. Austin. I knew [01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:29.000] he was in [01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:31.000] Dallas. 90.1 [01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:33.000] is public radio. [01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:35.000] He was probably [01:08:35.000 --> 01:08:37.000] listening to 90.1 and then [01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:39.000] picked us up when he was in Austin. [01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:41.000] But he apparently liked [01:08:41.000 --> 01:08:43.000] what he heard because he listened [01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:45.000] to it. But [01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:47.000] I think he went and told the judge [01:08:47.000 --> 01:08:49.000] because [01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:51.000] I told this guy that [01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:53.000] I was going to file criminal charges [01:08:53.000 --> 01:08:55.000] against the officer [01:08:55.000 --> 01:08:57.000] for tampering the government document [01:08:57.000 --> 01:08:59.000] and angry the perjury. [01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:01.000] But they [01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:03.000] wound up dropping the case. [01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:05.000] But that's only because they were looking [01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:07.000] at having more difficulty [01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:09.000] than they wanted to deal with. [01:09:09.000 --> 01:09:11.000] I'm kind of hoping that that may be [01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:13.000] the situation here. [01:09:13.000 --> 01:09:15.000] A couple of years ago [01:09:15.000 --> 01:09:17.000] I got a citation [01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:19.000] and called into your show [01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:21.000] and after talking to Eddie [01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:23.000] I went and asked for a copy of what was in [01:09:23.000 --> 01:09:25.000] my file and they wanted me to plea. [01:09:25.000 --> 01:09:27.000] I got into a little [01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:29.000] back and forth with the [01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:31.000] people up there and [01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:33.000] anyway [01:09:33.000 --> 01:09:35.000] they told me to go home and they would mail me [01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:37.000] something and it's over two years later [01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:39.000] and I haven't heard back from them. [01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:41.000] You're probably [01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:43.000] going to have a warrant show up. [01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:47.000] I just got pulled over a few days ago [01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:49.000] by a sheriff's deputy and [01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:51.000] sent me back on my way. [01:09:51.000 --> 01:09:53.000] The thing about [01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:55.000] that is if you get a warrant [01:09:55.000 --> 01:09:57.000] for a traffic issue [01:09:57.000 --> 01:09:59.000] or a warrant of any kind [01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:01.000] the [01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:03.000] issuing entity [01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:05.000] will not [01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:07.000] register the warrant [01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:09.000] beyond [01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:11.000] a distance which they are [01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:13.000] prepared to transport. [01:10:13.000 --> 01:10:15.000] So if you get [01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:17.000] a traffic warrant in Houston [01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:19.000] and you get pulled over [01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:21.000] in Dallas [01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:23.000] or Austin they're not going to find a warrant. [01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:25.000] The last thing [01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:27.000] they want to happen [01:10:27.000 --> 01:10:29.000] is to have you arrested in Austin [01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:31.000] or Dallas and then they have to transport [01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:33.000] you down to Houston. [01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:35.000] That's going to make them real unhappy so they don't [01:10:35.000 --> 01:10:37.000] even post it. So if you were [01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:39.000] more than 15 or 20 miles [01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:41.000] a good chance [01:10:41.000 --> 01:10:43.000] to just put in post. This is [01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:45.000] you should watch [01:10:45.000 --> 01:10:47.000] a good chance it will [01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:49.000] show up. [01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:51.000] How would I go about finding out [01:10:51.000 --> 01:10:53.000] if I have a warrant? [01:10:53.000 --> 01:10:55.000] Call the jurisdiction and ask them [01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:57.000] what's the deal with this ticket. [01:10:57.000 --> 01:10:59.000] You might file [01:10:59.000 --> 01:11:01.000] a motion to dismiss too old [01:11:01.000 --> 01:11:03.000] to prosecute. [01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:05.000] Just send it to the court. [01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:07.000] Don't go there. Don't let them see you. [01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:09.000] Just send them a motion to dismiss too old [01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:11.000] to prosecute. And this will [01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:13.000] protect you in case [01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:15.000] they think about [01:11:15.000 --> 01:11:17.000] they may audit their books and say [01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:19.000] we got all these we didn't pursue and then [01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:21.000] send out warrants on everybody. [01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:23.000] Okay. [01:11:23.000 --> 01:11:25.000] So [01:11:25.000 --> 01:11:27.000] send them that motion and then if they try [01:11:27.000 --> 01:11:29.000] the warrant thing then you have [01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:31.000] at least a legal argument. [01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:33.000] Okay. [01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:35.000] All right. But as to your brother [01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:37.000] speeding and seat belt. [01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:39.000] Well [01:11:39.000 --> 01:11:41.000] okay. [01:11:41.000 --> 01:11:43.000] He got these citations and [01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:45.000] I told him we'll go up to [01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:47.000] the courthouse [01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:49.000] and see if you can get a copy [01:11:49.000 --> 01:11:51.000] of what's in your file. [01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:53.000] And so him and my sister, they went up there [01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:55.000] as my brother-in-law and my sister went up there. [01:11:55.000 --> 01:11:57.000] They [01:11:57.000 --> 01:11:59.000] asked for a copy of what was in the file. [01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:01.000] This is over a week after he got the tickets [01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:03.000] and [01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:05.000] there was no file. There was nothing in the file. [01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:07.000] And so they came back down. [01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:09.000] Anytime you do that you need to give them [01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:11.000] a written request. [01:12:11.000 --> 01:12:13.000] Okay. [01:12:13.000 --> 01:12:15.000] And have them respond [01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:17.000] to the request with we have no records [01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:19.000] responsive to your request. [01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:21.000] And it's probably a good idea [01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:23.000] to make up both. You make up a written [01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:25.000] request [01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:27.000] and then make up a response. [01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:29.000] You know, what I did with [01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:31.000] my information request [01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:33.000] was down at the bottom, I put [01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:35.000] a sentence they could check that says [01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:37.000] we have no records responsive to your request. [01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:39.000] And I could just check it off. [01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:41.000] Okay. [01:12:41.000 --> 01:12:43.000] Now you have [01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:45.000] hard evidence that on this day [01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:47.000] at this time there was no [01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:51.000] record. [01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:53.000] Okay. [01:12:53.000 --> 01:12:55.000] If your ticket said you must [01:12:55.000 --> 01:12:57.000] appear on it before you've [01:12:57.000 --> 01:12:59.000] peered in time and [01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:01.000] there was no charge against you, you have [01:13:01.000 --> 01:13:03.000] abided by your [01:13:03.000 --> 01:13:05.000] promise. [01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:07.000] And [01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:09.000] one of the things that happens a lot if you go [01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:11.000] on a ticket [01:13:11.000 --> 01:13:13.000] and [01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:15.000] there's a prosecutor but no judge. [01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:19.000] It's [01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:21.000] quite fun to charge the prosecutor with [01:13:21.000 --> 01:13:23.000] impersonating [01:13:23.000 --> 01:13:25.000] a judicial officer. [01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:27.000] Thank you. We're real excited over [01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:29.000] that. [01:13:29.000 --> 01:13:31.000] But I've done [01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:33.000] that a couple of times just for yucks. [01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:37.000] I was sure [01:13:37.000 --> 01:13:39.000] like to learn to do stuff like that. [01:13:39.000 --> 01:13:41.000] But [01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:43.000] it's easier than you think once you know [01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:45.000] your watch and know the law. [01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:49.000] They are the servants. You are not [01:13:49.000 --> 01:13:51.000] the servant. [01:13:51.000 --> 01:13:53.000] So [01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:55.000] you go in, you're the [01:13:55.000 --> 01:13:57.000] sovereign, you're the CEO, [01:13:57.000 --> 01:13:59.000] you need to act like one. [01:14:03.000 --> 01:14:05.000] Okay. [01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:07.000] Is your brother fighting this [01:14:07.000 --> 01:14:09.000] or are you trying to fight it for him? [01:14:09.000 --> 01:14:11.000] I think [01:14:11.000 --> 01:14:13.000] it's my brother-in-law and I guess my [01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:15.000] sister is more eager to fight this [01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:17.000] than he is. [01:14:17.000 --> 01:14:19.000] And I'd like to help if I could. [01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:21.000] You're not going to be able [01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:23.000] to help him. If he doesn't have [01:14:23.000 --> 01:14:25.000] the motivation to fight this thing, [01:14:25.000 --> 01:14:27.000] you're not going to be able to help him. [01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:29.000] Okay. [01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:31.000] It takes [01:14:31.000 --> 01:14:33.000] a willingness [01:14:33.000 --> 01:14:35.000] to fight for your rights. [01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:37.000] And if he [01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:39.000] doesn't have the will to do it, [01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:41.000] you're not going to be able to do it [01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:43.000] for him. [01:14:43.000 --> 01:14:45.000] Okay. [01:14:45.000 --> 01:14:47.000] The first thing you've got to do is get [01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:49.000] him wound up. [01:14:49.000 --> 01:14:51.000] Okay. [01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:53.000] And [01:14:53.000 --> 01:14:55.000] go ahead. [01:14:55.000 --> 01:14:57.000] No, I was just going to say [01:14:57.000 --> 01:14:59.000] while I have you, [01:14:59.000 --> 01:15:01.000] the situation has brought up several [01:15:01.000 --> 01:15:03.000] questions. [01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:05.000] I'm still trying to learn a lot. [01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:07.000] There's a lot I still need to learn. [01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:09.000] But going through [01:15:09.000 --> 01:15:11.000] what little bit we've done already has [01:15:11.000 --> 01:15:13.000] brought up a few questions on how to handle [01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:15.000] different situations. [01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:17.000] Okay, go ahead. [01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:19.000] Okay. [01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:21.000] They went in [01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:23.000] and asked for a copy of what was in the file. [01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:25.000] They told them there was nothing. So she came [01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:27.000] out and called me. [01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:29.000] So there's nothing in the file. [01:15:29.000 --> 01:15:31.000] I said, well, see if you can go in, be nice [01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:33.000] if they would just give you something in [01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:35.000] writing, stating that there's nothing on the [01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:37.000] file. Well, that didn't go anywhere. [01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:39.000] But then they went to lunch [01:15:39.000 --> 01:15:41.000] and then decided to go try it one more time. [01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:43.000] When they went back, [01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:45.000] now the judge was there this time. [01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:47.000] They [01:15:47.000 --> 01:15:49.000] went in [01:15:49.000 --> 01:15:51.000] and asked, well then right away [01:15:51.000 --> 01:15:53.000] that they wanted to have [01:15:53.000 --> 01:15:55.000] the judge took the bench. [01:15:55.000 --> 01:15:57.000] My brother [01:15:57.000 --> 01:15:59.000] and my sister walked in there [01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:01.000] and it was just the judge, [01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:03.000] Bailiff, [01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:05.000] Clerk, [01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:07.000] my sister and brother-in-law [01:16:07.000 --> 01:16:09.000] and the judge was pretty much demanding [01:16:09.000 --> 01:16:11.000] that they plead, or that he plead. [01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:13.000] And I'd already told them that that's probably not [01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:15.000] a good idea to plead. [01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:17.000] So they did not plead. [01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:19.000] The judge kind of got upset. My sister was [01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:21.000] asking if they had any [01:16:21.000 --> 01:16:23.000] if they could get [01:16:23.000 --> 01:16:25.000] something stating that there was [01:16:25.000 --> 01:16:27.000] nothing in the file. [01:16:27.000 --> 01:16:29.000] Well then they got to, supposedly [01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:31.000] I don't really believe this happened, but supposedly [01:16:31.000 --> 01:16:33.000] they got to hold up the officer. [01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:35.000] He sent in the information [01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:37.000] and so now they had [01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:39.000] to take it in front of them. [01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:41.000] Okay, okay. [01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:43.000] Hang on, we're about to go to break. This is [01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:45.000] for Randy Kelton, W. Stevens, Eddie Craig. [01:16:45.000 --> 01:16:47.000] Wheel of Law Radio, our call-in number [01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:49.000] 512-646-1984. [01:16:49.000 --> 01:16:59.000] We'll be right back. [01:16:59.000 --> 01:17:01.000] At Capital Coin in Boolean, [01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:03.000] our mission is to be your preferred [01:17:03.000 --> 01:17:05.000] shopping destination by delivering excellent [01:17:05.000 --> 01:17:07.000] customer service and outstanding value [01:17:07.000 --> 01:17:09.000] at an affordable price. [01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:11.000] Capital Coin features a great selection [01:17:11.000 --> 01:17:13.000] of high quality coins and fresh metals. [01:17:13.000 --> 01:17:15.000] In addition to providing the best prices [01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:17.000] in the nation, we want to bring you the [01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:19.000] best shopping experience both in-store [01:17:19.000 --> 01:17:21.000] and online. [01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:23.000] In addition to coins in Boolean, we carry [01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:25.000] popular young Jevity products such as [01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:27.000] Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Roast. [01:17:27.000 --> 01:17:29.000] We offer freeze-dried, storeable foods [01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:31.000] by Augustin Farms, Bergy Water Products, [01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:33.000] ammunition at 10% above wholesale [01:17:33.000 --> 01:17:35.000] and more. You can lock in a [01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:37.000] spot trace with our Silver Pool [01:17:37.000 --> 01:17:39.000] and we set up metals IRA accounts. [01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:41.000] Call us at 512-646-644-0 [01:17:41.000 --> 01:17:43.000] for more details. [01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:45.000] We're located at 7304 [01:17:45.000 --> 01:17:47.000] Burnett Road, SW [01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:49.000] about a half mile south of Amersham. [01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:51.000] We're open Monday through Friday 10-6 [01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:53.000] Saturdays 10-2. [01:17:53.000 --> 01:17:55.000] Visit us at CapitalCoininBoolean.com [01:17:55.000 --> 01:17:57.000] or call 512-646-644-0 [01:18:03.000 --> 01:18:05.000] Hey Tangy Tangerine [01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:07.000] see what you've done to me [01:18:07.000 --> 01:18:09.000] I'm losing weight [01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000] and I'm not a half the man I used to be [01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:17.000] Hey Tangy Tangerine [01:18:17.000 --> 01:18:19.000] you make me feel so good [01:18:19.000 --> 01:18:23.000] I don't eat so much food [01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:25.000] ain't I a sight compared to [01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:29.000] what I used to be [01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:31.000] calcium, magnesium, [01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:33.000] selenium and zinc [01:18:33.000 --> 01:18:37.000] take a moment now and think [01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:39.000] if you have a little friend [01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:41.000] every day will bring [01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:45.000] the life that you've been looking for [01:18:45.000 --> 01:18:47.000] Beyond Tangy Tangerine [01:18:47.000 --> 01:18:49.000] is available at Brave New Books [01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:51.000] located at 1904 [01:18:51.000 --> 01:18:53.000] Quantum Loop Street [01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:55.000] The bookstore also carries the works of [01:18:55.000 --> 01:18:57.000] Dr. Joel Wallach, [01:18:57.000 --> 01:18:59.000] founder of Young Jevity [01:18:59.000 --> 01:19:01.000] and creator of Beyond Tangy Tangerine [01:19:01.000 --> 01:19:03.000] This is [01:19:03.000 --> 01:19:05.000] the Logos [01:19:05.000 --> 01:19:07.000] Radio [01:19:07.000 --> 01:19:09.000] Network [01:19:09.000 --> 01:19:35.000] Oh, come on. [01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:37.000] Okay, we are back [01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:39.000] Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, [01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:41.000] Ruevlar Radio, and we're talking to [01:19:41.000 --> 01:19:45.000] Jeremy in Texas [01:19:45.000 --> 01:19:47.000] and [01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:49.000] last thing you were saying about [01:19:49.000 --> 01:19:51.000] the [01:19:51.000 --> 01:19:53.000] bailiff [01:19:53.000 --> 01:19:55.000] oh, they said they got a hold of the police officer [01:19:55.000 --> 01:19:57.000] and they got the ticket [01:19:57.000 --> 01:19:59.000] Yes, the ticket was [01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:01.000] the judge said that the ticket was now [01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:03.000] in the file [01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:05.000] so my sister asked for it [01:20:05.000 --> 01:20:07.000] the judge said that's all she can give her [01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:09.000] is to copy the ticket [01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:11.000] and then they kind of got distracted [01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:13.000] in some other conversation [01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:15.000] my sister recorded this so I got to listen to it [01:20:15.000 --> 01:20:17.000] got distracted in some other conversation [01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:19.000] and she ended up not getting the ticket [01:20:21.000 --> 01:20:23.000] but I'd like to know [01:20:23.000 --> 01:20:25.000] how that should have been handled [01:20:25.000 --> 01:20:27.000] you know with [01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:29.000] if I understand right [01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:31.000] there has to be a prosecutor there, right [01:20:31.000 --> 01:20:33.000] to be able to hold any sort of a hearing [01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:35.000] actually [01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:37.000] no [01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:39.000] a [01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:41.000] JP [01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:43.000] or magistrate can hold an examining trial [01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:45.000] without a prosecutor [01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:47.000] and what they're treating [01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:49.000] this appearance as is not [01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:51.000] an