[00:00.000 --> 00:07.000]  Would you spend the entire day watching store surveillance videos if you didn't have to?
[00:07.000 --> 00:11.000]  I didn't think so, but some people apparently would and they'll even pay for the privilege.
[00:11.000 --> 00:16.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be right back to tell you about video voyeurs.
[00:16.000 --> 00:22.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[00:22.000 --> 00:27.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[00:27.000 --> 00:32.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[00:32.000 --> 00:38.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[00:38.000 --> 00:45.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[00:45.000 --> 00:51.000]  Imagine sitting in the corner of a store watching people buy the same products day after boring day.
[00:51.000 --> 00:57.000]  That's the life of the average security camera, yawn. But a British company called Internet Eyes
[00:57.000 --> 01:02.000]  gets people to pay to watch these video streams. They pay around 20 bucks, then members log on
[01:02.000 --> 01:09.000]  to watch UK stores and streets for criminal activity, hoping to win a monthly prize for being the most eagle-eyed.
[01:09.000 --> 01:16.000]  The plan is revolting, but it really went sour when members started posting YouTube videos of the unsuspecting shoppers.
[01:16.000 --> 01:21.000]  It's what you'd expect from the sort of person who enjoys watching surveillance cameras in the first place.
[01:21.000 --> 01:23.000]  Some people really need to get a life.
[01:23.000 --> 01:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31.000 --> 01:39.000]  We all like a nice fitting outfit that flatters the figure, but would you strip Bucknaked in front of total strangers to get that perfect look?
[01:39.000 --> 01:45.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment with the facts on a freaky, futuristic fitting room.
[01:45.000 --> 01:51.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:51.000 --> 01:56.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:56.000 --> 02:01.000]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[02:01.000 --> 02:07.000]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[02:07.000 --> 02:14.000]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. Start over with StartPage.
[02:14.000 --> 02:22.000]  You know that nakedizing X-ray machine at the airport, the one that strips you nude so TSA agents can scrutinize you in your birthday suit?
[02:22.000 --> 02:24.000]  Talk about an invasion of privacy.
[02:24.000 --> 02:32.000]  Well, soon you could have that same humiliating experience voluntarily at your local mall if a company called Unique Solutions has its way.
[02:32.000 --> 02:38.000]  The company is licensed backscatter X-ray machines for use in clothing store fitting rooms.
[02:38.000 --> 02:45.000]  The idea is to give staff a thorough gander at your contours to help them select the perfect outfit for your size and shape.
[02:45.000 --> 02:51.000]  They've already installed the machines at the nation's largest mall, the King of Prussia Mall, outside of Philadelphia.
[02:51.000 --> 02:54.000]  But I'm betting most customers will be camera shy.
[02:54.000 --> 03:09.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[03:24.000 --> 03:42.000]  All right, folks. Good evening. This is real-world radio. Today is May 11th, 2012.
[03:42.000 --> 03:47.000]  This is our Friday night four-hour info marathon. We are live tonight.
[03:47.000 --> 03:56.000]  And right now, Randy has some information dealing with a district attorney, I believe he said is Galveston, that he wants to start going in for us.
[03:56.000 --> 03:58.000]  Randy, you want to take it away from there?
[03:58.000 --> 04:06.000]  Yes, I do. He said we are live tonight. That's kind of iffy at my age.
[04:06.000 --> 04:19.000]  Anyway, I was – I called down to the city of Galveston and the county of Galveston about someone who's having an issue there.
[04:19.000 --> 04:25.000]  And generally, what we're trying to do is create a little politics.
[04:25.000 --> 04:37.000]  And so I call around and kind of ask questions if they don't want to be asked. And the first thing I did was –
[04:37.000 --> 04:44.000]  we had found out in talking to some people that this woman, her boyfriend, had been arrested.
[04:44.000 --> 04:49.000]  And she asked the police why they arrested her boyfriend and they arrested her.
[04:49.000 --> 05:01.000]  And she struggled with him. They charged her with a felony for accusing her of kicking the officer, but kicked her with a non-injury.
[05:01.000 --> 05:05.000]  But they charged her with felony assault.
[05:05.000 --> 05:14.000]  And that didn't look right because non-injury does not meet the criteria for felony assault.
[05:14.000 --> 05:24.000]  So I'm wondering how on earth did they get an indictment when the statement on its face was insufficient?
[05:24.000 --> 05:29.000]  So I'm figuring that the prosecutor just got in there and lied to the grand jury.
[05:29.000 --> 05:34.000]  So the first thing I want to do is trace everything down.
[05:34.000 --> 05:49.000]  And I go in and start asking about the minutes of the grand jury. I call the clerk and ask the clerk where I can come to see the minutes of the grand jury.
[05:49.000 --> 05:53.000]  And she has no idea what I'm talking about.
[05:53.000 --> 06:04.000]  So I tell her I'm looking for the records referred to by Article 2022, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, where it says,
[06:04.000 --> 06:20.000]  the foreman of the grand jury with a quorum of the grand jury present shall read the fact of the indictment to the court and the clerk shall make notes in the minutes of the court.
[06:20.000 --> 06:23.000]  Those are the records I want to see.
[06:23.000 --> 06:28.000]  And she said, well, let me transfer you to someone else. And she did.
[06:28.000 --> 06:35.000]  And about two words out of this guy's mouth, and it was clear he was a prosecutor.
[06:35.000 --> 06:40.000]  And I talked to him for a while, and he was a pretty smart-mouthed individual.
[06:40.000 --> 06:48.000]  And I asked him some very pointed questions. I asked him where the minutes of the grand jury was, and he said, you know what I was talking about.
[06:48.000 --> 06:54.000]  I said, well, I'm looking for the minutes that are referred to in Article 20.22, Code of Criminal Procedure.
[06:54.000 --> 07:01.000]  And he said, well, what is that? I said, read it. He eats it.
[07:01.000 --> 07:09.000]  And he said he wanted to know what case I was looking for.
[07:09.000 --> 07:15.000]  And I told him I'm not looking for a case. I'm looking for the records. Well, what record are you looking for?
[07:15.000 --> 07:19.000]  None of your business, I'm looking for all of them.
[07:19.000 --> 07:23.000]  Well, you're going to have to tell me which one you're looking for.
[07:23.000 --> 07:31.000]  And that didn't go down well, so he finally told me that he didn't really want to talk to me.
[07:31.000 --> 07:38.000]  And I said, I don't know what I'm doing talking to you anyway. Do you actually have these records?
[07:38.000 --> 07:44.000]  He said, well, I don't know if I can tell you the grand jury's secret. No, it's not.
[07:44.000 --> 07:49.000]  If you have those records, then you have them to the exclusions clerk at the court, and that would be a felony.
[07:49.000 --> 07:52.000]  Well, I don't think I'm going to want to talk to you anymore. That's fine.
[07:52.000 --> 07:55.000]  You can't be back to the clerk. That's why I want to talk to you in the first place.
[07:55.000 --> 08:00.000]  So they got me back. He just hung up when I called back in.
[08:00.000 --> 08:17.000]  And I asked the clerk, where would I file a request for a voucher from the court reporter for the grand jury?
[08:17.000 --> 08:24.000]  And she said, we don't have a court reporter with the grand jury.
[08:24.000 --> 08:39.000]  What goes on in the grand jury room is secret. Say what? No court reporter in the grand jury room?
[08:39.000 --> 08:46.000]  Well, there are things about the grand jury that are secret. The deliberations are secret.
[08:46.000 --> 08:52.000]  But they still must keep record. What if somebody lies to the grand jury?
[08:52.000 --> 09:01.000]  What if I challenge the sufficiency of the evidence presented to the grand jury?
[09:01.000 --> 09:11.000]  Is the prosecutor going to say, well, you can't know what information we presented to the grand jury.
[09:11.000 --> 09:18.000]  You don't have a right to face your accuser and be aware of the testimony against you.
[09:18.000 --> 09:24.000]  Well, that'll never fly, but it gets worse.
[09:24.000 --> 09:33.000]  So then I asked the clerk, since she is not holding these records of the presentments,
[09:33.000 --> 09:42.000]  I asked her, how do you find out that a presentment or a tubule has been had?
[09:42.000 --> 09:49.000]  She said, well, the prosecutor brings it to the clerk.
[09:49.000 --> 09:57.000]  Whoa. Now, the court says that if the grand jury votes to tubule,
[09:57.000 --> 10:15.000]  then the foreman of the grand jury shall present the tubule to the court or to the clerk with a quorum of the grand jury present.
[10:15.000 --> 10:25.000]  Now, what part of that is hard to understand?
[10:25.000 --> 10:28.000]  Now we have a secret grand jury.
[10:28.000 --> 10:34.000]  We have the district attorney go into the grand jury in total secret.
[10:34.000 --> 10:39.000]  There's no records kept of what's done in the grand jury room.
[10:39.000 --> 10:47.000]  And then the prosecutor brings the indictment to the clerk of the court.
[10:47.000 --> 10:54.000]  What would keep the prosecutor from simply writing up the indictment and bringing it to the clerk of the court?
[10:54.000 --> 11:00.000]  Now this is precisely what we have accused federal prosecutors of doing.
[11:00.000 --> 11:05.000]  That a federal prosecutor would get a claim and get an accusation.
[11:05.000 --> 11:13.000]  And they'll take something that's really simple and they don't even care to prosecute anyway and go in and get an indictment on it.
[11:13.000 --> 11:18.000]  And once they have an indictment, then they'll begin to investigate.
[11:18.000 --> 11:24.000]  And when they have more information, they will use superseding indictments.
[11:24.000 --> 11:37.000]  And for the most part, those never go to a grand jury because the U.S. attorneys have a rubber stamp with the foreman's name on it and they just rubber stamp the superseding indictments.
[11:37.000 --> 11:52.000]  That's why I wanted to see the voucher from the court reporter who reported on at the grand jury on that day so that we could determine whether or not the grand jury actually met.
[11:52.000 --> 12:00.000]  I asked them in Dallas County if the grand jury met every day and they said no, they do not.
[12:00.000 --> 12:15.000]  So how do we know how can the prosecuting attorney validate an indictment?
[12:15.000 --> 12:20.000]  How can he show that it was ever brought before a grand jury?
[12:20.000 --> 12:28.000]  And with this one, I almost bet you it was a grand jury never saw this one.
[12:28.000 --> 12:35.000]  Because it was nowhere near sufficient to warn an indictment and this woman fought them.
[12:35.000 --> 12:43.000]  She struggled against them, I mean, not just physically, but it was clear she was going to fight them.
[12:43.000 --> 12:55.000]  And what I believe they did is normally they would have charged her with claspid misdemeanor resist arrest.
[12:55.000 --> 13:08.000]  But in order to get a large enough charge so they could force her into a deal, the prosecutor made up this indictment.
[13:08.000 --> 13:16.000]  And I'm going to bet when I go down there I'll find no evidence that it was ever presented to a grand jury.
[13:16.000 --> 13:23.000]  This is about the worst scenario.
[13:23.000 --> 13:36.000]  Kennedy v. State says for the purpose of filing that in order to avoid the obvious evils of the accumulation of power in any one office,
[13:36.000 --> 13:45.000]  for the purpose of filing a criminal complaint, the prosecuting attorney is not a credible person.
[13:45.000 --> 13:55.000]  Because it was not intended that the prosecutor had the power to bring you to trial and then prosecute you.
[13:55.000 --> 14:02.000]  You had to be brought to trial by some third party, not the prosecuting attorney.
[14:02.000 --> 14:17.000]  But in this case, the prosecuting attorney is doing exactly what the laws we put in place were intended to keep him from doing.
[14:17.000 --> 14:25.000]  And I'm going to go down there next week and it's going to get real interesting.
[14:25.000 --> 14:35.000]  We will look at this and see what we can do to create ourselves a little politics to have a new prosecuting attorney down there.
[14:35.000 --> 14:44.000]  And this is her first term. This particular indictment occurred before this prosecutor took office.
[14:44.000 --> 14:53.000]  So we get to go after the prosecutor for something that she didn't do.
[14:53.000 --> 15:01.000]  And if he is going to be really unhappy about that, then we may actually get some serious changes.
[15:01.000 --> 15:05.000]  At least we hope we do.
[15:05.000 --> 15:11.000]  We're having a little bit of a clock difficulty today.
[15:11.000 --> 15:13.000]  Actually, I can't see my clock.
[15:13.000 --> 15:22.000]  So if I'm talking and you hear a beep, I don't pay anything into it.
