[00:00.000 --> 00:08.000]  In a recession, tightening your belt is usually a good thing, but ladies, be advised.
[00:08.000 --> 00:13.000]  A new study finds men actually prefer larger women during stressful times.
[00:13.000 --> 00:17.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll tell you why that is in a moment.
[00:17.000 --> 00:19.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[00:19.000 --> 00:23.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:23.000 --> 00:28.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:28.000 --> 00:33.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:33.000 --> 00:36.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[00:36.000 --> 00:43.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[00:43.000 --> 00:46.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[00:46.000 --> 00:51.000]  Men are said to prefer slimmer women because they appear younger and more fertile.
[00:51.000 --> 00:57.000]  But a new study finds that during hard times, men are more attracted to ladies with larger waistlines.
[00:57.000 --> 01:01.000]  British researchers split 80 volunteers into two groups.
[01:01.000 --> 01:05.000]  Half were exposed to stress through mock job interviews and mental math tests.
[01:05.000 --> 01:08.000]  Later, both groups studied pictures of women.
[01:08.000 --> 01:15.000]  The men in the stress group consistently found normal and overweight women more physically attractive than the more laid-back guys.
[01:15.000 --> 01:22.000]  The researchers' conclusion? Men view robust females as more mature and better equipped to cope with rough situations.
[01:22.000 --> 01:26.000]  Huh, in tough times, maybe size really does matter.
[01:26.000 --> 01:31.000]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:34.000 --> 01:38.000]  As if your kids needed another reason to brush their teeth, here's one more.
[01:38.000 --> 01:44.000]  A plastic chemical used in fillings could cause small but long-term changes in children's behavior.
[01:44.000 --> 01:48.000]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back with details in a moment.
[01:48.000 --> 01:53.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:53.000 --> 01:58.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:58.000 --> 02:03.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[02:03.000 --> 02:06.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[02:06.000 --> 02:13.000]  This message is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[02:13.000 --> 02:16.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[02:17.000 --> 02:20.000]  Here's some not-so-smiley news for kids with cavities.
[02:20.000 --> 02:27.000]  A plastic resin in dental fillings has been linked to behavioral changes and making youngsters more anti-social.
[02:27.000 --> 02:34.000]  Biscuitol A or BPA is the mainstay for treating cavities as an alternative to amalgam, which contains mercury.
[02:34.000 --> 02:44.000]  But a five-year study of more than 500 children found kids with BPA fillings scored worse when asked if they had trouble making friends or felt anxious or depressed.
[02:44.000 --> 02:55.000]  The study didn't prove BPA caused the behavioral shift, the authors noted, but previous research has linked BPA exposure to hyperactivity and aggressive behavior in young children.
[02:55.000 --> 03:22.000]  I'm Dr. Cameron Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[03:22.000 --> 03:31.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Dennis Stevens, Eddie Craig in Rural Law Radio, and we're talking to Luther in Texas.
[03:31.000 --> 03:42.000]  Most of what you will deal with will be the Code of Criminal Procedure and Rules of Civil Procedure.
[03:42.000 --> 03:57.000]  If you're dealing with a licensing issue, then you're likely to get into the administrative code and the business and professions code.
[03:57.000 --> 04:13.000]  But if you go to a law firm and get their old O'Connor's manuals, you will wind up with all of those. They have a practice guide on probate, business and commerce.
[04:13.000 --> 04:35.000]  You have the torches and remedies. There are only about four or five codes. And when I have a copy of business and commerce and business and professions and torches and remedies, torches and remedies I use on occasion.
[04:35.000 --> 04:47.000]  The civil trials, O'Connor's civil trials use that one all the time. Code of Criminal Procedure, Procedure, Penal Code, because of what we do, we use that all the time.
[04:47.000 --> 04:55.000]  But those three are about it. The fourth one, the torches and remedies we use seldom.
[04:55.000 --> 05:08.000]  And generally something will reference that either from some case law. I haven't went through and read the torches and remedies.
[05:08.000 --> 05:24.000]  Maybe I should, but got too many to read. If you go through Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure, Rules of Civil Procedure, you will have a very good grounding for just about any situation you would get into.
[05:24.000 --> 05:31.000]  Does that pretty well answer your question?
[05:31.000 --> 05:43.000]  So that's, I need to give hands on litigation guides that are known as Texas O'Connor's civil trials or civil suits and their old O'Connor's manuals from law firms.
[05:43.000 --> 05:57.000]  Absolutely. You call two or three law firms, one of them will tell you to come down all of them off form and they don't have to do it themselves. And you will find that they are absolutely wonderful tools.
[05:57.000 --> 06:13.000]  Michele O'Connor was an ex-Supreme Court Justice and she has done an excellent job. She also has O'Connor's civil forms of O'Connor's causes of action. Wonderful guys.
[06:13.000 --> 06:27.000]  They have blank forms, real quick story, helped a friend of mine, he's a federal researcher, filed a petition for temporary restraining order, prepared one, sent it to me, said, what do you think?
[06:27.000 --> 06:39.000]  Said, it's a piece of crap again. He said, think you can do better? I said, sure. So I sent him one. He went and filed it. He didn't expect the other attorney to show up. The attorney did.
[06:39.000 --> 06:50.000]  He gives his temporary restraining order. The attorney came out and said, are you an attorney? And he said, no, I'm not. Did you write this? And he said, well, I have some help.
[06:50.000 --> 07:05.000]  He said, this is very good. The kid came to me and told me that and I thought, what in the world is going on here? I pulled that puppy right out of O'Connor's civil forms.
[07:05.000 --> 07:23.000]  And it occurred to me. This guy was a young lawyer. They always give the young lawyers the process. And he saw this document and it looked exactly like theirs. Same structure, same case law, everything.
[07:23.000 --> 07:34.000]  He didn't know yet that they had written all of their forms right out of the O'Connor's guide. So it looked just like his and he was wondering how we did that.
[07:34.000 --> 07:48.000]  And that's what really opened my eyes because the judge looked at it and this looked exactly like something a lawyer would give him. So it gave him more confidence in the document.
[07:48.000 --> 07:58.000]  The judge didn't have to do. He didn't have to look at the whole document. Only that portion of the document that was specific to this issue.
[07:58.000 --> 08:18.000]  This will get you way down the road. And in the O'Connor's civil trials, almost everything is in there. If you go on to juristimprudence.com and look at the writ of habeas corpus.
[08:18.000 --> 08:32.000]  Now it's rather large, but it's right out of O'Connor's. The structure in it, when the judge opens it up and looks at it, it's right out of O'Connor's exactly the way he'd expect to see it.
[08:32.000 --> 08:44.000]  Everything he would expect to see in a particular place is in that place. So when he sees it, he doesn't even have to pay attention to it. He just cruise right over.
[08:44.000 --> 08:50.000]  If you have them out of place, the judge has to read the whole thing.
[08:50.000 --> 09:03.000]  This goes to not even to politics, but this is how humans work. We need to pay attention to the humanity that we're dealing with.
[09:03.000 --> 09:15.000]  A lot of this that the prosaise complain about is not because the prosaise is because they don't understand where the judge lives.
[09:15.000 --> 09:32.000]  I once had a, when I sued the sheriff in Wise County, a young attorney came in and gave me a stack of discovery that he had taken the book and set it on a copier and copied both pages onto one.
[09:32.000 --> 09:38.000]  And I said to the judge, your honor, does the court have a magnifying glass?
[09:38.000 --> 09:48.000]  And he looked kind of strange at me and he picked up the documents and looked at them and then just flung them out in the courtroom and just railed on this attorney.
[09:48.000 --> 09:55.000]  What are you trying to blind me? And just went on and on about how much reading he had to do every day and you sent me this.
[09:55.000 --> 10:03.000]  And I watched him a little bit and it became clear he wasn't the least bit upset at this lawyer. He was just teaching him.
[10:03.000 --> 10:07.000]  You can be sure the lawyer is never going to do that again.
[10:07.000 --> 10:19.000]  But it is important for us to understand more than just the law, but how human beings work when they adjudicate the law.
[10:19.000 --> 10:22.000]  Okay, I think I've blabbed on enough about that.
[10:22.000 --> 10:25.000]  One more quick question before you all let me go if you don't mind.
[10:25.000 --> 10:28.000]  All righty.
[10:28.000 --> 10:47.000]  Before I commit to traveling around in my private car without a driver's license because I'm not engaged in transportation and without registration stickers and license plates and all these things that are supposed to be only geared for transportation,
[10:47.000 --> 11:04.000]  how do I make sure that I cut my ties properly with my EPS as far as does my license need to expire? Can it expire during a suspension?
[11:04.000 --> 11:15.000]  I mean, how do I cut clean ties so that when I go out on the road and attempt to travel in my private vehicle, I don't have something come back on me that I didn't quite understand.
[11:15.000 --> 11:17.000]  How do I?
[11:17.000 --> 11:22.000]  Okay, let me address part of that and then I'll go to Eddie for the rest.
[11:22.000 --> 11:24.000]  All right.
[11:24.000 --> 11:28.000]  Take your battles very careful.
[11:28.000 --> 11:34.000]  Understand that this doesn't look like a really big issue to you.
[11:34.000 --> 11:53.000]  When you look at how much revenue these local officials draw in with the traffic issue and you're wasting a specter that will cut off that spigot, you're going to be in for a real battle.
[11:53.000 --> 11:55.000]  I do something a little different.
[11:55.000 --> 11:58.000]  I have a license on my vehicle.
[11:58.000 --> 12:01.000]  I have a driver's license in my pocket.
[12:01.000 --> 12:07.000]  But I also have a DOT number on the back of my vehicle.
[12:07.000 --> 12:09.000]  And it is a vehicle.
[12:09.000 --> 12:14.000]  Eddie will raise an issue with that, but technically it's a vehicle.
[12:14.000 --> 12:18.000]  I'm just not using it as one.
[12:18.000 --> 12:28.000]  And that DOT number is noticed to the officer that I'm not using this as a vehicle.
[12:28.000 --> 12:39.000]  I'm using it as a private conveyance as I am registered with the Department of Transportation as a private operator, not in commerce.
[12:39.000 --> 12:45.000]  The last time I was pulled over, the officer asked me for my license.
[12:45.000 --> 12:47.000]  He asked me for the license.
[12:47.000 --> 12:52.000]  I said, I have one, but before I show it to you, did you notice that number on the back of my car?
[12:52.000 --> 12:58.000]  I said, yeah, I did. He said, no, I didn't. I said, well, go back there and notice it.
[12:58.000 --> 13:02.000]  And he said, well, I need to see your license and profanity.
[13:02.000 --> 13:04.000]  So I gave him to him.
[13:04.000 --> 13:13.000]  And he went back to his car and he came back and he gave me a warning for 68 and a 55.
[13:13.000 --> 13:15.000]  He did not write me a ticket.
[13:15.000 --> 13:17.000]  I did not have a fight with him.
[13:17.000 --> 13:21.000]  Had he written me a ticket, I would not have tried to give him anything.
[13:21.000 --> 13:25.000]  Give him any legal advice on the side of the highway.
[13:25.000 --> 13:31.000]  I would have simply filed criminal charges against him with the justice of peace.
[13:31.000 --> 13:34.000]  I do like Bushwack.
[13:34.000 --> 13:43.000]  Okay, with that said, Eddie, you want to pick this up and terror me to pieces?
[13:43.000 --> 13:51.000]  No, you go ahead and live in whatever world you want through there. I still don't think that DOT number is going to work out quite as well as everyone would hope.
[13:51.000 --> 13:56.000]  As far as what the caller is asking for, there is no such animal.
[13:56.000 --> 14:05.000]  As long as they can get away with stealing what they're stealing, they will never willingly let you out of the system.
[14:05.000 --> 14:15.000]  They will continue to insist, no matter what you do, that you belong in the system and you are engaging in the activities covered by that system.
[14:15.000 --> 14:29.000]  The only way you will get out of it is to learn how to fight back properly and sufficiently so that by the time that they actually get around to overturning your case,
[14:29.000 --> 14:35.000]  you're able to sue the cop that started that whole snowball rolling down the hill thing.
[14:35.000 --> 14:39.000]  But that takes a lot of time and study.
[14:39.000 --> 14:43.000]  I have cut that curve down for you folks greatly.
[14:43.000 --> 14:49.000]  It took me two decades plus to get this information down to where it was useful,
[14:49.000 --> 14:54.000]  plus some outside help and someone has been doing it just about as long as I have.
[14:54.000 --> 14:57.000]  And he happens to be an attorney.
[14:57.000 --> 15:03.000]  So given that, there is no silver bullet to what you're wanting.
[15:03.000 --> 15:05.000]  It does not exist.
[15:05.000 --> 15:20.000]  Every individual will have to fight this case until enough precedent has been set to make the cops realize opening that gate unleashes a flood they don't want to be caught in.
[15:20.000 --> 15:27.000]  Only then will people be able to turn everything in and say, I'm done. I'm not participating.
