[00:00.000 --> 00:05.400]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[00:05.400 --> 00:10.920]  Israel said Friday its navy boarded two protest boats in route to Gaza.
[00:10.920 --> 00:16.100]  Those aboard the boats said they were surrounded by Israeli navy ships.
[00:16.100 --> 00:21.240]  Contact with activists on the Canadian and Irish vessels has since been lost.
[00:21.240 --> 00:26.800]  Last year Israeli soldiers killed nine Turkish pro-Palestinian activists who are attempting
[00:26.800 --> 00:30.860]  to breach the Gaza blockade.
[00:30.860 --> 00:35.320]  Over a dozen Occupy Wall Street protesters were detained Thursday in a sit-in outside
[00:35.320 --> 00:40.120]  Goldman Sachs where they demanded the arrest of CEO Lloyd Blankfein.
[00:40.120 --> 00:45.320]  Prosecutors conducting a mock trial demanded the return of billions of taxpayer dollars
[00:45.320 --> 00:51.280]  to the 99% and criminal sentences for those Goldman Sachs executives who carried out the
[00:51.280 --> 00:52.920]  fraud.
[00:52.920 --> 00:59.120]  This including former New York Times correspondent Chris Hedges were dragged off by police.
[00:59.120 --> 01:05.040]  Social critic Noam Chomsky told Occupy Boston protesters recently, quote, that the bonds
[01:05.040 --> 01:10.080]  and associations being established in the Occupy movement can be sustained through a
[01:10.080 --> 01:12.440]  long hard period ahead.
[01:12.440 --> 01:16.960]  This could turn out to be a very significant moment in American history.
[01:16.960 --> 01:22.840]  The MIT professor pointed out while Washington was focused on deficit reduction, polls show
[01:22.840 --> 01:30.960]  quote, the public wants higher taxes on the wealthy and to preserve limited social benefits.
[01:30.960 --> 01:35.520]  After intense pressure from European leaders, the Greek government Thursday dropped plans
[01:35.520 --> 01:38.840]  to hold a referendum on the Eurozone bailout.
[01:38.840 --> 01:43.800]  Many of the voices against the proposed vote came from the world of finance, arguing Greece's
[01:43.800 --> 01:48.160]  economic crisis was too dangerous to leave to the will of the people.
[01:48.160 --> 01:52.280]  To meet deficit reduction quotas demanded by the International Monetary Fund and the
[01:52.280 --> 01:57.160]  European Central Bank, the Greek government has laid off huge numbers of government employees,
[01:57.160 --> 02:03.520]  increased taxes on workers while giving corporations tax reductions and restricted collective bargaining.
[02:03.520 --> 02:09.080]  One in four Greek households has been pushed into poverty by the cuts.
[02:09.080 --> 02:15.480]  New census data shows the ranks of America's poorest have swelled to a record high.
[02:15.480 --> 02:21.560]  About 20.5 million Americans make up the poorest of the poor, defined as those living at less
[02:21.560 --> 02:27.440]  than 50% of the 46.2 million people officially in poverty.
[02:27.440 --> 02:38.520]  In 2010, the poorest poor meant an income of $5,570 or less for an individual or $11,157
[02:38.520 --> 02:40.040]  for a family of four.
[02:40.040 --> 02:46.000]  The housing bust has pushed many inner city poor into suburbs and other outlying places
[02:46.000 --> 02:48.960]  and shriveled jobs and income.
[02:48.960 --> 02:54.640]  Poverty rates with poverty rates of at least 40% are stretching over broader areas, increasing
[02:54.640 --> 02:57.360]  in suburbs at twice the rate of cities.
[02:57.360 --> 03:27.320]  The proportion of poor in cities grew 15.1% last year, the highest in 20 years.
[03:57.360 --> 04:06.440]  We are originators and the pathways seem to get straighter every day and I can take anything
[04:06.440 --> 04:11.440]  that belongs to me and do it too good to use.
[04:11.440 --> 04:19.320]  When I was good for the gander, I don't work for the goose.
[04:19.320 --> 04:26.520]  I know some architects, I know some engineers.
[04:26.520 --> 04:33.520]  They see the evidence, they know a certainty is quick.
[04:33.520 --> 04:40.520]  What's up with the blatant deception, what is the nature of what you might gain?
[04:40.520 --> 04:48.520]  I see something headed straight for you, I think it looks just like a train.
[04:48.520 --> 04:55.520]  It smells like a sham of something, I can see I'm playing fast and new.
[04:55.520 --> 05:19.520]  When I was good for the gander, I don't work for the goose.
[05:19.520 --> 05:27.520]  All right folks, we are back at the school of law radio, apologize for the extended break,
[05:27.520 --> 05:30.520]  we're finally getting the technical king's work out here.
[05:30.520 --> 05:39.520]  Things like I'm getting mouse clicking happy here by accident and a slogan.
[05:39.520 --> 05:46.520]  It's generally always my fault, but this time it's all Eddie's fault and I'm just reveling
[05:46.520 --> 05:47.520]  in it.
[05:47.520 --> 05:51.520]  All right, let's go ahead and pick this back up.
[05:51.520 --> 05:57.520]  Folks, Scott Doug, we see you there, call in numbers 512-646-1984.
[05:57.520 --> 06:00.520]  We still have a couple of hours left in the show.
[06:00.520 --> 06:04.520]  Right now we're wrapping up with Mary Krennic talking about Carolyn Barnes.
[06:04.520 --> 06:06.520]  All right, Mary, please continue.
[06:06.520 --> 06:11.520]  Okay, remind me where I left off, I'm sorry.
[06:11.520 --> 06:15.520]  You were asking me to read the letter from Carolyn, but I don't have access to that.
[06:15.520 --> 06:18.520]  Well, I just found it, I ran out to the car.
[06:18.520 --> 06:25.520]  The last time I talked with her was October 15th on a Friday and she said she had big
[06:25.520 --> 06:28.520]  diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder.
[06:28.520 --> 06:34.520]  She said she can't call out and that whole phone call I had with her was basically monitored.
[06:34.520 --> 06:39.520]  They're restricting her access to her regular teachers and people that have been helping
[06:39.520 --> 06:43.520]  her and gave her a new psychiatrist.
[06:43.520 --> 06:46.520]  John Bradley was involved in that with her attorney.
[06:46.520 --> 06:50.520]  The letter I received, she wrote on October 3rd.
[06:50.520 --> 06:52.520]  I'm going to just read it through.
[06:52.520 --> 06:54.520]  Is that okay?
[06:54.520 --> 06:56.520]  That's about four pages.
[06:56.520 --> 06:58.520]  All right, go ahead.
[06:58.520 --> 07:01.520]  Mary, thank you so much for the information you sent.
[07:01.520 --> 07:07.520]  I have to go in front of the Danger Review Board on October 12th, 2011 and I must pass
[07:07.520 --> 07:14.520]  that and be found to be not, quote unquote, manifesting, manifestly dangerous and not
[07:14.520 --> 07:19.520]  a flight risk so I can be transferred to a less restrictive hospital near Austin so
[07:19.520 --> 07:21.520]  I can meet with you in person.
[07:21.520 --> 07:26.520]  Can you please contact Jim Moore with the Surgeon's Commission on Human Rights in Austin?
[07:26.520 --> 07:30.520]  By the way, she contacted them to help with the Arnold Garza case because Williamson County
[07:30.520 --> 07:34.520]  was starting to say that he was unstable or mentally ill.
[07:34.520 --> 07:40.520]  Back to the letter, remind him that he helped me on the Arnold Garza case a year ago.
[07:40.520 --> 07:44.520]  I have an email you, all the dragon foe he sent me because I'm desperate.
[07:44.520 --> 07:49.520]  They recommitted me for a year on September 1st, 2011, without giving me a hearing or
[07:49.520 --> 07:50.520]  jury trial.
[07:50.520 --> 07:57.520]  Alan Shreibner, the jerk court appointed attorney who sent me here, told the judge I have, quote,
[07:57.520 --> 08:03.520]  a major psychiatric problem and that, quote, it would serve no purpose to bring me back
[08:03.520 --> 08:04.520]  to my hearing, unquote.
[08:04.520 --> 08:06.520]  Can you believe that?
[08:06.520 --> 08:12.520]  Well, Alan Shreibner and the DA were upset, the DA, John Bradley, because I had not been
[08:12.520 --> 08:14.520]  put on any medication.
[08:14.520 --> 08:20.520]  So now they have changed my psychiatrist and the new doctor, Dr. Johnson, wants to get
[08:20.520 --> 08:26.520]  a court order to force me to take antipsychotic medication, exclamation point, exclamation
[08:26.520 --> 08:27.520]  point, exclamation point.
[08:27.520 --> 08:34.520]  I really need all that information he sent me last year for Arnold Garza on the antipsychotic,
[08:34.520 --> 08:43.520]  I'm sorry, I don't know, he sent it to my email address, blah, blah, blah.
[08:43.520 --> 08:45.520]  So maybe he can also search and find it.
[08:45.520 --> 08:50.520]  I really appreciate any and all help he can give me, especially if he knows a lawyer up
[08:50.520 --> 08:54.520]  here which it all falls that can help represent me at a hearing, which they told her about.
[08:54.520 --> 08:57.520]  I am scared to death of antipsychotic drugs.
[08:57.520 --> 08:58.520]  Please, this is urgent.
[08:58.520 --> 09:05.520]  See if you can call me at this or this number or write me at this address.
[09:05.520 --> 09:12.520]  Also, could you call an attorney by the name of John Rayleigh, blah, blah, blah.
[09:12.520 --> 09:16.520]  John Rayleigh in Houston and see if he would be interested in representing me.
[09:16.520 --> 09:20.520]  I got his name from all those articles he sent me about John Bradley, so John Rayleigh,
[09:20.520 --> 09:24.520]  who helps with the Morton case, will be familiar with the corruption railroad in me.
[09:24.520 --> 09:29.520]  Also, please call Senator Ellis, Rodney Ellis and Senator John Whitmire D. Houston and see
[09:29.520 --> 09:32.520]  if they can help in any way because they also are familiar with John Bradley.
[09:32.520 --> 09:38.520]  I got these names from the articles you sent me, which any help me get, so maybe they would
[09:38.520 --> 09:40.520]  be willing to help me take on John Bradley.
[09:40.520 --> 09:45.520]  I know Internet access to look up the numbers of addresses or I would.
[09:45.520 --> 09:50.520]  I go before the Danger Review Board on October 12, 2011.
[09:50.520 --> 09:55.520]  So this new Dr. Johnson has me on unit restriction.
[09:55.520 --> 09:58.520]  I can't even go to my classes because my teachers would help me.
[09:58.520 --> 10:05.520]  And on strict phone restrictions, I cannot call family or friends or write letters to
[10:05.520 --> 10:08.520]  write letters for me or appear for the hearing.
[10:08.520 --> 10:14.520]  Dr. Johnson is giving the recommendation that I be kept here because she says I manifestly
[10:14.520 --> 10:17.520]  dangerous, unquote, and a flight risk.
[10:17.520 --> 10:23.520]  Dr. Odom was my doctor and she was going to have me re-evaluated by a different psychologist
[10:23.520 --> 10:29.520]  because she knows I'm competent and she was going to recommend that I go to a less restrictive hospital.
[10:29.520 --> 10:34.520]  But two weeks ago, she was pulled from my case and Dr. Johnson has told her to stay out of it,
[10:34.520 --> 10:36.520]  unquote, and not interfere.
[10:36.520 --> 10:43.520]  I've seen Dr. Johnson twice with a total time in her presence of less than five minutes
[10:43.520 --> 10:47.520]  and she doesn't even make eye contact with me or let me speak.
[10:47.520 --> 10:52.520]  I must get out of here quick before Dr. Johnson harms me irreparably.
[10:52.520 --> 10:53.520]  Please help me.
[10:53.520 --> 10:58.520]  Can you also call Dan White, an attorney in Dallas, and tell him I've not been able to call him due to
[10:58.520 --> 11:00.520]  everything I've told you in this letter?
[11:00.520 --> 11:03.520]  Tell him to call me at such and such numbers when he can.
[11:03.520 --> 11:05.520]  Maybe you can get Rayleigh or White.
[11:05.520 --> 11:06.520]  Please help me, Mary.
[11:06.520 --> 11:11.520]  If I can just get out of here and away from Dr. Johnson, I'll be much better.
[11:11.520 --> 11:16.520]  Thanks, Mary.
[11:16.520 --> 11:25.520]  Okay, first thing I'm going to suggest is we look at if this Dr. Johnson has made a diagnosis
[11:25.520 --> 11:33.520]  that you use this letter and file a complaint with the, I forget the name of the commission,
[11:33.520 --> 11:37.520]  the oversight board for psychologists.
[11:37.520 --> 11:44.520]  And you might want to talk to Dr. V, so he can help you in putting that together.
[11:44.520 --> 11:51.520]  If we get the doctors oversight, the oversight board looking at this doctor, it may change
[11:51.520 --> 12:00.520]  his perspective dramatically, especially from what she said in this particular letter.
[12:00.520 --> 12:10.520]  Because that may be the first place is when these corrupt officials start going and getting
[12:10.520 --> 12:15.520]  these doctors to do their bidding for them, the doctors are very vulnerable.
[12:15.520 --> 12:20.520]  If they're acting inappropriately, they can really get hammered.
[12:20.520 --> 12:26.520]  I have some very good reports from Williamson County that that is what's going on.
[12:26.520 --> 12:30.520]  Yeah, gather all the information you can.
[12:30.520 --> 12:37.520]  If you can find information that indicates that they use this doctor to make the whatever
[12:37.520 --> 12:42.520]  evaluation they want, you might get his ticket pulled.
[12:42.520 --> 12:44.520]  Nice.
[12:44.520 --> 12:50.520]  And then that would give opportunity to get a fair doctor.
[12:50.520 --> 13:00.520]  What I don't understand is, is how is the court able to remove her doctor?
[13:00.520 --> 13:01.520]  I don't either.
[13:01.520 --> 13:04.520]  I don't know that either.
[13:04.520 --> 13:14.520]  Because, you know, she has a someone treating her who is competent and qualified.
[13:14.520 --> 13:21.520]  I don't understand how the court has any authority to change that.
[13:21.520 --> 13:29.520]  This needs someone to put together some decent research to see what is actually going on here.
[13:29.520 --> 13:35.520]  The folks at the Citizens' Commission on Human Rights that investigate psychiatric violations
[13:35.520 --> 13:40.520]  say that Carolyn Barnes is the only political prisoner they have seen.
[13:40.520 --> 13:47.520]  They have horrific stories of psychiatric violations.
[13:47.520 --> 13:54.520]  One of them, for instance, involves a hospital run by the Mexican mafia that was sort of importing
[13:54.520 --> 13:57.520]  patients from other countries, I believe.
[13:57.520 --> 14:01.520]  Just this week, they just sent a 10-year-old boy back to Canada.
[14:01.520 --> 14:06.520]  Apparently, most of these hospitals have special private psychiatric units in them,
[14:06.520 --> 14:15.520]  there's other ones as well, but the Citizens' Commission on Human Rights believes she's a political prisoner.
[14:15.520 --> 14:17.520]  And they know her before this.
[14:17.520 --> 14:21.520]  They helped her with the Arnold Garza case.
[14:21.520 --> 14:23.520]  Okay.
[14:23.520 --> 14:26.520]  I don't think that she's able to hire an attorney at this point.
[14:26.520 --> 14:28.520]  I'm not really sure.