[15:22.000 --> 15:27.000]  Now, and our phone lines are open 512-646-1984.
[15:27.000 --> 15:33.000]  We have Leslie on the line and Leslie will be going to break here shortly.
[15:33.000 --> 15:42.000]  As soon as we come back from break, I'll take your call because the next thing I want to talk about is a foreclosure issue.
[15:42.000 --> 15:54.000]  I want to talk about demand behind the curtain that things are not the way we think they are.
[15:54.000 --> 16:11.000]  And I seem a little distracted here. I'm producing tonight and somehow things don't look the way I would hope they would.
[16:11.000 --> 16:22.000]  And okay, I'm going to go to break and we'll be right back on the other side and I'll pick up Leslie.
[16:41.000 --> 17:00.000]  Music
[17:00.000 --> 17:02.000]  America is in trouble.
[17:02.000 --> 17:04.000]  Washington is a disgrace.
[17:04.000 --> 17:07.000]  Government has become too big. It's overtaxing, overspending.
[17:07.000 --> 17:09.000]  We need to change direction.
[17:09.000 --> 17:11.000]  We really need change.
[17:11.000 --> 17:13.000]  We can't afford to make the same mistakes we've made in the past.
[17:13.000 --> 17:15.000]  Mitt Romney's reputation is a flip-flopper.
[17:15.000 --> 17:18.000]  He went the other way when he got paid to go the other way.
[17:18.000 --> 17:20.000]  There is need for economic stimulus.
[17:20.000 --> 17:22.000]  It's about serial hypocrisy.
[17:22.000 --> 17:24.000]  This election is about trust.
[17:24.000 --> 17:26.000]  There's been one true consistent candidate.
[17:26.000 --> 17:27.000]  And that's Dr. Ron Paul.
[17:27.000 --> 17:30.000]  Ron Paul has been so consistent from the very beginning.
[17:30.000 --> 17:32.000]  He seems like a more honest candidate.
[17:32.000 --> 17:35.000]  He tells the truth about what he believes, whether you like it or not.
[17:35.000 --> 17:37.000]  He's never once voted for a tax increase.
[17:37.000 --> 17:40.000]  Never once voted for an unbalanced budget.
[17:40.000 --> 17:43.000]  Ron Paul's plan is bold. He cuts five departments.
[17:43.000 --> 17:44.000]  It's what we need.
[17:44.000 --> 17:48.000]  When he says he's going to cut a trillion dollars in the first year, I believe it.
[17:48.000 --> 17:51.000]  If you don't like how things are going, if you're tired of politicians,
[17:51.000 --> 17:53.000]  he's something different.
[17:53.000 --> 17:54.000]  Ron Paul.
[17:54.000 --> 17:55.000]  Ron Paul.
[17:55.000 --> 17:56.000]  Ron Paul.
[17:56.000 --> 17:57.000]  Ron Paul.
[17:57.000 --> 17:58.000]  He's the one we've been looking for.
[17:58.000 --> 18:00.000]  I'm Ron Paul and I approve this message.
[18:00.000 --> 18:05.000]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.000 --> 18:09.000]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.000 --> 18:13.000]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[18:13.000 --> 18:15.000]  and now you can win two.
[18:15.000 --> 18:21.000]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[18:21.000 --> 18:25.000]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons.
[18:25.000 --> 18:27.000]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[18:27.000 --> 18:29.000]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:29.000 --> 18:34.000]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:34.000 --> 18:39.000]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.000 --> 18:41.000]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.000 --> 18:47.000]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[18:47.000 --> 18:50.000]  or email MichaelMears at yahoo.com.
[18:50.000 --> 18:58.000]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:58.000 --> 19:05.000]  Learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:28.000 --> 19:33.000]  Okay, we're back.
[19:33.000 --> 19:36.000]  Red Kelton, Depp O'Steens, and J. Craig.
[19:36.000 --> 19:38.000]  Rule of Law Radio.
[19:38.000 --> 19:43.000]  And when you went out and talked about the city of Galveston and Shenanigans,
[19:43.000 --> 19:46.000]  you flew there.
[19:46.000 --> 19:55.000]  If you're in Texas and you have had an indictment brought against you,
[19:55.000 --> 20:02.000]  you might want to look at how the indictments are brought.
[20:02.000 --> 20:07.000]  The way they're required to be brought in most counties is not the way they actually are.
[20:07.000 --> 20:12.000]  They're not done right here in Austin either, here in Austin.
[20:12.000 --> 20:20.000]  The last time I questioned about this, the prosecutor brought the indictments to the clerk,
[20:20.000 --> 20:26.000]  and the indictments are supposed to be presented in public with a quorum of grandeur present.
[20:26.000 --> 20:29.000]  And those are some really important checks and balances,
[20:29.000 --> 20:34.000]  and you can fully understand why a prosecutor wouldn't want to go to all of that trouble.
[20:34.000 --> 20:41.000]  It's a lot easier for him if he can discharge whoever he wants to, when he wants to, any way he wants to.
[20:41.000 --> 20:45.000]  But our founders, when they put together this country,
[20:45.000 --> 20:52.000]  they were well aware of the evils of that kind of a situation, and they forbade it.
[20:52.000 --> 20:55.000]  It seems that the prosecutors have managed to get around it anyway,
[20:55.000 --> 20:57.000]  just simply by doing whatever they want to.
[20:57.000 --> 21:04.000]  And we'll have more about that next week after I go down to Galveston and kind of stir them up a little bit.
[21:04.000 --> 21:11.000]  Okay, now we're going to go to Leslie in Pennsylvania.
[21:11.000 --> 21:13.000]  Leslie, it's nice to hear from you.
[21:13.000 --> 21:15.000]  Hello, Patrick. I'll see you too.
[21:15.000 --> 21:22.000]  I got a week and a half ago I sent you a complaint, a bill versus Bank of America, if you remember.
[21:22.000 --> 21:26.000]  Yes, I remember it, but I haven't had time to go through it.
[21:26.000 --> 21:33.000]  I know, and you know why? It's 390 pages.
[21:33.000 --> 21:41.000]  That's probably the same one that Jeff Sedgwick asked me if I had read,
[21:41.000 --> 21:45.000]  because he said he said it would be one that was 390 pages.
[21:45.000 --> 21:47.000]  Right. It has...
[21:47.000 --> 21:49.000]  That is interesting.
[21:49.000 --> 21:55.000]  It has 2,600 paragraphs, just defining who's who.
[21:55.000 --> 21:59.000]  There's 840 plaintiffs across America.
[21:59.000 --> 22:10.000]  It's a mass-joinder suit, and it's going after all the banks, and they're offshore havens.
[22:10.000 --> 22:14.000]  Okay. Say that again.
[22:14.000 --> 22:18.000]  How are they going after the banks on their offshore havens?
[22:18.000 --> 22:24.000]  They're going after all the server stores, and their offshore havens for conversion,
[22:24.000 --> 22:27.000]  and for taking the payments when they didn't have a right to,
[22:27.000 --> 22:36.000]  and fraudulent foreclosures, and promising modifications, and inducing defaults.
[22:36.000 --> 22:40.000]  They're getting it. Oh, I definitely want to see that, because those are some arguments
[22:40.000 --> 22:46.000]  on inducing defaults that I was in the process of researching.
[22:46.000 --> 22:53.000]  And then they were secreting out their conversions international with their network,
[22:53.000 --> 23:01.000]  used to support their Ponzi scheme, and they kept making it worse, because they knew it couldn't have been alive.
[23:01.000 --> 23:05.000]  They had to keep making it bigger to make it survive, just like any other Ponzi scheme.
[23:05.000 --> 23:12.000]  Exactly. They had to keep pouring money into it to give it the impression that it was still ongoing.
[23:12.000 --> 23:15.000]  Right, a pump-and-bump scheme.
[23:15.000 --> 23:26.000]  There was something that I wanted to address, and I'll get to that probably in the next segment,
[23:26.000 --> 23:31.000]  about what I think is really going on.
[23:31.000 --> 23:39.000]  And it's not about MERS. I think MERS has been a smokescreen.
[23:39.000 --> 23:48.000]  All this stuff about the banks filing their notes with MERS, and MERS scanning the note into their systems,
[23:48.000 --> 23:51.000]  and then shredding the originals.
[23:51.000 --> 23:53.000]  Never happened.
[23:53.000 --> 23:56.000]  Horse poop never happened.
[23:56.000 --> 24:01.000]  That is just a rabbit hole they want to send us down.
[24:01.000 --> 24:09.000]  All this stuff about creating these false documents, that's another rabbit hole.
[24:09.000 --> 24:13.000]  That's because they don't want us to look at demand behind the curtain.
[24:13.000 --> 24:18.000]  And I'll talk about that a little bit later.
[24:18.000 --> 24:25.000]  But I would like to know more about how they're crafting these arguments.
[24:25.000 --> 24:36.000]  How are they making the offshore accounts an issue they can adjudicate?
[24:36.000 --> 24:43.000]  They're going after it through fraud and the confusion and the liquidity crisis and all that kind of stuff.
[24:43.000 --> 24:46.000]  They're bringing it all in together.
[24:46.000 --> 24:55.000]  Are they saying that the services are collecting this money and not rendering it to the holders?
[24:55.000 --> 25:00.000]  Yes. That's one part of it.
[25:00.000 --> 25:06.000]  They're saying they're collecting the money and they're not supposed to be collecting the money,
[25:06.000 --> 25:12.000]  and they're selling the notes into several different pools?
[25:12.000 --> 25:20.000]  That's what I'm going to want to talk about.
[25:20.000 --> 25:34.000]  Because the way you said that indicates that they could wink you into thinking it works one way when it works another.
[25:34.000 --> 25:39.000]  Let me kind of go into that so I'll make this make sense.
[25:39.000 --> 25:44.000]  According to Ginny May, and Ginny May's where the action is,
[25:44.000 --> 25:55.000]  a lender, when he writes a note, can issue a security based on that note.
[25:55.000 --> 26:00.000]  But in order to do that, he has to be certified through Ginny May.
[26:00.000 --> 26:12.000]  In order to get Ginny May to back the note and the pool, then he must contract with a document custodian.
[26:12.000 --> 26:20.000]  And for each note that he creates, for which he intends to create a security instrument,
[26:20.000 --> 26:27.000]  he must file the note and all the associated paperwork with the document custodian.
[26:27.000 --> 26:35.000]  And the document custodian must certify to Ginny May that that note meets the requirements of the pool.
[26:35.000 --> 26:44.000]  Now the lender creates the pools, and he'll have a pool for each percentage rate that he charges.
[26:44.000 --> 26:55.000]  Each note in a pool must have the same percentage rate, but they can have as few as three notes in a pool.
[26:55.000 --> 27:06.000]  He has to create all these pools, and he files the note and note paperwork with the document custodian.
[27:06.000 --> 27:12.000]  The document custodian certifies it that it meets Ginny May's requirements.
[27:12.000 --> 27:30.000]  Then the lender who is certified as a securities issuer for Ginny May and as a commitment officer for Ginny May will issue a security.
[27:30.000 --> 27:34.000]  Now here's where a lot of the confusion comes in.
[27:34.000 --> 27:49.000]  We have a deed of trust, which in the deed of trust generally in paragraph 20, if it's a mortgage, it'll be in paragraph 16 through 19, depending on how the mortgage is written.
[27:49.000 --> 28:06.000]  And where it authorizes the lender to sell a portion or the entire note, brackets together with this security instrument.
[28:06.000 --> 28:09.000]  It calls itself a security instrument.
[28:09.000 --> 28:19.000]  And it is. It's a security instrument that is intended to act as a security for the note.
[28:19.000 --> 28:32.000]  And then when the note is created, the lender will file that with the document custodian and create a security.
[28:32.000 --> 28:43.000]  And use the note, the beneficial interest in the note as security for the security that he created.
[28:43.000 --> 28:45.000]  See the problem with security?
[28:45.000 --> 28:50.000]  It gets confusing.
[28:50.000 --> 28:55.000]  The note is not a security instrument in this context.
[28:55.000 --> 29:05.000]  In this context, it is merely collateral just like the deed of trust acts as collateral.
[29:05.000 --> 29:17.000]  The deed of trust gives the borrower a claim against the property as opposed to only a claim against the borrower.
[29:17.000 --> 29:23.000]  The note is a promise to pay and it's an enforceable contract.
[29:23.000 --> 29:30.000]  The lender uses that note as security to back the security instrument that he creates.