[15:27.000 --> 15:32.000]  And the cops say, okay.
[15:32.000 --> 15:35.000]  Yes, this is all political.
[15:35.000 --> 15:46.000]  And the only way we'll win it is politically won't win it based on law because the law is absolutely clearly in your favor.
[15:46.000 --> 15:52.000]  So we have to make it more costly for them and Eddie is absolutely right.
[15:52.000 --> 15:59.000]  So Eddie is the ability to have a seminar on Sunday at the bookstore.
[15:59.000 --> 16:01.000]  Is that a goal for this week?
[16:01.000 --> 16:02.000]  Yes, it is.
[16:02.000 --> 16:07.000]  And could I purchase Jurisdictionary and your traffic seminars there?
[16:07.000 --> 16:12.000]  You can get my traffic seminar but you can't get Jurisdictionary unless the bookstore sells it.
[16:12.000 --> 16:16.000]  And I don't know if they do or not, but you can order it off of the rule law website.
[16:16.000 --> 16:18.000]  I know that.
[16:18.000 --> 16:19.000]  Okay.
[16:19.000 --> 16:21.000]  Thank you gentlemen.
[16:21.000 --> 16:22.000]  Appreciate your time.
[16:22.000 --> 16:23.000]  Yes, sir.
[16:23.000 --> 16:24.000]  Thanks for calling in.
[16:24.000 --> 16:25.000]  Fine.
[16:25.000 --> 16:26.000]  All right.
[16:26.000 --> 16:29.000]  Who is our next caller up there, Randy?
[16:29.000 --> 16:35.000]  Okay, we're going to Doug in Ohio.
[16:35.000 --> 16:37.000]  Hello, Mr. Doug.
[16:37.000 --> 16:40.000]  I'm afraid your time is up.
[16:40.000 --> 16:43.000]  You didn't get your question in quickly enough.
[16:43.000 --> 16:44.000]  Okay.
[16:44.000 --> 16:45.000]  Hang on, Doug.
[16:45.000 --> 16:47.000]  We will pick you up on the other side.
[16:47.000 --> 16:52.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Denver Stephen, Eddie Craig, rule of law radio.
[16:52.000 --> 17:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:01.000 --> 17:16.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:16.000 --> 17:41.000]  We'll be right back.
[17:41.000 --> 18:07.000]  We'll be right back.
[18:07.000 --> 18:33.000]  We'll be right back.
[18:33.000 --> 19:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[19:01.000 --> 19:27.000]  We'll be right back.
[19:27.000 --> 19:28.000]  Okay.
[19:28.000 --> 19:29.000]  We are back.
[19:29.000 --> 19:34.000]  This is Kelton, Denver Stephen, Eddie Craig, rule of law radio, and we're talking to Doug
[19:34.000 --> 19:35.000]  in Ohio.
[19:35.000 --> 19:42.000]  Doug, here you have a foreclosure comment or question.
[19:42.000 --> 19:43.000]  Yes, Randy.
[19:43.000 --> 19:45.000]  Good evening to you and Eddie.
[19:45.000 --> 19:50.000]  I'm kind of a novice pro-save and banging along in this case.
[19:50.000 --> 19:57.000]  We've been contending from the beginning that they never ratified commencement.
[19:57.000 --> 20:01.000]  Not the real party in interest and therefore don't have standing, you know, that kind of
[20:01.000 --> 20:02.000]  thing.
[20:02.000 --> 20:03.000]  Okay.
[20:03.000 --> 20:04.000]  Hold on.
[20:04.000 --> 20:08.000]  How did you get to not real party in interest?
[20:08.000 --> 20:13.000]  The fellow helping me said that they did not have proof of the notes, ownership of them,
[20:13.000 --> 20:19.000]  a proof of ownership of the notes or it could not produce the original note.
[20:19.000 --> 20:20.000]  Okay.
[20:20.000 --> 20:27.000]  So you are talking to someone who is a little bit behind.
[20:27.000 --> 20:32.000]  Is Ohio a, do you have a mortgage or a deed of trust?
[20:32.000 --> 20:33.000]  Mortgage.
[20:33.000 --> 20:37.000]  Is MERS included in the mortgage?
[20:37.000 --> 20:39.000]  Oh, yeah.
[20:39.000 --> 20:42.000]  Did the lender sign the mortgage?
[20:42.000 --> 20:47.000]  Did the lender sign the original lender?
[20:47.000 --> 20:49.000]  Any lender.
[20:49.000 --> 20:51.000]  I don't believe they did.
[20:51.000 --> 20:52.000]  Okay.
[20:52.000 --> 20:54.000]  I signed it.
[20:54.000 --> 20:55.000]  Okay.
[20:55.000 --> 20:59.000]  The ratification of commencement is horse poop.
[20:59.000 --> 21:05.000]  To put it technically, all ratification of commencement is a standing or subject matter
[21:05.000 --> 21:07.000]  jurisdiction actually.
[21:07.000 --> 21:09.000]  That won't get you anywhere.
[21:09.000 --> 21:15.000]  What will get you somewhere is to read that mortgage.
[21:15.000 --> 21:21.000]  If MERS is included in the mortgage and MERS is named as the nominee in the beneficiary.
[21:21.000 --> 21:27.000]  If you go back to your note on the note, you are the borrower.
[21:27.000 --> 21:39.000]  The lender is the beneficiary of the payments from the note.
[21:39.000 --> 21:45.000]  Now you go to the mortgage.
[21:45.000 --> 21:50.000]  In the mortgage, you grant certain concessions to the lender.
[21:50.000 --> 21:57.000]  Primarily, you grant the lender a claim against your property.
[21:57.000 --> 22:03.000]  So that if you default, he doesn't have to sue you.
[22:03.000 --> 22:06.000]  He can do an interim against the property.
[22:06.000 --> 22:09.000]  He can make a claim directly against the property.
[22:09.000 --> 22:17.000]  Otherwise, he'd have to sue you personally and then get a judgment, get a claim against you,
[22:17.000 --> 22:23.000]  and then ask for the court for a judgment against your property.
[22:23.000 --> 22:30.000]  In effect, you have granted the lender a claim against the property.
[22:30.000 --> 22:37.000]  This allows the lender to put in place restrictions on what you do with that property.
[22:37.000 --> 22:44.000]  Those restrictions are essentially in terms of maintaining the value of the collateral
[22:44.000 --> 22:47.000]  and not liquidating the collateral.
[22:47.000 --> 22:51.000]  If he didn't have a claim against the property, you could liquidate the collateral.
[22:51.000 --> 22:54.000]  That's reasonable.
[22:54.000 --> 23:01.000]  And then if Merge is included in there, Merge is appointed as a nominee.
[23:01.000 --> 23:06.000]  A nominee is a form of an agent.
[23:06.000 --> 23:21.000]  But if the lender did not sign the contract, the borrower has no power to appoint an agent for the lender.
[23:21.000 --> 23:23.000]  Only the lender can do that.
[23:23.000 --> 23:32.000]  And the lender didn't sign the contract, so Merge was never appointed.
[23:32.000 --> 23:35.000]  Good luck, guys.
[23:35.000 --> 23:38.000]  You know, it's taken us a long time.
[23:38.000 --> 23:43.000]  In the last few days, it kind of dawned on me.
[23:43.000 --> 23:46.000]  You know, I talk to people about the fact that I'm an engineer.
[23:46.000 --> 23:55.000]  And as an engineer, one of the hardest things for me to do is get outside the box.
[23:55.000 --> 24:00.000]  Get outside what I think I already know.
[24:00.000 --> 24:12.000]  Why did it take so long to realize the lender didn't sign the contract so they never appointed the agent?
[24:12.000 --> 24:20.000]  Merge is acting totally without any contractual authority of any kind.
[24:20.000 --> 24:30.000]  I suggest you stay away from arguments that do not go to the contracts involved.
[24:30.000 --> 24:31.000]  Okay.
[24:31.000 --> 24:37.000]  This argument about, show me the note.
[24:37.000 --> 24:44.000]  The courts essentially told that they trust the litigant.
[24:44.000 --> 24:48.000]  The litigant comes in and makes a prima facie case.
[24:48.000 --> 24:57.000]  He asserts to the court under oath that he is the holder of the note and has authority to collect on the note.
[24:57.000 --> 25:03.000]  That establishes a prima facie case.
[25:03.000 --> 25:07.000]  Just asking him to produce the notice from sufficient.
[25:07.000 --> 25:23.000]  You have to come in and say that you have reason to believe based on these facts that this individual, this entity does not hold the note.
[25:23.000 --> 25:26.000]  You have to overcome his prima facie.
[25:26.000 --> 25:30.000]  You can't just say show me the note if you can't show me the note you don't have standing.
[25:30.000 --> 25:33.000]  That's not enough.
[25:33.000 --> 25:39.000]  You have to come in and say I believe he doesn't have standing because of this fact and this fact and this fact.
[25:39.000 --> 25:45.000]  Now you move prima facie to your side and this is what these guys are missing.
[25:45.000 --> 25:48.000]  Give them some facts to move prima facie.
[25:48.000 --> 25:52.000]  There's another claim that you can make one we've been doing.
[25:52.000 --> 25:56.000]  It's FTCPA.
[25:56.000 --> 26:07.000]  If a entity or person, person in this context is used in the legal context, which doesn't mean living human being,
[26:07.000 --> 26:12.000]  exclusively, it can be a living human being, but it can also be a legal fiction.
[26:12.000 --> 26:20.000]  They trust a corporation or some other, the LLC or some other legal entity.
[26:20.000 --> 26:30.000]  If the entity makes a claim of authority to, or if they make a legal claim of any kind,
[26:30.000 --> 26:35.000]  you have no duty to disprove that claim under UCC.
[26:35.000 --> 26:36.000]  They have a duty.
[26:36.000 --> 26:43.000]  If you challenge a claim, if you dispute it, they have a duty to prove it up under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.
[26:43.000 --> 26:51.000]  Very specifically, when an entity is attempting to collect a debt,
[26:51.000 --> 27:00.000]  and collecting a debt means that they are trying to collect United States money.
[27:00.000 --> 27:08.000]  If they're trying to collect United States money and they make a claim that they, to take an action,
[27:08.000 --> 27:12.000]  and they don't have the authority to take the action or don't intend to take the action,
[27:12.000 --> 27:19.000]  that's a violation of the Act, 1692 F, I believe.
[27:19.000 --> 27:29.000]  If someone makes a claim and you demand that the claimant validate the debt,
[27:29.000 --> 27:37.000]  they are subject to statutory estoppel from any further collections until they prove up the debt.
[27:37.000 --> 27:43.000]  Now we go to the note.
[27:43.000 --> 27:51.000]  The courts, though, they don't necessarily have to produce the original note,
[27:51.000 --> 27:59.000]  but they do have to show a chain of holdership of the note,
[27:59.000 --> 28:08.000]  an unbroken chain of holdership of the note, to the person or entity claiming authority to collect.
[28:08.000 --> 28:14.000]  That is something that I've asserted along the line here in my motions in affidavits is that there's an unbroken,
[28:14.000 --> 28:23.000]  and I have a securitization audit and an analysis by affidavit that shows that they don't, there's no chain of assignment.
[28:23.000 --> 28:29.000]  The company, the original lender, went bankrupt and then...
[28:29.000 --> 28:34.000]  Okay, let me back up again. Have you looked in the county records at the documents in the county recorders office?
[28:34.000 --> 28:36.000]  Oh, yeah.
[28:36.000 --> 28:44.000]  Okay, that's where all the action is. I take it there is a deed of trust with a lender's name on it,
[28:44.000 --> 28:49.000]  and that lender no longer exists.
[28:49.000 --> 28:56.000]  Right, and then the chain of assignment, excuse me, the assignment was done four years after the...
[28:56.000 --> 29:00.000]  Who is the current claimant?
[29:00.000 --> 29:04.000]  Wells Fargo, whom I've never done any business with.
[29:04.000 --> 29:14.000]  Okay, who assigned the note and deed of trust to Wells Fargo, and when did they do that?
[29:14.000 --> 29:23.000]  I believe MERS did. I signed the note in 2006. I believe that MERS, or FMF Capital, the original lender,
[29:23.000 --> 29:30.000]  signed it to MERS as nominee, or I'm not sure, over to Wells Fargo in 2011.
[29:30.000 --> 29:38.000]  Okay, look at that. There should be an assignment, a corporate assignment, in the county record.
[29:38.000 --> 29:51.000]  And read it, because they screwed these things up really bad. Make sure it says MERS acting as nominee for whoever the lender is.
[29:51.000 --> 29:56.000]  Hold on, okay, we'll get addressed a little more of that when we come back on the other side.
[29:56.000 --> 30:00.000]  Randy Kelton Davis, David Craig, we'll be right back.
[30:00.000 --> 30:06.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11th.
[30:06.000 --> 30:13.000]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:13.000 --> 30:16.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:16.000 --> 30:18.000]  Thousands of my fellow force responders have died.
