[00:00.000 --> 00:04.560]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[00:04.560 --> 00:10.240]  The audacity of hope, the U.S. boat taking part in a 10-vessel aid flotilla bound for
[00:10.240 --> 00:15.680]  Gaza, was prevented from leaving Greek waters shortly after it departed Friday.
[00:15.680 --> 00:20.400]  Critics charged the boat was targeted by Greek authorities under Israeli pressure, even though
[00:20.400 --> 00:24.240]  it passed all inspections and its papers were in order.
[00:24.240 --> 00:28.200]  Greek authorities gave no reason why the boat was blocked.
[00:28.200 --> 00:33.040]  The Wall Street Journal reported Friday Tokyo Electric Power Company officials at the Fukushima
[00:33.040 --> 00:38.160]  nuclear power plant knew for years about a critical design flaw in the plant's older
[00:38.160 --> 00:40.400]  reactors that did nothing.
[00:40.400 --> 00:45.520]  Former officials and workers said TEPCO failed to retrofit the general electric reactors
[00:45.520 --> 00:50.320]  in the decades since their construction due to a combination of complacency, cost-cutting
[00:50.320 --> 00:52.920]  and lax regulation.
[00:52.920 --> 00:59.600]  Iraqi Shiite cleric Muqtada Al-Sidir is heading a campaign to bar U.S. troops from cities and
[00:59.600 --> 01:04.920]  government buildings to pressure Baghdad and Washington to remove U.S. forces from Iraq
[01:04.920 --> 01:06.440]  by the year end.
[01:06.440 --> 01:12.680]  Last week Basra's council demanded U.S. troops leave civilian buildings used as army bases,
[01:12.680 --> 01:15.960]  including the city airport.
[01:15.960 --> 01:20.760]  The U.K. Guardian reported Friday British government officials approached nuclear companies to
[01:20.760 --> 01:25.920]  coordinate a public relations strategy playing down the Fukushima nuclear accident just
[01:25.920 --> 01:29.080]  two days after the earthquake and tsunami.
[01:29.080 --> 01:34.000]  Emails obtained by the Guardian show how the business and energy departments worked closely
[01:34.000 --> 01:39.640]  with the multinational companies EDF Energy, Arriva and Westinghouse to try and ensure
[01:39.640 --> 01:44.640]  the accident did not derail plans for a new generation of nuclear plants in the U.K.
[01:44.640 --> 01:49.440]  The ongoing Fukushima disaster has forced 80,000 people to flee from their homes and
[01:49.440 --> 01:55.400]  many experts have said it surpasses Chernobyl in scale and scope of radiation contamination.
[01:55.400 --> 02:00.440]  The U.K. government last week confirmed plans for eight new nuclear stations in England
[02:00.440 --> 02:02.960]  and Wales.
[02:02.960 --> 02:10.240]  The Justice Department inquiry into CIA interrogations of 101 terrorist detainees has led to a full
[02:10.240 --> 02:15.040]  criminal investigation into the deaths of just two people while they were in custody
[02:15.040 --> 02:17.280]  in Iraq and Afghanistan.
[02:17.280 --> 02:21.720]  Attorney General Eric Holder said Thursday he accepted the recommendation of federal
[02:21.720 --> 02:27.520]  prosecutor John Durham, who has conducted an inquiry into CIA interrogation practices
[02:27.520 --> 02:29.760]  during the Bush administration.
[02:29.760 --> 02:35.640]  Holder said Durham looked at the treatment of 101 detainees in U.S. custody since 9-11
[02:35.640 --> 02:40.320]  and concluded only two deaths warranted criminal investigation.
[02:40.320 --> 02:46.200]  Officials said Durham was looking at the deaths of Gold Rotman and Medellah Al-Jamadi.
[02:46.200 --> 02:51.080]  Al-Jamadi died in November 2002 in a secret CIA prison in Kabul.
[02:51.080 --> 02:55.600]  Al-Jamadi died in 2003 at Abu Ghraib in Iraq.
[02:55.600 --> 03:25.560]  A military autopsy declared his death a homicide.
[03:25.600 --> 03:48.120]  Okay, we're back.
[03:48.120 --> 03:51.520]  Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig, Lula Radio.
[03:51.520 --> 03:55.440]  We're going to go to Frank in New York.
[03:55.440 --> 03:56.440]  Frank.
[03:56.440 --> 03:57.440]  Yes.
[03:57.440 --> 04:01.080]  Tell us about what was going on.
[04:01.080 --> 04:04.480]  We were talking yesterday and we put you off till today.
[04:04.480 --> 04:08.760]  Kind of give a quick synopsis to bring everybody up to speed.
[04:08.760 --> 04:09.760]  Okay.
[04:09.760 --> 04:13.920]  I'm going to take about that one.
[04:13.920 --> 04:14.920]  Okay.
[04:14.920 --> 04:23.040]  I was holding off on answering a warrant, being totally ignorant of it to try to learn
[04:23.040 --> 04:27.720]  something about how corrupt everybody was.
[04:27.720 --> 04:38.640]  I stonewalled two rangers at a park on a violation ticket camping over four nights instead of
[04:38.640 --> 04:45.720]  three and burning some cans in the fire or whatever, violation tickets.
[04:45.720 --> 04:51.760]  I told them my name was Frank and that's all I was going to tell them.
[04:51.760 --> 04:57.920]  I was cooperative in every other way, pretending to look for my ID and stuff like that while
[04:57.920 --> 05:08.280]  they were, he was calling the troopers and the deputy sheriff and another ranger to back
[05:08.280 --> 05:15.480]  them up because they had a camper or whatever that was refusing to take a ticket or using
[05:15.480 --> 05:19.720]  its rights or whatever they were doing.
[05:19.720 --> 05:29.000]  So I sat there nicely and I went back and forth with them about some other things like
[05:29.000 --> 05:34.640]  driving without a license and all that stuff and filled them in on that stuff and they
[05:34.640 --> 05:38.320]  shut up about it.
[05:38.320 --> 05:39.320]  Thank you.
[05:39.320 --> 05:44.480]  Thank you and Eddie for that.
[05:44.480 --> 05:52.600]  Then they arrested me on false charges of obstructing and erased one of my recordings
[05:52.600 --> 06:02.320]  of the whole ordeal, which I know I have them dead to rights on their claims that I was
[06:02.320 --> 06:08.280]  obstructing and also probably at the end of the tape, I haven't examined it forensically
[06:08.280 --> 06:12.880]  yet that they even were saying, how do we erase this tape?
[06:12.880 --> 06:18.920]  They were trying to erase the tape and everything, even speaking about it openly in a huddle
[06:18.920 --> 06:22.480]  right around the tape recorder on the seat.
[06:22.480 --> 06:27.480]  The window was open about, for the car, it was open about four inches.
[06:27.480 --> 06:31.000]  I'm sure the high definition microphone caught it.
[06:31.000 --> 06:37.240]  I just haven't had the chance to really examine it and amplify it and get this transcript
[06:37.240 --> 06:39.240]  because it's quite upsetting.
[06:39.240 --> 06:44.320]  Okay, wait, wait, okay, okay, where are we going to?
[06:44.320 --> 06:56.520]  We went from that yesterday to the issue of your girlfriend's son filing complaints against
[06:56.520 --> 06:57.520]  you.
[06:57.520 --> 06:58.520]  Right.
[06:58.520 --> 07:04.520]  He doesn't want to, the district attorney or assistant district attorney.
[07:04.520 --> 07:05.520]  Okay.
[07:05.520 --> 07:06.520]  Hold on.
[07:06.520 --> 07:07.520]  Stop a second.
[07:07.520 --> 07:14.800]  This is a son that disagreed with his mother seeing you and what was the complaint that
[07:14.800 --> 07:17.600]  he filed against you?
[07:17.600 --> 07:27.240]  The complaint exactly was that I was recklessly endangering him by erratically driving at him
[07:27.240 --> 07:34.600]  and bumping his knee to where he fell on the hood, that's what he said, of the car.
[07:34.600 --> 07:41.080]  What the truth was, he was punching the windows that his brother egged him on and she wanted
[07:41.080 --> 07:45.200]  to get out of there because she heard the whole conversation between him and his brother
[07:45.200 --> 07:47.600]  and he was getting violent.
[07:47.600 --> 07:56.440]  He was going to come out there and start breaking the windows, whatever, of the car.
[07:56.440 --> 08:00.840]  She looked at me and said, let's get out of here and grab the stick shift lever and
[08:00.840 --> 08:08.640]  threw it in drive in a panic like when he started punching the windows and I hit the
[08:08.640 --> 08:15.640]  gas and the car went forward a little bit but I stopped it.
[08:15.640 --> 08:17.440]  It didn't bother him at all.
[08:17.440 --> 08:20.960]  Was he in front of the car?
[08:20.960 --> 08:23.720]  He was in the front and on the side and everywhere.
[08:23.720 --> 08:26.480]  He was all around the car but we didn't run.
[08:26.480 --> 08:27.480]  No, no, no.
[08:27.480 --> 08:28.480]  Wait, wait.
[08:28.480 --> 08:29.480]  You didn't answer my question.
[08:29.480 --> 08:35.280]  Was he in the front of the car when you stepped on the gas?
[08:35.280 --> 08:36.280]  Yes.
[08:36.280 --> 08:37.280]  I believe so.
[08:37.280 --> 08:39.800]  Did you hit him with the car?
[08:39.800 --> 08:40.800]  No.
[08:40.800 --> 08:51.360]  In the end, if he's taking a violent posture then that's not going to matter much.
[08:51.360 --> 08:55.520]  What is the position of the prosecutor at this point?
[08:55.520 --> 09:07.800]  He said that he told the judge in open court that the so-called Brian was not going to
[09:07.800 --> 09:17.640]  pursue any further action and that he recommended that the judge ACD it or I accept an offer
[09:17.640 --> 09:21.000]  that he ACD for six months.
[09:21.000 --> 09:22.400]  What does ACD mean?
[09:22.400 --> 09:31.760]  That if I didn't get in trouble for six months they would dismiss to charge with prejudice.
[09:31.760 --> 09:34.520]  And your problem with that is what?
[09:34.520 --> 09:36.480]  I am doing a lot of police.
[09:36.480 --> 09:38.200]  I'm going after the police.
[09:38.200 --> 09:42.920]  I'm doing my duty and I know I'm going to get arrested.
[09:42.920 --> 09:47.400]  So this is just going to drag me over to you.
[09:47.400 --> 09:53.000]  So you want to move for outright dismissal?
[09:53.000 --> 09:54.000]  Right.
[09:54.000 --> 09:58.160]  I told the judge I would like to move to dismiss the case with prejudice and if I could write
[09:58.160 --> 10:04.080]  the order up and he could sign it.
[10:04.080 --> 10:06.240]  What did the judge say?
[10:06.240 --> 10:12.200]  He said I don't understand the prosecutor just made you an offer and I said I'll explain
[10:12.200 --> 10:13.200]  it.
[10:13.200 --> 10:17.680]  I'm going after corrupt public officials and I'm going to get arrested again.
[10:17.680 --> 10:20.920]  So this is a waste of my time.
[10:20.920 --> 10:25.760]  I don't mind getting arrested if I'm doing the right thing.
[10:25.760 --> 10:26.760]  You know.
[10:26.760 --> 10:28.600]  So you refused to take the case?
[10:28.600 --> 10:31.120]  I told the judge I would do corrupt things.
[10:31.120 --> 10:32.120]  Okay.
[10:32.120 --> 10:37.040]  Did you file a written motion with the court to dismiss?
[10:37.040 --> 10:38.040]  No.
[10:38.040 --> 10:41.440]  They gave me, they're going to mail me a date that I can come back.
[10:41.440 --> 10:45.640]  They had a full house and they were busy or whatever.
[10:45.640 --> 10:49.080]  File a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution.
[10:49.080 --> 10:50.080]  Great.
[10:50.080 --> 10:53.440]  And do I do bar grievances and stuff?
[10:53.440 --> 10:58.040]  I wouldn't, get your ruling first.
[10:58.040 --> 10:59.040]  Okay.
[10:59.040 --> 11:00.040]  Okay.
[11:00.040 --> 11:03.360]  Once you got your ruling then you can grieve them all you want to.
[11:03.360 --> 11:04.360]  Okay.
[11:04.360 --> 11:08.640]  So I get a motion hearing and you know set the date and all that.
[11:08.640 --> 11:18.120]  Yeah, if you grieve them first it will give the prosecutor reason to vigorously object
[11:18.120 --> 11:20.440]  to your pleading.
[11:20.440 --> 11:29.960]  But if you just file a motion to dismiss then the prosecutor, he doesn't have a case.
[11:29.960 --> 11:37.640]  He tried to pull a bank shot on you and get you to accept this exceptionally reasonable
[11:37.640 --> 11:40.760]  deal and he gets to save some face.
[11:40.760 --> 11:43.640]  It's just a poker move.
[11:43.640 --> 11:44.640]  Right.
[11:44.640 --> 11:49.680]  He wants to get something out of it and you're not going to give him anything out of it.
[11:49.680 --> 11:55.360]  Tell him heck with it file a motion to dismiss for lack of evidence and lack of prosecution
[11:55.360 --> 11:58.560]  and almost certainly they'll give that to you.
[11:58.560 --> 12:01.240]  He's already told the judge he doesn't have a case.
[12:01.240 --> 12:02.240]  Right.
[12:02.240 --> 12:06.840]  But the judge is probably on his side and going to get some, you know, what I think is
[12:06.840 --> 12:08.840]  going to happen right now.
[12:08.840 --> 12:11.480]  Give him opportunity first.
[12:11.480 --> 12:13.080]  They're going to try to take it to trial.
[12:13.080 --> 12:17.960]  Now how do I, if they're going to, I said I would like to go to trial then and I'll
[12:17.960 --> 12:22.480]  be making my motions and stuff like that and we'll go through the motions and all that.
[12:22.480 --> 12:23.480]  Emotion hearings.
[12:23.480 --> 12:30.880]  Because I'm not going to go to trial not prepared so I want to make my motions before.
[12:30.880 --> 12:37.880]  This motion is to dismiss for lack of evidence.
[12:37.880 --> 12:38.880]  Right.
[12:38.880 --> 12:39.880]  Okay.
[12:39.880 --> 12:45.120]  Now the next thing is Chris pushed me to ask you a question about the recordings I have
[12:45.120 --> 12:48.720]  on the other officers on the other case.
[12:48.720 --> 12:55.080]  How do I get the transcripts into evidence and maybe the tape as well?