[29:30.000 --> 29:36.000]  And he puts that security instrument in the pool.
[29:36.000 --> 29:42.000]  And we'll talk about what he does with the pool when we get back on the other side.
[29:42.000 --> 29:47.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rue Blau Radio.
[29:47.000 --> 29:53.000]  Our calling number is 512-646-1984. Give us a call.
[29:53.000 --> 29:56.000]  The phones will be open all night. We are live tonight.
[29:56.000 --> 30:00.000]  So we'll be right back on the other side.
[30:00.000 --> 30:06.000]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[30:06.000 --> 30:08.000]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[30:08.000 --> 30:13.000]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers have concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:13.000 --> 30:18.000]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:18.000 --> 30:20.000]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:20.000 --> 30:21.000]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:21.000 --> 30:22.000]  I'm a New York City correctional.
[30:22.000 --> 30:23.000]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:23.000 --> 30:25.000]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:25.000 --> 30:27.000]  We're Americans and we deserve the truth.
[30:27.000 --> 30:31.000]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:31.000 --> 30:38.000]  HempUSA.org has a revolutionary wonder food for detoxing the body and rebuilding the immune system.
[30:38.000 --> 30:44.000]  Micro-plant powder can help unclog arteries and soften heart valves while removing heavy metals,
[30:44.000 --> 30:47.000]  virus, fungus, bacteria, and parasites.
[30:47.000 --> 30:50.000]  Plus, it cleans and purifies the blood, lungs, stomach, and colon.
[30:50.000 --> 30:54.000]  Keep your body clean with micro-plant powder.
[30:54.000 --> 31:00.000]  Visit us at HempUSA.org or call 908-6912608 today.
[31:00.000 --> 31:04.000]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM,
[31:04.000 --> 31:10.000]  but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[31:10.000 --> 31:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[31:12.000 --> 31:14.000]  Brave New Books?
[31:14.000 --> 31:19.000]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones,
[31:19.000 --> 31:21.000]  Ron Paul, Angie Edward Griffin.
[31:21.000 --> 31:25.000]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[31:25.000 --> 31:27.000]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[31:27.000 --> 31:29.000]  Go check it out for yourself.
[31:29.000 --> 31:33.000]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[31:33.000 --> 31:36.000]  There's never anywhere to park down there.
[31:36.000 --> 31:44.000]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore.
[31:44.000 --> 31:47.000]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[31:47.000 --> 31:52.000]  Monday through Saturday, 11 a.m. to 9 p.m. and 1 to 6 p.m. on Sundays.
[31:52.000 --> 32:03.000]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[32:03.000 --> 32:11.000]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[32:11.000 --> 32:25.000]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm gonna solve them to the government them, pursue them.
[32:25.000 --> 32:28.000]  Okay.
[32:28.000 --> 32:43.000]  Okay, we're back.
[32:43.000 --> 33:02.000]  We're talking about how the securitization process actually works.
[33:02.000 --> 33:11.000]  The lender, in order to place a note into the pool, must forward all of the records to the document custodium.
[33:11.000 --> 33:25.000]  And he's called the document custodium for a very good reason because the custodium, once he validates the note to Ginny May,
[33:25.000 --> 33:36.000]  he is required to maintain possession of the note in all associated documentation until termination of the contract.
[33:36.000 --> 33:49.000]  So what's this crapola that the feds put out about lenders filing their notes with MERS giving them all the paperwork and then shredding them?
[33:49.000 --> 33:50.000]  Absolutely nonsense.
[33:50.000 --> 33:55.000]  The bank knows exactly where that note is.
[33:55.000 --> 33:58.000]  So what's going on here?
[33:58.000 --> 34:18.000]  Why aren't the banks, when they're commanded to produce the note, just go into the document custodium and ask him to show the note to the borrower?
[34:18.000 --> 34:23.000]  There are a number of factors here.
[34:23.000 --> 34:26.000]  Back up to the lender.
[34:26.000 --> 34:47.000]  If you're the lender and you create the pool, you put the security in the pool and then you bundle the pools into a pastor trust.
[34:47.000 --> 34:53.000]  You bundle your pools along with a bunch of other lender's pools into a pastor trust.
[34:53.000 --> 35:00.000]  So the trust itself never actually sees the notes.
[35:00.000 --> 35:04.000]  They don't see the individual notes that go into the pools.
[35:04.000 --> 35:07.000]  That's all done by the lender.
[35:07.000 --> 35:15.000]  What would keep the lender from simply adjusting the percentage rate on the note?
[35:15.000 --> 35:20.000]  Now let me back up a little bit to make this make sense.
[35:20.000 --> 35:31.000]  In 1907, there was a major stock market crash and it was caused because at the time people could bet on a stock whether it would increase or decrease.
[35:31.000 --> 35:33.000]  They called them derivatives.
[35:33.000 --> 35:41.000]  And because of that, it destabilized the stock market and caused a crash in 1907.
[35:41.000 --> 35:45.000]  So the legislature got together and passed a law to forbid it.
[35:45.000 --> 35:48.000]  They made it a felony to do that.
[35:48.000 --> 35:54.000]  And then there was a depression in 1929, which most of us have heard of.
[35:54.000 --> 36:06.000]  And in reaction to that, in order to prevent such a thing from ever happening again, the legislature got together and they passed the Glass Steel Act.
[36:06.000 --> 36:17.000]  And what it was intended to do was prevent the banks from participating in the stock market and in the securities markets.
[36:17.000 --> 36:21.000]  They could not take your money and speculate with it.
[36:21.000 --> 36:25.000]  And there was good reason for that.
[36:25.000 --> 36:42.000]  J.P. Morgan Chase announced today that in one of its investments with its depositors funds, it lost $2 billion.
[36:42.000 --> 36:47.000]  Glass Steel Act forbade that kind of crapola.
[36:47.000 --> 36:51.000]  Probably later tonight, or maybe on another show, we'll talk about how I don't think they lost anything.
[36:51.000 --> 36:53.000]  I think they set that up.
[36:53.000 --> 36:56.000]  I think they're preparing to take apart the big banks.
[36:56.000 --> 37:02.000]  And I'll explain why later that this is all part of the routine.
[37:02.000 --> 37:12.000]  But anyway, prior to this time, or after this time, after the depression, banks were forbidden to speculate with your money this way.
[37:12.000 --> 37:20.000]  Well, in 1999, the legislature repealed the Glass Steel Act.
[37:20.000 --> 37:31.000]  The last thing the legislature did before it closed signed die in the year 2000 was to remove the restriction on derivatives.
[37:31.000 --> 37:35.000]  And we all know what the result of that was.
[37:35.000 --> 37:42.000]  It took the money changers eight years to crash the market again.
[37:42.000 --> 37:45.000]  And this is how they did it.
[37:45.000 --> 37:56.000]  The derivatives allowed them a place where they could go purchase totally unregulated insurance policies.
[37:56.000 --> 38:02.000]  So your lender could place your note into a pool.
[38:02.000 --> 38:12.000]  And when he negotiated the pool into the trust, when he bundled it with a bunch of other pools and negotiated it into the trust,
[38:12.000 --> 38:17.000]  he would receive approximately 103% of the original principal.
[38:17.000 --> 38:24.000]  Now, that doesn't sound like a lot of profit, but it gets there, trust me.
[38:24.000 --> 38:33.000]  And he would assign the private mortgage insurance that you were required to purchase to protect the investor in case you defaulted.
[38:33.000 --> 38:37.000]  He would assign that to the pool as well.
[38:37.000 --> 38:51.000]  And then all he had to do was go to AGI, Sison, Lehman, Lehman Brothers, purchase another PMI insurance, change the percentage rate on the note, stick it in another pool.
[38:51.000 --> 38:57.000]  Get another 103% of the principal and another one and another one and another one.
[38:57.000 --> 39:06.000]  For a long time, I've been telling people that the banks wrote notes that they never intended for you to pay back.
[39:06.000 --> 39:11.000]  And when I say that, it sounds absolutely ludicrous.
[39:11.000 --> 39:12.000]  And it's not intuitive.
[39:12.000 --> 39:19.000]  Why would a bank give me a half a million dollars to buy the house and not want me to pay it back?
[39:19.000 --> 39:32.000]  Well, that's because they probably made 20 or 30 million on it or stood to make 20 or 30 million on it when you defaulted.
[39:32.000 --> 39:37.000]  If you didn't default, they're going to lose their behinds.
[39:37.000 --> 39:42.000]  Because every time you make a payment, they have to match it with every one of these.
[39:42.000 --> 39:49.000]  When you default, the insurance companies come in and they pay off the investors.
[39:49.000 --> 39:53.000]  The bank walks away with this big pool of money.
[39:53.000 --> 40:04.000]  So do you really think the bank is going to give you a loan modification so that you can pay back your note?
[40:04.000 --> 40:12.000]  Obama knew that when he passed the HAMP program, that was just another handout to the lenders.
[40:12.000 --> 40:26.000]  And a scam, a sham they could foster on people in order to coerce them into foreclosure.
[40:26.000 --> 40:41.000]  There's more. There's arguments about MERS that says that MERS has no standing because they have no beneficial interest in the note.
[40:41.000 --> 40:44.000]  They don't have a dog in this hunt.
[40:44.000 --> 40:50.000]  They're just an agent for the lender at best.
[40:50.000 --> 40:58.000]  Well, in looking at how these things are done, most of these notes are table-funded.
[40:58.000 --> 41:06.000]  If a note is table-funded, the lender doesn't have any more standing than MERS had.
[41:06.000 --> 41:13.000]  Because what's going on here is the individuals putting together the special purpose vehicle.
[41:13.000 --> 41:23.000]  The special purpose vehicle would come up with this prospectus that they were going to put together this pass-through trust
[41:23.000 --> 41:29.000]  and purchase up a whole group of notes and place them into this pass-through trust
[41:29.000 --> 41:36.000]  and then file it with the IRS as a real estate mortgage investment conduit
[41:36.000 --> 41:45.000]  and then sell portions of it to retirement funds. They needed long-term investments.
[41:45.000 --> 41:48.000]  Well, this was a really neat deal.
[41:48.000 --> 41:54.000]  You have the investment, the retirement funds needed a long-term investment.
[41:54.000 --> 42:01.000]  And you had the mortgages, which were long-term debt, they fit together perfect.
[42:01.000 --> 42:10.000]  Except for a couple of minor problems, mortgages did not fit into the security scheme.
[42:10.000 --> 42:12.000]  They had problems.
[42:12.000 --> 42:21.000]  But what it appears that the special purpose vehicle guys did is they would go to Bank of America,
[42:21.000 --> 42:24.000]  Wells Fargo, J.P. Morgan,
[42:24.000 --> 42:36.000]  and get a large line of credit and a six-month line of credit.
[42:36.000 --> 42:41.000]  And then they'd use that line of credit to purchase all these notes.
[42:41.000 --> 42:44.000]  Except that's not what they did.
[42:44.000 --> 42:51.000]  What they did was set up mortgage companies that they intended to bankrupt.
[42:51.000 --> 42:59.000]  They would send this mortgage company out to write these very profitable notes
[42:59.000 --> 43:07.000]  that were based on the most extreme predatory lending practices.
[43:07.000 --> 43:18.000]  And then the mortgage company would negotiate the note into the pool at a loss
[43:18.000 --> 43:23.000]  so that all of this profit they created on the note,
[43:23.000 --> 43:27.000]  they could write it off on the taxes as a loss to the mortgage company,
[43:27.000 --> 43:31.000]  then bankrupt the mortgage company to start up another one.
[43:31.000 --> 43:36.000]  And they'd get all these expensive notes with no taxes.
[43:36.000 --> 43:40.000]  And there's more when they get back on the other side.
[43:40.000 --> 43:44.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig with the radio.
[43:44.000 --> 43:49.000]  Kathy, I see you there. When I come back, I'll finish this up with Leslie
[43:49.000 --> 43:53.000]  and then we'll go to you and look forward to talking to you.
[43:53.000 --> 43:57.000]  This is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig with the radio.
[43:57.000 --> 44:26.000]  We'll be right back.
[44:27.000 --> 44:30.000]  Drew Shaw is interviewed on KSRTV.
[44:30.000 --> 44:34.000]  He was also told by ATF agents that they had been paid to not come into work.
[44:34.000 --> 44:38.000]  The ATF initially denied these claims and now variously claim
[44:38.000 --> 44:42.000]  that one of their agents was in a free falling elevator which has been disproven,
[44:42.000 --> 44:46.000]  or that they had been in an all night stick out, or that they had been in a golf tournament.