[30:18.000 --> 30:20.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:20.000 --> 30:21.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:21.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:25.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:25.000 --> 30:27.000]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:31.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:31.000 --> 30:38.000]  HempUSA.org has a revolutionary wonder food for detoxing the body and rebuilding the immune system.
[30:38.000 --> 30:47.000]  Micro-plant powder can help unclog arteries and soften heart valves while removing heavy metals, virus, fungus, bacteria, and parasites.
[30:47.000 --> 30:51.000]  Plus, it cleans and purifies the blood, lungs, stomach, and colon.
[30:51.000 --> 30:54.000]  Keep your body clean with micro-plant powder.
[30:54.000 --> 31:01.000]  Visit us at hempUSA.org or call 908-69-12608 today.
[31:01.000 --> 31:07.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy.
[31:07.000 --> 31:10.000]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[31:10.000 --> 31:13.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[31:13.000 --> 31:14.000]  Brave New Books?
[31:14.000 --> 31:21.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Albert Griffin.
[31:21.000 --> 31:25.000]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[31:25.000 --> 31:28.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[31:28.000 --> 31:33.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[31:33.000 --> 31:37.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[31:37.000 --> 31:44.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[31:44.000 --> 31:48.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[31:48.000 --> 31:53.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[31:53.000 --> 32:19.000]  So get them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[32:19.000 --> 32:48.000]  Yeah, I won't let you put the world over my eyes.
[32:48.000 --> 32:54.000]  Okay, we are back.
[32:54.000 --> 33:01.000]  I've been doing a lot of work on this.
[33:01.000 --> 33:11.000]  I've been trying to get this down to issues that a judge can wrap his head around.
[33:11.000 --> 33:14.000]  This showed me the note issue.
[33:14.000 --> 33:21.000]  You've had the banks jump all over it, and we have a lot of conflicting case law.
[33:21.000 --> 33:28.000]  Now, we can go to that fight that fight with the conflicting case law,
[33:28.000 --> 33:33.000]  or we can find a simpler way to do this.
[33:33.000 --> 33:39.000]  And frankly, the simpler way to do this is right there in the contract.
[33:39.000 --> 33:47.000]  These guys are such a bunch of losers that absolutely cannot get it right,
[33:47.000 --> 33:50.000]  and you don't have to go very far to get it done.
[33:50.000 --> 33:58.000]  And what I'm going to suggest to you is a little stealth tactic.
[33:58.000 --> 34:03.000]  In normal life, if I have a problem with you, I'm going to come to you,
[34:03.000 --> 34:08.000]  and I'm going to look you right in the eye, and I'm going to tell you what my problem is.
[34:08.000 --> 34:11.000]  And I'm not going to care if you like it or not.
[34:11.000 --> 34:13.000]  I'm going to tell you.
[34:13.000 --> 34:21.000]  And that works well in civil interaction, but we're not talking about civil interaction here.
[34:21.000 --> 34:24.000]  We're talking about legal interaction.
[34:24.000 --> 34:29.000]  And in legal, pushback is a whole lot better.
[34:29.000 --> 34:33.000]  So let's not go to them and open the door and say,
[34:33.000 --> 34:39.000]  I am fiction to kick you right here in this left testicle,
[34:39.000 --> 34:43.000]  because they're going to turn around where you can't get to them.
[34:43.000 --> 34:46.000]  So let's sneak up on them.
[34:46.000 --> 34:49.000]  And here's how we do that.
[34:49.000 --> 34:57.000]  Every county who keeps a set of county records, property records,
[34:57.000 --> 35:06.000]  has a very powerful incentive to ensure that those records are accurate.
[35:06.000 --> 35:15.000]  If you can look at the county record and determine from the records on their face
[35:15.000 --> 35:23.000]  that one of the records is faulty, for instance, you have a mortgage by some mortgage company,
[35:23.000 --> 35:31.000]  and then you have an assignment by MERS to another company.
[35:31.000 --> 35:41.000]  But the date of that assignment is after the demise of the first company.
[35:41.000 --> 35:45.000]  Then you can go in and say,
[35:45.000 --> 35:55.000]  MERS claims to be acting as the beneficiary for this company, because this company doesn't exist.
[35:55.000 --> 36:03.000]  And there's nothing in the record to show that this company transferred its interest to some other interest.
[36:03.000 --> 36:13.000]  So therefore, when this interest entity went out of existence, it abandoned its claim.
[36:13.000 --> 36:26.000]  And asked the court to rule that there's nothing in the record showing a transfer of claim from the original claimant to another party,
[36:26.000 --> 36:36.000]  to the party that claims to grant authority to the acting party.
[36:36.000 --> 36:44.000]  This can be determined from the four corners of the documents in the county record and ask the court to declare,
[36:44.000 --> 36:50.000]  to petition the court to rule that this document is void on its face.
[36:50.000 --> 36:52.000]  That's Bushwack.
[36:52.000 --> 36:57.000]  Okay, should I do that even if the magistrate hasn't granted summary judgment?
[36:57.000 --> 37:02.000]  You don't care what the magistrate has done.
[37:02.000 --> 37:09.000]  This is a whole different issue. If you can get the court to show that this document is void,
[37:09.000 --> 37:14.000]  then you go back to the original to the court that made this ruling and say,
[37:14.000 --> 37:19.000]  this entity, file this documentation with you.
[37:19.000 --> 37:22.000]  And this documentation was fraudulent.
[37:22.000 --> 37:27.000]  You go to the grand jury and charge them a tamper with a government document.
[37:27.000 --> 37:32.000]  And you go to this court and challenge the subject matter jurisdiction of the court saying,
[37:32.000 --> 37:41.000]  this document, because it was fraudulent, was insufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of this court.
[37:41.000 --> 37:46.000]  Subject matter jurisdiction can be challenged at any time.
[37:46.000 --> 37:52.000]  Keep in mind, we have a couple of hundred years of jurisprudence.
[37:52.000 --> 37:59.000]  But in that time, there have been lots and lots of dirty rotten scoundrels,
[37:59.000 --> 38:03.000]  especially politicians who are all dirty rotten scoundrels.
[38:03.000 --> 38:11.000]  And the problem they have is, is they don't know which scoundrel is the dirtiest and rottenest.
[38:11.000 --> 38:21.000]  So they have to put protections in place if for nothing else could protect them from themselves from each other.
[38:21.000 --> 38:29.000]  If it seems like something should be a certain way, it probably is.
[38:29.000 --> 38:32.000]  You just need to look and find it.
[38:32.000 --> 38:40.000]  If it seems like something is wrong, it's probably adjudicated as wrong in law with 200 years of practice.
[38:40.000 --> 38:45.000]  Most everything that somebody can do wrong has been done wrong at one time or another.
[38:45.000 --> 38:53.000]  So we all, all the states have a very effective body of law.
[38:53.000 --> 39:04.000]  And the law itself is basically fair on its face, not necessarily by the intent of these corrupt politicians,
[39:04.000 --> 39:08.000]  but just because they are corrupt, they have to protect themselves from each other.
[39:08.000 --> 39:16.000]  Stop looking for a silver bullet. I've looked for a long time but not out there. I haven't found one.
[39:16.000 --> 39:28.000]  If there is a silver bullet, it's just getting yourself outside the box and look at what is it actually right in front of you.
[39:28.000 --> 39:41.000]  And if you have mercy in your mortgage and the lender did not sign the mortgage, these guys have a big problem.
[39:41.000 --> 39:45.000]  You know, how do I put that before the court by petition? Is that what you said?
[39:45.000 --> 39:49.000]  Yeah, you challenge the subject matter jurisdiction.
[39:49.000 --> 39:51.000]  Okay, okay.
[39:51.000 --> 39:57.000]  That this entity is unable to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction. Of course, they don't have any standing.
[39:57.000 --> 40:03.000]  Yeah, we've done that. We pretty much, I'm not sure if it was exactly by the mechanism you were describing,
[40:03.000 --> 40:10.000]  but we challenged the jurisdiction of the court through standing.
[40:10.000 --> 40:19.000]  Well, if you claim standing because the entity didn't produce the note, that's probably not going to get you very far.
[40:19.000 --> 40:20.000]  Okay.
[40:20.000 --> 40:23.000]  That's an esoteric argument.
[40:23.000 --> 40:35.000]  You're saying that they need to produce this note because we have reason to believe that after conservation of note, they did all these things.
[40:35.000 --> 40:41.000]  And, you know, there's all of this argument about, well, they sold the note.
[40:41.000 --> 40:45.000]  Okay, I'm the judge. Okay, so what?
[40:45.000 --> 40:52.000]  Well, they sold it several times. Okay, so what? How are you harmed?
[40:52.000 --> 41:00.000]  And you're going to say, well, I don't know who owns the note. Okay, how are you harmed?
[41:00.000 --> 41:07.000]  Well, if they foreclose on me, somebody else might come back next year and foreclose on me again.
[41:07.000 --> 41:15.000]  Okay, if that happens, then you can come to me, then you've been harmed.
[41:15.000 --> 41:20.000]  Until then, what they do is not really any of your business.
[41:20.000 --> 41:26.000]  And except that, in deeds of trust, it's generally paragraph 20.
[41:26.000 --> 41:38.000]  And I think it's the same for mortgages, where it authorizes the lender to sell a portion of the note or the entire note.
[41:38.000 --> 41:40.000]  You familiar with that paragraph?
[41:40.000 --> 41:42.000]  They're covenants.
[41:42.000 --> 41:47.000]  Okay, it authorizes the lender to sell a portion of the note or the entire note.
[41:47.000 --> 41:52.000]  And in mortgages and deeds of trust, both there are these brackets.
[41:52.000 --> 42:00.000]  And inside the brackets, it says, together with this security instrument.
[42:00.000 --> 42:13.000]  So if you have a servicer claiming authority to collect this note based on a possession or assignment of the security instrument,
[42:13.000 --> 42:19.000]  you have evidence that the note has, in fact, been negotiated to another entity.
[42:19.000 --> 42:29.000]  And there is no evidence of agency on the part of the servicer with that other entity.
[42:29.000 --> 42:38.000]  You have reason to believe they have breached paragraph 20 of the Mortgager deed of trust.
[42:38.000 --> 42:46.000]  A contractual violation is a whole lot easier for the judge to wrap his head around.
[42:46.000 --> 42:51.000]  Okay, and evidence of that agency would be in the county recording, county recorders office?
[42:51.000 --> 42:57.000]  You look what's in the, in the, do you want to see the documents in the county recorders office?
[42:57.000 --> 43:00.000]  That's where the action really is.
[43:00.000 --> 43:04.000]  Yeah, there is no such thing in there. I've been looked at the file.
[43:04.000 --> 43:08.000]  Okay. Have you tied all the documents together?
[43:08.000 --> 43:13.000]  Deed of Trust, are there any assignments in the record?
[43:13.000 --> 43:20.000]  There's only one. That's what I was saying that the original lender went out of business in about 2007.
[43:20.000 --> 43:22.000]  I signed the note and mortgage in 2006.
[43:22.000 --> 43:27.000]  And the only assignment in the record was done in 2011.
[43:27.000 --> 43:35.000]  Okay, so the assignment was made four years after the lender went out of business.
[43:35.000 --> 43:45.000]  Okay, there is an argument is that the assignment had to be made before the entity went out of business.
[43:45.000 --> 43:51.000]  The other argument is that the lender didn't sign the contract.
[43:51.000 --> 44:00.000]  So the lawyer never had any stand to start with. This is Randy Kelton, Deb Stewart, Teddy Craig, we'll blow radio, we'll finish up on the other side.
[44:00.000 --> 44:04.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:04.000 --> 44:07.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[44:07.000 --> 44:15.000]  The affordable, easy to understand, poor CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[44:15.000 --> 44:19.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:19.000 --> 44:23.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[44:28.000 --> 44:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[44:34.000 --> 44:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:43.000 --> 44:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[44:52.000 --> 44:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[44:56.000 --> 45:01.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:01.000 --> 45:06.000]  The Oklahoma City Bombing. Top 10 reasons to question the official story.
[45:06.000 --> 45:10.000]  Reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:10.000 --> 45:17.000]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:17.000 --> 45:25.000]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the Ryder truck bomb to the Murrah Building and detonated it.
[45:25.000 --> 45:33.000]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:33.000 --> 45:39.000]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fable John Doe number two, exiting the Ryder truck.
[45:39.000 --> 45:44.000]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing,
[45:44.000 --> 45:53.000]  no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing, including when he rented the Ryder truck,
[45:53.000 --> 45:57.000]  and in some cases have positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:57.000 --> 46:15.000]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:15.000 --> 46:30.000]  Oh, oh, oh. Oh, oh, oh. Yeah, always I must be careful with what I'm wishing for.
[46:30.000 --> 46:35.000]  When I'm hungry, I'd like to know just what I'm fishing for.