examining trial but an [01:20:51.000 --> 01:20:53.000] arraignment [01:20:53.000 --> 01:20:55.000] an arraignment is essentially [01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:57.000] not adversarial [01:20:57.000 --> 01:20:59.000] so it doesn't need a prosecutor [01:20:59.000 --> 01:21:01.000] as in [01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:03.000] nothing is adjudicated [01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:05.000] at an arraignment hearing [01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:07.000] an arraignment hearing [01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:09.000] is a hearing held for the purpose [01:21:09.000 --> 01:21:11.000] of determining [01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:13.000] the identity of the accused [01:21:13.000 --> 01:21:15.000] and taking a plea [01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:17.000] that's all it does [01:21:17.000 --> 01:21:19.000] so it's not considered adversarial [01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:21.000] so a prosecutor doesn't need to be there [01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:23.000] okay that's all she's trying to do [01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:25.000] let's get a plea out of [01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:27.000] yeah and [01:21:27.000 --> 01:21:29.000] what he should have done [01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:31.000] is held an examining trial [01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:35.000] and in an examining trial [01:21:35.000 --> 01:21:37.000] you had a right to face the witness against you [01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:39.000] and examine the witness [01:21:41.000 --> 01:21:43.000] they don't do examining trials [01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:45.000] as a matter of course and I think we should [01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:47.000] be filing criminal charges [01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:49.000] and judicial conduct complaints against them [01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:51.000] as a matter of course [01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:53.000] was this a JP [01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:55.000] or municipal judge [01:21:55.000 --> 01:21:57.000] JP [01:21:57.000 --> 01:21:59.000] okay JP's are a little [01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:01.000] more immune but they are terrified [01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:03.000] of judicial conduct complaints [01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:07.000] JP's and municipal judges [01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:09.000] think [01:22:09.000 --> 01:22:11.000] that the [01:22:11.000 --> 01:22:13.000] State Commission on Judicial Conduct [01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:15.000] doesn't [01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:17.000] sanction [01:22:17.000 --> 01:22:19.000] higher level executive judges [01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:21.000] and in order to make it [01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:23.000] look like to the public they're doing something [01:22:23.000 --> 01:22:25.000] they tend to crucify [01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:27.000] JP [01:22:27.000 --> 01:22:29.000] and municipal judges [01:22:29.000 --> 01:22:31.000] because they're inferior court judges [01:22:33.000 --> 01:22:35.000] and they're white they do [01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:37.000] that's exactly [01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:39.000] what the commission does [01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:41.000] so they're terrified of it [01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:43.000] I have, Kim's brother was [01:22:43.000 --> 01:22:45.000] a municipal judge and [01:22:45.000 --> 01:22:47.000] he was terrified [01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:49.000] of judicial conduct complaints [01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:51.000] because [01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:53.000] he's afraid that the commission's [01:22:53.000 --> 01:22:55.000] going to come out there and just tear him a [01:22:55.000 --> 01:22:57.000] new one because he's [01:22:57.000 --> 01:22:59.000] a municipal judge [01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:01.000] and he's [01:23:01.000 --> 01:23:03.000] right to have that fear [01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:05.000] so while I'm not wild about judicial [01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:07.000] conduct and fortunately [01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:09.000] they're up for sunset this year so we get [01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:11.000] to go beat them up [01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:13.000] I don't like them they do [01:23:13.000 --> 01:23:15.000] work over the lower court judges [01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:19.000] so violent complaint against this guy [01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:21.000] that'll really get his attention [01:23:21.000 --> 01:23:23.000] and most likely he's [01:23:23.000 --> 01:23:25.000] a bar card carrying attorney [01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:27.000] because municipalities don't pay [01:23:27.000 --> 01:23:29.000] very much so he [01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:31.000] handles cases on the side [01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:33.000] when you bar you and you [01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:35.000] file a complaint under [01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:37.000] the [01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:39.000] American Bar Association model standards [01:23:39.000 --> 01:23:41.000] and you find that on barbrievers.net [01:23:41.000 --> 01:23:43.000] the top link [01:23:43.000 --> 01:23:45.000] will go to [01:23:45.000 --> 01:23:47.000] the standards [01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:49.000] for the prosecutorial function [01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:51.000] in question error format [01:23:51.000 --> 01:23:53.000] I've got that one all set up and working right [01:23:53.000 --> 01:23:55.000] you'll like that one [01:23:55.000 --> 01:23:57.000] you will be [01:23:57.000 --> 01:23:59.000] surprised at what you can grieve [01:23:59.000 --> 01:24:01.000] the lawyer for [01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:03.000] and for prosecutors [01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:05.000] that gets great fun [01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:07.000] Is there something that I could [01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:09.000] be? [01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:11.000] Oh, I [01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:13.000] don't see why not he's [01:24:13.000 --> 01:24:15.000] a municipal judge [01:24:15.000 --> 01:24:17.000] he's a public official [01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:19.000] so he's beholden to you [01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:21.000] I would say you'd have standing [01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:23.000] but we don't care [01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:25.000] they're not going to do anything [01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:27.000] and it's going to affect [01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:29.000] their bond rating whether they do anything or not [01:24:29.000 --> 01:24:31.000] whether [01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:33.000] you have standing to file or not [01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:35.000] it's not going to make any difference to these insurance companies [01:24:39.000 --> 01:24:41.000] Okay, this is a JP judge [01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:43.000] but they're still a municipal judge [01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:45.000] yeah [01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:47.000] municipal and JP actually fall [01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:49.000] under the same regulations [01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:51.000] all of the regulations for a justice of the peace [01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:53.000] applied in municipal [01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:55.000] JP judge is elected [01:24:55.000 --> 01:24:57.000] so they're somewhat different [01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:01.000] generally [01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:03.000] JP's are not lawyers [01:25:05.000 --> 01:25:07.000] so they won't necessarily [01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:09.000] have a bar card [01:25:09.000 --> 01:25:11.000] but almost all of the municipal judges [01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:13.000] and municipal prosecutors [01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:15.000] they have a practice [01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:17.000] on the side [01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:19.000] and a bar grievance [01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:21.000] will really hurt them [01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:23.000] or just a condo complaint [01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:25.000] the judicial condo complaint [01:25:25.000 --> 01:25:27.000] will raise the judge's bond rating [01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:29.000] if a municipality [01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:31.000] has half a dozen judges [01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:33.000] and one of them [01:25:33.000 --> 01:25:35.000] gets hammered several times [01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:37.000] the bond rating for the whole city goes up [01:25:37.000 --> 01:25:39.000] so [01:25:39.000 --> 01:25:41.000] they tend to get real excited [01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:43.000] about that kind of thing [01:25:43.000 --> 01:25:45.000] can't [01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:47.000] get justice through [01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:49.000] a fair and equitable court [01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:51.000] so we have to find another way to get it [01:25:53.000 --> 01:25:55.000] the other way to get it [01:25:55.000 --> 01:25:57.000] is through politics [01:25:57.000 --> 01:25:59.000] we invoke a little politics [01:25:59.000 --> 01:26:01.000] we get the mayor [01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:03.000] crawling down this judge's throat [01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:05.000] wanting to know what the heck [01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:07.000] is going on [01:26:07.000 --> 01:26:09.000] why are you drawing these judicial condo complaints [01:26:09.000 --> 01:26:11.000] and raising our bond rating [01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:13.000] it makes him a liability [01:26:13.000 --> 01:26:15.000] you sick somebody else on [01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:17.000] that creates the [01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:19.000] political pressures that you need [01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:25.000] okay do you have anything else for us [01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:27.000] yes yes okay [01:26:27.000 --> 01:26:29.000] after all this happened [01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:31.000] he got two letters in the mail [01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:33.000] two days later [01:26:33.000 --> 01:26:35.000] and I made a copy of it [01:26:35.000 --> 01:26:37.000] one of them addressing the seat belt [01:26:37.000 --> 01:26:39.000] ticket and the other one the speeding ticket [01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:43.000] has a dollar amount on it [01:26:43.000 --> 01:26:45.000] a docket number [01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:47.000] please consider this [01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:49.000] a courtesy reminder notice that you have [01:26:49.000 --> 01:26:51.000] been ordered to appear before the justice [01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:53.000] of the peace precinct one located [01:26:53.000 --> 01:26:55.000] and so on and so