[12:55.080 --> 12:58.600]  He said you had a couple of things up your sleeve.
[12:58.600 --> 13:08.600]  You can make, you make up a transcript of what happened and state what they said verbatim.
[13:08.600 --> 13:09.600]  Right.
[13:09.600 --> 13:14.520]  You can say in the transcript, this is exactly what the officer said.
[13:14.520 --> 13:16.600]  This is exactly what I said.
[13:16.600 --> 13:19.320]  And I have officers on the tape.
[13:19.320 --> 13:23.400]  Not, this is, you know, generally this is kind of what they said and this is kind of
[13:23.400 --> 13:24.400]  what we said.
[13:24.400 --> 13:26.400]  You want to say this is exactly what was said.
[13:26.400 --> 13:33.960]  I mean, they're going to David, they know they erased the tape recording.
[13:33.960 --> 13:40.200]  So they're going to jump up and down and wave their hands and say, oh, no, no, that wasn't
[13:40.200 --> 13:47.320]  what was said and maybe one of them would be stupid enough to ask you how you know that's
[13:47.320 --> 13:51.200]  exactly what was said.
[13:51.200 --> 13:57.640]  But even if they're smarter than that, but you're saying this is exactly what was said,
[13:57.640 --> 14:01.200]  you will make the point to everyone listening.
[14:01.200 --> 14:02.200]  Right.
[14:02.200 --> 14:09.360]  If, if not, if you get an opportunity to testify, take your recorder with you and when they
[14:09.360 --> 14:17.160]  ask you what was said, put on a headset and just for a moment, play it, take off the headset
[14:17.160 --> 14:19.200]  and tell them exactly what was said.
[14:19.200 --> 14:23.200]  And let that moron over there ask you what you're listening to it.
[14:23.200 --> 14:24.200]  Great.
[14:24.200 --> 14:25.200]  Create your foundation.
[14:25.200 --> 14:26.200]  Great.
[14:26.200 --> 14:27.200]  That's one tactic.
[14:27.200 --> 14:34.280]  What if I'm not allowed to bring a tape recorder in now?
[14:34.280 --> 14:36.200]  This is part of your, this is trial.
[14:36.200 --> 14:37.200]  This is different.
[14:37.200 --> 14:38.200]  You don't need a tape recorder.
[14:38.200 --> 14:39.200]  You need a player.
[14:39.200 --> 14:40.200]  Or the player.
[14:40.200 --> 14:41.200]  Yeah.
[14:41.200 --> 14:47.200]  I'll play it on my computer because it's, because it's all, the tape is actually on a,
[14:47.200 --> 14:51.200]  on a SD card from my camera.
[14:51.200 --> 14:52.200]  Good.
[14:52.200 --> 14:53.200]  And it's playing high definition.
[14:53.200 --> 14:54.200]  Drop it into your computer.
[14:54.200 --> 14:55.200]  Perfect.
[14:55.200 --> 15:00.440]  And then just pick up your, like, take a set of earbuds and just stick one of the earbuds
[15:00.440 --> 15:06.160]  in your ear and hit the button and then tell them exactly what was said.
[15:06.160 --> 15:13.040]  One of those attorneys, somebody will get curious enough to ask the wrong question.
[15:13.040 --> 15:16.440]  And even if not, if you're in front of a jury, they're going to know exactly what you're
[15:16.440 --> 15:17.440]  doing.
[15:17.440 --> 15:18.440]  Okay.
[15:18.440 --> 15:25.040]  So they don't know about this recording and they thought they raised the other one.
[15:25.040 --> 15:33.840]  And now, how do I, I don't want to take too much time, how do I press charges on each
[15:33.840 --> 15:34.840]  individual officer?
[15:34.840 --> 15:40.240]  I might have to talk to Chris about this.
[15:40.240 --> 15:41.240]  Okay.
[15:41.240 --> 15:46.720]  So you just make up a criminal affidavit and you can look on the internet pretty well and
[15:46.720 --> 15:54.320]  just do a search in New York for criminal complaints and that will show you pretty much precisely
[15:54.320 --> 15:58.200]  how criminal complaints are structured in New York.
[15:58.200 --> 16:02.920]  And you make up the complaint and you sign it before a notary and you take it and give
[16:02.920 --> 16:07.240]  it to the judge and to any judge in their capacity as a magistrate.
[16:07.240 --> 16:11.920]  Right, so I'm not going to give it to the same judge that's the corrupt one.
[16:11.920 --> 16:14.720]  I'm going to go to the one that's the one that's even better.
[16:14.720 --> 16:19.600]  Well, he's going to talk about it and I'll have to go after him and then take it to a
[16:19.600 --> 16:20.600]  higher judge.
[16:20.600 --> 16:24.600]  We don't care what he does, we hope he doesn't take it.
[16:24.600 --> 16:25.600]  Right.
[16:25.600 --> 16:32.160]  Because when he doesn't take it, then you make up criminal complaints against him.
[16:32.160 --> 16:33.160]  Right.
[16:33.160 --> 16:39.160]  I'm going to get my ducs in a row and maybe call in Thursday.
[16:39.160 --> 16:40.160]  Okay.
[16:40.160 --> 16:41.160]  Okay.
[16:41.160 --> 16:42.160]  Okay.
[16:42.160 --> 16:43.160]  Thank you very much.
[16:43.160 --> 16:44.160]  Thank you for your call.
[16:44.160 --> 16:48.480]  This is Willis Law Radio, Randy Kelton, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[16:48.480 --> 16:49.480]  Phone lines are open.
[16:49.480 --> 16:50.480]  512-646-1984.
[16:50.480 --> 16:54.480]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[16:54.480 --> 16:57.480]  All right.
[16:57.480 --> 17:05.600]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals and coin supplies
[17:05.600 --> 17:07.600]  in the Austin Metro area.
[17:07.600 --> 17:09.400]  We also ship worldwide.
[17:09.400 --> 17:13.280]  We're a family owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin
[17:13.280 --> 17:15.120]  and metals purchases.
[17:15.120 --> 17:19.200]  Because of you, Austin, business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and
[17:19.200 --> 17:20.200]  bigger location.
[17:20.200 --> 17:26.920]  We're now located at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A, 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous
[17:26.920 --> 17:27.920]  location.
[17:27.920 --> 17:31.760]  We're on the west side of Burnett Road in the Stanley Insurance Building on the ground
[17:31.760 --> 17:35.480]  floor next to the Ishibon Sushi and the Genie Car Wash.
[17:35.480 --> 17:39.320]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 5.
[17:39.320 --> 17:45.480]  You're welcome to stop in during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440.
[17:45.480 --> 17:49.920]  Ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on Willis Law Radio or Texas Liberty
[17:49.920 --> 17:50.920]  Radio.
[17:50.920 --> 17:56.240]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion at our new location at 7304 Burnett Road, Suite A. We'll
[17:56.240 --> 18:00.400]  call 512-646-6440.
[18:00.400 --> 18:05.680]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:05.680 --> 18:09.120]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Meyers Proven Method.
[18:09.120 --> 18:13.520]  Michael Meyers has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.520 --> 18:14.520]  can win two.
[18:14.520 --> 18:19.320]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:19.320 --> 18:20.320]  civil rights statutes.
[18:20.320 --> 18:24.640]  What to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons?
[18:24.640 --> 18:26.680]  How to answer letters and phone calls?
[18:26.680 --> 18:29.280]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit reports?
[18:29.280 --> 18:33.920]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away?
[18:33.920 --> 18:39.040]  The Michael Meyers Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:39.040 --> 18:41.200]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:41.200 --> 18:46.720]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Meyers banner
[18:46.720 --> 18:49.640]  or email MichaelMeyers at yahoo.com.
[18:49.640 --> 18:57.440]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[18:57.440 --> 19:27.400]  We'll learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[19:27.400 --> 19:40.360]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig with Law Radio, and we're talking
[19:40.360 --> 19:47.880]  to Frank in New York about filing criminal complaints and I mentioned earlier about creating
[19:47.880 --> 19:57.960]  a little politics in the court and this leads naturally into due process.
[19:57.960 --> 20:05.120]  We were looking at what's going on in the courts and when we first started producing
[20:05.120 --> 20:12.440]  these lawsuits, we fully expected the courts to rule against us out of hand at every term
[20:12.440 --> 20:18.960]  and we certainly weren't disappointed in that regard, but it still helped people stay in
[20:18.960 --> 20:26.640]  their houses and that was the primary point at the time, but over time there's been more
[20:26.640 --> 20:33.720]  pressure on the courts and the issues have become more political, there's been more
[20:33.720 --> 20:38.360]  political pressure turning against the bankers.
[20:38.360 --> 20:47.320]  We have every attorney general in the country investigating the banks, we have commissions
[20:47.320 --> 20:56.360]  going after the banks, we have lawsuits, major lawsuits being adjudicated against the banks,
[20:56.360 --> 21:04.200]  we have admissions on the part of the banks that they didn't have their paperwork right
[21:04.200 --> 21:16.120]  and then we have stories in the news of massive fraud in creating false and fraudulent paperwork
[21:16.120 --> 21:23.520]  and this is some of the same paperwork that judges ignored allegations of being false
[21:23.520 --> 21:31.400]  before these news paper reports come out and now we're at a point where if we do things
[21:31.400 --> 21:42.000]  right we can increase the pressure on them and you and I can do that as per says by invoking
[21:42.000 --> 21:50.320]  tools that attorneys can't use, bar grievances, judiciconda complaints, those are two that
[21:50.320 --> 21:56.000]  we have people using to great effect.
[21:56.000 --> 22:04.360]  We also have criminal complaints, what we're accusing these people of are crimes, the
[22:04.360 --> 22:11.840]  theft by deception is just outright bonco, these guys have been stealing from all of
[22:11.840 --> 22:20.360]  us and we have people suing them and the courts are just ignoring it, knowing the accusations,
[22:20.360 --> 22:27.440]  we had a judge here in Austin tell one of the people that filed one of these suits that
[22:27.440 --> 22:33.240]  if she didn't take out every reference to criminal from the suit he would institute
[22:33.240 --> 22:41.480]  sanctions against her so I looked at that and rewrote the whole thing so that everything
[22:41.480 --> 22:47.600]  was about criminal, that the accusations we made were criminal accusations that resulted
[22:47.600 --> 22:56.480]  in civil tort and this way there is no way to take it out and I took it that the judge
[22:56.480 --> 23:04.400]  was in his own way telling us how to write the suit, that if you want to put criminal
[23:04.400 --> 23:12.400]  in put criminal in but if you're not going to do criminal then leave it out so it's time
[23:12.400 --> 23:18.240]  we went that extra step and I know a lot of people think about getting into court and
[23:18.240 --> 23:22.320]  they're kind of frightened and intimidated by the judge and nobody wants to make the
[23:22.320 --> 23:27.920]  judge mad at them and all that but you know we got people here going into court and these
[23:27.920 --> 23:39.240]  judges are absolutely corrupt but maybe they're not, maybe they have factors and influences
[23:39.240 --> 23:44.800]  that they have to deal with when I'm not aware of but it appears as though they're corrupt
[23:44.800 --> 23:52.360]  and it behooves you to act as if they are and set things up so that even if they are
[23:52.360 --> 24:01.280]  ultimately corrupt that you have a way of moving toward your outcome and one of the
[24:01.280 --> 24:08.200]  ways of doing that as opposed to say whenever the judge does something that has the appearance
[24:08.200 --> 24:19.840]  of being wrong or improper it in contravention to law if our criminal charges against him,
[24:19.840 --> 24:27.520]  if he is not a corrupt judge he's not going to take it personal, if he is a corrupt judge
[24:27.520 --> 24:36.120]  he should take it personal and it should frighten him and build political pressure for him to
[24:36.120 --> 24:41.080]  go to the attorneys on the other side and tell them do something to get this person
[24:41.080 --> 24:49.520]  off my case, your pro say there's nothing the judge can do, you file a criminal complaint
[24:49.520 --> 24:58.240]  against the judge and the judge does not dare say one word about it, you file a judicial
[24:58.240 --> 25:03.640]  conduct complaint he does not dare say one word about it, that's tampering with a witness
[25:03.640 --> 25:12.680]  obstruction of justice that gets really serious really fast so this leads to how do we go
[25:12.680 --> 25:20.600]  about doing this and we kind of have a routine of how to set him up and create politics, everything
[25:20.600 --> 25:27.080]  is political, I have a friend Ken Magnuson he's got all these rules and first one is
[25:27.080 --> 25:38.920]  perception is everything and the second one is everything is political, everything if
[25:38.920 --> 25:44.880]  you think that having the law on your side is going to win you your case you are mistaken
[25:44.880 --> 25:53.560]  you will win your case if you can manipulate the politics to your side, now being pro says
[25:53.560 --> 26:00.560]  we don't have a lot of money to buy political pressure but we do have abilities that the
[26:00.560 --> 26:07.680]  attorneys on the other side don't have in that we have the ability to invoke the law
[26:07.680 --> 26:17.080]  and have no fear of the judge, in a case where he's screwing you ever away from Sunday anyway
[26:17.080 --> 26:22.840]  you got nothing to lose if he's taking everything you got denying all your emotions out of hand
[26:22.840 --> 26:29.480]  you got nothing to lose you can only gain, the judge does not have to be your friend
[26:29.480 --> 26:36.800]  to rule on your side, we need to forget about always being the nice guy, the nice guy's
[26:36.800 --> 26:49.440]  finished last, the squeaky wheel that's the one that gets degrees so if you have a situation
[26:49.440 --> 26:55.440]  where the court fails to apply the law to the facts then you can file a judicial conduct
[26:55.440 --> 27:03.680]  complaint but if you have a situation like we have someone we just talked to today about
[27:03.680 --> 27:11.080]  they had a judge issue warrant and in the statement in support of the warrant the judge committed
[27:11.080 --> 27:20.680]  aggravated perjury, now it's not enough to go after that judge with a judicial conduct
[27:20.680 --> 27:28.760]  complaint, this is not judicial conduct, judicial conduct is where a judge misuses his office
[27:28.760 --> 27:38.440]  or fails to perform a duty in a way that he's required to, this is criminal act, this is
[27:38.440 --> 27:47.200]  aggravated perjury is a felony in most states and just because he's a judge he has no immunity
[27:47.200 --> 27:54.200]  from that, now don't expect that you can get a judge actually prosecute it, that's not
[27:54.200 --> 28:03.360]  what we're after, we're after politics, that's why we have process filed bar grievances,
[28:03.360 --> 28:11.640]  you get politics, you double the attorney's malpractice insurance, you file a second one,
[28:11.640 --> 28:22.040]  you get it cancelled altogether, that's politics, that gives separate dynamics other than purely
[28:22.040 --> 28:27.640]  the legal considerations in the case, judicial conduct complaint against the judge, criminal
[28:27.640 --> 28:34.560]  charges against the judge, it gives the judge a secondary reason for wanting you out of
[28:34.560 --> 28:44.000]  his courtroom, so back to how we do that, whatever state you're in, just go on the internet,
[28:44.000 --> 28:50.280]  do a search for criminal complaints in your state name and you may take it a little digging
[28:50.280 --> 28:54.840]  around but you'll find a copy of a complaint filed against someone, look at the format,
[28:54.840 --> 29:00.480]  it's almost always the same, there's minor differences in the headings, but for the most
[29:00.480 --> 29:05.880]  part they're all the same, a complaint must run in the name of the state, under the name
[29:05.880 --> 29:15.800]  authority of the state, Texas, I Randall Kelton, and this is a phrase that's in most complaint,
[29:15.800 --> 29:23.360]  I Randall Kelton have reason to believe and do believe, I'm not sure about all the other
[29:23.360 --> 29:31.720]  states but in Texas and do believe must be in there, it just comes out of the court cases
[29:31.720 --> 29:39.720]  that's been run through the system, and when we come back I'll finish up on how to prepare
[29:39.720 --> 29:46.400]  a complaint and then show you how to use that complaint to beat them up big time, this is
[29:46.400 --> 29:53.720]  Randy Kelton, David Stevens, Eddie Craig with La Radio, the caller line is open 512-646-1984,
[29:53.720 --> 30:04.760]  we'll be right back, I lost my son, my nephew, my uncle, my son, September 11th, 2000, most
[30:04.760 --> 30:09.480]  people don't know that a third tower fell on September 11th, World Trade Center 7, a
[30:09.480 --> 30:14.720]  47 story skyscraper was not hit by a plane, well the official explanation is that fire
[30:14.720 --> 30:19.920]  brought down building 7, over 1200 architects and engineers have looked into the evidence
[30:19.920 --> 30:24.520]  and believed there is more to the story, bring justice to my son, my uncle, my nephew, my
[30:24.520 --> 30:34.080]  son, go to building what.org, why it fell, why it matters, as what you can do, tales about
[30:34.080 --> 30:40.040]  tongues are twisted, tales about tongues are twisted, tales about tongues, feel try saying
[30:40.040 --> 30:43.840]  that three times fast, I'm Dr. Catherine Albright and I'll be back in just a moment
[30:43.840 --> 30:47.120]  with the truth about tongues and taste buds.