[44:46.000 --> 44:51.000]  As they try to sort out their lives, all we want to know is did the ATF receive a warning
[44:51.000 --> 44:56.000]  and if so, why did they not pass it on to others in the mobile business?
[44:56.000 --> 44:59.000]  For more information go to okcfoundandtruth.com
[45:26.000 --> 45:28.000]  And now you can too.
[45:28.000 --> 45:34.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[45:34.000 --> 45:39.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[45:39.000 --> 45:43.000]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[45:43.000 --> 45:50.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[45:50.000 --> 45:56.000]  tactics, and much more. Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner.
[45:56.000 --> 46:22.000]  Or call toll-free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[46:22.000 --> 46:51.000]  Okay, we are back.
[46:51.000 --> 47:04.000]  And we are talking about who the lender really is.
[47:04.000 --> 47:16.000]  When the lender steps forward to fund the note, most people as prudent investors,
[47:16.000 --> 47:24.000]  they exercise due diligence by only dealing with licensed professionals.
[47:24.000 --> 47:29.000]  And when you secured your note, you didn't go to some guy on the corner saying,
[47:29.000 --> 47:33.000]  hey, bud, I can make you such a deal.
[47:33.000 --> 47:39.000]  You went to a licensed professional and you thought you were getting a loan
[47:39.000 --> 47:42.000]  from that licensed professional.
[47:42.000 --> 47:46.000]  And as a table-funded note, you were getting no such thing.
[47:46.000 --> 47:52.000]  That licensed professional had nothing invested in that note.
[47:52.000 --> 48:03.000]  And my point of going here is that we think the lender sold the note
[48:03.000 --> 48:08.000]  and we think that the trust purchased the note.
[48:08.000 --> 48:10.000]  No, they didn't.
[48:10.000 --> 48:14.000]  The trust owned it in the first place.
[48:14.000 --> 48:18.000]  It was the trust that funded it to start with.
[48:18.000 --> 48:24.000]  They're the one that put up the capital to do the purchase, not the lender.
[48:24.000 --> 48:26.000]  The lender never had a dog in that hunt.
[48:26.000 --> 48:30.000]  Just like MERS never had a dog in that hunt.
[48:30.000 --> 48:39.000]  The lender merely lent his license to the actual funding agent.
[48:39.000 --> 48:42.000]  But you never knew about that.
[48:42.000 --> 48:46.000]  You thought you were entering into a contract with a licensed lender,
[48:46.000 --> 48:47.000]  but you were not.
[48:47.000 --> 48:53.000]  You were entering into a contract with a pool that already owned your note to start with.
[48:53.000 --> 49:07.000]  And the problem they had was the lenders were only making 3% on each deal.
[49:07.000 --> 49:13.000]  And since they didn't have anything invested in the deal to start with, that was enough.
[49:13.000 --> 49:17.000]  A $300,000 house, they're going to make about $9,000.
[49:17.000 --> 49:24.000]  That's not bad for doing some writing up some paperwork and telling a few whoppers.
[49:24.000 --> 49:29.000]  But they wanted more money and they found a way to do it.
[49:29.000 --> 49:37.000]  They were using the fact that they were able to now purchase insurance policies on the derivatives market
[49:37.000 --> 49:42.000]  that were totally unregulated, so they were totally in the private.
[49:42.000 --> 49:46.000]  Even now, we don't have a way to go find them.
[49:46.000 --> 49:49.000]  Because if we could, we could sting them.
[49:49.000 --> 49:57.000]  So since we can't find the notes, now we're looking to go to the document custodian.
[49:57.000 --> 50:00.000]  That's the one we want to talk to.
[50:00.000 --> 50:04.000]  That's the guy behind the curtain.
[50:04.000 --> 50:09.000]  That's the one where the banks are saying, oh, look what we did with Meris.
[50:09.000 --> 50:11.000]  Isn't that awful?
[50:11.000 --> 50:13.000]  Come and beat us up for it.
[50:13.000 --> 50:18.000]  No, look at all these documents we created that were all goofed up and fraudulent.
[50:18.000 --> 50:21.000]  Come and beat us up for that.
[50:21.000 --> 50:26.000]  But whatever you do, don't look behind the curtain.
[50:26.000 --> 50:28.000]  And it is the custodian.
[50:28.000 --> 50:32.000]  Document custodian is the man behind the curtain.
[50:32.000 --> 50:37.000]  Because the document custodian is a separate company.
[50:37.000 --> 50:41.000]  And he's the one that validated the note to Jimmy May.
[50:41.000 --> 50:47.000]  What do you think is going to happen if the bank goes to him or I go to him in discovery
[50:47.000 --> 50:51.000]  and say, I want to see everything you've got on this property.
[50:51.000 --> 50:58.000]  And I find I discover all of the document custodians that the lender used and go to each one of them.
[50:58.000 --> 51:01.000]  And I want all everything you've got on this property.
[51:01.000 --> 51:04.000]  And I come up with half a dozen notes.
[51:04.000 --> 51:13.000]  Now I have absolute concrete evidence of direct criminal fraud.
[51:13.000 --> 51:17.000]  Very good chance somebody's going to prison.
[51:17.000 --> 51:20.000]  So that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[51:20.000 --> 51:25.000]  I want to go back to Leslie, but before I do that, I'm going to go to Kathy in Texas
[51:25.000 --> 51:28.000]  because she's not going to take long.
[51:28.000 --> 51:33.000]  She's going to give us an update on a big party she's going to have at her house.
[51:33.000 --> 51:35.000]  Kathy.
[51:35.000 --> 51:37.000]  Well, hello, Rene.
[51:37.000 --> 51:38.000]  You're invited.
[51:38.000 --> 51:43.000]  Hello, it's Kathy.
[51:43.000 --> 51:49.000]  I do have just a quick I want to thank you for heading toward Galveston.
[51:49.000 --> 51:56.000]  And if any of your listeners remember Sally, that's slightly still ongoing,
[51:56.000 --> 52:00.000]  but there was actually in Hays County in that case,
[52:00.000 --> 52:06.000]  there was actually some Department of Justice investigation going on.
[52:06.000 --> 52:14.000]  And I don't think that anything's really come of it, but they know they're under scrutiny and that helps.
[52:14.000 --> 52:21.000]  So I'm thinking that, you know, if you come into lunch tomorrow, Sally will be here
[52:21.000 --> 52:30.000]  and we're going to start naming names and so pass on any information we can come up with, of course.
[52:30.000 --> 52:39.000]  But really, you know, to touch base with you and let you know that we really appreciate you headed to Galveston
[52:39.000 --> 52:44.000]  and it's a cesspool that needs to be cleaned up just like some of you.
[52:44.000 --> 52:51.000]  Well, I have a promise that if they throw me in jail, she'll bail me out.
[52:51.000 --> 52:52.000]  All right.
[52:52.000 --> 52:58.000]  And she has to ride home if they won't let her.
[52:58.000 --> 53:00.000]  Well, she stays away from the courts.
[53:00.000 --> 53:02.000]  You don't get anywhere near it.
[53:02.000 --> 53:03.000]  Good, yeah.
[53:03.000 --> 53:06.000]  And she's bringing a friend with her.
[53:06.000 --> 53:07.000]  Okay.
[53:07.000 --> 53:10.000]  The friend's the one I want to take with me.
[53:10.000 --> 53:12.000]  Yes, I think so.
[53:12.000 --> 53:16.000]  So that I have a witness with me, but it absolutely cannot be her.
[53:16.000 --> 53:18.000]  That's right.
[53:18.000 --> 53:23.000]  We're on a mission to generate some politics.
[53:23.000 --> 53:25.000]  That's right.
[53:25.000 --> 53:27.000]  Who is this guy?
[53:27.000 --> 53:29.000]  What's he looking for?
[53:29.000 --> 53:31.000]  Who's he after?
[53:31.000 --> 53:32.000]  That's what we want.
[53:32.000 --> 53:40.000]  We have more context than we think also my mother was election judge in Galveston County
[53:40.000 --> 53:45.000]  for many, many years, not all that long ago.
[53:45.000 --> 53:53.000]  And she started her college career down in that area in political science.
[53:53.000 --> 53:56.000]  She actually had classes from Alan Ginsberg.
[53:56.000 --> 53:57.000]  Can you believe that?
[53:57.000 --> 53:58.000]  But anyway.
[53:58.000 --> 53:59.000]  Wow.
[53:59.000 --> 54:00.000]  Yeah.
[54:00.000 --> 54:03.000]  But we have a lot of context.
[54:03.000 --> 54:11.000]  And I think that just like the elections that are coming up tomorrow, just like so many other things,
[54:11.000 --> 54:14.000]  we all have to do our little bit.
[54:14.000 --> 54:20.000]  And I'll just take this time to thank Deborah for getting Laura Presley.
[54:20.000 --> 54:29.000]  And that was very interesting last night to hear the some real people, real people talking about and doing some real things.
[54:29.000 --> 54:33.000]  And so, yeah, we're really encouraged.
[54:33.000 --> 54:44.000]  And again, just really, I don't have any real information for you except to say that we're doing our part and we're trying to gather up some ammo.
[54:44.000 --> 54:45.000]  Now, wait a minute.
[54:45.000 --> 54:50.000]  I've already committed you to the largest beer party in the history of Austin.
[54:50.000 --> 54:51.000]  Well, I don't know.
[54:51.000 --> 54:55.000]  It's going to be hard to beat Deborah.
[54:55.000 --> 55:00.000]  Well, I'm working on the beer today and I just told Eddie I'm working on the hard stuff.
[55:00.000 --> 55:01.000]  Oh, OK.
[55:01.000 --> 55:02.000]  Hard stuff.
[55:02.000 --> 55:05.000]  I have migrated from the barley to the root.
[55:05.000 --> 55:06.000]  That's right.
[55:06.000 --> 55:08.000]  But it's not diet root beer.
[55:08.000 --> 55:09.000]  That's OK.
[55:09.000 --> 55:10.000]  This is the hard stuff.
[55:10.000 --> 55:11.000]  That's OK.
[55:11.000 --> 55:15.000]  I don't drink beer myself, but I know where to find it.
[55:15.000 --> 55:20.000]  So I'll provide it and I'll bring the cots.
[55:20.000 --> 55:26.000]  OK, unfortunately, I'm not going to be in Austin tomorrow, but I will be Sunday.
[55:26.000 --> 55:27.000]  OK.
[55:27.000 --> 55:28.000]  Well, you know where we are.
[55:28.000 --> 55:30.000]  And so you're welcome.
[55:30.000 --> 55:42.000]  And like I said, we're going to try and get in touch with you either tomorrow or Sunday and compare notes and see what we can provide to you to help you to be effective there.
[55:42.000 --> 55:45.000]  So we're on the team and that's really all I had.
[55:45.000 --> 55:53.000]  Thank you to Leslie, too, because the mortgage stuff is getting to be so important.
[55:53.000 --> 55:57.000]  And we're all going to have to know that one, I think, before the end of the day.
[55:57.000 --> 56:01.000]  Oh, and I have some good news about the mortgage issue.
[56:01.000 --> 56:02.000]  Good.
[56:02.000 --> 56:03.000]  All right.
[56:03.000 --> 56:05.000]  Well, I'll hang up and let you tell us the good news.
[56:05.000 --> 56:06.000]  And thanks.
[56:06.000 --> 56:07.000]  OK.
[56:07.000 --> 56:08.000]  Thank you, Kathy.
[56:08.000 --> 56:09.000]  OK.
[56:09.000 --> 56:16.000]  So I'm going to go back to Leslie and I do have some news on the mortgage issue.
[56:16.000 --> 56:24.000]  One of our people, one of our people we're working with was up to date on his mortgage.
[56:24.000 --> 56:36.000]  And with all of the stuff going on and the information and news, he wanted to be sure that he was paying the right people the right amount.
[56:36.000 --> 56:44.000]  And he came to us and we helped him file a federal lawsuit under Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.
[56:44.000 --> 56:52.000]  And what the lawsuit says is, you sent me this demand that I pay you money.
[56:52.000 --> 56:57.000]  Now, I don't ever remember entering into a contract with you.
[56:57.000 --> 56:59.000]  I never borrowed any money from you.
[56:59.000 --> 57:02.000]  I don't even know you.
[57:02.000 --> 57:05.000]  So who the heck are you?
[57:05.000 --> 57:08.000]  It's called a debt validation letter.