[46:35.000 --> 46:41.000]  I ain't asking for much, I ain't trying to be no glutton.
[46:41.000 --> 46:46.000]  I'm just here making my living, pushing buttons.
[46:46.000 --> 46:49.000]  Okay, ready to go back?
[46:49.000 --> 46:52.000]  Pushing buttons for Andy Kelton, Debbie Steed, and Betty Craig.
[46:52.000 --> 46:55.000]  We were already talking to Doug,
[46:55.000 --> 47:01.000]  and Doug, I could probably do eight hours on this issue.
[47:01.000 --> 47:06.000]  There are a great number of things that you can do.
[47:06.000 --> 47:11.000]  Where are you at in the process?
[47:11.000 --> 47:16.000]  About a month ago, the judge had granted summary judgment for the plaintiff,
[47:16.000 --> 47:24.000]  leaving me the opening to, according to Ohio Rule 53, to ask for findings of facts and conclusions of law,
[47:24.000 --> 47:31.000]  which I did do, and she ordered the plaintiff to provide proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law,
[47:31.000 --> 47:39.000]  because we're contending they've never put any facts into evidence at all during the whole time.
[47:39.000 --> 47:43.000]  Okay, hold on, back up on this.
[47:43.000 --> 47:56.000]  When they do that, make sure that any facts introduced are not facts claimed by the lawyer.
[47:56.000 --> 48:01.000]  Lawyers cannot testify.
[48:01.000 --> 48:05.000]  Only human beings can testify.
[48:05.000 --> 48:14.000]  So if the lawyer attempts to make a statement of fact out of his mouth, then you object to that as hearsay.
[48:14.000 --> 48:18.000]  That's all they've ever done is facts by the lawyer.
[48:18.000 --> 48:20.000]  Good.
[48:20.000 --> 48:22.000]  Object to those.
[48:22.000 --> 48:31.000]  The only way they can enter into facts is either bringing a witness on the stand or an affidavit from an affient,
[48:31.000 --> 48:34.000]  a verified affidavit.
[48:34.000 --> 48:35.000]  Okay.
[48:35.000 --> 48:37.000]  And look at the affidavits.
[48:37.000 --> 48:41.000]  I mean, the affidavit has to be verified.
[48:41.000 --> 48:44.000]  Look at the verification, especially.
[48:44.000 --> 48:47.000]  We have some incredible notaries.
[48:47.000 --> 48:49.000]  I just came across one day before yesterday.
[48:49.000 --> 48:55.000]  I was looking through this document, and this notary was a prophet.
[48:55.000 --> 48:57.000]  He was one of the prophets.
[48:57.000 --> 49:02.000]  Eight years ago, God came to him in a vision
[49:02.000 --> 49:11.000]  and told him that in four years, I'm sorry, four years ago, in 2008, in four years from now,
[49:11.000 --> 49:20.000]  this person is going to file an assignment in the county record in this case.
[49:20.000 --> 49:30.000]  So you can verify the signing today.
[49:30.000 --> 49:33.000]  The assignment was made in 2012.
[49:33.000 --> 49:36.000]  The day you want to juror at is 2008.
[49:36.000 --> 49:40.000]  These guys are such bunglers.
[49:40.000 --> 49:43.000]  Look at everything.
[49:43.000 --> 49:47.000]  Question everything.
[49:47.000 --> 49:51.000]  Might it be of any use to me to try a quiet title?
[49:51.000 --> 49:53.000]  Not yet.
[49:53.000 --> 49:54.000]  Okay.
[49:54.000 --> 49:56.000]  This goes to strategy.
[49:56.000 --> 49:59.000]  Before you go to quiet title,
[49:59.000 --> 50:04.000]  you want to go to the clerk and see if you can get the clerk to go to the judge and say,
[50:04.000 --> 50:08.000]  you know, these people file this trash in my records.
[50:08.000 --> 50:10.000]  And it's not valid.
[50:10.000 --> 50:15.000]  And ask the judge to make a determination that these records aren't valid.
[50:15.000 --> 50:17.000]  Okay.
[50:17.000 --> 50:21.000]  I'm looking for the procedures.
[50:21.000 --> 50:26.000]  There has to be a method for a clerk to go to the court and say,
[50:26.000 --> 50:40.000]  I have discovered in my records filings that are fraudulent or insufficient in accordance
[50:40.000 --> 50:46.000]  with the rules for filing documents in these records.
[50:46.000 --> 50:48.000]  There has to be a way to fix that.
[50:48.000 --> 50:52.000]  I have someone in California go to the clerk and ask him this question.
[50:52.000 --> 50:58.000]  They said, I have this property that would belong to my grandfather and he passed away.
[50:58.000 --> 51:08.000]  And I looked in the county record and I found a mechanics lien by a guy who has passed away.
[51:08.000 --> 51:16.000]  And this mechanics lien is for the cost of building a garage onto this property.
[51:16.000 --> 51:18.000]  But this property doesn't have a garage.
[51:18.000 --> 51:21.000]  It never has had a garage.
[51:21.000 --> 51:31.000]  So I have reason to believe that this particular mechanics lien was filed in the wrong property.
[51:31.000 --> 51:38.000]  But both of the individuals who would know the fact are dead.
[51:38.000 --> 51:54.000]  Do you have a method or a procedure to correct a record if it's obvious that it is fraudulent or in error?
[51:54.000 --> 52:01.000]  In Texas we have 5191, a government code.
[52:01.000 --> 52:06.000]  See if the clerk has a way to correct a record.
[52:06.000 --> 52:18.000]  You might go talk to the clerk and say, look, you have lost a lot of revenue because these banks have not did the filings they required to do.
[52:18.000 --> 52:27.000]  And the pseudonym, but for the most part, are not required to do these filings, not statutorily required to.
[52:27.000 --> 52:36.000]  Now, if they don't do the filings, they may not perfect their claim, but there's no statutory requirement to make filings.
[52:36.000 --> 52:52.000]  So we come to you and say, the bank filed this bogus document in the court record and it's bogus because they didn't do the prior filings necessary to give this one credence.
[52:52.000 --> 53:08.000]  So I'm going to ask you to go to the court and say, and show this to the court and say, these guys didn't file the documents in front of this to show a complete chain of ownership in order to give this one authority.
[53:08.000 --> 53:13.000]  So I'm going to ask you to rule that this one is void of no force in effect.
[53:13.000 --> 53:28.000]  Now, it's not taking away the bank, whoever the filers claim, they certainly have the option of coming back and putting in all of those necessary filings.
[53:28.000 --> 53:37.000]  That way you'll get these banks to come back and follow these documents they were supposed to pay you all those filing fees.
[53:37.000 --> 53:51.000]  Everything's political. If you can get the clerk on your side to look for a way to get the banks to have to do all these filings and the way to do that is to sting them.
[53:51.000 --> 53:55.000]  So you file this in the court and it's the garbage and get the court to rule it.
[53:55.000 --> 54:08.000]  If you go to the judge and ask the judge to rule that this document is fraudulent, he's going to say, you're just something that may try to get out of a mortgage and he's going to blow it off for that reason.
[54:08.000 --> 54:16.000]  But if you can get the clerk to go to the judge, the clerk is part of the good old boy network.
[54:16.000 --> 54:32.000]  He's more likely to do this to serve the best interest of the clerk than he is to do it for some prosaic turd who's trying to beat a bill.
[54:32.000 --> 54:37.000]  If you can get that, now you have them.
[54:37.000 --> 54:48.000]  This is res judicata. Already been adjudicated. Do take that to the court and petition for quiet title.
[54:48.000 --> 55:00.000]  And you go to the court and you say, I have this prior adjudication, which you don't have to say this, but the implication is you have no power to revisit.
[55:00.000 --> 55:08.000]  And this prior adjudication says that this document on which this foreclosure action was based is void.
[55:08.000 --> 55:11.000]  Therefore, the foreclosure is void.
[55:11.000 --> 55:14.000]  And you must rule that it is void.
[55:14.000 --> 55:18.000]  And now you got it.
[55:18.000 --> 55:20.000]  Wow. Okay.
[55:20.000 --> 55:26.000]  How about one last question here? How about wrongful foreclosures, Sue?
[55:26.000 --> 55:34.000]  I am working on those and in a wrongful for to go to wrongful foreclosure.
[55:34.000 --> 55:44.000]  I've put together a program I've been several months working on developing how to analyze the count the county records.
[55:44.000 --> 55:48.000]  I'm doing an analysis of the county records.
[55:48.000 --> 56:03.000]  And I've looked at these analyses that are out there and none of them so far have been quite satisfactory because they produce the analysis for the person who's requesting it.
[56:03.000 --> 56:09.000]  I don't want one produced for the person requesting it. I want one produced for the court.
[56:09.000 --> 56:19.000]  So I'm producing one that is a statement of facts, which takes all the documents and breaks them all apart into the component pieces.
[56:19.000 --> 56:30.000]  And then I go to a statement of factual accusation and I show how all of these different pieces fit together and what the problems with them are.
[56:30.000 --> 56:35.000]  And then you can take this output and drop it right into a lawsuit.
[56:35.000 --> 56:45.000]  Bam, just like it is. This is the kind of output I'm trying to get from some other vendors that we're using to do analysis I can't do.
[56:45.000 --> 56:52.000]  I don't want to hear a bunch of hoopla, yaya, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah about how this thing is wrong.
[56:52.000 --> 56:59.000]  Give me facts. Give me law that I can give to the judge. Give it to me in a way that I can drop it in a document.
[56:59.000 --> 57:06.000]  I'm in the process of producing those now and these things are powerful.
[57:06.000 --> 57:11.000]  The things we are finding is absolutely incredible.
[57:11.000 --> 57:17.000]  You hear all this stuff about how screwed up the county records are?
[57:17.000 --> 57:22.000]  They're right. They are.
[57:22.000 --> 57:27.000]  And we keep finding, in breaking apart piece by piece,
[57:27.000 --> 57:32.000]  you keep, I'm drilling down to finer and finer detail.
[57:32.000 --> 57:41.000]  You need to give the judge hard facts that he can wrap his head around and the best facts to give him are facts from the county record.
[57:41.000 --> 57:45.000]  These are incontrovertible.
[57:45.000 --> 57:55.000]  The statement of facts, we ask the judge to take judicial notice of all of these facts.
[57:55.000 --> 58:00.000]  They can't be incontroverted. And then we go stitch the facts together.
[58:00.000 --> 58:05.000]  We're putting together a really powerful piece. I think we're closing in on it.
[58:05.000 --> 58:10.000]  Okay. Do you have any more questions? Did I answer everything for you?
[58:10.000 --> 58:13.000]  You know, I probably need to do some more thinking and get back with you.
[58:13.000 --> 58:17.000]  I probably have more questions, but thank you for your time.
[58:17.000 --> 58:21.000]  Okay. Send me an email. I do a Wednesday night show.
[58:21.000 --> 58:25.000]  Give you the specifics on it. It's a college show. It's not on the radio.
[58:25.000 --> 58:27.000]  Okay. Good. Thank you.
[58:27.000 --> 58:30.000]  Thank you. When we come back, we're going to go to Rick in California.
[58:30.000 --> 58:33.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig,
[58:33.000 --> 58:39.000]  Rule of Law Radio. Our call in number is 512-646-1984.
[58:39.000 --> 58:44.000]  Give us a call. We've got one more hour. We'll be right back.
[58:44.000 --> 58:46.000]  We'll be back.
[59:14.000 --> 59:18.000]  The real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:18.000 --> 59:22.000]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:22.000 --> 59:28.000]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:28.000 --> 59:33.000]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:33.000 --> 59:39.000]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free
[59:39.000 --> 59:44.000]  at 1-888-551-0102
[59:44.000 --> 59:48.000]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:48.000 --> 59:51.000]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:53.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:00:04.000 --> 01:00:08.000]  Eating grilled food in too much red meat raises your cancer risk,
[01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:12.000]  but there's a way your barbecue can actually help you prevent cancer.
[01:00:12.000 --> 01:00:15.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll give you some safer grilling tips
[01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:39.000]  to make your cookouts tasty and healthy next.
[01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:52.000]  A slab of juicy meat, a flaming fire, the smell of sizzling fat,
[01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  barbecues are one of the joys of summer.
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:00:57.000]  Sadly, they also raise your cancer risk,
[01:00:57.000 --> 01:01:01.000]  but a few simple changes at a cookout can help prevent cancer.
[01:01:01.000 --> 01:01:03.000]  First, beware of burn.
[01:01:03.000 --> 01:01:07.000]  Charring beef creates HCA's and other cancer-causing agents.
[01:01:07.000 --> 01:01:12.000]  Also, marinate your beef with vinegar or lemon juice to add flavor and avoid charring.
[01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:17.000]  Brush veggies with olive oil and choose onions, mushrooms, asparagus, and zucchini
[01:01:17.000 --> 01:01:20.000]  that pack cancer-fighting phytochemicals.