forth [01:26:55.000 --> 01:26:57.000] on February 22nd [01:26:57.000 --> 01:26:59.000] which is the way after the [01:26:59.000 --> 01:27:01.000] date on this citation [01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:03.000] additional charges to the offense referenced above [01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:05.000] failure to appear or [01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:07.000] respond as outlined in the citation [01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:09.000] we received from the officer [01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:11.000] at the site [01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:13.000] may result in the issuance of warrants [01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:15.000] additional charges in increasing [01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:17.000] the amount of fines and costs [01:27:17.000 --> 01:27:19.000] and hold placed on driver's license [01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:21.000] and a hold placed on driver's license [01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:23.000] and or vehicle registration [01:27:23.000 --> 01:27:25.000] okay okay we know all that [01:27:25.000 --> 01:27:27.000] that's your standard summons [01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:29.000] so that's a summons to court [01:27:29.000 --> 01:27:31.000] that appears to be a summons [01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:33.000] for trial [01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:35.000] okay [01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:37.000] if you're going to have emotions in [01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:39.000] you have to have them in seven days prior [01:27:39.000 --> 01:27:41.000] okay [01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:43.000] and you might talk to Eddie [01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:45.000] he's got a whole bunch of emotions he files [01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:49.000] and but if you [01:27:49.000 --> 01:27:51.000] go to court [01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:53.000] and they're not prepared [01:27:53.000 --> 01:27:55.000] for trial [01:27:55.000 --> 01:27:57.000] then you build the municipality [01:27:57.000 --> 01:27:59.000] for your time [01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:01.000] this is something else people [01:28:01.000 --> 01:28:03.000] aren't doing [01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:05.000] it is a [01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:07.000] standard practice for prosecutors [01:28:07.000 --> 01:28:09.000] for someone who pleads not guilty [01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:11.000] to order them to come to court [01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:13.000] and then they don't have court [01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:15.000] I have a friend who just called me over that [01:28:15.000 --> 01:28:17.000] he's an over the road truck driver [01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:19.000] and it costs him [01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:21.000] two weeks a week before [01:28:21.000 --> 01:28:23.000] and a week after [01:28:23.000 --> 01:28:25.000] and [01:28:25.000 --> 01:28:27.000] that's six to three thousand dollars [01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:29.000] a week that he would make [01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:31.000] that he loses [01:28:31.000 --> 01:28:33.000] because they have him come down here [01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:35.000] and that's why they do it [01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:37.000] they want it easier for you to just make a deal [01:28:37.000 --> 01:28:39.000] and pay him a bunch of money [01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:41.000] than trying to fight this thing [01:28:41.000 --> 01:28:43.000] because they're going to hammer you with this [01:28:43.000 --> 01:28:45.000] well in the American Bar Association standards [01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:47.000] for the prosecutorial function [01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:49.000] that is addressed [01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:51.000] and it is considered [01:28:51.000 --> 01:28:53.000] unethical conduct [01:28:53.000 --> 01:28:55.000] and [01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:57.000] prosecutors do get excited [01:28:57.000 --> 01:28:59.000] because if they ever get out [01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:01.000] of the prosecutor's office [01:29:01.000 --> 01:29:03.000] then they're going to have to practice [01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:05.000] out here with everybody else [01:29:05.000 --> 01:29:07.000] and they're going to have to have malpractice insurance [01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:09.000] and the malpractice insurance [01:29:09.000 --> 01:29:11.000] if they've got grievances [01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:13.000] it's going to cost them big time [01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:17.000] so I suggest [01:29:17.000 --> 01:29:19.000] go to bargreevens.net [01:29:19.000 --> 01:29:21.000] and the top link [01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:23.000] on the left will be [01:29:23.000 --> 01:29:25.000] to the American Bar Association standards [01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:27.000] for the prosecutorial function [01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:29.000] click on that [01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:31.000] and go through the questions [01:29:31.000 --> 01:29:33.000] I think you'll find it very interesting [01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:35.000] and you'll find lots of things [01:29:35.000 --> 01:29:37.000] you can hammer them for [01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:39.000] we do need to move along [01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:41.000] we've got more callers [01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:43.000] thank you Jeremy [01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:45.000] this is Randy Kelton, David Stevens [01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:47.000] David Craig, Will LaRidio Francis [01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:49.000] we'll pick you up next [01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:51.000] David, I see you there [01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:53.000] we'll get you as soon as we're done with Francis [01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:57.000] call it number 512-646-1984 [01:29:57.000 --> 01:29:59.000] we'll be right back [01:29:59.000 --> 01:30:01.000] a noble lie [01:30:01.000 --> 01:30:03.000] Oklahoma City, 1995 [01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:05.000] will change forever the way you look at the true [01:30:05.000 --> 01:30:07.000] nature of terrorism [01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:09.000] based on the damage patting to the building [01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:11.000] but the government sends impossible [01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:13.000] the grand jury did not want to hear [01:30:13.000 --> 01:30:15.000] anything I had to say [01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:17.000] the decision was made not to pursue [01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:19.000] some of these columns were [01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:21.000] ripped up, shredded [01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:23.000] tossed around [01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:25.000] the people that did the things they did [01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:27.000] knew doggone well what they were doing [01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:29.000] expose the cover up now at [01:30:29.000 --> 01:30:31.000] thenoblelie.com [01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:33.000] the rule of law radio network [01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:35.000] is proud to present a due process of law seminar [01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:37.000] hosted by our own Eddie Craig [01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:39.000] Eddie is a former Nakadocha [01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:41.000] sheriff's deputy and for the past 21 years [01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:43.000] he's been studying the due process of law [01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:45.000] and now offers his knowledge to you at a seminar [01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:47.000] on Sunday from 2 o'clock to 5 o'clock [01:30:47.000 --> 01:30:49.000] at brave new books located at [01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:51.000] 1904 Guadalupe street [01:30:51.000 --> 01:30:53.000] admission is $20 so please make plans [01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:55.000] to come by and sit with Eddie and learn [01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:57.000] for yourself what the true intent of law [01:30:57.000 --> 01:30:59.000] really is [01:30:59.000 --> 01:31:01.000] at hempusa.org [01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:03.000] we offer chemical free products [01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:05.000] to people around the world [01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:07.000] detoxifying, self healing [01:31:07.000 --> 01:31:09.000] while rebuilding the immune system [01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:11.000] we urge our listeners to please consider [01:31:11.000 --> 01:31:13.000] our largest selling product [01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:15.000] micro plant powder [01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:17.000] our micro plant powder is rich [01:31:17.000 --> 01:31:19.000] in iodine, probiotics, zinc [01:31:19.000 --> 01:31:21.000] and silica to help rebuild the immune system [01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:23.000] and to create a healthy stomach [01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:25.000] flora micro plant powder is excellent [01:31:25.000 --> 01:31:27.000] for daily intake and is perfect [01:31:27.000 --> 01:31:29.000] to add to your storage shelter [01:31:29.000 --> 01:31:31.000] we urge our listeners to please visit us [01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:33.000] at hempusa.org [01:31:33.000 --> 01:31:35.000] and remember all of our products are chemical free [01:31:35.000 --> 01:31:37.000] and healthy to eat [01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:39.000] we constantly strive to give you the best service [01:31:39.000 --> 01:31:41.000] highest quality and rapid shipping [01:31:41.000 --> 01:31:43.000] anywhere and we offer free shipping [01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:45.000] on orders over $95 in the US [01:31:45.000 --> 01:31:47.000] please visit us at hempusa.org [01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:51.000] or call 908-691-2608 [01:31:51.000 --> 01:31:53.000] that's 908-691-2608 [01:31:53.000 --> 01:31:55.000] see what our powder [01:31:55.000 --> 01:31:57.000] seeds and oil can do for you [01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:13.000] at hempusa.org [01:32:27.000 --> 01:32:41.000] at hempusa.org [01:32:41.000 --> 01:32:43.000] okay we are back [01:32:43.000 --> 01:32:45.000] Randy Kelton, Deb. Steve and Teddy Craig [01:32:45.000 --> 01:32:49.000] and we're talking to Francis [01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:51.000] in Colorado [01:32:51.000 --> 01:32:53.000] hello miss Francis [01:32:53.000 --> 01:32:55.000] hey Randy, how are you tonight [01:32:55.000 --> 01:32:57.000] I am wonderful [01:32:57.000 --> 01:32:59.000] I don't care what everybody says [01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:03.000] so what do you have for us tonight [01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:05.000] due process I think [01:33:05.000 --> 01:33:07.000] I am in [01:33:07.000 --> 01:33:09.000] we've had two separate hearings [01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:11.000] our two separate cases [01:33:11.000 --> 01:33:13.000] heard in the district court [01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:15.000] and both of them had two hearings each [01:33:15.000 --> 01:33:17.000] and we're finding out yesterday [01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:19.000] we peeled