[30:47.120 --> 30:51.480]  Privacy is under attack, when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back
[30:51.480 --> 30:57.080]  again and once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too,
[30:57.080 --> 31:02.120]  so protect your rights, say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself.
[31:02.120 --> 31:06.680]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto, this public service announcement is brought to you by
[31:06.680 --> 31:14.040]  StartPage.com, the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo and Bing, start over with
[31:14.040 --> 31:15.640]  StartPage.
[31:15.640 --> 31:20.640]  Time-worn tales about tongues are a tall tale, remember the tongue map for a sweet sour
[31:20.640 --> 31:25.680]  salty and bitter you learned in school, scientists now say we can taste these flavors anywhere
[31:25.680 --> 31:30.240]  on our tongues, what's more we can also taste these flavors through taste receptors on the
[31:30.240 --> 31:35.640]  roof of our mouths and even on our epiglottis, the flap that covers the windpipe and forget
[31:35.640 --> 31:40.680]  having just 4 tastes, there are now 5 official tastes with the addition of umami, umami
[31:40.680 --> 31:45.840]  is the savory taste of glutamate and amino acid found in foods like potato chips, turns
[31:45.840 --> 31:50.600]  out we can taste umami flavors with more than our mouths, we can taste it with our tummies
[31:50.600 --> 31:51.600]  too.
[31:51.600 --> 32:09.640]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:09.640 --> 32:32.760]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:32.760 --> 32:50.800]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:50.800 --> 33:13.840]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, more news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[33:13.840 --> 33:32.160]  Okay, we're back, Randy Kelsen, Debbie Stevens, Eddie Craig with our radio and we were talking
[33:32.160 --> 33:37.160]  about criminal complaints and how to file them.
[33:37.160 --> 33:45.720]  It's always a good idea to look up some criminal complaints first and see how they're structured
[33:45.720 --> 33:52.240]  in your state and generally the local police, especially if you're filing against a public
[33:52.240 --> 33:55.680]  official, they're not going to be helpful at all.
[33:55.680 --> 33:59.880]  So generally we don't even mess with the police.
[33:59.880 --> 34:04.920]  The only time I file a complaint with the police is if I'm after the department.
[34:04.920 --> 34:12.560]  But if I don't want to engage the department in criminal charges or a suit, I go right
[34:12.560 --> 34:21.680]  straight to a magistrate and here in Texas I often file my first complaint with a prosecuting
[34:21.680 --> 34:30.120]  attorney because I always want to set him up and this is all about strategy.
[34:30.120 --> 34:36.280]  So we all need to look at how things work in the states that we live in.
[34:36.280 --> 34:42.240]  But for the most part we have a prosecutor and it's his duty to prosecute.
[34:42.240 --> 34:48.480]  So I like to take complaints to prosecutors that they are absolutely not going to want
[34:48.480 --> 34:54.040]  to prosecute and that's a complaint against the public official when the public official
[34:54.040 --> 35:00.680]  is doing what public officials do, acting in accordance with established policy and
[35:00.680 --> 35:01.680]  procedure.
[35:01.680 --> 35:07.880]  The last thing the prosecutor is going to want to do is prosecute one of them or a law
[35:07.880 --> 35:14.280]  firm or a bank with deep pockets.
[35:14.280 --> 35:18.320]  This prosecutor is going to want to get elected next time and he's not going to want this
[35:18.320 --> 35:23.320]  bank funding his opponent.
[35:23.320 --> 35:24.320]  That's politics.
[35:24.320 --> 35:25.320]  That's not law.
[35:25.320 --> 35:28.080]  There are a number of issues out there that has nothing to do with law and this is one
[35:28.080 --> 35:29.920]  of them.
[35:29.920 --> 35:34.240]  We need to understand the politics that are out there and learn how to use them.
[35:34.240 --> 35:44.840]  So what we do is say we have a law firm here or a judge or a bank that's acting outside
[35:44.840 --> 35:45.840]  law.
[35:45.840 --> 35:48.200]  You make up the complaint.
[35:48.200 --> 35:55.600]  Say it's not, let's put a purpose of demonstration, in this case it's not a public official that
[35:55.600 --> 35:57.960]  starts things.
[35:57.960 --> 36:07.360]  So you make up a criminal complaint against the law firm or the bank or some officer of
[36:07.360 --> 36:08.360]  the bank.
[36:08.360 --> 36:13.320]  Always the criminal complaint is against an individual.
[36:13.320 --> 36:21.440]  You take that to the prosecuting attorney and you take it to him in the form of a verified
[36:21.440 --> 36:25.600]  criminal affidavit.
[36:25.600 --> 36:32.480]  You don't have to put a statement of facts in the complaint itself.
[36:32.480 --> 36:36.040]  You can attach that to it as an affidavit.
[36:36.040 --> 36:40.600]  But I tend to write my criminal complaint and include the statement of facts in the
[36:40.600 --> 36:44.720]  criminal complaint.
[36:44.720 --> 36:52.760]  That's for economy and each criminal complaint that I file on a given issue or in one set
[36:52.760 --> 36:55.720]  of circumstances I may have two or three actors.
[36:55.720 --> 36:59.120]  I'll write the same complaint up and put a different name on each one.
[36:59.120 --> 37:04.040]  That way the court reads the same set of facts over and over again and has a way of sticking
[37:04.040 --> 37:05.040]  in the mind.
[37:05.040 --> 37:12.640]  But I take the complaints initially to the prosecuting attorney and get him to refuse
[37:12.640 --> 37:15.640]  to act on them.
[37:15.640 --> 37:22.440]  I know that's counterintuitive, but if we're going to win this we need to understand the
[37:22.440 --> 37:28.080]  prosecuting attorney is not going to want to prosecute a hard case and he's not going
[37:28.080 --> 37:33.280]  to want to prosecute someone of any prominence, he's not going to want to prosecute another
[37:33.280 --> 37:37.560]  attorney and he's certainly not going to want to prosecute a judge.
[37:37.560 --> 37:42.400]  So we give him the opportunity to do whatever he wants to.
[37:42.400 --> 37:48.720]  And when he refuses to act on the complaints then you accuse the prosecutor of obstructing
[37:48.720 --> 37:55.320]  justice and trying to shield these people from prosecution and you take that to a judge
[37:55.320 --> 37:59.840]  or I suggest you made it to the judge, never let them see you.
[37:59.840 --> 38:02.840]  Do everything in writing.
[38:02.840 --> 38:08.560]  Use the complaint to verify criminal affidavit to the prosecuting attorney when he refuses
[38:08.560 --> 38:09.560]  to act on it.
[38:09.560 --> 38:17.240]  You send a verified criminal affidavit against the attorney to the highest level judge you
[38:17.240 --> 38:20.680]  can find.
[38:20.680 --> 38:26.320]  Verified criminal affidavit with a statement, the attached statement of probable cause.
[38:26.320 --> 38:30.440]  And when the judge refuses to, and you put a letter in there, you put in a stamp, self-addressed
[38:30.440 --> 38:31.440]  envelope.
[38:31.440 --> 38:39.520]  That's what he's filing, asking the attorney or the judge to notify you of when these complaints
[38:39.520 --> 38:44.840]  will be presented to a grand jury and getting the stamp, self-addressed envelope, make it
[38:44.840 --> 38:48.680]  easy for them to send you a letter back telling you they're not going to do anything about
[38:48.680 --> 38:50.480]  it.
[38:50.480 --> 38:56.360]  So when you get the letter or if you wait a reasonable amount of time, say two weeks
[38:56.360 --> 39:02.560]  and no letter shows up, then that's a reasonable probable cause to believe that either the
[39:02.560 --> 39:08.720]  prosecutor or the judge threw it in trash and it's not going to do anything.
[39:08.720 --> 39:16.520]  So then you bring, once you've done the judge, then you bring a criminal complaint back to
[39:16.520 --> 39:23.760]  the grand jury, you make a set of complaints against the judge, accusing the judge of shielding
[39:23.760 --> 39:30.360]  the prosecutor from prosecution, and you send that to the prosecutor's office addressed
[39:30.360 --> 39:41.120]  to the grand jury, but you send that one registered, restricted so that only the person named can
[39:41.120 --> 39:42.120]  sign for it.
[39:42.120 --> 39:48.560]  Well, the kid in the mailroom signed for it anyway, they generally do, and the prosecutor
[39:48.560 --> 39:54.320]  would get it, and when he opens it and sees that you filed criminal charges against the
[39:54.320 --> 40:00.400]  judge for not taking action against him, he's going to realize you set him up.
[40:00.400 --> 40:05.640]  It's your lead, Miss Puppy, down the garden path, and he's doing exactly what you want
[40:05.640 --> 40:06.640]  him to.
[40:06.640 --> 40:13.560]  That is not going to make him happy to think he's been hoodwinked, and now he's worried
[40:13.560 --> 40:19.240]  what you really have up your sleeve, because now you're asking him to give these to the
[40:19.240 --> 40:29.000]  grand jury, and when he does not, you go, now you can go to the feds and file criminal charges
[40:29.000 --> 40:32.960]  with the feds, and they're not going to do anything.
[40:32.960 --> 40:42.280]  But one thing that always happens when this occurs is everybody calls everybody, and their
[40:42.280 --> 40:50.360]  biggest concern is that grand jury, problem with grand jury is you never know what they're
[40:50.360 --> 40:51.360]  going to do.
[40:51.360 --> 40:57.400]  I had a prosecutor attorney tell me that, he said, sometimes I'd bring him a case, and
[40:57.400 --> 41:03.320]  I got this guy dead bang, I got all of the evidence I need, he's got a long criminal
[41:03.320 --> 41:09.080]  history, and the grand jury doesn't indict, and then I bring in somebody that I really
[41:09.080 --> 41:13.600]  didn't think should be prosecuted, but it wasn't my call, so I'm the prosecutor, this
[41:13.600 --> 41:18.520]  is my job, and they indict him, they just never know what they're going to do.
[41:18.520 --> 41:24.680]  And that is a wonderful thing to hear, you never know.
[41:24.680 --> 41:30.760]  So when you start pushing criminal complaints against the judge and the prosecutor, because
[41:30.760 --> 41:38.320]  the prosecutor wouldn't act on complaints against this banker, the judge can't come
[41:38.320 --> 41:47.240]  to you and say a word to you about it, that'd be obstructing justice, judge doesn't dare,
[41:47.240 --> 41:56.800]  but he can go to the prosecutor and tell him, do something, make this go away, I am not
[41:56.800 --> 42:04.240]  going to lose my job to save your job, and what do you think the prosecutor is going
[42:04.240 --> 42:10.400]  to say to this banker or whoever you're filing against?
[42:10.400 --> 42:15.880]  You guys better make this go away, because the judge is upset at me, and I'm not going
[42:15.880 --> 42:20.400]  to lose my job for you.
[42:20.400 --> 42:25.720]  That's how you get politics into real world, and that's certainly how it works in the
[42:25.720 --> 42:32.800]  world that I live in, the judge cannot come to you and raise an issue about you trying
[42:32.800 --> 42:42.280]  to get him arrested, he does not dare, one word about that, you'll be back filing obstruction
[42:42.280 --> 42:51.720]  of justice tampering with the witness, and in the process, if a police officer, a constable,
[42:51.720 --> 42:59.560]  a bailiff, anyone says anything to you you don't like or does anything that can be construed
[42:59.560 --> 43:08.320]  as being in any way threatening or intimidating, you choose that judge to do it, you choose
[43:08.320 --> 43:13.720]  that judge because you file criminal charges against him, of personally sending that officer
[43:13.720 --> 43:21.600]  out to harass and intimidate you in order to tamper with the witness, now generally the
[43:21.600 --> 43:28.480]  best one to file against is the innocent party, because he's going to scream bloody murder,
[43:28.480 --> 43:34.360]  and this judge starts getting accused of sending this moron policeman out there to act like
[43:34.360 --> 43:41.160]  an idiot, the judge is going to really, really be unhappy, and you won't have any problem
[43:41.160 --> 43:48.560]  with the police harassing you or messing with you, so, okay, when we come back I'm going
[43:48.560 --> 43:56.000]  to take Gary from Georgia, and we got Doug on the line, this is Randy Caldera, Stephen
[43:56.000 --> 44:00.560]  Jerry Craig, we have a lot of radio, we'll be right back.