[01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  And finally, add some fish to your repertoire.
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:25.000]  It'll keep your stomach and your heart happy.
[01:01:25.000 --> 01:01:37.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:40.000]  Could the end be near for the shopping mall?
[01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:44.000]  Dr. Catherine Albrecht, back to tell you how a major shift in attacks code
[01:01:44.000 --> 01:01:47.000]  is creating a shipping revolution for Amazon.com.
[01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:50.000]  And that could change the way we shop.
[01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:56.000]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:56.000 --> 01:02:01.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:02:01.000 --> 01:02:03.000]  So protect your rights.
[01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:06.000]  Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:09.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:12.000]  The message is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:16.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:20.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:24.000]  Retailers may have shopped themselves in the foot with their biggest competitor, Amazon.
[01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:28.000]  See, they lobbied state lawmakers to force Amazon to collect sales tax
[01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:31.000]  so the online giant couldn't undercut prices.
[01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:34.000]  But now that Amazon's charging sales tax in many states,
[01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:38.000]  it figures it may as well open shipping centers in those states too.
[01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:43.000]  And that means Amazon could soon deliver goods to customers the same day they're purchased.
[01:02:43.000 --> 01:02:47.000]  This radical move could put brick-and-mortar retailers out of business.
[01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:51.000]  Who will drive to the store if they can have purchases on their doorstep within hours?
[01:02:51.000 --> 01:02:56.000]  Lesson to retailers? Be careful what you wish for. This plan backfired.
[01:02:56.000 --> 01:03:03.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:03:03.000 --> 01:03:08.000]  Yeah!
[01:03:08.000 --> 01:03:11.000]  Store it for everyone to see, yeah.
[01:03:11.000 --> 01:03:15.000]  But now we're not going to get that to the speed.
[01:03:15.000 --> 01:03:19.000]  Yeah, store it.
[01:03:19.000 --> 01:03:21.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:23.000]  We're going to tell them students they're crazy.
[01:03:23.000 --> 01:03:25.000]  We'll use our radio.
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:29.000]  We're going to Rick in California.
[01:03:29.000 --> 01:03:32.000]  Hello, Rick.
[01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  Hi, how are you guys doing today?
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:39.000]  We're doing good. Where have you been?
[01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:41.000]  Well, I've been missing in action.
[01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:46.000]  I've been actually, I've had the misfortune of going and renting houses
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:52.000]  and find out later on that there, you know, the people weren't paying them.
[01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:57.000]  And so, you know, I took it to total paying for some last month on different homes.
[01:03:57.000 --> 01:04:02.000]  So, but I've been studying law, as always, of course, just reading up,
[01:04:02.000 --> 01:04:07.000]  going over the criminal code of procedures and, you know, the appellate division
[01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:09.000]  and all that stuff, the court rules.
[01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  But it just seems like the more you read, the more you really realize that there's a lot more to learn
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  and even then they just don't play by the rules.
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  Yeah, we're very familiar with that part.
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:27.000]  Are you still working traffic?
[01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:29.000]  Yes, yes.
[01:04:29.000 --> 01:04:35.000]  It's insane because there's a, it's funny that the courts are getting more blatant now.
[01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  There's a case called People vs. Sava, which clearly states that the legislature did not intend
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:45.000]  for infractions to be criminal in the state of California.
[01:04:45.000 --> 01:04:51.000]  And that's why you don't have a trial by jury nor do you get the right to counsel if it's not a crime.
[01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  But they're using criminal procedures and, you know, it's pretty crazy.
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:04.000]  Basically, I have a case right now, as a matter of fact, where I got charged with driving with a suspended license.
[01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:10.000]  And I found out that in the state of California, what they do is they'll charge it as a misdemeanor,
[01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:15.000]  but the law says it's an infraction and can only be charged as a misdemeanor
[01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:19.000]  if the defendant, you know, elects for the prosecutor to do so.
[01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:22.000]  But nobody ever elects for that.
[01:05:22.000 --> 01:05:28.000]  And so the reason why I found out they do that is so they can tow the car, basically steal it and send it back.
[01:05:28.000 --> 01:05:31.000]  That's basically it.
[01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  Have you looked at grand juries?
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:39.000]  No, I have not. I have not actually.
[01:05:39.000 --> 01:05:41.000]  I still have not.
[01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:46.000]  I'm not a fun to be had there and also civil litigation.
[01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  You know, I've been looking into the administrative procedures to see how you can get them in, you know,
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  file complaints against them there first and then from there go to federal court.
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:03.000]  That's actually the angle I was looking at right now.
[01:06:03.000 --> 01:06:08.000]  California has a really good grand jury.
[01:06:08.000 --> 01:06:13.000]  And grand jury terrifies these guys.
[01:06:13.000 --> 01:06:21.000]  You know, you've heard this stuff that any prosecutor worth his salt can get a ham sandwich indicted.
[01:06:21.000 --> 01:06:31.000]  Well, the problem that they have is keeping the ham sandwich from being indicted.
[01:06:31.000 --> 01:06:36.000]  And when you start filing against public officials,
[01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:44.000]  that's when you one of the things you create is protection for yourself.
[01:06:44.000 --> 01:06:51.000]  Unless you get really crazy bunch of people, which I ran into in Cherokee County,
[01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:54.000]  but that worms turning as well.
[01:06:54.000 --> 01:07:00.000]  Now I'm filing against them with the Chief Justice of the Supreme.
[01:07:00.000 --> 01:07:05.000]  But generally when you start filing petitions with grand juries,
[01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:09.000]  the problem with the grand jury is, and this is what a prosecutor told me,
[01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:13.000]  you never know what they're going to do.
[01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:17.000]  And you, when filing, you don't care if you get an indictment or not.
[01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:19.000]  That's really not your purpose.
[01:07:19.000 --> 01:07:26.000]  Your purpose of getting these people to follow law, you should go down and start having a grand jury.
[01:07:26.000 --> 01:07:29.000]  It terrifies all of them.
[01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:35.000]  And that's what got my local sheriff to tell all of his deputies,
[01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:41.000]  you're not to stop him, you're not to cite him, whatever you do, don't put that S.O.B in my jail.
[01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:45.000]  They don't, that'll keep them from coming after you.
[01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  But we are looking at, in this legislative session,
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:08:01.000]  lobbying for legislation that would order the grand jury to meet at least once a month
[01:08:01.000 --> 01:08:05.000]  for the purpose of hearing complaints by private citizens.
[01:08:05.000 --> 01:08:07.000]  No.
[01:08:07.000 --> 01:08:11.000]  Now this is really, really simple.
[01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:16.000]  You know, you got all these legislators, especially the new ones, they need something to do,
[01:08:16.000 --> 01:08:22.000]  and you take them this and say, look, you know, this is not going to cost you any money.
[01:08:22.000 --> 01:08:27.000]  Legislature meets him, I mean, the grand jury meets anyway.
[01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:37.000]  And you already have all the facilities and you're not in any way interfering with the authority of the grand jury.
[01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:40.000]  You're just asking them to meet to hear complaints by public officials.
[01:08:40.000 --> 01:08:43.000]  And it's not because we want anybody indicted.
[01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:46.000]  Most of the time, nobody's going to show up.
[01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  We don't care.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:55.000]  The reason we do this is so that this police officer stayed out drinking too late last night with his buddies.
[01:08:55.000 --> 01:08:56.000]  He gets home late.
[01:08:56.000 --> 01:08:59.000]  Mama's really upset at him.
[01:08:59.000 --> 01:09:00.000]  He wakes up with a hangover.
[01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:01.000]  He's late for work.
[01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:02.000]  The boss is on his case.
[01:09:02.000 --> 01:09:04.000]  He is not having a good day.
[01:09:04.000 --> 01:09:07.000]  And then he pulls over Rick.
[01:09:07.000 --> 01:09:11.000]  And Rick is his usual obnoxious and demanding self.
[01:09:11.000 --> 01:09:17.000]  And the officer gets the idea that he's going to do one of these attitude arrests.
[01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:27.000]  But then again, what if that no good rotten Rick takes the complaint against me down to the grand jury on this,
[01:09:27.000 --> 01:09:31.000]  hear complaints from Citizens Day?
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:39.000]  What is the grand jury of his peers going to think about what I'm about to do?
[01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:44.000]  That's why we need this.
[01:09:44.000 --> 01:09:49.000]  Or at least that's the song and dance we give to legislators.
[01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:52.000]  That's not really why we want this.
[01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:59.000]  We want this so we can whine their clocks.
[01:09:59.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  In order, if we're going to take this system back, we're not going to do it with a bulldozer.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:08.000]  They got a bigger bulldozer.
[01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:11.000]  We're going to do it by Bushwack.
[01:10:11.000 --> 01:10:15.000]  This is one we think we can get the legislators to pass.
[01:10:15.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  We're asking for a lot more.
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  But most of what we're asking for, we don't care if we get or not.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  We need something for them to say no to us with.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:30.000]  So we're giving them stuff to say no about.
[01:10:30.000 --> 01:10:36.000]  And we're constructing this as a bone they can throw us.
[01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:40.000]  And if we have a new congressman, you know, he's going to want to do something.
[01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:43.000]  And this is something that sounds good.
[01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:48.000]  And, you know, he gets a law passed that makes him look good.
[01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:50.000]  We get that law passed.
[01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  I have just sent 38 criminal complaints to the Chief Justice of the Supreme here in Texas.
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  Under the guise of affidavits in support of a complaint against the head administrative judge at the judicial district over a disqualification issue.
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:20.000]  And I would take odds that the Chief Justice, when he looks at those verified criminal affidavits,
[01:11:20.000 --> 01:11:30.000]  is going to forget what Article 2.09 code of criminal procedure says, who are magistrates.
[01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:35.000]  First one, justices of the Supreme Court.
[01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:42.000]  But he's going to say like head criminal district judge in Travis County said, oh, well, that's Calvin.
[01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:48.000]  These are criminal complaints and district judges in Travis County don't take criminal complaints.
[01:11:48.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  That's all right, Your Honor.
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  I'm not here to invoke your duty as a district judge.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:57.000]  I'm here to invoke your duty as a magistrate.
[01:11:57.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  And that's a duty from which you may not shield yourself.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:09.000]  Neither made the Chief Justice of the Supreme shield himself.
[01:12:09.000 --> 01:12:12.000]  It's all politics, Rick.
[01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:18.000]  I'm sure you can start screwing up the people that even made this happen.
[01:12:18.000 --> 01:12:24.000]  This is how we're going to win, you know, and then all this time we've been kind of evolving the process.
[01:12:24.000 --> 01:12:29.000]  And it's become clear you will not win your case because you have the law of the facts on your side.
[01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:32.000]  To think so is naive.
[01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:36.000]  You'll win your case if you get the politics on your side.
[01:12:36.000 --> 01:12:40.000]  You need the law on the facts, but that's not going to win the case.
[01:12:40.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  Politics is.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:49.000]  So we have been, you know, I've been for quite a while looking for where is the politics?
[01:12:49.000 --> 01:12:54.000]  Where is the pressure? Where does the judge live?
[01:12:54.000 --> 01:12:57.000]  Where does the prosecutor live? I'm not talking about his home address.
[01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:02.000]  I'm talking about the context of where he exists.
[01:13:02.000 --> 01:13:05.000]  What pressures are on him?
[01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:09.000]  What pressures are on the prosecutor and the police officers?
[01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:13.000]  What are the police officers most afraid of?
[01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:20.000]  Where do they feel they're treated with the greatest injustice?
[01:13:20.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  That's exactly where I want to push them.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:33.000]  Who are they most afraid of? That's the one I want to get P.O.ed at them.
[01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  And we're getting this down.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  If we do this right, it won't take a lot of people to get things changed.
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:46.000]  You're the right one.
[01:13:46.000 --> 01:13:59.000]  You're the right one.
[01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  You can do the administrative procedures, but it's really technical.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  And heck, that is great because you want to go after them in places where they're not accustomed to having to deal with you.
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:29.000]  The problem ahead with you, Rick, is the problem ahead with me is they have people coming in there every day who are essentially in exactly the same position.
[01:14:29.000 --> 01:14:35.000]  They have no experience dealing with these guys, and they don't know anything about the law.
[01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:44.000]  They act pretty much the same way everybody else does, have the same reactions and responses.
[01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  But then they get Rick in there, and he's done his homework, and they try to create a confrontation with him, and it doesn't work.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:14:58.000]  He has other tools that he can use.
[01:14:58.000 --> 01:15:07.000]  He has other ways of reacting and responding, and these guys have no way of dealing with that.
[01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:15.000]  This is how we'll get things changed, but everybody doesn't have to be knowledgeable.
[01:15:15.000 --> 01:15:17.000]  Now, that's not going to happen.
[01:15:17.000 --> 01:15:23.000]  We're not going to get everybody to have the kind of time and dedication that you have.
[01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:26.000]  You're a rare breed.
[01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  I've been doing this show for five years now, and I've come across three or four like you in all this time.