both of them [01:33:19.000 --> 01:33:21.000] and so we're on the second [01:33:21.000 --> 01:33:23.000] we're on the appeal [01:33:23.000 --> 01:33:25.000] and I found out that only one [01:33:25.000 --> 01:33:27.000] of the court hearings [01:33:27.000 --> 01:33:29.000] has a recorder [01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:31.000] that is associated with it [01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:33.000] so we only have one transcript [01:33:33.000 --> 01:33:35.000] and the transcript that's missing [01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:37.000] is the one with all the info in it [01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:39.000] where I just was like kept talking [01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:41.000] and putting everything on the record [01:33:41.000 --> 01:33:43.000] so [01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:45.000] was there a county [01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:47.000] was there a court reporter [01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:49.000] present [01:33:49.000 --> 01:33:51.000] you know I don't know [01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:53.000] they were the clerk over to one side [01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:57.000] and [01:33:57.000 --> 01:33:59.000] the second time around there was [01:33:59.000 --> 01:34:01.000] when we went back the second week but [01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:03.000] okay if there's no [01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:05.000] court reporter there was no hearing [01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:09.000] they moved to [01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:11.000] void any judgment made [01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:13.000] in the hearing [01:34:13.000 --> 01:34:15.000] and request to re-hearing [01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:19.000] okay so what happens with my appeal [01:34:19.000 --> 01:34:21.000] well your appeal [01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:23.000] would become moot [01:34:25.000 --> 01:34:27.000] it'll only become moot [01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:29.000] if they void the judgment [01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:33.000] so move to void the judgment [01:34:33.000 --> 01:34:35.000] and have a new hearing [01:34:35.000 --> 01:34:37.000] yeah and we're scheduling [01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:39.000] hearing with a court reporter [01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:43.000] you can't appeal if you don't have [01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:45.000] transcript [01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:47.000] that's true [01:34:47.000 --> 01:34:49.000] they denied you your right to appeal [01:34:51.000 --> 01:34:53.000] petition to void judgment [01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:55.000] and re-hearing [01:34:55.000 --> 01:34:57.000] alright [01:34:57.000 --> 01:34:59.000] and then [01:35:01.000 --> 01:35:03.000] now my other thing is [01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:05.000] in some of these cases that you and I have been working on [01:35:05.000 --> 01:35:07.000] they're not answering to the fees [01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:09.000] just like you tell me so they go and they answer [01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:11.000] everything else so do I file [01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:13.000] a motion for a no answer default just on that [01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:17.000] yes partial default [01:35:19.000 --> 01:35:21.000] okay motion for a partial default [01:35:25.000 --> 01:35:27.000] alright [01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:29.000] and [01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:31.000] well that'll keep me busy over the weekend [01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:35.000] that should be fun [01:35:35.000 --> 01:35:37.000] and you might judicial conduct complaint to judge [01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:39.000] for holding a hearing without a court [01:35:39.000 --> 01:35:41.000] reporter [01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:43.000] you know Randy that was [01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:45.000] when I was telling him that [01:35:45.000 --> 01:35:47.000] the other hearing with the other judge [01:35:47.000 --> 01:35:49.000] when he said well this has already been decided [01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:51.000] and there was a hearing [01:35:51.000 --> 01:35:53.000] the other judge had a hearing and he had evidence [01:35:53.000 --> 01:35:55.000] and I said no no your honor [01:35:55.000 --> 01:35:57.000] there was no hearing there was no court reporter [01:35:57.000 --> 01:35:59.000] there was no [01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:01.000] evidence entered and there were no appearances [01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:03.000] entered and [01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:05.000] there was no hearing [01:36:05.000 --> 01:36:07.000] and that's the [01:36:07.000 --> 01:36:09.000] transcript that disappeared or that's the [01:36:09.000 --> 01:36:11.000] recording that's not there [01:36:11.000 --> 01:36:13.000] wonderful [01:36:13.000 --> 01:36:15.000] that's enough just [01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:17.000] smell a rat but I think I do [01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:23.000] bring it to their attention don't let them get away [01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:25.000] with this [01:36:25.000 --> 01:36:27.000] okay well they were going to sign [01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:29.000] an affidavit according to the transcriber [01:36:29.000 --> 01:36:31.000] yesterday when she called [01:36:31.000 --> 01:36:33.000] and let me know because I was already after her [01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:35.000] for not I asked you on Wednesday [01:36:35.000 --> 01:36:37.000] she was already after [01:36:37.000 --> 01:36:39.000] going to file a motion against her [01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:41.000] for not filing the getting transcripts [01:36:41.000 --> 01:36:43.000] done on time and she called me [01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:45.000] early in the morning and said [01:36:45.000 --> 01:36:47.000] there we can't they can't find [01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:49.000] the transcripts they can't find any [01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:51.000] recording for the fourth and [01:36:51.000 --> 01:36:53.000] the court's going to issue an affidavit [01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:57.000] that they don't have any to [01:36:57.000 --> 01:36:59.000] anyway they're going to issue an affidavit [01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:01.000] to the appeals court that they don't [01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:03.000] have a recording so I didn't know [01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:05.000] if I would issue [01:37:07.000 --> 01:37:09.000] this goes to avoid judgment [01:37:09.000 --> 01:37:11.000] you have no way to appeal [01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:13.000] because there's nothing to appeal [01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:15.000] there's no record for the court [01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:17.000] of appeals to look at so [01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:19.000] move to avoid judgment and re-hear [01:37:19.000 --> 01:37:21.000] okay well because [01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:23.000] the hearing the transcript [01:37:23.000 --> 01:37:25.000] that they do have was the one where they said [01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:27.000] they ruled in favor [01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:29.000] of the plaintiff Fannie Mae [01:37:29.000 --> 01:37:31.000] that's the part that [01:37:31.000 --> 01:37:33.000] we were appealing that particular judgment [01:37:33.000 --> 01:37:35.000] so they made the judgment I just don't have any [01:37:35.000 --> 01:37:37.000] of the information off the first one [01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:39.000] well that's what I mean you can't appeal [01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:41.000] if you don't have anything to appeal with [01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:43.000] if you don't have a transcript you don't have [01:37:43.000 --> 01:37:45.000] anything to appeal from [01:37:45.000 --> 01:37:47.000] okay [01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:49.000] nothing happened [01:37:49.000 --> 01:37:51.000] so they can come in there [01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:53.000] and do all kind of criminal [01:37:53.000 --> 01:37:55.000] improper stuff you can't appeal it [01:37:55.000 --> 01:37:57.000] because you can't show that it occurred [01:37:57.000 --> 01:37:59.000] what actually occurred [01:37:59.000 --> 01:38:01.000] so that's denying [01:38:01.000 --> 01:38:03.000] your right to appeal [01:38:03.000 --> 01:38:05.000] so move for avoid judgment [01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:07.000] okay well I didn't do that [01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:09.000] back in 2010 and 2011 [01:38:09.000 --> 01:38:11.000] when the first time it happened [01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:13.000] am I barred from that [01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:15.000] you filed the appeal [01:38:15.000 --> 01:38:17.000] of course not this is a different hearing [01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:19.000] okay but can I go back [01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:21.000] at that point because that's what started it all [01:38:23.000 --> 01:38:25.000] okay now wait a minute I have no idea [01:38:25.000 --> 01:38:27.000] what you're talking about now [01:38:27.000 --> 01:38:29.000] you have all of the facts in place [01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:33.000] what hearing when [01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:35.000] how did it relate [01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:37.000] okay so in 2010 [01:38:37.000 --> 01:38:39.000] there was a hearing [01:38:39.000 --> 01:38:41.000] in October of 2010 [01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:43.000] the bank failed to show [01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:45.000] I asked the judge [01:38:45.000 --> 01:38:47.000] why he wasn't ruling in our favor [01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:49.000] and he just [01:38:49.000 --> 01:38:51.000] you know kind of blue smoke up my skirt [01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:53.000] and I filed a judicial complaint [01:38:53.000 --> 01:38:55.000] and then when the hearing was [01:38:55.000 --> 01:38:57.000] reset [01:38:57.000 --> 01:38:59.000] there was no court reporter there were no [01:38:59.000 --> 01:39:01.000] appearances entered [01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:03.000] there was nothing we appealed [01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:05.000] and when we appealed and went for the transcript [01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:07.000] in the second one there was no transcript [01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:09.000] that's when we found out about that [01:39:09.000 --> 01:39:11.000] and then it all just kind of fell apart [01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:13.000] and by that time we were in federal court [01:39:13.000 --> 01:39:15.000] so my question is [01:39:15.000 --> 01:39:17.000] is it too late to go back [01:39:17.000 --> 01:39:19.000] after that first one [01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:21.000] I don't [01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:23.000] you haven't told me what it was [01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:25.000] I don't know what the ruling was [01:39:25.000 --> 01:39:27.000] what the hearing was about [01:39:27.000 --> 01:39:29.000] you just told me there was a hearing [01:39:29.000 --> 01:39:31.000] I have no idea what it was about so I don't know [01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:33.000] if it matters [01:39:33.000 --> 01:39:35.000] foreclosure [01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:39.000] the first foreclosure has [01:39:39.000 --> 01:39:41.000] is the first