[57:08.000 --> 57:17.000]  And it's contemplated by the legislature in the 15 U.S. Code 1692.
[57:17.000 --> 57:23.000]  And the 1692 key in this case over here.
[57:23.000 --> 57:29.000]  And what this says, he had sent them a debt validation letter and they didn't respond to it.
[57:29.000 --> 57:35.000]  Or their response, their answer was non-responsive. They didn't validate the debt.
[57:35.000 --> 57:36.000]  So he sued them.
[57:36.000 --> 57:46.000]  And he called today. He was concerned because he tried to pay his mortgage and Bank of America wouldn't accept it.
[57:46.000 --> 57:50.000]  Oh, right.
[57:50.000 --> 57:55.000]  No, that is, he was all concerned about it.
[57:55.000 --> 58:03.000]  And I said, wait a minute. That is exactly what the law commands them to do.
[58:03.000 --> 58:09.000]  They actually paid attention.
[58:09.000 --> 58:12.000]  That tells me these guys are concerned.
[58:12.000 --> 58:17.000]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig, Wheel of Law Radio.
[58:17.000 --> 58:20.000]  We're going to our top of the hour break.
[58:20.000 --> 58:24.000]  And Leslie will pick me up on the other side and I'll kind of...
[58:24.000 --> 58:30.000]  We've got one more little thing I want to tell about my prosecuting attorney and my court clerk.
[58:30.000 --> 58:35.000]  And how concerned they are about what's going on.
[58:35.000 --> 58:41.000]  Okay, so we'll be back on the other side. The call lines are open. 512-646-1984.
[58:41.000 --> 58:50.000]  Give us a call. Get in line. We'll be right back.
[58:50.000 --> 58:54.000]  Would you like to make more definite progress in your walk with God?
[58:54.000 --> 59:01.000]  Bibles for America is offering a free study Bible and a set of free Christian books that can really help.
[59:01.000 --> 59:06.000]  The New Testament recovery version is one of the most comprehensive study Bibles available today.
[59:06.000 --> 59:13.000]  It's an accurate translation and it contains thousands of footnotes that will help you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[59:13.000 --> 59:18.000]  The free books are a three-volume set called Basic Elements of the Christian Life.
[59:18.000 --> 59:27.000]  Chapter by chapter, Basic Elements of the Christian Life clearly presents God's plan of salvation, growing in Christ and how to build up the church.
[59:27.000 --> 59:40.000]  To order your free New Testament recovery version and Basic Elements of the Christian Life, call Bibles for America toll-free at 888-551-0102.
[59:40.000 --> 59:49.000]  That's 888-551-0102. Or visit us online at bfa.org.
[59:49.000 --> 01:00:00.000]  Live free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  If you're using pans with nonstick coating to scramble your eggs, you may want to stop.
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:11.000]  The makers of Teflon say their products are safe for consumer use, but some researchers disagree.
[01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:36.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll give you the details in just a moment.
[01:00:42.000 --> 01:00:51.000]  No one can deny the convenience of nonstick cookware. Pancakes flip beautifully, eggs don't stick, and clean up sabris.
[01:00:51.000 --> 01:00:55.000]  But that sleek coating may not be so slick when it comes to your health.
[01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:04.000]  When pans coated with ammonium perfluoro octanoate or C8 get too hot, they release toxic fumes into the air and into your food.
[01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:13.000]  C8 is carcinogenic, impairs fertility, raises cholesterol, damages the thyroid, and causes irreversible environmental pollution.
[01:01:13.000 --> 01:01:20.000]  Few. Like canaries in a coal mine, thousands of pet birds have died from breathing Teflon fumes.
[01:01:20.000 --> 01:01:24.000]  Cast iron, glass, or stainless steel are much safer options.
[01:01:24.000 --> 01:01:31.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht for StartPage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:37.000]  Would you give up your ability to have children in exchange for a chance to win a blender?
[01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:40.000]  How about a TV? No? Can I tempt you with a car?
[01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:46.000]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in just a moment with details on a bizarre birth control boondoggle.
[01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:52.000]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:01:52.000 --> 01:01:57.000]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:01:57.000 --> 01:02:02.000]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:02:02.000 --> 01:02:05.000]  Privacy. It's worth hanging on to.
[01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:12.000]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:02:12.000 --> 01:02:15.000]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:02:15.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  Remember all the fairy tales where someone gives up their firstborn child for something foolish like a cabbage?
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  Well, in at least one state in India, couples can now do likewise. As part of a plan to reduce birth rates,
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:35.000]  the government is hoping couples will give up all future children for a chance to win prizes, like a car, a TV, or a blender.
[01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  The program gives couples a lottery ticket in exchange for surgical sterilization and hopes to attract 30,000 couples.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:49.000]  You'd think for all that it would be a great set of wheels, but alas, the first prize is the Tata Nano, the world's cheapest car.
[01:02:49.000 --> 01:02:52.000]  I'm guessing the blender is even worse.
[01:02:52.000 --> 01:03:21.000]  Look at Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:03:22.000 --> 01:03:30.000]  OK, back to the radio.
[01:03:30.000 --> 01:03:37.000]  And welcome to a lesson in Pennsylvania about the mortgage issue.
[01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:41.000]  There was one more thing I wanted to address.
[01:03:41.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  Last week, I went to my county clerk and I was concerned that I'm looking through the records and I'm finding a real bunch of trash in there.
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:04:10.000]  And let me preface this with Sherry Lemon, that's her name, is one of my favorite human beings. He's absolutely a sweetheart.
[01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:21.000]  And I told her that her records were inaccurate and you would have thought I hit her with a baseball bat.
[01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:30.000]  She was visibly upset that I would even imagine such a thing.
[01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:40.000]  This is the clerk. This is what she does. And for me to tell her that her records were inaccurate, just really got to her.
[01:04:40.000 --> 01:04:50.000]  And it took a bit to kind of calm her down and assure her that her records were not inaccurate for any cause of hers.
[01:04:50.000 --> 01:04:57.000]  Because the last time I was there, I tried to file a document that the clerk had refused to accept from a friend of mine.
[01:04:57.000 --> 01:05:03.000]  And he was really a garbage document. It was totally word silent.
[01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:09.000]  And the clerk had a, I gave it to an assistant clerk and she was reading it.
[01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:14.000]  And I stopped her from reading it and told her, well, then there's not your business, just file it.
[01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:19.000]  Well, we have to make sure it meets our requirements. You don't have to do any such thing. You just file it.
[01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:30.000]  Well, she got to Sherry and I went back there and talked to her. And while I was going back, I saw one of the bailiffs that I knew real well.
[01:05:30.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  And he was the local Coddy-Cordy instructor as well. And I said, hey, Chet, what are you doing down here?
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:40.000]  They threw you out of the courthouse. He said, yeah, he got tired of that stuff and he went something different.
[01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:45.000]  So I told him, come with me. I'm going to need you. Why are you going to need me, Mr. Kelton?
[01:05:45.000 --> 01:05:54.000]  I said, well, I'm going to need you to arrest Sherry. Oh, man. Don't do that to me. Ah, come on. It'll be fun.
[01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:00.000]  They stand around here all day. It gets boring. So I went back to Sherry and I handed her this document.
[01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:06.000]  I told her I wanted to file it and she said she couldn't file it because it didn't meet their criteria.
[01:06:06.000 --> 01:06:10.000]  And I said, Chet, did you hear that? He said, yes, I did. Arrest her.
[01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:16.000]  Oh, man, I can't arrest Sherry. She sure can. Just threw the cuffs on her and dragged her off the jail.
[01:06:16.000 --> 01:06:23.000]  And Sherry, she just looks absolutely mortified. She can't believe I'm doing that.
[01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:29.000]  But my point was, and I made it clear to her, if you think there's something wrong with one of these documents,
[01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  you certainly have an option to go to the district court and petition the district court to have it removed from the record.
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:45.000]  And she said, once something's filed, it can never be removed. Your problem, not my problem.
[01:06:45.000 --> 01:06:56.000]  My problem is, is you are not a judicial officer who have no power to make a determination of the validity of a document being filed in your court.
[01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:03.000]  You have to go to the judge and ask him to render that document void and of no force and effect.
[01:07:03.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  We do not want our clerks deciding who can file what.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:18.000]  And my point to her about that was, is at the time, I knew I would be coming back here with this issue.
[01:07:18.000 --> 01:07:23.000]  You have faulty documents in your court record.
[01:07:23.000 --> 01:07:29.000]  And I want you to do something about it. And she insisted she couldn't.
[01:07:29.000 --> 01:07:43.000]  But she did tell me that she had been to a number of meetings across the state with other clerks over this very issue.
[01:07:43.000 --> 01:07:53.000]  Not only are they very aware of it, they're all getting together and discussing their options, what they can do to correct their records.
[01:07:53.000 --> 01:08:03.000]  From her, I went to the district attorney and told him that I'd been looking through the court records and I found what appeared to be fraudulent documents filed in the court record.
[01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:06.000]  And he said, well, Mr. Kelton, why are you telling me that?
[01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:15.000]  I said, well, I plan to bring you criminal accusations against people for filing fraudulent documents in the court record.
[01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:23.000]  He said, well, Mr. Kelton, you have to make sure you bring me sufficient evidence.
[01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:28.000]  I said, come on, Greg, you know me. You know when I bring you one, it's going to be dead bad.
[01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:31.000]  He said, yes, Mr. Kelton, I know. But why are you telling me this?
[01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:36.000]  I said, well, for the first time, so he asked me if I had any complaints to file right then.
[01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:39.000]  And I said, no. He said, well, why are you telling me this?
[01:08:39.000 --> 01:08:49.000]  I said, well, I wanted to give you a heads up and I wanted to get your position on what you were prepared to do.
[01:08:49.000 --> 01:09:03.000]  And he said, without hesitation, if you can demonstrate to me that people have filed fraudulent documents in my county, I'll put them in front of a grand jury.
[01:09:03.000 --> 01:09:05.000]  No, good. Good.
[01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:12.000]  It surprised me that he said that without reservation.
[01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:18.000]  I said, Greg, you know who these people are.
[01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:30.000]  He said, yeah, I think so. I said, these are the biggest banks in the country and this foreclosure mill frapped and dappled and kissed my behind.
[01:09:30.000 --> 01:09:35.000]  He said, yeah, I know all about that. These are the ones I'll be filing against.
[01:09:35.000 --> 01:09:42.000]  He said, it's not going to make any difference. And what that tells me is the worm is turning.
[01:09:42.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  Yes.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:50.000]  That with all this is going on, they're getting sensitive to it. But what do you think, Leslie?
[01:09:50.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  Well, today, a Morris County Judd dismissed a foreclosure filed by U.S. Bank for its repeated failure to comply with court management orders, compelling securitization discovery, including witness to U.S. Bank for deposition.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:18.000]  That is wonderful. We had a client in Nevada.
[01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:23.000]  They passed new legislation before they can foreclose. They have to go to mediation.
[01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:40.000]  Well, this guy wasn't a client. He's just a guy who listened to our programs and he went to mediation and he told the mediator, I am not going to negotiate with these people until they prove up agency standing in capacity.
[01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  And the mediator said to them, can you prove up agency standing in capacity? They asked for two weeks. They came back two weeks later and said, no, we can't.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:58.000]  And the mediator said, well, it stops here.
[01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:05.000]  So we are getting wins. All of this publicity, the pressure's on.
[01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:21.000]  Okay, there's something else too. In April the 13th, the office of the controller of the current state and the board of governors of the FDIC came to a consent order against MERS and MERSCorp.
[01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:40.000]  And the bottom line is that they stated by reason of the conduct set forth above, MERS and MERSCorp entered into unsafe and unsound practices that exposed them and examined members to unacceptable operational compliance, legal and reputational risks.
[01:11:40.000 --> 01:11:43.000]  And it's stocking in.
[01:11:43.000 --> 01:11:45.000]  Where can I get this?
[01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:47.000]  I'll send it to you.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:53.000]  Oh, wonderful. I'm actually beginning to get caught up.
[01:11:53.000 --> 01:12:02.000]  I was almost caught up today until Microsoft Word did a nose dive on me, crashed and burned.
[01:12:02.000 --> 01:12:20.000]  I have a document with 360 merge fields in it. And it merged, but it merged to a document I had deleted.
[01:12:20.000 --> 01:12:33.000]  Ooh, that was a problem. So I finally just deleted an uninstalled word and reinstalled it and fixed it. But I'm getting caught up.