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:38.000]  But that's enough.
[01:15:38.000 --> 01:15:45.000]  You can create so much difficulty for them if you do it right.
[01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:55.000]  If that official, he don't care about the law, he don't care about justice, he cares about his paycheck next week.
[01:15:55.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  And if it looks like you're going to cost him his paycheck next week, now you got his attention.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:13.000]  It's pretty funny that in my case right now, there's an officer, not mind you, I'm charged with a misdemeanor, allegedly,
[01:16:13.000 --> 01:16:18.000]  and I just finished filing a motion to dismiss and a probable cause hearing motion,
[01:16:18.000 --> 01:16:24.000]  because I want to know by what authority the officer was able to amend the alleged complaint.
[01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:30.000]  So they're going to have some kind of issues there with an officer practicing law,
[01:16:30.000 --> 01:16:36.000]  because that's a misdemeanor in itself, and so I'm going to try to do that.
[01:16:36.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  This is your man after all in the heart.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:41.000]  Hang on, Rick.
[01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  This is Randy Caldwell, Steve, and Betty Craig.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:46.000]  We have our radio.
[01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  I call it number 5226461984.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:17:01.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:01.000 --> 01:17:07.000]  At Capital Coin in Berlin, our mission is to be your preferred shopping destination by delivering excellent customer service
[01:17:07.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  and outstanding value at an affordable price.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:14.000]  Capital Coin features a great selection of high quality coins and precious metals.
[01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:17.000]  In addition to providing the best prices in the nation,
[01:17:17.000 --> 01:17:21.000]  we want to bring you the best shopping experience both in-store and online.
[01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:25.000]  In addition to coins and bullion, we carry popular young Jeopardy products,
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:28.000]  such as Beyond Tangy Tangerine and Pollen Roast.
[01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  We offer freeze-dried, storable foods by Augustin Farms, Bergy Water Products,
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:35.000]  ammunition at 10% above wholesale, and more.
[01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:40.000]  You can lock in a spot price with our Silverpool, and we set up Metals IRA accounts.
[01:17:40.000 --> 01:17:44.000]  Call us at 512-646-440 for more details.
[01:17:44.000 --> 01:17:49.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about half a mile south of Amsterdam.
[01:17:49.000 --> 01:17:53.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10-6, Saturdays, 10-2.
[01:17:53.000 --> 01:18:22.000]  Visit us at capitalcoinandbullion.com or call 512-646-440.
[01:18:23.000 --> 01:18:29.000]  Ain't I a sight compared to what I used to be?
[01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:34.000]  Calcium, magnesium, selenium, and zinc.
[01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:40.000]  Take a moment now and think if you have a little brain.
[01:18:40.000 --> 01:18:46.000]  Every day will bring the life that you've been looking for.
[01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  Beyond Tangy Tangerine is available at Brave New Books, located at 1904 Guadeloupe Street.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:18:56.000]  The bookstore also carries the works of Dr. Joel Wallach,
[01:18:56.000 --> 01:19:03.000]  founder of Young Jeopardy, and creator of Beyond Tangy Tangerine.
[01:19:03.000 --> 01:19:26.000]  Oh, come on.
[01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:37.000]  If I can't get everything I want, I'll get a ranger.
[01:19:37.000 --> 01:19:48.000]  If I can't get everything I need, I'll never get a ranger.
[01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:57.000]  If I can't get everything I need, I'll never get a ranger.
[01:19:57.000 --> 01:19:58.000]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:01.000]  Randy Calton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, and we're on radio,
[01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:04.000]  and we're talking to Rick in California.
[01:20:04.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  Okay, Rick, kind of bring us up on speed on what you're doing these days.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:13.000]  We've lost track of you for a while.
[01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  Well, basically, I'm just immersing myself in law.
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:24.000]  I mean, if you could see where I'm sitting at right now, to my left is, I mean,
[01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  at least 100 pages about demurred searches and seizures,
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  and then to my right is how to suppress evidence through evil searches and seizures as well.
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:39.000]  Basically, just reading and reading and reading because I'm trying to do it in a way where,
[01:20:39.000 --> 01:20:44.000]  kind of like attorneys do it, but I've been realizing that attorneys don't make arguments
[01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:47.000]  that need to be made for political reasons.
[01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:54.000]  So what you just said earlier made a lot of sense as to why you do it the way you do it.
[01:20:54.000 --> 01:21:01.000]  So are you, quite a while back, you were looking at going to school for law.
[01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:04.000]  Are you still doing that?
[01:21:04.000 --> 01:21:06.000]  Well, I'm actually going to start school.
[01:21:06.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  I'm going to do a paralegal first so I can, you know, learn how to just things better,
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:14.000]  like on the next, the next to Swiss law.
[01:21:14.000 --> 01:21:16.000]  Even though I'm pretty much learning as I go.
[01:21:16.000 --> 01:21:19.000]  So, but, you know, school is going to help me with that.
[01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:23.000]  But I keep telling me to become an attorney, but, you know,
[01:21:23.000 --> 01:21:29.000]  I've just seen so many attorneys get stomped on by the bar for nothing really.
[01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:34.000]  And I've had other attorneys that I've been talking to recently that they've told me
[01:21:34.000 --> 01:21:37.000]  that when they want to help friends or family members,
[01:21:37.000 --> 01:21:42.000]  they literally have to give out crappy deals to a lot of people
[01:21:42.000 --> 01:21:46.000]  so that when they really defend somebody they want to defend the judge knows,
[01:21:46.000 --> 01:21:49.000]  well, that's okay because it's only once in a while kind of thing.
[01:21:49.000 --> 01:21:53.000]  So I was really upset when I heard that because I said, you know, I knew it was crooked,
[01:21:53.000 --> 01:21:57.000]  but that's just, you know, pretty sad.
[01:21:57.000 --> 01:21:59.000]  Okay.
[01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:01.000]  Yeah, I'm going to...
[01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:08.000]  This is the way it is. Lawyers, they have to kiss judges behind,
[01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:13.000]  so the judges will end their careers.
[01:22:13.000 --> 01:22:15.000]  Give me a call tomorrow.
[01:22:15.000 --> 01:22:21.000]  There's something I'd like to talk to you about that might make a lot of this easier.
[01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:24.000]  I've been doing a lot of work myself.
[01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:26.000]  Okay.
[01:22:26.000 --> 01:22:32.000]  Okay, do you have any particular questions you want to ask or comments you want to make?
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:37.000]  Oh, yes. I wanted to ask you guys if...
[01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:39.000]  I guess the state doesn't matter.
[01:22:39.000 --> 01:22:47.000]  If I'm in any state, where would I go to start figuring out as far as how to,
[01:22:47.000 --> 01:22:51.000]  when a grand jury convenes, how to make a proper complaint?
[01:22:51.000 --> 01:22:56.000]  Well, that could be like a regular one in the training make, only just put in the officer's name.
[01:22:56.000 --> 01:23:04.000]  Yeah, yeah, just a criminal complaint with an affidavit in support.
[01:23:04.000 --> 01:23:11.000]  You know, just write up something for someone in the eighth grade.
[01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:13.000]  Okay.
[01:23:13.000 --> 01:23:19.000]  Something really simple, and this is not denigrating the grand jury members.
[01:23:19.000 --> 01:23:25.000]  It's just that these people aren't lawyers and legal professionals,
[01:23:25.000 --> 01:23:32.000]  and you need to craft something that someone without a lot of basic knowledge
[01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  in what you're talking about can wrap their head around.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:44.000]  If you'll go to jurisprudence.com and look at this Cherokee County complaint.
[01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:54.000]  This is a 50-page complaint, but it was written for an eighth grader, essentially.
[01:23:54.000 --> 01:24:01.000]  And there's a lot of work in it, and it was specifically crafted the way it was
[01:24:01.000 --> 01:24:10.000]  so that it would make one accusation that led directly to the next accusation that led to the next.
[01:24:10.000 --> 01:24:17.000]  So someone could read it, and it would intuitively, one thing would follow from another.
[01:24:17.000 --> 01:24:25.000]  So somebody with no knowledge of what was going on could read it, and it'll make sense to them.
[01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:28.000]  I do not use pronouns.
[01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:32.000]  I do not use acronyms.
[01:24:32.000 --> 01:24:41.000]  People use acronyms because they think instead of reading Faraday Collection Practices Act,
[01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:47.000]  it would be faster and more efficient to read FDCPA.
[01:24:47.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  That is absolute nonsense.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:24:54.000]  That is based on false premise.
[01:24:54.000 --> 01:24:59.000]  The premise being that we actually read the word.
[01:24:59.000 --> 01:25:11.000]  When you see Faraday Collection Practices Act, you recognize fair, just like you'd recognize a Honda or a Dodge.
[01:25:11.000 --> 01:25:13.000]  You take one look at it.
[01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:17.000]  That's how you look at a word and you think, that doesn't look right.
[01:25:17.000 --> 01:25:19.000]  That thing's not spelled right.
[01:25:19.000 --> 01:25:23.000]  I don't know why it's not spelled right, but it doesn't look right.
[01:25:23.000 --> 01:25:27.000]  That's because we recognize words.
[01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:36.000]  So when you get in a legal document, if someone has used an acronym, you get to the acronym unless you've seen it a hundred times.
[01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:47.000]  You see the acronym and you have to stop and say, okay, that means fair, debt, collections, practices, act.
[01:25:47.000 --> 01:25:52.000]  So it completely knocks you out of the thought process.
[01:25:52.000 --> 01:26:01.000]  If you're reading the document and you see Faraday Collection Practices Act, you'll recognize those like you would have Chevy and just bounce right over them.
[01:26:01.000 --> 01:26:04.000]  Never use acronyms.
[01:26:04.000 --> 01:26:11.000]  It confuses everybody and breaks the flow of your document.
[01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  Never use pronouns if there's any way you can avoid it.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:25.000]  Because the reader will read the pronoun, he, him, her, she.
[01:26:25.000 --> 01:26:31.000]  What specific entity does that actually refer to?
[01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:45.000]  The problem with he, if there are two entities mentioned in the document, you have to stop and make sure you're applying the pronoun to the right person or entity.
[01:26:45.000 --> 01:26:47.000]  It causes a pattern interruption.
[01:26:47.000 --> 01:26:50.000]  It interrupts the flow of the reader.
[01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:51.000]  Leave those out.
[01:26:51.000 --> 01:26:52.000]  Those are the first two things.
[01:26:52.000 --> 01:27:01.000]  The word that, we need that term in spoken English, but not in written.
[01:27:01.000 --> 01:27:06.000]  For the most part, that is a directing word.
[01:27:06.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  Brady, the press secretary for Reagan that got shot.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:22.000]  He read an article in Reader's Digest that when one of his attachés would give him an article, the first thing he'd do is go through it and take out the word that and give it back to him to fix it.
[01:27:22.000 --> 01:27:32.000]  If you take it most of the time, if you just take that word out of the written document, the person reading it will never notice that it's not there.
[01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:37.000]  The mind will put it right back and just keep going.
[01:27:37.000 --> 01:27:41.000]  And that's what I call a conversational ellipsis.
[01:27:41.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  Ellipsis is something, part of a quotation that's left out.
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:28:03.000]  One of the things to do the document to make it really easy for someone to read and understand is to look for those strings of words that if you take them out, the reader won't even notice.
[01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  If you take something out that's part of a string, the mind will put it right back and that creates the experience of rapport.
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:32.000]  I don't know if all this makes sense, but in writing these documents, we need to really pay attention to how to keep the reader's attention and not so much attention, but flow of mind.
[01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:35.000]  So don't assume anything.
[01:28:35.000 --> 01:28:40.000]  Don't force your reader to figure something out.
[01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:49.000]  If you quote, if you reference a statute, put the statute right under it in quotations, shrink it, shrink in both the margins.
[01:28:49.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  The reader will see the quotation and know immediately it's a quotation.
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:29:05.000]  And if they are not sure what the statute I've referred to says, they'll be stuck.
[01:29:05.000 --> 01:29:07.000]  Mentally, they'll trip.
[01:29:07.000 --> 01:29:14.000]  But if I've quoted it right there, if they know exactly what it says, they'll just skip right over it and never miss a beat.
[01:29:14.000 --> 01:29:18.000]  But if they don't know what it says, they'll just keep going and read it.
[01:29:18.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  And I don't cause an internal middle interruption, so they'll lose the flow of thought.
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:33.000]  A few relatively simple rules will make a tremendous difference.
[01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:39.000]  No pronouns, no acronyms, no extra words.
[01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:46.000]  Hang on, Rick, I know I've kind of been lecturing, I didn't mean to, but this is a really fun topic for me.
[01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:50.000]  This is Randy Celtic, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig, we'll leave it on the radio.
[01:29:50.000 --> 01:30:00.000]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:30:00.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  A noble lie, Oklahoma City, 1995 will change forever the way you look at the true nature of terrorism.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  Based on the damage patting to the building, but the government sends impossible.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:15.000]  The grand jury did not want to hear anything I had to say.