foreclosure still in place [01:39:43.000 --> 01:39:45.000] yes [01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:47.000] oh [01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:49.000] this is a question of time [01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:51.000] I don't know [01:39:51.000 --> 01:39:53.000] if you go to colorado law [01:39:53.000 --> 01:39:55.000] on how much time you have [01:39:55.000 --> 01:39:57.000] to challenge [01:39:57.000 --> 01:39:59.000] a ruling and I don't think [01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:01.000] you're going to be able to do that [01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:03.000] I think the judge will lose [01:40:03.000 --> 01:40:05.000] plenary jurisdiction generally [01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:07.000] after 30 days [01:40:07.000 --> 01:40:09.000] from the time he signs an order [01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:13.000] so probably you're not going to be able to go back [01:40:13.000 --> 01:40:15.000] on that but you can certainly try it [01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:17.000] all they can do is [01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:19.000] argue against it and then you can sue [01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:21.000] maybe [01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:23.000] well we're going through the wrongful foreclosure [01:40:23.000 --> 01:40:25.000] in the other case that you helped me write [01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:27.000] so that you wrote basically [01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:29.000] yeah [01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:31.000] pick your fights which do you need to get done [01:40:31.000 --> 01:40:33.000] right now [01:40:33.000 --> 01:40:35.000] I still don't understand [01:40:35.000 --> 01:40:37.000] you're going through [01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:39.000] it was foreclosed on back then [01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:41.000] was that foreclosure overturned [01:40:41.000 --> 01:40:43.000] no it never was [01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:45.000] no was it a different property [01:40:45.000 --> 01:40:47.000] no it's the same property [01:40:47.000 --> 01:40:49.000] this doesn't make sense [01:40:49.000 --> 01:40:51.000] they're foreclosing twice on the same property [01:40:51.000 --> 01:40:53.000] no they didn't [01:40:53.000 --> 01:40:55.000] no no they foreclosed [01:40:55.000 --> 01:40:57.000] you're not making sense [01:40:57.000 --> 01:40:59.000] they foreclosed [01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:01.000] the foreclosure is a feat of comp play [01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:03.000] it's already done two years ago [01:41:03.000 --> 01:41:05.000] right [01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:07.000] so what are they doing now [01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:09.000] well we were in the [01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:11.000] federal court and now we're [01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:13.000] back in the district [01:41:13.000 --> 01:41:15.000] don't tell me we were in the federal court [01:41:15.000 --> 01:41:17.000] we've been on [01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:19.000] what are you doing in the federal court [01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:21.000] what is the [01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:23.000] how does it relate to the foreclosure [01:41:23.000 --> 01:41:25.000] I don't know what's going on here [01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:27.000] okay sorry [01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:29.000] we filed the respite [01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:31.000] until a case into the federal court [01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:33.000] after the foreclosure [01:41:33.000 --> 01:41:35.000] and that was dismissed [01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:37.000] about 15 months later [01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:39.000] and then [01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:41.000] two months after that one was dismissed [01:41:41.000 --> 01:41:43.000] we filed wrongful foreclosure [01:41:43.000 --> 01:41:45.000] back in the district court [01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:47.000] at the same time that [01:41:47.000 --> 01:41:49.000] they filed [01:41:49.000 --> 01:41:51.000] did you raise this issue [01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:53.000] of the improper [01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:55.000] hearing in the wrongful foreclosure [01:41:57.000 --> 01:41:59.000] yes [01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:01.000] okay then it's already before [01:42:01.000 --> 01:42:03.000] the court [01:42:03.000 --> 01:42:05.000] okay [01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:07.000] okay so you don't have to [01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:09.000] readdress it okay sorry I was getting frustrated [01:42:09.000 --> 01:42:11.000] there's too many details [01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:13.000] I'm old I get confused easy [01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:15.000] no that's okay [01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:17.000] I'm pretty frustrated [01:42:17.000 --> 01:42:19.000] because they don't have these court [01:42:19.000 --> 01:42:21.000] reporters when they should [01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:23.000] I like that kind of stuff because [01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:25.000] it gives you a secondary way to go after them [01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:29.000] you get to do a collateral [01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:31.000] attack and that screws everything [01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:33.000] up for them if there was [01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:35.000] a court reporter present then you go after [01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:37.000] the court reporter and just sue the court [01:42:37.000 --> 01:42:39.000] reporter [01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:41.000] everything you lose in this case [01:42:41.000 --> 01:42:43.000] just [01:42:43.000 --> 01:42:45.000] how would I find [01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:47.000] that out I just ask [01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:49.000] if there was a court reporter [01:42:49.000 --> 01:42:51.000] okay yeah check with the court and see [01:42:51.000 --> 01:42:53.000] if there's a court reporter present that day [01:42:53.000 --> 01:42:55.000] they'll be in the record somewhere [01:42:55.000 --> 01:42:57.000] okay [01:42:57.000 --> 01:42:59.000] okay [01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:01.000] the clerk can tell you how to [01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:03.000] find out what court reporter [01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:05.000] was assigned to that court [01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:07.000] okay we have to move quickly [01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:09.000] I'm running out of time [01:43:09.000 --> 01:43:11.000] alright thank you [01:43:11.000 --> 01:43:13.000] thank you Francis [01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:15.000] okay we are about to go [01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:17.000] to break [01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:19.000] we're going to go to David [01:43:19.000 --> 01:43:21.000] in Texas [01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:23.000] David you got about 20 seconds [01:43:23.000 --> 01:43:25.000] well I'll start with [01:43:25.000 --> 01:43:27.000] the first one I'll have more [01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:29.000] than that but the gentleman [01:43:29.000 --> 01:43:31.000] with the 200 [01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:33.000] oh wait a minute this is David in [01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:35.000] you're going to take two hours [01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:37.000] hold on I'll pick you up [01:43:37.000 --> 01:43:39.000] on the other side [01:43:39.000 --> 01:43:41.000] you can't do anything in 20 seconds [01:43:41.000 --> 01:43:43.000] okay [01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:45.000] Randy Kelton, David Stevens [01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:47.000] Eddie Craig, Rubleau Radio [01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:49.000] we're going into our last [01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:51.000] segment we got a couple of callers [01:43:51.000 --> 01:43:53.000] we got three callers [01:43:53.000 --> 01:43:55.000] so we'll try to go kind of quickly when we come back [01:43:55.000 --> 01:44:05.000] but we'll be right back on the other side [01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:27.000] go check it out for yourself [01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:29.000] it's downtown at 1904 [01:44:29.000 --> 01:44:31.000] Guadalupe street just south of UT [01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:33.000] oh by UT [01:44:33.000 --> 01:44:35.000] there's never anywhere to park down there [01:44:35.000 --> 01:44:37.000] actually they now offer a free [01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:39.000] hour of parking for paying customers [01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:41.000] at the 500 MLK parking facility [01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:43.000] just behind the bookstore [01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:45.000] it does exist [01:44:45.000 --> 01:44:55.000] Monday through Saturday 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays so give them a call at 512-480-2503 [01:44:55.000 --> 01:45:23.000] or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:25.000] you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:25.000 --> 01:45:27.000] about the principles and practices [01:45:27.000 --> 01:45:29.000] that control our American courts [01:45:29.000 --> 01:45:31.000] you'll receive our audio classroom [01:45:31.000 --> 01:45:33.000] video seminar [01:45:33.000 --> 01:45:35.000] tutorials [01:45:35.000 --> 01:45:37.000] forms for civil cases [01:45:37.000 --> 01:45:39.000] pro se tactics [01:45:39.000 --> 01:45:41.000] and much more [01:45:41.000 --> 01:45:43.000] please visit Lucia's [01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:45.000] YouTube channel [01:45:45.000 --> 01:45:47.000] you can learn what everyone should understand [01:45:47.000 --> 01:45:49.000] about the principles and practices [01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:51.000] that control our American courts [01:45:51.000 --> 01:45:53.000] and much more [01:45:53.000 --> 01:45:55.000] please visit www.lulavlawradio.com [01:45:55.000 --> 01:45:57.000] and click on the banner [01:45:57.000 --> 01:46:23.000] free 866-LAW-E-Z [01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:29.000] okay we are back [01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:31.000] Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig [01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:33.000] Luvlar Radio and we're talking to [01:46:33.000 --> 01:46:35.000] talking to David in Texas [01:46:35.000 --> 01:46:37.000] okay David I picked on you going out [01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:39.000] now it's your turn I guess [01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:41.000] to pick on me [01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:43.000] you Randy I might [01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:45.000] kid you a little bit but anyway [01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:47.000] the gentleman with the $200 [01:46:47.000 --> 01:46:49.000] hot check [01:46:49.000 --> 01:46:51.000] first [01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:53.000] has he [01:46:53.000 --> 01:46:55.000] called the bank to verify [01:46:55.000 --> 01:46:57.000] that it won't cash [01:46:57.000 --> 01:46:59.000] every day [01:46:59.000 --> 01:47:01.000] that's what he can [01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:03.000] call like early in the morning [01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:05.000] and see if there's been any deposits made [01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:07.000] possibly [01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:09.000] they'll make