[01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:42.000]  I'm getting my documentation in order and I am absolutely ready to get back to the research. That's what I like to do the most.
[01:12:42.000 --> 01:12:50.000]  And I am going through clouded title. Have you heard of that book?
[01:12:50.000 --> 01:12:52.000]  Yes, I think I did.
[01:12:52.000 --> 01:13:05.000]  It's written by a guy here in Dallas. And he's pretty full of himself. But with that said, he's also an excellent researcher.
[01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:14.000]  He has a lot of good information. There seems to be some points that he's missed and he really focused his own mirrors.
[01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  Contact me after tomorrow and I'll get you some information on this.
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:31.000]  I'll send you a copy of my quiet title complaint that we filed.
[01:13:31.000 --> 01:13:36.000]  Good, wonderful. This is where he's going to in this whole book.
[01:13:36.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  Is he saying the way to adjudicate these issues is by quiet title action?
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:44.000]  Absolutely.
[01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:53.000]  And this is what we're looking to put together is I've been working on a forensic analysis.
[01:13:53.000 --> 01:14:01.000]  And I know there's a lot of them out there and I have been frustrated in trying to find one I could use.
[01:14:01.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  I keep asking people to send me examples and most of them don't.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:10.000]  And the ones who do, they produce a whole lot of information.
[01:14:10.000 --> 01:14:14.000]  And I look at it and I keep saying, so what?
[01:14:14.000 --> 01:14:19.000]  Yeah, they violated Hope of Teela Respa big deal.
[01:14:19.000 --> 01:14:27.000]  I can't do anything with it. They're giving me a lot of stuff, but they're not giving me causes of action.
[01:14:27.000 --> 01:14:37.000]  So I've gone back and started going through the documentation with a very fine tooth comb.
[01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:47.000]  And the more I work with it, the more I find is the mess they have here out here is absolutely phenomenal.
[01:14:47.000 --> 01:14:54.000]  And mainly what I'm looking at is the deed of trust.
[01:14:54.000 --> 01:15:04.000]  It's taken a while and I think I've come to understand what the mortgage is and what the deed of trust is.
[01:15:04.000 --> 01:15:13.000]  Once we understand exactly what it is, then it kind of dictates how to handle it.
[01:15:13.000 --> 01:15:23.000]  The mortgage grants the lender a claim against your property.
[01:15:23.000 --> 01:15:35.000]  So that the lender doesn't have to file a lien and then file a court action to secure a judgment on the lien
[01:15:35.000 --> 01:15:44.000]  and then move for a judgment against your property so that he can liquidate the property to satisfy the lien.
[01:15:44.000 --> 01:15:54.000]  Because of the mortgage, you grant him a privilege in that you grant him a direct claim against the property.
[01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:59.000]  So he can sue directly for a claim against the property.
[01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:12.000]  If it is a deed of trust, then you grant him a claim against the property and you also grant him a confessed judgment.
[01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:17.000]  So he doesn't even have to bother going to the court to get the judgment.
[01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:19.000]  He's already got it.
[01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  That's why quiet is so important for Texas because when you have a deed of trust, quiet title before it gets to where they're going to sell your house out from under you, you have to clear it out.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:39.000]  Yeah, well, that's what I'm working on is how to adjudicate that.
[01:16:39.000 --> 01:16:47.000]  And I'll talk a little bit more about that when I come back and then I'll actually talk some of this.
[01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:52.000]  OK, this is Randy Kelton, Deb. Steven J. Craig with Radio.
[01:16:52.000 --> 01:16:55.000]  Call it number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:55.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  We'll be right back.
[01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:32.000]  If you set up a metals IRA account, call us at 512-646-6400 for more details.
[01:17:32.000 --> 01:17:39.000]  As always, we buy, sell, and trade precious metals, give appraisals, and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:47.000]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, sweet A, about a half a mile north of Canig next to the Ikiban Sushi and Jeannie Car Watch.
[01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 2.
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:18:00.000]  Visit us at CapitalCoinandBoolean.com or call 512-646-6400 and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:03.000]  What's been the problem with phone companies?
[01:18:03.000 --> 01:18:09.000]  High prices and contracts that lock you in for two years minimum, not FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:09.000 --> 01:18:15.000]  FreedomTelephones are designed around the concept and reality of patriotism, loyalty, and privacy.
[01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:21.000]  FreedomTelephones.com, there are no contracts, no credit checks, and no social security numbers required.
[01:18:21.000 --> 01:18:24.000]  That's why our name is FreedomTelephones.com.
[01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:31.000]  Finally, residential, mobile, and business telephones and plans that are private and never lock you into a long-term contract.
[01:18:31.000 --> 01:18:38.000]  When a low price, residential and business plans started only $14.99 and mobile plans started just $39.99.
[01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:43.000]  Plus, every month you pay your bill, FreedomTelephones.com contributes to your favorite programs.
[01:18:43.000 --> 01:18:52.000]  Don't wait, support the cause and get the highest quality and the lowest prices by calling 1-800-600-5553.
[01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:55.000]  That's 800-600-5553.
[01:18:55.000 --> 01:19:20.000]  FreedomTelephones.com, portable, private, perfect.
[01:19:20.000 --> 01:19:26.000]  Okay, we're back. Randy Kelton, Debra Steven, J.D.K. on the radio.
[01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:40.000]  And we're talking to Leslie in Pennsylvania about the morbid issues, the murders, and how things can change.
[01:19:40.000 --> 01:19:42.000]  Okay, Leslie.
[01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:56.000]  We were talking about the deed of trust, and it's not disclosed that it's a security instrument, that it's not a securitized instrument.
[01:19:56.000 --> 01:20:14.000]  Under the US-63305, it says that as the defenses and claim against recruitment in the general, that the right to enforce the obligation of a party to pay an instrument is subject to the defense
[01:20:14.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  of an ablager based on fraud that induced the ablager to sign the instrument with neither knowledge nor reasonable opportunity to learn of its character or its essential terms.
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:32.000]  Yes, fraud by nondisclosure, but we don't have to get there.
[01:20:32.000 --> 01:20:38.000]  Yet, we can go directly to the instrument.
[01:20:38.000 --> 01:20:42.000]  We can go directly to breach of contract.
[01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:44.000]  Exactly.
[01:20:44.000 --> 01:20:47.000]  That's where I was going with the mortgage and the deed of trust.
[01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:53.000]  In both mortgages and deeds of trust, there is this stipulation.
[01:20:53.000 --> 01:21:01.000]  You granted the lender a privilege with conditions.
[01:21:01.000 --> 01:21:20.000]  And a primary condition was that the lender had the privilege, was granted the privilege of selling a portion or the entire note bracket together with this security instrument.
[01:21:20.000 --> 01:21:32.000]  Now, what part of that is difficult to understand?
[01:21:32.000 --> 01:21:44.000]  It was clearly the intent of the borrower that the note and security instrument moved together so that the borrower would always know who the holder of the note was.
[01:21:44.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  Not only did the lender breach that covenant of the contract, they had every intention of breaching that covenant of the contract while they were in negotiations.
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  And that goes to exactly where you're talking, fraud by nondisclosure.
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:07.000]  They didn't tell you everything.
[01:22:07.000 --> 01:22:16.000]  And since you granted them a privilege, they breach the conditions of the privilege.
[01:22:16.000 --> 01:22:19.000]  They no longer have a right to that privilege.
[01:22:19.000 --> 01:22:35.000]  Now, with that said, it does not in any way limit the lender from being able to collect the note from the borrower.
[01:22:35.000 --> 01:22:38.000]  He still has a claim against the borrower.
[01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  He just doesn't have a claim against the property.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:22:47.000]  He does not have a direct claim against the property.
[01:22:47.000 --> 01:23:03.000]  Now, he can get back to a claim against the property if he can get a large enough judgment that would be sufficient to encompass the property to the point that he could force liquidation of the property to satisfy the judgment.
[01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:07.000]  But he no longer has a claim against the property directly.
[01:23:07.000 --> 01:23:11.000]  And that's all we're going for with quiet title.
[01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:14.000]  Yeah, he's still got a claim against us.
[01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:17.000]  We're not saying we're going to get the property free and clear.
[01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:26.000]  We're just saying he breached the tenants of the contract so can no longer exercise the privilege that we granted under the contract.
[01:23:26.000 --> 01:23:37.000]  No, what we don't, what we don't tell him is, is we got somebody standing there with this wiping big mean.
[01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:47.000]  And as soon as we get the judgment ruling that the claim against the property is void, bam, we dropped the lien on it.
[01:23:47.000 --> 01:23:52.000]  Now the bank can come back and adjudicate all it wants to.
[01:23:52.000 --> 01:24:00.000]  If there's a lien directly on the property, then they can't liquidate.
[01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  Now we have the bank in a position to where they'll come to the table and negotiate.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:09.000]  Now, they may be able to go to court and defeat that lien.
[01:24:09.000 --> 01:24:11.000]  Of course, they're corrupt.
[01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:19.000]  And I say that because it wouldn't want anybody to think that you could use this maneuver and wind up getting your house free and clear with this maneuver.
[01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:21.000]  It's not likely.
[01:24:21.000 --> 01:24:27.000]  Yeah, it's better just to transfer title into either somebody else's name or...
[01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:30.000]  Even that can all be defeated.
[01:24:30.000 --> 01:24:45.000]  You really need to consider what would be a equitable outcome and not plan on achieving something that is basically unfair.
[01:24:45.000 --> 01:24:51.000]  I realize the banks are bad guys and they deserve a beating.
[01:24:51.000 --> 01:25:02.000]  But when you ask a judge to render a ruling that appears unfair and unjust on his face, it's really hard to get him to do that.
[01:25:02.000 --> 01:25:12.000]  But asking a judge to simply take away a privilege without denying them their claim, that's not so hard to do.
[01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:16.000]  We just had a guy go in with a plea and abatement.
[01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:28.000]  On the day of the hearing for an unlawful detainer and handed it to the judge and showed the judge that this person's lawyer had retired.
[01:25:28.000 --> 01:25:31.000]  She was left without counsel.
[01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:34.000]  And we asked the court for a plea and abatement.
[01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:36.000]  And he looked at it and said, no problem.
[01:25:36.000 --> 01:25:45.000]  Bam, signed it because he wasn't taking away the entities right to litigate their issue.
[01:25:45.000 --> 01:25:48.000]  He just put the brakes on them for the moment.
[01:25:48.000 --> 01:25:50.000]  That was a lot easier to do.
[01:25:50.000 --> 01:25:57.000]  And the quiet title, if we do it right, should be a no-brainer for the judge.
[01:25:57.000 --> 01:26:10.000]  And right now, I'm thinking we're at a point where we could start getting them if we show the judge that the documentation filed by the lender is fraudulent.
[01:26:10.000 --> 01:26:15.000]  Leslie, have you looked at the notaries in your case?
[01:26:15.000 --> 01:26:17.000]  Yes, I did.
[01:26:17.000 --> 01:26:28.000]  You know, ours hasn't been assigned. Our mortgage is the original one. There's nothing else recorded. No assignments or anything.
[01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:41.000]  You have less to work with. Have you checked Freddie Mac Fannie Mae and Edgar to see if your note shows up in a pool anywhere?
[01:26:41.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  Oh, I know exactly where it's in. It's in a special pool. I got the in-stock milestone report, an in summary and milestone report, and it told me exactly where it was.
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:27:03.000]  So you have evidence to indicate that they bifurcated note in deed of trust?
[01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  Yes.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:12.000]  So I take it that's what your action was on quiet title.
[01:27:12.000 --> 01:27:14.000]  Yes.
[01:27:14.000 --> 01:27:18.000]  Oh, wonderful. Is it before the court yet?
[01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:27.000]  No. As a matter of fact, I was waiting for service from the sheriff to send it in a couple of weeks ago. I've been working on it and tweaking it and playing with it.
[01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:30.000]  I finally got it to where I wanted it.
[01:27:30.000 --> 01:27:40.000]  Wonderful. And you can adjust it once they answer. If they give you an answer you don't like, you can always file an amendment pleading.
[01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:43.000]  Yes. That's the way to go.
[01:27:43.000 --> 01:27:47.000]  Okay. Do you have anything else for us?
[01:27:47.000 --> 01:27:59.000]  Not right now. I was just, you know, wanting to share with you about the thing that happened today and that large case that was filed. It's, you know, it's really exciting to me.