[44:00.560 --> 44:03.760]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:03.760 --> 44:10.520]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[44:10.520 --> 44:17.160]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step, if you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer
[44:17.160 --> 44:23.000]  should be doing, if you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself, thousands
[44:23.000 --> 44:28.960]  have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too, Jurisdictionary was created
[44:28.960 --> 44:36.000]  by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience, even if you're not in a lawsuit,
[44:36.000 --> 44:41.000]  you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control
[44:41.000 --> 44:47.640]  our American courts, you'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms
[44:47.640 --> 44:54.880]  for civil cases, prosay tactics, and much more, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click
[44:54.880 --> 44:59.400]  on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[44:59.400 --> 45:04.720]  Hey, did you hear, Ron Paul has announced he's running for president in 2012.
[45:04.720 --> 45:05.720]  Who's Ron Paul?
[45:05.720 --> 45:06.720]  Really?
[45:06.720 --> 45:09.600]  Okay, put down the cell phone for one minute, your friends really don't care about your
[45:09.600 --> 45:11.240]  Twitter updates on what you had for breakfast.
[45:11.240 --> 45:14.680]  Oh, but I love to make those little smiley faces with punctuation marks.
[45:14.680 --> 45:15.680]  Of course you do.
[45:15.680 --> 45:19.040]  Now, listen closely, you need to go down to Brave New Books and learn as much as you can
[45:19.040 --> 45:21.640]  about Ron Paul and his message before it's too late.
[45:21.640 --> 45:24.360]  They have all of his books and many of the books he talks about.
[45:24.360 --> 45:28.000]  They also have t-shirts, bumper stickers, and yard signs so that you can show your support
[45:28.000 --> 45:29.000]  for him during the campaign.
[45:29.000 --> 45:30.000]  Brave New Books?
[45:30.000 --> 45:32.120]  Did they have Harry Potter and Twilight?
[45:32.120 --> 45:36.240]  No, but they do carry a large selection of survival and preparedness books to protect
[45:36.240 --> 45:37.800]  your family in time of emergency.
[45:37.800 --> 45:40.520]  Ugh, that sounds like that show on the Discovery Channel.
[45:40.520 --> 45:44.040]  Yeah, there's even a wilderness survival expert that teaches classes called Earth
[45:44.040 --> 45:48.280]  Skills School that you can sign up for on the website bravenewbookstore.com.
[45:48.280 --> 45:49.280]  What are you doing?
[45:49.280 --> 45:52.760]  I'm tweeting all my friends that they should go to bravenewbookstore.com or down to the
[45:52.760 --> 45:53.760]  bookstore in person.
[45:53.760 --> 45:54.760]  Where's it located?
[45:54.760 --> 45:55.760]  1904 Guadalupe Street.
[45:55.760 --> 45:56.760]  There, it's sent.
[45:56.760 --> 45:57.760]  I even made a smiley face.
[45:57.760 --> 46:23.760]  Great.
[46:23.760 --> 46:39.760]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig with La Radio.
[46:39.760 --> 46:45.840]  We're back and we were talking about due process and violent criminal complaints.
[46:45.840 --> 46:56.440]  A couple things to state about that, we spoke about judicial immunity earlier, and I was
[46:56.440 --> 47:03.000]  looking at judicial immunity a short while ago for a couple of people.
[47:03.000 --> 47:07.680]  And one thing that did come across was criminal complaints.
[47:07.680 --> 47:15.720]  When you file a criminal complaint, you have exactly the same immunity they claim for judges.
[47:15.720 --> 47:23.480]  Say the police want the public to be their partners in preventing crime.
[47:23.480 --> 47:27.640]  They want the public to report crime.
[47:27.640 --> 47:35.160]  So they had to create procedures that would make it such that you could report crime and
[47:35.160 --> 47:40.240]  not be afraid to be ensued every time you accuse someone of something.
[47:40.240 --> 47:47.960]  So when you file a criminal complaint, you are absolutely immune from civil litigation.
[47:47.960 --> 47:56.400]  Now if you falsify a statement of material fact, you can be subject to criminal prosecution
[47:56.400 --> 48:03.080]  for perjury, but you cannot be sued, period.
[48:03.080 --> 48:10.240]  So essentially, you're safe, and besides, when you start filing criminal complaints,
[48:10.240 --> 48:17.720]  now you put the police and the courts all in a position to where they have to be extremely
[48:17.720 --> 48:26.120]  careful with you, because if they say anything threatening and intimidating, like for instance,
[48:26.120 --> 48:33.840]  I was in court the last time, the prosecuting attorney told my attorney who I'd had appointed
[48:33.840 --> 48:39.680]  and threatened him with bar grievances, and he got real serious, and it gave him plausible
[48:39.680 --> 48:45.400]  deniability so he could actually fight the case, told me that the prosecutor said she
[48:45.400 --> 48:51.400]  knew who I was, and if I started filing criminal complaints, she was going to charge me with
[48:51.400 --> 48:56.200]  tampering with the government document.
[48:56.200 --> 49:00.520]  I said, oh, she was, I said, well, here, I got about 30, get her over here, I want her
[49:00.520 --> 49:05.520]  to verify these in accordance with her duty under Article 2.06 code of criminal procedure.
[49:05.520 --> 49:12.320]  Well, she wouldn't come over and do that, but when I filed a suit against Travis County,
[49:12.320 --> 49:20.240]  I'm going to name that action as an act intended to intimidate, to tamper with a witness and
[49:20.240 --> 49:23.680]  obstruct justice.
[49:23.680 --> 49:32.160]  Once you file the complaint, you take on a special status, and you are protected, anybody
[49:32.160 --> 49:40.160]  mess with you now, they're stepping off into deep water, and I always like to get a complaint
[49:40.160 --> 49:44.160]  against a judge for not arresting the prosecutor.
[49:44.160 --> 49:46.160]  That puts them on the dime.
[49:46.160 --> 49:51.480]  Now if a policeman says anything to you, you don't like, you accuse the judge of sending
[49:51.480 --> 49:57.680]  that person out to threaten and intimidate you because you file criminal charges against
[49:57.680 --> 50:04.200]  the judge, then if the judge is innocent, all that much better because the judge is going
[50:04.200 --> 50:06.640]  to be irate against police officer.
[50:06.640 --> 50:10.960]  But anyway, back to the lender.
[50:10.960 --> 50:19.160]  If you're filing charges against them for fraud, especially in this political climate,
[50:19.160 --> 50:24.760]  there is very good chance the prosecutor will pick it up as a political football to make
[50:24.760 --> 50:32.960]  him look good at his next election because you know, prosecutors, they don't make friends
[50:32.960 --> 50:36.160]  when they do their job for the most part.
[50:36.160 --> 50:38.440]  They get a lot of people unhappy with them.
[50:38.440 --> 50:46.200]  So if they get an opportunity to make some political hay with their constituents, there's
[50:46.200 --> 50:50.880]  a good chance we'll get a prosecutor to pick up some of this.
[50:50.880 --> 50:57.240]  And if anybody in the country gets prosecuted, everybody else will know about it, and we'd
[50:57.240 --> 50:59.280]  get them all shaking in their boots.
[50:59.280 --> 51:04.480]  But even if you can't get them prosecuted, you start putting pressure on them and run
[51:04.480 --> 51:11.600]  the routine on them, prosecutors are going to start telling these banksters, you need
[51:11.600 --> 51:13.960]  to do something.
[51:13.960 --> 51:17.120]  Make this go away.
[51:17.120 --> 51:19.400]  That's how we create politics.
[51:19.400 --> 51:23.160]  That's how we give them a secondary reason to give us what we want.
[51:23.160 --> 51:25.480]  Okay, I've gone through this enough.
[51:25.480 --> 51:28.560]  I think I've bored everybody to tears with it.
[51:28.560 --> 51:31.400]  Now I'm going to go to Gary from Georgia.
[51:31.400 --> 51:35.600]  I know he has something in intelligence and insightful to say.
[51:35.600 --> 51:36.600]  Hello, Gary.
[51:36.600 --> 51:38.600]  It has been a while.
[51:38.600 --> 51:40.600]  Yes, sir, Randy.
[51:40.600 --> 51:41.600]  I apologize.
[51:41.600 --> 51:49.320]  I haven't sent emails because I changed my email address from AOL, but still doing a
[51:49.320 --> 51:56.560]  lot of research and the topic tonight is how to follow criminal complaints, really, against
[51:56.560 --> 51:57.560]  anyone.
[51:57.560 --> 52:05.480]  And that is the foundation of American jurisprudence, is you have to have an injured victim to
[52:05.480 --> 52:09.800]  have what's known as standing for people who don't know.
[52:09.800 --> 52:20.240]  But before, a private citizen has just as much right as a police officer to file a complaint.
[52:20.240 --> 52:27.720]  The way it goes is that the injured party has to say, Mr. Gary from Georgia, injured
[52:27.720 --> 52:34.120]  me, has to swear in all to that effect, as he said, the other side of the coin and get
[52:34.120 --> 52:35.120]  him for burglary.
[52:35.120 --> 52:36.120]  Hold on, Gary.
[52:36.120 --> 52:41.120]  There's a lot to add in a little something there.
[52:41.120 --> 52:43.840]  Absolutely, sure.
[52:43.840 --> 52:53.600]  If you observed Eddie commit this heinous crime, but you are terrified of Eddie, and
[52:53.600 --> 52:59.000]  you're afraid to say anything about it, and you tell me that you have personal knowledge
[52:59.000 --> 53:05.640]  that Eddie committed this heinous crime, and I believe you.
[53:05.640 --> 53:13.520]  I have exactly the same duty to report that crime as the injured party would.
[53:13.520 --> 53:21.560]  I have exactly the same standing to report that crime as the injured party would.
[53:21.560 --> 53:29.200]  As a matter of fact, if it is a felony and I don't report it, I can go to prison for
[53:29.200 --> 53:31.640]  that.
[53:31.640 --> 53:40.400]  So absolutely you can never be punished for doing what you can go to prison for not doing.
[53:40.400 --> 53:49.200]  But the point was, you don't have to be that injured party to report the crime.
[53:49.200 --> 53:55.960]  Let me interject here, sir, but then you have to have a probable cause, because if the duty
[53:55.960 --> 54:02.000]  of the police officer, of course, is to protect health and safety welfare of the public and
[54:02.000 --> 54:07.360]  regulate commerce, well, no, he don't regulate commerce, protect health safety and morals
[54:07.360 --> 54:15.360]  of the public under his police powers, but get to that standing, it's his duty to investigate
[54:15.360 --> 54:18.720]  the truth of what somebody told him.
[54:18.720 --> 54:25.800]  Now, it's nice that we have crime stoppers, and you get a thousand dollars reward, but
[54:25.800 --> 54:27.960]  then you don't have to give your name.
[54:27.960 --> 54:31.720]  Well, to me, I object to that.
[54:31.720 --> 54:38.200]  I don't believe it because you have a right to confrontation of a witness, and it goes
[54:38.200 --> 54:46.280]  to a who says in every case in America, including the IRS and all that we have received, payment
[54:46.280 --> 54:47.280]  to the astronauts.
[54:47.280 --> 54:55.080]  So you have a right to confront the we start ever who is doing the test, right?
[54:55.080 --> 55:03.880]  Okay, well, that would be the case in the court, but this is a separate case in that
[55:03.880 --> 55:07.080]  it's not to a court yet.
[55:07.080 --> 55:14.560]  And the person that's making the report can be wrong, they can be mistaken.
[55:14.560 --> 55:21.280]  So long as they don't commit perjury, if I have reason to believe and do believe that
[55:21.280 --> 55:26.760]  a crime has been committed, I have a duty to report it.
[55:26.760 --> 55:31.880]  But the reporting of a crime harms no one.
[55:31.880 --> 55:35.840]  And like you said, there must be probable cause.
[55:35.840 --> 55:43.640]  And that's what the magistrates were put there for a police officer when he receives notification
[55:43.640 --> 55:47.360]  that someone has reason to believe a crime has been committed.
[55:47.360 --> 55:55.320]  He can't go report that crime yet because when he reports that crime, he doesn't do that
[55:55.320 --> 55:58.960]  in his capacity as a police officer.
[55:58.960 --> 56:06.080]  He does that in his personal individual capacity, just like you, just like me.
[56:06.080 --> 56:13.040]  So before he can before he can go to the court and state to the court, I have reason to believe
[56:13.040 --> 56:14.600]  and do believe.
[56:14.600 --> 56:22.680]  He has to take the statement of the witness or the person who does have reason to believe
[56:22.680 --> 56:24.920]  and investigate it himself.
[56:24.920 --> 56:30.720]  And if he can find evidence that gives him reason to believe, gives him probable cause,
[56:30.720 --> 56:34.720]  then he has a duty to take that to the court.
[56:34.720 --> 56:39.360]  Now he happens to have a special duty to investigate this kind of stuff.
[56:39.360 --> 56:41.760]  That's his police capacity.
[56:41.760 --> 56:47.760]  And he's not, he can't otherwise is here for it.
[56:47.760 --> 56:48.760]  Right.
[56:48.760 --> 56:49.760]  Okay.
[56:49.760 --> 56:50.760]  Okay.
[56:50.760 --> 56:51.760]  Hold on.
[56:51.760 --> 57:00.280]  In a criminal complaint, hearsay is sufficient because the hearsay must be brought to the
[57:00.280 --> 57:10.680]  court and that can be presented to the court for the purpose of making a determination of
[57:10.680 --> 57:13.400]  probable cause.
[57:13.400 --> 57:16.760]  But that's all the hearsay can be used for.
[57:16.760 --> 57:23.480]  If the court comes away with reason to believe that a crime has been committed and reason
[57:23.480 --> 57:29.200]  to believe this person committed the crime, then he can issue a warrant or simply issue
[57:29.200 --> 57:30.200]  a summons.
[57:30.200 --> 57:37.960]  Say, we had this hearing, but you weren't here and they said bad stuff about you.
[57:37.960 --> 57:46.040]  You need to come to me so we can have another hearing and hear your side.