[01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:23.000]  Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:23.000 --> 01:30:27.000]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:32.000]  Expose the cover up now at elobolive.com.
[01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:38.000]  The rule of law radio network is proud to present a due process of law seminar hosted by our own Eddie Craig.
[01:30:38.000 --> 01:30:43.000]  Eddie is a former Nacodotius Sheriff's deputy and for the past 21 years he's been studying the due process of law
[01:30:43.000 --> 01:30:49.000]  and now offers his knowledge to you at a seminar every Sunday from 2 o'clock to 5 o'clock at Brave New Books,
[01:30:49.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  located at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:30:52.000 --> 01:31:01.000]  Admission is $20, so please make plans to come by and sit with Eddie and learn for yourself what the true intent of law really is.
[01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:09.000]  At hempusa.org we offer chemical-free products to people around the world, detoxifying, self-healing while rebuilding the immune system.
[01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:15.000]  We urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product, micro plant powder.
[01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:24.000]  Our micro plant powder is rich in iodine, probiotics, zinc and silica to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:31:24.000 --> 01:31:29.000]  Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:31:29.000 --> 01:31:37.000]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org and remember all of our products are chemical-free and healthy to eat.
[01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:42.000]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere,
[01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:46.000]  and we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the US.
[01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:52.000]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608.
[01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:55.000]  That's 908-6912608.
[01:31:55.000 --> 01:32:00.000]  See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:10.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[01:32:10.000 --> 01:32:14.000]  Logos Radio Network
[01:32:14.000 --> 01:32:17.000]  Logos Radio Network
[01:32:17.000 --> 01:32:21.000]  Logos Radio Network
[01:32:21.000 --> 01:32:25.000]  Logos Radio Network
[01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:29.000]  Logos Radio Network
[01:32:29.000 --> 01:32:32.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Doug Stevens at Clayton, we're with our radio.
[01:32:32.000 --> 01:32:38.000]  Rick, I didn't mean to get off on that topic, but it's one of my favorite things to talk about.
[01:32:38.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  Back to you.
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:47.000]  Haven't heard from you in a long time. Have you had any really great adventures?
[01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:54.000]  Actually, I have. I had a buddy of mine who actually was charged with a DUI.
[01:32:54.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  And how they got this, I don't know, they basically just said he was under the influence.
[01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:09.000]  And they took him to jail. They took the blood. And so he filed the motions.
[01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:16.000]  And now I just came back from court today. I got a complaint that the DUI is gone and now it's reckless driving.
[01:33:16.000 --> 01:33:23.000]  So we're going to have fun with that because I don't know how they got there as well, but you know, anything, whatever they want.
[01:33:23.000 --> 01:33:34.000]  Yeah, but have you looked at preparing a relatively generic lawsuit against the officers?
[01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:43.000]  You know, that's where I was at with my stuff. But after all this stuff that happened, you know, with the situations that I got in,
[01:33:43.000 --> 01:33:51.000]  because, you know, people, I guess, just decided not to pay their homes or couldn't, you know, I kind of had all that stuff.
[01:33:51.000 --> 01:33:55.000]  And so now I'm back. I'm kind of back in the game to sort of speak.
[01:33:55.000 --> 01:34:01.000]  But, you know, the statute of limitations from what I keep reading has already run for the officers in my old cases,
[01:34:01.000 --> 01:34:06.000]  as well as for, you know, I guess the last ones I had gotten in.
[01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:11.000]  But for these officers, I still have, I think, a December to file a complaint for damages, or my case,
[01:34:11.000 --> 01:34:17.000]  where this officer's filing complaints and amending it and doing all this bizarre stuff that he's not even authorized to do.
[01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:21.000]  But no, I haven't answered your question.
[01:34:21.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  Well, I'm going to suggest that it's relatively easy to walk these guys down a garden path.
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:41.000]  You know, I'm working with foreclosure issues. And once you have the basic suit structured,
[01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:49.000]  it's a piece of cake. You just make minor adjustments. And lawsuits really make them crazy.
[01:34:49.000 --> 01:34:58.000]  You know, they file a criminal complaint against you and they jerk you around and make you come in and dance for them.
[01:34:58.000 --> 01:35:04.000]  When you file a civil action against them, it's the other way around.
[01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  And for them, that is a big deal. Because traffic laws is all about the money.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:16.000]  Yeah.
[01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:24.000]  If you put together a relative, they do the same things over and over. So you put together a generic lawsuit.
[01:35:24.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  And guy gets a ticket, it's going to cost him $300, $500. You sell him a lawsuit for $50 and it costs him $125 filing in the county court.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:41.000]  And it's going to cost the other side of fortune.
[01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:42.000]  Yeah.
[01:35:42.000 --> 01:35:43.000]  Yeah.
[01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:49.000]  And I also put that California is a community property state. So I won't just sue them.
[01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:51.000]  It'll be also their spouse as well.
[01:35:51.000 --> 01:36:00.000]  Their spouse. Oh, that's, we were just talking the other day. I suggested that someone not file in the civil court.
[01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  But I had another venue that they should file in and they said, what's that in the court of angry wife?
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:14.000]  That one works a lot. That's a lot better venue.
[01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:15.000]  Yeah.
[01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:21.000]  But talk to me after, have you looked at the foreclosures at all?
[01:36:21.000 --> 01:36:28.000]  I've read about it. I've looked some up, but not to the degree you have. I'm sure.
[01:36:28.000 --> 01:36:33.000]  Talk to me after the show. Talk to me tomorrow. I want to talk to you about that.
[01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:42.000]  A good place for you to use your legal knowledge in a way that's a lot more effective. It's very timely.
[01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:43.000]  Okay.
[01:36:43.000 --> 01:36:47.000]  And we are having great fun.
[01:36:47.000 --> 01:36:50.000]  Okay. I'll call back tomorrow.
[01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:59.000]  Okay. Well, if I don't hear from you, I'll get in touch with you, but give me a call. I do have something I want to present to you.
[01:36:59.000 --> 01:37:01.000]  Around, around what time?
[01:37:01.000 --> 01:37:13.000]  Oh, anytime. I will be here all day working on documents. Just don't call me before seven in the morning your time. That's five in the morning my time.
[01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:16.000]  I call this number though, right? The rule of law one?
[01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:26.000]  No, no, no. Call 512-430-4140.
[01:37:26.000 --> 01:37:27.000]  Okay.
[01:37:27.000 --> 01:37:40.000]  And that's the thing I want to ask you. The thing you were talking about the document, that actually sounds a lot like the MLP, no, the new six programming only on paper.
[01:37:40.000 --> 01:37:52.000]  It happens to sound like an LP. Well, I didn't get into the real in LP part.
[01:37:52.000 --> 01:38:05.000]  Yes, it is an LP, as a matter of fact, or kind of, it started out with the new linguistic programming and moved more into Ericksonian hypnosis.
[01:38:05.000 --> 01:38:13.000]  You know, the, the single most hypnotic thing that I've ever done is read.
[01:38:13.000 --> 01:38:14.000]  Yeah.
[01:38:14.000 --> 01:38:19.000]  The only thing more hypnotic than reading is writing.
[01:38:19.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  Hypnosis is not some weird thing that we do. All of the tools used in hypnosis we use on each other every day.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:32.000]  Yeah.
[01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:47.000]  If I want to trigger hypnosis in you, I'll just distract you. I'll tell you something I don't want you to pay close attention to and think about and then slam the door or drop a cup of coffee in your lap or something.
[01:38:47.000 --> 01:38:50.000]  Do a pattern interruption. Yeah.
[01:38:50.000 --> 01:39:01.000]  This is about, you know, that part about writing so that the an eighth grader can understand it.
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:11.000]  And it's just about moving the mind and understanding what interrupts people, what distracts people and what creates rapport with people.
[01:39:11.000 --> 01:39:20.000]  I don't talk about this much, but my primary study is not law, it's psychology, and I have no interest in abnormal psychology.
[01:39:20.000 --> 01:39:21.000]  Wow.
[01:39:21.000 --> 01:39:36.000]  My, you know, my interest is normal psychology. How do normal human beings do what they do and how can we help them do those things better?
[01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:37.000]  Yeah.
[01:39:37.000 --> 01:39:54.000]  Fashion. For me, that's the most fun, but everything I'm doing here, okay, this is stuff I normally don't go to, but most everything I do here is a metaphor.
[01:39:54.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  Yeah.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:40:00.000]  It is structured.
[01:40:00.000 --> 01:40:14.000]  I try to structure what I do to make it simpler for people to come to, to find more valuable conclusions.
[01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:22.000]  The thing to understand about psychology, about hypnosis, in hypnosis, nobody takes control of anybody.
[01:40:22.000 --> 01:40:29.000]  Hypnosis is only about helping someone focus on a particular issue.
[01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:51.000]  If, if I were doing a hypnotic interview and I tried to influence you to do something that violates your personal ethics or code, man, you would catch me in a heartbeat because you have all these internal protections.
[01:40:51.000 --> 01:41:01.000]  All I can do with hypnosis is help you focus. And I don't like the term hypnosis at all because it's not really accurate.
[01:41:01.000 --> 01:41:09.000]  It's not about hypnosis. All those tools we use in hypnosis, we use them all the time, every day.
[01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:18.000]  The problem is, most people don't know it. They don't know what these, what a pattern of interruption works.
[01:41:18.000 --> 01:41:19.000]  Yeah.
[01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:27.000]  And the police and these, the bad guys use that against us all the time.
[01:41:27.000 --> 01:41:39.000]  And one of the most telling things that ever come across is Milton Erickson. He was the most effective hypnotherapist who ever lived.
[01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:57.000]  He is, it's agreed by far everyone. What the one thing he said about hypnosis is the more you hypnotize someone, the more, the less they become a good subject.
[01:41:57.000 --> 01:42:02.000]  Because they begin to recognize all the patterns that you're using.
[01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:10.000]  And you know, we had a lot of people talking about the government coming up with all of these ways to manipulate us.
[01:42:10.000 --> 01:42:15.000]  That is the exact problem that they have.
[01:42:15.000 --> 01:42:38.000]  You may pull this crap on us once or twice. If, if, if I carefully gauge my responses so that I help you focus on a place you want to go to, that'll work very well.
[01:42:38.000 --> 01:42:53.000]  If I try to manipulate you in the slightest, you will catch me every time and it'll screw up what I'm trying, the tool I'm trying to use because you'll recognize that humans are incredibly sensitive.
[01:42:53.000 --> 01:43:01.000]  So all this nonsense about somebody being able to use hypnosis to control your mind, it's horse poop.
[01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:02.000]  Yeah.
[01:43:02.000 --> 01:43:07.000]  Hypnosis is nowhere near sophisticated enough for that.
[01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:16.000]  What I can do with it is help me to pay attention to when I'm screwing up.
[01:43:16.000 --> 01:43:24.000]  Because most of us, we, we trip people up that we're talking to and don't realize it.
[01:43:24.000 --> 01:43:27.000]  We lose rapport with them and have no clue.
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:31.000]  You know, they're sitting there thinking, what is this Turkey talking about?
[01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:35.000]  And we're just battling on and have no idea we've lost them.
[01:43:35.000 --> 01:43:42.000]  That's the only expert.
[01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:45.000]  Okay. Do you have anything else for us?
[01:43:45.000 --> 01:43:47.000]  That's it Rick.
[01:43:47.000 --> 01:43:49.000]  Okay. I will talk to you tomorrow.
[01:43:49.000 --> 01:43:52.000]  Thank you for calling. It's about time.
[01:43:52.000 --> 01:44:01.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, and we'll be right back.
[01:44:01.000 --> 01:44:07.000]  It's so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy.
[01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:10.000]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:44:10.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Oh well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:14.000]  Brave New Books?
[01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:21.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:44:21.000 --> 01:44:25.000]  They even stock Interfood, Burkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:44:25.000 --> 01:44:27.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:44:27.000 --> 01:44:32.000]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:36.000]  Oh, by UT? There's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:44:36.000 --> 01:44:43.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[01:44:43.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:52.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11am to 9pm and 1-6pm on Sundays.
[01:44:52.000 --> 01:44:59.000]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:28.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:28.000 --> 01:45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:43.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:52.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:52.000 --> 01:45:56.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[01:45:56.000 --> 01:46:14.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:33.000]  Okay, we are back. Randy Kelton, Debussy, Lady Crane, and Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:33.000 --> 01:46:39.000]  And before we go to David, I did have one thing I wanted to address.
[01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:44.000]  I've never talked about this before in the radio, but I make soap.
[01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:52.000]  It used to be in a business where I did industrial cleaning, and I designed all my own equipment and formulated all my own products.
[01:46:52.000 --> 01:47:02.000]  Well, I've been making some soaps for quite a while, and I have a number of people using them.
[01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:08.000]  I have had a number of people want me to produce these products to sell.