[14:28.520 --> 14:32.520]  I did all I could do to liaison that contact.
[14:32.520 --> 14:35.520]  I'm not sure what's going to happen next regarding an attorney.
[14:35.520 --> 14:45.520]  So I'm just more an activist and advocate trying to help as much as I can on this level.
[14:45.520 --> 14:46.520]  Okay.
[14:46.520 --> 14:53.520]  What can people do who are listening to assist?
[14:53.520 --> 15:00.520]  I can just say, you know, you can give me a call at 512-632-7131 if you have any ideas,
[15:00.520 --> 15:06.520]  if you want her phone number, if you want her address to write her letters.
[15:06.520 --> 15:09.520]  I'm under the impression that they started drugging her.
[15:09.520 --> 15:13.520]  We, at Citizens' Commission on Human Rights last week, we tried to call her
[15:13.520 --> 15:17.520]  and they said she was out to a movie until 7.30.
[15:17.520 --> 15:22.520]  So it's been a lot of hit or miss whenever I've called over the months.
[15:22.520 --> 15:30.520]  But I have those numbers and I'm willing to have public meetings again regarding this,
[15:30.520 --> 15:35.520]  just trying to figure out the best way to help her and make sure that they don't drug her
[15:35.520 --> 15:37.520]  or continue to drug her.
[15:37.520 --> 15:43.520]  I feel like that could be the end of her or something.
[15:43.520 --> 15:48.520]  I mean, I don't know if she can recover from some of these drugs, but, you know, I'm not a doctor.
[15:48.520 --> 15:56.520]  We're just concerned for her safety and feel that in her effort to appeal and subpoena to
[15:56.520 --> 16:02.520]  the police in Lameson County who have ripped off and abused many of us, our friends and family,
[16:02.520 --> 16:04.520]  that she's a hero.
[16:04.520 --> 16:10.520]  And I'm not really sure how to help her, but someone that subpoenaed 12 o'clock to a trial
[16:10.520 --> 16:17.520]  and has been an attorney, I think for at least 20 years out there, she's a hero in my book
[16:17.520 --> 16:19.520]  and she set this for appeal.
[16:19.520 --> 16:23.520]  This all happened the day or the day after she set this trial for appeal.
[16:23.520 --> 16:28.520]  So as far as I'm concerned, she is a hero and she needs help.
[16:28.520 --> 16:30.520]  And I'm just trying to figure out how to do it.
[16:30.520 --> 16:32.520]  So I don't know.
[16:32.520 --> 16:33.520]  Y'all have any ideas?
[16:33.520 --> 16:35.520]  Call me or come to Eddie's class.
[16:35.520 --> 16:36.520]  Okay.
[16:36.520 --> 16:39.520]  When we come back, we'll give out your phone number again and email if you want to
[16:39.520 --> 16:46.520]  so that people can contact you where maybe we can get something ripped out we can do to help in Sparks.
[16:46.520 --> 16:49.520]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stephens, Eddie Craig.
[16:49.520 --> 16:51.520]  We're live on radio.
[16:51.520 --> 16:53.520]  We're going to break.
[16:53.520 --> 16:57.520]  Call in 512-646-1984.
[16:57.520 --> 17:26.520]  We'll be right back.
[17:27.520 --> 17:56.520]  We'll be right back.
[17:56.520 --> 17:59.520]  I'm Ron Paul and I approve this message.
[18:26.520 --> 18:28.520]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports.
[18:28.520 --> 18:33.520]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.520 --> 18:38.520]  The Michael Maris proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.520 --> 18:40.520]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.520 --> 18:46.520]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Maris banner
[18:46.520 --> 18:49.520]  or email Michael Maris at yahoo.com.
[18:49.520 --> 18:57.520]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.520 --> 19:01.520]  To learn how to stop debt collectors next.
[19:01.520 --> 19:04.520]  Well, don't let nothing get to you.
[19:04.520 --> 19:07.520]  Only the father can deliver you.
[19:07.520 --> 19:10.520]  And don't let bad-mine people hurt you.
[19:10.520 --> 19:13.520]  Until safe and get behind you.
[19:13.520 --> 19:16.520]  Norman, my friend.
[19:16.520 --> 19:19.520]  Hi folks, we are back on ruleoflaw radio.
[19:19.520 --> 19:22.520]  This is our Friday night for our marathon.
[19:22.520 --> 19:25.520]  We have not quite two hours left in the show.
[19:25.520 --> 19:30.520]  Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[19:30.520 --> 19:35.520]  We are going to go ahead and finish up with Mary dealing with the Carolyn Barnes issue.
[19:35.520 --> 19:38.520]  All right, Mary, please go ahead.
[19:38.520 --> 19:44.520]  Well, I guess that's about the end of it right now.
[19:44.520 --> 19:52.520]  I'm with Mike Tells, I'm about to write another request for a mental advocate to come in
[19:52.520 --> 20:01.520]  and work on a media story about the kind of abuse and the psychiatric care
[20:01.520 --> 20:06.520]  and things like this going on and trying to use Carolyn as an example.
[20:06.520 --> 20:11.520]  And hopefully continue to get some help with the Citizens' Commission on Human Rights.
[20:11.520 --> 20:18.520]  So if anyone has any ideas, give me a call at 512-632-7131.
[20:18.520 --> 20:21.520]  You can also text me.
[20:21.520 --> 20:23.520]  Yes, you can.
[20:23.520 --> 20:30.520]  You can also, if you have any suggestions, if anybody's had any experience with this kind of issue
[20:30.520 --> 20:39.520]  or anybody just wants to help, one thing that is absolutely great that I've had experience for that myself is letters.
[20:39.520 --> 20:48.520]  Mary, if you can get a letter to the address of where Carolyn sat, we'll start writing her letters.
[20:48.520 --> 20:54.520]  If you folks would write letters and ask questions, you know, ask the facility how she's doing,
[20:54.520 --> 20:59.520]  how she's being treated, express your concern.
[20:59.520 --> 21:06.520]  If you folks started writing letters into the jail, they started calling me Mr. Kelton.
[21:06.520 --> 21:12.520]  It really made a difference, and it especially makes a difference when you're sitting in there
[21:12.520 --> 21:17.520]  and you don't know if anybody outside even knows you're there or cares.
[21:17.520 --> 21:23.520]  When you get letters from the outside, it is incredible what it does for your morale.
[21:23.520 --> 21:30.520]  So if anybody wants to help, you can email me, Randy at rule of law radio,
[21:30.520 --> 21:40.520]  and I will give it to any messages you want to, to Mary so we can get something going for Carolyn.
[21:40.520 --> 21:42.520]  Let me go ahead and just give her address out.
[21:42.520 --> 21:52.520]  It's Carolyn Barnes at North Texas State Hospital, Maple's unit, post office box 2231,
[21:52.520 --> 22:04.520]  Vernon, Texas, 76385, post office box 2231, Vernon, Texas, 76385, Carolyn Barnes,
[22:04.520 --> 22:07.520]  North Texas State Hospital, Maple's unit.
[22:07.520 --> 22:23.520]  You can reach her at 940-552-4458 or 940-552-4308.
[22:23.520 --> 22:34.520]  And a call like this doesn't take long to do it, and it will have such an impact.
[22:34.520 --> 22:39.520]  Just before she got put in this restrictive area, Randy had talked with her
[22:39.520 --> 22:45.520]  and before you had gotten arrested and jailed about a month and a half ago about being on the air,
[22:45.520 --> 22:49.520]  and we're about to do a broadcast with her on the air, weren't we?
[22:49.520 --> 22:55.520]  Yes. And if we can get her to the phone, we can still do that.
[22:55.520 --> 22:58.520]  Okay.
[22:58.520 --> 23:04.520]  And that would be great to have a recording of her absolutely coherent and lucid and not,
[23:04.520 --> 23:07.520]  you know, having her sounding good.
[23:07.520 --> 23:14.520]  It'll be a good, it may help her in her fight to get out of there.
[23:14.520 --> 23:16.520]  Okay. Thank you very much, Mary.
[23:16.520 --> 23:17.520]  Thank you.
[23:17.520 --> 23:21.520]  If something comes up, let us know. We'll bring you back on.
[23:21.520 --> 23:22.520]  Thank you.
[23:22.520 --> 23:24.520]  Okay. Good night.
[23:24.520 --> 23:30.520]  Now we're going to go to Doug in Texas. Doug, what do you have for us tonight?
[23:30.520 --> 23:37.520]  Well, Randy, I'm going to try to be coherent and lucid.
[23:37.520 --> 23:44.520]  Tell me what you know about filing your warranted deed with the county.
[23:44.520 --> 23:56.520]  Do you benefit from doing so, or is that like filing your vehicle, registering as motor vehicle?
[23:56.520 --> 24:04.520]  Well, you're talking about your deed of trust, the deed that shows that you own the property.
[24:04.520 --> 24:06.520]  No, I have a deed of warranty.
[24:06.520 --> 24:09.520]  Okay. What a warranty deed, deed of trust.
[24:09.520 --> 24:14.520]  That means that you own the property. That should be filed in the public record.
[24:14.520 --> 24:15.520]  Well...
[24:15.520 --> 24:17.520]  But it really doesn't make...
[24:17.520 --> 24:18.520]  They tax you.
[24:18.520 --> 24:22.520]  Go ahead.
[24:22.520 --> 24:26.520]  They tax you, Randy. We can get on there and do that.
[24:26.520 --> 24:33.520]  They send you a little bill for this property every month.
[24:33.520 --> 24:36.520]  Well, you get taxed on your property anyway.
[24:36.520 --> 24:45.520]  Well, what I'm saying is, does it personally have a right to own a piece of real estate in the state of Texas?
[24:45.520 --> 24:50.520]  I suppose he does. I take it there's more to that question.
[24:50.520 --> 24:58.520]  Well, what I'm saying is, if you have the right to own a piece of real estate in the state of Texas,
[24:58.520 --> 25:10.520]  and you've paid for it, you can't tax right, right?
[25:10.520 --> 25:19.520]  I'm not sure how to answer that. Eddie, you're more familiar in this area than I am.
[25:19.520 --> 25:20.520]  Right.
[25:20.520 --> 25:27.520]  Well, the question is, is whether or not they can tax a right, in this case the right to own property.
[25:27.520 --> 25:32.520]  They're not taxing the right to own it. They're taxing the property itself.
[25:32.520 --> 25:38.520]  The problem is, is whether or not that property was actually ever taxable to begin with.
[25:38.520 --> 25:46.520]  There is nothing in any Constitution, anywhere that allows the government to tax private property.
[25:46.520 --> 25:52.520]  Now, they've tried to interpret it that way, but think about it.
[25:52.520 --> 26:02.520]  How can you own a piece of property if someone else has the right to place a tax on that ownership of that property,
[26:02.520 --> 26:07.520]  and then take the property away from you if you won't pay the tax they set,
[26:07.520 --> 26:13.520]  and they can set the tax at any rate they want to at any time they want to.
[26:13.520 --> 26:21.520]  That's just asking for the property to be stolen by making it impossible to pay the tax,
[26:21.520 --> 26:24.520]  which is pretty much what they're doing.
[26:24.520 --> 26:29.520]  Eddie, I couldn't say more eloquently myself.
[26:29.520 --> 26:38.520]  In other words, I pay for the property, and I buy my boots.
[26:38.520 --> 26:48.520]  I don't pay taxes on them every year, and for the duration, I don't pay my boot tax.
[26:48.520 --> 26:57.520]  But if I have a right to own this piece of property, then I own it.
[26:57.520 --> 27:00.520]  I've talked to some legal experts.
[27:00.520 --> 27:07.520]  They said, I've got my deed of warranty, which the lawyers worked out.
[27:07.520 --> 27:14.520]  They said that I bought this property, it belongs to me.
[27:14.520 --> 27:19.520]  I haven't registered it at the courthouse.
[27:19.520 --> 27:29.520]  You're talking about registering vehicles down there, and then you ask the state to come part of your little transaction or whatever.
[27:29.520 --> 27:35.520]  I haven't done that, and I don't think I'm going to do it.
[27:35.520 --> 27:41.520]  As I understand, the state can only tax your property if they have an interest in it.
[27:41.520 --> 27:57.520]  We had a guy from New York who used a procedure where he sent a letter to the county asking the state if they had an interest in your property.
[27:57.520 --> 28:01.520]  They would send back a letter saying, no, they don't.
[28:01.520 --> 28:11.520]  Then he'd send back another letter asking them to move it to the private, to some, there's two places where they're registered.
[28:11.520 --> 28:19.520]  This is not my area, but they'd move it to a private section that would take it off to tax rolls.
[28:19.520 --> 28:28.520]  From shows we've done before, apparently they can only tax property if the state has an interest in, and that's what the title means.
[28:28.520 --> 28:34.520]  The state has an interest, and this had to do with the land patent.
[28:34.520 --> 28:41.520]  The land patent showed full ownership and it eliminated the title.
[28:41.520 --> 28:44.520]  Yeah, a lot of them, a lot of the old titles.
[28:44.520 --> 28:53.520]  And I talked to my good friend, Desi Andrews, and she advised me just don't register it with the county.
[28:53.520 --> 29:05.520]  I've got my little warranty deed that says that I own this property, and I've made no effort to go down there and register it with the county.
[29:05.520 --> 29:10.520]  I don't think I need to, just like registering a car.
[29:10.520 --> 29:14.520]  Okay, are they taxing you on it, Tim?
[29:14.520 --> 29:30.520]  Well, what they've been doing, Randy, is the people that I bought it from, they send it in care of the deal you took, you know, dug where or whatever.
[29:30.520 --> 29:37.520]  Oh, so they're building the people you bought it from and those people you see them need to build.
[29:37.520 --> 29:38.520]  Right.
[29:38.520 --> 29:44.520]  Okay, hold on, we're about to go to break. This is Randy Kelton there with Stephen Teddy Craig, we have a radio.
[29:44.520 --> 29:55.520]  Our call in number is 655126461984. Give us a call, please. Stop the chops.
[29:55.520 --> 29:59.520]  We haven't had a really hard question.
[29:59.520 --> 30:05.520]  This is building seven, a 47 story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[30:05.520 --> 30:12.520]  The government says that fire brought it down. However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[30:12.520 --> 30:15.520]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[30:15.520 --> 30:17.520]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[30:17.520 --> 30:19.520]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[30:19.520 --> 30:20.520]  I'm a structural engineer.
[30:20.520 --> 30:21.520]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[30:21.520 --> 30:22.520]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[30:22.520 --> 30:24.520]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[30:24.520 --> 30:26.520]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[30:26.520 --> 30:30.520]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[30:30.520 --> 30:36.520]  My resolve is weak. It needs a solution. Now research has a new contribution.
[30:36.520 --> 30:41.520]  A few simple changes, a small evolution will help you to keep your next resolution.
[30:41.520 --> 30:46.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht with some tips on improving your willpower next.
[30:46.520 --> 30:51.520]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:51.520 --> 30:56.520]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[30:56.520 --> 31:01.520]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[31:01.520 --> 31:04.520]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[31:04.520 --> 31:08.520]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[31:08.520 --> 31:12.520]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[31:12.520 --> 31:15.520]  Start over with StartPage.
[31:15.520 --> 31:19.520]  Willpower, if we had enough of it, we could conquer the world,
[31:19.520 --> 31:24.520]  earn that big promotion, stay away from gooey cupcakes and always do the right thing.
[31:24.520 --> 31:26.520]  We're glad we don't always stay the course.