[57:46.040 --> 57:51.040]  And once I've heard your side, then we'll make a determination of whether or not there's
[57:51.040 --> 57:55.400]  sufficient cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that you committed that
[57:55.400 --> 57:56.400]  crime.
[57:56.400 --> 58:00.560]  And then we can ask you to stand and answer for the crime.
[58:00.560 --> 58:08.240]  From that point on, hearsay is not sufficient.
[58:08.240 --> 58:09.240]  Hang on, Gary.
[58:09.240 --> 58:13.360]  We'll come back to you on the other side and I want a good rebuttal.
[58:13.360 --> 58:15.360]  Kick my butt if I'm wrong.
[58:15.360 --> 58:16.360]  This is...
[58:16.360 --> 58:17.360]  That's all I want.
[58:17.360 --> 58:18.360]  Thank you, Celtic.
[58:18.360 --> 58:19.360]  You ever see the deadly plague?
[58:19.360 --> 58:20.360]  We've got a video.
[58:20.360 --> 58:30.360]  It would be right back on the other side, the phone lines are open, five, one, two, six,
[58:30.360 --> 58:31.520]  seven, eight.
[58:31.520 --> 58:42.480]  Call us, we'll ask more questions and see if you can stop the jumps.
[58:42.480 --> 58:59.940]  It'll give you right back.
[58:59.940 --> 59:05.540]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world, yet countless readers are frustrated
[59:05.540 --> 59:08.340]  because they struggle to understand it.
[59:08.340 --> 59:13.740]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text, but in the process can compromise
[59:13.740 --> 59:16.980]  the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:16.980 --> 59:18.740]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:18.740 --> 59:24.700]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate, but the real story is the more
[59:24.700 --> 59:28.420]  than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:28.420 --> 59:33.580]  Old and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way, providing an entrance into
[59:33.580 --> 59:38.100]  the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:38.100 --> 59:43.260]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:43.260 --> 59:53.700]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:53.700 --> 59:57.740]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.740 --> 01:00:04.420]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[01:00:04.420 --> 01:00:09.180]  Sources close to US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner say he is considering stepping down
[01:00:09.180 --> 01:00:14.420]  later this year, but will not make a decision until negotiations over the US debt ceiling
[01:00:14.420 --> 01:00:15.920]  are completed.
[01:00:15.920 --> 01:00:20.940]  General Electric Chief Jeff Immelt, who heads a council advising the White House, New York
[01:00:20.940 --> 01:00:28.180]  Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and J.P. Morgan Chase Chairman Jamie Dimon are potential replacements.
[01:00:28.180 --> 01:00:32.060]  Arlington, Texas police are testing the use of drones.
[01:00:32.060 --> 01:00:37.780]  The department has been evaluating two battery-operated remote-control aircraft away from populated
[01:00:37.780 --> 01:00:38.780]  areas.
[01:00:38.780 --> 01:00:44.940]  The model helicopter-like drones, just 20 inches long, can carry cameras that shoot high-quality
[01:00:44.940 --> 01:00:49.460]  still pictures and videos and have night vision capability.
[01:00:49.460 --> 01:00:53.220]  And Kimberly Franklin said, quote, I'm opposed to the drones.
[01:00:53.220 --> 01:00:56.820]  There is definitely an invasion of privacy factor.
[01:00:56.820 --> 01:01:03.020]  Venezuela President Hugo Chavez admitted Thursday he had undergone a successful operation
[01:01:03.020 --> 01:01:07.580]  to remove a cancer tumor in Cuba and was on the road to full recovery.
[01:01:07.580 --> 01:01:13.740]  Comparing his health problem to the short-lived US Act coup against him in 2002, Chavez said,
[01:01:13.740 --> 01:01:15.940]  I want to talk to you about the rising sun.
[01:01:15.940 --> 01:01:17.540]  I think we have emerged.
[01:01:17.540 --> 01:01:23.260]  U.S. drone strikes in Somalia that wounded two leaders of the Al-Shabaab militant group
[01:01:23.260 --> 01:01:29.060]  last week coincided with the unveiling of a new U.S. counterterrorism strategy that
[01:01:29.060 --> 01:01:33.980]  has shifted the war on terror from battlefields to covert operations.
[01:01:33.980 --> 01:01:40.300]  In the new national strategy for counterterrorism, John Brennan, Barack Obama's top anti-terrorism
[01:01:40.300 --> 01:01:45.180]  adviser, made no mention of the Bush-era global war on terror.
[01:01:45.180 --> 01:01:50.380]  Brennan insisted Al Qaeda remained a threat, but since Obama has taken office, Al Qaeda's
[01:01:50.380 --> 01:01:53.220]  leadership has been, quote, decimated.
[01:01:53.220 --> 01:01:58.100]  Brennan said America's new counterterrorism strategy relies on intelligence and special
[01:01:58.100 --> 01:02:04.460]  operation forces backed by the rapid deployment of what he called unique assets, a reference
[01:02:04.460 --> 01:02:07.100]  to smaller and deadlier drones.
[01:02:07.100 --> 01:02:12.180]  Critics say the shift toward covert operations will shield the military, currently enmeshed
[01:02:12.180 --> 01:02:16.260]  in numerous theaters of war from public scrutiny.
[01:02:16.260 --> 01:02:22.660]  Outgoing CIA director Leon Panetta was sworn in as Defense Secretary Friday.
[01:02:22.660 --> 01:02:27.820]  The U.S. has rejected demands by Pakistani officials to abandon the Shamsi military base
[01:02:27.820 --> 01:02:30.420]  used by the CIA for drone strikes.
[01:02:30.420 --> 01:02:35.500]  The U.S. declaration that drone operations in Pakistan will continue unabated is the
[01:02:35.500 --> 01:02:41.260]  latest twist in a fraught relationship between security authorities in Washington and Islamabad.
[01:02:41.260 --> 01:02:46.460]  John Brennan, Barack Obama's top counter-terrorism adviser, rejected suggestions that U.N. drone
[01:02:46.460 --> 01:02:52.420]  attacks had caused numerous civilian casualties, claiming not a single collateral death had
[01:02:52.420 --> 01:02:57.060]  been caused by U.S. counter-terrorism operations over the last year.
[01:02:57.060 --> 01:03:10.780]  For details on these stories, visit INN404.net You are listening to the Rural Law Radio Network
[01:03:10.780 --> 01:03:17.300]  at RuralLawRadio.com, live free speech talk radio at its best.
[01:03:17.300 --> 01:03:45.900]  Okay, we're back, Randy Kelton, W. Steele, Teddy Craig, RuralLaw Radio, we're talking
[01:03:45.900 --> 01:03:55.900]  to Gary from Georgia, Gary, tear me apart.
[01:03:55.900 --> 01:04:06.700]  Comment, what you said is totally, I won't say it's true because of the probable cause
[01:04:06.700 --> 01:04:15.140]  factor and I mean it's nice to report a crime because on the other side of the coin we got
[01:04:15.140 --> 01:04:23.340]  18 unabated accessory after the fact and that's what these judges are doing and we're not
[01:04:23.340 --> 01:04:33.060]  just judges, they're from attorneys, sheriffs and I'm one of the favorite people I have
[01:04:33.060 --> 01:04:38.260]  here is called the Grants Cops in Georgia where they won't put you in jail for not cutting
[01:04:38.260 --> 01:04:48.660]  grass, that's crazy but it's certainly open to attack and so the rest of the story on
[01:04:48.660 --> 01:04:57.980]  this as far as criminal complaints go against public officials, what I use is give you a
[01:04:57.980 --> 01:05:08.980]  good case, say where there's 20, I have a case where there's 20 counts of male fraud,
[01:05:08.980 --> 01:05:20.220]  FBI agent, county securities, staff of honest services, conspiracy to commit male fraud
[01:05:20.220 --> 01:05:26.860]  but then you look for how they plan and I think you have suggested this, get you a good
[01:05:26.860 --> 01:05:34.580]  case, you might want to say but ever what element of that particular crime is, they
[01:05:34.580 --> 01:05:44.260]  say one, two, three, four and for the listeners I would like to pronounce Jackson versus Virginia
[01:05:44.260 --> 01:05:52.100]  is the highest standard of care for and evidence of proof, we have the partners of evidence
[01:05:52.100 --> 01:06:02.740]  from the compounder that said Mr. Gary stole my money and that's more or less several and
[01:06:02.740 --> 01:06:10.420]  then you have like in a fraud situation they have to prove clear and convincing evidence
[01:06:10.420 --> 01:06:18.460]  and then the most strict proof of all evidence is in criminal cases and if they like to call
[01:06:18.460 --> 01:06:26.260]  a seat belt a crime, it has to be beyond a reasonable doubt and if you look at Jackson
[01:06:26.260 --> 01:06:33.980]  versus Virginia, pardon me I can't give you the site, it's been quoted over 20,000 times,
[01:06:33.980 --> 01:06:42.340]  my research of Lexis, it won't even come up because but that's the leading case today
[01:06:42.340 --> 01:06:52.340]  and they quote it all the time, that is what a jury has to say beyond a reasonable doubt
[01:06:52.340 --> 01:07:00.820]  if it's a one centility, if one of the elements are left out then the man is supposed to walk
[01:07:00.820 --> 01:07:07.260]  as a matter of law and of course as a matter of crooked judges or especially prosecutors
[01:07:07.260 --> 01:07:15.020]  because it won't make a name for himself but another problem I want to speak to you about
[01:07:15.020 --> 01:07:23.380]  is if you what you're doing right there sir if it can be put in your fraud form and in
[01:07:23.380 --> 01:07:33.020]  Georgia there's a man called Bill Windsor and anyone listening go to lawlessamerica.com
[01:07:33.020 --> 01:07:44.820]  and he sued 56 federal judges and probably this week he's going to a grand jury and
[01:07:44.820 --> 01:07:53.820]  that is our answer, I do have other answers but for this particular thing what do you
[01:07:53.820 --> 01:08:02.460]  do when a judge will listen to you of course, the bar grievance, so personally that is if
[01:08:02.460 --> 01:08:10.380]  the individual knows the rules of civil procedure or criminal, well he doesn't have enough criminal
[01:08:10.380 --> 01:08:16.820]  he should know criminal procedure but then he can't prosecute criminally because that's
[01:08:16.820 --> 01:08:27.300]  the duty of the public but nevertheless I will like to say lawlessamerica.com people
[01:08:27.300 --> 01:08:35.300]  need to go there and give the gentlemen's support and get reports to your grand jury
[01:08:35.300 --> 01:08:49.380]  so for Randy's part if he can write the steps then he's given excellent steps but then unless
[01:08:49.380 --> 01:08:58.740]  he recorded you know in writing so if he can put down his fraud form sir sometime later
[01:08:58.740 --> 01:09:02.820]  I appreciate it and I'm sure someone else would.
[01:09:02.820 --> 01:09:10.740]  Okay I am working toward getting something put together but it turns out to be a tremendous
[01:09:10.740 --> 01:09:20.900]  amount of work and I would very much like to have your assistance in Georgia, did you
[01:09:20.900 --> 01:09:26.380]  hear me talk about my Australia trip?
[01:09:26.380 --> 01:09:31.940]  I heard part of it and I will tell you Randy I have a call in because you use the real
[01:09:31.940 --> 01:09:42.380]  advantage but tonight's a slack night this 4th of July so thank you I'm glad to finally
[01:09:42.380 --> 01:09:43.380]  hear that.
[01:09:43.380 --> 01:09:50.020]  The reason I ask is I didn't want to go into all of the details but it sorted out it helped
[01:09:50.020 --> 01:09:55.140]  me sort out the way to finish this litigation engine.