[01:27:59.000 --> 01:28:17.000]  I'm definitely going to want to read that. And I think I would like at some point to get you and maybe we can find a couple others that are really knowledgeable on these issues and do a whole show on these issues so we can kick these things back and forth.
[01:28:17.000 --> 01:28:27.000]  We've done this before and the people tend to get the most information out of it when the people talking about it or fighting and arguing with each other.
[01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:36.000]  Ah, you're a follow, crap follower. You need to do it this way. It tends to bring out issues really well. I would really like to do that.
[01:28:36.000 --> 01:28:45.000]  Yeah. I'm checking into Maryland laws too because I've had some people question me saying, can you help me, you know, I need some research.
[01:28:45.000 --> 01:28:52.000]  So now I'm checking into Maryland and they've got deeds of trust like you have out there in Texas.
[01:28:52.000 --> 01:29:05.000]  Well, we can certainly talk about deeds of trust and that's the best thing about the deed of trust is you get to go to the county judge and say, look what these scoundrels did.
[01:29:05.000 --> 01:29:16.000]  I granted them this privilege and look how they treated it. They come and filed fraud, fraudulent documents in your court. They ought to be ashamed of themselves.
[01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:27.000]  They must not think very much of you, judge. Our county judge here in Wise County, his name is Judge Kude.
[01:29:27.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  And I went in there and talked to him one day this several years ago and I said, there was a friend of mine who had a case before me and I said, I was talking to Hal the other day and he started saying, Judge Kude did and Judge Kude that.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  And the judge said, well, Mr. Kelton, did you correct him? No, I think so.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:30:11.000]  Okay. Thank you, Leslie. This is Randy Kelton, Debbie Stephens, Eddie Craig, and you're on the radio.
[01:30:11.000 --> 01:30:22.000]  We did not want to hear anything I had to say. The decision was made not to pursue any more of those individuals. Some of these columns were ripped up, shredded, tossed around.
[01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:26.000]  The people that did the things they did knew doggone well what they were doing.
[01:30:26.000 --> 01:30:52.000]  Expose the cover up now at Inovalive.com.
[01:30:56.000 --> 01:31:08.000]  For more energy, stronger immune power, improved sense of well-being.
[01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:12.000]  How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits?
[01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:21.000]  The team behind Centrition believes that supplements should over-deliver on their promises. And Centrition does just that.
[01:31:21.000 --> 01:31:32.000]  Centrition utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine. In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition, adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component.
[01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:42.000]  And organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base. Plus, Centrition tastes great in just water.
[01:31:42.000 --> 01:31:56.000]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural. Visit Centrition.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[01:31:56.000 --> 01:32:12.000]  After you use Centrition, you'll believe in supplements again.
[01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:37.000]  Okay, we're back.
[01:32:37.000 --> 01:32:40.000]  Welcome folks to The Great.
[01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:42.000]  We love radio.
[01:32:42.000 --> 01:32:52.000]  And we were about to go to New York, Texas.
[01:32:52.000 --> 01:33:01.000]  Neil, what do you have for us today?
[01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  Are you there, Neil?
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:07.000]  Hold on just a second. Yeah, I'm here.
[01:33:07.000 --> 01:33:13.000]  Okay, you understand you have an update on mortgage issues?
[01:33:13.000 --> 01:33:23.000]  Well, I don't really have an update. You had wanted me to call in about, get a little more information from you about three weeks ago.
[01:33:23.000 --> 01:33:31.000]  And I've been out of town the last two weekends, and I think you were out last weekend too.
[01:33:31.000 --> 01:33:37.000]  Yeah, we had a technical eddy difficulties.
[01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:39.000]  Okay.
[01:33:39.000 --> 01:33:42.000]  Whatever that means.
[01:33:42.000 --> 01:33:58.000]  You had given me a few things to do, I guess, to get some information, go down to the registrar's office and get the information that was filed down there.
[01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:25.000]  One of the things was looking in Edgar, and I'm looking through Edgar, I'm finding stuff on the filings, but I'm not finding information in the filings that seems to show what I'm looking for.
[01:34:25.000 --> 01:34:28.000]  So I wondered if you could kind of give me a...
[01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:36.000]  Well, all we really need is to find the pool that your note is in.
[01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:46.000]  Actually, we really only need to be able to show that your note has been negotiated into a pool.
[01:34:46.000 --> 01:35:06.000]  Because if it has been negotiated into a pool, and you don't already have notification of that, and someone is attempting to collect on your note, they will claim to hold the deed of trust, which would give them authority to collect.
[01:35:06.000 --> 01:35:18.000]  So if one person is holding the deed of trust and you find that the note was negotiated somewhere else, now you have the breach of the deed of trust that we're looking for.
[01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:25.000]  We have the contractual violation that we need to make the claim.
[01:35:25.000 --> 01:35:27.000]  So that's mainly what we're looking for.
[01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:33.000]  We don't need to know exactly where the note is or exactly everything that's happened to the pool that it went into.
[01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:44.000]  The pools will generally be in the name of the lender, followed by a month and a year, or year and then a month.
[01:35:44.000 --> 01:35:46.000]  And that will...
[01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:48.000]  Pardon me?
[01:35:48.000 --> 01:36:03.000]  I said I've found things like that, and then looking inside that document, nothing stands out that would indicate anything has been sold into that pool.
[01:36:03.000 --> 01:36:06.000]  So I must not know what I'm looking for.
[01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:10.000]  This is one of the issues why I have to research.
[01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:19.000]  Now, the lender will only have a certain number of pools over the period of time.
[01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:30.000]  You look in a four-month period, two months before and two months after you've signed your note, because the pools are only open for 90 days.
[01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:39.000]  So it had to go into a pool that would have a date in that range.
[01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:48.000]  And I'm hoping there's somebody out there who knows Edgar better than me how to find if your note is in there.
[01:36:48.000 --> 01:36:51.000]  We've had people that have found it, and I haven't had them explain.
[01:36:51.000 --> 01:36:54.000]  They tried to explain it to me, but I was too dense.
[01:36:54.000 --> 01:36:58.000]  And I personally haven't had the time to research Edgar's.
[01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:00.000]  It's really rather sophisticated.
[01:37:00.000 --> 01:37:03.000]  There is a tremendous amount of information in there.
[01:37:03.000 --> 01:37:08.000]  And frankly, I don't know how to interpret all of it yet.
[01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:11.000]  But I have been able to interpret some.
[01:37:11.000 --> 01:37:17.000]  We had someone get me a pooling and servicing agreement recently.
[01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:36.000]  And it showed that what HUD and the other, I mean HUD, but MERS and the other lenders are doing now is they're claiming to transfer the note and security instrument to the trust.
[01:37:36.000 --> 01:37:58.000]  The problem in doing that is in this one, it was a 2004 note, and they transferred the note, indeed, of trust into the Deutsche Bank as the trustee for this trust in 2011.
[01:37:58.000 --> 01:38:07.000]  And that's the problem because the trust closed in 2005.
[01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:12.000]  So it's clear that what they're doing is trying to cover their tracks.
[01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:18.000]  They're trying to make it look like this thing was put into the trust when obviously it could not be.
[01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:22.000]  One of the reasons is it was a HELOC.
[01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:30.000]  And when I read the prospectus, the prospectus in this particular trust was designed to accept mortgage notes.
[01:38:30.000 --> 01:38:31.000]  And this wasn't one.
[01:38:31.000 --> 01:38:33.000]  This was a HELOC note.
[01:38:33.000 --> 01:38:36.000]  It wasn't a mortgage purchase.
[01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:38.000]  It wasn't a purchase loan.
[01:38:38.000 --> 01:38:41.000]  So there's no way you could be in that trust.
[01:38:41.000 --> 01:38:55.000]  And we put these together as arguments that the lender filed these documents with the court, knowing full well they were fraudulent.
[01:38:55.000 --> 01:39:01.000]  And this is exactly the kind of document I'll be taking to the district attorneys.
[01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:10.000]  When the district attorneys start looking at them, and you know the district attorneys are really busy, and they might like to go after these things,
[01:39:10.000 --> 01:39:18.000]  but they just don't have the time or the budget to go research out these complex issues.
[01:39:18.000 --> 01:39:26.000]  So if we want these guys hammered, we just have to do all the homework for them.
[01:39:26.000 --> 01:39:32.000]  Part of the homework, yes, is look at every notary that has notarized a document.
[01:39:32.000 --> 01:39:41.000]  Yeah, that's in the county record, especially documents coming from the lender or the servicer.
[01:39:41.000 --> 01:39:49.000]  And then do a request to the notary for their sequential ledger that they're required to keep.
[01:39:49.000 --> 01:39:56.000]  I did one to a, better if you don't do it, but get someone else to do it.
[01:39:56.000 --> 01:40:05.000]  That way they don't know what they're looking for, they don't know what to, Jimmy, what to fix.
[01:40:05.000 --> 01:40:15.000]  So I sent a request for a woman in Washington D.C. to her notary in California for their sequential ledger,
[01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:27.000]  and I got a note back from them saying that she had filed a notice with the Secretary of State showing that her cat ate it.
[01:40:27.000 --> 01:40:34.000]  Or actually, that she misplaced it or something happened to it, she lost it.
[01:40:34.000 --> 01:40:37.000]  How convenient.
[01:40:37.000 --> 01:40:42.000]  And I suspect we're going to get a lot of those.
[01:40:42.000 --> 01:40:54.000]  I suspect if I start looking this Iris Bailey, I'll find a lot of notary signatures that look like the one in this case,
[01:40:54.000 --> 01:40:59.000]  where you have a notary of verification here.
[01:40:59.000 --> 01:41:09.000]  But the only writing on the verification that is in the hand of the notary is the signature.
[01:41:09.000 --> 01:41:17.000]  You'll have a document with a date and a signature of an affiant.
[01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:26.000]  And then on the jurorate, you'll generally have a date written on the jurorate for the verification.
[01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:30.000]  And the name of the affiant written on the jurorate.
[01:41:30.000 --> 01:41:35.000]  Well, I'm finding these all in the same hand.
[01:41:35.000 --> 01:41:46.000]  Same pen, same hand, obviously, not the same pen or hand that signed the jurorate.
[01:41:46.000 --> 01:41:54.000]  So what that looks like is, is the notary came in and signed a bunch of blank jurors.
[01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:00.000]  And when they need one, they pulled it down off the shelf, filled it in.
[01:42:00.000 --> 01:42:08.000]  And by the way, the test of that is asked for a sequential ledger that the notary is supposed to keep.
[01:42:08.000 --> 01:42:21.000]  If you've ever, you've got documented, if you've ever had a notary, a document notarized, the notary will always have you sign the ledger.
[01:42:21.000 --> 01:42:31.000]  Because he's absolutely required to keep that. And when she turns in her notary, if she stops being one, she has to turn in that ledger.
[01:42:31.000 --> 01:42:35.000]  So ask for it from every one of them.
[01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:44.000]  What we need are consistent responses saying, well, my cat ate it.
[01:42:44.000 --> 01:42:51.000]  Or I have, like this one, I must have misplaced it.
[01:42:51.000 --> 01:43:03.000]  Well, the problem they have now is if you come in and say this is a bogus notary, they can't establish that it's valid.
[01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:06.000]  Therefore, you have grounds to render the document void.
[01:43:06.000 --> 01:43:13.000]  And if they've done a foreclosure based on that document, they have a problem.
[01:43:13.000 --> 01:43:27.000]  But if they've done a foreclosure, and I have two or three individuals that worked for the law firm three, four, five years ago.
[01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:34.000]  And the law firm bought them the notary stamp and they signed all these documents.
[01:43:34.000 --> 01:43:38.000]  And then the law firm just pulled them down and filled them in.
[01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:43.000]  So I get two or three of them from the same company that lost their ledger book.
[01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:46.000]  Nobody's going to buy that.
[01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:50.000]  Okay, hang on Neil, we'll be right back on the other side.
[01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:53.000]  This is Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:43:53.000 --> 01:44:00.000]  We've got radio or call in number 512-646-1984. We'll be right back.
[01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:04.000]  Hey, did you hear? Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[01:44:04.000 --> 01:44:05.000]  It is Ron Paul.
[01:44:05.000 --> 01:44:10.000]  Really? Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute. Your friends really don't care about your Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[01:44:10.000 --> 01:44:13.000]  Oh, but I'd love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:14.000]  Of course you do.
[01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:20.000]  Now, listen closely. You need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:23.000]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about.
[01:44:23.000 --> 01:44:28.000]  They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support for him during the campaign.