[31:26.520 --> 31:30.520]  But willpower may be about more than just saying no to things.
[31:30.520 --> 31:35.520]  According to a new book, self-control is directly linked to how much sugar and sleep we get.
[31:35.520 --> 31:40.520]  Amazingly, that means the best way to increase your willpower for a tough challenge
[31:40.520 --> 31:46.520]  is to get more sleep and say yes to sugar. The key is not to overdo either one.
[31:46.520 --> 31:50.520]  So now I'm set to take on the world with a tasty snack and a power nap.
[31:50.520 --> 31:55.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:21.520 --> 32:23.520]  Hi folks, we are back.
[32:23.520 --> 32:25.520]  This is the rules and law video.
[32:25.520 --> 32:28.520]  This is Randy Kelton, Edward Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[32:28.520 --> 32:31.520]  This is our Friday night for our marathon.
[32:31.520 --> 32:34.520]  We have about an hour and a half left in the show.
[32:34.520 --> 32:36.520]  We are taking your calls.
[32:36.520 --> 32:40.520]  The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[32:40.520 --> 32:44.520]  Right now, we are talking with Doug in Texas.
[32:44.520 --> 32:46.520]  I believe his issue is property taxes.
[32:46.520 --> 32:49.520]  All right, Doug, please continue.
[32:49.520 --> 32:57.520]  Okay, Eddie, I know a guy named Leonard Fisher, Leonard Boyce Fisher.
[32:57.520 --> 32:59.520]  Do you know him?
[32:59.520 --> 33:01.520]  No, can't say that I do.
[33:01.520 --> 33:08.520]  Okay, he says the question is, do you have a right to own property in the state of Texas?
[33:08.520 --> 33:12.520]  And if it's a right, it can't be taxed.
[33:12.520 --> 33:14.520]  You know that.
[33:14.520 --> 33:15.520]  Right.
[33:15.520 --> 33:25.520]  And he says, well, what they do is they get your deed in all caps, which makes you a corporation,
[33:25.520 --> 33:27.520]  therefore, they have a right.
[33:27.520 --> 33:29.520]  Wait, no, no, no, no.
[33:29.520 --> 33:31.520]  Come on.
[33:31.520 --> 33:34.520]  It doesn't make you a corporation.
[33:34.520 --> 33:39.520]  You don't get to, these people are playing around with the meanings of words.
[33:39.520 --> 33:43.520]  Corporation is a term of art.
[33:43.520 --> 33:44.520]  Person.
[33:44.520 --> 33:51.520]  Corporation is a term of art that has a legal meaning.
[33:51.520 --> 34:00.520]  If your names in all caps makes you a corporation, show me the articles of incorporation.
[34:00.520 --> 34:07.520]  If you don't have articles of incorporation, you don't have a corporation.
[34:07.520 --> 34:10.520]  That's what defines a corporation.
[34:10.520 --> 34:16.520]  So these guys may be talking about something, but it's not a corporation.
[34:16.520 --> 34:20.520]  Well, Randy, do you have a straw man?
[34:20.520 --> 34:23.520]  No, you don't have a straw man.
[34:23.520 --> 34:29.520]  You have a private person and a public person when I'm in the private.
[34:29.520 --> 34:39.520]  When you and I are dealing with one another personally and privately, I'm not in my straw man, so to speak.
[34:39.520 --> 34:47.520]  When I'm dealing with government or I'm dealing in commerce, I'm in my public person.
[34:47.520 --> 34:56.520]  This corporation stuff, it's like some kind of magic mumbo-jumbo.
[34:56.520 --> 35:01.520]  You're saying your corporation absolutely cannot be.
[35:01.520 --> 35:05.520]  Randy, why would they print it in all caps?
[35:05.520 --> 35:07.520]  And I insisted.
[35:07.520 --> 35:09.520]  Now, wait a minute, wait a minute.
[35:09.520 --> 35:19.520]  Just because they print it in all caps does not mean anything unless the law says it means something.
[35:19.520 --> 35:24.520]  Where does the law say it means something?
[35:24.520 --> 35:26.520]  I don't know, but why would...
[35:26.520 --> 35:28.520]  I don't either.
[35:28.520 --> 35:30.520]  Why does the sky hold up over us?
[35:30.520 --> 35:34.520]  Does that mean we're in a corporation because the sky stays up?
[35:34.520 --> 35:36.520]  It's the same logic.
[35:36.520 --> 35:38.520]  Okay, well, I guess...
[35:38.520 --> 35:40.520]  It's called a non-sequitur.
[35:40.520 --> 35:42.520]  It does not follow.
[35:42.520 --> 35:55.520]  Just because they print your name in all caps, I have never had anybody show me anything that indicated that that meant anything at all,
[35:55.520 --> 36:02.520]  other than teletypes only used one set of cases, uppercase letters.
[36:02.520 --> 36:05.520]  Okay, that's what Desi told me.
[36:05.520 --> 36:11.520]  That's exactly what Desi told me, that it really didn't matter.
[36:11.520 --> 36:17.520]  And maybe I'm just listening to Patriot legend or something like that.
[36:17.520 --> 36:24.520]  There may be talking about something, but it's not corporation.
[36:24.520 --> 36:27.520]  Well, why not just do it right?
[36:27.520 --> 36:36.520]  You know, it's just as simple to type it out as my Christian name with, you know, stars with a capital.
[36:36.520 --> 36:43.520]  Okay, Doug, there's probably 10,000 things I could come up with like that.
[36:43.520 --> 36:48.520]  Why do they use white paper instead of green paper?
[36:48.520 --> 36:49.520]  Why?
[36:49.520 --> 36:53.520]  If they used green paper, it would be more valuable.
[36:53.520 --> 36:55.520]  They cost money screened.
[36:55.520 --> 36:56.520]  Why?
[36:56.520 --> 37:00.520]  You know, this kind of logic makes absolutely no sense.
[37:00.520 --> 37:02.520]  I understand what you're saying.
[37:02.520 --> 37:04.520]  I understand what you're saying, Randy.
[37:04.520 --> 37:14.520]  But what I'm saying is that if I don't render my property to them, they don't have any hold on me.
[37:14.520 --> 37:16.520]  They don't have a...
[37:16.520 --> 37:22.520]  Okay, there was a way to do this, and there was part of this that made sense.
[37:22.520 --> 37:32.520]  The state, when they originally granted property, they owned almost all of the property, and they sold it to people.
[37:32.520 --> 37:35.520]  And they would take a title.
[37:35.520 --> 37:40.520]  They would take the title as a lien against the property until it was paid for.
[37:40.520 --> 37:47.520]  Once it was paid for, they were supposed to bring forward the land patent, and then the state had no more claim.
[37:47.520 --> 37:48.520]  Why?
[37:48.520 --> 37:57.520]  They didn't bring forward the land patent, and the state maintains effectively the title established as a lien against the property,
[37:57.520 --> 38:00.520]  and that's what gives them the right to tax it.
[38:00.520 --> 38:03.520]  And this is why people were talking about bringing forward the land patent.
[38:03.520 --> 38:08.520]  They said nothing to do with corporations or all caps or any of that stuff.
[38:08.520 --> 38:20.520]  And the guy in New York, he's kind of in jail now. He pulled a weapon on some public officials, and he's gone bye-bye for a while.
[38:20.520 --> 38:25.520]  But that's what he would challenge.
[38:25.520 --> 38:31.520]  He would challenge the state having a claim against the property.
[38:31.520 --> 38:38.520]  And if they didn't have a claim, he'd ask to move them over it, move the property to where it was off the tax rules.
[38:38.520 --> 38:39.520]  Right.
[38:39.520 --> 38:47.520]  He says, I don't know much more about it. He seemed to be having good luck with it.
[38:47.520 --> 38:51.520]  And there may be somebody out there who knows how to do this.
[38:51.520 --> 39:01.520]  A car board is building up, and I don't know much more about this, so I'm kind of beating the dead horse. I hope you're not a horse lover.
[39:01.520 --> 39:02.520]  Yeah, yeah, I love horses.
[39:02.520 --> 39:05.520]  Okay, you got anything else for us, Doug?
[39:05.520 --> 39:10.520]  No, I love horses. I don't want to save you anymore.
[39:10.520 --> 39:18.520]  Okay, then I won't be kicking the dead horse. I'm here at Ken's house, so I can't say a cat, so I can't get dead cats.
[39:18.520 --> 39:24.520]  Okay, so we'll just go on to Dan in Connecticut.
[39:24.520 --> 39:27.520]  Hello, Mr. Dan, how are you today?
[39:27.520 --> 39:30.520]  Well, your mail came back, first of all.
[39:30.520 --> 39:34.520]  Yeah, I guess since I got out, they started sending my mail back.
[39:34.520 --> 39:40.520]  Yeah, I don't know why. I figured they would enjoy receiving it.
[39:40.520 --> 39:56.520]  Anyway, I'm going to keep this as hypothetical as I can due to the circumstances, but it appears a whole bunch of pro-says in this hypothetical town have got a little P.O. at this person in person, the town attorney.
[39:56.520 --> 40:02.520]  And they all ganged up on this person in the wrong filing suit.
[40:02.520 --> 40:17.520]  Basically, it relates to tax foreclosure. A basic rundown, the particular charter of this particular town states that the actual person who's supposed to represent the town actually has to be appointed by the town council.
[40:17.520 --> 40:25.520]  Well, with this one attorney, that didn't happen. On the other hand, they did appoint a town council, but they're basically his firm.
[40:25.520 --> 40:36.520]  What the town will do is it will collect a retainer from the city and then it will push properties into foreclosure to foreclose on the properties and rack up attorney's fees, on the other hand.
[40:36.520 --> 40:49.520]  So it's getting paid twice. A lot of these people also told me that what the town will do is not only will the town file suit and try to push it into foreclosure, at least the attorney allegedly representing the town would do that,
[40:49.520 --> 41:01.520]  but the same firm would also sue the town itself in its own name if there was a prior existing conference. So the town would be the plaintiff and one of the defendants.
[41:01.520 --> 41:06.520]  Stop me if this sounds irrational.
[41:06.520 --> 41:08.520]  But basically what else...
[41:08.520 --> 41:14.520]  I would stop you, but I'm too confused to know what kind of question to ask.
[41:14.520 --> 41:24.520]  Anyway, it gets even better. It turns out a lot of this property is basically property that nobody wants, so guess who the first bidder on some of these properties were?
[41:24.520 --> 41:36.520]  The town. So the town basically, you know, the attorney's firm will file suit, push these properties into foreclosure, and by the way, in a lot of cases, refuse payment and or go after nonprofits.
[41:36.520 --> 41:45.520]  And then after suing itself using its own firm, then it will basically place the first bid on the property at foreclose done.
[41:45.520 --> 42:01.520]  So long story short, a lot of people, pro se, decided we've had enough of this and they started filing counter claims and suits and basically motions to open.
[42:01.520 --> 42:03.520]  So how is that working for?
[42:03.520 --> 42:11.520]  It's working pretty good. They got one plagiarized motion to reopen, managed to get one of the cases reopened.
[42:11.520 --> 42:22.520]  I guess the person impersonating the town attorney is a little bit PO'd and this person will do anything but answer the allegation that they are not, in fact, the real town attorney.
[42:22.520 --> 42:28.520]  Have they bar grieved this firm on a regular basis?
[42:28.520 --> 42:39.520]  No, not yet, but some of them did file Freedom of Information Act requests and the response back was, nope, the town attorney is this guy, not this other person.
[42:39.520 --> 42:42.520]  And that came directly from the town.
[42:42.520 --> 42:50.520]  So this guy's claiming to be a town attorney and the town is saying he's not?
[42:50.520 --> 42:56.520]  The town is saying this other person is the actual town attorney with the authority to do this.
[42:56.520 --> 43:01.520]  So this guy's claiming the authority to collect the debt he doesn't have authority to collect?
[43:01.520 --> 43:05.520]  Yeah, and file suit in the name of the town.
[43:05.520 --> 43:17.520]  Yeah, there's about, I think, four right now that are impending litigation, either as defendants with counter claims or people filing stuff to get things open or people just suing outright.
[43:17.520 --> 43:20.520]  I believe there's going to be another 12.
[43:20.520 --> 43:24.520]  If they're claiming an authority they don't have, that's fraud.
[43:24.520 --> 43:28.520]  Yeah, and it's quote-warrant-toe, believe it or not.
[43:28.520 --> 43:34.520]  I don't want a person to decide to get all uppity and file a quote-warrant-toe counter claim.
[43:34.520 --> 43:38.520]  Well, a quote-warrant-toe is an action to remove the public official.
[43:38.520 --> 43:42.520]  It looks like these guys weren't public officials to start with.
[43:42.520 --> 43:45.520]  Oh, exactly, and the great thing about Connecticut...
[43:45.520 --> 43:55.520]  Hang on, Dan, we're back for the break. This is Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig, beautiful radio, our call in number is 512-646-1984.
[43:55.520 --> 44:18.520]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[44:25.520 --> 44:27.520]  And now you can too.
[44:27.520 --> 44:33.520]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.520 --> 44:42.520]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.520 --> 44:51.520]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, prose tactics, and much more.
[44:51.520 --> 45:00.520]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:00.520 --> 45:09.520]  The Oklahoma City bombing, top 10 reasons to question the official story, reason number one, John Doe number two, and other accomplices.
[45:09.520 --> 45:16.520]  On the day of the bombing, nearly all of the witnesses that saw Tim McVeigh and the Ryder truck report that he was accompanied by other perpetrators.
[45:16.520 --> 45:24.520]  The FBI and federal prosecutors insist that Tim McVeigh alone delivered the Ryder truck bomb to the Murr Building and detonated it.
[45:24.520 --> 45:32.520]  The only witness the government produced to place McVeigh at the building that morning, Dana Bradley, who lost her children and one of her legs in the bombing,
[45:32.520 --> 45:38.520]  testified that she saw McVeigh with another man, the fateful John Doe number two, exiting the Ryder truck.
[45:38.520 --> 45:50.520]  While at least 15 other witnesses claim to have seen McVeigh with other perpetrators the day of the bombing, no less than 226 witnesses placed him with other men in the days before the bombing,
[45:50.520 --> 45:56.520]  including when he rented the Ryder truck, and in some cases had positively identified the other perpetrators.
[45:56.520 --> 46:25.520]  For more information, please visit okcbombingtruth.com.
[46:25.520 --> 46:31.520]  Hi folks, we are back. This is Brutal Law Radio. This is our Friday night for our marathon.
[46:31.520 --> 46:35.520]  We have just a little over an hour left in the show.
[46:35.520 --> 46:40.520]  Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[46:40.520 --> 46:46.520]  Right now, we are taking your calls. We have Dan in Connecticut. Dan, please continue.
[46:46.520 --> 46:56.520]  Yeah, the wonderful thing about Quaranto in Connecticut is it's basically a tool to punish anybody who usurps any public or private franchise.
[46:56.520 --> 47:05.520]  So in other words, if I showed up in Connecticut and I claimed to be the local dog catcher, I don't even have to be the local dog catcher.
[47:05.520 --> 47:14.520]  But if I claim to be the local dog catcher and I start catching dogs, someone gets P.O. that I have caught their dog and thrown at my van and dragged it off to the pound.
[47:14.520 --> 47:18.520]  They could sue me in the nature of Quaranto.
[47:18.520 --> 47:26.520]  So in Connecticut, I checked it out after one of these people started doing it and I was like, wow, they've got so much.