[01:09:55.140 --> 01:10:03.740]  I am in the process of turning the American Bar Association model standards into a set
[01:10:03.740 --> 01:10:12.980]  of questions everywhere the standard proposes a requirement I turned it into a question
[01:10:12.980 --> 01:10:19.580]  did the attorney do this or the lawyer did the lawyer do this did the lawyer fail to
[01:10:19.580 --> 01:10:27.260]  do this I'm structuring the question so that if there is a failure if there is a claim
[01:10:27.260 --> 01:10:33.500]  you check the checks box as a yes so I write the question so that all the answers to the
[01:10:33.500 --> 01:10:42.140]  affirmative will be yes and you just go down to the questionnaire this will allow you to
[01:10:42.140 --> 01:10:50.980]  mine the questionnaire for those parts of the bar standards that apply to you but by going
[01:10:50.980 --> 01:10:55.180]  down into the questionnaire you will see parts of it you otherwise wouldn't without having
[01:10:55.180 --> 01:11:05.900]  to read the whole thing because once I turn it into a question then I cut out the statute
[01:11:05.900 --> 01:11:12.060]  and put the statute in a pop up box so when you open the document you only see the questions
[01:11:12.060 --> 01:11:19.740]  and then when you move the mouse over the question a box will pop up and you will see
[01:11:19.740 --> 01:11:27.460]  the statute that I got the question from and I tried to change as few words from the statute
[01:11:27.460 --> 01:11:33.020]  as possible to turn it into the question so it's clear that this question came directly
[01:11:33.020 --> 01:11:45.420]  out of the statute this way we get the bar standards we get the judicial standards of
[01:11:45.420 --> 01:11:50.900]  judicial ethics or whatever they're called in a particular state turn that into a questionnaire
[01:11:50.900 --> 01:11:57.060]  penal code code criminal procedure rules a civil procedure they just walk down the questions
[01:11:57.060 --> 01:12:02.140]  and you start out with a set of questions you know what's your issue and you select
[01:12:02.140 --> 01:12:10.260]  criminal civil family whatever the main topic is and that eliminates a massive amount of
[01:12:10.260 --> 01:12:15.660]  code and then you go down you start answering questions did they do this if you say yes
[01:12:15.660 --> 01:12:20.620]  then we look at that issue and what's indicated in the issue is criminal issue indicated in
[01:12:20.620 --> 01:12:27.180]  the issue it will draw from the criminal code and ask you the questions relating to this
[01:12:27.180 --> 01:12:32.620]  issue and then the civil the rules of civil criminal procedure how to adjudicate the criminal
[01:12:32.620 --> 01:12:40.900]  part and then rules of civil procedure we can put together a tool where through a series
[01:12:40.900 --> 01:12:49.780]  of questions someone can mine the codes and pull the information relative to them without
[01:12:49.780 --> 01:12:58.340]  having to read all the codes 90 90% of all of this stuff we're doing is very technical
[01:12:58.340 --> 01:13:08.780]  very straightforward and the biggest problems we as pro says have is we tend to have knowledge
[01:13:08.780 --> 01:13:16.340]  in areas in which we research but then we have large gaps in our knowledge you know
[01:13:16.340 --> 01:13:24.260]  the places where attorneys tend to have a more rounded education they get out in the
[01:13:24.260 --> 01:13:31.780]  field and they wind up in the same position attorneys really don't mean a squat but this
[01:13:31.780 --> 01:13:41.060]  is a tool let me go ahead attorney attorneys they specialize and maybe two or three field
[01:13:41.060 --> 01:13:48.820]  because I've been to the whole spectrum I'm I also went for legal school but I'm a retired
[01:13:48.820 --> 01:13:57.820]  marine engineer but attorneys they study case law you know that but but then they they tend
[01:13:57.820 --> 01:14:03.940]  to specialize which you can't you can't know it all you can't know security is a no divorce
[01:14:03.940 --> 01:14:15.220]  and no murder and and and then of course there's civil procedure which is broad spectrum and
[01:14:15.220 --> 01:14:23.860]  the rule of evidence covers anything but administrative law is my specialty say but attorneys can't
[01:14:23.860 --> 01:14:33.540]  know all of it and so I say they are not well rounded I you're okay they're nice they're
[01:14:33.540 --> 01:14:39.180]  education was well rounded but once they got out of law school they you're exactly right
[01:14:39.180 --> 01:14:47.780]  they focus because their biggest fear their biggest concern is missing something and that's
[01:14:47.780 --> 01:14:53.340]  the problem we have is pro says we go in with gaps in our knowledge and the attorney comes
[01:14:53.340 --> 01:14:57.660]  in and drops his bombshell on us and we're standing there dumbfounded because we didn't
[01:14:57.660 --> 01:15:08.420]  know we had no idea to even look for it so yes trying trying to build a set of tools
[01:15:08.420 --> 01:15:15.140]  that will ask the questions and point to the issues the questions implicate and this way
[01:15:15.140 --> 01:15:26.060]  we get the basic structure of the case down we can get 80 to 90 percent that way we ever
[01:15:26.060 --> 01:15:32.780]  talk to someone with an issue you don't know what happens so you don't know what to ask
[01:15:32.780 --> 01:15:41.260]  them they don't know what the legal elements are you need to be able to help them so you
[01:15:41.260 --> 01:15:44.700]  have to sit there and listen to the whole story and there once was you get a good piece
[01:15:44.700 --> 01:15:51.900]  of information so I'm saying heck with that and besides you the person's not going to
[01:15:51.900 --> 01:15:56.340]  tell you everything they're not going to tell you what embarrasses them it's not necessarily
[01:15:56.340 --> 01:16:00.900]  because they don't mean to it's because it embarrasses them and their mind never lets
[01:16:00.900 --> 01:16:08.260]  it come to the front and then later on when it comes out oh gee Willie I should have told
[01:16:08.260 --> 01:16:19.180]  you that well create a questionnaire questionnaire doesn't invoke the emotional state that talking
[01:16:19.180 --> 01:16:31.380]  face to face does and here you have a client that can only answer the question that you
[01:16:31.380 --> 01:16:40.340]  ask in that situation you can get good information hang on Gary I'd like to finish up this conversation
[01:16:40.340 --> 01:16:47.020]  on the other side yes and then we will thank you okay our phone lines are open this is
[01:16:47.020 --> 01:16:55.980]  root of law radio Randy Calton Debbie Stevens Eddie Craig give us a call 512-646-1984 we'll
[01:16:55.980 --> 01:17:04.580]  be right back capital coin and bullion is your local source for rare coins precious metals
[01:17:04.580 --> 01:17:10.020]  and coin supplies in the Austin metro area we also ship worldwide we're a family owned
[01:17:10.020 --> 01:17:14.980]  and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin and metals purchases because
[01:17:14.980 --> 01:17:20.380]  of you Austin business has been so good that we've had to move to a new and bigger location
[01:17:20.380 --> 01:17:26.740]  we're now located at 7304 Burnett road sweet a 1.2 miles north on Burnett from our previous
[01:17:26.740 --> 01:17:31.340]  location we're on the west side of Burnett road in Stanley insurance building on the
[01:17:31.340 --> 01:17:36.100]  ground floor next to the Ishibon sushi and the genie car wash we're open Monday through
[01:17:36.100 --> 01:17:41.700]  Friday 10 to 6 Saturdays 10 to 5 you welcome to stop in during regular business hours or
[01:17:41.700 --> 01:17:48.340]  call 512-646-6440 ask for Chad or Becky and say that you heard about us on rule of law
[01:17:48.340 --> 01:17:54.500]  radio or Texas Liberty radio that's capital coin and bullion at our new location at 7304
[01:17:54.500 --> 01:18:02.980]  Burnett road sweet a we'll call 512-646-6440 my name is Randall Kelton and I co-host on
[01:18:02.980 --> 01:18:07.980]  rule of law radio we specialize in showing people how to strike back against corrupt
[01:18:07.980 --> 01:18:13.100]  public officials with the mortgage crisis worsening we set our sights on finding a remedy
[01:18:13.100 --> 01:18:17.780]  for people who have been cheated by their lenders if you have a mortgage or have paid yours
[01:18:17.780 --> 01:18:23.380]  off you have probably been cheated out of thousands but there is a remedy go to remedies
[01:18:23.380 --> 01:18:32.700]  in real estate dot com or call me at 512-430-4140 and find out how to use the consumer protection
[01:18:32.700 --> 01:18:37.940]  laws to recover what the lenders have stolen through fraud and deception we will prepare
[01:18:37.940 --> 01:18:42.940]  for you a qualified written request that will expose the fraud and put the lenders on the
[01:18:42.940 --> 01:18:48.940]  dime lender fraud is bankrupting this country and it's time to fight back go to remedies
[01:18:48.940 --> 01:18:57.580]  in real estate dot com or call 512-430-4140 and get the information you need to stop
[01:18:57.580 --> 01:19:25.580]  the money changers in their tracks
[01:19:25.580 --> 01:19:38.100]  okay we're back randy kelton debbie steven daddy craig with law radio we're talking
[01:19:38.100 --> 01:19:48.180]  to gary in georgia and we're talking about a way to be able to mine the code gary you
[01:19:48.180 --> 01:20:00.460]  do a lot of research on an issue if you have someone come in with an issue having to do
[01:20:00.460 --> 01:20:13.740]  with administrative law could you play 20 questions with them or or what would be the
[01:20:13.740 --> 01:20:20.500]  least amount of questions you could ask to elicit the elements of this person's issue
[01:20:20.500 --> 01:20:29.140]  how well it is easily standing constitutional standing because it has to be a complaining
[01:20:29.140 --> 01:20:44.700]  agent party and the full corner of anything is damaged you can have a judgment and everything
[01:20:44.700 --> 01:20:51.740]  but still the next thing is a rid of execution and proof of damage but that's off point of
[01:20:51.740 --> 01:20:59.460]  what you suggested sir how do you do it this way is of course does the agency remember
[01:20:59.460 --> 01:21:10.420]  the law of agency who is a principle that the so-called agent of the agency is an agent
[01:21:10.420 --> 01:21:17.940]  of has to show proof of agency and there's that agent agency may not be proven out of
[01:21:17.940 --> 01:21:25.100]  the mouth of the agent it must be proven out of the mouth of the principle thank you yes
[01:21:25.100 --> 01:21:33.260]  sir there you go right the beginning or we go or we go argue well let's just take a because
[01:21:33.260 --> 01:21:40.940]  most people are concerned with so-called tax issues not a tax issue it's an outright issue
[01:21:40.940 --> 01:21:48.180]  of what nobody documents and verifies with substantial ever-proved truth amount is turned
[01:21:48.180 --> 01:21:54.140]  by anybody like I said earlier we ain't received payment yes or not so who's the head of the
[01:21:54.140 --> 01:22:02.340]  test here's the we they're not there the same thing on the mortgage issue you have these
[01:22:02.340 --> 01:22:09.340]  guys called attorneys makes in a non judicial state they'd love to say well this is a non
[01:22:09.340 --> 01:22:17.020]  judicial state but yeah but but then again I have right to do process and I have a right
[01:22:17.020 --> 01:22:26.460]  to a trial well well wait wait wait you sign the mortgage yes but then mr. attorney where
[01:22:26.460 --> 01:22:35.820]  is the contract you have with a principle to litigate this case it's not there if it's
[01:22:35.820 --> 01:22:41.740]  not there there's no they don't need to go any further and then you have to have from
[01:22:41.740 --> 01:22:52.220]  the principle since it's a non-breathing entity in other words illegal fiction and it's which
[01:22:52.220 --> 01:23:00.020]  call it's legally dead because it can't breathe and therefore they have to have a somewhat
[01:23:00.020 --> 01:23:11.220]  appointed to represent the artificial entity being the real part of interest of rule 17
[01:23:11.220 --> 01:23:16.420]  anyway you got to have a real part of interest complaining that I was injured and who did
[01:23:16.420 --> 01:23:25.020]  it but then the artificial entity can't speak so it has to point a witness under rule 36
[01:23:25.020 --> 01:23:34.700]  of federal and most states to copy the federal rules of civil civil procedure and then out
[01:23:34.700 --> 01:23:40.700]  of the confrontation clause and rules of evidence you have a right to tell me full of bovine
[01:23:40.700 --> 01:23:50.700]  intestinal secretion because they got nothing and and then we have a validation of the so
[01:23:50.700 --> 01:23:57.700]  called dead it's not there either and I and I've looked at the US government style man
[01:23:57.700 --> 01:24:04.500]  manual and I started noticing these things that people talked about well they got your
[01:24:04.500 --> 01:24:09.820]  name he kept so that must be I don't like to use the word straw man there's a legal
[01:24:09.820 --> 01:24:18.380]  term straw man or our peers the corporate veil and who is the real who is this fictional
[01:24:18.380 --> 01:24:27.380]  entity well they do print everyone's name and capital letters even if my street address
[01:24:27.380 --> 01:24:36.500]  there just like if you're a corporation which is illegal fiction and that's the next step
[01:24:36.500 --> 01:24:44.300]  I would suggest anyone but wait we got to two entities here according to the US government
[01:24:44.300 --> 01:24:52.540]  style manual you can go to a Google by the government printing office US government style
[01:24:52.540 --> 01:25:00.180]  manual download a copy or they even sell them but that's one of the things people need to
[01:25:00.180 --> 01:25:10.380]  look into to find out for what is a legally just viable reason you put my name in those
[01:25:10.380 --> 01:25:20.540]  and in all caps and I start looking at the all my own it's a bank check my bank check
[01:25:20.540 --> 01:25:31.580]  my name is things on capital capital letters well let me offer a reason for that initially
[01:25:31.580 --> 01:25:40.260]  after teletype one of the best ways to transfer information were with ticker tapes I'm sorry
[01:25:40.260 --> 01:25:46.100]  after I was saying after telegraph was ticker tapes to teletype teletype machines were a
[01:25:46.100 --> 01:25:53.180]  primary source of communication for a very long time but they only had one character
[01:25:53.180 --> 01:25:59.220]  set and it was uppercase it became relatively traditional to send this information that
[01:25:59.220 --> 01:26:12.580]  way and the always my question is if I write my name in all capitals do I necessarily become
[01:26:12.580 --> 01:26:23.220]  a corporation I would say no but even if just because my name is written in all capitals
[01:26:23.220 --> 01:26:32.620]  that's not what makes me a corporation it's only prima facie evidence that I may be a
[01:26:32.620 --> 01:26:43.060]  corporation and I have all of these guys saying that because it is in capitals then it's necessarily
[01:26:43.060 --> 01:26:54.860]  a corporation that's a non sequiturs a post hoc argument and I've always had a problem
[01:26:54.860 --> 01:27:02.100]  with that there may be totally other reasons why things are in caps but how many questions
[01:27:02.100 --> 01:27:07.980]  do you think you could shrink an issue down to the reason I ask that is I was talking
[01:27:07.980 --> 01:27:14.820]  to an engineer in Austin and he said he worked with artificial intelligence question trees
[01:27:14.820 --> 01:27:20.460]  and they took the most complex profession they could find and it was doctors doing some
[01:27:20.460 --> 01:27:27.220]  kind of blood research and they took their information and broke it down into as simple
[01:27:27.220 --> 01:27:33.340]  a set of questions as they could and they got it down to 16 questions and they went
[01:27:33.340 --> 01:27:38.220]  back to the doctors with it and the doctors they told him 16 questions they said none
[01:27:38.220 --> 01:27:46.100]  no way and then they looked at the questions and they said yeah you're right that they
[01:27:46.100 --> 01:27:52.580]  worked in this field and it appeared so complex to them and they all kept going to these same
[01:27:52.580 --> 01:27:59.380]  issues but they went to those issues from different directions and in different contexts
[01:27:59.380 --> 01:28:06.620]  and never sat down and pulled out from the plethora of possibilities those key issues
[01:28:06.620 --> 01:28:14.900]  that kept coming up that's what I'm looking for how many bare bones key issues can we
[01:28:14.900 --> 01:28:22.900]  break the code down into or any particular situation down into I do the process give
[01:28:22.900 --> 01:28:31.020]  me 50 questions I got everything in that well in the in the area of administrative procedures
[01:28:31.020 --> 01:28:40.660]  that I mean I start off with standing in and it's purpose and it was passed as a for branch
[01:28:40.660 --> 01:28:47.260]  of government because it is not mentioned the Constitution no way and who does it apply
[01:28:47.260 --> 01:28:58.700]  to and it applies to only people that can be regulated by statute but then as we use