[01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:16.000]  But having been in that business for a long time, I kind of got burned out with it, especially from the commercial perspective.
[01:47:16.000 --> 01:47:22.000]  But I have been working on some personal soaps.
[01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:30.000]  So if anybody out there would be interested in looking at them, I am going to be putting together some samples
[01:47:30.000 --> 01:47:34.000]  and sending them out and have people trying them, telling them what to think about them.
[01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:38.000]  Now, the soap that I make is extremely simple.
[01:47:38.000 --> 01:47:46.000]  All it is two products, sodium trapolyphosphate and dodecholbenzol sulfonic acid, DDBSA.
[01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:51.000]  The best build of money can buy at Susie Bubly.
[01:47:51.000 --> 01:47:59.000]  They're both organic or essentially organic, as the DDBSA is developed from coconut oils.
[01:47:59.000 --> 01:48:11.000]  And sodium trapolyphosphate is not exactly organic, but there are organic products that are really horrible stuff.
[01:48:11.000 --> 01:48:16.000]  You can make a lot of soap just by burning a bunch of wood and taking the ashes.
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:23.000]  Take the ashes, throw them in a pot of water and boil them, and take out all the clinkers and boil it down to a thick liquid.
[01:48:23.000 --> 01:48:28.000]  If you stick your finger in that thing, it will take your fingernail right off.
[01:48:28.000 --> 01:48:32.000]  Purely organic, that stuff will eat you alive.
[01:48:32.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  And then you get it hot and pour a little oil in it and it will turn into soap. That's called lice soap.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:47.000]  So, sodium trapolyphosphate, I'm not sure exactly what the derivatives of it is, but it is the most expensive builder for soap money can buy.
[01:48:47.000 --> 01:48:54.000]  If you ever buy laundry soap and it's super-concentrate, that's sodium trapolyphosphate.
[01:48:54.000 --> 01:48:58.000]  There's a lot of phosphate being soaked in your trash in it that makes it cheaper.
[01:48:58.000 --> 01:49:04.000]  It's expensive, but it don't have bad habits.
[01:49:04.000 --> 01:49:10.000]  It don't eat the hide-off, it doesn't damage things, it doesn't leave films.
[01:49:10.000 --> 01:49:14.000]  It's got all these great properties, that's why it costs so much.
[01:49:14.000 --> 01:49:21.000]  And then I put a sudsy bubbly in it. No coloring agents, no agents in there to give it shelf life.
[01:49:21.000 --> 01:49:26.000]  Nothing in there to give it side effects.
[01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:29.000]  Everything's going to have side effects.
[01:49:29.000 --> 01:49:31.000]  And I have a number of people using them.
[01:49:31.000 --> 01:49:44.000]  Matter of fact, Chris is doing our call screen today. He uses our soap and the product itself was actually designed for industrial cleaning.
[01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:54.000]  And it does extremely well, but because it is the best product, I built this product for me to use myself.
[01:49:54.000 --> 01:49:58.000]  So I didn't care what it cost to produce it.
[01:49:58.000 --> 01:50:03.000]  I didn't care about shelf life, color, consistency, none of that stuff.
[01:50:03.000 --> 01:50:07.000]  I only cared about something that actually worked well.
[01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:09.000]  And I do have one that works well.
[01:50:09.000 --> 01:50:16.000]  If anybody would like to try it, I would like a number of people to try it and see what they think about it.
[01:50:16.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  I think you'll be pleased with it.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:25.000]  And if I get positive feedback, I'd like to make it available as a product to help support the network.
[01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  I don't care making money on it, making my money in other places,
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:39.000]  but if it would help support the network, I will certainly make it available and just one other minor thing.
[01:50:39.000 --> 01:50:47.000]  Most of, if you use a soap that burns your eyes, do not put it on your skin.
[01:50:47.000 --> 01:50:52.000]  Your skin doesn't have a lot of nerve cells caused to the surface, so it's not so sensitive.
[01:50:52.000 --> 01:50:54.000]  Your eyes do.
[01:50:54.000 --> 01:51:05.000]  If you put a soap in your eye and it burns your eyes, what that means is the soap is dissolving the oil out of your living tissue.
[01:51:05.000 --> 01:51:09.000]  That's precisely what Lysope will do.
[01:51:09.000 --> 01:51:13.000]  And Lysope is cheap as dirt, but it's really harsh.
[01:51:13.000 --> 01:51:21.000]  So if a soap burns your eyes, do not use it on your skin because every time you put it on your skin, it'll kill a layer of skin.
[01:51:21.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  And that skin will slough off and you'll have to produce more skin.
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:30.000]  The more skin you have to produce, the more likely you are to have anomalies.
[01:51:30.000 --> 01:51:34.000]  And they generally call that carcinomas.
[01:51:34.000 --> 01:51:37.000]  Use a soap that doesn't damage the skin that you have.
[01:51:37.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  Stay there a lot longer, you're less likely to develop cancer from it.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:43.000]  That's my personal opinion.
[01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:49.000]  But this soap absolutely will not attack the oils in the living tissue.
[01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:56.000]  You have to soap with it twice to get the first one will disrupt the oils, the second one flush it off.
[01:51:56.000 --> 01:52:00.000]  You will be amazed, your skin will shine.
[01:52:00.000 --> 01:52:04.000]  My skin, I'm 63 years old with my skin shines.
[01:52:04.000 --> 01:52:05.000]  No wrinkles.
[01:52:05.000 --> 01:52:09.000]  Anyway, if anybody's interested, send me an email.
[01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:17.000]  I'll send you some samples that I'd like to get feedback on what you like about it, what you don't like about it.
[01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:24.000]  So that I can make adjustments in how I put it together and get a good product that we can sell and help support the network.
[01:52:24.000 --> 01:52:26.000]  Okay, enough of that.
[01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:31.000]  Now I'm going to go to David in Texas.
[01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:32.000]  Hi, Randy.
[01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:33.000]  Hi, Eddie.
[01:52:33.000 --> 01:52:34.000]  Hello, David.
[01:52:34.000 --> 01:52:37.000]  I understand you have a warrant issue.
[01:52:37.000 --> 01:52:48.000]  Well, I have a warrant issue, but we've had so many callers since I called in, I wanted to add something to the third one back about the...
[01:52:48.000 --> 01:52:51.000]  I think he had MERS on his mortgage.
[01:52:51.000 --> 01:53:05.000]  There's been a class action suit filed in Georgia in the federal courts, the person's name and all others against MERS court.
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:22.000]  And my question is, anyone can join as it has MERS on the mortgage, but my question is, how do I incorporate that federal lawsuit against my foreclosure action that I'm fighting in Texas?
[01:53:22.000 --> 01:53:27.000]  Okay, David, do you have MERS in your lawsuit?
[01:53:27.000 --> 01:53:28.000]  Yes.
[01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:29.000]  I'm sorry.
[01:53:29.000 --> 01:53:31.000]  MERS on your deed of trust?
[01:53:31.000 --> 01:53:32.000]  Yes.
[01:53:32.000 --> 01:53:33.000]  Am I in chamber?
[01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:34.000]  Go ahead.
[01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:39.000]  Did the lender sign the deed of trust?
[01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:41.000]  No.
[01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:47.000]  Then MERS was not appointed as a agent for the lender?
[01:53:47.000 --> 01:54:02.000]  Right, I heard that earlier, but my question to you is, how do I incorporate that federal lawsuit joining as a party that...
[01:54:02.000 --> 01:54:07.000]  You can't bring that lawsuit into your state action.
[01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:08.000]  I cannot.
[01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:14.000]  I have to go to the federal court to see if it's a federal credit collection lawsuit or it is.
[01:54:14.000 --> 01:54:17.000]  Okay, FDCPA?
[01:54:17.000 --> 01:54:18.000]  Uh-huh.
[01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:21.000]  Okay, I've got a lot of those.
[01:54:21.000 --> 01:54:34.000]  I haven't seen that suit, but my experience with class actions and jointers suits is that they're scams.
[01:54:34.000 --> 01:54:50.000]  The last one, I talked to one couple of the lawyers who were actually working suit, and one of them, when I talked to him, I knew he was with this particular jointers suit.
[01:54:50.000 --> 01:54:52.000]  And I pretended like I didn't.
[01:54:52.000 --> 01:55:09.000]  And I told him I had read this suit, and it's a 385-page suit, and all but 50 pages was the 1,500 defendants and 800 plaintiffs.
[01:55:09.000 --> 01:55:15.000]  And I read the suit, and it looks like they just drug it off the internet.
[01:55:15.000 --> 01:55:25.000]  So once I read the suit, it looked like this law firm was making their money by collecting retainers from all of these people joining the lawsuit.
[01:55:25.000 --> 01:55:26.000]  They didn't get darned.
[01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:29.000]  They adjudicated the suit or not.
[01:55:29.000 --> 01:55:39.000]  They'd made $3,400 million just from the people paying them $3,000 a piece to become a part of the suit.
[01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:42.000]  $3,000 as a jointer?
[01:55:42.000 --> 01:55:44.000]  Yeah, it was a jointer.
[01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:48.000]  And it looked like it was a scam because I read it.
[01:55:48.000 --> 01:55:57.000]  And, you know, we have, with remedies in real estate, on the order of 600 federal lawsuits out there.
[01:55:57.000 --> 01:56:05.000]  And all of them get a Rule 12 motion to dismiss fair state claim, which can be had when I read this jointer suit.
[01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:13.000]  It was just a bunch of worthless accusations with no details or facts in support.
[01:56:13.000 --> 01:56:17.000]  This is going to get a Rule 12 motion to dismiss and judge is going to grant it.
[01:56:17.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  Okay.
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:23.000]  Okay, you've answered my question and I need to read the suit before I do anything.
[01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:25.000]  Absolutely.
[01:56:25.000 --> 01:56:28.000]  It's a jointer, a class action.
[01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:36.000]  It's a good chance that the lawyers are just using that suit to collect money from the plaintiffs and they don't care if they win or not.
[01:56:36.000 --> 01:56:37.000]  Okay.
[01:56:37.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  And so I'd have to drop my state, Texas.
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:43.000]  I'd have to end the...
[01:56:43.000 --> 01:56:46.000]  No, no, you would not have to drop your state suit.
[01:56:46.000 --> 01:56:48.000]  The federal suit is different.
[01:56:48.000 --> 01:57:03.000]  What might happen if you file a federal suit is the defendants may remove the state action to the Fed, but that's about it.
[01:57:03.000 --> 01:57:04.000]  It wouldn't hurt you.
[01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:05.000]  I'll say it then.
[01:57:05.000 --> 01:57:07.000]  Okay, here's the other thing.
[01:57:07.000 --> 01:57:10.000]  And this is a timing thing.
[01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:15.000]  I have found out and I can't prove it, but I believe you and I together...
[01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  I know that he's a good researcher.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  Some good researcher can prove where this is.
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  And what I tend to do when the time is right, the FGIC has a rule that if a foreclosure stays in the courts from the day it's filed, 24 months or more,
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:44.000]  that they have a rule that they kick the bond that, let's say we have a $100,000 note and it runs 24 months.
[01:57:44.000 --> 01:57:49.000]  The next day, they kick that seven and a half times.
[01:57:49.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  So it'll be $750,000 bond that they're having the bank has to...
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:02.000]  Okay, you're...
[01:58:02.000 --> 01:58:03.000]  Yeah, I'm losing.
[01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:04.000]  You're kind of breaking up.
[01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:05.000]  I'm sorry, David.
[01:58:05.000 --> 01:58:07.000]  We are out of time.
[01:58:07.000 --> 01:58:09.000]  This is Randy Kelton.
[01:58:09.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  Deborah Stevens.
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:11.000]  Eddie Craig.
[01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:12.000]  The Real Law Radio.
[01:58:12.000 --> 01:58:16.000]  This is the end of our four hour info marathon.
[01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:20.000]  We will be back Monday with Eddie and Deborah on the traffic show.
[01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:26.000]  And I will be back with Deborah and Eddie on Thursday and me and Eddie will be back on Friday.
[01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:28.000]  Thank you all for listening.
[01:58:28.000 --> 01:58:31.000]  We appreciate your being there.
[01:58:31.000 --> 01:58:34.000]  And we hope you will help us support the network.
[01:58:34.000 --> 01:58:36.000]  We've been digging deep in our own pockets.
[01:58:36.000 --> 01:58:37.000]  Keep it going.
[01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:39.000]  And we can surely use some help.
[01:58:39.000 --> 01:58:43.000]  And especially, Randy's beer font.
[01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:47.000]  Randy, move on the radio.
[01:58:47.000 --> 01:58:50.000]  See you Monday.
[01:59:17.000 --> 01:59:21.000]  Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:21.000 --> 01:59:23.000]  This translation is highly accurate.
[01:59:23.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  And it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:33.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:33.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:50.000]  That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:50.000 --> 02:00:12.000]  Looking for some truth? You found it. LogosRadioNetwork.com.