[47:26.520 --> 47:35.520]  And it's amazing because it's just one medium-sized town and it's a nice decent cluster of people all getting P.O. that wanted their name.
[47:35.520 --> 47:43.520]  Oh, so Quaranto in Connecticut is not just a matter of removing a public official.
[47:43.520 --> 47:44.520]  No.
[47:44.520 --> 47:58.520]  It sounds like it's a tool sort of like 18 U.S. Code 240, like the Ku Klux Klan Act, 42 U.S. Code 1983 that authorizes you to file suit against the public official.
[47:58.520 --> 48:01.520]  Yeah, or somebody claiming to be one.
[48:01.520 --> 48:16.520]  The 18 U.S. Code 242 and 42 U.S. Code 1983 goes to either acting as a public official or acting under the color of a public official in pretense.
[48:16.520 --> 48:19.520]  And there's another brilliant thing about doing that.
[48:19.520 --> 48:30.520]  The burden of proof is on the defendant to say, like the dog catcher analogy, the burden of proof, like let's just say I did that, would be to prove not only was I appointed or elected
[48:30.520 --> 48:35.520]  or hired to be the dog catcher, but I had authority to do what I did in the office of dog catcher.
[48:35.520 --> 48:37.520]  Yeah, exactly.
[48:37.520 --> 48:39.520]  That's what we were talking about earlier.
[48:39.520 --> 48:48.520]  When someone makes a claim of authority to take a particular act, you don't have to prove they don't have the authority.
[48:48.520 --> 48:50.520]  They have to prove they do.
[48:50.520 --> 48:53.520]  So that's great.
[48:53.520 --> 48:55.520]  We're going to go after them.
[48:55.520 --> 49:01.520]  Awesome thing is these are all tax foreclosures. I mean, I was those reasons some of the stuff these guys are using.
[49:01.520 --> 49:09.520]  And basically in Connecticut, anyway, the way Connecticut law addresses it is foreclosure is an equitable action.
[49:09.520 --> 49:15.520]  So basically you have to proceed according to the rules of equity, which is different than legal or common law remedy.
[49:15.520 --> 49:19.520]  And in Connecticut, we have this thing called the clean hands doctrine.
[49:19.520 --> 49:30.520]  In other words, you have to show that like you didn't engage in this or the lead up to this is a dirty, filthy rotten bastard with the plan to rack up your attorney fees.
[49:30.520 --> 49:37.520]  In other words, you know, you can't take property if somebody has tried to pay you.
[49:37.520 --> 49:38.520]  Yes.
[49:38.520 --> 49:45.520]  Okay, because payment to payment offered and refused is payment tender.
[49:45.520 --> 49:53.520]  Okay, Ken just wrote me a note that this that's something I forgot about that can also call war to it can also be used in a corporation.
[49:53.520 --> 50:00.520]  So a corporation when a board member is challenged about authority to sit.
[50:00.520 --> 50:08.520]  That raises the question of who has tended to bring a core war to action in a close luncheon.
[50:08.520 --> 50:19.520]  Okay, the stockholder in a corporation can bring a core war to to remove a board member from the corporation.
[50:19.520 --> 50:21.520]  Just a little an aside.
[50:21.520 --> 50:28.520]  Oh, yeah, I mean, I know Connecticut is the private franchise part of that statute is is inclusive of that.
[50:28.520 --> 50:34.520]  You know, but basically whether public or private, I mean, you know, and that's just one instance.
[50:34.520 --> 50:41.520]  I mean, there's there's a whole bunch of things these people are using just to like, and it's basically what it boils down to this.
[50:41.520 --> 50:46.520]  It's a bunch of people, you know, the few nonprofit people are like, look, we're nonprofit.
[50:46.520 --> 50:47.520]  What are you doing?
[50:47.520 --> 50:48.520]  We're recognized by the state.
[50:48.520 --> 50:50.520]  We're recognized by the IRS.
[50:50.520 --> 50:52.520]  We just want to provide affordable housing.
[50:52.520 --> 51:05.520]  And basically, this one attorney and, you know, the city basically got to the point of like scaring elderly and disabled people out of their homes with 99 year releases.
[51:05.520 --> 51:10.520]  Which is how did he scare them out of their homes?
[51:10.520 --> 51:16.520]  Well, basically, they showed up and said, you got to get out.
[51:16.520 --> 51:23.520]  I mean, which was kind of like, you know, this, I mean, that part of it goes to like, you know, just different civil rights stuff.
[51:23.520 --> 51:27.520]  But for the other people, they would refuse to take payment.
[51:27.520 --> 51:28.520]  They refuse to work on a plan.
[51:28.520 --> 51:31.520]  I mean, they used to do that in this particular town.
[51:31.520 --> 51:38.520]  But once this one attorney started following all these actions, it was basically like, pay everything now or we're just going to take your land.
[51:38.520 --> 51:44.520]  And people would offer payment and the town would basically be instructed by this person you serve in the office.
[51:44.520 --> 51:46.520]  No, don't take the payment.
[51:46.520 --> 51:48.520]  We're going to steal the land.
[51:48.520 --> 51:55.520]  And of course, then a depressed real estate market, who's going to buy it and who would want to buy land in the town where this is going on?
[51:55.520 --> 51:56.520]  Exactly.
[51:56.520 --> 52:02.520]  And believe it or not, some of the land being taken, like I know a few parcels that I've been told about.
[52:02.520 --> 52:09.520]  Believe it or not, those are parcels of land purchased from the town from tax foreclosures filed by this attorney.
[52:09.520 --> 52:16.520]  So it's kind of like, you know, it's kind of like catch and release almost.
[52:16.520 --> 52:22.520]  Oh, so they, they sold the property and they take it for no taxes.
[52:22.520 --> 52:24.520]  And then they, but I missed a part of that.
[52:24.520 --> 52:25.520]  I didn't understand that.
[52:25.520 --> 52:29.520]  But basically a few of these, they, they took property, they sold it for no taxes.
[52:29.520 --> 52:34.520]  And then they did the same thing with the person that bought it.
[52:34.520 --> 52:37.520]  They wouldn't let him pay for it and then took it back from it?
[52:37.520 --> 52:47.520]  Or in the process of trying on a few of them, a few of them again, basically the law firm would push the property into a foreclosure suit, tell the tax, you know, take the taxes.
[52:47.520 --> 52:56.520]  And then basically with the, with the preexisting liens, you know, they would basically file suit in the name of the town against the town as a co-defendant.
[52:56.520 --> 53:02.520]  Do you have anything in Connecticut on phone meeting litigation?
[53:02.520 --> 53:06.520]  Not very much, but, but I know some people are using that.
[53:06.520 --> 53:09.520]  I believe they call it vexatious litigation.
[53:09.520 --> 53:12.520]  Yeah, this sounds like a form of baritry.
[53:12.520 --> 53:13.520]  Yeah.
[53:13.520 --> 53:16.520]  I think somebody might have mentioned that.
[53:16.520 --> 53:21.520]  This is why they appear to be creating their own litigation.
[53:21.520 --> 53:22.520]  Yeah.
[53:22.520 --> 53:28.520]  And it's, and it's, and it's very interesting because I know like some illusion you didn't have.
[53:28.520 --> 53:37.520]  But yeah, it's getting very interesting, but I'm surprised at how effective some of these pro-says are getting at fighting back.
[53:37.520 --> 53:39.520]  Wonderful, isn't that?
[53:39.520 --> 53:47.520]  Well, one thing the internet is really helping that people can actually get out there and find the information that they need.
[53:47.520 --> 53:56.520]  Yeah, I would help point some of them in the right direction and say like, hey, you know, I can't give you legal advice, but check this out.
[53:56.520 --> 54:02.520]  You know, so by proxy, you've created a lot of monsters.
[54:02.520 --> 54:20.520]  I've been preparing some pretty serious legal documents and frankly, just going on to the internet and doing the simple word search has pretty well helped me find most everything I needed.
[54:20.520 --> 54:30.520]  You know, we have Lexis and Westlaw, but, you know, they're a little more focused, but I'm doing all right with what I got.
[54:30.520 --> 54:31.520]  Oh, yeah.
[54:31.520 --> 54:33.520]  Just, you know, through the scholar.
[54:33.520 --> 54:39.520]  And the restricted site search for Connecticut case law, I mean, maybe you don't have a Lexis or your Westlaw.
[54:39.520 --> 54:45.520]  So what you can do is you go to your favorite start engine, like, you know, type in the term, like, ab initio or something like that.
[54:45.520 --> 54:53.520]  Or, you know, subject matter jurisdiction space and then type in site colon period dot j u d dot Connecticut dot gov.
[54:53.520 --> 54:59.520]  And that will pull up a lot of appellants report cases.
[54:59.520 --> 55:01.520]  It was a lot like that.
[55:01.520 --> 55:05.520]  To wherever you're at, one thing to know about the search engines.
[55:05.520 --> 55:09.520]  They will tend to search from where you're at.
[55:09.520 --> 55:11.520]  You know, I'm in Texas.
[55:11.520 --> 55:12.520]  I do a search.
[55:12.520 --> 55:13.520]  I get Texas hits.
[55:13.520 --> 55:18.520]  When I'm in Australia and did a search, I got hits from Australia.
[55:18.520 --> 55:23.520]  Essentially, if I was in New South Wales, Australia, I got hits from New South Wales, Australia.
[55:23.520 --> 55:26.520]  I didn't get it from all over.
[55:26.520 --> 55:39.520]  So one of the things I am having a little difficulty with is getting doing a search in taxes for case law in New York.
[55:39.520 --> 55:49.520]  It wants to find, I guess they restrict the crawlers to geographical areas, but a pretty well overcome that with Google Scholar.
[55:49.520 --> 55:52.520]  Google Scholar is pretty good.
[55:52.520 --> 55:54.520]  It gets me full cases.
[55:54.520 --> 55:55.520]  Yeah.
[55:55.520 --> 56:00.520]  I don't want to cut you short, but I know you've got cars and there's one more thing I wanted to address since you had that last call,
[56:00.520 --> 56:02.520]  bring up the commercial admiralty stuff again.
[56:02.520 --> 56:08.520]  One thing I've heard from people, and this is total garbage, obviously, is that when you file motions with the
[56:08.520 --> 56:13.520]  court or you have a driver's license or all this stuff, you have formed a contract.
[56:13.520 --> 56:16.520]  Well, let's just dispense with this right away.
[56:16.520 --> 56:19.520]  In order to form a contract, you need a meeting of the minds.
[56:19.520 --> 56:21.520]  Meeting of the minds doesn't happen.
[56:21.520 --> 56:22.520]  You don't have a contract.
[56:22.520 --> 56:26.520]  Then there's the issues of a losery promise.
[56:26.520 --> 56:33.520]  If you don't have a promise or a consummation, obviously, you don't have a contract to enforce.
[56:33.520 --> 56:37.520]  Then there's the question of fraud, which everybody likes to bring up.
[56:37.520 --> 56:40.520]  Obviously, if it's fraud, that's not enforceable either.
[56:40.520 --> 56:42.520]  Then there's duress, especially in criminal cases.
[56:42.520 --> 56:45.520]  They make you come there and they make you do stuff.
[56:45.520 --> 56:48.520]  Obviously, you don't have a contract either.
[56:48.520 --> 56:55.520]  I just figured I'd want to throw that out just in case anybody wanted to call in later and bring that admiralty aspect of it up.
[56:55.520 --> 56:57.520]  Yes.
[56:57.520 --> 57:00.520]  Okay, do you have anything else for us, Dan?
[57:00.520 --> 57:01.520]  No, that's it.
[57:01.520 --> 57:07.520]  I'm going to go let my voice recover since it's blown out, but I do want to touch base with you sometime tomorrow or Sunday.
[57:07.520 --> 57:09.520]  Good. Sunday would be better.
[57:09.520 --> 57:14.520]  I'll be traveling tomorrow, but Sunday I'll be settled.
[57:14.520 --> 57:17.520]  Give me a call then. We'll talk.
[57:17.520 --> 57:19.520]  Oh, definitely. Definitely.
[57:19.520 --> 57:24.520]  I probably should do it Sunday because tomorrow's my anniversary and I'll die a horrible death if I do.
[57:24.520 --> 57:27.520]  Okay. Don't forget your anniversary.
[57:27.520 --> 57:32.520]  No. I forgot our 30th anniversary.
[57:32.520 --> 57:38.520]  I told her, how do you expect somebody to remember something that happened that long ago?
[57:38.520 --> 57:40.520]  Oh, no.
[57:40.520 --> 57:44.520]  She was not understanding.
[57:44.520 --> 57:46.520]  I don't know why.
[57:46.520 --> 57:48.520]  I don't either.
[57:48.520 --> 57:52.520]  Us poor guys were so mistreated.
[57:52.520 --> 57:56.520]  I spelled her name wrong once on a card.
[57:56.520 --> 58:01.520]  She did not find any humor in that.
[58:01.520 --> 58:12.520]  I have this problem that women tend to find, tend not to find it as funny as I do.
[58:12.520 --> 58:14.520]  All right. Well, you take it easy.
[58:14.520 --> 58:17.520]  Okay. Thank you for calling, Dan.
[58:17.520 --> 58:20.520]  This is Dr. The Great.
[58:20.520 --> 58:26.520]  This is Dr. The Great. We have a radio call in board. It's kind of slack.
[58:26.520 --> 58:35.520]  So if you have any questions or comments, give us a call at 512-646-1984.
[58:35.520 --> 58:39.520]  Ask us some good, hard questions.
[58:39.520 --> 58:43.520]  Mental stress disease.
[58:43.520 --> 58:45.520]  Okay. Hang in there.
[58:45.520 --> 58:50.520]  Let's go to the other side.
[59:16.520 --> 59:19.520]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:19.520 --> 59:23.520]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:23.520 --> 59:28.520]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:28.520 --> 59:32.520]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:32.520 --> 59:38.520]  providing an entrance into the riches of the word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.520 --> 59:43.520]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:43.520 --> 59:53.520]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:53.520 --> 59:57.520]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.520 --> 01:00:00.520]  That's freestudybible.com.
[01:00:00.520 --> 01:00:04.520]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[01:00:04.520 --> 01:00:11.520]  The Wall Street Journal reported Friday the CIA has quietly tightened its rules on drone strikes in Pakistan
[01:00:11.520 --> 01:00:15.520]  over concerns there are worsening relations with Islamabad,
[01:00:15.520 --> 01:00:18.520]  while establishing new rules to minimize diplomatic blowback,
[01:00:18.520 --> 01:00:23.520]  a new high-level review reaffirmed support for the drone program,
[01:00:23.520 --> 01:00:25.520]  which has killed thousands of civilians.
[01:00:25.520 --> 01:00:29.520]  Officially, the CIA does not acknowledge conducting drone strikes.
[01:00:29.520 --> 01:00:35.520]  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered an investigation
[01:00:35.520 --> 01:00:39.520]  into leaks of plans to attack Iran's nuclear facilities.
[01:00:39.520 --> 01:00:46.520]  The Kuwaiti newspaper Al Jarrida reports the main suspects are the former head of Mossad,
[01:00:46.520 --> 01:00:53.520]  Mir Dagan, and Yuval Diskin, head of Shin Bet, Israel's foreign and domestic spy agencies.
[01:00:53.520 --> 01:00:58.520]  In January, the recently retired Dagan called an attack on Iran,
[01:00:58.520 --> 01:01:02.520]  quote, the stupidest idea I've ever heard.
[01:01:02.520 --> 01:01:09.520]  NATO forces are to be investigated by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes during the Libyan conflict.