[01:28:58.700 --> 01:29:06.900]  word agency he's an agent of some principle but in my my side I would have to be proven
[01:29:06.900 --> 01:29:15.900]  because otherwise okay what questions would you ask to make the determination that could
[01:29:15.900 --> 01:29:23.740]  be answered with a yes or no that would lead you to agency what elements would have to
[01:29:23.740 --> 01:29:36.940]  be there well the elements would be of course a contract on any issue I know we gotta go
[01:29:36.940 --> 01:29:43.580]  I know I'm taking a call first but if he's like I'll get off or whatever okay we will
[01:29:43.580 --> 01:29:48.940]  you know we need to go on I do appreciate Gary it's been a long time it's the first
[01:29:48.940 --> 01:29:54.100]  good conversation we've had this is Randy counten Debra Stevens Eddie Craig with
[01:29:54.100 --> 01:30:00.860]  la radio we'll be right back and hang on to the other side top 10 reasons to question
[01:30:00.860 --> 01:30:04.900]  the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing reason number five as witnessed by millions
[01:30:04.900 --> 01:30:08.700]  of viewers the rescue efforts were interrupted several times due to the presence of other
[01:30:08.700 --> 01:30:13.300]  explosives government log entries indicate and witnesses report that after the initial
[01:30:13.300 --> 01:30:17.460]  devastating blast a bomb complete with timer was discovered and removed from wreckage by
[01:30:17.460 --> 01:30:22.220]  the bomb squad yet we are told it's all due to baseball bomb scares or other contrivances
[01:30:22.220 --> 01:30:26.620]  so while officials try to sort out their stories all we ask is who planted these bombs and
[01:30:26.620 --> 01:30:31.140]  why is the government lying about them for more information go to okcbombingtruth.com
[01:30:31.140 --> 01:30:37.100]  is it stealing to download music from the internet you might be surprised at the way
[01:30:37.100 --> 01:30:41.220]  college students answer that question I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll be back in
[01:30:41.220 --> 01:30:46.940]  a moment with results of the new study that explores current attitudes about digital piracy
[01:30:46.940 --> 01:30:52.420]  privacy is under attack when you give up data about yourself you'll never get it back again
[01:30:52.420 --> 01:30:57.420]  and once your privacy is gone you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too so
[01:30:57.420 --> 01:31:03.460]  protect your rights say no to surveillance and keep your information to yourself privacy
[01:31:03.460 --> 01:31:07.740]  it's worth hanging on to this public service announcement is brought to you by start page
[01:31:07.740 --> 01:31:14.140]  dot com the private search engine alternative to google yahoo and bin start over with start
[01:31:14.140 --> 01:31:20.380]  page you've probably seen public service messages about digital piracy one of the most
[01:31:20.380 --> 01:31:26.100]  famous ads likens illegally downloading digital content to stealing a car but apparently those
[01:31:26.100 --> 01:31:30.940]  education efforts aren't working a new study by the university of Nebraska found that students
[01:31:30.940 --> 01:31:36.100]  believe shoplifting a CD from a music store is wrong but those same students view illegal
[01:31:36.100 --> 01:31:41.580]  digital downloads as far less serious researchers believe digital piracy is more acceptable
[01:31:41.580 --> 01:31:46.620]  because there's no physical danger and no visible victim and since the practice is widespread
[01:31:46.620 --> 01:31:51.300]  on college campuses there's a lot of social support but as an author who's had my own
[01:31:51.300 --> 01:31:56.660]  work pirated I can say it's pretty unpleasant from this end I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht more
[01:31:56.660 --> 01:32:21.340]  news and information at Catherine Albrecht dot com
[01:32:21.340 --> 01:32:26.980]  all right folks we are back this is rule of law radio Eddie Craig Randy Kelton Deborah
[01:32:26.980 --> 01:32:30.980]  Stevens all right we got about a half an hour left in the show we've only got one caller
[01:32:30.980 --> 01:32:37.980]  left up on the board so folks if you're out there we're running out of time 5126461984
[01:32:37.980 --> 01:32:47.740]  right now we're going to go to Doug in Texas even Doug what do we do for you do what what
[01:32:47.740 --> 01:32:53.380]  can we do for you Doug already I throw you a bone there for that dog let me get my dog
[01:32:53.380 --> 01:33:00.980]  under control the dog just went wild okay what I was going to talk about is what I was going
[01:33:00.980 --> 01:33:08.740]  to talk about last week when my cell phone wasn't functioning properly I was gonna you
[01:33:08.740 --> 01:33:20.380]  know I admire you about not having your driver's license and this and my contention is that
[01:33:20.380 --> 01:33:27.820]  you can't have a driver's license and still be traveling not using your license right
[01:33:27.820 --> 01:33:35.580]  right that's true you can okay and I have a motor vehicle that has that little sticker
[01:33:35.580 --> 01:33:45.220]  that I have to buy and put on the windshield but I'm not utilizing that vehicle at the
[01:33:45.220 --> 01:33:54.100]  time it's not a vehicle it's my private you know conveyance or whatever right that's true
[01:33:54.100 --> 01:34:05.020]  depending upon what it is and how it's marked and so on and so forth what we just lose contact
[01:34:05.020 --> 01:34:10.460]  with no I'm here I said that that that's true depending upon where you're leading up to
[01:34:10.460 --> 01:34:16.020]  how it's marked and how it's being used and so on and so forth okay and I pull up to the
[01:34:16.020 --> 01:34:28.780]  711x on whatever every day and they say the unlicensed possession of a weapon on this property
[01:34:28.780 --> 01:34:41.940]  is a felony punishable by 10 years or up to $10,000 fine and I you know I have a huge
[01:34:41.940 --> 01:34:47.540]  you know I could kill everybody in Austin I guess with all the weapons that I have in
[01:34:47.540 --> 01:34:58.220]  my toolbox you know chainsaws and nail guns and machetes and just whatever you want you
[01:34:58.220 --> 01:35:07.740]  know anything you think if I kill the population because those are tools or their weapons depending
[01:35:07.740 --> 01:35:19.060]  upon how I use them right well that part also is true right so I'm just saying that it's
[01:35:19.060 --> 01:35:27.620]  more convenient for me to have a driver's license even though I don't ever drive but
[01:35:27.620 --> 01:35:36.700]  I you know the occasion ever rose that I want to drive I would be licensed do so well that's
[01:35:36.700 --> 01:35:44.180]  true but again we're back to the issue of exactly how does that help you Doug if they
[01:35:44.180 --> 01:35:50.060]  stop you and pull you over and you're trying to say I'm not engaging in any activity that
[01:35:50.060 --> 01:35:54.540]  requires the license yet you're spending all your time surrendering the license how is
[01:35:54.540 --> 01:36:03.540]  that helping you well well that's okay that's Eddie we're you know if you say I said you're
[01:36:03.540 --> 01:36:10.300]  driving and and you say well no I'm not I'm traveling right but the moment you produce
[01:36:10.300 --> 01:36:19.220]  that license you are enforcing their determination that you are using the license but I say this
[01:36:19.220 --> 01:36:25.500]  is for identification purposes only okay but again Doug what does that change about the
[01:36:25.500 --> 01:36:30.340]  situation is my question you give them a license they're going to write you the ticket you're
[01:36:30.340 --> 01:36:35.060]  going to go to court you're still in the same boat you are right now what difference does
[01:36:35.060 --> 01:36:42.620]  it possibly make well because I tell them this is for identification purposes only I
[01:36:42.620 --> 01:36:50.220]  give you a hunting license a fishing license I'm not fishing this is for identification
[01:36:50.220 --> 01:36:55.340]  purposes only yeah but you could handle my fifth a gin while you're driving down the
[01:36:55.340 --> 01:37:00.620]  road and say this is for dehydration prevention purposes only it's still not going to stop
[01:37:00.620 --> 01:37:06.860]  them from putting you under arrest for open container or DUI right right but we know how
[01:37:06.860 --> 01:37:12.500]  to beat that I mean that's yeah I provided to give it back to you to finish it right
[01:37:12.500 --> 01:37:23.740]  but in this case I think I understand where you want to get to my point is is you can't
[01:37:23.740 --> 01:37:29.620]  get there the reason you can't get there is because what you're suggesting about having
[01:37:29.620 --> 01:37:36.180]  it in order to be prepared changes absolutely nothing if you're having to present it anyway
[01:37:36.180 --> 01:37:41.340]  whether you're using it or not because the moment you present it the presumption remains
[01:37:41.340 --> 01:37:48.260]  you're using it and well if you tell them that this is for identification purposes
[01:37:48.260 --> 01:37:56.900]  only I could give you a fishing license the hunting license or whatever this has nothing
[01:37:56.900 --> 01:38:05.260]  to do I'm not engaged in a commercial activity this does not apply this is for identification
[01:38:05.260 --> 01:38:10.900]  purposes only well then why not just have a state issued ID card that's just for identification
[01:38:10.900 --> 01:38:24.180]  purposes only does my kid I did maybe I'll do that when I grow up but I'm just but because
[01:38:24.180 --> 01:38:30.540]  my point here is very simple and that is is that yes I understand the first thing they
[01:38:30.540 --> 01:38:36.580]  should be asking you when they walk up to the car is are you actively engaging in commerce
[01:38:36.580 --> 01:38:42.780]  at this time right that should be a determination that they should be required to make right
[01:38:42.780 --> 01:38:48.420]  then and there and if they cannot show with verifiable proof that you're engaging in an
[01:38:48.420 --> 01:38:53.220]  act that requires the license then they can't apply the rules governing that license and
[01:38:53.220 --> 01:39:00.940]  the other accouterments with it right but we know that's not how it's going to work
[01:39:00.940 --> 01:39:05.020]  whether you present them with the license they're going to issue the citation if you
[01:39:05.020 --> 01:39:09.220]  don't present them with the license they're going to issue the citation the end result
[01:39:09.220 --> 01:39:14.340]  is still the same you're still going to court you're still having to fight the issue you're
[01:39:14.340 --> 01:39:19.540]  still hoping to win so you don't have to pay the fines and so on and so forth you really
[01:39:19.540 --> 01:39:26.260]  haven't changed anything just by asserting you're using it for the purposes of ID only
[01:39:26.260 --> 01:39:34.380]  I think I think they have a little bill where you can't have a driver's license and a Texas
[01:39:34.380 --> 01:39:41.540]  ID notification no not true you can't have multiple licenses from multiple states but
[01:39:41.540 --> 01:39:52.300]  you can carry multiple IDs from the same state they just can't be the same type of ID all
[01:39:52.300 --> 01:40:02.340]  right whatever I'm doing good you know I'm doing fine I don't they don't get me to
[01:40:02.340 --> 01:40:08.300]  deal with problems and then I can deal with well that's good I like to hear that part
[01:40:08.300 --> 01:40:15.780]  at least well at all you have to be just a little bit smarter than they are and that's
[01:40:15.780 --> 01:40:22.780]  not a big problem now I think your hound dog that would qualify for most of them but that
[01:40:22.780 --> 01:40:32.500]  great pair of knees great pair of knees but he yeah I think he's smarter than the majority
[01:40:32.500 --> 01:40:42.220]  of the enforcement officials in this county so we're a team we're a team well that's
[01:40:42.220 --> 01:40:49.060]  good enough okay all right now I think you know I want to congratulate you on staying
[01:40:49.060 --> 01:40:58.700]  awake all night being around Randy well thank you actually that's quite an accomplishment
[01:40:58.700 --> 01:41:03.860]  in itself I didn't go to bed till 6 30 this morning and got back up four hours later that's
[01:41:03.860 --> 01:41:10.580]  been my entire story for this whole week but you must be on something out of illegal drugs
[01:41:10.580 --> 01:41:17.300]  or something to do no I'm just high on life and necessity all right all right you're good
[01:41:17.300 --> 01:41:23.260]  man Eddie man well thank you Doug anything else good work man that'll just bet correct
[01:41:23.260 --> 01:41:30.340]  everything in my life all right well you have a good night then Doug and thanks for calling
[01:41:30.340 --> 01:41:37.940]  in talk to her all right all right folks we got about two and a half minutes to break
[01:41:37.940 --> 01:41:43.220]  Doug was the last caller on the board Randy was there something in particular on due process
[01:41:43.220 --> 01:41:47.500]  you wanted to go skating around while we're waiting on somebody else to call in if any
[01:41:47.500 --> 01:41:56.260]  512646 1984 folks give us a call we got one segment left yeah I did but I kind of cut
[01:41:56.260 --> 01:42:05.100]  off the due process a little short because we had some callers but it's a strategy it's
[01:42:05.100 --> 01:42:19.980]  a strategy for creating politics creating outside pressures on the judge on the attorneys
[01:42:19.980 --> 01:42:25.980]  you go in and file start filing judicial conduct complaints against the judge the judge is
[01:42:25.980 --> 01:42:34.580]  absolutely forbidden to mention it to you now this goes on his record it never comes off
[01:42:34.580 --> 01:42:42.980]  in any pool or any organization there are a pool of people who all want the highest
[01:42:42.980 --> 01:42:52.260]  position and the higher someone gets up in an organization the more sharks they got down
[01:42:52.260 --> 01:42:58.860]  below them swimming around in their pool wanting to take their place and excuse me if I'm mixing
[01:42:58.860 --> 01:43:04.180]  a few to too many metaphors but the higher they get the more people they have below them
[01:43:04.180 --> 01:43:10.060]  that are after them and one thing I tell people is you're not going to get these guys to be
[01:43:10.060 --> 01:43:17.900]  afraid of you none of these guys are afraid of me that I go after what they're afraid
[01:43:17.900 --> 01:43:27.180]  of is that I will create essentially cannon fodder that one of their enemies can use to
[01:43:27.180 --> 01:43:33.780]  get them replaced I think most people know about if you've been listening for any time
[01:43:33.780 --> 01:43:39.860]  about as we file in complaints you can solve the highest judges in Texas and I'll go to
[01:43:39.860 --> 01:43:48.580]  that as an illustration when we come back about how to create political pressure this
[01:43:48.580 --> 01:43:53.900]  is Randy Kelton Debra Stevens at Craig will blow radio and we've got one more segment
[01:43:53.900 --> 01:44:03.060]  give us a call 512-646-1984 we'll be right back at hempusa.org we offer chemical free
[01:44:03.060 --> 01:44:09.060]  products to people around the world detoxifying self healing while rebuilding the immune system
[01:44:09.060 --> 01:44:15.060]  we urge our listeners to please consider our largest selling product micro plant powder
[01:44:15.060 --> 01:44:20.300]  our micro plant powder is rich in silica and probiotics to help rebuild the immune system
[01:44:20.300 --> 01:44:25.580]  and to create a healthy stomach flora micro plant powder is excellent for daily intake
[01:44:25.580 --> 01:44:30.300]  and is perfect to add to your storage shelter we urge our listeners to please visit us at
[01:44:30.300 --> 01:44:36.340]  hempusa.org and remember all of our products are chemical free and healthy to eat we constantly
[01:44:36.340 --> 01:44:41.300]  strive to give you the best service highest quality and rapid shipping anywhere and we
[01:44:41.300 --> 01:44:48.140]  offer free shipping on orders over $95 in the US please visit us at hempusa.org or call
[01:44:48.140 --> 01:44:57.180]  908-6912-608 that's 908-6912-608 see what our powder seeds and oil can do for you at
[01:44:57.180 --> 01:45:05.940]  hempusa.org are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney
[01:45:05.940 --> 01:45:11.540]  with jurisdictionary the affordable easy to understand for city course that will show
[01:45:11.540 --> 01:45:19.180]  you how in 24 hours step by step if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing
[01:45:19.180 --> 01:45:24.340]  if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself thousands have won with our
[01:45:24.340 --> 01:45:31.860]  step by step course and now you can too jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22
[01:45:31.860 --> 01:45:37.620]  years of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone
[01:45:37.620 --> 01:45:43.420]  should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[01:45:43.420 --> 01:45:51.060]  you'll receive our audio classroom video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases prosa tactics
[01:45:51.060 --> 01:45:57.180]  and much more please visit rule of law radio dot com and click on the banner or call toll
[01:45:57.180 --> 01:46:09.380]  free 866-LAW-E-Z.