[01:44:28.000 --> 01:44:31.000]  Brave New Books? Did they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[01:44:31.000 --> 01:44:37.000]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect your family in time of emergency.
[01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:39.000]  Ugh, that sounds like that's shown on the Discovery Channel.
[01:44:39.000 --> 01:44:47.000]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earthskill School that you can sign up for on the website BraveNewBookStore.com.
[01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:48.000]  What are you doing?
[01:44:48.000 --> 01:44:54.000]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to BraveNewBookStore.com or down to the bookstore in person. Where's it located?
[01:44:54.000 --> 01:44:55.000]  1904, Guadalupe Street.
[01:44:55.000 --> 01:44:58.000]  There, it's sent. I even made a smiley face.
[01:44:58.000 --> 01:44:59.000]  Great.
[01:44:59.000 --> 01:45:03.000]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.000 --> 01:45:14.000]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand four-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.000 --> 01:45:18.000]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.000 --> 01:45:22.000]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.000 --> 01:45:27.000]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.000 --> 01:45:33.000]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.000 --> 01:45:42.000]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.000 --> 01:45:51.000]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prosa tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.000 --> 01:46:00.000]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:21.000 --> 01:46:34.000]  We're back.
[01:46:34.000 --> 01:46:36.000]  We're back.
[01:46:36.000 --> 01:46:39.000]  We're back with David Stevens and Eddie Craig, rule of law radio.
[01:46:39.000 --> 01:46:45.000]  And we're talking to Benio and Texas.
[01:46:45.000 --> 01:46:51.000]  And we're talking about what to look for in the documents.
[01:46:51.000 --> 01:47:00.000]  In the documentation there, that's one of the, it's turned out to be one of the primary things is that notary.
[01:47:00.000 --> 01:47:10.000]  This has been a common practice to have notaries just that worked for you, just sign a lot of documents and then pull them off the shelf and you see me.
[01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:13.000]  They made things very convenient for them.
[01:47:13.000 --> 01:47:24.000]  Now, these people tended to work for the law firms and they could have done them correctly, but they're just too busy to bother.
[01:47:24.000 --> 01:47:36.000]  And during the time they were doing that, the banks with all their political clout could pretty well do about anything they wanted to.
[01:47:36.000 --> 01:47:44.000]  But they're losing that clout and the worm is turning quickly and it gives us a great opportunity.
[01:47:44.000 --> 01:48:00.000]  If you are in a mortgage and upside down on your property or having trouble paying the mortgage, you might want to start looking at some opportunities because there's as much harm as there has been done.
[01:48:00.000 --> 01:48:12.000]  There is coming to a lot of people potential opportunity to relieve a lot of the burden these fraudulent practices have put on people.
[01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:16.000]  Do you have any other comments or questions, Neil?
[01:48:16.000 --> 01:48:18.000]  No, not right now.
[01:48:18.000 --> 01:48:27.000]  I guess I'm still trying to figure out how to make sense of Edgar.
[01:48:27.000 --> 01:48:35.000]  So I guess, like you said, if anybody out there knows more, give us a clue.
[01:48:35.000 --> 01:48:37.000]  Yeah, absolutely.
[01:48:37.000 --> 01:48:41.000]  If somebody's very familiar with Edgar, give us a call.
[01:48:41.000 --> 01:48:45.000]  As a matter of fact, I know somebody that maybe haven't talked to him in a long time.
[01:48:45.000 --> 01:48:52.000]  I'll give Paul a call and see if maybe I can get him to come on the air and give us an education.
[01:48:52.000 --> 01:48:53.000]  Okay.
[01:48:53.000 --> 01:48:54.000]  Thank you, Neil.
[01:48:54.000 --> 01:48:59.000]  Now we're going to go to Jay in California.
[01:48:59.000 --> 01:49:02.000]  Jay, what do you have for us today?
[01:49:02.000 --> 01:49:12.000]  Well, Randy, I was trying to get in touch with you last week and I wanted to file in my mother's probate accounting.
[01:49:12.000 --> 01:49:26.000]  The whole thing was started with mail fraud and my brother, still half-brother, came into the house, sold a piece of mail that was under power of attorney that my mother gave me.
[01:49:26.000 --> 01:49:36.000]  Well, I've been pointing it out to the court ever since this has been going on and the court has ignored my question, which is quite simply.
[01:49:36.000 --> 01:49:44.000]  How do you establish jurisdiction using a stolen item that goes strictly against OID versus U.S.?
[01:49:44.000 --> 01:49:48.000]  They have refused to answer.
[01:49:48.000 --> 01:49:57.000]  So the end result of it is, is that every time they go to proceed, I can bring up the jurisdictional challenge again, which they refuse to answer.
[01:49:57.000 --> 01:50:06.000]  So today they were supposed to be having a final hearing today where they were going to give the office of the public guardian a commission.
[01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:18.000]  Well, the thing about it is that the office of the public guardian was under a court order to give monthly updates on my mother to me because I'm her health proxy.
[01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:30.000]  And I was also her executive. I was their power of attorney before they removed it based on the mail fraud.
[01:50:30.000 --> 01:50:41.000]  The end result of it is, is that I went down to the Central District of California and I filed for a release by filed a removal.
[01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:51.000]  They gave me problems when I tried to file the removal saying that, oh, well, if you're a plaintiff, if you're a plaintiff, you can't remove it.
[01:50:51.000 --> 01:50:56.000]  I said, well, I was served and I was, you know, I sent back a cross complaint.
[01:50:56.000 --> 01:51:00.000]  He says, well, no, you're not supposed to file. You can't file it. We can't accept it.
[01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:11.000]  I said, well, what happened to the Judiciary Act of 1787, section 32 that says the complaint shall not be dismissed for a warrant or form?
[01:51:11.000 --> 01:51:19.000]  I said, and then, you know, I know that the state is not going to listen to me alone until I get something filed here, so you've got to help me.
[01:51:19.000 --> 01:51:24.000]  So they ended up, they lodged the complaint and now I'm waiting.
[01:51:24.000 --> 01:51:25.000]  I filed a...
[01:51:25.000 --> 01:51:29.000]  Okay, wait, wait, this is unclear. You are in California?
[01:51:29.000 --> 01:51:31.000]  I'm in California, right.
[01:51:31.000 --> 01:51:34.000]  And you filed the complaint in California?
[01:51:34.000 --> 01:51:41.000]  I filed the complaint in California because I'm asking for diversity. The damages are happening here.
[01:51:41.000 --> 01:51:49.000]  The place that we owned in New Jersey was my home of record where I served the military out of my childhood home.
[01:51:49.000 --> 01:51:59.000]  A good portion of my adult life, it was my home, no matter where I lived in the United States, so it kept that resident.
[01:51:59.000 --> 01:52:10.000]  So, but I didn't realize that my half brother had his eyes on it as badly as he did, and that's what started all of this.
[01:52:10.000 --> 01:52:20.000]  Okay, you've told the story. Now, do you have a question or a specific comment?
[01:52:20.000 --> 01:52:30.000]  My question is, have you taken any direct action against these judges who have failed to perform their duty?
[01:52:30.000 --> 01:52:46.000]  What I did was I named them individually in the suit, going after them for misprison of a felony because I presented a police report.
[01:52:46.000 --> 01:52:55.000]  And every time I presented the police report to them, they act like it doesn't exist, like they haven't seen anything.
[01:52:55.000 --> 01:53:05.000]  Okay, what was, okay, misprison of felony, that might not have been the right accusation. There's one that may be more specific.
[01:53:05.000 --> 01:53:07.000]  Okay.
[01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:20.000]  Every judge is also a magistrate, and when a magistrate has made known to him that a crime has been committed, it invokes his duty as a magistrate.
[01:53:20.000 --> 01:53:30.000]  And if this judge fails to perform that duty, and in the process to not do the phone-free access to enjoy him at right, that's a crime in every state.
[01:53:30.000 --> 01:53:35.000]  That's a crime directly, and that should go directly to a grand jury.
[01:53:35.000 --> 01:53:40.000]  And let him explain to a grand jury why he doesn't do his job.
[01:53:40.000 --> 01:53:46.000]  We had a guy that I talked to yesterday in North Carolina.
[01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:59.000]  He had an issue with a property that belonged to the city that was issued a temporary certificate of occupancy that lasted for five years.
[01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:04.000]  And he went there and said, this place is absolutely a death trap.
[01:54:04.000 --> 01:54:18.000]  The wiring is insufficient. There's no, they're having big meetings and big celebrations and stuff there, and there was no toilet facilities and just a whole raft of problems with it.
[01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:25.000]  And they were given a temporary certificate of occupancy on the condition that they fixed it up, and they just never did.
[01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:29.000]  And he went to get something done about it.
[01:54:29.000 --> 01:54:45.000]  I'm not sure what really got him after him, but he wound up being the first person in 70 years to present a complaint to a grand jury, the first private citizen.
[01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:47.000]  Wow.
[01:54:47.000 --> 01:54:51.000]  Because he followed the thunder.
[01:54:51.000 --> 01:54:55.000]  He filed a complaint with the clerk.
[01:54:55.000 --> 01:55:10.000]  The clerk refused to take it. So he sent the complaint to the grand jury, addressed to the foreman of the grand jury, a restricted, a registered restricted.
[01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:20.000]  He goes to the post office a week later and the post office told him they delivered the letter.
[01:55:20.000 --> 01:55:27.000]  But the clerk told him that a judge ordered them not to accept it.
[01:55:27.000 --> 01:55:33.000]  So he went to find out who the judge was and the clerk wouldn't tell him.
[01:55:33.000 --> 01:55:37.000]  So, you know, he was, they were calling me all the time on how to do this.
[01:55:37.000 --> 01:55:49.000]  And I said, well, go to the prosecutor's attorney and file criminal charges against the highest judge there for sending that back.
[01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:55.000]  If the judge is the wrong one, he'll scream bloody murder and he'll get you the right one.
[01:55:55.000 --> 01:55:57.000]  Well, it worked.
[01:55:57.000 --> 01:56:02.000]  The judge screamed bloody murder and got him the right one.
[01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:06.000]  It was the clerk.
[01:56:06.000 --> 01:56:18.000]  It was the clerk who lied and told the mailman that the judge ordered him not to take it.
[01:56:18.000 --> 01:56:29.000]  And he caught him at it and then he went back with claims against the clerk and they, everybody backed up and stood aside.
[01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:41.000]  And they actually gave his first complaint to the foreman of the grand jury and apparently the foreman was absolutely incensed that they had hidden this from him.
[01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:49.000]  This was mailed directly to him and they diverted it. The foreman was not a happy camper.
[01:56:49.000 --> 01:56:55.000]  And they invited him to present the complaints to the grand jury himself.
[01:56:55.000 --> 01:56:59.000]  This works.
[01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:06.000]  Stop trying to get judges to do what judges have no intention of doing.
[01:57:06.000 --> 01:57:17.000]  I go out of my way to get them to refuse to do what I ask them to do.
[01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:21.000]  It's about the second time I hammer them.
[01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:27.000]  You know, I told about the district attorney of Galveston County.
[01:57:27.000 --> 01:57:32.000]  I called him and had this smart mouth prosecutor and I kind of worked him over a bit.
[01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:48.000]  And then I was looking for some criminal complaints that were missing and called back in and talked to some clerks and later that evening I got a call from the head assistant prosecutor.
[01:57:48.000 --> 01:57:56.000]  She wanted to know about these complaints I was looking for and I gave her the name and the date when they were filed and I wanted to know what she did with them.
[01:57:56.000 --> 01:58:10.000]  Well, she didn't know, she couldn't find them, blah, blah, blah. I said, well, what is the normal procedure in matters of complaints against public officials?
[01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:18.000]  Oh, well, we look into them and if we determine that there's a sufficient cause, we present them to the grand jury.
[01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:30.000]  I told her you need to read 2.03 code of criminal procedure. She just admitted to me that they consistently committed class A misdemeanors.
[01:58:30.000 --> 01:58:33.000]  Gotcha.
[01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:49.000]  So I will be filing criminal charges against the district attorney with the grand jury based on what this head assistant district attorney told me.
[01:58:49.000 --> 01:59:08.000]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament recovery version. The New Testament recovery version has over 9000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:08.000 --> 01:59:20.000]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:20.000 --> 01:59:30.000]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:30.000 --> 01:59:41.000]  This is truly a Bible you can understand. To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:41.000 --> 01:59:51.000]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:01.000]  Thank you for listening to the Logos Radio Network. LogosRadioNetwork.com.