[01:01:09.520 --> 01:01:17.520]  Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo said Tuesday NATO troops would be investigated alongside rebel soldiers
[01:01:17.520 --> 01:01:23.520]  and regime forces for alleged breaches of the laws of war during the battle to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi.
[01:01:23.520 --> 01:01:30.520]  The U.S. Energy Department said Friday the global output of heat-trapping carbon dioxide
[01:01:30.520 --> 01:01:35.520]  jumped by a record 6% between 2009 and 2010.
[01:01:35.520 --> 01:01:39.520]  Greg Marlin, professor of geology at Appalachian State University,
[01:01:39.520 --> 01:01:46.520]  called the 564 million additional tons of carbon a, quote, monster increase.
[01:01:46.520 --> 01:01:49.520]  Half the emissions came from the U.S. and China.
[01:01:49.520 --> 01:01:55.520]  Carbon emissions from coal, the largest source of worldwide emissions, jumped nearly 8%.
[01:01:55.520 --> 01:02:03.520]  In 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said the rate of warming would be based on the rate of pollution.
[01:02:03.520 --> 01:02:09.520]  They forecast global temperatures rising between 4 and 11 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of the century.
[01:02:09.520 --> 01:02:14.520]  However, the latest figures are higher than the worst-case scenario.
[01:02:14.520 --> 01:02:21.520]  Press TV reports at least 127 people have been killed in separate U.S. drone strikes
[01:02:21.520 --> 01:02:26.520]  in Somalia and Pakistan's northwestern tribal region over the past two days.
[01:02:26.520 --> 01:02:35.520]  On Thursday, 41 people were killed and 33 injured in a U.S. drone attack on the outskirts of Homeboy in Somalia's southern region.
[01:02:35.520 --> 01:02:41.520]  The attack followed a U.S. strike against Jamam, killing at least 28 and injuring dozens more.
[01:02:41.520 --> 01:02:46.520]  In Pakistan, at least three people were killed in a U.S. drone attack in North Waziristan.
[01:02:46.520 --> 01:02:51.520]  On Wednesday, U.S. drones attacked villages in central Somalia.
[01:04:16.520 --> 01:04:19.520]  This is something we're going to discuss at the beginning of the show,
[01:04:19.520 --> 01:04:26.520]  which is this article dealing with these idiotic county prosecutors out of Harris County, which is Houston, Texas,
[01:04:26.520 --> 01:04:33.520]  and their inability to stay out of the middle of the grand jury room
[01:04:33.520 --> 01:04:37.520]  and trying to get their hands-on transcripts from the grand jury.
[01:04:37.520 --> 01:04:47.520]  All right. Now, besides these two assistant district parties,
[01:04:47.520 --> 01:04:51.520]  one of which is Carl Hobbs and the other is Steve Morris,
[01:04:51.520 --> 01:05:00.520]  we have the issue of Judge Susan Brown bringing these two back into her court to hold them in contempt.
[01:05:00.520 --> 01:05:04.520]  Now, while we're sitting here holding these guys in contempt,
[01:05:04.520 --> 01:05:07.520]  I want to know why she simply didn't just throw them in jail,
[01:05:07.520 --> 01:05:14.520]  because if they have the information showing that these two individuals attempted to get the transcripts from the grand jury room
[01:05:14.520 --> 01:05:20.520]  and in fact did get them, then what is there to hold a contempt hearing about?
[01:05:20.520 --> 01:05:24.520]  The idiots have the evidence in their hands.
[01:05:24.520 --> 01:05:30.520]  Randy, are you there?
[01:05:30.520 --> 01:05:35.520]  Okay. I'm assuming Randy cannot hear me, though we can hear him.
[01:05:35.520 --> 01:05:42.520]  Okay. That being said, I'm going to go into and read this article to you.
[01:05:42.520 --> 01:05:46.520]  It's a pretty interesting article. It's fairly short.
[01:05:46.520 --> 01:05:54.520]  But two Harris County prosecutors are facing contempt charges after a judge learned that members of the district attorney's office
[01:05:54.520 --> 01:06:00.520]  were given information that may contain transcripts from secret proceedings of a grand jury
[01:06:00.520 --> 01:06:04.520]  that is investigating the office's court records show.
[01:06:04.520 --> 01:06:08.520]  Assistant District Attorney's Carl Hobbs, Chief of the Grand Jury Division,
[01:06:08.520 --> 01:06:12.520]  and Steve Morris, Chief of the Government Integrity Bureau,
[01:06:12.520 --> 01:06:20.520]  along with two court reporters have been summoned to appear before Judge Susan Brown's court at 9 a.m. Monday.
[01:06:20.520 --> 01:06:25.520]  It has now come to this court's attention that members of the Harris County District Attorney's office
[01:06:25.520 --> 01:06:30.520]  may be in possession of official transcripts of testimony from witnesses
[01:06:30.520 --> 01:06:36.520]  who appeared before the Harris County Grand Jury for the 185th District Court August term,
[01:06:36.520 --> 01:06:42.520]  according to a motion issued by Brown and obtained by the Houston Chronicle on Tuesday.
[01:06:42.520 --> 01:06:48.520]  In recent weeks, Brown had not only issued an order denying prosecutors access to the grand jury,
[01:06:48.520 --> 01:06:53.520]  but also disqualified the DA's office from participating in the grand jury's investigation
[01:06:53.520 --> 01:06:58.520]  of possible criminal conduct by members of the district attorney's office.
[01:06:58.520 --> 01:07:02.520]  According to the latest motion requiring the fore to attend the hearing,
[01:07:02.520 --> 01:07:07.520]  the prosecutors and court reporters must show why they should not be held in contempt
[01:07:07.520 --> 01:07:11.520]  and sanctioned by the court for violating Brown's orders.
[01:07:11.520 --> 01:07:14.520]  Now, let me get this straight to you here.
[01:07:14.520 --> 01:07:18.520]  There are two prosecutors, two assistant DA's,
[01:07:18.520 --> 01:07:24.520]  and there are two court reporters that took these transcripts for the grand jury
[01:07:24.520 --> 01:07:33.520]  and turned them over to these two assistant district attorneys in direct violation of the judge's order.
[01:07:33.520 --> 01:07:39.520]  Now, this is a problem. This is a really big problem.
[01:07:39.520 --> 01:07:45.520]  Why are these two court reporters doing the bidding of the two assistant DA's
[01:07:45.520 --> 01:07:52.520]  when they know there's a court order in effect denying these DA's access to the grand jury at all
[01:07:52.520 --> 01:07:56.520]  in any way, shape, or form?
[01:07:56.520 --> 01:07:58.520]  Now, back to the article.
[01:07:58.520 --> 01:08:02.520]  Some local defense attorneys expressed shock that members of the DA's office
[01:08:02.520 --> 01:08:06.520]  may have violated the judge's orders and the directives of the grand jury,
[01:08:06.520 --> 01:08:11.520]  whose proceedings are generally so confidential that even witnesses are not allowed to bring
[01:08:11.520 --> 01:08:15.520]  their defense attorneys into the room while giving testimony.
[01:08:15.520 --> 01:08:21.520]  If it is proven to be true, it is absolutely a flagrant violation of the sanctity of the secrecy
[01:08:21.520 --> 01:08:26.520]  of the grand jury, said Murray Newman, a defense attorney and former Harris County prosecutor
[01:08:26.520 --> 01:08:30.520]  who writes a blog on the Harris County Criminal Justice Center.
[01:08:30.520 --> 01:08:35.520]  Newman also said he was stunned that prosecutors might have tried to unlawfully obtain transcripts
[01:08:35.520 --> 01:08:39.520]  of the grand jury that is investigating the DA's office.
[01:08:39.520 --> 01:08:43.520]  It's like a guy robbing a liquor store with a cop standing outside, he said.
[01:08:43.520 --> 01:08:45.520]  It's just stupid.
[01:08:45.520 --> 01:08:49.520]  Officials with the DA's office declined to comment on the possible contempt charges,
[01:08:49.520 --> 01:08:51.520]  which were misdemeanor crimes.
[01:08:51.520 --> 01:08:56.520]  What I want to know before we continue with this article is why is a contempt charge
[01:08:56.520 --> 01:09:00.520]  the only charge being levied against these two DA's?
[01:09:00.520 --> 01:09:05.520]  The DA's office itself, going after these people for setting up the DA's office
[01:09:05.520 --> 01:09:10.520]  to be put into this light and discredited in this fashion.
[01:09:10.520 --> 01:09:15.520]  If I was acting as a district attorney and two of the people that worked for me pulled this stunt,
[01:09:15.520 --> 01:09:21.520]  not only would they be out looking for a job, they'd be facing criminal charges to boot.
[01:09:21.520 --> 01:09:29.520]  And I would certainly find a way to make sure they faced a whole lot more than a misdemeanor charge.
[01:09:29.520 --> 01:09:36.520]  Because if they obtained these records illegally, that's tampering with a government record.
[01:09:36.520 --> 01:09:38.520]  That's a felony.
[01:09:38.520 --> 01:09:43.520]  And I would certainly make sure that charge was brought to bear.
[01:09:43.520 --> 01:09:49.520]  But again, if we expect the DA's in Texas to do anything about prosecuting their own,
[01:09:49.520 --> 01:09:53.520]  I think we're pretty much living in La La Land.
[01:09:53.520 --> 01:09:59.520]  Now, let's talk about the rest of the article here where it's talking about the Houston Police Department and the DA.
[01:09:59.520 --> 01:10:04.520]  Suspicions by defense attorneys involved in the case and court records have indicated
[01:10:04.520 --> 01:10:10.520]  that the grand jury's investigation centered on issues surrounding the Houston Police Department's
[01:10:10.520 --> 01:10:17.520]  troubled breath alcohol testing vehicles known as bat vans and possibly the DA's office's involvement.
[01:10:17.520 --> 01:10:23.520]  Defense lawyers and former HPD crime lab supervisors have raised concerns about the integrity of results
[01:10:23.520 --> 01:10:29.520]  from tests performed in HPD's bat vans, which experienced problems such as overheating
[01:10:29.520 --> 01:10:35.520]  that could potentially compromise evidence in dozens of DWI cases.
[01:10:35.520 --> 01:10:40.520]  When defense attorney Brent Meyer, a critic of the vans, was called to testify October 18,
[01:10:40.520 --> 01:10:46.520]  the grand jury ejected Hobbs and Morris along with the general counsel from the DA's office, John Barnhill.
[01:10:46.520 --> 01:10:51.520]  Threatening to have the bailiff arrest them if they did not leave according to court records.
[01:10:51.520 --> 01:10:58.520]  Brown, who is the judge, who impaneled the grand jury, refused prosecutors' pleas to be present during the testimony.
[01:10:58.520 --> 01:11:02.520]  Her ruling was upheld by the 14th Court of Appeals in Houston.
[01:11:02.520 --> 01:11:04.520]  Two attorneys assisting.
[01:11:04.520 --> 01:11:09.520]  In a subsequent order disqualifying the DA's office from the grand jury's investigation,
[01:11:09.520 --> 01:11:14.520]  the judge also granted the grand jury's request for a temporary special prosecutor.
[01:11:14.520 --> 01:11:20.520]  She appointed attorney Stephen C. St. Martin and James Mount to assist the panel.
[01:11:20.520 --> 01:11:23.520]  Both are former veteran assistant district attorneys.
[01:11:23.520 --> 01:11:30.520]  Chip Lewis, an attorney representing a former HPD crime lab supervisor who testified before the grand jury last month,
[01:11:30.520 --> 01:11:35.520]  said Brown's latest motion shows that the court is concerned with prosecutors circumventing the grand's,
[01:11:35.520 --> 01:11:41.520]  meaning the grand jury's, directive for the DA's office to stay out of the secret proceedings.
[01:11:41.520 --> 01:11:48.520]  They were ordered out of the grand jury on the threat of arrest, said Lewis, who also was formerly a prosecutor.
[01:11:48.520 --> 01:11:53.520]  For them to turn around and attempt to get the transcript flies in the face of the grand jury.
[01:11:53.520 --> 01:12:00.520]  If the prosecutors or court reporters Javier Lille and Catherine Chagallis are found guilty of the contempt charges,
[01:12:00.520 --> 01:12:04.520]  they could face up to a $500 fine up to six months in jail.
[01:12:04.520 --> 01:12:11.520]  Guess what? Not fricking good enough. Not good enough.
[01:12:11.520 --> 01:12:19.520]  These court reporters and district attorneys that knowingly and willfully violate the law should be charged with a heck of a lot more
[01:12:19.520 --> 01:12:24.520]  than a stupid misdemeanor slap on the wrist.
[01:12:24.520 --> 01:12:30.520]  Every time a dead-blame public servant violates their oath of office and the rights of the people,
[01:12:30.520 --> 01:12:37.520]  anything associated with the duties of their office, it should be at a minimum a state jail felony.
[01:12:37.520 --> 01:12:40.520]  At an absolute minimum.
[01:12:40.520 --> 01:12:49.520]  But then again, if that were the case, most of our legislators would stick to that same web and wind up in jail themselves.
[01:12:49.520 --> 01:12:55.520]  It's the reason for the puny ways they go about prosecuting other public servants.
[01:12:55.520 --> 01:12:59.520]  They don't want to get caught up in the same mix of responsibility.
[01:12:59.520 --> 01:13:01.520]  Randy, are you back and can hear me?
[01:13:01.520 --> 01:13:05.520]  Yeah, I'm back. I had to reboot everything.
[01:13:05.520 --> 01:13:09.520]  But, you know, this is my area as a grand jury and I agree.
[01:13:09.520 --> 01:13:14.520]  This should be considered extremely serious.
[01:13:14.520 --> 01:13:24.520]  I guess this goes to the whole structure of our checks and balances, our ability to control our government.
[01:13:24.520 --> 01:13:35.520]  And Ken and I are working on legislation to reinforce the grand jury,
[01:13:35.520 --> 01:13:46.520]  where we were going to ask for legislation to require that the grand jury sits to hear private citizen complaints
[01:13:46.520 --> 01:13:55.520]  so that the prosecuting attorneys no longer get to feel like they own and control our grand juries.
[01:13:55.520 --> 01:14:00.520]  The grand jury is only there to protect us from the prosecutor.
[01:14:00.520 --> 01:14:09.520]  And this looks like a case where the prosecutor is doing everything he can to overcome that check and balance.
[01:14:09.520 --> 01:14:16.520]  I guess we have to expect it. There's always been this push and pull.
[01:14:16.520 --> 01:14:22.520]  Anyone in a position of power tends to want to increase his power.
[01:14:22.520 --> 01:14:28.520]  And prosecutors want to have prosecutorial discretion.
[01:14:28.520 --> 01:14:43.520]  Although I can't find it in the statute and just look at the statute today that says that there is no place in the case law on prosecutors having discretion.
[01:14:43.520 --> 01:14:47.520]  It's not in the statute and there's been no case law addressing it.
[01:14:47.520 --> 01:14:53.520]  That's what this one case specifically stated. Well, there needs to be case law addressing it.
[01:14:53.520 --> 01:14:59.520]  The statutes are clear that when a prosecutor is made known that a crime has been committed,
[01:14:59.520 --> 01:15:03.520]  he's to present the complaints to a grand jury.
[01:15:03.520 --> 01:15:05.520]  That's what the Constitution says.
[01:15:05.520 --> 01:15:09.520]  That felonies and misdemeanors are subject to indictment.