a deposit and it'll clear it [01:47:09.000 --> 01:47:11.000] and he can just walk it in and get his money [01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:13.000] the other thing he can do if he can get [01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:15.000] one of the tellers to tell him [01:47:15.000 --> 01:47:17.000] the balance on that other gentleman [01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:19.000] to count up and say [01:47:19.000 --> 01:47:21.000] he's got a $200 check [01:47:21.000 --> 01:47:23.000] he can make a $26 cash deposit [01:47:23.000 --> 01:47:25.000] and immediately [01:47:25.000 --> 01:47:27.000] present the check after the deposit [01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:29.000] they will clear his check [01:47:29.000 --> 01:47:31.000] he'll only have $174 [01:47:31.000 --> 01:47:33.000] but that's better than zero [01:47:33.000 --> 01:47:35.000] but [01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:37.000] he was talking to you [01:47:37.000 --> 01:47:39.000] about what he's going to do legally [01:47:39.000 --> 01:47:41.000] well he has to do what's called [01:47:41.000 --> 01:47:43.000] it's not called a tort letter [01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:45.000] but it's the same as it's a 10 day [01:47:45.000 --> 01:47:47.000] letter to notice it [01:47:47.000 --> 01:47:49.000] madam sir [01:47:49.000 --> 01:47:51.000] your check [01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:53.000] number dated from [01:47:53.000 --> 01:47:55.000] certain bank in the amount of [01:47:55.000 --> 01:47:57.000] was returned mark [01:47:57.000 --> 01:47:59.000] however it was marked [01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:01.000] please be aware [01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:03.000] 10 days [01:48:03.000 --> 01:48:05.000] from the day of this letter [01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:07.000] we will file [01:48:07.000 --> 01:48:09.000] with the district attorney [01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:13.000] charges against you [01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:15.000] if this check [01:48:15.000 --> 01:48:17.000] is not faded before that date [01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:19.000] and then you send it to [01:48:19.000 --> 01:48:21.000] Rizal [01:48:21.000 --> 01:48:23.000] and copy [01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:25.000] and certify that one [01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:27.000] and first class mail the second one [01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:29.000] he has to have 10 days [01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:31.000] also [01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:33.000] he took the check [01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:35.000] he should have gotten a TDL [01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:37.000] Texas drivers license number [01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:39.000] on the check [01:48:39.000 --> 01:48:41.000] or the DA won't take it unless [01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:43.000] someone else is filed [01:48:43.000 --> 01:48:45.000] the person and has positive [01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:47.000] identification [01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:49.000] are you there [01:48:49.000 --> 01:48:51.000] yeah I'm here that's interesting [01:48:51.000 --> 01:48:53.000] the document [01:48:53.000 --> 01:48:55.000] the tort letter [01:48:55.000 --> 01:48:57.000] can you get a blank of that [01:48:57.000 --> 01:48:59.000] from the prosecutor [01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:01.000] no but if you can call [01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:03.000] any county attorney [01:49:03.000 --> 01:49:05.000] in any county in the great state [01:49:05.000 --> 01:49:07.000] of Texas and they [01:49:07.000 --> 01:49:09.000] have written [01:49:09.000 --> 01:49:11.000] what I'm telling you they have it all [01:49:11.000 --> 01:49:13.000] written out [01:49:13.000 --> 01:49:15.000] and once you go through it 25 or 30 times [01:49:15.000 --> 01:49:17.000] you learn [01:49:19.000 --> 01:49:21.000] I hope I don't have to go through it [01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:23.000] that many times [01:49:23.000 --> 01:49:25.000] but that is good information [01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:27.000] I'm no longer in business [01:49:27.000 --> 01:49:29.000] but when I was in business [01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:31.000] my competitors [01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:33.000] would not take personal checks [01:49:33.000 --> 01:49:35.000] but I would advertise that I would take [01:49:35.000 --> 01:49:37.000] personal checks [01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:39.000] but I also prosecuted lots of people [01:49:39.000 --> 01:49:41.000] I had maybe $12,000 [01:49:41.000 --> 01:49:43.000] to $15,000 [01:49:43.000 --> 01:49:45.000] checks that the county attorney [01:49:45.000 --> 01:49:47.000] was supposed to be collecting [01:49:47.000 --> 01:49:49.000] for me [01:49:49.000 --> 01:49:51.000] at certain times [01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:53.000] so did he do a good job [01:49:53.000 --> 01:49:55.000] of collecting [01:49:55.000 --> 01:49:57.000] you know for a while Randy [01:49:57.000 --> 01:49:59.000] I got a check from the county [01:49:59.000 --> 01:50:01.000] and all the district attorney [01:50:01.000 --> 01:50:03.000] if it becomes a felony [01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:05.000] the district attorney collects it [01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:07.000] and then when they prosecute people [01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:09.000] from in jail [01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:11.000] you start getting [01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:13.000] payments every month [01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:15.000] and some months I'd get [01:50:15.000 --> 01:50:17.000] $150,000 [01:50:17.000 --> 01:50:19.000] $225,000 [01:50:19.000 --> 01:50:21.000] $350,000 [01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:23.000] from [01:50:23.000 --> 01:50:25.000] checks collected from the prosecutors [01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:27.000] and then it started [01:50:27.000 --> 01:50:29.000] falling off where it was [01:50:29.000 --> 01:50:31.000] every three months I'd get a check [01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:33.000] and finally [01:50:33.000 --> 01:50:35.000] they just weren't collecting at all [01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:37.000] not their most [01:50:37.000 --> 01:50:39.000] I don't know what happened [01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:41.000] but anyway they quit collecting [01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:43.000] so I went to the county judge [01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:45.000] and I said your honor you know [01:50:45.000 --> 01:50:47.000] your prosecutors [01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:49.000] aren't doing their job [01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:51.000] because they've got [01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:53.000] more than $10,000 worth of [01:50:53.000 --> 01:50:55.000] checks that I filed on and they're not [01:50:55.000 --> 01:50:57.000] collecting them because they're not sending me [01:50:57.000 --> 01:50:59.000] any monies if they are collecting them [01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:01.000] somebody's keeping the money [01:51:01.000 --> 01:51:03.000] and I said I'd like to request to have [01:51:03.000 --> 01:51:05.000] all my items [01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:07.000] sent back to me with no charge to me [01:51:07.000 --> 01:51:09.000] that way I can go to civil court [01:51:09.000 --> 01:51:11.000] and file on these people civilly [01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:13.000] as criminal with the DA [01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:15.000] and the county attorney [01:51:15.000 --> 01:51:17.000] but it's civil I can go to [01:51:17.000 --> 01:51:19.000] civil court and file [01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:21.000] a tort you know they've taken [01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:23.000] advantage of me as a merchant [01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:27.000] and is that what the judge do [01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:29.000] they send me my checks back [01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:31.000] yes sir [01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:33.000] yes sir [01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:35.000] they send them back [01:51:35.000 --> 01:51:37.000] these must [01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:39.000] have been people they couldn't [01:51:39.000 --> 01:51:41.000] contact easily [01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:43.000] well I don't know what the [01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:45.000] thing was I guess they just decided [01:51:45.000 --> 01:51:47.000] they didn't want to collect for [01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:49.000] my checks anymore [01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:51.000] but tell the gentleman if he's listening [01:51:51.000 --> 01:51:53.000] he needs to write a letter [01:51:55.000 --> 01:51:57.000] you know he can re-listen to [01:51:57.000 --> 01:51:59.000] the re-broadcast on Sunday [01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:01.000] morning if he needs the words [01:52:01.000 --> 01:52:03.000] and basically it just tells him [01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:07.000] 10 days from the day to this letter [01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:09.000] I'm going to file charges on you [01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:11.000] and on the 11th day no later than the 12th [01:52:11.000 --> 01:52:13.000] he needs to go in person [01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:15.000] to the county attorney [01:52:15.000 --> 01:52:17.000] and fill out the form and swear to it [01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:19.000] and he'll have to take the check [01:52:19.000 --> 01:52:21.000] with the Texas driver's license [01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:23.000] written on it [01:52:23.000 --> 01:52:25.000] in his hand and they're going to ask him [01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:27.000] did you, can you identify [01:52:27.000 --> 01:52:29.000] this person did you see him [01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:31.000] with your eyeballs and did he give you [01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:33.000] this check because [01:52:33.000 --> 01:52:35.000] you know all kinds of bad things [01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:37.000] could start happening once you file on [01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:39.000] and you have to swear yes [01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:41.000] he did it and I took it [01:52:41.000 --> 01:52:43.000] and get him [01:52:43.000 --> 01:52:45.000] anyway [01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:47.000] okay that is [01:52:47.000 --> 01:52:49.000] that is great thanks [01:52:49.000 --> 01:52:51.000] I do need to move along I've got one more [01:52:51.000 --> 01:52:53.000] caller that was really great information [01:52:53.000 --> 01:52:55.000] thank you David [01:52:55.000 --> 01:52:57.000] another thing Randy [01:52:57.000 --> 01:52:59.000] the gentleman who had the 16 year old [01:52:59.000 --> 01:53:01.000] who was about to turn 17 [01:53:01.000 --> 01:53:03.000] and had a problem at home with the young ladies [01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:07.000] if the state or his family [01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:09.000] could figure out how to get him [01:53:09.000 --> 01:53:11.000] to join the military [01:53:11.000 --> 01:53:13.000] he could chase [01:53:13.000 --> 01:53:15.000] all kinds of young women [01:53:15.000 --> 01:53:17.000] living somewhere else [01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:19.000] and they would [01:53:19.000 --> 01:53:21.000] they would teach him [01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:23.000] straight and out of way real quick [01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:25.000] and no one else [01:53:25.000 --> 01:53:27.000] the state nor his family [01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:29.000] would have to take care of him [01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:31.000] if [01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:33.000] he's 17 he can go before court [01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:35.000] petition the court [01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:37.000] for removal of his disabilities [01:53:37.000 --> 01:53:39.000] of minority [01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:41.000] and they remove his minorities [01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:43.000] of age [01:53:43.000 --> 01:53:45.000] and as if [01:53:45.000 --> 01:53:47.000] he were 18 or 21 whatever [01:53:47.000 --> 01:53:49.000] the military requires [01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:51.000] can remain that minority [01:53:51.000 --> 01:53:53.000] and they can draft him or he can join the military [01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:55.000] well that is interesting [01:53:55.000 --> 01:53:57.000] I didn't know you could do that [01:53:57.000 --> 01:53:59.000] well I was 17 [01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:01.000] and I went before court [01:54:01.000 --> 01:54:03.000] I was 17 [01:54:03.000 --> 01:54:05.000] and married and had a wife [01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:07.000] and a child on the way [01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:09.000] and I asked the judge to remove my minority [01:54:09.000 --> 01:54:11.000] of disability [01:54:11.000 --> 01:54:13.000] minority and he did [01:54:13.000 --> 01:54:15.000] and then I was licensed as a [01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:17.000] Texas real estate sales person [01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:19.000] and I was only 17 [01:54:19.000 --> 01:54:21.000] I was the youngest wife [01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:23.000] in the state at that time [01:54:23.000 --> 01:54:25.000] interesting [01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:27.000] well you [01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:29.000] I've talked to you I've met you [01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:31.000] so you certainly got over that [01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:33.000] young thing pretty good [01:54:33.000 --> 01:54:35.000] haha [01:54:35.000 --> 01:54:37.000] yeah [01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:39.000] okay thank you David [01:54:39.000 --> 01:54:41.000] we've got one more call we want to try to get to [01:54:41.000 --> 01:54:43.000] we've got about three four minutes left [01:54:43.000 --> 01:54:45.000] thanks a lot David [01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:47.000] okay now we're going to go to [01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:49.000] John in Texas [01:54:49.000 --> 01:54:51.000] John I understand you have a [01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:53.000] foreclosure question [01:54:53.000 --> 01:54:55.000] yeah I'm set for foreclosure [01:54:55.000 --> 01:54:57.000] the 5th of February [01:54:57.000 --> 01:54:59.000] in the county records [01:54:59.000 --> 01:55:01.000] this is Tarrant County [01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:03.000] there's no assignments [01:55:03.000 --> 01:55:05.000] whatsoever [01:55:05.000 --> 01:55:07.000] I've got one [01:55:07.000 --> 01:55:09.000] notice this is Bank of America [01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:11.000] they sent me a notice on the [01:55:11.000 --> 01:55:13.000] like the 26th of October [01:55:13.000 --> 01:55:15.000] that [01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:17.000] resurgent mortgage servicing [01:55:17.000 --> 01:55:19.000] is going to be taken over [01:55:19.000 --> 01:55:21.000] their part [01:55:21.000 --> 01:55:23.000] all of a sudden [01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:25.000] they're not [01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:27.000] it's still Bank of America [01:55:27.000 --> 01:55:29.000] and there's a letter [01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:31.000] not an assignment of anything [01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:33.000] just a letter saying it's been assigned [01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:35.000] failed and transferred [01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:37.000] the servicing right [01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:39.000] anyway Bank of America does not have it [01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:41.000] and there's not [01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:43.000] anything since I got this [01:55:43.000 --> 01:55:45.000] it's a real finance [01:55:45.000 --> 01:55:47.000] okay who was the original lender [01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:51.000] it was originally countywide [01:55:53.000 --> 01:55:55.000] oh countrywide [01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:57.000] okay so that was actually [01:55:57.000 --> 01:55:59.000] Bank of America [01:55:59.000 --> 01:56:01.000] kinda so there's no assignment [01:56:01.000 --> 01:56:03.000] from [01:56:03.000 --> 01:56:05.000] countrywide to Bank of America [01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:07.000] no and there's no assignment [01:56:07.000 --> 01:56:09.000] to this [01:56:09.000 --> 01:56:11.000] resurgent [01:56:11.000 --> 01:56:13.000] mortgage company [01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:15.000] they said they transferred [01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:17.000] failed transfer but that's just in the [01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:19.000] letter they're telling me [01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:21.000] it's not an actual instrument [01:56:21.000 --> 01:56:23.000] nothing has been [01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:25.000] assigned in the county records [01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:27.000] since I refinanced [01:56:27.000 --> 01:56:29.000] that was in February 2005 [01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:31.000] okay [01:56:31.000 --> 01:56:33.000] we might want to talk about this off there [01:56:33.000 --> 01:56:35.000] because we're going to run out of time here in a minute [01:56:35.000 --> 01:56:37.000] do you have my [01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:39.000] e-mail [01:56:39.000 --> 01:56:41.000] yes I've e-mailed it incidentally [01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:43.000] did you get that fraudulent document [01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:45.000] I e-mailed you about a week ago [01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:47.000] I don't know [01:56:47.000 --> 01:56:49.000] what your e-mail address [01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:51.000] is so I don't know [01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:53.000] okay I'll just e-mail you [01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:55.000] the info [01:56:55.000 --> 01:56:57.000] e-mail me again I get about [01:56:57.000 --> 01:56:59.000] three pages of e-mail a day [01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:01.000] so okay [01:57:01.000 --> 01:57:03.000] that's a real good document cost me $25 [01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:05.000] it took me two months to get it [01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:07.000] but anyway I'll remind you of it [01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:09.000] have a good night [01:57:09.000 --> 01:57:11.000] okay [01:57:11.000 --> 01:57:13.000] give me an e-mail in in the morning [01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:15.000] or tonight [01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:17.000] I'll look at it in the morning [01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:19.000] give me a contact number as well [01:57:19.000 --> 01:57:21.000] okay [01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:23.000] thank you [01:57:23.000 --> 01:57:25.000] okay thank you [01:57:25.000 --> 01:57:27.000] this is Randy Kelton [01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:29.000] Debra Stephens Eddie Craig [01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:31.000] we've got one minute left [01:57:31.000 --> 01:57:33.000] let me go [01:57:33.000 --> 01:57:35.000] to Marty [01:57:35.000 --> 01:57:37.000] in Minnesota [01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:39.000] let's see [01:57:39.000 --> 01:57:41.000] there you go Marty [01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:43.000] quickly we've only got a minute left [01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:45.000] I got a couple questions [01:57:45.000 --> 01:57:47.000] so I'll give you the simple one [01:57:47.000 --> 01:57:49.000] why [01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:51.000] why do you always use black [01:57:51.000 --> 01:57:53.000] 6 edition [01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:55.000] wait do that again [01:57:55.000 --> 01:57:57.000] why what [01:57:57.000 --> 01:57:59.000] why do you always use [01:57:59.000 --> 01:58:01.000] black law dictionary [01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:03.000] 6 edition [01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:05.000] okay I've heard that before [01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:07.000] but I haven't messed with it much [01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:09.000] uh [01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:11.000] I really couldn't answer that [01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:13.000] at the moment I've heard it [01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:15.000] I just don't remember what the reason was [01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:17.000] interesting I would like to know that [01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:19.000] I gotta figure that out [01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:21.000] you stumped the chomp [01:58:23.000 --> 01:58:25.000] okay I'm sorry [01:58:25.000 --> 01:58:27.000] we are out of time we've got 25 seconds left [01:58:27.000 --> 01:58:29.000] this is Randy Kelton [01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:31.000] Debra Stephens Eddie Craig [01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:33.000] we will be back [01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:35.000] Monday with Eddie and Debra [01:58:35.000 --> 01:58:37.000] Debra and I'll be back [01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:39.000] Thursday and [01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:41.000] thank you all for listening [01:58:41.000 --> 01:58:43.000] been a great show [01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:45.000] don't forget our fundraiser [01:58:45.000 --> 01:58:47.000] thank you and good night [01:58:49.000 --> 01:58:51.000] Bibles for America [01:58:51.000 --> 01:58:53.000] is offering absolutely free [01:58:53.000 --> 01:58:55.000] a unique study Bible called [01:58:55.000 --> 01:58:57.000] the New Testament recovery version [01:58:57.000 --> 01:58:59.000] the New Testament recovery version [01:58:59.000 --> 01:59:01.000] has over 9000 footnotes [01:59:01.000 --> 01:59:03.000] that explain what the Bible says [01:59:03.000 --> 01:59:05.000] verse by verse helping you to [01:59:05.000 --> 01:59:07.000] know God and to know the meaning [01:59:07.000 --> 01:59:09.000] of life order your free copy [01:59:09.000 --> 01:59:11.000] today from Bibles for America [01:59:11.000 --> 01:59:13.000] call us toll free at [01:59:13.000 --> 01:59:15.000] 888-551-0102 [01:59:15.000 --> 01:59:17.000] or visit us online [01:59:17.000 --> 01:59:19.000] at BFA.org [01:59:19.000 --> 01:59:21.000] this translation [01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:23.000] is highly accurate and it comes with [01:59:23.000 --> 01:59:25.000] over 13000 cross references [01:59:25.000 --> 01:59:27.000] plus charts and maps [01:59:27.000 --> 01:59:29.000] and an outline for every book of the Bible [01:59:29.000 --> 01:59:31.000] this is truly a Bible you can [01:59:31.000 --> 01:59:33.000] understand to get your free copy [01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:35.000] of the New Testament recovery version [01:59:35.000 --> 01:59:37.000] call us toll free at [01:59:37.000 --> 01:59:39.000] 888-551-0102 [01:59:39.000 --> 01:59:41.000] that's 888-551-0102 [01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:43.000] or visit us online [01:59:43.000 --> 01:59:45.000] at BFA.org [01:59:45.000 --> 01:59:47.000] or visit us online at [01:59:47.000 --> 02:00:15.000] BFA.org