[01:46:27.180 --> 01:46:36.260]  Hi folks we are back this is rule of law radio Randy faded out there a little bit toward
[01:46:36.260 --> 01:46:39.940]  you we're going to get him back on now letting pick up where he was talking about dealing
[01:46:39.940 --> 01:46:52.060]  with the creating politics on the due process side yes we don't expect the prosecutor to
[01:46:52.060 --> 01:46:59.660]  prosecute these guys actually we probably don't want him to mess up our issues because
[01:46:59.660 --> 01:47:06.460]  the courts don't like someone being prosecuted both in criminal and civil at the same time
[01:47:06.460 --> 01:47:13.740]  but that's not the point we're trying to create political pressure and it's hard to convince
[01:47:13.740 --> 01:47:23.820]  people to take these steps they think that's the criminal process is so serious well that
[01:47:23.820 --> 01:47:29.060]  they're afraid to get into it and they're concerned about retribution of feedback well
[01:47:29.060 --> 01:47:35.860]  I hope we've given enough information that it's clear that you can't get legally get
[01:47:35.860 --> 01:47:45.740]  feedback and the higher someone else is higher up someone is in their pool the more people
[01:47:45.740 --> 01:47:50.980]  they got below them coming after them and the more sensitive they are to the kinds of
[01:47:50.980 --> 01:47:57.100]  criticism we give them when I went out I was talking about filing criminal complaints against
[01:47:57.100 --> 01:48:03.380]  all the highest judges in Texas now I filed against them it took a year or so of hammering
[01:48:03.380 --> 01:48:07.540]  them but I finally got all my complaints in front of a grand jury and I thought it was
[01:48:07.540 --> 01:48:18.860]  my excellent oratory that and all the pressure I put on these judges and prosecutors that
[01:48:18.860 --> 01:48:28.260]  got this done turns out Ron Earl 25 year prosecuting attorney he's not running for office again
[01:48:28.260 --> 01:48:37.820]  he's a Democrat all these judges are Republicans I merely provided cannon fodder that Ron Earl
[01:48:37.820 --> 01:48:43.260]  could use against these other officials they're not going to be afraid of you they're going
[01:48:43.260 --> 01:48:50.620]  to be afraid of the problems you're going to cause them and the opportunity you're going
[01:48:50.620 --> 01:48:57.260]  to give someone else to come up and use against them and take their position that's the thing
[01:48:57.260 --> 01:49:05.020]  about judicial conduct complaints that's what hurt the judge the most we do have Jason from
[01:49:05.020 --> 01:49:15.460]  Texas we just have nine minutes left go to Jason stop rambling on about due process Jason
[01:49:15.460 --> 01:49:22.500]  you have a question for us one but you're talking about jumping in you to make room
[01:49:22.500 --> 01:49:28.620]  in the pool because I'm trying to jump in with you come on in what is hot is getting
[01:49:28.620 --> 01:49:38.020]  hotter oh yeah I've got a question about getting records from the county clerk I went down
[01:49:38.020 --> 01:49:42.420]  I called I guess a while back well I called and talked about last week but on a separate
[01:49:42.420 --> 01:49:48.780]  issue I was detained with no probable cause for about 45 minutes and I've got criminal
[01:49:48.780 --> 01:49:56.900]  complaints written up and what I was trying to do is I went down to the clerk in the civil
[01:49:56.900 --> 01:50:06.620]  division and I asked her for I asked her to see a file or the last 10 files for what is
[01:50:06.620 --> 01:50:13.500]  it now that I'm on the phone here I would just went blank from unlawful it's not unlawful
[01:50:13.500 --> 01:50:20.180]  restraint what's the charge for being unlawful unlawfully detained awesome prison there you
[01:50:20.180 --> 01:50:24.740]  go there you go I think about the rest of prison and I asked that clerk to see the last
[01:50:24.740 --> 01:50:30.940]  10 files involving that charge and she told me that I would have to go that they didn't
[01:50:30.940 --> 01:50:37.140]  keep those files there and I'd have to go talk to the prosecutor so the question was
[01:50:37.140 --> 01:50:40.540]  and I asked her I says well what if I wanted to see something else she said well I would
[01:50:40.540 --> 01:50:45.220]  have to have a specific case number and they used to have a computer there sitting on the
[01:50:45.220 --> 01:50:53.140]  desk that you could use and that's gone so let me let me tell you how I handled that
[01:50:53.140 --> 01:51:03.180]  I was in Denton and asked them for the last 10 files the cases filed in this office and
[01:51:03.180 --> 01:51:12.260]  she said I'll have to have a cause number I said give me pick a cause number take a
[01:51:12.260 --> 01:51:18.620]  pick I don't care give me 10 she had to have a cause number what is the last cause number
[01:51:18.620 --> 01:51:23.620]  you issued in this court I don't know who would know I couldn't tell you wait right
[01:51:23.620 --> 01:51:29.100]  here I doubt 9-1-1 and ask for the Sheriff's Department since I went down here to arrest
[01:51:29.100 --> 01:51:38.140]  her I wound up with a half a dozen cops out there and they're arguing with me and then
[01:51:38.140 --> 01:51:47.020]  this guy Mr. Cox came out now Mr. Cox used to be the head investigator for the district
[01:51:47.020 --> 01:51:53.420]  attorney but the district attorney got voted out and they got in a new one he fired everybody
[01:51:53.420 --> 01:51:59.780]  and Mr. Cox is well known and well respected and this Sheriff's Deputy or not Sheriff's
[01:51:59.780 --> 01:52:06.860]  Deputy a security guard in the Denton County courthouse is arguing with me about what
[01:52:06.860 --> 01:52:13.980]  he about not arresting the clerk and they're trying to question me and making threats
[01:52:13.980 --> 01:52:20.340]  against me and Mr. Cox walks past and catches this guy by the shirt and says here follow
[01:52:20.340 --> 01:52:26.820]  me they walk away about 10 or 15 feet and Mr. Cox is talking to him and then the guy
[01:52:26.820 --> 01:52:31.780]  comes back and said Mr. Kelton I will talk to the clerk she will get you your records
[01:52:31.780 --> 01:52:42.260]  I don't know what Mr. Cox told him but I got a good idea I tell the story about telling
[01:52:42.260 --> 01:52:48.420]  this prosecutor but Mr. Jones if you've just been over I'll pull that wild head and you're
[01:52:48.420 --> 01:52:57.860]  behind for you and it was right at that moment that Mr. Cox stepped out the door so we he
[01:52:57.860 --> 01:53:06.100]  knew who I was that he had been around with me they find out that once you take them on
[01:53:06.100 --> 01:53:12.740]  and you don't lose your cool you don't get excited you just follow the routine and when
[01:53:12.740 --> 01:53:24.340]  I go in I like for the people there to think watch this no good scoundrel he's just coming
[01:53:24.340 --> 01:53:29.100]  in here trying to get you to do something so he can find a reason to call the police
[01:53:29.100 --> 01:53:38.060]  and try to get you arrested I hope they think that because they're right so don't screw
[01:53:38.060 --> 01:53:43.700]  with me you're a the clerk the clerk will give me these records if she restricts me
[01:53:43.700 --> 01:53:51.180]  in any way I'll consider it a criminal violation of 1.29 code of criminal procedure it's criminal
[01:53:51.180 --> 01:53:57.020]  in that she denies me in the full free access to her enjoyment right in violation of 39.03
[01:53:57.020 --> 01:54:08.220]  code I'm 9-1-1 or go get security you want their security what you do is when she gives
[01:54:08.220 --> 01:54:12.780]  you just a little bit of this crap you go get security tell them come with me I need
[01:54:12.780 --> 01:54:17.780]  you and he'll say what's this about what's about records and I want to make sure that
[01:54:17.780 --> 01:54:25.620]  we don't have any kind of difficulty or disruption of the court of the clerk's office but I'm
[01:54:25.620 --> 01:54:32.180]  having a little problem I need you and they'll almost always come I've never had them not
[01:54:32.180 --> 01:54:37.100]  and then I go back and ask the clerk for these last 10 records and she says I told him you
[01:54:37.100 --> 01:54:41.300]  don't have to do this you don't have to do that then you turn to security and you say
[01:54:41.300 --> 01:54:49.860]  did you hear that and you say yes I did arrest her and then he starts a walk here to arrest
[01:54:49.860 --> 01:54:54.900]  her she can just go to custody and drag her off to jail well what for she violated 1.29
[01:54:54.900 --> 01:55:02.300]  code procedure that says all I mean the code procedure says all courts shall be public
[01:55:02.300 --> 01:55:07.340]  she denied me in a public court and she did so in violation of 39.03 people code arrest
[01:55:07.340 --> 01:55:15.180]  her oh yeah I can all of a sudden all the bravado goes away we're up to you to arrest
[01:55:15.180 --> 01:55:19.820]  her I said well it's okay I don't mind if you don't arrest her you can since you committed
[01:55:19.820 --> 01:55:23.300]  to acting your son in your presence but if you don't want to arrest her that's okay but
[01:55:23.300 --> 01:55:30.940]  I do need you to take an incident report or I will reverse swear to a criminal complaint
[01:55:30.940 --> 01:55:38.700]  and I'd like you to verify it in accordance with your authority under a 213 code procedure
[01:55:38.700 --> 01:55:45.260]  Randy that would have to be a sheriff's deputy at the county courthouse right yeah they're
[01:55:45.260 --> 01:55:51.900]  all of the bailiffs are sheriff's deputies okay okay anyway it doesn't matter all it
[01:55:51.900 --> 01:56:00.700]  has to be is a certified police officer okay if you have a question about it ask them I
[01:56:00.700 --> 01:56:07.660]  went into the main court me into the capital building and walked up to this if you go into
[01:56:07.660 --> 01:56:13.140]  the capital building with a supreme and the court of appeals criminal appeals are the
[01:56:13.140 --> 01:56:19.340]  first guy there as you come in the door I said are you a certified police officer he
[01:56:19.340 --> 01:56:25.780]  said no I'm not I'm just a security guard get me a certified police officer well why
[01:56:25.780 --> 01:56:30.780]  do you need a certified police officer I have business with him and it's none of yours get
[01:56:30.780 --> 01:56:38.500]  me a certified police officer okay okay I did so first thing you ask the police officer
[01:56:38.500 --> 01:56:44.220]  are you a certified police officer and if he says yes then you tell him you know come
[01:56:44.220 --> 01:56:50.980]  with me I need you and then you do I did this in Waco oh it was a hoot she wouldn't give
[01:56:50.980 --> 01:56:56.140]  me these records that I had to file a written request I walked around the corner and as
[01:56:56.140 --> 01:57:00.740]  I told her wait right here don't go anywhere somebody's gonna want to talk to you I walked
[01:57:00.740 --> 01:57:04.820]  around the corner and this female sergeant standing there and a bunch of them I said
[01:57:04.820 --> 01:57:10.660]  who's the head of security here and they pointed to sergeant you come with me I need you and
[01:57:10.660 --> 01:57:15.340]  I swirled around I'm in a nice suit at the time so she doesn't know who I am and I go
[01:57:15.340 --> 01:57:22.900]  back to the JP's office took a while she finally decided she better come and I ran the routine
[01:57:22.900 --> 01:57:27.620]  on her I want to see these records I told you you have to give me a written request ma'am
[01:57:27.620 --> 01:57:33.980]  did you hear that yes I did arrest her why can't arrest her she sure can but what I
[01:57:33.980 --> 01:57:41.220]  arrest her for criminal violation 39.03 p.m. code it's repression she said you'd have to
[01:57:41.220 --> 01:57:45.180]  give her a 10-day arrest the question she had 10 days to answer I know that's what she
[01:57:45.180 --> 01:57:52.020]  said but that's not what 27004 government code says well I don't have 27004 government
[01:57:52.020 --> 01:57:58.300]  code I can help you out there picked up my case we'd stand pulled out a copy here read
[01:57:58.300 --> 01:58:07.260]  and weep then I wound up with about 10 or 15 security I got lieutenants captains they're
[01:58:07.260 --> 01:58:13.540]  all trying to talk me out of demanding they arrest this clerk I've never wanted the clerk
[01:58:13.540 --> 01:58:20.780]  arrested in the first place but I got her attention and the JP came out and told her
[01:58:20.780 --> 01:58:27.100]  to give me the records I was asking for that I can go back to Waco today and ask for records
[01:58:27.100 --> 01:58:35.340]  and I won't get any crapola that's what it's okay okay I am sorry I used up all your time
[01:58:35.340 --> 01:58:41.580]  this is Randy Kelsen and I'm Steve and Betty Craig we really love radio we're about finished
[01:58:41.580 --> 01:58:48.580]  with our four hour info marathon I hope you all have a wonderful 4th of July and we will
[01:58:48.580 --> 01:58:55.540]  see you next week Eddie you're gonna do the show Monday yes I will be here doing the show
[01:58:55.540 --> 01:59:01.260]  Monday everybody else may still be running around but I'll be here Bibles for America
[01:59:01.260 --> 01:59:07.380]  is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament recovery version
[01:59:07.380 --> 01:59:12.460]  the New Testament recovery version has over 9000 footnotes that explain what the Bible
[01:59:12.460 --> 01:59:18.260]  says verse by verse helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life order your
[01:59:18.260 --> 01:59:27.500]  free copy today from Bibles for America call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online
[01:59:27.500 --> 01:59:35.660]  at bfa.org this translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references
[01:59:35.660 --> 01:59:41.220]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible this is truly a Bible you
[01:59:41.220 --> 01:59:45.980]  can understand to get your free copy of the New Testament recovery version call us toll
[01:59:45.980 --> 01:59:58.540]  free at 888-551-0102 that's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org