[01:15:09.520 --> 01:15:15.520]  That the prosecutor was not supposed to make the determination of whether or not to prosecute.
[01:15:15.520 --> 01:15:18.520]  That's what grand juries were for.
[01:15:18.520 --> 01:15:24.520]  And grand juries are only there to protect us from the prosecutor.
[01:15:24.520 --> 01:15:27.520]  So I think we should hang them up by their thumbs.
[01:15:27.520 --> 01:15:32.520]  Or at the very least go warrant a removal from office.
[01:15:32.520 --> 01:15:35.520]  That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
[01:15:35.520 --> 01:15:40.520]  Well, we already have the presumption that these guys are crooks simply because they're attorneys.
[01:15:40.520 --> 01:15:47.520]  I think we should doubly believe they're felonious crooks just because they're prosecuting attorneys.
[01:15:47.520 --> 01:15:50.520]  Well, I tend to agree with that.
[01:15:50.520 --> 01:15:57.520]  And, you know, on the one hand, you can kind of understand the prosecutor's position that, you know, he's there to prosecute.
[01:15:57.520 --> 01:16:05.520]  And I think that's why the legislature, when they enacted the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
[01:16:05.520 --> 01:16:15.520]  under Chapter 2, Duties of Officers, 2.01, the very first one.
[01:16:15.520 --> 01:16:23.520]  It shall be the primary duty of the prosecuting attorney not to secure conviction,
[01:16:23.520 --> 01:16:27.520]  but to ensure that justice is served.
[01:16:27.520 --> 01:16:33.520]  You shall not seek witnesses or evidence and show the insincere accusers to mitigate the guilt of the accused.
[01:16:33.520 --> 01:16:39.520]  That's because they understood the tendency to move toward vigorous prosecution
[01:16:39.520 --> 01:16:43.520]  without regard to whether the person was the inner sinner or not.
[01:16:43.520 --> 01:16:50.520]  And that's exactly the primary duty of the place, to protect us from that vigorous prosecution.
[01:16:50.520 --> 01:17:00.520]  This is where the California Department of Justice did a break, move on radio, give us a call, 512-646-1984.
[01:17:00.520 --> 01:17:07.520]  Capital Corn and Bullion is a family-owned and operated business that has helped many families and friends in protecting their assets.
[01:17:07.520 --> 01:17:09.520]  And we would like to do the same for you.
[01:17:09.520 --> 01:17:14.520]  In addition to Coins and Bullion, we now offer Patriot Saves, ammunition,
[01:17:14.520 --> 01:17:19.520]  Berkey Water Products, gift certificates, wristbands, and our new Silver Pool,
[01:17:19.520 --> 01:17:23.520]  a new way to guarantee silver by prepaying at a locked price.
[01:17:23.520 --> 01:17:27.520]  We can even help you set up a metals IRA account.
[01:17:27.520 --> 01:17:32.520]  Call us at 512-646-640 for more details.
[01:17:32.520 --> 01:17:39.520]  As always, we buy, sell, and trade precious metals and cater to those with all sizes of coin collections.
[01:17:39.520 --> 01:17:45.520]  We're located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, about a half a mile north of Canaan,
[01:17:45.520 --> 01:17:49.520]  next to the Ikiban Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[01:17:49.520 --> 01:17:53.520]  We're open Monday through Friday 10-6, Saturdays 10-5.
[01:17:53.520 --> 01:18:00.520]  Visit us at CapitalCornandBullion.com or call 512-646-640.
[01:18:00.520 --> 01:18:04.520]  If you entered into a mortgage agreement after the year 2000,
[01:18:04.520 --> 01:18:09.520]  you were subjected to the largest fraud ever perpetrated on the American public.
[01:18:09.520 --> 01:18:12.520]  The banks plotted not only to steal the equity in your home,
[01:18:12.520 --> 01:18:18.520]  they also planned to scam you out of your retirement funds and leave you homeless and penniless.
[01:18:18.520 --> 01:18:22.520]  The money changers have used what they stole from you to buy your legislators,
[01:18:22.520 --> 01:18:27.520]  government oversight agencies, and most unfortunately, the courts.
[01:18:27.520 --> 01:18:32.520]  If you have been foreclosed on, are facing foreclosure, or are up to date on your payments,
[01:18:32.520 --> 01:18:36.520]  there is something you can do to set things to right.
[01:18:36.520 --> 01:18:45.520]  Call 855-588-8501 and we will show you how to force the corrupt courts to do their jobs.
[01:18:45.520 --> 01:18:49.520]  You can stop these thieving bankers from destroying this country
[01:18:49.520 --> 01:18:55.520]  and from forcing your children and grandchildren onto the streets as slaves to them.
[01:18:55.520 --> 01:19:02.520]  Call 855-588-8501 now.
[01:19:02.520 --> 01:19:17.520]  Oh, come on.
[01:19:17.520 --> 01:19:19.520]  Alright folks, we are back.
[01:19:19.520 --> 01:19:21.520]  It's the rule of law radio.
[01:19:21.520 --> 01:19:26.520]  The ruling number is 512-646-1984.
[01:19:26.520 --> 01:19:30.520]  We got about 45 minutes left in the show tonight.
[01:19:30.520 --> 01:19:35.520]  Right now, we do have a caller on the board, Chris in Virginia.
[01:19:35.520 --> 01:19:38.520]  We're going to go ahead and take his call.
[01:19:38.520 --> 01:19:41.520]  Eatin' it, Chris, what can we do for you?
[01:19:41.520 --> 01:19:42.520]  How you doin'?
[01:19:42.520 --> 01:19:44.520]  Doing good.
[01:19:44.520 --> 01:19:48.520]  I have just a quick question on,
[01:19:48.520 --> 01:19:51.520]  do you know anything about the E-Verify?
[01:19:51.520 --> 01:19:53.520]  Yeah.
[01:19:53.520 --> 01:19:57.520]  My employer is all of a sudden, after I worked for 25 years,
[01:19:57.520 --> 01:20:02.520]  has come to E-Verify me and I was wondering,
[01:20:02.520 --> 01:20:13.520]  does this with the privacy act have anything to do with the plot it is?
[01:20:13.520 --> 01:20:20.520]  Well, that really depends on what the law in your state does according to the E-Verify.
[01:20:20.520 --> 01:20:22.520]  Right.
[01:20:22.520 --> 01:20:28.520]  So have you read the statute to see what you are or are not required to do in relation to that
[01:20:28.520 --> 01:20:34.520]  as an American rather than a foreigner working in the country?
[01:20:34.520 --> 01:20:40.520]  Not that, I have not.
[01:20:40.520 --> 01:20:43.520]  The company I work for is not just in Virginia.
[01:20:43.520 --> 01:20:48.520]  This is a major airline I work for.
[01:20:48.520 --> 01:20:49.520]  Okay.
[01:20:49.520 --> 01:20:54.520]  And applies to everybody throughout the system.
[01:20:54.520 --> 01:20:58.520]  Well, surely if you worked there for this long without any issues,
[01:20:58.520 --> 01:21:02.520]  then there should be some sort of grandfather on that.
[01:21:02.520 --> 01:21:07.520]  But again, you'd have to read the specific law to find out.
[01:21:07.520 --> 01:21:09.520]  Why?
[01:21:09.520 --> 01:21:14.520]  Well, I just wondered if there was anything that would be something like a privacy act
[01:21:14.520 --> 01:21:16.520]  with the plot that they're asking for.
[01:21:16.520 --> 01:21:19.520]  Well, the privacy act was written in 1974,
[01:21:19.520 --> 01:21:23.520]  long before what you're discussing ever became an issue.
[01:21:23.520 --> 01:21:28.520]  If, however, this E-Verify requires you to disclose a social security number,
[01:21:28.520 --> 01:21:30.520]  that's another animal.
[01:21:30.520 --> 01:21:33.520]  The privacy act in 1974 is still in force in effect,
[01:21:33.520 --> 01:21:38.520]  no matter what these state agencies like to think.
[01:21:38.520 --> 01:21:48.520]  They won't either my passports or driver's license
[01:21:48.520 --> 01:21:58.520]  or the social security number or at least two verifiable IDs.
[01:21:58.520 --> 01:21:59.520]  Okay.
[01:21:59.520 --> 01:22:02.520]  Well, this sounds like the same information that goes on a W-9.
[01:22:02.520 --> 01:22:07.520]  And they don't get to pick and choose what information you submit for ID.
[01:22:07.520 --> 01:22:11.520]  Again, W-9s and such only apply to foreigners.
[01:22:11.520 --> 01:22:14.520]  They don't apply to us.
[01:22:14.520 --> 01:22:17.520]  Okay.
[01:22:17.520 --> 01:22:23.520]  But what should I read up on, you think?
[01:22:23.520 --> 01:22:26.520]  Well, I'd read the act you're talking about first.
[01:22:26.520 --> 01:22:30.520]  I would read whatever state implementation you have for the E-Verify.
[01:22:30.520 --> 01:22:35.520]  And see who's required to comply with it.
[01:22:35.520 --> 01:22:37.520]  All right.
[01:22:37.520 --> 01:22:40.520]  All righty.
[01:22:40.520 --> 01:22:41.520]  Okay, Eddie.
[01:22:41.520 --> 01:22:42.520]  Okay.
[01:22:42.520 --> 01:22:43.520]  I'll do that.
[01:22:43.520 --> 01:22:44.520]  All right.
[01:22:44.520 --> 01:22:47.520]  That is not all.
[01:22:47.520 --> 01:22:48.520]  I'm not satisfied.
[01:22:48.520 --> 01:22:49.520]  I'll call you back.
[01:22:49.520 --> 01:22:50.520]  Okay.
[01:22:50.520 --> 01:22:51.520]  Thanks for calling in, Chris.
[01:22:51.520 --> 01:22:54.520]  Thank you.
[01:22:54.520 --> 01:22:55.520]  All right.
[01:22:55.520 --> 01:22:58.520]  That was our last caller for the time being, folks.
[01:22:58.520 --> 01:23:02.520]  Call in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:23:02.520 --> 01:23:07.520]  If y'all don't give us a call, you're going to have to listen to me and Randy drone on to the close of the show.
[01:23:07.520 --> 01:23:13.520]  That could get painful, especially since Randy's already fallen half asleep on us over there.
[01:23:13.520 --> 01:23:15.520]  All right.
[01:23:15.520 --> 01:23:26.520]  I did want to ask you some questions about, you know, I have missed the traffic shows on Monday.
[01:23:26.520 --> 01:23:34.520]  Can you kind of bring me up to speed on where you're at on your latest first blush issues in the traffic area?
[01:23:34.520 --> 01:23:35.520]  Okay.
[01:23:35.520 --> 01:23:45.520]  Well, right now, we have now surpassed the, we're headed up to almost five dozen winds through dismissals or whatever.
[01:23:45.520 --> 01:23:55.520]  Now, folks, when I'm telling you these numbers, these are based upon the information returned back to me that are people that are using
[01:23:55.520 --> 01:24:01.520]  the information and process that I've taught either through the traffic seminar, through the traffic class,
[01:24:01.520 --> 01:24:08.520]  and the due process class on Sundays, or a combination of both.
[01:24:08.520 --> 01:24:12.520]  Right now, we're approaching the five dozen wind mark.
[01:24:12.520 --> 01:24:19.520]  We have only lost two cases, and so we're doing really, really well on this.
[01:24:19.520 --> 01:24:23.520]  And they're not just in Austin, though the majority of them have been here.
[01:24:23.520 --> 01:24:29.520]  There are people reporting back from all across the state that they're continuously getting their tickets dismissed.
[01:24:29.520 --> 01:24:34.520]  It really amounts to standing up against them.
[01:24:34.520 --> 01:24:46.520]  Right now, we're so few in number that what's going on is as we cause them consternation by filing a paper trail that shows what they're doing.
[01:24:46.520 --> 01:24:50.520]  So rather than take us to trial, they dismiss the case.
[01:24:50.520 --> 01:24:59.520]  Right now, there's enough people that are resisting to be noticed, but not enough to make them want to force you to trial.
[01:24:59.520 --> 01:25:06.520]  It's easier to get rid of you so that your issues don't become known to the other people who are just willing to pay.
[01:25:06.520 --> 01:25:19.520]  So out of the hundreds of thousands, and I do mean that literally, Travis County in 2010 had over 304,000 traffic citations issued.
[01:25:19.520 --> 01:25:26.520]  So five dozen winds in those cases is not even a drop in the bucket to these people.
[01:25:26.520 --> 01:25:35.520]  So they're willing to dismiss these cases when we put up a stink about what they're doing just to get us out of the way so they can continue on to the others.
[01:25:35.520 --> 01:25:45.520]  But what I'm eventually hoping will happen is that we will become such a large dent in their ability to generate this revenue
[01:25:45.520 --> 01:25:53.520]  that they're going to have to start adjudicating these issues for fear of losing all of the money they've been stealing.
[01:25:53.520 --> 01:26:08.520]  If that turns out to be the case, then we've got some traction and we could start going forward on the court record to prove what a sham process the traffic courts are.
[01:26:08.520 --> 01:26:17.520]  Now there's ways we can expedite this, and when I get done with this Texas ProSafe Training Manual book that I'm trying to write,
[01:26:17.520 --> 01:26:29.520]  hopefully people will get it, they will read it, they will see exactly where the illegality is and what's being done to people through the traffic court system,
[01:26:29.520 --> 01:26:36.520]  and they will take this book down to their legislator's office and they will beat them black and blue with it.
[01:26:36.520 --> 01:26:45.520]  And I don't mean just one constituent, I mean as many as that one or more constituents can cause to rise up,
[01:26:45.520 --> 01:26:52.520]  march down there, each with their own copy of the book, and wailay this individual going in and out of their office.
[01:26:52.520 --> 01:27:00.520]  Why? Because the legislators are the ones that have allowed these courts to get away with stealing.
[01:27:00.520 --> 01:27:07.520]  They have not given us the power to hold these guys accountable, and now we're going to have to start doing it.
[01:27:07.520 --> 01:27:13.520]  Right now the only recourse we have is to sue the living daylights out of them after the fact,
[01:27:13.520 --> 01:27:22.520]  but even so our ability to do that is limited because not everybody has the means or the know-how to file a federal lawsuit
[01:27:22.520 --> 01:27:31.520]  to go after these cops and these magistrates and these crooked clerks and crooked city prosecutors and crooked county attorneys
[01:27:31.520 --> 01:27:40.520]  that are railroading innocent people that are not operating in a commercial capacity to whom these laws don't even begin to apply
[01:27:40.520 --> 01:27:45.520]  through this system entirely for the purpose of stealing their money.
[01:27:45.520 --> 01:27:48.520]  That's really all that's going on.
[01:27:48.520 --> 01:27:52.520]  Now we've come up with several specific new issues that we're dealing with here.
[01:27:52.520 --> 01:27:56.520]  We've revamped the motion to quash the complaint.
[01:27:56.520 --> 01:28:05.520]  I've written an all-new motion to quash the citation based upon the information I gave out to the gentlemen at the beginning of the show,
[01:28:05.520 --> 01:28:11.520]  the fact that the citation itself does not even comply with the statutory requirements of the citation.
[01:28:11.520 --> 01:28:21.520]  Therefore, it's illegal. Therefore, the officer initiated a transportation stop for the purpose of issuing an illegal citation,
[01:28:21.520 --> 01:28:27.520]  which means he committed a crime right off the bat.
[01:28:27.520 --> 01:28:31.520]  Now, Randy, I would really like for you to address that. Consider that little problem.
[01:28:31.520 --> 01:28:41.520]  That was why you were talking about that. I'm thinking, how do we create the greatest local politics?
[01:28:41.520 --> 01:28:49.520]  And the courts, they're making a lot of money at this, but the police officer is not.
[01:28:49.520 --> 01:28:58.520]  So if the police officer is making an illegal stop, we should go after the police officer personally.
[01:28:58.520 --> 01:29:02.520]  You file suit against him. They get in this big fight.
[01:29:02.520 --> 01:29:15.520]  One of the arguments we can make for immunity is, I mean, concerning the officers' qualified immunity,
[01:29:15.520 --> 01:29:20.520]  is to claim that the officer, in the process of committing the crime,
[01:29:20.520 --> 01:29:26.520]  used a motorized piece of equipment belonging to the city or the county.
[01:29:26.520 --> 01:29:33.520]  In that particular case under the government code, the city and the county both waived their sovereign immunity.
[01:29:33.520 --> 01:29:36.520]  He claimed that the officer had no subject out of jurisdiction.
[01:29:36.520 --> 01:29:40.520]  He has no duty to be sued by the police officer himself.
[01:29:40.520 --> 01:29:44.520]  That will create a lot of local politics.
[01:29:44.520 --> 01:29:49.520]  And to get them real excited, this is Randy Calton, David Stevens, and Craig,
[01:29:49.520 --> 01:29:53.520]  who's on radio. David, I see you there. We'll pick you up on the other side.
[01:29:53.520 --> 01:29:59.520]  I'll call it number 9512-646-1986.
[01:29:59.520 --> 01:30:03.520]  Top 10 reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing.
[01:30:03.520 --> 01:30:06.520]  Reason number 10. What is on the surveillance tapes?
[01:30:06.520 --> 01:30:09.520]  There were many video surveillance cameras that recorded the morning of the bombing,
[01:30:09.520 --> 01:30:13.520]  yet a few of these that had been released do not show what transpired with the rider truck at the Murr Building.
[01:30:13.520 --> 01:30:17.520]  Most recently, the government has claimed that all of the cameras that were in different buildings
[01:30:17.520 --> 01:30:21.520]  and maintained by different businesses were all having their tapes changed at the exact same time.
[01:30:21.520 --> 01:30:25.520]  This is insulting to the memory of those who perished in the bombing.
[01:30:25.520 --> 01:30:31.520]  What is being hidden from us? For more information, please go to OKCBombingTruth.com.
[01:30:31.520 --> 01:30:33.520]  Move over Nielsen ratings.
[01:30:33.520 --> 01:30:40.520]  Smart meters that measure home electricity consumption can now analyze everything you watch on your TV or DVD player.
[01:30:40.520 --> 01:30:44.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment to tell you how.
[01:30:44.520 --> 01:30:50.520]  Privacy is under attack. When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:50.520 --> 01:30:55.520]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:55.520 --> 01:31:00.520]  So protect your rights. Say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:00.520 --> 01:31:03.520]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:31:03.520 --> 01:31:06.520]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:31:06.520 --> 01:31:10.520]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:31:10.520 --> 01:31:14.520]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:31:14.520 --> 01:31:21.520]  New smart electric meters transmit data that can tell the power company whether you cook with a microwave, oven, or grill.
[01:31:21.520 --> 01:31:22.520]  Creepy.
[01:31:22.520 --> 01:31:27.520]  Now a new study shows smart meters could also tell your electric company what you're watching on TV.
[01:31:27.520 --> 01:31:35.520]  Researchers at Germany's Munster University say that spying smart meters can be used to create TV viewer profiles.
[01:31:35.520 --> 01:31:40.520]  By analyzing the power spikes associated with light and dark passages of a film,
[01:31:40.520 --> 01:31:43.520]  the power company could decipher what your TV is playing.
[01:31:43.520 --> 01:31:45.520]  That's not smart at all.
[01:31:45.520 --> 01:31:51.520]  Power companies should stick to selling electricity, not collecting details of what we do in our own homes.
[01:31:51.520 --> 01:31:54.520]  It's time to pull the plug on that bad idea.
[01:31:54.520 --> 01:32:21.520]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:21.520 --> 01:32:25.520]  Hi, folks. We are back at the Law Radio.
[01:32:25.520 --> 01:32:28.520]  Right now, before I'm here, we have a half an hour left.
[01:32:28.520 --> 01:32:33.520]  The call in number is 512-646-1984.
[01:32:33.520 --> 01:32:38.520]  So, folks, if you've got any questions, queries, ponders, or issues, now's the time to get in line.
[01:32:38.520 --> 01:32:43.520]  Please don't wait till the last minute because we will not have an overtime mode tonight.
[01:32:43.520 --> 01:32:47.520]  So, if you need help or just something you want to talk about, give us a call.
[01:32:47.520 --> 01:32:51.520]  Right now, we've got David in Texas and Jerry Forman on the line.
[01:32:51.520 --> 01:32:53.520]  We're going to go ahead and take David.
[01:32:53.520 --> 01:32:56.520]  Evening, David. What can we do for you?
[01:32:56.520 --> 01:32:59.520]  Good evening, Eddie. It's good to talk to you and Randy.
[01:32:59.520 --> 01:33:01.520]  I was just wanting to kind of open a dialogue.
[01:33:01.520 --> 01:33:07.520]  I talked to you last Sunday a little bit about kind of figuring out how we could get a simple lawsuit against these banks
[01:33:07.520 --> 01:33:14.520]  for not opening up a bank account for people who don't give them a social security number.
[01:33:14.520 --> 01:33:18.520]  And then the last caller, you were talking about the e-verify and the traffic stop.
[01:33:18.520 --> 01:33:24.520]  I'm sorry, talking about the e-verify, but then you're also talking about the traffic stops.
[01:33:24.520 --> 01:33:32.520]  And those three issues, I had a little bit on each one of them that I was wanting to ask you about.
[01:33:32.520 --> 01:33:37.520]  The last time I went to the bank and tried to open an account, I didn't give them a social security number,
[01:33:37.520 --> 01:33:39.520]  but I did give them an ID number.
[01:33:39.520 --> 01:33:46.520]  The bank of America worked for three days before they wouldn't let me have it because they found out that wasn't a social security number.
[01:33:46.520 --> 01:33:55.520]  It seems to me like they're actually using the e-verify to check your ID information.
[01:33:55.520 --> 01:34:02.520]  There is actually a system in place and there has been for a long time for banks to run the number you give them through
[01:34:02.520 --> 01:34:06.520]  to find out whether or not it's a valid social security number in the federal system.
[01:34:06.520 --> 01:34:15.520]  What the banks are failing to tell the general public is, is there is no law that makes it mandatory for the bank to have a social.
[01:34:15.520 --> 01:34:24.520]  In fact, the banking statutes themselves specifically state that the bank may request the number,
[01:34:24.520 --> 01:34:29.520]  and they are in fact required to request the number up to three times.
[01:34:29.520 --> 01:34:39.520]  And if after that third attempt that number is not provided, the bank is given specific instructions on how to handle that situation.
[01:34:39.520 --> 01:34:46.520]  They are to take the name of the account holder, the account number, the address of the account holder,
[01:34:46.520 --> 01:34:54.520]  and they are to put it into a specific listing for all accounts that do not have attached social security numbers.
[01:34:54.520 --> 01:34:59.520]  That is the extent of what the law allows the bank to do.
[01:34:59.520 --> 01:35:13.520]  What the banks have done is they have declared an internal policy to create a violation of federal law through making a social security number mandatory on a bank account.
[01:35:13.520 --> 01:35:20.520]  The problem is, is it's illegal. It violates the Privacy Act of 1974.
[01:35:20.520 --> 01:35:37.520]  The other problem is, is that they are enforcing this illegal activity against American citizens who by law are not even required to participate in social security, much less have a number.
[01:35:37.520 --> 01:35:49.520]  Only the foreigners that have moved to this country and have not become US citizens are required to have and maintain a social security number.
[01:35:49.520 --> 01:35:52.520]  Nobody else is required to have it.
[01:35:52.520 --> 01:36:00.520]  And yet the bank is now trying to force it on everyone despite their national status.
[01:36:00.520 --> 01:36:13.520]  What would be the simplest approach to suing the bank without trying to drag it into a giant federal RICO type of a thing, something that you might be able to win?
[01:36:13.520 --> 01:36:20.520]  You'd have to sue them in the Fed on an individual basis. This is a federal question because it deals with a social security issue.
[01:36:20.520 --> 01:36:23.520]  You sue them for injunctive relief.
[01:36:23.520 --> 01:36:25.520]  Okay, that would be good.
[01:36:25.520 --> 01:36:37.520]  That would be the easiest. You're not asking for money. You're asking for injunctive relief. You're asking the court to tell them, this is what the law says, do it.
[01:36:37.520 --> 01:36:43.520]  And so you should bring up the Privacy Act 1974 and show where in the law they have to do it.
[01:36:43.520 --> 01:36:58.520]  Well, the problem is there's recent case law in the books where the courts, the federal courts, are once again ignoring the specificity of the law in favor of what other agencies want to do.
[01:36:58.520 --> 01:37:08.520]  They're ignoring law in order to implement agency regulations that are not based on any law.
[01:37:08.520 --> 01:37:27.520]  And so not only are you going to have to bring out the law that controls the issue, you're going to have to argue why any previous decision that implemented a rule in place of a law should be overturned and stricken down for being just grossly and confidently made.
[01:37:27.520 --> 01:37:45.520]  I suspect that if you file the suit against the bank, you will probably get the bank to capitulate and open your account and pay your filing fee just to get you to go away.
[01:37:45.520 --> 01:38:00.520]  Well, I did this with two banks. I did it with the biggest bank in the world, Bank of America, and probably the smallest one, Little Bank down in Bastrop. And Bank of America beat around a bush for three days before they finally, and I even gave them a passport.
[01:38:00.520 --> 01:38:10.520]  It wasn't good enough. If I wouldn't give them a number, they wouldn't do it. And they finally just flat said no. And they would come out and say it was a number, but they had everything else they needed.
[01:38:10.520 --> 01:38:25.520]  Legitimate address is legitimate everything. It just had to be the number. And the Little Bank down in Bastrop, they actually opened my account. I told them I had a Grand Canyon driver's license. I gave it to them.
[01:38:25.520 --> 01:38:37.520]  They opened the account and I told them that I was not from here. I did not have nor would I have any use to get a social security number. So whatever they had to do to go ahead and do it.
[01:38:37.520 --> 01:38:52.520]  Well, they opened my account and I put $50 cash in it. And they took it, opened it up. The whole works. And then two weeks later, I get a certified letter from them with the $50 cashier's check said we can't do business with you.
[01:38:52.520 --> 01:39:02.520]  They wouldn't know. They won't tell me why anything, but that's the whole reason it's got to be. So the small bank would probably be the best one to start soon. What do you think?
[01:39:02.520 --> 01:39:20.520]  Possibly. As to which one would be the best, hard to say. Eventually you're going to find that most of these banks have larger subsidiary owners. They're now just small branch banks of the bigger banks that have not had a name change implemented.
[01:39:20.520 --> 01:39:28.520]  So whether or not that would be effective without getting bumped higher up the ladder to a larger division of the bank, hard to say.
[01:39:28.520 --> 01:39:35.520]  Well, if you start with the biggest bank, you know you're already going to be there because you know that they've been sued a thousand times for the same thing.
[01:39:35.520 --> 01:39:38.520]  Possibly. So they are probably already trained.
[01:39:38.520 --> 01:39:44.520]  Remember, we're pretty much living in a society of, oh, okay, individuals.
[01:39:44.520 --> 01:39:45.520]  Absolutely.
[01:39:45.520 --> 01:39:52.520]  So whether or not they've been sued, that's up for grabs on the eternal question of have they or have they not.
[01:39:52.520 --> 01:40:02.520]  The small bank probably has not. So what would you sue them for? Would you sue them in federal court? What's the federal question?
[01:40:02.520 --> 01:40:05.520]  The federal question is a violation of the Privacy Act.
[01:40:05.520 --> 01:40:25.520]  Sue them in the state court because they are highly regulated so they fall under color of law and then let them move it to the state, to the federal court and you don't have to pay that big firing fee.
[01:40:25.520 --> 01:40:29.520]  Good move. Very good.
[01:40:29.520 --> 01:40:45.520]  And it probably is a smaller bank, you know, if in fact they're not required to have a so screwed number, then they're likely to say, you know, we don't want to have to pay an attorney $10,000 to write us a answer to this guy's lawsuit.
[01:40:45.520 --> 01:40:52.520]  Just open his account and be done with it.
[01:40:52.520 --> 01:40:59.520]  And that's what I'd expect from reasonable people. You're probably going to get more reasonable people in a small bank than in a big bank.
[01:40:59.520 --> 01:41:07.520]  Well, that's why I tried to open the account. But when they closed it, you could just tell it came from higher up. It came from someone said, whoa, we can't do this.
[01:41:07.520 --> 01:41:10.520]  Someone checks something, he verifies something.
[01:41:10.520 --> 01:41:15.520]  Send that small bank a tort letter.
[01:41:15.520 --> 01:41:17.520]  All right, that's a good.
[01:41:17.520 --> 01:41:28.520]  Well, you know, that you're prepared to file an injunctive suit to force them to treat. How would you do that?
[01:41:28.520 --> 01:41:36.520]  This bank is after all a private company and I don't know how they would be bound to do business with you if they didn't want to.
[01:41:36.520 --> 01:41:39.520]  But since you're highly regulated, I suspect they will.
[01:41:39.520 --> 01:41:44.520]  Well, then they're discriminating if they choose not to do business with me because I don't have a lover.
[01:41:44.520 --> 01:41:52.520]  They can discriminate against you as long as it's not for certain things, race, religion.
[01:41:52.520 --> 01:41:56.520]  National origin, which is exactly what they're doing.
[01:41:56.520 --> 01:42:00.520]  Can they discriminate against you because you're a jerk?
[01:42:00.520 --> 01:42:04.520]  No, they can't, obviously, because they let me open the account.
[01:42:04.520 --> 01:42:10.520]  Oh, okay. You had another question.
[01:42:10.520 --> 01:42:16.520]  Yes, it was back to the traffic stops and you were saying a while ago, Sue the police officer.
[01:42:16.520 --> 01:42:24.520]  A few years ago, there was a man that I think it meant I think came down from Alaska and that's what they've been doing in Alaska.
[01:42:24.520 --> 01:42:35.520]  And I wouldn't, you know, every time I've dealt with a cop on the side of the road and I have asked them for their ID card, their driver's license.
[01:42:35.520 --> 01:42:40.520]  They just pointed their badge and said, this is my authority. They're just real smart. They could care less.
[01:42:40.520 --> 01:42:43.520]  And I said, I want to see some identification.
[01:42:43.520 --> 01:42:52.520]  And one of them said, I don't have to identify myself. You get your ass back in the car and get out of here after he wrote me a ticket.
[01:42:52.520 --> 01:43:02.520]  All right. So they just refused to give you any identification and you go down to their supervisor and tell them you want identification on this guy.
[01:43:02.520 --> 01:43:09.520]  And they will not give you his name, address or anything. It's all secret.
[01:43:09.520 --> 01:43:20.520]  Yeah, they're supposed to give you a name but not address. The address of a police officer is restricted and that's understandable.
[01:43:20.520 --> 01:43:25.520]  It looks to me like if they make mine, I should be able to make theirs public.
[01:43:25.520 --> 01:43:36.520]  Yeah, but if you're a policeman and you're arresting these guys, it would be hard to do that if you've got a family and you're afraid these guys can come out and shoot your house.
[01:43:36.520 --> 01:43:41.520]  And you get their professional address and their business address but not their private one.
[01:43:41.520 --> 01:43:55.520]  This is Eddie Craig. They're receiving through my radio. We're about to go in our last segment and we've got David, Jerry Forman and Tony on the line. We'll take you when we get back.
[01:44:11.520 --> 01:44:22.520]  This is our largest selling product, micro plant powder. Our micro plant powder is rich in silica and probiotics to help rebuild the immune system and to create a healthy stomach flora.
[01:44:22.520 --> 01:44:27.520]  Micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake and is perfect to add to your storage shelter.
[01:44:27.520 --> 01:44:35.520]  We urge our listeners to please visit us at hempusa.org and remember all of our products are chemical free and healthy to eat.
[01:44:35.520 --> 01:44:44.520]  We constantly strive to give you the best service, highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere and we offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the U.S.
[01:44:44.520 --> 01:45:00.520]  Please visit us at hempusa.org or call 908-6912608. That's 908-6912608. See what our powder, seeds and oil can do for you at hempusa.org.
[01:45:00.520 --> 01:45:15.520]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit? Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step.
[01:45:15.520 --> 01:45:22.520]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing. If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:22.520 --> 01:45:33.520]  Thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too. Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:45:33.520 --> 01:45:42.520]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.520 --> 01:45:52.520]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics and much more.
[01:45:52.520 --> 01:46:13.520]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:22.520 --> 01:46:36.520]  Hi folks, we are back. This is rule of law radio. We are in our last segment.
[01:46:36.520 --> 01:46:44.520]  Right now we have a couple of callers on the board. We're going to see if we can get them all wrapped up and get this evening done without leaving anybody behind.
[01:46:44.520 --> 01:46:47.520]  Alright Mr. David, can we finish up with you here?
[01:46:47.520 --> 01:47:00.520]  Yes, just real shortly, back to the traffic stop. If you need someone to do a volunteer run a red light camera, I'll be glad to do that and set this thing up.
[01:47:00.520 --> 01:47:08.520]  The problem is my car is a registered to a dead end address so I can never get any ticket mail to me.
[01:47:08.520 --> 01:47:17.520]  If someone wants to loan me their car to run one of these things, I'll be glad to put a big sign and say this is David and admit that it's my ticket.
[01:47:17.520 --> 01:47:20.520]  If that you'd be interested in finding one of those kinds.
[01:47:20.520 --> 01:47:25.520]  The only problem is what they're going to wind up doing is sending it to the owner of the car anyway.
[01:47:25.520 --> 01:47:33.520]  That's true, but the owner of the car has proof that he wasn't driving it and I'll admit that I was operating it.
[01:47:33.520 --> 01:47:42.520]  Well, the thing is though, you're not operating it. First thing is stop using their terminology to describe what you're doing.
[01:47:42.520 --> 01:47:49.520]  You're not in commerce, you're not a driver, you're not an operator, it's not a motor vehicle.
[01:47:49.520 --> 01:47:54.520]  What's the word you should use in place of operating?
[01:47:54.520 --> 01:48:07.520]  Traveling, just behind the wheel of the conveyance, the automobile, whatever you want to do, but don't use their commercially descriptive terms.
[01:48:07.520 --> 01:48:14.520]  Okay, so whenever they got the ticket mail to them with my picture in it, I could write them a letter and use the proper terms.
[01:48:14.520 --> 01:48:18.520]  And I don't mind doing that and setting the thing up if anyone's interested in that.
[01:48:18.520 --> 01:48:26.520]  Well, the problem though is there's a better way to fight these red light camera tickets and that is as a bill of pains and penalties.
[01:48:26.520 --> 01:48:36.520]  These things are set up to be an automatic administrative determination of guilt, which is absolutely forbidden.
[01:48:36.520 --> 01:48:38.520]  That's a bill of attainder.
[01:48:38.520 --> 01:48:46.520]  No, that's when it's a larger penalty. When it's a misdemeanor money only penalty like this, it's a bill of pains and penalties.
[01:48:46.520 --> 01:48:48.520]  It's okay.
[01:48:48.520 --> 01:49:04.520]  Alright, so given that, that's the first thing we attack the ticket as is as a bill of pains and penalties because it is an administrative and or legislative determination of guilt without any judicial review.
[01:49:04.520 --> 01:49:12.520]  That is absolutely forbidden by both the federal and state constitutions.
[01:49:12.520 --> 01:49:16.520]  Is that the same as if you run a toll booth?
[01:49:16.520 --> 01:49:18.520]  Uh, Chanda.
[01:49:18.520 --> 01:49:20.520]  Chanda.
[01:49:20.520 --> 01:49:22.520]  Okay.
[01:49:22.520 --> 01:49:26.520]  Alright, I won't take it for any more time. Thank you very much. We'll talk about that later.
[01:49:26.520 --> 01:49:28.520]  Alright, David.
[01:49:28.520 --> 01:49:30.520]  Have a good one.
[01:49:30.520 --> 01:49:32.520]  Bye-bye.
[01:49:32.520 --> 01:49:34.520]  Alright, now we're going to go to Jury Foreman.
[01:49:34.520 --> 01:49:36.520]  Aiden, what can we do for you?
[01:49:36.520 --> 01:49:38.520]  Hello, Aiden.
[01:49:38.520 --> 01:49:40.520]  Hello, are you there?
[01:49:40.520 --> 01:49:44.520]  Hello, Randy. Good to hear you, Randy.
[01:49:44.520 --> 01:49:50.520]  Eddie, this is for you. Specifically, this traffic course.
[01:49:50.520 --> 01:49:54.520]  Some of the smaller cities, you hear me okay?
[01:49:54.520 --> 01:49:56.520]  Yeah.
[01:49:56.520 --> 01:50:06.520]  Some of the smaller cities are using traffic citation booklets and handing them out to the code enforcement officers.
[01:50:06.520 --> 01:50:22.520]  Setting up, I have an older rental home, it had peeling paint, and I received in the mail a citation on a same as a traffic ticket, but it had information.
[01:50:22.520 --> 01:50:26.520]  I guess he got it off of public records.
[01:50:26.520 --> 01:50:40.520]  I need to know if your course lays out the same kind of defense for code violations.
[01:50:40.520 --> 01:50:44.520]  No, because a code violation is something different.
[01:50:44.520 --> 01:50:54.520]  A code violation, it depends on whether or not the code you allegedly violated is an ordinance code versus a state code.
[01:50:54.520 --> 01:50:56.520]  No, these are ordinance codes.
[01:50:56.520 --> 01:51:02.520]  It's a smaller city, not an Austin. It's a smaller city.
[01:51:02.520 --> 01:51:08.520]  They say they're code violations of their ordinance.
[01:51:08.520 --> 01:51:16.520]  Okay, that's a city ordinance. David, it's not just a code.
[01:51:16.520 --> 01:51:20.520]  First off is the city ordinance based on a state law.
[01:51:20.520 --> 01:51:30.520]  Second, who does that state law apply to, to private property or to commercial property owned by corporations?
[01:51:30.520 --> 01:51:35.520]  Who does it apply to? Until you read the statute, you're not going to know that.
[01:51:35.520 --> 01:51:46.520]  Okay, so I need to go back and start with the city code and then see if it follows back to state law.
[01:51:46.520 --> 01:51:47.520]  Correct.
[01:51:47.520 --> 01:52:02.520]  It applies. In my case, I just happened to be, I just happened to be a person who owns a rental house in this other town, not where I live, but in another town.
[01:52:02.520 --> 01:52:09.520]  And it's, that's where the violation was.
[01:52:09.520 --> 01:52:12.520]  Okay.
[01:52:12.520 --> 01:52:21.520]  So the, just start with the local town and then go backwards to the, see if it refers back to the state law.
[01:52:21.520 --> 01:52:22.520]  Yes.
[01:52:22.520 --> 01:52:26.520]  Is that, is that what you're telling me?
[01:52:26.520 --> 01:52:31.520]  Yeah, you need to read both of them and see what they apply to is what I'm telling you.
[01:52:31.520 --> 01:52:39.520]  Okay, but your course wouldn't help me defend against, against the code violation.
[01:52:39.520 --> 01:52:43.520]  The traffic seminar does not help you defend against anything.
[01:52:43.520 --> 01:52:49.520]  Its primary purpose is to teach you how to read and understand law no matter what its source.
[01:52:49.520 --> 01:52:55.520]  And we simply use the traffic laws for that purpose.
[01:52:55.520 --> 01:53:04.520]  So as far as learning of defense, you learn that based upon what the requisite elements of the law is that you're working with.
[01:53:04.520 --> 01:53:07.520]  Right. Okay.
[01:53:07.520 --> 01:53:18.520]  All right. Well, I think I understood where I needed to go, but I hadn't talked to you or Randy either want to, about a code violation.
[01:53:18.520 --> 01:53:26.520]  And I just wondered if it was parallel to the, since they use the same ticket book instead of writing a violation.
[01:53:26.520 --> 01:53:34.520]  It doesn't matter if they use the same citation book or not, as long as code enforcement is not trying to issue a traffic ticket.
[01:53:34.520 --> 01:53:38.520]  It's not a traffic ticket. It's a code violation ticket.
[01:53:38.520 --> 01:53:45.520]  I got that. But you said they're using the same citation that the traffic cops use.
[01:53:45.520 --> 01:53:47.520]  The same book. Yeah.
[01:53:47.520 --> 01:53:57.520]  Okay. It doesn't matter that they're using the same book as long as the code enforcement officer is not trying to write a traffic ticket.
[01:53:57.520 --> 01:53:58.520]  Gotcha.
[01:53:58.520 --> 01:54:02.520]  You said he's not. So that's okay.
[01:54:02.520 --> 01:54:07.520]  Right. It's a different ball game, what you're saying.
[01:54:07.520 --> 01:54:10.520]  Kinda, yeah.
[01:54:10.520 --> 01:54:20.520]  Okay. Well, I've enjoyed learning from you and I continue to do so. I'm going to get there and let the next man have his shot.
[01:54:20.520 --> 01:54:22.520]  All right, David. Thanks for calling in.
[01:54:22.520 --> 01:54:26.520]  Okay. That's jury. That was David before me.
[01:54:26.520 --> 01:54:29.520]  Okay.
[01:54:29.520 --> 01:54:31.520]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:54:31.520 --> 01:54:34.520]  You got it.
[01:54:34.520 --> 01:54:37.520]  All right. Now we're going to Tony in Illinois.
[01:54:37.520 --> 01:54:41.520]  All right, Tony, we got about four minutes. What can we do for you?
[01:54:41.520 --> 01:54:44.520]  Good evening. Good to have you back, Randy.
[01:54:44.520 --> 01:54:53.520]  Well, I'll call some of my longer stuff, but you've got to call and mention that strawman garbage.
[01:54:53.520 --> 01:55:04.520]  Well, hopefully you can address that if you're making a Malice Jones show because there's an epidemic among well-many people and he posts his stuff on YouTube.
[01:55:04.520 --> 01:55:14.520]  And there's a lot of people on YouTube that buy into that crap and there's not really a lot of material that's dissecting it.
[01:55:14.520 --> 01:55:25.520]  But I think a while back, you guys said that you would rather use freeman and sovereign now, but that's a loaded word too.
[01:55:25.520 --> 01:55:29.520]  And if you go on YouTube, you'll find that out. There's a guy up in Canada.
[01:55:29.520 --> 01:55:39.520]  Right. And yeah, a lot of them are taking those tag phrases and turn them into something to reference what they're doing, just like the strawman and everything else.
[01:55:39.520 --> 01:55:52.520]  I completely agree with you. But technically speaking, out of all the things that are actually written into the old law and records, freeman is exactly what we're supposed to be.
[01:55:52.520 --> 01:56:00.520]  Well, we were originally called free holders, but they changed it to start referencing them as freemen.
[01:56:00.520 --> 01:56:07.520]  And instead of it being two separate words, they just ran them together as a single word.
[01:56:07.520 --> 01:56:24.520]  I don't think there's any problem with promoting individuals for sovereignty over state use of patience of your rights and state sovereignty over federal use of patience
[01:56:24.520 --> 01:56:31.520]  or national sovereignty over internationalism.
[01:56:31.520 --> 01:56:38.520]  I don't know. Do you have people recording your seminars now?
[01:56:38.520 --> 01:56:44.520]  Yeah, there's usually one or two or five recorders going in there at any one time, but they're only audio.
[01:56:44.520 --> 01:56:50.520]  Oh, really? Well, there's a site called Ustream.
[01:56:50.520 --> 01:57:00.520]  Yeah, but in the room that we've got there's not enough lighting quality in there to make any type of camera useful in the lighting conditions that we have.
[01:57:00.520 --> 01:57:03.520]  And the only thing it would get would be me.
[01:57:03.520 --> 01:57:09.520]  It wouldn't be able to actually see anything that was going up on the screen or anything there behind me.
[01:57:09.520 --> 01:57:16.520]  Yes, and the way Eddie's been growing lately, we would need a really wide angle lens.
[01:57:16.520 --> 01:57:18.520]  Fish eye maybe.
[01:57:18.520 --> 01:57:20.520]  Hey, I'm actually getting smaller.
[01:57:20.520 --> 01:57:25.520]  Like Louis Anderson said, people keep saying that I'm out of shape.
[01:57:25.520 --> 01:57:29.520]  Well, I got news for you. Round is a shape.
[01:57:29.520 --> 01:57:36.520]  Have you guys ever heard you've been dragging before you make transcripts of the show?
[01:57:36.520 --> 01:57:39.520]  Because there's not really a way for you guys...
[01:57:39.520 --> 01:57:52.520]  I loaded up Dragon and I put on my $150 headset and talked into it and it told me there was a problem with the microphone.
[01:57:52.520 --> 01:57:56.520]  It couldn't understand me.
[01:57:56.520 --> 01:58:02.520]  I gave it to Ken who's got a louder voice and understood him perfectly.
[01:58:02.520 --> 01:58:06.520]  I'm afraid I've got a speech defect, so it didn't work for me.
[01:58:06.520 --> 01:58:17.520]  What does it have the federal court interpreted without unnecessary delay as far as taking it before Josh, after he's been arrested?
[01:58:17.520 --> 01:58:23.520]  Well, it actually varies. Some are saying 24 hours is not a lengthy delay.
[01:58:23.520 --> 01:58:27.520]  But every one of them is misinterpreted quickly.
[01:58:27.520 --> 01:58:33.520]  24 hours. Less than 24 hours, prima facia.
[01:58:33.520 --> 01:58:41.520]  It's timely. More than 24 hours, prima facia is. It's not timely. It only goes to prima facia.
[01:58:41.520 --> 01:58:45.520]  Okay, thank you guys.
[01:58:45.520 --> 01:58:48.520]  Alright, thanks everybody for listening to the show.
[01:58:48.520 --> 01:58:55.520]  This has been Rule of Law Radio. Eddie Craig, Randy Calton, Debra Stevens. Thank you so much. We'll see you Monday night.
[01:59:18.520 --> 01:59:30.520]  We have a free copy today from Bibles for America. Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:30.520 --> 01:59:39.520]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references, plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:39.520 --> 01:59:42.520]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:42.520 --> 01:59:50.520]  To get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:50.520 --> 02:00:14.520]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.